Podcasts about moral behavior

 ➡️ Become A 'I Never Knew Tv' Youtube Member:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwZ2vurIl_X8rv0Dv4mu12A/joinOn the 160th episode of The Bald Head-N-The Dread Podcast, Jr (The Bald Head) and Autarchii (The Dread) reason about the lack of accountability influencers display, when it comes to influencing moral behavior.➡️ Tune into 'I NEVER KNEW RADIO'Roots, Rock, Reggae MusicHosted By : Jr of 'I Never Knew Tv'https://www.WLOY.orgSunday 9 -11 AM ESTWednesday 8- 10 AM ESTThursday 10- Noon AM EST

This podcast is a commentary and does not contain any copyrighted material of the reference source. We strongly recommend accessing/buying the reference source at the same time. ■Reference Source https://www.ted.com/talks/frans_de_waal_moral_behavior_in_animals ■Post on this topic (You can get FREE learning materials!) https://englist.me/137-academic-words-reference-from-frans-de-waal-moral-behavior-in-animals-ted-talk/ ■Youtube Video https://youtu.be/yc_j6wDsdYw (All Words) https://youtu.be/6YkzC8It-o0 (Advanced Words) https://youtu.be/O80OWTkjgDk (Quick Look) ■Top Page for Further Materials https://englist.me/ ■SNS (Please follow!)

Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 Betrayals: The Unpredictability of Human Relations by Gabriella Turnaturi, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=9079 Feelings Of Betrayal Are Irrational And Unnecessary Drama, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=49294 Jews & Betrayal, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=70490 The Sociology of Sports-Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141923 Ears Wide Shut: Epistemological Populism, Argutainment and Canadian Conservative Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141868 A Political Scientist Rides the Talk Radio Circuit, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141859 Understanding the Rise of Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139911 Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139829 David Foster Wallace: Deep into the mercenary world of take-no-prisoners political talk radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139794 Call-In Talk Radio: Compensation or Enrichment?, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139785 Extemporaneous Blending: Conceptual Integration in Humorous Discourse from Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139777 JUST BE YOURSELF? TALK RADIO PERFORMANCE AND AUTHENTIC ON-AIR SELVES, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139758, Australian Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139732 Political Junkies: From Talk Radio to Twitter, How Alternative Media Hooked Us on Politics and Broke Our Democracy, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=134131 The Drudge Revolution: The Untold Story of How Talk Radio, Fox News, and a Gift Shop Clerk with an Internet Connection Took Down the Mainstream Media, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=134074 Talk Radio's America: How an Industry Took Over a Political Party That Took Over the United States, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=128501 To Succeed In Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=85681 The talk-radio godfather of Trumpamania: What Michael Savage can tell us about America's white working class, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=92854

Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 Betrayals: The Unpredictability of Human Relations by Gabriella Turnaturi, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=9079 Feelings Of Betrayal Are Irrational And Unnecessary Drama, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=49294 Jews & Betrayal, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=70490 The Sociology of Sports-Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141923 Ears Wide Shut: Epistemological Populism, Argutainment and Canadian Conservative Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141868 A Political Scientist Rides the Talk Radio Circuit, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141859 Understanding the Rise of Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139911 Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139829 David Foster Wallace: Deep into the mercenary world of take-no-prisoners political talk radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139794 Call-In Talk Radio: Compensation or Enrichment?, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139785 Extemporaneous Blending: Conceptual Integration in Humorous Discourse from Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139777 JUST BE YOURSELF? TALK RADIO PERFORMANCE AND AUTHENTIC ON-AIR SELVES, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139758, Australian Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139732 Political Junkies: From Talk Radio to Twitter, How Alternative Media Hooked Us on Politics and Broke Our Democracy, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=134131 The Drudge Revolution: The Untold Story of How Talk Radio, Fox News, and a Gift Shop Clerk with an Internet Connection Took Down the Mainstream Media, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=134074 Talk Radio's America: How an Industry Took Over a Political Party That Took Over the United States, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=128501 To Succeed In Talk Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=85681 The talk-radio godfather of Trumpamania: What Michael Savage can tell us about America's white working class, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=92854

It's hard to predict how personality traits will affect behavior in new situations.We don't have a good grasp of the difference between a “new situation” and “a variant of an old situation.”Small differences in the situation (like recent good luck) can make a big difference in how traits like “helpfulness” are expressed. So you'll probably need to try it and see ("probe-sense-response"), rather than assume you can find out enough to predict ("sense-analyze-respond").Summary sources:John M. Doris, Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, 2005. (This is focused on questions in the philosophical idea of "virtue ethics". Unless you care about that, this is mostly a place to find primary sources.)Walter Mischel, "Toward an Integrative Science of the Person", 2004Also cited or used:Theodore Newcomb, The consistency of certain extrovert-introvert behavior patterns in 51 problem boys, 1929. (Not available online. Link is to the University of Illinois Library copy. All hail interlibrary loan!)Alice M. Isen and Paula F. Levin, "Effect of feeling good on helping: cookies and kindness", 1972. (The pay phone experiment)John M. Darley and Daniel Batson, "'From Jerusalem to Jericho': A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior", 1973 (the seminarian experiment).John M. Digman, "Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model", 1999 Walter Mischel, Personality and Assessment, 1968David J. Snowden and Mary E. Boone, "A Leader's Framework for Decision Making", Harvard Business Review, 2007. (I used this for quotes and claims about the Cynefin framework, which is pronounced "kuh-NEV-in", as it's a Welsh word.)Freeman Dyson, Infinite in All Directions, 1998Miscellaneous: “Always try to get data that's good enough that you don't need to do statistics on it.”What 0.14 correlation looks likeCreditsTwo-slot postage stamp vending machine image courtesy the Smithsonian Museum. Public domain.

00:30 Listen to audio of L.A. council members making racist, crude remarks, https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-10-10/full-audio-leaked-recording-la-councilmembers-racist-comments 02:00 Tucker on PA's senate race 12:00 Reb Dooovid joins, https://twitter.com/RebDoooovid 29:00 Why couldn't priests with defects serve in the Temple?, https://www.patheos.com/blogs/northamptonseminar/2016/05/20/why-couldnt-priests-with-defects-serve-in-the-temple/ 31:00 List of disqualifications for the Jewish priesthood, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_disqualifications_for_the_Jewish_priesthood 39:00 Kanye West accused of anti-semitism, https://www.vox.com/culture/23400851/kanye-west-fake-kids-antisemitism 41:30 Hasidic School Is Breaking State Education Law, N.Y. Official Rules, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/12/nyregion/hasidic-yeshiva-mesivta-arugath-habosem-secular-education.html 43:00 Kitten Natividad, Movie Star in Russ Meyer's Bawdy World, Dies at 74, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/05/movies/kitten-natividad-dead.html 1:07:00 Mickey Kaus says he's no longer a character voter 1:12:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 1:28:10 Aussie shock jock Kyle Sandilands https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nury_Martinez#Racist_comments https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-10-11/lopez-column-mike-bonin https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-d-c-bus-fare-is-a-polite-suggestion-evasion-budget-shortfall-enforcement-action-virginia-maryland-11665341012?mod=hp_opin_pos_6#cxrecs_s https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/10/us/politics/mastriano-shapiro-antisemitism.html https://www.wired.com/story/privacy-psychology-social-media/ https://www.newyorker.com/culture/jia-tolentino/the-personal-essay-boom-is-over https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2022/11/03/the-illusion-of-the-first-person-merve-emre/ https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-talented-ms-calloway/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Calloway Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:40 In Hasidic Enclaves, Failing Private Schools Flush With Public Money, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/11/nyregion/hasidic-yeshivas-schools-new-york.html 02:00 Dooovid joins, https://twitter.com/RebDoooovid 04:00 The anti-semitic accusation 35:00 Agudath Yisrael, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agudat_Yisrael 1:01:00 Tucker Carlson on the 21st anniversary of 9-11 1:26:40 Moral Injury - Dr. John Doris, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxLNKpLcU1k 1:28:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 1:40:00 When there are people blocking your right of way on a public thoroughfare, do you say a loud "Excuse me!"? https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/09/09/hasidic-yeshiva-new-york-orthodox/ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/arts/music/archie-roach-dead.html https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/08/opinion/environment/antarctica-ice-sheet-climate-change.html https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/07/magazine/arizona-state-university-multicultural-center.html https://www.jta.org/2022/09/06/global/are-too-many-germans-converting-to-judaism-the-debate-is-roiling-germanys-jewish-community https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncontacted_peoples https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/eric-weinberg-alleged-victims-speak-out-sexual-assault-1235209912/ https://variety.com/2022/tv/news/armie-hammer-text-messages-house-of-hammer-women-sexual-allegations-cannibal-1235358967/ Conservative Claims of Cultural Oppression: The Nature and Origins of Conservaphobia, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=144821 Conservative Claims of Cultural Oppression: The Nature and Origins of Conservaphobia: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=144168 REVIEW: The Star Chamber of Stanford: On the Secret Trial and Invisible Persecution of a Stanford Law Fellow, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=143937 Stanford Star Chamber, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=143824 Reaction to Stanford Star Chamber, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=143994 https://ronyguldmann.com/ My Best Work: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=143746 Mind, Modernity, Madness: The Impact of Culture on Human Experience, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=143670 Professor of Apocalypse: The Many Lives of Jacob Taubes, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=143590 http://vouchnationalism.com https://postkahanism.substack.com/p/the-failure-and-importance-of-kahanism?s=r Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

The Left derides conservatives who want to ascribe essential qualities to Jews, Christians, Muslims, blacks, whites, Anglos, Germans, Japanese, Nigerians. And the Left is right. Just because somebody is a member of one of these groups does not determine their essential qualities. There is no true Jew, Christian, Muslim, etc. Situations and incentives affect how people behave. So too, just because someone says something ugly on a podcast does not make them a hater or a bigot. The Left wants to ascribe essential qualities to people who say things impolitic. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 Philosopher John M. Doris writes in this respected 2005 book: * I regard this renaissance of virtue with concern. Like many others, I find the lore of virtue deeply compelling, yet I cannot help noticing that much of this lore rests on psychological theory that is some 2,500 years old. A theory is not bad simply because it is old, but in this case developments of more recent vintage suggest that the old ideas are in trouble. In particular, modern experimental psychology has discovered that circumstance has surprisingly more to do with how people behave than traditional images of character and virtue allow. * It's commonly presumed that good character inoculates against shifting fortune, and English has a rich vocabulary for expressing this belief: steady, dependable, steadfast, unwavering, unflinching. Conversely, the language generously supplies terms of abuse marking lack of character: weak, fickle, disloyal, faithless, irresolute. Such locutions imply that character will have regular behavioral manifestations: the person of good character will do well, even under substantial pressure to moral failure, while the person of bad character is someone on whom it would be foolish to rely. In this view it's character, more than circumstance, that decides the moral texture of a life; as the old saw has it, character is destiny. * Behavior is – contra the old saw about character and destiny – extraordinarily sensitive to variation in circumstance. Numerous studies have demonstrated that minor situational variations have powerful effects on helping behavior: hurried passersby step over a stricken person in their path, while unhurried passersby stop to help…The experimental record suggests that situational factors are often better predictors of behavior than personal factors, and this impression is reinforced by careful examination of behavior outside the confines of the laboratory. In very many situations it looks as though personality is less than robustly determinative of behavior. To put things crudely, people typically lack character. * When compared with advances in the natural sciences, psychology has exhibited little uncontroversial progress. * Moreover, it's not even clear that the experimentalist is well situated to tell us much about behavior; critics insist that laboratory manipulations involving small numbers of subjects on isolated occasions cannot be expected to tell us what people are likely to do outside the lab's pretend universe. Although a balanced look at the experimental literature – or at least the best of it -makes this rhetoric look hyperbolic, charges of experimental artificiality ring of truth. But how much truth can be decided only by considering the details of the experiments in question, so a final verdict awaits more concrete discussion. For now, I'll readily admit it: Experimental psychology is perhaps the worst available method for understanding human life. Except, I hasten to add, for all the other methods. * As one psychologist laments, it's “hard to avoid the conclusion that psychology is a kind of shambling, poor relation of the natural sciences” (Lykken 1991: 14). If this is the self-image of psychologists, why should philosophers look to them for help?

