Podcasts about Acha

A dos años de la implementación de la Ley Karin en Chile, la Asociación Chilena de Seguridad (ACHS) dio a conocer un balance que pone el foco en la salud mental de los trabajadores.Según los datos recopilados por la mutualidad, el acoso laboral sigue siendo la principal causa de consulta, representando más del 80% de los requerimientos de atención psicológica temprana.En conversación con Una Nueva Mañana, Isabel Contrucci, directora de Estudios de la ACHS, detalló que "desde agosto del 2022, que es cuando se implementa esta normativa en el país, hasta junio del año 2024, hemos recibido más de 32 mil requerimientos de atención psicológica temprana", lo que significa que "desde la entrada de la ley hubo un peak, llegando algunos meses con 2 mil o 2.500 solicitudes".Una Nueva Mañana, con Cecilia Rovaretti y Sebastián Esnaola.Descubre más contenidos como este en Cooperativapodcast.cl

Tonight our own Scott Strande talks Purdue NW Lions Hockey with Head Coach Carl Trosien!  Don't miss ITHSWpodcasts Summer Series, ACHA Conversations With A Coach!  Join Scott on ITHSWpodcasts.Podbean.com, or wherever you get your favorite podcast! For more, click like and subscribe and go to ITHSWpodcasts.podbean.com

Atenção (disclaimer): Os dados aqui apresentados representam minha opinião pessoal.Não são de forma alguma indicações de compra ou venda de ativos no mercado financeiro.Seleção das partes mais interessantes das Lives de segunda.Live 382 - Visão do Estrategistahttps://youtube.com/live/vmpm-8HC2Cw

Tonight our own Scott Strande visits with the Head Coach of the defending ACHA M1 Champions. the Ohio Bobcats!  Don't miss ITHSWpodcasts Summer Series, ACHA Conversations With A Coach!  Join Scott on ITHSWpodcasts.Podbean.com, or wherever you get your favorite podcast! For more, click like and subscribe and go to ITHSWpodcasts.podbean.com

Promessas estão baseadas em palavras. E hoje, parece que as palavras estão em descrédito. Tudo em nosso tempo tem que estar escrito.As promessas são capazes de encher o coração de esperança ou de nos magoar profundamente, pois promessas não cumpridas machucam, mas algumas nos permitem sonhar.Políticos são do tipo que usam mal as promessas. Jogam palavras ao vento.Veja o que diz o Salmo 89 nos versos 3 e 4: "Tu disseste: “Fiz uma aliança com o meu escolhido e jurei a Davi, meu servo: Para sempre estabelecerei a sua posteridade e firmarei o seu trono de geração em geração".Não quero entrar no conteúdo da promessa, mas apenas no fato de que o salmo registra uma promessa feita por Deus a Davi.Tendo Deus como exemplo, podemos e devemos prometer coisas que estão ao nosso alcance e lutar para cumprir tais promessas. Promessas cumpridas podem restaurar relacionamentos e animar corações partidos. E elas também glorificam a Deus e isso é o mais importante.

Sermão para o IX Domingo depois de PentecostesPadre Marcos Mattke, IBP.Capela Nossa Senhora das Dores, DF.

Today our Conversation With A Coach takes us to Adrian Michigan, where we talk with the newest ACHA MD1 Head Coach, Doug Raymond!  Don't miss ITHSWpodcasts Summer Series, ACHA Conversations With A Coach!  Join Scott on ITHSWpodcasts.Podbean.com, or wherever you get your favorite podcast! For more, click like and subscribe and go to ITHSWpodcasts.podbean.com

Olá notável ouvinte!Você já mudou de opinião algumas vez?Acha que é normal isso acontecer?Quer saber mais sobre isso?Então clica no play e vem com a gente!Vida Longa e Próspera!

A great talk about AAA hockey and the ACHA

Veja o que diz o Salmo 84 no verso 10: "Pois um dia nos teus átrios vale mais que mil; prefiro estar à porta da casa do meu Deus a permanecer nas tendas da perversidade."De forma geral as pessoas se preocupam muito com a quantidade: mais dinheiro, mais atrações, mais curtidas, mais e mais.O salmista me faz pensar que a quantidade nem sempre é importante e com certeza ela não é o fator mais importante em muitas relações. Ao invés de se preocupar com a quantidade, você deveria se preocupar com a qualidade ou com a intencionalidade.De que adianta viver uma vida inteira e não desfrutar da presença de Deus? Talvez seja isso que muitos estão fazendo. Dormem, acordam, levantam, fazem suas muitas tarefas e não conseguem encontrar prazer e alegria porque lhes falta o mais importante: Deus.Deus é a fonte de todo prazer e por isso a preocupação do salmista é aproveitar cada segundo diante Dele. Que grande lição! De nada adianta correr e fazer tantas coisas e não usufruir da presença de Deus. Que cada minuto diante de Deus valha muito a pena.

