Podcasts about islamisation

PRESS REVIEW – Friday, May 2: Just days before cardinals gather in the Sistine Chapel for the papal conclave, the press speculate on the top contenders to be the next pope. Politico, meanwhile, highlights efforts by ultra conservatives to elect a hardline pontiff. Also: we look at reaction to Mike Waltz's demotion from Donald Trump's national security adviser. Plus, an expert weighs in on a viral debate about who would win in a fight between one gorilla and 100 men! There's a lot of focus in the press on next week's papal conclave, when cardinals will gather in the Sistine Chapel to begin voting on the next pope. Among them, the Philippine Star notes, are three Filipino cardinals. It's the highest ever number of Filipino cardinals in a conclave and a sign, the paper says, of the Philippines' rising influence within the Catholic Church. The Swiss daily Le Temps takes us through the shortlist of top contenders to be the next pontiff. One is the archbishop of Manilla, Luis Antonio Tagle, who could be the church's first pope from Asia. He's seen as someone who would continue the work of the late Pope Francis, with a focus on helping the poor and migrants. Other candidates include Fridolin Ambongo Besungu, who's carrying the African continent's hopes of a first African pope, Budapest Archbishop Peter Erdo, a conservative who is also liked by moderates; and New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan, who's close to Donald Trump and at the service of conservative America.Politico looks at how ultra conservatives are trying to seize this opportunity to push a much more conservative agenda in the Church. Some hardline conservatives see Pope Francis as heretic, and even the Antichrist, for his supposedly liberal outlook and conciliatory stance on same-sex unions, divorce and migrants. Now they're hoping to strike, even using smear tactics to push candidates like a bishop in Kazakhstan who has called refugees in Europe a mass invasion leading to Islamisation, as well as a pro-Trump candidate. They're hoping a hardline pope would focus more on being pro-life and family, rather than on climate change and immigration. And what about women in all of this? French paper La Croix looks at what women hope to gain from this papal conclave. It has asked 12 women – some theologians, others secular – to give their thoughts. Many of them underline a familiar debate: whether women should be able to participate in the vote.Moving on to the United States, Trump has demoted Mike Waltz from his post as National Security adviser. The move seemed inevitable, weeks after classified information was shared on messaging app Signal. Trump has removed Waltz and nominated him as ambassador for the UN. For the British magazine The Economist, Waltz's departure is indeed a loss for international Republican hawks. The magazine explains that Waltz leaves at a crucial time – amid a minerals deal with Ukraine, strikes against Houthis in Yemen and uncertainty around America's defence posture in the world. For one Washington Post writer, though, Waltz's ousting is also a sign of a complex ideological battle within the Trump administration. Waltz represented the hawks – sometimes called neocons – who are pitted against allies of Vice President JD Vance, who are seen as neoisolationists. Despite his major blunders, Waltz was seen as a stabilising force. His interim replacement, Marco Rubio, will now add a fourth position to his responsibilities. Rubio is already Secretary of State, acting administrator for USAID, acting archivist for the National Archives and Records Administration and now, interim national security adviser. As The New York Times notes, he now holds more titles than the late Henry Kissinger and even Chinese President Xi Jinping. "Marco Rubio, Secretary of Everything", it headlines.Finally, an existential debate has obsessed the internet recently: who would win in a fight between one gorilla and 100 men? Now primatologists are weighing in! The president of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Tara Stoinski, has given her expert opinion. She says humans would win because they would be able to attack gorillas from behind and in front and essentially wear down the gorilla. Someone asked ChatGPT, which feels the gorilla would win because 100 men would likely panic or flee. ChatGPT, it appears, understands the fallibility of courage: that in fight or flight situations, we'd like to think we'd fight, but most of us would just want to get out of there!You can catch our press review every morning on France 24 at 7:20am and 9:20am (Paris time), from Monday to Friday.

