Podcasts about Ivan Pavlov

Dr. Raffa and Catarina explore the history and work of Dr. Ivan Pavlov, and identify where his contributions can still be found today. Do you think his name rings any bells?Welcome to Talk Therapy CBT | Conversation about Educating, Connecting, Helping Individuals to the World of Psychology.We would like to thanks our sponsor : Dr. Alba Raphaela, you can buy her book about : Breaking the Mirror : A Story & Guide on how to recognize and deal with a narcissist. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09HFRNWYC/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_3NW8EE01F8A6G4KGNW56This podcast is sponsored by (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) -  Inner Balance Psychology Center, Psychological Treatment and Evaluations for Children, Adolescents and AdultsAs solution-focused therapists, our goal is to help you uncover your true potential and lead a life that is worth celebrating. While we can't change difficult situations of the past, we can work together to better understand and resolve challenges in your life. By applying complementary therapy approaches and techniques, we will unearth long-standing behavior patterns or negative perceptions that may be holding you back from experiencing a more fulfilling and meaningful life.Follow Us on Social Media:Blog : (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/blog/ )FAQs : ( https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/faqs/ )Facebook : (https://www.facebook.com/ibpcllc)Instagram : (https://www.Instagram.com/innerbalancepsychology) Check out our website for more information :  (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) or email Dr. Raffa : (dawnraffa@innerbalancepsychology.com)This podcast is hosted by  and produced by (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/) Please consider subscribing and sharing this episode if you found it entertaining or informative. If you want to go the extra mile, you can leave us a rating or review which helps the show with rankings and algorithms on certain platforms. you can leave us a review on Podchaser or Apple Podcasts Make sure you're subscribed to the podcast so you get the latest episodes. Our Podcast Page : (https://www.innerbalancepsychology.com/)(Subscribe with Apple Podcast)(Follow on Spotify)(Subscribe with Stitcher)(Subscribe on IHeartRadio )(Listen on other streaming platforms) DISCLAIMEROpinions expressed are solely the hosts and guest(s) and do not represent or express the views or opinions of Inner Balance Psychology

Looking to boost your charisma and become more likable? In this video, we'll explore the chameleon effect and attitude similarity to help unlock your charisma!The Science of Likability: 67 Evidence-Based Methods to Radiate Charisma, Make a Powerful Impression, Win Friends, and Trigger Attraction (4th Ed.) (The Psychology of Social Dynamics Book 12) By: Patrick KingHear it Here - https://adbl.co/3BXFuHQhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/B09RW4ZJB3Discover the science behind being liked and loved by everyone around you. In this groundbreaking video, we dive deep into the 4th edition of Patrick King's bestseller "The Science of Likability" to reveal evidence-based methods that will make you radiate charm, impress others, win friends, and attract people effortlessly.Based on over 67 seminal scientific studies and psychological research, including works from renowned minds like Sigmund Freud, Ivan Pavlov, Stanley Schachter, and Daniel Goleman, this video distills actionable insights into a comprehensive guide for personal growth and social success. Learn how to subconsciously make yourself likable, trustworthy, and intelligent by understanding what makes people tick and strategically applying these findings in your daily life.Our expert analysis covers topics such as creating equity within relationships, the power of similarity in friendships, using eye contact to build trust, and even how tripping or vulnerability can positively impact social dynamics. You'll also discover universal definitions of charisma, wit, and humor, alongside practical tips on eye contact, touch, and charm.Unlock the hidden force that propels people forward - likability - which opens doors to better career opportunities, love life, relationships, and friendships. Embrace Patrick King's science-backed wisdom to become someone's favorite person and experience the transformative power of likability in your life.Don't miss out on this chance to hear it here: https://adbl.co/3BXFuHQDiscover how to create a foundation for friendship, embrace the psychology of social dynamics, and master the art of making people love you. Watch now and start radiating charisma today!

Quand l'homme perd la tête. Privation sensorielle, drogues, électrochocs, lavage de cerveaux, lobotomie ou encore hypnose, la plupart des gouvernements se sont livrés à des expériences secrètes terrifiantes pour abolir la volonté, endoctriner ou soumettre les individus. Dans cet épisode, Gaël et Geoffroy mobilisent leur matière grise pour retracer l'histoire de ces effroyables recherches scientifiques et mettre à jour les nombreux programmes clandestins qui ont cherché à développer des techniques de manipulation mentale dans le but d'exercer un contrôle total sur l'esprit humain. Musique : Thibaud R. Habillage sonore / mixage : Alexandre Lechaux Facebook Instagram  X www.toutsavoir.fr Contact : tousparano@gmail.com

Send us a textThis bonus podcast delves into the life and work of Ivan Pavlov, the controversial Russian physiologist/psychologist famous for his ground-breaking research on classical conditioning through experiments with dogs. The episode starts with a biography of Pavlov, covering his early life, education, and personal struggles, including financial hardships and family tragedies.Pavlov's academic and research journey is explored, from his initial interest in physics and mathematics to his pivotal work on the physiology of digestion in dogs. His discoveries on conditional reflexes, also known as classical conditioning, led to significant contributions in the field of psychology, particularly in behaviour therapy. We examines Pavlov's impact on education, where his principles of classical conditioning laid the foundation for behaviour modification practices and antecedent-based interventions in classrooms.Next, the episode shifts to a critical analysis of Pavlov's theory and practice from a Christian perspective, highlighting concerns related to reductionism and materialism, deterministic worldview, ethical concerns in experimentation, and the reduction of human behaviour to observable responses. It emphasizes the importance of understanding human beings as made in God's image, possessing free will, emotions, and moral reasoning, all factors not accounted for in Pavlov's theories.Pavlov's theory of classical conditioning has had a significant impact on the field of psychology and our understanding of learning and behaviour. However, when viewed from a Christian perspective, there are several aspects of his theory and practice that raise ethical and theological concerns. I hope you find it interesting.For an ad-free version of the podcast plus the opportunity to enjoy hours of exclusive content and two bonus episodes a month and also help keep the Bible Project Daily Podcast free  for listeners everywhere at;patreon.com/JeremyMcCandlessSubscribe here to receive my new church history podcast every few weeks at.Episode Title: The Death of MosesSupport the showJeremy McCandless is creating podcasts and devotional resources | PatreonHelp us continue making great content for listeners everywhere.https://thebibleproject.buzzsprout.com

  This week we read listener messages and Brian shares what he's learned about the famous dog trainer Ivan Pavlov. Then he breaks down Halloween 2024 at the Beaudoin Household: he was visited by tick-or-treaters singing Wu-Tang , and he learned something about himself.  We find out that his Halloween Potatoes are famous, kids were begging for them and folks weretalking about them on social media. Then we find out that last week Frank got an exclusive interview with the President-Elect , King Donald Day-J Trump. Go to StonerDadPodcast.com for links to each show, our Patreon, and all things Stoner Dad. #StonerDad #StonerDadPodcast #BrianBeaudoin #CoryG #PavlovsDogs #MötleyCrüe #SarahMclachlan #TheRadison #StandupComedy #Comedy

Welcome back to THE IAS COMPANION. Follow us on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@IASCompanion. In today's lecture, we will discuss Classical Conditioning in Psychology. Classical conditioning is a fundamental learning process first described by Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist. It involves creating associations between a neutral stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus to produce a conditioned response. This lecture will explore the basic principles, laws, and theories of classical conditioning, enriched with examples to illustrate the concepts. #UPSC #IASprep #civilserviceexam #IASexamination #IASaspirants #UPSCjourney #IASexam #civilservice #IASgoals #UPSC2024 #IAS2024 #civilservant #IAScoaching #aUPSCmotivation #IASmotivation #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAS #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAStips #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity

24 prisoners were released in the largest Russia-West prisoner swap since the Cold War. Lawyer Ivan Pavlov commented on this news in a conversation with SBS Russian. - Ночью с 01 на 02 августа по австралийскому времени произшел крупнейший обмен заключенными между Россией и рядом стран Запада со времен Холодной войны. Иван Павлов, адвокат и создатель ряда правозащитных проектов, прокомментировал эту новость в разговоре с SBS Russian.

This is the weekly columnTasting science used to be so simple. Alas, no more.Back in 1901, a German scientist opined various taste receptors were orderly segregated on your tongue in specific places. Sweet on your tip, salty on the sides, sour behind them, bitter in the back. Nice, neat, wrong.Modern science—the flawed German study is from 1901—confirms the perception of taste is remarkably complex and not limited to your tongue. Judging flavors is deeply integrated into what is good for you to eat and what is not, so it should be no surprise that hundreds of thousands of years of tasting experience created a complex and extremely sophisticated human palate. If it had not, you and I would not be around to read about this.Yes, it does start with the tongue. Sensors alert the brain when they encounter nutrients or toxins. Pleasure or poison is the first threshold. Horrible, you instinctively spit it out. But your response does not stop after that initial pass-fail taste test. When alerted, your gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, fat cells, brain, muscle cells, and lungs also spring into action. Your tongue taste buds alert your body in the same way an airport system responds to an airplane coming in for a landing. Your tongue may be the control tower, but it only sets everything else into motion.Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist who won a Nobel Prize for his studies on digestion in 1904, showed lumps of meat placed directly into a hole in the dog's stomach would not be digested unless he dusted the dog's tongue with some dried meat powder to start things off. Dog food, wine. Who knew they would be connected?I do not know of scientific studies to back me up, but I assert there is a connection between wine—essentially liquid fruit—and your body's collective response to nourishment. Wine has complemented our food for at least 8,000 years, likely longer. When human beings find something that works, they tend to expand upon it.Cheers.Tasting notes• Rainstorm Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley, Oregon 2022: Bright, fresh with good tartness, citrus. Delightful wine with the tartness and acidity to pair well with lighter fare. $16-18 Link to my review• Ramōn Bilbao Verdejo, Rueda 2022: Crisp, fruity, refreshing. Bright, inviting, vibrant pleasure in the mouth. $18-23 Link to my review• Becker Vineyards Prairie Cuvée, Texas High Plains 2019: Light, refreshing, full fruity flavor. Classic Rhône blend using Texas-grown grapes by substantial player in state's ascendency in the wine world. $25 Link to my reviewLast roundCommas are so very important. “Your dinner” (no comma) leaves you nourished. “You're dinner” (comma) leaves you eaten. Wine time. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit gusclemens.substack.com/subscribe

Education News Headline RoundupBook bannings and classroom content updates from around the U.S.:From the Guardian: In Florida, a children's book titled "Ban This Book" by Alan Gratz, which ironically addresses the issue of book banning, was itself banned by the Indian River county school board.From the AP: In Oklahoma, the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously that local school boards, not the state Board of Education, have the authority to decide which books are available in public school libraries. This decision overturned attempts by the state Board of Education to remove certain books from Edmond Public Schools' library.Oklahoma public schools are now required to keep and teach from a copy of the Bible in every classroom in grades 5-12. Teachers are being encouraged to provide Biblical instruction due to the book's “substantial influence on our nation's founders and the foundational principles of our Constitution.” Oklahoma's Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters stated that teachers in non-compliance could lose their licenses. In related news, Louisiana also became the first state to require that the Ten Commandments be displayed in every public school classroom.The American Library Association reports “the number of titles targeted for censorship surged 65% in 2023 compared to 2022.We recently hosted a discussion on legacy admissions and “side door,” donation-motivated college admissions when we discussed the Varsity Blues scandal on this podcast; now, a bill passed by the California state Assembly may bring financial penalties to private higher education institutions for giving admissions preference to children of alumni and donors.The University of Colorado Boulder is retiring remote exam proctoring and monitoring technology Proctorio, citing low usage after a return to in-person instruction post COVID-19 pandemic. CU Boulder is not the first university to experience student pushback (hear our discussion of the statement on Proctorio issued by the Union of Students in Ireland in episode 102).Behaviorism in Education: The Legacy of B.F. SkinnerIn this episode, we investigate the life and work of B.F. Skinner, the pioneering psychologist who transformed our understanding of behaviorism and left deep marks on classrooms, schools, and methods of instruction. Discover how Skinner's theories on behavior modification, reinforcement, and punishment continue to influence modern education and classroom management.Highlights:Early Life and Influences: Learn about Skinner's journey from aspiring writer to groundbreaking psychologist, influenced by the works of Ivan Pavlov and John B. Watson.Operant Conditioning: Understand the principles of operant conditioning and how Skinner's research with rats and pigeons laid the foundation for behaviorist approaches in education.The Skinner Box and Other Oddities and Experiments: Explore the development of the operant conditioning chamber, famously known as the "Skinner Box," and its role in studying animal behavior. Be sure to stick around for a discussion of… (checks notes…) war pigeons?Educational Impact: Join a discussion of how Skinner's theories have shaped modern educational practices, including the use of positive and negative reinforcement, token economies, and programmed instruction.Controversies and Criticisms: Delve into the ethical debates surrounding behaviorist techniques and their application in both educational and social contexts.Legacy in Education: Katie and Chelsea Reflect on Skinner's lasting impact on educational technology and teaching methodologies.Discussion Questions:Has Skinner's focus on observable and measurable behaviors had an overall positive or negative impact on formal educational systems?How much behavior modification is too much when it comes to classroom instruction, and what are the ethical implications of applying behaviorist principles in schools?With new research questioning the efficacy of extrinsic rewards, how do we reconcile Skinnerian approaches to motivation in modern education?Sources & Resources:Book about book bans banned by Florida school board | Books | The GuardianOklahoma Supreme Court rejects state education board's authority over public school libraries | AP Newshttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/louisiana-to-become-first-state-to-require-that-the-ten-commandments-be-displayed-in-every-public-school-classroomWatch out Stanford. California is eyeing a new legacy admission ban | PoliticoCalifornia May Ban Legacy Admissions at Universities - The New York TimesA New National Student Organization Is Taking Aim At Legacy AdmissionsProctorio | Office of Information TechnologyStudents Are Pushing Back Against Proctoring Surveillance Apps | Electronic Frontier FoundationBiographical Information – B. F. Skinner FoundationProject Pigeon - WikipediaB.F. Skinner's Pigeon-Guided Rocket | SmithsonianUnderstanding Behavioral Psychology: the Skinner BoxBehaviourism | Classical & Operant Conditioning, Reinforcement & Shaping | BritannicaBehaviorism In PsychologyTHE IMPLICATION OF THE LEARNING THEORIES ON IMPLEMENTING E-LEARNING COURSESWhat Kind of Dog Was Pavlov's Dog? | SmithsonianPavlov, Watson, Skinner, And Behaviorism | Kate VotawB.F. Skinner Raised His Daughter in a Skinner Box? | Snopes.comMystery solved: We now know what happened to Little AlbertOperant Conditioning: What Is It and How It WorksReinforcement and Punishment – General PsychologyBehaviorism in Education: What Is Behavioral Learning Theory?Skinner's Behaviourism - New Learning OnlineOklahoma Superintendent Ryan Walters orders schools to teach the BibleOklahoma schools head Ryan Walters: Teachers who won't teach Bible could lose licenseSkinner's Reinforcement Theory in the Classroom | Teaching ChannelWhy B.F. Skinner May Have Been The Most Dangerous Psychologist EverThe Engineered Student: On B. F. Skinner's Teaching Machine | The MIT Press Reader 