Abertura dos trabalhos na Amorosidade

VOCÊ ACHA SIMPLES? Adalberto Braglia

Sejam bem-vindos ao magazine Semana em África, a rúbrica onde recapitulamos os principais acontecimentos da semana no continente africano. Esta semana fica marcada por uma nova reviravolta na Guiné-Bissau com o principal líder da oposição, Domingos Simões Pereira, a ter sido colocado em prisão preventiva, esta sexta-feira.  Simões Pereira vai cumprir uma ordem decretada por um Juiz de Instrução Criminal, no âmbito de uma investigação sobre a sua alegada participação num golpe de Estado que teria ocorrido em outubro de 2025. A defesa diz tratar-se de uma "cabala política".  De acordo com os advogados de defesa e fontes familiares, Simões Pereira foi conduzido por volta das 10 horas, hora de Bissau, para as instalações da Segunda Esquadra, onde vai cumprir a prisão preventiva. A medida teria sido decretada na quinta-feira, pelo Juiz de Instrução Criminal, Mamadu Embalo, dando deferimento a um pedido nesse sentido que tinha sido formulado pela Promotoria da Justiça Militar. O opositor Fernando Dias da Costa, que reclama ter vencido as eleições presidenciais de Novembro passado, entretanto interrompidas pelo golpe de Estado militar, denunciou o que considera ser uma perseguição política a Simões Pereira. Dias da Costa afirma que Pereira é vítima de perseguição unicamente por ter apoiado a sua candidatura às eleições de Novembro. Entretanto, os advogados de defesa do líder do PAIGC e presidente eleito do parlamento guineense, não compareceram ao Tribunal Militar, onde Simões Pereira, está a ser investigado, por considerarem que o seu processo ganhou contornos políticos e não judiciais. Portanto, dizem, não valia a pena ir ao Tribunal, instância da qual não receberam nenhuma notificação. Seja como for, é facto que Domingos Simões Pereira está detido na Segunda Esquadra, onde já esteve de 26 Novembro de 2025 a 31 Janeiro deste ano. Desde essa altura, Pereira encontrava-se em prisão domiciliária, sob forte vigilância policial. Após ser ouvido pelo Tribunal Militar na quarta-feira, o responsável político tinha sido notificado ontem à noite para tornar a comparecer perante a justiça nesta sexta-feira. Uma situação perante a qual as eurodeputadas portuguesas Catarina Martins e Marta Temido, bem como a diplomata Ana Gomes, manifestaram o seu repúdio denunciando o que qualificaram de inacção da comunidade internacional.  Guiné-Bissau: referendo a 30 de Agosto sobre nova Constituição Ainda na Guiné-Bissau, os cidadãos serão chamados no próximo dia 30 de Agosto a pronunciar-se sobre a nova Constituição do país. A sociedade civil insurge-se contra esta iniciativa, que apelida de "teatro". Cada guineense com capacidade eleitoral activa vai dizer “sim” ou “não” como resposta. A consulta popular será feita por sufrágio universal, directo, secreto e pessoal, sobre a entrada em vigor da nova Constituição da República aprovada pelo Conselho Nacional de Transição. O decreto presidencial, assinado por Horta Inta-a esclarece que “o Supremo Tribunal de Justiça emitiu parecer favorável” à realização do referendo. A questão que se coloca é saber o que diz a própria Constituição já que a maioria dos guineenses desconhece as novas formulações que constam do texto revisto pelo Conselho Nacional de Transição, órgão que exerce as competências do parlamento guineense. Os militares tomaram o poder a 26 de novembro de 2025, num golpe de Estado e uma das primeiras acções foi a alteração da Constituição da República da Guiné-Bissau que passa a dar mais poderes ao Presidente da República. A oposição e as organizações da sociedade civil têm criticado todo o processo que conduziu à alteração da Constituição que dizem foi feita por via da força. Seja como for, no próximo dia 30 de agosto, os guineenses serão chamados a dizer se concordam ou não com a nova Constituição da República. Armando Lona, coordenador da Frente popular, representando a sociedade civil, denuncia um "teatro".  "Não passa de uma aberração crónica, uma fuga para a frente por parte de um grupo que, todos nós sabemos que assaltou as instituições, que instalou uma ditadura sanguinária na Guiné-Bissau nos seis últimos anos. Apesar da derrota que sofreu nas eleições de 23 de novembro de 2025, não se acomodou, não se convenceu. Continua a multiplicar encenações, golpes cerimoniais, teatros, como agora estamos a assistir com esse pseudo referendo que não passa de um autêntico teatro no circo. Porque um referendo constitucional, em qualquer parte do mundo, é um acto de soberania popular. Acontece dentro de um quadro histórico duma realidade histórica interpretada pelo povo sobre a necessidade ou não de proceder a um referendo. E quando acontece, acontece dentro dos parâmetros legais, devidamente legitimado pelo povo do país. Na Guiné-Bissau temos leis que indicam claramente como é que se deve proceder perante um referendo popular. Qualquer revisão constitucional tem que decorrer dentro desses parâmetros legais. Portanto, o que está a acontecer nesse momento é um autêntico teatro de um bando que capturou as instituições da Guiné-Bissau, que tenta a todo o custo salvaguardar o regime que já está desmoronado. Um regime que está completamente à deriva, portanto. E tudo isso não passa de um teatro"." Neste contexto, acha que, porventura, muitos guineenses já tomaram conhecimento das alterações que a transição preconiza? Acha que as pessoas estão esclarecidas sobre o que vai ser o objecto deste referendo? Os guineenses não avaliam essas mudanças oportunísticas, essas mudanças ilegais. O que os guineenses avaliam é a tentativa da sua confiscação, da vontade exprimida nas urnas. O povo da Guiné-Bissau escolheu um presidente no dia 23 de Novembro de 2025 e aconteceu um falso golpe para poder impedir que este presidente assumisse as funções presidenciais. Tudo o que nós estamos a assistir até agora faz parte desse projecto de confiscação da vontade popular. E o povo da Guiné-Bissau não reconhece esse grupo, esse bando. O povo da Guiné-Bissau está determinado a lutar para fazer valer a vontade expressa soberanamente nas urnas. Moçambique: Igreja quer esclarecimentos sobre assassinato de bispo de Quelimane A igreja católica, realça o presidente da conferência episcopal de Moçambique, Dom Inácio Saúre, está preocupada e busca respostas para o que aconteceu na madrugada dia 06 de Junho na residência pastoral na cidade de Quelimane onde sabe-se apenas que Dom Osório Citora foi morto a tiro. "Ficando apenas o que foi dito publicamente pela imprensa de que o bispo foi morto a tiro, por uma arma de fogo sem nenhuma referencia as possíveis respostas para as perguntas cruciais tais como: quem matou exactamente Dom Osório, quem foi o mandante e quais seriam as motivações do assassinato". A Conferência Episcopal de Moçambique pede, diz o arcebispo de Maputo Dom Carlos Nunes, que seja levado a cabo uma nova linha de investigação ao assassinato do bispo de Quelimane. "Ali não é fábrica de armas. Veio de algum sítio, alguém trouxe essa arma. Então que se abra mais o campo porque o modo como agora está sendo orientado parece que é uma coisa de casa, caseira. A igreja tem problemas então é vitima dos seus próprios problemas". A preocupação dos bispos católicos foi manifestada em conferência de imprensa na capital moçambicana. Os arcebispos de Nampula, Dom Inácio Saúre, de Maputo, Dom João Carlos, e o emérito da Beira, Dom Claúdio Dalla Zuanna, mantiveram encontros no dia 04 deste mês de Julho, em Roma, com o Papa Leão XIV e com o Cardeal Pietro Parolin - Secretário de Estado do Vaticano onde onde foi condenado o baleamento do bispo da diocese de Quelimane, Dom Osório Citora. Entretanto, cerca de 1.400 moçambicanos foram repatriados pelas autoridades nacionais após a violência xenófoba na África do Sul. O anúncio foi feito pelo Governo que garante estar a acompanhar a situação e a criar condições para o enquadramento profissional destes cidadãos. O porta-voz do Governo, Inocêncio Impissa, revelou, esta semana, os números de moçambicanos regressados da África do Sul. Em São Tomé e Príncipe, a missão de observação às eleições presidenciais em São Tomé e Príncipe deverá chegar ao país entre dia 14 e 15 de Julho e deverá ser liderada pelo antigo ministro angolano, João Bernardo Miranda. Estas precisões foram feitas por Maria de Fátima Jardim, secretária-executiva da Comunidade dos Países de Língua Portuguesa. O Tribunal Constitucional são-tomense admitiu cinco candidatos às presidenciais de 19 de julho, nomeadamente Eugénio Rodrigues da Trindade Tiny, Nito de Sousa Viegas D'Abreu, Miques João do Nascimento de Jesus Bonfim, Carlos Manuel Vila Nova, que é recandidato ao cargo, e Jorge Bom Jesus, que anunciou a sua desistência já fora do prazo legal. É o ponto final deste magazine Semana em África. Nós, já sabe, estamos de volta na próxima semana. Até lá, fique bem.

This week we delve again into the world of adult congenital heart disease and specifically the realm of biomarkers when we review a recent report of the proteomics of the adult Fontan patient. What is proteomics and how can this inform our understanding of the pathophysiology and adaptive pathways of the Fontan circulation? Are there meaningful differences in the patterns of protein expression between the adult Fontan patient and control 2 ventricle subjects? What might account for differences and how can we understand these differences to explain outcomes in the Fontan adult patient? We speak with the first and senior authors of this week's work, Professor Alexander Opotowsky of the University of Cincinnati and Mr. Ismael Assi who is a Sarnoff Fellow and soon to be 4th year medical student at the University of Cincinnati. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102810 

