POPULARITY
******Support the channel******Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenterPayPal: paypal.me/thedissenterPayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuyPayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9lPayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpzPayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9mPayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao ******Follow me on******Website: https://www.thedissenter.net/The Dissenter Goodreads list: https://shorturl.at/7BMoBFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/Twitter: https://x.com/TheDissenterYT This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Vlasta Sikimić is an Assistant Professor at the Eindhoven University of Technology. Her research focus is on Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of AI, Empirical Philosophy, Logic, Science Policy, and Animal Ethics. More specifically, she works on data-driven approaches to optimization of scientific reasoning. Previously, she worked at the Weizsäcker Center (University of Tübingen), the Institute for Philosophy of the Faculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade), she was an associate member of the Laboratory for Experimental Psychology (University of Belgrade), etc. In this episode, we start by talking about cognitive diversity in science. We discuss what it is, as well as epistemic diversity. We discuss whether political diversity is important, and how to achieve cognitive diversity. We then delve into the ethics of AI, and talk about ethical principles and guidelines for AI, high-risk AI systems, and robust and accountable AI.--A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, BERNARDO SEIXAS, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, PER KRAULIS, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, BR, MASOUD ALIMOHAMMADI, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, LUCY, MANVIR SINGH, PETRA WEIMANN, CAROLA FEEST, STARRY, MAURO JÚNIOR, 航 豊川, TONY BARRETT, BENJAMIN GELBART, NIKOLAI VISHNEVSKY, STEVEN GANGESTAD, AND TED FARRIS!A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, AL NICK ORTIZ, NICK GOLDEN, AND CHRISTINE GLASS!AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, BOGDAN KANIVETS, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!
For today's episode, host Josh Sidman is joined by Teun van Sambeek. Our conversation took place, and was recorded in, April of 2025.Mr. Van Sambeek is an IT professional and entrepreneur. After founding multiple companies, he decided to move to Africa to begin building affordable housing. This led to the founding of Bentoniq, a real estate development company that mass produces affordable housing in Sub-Saharan Africa. Teun is also the founder of the 1coinH system, an alternative monetary system. He received two master's: one in real estate development from the University of Amsterdam and the other in Construction Engineering Technologies from the Eindhoven University of Technology. Mr van Sambeek joined Economy 2.0 to discuss the security and privacy of blockchain technology; how alternative monetary systems can avoid inflation via money printing; and how his monetary system can replicate UBI without spiking inflation. To check out more of our content, including our research and policy tools, visit our website: https://www.hgsss.org/
In this episode, Bijan Elahi will share with us the methodology you should follow to start your Risk Management Project. On some of my consulting projects, I ask people if they can send me their Risk Management File, which usually follows by “I don't have one” and then by “How can we create one?”. So Today Bijan Elahi who is an expert on risk management will explain the best way to start such project. Who is Bijan Elahi? Bijan Elahi has worked in risk management for medical devices for over 30 years at the largest medical device companies in the world, as well as small startups. He is a Technical Fellow, and an affiliate professor at Drexel University. Previously he served as the Medtronic corporate Advisor on safety risk management of medical devices. Bijan is a lecturer at Eindhoven University of Technology (Netherlands), where he teaches risk management to doctoral students in engineering. At the invitation of the FDA, he teaches a graduate course on medical device risk management at Drexel University (Philadelphia, USA). Bijan Elahi is the founder of MedTech Safety, Inc., an education and advisory company. He has educated over 10,000 individuals worldwide with outstanding results. Bijan is a frequently invited speaker at international professional conferences, and is also a contributor to ISO 14971, the international standard on the application of risk management to medical devices. He is the author of the best-selling medical book: Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices, published by Elsevier publishing. Who is Monir El Azzouzi? Monir El Azzouzi is the founder and CEO of Easy Medical Device a Consulting firm that is supporting Medical Device manufacturers for any Quality and Regulatory affairs activities all over the world. Monir can help you to create your Quality Management System, Technical Documentation or he can also take care of your Clinical Evaluation, Clinical Investigation through his team or partners. Easy Medical Device can also become your Authorized Representative and Independent Importer Service provider for EU, UK and Switzerland. Monir has around 16 years of experience within the Medical Device industry working for small businesses and also big corporate companies. He has now supported around 100 clients to remain compliant on the market. His passion to the Medical Device filed pushed him to create educative contents like, blog, podcast, YouTube videos, LinkedIn Lives where he invites guests who are sharing educative information to his audience. Visit easymedicaldevice.com to know more. Link Linkedin Page: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bijanelahi/ Medtech Safety website: https://www.medtechsafety.com/ Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices Book: https://www.amazon.com/Safety-Risk-Management-Medical-Devices-ebook/dp/B09M3QXNL9/ref Conference website: https://medsafetyconf.net/home.php Conference registration page (early bird discounts end on 28 February): https://medsafetyconf.net/registreren.php Bijan's email: bijan@medtechsafety.com Social Media to follow Monir El Azzouzi Linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/melazzouzi Twitter: https://twitter.com/elazzouzim Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/easymedicaldevice Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/easymedicaldevice
In today's episode, I'm joined by Marco Fattori, CTO and co-founder of MicroAlign, to explore a groundbreaking innovation in fiber optics that could reshape quantum computing, data centers, AI, and space communication. The foundation of MicroAlign's technology was laid during Marco's Ph.D. research at Eindhoven University of Technology, where he tackled one of the biggest challenges in photonics—achieving ultra-efficient fiber-to-chip connectivity. With quantum computing advancing rapidly, every photon counts. Traditional fiber alignment methods struggle with precision, but MicroAlign's micro-actuator technology achieves 100-nanometer accuracy, vastly improving photon transmission efficiency. This advancement is critical for quantum computers, where precise photon management directly impacts computational power and scalability. But the implications go far beyond quantum computing. We discuss how this technology can revolutionize data centers by supporting co-packaged optics, improve AI processing efficiency, and enable high-speed, low-loss communication in space applications. Marco also shares the challenges of scaling production to meet industry demands and what the future holds for fiber connectivity in photonics. Could this innovation set a new standard for fiber optic connections across multiple industries? And what are the next big breakthroughs we can expect in photonic computing? Join us as we explore the cutting-edge world of photonics and its transformative potential. As always, I'd love to hear your thoughts—do you think fiber optic precision will be a game-changer for quantum computing and AI?
