POPULARITY
Modern Satellite Technology: A Chat with Industry Leader Dr Mark DickinsonJoin our Torsten Kriening in our Space Cafe Radio today as we dive into an exciting conversation with Dr Mark Dickinson, the new Chief Technology Officer of NSG - Neo Space Group - with a career spanning top aerospace giants like Airbus, Boeing, and Inmarsat. In this episode, Mark discusses the evolution of satellite technology, the integration of 5G and 6G, and NSG's ambitious vision for the future of space. Learn about software-defined satellites, disaster response, and the role of satellites in enhancing defense and enterprise security. Don't miss this insightful discussion on space sustainability, the challenges of satellite launches, and the exciting developments in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's space sector.This episode is supported by NSG.Useful Links:Space Cafe Radio - with Martijn BlankenSpace Cafe Radio - with Jason AndrewsSpace Café Radio brings you talks, interviews, and reports from the team of SpaceWatchers while out on the road. Each episode has a specific topic, unique content, and a personal touch. Enjoy the show, and let us know your thoughts at radio@spacewatch.globalWe love to hear from you. Send us your thought, comments, suggestions, love lettersYou can find us on: Spotify and Apple Podcast!Please visit us at SpaceWatch.Global, subscribe to our newsletters. Follow us on LinkedIn and X!
Michal Rybka s Martinem Vaněm se tentokrát ponoří do fascinujícího tématu rychlosti světla.Je to jen o fotonech, nebo se tu skrývá něco hlubšího? Jak souvisí maximální rychlost s kauzalitou a strukturou samotného časoprostoru? A co kdyby byla nekonečná – mohl by vesmír vůbec existovat?Podíváme se na limity fyziky a jaké problémy s rychlostí světla řešíme už na oběžné dráze. Prozkoumáme i satelitní komunikaci, včetně systému Inmarsat, který pomohl pátrat po zmizelém letu MH370.Přidejte se k nám a zjistěte, proč je světlo nejen rychlé, ale i překvapivě pomalé!Video z povídání: PBS Space Time - The Speed of Light is NOT About Lighthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msVuCEs8YdoPodívejte se na https://www.retronation.cz na skvělé výlety do herního retra!
In this episode of the Afterburn Podcast, we dive into the mystery surrounding Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. The disappearance of MH370 remains a mystery. In this episode, former fighter pilot and current 777 pilot John 'Rain' Waters interviews aviation expert and author Jeff Wise on the mysterious disappearance of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370. Explore the detailed timeline, cyber vulnerabilities, military responses, and the controversial theories behind this aviation enigma. From the role of Inmarsat data to the shadow of Russian involvement, Wise provides unparalleled insight into one of the greatest mysteries in modern aviation. Discover how cybersecurity, geopolitics, and human factors intersect in this captivating discussion.
Part two of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, Sean, Jorge, and Eric, explore the myriad theories that attempt to unravel the mystery of the vanished aircraft. This episode focuses on dissecting the various hypotheses surrounding the events of March 8, 2014, when MH370 lost contact and disappeared with 239 people on board. The episode opens with a discussion of the hypoxia event theory, a leading explanation that suggests a sudden lack of oxygen incapacitated everyone on board, leaving the aircraft to fly on autopilot until it ran out of fuel and crashed into the Indian Ocean. The Boys explain how a failure in cabin pressurization could lead to such a scenario, emphasizing the aircraft's continued flight on a seemingly controlled path as per the data provided by Inmarsat's satellite pings. From there, the narrative shifts to other possibilities that have captured the imagination and scrutiny of the world. The Boys consider the chilling notion of pilot suicide, discussing the intense scrutiny on Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, whose personal life and professional expertise became focal points of speculation. They discuss the lack of conclusive evidence linking him to a deliberate act, despite the discovery of a simulated flight path on his home flight simulator that intriguingly mirrored MH370's presumed route. Next, they tackle the more unconventional and controversial theories, such as cyber hijacking, where experts speculate that external hackers could have remotely commandeered the aircraft's systems. The theory of a state-sponsored interception is also examined, alongside the outlandish and widely dismissed notion of alien abduction, which, while not supported by evidence, reflects the global fascination and myriad of questions that still surround the flight's disappearance. Resources and Further Reading: Ad Free: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theconspiracypodcast/subscribe Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/theconspiracypodcast Website: www.theconspiracypodcast.com Email: info@theconspiracypodcast.com
In this episode of the Afterburn Podcast, we dive into the mystery surrounding Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. The disappearance of MH370 remains a mystery. In this episode former fighter pilot and current 777 pilot John 'Rain' Waters interviews aviation expert and author Jeff Wise on the mysterious disappearance of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370. Explore the detailed timeline, cyber vulnerabilities, military responses, and the controversial theories behind this aviation enigma. From the role of Inmarsat data to the shadow of Russian involvement, Wise provides unparalleled insight into one of the greatest mysteries in modern aviation. Discover how cybersecurity, geopolitics, and human factors intersect in this captivating discussion.
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. On March 8, 2014, a Boeing 777-200ER scheduled to fly from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing mysteriously vanished from radar with 227 passengers and 12 crew members on board, sparking one of the biggest aviation mysteries in history. The episode begins with a detailed look at the pre-flight circumstances and the profiles of key crew members. Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a veteran pilot with Malaysia Airlines since 1981, boasted over 18,000 flight hours. His impeccable reputation and passion for flying make his involvement in the disappearance a central point of intrigue. Despite speculative media reports about personal issues, no evidence conclusively ties him to any wrongdoing. The co-pilot, First Officer Fariq Abdul Hamid, was in the final stages of his Boeing 777 certification, with Flight 370 being one of his last training flights. Fariq was regarded as professional and dedicated. As the aircraft took off smoothly at 00:42, everything appeared normal with the Boeing 777-200ER climbing to its cruising altitude. The routine status of the flight continued until 1:07 a.m., when the last ACARS transmission was sent, showing nothing out of the ordinary. However, at 1:19 a.m., the tone shifts as the crew performs a standard voice check-in, with the haunting last words, "All right, good night," spoken as the aircraft left Malaysian airspace. Dramatically, at 1:21 a.m., the transponder ceased transmission. The disappearance of the transponder signal marks a critical juncture in the flight's journey, leading to the aircraft vanishing from radar screens. This pivotal moment led to an exhaustive international search and spawned numerous theories ranging from hijacking and pilot suicide to mechanical failure. The narrative then shifts to the extensive search operations that spanned the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean. Despite deploying advanced technology and covering vast areas, no conclusive evidence of the aircraft was found until a flaperon was discovered on Réunion Island in 2015, confirming the aircraft had indeed met a tragic end over the ocean. In their exploration, The Boys discuss the role of Inmarsat satellite data, which played a crucial part in narrowing the search area by analyzing "pings" from the aircraft post-disappearance. This analysis suggested a southern trajectory over the Indian Ocean, away from any traditional flight paths. The episode concludes with a discussion on the aftermath of the disappearance, including the impact on the passengers' families and the aviation industry. The mystery of Flight 370 continues to evoke questions, making it a compelling story of human tragedy intertwined with technological mystery. Resources and Further Reading: Ad Free: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theconspiracypodcast/subscribe Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/theconspiracypodcast Website: www.theconspiracypodcast.com Email: info@theconspiracypodcast.com
The United Kingdom's robust and ambitious space sector has many personalities. In this podcast series, we introduce you to three whom the UK Chapter of SSPI is considering for its prestigious Personality of the Year Award in 2024. One of these three finalists will be named the 2024 Satellite Personality of the Year live at the Better Satellite World Awards Dinner in London on 2 December. Click here to join us there! Each of the three finalists is a star who has made significant contribution to the UK and global satellite industry and whose career is a study of performance and excellence at the highest level. In the second episode, we learn a bit about Antonio Franchi, Head of the 5G/6G NTN Programme Office at the European Space Agency (ESA). Antonio Franchi works at the European Space Agency as the Head of the 5G/6G NTN Programme Office in the Connectivity and Secure Communications Directorate. Antonio has over 30 years of experience in the satellite telecommunications industry. Prior to ESA, Antonio worked for over 20 years with Inmarsat, a major global satellite operator, spearheading a new generation of satellite communications systems. Antonio received an MSc in Electronic Engineering from the University of Rome and an MBA from the London Business School. He is author of 30+ articles and papers published at international conferences and professional magazines, and he holds six international patents in the satcom field.
INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY – DEVELOPING CUTTING EDGE SOLUTIONS FOR GLOBAL SHIPPING Moderator: Mr. Tim Ponath, CEO – NSB Group Panelists: • Mr. Konstantinos Stampedakis, Co-Founder & Managing Director – ERMA FIRST • Mr. Antonis Malaxianakis, Founder & CEO – Harbor Lab • Mr. Ben Palmer, President – Inmarsat • Mr. Yarden Gross, CEO & Co-Founder – Orca AI 9th Capital Link Maritime Leaders Summit - Greece “Dashing Ahead – Leadership in Action” Part of the Posidonia Week. In Partnership with ABS. Monday, June 3, 2024 | Four Seasons Astir Palace Hotel in Athens, Greece For more information, please visit the following link: https://forums.capitallink.com/shipping/2024analyst/
INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY – DEVELOPING CUTTING EDGE SOLUTIONS FOR GLOBAL SHIPPING Moderator: Mr. Tim Ponath, CEO – NSB Group Panelists: • Mr. Konstantinos Stampedakis, Co-Founder & Managing Director – ERMA FIRST • Mr. Antonis Malaxianakis, Founder & CEO – Harbor Lab • Mr. Ben Palmer, President – Inmarsat • Mr. Yarden Gross, CEO & Co-Founder – Orca AI 9th Capital Link Maritime Leaders Summit - Greece “Dashing Ahead – Leadership in Action” Part of the Posidonia Week. In Partnership with ABS. Monday, June 3, 2024 | Four Seasons Astir Palace Hotel in Athens, Greece For more information, please visit the following link: https://forums.capitallink.com/shipping/2024analyst/
Send us a Text Message.TO WATCH ALL FLYOVER CONTENT: www.flyover.liveTO WATCH ALL FULL INTERVIEWS -https://subsplash.com/flyoverconservatives/media/ms/+g6yhgjx Tina Blanco, is a visionary entrepreneur with a passion for launching businesses that aid those in need, often in life-saving capacities. Pioneered the accessibility of satellite phones for the masses, forging lasting partnerships with leading MSS providers like Inmarsat, Iridium, and others over 15 years. Known for her unwavering commitment to improving satellite phone accessibility, Tina Blanco is a true visionary and advocate for positive change and she continues to share her message to always be prepared for the unknown.Tina BlancoWEBSITE: www.beready123.comWEBSITE: www.sat123.comWEBSITE: www.phone123.com -------------------------------------------
Send us a Text Message.TO WATCH ALL FLYOVER CONTENT: www.flyover.liveTO WATCH ALL FULL INTERVIEWS -https://subsplash.com/flyoverconservatives/media/ms/+g6yhgjx Tina Blanco, is a visionary entrepreneur with a passion for launching businesses that aid those in need, often in life-saving capacities. Pioneered the accessibility of satellite phones for the masses, forging lasting partnerships with leading MSS providers like Inmarsat, Iridium, and others over 15 years. Known for her unwavering commitment to improving satellite phone accessibility, Tina Blanco is a true visionary and advocate for positive change and she continues to share her message to always be prepared for the unknown.Tina BlancoWEBSITE: www.beready123.comWEBSITE: www.sat123.comWEBSITE: www.phone123.com -------------------------------------------
The maritime communications space is experiencing massive demand growth for both crew welfare and business applications.In this latest episode of the Seatrade Maritime Podcast we talk to Ben Palmer, President of maritime business for Inmarsat, about the fast-changing landscape for communications in the industry.“One of the things I'd say at the outset is that I was struck when I came into the industry was a slightly binary sense that people wanted to talk about LEO or GEO, as if they were somehow mutually exclusive or there wasn't going to be room for both,” Ben says in a conversation Marcus Hand, Editor of Seatrade Maritime News.“I think the, the reality, and this is sort of playing out over time is demand for capacity is growing massively across the maritime segment as it is actually across the wider economy. We are seeing demand for crew and business applications risen by 70% and 50%, respectively over the last couple of years.”The discussion between Ben and Marcus covers:Inmarsat's merger with Viasat and what this means to the company and its customers.The rise of LEO constellations and combining with Inmarsat's GEO offerings as an orchestrated networkDeveloping a 5G over water serviceManaged services and software provisionThe outlook for maritime communicationsListen to the full conversation now
After they mathematically analyzed the Inmarsat data to figure out where MH370 ran out of fuel in the southern Indian Ocean, the Australian government hired a Dutch maritime survey company called Fugro to search 23,000 square miles. The work started in October, 2014. By that April, 2015 it was clear that the plane was not in fact in the search area, so they doubled the size and asked Fugro to keep going.Ten years after the plane went missing, there's new talk of restarting the search again ... but if so, would they look in the right place?More information at our episode show page here:https://www.deepdivemh370.com/26-restarting-the-searchJoin this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUXIrQ2rO5B_z-AEpjmKaAw/join
This week Rich speaks to Tim Snow, CPO at Inmarsat about enhancing the agility and efficiency of procurement.Emphasising the importance of procurement taking a proactive and involved role from the onset of strategy development, the conversation highlights the necessity for procurement to be seen as a partner capable of driving quality, pace, and commercial thinking, rather than simply executing processes. Key topics include the importance of building meaningful stakeholder relationships, the role of agility in procurement, the balance between speed, compliance, and vendor relationships, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement and innovation within procurement teams. The dialogue further delves into strategic partnerships, the measurement of procurement success beyond cost savings, and the concept of '10x'ing procurement to vastly enhance its contribution to business strategy and outcomes.00:25 Introduction to Procurement's Speed Challenge00:46 Interview with Tim Snow: The Importance of Getting Things Done in Procurement02:26 The Reputation and Agility of Procurement Teams04:42 Strategies for Accelerating Procurement Processes07:31 Balancing Speed, Agility, and Compliance in Procurement15:55 Addressing Common Procurement Bottlenecks21:14 Fostering a Culture of Innovation and Continuous Improvement23:22 Leveraging Strategic Partnerships for Better Outcomes27:00 Evaluating the Success and Impact of Procurement Initiatives32:32 The Concept of 10x'ing Procurement for Future Success35:39 Closing Remarks
In this Better Satellite World podcast, SSPI's Lou Zacharilla speaks with Massimiliano Ladovaz, Chief Operations Officer at Eutelsat Group. Massimiliano leads the UK-based Eutelsat Group team responsible for the completion of the Gen-1 LEO constellation and the design and development of the LEO-GEO Next-Gen constellation. For his achievements, he was chosen as the 2023 SSPI-UK Satellite Personality of the Year and honored at the 2023 Better Satellite World Awards Dinner. Massimiliano joined OneWeb in 2018 at its UK HQ and became the Chief Technology Officer in 2020. With HMG investing in OneWeb after bankruptcy, Massimiliano was instrumental in re-starting the engineering and satellite operations teams in the UK; thus leading the timely production and launch of 650 satellites and the procurement/deployment of 45 gateways and ground network around the globe. Massimiliano started his career at the European Space Agency, then moved to Luxembourg-based SES as VP Spacecraft Platform Engineering and Launch Systems. He then joined Inmarsat in the UK as Senior VP Space Segment & System Architecture at Inmarsat, leading the design, procurement and deployment of several multi-billion US dollars space programs. He holds a Masters in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Rome.
By mid-2015, the search for MH370 had entered a kind of limbo. The designated seabed search area had been scanned without success. So what evidence was there that the plane had really gone south? Attention turned to the topic of floating debris and where it might be found. If the plane had impacted the ocean in the way the Inmarsat data implied — namely, with catastrophic velocity — then there should be many thousands of pieces of wreckage floating on the surface. Oceanographers turned to the science of drift modeling, which can produce probabilistic models of where floating objects in any given stretch of ocean might go. It seemed like the most likely place for stuff to wash ashore was going to be the western shore of Australia, where thousands of beachcombers waited expectantly. They were disappointed. But then a stunning discovery emerged thousands of miles away. For more info and for the video version of this podcast, visit our show page at https://www.deepdivemh370.com/p/episode-16-debris
In this Better Satellite World podcast series, we explore the exciting developments in space-based data analytics and the absolutely game-changing nature of this relatively new part of the industry. The second episode features a conversation with Peter Broadhurst, Senior Vice President, Safety and Regulatory at Inmarsat. Peter joins SSPI's Lou Zacharilla to talk about how Inmarsat is making continuous investments in safety and enhancing life at sea while helping to build maritime communities and collect and process data to improve our knowledge of and relationship with Earth's oceans. Peter Broadhurst joined Inmarsat in 2014 as Vice President of Service Delivery for the Maritime business unit, where he was responsible for leading the development of products and services from conception and implementation, through to launch and life cycle management. Peter was instrumental in the launch of Inmarsat's high-speed broadband service Fleet Xpress launched in March 2016. With over 25 years of experience in the maritime industry, Peter began his career at sea as a Radio Officer, before running his own business and working for a maritime distributor. Peter then spent 15 years with Sea Tel Inc., / Cobham SATCOM as Vice President of Sales and Marketing where he was responsible for overseeing and managing global sales, support, marketing, training, and product management. Peter has a HND Electronics, Marine Radio General Certificate, Radar and Marine Navigation Aids accreditation from Wray Castle Merchant Navy School, and holds an Open University, BSc (Hons) First Class degree on Radio Frequency Systems. Peter is Acting President of Comite International Radio Maritime (CIRM), on the Board of the World Maritime University and an Ambassador for the Sailors' Society.
Careful analysis of satellite signals sent from MH370 to Inmarsat indicated that the plane had flown into a remote area of the southern Indian Ocean. But another possibility existed. The equipment that MH370 carried and the circumstances under which it operated together created a potential vulnerability that sophisticated hijackers could have exploited to make the plane appear to have flown south when it really headed north. If that occurred, then the plane would have flown instead to the northwest, over India, Nepal, China, and Kyrgyzstan before winding up in Kazakhstan. In today's episode we discuss the details of the plane's possible northern route, and explore whether it could have flown all that way without being detected by military radar. More info at deepdivemh370.com. Video version here: https://youtu.be/CxMdcTtLKsQ?si=stECu8s82Ght45Xl
Once the scientists at CSIRO had generated the probability distribution for the plane's last known location on the 7th arc, the next question they had to answer was: how far did the plane travel from that point before it impacted the water? As we've discussed previously, their goal was to define a search box within which the plane was likely to be found. The plane's location along the 7th arc defined the length of the rectangle, and the distance it could have traveled from the 7th arc would define the width of the search box. So the question of how far the plane could have flown after the last transmission depends on what the investigators thought was going on with the plane at that moment. They decided that, based on the nature of the Inmarsat signals, the plane had mostly run out of fuel and had already started its inevitable descent into the ocean. But had it plummeted steeply, or taken a long, gradual glide? More information at deepdivemh370.com.
In this Better Satellite World podcast, we hear a special live report from the World Radiocommunications Conference (WRC-23) in Dubai from Dr. Tony Azzarelli, President of SSPI's UK Chapter and CEO of Azzurra Telecom Ltd. We'll also get a sneak preview of what sorts of fun and excitement are in store at the upcoming Better Satellite World Awards Dinner in London this December! Dr. Tony Azzarelli is CEO of Azzurra Telecom Ltd., which he founded in August 2018 to provide expertise and consulting on Regulatory and Government Affairs for the telecom industry. He is also one of the founders of SSPI's UK Chapter and its new President. Tony is the Founder and Company Director of ACCESS.SPACE Alliance, an organization dedicated to the small satelite industry, and is a Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology (FIET) and the Royal Society of Arts. Before founding Azzurra Telecom, he served in a variety of management roles at OneWeb, including VP of Market Access, VP of Global Spectrum Licensing and VP of Regulatory and Government Affairs. Tony previously served as Head of Space and Sciences Services Group for Ofcom, Deputy Director of International Market Access and Regulatory Affairs at Boeing and Director of Spectrum Affairs at ICO Global Communications. He began his career at the European Space Agency as a System Telecom Engineer and went on to become a Senior Engineer in Spectrum Management for INMARSAT. Tony holds a Doctorate in Electronic Engineering from Politecnico di Torino and an MBA from the Open University.
This week, Jeff Wise and Andy Tarnoff break down the latest in a string of stunning developments into the disappearance of Malaysia Airline flight MH370. It's the week after the revelation that Inmarsat had been collecting data from the missing plane for a full six hours after it vanished from military radar. Now it turns out that, with a bit of clever math, Inmarsat scientists have been able to narrow down the plane's location to seven broad arcs — and more than that, these arcs imply that the plane took one of two routes towards its final destination. One route goes north, the other goes south — but which is correct?For more information about the episode, and a link to the video version of this podcast, visit our show page at deepdivemh370.com
The First Law of MH370 is that the closer you look at it, the weirder it gets. A good example of this principle can be found in episode six, in which we explore how exactly the satellite communications system, or satcom, came to be turned off and back on again after the plane disappeared from radar. At first, most observers assumed that an inattentive hijacker must simply have left the system on when turning off all the other form of communication. But careful analysis of the data revealed that that was not the case, and raised the crucial question: what procedure could have been used to turn the system turned off and off again, how much expertise would be required to do it that way, and what does this tell us about the perpetrators? Also, Jeff reveals evidence of a little-noticed turn hidden in the Inmarsat data.For more information about the episode, and a link to the video-only podcast, visit our show page at deepdivemh370.com or our YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/@DeepDiveMH370.
On March 24, 2014, the Malaysian Prime minister made a shocking announcement: using a new kind of mathematical analysis, scientists at the British satellite communications company Inmarsat had determined conclusively that MH370 had flown into a remote area of the southern Indian Ocean. Because there are no islands in the area, there was no possibility that anyone on the plane could have survived. Therefore, all 239 passengers and crew must be dead. It was a stunningly sweeping conclusion to reach based entirely on a kind of mathematics that no one in the outside world knew the details of. But was it correct? Herein lies the technical heart of the MH370 mystery, one that no TV documentary (and only one book) has ever delved into, involving as it does such arcana as geosynchoronous orbital drift and Doppler precompensation. But Jeff and Andy break it down for you in plain, easy-to-understand English. For show notes and links to the video-only version of this podcast, visit deepdivemh370.com.