https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/allinthemind/can-you-change-your-personality/13888958 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior by John M. Doris: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 Scholars with a background in evolution see evolutionary psychology as the key to understanding how the world works just as theologians regard their discipline as the king of studies. Sociologists see social mores as the magic key. Psychologists talk about the Big 5 personality traits, but sociologists may argue that these traits are shaped, in part, by our interactions with others. For example, when I am successful in life, I am more outgoing, more energetic, more generous, more agreeable, more open, and less neurotic. When I am failing in life, I go in the opposite directions. * Behavior is – contra the old saw about character and destiny – extraordinarily sensitive to variation in circumstance. Numerous studies have demonstrated that minor situational variations have powerful effects on helping behavior: hurried passersby step over a stricken person in their path, while unhurried passersby stop to help…The experimental record suggests that situational factors are often better predictors of behavior than personal factors, and this impression is reinforced by careful examination of behavior outside the confines of the laboratory. In very many situations it looks as though personality is less than robustly determinative of behavior. To put things crudely, people typically lack character. * When compared with advances in the natural sciences, psychology has exhibited little uncontroversial progress. * Character and personality traits are invoked to explain what people do and how they live: Peter didn't mingle at the party because he's shy, and Sandra succeeds in her work because she's diligent. Traits also figure in prediction: Peggy will join in because she's impulsive, and Brian will forget our meeting because he's absentminded. So too for those rarefied traits called virtues: James stood his ground because he's brave, and Katherine will not overindulge because she's temperate. Such talk would not much surprise Aristotle (1984: no6ai4-23); for him, a virtue is a state of character that makes its possessors behave in ethically appropriate ways.1 I'll now begin arguing that predictive and explanatory appeals to traits, however familiar, are very often empirically inadequate: They are confounded by the extraordinary situational sensitivity observed in human behavior. * Recognizing the domain-specificity of practical endeavor helps explain how the upstanding public servant can be a faithless husband; the marital and the political are different practical domains and may engage very different cognitive, motivational, and evaluative structures. We can also understand how there be considerable may integration within a practical domain; a scholar must be both diligent and honest in her research if she is to do commendable work, although this does not entail that she exhibit the same qualities in her teaching. * Globalist conceptions of personality are predicated on the existence of substantial behavioral consistency, but the requisite consistency has not been empirically demonstrated. Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join Coinbase wallet: 32oK5JiKvCEw3bpdsQDUc1Qys6ao3Jeie4, Crypto.com https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://rumble.com/lukeford, https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593

In the final episode of this short series, Jeremy discusses divine forgiveness. This wide-ranging episode explores the imagery of divine forgiveness, divine forgiveness and God's anger, and how we forgive in response to the nature of God. Scripture References: Exodus 34 Additional Sources: Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, Volume One (Kurtines and Gewirtz) Divine Anger and Walter Brueggeman's Biblical Theology (Peck) Essay on Forgiveness (Lewis) The Doors fo the Sea (Hart)

This conversation is part of the series 'Moral Matters Matter' ('Dare to know!' Philosophy Podcast). Today we are joined by Frans de Waal. Frans de Waal is a Dutch/American biologist and primatologist known for his work on the behavior and social intelligence of primates. He is Professor in the Psychology Department of Emory University and Director of the Living Links Center at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center, in Atlanta, Georgia. Since 2013, he is a Distinguished Professor (Universiteitshoogleraar) at Utrecht University. His first book, Chimpanzee Politics (1982) compared the schmoozing and scheming of chimpanzees involved in power struggles with that of human politicians. Ever since, de Waal has drawn parallels between primate and human behavior, from peacemaking and morality to culture. His popular books — translated into twenty languages — have made him one of the world's most visible primatologists. His latest books are The Age of Empathy (2009), and The Bonobo and the Atheist (2013), Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? (2016), & Mama's Last Hug (2018), . Two recent edited volumes are The Primate Mind (2012) and Evolved Morality (2014).

Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 I think the general unit of observation for psychology is the individual and for the sociologist it is society. For Protestantism, the focus is on individual salvation, and for the Jew, the focus is on the Jewish people. Scholars with a background in evolution see evolutionary psychology as the key to understanding how the world works just as theologians regard their discipline as the king of studies. Sociologists see social mores as the magic key. Psychologists talk about the Big 5 personality traits, but sociologists may argue that these traits are shaped, in part, by our interactions with others. For example, when I am successful in life, I am more outgoing, more energetic, more generous, more agreeable, more open, and less neurotic. When I am failing in life, I go in the opposite directions. From my reading over the past few weeks, I've realized that we don't have a true self because who we are depends on our context. We are different in different places. We are different when we are with different people. If there is no true self, then there is no moral character. Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

Living In Accordance With The Qur'an

https://www.npr.org/2021/11/08/1051475843/dopesick-hulu-true-story-opioid-addiction Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 Lovemaps: Sexual/Erotic Health and Pathology, Paraphilia, and Gender Transposition In Childhood, Adolescence and Maturity by John Money, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=130433 https://www.takimag.com/article/from-dreamland-to-nightmareland/ Steve Sailer writes: With the CDC estimating last month that drug overdose deaths rose over 30 percent in the first twelve months of the pandemic to nearly 100,000, Sam Quinones' outstanding new sequel to his award-winning 2015 book Dreamland: The True Tale of America's Opiate Epidemic is definitely timely. Quinones' The Least of Us: True Tales of America and Hope in the Time of Fentanyl and Meth brings us up to date on the disastrous drug developments of the past half-dozen years. Dreamland explained how the Sackler family promoting OxyContin to doctors as a “non-addictive” synthetic opioid painkiller in the late 1990s set off what I call the White Death that quietly killed so many working-class whites in the first decade of this century. Then, as the medical profession became less irresponsible about writing pain-pill prescriptions, Mexican drug smugglers stepped in to supply cut-off pill addicts with heroin. While Dreamland was superbly reported, its prose style was occasionally slightly off. In contrast, The Least of Us is elegantly written. And Quinones has perfected his method of merging big-picture cause-and-effect analyses of the economics and neuroscience of drugs with illustrative human-interest stories of Americans swept up in this national catastrophe. Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/hollywood-media-mogul-degrading-boss-223009050.html https://www.lukeford.net/profiles/profiles/sharon_waxman.htm https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/an-energy-crisis-is-gripping-the-world-with-potentially-grave-consequences/ar-AAPjcIE The New Jonathan Franzen Novel – Crossroads, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=142122 To Start a War: How the Bush Administration Took America into Iraq https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=142105, https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/britain-s-distasteful-soccer-sellout/ar-AAPkAOc Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 The Power Of The Situation To Shape Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140115 My Covid coverage: https://lukeford.net/blog/?cat=42861 Fairness and Freedom: A History of Two Open Societies: New Zealand and the United States, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140864 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

https://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/ryan-adams/ https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/cuomo-michael-tracey Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior by John M. Doris, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670: * I regard this renaissance of virtue with concern. Like many others, I find the lore of virtue deeply compelling, yet I cannot help noticing that much of this lore rests on psychological theory that is some 2,500 years old. A theory is not bad simply because it is old, but in this case developments of more recent vintage suggest that the old ideas are in trouble. In particular, modern experimental psychology has discovered that circumstance has surprisingly more to do with how people behave than traditional images of character and virtue allow. * It's commonly presumed that good character inoculates against shifting fortune, and English has a rich vocabulary for expressing this belief: steady, dependable, steadfast, unwavering, unflinching. Conversely, the language generously supplies terms of abuse marking lack of character: weak, fickle, disloyal, faithless, irresolute. Such locutions imply that character will have regular behavioral manifestations: the person of good character will do well, even under substantial pressure to moral failure, while the person of bad character is someone on whom it would be foolish to rely. In this view it's character, more than circumstance, that decides the moral texture of a life; as the old saw has it, character is destiny. * Behavior is – contra the old saw about character and destiny – extraordinarily sensitive to variation in circumstance. Numerous studies have demonstrated that minor situational variations have powerful effects on helping behavior: hurried passersby step over a stricken person in their path, while unhurried passersby stop to help…The experimental record suggests that situational factors are often better predictors of behavior than personal factors, and this impression is reinforced by careful examination of behavior outside the confines of the laboratory. In very many situations it looks as though personality is less than robustly determinative of behavior. To put things crudely, people typically lack character. Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 Thick & thin identity, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141401 13:A**-Right Autopsy | Musonius Rufus & Todd Lewis, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DArSF9XMKkM 32:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 1:07:00 What was Offensive about the Gospel Paul Preached?, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymbX2ou0JhQ 1:13:20 THE ACADEMIC AGENT RETURNS TO THE JOLLY HERETIC, https://www.bitchute.com/video/PuknWHFBJcr2/ 1:16:00 James Thompson on Charles Murray's new book, https://www.unz.com/jthompson/cry-the-beloved-country/ 1:20:00 Why People Can't Face the Truth, https://www.unz.com/jtaylor/why-people-cant-face-the-truth/ 1:27:00 Populism is a losing strategy says AA 1:33:45 Comic rabbi Jackie Mason dies at 93, https://www.jta.org/2021/07/25/culture/jackie-mason-was-a-jewish-american-comedy-icon-these-videos-show-why 1:41:30 Latinos disavow Matt Heimbach, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2eyInMIXEQ 1:53:30 Keith Woods in public and private 2:00:00 The Twisted Group Focused on Making Nazis Comfy in Prison, https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-twisted-group-focused-on-making-nazis-comfy-in-prison 2:06:45 Vaush Reacts To Nick Fuentes & His Fans Getting KICKED OUT of CPAC, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko304iDR920 2:17:00 HOW BEN SHAPIRO TOLD ON ROSIE O'DONNELL, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e49To1btA8 2:43:20 Why Did Charles Murray Vote For Joe Biden?, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sni86jkLFkA 2:51:00 Some Weaknesses of the Cathedral, https://jottopohl.substack.com/p/some-weaknesses-of-the-cathedral 2:53:40 Michael Lewis' 'The Premonition' Is A Sweeping Indictment Of The CDC, https://www.npr.org/2021/05/03/991570372/michael-lewis-the-premonition-is-a-sweeping-indictment-of-the-cdc 2:58:30 What would you do if you were a Focusing-oriented therapist?, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9_IlauvDss 3:05:50 Slavoj Žižek on new Atheism, Sam Harris & Richard Dawkins Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 Integrated: Living Beyond the Sex Trade by Deanna Lynn, https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0995YDK3B/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1626170152&sr=8-3 03:00 Purchased: Leaving the Sex Trade By Deanna Lynn (12-8-20), https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135668 04:00 Purchased: Leaving the Sex Trade By Deanna Lynn (9-2-20), https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=134246 06:00 The experience of being interviewed 24:00 Work ethic 26:00 Going from the smartest person in the room to... 29:00 The Book of Revelation, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Revelation 34:00 God's plan 35:00 Deanna's favorite Bible book is Leviticus, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Leviticus 36:00 Biblical Inerrancy, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_inerrancy 38:00 Proof texting, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prooftext 41:30 Dealing with others' jealousy 43:20 An appropriate use of social media 45:50 Porn addiction in religious community 51:00 Attachment theory, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attachment_theory 53:00 From being a star to being a worker among workers 1:01:00 How trauma informs our theology 1:04:30 Making friends in recovery 1:07:00 Sponsorship 1:11:00 Self-loathing 1:13:45 Why An "American Nation" Cannot Be Salvaged, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kv8gmEY27G4 1:24:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 Philosopher John M. Doris writes: * I regard this renaissance of virtue with concern. Like many others, I find the lore of virtue deeply compelling, yet I cannot help noticing that much of this lore rests on psychological theory that is some 2,500 years old. A theory is not bad simply because it is old, but in this case developments of more recent vintage suggest that the old ideas are in trouble. In particular, modern experimental psychology has discovered that circumstance has surprisingly more to do with how people behave than traditional images of character and virtue allow. * It's commonly presumed that good character inoculates against shifting fortune, and English has a rich vocabulary for expressing this belief: steady, dependable, steadfast, unwavering, unflinching. Conversely, the language generously supplies terms of abuse marking lack of character: weak, fickle, disloyal, faithless, irresolute. Such locutions imply that character will have regular behavioral manifestations: the person of good character will do well, even under substantial pressure to moral failure, while the person of bad character is someone on whom it would be foolish to rely. In this view it's character, more than circumstance, that decides the moral texture of a life; as the old saw has it, character is destiny. * Behavior is – contra the old saw about character and destiny – extraordinarily sensitive to variation in circumstance. Numerous studies have demonstrated that minor situational variations have powerful effects on helping behavior: hurried passersby step over a stricken person in their path, while unhurried passersby stop to help…The experimental record suggests that situational factors are often better predictors of behavior than personal factors, and this impression is reinforced by careful examination of behavior outside the confines of the laboratory. In very many situations it looks as though personality is less than robustly determinative of behavior. To put things crudely, people typically lack character. * When compared with advances in the natural sciences, psychology has exhibited little uncontroversial progress. Am I a laughing stock? The answer might shock you. (7-17-21) https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141266 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