Listen to this interview of Sterre van Breukelen, engineer, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands; and Ann Barcomb, Assistant Professor, University of Calgary, Canada; and Sebastian Baltes, Full Professor, University of Bayreuth, Germany; and Alexander Serebrenik, Full Professor, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands. We talk about their coauthored paper "STILL AROUND": Experiences and Survival Strategies of Veteran Women Software Developers (ICSE 2023). Alexander Serebrenik : "It's a typical criticism of any human-factors study in software engineering, namely: What makes software engineers any different than any other human being — could a study have been conducted, say, with nurses or judges or whichever other professional category you can imagine. Therefore, in this paper "STILL AROUND" it was crucial for us to present clearly in the Introduction what it is that makes software engineers somehow special with respect to gender and age. Because otherwise, we would have struggled to convince researchers to devote any attention to the topic." Link to paper that Alexander and Sebastian refer to as one of the seeds for this paper, "STILL AROUND" Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Listen to this interview of Sterre van Breukelen, engineer, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands; and Ann Barcomb, Assistant Professor, University of Calgary, Canada; and Sebastian Baltes, Full Professor, University of Bayreuth, Germany; and Alexander Serebrenik, Full Professor, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands. We talk about their coauthored paper "STILL AROUND": Experiences and Survival Strategies of Veteran Women Software Developers (ICSE 2023). Alexander Serebrenik : "It's a typical criticism of any human-factors study in software engineering, namely: What makes software engineers any different than any other human being — could a study have been conducted, say, with nurses or judges or whichever other professional category you can imagine. Therefore, in this paper "STILL AROUND" it was crucial for us to present clearly in the Introduction what it is that makes software engineers somehow special with respect to gender and age. Because otherwise, we would have struggled to convince researchers to devote any attention to the topic." Link to paper that Alexander and Sebastian refer to as one of the seeds for this paper, "STILL AROUND" Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Sardinië, Okinawa, Ikaria, Loma Linda en Nicoya: deze ‘blue zones' zijn plekken waar mensen veel vaker 100 jaar of ouder worden, en dat in goede gezondheid. Wat maakt deze gebieden zo bijzonder? In deze serie maak je kennis met wetenschappers die op zoek zijn naar de formule voor een gezond leven. In de laatste aflevering vertelt Masi Mohamaddi (Eindhoven University of Technology) hoe onze huizen en wijken onze gezondheid bepalen—en hoe ze die inzichten gebruikt om slimme woningen te ontwerpen waar ouderen gezond en gelukkig de 100 halen.Deze serie is gemaakt door de Universiteit van Nederland met ondersteuning van het Institute for Preventive Health, een alliantie tussen Eindhoven University of Technology, Wageningen University & Research, Universiteit Utrecht en Universitair Medisch Centrum UtrechtZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
1 op de 7 jongeren wordt 100 jaar of ouder. Hoe kan de wetenschap hen helpen zo fit mogelijk oud te worden? In deze serie maak je kennis met onderzoekers die op zoek zijn naar de formule voor een gezond leven. Kirsten Verkooijen (Wageningen University & Research) richt zich op jongeren die die steun het hardst nodig hebben. Met slimme technologieën helpt ze hen gezondere keuzes te maken en een stevige basis te leggen voor een lang en vitaal leven.Deze serie is gemaakt door de Universiteit van Nederland met ondersteuning van het Institute for Preventive Health, een alliantie tussen Eindhoven University of Technology, Wageningen University & Research, Universiteit Utrecht en Universitair Medisch Centrum UtrechtZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In Nederland heeft 60% van de mensen een chronische aandoening, en 1 op de 2 Nederlanders krijgt ooit in zijn of haar leven te maken met kanker. Kan de wetenschap ons helpen dat aantal te verminderen? In deze serie maak je kennis met wetenschappers die op zoek zijn naar de formule voor een gezond leven. In deze aflevering vertelt Ellen Kampman (Wageningen University & Research) hoe voeding invloed heeft op je gezondheid, vooral bij kanker. De juiste voeding kan niet alleen de kans op kanker verminderen, maar het kan je ook ondersteunen als je al ziek bent.Deze serie is gemaakt door de Universiteit van Nederland met ondersteuning van het Institute for Preventive Health, een alliantie tussen Eindhoven University of Technology, Wageningen University & Research, Universiteit Utrecht en Universitair Medisch Centrum UtrechtZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In 2040 zijn er vier keer zoveel 100-jarigen in Nederland dan nu. Hoe blijven we fit en zelfstandig? In deze serie maak je kennis met wetenschappers die op zoek zijn naar de formule voor een gezond leven. In deze eerste aflevering Roel Vermeulen (Universiteit Utrecht): Hij onderzoekt hoe de wetenschap ons kan helpen gezonde keuzes te maken en ontwikkelt digitale steden die voorspellen of dat echt werkt.Deze serie is gemaakt door de Universiteit van Nederland met ondersteuning van het Institute for Preventive Health, een alliantie tussen Eindhoven University of Technology, Wageningen University & Research, Universiteit Utrecht en Universitair Medisch Centrum UtrechtZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
At Dutch Design Week, Eindhoven University of Technology shows its Drivers of Change. Maarten Steinbuch sees highly relevant technology. Yet a design event like DDW is in particular an opportunity to create societal awareness and also to boost the Societal Readiness Level of an idea. Innovation is not only about bringing up the Technology Readiness. Great ideas at TU/e that address the big challenges. We saw a brand new car design, designed with sustainability in mind, that impressed even Maarten Steinbuch. Also at DDW, the Eindhoven Engine host workshops to help illiterate people to cope with gaining access to information. Jean-Paul Linnartz took the opportunity to chat with Maarten right at the TU/e stand at Ketelhuisplein on Strijp S for Radio 4 Brainport.
Rob Bastiaans is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e). In this capacity, he is also Chairman of the Dutch Section of the Combustion Institute and Chairman of the workgroup on Fuel Flexibility and Emissions of ETN (European Turbine Network). His teaching at TU/e revolves around mechanical Engineering, modelling combustion and sustainable energy sources. Rob's areas of expertise include fluid mechanics, modeling and simulation, computational fluid dynamics, numerical simulation, numerical modeling, numerical analysis and CFD simulation. Current research includes the performance of flamelet generated manifolds (FGM) in premixed turbulent cases, measuring burning velocities with the heat flux method and FGM and pre-assumed PDF's In LES of combustion. Upcoming projects will look at complicated diffusion and combustion design. ONLINE PRESENCE ================
Listen to this interview of Jacob Krüger, Assistant Professor for Software Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. We talk about peer review in software engineering — what it is, and what it might be. Jacob Krüger : "When you submit to broad-themed conferences like ICSE or FSE, you cannot assume much background knowledge on individual tools or techniques which are really, let's say, the standard in your home community. Because, to succeed as such conferences as those, your really need to communicate explicitly to your reviewers what you have done, which steps you have taken, the techniques you have used and for which reasons — so, basically, you have to explain each design decision of your study. Of course, at a small domain conference, many of these things will be obvious — but not to all reviewers at a large conference, because, remember, these are the conferences where many communities gather — here your reviewers are likely to be very diverse in their research. So, it is the authors' job to explain and justify every move in the study.” Link to the paper where Jacob talks about the process of review Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Listen to this interview of Jacob Krüger, Assistant Professor for Software Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. We talk about peer review in software engineering — what it is, and what it might be. Jacob Krüger : "When you submit to broad-themed conferences like ICSE or FSE, you cannot assume much background knowledge on individual tools or techniques which are really, let's say, the standard in your home community. Because, to succeed as such conferences as those, your really need to communicate explicitly to your reviewers what you have done, which steps you have taken, the techniques you have used and for which reasons — so, basically, you have to explain each design decision of your study. Of course, at a small domain conference, many of these things will be obvious — but not to all reviewers at a large conference, because, remember, these are the conferences where many communities gather — here your reviewers are likely to be very diverse in their research. So, it is the authors' job to explain and justify every move in the study.” Link to the paper where Jacob talks about the process of review Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Listen to this interview of Clemens Dubslaff, Assistant Professor, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. We talk about the cultural dividing lines between researcher communities, and of course, how to cross those lines into whole new areas of research. Clemens Dubslaff : "One particular thing I would like to see eXplainable Formal Methods (XFM) do is to revisit the many papers from the early 1990s and so on — papers from logic and programming, where we have many things ready already. I mean, these papers have, in many cases, already discussed explanation, even from the standpoint of philosophy. So, these are just really good papers, but unfortunately more on the forgotten side. That's why I think that connecting that knowledge from the past — say, about causality, for instance — to this new field of XFM will certainly help and advance the research." Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Listen to this interview of Clemens Dubslaff, Assistant Professor, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. We talk about the cultural dividing lines between researcher communities, and of course, how to cross those lines into whole new areas of research. Clemens Dubslaff : "One particular thing I would like to see eXplainable Formal Methods (XFM) do is to revisit the many papers from the early 1990s and so on — papers from logic and programming, where we have many things ready already. I mean, these papers have, in many cases, already discussed explanation, even from the standpoint of philosophy. So, these are just really good papers, but unfortunately more on the forgotten side. That's why I think that connecting that knowledge from the past — say, about causality, for instance — to this new field of XFM will certainly help and advance the research." Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Markham interviews Auke Hoekstra, energy transition researcher at the Eindhoven University of Technology, where he founded the NEON research program.
The term ‘burnout' has become a common one in recent times. But are we clear on what it really means and, even more importantly, exactly what causes it? The World Health Organization recently recognised it as an ‘occupational phenomenon'. So what should organisations be doing to prevent burnout or, at the very least, to address it when it does occur amongst their employees? Discussion with Evangelia Demerouti, Professor of Work and Organizational Psychology at the Eindhoven University of Technology and co-author (with Niels Adaloudis) of the recent ETUI report ‘Addressing burnout in organisations'. Further reading Addressing burnout in organisations | etui The fractions and burden of cardiovascular diseases and depression attributable to psychosocial work exposures in the European Union | etui Psychosocial risks: a mounting crisis | etui Psychosocial risks in the healthcare and long-term care sectors | etui
It is introweek. Eindhoven University of Technology welcomes 2300 new students. Hundreds of them are international students. Former board member Eduardo Costa Martins explains the activities of COSMOS.