Within weeks after the disappearance of MH370, one theory of its disappearance had come to the fore: that one of the pilots had seized control of the plane and flown it on a prolonged and sophisticated murder-suicide mission into the southern Indian Ocean. Nothing like it had ever happened before, but there seemed no other way to easily explain the picture that had emerged from the Inmarsat data. So who were these men? In today's episode we'll look at what friends and family said about Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah and First Officer Fariq Abdul Hamid and what traces could be found of them on social media. Based on what we've found, do you think one of them is a cold-blooded mass murderer? Let us know in the comments. And as always, for more information (or to sign up for our free weekly newsletter) check out the full show notes at deepdivemh370.com. For a video version of this podcast, check out https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAonCb_2GvOsYtVgh7gBGt7QYeFiBCEkL
In what's sure to be the most controversial episode of the series so far, Jeff and Andy delve into the question of whether MH370 might have had a previously unrecognized security backdoor. In the months after the disappearance, a series of surprising facts emerged which, taken together, raised the possibility that the Inmarsat data guiding the official search might not be as infalliably trustworthy as previously assumed. One Independent Group member even identified a specific parameter in the plane's Satellite Data Unit which, if switched, would make the plane look like it was going south when it was really going north. Whether or not this vulnerability was exploited, its existence means that there was now a second lens through which the evidence of the case could be viewed.Do you think that this back door is a flat-out impossibility that should be discarded alongside theories of UFOs and black holes? Or a plausible hypothesis that needs to be explored further? Let us know in the comments.And as always, for more information (or to sign up for our free weekly newsletter) check out the full show notes and link to video podcast at deepdivemh370.com.
Shipping Podcast - listen to the maritime professionals in the world of shipping
Remote health care How can digital health solutions contribute to good health and wellness at sea? In this episode, I discuss that with the Managing Director of OneHealth by VIKAND, Ronald Spithout. Ronald held several positions in the maritime industry. Before retiring last year, he was the President of Inmarsat's maritime satellite systems, so connectivity is close to his heart. Combining Ronald's passion for connectivity and the well-being of seafarers has led him to take on a new role as MD of OneHealth. This episode covers many aspects of connectivity and digital health systems. Thank you for listening. #everyconversationmatters
As the cost to launch a rocket into orbit has come down over the past decade, a slew of startups have joined the emerging space economy. But is there enough business for all these companies? And what's the broad economic case for space? In this episode of Faster, Please! — The Podcast, I'm chatting about those questions and more with Michael Sheetz.Michael is a space reporter for CNBC where he also writes the "Investing in Space" newsletter.In This Episode* The business case for space (1:05)* SpaceX, Blue Origin, and the other players in space (4:03)* How much demand is there for space services? (10:15)* To the Moon and Mars (13:59)Below is an edited transcript of our conversationThe business case for spaceJames Pethokoukis: How do private companies intend on making money in space over the next decade?Michael Sheetz: The first and foremost way is the tried-and-true way when it comes to making money in space, which is providing communications data and other services back to people here on Earth. You're talking about communication systems like Starlink, which are the next generation of communication services that have been around, from the geo-communication satellites of decades prior. That's the primary, immediate way that people are making money right now in space. The second way that people are making money in space is by launching satellites for other customers: You're talking about the rocket business, the transportation business. You see stuff like OTVs, or orbital transfer vehicles. That's a way to deliver stuff into space.Then there's a third kind of newer way, which is just microgravity research in general. That's coming to the fore really in the last decade as NASA has really opened up the International Space Station as a testbed for commercial technologies and not just NASA's own technologies. And a lot of companies see that as really just a first foray into that ground. Some of them are trying to do it in their own way by sending capsules into orbit and bringing them back, not going to a space station. The other way is by sending it to a space station, and there are actually four or five major projects underway in the United States to build private space stations in orbit. Those are companies that are either working together or building their own solo units, and they're all just kind of vying for a future in which you don't just have one giant space station, because the International Space Station is huge, but instead of the ISS, you have lots of these little space stations that people can sign agreements with. Say a pharmaceutical company wants to test out a new drug in orbit, they'll sign a research agreement with a company that's going to fly them up there, test it out, fly it back down. They might have astronauts on board. They might not.The other way — this is the other kind of nascent sector — is the lunar infrastructure world, and that's all very much a new space race, if you will, because there's a geopolitical element there. We've got India, we have China both firmly in that mix. China has been arguably one of the most successful at landing on the Moon in the last decade. And NASA, instead of trying to fly themselves to the Moon for these cargo missions and research, they've actually gone to companies and said, “Hey, bid on these contracts, deliver services to us. We'll put our payloads onto your spacecraft, your lander, your rover, and then get it down to the Moon and either get us back data or even return materials.” But mostly just, “Let's try to figure out if we can actually make use of the water that's believed to be on the surface of the Moon.” And that's a really big key point: The first round in terms of trying to make use of the Moon is all about, can we harvest the resources that are on the lunar surface?SpaceX, Blue Origin, and the other players in spaceMuch of the conversation among regular people, to the extent they're aware of really what's going on, what you've just described so wonderfully, is SpaceX. Maybe they've heard of Jeff Bezos and Blue Origin. How far behind is Blue Origin of SpaceX? Do we have a feel for where that company is?I, at this point, wouldn't even put it as really a competition, because SpaceX is very much in a league of their own. Blue Origin has so dramatically taken a different approach to development, very much more akin to the aerospace and defense contractors of the past. It's fascinating because both companies are actually very similar sizes in terms of personnel, but SpaceX has taken this approach of, let's just get one win after the other and try to just break things a little bit at a time and keep pushing further that way. Whereas Blue Origin is taking the route of, we want everything to work the first go, the first launch, the first landing on the Moon, all these other nuances in there. And so far, SpaceX's strategy has been dominant. Now, the United States is not looking at United Launch Alliance, one of the existing providers for rocket launches, as its primary source of both getting astronauts and satellites in orbit, they're looking to SpaceX. There's a flipping of the head that's happened in the last decade.In this next decade, and even just in the next three to five years, it's a really critical point in Blue Origin's history where the company has been around longer than SpaceX, albeit they took a very different approach at the beginning and have taken a very different approach in recent years as well. But they need to show not just for the customers that they signed contracts for—such as United Launch Alliance, delivering engines for them, or different contractors like NASA, providing services to the Moon—they need to show that they can start delivering on those contracts and start actually competing. Maybe not head to head right away, but at least start to get some actual performance and execution as opposed to basically at this point saying, “Here's our grand architecture of everything that we want happen over the next 100 years,” which would be amazing. I can totally see where Jeff's vision for people in research laboratories and living in Lagrange points and all these kinds of things could happen. But you have to make some first inroads, and they haven't yet done that. It's a one-horse race right now.Since we've been talking about those two companies: Are the goals the same but the strategies and timelines different or are they fundamentally trying to achieve different things?They very much have distinct missions when you just look at how they think about where they're going, the trajectory of the company, the trajectory of the space industry writ large. They do have very similar fundamental steps that they have to achieve to get towards those missions. When you look at one of their main products at Blue Origin, for example, with their New Glenn rocket, you still have to do the same basics of, fly a satellite to orbit, land it a couple times successfully, start reusing it and show that you can reuse it efficiently. Those are all things that Falcon 9 did and now SpaceX is going to have to do with Starship as well. They both have similar incremental steps, even if their broader mission targets aren't the same.I think one really interesting thing about where the space industry is at today is that it actually really isn't about just SpaceX versus Blue Origin, but it's also Rocket Lab. It's also Maxar. It's also Planet. There are all these different pieces of the broader architecture that are in the space economy and they're all kind of vying for different revenue streams within the space economy. But when we talk about SpaceX and Blue Origin, and I think we might be kind of oversimplifying the industry just into launch and basic transportation as opposed to what it really is in a lot of ways, which is infrastructure. And that's the kind of holistic approach, when you think about the companies that are players in that, where you start actually seeing Rocket Lab just did their 40th electron launch. Yeah, it's a small launch. No, it's not the same service as Falcon 9. But they've carved out a really important niche in that, and they're trying to use that to not just build a larger rocket, Neutron, but also build out a very strong space systems division and then provide services.Sort of like how SpaceX did with Starlink where they were like, “Look, we've got the rocket business down. Let's go find revenue sources.” The first one right off the bat was, “Let's get better internet service, broadband into hard-to-reach areas at low cost comparatively to years past, and we'll do it in a way that just really provides this holistic coverage: You can go anywhere in the world, plug it in, it will connect to one of our satellites.” As opposed to just the regional focus of past communication systems. I think one really important key aspect of where the industry is at today is the fact that there are all these different companies that may not have billionaire backers, but they have big investors behind them, they have big revenue coming in: Planet and Rocket Lab, we're talking about pulling over $100 million in revenue a year. That's not inconsequential. Maxar and the like and others are really trying to further establish themselves. I think of Iridium with their communication systems.There are all these different players that have their pieces of the overall industry. Some of them compete head-to-head, some of them don't. And I think that's where you start to see an industry that isn't at a little bit of, for lack of a better way of saying it, a single-fault failure situation, where if Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos loses interest in space or something worse happens to them, all of a sudden the US progress in space evaporates. That's not the case today, and I think that's the most actually exciting thing about where the broader space economy is at.How much demand is there for space services?Is there enough business for all these companies? Are there enough people who want to put things in space and do things in space to justify this archipelago of companies that you've just described, or do people talk about [how] there's going to need to be a shakeout? Or is it just that there's so much potential demand, boy, it is going to be hard to fulfill it all?I'll give an example to answer your first question, but I want to hit the second aspect of what you talked about first. There is going to be a shakeout right now, and I think there is a shakeout underway. We've seen a lot of M&A [merger and acquisition] activity this year. We've seen a couple bankruptcies. We've seen a couple of people get acquired for likely very little money, and that's because the free money of the past has gone away, especially in a high capital-intensive industry with high risk. Even as we're seeing now, Viasat, one of the most established players, had their crown jewel new satellite malfunction shortly after getting into orbit. Then the company they recently acquired, a UK company, Inmarsat, one of their recently launched satellites malfunctioned in orbit. So now Viasat has got two malfunctioning satellites that they're trying to deal with. This is a really high-risk business that we're talking about, and that opens up new potential for M&A, and it also opens up new opportunities as valuations have come down where companies that might not have been either competing with each other but could see each other as compatible are now starting to join forces effectively. And other companies that had a stronger position coming into this shakeout period are starting to take advantage of that, as well as investors who are behind those companies.This first thing that you