Gad Saad is an evolutionary psychologist, Professor, and author of “The Parasitic Mind”.  He is known for his critiques of culture and uses the term “suicidal empathy” to describe the West and its failures.  His focus is on evolutionary psychology and consumer behavior, and has been a repeat guest on the Joe Rogan Podcast. This week, he joins Roseanne to talk about the Islamisation of the West.  GAD SAAD: https://x.com/GadSaad   https://www.instagram.com/doctorgadsaad   https://www.gadsaad.com ------------------------------------------------ Sponsored By: HomeChef is offering my listeners 50% OFF and Free Shipping on your first box PLUS free dessert for life!! http://HomeChef.com/ROSEANNE. ------------------------------------------------ Follow Roseanne:     Website: https://www.roseannebarr.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/officialroseannebarr    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/officialroseannebarr   Twitter: https://twitter.com/therealroseanne   YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/roseanneworld Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/roseannebarrpodcast Merch: https://www.roseannebarr.com/shop    ------------------------------------------------ Co-host /Producer: Jake Pentland https://twitter.com/jakezuccproof https://www.instagram.com/jakepentlandzuccproof ------------------------------------------------ Music: "Synthetic World" by Swamp Dogg: https://youtu.be/2_uOB0455VI ------------------------------------------------    

Standing on the frontline in the pushback against Islamisation and the apparent capitulation of our leaders, he is unwavering in his mission to uphold our traditions and defend our culture and identity.A call to believers and non-believers alike, to stand firm with faith and courage, to protect our shared values and heritage.Bob of Speakers' Corner returns for another episode.

Dans cet épisode, Eugénie Bastié analyse la situation religieuse en France et aux États-Unis. Elle constate un phénomène intéressant : la pratique religieuse, notamment chez les jeunes, semble repartir à la hausse, en dépit de la déchristianisation observée ces dernières années. Eugénie Bastié explore les différentes pistes qui pourraient expliquer ce retour de la foi, comme le besoin de transcendance, l'attrait pour la tradition ou encore l'influence politique. Un éclairage passionnant sur l'évolution des croyances dans nos sociétés contemporaines.Notre équipe a utilisé un outil d'Intelligence artificielle via les technologies d'Audiomeans© pour accompagner la création de ce contenu écrit.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

In this thought-provoking first episode of the 'Islam and Contemporary Challenges' series, Syed Arman Kazmi sits down with Dr Arash Naraghi, a Professor of Philosophy and Global Religion at Moravian University, to explore the nuanced relationship between science, mysticism, and Islamic reform. Dr Naraghi reflects on his transformative journey from pharmacology to philosophy, shedding light on his challenges with the Islamisation of science and his enduring fascination with Islamic mysticism, particularly the works of Rumi and Attar. The conversation delves deep into the societal impact of political Islam in post-Islamic Republic Iran, the solace offered by mysticism as a spiritual alternative, and the urgent need for reform in Islamic thought. Discover valuable insights into the complexities of reconciling faith with modern values, addressing the existential "love crisis," and finding meaning in today's fast-paced and fragmented world.

Un ancien ministre de la justice au Canada est visé par une tentative de meurtre de la part de l'Iran. Irwin Cotler, un fervent défenseur des droits des juifs est sous haute protection depuis l'incident. Entrevue avec Richard Marceau, vice-président (affaires externes) et avocat général au Centre consultatif des relations juives et israéliennes (CIJA).  Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

Pierre Vermeren, agrégé et docteur en histoire, répond aux questions de Dimitri Pavlenko.