In this episode, we delve into the evolving landscape of workplace dynamics with host Matthew Tucker, IFMA's Director of Research alongside Dr. Elisabeth Nelson, a researcher and author, Sophie Schuller, Built Environment Researcher and PhD Student at the Eindhoven University of Technology, and Chiara Tagliaro, Full-time Researcher and Consultant at Politecnico di Milano. Together they discuss the impacts of hybrid work, the importance of diversity, and the varying individual needs that shape our professional environments today. They also highlight how unique work styles can enhance productivity, the necessity of inclusive design for gender diversity and neurodivergence, and the benefits of choice and flexibility in boosting well-being and performance. Resources Mentioned:Factors Impacting Retention And Advancement Of Women In Facility Management Report Connect with Us:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ifmaFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/InternationalFacilityManagementAssociation/Twitter: https://twitter.com/IFMAInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/ifma_hq/YouTube: https://youtube.com/ifmaglobalVisit us at https://ifma.org
Read the full transcript here. How much should we trust social science papers in top journals? How do we know a paper is trustworthy? Do large datasets mitigate p-hacking? Why doesn't psychology as a field seem to be working towards a grand unified theory? Why aren't more psychological theories written in math? Or are other scientific fields mathematicized to a fault? How do we make psychology cumulative? How can we create environments, especially in academia, that incentivize constructive criticism? Why isn't peer review pulling its weight in terms of catching errors and constructively criticizing papers? What kinds of problems simply can't be caught by peer review? Why is peer review saved for the very end of the publication process? What is "importance hacking"? On what bits of psychological knowledge is there consensus among researchers? When and why do adversarial collaborations fail? Is admission of error a skill that can be taught and learned? How can students be taught that p-hacking is problematic without causing them to over-correct into a failure to explore their problem space thoroughly and efficiently?Daniel Lakens is an experimental psychologist working at the Human-Technology Interaction group at Eindhoven University of Technology. In addition to his empirical work in cognitive and social psychology, he works actively on improving research methods and statistical inferences, and has published on the importance of replication research, sequential analyses and equivalence testing, and frequentist statistics. Follow him on Twitter / X at @Lakens.Further reading:Nullius in Verba (Daniel's podcast) StaffSpencer Greenberg — Host / DirectorJosh Castle — ProducerRyan Kessler — Audio EngineerUri Bram — FactotumWeAmplify — TranscriptionistsMusicBroke for FreeJosh WoodwardLee RosevereQuiet Music for Tiny Robotswowamusiczapsplat.comAffiliatesClearer ThinkingGuidedTrackMind EasePositlyUpLift[Read more]
Femke van Beek works as a postdoc with Irene Kuling, in the Dynamics and Control Group of the Department of Mechnical Engineering at Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e). Her current project is part of the 4TU Soft Robots Program, in which soft robots are developed by taking inspiration from nature, like octopus arms and elephant trunks. She uses these soft robots for creating haptic feedback, i.e. touch feedback, in Virtual Reality and tele-operation applications. By using these novel soft haptic feedback displays, she investigates which haptic stimuli are vital to unlock more intuitive interactions with simulated systems. Femke holds an MSc in sensory biology and biomechanics from Wageningen University, after which she changed her focus from animals to humans in her PhD. In her project, she worked on haptic perception for tele-operation applications, under the supervision of Astrid Kappers and Wouter Bergmann Tiest at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Next, she moved to Seattle for a postdoc at Oculus Research/Facebook Reality Labs, where she worked on using haptics together with visuals and sound to create tangible, interactable objects in Virtual and Augmented Reality. After 5 years of research in this industry setting, she returned to the Netherlands and to academia at the TU/e. For more information about Femke, visit the TU/E official website.
Should we be scared about a future generation of engineers who know more about how to use AI than about their technical field? Do we need to know about the details of processing inside micro-electronic IC's to help create better smart phone, or to design an autonomous car? Haven't we continuously raised the level of abstraction at which we look into systems? Radio 4 Brainport hosts Jean-Paul Linnartz and Parag Gupta debate the role of novel technology in education with Prof. Oded Raz of Eindhoven University of Technology. Initially we invited this award-winning TU/e teacher Oded Raz for his view on the use of artificial intelligence in education. Oded is not only a columnist for the Eindhoven University of Technology opinion magazine Cursus, he also is thought leader on education in his own series of podcasts and a vocal member of electrical engineering teaching staff. He has a right to speak up: student highly appreciate his style and his approach to educating. Yet, instead of diving straight into the role of AI in education, for better or for worse, Oded reveals that he is sceptical about modern aids such as powerpoint. He recently rediscovered how students learn more if a teacher develops the thoughts, the math, the ideas step by step, live on the board. So, in this podcast we start off by looking in more detail into how our brain absorbs knowledge. An essential part of mastering a topic is to be able to actively use the theory, and apply it both in routine and in novel ways. Making homework assignments really serves a purpose. Letting AI do homework for you, may come with unpleasant surprises during the exam. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/podcasts-4-brainport/message
“He is very innovative”, “This professor writes on the black board!”. Initially radio hosts Parag Gupta and Jean-Paul Linnartz invited award-winning TU/e teacher Oded Raz for his view on the use of artificial intelligence in education. Oded is not only a columnist for the Eindhoven University of Technology opinion magazine Cursus, he also is thought leader on education in his own series of podcasts and a vocal member of electrical engineering teaching staff. He has a right to speak up: student highly appreciate his style and his approach to educating. Yet, instead of diving straight into the role of AI in education, for better or for worse, Oded reveals that he is skeptical about modern aids such as powerpoint. He recently rediscovered how students learn more if a teacher develops the thoughts, the math, the ideas step by step, live on the board. So, in this podcast we start off by looking in more detail into how our brain absorbs knowledge. An essential part of mastering a topic is to be able to actively use the theory, and apply it both in routine and in novel ways. Making homework assignments really serves a purpose. Letting AI do homework for you, may come with unpleasant surprises during the exam. But, should we be scared about a future generation of engineers who know more about how to use AI than about their technical field? Do we need to know about the details of processing inside micro-electronic IC's to help create better smart phone, or to design an autonomous car? Haven't we continuously raised the level of abstraction at which we look into systems? Join the debate on Radio 4 Brainport, Eindhoven --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/podcasts-4-brainport/message
Daniel J Bernstein (djb) was born in 1971. He is a USA/German citizen and a Personal Professor at Eindhoven University of Technology and a Research Professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. At the tender age of 24 — in 1995 — he, along with the Electronic Frontier Foundation — brought a case against the US Government related to the protection of free speech (Bernstein v. United States: here). It resulted in a ruling that software should be included in the First Amendment. A core contribution is that it has reduced government regulations around cryptography. It was a sign of the greatness that was to come from the amazing mind of Daniel. His viewpoint on reducing the strength of cryptography at the time defined: “There are, fortunately, not many terrorists in the world. But there are many criminals exploiting Internet vulnerabilities for economic gain. They infiltrate computers and steal whatever secrets they can find, from individual credit-card numbers to corporate business plans. There are also quite a few vandals causing trouble just for fun.” Since then few others have done so much for the cause of privacy, including creating the Sala20 [link] stream cipher in 2005, and then with ChaCha20 [link] and Poly1305 in 2008. Many connections in TLS now use ChaCha20, rather than AES, as it is faster — over three times after than AES — and has a lower computing requirement. His love of using dance names also comes to the fore with Rumba [here]. It is not just in symmetric key encryption that he has contributed to, he has made significant contributions to public key encryption. In 2005, he defined the Curve 25519 elliptic curve, and which is now a fairly standard way of defining elliptic curves. For signatures, he then defined Ed25519, and the resultant version of a new EdDSA signature (and which is now included in OpenSSH). The Tor protocol, for example, uses Curve 25519 for its key exchange for each of the nodes involved in a secure route. He defined the SPHINCS+ method for PQC digital signatures. This is one of the NIST approved methods for quantum robust signatures. In 2015, Daniel defined the methods that the NSA may have used to compromise the NIST defined elliptic curves [paper]. And 2005, it was Daniel again who introduced a new type of attack [here]. Daniel run his Web site from https://cr.yp.to More details: https://medium.com/asecuritysite-when-bob-met-alice/a-lifetime-dedicated-to-citizens-rights-to-privacy-daniel-j-bernstein-ab5ab2bf0dc6
Autonomous Vehicles are increasingly benefiting from artificial intelligence (AI) for AI-driven perception, situational awareness, and decision-making components.Nevertheless, AI may demonstrate unfairness, bias, and sensitivity to unexpected inputs. Developing transparent and reliable AI stands as the next imperative in technology evolution, encompassing crucial attributes like robustness, privacy, explainability, accountability, and ethics.Join us for a stimulating discussion on autonomous mobility and AI where we discuss building trust beyond the hype. We'll delve into the heart of the technological revolution reshaping transportation as we explore the intersection of autonomous mobility and artificial intelligence.Guests Include:Margriet van Schijndel – de Nooij, Eindhoven University of TechnologyBernhard Lambernd, PwC
