Podcast appearances and mentions of julia evans

Have you ever wondered what a near-death experience is like? Julia Evans can tell you. She's heard the whispered questions and seen the quizzical looks, and now she's sharing the full story of the day that transformed Julia Evans into The Lily Nurse.See the experience through her eyes as it loops, turns, and links back together, illuminating a journey like no other. Immerse yourself in her story as she shares the details of the day that changed her forever, what came before, and how it set her forth on a new path.Read how she steps out of the shadows she was placed into, and learn how truly empowering it is for one's self to finally be heard. For finding your voice has its own power in healing. When you are heard, you are able to heal at all levels—mind, body and spirit.BioJulia Evan's background is in western medicine; she has a Bachelor of Science in Nursing and was a Registered Nurse for more than a decade. Only after years of suffering with Multiple Sclerosis and being faced with a traumatic near-death experience did she finally and truly open her heart and mind towards the notion of holistic healing and energy medicine. As Julia immersed herself into learning about what she believed to be a new age form of healing, she began searching for an understanding of what it is and what she is actually capable of. She found a modality that really spoke to her and through that became a Certified BodyTalk Practitioner.This modality fuelled her passion and interest towards a journey of self healing and the ability to help others find their missing voice within themselves— to help find the root cause and underlying components that hold people back from truly healing. It has given her a new perspective on what “healing” is. As she continues to broaden her knowledge and develop an even better understanding of the essence of BodyTalk, she now is able to view a person as a whole and focus on the priorities of what each individual needs to heal instead of defining them by their illness or disease. Julia Evans is the loving mother of two, and is happily married to the love of her life and soulmate. Julia lives in the Land of the Living Skies and always has her eyes on the horizon, to endless possibilities.Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thelilynurseFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/thelilynursehttps://www.amazon.com/dp/B085FWFL3C https://www.pastliveshypnosis.co.uk/https://www.patreon.com/ourparanormalafterlifeMy book 'Verified Near Death Experiences' https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DXKRGDFP

Near-death experience guest 1456 is Julia Evans, nurse who died on the job and had a near death experience.The Lily Nurse: Rebooted/Re-birthed and Finding a New Pathhttps://amzn.to/3EjuNoDJulia's Youtube Chanelhttps://www.youtube.com/@-thelilynurseCONTACT:Email: jeff@jeffmarapodcast.comTo donate crypto:Bitcoin - bc1qk30j4n8xuusfcchyut5nef4wj3c263j4nw5wydDigibyte - DMsrBPRJqMaVG8CdKWZtSnqRzCU7t92khEShiba - 0x0ffE1bdA5B6E3e6e5DA6490eaafB7a6E97DF7dEeDoge - D8ZgwmXgCBs9MX9DAxshzNDXPzkUmxEfAVEth. - 0x0ffE1bdA5B6E3e6e5DA6490eaafB7a6E97DF7dEeXRP - rM6dp31r9HuCBDtjR4xB79U5KgnavCuwenWEBSITEwww.jeffmarapodcast.comSOCIALS:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jeffmarapodcast/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jeffmarapodcast/Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/jeffmaraP/The opinions of the guests may or may not reflect the opinions of the host.

Have you ever wondered what a near-death experience is like? Julia Evans can tell you. She's heard the whispered questions and seen the quizzical looks, and now she's sharing the full story of the day that transformed Julia Evans into The Lily Nurse.See the experience through her eyes as it loops, turns, and links back together, illuminating a journey like no other. Immerse yourself in her story as she shares the details of the day that changed her forever, what came before, and how it set her forth on a new path.Read how she steps out of the shadows she was placed into, and learn how truly empowering it is for one's self to finally be heard. For finding your voice has its own power in healing. When you are heard, you are able to heal at all levels—mind, body and spirit. BioJulia Evan's background is in western medicine; she has a Bachelor of Science in Nursing and was a Registered Nurse for more than a decade. Only after years of suffering with Multiple Sclerosis and being faced with a traumatic near-death experience did she finally and truly open her heart and mind towards the notion of holistic healing and energy medicine. As Julia immersed herself into learning about what she believed to be a new age form of healing, she began searching for an understanding of what it is and what she is actually capable of. She found a modality that really spoke to her and through that became a Certified BodyTalk Practitioner.This modality fuelled her passion and interest towards a journey of self healing and the ability to help others find their missing voice within themselves— to help find the root cause and underlying components that hold people back from truly healing. It has given her a new perspective on what “healing” is. As she continues to broaden her knowledge and develop an even better understanding of the essence of BodyTalk, she now is able to view a person as a whole and focus on the priorities of what each individual needs to heal instead of defining them by their illness or disease. Julia Evans is the loving mother of two, and is happily married to the love of her life and soulmate. Julia lives in the Land of the Living Skies and always has her eyes on the horizon, to endless possibilities.Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thelilynurseFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/thelilynursehttps://www.amazon.com/dp/B085FWFL3C https://www.pastliveshypnosis.co.uk/https://www.patreon.com/ourparanormalafterlifeMy book 'Verified Near Death Experiences' https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DXKRGDFP

This week, we discuss the return of command line tools, Kubernetes embracing VMs, and the steady march of Windows. Plus, thoughts on TSA, boots, and the “old country." Watch the YouTube Live Recording of Episode (https://www.youtube.com/live/W0_6hPybAsQ?si=QfWLvts-ueyATxtz) 528 (https://www.youtube.com/live/W0_6hPybAsQ?si=QfWLvts-ueyATxtz) Runner-up Titles Pool Problems Stockholm Pool Syndrome The Old Country VMs aren't going anywhere Vaya con Dios This is why we have milk Why's he talking about forks? Commander Claude The Columbia Music House business plan Beat this horse into glue Reinvent Command Line “Man falls in love with CLI” Windows is always giving you the middle button CBT - Claude Behavioral Therapy. Rundown TSA tests security lines allowing passengers to keep their shoes on (https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2025/07/08/tsa-shoe-policy-airport-security/) KubeCon Is Starting To Sound a Lot Like VMCon (https://thenewstack.io/kubecon-is-starting-to-sound-a-lot-like-vmcon/?link_source=ta_bluesky_link&taid=6866ce8d6b59ab0001f28d23&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=bluesky) Claude Code and the CLI Gemini CLI: your open-source AI agent (https://blog.google/technology/developers/introducing-gemini-cli-open-source-ai-agent/) Cursor launches a web app to manage AI coding agents (https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/30/cursor-launches-a-web-app-to-manage-ai-coding-agents/) AI Tooling, Evolution and The Promiscuity of Modern Developers (https://redmonk.com/sogrady/2025/07/09/promiscuity-of-modern-developers/) Introducing OpenCLI (https://patriksvensson.se/posts/2025/07/introducing-open-cli) Windows Windows 11 has finally overtaken Windows 10 as the most used desktop OS (https://www.theverge.com/news/699161/microsoft-windows-11-usage-milestone-windows-10) Microsoft quietly implies Windows has LOST millions of users since Windows 11 debut — are people really abandoning ship? [UPDATE] (https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/windows-11-10-lost-400-million-users-3-years) Relevant to your Interests Public cloud becomes a commodity (https://www.infoworld.com/article/4011196/public-cloud-becomes-a-commodity.html?utm_date=20250625131623&utm_campaign=InfoWorld%20US%20%20All%20Things%20Cloud&utm_content=slotno-1-title-Public%20cloud%20becomes%20a%20commodity&utm_term=Infoworld%20US%20Editorial%20Newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Adestra&aid=29276237&huid=) Nvidia Ruffles Tech Giants With Move Into Cloud Computing (https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/nvidia-dgx-cloud-computing-28c49748?mod=hp_lead_pos11) Which Coding Assistants Retain Their Customers and Which Ones Don't (https://www.theinformation.com/articles/coding-assistants-retain-customers-ones?utm_source=ti_app&rc=giqjaz) Anthropic destroyed millions of print books to build its AI models (https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/06/anthropic-destroyed-millions-of-print-books-to-build-its-ai-models/) Sam Altman upstages the critics (https://www.platformer.news/sam-altman-hard-fork-live/?ref=platformer-newsletter) The Ultimate Cloud Security Championship | 12 Months × 12 Challenges (https://cloudsecuritychampionship.com/) Denmark to tackle deepfakes by giving people copyright to their own features (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/27/deepfakes-denmark-copyright-law-artificial-intelligence) Why Automattic CEO Matt Mullenweg went to war over WordPress (https://overcast.fm/+AAQLdsK48uM) How Nintendo locked down the Switch 2's USB-C port and broke third-party docking (https://www.theverge.com/report/695915/switch-2-usb-c-third-party-docks-dont-work-authentication-encryption) CoreWeave to acquire Core Scientific in $9 billion all-stock deal (https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/07/coreweave-core-scientific-stock-acquisition.html) Valve conquered PC gaming. What comes next? (https://www.ft.com/content/f4a13716-838a-43da-853b-7c31ac17192c) Datadog stock jumps 10% on tech company's inclusion in S&P 500 index (https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/02/datadog-stock-jumps-sp-500-index-inclusion.html) Jack Dorsey just released a Bluetooth messaging app that doesn't need the internet (https://www.engadget.com/apps/jack-dorsey-just-released-a-bluetooth-messaging-app-that-doesnt-need-the-internet-191023870.html) Unlock the Full Chainguard Containers Catalog – Now with a Catalog Pricing Option (https://www.chainguard.dev/unchained/unlock-the-full-chainguard-containers-catalog-now-with-a-catalog-pricing-option) Oracle stock jumps after $30 billion annual cloud deal revealed in filing (https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/30/oracle-orcl-stock-cloud-deal.html) Docker State of App Dev: AI (https://www.docker.com/blog/docker-state-of-app-dev-ai/) X Chief Says She Is Leaving the Social Media Platform (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/09/technology/linda-yaccarino-x-steps-down.html) Meta's recruiting blitz claims three OpenAI researchers (https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/25/metas-recruiting-blitz-claims-three-openai-researchers/) OpenAI Reportedly Shuts Down for a Week as Zuck Poaches Its Top Talent (https://gizmodo.com/openai-reportedly-shuts-down-for-a-week-as-zuck-poaches-its-top-talent-2000622145?utm_source=tldrnewsletter) OpenAI Leadership Responds to Meta Offers: ‘Someone Has Broken Into Our Home' (https://www.wired.com/story/openai-meta-leadership-talent-rivalry/) Sam Altman Slams Meta's AI Talent-Poaching Spree: ‘Missionaries Will Beat Mercenaries' (https://www.wired.com/story/sam-altman-meta-ai-talent-poaching-spree-leaked-messages/) Report: Apple looked into building its own AWS competitor (https://9to5mac.com/2025/07/03/report-apple-looked-into-building-its-own-aws-competitor/) Cloudflare launches a marketplace that lets websites charge AI bots for scraping (https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/01/cloudflare-launches-a-marketplace-that-lets-websites-charge-ai-bots-for-scraping/) The Open-Source Software Saving the Internet From AI Bot Scrapers (https://www.404media.co/the-open-source-software-saving-the-internet-from-ai-bot-scrapers/) Nonsense After 8 years of playing D&D nonstop, I've finally tried its biggest alternative (https://www.polygon.com/tabletop-games/610875/dnd-alternative-dungeon-crawl-classics-old-school) TSA tests security lines allowing passengers to keep their shoes on (https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2025/07/08/tsa-shoe-policy-airport-security/) Conferences Sydney Wizdom Meet-Up (https://www.wiz.io/events/sydney-wizdom-meet-up-aug-2025), Sydney, August 7. Matt will be there. SpringOne (https://www.vmware.com/explore/us/springone?utm_source=organic&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=cote), Las Vegas, August 25th to 28th, 2025. See Coté's pitch (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_xOudsmUmk). Explore 2025 US (https://www.vmware.com/explore/us?utm_source=organic&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=cote), Las Vegas, August 25th to 28th, 2025. See Coté's pitch (https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-COoeIJcFN4). SREDay London (https://sreday.com/2025-london-q3/), Coté speaking, September 18th and 19th. Civo Navigate London (https://www.civo.com/navigate/london/2025), Coté speaking, September 30th. Texas Linux Fest (https://2025.texaslinuxfest.org), Austin, October 3rd to 4th. CFP closes August 3rd (https://www.papercall.io/txlf2025). CF Day EU (https://events.linuxfoundation.org/cloud-foundry-day-europe/), Frankfurt, October 7th, 2025. AI for the Rest of Us (https://aifortherestofus.live/london-2025), Coté speaking, October 15th to 16th, London. SDT News & Community Join our Slack community (https://softwaredefinedtalk.slack.com/join/shared_invite/zt-1hn55iv5d-UTfN7mVX1D9D5ExRt3ZJYQ#/shared-invite/email) Email the show: questions@softwaredefinedtalk.com (mailto:questions@softwaredefinedtalk.com) Free stickers: Email your address to stickers@softwaredefinedtalk.com (mailto:stickers@softwaredefinedtalk.com) Follow us on social media: Twitter (https://twitter.com/softwaredeftalk), Threads (https://www.threads.net/@softwaredefinedtalk), Mastodon (https://hachyderm.io/@softwaredefinedtalk), LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/company/software-defined-talk/), BlueSky (https://bsky.app/profile/softwaredefinedtalk.com) Watch us on: Twitch (https://www.twitch.tv/sdtpodcast), YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi3OJPV6h9tp-hbsGBLGsDQ/featured), Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/softwaredefinedtalk/), TikTok (https://www.tiktok.com/@softwaredefinedtalk) Book offer: Use code SDT for $20 off "Digital WTF" by Coté (https://leanpub.com/digitalwtf/c/sdt) Sponsor the show (https://www.softwaredefinedtalk.com/ads): ads@softwaredefinedtalk.com (mailto:ads@softwaredefinedtalk.com) Recommendations Brandon: Park ATX Free Parking Codes (https://www.austintexas.gov/page/park-atx): FREE15ATX1 and FREE15ATX2 Matt: Careless People (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Careless_People) Coté: Wizard Zines bundle (https://wizardzines.com/zines/all-the-zines/), Julia Evans. Photo Credits Header (https://unsplash.com/photos/grayscale-photo-of-airplane-on-airport-OxJ6RftLbEA)

Julia Evans “We want people to ask these questions,” says Julia Evans, Group Operations Director at TXO. “This gives our customers and partners a real indication of what they're actually doing in real time.” In a new episode of Technology Reseller News, Publisher Doug Green speaks with Julia Evans of TXO about a groundbreaking sustainability initiative: the TXO Carbon Calculator. Developed in partnership with the Carbon Trust, the calculator gives telecom operators and enterprises a powerful tool to measure the carbon savings of reusing, refurbishing, and recycling network equipment instead of buying new. TXO, a global technology lifecycle partner, helps service providers extend the life of their assets by decommissioning, repairing, reselling, and responsibly recycling telecom infrastructure. As Evans explains, with the continued move to the cloud and digital transformation accelerating, there's a surge in decommissioned equipment—and a massive opportunity to manage it sustainably. The Carbon Calculator is now available through TXO's iTrack portal and provides customers with validated, downloadable data on carbon savings. In some cases, using refurbished components rather than new ones can reduce emissions by up to 93%. Evans emphasized that the methodology is rigorous and backed by the Carbon Trust, ensuring customers can confidently use this data in sustainability reports and procurement planning. In a telecom environment where sustainability is becoming a key procurement driver, TXO's offering stands out—not just for reducing emissions, but for making those savings measurable, reportable, and impactful. TXO is also expanding in North America following the acquisition of Airway Group, further growing its reach and ability to support circular economy practices globally. Learn more at: https://www.txo.com

Our Burning Planet is the Daily Maverick section devoted to expert environmental opinion and analysis. We partner up each Friday on the Afternoon Drive to discuss a burning issue. This week, we speak to Julia Evans, Daily Maverick writer, about Solar power being the only viable solution for South Africa.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Guest Alexander Petros Panelist Richard Littauer Show Notes Join host Richard Littauer as he dives into the world of open source sustainability with Alexander Petros, core maintainer of htmx and freelance software engineer. Today, they explore the evolution of HTML, the power of lightweight web protocols, and the broader implications of open-source software for the future of the web. Alexander shares his insights on building sustainable digital infrastructure, using simple tools effectively, and rethinking web development paradigms. Hit download now! [00:01:40] Alexander explains htmx as a lightweight front-end JavaScript library enhancing HTML capabilities. [00:03:16] There's a discussion about HTML's design for behavior and interactivity and a comparison of traditional HTML with modern practices, including JavaScript-heavy frameworks. [00:05:50] We hear the origins of htmx, how it started as a jQuery extension called intercooler.js, and the evolution during the pandemic to a standalone library. [00:09:16] Alexander explains building for the long term, why lightweight, adaptable systems matter, and reflects on the durability of early web standards and tools. [00:12:17] Richard inquires about what Alexander envisions a hundred years from now with htmx. [00:14:57] Balancing simplicity and scalability is discussed about HTML's capabilities for large-scale applications and why many developers overcomplicate solutions unnecessarily. [00:17:40] Alexander critiques over-reliance on tools like Docker and large-scale build systems and advocates for simpler development environments like SQLite. [00:19:42] Alexander talks about why open source frameworks like React solve organizational problems for tech giants. [00:25:42] Richard tells us he's been spending time on the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature as a foundational system for species classification and Alexander speaks about the challenges of contributing to protocols governed by large corporations and why HTML remains a uniquely sustainable and universal platform. [00:28:22] Richard asks Alexander if he's thought about the 1000 year approach to the work he's doing. [00:32:21] Find out where you can follow Alexander and his blog online. Quotes [00:13:11] “The web is going to be the most effective delivery mechanism for software for the next couple of decades.” [00:14:12] “If we look at the tools that we have available today, which tools can we use that are most likely to get us to that fifty, hundred year useful piece of software?” [00:24:06] “Different structural project models produce very different software.” Spotlight [00:33:11] Richard's spotlight is the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. [00:34:07] Alexander's spotlight is better-sqlite3. Links SustainOSS (https://sustainoss.org/) podcast@sustainoss.org (mailto:podcast@sustainoss.org) richard@sustainoss.org (mailto:richard@sustainoss.org) SustainOSS Discourse (https://discourse.sustainoss.org/) SustainOSS Mastodon (https://mastodon.social/tags/sustainoss) Open Collective-SustainOSS (Contribute) (https://opencollective.com/sustainoss) Richard Littauer Socials (https://www.burntfen.com/2023-05-30/socials) Alexander Petros Website (https://alexanderpetros.com/) Alexander Petros LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/apetros/) Unplanned Obsolescence (Alexander's Blog) (https://unplannedobsolescence.com/) Building the Hundred-Year Web Service with htmx- Alexander Petros (YouTube) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lASLZ9TgXyc) htmx (https://htmx.org/) Sustain Podcast-Episode 238: Julia Evans and Wizard Zines (https://podcast.sustainoss.org/238) xkcd-927: How Standards Proliferate (https://xkcd.com/927/) Julia Evans Blog (https://jvns.ca/) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) (https://www.iczn.org/) better-sqlite3 (https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3) Credits Produced by Richard Littauer (https://www.burntfen.com/) Edited by Paul M. Bahr at Peachtree Sound (https://www.peachtreesound.com/) Show notes by DeAnn Bahr Peachtree Sound (https://www.peachtreesound.com/) Special Guest: Alexander Petros.