Audio problems in first three minutes. 00:00 Am I a laughing stock? The answer might shock you. https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141266 08:10 Andy Nowicki's reflections on a disastrous interview, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YewAR9XrtYE 20:00 Are you a sex and love addict? https://slaafws.org/download/core-files/The_40_Questions_of_SLAA.pdf 25:00 The problem, https://adultchildren.org/literature/problem/ 27:30 Self-Justification in Everyday Life, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYcgiX70WsI 53:00 Anita Busch, https://www.lukeford.net/profiles/profiles/anita_busch.htm 1:02:00 Constitutional Dictatorship: Its Dangers and Its Design, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=130386 1:08:00 Andy Nowicki's new novel, The Insurrectionist, https://www.amazon.com/Insurrectionist-Andy-Nowicki-ebook/dp/B09881NYM9/ 1:15:00 Noam Smith: Yes, lockdowns were good, https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/yes-lockdowns-were-good 1:17:00 Fear of infection hurt economy more than lockdowns, https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-06-18/fear-of-coronavirus-infection-hurt-economy-more-than-lockdowns 1:20:00 COVID lockdowns saved lives without harming economies, https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-05-19/covid-lockdowns-worked 1:40:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 1:42:00 Fruit of the Holy Spirit, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_Holy_Spirit 1:43:00 Works of the Flesh, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galatians_5#Verses_19%E2%80%9321:_Works_of_the_Flesh 1:49:00 Voter fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?cat=42874 2:55:00 Did I follow my own code of conduct? https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 3:05:00 Deep resentment against Big Tech, https://youtu.be/CFK0pPRK-ks?t=3363 3:18:00 The Shield TV Show, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shield Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 Andy Nowicki's new novel, https://www.amazon.com/Insurrectionist-Andy-Nowicki-ebook/dp/B09881NYM9 02:00 Andy Nowicki is AltRightNovelist.com, https://altrightnovelist.com/ 05:00 COVID-19 and PCR Testing, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/21462-covid-19-and-pcr-testing 17:00 Reductions in 2020 US life expectancy due to COVID-19 and the disproportionate impact on the Black and Latino populations, https://www.pnas.org/content/118/5/e2014746118 55:00 Nowicki's battle with despair 1:15:00 Growing towards attention like plants towards the sun 1:18:00 Toxic factories sustain towns and kill people 1:33:00 Voter fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?cat=42874 1:44:00 Unite the Right vs Antifa 1:50:00 Andy and Luke are drawn to spectacle, to dissidents 2:00:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 Richard Spencer, Edward Dutton analyze Charles Murray's new book Facing Reality, https://odysee.com/@radix:c/Charles-Murray-reality:c?r=VRWHKHixwYQ9eBH5b716YYMG67h2bGsy 24:00 90s black guys vs 80s black guys 28:00 Not Born Yesterday: The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=130046 1:05:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 1:18:00 Affordable Family Formation, https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2008/11/06/affordable_fami/ 1:30:00 Charles Murray favored the 2003 Iraq invasion, https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2003/02/who-s-for-war-who-s-against-it-and-why.html 1:42:30 Intro to Giorgio Agamben's "State of Exception", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkYGRYYfd-0 1:45:00 The Naked State: What the Breakdown of Normality Reveals, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140282 2:46:00 Why Did Charles Murray Vote For Joe Biden?, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sni86jkLFkA 2:49:20 Charles Murray on how Donald Trump destroyed the conservative movement, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rC_J4LTxVs Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

https://amgreatness.com/2019/12/15/a-science-based-case-for-ending-the-porn-epidemic/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnal_Knowledge_(film) The Power Of The Situation To Shape Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140115 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 The Myth Of Voter Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137198 Debunking the most common claims of voter fraud: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140096 "How claims of voter fraud were supercharged by bad science" https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140090 Kris Kobach's False Claims About Voter Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140070 ‘Trump's Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.'' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140088 'Trump And Allies Keep Claiming Republican Poll Watchers Were Banned—That's A Lie' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140062 NYT: There's no evidence to support claims that election observers were blocked from counting rooms, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140057 'EXPLAINER: Why poll watcher complaints don't amount to fraud' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140055 ‘No, Georgia election workers didn't kick out observers and illegally count ‘suitcases' of ballots', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140053 ‘Mail-in Voter Fraud: Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139307 No Evidence For Voter Fraud: A Guide To Statistical Claims About The 2020 Election, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137683 OutsideTheBeltway.com: A Return to the (Lack of) Evidence of Significant Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137612 Michael Anton Says He Does Not Know Who Truly Won The 2020 Election, But He's ‘Moved On', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137453 Who is Hans von Spakovsky? https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135307 Henry Olsen: How we can be confident that Trump's voter fraud claims are baloney, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135305 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 Ethan Ralph hosted Joseph Cotto and me to discuss Election 2020 02:00 Henry Olsen: How we can be confident that Trump's voter fraud claims are baloney, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135305 04:00 Joseph Cotto, https://twitter.com/JosephFordCotto 06:00 Cotto/Gottfried on Rumble, https://rumble.com/c/CottoGottfried 1:35:00 When was I last out of the LA bubble? 2:05:00 Southern Dingo calls in and reads two of Luke's spicy quotes 2:52:40 Luke debates Joseph Cotto: Did Voter Fraud Determine The 2020 Election? (5-13-21), https://rumble.com/vh5c27-did-voter-fraud-determine-the-2020-election-5-13-21.html 2:54:30 Tucker Carlson 3:30:00 Who is Hans von Spakovsky? https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135307 3:34:00 Kris Kobach's bogus claims on voter fraud The Power Of The Situation To Shape Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140115 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 The Myth Of Voter Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137198 Debunking the most common claims of voter fraud: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140096 "How claims of voter fraud were supercharged by bad science" https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140090 Kris Kobach's False Claims About Voter Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140070 ‘Trump's Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.'' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140088 'Trump And Allies Keep Claiming Republican Poll Watchers Were Banned—That's A Lie' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140062 NYT: There's no evidence to support claims that election observers were blocked from counting rooms, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140057 'EXPLAINER: Why poll watcher complaints don't amount to fraud' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140055 ‘No, Georgia election workers didn't kick out observers and illegally count ‘suitcases' of ballots', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140053 ‘Mail-in Voter Fraud: Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139307 No Evidence For Voter Fraud: A Guide To Statistical Claims About The 2020 Election, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137683 OutsideTheBeltway.com: A Return to the (Lack of) Evidence of Significant Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137612 Michael Anton Says He Does Not Know Who Truly Won The 2020 Election, But He's ‘Moved On', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137453 Henry Olsen: How we can be confident that Trump's voter fraud claims are baloney, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135305 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

The Power Of The Situation To Shape Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140115 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 The Myth Of Voter Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137198 Debunking the most common claims of voter fraud: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140096 "How claims of voter fraud were supercharged by bad science" https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140090 Kris Kobach's False Claims About Voter Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140070 ‘Trump's Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.'' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140088 'Trump And Allies Keep Claiming Republican Poll Watchers Were Banned—That's A Lie' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140062 NYT: There's no evidence to support claims that election observers were blocked from counting rooms, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140057 'EXPLAINER: Why poll watcher complaints don't amount to fraud' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140055 ‘No, Georgia election workers didn't kick out observers and illegally count ‘suitcases' of ballots', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140053 ‘Mail-in Voter Fraud: Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139307 No Evidence For Voter Fraud: A Guide To Statistical Claims About The 2020 Election, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137683 OutsideTheBeltway.com: A Return to the (Lack of) Evidence of Significant Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137612 Michael Anton Says He Does Not Know Who Truly Won The 2020 Election, But He's ‘Moved On', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137453 Who is Hans von Spakovsky? https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135307 Henry Olsen: How we can be confident that Trump's voter fraud claims are baloney, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135305 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

