Podcasts about Muda

Este conteúdo é um trecho do episódio: "Crafty: de informação espalhada a agente corporativo funcional"Nele, Clésio Leonardo Belo, AI Product Manager, e Henrique Machado, Lead Developer, ambos da dti digital, discutem o que muda no trabalho de produto quando a interface deixa de ser uma tela e passa a ser uma conversa. O time mostra como a decisão de levar o Crafty para o Teams foi o que transformou os indicadores de uso. E por que isso mostra que projetar experiência conversacional exige uma mentalidade completamente diferente. Dê o play e ouça agora!Assuntos abordados:Agent experience;Interface conversacional;Decisão de canal;Comportamento do usuário;Papel do designer em IA.Links importantes:Vagas disponíveisNewsletterDúvidas? Nos mande pelo LinkedinContato:  entrechaves@dtidigital.com.brO Entre Chaves é uma iniciativa da dti digital, uma empresa WPP #inteligenciaartificial #cases

Pedro Henriques explica as novas regras de 5 e 10 segundos que prometem acelerar o Mundial. Analista também as três expulsões no México-África do Sul e a polémica do árbitro Omar Artan.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Salespeople in Japan do not fail because the market is difficult, the boss is demanding, the price is too high, or the brochure is weak. Those factors may be real, but they are not the whole story. The bigger issue is whether the salesperson is taking responsibility for improving their own sales ability. Sales is a metrics-based profession. Results show up quickly. If the numbers are poor, excuses will not save the salesperson for long. The better path is simple, but not easy: study the craft, ask better questions, listen properly, match the solution to the buyer's real needs, justify the value, deliver, and follow up. Why do salespeople in Japan make excuses? Salespeople make excuses because blaming external factors is easier than confronting weak sales skills. The market, pricing, exchange rates, industry shifts, sales materials, and management decisions may all matter, but they cannot replace personal responsibility. In Japan's B2B market, salespeople often face long buying cycles, consensus decision-making, conservative procurement processes, and high expectations around trust. In the US or Australia, the sales conversation may move faster. In Europe, compliance and procurement rules may slow things down. Different markets create different challenges, but poor technique travels badly everywhere. If the salesperson cannot ask good questions, listen carefully, diagnose the buyer's need, and explain value clearly, then the excuses start piling up. The problem is rarely one external factor. It is usually a lack of professional sales discipline. Do now: Before blaming the market, identify the one sales skill you personally need to improve this week. Why is sales such a tough profession? Sales is tough because it is a numbers game and poor performance becomes visible quickly. Unlike many roles, sales exposes weak habits through missed targets, low conversion rates, thin pipelines, and lost opportunities. Many people fall into sales by accident. They may begin as technical specialists, customer service staff, entrepreneurs, recruiters, account managers, or young employees assigned to revenue work. Then the metrics arrive: calls, meetings, proposals, close rates, revenue, retention, referrals, and account growth. In Japan, where long-term client relationships matter, weak sales behaviour can damage trust for years. Companies sometimes rely on the "law of the jungle," letting turnover decide who stays instead of investing seriously in training. That is wasteful, but the individual salesperson still has to take charge. Do now: Track your own numbers honestly: prospecting activity, discovery quality, proposal conversion, follow-up speed, and repeat business. What should salespeople study to become true professionals? Salespeople should study questioning, listening, diagnosis, value explanation, objection handling, follow-up, and client relationship building. These are not mysterious talents; they are learnable professional skills. There has never been a better time to self-educate in sales. Books, podcasts, online courses, coaching programmes, CRM data, AI roleplay tools, and sales training organisations such as Dale Carnegie, Sandler, Miller Heiman, Challenger, and SPIN Selling have made high-quality learning widely available. As of 2025, even small business salespeople and entrepreneurs can access material that was once reserved for large multinationals. The issue is not scarcity of information. The issue is motivation. If salespeople do not connect study with results, they stay amateur. Do now: Choose one sales resource, study it daily for 20 minutes, and apply one technique in your next client conversation. What is the simple professional sales process? The professional sales process is simple: ask what the client needs, listen carefully, confirm fit, explain value, deliver the solution, and follow up. The difficulty is not the theory; it is the discipline to do it every time. In Japan, this process is especially important because buyers value trust, preparation, relevance, and sincerity. The salesperson should not rush into a product pitch. First, understand the buyer's current situation, desired outcome, barriers, priorities, timing, budget, and decision process. Then decide honestly whether your solution fits. If it does, explain the trade-off between price and value. If it does not, say so. That honesty protects the relationship and the brand. Professional selling is not pushing. It is matching value to need. Do now: In your next meeting, spend more time asking and listening than explaining your product. What do weak salespeople do instead? Weak salespeople pitch product details before they know whether the buyer actually needs them. They talk first, diagnose later, and then wonder why the client does not buy. This creates the classic square-peg-in-a-round-hole problem. The salesperson has a product or service, so they try to force it into the buyer's situation whether it fits or not. In B2B sales, this damages credibility. In Japan, it can be even more harmful because trust, reputation, and long-term relationships are central to business development. Once a buyer feels burned, they may not complain loudly, but they will disappear quietly. The salesperson then moves on to the next prospect and repeats the same failure. That is not selling. That is professional self-sabotage. Do now: Stop presenting until you can clearly state the buyer's problem, desired outcome, decision criteria, and reason to act now. How can salespeople stop making excuses and improve? Salespeople stop making excuses by studying, applying the knowledge, reviewing the result, and repeating that cycle without pause. Improvement comes from disciplined practice, not from waiting for better market conditions. A salesperson cannot control currency movements, competitor pricing, government policy, procurement rules, or the global economy. They can control preparation, questioning skill, listening quality, follow-up speed, product knowledge, confidence, and personal learning. That shift in focus is liberating. It takes the salesperson out of victim mode and puts them back in charge of their own progress. In Japan, where clients often reward reliability and persistence, professional consistency becomes a competitive advantage. Do now: Build a weekly improvement loop: study one skill, practise it in live calls, review what happened, and adjust. Conclusion There are always external factors in sales. The boss may be difficult, the market may be shifting, the yen may be moving, pricing may be under pressure, and competitors may be aggressive. None of that removes the salesperson's responsibility to become better. The modern salesperson has access to more learning resources than ever before. The real question is whether they will use them. No more excuses. Study the craft, apply the knowledge, keep improving, and become the professional your clients deserve. Meta description: Learn why salespeople in Japan must stop making excuses, study the craft, ask better questions, listen deeply, and sell professionally. Keywords: sales in Japan, no excuses in sales, professional selling, sales training Japan, consultative sales FAQs Why do salespeople blame external factors? Salespeople blame external factors because it protects them from admitting their own skills need work. Market conditions matter, but weak questioning, poor listening, and bad follow-up are within the salesperson's control. What is the most important sales skill to improve first? The most important skill to improve first is questioning. Better questions reveal the buyer's real needs, priorities, barriers, and decision process. Why is product pitching a problem in sales? Product pitching is a problem when it happens before the salesperson understands the buyer's situation. Without diagnosis, the pitch may be irrelevant or feel pushy. How can salespeople improve consistently? Salespeople improve by studying, applying, reviewing, and repeating. Daily learning and deliberate practice turn sales from guesswork into a professional discipline. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021 and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Jelang laga semifinal AFF U-19 2026, Timnas Indonesia U-19 melakukan latihan intensif untuk mematangkan strategi menghadapi Australia. Pelatih Nova Arianto menekankan disiplin dan keberanian pemain agar siap tampil maksimal.

Most leaders think they are good communicators, but that confidence is often built on a dangerous assumption. They believe communication means telling people what they think, what they want, and what should happen next. Real leadership communication is more demanding. It requires self-awareness, context, listening, empathy, emotional control, cultural intelligence, and the ability to create shared understanding. In Japan, Australia, the United States, Europe, and across Asia-Pacific, leaders now operate in workplaces overloaded with messages, meetings, dashboards, chat platforms, and cross-cultural misunderstanding. The leader's communication quality shapes trust, motivation, execution, and culture. What makes leadership communication more than just talking? Leadership communication is not one-way instruction; it is the disciplined creation of shared meaning. Leaders must understand their own assumptions and the listener's viewpoint before expecting action. Many bosses reduce complex ideas into headlines because they are busy. They skip background, context, and the "why," then wonder why people misunderstand or resist. Good communication begins with self-awareness. What assumptions am I making? What does the listener already believe? What vocabulary, cultural expectation, or past experience will shape how they hear me? In bilingual Japan workplaces, the gap can be even wider when English directness meets Japanese indirectness. Do now: Before giving an instruction, ask yourself, "What context does this person need in order to understand the real meaning?" Why should leaders listen before giving advice? Leaders should listen first because advice given too early often solves the wrong problem. The most important information may be hidden in what is not being said. Busy leaders often hear a fragment of an issue and leap into solution mode. That feels efficient, but it can silence the team and waste insight. Real listening means hearing words, tone, hesitation, emotion, and context. It also means resisting the temptation to show off experience or intelligence. Employees are more motivated when they feel the boss has genuinely heard them. In modern organisations, the leader no longer has a monopoly on ideas, expertise, or local knowledge. Do now: Listen for the unsaid message before offering advice. Ask, "What else should I understand before I respond?" How can leaders build an open communication culture? Leaders build an open communication culture by making it safe for many ideas to emerge, not just the boss's preferred opinion. Strong leaders welcome challenge; weak leaders demand agreement. A creative workplace needs more than slogans about innovation. It needs leaders who can throw hierarchy, status, and power out the window when ideas are being discussed. This matters in startups, multinationals, SMEs, professional services firms, and traditional Japanese companies where rank can easily silence junior talent. Open communication allows "a hundred flowers" of ideas to bloom, but it requires confidence from the boss. Leaders who are insecure often close discussion too early. Do now: In your next meeting, speak last on one important topic and invite the quietest person to contribute first. Why is empathetic listening the highest communication skill? Empathetic listening is the highest communication skill because it hears the person behind the words. It uses ears, eyes, and emotional awareness to understand what really matters. Empathetic listening means sensing the "how" of what is being said, not just capturing the literal message. Is the person anxious, hesitant, frustrated, embarrassed, or quietly enthusiastic? Are they withholding something because of hierarchy, face-saving, language limitations, or fear of being judged? This is especially important in Japan, where communication may be indirect and context-heavy. Leaders who listen empathetically can respond to the real issue rather than the surface-level statement. Do now: Watch tone, pace, facial expression, silence, and energy. Then check gently: "Is there something else behind this that we should discuss?" How does trust affect leadership communication? Trust determines whether the team receives the leader's message honestly or suspiciously. Communication is filtered through the leader's consistency, integrity, follow-through, and transparency. A leader cannot suddenly demand trust during a crisis. Trust is built layer by layer, through repeated behaviour. When the boss says one thing and does another, the team learns to discount the message. When the leader explains decisions clearly, follows through on commitments, and communicates bad news honestly, people listen differently. In any organisation, the grapevine becomes powerful when formal communication is weak, slow, or unbelievable. Rumours fill the vacuum leaders leave behind. Do now: Communicate early and consistently. If you do not provide the truth, the grapevine will provide a substitute. Why do leaders need to control emotional communication? Leaders must control anger, rage, disappointment, and irritability because these emotions communicate faster than words. Once released, the damage is difficult to reverse. A boss may believe they are simply "being direct," but the team may experience the moment as intimidation, humiliation, or instability. Emotional sparks are often selfish because they focus on the leader's inner turmoil rather than the listener's needs. In high-pressure environments, leaders need discipline before speaking. The rule is simple but difficult: speak to others as they want to be spoken to. This does not mean avoiding hard conversations. It means choosing clarity over emotional discharge. Do now: When emotionally triggered, pause before speaking. Ask, "Will this help the person understand, or will it simply release my frustration?" How does organisational culture shape communication? Leaders communicate inside the culture they create, and that culture determines how messages are interpreted. A trust-based culture receives communication differently from a fear-based culture. Every message has context. A short instruction from a trusted leader may feel clear and efficient. The same instruction from a volatile or political leader may feel threatening or manipulative. Communication is not just words; it is energy, action, sincerity, and intention. People watch what leaders do every day and compare it with what they say. This is why culture and communication cannot be separated. The leader's behaviour becomes the organisation's communication standard. Do now: Audit the gap between what you say and what your team sees you do. That gap is your real communication problem. Why is "my way or the highway" outdated leadership? The "my way only" leadership style is outdated because modern teams need understanding, inclusion, and shared ownership. The leader still decides, but better decisions come from first understanding the people affected. Command-and-control communication may feel decisive, but it often produces compliance without commitment. Employees today expect to understand the purpose behind decisions. They also bring expertise, customer knowledge, technical detail, and cultural insight the boss may not have. In Japan, where harmony and hierarchy can suppress open disagreement, leaders must work even harder to draw out real views. Seeking to understand subordinates first does not weaken authority. It improves judgement. Do now: Before finalising a decision, ask, "What am I missing from the people closest to the work?" Final summary Good leadership communication is not natural talent or polished talking. It is a set of disciplined habits: self-awareness, listening first, matching the listener's wavelength, creating open culture, listening empathetically, controlling emotion, building trust, communicating continuously, and rejecting "my way only" thinking. The uncomfortable truth is that poor communication usually starts with the leader. If people do not understand the why, context, priority, or expected action, leaders should not simply blame the listener. They should improve the message, the timing, the feedback loop, and their own listening. FAQs Are most leaders as good at communication as they think? No, many leaders overestimate their communication skill because they focus on speaking rather than understanding. Good communication requires the listener to receive, interpret, and act on the message correctly. Why is context important in leadership communication? Context explains the "why" behind the message. Without context, employees may hear the instruction but misunderstand the priority, purpose, or expected result. What is the role of empathy in communication? Empathy helps leaders understand what people feel, fear, avoid, and value. It allows the boss to tune into the human reality behind the work issue. Why is the grapevine so powerful? The grapevine becomes powerful when leaders leave an information vacuum. If formal communication is slow, vague, or untrusted, rumours and speculation take over. How can leaders improve immediately? Leaders can improve immediately by listening longer, speaking with more context, checking understanding, and controlling emotional reactions. These habits build trust faster than polished speeches. Quick actions for leaders Explain the "why," not just the task. Listen before giving advice. Invite ideas from different levels of the organisation. Match vocabulary and communication style to the listener. Watch for what is not being said. Communicate continuously to prevent rumour gaps. Control anger before speaking. Replace "my way" with "help me understand your view first." Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021, and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers: Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery, along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

A Genial, em parceria com a Quaest divulgou hoje mais uma atualização da pesquisa com a aprovação do governo e a intenção de voto para as eleições presidenciais. Neste episódio do PodQuaest, a jornalista Denise Barbosa conversa com o diretor de inteligência da Quaest, Guilherme Russo e com o analista da Fatto Inteligência Política, Bruno Rizzi. Confira a pesquisa completa aqui: https://lp.genialinvestimentos.com.br/pesquisas-genial-quaest/