Nesta quinta-feira, o economista do organismo de consultoria Novaminds, Pascal de Lima, uma voz conhecida das nossas antenas, publicou um artigo de opinião no jornal português Expresso com um título em forma de interrogação: "Estaremos a caminhar directamente para uma nova crise financeira?". Nesta crónica, Pascal de Lima passa em revista as crises mais recentes a que assistimos, a crise de 2007 / 2008 desencadeada depois da falência do banco americano Lehman Brothers, a crise de 2010-2012 das dívidas públicas de países como a Grécia e Portugal e agora os sinais que surgiram durante a pandemia de Covid 19 e têm vindo a acumular-se cada vez mais com os conflitos na Ucrânia e no Médio Oriente. Nestes últimos dias, desvaneceram as esperanças que poderiam ter existido sobre uma diminuição da tensão no Irão, com o cessar-fogo a ser quebrado por Washington e Teerão. Um dos pontos que continuam a provocar estes choques é o estatuto do Estreito de Ormuz, via comercial estratégica, que o Irão pretende gerir. Isto evidentemente não deixa de ter consequências a nível económico, refere Pascal de Lima que começa por recordar o historial das crises pelas quais passamos nestes últimos vinte anos. RFI: Como poderíamos descrever as três crises que conhecemos desde 2007? Pascal de Lima: As três crises têm naturezas diferentes. A crise de 2007 / 2009 foi sobretudo uma crise do crédito privado e do sistema bancário. Nasceu do excesso de crédito imobiliário e também da titularização e da ilusão de que os riscos tinham sido totalmente dispersos quando, na realidade, tinham sido amplificados. Isto é a primeira característica da crise de 2007 / 2009. Desde a crise de 2010 / 2012 foi diferente. Foi uma crise da dívida soberana. Depois de se salvarem os bancos e apoiarem a economia, os Estados ficaram mais endividados e, na zona Euro, isso revelou uma fragilidade estrutural. É que tínhamos uma moeda comum, mas não uma verdadeira união orçamental. E aqui começaram as divergências entre países do Norte e países do Sul, por exemplo a crise da Grécia. E a última crise, que é uma crise um pouco diferente, que foi uma crise aberta a partir dos anos 2020. Não é uma crise financeira clássica, é uma espécie de vulnerabilidade macrofinanceira híbrida. Começou com a pandemia, continua com a inflação, a guerra na Ucrânia e a subida das taxas de juro, da energia, a dívida pública, a dívida privada também. E, de modo geral, a finança não bancária. Portanto, a grande diferença é esta: que em 2008 o risco estava sobretudo nos bancos e no crédito privado. Em 2010 deslocou-se para o Estado e hoje está mais espalhado, mais difuso e mais difícil de ler. RFI: Depois da crise provocada pela falência em 2007 da Lehman Brothers, houve uma série de países que prometeram e inclusivamente adoptaram dispositivos supostamente para proteger os seus respectivos sistemas económicos da especulação bolsista. Aprendeu-se alguma coisa? Pascal de Lima: Houve muita regulamentação bancária contra os excessos da especulação. A especulação bolsista continua. Mas a regulamentação financeira, particularmente sobre as transacções financeiras, aumentaram muito no mundo, claro, e mais particularmente com a impulsão dos Estados Unidos para a Europa, porque claramente houve excessos no domínio financeiro, excessos da especulação. Portanto, houve muitas regulamentações financeiras e também taxas em certos países, taxas sobre transacções financeiras um pouco excessivas, que pôde criar variações importantes nos mercados financeiros. RFI: Entretanto, há outro aspecto que tem vindo a ter cada vez mais importância, é concentração cada vez maior de grupos que engolem outras empresas que estejam no mesmo ramo. O que significa também que há uma maior fragilidade. Pascal de Lima: Sim, dizemos em inglês 'too big to fail' para dizer que normalmente um grande grupo com fusões e aquisições não pode falhar. Mas, evidentemente, com essas crises constatamos exactamente o contrário. Portanto, observamos que quanto maior é o grupo financeiro, quanto mais internacional é um grupo financeiro, claramente concentra também muitos riscos. E, portanto, se há uma parte do sistema financeiro que sente fraqueza, os grandes bancos claramente vão impactar directamente sobre os consumidores nas taxas de juros. RFI: O que dizer sobre as criptomoedas, que são um 'player' cada vez mais importante? Pascal de Lima: As criptomoedas são outro sinal também desta nova fragilidade financeira. Não são hoje o coração mesmo do sistema, como os bancos em 2008, mas mostram uma financeirização mais dispersa, mais tecnológica e, por vezes menos regulada. Portanto, temos a regular cada vez mais os bancos. Estamos a regular cada vez mais o mercado financeiro, mas aparecem outras tecnologias que vão contornar as regulamentações e, portanto, em caso de stress no mercado, as criptomoedas podem simplificar ainda mais a volatilidade e a perda de confiança. RFI: Outro aspecto que também tem estado a ter cada vez mais importância é tudo o que tem a ver com as novas tecnologias. Pascal de Lima: A contribuição destas empresas é enorme em termos de inovação, produtividade e novos modelos económicos, mas também cria novas dependências, dependências tecnológicas, dependências perante o 'cloud', dependência dos dados, dependências das plataformas que muitas vezes são plataformas americanas com dados europeus. A tecnologia é ao mesmo tempo uma solução, mas também cria novas fontes de vulnerabilidade. RFI: Relativamente à última crise a que se refere no seu artigo no Expresso, a crise vigente desde 2020, como é que tem evoluído nestes últimos seis anos? Pascal de Lima: Desde 2020, o que podemos observar são sinais, sinais fracos. Portanto, o primeiro sinal foi claramente a pandemia. Isso é o ponto inicial. Provocou uma contracção brutal da actividade económica, obrigou todos os Estados, os bancos centrais, a intervir de forma excepcional. Mas houve depois outros sinais que foi também o aumento da dívida pública, que sempre continua e portanto, houve a pandemia com as despesas públicas da amortização da crise económica e das empresas. E agora também o aumento da dívida pública e o crescimento muito significativo do balanço dos bancos centrais. Portanto, evitou-se, de certa forma, uma grande depressão, mas ficou uma economia mais endividada e mais dependente das condições monetárias. Esse é o segundo sinal. Houve dois outros sinais que acabam por chegar em 2026. O sinal apareceu em 2021, com as tensões nas cadeias de abastecimento e os estrangulamentos logísticos e mostrou a fragilidade realmente da globalização, da modernização. E acabamos com a guerra da Ucrânia, que tem impactos até hoje com o choque energético, a inflação e a amplificação do choque energético com a questão do Irão. Portanto, o sinal principal é que entramos num regime económico e financeiro muito mais instável, com muitos critérios, com a dívida aumentando, inflação, taxas de juro, energia aumentando e profundamente ligada com a geopolítica. RFI: Temos estado num conflito 'on / off' entre os Estados Unidos e o Irão. O que é que se pode antever para a economia mundial se este conflito continua? Pascal de Lima: Hoje, não estamos perante um risco político isolado. O problema é que quando há uma tensão no Médio Oriente, rapidamente se transforma num choque económico com um choque energético e depois um choque inflacionista, depois um choque da taxa de juro e finalmente um choque financeiro. É por isso que no artigo falo de uma possível crise financeira. O ponto central é o Estreito de Ormuz. Se houver uma ameaça séria à circulação do petróleo e também do gás nessa zona, os mercados antecipam imediatamente uma subida dos preços da energia. Isso reacende a inflação e obriga outra vez os bancos centrais a manter taxas de juro mais elevadas, enquanto as taxas estavam bastante baixas há pouco tempo. Portanto, isso é muita volatilidade financeira e torna-se mais difícil o refinanciamento dos Estados e das empresas. E, portanto, o Irão mostra bem que o risco financeiro contemporâneo é híbrido. Primeiro, geopolítico, energético, monetário. E esperamos que não seja como 2008. Mas o risco financeiro é também real. RFI: Relativamente ainda a outro conflito que mencionou há pouco o conflito da Ucrânia. O que é que se pode antever para os países europeus, uma vez que tem havido cada vez mais aquele discurso de se virar para uma 'economia de guerra'? Pascal de Lima: A economia de guerra, economia de soberania, de limitar as dependências críticas é exactamente isso o objectivo da Europa, é o objectivo do Ministério da Economia (francês). O conflito na Ucrânia teve também um impacto muito forte na Europa, provocou o choque energético com a subida do gás, do petróleo e dos custos de produção e depois alimentou a inflação. Portanto, obrigou os bancos centrais à subida das taxas de juro e fragilizou o crescimento europeu. Isso é o primeiro aspecto. Depois, antecipando o que se pode passar efectivamente é difícil, mas é possível identificar cenários de dependência energética europeia, de tensões geopolíticas com a Rússia, vulnerabilidade das cadeias de abastecimento e falta de autonomia estratégica da Europa. Não conseguimos antecipar quase nada. E agora pede-se para antecipar outras coisas enquanto não conseguimos fazer com que os políticos antecipem crises geopolíticas de que muitos economistas já falaram já há dez, 20, ou 30 anos. Portanto, isso é o problema número um. RFI: Qual é o seu sentimento precisamente sobre o facto dos dirigentes políticos e nomeadamente os dirigentes europeus, anteciparem ou não estas crises? Acha que efectivamente eles têm estado à altura destes desafios? Pascal de Lima: Nenhum dos políticos tomou em consideração os conselhos dos economistas. Eu acho que é incrível, porque tudo isto são reformas estruturais. É um erro dizer que não foi nada antecipado. Era possível antecipar e, portanto, o problema é que os políticos antecipam muitas vezes demasiado pouco. Vêm os sinais fracos, mas reagem tarde, porque a decisão política é geralmente de curto prazo, enquanto os riscos económicos e geopolíticos se acumulam a longo prazo. Por isso, têm comissões de peritos, economistas internacionais, que falam sempre essas questões. Mas não tomam em consideração a opinião dos peritos no domínio da geopolítica e da antecipação de factos de longo prazo.