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Shard Theory - is it true for humans?, published by Rishika on June 14, 2024 on LessWrong. And is it a good model for value learning in AI? TLDR Shard theory proposes a view of value formation where experiences lead to the creation of context-based 'shards' that determine behaviour. Here, we go over psychological and neuroscientific views of learning, and find that while shard theory's emphasis on context bears similarity to types of learning such as conditioning, it does not address top-down influences that may decrease the locality of value-learning in the brain. What's Shard Theory (and why do we care)? In 2022, Quintin Pope and Alex Turner posted ' The shard theory of human values', where they described their view of how experiences shape the value we place on things. They give an example of a baby who enjoys drinking juice, and eventually learns that grabbing at the juice pouch, moving around to find the juice pouch, and modelling where the juice pouch might be, are all helpful steps in order to get to its reward. 'Human values', they say, 'are not e.g. an incredibly complicated, genetically hard-coded set of drives, but rather sets of contextually activated heuristics…' And since, like humans, AI is often trained with reinforcement learning, the same might apply to AI. The original post is long (over 7,000 words) and dense, but Lawrence Chan helpfully posted a condensation of the topic in ' Shard Theory in Nine Theses: a Distillation and Critical Appraisal'. In it, he presents nine (as might be expected) main points of shard theory, ending with the last thesis: 'shard theory as a model of human values'. 'I'm personally not super well versed in neuroscience or psychology', he says, 'so I can't personally attest to [its] solidity…I'd be interested in hearing from experts in these fields on this topic.' And that's exactly what we're here to do. A Crash Course on Human Learning Types of learning What is learning? A baby comes into the world and is inundated with sensory information of all kinds. From then on, it must process this information, take whatever's useful, and store it somehow for future use. There's various places in the brain where this information is stored, and for various purposes. Looking at these various types of storage, or memory, can help us understand what's going on: 3 types of memory We often group memory types by the length of time we hold on to them - 'working memory' (while you do some task), 'short-term memory' (maybe a few days, unless you revise or are reminded), and 'long-term memory' (effectively forever). Let's take a closer look at long-term memory: Types of long-term memory We can broadly split long-term memory into 'declarative' and 'nondeclarative'. Declarative memory is stuff you can talk about (or 'declare'): what the capital of your country is, what you ate for lunch yesterday, what made you read this essay. Nondeclarative covers the rest: a grab-bag of memory types including knowing how to ride a bike, getting habituated to a scent you've been smelling all day, and being motivated to do things you were previously rewarded for (like drinking sweet juice). For most of this essay, we'll be focusing on the last type: conditioning. Types of conditioning Conditioning Sometime in the 1890s, a physiologist named Ivan Pavlov was researching salivation using dogs. He would feed the dogs with powdered meat, and insert a tube into the cheek of each dog to measure their saliva.As expected, the dogs salivated when the food was in front of them. Unexpectedly, the dogs also salivated when they heard the footsteps of his assistant (who brought them their food). Fascinated by this, Pavlov started to play a metronome whenever he gave the dogs their food. After a while, sure enough, the dogs would salivate whenever the metronome played, even if ...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Shard Theory - is it true for humans?, published by ErisApprentice on June 14, 2024 on The AI Alignment Forum. And is it a good model for value learning in AI? (Read on Substack: https://recursingreflections.substack.com/p/shard-theory-is-it-true-for-humans) TLDR Shard theory proposes a view of value formation where experiences lead to the creation of context-based 'shards' that determine behaviour. Here, we go over psychological and neuroscientific views of learning, and find that while shard theory's emphasis on context bears similarity to types of learning such as conditioning, it does not address top-down influences that may decrease the locality of value-learning in the brain. What's Shard Theory (and why do we care)? In 2022, Quintin Pope and Alex Turner posted ' The shard theory of human values', where they described their view of how experiences shape the value we place on things. They give an example of a baby who enjoys drinking juice, and eventually learns that grabbing at the juice pouch, moving around to find the juice pouch, and modelling where the juice pouch might be, are all helpful steps in order to get to its reward. 'Human values', they say, 'are not e.g. an incredibly complicated, genetically hard-coded set of drives, but rather sets of contextually activated heuristics…' And since, like humans, AI is often trained with reinforcement learning, the same might apply to AI. The original post is long (over 7,000 words) and dense, but Lawrence Chan helpfully posted a condensation of the topic in ' Shard Theory in Nine Theses: a Distillation and Critical Appraisal'. In it, he presents nine (as might be expected) main points of shard theory, ending with the last thesis: 'shard theory as a model of human values'. 'I'm personally not super well versed in neuroscience or psychology', he says, 'so I can't personally attest to [its] solidity…I'd be interested in hearing from experts in these fields on this topic.' And that's exactly what we're here to do. A Crash Course on Human Learning Types of learning What is learning? A baby comes into the world and is inundated with sensory information of all kinds. From then on, it must process this information, take whatever's useful, and store it somehow for future use. There's various places in the brain where this information is stored, and for various purposes. Looking at these various types of storage, or memory, can help us understand what's going on: 3 types of memory We often group memory types by the length of time we hold on to them - 'working memory' (while you do some task), 'short-term memory' (maybe a few days, unless you revise or are reminded), and 'long-term memory' (effectively forever). Let's take a closer look at long-term memory: Types of long-term memory We can broadly split long-term memory into 'declarative' and 'nondeclarative'. Declarative memory is stuff you can talk about (or 'declare'): what the capital of your country is, what you ate for lunch yesterday, what made you read this essay. Nondeclarative covers the rest: a grab-bag of memory types including knowing how to ride a bike, getting habituated to a scent you've been smelling all day, and being motivated to do things you were previously rewarded for (like drinking sweet juice). For most of this essay, we'll be focusing on the last type: conditioning. Types of conditioning Conditioning Sometime in the 1890s, a physiologist named Ivan Pavlov was researching salivation using dogs. He would feed the dogs with powdered meat, and insert a tube into the cheek of each dog to measure their saliva.As expected, the dogs salivated when the food was in front of them. Unexpectedly, the dogs also salivated when they heard the footsteps of his assistant (who brought them their food). Fascinated by this, Pavlov started to play a metronome whenever h...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Shard Theory - is it true for humans?, published by Rishika Bose on June 14, 2024 on The AI Alignment Forum. And is it a good model for value learning in AI? (Read on Substack: https://recursingreflections.substack.com/p/shard-theory-is-it-true-for-humans) TLDR Shard theory proposes a view of value formation where experiences lead to the creation of context-based 'shards' that determine behaviour. Here, we go over psychological and neuroscientific views of learning, and find that while shard theory's emphasis on context bears similarity to types of learning such as conditioning, it does not address top-down influences that may decrease the locality of value-learning in the brain. What's Shard Theory (and why do we care)? In 2022, Quintin Pope and Alex Turner posted ' The shard theory of human values', where they described their view of how experiences shape the value we place on things. They give an example of a baby who enjoys drinking juice, and eventually learns that grabbing at the juice pouch, moving around to find the juice pouch, and modelling where the juice pouch might be, are all helpful steps in order to get to its reward. 'Human values', they say, 'are not e.g. an incredibly complicated, genetically hard-coded set of drives, but rather sets of contextually activated heuristics…' And since, like humans, AI is often trained with reinforcement learning, the same might apply to AI. The original post is long (over 7,000 words) and dense, but Lawrence Chan helpfully posted a condensation of the topic in ' Shard Theory in Nine Theses: a Distillation and Critical Appraisal'. In it, he presents nine (as might be expected) main points of shard theory, ending with the last thesis: 'shard theory as a model of human values'. 'I'm personally not super well versed in neuroscience or psychology', he says, 'so I can't personally attest to [its] solidity…I'd be interested in hearing from experts in these fields on this topic.' And that's exactly what we're here to do. A Crash Course on Human Learning Types of learning What is learning? A baby comes into the world and is inundated with sensory information of all kinds. From then on, it must process this information, take whatever's useful, and store it somehow for future use. There's various places in the brain where this information is stored, and for various purposes. Looking at these various types of storage, or memory, can help us understand what's going on: 3 types of memory We often group memory types by the length of time we hold on to them - 'working memory' (while you do some task), 'short-term memory' (maybe a few days, unless you revise or are reminded), and 'long-term memory' (effectively forever). Let's take a closer look at long-term memory: Types of long-term memory We can broadly split long-term memory into 'declarative' and 'nondeclarative'. Declarative memory is stuff you can talk about (or 'declare'): what the capital of your country is, what you ate for lunch yesterday, what made you read this essay. Nondeclarative covers the rest: a grab-bag of memory types including knowing how to ride a bike, getting habituated to a scent you've been smelling all day, and being motivated to do things you were previously rewarded for (like drinking sweet juice). For most of this essay, we'll be focusing on the last type: conditioning. Types of conditioning Conditioning Sometime in the 1890s, a physiologist named Ivan Pavlov was researching salivation using dogs. He would feed the dogs with powdered meat, and insert a tube into the cheek of each dog to measure their saliva.As expected, the dogs salivated when the food was in front of them. Unexpectedly, the dogs also salivated when they heard the footsteps of his assistant (who brought them their food). Fascinated by this, Pavlov started to play a metronome whenever he ...

Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Shard Theory - is it true for humans?, published by Rishika on June 14, 2024 on LessWrong. And is it a good model for value learning in AI? TLDR Shard theory proposes a view of value formation where experiences lead to the creation of context-based 'shards' that determine behaviour. Here, we go over psychological and neuroscientific views of learning, and find that while shard theory's emphasis on context bears similarity to types of learning such as conditioning, it does not address top-down influences that may decrease the locality of value-learning in the brain. What's Shard Theory (and why do we care)? In 2022, Quintin Pope and Alex Turner posted ' The shard theory of human values', where they described their view of how experiences shape the value we place on things. They give an example of a baby who enjoys drinking juice, and eventually learns that grabbing at the juice pouch, moving around to find the juice pouch, and modelling where the juice pouch might be, are all helpful steps in order to get to its reward. 'Human values', they say, 'are not e.g. an incredibly complicated, genetically hard-coded set of drives, but rather sets of contextually activated heuristics…' And since, like humans, AI is often trained with reinforcement learning, the same might apply to AI. The original post is long (over 7,000 words) and dense, but Lawrence Chan helpfully posted a condensation of the topic in ' Shard Theory in Nine Theses: a Distillation and Critical Appraisal'. In it, he presents nine (as might be expected) main points of shard theory, ending with the last thesis: 'shard theory as a model of human values'. 'I'm personally not super well versed in neuroscience or psychology', he says, 'so I can't personally attest to [its] solidity…I'd be interested in hearing from experts in these fields on this topic.' And that's exactly what we're here to do. A Crash Course on Human Learning Types of learning What is learning? A baby comes into the world and is inundated with sensory information of all kinds. From then on, it must process this information, take whatever's useful, and store it somehow for future use. There's various places in the brain where this information is stored, and for various purposes. Looking at these various types of storage, or memory, can help us understand what's going on: 3 types of memory We often group memory types by the length of time we hold on to them - 'working memory' (while you do some task), 'short-term memory' (maybe a few days, unless you revise or are reminded), and 'long-term memory' (effectively forever). Let's take a closer look at long-term memory: Types of long-term memory We can broadly split long-term memory into 'declarative' and 'nondeclarative'. Declarative memory is stuff you can talk about (or 'declare'): what the capital of your country is, what you ate for lunch yesterday, what made you read this essay. Nondeclarative covers the rest: a grab-bag of memory types including knowing how to ride a bike, getting habituated to a scent you've been smelling all day, and being motivated to do things you were previously rewarded for (like drinking sweet juice). For most of this essay, we'll be focusing on the last type: conditioning. Types of conditioning Conditioning Sometime in the 1890s, a physiologist named Ivan Pavlov was researching salivation using dogs. He would feed the dogs with powdered meat, and insert a tube into the cheek of each dog to measure their saliva.As expected, the dogs salivated when the food was in front of them. Unexpectedly, the dogs also salivated when they heard the footsteps of his assistant (who brought them their food). Fascinated by this, Pavlov started to play a metronome whenever he gave the dogs their food. After a while, sure enough, the dogs would salivate whenever the metronome played, even if ...

The Science of Likability: 60 Evidence-Based Methods to Radiate Charisma, Make a Powerful Impression, Win Friends, and Trigger Attraction By Patrick King.00:02:19 Context-Dependent Memories.00:10:07 The Power of Association.00:15:36 Shut Up and Let 'Em Talk!00:26:10 Equity Within Relationships.00:32:04 Similarity Breeds Liking.00:38:05 This is known as the chameleon effect00:40:09 Three Stages of Friendship Hear it Here - https://bit.ly/likability-promohttps://www.amazon.com/dp/B07VCRTJ59100% scientifically-proven ways to make friends quickly, turn enemies into friends, gain trust, and be flat-out likable.Utilize the most interesting, shocking, and counterintuitive findings in psychological science to simply make people want to be around you.The Science of Likability takes over 60 seminal scientific and psychological studies and breaks them down into real, usable guidelines and tips to create the presence you have always wanted. Every piece of advice in this book to increase your social standing and likability factor is 100% backed by in-depth, peer-reviewed research, and it goes far beyond simple common sense and intuition.Learn how to subconsciously make yourself likable, trustworthy, and intelligent.You can get a new haircut and wardrobe, and you even learn knock-knock jokes. But likability is something more. It's subconscious, and it's about the small signs that signal our brains to let their guards down, seek others out, and embrace them. We know what to do if we want to make someone hate us - we now also know what to do to become someone's favorite person.Understand what makes people tick, and strategically give it to them.There are seminal studies from (in)famous researchers such as Sigmund Freud, Ivan Pavlov, Stanley Schachter, and Daniel Goleman, but also the most up-to-date discoveries from 2019 - all insightful, analytical, sometimes surprising, but most importantly effective and actionable. Pair that with the insight and human intelligence factor of bestselling author and social skills coach Patrick King, and you have a guide that can be read equally for education as for helpful, real advice. Patrick's writing draws of a variety of sources, from scientific research, academic experience, coaching, and real life experience. Discover:- How to take advantage of people's memories for your sense of charm.- The power of equity in relationships and friendships.- A literal formula for "friendship chemistry."- The real way to use eye contact to build trust.- Why tripping and being vulnerable in front of people is positive.- Universal definitions of charisma, wit, and humor - seriously. Universal.Being likable unlocks the doors to everything you want in life.A better career? You better believe that the people with the most promotions and highest salaries aren't just the most qualified. Better love life? Being likable makes you a potential love interest to anyone you want. Better relationships and friendships? Not only that, but you open the door to people wanting to be friends with you. Likability is the hidden force that makes people appear to be lucky in life and receive more opportunities than they know what to do with. Likability drives us forward, not intelligence or luck.Ultimately, this is a social skills and charisma book to drastically change your presence. Pick up your copy today by clicking the BUY NOW button at the top of this page.This is the first book in the “The Psychology of Social Dynamics” series as listed below:1.The Science of Likability: 60 Evidence-Based Methods to Radiate Charisma, Make a Powerful Impression, Win Friends, and Trigger Attraction [2019 Edition]2.Think Like a Psychologist: How to Analyze Emotions, Read Body Language and Behavior,...

