Podcasts about acting solicitor general

An Interview with Paul Clement, Appellate Lawyer and Distinguished Lecturer in Law The US Constitution has long been revered by its citizens, yet also robustly challenged. Knowing that it would be tested, the founders created the judiciary to serve as an independent bulwark that would protect Americans' rights.  Yet the judiciary's independence has often been called into question lately, in part due to the country's ideological divide. Further, until recently, some of its authority had been ceded to the executive branch, creating an explosion of government regulation and intrusion into citizens' daily lives.  Few understand the state of the judiciary and the US Constitution better than Paul Clement, our guest on this episode of Voices of Freedom. Clement has argued more cases before the Supreme Court than anyone in recent history, giving him distinct insights into future of the Court and the most impactful rulings of our time.  Topics Discussed on this Episode: ·         How Clement's midwestern roots have influenced his approach with the Court ·         The significance of the rule of law in America and how it's distinctive from other countries ·         The danger in straying from the US Constitution's intent ·         State of the US Supreme Court ·         Court packing  - its impact on the rule of law and the Court's make up ·         How the reversal of Chevron will impact government regulation ·         What universities should do to protect free speech and counter anti-Semitism ·         The legal profession distancing itself from controversial cases ·         How Americans can understand and uphold the rule of law Paul Clement served as the 43rd Solicitor General of the United States between 2005 and 2008. Prior to that, he served as Acting Solicitor General and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General. He is a partner at Clement & Murphy and a Bradley Foundation director. Clement is a 2013 Bradley Prize recipient.

As the top courtroom lawyer for the U.S. Government, Neal Katyal has argued over 50 cases before the Supreme Court.

In this episode Trevor Cox discusses his career path, which began as an interest in trusts and estates law, and developed to the Virginia AG's office, where he served as Deputy Solicitor General & Counsel to the Executive Division, Senior Appellate Counsel, and Acting Solicitor General. As chief appellate counsel for the Commonwealth of Virginia Trevor Cox discusses his experience arguing appeals in various courts, including the Fourth Circuit. Trevor shares insights about the challenges and excitement of working in the Solicitor General's office, and his thoughts on the Fourth Circuit. Trevor also discuss the challenges of arguing cases in court, including the importance of answering questions directly and the differences between arguing before a three judge panel and an en banc court.

Splashed across newspapers the world over is the historic news of the first-ever criminal conviction of a former US president. Former US Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal joins the show to discuss the facts of the case and what happens next.  Also on today's show: Norm Eisen, former House Judiciary Special Counsel in Trump's first impeachment trial; David Urban, Republican strategist; Sarah Longwell, Executive Director, Republicans Against Trump; Tim Naftali, Presidential Historian  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

SUBSCRIBE TO BIGTENTUSABigTentUSA hosted Neal Katyal under our virtual tent. Katyal, the former Acting Solicitor General of the United States, has argued in the front of the U.S. Supreme Court on over 50 occasions. He offered insights into this term's lineup, shared updates on Trump's ongoing legal matters, and provided perspective on the resilience of American democracy.Read about Moore V. HarperNeal's Podcast Courtside (Episode with John Mulaney)ABOUT NEALNeal Katyal, the former Acting Solicitor General of the United States, focuses on appellate and complex litigation. Katyal has extensive experience in matters of constitutional, technology, corporate, patent, securities, criminal, employment, and tribal law. In the most recent 2022-23 Term, he argued five separate cases (nearly 10% of the docket), including winning the landmark voting case Moore v. Harper, which Judge Michael Luttig described as “the most important case for American democracy in the almost two and a half centuries since America's founding.” This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bigtentnews.substack.com

Michael Steele, in for Ali Velshi, is joined by Jennifer Rubin, Opinion Writer at the Washington Post, Fmr. Gov. MarkSanford, Fmr. Governor of South Carolina, Dr. Uché Blackstock, Founder & CEO at Advancing Health Equity, Dr. David J. Skorton, President & CEO at Association of American Medical Colleges, Rina Shah, Principal & Founder at Rilax Strategies, Tara Setmayer, Senior Advisor at Lincoln Project, April Ryan, White House Correspondent& Bureau Chief at The Grio, Jennifer Horn, Fmr. New Hampshire Republican Party Chair, Barbara McQuade, Fmr. U.S. Attorney for Michigan, Sen. Gary Peters (D) Michigan, Melissa Gira Grant, Staff Writer at The New Republic, and Neal Katyal, Fmr. U.S. Acting Solicitor General.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit davidlat.substack.comWho is the leading public intellectual of the Supreme Court bar? Neal Katyal—Hogan Lovells partner, Georgetown Law professor, and former Acting Solicitor General—would have a very strong claim to the title.Many SCOTUS advocates focus on winning high-court cases for their clients, but Neal aspires to more: he contributes to our national discourse. His scholarship has been published in top law reviews, including the Harvard Law Review and Yale Law Journal. He writes op-eds for leading newspapers, including the New York Times and Washington Post. He authored a Times bestseller, Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump. He makes frequent appearances on television and radio as a legal-affairs commentator. He comments on the news of the day to his more than 800,000 Twitter followers. And later this year, he's coming to Substack—exciting news that he shared in my recent podcast interview of him.I've known Neal for a long time, and I'd been wanting to have him on the show for a while. Now turned out to be a great time, for two reasons. First, just last week, he made his 50th oral argument before the Supreme Court—a major milestone that few SCOTUS advocates can claim. Second, May is Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Heritage Month, and Neal has argued more Supreme Court cases than any other AAPI lawyer—or, for that matter, any other lawyer of color. Congratulations to Neal on his 50th SCOTUS argument, and thanks to him for taking the time to join me.Show Notes:* Neal Katyal bio, Hogan Lovells US LLP* Neal K. Katyal bio, Georgetown Law* Neal Kumar Katyal, Oyez* Neal K. Katyal, Chambers and Partners* Hogan Lovells Partner Neal Katyal Celebrates 50th Supreme Court Oral Argument, National Law JournalPrefer reading to listening? For paid subscribers, a transcript of the entire episode appears below.Sponsored by:NexFirm helps Biglaw attorneys become founding partners. To learn more about how NexFirm can help you launch your firm, call 212-292-1000 or email careerdevelopment@nexfirm.com.

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Judge Michael Luttig for the definitive conversation on a giant elections case now on the calendar at the Supreme Court. Moore v Harper is a North Carolina redistricting case that is also a vehicle for the Independent State Legislature Theory - a so-called doctrine that could radically re-order democracy in America. Judge Luttig - a stalwart of conservative legal circles for decades - will argue the case as co-counsel alongside former Acting Solicitor General under Obama, Neal Katyal.  In this week's Amicus Plus segment, Dahlia is joined by Mark Joseph Stern to talk about the blossoming of bonkers gun cases in the wake of last term's SCOTUS decision in Bruen, a big case concerning consumer protections and much more…  Dahlia's new book Lady Justice: Women, the Law and the Battle to Save America, is also available as an audiobook, and Amicus listeners can get a 25% discount by entering the code “AMICUS” at checkout Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Judge Michael Luttig for the definitive conversation on a giant elections case now on the calendar at the Supreme Court. Moore v Harper is a North Carolina redistricting case that is also a vehicle for the Independent State Legislature Theory - a so-called doctrine that could radically re-order democracy in America. Judge Luttig - a stalwart of conservative legal circles for decades - will argue the case as co-counsel alongside former Acting Solicitor General under Obama, Neal Katyal.  In this week's Amicus Plus segment, Dahlia is joined by Mark Joseph Stern to talk about the blossoming of bonkers gun cases in the wake of last term's SCOTUS decision in Bruen, a big case concerning consumer protections and much more…  Dahlia's new book Lady Justice: Women, the Law and the Battle to Save America, is also available as an audiobook, and Amicus listeners can get a 25% discount by entering the code “AMICUS” at checkout Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In the second episode of S&C's Supreme Court Business Review series, hosts Judd Littleton, Julia Malkina and Morgan Ratner are joined by Sharon Cohen Levin, former head of the Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Unit in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, to discuss the Supreme Court's recent decision in Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation. The decision addresses the correct choice-of-law rule in a dispute between the family of a German Jewish woman who surrendered a painting to the Nazi regime in 1939 to obtain an exit visa and the Spanish museum that currently displays it.  Sharon brings unique insight to this area of law and explains the legal landscape for heirs seeking restitution of property looted as part of severe violations of international law. She also discusses the implications of the Court's decision for the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act more generally. S&C's Appellate Practice Led by former Acting Solicitor General of the United States Jeffrey Wall—who has argued more than 30 times before the U.S. Supreme Court—and drawing on the experience of 17 former U.S. Supreme Court clerks and more than 80 former federal circuit court clerks, S&C's Supreme Court and Appellate Practice adeptly handles challenging and high-profile appeals around the country. Our Supreme Court and Appellate lawyers collectively have significant experience before the Supreme Court and scores of other federal and state courts of appeals.

In this episode of S&C Critical Insights, Judd Littleton, Julia Malkina and Morgan Ratner introduce the third annual podcast series accompanying S&C's Supreme Court Business Review. The Review summarizes the decisions from each Term that are most relevant to business leaders, and offers practical guidance on the implications of those decisions. Judd, Julia and Morgan preview upcoming episodes and discuss two closely watched administrative law decisions from this Term. The first is National Federation of Independent Business v. OSHA, in which the Court considered whether the Occupational Safety and Health Administration had the authority to implement a national COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The second is West Virginia v. EPA, in which the Court considered whether the Environmental Protection Agency had the authority to issue the Clean Power Plan, which established carbon dioxide emissions limits for coal power plants. They also briefly touch on the Court's decision in American Hospital Association v. Becerra, in which the Court declined to address the continued viability of the Chevron doctrine in a case addressing how the Department of Health and Human Services sets drug reimbursement rates for hospitals treating Medicare patients. S&C's Supreme Court and Appellate Practice Led by former Acting Solicitor General of the United States Jeffrey Wall—who has argued more than 30 times before the U.S. Supreme Court—and drawing on the experience of 17 former U.S. Supreme Court clerks and more than 80 former federal circuit court clerks, S&C's Supreme Court and Appellate Practice adeptly handles challenging and high-profile appeals around the country. Our Supreme Court and Appellate lawyers collectively have significant experience before the Supreme Court and scores of other federal and state courts of appeals.