No podcast ‘Notícia No Seu Tempo’, confira em áudio as principais notícias da edição impressa do jornal ‘O Estado de S.Paulo’ desta quarta-feira (10/06/2026): O banqueiro Daniel Vorcaro mudou sua segunda proposta de delação premiada e passou a tratar os pagamentos ao senador Ciro Nogueira (PP-PI) como propina, de acordo com pessoas que acompanham as negociações. Procurado, o senador não se manifestou. Na primeira tentativa de delação, dono do Banco Master disse apenas que bancou benesses ao senador, como viagens e festas, por sua “relação de amizade”. Essa proposta foi rejeitada por PF e PGR. Agora, com novo advogado, Vorcaro passou a narrar os repasses como uma tentativa de cooptação do senador para defesa dos seus interesses. Ciro Nogueira recebia de Vorcaro mesada de R$ 300 mil, que pode ter chegado a R$ 500 mil, diz a PF. Vorcaro chamou Ciro de “amigo de vida”. De acordo com pessoas que participam da negociação, a segunda proposta de delação endureceu as menções a fatos criminosos e incluiu novas informações. Essa proposta está sob análise da PF e da PGR. Política: TSE adia definição sobre veto a pesquisa Economia: Apesar de decisão da Justiça, Aneel homologa megaleilão de energia Metrópole: Suspeitos de lavagem de MC Ryan eram parceiros de ‘bets gigantes’ Internacional: EUA atacam Irã após Trump acusar país de derrubar helicóptero perto de OrmuzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Being ghosted in sales feels modern, but the problem is ancient. You meet someone at a networking event, have a positive conversation, follow up politely and then hear nothing but crickets. The danger is not only losing the opportunity. The greater risk is either giving up too early or following up so badly that you create brand damage. Professional salespeople need a follow-up rhythm that is persistent, respectful and defensible.  Why do buyers ghost salespeople after a good conversation? Buyers often ghost salespeople because they are overwhelmed, distracted or drowning in messages, not necessarily because they lied about being interested. The professional response is to assume the buyer is busy before assuming bad intent. Executives, managers and business owners receive a tsunami of emails, LinkedIn messages, calendar alerts, Teams notifications, Slack pings and social media updates every day. In Japan, the United States, Europe and across Asia-Pacific, post-pandemic hybrid work has increased digital noise and lowered tolerance for poor follow-up. Younger professionals are also often more text-based because written messages reduce confrontation and create an easy escape route: no reply. The problem is that no sales come from silence. Do now: Treat ghosting as a signal to follow up better, not as permission to disappear. Should salespeople keep following up after no response? Salespeople should keep following up if they genuinely believe they can help the buyer, but the tone must be respectful and benefit-led. Persistence is professional only when it serves the buyer. A second follow-up should acknowledge the buyer's busy schedule and apologise for adding to their inbox. Then it should restate the business benefit clearly. This protects the salesperson from sounding like a pest because the reason for the contact is not desperation, commission or pressure. The reason is value. For B2B sales teams, SMEs and multinational account managers, the question is simple: can this solution help the client improve revenue, productivity, leadership, customer retention or competitive performance? If yes, follow-up is part of service. Do now: In the second email, write briefly, apologise for the inbox intrusion and restate the buyer-centred benefit. How many follow-up emails are reasonable before moving on? Four thoughtful follow-ups are reasonable before concluding that silence probably means no. After that, the salesperson should move on and invest energy in a better buyer. The first message follows the original conversation. The second message politely restates the value. The third can use a slightly different version of the same buyer-focused message. The fourth should be short, unobtrusive and easy to answer. Dean Jackson's famous nine-word email formula is useful here: "Are you still interested in doing something with…?" The blank can reference the solution, business issue or opportunity discussed. This works because it is brief, non-threatening and forces a simple decision. Do now: Build a four-touch follow-up sequence before the meeting, not while emotionally reacting to silence. What should salespeople write in a follow-up email? Salespeople should write follow-up emails that are short, personal and anchored in the buyer's benefit. The goal is not to shame the buyer into replying, but to make responding easy. Forwarding the previous email can be useful, but it can also feel like a subtle accusation: "I wrote to you, and you ignored me." A stronger message starts with humanity. One useful habit is to begin with "Thanks…" because it reminds the salesperson to acknowledge the person before the business point. Another practical technique is to use the buyer's personal name as the subject line. "Tanaka san" or "Taro san" feels more human and lighter than a heavy corporate subject such as "Dale Carnegie Training Tokyo Proposal Follow-Up." Do now: Use the buyer's name, open with thanks and make the message easy to read in under 30 seconds. How can salespeople avoid damaging the brand with follow-up? Salespeople avoid brand damage by making every follow-up defensible, polite and connected to helping the buyer succeed. The buyer should feel pursued professionally, not pestered selfishly. People dislike spam because it is irrelevant, impersonal and endless. Sales follow-up becomes dangerous when it feels the same. The salesperson's defence is a clear service mindset: "My commitment is to help your business succeed, and I wanted to make sure you had the option to consider whether this makes sense." That framing works across Japanese business culture, Western B2B sales and relationship-based markets because it respects choice while demonstrating responsibility. The buyer can still say no, but the seller has not abandoned them prematurely. Do now: Prepare your explanation for follow-up before anyone challenges you on it. What should salespeople say when criticised for too much follow-up? Salespeople should calmly explain that consistent follow-up is part of serving customers properly. The answer must be prepared in advance because improvising under criticism often sounds defensive. A strong response might be: "I am sure you teach your own sales team the importance of serving customers, and that means doing the follow-up consistently and properly. That is why you are hearing from me. We are here to help your business beat your rivals and do better." This is a powerful reframe. Many executives privately wish their own salespeople were more persistent, organised and dedicated. The key is confidence without arrogance. The seller is not apologising for professionalism; they are explaining it. Do now: Write and rehearse your follow-up pushback response so it sounds natural, calm and buyer-centred. Conclusion: When does ghosting mean no? Ghosting does not automatically mean no after the first unanswered email. It may mean the buyer is busy, distracted, overwhelmed or buried under digital noise. The professional salesperson keeps going with tact, humility and a clear business reason. After four follow-ups, however, silence is probably the answer. At that point, move on and find a new buyer. The rule is simple: always allow the buyer to say "no" for themselves. Do not second-guess them by failing to follow up. Equally, do not damage your brand by chasing forever. FAQs Is being ghosted in sales always a rejection? No, being ghosted often means the buyer is overloaded, distracted or has lost track of the message. Salespeople should assume busyness first and rejection later. What is the best subject line for a follow-up email? A personal name is often the strongest subject line because it feels human and easy to open. For Japanese buyers, using polite forms such as "Tanaka san" can be appropriate depending on the relationship. How many times should I follow up with a buyer? Four respectful follow-ups are a practical limit before treating silence as a no. After that, the salesperson should move on to better-qualified opportunities. What should I say if a buyer complains about my follow-up? Explain that your follow-up is based on helping their business and giving them the option to decide. Keep the tone calm, respectful and focused on value. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Você está cobrando o uso de IA do seu time, mas tem certeza de que eles estão aprendendo com isso, ou só acelerando a entrega? Neste episódio, recebemos André Luis Guimarães Santos e Ângela Cláudia Martin Duarte, Heads de Operações, e Hammer Lage, Head de Tecnologia, todos da dti digtal. Eles debatem o que realmente muda na gestão quando a IA entra nos times, por que tratar a ferramenta apenas como ganho de performance é um erro, e como cultivar senso crítico em profissionais que já chegam ao mercado com IA na veia. Ficou curioso? Então, dê o play!Assuntos abordados:Liderança jardineira;Inteligência aumentada;Resistência à IA;Relatório DORA;Senso crítico;Dev júnior e IA;Agentes de IA;Cultura de aprendizado.Links importantes:NewsletterDúvidas? Nos mande pelo LinkedinContato:  osagilistas@dtidigital.com.brOs Agilistas é uma iniciativa da dti digital, uma empresa WPP #liderança

The Presenter's Dilemma The presenter's dilemma is simple: should we build the talk around slides, or build the slides around the message? Too many business presentations begin with recycled decks, clever visuals, and a desperate slide shuffle. The better path starts with one clear message, a specific audience, and stories that make the idea memorable. Should presenters start by building slides? No, presenters should not start by building slides; they should start by deciding what they want the audience to know, believe, and remember. A collage of slides is not a message. The warm embrace of an existing deck is tempting. We plunder old PowerPoint files, pull in favourite charts, add new content, and then wonder why the presentation feels like a beast with too many limbs. In Japan, Australia, the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific corporate settings, executives often equate slides with preparation. That is the trap. Slides are support tools, not the thinking itself. Before any visual appears, the speaker must boil the subject down to one pungent, crystal-clear message. Do now: Write the central message in one sentence before opening PowerPoint, Keynote, Google Slides, or Canva. How do you choose the right message for a presentation? Choose the right message by understanding who will be in the audience and what will hit the bullseye for them.The best message is not always the speaker's favourite message. The topic gives a clue, but the audience decides the angle. Ask the organiser who usually attends, which companies are registered, what roles are represented, and what outcomes they expect. A talk for CFOs at Toyota, Rakuten, Salesforce, or a Japanese SME should not sound identical to a talk for HR leaders, sales managers, investors, or startup founders. In B2B presentations, audience intelligence changes everything: examples, story selection, data points, objections, and the final call to action. Do now: Get audience intelligence early. Then choose the message most likely to matter to those specific listeners. Why are stories more powerful than raw data in presentations? Stories are more powerful than raw data because they give information context, colour, and human meaning. Data informs, but stories make people care. Numbers can be inert. A spreadsheet, table, or statistic may be accurate and still leave the audience cold. When data is wrapped inside a story, people can visualise the point. That is why presenters translate measurements into familiar comparisons, such as football fields, daily costs, customer time saved, or missed revenue per month. In sales presentations, investor pitches, leadership briefings, and training sessions, the story turns abstract information into something the audience can feel and remember. Do now: For every major data point, ask: "What story, person, image, or comparison will make this real?" How many slides should a business presentation use? A business presentation should use only the slides that strengthen the message; sometimes that means very few slides or even none. The goal is impact, not slide volume. Video meetings make this especially important. In Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, and Webex presentations, screen sharing often shrinks the speaker into a tiny box while the slides dominate the screen. If the speaker's personal brand, leadership presence, or executive credibility matters, that can be a poor trade. A senior leader presenting to top management may create more impact by using fewer visuals and speaking directly into the camera. This keeps attention on the human being, not the slide machinery. Do now: Cut every slide that competes with your presence rather than amplifying your point. How can speakers tell stories without relying on visuals? Speakers can tell stories without visuals by painting a scene with time, place, people, and sensory detail. A well-told story creates its own screen inside the audience's mind. Instead of showing a snowy New York image, say it was three years ago, heavy snow was falling, and the streets around Rockefeller Center were white. Add a recognisable person, such as Warren Buffett leaving the building in a thick coat and long scarf, and the audience starts building the scene themselves. This works in Japan, Australia, the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific because humans are wired for narrative. The speaker becomes the focus, not the slide deck. Do now: Build stories with four anchors: when it happened, where it happened, who was there, and what changed. When should presenters use slides? Presenters should use slides when the visual can be processed quickly and supports the story rather than replacing it. A good slide earns its place in about one second. Photographs with no words can work beautifully because they trigger curiosity and allow the speaker to explain the symbolism. Dense text, detailed spreadsheets, complex graphs, and tables of numbers often do the opposite. They drag attention away from the presenter and force the audience to read instead of listen. In executive communication, keynote speaking, sales enablement, and leadership presentations, slides should be visual allies. They should never become the main act while the speaker becomes the narrator of a document. Do now: Prefer simple visuals, strong photographs, and story-led explanations over text-heavy slide dumps. Conclusion: How should presenters solve the presenter's dilemma? The presenter's dilemma is solved by changing the order of preparation. First, know the audience. Second, define the one message. Third, choose stories and examples. Fourth, decide whether slides are needed at all. Finally, build only the visuals that help the audience understand and remember. When your personal and professional brand is on display, these choices matter. A recycled slide deck may feel efficient, but it can bury the message. A story-led presentation keeps the spotlight where it belongs: on the speaker, the audience, and the idea that needs to land. Meta description: Learn how to solve the presenter's dilemma by choosing message-first storytelling over slide-heavy business presentations. Keywords: presentation slides, business presentations, storytelling, executive communication, presentation structure FAQs Should I reuse old slides for a new presentation? You can reuse old slides only after you have defined the new audience, message, and story. Starting with old slides often creates a patchwork presentation. What is the biggest mistake presenters make with slides? The biggest mistake is treating slides as the presentation instead of support for the message. The speaker, not the deck, should carry the impact. Are stories better than data in presentations? Stories and data work best together, but stories give data context and meaning. Raw numbers often need a human example or familiar comparison to become memorable. Should I use slides in a video presentation? Use fewer slides in video presentations when your presence and eye contact matter. Screen sharing can reduce the speaker to a small box and weaken impact. What kind of slides work best? Simple visual slides, especially strong photographs with little or no text, often work best. They are easy to process and leave room for the speaker's story. Author bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021 and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Novo episódio? Sério? Fala turma, como é que vocês estão? O nosso encontro de hoje é uma meditação sobre a aceitação de nossas circunstâncias. Não esquece de compartilhar e de deixar um comentário se gostou do episódio.

Sales conversations need structure, not spaghetti. In Japan especially, the best salespeople do not simply pitch, push and hope. They build bridges between each phase of the buyer conversation: rapport, permission to ask questions, solution presentation, objection handling and the final close. These bridges make the sales call feel natural, respectful and useful for the client. For executives, sales leaders and B2B professionals, the real lesson is simple: a sales process is not just a checklist. It is a conversation road map. When each transition is handled smoothly, the buyer feels understood rather than sold to. Why do sales conversations need bridges? Sales conversations need bridges because buyers rarely move smoothly from greeting to decision without guidance. A bridge is the short phrase, question or transition that helps the buyer follow the logic of the meeting. In Japan, where trust, politeness and context matter deeply in business, these bridges are even more important. A salesperson who jumps too quickly into the pitch can feel abrupt, especially compared with the slower relationship-building style common in Japanese B2B sales. In the US, a direct "Let's get down to business" approach may be accepted. In Japan, the same move can miss the social rhythm that helps buyers relax and open up. Do now: Map your sales call into phases and write one clear bridge sentence between each phase. How should salespeople start a meeting in Japan? Salespeople in Japan should start by using small talk, meishi and respectful observation to build trust before discussing business. The beginning of the meeting is not wasted time; it is the first sales bridge. Business cards remain a gold mine in Japan. The buyer's meishi can reveal their title, division, company structure, location, seniority and sometimes even regional clues in their name. A skilled salesperson uses these details naturally. For example, commenting politely on a rare kanji reading or asking about the buyer's role can start a human conversation. This is different from many Western business settings, where business cards have become less central and meetings often begin more transactionally. Do now: Treat the first three minutes as a trust-building phase, not an awkward warm-up. Why should salespeople ask permission before asking questions? Salespeople should ask permission because questioning the buyer can feel intrusive unless the purpose is clearly explained. In Japan, this bridge is vital because direct questioning may be seen as rude if handled poorly. Many Japanese salespeople avoid asking diagnostic questions and instead launch straight into the pitch. That creates a problem: without questions, the salesperson cannot know which solution matters. If a company has 155 training modules, products or services, presenting everything overwhelms the buyer. A better bridge is: "We may be able to help, but I am not sure yet. Would you mind if I asked a few questions so I can understand your situation?" This makes the questioning feel respectful and useful. Do now: Never interrogate. Ask permission, explain the benefit, then diagnose. How do you move from questions to the solution? The best bridge from questions to solution is a short confirmation that shows the buyer you listened. Before presenting, summarise the need and explain that you have narrowed the options. This is where many salespeople lose control of the conversation. They ask good questions, then dump too much information on the buyer. In B2B sales, especially with executives, SMEs and large Japanese firms, clarity beats quantity. A strong bridge sounds like: "Thank you, I now understand what you are looking for. Based on your priorities, I believe this solution fits best." This tells the buyer the pitch is not generic. It is selected for them. Do now: Present only the solution that matches the buyer's stated need. Leave the rest out. What is the best way to check buyer interest during the sales presentation? A trial close is the bridge that checks whether the buyer is following, interested and comfortable. The simple question "How does that sound so far?" can reveal confusion, hesitation or hidden objections. This is not a hard close. It is a conversational checkpoint. After explaining the feature, benefit, application and evidence, the salesperson pauses and lets the buyer react. In Japan, where buyers may avoid direct confrontation, these gentle checks are especially useful. They give the buyer permission to raise concerns without losing face. Compared with more aggressive American closing styles, this approach is low-pressure but still commercially effective. Do now: After each major solution point, ask a soft trial close before moving forward. How should salespeople handle price objections? Salespeople should bridge into objections by thanking the buyer and asking why they feel that way. The best response to "Your price is too high" is not a defence; it is curiosity. A calm answer might be: "Thank you. May I ask why you say that?" Then stop talking. Silence is powerful. The buyer may reveal they are comparing against a cheaper competitor, working with a fixed budget, unsure of value, or testing whether a discount is available. Each answer requires a different response. If the salesperson guesses, they may answer the wrong objection. In Japanese sales, where open disagreement can be subtle, this bridge helps uncover the real issue. Do now: Do not fight objections. Clarify them first, then answer the real concern. Conclusion: What should sales leaders do now? Sales leaders should train their teams to build bridges, not just deliver pitches. A strong sales call has a clear flow: rapport, permission, diagnosis, tailored solution, trial close, objection handling and final decision. Each phase needs a transition that feels natural to the buyer. For Japan-focused sales teams, this is especially important. Respectful pacing, small talk, meishi awareness, permission-based questioning and low-pressure closing all help buyers feel safe enough to engage. The goal is not to manipulate the conversation. The goal is to make it easier for the buyer to understand, trust and decide. Author bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including the best-sellers Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery and Japan Presentations Mastery, along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō, Purezen no Tatsujin, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery and Japan's Top Business Interviews, followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Carín León estrena su nuevo trabajo Muda: un disco donde vuelve a explorar el regional mexicano. Pero, ¿cómo ha conseguido este sonido regional globalizars? Muda es el ejemplo de cómo un sonido local puede llegar a ser internacional. 