In this episode, I want to share a quick continuation of what changed in January of 2024 and how I decided to stop writing my gratitude and feel it.  Sounds woo-woo doesn't it, yet it has been a huge shift for me and I knew I was being called to share it with you.  In this episode, we discuss:  1) Focusing on your gratitude is more than checking a box, doing the thing, and “saying you are committed to your personal growth.”  If you are only concerned with checking a box, then you are in the process of doing more and not experiencing it. 2) A tool we learn in NLP is called anchoring, and this is a method of anchoring in emotions.  Much like we anchor in triggers and stressors, we can also anchor in the positive, higher vibration emotions too. Anchoring allows you to feel any state or emotion any time you want, it is anchored in the work of Ivan Pavlov. The best states to anchor are naturally occurring states, vivid and highly associated states. 3) January was such an incredible month that we anchored it in with a trip at the end of the month to Toronto and it was about so much more than buying a hat, thank you Lillyput Hats!    OUTSPOKEN Self-belief audio bundle https://www.marshavanw.com/offers/pApGMinw   Marsha Vanwynsberghe — NLP Storytelling Trainer, Author, Speaker, and Podcaster Marsha is the 6-time Bestselling Author of “When She Stopped Asking Why”.  She shares her lessons as a parent who dealt with teen substance abuse that tore her family unit apart. Marsha has been published 7xs, most recently with her co-platform, Every Body Holds A Story, and she is on a mission to continue to help women and men to speak, share, and publish their stories.  Through her tools, OUTSPOKEN NLP certification, programs, coaching, and podcast, Marsha teaches the power of Radical Responsibility and Owning Your Choices in your own life.  She empowers people to heal and own their stories, be conscious leaders, and build platform businesses that create massive impact.  

In light of the Spooky Season, Nick and Robyn discuss horrible Psych experiments that press ethical boundaries. The First Episode of this two part series. Nick discusses the trauma and harm of a baby known as Little Albert as the experimenters try and condition this baby like Ivan Pavlov did to a dog. This Horrible and Horrifying experiment eventually was deemed unethical as it should have been.

Klasik koşullanma (veya tepkisel koşullanma), bilinçsiz veya otomatik olarak gerçekleşen bir öğrenme türüdür. Klasik koşullanma, doğal uyarıcılara verilen doğal bir tepkinin, yapay bir uyarıcı tarafından da uyarılır hale getirilmesini ifade eder. Rus fizyolog Ivan Pavlov tarafından keşfedildiği için… Seslendiren: Selçuk Kandemir

Jika kamu merasakan perasaan nggak nyaman ketika public speaking, presentasi atau berbicara dengan orang baru. Tenang kamu nggak sendirian kok. Perasaan nggak nyaman, cemas, bahkan sejumlah reaksi psikosomatis seperti keringat dingin, gemetar sampai mulas adalah respon tubuh dalam menanggapi suatu perubahan yang seringkali tidak di inginkan. Nah, terdapat satu teknik yang di sebut sebagai “achoring” atau menjangkar emosi positif dari masa lalu dan memanfaatkannya untuk kepercayaan diri di masa kini. Teknik ini bersumber dari eksperimen seorang dokter asal Rusia, Ivan Pavlov yang juga terkenal dalam psikologi perilaku. Yuk simak dan praktikan tekniknya, siapa tahu bermanfaat untuk kamu.. Download Ebook GRATIS "Healing with Meaning" disini ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠FREE EBOOK⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ikutan Belajar Psikologi mulai dari 19ribuan disini : ⁠⁠⁠bit.ly/kelas-psikologi⁠ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/psikologid/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/psikologid/support

This ep I chat to artist and wonderful soul, Chile Bainbridge (@sweetchilesauced). Chile is v special and you'll understand why. Chile shares insight on their journey with gender identity and how community, representation and ties (jazzed up ones tho) created an environment to grow. Then.. hold on to your hats as we learn about Chile's secret obsession that will have Ivan Pavlov himself cheering from the grave.. Move over doggos, Pavlov's pussy is now in.

In today's episode, we discuss vocational virtues⸺scientific principles that should guide the behavior of scientists. We discuss whether we agree with values put forth by numerous scientists, including Ivan Pavlov, Peter Medawar, Santiago Ramón y Cajal, Barry Schwartz, among others, and share our own.    Correction: At 56:24, Smriti mentions the book This is Biology, which is written by Ernst Mayr, not E.O. Wilson.    Shownotes Pavlov, I. (1936). Bequest of Pavlov to the Academic Youth of His Country. Science, 83(2155), 369–370. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.83.2155.369 Schwartz, B. (2022). Science, scholarship, and intellectual virtues: A guide to what higher education should be like. Journal of Moral Education, 51(1), 61-72. Robert T. Pennock: An Instinct for Truth: Curiosity and the Moral Character of Science Merton, R. K. (1942). A Note on Science and Democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. Schwartz, B. (1990). The creation and destruction of value. American Psychologist, 45(1), 7. Paul Medawar: Advice to a Young Scientist  Ernst Mayr. This is Biology Santiago Ramón y Cajal: Advice for a Young Investigator Bernal, J. D. (1939). The Social Function Of Science. Routledge.  Weber, M. (1917/1958). Science as a Vocation. Daedalus, 87(1), 111–134. E.O. Wilson: Letters to a Young Scientist

5.02 Classical and Operant Conditioning Psychiatry review for the USMLE Step 1 Exam Classical Conditioning: Pavlovian conditioning discovered by Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known for his experiments with dogs. Learning through association. Example: Conditioning dogs to respond to a noise the way they would respond to meat. Involves associating an unconditioned stimulus with a new conditioned stimulus to elicit the same response. Process of Classical Conditioning: Start with a stimulus that produces a response (e.g., smelling pizza makes you hungry). Pair the stimulus and response with an unconditioned stimulus (e.g., receiving a text indicating pizza delivery). Eventually, the conditioned stimulus (the text notification) alone elicits the conditioned response (mouth watering). Extinction and Spontaneous Recovery in Classical Conditioning: If the conditioned stimulus (text notification) is presented without the unconditioned stimulus (pizza), the conditioned response (mouth watering) will weaken and eventually extinguish. Spontaneous recovery may occur, where the conditioned behavior briefly reappears after a period of extinction. Terms in Classical Conditioning: Unconditioned stimulus (US): Triggers a response unconditionally. Unconditioned response (UR): The response elicited by the unconditioned stimulus. Conditioned stimulus (CS): Initially neutral stimulus that becomes associated with the unconditioned stimulus. Conditioned response (CR): The response elicited by the conditioned stimulus. Operant Conditioning: Developed by B.F. Skinner. Learning occurs through rewards and punishments for behavior. Three types of responses: neutral operants, reinforcers, and punishers. Examples of Operant Conditioning: Positive reinforcement: Giving a child candy for good behavior. Negative reinforcement: Taking away a child's phone until homework is done to increase desired behavior. Positive punishment: Using physical force as punishment (not recommended). Negative punishment: Taking away a child's phone to decrease unwanted behavior. Different Schedules of Reinforcement: Continuous Reinforcement: Positive reinforcement every time a specific behavior occurs. Fixed Ratio Reinforcement: Reinforcement after a specified number of correct responses. Fixed Interval Reinforcement: Reinforcement after a fixed time interval with at least one correct response. Variable Ratio Reinforcement: Reinforcement after an unpredictable number of responses. Variable Interval Reinforcement: Reinforcement after an unpredictable amount of time. Summary: Classical conditioning involves learning through association of stimuli. Operant conditioning involves learning through rewards and punishments for behavior.

From Nobel winners to great innovators, Dan Saladino explores the history of prize-winning food ideas that changed the world, including researchers who uncovered the secrets of our stomachs to the plant breeds transforming the future of wheat. Nominations are now open for this year's BBC Food and Farming Awards until June 19th, including Best Innovation which was created to celebrate ideas that will make food production better for us and for the planet. For more than a century, and around the world, ground-breaking ideas linked to food have featured in awards and prizes, from Ivan Pavlov's research on our digestive system through to Norman Borlaug's efforts to increase food production with crop breeding in the 1960s. Both received a Nobel Prize. In more recent years awards have been created to find solutions to some of the biggest challenges we face in food and farming. The former chef of the Swedish restaurant Faviken, Magnus Nilsson now oversees the Food Planet Prize, the world's biggest environmental prize. He tells Dan about previous winners who have created solutions to plastics in our oceans and the problem of abandoned fishing equipment, so called 'ghost nets' and also a project in Africa providing refrigeration to farmers which is resulting in a dramatic reduction in food waste. Another award winner in the programme is Heidi Kuhn, founder of Roots of Peace. This year she was recognised by the US based World Food Prize for decades of work helping to clear mines from regions impacted by conflict and return the land to food production. Produced and presented by Dan Saladino.

never sniff glue! / the compelling, confronting, fascinating birth to death time-lapse diorama / we have to shift our perception in order to understand what we are doing here / the most amazing thing in the universe - we think we won't die / “Don't become a mere recorder of facts, but try to penetrate the mystery of their origin." - Ivan Pavlov / when we dissociate anything from it's origin we are in illusion / yogis see everything in it's relation to Krishna / the discovery of Brahma Samhita Ch. 5 / don't bust into the Grantha Samadhi / the beautiful sages - 6 Goswamis of Vrindavan / Kaustubha's Vrindavan pilgrimage / preparing the mind for Vrindavan / understanding Krishna is the master key

never sniff glue! / the compelling, confronting, fascinating birth to death time-lapse diorama / we have to shift our perception in order to understand what we are doing here / the most amazing thing in the universe - we think we won't die / “Don't become a mere recorder of facts, but try to penetrate the mystery of their origin." - Ivan Pavlov / when we dissociate anything from it's origin we are in illusion / yogis see everything in it's relation to Krishna / the discovery of Brahma Samhita Ch. 5 / don't bust into the Grantha Samadhi / the beautiful sages - 6 Goswamis of Vrindavan / Kaustubha's Vrindavan pilgrimage / preparing the mind for Vrindavan / understanding Krishna is the master key

Russia's security service arrested an American reporter for The Wall Street Journal on espionage charges, the first time a US correspondent has been detained on spying accusations since the Cold War. The newspaper denied the allegations and demanded his release. Evan Gershkovich was detained in the city of Yekaterinburg while allegedly trying to obtain classified information, the Federal Security Service, known by the acronym FSB, said Thursday. Daniil Berman, the lawyer of arrested Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, speaks to journalists near the Lefortovsky court, in Moscow. Photo / Alexander Zemlianichenko, AP The service, which is the top domestic security agency and main successor to the Soviet-era KGB, alleged that Gershkovich “was acting on instructions from the American side to collect information about the activities of one of the enterprises of the Russian military-industrial complex that constitutes a state secret”. The Journal “vehemently denies the allegations from the FSB and seeks the immediate release of our trusted and dedicated reporter, Evan Gershkovich”. the newspaper said. “We stand in solidarity with Evan and his family.” The arrest comes at a moment of bitter tensions between the West and Moscow over its war in Ukraine and as the Kremlin intensifies a crackdown on opposition activists, independent journalists and civil society groups. The sweeping campaign of repression is unprecedented since the Soviet era. Activists say it often means the very profession of journalism is criminalised, along with the activities of ordinary Russians who oppose the war. Reporter for the Wall Street Journal Evan Gershkovich (centre), is escorted by officers from the Lefortovsky court. Photo / AP Earlier this week, a Russian court convicted a father over social media posts critical of the war and sentenced him to two years in prison. His 13-year-old daughter was sent to an orphanage. Gershkovich is the first American reporter to be arrested on espionage charges in Russia since September 1986, when Nicholas Daniloff, a Moscow correspondent for US News and World Report, was arrested by the KGB. Daniloff was released without charge 20 days later in a swap for an employee of the Soviet Union's United Nations mission who was arrested by the FBI, also on spying charges. At a hearing Thursday, a Moscow court quickly ruled that Gershkovich would be kept behind bars pending the investigation. While previous American detainees have been freed in prisoner swaps, a top Russian official said it was too early to talk about any such deal. In Washington, the Biden administration said it had spoken with the Journal and Gershkovich's family. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre condemned the arrest “in the strongest terms” and urged Americans to heed government warnings not to travel to Russia. An entrance of the Lefortovo prison, in Moscow, Russia, where Evan Gershkovich has been taken on espionage charges. Photo / AP The State Department was in direct touch with the Russian government and seeking access to Gershkovich, Jean-Pierre said. Gershkovich, who covers Russia, Ukraine and other ex-Soviet nations as a correspondent in the Journal's Moscow bureau, could face up to 20 years in prison if convicted of espionage. Prominent lawyers noted that past investigations into espionage cases took a year to 18 months, during which time he may have little contact with the outside world. The FSB noted that Gershkovich had accreditation from the Russian Foreign Ministry to work as a journalist, but ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova alleged that Gershkovich was using his credentials as cover for “activities that have nothing to do with journalism”. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters: “It is not about a suspicion, it is about the fact that he was caught red-handed.” Gershkovich speaks fluent Russian and had previously worked for the French news agency Agence France-Presse and The New York Times. He was a 2014 graduate of Bowdoin College in Maine, where he was a philosophy major who cooperated with local papers and championed a free press, according to Clayton Rose, the college's president. His last report from Moscow, published earlier this week, focused on the Russian economy's slowdown amid Western sanctions imposed after Russian troops invaded Ukraine last year. Ivan Pavlov, a prominent Russian defence attorney who has worked on many espionage and treason cases, said Gershkovich's case is the first criminal espionage charge against a foreign journalist in post-Soviet Russia. “That unwritten rule not to touch accredited foreign journalists, has stopped working,” said Pavlov, a member of the First Department legal aid group. Pavlov said the case against Gershkovich was built to give Russia “trump cards” for a future prisoner exchange and will likely be resolved “not by the means of the law, but by political, diplomatic means”. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov ruled out any quick swap. “I wouldn't even consider this issue now because people who were previously swapped had already served their sentences,” Ryabkov said, according to Russian news agencies. In December, WNBA star Brittney Griner was freed after 10 months behind bars in exchange for Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout. Another American, Paul Whelan, a Michigan corporate security executive, has been imprisoned in Russia since December 2018 on espionage charges that his family and the US government have said are baseless. “Our family is sorry to hear that another American family will have to experience the same trauma that we have had to endure for the past 1553 days,” Whelan's brother David said in an emailed statement. “It sounds as though the frame-up of Mr Gershkovich was the same as it was in Paul's case.” Jeanne Cavelier, of the press freedom group Reporters Without Borders, said Gershkovich's arrest “looks like a retaliation measure of Russia against the United States”. “We are very alarmed because it is probably a way to intimidate all Western journalists that are trying to investigate aspects of the war on the ground in Russia,” said Cavelier, head of Eastern Europe and Central Asia desk at the Paris-based group. Russian journalist Dmitry Kolezev said on Telegram that he spoke to Gershkovich before his trip to the Ural Mountain city of Yekaterinburg, Russia's fourth-largest, about 1670km east of Moscow. “He was preparing for the usual, albeit rather dangerous in current conditions, journalist work,” Kolezev wrote. Another prominent lawyer with the First Department group, Yevgeny Smirnov, said that those arrested on espionage and treason charges are usually held at the FSB's Lefortovo prison, where they are usually placed in total isolation, without phone calls, visitors or even access to newspapers. At most, they can receive letters, often delayed by weeks. Smirnov called these conditions “tools of suppression”. Smirnov and Pavlov both said that any trial would be held behind closed doors. According to Pavlov, there have been no acquittals in treason and espionage cases in Russia since 1999.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Burrhus Frederic Skinner (March 20, 1904 – August 18, 1990) was an American psychologist, behaviorist, author, inventor, and social philosopher. Considered the father of Behaviorism, he was the Edgar Pierce Professor of Psychology at Harvard University from 1958 until his retirement in 1974. Considering free will to be an illusion, Skinner saw human action as dependent on consequences of previous actions, a theory he would articulate as the principle of reinforcement: If the consequences to an action are bad, there is a high chance the action will not be repeated; if the consequences are good, the probability of the action being repeated becomes stronger. Skinner developed behavior analysis, especially the philosophy of radical behaviorism, and founded the experimental analysis of behavior, a school of experimental research psychology. He also used operant conditioning to strengthen behavior, considering the rate of response to be the most effective measure of response strength. To study operant conditioning, he invented the operant conditioning chamber (aka the Skinner box), and to measure rate he invented the cumulative recorder. Using these tools, he and Charles Ferster produced Skinner's most influential experimental work, outlined in their 1957 book Schedules of Reinforcement. Skinner was a prolific author, publishing 21 books and 180 articles. He imagined the application of his ideas to the design of a human community in his 1948 utopian novel, Walden Two, while his analysis of human behavior culminated in his 1958 work, Verbal Behavior. Skinner, John B. Watson and Ivan Pavlov, are considered to be the pioneers of modern behaviorism. Accordingly, a June 2002 survey listed Skinner as the most influential psychologist of the 20th century. Original video ⁠here⁠⁠ and here Full Wikipedia entry ⁠here⁠ B. F. Skinner's books ⁠here --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