In episode 21 of Recsperts, we welcome Martijn Willemsen, Associate Professor at the Jheronimus Academy of Data Science and Eindhoven University of Technology. Martijn's researches on interactive recommender systems which includes aspects of decision psychology and user-centric evaluation. We discuss how users gain control over recommendations, how to support their goals and needs as well as how the user-centric evaluation framework fits into all of this.In our interview, Martijn outlines the reasons for providing users control over recommendations and how to holistically evaluate the satisfaction and usefulness of recommendations for users goals and needs. We discuss the psychology of decision making with respect to how well or not recommender systems support it. We also dive into music recommender systems and discuss how nudging users to explore new genres can work as well as how longitudinal studies in recommender systems research can advance insights. Towards the end of the episode, Martijn and I also discuss some examples and the usefulness of enabling users to provide negative explicit feedback to the system.Enjoy this enriching episode of RECSPERTS - Recommender Systems Experts.Don't forget to follow the podcast and please leave a review(00:00) - Introduction (03:03) - About Martijn Willemsen (15:14) - Waves of User-Centric Evaluation in RecSys (19:35) - Behaviorism is not Enough (46:21) - User-Centric Evaluation Framework (01:05:38) - Genre Exploration and Longitudinal Studies in Music RecSys (01:20:59) - User Control and Negative Explicit Feedback (01:31:50) - Closing Remarks Links from the Episode:Martijn Willemsen on LinkedInMartijn Willemsen's WebsiteUser-centric Evaluation FrameworkBehaviorism is not Enough (Talk at RecSys 2016)Neil Hunt: Quantifying the Value of Better Recommendations (Keynote at RecSys 2014)What recommender systems can learn from decision psychology about preference elicitation and behavioral change (Talk at Boise State (Idaho) and Grouplens at University of Minnesota)Eric J. Johnson: The Elements of ChoiceRasch ModelSpotify Web APIPapers:Ekstrand et al. (2016): Behaviorism is not Enough: Better Recommendations Through Listening to UsersKnijenburg et al. (2012): Explaining the user experience of recommender systemsEkstrand et al. (2014): User perception of differences in recommender algorithmsLiang et al. (2022): Exploring the longitudinal effects of nudging on users' music genre exploration behavior and listening preferencesMcNee et al. (2006): Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systemsGeneral Links:Follow me on LinkedInFollow me on XSend me your comments, questions and suggestions to marcel.kurovski@gmail.comRecsperts Website
This episode of the Flow Radio podcast features Dr. Jef J. J. Van den Hout, associate researcher at the Eindhoven University of Technology and the Erasmus University Rotterdam, the founder of Flow Concepts, and one of the world's foremost experts on flow in teams. Dr. van den Hout joins Flow Research Collective Chief of Staff Ryan Wickes and Chief Science officer Dr. Michael Mannino to talk about how leaders and teams can spark flow and optimize collaboration in the workplace. In This Episode: 0:00 Introduction 01:28 Team Flow vs. Individual Flow 04:19 The Importance of Mutual Accountability 10:12 The Role of Context in Team Flow 15:36 The Default Mode Network in Team Flow 19:39 Facilitating Team Flow Conversations 22:27 Barriers to Team Flow 27:58 The Impact of Team Flow on Individual Happiness 35:05 Constructive Criticism and Team Flow 42:07 The Flow Cycle in Individual and Team Flow 43:52 The Future of Team Flow Research About The Guest: Dr. Jef van den Hout, PDEng, has earned his Ph.D. with a focus on understanding and measuring team flow. He applies this knowledge to enhance team performance in professional settings. As the creator of Flow Concepts, Jef leads efforts to simplify complex team interactions and foster exceptional outcomes. He's an associate researcher with the Eindhoven University of Technology and the Erasmus University Rotterdam. His research spans several key areas: flow, team flow, optimal collaboration, sustainable performance, and challenge-based learning environments such as innovation ecosystems and professional learning communities. Jef is driven by a clear mission: to connect scientific research with real-world practice. He shares, “I find it fascinating to unravel climates for optimal collaboration and moments of team flow. Especially, if the ambitions could lead to something just beautiful, something unusually good, or something completely innovative! ” Episode Resources: Website: https://flowconcepts.nl/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jefvandenhout/ X: https://twitter.com/jefvandenhout Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jef.vandenhout Flow Radio Is Presented By Flow Research Collective Are you an entrepreneur, a leader, or a knowledge worker, who wants to harness the power of flow so you can get more done in less time with greater ease and accomplish your boldest professional goals faster? If the answer is yes, then our peak-performance training Zero To Dangerous may be a good fit for you. Flow Research Collective is a leading neuroscience research and training company. If you're interested in learning the science-backed techniques we used to train top executives at Facebook, Audi and even the Navy SEALs, click the link here: https://www.flowresearchcollective.com/zero-to-dangerous/overview Follow Flow Research Collective: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@flowresearchcollective Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/flowresearchcollective LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/flowresearchcollective X: https://twitter.com/thefrc_official Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/flowresearchcollective Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6RQY0d5rdlEiinHEtfWy6A Website: https://www.flowresearchcollective.com Flow Research Collective was founded by Steven Kotler, one of the world's leading experts on human peak performance. He is an award-winning journalist and author with over ten bestselling books.
In 2013, Dr. Mark Post shocked the world when he debuted the world's first-ever burger grown from animal cells. Weighing in as a quarter-pounder, the burger carried a price tag of a mere $330,000—all of which was funded by Google co-founder Sergey Brin. A decade later, what does Mark think about the movement and the industry he helped birth? When his burger was debuted, a grand total of zero companies existed to commercialize what would come to be called cultivated meat, no serious investment dollars had flowed into cultivated meat research, yet hopes were high that such meat would be on the market within a decade. In this episode, Mark offers why he thinks his timeline predictions in 2013 were proven too optimistic, what he thinks the biggest hurdles to success were and are, and what inventions still must be made to give cultivated meat a shot at making a dent in the number of animals used for food. Discussed in this episode Mark recommends reading the journal Nature Food. Paul's book Clean Meat tells Mark's tale, and is coming out as an updated paperback edition on April 9, 2024! More about Mark Post Dr. Mark Post, MD/PhD, has had several appointments as assistant professor at Utrecht University, Harvard University, as associate professor at Dartmouth college, and as full professor at Eindhoven University of Technology and Maastricht University. He currently holds the chair of the Physiology Department at Maastricht University. He is visiting professor at Harvard, University of Modena and faculty at Singularity University. His main research interest is the engineering of tissues for medical applications and for food. The medical applications focus on the construction of blood vessels that can be used as grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting. Tissue engineering for Food has lead to the development of cultured beef from bovine skeletal muscle stem cells in an effort to transform the traditional meat production through livestock. Dr Post co-authored 165 papers in leading peer-reviewed scientific journals and received during his career over 50 million dollars in funding and awards from different sources including government, charity and industry. He presented the world's first hamburger from cultured beef in the August 2013 and is working on improvements and scaling up the production of cultured meat. He received the World Technology Award from AAAS/Times/Forbes for invention with the biggest potential for environmental impact. Dr Post is CSO and co-founder of MosaMeat and of Qorium, two companies that aim to commercialize meat and leather applications of tissue engineering. He is CEO of Cell2Tissue, which is a developer of technologies in tissue engineering for consumer and health applications.
------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao ------------------Follow me on--------------------- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDissenterYT This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Vlasta Sikimić is an Assistant Professor at the Eindhoven University of Technology. Her research focus is on Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of AI, Empirical Philosophy, Logic, Science Policy, and Animal Ethics. More specifically, she works on data-driven approaches to optimization of scientific reasoning. In this episode, we talk about the epistemology of science. We first get into epistemic attitudes, epistemic tolerance and authoritarianism, skepticism towards the scientific method, whether epistemic attitudes relate to politics, and whether the political views of scientists play a major role in their scientific decisions. We talk about scientific performance, epistemic efficiency, machine learning in grant reviews, and research funding. We discuss team structures, and optimal research team composition in science. We talk about the decision to stop investing in particular scientific projects. We discuss methods to study the social epistemology of science. Finally, we talk about the costs associated with trying to reduce all scientific production and communication to English, epistemic equity, and dissatisfaction of female and early-career researchers with the academic system. -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, OLAF ALEX, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ANTON ERIKSSON, CHARLES MOREY, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, BENJAMIN GELBART, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, NIKLAS CARLSSON, ISMAËL BENSLIMANE, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, PER KRAULIS, KATE VON GOELER, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, LIAM DUNAWAY, BR, MASOUD ALIMOHAMMADI, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, ERIK ENGMAN, AND LUCY! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, AL NICK ORTIZ, AND NICK GOLDEN! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, BOGDAN KANIVETS, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!
