Podcasts about segways

Dead On Arrival: What was just Hype and what was just wrong Timing? Some technologies and products get over-hyped, and never seem to come to fruition? Some just come to fruition, but years or even decades later? In this episode of Tech Deciphered, what is Dead On Arrival versus just wrong timing Navigation: Intro The Fork Cold Open General Magic The Metaverse Dead on Arrival The soon to be Resurrected… Conclusion Our co-hosts: Bertrand Schmitt, Entrepreneur in Residence at Red River West, co-founder of App Annie / Data.ai, business angel, advisor to startups and VC funds, @bschmitt Nuno Goncalves Pedro, Investor, Managing Partner, Founder at Chamaeleon, @ngpedro Our show: Tech DECIPHERED brings you the Entrepreneur and Investor views on Big Tech, VC and Start-up news, opinion pieces and research. We decipher their meaning, and add inside knowledge and context. Being nerds, we also discuss the latest gadgets and pop culture news Subscribe To Our Podcast Bertrand SchmittIntroduction Welcome to Tech Deciphered episode 78, Dead on Arrival. Was it just hype or just wrong timing? In this episode, we are going to discuss two different types of businesses that as an investor, as an entrepreneur, you want to think carefully about. Looking back, you want to understand better what happened. If we take dead on arrival, we’re talking about businesses, technologies that maybe the tech work fine, but actually no one cared about it, no one wanted it. It’s really a mismatch in terms of what consumer want versus what you are trying to deliver. It’s a classic example of a solution finding for a problem. On the other hand, will it happen but not like that, not now? It’s a type of business where we were too early. We tried to make it work, but actually the technology is not ready now, but it might become ready in the future. As an entrepreneur, as an investor, obviously, you want to make sure you are not in one of these two technologies, one of these two categories. But it’s really a useful lesson to learn which situation you might be in because it will help you make better decision and pick better industries going forward. Nuno, what’s your take on this tough analysis?Nuno Goncalves PedroYeah, in hindsight, everything looks like, “Oh, of course, this wasn’t meant to work,” etc. But here we’re going to take a stab, as you mentioned, at things that are just wrong timing. They might have failed miserably in the past, but they might work in the future. The Fork To have this stake on the ground approach to it, as we’ve had in previous episodes, of defining exactly what we think will happen, but just not like that, versus the dead-on-arrival, which is a little bit more of a hardcore view on it. To your point, we want to really split between those two things because in some ways people are like, “Well, are we ever going to go and have different ways of interacting, for example, in terms of input and output, like with glasses or things like that, that really scale to become pretty pervasive?” We probably would agree that, “Yes, that will happen”. Maybe not in the way that we’ve anticipated until now, and certainly it’s going to take longer than we’ve expected. In some ways, the “will happen, not like that” is a little bit like Amara’s law or Nuno’s law, as referred to in the past. We tend to overestimate the speed at which we get to a revolution, underestimate impact. The “will happen, not like that” will probably fit into that. They will have probably bigger impact than we thought they would, but they will just take longer. Therefore, the solutions we’ve had until now are not great solutions. Whereas the dead-on-arrival, we’re saying, “Hey, we don’t think actually this works.” It’s to your point, not solving a problem that actually needs to be solved, or it’s solving it in the wrong way. Yeah, it’s basically an attempt to really frame, if you’re an entrepreneur, if you’re a venture capitalist, if you’re someone who is an angel investor and is looking at the market right now, what things should you put some real money and real resources, real time behind versus not, and really share that with you guys: our audience.Bertrand SchmittCold Open I always like to go back to a company called General Magic, a company that was legendary in Silicon Valley, spun out of Apple in the 1990s. There was even a movie made about General Magic. It’s a company that tried to basically build the first modern smartphone with touchscreens, app ecosystem. The only issue was it was years before the technology existed to support it. But Nokia at the time was less ambitious and more practical with what the technology was able to do at the time. But what’s interesting with this company is that obviously the smartphone was coming, just took 10 more years, 15 more years. Interestingly enough, some of the people in the team ended up being very successful in that exact space. Tony Fadell, for instance, who ended up creating the iPhone, co-create at least, and Andy Rubin, who end up building up Android, selling that to Google and leading the charge with Google Android.Nuno Goncalves PedroYeah, a very successful team. Tony Fadell, obviously, later on did Nest as well. Megan Smith, who was later the Chief Technology Officer of the US. A lot of people that came out of it that did a lot of important things. To be honest, I think a lot of the technology that was developed that was in some way a capacity or that are reused later on by some of these team members. I’m not saying they were infringing on any IP, but definitely there was a lot of reuse of tech. But it was too soon, right? They were doing something that was truly ambitious too soon. But a lot of these principles, a lot of these things ended up manifesting themselves, and particularly in the iPhone later on and in that deployment. Another such example is actually the metaverse. We did two episodes back in the day, a long time ago, on the metaverse. We debunked it a little bit. Back then, I think it was a very nuanced debunking, if I recall it correctly, Bertrand, because we were saying, “Hey, it’s going to happen in some ways, but it’s an evolution, not a revolution,” not in the way that we saw definitionally. We were huge fans of Matthew Ball and his analysis around media, but somehow we disagreed, I remember, with his definition of what the metaverse is and how it will look like. There’s no doubt that there’s going to be a metaverse in the future, probably metaverses in the future before there’s any given unification. In those metaverses, we do believe. But this whole hype cycle around metaverse and what’s happening clearly didn’t work out well, as proven also by all the write-offs done by Meta on their metaverse stuff. That much must have hurt. It’s related to AR and VR as well and to the enriched reality positioning of a lot of these technologies, which we’ll talk about later. But, again, it was probably something that’s going to happen. It’s going to happen likely in a different product manifestation as the one that was anticipated by a lot of the pundits that opined on what’s happening around metaverse in the future. But it’s going to happen. It’s just going to take longer. It’s going to probably come from angles of entry that are likely not what people had anticipated earlier on. Maybe it’s from gaming, maybe from something else. But definitely it’s going to happen.Bertrand SchmittYes, and you could argue that Apple did a similar mistake with the Vision Pro. I think the Vision Pro is the worst launch of an Apple product. When we say launch, it’s been three years maybe?Nuno Goncalves PedroSince the Newton, maybe?Bertrand SchmittYes, that’s my point. You have to go back a really long time to have such a disastrous launch. I think for me, it’s very interesting because it’s really a category where on one side there is a metaverse of some sort. You should argue if you are just using Twitter, or Facebook, these are some parallel universe in parallel to your real life. But the full on metaverse where you need some extra super heavy glasses to make it work, that simply has not worked. Don’t get me wrong, there are some super small, narrow cases where your heavy VR glasses makes sense for some training, for some simulation, for some light gaming. But given the weight, the disconnection from the real world, it has really never taken fire. Even at cheaper price like Meta was able to do, at more expensive price, much higher quality like the Vision Pro did. It looks like people have an issue with putting heavy glasses on top of them. We’ll talk later about the other side: AR glasses. But the traditional metaverse, heavy glasses, VR glasses, yes, it’s not feeling right, and I don’t think it will ever be right. It needs a different form factor to go at scale.Nuno Goncalves PedroDefinitely fundamental shifts on the metaverse. Just a quick reminder, Meta actually changed their name because of metaverse.Bertrand SchmittYes. Nuno Goncalves PedroIt’s not just that they’re writing off the investments, it’s their name is apparently wrong. It didn’t really happen in that way. You are saying that this persistent embodied virtual world, which was the early definitions of what a metaverse was, didn’t really happen until now. It might happen at some point, but not in that way. But, obviously, a lot of the enablement layers are still work in progress, right? Real-time 3D, presence, avatars, all of these things are moving on. A lot of these enablers will be ready once there is a time where these technologies and businesses that are fundamentally anchored around these technologies will emerge. It’s, again, right components, wrong product alignment, but at the same time, it will happen, just not yet.Bertrand SchmittAgain, I think we’re going to face a split of a virtual reality light that you can call AR with very light glasses that are not a pain to wear, that are more limited, especially today or the next 5 years. The VR glasses that will stay a niche product that are useful for some use cases. Do you want to do a flight simulation? You want to do military training? There will be use for that. But beyond that, it’s more limited. We forgot to talk about the Google Glass. This one was an early, early AR glasses. But, again, here we go back to the capabilities. Simply, we were not there at the time.Nuno Goncalves PedroDead on Arrival We’re moving to Dead on Arrival. What things do we think are relatively dead on arrival? We’ll be nuanced on a couple of these aspects. Not everything is totally dead on arrival. But maybe let’s start with a good one, which is some of the crypto summer promises, particularly around NFTs, non-fungible tokens, and the decentralization of everything, the tokenization of everything. That didn’t quite work the way people thought it would. A lot of people were very happy for a period of time that they had some NFT that was worth a ton of money. Good for them. I hope they sold it back then. Some did actually, fortunately for them, but most of them did not. As an asset and the tokenization element, we’re not questioning that tokenization itself doesn’t make any sense. But from my perspective, a lot of the elements of tokenization plus the tokenization of everything don’t make necessarily imminent sense. I think we’re going to have a world that not everything is going to be tokenized, and a world where, to be honest, having the latest ape token as an NFT is maybe not something I really need. It’s dead on arrival in some ways. What do you think, Bertrand?Bertrand SchmittIt feels like it’s a tale of two worlds. On one side, there was clearly exuberance and bullshit. All these cryptocurrencies that make no sense, have no values. The NFTs are the same: no values, no sense, no logic in them. At the same time, we can see that Bitcoin, Ethereum, and few others were significant products, invention, that have a current total market value that is significant. I would say we can see that step by step, little by little, there is some tokenization happening, but it has been much more narrow than what was initially thought, expected. But it’s happening step by step. I think there is value in tokenization, but definitely not as much value as people expected. I think for one simple reason: it’s very expensive to set up in the sense that it doesn’t work so well, actually. It requires a lot of computing power for stuff that might not justify it as simple as that. Why do you want to replace a very efficient, superfast database by something slow, expensive to maintain? Why? You need to have real reason for that. I think in most situations, there was not a real justification to make that switch. I think, again, there is a niche for tokenization. It’s getting used. Obviously, there is stablecoin as well that are working and provide value. But definitely, the use cases have narrowed. The success stories have been few and far between. It’s definitely a space, but I don’t think it has lived up to the expectations. The expectations were simply quite insane in terms of what to expect, and it failed to achieve that. I don’t think it qualifies as a true revolution. It has been successful again in our situation: in Bitcoin, in Ethereum, in some tokenization. But beyond that, it was not the dramatic change that people were picturing.Nuno Goncalves PedroYeah, it’s been successful and there is a security, in this case, a currency of types, that links to the value of that specific network and the utility of that specific network. But on this case, in particular, the NFT stuff, I think there were two core premises that were very valuable about it. One was the premise of digital collectibles, the element itself being collectible and the fact that I have a unique one was only minted one. It’s a unique thing out there. I think at some point people forgot that actually digital collectibles are not as valuable as people think they are. Physical collectibles are more valuable. The reason for that is just human nature. I want to have something in physicality. I want to have something that I can show people, etc, that has a physicality to it. Digital collectibles, I think there was a problem fundamentally in part of the articulation of NFTs that reside in the value of digitization of these collectibles in and of themselves. I think that was part of the problem. The second problem was really the notion of provenance, the notion of certification, the notion of “this is what it says it is, and nobody can say this is something else.” This notion of provenance. That, I think, fits more into the point you were making, which is the point around use cases. This doesn’t fit all use cases. The provenance piece and the certification piece doesn’t fit for all use cases. Probably it might fit actually even more for actual physical assets where you want to have a certificate, that thing is what it says it is, but it’s actually maybe a physical asset rather than a digital asset. Again, lo and behold, it doesn’t apply to all the use cases that relate to provenance. I don’t think we need to tokenize all the provenance ledgers in the world for this to be working well. Again, it was a little bit of an overreach. In some ways, all these players were very happy. There was a lot of bullshit. To be honest, this is an area that I do think there was actual active fraud. All due respect to a lot of the players in the market, but there was active fraud. Honestly, there was bullshit.Bertrand SchmittI agree with you. I was going to say that it’s one of the rare sector in technology where I think frauds, scams were prevalent. Yes, you might have some shitty startups in general and stuff, and there might be fraud. I think true fraud is rare. True scam is rare. But here for NFTs, for cryptocurrencies, that was the majority you could argue. That’s the part that I never really liked in all that industry. If you look at NFT, personally, I never understood the concept. For me, it made simply no sense because, yes, you can say, “Oh, I have created this rare digital token.” But sure, so what? Who cares? Who cares? You can have hundreds, thousands, millions of unique digital tokens. How does it matter? What’s the use case? What’s the connection? You can show it on your screen, but then how is it unique anymore? It’s not like people have to come to your house and check stuff on site or something like physical art. No, not at all. I don’t know. I think it was surprisingly true bullshit. Again, I’m still a believer in Bitcoin. I think there is true logic to have a separate virtual digital currency. But you don’t need hundreds of them. You just need one, maybe two for some variation. The same for tokenization, it doesn’t need to happen everywhere. Just need to happen where there is really strong real logical value. Beyond that, there is no point.Nuno Goncalves PedroYeah, makes sense. Maybe moving to our next one. I think we discussed this in a previous episode, which was the whole 3D TV stuff. We just don’t think that’s the product, right? It’s not going to be a 3D TV. I believe when we discussed this in the episode—I don’t want to lie too much—but I believe that’s what we came up with… It looks a bit more holographic or the manifestation comes through other mechanisms like glasses, etc. But we thought it was just dead on arrival. Nobody wanted to have glasses on the couch to watch the 3D TV, but also the 3D TVs themselves they tried to develop were very holographic, were super clunky and very heavy. In some ways, I think TV manifestation somehow is not a great manifestation for this. I put it on the dead-on-arrival pile. I have one, just to be clear. I still have one.Bertrand SchmittYeah, but it’s a weird one because if you remember, it suddenly happened. I remember being shocked as a consumer. Suddenly everyone talks about 3D TV. In a few months, 3D TVs are all out everywhere. Then after a few years, no one bothered to keep adding that because consumers didn’t care. I think one issue was, I think it has only worked with Blu-rays. I don’t think any streaming service supported that. With the rise of streaming, that was certainly a pretty big issue in the first place. Interestingly, in the movie theaters, do we still have movies being shown in 3D? I think we still have a few, but it’s really few and far between the movie theater.Nuno Goncalves PedroYeah, IMAX won on that format, the high-end format, IMAX won, not the 3D thing.Bertrand SchmittBut, yeah, if you’re on the TV at home, you don’t want to bother. Maybe if you’re in the movie theater, more high-end experience, you are willing to wear special glasses. I think it makes sense. I think, I guess at home, we are just too busy doing multiple things at once. Rarely sitting all around 2 hours for a movie, so you watch your phone, you check on something else. You don’t want to have these glasses on top that block you from the rest of what’s happening at home.Nuno Goncalves PedroYeah, it just didn’t work. I’m not sure it will work in any case, so we’ll see. But definitely, I don’t think that’s the right form factor.Bertrand SchmittIt technically worked, but practically, it was not accepted by consumers.Nuno Goncalves PedroLet me rephrase. I think it was a solution to a problem nobody thought they had. The execution of the product was the wrong one. It’s like that’s not what people wanted. Maybe we do want some 3D immersive experience, but that’s not the 3D immersive experience that we want, not manifested like that in effect, with its limitations, etc.Bertrand SchmittI want to say that we are not denigrating some of these experiments. Me, I still remember putting a Vision Pro and watching some content that is natively created by Apple for the Vision Pro. It’s an amazing magical experience, truly. But at the same time, I’m always worrying to have to think I’m going to spend 30 minutes putting my Vision Pro on my head. It’s heavy, it’s painful. Again, we go back to, I’m disconnected from everything else, and I don’t like that.Nuno Goncalves PedroWhen there was real technological development, like the case of 3D TVs, that technology development may have served other purposes. Again, we applaud those that put the money where their mouth was, the companies, the individuals that wanted to move forward some of these technology stacks, maybe less so the people