POPULARITY
Categories
“They're All Gonna Laugh At You!”In this episode of Do You Even Movie?, we continue “May They Rest in Peace” month, honoring recently lost legends of the screen. We're also checking off a Listener Request with a horror classic that redefined the genre.Join Henrique & David in California as they revisit the 1976 horror masterpiece that made prom night terrifying—“CARRIE.” Carrie White, a shy outcast with telekinetic powers, faces the wrath of her classmates and the fanaticism of her mother in one of the most iconic and tragic horror films of all time.Directed by Brian De Palma and starring Sissy Spacek, Piper Laurie, Amy Irving, and Priscilla Pointer.
Last time we spoke about the battle of Malacca strait. In the intense Battle of the Malacca Strait, Japanese forces undertook a desperate evacuation amidst relentless attacks by the Allies. After suffering heavy casualties from previous confrontations, the Japanese regrouped and attempted to maintain their defensive positions. However, under the pressure of determined Allied assaults and strategic maneuvers, they faced increasingly fierce resistance. As the Allies advanced, they successfully overwhelmed Japanese defenses, leading to significant losses for the opposing forces. The battle transformed into a pivotal moment in the Pacific War as Japanese resistance crumbled, ultimately shifting the tide toward Allied victory. This clash not only showcased the harsh realities of war but also underscored the relentless determination of both sides as they fought for dominance in the region, marking a crucial step towards the conclusion of the conflict. This episode is the Breakthrough on Okinawa Welcome to the Pacific War Podcast Week by Week, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about world war two? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on world war two and much more so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel you can find a few videos all the way from the Opium Wars of the 1800's until the end of the Pacific War in 1945. As of mid-May, General Buckner's forces had made steady, albeit slow, progress against the determined Japanese defenders on the Shuri defensive line. On May 16, the offensive continued. Colonel Schneider's 22nd Marines and Colonel Whaling's 29th Marines launched yet another unsuccessful assault on Sugar Loaf Hill, while Colonel Snedeker's 7th Marines exhausted their strength in a failed attempt to seize Wana Ridge. To the east, Colonel Coolidge's 305th Regiment advanced 200 yards closer to Shuri. Colonel Hamilton's 307th Regiment nearly captured Flattop and Chocolate Drop Hill but was ultimately pushed back. Colonel Dill's 382nd Regiment successfully cleared Dick Hill but came under intense fire from Oboe Hill. Meanwhile, Colonel May's 383rd Regiment made only minor gains on the southeastern slopes of Conical Hill and Love Hill, even as tanks broke through toward Yonabaru for the first time. The following day, the 383rd Regiment maintained pressure on Conical and Love Hills, prompting General Bradley to commit part of Colonel Halloran's 381st Regiment to the attack. To the west, the 382nd Regiment staged a hard-fought advance of 200 yards but was unable to capture Oboe Hill. Slowly the 77th Division forces between Flattop and Route 5 were reducing enemy positions bearing on the area in front of the 307th Infantry. By 17 May this progress began to show in the advances of the foot troops around Chocolate Drop. Covered by company heavy weapons out on both flanks, infantrymen worked around both sides of the hill to the huge caves on the reverse slope. Inside were 4 antitank guns, 1 field piece, 4 machine guns, 4 heavy mortars, and a American 60-mm. mortars. By nightfall the caves had been partially sealed off. During the night an enemy force launched a counterattack against the American positions around the hill but was repulsed with the loss of twenty-five Japanese killed. On the 17th another bitter struggle raged on Flattop. The struggle swayed back and forth across the narrow crest of the hill. Company K, the assaulting unit, had been reduced to fourteen infantrymen by the end of the day; finally it was forced back off the top. Tanks tried to go through the road cut between Flattop and Dick Hill, but two of them were disabled by mines, leaving the cut blocked. The road cut was later blown along its entire length by seven tons of bangalore torpedoes to remove the mines. Company E continued to push toward Ishimmi Ridge, where they faced a series of heavy Japanese counterattacks. Coolidge's 3rd Battalion and the rest of Hamilton's 2nd Battalion dug in just a few hundred yards north of Shuri and Ishimmi in the highway valley. Meanwhile, Coolidge's 1st Battalion was halted by heavy fire from 110 Meter Hill and the extensive fortress houses in Shuri's suburbs. The intense fighting had nearly depleted the 22nd Regiment, prompting General Amamiya to direct the 32nd Regiment to take over the defense of Shuri along a line extending from Ishimmi to Oboe. Meanwhile, on Wana, the 7th Marines launched a renewed attack but were once again repelled. However, the 5th Marines succeeded in advancing to Hill 55. Further west, the bulk of the 29th Marines attacked toward Half Moon Hill, successfully reaching its forward slopes but later having to withdraw to more defensive positions overnight. Whaling's 2nd Battalion also mounted relentless assaults on Sugar Loaf, each time suffering heavy losses in repelled attacks. As dusk fell, Japanese planes targeted American shipping, successfully damaging the destroyer Douglas H. Fox. On May 18, tanks played a crucial role in a successful assault on Sugar Loaf, executing a double envelopment while securing the top of the hill. The 2nd Battalion then advanced to Horseshoe Hill, while the remainder of the 29th Marines managed to secure the forward slopes of Half Moon.After a night of sporadic bombardment from enemy artillery and mortars, 3/7 again attempted to gain a foothold on Wana Ridge. During the morning supporting weapons concentrated their fire on the forward slopes and crest of the objective and at noon Company I, followed by a platoon of Company L, jumped off and fought its way to the ridge. The assault troops' gains "were measured in yards won, lost, and then won again." Finally, mounting casualties inflicted by enemy grenade and mortar fire forced Lieutenant Colonel Hurst to pull back his forward elements and consolidate his lines on positions held the previous night. On the right flank of the division front the isolated platoon from Company E of 2/5 was unsuccessful in exploiting its hold on the western slopes of Hill 55. The men were driven to cover by intense enemy fire, and tanks again had to be called upon to supply ammunition and rations to the outpost. During the morning operations the 5th Marines laid protective fire with tanks and assault guns along Wana Ridge to support 3/7's advance. At noon, under cover of this fire, Company F sent one rifle platoon and an attached platoon of engineers into Wana village to use flame throwers and demolitions against the enemy firing positions in the ruins. Numbers of grenade dischargers, machine guns, and rifles were found in Wana and the tombs behind it and destroyed. Further advance into the draw was not feasible until the 7th Marines could occupy the high ground on the eastern end of the ridge and furnish direct supporting fire to troops advancing in the draw below. At 1700 the troops were ordered to return to their lines for the night. n the center, General Bruce pressed his attack deeper into the Shuri defenses, with Coolidge's 3rd Battalion gaining 150 yards along the Ginowan-Shuri highway and Hamilton's 2nd Battalion advancing up to 300 yards toward Ishimmi, although attacks against 110 Meter Hill and Flattop failed to gain ground. On the morning of 18 May, orders were given to stay at all costs. Lieutenant Bell said firmly, "We stay." The men resigned themselves to a last-ditch stand. Their grenades exhausted and their machine guns and mortars destroyed, the remaining men salvaged every clip of ammunition from the bandoleers of the dead. Spare workable rifles were loaded and bayonets laid alongside. Enemy pressure increased steadily during the day. Some Americans were shot at close range as they darted from hole to hole to escape grenades. At one time eight knee mortars were pounding the ridge, firing in pairs. Friendly artillery could to some extent keep off the charging Japanese but seemed unable to ferret out the enemy mortars, which were well protected. The moans of wounded men, many of whom were in pitiful condition from lack of water and of medical aid, added to the strain. All canteens had been emptied the previous night. Nevertheless, battle discipline remained excellent. The worst problem concerned the replacements, who were courageous but inexperienced. Thrust suddenly into a desperate situation, some of them failed at crucial moments. One man saw two Japanese attacking a sergeant thirty feet away, but his finger froze on the trigger. Another shouted wildly for a comrade to shoot some Japanese while his own rifle lay in his hands. Another saw an enemy soldier a few yards from his hole, pulled the trigger, and discovered that he had forgotten to reload. By the end of the ordeal, however, the replacements who survived were battle-hardened veterans. During the afternoon the 307th attempted to reinforce the small group. Elements of Company C tried to cross the open ground north of Ishimmi Ridge. Only the commander and five men reached Company E. The men scrambled safely into foxholes, but the commander, shot through the head while racing toward the command post, fell dead on the parapet of the command post foxhole. Spirits rose considerably when word came later in the afternoon that a litter-bearing unit of eighty men would try to get through in the evening. Enemy fire slackened after dark, and the first of the litter bearers arrived at about 2200. They immediately started back carrying casualties. Walking wounded accompanied them. The litter bearers moved swiftly and managed to avoid being seen in the light of flares. Through splendid discipline and good luck eighteen men were carried out in two and a half hours, and others walked out. The litter teams had brought some water and ammunition and the troops drank for the first time since the day before. The second sleepless night on the ridge passed. The 382nd Regiment continued to face heavy resistance from Oboe Hill but managed to secure the road cut between Flattop and Dick Hill. Meanwhile, Halloran's 3rd Battalion could only push about 400 yards south due to the relentless mortar and small-arms fire coming from Hogback Ridge. At sea, a low-flying kamikaze aircraft struck LST-808 off Iejima, resulting in the deaths of 17 men. The following day, while the 382nd and 383rd Regiments focused on neutralizing the cave positions and gun emplacements in the uneven terrain between Conical and Dick Hills, Halloran's 3rd Battalion launched an attack to the south and west toward Sugar Hill but made little progress due to the heavy defensive fire. In the center, the 307th Regiment systematically worked to eliminate enemy firing positions on the high ground in front of them, employing every available weapon for the task. Colonel Smith's rehabilitated 306th Regiment began moving up to replace the battered 305th, with its 3rd Battalion relieving Coolidge's 3rd Battalion and portions of Hamilton's 2nd Battalion along the low ground bordering the highway to Shuri, including the isolated men at Ishimmi Ridge. On 19 May the enemy seemed to intensify his efforts to recapture Ishimmi Ridge. The besieged troops wondered whether his supply of men and ammunition was inexhaustible. The Japanese launched several attacks which were repulsed with great difficulty. Only the support of artillery and mortars, together with self-propelled mounts firing with precision on both flanks of Ishimmi Ridge, prevented the enemy from making an attack in strength which would have overrun the American positions. One enemy attack of platoon strength was dispersed by mortar and machine-gun fire and by a four-battalion time-on-target artillery concentration. Japanese mortar fire continued to fall on Ishimmi, however, and took its toll during the day. A message arrived during the morning that Company E would be relieved that evening. By noon the radio had become so weak that further communication with the company was impossible. The day wore slowly on. By 2100 there was still no sign of the relief. Shortly afterward, however, rifle fire intensified to the rear, a sign of activity there. At 2200 Company L, 3d Battalion, 306th Infantry, arrived. The relief was carried out in pitch darkness; each member of Company E left as soon as a replacement reached his position. As the haggard survivors were about to descend the ridge at 0300, a bursting shell hit two of the newcomers; one of them had to be evacuated on a poncho. Carrying its own wounded, Company E followed a white tape to the rear and arrived safely. Of the 204 officers and men of the reinforced company that had made the night attack on Ishimmi, 156 had been killed or wounded. There were 28 privates, 1 noncommissioned officer, and 2 officers left of the original 129 members of Company E. The platoon sent in relief by Company C had gone out with 58 effectives and returned with 13. Of the 17 men in the heavy weapons section only 4 came back. Company E had spearheaded a several-hundred-yard advance toward Shuri, however, and with the help of supporting weapons had killed hundreds of Japanese around Ishimmi. The 7th Marines launched one last unsuccessful assault on Wana Ridge before being relieved by Colonel Mason's rested 1st Marines. Meanwhile, after repelling a strong night counterattack, the exhausted 29th Marines were also relieved by Colonel Shapley's reserve 4th Marines, which made additional advances alongside the 22nd Marines, now under Colonel Harold Roberts. Four new regiments had been committed over the past few days to revitalize the offensive. On May 20, Shapley's assault battalions gained more ground on Horseshoe Hill but were still unable to reach the crest of Half Moon, though they successfully repelled another strong night counterattack. To the east, Mason's 2nd Battalion advanced rapidly to the base of 110 Meter Hill and captured part of Wana Ridge, while his 3rd Battalion secured a firm hold on the northern slope. Concurrently, the 5th Marines attacked southwest along the Naha-Shuri Road and successfully captured the high ground. Meanwhile, in coordination with the 1st Marines, Coolidge's 1st Battalion and Smith's 3rd Battalion made a slow, grinding advance of about 150 yards, positioning themselves within 200 yards of the outskirts of Shuri in the highway valley. At the same time, the 382nd Regiment expanded its hold on the reverse slope of Dick Hill but remained unable to penetrate Oboe Hill. The 307th Regiment consolidated and expanded its positions around Chocolate Drop, finally seizing Flattop. Reducing the tiny hill continued to be ticklish work because enemy positions to the south still overlooked the area. The fighting was still so confused that three wounded Americans lay south of Chocolate Drop for two days before relief arrived. By that time two had died and the third was so delirious that he thought he was still fighting Japanese and had to be forcibly subdued. By 20 May the caves were completely sealed off. The enemy made a final attempt to retake Chocolate Drop, attacking in company strength, but was repelled with the loss of half his force. On the same day the 3d Battalion, using tanks, flame throwers, and demolition teams, finally secured the crest of Flattop. The final American attack started with a saturation shower of grenades. A chain of men extending from the base of Flattop passed hand grenades to the troops lined up along the crest, who threw the missiles as fast as they could pull out the pins. Having seized the advantage, the infantry moved down the reverse slope blasting caves with satchel charges and flame throwers. Tanks along the road cut accounted for many of the Japanese. BY 1545 Flattop had fallen. More than 250 enemy bodies lay on the crest and reverse slope of the hill. Further east, Halloran's 3rd Battalion made a slow but steady advance down the eastern slopes of Hogback, reaching the foot of Sugar Hill despite constant grenade duels with an enemy fighting desperately to hold every inch of ground. Additionally, the 1st and 2nd Battalions of the 383rd Regiment fought their way to jump-off positions within 300 yards of Love Hill, destroying enemy strongpoints that had obstructed their advance for a week. Meanwhile, back at sea, Japanese aircraft managed to damage two destroyers and three transports. The following day, the 383rd again attacked Love Hill but was ultimately forced to withdraw from its base due to fierce defensive fire. Despite this setback, May's 2nd Battalion successfully supported the 381st Regiment in clearing Hogback and pushing to the top of Sugar Hill. To the west, the 382nd advanced quickly against moderate opposition toward Oboe Hill and Hen Hill, encountering retreating enemy units moving toward the high ground at Shuri. Concurrently, the 307th pushed 350 yards south of Flattop before being halted by enemy forces at the Three Sisters, while the 306th completed the relief of the 305th, with its 3rd Battalion advancing 200 yards unopposed to the eastern slopes of 110 Meter Hill. Meanwhile, the 1st Marines continued their assault along Wana Ridge, making only limited gains at the Draw, where the 5th Marines held out and aggressively patrolled forward. The 4th Marines began their push toward the Asato River, achieving a costly advance of about 200 yards on Horseshoe. By nightfall, heavy rains began to fall, significantly impeding efforts to resupply assault troops and replenish forward ammunition dumps. Amidst this torrential downpour on May 22, Shapley's 1st and 3rd Battalions slogged through the "gooey slick mud" to reach the bank of the rain-swollen river. This prompted the Japanese to evacuate Naha and establish new defensive positions on the Kokuba Hills. To the east, the continuous rain flooded Wana Draw with mud and water, transforming it into a makeshift lake. For the next few days, General Del Valle's Marines were forced to attack without support, leading to aggressive patrolling rather than organized assaults. The prospects of success for the infantry alone, slogging through the mud without the support of other arms, were not encouraging. Tanks bogged down, helplessly mired. Amphibian tractors were unable to negotiate