Neal Katyal is a professor of National Security Law at Georgetown University, a partner at Hogan Lovells law firm, and the former Acting Solicitor General. He has argued 45 cases before the Supreme Court.   Neal and Auren look back on the Supreme Court's most recent term and Neal brings some historical context to the court's major decisions. They discuss the court's new balance of power and Neal explains how Supreme Court lawyers can make arguments on the most complex legal issues in under 30 minutes. They also talk about productivity, balancing multiple roles, and how to get the best people on your team. World of DaaS is brought to you by SafeGraph. For more episodes, visit safegraph.com/podcasts.‍You can find Auren Hoffman on Twitter at @auren and Neal Katyal at @neal_katyal

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether Congress has the power to authorize suits against nonconsenting states pursuant to its constitutional war powers.Date     Proceedings and Orders Nov 02 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)Nov 03 2020 | Waiver of right of respondent Texas Department of Public Safety to respond filed.Nov 17 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.Nov 24 2020 | Response Requested. (Due December 28, 2020)Dec 01 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2020 to January 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Dec 02 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2021.Dec 23 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Jeffrey M. Hirsch filed.Dec 23 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Reserve Organization of America filed.Dec 23 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Philip C. Bobbitt, Michael C. Dorf, and H. Jefferson Powell filed.Jan 27 2021 | Brief of respondent Texas Department of Public Safety in opposition filed.Feb 10 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.Feb 10 2021 | Reply of petitioner Le Roy Torres filed. (Distributed)Mar 01 2021 | The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.Nov 09 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Nov 23 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.Nov 23 2021 | Supplemental brief of petitioner Le Roy Torres filed. (Distributed)Dec 15 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Dec 22 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Texas Department of Public SafetyDec 29 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Le Roy TorresDec 30 2021 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Le Roy Torres.Jan 18 2022 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.Jan 26 2022 | Record requested from the Court of Appeals of Texas 13th District.Jan 28 2022 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, March 29, 2022.Jan 31 2022 | The record received from the Court of Appeals of Texas 13th District is electronic and located on the Court of Appeals of Texas web site. Also one envelope containing the Notice of Appeal, Clerk's Record, and Reporter's Record.Jan 31 2022 | Brief of petitioner Le Roy Torres filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Constitutional Law and The Law of Federal and State Courts filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Jeffrey M. Hirsch filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amici curiae of War Powers Scholars filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Reserve Organization of America filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amici curiae of National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Philip C. Bobbitt, Michael C. Dorf, and H. Jefferson Powell filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Former Members of Congress filed.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Bipartisan Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)Feb 11 2022 | CIRCULATEDMar 02 2022 | Brief of respondent Texas Department of Public Safety filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2022 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.Mar 09 2022 | Brief amici curiae of State of Montana and 14 Other States filed. (Distributed)Mar 09 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Philip A. Pucillo filed. (Distributed)Mar 09 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Separation of Powers Clinic at Antonin Scalia Law School filed. (Distributed)Mar 18 2022 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.Mar 18 2022 | Reply of petitioner Le Roy Torres filed. (Distributed)Mar 29 2022 | Argued. For petitioner: Andrew T. Tutt, Washington, D. C.; and Christopher G. Michel, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Judd E. Stone, II, Solicitor General, Austin, Tex.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether a locomotive is in use on a railroad's line and subject to the Locomotive Inspection Act and its safety regulations when its train makes a temporary stop in a railyard as part of its unitary journey in interstate commerce, or whether such use does not resume until the locomotive has left the yard as part of a fully assembled train, as held by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit below, contrary to the decisions of the Supreme Court and other circuits.Date  Proceedings and Orders Dec 10 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2021)Dec 28 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, et al. filed.Jan 10 2021 | Certificate of service filed with respect to amici curiae brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, et al.Jan 10 2021 | Certificate of compliance filed with respect to brief amici curiae brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, et al. .Jan 27 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.Feb 01 2021 | Waiver of right of respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company to respond filed.Feb 08 2021 | Response Requested. (Due March 10, 2021)Mar 02 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 10, 2021 to April 9, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 03 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 9, 2021.Apr 09 2021 | Brief of respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company in opposition filed.Apr 23 2021 | Reply of petitioner Bradley LeDure filed. (Distributed)Apr 27 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.May 17 2021 | The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration of this petition.Nov 09 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Nov 23 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.Dec 15 2021 | Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.Jan 26 2022 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit.Jan 28 2022 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, March 28, 2022.Jan 31 2022 | Brief of petitioner Bradley LeDure filed.Jan 31 2022 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Jan 31 2022 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.Feb 07 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Feb 07 2022 | Amicus brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, et al. not accepted for filing.(Corrected version submitted) (February 09, 2022)Feb 07 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers-Transportation Division, et al. filed.Feb 11 2022 | CIRCULATEDFeb 15 2022 | The record from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of Illinois is electronic and located on Pacer.Mar 02 2022 | Brief of respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company filed. (Distributed)Mar 07 2022 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Mar 09 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Association of American Railroads filed. (Distributed)Mar 09 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)Mar 18 2022 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.Mar 18 2022 | Reply of petitioner Bradley LeDure filed. (Distributed)Mar 28 2022 | Argued. For petitioner: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.; and Colleen E. Sinzdak, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: J. Scott Ballenger, Washington, D. C.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether, upon finding that return to the country of habitual residence places a child at grave risk, a district court is required to consider ameliorative measures that would facilitate the return of the child notwithstanding the grave risk finding.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Jan 26 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)Mar 01 2021 | Brief of respondent Isacco Saada in opposition filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Individuals and Organizations Advocating for Victims of Domestic Violence (Sanctuary for Families, Inc., et al.) filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Frederick K. Cox International Law Center filed.Mar 16 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.Mar 16 2021 | Reply of petitioner Narkis Golan filed. (Distributed)Apr 05 2021 | The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.Oct 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Nov 16 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.Dec 06 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.Dec 10 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Jan 11 2022 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Narkis GolanJan 19 2022 | Brief of petitioner Narkis Golan filed.Jan 19 2022 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Jan 24 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Child Justice, Inc., Prevent Child Abuse NY and Professor Jennifer Baum filed.Jan 24 2022 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Isacco SaadaJan 26 2022 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit.Jan 26 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Hague Convention Delegates Jamison Selby Borek & James Hergen filed.Jan 26 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Jan 26 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Former Judges filed.Jan 26 2022 | Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Social Workers, et al. filed.Jan 26 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Frederick K. Cox International Law Center filed.Jan 26 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Domestic Violence Survivors filed.Jan 26 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Individuals and Organizations Advocating for Victims of Domestic Violence (Sanctuary for Families, Inc. et al.) filed.Jan 26 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Italian Organizations Advocating for Victims of Domestic Violence filed.Jan 27 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers in support of neither party filed.Jan 27 2022 | The record received from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit has been electronically filed.Jan 28 2022 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, March 22, 2022.Feb 03 2022 | The record received from the U.S.D.C. Eastern District of New York has been electronically filed.Feb 11 2022 | CIRCULATEDFeb 18 2022 | Brief of respondent Isacco Saada filed. (Distributed)Feb 24 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of International Academy of Family Lawyers filed. (Distributed)Feb 25 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Professors of Law Linda J. Silberman, Robert G. Spector, and Louise Ellen Teitz filed. (Distributed)Feb 25 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Child Abduction Lawyers Association (CALA) filed. (Distributed)Feb 25 2022 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Mar 04 2022 | Proposal of respondent to lodge a copy and a certified English translation of the December 16, 2021 order of the Milan Court of First Instance in Saada v. Golan filed. (Distributed)Mar 07 2022 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED in part, and the time is allotted as follows: 20 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for the Solicitor General, and 35 minutes for respondent.Mar 11 2022 | Reply of petitioner Narkis Golan filed. (Distributed)Mar 15 2022 | The Clerk has approved respondent's lodging proposal of March 4, 2022.Mar 15 2022 | Redacted order and redacted certified English translation of December 16, 2021 order of Court of First Instance of Milan lodged. (Distributed)★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act provides the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities on its lands (including bingo), as set forth in the plain language of Section 107(b), the act's legislative history and the Supreme Court's holding in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, or whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit's decision affirming Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas (Ysleta I) correctly subjects the Pueblo to all Texas gaming regulations.Date                    Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Oct 09 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)Oct 26 2020 | Waiver of right of respondent State of Texas to respond filed.Oct 28 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.Nov 03 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, et al. filed. (Distributed)Nov 10 2020 | Response Requested. (Due December 10, 2020)Nov 12 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2020 to January 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Nov 13 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 11, 2021.Jan 11 2021 | Brief of respondent State of Texas in opposition filed.Jan 25 2021 | Reply of petitioners Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, The Tribal Council, The Tribal Governor Michael Silvas or his Successor filed. (Distributed)Jan 27 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.Feb 22 2021 | The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.Aug 25 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Sep 03 2021 | Supplemental brief of respondent Texas filed. (Distributed)Sep 08 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.Oct 04 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.Oct 12 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.Oct 18 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Nov 17 2021 | Motion for an extension of time to file respondent's brief on the merits filed.Nov 19 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file respondent's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including January 10, 2022.Dec 02 2021 | Brief of petitioner Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, The Tribal Council, The Tribal Governor Michael Silvas or his Successor filed.Dec 02 2021 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Dec 09 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas filed.Dec 09 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Indian Gaming Association, et al. filed.Dec 09 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Dec 17 2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, February 22, 2022.Dec 21 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether allegations that a defined-contribution retirement plan paid or charged its participants fees that substantially exceeded fees for alternative available investment products or services are sufficient to state a claim against plan fiduciaries for breach of the duty of prudence under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1)(B).Date                    Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Jun 19 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2020)Jul 13 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 23, 2020 to August 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Jul 14 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 24, 2020.Aug 24 2020 | Brief of respondents Northwestern University, et al. in opposition filed.Sep 09 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.Sep 09 2020 | Reply of petitioners April Hughes, et al. filed. (Distributed)Oct 05 2020 | The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.May 25 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Jun 08 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.Jun 08 2021 | Supplemental brief of respondents Northwestern University, et al. filed. (Distributed)Jun 10 2021 | Supplemental brief of petitioners April Hughes, et al. filed. (Distributed)Jul 01 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.Jul 02 2021 | Petition GRANTED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.Jul 22 2021 | Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.Jul 28 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 3, 2021. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 21, 2021.Aug 02 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, April Hughes, et al.Sep 03 2021 | Brief of petitioners April Hughes, et al. filed.Sep 03 2021 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Sep 08 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Northwestern University, et al.Sep 09 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed.Sep 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Investment Law Scholars filed.Sep 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Sep 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Service Employees International Union filed.Sep 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Samuel Halpern filed.Sep 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of AARP, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, December 6, 2021.Sep 27 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit.Sep 27 2021 | Record received from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. Also received 1 Sealed document which is electronically filed.Oct 01 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Oct 21 2021 | Brief of respondents Northwestern University, et al. filed.Oct 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Euclid Fiduciary filed. (Distributed)Oct 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. (Distributed)Oct 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Investment Company Institute filed. (Distributed)Oct 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Council on Education and 17 Other Higher Education Organizations filed. (Distributed)Oct 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Committee on Investment of Employee Benefit Assets filed. (Distributed)Oct 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America filed. (Distributed)Oct 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Benefits Council filed. (Distributed)Oct 29 2021 | CIRCULATEDNov 08 2021 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED, and the time is allotted as follows: 20 minutes for petitioners, 15 minutes for the Solicitor General, and 35 minutes for respondents. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.Nov 19 2021 | Reply of petitioners April Hughes, et al. filed. (Distributed)★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional.Date                    Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Mar 16 2020 | Application (19A1027) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 16, 2020 to June 15, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.Mar 19 2020 | Application (19A1027) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until June 15, 2020.Jun 15 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)Jun 25 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 20, 2020 to August 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Jun 26 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 19, 2020, for all respondents.Jul 14 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson and Roman Catholic Diocese of Biloxi filed.Jul 14 2020 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Thomas Dobbs, et al.Jul 17 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law & Justice filed.Jul 20 2020 | Brief amici curiae of 375 Women Injured By Second and Third Trimester Late Term Abortions and Melinda Thybault, Individually and Acting on Behalf of 336,214 Signers of The Moral Outcry Petition filed.Jul 20 2020 | Brief amici curiae of The States of Texas, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia filed.Jul 20 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Illinois Right to Life filed.Jul 20 2020 | Brief amici curiae of American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, et al. filed.Jul 20 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Inner Life Fund and Institute for Faith and Family filed.Jul 20 2020 | Amicus brief of Robin Pierucci, M.D., and Life Legal Defense Foundation submitted.Aug 19 2020 | Brief of respondents Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al. in opposition filed.Sep 02 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.Sep 02 2020 | Reply of petitioners Thomas Dobbs, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 22 2020 | Rescheduled.Oct 05 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.Oct 05 2020 | Rescheduled.Oct 13 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.Oct 14 2020 | Rescheduled.Oct 22 2020 | Supplemental brief of petitioners Thomas Dobbs, et al. filed. (Distributed)Oct 26 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.Oct 26 2020 | Supplemental brief of respondents Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al. filed. (Distributed)Oct 26 2020 | Supplemental brief of respondents Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al. filed (33.1 format).Oct 29 2020 | Rescheduled.Nov 02 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.Nov 04 2020 | Rescheduled.Nov 09 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.Nov 10 2020 | Rescheduled.Nov 16 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.Nov 18 2020 | Rescheduled.Nov 30 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.Dec 01 2020 | Rescheduled.Dec 07 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.Dec 09 2020 | Rescheduled.Jan 04 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.Jan 11 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.Jan 19 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.Feb 12 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.Feb 22 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.Mar 01 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.Mar 15 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.Mar 22 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.Mar 29 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.Apr 12 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.Apr 19 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.Apr 26 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.May 10 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.May 17 2021 | Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.May 26 2021 | Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.Jun 01 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al.Jun 04 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 22, 2021. