Podcasts about iqos

Philip Morris International reafirma su compromiso con la no venta a menores de edad y su estrategia de productos sin humo en República Dominicana. Conversamos con Leticia de Andrés, Gerente de Comunicación Externa para CARICAM, sobre el futuro del consumo responsable y las alternativas libres de humo.

In this episode: Philip Morris, the Big Tobacco giant best known as the maker of Marlboro cigarettes, helped Ron DeSantis defeat ballot measures last fall that would have legalized marijuana and protected abortion rights. A few months later, the Florida governor did a favor for Philip Morris: Allowing the company to sell its IQOS product line free of state tobacco taxes. And now Florida lawmakers are advancing company-backed bills that would cement that decision into state law. Show notesThe bills discussed in today's show:Senate Bill 1418 — Heated Tobacco ProductsHouse Bill 785 — Heated Tobacco ProductsHouse Bill 1517 — Civil Liability for the Wrongful Death of an Unborn Child House Bill 1219 — Employment AgreementsSenate Bill 806 — Florida Trust CodeHouse Bill 1173 — Florida Trust CodeDeSantis grants tax favor for Philip Morris after $500,000 gift Get full access to Seeking Rents at jasongarcia.substack.com/subscribe

Philip Morris ist der größte Tabakkonzern der Welt und bekannt für Marken wie Marlboro. Doch das Unternehmen hat sich das Ziel gesetzt, bis 2030 den Großteil seines Umsatzes ohne die Zigarette zu erzielen. Veronika Rost ist Deutschlandchefin von Philip Morris und muss deswegen daran arbeiten, den Umsatzbringer des Unternehmens abzuschaffen. "Wir wollen keine Zigaretten mehr verkaufen", sagt Rost, und zitiert damit einen ihrer Vorgänger auf dem Chefsessel des Konzerns. Dabei wäre die Kundschaft vorhanden. 20 Prozent der Frauen und Männer ab 18 Jahren in Deutschland rauchen. Tendenz leicht sinkend.Die Zukunft sieht Philip Morris in Tabakerhitzern, die etwa unter der Marke Iqos vertrieben werden. "Viele denken, Alternativen sind genauso schädlich wie die Zigarette - dabei sagt sogar das Deutsche Krebsforschungszentrum, dass sie weniger krebserregend sind." Kritiker sehen in der Strategie von Philip Morris dennoch einen Versuch, die Marktstellung des Unternehmens langfristig zu sichern. Rost hingegen kritisiert, dass Regulierung den Abschied von der Zigarette noch erschwere. "Ich stimme der Aussage meines Chefs zu: Die Zigarette kann man in Deutschland am einfachsten verkaufen." Denn Zigaretten seien bekannt, die neue Technologie hingegen werde kritisch beäugt und noch strenger reguliert.Was Philip Morris konkret an der Regulierung in Deutschland kritisiert, was andere Länder wie Japan besser machen, und warum Werke in Deutschland geschlossen werden mussten, erzählt Veronika Rost in der neuen Folge von "So techt Deutschland." Sie haben Fragen für Frauke Holzmeier und Andreas Laukat? Dann schreiben Sie eine E-Mail an sotechtdeutschland@ntv.de Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://datenschutz.ad-alliance.de/podcast.html Wir verarbeiten im Zusammenhang mit dem Angebot unserer Podcasts Daten. Wenn Sie der automatischen Übermittlung der Daten widersprechen wollen, klicken Sie hier: https://datenschutz.ad-alliance.de/podcast.htmlAlle Rabattcodes und Infos zu unseren Werbepartnern finden Sie hier: https://linktr.ee/sotechtdeutschlandUnsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://art19.com/privacy. Die Datenschutzrichtlinien für Kalifornien sind unter https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info abrufbar.

A Pride melletti kiállás és a rákosrendezői teendők után Szabó Bálint miatt szakadt félbe a Fővárosi Közgyűlés Telex     2025-02-26 10:18:01     Belföld Szentkirályi Alexandra Kártérítés Budapest Pride "Pride volt és Pride lesz", mondták a képviselők, Szentkirályi Alexandra még könyvet is kapott a témában. A rákosrendezői terveknél a kártalanítás és a tervpályázat is előkerült, de egy ponton Szabó Bálint is megjelent. Gulyás Gergely: Lehet Pride, de nem úgy 24.hu     2025-02-26 11:00:25     Gazdaság Gulyás Gergely GDP Bruttó hazai termék Rogán Antal Budapest Pride A kancelláriaminisztert nem csupán gazdasági témákról kérdeztük a Dellában: a büdzsén, a jóléti intézkedések fedezetén és a GDP reális mértékén túl szó esett a Pride zártkörűvé tételéről, a külföldi befolyásszerzésről, sőt, Rogán Antalról is megtudtunk egy fontos információt. Magyar Péter testvére nagyot húzott: ATV-s és ex-új indexes újságírót szerződtetett a Kontrollhoz Media1     2025-02-26 12:27:02     Karrier Magyar Péter Index Mészáros Lőrinc A Media1 információi szerint újabb újságíró csatlakozott Magyar Márton portáljához, a Kontrollhoz. Virág Sára, a Magyar Péter által időnként propagandistázott ATV-től távozó online szerkesztő is elkezdett a Tisza Párthoz közeli lapnak dolgozni, ahol ezzel 15 fősre duzzadt a szerkesztőség. A Kontroll új munkatársa korábban a Mészáros Lőrinc-közeli I Szigorú előírásokra készülnek a dohányboltok Forbes     2025-02-26 14:18:07     Cégvilág Cigaretta IQ Trafik Odacsapnak az újfajta dohánytermékeknek, mint amilyen az Iqos és a snüssz. A termékekről szóló tájékoztatást is szigorúan szabályozzák. Palácsik-Ráthonyi Tímea az anyává válás áldozatokkal teli útjáról beszél hamarosan a Fókuszban rtl.hu     2025-02-26 11:00:57     Bulvár Vajna Tímea Palácsik-Ráthonyi Tímea, korábban Vajna Tímea, hosszas küzdelmek és orvosi beavatkozások után végre megvalósíthatja álmát: édesanya lesz. A 42 éves Tímea számos próbálkozás, hormonkezelés és műtét után bejelentette, hogy kisfiát, Bent egy béranya hordja ki, de emellett ő maga is állapotos lett. Volt szolgálati lakása miatt támadja a kormánymédia Ruszin-Szendi Romuluszt 444.hu     2025-02-26 13:35:16     Belföld Luxus A volt vezérkari főnök még mindig nem adott egyértelmű választ a luxusfelújításban játszott szerepére. Az sem derült ki, hogy a kormány miért nem akadályozta meg az értelmetlen állami pénzszórást. Áfa-visszatérítés: jó hír a nyugdíjasoknak, tisztáztak egy félreértést Startlap Vásárlás     2025-02-26 10:30:39     Gazdaság Nyugdíj Áfa A nyugdíjasok külön kártyát kapnak majd az áfa-visszatérítés érvényesítéséhez. Az államtitkár egy félreértést is tisztázott. Törökországban tárgyalnak újra a nagyok Magyar Hírlap     2025-02-26 13:44:15     Külföld Törökország Az orosz külügyminiszter bejelentése alapján csütörtökön tárgyal ismét Oroszország és az Egyesült Államok. Trágár magyar rendszámot rakott autójára Vezess     2025-02-26 14:42:36     Autó-motor Miami Rendszám Lamborghini Miami utcáit járja egy lila Lamborghini Urus, amelynek a rendszámtáblájáról a jól ismert magyar kötőszó, akarom mondani szitokszó, köszön vissza. Orbán Viktor csuklani kezdhet, ha meghallja, mire jutott Trump és Zelenszkij mfor.hu     2025-02-26 12:45:06     Belföld Ukrajna Orbán Viktor Volodimir Zelenszkij A héten már alá is írhatják az egyezményt, amely biztosítja a "további harc jogát" Ukrajnának. Továbbra is zárva Debrecen legendás étterme Sokszínű vidék     2025-02-26 15:53:25     Utazás Hajdú-Bihar Debrecen A Barabás Étterem 1968-ban nyitott Debrecen első önkiszolgáló éttermeként, de nem tudni, hogy fogad-e vendégeket a jövőben. Kiderült a Schumacher család titka, az F1-pilótákon kívül létezik még egy testvér Sportal     2025-02-26 10:33:00     Forma1 Michael Schumacher Az In Touch szúrta ki, hogy Michael és Ralf Schumacheren kívül létezik még egy testvér, akinek az F1-pióták édesapja adott életet. Arne Slot keményen kritizálta a Liverpool formán kívüli csatárát Rangadó     2025-02-26 11:08:06     Foci Hollandia Liverpool A kihagyott helyzet belefér a holland edzőnél, de az már nem, ha egy játékos nem szakad meg a pályán. Az éjszakai fagyokat egyre tavasziasabb nappalok követik Kiderül     2025-02-26 14:12:12     Időjárás Tavasz Csapadék A csapadék fokozatosan kelet felé tolódik, nyugat felől pedig elkezd felszakadozni a felhőzet. Bár szombaton még inkább a felhők, vasárnap már a napsütés lesz túlsúlyban. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