that just decided to create NFTs for the sake of it with apes. No attack on those guys specifically, but just to create a specific view on that. But there’s a lot of stuff we’re talking about today which is actually great technological development. There’s stuff that came out of it that is very, very valuable technological development. Maybe to our next one on mobility, physical mobility. The Segway. Everyone’s like, “Oh, this is going to change how we move around the world, in particular for shorter distances, etc.” Well, apparently no. Apparently, it’s not super intuitive. There are still Segways out there for use by police forces, tours, and all that stuff. People say, “Oh, it’s…” No, well, it never scaled. It wasn’t changed. It didn’t change how relatively short local mobility was going to be done. I think part of it is actually the problem with the product. The product is not as intuitive as people thought it would be, and it has other issues around that in terms of security and safety. If you’re going to have a device or something that moves you around, what’s the minimum-accepted level of security that you would have. The fact that you have to incline to move it is actually not super as initially some probably people thought it’s actually not as intuitive as some might have thought it was. I think it’s a dead-on-arrival play. The vehicles of the future, I’m not sure, look like that at all. Happy to eat my words down the road, but I don’t think so.Bertrand SchmittYes, and I remember the massive hype at the start of this product. They were hiding it, but still telling you, We have seen it. That’s true. It’s going to totally change how cities are planned. I mean, the level of hype and bullshit was insane before the launch of the product and before anyone outside of a few knew what it looked like. Then we saw what it looked like, and it was on one side, an engineering marvel, the self-stabilization system was new. I mean, very few people had seen something like this before. At the same time, as you said, the issue was what happens if it loses battery? What happens if you fall from it? Quite frankly, if you look at today’s modern electric scooter, you have 95% of the value of a Segway without any of the downsides. You don’t need to learn a new way to do things. If you lose battery, it still works. I guess you can still push it. It’s not too expensive. You don’t have massive computers to just make it work. You don’t have massive robotics. It’s clearly an impressive engineering solution. But the exact example of a solution to a problem people didn’t have, when ultimately a much more simple and elegant solution was there for people who care. To be clear, you still could use a regular bike. The alternative was still your regular bike. But now you have electric scooters that are a clear, closer alternative, I guess, in spirit to what was supposed to be the Segway. Sometimes, let’s be careful. Overengineering might not be the answer.Nuno Goncalves PedroEven scooters, which are, to be honest, I would argue a much easier philosophical view of how mobility should be done and a much easier form factor, so to speak, in terms of mobility, even those won’t have wide adoption to everyone. It’s not like everyone’s going to use a scooter. The bar for a scooter is much less than a bar for a Segway.Bertrand SchmittYes. I think in a way, the electric scooter is showing us in some ways that the limit of the dream is that even well-executed, even cheap, even easy to use, even low-risk in a way, there is still only so much that people are willing to use it because it’s a pain to bring with you everywhere. Actually, in some ways, you could argue it has only worked with this distributed platform, like lime and others that let you take one and drop it when you are done using it. But that was not a model that was workable for the Segway. I totally agree. You could argue that bikes are still the gold standard or now electric bikes are still the gold standard for who want that level of mobility.Nuno Goncalves PedroWell, the next one is to be a favorite of, I guess, everyone that didn’t invest in them, which is Juicero, which was the machine that basically created Juices out of squeezing a bag. I’m going to be nice here to… There were a bunch of well-known investors. They raised, I think, 120 million or something like that.Bertrand SchmittThat’s insane.Nuno Goncalves PedroIt is insane. But maybe the vision was not that vision. It was something grandiose and the complexity around dealing with liquids and whatever. I’m not really sure we didn’t pass or invest on the company.Bertrand SchmittBig old juice bags.Nuno Goncalves PedroMaybe. You’re being facetious. Anyway, I’m not trying to attack the guys who actually invested in this, the investors that put money into this. But it was basically one of these examples that we’re trying to solve a problem that didn’t exist. It’s like a solution for a problem that doesn’t exist. I can just squeeze a bag of concentrated thing and make a juice. I can do something around the juice. As I said, maybe the big vision was well beyond that, and I’m not sure many of us will ever know what the big vision actually was. But yes, it was a solution, a $400 machine to a problem that nobody really had. That didn’t work.Bertrand SchmittI think the most crazy part of the story is that the business exploded when there was this Bloomberg reporter that showed that you could squeeze the bag with your hands without a machine and get the same juice. That’s pretty insane. That’s just so unbelievable.Nuno Goncalves PedroThe funny part of the story is MSCHF, this company that does all their on-point, slightly artistic, whatever, one-off, drops, etc, etc. Shout out to Gabriel. Gabe Wally, who was the founder there. This is funny. They actually did a collectible series of figurines of that startup toys, of which Juicero was one of them. Jibo, which I don’t think you’d appreciate. Bertrand, and the Theranos minilab. So someone is also making money on that, which is funny. So well done, MSCHF.Bertrand SchmittWhy not? Why not? Maybe we can go quickly over Lytro. This one was, I would say, brilliant technology. It was a camera able to capture light in a different way. You could actually dynamically change focus after the picture was taken. So something quite impressive, and I still remember looking at their products and thinking, should I get one? At the same time where it didn’t work, it was too limited in terms of image quality versus shooting the real picture. It was very tough to sell as an independent device because either you’re in the phone or you are in a DSLR, but there was no spot in between. In some ways, phones solved the issue not directly, but they kept adding cameras. At some point, you had not one, but two, but three, but four, but five cameras in your phone. You had a specific mode for anything you needed, and that’s it. Phone manufacturers managed to convince people they should pay for all these cameras, or provide a low-end version if you don’t want to pay for all these cameras. But yes, very interesting technology that did not manage to find a go-to market.Nuno Goncalves PedroYes, it’s falling in love with a technology solution that, as you said, was incredible, and not falling in love with what problem you are actually trying to solve. Because a lot of the elements of the problem that you’re trying to solve, either you take another picture. All due respect, instead of me trying to change the field of view, etc, and the focus, post picture taken, I take another picture. To be honest, you can take thousands of pictures now with different setups. Also, ignoring the fact that this was pre this whole AI boom. So obviously, that one I will be kind on. But with the AI boom, you can do a lot of things to pictures and changes and stuff like that. All of that changes the game in and of itself. Obviously, Lytro or Lytro, not sure how you spell them, or how you say their name, but they failed before that. So again, this was super great tech, great investors, good investors on board, but just nobody wanted that device. Why would I want this thing? A total failure on arrival. I think one also other aspect of it that may have been misinterpreted and underestimated by some of the early investors, certainly in the company, is the value chain. There is a value chain for cameras, for SLRs, DSLRs, etc, etc. They know what they’re doing, and they’re doing their own level of innovation. In some ways, that fits squarely into that value chain, which I’m sure is a complex value chain to manage in and of itself. Maybe that’s created its own dynamics as well.Bertrand SchmittI think they try to insert themselves in the value chain, but I’m not sure first that they managed to get technology as small as it should have been. They simply didn’t convince anyone. The Sony or Nikon of the world, or the Apple or Google of the world, to use their technology in their phones, because no one really saw the value, per se. One thing to keep in mind, using their technology means you had a big trade-off in terms of megapixels. Actually, you will benefit from that great effect around the focus that can move anywhere after the fact. But in exchange, you had to lose dramatically the number of megapixels. At the time, all the rage was about how do I get more megapixels for my phone with good image quality. That was all that you were selling to consumers. Consumers would not have bought 10 times less megapixels for a weird benefit that at the time no one cared about. I think you are very right to introduce the fact that, of course, they could not have guessed at the time, but today you can get for free this refocusing effect with AI, actually.Nuno Goncalves PedroThat’s exactly the point I was making on the value chain. They went into a value chain that has a lot of players in it, and they got kicked in the butt anyway, because people were like, Why would I adopt it? They didn’t serve the purpose of the use case or the user flow. They didn’t anticipate competitive dynamics to it. Then they actually went straight up into a technology plus IP logic on a value chain that would be like, “Hey, dudes, just get out of here.” What would be the incentive for people to bring them on board? It’s like in some ways, they did all the mistakes under the book in that sense. Again, I’m not trying to diss the company, the founders, the investors, but it feels that was the problem in the end.Bertrand SchmittYes.Nuno Goncalves PedroShall we do some rapid fire dead-on-arrivals?Bertrand SchmittYes. A fan favorite. Have you tried a keyboard projector on?Nuno Goncalves PedroYes. I think I mentioned that in a previous episode, I did have one of the early ones and whatever. Yes, somehow we forgot that there’s other best, better ways of input, maybe voice would be a better way of input if that’s the problem, but anyway.Bertrand SchmittThis one is interesting because you just use it for one minute, and you discover it’s horrible.Nuno Goncalves PedroIt’s a horrible experience.Bertrand SchmittYou have to type on it. You don’t see exactly where you type. Each time you type, you are hurting your fingers because it’s not a smooth keyboard feeling, but you are tapping a solid surface. That’s amazing that it went to manufacturing, and basically no one gave feedback. There is no way it’s working. No way technically working, but practically, no one would want to use that.Nuno Goncalves PedroIt’s bad in all aspects. The finger’s touching. It needs to be a very over-engineered experience for it to actually detect the key stroking and all that stuff. It’s an over-engineered solution by default. It’s not private because once you have the keyboard projector, you’re like, “Where am I keyboarding projecting on?” It’s something that others can see. There are other alternatives that are better. The keyboards on our phones are pretty good these days, with autocorrection in most cases, I wouldn’t say all cases. Voice can also be an interesting replacement to that. If that’s what you’re going for, voice recognition has improved dramatically over the last few years. Again, it’s one of these, “Yeah, cool.”Bertrand SchmittIt’s clear that, first, touch has replaced a physical keyboard where you need one. And two, now voice recognition is getting better for sure.Nuno Goncalves PedroThe opposite side is that voice assistants were going to take over everything, that everything was going to be voice assistant-led. Alexa is going to run your life. You’re going to have games for voice. I actually have a good friend of mine who did a startup in that space. Actually, the company got acquired, and everything’s going to be voice, which, as we know, is also not true. We need to visualize sometimes. Sometimes we still want to write because we want either the added value of privacy or of expression at some standpoint. There are a lot of things that are happening around voice that are exciting. We just mentioned voice recognition, but not everything is going to be voice. Certainly not for the foreseeable future, and so that doesn’t work. Also, as the ultimate platform, we also want some visuals. We also want to have other kinds of interactions. There are limitations to voice assistants, for example. Voice assistants were not quite the next platform that people said they were going to be. I would say they’re a channel, but they’re definitely not a platform. That’s how, at least I see them.Bertrand SchmittYes, a channel versus a platform. I would agree with you. I must say I start to feel that we could be close to the future we have seen in Her. This movie, Her, I guess you saw it as well, where these guy keep talking to his personal assistants, and it’s becoming his friend, maybe even his love. I start to feel we are getting close enough with AI that this becomes a possibility. But again, it’s not your only way to interact. You want to type, you want to see stuff. There are many situations where you don’t want to be seen talking with someone. It’s more of a channel versus a platform. Yes, Alexa, it’s quite amazing how it went to the roof and crashed and burned. It moved up very quickly. Amazon invested billions, hired thousands of people, which was the right move. I mean, you have something that seems to work well enough and could be game changer, why not? But it was quite impressive as a crash and burn. It’s pretty rare to move that fast up and down.Nuno Goncalves PedroI agree. A lot of money is put into this stuff. I mean, Google went after it as well. I think Google probably executed better. Their tools and their hub tools, etc, were better in their devices. But to be honest, it was the beginning of something, it wasn’t really there. It’s shocking because a lot of people have Alexa at home, and Google Hubs at home, and whatever at home. But it’s really not that powerful. I have a bunch of Google stuff at home, and I still use it for very basic information. It’s not really doing much for me. It’s not like magically now with AI, it’s going to be much better. It’s not. It’s a legacy device now. Maybe in the future, we’ll have some stuff that will be cool, but definitely not the voice assistant manifestation that we saw in the past. I know the next is exciting to you, so I’ll let you go for it, Bertrand.Bertrand SchmittNetbooks. If you remember Netbooks, this was a horribly underpowered PC device. I kept buying one after the other, hoping that the next one would be fast enough. Trying to be a small, lightweight portable PC, they were called netbooks. Usually, they also had a small screen, like 10, 12-inch, 9-inch, and each time it was horrible. Very poor battery life, 2-3 hours, super, super, super slow. They were equipped typically with a full Windows OS, and they were killed overnight by the iPad. After 2 years of the iPad, no more netbooks. Oh, yes, and they had this… Typically, they would be equipped with… What was this name of the CPU? It was an Intel Atom CPU, I believe, or Celeron. Again, the root cause why, it was so slow. It was horribly slow.Nuno Goncalves PedroSo netbooks didn’t work. We didn’t want to go back to that. The iPad won and all [inaudible 00:34:05].Bertrand SchmittI think it has been proven at this stage. There are some small mini PCs these days. You have, for instance, the ROG Ally for gaming. There has been some revival with some Chinese manufacturers making some small PCs. I have to admit, I bought some, so I kept trying. It’s much more powerful, no question. Better battery life also. But we go back to the fact that if you have a very limited screen size, 7, 8, 10 inch, it’s just tough to put a full desktop operating system to good use. You need something more simplified, more touch friendly for it to be really practical. Yes, you can run the full desktop Excel on it, but will you do it on an 8-inch screen? Probably not.Nuno Goncalves PedroNetbooks, and maybe we’ll end with Google Glass. I mean, obviously, we’re going to talk about AR and VR in just a bit. I think it’s a good segue to our next section, and we’re not necessarily saying AR, VR is dead on arrival. We actually think they’re going to be out there for us in the future. But Google Glass, in the way that a lot of the first wave wearables were developed, was cool, but not enough. I think even the recent ones, the Meta Ray-Bans. I see a lot of friends of mine now, you’re wearing Meta Ray-Bans, and they’re like, “Oh, this is so cool”. It’s like, “How is that different from the Google Glass, but now a little bit nicer?” It still feels to me that’s the wrong way to approach it. Either we go with a more comprehensive solution for glasses or a solution for glasses that’s a little bit more easily integrated into existing frames, etc, for those of us, like the two of us, who have actual eyeglasses, or I don’t see it quite happening this way. I think just as a formality in how it was deployed, it seems to me it’s been the wrong angle a couple of times, even, to be honest, beyond the first wave of wearables. It’s been a little bit the wrong way to approach this, the wrong paradigm.Bertrand SchmittIf you remember the Google Glass, initially, they were launched in… Again, overhyped. You couldn’t even buy them, but still, it was overhyped. You could see a marketing department going crazy when they were showcasing models wearing Google Glass, that sort of stuff, fashion shows. That was insane. How is it connected to the value proposition of the Google Glass? Absolutely not. But you remember what killed the Google Glass?Nuno Goncalves PedroThis is the Robert Scoble in the shower thing. The whole lack of privacy thing.Bertrand SchmittYou tried to have this vision of the Google Glass that models are wearing and stuff in fashion shows. You have this guy, Robert Scoble, taking his picture with his Google Glass in the show, half-naked. Oh, wow, that quickly dropped. In the interest into Google Glass.Nuno Goncalves PedroRobert’s a good guy for the most part, so we’ll let him get away with it. But yes, it was not a good moment for the use of Google Glass. But to your point, it was overhyped. I don’t even recall that I had to do so many things to actually get access to one. I still have it. Then in the end, it was just totally underwhelming. I do think the meta Ray-Ban solutions, etc, etc, now they’re doing it with other brands as well, are more elegant because it’s around voice activation and stuff like that. But still, it’s not this. The soon to be Resurrected… I think these kinds of solutions are dead on arrival, which may be a good segue to the resurrection pile, so to speak, that will happen, just not like that pile that we have to share today.Bertrand SchmittYes. That’s the question. Are we in resurrection mode with AR glasses? The Ray-Ban, Oakley glasses, are the way to go? There are also some other brands like XREAL, for instance, that are a different approach. It’s more fun to watch movies that I personally like a lot and use a lot. I know quite a few fans for this. There is a market for either the XREAL for movies, meta, or Ray-Ban, for light information on top of your glasses. There are niches. I don’t know if it’s full resurrection mode yet, but I can see again, with AI, that there is the ability to do more and more. Will it be connected to your phone, will be