the morass, and front-line units, which had depended on these vehicles for carrying supplies forward in bad weather, now had to resort to hand carrying of supplies and of the wounded. These were back breaking tasks and were performed over areas swept by enemy fire. Mortar and artillery smoke was used as far as possible to give concealment for all movement. Litter cases were carried back through knee-deep mud. Living conditions of front-line troops were indescribably bad. Foxholes dug into the clay slopes caved in from the constant soaking, and, even when the sides held, the holes had to be bailed out repeatedly. Clothes and equipment and the men's bodies were wet for days. The bodies of Japanese killed at night lay outside the foxholes, decomposing under swarms of flies. Sanitation measures broke down. The troops were often hungry. Sleep was almost impossible. The strain began to take a mounting toll of men. Under these conditions the Marine attack against Wana Ridge was soon at a standstill. The action degenerated into what was called in official reports "aggressive patrolling." Despite inactivity, enemy mortar and artillery fire continued to play against the American front lines, especially at dusk and at night. In the center, Bruce's 77th Division faced similar challenges, with the 306th Regiment stalled and the 307th Regiment again unsuccessfully attacking the Three Sisters. There, Company A became isolated at the base of the forward slope of Jane Hill, nearly cut off by intense enemy mortar and machine-gun fire. For the following week, the 382nd Regiment struggled to make headway on Hen and Oboe Hills, where fierce hand-to-hand combat erupted. Similarly, all attempts by the 383rd Regiment to breach the defenses of Love Hill on the western side of Conical failed, as the 381st was also unable to make any progress against Cutaway. General Hodge had also moved General Arnold's rehabilitated 7th Division to assembly areas just north of Conical Hill to spearhead the advance toward Yonabaru and the high ground south of the village. Strengthened by 1,691 replacements and 546 men returned to duty from hospitals since it left the lines on 9 May, the 7th Division moved up to forward assembly areas just north of Conical Hill and prepared to make the dash through the corridor. At 1900 on 21 May the 184th Infantry, chosen by General Arnold to lead the way, was in place at Gaja Ridge, at the northern base of Conical. The initial move of the envelopment was to be made in the dead of the night and in stealth. General Buckner felt that "if the 7th can swing round, running the gauntlet, it may be the kill." As part of this operation, the 2nd Battalion of the 184th Regiment moved out from Gaja Ridge during the night, swiftly and silently passing through Yonabaru in the early morning hours to capture Spruce Hill and Chestnut Hill in a surprise attack. Colonel Green's 3rd Battalion then followed the 2nd Battalion through Yonabaru, but their assault on Juniper and Bamboo Hills was unsuccessful as the surprised defenders regrouped. The following day, Green's two battalions continued to push toward these initial objectives, ultimately securing a solid line that stretched from the coastline across the southern slopes of Chestnut, and then over to Juniper and Bamboo by day's end. This success allowed Colonel Finn's 32nd Regiment to pass through Yonabaru and advance westward along the Naha-Yonabaru valley to assault the enemy's western hill defenses focused around Oak Hill.On the west coast, after a successful night reconnaissance of the Asato River, the 4th Marines rapidly crossed the river under cover of smoke, beginning their advance toward a low ridge 500 yards south of the Asato. However, as previously noted, the torrential rain had turned every draw and gully into a sticky morass of knee- and thigh-deep mud in the center. The steep slopes of the hills and ridges, treacherous under the best of conditions, became virtually unassailable. Consequently, full-scale coordinated attacks had to be canceled, and only localized gains could be achieved. Despite the breakthrough in the center, the Japanese command remained concerned about the threat posed to the flanks of the Shuri bastion by American advances along both coasts. While they believed the Naha breakthrough could be contained, every available soldier was deployed to establish a defensive line stretching from the southwest slopes of Conical Hill through Yonawa to the road junction village of Chan, aiming to eliminate Arnold's spearhead that had penetrated into the Naha-Yonabaru valley. General Ushijima feared that his forces were being gradually encircled in the Shuri fortress, where they would become “easy prey” to overwhelming American firepower. In light of this situation, Ushijima began planning a withdrawal to the Chinen Peninsula or the southernmost part of the island, the Kiyamu Peninsula. This decision was met with resistance from General Fujioka, who expressed concern that thousands of severely wounded men would have to be abandoned during the retreat. Although the holding of the heights surrounding the city had been the keystone of the Japanese preferred plan, several factors now militated against its retention. There were an estimated 50000 surviving officers and men to be crammed into a final defense zone less than a mile in diameter. Once these troops were surrounded, the Japanese believed that they would be rendered ineffectual and become "easy prey" to overwhelming American fire superiority. In addition, Japanese long-range artillery pieces, many of which were still intact, could not be effectively utilized within the limited space that would be available. The best chance of prolonging the battle for Okinawa seemed to rest in defending the Kiyamu Peninsula region which was dominated by the Yaeju Dake-Yuza Dake Escarpment. Natural and artificial caves, sufficient to accommodate the whole of the surviving army, abounded in the area. The 24th Division, which had organized the terrain, had left a considerable amount of ammunition and weapons there when it moved north to the Shuri lines. The principal roads in southern Okinawa led directly to the proposed position, thus facilitating the movement of large bodies of men in the shortest possible time. These roads also gave American tanks an excellent route of advance, but only to the outposts of the defensive zone where cliffs, hills, and precipitous ridges barred the way. To add weight to his argument, General Amamiya indicated that his 24th Transport Regiment had preserved enough trucks to move the Shuri munitions reserve to the new position within five nights if weather conditions permitted. General Ushijima, after considering the respective positions of his staff and commanders, decided to order the move to Kiyamu. Although General Suzuki preferred the Chinen Peninsula, which his brigade had fortified, most officials supported a move to the Kiyamu Peninsula, where Amamiya's 24th Division had previously established defenses in the natural and artificial caves of the Yaeju Dake-Yuza Dake Escarpment. Thus, transportation of wounded personnel and munitions reserves to the south commenced at midnight on May 23, with the bulk of the 32nd Army scheduled to begin their withdrawal six days later. On the night of 25 May, the remnants of the 62d Division were to pull out of the Shuri line and move through Tsukasan to counterattack the Americans. The relatively strong 22d Independent Infantry Battalion, which had been in reserve throughout most of the fighting in April and May, was directed to hold the Shuri front in place of the division. The orders to General Fujioka were "to annihilate the enemy rushing from the Yonabaru area." Failing this, the division was at least to stop the American advance long enough to allow the main body of the Thirty-second Army to retire. In order to gain time to organize the new positions, the holding force left on the Shuri front was to fight on until 31 May. Withdrawing units were to leave behind strong rearguards which would defend a line along the Kokuba Gawa to the hills north of Tsukasan and Chan and then south through Karadera to the east coast until the night of 2 June. Then a second line centered on Tomusu, approximately 2,000 yards farther south, would be held until the night of 4 June. By that time the Thirty-second Army would be firmly set up within its Itoman-Yunagusuku-Gushichan outpost zone. Admiral Ota's naval force was directed to hold the west flank of the withdrawal corridor and begin its own retreat when ordered by 32nd Army. During the night, Admiral Ugaki initiated his seventh mass Kikisui attack, launching 165 kamikaze aircraft that inflicted only light damage on landing craft. On May 24, while engineers constructed a bridge over the Asato River to facilitate vehicle movement, the 4th Marines suffered heavy casualties as they attempted to advance through the muddy, flooded valley and low clay hills. Simultaneously, Shepherd's Reconnaissance Company crossed the lower Asato and roamed the streets of northwestern Naha without encountering any resistance. To the east, Dill's 1st Battalion faced a brutal counterattack that inflicted significant casualties and nearly drove the Americans from Oboe Hill. Following Ushijima's directives, the 32nd and 184th Regiments began to encounter increasing resistance as they sought to expand their control over the valley and the high ground to the south. This culminated in a series of aggressive nighttime counterattacks that ultimately slowed and halted the western advance of the 7th Division. During the night, Japanese forces conducted heavy raids on American airfields at Kadena, Yontan, and Iejima. However, these attacks were merely a diversion for Operation Gi-Gou, a suicide raid against Kadena and Yontan. In this operation, twelve Ki-21 heavy bombers, carrying Giretsu Kuteitai special airborne assault troops, aimed to crash land on the airfields to deploy commandos tasked with destroying aircraft stationed there. After the start of B-29 attacks on Tokyo from bases in the Mariana Islands, the 1st Raiding Brigade of the Teishin Shudan was ordered to form a commando unit for a "special operations" mission to attack and destroy the bombers on the Aslito Airfield on Saipan. Captain Okuyama Michiro, commander of the brigade's engineering company and trained in sabotage and demolition was selected as mission leader. He selected an additional 126 men from his own team, the 4th Company of the 1st Raiding Regiment, to form the first Giretsu Airborne Unit. It was initially organized with a command section and five platoons and one independent squad, based at the Imperial Japanese Army's air academy at Saitama. The group unit also included eight intelligence officers and two radio men from the Nakano School. Giretsu operations were to be undertaken at night, beginning with air strikes by bombers. After this, commando units would be inserted onto the target airfield by crash landing their transports. The fact that there was no provision for extraction of the strike force, along with the rejection of surrender in Japanese military doctrine at the time, meant that the Giretsu ground operations were effectively suicide attacks. Though the Saipan attack was eventually cancelled, the 6th Air Army ultimately requested the deployment of the Giretsu Special Forces to neutralize the Okinawa airfields. The 6th Air Army accordingly began preparations for the attack in early May. Led by Captain Okuyama, the raid force moved from Nishitsukuba to Kumamoto as it continued to prepare for the assault, codenamed Operation Gi-Gou. Aircraft for the raid came from the 3rd Independent Air Unit based in the vicinity of Hamamatsu. The raid force consisted of 120 commandos broken up into a headquarters section and five flights, each containing twenty men. They were to be transported by twelve Mitsubishi Ki-21s stripped of their guns and with additional forward and rear exits added to assist raiders with exiting. The timing of the raid was also meant to coincide with the withdrawal of the 32nd Army from the Shuri Line in southern Okinawa. Of the twelve bombers dispatched, four encountered engine trouble and returned to base, while three were intercepted by American night fighters en route to Okinawa. The remaining five Ki-21 bombers approached Yontan Airfield at low altitude and engaged Marine anti-aircraft gunners from the 1st Provisional Anti-aircraft Artillery Group. As a result, four of the bombers were shot down or crash-landed; however, a small number of Giretsu commandos survived this wave and commenced their mission to attack aircraft on the airfield. The fifth bomber, however, successfully evaded anti-aircraft fire and belly-landed approximately 100 meters from the control tower. About 10 commandos disembarked and attacked aircraft and air personnel with grenades. In the ensuing chaos, the Japanese commandos killed two Americans, wounded 18, destroyed nine aircraft, damaged 29 more, and set a fuel dump ablaze, destroying 70,000 gallons of aviation gasoline. After twelve hours of mayhem, however, American troops hunted down the commandos and exterminated them to a man. Despite this partial success, the Japanese operation occurred against a backdrop of heavy losses, with American fighters and anti-aircraft fire claiming a total of 150 Japanese planes on May 24. During the course of three days, Ugaki committed a total of 387 Navy planes and 174 Army planes to his kamikaze attacks, which continued through May 25. These attacks successfully sank the destroyer Bates, one transport, and one landing craft, while further damaging two destroyers, one destroyer minesweeper, one minesweeper, one transport, and one Liberty ship. On the same day, Admiral Rawlings' Task Force 57 launched its final strikes in the Okinawa area before retiring late on May 25, having completed the Royal Navy's Iceberg mission. On land, while Shepherd's Reconnaissance Company occupied the deserted ruins of Naha, the 4th Marines fought to seize Machisi Ridge and continued pushing into the eastern outskirts of Naha. However, across the remainder of the 10th Army front, assault units struggled to make progress due to the havoc wreaked by the rain and the stiffened Japanese resistance. That night, in accordance with the withdrawal plan, the 62nd Division began moving its remaining 3,000 men to counter the advance of the 7th Division, hoping to delay the American advance long enough for the main body of the 32nd Army to retreat. The arrival of additional forces on the Ozato-Mura front had little significant impact, primarily serving to strengthen the covering and holding force. On May 26, the 184th Regiment successfully cleared the Hemlock-Locust Hill Escarpment. Meanwhile, the 32nd Regiment was brought nearly to a standstill in front of the Japanese defensive line across the Yonabaru valley. Looking west, Del Valle's Marines observed large numbers of enemy troops withdrawing from Shuri and were able to pinpoint their location for naval guns, artillery, and aircraft to bombard. However, despite penetrating the Shuri defensive line on both flanks, the day yielded minimal progress. At sea, further kamikaze attacks caused damage to one destroyer, one destroyer minesweeper, and a subchaser. In total, Ugaki's raids over the past three days resulted in the deaths of 103 sailors. Believing the fast carriers' continued value off Okinawa had become dubious, back on May 18 Mitscher had requested that TF 58 be relieved from its Okinawa station. Spruance regretfully declined. A week later an increasingly weary Mitscher reported: “For two and a half months [Task Force 58] operated daily in a 60nm square area East of Okinawa, less than 350nm from Kyushu. This was necessitated by the restricted area available and the necessity for being able to cover [the] Amami Gunto airfields, intercept air raids before they could reach Okinawa, and still furnish air support to ground forces. There was no other location from which all these things could be done.” Reflecting on the months of unrelenting stress, tedium, and fatigue, TG 58.1's screen commander, Captain Tom Hederman, signaled Rear Admiral J.J. Jocko Clark: “See Hebrews 13, verse 8.” Consulting his Bible aboard Hornet, Clark read: “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and today, and forever.” Amused, Clark forwarded the verse to his entire Task Group, adding, “No disrespect intended.” Clark then signaled Mitscher, “What the hell are we doing out here, anyway?” Mitscher's response: “We are a highspeed stationary target for the Japanese air force.” Indeed, TF 58 had already suffered over 2,000 Iceberg fatalities. I would like to take this time to remind you all that this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Please go subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry after that, give my personal channel a look over at The Pacific War Channel at Youtube, it would mean a lot to me. The brutal Battle of Okinawa was reaching a critical point as General Buckner's forces pressed against fierce Japanese defenses. Struggles unfolded over Sugar Loaf Hill and Wana Ridge, with Marines suffering heavy casualties but slowly gaining ground. By late May, the dire situation prompted Japanese commanders to plan a retreat to more defensible positions as American forces closed in. Despite challenging conditions, the Allies pushed forward, marking a decisive breakthrough in the Pacific War.
BE WARNED: It's LuAnna, and this podcast contains honest, upfront opinions, rants, bants and general explicit content. But you know you love it.On this week's Luanna: The Podcast: The most private school bake off experience EVER, Anna's boy mum moment, thumbing a dead vag, dealing with a clinger and a Hen story we won't forget in a hurry.Plus: A new male contraceptive, under performing school starters and an interesting sounding porridge. Remember, if you want to get in touch you can: Email us at luanna@everythingluanna.com OR drop us a WhatsApp on 07745 266947Please review Global's Privacy Policy: https://global.com/legal/privacy-policy/
The summertime is the best time to take on a new puppy. To find out the reason for this, and to check on what's involved in bringing a new animal into your life, listen here.
Hafta başı itibariyle Türkiye yeni bir sürece girdi. PKK'nın kendisini feshetmesinin sağlanması ile beraber terörsüz Türkiye yolunda çok ciddi bir aşama da geçilmiş oldu. Elbette bu bir süreç yönetimi gerektiren uzun ve meşakkatli bir iş. Henüz her şey tamamen bitmiş değil. Son derece titiz ve dikkatli yönetilmesi gereken bir dönemdeyiz. Ancak gelinen noktanın son derece kıymetli olduğunu da unutmamak gerekiyor.