Trocaram o nome do ovário policístico (e isso muda tudo)

Programas opensource têm vindo a ganhar protagonismo no mundo da IA, mas o que muda com este conceito que de inovador tem pouco.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Douglas Germano é daqueles artistas que fazem do samba uma ferramenta de memória, reflexão e resistência. Dono de uma obra importantes dentro da música brasileira contemporânea, ele construiu uma trajetória marcada pela força poética, pelo olhar atento às questões sociais e por uma profunda conexão com a tradição do samba sem jamais abrir mão da invenção. Pela próxima hora, você vai ouvir uma conversa sobre criação, ancestralidade, política, afetos, o papel do samba nos dias de hoje e os caminhos da música brasileira. Um encontro com um artista que entende a canção como documento do seu tempo, mas também como possibilidade de futuro.

"My career, I like to say, is about saving the world one word at a time." "I love team building. I love creating something from nothing or growing it further." "Creating connection and engagement with people" is one of the hardest parts of leading remotely. "You need to show the vision, where you're going, and why that matters." "Leadership is really about unlocking the potential and power of those who report to you." Meghan Barstow is President of Edelman Japan, bringing a career defined by language, communications, adaptability and cross-cultural leadership. Her Japan story began thirty years earlier when she studied Japanese at Kansai Gaidai in Osaka after intensive language training in the United States. With an academic background in English literature and Japanese, she describes herself as "a woman who loves words," a phrase that neatly captures her professional journey. After university, Barstow returned to Japan through the JET Program, spending three years in rural Kagoshima as an ALT and CIR. That immersive experience deepened both her Japanese language capability and her understanding of regional Japan. She later worked for Hyogo Prefecture's business and cultural centre in Seattle, taught Japanese at a public high school, and returned to Tokyo to create business English textbooks before entering PR and communications through Adcom Group's Tri Media. Her career with Edelman began in Japan on the healthcare team when the office was still relatively small. She later moved to the United States, took time to hike the Pacific Crest Trail from Mexico to Canada, and rejoined Edelman in Washington, D.C., where she developed her leadership capabilities across client leadership, sector leadership and employee experience. Her long-held ambition was to return to Japan and lead an office. She eventually came back as President of Edelman Japan, taking on the challenge of leading more than seventy people during the COVID era, much of it remotely. Barstow's leadership context is shaped by global communications, Japanese cultural fluency, remote transformation, employee engagement, trust-building and organisational change. Her adaptability in Japan comes not from a single posting, but from repeated immersion, reinvention and a deep belief that words, trust and human connection sit at the centre of effective leadership. Meghan Barstow's leadership story is a study in language, mobility, resilience and change. As President of Edelman Japan, she leads an organisation at the intersection of communications, marketing, trust, earned attention and cultural transformation. Her path to Japan did not begin with the usual clichés of pop culture or food. Instead, it began with a love of travel, a willingness to take on difficult languages and a desire to build a career through communication. Her first deep experience of Japan came as a student at Kansai Gaidai in Osaka. Later, through the JET Program, she spent three years in rural Kagoshima, an experience that gave her more than language ability. It gave her the kind of cultural immersion that helps a foreign leader understand Japan beyond Tokyo boardrooms. She went on to work in cultural exchange, education, publishing and eventually PR, where she discovered that communications felt like her "calling." Barstow's return to Japan as Edelman's country leader came after significant leadership experience in the United States, particularly in Washington, D.C. Yet the move back was not simply a geographic transfer. She returned to a Japan office undergoing transformation, in an industry where the boundaries between PR, marketing, advertising, digital and corporate communications had become increasingly blurred. Edelman's value proposition, as she explains it, lies in being independent, family-owned, grounded in earned attention and differentiated by decades of research into trust through the Edelman Trust Barometer. Her biggest challenge was not only strategy. It was connection. She took on the role during COVID and had not met most of her employees face to face. Leading a team of more than seventy people remotely required deliberate communication, listening and repetition. She used all-staff business updates, weekly written roundups, one-on-one meetings, roundtables, strategy workshops and "strategy spotlight" sessions to make the direction tangible. In Japan, where uncertainty avoidance, consensus and nemawashi matter, remote transformation made alignment even harder. Barstow's approach to change management is grounded in clarity, role modelling and personal experience. She believes leaders must show the vision, explain why it matters, gain manager buy-in and give employees direct experiences of the new strategy. This is especially important in Japan, where change can feel risky because it moves people from competence into uncertainty. The challenge is not simply to announce direction, but to help people understand it emotionally and practically. Her leadership style is also shaped by trust. She recognises that trust in Japan is hard-won, takes time and becomes even more difficult in a remote environment. She sees consistency, integrity, care and communication as central to building it. Employee engagement surveys, business performance metrics and informal feedback help her understand whether the organisation is moving, but she also recognises that Japanese survey responses can be culturally restrained. For her, improvement over time matters more than absolute scores. Her view of leadership is ultimately humble and enabling. She sees the leader's role not as personal heroics, but as unlocking the potential of others. Sometimes the leader stands in front, showing the way. Sometimes beside people, supporting them step by step. Sometimes behind them, cheering them forward. For foreign executives in Japan, her lesson is clear: the fundamentals of leadership may be universal, but the path to alignment, buy-in and trust requires patience, listening, nemawashi and respect for how decisions are actually made. Q&A Summary What makes leadership in Japan unique? Leadership in Japan requires a careful balance between hierarchy and bottom-up consensus. Meghan Barstow observes that people may defer to the leader and expect direction, while also expecting decisions to emerge through wider involvement and alignment. This creates a leadership paradox for foreign executives. They must provide vision and direction without bypassing the consensus-building process that helps people feel ownership. Japan's business culture places high value on listening, patience, nemawashi and relationship-based trust. Leaders need to spend more time preparing the ground before pushing major initiatives forward. This is not simply politeness. It is a practical requirement for gaining commitment and avoiding resistance. In Barstow's experience, one-on-one listening, roundtables and repeated communication are essential to helping people understand both the logic and emotional meaning of change. Why do global executives struggle? Global executives often struggle in Japan because they underestimate how much time alignment takes. In faster-moving Western environments, a leader may announce a strategy and expect the organisation to move. In Japan, the message may need to be repeated, discussed, localised and validated through multiple channels before people fully commit. Barstow's own challenge was intensified by remote work. She was leading more than seventy people, yet had not met most of them face to face. That made trust-building, employee engagement and emotional connection much harder. Global executives may also misread employee engagement data, because Japanese respondents often score more conservatively than employees in other markets. Barstow therefore focuses less on comparing Japan with global averages and more on whether the organisation is improving over time. Is Japan truly risk-averse? Japan is often described as risk-averse, but Barstow's experience suggests the issue is more nuanced. The deeper challenge is uncertainty avoidance. People may hesitate when change pushes them out of a known area of competence into a new environment where they may make mistakes or lose face. This is particularly important in Japan's quality-conscious, defect-sensitive culture. For leaders, the answer is not to criticise caution. It is to reduce uncertainty through explanation, involvement, repetition and evidence of progress. Barstow emphasises the importance of showing the vision, explaining why it matters and giving people personal experiences of the change. When employees see that a new way of working succeeds with clients or improves outcomes, the change becomes real rather than abstract. What leadership style actually works? Barstow's leadership style combines strategic clarity, listening, humility and persistence. She began her tenure by preserving existing communication rhythms, then spent her first months listening through one-on-ones and roundtables. After understanding what employees wanted and needed, she built a communication and engagement plan around strategy, business updates and practical learning. She also recognises the importance of the "frozen middle" — the layer of managers who can either accelerate or block transformation. In Japan, leaders need managers to champion the change, role model new behaviours and translate strategy into daily practice. A leadership style that works is therefore not only top-down. It is distributed, repeated and reinforced through many small touchpoints. How can technology help? Technology can support leadership, but it cannot replace human trust. Barstow used remote platforms, written updates, engagement dashboards, survey tools and virtual roundtables to maintain communication during COVID. These tools created visibility when informal office interactions disappeared. Written communication also helped employees absorb messages at their own pace, especially in a multilingual environment. Technology can also improve decision intelligence by giving leaders more data about employee engagement, business performance and organisational change. In the future, tools such as digital twins of organisational workflows could help leaders model bottlenecks, workload pressures or collaboration patterns. However, Barstow's experience shows that technology only helps when paired with listening, empathy and human interpretation. Does language proficiency matter? Language proficiency matters, but cultural fluency matters even more. Barstow's Japanese study, rural JET Program experience and repeated periods living and working in Japan gave her a deeper foundation than a short-term expatriate assignment would have provided. Her language background helped her connect with Japan, but her leadership effectiveness also comes from understanding context, patience and communication style. She also recognises that English can be challenging in remote settings, even for capable bilingual professionals. Written updates, clear repetition and structured communication help ensure people can process complex information. For foreign leaders, language ability is valuable, but the bigger issue is whether employees feel understood, respected and included. What's the ultimate leadership lesson? The ultimate leadership lesson from Barstow's experience is that leadership is about unlocking the potential and power of others. She does not see leadership as being centred on the leader's ego. Rather, it is about helping people grow, strengthening organisational capability and creating conditions where others can succeed. Her definition of leadership is flexible. Sometimes leaders must lead from the front, showing the way. Sometimes they stand side by side, supporting people closely. Sometimes they lead from behind, encouraging and cheering others forward. In Japan, the most effective leaders combine vision with patience, courage with humility and strategy with the deep human work of trust-building. Author Credentials Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have also been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). In addition to his books, Greg publishes daily blogs on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, offering practical insights on leadership, communication, and Japanese business culture. He is also the host of six weekly podcasts, including The Leadership Japan Series, The Sales Japan Series, The Presentations Japan Series, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews. On YouTube, he produces three weekly shows — The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews — which have become leading resources for executives seeking strategies for success in Japan.

Este conteúdo é um trecho do nosso episódio: “#349 - Multilixo: gestão de resíduos com previsibilidade e controle operacional”.Nele, Marcelo Kotaki, CIO da Multilixo, explica como o desenvolvimento de uma plataforma própria revolucionou completamente a gestão operacional da empresa. Ele detalha a transição do controle em papel para um sistema integrado com torre de controle logística, rastreamento em tempo real e otimização de rotas que facilita a vida dos operadores. Ficou curioso? Então, dê o play!Assuntos abordados:Plataforma Multimais;Rastreamento logístico;Roteirização inteligente;Economia circular.Links importantes:NewsletterDúvidas? Nos mande pelo LinkedinContato:  osagilistas@dtidigital.com.brOs Agilistas é uma iniciativa da dti digital, uma empresa WPP #eficienciaoperacional

As finais começaram e não sem emoção. Na NBB o Franca tinha tudo para fechar em 3 a 0 e se sagrar pentacampeão, mas o terceiro jogo acabou tendo uma mudança de maré. Já na NBA, tivemos apenas o primeiro jogo até aqui e com muita variação também e, mesmo jogando em San Antonio, o Knicks conseguiu virar. Mas uma coisa por vez, claro. Primeiro a NBB, com as finais entre Franca e Pinheiros. Pinheiros chegou mais rápido a final e sofrendo menos, enquanto o Franca teve ralar e chegou ao final do quinto jogo super apertado. Mas não levou nada disso para a final e chegou se garantindo. Jogando no Pedrocão ganhou o primeiro jogo com tranquilidade. O segundo e terceiro jogos foram no Ginásio do Ibirapuera, o que foi ótimo, pois tivemos a oportunidade de ver um grande casa lotar. E os jogos foram decididos nos detalhes. Uma loucura a tensão no final dos dois jogos. No primeiro Franca levou a melhor e no segundo, para não levar a varrida, o Pinheiros venceu, mas deu a bola do jogo para o Franca com 6 segundos, dando chance para um arremesso de 3 do Georginho. Por sorte dos paulistanos, a bola não caiu e teremos jogo 4. Na NBA falamos do último jogo entre Spurs e OKC antes de falar da final. E era importante falar pois esta não era a temporada para o Spurs chegar na final. Não ainda. E muito passava por terem de vencer os atuais campeões para chegar a final. A gente sabia que não seria fácil, mas San Antonio ainda varia muito durante os jogos, e OKC, sem o peso de ter de ser campeão que tinham no ano passado, parecia que conseguiria se impor antes da série começar. Ledo engano e fica claro que um time com o Wemby não vai poder ser descartado. Fica a dúvida do que acontece agora com o OKC para a próxima temporada. Muda-se algo? Como fica o cap? E com quem renovar? O que eles sabem é que agora, para chegar na final ano que vem, vão ter de passar por um San Antonio Spurs bem mais preparado e tarimbado. Só que a final é um outro monstro, muito diferente do jogo anterior. E agora eles precisam enfrentar um Knicks embalado, confiante e descansado. O Knicks sabem que se eles quiserem ser campeões este é o ano para conseguir. Ano que vem, o próprio leste vai ser muito diferente e chegar a uma final de novo não vai ter um caminho tão "fácil" como tiveram este ano. Mas ainda nas variações de intensidade e cansaço, o time nova yorkino soube se aproveitar quando importava e venceu o primeiro jogo, jogando fora de casa. Falamos também da semana da LBF, da WNBA, da situação absurda do time da Kamilla, o Sky, do volei, do cinema, do tenis e de muito mais. Então não perde tempo, aperta o play e vem com a gente!

Uma decisão do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) trouxe mudanças importantes para milhares de trabalhadores que atuam em atividades insalubres ou perigosas. Por seis votos a cinco, a Corte derrubou a exigência de idade mínima para a concessão da aposentadoria especial, regra que havia sido criada pela Reforma da Previdência de 2019. Com o entendimento firmado pelos ministros, volta a valer o critério baseado exclusivamente no tempo de exposição a agentes nocivos à saúde. Na prática, o trabalhador poderá solicitar a aposentadoria especial assim que completar o período mínimo exigido em atividade de risco, sem precisar atingir uma idade mínima. O tema foi abordado nesta sexta-feira (5) durante entrevista do advogado Odirlei de Oliveira ao programa Cruz de Malta Notícias. Segundo ele, a decisão representa uma mudança significativa para profissionais que passam anos expostos a condições prejudiciais à saúde e que, até então, precisavam aguardar o cumprimento da idade mínima estabelecida pela reforma. Pelas regras que voltam a ser aplicadas, o direito ao benefício é garantido conforme o tempo de exposição ao risco. Trabalhadores de atividades consideradas de alto risco, como mineração em subsolo, podem se aposentar após 15 anos de atividade. Para atividades de risco moderado, como mineração afastada da frente de serviço, o período exigido é de 20 anos. Já para profissionais da área da saúde, metalurgia, indústria, vigilância e outras atividades insalubres, o requisito continua sendo de 25 anos de exposição. Apesar da mudança nos critérios para concessão do benefício, o cálculo do valor da aposentadoria permanece o mesmo. O benefício continua sendo calculado com base em 60% da média salarial, acrescidos de 2% para cada ano de contribuição que ultrapassar o tempo mínimo exigido pela legislação. Os efeitos práticos da decisão ainda dependem da publicação oficial do acórdão e da definição dos detalhes de aplicação pelo Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social (INSS). Por isso, a orientação é que trabalhadores que atuam ou atuaram em condições insalubres mantenham organizada toda a documentação que comprove a exposição aos agentes nocivos, garantindo o reconhecimento do direito e a obtenção do melhor benefício possível. A decisão do STF é considerada uma vitória para categorias que desempenham atividades sob condições especiais e reforça o entendimento de que o desgaste causado pela exposição contínua a riscos deve ser levado em conta na concessão da aposentadoria.