independent from a phone? That’s also stuff to see. I guess at this stage, connection to a phone has some value. It’s making a comeback.Nuno Goncalves PedroI think it’s suffering from being overhyped. It makes sense that the category comes back. The use of glasses, a lot of people actually have eyeglasses. The use of different mechanisms that really expand your view. We’ve seen that with the advent of foldables in mobile phones. People want bigger screens. They want to get as close as they can to the tablet experience without necessarily having to go to laptops, etc. Definitely, I think the use cases make sense. It’s just how do you deploy it, and who’s going to deploy it best? I don’t think we’ve seen anyone that’s been particularly enlightened about doing it. All the great developments with Android XR from Google, Samsung doing a bunch of things in terms of deployment out there as well at the same time. I mean, are these guys going to redefine this category and create the first ever wearable, at least AR great experience or VR category of experience, or are we going to have much of the same? In the same way, it took several years for the smartphone category to be recategorized as a smartphone category under the iPhone. That was the category-defining moment. It was the vision of a bunch of people, obviously led by Steve, but a bunch of people that went to market and said, This is how we view the market to be, and they just nailed it. We haven’t seen the guys who’ve nailed it, I think, is the issue thus far, either on the VR side or the AR side. We just haven’t seen it.Bertrand SchmittDefinitely, we have not seen that. There are, of course, rumors that Apple is ending their Vision Pro program, and at the same time, is full-on on AR glasses, an alternative to the Meta Ray-Ban. We will see. I start to think I have trouble to see Apple pull this off because it starts to feel that, yes, they are great at making more efficient supply chain these days, but I feel after 10 years plus of Tim Cook leading the business, that’s all there is to Apple these days: thinner phones, pink colors for your latest device.Nuno Goncalves PedroVariations.Bertrand SchmittMore efficient chips, for sure. They have great chips. But beyond that, they canceled their car program, the Vision Pro was not successful in the marketplace. They have trouble to find the next story and to execute on the next story, quite frankly. You could argue that their most successful recent launch has been the AirPods.Nuno Goncalves PedroI think that’s absolutely spot on. We’ve discussed it in previous episodes how much… It’s taken much longer than I thought it would. I always said after Steve’s passing, that it would take maybe 5 to 10 years for the beginning of the demise of Apple, and it is taking longer. There was definitely some gravity created. Steve passed away in 2011, right? They’ve been hanging on to their time, so it’s now 15 years. It seems that only now Apple is really suffering in terms of product lines. Probably they started 1 or 2 years ago. They have a new CEO coming in September, so we’ll see if John will do a better job, if he’s really a product guy, and that’s how he’s going to go for it. He’s going to go for a few products really nicely done that can have great experiences, which is Steve’s hallmark, instead of what you said was the milking of the cow, so to speak, under Tim Cook. There’s nothing wrong with it created in a hugely valuable company with a huge amount of still innovations around the edges, but it’s like now they need real product innovation, a new category definition, play, and is John going to be the guy for that or not?Bertrand SchmittYes. Positively, Tim increased market cap of Apple. He didn’t destroy the business. We are not trying to tell that Tim Cook was a failure, but definitely it was not Steve Jobs. It was more a caretaker, optimizer type of CEO. But to go to the next level, you need another type of CEO. Quite frankly, it’s hard to find when it’s not a founder CEO.Nuno Goncalves PedroYeah, I think it will be difficult to find, but we’ll give John a chance once his time comes in September 2026, as one would. Moving to another topic that we’ve discussed in the past, self-driving. It’s going to happen. We all are waiting for it to happen. Self-driving cars, self-driving vehicles that we don’t need to drive in this mess of traffic, in particular spending a lot of my time in Southern California where traffic is incessant. The driving is… How can I put it in a nice way? Awful. People don’t seem to know what they’re doing. I think we all want to have self-driving cars. It’s taking longer than we thought it would, but I do think it’s going to happen. I wouldn’t put a mark on the sand on how long to get this world of self-driving cars. It’s going to coexist with non-self-driving cars for sure for a period of time. But I, for one, know deeply that it will happen, and I look forward to it. I love driving, but not in horrible traffic with horrible drivers.Bertrand SchmittWe are for sure very close. I mean, now, Tesla self-driving is extremely good. I have taken Waymo many times with great experience. It’s not going too fast, it’s not going on the highway, so there are some limits. But I would say really impressive all in all. I think we are pretty close. I don’t know if you know, but Waymo is working on expanding to many, many more cities, actually. I think we might be at a tipping point there. Quite frankly, I expect that teenagers in 10 years from now are not going to bother to learn driving. I mean, we’ll see, but I think many won’t.Nuno Goncalves PedroI mean, Waymo is now doing also stuff on freeways, certainly in the Bay Area. I had a friend of mine who took one recently, and he was scared. He was scared shitless—I think that would be the right way to put it—because the car wasn’t going that fast, people are aggressive on the freeway around your car. But to your point, I’ve used it in city. In the city, it’s great, and it’s aggressive enough. That’s one of the things I was a bit afraid about Waymo, that it wasn’t going to be aggressive enough in city driving, it is pretty aggressive. Yeah, maybe we’re closer than we think. Maybe it’s a couple of years rather than a decade, which is normally where we put the stake on the ground. But it’s definitely going to happen. I think there was an overhype too soon. There were great movements around level 3 and level 4 autonomy that in some ways were misconstrued early on as full autonomy. But now we will likely get what we ask for. Then at some point someone’s saying, “Hey, but why don’t we just have the flying objects instead?” We’ll get back to that. The flying car stuff, the eVTOLs and all that stuff, we’ll see.Bertrand Schmitt10 years ago, I remember the overhyping was very, very strong with self-driving. I nearly believed the bullshit. It was so strong in 2015, 2016 that nearly everyone thought it’s here in the next 12 months, basically. I think that was a lesson for quite a lot of people. Don’t trust the Silicon Valley bullshit machine, hype machine. It can go way too strong, way too fast. You absolutely need to spend time to understand realistically where we truly are. You cannot just buy the premise.Nuno Goncalves PedroMoving maybe to robotics and humanoids. Again, it’s going to happen both for consumer and for industrial. The humanoid form, I think, at some point will be important. Just not yet. I think we’re behind now the big buzz sentence is embodied AI, where you have physical AI manifestations. AI manifested through robots and other kinds of devices. It’s going to start happening in certain beachheads. But, hey, we’ve had this offer for a long time, and I know you still have your frustrations, Bertrand, with the Sony AIBO. I won’t traumatize you more than that, but definitely it will happen. We will have humanoids at some point. We’ll have different specialty devices that will help us in activities that we do both as consumers and also in the B2B and enterprise space, even in the industrial space. The writing’s on the wall that definitely is going to happen.Bertrand SchmittYes. I think the question, as always, is how do you get there? I think the intermediate steps of your optimized robot, a physically optimized robot, like a Roomba to clean your home or some other robots to mow your grass, a good example, I think initially you have to start a small, practical, not too technology advanced and progress your way. Truly humanoid robots are very disruptive because technically, if they work, they can do everything a human could do. But practically, I don’t think it’s that true because a lot of constraints. You have to have enough weight, you have to have enough force, you have to have enough vision, you have to have enough AI to just understand commands and move around. But, again, with all the progress in AI, the progress in electric motors, I am optimistic that there is a chance for the humanoid robot, but it’s not 3 years. It’s probably not even 5. It’s probably more like 10. Let’s not forget that a lot of demos with humanoid robots today are fake. It’s a remote operator, remotely controlling a robot. It’s not a robot working by himself in many, many, many situations. That, I think, is another thing hurting the reputation of some of these companies because these fake demos, they look great, but once you dig a bit, you realize it was a fake demo because it certainly didn’t come with a warning that it’s remotely operated.Nuno Goncalves PedroMoving maybe to the next one that it will happen, but not exactly like that. Quantum computing, I think for the most, it’s been in many cases a solution looking for problems. It’s beautiful, but it’s like, “What’s the problems we’re trying to solve?” I think we’re going to start having beachheads into problem solution and apps. I’m sure a lot of people out there would say, “Well, there’s already killer apps for this, a lot of the scientific modulation, cryptography, breaking, all that stuff.” But I’m like, “Yeah, cool.” It still feels very much like a bunch of pieces and hardware in effect that is trying to solve a problem that needs to be very much defined into several problems, several areas of problem solution going forward. Will it happen? For sure. I’ve been hearing about quantum computing since I was in college, since I was 17 when I got into college. I’m sure it will happen. It will have manifestations. There’s a lot of stuff probably already residing on some of these instances. But a full mainstream view of what quantum computing can do for us is still quite ways out.Bertrand SchmittYes, I mean, there has been some reports that some key steps in the technology starts to be working and that potentially the technology could start to deliver results in the coming 2-3 years. What I mean by results, results that will dramatically change how you need to encrypt because a lot about quantum computing is actually trying to decrypt the current technologies that are used to protect your information online. This one is big. If we manage to have a limited use of quantum computing things that work in a few years, that will have a dramatic impact on how we encrypt data. That’s the one piece I’m looking for: do we really manage to solve encryption with computing? If yes, then we need to make a lot of changes how we encrypt things.Nuno Goncalves PedroFusion energy, the gift that keeps on giving, but this somehow doesn’t fully happen. I know you’re a big fan.Bertrand SchmittI would say, practically, I’m a big fan of nuclear fusion energy because in a way, it’s working. It’s solved in terms of safety. Latest Gen5 reactors are ultra-safe. They cannot go out of control anymore. China has a working reactor. In some ways, part of me would say, “Why bother with fusion when we have fission that is working extremely well, and we know how to make?” If we are efficient about the process, we could make for really cheap. Having a better source of energy today will already be great for the world. I would like to see scale with fission. It’s great to research fusion. Fusion is near a limitless form of energy. This is exciting. I think what’s interesting with fusion these days, it’s not just the big governments working on spending billions before seeing any potential returns, but there is a lot of startups that are working on it. The bar went lower in terms of researching fusion. That part gets me excited. But again, I think we should go fission first and parallel with some fission investment, fusion research, and hopefully, fusion comes at some point, but we should not wait for fusion would be my big take.Nuno Goncalves PedroGood point. Last but not the least, we’ve dedicated episodes on this, so maybe today we’ll just do the little teaser. If you guys haven’t heard our episodes on AI and the bubble and all those things. The last big one that’s just not like that, it will happen is AI itself, and in particular, AGI, so generalized AI that will be just like a human. Obviously, it’s happening. We’ve discussed in previous episodes, there’s a lot of breakthroughs in terms of methodological approach beyond the GPT curse of actual hallucinations that doesn’t seem to be solvable. There’s a lot of things happening around reinforcement learning, evolutionary computation, and other methodological approaches to AI that we think will create tremendous breakthroughs. There’s definitely a lot of funding going into it. We quantified it recently. I think 63, the number probably has changed in the last couple of weeks, but 63 new AI labs that have raised significant rounds upfront, just getting into the market, some of them as high as hundreds of millions or even over a billion dollars for the first round of funding. Obviously, there’s a lot of dramatic things happening in that space. There’s a lot of capital going to that space. It’s going to happen. It’s going to take much longer than, I think, we think it’s going to take. I just saw, I think, Marc Andreessen recently saying, AGI is already upon us. Maybe it is. Maybe he knows something we don’t know. But I suspect we’re still ways to go in a lot of the developments on AI. For now, it will continue its complications and its limitations. But definitely it will untap a lot of great productivity enhancements, technological enhancements, even in the short term that at least I’m very excited about. Then the AGI story, I think, will be a story that will be told later.Bertrand SchmittI might actually disagree on this one. I actually believe, like Marc Andreessen, that we are at AGI. We reached AGI a few months ago with the latest ChatGPT 5.5 with Claude Anthropic, Opus 4.7, 4.6 even. For me, in some specific space, let’s say coding, for instance, I truly believe we have reached AGI. It is totally replacing people for development, testing, writing, specifications, doing design. Yes, there are some use cases where it’s not working as well. But for at least the coding side, I think AGI is truly there. Is it better than the best human experts at every piece of the puzzle? No. I think if you go to some very specialized development stuff like a CUDA development, for instance, or some kernel development, it might not be at the level of the top human experts. But as we can hear about stories around security to the new versions that are unreleased yet of Anthropic and others seem to be at the level of the best human experts at cybersecurity. I think we are actually there. I think that’s why there is an acceleration the past six months in terms of investments in data centers. There was a big question in 2023, 2024, 2025, “Are we investing too much? Is it a bubble?” And so on. That was true because revenues were increasing, but not that fast. The increase in the growth in revenues for Anthropic is insane. No one has ever seen that in the whole history of technology, what happened to them the past six months. Growing so fast at such a scale, no one has seen. I think that’s truly because they have stumbled upon AGI for coding. Coding is such a huge, large market that even if we are just solving coding, even if we never solve more than that, I think it’s already one of the biggest markets in the world, full stop.Nuno Goncalves PedroBut that, for me, I think maybe it’s a definitional thing. That, for me, is still narrow AI. AGI, as defined, is a type of AI that can match or surpass human capabilities across virtually all cognitive and intellectual tasks. Coding is just one of them. I think there’s a lot of narrow AI right there, to your point, that can replace humans maybe today. Coding may be a great example of that. But I don’t think we are at the AGI. I haven’t seen any agents out there that can replace fully human beings, where I would not understand that they’re actually AI. Anyway, again, maybe you guys have seen stuff that I haven’t seen. I just feel there’s a lot of overhype on what the AGI actually is. But the ability to surpass us as human beings, I haven’t seen it yet across the board, not on a specific domain.Bertrand SchmittYes, I think my point is that I have seen it on a few domains. If you look at mathematics, for instance, and there are more and more examples of people who are using AI to solve math problems that only the very top people in the world were able to solve that are now being solved by AI. I start to feel that we are getting a few examples in different fields where AI is matching the absolute best experts in the world. I would just go back in terms of market size. Already what we got today, and today is not the limit, but what we got today, and especially AI combined with all these agents, harness agents, that’s also that specific combo that makes a difference. This is, for me at this stage, huge market. Does it solve everything? Does it replace a human for everything? No, you still need the human in the loop. You don’t let your AI go wild for weeks and just check once in a while. But you could argue very few humans are able to do that, quite frankly, to run by themselves for weeks without control.Nuno Goncalves PedroI feel there’s still a great deal of confusion because there’s dramatic impact on narrow AI domains where things are being done that weren’t done before, where there’s these great mathematical proofing, coding stuff is being done very easily, etc, etc. But still that, for me, is not the definition of AGI. AGI is a human being. It’s like someone who can really be a human being. Ideally, become top end of what a human being will look intellectually across domains. I don’t think that’s where we are. Again, maybe definitional, maybe that’s what Marc means, but I mean-Bertrand SchmittYeah, the question is, what does it mean? I would argue it’s beating 80% of humanity today pretty easily. Most of humanity doesn’t know how to code. It will be unable to do coding at the level AI is doing. It will be unable to do math at the level AI is doing. Use ChatGPT to check for medical issues and stuff. It’s not perfect for sure, but, again, it still beats most humans. I don’t know. I feel that we are reaching a level where it’s truly beating most of humans, many experts in many fields. I feel the definition of, “Hey, it has reached the level of an average human being.” I would say it passed that one. Is it the same as a human being? No. But reaching the level of your average human being, I think we are there in a lot of fields.Nuno Goncalves PedroConclusion Well, in conclusion, in episode 78 of Tech Deciphered, we went into two piles: the pile of dead-on-arrival products, technologies, businesses, and the pile of “it will happen, but not like that” or “not yet” pile of technologies, business out there as well. We went into a bunch of topics today that were of extreme importance back in the past where we thought the world was going to change, anywhere from self-driving to fusion in the nuclear space. We also went into some dramatic, dramatic mistakes like Juicero and other deployments like Segway that seem to be really very much dead on arrival. With that, I would ask you if you’re excited, and you want to share with us some of your agreements or disagreements on today’s episode, as well as your own dead-on-arrival versus merely-early examples, feel free to do so on LinkedIn, X, or via email. Thank you, Bertrand.Bertrand SchmittThank you, Nuno.