Mothers and Daughters and Sons and Steaks In honor of Mothers Day this weekend, consider that animals love their babies too and, just as humans, they long to nurse, nuzzle, and bond with their babies. They cry, and some go crazy when their babies are taken from them, just as we would. What we put into our mouths is our choice. Listen to today's episode written by Michelle Schaefer at MainStreetVegan.com #vegan #plantbased #plantbasedbriefing #mothersday #compassion #veganism ========================== Original post: https://mainstreetvegan.com/mothers-and-daughters-and-sons-and-steaks-by-michelle-schaefer-vlce/ ========================== Related Episodes: Brigitte Gemme's breastfeeding story and how it caused her to become vegan: https://youtu.be/8UQy27K99LA?si=ff6-pFnx3oaPc_h0 888: “What Wings Are For” - The Story of Ruby and Ivy https://plantbasedbriefing.libsyn.com/888-what-wings-are-for-the-story-of-ruby-and-ivy-by-kay-evans-at-upc-onlineorg 796: Are Feminists Right to Resist Comparison with the Females of Other Species? https://plantbasedbriefing.libsyn.com/796-are-feminists-right-to-resist-comparison-with-the-females-of-other-species-by-karen-davis-at-upc-onlineorg 795: The Hen is a Symbol of Motherhood for Reasons We May Have Forgotten https://plantbasedbriefing.libsyn.com/795-the-hen-is-a-symbol-of-motherhood-for-reasons-we-may-have-forgotten-so-let-us-recall-by-karen-davis-at-upc-onlineorg 535: Dairy Makes a Mockery of Birth and Motherhood https://plantbasedbriefing.libsyn.com/535-dairy-makes-a-mockery-of-birth-and-motherhood-by-liz-truitt-at-mothers-against-dairy-posted-at-all-creaturesorg 467: A Bovine Sophie's Choice by Holly Cheever DVM https://plantbasedbriefing.libsyn.com/467-a-bovine-sophies-choice-by-holly-cheever-dvm-at-action-for-animals-posted-at-all-creaturesorg 410: The Mother Turkey and Her Young https://plantbasedbriefing.libsyn.com/410-the-mother-turkey-and-her-young-by-karen-davis-at-upc-onlineorg ========================= Main Street Vegan Academy is the premier training & certification program for Vegan coaches. Their mission is to encourage the adoption and maintenance of a positive vegan lifestyle and a health-promoting diet, geared to the needs and preferences of the individual, for the purpose of creating a just world for all beings and protecting this planet. Founder Victoria Moran went vegan in 1983; overcame a binge-eating disorder; in 1985 wrote Compassion the Ultimate Ethic, the first book about Vegan philosophy and practice to come from an actual publisher; raised a Vegan daughter; wrote 12 additional books and has another on the way; and appeared twice on Oprah. Learn more at https://MainStreetVegan.com ============================== FOLLOW PLANT BASED BRIEFING ON: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@plantbasedbriefing Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2GONW0q2EDJMzqhuwuxdCF?si=2a20c247461d4ad7 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/plant-based-briefing/id1562925866 Your podcast app of choice: https://pod.link/1562925866 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PlantBasedBriefing LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/plant-based-briefing/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/plantbasedbriefing/
Henny, Elaina & Janelle coming together to give you their personal thoughts and perspectives on how they've navigated the sneaker community, industry and culture.We got @antbanx on the couch with us and he did not disappoint! Ant's not only fashionable af but he's pretty damn funny too! From working at Stashed with Hen to curating his own space in Oakland called Cafe Gumbo.Do yourself and a favor and listen to this week's episode.FOLLOW ⤵️IG: @SneakyLeakPod / @HennyKicksit @Dopest.E @JCheyenne_Apple Podcast & Spotify: Sneaky Leak PodcastYoutube: Sneaky Leak Podcast
Lungworm is an increasingly common parasite in dogs, and it can have a lethal impact. To find out more, and to check what you need to do to protect your pet, listen here.
LES 127Er is geen liefde dan die van God.Jij denkt misschien dat er verschillende soorten liefde mogelijk zijn. Jij denkt misschien dat er een soort liefde is voor dit, en een soort voor dat; een manier om de een lief te hebben, en een andere manier om een ander lief te hebben. Liefde is één. Ze kent geen afzonderlijke delen en geen gradaties, geen soorten of niveaus, geen verschillen en geen onderscheidingen. Ze is zichzelf gelijk, volkomen onveranderlijk. Ze verandert nooit naar gelang de persoon of de omstandigheid. Ze is het Hart van God en tevens van Zijn Zoon.De betekenis van liefde is duister voor ieder die denkt dat liefde veranderen kan. Hij ziet niet in dat veranderlijke liefde nu eenmaal onmogelijk is. En dus denkt hij dat hij nu eens liefhebben, en dan weer haten kan. Hij denkt bovendien dat liefde aan de een kan worden geschonken, en toch zichzelf kan blijven hoewel ze anderen wordt onthouden. Zulke dingen over liefde geloven betekent niet begrijpen wat liefde is. Als ze dergelijke onderscheidingen kon maken, zou ze tussen de rechtvaardige en de zondaar moeten oordelen, en de Zoon van God in afzonderlijke delen waarnemen.Liefde kan niet oordelen. Omdat ze zelf één is, ziet ze alles als één. Haar betekenis ligt in eenheid. En ze moet wel ontgaan aan de denkgeest die denkt dat ze partijdig of gedeeltelijk is. Er is geen liefde dan die van God, en alle liefde is de Zijne. Waar liefde afwezig is regeert geen ander principe. Liefde is een wet zonder tegendeel. Haar heelheid is de kracht die alles bijeenhoudt, de schakel tussen de Vader en de Zoon die Hen beiden voor eeuwig als hetzelfde samenbindt.Geen cursus die tot doel heeft jou te leren je te herinneren wat jij werkelijk bent, kan nalaten te benadrukken dat er nooit een verschil kan zijn tussen wat jij werkelijk bent en wat liefde is. De betekenis van liefde is jouw betekenis en wordt gedeeld door God Zelf. Want wat jij bent, is wat Hij is. Er is geen liefde dan die van Hem, en wat Hij is, is al wat er is. Hemzelf is geen beperking opgelegd, en dus ben jij eveneens onbeperkt.Geen wet waaraan de wereld gehoorzaamt, kan jou helpen de betekenis van liefde te bevatten. Wat de wereld gelooft, werd gemaakt om de betekenis van liefde te verbergen en die duister en geheim te houden. Er is geen enkel principe dat door de wereld hooggehouden wordt, dat niet indruist tegen de waarheid van wat liefde is en wat jij bent.Probeer niet in de wereld jouw Zelf te vinden. Liefde wordt niet gevonden in duisternis en dood. Toch is ze volkomen duidelijk voor ogen die zien en oren die de Stem van de liefde horen. Vandaag oefenen we om je denkgeest vrij te maken van alle wetten waaraan jij denkt te moeten gehoorzamen, van alle beperkingen waaronder je gebukt gaat en alle veranderingen die volgens jou deel uitmaken van het menselijk lot. Vandaag zetten we de allergrootste stap die deze cursus verlangt in je voortgang naar zijn vastgestelde doel.Als je vandaag ook maar het vaagste begrip verkrijgt van wat liefde betekent, heb jij een onmetelijke afstand en een in tijd ontelbaar aantal jaren overbrugd op de weg naar je verlossing. Laten we dan samen vandaag met blijdschap enige tijd aan God geven en begrijpen dat dit het allerbeste gebruik van de tijd is dat er is.Ontsnap vandaag gedurende twee keer vijftien minuten aan elke wet waarin jij nu gelooft. Stel je denkgeest open en rust. Aan de wereld die jou gevangen schijnt te houden, kan iedereen ontsnappen die er niet aan is verknocht. Neem alle waarde terug die jij aan haar povere aanbiedingen en onzinnige geschenken hebt gehecht, en laat de gave van God ze allemaal vervangen.Roep je Vader aan, in de zekerheid dat Zijn Stem zal antwoorden. Hijzelf heeft dit beloofd. En Hijzelf zal een vonk van waarheid in je denkgeest plaatsen, overal waar jij een onjuiste overtuiging of een duister waanbeeld van je eigen werkelijkheid en van wat liefde betekent, opgeeft. Hij zal vandaag door je loze gedachten heenstralen en je helpen de waarheid van de liefde te begrijpen. In liefdevolle mildheid zal Hij bij jou verblijven, wanneer je Zijn Stem toestaat om aan je schone en open denkgeest de betekenis van liefde te leren. En Hij zal de les met Zijn Liefde zegenen.Vandaag vallen de talloze toekomstige jaren van wachten op de verlossing weg tegenover de tijdloosheid van wat jij leert. Laten wij vandaag dankzeggen dat ons een toekomst zoals het verleden blijft bespaard. Vandaag laten we het verleden achter ons, om het voorgoed te vergeten. En we slaan onze ogen op naar een ander heden, waarin een toekomst daagt die in elk opzicht van het verleden verschilt.Deze prille wereld is als een pasgeboren kind. En wij zullen haar in gezondheid en kracht zien groeien om haar zegen uit te stralen over allen die komen leren de wereld aan de kant te zetten waarvan zij dachten dat die was gemaakt in haat om de vijand van de liefde te zijn. Nu zijn zij allen samen met ons bevrijd. Nu zijn zij allen onze broeders in Gods Liefde.We zullen de hele dag door aan hen denken, omdat we geen deel van onszelf kunnen uitsluiten van onze liefde als we ons Zelf willen kennen. Denk minstens drie keer per uur aan iemand die de reis met jou maakt en gekomen is om te leren wat jij leren moet. En zodra hij in je gedachten opkomt, geef hem dan deze boodschap van jouw Zelf:Ik zegen jou, broeder, met de Liefde van God, die ik met jou delen wil.Want ik wil de vreugdevolle les leren dat er geen liefde is dan die van God, van jou, van mij, van iedereen.
Today is all about the Witch's Guide to Big Picture Thinking and it is setting the stage for a big month of episodes dedicated to the business world we work in. As witches, we are deeply present beings. We honor the seasons as they turn, we mark the phases of the moon, we listen to the whisper of the winds and the roots growing under our feet. And that's powerful. That's sacred. But here's something I've learned on my own journey, and it's something I feel called to share with you today: It's not just about honoring where we are — it's also about dreaming into where we are becoming. Big picture thinking — long-term visioning — is itself a form of magic. It's spellwork stretched out across time. It's manifestation that doesn't just bloom for a moment but grows into a mighty oak. Today's episode walks us through the steps and I am so glad you are here joining me for it! PatreonWitchy Work WishesHearth & Hen
The live one is here! Several months ago we recorded the show LIVE at the Hen & Chickens Theatre in Highbury, London.And this is the (quite heavily edited) result!Imagine if we took people out of the audience and just started asking them questions about their Amazon Purchase History! IMAGINE!We've done just that and the results, it has to be said, are staggeringly good.We welcome Lizzy and Matthew today and they take us into discussions of Champagne noses, planking through lockdown and where does each Spice Girl go on the political spectrum? All that and more...Here's the thing, too - we're doing this all live again very soon. Tuesday 20th May, to be precise. At 9pm, in Angel Islington.If you'd like to join us then grab a ticket NOW from HERE!Also do check out the following podcasts:Bit Fit, Bit Funny is GREATLife After Jazz Hands is also EXCELLENT.And that's it for now! See you next week for more?Toast xTikTok Instagram YouTube New Episodes every Tuesday and Thursday Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Annemieke Bosman in gesprek met Falun Ellie Koos, schrijver en filmmaker. Hen schreef de roman Rouwdouwers. Hoofdpersoon Ada is samen met haar broer Broos opgegroeid in de stacaravan van hun vader, een verbitterde hovenier die recht wilde schoppen wat door moedervingers krom was geaaid. Hij prentte zijn kinderen in dat de wereld keihard is, en dat ze zich er tegen moeten wapenen. Dit staat diep in Ada's ruggengraat gekerfd, al heeft h geen contact meer met haar vader en broer. Nu ze haar leven als gedesillusioneerd kunststudent de rug toe heeft gekeerd en naar Galicia is vertrokken om hout te hakken met een man waar ze geen taal mee deelt, dringt haar broer zich met elke bijlslag sterker aan haar op: hij is de enige wiens lichaam dezelfde herinneringen draagt, zijn spieren hebben dezelfde reflexen. Toch kennen ze elkaar niet meer. Rouwdouwers gaat over zinken of zwemmen, buigen of barsten. Falun Ellie Koos studeerde af in Writing for Performance aan de HKU. Koos won in 2022 de Joost Zwagerman Essayprijs met het essay ‘Bruiklener' en in 2023 ontving Koos een C.C.S. Cronestipendium voor beloftevolle auteurs van de gemeente Utrecht. Hen schreef en regisseerde de korte film De vloer is lava, die werd genomineerd voor Rialto for short. Rouwdouwers is Falun Ellie Koos' debuutroman en genomineerd voor de Libris Literatuur Prijs.