Dans cet épisde en audio et en vidéo (youtube.com/lescastcodeurs), Guillaume et Emmanuel discutent des 15 ans de Go, d'une nouvelle approche de garbage collecting, de LLMs dans les applications Java, dobservabilité, d'une attaque de chaine d'approvisionnement via javac et d'autres choses. Enregistré le 13 décembre 2024 Téléchargement de l'épisode LesCastCodeurs-Episode-319.mp3 News Langages Go fête son 15ème anniversaire ! https://go.dev/blog/15years discute les 15 ans la corrections de gotchas dans les for loops (notamment les variables étaient loop scoped) le fait que la compile echoue si on attend une version de go superieure seulement depuis go 1.21 en parallele de la gestion de la chaine d'outil (c'est en 2023 seulement!) opt-in telemetrie aussi recent Construire OpenJDK à partir des sources sur macOS https://www.morling.dev/blog/building-openjdk-from-source-on-macos/ de maniere surprenante ce n'est pas tres compliqué Papier sur l'aproche Mark-scavenge pour un ramasse miette https://inside.java/2024/11/22/mark-scavenge-gc/ papier de recherche utiliser l'accessibilité pour preuve de vie n'est pas idéal: un objet peut etre atteignable mais ne sera jamais accedé par le programme les regions les plus pauvres en objets vivant voient leurs objets bouger dans uen autre region et la regio libéré, c'est le comportement classique des GC deux methodes: mark evaguate qui le fait en deux temps et la liveness peut evoluer ; et scavenge qui bouge l'objet vivant des sa decouverte ont fait tourner via ZGC des experience pour voir les objects consideres vivants et bougés inutilement. resultats montrent un gros taux d'objets bougés de maniere inutile proposent un algo different ils marquent les objets vivants mais ne les bougent pas avant le prochain GC pour leur donner une change de devenir unreachable elimine beaucoup de deplacement inutiles vu que les objets deviennent non accessible en un cycle de GC jusquà 91% de reduction ! Particulierement notable dans les machines chargées en CPU. Les tokens d'accès court ou longs https://grayduck.mn/2023/04/17/refresh-vs-long-lived-access-tokens/ pourquoi des long access tokens (gnre refresh token) sont utilises pour des short lived dans oauth 2.0 refresh token simplifient la revocation: vu que seul le auth serveur a a verifier la révocation et les clients vérifient l'expiration et la validité de la signature refresh token ne sont envoyés que entre endpoints alors que les access tokens se baladent pas mal: les frontières de confiance ne sont pas traversées refresh token comme utilise infréquement, et donc peut etre protegee dans une enclave les changements de grants sont plus simple tout en restant distribuable histoire des access refresh token et access token permet de mieux tracer les abus / attaques les inconvenients: c'est plus compliqué en flow, the auth serveur est un SPOF amis mitigeable Java Advent est de retour https://www.javaadvent.com/calendar backstage Java integrite par defaut (et ses consequences sur l'ecosysteme) timefold (sovler) Les extensions JUNit 5 OpenTelemetry via Java Agent vs Micrometer analyse statique de code CQRS et les fonctionalités modernes de Java java simple (sans compilatrion, sans objet fullstack dev with quarkus as backend José Paumard introduit et explique les Gatherers dans Java 24 dans cette vidéo https://inside.java/2024/11/26/jepcafe23/ Librairies Micronaut 4.7, avec l'intégration de LangChain4j https://micronaut.io/2024/11/14/micronaut-framework-4-7-0-released/ Combiner le framework de test Spock et Cucumber https://www.sfeir.dev/back/spock-framework-revolutionnez-vos-tests-unitaires-avec-la-puissance-du-bdd-et-de-cucumber/ les experts peuvent écrire leurs tests au format Gherkin (de Cucumber) et les développeurs peuvent implémenter les assertions correspondantes avec l'intégration dans Spock, pour des tests très lisibles Spring 6.2 https://spring.io/blog/2024/11/14/spring-framework-6-2-0-available-now beans @Fallback améliorations sur SpELet sur le support de tests support de l'echape des property placeholders une initioalisation des beans en tache de fond nouvelle et pleins d'autres choses encore Comment créer une application Java LLM tournant 100% en Java avec Jlama https://quarkus.io/blog/quarkus-jlama/ blog de Mario Fusco, Mr API et Java et Drools utilise jlama + quarkus + langchain Explique les avantage de l'approche pure Java comme le cycle de vie unique, tester les modeles rapidement, securite (tout est in process), monolithe ahahah, observabilité simplifiée, distribution simplifiée (genre appli embarquée) etc Vert.x 5 en seconde incubation https://vertx.io/blog/eclipse-vert-x-5-candidate-2-released/ Support des Java modules (mais beacoup des modules vert.x eux-même ne le supportent pas support io_uring dans vert.x core le load balancing côté client le modele des callbacks n'est plus supporté, vive les Futur beaucoup d'améliorations autour de gRPC et d'autres choses Un article sur Spring AI et la multi modalite audio https://spring.io/blog/2024/12/05/spring-ai-audio-modality permet de voir les evolutions des APIs de Spring AI s'appluie sur les derniers modeles d'open ai des examples comme par exemple un chatbot voix et donc comment enregistrer la voix et la passer a OpenAI Comment activer le support experimental HTTP/3 dans Spring Boot https://spring.io/blog/2024/11/26/http3-in-reactor-2024 c'ets Netty qui fait le boulot puis Spring Netty l'article décrit les etapes pour l'utiliser dans vos applis Spring Boot ou Spring Cloud Gateway l'article explique aussi le cote client (app cliente) ce qui est sympa Infrastructure Un survol des offres d'observabilité http://blog.ippon.fr/2024/11/18/observabilite-informatique-comprendre-les-bases-2eme-partie/ un survol des principales offres d'observabilité Open source ou SaaS et certains outsiders Pas mal pour commencer à défricher ce qui vous conviendrait blog de ippon Web Sortie de Angular 19 https://blog.ninja-squad.com/2024/11/19/what-is-new-angular-19.0/ stabilité des APIs Signal APIs migration automatique vers signals composants standalone par défaut nouvelles APIs linkedSignal et resource de grosses améliorations de SSR et HMR un article également de Sfeir sur Angular 19 https://www.sfeir.dev/front/angular-19-tout-ce-quil-faut-savoir-sur-les-innovations-majeures-du-framework/ Angluar 19 https://www.sfeir.dev/front/angular-19-tout-ce-quil-faut-savoir-sur-les-innovations-majeures-du-framework/ composant standalone par default (limiter les problemes de dependances), peut le mettre en strict pour le l'imposer (ou planter) signalement des imports inutilisés @let pour les variables locales dans les templates linkedSignal (experimental) pour lier des signaux entre eux (cascade de changement suite a un evenement hydratation incrementale (contenu progressivement interactif avec le chargement - sur les parties de la page visible ou necessaires et event replay, routing et modes de rendu en rendy hybride, Hot module replacement etc The State of Frontend — dernière compilation des préférences des développeurs en terme de front https://tsh.io/state-of-frontend/ React en tête, suivi de Vue et Svelte. Angular seulement 4ème Côté rendering framework, Next.js a la majorité absolue, ensuite viennent Nuxt et Astro Zod est la solution de validation préférée Pour la gestion de date, date-fns est en tête, suivi par moment.js Côté state management, React Context API en première place, mais les suivants sont tous aussi pour React ! Grosse utilisation de lodash pour plein d'utilités Pour fetcher des resources distantes, l'API native Fetch et Axios sont les 2 vaincoeurs Pour le déploiement, Vercel est premier Côté CI/CD, beaucoup de Github Actions, suivi par Gitlab CI Package management, malgré de bonnes alternatives, NPM se taille toujours la part du lion Ecrasante utilisation de Node.js comme runtime JavaScript pour faire du développement front Pour ce qui est du typing, beaucoup utilisent TypeScript, et un peu de JSdoc, et la majorité des répondants pensent que TypeScript a dépassé JavaScript en usage Dans les API natives du navigateur, Fetch, Storage et WebSockets sont les APIs les plus utilisées La popularité des PWA devrait suivre son petit bonhomme de chemin En terme de design system, shadcn.ui en tête, suivi par Material, puis Bootstram Pour la gestion des styles, un bon mix de plain old CSS, de Tailwind, et de Sass/CSS Jest est premier comme framework de tests Les 3/4 des développeurs front utilisent Visual Studio Code, quant au quart suivant, c'est JetBrains qui raffle les miettes Pour le build, Vite récolte les 4/5 des voix ESLint et Prettier sont les 2 favoris pour vérifier le code   Parfois, on aimerait pouvoir tester une librairie ou un framework JavaScript, sans pour autant devoir mettre en place tout un projet, avec outil de build et autre. Julia Evans explore les différents cas de figure, suivant la façon dont ces librairies sont bundlées https://jvns.ca/blog/2024/11/18/how-to-import-a-javascript-library/ Certaines librairies permette de ne faire qu'un simple import dans une balise script Certaines frameworks sont distribués sous forme d'Universal Module Definition, sous CommonJS, d'ESmodule franchemet en tant que noob c'est compliqué quand même Data et Intelligence Artificielle L'impact de l'IA en entreprise et des accès aux documents un peu laxistes https://archive.ph/uPyhX l'indexing choppe tout ce qu'il peut et l'IA est tres puissante pour diriger des requetes et extraires les données qui auraient du etre plus restreintes Différentes manières de faire de l'extraction de données et de forcer la main à un LLM pour qu'il génère du JSON https://glaforge.dev/posts/2024/11/18/data-extraction-the-many-ways-to-get-llms-to-spit-json-content/ l'approche “je demande gentiment” au LLM, en faisant du prompt engineering en utilisant du function calling pour les modèles supportant la fonctionnalité, en particulier avant les approches de type “JSON mode” ou “JSON schema” ou effectivement si le modèle le supporte aussi, toujours avec un peu de prompting, mais en utilisant le “JSON mode” qui force le LLM a générer du JSON valide encore mieux avec la possibilité de spécifier un schema JSON (type OpenAPI) pour que le JSON en sortie soit “compliant” avec le schéma proposé Comment masquer les données confidentielles avec ses échanges avec les LLMs https://glaforge.dev/posts/2024/11/25/redacting-sensitive-information-when-using-generative-ai-models/ utilisation de l'API Data Loss Prevention de Google Cloud qui permet d'identifier puis de censurer / masquer (“redacted” en anglais) des informations personnelles identifiables (“PII”, comme un nom, un compte bancaire, un numéro de passeport, etc) pour des raison de sécurité, de privacy, pour éviter les brèche de données comme on en entend trop souvent parler dans les nouvelles On peut utiliser certains modèles d'embedding pour faire de la recherche de code https://glaforge.dev/posts/2024/12/02/semantic-code-search-for-programming-idioms-with-langchain4j-and-vertex-ai-embedding-models/ Guillaume recherche des bouts de code, en entrant une requête en langue naturel Certains embedding models supportent différents types de tâches, comme question/réponse, question en langue naturelle / retour sous forme de code, ou d'autres tâches comme le fact checking, etc Dans cet article, utilisation du modèle de Google Cloud Vertex AI, en Java, avec LangChain4j Google sort la version 2 de Gemini Flash https://blog.google/technology/google-deepmind/google-gemini-ai-update-december-2024/ La nouvelle version Gemini 2.0 Flash dépasse même Gemini 1.5 Pro dans les benchmarks Tout en étant 2 fois plus rapide que Gemini 1.5 Pro, et bien que le prix ne soit pas encore annoncé, on imagine également plus abordable Google présente Gemini 2 comme le LLM idéal pour les “agents” Gemini propose une vraie multimodalité en sortie (premier LLM sur le marché à le proposer) : Gemini 2 peut entrelacer du texte, des images, de l'audio Gemini 2 supporte plus de 100 langues 8 voix de haute qualité, assez naturelles, pour la partie audio Un nouveau mode speech-to-speech en live, où on peut même interrompre le LLM, c'est d'ailleurs ce qui est utilisé dans Project Astra, l'application mobile montrée à Google I/O qui devient un vrai assistant vocale en live sur votre téléphone Google annonce aussi une nouvelle expérimentation autour des assistants de programmation, avec Project Jules, avec lequel on peut discuter en live aussi, partager son code, comme un vrai pair programmeur Google a présenté Project Mariner qui est un agent qui est sous forme d'extension Chrome, qui va permettre de commander votre navigateur comme votre assistant de recherche personnel, qui va être capable de faire des recherches sur le web, de naviguer dans les sites web, pour trouver les infos que vous recherchez Cet autre article montre différentes vidéos de démos de ces fonctionnalités https://developers.googleblog.com/en/the-next-chapter-of-the-gemini-era-for-developers/ Un nouveau projet appelé Deep Research, qui permet de faire des rapports dans Gemini Advanced : on donne un sujet et l'agent va proposer un plan pour un rapport sur ce sujet (qu'on peut valider, retoucher) et ensuite, Deep Research va effectuer des recherches sur le web pour vous, et faire la synthèse de ses recherches dans un rapport final https://blog.google/products/gemini/google-gemini-deep-research/ Enfin, Google AI Studio, en plus de vous permettre d'expérimenter avec Gemini 2, vous pourrez aussi utiliser des “starter apps” qui montrent comment faire de la reconnaissance d'objet dans des images, comment faire des recherches avec un agent connecté à Google Maps, etc. Google AI Studio permet également de partager votre écran avec lui, en mobile ou en desktop, de façon à l'utiliser comme un assistant qui peut voir ce que vous faites, ce que vous coder et peut répondre à vos questions Méthodologies Un article de GitHub sur l'impact de la surutilisation des CPU sur la perf de l'appli https://github.blog/engineering/architecture-optimization/breaking-down-cpu-speed-how-utilization-impacts-performance/ c'est surprenant qu'ils ont des effets des 30% de perf c'est du a la non limit thermique, au boost de frequece qui en suit ils ont donc cherché le golden ratio pour eux autour de 60% ils prennent des morceaux de cluster kube poru faire tourner les workloads et ajoutent des wqorkload CPU artificiels (genre math) Sécurité Attaque de la chaîne d'approvisionnement via javac https://xdev.software/en/news/detail/discovering-the-perfect-java-supply-chain-attack-vector-and-how-it-got-fixed s'appuie sur l'annotation processeur l'annotation processors des dependances est chargé et executé au moment du build du projet et cherche les annotations processor dans le user classpath (via le pattern serviceloader) et donc si la dependance est attaquée et un annotation processor est ajouté ou modifié on a un vecteur d'attaque au moment de la compilation du projet ciblé des qu'on deparre l'IDE en gros workaround, activer -proc:none et activer les annotation processors explicitly dans votre outil de build certaines améliorations dans le JDK: le compilateur note qu'il execute un annotation processor dans java 23+ les annotation processors sont deactivés par defaut Conférences La liste des conférences provenant de Developers Conferences Agenda/List par Aurélie Vache et contributeurs : 19 décembre 2024 : Normandie.ai 2024 - Rouen (France) 20 janvier 2025 : Elastic{ON} - Paris (France) 22-25 janvier 2025 : SnowCamp 2025 - Grenoble (France) 24-25 janvier 2025 : Agile Games Île-de-France 2025 - Paris (France) 30 janvier 2025 : DevOps D-Day #9 - Marseille (France) 6-7 février 2025 : Touraine Tech - Tours (France) 21 février 2025 : LyonJS 100 - Lyon (France) 28 février 2025 : Paris TS La Conf - Paris (France) 20 mars 2025 : PGDay Paris - Paris (France) 20-21 mars 2025 : Agile Niort - Niort (France) 25 mars 2025 : ParisTestConf - Paris (France) 26-29 mars 2025 : JChateau Unconference 2025 - Cour-Cheverny (France) 28 mars 2025 : DataDays - Lille (France) 28-29 mars 2025 : Agile Games France 2025 - Lille (France) 3 avril 2025 : DotJS - Paris (France) 10-11 avril 2025 : Android Makers - Montrouge (France) 10-12 avril 2025 : Devoxx Greece - Athens (Greece) 16-18 avril 2025 : Devoxx France - Paris (France) 29-30 avril 2025 : MixIT - Lyon (France) 7-9 mai 2025 : Devoxx UK - London (UK) 16 mai 2025 : AFUP Day 2025 Lille - Lille (France) 16 mai 2025 : AFUP Day 2025 Lyon - Lyon (France) 16 mai 2025 : AFUP Day 2025 Poitiers - Poitiers (France) 24 mai 2025 : Polycloud - Montpellier (France) 5-6 juin 2025 : AlpesCraft - Grenoble (France) 11-13 juin 2025 : Devoxx Poland - Krakow (Poland) 12-13 juin 2025 : Agile Tour Toulouse - Toulouse (France) 12-13 juin 2025 : DevLille - Lille (France) 24 juin 2025 : WAX 2025 - Aix-en-Provence (France) 26-27 juin 2025 : Sunny Tech - Montpellier (France) 1-4 juillet 2025 : Open edX Conference - 2025 - Palaiseau (France) 18-19 septembre 2025 : API Platform Conference - Lille (France) & Online 2-3 octobre 2025 : Volcamp - Clermont-Ferrand (France) 6-10 octobre 2025 : Devoxx Belgium - Antwerp (Belgium) 16-17 octobre 2025 : DevFest Nantes - Nantes (France) 6 novembre 2025 : dotAI 2025 - Paris (France) 12-14 novembre 2025 : Devoxx Morocco - Marrakech (Morocco) 23-25 avril 2026 : Devoxx Greece - Athens (Greece) 17 juin 2026 : Devoxx Poland - Krakow (Poland) Nous contacter Pour réagir à cet épisode, venez discuter sur le groupe Google https://groups.google.com/group/lescastcodeurs Contactez-nous via twitter https://twitter.com/lescastcodeurs Faire un crowdcast ou une crowdquestion Soutenez Les Cast Codeurs sur Patreon https://www.patreon.com/LesCastCodeurs Tous les épisodes et toutes les infos sur https://lescastcodeurs.com/