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 13, 2021.Jun 09 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Thomas Dobbs, et al.Jul 19 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Cleveland Lawyers for Life filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of David Boyle filed.Jul 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Jewish Prolife Foundation, The Coalition for Jewish Values, Rabbi Yacov David Cohen, Rabbi Chananya Weissman, and Bonnie Chernin (President, Jewish Life League) filed.Jul 22 2021 | Brief of petitioners Thomas Dobbs, et al. filed.Jul 22 2021 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Jul 22 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Alabama Center for Law and Liberty filed.Jul 22 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 375 Women Injured By Second And Third Trimester Late Term Abortions and Abortion Recovery Leaders filed.Jul 23 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Right to Life Committee and Louisiana Right to Life Federation filed.Jul 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Jewish Coalition For Religious Liberty filed.Jul 26 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Catholic Medical Association, National Association of Catholic Nurses-USA, Idaho Chooses Life and Texas Alliance for Life filed.Jul 26 2021 | Brief amici curiae of African American, Hispanic, Roman Catholic and Protestant Religious and Civil Rights Organizations and Leaders filed.Jul 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Senators Josh Hawley, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz filed.Jul 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Trinity Legal Center filed.Jul 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Thomas More Society filed.Jul 26 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Melinda Thybault, Founder of The Moral Outcry Petition, et al. filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and Other Religious Organizations filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of LONANG Institute filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 22 State Policy Organizations filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Connie Weiskopf and Kristine L. Brown filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Kurt T. Lash filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Robin Pierucci, M.D., and Life Legal Defense Foundation filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Priests for Life filed.Jul 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Amicus Curiae Hannah S., John S. and Marlene S filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Center for Medical Progress and David Daleiden filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of European Legal Scholars in support of neither party filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 396 State Legislators from 41 States filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 141 International Legal Scholars filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Prolife Center at the University of St. Thomas filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Mary Kay Bacallao Advocating for Unborn Children as Persons in support of neither party filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Randy Beck filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Christian Legal Society and Robertson Center for Constitutional Law filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Center for Religious Expression filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Center for Family and Human Rights filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Concerned Women for America filed.Jul 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Foundation for Moral Law, Lutherans for Life filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Americans United for Life filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Ethics and Public Policy Center filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Family Research Council filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Human Coalition Action and Students for Life of America filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Lee J. Strang filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Biologists in support of neither party filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Professors Mary Ann Glendon and O. Carter Snead filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Monique Chireau Wubbenhorst, M.D., M.P.H., et al. filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Commissioner Andy Gipson, Former Representative and Chair of Mississippi House Judiciary B Committee filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Care Net, a National Affiliation Organization of 1,200 Pregnancy Help Centers, and Alpha Center, a South Dakota Registered Pregnancy Help Center filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Reason for Life filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Illinois Right to Life, et al. filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Jonathan English filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Intercessors for America including its Intercessor Prayer Partners filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 228 Members of Congress filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Governor Henry McMaster and Eleven Additional Governors filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The European Centre for Law and Justice filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Catholic Bioethics Center, et al. filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Stephen G. Gilles filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Jurisprudence John M. Finnis and Robert P. George filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of States of Texas, et al. filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The American Cornerstone Institute and its founder Dr. Benjamin S. Carson filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Advancing American Freedom, Inc., et al. filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Democrats for Life of America Five Democratic Legislators from Five Individual State Legislatures filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Women Legislators, The Susan B. Anthony List filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Christian Medical & Dental Associations filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Maureen L. Condic, Ph.D. and the Charlotte Lozier Institute filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American College of Pediatricians and Association of American Physicians & Surgeons filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of CatholicVote.org Education Fund filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Heartbeat International, Inc. filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Rep. Steve Carra and 320 State Legislators from 35 States filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Foundation to Abolish Abortion, et al. filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of World Faith Foundation and Institute for Faith and Family filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of March for Life Education and Defense Fund filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Elliot Institute filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Texas Right to Life filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice and Bioethics Defense Fund filed.Jul 29 2021 | Amicus brief of Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, et al. not accepted for filing. (August 03, 2021 - Correct service required; to be printed).Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, et al. filed.Jul 29 2021 | Amicus brief of Pacific Justice Institute not accepted for filing. (August 03, 2021 - Correct service required; to be printed)Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Justice Institute filed.Jul 29 2021 | Amicus brief of Joseph W. Dellapenna not accepted for filing. (August 03, 2021 - Correct service required; to be printed)Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Joseph W. Dellapenna filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 240 Women Scholars and Professionals, and Prolife Feminist Organizations filed.Jul 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Good Counsel, Inc. filed.Aug 03 2021 | Amicus brief of 240 Women Scholars and Professionals, and Prolife Feminist Organizations submitted.Sep 13 2021 | Brief of respondents Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al. filed.Sep 16 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Anthony Hawks filed.Sep 17 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Experts, Researchers, and Advocates Opposing the Criminalization of People Who Have Abortions filed.Sep 17 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Advocates for Youth, Inc. and Neo Philanthropy, Inc. d/b/a We Testify filed.Sep 17 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Freedom From Religion Foundation, Center for Inquiry, and American Atheists filed.Sep 17 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Cecilia Fire Thunder; et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 1, 2021.Sep 20 2021 | Amicus brief of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, et al. not accepted for filing. (September 21, 2021) (corrected efiling to be submitted)Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Amicus brief of National Advocates for Pregnant Women, et al. not accepted for filing. (September 21, 2021 - corrected brief to be printed and submitted)Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Advocates for Pregnant Women, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, American Humanist Association, Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice, and Interfaith Alliance Foundation filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Court Procedure filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Yale Law School Information Society Project filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum, Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC, and Organizations Representing the Interests of Asian American and Pacific Islander Women filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Reproductive Justice Scholars filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Local Governments filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Catholics for Choice, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Campaña Nacional por el Aborto Libre, Seguro y Accesible and other Puerto Rican Organizations filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Autistic Self Advocacy Network and The Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Birth Equity Organizations and Scholars filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The American Civil Liberties Union and The American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Organizations of Women Lawyers-Women Lawyers on Guard Inc., Women's Bar Association of the District of Columbia and National Association of Women Lawyers et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Social Science Experts filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Economists filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Scholars Lee C. Bollinger, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Abortion Care Network, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Medical Students for Choice, National Abortion Federation, Physicians for Reproductive Health and Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of LGBTQ Organizations filed. (9/24/21 - Corrected brief to be reprinted and submitted).Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of LGBTQ Organizations filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of International and Comparative Legal Scholars filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Equal Protection Constitutional Law Scholars Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, and Reva Siegel filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Organizations Dedicated to the Fight for Reproductive Justice Mississippi in Action, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of European Law Professors filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Howard University School of Law Human and Civil Rights Clinic filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of States of California, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of YWCA USA, Girls Inc., Supermajority Education Fund, and United State of Women filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of United Nations Mandate Holders filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Human Rights Watch, Global Justice Center, and Amnesty International filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of California Women's Law Center filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Scott Pyles filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Leaders, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Over 500 Women Athletes, The Women's National Basketball Players Association, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Legal Voice, Asian Pacific Institute On Gender-based Violence, et at. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Women's Law Center, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Feminist Majority Foundation, Abortion Access Front, C.A. Goldberg, PLLC, The National Organization For Women Foundation, The Southern Poverty Law Center, We Engage, Professor David S. Cohen, and Krysten Connon filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 236 Members of Congress filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 547 Deans, Chairs, Scholars, et al. filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 896 State Legislators filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Society for Legal History and Other Scholars filed.Sep 20 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Abortion Funds and Practical Support Organizations filed.Sep 27 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.Oct 04 2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.Oct 12 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.Oct 13 2021 | Reply of petitioners Thomas Dobbs, et al. filed.Oct 18 2021 | The time for oral argument is allotted as follows: 35 minutes for petitioners, 20 minutes for respondents, and 15 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General.Oct 19 2021 | Motion for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for enlargement of time for oral argument out of time filed by Hannah S.Oct 29 2021 | CIRCULATEDNov 01 2021 | Motion for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for enlargement of time for oral argument out of time DENIED.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the compensatory damages available under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the statutes that incorporate its remedies for victims of discrimination, such as the Rehabilitation Act and the Affordable Care Act, include compensation for emotional distress.Date                   Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Aug 21 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2020)Sep 24 2020 | Brief of respondent Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C. in opposition filed.Oct 14 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.Oct 14 2020 | Reply of petitioner Jane Cummings filed. (Distributed)Nov 02 2020 | The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration of this petition.May 25 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Jun 07 2021 | Supplemental brief of respondent Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C. filed. (Distributed)Jun 08 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.Jul 01 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.Jul 02 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Jul 08 2021 | Motion for an extension of time filed.Jul 12 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 23, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 29, 2021.Aug 11 2021 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Jane Cummings.Aug 17 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C.Aug 23 2021 | Brief of petitioner Jane Cummings filed.Aug 26 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Jane CummingsAug 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed.Aug 30 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Disability Organizations filed.Aug 30 2021 | Brief amici curiae of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund Inc., et al. filed.Aug 30 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.Aug 30 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Sep 10 2021 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.Sep 20 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 30, 2021.Sep 27 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.Sep 29 2021 | Brief of respondent Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C. filed.Oct 01 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Oct 05 2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.Oct 05 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.Oct 06 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The States of Texas, et al. filed.Oct 06 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The National Conference of State Legislatures, et al. filed.Oct 06 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.Oct 08 2021 | The record received from the U.S.D.C. Northern District of Texas is electronic and has been filed electronically.Oct 18 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED, and the time is allotted as follows: 20 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for the Acting Solictor General, and 35 minutes for respondent.Oct 19 2021 | Application (21A98) to extend the time to file a reply brief on the merits from October 29, 2021 to November 2, 2021, submitted to Justice Alito.Oct 25 2021 | Application (21A98) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 2, 2021.Oct 29 2021 | CIRCULATEDNov 02 2021 | Reply of petitioner Jane Cummings filed. (Distributed)★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in breaking with its own prior precedent and the findings of other circuits and the Copyright Office in holding that 17 U.S.C. § 411 requires referral to the Copyright Office where there is no indicia of fraud or material error as to the work at issue in the subject copyright registration.DateProceedings and Orders Jan 04 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)Jan 19 2021 | Waiver of right of respondent H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. to respond filed.Jan 27 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.Feb 09 2021 | Response Requested. (Due March 11, 2021)Mar 04 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 11, 2021 to April 1, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 05 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2021.Mar 11 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Society of Media Photographers and California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed.Apr 01 2021 | Brief of respondents H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. in opposition filed.Apr 12 2021 | Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from April 21, 2021 to May 4, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Apr 13 2021 | Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until May 4, 2021 granted.May 03 2021 | Reply of petitioner Unicolors, Inc. filed. (Distributed)May 04 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.May 24 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.Jun 01 2021 | Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.Jun 25 2021 | Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.Jul 12 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 3, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 21, 2021.Jul 13 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Unicolors, Inc.Jul 19 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al.Aug 03 2021 | Brief of petitioner Unicolors, Inc. filed.Aug 03 2021 | Joint appendix filed.Aug 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Copyright Alliance filed.Aug 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party filed.Aug 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Society of Media Photographers and California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed.Aug 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association filed.Aug 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Law Professors filed.Aug 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.Aug 16 2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, November 8, 2021.Sep 01 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.Sep 21 2021 | CIRCULATEDSep 21 2021 | Brief of respondents H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 22 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Sep 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association filed. (Distributed)Sep 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Professors of Copyright Law filed. (Distributed)Sep 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology and Electronic Frontier Foundation filed. (Distributed)Sep 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Andrew D. Lockton and McHale & Slavin, P.A. filed. (Distributed)Sep 28 2021 | Brief amici curiae of California Fashion Association filed. (Distributed)Sep 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Victoria Burke filed. (Distributed)Sep 28 2021 | Amicus brief of National Retail Federation not accepted for filing. (Corrected version submitted) (October 04, 2021)Sep 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation filed. (Distributed)Oct 12 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.Oct 14 2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.Oct 14 2021 | Reply of petitioner Unicolors, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Oct 18 2021 | The time for oral argument is allotted as follows: 20 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General, and 35 minutes for respondent.Nov 08 2021 | Argued. For petitioner: E. Joshua Rosenkranz, New York, N. Y.; and Melissa N. Patterson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Peter K. Stris, Los Angeles, Cal.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the Austin city code's distinction between on-premise signs, which may be digitized, and off-premise signs, which may not, is a facially unconstitutional content-based regulation under Reed v. Town of Gilbert.DateProceedings and OrdersJan 20 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)Feb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.Feb 25 2021 | Waiver of right of respondent Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. to respond filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Chambers of Commerce, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.Mar 12 2021 | Response Requested. (Due April 12, 2021)Mar 17 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 12, 2021 to May 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 23 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 12, 2021.May 12 2021 | Brief of respondents Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Incorporated, et al. in opposition filed.May 26 2021 | Reply of City of Austin not accepted for filing. (May 28, 2021) (Corrected version submitted)May 26 2021 | Reply of petitioner City of Austin filed.Jun 01 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.Jun 21 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.Jun 28 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Aug 03 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc.Aug 03 2021 | Motion for an extension of time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits filed.Aug 04 2021 | Letter requesting case caption correction filed by petitioner.Aug 09 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is granted and the time is extended to and including August 13, 2021.Aug 13 2021 | Brief of petitioner City of Austin filed.Aug 13 2021 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Aug 16 2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, November 10, 2021.Aug 17 2021 | Motion for an extension of time to file respondents' brief on the merits filed.Aug 19 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The American Planning Association in Support of Neither Party filed.Aug 20 2021 | Amicus brief of Chambers of Commerce, Business Leagues, Environmental Organizations, and On-Premise Sign Associations not accepted for filing. (August 20, 2021)Aug 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Aug 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and Professor Genevieve Lakier filed.Aug 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The National League of Cities; The U.S. Conference of Mayors; The International City/County Management Association; The International Municipal Lawyers Association filed.Aug 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of International Sign Association filed.Aug 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Land Developers, Chambers of Commerce, and Scenic Organizations filed.Aug 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Outfront Media Inc. filed.Aug 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of State of Florida, et al., filed.Aug 20 2021 | Amicus brief of State of Florida, et al., not accepted for filing. (October 08, 2021--Duplicate submission)Aug 26 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Aug 31 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file respondents brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including September 22, 2021.Sep 01 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.Sep 01 2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.Sep 21 2021 | CIRCULATEDSep 22 2021 | Letter pursuant to Rule 35.3 received.Sep 22 2021 | Brief of respondents Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed. (Distributed)Sep 28 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Alliance Defending Freedom, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Out of Home Advertising Association of America, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Free Speech filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Protect the First Foundation filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Summus 2, LLC dba Summus Outdoor filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed. (Distributed)Oct 04 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.Oct 18 2021 | The time for oral argument is allotted as follows: 20 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General, and 35 minutes for respondents.Oct 22 2021 | Reply of petitioner City of Austin filed. (Distributed)Nov 10 2021 | Argued. For petitioner: Michael R. Dreeben, Washington, D. C.; and Benjamin Snyder, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D. C.