Kon har vandrat från dyrkat gudaväsen till hornlös mjölkmaskin och metanrapande klimatbov. Ann-Helen Meyer von Bremen följer hennes väg in i fabriken. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna. I begynnelsen var kon. Audhumbla gav di åt jätten Ymer och slickade rimfrosten från stenarna och skapade på det viset Bure, han som blev gudarnas förfader i den nordiska gudasagan.I begynnelsen var kon, inte bara i den nordiska mytologin utan även i många andra skapelseberättelser och religioner. Den egyptiska Hathor, återfödelsens gudinna, födde varje morgon fram solen och bar den mellan sina horn. Israeliterna lät döda 3 000 av sitt eget folk för att de dansade runt guldkalven, en symbol för guden Baal och stark konkurrent till Jahve. Hinduismen har flera gudomliga nötkreatur. Tjurguden Nandi har stark koppling till Shiva och Nandi bär också de döda hinduernas själar i Vietnam, till Indien. Kogudinnan Surabhi, mor till alla kor, skapas när gudar och demoner kärnar det kosmiska mjölkhavet. Hela Vintergatan är för övrigt skapat av komjölk, när Krishna och mjölkerskornas gudinna Radha, råkade spilla ut drycken över hela himlen. I den grekiska mytologin är det istället gudinnan Heras mjölk som ger upphov till Vintergatan, eller Milchstrasse, Milky Way, Voie lactée eller Melkeveien som det heter på andra språk.Hur kommer det sig då att detta djur som inte bara i religioner utan också i människors vardagsliv så starkt har förknippats med skapelse, liv och fruktsamhet, i dag ses som ett hot mot vår existens? Eller rättare sagt, hennes rapar?Den ko som är den vanliga i Sverige, Bos taurus, härstammar från uroxen som var en imponerande bjässe. De största tjurarna hade en mankhöjd på två meter, kunde väga över ett ton, hade väldiga horn och ansågs vildsinta. Julius Caesar menade att de inte gick att tämja ens som kalvar. Så varför ge sig i kast med dessa farliga djur? Människan hade redan tämjt geten och fåret och det fanns gott om vilda djur där boskapsskötarna etablerade sig.En teori är att det inte var mjölken eller köttet utan rituella skäl bakom domesticeringen. De stora hornen sågs som symboler för himlakroppar som månen, med koppling till fertilitet. Kon blev också snabbt en statusmarkör och symbol för kapital. Ordet fä för boskap betydde ursprungligen egendom och latinets, pecunia, pengar, kommer från pecus, boskap. Fortfarande är rollen som flyttbart kapital, bytesmedel och status, den viktigaste rollen för kor i många boskapskulturer.Under lång tid sågs kon som något mycket värdefullt - religiöst, ekonomiskt men också som sällskap. Det finns många skildringar i litteraturen och filmen över den nära relationen mellan kon och människan. I novellen ”Skiljas från sin vän” skildrar lappmarksläkaren och författaren Einar Wallquist detta när han skriver om Mor Katrin som blivit gammal, sjuk och övertalats att skicka kon på slakt. Men det är inget lätt beslut. ”Kossan var hennes enda sällskap, hennes riktiga vän, som hon kunde få prata med så mycket hon ville i sin ensamhet och som hon mötte tillgivenhet av.”Efter nattens sömn ändrar hon sig dock och bestämmer sig för att säga nej till slaktaren: ”Ty det skulle han veta, att ömhet och sällskap och en ko, det säljer man inte!”I Sverige brukar det heta att malmen och skogen har spelat en stor roll för framväxten av det moderna Sverige, men man skulle också kunna nämna kon. Det var runt henne och hennes mjölk, kött, kalvar, gödsel, hud och dragkraft som det mesta kretsade inom lantbruket. Det var försäljningen av hennes smör och ost som gjorde det möjligt för lanthushållen att skaffa de saker som man behövde. Kon står också i centrum när Sverige anammar de nya jordbruksmetoderna från Europa under 1800-talet. Då börjar man bland annat att odla vall (en blandning av gräs och kvävefixerande grödor som klöver) på åkrarna. Det här gav inte bara mer mat till fler kor utan även till fler människor och fler händer kunde sättas i arbete, vilket var en förutsättning för industrialiseringen.Samtidigt som jordbruket börjar kommersialiseras under 1800-talet, växer statarsamhället fram. Herrgårdarna specialiserar sig på mjölkproduktionen som kräver mer arbetskraft och billig sådan. Statarna jobbar hårt och länge, bor i eländiga bostäder och får sin lön främst i form av stat, det vill säga i form av mat från gården. För statarfruarna innebär makens anställning ett extra gissel.”I stället för att hälsas med tillfredsställelse som en extra inkomstkälla har statarhustruns mjölkningsplikt nästan kommit att bli statsystemets värsta plågoris, dess vita piska”.Ivar Lo-Johansson beskriver träffande vad som har hänt. Mjölkningen som tidigare var något positivt, har blivit en plåga. Det vi ser, är början på den industrialiserade lagården.Om kvinnan var slaven i herrgårdarnas mjölkgårdar har kon alltmer axlat den rollen. Descartes syn på djuren som maskiner, har nu blivit verklighet i många av världens mjölkfabriker. De bönder som fortfarande spjärnar emot denna utveckling, ses som bakåtsträvande idealister. Dagens industrialiserade mjölkko är omgärdad av maskiner. Hon matas och mjölkas av maskiner, maskiner tar hand om hennes gödsel, mäter när hon är brunstig och reglerar hur mycket hon ska äta och mjölka. Bonden blir allt mer frånvarande. Hen sitter i sitt kontor och studerar all info från maskinerna. Att gå utomhus och beta, som är det mest essentiella för en ko, anses hon heller inte längre behöva eller klara av. Dyra maskiner vill man helst inte ta ut ur garaget.Problemet med maskiner är att de ger ifrån sig utsläpp. I kornas fall handlar det främst om växthusgasen metan. De har alltid rapat metan, precis som älgarna, rådjuren, hjortarna och de andra vilda idisslarna, men till skillnad från viltet räknas numera metanet från de tama idisslarna som antropogena utsläpp, påverkade av människan. Men även viltet regleras av människan, i form av jakt, skogsbruk, lantbruk, trafik, naturvård och byggande av infrastruktur och bostäder. Mänsklig påverkan har fått viltet att kraftigt öka, jämfört med mitten av 1800-talet då många djur var mer eller mindre utrotade. Ändå gäller inte samma måttstock för dem som för tamdjuren, trots att antalet kor, får och getter har minskat radikalt under samma period.Anledningen är kanske att vi ser viltet om en del av naturen, medan kon är mer en kugge i mjölk- och köttmaskineriet? Därmed viktas hennes metan lika tungt som metanet från utvinningen av fossila bränslen. Lösningen på problemet är lika industriell den, en kemikalieblandning som ska minska kons metanavgång genom att förändra hennes matsmältning.Människan tämjde uroxen för dess gudomliga horn. I dag har människan gjort de flesta kor hornlösa, genom avel eller genom att bränna bort hornanlagen hos kalven, allt för att passa in i matfabriken. Vi verkar inte behöva några gudar längre, kanske inte ens några kor. Men däremot en aldrig sinande ström av maskiner.Ann-Helen Meyer von Bremen, journalist, författare och deltidsbonde. Tillsammans med Gunnar Rundgren författare till boken ”Kornas planet” (2020).Essän producerades av Ann Lingebrandt
Hen szn is here hunnies and so as promised here is our special deepdive! With the help of your excellent DMs, we assess the good and bad of this increasingly divisive topic: from money anxieties and the growing consumerism of the hen-do ‘aesthetic' to how this tradition can provide a much-needed opportunity to celebrate and make time for those you love. Plus, the single gal perspective, hen ‘etiquette', pop culture horror stories,, and whether hens are ultimately progressive or regressive for women. If you enjoyed this please do leave us review on Apple Podcasts or a rating on Spotify - it really does help keep us going! We absolutely LOVE hearing recommendations for Thursday topics or bonus eps too, so please do DM us @straightuppod, or email at hello@straightuppodcast.co.uk RecsAll the Behind-the-Scenes Debauchery From Writer Tish Weinstock's Bachelorette, CosmoBring back tacky hen do's, the I paper Why I wanted a one-night only hen-do, The Times Why I'm no longer going on hen weekends, New Statesman From penis straws to puppy yoga: Inside the ‘zen do' revolution, Independent Henpocalypse!, BBC iPlayerBachelorette, Prime VideoBridesmaids, Prime Video Everything I know about love, Dolly AldertonStag and hen parties swap binges for good clean fun, TimesAre You the Only One Who's Broke? Or Is It ‘Money Dysmorphia'? NY TimesOver and out: why hens, stags and their parties should be put out to grass, Guardian Hens with Heart Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Send us a textWith Turkey Hunting open in most of the United States right now you may have found your Tom's are already Hen'd up. Well don't worry, Alex is going to share some tricks to help bring him on in!Of course we open the show with local and national sports before we dive in. Missouri Hunting Heritage Federation:https://www.mhhf.us/To follow American Roots Outdoors Podcast:https://www.facebook.com/groups/448812356525413To learn more about American Roots Outdoors:https://americanrootsoutdoors.com/https://www.facebook.com/AmericanRootsOutdoors/To follow Alex Rutledge:https://www.facebook.com/americanrootsalex/To follow Wayne Lach:https://www.facebook.com/wayne.lach.5To follow Mike Crase:https://www.facebook.com/mike.crase
I want to explore a subtle, but powerful distinction: What's the difference between the Fae and Nature Spirits? While they both dwell in the liminal spaces of the world, they are not the same—and knowing how to tell them apart can completely change how you interact with the energy around you. We'll talk about who these spirits are, how they show up, and how to respectfully build relationships with each. I'll also guide you through the elemental beings—gnomes, sylphs, undines, and salamanders—and how they connect to the land itself. So whether you're a forest-wandering witch or an apartment-dwelling one who feels the hum of spirit in your potted herbs, this episode has something for you!Witchy Work WishesPatreonHearth & Hen
This week, we discussed the fact that we are heading into peak flea and tick season. What should pet owners do to protect their pets, while also making sure that they do not harm the environment (insects and birds) in any way?
After my visit to the BSAVA vet congress, I heard about a proposed medication to make pets live longer. To hear my take on this, listen in!
The deeper I go into the world of Dark Fae & Shadow Folk, the more I realize that encounters with them, especially the dark ones, aren't just supernatural stories. They're invitations. Invitations to pause. To feel. To examine the parts of ourselves that feel unsettled, unseen, or unclaimed. The Unseelie don't simply challenge us for the thrill of it. They provoke awakening. They stir the soul. They call to the witchwho's ready to walk the in-between. But you do not have to accept every invitation. You do not have to open your door to every knocking spirit or follow every flickering light into the woods. Join me today to learn more about navigating this world and hear of the stories handed down by our ancestors of the Dark Fae and Shadow Folk.Patreon FamilyWitchy Work WishesHearth & Hen
Zo'n 8 miljard mensen, zijn er nu op aarde. In de veehouderij houden wij mensen ongeveer het tienvoudige aan dieren. En daarnaast zijn er natuurlijk nog de wilde dieren, de insecten, de bomen en de planten. Kortom, in aantallen zijn we maar een fractie van al het leven op aarde. En toch, nemen wij alle beslissingen, ook over onderwerpen die andere soorten aan gaan._____________________________________________________Samen maken we meer mogelijk, steun onzepodcast en help ons groeien met jouw donatie:studioplantaardig.nl/donatie_____________________________________________________Hoe eerlijk is dat? En kan dat ook anders? Daarover ga ik in gesprek met Eva Meijer: hen is kunstenaar, filosoof, schrijver, columnist en zanger. Hen schreef 16 boeken, zowel fictie als non-fictie, waarin dieren vaak een centrale rol spelen. Aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam leidt hen een onderzoek getiteld The Politics of Not Eating Animals. En binnenkort publiceert Eva het boek Multispecies Assemblies, waarin hen betoogt dat dieren en andere levende wezens een rol moeten krijgen in politieke besluitvorming.Website Eva Meijer https://evameijer.nl/indexne.htmlMuziek Eva Meijerhttps://evameijer.bandcamp.com/album/the-things-a-girl-should-doConferentie The Politics of Not Eating Animals, 22-23 mei 2025:https://dierfilosofie.mystrikingly.com/conference-2025Deelnemen aan een meersoortig beraad? Dat kan in kunstcentrum Radius in Delft4 mei: https://www.radius-cca.org/en/agenda/nourishing-without-trying-to-living-together-with-human-and-non-human-neighbours18mei: https://www.radius-cca.org/en/agenda/nourishing-without-trying-to-water-for-the-futureCredits:Interview en montage: Esther MolenwijkAudio mixage: Marlon van der Pas, Nothing Blank Help ons het plantaardige nieuws te verspreiden: deel deze podcast.Ga naar studioplantaardig.nl en volg ons via BlueSky, Mastodon, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok & #StudioPlantaardigGeef onze podcast ook een rating en schrijf een mooie recensie. Alvast enorm bedankt!
In Today's episode Katie, Grace, & EJ Talk about 8x13 of 911 titled "Invisiable"A lot happened in this episode from Hen's birthday being forgotten to the 118 having a repeat patient and Eddie dealing with his parents and so much more. Be sure to let us know your thoughts on the episode, be sure to chat with us on discord, dm us on our socials, share your thoughts on our google forms that we tweet out every week after lone star airs, or email us your thoughts. We love reacting to your thoughts as well.Our email is 911lonestarrounduppod@gmail.com (please be sure to write "911 lone star episode thoughts" in the subject line)Be sure to follow the podcast on Instagram, Twitter, Tiktok & Facebook @911lsroundupWe are also are also on youtube check it out here to watch audio version of the podcast and please subscribe https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGkCddGsHvEt7Ocyrt90qoA/videosAlso Join our discord server where we can chat all things 911 lone star & more https://discord.com/invite/RA8z4XNQhgAlso, be sure to follow us on our own socials so we can talk moreKatie: @fortheloveoftarlos on Tiktok,Instagram & Threads @forloveoftarlos on TwitterEmail: Katie@911lsroundup.comGrace: @ronen-rafa_911 on Instagram & @sheepgirl31 on TwitterEmail:grace@911lsroundup.comEJ: @ej8302 on Instagram, threads,Tiktok, & TwitterEJ@911lsroundup.comThanks again guys so much for listening & We will see you next Thursday for a brand new episode where we will talk about 8x14 of 911.
Book Four is upon us, and it is with mixed feelings, both excited and sad, that we launch into the final segments of Finnegans Wake. Helping us along the way is fan-favourite WAKE veteran, internationally-acclaimed author, Lucy "old rubberskin" Brazier, who helps us get into a typically ribald discussion of Simlish, Instagram thots, tortoise dreams, terrible superhero names, fan fiction, and a plan for a Biddy the Hen statue in Phoenix Park. Come for the reading, stay for our brutal takedown of the Oxford World's Classic: it's more fun than a sailor on a horse!This week's readers: Lucy Brazier, Toby Malone, TJ YoungProgress: 613 pages complete, 15 pages to go; 97.61% read.Contextual NotesBrancusi's Whirligig https://www.themorgan.org/exhibitions/online/ulysses/brancusis-symbol-joyce AO3 James Joyce Fanfic: https://archiveofourown.org/tags/Finnegans%20Wake%20-%20James%20Joyce/works Finnegans Wake and Spongebob Fanfic: https://archiveofourown.org/works/9436142 Mutt and Jeff https://www.loc.gov/exhibitions/comic-art/about-this-exhibition/early-years-1890s-to-1920s/mutt-and-jeff-an-unlikely-pair/Three Castles Burning on early houses: https://threecastlesburning.libsyn.com/the-dawning-of-the-day-last-orders-at-the-early-house Lucy Brazier's website https://portergirl.com/Finnegans What?: Finnegans Wake - A guide by an idiot https://www.amazon.ca/Finnegans-What-Wake-guide-idiot/dp/1092156100/Lucy on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brazierlucy/Lucy on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/@lucybrazierauthor/Lucy on Twitter https://twitter.com/@portergirl100/If Movies Ended When Someone Said the Title: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DMndH8QiI4If Movies Ended When Someone Said the Title Part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzMsbdAQRg4&t=0s If Movies Ended When Someone Said the Title 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yT41rqh-Udk For early drops, community and show notes, join us at our free Patreon, at patreon.com/wakepod, or check out our Linktree, at https://linktr.ee/wake.pod. We welcome comments from everyone: even, nay, especially, the dreaded purists. Come and "um actually" us!
We often do not realize that deep down economics is a battleground of competing anthropologies: implicit or explicit theories of human nature, selfhood and subjectivity, quiet beliefs about how we understand ourselves and our place in the world. In this podcast we bring together researchers from different disciplines that study economic phenomena, systems, agency and behavior, ranging from historians and political philosophers to economic anthropologists and development economists, to scrutinize the protagonist of their discipline: who is the Real Homo Economicus? What kinds of creature are they? What drives their choices and behavior? Are we still talking about the same creature? To get the conversation started we use an experimental method: the Mythlab method. We use stories as a probe into economic thinking and quiet beliefs about the underlying anthropologies. In each episode we give our guest a story and see how they respond to it, and explore assumptions and associations in a playful way. In this fourth and final episode we play with fables, short moralistic tales, often featuring animals, but always addressing a deeper human truth. We talk about The Dog and the Piece of Meat, The Wolf and the Crane, The Hawk and the Nightingale, The Hen with the Golden Eggs, The Cricket and the Ant. What is the moral of these stories? What can animal stories tell us about human nature? And what kind of world is the world of the fable? I try to make sense of these fables with Huub Brouwer. Dr. Huub Brouwer is assistant professor of ethics and political philosophy at Tilburg University. His research is on theories of distributive justice, particularly on desert, responsibility-sensitive egalitarianism, and taxation. Huub is currently carrying out a 4-year research project on philosophy of taxation, funded by the Netherlands Research Council. (https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/nl/medewerkers/h-m-brouwer) Hosted by Dr. Tazuko van Berkel [https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/tazuko-van-berkel#tab-1] and Connor McMullen. Edited and mixed by Connor McMullen. Mythlab team: Dr. Erik Bähre, Dr. Aiste Celkyte, Prof. dr. Lisa Herzog, Connor McMullen, Dr. Sara Polak The Mythlab-project is funded by the Dutch Young Academy. The Dutch Young Academy (https://www.dejongeakademie.nl/en/default.aspx) is a platform of fifty inspired academics who conduct research, advise, share knowledge and bring people together, and who do all this while taking a special interest in young scientists and scholars. .player5176 .plyr__controls, .player5176 .StampAudioPlayerSkin{ border-radius: 10px; overflow: hidden; } .player5176{ margin: 0 auto; } .player5176 .plyr__controls .plyr__controls { border-radius: none; overflow: visible; } .skin_default .player5176 .plyr__controls { overflow: visible; } Your browser does not support the audio element. References: The fables of this episode are taken from ancient fable collections attributed to Aesop, Babrius and Phaedrus.
Henüz taze bir Müslüman olan Felix Officer-Mcintyre Ramazan ayını nasıl geçirdiğini; yeni dininin pratiklerini günlük hayatta nasıl yaşadığını; ailesinin, mensubu olduğu Aborijin toplumunun ve iş arkadaşlarının İslamı seçmesine tepkilerini SBS Türkçe'ye anlattı.