talked about, and I'll give the example, I think the data communications world is the perfect example of, is there enough money and is there enough demand to go around for everybody? When you look at just purely broadband services, which actually there's quite a bit of variety within how you provide those services, which kind of customers you target, that realm has seen no shortage of demand. Every single company you talk to, whether it's a company that provides regional-focused broadband service to enterprises in one location or another company that goes after transatlantic flights and providing in-flight Wi-Fi, every single executive I talk to across that data communications business says, “We need more satellites and orbits so that we can provide more supply because there's more demand than we can provide.”And we're talking about what's already one of the most crowded parts of the space industry, from an established perspective, with multiple players around the world providing services all over the place. The fact that all of those guys are looking at this hockey stick from a demand perspective and all the different layers that they can provide service to — whether it's households, governments, businesses, shipping companies, whatever — that's where there's a lot of excitement around, this established market is even growing at a high rate, what about all these other little nascent markets? I'm not talking space tourism. That might be a fun place to watch that people always get excited about. It's one of the lowest revenue sources in the industry. I'm talking about the lunar infrastructure that I mentioned before. Remote sensing is one of the wildest frontiers in the last decade, and when you look at the varieties of companies that are competing and the customer capture that they're getting and the new applications that are coming out of that, it's absolutely wild. And so I think those new growing verticals are just showing that, yes, there's still demand, it's still growing.To the Moon and MarsAssuming that the US, NASA, we're going to go to the Moon, we're going to stay on the Moon, we're going to build stuff on the Moon, over the next 15 years will most of those rockets be NASA rockets taking people and stuff to the Moon, or SpaceX rockets?I don't even think it's just going to be SpaceX rockets. I think Starship definitely, if they continue to make progress… But mind you, it's been a little bit of a bumpy road in recent years. We have some reliability issues with the Raptor engines we've got to still work out. Albeit the first flight was called a success, I think rightfully so, but it's an incremental one and they still have a lot of steps to go. And when you go back to years past, just even flying humans on Starship, SpaceX has been very candid about saying, “Look, we want to do hundreds of these flights before we put people on this thing.” So maybe it's not Starship, at least in this decade, that's flying tons of people to the Moon. But you've got a workhorse in Falcon 9 that can deliver lunar payloads. It is going to deliver lunar payloads even in the next year.You've got a number of other rockets that are coming online to deliver services. NASA's own rocket, SLS, really isn't going to fly more than once a year at best. And that's pretty optimistic. I see that as lifting the biggest stuff that we need to try to get there, such as getting Orion and Lunar Gateway and all these other things. But really the core of it is, when we're talking about building infrastructure on the Moon in a way that you have a sustained presence, that's a group effort. This is not a single company, single agency doing that. That's something where you need the services of the likes of Firefly building their lunar lander, Astrobotic out of Pittsburgh building their lander. You need Rocket Lab to get Neutron flying. You want Relativity to have Terran R flying. You want this robust ecosystem of transportation devices sort of like we do of any other method of transportation here in the United States and globally, where it's not just one company that builds all the ships. Even in airlines, Boeing and Airbus dominate; however, they're two of a broader ecosystem of several other companies that have carved out niches for them making regional aircraft and stuff like that. And that's what's going to be needed to build that broader lunar infrastructure.I love the notion of going to Mars and colonizing Mars. What is your sense of other people in the space industry who don't work for SpaceX, what do they make of that goal that Elon Musk talks about? Do they view it as just Elon being Elon, these kind of huge aspirational goals? Or do they think this is something we can do as a space industry over the next quarter century?One of the most fascinating things, I think, is that you would get a huge variety of answers from people in the space industry on whether or not (1) they fundamentally agree with that premise that we should be doing it, what it should look like, etc., and (2) how we're going to make it happen if they're even in favor of doing so. And I think that's an amazing reflection of the different interests and the variety of folks who are in this industry, the inspiration that they take from the different missions of either their companies or agencies or projects that they're working on. I think at its core, it's something that still feels too far out to really put a pin in it because there's not a right way to do it currently and not an effective way to do it currently. And so it's something that, sort of like with the Moon and the Artemis Accords providing this new framework of cooperation and how we use resources and space, going to Mars, it's only really going to become a question of how should we be doing this once we're actually getting closer to doing it.I think a commercial company getting a lander on Mars is going to be a first start in that new era. But even that I don't see happening for another five to six years at least, and that's just maybe a small spacecraft. So that's a question I think is extremely open ended. But I do see us on this trajectory where it's not just the Moon, it's not just Mars, it's other planetary bodies, it's asteroids, it's all these other things of exploration where once we start getting into the realm — and you can look at any of the explorers of the past to kind of find your guide for how this happened, there were people who made that first foray into a new land and a new realm, and then after that we're like, “Okay, so we can do this. Cool. Now let's try to figure out what this should really look like and what establishing a settlement on another planet would really look like.”My short answer is, we're so far away from it in a realistic sense that I think what I would point people to now, with the fear of them losing interest in what space can really provide to the rest of humanity and the benefits it provides, that they should be looking at the current infrastructure that we have here on Earth and how it benefits us and makes our everyday lives better, one, and two, the real near-term possibilities of what the United States putting a presence on the Moon, China putting a presence on the Moon, India putting a presence on the Moon, what that looks like geopolitically, what that looks like from a resources standpoint, how we can compete in a way that's not leading to some sort of new conflict in space. That just seems like a place where things could escalate really quickly and poorly. As opposed to what's really happening right now is, in the next couple of years we're going to see more and more spacecraft landing on the Moon, and I think that's an exciting near-term future. What we do on Mars, what we do on asteroids, what we do elsewhere, it's going to be something down the road. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe
Minister Micky Adriaansens is er wel klaar mee en grijpt in om nieuwe vertraging van uitrol van 5G te voorkomen. Want door een langslepende ruzie met satellietbedrijf Inmarsat dreigt opnieuw vertraging en om dat te voorkomen, grijpt de minister van Economische Zaken, Micky Adriaansens nu in. Ze is er wel klaar mee en pakt de frequentie van het bedrijf af. Volgens Adriaansens is dit nodig omdat er een patstelling is ontstaan in het conflict met Inmarsat. Dat bedrijf gebruikt al decennialang de 3,5 GHz-frequentieband voor noodoproepen van zeeschepen, die worden opgevangen in het Friese Burum. Die band is echter aangewezen voor 5G. Maar Inmarsat wilde Burum niet zomaar opgeven en kreeg eerder gelijk van de rechter in een kort geding. Een onafhankelijke commissie adviseerde daarop de verhuizing van het satellietstation naar Griekenland en een passende vergoeding. Daarmee leek een oplossing gevonden. Leek, want Inmarsat vindt de loopduur van de vergunning van de Griekse telecomautoriteiten te kort. Die loopt tot eind 2027, maar het bedrijf wil er een die loopt tot en met 2032. Volgens Adriaansens biedt de Griekse vergunning "voldoende zekerheid" dat Inmarsat ook na 2027 verder mag gaan en vindt de eisen van Inmarsat onredelijk en grijpt daarom in. Ze kondigt in een brief aan de Kamer aan dat de 3,5 GHz-band vanaf 1 februari volgend jaar niet meer mag worden gebruikt voor noodoproepen van zeeschepen. Ze verandert daarvoor het Nationaal Frequentieplan en hoopt hiermee de kwestie Inmarsat te kunnen afronden. Verder in deze Tech Update: Een van de grootste Amerikaanse persbureaus, Associated Press (in de journalistieke volksmond beter bekend als AP) heeft richtlijnen gegeven aan zijn journalisten over het gebruik van generatieve AI. In een blogpost benadrukt AP dat het bedrijf AI niet ziet 'als een vervanging van journalisten op welke manier dan ook', maar 'dat ze deze richtlijnen ontwikkelt voor verslaggevers en redacteuren over hoe AI te gebruiken. Open AI heeft het volledige team van Global illumination, een klein Amerikaans bedrijf overgenomen om 'te werken aan de kernproducten' van Open AI, waaronder ChatGPT. Een van de paradepaardjes van Global illumination is het spel Biomes, dat opvallend veel gelijkenissen vertoont met het immens populaire Minecraft. En daarmee is de cirkel rond, want Minecraft is van Microsoft en dat is weer de partner en investeerder van Open AI. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
SpaceTime with Stuart Gary | Astronomy, Space & Science News
SpaceTime S26E66 - The James Webb Telescope has discovered an ancient galaxy, called GS-9209, which suddenly and mysteriously died – halting all star formation. Inmarsat has denied suggestions that two recent outages of its I-4 F1 satellite was due to a denial of service cyber-attack by an unfriendly foreign power.- Queenslanders are on the hunt searching for meteorite fragments from a meteor which lit up the night skies of northern Queensland last week.- Procyon – the brightest star in Canis Minor, the bloated aging red giant Arcturus, the red super giant Antares, and the June solstice are among the highlights of the night skies on June Skywatch.Listen to SpaceTime on your favorite podcast app with our universal listen link: https://spacetimewithstuartgary.com/listen and access show links via https://linktr.ee/biteszHQ For more SpaceTime and show links: https://linktr.ee/biteszHQ For more podcasts visit our HQ at https://bitesz.com SpaceTime Series 26 Episode 66 by Stuart Gary: - The James Webb Telescope has discovered an ancient galaxy, called GS-9209, which suddenly and mysteriously died – halting all star formation. - Inmarsat has denied suggestions that two recent outages of its I-4 F1 satellite was due to a denial of service cyber-attack by an unfriendly foreign power. - Queenslanders are on the hunt searching for meteorite fragments from a meteor which lit up the night skies of northern Queensland last week. - Procyon – the brightest star in Canis Minor, the bloated aging red giant Arcturus, the red super giant Antares, and the June solstice are among the highlights of the night skies on June Skywatch.#space #astronomy #science #news #podcast #spacetime
Viasat completes acquisition of Inmarsat. The US State Department has released a 25-page document outlining a path to improving diplomatic efforts in space. US Space Command announces that they have assumed all missile defense responsibilities from US Strategic Command per the 2022 Unified Command Plan signed by President Joe Biden. North Korea's rocket suffers a second stage malfunction. SpaceX marks 200th successful launch, and more. Remember to leave us a 5-star rating and review in your favorite podcast app. Miss an episode? Sign-up for our weekly intelligence roundup, Signals and Space, and you'll never miss a beat. And be sure to follow T-Minus on Twitter and LinkedIn. T-Minus Guest Laura Crabtree, CEO of Epsilon 3, on digital transformation for the ground segment, aerospace manufacturers, and managing risk as an aerospace company. You can follow Laura on LinkedIn and Twitter and learn more about Epsilon3 on their website. Selected Reading Viasat Completes Acquisition of Inmarsat- Cision PR Newswire State Department wants to expand diplomacy in space- The Hill Lockheed Martin To Collaborate With U.S. Army To Improve Space-Enabled Defense Systems- Lockheed Martin Northrop Grumman's deep-space radar passes critical design review- SpaceNews SpaceX mission returns from space station with ex-NASA astronaut, 3 paying customers- NPR The Falcon 9 may double the record for consecutive launch success tonight- Ars Technica Sierra Space's Dream Chaser® Spaceplane Comes to Life- Sierra Space North Korea fails to launch satellite: state media- Nikkei Asia PLD Space set to launch Spain's first private rocket into space- NASASpaceFlight.com Colorado State Government Grants ThinkOrbital $250,000 to Revolutionize In-Space Welding Technology- Think Orbital Wanted: European commercial cargo service for space stations around Earth- ESA Melissa Quinn Explains Her Spaceport Cornwall Departure, Next Steps for Spaceport- Via Satellite Audience Survey We want to hear from you! Please complete our 4 question survey. It'll help us get better and deliver you the most mission-critical space intel every day. Want to hear your company in the show? You too can reach the most influential leaders and operators in the industry. Here's our media kit. Contact us at space@n2k.com to request more info. Want to join us for an interview? Please send your pitch to space-editor@n2k.com and include your name, affiliation, and topic proposal. T-Minus is a production of N2K Networks, your source for strategic workforce intelligence. © 2023 N2K Networks, Inc. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In our episode today, I am joined by Neale Faulkner, Regional Vice President at Inmarsat Aviation based in the Middle East. Neale and I will deep dive into the Inmarsat Passenger Experience Survey 2022 and discuss the results and findings.In the age of constant connectivity, staying connected even at 30,000 feet has become a top priority for modern-day travelers. Whether it's business professionals needing to stay in touch with their work, or leisure travelers wanting to share their experiences on social media or stream their favorite movies, inflight Wi-Fi has become a game-changer.In the recently released Inmarsat Passenger Experience Survey 2022, they surveyed 11,000 passengers across the globe to understand passengers' expectations and how these have evolved over the past five years. Their findings indicate that passenger desires and beliefs have changed. Some of the topics we'll explore include the drivers of passenger behavior and how this informs the IFE & C strategy for airlines and suppliers, the desire for more transparency from passengers regarding the speed and reliability of the Wi-Fi connection, the tradeoffs for free Wi-Fi and the new battleground between suppliers, Quality Of Experience (QOE) which measures and reports on the connectivity experience at the passenger device level. This is an area that is seeing increased activity, with alliances and various solutions now coming to the market.In conclusion, Neale will provide us with some insider tips on what to see and do in Dubai and the UAE from a local's perspective with some of his recommendations not being typically found on a tourist map. Additionally, I asked him about a recent passenger experience that wowed and he will share with us his recent experience flying with Wizz Air, a Hungarian ultra-low-cost carrier that exceeded his expectations. Let's go!Transcript will be available in 12 hours. www.onyourflighttoday.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/onyourflighttodayhttps://www.youtube.com/@onyourflighttodayhttps://twitter.com/YourFlightToday