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:1) Whether, consistent with the free exercise clause and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, Texas' decision to allow Ramirez's pastor to enter the execution chamber, but forbidding the pastor from laying his hands on his parishioner as he dies, substantially burden the exercise of his religion, so as to require Texas to justify the deprivation as the least restrictive means of advancing a compelling governmental interest; and (2) whether, considering the free exercise clause and RLUIPA, Texas' decision to allow Ramirez's pastor to enter the execution chamber, but forbidding the pastor from singing prayers, saying prayers or scripture, or whispering prayers or scripture, substantially burden the exercise of his religion, so as to require Texas to justify the deprivation as the least restrictive means of advancing a compelling governmental interest.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Sep 07 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2021)Sep 07 2021 | Application (21A33) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Alito.Sep 07 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.Sep 08 2021 | Brief of respondent Collier, Bryan, et al. in opposition filed.Sep 08 2021 | Reply of applicant John H. Ramirez filed.Sep 08 2021 | Application (21A33) referred to the Court.Sep 08 2021 | Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.Sep 08 2021 | The application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is granted. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The Clerk is directed to establish a briefing schedule that will allow the case to be argued in October or November 2021.Sep 09 2021 | This case is set for argument on Monday, November 1, 2021. Petitioner's brief on the merits, and any amicus curiae briefs in support of petitioner or in support of neither party, are to be filed on or before Monday, September 27, 2021. Respondents' brief on the merits, and any amicus curiae briefs in support of respondents, are to be filed on or before Friday, October 15, 2021. Petitioner's reply brief is due on or before 2 p.m., Monday, October 25, 2021.Sep 09 2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, November 1, 2021.Sep 10 2021 | The parties are directed to submit briefs that address whether petitioner adequately exhausted his audible prayer claim under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The parties are also directed to address whether petitioner has satisfied his burden under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) to demonstrate that a sincerely held religious belief has been substantially burdened by restrictions on either audible prayer or physical contact. The parties are further directed to address whether the government has satisfied its burden under RLUIPA to demonstrate its policy is the least restrictive means of advancing a compelling government interest. Finally, the parties are directed to address the type of equitable relief petitioner is seeking, the appropriate standard for this relief, and whether that standard has been met here. See Hill v. McDonough, 547 U. S. 573, 584 (2006) (setting forth a four- factor test for equitable relief). The parties may address other relevant issues, avoiding repetition of discussion in prior briefing.Sep 13 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, John RamirezSep 13 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Bryan CollierSep 21 2021 | CIRCULATEDSep 22 2021 | Motion for leave to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal filed by respondent Bryan Collier.Sep 22 2021 | Lodging proposal letter of respondents filed.Sep 22 2021 | Letter in opposition to respondents' lodging proposal filed by petitioner.Sep 23 2021 | Reply letter regarding lodging proposal filed by respondents.Sep 23 2021 | Sur-reply letter regarding respondents lodging proposal filed by petitioner.Sep 27 2021 | Joint appendix (Volume I) filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief of petitioner John Ramirez filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States in support of neither party filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of First Liberty Institute filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Freedom From Religion Foundation, et al. in support of neither party filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Protect the First Foundation filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Alliance Defending Freedom filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Former Prison Officials filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Spiritual Advisors and Former Corrections Officials filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Christian Legal Society, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Religious-Liberty Scholars Douglas Laycock, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops filed. (Distributed)Sep 27 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Scholars of the PLRA and Prison Grievance Systems filed. (Distributed)Sep 29 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.Sep 29 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Oct 01 2021 | Motion of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Oct 12 2021 | Motion for leave to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal GRANTED.Oct 12 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.Oct 12 2021 | Motion of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument DENIED.Oct 13 2021 | Respondents' September 22, 2021 lodging proposal approved, and submission of the non-record materials is requested by the Clerk.Oct 15 2021 | Brief of respondent Bryan Collier filed. (Distributed)Oct 15 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al., filed. (Distributed)Oct 15 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Maria Chavon Aguilar, Fernando Castro, Pablo Castro Jr., & Roberto Salcedo Jr. filed. (Distributed)Oct 15 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)Oct 19 2021 | Respondents' lodging material received (including redacted declaration for public record and the unredacted sealed declaration).Oct 22 2021 | ARGUMENT RESCHEDULED for Tuesday, November 9, 2021.Oct 25 2021 | Reply of petitioner John Ramirez filed. (Distributed)Nov 09 2021 | Argued. For petitioner: Seth Kretzer, Houston, Tex. For United States, as amicus curiae: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Judd E. Stone, II, Solicitor General, Austin, Tex.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:This case presents a clear and intractable conflict regarding an important jurisdictional qNew York prohibits its ordinary law-abiding citizens from carrying a handgun outside the home without a license, and it denies licenses to every citizen who fails to convince the state that he or she has “proper cause” to carry a firearm. In District of Columbia v. Heller, this Court held that the Second Amendment protects “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” 554 U.S. 570, 592 (2008), and in McDonald v. City of Chicago, the Court held that this right “is fully applicable to the States,” 561 U.S. 742, 750 (2010). For more than a decade since then, numerous courts of appeals have squarely divided on this critical question: whether the Second Amendment allows the government to deprive ordinary law-abiding citizens of the right to possess and carry a handgun outside the home. This circuit split is open and acknowledged, and it is squarely presented by this petition, in which the Second Circuit affirmed the constitutionality of a New York regime that prohibits law-abiding individuals from carrying a handgun unless they first demonstrate some form of “proper cause” that distinguishes them from the body of “the people” protected by the Second Amendment. The time has come for this Court to resolve this critical constitutional impasse and reaffirm the citizens' fundamental right to carry a handgun for self-defense. The question presented is: Whether the Second Amendment allows the government to prohibit ordinary lawabiding citizens from carrying handguns outside the home for self- defense.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Dec 17 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2021)Dec 23 2020 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al.Jan 08 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2021 to February 22, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Jan 11 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 22, 2021.Jan 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Firearms Policy Coalition and Firearms Policy Foundation filed.Jan 22 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Korte Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Korte Tree Care filed.Jan 22 2021 | Brief amici curiae of State of Missouri.et al. filed.Jan 22 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Law Enforcement Groups and State and Local Firearms Rights Groups filed.Feb 12 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Neal Goldfarb filed. (Brief corrected 3/1/21)Feb 22 2021 | Brief of respondents Keith M. Corlett, et al. in opposition filed.Mar 10 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.Mar 10 2021 | Reply of petitioners New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 29 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.Apr 12 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.Apr 19 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.Apr 26 2021 | Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: Whether the State's denial of petitioners' applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment.May 07 2021 | Motion for an extension of time file the briefs on the merits filed.May 11 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 2, 2021. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 23, 2021.May 27 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al.Jun 16 2021 | Motion for an further extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.Jun 25 2021 | Motion to further extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is further extended to and including July 13, 2021. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is further extended to and including September 14, 2021.Jul 09 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Alabama Center for Law and Liberty filed.Jul 13 2021 | Brief of petitioners New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al. filed.Jul 13 2021 | Joint appendix filed.Jul 13 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Professors of Second Amendment Law, et al. filed.Jul 14 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.Jul 14 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Bay Colony Weapons Collectors, Inc. filed.Jul 15 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs, Inc. filed.Jul 15 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Italo-American Jurists and Attorneys filed.Jul 16 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National African American Gun Association, Inc. filed.Jul 16 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Mountain States Legal Foundation's Center to Keep and Bear Arms filed.Jul 16 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of George K. Young Jr. filed.Jul 19 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms filed.Jul 19 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Representative Claudia Tenney and 175 Additional Members of the U.S. House of Representatives filed.Jul 19 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Buckeye Institute filed.Jul 19 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The DC Project Foundation; Operation Blazing Sword—Pink Pistols; Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership filed.Jul 19 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Patrick J. Charles in support of neither party filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of J. Joel Alicea filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Black Attorneys of Legal Aid, et al. filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Constitutional Rights Union filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Shooting Sports Foundation Inc. filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Independent Institute filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of State of Arizona, et al. filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Governor of Texas filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Law Enforcement Groups and State and Local Firearms Rights Groups filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Liberal Gun Club and Commonwealth Second Amendment filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated and Second Amendment Law Center, Inc filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, and Heller Foundation filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of William English, Ph.D. and The Center for Human Liberty filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Second Amendment Foundation, et al. filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Lambert Henry, Russell Davenport, and Peter Fusco filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Center for Defense of Free Enterprise, et al. filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The League for Sportsmen, Law Enforcement and Defense filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of United States Senator Ted Cruz, and 24 Other U.S. Senators filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Foundation for Gun Rights and National Association for Gun Rights filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Black Guns Matter, et al. filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Professors Robert Leider and Nelson Lund, and the Buckeye Firearms Association filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Asian Pacific American Gun Owners Association filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of FPC American Victory Fund, et al. filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Madison Society Foundation, Inc. filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Goldwater Institute filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Firearms Policy Coalition and Professor Joyce Lee Malcolm filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Independent Women's Law Center filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of California Gun Rights Foundation filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Second Amendment Law Professors in support of neither party filed.Jul 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Crime Prevention Research Center filed.Aug 16 2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, November 3, 2021.Sep 01 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit.Sep 01 2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit has been electronically filed.Sep 01 2021 | The record from the U.S.D.C. Northern District of New York has been electronically filed.Sep 13 2021 | Brief amici curiae of J. Michael Luttig, et al. filed.Sep 14 2021 | Brief of Kevin P. Bruen, et al. not accepted for filing. (September 15, 2021)Sep 14 2021 | Brief of respondents Kevin P. Bruen, et al. filed.Sep 14 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Neal Goldfarb filed.Sep 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of League of Women Voters filed. (Distributed)Sep 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Amnesty International USA, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | CIRCULATEDSep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Everytown for Gun Safety filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of States of California, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union and New York Civil Liberties Union filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Violence Policy Center filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Former Major City Police Chiefs filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Americans Against Gun Violence filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of United States Senators Charles E. Schumer, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. and National Urban League filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of City of New York filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Medical Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Professors of History and Law filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of New York County Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Former National Security Officials filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of March For Our Lives Action Fund filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Brady filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of City of Chicago and Eleven Other Cities filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Crime Commission of New York City filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Members of the Business Community filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Partnership for New York City filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Corpus Linguistics Professors and Experts filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Presiding Bishop and President of the House of Deputies of the Episcopal Church, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of John Elson filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National League of Cities, et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Amicus brief of The Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence and 35 Other Organizations not accepted for filing. (September 29, 2021 - Corrected version submitted).Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence and 35 Other Organizations filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Social Scientists and Public Health Researchers in Support of Respondents filed. (Distributed)Sep 21 2021 | Amicus brief of Prosecutors Against Gun Violence not accepted for filing. (Compliant PDF version submitted October 25, 2021)Sep 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Prosecutors Against Gun Violence filed. (Distributed)Sep 23 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Criminal Legal Scholars.Oct 12 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.Oct 12 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Criminal Legal Scholars GRANTED.Oct 14 2021 | Reply of petitioners New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Oct 18 2021 | The time for oral argument is allotted as follows: 35 minutes for petitioners, 20 minutes for respondents, and 15 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General.Nov 03 2021 | Argued. For petitioners: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, New York, N. Y.; and Brian H. Fletcher, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the rule that a plaintiff must await favorable termination before bringing a Section 1983 action alleging unreasonable seizure pursuant to legal process requires the plaintiff to show that the criminal proceeding against him has “formally ended in a manner not inconsistent with his innocence,” as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit decided in Laskar v. Hurd, or that the proceeding “ended in a manner that affirmatively indicates his innocence,” as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit decided in Lanning v. City of Glens Falls.DateProceedings and Orders (Nov 06 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)Nov 18 2020 | Waiver of right of respondent Police Officer Pagiel Clark, et al. to respond filed.Nov 24 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.Dec 03 2020 | Response Requested. (Due January 4, 2021)Dec 24 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 4, 2021 to February 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Dec 28 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 3, 2021.Jan 04 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National, State, and Local Civil Rights, Racial Justice, and Criminal Defense Organizations filed.Jan 04 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Prosecutors, Department of Justice Officials, and Judges filed.Feb 03 2021 | Brief of respondents Police Officer Pagiel Clark, et al. in opposition filed.Feb 08 2021 | Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the filing of a reply pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.Feb 09 2021 | Reply of petitioner Larry Thompson filed. (Distributed)Feb 10 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.Mar 01 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.Mar 08 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Mar 11 2021 | The order granting the petition for a writ of certiorari is amended as follows: The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.Mar 24 2021 | Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.Mar 31 2021 | Joint motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 4, 2021. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 16, 2021.May 04 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Police Officer Pagiel Clark, Shield #28472, et al.Jun 04 2021 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Jun 04 2021 | Brief of petitioner Larry Thompson filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Home School Legal Defense Association filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National, State, and Local Civil Rights, Racial Justice, and Criminal Defense Organizations filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Prosecutors, et al. filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Police Accountability Project, et al. filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Law Enforcement Action Partnership filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of APA Watch filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Boston University Center for Antiracist Research filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed.Jun 11 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Federal Courts Scholars filed.Aug 16 2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, November 1, 2021.Aug 16 2021 | Brief of respondents Police Officer Pagiel Clark, Shield #28472, et al. filed.Aug 20 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.Aug 23 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York filed.Aug 23 2021 | Brief amici curiae of City of Chicago, et al. filed.Sep 01 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit.Sep 01 2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit has been electronically filed.Sep 08 2021 | ARGUMENT RESCHEDULED FOR Tuesday, October 12, 2021.Sep 15 2021 | The record from the U.S.D.C. Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn) has been electronically filed.Sep 15 2021 | Reply of petitioner Larry Thompson filed. (Distributed)Sep 20 2021 | Sealed record material from the U.S.D.C. Eastern District of New York has been electronically filed.Sep 30 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED, and the time is allotted as follows: 20 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General, and 30 minutes for respondents.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Dan and will try to catch up on the flurry of news from Thursday afternoon, including an update on the Acting Solicitor General and the Court's surprising grant of injunctive relief against New York's eviction procedures. Come for the breaking news, stay to find out how Dan procrastinate and to learn the relevance of Catskills humor to the shadow docket.