EMP Episode 14 Today's show was inspired by the recent academic studies showing the damaging psychological impact of social media on children. And that it is a smoking gun alerting us to something being deeply wrong and indeed is the tip of an iceberg that has been forming for a very long time. And so today, also inspired by friends and hosts in radio, I am calling it out and will attempt to explain in plain terms what this is how it's come about and why it matters to all of us. Follow here: Telegram Channel - https://t.me/+b6GFW6GFlctiZjQ8 Discord Server - https://discord.gg/5MWSfpcf Twitter Feed - https://twitter.com/exiled_minds Wisdom.audio - https://wisdom.app/exiled_minds Links: https://futurism.com/neoscope/scientists-brain-scans-kids-social-media https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violet_ray https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachistoscope https://www.historicmysteries.com/the-philadelphia-experiment/ https://psychology.fas.harvard.edu/people/b-f-skinner LONGINES CHRONOSCOPE WITH RICHARD E. BYRD National Archives and Records Administration - ARC 95934, LI LW-LW361 https://youtu.be/PrdSal9uH28 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Rife https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/247/ https://rife.org https://mysteriesrunsolved.com/2021/01/the-montauk-project.html https://www.thomastownsendbrown.com https://www.monroeinstitute.org https://www.sri.com - https://www.history.com/topics/us-government/history-of-mk-ultra https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ https://youtu.be/cTtIPBPSv0U Support: Cash App: £Rohanno6 Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=TCTV8RJFRKMBL Friends of Exiled Minds: Apocalypse Tao https://open.spotify.com/show/6xpNQgfyITF51Mp6eQy9D9 Algo Rhythm https://www.youtube.com/c/AlgoRhythmmike Ash, The Reptillian from Mars https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo4fQ_AOlBTOOHNyFSoI-ew Jennifer Hawkins https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdXA9TJW5fE3d9fK0lAcN9g Salsido Paranormal https://salsidoparanormal.podbean.com The Nightstocker https://www.twitch.tv/beyondthestrange Troubled Minds Radio https://troubledminds.org --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/liam-martin31/message