SpaceX adds itself as co-defendant in an environmental lawsuit against the FAA. Rocket Lab, Stratolaunch, and Vast Space have all been named in court filings that divide Virgin Orbits assets. Arctic Space and One Web receive approval for Satellite Network Portal ground station in Sweden. Viasat and Inmarsat inch closer to merger, and more. Remember to leave us a 5-star rating and review in your favorite podcast app. Miss an episode? Sign-up for our weekly intelligence roundup, Signals and Space, and you'll never miss a beat. And be sure to follow T-Minus on Twitter and LinkedIn. T-Minus Guest Steven Tomaszewski, Senior Director at Aerospace Industries Association, on national security space considerations and policy. You can connect with Steve on LinkedIn or Twitter and find out more about the Aerospace Industries Association on their website. Selected Reading SpaceX set to join FAA to fight environmental lawsuit that could delay Starship work- CNBC Virgin Orbit sells assets in bankruptcy auction to Rocket Lab, Stratolaunch and Vast's Launcher- CNBC Arctic Space Technologies to support OneWeb's constellation with construction of hyperscale satellite ground station installation- One Web Iridium and OneWeb Confirm Success Post SpaceX Launch- Via Satellite Inmarsat Adds Free Wave Technologies as IoT Partner- Via Satellite L3HARRIS RECEIVES CONTRACT TO ADVANCE TECHNOLOGY FOR INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY- L3Harris AFRL taps Ursa Major for hypersonic, space launch engines- Breaking Defense The Spaceport Company demonstrates offshore launch operations- SpaceNews Space Mining Market Technology Thriving to Touch USD 1.99 Billion by 2027, With a CAGR of 14.41% - New study Research Report by Market Research Future (MRFR)- Global Newswire Sending astronauts to Mars by 2040 is 'an audacious goal' but NASA is trying anyway- Space.com How NASA Plans to Melt the Moon—and Build on Mars- Wired Audience Survey We want to hear from you! Please complete our 4 question survey. It'll help us get better and deliver you the most mission-critical space intel every day. Want to hear your company in the show? You too can reach the most influential leaders and operators in the industry. Here's our media kit. Contact us at space@n2k.com to request more info. Want to join us for an interview? Please send your pitch to space-editor@n2k.com and include your name, affiliation, and topic proposal. T-Minus is a production of N2K Networks, your source for strategic workforce intelligence. © 2023 N2K Networks, Inc. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Quad leaders summit gives space a shoutout. FCC approves a possible Viasat-Inmarsat deal. Special coverage from the GEOINT summit happening this week (and there's already lots of it). Space Force goes meta. And Melissa Quinn gives us the insider perspective on Spaceport Cornwall and UK launch services. Remember to leave us a 5-star rating and review in your favorite podcast app. Miss an episode? Sign-up for our weekly intelligence roundup, Signals and Space, and you'll never miss a beat. And be sure to follow T-Minus on Twitter and LinkedIn. T-Minus Guest Our featured interview today is with Melissa Quinn, Head of Spaceport Cornwall, on what's next for domestic launch services, providers, and users in the UK. You can follow Melissa on LinkedIn and Twitter. Selected Reading Quad Leaders' Summit Fact Sheet - The White House Australia-United States Joint Leaders' Statement - An Alliance for our Times - The White House Viasat's proposed acquisition of Inmarsat receives U.S. Federal Communications Commission approval - Press Release Umbra and Ursa to collaborate on radar imaging data products - SpaceNews Planet seeks partners that can extract more value from data - SpaceNews Planet-led RapidAI4EO Consortium Releases One of the Largest Earth Observation Training Datasets for Machine Learning Applications - Press Release Impact Observatory Launches IO Monitor to Understand Climate, Financial, and Environmental Risk in Near Real-Time - Press Release AT&T tries to block Starlink/T-Mobile plan for satellite-to-phone service - Ars Technica Stoke Space has received repeated investments from the venture arm for the U.S. intelligence community - TechCrunch Space Force turns to metaverse to predict effects of spaceport congestion - SpaceNews Head of Spaceport Cornwall, Melissa Quinn, Announces Departure from Cornwall Council - Press Release Start-Ups Bring Silicon Valley Ethos to a Lumbering Military-Industrial Complex - NY Times Size of the Prize: Assessing the Market for Edge Computing in Space - Via Satellite Audience Survey We want to hear from you! Please complete our 4 question survey. It'll help us get better and deliver you the most mission-critical space intel every day. Want to hear your company in the show? You too can reach the most influential leaders and operators in the industry. Here's our media kit. Contact us at space@n2k.com to request more info. Want to join us for an interview? Please send your pitch to space-editor@n2k.com and include your name, affiliation, and topic proposal. T-Minus is a production of N2K Networks, your source for strategic workforce intelligence. © 2023 N2K Networks, Inc. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Conversaciones protegidas en WhatsApp / Fábrica de BYD en Galicia / Píldora oral anti-radiación / Robogrúa para resucitar Spitzer / Un millón de criptomonederos con 1 BTC / UE aprueba Microsoft-Activision Patrocinador: Hogar 5G de Vodafone te proporciona conexión a internet de alta velocidad en todos tus hogares, con la máxima movilidad. ¿Te vas de vacaciones? ¿Estarás en tu segunda residencia? Te llevas el router y listo. Funciona en segundos y sin necesidad de un instalador. — No esperes más, descubre toda la información en vodafone.es/hogar-5g. Conversaciones protegidas en WhatsApp / Fábrica de BYD en Galicia / Píldora oral anti-radiación / Robogrúa para resucitar Spitzer / Un millón de criptomonederos con 1 BTC / UE aprueba Microsoft-Activision
The U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has officially greenlighted the proposed $7.3 billion merger between Viasat and Inmarsat.
Viasat's proposed acquisition of Inmarsat gets the green light. Swiss start-up ClearSpace has contracted with Arianespace to launch its first debris de-orbit mission. NASA has released a draft request for proposals for a vehicle to deorbit the International Space Station, and more. Remember to leave us a 5-star rating and review in your favorite podcast app. Miss an episode? Sign-up for our weekly intelligence roundup, Signals and Space, and you'll never miss a beat. And be sure to follow T-Minus on Twitter and LinkedIn. T-Minus Guest Our featured interview today is Jack Madley, cofounder of EVONA, on space industry workforce development and careers. You can follow Jack on LinkedIn. Selected Reading Viasat's Proposed Acquisition of Inmarsat Receives Unconditional Clearance From UK's Competition and Markets Authority Strategizing planetary defense- The Space Review ClearSpace books Vega C for 2026 de-orbit mission - SpaceNews NASA proposes “hybrid” contract approach for space station deorbit vehicle - SpaceNews Momentus tug raises orbit with water-fueled thruster- SpaceNews Space Force reviewing bids from satellite manufacturers for Space Test Program- SpaceNews Commercial Space Office's Kniseley keeps focus on industry engagement- Defense News Bentivegna named Space Force's next top enlisted leader- Air Force Times JAXA's Head Visits Australia to Promote Greater Space Cooperation- Space and Defense TRL Space awarded ESA funding – SatNews How space will help football fans to celebrate sport- ESA Audience Survey We want to hear from you! Please complete our 4 question survey. It'll help us get better and deliver you the most mission-critical space intel every day. Want to hear your company in the show? You too can reach the most influential leaders and operators in the industry. Here's our media kit. Contact us at space@n2k.com to request more info. Want to join us for an interview? Please send your pitch to space-editor@n2k.com and include your name, affiliation, and topic proposal. T-Minus is a production of N2K Networks, your source for strategic workforce intelligence. © 2023 N2K Networks, Inc. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
While the most powerful rocket ever built didn't reach orbit last week, SpaceX's back to launching its other super heavy-lift rocket. A Falcon Heavy will carry the first of Viasat's newest satellites for its next constellation as early as Thursday night. Morgan discusses the mission with Viasat co-founder & chairman Mark Dankberg—alongside the business of connectivity, cybersecurity following its Russian hack last year and its pending merger with Inmarsat.
While the most powerful rocket ever built didn't reach orbit last week, SpaceX's back to launching its other super heavy-lift rocket. A Falcon Heavy will carry the first of Viasat's newest satellites for its next constellation as early as Thursday night. Morgan discusses the mission with Viasat co-founder & chairman Mark Dankberg—alongside the business of connectivity, cybersecurity following its Russian hack last year and its pending merger with Inmarsat.
Veel nieuws dit keer over raketten, zoals Terran1, H3 en Vega C. Minister Wopke Hoekstra spreekt zich uit tegen ruimteagressie, en er is nieuws uit het 2024 budget van NASA: geld voor een sleepboot om ISS vielig naar beneden te halen en om deel te nemen aan het Europese ExoMars project. We sluiten af met een stukje Hollandse Glorie in de Arctische ballontelescoop GUSTO. Met Michel van Baal, Luc van den Abeelen en Erik Laan. Links voor deze aflevering:Lancering eerste Japanse H-3 mislukthttps://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2023/03/h3-debut-flight/ Nieuwe Soyuz en Dragon aangekomen bij ISShttps://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2023/02/soyuz-ms-23-launch/ https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/03/01/how-to-watch-spacex-nasa-crew-6-dragon-launch/11375497002/ Internationale astronautenhttps://mbd.baidu.com/newspage/data/landingsuperhttps://www.industry.gov.au/news/history-made-australian-woman-katherine-bennell-pegg-be-trained-astronaut-european-space-agency Meer duidelijkheid over de oorzaak van de mislukte Vega-C lanceringhttps://spacenews.com/nozzle-erosion-blamed-for-vega-c-launch-failure/ Mogelijk 1 miljard voor NASA sleepboot voor deorbit ISS https://spacenews.com/nasa-planning-to-spend-up-to-1-billion-on-space-station-deorbit-module/ Voorbereiding voor vertraagde ballonmissie Gusto met Nederlands tintjehttps://www.sron.nl/news/5235-ballontelescoop-gusto-klaar-voor-integratie-met-gondel Nederlandse Space start-ups en scale-ups in beter contact met studenten via OneSpaceHubhttps://www.eyeonorbit.com/2023/02/onespacehub-to-strengthen_7.html Inmarsat gaat met Geostationaire satellieten de lunch opeten van LEO IOT constellatieshttps://www2.inmarsat.com/l/321511/2022-11-17/8kdd4t Minister van Buitenlandse zaken Wopke Hoekstra belooft geen satelieten in de ruimte tot puin te schietenhttps://www.permanentrepresentations.nl/permanent-representations/pr-un-geneva/documents/speeches/2023/2/27/conference-on-disarmament-gva-statement-minister-dutchmfa See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
William is a Senior Quality Leader with 18 years in the Quality and Management system profession. He has worked across 4 different industries and is currently working as a Senior Operational Quality Lead for Inmarsat, where he owns the internal audit programme and is responsible for deploying BS EN 9100:2018 and ISO 9001:2015 across the operational division of the business. In his spare time, he does a lot of volunteering and is the Chair of the global Audit Special Interest Group (SIG) for the Chartered Quality Institute. The SIG recently held an international hybrid conference with over 240 attendees, it is a passion of his to share and learn in such a rich environment. When he is not volunteering, he can be found hill walking or spending time with his wife and new pup! A fun fact, he holds a third-degree black belt in Tae Kwon Do and is also a classically trained pianist. You can connect with William on LinkedIn If you enjoyed this episode, please hit subscribe so you get all the recent conversations with professionals from around the world working with Quality.