.Mentoria Professor Particular⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://felipeduque11.wixsite.com/website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Canal do Youtube sobre Concursos:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdUEy1gaVD7AO_URPUZrLtw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Canal do Youtube sobre Religião e Filosofia na prática:https://www.youtube.com/@felipeduque2342Livro da Reforma Tributáriahttps://www.editorajuspodivm.com.br/reforma-tributaria-esquematizada-ec-1322023-e-lc-2142025-comentadas-2025Livro Manual de Processo Tributáriohttps://www.editorajuspodivm.com.br/manual-de-processo-tributario-administrativo-e-judicial-20252Link do nosso grupo 2 no Whatsapp de Dicas Gratuitas (mensagens só pelo Adm) ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://chat.whatsapp.com/ERebr5tqthl8dNBDaK3Ixq⁠⁠⁠⁠ Mais informações sobre cursos: ⁠⁠⁠⁠www.raioxdoedital.com.br⁠Mais informações sobre mim:https://linktr.ee/felipeduqueLink do nosso podcast no Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/0cyIQ7i3edtRlIhH9U5Q7i.

We kick off our newest series, as Scott visits with University of Georgia Head Coach John Camp!  Don't miss ITHSWpodcasts Summer Series, ACHA Conversations With A Coach!  Join Scott on ITHSWpodcasts.Podbean.com, or wherever you get your favorite podcast! For more, click like and subscribe and go to ITHSWpodcasts.podbean.com  

O adiamento da divulgação das classificações dos exames nacionais do ensino secundário para 17 de Julho, devido a problemas informáticos na plataforma de classificação electrónica, levou PS, Livre e Bloco de Esquerda a acusarem o Governo de ter ignorado os sucessivos alertas sobre o novo sistema. O ministro Fernando Alexandre devia tirar consequências políticas deste caos nos exames?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ao lado do busto de Francisco Sá Carneiro, na entrada da sede nacional do PSD, Sebastião Bugalho começou nesta segunda-feira a sua nova tarefa de porta-voz do partido. Com as bandeiras de Portugal, da União Europeia e do PSD atrás de si, o vice-presidente social-democrata anunciou que o grupo parlamentar vai chamar antigos governantes do PS ao Parlamento para explicar o aumento “sem precedente” da população estrangeira em Portugal revelado pela actualização das estatísticas oficiais do país. Sem detalhar a lista de personalidades que os deputados vão querer ouvir, “é natural” que José Luís Carneiro seja um dos nomes a ser chamado.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Abertura dos trabalhos na Amorosidade