$1 saved in waste is worth $2.86 in sales at a 35% margin. That's why getting efficient pays better than getting bigger.In this episode, Martin and Khalil walk through TIMWOODS, the lean manufacturing acronym for the 8 types of waste: Transportation, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproduction, Overprocessing, Defects, and Skills. They translate each one for contracting and service businesses, with examples from the back office, the shop, and the job site.Plus the Toyota Way forces underneath (Muri, Mura, Muda), and a 1% P&L exercise that surfaces the highest-impact fix before you chase new sales.Key Topics & Timestamps00:51 - Episode Intro03:40 - Profit Math and 1% Fixes09:30 - Transportation 11:44 - Inventory14:49 - Motion17:08 - Waiting19:04 - Overproduction 20:50 - Overprocessing25:56 - Defects29:45 - SkillsMemorable Quotes"Waste really is where your opportunity is." — Martin"Efficiency really is the elimination of waste in a process." — Martin"The more you can think about your business like a machine, the more success you're gonna have." — Khalil"Reality is it's either the system or it's you." — Khalil"Having the courage to delegate and trust people to get it done is absolutely necessary." — MartinKey TakeawaysDoubling sales doesn't pay the bills. At a thin margin, doubling the top line without fixing waste can sink the business faster than slow growth.A $1 of waste saved is worth far more in sales. At a 35% margin, $1 equals $2.86 in sales you don't have to chase to keep the same profit.Walk TIMWOODS through your business: Transportation, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproduction, Overprocessing, Defects, and Skills. Every category has waste hiding somewhere.Run a 1% sensitivity exercise on every line of your P&L. Whichever line moves profit the most when improved by 1% is the line worth attacking first.Mental context-switching is motion waste. Daily huddles, focused production meetings, and clear handoffs cut the brain-jumping that exhausts your team.Skills waste is on the owner. If your team has no way to surface what they see on site, you're paying for talent and ignoring it.Defects almost always trace back to the system or the owner. Before blaming an employee, ask whether the delegation was clear and the process is hard to do wrong.Resources⁠24 Things Guide⁠⁠15-Min Roadblock Call⁠⁠Quo⁠Build a business that runs without you. Explore our ⁠GrowthKits⁠Need marketing help? We recommend ⁠Benali⁠Need help with podcast production? We recommend ⁠Demandcast⁠More from Martin Holland⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠theprofitproblem.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠annealbc.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠   ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Email Martin⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Meet With Martin⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠More from Khalil⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠benali.com ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Email Khalil⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Meet With Khalil⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠More from The Cash Flow ContractorSubscribe to our⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube channel⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe to our ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Newsletter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Follow On Social:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠,⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠,⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠X(formerly Twitter)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Visit our ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Email⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ The Cashflow Contractor

A reforma tributária foi aprovada, e as mudanças que ela traz para quem trabalha com representação comercial são muitas. No Mercoscast 179, Gabriel Schulz, especialista em Direito Tributário, conversa com Miriele Veber e Afonso Tonelli para entender o que está por vir e o que essa mudança significa na rotina do representante. A conversa aborda o futuro do Simples Nacional e do Fator R, as possíveis mudanças no cálculo da comissão, o funcionamento do Simples Nacional Híbrido e como o representante pode se organizar para esse novo cenário tributário.

Entrepreneurs in Japan need many abilities, but three requirements sit above the rest: time mastery, delegation, and persuasive communication. Without these, the founder becomes the bottleneck, the team remains underdeveloped, and customers, investors, and employees lose confidence. Running a business in Japan is demanding because entrepreneurs must balance clients, cash flow, hiring, delivery, compliance, relationships, and reputation. The temptation is to do everything personally. That feels heroic, but it is usually a trap. Sustainable success comes from deciding what matters most, developing others, and inspiring people to follow. What are the top three requirements for entrepreneurs in Japan? The top three requirements for entrepreneurs in Japan are mastering time, cloning yourself through delegation, and persuading people through clear communication. These skills determine whether the founder scales the business or becomes trapped inside daily tasks. In Tokyo, Osaka, Fukuoka, Singapore, Sydney, London, and New York, entrepreneurs face the same brutal reality: there is always more to do than time available. Japan adds its own layers, including high client expectations, careful relationship-building, consensus decision-making, and a strong service culture. The entrepreneur who cannot control time, develop people, and communicate vision will struggle to grow beyond personal effort. These are not "soft skills." They are business survival skills. Do now: Audit your week against three questions: Am I controlling my time, building leverage through others, and inspiring people clearly? Why is time mastery so important for entrepreneurs? Time mastery matters because poor time control creates inefficiency, stress, wasted effort, and missed opportunities. Entrepreneurs often try to do everything, then wonder why they feel exhausted and stuck. The first discipline is priority control. A founder cannot complete every task every day, but they can complete the most important task. That simple principle changes the business rhythm. Instead of being dragged around by email, Slack, Line, client demands, admin, and interruptions, the entrepreneur chooses the number one priority and finishes it first. This applies to solopreneurs, SMEs, family businesses, professional services firms, startups, and country managers building new operations in Japan. Time is not just a calendar issue; it is a strategic resource. Do now: Start each day by naming the single most important business priority and completing it before moving to task two. Why do entrepreneurs become the bottleneck in their own business? Entrepreneurs become the bottleneck when every decision, task, and client issue must pass through them. This usually happens because they have not developed trusted people around them. Founders are often smart, fast, and impatient. That makes them dangerous to themselves. They can solve problems quickly, so they keep taking work back from the team. Over time, the organisation learns to wait for the boss. In Japan, where quality expectations are high and mistakes can damage trust, entrepreneurs may hesitate to delegate because they fear poor execution. But refusing to delegate creates a treadmill: the founder is always busy, the team never grows, and the business cannot scale. The entrepreneur's job is not to be the busiest person. It is to create leverage. Do now: Identify three recurring tasks that still depend on you and decide who could be trained to own them. How should entrepreneurs delegate without dumping work on people? Effective delegation is not dumping tasks; it is developing people through clear expectations, support, and ownership. If you simply throw work at someone and hope for excellence, disappointment is predictable. Delegation should begin with a proper conversation. Explain the task, the desired outcome, the standards, the deadline, the decision rights, and the support available. Most importantly, explain how the task helps the person grow. Talk in terms of their interests, not just your workload. This matters in Japanese workplaces because trust, role clarity, and mutual obligation influence performance. The delegatee needs to understand why the task matters, how success will be judged, and how it supports their development. That is how delegation becomes leadership rather than abdication. Do now: Before delegating, prepare the task outcome, success criteria, deadline, check-in rhythm, and growth benefit for the person receiving it. Why must entrepreneurs learn to inspire investors, staff, and clients? Entrepreneurs must inspire because investors, potential hires, existing staff, and clients all decide whether to trust the founder's direction. If the founder is unclear or unimpressive, people hesitate to follow. Persuasion is not manipulation. It is the ability to make the business vision, customer value, and next step clear. Investors want confidence. New staff want purpose. Existing staff want direction and recognition. Clients want reassurance that the company can solve their problem. In Japan, where reputation and trust carry enormous weight, a founder who communicates poorly weakens the brand. Being a tyrant may produce short-term compliance, but it rarely creates loyalty. Honey does better than vinegar when communicating with people. Do now: Practise explaining your business vision in one minute, three minutes, and ten minutes so you can adapt to investors, staff, and clients. Can entrepreneurs improve persuasive speaking on their own? Most entrepreneurs will not become strong communicators by hoping experience alone will fix the problem.Speaking, presenting, and inspiring others are trainable skills, and founders should treat them seriously. Entrepreneurs often invest in product development, accounting software, digital marketing, CRM systems, and legal advice, but avoid communication training. That is a mistake. A founder's ability to speak clearly affects fundraising, hiring, sales, partnerships, retention, and leadership. As of 2025, entrepreneurs also compete with polished online content, AI-generated messaging, video pitches, webinars, and investor decks, so vague communication stands out for the wrong reasons. The entrepreneur who learns to speak with structure, confidence, and warmth gains an advantage. Do now: Get training, coaching, or structured practice in presenting, storytelling, and persuasive communication instead of relying on trial and error. Conclusion Entrepreneurs in Japan need to master time, delegate properly, and inspire others. These three skills work together. Better time control creates space to train people. Better delegation creates leverage. Better communication attracts investors, reassures clients, and keeps good staff engaged. The founder who tries to do everything personally eventually becomes the constraint. The founder who prioritises, develops people, and communicates persuasively builds a business that can grow beyond their individual capacity. Meta description: Discover the top three requirements for Japan entrepreneurs: time mastery, effective delegation, and persuasive communication that inspires action. Keywords: Japan entrepreneur skills, time mastery, delegation, persuasive communication, business leadership Japan FAQs What skills do entrepreneurs in Japan need most? Entrepreneurs in Japan most need time mastery, delegation, and persuasive communication. These skills help founders prioritise, scale through people, and inspire investors, staff, and clients. Why is delegation difficult for entrepreneurs? Delegation is difficult because founders often believe they can do the work faster or better themselves. That may be true short term, but it prevents the team from growing and keeps the business dependent on the founder. How should entrepreneurs manage their time? Entrepreneurs should identify the most important business priority each day and complete it first. They cannot do everything every day, but they can make sure the highest-value task gets done. Why is persuasive communication important for founders? Persuasive communication helps founders win trust from investors, staff, clients, and partners. A clear, inspiring founder makes the business easier to believe in and follow. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021 and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Leadership communication is not just about giving instructions, sending emails, or making polished speeches. The real test is whether the message is received, understood, accepted, and acted upon correctly by the team. Many leaders assume that because they have said something, communication has happened. That is a dangerous assumption. In busy workplaces across Japan, Australia, the United States, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, employees are drowning in emails, Slack messages, Teams notifications, social media updates, policies, procedures, and constant information overload. When language differences are involved, especially English and Japanese, the risks multiply. Leaders must move from one-way broadcasting to interactive communication built on questioning, listening, and checking for understanding. Why does leadership communication often fail? Leadership communication fails when leaders confuse sending a message with creating shared understanding. A memo, email, meeting instruction, or executive monologue is only useful if the team actually receives, interprets, and applies it correctly. Many leaders fire content at their teams like a high-pressure hose, then move on to the next meeting. Later, they discover the task was not done, was done incorrectly, or veered off in a direction they never imagined. This is not always laziness or resistance. Often it is a communication failure. In Japanese workplaces, written English may be easier to process than rapid-fire spoken English, but written instructions can still be missed, skimmed, misunderstood, or buried under workload. Do now: After important communication, do not ask, "Did I send it?" Ask, "What did they understand, and what will they do next?" Why is one-way communication risky for leaders? One-way communication is risky because it gives the leader no reliable evidence that the message has landed.Broadcast communication may be efficient, but it is not always effective. Rules, regulations, standard operating procedures, policy memos, emails, chat posts, and presentation decks all have a place. They create records and help people review details later. However, they do not prove comprehension. The leader may believe the message is obvious because they wrote it clearly and sent it to everyone. The team may be distracted, overloaded, unsure, or reluctant to ask questions. In multinational Japan offices, this gap widens when instructions move between English and Japanese communication styles. Do now: Treat written communication as the start of the process, not the end. Build in questions, confirmation, and follow-up. How can leaders check whether people really understand? Leaders check understanding by asking clarifying questions and having team members explain the message back in their own words. A polite nod is not proof of comprehension. This is especially important in Japan, where people may avoid admitting confusion to protect face, preserve harmony, or avoid slowing down the meeting. Foreign executives working in English may also smile and nod through Japanese explanations they only partly understand. The solution is not to embarrass people with interrogation. It is to normalise clarification. Ask, "How do you interpret the priority?" "What is the first action?" or "Can we confirm the deadline and expected output?" These questions reduce expensive rework. Do now: Use feedback loops. Ask people to restate the decision, deadline, owner, and next step before everyone leaves the meeting. What are the five levels of listening in leadership? The five levels of listening are ignoring, pretending, selective listening, attentive listening, and empathetic listening.Leaders need to know which level they are really operating at, not which level they imagine they are using. At the lowest level, the leader ignores the speaker because their own thoughts take over. At the second level, they pretend to listen while preparing their clever response. At the third level, they listen selectively for agreement, resistance, or the answer they want. At the fourth level, they listen attentively, give full focus, and paraphrase what they heard. At the highest level, they listen empathetically, reading tone, emotion, hesitation, and what remains unsaid. Do now: In your next one-on-one, notice whether you are listening to understand or listening to reply. Why do leaders pretend to listen? Leaders pretend to listen when they look attentive but are mentally preparing their response, defence, story, or counterargument. The body may be in the conversation, but the mind has already left. This happens easily to busy managers and senior executives. A team member starts speaking, and one phrase triggers the leader's own experience, advice, warning, or disagreement. Suddenly the leader is no longer listening. They are preparing to lecture, correct, debate, or impress. In high-pressure workplaces, this habit is common because leaders feel responsible for having the answer. The problem is that employees notice when the boss is not truly present, and they often stop sharing useful information. Do now: Delay your response. Listen until the person finishes, pause, then paraphrase before giving your view. Why is selective listening dangerous for managers? Selective listening is dangerous because leaders hear only what confirms their opinion and miss critical information attached to the message. The team may be giving a warning, but the boss only hears agreement or resistance. Managers often listen for "yes," "no," "done," or "not done." They may miss nuance, risk, uncertainty, capacity issues, client concerns, or cultural hesitation. This is particularly risky in Japan, where indirect communication may carry important meaning between the lines. A team member may say, "That may be difficult," and the foreign leader may hear mild inconvenience rather than serious impossibility. Selective listening creates false confidence and poor decisions. Do now: Listen for context, constraints, and risk signals, not just agreement with your preferred plan. What does attentive listening look like in leadership? Attentive listening means giving the speaker full focus without interrupting, filtering, finishing their sentences, or redirecting the conversation too early. It is disciplined, patient, and practical. Attentive leaders listen to the entire point before responding. They paraphrase what they heard and check whether they understood correctly. They do not mentally draft their next speech while the employee is still talking. This improves execution because misunderstanding is caught early. It also builds trust because the team member feels respected. In performance reviews, project updates, client debriefs, and cross-cultural meetings, attentive listening can prevent avoidable confusion and rework. Do now: Use the phrase, "Let me check I understood you correctly," then summarise the person's point in plain language. Why is empathetic listening essential in Japan? Empathetic listening is essential in Japan because meaning is often carried through tone, hesitation, context, silence, and what is not directly said. Leaders must listen with their eyes as well as their ears. English can be direct and confronting, while Japanese communication is often more indirect, contextual, and circuitous. This does not make one style better than the other; it means leaders need cultural range. Empathetic listening means trying to enter "the conversation going on in the other person's mind." Is the person worried, unconvinced, embarrassed, overloaded, or quietly disagreeing? Are they saying yes to preserve harmony while thinking no privately? These signals matter. Do now: Watch facial expression, pace, silence, and tone. Then gently check what the person really means before assuming agreement. Final summary Leadership communication is not a monologue. It is not a memo, a speech, or a rapid-fire burst of executive brilliance. Communication only works when the message is understood and acted upon correctly. Leaders must move beyond one-way broadcasting and build habits of clarification, paraphrasing, attentive listening, empathetic listening, and feedback loops. This is especially important in bilingual or cross-cultural workplaces where English and Japanese communication styles can easily collide. The goal is simple: fewer misunderstandings, stronger trust, better execution, and a team that feels heard. FAQs Why do leaders think they are communicating when they are not? Leaders often mistake message delivery for understanding. Sending an email or giving instructions does not prove that people understood the meaning, priority, deadline, or expected action. What is the best way to check understanding? The best way is to ask people to explain the decision, deadline, owner, and next step in their own words. This should feel like a normal communication habit, not a test. Why is listening difficult for busy leaders? Listening is difficult because leaders are often already preparing their response while the other person is speaking.This creates the appearance of attention without real understanding. What is empathetic listening? Empathetic listening means listening for emotion, context, tone, hesitation, and what is not being said. It helps leaders understand the person behind the words. Why is communication harder between English and Japanese speakers? English is often direct, while Japanese can be more indirect and context-driven. This creates more room for misunderstanding, especially when people nod politely despite partial comprehension. Quick actions for leaders Replace one-way communication with feedback loops. Ask clarifying questions after important instructions. Have team members restate decisions and deadlines. Stop preparing your reply while others are speaking. Listen for tone, hesitation, silence, and hidden concerns. Use written follow-up for complex or bilingual instructions. Make checking understanding a normal team habit. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021, and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers: Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery, along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Bagaimana jika negara adidaya dipimpin oleh sosok yang sering membuat pernyataan kontroversial dan keputusan yang mengguncang dunia? Dalam episode Helmy Yahya Bicara kali ini, Dinna Prapto Raharja mengupas tuntas gaya kepemimpinan Presiden AS Donald Trump yang kerap dianggap impulsif, penuh kejutan, dan mengandalkan komunikasi yang memecah opini publik.Mengapa banyak anak muda di Amerika mulai merasa jenuh dan skeptis terhadap pola kepemimpinan semacam ini? Apakah gaya komunikasi yang kontroversial justru menjadi kekuatan politik Trump, atau malah menjadi ancaman bagi demokrasi dan stabilitas global?Tak hanya membahas dinamika politik dalam negeri Amerika Serikat, podcast ini juga mengulas bagaimana kebijakan-kebijakan Trump berdampak langsung pada Indonesia.Saksikan pembahasan lengkapnya hanya di Helmy Yahya Bicara!

Invista no exterior com 1,1% de IOF pela Remessa Online. Acesse o site ou baixe o app. [Patrocinado]https://www.remessaonline.com.br/corretoras-investimentos-internacionais?utm_medium=display&utm_source=bloomberg&utm_campaign=RM_Display_Bloomberg_Podcast_Investimento-2025A expansão do uso de medicamentos análogos ao hormônio GLP-1, que favorece a perda de peso – conhecidos popularmente como “canetas emagrecedoras” –, vem transformando a cesta de consumo.