Join Red Pill Revolution for an explosive episode as we dive deep into the truth behind the headlines and expose the lies and manipulation of mainstream media. Covering the most controversial and talked-about topics of the week, including Alec Baldwin's charges of involuntary manslaughter, Greta Thunberg's arrest, a controversy surrounding an NHL hockey player under fire for refusing to wear a lgbtq+ jersey, a feud between conservative entertainers Stephen crowder and the daily wire, and finally Jamie Lee Curtis's disturbing art display. Get ready for a wild ride.   Subscribe and leave a 5-star review! ----more---- Donate to support the show by going to https://givesendgo.com/redpillrevolution   Our website https://redpillrevolution.co/    Podcast Companion: https://redpillrevolution.substack.com   ----more---- Full Transcription    Welcome to the Revolution.  Hello and welcome to Red Pill Revolution, my name is Austin Adams, and today we have a jam packed episode for you guys covering the wildest and most controversial topics of the last week. First. We gotta get this one outta the way cuz it's kind of a big one.  is discussing Alec Baldwin's recent charge of involuntary manslaughter in the tragic, horrific death of Helena Hutchins. If you could recall on the set of Russ, we'll be diving into all the details of that case and examining his role in the absolutely preventable tragedy that occurred. After that, we will be discussing the recent arrest of teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg will be exposing the truth behind her recent so-called arrest and examining her role in the larger globalist agenda. We'll also be discussing the recent controversies surrounding Philadelphia Flyers defenseman Ivan Prove. And his decision to sit out during a warmup skate that involved wearing a gay pride themed hockey jersey. And, uh, he did so due to his religious beliefs and he got interviewed and it was, it was pretty interesting.   We'll also be discussing stephen Crowder, I'm sure you have heard of him, as well as the Daily Wire, ran by uh, Ben Shapiro. Um, basically incentivizing their creators to walk the line of big tech censorship in order to maintain their contracted. Which is obviously concerning if you're somebody who is interested in following influencers who are also interested in freedom of speech, right? I if you don't, if, if you have to be weary of speaking your actual opinion when you're one of these little single largest influencers in the space and you have to follow the guidelines of YouTube or fear getting doctor pay.  That's an issue, right? So, so we'll discuss that. We'll see. I, I have some differing opinions on the, the matter. I have some differing opinions on who was right, who was wrong. I don't think it's a clear cut answer but I will discuss where I think Stephen Crowder went wrong, where I think the Daily wire is going wrong, and talk about some of the interviews that I listened to surrounding this. Uh, Candace Owen spoke out about this. Basically, every single person from the Daily Wire spoke out about this, and Stephen Crowder has just been. Off on social media about it. So we'll talk about that. And then finally we'll be discussing the recent controversy surrounding actress Jamie Lee Curtis, and her display of a unbelievably disturbing piece of art that she posted that was in the background of a picture she posted on Instagram, which was showing a dead child inside of a suitcase hanging from the wall. In her office   it's just so, so disturbing to me how consistently this is coming up, right? How, how often we're seeing these depictions popping up in these wildly successful people's, uh, backgrounds and in their houses, and, you know, we'll talk about all of it. Welcome to Red Pill Revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red Pill Revolution started out with me, realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoonfed as a child. Religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it. Everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power. Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the Revolution.   All right, to everyone's surprise, finally. Alec Baldwin is facing justice for his role in the tragic and preventable death of Helena Hutchins on the set of his movie. Rust. Prosecutors have actually announced that Baldwin will be charged with involuntary manslaughter and absolutely rightfully so. Recent findings show that Baldwin. Ammunition, live ammunition that was found on the set, mixed with fake ones, uh, with empty rounds. And then the rest of the film crew, basically they, what they found was to have a. Extremely consistent pattern of criminal disregard for safety, which resulted in the death of Hutchins. Now, Baldwin's not the only one who's actually being tried here and has been charged with these things. The armorer onset has also been charged, but we'll get to that in just a minute. The maximum punishment that Alec Baldwin can get out of this is five years. That's the maximum punish. And on, you know, obviously even if he gets the maximum punishment, he's gonna serve two years at some BS celebrity prison where he gets to have his cell phone and watch TV all day. Like it's, it's terrible to think that that is what they're going to give him is the maximum of five years. He literally shh, pointed a weapon on set without checking it, without any proper regard for the safety of firearm. And pulled the trigger, pointing it directly at this woman, which resulted in her death. That's willful negligence.  So the fact that five years is all they're talking about at this point is disgusting to me, and it only shows that if somebody else was, in this case, if there was a be like a, a, a, a bunch of buddies filming a, a. Documentary together, and as a result, one got shot and killed on set. You bet your ass if they're not Alec Baldwin, they're getting more serious charges than this. Absolutely positive. They're getting more serious charges in this. And the only reason that this is happening this way is because it's a mainstream set of a movie and it's Alec Baldwin, right?  I hope for the family of, of Helena Hutchins that, you know, he actually gets convicted of this, which will be, you know, kind of a stretch given how much money is gonna go behind his legal defense. But along with Alec Baldwin, the film's Armorer who is in charge of weapons on the side, Hannah Guterres Reid will also face two counts of involuntary manslaughter. According to New Mexico First Judicial District Attorney Mary Carmack Al. I think that's how you pronounce her name, Altaz. A L T W I E S. Okay. The first assistant director, David Halls, has also been charged with neglect, with negligent use of a deadly weapon, which is likely to lead to six months of probation. This also goes to show that basically the entire crew had some way, shape, or form involvement in this, and then there is so many steps that should have been taken to where this should have been prevented. Right. There's no reason at all that this should have. But the person who pulled the trigger has a maximum potential sentence of five years now. Baldwin's attorney Luke Nikas, has released a statement claiming that his decision distorts Helena HUD's tragic death and represents a terrible miscarriage of justice, according to them right bs. But let's be real. The only miscarriage of justice here is that Baldwin will face only five. . Right? That's the, literally the only, the only thing that's wrong about this, uh, the only thing that's wrong about the judicial system in this case is not that they're trying Alec Baldwin, it's that they're only going to give him five years when he murdered this woman, a wife, right? Somebody who has loved ones waiting at home for them every single day. And this man's going to get five years and she gets  put six feet in the. Now, Baldwin's attorney claims that Baldwin had no reason to believe that there was a live bullet in the gun, but obviously that's no excuse for not checking when you're the one actually pulling the trigger. Right? Baldwin relied on the professionals with whom he worked with, is what the, the quote says here. Um, but at the end of the day, he's the one pulling the trigger. He's the one with the weapon. He's the one who is pointing it in her direction and fir. Anybody, anybody with any sort of firearms experience or firearms training, and you bet your ass that you should go through firearms training. If you're constantly holding weapons in all of these films would've checked that weapon would've had, at the very least. At the very least, been there when it was loaded. Right. And, and, and, and the bigger question here is why was there any live ammunition on the set to. What was the purpose of that? Why would there be any reason for there to be live ammunition on the set? No reason. No reason at all that that should have been the case.  Involuntary manslaughter is a fourth degree felony and is normally punishable by up to 18 months behind bars and a $5,000 fine, but a firearm enhancement. Now that would've been terrible, obviously if you just got 18 months, but because of a firearm enhancement on the charges, it could make the crime punishable by a mandatory sentence of five years in jail. Now, mandatory is a nice thing to hear there, right? This is the least that he obviously deserves for doing. Uh, Helena Hutchins family actually came out in support of this. They said that they support them actively engaging in going after him for these charges  five years is, is a slap on the wrist. Now, if you recall, like, I don't know, it was a, on the one year anniversary of him shooting her like as if there should be any anniversary there, Alec Baldwin posted on social media and commented, like had the caption that said one year ago today with a picture of her face super. Like almost like it was like her birthday or something like one year ago. Today I married my wife. No. One year ago. Today you shot a woman and killed her in front of you. Could you imagine being on this set? Could you imagine watching this gun go off and this woman die in front of you while on a movie set? How tragic for everybody on the set to have to have witnessed that and he's sitting here posting on Instagram as if it was. Birthday party or something like one year ago today, and then said nothing about it. He got roasted, absolutely roasted  in the comments for posting that, uh, but he stuck to his guns on it. He's, he's, uh, just a weird, weird character. Weird character, I don't see how they don't convict him for this with everything that's happened here. And again, like I said, just to set an example here, just to set an example, right? Make sure that everybody involved from now on, I don't know, maybe check the ammunition before you fire it as somebody on the film crew.    The next thing we're gonna discuss here is going to. To the surprise of absolutely nobody, Greta Thornberg pretended to be arrested during a protest against the expansion of a coal mine in Germany. As many of you already know, a video of the incident surfaced recently went like crazy on social media. I know I saw all over Twitter on almost every single post where Greta went on there. You know, boasted about how she was there and how the police came. And, uh, all of these news networks came in and were like, Greta Thornberg, arrested. Greta Thornberg arrested. And then , the very first comment on every single one of the news channels was the video of her. And if you haven't seen the video, you gotta go watch. It was a video of her while these two cops were around her holding her there for pictures, like as if this was a, a, a meet and. and then there's all these pictures that go around of her being like held like she's a seven year old child by her parents playing, you know, when you would like get thrown around, like sitting there with this smug little smirk on her mouth. She knew what she was doing, so did her team. Right. She knew where they were going. It's, it's no coincidence that there was an entire media team there to capture this. At some random rally in Germany. Right? Yeah. Probably not a coincidence. Right. Let's, and, and this is the thing about Greta Thornberg. She's not some innocent little child, right? Who wants to save the world. No, she, she's a pawn. She's a pawn being used by a larger global agenda by, by mainstream news corporations, by people like the World Economic Forum elites, all of those major conglomerates out there that are using her as a face and this recently, this recent arrest is just literally just another example of her and her, you know, social media teams and, and, and videographers manipulation for their own gain. Right? Attention, attention, attention. Right. And there's probably no coincidence that it happened while the World Economic Forum meeting was actually going on. So anyways, in, in the video. Greta's participating in like what it says they call a sit-in right before being pulled away from police. But what's even crazier is the fact that later she's seen when she's being, like all these pictures came out of her being pulled by the police and then she's seen smiling and posing for, for the photographers while being held by the police officers. And then one of the police officers actually looks at her and goes, I didn't know you were famous. Can I get a selfie? Hm. Yeah, she wasn't getting arrested. She was taking another five minutes of fame to put on Twitter. Just like her, her back and forth banter with, with Andrew Tate. Right. And, and let's not forget here that the police actually came out and stated that Thornberg was not formally arrested and was just taken to a police fan and they had to take her ID and get her contact information. She was not. , right? She wasn't put in cuffs and thrown in the German jail.  Like I said, seems a little bit too convenient to me that you have how many, how many random col, like how many like rallies are there on a daily basis and how many times are there there unbelievable amounts of media coverage. Sit-in with 50 people at it right now. There was a video that went around of like these cops sprinting from one side of the other and just like mowing over some of these protestors. And then later they're taking selfies with Greta. Right? Like why? Why didn't they like tackle her like an outside linebacker like that? That's the video we wanted to see, but the video that we got was probably even better because it. Showing you a peak behind the curtain of what's actually going on here right now. Maybe the police weren't in. . Right. But there was enough, there was enough evidence here to show that, that they at least partook and were not, had, had not had any intention. And the mainstream media came out and ran with it. Right. Every tweet from every mainstream media company was talking about how she got arrested. No, she did not. She took a photo with cops, with, and, and got carried in the mud like a, like a little baby. So stupid and so. You see that and, and this is almost everything she's done, has been a publicity stunt, right? All of her speeches are written for her. All of her back and forth banter on Twitter is ran by a PR team. All of these things that she's doing is not by her own free will. She has a team behind her that is pushing her. And if you wanna know who's probably behind that team, rewind and listen to what I just talked about with the World Economic Forum and all of these political and business elites going, coming out and talking about how we should be eating bug. During the World Economic Forum meeting last week, right. It's, it's very, very evident that Greta Thornberg is playing a game and they're using the media to their advantage to. Keep this conversation going, right? They're using a literal child who, on her own Twitter page claims to be autistic. Like maybe, maybe not the, the forefront, you know, intellectual leader that we're looking for on, on the, the science behind potential changing of our global atmosphere and rising tides. like what is her, what is her actual, like, what are her credentials Did. Is she a scientist? There's literally no credentials that Greta Thornberg has to actually be in the, the position. And I say Thornberg because that's her damn name in whatever part of the, the metaverse that I come from because it was never Thunberg until the last two weeks. I promise you, I talked about this with Andrew TA thing. I know 100% it is the Bernstein Bears and it is gre. Thornberg, 100%. I am from the universe where it is. Thornberg, not Thunberg. Thunberg. How stupid. Anyways. Now we know. Right now we know 100% we see through all of the lies in the manipulation, right? This is not about saving the planet. This is about control and power. This is about raising the conversation of the World Economic Forum elites. This is about you stopping eating meat and starting to eat bugs. This is about you changing your vehicle from a vehicle that you can get gas and put it into the vehicle and drive wherever the hell you want, and changing that into an electric vehicle that they can turn off at a moment's. They don't want you driving a 1990 Jeep Wrangler. They want you driving a Tesla because they can press a button and now you have no transportation because you said something they didn't like on Twitter. This is about social credit scores, right? This is about your personal carbon footprint and obviously this publicity stunt. Was all in an effort to put her name back in the news after the injured Tate thing within a week or two. Like you think it's any coincidence that she's back in the news a week and a two later, right? Of course not. You think it's any coincidence that there happened to be a ton of journalists there waiting to take pictures and photos and videos of her Only at the right times? Besides the one angle that we got where we actually saw that it was a photo op, right? Like. Crazy. Crazy. All right. The next thing we're gonna discuss after this is going to be Jamie Lee Curtis, and her creepy, weird little art that she had on her wall. But before I do that, what I need you to do is go ahead and hit that subscribe button. All right. Leave a five star review. There's very few things that you can do in your day to get some positive karma and help a brother out, right? You're listening. You've been listening for 20 minutes now and obviously you're still here, so I would appreciate it if you are listening for the first time. If you have not subscribed yet, go ahead and hit that subscribe button. The next thing I need you to do is go over and leave a five star. All right. Now, I don't have the Daily Wire coming on here and paying me to do this. I'm just asking you to subscribe and leave a review. All right. The next thing I need you to do is go to red pill revolution.subs.com and sign up for the co podcast companion. Every single week, I put all of the articles, all of the links, all the videos, all the topics, the video podcasts, the audio podcasts, all of it directly to your email. And all you gotta do is go to red pill revolution.co or go directly to red pill revolution.ck.com and subscribe. Okay? It doesn't cost you anything. If you would like to become a paid subscriber, you can do so at the very bottom, and then I think it's like seven. . All right. And I and my family would appreciate it if you like what I'm doing here. Okay, so Subst. And I'm going to start bee putting, I'm going to start be Pudding. I'm going to start putting out some consistent articles and blog posts on the website. So make sure you check out Red pill revolution.co.com is for losers and I will see you there with all of the awesome new content that I'm going to be putting up there consistently. Uh, I think you guys are gonna be, uh, pretty happy with it all. Red pill revolution.dot com or red pill revolution dot c o. Alright, now the next thing is going to be that Jamie Lee Curtis has been caught with a unbelievably disturbing piece of art on her wall depicting a dead child in a suit. Hanging from a canvas in her office in a post on Instagram that was just in the background that she obviously did not realize that she had posted until a bunch of people commented on it, screenshotted it, and then she deleted it immediately. That is right, folks. The Freaky Friday mom is a bit more freaky than we originally Anticip. The art piece in question appears to be a child contorted, like a naked child contorted who looks to be dead or sleeping stuffed inside of a suitcase. Hmm. Makes you wonder a little bit if Jamie Lee Curtis has the same interior decorator as Tony Podesta and Jeffrey Epstein, because if you go look back at some of the photos that they had, it was just as. Right Now, my question around all of this is, who the hell are these artists? How much did this woman pay for this piece of disturbing art? And why do these artists think that people wanna purchase this in the first place, especially at a high price tag to somebody like Jamie Lee Curtis or Tony Podesta or Jeffrey Epstein. All of these people worth millions of dollars. There's no coincidences here, right? No coincidences at all that all these rich and powerful people have weird, sadistic, violent, and sexual art on their walls, right? So there's a market for it, right? Who are these artists? Is what we should be really going after too, right? Is not only the celebrity that did it and purchased the art and put it on their wall and posted a picture of it on, I. But also the artist who decided to draw this and sell it to them, like, don't just go after the celebrity, go after the artist. Let's, let's absolutely find out who these artists were. Who are the artists that Tony Podesta was purchasing his, his artwork from? How about Jeffrey Epstein? How about Jamie Lee Curtis? Let's figure that out. Let's find it out. Who were the artists? That did this, and then we start going after them too. It shouldn't just be about the celebrity who purchased it. It should be about the creator of art because that's who we need to question. What makes you believe that somebody out there wants to spend $27,000 or 220,000, however the hell much money you guys spend on this stupid piece of art depicting a dead, naked child in a suitcase? And why do you think that people want to buy. . Right? That seems to be a pretty good question to me. Right? Not only are we talking about the celebrities, but we're also talking about the artists. That should be a topic of conversation and this immediately on the backs of the Balenciaga situation, right? Immediately. Right. It's like this, this, this, it, it promotes and normalizes the sexualization of children in child. Right. It, it, it raises sincere questions about like, why, why are all these people in, in positions of power promoting that? Why would they want to stare at that every day when I walk into my office at work, the last thing I want on the wall when I'm having a business meeting is a painting of a naked child dead in a suitcase. Who would want that over their desk in their.  and then who's stupid enough to post a picture of it on Instagram, , apparently Jamie Lee Curtis. Right? And, and, and I guarantee you she is a holier than thou liberal pointing at everybody but herself and their actions for, for, you know, being what's wrong with humanity, right? No surprises. If that's the case. Now, I don't know if that's a hundred percent the case, but I would not be surprised at all. And Jamie Lee Curtis has not even come out and addressed this at all. She hasn't responded to this. She hasn't talked to any news outlets, none of it. You know what she did? She silenced the comments on Instagram. That's what she did. All she did was get rid of comments. I don't even want to hear from you about my dead child sexualized artwork on the wall in a suitcase. Don't wanna hear.  right now. Now, there's an interesting correlation if you wanna dive a little bit deeper into the meaning of art, which is why most people purchase it. What does it make you feel when you look at it, right? How does it make you feel? Some art makes you feel happy. Some art makes you, you know, look deeper into yourself and, and, and, or motivated or, you know, whatever those feelings are. Sad, mad, happy, right? Whatever that is, right? That's what art's supposed to do is drive. What emotion is this driving? Right? But back to the fact that she literally just didn't say a word about it, has yet to say a word about it, and then just disables comments cuz she doesn't want to hear about you being upset that she has a naked child on her wall in a suitcase appearing dead. Right. It, it's, it, it, and here's the problem that I have with this. Absolutely nothing happened with Balenciaga. Right? There was a couple weeks of outrage. Now I hope that their brand plummets and continues to plummet. I think that there's definitely been a little bit of a movement behind looking at people who are buying Balenciaga and promoting it and, and,  understanding that this is what they do, right? This is what they're, they, a lot of their artwork that they want to call it entailed these little subtweeting of child exploitation or sa satanism or Right. Whatever it was. Right? So, so, so we, in the same way that you see Kanye just get literally ripped apart and canceled, I guarantee you nobody's doing that to Jamie Lee Curtis. I don't think she's gonna lose her. Chase sapphire. , do you? Probably not. Right. So I, it's sad to see that there's not been more of a conversation around it. Right. And, and, and some people are outraged and some people are talking about it. But if she still gets work after this, like why would anybody wanna be associated with that? right? Who, who are these artists? Why? You know, the fact that she's not even talking about it, right? Not even responding to this. She doesn't even feel the need to, to, to, to put a statement out. Right? So, moving on now, the next thing we're gonna talk about, there's been a ton of controversy surrounding the Philadelphia Flyers and their defenseman, Ivan Prove. Provera, I think I'm saying that right. All right. For those of you who don't know, Provera basically declined to go out during the warmup skates before the game where the team was being made to wear, uh, pride jerseys, like, uh, rainbow pride, gay pride jerseys. Okay. Kind of a weird thing to have your team do in the first place. Um, but the reason that he didn't do it wasn't because he hates gay people. Right? The reason he doesn't do it, he did it, didn't do it, was because he is intolerant of other people, right? He, that's not the, that's not the case. He came out and said that the reason that he didn't want to do it was because of his religious beliefs. When asked about his religious beliefs, he said that he was a Russian Orthodox Christian. Okay. And they were just like pressing him, pressing him, pressing him at this news conference and he's like, if you have any hockey questions, I'm happy to answer them, but I, I don't see the point in me continuing to answer these questions right now. Obviously you guys know this. I'm a big proponent in the First Amendment, and that obviously includes the freedom of religion, right? That's kind of a big one in the United States here, right? The National Hockey League, the United States National Hockey League. . Right? It's a fundamental right now, often overlooked in today's world and undervalued in our society, but he has every right to live in practices of religion as he sees he has every right to decline to wear a pride jersey if that's what he wants to do. Right? And he's did it so respectfully. Like he, he, he didn't come out and condemn gay people and say that he didn't agree with it or the, the trans community. He didn't do any. . All he said was, it's for my religious reasons, I don't feel like wearing it. And he was just getting torn to shreds. Right. He was getting condemned. People were calling for him to be punished and to be fined. Right. A bunch of like crazy left, uh, news organizations were condemning him saying that he should have even gotten like a million dollar fine from the flyers and, and it's, it's crazy. He has absolutely every right to make a personal decision based on. Religious beliefs, and he should not be punished for that at all. Right. It's, IM, it's important to note, right? Like I already said, he, he, he showed no ill will at all towards the gay community, towards the LGBTQ plus Element P community. All he said was he made a personal decision based on his religious beliefs, and he stated that he respects everybody. He did. He didn't come out and condemn anyone, anybody. , right? All he said was, I, it's just not my thing. I'm not gonna go out there and, and, and promote that actively. And he shouldn't have to. He's not a show pony. He's an athlete. He's not an actor. He's not a a a, a brand ambassador. He got paid millions of dollars to go play hockey, not to go pay, play political games for the Philadelphia Flyers organization. And what's funny about this is you see the reaction and where nobody wants the NHL to be. The NHL the last three to four years has gotten extremely woke, right? I grew up playing hockey since I was three years old, till I was 18. I did pretty good. I played triple A hockey, uh, in, in, you know, a very, very competitive area growing up and. You know, the, the hockey community was always generally right leaning, I would say. Um, it was generally in, in more higher income areas, which has an association there. But, but it was never, like, it was never used. The NHL was never used in the same way the NBA was being used. It was never used in the same way. The NFL even like with, with, uh, what's his name? All the football players Right. Kneeling during the national anthem. That wasn't happening in the nhl Right? They weren't playing the political games. And, and recently, you know, the, the, the NHLs Twitter is like, uh, or for a while at least I know it was like a, a pride flag in the background. Like . I saw something from the Babylon bee that says, if Ivan Pavlov said , that, that if he wanted to, If he wanted to promote gay pride, he would've played soccer It was like the greatest, the Babylon Bead does not miss, not once, almost everything they post is just unbelievable. Um, alright. Let's see what else we got here. Oh yeah, his jersey sold out completely right. His number nine Jersey sold out on, on the online NHL shop and the fanatic store. Worldwide after he, he did this, right? So it goes to show you that there are many, many people out there that share his beliefs and share the value of, you know, share in believing the value of religious freedom in the right to personal choice, right? Politics should stay outta sports. There's no reason for it. Athletes should absolutely not be punished for making personal decisions based on their political, religious, uh, ideological beliefs, philosophical beliefs, none of it, right? I'm quite proud of the community for standing up and showing that with their dollars, right? Nobody was, nobody was, you know, at least from that perspective, like maybe some media companies and stuff were calling for him to get fined, but as, as a consumer base, the, the hockey community rallied around him and obviously showed with their money that they don't care for your pride. Jerseys in warmups. You got the wrong. Guys. Right? This is not the n l this is not the nba, right? And apparently this isn't the, uh, you know, , the World Cup of Soccer. Um, anyways, and as a reminder, the Supreme Court ruled seven to two. Right when you were called back in 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the baker when it came to baking a cape for a gay couple around, around their religious beliefs. Supreme Court ruled seven to two overwhelmingly in favor of the baker to express its political beliefs, even in a business context. . Right. And this isn't even for him, a business context. If I, I, I promise you it does not say that he has to wear gay pride jerseys in his warmups, in his contract with the Philadelphia Flyers Right? I, I would be very, very surprised if that was the case, right? I, I'm pretty sure that's not, not what would've ended up being in his contract. Now, the next time they signed somebody, it might be after this happened, although they'll lose out on the Jersey sales, which would probably. . They don't care about that. They care about looking woke to the companies who are buying advertisements from them. Right? And that's the bigger problem with this. They're not even concerned about their base anymore. They're not concerned about what people want to consume because I promise you, a vast majority of the NHL consumer base is not liberal. Majority of the players who grew up playing hockey, at least in the United States, are not liberal. You're not going to find an Antifa member on basically any of the NHL teams. You're not gonna find somebody with a Black Lives Matter sticker on the back of their car, like I said, on very, very few NHL players cars. Right? It's not a liberal sport per se. Not definitely not as much as the NBA or the nfl, right? They, they're trying to make it that way so they can play ball with these big corporations who want them. , right? I don't know who owns the NHL at this point, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was Disney. So anyways, I'm glad to see that that was the outcome, at least, right? I'm very happy to see that people spoke with their dollars and made this happen in this way where there was a positive outcome for him, right? I hope he got some royalties out of those jerseys. At the very least, . All right, the next thing we're gonna. Is going to be, um, Stephen Crowder and The Daily Wire. All right. In the world of conservative entertainment, uh, there has been rising tensions between two of the biggest players in the game. That is Stephen Crowder and the Daily Wire. The Daily Wire being. Owned, or at least ran, you know, the, the face of the Daily Wire is Ben Shapiro, right? You have people like Candace Owens, you have, you know, uh, Clavin, you have, uh, Brett Cooper, you have, you know, all of the mainstream, the largest influencers in the conservative space come from or are some way associated with Daily Wire. The few that aren't are like Tim Pool. And that's about it. Stephen Crowder, right? Those are like the two really, really big, huge, massive platforms that aren't in some way associated with the Daily Wire, which I think is awesome. I think it's really cool what the daily wire's trying to do with the Daily Wire plus. Coming out with movies with people like Gina Carrano, right? There's so much positivity coming out of there that I was like, really disappointed to see this come up, right? This, this, this is not a conversation I want to take a side in, right? I'm, I'm in full support of the Daily Wire. I really like Ben Shapiro's content. I love Jordan Peterson. You know, Brett Cooper's great her, her social media content and everything. Top notch. Uh, Candace Owens obviously one of the most intelligent and, and well-spoken people in the conservative space. Uh, the list goes on, right? Uh, the, the, what is the woman documentary? All of it. All of it, all of it is incredible stuff. So, and been a fan of Steven Crowded for quite some time. I love his content and his comedy, everything. So like, this is not something where I really wanna like, wear a jersey in this. Now I have opinions about all of it, and I'm gonna tell you all of them. , uh, but it hurts me to have to even, you know, choose sites here. I'm not exactly doing, but I'll tell you what I find wrong and right with both sides of the argument. And you can distinguish for yourself what you think my total overarching beliefs are. But I don't think I have a exact side that I believe in here anyways. So this week, Stephen Crowder came out and publicly accused the daily wire of designing their influencer's contracts to tow the line of big tech censorship policies, or at the very least, have to. Have their pay be docked for every single violation against them, right? So if you have a YouTube platform and you get demonetized, if you have a Facebook and you get a strike against you from YouTube or a, uh, demonetized from Facebook, or you get a violation from Instagram, every single one of those things has a like stepping percentage that you lose of your income as a result of being demonetized. Right now, I think there's. Something to be said about that, and we'll get into that in just a moment. But, we'll, let's go on. Um, in a video posted on his channel, Crowder stated that Big tech is in bed with Big con, big con being conservative, right? So talking about the Daily wire, daily wire's obviously the biggest conservative platform out there, right? So, and he went on to criticize. An offer that he received from the Daily Wire without specifically naming the company right sees the next day. The Daily Wire ceo, Jeremy Boring, posted a response video in which he confirmed that the company had initially offered Crowder a whopping $50 million contract, but also claimed that Crowder was misrepresent, had misrepresented what was in the. Right. Boring. Also denied that Daily Wire was working with big tech companies to censor conservative voices and stated that the company has also been a victim of big tax alleged censorship, obviously with all the people that you're talking about here. Right. So, um, he read the contract verbatim, right? That, uh, boring is is the, uh, ex or president or vice president of the Daily Wire, right? He, he was, um, and, and this is the, like one of the bigger problems here is that Crowder is like friends with these people and. Came out in this big like gotcha moment and re released a recording that he had a conversation with. Boring and boring. Said something about, it sounded to me like the discussion went like this. Like they were talking about how Crowder had a problem with the clause in the contract. And it wasn't a contract, it was a term sheet. And the difference between the term sheet and the contract is that one's binding and to be signed, the term sheet is to start the negotiations, right? So in the term sheet that they originally gave to Crowder, which generally ends. Causing negotiations, not, you know, recorded phone calls in released social media stuff. Uh, the term sheet said, you know what, those stepping down demonetization percentages were for his pay of that 50 million if he got demonetized on any of those platforms or strikes or whatever. Right. , and that's the problem with this, is that those strikes mean that you have to watch what you say. Right now there is a part of the Daily Wire, the Daily Wire Plus that's coming out where you can kind of negate that issue, right? The, the hope is that they replace YouTube with the Daily Wire Plus, I would assume, right? And in that case, hopefully they wouldn't have to, to watch their mouths and their opinions. But at the very least what happens is the Daily Wire takes on these smaller. Influencers and brings them up through their platform, right? That's the idea at least. So they take these contracts, they give them to the person, they pay them a salary, and then they take ownership of all of their content, right? All of the videos, all the podcasts, uh, per, you know, cost and advertisements and space, and they give you a salary, let you grow your brand, and then, you know, eventually your contract needs to be renewed. And hopefully you can, you know, renew it at a really, Millions of dollar contract like they were offering Crowder to begin with. And so where Crowder had a problem with that is he felt like if they're doing the same thing to up and coming influencers, right?  Saying that, you know, what about that young person that they're gonna be hiring to bring up through the ranks And you know, if they're gonna be, you know, have to watch everything they say and, and or fear of getting their percentages paid because people were like kind of pissed that he was even upset when they're offering him 50 million over four. Crowder went back and asked for 140 million in a pretty  interesting way of negotiation. Tried to get them to immediately triple the amount that they were offering him. Um, but anyway, so that was the term sheet. That was what he had a problem with. And then he came out and said, you know, in, released a recording, right, Crowder. Basically said that, uh, the, the feud started with these two figures when the large scared divisions, right? The, while Crowder accuses them of betraying conservative principles, right? The, the, the principle of freedom of speech, of not holding back what you're thinking and, and, and not having to give into big tech censorship right now. despite the tensions of the disagreement, right? I think the biggest thing here needs to be the freedom of speech aspect, right? We, we need to maintain on the right side, at least to the anti left side of things, the anti woke liberal ideology, that freedom of speech above. All right? So I get Crowder's point in that. I get why he came out and had a problem with this, but I don't get his approach in the way. He recorded a phone call with a friend and then released this gotcha clip. What the clip said. Stephen Crowder recorded the clip, and in the clip you see them kind of discussing the, the thing that I just talked about, which is the docking of pay based on percentages and, and if you get a violation from social media platforms and Crowder released a clip of him talking about, of boring talking. How they go about that salary way and say, you know, that's how we do it. We bring them on and they're wage slaves and they can grow their brand and build a following and then go off and, and be famous basically. Right? That's what we do. We bring them on, give 'em a salary if we think that they can make great content, and then we let them flourish later. Uh, you know, we, we allow them to, to build a platform while making.  at the same time instead of out here bootstrapping it like you, boy, trying to make it happen without anybody. So, Crowder released the clip of him saying wage slaves. He like slowed it down a bunch of times, wage slaves, word slaves, and, and, and it was, it was supposed to be this big Got you moment. Now I understand what he means by wage slave. Wage slave is not like this ridiculously insulting term. It just means that you are slave to the wages that you're making in order to make your bills. Right. I understand that concept. It's not this like crazy, you know? Idea that like Crowder was trying to play to his base and make it seem like boring was insulting all of these influencers on, on these types of salary contracts. I don't really see much wrong with what he said in the recording. I don't at all. I don't see any reason that it should have been this big gotcha moment. I don't see any reason that Crowder should have thought this was gonna like drive a ton of interest in, in his debate with these people. Right. So I, I don't agree with it. It seems wrong to me that Crowder and to begin with was recording a phone call with somebody he considered a friend, you know, boring. Came out and said in the tweet like, I, if I recorded it, I would've released the part where we talked about his kids and buying and how Christmas went and buying diapers for his nephew or son or something like that. Right? He's, he's basically saying like, man, , uh, I feel stupid because he was recording my phone calls all along, right? And these negotiations had happened like months ago. It wasn't like this was a super recent thing. And what Tim Poole found out live while on an episode with Candace Owens discussing this, was that from one of his audience members commenting was that. The big, you know, say like what the, whatever the URL that he had, like say no to Big Con or something like that.com that he registered, was registered 12 days before the negotiations like fell through or so before something happened that caused him to make this move. So what that led to everybody to believe is that this was calculated, right? That was like Candace Owen's position was that, you know, he's only doing this to make money. She called him a bad person. She said that, you know, he, he burned all these bridges with all these people and, and now he's like off on an island on his own. And now he's trying to build a following on his own platform because everybody said no to him at the amount of money that he was asking for the 140 million over four years or whatever. So understandable. That seems frustrating to me. That seems like kind of shady, that you would record a conversation with somebody you considered a friend if that's what happened, and then kind of weird for him to play this like gotcha clip that kind of really didn't have much to do with the actual, uh, negotiations that he had problems with. It seemed to me like he would've been better off coming out and actually having a discussion about how bad the contract clause. The cause of the right or libertarian movements that are happening right now. Because if I have to fear YouTube's strikes for my family to be fed, then I have to watch what I'm saying. every single time I speak on, on the microphone. Right? And that changes the way that if, if it's a, if you're making a hundred thousand dollars a year or $200,000 a year or whatever, Brett Cooper, or somebody who's newer like that is making a few hundred thousand dollars, I would assume that that money is important to you. If you're gonna get docked 20% of your pay, that's gonna significantly impact you. Or two, you could get down to like only 20% of your pay if you get demonetized on several. So if you're making like $200,000, $400,000 a year and you get docked 80% of that, then you're making what, like 40 grand like. Would be atrocious. Right. $80,000 a year for the type of work that they're doing and the breach that they have. Like that's crazy. And so I get that right. It makes sense that there would be, you know, some type of push towards trying to have these contracts not include something about YouTube censorship or Instagram violations or anything like that. I also get that the Daily Wire is a business who is expecting the monetization of their shows to pay for the salary of the person who they're paying to own their content of, right? So it is definitely an incentive to self-censor on one side of it. And the second side of it is, From a business perspective, it's only, it's kind of like a necessary evil in today's world, at least until the Daily Wire Plus gets to where it needs to be, to where it's generating enough revenue to pay for influencers to come in and build an audience specifically on their platform, and not the ones like YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, all of that, right? So I see both sides. . I don't know who's in the right and who's in the wrong. I do know that I don't necessarily agree with the way that Stephen Crowder came out and did this like gotcha moment recording. I don't think that that was really the right move, especially if you're, if he was a friend. Right. And, and, and I also kind of disagree with the way that he burned all these bridges in hopes of building. His own platform because the whole movement that ever that is going on here, freedom of speech, freedom of choice, freedom of religion, right? The, the political movement that we're hoping for is the anti woke, anti-censorship movement, right? And, and so on one side of it, again, I get why this would be frustrating for somebody to negotiating a contract, trying to make this movement move along and be better, right? But I also get the business perspective of the daily wire. I don't know. I'd be interested to see what you guys think, you know, comment, whatever on the videos here. You know, comment on YouTube. Uh, speaking of YouTube, go join the YouTube. If you're not on the YouTube, I post the video episodes every single week. Right. You can go to my Link Tree, any of the social medias, you can go to the sub. It will all be linked on their red pill revolution.dot com or red pill revolution.co. I will be updating the website here over the next week or two and we'll be starting to put out articles and blog posts and news articles that we're, uh, I'm going to be writing up for you guys and distributing them through the subs deck as well. So make sure you sign up. All right. Now, as far as this situation goes, I don't think this is good for the free speech movement, although Brett Cooper did come out and say, That, you know, Brett Cooper's, I think 22, 21, 22, um, phenomenal. Really like her content. She does a great, great job at, uh, obviously, like she's, she's very, very sharp. Um, her content on social media is, is very well done. Her lives, everything. She does a really good job at it. You know, all almo, all of the influencers at the Daily Wire are, are like top notch. And so that's why I don't think that this is, this is. right? This overall like tension. Now this is probably the most drama we've had in the Conservative party, at least since like Trump was in office. So  it is, it is, uh, an interesting time to be, you know, not on the left side of things. Uh, but Brett Cooper came out and said that this was not in her contract because o one thing that came to Owen said is that she had a problem with the fact. Steven Crowder specifically talked about young and upcoming influencers, and there's only one , young and upcoming influencer. And that's Brett Cooper, right? She's 22, 21, 22 years old. Um, maybe 23, I don't know. But right around there. And she's, you know, had she said, which is crazy to me that she had like 7,000 followers last year at this time. And now she has millions, which like, you know, daily. Call you, boy. I'll jump on there. Take Steven crowd's place. , and, uh, yeah, I'll, I'll, if you wanna pay me, uh, 50 million, I'll be happy to, to, to, I won't even talk about anything that you don't want me to talk about. I won't even bring it up. I won't. I'll, I'll try not to blink. I'll, uh, I, I'll, I'll, I'll do whatever you want. Just, just for 50 million. That's fine. I guess I'll do it. So Daley Wire, call your boy. I'm happy to take the 50 million contract and I'll censor myself some from literally saying anything you want me to, I'm happy to do it. Happy to do it. Call me up, you know, Austin Red pill revolution.co. Send me an email. Uh, anyways, but seriously, uh, Brett Cooper said that this was not in her. She said that, you know, and that was something Candace Owens kind of took issue with, was that he was specifically kind of alluding to her contract and, and she came out in a live video yesterday and said, that's not in my contract. I sounds like she negotiated out of it actually. Uh, which it also seems like Crowder could have actually negotiated his way out of it like many of these other people did. Um, but chose to, I don't know, do what he did instead. , but it doesn't seem like all of the people on the Daily Wire actually have that sort of clause in there. So is it in all of the new ones? Maybe. I don't know. I don't know. But it, it is definitely not a good look if we're trying to promote freedom of speech, if you're having to have your influencer self censor. Right? Uh, but for 50 million, eh, maybe  anyways, that. Is what I got for you guys. Thank you so much for listening. Go ahead over to red pill revolution.dot com. I will actually be posting articles about each one of these topics this week. Um, I'll be sending them out in the ck I will be, uh, sending out the, the podcast companion. Over the next day or two. Uh, look out for it. I'm gonna be cutting the clips. Doing, uh, this will be coming up the next day. So brad pill revolution.dot com. That is my big ask. If you are listening to the podcast, go over and subscribe to the YouTube or the Rumble channel, or both, even better. Uh, you can do so at the Link Tree, uh, link tree.com/the Austin Jadas. Um, you can find me on, I. At Rad Pill Revolt, uh, or at the Austin J. Adams, um, Twitter, the Austin J. Adams and Truth social TikTok got taken away, but I'm starting to build another one. Uh, we'll see how it goes. But anyways, thank you guys so much for listening from the bottom of my heart. I hope you have a wonderful day and welcome to the Revolution. Thank you. 