A Pride melletti kiállás és a rákosrendezői teendők után Szabó Bálint miatt szakadt félbe a Fővárosi Közgyűlés Telex     2025-02-26 10:18:01     Belföld Szentkirályi Alexandra Kártérítés Budapest Pride "Pride volt és Pride lesz", mondták a képviselők, Szentkirályi Alexandra még könyvet is kapott a témában. A rákosrendezői terveknél a kártalanítás és a tervpályázat is előkerült, de egy ponton Szabó Bálint is megjelent. Gulyás Gergely: Lehet Pride, de nem úgy 24.hu     2025-02-26 11:00:25     Gazdaság Gulyás Gergely GDP Bruttó hazai termék Rogán Antal Budapest Pride A kancelláriaminisztert nem csupán gazdasági témákról kérdeztük a Dellában: a büdzsén, a jóléti intézkedések fedezetén és a GDP reális mértékén túl szó esett a Pride zártkörűvé tételéről, a külföldi befolyásszerzésről, sőt, Rogán Antalról is megtudtunk egy fontos információt. Magyar Péter testvére nagyot húzott: ATV-s és ex-új indexes újságírót szerződtetett a Kontrollhoz Media1     2025-02-26 12:27:02     Karrier Magyar Péter Index Mészáros Lőrinc A Media1 információi szerint újabb újságíró csatlakozott Magyar Márton portáljához, a Kontrollhoz. Virág Sára, a Magyar Péter által időnként propagandistázott ATV-től távozó online szerkesztő is elkezdett a Tisza Párthoz közeli lapnak dolgozni, ahol ezzel 15 fősre duzzadt a szerkesztőség. A Kontroll új munkatársa korábban a Mészáros Lőrinc-közeli I Szigorú előírásokra készülnek a dohányboltok Forbes     2025-02-26 14:18:07     Cégvilág Cigaretta IQ Trafik Odacsapnak az újfajta dohánytermékeknek, mint amilyen az Iqos és a snüssz. A termékekről szóló tájékoztatást is szigorúan szabályozzák. Palácsik-Ráthonyi Tímea az anyává válás áldozatokkal teli útjáról beszél hamarosan a Fókuszban rtl.hu     2025-02-26 11:00:57     Bulvár Vajna Tímea Palácsik-Ráthonyi Tímea, korábban Vajna Tímea, hosszas küzdelmek és orvosi beavatkozások után végre megvalósíthatja álmát: édesanya lesz. A 42 éves Tímea számos próbálkozás, hormonkezelés és műtét után bejelentette, hogy kisfiát, Bent egy béranya hordja ki, de emellett ő maga is állapotos lett. Volt szolgálati lakása miatt támadja a kormánymédia Ruszin-Szendi Romuluszt 444.hu     2025-02-26 13:35:16     Belföld Luxus A volt vezérkari főnök még mindig nem adott egyértelmű választ a luxusfelújításban játszott szerepére. Az sem derült ki, hogy a kormány miért nem akadályozta meg az értelmetlen állami pénzszórást. Áfa-visszatérítés: jó hír a nyugdíjasoknak, tisztáztak egy félreértést Startlap Vásárlás     2025-02-26 10:30:39     Gazdaság Nyugdíj Áfa A nyugdíjasok külön kártyát kapnak majd az áfa-visszatérítés érvényesítéséhez. Az államtitkár egy félreértést is tisztázott. Törökországban tárgyalnak újra a nagyok Magyar Hírlap     2025-02-26 13:44:15     Külföld Törökország Az orosz külügyminiszter bejelentése alapján csütörtökön tárgyal ismét Oroszország és az Egyesült Államok. Trágár magyar rendszámot rakott autójára Vezess     2025-02-26 14:42:36     Autó-motor Miami Rendszám Lamborghini Miami utcáit járja egy lila Lamborghini Urus, amelynek a rendszámtáblájáról a jól ismert magyar kötőszó, akarom mondani szitokszó, köszön vissza. Orbán Viktor csuklani kezdhet, ha meghallja, mire jutott Trump és Zelenszkij mfor.hu     2025-02-26 12:45:06     Belföld Ukrajna Orbán Viktor Volodimir Zelenszkij A héten már alá is írhatják az egyezményt, amely biztosítja a "további harc jogát" Ukrajnának. Továbbra is zárva Debrecen legendás étterme Sokszínű vidék     2025-02-26 15:53:25     Utazás Hajdú-Bihar Debrecen A Barabás Étterem 1968-ban nyitott Debrecen első önkiszolgáló éttermeként, de nem tudni, hogy fogad-e vendégeket a jövőben. Kiderült a Schumacher család titka, az F1-pilótákon kívül létezik még egy testvér Sportal     2025-02-26 10:33:00     Forma1 Michael Schumacher Az In Touch szúrta ki, hogy Michael és Ralf Schumacheren kívül létezik még egy testvér, akinek az F1-pióták édesapja adott életet. Arne Slot keményen kritizálta a Liverpool formán kívüli csatárát Rangadó     2025-02-26 11:08:06     Foci Hollandia Liverpool A kihagyott helyzet belefér a holland edzőnél, de az már nem, ha egy játékos nem szakad meg a pályán. Az éjszakai fagyokat egyre tavasziasabb nappalok követik Kiderül     2025-02-26 14:12:12     Időjárás Tavasz Csapadék A csapadék fokozatosan kelet felé tolódik, nyugat felől pedig elkezd felszakadozni a felhőzet. Bár szombaton még inkább a felhők, vasárnap már a napsütés lesz túlsúlyban. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

La Fondation pour un monde sans fumée (Foundation for a Smoke-Free World), créée en 2017 par le géant du tabac Philip Morris International (PMI), est au cœur de nombreuses controverses. Si elle affiche comme mission de lutter contre les méfaits du tabagisme, son financement et ses objectifs réels suscitent des critiques virulentes de la part des experts de santé publique et des organismes de lutte contre le tabac. Voici pourquoi cette initiative est si controversée. 1. Un financement issu de l'industrie du tabacLa fondation est entièrement financée par Philip Morris International, à hauteur de 1 milliard de dollars sur 12 ans. Ce financement massif pose un problème de crédibilité : comment une organisation sponsorisée par une multinationale dont les profits dépendent de la vente de cigarettes peut-elle réellement œuvrer pour réduire le tabagisme ? Beaucoup y voient un conflit d'intérêts flagrant, accusant la fondation de servir avant tout les intérêts stratégiques de PMI. 2. Promotion des produits alternatifs de Philip MorrisLa Fondation met fortement en avant les produits de « réduction des risques », comme les cigarettes électroniques ou le tabac chauffé, notamment le dispositif IQOS de Philip Morris. Ces alternatives, bien que potentiellement moins nocives que les cigarettes traditionnelles, ne sont pas sans risques pour la santé. Les détracteurs estiment que la fondation utilise ces arguments pour détourner l'attention des méfaits des cigarettes classiques tout en promouvant des produits qui perpétuent l'addiction à la nicotine. 3. Stratégie de « blanchiment d'image »De nombreux experts considèrent la Fondation pour un monde sans fumée comme une opération de greenwashing ou de healthwashing. En créant cette initiative, Philip Morris cherche à se repositionner comme un acteur responsable de la santé publique, tout en continuant à produire et vendre des cigarettes. Cette démarche pourrait détourner l'attention des actions législatives contre le tabac ou des poursuites judiciaires liées à ses pratiques passées. 4. Rejet massif par la communauté scientifiqueDes organismes comme l'Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS) et des associations anti-tabac dénoncent cette fondation comme une tentative de manipulation. L'OMS a explicitement demandé aux gouvernements et aux institutions de ne pas collaborer avec elle, rappelant que les conventions internationales de lutte contre le tabac, comme la Convention-cadre pour la lutte antitabac, recommandent une distance stricte avec l'industrie du tabac. 5. Risques pour la recherche indépendanteLa fondation finance des études scientifiques, mais ces financements sont perçus comme biaisés. Les experts craignent que cela n'influence les résultats pour soutenir des conclusions favorables aux produits alternatifs de PMI, menaçant ainsi l'intégrité de la recherche sur la lutte contre le tabagisme. En conclusion La Fondation pour un monde sans fumée est controversée car elle est perçue comme une stratégie sophistiquée de Philip Morris pour redorer son image et défendre ses intérêts commerciaux. Plutôt qu'une véritable initiative de santé publique, elle est souvent qualifiée d'outil de lobbying déguisé, sapant les efforts mondiaux pour réduire le tabagisme. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

García Luna, secretario de Seguridad Pública en el sexenio de Felipe Calderón, pasará casi 40 años en la cárcel en Estados Unidos, luego de ser hallado culpable de colaborar con el Cártel de Sinaloa. Ya son 100,000 mexicanos los que han dejado de fumar gracias a IQOS. Conoce los detalles. Capítulos 00:00 - Introducción 00:33 - La condena de García Luna 02:17 - 100,000 mexicanos han dejado de fumar Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Nem, nem egy új Rubik kockáról van szó! Múlt héten kihagytuk a podcastet, de cserébe elmerültünk egy csökkentett kockázatú termékekkel foglalkozó konferencia előadásaiban. Az esemény tele volt tudománnyal, és néhány nagyon érdekes standdal. Ha kíváncsi vagy, hogy mi minden történt, hallgasd meg, hogyan kockultunk a kockában! Show notes Technovation élménybeszámoló

An undercover sting led by grassroots volunteer group Vape-Free Kids NZ has found more than 20 stores across Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch are selling IQOS heated tobacco devices - despite them now being in breach of Government regulations. Vape Free Kids spokesperson Anna Stewart spoke to Corin Dann.

Associate Health Minister Casey Costello's plan to encourage smokers to switch to Heated Tobacco Products has hit a major snag with the sole supplier Philip Morris forced to pull its IQOS device from sale. Guyon Espiner spoke to Corin Dann.

Associate Health Minister, Casey Costello, is pushing for smokers to switch to Heated Tobacco Products, otherwise known as HTPs, as an alternative to other forms of smoking, for what she says is a part of a solution to try work towards Smokefree 2025. The plan, which aims to get 7000 people to switch to HTPs, will result in a cut of 50% to excise tax to the products at a cost of up to $216 million. Currently, tobacco giant, Philip Morris, owns a Monopoly of HTPs in New Zealand, which would mean that this company will solely profit off of the tax cuts. Many are concerned that Costello is prioritising profits over actually working towards lowering tobacco usage within Aotearoa. As well as this, Philip Morris' HTPs, known as IQOS' have recently been pulled from shelves over being classified as vapes, and therefore going against Labour's vaping regulations, which require vaping products to have child safety mechanisms, as well as having removable batteries.  News and Editorial Director, Joel, spoke to Professor of Health Economics at the University of Auckland, Paula Logelly, on Costello's push for HTPs, and whether she believes that Costello is putting money over people's health.

☆▶▶【新しいYouTubeチャンネル】 「地球人の99%が知らない情報」 YouTubeの字幕をつけて見てみてね！ https://youtube.com/@rengoku.aokimaru?si=D4iAsfbh5vm8vJwi ※初めて来た方は、下記の好きな方のラジオやYouTube、

Hallo ihr Stadionwürste. Es gibt wieder Kick Versteck wollte Gül euch sagen. Die Welt ist weiterhin zu Gast bei Freunden. Betonung auf ZU GAST. Es geht um Freundschaft und um Stadionhymnen. und darum dass Nico jetzt einen Dreifachstecker hat der sein Mikro, sein Beatmungsgerät und sein iQOS speist. Ilkan singt sehr schön und wird zu Unrecht von Justus dafür angegriffen. Justus dagegen singt sehr schlecht und gewinnt aber dafür den Pariser Geld Preis für gute Leistung. Ok Anpfiff

JE NE VEUX PLUS DE CIGARETTES SANS RIEN FAIRE!devoile de plus:https://www.claudiosaracino.com/prodotto/no-fumo-metodo-dcs/#cigarettes#commentarreterdefumer#clapAvec cet audio mp3 DCS d'Autohypnosi DCS, vous n'aimerez plus fumer des cigarettes de tout type, marque ou qualité, en suivant les instructions à la lettre, à l'épreuve des grands-pères et de la paresse.Cet audio mp3 DCS, très puissant et professionnel, peut également être utilisé pour aider un proche qui ne veut pas être aidé et qui vous fait désespérer et toujours dans un bon but. Ce ne sont que des mots hypnotiques DCS très puissants, créés astucieusement, ad hoc, entièrement naturels et sans effets secondaires qui vous amèneront à sortir de l'obscurité, de votre tunnel et à revoir la lumière, la vie, sans mais et sans si, réaliser le miracle de votre même esprit. Vous ne devez pas croire mais faire et changer votre destin, une fois pour toutes.Maintenant, vous pouvez rester où vous êtes et vous maudire, vous-même, votre destin, votre vie ou votre famille, ou monter à bord et avancer comme de nombreuses personnes dans le monde l'ont déjà fait, y compris des personnages célèbres...Le choix vous appartient seul...

Dal Marlboro Man fino alle IQOS, quando la pubblicità viene vietata i brand trovano strategie alternative. Compila il questionario -https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc07_ZTTCgpHvqGV3iAR0oJOJKQExKgtXfo1v3lj7AoAjGUdA/viewform Scopri altre storie nel mio libro - "Persone che pensano in grande" - https://amzn.to/475PihA Entra nel canale telegram - https://t.me/storiedibrand Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

“Grwm com o meu iqos!!!!!!!” Faço anos então não me ataquem hoje e dêem-me os parabéns, obrigada.

Alejandro Storni is a visionary rooted in the vibrant streets of Buenos Aires, effortlessly intertwines creativity into every facet of his life. Leading Shock Your Cocktail, he crafts immersive event experiences while championing CoolturaBA, a cultural cornerstone online honored by the City Government. As Senior Creative at Drago for IQOS global communication, Alejandro deftly navigates the dynamic realms of creativity, culture, and marketing. A respected educator at the Universidad Argentina de la Empresa (UADE), Alejandro's innovative teaching methods have earned him acclaim among peers and students alike. His entrepreneurial spirit expressed itself in Wimet, an inventive startup reshaping idle spaces for productions & events, sold in 2018. In all his endeavors, Alejandro's dedication to innovation and cultural enrichment shines through. With a fervent passion for turning ideas into reality, he seeks to inspire others and pushes the boundaries of creativity, enriching the cultural landscape one venture at a time. Alejandro is also a local advisor to Fearless Journeys and has helped organize so many great experiences in Argentina. He was our guest on Episode 139 of the Agents of Innovation podcast. You can also watch this episode on YouTube here: https://youtu.be/BTG5of9vCNY You can learn more about Alejandro Storni at: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alejandrostornithe Agents of Innovation podcast. Follow the Agents of Innovation podcast on: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AgentsOfInnovationPodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/innovationradio/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/agentinnovation You can support this podcast and our Fearless Journeys community on our Patreon account: www.patreon.com/fearlessjourneys You can also join our network through the Fearless Journeys community at: https://www.fearlessjourneys.org/

El misterio del hotel Nutibara , detalles , pormenores , experiencias paranormales. Dale play y comparte. 