Hoje temos uma nova greve geral contra as alterações que o Governo quer fazer à Lei do Trabalho. As alterações também implicam mexer na própria Lei da Greve. Análise de Pedro Sousa Carvalho.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In a sales call, the person who controls the agenda usually controls the outcome. Buyers are busy, cautious and often defensive because they worry about wasted time, poor fit, cash flow pressure and being sold something they do not need. Professional salespeople do not bully the buyer, but they also do not drift along sweetly while the buyer runs the meeting. They build trust early, set a clear structure, ask intelligent questions and guide the conversation toward whether real value can be created. Why should salespeople control the sales meeting agenda? Salespeople should control the sales meeting agenda because buyers need structure, confidence and relevance before they will trust the conversation. Without a clear agenda, the meeting can wander into price, product features or objections before the salesperson understands the buyer's real business situation. In Japan, the United States, Europe and across Asia-Pacific, executives are under pressure to protect time, cash flow and decision quality. A buyer may be thinking, "Don't waste my time," "Don't erode my budget," or "Don't sell me something irrelevant." That is why the salesperson must professionally map the meeting from the start. This is not about domination. It is about leadership, clarity and respect. Do now: Open the meeting by explaining the value of the conversation, then propose a simple agenda before asking permission to proceed. How do salespeople build trust at the start of a sales call? Salespeople build trust by looking professional, sounding confident and explaining quickly who they are, what they do and who they have helped. Trust forms before the buyer has seen the proposal, the pricing or the solution. The stereotype of the salesperson is still damaging: pushy, smooth-talking, self-interested and focused on closing. Professionals must separate themselves from that image immediately. Appearance matters because buyers initially judge what they can see. Voice matters because hesitation, mumbling and unclear language signal uncertainty. A strong opening covers four points: who you are, what your company does, who else you have created success for and why the same may be possible for this buyer. Do now: Prepare a concise credibility opening that can be delivered clearly in under one minute. What should a salesperson say before asking discovery questions? Before asking discovery questions, the salesperson should explain the meeting flow and gain the buyer's agreement to that structure. This creates permission, reduces resistance and stops the buyer from hijacking the conversation. A useful sales call agenda starts with the benefit of the meeting for the buyer. Then the salesperson checks how familiar the buyer is with the company and asks about existing perceptions. After that, the conversation can move into the buyer's current situation, future goals, obstacles and the implications of not solving those challenges quickly enough. Only then should the salesperson ask detailed questions. Do now: Use a simple transition: "How does that agenda sound, and are there any items you would like to add?" Why should salespeople ask about buyer perceptions early? Salespeople should ask about buyer perceptions early because hidden resistance blocks trust and later slows or kills the sale. If a buyer has a negative view of the company, the salesperson needs to know before presenting solutions. Competitors may have spread rumours. A previous salesperson may have disappointed the client. The buyer may have experienced poor service, weak follow-up or unreliable communication. In Japanese B2B sales, where reputation, consistency and long-term trust carry heavy weight, unresolved perceptions can become silent deal-breakers. Asking early feels risky, but it is professional. If the issue is severe, it would block the sale anyway. Better to surface it, address it and show accountability. Do now: Ask calmly, "What perceptions do you currently have of our company?" Then listen without becoming defensive. How can salespeople respond to past negative experiences? Salespeople should respond to past negative experiences by acknowledging the issue, showing accountability and demonstrating that the company has changed. Defensive excuses weaken credibility; professional ownership strengthens it. If a buyer says a previous representative was unreliable, the salesperson can ask, "If a member of your sales team created complaints from customers, what would you do?" Most executives would say they would remove, retrain or replace that person. The salesperson can then say, "That is exactly what we did, and I am here now to make sure we provide real value." This approach reframes the issue from denial to responsibility. Do now: Prepare a calm, respectful response for common legacy objections before the meeting begins. Why should salespeople discuss speed to business goals? Salespeople should discuss speed because buyers may be able to reach their goals eventually, but the seller's value often lies in helping them get there faster. Time-to-result is a powerful business lever. A company may want higher revenue, stronger leadership, better sales performance or improved client retention over the next three to five years. Given unlimited time, many organisations could improve on their own. The sales opportunity appears when the salesperson explores what is slowing progress now: weak skills, unclear processes, poor execution, limited resources or market pressure. This is especially relevant for SMEs, multinationals and B2B firms competing in post-pandemic markets where speed, productivity and cash efficiency matter. Do now: Ask, "What is slowing your progress toward those goals, and what would faster achievement mean for the business?" Conclusion: Who should really run the sales call? The professional salesperson should guide the sales call, but the buyer's priorities must shape the conversation. That is the balance. The seller controls the structure; the buyer provides the truth. When salespeople open with credibility, map the agenda, surface perceptions, explore current and future states, identify obstacles and connect value to speed, they stop being pushed around and start acting like trusted advisers. The best salespeople are not aggressive closers. They are disciplined meeting leaders who create clarity for busy buyers and value for their own company. FAQs Should the salesperson or buyer set the sales agenda? The salesperson should propose the agenda, while giving the buyer room to add or adjust items. This keeps the meeting professional while respecting the buyer's priorities. Is asking about negative perceptions risky? Yes, but avoiding the question is riskier. Hidden objections often become silent deal-breakers, so strong salespeople surface them early. When should salespeople present their solution? Salespeople should present only after understanding the buyer's situation, goals, challenges and urgency.Presenting too early usually sounds generic and self-serving. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Atenção (disclaimer): Os dados aqui apresentados representam minha opinião pessoal.Não são de forma alguma indicações de compra ou venda de ativos no mercado financeiro.Seleção das partes mais interessantes das Lives de segunda.Live 372 - Visão do Estrategistahttps://youtube.com/live/0v5BmxROkiI

No trabalho consegues gerir tudo.Em casa explodes por causa de umas meias no chão.E depois vem a culpaSe isto te soa familiar, este episódio é para ti.Hoje falo sobre o momento entre o trabalho e a casa que a maioria das mulheres nunca aprendeu a usar.E sobre o que está mesmo por trás da reatividade que sentes quando chegas a casa depois de um dia exigente.Não é falta de paciência.Não é falta de amor.É um padrão automático que nunca foi reprogramadoOuve até ao fim.Vai fazer sentido.

Imposter syndrome does not disappear just because someone becomes a business owner, Ph.D., author, trainer, executive, or recognised expert. The voice in the head still asks, "Who do you think you are?" The answer is not perfection. The answer is humility, preparation, integrity, and the courage to share what we do know. Why do presenters feel imposter syndrome? Presenters feel imposter syndrome because public speaking exposes them to judgement, comparison, and the fear of being found short. The more visible the platform, the louder the inner critic can become. Some people grow up with confidence-building advantages: elite schools, international travel, family connections, debate practice, and early exposure to public speaking. Good for them. For many others in Japan, Australia, the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, the path is more ordinary or rocky. They build careers through effort, discipline, and persistence. Then one day the company asks them to present to the team, speak at an industry event, join a webinar, or represent the firm publicly. Suddenly the mind asks, "Am I really qualified?" Do now: Recognise imposter syndrome as a normal reaction to visibility, not proof that you should stay silent. Can successful leaders still suffer from imposter syndrome? Yes, successful leaders can suffer from imposter syndrome even after gaining degrees, titles, ownership, awards, and expertise. Achievement does not automatically erase old self-doubt. A person can own a company, hold a doctorate, publish books, lead teams, and speak frequently, yet still feel like the kid from the old neighbourhood. Identity has long roots. In executive communication, leadership training, sales presentations, and keynote speaking, external credentials help, but internal confidence may lag behind. This is especially common when leaders move across cultures, industries, or languages. A foreign executive in Japan, a founder pitching investors, or a manager addressing a multinational team may all wonder whether they truly belong at the front of the room. Do now: Stop assuming confidence comes automatically with credentials. Build it through repeated, honest practice. How does perfectionism make presenting harder? Perfectionism makes presenting harder because it convinces speakers they need complete knowledge before they have the right to speak. That standard is impossible and paralysing. No presenter has absolute knowledge. Not the CEO, not the professor, not the consultant, not the trainer, not the bestselling author. The healthier mindset is relativity: you may know more than many people in the room about a particular topic, while still being a student of the craft. That is enough. In business presentations, the goal is not to claim omniscience. The goal is to offer useful experience, examples, frameworks, and judgement. The old line about the one-eyed person being king in the kingdom of the blind captures the point, even if it stings a little. Do now: Replace "I must know everything" with "I can share what I know while continuing to learn." What should presenters do when an expert is in the audience? Presenters should welcome experts in the audience and invite their contribution where appropriate. Their presence does not diminish the speaker; it can enrich the session. When a bona fide expert appears in the room, the imposter voice may panic. Don't. Acknowledge their expertise, ask for their view on a specific point, and let the audience benefit. This is not surrender. It is confidence. Audiences in boardrooms, conferences, universities, and professional associations appreciate a speaker who can create dialogue rather than pretend to dominate every subject. The expert is unlikely to leap up and denounce you as a fraud. More often, they add colour, nuance, or a useful example. Do now: Treat expertise in the room as an asset. Share the stage intellectually without giving away your authority. How should speakers handle criticism or hostile questions? Speakers should never argue with the audience; they should acknowledge different views, stay calm, and let the wider audience judge. Fighting from the stage usually weakens the speaker. In karate, taisabaki means moving to the side so the attacker strikes empty air. Presenters can use the same idea. Do not stand rigidly in front of criticism, trying to prove perfect knowledge. Move aside by saying, "That is a useful perspective," or "There are different views on this." If someone cherry-picks your words, removes context, or misrepresents your point, stay composed. Public opposition can create mental fog, especially in live forums e, webinars, panels, or Q&A sessions. The perfect answer may arrive an hour too late. That is still learning. Do now: Prepare calm response phrases before the event. Do not let one hostile question drag you into a public wrestling match. How can presenters build trust despite self-doubt? Presenters build trust by admitting limits, showing integrity, and offering genuine value without pretending to be perfect. Humility makes the speaker harder to attack. When speakers openly accept that they are still learning, there is no hard target. The audience already knows nobody has perfect knowledge. What they want is sincerity, preparation, and something useful. This matters in Japan's consensus-driven business culture, in US-style debate environments, and in European or Asia-Pacific professional settings. The speaker who allows diverse views, avoids defensiveness, and keeps the brand intact looks more trustworthy, not less. Nervous? Keep it to yourself. Most audiences want the presenter to succeed and will not notice the nerves nearly as much as the speaker imagines. Do now: Be honest about limitations, generous with other viewpoints, and disciplined about not broadcasting your nerves. Conclusion: How can leaders overcome imposter syndrome when presenting? Imposter syndrome loses power when we stop pretending we need to be flawless. The real standard is not perfection. The real standard is integrity. Do we know something useful? Have we prepared? Can we help the audience think, act, or improve? Can we stay humble when challenged? If the answer is yes, then we have the right to speak. We can stand up, share what we know, invite other views, and keep learning. The doubts may still mutter in the background, but they do not get to run the meeting, the presentation, the webinar, or the keynote. FAQs Is imposter syndrome common in public speaking? Yes, imposter syndrome is common because presenting makes people visible and open to judgement. Even experienced leaders can feel exposed when they speak publicly. Do I need to be a complete expert before presenting? No, you do not need perfect knowledge before presenting. You need useful experience, preparation, integrity, and the humility to keep learning. What should I do if an audience member knows more than me? Acknowledge their expertise and invite their input where useful. This shows confidence and gives the audience more value. How should I respond to hostile questions? Stay calm, avoid arguing, and acknowledge that different views may exist. Let the audience judge the exchange rather than turning it into a fight. Should I tell the audience I am nervous? Usually, no. Keep your nerves to yourself because most audiences want you to succeed and may not notice. Focus on helping them rather than announcing your anxiety. Author bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021 and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

"You have to make the effort to talk to the people who are decisive" "You shouldn't be the ambassador or the mail boy" "Communication is very important" "People are not stupid. They really see immediately if people do not walk the talk" "Be respectful and don't say no too fast"   Klaus Meder is Previous President of Bosch in Japan, leading a business that has evolved from a network of joint ventures, license relationships and specialised manufacturing operations into a major Bosch Group presence of about seven thousand associates. His Japan career began in the late 1990s, when he worked for roughly five years in a Bosch-Zexel joint venture in Tomioka, Gunma Prefecture, where he led a largely Japanese team in airbag electronic control systems while bridging technology, culture, language and headquarters relationships. He returned to Japan in mid-2017, bringing decades of Bosch experience, deep product expertise and a practical understanding of how German and Japanese business cultures can work together. His leadership story is shaped by adaptability: learning when hierarchy matters, when direct communication is needed, when respect must come first, and how a global company can build engagement, trust and innovation in Japan. Klaus Meder's reflections on leadership in Japan are valuable because they avoid both romanticism and stereotype. He first came to Japan in the late 1990s to work in a joint venture between Bosch and Zexel Corporation in Tomioka, Gunma Prefecture. The organisation was small, local, highly Japanese and deeply hierarchical. The seating order itself reflected the organisation chart, with senior managers placed according to rank and younger engineers progressively further away. For a young German vice president working through a translator, the first leadership challenge was not simply language. It was credibility. Meder earned that credibility through technical expertise, connections to headquarters and a willingness to communicate with the people who actually held authority, even when communication was difficult. He is clear that a common mistake for foreign executives is to speak only with the younger employees who have stronger English. That may feel efficient, but it bypasses the hierarchy and weakens trust. His advice is to respect the decision structure and make the effort to speak with decisive people. This is where Japan-specific concepts such as nemawashi, ringi-sho, consensus and uchi-soto become practical leadership realities rather than cultural vocabulary. A leader must understand where influence sits, how decisions are prepared and why inclusion matters before a formal decision appears. Meder also challenges simplistic views of Japan as indirect or passive. His early experience included a very direct Japanese president who shouted at people, and Japanese colleagues who told him plainly that he was too young. The lesson is that intercultural training is useful, but reality is more complex than the stereotype. Japan combines respect, formality, hierarchy and strong customer orientation with moments of surprising directness. When he returned to Japan in 2017, Bosch Japan had grown dramatically. The leadership challenge had shifted from surviving in a traditional joint venture to building one Bosch spirit across legacy companies, product relationships and long-standing industrial ties. Engagement, in his view, is not captured perfectly by global survey scores. A question such as whether an associate would recommend the company to a relative carries different weight in Japan because personal responsibility, employer responsibility and uncertainty avoidance are culturally stronger. For Meder, engagement is built through communication and practical proof. During the coronavirus crisis, Bosch Japan held weekly crisis meetings, shared outcomes and used his personal blog, translated into Japanese, to explain global and local decisions. The company also ran a vaccination programme for thousands of associates and family members. Trust was not just discussed; it was operationalised. That same trust appears in working-time recording, where associates record their own hours honestly even though overtime pay is affected. His leadership definition is anchored in approachability, conviction, walk the talk behaviour and judgement. Leaders must know when to let teams run and when to make clear decisions. In Japan, they must be respectful, slow to reject ideas, serious about language and body language, and willing to encourage people to move faster in their careers. For Meder, leadership in Japan is not about forcing a Western model onto a Japanese organisation. It is about combining respect with clarity, trust with accountability, and global ambition with cultural intelligence. Q&A Summary What makes leadership in Japan unique? Leadership in Japan is unique because formal structure, informal influence and respect all operate at the same time. Klaus Meder describes an earlier workplace where the seating order mirrored the organisation chart and where communication moved through clear hierarchical channels. A foreign leader who ignores that structure can easily damage trust. Effective leadership therefore requires understanding nemawashi, consensus-building, ringi-sho style preparation and the boundary between uchi and soto. Japan is not simply hierarchical for the sake of hierarchy; it is a system in which responsibility, respect and decision ownership must be carefully managed. Why do global executives struggle? Global executives often struggle because they mistake English fluency for authority. Meder warns against speaking only to younger engineers or managers who communicate easily in English while bypassing senior decision-makers. That may accelerate conversation in the short term, but it weakens alignment. Executives also struggle when they rely too heavily on stereotypes. Meder was told that Japanese leaders were indirect and quiet, yet his first Japanese president was extremely direct. The real skill is to observe, adapt and communicate with the people who matter, not with the people who are merely easiest to reach. Is Japan truly risk-averse? Meder's comments suggest that Japan is not simply risk-averse; it is responsibility-conscious. Engagement survey questions reveal this difference. When Japanese associates are asked whether they would recommend the company to a relative or friend, they may hesitate not because they are disengaged, but because they feel personally responsible for both the person and the employer. This is closer to uncertainty avoidance than lack of commitment. Leaders need decision intelligence: the ability to interpret survey data, promotion reluctance and customer requests through cultural context rather than through a single global benchmark. What leadership style actually works? The style that works is respectful, approachable and clear. Meder emphasises communication, trust and walk the talk behaviour. People quickly notice when leaders say one thing and do another. In stable periods, leaders can let the team operate independently. In crises, people want leaders to bring them together and make clear decisions. This flexible style matters in Japan because excessive command can suppress initiative, while excessive delegation can create uncertainty. The leader's task is to know when to let loose and when to lead. How can technology help? Technology helps when it creates participation, visibility and learning. Bosch uses continuous improvement, hackathons, internal start-up platforms and online training to draw ideas from associates and make them visible to management. In an advanced manufacturing environment, the same principle extends to decision intelligence, digital twins and data-informed process improvement: technology should not replace trust, but it can make problems, options and learning cycles clearer. For engagement, the platform itself can be as valuable as the eventual winning idea because associates see that their ideas are heard. Does language proficiency matter? Yes, language proficiency matters, but effort matters even before mastery. Meder says Japanese is difficult, yet even a few words can be appreciated because the effort signals respect. He also stresses the importance of gestures and body language. In Japanese grammar, the decisive word can come at the end, and sometimes it is not spoken at all. Leaders therefore need to read tone, silence and non-verbal cues. Language is not only vocabulary; it is a way of understanding respect, hesitation, agreement and disagreement. What's the ultimate leadership lesson? The ultimate lesson is to combine respect with movement. Meder advises foreign leaders to be respectful and not say no too quickly, especially to customers or associates. At the same time, he believes Japanese careers often progress too slowly. He encourages associates to think in three-to-five-year career steps rather than staying in the same role for ten or fifteen years. Leadership in Japan therefore means honouring the culture while helping people grow beyond the limits the culture can sometimes impose. Author Credentials Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have also been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). In addition to his books, Greg publishes daily blogs on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, offering practical insights on leadership, communication, and Japanese business culture. He is also the host of six weekly podcasts, including The Leadership Japan Series, The Sales Japan Series, The Presentations Japan Series, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews. On YouTube, he produces three weekly shows — The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews — which have become leading resources for executives seeking strategies for success in Japan.