What Is Pavlovian Response? Join us today as we learn about Ivan Pavlov and his dogs. Sources: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ivan-Pavlov https://www.verywellmind.com/classical-conditioning-2794859 https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1904/pavlov/facts/ Send us listener mail! Send an audio message: anchor.fm/inquisikids-daily/message Send an email: podcast@inquisikids.com

Welcome to our new and improved Slave Training series. Slave Training means to adjust the slave's core attitudes and behaviors to be more in tune with the Master's attitude and way of living. On today's episode we talk about combining Ivan Pavlov's classical conditioning and B.F. Skinner's operant conditioning together with Sadomasochism. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/bdsmunited/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/bdsmunited/support

Lá em 2019, quando este Cafezinho ainda não tinha este formato, publiquei um texto que vale ser repetido: os cães de Pavlov. Ivan Pavlov era um médico russo que fez um experimento interessante cerca de um século atrás. Reuniu alguns cães e começou a condicioná-los. Cada vez que chegava com comida, Pavlov tocava uma sineta, até um ponto em que, mesmo sem comida, bastava acionar a sineta para que os cães começassem a salivar. Ficavam com a boca cheia d'água só de ouvir o sino. Pavlov desenvolveu a ideia dos reflexos condicionados. Todos temos reflexos condicionados, a maioria deles naturais. Diante da visão de um cachorro rosnando com os dentes à mostra, imediatamente ficamos com os músculos tensos. Estamos condicionados a preparar a fuga ou o enfrentamento diante de uma situação de perigo. No cinema é assim também: de tanto assistir a filmes de suspense, estamos condicionados. Quando ouvimos aquela musiquinha já preparamos o susto. O gato vai pular! Mas também podemos ser intencionalmente treinados a reagir de forma condicionada a determinados estímulos. O que aconteceu com nossa relação com as mídias, especialmente a imprensa, foi exatamente isso. Anos de condicionamento recebendo más notícias, quebrando expectativas, vivendo desilusões, nos treinaram para o que somos hoje: uma sociedade desconfiada, cética, que sempre espera o pior. Quase não há mais espaço para o deleite, para curtir uma boa nova, para acreditar que alguém está fazendo algo bom. O otimista, o que acredita, o que confia no bom, no belo, no justo, é um otário. Parece impossível baixar a guarda e simplesmente curtir, saborear a notícia boa e compartilhá-la para que, por exemplo, outros governadores também abram mão dos aumentos de salário . Olha, há que se buscar o sofrimento, pintar o pior cenário, dizer que aquela boa notícia não merece crédito. Como cães de Pavlov, estamos condicionados a babar. Isso sim é que é herança maldita. Vou continuar a reflexão neste vídeo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1QVaUT4JJI   Gostou? De onde veio este, tem muito, mas muito mais. Torne-se um assinante do Café Brasil e nos ajude a continuar produzindo conteúdo gratuito que auxilia milhares de pessoas a refinar seu processo de julgamento e tomada de decisão. Acesse http://mundocafebrasil.com