Come smettere di fumare CON L'IPNOSI?scarica ora audio mp3 DCS dal titolo ADDIO SIGARETTE :https://claudiosaracino.com/prodotto/no-fumo-metodo-dcs/#tab-description#comesmetteredifumaresubito #comesmetteredifumaresigarette #smetteredifumare

La Première ministre Elisabeth Bornes l'avait annoncé sur RTL : les Puffs, ces cigarettes électroniques jetables aromatisées devraient être interdites et la proposition de loi sera discutée le 4 décembre à l'Assemblée nationale. En attendant le débat parlementaire, l'Alliance contre le tabac et l'institut BVA ont réalisé un nouveau sondage auprès des 13-16 ans quant à l'utilisation de ces produits. Le moins qu'on puisse dire, c'est que les résultats sont inquiétants.

Basti Hansen is a German director / photographer, living in Tel Aviv, working around the globe. In the last 9 years he directed, shot and edited over 450 global ad-campaigns, music videos, commercials, adventure films and passion projects. Basti worked with people like Lewis Hamilton, Will.I.Am, Valtteri Bottas, Devin Supertramp and Noa Kirel while shooting international campaigns for clients like Mercedes-Benz, Universal Music, Volkswagen, IQOS, Google, Mercedes-AMG, Microsoft as well as tourism boards and creative agencies around the world. Basti's style of working was recently described by a client as: “He has a radical, no-bullshit approach when it comes to crafting and delivering high-end imagery. It's fascinating and refreshing to watch him work.” [00:00:09] Six words: German director, photographer, global work, humility, connection, full heart. [00:04:12] Photographer's journey to success: Six words [00:09:33] We're all the same: humans. [00:15:15] Connecting with humans: photography. [00:19:59] Balance artistic integrity, commercialization in work. [00:25:32] Capture moments, build relationships: 6 words [00:30:23] Fatherhood changes life: Calmer, Balanced, Supportive. [00:35:31] Lifelong connection, natively linked. [00:40:32] Enriched lives, made them laugh, loyal. [00:44:55] Live life, not last words. GUEST: Basti Hansen

GP se sienta con Ali Raza, director de Phillip Morris en República Dominicana y el Caribe, para conversar sobre un producto que está revolucionando el mundo: IQOS

En este episodio, analizamos el caso de éxito de probablemente la mejor startup corporativa del siglo esta década: IQOS, la empresa de cigarrillos eléctricos que llegó a España en 2022 y que ahora están por todos lados revolucionando el sector del tabaco. ¿Quieres aprender más sobre este tipo de casos de éxito? Síguenos en nuestras RRSS: - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/marcandodiferencias_/ - TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@marcando.diferencias - Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5SYDOon6d53z04VBAdTq4p?si=3b4d5e22b29642bf - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/marcando-diferencias-podcast/ Y también puedes seguirnos a nosotros por aquí: - Diego Salete: https://www.linkedin.com/in/diego-salete-918ba313b/ - Álvaro Ruvira: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alvaro-ruvira/ #podcast #emprendimiento #iqos #casodeéxito #empresas #desarrollopersonal #startups #marcandodiferencias #startupculture #crecimientoempresarial

No programa desta semana, José de Pina assume que é tempo de "voltar a cancelar isto", fazendo alusão ao caso da transposição da guerra da Ucrânia para obras literárias - com os exemplos a livros sobre Anne Frank ou Auschwitz. Luana do Bem reclama das pessoas que se queixam de tudo, afirmando que essa onda de negatividade tem tendência a afetá-la cada vez mais. Luís Pedro Nunes fala sobre a onda dos 'DeInfluencers', com Carla Quevedo a queixar-se sobre o difícil processo de devolver uma máquina à IQOS. Com moderação de Pedro Boucherie Mendes, o Irritações foi emitido a 14 de abril, na SIC Radical, e terminou com o tema 'Mr. Writer' de Stereophonics.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Buon venerdì Stupefan! Cosa succede quando i proibizionisti al Governo sconfinano in restrizioni a sostanze legali? Lo scopriremo nel corso di questo nuovo episodio dedicato al nuovo disegno di legge, ora al vaglio dei tecnici del Ministero della Salute, che prevede una stretta significativa al consumo di nicotina all'aperto. Avete capito bene: presto potrebbe essere vietato fumare sigarette ed e-cig non solo alle fermate di metro, bus e treni, ma anche ai tavoli esterni di bar e ristoranti. Il motivo che ha spinto il Ministro della Salute Schillaci pare essere stato l'aumento di due punti e mezzo di percentuale della popolazione fumatrice durante il periodo della pandemia, che ha intaccato il costante calo del consumo degli ultimi vent'anni. Sulle barricate, gli insospettabili. Matteo Salvini reputa non congruo paragonare il fumo da combustione a quello vaporizzato e meno dannoso, per sé e per gli altri, chiedendo che il provvedimento tenga conto del fatto che "lo svapo" stia aiutando molti tabagisti a ridurre o ad interrompere il loro consumo. Dove l'abbiamo già sentita questa cosa che l'approccio alle sostanze deve essere laico e scientifico? Ve lo ricordiamo noi, ma non prima di raccontarvi come Meglio Legale ha denunciato il senatore Gasparri.Via col tasto play!Note dell'episodio: - Meglio Legale denuncia il sen. Gasparri: https://www.instagram.com/p/CpfgywSj_8s/ - Fumo, in arrivo la stretta anche all'esterno (esempi Nuova Zelanda e Australia): https://www.laredazione.net/fumo-in-arrivo-il-divieto-anche-allaperto/ - Salvini contro Schillaci: https://bit.ly/3FAtRtJ - La riduzione del danno per i fumatori: https://droghe.aduc.it/notizia/fumo+riduzione+danno+eurispes_135184.php - Il sito di Meglio Legale: https://megliolegale.it - Il sito di Radio Nolo: https://radionolo.it - La playlist Spotify di Stupefatti: https://spoti.fi/3vh3D8ZEntra in contatto con noi usando la mail stupefatticast@gmail.com o seguendo su Instagram il @stupefatti_podcast!

In dieser Episode sprechen wir ausführlich über das Thema Selbstständigkeit. Alessandro hat einen Fuß in beiden Welten. Zum einen ist er Unternehmer und zum anderen auch im Angestelltenverhältnis tätig. Für IQOS arbeitet Alessandro als Brand-Ambassador und gleichzeitig hat er zwei Firmen. „Yahya“ - ein arabischer Vorname mit der Bedeutung: das schöne im Leben - ist sein eigener Rosé, den er zusammen mit seinem Bruder, Nicolas, ins Leben gerufen hat. Außerdem baut sich Alessandro gerade noch eine Brand auf, und zwar einen hochwertigen Tequila. Lana Tequila ist seit 2 Jahren im Aufbau und wird dieses Jahr gelaunched. In das Erschaffen eines eigenen Produktes laufen viele Prozesse, die zu der Selbstständigkeit dazugehören. Was genau das ist, erfährst du in dieser Folge. Wir sprechen auch darüber, warum man mit seinen Schwächen transparent sein sollte und was das mit dem Aufbau eines Netzwerkes zu tun hat.

In this episode, Dr Katherine East talks about her recent article on heated tobacco product use. When conducting this research, Katie talked to former and current smokers who use IQOS to understand the words they use to describe themselves and what they do in relation to heated tobacco products. Katie and Rob then talk about how the language can reflect identity and how this can influence the risk of people relapsing to smoking or other forms of nicotine use. They discuss the importance of social norms and how language can play a substantial role in shaping those norms. Katie explains why some potential words that might have been used have since been discarded, including “heaters” and “IQOSers”. They also talk about different social circumstances and how heated tobacco use, vaping and smoking identities interact. Link to Katie's previous podcast“Lots of people refer to it as smoking still…. It also means less having to explain what it is because very few people have heard of IQOS”“The way that people refer to things and they way they think about themselves as product users can influence their behaviour.”“Whilst people referred to IQOS use as smoking they were very resistant to being identified as a smoker”. Original article: ‘It's not what you'd term normal smoking': a qualitative exploration of language used to describe heated tobacco product use and associated user identity by Katherine East and colleagues. Published in Addiction (2022). Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ucraina: caduto un elicottero nei pressi di Kiev, colpito un asilo. Tra le vittime bambini e il ministro dell'Interno Monastyrsky. In arrivo una nuova mobilitazione di soldati russi. Il punto con Marco Di Liddo, analista del CeSi (Centro Studi Internazionali). Bollette del gas in discesa a febbraio. Ne parliamo con Roberto Bianchini, economista di REF Ricerche, Professore di Corporate Finance all'Università Bocconi, direttore dell'Osservatorio Climate Finance e professore di Project Finance al Politecnico di Milano. Il ministro Schillaci: "All'esterno, in presenza di bambini e donne incinta, vietare sigarette e sigarette elettroniche". Cerchiamo di fare chiarezza sui rischi da sigarette normali, IQOS e sigarette elettroniche conRiccardo Polosa, direttore del CoEHAR, Centro di ricerca per la Riduzione dei danni dal fumo dell'Università di Catania.

É uma semana de lançamentos na subsidiária portuguesa da Philip Morris International: a fábrica de Sintra vai ter mais energia produzida através de painéis solares e está prestes a chegar aos consumidores nacionais a nova máquina de tabaco Iqos com menos cheiro e sem limpeza.

Oggi iniziamo a conoscere la prima causa di decesso per tumore nel mondo, ovvero il tumore al polmone. Quali tipi di tumore esistono? Sono davvero così diversi tra loro? Come possiamo evitarli? Vengono solo ai fumatori? Ci potete ascoltare su: Nostro Sito: https://dpenpodcast.wixsite.com/website . Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/it/podcast/dpen-scienza/id1517569764 . Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3SEfZMJXDmUDKCHHX1lewc?si=2ViP6N-9Qxu0uh2gPRBwqw . Spreaker: https://www.spreaker.com/user/dpen . E su tutte le app principali di streaming.Seguiteci anche sui nostri social dove potrete anche commentare le puntate e comunicare con noiGruppo Telegram: https://t.me/dpenpodcast . Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dpenpodcast/ . Twitter: https://twitter.com/DpenPodcast . Disclaimer:Le informazioni fornite su Dpen Scienza sono di natura generale e a scopo puramente divulgativo, pertanto non possono sostituire in alcun caso il consiglio di un medico (ovvero un soggetto abilitato legalmente alla professione), o, nei casi specifici, di altri operatori sanitari (odontoiatri, infermieri, psicologi, farmacisti, veterinari, fisioterapisti, etc.).Le nozioni e le eventuali informazioni riguardanti procedure terapeutiche hanno fine unicamente illustrativo .Nessuno dei singoli autori o contributori di Dpen Scienza né altre parti connesse può esser ritenuto responsabile dei risultati o le conseguenze di un qualsiasi utilizzo o tentativo di utilizzo di una qualsiasi delle informazioni pubblicate.Nulla su Dpen Scienza può essere interpretato come un tentativo di offrire un'opinione medica o in altro modo coinvolta nella pratica della medicina.

beijinho folgadas e folgados. obrigado ao Luís, Tiago e Rui pelas perguntas. quem quiser participar e gravar comigo, que me manda mensagem. vamos trocar ideias e pensamentos.