Neste episódio, Luiz Gasparetto propõe um choque de realidade: o excesso de tarefas, exigências e “necessidades” criadas pelo mundo de fora vai sugando energia e afastando do que é essencial. Ele insiste em centrar na alma, dizer “não” ao que não tem conexão verdadeira e fazer um confronto interno: parar de correr, olhar a própria compulsão, encarar ansiedade, raiva e fantasia — e assumir responsabilidade pelo que vem sendo alimentado.O fio condutor é disciplina emocional e limpeza mental: sair do juiz interno (certo/errado, culpa, pecado, carma), interromper pensamentos que esmagam e trocar por um estado de autoconsideração (“eu sou só coisa boa”). A ideia final é prática e dura: um minuto de atitude no presente muda o rumo, porque o que destrói é o autoabandono — e a saída é se defender de verdade, escolhendo paz e força por dentro.Com uma vasta biblioteca de cursos e palestras em áudio e vídeo do nosso mestre Luiz Gasparetto, você pode descobrir as leis universais e o poder do autoconhecimento. Acesse agora e comece a sua jornada: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.gasparettoplay.com.br

Jorge Natan recebe Fred Gomes e Thiago Lima para analisar vitória sobre o Cusco, com dois gols do atacante.

Handling mistakes is one of the hardest leadership tests because everyone is watching. A missed deadline, poor-quality work, lost sale, compliance issue, or public error does not just affect the person involved; it reveals the leader's judgement, emotional control, fairness, and communication skill. Great leaders do not explode, humiliate, or destroy trust when mistakes happen. They investigate, listen, separate the person from the problem, and choose the right response based on whether the individual accepts accountability. In Japan, Australia, the United States, Europe, and across Asia-Pacific, where talent retention and psychological safety matter more than ever, mistake handling is no longer a soft skill. It is a leadership survival skill. Why is mistake handling such a major leadership test? Mistake handling matters because the whole team judges the leader by how they respond under pressure. If the leader reacts with rage, humiliation, or blame, trust and loyalty can collapse very quickly. Mistakes are often public. People see who missed the deadline, lost the client, damaged the quality, or created the operational mess. They also see whether the boss becomes a coach or a corporate executioner. In post-pandemic workplaces, where employees have more career options and lower tolerance for toxic management, public anger is expensive. Leaders who cannot control themselves may win the moment but lose the team. The best leaders protect standards without destroying dignity. Do now: Before responding to a mistake, ask, "What will the rest of the team learn from how I handle this?" What should leaders avoid when employees make mistakes? Leaders must avoid emotional explosions, public humiliation, personal attacks, and instant judgement. These reactions may feel powerful in the moment, but they damage trust, psychological safety, and long-term performance. The classic "rage-athon" boss may have a brilliant résumé, elite education, and impressive title, but none of that matters if they cannot manage their temper. In Japanese boardrooms, US sales teams, European professional firms, or Asia-Pacific regional offices, fear-based leadership produces silence, avoidance, and quiet departures. People stop admitting problems early because they fear the punishment. That means mistakes become hidden until they are much larger and harder to repair. Do now: Never discipline in anger. Pause, gather facts, and protect the person's dignity while still protecting the business. How should leaders investigate a mistake before responding? Leaders should begin with research, not rumours. They must gather facts, understand context, and avoid being manipulated by people who may have their own agenda. When someone says, "You won't believe what Tanaka has done now," the leader should be cautious. Sometimes the messenger is accurate. Sometimes they are positioning, blaming, exaggerating, or trying to damage a rival. Good leaders investigate before forming a view. What happened? Who was involved? What process failed? Was this a one-off error, a capability issue, a workload problem, a systems issue, or misconduct? For serious mistakes, leaders should quietly ask, "Is this person worth saving?" Do now: Separate evidence from opinion. Do not let the first emotional report become the official truth. Why should leaders begin mistake conversations with rapport? Leaders should begin with rapport because people listen better when they do not feel personally attacked. Honest appreciation lowers anxiety and keeps the conversation productive. This does not mean pretending the mistake is minor or avoiding the issue. It means starting with evidence-based appreciation for what the person has done well before moving into the problem. Dale Carnegie's Principle #22, "Begin with praise and honest appreciation," is practical here. The appreciation must be specific, not fluffy. For example, refer to a project they delivered, a client they helped, or a behaviour you have personally observed. This creates a fairer emotional climate for accountability. Do now: Start with credible appreciation, then move clearly and calmly to the issue that must be addressed. How do leaders discuss the mistake without attacking the person? Leaders should focus on the problem, not the human being. The goal is to depersonalise the issue while still making accountability clear. A good mistake conversation allows the employee to explain what happened first. Then the leader fills in gaps, corrects misunderstandings, and listens carefully for ownership. Are they accepting responsibility, or are they blaming everyone else? Dale Carnegie's Principle #24, "Talk about your own mistakes before criticising the other person," can reduce defensiveness and create psychological safety. The leader might say, "I have made mistakes under pressure too, so let's work through exactly what happened and what we need to fix." Do now: Use calm questions, active listening, and shared problem-solving. Do not label the person as careless, useless, or unreliable. What should leaders do when someone accepts accountability? When someone accepts accountability, the leader should restore, reassure, and retain them. The aim is to fix the problem, rebuild confidence, and keep a valuable person moving forward. If the person owns the mistake, the leader should appreciate that honesty and focus on recovery. What needs to be repaired? What support is required? What process must change so the mistake does not repeat? The individual may already feel embarrassed, anxious, or demotivated. Dale Carnegie's Principle #26, "Let the other person save face," and Principle #29, "Use encouragement. Make the fault seem easy to correct," are powerful in this moment. Accountability should become a bridge to improvement, not a trapdoor to humiliation. Do now: Thank them for taking responsibility, agree on corrective action, and make it clear they can recover. What should leaders do when someone refuses accountability? When someone refuses accountability, the leader must restate the facts, reinforce standards, and make consequences clear. Avoiding responsibility cannot be allowed to become normal behaviour. Some employees blame colleagues, deny evidence, or resist every attempt to help them recover. In that case, the leader should calmly restate the seriousness of the issue and reference company policy, compliance requirements, or performance standards. Dale Carnegie's Principle #28, "Give the other person a fine reputation to live up to," can help. For example: "I know you are professional enough to take accountability for your work, so let's recover from this properly." If resistance continues, formal next steps may be required. Do now: Be fair, factual, and firm. Give the person a chance to step up, but do not excuse persistent denial. When should leaders retain, move, or replace someone after a mistake? Leaders should retain people who accept accountability and can recover, but they may need to move or replace people who repeatedly deny responsibility or do not fit the role. The decision should be based on behaviour, capability, and future contribution. Sometimes the person is on the wrong bus. Sometimes they are on the right bus but in the wrong seat. If they have strengths that fit another area, a transfer may be the humane and commercially sensible option. If coaching, feedback, and support do not change the behaviour, release from the organisation may be necessary. This should not be framed as revenge. It may be better for the person to find work where they can succeed and contribute. Do now: Ask whether the person can realistically succeed in the current role. If not, consider reassignment before termination where appropriate. Final summary Mistake handling is not just about correcting one employee. It is about showing the whole team what kind of leader you are. Rage destroys trust. Rumours distort judgement. Personal attacks damage loyalty. Calm research, rapport, accountability, reassurance, and clear consequences protect both people and performance. The best leaders handle mistakes through a simple but demanding sequence: research, begin with rapport, identify the issue, restore those who accept accountability, reinforce standards with those who do not, and then decide whether to retain, move, or replace the person. FAQs Should leaders punish employees for mistakes? Leaders should not rush to punish mistakes; they should first understand the facts and the employee's accountability. Deliberate misconduct, repeated negligence, and honest errors require different responses. Why is public anger dangerous for leaders? Public anger teaches the team that mistakes are unsafe to discuss. That drives problems underground and damages trust, loyalty, and retention. What if the employee accepts responsibility? If the employee accepts responsibility, help them fix the problem and rebuild confidence. This is the moment to restore, reassure, and retain whenever possible. What if the employee blames everyone else? If the employee refuses accountability, restate the facts and make standards and consequences clear. Give them a chance to recover, but do not normalise avoidance. How do leaders protect psychological safety while maintaining standards? Leaders protect psychological safety by attacking the problem, not the person. They can be calm, respectful, and supportive while still insisting on accountability and improvement. Quick actions for leaders Pause before reacting to a mistake. Gather facts before forming a judgement. Begin the conversation with specific, honest appreciation. Focus on the issue, not the person's character. Listen for accountability. Reassure those who take responsibility. Reinforce standards with those who deny responsibility. Decide whether to retain, move, or replace based on behaviour and fit. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021, and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers: Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery, along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Chame a Laila e descubra como eu posso te ajudar: https://bit.ly/laila-otrabalhodevolveSe você tivesse 15 minutos por dia, o que mudaria na sua vida?

As plataformas digitais podem ser responsabilizadas por golpes, anúncios falsos e conteúdos criminosos publicados na internet mesmo sem ordem judicial? O novo decreto do governo federal que atualiza a regulamentação do Marco Civil da Internet reacendeu o debate sobre a responsabilidade das big techs no Brasil e levantou dúvidas sobre liberdade de expressão, moderação de conteúdo e combate a fraudes online. No novo episódio do Podcast Canaltech, Fernanda Santos conversa com a advogada Camila Giacomazzi Camargo, especialista em Direito Digital da Andersen Ballão Advocacia, para explicar o que muda na prática com as novas regras. No papo, elas discutem: como funcionava a responsabilização das plataformas até agora; o que significa o “dever de cuidado” das big techs; impactos para golpes patrocinados e anúncios falsos; os desafios envolvendo inteligência artificial e deepfakes; e os limites entre segurança digital e liberdade de expressão. Você também vai conferir: Tesla lança bola de futebol futurista inspirada na Copa do Mundo, Meta lança app para disputar espaço com Reddit e Discord e Samsung cria nova memória que promete acelerar celulares com IA. Este podcast foi roteirizado e apresentado por Fernanda Santos e contou com reportagens de João Melo, André Magalhães e Nathan Vieira. A trilha sonora é de Guilherme Zomer, a edição de Yuri Sousa e a arte da capa é de Erick Teixeira.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Business owners often hear the advice, "Work on your business, not in your business." The same principle applies to sales. If the founder, president, or owner remains the main rainmaker, the company may generate revenue today but struggle to scale, transfer value, or survive without them tomorrow. Sales can be addictive. Winning deals, building relationships, and landing major clients all create a powerful dopamine hit. The problem is that when the owner keeps doing the selling, the business stays dependent on one person rather than becoming a scalable sales organisation. Why should business owners work on sales, not in sales? Business owners should work on sales, not just in sales, because scale comes from building a repeatable system rather than personally closing every deal. Founder-led selling may produce revenue, but it can also trap the company at its current size. In SMEs, professional services firms, training companies, consultancies, agencies, and B2B businesses, owners often love the client-facing work. They enjoy the relationships, the negotiations, and the thrill of the win. Yet growth requires hiring, training, coaching, and developing more salespeople. This is true in Japan, the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. If the owner is always out selling, they cannot properly build the sales engine behind them. Do now: Audit how much revenue depends directly on the owner. If the answer is "most of it," the business has a scale problem. Why is founder-led selling hard to give up? Founder-led selling is hard to give up because it feeds ego, identity, habit, and cash flow. Owners often believe they are the best person to win the deal, protect the client, and keep revenue moving. This creates a chicken-and-egg problem. The company needs deals to fund growth, but it also needs the owner to step back so the sales team can grow. Many small businesses bootstrap expansion, so stopping the owner's selling suddenly can damage cash flow. The smart move is not to go from star salesperson to zero overnight. Like a successful athlete becoming a coach, the owner must gradually shift from being in the limelight to developing others. Do now: Start reducing personal selling gradually, not dramatically. Replace founder activity with team capability. How does owner-dependent revenue reduce business value? Owner-dependent revenue reduces business value because buyers worry the sales will disappear when the owner leaves. If the founder is the key rainmaker, the business is less transferable and less attractive to a potential acquirer. When owners eventually sell, buyers examine whether revenue is institutional or personal. If the owner owns the client relationships, the purchaser may lower the valuation, demand an earn-out, or require the founder to stay for several years. For many entrepreneurs, that is a painful surprise. After years of being the boss, working for a new owner can feel impossible. A company that runs without the founder is an asset. A company that relies on the founder is closer to a job with overheads. Do now: Build client relationships with the company, not only with the founder. Why should owners hand clients to salespeople? Owners should hand clients to salespeople because delegation turns personal revenue into organisational revenue.It may feel uncomfortable, but it is necessary if the business is to grow beyond the founder. This handoff can be emotionally difficult. The owner may think, "These are my clients." The clients may also enjoy direct access to the boss, because it makes them feel important. There is another sticking point: once salespeople manage accounts, commissions become a visible cost. But this thinking is small beer compared with the bigger commercial goal. A scalable business needs trained people who can win, retain, and expand client relationships without the owner controlling every conversation. Do now: Create a staged client transition plan. Introduce the salesperson while the owner is still present, then gradually step back. What should owners do instead of personally selling all day? Owners should use their time to coach, mentor, inspect, and improve the sales team's performance. The owner's highest-value role is multiplying the effectiveness of others. Consider the leverage. One owner working 12 hours a day can achieve a lot. But ten salespeople working eight hours each create 80 hours of selling capacity every day. The real question is how the owner should use their 12 hours to make those 80 hours more productive. That means improving prospecting quality, reviewing pipelines, coaching sales conversations, strengthening proposal discipline, and making sure the sales manager is actually managing. Compensation alone is not enough motivation. Habits, accountability, and coaching drive performance. Do now: Shift from "How many deals did I close?" to "How much better did I make the team today?" Why does the sales manager still need supervision? The sales manager still needs supervision because management quality directly affects sales output. Owners should not assume that appointing a sales manager automatically solves the growth problem. Many owners believe they can keep selling because the sales manager is taking care of the team. That assumption is risky. Sales managers can also fall into weak habits: insufficient coaching, poor pipeline inspection, vague accountability, and too little field observation. Everyone may enjoy it when the owner stays busy selling, because it means less scrutiny. But the business becomes stronger when the owner understands what the sales team and sales manager are doing every day. The results may be insightful, or even scary. Do now: Review the sales manager's coaching rhythm, pipeline discipline, and accountability standards every week. Final summary Working on your sales means building a sales organisation that can function without the founder being the main revenue engine. That requires a deliberate shift from personal selling to leadership, coaching, delegation, and system design. For business owners, entrepreneurs, sales leaders, and SME founders, the lesson is clear: founder-led sales may feel productive, but team-led sales creates leverage. If you want the company to scale, survive succession, or become saleable one day, you must gradually step out of the starring role and build a sales machine that works without you. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021 and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers: Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery, along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Corra o circuito CENTAURO DESBRAVA – Use o cupom CORRRIDANOAR10 - https://cnoar.run/CentauroDesabrava2026Neste episódio do CNA News, trazemos as notícias mais importantes do universo da corrida, destacando a histórica mudança na organização da Maratona e da Meia Maratona de Paris após quase 30 anos de uma mesma gestão. Além disso, repercutimos as polêmicas sobre desclassificações por corte de caminho na Golden Run São Paulo, a busca por maior representatividade feminina na Maratona de Porto Alegre e o debate ético sobre o caso do corredor desclassificado por doping.- Fim de uma era na Maratona de Paris com troca de organizador e promessa de percursos dinâmicos e mais imersivos.- Caçador de cortador de caminhos expõe fraudes e gera desclassificações na Golden Run São Paulo.- Criação da mascote Mara, da Maratona do Rio, foi feita por ilustradores 3D e não por inteligência artificial.- Maratona de Porto Alegre ouve a comunidade e busca mais mulheres para os pelotões de pacers.- Repercussão e debate sobre o caso do atleta de ultra que competiu medicado e foi desclassificado por doping.Nossos cupons e links - https://cnoar.run/cuponsO Corrida no Ar News é produzido diariamente e postado por volta das 6 da manhã.