Lá em 2019, quando este Cafezinho ainda não tinha este formato, publiquei um texto que vale ser repetido: os cães de Pavlov. Ivan Pavlov era um médico russo que fez um experimento interessante cerca de um século atrás. Reuniu alguns cães e começou a condicioná-los. Cada vez que chegava com comida, Pavlov tocava uma sineta, até um ponto em que, mesmo sem comida, bastava acionar a sineta para que os cães começassem a salivar. Ficavam com a boca cheia d'água só de ouvir o sino. Pavlov desenvolveu a ideia dos reflexos condicionados. Todos temos reflexos condicionados, a maioria deles naturais. Diante da visão de um cachorro rosnando com os dentes à mostra, imediatamente ficamos com os músculos tensos. Estamos condicionados a preparar a fuga ou o enfrentamento diante de uma situação de perigo. No cinema é assim também: de tanto assistir a filmes de suspense, estamos condicionados. Quando ouvimos aquela musiquinha já preparamos o susto. O gato vai pular! Mas também podemos ser intencionalmente treinados a reagir de forma condicionada a determinados estímulos. O que aconteceu com nossa relação com as mídias, especialmente a imprensa, foi exatamente isso. Anos de condicionamento recebendo más notícias, quebrando expectativas, vivendo desilusões, nos treinaram para o que somos hoje: uma sociedade desconfiada, cética, que sempre espera o pior. Quase não há mais espaço para o deleite, para curtir uma boa nova, para acreditar que alguém está fazendo algo bom. O otimista, o que acredita, o que confia no bom, no belo, no justo, é um otário. Parece impossível baixar a guarda e simplesmente curtir, saborear a notícia boa e compartilhá-la para que, por exemplo, outros governadores também abram mão dos aumentos de salário . Olha, há que se buscar o sofrimento, pintar o pior cenário, dizer que aquela boa notícia não merece crédito. Como cães de Pavlov, estamos condicionados a babar. Isso sim é que é herança maldita. Vou continuar a reflexão neste vídeo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1QVaUT4JJI   Gostou? De onde veio este, tem muito, mas muito mais. Torne-se um assinante do Café Brasil e nos ajude a continuar produzindo conteúdo gratuito que auxilia milhares de pessoas a refinar seu processo de julgamento e tomada de decisão. Acesse http://mundocafebrasil.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Deze zomer is Componist Des Vaderlands Martin Fondse elke zondagavond te horen in Vrije Geluiden op NPO Radio 4. Hij vertelt over zijn werk, zijn manier van componeren, over community art en over jazz, over de piano en over zijn favoriete muziek. En je kunt alles terughoren in het artikel op de website van Radio 4. 23.04 CD Beethoven the Violin Sonatas (BIS 2527) Ludwig van Beethoven: Sonate voor viool en piano nr 7 in c-klein, opus 30 nr 2 - I Frank Peter Zimmermann [viool]; Martin Helmchen [piano] 1'30” 23.10 CD Oud? (NBE ) Martin Fondse: Low End Hifi Nederlands Blazers Ensemble 3'41” eigen opname VPRO Martin Fondse: Low End Hifi Brandt Attema [bastrombone]; Wilmar de Visser [contrabas] 2'45” 23.24 EBU opname SM/2022/06/55/01, CHRTS Music Hall, La Chaux-de-Fonds, 2 november 2021 Miles Davis: Milestones for string quartet 2'33” Chick Corea: Armando's Rumba, for clarinet and string quartet 2'57” Johannes Brahms: Hongaarse Dans nr 1 in g-klein 3'01” Martin Fröst, clarinet Ebène Quartet Pierre Colombet, violin Gabriel Le Magadure, violin Marie Chilemme, alto Raphaël Merlin, cello 23.34 CD boomasiel (Eggy D. Music z.nr.) Egbert Derix; Herman Verweij: Te groot voor een ansichtkaart Egbert Derix [piano]; Huub Stapel [stem] 3'49” CD boomasiel (Eggy D. Music z.nr.) Egbert Derix; Frans Budé: Traveler Egbert Derix [piano]; Huub Stapel [stem] 2'42” 23.44 CD Works for 2 pianos (Etcetera KTC 1754) Jeroen Elfferich: Tanz Jeroen Elfferich & Ivan Pavlov [piano] 3'33” CD Works for 2 pianos (Etcetera KTC 1754) Jeroen Elfferich: 81 Emotional Combinations Jeroen Elfferich & Ivan Pavlov [piano] 11'43”

Does  the name Ivan Pavlov ring a bell?  This month's education series is dedicated to the school of psychology known as behaviorism. We discuss its two main learning theories: classical and operant conditioning. 

You've heard the phrase “follow the science” or “science is real” over the past several years. Having “science” on one's side seems to make a viewpoint authoritative if not infallible. The Soviet Union believed this wholeheartedly. Not only that but they believed their whole system of government itself was BASED on science. This was the “Scientific Socialism” of Marx and Engels put into practice on a grand scale. Science or the idea of it permeated every aspect of Soviet life to an extent that we in the West have never known. Socialism was supposed to be hypermodern. It would sweep away all  the social and cultural baggage that had accumulated over the millenia and usher in an era of pure reason and progress. This would be accomplished through the power of science. Through science the Soviets sought to reprogram the individualistic human mind and make it communist to the very core. From the very beginning Lenin was fascinated with the work of Ivan Pavlov. He believed that this physiologist who so expertly conditioned dogs to respond to the stimuli of his choosing held the key to shaping the collective psyche of the entire Russian people. They would be fashioned into obedient Communists through the power of science. A decade later the world got its first glimpse of what these Soviet scientists were up to. During Stalin's show trials high ranking defendants admitted to fantastic crimes that they had no way of actually committing. Moreover, they pledged absolute fealty to a system and a man they knew would soon destroy them. Had the Soviets discovered a new method of dark persuasion unknown to the west? Even the Nazis were unnerved by the idea. Soon an obsession with Pavlovian “brainwashing” would overwhelm the free world. It was discussed in universities, newspapers, films and even on the floor of the United States Congress. Meanwhile, within the Soviet Union, the scientific optimism and ambition of the 1920's would give way to repression and fear. Any scientist that dared to question the state approved Pavlovian doctrine would find himself out of a job, in prison camp or worse. The Soviets came to believe the human mind was simply a series of reflexes that could be manipulated to the will of the state. There was no room for any other opinion. In the 1950's a sinister new figure would come to dominate the field of Soviet Psychology: Andrei Vladimirovich Snezhnevsky. Under his rule, the state devised a new diagnosis for individuals who dared to question the absolute superiority of the Soviet system: “Sluggish Schizophrenia.” Now, if you spoke out against the regime you could find yourself locked in a mental asylum indefinitely with no right of appeal and no correspondence with the outside world. These “patients” were often heavily drugged and made to undergo tortures that many compared with what Jewish prisoners experienced at the hands of Nazi doctors decades earlier. How did a science that promised such a bright and limitless future devolve into a dystopian tool of oppression? Maybe that's just what happens when politics and science become one and the same under a system that demands absolute conformity.     

It's time for "A Twist of Psych!"On this round of "A Twist of Psych" Dr. Shari Valencic finally returns to discuss Hernan Cortes and how Psychology, specifically language, might have factored into his successful Conquest of Mexico and the Aztec.  Key Psychology Topics: Linguistic Determinism, Learning, Ivan Pavlov, Animal Research, War Dogs, Hernan Cortes, MalinchePatreon Link - https://www.patreon.com/user?u=34398347&fan_landing=trueBe sure to follow DGMH on Instagram @drinkswithgreatminds_podcast and Join the DGMH Facebook group @ "Drinks with Great Men in History"Cheers!Music:Hall of the Mountain King by Kevin MacLeodLink: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3845-hall-of-the-mountain-kingLicense: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Artwork by @Tali Rose... Check it out!Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/user?u=34398347&fan_landing=true)Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/user?u=34398347&fan_landing=true)Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/user?u=34398347&fan_landing=true)

The limiting factors that will challenge business owners in 2022 are inflation, Covid, and the recruitment of good employees.The bad news is that I can give you the solution to only 1 of these 3 problems. The good news is that it's the big one: the recruitment of good employees. Ivan Pavlov won the Nobel prize for proving it's not hard to sell a dog on the taste of meat. Successful jewelers know it's not hard to sell a man on the woman he loves. Recruitment problems disappear when you know how easy it is to sell a parent on their child. A couple of years ago, Dewey Jenkins and I had a series of conversations about opening a free, private day-care center as a benefit for the employees of Morris-Jenkins Air Conditioning and Plumbing. The thing that kept us from doing it was that the majority of his employees – the technicians – drove their trucks home every night and went straight to their first repair each morning. Consequently, they would have no opportunity to drop off their child. But still, it was a great idea. Do your employees report to a specific location each day? Have you noticed that space for lease just down the street from you? Lease that space. Get a daycare license. Hire 2 or more people to run it. Open your recruitment ads with the words “Free, Private Daycare.” (And now you know why I was explaining the importance of “framing.” – Indy Beagle) Prepare to be amazed at the quality and volume of job applicants. Your employee problem has now been permanently solved. You're welcome. What? What did you just say? “I can't afford it.” Raise your prices. Inflation is happening whether you participate or not. “It's easier to pay a big signing bonus.” Signing bonuses attract job-hoppers. “It sounds like a lot of trouble.” Paying big money for bad employees is another kind of trouble. Is that the kind you prefer? “I'll just wait it out. Things will go back to normal pretty soon.” Here's a fun fact I'll bet you didn't know: to maintain our population and our workforce, American women need to birth an average of 2.1 children each. The parents of today's workforce produced only 1.8 births per woman and the birth rate today is at 1.64 and declining. We are at least 10 percent short of having an adequate workforce because that 10 percent was never born. So if you're waiting for the workforce to get larger, you're going to need to convince women across America to have more kids and then wait 20 years for those kids to grow up. Child-care is a huge, for-profit business that is crippling the buying power of single-parent (and two-parent) households across America. It is within your power to solve that problem for a small group of people, and in so doing, solve your own problem as well. Give it some thought. And may you have a Prosperous and Happy New Year. Roy H. Williams

Sur Le Fil vous offre ce week-end quatre épisodes hors-série produits par l'AFP.  Le cinquième sortira dans quelques semaines sur le flux dédié Le poison de Poutine, abonnez-vous pour  ne pas manquer sa sortie !  Vous retrouvez Antoine Boyer et Sarah-Lou Lepers, mais dans un format plus long que Sur Le fil. Dites-nous ce que vous en avez pensé sur podcast@afp.com ! Résumé Il est « le poison de Poutine », l'opposant au président russe le plus déterminé. En 2020, il a failli mourir empoisonné. Aujourd'hui Alexeï Navalny est en prison et la Russie a beaucoup changé. Ecoutez les deux premiers épisodes de notre série ce samedi. Le volet #2 sera diffusé à partir de 18h00 ;-) Episode #1 La Répression  La nouvelle demeure de Navalny se trouve à une centaine de kilomètres de Moscou au bout d'un chemin de terre boueux, près de la petite ville de Pokrov.  Un an après son emprisonnement, l'opposant numéro 1 de Vladimir Poutine survit dans une prison de haute sécurité. Sa puissante fondation anticorruption a été  interdite. Ses partisans s'exilent, des médias ferment, un climat de “peur” règne chez ses partisans. Avec Konstantin Kotov, opposant et ancien détenu de la prison de Pokrov , Ivan Pavlov, avocat qui a défendu les organisations d'Alexeï Navalny, Ekaterina Schulmann, politologue spécialiste de la Russie, Piotr Tolstoï, vice-président de la Douma, la chambre basse du Parlement russe,  Armen Aramyan – journaliste à Doxa, un journal étudiant basé à Moscou, Navalny (archives). Crédits Présentation : Antoine Boyer et Sarah-Lou Lepers. Auteur·e·s : Antoine Boyer, Sarah-Lou Lepers à Paris, avec Jonathan Brown et Andrea Palasciano à Moscou. Réalisation : Antoine Boyer et Sarah-Lou Lepers. Traductions : Vassily Koloskov. Musique : Clémence Reliat et Nicolas Vercambre. Illustration : David Lory. Mixage : Christophe Robert.  Communication : Amir Ajkic, Boris Bachorz, Coline Sallois. Marketing : Eleonora Gallerani, Laurent Nicolas. Rédaction en chef : Michaëla Cancela-Kieffer, Michael Mainville, Antoine Lambroschini.

Il est « le poison de Poutine », l'opposant au président russe le plus déterminé. En 2020, il a failli mourir empoisonné. Aujourd'hui Alexeï Navalny est en prison et la Russie a beaucoup changé. Une série de podcasts de l'AFP en cinq épisodes. Disponible également en anglais.   Episode #1La Répression  La nouvelle demeure de Navalny se trouve à une centaine de kilomètres de Moscou au bout d'un chemin de terre boueux, près de la petite ville de Pokrov.  Plusieurs mois après son emprisonnement, l'opposant numéro 1 de Vladimir Poutine survit dans une prison de haute sécurité. Sa puissante fondation anticorruption a été  interdite. Ses partisans s'exilent, des médias ferment, un climat de “peur” règne chez ses partisans. Avec: Konstantin Kotov, opposant et ancien détenu de la prison de Pokrov , Ivan Pavlov, avocat qui a défendu les organisations d'Alexeï Navalny, Ekaterina Schulmann, politologue spécialiste de la Russie, Piotr Tolstoï, vice-président de la Douma, la chambre basse du Parlement russe,  Armen Aramyan – journaliste à Doxa, un journal étudiant basé à Moscou, Navalny (archives). Crédits Présentation et réalisation : Antoine Boyer et Sarah-Lou Lepers; Une enquête menée avec avec Jonathan Brown et Andrea Palasciano à Moscou. Traductions : Vassily Koloskov. Musique : Clémence Reliat et Nicolas Vair. Illustration : David Lory. Mixage : Christophe Robert. Communication : Amir Ajkic, Boris Bachorz, Coline Sallois, Vincent Burgaud. Marketing : Eleonora Gallerani, Laurent Nicolas. Rédaction en chef : Michaela Cancela-Kieffer, Michael Mainville, Antoine Lambroschini.

Alexei Navalny's new home is around 100 kilometres from Moscow, at the end of a muddy path, on the outskirts of the small town of Pokrov. A year after his poisoning, the main opponent to Vladimir Putin lives in a high-security prison. His anti-corruption foundation is banned. Many of his allies are in exile, independent media are closing down and a ‘climate of fear' reigns among his supporters.   With interviews of  Konstantin Kotov, former prisoner and opponent; Ivan Pavlov, lawyer for the Navalny Foundation; Ekaterina Schulmann, political scientist; Piotr Tolstoy, vice-president of the State Duma;  Armen Aramyan, journalist at student paper Doxa in Moscow.   Credits Authors: Jonathan Brown and Andrea Palasciano in Moscow, Antoine Boyer and Sarah-Lou Lepers in Paris. Hosts: Jonathan Brown and Andrea Palasciano. Editing : Antoine Boyer and Sarah-Lou Lepers. Translations: Vassily Koloskov. Music: Clemence Reliat and Nicolas Vair. Illustration: David Lory. Mixing: Christophe Robert. Communication: Amir Ajkic, Boris Bachorz, Coline Sallois. Marketing: Eleonora Gallerani, Laurent Nicolas. Editors in Chief : Michaela Cancela-Kieffer, Michael Mainville, Antoine Lambroschini.