The Power Of The Situation To Shape Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140115 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 The Myth Of Voter Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137198 Debunking the most common claims of voter fraud: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140096 "How claims of voter fraud were supercharged by bad science" https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140090 Kris Kobach's False Claims About Voter Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140070 ‘Trump's Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as ‘Evidence.'' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140088 'Trump And Allies Keep Claiming Republican Poll Watchers Were Banned—That's A Lie' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140062 NYT: There's no evidence to support claims that election observers were blocked from counting rooms, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140057 'EXPLAINER: Why poll watcher complaints don't amount to fraud' https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140055 ‘No, Georgia election workers didn't kick out observers and illegally count ‘suitcases' of ballots', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140053 ‘Mail-in Voter Fraud: Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139307 No Evidence For Voter Fraud: A Guide To Statistical Claims About The 2020 Election, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137683 OutsideTheBeltway.com: A Return to the (Lack of) Evidence of Significant Fraud, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137612 Michael Anton Says He Does Not Know Who Truly Won The 2020 Election, But He's ‘Moved On', https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137453 Who Is Hans Von Popofsky? https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135307 Henry Olsen: How we can be confident that Trump's voter fraud claims are baloney, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=135305 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 09:00 Open up the lower back and the mind will follow 21:00 An Interview with moral philosophers John Doris & Laura Niemi, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Wr7vLCOIsI 24:30 Yale Courses: Virtues & Habit, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8yNxXAm7F4 32:00 Reputation Management, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CJFsG9fxWo 33:00 Professor of Communications, Josh Bentley, https://schieffercollege.tcu.edu/faculty_staff/josh-bentley/ 35:00 Representations of reliability: The rhetoric of political flip-flopping, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140012 48:00 TJump Vs Jennifer | Pantheism Vs Atheism, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTQbieGy_a8 1:19:40 Dave Rubin's Highest-Level Ideas Compilation 1:22:00 WHY CARDANO WILL 10X: The "Ethereum Killer" Cryptocurrency., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltwpx0gM_MQ 1:24:00 WHAT IF BITCOINS CRASH... THE UPCOMING CRYPTO CRASH, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA0HzpM79ZI 1:26:40 Stop Being So Nice... (as an ex-Google millionaire) 1:29:40 MILLIONAIRE DESK SETUP TOUR for Working From Home (2021) 1:31:00 My Problem With YouTubers..., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxCZhJKwqz8 1:35:00 Why I have no friends (as a millionaire), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRzFjuranQU 1:37:40 No One Wants To Work Anymore... (crypto millionaires, stock daytraders, stimulus checks, onlyfans), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=415v3DZ1w2s 1:40:20 How to stop self-sabotaging yourself. (My struggle with self-sabotagers), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t2X-kMhPIA 1:43:00 Everybody hates Doomcock, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cfzy3vlypRA 2:08:45 How the Irish Became White by Noel Ignatiev, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDzWYbrMT5w 2:20:00 How Big Tech enables the mob 2:24:00 Scott Adams rates Nick Fuentes's persuasion skills as high 2:29:00 Dr. Einat Wilf: Anti-Zionism is Anti-Semitism, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMw_pxJg-hY 2:33:00 Rabbi: "America's The Place Where ALL THE ANTI-SEMITES Now Live!", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDcrfvYKjIc 2:48:20 Nick Fuentes, Alex Jones 2:49:00 MATT WALSH: YOU DON'T HAVE A PATRIOTIC DUTY TO SUPPORT ANY COUNTRY EXCEPT YOUR OWN. BEN SHAPIRO: NO 2:50:40 David Pakman: Trump Announces Return to Presidency in Deranged Video 2:56:25 Vaush: Tim Calls Out ANDY NGO, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQ79CCfAngQ 3:04:20 Sam Hyde: It's Important To Learn How To Scam, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dgg1fpiwVcc 3:09:20 Tucker Carlson on Kamala Harris Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 NYT Op/Ed: Cancel Culture Works. We Wouldn't Have Marriage Equality Without It. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/05/opinion/gay-marriage-boycotts.html 36:00 Globalization : What's Next? | Peter Zeihan Webinar June 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV3jPKHcHSE 42:00 The Science Suggests a Wuhan Lab Leak, https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-science-suggests-a-wuhan-lab-leak-11622995184?mod=opinion_lead_pos6 1:01:00 Christopher Caldwell On The Unintended Consequences Of The Civil Rights Act, https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/christopher-caldwell-on-the-unintended 1:04:30 Not the Best: What Rush Limbaugh's Apology to Sandra Fluke Reveals about Image Restoration Strategies on Commercial Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139974 1:54:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 1:55:00 John M. Doris on moral character, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxLNKpLcU1k 2:17:30 Exploring LA's RICHEST Neighborhoods, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zS-lUu0SkM 2:33:00 Exposing the Left's agenda of fear 2:45:00 American nativism 2:46:30 Folding UK into NAFTA 2:50:00 Big Tech vs free speech 2:54:00 Challenger disaster did not involve misconduct, but institutional drift 3:02:00 Tucker Carlson on Joe Biden opening the southern border Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 Richard joins, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCE0dJw8SfA_PUNmyu_1ywdA 02:00 Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other, https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01MURE5ZE/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1 30:00 Interaction Ritual Chains, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139572 45:00 Why are young men so scared of sex? https://spectator.us/topic/young-men-scared-sex-sexting/ 59:00 The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nurture_Assumption 1:04:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 1:42:00 Sherry Turkle - Alone Together, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtLVCpZIiNs 1:59:00 From Soviet Communism to Russian Gangster Capitalism, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5nbT4xQqwI 2:01:00 Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139955 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 Former KFI talk radio producer and attorney Justin Levine joins to discuss David Foster Wallace's 2004 essay on talk radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139794 13:00 Justin was fired three times from KFI, twice by PD Robin Bertolucci 17:00 Talk radio's similarities to Top 40 radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139199 27:00 Justin Levine's talk radio diet 28:00 John and Ken Show, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_John_and_Ken_Show 33:00 KABC's Dick Cavett-style talk 35:00 Talk: A Novel by Michael Smerconish, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139199 37:00 John Ziegler, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ziegler_(talk_show_host) 39:00 David Foster Wallace, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Foster_Wallace 54:00 Big Tech was libertarian just five years ago 57:00 Blacks & Latinos have their own radio stations 1:00:00 Callers don't matter much for talk radio 1:05:30 Marc Germain aka Mr KFI 1:09:20 Howard Stern's boring 1:27:40 How to make your show better! David G. Hall, Media Strategist 1:42:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 1:49:00 John M. Doris: "Making Good: Can We Realize Our Moral Aspirations?", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GORGNufWFTI 1:55:00 The Left's New Religion - censorship 2:21:00 We compete for attention 2:25:00 Andy Ngo returns to Portland, beaten by Antifa 2:33:40 Barricade Gage on Arizona's vote audit 2:40:00 The limits of virtue, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxLNKpLcU1k 2:41:00 Anti-Vax Televangelist Rick Wiles Who Calls Covid God's Punishment Hospitalized w/ Covid 2:44:00 Michael Flynn Casually Calls For Military Coup 2:48:00 Trump Telling People He'll Be Reinstated As President by August 2:50:00 Tucker Carlson on covid origins 2:51:30 Vanity Fair investigation of covid origins, https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/the-lab-leak-theory-inside-the-fight-to-uncover-covid-19s-origins 3:02:45 Biden Creeps On Young Girl In Audience 3:06:00 Sam Hyde Sees The Amazon WageCage™ For The First Time 3:07:00 Only Fans For Israel Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erving_Goffman Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 Interaction Ritual Chains, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139572 Dr. Helen Wolfendon writes in 2012: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139758 According to Valentine, you effectively “perform as yourself” which is not the same as “being yourself”. “Performing yourself” further complicates the notions of authenticity and naturalness inherent in the “be yourself” injunction. Valentine points out that it takes time to learn how to do it; to become familiar with this strange social context and to work out an appropriate self for it. He says “With all of these sort of things, what… increases is your base level. The more you do it the higher your base level gets.” He also recognises that the presentational self must at some level, be other-directed, because it is only through reciprocity that the presenters needs are met. JV: "I've got the biggest ego in the world, you know, but I also know that that ego's not going to get served unless I'm there for the audience and unless I understand what the audience is wanting. And unless…it's all about them. If I make it all about them I get my jollies." * Talk radio presenters in the ABC are often on-air for shifts of two hours, some as long as six. Over this daily duration, five days a week, forty weeks a year, it is difficult to sustain a self that is highly alien to the selves used in other social contexts. * from a presenter perspective, it is critical that the presentation does not sound like performance – and in some cases cannot feel like a performance either. So what is it? It is clear that for these presenters, there is an active projection of the self for the audience: a “best” self, a self at the top of their form. As in all such presentations of the self, the projection is a function of the relationship, and what the presenter would like the relationship to be, and what it will be allowed to be by their audience. The relationship is not of a friend or confidante or family member or new person-you-met-at-a-party, though no doubt presenters cannibalise any or all of these for the purpose at hand. The relationship is of broadcaster to audience. The audience is known through the presenters' own history in the community of listeners, through conversations with talkback callers, outside broadcasts, and the sheer imaginative cast of emotionally intelligent minds. This audience is understood and related to in the same instant as individual and community, and in the constantly shifting play of gender, class, culture, geography, in-group and out-group nuances within a conversation which is sometimes actually two-way, but is more often a complex and reflexive interactive process in which the audience can only be imagined. Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

00:00 My 55th birthday 03:00 Disunited Nations 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuwVaUntpNQ 06:00 The Inflating of Fears, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwzU9MxmGy4 09:00 Life After Trump - China, https://us11.campaign-archive.com/?u=de2bc41f8324e6955ef65e0c9&id=bba991dfd7 27:00 Emotional Energy Levels, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdga_AHBGv4 33:00 Who won the great debate? Nick Fuentes or Robert Barnes? 37:00 Whiteshift by Eric Kaufmann: A Video Review, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R6MQVW35DU 41:00 Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome- causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, pathology 44:30 Hypermobile Ehlers Danlos Syndrome: My Story, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQr8Gu4WImg 49:00 “Sleep Disorders in Ehlers-Danlos and Related Syndromes: A Panoply of Paradoxes” - Alan Pocinki, MD, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr6Iv8_NVOw 54:20 Barricade Garage: "PLEASE SATISFY MY WHITENESS", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_IYNt79XIM 57:20 Opie & Anthony Was A Place For Men, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r3P47R6sAg 59:20 Robert Barnes says Nick Fuentes hates Jews 1:00:10 Every Dr. Fauci Interview 1:01:50 Jewish matchmaking 1:04:00 The Opie & Anthony Show - Anthony "Dice" Seinfeld 1:06:45 Jewish girl prank calls her parents on Z100 1:11:00 Vaush Reacts To A MASK OFF "Pro-White Europe" Video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8N9UILCQ53A 1:15:00 What if there is no such thing as character?, https://medium.com/stoicism-philosophy-as-a-way-of-life/what-if-there-is-no-such-thing-as-character-f71f02a75f02 1:19:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670 1:24:00 Empirical approaches to moral philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-character-empirical/ 1:32:00 The Accidental Superpower: The Next Generation of American Preeminence and the Coming Global Disorder, https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/your-book-review-the-accidental-superpower 1:40:20 Israel is a Giant Machine for Generating Anti-Semitism, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpurS8LyuLI 1:44:30 Fat acceptance 1:48:10 The Psychology of Israel and Palestine | Jordan B Peterson 1:55:00 Pilleater: An Introduction to Al Stankard (HAarlem VEnison), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NcKRIWrIMc 1:56:30 Tucker Carlson on the Left's war on science Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSFVD7Xfhn7sJY8LAIQmH8Q/join https://odysee.com/@LukeFordLive, https://lbry.tv/@LukeFord, https://rumble.com/lukeford https://dlive.tv/lukefordlivestreams Listener Call In #: 1-310-997-4596 Superchat: https://entropystream.live/app/lukefordlive Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lukeford/ Soundcloud MP3s: https://soundcloud.com/luke-ford-666431593 Code of Conduct: https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=125692 https://www.patreon.com/lukeford http://lukeford.net Email me: lukeisback@gmail.com or DM me on Twitter.com/lukeford Support the show | https://www.streamlabs.com/lukeford, https://patreon.com/lukeford, https://PayPal.Me/lukeisback Facebook: http://facebook.com/lukecford Feel free to clip my videos. It's nice when you link back to the original.

Al Fadi and David wood continue their conversation about more reasons why atheist Muslims have trouble with Mohammad moral character . 3. Wife beating. They ask the question , on what basis is it alright to beat your wife?  4. killing the apostates. Mohammad ordered the execution of whoever leaves his religion. Listen for more detailed information.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Al Fadi and David wood continue their conversation about more reasons why atheist Muslims have trouble with Mohammad moral character . 3. Wife beating. They ask the question , on what basis is it alright to beat your wife?  4. killing the apostates. Mohammad ordered the execution of whoever leaves his religion. Listen for more detailed information.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Al Fadi and David wood discuss why do atheist Muslims think that Mohammad was wrong in his moral behavior, giving two examples from the life of Mohammad.  1.. Mohammad marring Ayesha at age 9, before the age of puppetry.  2. Mohammad marrying his adopted son's wife and abolishing adoption. They say that these atheist had no foundation for why it is wrong, because these practices could be acceptable in certain societies and not in others. Listen to the conversation to learn more. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Al Fadi and David wood discuss why do atheist Muslims think that Mohammad was wrong in his moral behavior, giving two examples from the life of Mohammad.  1.. Mohammad marring Ayesha at age 9, before the age of puppetry.  2. Mohammad marrying his adopted son's wife and abolishing adoption. They say that these atheist had no foundation for why it is wrong, because these practices could be acceptable in certain societies and not in others. Listen to the conversation to learn more. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Are we rational? Are we as moral as we think we are? Can we really trust ourselves to make rational ethical decisions? In this episode, we have Dr. Guy Hochman, who is a senior lecturer and the head of the MA program in Behavioral Economics  at Reichman University.Guy received his PhD in organizational psychology from the Technion university and then went on to complete his post-doctorate at Duke University under the supervision of Prof. Dan Ariely. His research focuses on heuristics and biases, behavioral economics, pro-social and anti-social behavior, and the cognitive processes that underlie decision making.We got into some of the basics of behavioral economics and the revolutionary way that this field incorporates the human element into economic research. We'll also explore the idea of ethical decision making, and how such research can help us promote moral behavior and bring about a more ethical society. @YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheBiggerPicturePodcast@Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/biggerpicturepodbyroni/@Website: https://thebiggerpicturepod.com/ This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thebiggerpicturepod.substack.com

Living a moral life pleasing to God

Living a moral life pleasing to God

Living a moral life pleasing to God

Join Naomi Ellemers, author of the Current Directions in Psychological Science article "Neuroscience and the Social Origins of Moral Behavior: How Neural Underpinnings of Social Categorization and Conformity Affect Everyday Moral and Immoral Behavior," for a discussion with the editor.