After teasing it for months, Neal Katyal, perhaps our nation's finest Supreme Court advocate, joins Amarica's Constitution.  The dramatic rise of a truly great lawyer is a fascinating story, including the case that launched Neal into Supreme Court practice - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.  Later he would become Acting Solicitor General and then move into John Roberts' old chair as the head of the Supreme Court appellate office at Hogan Lovells, Georgetown Law Professor, nationally-known media personality, author including sometimes co-author with Professor Amar, and even a TV actor. There's too much to tell in one episode, so Neal will return next week for analysis of some of today and tomorrow's most compelling legal issues.

QUESTION PRESENTED:(1) Whether the Natural Gas Act delegates to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission certificate-holders the authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent-domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest; and (2) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit properly exercised jurisdiction over this case.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Jan 24 2020 | Application (19A836) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 3, 2020 to March 4, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.Jan 27 2020 | Application (19A836) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 4, 2020.Feb 18 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 23, 2020)Mar 09 2020 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC.Mar 20 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Marcellus Shale Coalition and Pennsylvania Independent Oil & Gas Association filed.Mar 20 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Industrial Energy Consumers of America filed.Mar 23 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC filed.Mar 23 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Pennslvania Manufacturers' Association, et al. filed.Mar 23 2020 | Brief amici curiae of United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, et al. filed.Mar 23 2020 | Waiver of New Jersey Conservation Foundation of right to respond not accepted for filing. (March 24, 2020)Mar 23 2020 | Waiver of right of respondent New Jersey Conservation Foundation to respond filed.Mar 23 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Consumer Energy Alliance filed.Mar 23 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Energy Equipment and Infrastructure Alliance filed.Mar 23 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, American Gas Association, American Petroleum Institute filed.Mar 23 2020 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry filed.Mar 23 2020 | Waiver of right of respondents State of New Jersey; NJ Department of Envrionmental Protection, et al. to respond filed.Apr 01 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.Apr 13 2020 | Response Requested. (Due May 13, 2020)Apr 30 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 13, 2020 to June 12, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Apr 30 2020 | Response to motion from petitioner PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC filed.May 01 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including June 2, 2020, for all respondents.Jun 02 2020 | Brief of respondents State of New Jersey; NJ Department of Envrionmental Protection, et al. in opposition filed.Jun 02 2020 | Waiver of right of respondent New Jersey Conservation Foundation to respond filed.Jun 03 2020 | Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.Jun 09 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.Jun 09 2020 | Reply of petitioners PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC filed. (Distributed)Jun 29 2020 | The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.Dec 09 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Dec 23 2020 | Supplemental brief of respondents State of New Jersey; NJ Department of Envrionmental Protection, et al. filed.Jan 07 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.Feb 03 2021 | Petition GRANTED. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Did the Court of Appeals properly exercise jurisdiction over this case? The case will be set for argument in the April 2021 argument session.Feb 05 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, PennEast Pipeline Company, LLCFeb 08 2021 | Joint motion to set the briefing schedule filed by the parties.Feb 10 2021 | Joint motion to set the briefing schedule GRANTED. Petitioner's brief on the merits will be filed on or before March 1, 2021. Respondents briefs on the merits will be filed on or before March 31, 2021. The reply brief will be filed in compliance with Rule 25.3.Feb 22 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, New Jersey Conservation FoundationMar 01 2021 | Brief of petitioner PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC filed.Mar 01 2021 | Joint appendix (two volumes) filed.Mar 04 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, State of New Jersey; NJ Department of Envrionmental Protection, et al.Mar 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry filed.Mar 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC filed.Mar 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, et al. filed.Mar 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Energy Equipment and Infrastructure Alliance filed.Mar 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Pennslvania Manufacturers' Association and the New Jersey Business & Industry Association filed.Mar 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Mar 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, American Gas Association, American Petroleum Institute filed.Mar 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Marcellus Shale Coalition and Pennsylvania Independent Oil & Gas Association filed.Mar 12 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 28, 2021.Mar 15 2021 | Record requested.Mar 30 2021 | CIRCULATEDMar 31 2021 | Brief of respondent New Jersey Conservation Foundation filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief of respondents New Jersey, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.Apr 07 2021 | Brief amici curiae of State of Oregon, et al. filed. (Distributed)Apr 07 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed. (Distributed)Apr 07 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Council of State Governments, et al. filed. (Distributed)Apr 16 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.Apr 16 2021 | Reply of petitioner PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC filed. (Distributed)Apr 28 2021 | Argued. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C.; and Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Jeremy M. Feigenbaum, Counsel to the Attorney General, Trenton, N. J.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, which holds that public school officials may regulate speech that would materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school, applies to student speech that occurs off campus. DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Aug 28 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2020)Sep 21 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Sep 28 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 30, 2020.Oct 01 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Pennsylvania School Boards Association and Pennsylvania Principals Association filed.Oct 01 2020 | Brief amici curiae of National School Boards Association, et al. filed.Nov 30 2020 | Brief of respondents B.L., a minor, by and through her father Lawrence Levy and her mother Betty Lou Levy in opposition filed.Dec 14 2020 | Reply of petitioner Mahanoy Area School District filed.Dec 16 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.Jan 08 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Feb 22 2021 | Brief of petitioner Mahanoy Area School District filed.Feb 22 2021 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Feb 24 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Cyberbullying Research Center, et al. filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National School Boards Association, et al. filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Massachusetts, et al. in support of neither party filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Nation Education Association in support of neither party filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Association of Pupil Services Administrators and Pennsylvania Association of Pupil Services Administrators filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Pennsylvania School Boards Association and Pennsylvania Principals Association filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of First Amendment and Education Law Scholars filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Huntsville, Alabama City Board of Education, et al. filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice in support of neither party filed.Mar 12 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 28, 2021.Mar 15 2021 | Record requested.Mar 24 2021 | Brief of respondent B.L., a minor, by and through her father Lawrence Levy and her mother Betty Lou Levy filed.Mar 26 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 29 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.Mar 30 2021 | CIRCULATEDMar 30 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Parents Defending Education filed. (Distributed)Mar 30 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Liberty Justice Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Life Legal Defense Foundation filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Alliance Defending Freedom and Christian Legal Society filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Independent Women's Law Center filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of College Athlete Advocates filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Law and Education Professors filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation and The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The National Women's Law Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Jane Bambauer, Ashutosh Bhagwat, and Eugene Volokh filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of School Discipline Professors filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of States of Louisiana, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of First Liberty Institute filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Student School Board Members filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Advancement Project, Juvenile Law Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Student Press Law Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of VanHo Law filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Mary Beth Tinker & John Tinker filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of HISD Student Congress, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Teachers, School Administrators, and the National Council of Teachers of English filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed. (Distributed)Apr 05 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.Apr 16 2021 | Reply of petitioner Mahanoy Area School District filed. (Distributed)Apr 28 2021 | Argued. For petitioner: Lisa S. Blatt, Washington, D. C.; and Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: David D. Cole, of Washington, D. C.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether, in order to qualify for a hardship exemption under Section 7545(o)(9)(B)(i) of the Renewable Fuel Standards, a small refinery needs to receive uninterrupted, continuous hardship exemptions for every year since 2011.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Sep 04 2020 | Motion (20M25) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.Sep 04 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2020)Sep 16 2020 | MOTION (20M25) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.Oct 13 2020 | Motion (20M25) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.Nov 04 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2020 to December 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Nov 10 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, 2020, for all respondents.Nov 11 2020 | Brief amici curiae of States of Wyoming, et al. filed.Nov 12 2020 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Countrymark Refining and Logistics, LLC.Nov 12 2020 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers.Dec 08 2020 | Brief of Federal Respondent in opposition filed.Dec 09 2020 | Brief of respondents Renewable Fuels Association, American Coalition for Ethanol, National Corn Growers Association, National Farmers Union in opposition filed.Dec 22 2020 | Reply of petitioners HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)Dec 23 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.Jan 08 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers GRANTED.Jan 08 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Countrymark Refining and Logistics, LLC GRANTED.Jan 08 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Feb 11 2021 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC, et al.Feb 22 2021 | Brief of petitioners HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC, et al. filed.Feb 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Countrymark Refining and Logistics, LLC filed. (Corrected brief to be submitted - 3/12/21)Feb 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Countrymark Refining and Logistics, LLC filed. (Corrected brief submitted - March 16, 2021).Mar 01 2021 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of States of Wyoming, et al., filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Small Refineries Coalition filed.Mar 12 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 27, 2021.Mar 15 2021 | Record requested.Mar 22 2021 | The record received from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. Sealed documents in this record has been received and electronically filed.Mar 24 2021 | Brief of Federal Respondent filed.Mar 24 2021 | Brief of respondents Renewable Fuels Association, et al. filed.Mar 24 2021 | Motion for divided argument filed by the Acting Solicitor General.Mar 30 2021 | CIRCULATEDMar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Biodiesel Board filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Advanced Biofuels Association filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Growth Energy and American Farm Bureau Federation filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of States of Iowa, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas and Producers of Renewables United for Integrity Truth and Transparency filed. (Distributed)Apr 05 2021 | Motion for divided argument filed by respondents GRANTED.Apr 15 2021 | Reply of petitioners HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)Apr 27 2021 | Argued. For petitioners: Peter D. Keisler, Washington, D. C. For federal respondent: Christopher G. Michel, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For private respondents: Matthew W. Morrison, Washington, D. C.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the exacting scrutiny the Supreme Court has long required of laws that abridge the freedoms of speech and association outside the election context – as called for by NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson and its progeny – can be satisfied absent any showing that a blanket governmental demand for the individual identities and addresses of major donors to private nonprofit organizations is narrowly tailored to an asserted law-enforcement interest.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)May 28 2019 | Application (18A1224) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 27, 2019 to August 26, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.May 28 2019 | Application (18A1224) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 26, 2019.Aug 26 2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 25, 2019)Sep 06 2019 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Americans for Prosperity Foundation.Sep 09 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 25, 2019 to October 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.Sep 11 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 25, 2019.Sep 24 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.Sep 24 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed.Sep 24 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amici curiae of Pacific Research Institute, Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability filed.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund filed. VIDEDSep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of The Buckeye Institute filed.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amici curiae of Public Interest Legal Foundation, Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Foundation for Michigan Freedom and Texas Public Policy Foundation filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers filed.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Hispanic Leadership Fund filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amici curiae of Philanthropy Roundtable, et al. filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amici curiae of 24 Family Policy Organizations filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Council on American-Islamic Relations filed.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Public Integrity Alliance filed.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. filed.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amici curiae of States of Arizona et al. filed.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of American Target Advertising, Inc. filed.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Free Speech filed. VIDED.Sep 25 2019 | Brief amici curiae of Free Speech Coalition, et al. filed. VIDED.Oct 03 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2019 to November 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.Oct 07 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 25, 2019.Nov 25 2019 | Brief of respondent Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California in opposition filed. VIDED.Dec 10 2019 | Reply of petitioner Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed.Dec 11 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.Jan 13 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.Jan 21 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.Feb 14 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.Feb 24 2020 | The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.Nov 24 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. VIDED.Dec 09 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.Dec 09 2020 | Supplemental brief of respondent Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Jan 08 2021 | Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 19-255 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.Jan 08 2021 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-251. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-251. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”Jan 29 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Thomas More Law Center (in 19-255).Feb 05 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Americans for Prosperity FoundationFeb 22 2021 | Brief of petitioner Thomas More Law Center filed (in 19-255).Feb 22 2021 | Joint appendix filed (in 19-255).Feb 22 2021 | Brief of petitioner Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed (in 19-251).Feb 22 2021 | Joint appendix filed (in 19-251). (Statement of costs filed)Feb 23 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of James Madison Center for Free Speech filed. VIDEDFeb 24 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Council on American-Islamic Relations filed (in 19-251).Feb 24 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, Southeastern Legal Foundation, and Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed. VIDED.Feb 24 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute and Rio Grande Foundation filed. VIDED.Feb 25 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Concerned Women for America, et al. filed. VIDED.Feb 26 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Taxpayers Union Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED.Feb 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Randy Elf filed. VIDED.Feb 26 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Public Interest Legal Foundation and Foundation for Michigan Freedom filed. VIDED.Feb 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Target Advertising, Inc. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Amicus brief of Philanthropy Roundtable, Independent Women's Forum, and People United for Privacy Foundation not accepted for filing. (March 02, 2021 - corrected brief to be submitted.)Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Philanthropy Roundtable filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Amicus brief of The Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. not accepted for filing. (March 02, 2021) (efiling will be resubmitted)Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Center for Equal Opportunity filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Citizen Power Initiatives for China filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The American Legislative Exchange Council filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Floyd Abrams Institute for Freedom of Expression at Yale Law School in support of neither party filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Free Speech filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Association of National Advertisers (ANA) and the ANA Non-Profit Federation filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Hispanic Leadership Fund, et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Free Speech Coalition, et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Legacy Foundation filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Independent Women's Law Center filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Nonprofit Alliance Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of China Aid Association filed. VIDEDMar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Thomas More Society filed. VIDEDMar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of State of Arizona, et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Congressman John Sarbanes and Democracy 21 in support of neither party filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Protect The 1st and Pacific Research Institute filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States supporting vacatur and remand filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Citizens United and Citizens United Foundation filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers, et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Senator Mitch McConnell filed. VIDED.