Our Burning Planet is the Daily Maverick section devoted to expert environmental opinion and analysis.  We partner up each Friday on the Afternoon Drive to discuss a burning issue. Julia Evans joins John to discuss the ground-breaking conviction of Unathi-Wena Fishing for illegal activities within the De Hoop Marine Protected Area.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Julia Evans of the Daily Maverick explains how AI is being used an effective method in determining Dolphin population size. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stephanie shares her newfound interest in naming conventions, highlighting a resource called "Classnames" that provides valuable names for programming and design. Joël, in turn, talks about using AI to generate names for D&D characters, emphasizing how AI can help provide inspiration and reasoning behind name suggestions. Then, they shift to Joël's interest in Roman history, where he discusses a blog by a Roman historian that explores distinctions between state and non-state peoples in the ancient Mediterranean. Together, the hosts delve into the importance of asking questions as consultants and developers to understand workflows, question assumptions, and build trust for better onboarding. Stephanie categorizes questions by engagement stages and their social and technical aspects, while Joël highlights how questioning reveals implicit assumptions and speeds up learning. They stress maintaining a curious mindset, using questions during PR reviews, and working with junior developers to foster collaboration. They conclude with advice on documenting answers and using questions for continuous improvement and effective decision-making in development teams. Class names inspiration (https://classnames.paulrobertlloyd.com/) How to Raise a Tribal Army in Pre-Roman Europe, Part II: Government Without States (https://acoup.blog/2024/06/14/collections-how-to-raise-a-tribal-army-in-pre-roman-europe-part-ii-government-without-states/) Diocletian, Constantine, Bedouin Sayings, and Network Defense (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCUI5ryyMSE) The Power of Being New: A Proven Recipe for High Impact (https://hazelweakly.me/blog/the-power-of-being-new--a-proven-recipe-for-high-impact/#the-power-of-being-new-a-proven-recipe-for-high-impact) How to ask good questions (https://jvns.ca/blog/good-questions/) Transcript:  JOËL: Hello and welcome to another episode of the Bike Shed, a weekly podcast from your friends at thoughtbot about developing great software. I'm Joël Quenneville. STEPHANIE: And I'm Stephanie Minn. And together, we're here to share a bit of what we've learned along the way. JOËL: So, Stephanie, what's new in your world? STEPHANIE: So, if it has not been clear about just kind of the things I'm mentioning on the podcast the past few weeks, I've been obsessed with naming things lately [chuckles] and just thinking about how to name things, and, yeah, just really excited about...or even just having fun with that more than I used to be as a dev. And I found a really cool resource called "Classnames." Well, it's like just a little website that a designer and developer shared from kind of as an offshoot from his personal website. I'll link it in the show notes. But it's basically just a list of common names that are very useful for programming or even design. It's just to help you find some inspiration when you're stuck trying to find a name for something. And they're general or abstract enough that, you know, it's almost like kind of like a design pattern but a naming pattern [laughs], I suppose. JOËL: Ooh. STEPHANIE: Yeah, right? And so, there's different categories. Like, here's a bunch of words that kind of describe collections. So, if you need to find the name for a containment or a group of things, here's a bunch of kind of words in the English language that might be inspiring. And then, there's also other categories like music for describing kind of the pace or arrangement of things. Fashion, words from fashion can describe, like, the size of things. You know, we talk about T-shirt sizes when we are estimating work. And yeah, I thought it was really cool that there's both things that draw on, you know, domains that most people know in real life, and then also things that are a little more abstract. But yeah, "Classnames" by Paul Robert Lloyd — that's been a fun little resource for me lately. JOËL: Very cool. Have you ever played around at all with using AI to help you come up with the naming? STEPHANIE: I have not. But I know that you and other people in my world have been enjoying using AI for inspiration when they feel a little bit stuck on something and kind of asking like, "Oh, like, how could I name something that is, like, a group of things?" or, you know, a prompt like that. I suspect that that would also be very helpful. JOËL: I've been having fun using that to help me come up with good names for D&D characters, and sometimes they're a little bit on the nose. But if I sort of describe my character, and what's their vibe, and a little bit of, like, what they do and their background, and, like, I've built this whole, like, persona, and then, I just ask the AI, "Hey, what might be some good names for this?" And the AI will give me a bunch of names along with some reasoning for why they think that would be a good match. So, it might be like, oh, you know, the person's name is, I don't know, Starfighter because it evokes their connection to the night sky or whatever because that was a thing that I put in the background. And so, it's really interesting. And sometimes they're, like, just a little too obvious. Like, you don't want, you know, Joe Fighter because he's a fighter. STEPHANIE: And his name is Joe [laughs]. JOËL: Yeah, but some of them are pretty good. STEPHANIE: Cool. Joël, what's new in your world? JOËL: I guess in this episode of how often does Joël think about the Roman Empire... STEPHANIE: Oh my gosh [laughs]. JOËL: Yes [laughs]. STEPHANIE: Spoiler: it's every day [laughs]. JOËL: Whaaat? There's a blog that I enjoy reading from a Roman historian. It's called "A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry", acoup.blog. He's recently been doing an article series on not the Romans, but rather some of these different societies that are around them, and talking a little bit about a distinction that he calls sort of non-state peoples versus states in the ancient Mediterranean. And what exactly is that distinction? Why does it matter? And those are terms I've heard thrown around, but I've never really, like, understood them. And so, he's, like, digging into a thing that I've had a question about for a while that I've been really appreciating. STEPHANIE: Can you give, like, the reader's digest for me? JOËL: For him, it's about who has the ability to wield violence legitimately. In a state, sort of the state has a monopoly on violence. Whereas in non-state organizations, oftentimes, it's much more personal, so you might have very different sort of nobles or big men who are able to raise, let's say, private armies and wage private war on each other, and that's not seen as, like, some, like, big breakdown of society. It's a legitimate use of force. It's just accepted that that's how society runs. As opposed to in a state, if a, you know, wealthy person decided to raise a private army, that would be seen as a big problem, and the state would either try to put you down or, like, more generally, society would, like, see you as having sort of crossed a line you shouldn't have crossed. STEPHANIE: Hmm, cool. I've been reading a lot of medieval fantasy lately, so this is kind of tickling my brain in that way when I think about, like, what drives different characters to do things, and kind of what the consequences of those things are. JOËL: Right. I think it would be really fascinating to sort of project this framework forwards and look at the European medieval period through that lens. It seems to me that, at least from a basic understanding, that the sort of feudal system seems to be very much in that sort of non-state category. So, I'd be really interested to see sort of a deeper analysis of that. And, you know, maybe he'll do an addendum to this series. Right now, he's mostly looking at the Gauls, the Celtiberians, and the Germanic tribes during the period of the Roman Republic. STEPHANIE: Cool. Okay. Well, I also await the day when you somehow figure how this relates to software [laughter] and inevitably make some mind-blowing connection and do a talk about it [laughs]. JOËL: I mean, theming is always fun. There's a talk that I saw years ago at Strange Loop that was looking at the defense policy of the Roman Emperor Diocletian and the Roman Emperor Constantine, and the ways that they sort of defended the borders of the empire and how they're very different, and then related it to how you might handle network security. STEPHANIE: Whaat? JOËL: And sort of like a, hey, are we using more of a Diocletian approach here, or are we using more of a Constantine approach here? And all of a sudden, just, like, having those labels to put on there and those stories that went with it made, like, what could be a really, like, dry security talk into something that I still remember 10 years later. STEPHANIE: Yeah. Yeah. We love stories. They're memorable. JOËL: So, I'll make sure to link that in the show notes. STEPHANIE: Very cool. JOËL: We've been talking a lot recently about my personal note system, where I keep a bunch of, like, small atomic notes that are all usually based around a single thesis statement. And I was going through that recently, and I found one that was kind of a little bit juicy. So, the thesis is that consultants are professional question-askers. And I'm curious, as a consultant yourself, how do you feel about that idea? STEPHANIE: Well, my first thought would be, how do I get paid to only ask in questions [laughs] or how to communicate in questions and not do anything else [laughs]? It's almost like I'm sure that there is some, like, fantasy character, you know, where it's like, there's some villain or just obstacle where you have this monster character who only talks in questions. And it's like a riddle that you have to solve [laughs] in order to get past. JOËL: I think it's called a three-year-old. STEPHANIE: Wow. Okay. Maybe a three-year-old can do my job then [laughter]. But I do think it's a juicy one, and it's very...I can't wait to hear how you got there, but I think my reaction is yes, like, I do be asking questions [laughs] when I join a project on a client team. And I was trying to separate, like, what kinds of questions I ask. And I kind of came away with a few different categories depending on, like, the stage of the engagement I'm in. But, you know, when I first join a team and when I'm first starting out consulting for a team, I feel like I just ask a lot of basic questions. Like, "Where's the Jira board [laughs]?" Like, "How do you do deployments here?" Like, "What kind of Git process do you use?" So, I don't know if those are necessarily the interesting ones. But I think one thing that has been nice is being a consultant has kind of stripped the fear of asking those questions because, I don't know, these are just things I need to know to do my work. And, like, I'm not as worried about, like, looking dumb or anything like that [laughs]. JOËL: Yeah. I think there's often a fear that asking questions might make you look incompetent or maybe will sort of undermine your appearance of knowing what you're talking about, and I think I've found that to be sort of the opposite. Asking a lot of questions can build more trust, both because it forces people to think about things that maybe they didn't think about, bring to light sort of implicit assumptions that everyone has, and also because it helps you to ramp up much more quickly and to be productive in a way that people really appreciate. STEPHANIE: Yeah. And I also think that putting those things in, like, a public and, like, documented space helps people in the future too, right? At least I am a power Slack searcher [laughs]. And whenever I am onboarding somewhere, one of the first places I go is just to search in Slack and see if someone has asked this question before. I think the next kind of category of question that I discerned was just, like, questions to understand how the team understands things. So, it's purely just to, like, absorb kind of like perspective or, like, a worldview this team has about their codebase, or their work, or whatever. So, I think those questions manifest as just like, "Oh, like, you know, I am curious, like, what do you think about how healthy your codebase is? Or what kinds of bugs is your team, like, dealing with?" Just trying to get a better understanding of like, what are the challenges that this team is facing in their own words, especially before I even start to form my own opinions. Well, okay, to be honest, I probably am forming my own opinions, like, on the side [laughs], but I really try hard to not let that be the driver of how I'm showing up and especially in the first month I'm starting on a new team. JOËL: Would you say these sorts of questions are more around sort of social organization or, like, how a team approaches work, that sort of thing? Or do you classify more technical questions in this category? So, like, "Hey, tell me a little bit about your philosophy around testing." Or we talked in a recent episode "What value do you feel you get out of testing?" as a question to ask before even, like, digging into the implementation. STEPHANIE: Yeah, I think these questions, for me, sit at, like, the intersection of both social organization and technical questions because, you know, asking something like, "What's the value of testing for your team?" That will probably give me information about how their test suite is like, right? Like, what kinds of tests they are writing and kind of the quality of them maybe. And it also tells me about, yeah, like, maybe the reasons why, like, they only have just unit tests or maybe, like, just [inaudible 12:31] test, or whatever. And I think all of that is helpful information. And then, that's actually a really...I like the distinction you made because I feel like then the last category of questions that I'll mention, for now, feels like more geared towards technical, especially the questions I ask to debunk assumptions that might be held by the team. And I feel like that's like kind of the last...the evolution of my question-asking. Because I have, hopefully, like, really absorbed, like, why, you know, people think the way they do about some of these, you know, about their code and start to poke a little bit on being like, "Why do you think, you know, like, this problem space has to be modeled this way?" And that has served me well as a consultant because, you know, once you've been at an organization for a while, like, you start to take a lot of things for granted about just having to always be this way, you know, it's like, things just are the way they are. And part of the power of, you know, being this kind of, like, external observer is starting to kind of just like, yeah, be able to question that. And, you know, at the end of day, like, we choose not to change something, but I think it's very powerful to be able to at least, like, open up that conversation. JOËL: Right. And sometimes you open up that conversation, and what you get is a link to a big PR discussion or a Wiki or something where that discussion has already been had. And then, that's good for you and probably good for anybody else who has that question as well. STEPHANIE: I'm curious, for you, though, like, this thesis statement, atomic note, did you have notes around it, or was it just, like, you dropped it in there [laughs]? JOËL: So, I have a few things, one is that when you come in as a consultant, and, you know, we're talking here about consultants because that's what we do. I think this is probably true for most people onboarding, especially for non-junior roles where you're coming in, and there's an assumption of expertise, but you need to onboard onto a project. This is just particularly relevant for us as consultants because we do this every six months instead of, you know, a senior developer who's doing this maybe every two to three years. So, the note that I have here is that when you're brought on, clients they expect expertise in a technology, something like Ruby on Rails or, you know, just the web environment in general. They don't expect you as a consultant to be an expert in their domain or their practices. And so, when you really engage with this sort of areas that are new by asking a lot of questions, that's the thing that's really valuable, especially if those questions are coming from a place of experience in other similar things. So, maybe asking some questions around testing strategies because you've seen three or four other ways that work or don't work or that have different trade-offs. Even asking about, "Hey, I see we went down a particular path, technically. Can you walk me through what were the trade-offs that we evaluated and why we decided this was the path that was valuable for us?" That's something that people really appreciate from outside experts. Because it shows that you've got experience in those trade-offs, that you've thought the deeper thoughts beyond just shipping the next ticket. And sometimes they've made the decisions without actually thinking through the trade-offs. And so, that can be an opening for a conversation of like, "Hey, well, we just went down this path because we saw a blog article that recommended this, or we just did this because it felt right. Talk us through the trade-offs." And now maybe you have a conversation on, "Hey, here are the trade-offs that you're doing. Let me know if this sounds right for your organization. If not, maybe you want to consider changing some things or tweaking your approach." And I think that is valuable sort of at the big level where you're thinking about how the team is structured, how different parts of work is done, the technical architecture, but it also is valuable at the small level as well. STEPHANIE: Yeah, 100%. There is a blog post I really like by Hazel Weakly, and it's called "The Power of Being New: A Proven Recipe for High Impact." And one thing that she says at the beginning that I really enjoy is that even though, like, whenever you start on a new team there's always that little bit of pressure of starting to deliver immediate value, right? But there's something really special about that period where no one expects you to do anything, like, super useful immediately [laughs]. And I feel like it is both a fleeting time and, you know, I'm excited to continue this conversation of, like, how to keep integrating that even after you're no longer new. But I like to use that time to just identify, while I have nothing really on my plate, like, things that might have just been overlooked or just people have gotten used to that sometimes is, honestly, like, can be a quick fix, right? Like, just, I don't know, deleting a piece of dead code that you're seeing is no longer used but just gets fallen off other people's plates. I really enjoy those first few weeks, and people are almost, like, always so appreciative, right? They're like, "Oh my gosh, I have been meaning to do that." Or like, "Great find." And these are things that, like I said, just get overlooked when you are, yeah, kind of busy with other things that now are your responsibility. JOËL: You're talking about, like, that feeling of can you add value in the, like, initial time that you join. And I think that sometimes it can be easy to think that, oh, the only value you can add is by, like, shipping code. I think that being sort of noisy and asking a lot of questions in Slack is often a great way to add value, especially at first. STEPHANIE: Yeah, agreed. JOËL: Ideally, I think you come in, and you don't sort of slide in under the radar as, like, a new person on the team. Like, you come in, and everybody knows you're there because you are, like, spamming the channel with questions on all sorts of things and getting people to either link you to resources they have or explaining different topics, especially anything domain-related. You know, you're coming in with an outside expertise in a technology. You are a complete new person at the business and the problem domain. And so, that's an area where you need to ask a lot of questions and ramp up quickly. STEPHANIE: Yes. I have a kind of side topic. I guess it's not a side topic. It's about asking questions, so it's relevant [laughs]. But one thing that I'm curious about is how do you approach kind of doing this in a place where question asking is not normalized and maybe other people are less comfortable with kind of people asking questions openly and in public? Like, how do you set yourself up to be able to ask questions in a way that doesn't lead to just, like, some just, like, suspicion or discomfort about, like, why you're asking those questions? JOËL: I think that's the beauty of the consultant title. When an organization brings in outside experts, they kind of expect you to ask questions. Or maybe it's not an explicit expectation, but when they see you asking a lot of questions, it sort of, I think, validates a lot of things that they expect about what an outside expert should be. So, asking a lot of questions of trying to understand your business, asking a lot of questions to try to understand the technical architecture, asking questions around, like, some subtle edge cases or trade-offs that were made in the technical architecture. These are all things that help clients feel like they're getting value for the money from an outside expert because that's what you want an outside expert to do is to help you question some of your assumptions, to be able to leverage their, like, general expertise in a technology by applying it to your specific situation. I've had situations where I'll ask, like, a very nuanced, deep technical question about, like, "Hey, so there's, like, this one weird edge case that I think could potentially happen. How do we, like, think through about this?" And one of the, like, more senior people on the team who built the initial codebase responded, like, almost, like, proud that I've discovered this, like, weird edge case, and being like, "Oh yeah, that was a thing that we did think about, and here's why. And it's really cool that, like, day one you're, like, just while reading through the code and were like, 'Oh, this thing,' because it took us, like, a month of thinking about it before we stumbled across that." So, it was a weird kind of fun interaction where as a new person rolling on, one of the more experienced devs in the codebase almost felt, like, proud of me for having found that. STEPHANIE: I like that, yeah. I feel like a lot of the time...it's like, it's so easy to ask questions to help people feel seen, to be like, "Oh yeah, like, I noticed this." And, you know, if you withhold any kind of, like, judgment about it when you ask the question, people are so willing to be like, yeah, like you said, like, "Oh, I'm glad you saw that." Or like, "Isn't that weird? Like, I was feeling, you know, I saw that, too." Or, like, it opens it up, I think, for building trust, which, again, like, I don't even think this is something that you necessarily need to be new to even do. But if at any point you feel like, you know, maybe your working relationship with someone could be better, right? To the point where you feel like you're, like, really on the same page, yeah, ask questions [laughs]. It can be that easy. JOËL: And I think what can be really nice is, in an environment where question asking is not normalized, coming in and doing that can help sort of provide a little bit of cover to other people who are feeling less comfortable or less safe doing that. So, maybe there's a lot of junior members on the team who are feeling not super confident in themselves and are afraid that asking questions might undermine their position in the company. But me coming in as a sort of senior consultant and asking a lot of those questions can then help normalize that as a thing because then they can look and say, "Oh, well he's asking all these questions. Maybe I can ask my question, and it'll be okay." STEPHANIE: I also wanted to talk about setting yourself up and asking questions to get a good answer, asking good questions to get useful answers. One thing that has worked really well for me in the past few months has been sharing why I'm asking the question. And I think this goes back to a little bit of what I was hinting at earlier. If the culture is not really used to people asking questions and that just being a thing that is normal, sharing a bit of intention can help, like, ease maybe some nervousness that people might feel. Especially as consultants, we also are in a bit of a, I don't know, like, there is some power dynamics occasionally where it's like, oh, like, the consultants are here. Like, what are they going to come in and change or, like, start, you know, doing to, quote, unquote, "improve", whatever, I don't know [laughs]. JOËL: Right, right. STEPHANIE: Yeah, that's the consultant archetype, I think. Anyway. JOËL: Just coming in and being like, "Oh, this is bad, and this is bad, and you're doing it wrong." STEPHANIE: [laughs] JOËL: Ooh, I would be ashamed if I was the author of this code. STEPHANIE: Yeah, my hot take is that that is a bad consultant [laughs]. But maybe I'll say, like, "I am looking for some examples of this pattern. Where can I find them [laughs]?" Or "I've noticed that the team is struggling with, like, this particular part of the codebase, and I am thinking about improving it. What are some of your biggest challenges, like, working with this, like, model?" something like that. And I think this also goes back to, like, proving value, right? Even if it's like, sometimes I know kind of what I want to do, and I'll try to be explicit about that. But even before I have, like, a clear action item, I might just say like, "I'm thinking about this," you know, to convey that, you know, I'm still in that information gathering stage, but the result of that will be useful to help me with whatever kind of comes out of it. JOËL: A lot of it is about, like, genuine curiosity and an amount of empathetic listening. Existing team knows a lot about both the code and the business. And as a consultant coming on or maybe even a more senior person onboarding onto a team, the existing team has so much that they can give you to help you be better at your job. STEPHANIE: I was also revisiting a really great blog post from Julia Evans about "How to Ask Good Questions." And this one is more geared towards asking technical questions that have, like, kind of a maybe more straightforward answer. But she included a few other strategies that I liked a lot. And, frankly, I feel like I want to be even better at finding the right time to ask questions [laughs] and finding the right person to ask those questions to. I definitely get in the habit of just kind of like, I don't know, I'll just put it out there and [laughs], hopefully, get some answers. But there are definitely ways, I think, that you can be more strategic, right? About identifying who might be the best person to provide the answers you're looking for. And I think another thing that I often have to balance in the consulting position is when to know when to, like, stop kind of asking the really big questions because we just don't have time [laughs]. JOËL: Right. You don't want to be asking questions in a way that's sort of undermining the product, or the decisions that are being made, or the work that has to get done. Ideally, the questions that you're asking are helping move the project forward in a positive way. Nobody likes the, you know, just asking kind of person. That person's annoying. STEPHANIE: Do you have an approach or any thoughts about like, once you get an answer, like, what do you do with that? Yeah, what happens then for you? JOËL: I guess there's a lot of different ways it can go. A potential way if it's just, like, an answer explained in Slack, is maybe saying, "We should document this." Or maybe even like, "Is this documented anywhere? If not, can I add that documentation somewhere?" And maybe that's, you know, a code comment that we want to add. Maybe that's an entry to the Wiki. Maybe that's updating the README. Maybe that's adding a test case. But converting that into something actionable can often be a really good follow-up. STEPHANIE: Yeah, I think that mitigates the just asking [laughs] thing that you were saying earlier, where it's like, you know, the goal isn't to ask questions to then make more work for other people, right? It's to ask questions so, hopefully, you're able to take that information and do something valuable with it. JOËL: Right. Sometimes it can be a sort of setup for follow-up questions. You get some information and you're like, okay, so, it looks like we do have a pattern for interacting with third-party APIs, but we're not using it consistently. Tell me a little bit about why that is. Is that a new pattern that we've introduced and we're trying to, like, get more buy-in from the team? Is this a pattern that we used to have, and we found out we didn't like it? So, we stopped using it, but we haven't found a replacement pattern that we like. And so, now we're just kind of...it's a free-for-all, and we're trying to figure it out. Maybe there's two competing patterns, and there is this, like, weird politics within the tech team where they're sort of using one or the other, and that's something I'm going to have to be careful to navigate. So, asking some of those follow-up questions and once you have a technical answer can yield a lot of really interesting information and then help you think about how you can be impactful on the organization. STEPHANIE: And that sounds like advice that's just true, you know, regardless of your role or how long you've been in it, don't you think? JOËL: I would say yes. If you've been in the role a long time, though, you're the person who has that sort of institutional history in your mind. You know that in 2022, we switched over from one framework to another. You know that we used to have this, like, very opinionated architect who mandated a particular pattern, and then we moved away from it. You know that we were all in on this big feature last summer that we released and then nobody used it, and then the business pivoted, but there's still aspects of it that are left around. Those are things that someone knew onboarding doesn't know and that, hopefully, they're asking questions that you can then answer. STEPHANIE: Have you been in the position where you have all that, like, institutional knowledge? And then, like, how do you maintain that sense of curiosity or just that sense of kind of, like, what you're talking about, that superpower that you get when you're new of being able to just, you know, kind of question why things are the way they are? JOËL: It's hard, right? We're talking about how do you keep that sort of almost like a beginner's mindset, in this case, maybe less of a, like, new coder mindset and more of a new hire mindset. It's something that I think is much more front of mind for me because I rotate onto new clients every, like, 6 to 12 months. And so, I don't have very long to get comfortable before I'm immediately thrown into, like, a new situation. But something that I like to do is to never sort of solely be in one role or the other, a sort of, like, experienced person helping others or the new person asking for help. Likely, you are not going to be the newest person on the team for long. Maybe you came on as a cohort and you've got a group of new people, all of whom are asking different questions. And maybe somebody is asking a question that you've asked before, that you've asked in a different channel or on a call with someone. Or maybe someone joins two weeks after you; you don't have deep institutional knowledge. But if you've been asking a lot of questions, you've been building a lot of that for yourself, and you have a little bit that you can share to the next person who knows even less than you do. And that's an approach that I took even as an apprentice developer. When I was, like, brand new to Rails and I was doing an internship, and another intern joined me a couple of weeks after, and I was like, "You know what? I barely know anything. But I know what an instance variable is. And I can help you write a controller action. Let's pair on that. We'll figure it out. And, you know, ask me another question next week. I might have more answers for you." So, I guess a little bit of paying it forward. STEPHANIE: Yeah, I really like that advice, though, of, like, switching up the role or, like, kind of what you're working on, just finding opportunities to practice that, you know, even if you have been somewhere for a long time. I think that is really interesting advice. And it's hard, too, right? Because that requires, like, doing something new, and doing something new can be hard [laughs]. But if you're, you know, aren't in a consultant role, where you're not rotating onto new projects every 6 to 12 months, that, I feel like, would be a good strategy to grow in that particular way. JOËL: And even if you're not switching companies or in a consulting situation, it's not uncommon to have people switch from one team to another within an organization. And new team might mean new dynamics. That team might be doing a slightly different approach to project management. Their part of the code might be structured slightly differently. They might be dealing with a part of the business domain that you're less familiar with. While that might not be entirely new to you because, you know, you know a little bit of the organization's DNA and you understand the organization's mission and their core product, there are definitely a lot of things that will be new to you, and asking those questions becomes important. STEPHANIE: I also have another kind of, I don't know, it's not even a strategy. It's just a funny thing that I do where, like, my memory is so poor that, like, even code I wrote, you know, a month ago, I'm like, oh, what was past Stephanie thinking here [laughs]? You know, questioning myself a little bit, right? And being willing to do that and recognizing that, like, I have information now that I didn't have in the past. And, like, can that be useful somehow? You know, it's like, the code I wrote a month ago is not set in stone. And I think that's one way I almost, like, practice that skill with myself [laughs]. And yeah, it has helped me combat that, like, things are the way they are mentality, which, generally, I think is a very big blocker [laughs] when it comes to software development, but that's a topic for another day [laughs]. JOËL: I like the idea of questioning yourself, and I think that's something that is a really valuable skill for all developers. I think it can come up in things like documentation. Let's say you're leaving a comment on a method, especially one that's a bit weird, being able to answer that "Why was this weird technical decision made?" Or maybe you do this in your PR description, or your commit message, or in any of the other places where you do this, not just sort of shipping the code as is, but trying to look at it from an outsider's eyes. And being like, what are the areas where they're going to, like, get a quizzical look and be like, "Why is this happening? Why did you make this choice?" Bonus points if you talked a little bit about the trade-offs that were decided on to say, "Hey, there were two different implementations available for this. I chose to take implementation A because I like this set of trade-offs better." That's gold. And, I guess, as a reviewer, if I'm seeing that in a PR, that's going to make my job a lot easier. STEPHANIE: Yes. Yeah, I never thought about it that way, but yeah, I guess I do kind of apply, you know, the things that I would kind of ask to other team members to myself sometimes. And that is...it's cool to hear that you really appreciate that because I always kind of just did it for myself [laughs], but yeah, I'm sure that it, like, is helpful for other people as well. JOËL: I guess you were asking what are ways that you can ask questions even when you are more established. And talking about these sorts of self-reflective questions in the context of review got me thinking that PRs are a great place to ask questions. They're great when you're a newcomer. One of the things I like to do when I'm new on a project is do a lot of PR reviews so I can just see the weird things that people are working on and ask a lot of questions about the patterns. STEPHANIE: Yep. Same here. JOËL: Do a lot of code reading. But that's a thing that you can keep doing and asking a lot of questions on PRs and not in a, like, trying to undermine what the person is doing, but, like, genuine questions, I think, is a great way to maintain that mindset. STEPHANIE: Yeah, yeah, agreed. And I think when I've seen it done well, it's like, you get to be engaged and involved with the rest of your team, right? And you kind of have a bit of an idea about what people are working on. But you're also kind of entrusting them with ownership of that work. Like, you don't need to be totally in the weeds and know exactly how every method works. But, you know, you can be curious about like, "Oh, like, what were you thinking about this?" Or like, "What about this pattern appeals to you?" And all of that information, I think, helps you become a better, like, especially a senior developer, but also just, like, a leader on the team, I think. JOËL: Yeah, especially the questions around like, "Oh, walk me through some of the trade-offs that you chose for this method." And, you know, for maybe a person who's more senior, that's great. They have an opportunity to, like, talk about the decisions they made and why. That's really useful information. For a more junior person, maybe they've never thought about it. They're like, "Oh, wait, there are trade-offs here?" and now that's a great learning opportunity for them. And you don't want to come at it from a place of judgment of like, oh, well, clearly, you know, you're a terrible developer because you didn't think about the performance implications of this method. But if you come at it from a place of, like, genuine curiosity and sort of assuming the best of people on the team and being willing to work alongside them, help them discover some new concepts...maybe they've never, like, interacted so much with performance trade-offs, and now you get to have a conversation. And they've learned a thing, and everybody wins. STEPHANIE: Yeah. And also, I think seeing people ask questions that way helps more junior folks also learn when to ask those kinds of questions, even if they don't know the answer, right? But maybe they start kind of pattern matching. Like, oh, like, there might be some other trade-offs to consider with this kind of code, but I don't know what they are yet. But now I know to at least start asking and find someone who can help me determine that. And when I've seen that, that has been always, like, just so cool because it's upskilling happening [laughs] in practice. JOËL: Exactly. I love that phrase that you said: "Asking questions where you don't know the answers," which I think is the opposite of what lawyers are taught to do. I think lawyers the mantra they have is you never ask a witness a question that you don't know the answer to. But I like to flip that for developers. Ask a lot of questions on PRs where you don't know the answer, and you'll grow, and the author will grow. And this is true across experience levels. STEPHANIE: That's one of my favorite parts about being a developer, and maybe that's why I will never be a lawyer [laughter]. JOËL: On that note, I have a question maybe I do know the answer to. Shall we wrap up? STEPHANIE: Let's wrap up. Show notes for this episode can be found at bikeshed.fm. JOËL: This show has been produced and edited by Mandy Moore. STEPHANIE: If you enjoyed listening, one really easy way to support the show is to leave us a quick rating or even a review in iTunes. It really helps other folks find the show. JOËL: If you have any feedback for this or any of our other episodes, you can reach us @_bikeshed, or you can reach me @joelquen on Twitter. STEPHANIE: Or reach both of us at hosts@bikeshed.fm via email. JOËL: Thanks so much for listening to The Bike Shed, and we'll see you next week. ALL: Byeeeeeeee!!!!!!! AD: Did you know thoughtbot has a referral program? If you introduce us to someone looking for a design or development partner, we will compensate you if they decide to work with us. More info on our website at: tbot.io/referral. Or you can email us at: referrals@thoughtbot.com with any questions.