The Ladybug is often associated with luck, renewal, and protection. Across many cultures, this little beetle is seen as a harbinger of blessings and a messenger of positive change! Have you ever had a Ladybug land on you or appear unexpectedly? That could be a spiritual sign! In this episode, we'll explore the Ladybug as a spirit animal, the messages it brings, and how we can weave ladybug magic into our practices.WitchyWorkWishes.comHearth & Hen
Wednesday 3/12/25 – The MCU'S Bleeding Edge is LIVE covering Episode 3 of Daredevil: Born Again on Disney+, produced by Marvel Studios. So far, this series has connected well with the original Netflix show and has been well received. Leading this week's discussion is Co-host Jeff S ($TrueKnowledge), with Co-host Cyberneticshark joining Andres The Pop Culture Guy, Jesse Starcher (The Source Material Comics Podcast on W2M Network), and Hen & John (It's What We Do Podcast) on the guest panel. If you're enjoying our Daredevil coverage on YouTube or in podcast form, please consider supporting us by liking, following, subscribing, and leaving a comment! The MCU'S Bleeding Edge reviews movies and TV series every week with the help of amazing guest creators from all corners of the digital content world! Cybers LINKS- https://www.youtube.com/@cyberneticshark all his links can be found on YT!!Andres LINKS- https://www.youtube.com/@PopCultureguy https://www.youtube.com/@DCMarvelPlusTalkAll The MCU'S Bleeding Edge's LINKShttps://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100090571329875https://www.twitch.tv/themcusbleedingedgehttps://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/the-mcus-bleeding-edgehttps://rumble.com/c/c-1009757https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCREPsCRvzjH0ggYL_Larq1Ahttps://www.tiktok.com/@UCREPsCRvzjH0ggYL_Larq1A https://twitter.com/mcusbleedingedgCo-host Cyberneticshark is using a Logitech BRIO along with Skullcandy headphones, a Audio- Technica AT2020 Condenser Studio Microphone, going through a 2021 Flagship Lenovo Legion 5 Gaming laptop. Co-host Jeff S(TrueKnowledge) is working with a Audio- Technica ATR2100 Condenser Studio Microphone, along with a pair of Audio- Technica Headphones, Logitech BRIO- C920-C922-Streamcam, going through a 2023 MacBook Pro along with using a ACER Nitro 5.
Emily is back from Orlando she talks about her trip and we talk about Mason's Birthday Party. D'Marco called Travis Mr. Hen because of the way Travis was dressed, we talk about Traivs' outfit. Also, Mookie Betts has a "mystery illness" he's lost 23 lbs. and he can't keep food down. How will this illness affect his season? Emily will tells us 2 truths and a lie. Can we catch her lie? And D'Marco takes us into the FARR SIDE. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Episode 65 welcomes special guest, Ljay Geist out of Garden City (KS) FD to the show. We discuss his love for engine work, his recent work with HEN nozzles and his initial impression of the HEN nozzle in interior firefighting. The second half of the episode is a deep dive into leadership specifically from the perspective of those not in formal leadership positions. Ljay lays the groundwork for having a positive impact on your crew, firehouse and organization. This episode is about street level leadership and how to capitalize on it to build better fire departments!
Don't miss this powerful episode of "On the Air with Florenza" as I sit down with Sharon Frances, author of the moving novel in verse, Ash & Feather. Written for upper middle grade and young adult readers, this poignant story uses magical realism to explore mental health, identity, and the journey of growing up queer. Ash & Feather follows fourteen-year-old Phoenix as her world is upended by her parent Eagle's cancer diagnosis. Amidst the uncertainty of surgery, medicine, and school life, Phoenix senses extraordinary changes—itching shoulder blades and wings that seem to grow as her emotions deepen. Through her grief and transformation, Phoenix must rely on the love and wisdom of grandparent Duck, counselor Hen, and sweetheart Ing to navigate a complex world. Will she rise from the ashes and become the bird she's always imagined? This is a conversation about imagination, resilience, and the strength found in relationships. Sharon beautifully crafts a story that is honest and hopeful, blending themes of family, hard conversations, and the power of self-discovery. #SharonJoyFrances #FlorenzaLee #AuthorSpotlight #AshAndFeather #MentalHealthMatters #MagicalRealism #OnTheAirWithFlorenza #BooksForYoungReaders #LGBTQVoices #StorytellingPower
Sermon - Luke 13:31-35 - The Fox and the Hen by Community Lutheran Church
Luke 13:31-35At that very hour some Pharisees came and said to him, “Get away from here, for Herod wants to kill you.” He said to them, “Go and tell that fox for me, ‘Listen, I am casting out demons and performing cures today and tomorrow, and on the third day I finish my work. Yet today, tomorrow, and the next day I must be on my way, because it is impossible for a prophet to be killed outside of Jerusalem.' Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often have I desired to gather your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing! See, your house is left to you. And I tell you, you will not see me until the time comes when you say, ‘Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord.' ” We lie to our children. That is one thing I've learned in my brief two years of parenting. Most of them are innocent, harmless lies—if there is such a thing. “There are no more cookies, Clive! Mickey Mouse is going to sleep too. Oh sorry buddy, that toy is broken. Yes, that's chicken, it's chicken, just eat it!” Those are some of the more common ones in my household. I'm sure you have, or had, your own in your home. Or maybe you remember some that your parents told you. And if you are sitting here saying, "Well, I never lied to my kids," or “my parents never lied to me," I hate to break it to you, but you're lying right now and yes they did.This is not to shame any of us or to make you look at your own parents in a different light. Most of the time, the lies are told out of protection, care, and concern. We don't want our kids to bear the weight of whatever it is: Spot went to live on a farm or Mommy and Daddy were just talking. This is normal and well-intentioned, no doubt. However, according to the novelist Allison Grant, there are some lies we tell, however well-intentioned, that do more harm than good.This past week, Allison wrote an op-ed in the New York Times about one of those lies—one she says she'll never tell her children—and that is about pain. When something will hurt and how much. Now, I am sure you have a story about a time you told a white lie about how much something would hurt and everything turned out fine. Well, that wasn't the case for Allison.She was born with one leg shorter than the other, by about three inches. When she was 11, she underwent a complex corrective procedure. Over 13 hours, surgeons drilled holes through her bones and attached a metal frame from the outside of her hip to her toe. For the next two years, the frame helped stretch Allison's leg those three inches. Before the surgery, when she asked if it was going to hurt, she remembers being told, “Don't worry, we have ways to manage any unpleasantness.” Reassuring, yes, but it skirted around the truth. Those two years, Allison was in excruciating pain, so much so that morphine, valium, and muscle relaxants were all needed on a regular basis just to mask it a bit.Reflecting on that experience, Allison writes, “The difference between what I was told and what I experienced shattered my faith in doctors and left me questioning whether I could trust adults at all. Now, as a parent—and through my years working in health care—I've made the conscious decision never to lie to people about pain.” Even with something small, she says, she is realistic about the pain they likely will encounter.This is not a sermon about parenting or about not lying to kids. I certainly don't have all that figured out yet. Rather, I hope this lens of honesty on pain and danger helps us see how God, like a good parent, doesn't lie to us about the danger and pain we'll face—and how that truth sets us free.We all want to protect people we love from pain. But what if real love tells the truth, even about the pain? I'd like to think that's what God did for Jesus. God was honest with Jesus about his life, his ministry, and the suffering, too. God didn't protect him from Herods or sugarcoat the cross. And yet—Jesus walked ahead to Jerusalem.That is where we find Jesus in our story today. Teaching and healing from town to town on his way to the holy city when some guys come up and say, “You need to leave right now, Herod wants to kill you!” And Jesus responds with one of the best lines in all the Bible, “Tell that fox that I've got work to do, so just try to stop me.”Don't you wish you could respond like that? Such confidence, such disregard for danger. Make no mistake—Herod was a very real and present danger who could invoke great pain. By this point in the story, he's already thrown John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin, in jail and then beheaded him! But here in this scene, Jesus—the guy who always says, "Be not afraid"—shows all of us exactly what being not afraid looks like. “Sorry, Herod, I gotta keep going. I have work to accomplish, and you won't stop me.”Don't you want that? I mean, how is it that Jesus can face such danger, can be threatened with such pain, and not even flinch? I'd like to think, in part, it's because God the Father was honest with Jesus, his only Son. That in the many hours of prayer and discernment, God told Jesus everything about the life and work that was before him. How he would cure people and cast out demons. How he would go to Jerusalem, though foxes would try to stop him. How he would hang on a cross if he chose—but that wouldn't be the end because God promised resurrection.God didn't lie about the pain and the danger. And because Jesus knew what was coming, he could face it all head-on, unafraid, trusting in the promises God had made him. We might not ever be as fearless as Jesus, because well we aren't Jesus. But I do think God in Jesus is honest with us, too, about what we will face in our lives. And we hear that in this passage.There will always be foxes and Herods that are a real danger to us. We will face pain in this life. But here, Jesus makes another promise to us, one that can help us face the foxes. As a mother hen gathers her chicks under her wing, so does Jesus desire to gather and cover you.Notice I say cover you, not protect you. If you've spent any time around chickens, you know that a hen can't actually protect her chicks from a fox. Those wings don't do much of anything against razor sharp teeth and fast claws. And so you might think, “well what good is that then?!” If foxes and danger are inevitable, and a hen can't truly keep her chicks safe, then what good is thinking of God as a Hen? Of all the animals Jesus could have picked to describe himself, why choose a mother hen?Because a hen's love is stronger than any fear a fox instills. She will do all she can to cover her chicks, even gathering them with her wings while she gives up her own life to the fox. We all have foxes. The grief that lingers long after the funeral. The resentment or silence that frays marriages now barely hanging on by a thread. The words said or left unsaid that strain our friendships and families. The overwhelming pressure of raising children—how much screen time is too much, how to balance work and home, how to not fail them. The fear that no matter how hard we try, we are not enough. These foxes creep close, circling, threatening to undo us. But hear this promise: you are not left alone. You are gathered. You are covered. You are sheltered beneath the outstretched wings of Christ, alongside others just as weary as you. And in that love, we don't find protection from the foxes, but courage. Jesus lays down his life so that we can live—not in fear, but with trust and in the promise of resurrection. The foxes do not get the last word.We cannot lie our way out of life's pain, not to ourselves and not to our children. Allison ends that op-ed piece saying “We should tell our kids when it's going to hurt. In the long run, it will hurt them a whole lot less.” That's what God does with us, not to hurt us but to free us from fear and face the pain and danger in this world, trusting also that we do not face the pain alone. We have each other and we have the love that covers us, love that casts out fear. Amen.
LES 73Ik wil dat er licht is.Vandaag staan we stil bij de wil die jij deelt met God. Dit is niet hetzelfde als de ijdele wensen van het ego waaruit het duister voortkomt en het niets. De wil die jij deelt met God heeft alle scheppingskracht in zich. De ijdele wensen van het ego worden niet gedeeld en missen daardoor alle kracht. Zijn wensen zijn niet loos in die zin dat ze een wereld van illusies kunnen maken, waarin jij heel sterk geloven kunt. Maar ze zijn inderdaad loos waar het om schepping gaat. Ze maken niets wat werkelijk is.IJdele wensen en grieven zijn elkaars partners, ofwel mede-makers in het verbeelden van de wereld die jij ziet. De wensen van het ego hebben haar doen ontstaan, en de behoefte van het ego aan grieven, die nodig zijn om haar in stand te houden, bevolkt haar met figuren die jou schijnen aan te vallen en die een ‘rechtvaardig' oordeel eisen. Deze figuren worden de tussenpersonen die het ego gebruikt om handel te drijven in grieven. Ze staan tussen jouw bewustzijn en de werkelijkheid van je broeders in. Wanneer je hen ziet, ken jij noch je broeders, noch je Zelf.Jouw wil is voor jou verloren geraakt in deze vreemde ruilhandel, waarin schuld over en weer verhandeld wordt en het aantal grieven toeneemt bij elke ruil. Kan zo'n wereld geschapen zijn door de Wil die de Zoon van God met zijn Vader deelt? Heeft God rampspoed voor Zijn Zoon geschapen? Scheppen is de Wil van Beiden tezamen. Zou God een wereld scheppen die Hemzelf zou doden?Vandaag zullen we opnieuw proberen de wereld te bereiken die in overeenstemming is met jouw wil. Het licht bevindt zich erin, omdat ze de Wil van God niet weerstaat. Het is niet de Hemel, maar het licht van de Hemel schijnt erop. De duisternis is verdwenen. De ijdele wensen van het ego zijn ingetrokken. Maar het licht dat op deze wereld schijnt, weerspiegelt jouw wil en dus zullen we er in jou naar moeten zoeken.Jouw beeld van de wereld kan alleen maar een weerspiegeling zijn van wat er binnen jou is. Noch de bron van het licht, noch van de duisternis kan buiten jou worden gevonden. Grieven verduisteren je denkgeest en je kijkt uit over een verduisterde wereld. Vergeving heft die duisternis op, doet jouw wil opnieuw gelden en laat jou kijken naar een wereld van licht. We hebben herhaaldelijk beklemtoond dat de barrière van grieven makkelijk te nemen valt en niet tussen jou en je verlossing in kan staan. De reden hiervan is heel eenvoudig. Wil je werkelijk in de hel zijn? Wil je werkelijk treuren en lijden en sterven?Vergeet de argumenten van het ego, die proberen te bewijzen dat dit alles werkelijk de Hemel is. Jij weet dat dit niet zo is. Jij kunt dit voor jezelf niet wensen. Er is een punt dat illusies niet kunnen passeren. Lijden is geen geluk, en geluk is wat jij werkelijk wenst. Dat is in waarheid jouw wil. En dus is verlossing eveneens jouw wil. Je wenst te slagen in wat we vandaag proberen te doen. We ondernemen het met jouw zegen en hartelijke instemming.We zullen vandaag slagen als jij onthoudt dat je voor jezelf verlossing wenst. Je wenst Gods plan te aanvaarden omdat jij erin deelt. Jij hebt geen wil die zich daar werkelijk tegen kan verzetten, en je wenst dat ook niet. Verlossing komt jou toe. Boven alles wens jij de vrijheid om je te herinneren Wie jij werkelijk bent. Vandaag is het ‘t ego dat machteloos staat tegenover jouw wil. Jouw wil is vrij en niets kan daarover zegevieren.Daarom doen we de oefeningen voor vandaag in blij vertrouwen, in de zekerheid dat we zullen vinden wat je wilt vinden, en dat we ons zullen herinneren wat je je wilt herinneren. IJdele wensen kunnen ons niet tegenhouden, of ons misleiden met een illusie van kracht. Laat vandaag jouw wil geschieden en maak voorgoed een eind aan het waanzinnige geloof dat je de hel in plaats van de Hemel kiest.We beginnen onze langere oefenperioden met de erkenning dat Gods verlossingsplan, en alleen het Zijne, volledig in overeenstemming is met jouw wil. Het is niet het doel van een vreemde macht, dat jou onvrijwillig wordt opgedrongen. Het is het enige doel hier waarover jij en je Vader volmaakt in overeenstemming verkeren. Jij zult slagen vandaag, het tijdstip dat is vastgesteld voor de bevrijding van Gods Zoon van de hel en van alle ijdele wensen. Nu wordt hij zich opnieuw van zijn wil bewust. Hij is bereid op déze dag het licht in hemzelf te aanschouwen en te worden verlost.Nadat je jezelf hieraan herinnerd hebt en je vast hebt voorgenomen om helder in gedachten te houden wat jouw wil is, zeg je met zachte vastberadenheid en rustige zekerheid tegen jezelf:Ik wil dat er licht is. Laat me het licht aanschouwen dat Gods Wil en de mijne weerspiegelt.Laat dan jouw wil zich doen gelden, één met de kracht van God en verenigd met jouw Zelf. Stel de rest van de oefenperiode onder Hun leiding. Ga met Hen mee waar Zij je voorgaan.Leg in de korte oefenperioden opnieuw een verklaring af van wat jij werkelijk wenst. Zeg:Ik wil dat er licht is. Duisternis is niet mijn wil.Dit moet verscheidene keren per uur worden herhaald. Het is echter van het grootste belang dat het idee van vandaag onmiddellijk in deze vorm wordt toegepast op het moment dat jij in de verleiding komt enige vorm van grieven te koesteren. Dit zal jou helpen je grieven te laten varen in plaats van vast te houden en in het donker te verbergen.