O Fundo Monetário Internacional alerta que algumas das medidas do Governo para a habitação poderão estar a aumentar a procura sem resolver a falta de oferta. Entre as críticas estão a garantia pública para os jovens e a redução do IVA na construção. Mas porque é que o FMI considera que estas medidas podem estar a agravar o problema? A análise deste tema foi feita pela jornalista da secção de Economia do Expresso Eunice ParreiraSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A Justiça (que prova o que já sabíamos), o PS (que aprova o que antes criticava) e o Chega (que anda a tropeçar nas próprias pernas) são o Bom, o Mau e o Vilão.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Introduction: What About Speaking in Tongues? It's Not That Important. (1 Corinthians 14:1-19) Tongues Are FRUITLESS. (1 Cor 14:1-5) Tongues Are USELESS. (1 Cor 14:6-12) Tongues Are MINDLESS. (1 Cor 14:13-19) Sermon Notes (PDF): BLANKHint: Highlight blanks above for answers! Questions and Answers: What About Speaking In Tongues? - Part 1 Jeff Miller Download Audio Transcript 00:36Open up those Bibles to 1 Corinthians chapter 14. When I was a very young Christian 30 years ago-ish, I had a very strong conviction. I had a very strong conviction that the death penalty was a horrible thing. Why?01:06Why in the world should the government determine if someone lives or dies? I thought the death penalty was an absolutely horrible thing. And then someone lovingly challenged me to see what the Bible says on the subject. Do you know what I found? The first man-to-man law that God gave was the death penalty. The death penalty is in the Mosaic law, and the death penalty is after the Mosaic law.01:36Law, Romans 13.01:39So my convictions about the death penalty radically changed.01:46And I'm saying all that to say, look, it's okay.01:52It's okay after a closer study of the Word of God to let the Bible change your mind.02:04And the subject we're looking at today is the gift of speaking in tongues. And there are some of you that maybe have a very strong conviction about it. And I'm sure there are a lot of you that maybe didn't think very much about the subject at all. But if you've been coming here for any period of time, you know that we want the Word of God to shape our beliefs and convictions. So by God's grace, let's go after His Word today to see what He has to say about it. So just please pray for me to communicate God's Word clearly and accurately, and I'll pray for you to have a heart open to see and receive what it is that the Bible actually says.03:04on the subject. All right? Let's take a moment and just go before the Lord together. Father, please open our hearts to what Your Word says. Not to what we experienced growing up or heard somebody say about Your Word, but let's take some time and really look and examine what it is that You actually said. Father, let us shape our convictions on that. We thank You, Father. We thank You for Your Word. And even when it's challenging for us living in a different culture and a different time, the truths of Your Word are eternal. And I pray that You would give us the wisdom by Your Spirit today.04:05to really grasp and embrace what it is that you've said here. Thank you ahead of time, Father. For what you're going to do today, we pray in Jesus' name. And all of God's people said, Amen. Amen. We go through God's Word verse by verse. Because context is important in anything you read. Especially.04:34the Word of God. And we're looking at one of the hardest chapters in the whole Bible today. This passage is so misquoted. And it is so misunderstood. But we're going to get through this together. Right? So before we look at the text, I want you to jot some things down. This isn't like the outline, but you can write it on your outline. But these are, I just want to give you four truths to help us understand 1 Corinthians.05:0414. With context in mind.05:11As we approach this, there's four absolute truths here that we have to keep in mind as we go to the text.05:21And this is the foundation that sets the stage.05:26All right?05:26So four truths.05:28First of all, we need to remind ourselves of the truth of what is the purpose of the gift of speaking in time?05:35It was a miracle, first of all, to affirm the apostles, and it was a sign of judgment against Israel. We talked about that last week, and we're going to talk about it again next week. But remember, tongues were real languages, not made-up gibberish words. They were actual real languages. And this is the way the gift operated in the early church.06:04The preacher gets up to preach and there are some unsaved Russians present. Well, the preacher never learned Russian, but he miraculously started speaking Russian. Well, the Russians were amazed. But then somebody else in the church had the gift of interpretation so they could translate what the preacher said for the non-Russian speakers in the church. That's the way the gift worked.06:34of tongues will cease. And we talked about that word means they will end by themselves.06:44Interestingly, tongues is never mentioned in the New Testament.06:48It's not mentioned at all after the book of Acts and after 1 Corinthians, which is the earliest epistle written.06:58It's just not mentioned at all.07:00But that was the purpose of the gift of tongues in the early church.07:04Second thing to help us understand this passage, let's talk about the gibberish prayer language. There are some people that believe the gift of tongues is speaking a gibberish prayer language, words that aren't any existing language. It's just a private, unknown language that you speak to the heavens. Where did that come from?07:34The truth is that practice came from paganism. And you can study this, but in Corinth, they had a temple to Diana, and that was how they worshipped. Everything there was about feeling and emotions. It wasn't about truth and engaging your mind. Everything in that worship was about experience and emotions. Right? Remember, the priestesses were prostitutes. It was about feeling something.08:02And part of their worship was shouting an ecstatic, gibberish language because they believed that was the way that you communicated to the gods. And church, that is never taught in the New Testament as a gift of the Holy Spirit. It's just not. Well, some people believe there are two kinds of tongues. You know, speaking known languages and them being interpreted and praying a gibberish.08:32language. But I can't see anywhere in the New Testament where tongues is redefined. From known languages to speaking gibberish. I just don't see it anywhere. So there was a gibberish prayer language that was part of paganism. All right? Third thing to keep in mind as we approach 1 Corinthians 14 is this truth. The Corinthians messed up just about everything. Have you noticed in our study?09:02They were like the Pittsburgh Pirates. Hitting, fielding, base running. Like, was there an aspect of their game that they didn't mess up? Well, if you've been through this study with us, that's what we have seen over and over and over. What the Corinthians did was they dragged paganism and worldliness into the church. That's been our whole year of studying this. Right?09:32Everything they did was from paganism and worldliness. Like hero worship, sexual sin, lawsuits, marriage fails, idolatry. Oh, and the pagan use of speaking gibberish language to communicate to the gods. They dragged that into church. Something else to keep in mind, very important. Last one. 1 Corinthians 11-14. These chapters are about church conduct, individual conducts. Do you notice that? People want to take these passages and sort of make them like an individual application, but these chapters are about the church collectively, the body of Christ. These chapters are more about us than me. So chapter 14 was written to correct the Corinthians, and Paul was saying the pagan way, the gibberish language isn't really a thing, and let me tell you how the real gift, the real spiritual gift of speaking in tongues works. Interesting thing to note. You're going to see throughout the passage here that sometimes Paul uses the word tongue singular and sometimes he uses the word tongues plural and he seems to be very specific and I spent so much time this past week studying this. He seems very specific about when it's plural and when it's singular.11:02scholars to believe that when Paul uses tongues in the plural, he's talking about the real spiritual gifts, speaking a real language that you never learn. Tongues, plural. Why? Because there's many languages, right? There's many languages, so tongues is plural. But when he speaks about tongue singular, he's talking about the pagan gibberish language because gibberish isn't something that can be plural. So just take a note of that. So this is going to feel like Sunday school today.11:32But this is so critically important to our understanding of a very sensitive subject to a lot of people. So on your outline, what about speaking in tongues? And here's the whole sermon. This is the whole sermon. You can leave after this statement if you want, but I'll unpack it for you. But here's what he says in chapter 14. What about speaking in tongues? He says, it's not that important. That's this whole passage. He says, it's not that important.12:05See, in Corinth, like in churches today, speaking in tongues was the thing. There are people today that believe unless you speak a gibberish prayer language, then you do not have the Holy Spirit. That is not true biblically. In this passage, you're going to see that Paul says, the gibberish really is nothing. And even the real gift of speaking known languages, the real spiritual gift that he's been talking about, he's like, even that's not that important. That's not that important. So let's look at it together. Number one, write this down. Paul says, first of all, tongues are fruitless. Meaning this, as far as accomplishing anything ministry-wise. He says it's fruitless. No spiritual fruit comes from speaking in tongues. That's the first point. That's the first five verses. What's the purpose of having a church service, by the way? The purpose of us having a church service is to edify believers. That's what church is for. The goal of church is to edify believers. Make note of that because he says that over and over.13:32and over in chapter 14. We'll talk about that in a few moments. Edification of believers. Look at chapter 14. He says pursue love. That's where we left off last week. Seek love. That's chapter 13. The love chapter. He gives your problem, church, is you're not loving each other. You need to go after that. Pursue love. Look at the rest of the verse. He says, and earnestly desire the spiritual gifts, especially that you may prophesy.14:06Paul says, yes, love each other, but also, yes, seek to use your spiritual gift, especially prophecy.14:13We talked about this.14:14Prophecy, the word literally means speak before.14:18It's just somebody that stands in front of people and says stuff.14:22And it's talking about saying the word of God, explaining the word of God.14:26That's what prophecy is.14:30See, Paul reminds us here again, church is to be the place where you hear the Word of God. If nothing else happens when we get together on Sunday morning, this has to happen. We have to get in the Word of God together. You see, tongues was never for that. That's why Paul comes right out of the gate and says it's better when you get together that you hear something that you can actually understand.14:59Look at verse 2. He says, For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men, but to God.15:11For no one understands him, that he utters mysteries in the Spirit.15:19Notice tongue is singular there.15:23He says, when you speak the gibberish language.15:25Oh, by the way, he says, speaks not to men, but to God.15:29That's really not a great translation. It literally should be translated to a God. Little g God.15:41When you speak in a tongue you're speaking to, you think you're speaking to a God.15:47Also interestingly in the verse, he says, but he utters mysteries in the spirit. That's not a great translation of that either.15:55The Word for Spirit, he's not talking about the Holy Spirit here. The Word for Spirit is pneumatai, which literally is breath. He's saying you're speaking into the air. And I believe that because he says the exact same thing later in this passage. You're going to see it. All right? So what's he saying? He's saying this. Spiritual gifts were to edify man. All right?16:25Common Good.16:26Chapter 12, verse 7.16:27Spiritual gifts are for the common good.16:30Spiritual gifts were never given to speak to God, a God, the God, who's ever up there.16:36He's like, that was never the purpose of the true God giving us spiritual gifts.16:47God never teaches us to speak to Him in an unknown language.16:54You just don't see that in the Bible. Look at every prayer in the New Testament. Every prayer and every teaching about prayer, there's nothing about speaking to God in an unknown language. And I would say, look at Jesus Himself. We have accounts of Jesus praying. Did Jesus have a private prayer language with God? Did He? No.17:24How do you know? Because the Bible writers told us exactly what Jesus prayed. Jesus used regular language and in all of Jesus' teaching about prayer, nothing says pray in a private prayer language. Actually, in Matthew 6, verse 7, Jesus said, don't heap up meaningless phrases.17:55So what you have here in Corinth is you had some of the people who considered themselves elite. And they said, you know, you pray in church and you speak Greek and all that. That's all well and good. But you know, I pray to God in my own private prayer language. Aren't I spiritual? And Paul's like, spiritual gifts.18:24Gifts aren't about you. Spiritual Gifts are given to edify everyone else. Look at verse 3. He comes back to it again. He says, on the other hand, the one who prophesies speaks to people for their upbuilding and encouragement and consolation. Paul says that's what needs to be happening in church. That's what prophesying is for. He says it's for edification. You're like, well, what's edification? He defines it right here.18:54upbuilding, encouraging you in your faith, encouragement, consolation. That word is comfort. You know, the Word of God should be challenging us and convicting us and encouraging us and comforting us. That happens when the Word of God is proclaimed. Look at verse 4. He says, the one who speaks in a tongue builds up himself. But the one who prophesies builds up the church. Again, he says, When you show up and you're just speaking your private prayer language to God, all you're doing is putting the spotlight on yourself. Look how spiritual I am. Look, I'm God's favorite. He gave me this super spiritual gift that I communicate to Him in our own private secret language. Now, the true gift of speaking in tongues has an interpreter that benefits others. Spiritual gifts aren't for God. They're not for you.19:54You, therefore, other people. Right? Again, verse 5. He keeps hammering the same point. You're going to see it again. He says, no, I want you all to speak in tongues. But even more to prophesy. The one who prophesies is greater than the one who speaks in tongues unless someone interprets so that the church may be built up.20:24Yes, this is the Pentecostal's favorite verse here. Look, right there, right there. Paul says, I want you all to speak in tongues. Paul was being sarcastic. He was saying, I wish you all did the real thing, but more so, I wish you all prophesied. You're like, wait, wait, wait, time out. Time out, Pastor Jeff. How do you know Paul's being sarcastic? How do you know that? Well, just go back a page. Look at chapter 12 and verses 29 and 30. Look at this. Paul says, are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? Do all possess gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? What's the answer to that? No. No. Paul just said in chapter 12, everyone doesn't possess one particular gift. He just said, do all speak with tongues?21:24No, obviously not. So Paul's not going to turn around and say, okay, now I want you all to do this. He's not contradicting himself. He's making a point in comparing. What he's saying in this verse is this. He goes, oh, I could wish that you all actually used the real spiritual gift and spoke in other languages. I could wish you all did that. But you know what's way more important than that? You know what would be so much better for the church than that?21:52is if you all were able to preach a real sermon. That would be better than everyone speaking other languages. He's being sarcastic here. So this private prayer gibberish language, Paul says here it's fruitless. He says, what does anyone get out of it? There's no edification, nothing's learned, no knowledge is given. It's fruitless because No one is being built up. And that is what has to happen in the church. All right? So what about speaking in tongues? He says, it's not that important. First of all, tongues are fruitless. They don't accomplish ministry purposes. But then he digs even deeper. Number two, he says tongues are useless. Tongues are useless. Look at verse 6.22:52He says, Now brothers, if