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Freedom Foundation filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Buckeye Institute, et al. filed. VIDED.Mar 09 2021 | Application (20A148) to file respondent's consolidated brief on the merits in excess of the word limit, submitted to Justice Kagan. VIDED.Mar 11 2021 | Motion for divided argument and enlargement of time for oral argument filed by petitioners. VIDED.Mar 12 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 26, 2021. VIDED.Mar 12 2021 | Application (20A148) granted by Justice Kagan to file respondent's consolidated brief on the merits in excess of the word limit. The brief may not exceed 15,000 words. VIDED.Mar 12 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.Mar 15 2021 | Record requested.Mar 15 2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.Mar 24 2021 | Brief of Matthew Rodriquez, Acting Attorney General of California not accepted for filing. (Corrected and reprinted brief submitted - March 25, 2021)Mar 24 2021 | Brief of respondent Matthew Rodriquez, Acting Attorney General of California filed (Mar. 25, 2021). VIDED.Mar 30 2021 | CIRCULATEDMar 30 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The California Association of Nonprofits filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of States of New York, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of CharityWatch filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Scholars of the Law of Non-Profit Organizations filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Public Citizen and Public Citizen Foundation filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of U.S. Senators filed (in 19-251). (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Amicus brief of Legal Historians not accepted for filing. (April 06, 2021 - Corrected brief submitted.)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Legal Historians filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Council of Nonprofits filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Amicus brief of Campaign Legal Center, et al. not accepted for filing. (Corrected brief submitted)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Campaign Legal Center, et al. filed. VIDED. (April 17, 2021). (Distributed)Apr 05 2021 | Motion of petitioners for divided argument is DENIED; motion of petitioners for enlargement of time for oral argument is GRANTED, and the time is allotted as follows: 30 minutes for petitioners, 10 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General, and 30 minutes for respondent.Apr 05 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.Apr 16 2021 | Reply of petitioner Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed (in 19-251). (Distributed)Apr 17 2021 | Motion to file the reply brief out of time filed by petitioner Thomas More Law Center (in 19-255). (Distributed)Apr 24 2021 | Motion of Thomas More Law Center to file a reply brief out of time GRANTED.Apr 26 2021 | Argued. For petitioners: Derek L. Shaffer, Washington, D. C. For United States, as amicus curiae: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Aimee A. Feinberg, Deputy Solicitor General, Sacramento, Cal. VIDED.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether a defendant in a patent infringement action who assigned the patent, or is in privity with an assignor of the patent, may have a defense of invalidity heard on the merits.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Sep 30 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)Oct 14 2020 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Minerva Surgical, Inc.Nov 05 2020 | Brief of respondents Hologic, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.Nov 05 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Professors filed.Nov 05 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Engine Advocacy filed.Nov 24 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.Nov 24 2020 | Rescheduled.Nov 24 2020 | Reply of petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc. filed.Dec 09 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.Jan 08 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Feb 22 2021 | Brief of petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc. filed.Feb 22 2021 | Joint appendix volumes 1 and 2 with supplemental appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Feb 22 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Minerva Surgical, Inc.Feb 25 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.Feb 26 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Engine Advocacy filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Law Professors filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed in support of neither party.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association filed in support of neither party.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States in support of neither party filed.Mar 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of New York City Bar Association in support of neither party filed.Mar 12 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 21, 2021.Mar 15 2021 | Record requested.Mar 24 2021 | Brief of respondents Hologic, Inc., et al. filed.Mar 26 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.Mar 30 2021 | CIRCULATEDMar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United Therapeutics Corp. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed. (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Leading Technology Composites, Inc. and Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC filed. (Distributed)Apr 05 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.Apr 07 2021 | Reply of petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Apr 21 2021 | Argued. For petitioner: Robert N. Hochman, Chicago, Ill. For United States, as amicus curiae: Morgan L. Ratner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Matthew M. Wolf, Washington, D. C.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit alone has held, district courts “lack[] discretion to deny or reduce” appellate costs deemed “taxable” in district court under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39(e).DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Sep 10 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 14, 2020)Sep 28 2020 | Waiver of right of respondents Site59.com L.L.C. and Travelocity.com L.P. (n/k/a TVL LP) to respond filed.Sep 28 2020 | Waiver of right of respondents Travelweb, LLC, et al. to respond filed.Sep 29 2020 | Waiver of right of respondents Expedia, Inc., et al. to respond filed.Oct 21 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.Nov 02 2020 | Response Requested. (Due December 2, 2020)Dec 02 2020 | Brief of respondents Hotels.com L.P., et al. in opposition filed.Dec 16 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.Dec 16 2020 | Reply of petitioner City of San Antonio, Texas, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated Texas municipalities filed. (Distributed)Jan 08 2021 | Petition GRANTED.Feb 18 2021 | Motion for an extension of time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits filed.Feb 18 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is granted and the time is extended to and including February 24, 2021.Feb 24 2021 | Brief of petitioner City of San Antonio, Texas, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated Texas municipalities filed.Feb 24 2021 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Mar 03 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Association of Counties, National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors, International City/County Management Association, and International Municipal Lawyers Association filed.Mar 12 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 21, 2021.Mar 15 2021 | Record requested.Mar 15 2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.Mar 26 2021 | Brief of respondents Expedia, Inc., Hotels.com, L.P., Hotwire, Inc., Orbitz, LLC, Trip Network, Inc., Internetwork Publishing Corp., Travelnow.com, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Mar 29 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.Mar 30 2021 | CIRCULATEDApr 05 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument DENIED.Apr 09 2021 | Reply of petitioner City of San Antonio, Texas, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated Texas municipalities filed. (Distributed)Apr 21 2021 | Argued. For petitioner: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex. For respondents: David B. Salmons, Washington, D. C.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether either Article III or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 permits a damages class action when the vast majority of the class suffered no actual injury, let alone an injury anything like what the class representative suffered.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Sep 02 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 8, 2020)Sep 30 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 8, 2020 to November 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Oct 02 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 6, 2020.Oct 08 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association filed.Oct 08 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.Nov 06 2020 | Brief of respondent Sergio L. Ramirez in opposition filed.Nov 24 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.Nov 24 2020 | Reply of petitioner TransUnion LLC filed. (Distributed)Dec 16 2020 | Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.Dec 23 2020 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Sergio L. RamirezDec 23 2020 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, TransUnion LLCFeb 01 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 30, 2021.Feb 01 2021 | Brief of petitioner TransUnion LLC filed.Feb 01 2021 | Joint appendix (Volumes I, II, & III) filed.Feb 04 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.Feb 04 2021 | Record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of eBay Inc., et al. filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Home Depot, Inc. et al. filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Association of Manufacturers, et al. filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Professional Background Screening Association filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Consumer Reporting Association, Inc. filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of ACA International filed.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of the United States in support of neither party filed.Feb 22 2021 | CIRCULATED.Mar 03 2021 | Brief of Sergio L. Ramirez not accepted for filing. (March 05, 2021)(Dupilicate submission)Mar 03 2021 | Brief of respondent Sergio L. Ramirez filed. (Distributed)Mar 05 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.Mar 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center filed. (Distributed)Mar 09 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Public Justice filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Consumer Advocates filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Complex Litigation Law Professors filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Impact Fund, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., and 24 Civil Rights Organizations filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of National Consumer Law Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Public Citizen and Public Citizen Foundation filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws filed. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of UC Berkeley Center for Consumer Law and Economic Justice, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 19 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.Mar 19 2021 | Reply of petitioner TransUnion LLC filed. (Distributed)Mar 30 2021 | Argued. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. For United States, as amicus curiae: Nicole F. Reaves, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Samuel Issacharoff, New York, N. Y.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:1) Whether a defendant in a securities class action may rebut the presumption of classwide reliance recognized in Basic Inc. v. Levinson by pointing to the generic nature of the alleged misstatements in showing that the statements had no impact on the price of the security, even though that evidence is also relevant to the substantive element of materiality; and (2) whether a defendant seeking to rebut the Basic presumption has only a burden of production or also the ultimate burden of persuasion.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Aug 21 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2020)Aug 25 2020 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al.Sep 08 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2020 to October 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Sep 08 2020 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, et al.Sep 09 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 23, 2020.Sep 24 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.Sep 24 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.Sep 24 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Officials and Law Professors filed.Sep 24 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of The Society for Corporate Governance filed.Sep 24 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Securities and Financial Markets Association, et al. filed.Sep 24 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Financial Economists filed.Oct 21 2020 | Brief of respondents Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, et al. in opposition filed.Oct 21 2020 | Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from November 4, 2020 to November 17, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Oct 26 2020 | Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until November 17, 2020 granted.Nov 17 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.Nov 17 2020 | Reply of petitioners Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Dec 07 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.Dec 11 2020 | Petition GRANTED.Jan 14 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, et al.Jan 14 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al.Jan 25 2021 | Brief of petitioners Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. filed.Jan 25 2021 | Joint appendix (2 volumes & 1 supplemental) filed. (Statement of costs filed)Feb 01 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 29, 2021.Feb 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United States support of neither party filed.Feb 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.Feb 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American International Group, Inc. et al. filed.Feb 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Financial Economists filed.Feb 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.Feb 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Securities and Financial Markets Association, et al. filed.Feb 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Officials and Law Professors filed.Feb 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Society for Corporate Governance filed.Feb 04 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit.Feb 11 2021 | Record from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit, along with SEALED material been electronically filed.Feb 11 2021 | Record from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York is electronic and located on Pacer, with the exception of 1 Box of Sealed records.Feb 22 2021 | CIRCULATED.Feb 24 2021 | Brief of respondents Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, et al. filed. (Distributed)Feb 26 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.Mar 03 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Better Markets, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Officials filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Financial Economists filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Evidence Law Professors filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Institutional Investors filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Professors of Securities Law and Complex Litigation filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amici curiae of State of New Mexico et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Public Citizen and Public Citizen Foundation filed. (Distributed)Mar 03 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys filed. (Distributed)Mar 08 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.Mar 19 2021 | Reply of petitioners Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 29 2021 | Argued. For petitioners: Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D. C. For United States, as amicus curiae: Sopan Joshi, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Thomas C. Goldstein, Bethesda, Md.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erroneously held, in conflict with decisions of other circuits and general antitrust principles, that the National Collegiate Athletic Association eligibility rules regarding compensation of student-athletes violate federal antitrust law.DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Oct 15 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2020)Nov 09 2020 | Brief of respondents Shawne Alston, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.Nov 13 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Sam C. Ehrlich filed. VIDED.Nov 18 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Law And Business School Professors filed.Nov 18 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Economists filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Nov 24 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.Nov 24 2020 | Reply of petitioner National Collegiate Athletic Association filed. (Distributed)Dec 16 2020 | Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 20-520 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.Dec 16 2020 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 20-512. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 20-512. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”Dec 21 2020 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners National Collegiate Athletic Association. VIDED.Jan 04 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, National Collegiate Athletic AssociationJan 08 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Shawne Alston, et al.Jan 11 2021 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED. VIDED.Jan 27 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Sam C. Ehrlich in support of neither party filed. VIDED.Feb 01 2021 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 31, 2021. VIDED.Feb 01 2021 | Brief of petitioner National Collegiate Athletic Association filed (in 20-512).Feb 01 2021 | Brief of petitioners American Athletic Conference, et al. filed (in 20-520).Feb 04 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.Feb 04 2021 | Record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. Part of the record is SEALED and has been electronically filed.Feb 05 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, The Big Ten Conference, Inc.Feb 05 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Federation Of State High School Associations filed (in 20-512).Feb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Council on Education and Ten Other Higher Education Associations filed. VIDED.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Thomas B. Nachbar filed. VIDEDFeb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Law And Business School Professors filed. VIDED.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Economists filed. VIDED.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Georgia, et al. filed. VIDED.Feb 08 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Former Student-Athletes filed. VIDED.Feb 18 2021 | Application (20A145) to extend the time to file the reply briefs on the merits from 2 p.m., March 19, 2021 to 2 p.m., March 21, 2021, submitted to Justice Kagan. VIDED.Feb 22 2021 | CIRCULATED.Feb 24 2021 | Application (20A145) denied by Justice Kagan. VIDED.Mar 03 2021 | Brief of respondents Shawne Alston, et al. filed. VIDED (Distributed)Mar 09 2021 | Brief amici curiae of 65 Professors of Law, Business, Economics, and Sports Management filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Advocates for Minor Leaguers filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Historians filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Sports Economists filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Former NCAA Executives filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of African American Antitrust Lawyers filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Antitrust Institute filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Dr. Ellen J. Staurowsky, Dr. Eddie Comeaux, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of O'Bannon Plaintiff Class Representatives filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Players Associations of the National Football League, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Open Markets Institute, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 10 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws filed. VIDED. (Distributed)Mar 19 2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. VIDED.Mar 19 2021 | Reply of petitioner National Collegiate Athletic Association filed (in 20-512). (Distributed)Mar 19 2021 | Reply of petitioner The Big Ten Conference, Inc. filed (in 20-520). (Distributed)Mar 31 2021 | Argued. For petitioners: Seth P. Waxman, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Jeffrey L. Kessler, New York, N. Y.; and Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) VIDED.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Neal Katyal is the former Acting Solicitor General of the United States under Barack Obama, a distinguished lawyer who has argued 41 cases before the Supreme Court and the Paul Saunders Professor of National Security Law at Georgetown University. In this episode, Heilemann and Katyal explore all things SCOTUS. They discuss the late RBG, the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, the high stakes at play and why Neal is still optimistic about the future of the Supreme Court. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Ian Gershengorn, former Acting Solicitor General of the United States and Professor Barbara Creel speak to us about the recent Supreme Court case, McGirt v. Oklahoma. Gershengorn served as Jimcy McGirt's attorney and offers his experience in preparing and presenting the case. We discuss case strategy and the opinion delivered by Justice Gorsuch.Professor Creel, a member of the Pueblo of Jemez, has also served as an assistant federal public defender and brings her expertise in Indian Country criminal defense to our discussion. We discuss the petition brought forward by Jimcy McGirt, Indian sovereignty and the potential impact of this decision.Want to get involved with the Criminal Justice Section? Join us! https://www.americanbar.org/membership/join-now 