Leus Capital, mobil uygulama stüdyolarının herhangi bir hisse, sahiplik veya teminat göstermeden finansmana erişerek büyümesini sağlıyor. Henüz operasyonlarına yeni başlamasına rağmen 15'ten fazla stüdyoya finansman desteği sunan Leus Capital'in kurucusu Halil İbrahim Özdemir ile ürünlerini ve gelecek hedeflerini konuştuk. Swipeline Podcast'in 221. bölüm konuğu Leus Capital'ın kurucusu Halil İbrahim Özdemir. Leus Capital: https://leus.capital/ Halil İbrahim Özdemir: https://www.linkedin.com/in/halilibrahimozemir/ 00:00 - Swipeline Intro 00:45 - Leus Capital ne yapıyor? 04:50 - Tutar nasıl belirleniyor? 09:25 - Ekip ve önceki tecrübeler 11:35 - Ürünler 14:10 - Operasyona ne zaman başladınız? 15:05 - Siz finansmanı nasıl sağlıyorsunuz? 16:30 - Katma değerler 17:26 - Stüdyoların Türkiye'ye taşınması 20:53 - Leus ve Ludus'un birlikte çalışması 22:47 - Gelecek hedefleri 25:13 - Swipeline Outro -
⬥GUEST⬥Sarah Fluchs, CTO at admeritia | CRA Expert Group at EU Commission | On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-fluchs/⬥HOST⬥Host: Sean Martin, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine [@ITSPmagazine] and Host of Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast [@RedefiningCyber] | On ITSPmagazine: https://www.itspmagazine.com/sean-martin⬥EPISODE NOTES⬥The European Commission's Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) introduces a regulatory framework designed to improve the security of digital products sold within the European Union. In a recent episode of Redefining CyberSecurity, host Sean Martin spoke with Sarah Fluchs, Chief Technology Officer at admeritia and a member of the CRA expert group at the EU Commission. Fluchs, who has spent her career in industrial control system cybersecurity, offers critical insights into what the CRA means for manufacturers, retailers, and consumers.A Broad Scope: More Than Just Industrial AutomationUnlike previous security regulations that focused on specific sectors, the CRA applies to virtually all digital products. Fluchs emphasizes that if a device is digital and sold in the EU, it likely falls under the CRA's requirements. From smartwatches and baby monitors to firewalls and industrial control systems, the regulation covers a wide array of consumer and business-facing products.The CRA also extends beyond just hardware—software and services required for product functionality (such as cloud-based components) are also in scope. This broad application is part of what makes the regulation so impactful. Manufacturers now face mandatory cybersecurity requirements that will shape product design, development, and post-sale support.What the CRA RequiresThe CRA introduces mandatory cybersecurity standards across the product lifecycle. Manufacturers will need to:Ensure products are free from known, exploitable vulnerabilities at the time of release.Implement security by design, considering cybersecurity from the earliest stages of product development.Provide security patches for the product's defined lifecycle, with a minimum of five years unless justified otherwise.Maintain a vulnerability disclosure process, ensuring consumers and authorities are informed of security risks.Include cybersecurity documentation, requiring manufacturers to provide detailed security instructions to users.Fluchs notes that these requirements align with established security best practices. For businesses already committed to cybersecurity, the CRA should feel like a structured extension of what they are already doing, rather than a disruptive change.Compliance Challenges: No Detailed Checklist YetOne of the biggest concerns among manufacturers is the lack of detailed compliance guidance. While other EU regulations provide extensive technical specifications, the CRA's security requirements span just one and a half pages. This ambiguity is intentional—it allows flexibility across different industries—but it also creates uncertainty.To address this, the EU will introduce harmonized standards to help manufacturers interpret the CRA. However, with tight deadlines, many of these standards may not be ready before enforcement begins. As a result, companies will need to conduct their own cybersecurity risk assessments and demonstrate due diligence in securing their products.The Impact on Critical Infrastructure and Industrial SystemsWhile the CRA is not specifically a critical infrastructure regulation, it has major implications for industrial environments. Operators of critical systems, such as utilities and manufacturing plants, will benefit from stronger security in the components they rely on.Fluchs highlights that many security gaps in industrial environments stem from weak product security. The CRA aims to fix this by ensuring that manufacturers, rather than operators, bear the responsibility for secure-by-design components. This shift could significantly reduce cybersecurity risks for organizations that rely on complex supply chains.A Security Milestone: Holding Manufacturers AccountableThe CRA represents a fundamental shift in cybersecurity responsibility. For the first time, manufacturers, importers, and retailers must guarantee the security of their products or risk being banned from selling in the EU.Fluchs points out that while the burden of compliance is significant, the benefits for consumers and businesses will be substantial. Security-conscious companies may even gain a competitive advantage, as customers start to prioritize products that meet CRA security standards.For those in the industry wondering how strictly the EU will enforce compliance, Fluchs reassures that the goal is not to punish manufacturers for small mistakes. Instead, the EU Commission aims to improve cybersecurity without unnecessary bureaucracy.The Bottom LineThe Cyber Resilience Act is set to reshape cybersecurity expectations for digital products. While manufacturers face new compliance challenges, consumers and businesses will benefit from stronger security measures, better vulnerability management, and increased transparency.Want to learn more? Listen to the full episode of Redefining CyberSecurity with Sean Martin and Sarah Fluchs to hear more insights into the CRA and what it means for the future of cybersecurity.⬥SPONSORS⬥LevelBlue: https://itspm.ag/attcybersecurity-3jdk3ThreatLocker: https://itspm.ag/threatlocker-r974⬥RESOURCES⬥Inspiring Post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sarah-fluchs_aaand-its-official-the-cyber-resilience-activity-7250162223493300224-zECA/Adopted CRA text: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-100-2023-INIT/en/pdfA list of Sarah's blog posts to get your CRA knowledge up to speed:1️⃣ Introduction to the CRA, the CE marking, and the regulatory ecosystem around it: https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/eu-cyber-resilience-act-9e092fffbd732️⃣ Explanation how the standards ("harmonised European norms, hEN") are defined that will detail the actual cybersecurity requirements in the CRA (2023): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/what-cybersecurity-standards-will-products-in-the-eu-soon-have-to-meet-590854ba3c8c3️⃣ Overview of the essential requirements outlined in the CRA (2024): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/what-the-cyber-resilience-act-requires-from-manufacturers-0ee0b917d2094️⃣ Overview of the global product security regulation landscape and how the CRA fits into it (2024): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/product-security-regulation-in-2024-93ddc6dd89005️⃣ Good-practice example for the "information and instructions to the user," one of the central documentations that need to be written for CRA compliance and the only one that must be provided to the product's users (2024): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/how-to-be-cra-compliant-and-make-your-critical-infrastructure-clients-happy-441ecd859f52⬥ADDITIONAL INFORMATION⬥✨ More Redefining CyberSecurity:
⬥GUEST⬥Sarah Fluchs, CTO at admeritia | CRA Expert Group at EU Commission | On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-fluchs/⬥HOST⬥Host: Sean Martin, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine [@ITSPmagazine] and Host of Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast [@RedefiningCyber] | On ITSPmagazine: https://www.itspmagazine.com/sean-martin⬥EPISODE NOTES⬥The European Commission's Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) introduces a regulatory framework designed to improve the security of digital products sold within the European Union. In a recent episode of Redefining CyberSecurity, host Sean Martin spoke with Sarah Fluchs, Chief Technology Officer at admeritia and a member of the CRA expert group at the EU Commission. Fluchs, who has spent her career in industrial control system cybersecurity, offers critical insights into what the CRA means for manufacturers, retailers, and consumers.A Broad Scope: More Than Just Industrial AutomationUnlike previous security regulations that focused on specific sectors, the CRA applies to virtually all digital products. Fluchs emphasizes that if a device is digital and sold in the EU, it likely falls under the CRA's requirements. From smartwatches and baby monitors to firewalls and industrial control systems, the regulation covers a wide array of consumer and business-facing products.The CRA also extends beyond just hardware—software and services required for product functionality (such as cloud-based components) are also in scope. This broad application is part of what makes the regulation so impactful. Manufacturers now face mandatory cybersecurity requirements that will shape product design, development, and post-sale support.What the CRA RequiresThe CRA introduces mandatory cybersecurity standards across the product lifecycle. Manufacturers will need to:Ensure products are free from known, exploitable vulnerabilities at the time of release.Implement security by design, considering cybersecurity from the earliest stages of product development.Provide security patches for the product's defined lifecycle, with a minimum of five years unless justified otherwise.Maintain a vulnerability disclosure process, ensuring consumers and authorities are informed of security risks.Include cybersecurity documentation, requiring manufacturers to provide detailed security instructions to users.Fluchs notes that these requirements align with established security best practices. For businesses already committed to cybersecurity, the CRA should feel like a structured extension of what they are already doing, rather than a disruptive change.Compliance Challenges: No Detailed Checklist YetOne of the biggest concerns among manufacturers is the lack of detailed compliance guidance. While other EU regulations provide extensive technical specifications, the CRA's security requirements span just one and a half pages. This ambiguity is intentional—it allows flexibility across different industries—but it also creates uncertainty.To address this, the EU will introduce harmonized standards to help manufacturers interpret the CRA. However, with tight deadlines, many of these standards may not be ready before enforcement begins. As a result, companies will need to conduct their own cybersecurity risk assessments and demonstrate due diligence in securing their products.The Impact on Critical Infrastructure and Industrial SystemsWhile the CRA is not specifically a critical infrastructure regulation, it has major implications for industrial environments. Operators of critical systems, such as utilities and manufacturing plants, will benefit from stronger security in the components they rely on.Fluchs highlights that many security gaps in industrial environments stem from weak product security. The CRA aims to fix this by ensuring that manufacturers, rather than operators, bear the responsibility for secure-by-design components. This shift could significantly reduce cybersecurity risks for organizations that rely on complex supply chains.A Security Milestone: Holding Manufacturers AccountableThe CRA represents a fundamental shift in cybersecurity responsibility. For the first time, manufacturers, importers, and retailers must guarantee the security of their products or risk being banned from selling in the EU.Fluchs points out that while the burden of compliance is significant, the benefits for consumers and businesses will be substantial. Security-conscious companies may even gain a competitive advantage, as customers start to prioritize products that meet CRA security standards.For those in the industry wondering how strictly the EU will enforce compliance, Fluchs reassures that the goal is not to punish manufacturers for small mistakes. Instead, the EU Commission aims to improve cybersecurity without unnecessary bureaucracy.The Bottom LineThe Cyber Resilience Act is set to reshape cybersecurity expectations for digital products. While manufacturers face new compliance challenges, consumers and businesses will benefit from stronger security measures, better vulnerability management, and increased transparency.Want to learn more? Listen to the full episode of Redefining CyberSecurity with Sean Martin and Sarah Fluchs to hear more insights into the CRA and what it means for the future of cybersecurity.⬥SPONSORS⬥LevelBlue: https://itspm.ag/attcybersecurity-3jdk3ThreatLocker: https://itspm.ag/threatlocker-r974⬥RESOURCES⬥Inspiring Post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sarah-fluchs_aaand-its-official-the-cyber-resilience-activity-7250162223493300224-zECA/Adopted CRA text: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-100-2023-INIT/en/pdfA list of Sarah's blog posts to get your CRA knowledge up to speed:1️⃣ Introduction to the CRA, the CE marking, and the regulatory ecosystem around it: https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/eu-cyber-resilience-act-9e092fffbd732️⃣ Explanation how the standards ("harmonised European norms, hEN") are defined that will detail the actual cybersecurity requirements in the CRA (2023): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/what-cybersecurity-standards-will-products-in-the-eu-soon-have-to-meet-590854ba3c8c3️⃣ Overview of the essential requirements outlined in the CRA (2024): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/what-the-cyber-resilience-act-requires-from-manufacturers-0ee0b917d2094️⃣ Overview of the global product security regulation landscape and how the CRA fits into it (2024): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/product-security-regulation-in-2024-93ddc6dd89005️⃣ Good-practice example for the "information and instructions to the user," one of the central documentations that need to be written for CRA compliance and the only one that must be provided to the product's users (2024): https://fluchsfriction.medium.com/how-to-be-cra-compliant-and-make-your-critical-infrastructure-clients-happy-441ecd859f52⬥ADDITIONAL INFORMATION⬥✨ More Redefining CyberSecurity:
The American Studies Association has boycotted Israeli academic institutions since 2013. The Association for the Advancement of Anthropology has refrained from formal collaborations with Israeli academic institutions. And just this past summer, the American Association of University Professors opened the door to academic boycotts against Israel. Enter: two scientists at MIT who see firsthand the consequences of academic boycotts and the damage it can cause to scholarship and scientific progress. To ensure Israeli scholars and their American colleagues can collaborate freely, and foster research and innovation that benefits all of humanity, they formed The Kalaniyot Foundation (pronounced Ka-la-nee-yought), named after Israel's national flower. Hear from Drs. Or Hen and Ernest Fraenkel, co-founders of this initiative, on the impact of anti-Israel boycotts on academic collaboration with Israeli scholars, and what they're doing to rehabilitate the reputation of Israeli researchers in the eyes of the world. Listen – AJC Podcasts: The Forgotten Exodus: with Hen Mazzig, Einat Admony, and more. People of the Pod: U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff on Gaza Reconstruction, Israeli Security, and the Future of Middle East Diplomacy Why Germany's Antisemitic Far-Right Party is Thriving Instead of Disappearing Follow People of the Pod on your favorite podcast app, and learn more at AJC.org/PeopleofthePod You can reach us at: peopleofthepod@ajc.org If you've appreciated this episode, please be sure to tell your friends, and rate and review us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. __ Transcript of Conversation with Drs. Or Hen and Ernest Fraenkel: Manya Brachear Pashman: Since the Hamas terror attacks of October 7, 2023 many university campuses have been riven by anti-Israel protests, demonstrations, often unfortunately fueled by disinformation and rife with rhetoric that too often crosses the line into antisemitism. But even before October 7, Israeli scholarship had become a target of the boycott divestment sanctions movement. The American Studies Association has boycotted Israeli academic institutions since 2013. The Association for the Advancement of Anthropology has refrained from formal collaborations with Israeli academic institutions. Even study abroad programs that give students an opportunity to live and study in Israel have come under scrutiny. Enter: two scientists at MIT who see firsthand the consequences of academic boycotts and the damage it can cause to scholarship and scientific progress. To ensure Israeli scholars and their American colleagues can collaborate freely, foster research and innovation that benefits all of humanity, they formed The Kalaniyot Foundation, named after Israel's national flower. Dr. Or Hen and Ernest Fraenkel are with us now to discuss this initiative. Dr. Hen, Dr. Fraenkel, welcome to People of the Pod. Ernest Fraenkel: Thank you very much. Manya Brachear Pashman: So I want to work backward here a bit with a purpose. I want to start by sharing with our audience a little about your research. Dr Fraenkel, you work in health science, technology. What is the goal of your research and scholarship? Are there particular diseases you're trying to cure or treat? Ernest Fraenkel: We are interested in the diseases that are the hardest to treat, ones like Alzheimer's, ALS, Parkinson's, where we don't really know the root cause, and we believe that by gathering many different kinds of data about genes and molecules, about RNA and also about people's lived experience of these diseases, and using computational models, we can identify new targets for drugs and hopefully better therapies. Manya Brachear Pashman: Have you collaborated with Israeli scientists on this? Ernest Fraenkel: Yes, we collaborate with quite a few scientists all over the world, including top researchers in Israel. Manya Brachear Pashman: And Dr. Hen, you are a nuclear physicist, and you study the strongest force in nature, right? What is the goal of your research? Or Hen: So my research is very much on the fundamental curiosity driven science side of things, I am trying to understand how the fundamental building blocks of matter come about. We're building a new particle collider in the US called the electron hand collider. It's a $3 billion project funded by the Department of Energy, where we will try to understand why the proton and from that nucleus and all of us have mass. Trying to understand how we get the proton to a specific spin, which is the reason that we can go into an MRI machine and image ourselves. And I also try to understand things like, how do protons and neutrons interact with each other at extremely short distances, which tell us about exotic phenomena in the universe, like neutron stars. So trying to understand, really, the fundamental building blocks of matter and how they come about. Manya Brachear Pashman: Wow. And is there promising scholarship in this realm in Israel? Or Hen: Yes, there's quite a few groups working in this area. I did my own training in Israel. I am a graduate of the Hebrew University for undergrad and Tel Aviv University for grad school. And actually, ever since I came to MIT, I've still been collaborating with colleagues from Technion, Tel Aviv, Hebrew University, Weizmann, Ben Gurion. I've always had a strong collaboration with Israel, actually. Manya Brachear Pashman: So after October 7, or maybe even leading up to it, what were you seeing when it came to support of Israeli scholarship and collaboration in your institutions, in your fields, in academia in general? Ernest Fraenkel: I think before October 7, we were living in a bit of a bubble, because MIT is a special place which is very deeply immersed in science and technology. Where really, quite honestly, before October 7, I had no hint that there were biases against Israel, Israelis or Jews. I know that was not the experience in many other areas, especially in other fields. But things really turned 180 degrees on October 7, and what we've seen since then has been deeply disturbing. That some of the boycotts that have been bubbling for years in the humanities suddenly burst forth into the sciences and the engineering fields in ways that are both global and also very local. Seeing bias against individual researchers inside laboratories, as well as these kind of blanket attempts to boycott Israel. Manya Brachear Pashman: And Dr Hen, did you see the same? Or Hen: Yes, definitely. I work with a lot of international collaborations, actually, within collaborations, because there's structured bodies with bylaws and rules, It was very hard for anyone to object the presence of Israeli researchers. But what we have observed in many places is peer to peer collaborations dying down. We've seen a very significant social tax being applied to people who continue to collaborate with Israelis, and honestly, maybe in contrast a bit to what we know from academic boycotts in other areas, but are very much politically driven, within the STEM, within exact sciences, biosciences, etc, the social taxing is actually much stronger because we are people who usually instead, people keep a very clear separation between the politics and then, you know what they view from the work in the lab, which is very clear and data driven, and not a lot of room for opinions. It's very much exact. But on the other hand, the second that walking within Israel, and you know collaborating with