Watch behind the scenes with Bert on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/posts/bert-de-vries-93230722 https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk Note, there is some mild background music on chapter 1 (Least Action), 3 (Friston) and 5 (Variational Methods) - please skip ahead if annoying. It's a tiny fraction of the overall podcast. YT version: https://youtu.be/2wnJ6E6rQsU Bert de Vries is Professor in the Signal Processing Systems group at Eindhoven University. His research focuses on the development of intelligent autonomous agents that learn from in-situ interactions with their environment. His research draws inspiration from diverse fields including computational neuroscience, Bayesian machine learning, Active Inference and signal processing. Bert believes that development of signal processing systems will in the future be largely automated by autonomously operating agents that learn purposeful from situated environmental interactions. Bert received nis M.Sc. (1986) and Ph.D. (1991) degrees in Electrical Engineering from Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) and the University of Florida, respectively. From 1992 to 1999, he worked as a research scientist at Sarnoff Research Center in Princeton (NJ, USA). Since 1999, he has been employed in the hearing aids industry, both in engineering and managerial positions. De Vries was appointed part-time professor in the Signal Processing Systems Group at TU/e in 2012. Contact: https://twitter.com/bertdv0 https://www.tue.nl/en/research/researchers/bert-de-vries https://www.verses.ai/about-us Panel: Dr. Tim Scarfe / Dr. Keith Duggar TOC: [00:00:00] Principle of Least Action [00:05:10] Patreon Teaser [00:05:46] On Friston [00:07:34] Capm Peterson (VERSES) [00:08:20] Variational Methods [00:16:13] Dan Mapes (VERSES) [00:17:12] Engineering with Active Inference [00:20:23] Jason Fox (VERSES) [00:20:51] Riddhi Jain Pitliya [00:21:49] Hearing Aids as Adaptive Agents [00:33:38] Steven Swanson (VERSES) [00:35:46] Main Interview Kick Off, Engineering and Active Inference [00:43:35] Actor / Streaming / Message Passing [00:56:21] Do Agents Lose Flexibility with Maturity? [01:00:50] Language Compression [01:04:37] Marginalisation to Abstraction [01:12:45] Online Structural Learning [01:18:40] Efficiency in Active Inference [01:26:25] SEs become Neuroscientists [01:35:11] Building an Automated Engineer [01:38:58] Robustness and Design vs Grow [01:42:38] RXInfer [01:51:12] Resistance to Active Inference? [01:57:39] Diffusion of Responsibility in a System [02:10:33] Chauvinism in "Understanding" [02:20:08] On Becoming a Bayesian Refs: RXInfer https://biaslab.github.io/rxinfer-website/ Prof. Ariel Caticha https://www.albany.edu/physics/faculty/ariel-caticha Pattern recognition and machine learning (Bishop) https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2006/01/Bishop-Pattern-Recognition-and-Machine-Learning-2006.pdf Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial (Sivia) https://www.amazon.co.uk/Data-Analysis-Bayesian-Devinderjit-Sivia/dp/0198568320 Probability Theory: The Logic of Science (E. T. Jaynes) https://www.amazon.co.uk/Probability-Theory-Principles-Elementary-Applications/dp/0521592712/ #activeinference #artificialintelligence
Explore the fascinating world of Active Inference AI and the Free Energy Principle developed by Dr. Karl Friston in this episode of the Spatial Web AI Podcast, as host, Denise Holt, welcomes Dr. Bert De Vries, Professor at Eindhoven University of Technology. #ActiveInference Discover how the Active Inference approach to AI follows the principle of least action and describes how information processing occurs in biological systems like the brain. The brain builds a model of the world to predict sensory inputs and uses Bayesian inference to update its beliefs. Dr. De Vries highlights that this approach creates adaptable and efficient AI systems, with applications ranging from healthcare to robotics. Learn about how this form of AI works in the brain for efficient information processing, applications in robotics, engineering and medicine, advantages over deep learning models, and why active inference is poised to be the next big wave of AI. Chapters: 0:00 - Introduction 1:55 – Understanding First Principles AI 8:31 – The Impact of First Principles on Personal Experiences 18:17- Active Inference and its Applications 25:13 - Advantages over deep learning 26:31 – Building a Toolbox for Active Inference 34:36 - Energy efficiency of Active Inference and the Free Energy Principle 44:33 – Distributed Intelligent Agents 48:41 - Why active inference is next wave of AI 53:33 - Advice for students 58:02 - Wrap-up Special thank you to Dr. Bert De Vries for being on our show! Connect with him: Website: http://biaslab.org RXinfer Toolbox: http://rxinfer.ml Company: http://lazydynamics.com You can also learn more on my blog: https://deniseholt.us Explore the future of AI with Active Inference and gain insights into this revolutionary approach! Subscribe to our channel for more ground breaking content. #ActiveInferenceAI #FirstPrinciplesAI #FreeEnergyPrinciple #FutureofAI #KarlFriston #VERSES
In this special episode of Mining your business podcast, we take you inside the action-packed International Conference on Process Mining in Rome. We've gathered an array of experts and enthusiasts from academia, consulting and businesses, all under one roof, to explore the transformative power of process mining and real-world applications.Join us for a snapshot of the conference's energy and insights, and discover how process mining is reshaping the business world.The list of special guests features:Maximilian Röglinger, University of Bayreuth | FIM Research Center | Fraunhofer FITMarlon Dumas, Apromore | University of TartuJean-Marc Erieau, MANN+HUMMELRafael Accorsi, AccentureDirk Fahland, Eindhoven University of TechnologyElham Ramezani, KPMGMichal Rosik, MicrosoftEnjoy!Follow us on our LinkedIn page here: LinkedInLearn more about what we do at Processand here: Processand
Queremos saber sua opinião sobre o Face Oculta: https://sitebp.la/opiniao-face-oculta ___________ Por trás de aclamadas personalidades há um lado obscuro que ninguém está olhando. Neste programa documental e cheio de mistérios, abordaremos a face oculta das principais personalidades e instituições. Nesta edição: Michel Foucault __________ Fontes: Campbell, M. French philosopher Foucault 'abused boys in Tunisia'. The Sunday Times, 28/03/2021 Eribon, D. Michel Foucault. 1991 Foucault, M. Politics, Philosophy, Culture. 1988. Macey, D. The Lives of Michel Foucault. 1993 Miller, J. The passion of Michel Foucault. 1993 Seymour-Jones, C. Uma relação perigosa. 2014 Debate Chomsky–Foucault. Eindhoven University of Technology, Holanda, 1971. Entrevista Guy Sorman. Ce soir, France 5, 2021. Entrevista Michel Foucault. Université catholique de Louvain, Bélgica, 1981. Jordan Peterson: The Book of Revelation, Ronaldo and the role of the artist. SpectatorTV, 2022. __________ Precisa de ajuda para assinar? Fale com nossa equipe comercial: https://sitebp.la/yt-equipe-de-vendas Já é assinante e gostaria de fazer o upgrade? Aperte aqui: https://sitebp.la/yt-equipe-upgrade __________ Siga a #BrasilParalelo: Site: https://bit.ly/portal-bp Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/brasilparalelo Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/brasilparalelo Twitter: https://twitter.com/brasilparalelo Produtos oficiais: https://loja.brasilparalelo.com.br/ ___________ Sobre a Brasil Paralelo: Somos uma empresa de entretenimento e educação fundada em 2016. Produzimos documentários, filmes, séries, trilogias, cursos, podcasts e muito mais. Nosso foco é o conteúdo informativo e educativo relacionado ao contexto social, político e econômico brasileiro.
Eindhoven University of Technology's 90mph, two-seater car completes gruelling 620-mile test drive across Morocco and Sahara desert - without a single recharging stop. Sir David Attenborough warns against taking majesty of the natural world for granted. Minecraft's first video game to sell 300 million copies. X begins user charging in social media trial.Also in this episode:Solar system's first space spa: six hours for £100K'Million-plus satellites' soon to orbit EarthConcerns ancient frozen viruses are ‘thawing in climate change'Why 14-year-old UK cat has loudest purr Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
On this episode I was joined by Bijan Elahi, Award winning Medical Device Risk Management author, educator and consultant. Bijan walks through: MedTech vs. Aerospace - Differences in Risk Management Approaches Risk Control/Reduction - AFAP vs. ALARP or ALARA and Global Requirements Quantifying Benefit and Benefit/Risk Risk Control Measures What a good risk management process looks Bijan Elahi has worked in risk management for medical devices for over 29 years at the largest medical device companies in the world, as well as small startups. He is a Technical Fellow, and the Medtronic corporate Advisor on safety risk management of medical devices. In this capacity, he offers education and consulting on risk management to all Medtronic business units, worldwide. Bijan is a lecturer at Eindhoven University of Technology (Netherlands), where he teaches risk management to doctoral students in engineering. At the invitation of the FDA, he is also teaching a graduate course on medical device risk management at Drexel University (Philadelphia, USA).