Interview with Naomi Ellemers, Distinguished University Professor at the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands. Interviewed on November 25, 2020

Intro: Welcome to the podcast Coronavirus Crisis: Carpe Diem!, where by God's grace, you and I rise up and embrace the possibilities and opportunities for spiritual and psychological growth in this time of crisis, all grounded in a Catholic worldview.   We are going beyond mere resilience, to rising up to the challenges of this pandemic and becoming even healthier in the natural and the spiritual realms than we were before.  I'm clinical psychologist Peter Malinoski and I am here with you, to be your host and guide.  This podcast is part of Souls and Hearts, our online outreach at soulsandhearts.com, which is all about shoring up our natural foundation for the Catholic spiritual life, all about overcoming psychological obstacles to being loved and to loving.   Thank you for being here with me.  This is episode 39, released on October 26, 2020 and it is the third episode in our series on shame.   and it is titled: The Real, Radical, and Resounding Differences Between Shame and Guilt.   Two episode ago, in episode 37, we introduced shame as the silent killer who stalks us from within.   Last episode, episode 38, I invited you to see the signs of shame in yourself and others, to recognize shame in ourselves and in others, becoming better able to detect it.      That's important, because shame pulls us to allow our shame to remain hidden, unobserved, unrecognized for what it is.   Shame is tricky, it's slippery, it loves to camouflage itself.  Encourage you to listen to those last two episodes, very rich, RCCD community members discussing listening multiple times, really working on understanding.   Now that we have a much better understanding of shame from the last two episodes, we are going to take the next step. This episode will stand alone, I will give you the context.   Today, in Episode 39.  We are going to understand much more deeply the difference between shame and guilt.  Many people use them interchangeably they don't recognize a difference.  I feel bad with both of them because something is wrong. Shame vs. Guilt  Distinction.  I asked about this in intake evaluations.   Five negative emotions.  Anger, Sadness, Fear, Shame and Guilt.   What's the difference between shame and guilt.   Most people could not tell me the difference.  Rare that someone could give me a good answer.      Do you know the difference between shame and guilt?  Do your siblings know the difference? Does your spouse or significant other, do your friends, your kids, your siblings.   As we will see, it a crucial distinction -- because the upshot is that we work with them in very different ways.    focusing today recognizing the difference between shame and guilt Important psychologically  Important spiritually  Not just an idle curiosity, the kind of thing philosopher like to debate about  But a real world concern Brene Brown: I believe the differences between shame and guilt are critical in informing everything from the way we parent and engage in relationships, to the way we give feedback at work and school.   Bernard Williams (1993) claims that guilt and shame overlap to a significant degree and we will not understand either unless we take both seriously.  Catholic guilt or Catholic shame.   Review.   Shame has been very difficult to define.  Most definitions have been inadequate and very contradictory.   Shame mentioned only once in the entire Catechism of the Catholic Church. CCC1216 on Baptism: Baptism is God's most beautiful and magnificent gift. . . .We call it gift, grace, anointing, enlightenment, garment of immortality, bath of rebirth, seal, and most precious gift. It is called gift because it is conferred on those who bring nothing of their own; grace since it is given even to the guilty; Baptism because sin is buried in the water; anointing for it is priestly and royal as are those who are anointed; enlightenment because it radiates light; clothing since it veils our shame; bath because it washes; and seal as it is our guard and the sign of God's Lordship.  Shame not mentioned in Fr. Hardon's modern Catholic dictionary or in the Traditional Catholic Dictionary or in the 1917 Catholic encyclopedia.  Shame also not listed in the American Psychological Association's Dictionary of Psychology.  Ooops.   Brene Brown: I define shame as the intensely painful feeling or experience of believing that we are flawed and therefore unworthy of love and belonging – something we've experienced, done, or failed to do makes us unworthy of connection. Shame has five dimensions: shame is a primary emotion, shame is a bodily reaction, shame is a signal to us,  shame is an internal self-judgement, and shame is an action -- a verb (review).   Shame as primary emotion--  primary emotions are those that we feel first, as a first response to a situation. They are unthinking, instinctive, automatic emotions that we have.   Heartset Can be conscious or unconscious  Held by a part of us. -- part of us burdened with shame.  Doesn't just come and go in waves  Also a self-conscious emotion  Also a moral emotion.   Shame as a bodily reaction not under bodily control -- bodyset  Hyperarousal -- this is where our sympathetic nervous system revs us up, gets into fight or flight mode in response to shame Heart starts racing  Breathing quickens  Pupils dilate  Blood rushes to arms and legs  Face can flush red  Get ready to defend ourselves or attack or run away  Hypoarousal, when the parasympathetic nervous system shuts us down -- freeze response, like a deer in the headlights Shut down.  Numb out.  Dissociate  Head drops  Breaking off eye contact  Tightening up of muscles, curling up in a ball (spine) -- hunching to protect vital organs.  Making one's body smaller, less visible  Feeling like ice water in the veins, cold freezing sensation  Fluttering in belly.   Shame as a judgment  -- a negative, critical, global judgment of who I am as a person. -- mindset   Part of me holds this disparaging perspective of myself Part of me accuses me of being incompetent, inadequate, worthless, unlovable, bad or even evil, A judgement about who I really am originally picked up from the perspective of an important other who was perceived as critical or rejecting.  Shame as a signal.  Shame has a function as a signal to us, as a warning.   Shame is a signal that there is a lack of attunement or an even more serious threat in one or more of our important relationships.  It has important function Shame functions as a "social threat detector" that signals us to modify or avoid behaviors that will cause us to be rejected by those we need.   Shame as action  -- a verb -- “shaming” is an action that is intended to cause someone else to feel inadequate, worthless, unlovable, a loser, etc.  for being or doing something that the shamer feels is wrong or undesirable. It is a quick way to control another person, especially one in a dependent positions  It is a quick way for us to control ourselves.  Part of us is forced into the role of shamer to anticipate consequences.   Shame has five dimensions: shame is a primary emotion, shame is a bodily reaction, shame is a signal to us,  shame is an internal self-judgement, and shame is an action -- a verb (review).   Definition of Guilt Three primary classes of definitions of guilt -- Moral State, Legal State, and Self-conscious, moral emotion.   Objective moral state Moral state:  Fr. Hardon's Catholic Dictionary:  A condition of a person who has done moral wrong, who is therefore more or less estranged from the one he offended, and who is liable for punishment before he has been pardoned and has made atonement.  Focus on the objective moral state of a person.  Guilt is a moral condition  Soulset -- condition of our soul   Legal state -- court proceedings.  Someone is found guilty of a crime.   Guilt as a self-conscious and a moral emotion -- but not a primary emotion:  American Psychological Association Dictionary of Psychology Guilt is a self-conscious emotion characterized by a painful appraisal of having done (or thought) something that is wrong and often by a readiness to take action designed to undo or mitigate this wrong. It is distinct from shame, in which there is the additional strong fear of one's deeds being publicly exposed to judgment or ridicule.  Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Ph.D., ABPP, is a Professor Emerita of Psychological and Brain Sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Guilt is, first and foremost, an emotion. You may think of guilt as a good way to get someone to do something for you out of a sense of obligation, but it's more accurate to think of guilt as an internal state. In the overall scheme of emotions, guilt is in the general category of negative feeling states.  It's one of the “sad” emotions, which also include agony, grief, and loneliness Negative Emotional Typology see emotionaltypology.com  -  You feel guilty when you did something that caused harm to someone, and you hold yourself at least somewhat responsible. Imagine the feeling of running over the neighbor's dog while backing out of your driveway or mistakenly accusing your daughter of stealing cookies when your spouse actually took them.   Feeling guilty is often associated with moral transgression, i.e. committing a crime or a sin.  We need to distinguish feeling guilty (as an emotional experience) from being guilty (as a legal or moral judgment).  Someone may have committed a severe crime and be tried as guilty, without feeling any guilt.  The opposite can also be true: you can feel guilty when, rationally speaking, you haven't done anything wrong and no one holds you responsible.  For example, imagine you invite a friend to come over, and on the way to your house she has a serious accident. No one blames you, as you had no way of knowing this would happen, but you can nevertheless experience a great deal of guilt. If this happens, you basically mistake a causality – if you hadn't invited her, she would still be alright – with a responsibility – that you could somehow have known or done something to prevent it.   People who feel guilty often have the impulse to undo or repair their wrongdoing, for example, by refunding the financial damage -- a need to right the wrong done.   If the damage is irreversible (e.g., if something unique has been destroyed) or if someone else's trust has been irreversibly betrayed, the guilty person may instead try to atone for his wrongdoing, i.e. by punishing himself.  If someone feels guilty for doing something wrong that other people don't know about, they will have an urge to confess what they did. In all three cases, the explanation seems that the guilt-feeling person wants to demonstrate that she is not a bad person, but merely a good person who did something bad. Review of Guilt Better defined that shame  Simpler -- only three dimension rather than five.   Moral state -- that has been emphasized by the Church  Also a self-conscious moral emotion  characterized by a painful appraisal of having done (or thought) something that is wrong and often by a readiness to take action designed to undo or mitigate this wrong.   Storytime with Dr. Peter I want to take us back to January 1976  I'm in the second semester of first grade at St. Gabriel School in Neenah Wisconsin  It's recess time after lunch -- and it's really, really cold, wind blowing, but in those days, the teachers sent you out for recess to burn off your energy.  So we were playing and running and jumping in the bitter cold sunshine.  All dressed up in a heavy coat, scarf, hat, mittens, snow pants and boots.  Frostbite was a real possibility, and we Wisconsin kids knew how to dress for the cold.  So it's time to come in so the kids are stomping the snow off their boots, unwinding scarves and pulling off mittens, putting everything into the little cubbies we have in the hallway.   And I took my scarf, hat, mittens, coat and boots off, and my snow pants  I am absentminded.  As all my winter gear comes off, my mind a million miles away thinking of a book I've been reading while all the chattering and clamoring of first and second graders goes on around me.  Then the whole hall goes silent.  I undressed too far.  To this day,  I don't know why, but I took my blue corduroy uniform pants off too.  And I am stand there in my mustard yellow uniform shirt, my green cardigan uniform sweater, and my whitey-tighties.  My Fruit of the Loom underwear.  You know it's Froot of the Loom because it says so in big letters on the elastic waistband.     That's right.  What you've had bad dreams about, what has woken you up in a cold sweat, what you were relieved to discover was just a dream -- well, in that hallway in January 1976 was my cold, hard reality.   At that point, everything seemed to go in very slow motion.  I saw the surprised faces of my fellow students, looks of shock and disbelief and a few smirks on the faces of the boys.  I looked down and saw my bare skinny white legs and my pants on the ground.  The blood rushed to face, and I could hardly move.  Jan W., the biggest of the second grade girls she broke the silence by calling out in her big-girl voice -- "Peter took his pants off", accompanied by a pointing finger.  Then there was a collective gasp, then confusion and then a gale of laughter from some of the boys and the whispered twittering of "Did you see that?  He took his pants off!"  I regained control of my body and with amazing rapidity, faster than I ever had before, I leapt into my pants zipped, snapped and belted them, and tried to pretend that nothing had happened.  I was filled with intense self-conscious emotions.     Shame and Guild are both Moral Emotions and self-conscious emotions   Haidt (2003) defines moral emotions as those “that are linked to the interests or welfare either of society as a whole or at least of persons other than the judge or agent” (p. 276). Moral emotions provide the motivational force—the power and energy— to do good and to avoid doing bad  Kroll and Egan 2004.   June Price Tangney, Jeff Stuewig, and Debra J. Mashek  Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior 2011  Annual Review of Psychology Shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride are members of a family of “self-conscious emotions” that are evoked by self-reflection and self-evaluation.  Can be conscious or unconscious These emotions punish or reinforce behaviors shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride function as an emotional moral barometer, providing immediate and salient feedback on our social and moral acceptability. When we sin, transgress, or err, aversive feelings of shame, guilt, or embarrassment are likely to ensue When we “do the right thing,” positive feelings of pride and self-approval are likely to result. The potential for feeling these emotions guides behavior -- can check us from doing wrong.   Shame vs. guilt from Tangney, Steuwig and Mashek 2011 Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior Annual Review of Psychology Three ways to distinguish shame and guilt (List them)  Type of eliciting event, public vs. private nature of the transgression, failure of self vs. failure of behavior.    