Israel, is start costing other corporations, other people will now not work, then you get a problem. And that's what people really avoid and that's how an academic boycott within the STEM areas is progressing. It's a very deeply bound social tax that is just running in the air of the institutions. Manya Brachear Pashman: So what is the Kalaniyot Foundation doing to promote these collaborations? Can you give us some specific examples, or projects or partnerships? Or Hen: Yeah, so one of the things that we really believe in is that, at the end of the day, actually, what we see, also data shows, is, well, there is existing strong collaboration, that peer to peer, that person to person connection, is so strong that it's very hard to break that. You can go into my department and you can talk to people about Israel. And they know Or, and they know the person, right? And they might have a positive opinion about, you know, negative opinion about me. But whatever that opinion is, right, it's stronger than anything. They will try to protest and say, Okay, maybe there's a political issue. But you know, we know the researcher. We know the scientists. We know our colleagues. So the approach of Kalaniyot is to actually bring in more Israelis to campus, to bring in brilliant people who are excellent researchers that will come and enrich the academic environment, first and foremost, through this quality, and second, by the people that they are. Maybe Ernest, you want to continue with this? Ernest Fraenkel: So it's really this dual mission. We think that if we bring more top notch Israeli scholars to us campuses, it will normalize interaction with Israelis, humanize the Israeli, but there's a problem, right? Because if you just bring Israelis into campus environments that are hostile, they won't thrive. Many of them won't want to come, right? And so the other piece of it that's necessary is to build community, and that's something that we've been doing since October 7 of last year, trying to figure out how to do that, and what we found is face to face interaction is really critical. And so at MIT, we've been having weekly lunches of the Israelis, Jews, allies, everybody who felt isolated and left out of society by all the protests that were taking place. And the beautiful thing is that that started as a reaction, right, a sort of a safe place to retreat to, and it's actually become a wonderful, positive place. And still, now, you know, so far into this crisis, people are coming, and actually the numbers are even growing. And so on a typical week, we get more than 100 people in person. We, of course, feed them lunch, and it's just a wonderful place where you can make friendships, develop academic collaborations, and Israelis realize that there is a community here that appreciates them and welcomes them and it helps them thrive. Manya Brachear Pashman: Because, of course, food is a vital currency, both on college campuses as well in Jewish as in Jewish life. Food heals all. But I am curious, do you? In addition to building these thriving communities, are you also so that people are surrounded and comfortable but are you also trying to build bridges with people who perhaps do tend to throw the word Israeli around in a negative capacity, but you need to actually have some face to face contact. Or is that really not the purpose of Kalaniyot. Or Hen: I mean, it's a yes and a no. We certainly have done that, right. So if you think about how it all started very soon after October 7, basically after the first protest on campus at MIT. We went to talk to our president, three Jewish Israeli faculty, and we asked her. We said, Look, we hear from the students about what's happening in the dorms, what they're experiencing. It's really bad, and it's very hard to handle through the existing mechanisms. Please actually give us the budget. We'll get kosher food. I'm a Mizrahi, that's what I know how to do, feed people. Let's put everybody together, and let's make sure everybody feel welcome. And we also said, you know, we'll be your bridge. We'll help the students communicate with administration through our guidance, right? We'll be able to filter, to guide them, but also to pick up on the important things that you need to know. But then we said something else. We said, Look, this is going to become very tough, also for the students who are protesting out there right now. It was before Israel responded, but we knew exactly what happened in the kibbutzim, and we knew this is not going to be just another round with Gaza. This is going to be something different. So we actually suggested to the President that alongside starting our group, we will start a parallel group of peers who we might disagree with politically and have different perspectives on the Middle East, but we know that they are reasonable people that we can talk to, that we can collaborate with, that we can work with, despite or alongside disagreements. And so the idea was to start our lunch, to start a second lunch, and slowly, through the faculty leadership, bring the groups together. Some of it has worked. Some of it didn't work. We used to meet once a week as the faculty and say, students tell us that this and this is happening. Can you maybe walk with your students to tone that down, and they would tell us what's bothering them, etc. Getting the students to come together, that was a bigger lift, a challenging one. And there was another initiative that came about called the Third Space Lunch, that maybe Ernest can elaborate more on. Ernest Fraenkel: So just to add a little bit to that. So the faculty leads from the other group came to speak to our students. Were very respectful to them. The faculty listened quietly to the concerns of the Jewish students. And I think we did see an attempt by many of the faculty to bridge the gaps. Obviously, faculty are an extremely, you know, diverse group. We have extremists, we've got centrists, we've got moderates. And not everybody was trying to help, but many, many were, and I think that was very encouraging, and I've seen that continue throughout this. There are hidden allies. Probaby the average faculty member probably doesn't really want to know too much about Israel or Palestine. Doesn't want to have to understand the conflicts. They just want to go about their daily lives, teach what they love to teach, do the research they love to do, and they are natural allies in trying to bring order back to campus. And the more that we can engage them, the better off it is. Or Hen: But I think in terms of the formal program for Kalaniyot - Kalaniyot is really meant to bring in researchers and make sure that they have a supporting environment. And if people want to take that extra step of building bridges and building, that's all great, but it's not kind of a mandatory part of the program. Manya Brachear Pashman: I get it. You really just want to foster academic research and progress and innovation, right? Put political strife aside. You've named this foundation Kalaniyot after Israel's national flower. Can you describe for our listeners that flower and why you chose that name for this initiative? Ernest Fraenkel: The Kalaniyah looks a lot like a poppy. It's a red poppy, and during good times, there actually was an annual festival where Israelis would flock to the south in the area right around Gaza to see the bloom of this flower that would cover the otherwise fairly barren, quite honestly, countryside. And it was called the South Red, Darom Adom, and people would rush there to see it. And it was a symbol, which actually takes place right around the time we're recording. People have been sending us photos from from Israel the last few weeks of these flowers, the more they hear about the program. And it's a sign that the winter is going to end and spring is going to come, and everything will be renewed. And so it was the South in red, in a sense, that was all positive. And we think the same sort of thing is possible here, that while Israel is right now a touch point for conflict on campus, we want to see a time when Israel, this is something like, Oh, of course. You know, everybody wants to have some connection to Israel. That's where the best researchers are in every field. I often tell the story, when I was first on the faculty here, one of my first assignees as an undergraduate advisee was somebody from Hawaii, and he told me, asked him what he was going to do this summer, and he said he's going to Israel. So no, really, what's, what's your connection to Israel? He said, Oh, I don't have any I thought, maybe he's a strong Christian. I asked him about that. Said, no, no, I don't have any particular faith. I just heard it's startup nation, and I want to go and experience it. And I just think, how many students today is their first association with Israel, startup nation? Probably not that many anymore, but we can get back to that and realize that it's more than startups, right? It's basic science, it's the arts, it's culture. And so there's much that Israel has to offer the world, and we want to get back to the point where that's the first thing people think about Israel. Manya Brachear Pashman: So this initiative did start at MIT, but it appears to be sprouting, to use a pun, it appears to be sprouting on other campuses. Dartmouth is developing a chapter and Penn, right, the University of Pennsylvania. Are they being led by fellow scientists who have seen the consequence of this scholastic snub, for lack of a better word? Ernest Fraenkel: So at each university, and there are several others in the works that are still working their way through the administration at each university, and by the way, this is not a renegade effort. At each university, the faculty form a faculty board, we encourage them to find a diverse group. So it's not all the sciences on our board. And on those boards, there seem to be many members of humanities departments. Not all Jews, not all Israelis. And these diverse faculty boards are people who are allied with the goals, and we have bylaws. This is a program entirely about positivity. It's not attempting to suppress anybody else's speech. It's not attempting to make any political points. It's a purely academic program that will help restore the image of Israel as a place of academic excellence and help the United States maintain its academic edge through those collaborations. Or Hen: And I think you're hitting on a very unique point, right? And that is that this is entirely faculty led program. When you think about the role of faculty in universities, especially faculty from STEM fields, right, we don't lead a lot of things in the academic world that are not our research, right? Honestly, that's kind of, why am I here and not in Google, right? I would probably make a much bigger salary for Google these days. I'm here because I really care about my research, those open questions I really want to explore, and that's what I'm doing. So I'm teaching my class, and I'm focusing on my research. And me is everybody else around me, that's what we do. So there is a very high activation energy to get the faculty to do something that is not their research, their own research, but once you do that, faculty is a force of nature at the university. That's kind of what we're here to stay, right? We'll tenure, we're going to be at the retirement. We run the place eventually. So it's both to activate the people who can really make an impact from within in a very strong way. That's number one, who have these decades of connections, right? Well before the challenge, you know, I've had my 10 years of collaborations here at MIT, and this has a lifetime of more than 10 years of collaborations here, right? And many of us and people remember those connections, right? Remember how we teach together, how I lent them something from my lab, and stuff like that, right? We have these personal connections. So it is really the first and uniquely faculty led program that is very helping to come back, see faculty do that. There's a lot of power, and that's also why it's such an academically focused program, because that's what we know how to do. There's many other who can combat antisemitism and can give antisemitism training and title six and all that. And we don't do it, not because it's not important, just because we are not the people who bring in unique expertise in those areas, but when it comes to research collaboration, connections with Israel around those things, we are the ones who can really promote it from within in a way that's unpowered and parallel to anyone else. And that's the, I think the strongest point of Kalaniyot, the faculty leadership. Manya Brachear Pashman: In other words, you're not activists, you're not advocates. That's not what you set out to do. You are researchers, scientists who just want to do research in science. Or Hen: And when I see everybody around us do the best research and science possible, which means engaging with the brightest minds anywhere in the world, and that includes Israel. And we don't want to see that door shut down. There's no hiding it – Ernest and I are Zionists, we're not going to shy away from that. And we think that an academic boycott in the STEM is a risk to Israel. Israel doesn't have oil, right? What Israel has is the Jewish mind, and that mind is the thing that helps Israel, and that mind is the thing that helps the world. And we can go on and on about inventions and discoveries that came out of Israel and Israelis and Jews for the benefit of mankind. So both for the benefit of Israel and all of humanity, we don't want to see the Israeli Academy get isolated. It's going to be bad for all of us. Manya Brachear Pashman: Now I know that there is a program at Indiana University called Olamot, focusing on the humanities. Does this only apply to STEM fields, or do you also have partnerships and collaborations developing across multiple disciplines? Ernest Fraenkel: Yes, absolutely, this is a program that's open to all academic fields, and each university will craft a slightly different program, we're sure. At MIT, because we're STEM dominated, our Kalaniyot program is dominated by STEM, but it's not exclusively STEM here, either. We do have deep involvement with several of our board members in the humanities. Many of the people who come to our programming are in humanities. We're hoping that some of the scholars whom we will select in our first cohort of post doctoral and sabbatical visitors will be in the humanities, but that's going to be much a bigger component of it at other universities such as Dartmouth and Penn, where they have huge humanities programs. Manya Brachear Pashman: And are you getting mostly support, or are you getting any pushback from faculty members? Ernest Fraenkel: So this is really fascinating. Early on, when we first started formulating this program, we wrote a memo explaining, a letter, explaining why we were doing this for something called the faculty newsletter, which is usually a place where people write fairly anti-Israel things, and we kind of braced ourselves for the pushback. And nothing came back. There was no pushback. Because if you believe in academic values in the United States, unless you're a hardcore BDS person, there's really nothing objectionable here. Our goal is to bring brilliant scholars to campus and encourage them to be able to work broadly, without regard to nationality, religion, anything else, any other protective category. And so we were very pleased. And initially, you know, the administration was curious. They were interested. They wanted to review exactly what we're doing. The MIT administration went through everything we're doing, and they gave us the thumbs up, and they've now been helping us make connections and behind the scenes, I believe, I understand that, you know, some provosts and presidents occasionally talk about this when they meet and they, you know, tell each other it's not a bad thing to have at your University. Or Hen: I remember when we kind of got people to know the program, we met with a very high ranking individual at MIT. And that person said, Look, MIT stands on three legs: research, education, and entrepreneurship. Israel excels in all three. Of course, we want those connections. Of course we want those collaborations. And who in the right mind can say that this is anything political, right? Now I'm sure that some people will try at some point. But like Ernest said, we've worked very hard on the language and the messaging to make sure that the language and messaging reflects the way we really see it, as a very strong academic program. Manya Brachear Pashman: So, Dr. Hen, I do want to ask you a personal question. I have read that as a child, you navigated some pretty significant learning disabilities stemming from dysgraphia. You have difficulty translating your thoughts into written form, but the assessment to determine those disabilities also determined that you had a unique gift for abstract comprehension, the ability to conceptually pare down complex ideas to their fundamental core. So I wanted to ask you, in your opinion, what is at the fundamental core of these academic boycotts? Or Hen: Honestly, I do believe that the academic boycotts come from antisemitism. That's the core. I do believe that there are a lot of people who engage in that, not understanding that is what they're doing. I'd like to give people the benefit of the doubt. I think that a lot of people do see a difference between anti-Zionism, anti-Israel, antisemitism, right, which I personally do not share. And that's a different point of view, which is allowed. But I think at the end of the day, trying to isolate Israel, eventually is from a top level, and attempt to bring down the country, because that's the core. Core of Israel is its academics. That's really where it all starts. And if we don't have academia, if we're attacking the Israeli Academy, you're attacking Israel. And any person who takes the time to learn about the Israeli Academy, who listens to speeches by the head of Tel Aviv University about the judicial reform in Israel. Who listens to the head of the Israeli National Academy about how he sees democracy and what he sees about the war, situation, you would learn that the Israeli Academy is really the hallmark of independent academia that stands by itself, as an independent body that really promotes research and good for the world. And anyone who attacks that either doesn't know or doesn't care to know, and I'd like to hope that most people don't know, and once they'll know and appreciate the people, they will see different people. There is a core that doesn't want to know, and okay, we need to make sure that that call remains as small as possible. Manya Brachear Pashman: Dr. Fraenkel, do you agree? Ernest Fraenkel: I'm by nature, a centrist and not a political person, and I also have learned over time that it's very hard to understand other people's motivations. But I do think that one of the paths to it, to solving the problem, is to re-humanize Israel and Israelis in the minds of the people who are currently protesting. And I think we'll have good results if we do that. Manya Brachear Pashman: I'm curious, we've been talking a lot about Israeli research and innovation. Can you kind of share a piece of Israeli innovation that you've heard about recently, that maybe our audience has not and should know about? Ernest Fraenkel: I was just at a conference yesterday, and one of the best talks yesterday, this was at a conference on ALS, was given by a researcher from the Weitzman Institute, Eran Hornstein. And he spoke about an entirely new way to analyze what goes on inside cells in the course of disease. He calls it organellealomics, I think. It's kind of a mouthful, but it was completely innovative. No one has anything similar. It allows you to get a wonderful view of all the different processes that are going on in the cell at a very high level, in a way that is experimentally very accessible. And I think it's really going to transform a lot of how we research diseases, and may lead to some rapid advances in some of these tough cases. Or Hen: Yeah, I can add to that, you know, from the more industry side of things, right? We all have technology in our pockets, in our homes, in our offices, developed in Israel. The most advanced processors by Intel are built on architecture that was developed in Haifa. Apple has engineering centers in Israel. Facebook has engineering centers in Israel, Nvidia. All of us use Israeli technology day in and day out. We either know it or we don't. But there's not a single person in the western world that does not rely on Israeli technology sometime, someplace, some point in his day. Manya Brachear Pashman: And when you were at that conference, Dr. Fraenkel, or Dr. Hen, consider that, when you pull out your phone and consider the many ways in which we use Israeli technology, does that further validate, does it affirm that what you are doing is the right thing to do, and that this will only benefit humanity at large? Ernest Fraenkel: In biology, we often do these experiments where we delete a gene, we make it stop working, and we see what happens to the cell or to the animal that we're studying, right? And just do the thought experiment. What would happen to American science if it didn't have these strong collaborations with Israel? And be weaker in consumer electronics, and be weaker in AI, we would be weaker in all the underpinnings of all the technology that we're all walking around with every day. We'd be weaker in healthcare. Think about the contribution that Israel made to understanding what was going on during the COVID pandemic, right? It's just shocking how much we would lose from this small country not being there. And absolutely, when we think about that, it just drives us even more to try to get this program to spread across all the best universities in the United States, and hopefully we'll make inroads in Europe as well and really bring Israel back to the forefront in everybody's mind as a place where positive things are happening. Manya Brachear Pashman: Well, thank you both for joining us so much and for sharing about this program. Really do appreciate it. It's fascinating and refreshing to learn that academics are supporting academics. Ernest Fraenkel: Thank you very much. Real pleasure to speak with you.