Guest Julia Evans Panelists Richard Littauer | Amanda Casari Show Notes In this episode of Sustain, host Richard Littauer and co-host Amanda Casari talk to Julia Evans, a zine artist and programmer from Montreal. The discussion delves into Julia's journey in creating educational zines about technical topics like strace, Bash, and Git. Julia shares insights into her unique approach to making complex tools more accessible, how she uses feedback and beta readers to refine her work, and the importance of writing about stable technologies. The episode also touches on Julia's balance between art and sustainability, her collaborative work with her team, and highlights the significance of community-driven knowledge sharing. Press download to hear much more! [00:01:44] Julia explains her approach to creating zines, starting with the desire to simplify the usage of complex tools like strace. [00:03:14] Julia discusses her background as a programmer and the thematic focus of her zines, including making technical topics like Bash scripting more approachable. [00:04:54] Amanda praises Julia's method of demystifying technical concepts through zines. Julia shares the challenges of creating zines on complex topics like Git, discussing how user feedback helps refine content. [00:07:14] Julia details the iterative process of creating zines, including using beta readers and feedback tools to enhance the clarity and usefulness of her guides. [00:11:50] The discussion shifts to how Julia selects topics for her zines, focusing on technologies with strong backward compatibility guarantees, ensuring that the content remains relevant and accurate over time. [00:15:59] Richard questions Julia about her preference for creating zines over other formats like video tutorials or classes, despite the potential reach and educational impact of those mediums. She explains her preference for zines, highlighting her affinity for print and writing, and he challenge with video formats. [00:19:13] Julia discusses her transformative experience at the Recurse Center, which greatly enhanced her understanding of computer systems, inspiring her to help others feel like “wizards” who fully grasp their tools. [00:21:39] Julia mentions co-founding “bang bang con,” a conference focused on short, insightful talks about programming, and confirms the availability of these talks online. [00:22:46] Richard asks Julia about “weird stuff” she likes to do with computers. She describes creating a DNS server that open shares queries, reflecting her passion for making the invisible aspects of computing visible. [00:24:43] Julia reveals how she funds her zine-making and educational endeavors through sales, which has allowed her to focus full-time on this work and even hire help to manage operations, enhancing sustainability and enjoyment of her work. [00:26:05] Julia reflects on the unpredictability of her success, expressing hesitation to offer advice on replicating her business model due to its unconventional nature. [00:27:47] Julia shares her approach to team building and sustainability, focusing on treating and paying her collaborators well to endure ongoing successful partnerships. [00:28:44] Find out where you can purchase Julia's zines and find her online. Quotes [00:02:19] “I would have all these questions, what are people using this tool for?” [00:02:45] “I wanted to show people that this is not that big of a deal.” [00:06:26] “This is what I wish someone told me when I started using this tool.” [00:17:08] “I don't usually want to learn a book's worth of information about a topic. I'm a generalist.” [00:17:40] “My dream when learning about something is I just want to talk to someone who's really, really smart for two hours and they'll tell me everything I need to know.” [00:21:11] “You can do weird stuff!” [00:24:07] “I just thought it would be cool to make it, so I did.” [00:26:34] “Once I saw that I was working, I started to ask, is it sustainable? What do I need to learn about marketing to make it a sustainable business?” [00:28:29] “I try to be the last client to get fired. That's my dream.” Spotlight [00:29:43] Amanda's spotlight is she finally got to attend csv,conf,v8. [00:30:40] Richard's spotlight is Rafik Draoui. [00:31:26] Julia's spotlight is Atuin, a really nice way to search your shell history. Links SustainOSS (https://sustainoss.org/) SustainOSS Twitter (https://twitter.com/SustainOSS?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor) SustainOSS Discourse (https://discourse.sustainoss.org/) podcast@sustainoss.org (mailto:podcast@sustainoss.org) SustainOSS Mastodon (https://mastodon.social/tags/sustainoss) Open Collective-SustainOSS (Contribute) (https://opencollective.com/sustainoss) Richard Littauer Socials (https://www.burntfen.com/2023-05-30/socials) Amanda Casari X/Twitter (https://x.com/amcasari?lang=en) Julia Evans Blog (https://jvns.ca/) Julia Evans Mastodon (https://social.jvns.ca/@b0rk) Julia Evans X/Twitter (https://x.com/b0rk) Julia Evans GitHub (https://github.com/jvns) strace (https://strace.io/) Write Useful Books by Rob Fitzpatrick (https://writeusefulbooks.com/) Space Jam (https://www.spacejam.com/1996/jam.html) Recurse Center (https://www.recurse.com/) Sustain Podcast-Episode 146: Anjana Vakil on the Recurse Center, Outreachy, and Learning to Code (https://podcast.sustainoss.org/146) !!Con 2024 (bang bang con) (https://bangbangcon.com/) Gazouilli by Rafik Draoui (https://github.com/rafikdraoui/gazouilli) Wizard Zines (https://wizardzines.com/) Wizard Zine on strace (https://wizardzines.com/zines/strace/) New zine: How Git Works! by Julia Evans (https://jvns.ca/blog/2024/04/25/new-zine--how-git-works-/) Mess with dns (https://messwithdns.net/) Csv,conf,v8 (https://csvconf.com/) Rafik Draoui GitHub (https://github.com/rafikdraoui) Atuin (https://github.com/atuinsh/atuin) Credits Produced by Richard Littauer (https://www.burntfen.com/) Edited by Paul M. Bahr at Peachtree Sound (https://www.peachtreesound.com/) Show notes by DeAnn Bahr Peachtree Sound (https://www.peachtreesound.com/) Special Guest: Julia Evans.

Julia Evans, climate and biodiversity journalist at the Daily Maverick, joins John Maytham on the Afternoon Drive show to talk about thirty-two southern white rhinos took their first steps into the Sabi Sand Nature Reserve, marking a significant milestone in conservation effortsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode we share our thoughts on the React 19 updates from React Labs. This blog is from the React Labs and talks about a whole bunch of big changes being worked on for the upcoming React 19 major version release. If you want to stay on top of things like a new compiler, the React team destroying your beloved form libraries, a million new hooks and more, take a listen! Episode links: 1. https://learn.cantrill.io/ for cloud courses 2. React Forget talk 3. So You Think You Know Git (YouTube) 4. Julia Evans' Git Options blog post Music by Hina

Our Burning Planet is the Daily Maverick section devoted to expert environmental opinion and analysis. We partner up each Friday on the Afternoon Drive to discuss a burning issue. Julia Evans joins Pippa to tell the story of an old cable ship which recently sank in Simon's Town harbour.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

St. Thomas University graduates Julia Evans and Elisha Gunaratnam were in Geneva, Switzerland, to compete in the Nelson Mandela World Human Rights Moot Court Competition. We reach them to hear how they did. 

St. Thomas University graduates Julia Evans and Elisha Gunaratnam are in Geneva, Switzerland competing in the Nelson Mandela World Human Rights Moot Court Competition. They joins us to share that experience.

Guest: Our Burning Planet is the Daily Maverick section devoted to expert environmental opinion and analysis. We partner up each Friday on the Afternoon Drive to discuss a burning issue. Julia Evans joins Mike to discuss the bold conservation funding ideas that are needed if we are to avoid disaster.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Watch on YouTube About the show Sponsored by us! Support our work through: Our courses at Talk Python Training Test & Code Podcast Patreon Supporters Connect with the hosts Michael: @mkennedy@fosstodon.org Brian: @brianokken@fosstodon.org Show: @pythonbytes@fosstodon.org Join us on YouTube at pythonbytes.fm/live to be part of the audience. Usually Tuesdays at 11am PT. Older video versions available there too. Brian #1: Plumbum: Shell Combinators and More Suggested by Henry Schreiner last week. (Also, thanks Michael for the awesome search tool on PythonBytes.fm that includes transcripts, so I can find stuff discussed and not just stuff listed in the show notes.) Plumbum is “ a small yet feature-rich library for shell script-like programs in Python. The motto of the library is “Never write shell scripts again”, and thus it attempts to mimic the shell syntax (shell combinators) where it makes sense, while keeping it all Pythonic and cross-platform.” Supports local commands piping redirection working directory changes in a with block. So cool. lots more fun features Michael #2: Our plan for Python 3.13 The big difference is that we have now finished the foundational work that we need: Low impact monitoring (PEP 669) is implemented. The bytecode compiler is a much better state. The interpreter generator is working. Experiments on the register machine are complete. We have a viable approach to create a low-overhead maintainable machine code generator, based on copy-and-patch. We plan three parallelizable pieces of work for 3.13: The tier 2 optimizer Enabling subinterpreters from Python code (PEP 554). Memory management Details on superblocks Brian #3: Some blogging myths Julia Evans myths (more info of each in the blog post): you need to be original you need to be an expert posts need to be 100% correct writing boring posts is bad you need to explain every concept page views matter more material is always better everyone should blog I'd add Write posts to help yourself remember something. Write posts to help future prospective employers know what topics you care about. You know when you find a post that is outdated and now wrong, and the code doesn't work, but the topic is interesting to you. Go ahead and try to write a better post with code that works. Michael #4: Jupyter AI A generative AI extension for JupyterLab An %%ai magic that turns the Jupyter notebook into a reproducible generative AI playground. This works anywhere the IPython kernel runs (JupyterLab, Jupyter Notebook, Google Colab, VSCode, etc.). A native chat UI in JupyterLab that enables you to work with generative AI as a conversational assistant. Support for a wide range of generative model providers and models (AI21, Anthropic, Cohere, Hugging Face, OpenAI, SageMaker, etc.). Official project from Jupyter Provides code insights Debug failing code Provides a general interface for interaction and experimentation with currently available LLMs Lets you collaborate with peers and an Al in JupyterLab Lets you ask questions about local files Video presentation: David Qiu - Jupyter AI — Bringing Generative AI to Jupyter | PyData Seattle 2023 Extras Brian: Textual has some fun releases recently Textualize youtube channel with 3 tutorials so far trogon to turn Click based command line apps into TUIs video example of it working with sqlite-utils. Python in VSCode June Release includes revamped test discovery and execution. You have to turn it on though, as the changes are experimental: "python.experiments.optInto": [ "pythonTestAdapter", ] I just turned it on, so I haven't formed an opinion yet. Michael: Michael's take on the MacBook Air 15” (black one) Joke: Phishing

Join your dynamic duo, Brooke and Dave, as they sit down with Stuart Clark, Sr. Developer Advocate, AWS Community Engagement Team, and Du'An Lightfoot, Sr. Cloud Networking Developer Advocate AWS Infrastructure specialist team. Developer Advocates and hosts of the popular Twitch show, Big Dev Theory, Du'an and Stuart have set the virtual stage ablaze with their infectious passion for building solutions for developers, by developers. Demos over PowerPoints, and coding over theory. The two walk us through their exciting journey and share invaluable insights. For those keen on unlocking the mysteries of the networking underlying AWS services, Du'an's got a pocket full of tips and his inspiring transition from military life to the tech world. And just when you think it's all techie, we delve into the enigma that is...baby carrots

Julia Evans spoke with us about how computers compute. We discussed number representation including floating point as well as Julia's extensive collection of ‘zines and comics. Julia's zines about debugging, managers, Linux commands, and more are available on WizardZines.com. If you want samples, check out the comics section. Also, the experiments (aka playgrounds) are great additions to the zines (and fun on their own), letting you explore without changing your own DNS or removing all the files from your root directory. If you want to check out numbers, look at memory-spy (or from other sites like https://float.exposed/ and https://integer.exposed/) Julia also has a detailed blog on jvns.ca and active github repositories Transcript

Reddit goes dark as subreddits protest, Lemmy lights up as disillusioned redditors turn to the fediverse, OpenObserve is a cloud native observability platform, Julia Evans dispels some myths about blogging & Red Hat's Jeffrey “Jefro” Osier-Mixon tells Adam and Jerod all about Automotive Linux at Open Source Summit NA.

Reddit goes dark as subreddits protest, Lemmy lights up as disillusioned redditors turn to the fediverse, OpenObserve is a cloud native observability platform, Julia Evans dispels some myths about blogging & Red Hat's Jeffrey “Jefro” Osier-Mixon tells Adam and Jerod all about Automotive Linux at Open Source Summit NA.

Reddit goes dark as subreddits protest, Lemmy lights up as disillusioned redditors turn to the fediverse, OpenObserve is a cloud native observability platform, Julia Evans dispels some myths about blogging & Red Hat's Jeffrey “Jefro” Osier-Mixon tells Adam and Jerod all about Automotive Linux at Open Source Summit NA.

Lindie Malan's guest on Business Lunch with Lindie was the phenomenal Julia Evans. Julia is the General Manager of Animal Welfare Helderberg. She first got involved with the organisation in 1998, and within 3 months she became the general manager. Hear all about Julia's amazing and inspiring journey on this week's edition of Business Lunch with Lindie.