Die aktuellen Wirtschaftsnachrichten mit Michael Weyland  Thema heute:     AvD für Halterhaftung bei E-Scootern    Unfälle mit E-Scootern sind laut Statistik ein wachsendes Problem im Verkehr. Die Bundesregierung hat deshalb im März 2026 einen Gesetzentwurf zur Verschärfung der Haftung in den Bundestag eingebracht. Geschädigte sollen es zukünftig leichter haben, Schadensersatz zu erhalten. Der Automobilclub von Deutschland (AvD) sieht die Maßnahme als Erleichterung für die Durchsetzung von Entschädigungen für betroffene Verkehrsteilnehmer. Die gesetzliche Vorgabe soll für Halter von E-Scootern und anderen Elektrokleinstfahrzeugen (EKF) wie Segways oder selbstbalancierende Gefährte gelten. Sie alle sollen künftig der sogenannten Gefährdungshaftung unterliegen. In Anspruch genommen werden können Halter solcher Fahrzeuge dann unabhängig davon, ob sie ein Verschulden trifft oder nicht.    Das Vorhaben ist mit den stetig steigenden Unfallzahlen durch E-Scooter, darunter auch Todesopfer, begründet. Die registrierten Unfälle stiegen von weniger als 6.000 im Jahr 2020 auf über 12.000 im Jahr 2024. Fast die Hälfte der Beteiligten ist dabei jünger als 25 Jahre. Auffällig ist zudem der Anstieg von Unfällen, bei denen Dritte geschädigt werden.  Die 5.000 von Versicherern regulierten Schadensfälle 2023 standen zu 40 Prozent im Zusammenhang mit Leih-Scootern, obwohl sie nur 20 Prozent des Gesamtbestandes dieser Fahrzeuge ausmachen. Falsch abgestellte E-Scooter stellen inzwischen ein alltägliches Sicherheitsrisiko für sehbehinderte Menschen dar. Unerlaubterweise auf Gehwegen abgestellte E-Scooter sind faktisch Barrieren, die zu Verkehrsunfällen mit schweren Verletzungen führen und schon geführt haben. E-Scooter auf Bürgersteigen kreuz und quer abzustellen ist nicht nur rechtswidrig, sondern hochgefährlich.  Nutzer von E-Scootern haften Mit der Gesetzesänderung soll bereits der Betrieb von E-Scootern die Haftung auslösen, die sogenannte Gefährdungshaftung. Ein individuelles Verschulden ist dann durch den Geschädigten nicht nachzuweisen, um Schadenersatz vom Versicherer zu erhalten. Bisher scheiterte die Forderung häufig daran, ein persönliches Verschulden des letzten Nutzers des Rollers festzustellen. Selbst bei schweren Verletzungen von Passanten, die über einen achtlos abgestellten Scooter stolperten, sprach die Rechtsprechung keinen Schadenersatz zu. Der AvD sieht hier ein erhebliches Gefährdungspotenzial für Fußgänger und Radfahrer durch E-Scooter als motorisiertes Fahrzeug. Dazu kommen die Verletzungen von Mitfahrern auf den Trittbrettern – deren Beförderung ausdrücklich verboten ist.   Diesen Beitrag können Sie nachhören oder downloaden unter:

The June 1st edition of "Good Morning Woodland" marks the start of the final stretch of the school year, with seven days of classes remaining before exams and graduation. The hosts discuss the resurgence of kids on bikes and jokingly suggest Segways for school security.Recent polls show a preference for traveling to the past over the future, while the new poll focuses on Stanley vs. Owala drinking containers. Key announcements include the Halo awards, a Senor Ponchos fundraiser for Fine Arts, and free summer passes at Planet Fitness.In general news, a meteor recently shattered over the New England border, and the SS United States is set to become an artificial reef. NBC has also canceled several programs, such as The Kelly Clarkson Show, to accommodate a new NBA broadcasting deal.Sports updates cover Woodland's tennis playoff losses and upcoming baseball and softball games. In professional sports, the NBA Finals will feature the Knicks against the Spurs, and PSG recently won a major soccer match on penalty kicks. The World Cup is slated to begin in approximately ten days.Charge those Chromebooks and turn in those library books.

This week, Dusty wants a pause on anything new, Brian has an awkward occurrence at a Bed & Breakfast and a viewer has a specific request about singing on the podcast. Then the guys delve into what happened in the year 2001 by discussing Segways, Wikipedia, the IPod and where they each were on 9/11.Quince: Quince.com/NATERefresh your everyday with luxury you'll actually use. Head to Quince.com/NATE for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada, too. Chime: Chime.com/NATEChime is not just smarter banking, it is the most rewarding way to bank.  Join the millions who are already banking fee free today. Head to Chime.com/NATE. It just takes a few minutes to sign up.Laundry Sauce: https://laundrysauce.com/NATELANDMake laundry day the best day of the week! Get 20% off your entire order @LaundrySauce with code NATELAND at https://laundrysauce.com/NATELAND #laundrysaucepod #adRidge: https://www.Ridge.com/NATELANDUpgrade your wallet today! Get up to 40% off @Ridge during their Father's Day Sale when you go to https://www.Ridge.com/NATELAND #Ridgepod #ad

Epic rides, unforgettable stories, and a look inside one of Colorado Springs' most iconic outdoor adventure companies.Outback Jake and the Flying Scotsman from Adventures Out West talk biking adventures around the Pikes Peak region and the story behind the longtime local family business. Founded in 1973 by native Coloradans Bruce and Patty Wellens and now run by their son Greg Wellens since 2003, Adventures Out West has become a Colorado Springs adventure staple.From guided bike rides and jeep tours to Segways, zip lines, and hot air balloon rides, this episode explores the many ways Adventures Out West helps visitors and locals experience the beauty and excitement of the region. If you love outdoor adventure and discovering what makes Colorado Springs special, this episode is for you.Host: Torie Giffin, Owner Buffalo Lodge Bicycle ResortGuests:Outback Jake, Adventures Out West Ride GuideThe Flying Scotsman, Adventures Out West Ride GuideMentions and Links to show topics: Adventures Out West https://advoutwest.com/Buffalo Lodge Bicycle Resort https://www.bicycleresort.com/Garden of the Gods https://gardenofgods.com/Gold Camp Road https://www.alltrails.com/trail/us/colorado/gold-camp-roadManitou Springs https://manitousprings.org/Pikes Peak America's Mountain https://coloradosprings.gov/plan-your-visit-pikes-peak-americas-mountainPedal the Springs is produced and presented by the Buffalo Lodge Bicycle Resort, the only bicycle-themed lodging and must-stay for cyclists coming to Colorado. Check us out at https://www.bicycleresort.com for more information.Episodes are recorded in the Studio 809 Podcasts community podcast studio at The Next Us. https://thenextus.spaces.nexudus.com/?public&Find other great podcasts produced in and for the Pikes Peak Region - at https://studio809podcasts.comDon't miss an episode of Pedal the Springs. Follow on your favorite podcast app.

Small Town News--whose headline is it, anyway? @SmallTownNewsImprov

Ninja Nurse Book: https://amzn.to/42n9Fqz TKF -KFP Blend 1.Leaders 2.Ando Mierzwa 3. Saturday Mental Meals Shurite Troy June 26-28 2026 https://shuritebujutsu.com/seminars%2Fevents Support A Kids Dream https://gofund.me/e745a0e7 Injuries, ailments and bruising are part of being a martial artist. Sore muscles, joint tweaks and broken bones can happen in martial activity with many variables dictating the outcome. We want to identify the most important variables or potential risks. The injury rate in martial arts is similar to other contact sports. In a study, # Comparison of Shotokan Karate Injuries against Injuries in other Martial Arts and Select NCAA Contact Sports By John-David Swanson, Ph.D. Department of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Salve Regina University, Newport, RI 02840 Martial arts has "myriad physical and mental benefits. Physical benefits include improved balance, meaningful exercise, and the ability to protect oneself against a physical threat [2]. It is also a physical art, with flowing movements that support one's connection to his/her movements." A review of research revealed there is a 1 in 5 chance of being injured in a shotokan tournament and 1 in 4 chance of being injured over the course of time training. The mean percentage of reported injuries thru 10 studies 1. Contusions 47% 2. Epistaxis (nosebleed) 20% 3. Laceration 14% 4. Sprains/strains 3% 5. Concussions 2% some as high as 7% the most injury-prone arts appear to be Jujitsu (97.5%), Aikido (51%), and Kung Fu (38%), followed by Judo, Karate, and Tae Kwon Do which all were at 20-21%. The least injury prone martial art of those studied is Tai Chi (14%). Which I define as the Wellness versions, but may include pushhands and some strengthening work. Over a 16 year NCAA research study, the only collegiate sport that had a higher injury rate than shotokan karate was football witha 36% injury rate. Soccer and ice hockey following respectively. The major risk factors for injury in the Martial Arts are the 1. time spent in training, 2. age of the participant, 3. the experience of the participant. 4. Specifically, it was found that overtraining, and older and inexperienced participants presented the highest risk of injury. As you might imagine, these factors compound, so an older, inexperienced person has a much higher percentage of getting injured. Professor Swanson states, "The single most important factor in preventing injury is the education and experience level of the instructor [14]. This indicates the requirement of having a strong organizational “apprenticeship” or instructor qualification that includes specific instruction in warm up and cool down procedures, injury prevention and the mechanisms of prevention, the ability to determine overtraining, the ability to give appropriate advice to students in the implication of techniques in both execution and results of delivery" Segways to why this is an important book, Ninja Nurse by Peter Jones. The Essential Guide to Injury Management in Martial Arts. It is available on amazon, goodreads and several other locations. Contributing to the validity of this 300 page book is that Peter is a nurse, has over 30 years of multi-martial experiences and deposits volumes of this information into one book. Ninja Nurse is an excellent guide to all aspects of injury prevention or reduction in martial arts. Chapters include health screening, risk assessment, and aspects of the training environment. Also, You Get a deepdive into children and to combat sports. It also includes true stories, useful links, and where to find important forms if you have a school. Peter takes you through a process, how to: 1. Reduce and prevent injury 2. Treat injury 3. Learn from the injury The book emphasizes content for the instructor. Peter walks through potential problem actions such as : 1. Breakfalling 2. Striking and padholding 3. Chokes and strangles As I read through the book, I noted that Peter provides you a good idea of what a legimate martial arts first aid kit might look like. Granted, any is better than none. However, This is particularly useful if you are not sure on how to build your martial arts first aid kit. Then please, make sure that you can use everything that is in it. https://www.nationalcprfoundation.com/courses/standard-first-aid-3/. $12.95 2 years Reality Moment: Indiana Personal Injury Lawsuit Involving Karate Kick Moves Forward. Kicking Held Bags, Johnny the jackass has already been warned twice about trying to crush people, and on third, gets a lady, jump kicks her when she wasn't ready. she injures her knee in the fall that required surgery. She has sued Johnny, and the court has stated, "an individual's actions during a particular exercise or drill in a practice session can be viewed as “within the range of ordinary behavior of participants in the sport” or whether it is dangerous is for a jury to decide." It continues, "Responsible trainers and athletes keep themselves aware of both the risk of injury and the steps to prevent them." My understanding is that the injured lady is only seeking damages from Johnny Jackass and not the martial arts school. My guess would be that they did things as close to right as possible, except for yanking johnny on his second warning. Ninja Nurse is an excellent clinical reference broken into areas, such as: 1. Spinal injury 2. Chest 3. Neck 4. Limbs 5. And smaller join injuries. Peter discusses Mental Health Awareness and there associations to problems in your training hall. Depression, anger, bi-polar students will bring unique concerns that you can reduce with awareness. Peter states, "consider an acute mental health episode like an acute injury." Iain Abernethy said, ""it focuses on how to ensure training partners don't get hurt and how to help them if they do." Jamie Clubb says, "this is as an exhaustive work on the subject as one could hope to find." I would tell you that this book addresses a critical area of any martial arts training center. Its value is well worth more than the cost. Thank you Peter. References [Shotokan and Other Martial Art Injury Rates](https://thesportjournal.org/article/comparison-of-shotokan-karate-injuries-against-injuries-in-other-martial-arts-and-select-ncaa-contact-sports/)

Its the Halloween addition of The Shining Wizards Wrestling Podcast. Everyone is dressed up & ready to have a good time. Kyle from the Apron Bump Podcast joins us for HJC. We talk some about Halloween, Candy & then jump into 1997 to discuss the best & worst of the Year, which you can find on the Apron Bump. We then get to hear all about Matt's trip out to Handsome Kevin's for his 40th Birthday before taking a commercial break. Upon our return we jump into the WWE World, talk a little bit about Jey Uso winning the Rumble on last week's Raw & his title match with Punk . Revisit our conversation from last week about brining in new talent from NXT, and that Segways us into NXT Halloween Havoc. We talk a little bit of AEW notes and Abdulah the Butcher news before getting into homework. We go back to March 27 1993 for Ricky Steamboat & Shane Douglas vs The Hollywood Blonds. Find out what the boys thought about this match & chime in if we missed something. Brundo then drops ANOTHER great tag match for us to watch. It's from AJPW March 4 1992 The link is below https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-dIGg1LaoA

We've got one last look back before we plunge into the future. This week we're taking it way, way back to Episode 26 with the amazing inventor Dean Kamen. From Episode 26 - September 26, 2019: Dean Kamen is one of the greatest inventors of our time. He invented the Segway, the first drug infusion pump, and the Slingshot–a water purification device that requires no filters, can turn almost any kind of water into drinking water and can operate using cow dung as fuel. He also invented the LUKE (Life Under Kinetic Evolution) prosthetic arm for the Department of Defense's DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). And now, Dean has invented invented a revolutionary all-terrain electric wheelchair known as the iBOT. He rode to our interview with your host Paul Rieckhoff (@PaulRieckhoff) on the newest version that he unveiled to the world this week in New York–and shares why it can change history not just for the disabled and wounded veterans–but for everyone. Like all our guests, Dean Kamen is an iconic, important and inspiring American. One who's shaped what America has been in the past, is in the present, and more than any other guest we've had so far, he's shaping the future. One of Dean's proudest accomplishments is founding FIRST® (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology), an organization dedicated to motivating the next generation to understand, use and enjoy science and technology. This year FIRST® will serve more than 1 million young people, ages 6 to 18, in more than 86 countries. High-school-aged participants were eligible for more than $50 million in scholarships from over 200 leading colleges, universities, and corporations. Dean Kamen was Elon before Elon. But not all messed up. He's a much better person, he's a much better creator, he's a much better visionary and most importantly he's a helper. -WATCH video of Paul and Dean's conversation. -Learn more about Independent Veterans of America and all of the IVA candidates.  -Join the movement. Hook into our exclusive Patreon community of Independent Americans. Get extra content, connect with guests, meet other Independent Americans, attend events, get merch discounts, and support this show that speaks truth to power.  -Check the hashtag #LookForTheHelpers. And share yours.  -Find us on social media or www.IndependentAmericans.us. And get cool IA and Righteous hats, t-shirts and other merch.  -Check out other Righteous podcasts like The Firefighters Podcast with Rob Serra, Uncle Montel - The OG of Weed and B Dorm.  Independent Americans is powered by veteran-owned and led Righteous Media. Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0F1lzdRbTB0XYen8kyEqXe Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/independent-americans-with-paul-rieckhoff/id1457899667 Amazon Podcasts: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/49a684c3-68e1-4a85-8d93-d95027a8ec64/independent-americans-with-paul-rieckhoff Ways to watch: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@independentamericans Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/IndependentAmericansUS/ X/Twitter: https://x.com/indy_americans BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/indyamericans.bsky.social Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IndependentAmericansUS/ Ways to listen:Social channels: Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We've got one last look back before we plunge into the future. This week we're taking it way, way back to Episode 26 with the amazing inventor Dean Kamen. From Episode 26 - September 26, 2019: Dean Kamen is one of the greatest inventors of our time. He invented the Segway, the first drug infusion pump, and the Slingshot–a water purification device that requires no filters, can turn almost any kind of water into drinking water and can operate using cow dung as fuel. He also invented the LUKE (Life Under Kinetic Evolution) prosthetic arm for the Department of Defense's DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). And now, Dean has invented invented a revolutionary all-terrain electric wheelchair known as the iBOT. He rode to our interview with your host Paul Rieckhoff (@PaulRieckhoff) on the newest version that he unveiled to the world this week in New York–and shares why it can change history not just for the disabled and wounded veterans–but for everyone. Like all our guests, Dean Kamen is an iconic, important and inspiring American. One who's shaped what America has been in the past, is in the present, and more than any other guest we've had so far, he's shaping the future. One of Dean's proudest accomplishments is founding FIRST® (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology), an organization dedicated to motivating the next generation to understand, use and enjoy science and technology. This year FIRST® will serve more than 1 million young people, ages 6 to 18, in more than 86 countries. High-school-aged participants were eligible for more than $50 million in scholarships from over 200 leading colleges, universities, and corporations. Dean Kamen was Elon before Elon. But not all messed up. He's a much better person, he's a much better creator, he's a much better visionary and most importantly he's a helper. -WATCH video of Paul and Dean's conversation. -Learn more about Independent Veterans of America and all of the IVA candidates.  -Join the movement. Hook into our exclusive Patreon community of Independent Americans. Get extra content, connect with guests, meet other Independent Americans, attend events, get merch discounts, and support this show that speaks truth to power.  -Check the hashtag #LookForTheHelpers. And share yours.  -Find us on social media or www.IndependentAmericans.us. And get cool IA and Righteous hats, t-shirts and other merch.  -Check out other Righteous podcasts like The Firefighters Podcast with Rob Serra, Uncle Montel - The OG of Weed and B Dorm.  Independent Americans is powered by veteran-owned and led Righteous Media. Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0F1lzdRbTB0XYen8kyEqXe Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/independent-americans-with-paul-rieckhoff/id1457899667 Amazon Podcasts: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/49a684c3-68e1-4a85-8d93-d95027a8ec64/independent-americans-with-paul-rieckhoff Ways to watch: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@independentamericans Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/IndependentAmericansUS/ X/Twitter: https://x.com/indy_americans BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/indyamericans.bsky.social Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IndependentAmericansUS/ Ways to listen:Social channels: Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