Gilbert Laporte is Professor Emeritus at HEC Montréal. He obtained his Ph.D. in Operational Research at the London School of Economics in 1975. He was Professor of Operational Research at HEC Montréal and Canada Research Chair in Distribution Management until August 2020. He is now Professor at the School of Management of the University of Bath, United Kingdom, and Professor II at Molde University College, Norway. He is also Honorary Visiting Professor at the University of Liverpool, and Distinguished Professor at the Eindhoven University of Technology. He is a member of the Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT) and founding member of the Group for Research in Decision Analysis (GERAD). He has been Editor of Transportation Science, Computers & Operations Research and INFOR. He has authored or coauthored more than 20 books and 600 scientific articles in combinatorial optimization, mostly in the areas of vehicle routing, location, districting and timetabling. Gilbert Laporte has received many scientific awards including the Pergamon Prize (UK) in 1987, the 1994 Award of Merit from the Canadian OR Society (CORS), and the CORS Practice Prize on four occasions. In 1999, he obtained the Jacques-Rousseau Prize for Interdisciplinarity from the Association canadienne-française pour l'avancement des sciences (Acfas), and the President's Medal from the Operational Research Society (UK). In 2001, he was awarded the Grand Prize for Teaching Excellence by HEC Montréal. He has been a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada since 1998, and a Fellow of INFORMS since 2005. In 2005, he was the co-winner of the Glover-Klingman Prize. In 2007 he was awarded the Innis-Gérin Medal from the Royal Society of Canada. In 2009 he received the Gérard-Parizeau Award, he was inducted as the 42nd Honorary Member of the INFORMS International Omega Rho Society, and he received the Robert Herman Lifetime Achievement Award in Transportation Science from the Transportation Science and Logistics Section of INFORMS. In 2012, he won the Pierre-Laurin Award from HEC Montréal for his overall career research achievements. In 2014, he was the co-winner of the FICO Global “Optimize the Real World” contest and he received the Lifetime Achievement in Location Analysis Award from the INFORMS Section on Location Analysis. In 2016 the Eindhoven University of Technology awarded him a Doctorate honoris causa and he received the Acfas Urgel-Archambault Prize in physical sciences, mathematics, computer science or engineering. He obtained the FRQNT 2016-2017 Excellence Award. In 2018, he received a Doctorate honoris causa from the Université de Liège, as well as the Marie-Victorin prize awarded by the Quebec government to a researcher in engineering or natural sciences. He also became a member of the Order of Canada. In 2019, he was elected international member of the National Academy of Engineering (USA) and he became a fellow of the EURO Working Group on Vehicle Routing and Logistics Optimization. In 2020 he was named Member Emeritus of CORS. In 2021 he won the Killam Prize in Engineering and he received a Doctorate honoris causa from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. In 2022 he received the Euro Gold Medal from the Association of European Operational Research Societies, he was a co-winner one of the SEIO-BBVA Foundation prizes and of the Goodeve Medal awarded by the British OR Society.
Dr Heleen de Coninck is a Professor of Socio-Technical Innovation and Climate Change at Eindhoven University of Technology, and Associate Professor in Innovation Studies and Sustainability at Radboud University. She is also the newly appointed deputy chair of the Dutch Scientific Climate Council. In this episode, we discuss the four Net Zero transitions set out in the 2018 IPCC 1.5ºC report, and specifically how to facilitate a just transition. Towards the end, we debate on how much focus on geoengineering technologies is healthy. Links: Heleen's profile Lecture transcript: system change, not climate change IPCC Special Report on "Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage” IPCC Special Report on “Global Warming of 1.5 ºC” Support the showSubscribe for email updates
In this episode, Bijan Elahi will help us perform risk management for SaMD and give us some tips on the best strategies. Bijan is also the author of the book “Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices”. If you have to perform risk management for a software as a Medical Device or Medical Device software you may think how this can be done?, Are the tools, standards, the same as for normal medical devices? Are the risks different? Bijan Elahi will be my guest on this episode and will explain to us the best practices for SaMD risk management. Don't miss this and also his book called “Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices”. Link below. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ►Who is Bijan Elahi? Bijan Elahi has worked in safety risk management for medical devices for over 25 years at the largest medical device companies in the world, as well as small startups. He started his work in risk management in aerospace; last working on the Space Shuttle at NASA before transitioning to the medical device industry in the early 1990's. Bijan is the corporate expert on risk management at Medtronic. In this capacity, he offers education and consulting on risk management to all Medtronic business units worldwide. Bijan is also a lecturer at Delft University of Technology, and Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands, where he teaches risk management to doctoral students in engineering. Bijan is a frequently invited speaker at international professional conferences, and is also a contributor to ISO 14971, the international standard on the application of risk management to medical devices. He is the author of the book Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ►Who is Monir El Azzouzi? Monir El Azzouzi is the founder and CEO of Easy Medical Device a Consulting firm that is supporting Medical Device manufacturers for any Quality and Regulatory affairs activities all over the world. Monir can help you to create your Quality Management System, Technical Documentation or he can also take care of your Clinical Evaluation, Clinical Investigation through his team or partners. Easy Medical Device can also become your Authorized Representative and Independent Importer Service provider for EU, UK and Switzerland. Monir has around 16 years of experience within the Medical Device industry working for small businesses and also big corporate companies. He has now supported around 100 clients to remain compliant on the market. His passion to the Medical Device filed pushed him to create educative contents like, blog, podcast, youtube videos, linkedin Lives where he invites guests who are sharing educative information to his audience. Visit easymedicaldevice.com to know more. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link: - Bijan Elahi LinkedIn Profile:https://www.linkedin.com/in/bijanelahi/ - Book: “Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices” - Episode 207: Why Risk Management is important to Medical Device development: 0615d2e00575cae3959fb7212426da41 - Episode 216: How to evaluate Benefit-Risk ratio for Medical Devices?: 0615d2e00575cae3959fb7212426da41 - Authorized Representative and Importer services: https://easymedicaldevice.com/authorised-representative-and-importer/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ► Social Media to follow ■ Monir El Azzouzi Linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/melazzouzi ■ Twitter: https://twitter.com/elazzouzim ■ Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/easymedicaldevice ■ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/easymedicaldevice ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ #easymedicaldevice #medicaldevice #regulatorycompliance
Dr. Llewellyn van Zyl on how happiness differs from culture to culture, Positive Psychology in universities and organisations, the most effective Positive Psychology Interventions for you, work-life balance, following your passion and much more… Dr. van Zyl's Bio Dr. Llewellyn van Zyl is an Assistant Professor in Organisational Psychology at Eindhoven University of Technology. Dr. van Zyl has published prolifically in areas of organisational psychology and positive psychology. Dr. van Zyl is currently the Speciality Chief Editor (Ass) of Frontiers in Psychology (Positive Psychology) journal. Dr. van Zyl has also consulted with many organisations to improve employee performance and wellbeing outcomes. Chapters 00:00:00 Show Intro 00:01:50 What is happiness? 00:05:55 Cultural differences in happiness 00:13:10 Is happiness genetically determined? 00:16:20 Positive psychology as a discipline 00:33:20 How to critique self-help, pop psychology 00:46:15 Positive Psychology Interventions (PPIs) 00:52:25 Personalising PPIs 01:06:00 Flourishing for Uni Students 01:27:00 Positive Organisational Psychology 01:40:50 Real reason companies hire psychologists 01:46:10 Ethical challenges in organisational psychology 01:50:25 Work-life balance/integration 01:54:10 On ‘following your passion' 01:57:45 The 4 choices you always have Further resources mentioned in this episode “The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life” by Keyes (2002) “Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change” by Lyubomirsky et. al. (2005) “Positive psychology: An introduction” by Seligman (2000) “The Critiques and Criticisms of Positive Psychology: A Systematic Review” by van Zyl et. al. (2023) “The Complex Dynamics of Wishful Thinking: The Critical Positivity Ratio” by Brown et. al. (2013) “Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach” by Luthans and Youssef-Morgan (2017) “How to Lie with Statistics” by Huff (1954) “How do Simple Positive Activities Increase Well-Being?” by Lyubomirsky and Layous (2013) “PERMA+4: A Framework for Work-Related Wellbeing, Performance and Positive Organisational Psychology 2.0” by Donaldson et. al. (2022) “Exploring Meaning in LIfe Through a Brief Photo-Ethnographic Intervention Using Instagram: A Bayesian Growth Modelling Approach” by van Zyl et. al. (2020) “Flourishing Interventions: A practical guide to student development” by van Zyl and Stander (2013) “Ethical guidelines for positive psychology practice” by Jarden (2021) Presentations by Dr. van Zyl “Designing Effective Strengths-Based People Development Interventions” • Designing Effecti... “Strengths Based Development Interventions” • Strengths Based P... “Strengths-Based Development: How to Identify and Use Your Strengths” • Strengths-Based D... To view other episodes of TMWBS on Youtube, see / @ucst6c0odrlqo4-b... To view daily short clips of TMWBS, see https://www.youtube.com/@thementalwel... To listen to TMWBS on Spotify, see https://open.spotify.com/show/4yAzyeo... To view TMWBS on Tik Tok, see https://www.tiktok.com/@tmwbspodcast To view TMWBS on Instagram, see https://www.instagram.com/tmwbshow/?n...