I come to you speaking in tongues, how will I benefit you?23:00Unless I bring you some revelation or knowledge or prophecy or teaching.23:08He says, If I came speaking a foreign language, and again, assuming there's no interpreter when he does it, he says, What good would that do you?23:17If I came speaking Russian, you all speak Greek, it's not going to accomplish anything.23:22Verse 7, he says, he's illustrating his point. He says, if even lifeless instruments, such as the flute or the harp, do not give distinct notes, how will anyone know what is played? See the illustration? He says, even musical instruments have to play a melody or it doesn't make sense, right?23:51Didn't the worship team do a fantastic job today? Yeah. Yeah. They absolutely did. But you know, let's pick on my man Miles up here. So good at the guitar. When Miles plays the guitar, he can play a melody. And did you notice when Miles played, we were all able to sing along because we recognized the song. It was a tune, right?24:22What would happen if you went back to Harvest Academy and brought a toddler out and gave that toddler Miles' guitar and says, okay, now you're leading worship.24:31How would that go?24:33Whang! Whang! Whang! Whang!24:36Like, would we be able to worship together?24:39No.24:40And that's Paul's point.24:42He goes, even musical instruments have to play a melody or you don't know what's going on.24:46But if it's just meaningless noise, he's like, nothing is happening.24:49It's useless. Right? Another illustration. He wants to make sure we get this. Look at verse 8. He says, and if the bugle gives an indistinct sound, who will get ready for battle? Okay, now it's like a military illustration. Like the guy blowing the bugle for the military. It's like you better play a song that the soldiers recognize. Right? Because there's like a song for get up, a song for go to bed, a song for time to eat. How about a song for, It's time for battle. And if he just gets up there blasting the trumpet and nobody knows, wait a minute, what are we supposed to do now? I think we're either supposed to fight or go to breakfast. I'm not sure which sound that is. He goes, they're going to be so confused. It has to be a melody. You see, he's making a comparison between languages we can hear and understand versus any language.25:49We have no idea what's going on. What's his point? What's his point in all this? He explains in verse 9. He says, so with yourselves, if with your tongue you utter speech that is not intelligible, how will anyone know what is said? For you will be speaking into the air. There it is again.26:18You'll be speaking into the air. Paul's saying, look, gibberish is useless. Look, tongues are useless unless the real spiritual gift is used and someone is present that speaks that and someone interprets for the rest, it's useless. Do I believe that tongues happen today?26:48I do. I have heard many stories of people on the mission field that they were asked to get up and speak. And they're like, well, I don't speak their language. And they're like, well, just get up and say something in English and they'll just be glad to hear from you. And the guy got up and spoke and everybody heard it in their own language. I believe that. That's not what he's talking about here. And even that gift that I mentioned is not normative.27:18He's like the gibberish is useless. You show up in church and you just scream a bunch of syllables that aren't words. What are you doing? What are you accomplishing? Look at verse 10. He keeps hammering the same point. He says, there are doubtless many different languages in the world and none is without meaning. But if I do not know the meaning of the language, I will be a foreigner to the speaker and the speaker, Same point. Paul's like, if you don't talk to people in a language that they understand, it's kind of useless, right? We had dinner with Barnabas last Wednesday. If you were here, that was so fun. Our missionary in Thailand, Barnabas, he speaks ten languages. Ten. Seven fluently, and he says three about half. And I think he's being modest.28:18Why does he know ten languages? Because when he goes all over to these tribes, the Lisu, the Lahu, the Acha, he goes to China, he goes all over that area of the world, and he knows when he goes, he's going to have to speak a language that they understand. Otherwise, they're just making sounds at each other. That's Paul's point here. Right? Look at verse 12. He says, so with yourselves. Look at this. Since you are eager for manifestations of the Spirit, to excel in building up the church. He's back to the exact same thing he said in verse 5. He goes, do you want the Holy Spirit to work through you? Christian, do you want the Holy Spirit to work through you? All in favor? Yeah! Like, isn't that the number one thing that a Christian desires? Is it the Holy Spirit? Is it work through them? That's what any true Christian wants. Paul's like, is that what you want? You want the Holy Spirit to manifest through you? Great!29:19Because whether it's a foreign language or whether it's speaking gibberish, speaking anything people don't understand is useless. Paul says in this section, if real communication isn't happening, it's just noise. It's useless. The tongues are useless. And finally, number three, Paul says tongues are mindless. Mindless. More sarcasm. Look at verse 13. He says, therefore, one who speaks in a tongue should pray for the power to interpret. Again, that's sarcasm. How do you know that's sarcasm? Because of what he already said. Didn't he just say that the Holy Spirit is the one who gives people gifts as he wills?30:18He just said that.30:20So we don't see any example in the Bible of, you know, God, this is the spiritual gift that I want.30:25Please give that one to me.30:26He made it clear.30:27The Holy Spirit determines who gets what.30:30So He's obviously being sarcastic here.30:32He's saying, hey, if you speak gibberish, you better pray that you can explain what you're saying.30:41Verse 14, He says, for if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unfruitful.30:47What am I to do? He says, I will pray with my spirit, but I will pray with my mind also. I will sing praise with my spirit, but I will sing with my mind also. Otherwise, if you give thanks with your spirit, how can anyone in the position of an outsider say amen to your thanksgiving when he does not know what you are saying?31:17Here, Paul's just saying, look, prayer and praise must be done with our whole being, spirit and truth. We've talked about that before, spirit and truth. Jesus said the Father is seeking those to worship Him in spirit and truth. And for that to happen, your mind has to be engaged. Your mind has to be engaged. You know, people that believe in private prayer language will say, well, no, My mind is just kind of shut off and it just comes from my spirit. And I would push back on that and say, when has God ever told us to turn our minds off? You have to have your mind engaged in what's happening. I think a little humor on Paul's part. He's like, you just get up and you speak as she speaks something people don't understand. He's like, how are you going to get an amen? Who's going to amen that? Somebody gets up and just says a bunch of nonsense words. Paul's like, that's not a good way to get an amen. Verse 17, he says, for you may be giving thanks well enough, but the other person is not being built up. Again, you see, he keeps driving that nail down.32:47Again, there's no edification happening. You can't do that, church. You have to go to church with the mindset of edifying others with spiritual gifts. And someone would say, but prayer language is a private thing. Spiritual gifts aren't meant to be private. Spiritual gifts are to be used for the body. Verse 18. See, I heard an amen because somebody understood what I was saying.33:17saying. See how that works? Again, the Word of God is coming, just being fulfilled in your eyes. He says, I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you. Paul had the true gift. Paul had the true gift. You think that came in handy on his missionary journeys? Traveling around all these different people. He had the true gift. God gave him the ability to speak in languages he didn't know. He says that he speaks in tongues.33:48And I'm so glad he said that here because what Paul's doing with that statement, he's like, look, look, look, I'm not saying the true gift isn't legit. I'm not saying the true gift isn't useful. Verse 19, he says, nevertheless, in church, I would rather speak five words with my mind in order to instruct others than 10,000 words in a tongue.34:20Back to that same point. He says, in the church, five regular words are greater than 10,000 words that no one understands. You know, the 10,000. In the Greek, that was the largest number that had a word. You know what I mean by that? What I mean is, that would be today like somebody saying, a bajillion. Is that a real number? No, it's just like a bajillion.34:47like a figure of speech. Like, oh, you know, I must have seen a bajillion of them. Like, 10,000 was their biggest word for a number. And Paul says five regular words. What he's saying is five regular words are greater than an infinite number of words that nobody understands. Right? You get that. I mean, if two guys get up here on a Sunday morning, And one guy speaks gibberish for an entire hour. Words that nobody understands. But for a whole hour you listen to gibberish words. Then you have the other guy get up and he says five words. Jesus died for your sins. Which person benefited the church?35:49The one that wasted everybody's time making his noises? Or the one that actually communicated the most glorious truth that there is? Jesus Christ died for your sins. If you'll turn from them and receive Him, you can be a child of God. That's the benefit.36:17here saying any edification is better than many words that no one understands. So some have made gibberish, unknown languages, private prayer language. Some people have really made that the thing. And after countless hours of studying these chapters, I'm less confused.36:47that it's a thing.36:50But look, here's the thing.36:55You can believe completely different than me about this.36:58And that's okay.36:58I don't want to fight with you.36:59I really don't.37:01And I'm not, I don't, I don't get any kind of like excitement trying to shot block people or pound people down.37:12I'm not at all.37:15All I want to do is clearly communicate the Word of God. If you want to have a nice discussion about this section and talk about some of these phrases and words and what it means, I'm always happy to do that. But I don't want to fight with you. Listen, whatever, whatever you believe about tongues. I think it's pretty obvious what Paul is saying about it.37:46Whether it's speaking gibberish privately in prayer to God, the pagan practice, or the biblical gift of speaking a known language, a real language that the speaker never studied or learned, whatever. I think it's pretty clear in this section. Paul's stance is, it's just It's not that important. Here's the thing, church. Tongues isn't even the real issue here. Sometimes I think we can look at this passage, we can quote this passage, or we can misquote this passage, and we miss what's really going on here. Tongues is not the real issue in this passage at all.38:45Do you see what the real issue is? The real issue is this. What do you go to church for? That's the issue. Why did you come here today? If you're like, well, I'm not coming here anymore. Okay. So if you go to another church next week, why would you go there? What do you go to church for?39:21This is the real point of this passage. Church is the place you go to give, not go to get. Church is the place you go to give, not go to get. You had to have noticed how repetitious this passage was. Do you notice how many times Paul talked about this passage?39:45He talked about edifying, building up. Did you notice? I went back several times and was counting. How many times in this passage did He keep going back to that concept? It's in verse 1, verse 3, verse 4, verse 5, verse 6, verse 9, verse 12, verse 13, verse 16, verse 17, and verse 19. Just in the passage we read today. All of those verses have something to say about the us thing in church. Building up.40:14Every one of those verses has something in them to emphasize serving other people. And look, I've been in ministry for a very long time, and this is the thing that we keep hitting in this culture, especially in this culture, as we have brought the consumer mentality into church. See, that was the problem in Corinth. They showed up to church to say, hey, hey, Church is a place where it's about me, more spotlight on me, look at me, what's in it for me. And we're like, oh, shame on those people. No, shame on us because we have brought the consumer mentality into church. We evaluate churches based on what is in it for me. You know, we've heard so many things, haven't we, Pastor Taylor? We've heard so many things. We've heard people say, well, yeah, oh, I love her.41:14and people there are super nice. But you know, we go to such and such church because they have a concert atmosphere. Okay. I guess if that's what you're looking for, a concert atmosphere. We want smoke machines and laser lights and I haven't been to a concert in a while. What else happens? They still do mosh pits, t-shirt cannons.41:44We want that stuff. People hop from church to church looking for the one that meets their needs. Another one that I've heard, oh, Pastor Jeff, we love this church, but you know, we go to such and such church now because they have better playground equipment for the kids.42:16I can't compete with that. Someday we're going to have a church on this property, New Swickly, and someday we're going to have like, what, 10 acres of green space for the kids to run around on. Someday we're going to have that. I hope it's someday sooner than later. We're praying. We're seeking the Lord. Things are in motion on that. But right now, I can't offer you great playground equipment. We can, you know what the kids do. They go out here and play David and Goliath and throw rocks at each other. They play Humpty Dumpty and get on that wall. They did fix the wall. That is not a pass. Don't tell your kids, hey, they fixed the wall. Let's see how many of you we can get up there. But that's how some people evaluate church. They've got better playground equipment. You know why people do that is because of the consumer mentality. Church is the place.43:15where I should get something.43:20Why go to such and such church?43:22Because they have better coffee.43:23Okay, whatever.43:25Whatever.43:28Church is where you go to give, not where you go to get.43:32Look, that's the problem in Corinth, and that's the problem in Wexford.43:41In church, we need to get to the place where we're like, The Church needs to be about how can I serve others? Not, hey, I'm here for what I can get. And do you know what the beautiful thing is about that? When everybody shows up to church with this mindset of, I came here to give. Do you know what's so beautiful about that? Is when everybody gives, everybody gets. Look, you have a spiritual gift.44:13a few weeks ago. We all need you to be pouring into the rest of us. Your knowledge of the Word of God, we need that. Your experience in walking with Jesus Christ, we need that. On Sunday morning, in our small groups, in our youth group, all of these little people back here, they need to see in you what it looks like to follow Jesus.44:43you married couples. They need to see from you what it looks like to love your spouse. They need to see from you what it looks like to have a Holy Spirit gift that is used in the church. These little people back here need to see what it looks like to live a life serving other people, not constantly seeking to be served. So if our worship team would make their way back up front, Yeah.45:19I pray that this passage changes your mind.45:25Maybe about tongues.45:29But definitely about why you come to church.45:35Let's pray.45:38Father in heaven Father we're sorry For all of the times we try to make it about us, that we can look at the Corinthians and we can wag our heads and we can tsk, tsk, and we're no better. We look at their worldliness. And so often, Father, we're no better. So I pray, Father, that we don't get So caught up in this one particular spiritual gift that we miss the point of this passage. The church should be a place where I go to build others up. Comforting, encouraging, loving one another. Father, you see the culture we live in. It's a consumer culture. And I pray, Father, that you would bring a great conviction on us. That we look at this as the place where we come to serve. Not just simply come to receive. We pray in Jesus' name. Amen. Small Group DiscussionRead 1 Corinthians 14:1-19What was your big take-away from this passage / message?Before studying this passage, what was your personal belief on speaking in tongues? Did this passage change anything you believe about tongues? Why or why not?The theme of this passage is “tongues aren't that important”. What exactly does Paul say is more important?BreakoutPray for one another.