In this episode, Lisa talks to us about Inmarsat's work to-date and the role it hopes to play in the emerging Advanced Air Mobility sector. She also shares more insights on the critical role its Velaris network can play in unlocking the industry's unlimited possibilities and what it can achieve in the next five years. We also talk about Inmarsat's other projects and Lisa gives her thoughts on the importance of connectivity in air traffic control and unmanned aviation.
The U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced that the proposed merger between London-based satellite communications company Inmarsat and its U.S. rival Viasat raises potential competition concerns, and plans to launch a full-scale investigation into the deal.
The U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced that the proposed merger between London-based satellite communications company Inmarsat and its U.S. rival Viasat raises potential competition concerns, and plans to launch a full-scale investigation into the deal.
Hello, and welcome to another episode of CISO Tradecraft -- the podcast that provides you with the information, knowledge, and wisdom to be a more effective cybersecurity leader. My name is G. Mark Hardy, and today we are going to discuss how nation state conflict and sponsored cyberattacks can affect us as non-combatants, and what we should be doing about it. Even if you don't have operations in a war zone, remember cyber has a global reach, so don't think that just because you may be half a world away from the battlefield that someone is not going to reach out and touch you in a bad way. So, listen for what I think will be a fascinating episode, and please do us a small favor and give us a "like" or a 5-star review on your favorite podcast platform -- those ratings really help us reach our peers. It only takes a click -- thank you for helping out our security leadership community. I'm not going to get into any geopolitics here; I'm going to try to ensure that this episode remains useful for quite some time. However, since the conflict in Ukraine has been ongoing for over two hundred days, I will draw examples from that. The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu wrote: “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” That's a little more detailed than the classic Greek aphorism, "know thyself," but the intent is the same even today. Let me add one more quote and we'll get into the material. Over 20 years ago, when he was Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld said: "As we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don't know we don't know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tends to be the difficult ones. So, knowledge seems extremely important throughout the ages. Modern governments know that, and as a result all have their own intelligence agencies. Let's look at an example. If we go to the CIA's website, we will see the fourfold mission of the Central Intelligence Agency: Collecting foreign intelligence that matters Producing objective all-source analysis Conducting effective covert action as directed by the President Safeguarding the secrets that help keep our nation safe. Why do we mention this? Most governments around the world have similar Nation State objectives and mission statements. Additionally, it's particularly important to understand what is wanted by "state actors" (note, I'll use that term for government and contract intelligence agents.). What are typical goals for State Actors? Let's look at a couple: Goal 1: Steal targeting data to enable future operations. Data such as cell phone records, banking statements or emails allow countries to better target individuals and companies when they know that identifying information. Additionally, targeting data allows Nation state organizations to understand how individuals are connected. This can be key when we are looking for key influencers for targets of interest. All targeting data should not be considered equal. Generally, Banking and Telecom Data are considered the best for collecting so be mindful if that is the type of company that you protect. State Actors target these organizations because of two factors:The Importance of the Data is the first factor. If one party sends a second party an email, that means there is a basic level of connection. However, it's not automatically a strong connection since we all receive emails from spammers. If one party calls someone and talks for 10 minutes to them on a phone call, that generally means a closer connection than an email. Finally, if one party sends money to another party that either means a really strong connection exists, or someone just got scammed. The Accuracy of the Data is the second factor. Many folks sign up for social media accounts with throw away credentials (i.e., fake names and phone numbers). Others use temporary emails to attend conferences, so they don't get marketing spam when they get home. However, because of Anti Money Laundering (or AML) laws, people generally provide legitimate data to financial services firms. If they don't, then they risk not being able to take the money out of a bank -- which would be a big problem. A second goal in addition to collecting targeting data, is that State Actors are interested in collecting Foreign Intelligence. Foreign Intelligence which drives policy-making decisions is very impactful. Remember, stealing secrets that no one cares about is generally just a waste of government tax dollars. If governments collect foreign intelligence on sanctioned activity, then they can inform policy makers on the effectiveness of current sanctions, which is highly useful. By reporting sanctioned activity, the government can know when current sanctions are being violated and when to update current sanctions. This can result in enabling new intelligence collection objectives. Examples of this include:A country may sanction a foreign air carrier that changes ownership or goes out of business. In that case, sanctions may be added against different airlines. This occurred when the US sanctioned Mahan Air, an Iran's airline. Currently the US enforces sanctions on more than half of Iran's civilian airlines. A country may place sanctions on a foreign bank to limit its ability to trade in certain countries or currencies. However, if sanctioned banks circumvent controls by trading with smaller banks which are not sanctioned, then current sanctions are likely ineffective. Examples of sanctioning bank activity by the US against Russia during the current war with Ukraine include:On February 27th sanctions were placed against Russian Banks using the SWIFT international payment systems On February 28th, the Russian Central Bank was sanctioned On March 24th, the Russian Bank Sberbank CEO was sanctioned On April 5th, the US IRS suspended information exchanges with the Russian tax authorities to hamper Moscow's ability to collect taxes. On April 6th, the US sanctioned additional Russian banks. These sanctions didn't just start with the onset of hostilities on 24 February 2022. They date back to Russia's invasion of Crimea. It's just that the US has turned up the volume this time. If sanctions are placed against a country's nuclear energy practices, then knowing what companies are selling or trading goods into the sanctioned country becomes important. Collecting information from transportation companies that identify goods being imported and exported into the country can also identify sanction effectiveness. A third goal or activity taken by State Actors is covert action. Covert Action is generally intended to cause harm to another state without attribution. However, anonymity is often hard to maintain.If we look at Russia in its previous history with Ukraine, we have seen the use of cyber attacks as a form of covert action. The devastating NotPetya malware (which has been generally accredited to Russia) was launched as a supply chain attack. Russian agents compromised the software update mechanism of Ukrainian accounting software M.E. Doc, which was used by nearly 400,000 clients to manage financial documents and file tax returns. This update did much more than the intended choking off of Ukrainian government tax revenue -- Maersk shipping estimates a loss of $300 million. FedEx around $400 million. The total global damage to companies is estimated at around $10 billion. The use of cyberattacks hasn't been limited to just Russia. Another example is Stuxnet. This covert action attack against Iranian nuclear facilities that destroyed nearly one thousand centrifuges is generally attributed to the U.S. and Israel. Changing topics a little bit, we can think of the story of two people encountering a bear. Two friends are in the woods, having a picnic. They spot a bear running at them. One friend gets up and starts running away from the bear. The other friend opens his backpack, takes out his running shoes, changes out of his hiking boots, and starts stretching. “Are you crazy?” the first friend shouts, looking over his shoulder as the bear closes in on his friend. “You can't outrun a bear!” “I don't have to outrun the bear,” said the second friend. “I only have to outrun you.” So how can we physically outrun the Cyber Bear? We need to anticipate where the Bear is likely to be encountered. Just as national park signs warn tourists of animals, there's intelligence information that can inform the general public. If you are looking for physical safety intelligence you might consider:The US Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs. The State Department hosts a travel advisory list. This list allows anyone to know if a country has issues such as Covid Outbreaks, Civil Unrest, Kidnappings, Violent Crime, and other issues that would complicate having an office for most businesses. Another example is the CIA World Factbook. The World Factbook provides basic intelligence on the history, people, government, economy, energy, geography, environment, communications, transportation, military, terrorism, and transnational issues for 266 world entities. Additionally you might also consider data sources from the World Health Organization and The World Bank If we believe that one of our remote offices is now at risk, then we need to establish a good communications plan. Good communications plans generally require at least four forms of communication. The acronym PACE or Primary, Alternate, Contingency, and Emergency is often usedPrimary Communication: We will first try to email folks in the office. Alternate Communication: If we are unable to communicate via email, then we will try calling their work phones. Contingency Communication: If we are unable to reach individuals via their work phones, then we will send a Text message to their personal cell phones. Emergency Communication: If we are unable to reach them by texting their personal devices, then we will send an email to their personal emails and next of kin. Additionally, we might purchase satellite phones for a country manager. Satellite phones can be generally purchased for under $1,000 and can be used with commercial satellite service providers such as Inmarsat, Globalstar, and Thuraya. One popular plan is Inmarsat's BGAN. BGAN can usually be obtained from resellers for about $100 per month with text messaging costing about fifty cents each and calls costing about $1.50 per minute. This usually translates to a yearly cost of $1,500-2K per device. Is $2K worth the price of communicating to save lives in a high-risk country during high political turmoil? Let your company decide. Note a great time to bring this up may be during use-or-lose money discussions at the end of the year. We should also consider preparing egress locations. For example, before a fire drill most companies plan a meetup location outside of their building so they can perform a headcount. This location such as a vacant parking lot across the street allows teams to identify missing personnel which can later be communicated to emergency personnel. If your company has offices in thirty-five countries, you should think about the same thing, but not assembling across the street but across the border. Have you identified an egress office for each overseas country? If you had operations in Ukraine, then you might have chosen a neighboring country such as Poland, Romania, or Hungary to facilitate departures. When things started going bad, that office could begin creating support networks to find local housing for your corporate refugees. Additionally, finding job opportunities for family members can also be extremely helpful when language is a barrier in new countries. If we anticipate the Bear is going to attack our company digitally, then we should also look for the warning signs. Good examples of this include following threat intelligence information from: Your local ISAC organization. ISAC or Information Sharing Analysis Centers are great communities where you can see if your vertical sector is coming under attack and share your experiences/threats. The National Council of ISACs lists twenty-five different members across a wide range of industries. An example is the Financial Services ISAC or FS-ISAC which has a daily and weekly feed where subscribers can find situational reports on cyber threats from State Actors and criminal groups. InfraGard™ is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and members of the private sector for the protection of US Critical Infrastructure. Note you generally need to be a US citizen without a criminal history to join AlienVault offers a Threat Intelligence Community called Open Threat Exchange which grants users free access to over nineteen million threat indicators. Note AlienVault currently hosts over 100,000 global participants, so it's a great place to connect with fellow professionals. The Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency or CISA also routinely issues cybersecurity advisories to stop harmful malware, ransomware, and nation state attacks. Helpful pages on their websites include the following:Shields Up which provides updates on cyber threats, guidance for organizations, recommendations for corporate Leaders and CEOs, ransomware responses, free tooling, and steps that you can take to protect your families. There's even a Shields Technical Guidance page with more detailed recommendations. CISA routinely puts out Alerts which identify threat actor tactics and techniques. For example, Alert AA22-011A identifies how to understand and mitigate Russian State Sponsored Cyber Threats to US Critical Infrastructure. This alert tells you what CVEs the Russian government is using as well as the documented TTPs which map to the MITRE ATT&CK™ Framework. Note if you want to see more on the MITRE ATT&CK mapped to various intrusion groups we recommend going to attack.mitre.org slant groups. CISA also has notifications that organizations can sign up for to receive timely information on security issues, vulnerabilities, and high impact activity. Another page to note on CISA's website is US Cert. Here you can report cyber incidents, report phishing, report malware, report vulnerabilities, share indicators, or contact US Cert. One helpful page to consider is the Cyber Resilience Review Assessment. Most organizations have an IT