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Masterdocs of EA community building guides and resources, published by Irene H on March 7, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. TLDR: I made a comprehensive overview of EA curricula, event organization guides, and syllabi, as well as an overview of resources on EA community building, communications, strategy, and more. The EA community builders I shared them with up to now found them really helpful. Context Together with Jelle Donders, I co-founded the university group at Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands last summer. We followed the UGAP mentorship program last semester and have been thinking a lot about events and programs to organize for our EA group and about general EA community-building strategies. There is a big maze of Google docs containing resources on this, but none of them gives a complete and updated overview. I wanted to share two resources for EA community builders I've been working on over the past months. Both I made initially as references for myself, but when I shared them with other community builders, they found them quite helpful. Therefore, I'd now like to share them more widely, so that others can hopefully have the same benefits. EA Eindhoven Syllabi Collection There are many lists of EA curricula, event organization guides, and syllabi, but none of them are complete. Therefore, I made a document to which I save everything of that nature I come across, with the aim of getting a somewhat better overview of everything out there I also went through other lists of this nature and saved all relevant documents to this collection, so it should be a one-stop shop. It is currently 27 pages long and I don't know of another list that is more exhaustive. (Also compared to the EA Groups Resource Centre, which only offers a few curated resources per topic). I update this document regularly when I come across new resources. When we want to organize something new at my group, we have a look at this document to see whether someone else has done the thing we want to do already so we can save time, or just to get some inspiration. You can find the document here. Community Building Readings I also made a document that contains a lot of resources on EA community building, communications, strategy, and more, related to the EA movement as a whole and to EA groups specifically, that are not specific guides for organizing concrete events, programs, or campaigns, but are aimed at getting a better understanding of more general thinking, strategy and criticism of the EA community. You can find the document here. Disclaimers for both documents I do not necessarily endorse/recommend the resources and advice in these documents. My sole aim with these documents is to provide an overview of the space of the thinking and resources around EA community building, not to advocate for one particular way of going about it. These documents are probably really overwhelming, but my aim was to gather a comprehensive overview of all resources, as opposed to linking only 1 or 2 recommendations, which is the way the Groups Resources Centre or the GCP EA Student Groups Handbook are organized. The way I sorted things into categories will always remain artificial as some boundaries are blurry and some things fit into multiple categories. How to use these documents Using the table of contents or Ctrl + F + [what you're looking for] probably works best for navigation Please feel free to place comments and make suggestions if you have additions! When you add something new, please add a source (name of the group and/or person who made the resource) wherever possible to give people the credit they're due and to facilitate others reaching out to the creator if they have more questions. In case of questions, feedback or comments, please reach out to info@eaeindhoven.nl. I hope ...
The computer chip shortage has prompted Dr Geert van Kollenburg and his colleagues at Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands, to find data-driven methods to optimise chip manufacturing processes. As part of the MadeIn4 project, they have developed a predictive discarding framework in which quality predictions from artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are used to decide on whether to discard an unfinished product. This approach can improve both the profitability and sustainability of manufacturing processes. Read more in Research OutreachRead their original research: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2103471
Earn additional income by sharing your opinion on userinterviews.com!Episode Resources:Alexander's TwitterAlexander's ResearchAwesome Code ReviewsPapers:An exploratory study on confusion in code reviewsEmotions and Perceived Productivity of Software Developers at the WorkplaceRecognizing developers' emotions while programmingGendered Experiences of Software Engineers During the COVID-19 CrisisDeveloper experience research paper About Alexander SerebrenikAlexander is a Full Professor of Social Software Engineering at the Software Engineering and Technology cluster of Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e). Alexander's research goal is to facilitate evolution of software by taking into account social aspects of software development.
Ron Wakkary is a professor of design at Simon Fraser University's School of Interactive Arts and Technology in Canada. He is also a professor, holding the Chair of Design for More Than Human-Centered Worlds, in the industrial design department at Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands.Ron is the founder of the design research studio Everyday Design Studio (EDS). At EDS, he works with Will Odom and an evolving cast of students to produce multi-disciplinary design research that is highly engaged with the practice and craft of design. For UX designers and industrial designers looking for ideas and inspiration from social sciences, humanities, and philosophy executed in design artifacts, the work from EDS is a fantastic resource.Ron recently published the book Things We Could Design: For More Than Human-Centered Worlds via MIT Press. The book packages his research focused on “post-humanist design” rather than human-centered design, bringing non-human stakeholders like nature, climate, and biological diversity into the focus of design methodology.Transcript: https://designdisciplin.com/ron:: Related Links+ Book: Design Research through Practice by Koskinen et al.: https://geni.us/design-research-thr+ Book: Discipline & Punish by Michel Foucault: https://geni.us/discipline-and-punish+ Everyday Design Studio: https://eds.siat.sfu.ca/+ Book: In Praise of Shadows by Junichiro Tanizaki: https://geni.us/in-praise-of-shadows+ Book: Reinventing Organizations by Frederic Laloux: https://geni.us/reinventing-org+ Book: Staying with the Trouble by Donna Haraway: https://geni.us/staying-with-the-troub+ Book: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism by Shoshana Zuboff: https://geni.us/age-of-surveillance+ Book: The Overstory by Richard Powers: https://geni.us/the-overstory+ Book: The Spell of the Sensuous by David Abram: https://geni.us/spell-of-the-sensuous+ Book: Things We Could Design by Ron Wakkary: https://geni.us/things-we-could-design+ Book: Vibrant Matter by Jane Bennett: https://geni.us/vibrant-matter+ Book: What Things Do by Peter-Paul Verbeek: https://geni.us/what-things-doFull list of related links: https://designdisciplin.com/ron :: Connect with Design Disciplin+ Website: http://designdisciplin.com+ Podcast: http://podcast.designdisciplin.com+ Instagram: http://instagram.com/designdisciplin/+ Twitter: http://twitter.com/designdisciplin/+ YouTube: http://youtube.com/designdisciplin:: Connect with Ron+ Twitter: https://twitter.com/ronwakkary+ Everyday Design Studio: http://eds.siat.sfu.ca/:: Episode Bookmarks00:00:00 Intro00:01:26 Ron's Story00:13:35 Research through Design00:18:54 Ron's Practice00:22:26 The Core Message in Ron's Book00:27:30 How To Put the Book in Practice00:34:45 "Designer as Biography / Force / Speaking Subject / Intensities and Origins"00:51:57 The Scope of Design vs. Other Disciplines00:58:50 "Nomadic Practice"01:21:55 Book Recommendations 01:27:00 What's Next for Ron01:33:00 Closing
Clinical Trial Podcast | Conversations with Clinical Research Experts
This is a special episode on risk management. It is important to understand what dictates the work we do as clinical research professionals and how our work fits into the bigger picture of medical product development. This episode serves exactly that purpose. You'll be introduced to ISO 14971 Application of risk management to medical devices and learn about its relationship to ISO 14155 Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects — Good clinical practice. You'll also understand key terminology around risks, how to define risk, what's special about clinical studies with respect to risk management, and much more. Our guest today is Bijan Elahi. Bijan has worked in risk management for medical devices for over 29 years at the largest medical device companies in the world, as well as small startups. He is a technical fellow and Medtronic corporate advisor on safety risk management of. medical devices. In this capacity, he offers education and consulting on risk management to all Medtronic business units, worldwide. Bijan is a lecturer at Eindhoven University of Technology (Netherlands), where he teaches risk management to doctoral students in engineering. At the invitation of the FDA, he also teaches a graduate course on medical device risk management at Drexel University in Philadelphia. Bijan is the founder of MedTech Safety, Inc., an education and advisory company. He has educated over 6,500 individuals worldwide. Bijan is a frequently invited speaker at international professional conferences, and is also a contributor to ISO 14971, the international standard on the application of risk management to medical devices. Last but not least, he is the author of Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices, published by Elsevier publishing. Enjoy! Sponsor: This podcast is brought to you by Slope. Slope provides an online eClinical Supply Chain Management (eCSCM) platform for sponsors and research sites collaborating on complex, sample-intensive, early-stage clinical trials. The Slope eCSCM platform reduces clinical trial risks, reigns in costs, improves the productivity of clinical trial collaborators, and increases subject retention by moving the manual, spreadsheet-driven, and error-prone processes used to manage and track clinical supplies and biological samples to a digital platform. To learn more, visit slope.io and ask to speak with a solutions coordinator today.