SPONSORS: - Visit RocketRX now for 30% off your first order - https://rebrand.ly/1417a3 - https://www.skims.com/nottoday #skimspartner - Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at https://shopify.com/nottoday, all lowercase This week on Not Today Pal, Jamie and Rob dive into everything from the bizarre annual cheese-rolling festival in England to the dark realities of hazing in youth sports. They debate double standards around drinking at work, laugh at people wiping out on Segways and hoverboards, before Jamie's husband Cutter Dykstra takes the park bench. He gets into some real talk about life in the minors, rooting against teammates, kids raging on the golf course, and the highs and lows of parenting. The crew also compares “types” when it comes to attraction—angry girls, sad girls, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Big Ed, and everything in between. It's an episode packed with laughs, honesty, and Cutter's signature dry humor. Have a question for Rob and Jamie? Reach out at nottodaypalpodcast@gmail.com Not Today, Pal Ep. 109 https://www.instagram.com/jamielynnsigler https://www.instagram.com/nottodaypalshow https://store.ymhstudios.com Chapters 00:00:00 - Intro 00:03:09 - Cheese Wheel Rolling Festival 00:10:01 - Running With The Bulls 00:15:07 - Charity Events & The Joe Rogan Sandwich 00:22:22 - Let's Get Cutter In Here 00:29:30 - Married At First Sight 00:34:59 - Cutter's Weekly Instagram 00:38:34 - Rob's Ideal Type Of Broad Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kommende Streams:21.04. 18.00 Uhr – Mikkel BrotrahnKann man eine ganze Folge über Rockerbanden reden? Wir haben es ausprobiert und sind sehr zufrieden mit dem Ergebnis. Hoffentlich bringt uns nicht auf die Listen irgendwelcher Clubs, die nicht lustig fanden, wie wir über sie geredet haben. Aber unserer Meinung nach ist es wichtig, dass man sich mal über die Jugendarbeit Gedanken macht und Visionen entwickelt, in welche Richtung sich die Chapters entwickeln können. Sonst sind sie bald so beliebt wie Segways!Folge 394Zu unserem Twitch-Channel kommt ihr hier: https://twitch.tv/dasdilettantischeduettNoch mehr von Mikkel und Andi findet ihr hier: https://linktr.ee/dasdilettantischeduettCover: Fabian Sponheimer https://fabiansponheimer.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Well dang, this was episode 300? Then I guess we shall podcast in the shade. In today's episode Jax and the gang escape some droid police (DROID POLICE, BEEP BEEP BEEP) on flying Segways, while Rhinann whines and Nick Rostu... also kinda whines. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to Episode 166 of the ByoPodcast Ingxoxo99-------------------------------------------------------------Host: Kbrizzy Cohost: Maforty / Ralph Guest: RobertVideo & Lighting : RalphContent Producer: Mgcini Sound: Ralph / PrincePost production: RalphVenue : Cotton Lounge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Join our membership to support the channel :https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrJFvubYBiqw7cPQ63wgbOw/join

In this episode, we dive into the latest buzz in the world of film and TV! The Bond franchise has been shaken (not stirred) in a massive change to creative control, Ben Affleck is back for a second go as The Accountant, Warner Bros. Animation and DC Studios have announced a trio of new shows, and is John Lithgow playing Professor Dumbledore? Tune in for all the hot takes and updates!

Episode 237: The importance of the type of jelly or jam being used in a PBJ. Jessica Campbell's suit choice on her first night behind the Seattle bench. Goalie-ing & goaltenders for Team Canada & in the NHL. Conner McDavid breaks into the top 100 of NHL all-time scoring. Cassie breaks down Pittsburgh's defense. LA Kings players' epic group Halloween costume. PWHL teams releasing their new jerseys. The NCAA finally allowing CHL players to transfer into college hockey. Recorded 10 November 2024

The history of Segway's, who invented the Snuggie, learning how to deal with conflict, how important ethics are, a theory on religion and contraception, being too perverted to be a nun, delighting in a luxurious door-opening experience… It's all covered on this week's Nobody's Listening Right? Podcast. ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Support the show via Patron!  https://patreon.com/nobodyslisteningright Buy the Merch!  https://www.nobodyslisteningright.com/ Find us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nobodyslisteningright/ Watch us on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@nobodyslisteningright Find us on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nobodyslisteningright Shop with us: https://www.amazon.com/shop/nobodyslisteningright ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ 00:00 Intro 02:51 Sit Down And Chat 04:45 Couple's Therapy Jokes 06:03 Let's Get Ethical 07:07 Segways and Snuggies 11:57 Conflict Resolution Practice 23:17 Pinky Party 30:41 Religion & Contraception 40:06 Elizabeth The Nun 42:15 The Simple Joys 47:06 Back Door Fixed

segways

segways

Howard Stern is coming to WQAM, Joe Rose is on The Ticket, Hank has been suspended, and Neil can't talk about it. They are going to have a triple "dump" system, with Duff having the final say. Jamba's real name is Jerone. Follow the link to see Boca, and Skippy on Segways, watch the Ricky Williams Tribute Video, and read David Ross's Confidential Howard Stern

Before the positioning gurus tackle the marketing strategy of Designing and Building a New Category, they throw a red flag on Apple's latest iPad ad, and Starbuck's trend downward. Then Mark and Lorraine cover the next six rules of designing and building a new category. Learn what inverted marketing, insulating siding, getting there first, shooting losers, and Segways have to do with category creation. One of THE greatest moves you can make as a marketing is to build a new category, but it's not for the faint of heart. Proceed cautiously using this wisdom from our positioning duo.Spend 40ish with Mark and Lorraine as they talk all things marketing, advertising, and positioning.

How do you feel about minigames? What about a whole chunker of minigames? Not interested? What if I told you it was a BEACH EPISODE! But a beach episode that only lets you pick out swimwear for three out of four of the humans in your party at the time. Yes, the plot is put on hold for a moment as we park Segways, go on a photo hunt, and play some Doggy Rocket League. Please don't listen past the credits with kids around. You'll understand why. Also: - The Sydney Sweeney of Video Games - Either A Straight Thing or An American Thing - The Original American Psycho - Kreen's Blood - "What's Up With Americans?" on iHeartRadio - All the Dead Things - "I Just Lied." This Week: We reach Mt. Corel! Next Week: Finish Chapter 7!   Our Patreon: http://patreon.com/squarerootspodcast Thanks to Steven Morris for his awesome theme! You can find him at: https://bsky.app/profile/stevenmorrismusic.bsky.social and https://www.youtube.com/user/morrissteven Contact Square Roots! Twitter: @squarerootspod Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/486022898258197/ Email: squarerootspodcast (at) gmail (dort) com

The sibs watch 2009's Paul Blart: Mall Cop. We discuss how wild the parkour heisters are, give Kevin James his flowers, and get into the weeds on Segways. Email us at latchkeysibs@gmail.com Follow us on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TikTok⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Theme song: Produced by Gray Baker and Mitch Grimenstein; Mastered by Alex Mills Edited by: Holland Baker  --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/latchkey-sibs/support