Itt Varga Ferenc. Újabb gonzó podcasttal jelentkezem, ezúttal a Karlovy Vary-filmfesztiválról, ahol pompásan megfér egymás mellett az IQOS-helyszínes, Moët-fotófalos white party-s veretés, és a padlószönyegen fetrengve hardcore művészfilmekre tömegelős kultúrabefogadás - és nem egyszer ez a két világ keveredik is. Az első adásban Bujdosó Borival (vele csináltuk együtt az Origo Filmklubot 2005 és 2014 között) beszélgetünk arról, hogy miért különleges ez a fesztivál (ő már kilendcedik alkalommal jár itt, én csak most először), kitárgyaljuk a filmeket, amiket itt láttunk eddig, de dumálunk az HBO Max-botrányról, a magyar filmek aranykoráról, a sajátos mozizási szokásainkról, illetve arról, hogy mennyire para lehet most gyereket vállalni. Ha tetszett az adás, és megfordult a fejedben, hogy támogatnád a Filmklub podcastot, akkor ezt a Patreonon teheted meg, ahol beállíthatod, havonta mekkora összeggel szeretnéd segíteni a munkánkat. Kövesd be a Facebook-oldalunkat, és ne tartsd magadban a jó véleményedet: oszd meg, csillagozd fel és véleményezd a podcastot, ahol csak lehet! Köszönjük!

Iniziamo con tre storie di crimini e sorprese giudiziarie tra Stati Uniti, Francia e Italia, smontiamo una fake news russa sul bombardamento del centro commerciale di Kramenchuk in Ucraina (qui le prove: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/29/evidence-contradicts-russian-claims-about-kremenchuk-mall-attack ) , e parliamo di come hanno litigato Draghi e Conte ma dovrebbero essere ancora amichetti. Poi la Commissione Europea vuole bandire le Iqos aromatizzate, l'anno prossimo entrerà in vigore un visto per chi viene da fuori dentro l'Ue e Paltrinieri ha vinto l'oro nei 10km di fondo ai mondiali di nuoto (l'argento l'ha vinto Domenico Acerenza). Questo e altro nella puntata di oggi! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/vitamine-factanza/message

Saudações! Uma despedida… ou talvez não! Podcast que falei no episódio: instagram.com/zeeojantar

Para todos los que no pueden dejar de fumar, aquí les explicamos qué opciones alternativas al cigarro hay y cuál es la mejor para su salud.

Part 3 in a 4 part series on Kicking the Nicotine Habit, It's a Brain Thing. The MedEvidence doctors continue their discussion on smoking while diving into nicotine replacement therapies.Inside this episode:Nicotine Replacement TherapiesQuit smoking medicationsE-cigarettes & VapingIQOS - heated tobacco productsLinks to more information:A naturally-derived alternative treatment to quit smokingOngoing Research of Cytisinicline for Addiction More about Clinical Trial ParticipationAm I eligible to participate in this study?Why Should I participate in this study?What happens if I volunteer to participate in this study?Participate in Clinical Research This month Dr. Michael Koren and Michelle McCormick talk with Dr. Mitchell Rothstein a clinical Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine physician for 30 years in the Jacksonville Florida area.  Dr. Rothstein transitioned into Clinical Research as the Medical Director of the Phase 1 unit at Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research six years ago.Dr. Michael Koren, is a practicing cardiologist and CEO at ENCORE Research Group. He has been the principal investigator of 2000+ clinical trials while being published in the most prestigious medical journals. Dr. Koren received his medical degree cum laude at Harvard Medical School and completed his residency in internal medicine with a fellowship in cardiology at New York Hospital / Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center/ Cornell Medical Center.Rate, Review and Subscribe to the MedEvidence podcast to be notified when new episodes are released.Follow MedEvidence! on Social Media to discover the Truth Behind the Data.FacebookInstagramTwitterLinkedInPowered by ENCORE Research Group at www.ENCOREDOCS.comOriginal Air Date: April 13, 2022

"IQOS", le nouveau bébé de Philip Morris fait l'objet d'un matraquage marketing qui joue avec les frontières de l'illégal. Objectif : remplacer la cigarette classique en déclin, par un produit alternatif vedette, le tabac chauffé. Mais ce tabac chauffé est-il vraiment sans risque ? Et comment est rôdé le marketing de Philip Morris ? Dans Le Scan, le podcast actu de TelQuel, Landry Benoit reçoit Manal Zainabi et Leila Chick, co-auteurs avec Réda Dalil du dossier "IQOS : le grand enfumage". L'équipe "Le Scan" par TelQuel Média : Présentation, écriture, interview : Landry Benoit Montage, réalisation : Karim Sefiani Archives et sonores : Ibtissam Ouazzani Soutenez un média indépendant. Abonnez-vous à Telquel : https://telquel.ma/abonnement/

It s Friday. Figli, scuola compiti e tamponi…Adolescenti di oggi, abbandonati e fumatori di Iqos. Al telefono Dario Vergassola.

あけましておめでとう御座います。今年もヤマキをよろしくお願いします。初売りエピソード、増田がゲームやって弟に気使われる話、今度はレゲエでヤマキを潰しにくる地球さん、iQOSを吸う托鉢中の坊さんの話をしています。地球さん今年もラジオメールお待ちしてます、着いて行けるようヤマキ全員で頑張ります。

La activación de IQOS es una maravilla. Les decimos la razón. | ¿Adiós a los influencers? ¿O regresan más fuertes? | Un chatbot es esencial para tu negocio | PYMES ¿Cómo deben actuar en su estrategia de marketing el 2022? | ¿Qué es la Slow Fashion?

Estamos de volta para a terceira temporada do PneumoCast e já com o tema mais em alta na esfera da Pneumologia! Conversaremos sobre os DEFs e tudo o que temos de evidência até o momento, mas de maneira concisa. Caso sinta a necessidade de aprofundarmos em algum tema, me mande mensagem!! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/pneumocast/message