The documentary drama '12 Mile: Guiding the Archipelago' screened at the University of Melbourne on 19 May 2026. More than a tribute to Professor Mochtar Kusumaatmadja's struggle, the film delivers a powerful message: Indonesia's greatest challenge only began after its quarter-century diplomatic victory. - Film dokumenter drama '12 Mile: Guiding the Archipelago' diputar di Universitas Melbourne pada 19 Mei 2026. Lebih dari sekadar mengenang perjuangan Profesor Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, film ini menyimpan pesan bahwa tantangan terbesar Indonesia justru baru dimulai setelah kemenangan diplomasi selama seperempat abad.Dengarkan SBS Indonesian setiap hari Senin, Rabu, Jumat, dan Minggu jam 3 sore.Ikuti kami di Facebook dan Instagram, serta jangan lewatkan podcast kami.

Great presentations do not depend on words alone. Even when the language is unfamiliar, audiences can still detect structure, energy, enthusiasm, pacing, vocal variety, and body language. That is the real lesson for leaders, trainers, salespeople, and executives who want their message to land. Why does presentation structure matter so much? Presentation structure matters because it helps the audience follow the logic, even when the subject is complex or unfamiliar. Without clear structure, listeners get lost and the speaker's expertise becomes harder to trust. A well-designed business presentation has a clear opening, main points, sub-points, transitions, examples, and a strong close. This matters in Japan, Mongolia, Australia, Singapore, the US, and Europe because audiences everywhere need signposts. In leadership training, sales presentations, investor pitches, and corporate town halls, the speaker usually knows the topic far better than the audience. That creates a danger. The presenter can jump between ideas and assume the connection is obvious. It often isn't. Do now: Build your presentation like a guided journey. Make every point and sub-point visibly support the main thesis. How can speakers make transitions between presentation sections clear? Speakers make transitions clear by using deliberate bridges between sections, rather than suddenly leaping from one topic to another. A bridge tells the audience why the next idea belongs in the story. The audience is hearing the material in real time. They cannot rewind the room. That is why transitions, linking phrases, recap lines, and preview statements matter. Ancient storytelling understood this well. Classic literature such as The History of the Three Kingdoms used chapter-end hooks to make readers continue. Business presenters can do something more elegant: "Now that we have seen the client problem, let's examine the cost of leaving it unsolved." That small bridge protects the narrative arc. Do now: Write your bridges before you present. Do not rely on improvisation to connect major sections. Why is enthusiasm important in public speaking? Enthusiasm signals to the audience that the message matters, even before they process every word. If the speaker sounds indifferent, the audience quickly borrows that indifference. Energy is contagious in training rooms, boardrooms, webinars, and conference halls. A coffee-chat level of energy is not enough when presenting to clients, employees, or senior executives. Speakers need to move up several gears. In Asia-Pacific training environments, including Japanese and Mongolian contexts, enthusiasm helps cut through hierarchy, fatigue, translation gaps, and topic complexity. This does not mean fake cheerleading or theatrical overkill. It means controlled intensity, visible commitment, and the physical presence to carry the message. Do now: Raise your energy above normal conversation. Let the audience feel that you care before asking them to care. How does vocal variety keep an audience engaged? Vocal variety keeps attention because changes in volume, speed, pause, tone, and emphasis prevent the audience from mentally checking out. A flat voice is an invitation to daydream. If the speaker is soft and low-key from beginning to end, modern audiences reach for their phones fast. If the speaker is all fire and brimstone from start to finish, the audience gets exhausted. The best delivery uses contrast. Slow down for important ideas. Pause before a key point. Increase pace when building momentum. Lower the voice to create intimacy. Lift the volume when the message needs force. Executives at companies like Toyota, Rakuten, Google, and Salesforce all face the same human attention problem: monotony loses people. Do now: Mark your script for pace, pause, power, and softness. Do not let your vocal delivery get stuck in one groove. Can body language communicate across language barriers? Yes, body language communicates confidence, clarity, and conviction even when the words are not understood. Gesture, posture, facial expression, and movement all carry meaning. When a speaker presents in a language the listener does not know, the non-verbal signals become more obvious. You can still sense whether the presenter is organised, energetic, nervous, passionate, or disconnected. That is why trainers, public speakers, sales leaders, and executives need physical self-awareness. In Japan, where restrained delivery is common in some corporate settings, body language still matters. In the US or Australia, the expected range may be broader, but the principle is the same: the body either supports the message or weakens it. Do now: Practise with the sound off. Check whether your posture, gestures, and movement still communicate confidence. What can presenters learn from speaking across cultures? Presenting across cultures teaches us that communication is bigger than vocabulary. Structure, enthusiasm, vocal variety, and body language travel across borders. Working with presenters from Ulan Bator, Tokyo, Sydney, Singapore, London, or New York reveals a universal truth: audiences respond to organised thinking and human energy. Language matters, of course. Native-language fluency gives a speaker huge advantages. Yet even when the words are blocked by a language barrier, listeners still feel rhythm, confidence, variety, and intent. That should be encouraging. If those signals work in an unfamiliar language, imagine their impact when combined with clear words in your own language. Do now: Treat presentation delivery as a full-body, full-voice skill. Words are only one part of the message. Conclusion: How can leaders become more engaging presenters? Leaders become more engaging presenters by paying attention to the basics they already know but often forget. Structure the talk. Bridge the sections. Lift the energy. Vary the voice. Use the body. Keep improving the craft. None of this is new, complicated, or reserved for professional keynote speakers. The problem is not that executives, trainers, or salespeople have never heard these ideas. The problem is that habits take over. We get comfortable. We lose self-awareness. Then our presentations become flat, fragmented, and forgettable. Let's not do that. FAQs Why is structure important in presentations? Structure helps the audience follow the speaker's logic and remember the message. It turns separate ideas into a coherent journey with a clear beginning, middle, and end. What is vocal variety in public speaking? Vocal variety means changing pace, pause, tone, volume, and emphasis to keep the audience engaged. It prevents the delivery from becoming monotonous or exhausting. How much energy should a presenter use? A presenter should use more energy than normal conversation, while still staying authentic. The goal is controlled enthusiasm, not fake performance. Can audiences understand delivery even if they do not understand the language? Yes, audiences can still read structure, energy, confidence, and body language across language barriers. Words matter, but delivery carries meaning too. How can I improve my presentation delivery quickly? Record yourself and review structure, transitions, energy, vocal variety, and body language. Small adjustments in these areas can make a presentation immediately more engaging. Author bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021 and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

"Behind every number, there is a leader." "If you are a player as well as a coach… that's the single best way to actually have the credibility." "I take the blame. You know, you guys take the credit." "To unlock creativity… protect the odd ideas." "A true leader is somebody who can inspire individual team members to be better than themselves."   Jesper Koll has been in Japan since 1985, when he arrived as a PhD researcher studying global finance. What began as an academic year at Kyoto University became a long-term professional and personal commitment to Japan. Over the decades, he built a distinguished career as one of Japan's most recognised economic and investment commentators, including senior roles as Chief Economist and Chief Strategist at Merrill Lynch Japan and Head of Research at JPMorgan. He has also worked in hedge funds, built his own company, and moved between large institutions and smaller entrepreneurial environments. His career arc reflects a deep adaptability to Japan's business culture, an ability to interpret Japan for global markets, and a leadership style grounded in credibility, humility, local insight, and trust. Jesper Koll's leadership philosophy is rooted in one central belief: in Japan, numbers alone never tell the full story. Behind every figure sits a leader, a team, a community, and a set of relationships that must be understood before meaningful judgement can be made. His experience leading highly skilled research teams in Japan taught him that the Anglo-American model of purely empirical, numbers-first analysis was insufficient in the Japanese context. In Japan, insight came not only from data, but from the human relationships that allowed analysts to understand the people behind the companies they covered. Koll argues that foreign executives in Japan must not assume that global best practice can simply be transferred into Tokyo. What works in New York, London, or Hong Kong will not necessarily work in Japan. The most successful leaders understand the importance of local adaptation. They defend the Japanese way of doing things to headquarters rather than merely transmitting headquarters' orders to Japan. This is where concepts such as nemawashi, consensus-building, ringi-sho, and uncertainty avoidance become important. They are not obstacles to leadership; they are part of the operating system leaders must learn to respect and use intelligently. His own credibility as a leader came from being both a player and a coach. As head of research, he still wrote reports, met clients, appeared on television, spoke at conferences, answered difficult questions, and risked being wrong in public. This gave him standing among a team of highly specialised, confident, and sometimes prima donna analysts. Leadership, for Koll, was not about title or positional power. It was about showing that he could perform, protect the team, make others look good, and take responsibility when things went wrong. Trust, in his view, is created through consistency, humility, and one-on-one relationships. He believes leaders should give credit to the team and take blame themselves. He also stresses the importance of psychological safety, especially in Japan, where fear of failure can limit creativity. Koll deliberately discussed his own mistakes and encouraged analysts to examine failed reports, not as shameful episodes but as learning opportunities. This approach helped reduce defensiveness and made it easier for talented people to speak openly. Creativity, he believes, exists in Japanese teams just as it does anywhere else. The challenge is unlocking it. In brainstorming, the leader must protect unusual ideas and the people who offer them. The outlier, the odd thinker, the person who challenges the consensus may hold the breakthrough. A strong leader prevents early judgement from killing ideas before they can evolve. Koll also cautions against superficial engagement rituals. Going drinking with the team may work for some leaders, but only if it is authentic. People recognise insincerity quickly. Real engagement comes from emotional intelligence, individual attention, and demonstrating that the leader genuinely manages for the team rather than simply managing upward. Ultimately, Koll defines leadership as inspiring individual team members to become better than themselves. In Japan, that means balancing global standards with local realities, protecting the team while challenging them, respecting hierarchy while creating trust, and turning one plus one into three. Q&A Summary What makes leadership in Japan unique? Leadership in Japan is unique because relationships sit behind performance. Koll stresses that data, analysis, and results matter, but they are never enough by themselves. In Japan, the leader must understand the people, teams, and communities behind the numbers. This is especially important because Japanese companies often do not market themselves aggressively or explain their strengths in the polished style common in the United States. The leader must therefore uncover the real story through trust, observation, and long-term relationship-building. Concepts such as nemawashi, consensus, ringi-sho, and hierarchy are not simply bureaucratic customs; they shape how trust is built and how decisions move. Why do global executives struggle? Global executives struggle when they assume that headquarters' methods can be imposed unchanged on Japan. Koll is clear that "our way or the highway" does not work. The foreign leader's natural advantage is the connection to headquarters, but that advantage can be used well or badly. If the leader simply says yes to New York or London, the local team will quickly lose trust. If the leader defends Japan's way of working and helps headquarters understand local realities, credibility grows. The best leaders translate in both directions: they make global strategy understandable locally and make local intelligence valuable globally. Is Japan truly risk-averse? Koll's comments suggest that Japan is less risk-averse than often assumed, but more sensitive to failure, judgement, and uncertainty. In analytical teams, mistakes are inevitable. A good analyst may be right only slightly more than half the time. The issue is not avoiding error, but learning from it. In Japan, where failure can carry stigma, the leader must create psychological safety. Koll did this by openly discussing his own wrong forecasts and encouraging others to analyse mistakes without shame. In this sense, the real leadership challenge is not risk avoidance but uncertainty avoidance: helping people act, learn, and improve even when outcomes are not guaranteed. What leadership style actually works? The leadership style that works is humble, credible, protective, and performance-based. Koll believes leaders must be player-coaches. They must show they can perform the work, face clients, take difficult questions, and contribute directly to results. At the same time, they must give credit to team members and take blame themselves. This combination is powerful in Japan because people watch leaders closely. They notice whether the leader's actions match the message. A leader who protects the team, supports dissenters, and makes others look good earns lasting trust. How can technology help? Technology helps when it supports better process, decision intelligence, and organisational learning, but it does not replace human judgement. Koll described how even a change in production deadlines or software systems could create major disruption because people had deeply embedded ways of working. The leadership task is to manage these transitions firmly and respectfully. In modern terms, tools such as decision intelligence, digital twins, workflow analytics, and AI-supported reporting can help teams understand trade-offs, test scenarios, and improve execution. However, technology only works when leaders respect the human side of adoption: habits, pride, expertise, and fear of disruption. Does language proficiency matter? Koll learned Japanese early, during his time as a student in Kyoto, and that gave him a strong foundation. However, he does not argue that every foreign leader must become fully fluent to succeed. More important is the ability to build relationships with customers, understand the local business environment, and help the team deliver results. Language helps, but humility, curiosity, and direct engagement with clients matter more. A leader who cannot speak perfect Japanese but can make the team look good, win customer trust, and represent Japan effectively to headquarters can still succeed. What's the ultimate leadership lesson? The ultimate leadership lesson is that leaders exist to make others better. Koll defines a true leader as someone who inspires individual team members to become better than themselves. That requires trust, courage, humility, and emotional intelligence. It also requires the ability to select lieutenants wisely, balance different personalities, protect odd ideas, and celebrate periods when the team is simply performing well. Leadership is not constant disruption. Sometimes the right move is to recognise that the team is "in the zone" and preserve momentum. The best leader helps the team become more than the sum of its parts. Author Credentials Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have also been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). In addition to his books, Greg publishes daily blogs on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, offering practical insights on leadership, communication, and Japanese business culture. He is also the host of six weekly podcasts, including The Leadership Japan Series, The Sales Japan Series, The Presentations Japan Series, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews. On YouTube, he produces three weekly shows — The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews — which have become leading resources for executives seeking strategies for success in Japan.