‍‍What happens when you need to cut ties with your current IT company? This week's episode delves into that critical, but often overlooked aspect of business - offboarding from an IT company. Our returning guest, Reuben Kamp, shares unique insights on the importance of maintaining clear ownership of your data and domain names. He explains how things can get messy when organizations fail to plan for IT offboarding properly, and how non-compliance, especially with HIPAA regulations, can lead to colossal pitfalls, and ultimately, hefty penalties.In this episode, Reuben rallies in-depth on the potential security risks during transitions, intricate details on termination clauses and contract renewals, and how mergers impact service continuity. He sheds light on the need for professionalism at every step during IT transitions and serves up some strategic advice on ensuring smooth transitions. The episode concludes on a high note, emphasizing trust maintenance with IT firms, and highlighting the critical need for integrated cybersecurity measures in practices.What You'll Learn in This Episode:The vital importance of data and domain name ownershipsThe repercussions of not following HIPAA regulationsThe potential security risks during IT offboardingHow to deal with termination clauses and contract renewalsThe effect of mergers on service continuityThe necessity of cybersecurity in dental practicesCurious yet? Dive right into this week's episode to make sure your offboarding process is smooth and secure!‍For DSO integrations, startup solutions, and all your dental IT needs, let our sponsors, Darkhorse Tech, help out so you can focus on providing the amazing care that you do. For 1 month of FREE service, visit their link today! https://thedentalmarketer.lpages.co/darkhorse-deal/‍You can reach out to Reuben Kamp here:Website: https://www.darkhorsetech.com/Email: admin@darkhorsetech.comPhone: 800-868-4504Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DarkhorseTech‍Mentions and Links: Businesses/Services:ACME ITHenry ScheinOrganizations:HIPAA‍If you want your questions answered on Monday Morning Episodes, ask me on these platforms:My Newsletter: https://thedentalmarketer.lpages.co/newsletter/The Dental Marketer Society Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2031814726927041‍Episode Transcript (Auto-Generated - Please Excuse Errors)‍Michael: Hey, Reuben. So talk to us. What's one piece of advice you can give us this Monday morning. Reuben: We're going to talk about off boardings today, right? It is, uh, something that doesn't come up until, well, you need to find a new it company. And I know there's a lot of anxiety around, my it guy, he's got access to everything.What's going to happen when I sent him the email saying like, ah, I don't want, sorry, man, I'm going in a different direction. today I thought it would be really useful to just, you know, hear from someone you know, like me, who's been in dental it now for 17, 18 years. Uh, I've been running Dark Horse Tech, you know, it for Dentist now for, 12 is uh, today is actually our 12th anniversary.It's crazy. Oh, happy anniversary, Michael: man, Reuben: and thank you man. Yeah, I think it's just one of those things that like no one really talks about and I'd like to kind of demystify the whole process. Michael: Interesting. Okay, so then what can we expect or what should we expect if somebody's transitioning or offboarding from an IT company?Reuben: The most important thing to keep in mind is it's all your stuff. Right. No matter how they word the response to you, no matter what they say, just always have in your mind, I own the server. I own my email address. I own my domain name. I'm just bringing up some things that usually are a part of transitioning from an it company, right?Maybe they have your domain name, right? Which is like, you know, dark horse tech, the dental marketer. com. Let's say they have that stored. You need to get that back. So, number one. You own it all, right? So you get to make the decisions. Now, compliance environment of dental, we all know, HIPAA, right?That also has to be kept in mind. So let's assume in this example, Michael, that it's a, it's an it company that does care about HIPAA, right? Because if they don't, it's going to be a rough go of it. so we have to know, let's talk about liability, right? If you say, Hey, you know, Acme dental it, I'm sorry, we don't need your services any longer.you can't have two I. T. Companies in the system at the same time. there's HIPAA compliance obligations there. There's also just personally as a business owner. If something happened during that, let's let's call it a 30 day transition period. The I. T. Comes here and point their fingers at each other and you're going to be left in the lurch.What can happen Michael: in those 30 days though, like that's, that you've seen? Reuben: So, you know, when you're switching companies, you're, you know, maybe they're, they're removing software that could be the removing security software, leaving those computers vulnerable. So in the time it takes for the software to be removed and the new IT company to install it, that's an area, where you can have security issues.But same thing with backups, right? Let's say it company stopped performing backups when you sent the email and a, you know, dark horse is ready to take over 30 days from now, but something happens in that time. Now you don't have backups. Right. So it's, it's really important to sketch out, um, responsibilities.Now we have a, you know, work for over a thousands, 1077 dental practices. So my process is pretty locked in, but you have to direct the it company on what they need to do, right. Per their, their agreement, you sign an agreement with them. They need to uphold it through the end of. The term that you're paying them.So you have to say, we expect that backups are going to be performed and services through X date. And if you don't do that, then they can really just pull their software whenever they want. So number one thing is at that moment, when you're, you're like, yes, I want to move forward with this other it company, I'm kicking the incumbent out.It's a really great time to think about, minimizing the gap between security products being installed and removed, that's the window for the hackers to get into your system and, and wreak havoc. Michael: if it ever goes longer than 30 days, what's the reasons for that?Reuben: they could have a 60 day termination clause, uh, if it goes even longer than that, you know, we've had scenarios where clients are ready to sign up and then they go and they read their contract with whatever I, you know, we're all month to month, so this is not something that happens in our world.But, uh, you know, I. T. Sometimes there's 135 year contracts. I don't think I've ever really see seen anything longer than five. You know, but you're like, you're motivated to switch and then you forgot that you signed a contract. And then, you know, the guys are usually pretty sneaky about it. And it auto renews, right?So it's like, Oh, Oh, it's up in a month. Oh, nope. It auto renewed another year. You have to wait another year or two. So, that's something also, you know, before you, uh, start interviewing it companies, just make sure that you're not locked into some longterm commitment. but that kind of, you Segways us into what if the company is not providing services, right?Let's say. Brought me into the office. I'm like, wow, your backups haven't ran for three months, And you're in a year long contract with that. That is your way out of it, right? So they breached their contract. That is a way you can terminate early. Um, if they're not living up to that, some, some companies have response time metrics.That's another way out. some companies, uh, there's a lot of merger and acquisition activity. Just like in, in dental and the DSO space, it is the same way. I'm kind of unique in that, like, I own 100 percent of the company and I have no plans on selling it and we're a hundred percent, we have no debt and like, we're all, you know, this is a private company.but you might be in a situation where, uh, you signed a contract with a company, but they sold to another firm. And that company you signed on with no longer exists. So you don't have. There's nothing to hold you to because that company doesn't exist any longer. So there, you know, me and Michael, I can get creative.You know, if you're really unhappy with your IT company, I'm sure, feel free to reach out, even if you're not going with us, I'm probably, I'm sure I can probably help you out. Michael: What have been the biggest headaches that you've experienced and you've seen? When it comes to this op boarding, Reuben: it's professionalism is the number one thing, right?You have all ranges of, characters in this space. You have the 18 year old IT guy, you have the 70 year old IT guy, right? The one man show. Then you have, like, Henry Schein. And then you have everything in between. So, you know, I think the most, Hectic thing is when they take it personally, You know, you submit that cancellation letter and they either, it's usually that they, not that they don't reply, but they be, they kind of shut down and get mad and are not very helpful in the transition.Right. So been through just about every single kind of transition. I've been through the one where the it guy passed away. So we have no passwords. And we just have to figure it out. you know, on another episode, we talked about hackers. Well, there's the black hat, the bad guys, and there's the white hat.Sometimes you got to put on the white hat, you know. Put on the white hat and get into the system so the client can use it. Um, yeah. Michael: Interesting. Reuben: You know, we got, it guys that, uh, left the industry and just like, I don't care. I'm not responding anymore. just about every scenario you know, exists out there, but how it should happen, dear Acme Dental, it, thank you for your years of service.we're making a decision to go in another direction. Attached, uh, to this email is our new IT company. I authorize them to have all of our passwords. We call them run books in this industry, but like all of the information on our account, uh, please initiate this transition in the next 30 days. Sincerely, Dr.Arias. Michael: Yeah. Gotcha. Okay. Interesting. So that's how it should go. It should be smooth, easy transition. Reuben: the doctor, that's your job. That's it. You've done, you've completed it. You've sent the message and now it company talks to it company, things happen, and now you have a new it company, that's how it should go in a normal realm is your responsibility is crafting and sending that message and then the two professional organizations should.Do Michael: you charge for off boarding like extra? Like if we were to be with an IT company and then, you know what I mean? Like I want to go with Dark Horse, but I haven't even reached out to my current IT company because my contract is going to end in like in a month. Reuben: no, I mean, we don't charge for off boarding, right?If a client were to say, Hey, I sold my practice. I don't need your services anymore. We're going with this, you know, DSO as internal IT. We don't have any, I guess the, what the example would be almost like a chart. Transfer fee, like a patient of this doctor wants to go to another practice. You're like, ah, 10 bucks to get your chart over there.it seems as silly as that to charge somebody. And like, you know, I do care about my reputation. so it's like, what is the right thing to do is to just be as professional as possible, during that transition. Michael: Okay. Gotcha. And then how can we tell. IT company doesn't care about HIPAA during their offboarding period.Reuben: Well, I mean, if they stop their services, right, they have, incredible to think about when you give a quote to a dental office, HIPAA is involved in that. What I mean by that is, you've, let's say I go into an office, identify that a backup is not running. The office went out, contacted me. And got a quote for that service.I'm covered. Right. Cause I went in, I did my job. I gave, uh, the office the quote to fix the problem, uh, the compliance hold that they were facing. But in the same token, you're canceling with this company, but they still need to be providing services to the end of the term. for them to say, we have you covered, you're secure, you're HIPAA compliant, we're And if they pull that early, that's a problem.Sometimes it's really hard to know if they do that, right. Cause the software is just like, you know, we look, if we're using a windows computer, our times in the bottom, right. And next that's called the system tray icon. That's kind of where all the little shortcuts live for these, these software programs, if it just, one of those little icons disappears because they deactivated it, you have no idea.So it's really important, though, uh, to make sure that two I. T. Companies they're not in the system at the same time, right? You might want to maybe you hate this I. T. Company so much. You want to get him out of there as soon as possible. The right way to do that is for the new I. T. Company to come on site and remove all of that I.T. Company software and then let that I. T. Company No. Yeah, we're gonna pay you to the end of the term, but you're no longer responsible for protecting us. So that's like the, you got some bile in the back of your throat, just thinking about your it company and you just need to get them out of there.That's probably the way to do it. Michael: If the it company, the one that you're just like, Oh, I hate them fights back or not fights back, but says like, sorry, we can't, is there a reason for them to do that or no? Reuben: It's usually about term. right. They have a contract term. We can't do that because. You're in a contract with a client for a year.You could say, I don't care. I'm going to pay you for the year, but I'm still using this other company. you could still remove their software. any other way they could say now, well, if you hired one of their employees, and they had a clause in their contract that non solicitation clause that might not make them very happy.that usually happens, uh, only at the DSO level, right? Who's going to steal an internal it guide. Michael: Oh, I get you. Right. You said, Oh, and we love Reuben: that technician. We're going to start our own internal it, and we're going to take that guy with us. That happens. Yeah, it does. That's bad business. That is bad business.Uh, please don't do the only other reason they could say no is just, again, we went to the emotional component earlier about being, uh, upset, having an emotional reaction to a client's business decision. And they're just saying no because they're just trying to be obstructionist, right? Yeah, just trying to that's their way.They don't have any other tools to fight back besides just being like, No, I'm not going to help you with this. Michael: Yeah. Okay. Interesting. Awesome. Reuben, I appreciate your time and giving us more insight on offboarding. Now, you mentioned that you guys do this, for free. Well, obviously there's no charge, right?Or anything like that, especially if they want to transition from their IT company to you. Any other advice you want to give us on this?Reuben: you're working with your it company right now, I know we're in this, like, it seems like the era of the big hack, right? If you're happy with your service to your it company, that's awesome. You're in a great position. You should try to keep them, you want a dental office to be happy with their it company, but you also want to subscribe to the trust, but verify, right?They're providing great service, but are they providing the necessary products in your dental office to keep you HIPAA compliant and away from fines in the news and breaches and having to give all your patients, credit monitoring for two years. I mean, take your patient count times nine times two.some of you might not like that number. So if you can pair those two things together, great service and a company that cares about this dental market, cybersecurity, HIPAA compliance, then you're in an awesome position. Michael: Wonderful, man. Awesome. Reuben. I appreciate your time. And if anyone has further questions, where can they find you?Reuben: I'm all over. You can find me on Facebook. I'm always in the, in and out of all those groups. Everyone else's, uh, admin at dark horse tech. com is my direct email. Dark horse tech. com is our website. Of course. Uh, no, I appreciate you bringing me on Michael. Michael: No, yeah. And that's going to be in the show notes below, along with, if you go on the first link in the show notes below, you're going to see an exclusive deal that dark horse tech as for you.So make sure you go check that out. And Reuben, thank you so much for being with me on this Monday morning episode.

Red XIII rides a Chocobo in the lasts Final Fantasy game and that means everything The post BRB UK 583: Segways! appeared first on Big Red Barrel.

For all the emphasis placed on vehicles in games, it's kind of a shame we've never gotten a series about piloting the most impressive contraption of all: the Segway. Sure, there's games like Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth that feature Segways, but I'm talking about a game where Segging is what it's all about.

OpenAI previews Sora, Bard becomes Gemini, 1x robots on Segways, Vision Pro hits the streets, breakthrough medicine, the 40th anniversary of the Macintosh Super Bowl ad, and Transhumanism.

As most of us begrudgingly emerge from the Christmas and new year slumber, the boxing world has been moving at a pace like never before. Its plain to see the Saudi Arabia 'trickle down' effect has been influential in reigniting the imagination of boxing fans all over the world.Irish boxing finished the year with two colossal shows in Dublin - where Katie Taylor managed to reinvent herself and even the score with Northampton girl Chantelle Cameron. Both champions, both icons and both inspiring countless young girls and boys not just in Ireland and the UK - but all over the globe in 2 fights which have truly given us EVERYTHING. Barely a week later Matchroom and Conlan Boxing brought us another live show, this time from Belfast featuring Mick Conlan v Jordan Gill as ther main event and an all Belfast battle between Tyrone McKenna and Lewis Crocker. In this episode Ian and Al look back over both cards as Ian talks about the atmosphere from inside the Three Arena where he watched with baited breath, The lads look over some other recent action for Irish fighters and speculate a little on what we might see in the coming weeks and months.in Association with

Fluent Fiction - Catalan: Navigating Barcelona's Narrow Streets: A Thrilling Adventure of Segways and Skates Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.org/navigating-barcelonas-narrow-streets-a-thrilling-adventure-of-segways-and-skates Story Transcript:Ca: Sota el cel daurat de Barcelona, Jordi sentia l'adrenalina en cada part del seu cos.En: Under the golden sky of Barcelona, Jordi felt the adrenaline rushing through his body.Ca: Estava dret sobre el seu segway flambant nou, l'arròs del dinar encara a la panxa, i la Plaça de Sant Jaume just al davant.En: He stood on his brand new Segway, still full from lunch, with Plaça de Sant Jaume right in front of him.Ca: Podia escoltar el zumzeig constant de les converses a la terrassa del restaurant del costat i els nens jugant a la distància.En: He could hear the constant buzz of conversations on the terrace of the restaurant next to him and children playing in the distance.Ca: Però totes aquelles eren distractions.En: But all of those were distractions.Ca: La seva única missió en aquell moment era navegar pels carrers estrets de la ciutat, una aventura que l'havia cridat desde feia molt temps.En: His only mission in that moment was to navigate the narrow streets of the city, an adventure that had been calling to him for a long time.Ca: Al costat seu, Marta tenia una expressió seriament pensativa al rostre.En: Beside him, Marta had a seriously thoughtful expression on her face.Ca: Amb patins als peus, observava el seu company amb una mica de preocupació.En: With roller skates on her feet, she watched her companion with a bit of worry.Ca: Però també sabia que Jordi estava decidit.En: But she also knew that Jordi was determined.Ca: Així que, amb un sospir compartit, es van posar en marxa.En: So, with a shared sigh, they set off.Ca: Jordi era com una fletxa disparada mentre corria pels carrers estrets.En: Jordi was like a shot arrow as he raced through the narrow streets.Ca: Cada gir i cada curva es convertien en un repte.En: Every turn and curve became a challenge.Ca: Havia aconseguit esquivar un parell de gats escandolosos, desviar-se de les obres d'un carrer, i sobretot, no atropellar a cap vianant.En: He managed to avoid a couple of noisy cats, swerve around roadworks, and most importantly, not run over any pedestrians.Ca: Però el més difícil era Marta, que s'estava quedant enrere a causa dels seus patins que no podien anar tan ràpid com el segway de Jordi.En: But the hardest part was Marta, who was falling behind because her skates couldn't go as fast as Jordi's Segway.Ca: "¡Espere'm, Jordi!En: "Wait for me, Jordi!"Ca: " Podia sentir les seves crides, però no podia deixar de somriure.En: He could hear her calls, but he couldn't stop smiling.Ca: La llibertat de navegar pels carrers era massa embriagadora.En: The freedom of navigating the streets was too intoxicating.Ca: No va ser fins que Marta va caure que la realitat va fer acte de presència.En: It wasn't until Marta fell that reality set in.Ca: Jordi es va girar just a temps per veure-la caure al terra.En: Jordi turned just in time to see her hit the ground.Ca: El seu cor es va aturar.En: His heart stopped.Ca: De sobte, Barcelona ja no era una ciutat d'aventura, sinó una jungla perillosa.En: Suddenly, Barcelona wasn't an adventure city anymore, but a dangerous jungle.Ca: Amb nerviosisme, Jordi va acudir al costat de Marta, ajudant-la a aixecar-se.En: Anxiously, Jordi rushed to Marta's side, helping her up.Ca: Ella estava una mica sacsejada, però amb un somriure valent, va aixecar el dit gros i va declarar: "Estic bé.En: She was a bit shaken, but with a brave smile, she lifted her thumb and declared, "I'm okay."Ca: "Aquell dia, Jordi va aprendre que les aventures no són res sense algú amb qui compartir-les, especialment quan aquesta persona està intentant seguir el teu ritme en patins.En: That day, Jordi learned that adventures are nothing without someone to share them with, especially when that person is trying to keep up with your pace on skates.Ca: Aquesta simple sortida va consolidar la seva amistat de forma inesperada, deixant una petjada imborrable en les seves vides connectades per carrers estrets i el so del segway i els patins fent eco a la ciutat de Barcelona.En: This simple outing unexpectedly solidified their friendship, leaving an indelible mark on their lives connected by narrow streets and the sound of the Segway and skates echoing through the city of Barcelona.Ca: Així que, al final, amb Marta dreta sobre els seus patins escarransits i Jordi sobre el seu segway densament rallat, van tornar cap a casa, riures més forts, el cel daurat donant pas a la nit estrellada.En: So, in the end, with Marta standing on her worn-out skates and Jordi on his heavily scratched Segway, they headed back home, laughter louder, the golden sky giving way to a starry night.Ca: I per a ells, Barcelona semblava més brillant que mai.En: And for them, Barcelona seemed brighter than ever. Vocabulary Words:English: CatalanUnder: Sotagolden: dauratsky: celBarcelona: BarcelonaJordi: Jordifelt: sentiaadrenaline: adrenalinarushing: correntthrough: a través dehis: seubody: cosstood: estava dretbrand new: flambant nouSegway: segwaystill: encarafull: plefrom: delunch: dinarPlaça de Sant Jaume: Plaça de Sant Jaumeright: justin front of: al davant dehim: d'ellcould hear: podia escoltarconstant: constantbuzz: zumzeigof: deconversations: converseson: a laterrace: terrassa