Control to conduct yearly risk assessments, and this can help identify weaknesses in your controls. Now that we have seen a bear in the woods, what can we do to put running shoes on to run faster than our peers? If we look at the CISA Shield Technical Guidance Page we can find shields up recommendations such as remediating vulnerabilities, enforcing MFA, running antivirus, enabling strong spam filters to prevent phishing attacks, disabling ports and protocols that are not essential, and strengthening controls for cloud services. Let's look at this in more detail to properly fasten our running shoes. If we are going to remediate vulnerabilities let's focus on the highest priority. I would argue those are high/critical vulnerabilities with known exploits being used in the wild. You can go to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog page for a detailed list. Each time a new vulnerability gets added, run a vulnerability scan on your environment to prioritize patching. Next is Multi Factor Authentication (MFA). Routinely we see organizations require MFA access to websites and use Single Sign On. This is great -- please don't stop doing this. However, we would also recommend MFA enhancements in two ways. One, are you using MFA on RDP/SSH logins by administrators? If not, then please enable immediately. You never know when one developer will get phished, and the attacker can pull his SSH keys. Having MFA means even when those keys are lost, bad actor propagation can be minimized. Another enhancement is to increase the security within your MFA functionality. For example, if you use Microsoft Authenticator today try changing from a 6 digit rotating pin to using security features such as number matching that displays the location of their IP Address. You can also look at GPS conditional policies to block all access from countries in which you don't have a presence. Running antivirus is another important safeguard. Here's the kicker -- do you actually know what percentage of your endpoints are running AV and EDR agents? Do you have coverage on both your Windows and Linux Server environments? Of the agents running, what portion have signatures updates that are not current? How about more than 30 days old. We find a lot of companies just check the box saying they have antivirus, but if you look behind the scenes you can see that antivirus isn't as effective as you think when it's turned off or outdated. Enabling Strong Spam Filters is another forgotten exercise. Yes, companies buy solutions like Proofpoint to secure email, but there's more that can be done. One example is implementing DMARC to properly authenticate and block spoofed emails. It's the standard now and prevents brand impersonation. Also please consider restricting email domains. You can do this at the very top. Today, the vast majority of legitimate correspondents still utilize one of the original seven top-level domains: .com, .org, .net, .edu, .mil, .gov, and .int, as well as two-letter country code top-level domains (called ccTLDs). However, you should look carefully at your business correspondence to determine if communicating with all 1,487 top-level domains is really necessary. Let's say your business is located entirely in the UK. Do you really want to allow emails from Country codes such as .RU, .CN, and others? Do you do business with .hair, or .lifestyle, or .xxx? If you don't have a business reason for conducting commerce with these TLDs, block them and minimize both spam and harmful attacks. It won't stop bad actors from using Gmail to send phishing attacks, but you might be surprised at just how much restricting TLDs in your email can help. Note that you have to be careful not to create a self-inflicted denial of service, so make sure that emails from suspect TLDs get evaluated before deletion. Disabling Ports and Protocols is key since you don't want bad actors having easy targets. One thing to consider is using Amazon Inspector. Amazon Inspector has rules in the network reachability package to analyze your network configurations to find security vulnerabilities in your EC2 Instances. This can highlight and provide guidance about restricting access that is not secure such as network configurations that allow for potentially malicious access such as mismanaged security groups, Access Control Lists, Internet Gateways, etc. Strengthening Cloud Security- We won't go into this topic too much as you could spend a whole talk on strengthening cloud security. Companies should consider purchasing a cloud security solution like Wiz, Orca, or Prisma for help in this regard. One tip we don't see often is using geo-fencing and IP allow-lists. For example, one new feature that AWS recently created is to enable Web Application Firewall protections for Amazon Cognito. This makes it easier to protect user pools and hosted UIs from common web exploits. Once we notice there's likely been a bear attack on our peers or our infrastructure, we should report it. This can be done by reporting incidents to local governments such as CISA or a local FBI field office, paid sharing organizations such as ISAC, or free communities such as AlienVault OTX. Let's walk through a notional example of what we might encounter as collateral damage in a cyberwar. However, to keeps this out of current geopolitics, we'll use the fictitious countries Blue and Orange. Imagine that you work at the Acme Widget Corporation which is a Fortune 500 company with a global presence. Because Acme manufactures large scale widgets in their factory in the nation of Orange, they are also sold to the local Orange economy. Unfortunately for Acme, Orange has just invaded their neighboring country Blue. Given that Orange is viewed as the aggressor, various countries have imposed sanctions against Orange. Not wanting to attract the attention of the Orange military or the U.S. Treasury department, your company produces an idea that might just be crazy enough to work. Your company is going to form a new company within Orange that is not affiliated with the parent company for the entirety of the war. This means that the parent company won't provide services to the Orange company. Additionally, since there is no affiliation between the companies then the legal department advises that there will not be sanction evasion activity which could put the company at risk. There's just one problem. Your company has to evict the newly created Orange company (Acme Orange LLC) from its network and ensure it has the critical IT services to enable its success. So where do we start? Let's consider a few things. First, what is the lifeblood of a company? Every company really needs laptops and Collaboration Software like Office 365 or GSuite. So, if we have five hundred people in the new Acme Orange company, that's five hundred new laptops and a new server that will host Microsoft Exchange, a NAS drive, and other critical Microsoft on premises services. Active Directory: Once you obtain the server, you realize a few things. Previous Acme admin credentials were used to troubleshoot desktops in the Orange environment. Since exposed passwords are always a bad thing, you get your first incident to refresh all passwords that may have been exposed. Also, you ensure a new Active Directory server is created for your Orange environment. This should leverage best practices such as MFA since Orange Companies will likely come under attack. Let's talk about other things that companies need to survive: Customer relations management (CRM) services like Salesforce Accounting and Bookkeeping applications such as QuickBooks Payment Software such as PayPal or Stripe File Storage such as Google Drive or Drop Box Video Conferencing like Zoom Customer Service Software like Zendesk Contract Management software like DocuSign HR Software like Bamboo or My Workday Antivirus & EDR software Standing up a new company's IT infrastructure in a month is never a trivial task. However, if ACME Orange is able to survive for 2-3 years it can then return to the parent company after the sanctions are lifted. Let's look at some discussion topics. What IT services will be the hardest to transfer? Can new IT equipment for Acme Orange be procured in a month during a time of conflict? Which services are likely to only have a SaaS offering and not enable on premises during times of conflicts? Could your company actually close a procurement request in a one-month timeline? If we believe we can transfer IT services and get the office up and running, we might look at our cyber team's role in providing recommendations to a new office that will be able to survive a time of turmoil. All laptops shall have Antivirus and EDR enabled from Microsoft. Since the Acme Orange office is isolated from the rest of the world, all firewalls will block IP traffic not originating from Orange. SSO and MFA will be required on all logins Backups will be routinely required. Note if you are really looking for effective strategies to mitigate cyber security incidents, we highly recommend the Australian Essential Eight. We have a link in our show notes if you want more details. Additionally, the ACME Orange IT department will need to create its own Incident Response Plan (IRP). One really good guide for building Cyber Incident Response Playbooks comes from the American Public Power Association. (I'll put the link in our show notes.) The IRP recommends creating incident templates that can be used for common attacks such as: Denial of Service (DoS) Malware Web Application Attack (SQL Injection, XSS, Directory Traversal, …) Cyber-Physical Attack Phishing Man in the middle attack Zero Day Exploit This Incident Response Template can identify helpful information such as Detection: Record how the attack was identified Reporting: Provide a list of POCs and contact information for the IT help desk to contact during an event Triage: List the activities that need to be performed during Incident Response. Typically, teams follow the PICERL model. (Preparation - Identification - Containment - Eradication - Recovery - Lessons Learned) Classification: Depending on the severity level of the event, identify additional actions that need to occur Communications: Identify how to notify local law enforcement, regulatory agencies, and insurance carriers during material cyber incidents. Additionally describe the process on how communications will be relayed to customers, employees, media, and state/local leaders. As you can see, there is much that would have to be done in response to a nation state aggression or regional conflict that would likely fall in your lap. If you didn't think about it before, you now have plenty of material to work with. Figure out your own unique requirements, do some tabletop exercises where you identify your most relevant Orange and Blue future conflict, and practice, practice, practice. We learned from COVID that companies that were well prepared with a disaster response plan rebranded as a pandemic response plan fared much better in the early weeks of the 2020 lockdown. I know my office transitioned to remote work for over sixty consecutive weeks without any serious IT issues because we had a written plan and had practiced it. Here's another one for you to add to your arsenal. Take the time and be prepared -- you'll be a hero "when the bubble goes up." (There -- you've learned an obscure term that nearly absent from a Google search but well-known in the Navy and the Marine Corps.) Okay, that's it for today's episode on Outrunning the Bear. Let's recap: Know yourself Know what foreign adversaries want Know what information, processes, or people you need to protect Know the goals of state actors:steal targeting data collect foreign intelligence covert action Know how to establish a good communications plan (PACE)Primary Alternate Contingency Emergency Know how to get out of Dodge Know where to find private and government threat intelligence Know your quick wins for protectionremediate vulnerabilities implement MFA everywhere run current antivirus enable strong spam filters restrict top level domains disable vulnerable or unused ports and protocols strengthen cloud security Know how to partition your business logically to isolate your IT environments in the event of a sudden requirement. Thanks again for listening to CISO Tradecraft. Please remember to like us on your favorite podcast provider and tell your peers about us. Don't forget to follow us on LinkedIn too -- you can find our regular stream of low-noise, high-value postings. This is your host G. Mark Hardy, and until next time, stay safe. References https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/17976-if-you-know-the-enemy-and-know-yourself-you-need https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_are_known_knowns https://www.cia.gov/about/mission-vision/ https://www.cybersecurity-insiders.com/ukraines-accounting-software-firm-refuses-to-take-cyber-attack-blame/ https://www.wired.com/story/notpetya-cyberattack-ukraine-russia-code-crashed-the-world/ https://www.nationalisacs.org/member-isacs-3 https://attack.mitre.org/groups/ https://data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt https://www.publicpower.org/system/files/documents/Public-Power-Cyber-Incident-Response-Playbook.pdf
What is the value of space? That was the question posed by Inmarsat that resulted in a 51 page report that explores the value of space across a wide range of business leaders and citizens from 11 countries around the world. On this edition of The Ex Terra Podcast, host Tom Patton talks with Edwina Paisley, senior director of spacecraft programs for Inmarsat, which commissioned the survey. The company received some 20,000 responses to the survey, and some of the results are not only interesting, but surprising. For instance, the "What on Earth is the Value of Space" report found that 21% of people associate space with ‘aliens', 14% with ‘science fiction' and 10% with ‘Star Wars' – compared with just 8% for ‘communications & connectivity' and 3% for ‘broadcasting & television'. As memories of the first Space Age recede, maybe perceptions are being shaped more by popular culture – and less by the true role of space in everyday life. Younger people who have grown up with cell phones and the Internet tend to be among those who most closely associate space with aliens and UFOs, and also with billionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. By contrast, older people who grew up during the first space race see space as being more about exploration and research, as well as radio and television communications. That's just a tiny sampling of the results of the report. Clearly, there is a lot of diversity of opinion concerning the value of space, and the industry has a lot of work to do ... and a lot of opportunity ... when it comes to changing those perceptions. How does what happens in space affect your everyday life? The Ex Terra podcast is dedicated to introducing you to many of the interesting people involved in the commercial space industry, and taking you behind the scenes with many of the companies making significant contributions to the new space economy. The podcast is available on Anchor, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Breaker, Overcast, Pocketcasts and Radio Public.