Mythbusting.   Type of eliciting event -- lying, cheating, stealing, failing to help another, disobeying parents -- some acts lead to feelings of shame, others to feeling of guilt -- no prototypical shame-inducing vs. guilt-inducing behaviors.   Public vs. private nature of transgression Shame arises in public -- due to the exposure and disapproval of others because of some shortcoming or transgression  Guilt happens in private -- an experience arising from the disapproval own's own conscience   Not much research basis for this distinction systematic analysis of the social context of personal shame- and guilt-eliciting events described by several hundred children and adults (Tangney et al. 1994) indicated that shame and guilt are equally likely to be experienced in the presence of others.  Solitary shame experiences were about as common as solitary guilt experiences.  Even more to the point, the frequency with which others were aware of the respondents' behavior did not vary as a function of shame and guilt  contradicts  the public/private distinction.  People focus on other's evaluations because they are already feeling ashamed -- looking for confirmation.  They are not feeling shame because of others' evaluations, which they can easily misinterpret.   Conceptualizing the fault as a failure of self vs. a failure of behavior First proposed in psychological literature by Helen Block Lewis in 1971, updated and revised by Tracy & Robbins (2004) appraisal-based model of self-conscious emotions   Lewis:  Shame  involves negative evaluation of global self.  Guilt involves a negative evaluation of a specific behavior  Listen to the difference:  I did that horrible thing  I did that horrible thing   This third distinction is backed by the research.  experimental and correlational methods showing that internal, stable, uncontrollable attributions for failure were positively related to shame, whereas internal, unstable, controllable attributions for failure were positively related to guilt.  What's the more painful emotion?  Shame.  Shame is the more painful emotion -- because it is about who I am rather than what I did.  It's about all of me.   Shame leads to hiding, guilt leads to amending.   Shame -- hide, escape, deny -- shame inducing experience Guilt -- more likely to lead to reparative behavior Focus of distress Guilt -- focus on the other person -- empathy, reaching out, wanting to make it ok. Research on emotional dispositions demonstrates that guilt-proneness consistently correlates with measures of perspective-taking and empathic concern.  Shame -- self-absorption -- focus on me, reduced capacity for empathetic connections with others.  Research  shame-proneness is (depending on assessment method) negatively or negligibly correlated with other-oriented empathy and positively linked with the tendency to focus egocentrically on one's own distress. Emphasis on the bad self derails the empathetic process.   I'm in my own world of hurt, indequacy, and if I'm worthless and bad, what can I offer anyone else? Reactions to Anger  Shame -- Across individuals of all ages, proneness to shame is positively correlated with anger, hostility, and the propensity to blame factors beyond the self for one's misfortunes  Shame as a disposition: Helen Block Lewis saw this in case studies in 1971 -- Humiliated Fury.   In fact, compared with those who are not shame-prone, shame-prone individuals are more likely to engage in externalization of blame, experience intense anger, and express that anger in destructive ways, including direct physical, verbal, and symbolic aggression, indirect aggression (e.g., harming something important to the target, talking behind the target's back), all manner of displaced aggression, self-directed aggression, and anger held in (a ruminative unexpressed anger). Breaking points.   Finally, shame-prone individuals report awareness that their anger typically results in negative long-term consequences for both themselves and for their relationships with others.  Consistent with these findings, Harper et al. (2005) recently evaluated the link between shame-proneness and perpetration of psychological abuse in the dating relationships by heterosexual college men. Shame proneness was significantly correlated with perpetration of psychological abuse, and men's anger mediated this relationship.   Shaming -- situational factors  For example, in a study of anger episodes among romantically involved couples, shamed partners were significantly more angry, more likely to engage in aggressive behavior, and less likely to elicit conciliatory behavior from their perpetrating significant other (Tangney 1995b).  Empirical evidence for the shame-rage spiral described by Lewis (1971) and Scheff (1987), with (a) partner shame leading to feelings of rage, (b) and destructive retaliation, (c) which then sets into motion anger and resentment in the perpetrator, (d ) as well as expressions of blame and retaliation in kind, (e) which is then likely to further shame the initially shamed partner, and so forth—without any constructive resolution in sight.   Guilt:  Stuewig et al. (2006) examined mediators of the link between moral emotions and aggression in four samples.  They theorized that negative feelings associated with shame lead to externalization of blame, which in turn leads shame-prone people to react aggressively.  Guilt, on the other hand, should facilitate empathic processes, thus reducing outward directed aggression.  As anticipated, we found that across all samples, externalization of blame mediated the relationship between shame-proneness and both verbal and physical aggression.  Guilt-proneness, on the other hand, continued to show a direct inverse relationship to aggression in three of the four samples.  In addition, the link between guilt and low aggression was partially mediated through other-oriented empathy and a propensity to take responsibility. Psychological Symptoms Tangney, Steuwig and Mashek 2011 Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior  Are there intrapersonal or intrapsychic costs for those individuals who are prone to experience shame vs guilt?  Shame Research over the past two decades consistently indicates that proneness to shame is related to a wide variety of psychological symptoms. These run the gamut from low self-esteem, depression, and anxiety to eating disorder symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and suicidal ideation  Robust findings The negative psychological implications of shame are evident across measurement methods, diverse age groups, and populations. Both the clinical literature and empirical research agree that people who frequently experience feelings of shame about the self are correspondingly more vulnerable to a range of psychological problems.   What about guilt Although the traditional view is that guilt plays a significant role in psychological symptoms, the empirical findings have been more equivocal. Clinical theory and case studies make frequent reference to a maladaptive guilt characterized by chronic self-blame and obsessive rumination over one's transgressions  Recently, however, theorists and researchers have emphasized the adaptive functions of guilt, particularly for interpersonal behavior   Illegal, risk, and otherwise ill-advised behaviors Because shame and guilt are painful emotions, it is often assumed that they motivate individuals to avoid doing wrong. From this perspective, anticipated shame and guilt should decrease the likelihood of transgression and impropriety.  Guilt  Tibbetts (2003) found that college students' guilt-proneness was inversely related to self-reported criminal activity.   Among adolescents, proneness to shame-free guilt has been negatively correlated with delinquency (Merisca & Bybee 1994, Stuewig & McCloskey 2005; although Ferguson et al.1999 found a negative relationship between guilt-proneness and externalizing symptoms among boys, the opposite was true for girls).  Guilt-prone college students, too, are less likely to abuse drugs and alcohol (Dearing et al. 2005).  Even among adults already at high risk, guilt-proneness appears to serve a protective function. In a longitudinal study of jail inmates, guilt-proneness assessed shortly after incarceration negatively predicted recidivism and substance abuse during the first year post-release (Tangney et al. 2006).   Shame  In studies of children, adolescents, college students, and jail inmates, shame does not appear to serve the same inhibitory functions as guilt (Dearing et al. 2005, Stuewig & McCloskey 2005, Tangney et al. 1996b).  To the contrary, research suggests that shame may even make things worse. Ferguson et al. (1999) found that shame-proneness was positively correlated with externalizing symptoms on the Child Behavior Checklist.  In a sample of college students, Tibbetts (1997) found a positive relationship between shame-proneness and intentions toward illegal behavior.  Shame-proneness assessed in the fifth grade predicted later risky driving behavior, earlier initiation of drug and alcohol use, and a lower likelihood of practicing safe sex (Tangney & Dearing 2002).  Similarly, proneness to problematic feelings of shame has been positively linked to substance use and abuse in adulthood (Dearing et al. 2005, Meehan et al. 1996, O'Connor et al. 1994, Tangney et al. 2006).   Brene Brown sums it up:  Shame is a focus on self, guilt is a focus on behavior. Shame is “I am bad.” Guilt is “I did something bad.” How many of you, if you did something that was hurtful to me, would be willing to say, “I'm sorry. I made a mistake?” How many of you would be willing to say that? Guilt: I'm sorry. I made a mistake. Shame: I'm sorry. I am a mistake.  Adaptiveness:  Tagney, Stuewig, and Mashek 2011  On balance, guilt appears to be the more adaptive emotion, benefiting individuals and their relationships in a variety of ways, but there is growing evidence that shame is a moral emotion that can easily go awry.   Review --  Return to my story -- Both shame and guilt.   My background -- more prone to guilt than shame.  I had a deep sense of being important to Mom, cherished and valued I also had a deep sense of right and wrong.  Mom and Dad disciplined me, and Mom would always say that it hurt her more than it hurt me (and it looked  like that too.) I had a deep sense of propriety -- proper behavior.  I was taught that you always dressed in my bedroom and that my sister shouldn't see me undressed.   So there was shame -- due to the public nature of my unintentional disrobing -- but not so much for feeling inadequate or worthless or bad.  I had made a mistake, a grievous one in my opinion, but not one that destroyed my sense of self worth.  I felt guilty for exposing the girls of the class to my pants-less state.  Mortified by that.   But the kids reacted as though it was just a mistake.  A curious, remarkable mistake, but just a mistake.  I wasn't an idiot, or a flasher or anything like that.  Just an absentminded kid who took the undressing after recess one step too far.  That was it.   Future directions:   Now we have the basic learning for understanding shame and guilt at the natural level .   We'll also get into the spiritual impact of shame.   We'll get into the so-called "Catholic Guilt" and see if it's really guilt or could it possibly be shame?  Or something else?   We will be moving into more of the space where the psychological and the spiritual overlap.  Soulset   For example, your parts who feels unloved and unlovable, who carry your shame -- how do you think those parts understand God?  Would those shame-burdened parts see God as loving and caring?  Or in some other way? How does your internal critic, you know that voice that has running commentary about your faults and failings, that exacerbating your shame -- how does that part of you see God?  What is the relationship between shame and pride?  How do they connect? How can we learn from examples of shame and guilt in the Scripture? How does Satan use your shame against you?  Remember, grace perfects nature, so it makes sense for Satan to attack at the weak points in your natural foundation.   All here at the Coronavirus crisis Carpe Diem podcast, where harmonize the best of psychology with the Truths of our Catholic Faith. Call to Action  Life Saving Information Shame is the "silent killer who stalks you from within"  Shame is hidden, camouflaged, deceptive, tricky  God wants to involved you -- YOU -- in his plan of salvation for others.  Who might you reach out to Can start by sharing these podcast -- get them out there, with your personal testimonial -- how they have helped you.  Share them, let others know   Listening about shame Use the word shame -- not a perfect word but good enough  Give the definition, the five dimensions   Talking about shame Telling usually doesn't work.   Person struggling with deep shame -- you tell them it's not their fault, they are not bad -- harp music I'm not bad?  Heavens open up --  I'm free -- you just freed me from my shame.  Heavenly voices If you really knew me, you would feel exactly the same way about me.  If you saw who I really was through my eyes, you would know how despicable I am I'm the expert on me, by the way.   Being with others -- but you really have to be dealing with your own shame too.  RCCD community learning together Tough topics -- can work through this critical information yourself, or you can join us and we can do it together.   Cutting edge Conceptually difficult -- you won't get this level of discussion on shame and guilt in most graduate programs in clinical psychology and in almost none will you get the combination of the best of psychology and an authentic Catholic worldview, based on research, the best conceptualizations and also clinical experience.  If any of you can show me a curriculum that goes into this depth on guilt and shame from a Catholic perspective, please send it to me at crisis@soulsandhearts.com Working through guilt and especially shame is critical to our well being on both the natural and spiritual levels -- we know that through clinical experience, and through theoretical conceptualization backed by solid empirical research.  There are serious consequences to unaddressed shame.   You can work through these themes on your own, you can think about these things and apply them to your life by yourself -- but you don't have to.  It's so much better and it's so much more relational to apply this podcast to your life with other serious Catholicss doing the same kind of work on their natural foundation -- Others likeminded Catholics in the Resilient Catholics Carpe Diem Community.   Great discussions -- real life examples.  Vulnerability on the discussion threads  If you are in psychotherapy or counseling, so are many of our RCCD members -- membership and all the resources and the community support -- all that is a great supplement to your therapy work.  Not in therapy?   Great opportunity to take advantage of resources and the relationships and connections so you don't have to do all this on your own.   First office hours last Wednesday, October 21 -- great Q&A on shame, very thought provoking, recorded.   Bonus Podcast from last episode -- shame in marriages  Friendships forming.   Patronness and Patron.  