Guest: Our Burning Planet is the Daily Maverick section devoted to expert environmental opinion and analysis. We partner up each Friday on the Afternoon Drive to discuss a burning issue. Julia Evans joins John to discuss ‘Frankfort and Eskom for BP'.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Guest: Our Burning Planet is the Daily Maverick section devoted to expert environmental opinion and analysis. We partner up each Friday on the Afternoon Drive to discuss a burning issue. Julia Evans joins Africa to discuss Sharks washed up on Cape shore.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stephanie raves about more software development-related zines by Julia Evans. Joël has been thinking about the mechanics of rolling dice. Stephanie also started on a new client project that Joël has already been working on for many months. They talk about onboarding. This episode is brought to you by Airbrake (https://airbrake.io/?utm_campaign=Q3_2022%3A%20Bike%20Shed%20Podcast%20Ad&utm_source=Bike%20Shed&utm_medium=website). Visit Frictionless error monitoring and performance insight for your app stack. Julia Evan's Wizard Zines (https://wizardzines.com/) Why's Poignant Guide To Ruby (http://poignant.guide/) Learn You A Haskell For Great Good (http://www.learnyouahaskell.com/) Mazes for Programmers (http://mazesforprogrammers.com/) thoughtbot dotfiles (https://github.com/thoughtbot/dotfiles) rcm (https://github.com/thoughtbot/rcm) Transcript: AD: thoughtbot is thrilled to announce our own incubator launching this year. If you are a non-technical founding team with a business idea that involves a web or mobile app, we encourage you to apply for our eight-week program. We'll help you move forward with confidence in your team, your product vision, and a roadmap for getting you there. Learn more and apply at tbot.io/incubator. JOËL: Hello and welcome to another episode of The Bike Shed, a weekly podcast from your friends at thoughtbot about developing great software. I'm Joël Quenneville. STEPHANIE: And I'm Stephanie Minn. And together, we're here to share a bit of what we've learned along the way. JOËL: So, Stephanie, what's new in your world? STEPHANIE: So I got a very exciting package in the mail the other day that I wanted to share with you. So I think I've mentioned her on the pod before, but I got a package of software development-related zines by Julia Evans, and I'm going to share a few of the titles that I got. So I picked up, "Oh shit, git!" [laughs] Can I swear on this podcast? I don't know. I guess we're going to find out. Or maybe we can just make the executive decision that it's fine. [laughs] I also got "Hell Yes! CSS!", "The Pocket Guide to Debugging," which I think I mentioned previously. I had seen the PDF version before, but now I have this cute, little, I don't know, six-inch book that I can carry around for all of my debugging needs. Who knows? Maybe I'll be out in the world and just need to pull it out [laughs] and debug something while I'm on the train; who's to say? And then I also picked up "HTTP: Learn Your Browser's Language!" So I'm really excited to have these little illustrated digest-sized resources. I think they'll look really cute on my shelf next to my more intense hardcore technical books like "Design Patterns" and "Practical Object-Oriented Design in Ruby" or whatever. I'm really excited about the more creative endeavors people have done with creating educational resources about software development. In fact, I think last time when we talked about creativity and creative expression, we totally missed the world of side projects. And I've really just enjoyed when people illustrate things and make stuff a lot more accessible to a wider audience than a traditional textbook or more text-based heavy resources. JOËL: I love when people go for a bit more of the playful or quirky when dealing with technical topics. And this is a great example. I love Julia Evans' work. But I'm also reminded of things like "Why's (poignant) Guide to Ruby," "Learn You a Haskell for Great Good!" or even...I forget the title of it. But there's a book by...I think it's Jamis Buck on mazes. And it's told in this sort of quirky style in a narrative. But it's all about maze-solving algorithms but told through the eyes of characters who are wandering through a maze, and it's just delightful. STEPHANIE: Aww, that's so cute. I love that. I also just had the thought that these things would make great gifts for a fledgling developer or a developer in your life who, if you don't want to get them something super specialized or technical or whatever. There are so many, like you said, quirky and fun things out there that I'm sure they'll appreciate. So, Joël, what's new in your world? JOËL: I play D&D regularly with some colleagues at thoughtbot. And recently, I got to thinking about the mechanics of rolling dice. Specifically, what dice can be rolled together? Like, can I roll multiple dice at the same time? And which one do you have to wait for the outcome of a previous roll before it makes sense to roll it? That was really interesting to me because I think that connects to a lot of other things that we do in software, where sometimes some things are independent. You can do them at the same time. And then, other times, you have to wait for the outcome of the first thing before you can even start doing the second thing. So I think, in many ways, it's a great metaphor for the difference between parallel versus series operations. STEPHANIE: I think it's very funny that you found a way to connect D&D to software development. I'm just imagining you rolling your die and then while you're doing that, having some revelation like the math lady meme or whatever, just thinking about, whoa, if this outcome happens, then [laughs] what happens? I have not joined in on our company's D&D campaign, but I do like that y'all post little updates about the story in a public space for the whole company to check out. So sometimes I've been searching for some message in our company's knowledge base, and I have stumbled upon a post about the campaign so far and what happened in last night's session, you know, how all the adventurers fought the big bird, [laughs] and it is very delightful to me. JOËL: It's a really fun way, I think to be creative. I think I enjoy the role-playing side of it a little bit more than just the mechanics of rolling dice, even though the thing I was excited to share today is rolling dice is fun. It is kind of like doing improv, where you're trying to figure out what would your character do and how do they respond to what other people say? It's fun, but it's hard. STEPHANIE: One burning question I have is, does anyone do voices for their characters? JOËL: Absolutely. Aji Slater, who was on a previous episode of this podcast, is part of this campaign, and their character has some really fun voices. STEPHANIE: That's awesome. I'm really interested in joining as a guest or something. But yeah, the improv aspect of it kind of freaks me out. I bet it's a really welcoming group. And if other people are getting into it, then I can get into it too. JOËL: Yeah, this group is very, very low-key. Most people playing, I think, are fairly new to the game. So it's very friendly, very kind of tolerant of, oh, you didn't know this rule existed, that's totally fine. We'll make it work, things like that. STEPHANIE: Nice. So another recent development in my world is that I started a new client project, actually the same client that you've been working on for many months, Joël. JOËL: Yes, the same client but different teams within the client. So we don't get to necessarily interact with each other day to day. But it is interesting that now we get to share knowledge about how this application works with each other. STEPHANIE: Yeah, yeah. And I don't think we've gotten a chance to work together even in the same world like this before. So that's kind of exciting. JOËL: How has the onboarding been for you? STEPHANIE: So, one onboarding development that was surprisingly easy and felt good was setting up a new laptop. So the client company shipped a laptop to me to use for all of their work. And I had to set up just the laptop from scratch, so I could develop on it. And I was able to do that pretty painlessly with the help of the dotfiles that I had previously put together and all of the configurations that I had exported and uploaded to like a cloud drive. And so I was able to have that up and running within a day with all of my favorite keyboard shortcuts, applications, all my little preferences, and that felt really good. So I'm going to pat myself on the back [laughs] for past Stephanie's efforts in making current Stephanie's life easier. JOËL: I'm curious, do you use thoughtbot's dotfiles as the base for your development environment, or do you use something custom? STEPHANIE: I have my own personal dotfiles that I have in a GitHub repo. But I think I did, at one point, go through thoughtbot's dotfiles for inspiration. I found that it has just a lot of extra stuff that I don't really need, but I do like that it's out there. So if any folks want a place to start with having a laptop setup configuration, you should definitely check that out. And we can link that in the show notes. JOËL: I really like the tool rcm, which is also by thoughtbot that allows you to have a modular system of dotfiles that you can pull from a few different sources and combine together. STEPHANIE: Oh, that's neat. I hadn't known about that one. That's cool. JOËL: It's a suite of command-line tools that allows you to pull probably from a git repo. And it might be several, and then trying to pull them all to the right place on your machine to be executable. So, in my case, I have the thoughtbot dotfiles and then also some personal ones. And it just kind of merges them together based on some rules and creates all the dotfiles in my home directory for that. STEPHANIE: Nice. I think the one thing that I do need to keep up on is pushing updates to the dotfiles when I make changes locally because I did have to pull in a few things that I had adjusted or made tweaks to that didn't make it to the source that I was pulling from on this new machine. This is actually my fifth MacBook that I own [laughs] just from remnants of jobs and clients' past. And one day...I keep telling myself that I'll have to return one of the older ones that I'm not using anymore, but as of now, I am an owner of five computers. [laughs] JOËL: Just start mining Bitcoin on the idle ones. STEPHANIE: Oh. [laughs] That's genius. I guess that's definitely a better use than them just sitting in my drawers. JOËL: I guess you're paying for power, and that's kind of the whole point, so... STEPHANIE: That's fair. JOËL: What are some things that you like to do when you onboard onto a new project? STEPHANIE: So, aside from my laptop adventures, when I joined this new project, I had a few things in mind that I wanted to achieve during this onboarding process. One of the things I think I want to get better at is understanding the business when I'm onboarding onto a new client. I think this is an area that previously I hadn't really focused on, but I'm now understanding is actually really important to being set up for success on a team. And so, as consultants, we're dropped into a client project oftentimes when things are already moving. And they kind of clearly have some things that they were hoping we could help with. But I am hoping to also use this time to just take a bit of a step back and ask questions about, like, what is the product? And what are its core features? And who are its users? And also, what's the direction of the business? Can I get some more context on how things are right now? We're so frequently brought in and being like, okay, like, you're going to work on this project but without the context of is the business scaling right now, or what are its struggles? We aren't quite able to make as informed decisions as we could if we had been at the company for longer and had just seen things change and had more of a feel of why we're doing what we're doing. JOËL: I love that you're asking all those questions upfront. I feel like coming in onto a new project, and that can be as a consultant, or it could be just starting a new job, is the perfect time to just be asking all of those questions. And people, I think, appreciate when we ask those questions. Sometimes I think as consultants; we can sometimes be afraid that, oh, if we're asking these sorts of basic questions, people might think less of us. But I think the opposite happens where because we're asking those foundational questions about the business model, about the future of the product, about how the technical architecture works, people really appreciate that we're asking those foundational questions where other people might not. So it actually helps build credibility rather than hurting credibility. STEPHANIE: Yeah, and I think they are really important in making the right technical decision, too, because it can help inform where you spend your time refactoring or evaluating whether this shortcut is worth it to meet this deadline or if it's not because of the bigger picture and where things are headed. If anything, I've learned that being a developer really isn't just about being in the code but having as much information as possible so that there is less ambiguity and you have more clarity to make the right choices when you do have to write the code. Another key aspect that I have become a lot more observational about, I think, is understanding the team that I'm joining, especially what their process is, how they communicate. One thing that's kind of funny about seeing a lot of different companies and how they work as consultants is they might claim to use agile, but in reality, it is a little bit different than that. And you can have that perspective as an outsider. Things like pointing an estimation is kind of all over the place in the industry. So I really like to make sure I fully understand how the team does that and what points means to them. I think another thing that I want to do during my onboarding time this week and as I'm getting to know developers on the client side is learning about the pain points that they're feeling. And, yeah, just getting more of a feel about what's top of mind for them and where is a good space to invest my time and my energy. Lastly, some more basic stuff is communication. Another thing about being a contractor that's challenging is that we don't normally get the full onboarding experience that full-time hires do. And so we may or may not have an onboarding mentor or a buddy and finding out, okay, who is the right person that I should be asking questions to? Or where's the right space for that? When you join new teams, are there any other things that you like to take into consideration? JOËL: I like that you talked about understanding the team's process. One thing that I often like to do pretty early on is make some kind of small code change but then have it go through the full process of coding on my machine to deploy it in production. And so just find some small change in the code that needs to be done, and maybe it's an easy bug fix or something. But just so I can walk through all the steps and find out what the team's process is. What are some sort of weird things that this team does that other people might not that I need to know about? Where does review happen? Is there a staging environment, unexpected ways which my change might get rejected? Things like that. So walking through the entire, I guess you could say software development lifecycle, kind of speedrunning is, I think, a really valuable exercise to do really early on a new project. STEPHANIE: Yeah, that's a great point. Like I mentioned, I think that looks so different for every team. And I'm now learning about new tools and SaaS products that I have never seen before. And even though I have an understanding of the software development lifecycle in general, just learning those quirks is very valuable so that you can be a contributor as soon as possible. JOËL: I like to contribute on day one, if possible, so kind of in order of...I don't want to say order of priority. But the order of things that I often do on a new project is one, clone the repo, try to run the setup script, or manually step through instructions in the README. Depending on the repo, that might be 10 minutes. That might be all of my first day. Number two, try to run the test suite. STEPHANIE: Yes. JOËL: Number three is figure out what went wrong for me in step one or two, make a fix for it, commit it, and open up a PR for it, and that's my contribution. If I can do those three things on day one, I feel like that is a solid first day. STEPHANIE: That's great. I love that. What can you do to help improve this process and make it just a little bit better for someone else? I think another good first-day task might be automating a part of that process that is currently manual and kind of annoying. MID-ROLL AD: Debugging errors can be a developer's worst nightmare...but it doesn't have to be. Airbrake is an award-winning error monitoring, performance, and deployment tracking tool created by developers for developers that can actually help cut your debugging time in half. So why do developers love Airbrake? It has all of the information that web developers need to monitor their application - including error management, performance insights, and deploy tracking! Airbrake's debugging tool catches all of your project errors, intelligently groups them, and points you to the issue in the code so you can quickly fix the bug before customers are impacted. In addition to stellar error monitoring, Airbrake's lightweight APM helps developers to track the performance and availability of their application through metrics like HTTP requests, response times, error occurrences, and user satisfaction. Finally, Airbrake Deploy Tracking helps developers track trends, fix bad deploys, and improve code quality. Since 2008, Airbrake has been a staple in the Ruby community and has grown to cover all major programming languages. Airbrake seamlessly integrates with your favorite apps to include modern features like single sign-on and SDK-based installation. From testing to production, Airbrake notifiers have your back. Your time is valuable, so why waste it combing through logs, waiting for user reports, or retrofitting other tools to monitor your application? You literally have nothing to lose. Head on over to airbrake.io/try/bikeshed to create your FREE developer account today! STEPHANIE: So once you've cloned the repo and you're poking around the codebase, what are some things that you notice when you're looking at the code? JOËL: Ooh, that's always fun. In a Rails application, there are a few files I almost always open first in a new project just to get a feel for it. Number one is the routes file. What does that look like? Is it huge? Is it small? Are there a lot of non-standard routes in there, not just standard RESTful resources? That's going to tell me a lot about how things are structured. I can probably even get a sense of what controllers are large, what controllers have 20 non-RESTful actions in them just by looking at the routing file. The other place I like to look at is the user model. Generally, that just collects so many methods. And so I can also often get a feel about the app just by looking at that. And then from there, it's pulling on connections and trying to say, okay, well, what seems to be the core model of this app that everything coalesces around? And maybe for an e-commerce app, it's some kind of product, or maybe for an insurance product, it might be some kind of policy object. And so you find that, and then you find all of the core business logic around there. And that can often give you a really good picture of what the app is like. STEPHANIE: Yeah, a few other things I would add to that list of things to check out is the Gemfile. I like to look at that to see what gems are familiar to me. Do they have authentication, common authentication gems that I've used before? Or is there a lot of stuff that's new to me? And it also kind of tells you, are they more likely to reach for a library or try to build something themselves? I liked that you mentioned that you try to run the test suite early on. I think test coverage is a good place to investigate as well if they have any metrics, you know, that also tells you that it is or isn't something they value. And then seeing like, okay, what parts are well-tested and what parts are a little less tested? I'm really glad that you pointed out how much information you can glean about controllers because then, once you're poking around in there, that can tell you a lot about where are the scary parts of the app? I've found that to be really interesting. You know, sometimes you can just open up a file and be like, whoa, [laughs] and have kind of a gut reaction. Other times, you might pick it up from other developers, and you might start hearing about areas of the app that they are a little nervous to touch. JOËL: I definitely connect with that. I feel like many products have a particular file that is kind of scary and that people don't want to touch. And sometimes, people will tell you upfront, sometimes, you just discover it yourself. And I've been on projects where it's like, oh no, we have a ticket that's come up. It's fairly straightforward, except we know whoever picks it up is going to have to touch the scary file, and I'm not it. STEPHANIE: Yeah, absolutely. JOËL: I'm curious if you run any kind of automated tooling to try to understand a little bit more about the code. So I'm thinking things like maybe Flog or Flay or some of those tools to get a feel for maybe what are the hotspots in the application, anything like that that you like to look for? STEPHANIE: That's a great point. I think the only times I have invested energy into doing that has been more when I'm doing a code audit for a client, which, in some cases, is a separate service that clients can pay consultants for. But I can see the value of doing it when you're joining a team for the first time. JOËL: In a sense, I almost feel like we do a kind of abbreviated code audit for ourselves as part of onboarding. STEPHANIE: That's fair. I wonder if you can use those tools and scope it in a way to the particular team or areas in the codebase that you know that you'll be working on. JOËL: You mentioned the Gemfile earlier. And one thing that maybe seems super obvious is checking version numbers for things like Rails and Ruby because that will significantly impact how development is going to work. Is this a Rails 3 app, or is this a Rails 7 application? STEPHANIE: Yeah, yeah, that's a great point. I am glad you mentioned that because I think that's probably the very first thing [laughs] that I would do just to set my expectations around what I'm working with. JOËL: I feel like it's one of those things that's often just told to you when somebody helps you onboard. It's like, "Okay, you can clone the repo. It's over here. By the way, this is a Rails 3 app. We're kind of behind the times. Here are some weird things we've had to do to keep it alive. We have this other team. They're in this back room over there, slowly working on a Rails 4 upgrade. It's been in progress for four months, but we think we're pretty close. Can't wait for Rails 4." STEPHANIE: Oh God. [laughs] I think the alternative is a developer being like, "Oh yeah, we just upgraded to Rails 7," and they're all really excited and feeling really good about it, [laughs] as they should be, because I think that Rails upgrades are an important thing to stay on top of. And it is really great when you are working on a project that gets to be up to date there. JOËL: Yeah, Rails upgrades are interesting because I feel like when you're proactive about them, they're not that bad, especially more modern versions. I think Rails has gotten a lot better about making those upgrades smoother today than they were ten years ago. But when you're not up to date about them, when you've just kind of procrastinated on doing the updates, every month or year that you wait to do the update makes it so much harder to do that update when the time comes. Because now more gems have fallen out of date, more things have now been abandoned that you just can't use. A lot of community knowledge is just not around as much anymore. Because Rails 3...I forget when Rails 4 came out, probably about ten years ago. So people who remember how things were done idiomatically ten years ago, some of that knowledge has kind of passed on. It's not as prevalent as knowledge around Rails 6 or Rails 7 is. STEPHANIE: 100%. I think I heard someone at thoughtbot identify themselves as a post-Rails 5 generation developer. And I loved that because it really tells you a lot about just their experience. And it's kind of fun. I can imagine some kind of BuzzFeed quiz or something that's like, what Rails generation are you? But yeah, I've certainly seen pro-con lists about joining different projects, and a con might be the app is still on Rails 3. And then, if the app is on a very new version of Rails, that's usually in the pro column because folks are excited about getting to have all that good, new stuff. What do you look out for in terms of design patterns in a codebase? Is that something that kind of sets off your radar at all? JOËL: One thing that will definitely make me raise an eyebrow is heavy use of metaprogramming. I've been bitten by that a lot on projects. Some things are way too clever by half. So a lot of metaprogramming typically means it's going to be difficult to read and follow the flow of logic in the code. And also, there might be some unexpected bugs. Or I found once a memory leak that happened because of some weird metaprogramming. So that definitely makes me a little bit skeptical of part of the code. STEPHANIE: Yeah, that's fair. And it also just makes it hard to understand the domain when you have no idea where things go. And you have to just find out later when you are debugging and are in the middle of desperately trying to figure out how this app works. So I can see how that is a little suspicious. I think one thing that I am reevaluating for myself when I notice design patterns is trying to figure out, do I want to perpetuate them? Do I want to follow them? And in the past, I have been more likely to just follow an existing pattern in the codebase. But one thing that I'm hoping to do moving forward is to simply ask, how do decisions get made around patterns? Who gets to introduce them? Are they documented? What does that process look like? Do you have a conversation with the team about it? Just so that I have more tools in my toolbox, I think if I ever do find something that I feel really strongly about, that should be different than what I'm seeing in the codebase. So kind of expanding my skill set there. JOËL: I think that's a fantastic question to ask, and I've done this on previous projects. And sometimes, the answers are just absolutely illuminating. So you see a weird pattern, and you ask, like, "Oh, where does that come from? Why do we do that?" And some will say," Oh yeah, that was Bob back in, you know, 2017. He read an article and was really a fan of this thing, and he put it everywhere. Nobody else really understood the pattern, but we haven't really been able to change it. And he's no longer with the company, and now we just kind of...it's there." Or sometimes it's like, "Oh, great question because you see, we have this subtle business problem. And we've got to reconcile these two pieces of technology with also this expectation that our customers have. And so we came across this pattern, and we decided to use it." And it's these things where just looking at the code with no context, you're like, that's weird. Why would you want to do that? And then, when you understand the underlying problem, it makes so much sense. It's like, okay, I don't love this pattern, but it's the correct solution here, and I fully support having that here. It's a tricky problem at the intersection of technological problems and business problems, and this was the best way we could solve it. I'm not always super happy, but it is the right choice. STEPHANIE: Yeah, I've heard someone describe that as code archaeology in a way that all codebases have a story to tell about how they got to the current state that they're in. And I have certainly struggled with this but trying to approach joining a new team and working on a new codebase, especially if it's legacy code, from a place of curiosity rather than being combative about it. And just going through the git commits or just simply asking members of the team, like, "Hey, what's going on here?" and getting to hear some of those fun stories. JOËL: Yeah, most code exists for a reason. It's not just people writing things just because, particularly code that, you walk in as an outsider and think, oh, that's bad code or looks weird. It's usually for a reason. People aren't just purposefully writing this to trigger you two years down the road. It's also important...as a new person onboarding onto a project, people care about your perspective. As an outsider, oftentimes, it's really rich to bring in an outside perspective. But it's also not a great look to come in and just immediately be like, "Oh, we need to tear this thing down," or "This is so bad." It's important to build trust with the team. And as with so many things in life, seek to understand before running your mouth. STEPHANIE: Wow, how insightful, Joël. [laughs] Speaking of building trust, can we talk a little bit about different strategies we have for doing that? JOËL: Yeah. As a new person on the team, you really want to build a strong connection with the client and to build that trust because then you can be more effective in doing your job. You can bring more value to the client. What are some ways that you like to get that moving in a positive direction early on a new project? STEPHANIE: I think setting up channels of communication is really important, so, ideally, having a one-on-one with a manager or a team lead because that is a great place to make sure that the work you're doing is aligned with what they think you should be doing. So figuring out what their expectations are, like, what do you expect me to get done in my first week? And then what do you want me to be doing by the first month? That is important because we might think about all the things we would love to improve about this codebase or like influence on the team. But if that is not lined up with their views of what success looks like, then we're not quite delivering on the value that we [laughs] had hoped that we would. Another thing that I'm starting to notice a lot more, and we talked a little bit about this previously when we talked about the value of sustainability in web development, but learning what the team's values are and also what the organization's values are because that will really inform the behavior of folks on the team and the decisions that they make. So some values that come to mind are transparency, or collaboration, or growth, or speed. Like, if you find out those underlying foundational pillars, that can really help you orient yourself in your work and being like, okay, I know that this organization really focuses on these kinds of things, so I would like to try to make decisions that uphold or are in line with the things that are important to them. JOËL: I want to really second your comment about good communication. That is one of the most powerful things you can do to build credibility to build trust with another human being, and that can happen in a lot of ways. Like you're saying, some of it is setting up actual communication channels with a manager. Some of that can be the things we mentioned earlier, like asking questions about the architecture, trying to learn all about the product and the business. That can also be being active in that particular team's Slack channel. Sometimes new people come on to a team, and they're a little bit more timid, and they're just kind of not present. And so kind of coming in and...like, you don't want to take over the channel but being active in the channel, asking your questions in that channel, even just talking about your onboarding experience being like, "Hey, I'm running through...I got stuck on this thing. Here's the thing I did to get unstuck." People love seeing that. And it helps them to feel like you're actively participating from day one. STEPHANIE: Yes, that is a great transition to what I wanted to make sure to say at the end of this is that your onboarding experience matters. I know that when you're joining a new team, you might feel a lot of pressure to start contributing and make sure that you are providing value. But your onboarding experience should be inclusive, and you should advocate for your needs. Like, if you don't have access to credentials or there are just various blockers to your onboarding, that's a big deal, and it should not be a gatekeep-y process. Everyone wants you to be able to do your job, and so if you're running into those issues, it's definitely important to raise those concerns for yourself and also for anyone else who comes along the way. Also, everything is new, and will probably feel uncomfortable. If you're anything like me, I feel a lot of pressure to prove myself when I join a new team and start contributing left and right. But it's just important to remember that when all this stuff is new, feeling uncertain or feeling confused and just being in that beginner's mindset again can be uncomfortable, but that is totally normal. JOËL: I feel like something I sometimes do that ties all of these ideas together is when I'm encountering some new code or a new problem, to help myself understand it, I will diagram it. But oftentimes, it can be nice to share that diagram in the team's Slack channel and to say, "Hey, I'm new to the project, and I was exploring this area, and I kind of diagrammed it." Just talk a little bit about the thing that you're doing and maybe what you learned about it. People love that. Visuals are a really powerful tool. And you might be surprised that there might be some team members that have been on the project for a while who never really understood that part of the code. And so they will latch on to what you've shared and be like, "Oh, thank you, because now I finally have a feel for that part." Or maybe you didn't get it quite right, and somebody will follow up and say, "Hey, I love your diagram, but you have a misconception here. There's actually a different piece that connects here." And then you can have a conversation, and you just revealed a blind spot. And so I've found that that can be a really positive way to get started. STEPHANIE: Yeah, absolutely. Joël Quenneville, professional diagrammer. But even if you don't draw a diagram, putting your assumptions out into the world and how you understand things I think is really valuable because, yeah, it's like you are showing your learning path and also being open to receiving feedback if it's not quite right and, hopefully, spreading knowledge all around. So I love that. JOËL: This reminds me a little bit of the episode we had with Steve Polito about learning in public. And he was focused more on learning about Rails, and open source, and things like that. But there's a sense in which you can sort of learn the product or learn the codebase. And public means your team channel. So you can say, "Hey, I'm digging into this model, and here's how I understand the way things work. It's a bulleted list of three things." You might get some good comments on that. You might get other people who appreciate it. So kind of learning the internals of a product within the public confines of a team, I think, is a really good framework as well. STEPHANIE: Absolutely. JOËL: On that note, Shall we wrap up? STEPHANIE: Let's wrap up. Show notes for this episode can be found at bikeshed.fm. JOËL: This show has been produced and edited by Mandy Moore. STEPHANIE: If you enjoyed listening, one really easy way to support the show is to leave us a quick rating or even a review in iTunes. It really helps other folks find the show. JOËL: If you have any feedback for this or any of our other episodes, you can reach us @_bikeshed, or you can reach me @joelquen on Twitter. STEPHANIE: Or reach both of us at hosts@bikeshed.fm via email. JOËL: Thanks so much for listening to The Bike Shed, and we'll see you next week. ALL: Byeeeeeeee!!!!!!!! ANNOUNCER: This podcast is brought to you by thoughtbot, your expert strategy, design, development, and product management partner. We bring digital products from idea to success and teach you how because we care. Learn more at thoughtbot.com.