This is "The Leading Voices in Food" podcast but today we're speaking with a leading voice in tobacco control. "How come," you might ask, "why?" So I believe for many years that the parallels between the tobacco industry and food industry practices are nothing short of stunning, and that our field would do very well to learn lessons learned from the pioneers in the tobacco wars. Our guest today is Dr. Kenneth Warner, Distinguished Emeritus Professor and former Dean of the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan. Ken's research focuses on the economic and policy aspects of tobacco and health. Interview Summary   So Ken, you and I have a long history, and I thought it might be instructive to mention just a little bit of it because you really helped shape some of the ways I think about addressing food policy. So I first became familiar with your work long before I met you in person, when I was teaching classes at Yale. I was assigning papers you wrote on tobacco control and I was especially interested in work that you'd done on tobacco taxes. It really gave me the idea of pushing ahead with food-related taxes. Then finally I got a chance to meet you in person at a meeting that was hosted by the first President George Bush in Kennebunkport, Maine, on cancer control. You and I got to talking about similarities between the tobacco industry behavior and the way the food industry was behaving. We were both struck by the similarities. That led us to write a paper together that was published in 2009 in "The Milbank Quarterly." And I have to say, of all the papers I've published over my career, this was one of my favorites because I really enjoyed working with you. I learned a ton from it, and it really, I thought, made some very important points. And I'd just like to mention the title of that paper because it pretty much summarizes what it found. So the title was, "The Perils of Ignoring History: Big Tobacco Played Dirty and Millions Died. How Similar Is Big Food?" In my mind, the playbooks are still very similar, and that's why it's really interesting to talk to you today, get a little sense of what's happening more recently, and importantly, think about what lessons are learned from tobacco control. I wanted to bring up one thing from that paper that I always found fascinating, which was the discussion about something called "The Frank Statement to Cigarette Smokers." Could you describe what that was and what role you think it played in history?   Sure. Just to give you some context for it, the first two major papers that implicated smoking in lung cancer were published in major medical journals in 1950. In December of 1952 there was an article in the "Reader's Digest," which incidentally was the only major magazine that did not accept cigarette advertising, that was entitled, "Cancer by the Carton." And this was the American public's first real exposure to the risks associated with smoking, and it led to a two-year decline in cigarette smoking, a very sharp decline, something that was unprecedented in the history of the cigarette. Following that there was some research published on mice and cancer. And needless to say, the tobacco industry was getting pretty nervous about this. So the executives of all the major tobacco firms met in New York City in December of 1953, and they collaborated on what became a public relations strategy, which drove their behavior for many years thereafter. The first thing they did was to publish "A Frank Statement to Cigarette Smokers" in January of 1954. This "Frank Statement" was published in over 400 magazines and newspapers, and it reached an estimated audience of some 80 million Americans, which would be a very good percentage of all Americans in those years. And they talked about the fact that there was this evidence out there, but they said, "We feel it is in the public interest," this is a quote, "to call attention to the fact that eminent doctors and research scientists have publicly questioned the claimed significance of this research." Then they went on to say, and I quote again, "We accept an interest in people's health as a basic responsibility, paramount to every other consideration in our business. We believe the products we make are not injurious to health and," and this is the kicker, "we always have and always will cooperate closely with those whose task it is to safeguard the public health," end quote. They went on to say that they would support research on smoking and health, and, of course, that they would always be the good guys in this story. This was designed as part of a strategy to obfuscate, to deceive the public, basically, to lie about what they already knew about the health hazards associated with smoking. And it was essentially a first very public step in a campaign that, one could argue, in many ways has persisted ever since, although, obviously, now the tobacco companies admit that they're killing their customers and they admit that smoking causes cancer and heart disease and lung disease and so on. But that was kind of the beginning of the strategy that drove their behavior for decades.   You know, that was one of the issues we raised in our paper. How similar were the big food companies in talking about concern for the health of their customers, planting doubt with the science, pledging to make changes that were in the interest of public health, agreeing to collaborate with public health officials? All those things played out in the food arena as well. And that's just one of many places where the food industry behave very, very similar to what the tobacco industry has done. But boy, is it interesting to hear that particular anecdote and to learn of the cynical behavior of the industry. So fast forward from there, and you think about the tobacco industry executives testifying before Congress that nicotine wasn't addictive, and you have that same process playing out many years later. These similarities are really remarkable.   So let's talk about your work and some of the issues that I think apply to the food area, and let's talk about taxes at the beginning. So I worked for years on the issue of soda taxes, and these taxes now exist in more than 50 countries around the world and in a number of major cities in the US, including San Francisco, Philadelphia, Seattle, and Oakland. And these taxes have been shown to have really positive effects, and they seem to be growing around the world. And I'd like to understand what you see as the overall findings from the work on tobacco taxes. But before we do that, you have a very interesting story to tell about how the tobacco control community responded when you first began speaking about taxes. It turns out to be taxes on tobacco have had whopping effects. But what was the initial reaction to people in that field?   Yeah, it is kind of an interesting story. So around 1980, when I first started writing and talking about tobacco taxation as a method of reducing smoking, I used to have public health audiences booing me. If they had rotten tomatoes with them, they would have been throwing them.   You know, Ken, it's hard to imagine because now these taxes are completely routine and accepted.   Yes, they're not only routine and accepted, they are a first principle of tobacco control. They are enshrined in the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. So they really are kind of the first thing we turn to because we know that they work. We know that they reduce smoking.   But let me give you a story about how I learned that this is not only a phenomenon with people smoking. It's a phenomenon with people using all other drugs, and it turns out it's a trans-species law, the Law of Demand. And that law says, basically, that if you increase price, the demand for the commodity will decrease. Well, in the beginning, the public health audiences believed two things. They believed that smokers were so addicted that they would not be affected by price, so it was ridiculous to even think about it. And they said, you have to have intrinsic motivators to get people to quit smoking. They have to care about their kids. They want to see their kids grow up, their spouses, and so on, and not extrinsic forces like a tax. So those were their two objections. So the story that I think is really kind of fun. I was on a plane flying to a small conference in Kansas City. This is sometime in the early '80s. And I happened to be seated next to Jack Henningfield, who is probably the preeminent psychopharmacologist dealing with nicotine, maybe in the world. And we were talking about price response, the fact that cigarette taxes work. And he said, "You know, I've got something I want to show you here." And he pulled out some what are called response cost curves from the psychology literature. And this is where you take a laboratory animal, in this instance addicted to narcotics or other addictive substances, and you give them a challenge to get their drugs. So first, I should note that these animals are so addicted that if they're given the choice between food and their drug, they will choose their drug, and they will in fact end up dying because they place a preference for the drug over food. But it turns out that when you increase the price of the drug to them, they decrease the amount that they consume. So what do I mean by that? If they have to push a lever, a bar, a certain number of times to get a dose of their drug, and you raise the number of bar pushes per dose, they will dose themselves with fewer doses. I took a look at these curves, and basically, a response cost curve for these lab animals is essentially a demand curve as we economists see it. And I calculated the price elasticity of demand, which is our standard measure of the responsiveness to price. And it turns out that addicted laboratory rats have essentially the same price elasticity of demand, the same price responsiveness that human beings do to cigarettes.   That's an absolutely fascinating story. And, you know, I know Jack, and have admired his work, as you have, and it's amazing to think about that conversation on a plane, and what sort of scientific work it led to, and how that, in turn, found its way into policies that exist around the world. So tell us then about tobacco taxes, and how high do they have to be in order to affect consumption in an appreciable way, and have they worked in reducing tobacco use, and what's your overall take on that?   So we have, quite literally, hundreds of studies in countries around the world, and we know a lot but we don't know everything. So we don't know, for example, if there's a particular price above which, you know, nobody will use the product. We don't have even really good data suggesting of, you know, what's the minimum increase in price that you have to have to have a noticeable impact. Overall, the literature suggests that if you increase the price of cigarettes by 10%, you will decrease the quantity demanded by 3 to 4%. Now, what this means is that roughly half of that decreased demand reflects decreases in the number of cigarettes that continuing smokers use, while the other half represents decreases in smoking, people quitting or kids not starting. So the demand is what we call price inelastic. The price change itself is larger, proportionately, than the decrease in consumption. But that decrease in consumption is still substantial and it's enough to have a large impact.   Now, cigarette prices vary all over the world, and cigarette prices vary primarily because of taxation differences. So if you go to the Scandinavian countries, you'll find that a pack of cigarettes will run $15 or more. If you go to Australia, you're looking at $30 or more a pack. In the US, currently, we're looking at an average price in the range of about 7 to $8. In some jurisdictions, like New York City, it's $10 or more. But the prices in the US are actually relatively low among the more developed nations in the world. Any tax increase will have an impact but obviously the larger tax increases will have larger impacts. And there's some good and bad news in tobacco taxation, particularly in a country like ours, and this is, again, true for most of the developed world. Smoking is now concentrated in marginalized populations. I'm talking about low socioeconomic groups, the LGBTQ community, and racial minorities, in particular. If you think of this as an economic phenomenon, when you raise the price on cigarettes, you're going to hit the worst-off economically segments of the population hard. That's the bad news. The good news is that those people, precisely because they are poor, tend to be much more price responsive than high-income smokers, and more of them will quit. So we have this problem that the tax is regressive, it imposes a larger burden on the poor, but the health effect is progressive. It will reduce the gap between the rich and poor in terms of smoking rates. And of great importance, there's an enormous gap between the rich and poor in this country in life expectancy, and as much as half of that may be differences in smoking rates.   Ken, there's a hundred follow-up questions I could ask, and I find this discussion absolutely fascinating. One thing that came into my mind was that some years ago I looked at the relationship of taxes, state by state in the US, and rates of disease like lung cancer and heart disease. And there was plenty of data because there was a huge range in tobacco taxes. Places like New York and Rhode Island had very high taxes, and the tobacco Southern states, like North Carolina, had very low taxes. But what's the sort of recent take on that, and the relationship between taxes and actual disease?   Well, it's still true. And there are, in fact, what you suggest, the southeastern block of tobacco states have unusually low rates of taxation. And I haven't seen any recent data but one presumes that they are suffering more from smoking-related diseases because their smoking rates are higher. I mean, that has to be true. So I don't know that we have any particularly good data recently, but there have been studies that clearly relate tobacco or cigarette prices to health outcomes associated with smoking.   I'm assuming US scientists have played a prominent role in producing the literature showing the negative health consequences of using cigarettes, and yet you said the United States has relatively low taxes compared to other developed countries. Why, do you think?   I think we're going to get into a very philosophical discussion about the US right here. It has to do with individual responsibility. We know for sure that the initial reason the taxes were so low was that the tobacco block was so influential in the Senate, particularly in the days when Jesse Helms, the senator from North Carolina, was in the Senate. He was the most feared senator by the other senators, and if you wanted to get anything done for your cause, you had to go along with his cause, which was keeping cigarette prices low and doing everything they could to support smoking. So there's clearly been a built-in bias in the Senate, and basically in the Congress as a whole, against tobacco policy. You see a huge variation from state to state in tobacco policies, and it's reflective of basically their political leanings in general.   You brought up this issue of personal responsibility, and boy, does that apply in the food area. You know, the food companies are saying: if you have one sugar beverage every once in a while, it's not going to be harmful. And it's not use of the products but it is overuse of the products. Thereby saying, it's not corporate responsibility we're talking about here, it's personal responsibility. That same argument was made by the tobacco industry, wasn't it?   It was. They would be less inclined to do that today, for a couple of reasons. One is that we know that even low levels of smoking are harmful and indeed cause many of the diseases that we were referring to earlier. And I think all the companies have now admitted publicly that smoking does cause all of these diseases that we've long known it causes. And all of them are claiming that they would like to move away from a society with smoking to one that has alternative products that would give people choices and ways to get their nicotine without exposing themselves to so much risk. I mean, we have to remember, the fact that cigarettes kill their consumers is a real drawback as far as the industry is concerned because they're losing a lot of their consumers, you know, 10, 20 years before they normally would, and they have to deal with all these lawsuits. So it's unfortunate for them. Having said that, cigarettes are the goose that lays the golden egg. They cost very little to manufacture. The industry is sufficiently oligopolistic that the profits are enormous, and their profitability has continued even while smoking has dropped rather precipitously ever since the mid-1960s.   Is that because the markets outside the US have been growing?   They certainly have helped. Although now, and this is only true within the last few years, the aggregate cigarette sales in the world are declining. They've actually started dropping. So we were seeing a relatively stable situation as smoking decreased in the developed world and was rising in the developing world. The only place now where we're seeing increases in smoking are areas in Africa, which, by the way, is the one place in the world where we might be able to forego the tobacco epidemic because smoking rates are still quite low in most of the countries, not all of them, and also parts of the Middle East. But elsewhere we've been seeing smoking declining all over the world. That doesn't mean the profits have to drop because one thing that the companies can do, is, they can raise their prices. Now, if prices go up because of taxes that hurts the companies. But if they raise their own prices because demand is inelastic, what that means is that the percentage increase in the price is larger than the percentage decline in the demand for cigarettes. So they're actually adding to their profitability by doing that. They've always played this very interesting game for years of keeping price below what we would think to be the profit-maximizing price. And I think the reason for that has to do with addiction because they know that they have to have what are called replacement smokers, kids coming in to take the place of the smokers who are dying or quitting. And for years, I think, they kept their prices down because they didn't want to discourage young people from smoking. Now, I think they see the writing on the wall. Smoking is declining very rapidly. Smoking prevalence, which was 45% in the mid, early-1960s, is now a little over 12% in the US, and I think they're raising their prices with the understanding that they want to take as much advantage of the opportunity with the addicted smokers, the adults, as they possibly can, even though smoking among kids is becoming vanishingly small.   I think of so many parallels with the soda taxes that now exists in a number of places, and the companies have responded somewhat differently. And perhaps it's the level of addiction issue that kicks in here, and the need to have replacement customers. Maybe that's another key difference. But with the soda taxes, the companies have not increased prices beyond the level of the tax. You know, to delight of public health experts, the companies have tended to pass along the entire tax so the companies are not eating that difference in order to keep prices the same. Higher tax gets reflected in the ultimate price that they charge, but they're not increasing prices beyond that. Do you think it might be the addiction issue that's different here?   