This week on Conflicted, Thomas and Aimen continue their exploration into the history of Sudan, focusing on two areas of the country which we've left off so far – but which have been hugely influential to the country's story: Darfur and South Sudan. Both these areas were brutalised during Sudan's 20th century history, and for remarkably different reasons. But it all comes back to the hegemony of Sudan's ruling Three Arab Tribes – the tribes who have fixed the country's course to conflict and caused the separatism which has long abounded in the country. In this third part of our Sudan mini-series, Thomas and Aimen take us through how these two regions faired as they tried to cut their own path against the ruling Arab elite, and the destruction they were met with, from forced Islamisation in the South, to the horrific genocide perpetrated in Darfur in the early 2000s. These events proved the brutal nature of the Sudanese ruling elite, and can tell us a huge amount about the conflict going on there today. New Conflicted Season 5 episodes will be coming every two weeks, but if you want to have your Conflicted fix every single week, then you'll have to join our Conflicted Community. Subscribers will get bonus episodes every other week, and can also join our Conflicted Community chatroom, where you can interact with fellow dearest listeners, discuss episodes past and future, get exclusive messages from Thomas and Aimen, ask future Q&A questions and so much more. All the information you need to sign up to the Conflicted Community is on this link: https://conflicted.supportingcast.fm/  Find us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MHconflicted And Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MHconflicted Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Season 5 of Conflicted is here! In this season, we're delving deep into a continent whose Islamic heritage is often overlooked, but which is one of the most consequential and politically significant places in the world of geopolitics today. That's right – in Season 5, Conflicted does Africa! In our opening episode, Thomas and Aimen are giving you an introductory overview of the continent, and we really are covering a lot. From the Islamisation of North Africa, to the ISIS cells forming on the East African coast, to the reasons why there are so many redheads in the Levant, we want to use this episode to explain just why Africa is so important and consequential, both in terms of Islamic history and beyond. We'll cover themes that will return across this season to welcome you into this truly fascinating world that we haven't covered in any real depth across our previous four seasons. New Conflicted Season 5 episodes will be coming every two weeks, but if you want to have your Conflicted fix every single week, then you'll have to join our Conflicted Community. Subscribers will get bonus episodes every other week, and can also join our Conflicted Community chatroom, where you can interact with fellow dearest listeners, discuss episodes past and future, get exclusive messages from Thomas and Aimen, ask future Q&A questions and so much more. All the information you need to sign up to the Conflicted Community is on this link: https://conflicted.supportingcast.fm/  Find us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MHconflicted And Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MHconflicted Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Support our work here - https://urbanscoop.news/support-us/In this episode of SILENCED Tommy speaks to Kent Ekeroth, a Swedish politician who is a member of the Swedish Democrats.Kent has spent most of his activist and political career warning Sweden and the wider world about uncontrolled mass immigration from countries that do not share the same culture or values as western nations.He has been an outspoken critic of the Islamic faith and has warned about the problem of Islamisation and its influence in European culture, law and politics.He has warned about 'parallel societies' growing in number calling for the implementation of sharia law.Today we hear more about Kent the man and his motivations behind the warnings he has been giving for well over a decade.

In this episode, I am joined again with the ex-Muslim Finnish journalist Anter Yasa. We talk about his defamation cases so far, and what is happening in Finland. His cancellation of twitter and other social media platforms - of his original accounts. The collusion of media and government with Islamists in the country among other things.

On Indonesia: a country without a Left.   Foremost scholar of Indonesian politics and political economy, Vedi Hadiz of the University of Melbourne, joins us to talk through the country's politics in advance of the elections next week. What was the authoritarian order that followed the 1965 anti-communist massacres? How did the Asian financial crisis lead towards democratisation – and how did the old oligarchy manage to retain much of its power? How has Indonesia become "Islamified", and what is "Islamic populism"? How do class and ethnicity/religion interact in Indonesia? Who speaks for the "downtrodden"? Is the upcoming election a contestation between oligarchic populisms? Links: /121/ Those Murdering Bastards ft. Vincent Bevins, Bungacast Marketing Morality in Indonesia's Democracy, Vedi Hadiz, East Asia Forum The demise of the left and the Islamisation of dissent in Indonesia, Vedi Hadiz, Melbourne Asia Review (video) Indonesia's 2024 Presidential Election Could Be the Last Battle of the Titans, Carnegie Endowment The Act of Killing, dir. Joshua Oppenheimer, 2012

François Pupponi, député honoraire et auteur de "La gauche en perdition, LFI, EELV, NUPES, la grande dérive" aux éditions du Cerf, répond aux questions de Dimitri Pavlenko. Ensemble, ils s'intéressent aux problèmes de séparatisme qui se multiplient à l'école et aux procédures de détournement comme les PAI à la cantine pour ne pas manger de porc.