Video: What On Earth Is Happening - Episode #235 Date: 2020-08-16 Topics: Questions & Clarifications Part 4 For Real This Time, Request to be respectful of purposes for email links given over the air, Big Tech and it's continuing Fascist policies, Proper emotional responses in an age of Deception and Tyranny, Not feeling angry at the injustices taking place in our world means YOU are Spiritually BROKEN, Mask-wearing CLOWNS are all around us, Low-level Satanic front-groups like the Church of Satan are recruiting-grounds for psychopaths to be groomed into higher tiers of the global hierarchical network of Dark Occultism, the so-called "Freedom Movement" doesn't worry the Satanists who rule our world at all, Dark Occultists see the "Freedom Movement" as CLOWNS, Introducing BOBO Da Clown and his musical accompaniment, BOBO is the CLOWN GOD the People of Earth deserve, Our whole world has "Jumped The Shark," Private publishing is completely different than offering services as a Public Utility Platform, Saying "If you don't like Apple's criminal behavior then switch to Linux" is identical to people saying "If you don't like how things are being done in America then leave," Agape (Love of Truth) is how one develops True Authenticity, Importance of the correct order of Truth-Love-Freedom, Secret Societies and Fraternal Orders, the One Great Work is not for other people but for the Love of Truth and the Love of what is Right, the Scamdemic is filled with Satanic symbolism, Why is Sweden not under lockdown?, Australians got Clown-Shoed into giving up their guns, Satanists are winning because the average person refuses to understand how basic co-creation through Moral Behavior actually works, Richard Wetherill's writings on Natural Law and Morality, the Biblical allegory of choosing Barabus over Christ, the Self-Defense Principle is still not fully understood by most people, Violations of one human being's Rights are violations of ALL human beings' Rights, ALL People should and must exercise Personal Responsibility for their own Self Defense and NOT leave it to ANYONE else, least of all totally corrupt institutions, NOT doing that is the very Reason why we are in Bondage. Related Images: Download (zip archive) Related Documents: Invisible Rainbow (ePub) | Invisible Rainbow (PDF)

Video: What On Earth Is Happening - Episode #228 Date: 2020-06-28 Topics: The Psychological State Of Police & Their Supporters Part 2, Mark was interviewed for Magical Egypt III, How To Become The True Media seminar enrollment instructions, Psychological Polarization methodologies, CoVID-19 as a massive Communist takeover of society, Police as Order-followers and Psychopaths, Characteristics of chronic Left-Brain Imbalance, Supporters of Police as Boot-Lickers and Cowards, Characteristics of chronic Reft-Brain Imbalance, the Cult of Politics, Politics is the belief in the shadows on the wall of Plato’s Cave, Objective Truth and First Principles regarding Moral Behavior vs. Immoral Behavior, Proper Moral Education as the True Solutions to human problems, the Satanic Death Cult vs. the Rest of the World, "Oppo-sames" in Politics as a Divide-&-Conquer strategy, the False Left-vs-Right political paradigm, Psychological profile of Police reviewed, Police do the bidding of the world-wide Satanic Death Cult, False Spiritual "Awakening" that many people confuse with True Awakening, the Trap of the human Ego, The Inability to say "I Was Wrong," What it means to be a Truly Good Person, There is no such thing as no such thing as a "Good" Cop, Utilitarianism deconstructed as completely Immoral through the lens of First Principles, Soul Trauma, Spiritual Illness, Damaged Heart-based Intelligence, Eternal Truths regarding Police, Police CAN NOT protect ANYONE, Police DO NOT protect ANYONE, Why ALL Police SHOULD and MUST be ABOLISHED, Kabbalah as a method of Proper Reception, Teachings of Kabbalah related to Natural Law, the Causal Factors of human immorality, Human Nature is that humans are programmable beings, Immoral Behavior is learned or influenced by bad parenting/misinformation/cultural belief systems, False Information leads to Immoral Behavior, the Breakdown of the Ego to allow for integration of True Knowledge and to dissolve false belief systems, Moral Education for children, Systems of Control built upon the false belief of "authority" are always Morally Illegitimate, the Personal Responsibility of Self-Defense can NEVER be abdicated to others, Being rules by a criminal gang that others believe has the "right" to rule is ALWAYS far more dangerous than criminal gangs taking over that no one believes has the "right" to rule them, Mark's quote: “Since humans aren’t angels, NONE are fit to rule.", Self-proclaimed "Christians who believe in the "authority" of Government are all Fake-Ass "Christians.” Related Images: Download (zip archive) Related Links: Enroll In The "How To Become The TRUE Media" Online Technology Seminar | Donate To Help Complete Mark's Natural Law Documentary | Magical Egical Documentary Series

https://www.matrickz.de In this episode, Prof. Rolf Jung answers some questions about the important characteristic for working in the functional safety area. Watch the whole episode here: https://youtu.be/SN3X1TWLOew #autonomouscar #autonomous #automotive #selfdriving #softwaredevelopment #matrickz #AUTOSAR #future #automotiveindustry #matrickztv #autonomous #safety #security

Note: Sorry for the "tin can" sound quality on this one. Audio went a little haywire with my microphone, but it's still a-okay to listen to. Promise :) In EP 57, Christine shares research about how the media - TV and magazines in particular - affects the moral beliefs and behavior of both adolescents and adults. It should come as no surprise that seeing on the big screen or reading in print certain behaviors normalizes them to viewers/readers and can have disastrous consequences on individual behavior and culture-wide mores.  ---- Need help answering some basic questions about Christianity and Catholicism? Then be sure and grab The Catholic Mama's How to Talk to Your Kids about God, available for FREE here.

In this episode of The Catholic Mama, Catholic evangelist Christine Mooney-Flynn talks about how Media affects Moral Behavior and Beliefs. (August 11, 2019)

Moral behavior can be applied easier if we understand some things about the origin of how and why moral principles and concepts evolve. In this episode, Dr. Scoresby discusses God, science, and society and shows how these origins lead to three different types of morality, which is where we usually get our ideas. You can see where the ideas came from and hear examples of how to apply them.

In this episode we talk to Peter Gray, professor of psychology at Boston College, about school, self-directed education and the many ways children learn and how adults help and impede this impulse to learn. We get into a short history of compulsory education, the alternatives to schooling that are currently available, and how our views of children’s capacities to learn and what they actually need to learn influence how we let them develop and the freedom we give them. What do we actually know about children who doesn’t follow the standard path through the school system, and how do they fare in a world that is as skill and knowledge based as our own? Much better than we would expect, and Peter Gray has some research and experience to back that claim up. Peter briefly gets into different concepts like homeschooling, unschooling, self-directed learning and self-directed education, and why he prefers the latter. Peter Gray has also written a lot about the value of age mixing in children and adolescents, and how free play constitutes an essential element in children’s social, emotional and cognitive development (if it even makes sense to distinguish between these three aspects of personality). We would have loved to get into these questions more, but for now we’ll just have to direct you to his blog and his book Free to learn (2013) To conclude, here’s a quote from his blog, an article about the developmental psychologist Alison Gopnik and her excellent book, The Carpenter and the Gardener, which gives us a clear idea of where Gray stands when it comes to new psychological research and the implications for school and education:   «OK, I’m a little frustrated and I guess I’m showing it.  There are so many smart and good-willed people in academia who, like Gopnik, seem to get it, but who then fail to come to the logical conclusion and fail even to look at the real-world evidence that their ideas beg them to examine. The evidence has been out there for a long time that it is possible to develop learning spaces where children and teenagers can learn naturally; and the evidence has been out there for a long time that children and teenagers develop beautifully, in highly varied ways, like flowers in a garden, in those spaces; and the evidence has been out there for a long time that such learning spaces are far less expensive and less trouble to operate than are standard schools, precisely because they work with children’s nature rather than against it. And yet academia continues to blind itself to that evidence.  Why?» https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/freedom-learn/201608/alison-gopnik-s-advice-parents-stop-parenting     Links to articles, podcast episodes and lectures:   Peter Gray’s blog Freedom to learn on Psychology Today: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/freedom-learn  The Alliance for Self-Directed Education https://www.self-directed.org/ Let grow, https://letgrow.org/   Some selected video lectures: «How our schools thwart passions», TEDx Ashbury Park, 16.juli 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coMXLy8RBIc «The decline of play», TEDx Navesink, 13.juni 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg-GEzM7iTk «Mother Nature’s pedagogy: Insights from Evolutionary Psychology», Chicago Ideas, 30.jan. 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2BAJ_svbhA   Articles: Peter Gray og David Chanoff, «Democratic Schooling: What Happens to Young People Who Have Charge of Their Own Education?», American Journal of Education, Vol.94, No.2, (Feb.,1986), pp.182-213 http://www.alternatifokullar.com/files/2014/01/dem_oku_mak_gray_chanoff.pdf Peter Gray, “The Special Value of Children’s Age-Mixed Play”, American Journal of Play, vol.3, no.4, 2011, pp.500-522 https://www.psychologytoday.com/files/attachments/1195/ajp-age-mixing-published.pdf Intervju med Peter Gray, “Play as Preparation for Learning and Life”, American Journal of Play, vol.5, no.3, pp.271-292 http://www.journalofplay.org/sites/www.journalofplay.org/files/pdf-articles/5-3-interview-play-as-preparation.pdf Jay Feldman, “The Moral Behavior of Children and Adolescents at a Democratic School”, lecture at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Foundation, April 2001, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED453128.pdf ---------------------------- Our logo is by Sveinung Sudbø, visit originalkopi.com for more of his excellent works. The music is by Arne Kjelsrud Mathisen, visit the facebook page Nygrenda Vev og Dur for more info.   ---------------------------- Thank you so much for listening and sharing. Contact us on our facebook page Lars og Pål, or via larsogpaal@gmail.com So far we have only two episodes in English (listen to episode 25, our interview with journalist Scott Carney, about Wim Hof, skepticism and the pleasures and benefits of the cold), but as we explore other topics that make us curious, we’re surely going to reach out to experts and other interesting people in the English speaking world. Thank you for all feedback, tips and wishes for future episodes.  All the best, Lars og Pål

Today I answer a listener question about why do so many pickup artists and other men's dating advice people turn into extremists in general and white supremacists in particular. Remember to check out the “Killmonger Was Right” and “Team Killmonger” gear at http://killmongerwasright.com which also helps to support the show. Support the show and get double the episodes by subscribing to bonus episodes for $5/month at patreon.com/champagnesharks.  If you can’t subscribe right now for whatever reason, do the next best thing and tell as many people as you know about the show. Also, remember to review and rate the podcast in Itunes: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/champ…d1242690393?mt=2. Also, check out the Champagne Sharks reddit at http://reddit.com/r/champagnesharks. Also check out Champagne Sharks on Twitter at http://twitter.com/champagnesharks. Opening Song: "A Love That's Worth Having" by Willie Hutch Closing Song: "Nostalgia" by Dao Paoro (RAC Mix) Discussed in this episode: The academic study by June Tangney, Jeff Stuewig, and Debra J. Mashek, "Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior." https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/78b9/1838627eb2c02e07c2fb544acd004edac7e4.pdf June Tangney's book summarizing all her research, Shame and Guilt http://amzn.to/2FhGU5j  

Monika Betzler ist Professorin für Praktische Philosophie und Ethik an der LMU München.

Monika Betzler ist Professorin für Praktische Philosophie und Ethik an der LMU München.

Walter Mischel is Robert Johnston Niven Professor of Humane Letters in Psychology at the University of Columbia. [The CAS research focus "Moral Behavior" presents four lectures on willpower.] Representatives of the fields of philosophy, psychology and economics discuss the question of how strength and weakness of will affect decision-making processes, as well as the role of self-control.