Atenção (disclaimer): Os dados aqui apresentados representam minha opinião pessoal.Não são de forma alguma indicações de compra ou venda de ativos no mercado financeiro.Seleção das partes mais interessantes das Lives de segunda.Live 374 - Visão do Estrategistahttps://youtube.com/live/-k8JKUCTaxY

Enquanto Donald Trump surpreende com declarações contraditórias sobre um possível acordo com o Irão — anunciando primeiro bombardeamentos e depois uma assinatura iminente —, em Portugal o discurso do Presidente da República no 10 de Junho, nas comemorações do Dia de Portugal nos Açores, recolhe elogios transversais. Diogo Feio e Pedro Delgado Alves analisam as mensagens de Seguro sobre as Forças Armadas, a autonomia regional e o papel de Portugal no multilateralismo. Sobre o diploma das bandeiras, os dois comentadores convergem: é uma guerra cultural que desvia o debate do essencial. Na Prestação Social Única, o PS e o Governo continuam sem acordo, com Pedro Delgado Alves a alertar para os riscos de um “cheque em branco” sobre quem fica de fora e quais os valores a praticar. Já Diogo Feio critica a estratégia socialista de oposição sistemática e apela a uma maior disponibilidade negocial. Ouça a análise dos comentadores no Antes Pelo Contrário em podcast, emitido na SIC Notícias a 12 de junho. Para ver a versão vídeo deste episódio, clique aqui * A sinopse deste episódio foi criada com o apoio de IA. Saiba mais sobre a aplicação de Inteligência Artificial nas Redações da Impresa See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Alexandre Garcia comenta pesquisa sobre aumento da corrupção no governo Lula, escândalos no Judiciário, e ação dos EUA contra facções.