Show Notes and Transcript Tommy Robinson's first autobiography was called Enemy of the State.  And everything the legal system, police or media does just seems to reinforce that sentiment.  The latest example of two tier policing was just days ago when Tommy was arrested while eating breakfast in a café in London.  He returns to Hearts of Oak to discuss why the police issued a section 35 order and detained him.  Why was he prevented as a journalist from reporting on a pro Hamas demo?  And why do the media hate him so badly? So much to discuss and only Tommy himself can shed light on all these questions. Connect with Tommy... X                                                    https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra?s=20 GETTR                                           https://gettr.com/user/tommyrobinson1 Telegram                                       https://t.me/TommyRobinsonNews Support his work                          https://urbanscoop.news/supportus/ Buy his best selling books here  https://trsilenced.com Interview recorded 4.12.23 Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            https://heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        https://heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Support Hearts of Oak by purchasing one of our fancy T-Shirts.... https://heartsofoak.org/shop/ Transcript (Hearts of Oak) Tommy Robinson, enemy of the state, he who cannot be named. It's so good to have you with us. Thanks so much for your time today. (Tommy Robinson) I can be named now. I'm being named everywhere. It is crazy. But let's look, there's so much to get into, your arrest for, I don't know whether you were just arrested for a bad breakfast, but anyway, first person arrested for having breakfast.  It was bad. We'll get into that social media reach. But actually people can find you obviously @TRobinsonNewEra. The problem is they won't be able to find that. They will if they put the address in. Because I'm still shadow banned on Twitter and profile banned. So if you just go and search Tommy Robinson you can't find me. Which is good that 120,000 extra people have found me in the last three weeks considering you cannot search for me on Twitter. Which I'm frustrated about. If it's a home of citizen journalism, give me back my account, why limit who can see me? Maybe it's already on from before when I was de-platformed before and maybe they had the search ban on there previously. Maybe they haven't realized that, I hope so. I hope that my reach, I'm given the ability to reach the masses. That's what it should be. So there shouldn't be limits on who can find me, which is currently there are. So, but yeah, @TRobinsonNewEra. That's where I'm at.  I sometimes think, crap, what's Tommy on? I'm on my phone and don't have it saved or whatever. Oh, no, of course I can't find it. Let me check his feeds. And at least you're there, certainly in our feeds. The one other thing is trsilenced.com for your books. Maybe mention that before we get on because... I'm on a grift. It's Christmas. I don't care. As I said, I've got three kids and they've got big lists and you can, this is enemy of the state. If you watch what happened recently in my arrest in London, you watched that little clip and you saw I done nothing. Yeah. If you go on my Wikipedia and read my criminal convictions, literally it's a list of the things you just witnessed and I get put before a judge, not a jury. I've never had a jury ever. I won't have a jury this time. I will not have a jury for an upcoming trial where I face two years. It's insane. This details my life story. You get to understand the person I am, not the person they say I am. I bought this out in 2015. I then wrote another book, was to talk about big tech censorship, government interference, the interference in government and influence they put on private businesses in order to silence you, control you. But when they control me, they're controlling what you hear. This talks about that. This was banned. Ironically called silenced. I put it on Amazon. This went to number one, three times, four times on Amazon. This was up to number three in the first five days, it was going to number one, and then they cancelled it totally. So the only place you can get these you can get this now is trsilenced.com. You can buy you can get personalised copies, signed copies. But this was banned, when you think about it like Mein Kampf Hitler's book is not banned on Amazon. You can write about Hitler on Facebook On both of those platforms, if you mention my name, or if I try and bring out a book detailing my story, they're both banned. They want to control and tell the public who I am. They don't want them hearing from me. It's quite a worrying level of censorship and control that we see. But yeah, you can get those books if you want to know any more about my life and the reality behind the headlines, the truth behind the headlines, and I'm actually just putting pen to paper on another. Because I want to get more side of course.  Well, that is the two books there. Make sure and go to the website, click on the shop tab and you can order them. And by doing that, it's a way of supporting Tommy. And actually I know people who bought two, three of them had one for themselves and passed on to friends and family. So it's a perfect opportunity. Why not? I know many of our friends who won't talk to us about any of this, they'll be desperate for a Tommy Robinson book. So why not make their Christmas, give it to them, but challenge them because Tommy, all this is word of mouth, isn't it? If a friend recommends something, then that person is more likely to have a go and have a look. And I think that's the best way of recommending. Do you know how many emails I'm receiving daily? Do you know how many notes I'm getting with the orders of these books? Do you know how many people have just turned, just realizing, now they're searching, they're shocked what they're finding. I've gotten so many apologies from people who hated me, people who said they, judged me on what the media were telling them and they can't believe how fooled they've been. What that then does is make people question everything, which is what Covid helped with this. People saw the lies, they saw the pushing of the vaccine, they saw them not telling the truth, they saw all these different things and then it's made them question a lot more. And then when they see little snippets like you saw the other day of my arrest, it opens their eyes. So really it's