Welcome to Cyrus Says CnB presented by Volvo Car India with petcare partner - Heads Up For Tails!On Cock & Bull today, we are joined by Sriraam & Silverie. Today, Cyrus is teaching people the correct ways of speaking the English language. In the show: Cyrus, Sriraam & Silverie talk about sports, celebrity tantrums, the concept of ‘unconscious masturbation,' and how Cyrus' Instagram is slowly turning NSFW. And they also discussed the congress presidential elections. Tune in for this and much more!Today's HUFT Pet Tales Story is about the Indian army dog named Axel, who helped in locating the position of a terrorist during a high-stakes anti-terror operation in Jammu & Kashmir.The sustainability story for the day powered by the XC40 Recharge comes from Holland, where some students of the Eindhoven University of Technology have built a car that captures more carbon than it emits.Connect with Volvo Car India on:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/volvocarsin…Twitter: https://twitter.com/volvocarsinYouTube: https://youtube.com/c/VolvoCarsIndiaConnect with Heads Up For Tails on:Website: https://headsupfortails.comInstagram: https://instagram.com/headsupfortails?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HeadsUpForTails/YouTube: https://youtube.com/c/HeadsUpForTailsOfficialCheck out Cyrus Says merch:ivm.today/3PLKo1mYou can follow Sriraam on Instagram at @sriraampYou can follow Antariksh on Instagram at @antarikshtStream the podcast on major platforms like Spotify, Apple Podcasts, & Google PodcastsDo send in AMA questions for Cyrus by tweeting them to @cyrussaysin or emailing them at whatcyrussays@gmail.comDon't forget to follow Cyrus Broacha on Instagram @cyrus_broacha (https://www.instagram.com/cyrus_broacha)In case you're late to the party and want to catch up on previous episodes of Cyrus Says you can do so at: www.ivmpodcasts.com/cyrussaysYou can listen to this show and other awesome shows on the new and improved IVM Podcasts App on Android: https://ivm.today/android or iOS:https://ivm.today/ios
Joseph chats with Anne Scheel. Anne is currently a postdoc at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam but will be starting as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Methodology and Statistics at Utrecht University in mid October. Anne is a meta-scientist who is interested in which research and publication practices can improve the reproducibility of the published literature, and how researchers can be encouraged to design more falsifiable and informative studies. She did her PhD at Eindhoven University of Technology, followed by a postdoc project at VU Amsterdam and CWTS Leiden. In this episode we chat about her recent publications in which she argues that most claims in the psychology literature are so critically underspecified that attempts to empirically evaluate them are doomed to failure. She also argues that researchers should focus more on non-confirmatory research activities to obtain the inputs necessary to make hypothesis tests informative.WE NOW HAVE A SUBSTACK! Stay up to date with the pod and become part of the ever-growing community :) https://stanfordpsypod.substack.com/If you found this episode interesting at all, consider leaving us a good rating! It just takes a second but will allow us to reach more people and make them excited about psychology.LinksAnne's papers:Scheel, A. M. (2022). Why most psychological research findings are not even wrong. Infant and Child Development, 31(1), e2295Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744-755Paper on strategic ambiguity: Frankenhuis, W., Panchanathan, K., & Smaldino, P. E. (2022). Strategic ambiguity in the social sciencesAnne's Twitter @annemscheelAnne's blog 100% CIJoseph's Twitter @outa_josephPodcast Twitter @StanfordPsyPodPodcast Substack https://stanfordpsypod.substack.com/Let us know what you thought of this episode, or of the podcast! :) stanfordpsychpodcast@gmail.com
------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Leonid Tiokhin is Research Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study at the University of Amsterdam, and a postdoctoral researcher at the Eindhoven University of Technology. Dr. Tiokhin is a meta-scientist who studies the forces that shape how scientists do their work and make inferences from the populations that they study. Much of his research focuses on how incentive structures affect scientific efficiency and reliability, and how we can improve the recognition and reward structures in science. In this episode, we talk about the institution of science and the production of scientific knowledge, with a focus on the social sciences. We start by talking about the study of science as a social phenomenon, incentives structures in science, scientific efficiency and scientific reliability, deception and honesty in academic publishing, and replications. We get specifically into the social sciences, and discuss evolutionary approaches, problems with cross-cultural research, and testing hypotheses. Finally, we talk about scientific models and how they relate to reality, and if potential reforms to science should apply to it generally or to specific fields. -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: KARIN LIETZCKE, ANN BLANCHETTE, PER HELGE LARSEN, LAU GUERREIRO, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, HERBERT GINTIS, RUTGER VOS, RICARDO VLADIMIRO, CRAIG HEALY, OLAF ALEX, PHILIP KURIAN, JONATHAN VISSER, JAKOB KLINKBY, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, PAULINA BARREN, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ARTHUR KOH, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, SUSAN PINKER, PABLO SANTURBANO, SIMON COLUMBUS, PHIL KAVANAGH, JORGE ESPINHA, CORY CLARK, MARK BLYTH, ROBERTO INGUANZO, MIKKEL STORMYR, ERIC NEURMANN, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, BERNARD HUGUENEY, ALEXANDER DANNBAUER, FERGAL CUSSEN, YEVHEN BODRENKO, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, DON ROSS, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, OZLEM BULUT, NATHAN NGUYEN, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, J.W., JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, IDAN SOLON, ROMAIN ROCH, DMITRY GRIGORYEV, TOM ROTH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, AL ORTIZ, NELLEKE BAK, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, NICK GOLDEN, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS P. FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, DENISE COOK, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, TRADERINNYC, AND MAX BEILBY! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, IAN GILLIGAN, LUIS CAYETANO, TOM VANEGDOM, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, VEGA GIDEY, THOMAS TRUMBLE, AND NUNO ELDER! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MICHAL RUSIECKI, ROSEY, JAMES PRATT, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, AND BOGDAN KANIVETS!
Conformance checking is, regrettably, very often an omitted process mining technique. Is that rightfully so, though? To tell us more about why conformance checking is on the rise and why you should pay attention, we host Boudewijn van Dongen, professor at Eindhoven University of Technology and co-author of the book Conformance Checking - Relating Processes and Models.
Our guest is Dagnachew Birru (PhD) who is currently the Global Head of R&D at Quantiphi. Dr. Dagnachew has many years of experience as an idea-driven technology researcher, developer, and leader in systems employing Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and smart algorithms, resulting in 50+ issued patents. He was born and raised in Northern Ethiopia. Dr. Birru grew up in a very difficult time where there were no role models who could inspire him professionally. He was curious to learn about technology that he used to disassemble his dad's radio to learn where the sound was coming from and how it worked. He used to do some work to financially help his family. Dagnachew was a bright young man that he betted on himself that when he sat for a national exam he said "If I pass this exam, I will move forward and continue my education or else I will be a businessman". He passed and went to Addis Ababa University to study Electrical Engineering. Dr. Birru had high grade and the university hired him as a lecturer. After serving for about a year, he and his friend were able to secure a scholarship in Netherland where Phlips was funding the program. He studied Master of Science -Electrical and Electronics Engineering at Eindhoven University of Technology and Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Electronics Engineering and Signal Processing from Technische Universiteit Delft. His PhD thesis helped him secure his job at Philips in New York, USA. Dr. Birru have worked at Philips, Philips Lighting & Signify all of which are Philips companies and he served in many different levels started from a researcher to team leadership roles and to more higher positions such as Head of Research & Sr. Director, Head of Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Center of Excellence. He is currently Global Head of R&D at Quantiphi where he focuses further shape, build and lead a world-class R&D function, reimagining business with AI-led solutions, and laying the foundation for the next phase of growth. Quantiphi, Founded in 2013, is an award-winning AI-first digital engineering company driven by the desire to solve transformational problems at the heart of business. As always, I was privileged to learn Dagnachew Birru's Tech Journey first hand. I would like to thank Dr. Birru for his time and willingness to share his tech journey and respond to all of the questions from audiences and myself. I would also like to thank everyone who made it to the live session on clubhouse. Please help us spread this wonderful recording here on LinkedIn & all of the social media platforms. Share | Comment | Like Follow Teferi Kassa | Follow Habesha in Tech