I don't know. I mean, that certainly could be an element of it. The other thing is that they're manufacturing other drinks that are being used in place of some of the sodas. So they've got waters, they've got juices. I mean, obviously these sugary juices are no better, but they do make other products. They make the diet drinks. And to the extent that they can find substitutes for those products within their own companies, it may be that they're content to allow people to make those substitutions.   Interesting comment. The results so far on the soda tax suggest that the most common substitution as people drink less soda, is water, which is of course better than a lot of the alternatives that people might be consuming, so that's a bit of really good news. Even though the companies do sell water, Coke and Pepsi have Aquafina and Dasani, for example, they face a basic problem. Number one is that these companies are the biggest sellers of sugary beverages but not bottled water. That happens to be Nestle. So if people migrate to bottled water, they're likely to migrate from the big companies, like Coke and Pepsi, to Nestle. Also, people tend not to be very brand-loyal to water. They tend to buy whatever is on sale or whatever they find available to them, and that creates a problem for these companies like Coke and Pepsi that do rely on brand loyalty for their marketing. So it's very interesting. And also, I wonder, based on the research on food and addiction, if the companies don't take a hit if people switch from full sugar beverages even to diet beverages that they might sell because there wouldn't be as much addictive potential, and therefore the customers wouldn't have to have as much just to keep the habit going. So it's really interesting to think this through.   That's certainly very plausible. The whole thing would also depend on the price elasticity of demand for sodas, and specifically for the brands that they're concerned about. If there is greater elasticity there than what we observe for cigarettes, then raising those prices aren't necessarily going to help them all that much.   You mentioned that the elasticity estimates for tobacco suggested that a 10% increase in price led to a 3 to 4% reduction in consumption, and the numbers are even more positive in the case of the sugar beverages, where if you get a 10%, 15% increase in price, you end up with 10, 15% reduction in consumption. So that's good news in the food arena.   That's good news but it also means that they can't do as easily what the tobacco industry can do, which is to raise their prices and expect to see profits rise. Because if they're losing as much in sales as they're gaining in price, it's no win.   So Ken, let's talk about product formulation because you mentioned that earlier, and this is a really interesting issue that, again, connects tobacco and food products. So you think about the tobacco companies mainly selling cigarettes, but now there's vaping, there's cigarettes with things like menthol and other flavors, or low-fat foods, or artificial sweeteners. The list of product reformulations in order to attract customers goes on and on and on. So I know a controversial topic in your field has been e-cigarettes. Can you explain what these are?   E-cigarettes have been around now for about a decade, let's say. Basically, they're devices that allow people to inhale nicotine and other substances, but the purpose is to give them their nicotine without combustion. And we know that the major problem associated with smoking is the products of combustion. There's 7,000 chemical compounds in cigarette smoke. 70 of them are known human carcinogens, causes of cancer in humans. Many of them are cardiotoxic. They cause lung disease and so on. The e-cigarettes have about two orders of magnitude fewer toxins in their emissions than do cigarettes. And it turns out that the amount of the comparable toxins, when they are in fact comparable, that you find in the e-cigarette emissions is much lower, usually a 10th to a 400th, of what you find in cigarette smoke.   So logically, and based on a fair body of evidence at this point, vaping, use of e-cigarettes to get nicotine, is substantially less dangerous than is cigarette smoking. However, the controversy here is incredible. This is the most divisive issue that I have witnessed in my 45 years of working in the tobacco control field. It has torn the field asunder. The mainstream of public health, and by that I'm including governmental agencies, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, the Truth Initiative, the American Cancer Society, heart and lung associations, all of mainstream public health is strongly opposed to e-cigarettes, and for one reason. They're concerned about kids' uptake of e-cigarettes, which has been substantial. It's been decreasing the last couple of years, but it has been substantial. And there are a number of things they're concerned about in that regard, and they're completely ignoring the fact that there's pretty good evidence that e-cigarettes are increasing smoking cessation for a subset of smokers. And a number of us on the science side of this, believe that the net effect of e-cigarettes is beneficial, that it's actually, possibly, a tool to add to the armamentarium of things like cigarette taxation, like smoke-free workplaces, like restrictions on advertising, and that it will help a group of inveterate smokers, those who either can't quit nicotine or don't want to, to move to a less dangerous alternative to smoking. I am not saying that e-cigarettes have no risk associated with them. They almost certainly do. But it is substantially lower.   Now, historically, this is divisive within the field in part because all of the earlier attempts at, quote-unquote, tobacco harm reduction have been produced by the major cigarette companies, and they've been fraudulent. So cigarette filters were manufactured and sold, starting in the 1950s, in response to the scare that I referred to earlier about cancer. And they were sold with a message that the filters block the dangerous stuff but let the flavor through. And people bought this. That decrease in smoking in the early 1950s reversed, smoking went up sharply, as sales of filtered cigarettes went up. By the way, the first successful filtered cigarette was Kent, and it used what it referred to as the miracle Micronite filter. Well, that miracle Micronite filter turns out to have been made of asbestos. And there are lawsuits continuing to the present day by workers in the factories that made the filter tips for Kent cigarettes, who themselves ended up with lung cancer or other diseases due to the asbestos. Then came low-tar and nicotine cigarettes, and we actually have ample evidence from the documents that had been revealed by lawsuits, that the industry knew that this was a public relations device. It was not a harm reduction device. And in fact, because people believed that low-tar and nicotine cigarettes were less dangerous, it's likely that it actually increased the toll of smoking because people who would have quit, switched to low-tar and nicotine cigarettes instead. So there's some pretty awful history here that makes people legitimately concerned about alternative products. A critical element of this story is that the alternative products, in this case, the e-cigarettes were introduced by non-cigarette, non-tobacco companies, and their goal was to replace smoking. Now the major companies are all making their own e-cigarettes as well because they have to do it from a defensive point of view, but basically they don't have any great interest in slowing up the sale of cigarettes. They want to benefit from that as long as they can.   So I should know the answer to this but I don't, but are e-cigarettes taxed? And wouldn't it be optimal to tax e-cigarettes but less than regular cigarettes so you discourage use of both but discourage the use of regular cigarettes more?   That is very insightful. Two colleagues and I actually published a paper saying that in 2015 in "The New England Journal of Medicine," that we should be taxing e-cigarettes modestly, the reason being that we want to discourage kids from using them, and kids are far more price-sensitive than our adults. Kids have a very elastic response to cigarette prices. Adults do not, and in particular, older adults have even lower price responsiveness. So yes, there should be some taxation of e-cigarettes to discourage youth use of it but that taxation should be dramatically lower than the taxation of cigarettes. Some states are now taxing e-cigarettes. Not all of them. The federal government is actually looking into a proposal to double the tax, the federal tax, on cigarettes, which would take it up to $2.01 a pack, and at the same time, to establish an equivalent tax, similar to the $2 tax, on all vaping products. This would be a disaster because it would definitely discourage kids from vaping, but it would also discourage adults from using e-cigarettes as an alternative to smoking, and the most addicted, the inveterate smokers, those are the ones that need these alternatives. So that's a bad policy proposal. A much better one would be to increase the cigarette tax by more than a dollar, raise it to 3 or $4 or something, and impose a modest tax on e-cigarettes. This would discourage people from smoking, both adults and kids, but especially kids. It would discourage kids from using e-cigarettes but it would create a price differential that would encourage the inveterate smokers to switch to e-cigarettes. Now, part of the problem, and this has gotten worse over time, is that the American public believes that e-cigarettes, that vaping, is as dangerous and even maybe more dangerous than cigarette smoking. Nothing could be further from the truth but so far the mainstream of public health has sold that message to the public, and the public, including smokers, believe it.   That's a fascinating story about how the public health field might be getting in its own way with this.   And maybe doing damage to public health.   So let's loop back a little bit to the behavior of the tobacco industry. So in 2017, the Phillip Morris Company funded and launched an organization called Foundation for a Smoke-Free World. So I think, hmm, a tobacco company saying they want less smoking, and one could view this with pretty high cynicism but what do you think about it?   I've always shared your sense of cynicism about it. There's an interesting anecdote related to this. The individual who negotiated the deal by which Phillip Morris offered $1 billion over a 12-year period to establish this foundation, that individual was the main actor in the World Health Organization during the development of the global treaty on tobacco control, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. He also became director of the organization and served in that capacity until just the other day. He has stepped down from being director. But let me give you a little context for it. Philip Morris International that needs to be distinguished from Altria and Philip Morris Domestic, but Philip Morris International sells the leading brand of what is known as heated tobacco products, HTPs. These are products that actually have tobacco in them. E-cigarettes have no tobacco in them but these products actually have tobacco in them. But instead of burning the tobacco, they heat it. They volatilize it, and the nicotine is inhaled. Like e-cigarettes, they appear to be substantially less dangerous than smoking, although it's not clear that they're as less dangerous as, than, e-cigarettes. But they're produced only by the major cigarette companies. Philip Morris is now selling these products successfully in many countries, many cities around the world. While they actually have the authorization to sell an older version of the product in the US, it's not very popular at this point. But in Japan, over the last four years there's been a drop in cigarettes sold of about a third at the same time that there's been this great increase in the use of these heated tobacco products manufactured by Philip Morris International and by Japan Tobacco. They have a product called Ploom. Philip Morris' product is called IQOS, I-Q-O-S, which, I was told, originally stood for I Quit Ordinary Smoking. So they are the leader of the theme song that the industry is singing these days about how they want a smoke-free world and they want to move toward one. But the only way they're ever going to do that, willingly, is if they can sell other products like these heated tobacco products and make large sums of money on them. Philip Morris has a good start at that. They claim that about a third of their revenue now is coming from IQOS, this heated tobacco product.   So whether that foundation ultimately has beneficial effects or not, forget corporate beneficial effects but on the public good, would pretty much depend on who's choosing to use these e-cigarettes, I'm imagining. That if it's people switching from normal cigarettes to them, or using them instead of normal cigarettes, it's one thing. But if they're recruiting new people who otherwise wouldn't smoke, then it would be a bad thing. So how do you think that'll all play out?   That's actually a critically important question, Kelly. And one of the great concerns that the opposition to e-cigarettes has, is that they're addicting lots of kids to nicotine, and that many of them will go on to smoke, and that that will reverse the progress that we made on smoking. Now, it turns out that there is no evidence to support the latter contention. And in fact, there's evidence to the contrary. I think it's entirely possible that some kids who would not have touched a cigarette otherwise are vaping and then trying cigarettes in the future. Whether they become regular smokers, remains to be seen. But I think there certainly are some kids like that. But what we do know is that the rate of smoking among kids, what we call current smoking, and smoking among kids means that they've had at least one puff on a cigarette in the last 30 days, that number has plummeted over the last quarter century, and, and this is the interesting thing, it has gone down at its fastest rate precisely during the period in which vaping has been popular among kids.   So one theory is that vaping is displacing smoking to some extent. That kids who would've smoked are vaping instead. It's a very complicated area and we don't know the answer. Among adults who vape, and they are relatively few in number except for very young adults, we observe mostly dual use, but the question is how much of this is a transition to vaping only, and then, maybe, a transition to nothing after that. In the UK, where vaping has been advertised by the health organizations as a way to quit smoking, and they have encouraged its use, and they use it in their smoking cessation clinics, and you'll even find it in hospitals, in the UK we have seen that more than half of the people who have quit smoking by using e-cigarettes have also quit vaping. So it is no longer the case in the UK that a majority of the people who vape are also currently smoking.   In the US, the data have been moving in that direction but it's still a majority who are dual users rather than vaping only. But we have evidence of four or five completely different kinds of studies, commercial data, other products in other countries, that all lead to the conclusion that vaping is already increasing the rate of smoking cessation in the US and in the UK by probably 10 to 15%. That's a hard thing to see in the data but it is something that, if you dig into the data, you will see it, and as I say, we see it all over the place. Let me give you one example of the tobacco harm reduction story that's fabulous. 40 to 50 years ago, large numbers of Swedish males started using a smokeless tobacco product called snus, S-N-U-S. It's a relatively low nitrosamine product, nitrosamine being a carcinogenic element, and they substituted it for cigarettes largely because cigarette taxes were going way up and there weren't any significant taxes on snus. So what you observe today, some three, four decades or more later, is that Swedish males have the lowest male smoking rate of any country in Europe, and maybe in the world. They do not have a low tobacco use rate. Their tobacco use rate is pretty typical but it consists mostly of snus. And they also have by far the lowest rate of tobacco-related diseases, like lung cancer, of men in all of the European Union countries, and the second lowest is typically a rate twice or more that of what you see in the Swedish males. Swedish females, who did not quit smoking in large numbers and did not take up snus until fairly recently, have rates of lung cancer and other diseases that are average or above-average for the European Union. So that's a great example of tobacco harm reduction in action, and it's one that's been around now, as I say, for decades.   Ken, this is a remarkable history and you're just bringing it alive beautifully. But let me ask you one final question. So given that you've been working in this field for more than four decades now, and have really been a pioneer, a leader, a warrior, and a hero, all those things could be applied to you and your work, if I asked you to sum up what's been learned from all these decades of work on tobacco, what would you say?   There are a lot of lesson. Certainly, we have learned specific kinds of interventions that really matter. You and I spoke about tax at some length. That's the preeminent one. Smoke-free workplaces, including smoke-free restaurants and bars, have not only themselves had a direct impact on health but have also set the tone for a more smoke-free society. So we have seen quite dramatic changes. I mentioned we're going from a 45% rate of smoking for the nation as a whole down to a little over 12%. That, however, has taken us six to seven decades. So it's kind of a good news, bad news story. It's a very complicated area. Tobacco control was ranked by CDC as one of the 10 most important public health measures of the 20th century, and also the first decade of the 21st century. And I think that's completely legitimate, and it is something about which all of us who care about public health can feel very proud about. The problem still remains. It is an enormous problem, as you alluded earlier, in many parts of the developing world, the low- and middle-income countries, and it's a growing problem in some of those countries, and it's just not going to disappear real fast. The lesson that I've taken most recently has been a discouraging one, and that's how divisive our field has become. We really have a chasm between the people who are opposed to tobacco harm reduction and those who are supportive of it. They're good people on both sides, they believe what they're saying, but they can't talk to each other civilly at this point. I hope that that will not become the case for those of you who are fighting the good fight in dealing with unhealthy foods.   Bio   Kenneth E. Warner is the Avedis Donabedian Distinguished University Professor Emeritus of Public Health and Dean Emeritus at the University of Michigan School of Public Health. A member of the faculty from 1972-2017, he served as Dean from 2005-2010. Presented in over 275 professional publications, Dr. Warner's research has focused on economic and policy aspects of tobacco and health. Dr. Warner served as the World Bank's representative to negotiations on the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, WHO's first global health treaty. He also served as the Senior Scientific Editor of the 25th anniversary Surgeon General's report on smoking and health. From 2004-2005 he was President of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). He currently serves on the FDA's Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee. In 1996 Dr. Warner was elected to the National Academy of Medicine. He is a recipient of the Surgeon General's Medallion, the Luther Terry Award for Exemplary Achievement in Tobacco Control, and the Doll-Wynder Award from SRNT. Dr. Warner earned his AB from Dartmouth College and MPhil and PhD in economics from Yale University.  