Join us as legal scholar and former Principal Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal discusses all the new legal challenges facing the 2020 election. Moderated by business legend and co-founder of Springboard Enterprises Kay Koplovitz, the two will lead a fascinating conversation, headlined by pressing issues such as mail-in ballot and combating the spreading of misinformation. General Neal Katyal served as Acting Solicitor General of the United States, where he argued several major Supreme Court cases involving a variety of issues, such as his successful defense of the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, his victorious defense of former Attorney General John Ashcroft for alleged abuses in the war on terror, his unanimous victory against eight states who sued the nation's leading power plants for contributing to global warming, and a variety of other matters. As Acting Solicitor General, Neal was responsible for representing the federal government of the United States in all appellate matters before the U.S. Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals throughout the nation. He served as Counsel of Record hundreds of times in the U.S. Supreme Court. He was also the only head of the Solicitor General's office to argue a case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, on the important question of whether certain aspects of the human genome were patentable. Ms. Kay Koplovitz is the founder and former Chairman & CEO of USA Networks, the SyFy Channel (formerly Sci-Fi Channel), and USA Networks International, today a multi-billion-dollar cable television network. Ms. Koplovitz ran the network for 21 years before stepping down in 1998. As founder of USA Networks, Kay is the visionary who created the business model for cable networks by introducing the concept of two revenue streams: licensing and advertising. To RSVP for upcoming events, visit our events page at: https://www.thecommongoodus.org --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Neal Katyal is a former Acting Solicitor General of the United States, and currently runs one of the largest Supreme Court practices in the world at an international law firm, where he occupies the role formerly held by now Chief Justice John Roberts. He joins Sophia on "Work In Progress" to share how he became a lawyer and what it's really like to argue in front of the Supreme Court, and discuss his thoughts on the impeachment trial and President Trump. Executive Producers: Sophia Bush & Sim SarnaSupervising Producer: Allison BresnickAssociate Producer: Caitlin LeeEditors: Josh Windisch and Matt SasakiMusic written by Jack Garratt and produced by Mark FosterArtwork by Kimi SelfridgeThis show is brought to you by Cloud10 & Brilliant Anatomy, and powered by Simplecast.This episode is sponsored by Calm, Wantable, and Four Sigmatic.