Antonio, Guillaume et Emmanuel discutent de licence Oracle pour Oracle JDK, de JEPs, de Flutter, d'Hibernate, de Mokito, de Kafka, de (not so) Big Data, du parsing de YAML, de ChatGPT, de licenciements, de platform engineering, et de nombres flottants. Enregistré le 10 février 2023 Téléchargement de l'épisode LesCastCodeurs-Episode–291.mp3 News Langages Oracle a changé une des licences de Oracle Java https://redresscompliance.com/oracle-java-licensing-changes-explaned-free/ plus d'utilisateurs nommé mais basé sur tous les employés et même les employés de vos soustraitant Bref, ca va faire cher et si vous itulisez plus de 50k processeurs, vous payez en plus Un autre article d'IDC https://blogs.idc.com/2023/01/30/oracle-java-subscription-changes-what-is-the-impact-to-customers/ Message a caractère informatif: il y a d'autres distributions de OpenJDK supportées de différents vendeurs ; ou la version non supportée InfoQ fait un résumé des dernières nouvelles Java, les mises à jour sur les JEPs, les dernières releases https://www.infoq.com/news/2023/01/java-news-roundup-jan23–2023/ sur Java specificquement des mises à jour de drafts autour du projet amber (primitive types in patterns etc) Une JEP pour discuter du future process des JEP (evolutions) JDK 20 en rampdown phase avec en nouvelles features: scoped values, record patterms, pattern matching for switches, virtual threads, structured concurrency - toutes en incubation ou preview https://www.infoq.com/news/2023/02/java-news-roundup-jan30–2023/ Le framework RIFE fait son grand retour ! Sortie de Go 1.20 https://go.dev/doc/go1.20 mais pas de gros changements, juste des améliorations de la toolchain, des librairies… Recap de la conférence Flutter Forward 2023 https://medium.com/@flutterqueen/flutter-forward–2023-recap–8f6da4876e3 Annonces de Flutter 3.7 et Dart 2.19 Amélioration de la performance graphique (utilisation de Impeller au lieu de Skia) Layout adaptatif Barres et sous-barres de menu Validation de release iOS Support de Material 3 Nouveaux widgets Support de ses propres shaders Facilitation de l'intégration native avec FFIgen et JNIgen Support de la 3D Support de WebAssembly Support de RISC-V Possibilité d'intégrer une app Flutter comme un élément HTML dans un page HTML Un toolkit spécifique pour les applis de News Côté langage Dart, il devrait bientôt y avoir du pattern matching Librairies Les bonnes pratiques d'accessibilité pour les applications en Flutter https://medium.com/flutter-community/creating-inclusive-apps-with-flutter-best-practices-for-accessibility-c7cebe0beb4d 4 grands thèmes dans l'article : l'accessibilité dans Flutter, les fonctionnalités intégrées à Flutter pour l'accessibilité, les meilleurs pratiques pour rendre les apps Flutter accessibles, et tester / débugguer l'accessibilité Flutter supporte le text contrast, les screen readers, les labels sémantiques, l'utilisation au clavier Comment logger les requetes Hibernate ORM https://www.adeliosys.fr/articles/hibernate-monitoring/ log brut via un logger les requetes lentes (plus lentes que n millisecondes) les metriques plus avancées (Statement, requetes, temps acquisition de connections, cache) Exposable via JMX le pool de connexion Sortie de Mockito 5, avec la possibilité de mocker des constructeurs, des méthodes statiques et des classes finales https://www.infoq.com/news/2023/01/mockito–5/ avant, c'était déjà possible de le faire avec mockito-inline mais maintenant c'est “out of the box” la version Java minimale passe de Java 8 à Java 11 Cloud Kubernetes Java client ajouté le support de kubernetes 1.25 https://www.infoq.com/news/2023/01/kubernetes-java-client/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=feed&utm_term=java ajout d'APIs dynamique pour faire du monitoring générique L'article montre l'API utilisée en alternative a certaines commandes kubectl fabric8 est une alternative Data Big data est mort https://motherduck.com/blog/big-data-is-dead/ fondateur de BigQuery Puis regardé comment les utiilsateurs utilisaent Big Query Et pas un probleme de big data Retour des moteurs classiques MySQL / PostgreSQL vs MongoDB etc la plupart des utilisaeur de big query etaient sous les 1Tb et 50% at 100GB ou moins doncle deluge de données n'est pas arrivé le shift moderne c'est de detacher le stockage du compute les données grossissent plus vite que les besoin en compute sur ces données la taille du workload est sur un petit sous ensemble de la taille des données entiéres (90% des requetes bigquery sont sur 100M de données) bases de données modernes sont force a travailler sur un sous ensemble des données pression pour scocker moins de données sur les equipes données sont requetees dans la journée, dans la semaine et ensuite rarement touchées donc big data = whatever doesn't fit on a single machine, est de moins en moins vrai map reduce en 2004 et machines de maintenant entre 2 et 4 ordre de grandeurs de RAM en plus avant on se foutait de supprimer des données mais GDPR et responsabilité pénales change la donne data putrefaction comme le bit rot questionnaire pour savoir si les prochaines generations de data processing seront suffisant pour vous distribution est une raison par contre Outillage Tous les soucis avec YAML https://ruudvanasseldonk.com/2023/01/11/the-yaml-document-from-hell article qui explique la complexité de YAML et ses incohérences Comparaison a la simplicité de JSON les commentaires JSON enlevés en 2005 parce que les gens mettaient des meta instructions pour les parseurs et l'implementation des commentaire était très complexe 22:22 est une nombre en base 60 vs 80:80 qui ne l'est pas (enleve en YAML 1.2 - **.png est invalide, ** est une reference vers une ancre - !.git est parsé différemment par les parseurs: ! est une echape pour exprimer un type natif du langage (e.g. Java) - ca veut dire que charger un YAML inconnu est non sûr - fr - de - no retourne ["fr", "de", no] le problème Norvège | changé en tre YAML 1./1 et 1.2 mais l;es parseurs gardent les anciens comportements:. Boolean: on, yes, y on: "let's go" est convertit en { "True": "let's go" } parce que on est boolean et accepté en clé non String dans YAML version: [ 9.5.1, 12.13] -> { "version": [ "9.5.1", 12,13 ] } les chiffres non echapé par un guillement syntax highlighting est donc dependant les templates dans yaml ca court a la cata altewrnatives: TOML, JSON, sous ensemble de YAML (toujours quoter les chaines) ChatGPT, on lui attribue plus de magie qu'il n'en a https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.03551.pdf un article scientifique mais de 8 pages seulement ChatGPT entant que large language models (LLM) et un prompt Engineering au dessus (le conversational agent) ChatGPT c'est une exécution du modèle Next Token Prediction C'est de la statistique brute mais excrément versatile dans ses usages Tendance à anthropomorphismes parce qu'on a passé la sensation de uncanny valley Considérant la distribution statistique des mots du corpus public, quels mots ont le plus de chance de venir après Pas de relation au monde, aux objets et aux interactions d'êtres partageant le même langage Pas des faits, ChatGPT ne sait pas, n'a pas d'intention C'est donc un outil génial pour éliminer un paquet du bullshit work de tous les jours, pas les gens qui le font Est-ce que les capacités sont émergentes ? LLM fondamentalement est hors du concept Le méta tutoriel sur le parsing avec Antlr https://tomassetti.me/antlr-mega-tutorial/ Couvre différents langages don't Java, Python, JavaScript et C# Explique les différentes phases de lexing, de parsing Comment résoudre les ambiguïtés avec les prédicats sémantiques Comment transformer du code Comment tester son parseur Et autre trucs et astuces Un tutoriel sur comment releaser un module Java avec Maven, JReleaser et Github Actions https://foojay.io/today/how-to-release-a-java-module-with-jreleaser-to-maven-central-with-github-actions/ montre le setup necessaire (clé GPG, pripriété du groupid, config maven etc montre comment faire la release à la main comment l'automatiser via GitHub actions Un tutoriel expliquant comment utiliser CRaC pour vos applis Java dans un conteneur https://foojay.io/today/how-to-run-a-java-application-with-crac-in-a-docker-container/ Coordinated Restore at Checkpoint (développé par Azul) Permet de créer des snapshots d'une application Java Pour qu'elle puisse être relancée rapidement après son démarrage, son warmup Une intro à Kafka en français https://blog.octo.com/kafka-repond-il-a-mon-besoin/ Maven 3.9 sorti https://lists.apache.org/thread/0tfr7t2j2ddbv4gjvxm47yohtk3dg6b3 https://maven.apache.org/docs/3.9.0/release-notes.html Java 8 nécessaire pour lancer Maven Pas mal de nettoyage de code et de dépendances pour préparer Maven 4. Certains plugins mal conçus (ex: qui ne déclare pas la dep plexus-util) peuvent être incompatibles. .mvn/maven.config dit désormais avoir 1 arg par ligne Maven avertit maintenant sur l'utilisation de plugins obsolètes, objectifs, paramètres, etc. Ajout de la prise en charge de l'invocation « mvn pluginPrefix:version:goal » et mise à jour des logs (pour simplifier le copier/coller). Ajout d'activation de profil par packaging. Maven 3.9.0 est désormais entièrement compatible avec la nouvelle ligne 3.x d'installation et de déploiement de plugins (les versions précédentes préviennent à ce sujet). Ajout du support du repo local partagé - https://maven.apache.org/resolver/local-repository.html#shared-access-to-local-repository Ajout de la possibilité de splitter le repo local (releases, vs snapshots…) et possibilité de gérer des workspaces - https://maven.apache.org/resolver/local-repository.html#split-local-repository Filtrage des dependences par repository - https://maven.apache.org/resolver/remote-repository-filtering.html Chained local repository (pour l'isolation entre “outer” and “inner” builds) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG–7612 Attention: Il y aurait une regression (10%) sur les perfs de gros projets - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG–7677 Les bisounours Méthodologies De operation engineering vers platform engineering https://www.infoq.com/news/2022/10/platform-devops-summary/ et quand le sysadmin devient de nouveau sexy grosse tendance et beaucoup de discussions autour du la platform engineering une plateforme imposée aux devs mais sexy donc c'est bon cette fois: plus serieusement customer focus - la fameuse developer experience Requilibrage entre dev vs ops puis devops plat et maintenant ceci. Sans enlever devops car devops amene une charge mentale lourde objectif developper la “core business value” et donc supporter cela avec une Internal DEveloper Platform Backstage est la GUI au dessus mais une IDP est plus profonde Infra Platform dev teams IDP: ne pas avoir a faire tourner l'infra (pour une equipe dev metier) Et cela permet d'ajouter des controles “entreprise”: cout, gouvernance etc C'est un pendule qui se reequilibre, mais n'oublions pas que les devs aime le jeu, comme les otaries. Pas pisser du code metier le plus vite possible. Est-ce que les IDP seront populaires, c'est la grande question un contre point dans l'articl;e: IDP are expensive and hard to do, offer a mediocre service at best, destroy velocity, and create bad incentives lié a la notion de golden path Sécurité Une liste de binaires Unix qui peuvent être utilisés pour bypasser des systèmes malconfigurés https://gtfobins.github.io/ apparemment même des images type distroless peuvent être affectées risques potentiels : accès à un shell, des privilèges élevés, transférer des fichiers, etc. Loi, société et organisation Twitter desactive l'API pour les clients qui n'affichent pas les pubs de Twitter (comme Tweetbot https://twitter.com/tweetbot/status/1613763746437947394) et paf le support de twitter sur ton ordi Ola Bini déclaré innocent https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/02/01/digital-rights-activist-ola-bini-declared-innocent-by-ecuadorian-court Arrété en 2019 en Equateur Accusé d'avoir eu access à des ordinateurs et des systemes de communication En même temps que Julian Assange était renvoyé de l'ambassage Equatorienne de Londres Il a fait 70 jours de prison Google a viré son équipe Open Source https://www.infoworld.com/article/3686511/google-blew-it-with-open-source-layoffs.html gros efforts autour de l'open sourcing (Kubernetes, Tensor flow) paie des dividendes viré par les tetes de gondoles mais ceux qui avaient fait des différences Open Source program, Google Summer of Code Grosse influeence interne qui se perd, risque pour le futur ca reste l'opinion de Matt Asay ( :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: ) Dans la saga Twitter, après l'arrêt des clients Twitter tiers, maintenant l'accès même à l'API va devenir payant https://twitter.com/twitterdev/status/1621026986784337922 donc par exemple, on ne pourra même plus créer des bots gratuitement, comme faire des annonces automatiques de release, etc ah bah merde c'est ce que je fais pour les cast codeurs :/ On peut rajouter son Mastodon sur son profil Github https://github.blog/changelog/2023–02–02-add-more-social-links-to-your-user-profile/ Pratique pour la vérification Mastodon ! On pouvait seulement mettre un lien vers Twitter, maintenant on peut avoir plusieurs profils de médias sociaux différents Rubrique débutant Julia Evans a écrit deux articles intéressants sur les problèmes avec les nombres flottants et avec les nombres entiers https://jvns.ca/blog/2023/01/13/examples-of-floating-point-problems/ https://jvns.ca/blog/2023/01/18/examples-of-problems-with-integers/ les problèmes classiques d'overflow le grand écart entre les grands nombres flottants des cas concrets de valeur approchée (proche à epsilon près), ou avec JavaScript qui interprète les entiers comme des flottants et du coup interprète mal des grands ID en JSON des clés primaires trop petites, les bizarreries de l'encodage des nombres signés ou non Quels sont les types de mémoires dans la JVM ? https://www.baeldung.com/java-jvm-memory-types Heap Stack Native Direct je pense que l'article a des incoherences, Ent ous cas native vs direct est mal expliqué. Un truc pas super clair mais plus clair est ici sur native vs direct: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30622818/what-is-the-difference-between-off-heap-native-heap-direct-memory-and-native-m c'est en gros direct vers du hardware (IO/ network etc) memory mapped file permet d'aller au dela de la limit e de memoire vive du systeme Conférences La liste des conférences provenant de Developers Conferences Agenda/List par Aurélie Vache et contributeurs : 9–11 février 2023 : World AI Cannes Festival - Cannes (France) 16–19 février 2023 : PyConFR - Bordeaux (France) 7 mars 2023 : Kubernetes Community Days France - Paris (France) 15–18 mars 2023 : JChateau - Cheverny in the Châteaux of the Loire Valley (France) 23–24 mars 2023 : SymfonyLive Paris - Paris (France) 23–24 mars 2023 : Agile Niort - Niort (France) 30 mars 2023 : Archilocus - Online (France) 31 mars 2023–1 avril 2023 : Agile Games France - Grenoble (France) 1–2 avril 2023 : JdLL - Lyon 3e (France) 4 avril 2023 : AWS Summit Paris - Paris (France) 5–7 avril 2023 : FIC - Lille Grand Palais (France) 12–14 avril 2023 : Devoxx France - Paris (France) 20–21 avril 2023 : Toulouse Hacking Convention 2023 - Toulouse (France) 27–28 avril 2023 : AndroidMakers by droidcon - Montrouge (France) 4–6 mai 2023 : Devoxx Greece - Athens (Greece) 10–12 mai 2023 : Devoxx UK - London (UK) 12 mai 2023 : AFUP Day - lle & Lyon (France) 25–26 mai 2023 : Newcrafts Paris - Paris (France) 26 mai 2023 : Devfest Lille - Lille (France) 27 mai 2023 : Polycloud - Montpellier (France) 31 mai 2023–2 juin 2023 : Devoxx Poland - Krakow (Poland) 31 mai 2023–2 juin 2023 : Web2Day - Nantes (France) 1 juin 2023 : Javaday - Paris (France) 1 juin 2023 : WAX - Aix-en-Provence (France) 7 juin 2023 : Serverless Days Paris - Paris (France) 15–16 juin 2023 : Le Camping des Speakers - Baden (France) 29–30 juin 2023 : Sunny Tech - Montpellier (France) 8 septembre 2023 : JUG Summer Camp - La Rochelle (France) 19 septembre 2023 : Salon de la Data Nantes - Nantes (France) & Online 21–22 septembre 2023 : API Platform Conference - Lille (France) & Online 2–6 octobre 2023 : Devoxx Belgium - Antwerp (Belgium) 12 octobre 2023 : Cloud Nord - Lille (France) 12–13 octobre 2023 : Volcamp 2023 - Clermont-Ferrand (France) 6–7 décembre 2023 : Open Source Experience - Paris (France) 31 janvier 2024–3 février 2024 : SnowCamp - Grenoble (France) 1–3 février 2024 : SnowCamp - Grenoble (France) Nous contacter Pour réagir à cet épisode, venez discuter sur le groupe Google https://groups.google.com/group/lescastcodeurs Contactez-nous via twitter https://twitter.com/lescastcodeurs Faire un crowdcast ou une crowdquestion Soutenez Les Cast Codeurs sur Patreon https://www.patreon.com/LesCastCodeurs Tous les épisodes et toutes les infos sur https://lescastcodeurs.com/