I dette afsnit af Regelstaten taler vi om det, der meget vel kan være den mest regulerede produktgruppe i Danmark overhovedet. Det er en produktgruppe, butikkerne ikke må vise frem. Det er en produktgruppe, butikkerne ikke må oplyse prisen på. Det er en produktgruppe, hvor producenterne ikke selv må bestemme antallet i pakkerne. Det er en produktgruppe, hvor producenterne ikke selv må bestemme udseendet på pakkerne. Men du kan dog købe produkterne i butikkerne. Du behøver ikke opsøge banderne, for at få det.  Produktet det er tobaksvarer og til dels nikotinprodukter. Og til at hjælpe os med at forstå den omfattende regulering har Regelstaten i dag besøg af Christopher Arzrouni fra Philip Morris  ”Reklameforbud lader eksisterende rygere i stikken”: https://cepos.dk/artikler/regelstatens-reklameforbud-lader-eksisterende-rygere-i-stikken/ (https://cepos.dk/artikler/regelstatens-reklameforbud-lader-eksisterende-rygere-i-stikken/)   Link til IQOS (opvarmet tobak): https://www.pmi.com/smoke-free-products/iqos-our-tobacco-heating-system   Optagelsen er lavet 11. november 2022. 

The 174-year-old tobacco company spent much of its life blowing a cloud of deceit around the deadly effects of its signature product. Now eager for a do-over, PMI's highly advertised “Unsmoke the World” initiative seems strangely noble, until you start asking questions.* FULL TRANSCRIPT *TEDDY ROOSEVELT: Surely there never was a fight better worth making than the one which we are in.BOB GARFIELD: Welcome to Bully Pulpit. That was Teddy Roosevelt, I'm Bob Garfield. This is episode five: Where There's No Smoke, There's Fire.It's been a hot and violent and infectious and altogether unsettling summer, in the midst of which — in the New York Times and all over the internet — emerged this: Philip-Morris International CEO Yatzick Olczak in an ad campaign speaking about the dangers of cigarettes.OLCZAK: The science exists today and there is no time to spare to solve the problem of smoking.The problem of smoking? From the maker of Marlboro's? There's an attention getter. A bona fide Merchant of Death vowing to phase out cigarettes in favor of so-called smoke-free products, like his company's non-combustible IQOS.TUTORIAL: Say hello to new IQOS heat control technology. Using it couldn't be easier. Remove the IQOS holder from the pocket charger, insert the tobacco stick tobacco side down in the holder and up to the silver line. Turn on, and when the LED turns solid green you can start to experience the true taste of real tobacco by heating, not burning it.The goal, Philip Morris says, is for smoke-free products to represent half of the company's revenue within four years. “Unsmoke the world,” is the slogan.OLCZAK: The prime cause of harm generated by the smoking is an outcome of the combustion. Okay? When you burn the cigarette, when you burn the tobacco you release the thousands of the chemicals. Many of those chemicals, they are very bad for the human body.Olczak says this as if it's a fresh revelation, but it's still jarring to hear Phillip Morris, of all institutions, speak of smoking as a scourge. And to bet the corporate future on a gizmo that aims to obsolete its core product. Listen to the man's frustration that there are skeptics who are not immediately accepting IQOS as a triumph of science and technology.OLCZAK: I do recognize that there is still a group of people who don't believe us. That's fine. So, it's perfectly okay to disagree with us, but it is not perfectly okay to deprive yourself from the ability to have a dialogue with us, to listen, to have a conversation, to read our science. We know that our vision is right, because of the impact PMI has on the society to solve the problem of smoking and the faster we recognize this whole thing and start working on a strategy, the better we all together will be.Oh, OK, now he's playing more to type — informing us that it is unacceptable to ignore Big Tobacco on the question of reducing tobacco's harm. Oh, is it now? Those of us of a certain age can vaguely remember — whaddayacallit? —  the 20th century, during the entirety of which Big Tobacco denied, for example, any link to cancer.REP. WAXMAN: In a deposition last year, you were asked whether cigarette smoking causes cancer. Your answer was, quote, “I don't believe so.” Do you stand by that answer today?TISCH: I do, sir.REP. WAXMAN: Do you understand how isolated you are in that belief from the entire scientific community?TISCH: I do, sir.That was from a 1994 hearing of the House Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, in which Congressman Henry Waxman famously confronted Lorillard CEO Andrew Tisch and six other tobacco bosses. But “isolated” wasn't the half of it. For decades, the industry denied links to heart and lung disease, denied the addictiveness of nicotine, denied chemically augmenting nicotine's effects, denied marketing to children — all the while actively undercutting scientific findings, actively producing junk science, falsely claiming filtered and so-called “light” cigarettes were safer and propping up a variety of sciency-sounding front groups — such as the Council for Tobacco Research — that seemed all distinguished and s**t but existed only to obscure the deadly truth about smoking. Which is why, by the way, when Philip Morris noisily pledged $80 million to help underwrite The Foundation for a Smoke Free World, both the World Health Organization and the UN General Assembly cited conflict of interest in telling Big Tobacco to butt out.Nonetheless, the promise of getting the deadly smoke out of smoking has captured many an imagination, including Wall Street's, which has rewarded Phillip Morris and other tobacco makers with bigger share prices and rosy outlooks from stock pickers. Because, the thinking goes, while it's counterintuitive to steer into a skid, that's the way to regain traction.PUNDIT: This is all kind of part of Philip Morris's general rebranding away from smoking products and cigarettes. And they're really seeing the writing on the wall here as cigarette sales in higher income countries continue to dwindle and they're coming under increasing pressure from many governments to curtail their cigarette sales. It's really become in their best interest to kind of make this general shift away from cigarettes and nicotine.That's from Britain's I24 business news. Lo and behold, analysts from Chase, Stiffel Nicklaus, UBS, JP Morgan, Morningstar Research and stock-predictor engine Trefis, have rated Philip Morris International a buy. At about 100 bucks a share, it's price has grown more than 40% in the past 10 months.Of course, while stock prices are historically a highly reliable measure of public sentiment, one thing the free market is notoriously free of is conscience. As a universe, investors are concerned with ongoing earnings growth and nothing else, which is why, as the planet burns to a cinder, Exxon Mobil's share price has doubled in the past year. What's surprising about the smoke-free strategy is that it also has been embraced by a significant cohort of the public health community. This is an excerpt of a video from Public Health England, in which doctors Lion Shahab and Rosemary Leonard show a dramatic experiment comparing the output of burning tobacco versus the nearly pristine vapor from smokeless cigarettes.SHAHAB: My research shows that e-cigarettes are significantly less harmful than cigarettes. A big reason why is the tar, which you can see here, which is not produced by e-cigarettes but produced by cigarettes. The impact of using e-cigarettes in the long-term is very similar to using licensed nicotine products such as nicotine patches or nicotine gum, as you can see here when you compare the control jar with the vapor jar.LEONARD: So, this experiment shows that every cigarette you smoke causes tar to enter your body and it's the tar that contains the poisonous chemicals that spread through the bloodstream.SHAHAB: Which are linked to diseases such as heart disease, stroke and cancer.That's one view. There is also an opposite one, as voiced by Dr. Vinayak Prasad, head of the World Health Organization's tobacco control division.PRASAD: Switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes is not quitting, number one. Number two, we don't see the smokers switch to e-cigarettes 100 percent. The dual use is again very harmful. What we are also seeing is that more and more younger people are taking to e-cigarettes and then later progressing to tobacco.As for Philip Morris, he told the UK's Bureau of Investigative Journalism, quote:If they really want to be a part of the solution, they should go tobacco-free, not smoke-free. If they are genuine about a tobacco-free society, they will readily embrace anything to reduce the demand for all forms of tobacco products.Anything else, he says, is a “criminal act and a human rights violation.”In other words, within the tobacco-control universe, a schism — a polarizing debate hinging on the lesser of two evils. Ruth E. Malone is a professor of social and behavioral sciences at the University of California, San Francisco, and editor of the journal Tobacco Control.MALONE: We are adding all these new additional products and we are still sorting out what the overall public health impact of that is going to be. So is the impact going to be that, as some people say, it definitely is helpful for them in getting off cigarettes, but others revert back to smoking cigarettes and you just have a larger market of people using tobacco and nicotine products rather than actually reducing the damage from those products.The Public Health England tar experiment would seem to be a vivid and maybe even mic-drop argument for society gratefully accepting smoke-free technology. But to Malone, the whole schism-framing may itself be problematic. She worries that viewing the debate on stark, binary terms obscures a less obvious and highly dangerous element of Big Tobacco's strategy — namely, as Philip Morris's Olzcak insisted — claiming that its expertise has earned the industry a role in governmental decisions about tobacco regulations, treaties and laws. She posed a rhetorical question if ever there was one.MALONE: Should an industry that produces the single most deadly consumer product in history be involved in regulatory decisions about what to do about it and other products that are potentially supplanting or replacing or adding on to the damages caused by cigarettes?So, never mind “lesser of two evils.” How about “the fox guarding the henhouse.”MALONE: Part of the problem now is that, as they do periodically with some frequency, some tobacco companies are engaged in a big makeover, a part of which is aimed at undermining the tobacco control movement on a global level. We have to think not just about the United States, but also what's happening globally, where countries are trying to implement the world's first public health treaty, which is the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the WHO  treaty. And one of the provisions of that treaty is Article 5.3, and this is getting a little into the weeds, but basically it says don't let the tobacco companies interfere with your public health policies. They should not have a seat at the table because they have a conflict of interest. That seems pretty fundamental. And that is a real motivation right now for the tobacco companies, is to get back to the table where they can influence policies and prevent policies that might hurt their bottom line.Clearly, til now, the industry has engineered near impunity throughout the developing world. In 2020, the aforementioned Bureau of Investigative Journalism published an expose titled The ‘Unsmoke' screen: the truth behind PMI's cigarette-free future, a piece that looked beyond Phililp Morris's do-gooder narrative for evidence of the same old same old. For example, quote:Since it announced its aim to stop selling cigarettes, it has acquired a new cigarette company, launched a new brand, and added enticing new flavours such as Splash Mega Purple and Fusion Summer. It has also launched legal action against anti-smoking policies in countries like the Philippines, and has carried on advertising cigarettes in countries that permit it.COMMERCIAL: Wanna stand tall? Be true, be bold, be strong, be brave, be daring, be free, be heard, be inspired? You can say yes, or say no. Just never say maybe. Never say maybe. Be Marlboro.That's a Marlboro commercial aired in Indonesia, a country of 271 million people.  Furthermore, according to the BIJ story, quote: “Some pupils in Indonesia can see PMI's cigarette advertising mere steps from their schools' gates. Young people attending festivals in Buenos Aires are offered PMI cigarettes in promotions with beer. Children visiting corner shops in Mexico can see Marlboro's ‘fusion' cigarettes next to sweets.”BRANDT: We need to be very skeptical of these companies that claim that they've crossed over to legitimate health oriented products because they've made these claims, you know, since the 1950s.Allan M. Brandt is a professor of the history of science at Harvard and author of The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America. In 2012, for the American Journal of Public Health, he wrote Inventing Conflicts of Interest: A History of Tobacco Industry Tactics.BRANDT: They told Americans, you know, if you're worried about smoking, smoke filter cigarettes and that was the beginning of Marlboro. You know, you had a cowboy smoking a safe cigarette, which turned out not to be the case. So I'm very skeptical and worried about the current situation with vaping, e-cigarettes, other nicotine related products, and the idea that we're just a responsible company trying to mitigate the harms that our principal product has produced for over a century.And as you probably know, just in the last month, it was reported that the American Journal of Health and Behavior published a entire issue on harm reduction and Juul vaping. And it turns out we're not quite as naive as we used to be. It became clear and it was widely reported in the press that the issue of this journal was completely paid for by Juul and the work was done in Juul labs. They return to this strategy of: we can produce the science. And it has muddied the waters and diluted the authority that science really needs to have positive public health impacts. And we really need science. And science has to speak with expertise and authority and validity and clear and aggressive peer review. And we need to know the difference between something that is a fact and something that obscures facts.GILCHRIST: There's no doubt that misinformation and conflicting information is confusing adults who smoke.That was Moira Gilchrist, who holds a PhD in pharmaceutical sciences, back in June. She was not speaking of Big Tobacco's century of disinformation and its toll. In a video about Philip Morris's smoke-free initiative, she was addressing current conflict about smoke-free.GILCHRIST: One day they hear good things about smoke-free alternatives and the next they hear scare stories, and as a scientist I find that really, really upsetting. Because the science is very clear.It's a corporate video. Gilchrist is PMI's Vice President for Strategic & Scientific Communications, whom I spoke to this week. I asked her if she was struck at all by the irony of her complaint, what with Philip Morris's own sorry history of obfuscation and all.GILCHRIST: Well, look, I think I'm not going to speak to, you know, the past history of any company or an industry. What I'm focused on is today and what we know today, and we've made a real deliberate effort to make all of the science publicly available so that people don't have to trust us. They don't have to take our word for it. They can look at what the data says. And we've gone really, really strongly to ensure that we're using open science principles, sharing not just our own conclusions, but also the source data on which we've based those conclusions, so people can feel cynical and feel skeptical. That's fine, but they cannot ignore the data. And that's all I ask, is that independent scientists look at what we've done and look at it with an open mind in order that we can get the facts straight and make sure that adult smokers have the right information to make the right decisions.GARFIELD: We've heard from scientists who do embrace the benefits of a smoke free world, and we have heard a great deal of skepticism about Philip Morris's motives. We've heard both those things. One accusation, though, is that you are creating, excuse the expression, a smokescreen for influencing governmental tobacco control authorities around the world. Indeed, Olczak said that very thing, that authorities cannot not listen to your science.GILCHRIST: So that, again, we've made the science openly available. We've submitted it to regulatory authorities like the US FDA, who spent three and a half years poring through more than a million pages of evidence in order to make a decision to authorize our product. And so this is what we're asking governments to do, because governments can play a really important role in ensuring that adults who smoke have the right information, ensuring that they have access to these products that are a better choice than continuing to smoke. So I think that's what we're asking governments to do. And many of them are doing so. And I think that's really encouraging for the more than a billion smokers all around the world.GARFIELD: I just want to make sure that we agree on some basic facts. Philip Morris does now buy by legal agreement and in its public statements acknowledge that, that smoking burning tobacco does cause cancer, does cause heart disease, does cause emphysema and and so on.GILCHRIST: We have been clear about that for many, many years, and in fact, before I joined the company. We've been very clear that cigarette smoking is extremely unwise because of the diseases that it causes and premature death that it causes. And that's why we set on this path of creating alternatives so that people who don't quit can have another choice that they can go to. The best thing they can do is to quit because these products are not risk free. But if they're not going to quit, they should really consider switching to a smoke-free alternative.GARFIELD: So I believe the follow up question, and this is not a question you've not heard before, is why the f**k is Philip Morris still selling combustible cigarettes anywhere? Something like 800 billion coffin nails a year are being sold and consumed worldwide. Why not just shut that part of the business down today?GILCHRIST: So Bob the key word is transformation. This cannot happen overnight. By 2025, we want to be a majority smoke-free company. So I think we're making tremendous progress. We still have a long way to go. And that's why we're calling on governments to help, because regulation can really help to encourage adults who don't quit to switch to better alternatives.GARFIELD: Who says that the solution is transformation and not cessation? Along this path that you've described, there are, according to the World Health Organization, eight million people a year around the world who will die of smoking related illnesses. Why transform instead of just stop?GILCHRIST: So here's the thing. If we, Philip Morris International, chose to stop selling cigarettes altogether, that would not solve the problem of smoking because most adult smokers would simply switch to our competitors' product and there would be absolutely no impact on public health. So the approach that we've taken is to encourage those people who don't quit to instead switch. And in this way, we can reduce the number of people who are smoking combustible cigarettes and at the same time still make a profit for us as a business. So I think transformation is the way that we can have not just a long term future for the company, but also make a positive impact on public health.GARFIELD: Til now, we've been speaking of science and technology and business. I want to ask you about just fundamental morality. If I, for example, choose not to go into a Walmart with an AR-15 and shoot up the place, gun violence in America will not disappear. But I myself won't be a murderer. I will have not contributed to gun deaths. Isn't that reason enough for me to stand down?GILCHRIST: Look, again, we made a very deliberate decision that the best and quickest way we can get to a smoke free future is by developing, scientifically assessing and commercializing products that are a better choice than continuing to smoke. And if we were to stop selling cigarettes tomorrow, unilaterally, it would not have an impact on public health.GARFIELD: Perhaps I'm naive, but what I'm actually asking about now is a better outcome for the corporate conscience. Is it not better if you are not participating in what has been called the Golden Holocaust?GILCHRIST: So, look, I joined the company to do exactly what we're doing, and that's to provide better outcomes for each individual adult smoker and also better outcomes for our company as well. And I think that's what we're doing.Gilchrist chose not to address the question of conscience further, but rather just reiterated the smoke-free strategy. So I asked Tobacco Control's Ruth Malone approximately the same question.MALONE: I'm old enough to remember one time when a juice company had some salmonella — some contamination of their products — they pulled all their products off the market until they could be, in fact, made safe and they instituted new procedures to make them that way. The tobacco companies have repeatedly said they would do that if it was ever found that their products were unsafe. But in fact, they have never done that. I just think it's time to call their bluff on all this and say, you know, don't just talk about this. If you're really serious about this, then change the nature of your corporation. Become a B corporation. Be working on behalf of the public good. Get rid of the combustibles altogether. Quit selling them.GARFIELD: Yeah, yeah, when pigs fly.MALONE: Yeah, I'm afraid so.GARFIELD: I just wonder if you were in a lake and you were drowning, and the chairman of Philip Morris came running to you and threw you a rope. What would you do?MALONE: I don't know if there's anything at the other end of that rope, so I'd look and see if anybody else had a life preserver. And I'd probably swim. I'd try to swim.All right, we're done here. Next week, Part 2: Crime Against Humanity.Before I sign off though, let me repeat what I said a week ago. If you enjoy a Booksmart Studios show, please please please share it with your world. That's what those little buttons are for, and we depend on our listeners to get the word out. Also, if you become a paying subscriber to Booksmart Studios you'll get extended interviews, additional content, access to the hosts and — in my case — continued access to my weekly column, which is for the moment free to sample. At last count, there were 94 fucktillion podcasts out there, but nothing quite like what Booksmart is up to. Please help us make an impact.Now then, Bully Pulpit is produced by Mike Vuolo and Matthew Schwartz. Our theme was composed by Julie Miller and the team at Harvest Creative Services in Lansing, Michigan. Bully Pulpit is a production of Booksmart Studios. I'm Bob Garfield. Get full access to Bully Pulpit at bullypulpit.substack.com/subscribe