Tema de abertura de Claudio Zaidan para o programa Bandeirantes Acontece

Baadhi ya wanawake wenye miaka 40 na zaidi, hujipata wana koma kupata hedhi. Hali hii huja na changamoto mbali mbali kwa wahusika.

Enquanto a polémica em torno da Base das Lajes continua a agitar o debate político, as declarações de Marco Rubio — apresentando Portugal como exemplo de submissão incondicional aos EUA — expõem o Governo às críticas da oposição. Daniel Oliveira considera que Portugal foi “apresentado como um exemplo de falta de exigência”, enquanto Francisco Mendes da Silva questiona a autenticidade do escândalo, lembrando que o PS sempre respeitou o costume diplomático atlântico. Luís Montenegro apresenta a sua moção de recandidatura à liderança do PSD declarando que “o não é não” ao chamado Bloco Central, equiparando PS e Chega. Na reforma laboral, o debate sobre se o Governo se entenderá com o PS ou com o Chega levanta questões incómodas sobre o papel da oposição socialista e a utilidade crescente da extrema-direita no jogo parlamentar. Ouça a análise dos comentadores no Antes Pelo Contrário em podcast, emitido na SIC Notícias a 19 de maio. Para ver a versão vídeo deste episódio, clique aqui * A sinopse deste episódio foi criada com o apoio de IA. Saiba mais sobre a aplicação de Inteligência Artificial nas Redações da Impresa See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Atenção (disclaimer): Os dados aqui apresentados representam minha opinião pessoal.Não são de forma alguma indicações de compra ou venda de ativos no mercado financeiro.Seleção das partes mais interessantes das Lives de segunda.Live 370 - Visão do Estrategistahttps://youtube.com/live/T6I2QHaxPSA

Chanzo cha waafrika kukua na jina la kwanza la kingerezea ni ipi? Video hii inachambua usuli wa tabia hii ili kukufahamisha historia ambayo wengi wetu hatujapata kuelewa. Tazama ujifunze mengi.

Lambda lambda lambda, Hell's Kitchen! Hora de reunir o tribunal para o julgamento da segunda temporada de Demolidor: Renascido.  Neste NerdCast, os nobres catedráticos Rex (saído da geladeira), Sr. K, Carlos Voltor, Marcelo Bassoli e Azaghal avaliam se o retorno de Matt Murdock à porradaria valeu a pena, ou será que a Marvel continua complicada até na TV? Hostinger Crie seu site com facilidade e 10% de desconto utilizando o cupom JOVEMNERD: https://jovemnerd.short.gy/hostinger_nc1 NerdStore Pijamas Cthulhu, moletons e mais produtos do universo Jovem Nerd com o cupom NERD20 (LIMITADO!): https://jovemnerd.short.gy/sp2_nerdstore NerdCast 20 Anos - CAÇA AO TESOURO Ouça a dica na leitura de e-mails e vá até o post do NerdCast que você ACHA ser a solução da charada. Abra o link escondido na página em questão e salve o seu selo. ATENÇÃO: Cada pista levará até o post no SITE/APP de um programa clássico do NerdCast. O selo constará apenas no SITE/APP do Jovem Nerd. Regulamento Caça aos Selos: https://bit.ly/494oQbz OZOB: A CYBERPUNK BOARD GAME Atualize/confira seu endereço em ozob.com.br. Assista à live de atualizações da produção: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzXA0R0Q4VA CONFIRA OS OUTROS CANAIS DO JOVEM NERD E-MAILS Mande suas críticas, elogios, sugestões e caneladas para nerdcast@jovemnerd.com.br APP JOVEM NERD: Google Play Store | Apple App Store ARTE DA VITRINE: Randall Random Baixe a versão Wallpaper da vitrine EDIÇÃO COMPLETA POR RADIOFOBIA PODCAST E MULTIMÍDIA Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dini hizi ambazo zimechukua sehemu kubwa ya maisha yetu, zilitoka wapi? Video hii inagusia ujio wa dini ya kiislamu na kikristo kwenye ukanda wa East Africa. Tazama kisha ushiriki mawazo yako. Asante

WE APPRECIATE EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU! If you wouldn't mind please go leave us a review on Apple Podcasts! Thanks!!Welcome back to Episode 417 of On the Spot Sports and in today's episode we have a very special guest, professional hockey player, Chad Purdy! Chad and I talk about his season with the Twin City Thunderbirds in the FPHL. We also talk about his mentality through the season and how he manages the highs and the lows, his journey from ACHA with McKendree University to playing in the FPHL, his development through junior hockey, getting his first few pro starts and so much more! We hope you guys enjoy this episode!!Thank you Chad for coming on the show! I had a blast!!Follow us on Instagram @on_the_spot_sports and take a listen on YouTube, Spotify and Apple/Google Podcasts @ On The Spot SportsGet $25 off our guy Jamie Phillips Nutrition book for Hockey Players with the discount code "ONTHESPOT" on victoremnutrition.comLiving Sisu link: ⁠⁠https://livingsisu.com/app/devenirmem.... BECOME A MEMBER TODAY

Karibu kwenye msururu mpya wa vipindi vya uchambuzi wangu wa maudhui tofauti tofauti katika maisha yetu. Natumai utafurahia

Compre a regata oficial do Corrida no ArMasculina - https://cnoar.run/RegataMasculinaCNAFeminina - https://cnoar.run/RegataFemininaCNAFaça camisetas, regatas, sacochilas e muito mais com a Ecco Bolsas e Camisetas - https://eccobolsas.com.br/Participe da Asics Run Challenge (use o cupom CORRIDANOAR10 para ter 10% de desconto na inscrição) - https://cnoar.run/Runchallenge10 Milhas Garoto recebe selo da World Athletics, Meia de Balneario Camburiu também, só que um selo é diferente do outro e vou explicar pra vocês; Maratona do Paraná recebeu o selo ouro da CBAt e só falta a de Aracaju pra deixar o circuito Brasil Gigante "ourificado"; Apple virou parceira da MAratona de Londres. Nossos links - https://linktr.ee/corridanoarO Corrida no Ar News é produzido diariamente e postado por volta das 6 da manhã.

Passagens Complementares:Jeremias 29,13

Sociedade protetora das betas que andam bronzeadas o ano inteiro.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Celebrating the Bobcat's Hockey Championship with OU player Graham Broadfoot...plus MLB two weeks in...March Madness recap...The Masters on tap and the Cavs head for the playoffs

Atenção (disclaimer): Os dados aqui apresentados representam minha opinião pessoal.Não são de forma alguma indicações de compra ou venda de ativos no mercado financeiro.Seleção das partes mais interessantes das Lives de segunda.Live 364 - Visão do Estrategistahttps://youtube.com/live/bcm1-oDYINE

"TODA MULHER SÁBIA EDIFICA A SUA CASA; mas a tola a derruba com as próprias mãos." Provérbios 14:1"O TEMOR DO SENHOR é o princípio da sabedoria, e o conhecimento do Santo a prudência." Provérbios 9:10

Sócrates sente-se abandonado e agarra-se a peluche.

Nova camisola do Benfica vai ter gola alta.

This week we review a fascinating very long-term surgical follow-up study from the team at Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne reviewing over 30 year follow-up following the arterial switch operation for the treatment of transposition of the great vessels. What percentage of patients need reintervention by 30 years post neonatal repair? What anatomical sub-types are more likely to be associated with a need for reintervention and why? When intervention is required for neo-aortic or aortic root problems, can these usually be repaired or do they require replacement? Professor Igor Konstantinov from Melbourne shares his deep insights into this complex patient group. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.008

Nova MAI.

Miguel Sousa Tavares e Ricardo Costa foram os protagonistas de um episódio extra dos podcasts "De Viva Voz" e "Esta Semana" que decorreu no festival de Podcasts do Expresso. A nova ordem mundial (ou será desordem? perguntava um dos oradores) o papel da Europa e de Portugal estiveram em debate. A conversa não deixou de fora as presidenciais: Ventura ou Seguro, o que esperar da politica caseira daqui em diante?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Alexandre Garcia comenta sobre situação de Toffoli em relação ao Banco Master e de inconsistências em discurso de Fachin