After a month-long hiatus, Mary Jo (Pines) and Kellie (Pluto) are back and ready to talk about Pavlov's Mice! Set in early twentieth-century Russia, Pinky and Brain are lab mice for Ivan Pavlov, who has conditioned them to perform song and dance numbers whenever they hear a bell and gong respectively. While Brain is determined to steal the crown jewels from Tsar Nicholas II's winter palace during the Lunar Eclipse, he and Pinky face some inconvenient obstacles along the way.  Join hosts Pines, Pluto, and their first guest as they review the fourth Pinky and The Brain segment on Animaniacs, talk about comedy writing, and pitch the perfect Pinky and The Brain crossover. Contact us!Twitter: @poitcastTumblr: poitcast.tumblr.comEmail: thepoitcast@gmail.com Cover Art by @mygames19Opening Theme Song arranged by Ian Knowles

Edwin Twitmyer failed to close a loophole and it cost him the Nobel Prize. Twitmyer was working on his doctorate in Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania. His dissertation was on The Effect of Emotions on the Patellar Reflex, or Knee Jerk. To make his research possible, Twitmyer built an elevated chair with a remote-controlled rubber hammer that would strike the person's patellar tendon and trigger the predictable leg-kick. He didn't tell his subjects when he was going to release the hammer, he simply let it fall and then measured how far the leg kicked. When his subjects complained that the hammer caught them by surprise, Twitmyer began sounding a bell just before he activated the hammer. One day he accidentally sounded the bell without dropping the hammer and the subject's leg kicked, even though the tendon had not been stimulated. Twitmyer knew he had stumbled onto something important. He then began doing the same to his other subjects and found that they, too, would kick their legs forward upon the sound of the bell, even when they were trying not to. He published his findings in his doctoral dissertation in 1902, one year before Ivan Pavlov announced the results of his dog research at the 1903 International Medical Congress in Madrid. But when Twitmyer presented his work at a meeting of the American Psychological Association, his research drew little response from the crowd. Ivan Pavlov was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1904, not Edwin Twitmyer. Twitmeyer knew he had a loophole in his research, but he failed to close it. As a good scientist, he acknowledged in his paper that the leg-kicks of the subjects could – theoretically – have been caused by his subjects voluntarily moving their legs, even though he was certain this was not the case. That same possibility had occurred to the other scientists as well. Here's my point: When it comes to the purchases your customers make, each of them is occasionally a scientist. So when you speak to the customer's intellect, you have to close all the loopholes. If you don't, their doubts will remain and someone else, someone like Ivan Pavlov, is likely to make the sale. But when you speak to the emotions you are speaking to that part of the mind that is more interested in feelings rather than facts. Win the heart and the mind will follow. The intellect will always create logic to justify what the heart has already decided. When my partner Johnny Molson heard about Twitmyer and Pavlov, he said, “So the moral of the story is that if a fella named Twitmyer wrote about conditioned responses a year before Ivan Pavlov did, that means you and I have been conditioned to associate Pavlov with conditioned responses, which would make it literally a Pavlovian-Pavlovian response.” Here's my second point: The discoverer of a new thing – the genesis agent – is rarely the one who gets the reward. The fame, the money, and all the credit goes to the popularizer who knows how to get people's attention. You don't need to be the first. You just need to be the one people see. Roy H. Williams A

Jefferson Lee, the Director of Philanthropy for World Vision, joins Mitch to talk about the differences (and similarities) of the entrepreneurial spirit in both the non-profit and for-profit workspaces. After a brief introduction, including Jefferson's impressive fundraising record, Mitch leads the discussion by asking Jefferson for his thoughts about non-profit leaders. Jefferson responds with observations on the internal conversation one must have with himself about values, mission, and vision. The two talk about creating a culture that values more than just a paycheck. The discussion moves to the topic of what seems to be a natural transition for some – moving from for-profit to non-profit. Jefferson makes a point about the longevity of success, citing a friend he met in Hong Kong. The two speak specifically about entrepreneurialism in the non-profit space and Jefferson gives his three Ps, telling the story of a benefactor whose donations more than quadrupled because of those three principles and the partnership they helped forge. Jefferson also gives the origin story of World Vision and the atrocities that a journalist witnessed while covering the Korean War. A Korean American himself, Jefferson gives a sincere thank you to the United States for giving his family the opportunity to build a better life. The conversation wouldn't be complete without touching on Jefferson's success in fundraising for non-profits and he cites five points and a compelling story about changing the world one life at a time. Finally, Mitch and Jefferson get down to the most important part of the interview: where is lunch? Jefferson says that he can't pass up the opportunity to go to Javier's, an upscale Mexican restaurant with locations in Southern California and Las Vegas. Mexican food purists, the pair agrees that if the chips and salsa aren't good and fresh, then the rest of the meal isn't worth it. Jefferson assures Mitch that Javier's offerings are the best in the land. Table Talk: The team is together again, wowed by Jefferson's philosophies and conviction. Erin begins the conversation by highlighting Jefferson's statement on seeking significance. How are you doing to change the world for the better? She reminisces on her beloved grandfather – a self-made man and small business owner who reached far beyond himself to help those around him. After a minor mix up with Ivan Pavlov (and his famous dogs), Gil settles on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, where the pinnacle is self-actualization: doing what you are meant to do. Before being interrupted by Mitch, Gil goes into Jefferson's five fundraising tactics, starting with Number One – belief. But wait…that's what Mitch wanted to talk about. And Isaac says it's what he wanted to talk about. Erin points out that she's the only one with an original idea. Isaac jumps right in, reminiscing that belief is a fundamental part of public relations. Belief brings greater commitment and, let's face it, more fun. Mitch shares his own story about taking a job he didn't believe in…one that involved a broken-down truck, wholesale meat, and shady business practices. Gil also cites Jefferson's idea of making your ask into a case statement, expressing the urgency of it and why it's different. He also expounds on the importance of getting outside your organization to gain credibility, which Mitch calls a minimum viable product. Mitch brings it home by reiterating the importance of moving your success to significance. Links: World Vision https://www.worldvision.org/ Drive by Daniel Pink https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0033TI4BW/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1 Javier's https://www.javiers-cantina.com/about About Our Sponsor: Executive Scheduling Associates employs 120 professional schedulers filling the sales calendars of 500 financial wholesalers and advisors across North America. And we now provide short-term services dispositioning event and cold contact lists. Ask us for details at esasolutions.com. Subscribe to our podcast on Apple, Spotify, Google, and Stitcher. Follow us: Website Facebook Instagram LinkedIn

Alright alright alright, I don't really know how to introduce this topic in any way that won't make me giggle, but I'm getting into my theory on the sexual psychology of fetishes. We'll do a brief overview of introductory psych, including introducing some big names like FREUD and dabbling in our favorite Greek Mythology with Oedipus. (Did I just give you flashbacks to high school history class? Good.) Then, we'll pass the seven levels of the candy cane forest…past the sea of swirly twirly gumdrops… jk but I will speak anecdotally on my own information both from the unfortunate instances I've tried online dating and my personal private actual real life–in which men feel very comfortable telling me their sexual fantasies and fetishes. I'm not here to judge. I'm a scientist baby, I am FASCINATED by some of you. As long as you don't creep ME out and direct it towards me in gross demeanors, learning about the strange facets of humanity's sexual variance is truly the 8th wonder of the world.  A Brief Psych Background Psychology is an emerging field in western medicine and particularly American medicine, as our narrative and focus on psychology involves conflation of biological warfare and military development. *The CIA and geopolitical bias surrounding the Cold War and framing of the USSR, Eugenics, and democracy versus communism has entered the chat.* However, it can be traced back to ancient Greece in 400-500 B.C. (Think Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and great philosophers who pondered the mind).  Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), the pioneer of psychoanalysis, introduced theories of psychosexual development and sexually confusing relationships based on parental figures. In the 1890's, a Russian physiologist, Ivan Pavlov, used dog salivation to denote “Pavlovian”, or classical, conditioning showed two unrelated stimuli could easily (and relatively simply) become linked to produce a “learned response”.  Operant Conditioning, developed by behaviorist B.F Skinner, utilized external, observable behavioral causes over internal thoughts and motivation. It involves associative learning, in which the association between a behavior and consequence (which can be negative or positive) occurs. You truly cannot tell me if the porn industry was dominated by women we wouldn't already have conditioned men to cook, to unload the dishwasher, to put the toilet seat down, to clean the house, any basic household tasks or emotional support for sexual favors or interest. This is a simple technique I use on boyfriends. I reward or repeat desirable behaviors until they become second-nature. In society, lack of accountability with reference to a lot of issues, but definitely violence towards women, is likely the reason it continues. We are operantly conditioning men to not believe there are consequences for their (potentially dangerous) actions which harm others.  As a reminder, before we get into it–never fake an orgasm. The men do not need to think they “did a good job” if they did not. This is the participation trophy of sex. Cut it out. Sex doesn't “always” have to end in orgasms of one party or the other, either. It doesn't need to be some finish line or end goal if it's not happening and you don't need to feel guilty for it.  Neurotransmitters are chemical substances that are released at the end of nerve fibers because of nerve impulses diffusing across a synapse (aka: enough stimulation has been reached for action potential propagation). These are the chemicals that relay messages throughout our bodies regarding nerve sensatio

Welcome to the Soma collective podcast with me your host for this episode Peter Ostick, where we look to find the intersection between consciousness, creativity and the art of living.  This week I am delighted to have on the show Megan Osborn.  Megan specialises in Neuro Emotional Technique (NET) which is a process for unlocking negative emotional complexes that are stored in the body.  I have been doing some work with Megan over the last 12 months and found it really impactful as have some of the other Soma team members, so we thought we would get her on the show.  We explore the concept of the “body mind” which was popularised by Dr Candice Pert in her book molecules of emotion.  We dive straight into the detail of the science behind her work which sets us up to talk about how NET works and its origins.  One of the areas that we discuss in detail is the idea of conditioned responses which Ivan Pavlov documented and something which is incredibly valuable to understand for anyone trying to develop a thriving mental framework.  Megan is such a legend and incredibly intelligent, I always enjoy talking with her and hope you do to.  I give you Megan Osborn. 

In this episode of the podcast I discuss different behaviour change techniques and how you can develop sustainable health habits over time. I discuss how Ivan Pavlov's classical conditioning affects behaviour as well as why it can be so difficult to change an ingrained habit. Afterwards my own habits and routines are discussed, as well as why I structure them the way I do. This episode is for anyone interested in implementing new habits in the New Year as it gives you proven techniques for the best chance of success.

"We never stop learning". It's an adage almost as old as time but it's more than true. From the unexpected finding that dogs learn to salivate by associating his white lab coat with food, Ivan Pavlov was the first of many behaviorists to come. However, Pavlov's idea of Classical Conditioning was soon supplemented by B. F. Skinner's discovery on the power of operant learning on continuing desired behavior. In this episode, Edward Thomas goes into-depth on how Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning work, different reinforcers, and the impact of different reinforcement strategies on "extinction" or the tendency to forget associations.Don't forget to rate this podcast on whichever app you are using and tell your friends and family about this podcast channel, “The Mystery of Your Mind”, so that they too can learn a little bit more about themselves and about their world!  To get the latest and greatest updates about The Mystery of Your Mind, follow this podcast's Instagram account: @themysteryofyourmind !: https://www.instagram.com/invites/contact/?i=8u1196a7y367&utm_content=iyuwl16   To learn more about myself and this podcast, check out my website!: https://themysteryofyourmi.wixsite.com/mysite   If you want to support me monetarily, check out my Patreon!:https://www.patreon.com/TheMysteryOfYouMind?fan_landing=true 

While studying the digestive system of dogs, the legendary scientist Ivan Pavlov unexpectedly discovered classical conditioning: Automatic learning after concurrent presentation of two stimuli. His discovery changed the course of psychological research forever. Discussed in this episode: Pavlov's initial experiments on classical conditioning, examples of classical conditioning, major principles of classical condoning including acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery, stimulus generalization, and second-order conditioning, Implications of classical conditioning in therapy, treatment for alcoholism, and treatment for bed-wetting, classical conditioning in advertising, and experiments on classical conditioning of the immune system.   https://www.insightfulthinkersmedia.com/

Featured ContentChrissy Romano Arrabito is a career teacher and proud of it! She is currently an elementary teacher at Nellie K. Parker Elementary School in Hackensack, New Jersey and has over 26 years of experience as an elementary and middle school teacher. She graduated from Rutgers University where she studied Sociology and Psychology. She went on to complete the Teacher Certification program and earned a Masters Degree in Counseling from William Paterson University. Chrissy is dedicated to teaching the whole child, stimulating and supporting innovation in classrooms, and strives to provide authentic learning experiences for her students. Her true passion lies in nurturing the quiet kids, those that tend to fall through the cracks, those that truly need a champion to support and advocate for them. She is the author of, Quiet Kids Count: Unleashing the True Potential, Book 3 in the Lead Forward Series, which presents stories and strategies to make space for the quiet kids and find ways to amplify their voices and unleash their true potential.We discussed the following with Chrissy:What is one thing people don't realize about quiet kids? What is the biggest challenge teachers have to overcome when working with quiet kids?What is the best piece of advice you can give for working with or being accommodating to an introverted student?How can we apply all these concepts when interacting with adults who may be introverted?What is/are the biggest takeaways that you want from the readers?Resources@TheConnectedEduQuiet Kids Count: Unleashing the True Potential of IntrovertsWhat We're Listening ToAJ: How to Conquer Self-Doubt with Ed Mylett – “I am worth it!” “I deserve it!” This is what is going to be taught to believe YOURSELF!It's the feeling that creeps up on you when you need your confidence the most. That relentless voice that tells you, you're not good enough, smart enough, fast enough, strong enough, beautiful enough. Doubt can be so crippling. It can stop you from achieving greatness in your business, in your faith, in your relationships… in EVERYTHING! I can tell you a million times that YOU ARE ENOUGH but if YOU don't' believe in yourself, that temporary boost of confidence will eventually wear off and the doubt will settle back in. Confidence has to be cultivated from within! But how do you do this???? In this episode, I'm going to teach you the exact skills that will allow you to conquer self-doubt and replace it with self-confidence!Chris: Throughline (NPR) – “Becoming America” (2/13/2020)When the United States of America was founded, it was only a union of a small number of states. By the beginning of the 20th century, the United States had become an empire; with states and territories and colonies that spanned the globe. As a result, the country began to not only reconsider its place in the world, but also its very name.Stacey: Hidden Brain-When Things Click: The Power Of Judgment-Free LearningThis week on Hidden Brain, we explore an innovative idea about how we learn. It will take us from the Russian laboratory of Ivan Pavlov, to a dolphin exhibit in Hawaii, to a top teaching hospital in New York. It's about a method to quiet the noise. The sort of clutter that can turn learning into a minefield of misery. Students care more about getting praise than learning.Not all learning can be gamified, and not all learning can be broken down into a series of steps See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In this Minisode Monday, we talk about the pointless habit we all have of mentally reliving embarrassing moments in our lives and what we can do to stop it. Let's get to it! The Cheat Sheet: There are times when we all mull over embarrassing moments from our past. Like worrying, it's a pointless exercise. Ivan Pavlov proved that he could anchor a dog's feelings to stimuli. As humans, we're even better at doing this to ourselves. We beat ourselves up over a story we've built around a feeling and reinforce this negative pattern. The challenge: every time you start mulling over an event that makes you feel bad about yourself, try to remind yourself of a moment in which you triumphed -- an event that made you feel good. Try to think of something new each week that's positive and helpful toward breaking the habit of gravitating toward the negative. To learn more about social dynamics and productivity hacks, take the Art of Charm Challenge by clicking here, or text CHARMED to 33444. Also be sure to check out our Social Capital Intensive here! Let us know about how you put today's Minisode Monday into practice! Tweet with @TheArtofCharm in your response or write to Jordan directly: jordan@theartofcharm.com (he actually reads everything)! Listen to The Art of Charm, The Forbes List, and hundreds of your favorite podcasts with the free PodcastOne app (on iOS and Android) here! Does your business have an Internet presence? Now save a whopping 50% on new webhosting packages here with HostGator by using coupon code CHARM! Find out more about the team who makes The Art of Charm podcast here! Show notes at http://theartofcharm.com/mm42/ HELP US SPREAD THE WORD! If you dig the show, please subscribe in iTunes and write us a review! This is what helps us stand out from the crowd and help people find the credible advice they need. Review the show in iTunes! We rely on it! http://www.theartofcharm.com/mobilereview Stay Charming!