Walter Mischel is Robert Johnston Niven Professor of Humane Letters in Psychology at the University of Columbia. [The CAS research focus "Moral Behavior" presents four lectures on willpower.] Representatives of the fields of philosophy, psychology and economics discuss the question of how strength and weakness of will affect decision-making processes, as well as the role of self-control.

[The CAS research focus "Moral Behavior" presents four lectures on willpower.] Representatives of the fields of philosophy, psychology and economics discuss the question of how strength and weakness of will affect decision-making processes, as well as the role of self-control.

Richard Holton is Professor for Philosophy at the University of Cambridge. [The CAS research focus "Moral Behavior" presents four lectures on willpower.] Representatives of the fields of philosophy, psychology and economics discuss the question of how strength and weakness of will affect decision-making processes, as well as the role of self-control.

Initially an outgrowth of the desire to keep newborns and infants alive, the American child-rearing advice industry grew to become a means to influence American children of all ages. During the twentieth century, advice moved from issues of physical survival to psychological well-being, and from normal development to cognitive success. As doctors, psychologists and other professionals penetrated into the lives of middle class parents and their children, they contributed to the growing self-consciousness and accompanying anxiety of mothers regarding their responsibilities. In this context, Dr. Benjamin Spock emerged as the towering figure in post-World War II America parenting advice.

Initially an outgrowth of the desire to keep newborns and infants alive, the American child-rearing advice industry grew to become a means to influence American children of all ages. During the twentieth century, advice moved from issues of physical survival to psychological well-being, and from normal development to cognitive success. As doctors, psychologists and other professionals penetrated into the lives of middle class parents and their children, they contributed to the growing self-consciousness and accompanying anxiety of mothers regarding their responsibilities. In this context, Dr. Benjamin Spock emerged as the towering figure in post-World War II America parenting advice.

What is the relationship between attachment and the virtues and vices of character? What are the implications of the answer for characterfocused public policy? This conference is the first in a projected series of three meetings designed to address these questions. Since Aristotle said that "to experience [an emotion] at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner: that is … a mark of virtue", and the capacity successfully to regulate emotion is also associated with security of attachment, the regulation of emotion is a natural point at which to initiate the wider investigation. | Center for Advanced Studies LMU: International Conference "Attachment, Virtue and the Regulation of Emotion" | 25.-26.02.2016

What is the relationship between attachment and the virtues and vices of character? What are the implications of the answer for characterfocused public policy? This conference is the first in a projected series of three meetings designed to address these questions. Since Aristotle said that "to experience [an emotion] at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner: that is … a mark of virtue", and the capacity successfully to regulate emotion is also associated with security of attachment, the regulation of emotion is a natural point at which to initiate the wider investigation. | Center for Advanced Studies LMU: International Conference "Attachment, Virtue and the Regulation of Emotion" | 25.-26.02.2016

What is the relationship between attachment and the virtues and vices of character? What are the implications of the answer for characterfocused public policy? This conference is the first in a projected series of three meetings designed to address these questions. Since Aristotle said that "to experience [an emotion] at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner: that is … a mark of virtue", and the capacity successfully to regulate emotion is also associated with security of attachment, the regulation of emotion is a natural point at which to initiate the wider investigation. | Center for Advanced Studies LMU: International Conference "Attachment, Virtue and the Regulation of Emotion" | 25.-26.02.2016

What is the relationship between attachment and the virtues and vices of character? What are the implications of the answer for characterfocused public policy? This conference is the first in a projected series of three meetings designed to address these questions. Since Aristotle said that "to experience [an emotion] at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner: that is … a mark of virtue", and the capacity successfully to regulate emotion is also associated with security of attachment, the regulation of emotion is a natural point at which to initiate the wider investigation. | Center for Advanced Studies LMU: International Conference "Attachment, Virtue and the Regulation of Emotion" | 25.-26.02.2016

What is the relationship between attachment and the virtues and vices of character? What are the implications of the answer for characterfocused public policy? This conference is the first in a projected series of three meetings designed to address these questions. Since Aristotle said that "to experience [an emotion] at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner: that is … a mark of virtue", and the capacity successfully to regulate emotion is also associated with security of attachment, the regulation of emotion is a natural point at which to initiate the wider investigation. | Center for Advanced Studies LMU: International Conference "Attachment, Virtue and the Regulation of Emotion" | 25.-26.02.2016

What is the relationship between attachment and the virtues and vices of character? What are the implications of the answer for characterfocused public policy? This conference is the first in a projected series of three meetings designed to address these questions. Since Aristotle said that "to experience [an emotion] at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner: that is … a mark of virtue", and the capacity successfully to regulate emotion is also associated with security of attachment, the regulation of emotion is a natural point at which to initiate the wider investigation. | Center for Advanced Studies LMU: International Conference "Attachment, Virtue and the Regulation of Emotion" | 25.-26.02.2016

What is the relationship between attachment and the virtues and vices of character? What are the implications of the answer for characterfocused public policy? This conference is the first in a projected series of three meetings designed to address these questions. Since Aristotle said that "to experience [an emotion] at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner: that is … a mark of virtue", and the capacity successfully to regulate emotion is also associated with security of attachment, the regulation of emotion is a natural point at which to initiate the wider investigation. | Center for Advanced Studies LMU: International Conference "Attachment, Virtue and the Regulation of Emotion" | 25.-26.02.2016

What is the relationship between attachment and the virtues and vices of character? What are the implications of the answer for characterfocused public policy? This conference is the first in a projected series of three meetings designed to address these questions. Since Aristotle said that "to experience [an emotion] at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner: that is … a mark of virtue", and the capacity successfully to regulate emotion is also associated with security of attachment, the regulation of emotion is a natural point at which to initiate the wider investigation. | Center for Advanced Studies LMU: International Conference "Attachment, Virtue and the Regulation of Emotion" | 25.-26.02.2016

So many of our most common resolutions for personal improvement are inherently narcissistic: Quit smoking, lose weight, get in shape. We want to look sexier, feel stronger and live forever. But beyond this alternately self-gratifying and self-flagellating topography lies the most quintessential self-improvement project of all: Being a better person. Can science show us how to re-engineer our moral behavior and live better lives? Robert and Joe explore. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://news.iheart.com/podcast-advertisers

Gavin Dingman, an 11-year old from Michigan, killed an albino deer. Many people are upset about this, with some even making death threats to Gavin. It is tragic when any healthy animal is killed for “sport” or any other purpose. And it is tragic that we teach our children that violence is “fun.” But those […] The post Moral Schizophrenia–Again, and Again, and Again appeared first on Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach. Related posts: Moral Concern, Moral Impulse, and Logical Argument in Animal Rights Advocacy Moral Behavior and Moral Significance Mary Bale, Michael Vick, and Moral Schizophrenia Yet Another Example of Moral Schizophrenia Moral Schizophrenia: Alastair Graham, the “Michael Vick” of Scotland Click here to play

It's a reloaded Garage Hour from the good (bad) old days of gearhead radio, with a proper discussion of the terrorist attacks from September 11, 2001, plus a little bit about the morality of those involved and how to spot the wrong side of the conflicting persons and pablum stacking up high on each side of the conversation. Have no fear - this good gearhead radio, so sometime cohost Joe "Creature" Krause joins Dirty Dave and Black Ryan (before he got his nickname) for a sporty hour of off-roading, trail access, drag racing (and the challenge that is launching any sort of Beetle-based drag car), road and track runs that don't kill anyone, Hayabusa tire wear, Fine Firearm's grand opening in downtown La Mesa, CA, and a call-in from cohost Mr. Dustin (Top Earner) for a full report of the Testament/Slayer/Megadeth show that everyone else missed too...  Dammit.

It is often assumed that what is considered normal behavior is also moral and what is considered abnormal behavior is also immoral. This assumption seems based on the idea that human beings are essentially "good" and that when we see what we might consider "evil" we are seeing the unusual or the deviant. I suggest that these assumptions are defense mechanisms and represent our need to escape from our own and societal acts that might be considered evil. Our behaviors are shaped by evolution and our need to continue eating before we end up being eaten. We will discuss how our animal evolution has created our sense of morality and how our sense of morality involves protecting our kin and tribe while vanquishing all competitors. 

As part of our Science and the Seven Deadly Sins series, Dr. Paul Zak discusses his work studying the relation of hormones to human behavior. Specifically, his research focuses on oxytocin's role in regulating generosity and greed. For an interview with Dr. Zak about the crisis in confidence in psychology, science communication, and how to differentiate between sound science and pseudoscience, click here.

One of the central tenants in the debate about religion, is that some claim it provides the only construct for understanding moral behavior. In fact, science, research and even our own pets should tell us clearly that empathy, cooperation, fairness and reciprocity are all traits we see in animal behavior. This is particularly true of the primates. And just as the monstrous instinct exists in all of us, including animals, so to do the traits of social cooperation. It’s simply the other side of the same coin. No one has done a better job of explaining this than Frans De Waal in his new work The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism Among the Primates.My conversation with Frans De Waal: var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-6296941-2"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

This Day in Skepticism - Captain Picard Day; News Items: LiDar, Extremophiles, Moral Behavior, Cervical Manipulation, Ghost Train; Who's That Noisy; Your Questions and E-mails: Pharmacist Homeopaths; Name That Logical Fallacy; Science or Fiction

This Day in Skepticism - Captain Picard Day; News Items: LiDar, Extremophiles, Moral Behavior, Cervical Manipulation, Ghost Train; Who's That Noisy; Your Questions and E-mails: Pharmacist Homeopaths; Name That Logical Fallacy; Science or Fiction

Should the research on moral psychology be interpreted as suggesting new approaches for improving, or perhaps enhancing, moral intuitions, attitudes, judgments, and behavior or for reforming social institutions? Can we create more effective educational tools for improving moral development? For the last century psychiatry has attempted to medicalize moral failings - lack of self-control, addiction, anger, impatience, fear. But what of engineering ourselves to higher states of virtue? If the enhancement of morality is possible, which virtues or cognitive capabilities will it be safe to enhance and how? What might be the unanticipated side effects of attempts to enhance moral behavior?

Should the research on moral psychology be interpreted as suggesting new approaches for improving, or perhaps enhancing, moral intuitions, attitudes, judgments, and behavior or for reforming social institutions? Can we create more effective educational tools for improving moral development? For the last century psychiatry has attempted to medicalize moral failings - lack of self-control, addiction, anger, impatience, fear. But what of engineering ourselves to higher states of virtue? If the enhancement of morality is possible, which virtues or cognitive capabilities will it be safe to enhance and how? What might be the unanticipated side effects of attempts to enhance moral behavior?

Should the research on moral psychology be interpreted as suggesting new approaches for improving, or perhaps enhancing, moral intuitions, attitudes, judgments, and behavior or for reforming social institutions? Can we create more effective educational tools for improving moral development? For the last century psychiatry has attempted to medicalize moral failings - lack of self-control, addiction, anger, impatience, fear. But what of engineering ourselves to higher states of virtue? If the enhancement of morality is possible, which virtues or cognitive capabilities will it be safe to enhance and how? What might be the unanticipated side effects of attempts to enhance moral behavior?

Should the research on moral psychology be interpreted as suggesting new approaches for improving, or perhaps enhancing, moral intuitions, attitudes, judgments, and behavior or for reforming social institutions? Can we create more effective educational tools for improving moral development? For the last century psychiatry has attempted to medicalize moral failings - lack of self-control, addiction, anger, impatience, fear. But what of engineering ourselves to higher states of virtue? If the enhancement of morality is possible, which virtues or cognitive capabilities will it be safe to enhance and how? What might be the unanticipated side effects of attempts to enhance moral behavior?

Should the research on moral psychology be interpreted as suggesting new approaches for improving, or perhaps enhancing, moral intuitions, attitudes, judgments, and behavior or for reforming social institutions? Can we create more effective educational tools for improving moral development? For the last century psychiatry has attempted to medicalize moral failings - lack of self-control, addiction, anger, impatience, fear. But what of engineering ourselves to higher states of virtue? If the enhancement of morality is possible, which virtues or cognitive capabilities will it be safe to enhance and how? What might be the unanticipated side effects of attempts to enhance moral behavior?