Developing people should be a constant leadership responsibility, not an occasional HR exercise. The real leverage of leadership comes from building the capability of the team so the leader is not trying to personally carry the entire organisation on their back. Managers often work longer hours, solve every problem themselves, and wonder why they are exhausted. Leaders take a different path. They create direction, build the environment, and develop people so that ten capable team members can each contribute their full strength. In Japan, where HR departments are often administrative, rotational, and compliance-focused, the line leader must take people development seriously. Why is people development a leadership responsibility? People development belongs to the leader because the leader knows the team's work, context, strengths, and future needs best. HR can support training logistics, but it cannot replace the leader's daily responsibility to grow capability. In many Japanese companies, HR is not always staffed by long-term human resources specialists. Managers may rotate through HR from sales, export, audit, operations, or administration. That means HR often focuses on forms, leave records, job rotations, and internal process compliance. The leader must therefore guide the development agenda: what skills are needed, who needs exposure, where succession risk exists, and which people have future leadership potential. This is true in large corporations, SMEs, startups, and multinational Japan offices. Do now: Stop outsourcing people development to HR. Use HR as a partner, but own the development strategy yourself. How does mentoring develop employees more effectively? Mentoring develops people by giving them access to objective advice, broader perspective, and feedback that may be easier to accept from someone outside their reporting line. A mentor can sometimes say what the boss cannot. Mentoring is especially valuable when the mentor is not directly responsible for performance evaluation. In Japan's hierarchical workplace culture, employees may be guarded with their direct boss, particularly if they fear negative assessment. A neutral mentor can help them discuss career goals, blind spots, communication challenges, and leadership aspirations more openly. However, mentoring should not be a vague feel-good programme. Companies need to define outcomes: retention, promotion readiness, engagement, skill growth, cross-functional collaboration, or leadership bench strength. Do now: Create or review your mentoring system. Ask, "How do we measure whether this is actually developing people?" Why are job rotations and lateral assignments powerful in Japan? Job rotations, lateral transfers, temporary assignments, and acting roles develop broader business understanding and stronger internal networks. In Japan, where generalist career paths remain common, these tools can be especially powerful. A person who works only inside one department may become technically competent but organisationally narrow. Moving them temporarily into another division helps them understand different priorities, systems, constraints, and personalities. In Japanese companies, where informal relationships often determine how quickly work gets done across departments, these assignments build practical coordination power. Multinationals, SMEs, and professional services firms can use the same idea through secondments, regional projects, or temporary cross-border assignments. Do now: Identify one person who would benefit from a temporary assignment outside their usual function, then define what they must learn from it. How does cross-training reduce business risk? Cross-training protects the organisation from concentration risk when one key person becomes unavailable. If one employee's sudden departure would cause a disaster, the organisation has a leadership problem, not just a staffing problem. Many small and mid-sized businesses discover this too late. One person knows the accounting process, logistics system, client history, CRM workflow, supplier relationship, or reporting routine. Then that person resigns, becomes ill, transfers, or retires, and the business scrambles. Cross-training creates operational insurance. It does not mean everyone must do every job. It means critical tasks have backup capability, documented processes, and at least one trained substitute. Post-pandemic labour mobility and ageing-workforce pressures make this even more important in Japan. Do now: List your five most critical roles or tasks. For each one, ask, "Who can do this tomorrow if the main person disappears?" How can special projects grow future leaders? Special projects, task forces, and committee assignments give employees first-hand experience of leadership pressure, coordination, and accountability. They reveal both potential and skill gaps. It is easy to criticise the boss until you are the one responsible for deadlines, stakeholders, budgets, internal politics, and final results. Project assignments let future leaders experience this reality without immediately placing them in a permanent management role. They develop planning, communication, conflict resolution, influence, and decision-making. In global firms, this may happen through digital transformation projects, ESG committees, client task forces, or regional initiatives. The key question is whether these assignments are strategic development tools or just stopgap labour solutions. Do now: Turn project assignments into deliberate development opportunities with clear learning goals, feedback, and post-project review. Why is shadowing senior leaders such a strong development technique? Shadowing senior leaders helps emerging talent see the whole organisation, not just their narrow functional role. It exposes them to decision-making complexity, leadership style, trade-offs, and executive pressure. Becoming an assistant to a senior leader, chief of staff, understudy, or section head-in-training can be a powerful development experience. The employee sees how strategy, finance, people issues, clients, compliance, and culture connect. They also observe the good, the bad, and the ugly of leadership behaviour. In Japan, where leadership handovers can be rushed because of rotations, a planned understudy system can strengthen succession planning. The problem is not that the idea is complicated. The problem is that busy leaders forget to organise it. Do now: Choose one promising team member who could shadow a leader, attend selected meetings, or act as understudy for a defined period. Final summary People development is not a luxury item to be handled when the calendar is quiet. It is the leader's leverage strategy. Mentoring, rotation, temporary assignments, cross-training, task forces, special projects, senior leader shadowing, and understudy roles all help build stronger teams and deeper succession pipelines. The real question is not whether these techniques are new. Most leaders already know them. The question is whether they are using them consistently, strategically, and early enough to avoid business disruption. FAQs Is people development the job of HR or the leader? People development is the leader's job, while HR should support the process. HR can organise providers, systems, and budgets, but the leader knows the team's practical development needs. Why is cross-training important? Cross-training reduces business risk by ensuring critical work does not depend on one person. It protects continuity when someone resigns, transfers, becomes ill, or is suddenly unavailable. What is the value of mentoring? Mentoring gives employees objective guidance and a safe place to discuss growth. It works especially well when the mentor is outside the employee's direct reporting line. How do project assignments develop leadership skills? Projects force people to practise coordination, decision-making, communication, and accountability. They show employees what leadership pressure feels like before they take on a formal management role. Quick actions for leaders Map your team's critical skills and backup gaps. Build mentoring into the development system. Use rotations and temporary assignments to broaden experience. Create project roles with clear development goals. Let future leaders shadow senior decision-makers. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021, and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers: Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery, along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Sales success rarely comes from one brilliant play, one miracle client, or one giant deal. It comes from doing the basics repeatedly: prospecting, following up, meeting buyers, tracking activity, and grinding through the boring work other salespeople avoid. Vince Lombardi, the legendary Green Bay Packers coach, talked about the importance of blocking and tackling in American football. The same idea applies in sales. The flashy strategy matters, but if the fundamentals are weak, everything collapses. Why do salespeople need to master the basics? Salespeople need to master the basics because revenue is built on consistent, repeatable activity, not hope. Big deals are wonderful when they land, but they rarely arrive without disciplined prospecting, follow-up, and pipeline management. In sales, the equivalent of blocking and tackling includes cold calling, referral requests, client research, CRM updates, proposal follow-up, and face-to-face buyer contact. These tasks are not glamorous. They are often boring, irritating, and repetitive. Yet in Japan, the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, the salespeople who survive downturns are usually those who keep doing the fundamentals while others chase bright shiny objects. Landing the whale client sounds exciting, but years can pass while the promised revenue never appears. Do now: Measure the activity that creates revenue, not just the revenue you hope will appear. Why do talented salespeople sometimes fail? Talented salespeople sometimes fail because intelligence can tempt them to skip the grind. They believe the basics are for lesser mortals and that one clever strategy or major client will rescue the numbers. This is a dangerous mindset in B2B sales, professional services, corporate training, SaaS, consulting, and recruitment. Smart people can talk persuasively about future revenue, strategic accounts, and game-changing opportunities. The problem is simple: until the deal is signed and the money is banked, it is not revenue. Many capable salespeople have left organisations because they preferred impressive possibilities to daily execution. Talent matters, but discipline converts talent into income. Do now: Treat your sales pipeline as evidence, not imagination. If it is not moving, it is not real. How did the pandemic change sales prospecting? The pandemic made sales prospecting harder by pushing buyers out of offices and behind new barriers. Cold calling became more frustrating because receptionists, assistants, and internal gatekeepers often had less access—or less willingness—to connect sellers with decision-makers. Since COVID-19, many clients in Japan and other markets have shifted to hybrid work, remote meetings, and stricter communication filters. Calling the office may produce vague responses, blocked contact details, or a polite refusal to share an email address or phone number. This makes the traditional sales routine more difficult, especially for SMEs and service businesses that depend on new conversations. Yet the need for sales has not disappeared. Business still depends on buyers discovering better solutions, services, and ideas. Do now: Assume the old route to the buyer may be blocked. Build several routes instead. Should tobikomi eigyo make a comeback in Japan? Tobikomi eigyo, or unannounced in-person sales visits, may deserve a careful comeback when phone and email access are blocked. It is not always efficient, but it can create a buyer contact when every digital channel is failing. In Japan, 飛び込み営業 has a long history in sales culture, even though many modern sales teams consider it outdated or inefficient. Post-pandemic, that assumption may need rethinking. If the buyer is back in the office two or three days a week and competitors are not visiting, a professional drop-in can stand out. Not every building allows easy access, especially newer offices with QR codes, reception systems, and security gates. Still, where access is possible, a short visit may create enough human contact to secure a proper appointment later. Do now: Use in-person visits selectively, respectfully, and with a clear reason the buyer should care. How can salespeople respond when gatekeepers block access? Salespeople should respond to gatekeepers with calm persistence, not frustration or arrogance. The aim is to protect the brand while still showing the resilience expected of a serious sales professional. Gatekeepers often believe they are helping the boss by blocking unknown callers, visitors, and sellers. Sometimes they are. But companies also need new suppliers, better services, and fresh ideas, especially during difficult business conditions. A useful response is to acknowledge their viewpoint while reframing the behaviour as the same determined mindset they would want from their own sales team. This approach is particularly important in Japan, where professionalism, politeness, and face-saving matter. Being pushy damages trust; being resilient can earn respect. Do now: Stay polite, firm, and commercially relevant. Never let irritation become the message. What alternatives work when cold calling fails? When cold calling fails, salespeople should create buyer attention through physical mail, referrals, targeted content, and carefully designed outreach. The key is to make the buyer curious within seconds. A mailed package can bypass the phone gatekeeper because assistants may block calls but still deliver physical mail to the executive's desk. The package should not look like ordinary paperwork. A slightly lumpy, relevant, useful item can earn a brief moment of attention. However, the contents must immediately answer the buyer's pressing need. In today's overloaded business environment, attention is narrow. Whether selling training, consulting, software, financial services, or recruitment solutions, the offer must quickly show relevance, urgency, and value. Do now: Design outreach around the buyer's problem, not your product brochure. Final summary Sales is full of boring work, and that is exactly why many people avoid it. Prospecting, tracking, follow-up, gatekeeper navigation, office visits, mailed outreach, and daily discipline are not glamorous. They are the commercial basics that keep businesses alive. The salesperson waiting for the whale client may sound strategic, but the salesperson doing the blocking, tackling, tracking, and grinding is usually the one who survives. In difficult markets, especially post-pandemic Japan, the winners will be those who harden up, return to fundamentals, and keep creating real buyer conversations. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021 and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers: Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery, along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Motivating people is not about shouting slogans, pushing harder, or demanding enthusiasm on command. Real leadership motivation comes from building relationships, shaping culture, and creating a work environment where people can motivate themselves. For leaders in Japan, Australia, the United States, Europe, and across Asia-Pacific, this is now a central management challenge. Post-pandemic teams expect trust, flexibility, psychological safety, and career development, not command-and-control supervision. The leader's job is to know people deeply enough to understand what drives their effort, loyalty, creativity, and pride. How do leaders motivate people without forcing motivation? Leaders motivate people by creating the right environment, relationship, and culture for self-motivation to emerge.Telling someone to "be motivated" is about as useful as yelling at a plant to grow faster. In organisations from Toyota and Rakuten in Japan to global firms like Microsoft, Salesforce, and Unilever, the best leaders understand that motivation is personal. Some people want mastery, some want recognition, some want autonomy, and others want security, promotion, purpose, or belonging. The leader's role is not to manufacture motivation like a factory output. It is to remove friction, clarify meaning, and connect individual aspirations with company goals. Do now: Stop asking, "How do I motivate my people?" Start asking, "What environment would help each person motivate themselves?" Why do managers fail to really know their people? Most managers only know their people at a surface level because they are busy, task-driven, and overly dependent on formal reviews. They may know job titles and KPIs, but not the person behind the role. Many leaders interview team members when they first take over a department, then slip back into meetings, deadlines, dashboards, and performance reviews. In Japanese companies, multinational regional offices, startups, and SMEs alike, this creates a polite but shallow relationship. The manager knows what people do, but not why they care, what frustrates them, what they value, or where they want to go. Performance reviews rarely reveal this because employees often protect themselves in formal settings. Do now: Replace one purely transactional check-in each week with a genuine conversation about work, goals, interests, or career direction. What is an "innerview" and how is it different from an interview? An innerview is a gradual, trust-based way of understanding a person from the inside, not a one-off managerial interview. It happens through casual, authentic conversations over time. An interview is usually structured, scheduled, and often linked to hiring, onboarding, or performance management. An innerview is different. It may happen over coffee, lunch, a short walk, or a relaxed conversation after a meeting. The leader has intention, but not manipulation. The aim is to understand what matters to the team member so the leader can help them succeed. This matters in post-pandemic workplaces where retention, engagement, hybrid work, and career mobility are constant issues. Do now: Build a habit of small, natural conversations. Do not turn curiosity into interrogation, and do not use personal information as leverage. What questions help leaders understand employees better? Leaders should start with factual questions, then gradually move toward deeper causative and values-based questions. Trust determines how deep the conversation can go. Factual questions explore background: where someone grew up, studied, travelled, worked, or developed interests. These are not checklist questions; they should surface naturally. Causative questions go deeper: why they chose a career path, why they left a previous company, why a hobby matters, or what kind of work gives them energy. Values-based questions are deeper again, touching pride, regret, mentors, resilience, fairness, ambition, and contribution. In cultures with strong privacy norms, including Japan, timing and tone matter enormously. Do now: Use three levels of curiosity: facts for context, "why" questions for motivation, and values questions only after trust exists. Why are values so important in leadership motivation? Values reveal whether a person's deepest drivers align with the leader, the team, and the organisation. Without values alignment, motivation becomes fragile and short-term. A person may accept a job for salary, title, brand prestige, or convenience, but they usually stay engaged because the work connects with something deeper. That may be craftsmanship, customer impact, learning, family security, social contribution, professional pride, or loyalty to colleagues. Leaders who understand these values can assign work, give recognition, coach performance, and discuss career paths more effectively. Leaders who ignore values often rely on money, pressure, or fear, which rarely builds sustainable performance. Do now: Ask reflective questions such as, "What work are you most proud of?" or "What advice would you give someone going through a tough patch?" How can leaders avoid sounding manipulative when getting to know staff? The difference between care and manipulation is intention, or what Japanese leadership thinking might call kokorogamae. People quickly sense whether a leader is genuinely trying to help or merely trying to use them. If a manager asks personal questions to extract productivity, employees will feel it. If the manager asks because they want to create common ground, understand aspirations, and support career growth, the relationship strengthens. Time, place, and occasion are critical. A rushed corridor question before a deadline is not the same as a thoughtful conversation over coffee. Leaders need patience. They should not force intimacy, overstep privacy, or convert every conversation into a management tactic. Do now: Check your intention before every deeper conversation. Ask yourself, "Am I trying to help this person grow, or simply trying to get more out of them?" Final summary Motivation is not a speech, slogan, or performance-review checkbox. It is the result of leadership trust, cultural design, and personal understanding. When leaders know their people beyond job descriptions and KPIs, they can create conditions where employees choose to bring more effort, ownership, and creativity to the work. The practical leadership shift is simple but demanding: move from interview to innerview. Learn facts, explore causes, understand values, and hold every conversation with the right intention. FAQs Can leaders really motivate employees? Leaders cannot force motivation, but they can create the conditions where motivation becomes more likely. That means building trust, clarifying purpose, removing obstacles, and connecting work to personal goals. What is the best way to understand employee motivation? The best way is through consistent, casual, trust-based conversations over time. Formal reviews help with performance tracking, but deeper motivation usually emerges through natural dialogue. Why are values-based questions sensitive? Values-based questions touch identity, pride, regret, ambition, and belief, so they require trust. Leaders should build up gradually through factual and causative conversations first. Is this approach relevant in Japan? Yes, especially because trust, intention, and relationship quality are central to effective leadership in Japan. The idea of kokorogamae reinforces the importance of sincere purpose behind the conversation. Quick actions for leaders Schedule more informal one-on-one conversations. Ask fewer checklist questions and more thoughtful "why" questions. Listen for values, not just tasks and complaints. Avoid rushing trust. Use what you learn to support career growth, not to manipulate output. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021, and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programmes, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers: Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery, along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）, and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

Me siga nas redes sociais: Facebook: Diego Menin Instagram: @diegonmenin Youtube: Diego Menin X: @diegonmenin Site: www.diegomenin.com

A nova lei sancionada pelo governo brasileiro aumentou as penas para crimes praticados no ambiente digital. Mas será que punições mais duras são suficientes para frear o crescimento dos golpes online? No novo episódio do Podcast Canaltech,Fernanda Santos conversa com Renata Salvini, diretora do capítulo brasileiro da Global Anti-Scam Alliance (GASA), sobre o avanço das fraudes digitais no Brasil e no mundo, o impacto da inteligência artificial nesse cenário e os desafios para combater um crime que já funciona como uma verdadeira indústria global. Durante o papo, Renata explica o que muda na prática com a nova legislação, por que os golpes se tornaram cada vez mais sofisticados e como criminosos usam redes sociais, mensagens falsas, engenharia social e até IA generativa para enganar vítimas. A entrevista também aborda um ponto pouco discutido quando o assunto é fraude online: o impacto emocional. Segundo dados citados pela especialista, muitas vítimas sentem vergonha, culpa e estresse após cair em golpes, o que inclusive contribui para a subnotificação desses crimes. O episódio traz ainda orientações importantes sobre o que fazer após sofrer um golpe, a importância da autenticação em duas etapas e o papel de bancos, plataformas digitais, operadoras e usuários na prevenção contra fraudes. Você também vai conferir: Netflix testa IA para recomendar filmes como um assistente, WhatsApp libera recursos premium e IA para assinantes no iPhone e Xiaomi lança power bank com proteção reforçada contra explosões. Este podcast foi roteirizado e apresentado por Fernanda Santos e contou com reportagens de João Melo, Viviane França e Nathan Vieira,sob coordenação de Anaísa Catucci. A trilha sonora é de Guilherme Zomer, a edição de Vicenzo Varin e a arte da capa é de Erick Teixeira.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Abelardo cuenta por qué tomó la decisión de mudarse a New York y cómo este cambio puede afectar el futuro de 99%. También hablamos sobre la percepción de la gente en redes, la Influ-coin perfecta, por qué nadie está obligado a darte nada, las diferencias de viajar en primera clase, una historia de amor inesperada y el mundo de los streams.