We love hearing finding out the best side hustles our listeners are running, and we cannot believe what one listener does for Hen's Nights. Aftershave After sales, Blue Jolly Ranchers and scouring council pick-ups for re-sale our listeners are grinding that side hustle.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mardi Gras is strongly associated with wild bacchanalia and debauchery, and many took this to heart, and beyond. Fat Tuesday, is a long-standing tradition of the Catholic Church and it marks the last day of before the start of Lent, a time of fasting and repentance. The celebration of Mardi Gras has its roots in the pagan Roman celebration of Lupercalia. This was a February holiday and it honored the Roman god of fertility. It involved feasting, drinking, and carnal behavior. Marlene and Hen [...]
Mike TappMike is one of Labour's hottest rising stars. Elected in July last year, he's already an accomplished media performer. A former soldier, he is at the vanguard of Labour's patriotic centre. But why does he wake up so early in the morning?Wine. Dogs. The military. This podcast has it all. THE POLITICAL PARTY IS BACK ON STAGE!10 March: Alastair Campbell31 March: Anthony Scaramucci12 May: Wes Streeting9 June: Kemi Badenoch14 July: Michael GovePlus more to be announced...Get tickets for all shows here: https://nimaxtheatres.com/shows/the-political-party-with-matt-forde/DONATE to the RNOH Charity here:https://www.rnohcharity.org/donate/donate-onlineSEE Matt at on tour until April 2025, including his extra date at The Bloomsbury Theatre: https://www.mattforde.com/live-shows12 February: Bath, Komedia13 February: Southend, Palace Theatre16 February: Cambridge, The Junction20 February: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts23 February: Brighton, Komedia25 February: Cardiff, Glee Club26 February: Bury St Edmunds, Theatre Royal28 February: Chelmsford Theatre 2 March: Bristol, Hen and Chickens (Matinee)2 March: Bristol, Tobacco Factory4 March: Colchester Arts Centre 6 March: Birmingham, Glee Club7 March: Maidenhead, Norden Farm11 March: Aberdeen, Lemon Tree12 March: Glasgow, Glee Club27 March: Oxford, Glee Club28 March: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts Centre4 April: London, Bloomsbury Theatre Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
There is a creepy TikToker in Australia at the moment who has been filming women without consent (we are not a fan), Lola and Marlie threw a HUGE tantrum at the airport on the way to Africa, and have Hen's Parties gone way too far?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mhari AuroraMhari is a revelation in political broadcasting and in this fascinating chat with Matt she considers some of the big questions facing modern media:What can the 'mainstream media' learn from Joe Rogan?How should they cover Donald Trump?How do you deal with angry taxi drivers?It's all in here!THE POLITICAL PARTY IS BACK ON STAGE!10 March: Alastair Campbell31 March: Anthony Scaramucci12 May: Wes Streeting9 June: Kemi BadenochPlus more to be announced...Get tickets for all shows here: https://nimaxtheatres.com/shows/the-political-party-with-matt-forde/SEE Matt at on tour until April 2025, including his extra date at The Bloomsbury Theatre: https://www.mattforde.com/live-shows20 February: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts23 February: Brighton, Komedia25 February: Cardiff, Glee Club26 February: Bury St Edmunds, Theatre Royal28 February: Chelmsford Theatre 2 March: Bristol, Hen and Chickens (Matinee)2 March: Bristol, Tobacco Factory4 March: Colchester Arts Centre 6 March: Birmingham, Glee Club7 March: Maidenhead, Norden Farm11 March: Aberdeen, Lemon Tree12 March: Glasgow, Glee Club27 March: Oxford, Glee Club28 March: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts Centre4 April: London, Bloomsbury Theatre Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
What a return! The Chancellor is exceptional form as she discusses Trump, tariffs, the threat of Reform and the inside story of when her hair turned ginger. This interview has it all. The realities of life in government plus invaluable advice for creating the perfect Yorkshire Pudding. Oh and a brilliant story about Gordon Brown's tribute to John Prescott... The next guests at The Duchess Theatre are: 10 March: Alastair Campbell31 March: Anthony Scaramucci12 May: Wes Streeting9 June: Kemi Badenoch14 July: Michael Gove Get tickets for all shows here: https://nimaxtheatres.com/shows/the-political-party-with-matt-forde/ SEE Matt at on tour until April 2025, including his extra date at The Bloomsbury Theatre: https://www.mattforde.com/live-shows12 February: Bath, Komedia13 February: Southend, Palace Theatre16 February: Cambridge, The Junction20 February: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts23 February: Brighton, Komedia25 February: Cardiff, Glee Club26 February: Bury St Edmunds, Theatre Royal28 February: Chelmsford Theatre 2 March: Bristol, Hen and Chickens (Matinee)2 March: Bristol, Tobacco Factory4 March: Colchester Arts Centre 6 March: Birmingham, Glee Club7 March: Maidenhead, Norden Farm11 March: Aberdeen, Lemon Tree12 March: Glasgow, Glee Club27 March: Oxford, Glee Club28 March: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts Centre4 April: London, Bloomsbury Theatre Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
It's Week 1, which means the season is officially underway? And, of course, drama follows. The highlight is from Salt Lake City, where Delaware survived a stick check to their face-off guy with 2:00 remaining, which set up the most dramatic ending of the season. To talk about the Blue Hens' debut win, IL's Terry Foy and Nick Ossello are joined by former Delaware captain and assistant coach, who watched the game on a phone with 25 former teammates in the Wells Fargo Center as another fellow Hen, Mike Robinson, took on the Wings with the Halifax Thunderbirds. From there, Foy and Ossello talk about Maryland's OT win at Loyola, Carolina's impressive showing vs. Michigan, Hopkins' week-long marathon capper vs. Georgetown, plus Virginia and Duke wins. Oh, and we have a sponsor! This year, Inside Lacrosse is proud to partner with the NCAA to offer you, our loyal listeners, $5 off all single-day ticket options (men and women) by using the code ILPOD at checkout. So head to NCAA.com/LaxTickets and enter ILPOD at checkout to purchase your tickets. You know you're going to go to Championship Weekend, so why not get $5 off and help us show the NCAA how awesome our listeners are by purchasing your tickets today.
Dr Sharon LockyerThe live comedy industry is worth around £1bn annually to the UK economy, yet it doesn't get included in government conversations about the arts.As a result, it doesn't receive the financial support that other arts forms routinely get.To understand why, and to explain the wider impact of live comedy on society, Matt is joined by Dr Sharon Lockyer from Brunel University. Comedy. It's a serious business. THE POLITICAL PARTY IS BACK ON STAGE!10 February: Rachel Reeves10 March: Alastair Campbell31 March: Anthony Scaramucci12 May: Wes Streeting9 June: Kemi BadenochPlus more to be announced...Get tickets for all shows here: https://nimaxtheatres.com/shows/the-political-party-with-matt-forde/SEE Matt at on tour until April 2025, including his extra date at The Bloomsbury Theatre: https://www.mattforde.com/live-shows12 February: Bath, Komedia13 February: Southend, Palace Theatre16 February: Cambridge, The Junction20 February: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts23 February: Brighton, Komedia25 February: Cardiff, Glee Club26 February: Bury St Edmunds, Theatre Royal28 February: Chelmsford Theatre 2 March: Bristol, Hen and Chickens (Matinee)2 March: Bristol, Tobacco Factory4 March: Colchester Arts Centre 6 March: Birmingham, Glee Club7 March: Maidenhead, Norden Farm11 March: Aberdeen, Lemon Tree12 March: Glasgow, Glee Club27 March: Oxford, Glee Club28 March: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts Centre4 April: London, Bloomsbury Theatre Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Mikaela Testa has revealed she’s set to share the full story behind her experience with the Paul family on her new podcast. Influencer turned entrepreneur, Georgie Stevenson has revealed her dream home is on the market. In an unusual move, the multi-level hilltop mansion is listed for both sale and rent Lucy Jackson and Nikki Westcott have addressed their much publicised feud with OG influencer Lily Brown. The Happy Hour podcast hosts said ever since the trio reunited at Em Davies’ Hen’s they have been inundated with questions about what really went down. US influencer, Kate Cassidy has broken her silence, giving her first interview since her boyfriend Liam Payne’s death. In what appeared to be a paid interview with UL tabloid The Sun, Kate opened up about the One Direction singer’s frame of mind during their final days together and how she found out about his death. Subscribe to Outspoken Plus Outspoken Plus is our subscription offering that provides subscribers with exclusive access to BONUS weekly episodes. Every week, we’ll be dropping content so juicy, we’ve had to put it behind a paywall. A monthly Outspoken Plus subscription costs $5.99 a month, or save with our annual package, for just $49.99 a year*. There are three ways you can become an Outspoken Plus subscriber. Apple users can subscribe via Apple Podcasts here: apple.co/outspoken, while Android users can subscribe via Spotify here: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/outspoken-plus/subscribe or Patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/outspoken_plus. * An annual subscription is only available on Apple Podcasts See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Ask diners. Ask servers. Ask restaurateurs. You can even ask the governor! They'll all tell you it's time to talk about the crisis happening in Denver's restaurants. But everyone defines it a little differently. Some are sick and tired of paying $20 for a mediocre cheeseburger. Others point to recent reports of restaurants closing — more than one in five since 2021 — and no one can agree on what to do. One of city's most successful restaurateurs, Culinary Creative Group founder and CEO Juan Padró, has been lobbying local politicians, and he joins producer Paul Karolyi alongside former president of Bell Policy Center Scott Wasserman to talk through a big idea they think can help. For background, Culinary Creative Group owns more than a dozen bars and restaurants in Denver, including A5, Mister Oso, Bar Dough Fox and the Hen, and the various Tap & Burgers. If all this jargon about Colorado's minimum wage law is still confusing, we recommend this helpful breakdown from the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment and this glossary from our newsletter Hey Denver. What do you think should be done about Denver's restaurant “crisis”? Text or leave us a voicemail with your name and neighborhood, and you might hear it on the show: 720-500-5418 Get your tickets to HEYDAY now! We're putting on an indoor fair with urban flair, like a classic county fair but with a very cool Denver twist. Join us on March 8 for classic carnival games, vintage arcade games, Denver-themed balloon art, and a full day of grandstand entertainment, featuring some of your favorite guests from the podcast. It's family friendly, too, if you wanna bring your kids. Get those tickets now at www.heydaydenver.com. For even more news from around the city, subscribe to our morning newsletter Hey Denver at denver.citycast.fm. Follow us on Instagram: @citycastdenver Chat with other listeners on reddit: r/CityCastDenver Support City Cast Denver by becoming a member: membership.citycast.fm Learn more about the sponsors of this February 5th episode: Arvada Center Looking to advertise on City Cast Denver? Check out our options for podcast and newsletter ads at citycast.fm/advertise Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ava Santina-EvansAva is the star of PoliticsJOE, an online platform which covers politics in a different way to other media. It's hugely successful and in this entertaining and insightful interview, Ava explains the decisions behind that popularity. This takes in everything: from Labour and trade union issues, to the appeal of Trump, and the appeal of Reform to younger voters. All modern politics is here!THE POLITICAL PARTY IS BACK ON STAGE!10 February: Rachel Reeves10 March: Alastair Campbell31 March: Anthony Scaramucci12 May: Wes StreetingPlus more to be announced...Get tickets for all shows here: https://nimaxtheatres.com/shows/the-political-party-with-matt-forde/SEE Matt at on tour until April 2025, including his extra date at The Bloomsbury Theatre: https://www.mattforde.com/live-shows4 February: Leeds, City Varieties5 February: Sheffield, The Leadmill6 February: Chelmsford Theatre7 February: Bedford, The Quarry Theatre12 February: Bath, Komedia13 February: Southend, Palace Theatre16 February: Cambridge, The Junction20 February: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts23 February: Brighton, Komedia25 February: Cardiff, Glee Club26 February: Bury St Edmunds, Theatre Royal28 February: Chelmsford Theatre 2 March: Bristol, Hen and Chickens (Matinee)2 March: Bristol, Tobacco Factory4 March: Colchester Arts Centre 6 March: Birmingham, Glee Club7 March: Maidenhead, Norden Farm11 March: Aberdeen, Lemon Tree12 March: Glasgow, Glee Club27 March: Oxford, Glee Club28 March: Nottingham, Lakeside Arts Centre4 April: London, Bloomsbury Theatre Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Henüz 13 yaşındayken HIV teşhisi konan ve toplumun önyargılarıyla mücadele etmek zorunda kalan Ryan White'ın ilham verici hikayesini anlatıyoruz. Ryan White'ın trajik ama bir o kadar da umut dolu yaşam öyküsünü keşfetmek için bu bölümü kaçırmayın! Patronumuz olun!
Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for January 17, 2025 is: apprehension ap-rih-HEN-shun noun Apprehension most often refers to the fear that something bad or unpleasant is going to happen; it's a feeling of being worried about the future. The word can also refer to seizure by legal process. // There is growing apprehension that next quarter's profits will be lower than expected. See the entry > Examples: “Mark Pope felt uncertain. There was a moment, he admitted, after it was clear that he was Kentucky's choice, when he stood alone at home and grappled with apprehension about a job that offered both spoils he knew well and obstacles, too.” — Myron Medcalf, ESPN, 12 Nov. 2024 Did you know? There's quite a bit to comprehend about apprehension, so let's take a closer look at its history. The Latin ancestor of apprehension (and of comprehend, prehensile, and even prison, among others) is the verb prehendere, meaning “to grasp” or “to seize.” When it was first used in the 14th century, apprehension could refer to the act of learning, a sense that is now obsolete, or the ability or power to understand things—learning and understanding both being ways to “grasp” knowledge or information. It wasn't until the late 16th century that apprehension was used, as it still is today, for the physical seizure of something or someone (as an arrest). The most commonly used sense of apprehension today refers to a feeling that something bad is about to happen, when you seize up, perhaps, with anxiety or dread, having grasped all the unpleasant possibilities.
In this episode of the Ducks Unlimited podcast, host Katie Burke sits down with decoy carver George Strunk in his workshop in Glendora, New Jersey. George shares his journey into the outdoors, revealing his passion for hunting predates his love for crafting decoys. Growing up in a family that embraced the outdoors, George recounts childhood memories spent at a hunting and fishing cabin built by his parents in the early 1950s, near the Dennisville Wildlife Refuge. As the oldest sibling, he and his brother enjoyed exploring the woods and hunting from a young age, starting with rabbit hunting. Join Katie and George as they dive into the world of hunting and the art of decoy carving, celebrating the rich traditions of outdoor life.Listen now: www.ducks.org/DUPodcastSend feedback: DUPodcast@ducks.org