Raucher sterben statistisch gesehen früher, möglicherweise sterben sie sogar bald ganz aus. Schon in wenigen Jahrzehnten könnten Zigaretten aus den USA, Europa, Australien und Lateinamerika größtenteils verschwinden. Womit verdient die Tabakindustrie dann ihr Geld?Mit Claudia Oeking, Geschäftsführerin von Philip Morris Deutschland.Haben Sie Themenvorschläge? Schreiben Sie Kevin Schulte auf Twitter: twitter.com/schultekev Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://datenschutz.ad-alliance.de/podcast.html Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://art19.com/privacy. Die Datenschutzrichtlinien für Kalifornien sind unter https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info abrufbar.

Not quite an e-cigarette and not the old paper kind either, the Iqos is the latest controversial device to enter the vaping wars.

No i wracamy!!! Po niespełna miesięcznej przerwie o czym mówimy na odcinku, nagralismy dość soczysty epizod, w którym mówimy o najnowszej becie Modern Warfare. No powiem szczerze, że w końcu seria wraca na właście tory i wszystko wskazuje na to, że szykuje nam się najlepsze Call Of Duty od lat. W odcinku powiemy Wam co nowego w kinie, po premierach filmów Tarantino i Vegi, recenzjumy F1 2019 oraz testujemy IQOS, czyli papieros XXI w. Enjoy!W odcinku: Energylandia (part2)PolitykaPewnego razu....w HollywoodF1 2019Temat główny:Modern Warfare BetaHejter Zone:iPhone 11 ProMożecie komentować pod odcinkiem, na naszym fanpage'u oraz możecie wysłać do nas maile. Poza tym jesteśmy na Youtube'ie i Twitch'uOgólny: bezimiennypodcast@gmail.comMuzyka: Lukhash - Hongdae See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

My guest in the first 1/2 hour tonight on The Tami Jackson Show* is Phil Kerpen. Phil Kerpen is president of American Commitment, a nationally syndicated columnist, chairman of the Internet Freedom Coalition, and author of Democracy Denied. Prior to joining American Commitment, Kerpen served as vice president for policy at Americans for Prosperity. He has also worked as an analyst and researcher for the Free Enterprise Fund, the Club for Growth, and the Cato Institute. A native of Brooklyn, N.Y., Kerpen resides in Washington, D.C., with his wife Joanna and their three children. Phil joins me tonight to talk about his recent article, "FDA Tobacco Policy Faces Key Test." Kerpen writes: Shortly after Scott Gottlieb took over as the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, he announced a paradigmatic shift in the agency's approach to regulating tobacco products centered on harm reduction – the idea that smokers who can't quit outright can get nicotine from products other than cigarettes and dramatically improve their health outcomes as a result. The first test of the extent to which things have really changed at the FDA comes with the application of a product called IQOS from Philip Morris, an electronic device that heats tobacco enough to release nicotine – but without combustion and all of the health harms associated with the products of combustion. Listen as Phil and I discuss the future of tobacco and the surprising hostility to these moves away from nicotine addiction. Most of my listeners know if Phil Kerpen's "in the house," they'll be hearing substantial facts and good, sound argument on a topic that most likely won't be covered in Mainstream Media. ***************** In the second 1/2 hour I'll be flying solo, talking (ranting) about a couple hot current topics! What in the world is happening with media and social media censorship of conservatives? How is it affecting the information you actually read and hear daily? The latest MRC in depth report, "CENSORED! How Online Media Companies Are Suppressing Conservative Speech is stunning," but no surprise to those of us who work daily fighting the good fight in the digital media world. The report begins: Like it or not, social media is the communication form of the future — not just in the U.S., but worldwide. Just Facebook and Twitter combined reach 1.8 billion people. More than two-thirds of all Americans (68 percent) use Facebook. YouTube is pushing out TV as the most popular place to watch video. Google is the No. 1 search engine in both the U.S. and the world. War is being declared on the conservative movement in this space and conservatives are losing — badly. If the right is silenced, billions of people will be cut off from conservative ideas and conservative media. Click here to order the (free) full report from MRC. And I will also be talking about my latest investigative article, "Planned Parenthood: Killing the Preborn and Perverting the Already Born." The material is abhorrent, but vital for parents and grandparents everywhere. Planned Parenthood and other anti-conservative, anti-Christian groups are angling to propagandize America's children with radical and perverse sex ed. This is definitely adult information, but it's dire and you'll want to know what's going on in education. Follow Phil Kerpen on Twitter at @kerpen , and me at @tamij AND tweet your questions/comments during the show. *Sponsored by Camera Security Now, your premier source for surveillance and access control systems for business nationwide; by ROBAR® Companies, a True Custom firearms and firearms finishing shop located in Phoenix, AZ, and found online at RobarGuns.com; and by Dispatches, your site for the BEST conservative resources to fight and win the information war.