Recovering from head coldsNot sponsors…mucinex…Segways and staff meetingsHooked on fonixAnecdotal evidence logical fallacyCollin went on an adventureChris Hadfield: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_HadfieldHaiku!!Confections aboundRocus laughter shakes the wallsPlates and forks licked cleanCheck out our other episodes: ohbrotherpodcast.comFollow us on InstagramCheck us out on Youtube

On this week's episode we review Paul Blart: Mall Cop, think about buying Segways, James pretends like his computer freezes to ditch us, & Mike steps up to give us the word of the week. Follow, like, comment , or say hi on Instagram. @criticallyashamedpod @thefinnomenon @jimmyjamesjimjam @mlevass91

Think we've all asked ourselves this question at some point! But I do think now there's a message everywhere that break-ups should happen immediately if your partner isn't 'perfect'. I found a thread online by Dr. Nicole LePera (@the.holistic.psychologist) and thought I'd share it as I loved the different narrative and thought it might actually be helpful for some people! overview of the thread below. Don't worry, we keep it light too with the usual Segways :) let me know your thoughts as always and please make sure you're sharing and following etc! Thanks so much

¿Te has cruzado alguna vez con alguien que parece vivir en el año 3022 pero luce absolutamente ridículo en el presente? Si es así, este episodio de "Conexiones Cotidianas" es el que no te puedes perder. Nos sumergimos en el fenómeno del "Techno Cringe", esos momentos embarazosos protagonizados por entusiastas de la tecnología que llevan su amor por lo "nuevo" demasiado lejos. Desde los primeros adoptantes de Segways que pretendían ser el futuro del transporte, hasta los "Glassholes" que creen que las gafas de realidad virtual son el accesorio definitivo para salir a la calle. Todo esto y más en un episodio que te hará reír, reflexionar, y quizás sentir un poco de vergüenza ajena. No digas que no te lo advertimos. Puedes buscarme por redes sociales con @olivernabani, y puedes encontrarme habitualmente en Twitch: http://twitch.tv/olivernabaniAdemás si quieres participar en la comunidad mashain, tenemos un server de Discord donde compartimos nuestras inquietudes: https://discord.gg/7M2SEfbFY por supuesto lo más importante, recuerda:No se dice Machine, se dice Mashain

Gianna may be in the middle of her friend's relationship! Joe wants to buy a segway. The girl's don't think this is a good idea. & moe

A globetrotting episode, as the lads head around Bavaria on Segways, including a trip to the legendary FUNtainment, Hofbräuhaus, and Neuschwanstein Castle. Then we get some mucky fun in with Dirty Pig (or Drecksau) from Kosmos, look back at reMEmber from Pegasus Spiele, become one with nature with Happy Bee from Helvetiq and Coiledspring Games, and annoy all the right people with the Barbie movie. All that, plus a farewell to underwear, on Ep182. 00:00 - An international flavour 03:55 - Hofbräuhaus, Neuschwanstein Castle, and Segways in Bavaria 26:10 - a trip to FUNtainment 33:40 - Dirty Pig or Drecksau 38:22 - reMEmber 44:49 - Happy Bee 48:52 - the Barbie movie On this episode were Kris (@DigitalStrider), Peter (@XeroXeroXero) and Sam (@MrSamTurner). Our Spotify Playlist brings together lots of great thematic music inspired by the stuff we talk about. Links to where you can find us - StayingInPodcast.com Note: sometimes we'll have been sent a review copy of the thing we're talking about on the podcast. It doesn't skew how we think about that thing, and we don't receive compensation for anything we discuss, but we thought you might like to know this is the case.

Robert, Paul and Mike have a Bone to pick with people who bring snacks but not to share, cabs that smell unbearable, cops on scooters or Segways plus top notch Fan Bones! Bone to Pick Podcast starring Robert Kelly & Paul Virzi Join our new Patreon for bonus weekly Fan Bone Episodes & early release of the podcast: www.patreon.com/bonetopickcast Follow the show! https://linktr.ee/bonetopickcast EMAIL US YOUR BONES: bonetopickcast@gmail.com 

Grab your embroidery, it's time to party as we cover the 2020 mini-series ‘The Ghost Bride'. It's the Colonial Malacca drama that has it all; eyebrow wigs, ghosts on Segways and outfits to literally die for.Sound Engineer: Keith NagleEditor: Keith NagleProducer: Helen Hamilton

This week Be a Man, John Fiore and Tonzo talk about chainsaws, Old school machinists, Getting mangled in a machinery, Respecting the machine, Hand crafted goods, Working on an assembly line, Stop and shop Robots, Boston Dynamics, Answering machines, Cyborgs, Frozen brains, Teddy Ruxpin, Amusement parks, Carnival rides, Yard Machines, Power tools, Construction machines, Jet packs, Killing machines, Cell Phones, VR life, Sex Machines, Segways and shaving SHOP: http://www.Bostonbeaman.com EVERYTHING BE A MAN: http://www.direct.me/bostonbeaman

Rich and Gaz comb over the WTAF moments of the past two weeks, including Perry actress Kathy Burke totally misunderstanding the term "Woke", The Church gets Segways, Gaz tells us what he would do if he had a time machine and Nike get on in the Transgender Agenda Wars. Video Version out Free every Saturday 10am Here: https://ickonic.com/Browse40% Off everything in the Store at Supreme CBD: https://supremecbd.ukOfficial WTAF Website: https://www.wtafpodcast.co.uk

This week the boys sit down and talk about: St. Pattys day, Atomic Walrus, Pluto the planet, Howler honey, Rehearsing, Segways, Soundbetter, Dexy, Mark Gallup, Nashville, Tracks, Practice, Mini Cooper, Run Flat Tires, Loan Forgiveness, Last of us, The Leftovers, and much much more.

This week, Chad & Cy are joined by the hilarious Kelsey Cook (@KelseyCookComedy) who just performed on The Tonight Show and has a new comedy special coming out on YouTube this week! This episode of Middle of Somewhere is brought to you by Green Chef & BetterHelp! --- Follow us on Instagram! Chad Daniels (@ThatChadDaniels) is a Dad, Comedian, and pancake lover. With over 750 million streams of his 5 albums to date, his audio plays are in the 99th percentile in comedy and music on Pandora alone, averaging over 1MM per week. Chad's previous album, Footprints on the Moon was the most streamed comedy album of 2017, and he has 6 late-night appearances and a Comedy Central Half Hour under his belt. Cy Amundson (@CyAmundson) With appearances on Conan, Adam Devine's House Party, and Comedy Central's This is Not Happening, Cy Amundson is fast-proving himself in the world of standup comedy. After cutting his teeth at Acme Comedy Company in Minneapolis, has since appeared on Family Guy and American Dad and as a host on ESPN's SportsCenter on Snapchat. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Welcome back listeners, this week we start off by discussing the latest Shazam: Fury of Gods with a more mature tone this time around, another terribly placed rap song and wonky cgi? Up next, we talk about how AI is taking over and changing how original movies are seen and look. Next, we talk about how Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey and the creators receiving death threats and Peter Pan: Neverland Nightmare in the works. We talk the goods and bad of social media with twitter removing 12 year old actress, Ryan Kiera Armstrong , from the worst actress category at the Razzies. Next, we discuss Justin Roiland being cut from his shows due to domestic abuse charges and that Rick and Morty will go on without him. Then out of the blue, Ernie brings up how people are selling water from the now closed Splash Mountain?! Next, Michael Cudlitz joins the cast of Superman & Lois as Lex Luthor. Lastly, Violent Night 2 is officially in the works which Segways perfectly into our See It or Skip It with another David Harbour film, We Have a Ghost. Do you have questions, topics, or movie recommendations for us?? Tweet us @watchfultweet or #watchclosely, we love talking movies online and we'll discuss any related topic or questions on the show. Have a great week! --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/watchclosely/support

Google Plus, Segways, Clubhouse, and other things that should've been big

Segways have gained a lot of popularity in the recent year, becoming one of the best ways for getting around a city or a town, for doing tours and a lot more. In today's podcast, I'm going to be talking about Segway tour and why you should try it.  Key PointsWhat is a Segway?Segway Tours and RentalsAre Segway Kid-Friendly?About Marina 'Travel Experta'I am an Experience Collector, World Traveler, Expat Mama and WifeI have been an expat for over 20 years, raising 2 trilingual sonsMy family and I have traveled to over 40 countries and counting …I'm here to inspire you to travel, move internationally, have fun with your family and so much more! Did you enjoy the podcast?Leave a review on Apple Podcast! They are one of THE most important factors for podcasts, and it's super easy to do: Click on “View in iTunes” on the left-hand side under the picture. Leave an honest review.Thanks, you're super!

Today Mike, Pam, and Rikki take a show to just celebrate Epcot at 40 years old! We all three love this very unique theme park and today spend some time sharing our personal favorite memories from times spent here. From "Where's the Fire?" and "The Great Piggy Bank Adventure" to riding Segways, spending New Years Eve with half the planet, seeing special fireworks and parades and much more, we hope you can connect some of your memories over the years with those we share today! We hope you enjoy today's show!  Please visit our website at www.beourguestpodcast.com.  Thank you so much for your support of our podcast! Become a Patron of the show at www.Patreon.com/BeOurGuestPodcast.  Also, please follow the show on Twitter @BeOurGuestMike and on Facebook at www.facebook.com/beourguestpodcast.   Thanks to our friends at The Magic For Less Travel for sponsoring today's podcast!

There's been a massive proliferation of micro-transportation devices in recent years. Everything from Segways and electric skateboards to Onewheels and e-scooters. But as cool as some of those futuristic devices are, none of them hold a candle to the ultimate classic- the bicycle. Advances in technology have made bikes lighter, safer, and easier to repair, but the basic bicycle remains unchanged and is still the most affordable and dependable personal transportation device. And we've seen similar changes when it comes to what it means to be an investor. There really are a ton of crappy investments out there and the spread of not-so-awesome investment advice has been on the rise as well. It's a constantly changing space and there are a wider range of options available as well as ‘gurus' telling us how we should be investing. These fancy options can throw us off our game and so we wanted to make sure that you're able to cultivate and embody the characteristics of a great investor so that you'll be able to make wise decisions with your investments.   Want more How To Money in your life? Here are some additional ways to get ahead with your personal finances: Knowing your ‘money gear' is a crucial part of your personal finance journey. Start here.  Sign up for the weekly HTM newsletter. It's fun, free, & practical. Find a thriving community of fellow money nerds by joining the HTM Facebook group! Maximize your rewards by getting the best credit card for how you spend. Massively reduce your cell phone bill each month by switching to a discount provider like Mint Mobile. Don't be cheap and forego getting a life insurance policy. Compare rates with Policygenius.   During this episode we enjoyed a Oktoberfest by Dry County Brewing! And please help us to spread the word by letting friends and family know about How To Money! Hit the share button, subscribe if you're not already a regular listener, and give us a quick review in Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. Help us to change the conversation around personal finance and get more people doing smart things with their money!   Best friends out!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We're taking a look at personal transporters, and we don't me things like boring old cars! Think about the travel of the future, or at least that looks like it is from the future. Segways, the Halfbike, eFOLDi, hover boards and more! We don't just talk about the future, of course, but we look at the past to see how personal transporters got to where they are today, starting back in 1915 with the Autoped. In addition, we look at some of the technology that is used to make these contraptions function, like battery technology, brushless motors, self-balancing wheel sensors, and gyroscopes.