Stephanie shares that she's been taking an intro to basket weaving class at a local art studio, and it's an interesting connection to computer science. Joël eats honeycomb live on air and shares a video that former Bike Shed host Steph Viccari found from Ian Anderson. It's a parody to the tune of "All I Want For Christmas Is You," but it's all about the Ruby 3.2 release. In this episode, Stephanie and Joël shift away from literature and lean into art. Writing code is technical work, but in many ways, it's also aesthetic work. It's a work of art. How do you feel about expressing yourself creatively through your code? This episode is brought to you by Airbrake (https://airbrake.io/?utm_campaign=Q3_2022%3A%20Bike%20Shed%20Podcast%20Ad&utm_source=Bike%20Shed&utm_medium=website). Visit Frictionless error monitoring and performance insight for your app stack. Weaving, Computing, and the Jacquard Loom (https://www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/jacquard-loom) Ian Anderson's Ruby Christmas song (https://www.instagram.com/reel/CmAxL_ZNMOa/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y%3D) Dan McKinley's Boring Technology Club slides (https://boringtechnology.club/) Simple English Wikipedia (https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page) Geepaw Hill's Twitter thread about levels of thinking (https://twitter.com/GeePawHill/status/1565389543628480518) Julia Evans's debugging puzzles (https://mysteries.wizardzines.com/) Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow by Gabrielle Zevin (https://bookshop.org/p/books/tomorrow-and-tomorrow-and-tomorrow-gabrielle-zevin/17502475) Transcript: AD: thoughtbot is thrilled to announce our own incubator launching this year. If you are a non-technical founding team with a business idea that involves a web or mobile app, we encourage you to apply for our eight-week program. We'll help you move forward with confidence in your team, your product vision, and a roadmap for getting you there. Learn more and apply at tbot.io/incubator. JOËL: Hello and welcome to another episode of The Bike Shed, a weekly podcast from your friends at thoughtbot about developing great software. I'm Joël Quenneville. STEPHANIE: And I'm Stephanie Minn. And together, we're here to share a bit of what we've learned along the way. JOËL: So, Stephanie, what's new in your world? STEPHANIE: I'm really excited to share that I've been taking this intro to weaving class at a local art studio. I'm actually a few weeks in, and it's wrapping up soon. But one thing that I found really cool at the very first class was that the instructor mentioned that weaving was, in some ways, a predecessor or inspiration to modern computing. And he said that, and I got really excited because surely that meant that I would be good at this thing [laughs] and this craft, and then I promptly kind of forgot about it. But I was inspired the other night to look up this history to just learn more about weaving and its connection to computer science. And I learned that, in particular, the invention of something called the Jacquard loom really led to early computing machines because, basically, weaving involves threading horizontal and vertical fibers. And the way you do it if you thread the horizontal fiber, also called the weft, over or under the vertical fibers, called the warp, you get different patterns. And so with the Jacquard loom, this invention utilized punch cards as instructions for basically binary code, and that would tell the loom how to raise and lower those vertical threads, which would then lead to a beautiful pattern. And after that invention, this previously very laborious process became automated. And that also had a really big impact on the textile industry. And fabric became a lot more available at a much lower cost. So that was a really cool little history lesson for me. JOËL: That is really cool. So are you saying that punch cards, as we know them from early computing, were borrowed as a concept from the weaving industry? STEPHANIE: Yeah, that's at least what I've read. I can see now how complex weaving tapestries and patterns set the stage for more complex computations. And I don't know if I'm going to keep going down this weaving journey. I liked the intro class because it was very chill, and I got to use my hands. And I had a little bit of fun making, I don't know, like ten by 12-inch little tapestry. But yeah, I've definitely seen other more advanced weavers make really beautiful textiles and fiber arts. And it's really cool to see the application of that detail-oriented skill in different formats. JOËL: Are you going to try to make your own punch cards? STEPHANIE: That's an interesting evolution of this skill [laughs] for sure. I think what I really did like was the hands-on approach. And so the punch cards did make this process automated. But I personally enjoyed the switching of the threads and pulling them through and doing it with my hands instead of something that's kind of turned into automated machine work. Does that inspire you in some way? JOËL: I think sometimes it's interesting, right? As software people, we sort of have the two urges. We work in so much automation. When we see a process, we would love to try to automate it ourselves, even if it's been done before. So, oh, could I build a small, automatic mechanical loom using punch cards? That sounds like a fun automation challenge. At the same time, so much of my daily job is automation that sometimes it's nice to kind of remove automation entirely from the picture and, like you said, just work with your hands. STEPHANIE: That's a really interesting way to think about it. I do believe that people have different reactions to it, like you said, where they're like, "Wow, I can use my skills to do this really cool thing." On the other hand, you might also respond with, "Wow, I've done this automation code-writing work for eight hours. So now I really want to do something completely different." And I think that's the camp that I was in, at least when I first signed up for this class, just having space, like three hours a week, to sit and not look at a computer and deal with the physical realm. JOËL: So here's the other route that I think a lot of software people take, and that is, here's a fun mechanical process that can be automated. What if we simulated it virtually? So what if I create a program where you can sort of create your own punch card, like, decide where you want to punch the holes? And maybe these are just radio buttons or something or checkboxes in a grid on a webpage. And then, the program will output an SVG that is the thing that would have been woven if you'd used it in that pattern. And so now you can kind of play around with, like, huh, what if I punch here? What if I unpunch here? And you get all these patterns out, and you could just get to try it around. STEPHANIE: That's fascinating. I can't believe your brain went there. [laughter] But yeah, the idea that it's not actually about the pattern itself but the holes that you make, that part being the creative process and then what comes out of it then being a bit of a surprise or just something organic that's a really interesting take too. JOËL: Something that I find is really fun about software and things created from software is this sort of really short feedback loop in terms of trial and error. So if you were actually having a weaving machine and you made a physical punch card, and then you try something, and you realize it's not quite right, the machine weaved something you didn't quite like, now you've got to set it up again. You probably have to start from scratch with a new punch card because you can't really unpunch holes unless maybe you can put tape over it or something. That trial-and-error feedback loop is much shorter. Whereas with a program, you just pause the simulation, punch-unpunch some holes, restart, and then you just kind of keep trying. And there's something fun about that creative exploration when you've got that really tight feedback loop. STEPHANIE: That's fair. I think perhaps that actually might be why doing it manually, and by it, I mean weaving, gives you a little bit more room to [laughs] debug if you will, because you can see when something goes wrong. And this actually happened to me in class earlier this week where I didn't thread the fiber over instead of under. And I was like, oh, this doesn't look right. Like, that's not the look I'm going for. And then I could kind of quickly see, oh, I missed a thread over here and unravel and do it again. Whereas what you just described, if the punch card is wrong and then you create this big piece of fabric, at that point, I'm not really sure what happens then. If someone out there is a weaving expert and knows the answer; I would be very curious to know. JOËL: Now I kind of wish we'd had this conversation last month because, in early January, there was a game jam event that happened. It's a yearly or biyearly Historically Accurate Game Jam, and they select a theme, and then everybody has to submit a game, or a simulation, or something, an interactive program that fits with the theme. And this year's theme was the Industrial Revolution. And I feel like simulating an old automated loom with punch cards would be the perfect fit for something that's small enough that I could build it in a week without spending 10 hours a day working on it. It fits within the theme, and it's still kind of fun. STEPHANIE: Wow, that would have been a really great idea. If there was an award for best fitting the theme, I think that would have won because then you're also tackling the history of computing. I was talking about earlier the loom obviously being...or the automated loom also really playing a big role in the Industrial Revolution. And, I don't know, maybe this is our future club, Joël, and we're going to get into video game development. [laughs] What's new in your world, Joël? JOËL: There are two things. One is that today former Bike Shed host, Stephanie Viccari, shared a video with me from Ian Anderson. This was made last December to the tune of All I Want For Christmas Is You. But it's all about the, at that time, upcoming Ruby 3.2 release. It is amazing. The lyrics talk about the different features that are upcoming. It rhymes. It's set to meter. I am just blown away by this. And I'm just really hyped [laughs] about this video. STEPHANIE: You sent it to me and I gave it a watch before we sat down to record, and I also loved this video. It was so fun. And I think Ruby has a bit of a tradition of releasing new versions around Christmas time. So if this became a tradition, that would be very fun, and maybe instead of singing Christmas carols, we'll be singing new Ruby version carols around the holidays. JOËL: I feel like if Ian wants to do another one next Christmas, now that you have the precedent, it'd be a great space to try something to the tune of Last Christmas because now you can reference back last year's song. STEPHANIE: Yeah. I might as well just go all in and create a whole Christmas album of Ruby anticipation carols. [laughter] JOËL: Yeah, really excited about that. Kudos to Ian. And for all of our listeners, we'll link the video on the show notes of the podcast. Go and check it out; it is worth the two and a half-minutes of your life. STEPHANIE: Agreed. JOËL: The other cool thing, for the past few episodes, we've been talking a lot about hexagons and how they show up in nature, and bees, and how they build their honeycombs and whether that is sort of by design or sort of just happens by nature through sort of external forces. And so this week, I went out to the store, and I bought some real honeycomb. And I'm going to try it on air. STEPHANIE: [laughs] Oh my gosh, I didn't realize that's what was happening. [laughter] Okay, I'm ready. JOËL: All right, I'm going to take a slice. STEPHANIE: Wow. For research. JOËL: For science. STEPHANIE: Wow, that is a big bite. [laughs] JOËL: Hmmm, it's basically crunchy honey. STEPHANIE: So I've enjoyed honeycomb in that raw form on ice cream. I really like it on there and oatmeal and stuff like that. I think it's a little bit waxy. Like, once you get to chewing the bits at the end, that part is a bit of a less pleasant mouth-feel [laughs] in my opinion. What are you experiencing right now? JOËL: Yeah, so like you're saying, the honey kind of dissolves away in your mouth. You had this really fun mix of textures. But then, in the end, you do end up with a ball of [laughter] beeswax in your mouth. STEPHANIE: Oh no. JOËL: Which I understand is completely safe to eat, so... STEPHANIE: Yeah, that's true. JOËL: I'm just going to eat the whole thing. STEPHANIE: I think it's kind of like swallowing gum. [laughs] JOËL: Which apparently does not last for seven years in your digestive system; that's a myth. STEPHANIE: Wow, debunking myths, trying honeycomb. You're welcome, to all The Bike Shed listeners out there. Investigating the important things. JOËL: What is interesting is that we're talking about the structural power of hexagons. I can cut a pretty thin slice of the comb, and it doesn't fall apart. It still has a lot of strength to it, which is nice because it means that the honey doesn't just go splashing everywhere. I can cut up a fairly thin slice, pick it up, it still holds the honey, put it in my mouth, and it doesn't make a mess. STEPHANIE: The bees know what they're doing. [laughs] Cool. Would you eat raw honeycomb again? JOËL: Well, I got a whole block, and I had one tiny slice. So, yes, I will be eating the rest of this. STEPHANIE: [laughs] JOËL: I don't think this will be a regular thing in my weekly groceries. But I would bring this out again for a special occasion. Or I can see this fitting nicely, like you said, on maybe certain breakfasts, even on a charcuterie board or something. STEPHANIE: Oh yeah, that's a really good use for it. JOËL: In some ways, it's nice because it's a way to have honey without having to have it on something else or having to eat it with a spoon. It's honey that comes with its own carrying vessel. STEPHANIE: That's great. Yeah, like a bread bowl for soup. [laughs] JOËL: Exactly. Bees make their own bread bowls for honey. STEPHANIE: [laughs] MID-ROLL AD: Debugging errors can be a developer's worst nightmare...but it doesn't have to be. Airbrake is an award-winning error monitoring, performance, and deployment tracking tool created by developers for developers that can actually help cut your debugging time in half. So why do developers love Airbrake? It has all of the information that web developers need to monitor their application - including error management, performance insights, and deploy tracking! Airbrake's debugging tool catches all of your project errors, intelligently groups them, and points you to the issue in the code so you can quickly fix the bug before customers are impacted. In addition to stellar error monitoring, Airbrake's lightweight APM helps developers to track the performance and availability of their application through metrics like HTTP requests, response times, error occurrences, and user satisfaction. Finally, Airbrake Deploy Tracking helps developers track trends, fix bad deploys, and improve code quality. Since 2008, Airbrake has been a staple in the Ruby community and has grown to cover all major programming languages. Airbrake seamlessly integrates with your favorite apps to include modern features like single sign-on and SDK-based installation. From testing to production, Airbrake notifiers have your back. Your time is valuable, so why waste it combing through logs, waiting for user reports, or retrofitting other tools to monitor your application? You literally have nothing to lose. Head on over to airbrake.io/try/bikeshed to create your FREE developer account today! JOËL: So, for the last couple of weeks, we've been joking that this is turning into the Stephanie and Joël book club because we've been talking about a lot of articles and books. Today, I'd like to shift a little bit away from literature and lean into art. Writing code is a technical work, but in many ways, it's also an aesthetic work. It's a work of art. How do you feel about the idea of expressing yourself creatively through your code? STEPHANIE: So this is interesting to me because it's actually quite different from what we've been talking about in recent episodes around the idea of writing sustainable code, code for other people to read. Because if you are writing code purely for creative expression and just for yourself, that will look very different than what I think folks have kind of called boring technology, which is choosing the patterns, the tools, the frameworks that are tried and true, and just kind of sticking to the things that people have solved before. And so, in some ways, I don't know if I really get to express myself creatively in the code that I write, which I think is okay for me because I don't really consider myself someone who needs a creative outlet in my work. What about you? What thoughts do you have about this? JOËL: I think it's interesting the way you described it. I'm almost wondering if I'm making maybe a comparison to physical architecture; maybe you almost have a sort of brutalist perspective on the things you construct. STEPHANIE: [laughs] JOËL: So they're functional. They're minimal. They are not always the prettiest to look at, but they're solid. Does that metaphor sound about right to you? STEPHANIE: I feel like I have to make a pun about SOLID, the design patterns, and code. JOËL: Ooh. STEPHANIE: [laughs] But I think I like brutalist, I mean, the term itself. I don't know if I necessarily identify with it in terms of my work and output. But the idea that the code that I do is functional is, I think, particularly important to me as a developer. And I don't just mean, like, oh, the code works, so it's done, but functional for whatever need I'm solving and also for the people who are working with this code again in the future. I mentioned boring technology. There's a talk that I'm kind of referencing by Dan McKinley, and you can check out his slides at boringtechnology.club. And he talks about this idea of decision-making and how that relates to writing boring or creative code. And he also references Maslow's hierarchy of needs. And so, ideally, if you're working in an existing codebase, all the low-level decisions have been made for you. And then you can kind of traverse the hierarchy and focus your creativity on the high-level problems that you're trying to solve. So maybe you're not necessarily expressing your creativity in the syntax or whatever pattern you're using, again, because a lot of those things have been solved. But where the creativity comes from is the particular domain or business problem you have and the real-world constraints that you're faced with. And how do you figure out what to do given those constraints? JOËL: I think that lines up a lot with my own experience as well. I think as a newer developer, syntax is sort of the thing that's top of mind. And so, maybe trying to get clever with syntax is something that I would focus on more. Sometimes that's trying to get code really short and terse. Sometimes it's because I want to try. Can I do this thing with a particular piece of syntax, or even just does it look pretty? I think now, in my code, I am actually kind of boring with my syntax. I, probably when I write Ruby, mostly use a kind of slimmed-down set of syntax and don't use the full expressive power of the language for most of my day-to-day needs. So basic things with objects, and methods, and blocks, sort of the basic building blocks that we get from Ruby regular conditionals, if...else, and a few other nice things that the language gives us. But, in many ways, it almost feels like...I don't know if you've ever seen the simplified English Wikipedia. STEPHANIE: No, I haven't. What is that? JOËL: They're treating it, I think, like a separate language, but it is a version of Wikipedia in English with a more restricted vocabulary to try to make the content more accessible to those that might struggle with more standard English. So it's a sort of smaller subset of English. And, in many ways, I feel like a lot of the day-to-day Ruby code that I write is simplified, Ruby. STEPHANIE: Wow, that's really interesting. I think this also goes back to the specialized vocabulary episode we talked about. And is there value in keeping things accessible, and straightforward, and boring but at the cost of being able to express yourself with everything you have available to you? This is a bit of a tangent, I guess, but I grew up speaking Chinese with my parents, but since then, I have really lost a lot of that vocabulary. And, in some ways, I really struggle with communicating in Chinese because I feel like I'm not able to express myself exactly the way I want to in the way that I can in English. And when I'm talking to my parents, yeah, that's been a bit of a challenge for me because I do really value being able to say things the way that I mean, and I'm not able to have that with my limited vocabulary. So I can also see how people might not enjoy working within these confines of boring syntax and boring frameworks. JOËL: Sometimes it's nice to give yourself a sort of syntactical restriction, but they're very low-level when it comes to most of what we do for programming. And I think that's sort of what I've learned as my career has evolved is that programming is so much more than just learning syntax. So kind of like with art, maybe it's nice to restrict yourself to say, oh, can I do something with only a particular brushstroke technique, or restricting myself to a particular palette or a particular medium? And that can foster a lot of creativity. So, similarly, I think you could do some things like playing Code Golf, not on production code; please don't. STEPHANIE: [laughs] JOËL: But as an experiment in a side project or just almost as a piece of art, that can be a really interesting problem to solve and give you a deeper understanding of the language. And I'm sure there are plenty of other syntactical limitations you could put on yourself or maybe fancy things you would like to explore and say, "Well, this is over the top. We don't need to structure it in this way or use this syntax. But I want to sort of push the boundaries of what can be done with it. Let's see where I can take it." STEPHANIE: That's really fair. And I think it relates back to what I was saying earlier about perhaps creativity when writing software products comes from the constraints of the business of, in some ways, physical aspects of development. In the Dan McKinley talk, I mentioned about choosing boring technology. He generally recommends against bringing in a new language or framework because of the costs, the carrying cost of doing that, and the long-term maintenance to consider. But he instead suggests turning the question on its head and being like, how can we solve this problem with the current technology that we do have? And I think that relates to what you were saying about being able to push the boundaries of a particular medium or tool and in a way that you might not have considered before. JOËL: Exactly. And I think going back to the analogy with art; sometimes it is nice to restrict yourself to a particular brushstroke or something like that to try to foster creativity. But oftentimes, you want to explore creativity in much higher-level ways. So maybe you're not restricting things like brushstrokes and color, and, instead, you want to explore lighting. You want to explore maybe certain ways of mixing colors. There are all sorts of, I think, higher-level ways that you can be creative in art that's not just the mechanics of how you apply pigment to canvas. And we see the same thing like you were saying, in code where there's a lot of higher level business problems. Generally, how do we want to structure large chunks of the code? How do we want to build abstractions? Although that can also be a dangerous place to get too creative in. STEPHANIE: Yeah, absolutely. Do you consider yourself a creative person or need a creative outlet? And how does writing code or software development play a role in that for you? JOËL: I would say, yes, I consider myself a creative person. And I would consider coding, in general, to be a creative endeavor. I sometimes describe to people that writing code is like building something out of infinite legos. You're constrained only by the power of your imagination and the amount of time you're willing to put into constructing the thing that you're building. Of course, then you have all sorts of business constraints. And there are things you want to do on a work project that are probably not the same as what you would want to do on a client project or on a personal project. But there's still creativity, I think, at every level and sometimes even outside of the code itself. Just understanding and breaking down the business problem can require a ton of creativity before you even write a single line of code in your editor. I was reading a Twitter thread the other day by @GeePawHill that sort of proposes that there are sort of four steps in evolution of kind of the mindset that programmers go through over their career. And I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on this evolution if you kind of agree with it or disagree with it if that maybe lines up with some of your experience. So this Twitter thread proposes four levels of thinking that we go through. I think we can kind of jump between these levels at various points in our work. So we might do all of these in a day, but to a certain extent, they also follow a little bit of a progression in our career. So the first level is thinking in terms of syntax; that's just knowing the characters to type in the editor. The second level is thinking in terms of code, that's, thinking a little bit more semantically. So now, instead of thinking, oh, do I need if then curly brace, then closed curly brace? Now we're thinking more in terms of, okay, I need a branch in the flow of control for my logic here. And at that level, maybe you don't even need to think about the syntax quite so much because you're so comfortable with. It kind of just fades away. Building beyond that, now you're thinking in terms of your paradigm. So Ruby is an object-oriented language, so you might be thinking in terms of what objects do I need to represent this problem and how do they need to talk to each other? And the sort of underlying semantics of, oh, do I need a conditional here or not? Those might start fading away because now you're thinking at a slightly higher level. And then, finally, thinking in terms of change sets. Now you're thinking less in terms of the language itself and more in terms of the business problems and how the current behavior of the software is different and needs to change to get to where we want the behavior to be. STEPHANIE: I think I disagree a little bit with the idea that it's a progression. And I'm thinking about how when you have a beginner's mind, anything is possible. And in some ways, if you are new to coding, before you have that understanding of what is and isn't possible, anything is possible. And so, in some ways, I've worked with people who are super new to coding, and the ideas that they come up with for how to make a change at that highest level that you were just describing, in some ways, make sense. You can be like, oh yeah, that actually is something we can do and an idea that you might eventually get to from someone more experienced, having followed those different levels of progression and reaching a place where you're like, I know exactly what tools or the details about how to do this. But when you have that beginner's mind, and you don't have the details of the how, I think you can still think about those problems at a higher level, and that is valuable, and maybe they'll need help implementing along the way. And I think that that could be a really interesting area of collaboration that perhaps we don't do enough in this industry because it's very mentorship-focused where it's like, okay, I have more experience, and so I'm going to teach you what I know. Whereas if you bring someone with a totally fresh perspective along, what ideas can you generate from there? JOËL: I think we definitely exist in all of these layers every day as developers. I think, looking back at myself as a newer developer, I tended to maybe work bottom-up when I tried to solve a problem. And I think that now I probably tend to work sort of in the reverse order, start by thinking in terms of changes and then work my way down. And so syntax, at that point, is the last thing that I'm thinking about. It's really an implementation detail. Whereas I think as a new coder, syntax was super important. Was your experience similar to that, or did you have a very different journey? STEPHANIE: It's funny that you mentioned it because I think when I was new to development, there were so many syntactic things that I didn't understand that I just kind of like blurted out of my brain when I was reading code and was then trying to latch on to the important pieces of information that I needed to know, which often meant class names or method names. Pieces that I could grab onto and be like, okay, I'm seeing that this method then calls this other method or whatever. And, yeah, what you were saying about implementation details falling away, I kind of did that at the beginning of my career a little bit, at least at that syntactic level. So, yeah, I think I'm with you where we all exist at different parts of this framework, I suppose. And that journey could look different for everyone. JOËL: So we're talking about ways to be creative at higher levels. And one way that I find has been really fun for me but also really useful has been bringing in dependency graphs as a tool for design. You knew I had to mention dependency graphs. STEPHANIE: We got there in the end. [laughter] Cool, go on. JOËL: I think it's been really good sometimes in terms of modeling change sets because dependency graphs can be a great tool for that, but also sometimes in terms of trying to understand what the underlying business problem is and how it might translate into code structures where things might be tightly coupled versus not. And so, drawing it out visually is a really powerful design tool. And because now I can look at it in two-dimensional space, I can realize, oh, I see something that feels like it's maybe an anti-pattern or might be a problem here. There's a cycle in my graph; maybe we should find a way to break that. Maybe we need to introduce some dependency inversion and break that cycle, and now our graph is acyclic. And so I think that's where there can be a lot of creativity that happens, even when you're not writing code at that point. You're just sort of talking about how different pieces of the project or even different subproblems...you're not even talking about if they're implemented in code, but just saying this subproblem is related to this subproblem, and maybe I would like to find a way for them to not have a connection to each other. STEPHANIE: I'm glad we got back to this dependency graph topic because I stumbled upon something that I'm curious to hear your opinion on. I have been following Julia Evans' work for a little bit now. And she recently released a new zine about debugging. And at the end of the zine, she includes a link to these choose-your-own adventure puzzles that she has created, specifically to teach you about debugging and how to do it. And so it's basically a little detective game, and you kind of follow along with this bug. And she gives you some different options about how would you like to find a little bit more information about this bug? And what approach would you take? And you make some different selections, and then as you go, you get more information about the bug. And that helps inform what next steps you might take. And, one, I think this is a great example of a creative project about software development, even though it's not necessarily your day-to-day work. But then she also uses a tool called Twine, which is for creating non-linear stories, or puzzles, or games. And it got me really thinking about the multi-step wizard we've been talking about and this idea of looking at a problem in different mediums. It also reminds me of if you have a designer on your team and they're doing prototyping, they usually have some kind of user interactivity that they have to codify. And they are making those decisions about okay, like, if you are at this step, then where do you go next? And those are all things that you've talked about doing as a developer, I think, at a later point in the future lifecycle. And I'm now just kind of thinking about how to integrate some of that into our workflow. Do you have any thoughts about that? JOËL: I had one of the coolest experiences in my career when I was doing a front-end project where we were building a typeahead component that was pulling data from a remote server and then populating a drop-down. And the designer and I sat down and just started to look through all the different states that you could be and how you could move from one to another. So it looked like maybe you start the typeahead is empty; it's just a text box. And then as you start typing, maybe there's a spinner that shows up. And then maybe you have some results, or maybe you don't have results. And those are two different entirely states that you could be in. And then, if you backspace, what happens? And what if something goes wrong on the server? Like, we just kept finding all these edge cases. And we built out a diagram of all the possible journeys that someone could take, starting from that empty text box, all the way to either some sort of error state or a final state where you've selected an item. But, of course, these are not necessarily terminal because in an error state, maybe you can just start typing again, and you sort of jump back into the beginning of the flow. So we did this whole diagram that ended up looking very much like a finite-state machine. We didn't use the term, but that's kind of what it ended up being. And I think we both learned a lot about the problem we were trying to solve and the user experience we were trying to create through that. There was just a lot of back and forth of, like, oh, did you think about what would happen if we get no results here? Have we thought about that state? Or it's like, okay, so now we're in an error state. What do we do? Is there a way to get out of it, or are we just kind of stuck? Oh, you can backspace. Okay, what happens then? STEPHANIE: Yeah, I mean, we've been talking about creativity as a solitary process. But I think that that goes to show that when collaborating with other people, too, that process can also be very fun and creative and fulfill that need outside of the way the code is written. JOËL: In many ways, I think working with somebody else, and that gets made at the intersection of two or more people's work, is probably the most creative way to build software. STEPHANIE: That actually reminds me of a book I read last year called "Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow." And it's about these two friends and their journey creating video games together. And it kind of follows several decades of their life and their relationship, and their creative and collaborative process. And I really loved that book. It was very good, especially if you like video games. There are a lot of great references to that too. But I think what you were saying about that fulfillment that you can get with working with other people, and that book does a really good job examining that and getting into our need as humans for that type of collaboration. So that's my little book rec. It goes back to our conversation about designing a game. Again, maybe this is [laughs] what we'll do next. Who knows? The world's our oyster. On that note, shall we wrap up? JOËL: Let's wrap up. STEPHANIE: Show notes for this episode can be found at bikeshed.fm. JOËL: This show has been produced and edited by Mandy Moore. STEPHANIE: If you enjoyed listening, one really easy way to support the show is to leave us a quick rating or even a review in iTunes. It really helps other folks find the show. JOËL: If you have any feedback for this or any of our other episodes, you can reach us @_bikeshed, or you can reach me @joelquen on Twitter. STEPHANIE: Or reach both of us at hosts@bikeshed.fm via email. JOËL: Thank you so much for listening to The Bike Shed, and we'll see you next week. ALL: Byeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!! ANNOUNCER: This podcast is brought to you by thoughtbot, your expert strategy, design, development, and product management partner. We bring digital products from idea to success and teach you how because we care. Learn more at thoughtbot.com.

Watch on YouTube About the show Sponsored by Microsoft for Startups Founders Hub. Connect with the hosts Michael: @mkennedy@fosstodon.org Brian: @brianokken@fosstodon.org Michael #1: Jupyter Server 2.0 is released! Jupyter Server provides the core web server that powers JupyterLab and Jupyter Notebook. New Identity API: As Jupyter continues to innovate its real-time collaboration experience, identity is an important component. New Authorization API: Enabling collaboration on a notebook shouldn't mean “allow everyone with access to my Jupyter Server to edit my notebooks”. What if I want to share my notebook with e.g. a subset of my teammates? New Event System API: jupyter_events—a package that provides a JSON-schema-based event-driven system to Jupyter Server and server extensions. Terminals Service is now a Server Extension: Jupyter Server now ships the “Terminals Service” as an extension (installed and enabled by default) rather than a core Jupyter Service. pytest-jupyter: A pytest plugin for Jupyter Brian #2: Converting to pyproject.toml Last week, episode 314, we talked about “Tools for rewriting Python code” and I mentioned a desire to convert setup.py/setup.cfg to pyproject.toml Several of you, including Christian Clauss and Brian Skinn, let me know about a few tools to help in that area. Thank you. ini2toml - Automatically translates .ini/.cfg files into TOML “… can also be used to convert any compatible .ini/.cfg file to TOML.” “ini2toml comes in two flavours: “lite” and “full”. The “lite” flavour will create a TOML document that does not contain any of the comments from the original .ini/.cfg file. On the other hand, the “full” flavour will make an extra effort to translate these comments into a TOML-equivalent (please notice sometimes this translation is not perfect, so it is always good to check the TOML document afterwards).” pyproject-fmt - Apply a consistent format to pyproject.toml files Having a consistent ordering and such is actually quite nice. I agreed with most changes when I tried it, except one change. The faulty change: it modified the name of my project. Not cool. pytest plugins are traditionally named pytest-something. the tool replaced the - with _. Wrong. So, be careful with adding this to your tool chain if you have intentional dashes in the name. Otherwise, and still, cool project. validate-pyproject - Automated checks on pyproject.toml powered by JSON Schema definitions It's a bit terse with errors, but still useful. $ validate-pyproject pyproject.toml Invalid file: pyproject.toml [ERROR] `project.authors[{data__authors_x}]` must be object $ validate-pyproject pyproject.toml Invalid file: pyproject.toml [ERROR] Invalid value (at line 3, column 12) I'd probably add tox Don't forget to build and test your project after making changes to pyproject.toml You'll catch things like missing dependencies that the other tools will miss. Michael #3: aws-lambda-powertools-python Via Mark Pender A suite of utilities for AWS Lambda Functions that makes distributed tracing, structured logging, custom metrics, idempotency, and many leading practices easier Looks kinda cool if you prefer to work almost entirely in python and avoid using any 3rd party tools like Terraform etc to manage the support functions of deploying, monitoring, debugging lambda functions - Tracing: Decorators and utilities to trace Lambda function handlers, and both synchronous and asynchronous functions Logging - Structured logging made easier, and decorator to enrich structured logging with key Lambda context details Metrics - Custom Metrics created asynchronously via CloudWatch Embedded Metric Format (EMF) Event handler: AppSync - AWS AppSync event handler for Lambda Direct Resolver and Amplify GraphQL Transformer function Event handler: API Gateway and ALB - Amazon API Gateway REST/HTTP API and ALB event handler for Lambda functions invoked using Proxy integration Bring your own middleware - Decorator factory to create your own middleware to run logic before, and after each Lambda invocation Parameters utility - Retrieve and cache parameter values from Parameter Store, Secrets Manager, or DynamoDB Batch processing - Handle partial failures for AWS SQS batch processing Typing - Static typing classes to speedup development in your IDE Validation - JSON Schema validator for inbound events and responses Event source data classes - Data classes describing the schema of common Lambda event triggers Parser - Data parsing and deep validation using Pydantic Idempotency - Convert your Lambda functions into idempotent operations which are safe to retry Feature Flags - A simple rule engine to evaluate when one or multiple features should be enabled depending on the input Streaming - Streams datasets larger than the available memory as streaming data. Brian #4: How to create a self updating GitHub Readme Bob Belderbos Bob's GitHub profile is nice Includes latest Pybites articles, latest Python tips, and even latest Fosstodon toots And he includes a link to an article on how he did this. A Python script that pulls together all of the content, build-readme.py and fills in a TEMPLATE.md markdown file. It gets called through a GitHub action workflow, update.yml and automatically commits changes, currently daily at 8:45 This happens every day, and it looks like there are only commits if Note: We covered Simon Willison's notes on self updating README on episode 192 in 2020 Extras Brian: GitHub can check your repos for leaked secrets. Julia Evans has released a new zine, The Pocket Guide to Debugging Python Easter Eggs Includes this fun one from 2009 from Barry Warsaw and Brett Cannon >>> from __future__ import barry_as_FLUFL >>> 1 2 True >>> 1 != 2 File "[HTML_REMOVED]", line 1 1 != 2 ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Crontab Guru Michael: Canary Email AI 3.11 delivers First chance to try “iPad as the sole travel device.” Here's a report. Follow up from 306 and 309 discussions. Maps be free New laptop design Joke: What are clouds made of?

It's back and now a tradition! It's the Holiday Gift Guide episode where Brittany and Nick share their picks for gifts that might appeal to a developer in your life. Brittany's Picks Philips Hue: Smart lighting (https://www.philips-hue.com/en-us) Gold Neutral Recorder Button (https://www.amazon.com/Neutral-Recorder-Recordable-Education-Batteries/dp/B07MQXQWBB) Cirkul Water Bottle | Brittany's Referral Link to Save $ (https://drinkcirkul.com/share/Brittany-V6240301580378) Felix Gray Blue Light Glasses (https://felixgray.com/collections/blue-light-glasses) Wizard Zines by Julia Evans (https://wizardzines.com/) Nick's Picks Rebuilding Rails by Noah Gibbs (https://rebuilding-rails.com/) AWS IoT Button (https://aws.amazon.com/iotbutton/) Roam Research – A note taking tool for networked thought (https://roamresearch.com/) Steam Deck (https://store.steampowered.com/steamdeck) Lava Lamp (https://www.lavalamp.com/) Sponsored By: Honeybadger (https://www.honeybadger.io/) Honeybadger monitors your cron jobs and services to make sure they don't silently disappear. When Honeybadger is quiet, life is good. Check monitoring off your todo list. Try Honeybadger free for 15 days. JetBrains RubyMine (https://www.jetbrains.com/ruby/) RubyMine is an intelligent cross-platform IDE that provides all essential tools for Ruby and Ruby on Rails developers out of the box. It offers smart code completion and analysis, easy code navigation, safe automated refactorings, an interactive debugger, Git workflow support, database integration, and many other tools. All tools are integrated together in a highly customizable, productive, user-friendly environment. To get a special 20% discount for the listeners of The Ruby on Rails Podcast just enter the discount code railspodcast during purchase (https://www.jetbrains.com/ruby/). You can apply this discount to JetBrains All products pack and use IDEs of your choice.