Ricardo Marvão (que já foi convidado do episódio #47) é co-fundador Beta-i, empreendedor, apaixonado por educação e espaço. É formado em Engenharia Informática, com mestrado em Aeroespacial. Co-fundou vários projetos educacionais em Portugal como a Singularity University (escola para executivos), European Innovation Academy (escola de verão de empreendedorismo para estudantes universitários), Próxima Geração (academia para a próxima geração de políticos), o programa executivo Space for Business e a academia Native Scientist. Fernando Soares é economista e é actualmente gestor de investimentos da Alpac Capital, uma sociedade de capital de risco. Antes disso, liderou a direção de desenvolvimento da Universidade Nova de Lisboa e co-liderou a campanha de angariação de fundos para a construção do novo Campus da Nova SBE. Faz ainda parte do Grupo de Reflexão para o Futuro de Portugal, uma iniciativa da Presidência da República. -> Apoie este projecto e faça parte da comunidade de mecenas do 45 Graus em: 45graus.parafuso.net/apoiar _______________ Índice da conversa: (05:30) Academia «Próxima Geração». Estudos sobre jovens: FFMS, FCG. Movimento Renova Brasil. | Como contornar a barreira da origem social na selecção dos jovens? (23:32) Como é a experiência dos participantes na «Próxima Geração»? Como tem corrido até agora? | Reabilitar a profissão de político. (36:44) Como é que a experiência profissional dos fundadores influenciou esta iniciativa? Aceleração de startups. | Como medir resultados deste tipo de iniciativas? (41:48) Que esperar para o futuro? Documentário recomendado: «Knock down the house». _______________ A academia «Próxima Geração» surge integrada na Apolitical Academy, uma academia política global, como o nome indica, apartidária, e que está hoje já presente em vários países. O projecto foi lançado em Portugal este ano, e a primeira edição acabou precisamente no fim-de-semana passado. O objectivo da «Próxima Geração» é melhorar a qualidade da democracia e da sociedade civil em Portugal capacitando os jovens, ou seja, aqueles que no futuro terão a participação cívica e política na vida do país. Esta academia é como que um curso intensivo em que os jovens seleccionados têm, durante 12 semanas, desde aulas, a debates a projectos concretos que lhes permitem ganhar cultura política e perceber que papel querem ter no futuro enquanto cidadãos. Achei este projecto particularmente interessante por dois motivos. Primeiro, porque endereça simultaneamente tendências conjunturais transversais às democracias, como a polarização e o afastamento dos cidadãos da política, e lacunas históricas, estruturais, da sociedade portuguesa, como a falta de cultura de participação cívica e política. Como dizia o antigo presidente Ramalho Eanes, o 25 de abril trouxe a liberdade e a democracia… “mas esqueceu-se que era preciso também criar cidadãos”. O segundo motivo é que tem um aspecto distintivo de outras iniciativas do género -- e que vem directamente da experiência profissional dos fundadores (o Ricardo, o Fernando e outros). É que esta «Próxima Geração» foca-se não só em transmitir conhecimento e divulgar ideias, mas também em desenvolver nos participantes competências práticas, concretas, que são muitas vezes a maior barreira para se conseguir implementar aquilo em que se acredita, seja na política ou numa participação cívica mais lata. Os fundadores dão, assim, um twist progressista à ideia do Velho do Restelo de Camões do “saber de experiência feito”, fazendo os jovens passar por uma série de desafios práticos, como fazer angariação de fundos, criar decretos-lei (e aprender a negociá-los) ou fazer campanhas porta a porta. _______________ Obrigado aos mecenas do podcast: Julie Piccini, Ana Raquel Guimarães Galaró family, José Luís Malaquias, Francisco Hermenegildo, Nuno Costa, Abílio Silva, Salvador Cunha, Bruno Heleno, António llms, Helena Monteiro, BFDC, Pedro Lima Ferreira, Miguel van Uden, João Ribeiro, Nuno e Ana, João Baltazar, Miguel Marques, Corto Lemos, Carlos Martins, Tiago Leite Tomás Costa, Rita Sá Marques, Geoffrey Marcelino, Luis, Maria Pimentel, Rui Amorim, RB, Pedro Frois Costa, Gabriel Sousa, Mário Lourenço, Filipe Bento Caires, Diogo Sampaio Viana, Tiago Taveira, Ricardo Leitão, Pedro B. Ribeiro, João Teixeira, Miguel Bastos, Isabel Moital, Arune Bhuralal, Isabel Oliveira, Ana Teresa Mota, Luís Costa, Francisco Fonseca, João Nelas, Tiago Queiroz, António Padilha, Rita Mateus, Daniel Correia, João Saro João Pereira Amorim, Sérgio Nunes, Telmo Gomes, André Morais, Antonio Loureiro, Beatriz Bagulho, Tiago Stock, Joaquim Manuel Jorge Borges, Gabriel Candal, Joaquim Ribeiro, Fábio Monteiro, João Barbosa, Tiago M Machado, Rita Sousa Pereira, Henrique Pedro, Cloé Leal de Magalhães, Francisco Moura, Rui Antunes7, Joel, Pedro L, João Diamantino, Nuno Lages, João Farinha, Henrique Vieira, André Abrantes, Hélder Moreira, José Losa, João Ferreira, Rui Vilao, Jorge Amorim, João Pereira, Goncalo Murteira Machado Monteiro, Luis Miguel da Silva Barbosa, Bruno Lamas, Carlos Silveira, Maria Francisca Couto, Alexandre Freitas, Afonso Martins, José Proença, Jose Pedroso, Telmo , Francisco Vasconcelos, Duarte , Luis Marques, Joana Margarida Alves Martins, Tiago Parente, Ana Moreira, António Queimadela, David Gil, Daniel Pais, Miguel Jacinto, Luís Santos, Bernardo Pimentel, Gonçalo de Paiva e Pona , Tiago Pedroso, Gonçalo Castro, Inês Inocêncio, Hugo Ramos, Pedro Bravo, António Mendes Silva, paulo matos, Luís Brandão, Tomás Saraiva, Ana Vitória Soares, Mestre88 , Nuno Malvar, Ana Rita Laureano, Manuel Botelho da Silva, Pedro Brito, Wedge, Bruno Amorim Inácio, Manuel Martins, Ana Sousa Amorim, Robertt, Miguel Palhas, Maria Oliveira, Cheila Bhuralal, Filipe Melo, Gil Batista Marinho, Cesar Correia, Salomé Afonso, Diogo Silva, Patrícia Esquível , Inês Patrão, Daniel Almeida, Paulo Ferreira, Macaco Quitado, Pedro Correia, Francisco Santos, Antonio Albuquerque, Renato Mendes, João Barbosa, Margarida Gonçalves, Andrea Grosso, João Pinho , João Crispim, Francisco Aguiar , João Diogo, João Diogo Silva, José Oliveira Pratas, João Moreira, Vasco Lima, Tomás Félix, Pedro Rebelo, Nuno Gonçalves, Pedro , Marta Baptista Coelho, Mariana Barosa, Francisco Arantes, João Raimundo, Mafalda Pratas, Tiago Pires, Luis Quelhas Valente, Vasco Sá Pinto, Jorge Soares, Pedro Miguel Pereira Vieira, Pedro F. Finisterra, Ricardo Santos _______________ Esta conversa foi editada por: Hugo Oliveira _______________ Bio: Ricardo Marvão (que já foi convidado do episódio #47) é co-fundador Beta-i, Empreendedor, Apaixonado por Educação e Espaço, formado em Engenharia Informática, Mestrado em Aeroespacial. A Beta-i é uma consultoria de inovação colaborativa com alcance global, especialista na concepção, design e gestão de projetos, desde a estratégia aos testes piloto, com as principais indústrias de Energia, Saúde, Economia Azul, Sustentabilidade, Finanças e Agroalimentar. Co-fundou também vários projetos educacionais em Portugal como a Singularity University (escola para executivos), European Innovation Academy (escola de verão de empreendedorismo para estudantes universitários), Próxima Geração (academia para a próxima geração de políticos), o programa executivo Space for Business e a academia Native Scientist. Também tem mais de 10 anos de experiência internacional na Indústria Espacial trabalhando com a ESA, a Inmarsat, a Airbus e muitos outros em muitas partes do globo como Alemanha, Reino Unido, França, China e EUA. Co-fundou a Evolve, uma das primeiras empresas portuguesas focadas em software para a Indústria do Espaço, adquirida posteriormente pela Novabase. Fernando Soares é economista, actualmente gestor de investimentos da Alpac Capital, uma sociedade de capital de risco portuguesa com investimentos em vários países na Europa em setores como a tecnologia, media e telecomunicações. É apaixonado e tem liderado projetos transformadores da sociedade, nomeadamente no setor da educação e da política. Trabalhou 10 anos no sector de educação onde criou e liderou a direção de desenvolvimento da Universidade Nova de Lisboa e co-liderou a campanha de angariação de fundos de 52M€ que mobilizou a sociedade portuguesa e uma rede de parceiros para apoiar a construção do novo Campus de Carcavelos da Nova SBE. Faz parte do Grupo de Reflexão para o Futuro de Portugal, uma iniciativa da Presidência da República, e é co-fundador da Academia Próxima Geração e da Singularity University Portugal. É formado em Economia pela Nova SBE e possui mestrado em Economia e Finanças pela Universidade de Durham, no Reino Unido.
In this episode Matthew and Cindy look at standards and space. Matthew speaks to Alex Cacioni, Director of Flight Dynamics at Inmarsat, currently the UK's biggest satellite operator. His job is to make sure that these satellites, and space debris too, do not crash into each other - protecting what's known as the geostationary belt.Alex is also a standards-maker, a journey he started in 2015, working on what he describes as space sustainability standards, including ISO 24113 for space debris mitigation. iso.org/iso24113Plus, Matthew gets all misty-eyed and wistful about a 1970s classic sci-fi movie.There's also a Standards Desk of News, with details of an EU proposal about some technology that's very much closer to earth.bsigroup.com/spacesystems@standardsshow@thestandardsshow education@bsigroup.com
Ongoing work with MOD and pending Inmarsat acquisition are top priorities In this episode of the Viasat Podcast, host Alex Miller speaks with Keven Lippert, Viasat chief commercial officer, about the company's business in the UK. Viasat has been active in the UK for a number of years — particularly with the Ministry of Defence — and is growing its footprint with new offices, more personnel and a pending acquisition that will greatly enhance its presence in the country. Topics covered in this podcast episode include: A bit of history on Viasat in the UK, including our acquisition of Stonewood in 2010 that has been the foundation for the encryption products we provide for the UK Ministry of Defence; How the acquisition of RigNet in 2021 has also expanded our presence in Scotland with products and services for the energy industry; The upcoming ViaSat-3 constellation and how the second satellite over Europe, the Middle East and Africa represents another large investment in broadband infrastructure in the UK; The company's new office in the Harwell Science and Innovation Campus and our relationship with the UK Space Agency as well as the European Space Agency; The pending acquisition of global satellite operator Inmarsat and how it will enhance our network in the UK and beyond.
In this episode of Vanguard Radio, the topic of conversation revolves around satellites and Arctic communications services. Host, J. Richard Jones, interviews Gill Fortin, Director Business Development, Canada, Inmarsat. With experience spanning Customer Service, Operations, Technical Support, Product Management, Account Management, Sales and Business Development, Gill has seen and contributed to the changes that have helped shape the satellite industry as it is today and offers a unique perspective on the challenges faced by those requiring communications services in the Arctic. In this episode: Why are Arctic communications services so vital? Who benefits from satellite services in the Arctic? How would Arctic satellite services be used in the future? What's the biggest impediment to Arctic satellite service? How are world events affecting Arctic interests? And more…
This week we got together with Head of Corp Networks at Inmarsat to talk about their cloud journey. Sone key points we covered include: Why it's important for business leaders to fail fast to succeed faster. We talked about speed of innovation and simplicity as the key tenets to strive for in the cloud. Dan also touched on how critical Aviatrix has been for their cloud strategy allowing them to consume services in each cloud [AWS/Azure,GCP/OCI] Lastly how Dan navigated through up-skilling his teams to be effective in cloud world and role of Aviatrix ACE in doing this. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/netjoints/message