On Wednesday, January 15, Business Forward Foundation welcomed former Acting Solicitor General of the United States Neal Katyal for a briefing on the facts and legal theories behind the impeachment of President Trump, as well as other threats to rule of law in the U.S.

"Imagine if it had worked." So begins former acting solicitor general Neal Katyal's new book "Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump." Katyal argues that if President Trump's solicitation of personal political favors from Ukraine had gone undetected until after the 2020 election, our democracy's legitimacy would have been undermined. For that reason, he says that the President's actions constitute an abuse of power that the Constitution's framers specifically deemed impeachable. As the full House of Representatives prepares to vote on two articles of impeachment next week, we'll talk to Katyal about why he thinks legal precedent and the factual record support removing Trump from office.

On Monday 30 September we hosted a panel debate on checks and balances required for maintaining democracy and the rule of law with two distinguished panellists: Neal Katyal – former Acting Solicitor-General of the United States under President Obama Lord (David) Anderson KBE QC – cross-bench life peer, former Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation (UK), and barrister specialising in EU, human rights and public law The event was chaired by Jessica Simor QC, one of the country’s leading specialists in public/regulatory, EU and human rights law. Challenges and opportunities Drawing on experience from the US and the UK, our panellists addressed the following issues: What are the key challenges and opportunities for the rule of law in contemporary democratic societies? Does the UK ultimately need a written Constitution, in order to guarantee an effective system of checks and balances? What are the key challenges facing democratic institutions as they seek to balance executive powers with a constitutional order based on precedent? The panel discussion is followed by questions from our invited live audience of local students, academics and specialists in the field. The event was streamed live on 30 September.

In this episode, we spend time with Paul D. Clement, who served as the 43rd Solicitor General of the United States from June 2005 until June 2008. Before his confirmation as Solicitor General, he served as Acting Solicitor General for nearly a year and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General for over three years. He has argued nearly 100 cases before the United States Supreme Court. The American Law Institute would like to thank Oyez for excerpted portions of Supreme Court oral arguments. This material is released under the Creative Commons license. Oyez is a free law project from Cornell’s Legal Information Institute, Justia, and Chicago-Kent College of Law. Listeners may learn more about Oyez or listen to full oral arguments online at oyez.org.

In this bonus podcast episode, listen to Ari Melber's reporting and analysis on the Mueller report, including a special break down of the two paths forward, outlined by Mueller in the Russia probe report and why Mueller may have referred to both the Congressional power of impeachment and the possibility for former Presidents to be indicted. Plus, listen to Ari Melber's interview with former Acting Solicitor General, Neal Katyal, who wrote the DOJ rules governing a Special Counsel and why he believes Trump is worse than Nixon. Then, a break down of how Trump’s Attorney General Bill Barr was busted for misleading the public. 

Renato and Patti discuss the recent filings by federal prosecutors in New York and Special Counsel Robert Mueller, including the conclusion by federal prosecutors that Donald Trump directed Michael Cohen to commit federal crimes. They are joined by Neal Katyal, the former Acting Solicitor General who authored the Special Counsel regulations.

Renato and Patti discuss the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the United States Supreme Court, including how he would impact the Court's rulings and recent controversies that arose during his confirmation hearing, including allegations that Kavanaugh lied under oath. They are joined by Neal Katyal, the former Acting Solicitor General who has argued many important cases before the Supreme Court.

The courts have proven a key battleground in the fights of the Trump era. On immigration, voting rights, freedom of religion and more, legal advocates are taking on federal policy – and, often, winning. What are these new legal strategies? Will they last? And how can issues of democracy, justice, and the rule of law become burning matters of public – not just legal – debate?   Alexander Heffner, Host, The Open Mind on PBS Becca Heller, Director and Co-Founder, IRAP; Visiting Clinical Lecturer in law, Yale Law School Jameel Jaffer, Executive Director, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Neal Katyal, Paul and Patricia Saunders Professor of National Security Law, Georgetown Law; former Acting Solicitor General of the United States Faiza Patel, Co-Director, Liberty & National Security Program, Brennan Center for Justice Elizabeth Wydra, President, Constitutional Accountability Center

West Coast Cookbook & Speakeasy is Now Open! 8am-9am PT/ 11am-Noon ET for our especially special Daily Specials; Blue Moon Spirits Fridays!Starting off in the Bistro Cafe, former U.S. Acting Solicitor General, Neal Katyal, slams Trump's former lawyer, John Dowd offering pardons as, “mind-blowingly stupid.”Then, on the rest of the menu, an 18-year-old in Bellevue, Washington has been arrested for setting fire to a local mosque, the second time it's been burned since January of last year; far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer is kicked out of the Pulse nightclub shooting trial; and, the FBI started looking into Trump's shady Russia-linked business deals as early as 2014.After the break, we move to the Chef's Table where Trump is gaslighting the public, and you can see it in the way he fires cabinet members; and, Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo wasted no time calling NFL star Michael Bennet ‘morally corrupt,' but is strangely quiet on police brutality.All that and more, on West Coast Cookbook & Speakeasy with Chef de Cuisine, Justice Putnam.Bon Appetit!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~“Structural linguistics is a bitterly divided and unhappy profession, and a large number of its practitioners spend many nights drowning their sorrows in Ouisghian Zodahs.” ― Douglas Adams "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Show Notes & Links: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/30/1753137/-West-Coast-Cookbook-Speakeasy-Daily-Special-Blue-Moon-Spirits-Fridays

It's our first emergency podcast! Right after the full Fourth Circuit heard oral arguments in the Muslim Travel Ban appeal, the Versus Trump co-hosts hopped on the line to do a deep-dive into the argument. The podcast includes audio clips of many key moments from the oral argument audio.We start off by analyzing what happened when Acting Solicitor General Jeff Wall got up to the podium to defend the travel ban [1:20-19:50]. We point out that the court was overwhelmingly populated by Democratic appointees, and they were not afraid to ask hard questions—like how the court could possibly ignore the President's repeated statements that he wanted to implement a Muslim ban. We thought that the Acting Solicitor General did his very best to offer up appealing reasons for upholding the ban, but we all thought that, as Charlie said, the SG made a fantastic argument "about a case that isn't this case." Ultimately, we doubt his arguments will hold up in light of the extraordinary and unusual clarity of the President's anti-Muslim rhetoric.We then break down the argument of plaintiff's counsel, Omar Jadwat of the ACLU, who was arguing that the Muslim travel ban was unconstitutional [19:50-30:30]. We wonder why Jadwat wasn't more forceful in pointing out how extraordinary and unusual this case is, and why he seemed to want to evade questions that could have been answered straightforwardly by pointing directly to the President's own clear, anti-Muslim statements. Still, given the strength of the plaintiffs' case and the left-leaning majority on the court, we predict that the court will agree with the plaintiffs, hold that the Muslim ban was unconstitutionally adopted, and continue to prohibit the federal government from enforcing the controversial executive order. We end with a few final thoughts and a prediction about how the case will come out. [30:30-end.] See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Just a few weeks into the era of President-elect Donald Trump, and already there is a lot of bruising around the edges of the Constitution. The past few weeks have brought talk of Muslim registries, jail time for flag burners, restrictions on voting and the sweet mystery of the Emoluments Clause. This week, we sit down with U.S. Senator Chris Coons to discuss how much of this talk we should take seriously, and where the true threats to Americans’ constitutional protections lie. We also speak with Neal Katyal, former Acting Solicitor General of the United States, about the 1944 Supreme Court decision that upheld the internment of Japanese-Americans. In 2011, Katyal issued an official apology for the role of one of his predecessors in that case. Korematsu v United Stateshas been in the news again recently, after one Trump surrogate cited it as a “precedent” for a possible Trump Administration program that would require the registration of immigrants from a handful of predominantly Muslim countries. Transcripts of Amicus are available to Slate Plus members. Consider signing up today! Members get bonus segments, exclusive member-only podcasts, and more. Sign up for a free trial here. Amicus is brought to you by the Great Courses Plus, a video learning service with a large library of lectures all taught by award-winning professors. Get a free month of unlimited access when you sign up at TheGreatCoursesPlus.com/amicus. And by First Republic Bank. At First Republic, they take the time to know your business and customize solutions to help you reach your goals. Visit FirstRepublic.com today to hear what their clients say about them. Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Our email is amicus@slate.com. Follow us on Facebook here. Podcast production by Tony Field. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Just a few weeks into the era of President-elect Donald Trump, and already there is a lot of bruising around the edges of the Constitution. The past few weeks have brought talk of Muslim registries, jail time for flag burners, restrictions on voting and the sweet mystery of the Emoluments Clause. This week, we sit down with U.S. Senator Chris Coons to discuss how much of this talk we should take seriously, and where the true threats to Americans’ constitutional protections lie. We also speak with Neal Katyal, former Acting Solicitor General of the United States, about the 1944 Supreme Court decision that upheld the internment of Japanese-Americans. In 2011, Katyal issued an official apology for the role of one of his predecessors in that case. Korematsu v United Stateshas been in the news again recently, after one Trump surrogate cited it as a “precedent” for a possible Trump Administration program that would require the registration of immigrants from a handful of predominantly Muslim countries. Transcripts of Amicus are available to Slate Plus members. Consider signing up today! Members get bonus segments, exclusive member-only podcasts, and more. Sign up for a free trial here. Amicus is brought to you by the Great Courses Plus, a video learning service with a large library of lectures all taught by award-winning professors. Get a free month of unlimited access when you sign up at TheGreatCoursesPlus.com/amicus. And by First Republic Bank. At First Republic, they take the time to know your business and customize solutions to help you reach your goals. Visit FirstRepublic.com today to hear what their clients say about them. Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Our email is amicus@slate.com. Follow us on Facebook here. Podcast production by Tony Field. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Recorded just four days after the SCOTUS ruling, this episode features a wide-ranging discussion of the cases and history behind the Marriage Equality ruling. Featuring the legal dream team that helped make this a reality, former Solicitor General Ted Olson and star litigator David Boies. Neal Katyal, former Acting Solicitor General, moderates the conversation.