Guest: Daily Maverick journalist, Julia Evans, takes John Maytham through the 2009 court case and the impact the ruling may have had in the Jagersfontein case.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Refilwe Moloto speaks to Daily Maverick's Julia Evans about the latest developments into the deaths of 21 people in an Eastern Cape tavern on Saturday night. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Rick explains what containers and serverless functions are, why they are related, why they are the latest development in the evolution of the client server architecture, why you need to secure them, and how. Resources: “5 ways to secure your containers,” by Steven Vaughan-Nichols, CEO, Vaughan-Nichols & Associates, 23 April 2019. “8 technologies that will disrupt business in 2020,” by Paul Heltzel, CIO, 26 August 2019. “A Brief History of Containers: From the 1970s Till Now,” by Rani Osnat, Aqua, 10 January 2020. “A brief history of SSH and remote access,” by Jeff Geerling, an excerpt from Chapter 11: Server Security and Ansible, in Ansible for DevOps, 15 April 2014. “Amazon Launches Lambda, An Event-Driven Compute Service,” by Ron Miller, TC, 13 November 2014 “Application Container Security Guide: NIST Special Publication 800-190,” by Murugiah Souppaya, John Morello, and Karen Scarfone, NIST, September 2017. “Container Explainer,” IDG.TV, 19 August 2015. “Container Network Security - Kubernetes Network Policies in Action with Cilium (Cloud Native),” by Fernando, Gitlab, 16 July 2020. “Container Security,” by Synk. “Google has quietly launched its answer to AWS Lambda,” by Jordan Novet, Venture Beat, 9 February 2016. “Historical Computers in Japan: Unix Servers,” IPSJ Computer Museum. “M.C. Escher Collection,” Maurits Cornelis (MC) Escher - 1898 - 1972. “Serverless Architectures,” by Martin Fowler, martin.Fowler.com, 22 May 2018. “Serverless vs Microservices — Which Architecture to Choose in 2020?” TechMagic, 01 JULY 2020. “The Benefits of Containers,” by Ben Corrie, VMWARE, 16 May 2017. “The essential guide to software containers for application development,” by David Linthicum, Chief Cloud Strategy Officer, Deloitte Consulting. “The Invention of the Virtual Machine,” by SEAN CONROY, IDKRTM, 25 JANUARY 2018. “What are containers and why do you need them?” By Paul Rubens, CIO, 27 JUN 2017. “What even is a container: namespaces and cgroups,” by Julia Evans, Julia Evans Blog. “What is a Container?” by Ben Corrie, VMWARE, 16 May 2017 “What is a Container?” by VMWARE.

Watch the live stream: Watch on YouTube About the show Sponsored by us: Check out the courses over at Talk Python And Brian's book too! Special guest: Kim van Wyk Michael #0: Take our survey: Should we try to shorten the episodes? Please fill out the 3 question Google Form here We'll be taking a break so see you in two weeks. Also feedback / rate us in your podcast player app Brian #1: Jupyter Games Thorsten Beier “Making their own tiny video games can be a great way for kids to learn programming in a playful matter.” For 2D physics-based games, Box2D, (written in C++), is a 2D rigid body simulation library One Python binding, pyb2d, is from Thorsten Game examples use Ipycanvas, Ipywidgets, and Ipyevents for a place to draw and input events. There are Box2D examples for physics simulations, like internal combustion and a wind tunnel. Game examples, with code, and not that much code billiards Angry Shapes (like Angry birds) World of Goo homage Rocket Color Mixing (it's oddly satisfying to play with, and it's like 73 lines of code, including blank lines and docstring) several more examples Demo games/examples in binder Being able to play with a game engine through Jupyter is kind of amazing. Cool teaching/learning tool. Michael #2: Canary Tokens First, what are canaries (from Thinkst)? These tokens might be useful for finding fallout of Log4Shell But also generally useful Kim #3: pywinauto and PyAutoGUI - libraries for programmatically controlling a GUI-based tool. These can be very handy for simplifying the use of complex GUIs with dozens of options you need to set every time you run them and also for automating GUI tooling as part of a pipeline. Brian #4: A reverse chronology of some Python features Brett Cannon Partly for people wishing for the “good old days” of some old version of Python Brett recommends going down the list and stopping at the first feature you can't live without. If you can't go very far, better not complain about language bloat. I had to stop at 3.10, since I really like the new error messages. Here's an abbreviated list of new features in different Python versions. (And I'm abbreviating it even more for the podcast) Python 3.10 Better error messages, Union operator for types, paraenthesized context managers, match statement (pattern matching) Brett notes that the match statement required a new parser for Python the new parser made better error messages possible so, you can't toss pattern matching without being willing to give up better error messages Python 3.9 dict support for | and |=, type hinting generics for built-in collections Python 3.8 f-string support for =, f``"``{val=}``", := walrus operator (assignment expressions) Python 3.7 dictionaries preserve insertion order, breakpoint() Python 3.6 f-strings, (need we say more) also underscores in numeric literals, async generators and comprehensions, preserving keyword argument order … goes back to 3.1 Michael #5: Hyperactive GCs and ORMs/ODMs Does Python do extremely too many GCs for ORMs? Hint: yes During the execution of that single query against SQLAlchemy, without adjusting Python's GC settings, we get an extreme number of GC collections (1,859 GCs for a single SQLAlchemy query of 20k records). Our fix at Talk Python has been to increase the number of surviving allocations required to force a GC from 700 to 50,000. What can be done to improve this? Maybe someday Python will have an adaptive GC where if it runs a collection and finds zero cycles it backs off and if it starts finding more cycles it ramps up or something like that. For now, test adjusting the thresholds Here are a few presentations / resources: Michael's presentation at Python Web Conf 2021 Talk Python Memory Deep Dive course allocations, gen1, gen2 = gc.get_threshold() # GC every 50K not 700 surviving container allocations. allocations = 50_000 gc.set_threshold(allocations, gen1, gen2) Kim #6: DockerSlim- A tool to reduce the size and improve the security of Docker images. I've used it a little and got some 1Gb Ubuntu-based images down to 50Mb and that was barely scratching the surface. Extras Michael: Emojis for comments Kim: python -m http.server - a small reminder to people that this is a quick way to get files off a Python-equipped system by standing up a simple web server. Mess with DNS - Julia Evans released this really impressive learning tool last week to let people explore DNS settings without breaking real sites. Magit - a slightly tongue-in-cheek addition to last week's discussion on git via both CLI and by mashing buttons in VS Code. Anyone using emacs should strongly consider magit for git - I've kept emacs open even while trying to use other editors because I find magit so indispensable. I've included these just as small items off the top of my head that may or may not be worth a mention. Joke: We use cookies candle (and I don't care about cookies extension) Little Bobby Jindi And more Log4Shell memes

Many of you are bloggers or have written tech tutorials. Explaining concepts and ideas is hard! Writing with clarity and economy is something that I have struggled with, and I am constantly trying to improve. I recently read an article from Julia Evans that includes a list of 13 patterns to avoid when writing. I've definitely done all of them, and now that I have a list I hope to avoid them in the future! Julia's post: https://jvns.ca/blog/confusing-explanations/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/nedinthecloud Website: https://nedinthecloud.com Pluralsight: https://app.pluralsight.com/profile/author/edward-bellavance GitHub: https://github.com/ned1313

On this special edition of The Changelog, we tell Vim's story from the mouths of its users. Julia Evans, Drew Neil, Suz Hinton, and Gary Bernhardt join Jerod Santo for a deep and wide-ranging discussion about “the best text editor that anyone ever wrote.”

On this special edition of The Changelog, we tell Vim's story from the mouths of its users. Julia Evans, Drew Neil, Suz Hinton, and Gary Bernhardt join Jerod Santo for a deep and wide-ranging discussion about “the best text editor that anyone ever wrote.”

Have you known or lost anyone in your life due to cancer? The pain and suffering that cancer causes isn't a quick recovery process - don't forget to give yourself grace and take the time needed to recover through the grief and trauma. In this episode, I am joined by the wonderful, inspiring, and resilient Julia Evans. Julia has battled and beat cancer not once, but twice, and is now the founder of the non-profit, Coloring Over Cancer. As a survivor of Lymphoma of the brain and breast cancer and losing both her mother and mother-in-law to cancer, Julia is on a mission to make strides in the global fight against cancer. Her work within Coloring Over Cancer educates, encourages, and empowers those battling cancer through information, resources, and promoting emotional support. Coloring Over Cancer uses the healing properties of art to inspire cancer fighters and survivors to empower themselves through creativity. Tune in to learn about Julia's cancer journey from diagnosis to recovery and how she is inspiring other cancer fighters and survivors through art and creativity!Some Questions I Ask: Can you talk about your past and why Coloring Over Cancer? (9:07)Why did you not crumble? (15:59)Do you think coloring helps get you out of the monkey mind? (26:13)Is there anything you can share with someone who is going through uncertainty? (32:10)In This Episode You Will Learn What to say to someone who is experiencing loss and grief (3:16)The timeline of Julia's cancer battle (11:38)The affirmations that helped Julia through her battle (18:36)About the survivor's guilt that Julia has worked through (22:44)What a coloring workshop with Julia is like (28:20)How Julia's coloring community has helped her healing journey (37:37)Connect with Julie: Coloring Over Cancer WebsiteFacebook Let's Connect! The Grief Recovery MethodInstagramFacebookJoin the Grief Recovery Now Facebook Group See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Toutes les notes sont disponibles sur https://www.clever-cloud.com/fr/podcast/47 Avec par ordre d'apparition : @geal @waxzce @Zevran @g_scheibel 00:00:00 - Introduction 00:02:00 - L'envers du décor des donations à Wikipedia https://twitter.com/marcan42/status/1399713379590098948?s=19 00:08:10 - Les données médicales du pass sanitaire envoyées à un tiers https://www.nextinpact.com/article/46153/pass-sanitaire-poudre-aux-yeux-pseudonymat-donnees-medicales-en-clair 00:14:20 - la redevance copie privée sur le reconditionné https://www.nextinpact.com/article/45894/redevance-copie-privee-sur-reconditionne-dramatique-selon-recommerce 00:19:15 - AWS pioche dans les data (AI) de ses utilisateurs pour sa R&D https://techmonitor.ai/techonology/cloud/aws-user-data 00:28:30 - Elastic on Azure aka take that AWS https://www.infoq.com/news/2021/05/azure-elastic-stack/ 00:35:40 - It's Official: El Salvador's Legislature Votes to Adopt Bitcoin as Legal Tender https://www.coindesk.com/its-official-el-salvadors-legislature-votes-to-adopt-bitcoin-as-legal-tender 00:46:30 - Docker Hub frappé par le crypto mining https://www.docker.com/blog/changes-to-docker-hub-autobuilds/ 00:48:40 - Les CPUs et Kubernetes https://andydote.co.uk/2021/06/02/os-cpus-and-kubernetes/ 00:56:37 - Terraform 1.0 https://www.hashicorp.com/resources/celebrating-terraform-1-0 01:05:37 - Fastly down, Global CDN Disruption https://twitter.com/fastly/status/1402221348659814411?s=20 https://www.fastly.com/blog/summary-of-june-8-outage https://status.fastly.com/incidents/vpk0ssybt3bj 01:08:00 - Stackoverflow est racheté par le fond d'investissement Prosus https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/06/stack-overflow-sold-to-tech-investor-prosus-for-1-8-billion/ ( https://twitter.com/holman/status/1400136432128192514 ) 01:16:30 - Julia Evans fait plein de petites bds sympa pour aborder des notions techniques https://wizardzines.com/comics/shared-libraries/ 01:22:45 - le FBI qui gère une app de chat pour criminels https://twitter.com/ericgarland/status/1402100449013125123?s=19 01:28:20 - maintenant on empile les CPU https://www.anandtech.com/show/16725/amd-demonstrates-stacked-vcache-technology-2-tbsec-for-15-gaming 01:30:16 - le papier “cores that don't count”: les probabilités de cpu défectueux (qui fonctionnent mais font des erreurs de calcul) augmente quand on a beaucoup de machines

Navigating a breast cancer journey can cause feelings of confusion and fear, all of which are normal.  There are healthy ways to cope with the stress caused by these fears, such as mindfulness meditation, support groups or finding a creative outlet. Today’s guest has beat cancer not once, but twice! As a survivor of Lymphoma of the brain as well as breast cancer, Julia Evans knows firsthand how important it is to find ways to keep the faith and is committed to encouraging, educating and empowering those in the fight through her nonprofit, Coloring Over Cancer. Special Guest: Julia Evans.

In this episode, we speak with Julia Evans. Julia runs a programming zines business, called Wizard Zines (https://wizardzines.com/), where she creates comics about various programming concepts. She has been creating zines, when she was still a software engineer at Stripe. Her zines are extremely approachable and highly educational. In addition to creating zines, Julia is a prolific blogger and has around 500 posts on her blog at jvns.ca. Her blogs are another great source to learn about fundamental programming concepts.  We had a lot of fun speaking with Julia for this episode. We discuss two bugs she came across at Stripe. We talk about how she identified and fixed a bug in Kubernetes Scheduler and how her understanding of TCP helped her fix a performance regression. We also cover other topics like blogging, zines, debugging and learning new things. Please enjoy this fun conversation with the amazing Julia Evans! Website link: https://softwaremisadventures.com/julia  Links: https://jvns.ca  https://wizardzines.com/ https://twitter.com/b0rk  https://github.com/jvns    Music Credits: Vlad Gluschenko — Forest License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

Julia Evans is a programmer and author who creates delightful zines about computers called Wizard Zines. Her latest issue focuses on containers, so we chatted about important concepts around containers, and how she decides what goes into a zine. You can purchase her zines at wizardzines.com.

Guillaume n'était pas présent dans cet épisode, mais rassurez vous Emmanuel assure la permanence des blagues et accompagné d'Antonio et d'Audrey il commente les actus du mois de novembre : ça discute de Quarkus, Spring Boot, Gradle, Reactive Programming, Docker, sécurité et bien sûr, loi, société et organisation. Enregistré le 13 novembre 2020 Téléchargement de l'épisode [LesCastCodeurs-Episode-242.mp3](https://traffic.libsyn.com/lescastcodeurs/LesCastCodeurs-Episode-242.mp3) ## News ### Langages [Guide de migration à Scala 3](https://scalacenter.github.io/scala-3-migration-guide/) [11 ans de Go](https://blog.golang.org/11years) ### Librairies [Quarkus 1.9.0](https://quarkus.io/blog/quarkus-1-9-0-final-released/) * [Deux livres gratuits sur Quarkus par Antonio](https://twitter.com/agoncal/status/1323613021390934016) [Helidon 2.1.0](https://github.com/oracle/helidon/releases/tag/2.1.0) [R2DBC et Reactive Streams rejoignent la Reactive Foundation, qui publie ses principes de design pour les applications cloud native](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/11/10/2123974/0/en/Reactive-Foundation-Publishes-New-Cloud-Native-Application-Design-Principles-and-Announces-Two-New-Projects-at-Reactive-Summit.html) [Spring Boot 2.4](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/wiki/Spring-Boot-2.4-Release-Notes) * [Reactor Europium GA (2020.0.0) avec Reactor-core 3.4.0 et Reactor-netty 1.0.0](https://github.com/reactor/reactor/releases/tag/2020.0.0) ### Infrastructure [Les bonnes pratiques de sécurité pour ses Dockerfiles](https://cloudberry.engineering/article/dockerfile-security-best-practices/) [Docker mets en pause l'application de sa nouvelle police de gestion des images](https://www.docker.com/blog/docker-hub-image-retention-policy-delayed-and-subscription-updates/) ### Cloud [Google s'associe à OVH](https://www.ovh.com/fr/news/presse/cpl1685.ovhcloud-google-cloud-annoncent-partenariat-strategique-co-construire-solution-confiance) * [Cloud : alliance inédite entre l’américain Google et le français OVH](https://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2020/11/10/cloud-alliance-inedite-entre-l-americain-google-et-le-francais-ovh_6059221_3234.html) [Abandon de l'offre on-premise de atlassian (jira et confluence) ](https://twitter.com/ldubost/status/1318114879446843392) ### Web [Netlix passe à Kotlin multiplatform pour les applications iOS et Android](https://netflixtechblog.com/netflix-android-and-ios-studio-apps-kotlin-multiplatform-d6d4d8d25d23) [JetBrains sors Jetpack Compose for Desktop en M1, basé sur Jetpack](https://blog.jetbrains.com/cross-post/jetpack-compose-for-desktop-milestone-1-released/) ### Outillage [Gradle 6.7](https://docs.gradle.org/6.7/release-notes.html) [Cédric Champeau modernise le build de Apache Groovy, avec des conventions modernes de Gradle](https://twitter.com/CedricChampeau/status/1318828474560352257) [Alternatives aux outils en ligne de commande écrits en Rust](https://zaiste.net/posts/shell-commands-rust/) ### Hardware [Il y a le bon câble USB et le mauvais câble USB](https://blog.networkprofile.org/usb-load-testing-chargers-and-cables) * USB power meter/analyzer et USB load tester pour detecter les mauvais cables * Des cables qui gardent les 5v d'autres qui descendent à 4,1v ### Méthodologies * [Comment débugger votre équipe](https://www.infoq.com/presentations/debugging-team-mastery-autonomy-purpose/) ### Sécurité [Nouvelle CVE dans Chrome ](https://thehackernews.com/2020/10/chrome-zeroday-attacks.html) [Faille de sécu sur les workflow GitHub](https://www.neowin.net/amp/google-discloses-high-severity-security-flaw-in-github/) [GitHub oublié de renouveler son certificat. Oops](https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/github-breaks-site-layout-after-forgetting-to-renew-certificate/amp/) [Let's Encrypt devient grand](https://letsencrypt.org/2020/11/11/own-two-feet.html) ### Fun [Comics sur les fonctions en bash](https://wizardzines.com/comics/bash-functions) par [Julia Evans](https://twitter.com/b0rk) ### Loi, société et organisation [Mobilizon l’alternative à Facebook proposée par Framasoft](https://framablog.org/2020/10/27/mobilizon-vos-evenements-vos-groupes-vos-donnees/) [Loi Sécurité Globale : Surveillance généralisée des manifestations](https://www.laquadrature.net/2020/10/29/loi-securite-globale-surveillance-generalisee-des-manifestations/) * [L'alerte de la défenseure des droits](https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/fr/communique-de-presse/2020/11/proposition-de-loi-securite-globale-lalerte-de-la-defenseure-des-droits) * [Tribune : “L’article 24 de la future loi ʻsécurité globale’ menace la liberté d’informer”](https://www.telerama.fr/medias/larticle-24-de-la-future-loi-securite-globale-menace-la-liberte-dinformer-6739125.php) [Identité numérique et reconnaissance faciale : le Conseil d'Etat a rendu son verdict](https://www.laquadrature.net/2020/11/06/identite-numerique-et-reconnaissance-faciale-defaite-au-conseil-detat-le-combat-continue/) ## Outils de l'épisode Crowdcast de Youri sur ses podcasts préférés * [Message A Carractere Informatique](https://www.clever-cloud.com/fr/podcast/) * [Electro Monkeys](https://electro-monkeys.fr/) * [If This Then Dev](https://ifttd.io/) * [Tech Rocks Podcasts](https://www.tech.rocks/les-podcasts) * [No Limit Secu](https://www.nolimitsecu.fr/) * [La Méthode Scinetifique](https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/la-methode-scientifique) * [C'est Plus Que De La SF](https://www.actusf.com/detail-d-une-rubrique/plus-que-de-la-sf) ## Conférences [Codeurs En Seine 2020 - Edition en ligne](https://twitter.com/codeursenseine/status/1301064575786405888?s=21) * En novembre, les mardis à 19h et les jeudis à 21h * 45 minutes de conférences + environ 15 minutes de questions * En ligne sur Twitch + rediffusion Youtube Web Stories le 5/2 en ligne Le Devfest Lille le 11/6 en présentiel ## Nous contacter Soutenez Les Cast Codeurs sur Patreon [Faire un crowdcast ou une crowdquestion](https://lescastcodeurs.com/crowdcasting/) Contactez-nous via twitter sur le groupe Google ou sur le site web

After 40 years with Connecticut Community Care, the State’s leading long-term care management nonprofit organization, Molly Rees Gavin, President, today announced plans to retire. Concurrently, the CCC Board of Directors announced that, beginning August 3, Julia Evans Starr will succeed Gavin. As Executive Director of the Connecticut Commission on Aging, Julia and her Commissioners educated the General Assembly on a myriad of policy issues; one of the most recent of which was a nationally recognized “Livable Communities” initiative. Julia also has been instrumental in the development of numerous State Plans, the work of the Coalition for Elder Justice and MyPlaceCT.org. For the past 40 years, we have improved the lives of thousands of individuals of all ages and abilities, helping them to achieve their dreams to live how and where they choose. We are Connecticut’s premier and largest care management organization and are dedicated to partnering with individuals, families and supporters so that all people may remain independent and living at home.

Julia Evans, is a zine author and software engineer at Stripe. She joins us to talk about teaching specifics as opposed to high-level overviews, using zines to show that things that sound hard aren't hard in practice, the longevity of Julia's zine empire, and the impact that monetizing her zines had on her audience and the way she approaches working on them.Julia writes zines, short tutorials in comic form for software developers. She recently starting monetizing them, it had an impact on her audience but not as much as you would think. Monetizing even had the unforeseen side effect of her zines getting taken more seriously, a college professor even made then required reading in his class.She tries to keep the zines focused, with the topics breaking down something very particular. High levels talks often have the problem of not imparting anything useful. The specificity respects people's time and also can give greater context than a high-level overview. It's also much easier to be motivated to start a twenty-page zine as opposed to a three-hundred-page book.Julia has many ideas for her zine empire. She wants to continue to collaborate with other developers so she can deliver content that isn't entirely in her wheelhouse. She also wants to start getting into some non-programming concepts, statistics in particular at some point. The possibilities with the medium are pretty much endless.Transcript"Exploring Concepts and Teaching Using Focused Zines with Julia Evans" TranscriptResources:Wizard ZinesJulia Evans:TwitterGithubWebsiteJoel HooksTwitterWebsite

Bridget chats with Julia Evans (Stripe) about learning, service discovery, CAP theorem, distributed systems, remote work, zines, and more!