enlightening for people, it's good for our cause. We want people to question everything, we want them to see that they're being fooled by the media, and lied to by the media. The media are not there to give them the news, they're there to tell them how to think, what to think, and who to think that about. So yeah. Yeah. And I certainly, whenever I've been with you, going around anywhere in a town, the support you get is 95, 98% positive. I just remember on a train in London, this is probably four years ago, sitting on a train and I had messaged you something and you were there, Tommy Robinson, on my phone, probably stupid but hey. And suddenly the guy beside, packed in, the guy beside me said, hey mate, was that the Tommy Robinson you just messaged? And I said, yeah, and he goes, the actual Tommy Robinson. I said, okay, how's this got to go? Yeah, and he goes, no way. And then he shouts over to his mate, who's like six seats along. This guy knows Tommy Robinson. He goes, no way, holy shit. How do you know Tommy? And tell us about, suddenly I'm thinking, oh no, how's this going to go? But it's the norm. It's when you mention your name, the reception by and large hugely is positive. But that's the opposite of what the media try and portray. I will do one day. I'm just going to get someone to stand back and film me as I walk through places because I obviously am aware of the perception of the reception I receive. So that gives me, does inspire me. It makes me aware that they're not winning. So I get most of the time a hero's reception when I go places. And I understand. Yeah, so that they they have wished to portray this image of we're part of a fringe movement, we're not, we're mainstream. People are thinking what we're thinking, they feel the way we feel, they're seeing what we see. So they want us to be some little fringe movement and they want to portray that I'm the most hated man in Britain, total opposite. So yeah, and I know that, and luckily for me, my children have been able to see that everywhere I go. And it's not, and do you know what, their attempt to portray us as racist, I was walking through the airport yesterday, majority of people come up who shake my hand, ask some photos, weren't white. So it's like, yeah, they're not winning. They haven't won. Their lies have been seen.  I know. Okay, the arrest. So you went to report as a journalist, which is what you've been doing for years, reporting on news, bringing information to the public on grooming gangs, and of course, people can watch the Rape of Britain episodes. This was something different. This was going to report on the Palestinian pro-Hamas, demonstration and you go for a breakfast and then everything kicks off. What exactly happened and then we'll maybe touch on what exactly the powers the police currently have in the UK? Do you know what I find it frustrating. I see so many people who for once have actually defended me or defended what happened. News presenters, television presenters, radio hosts, but they still want to put this doubt over the fact I'm a journalist. I have produced in the last 24 months six feature-length films and investigative pieces. It's more than any other journalist or any other documentary has made. I go to events. I put one up yesterday. I went to Poland to cover their Independence Day. Why did I go there? Because the BBC News told you it was 60,000 Nazis marching. So I went there to give a fair appraisal of what was happening on the ground. I put another one up last night when I went to the Football Lads Alliance march. I went there because the BBC decided, because there was no trouble, not to even cover it. And anyone else labelled them as far right. So I went to see who was there. Lo and behold, lots of non-white people, people weren't far right, political persuasions from all different. I go there to give the public, which the public trusts me to do, a fair appraisal and I ask questions that I think should be asked as a journalist, which unfortunately mainstream journalists do not ask. And when I go to these events, I also question the journalists. That's why I went to this anti-Semitism march to do. I have done countless demonstrations like this. I've done pro-EU demonstrations where I've gone and questioned people about the European union, the money, the influence, who's in control of it. I've done this, it's what I do, yeah, it's my full-time job as a journalist and I went there this day, I would have gone and supported because I'm on that side, yeah, but I was there in the capacity as a journalist. When I see people casting doubt over this, I just think you're casting doubt, you're not even a journalist, you don't investigate anything, you just repeat what you're told to repeat and then you've got the audacity, like I had some Sky News presenter when I was at the Anti-Semitist one, questioning me. I think you've just bought Hamas's propaganda. I've watched you. I've watched your news channel. I've actually exposed your news channel, Jason Farrell, through covert recordings. I've exposed that you manipulate the public, you fool them and lie to them and deceive them, where you put voiceovers that weren't to a certain question. You actually change the entire narrative of what was said and fool people. So I went there to give a report. When I arrived, I sat down in a cafe to get breakfast. I was then approached by the police, who told me that my presence could cause alarm and distress. To whom? And then they stood and watched outside waiting. And all they would have seen was me have a great reception from people. Photos, smiley, happy, all normal people, not far right like the usual accusations by them. But they then, when I went to leave the cafe to start my reporting to question people, and I sat and done it in the cafe, I asked people why they're here, why is it important for them to be here, what's your views of the police's response? Because when they're talking about alarm and distress, my presence causing alarm and distress. We have 40,000 Muslims on a terror watch list, yeah? We have Hizbut tahrir, prescribed terrorist organisations in most countries, holding rallies. The day before I was in London, holding a rally, calling for Muslim armies, Muslim armies, they're meant to be on a ceasefire protest but they're calling for Muslim armies, all these different things. We've got people calling from the river to the sea, we've got people calling for the destruction of the only Jewish state, we've got them calling to gas the Jews, we've got all, we're witnessing this, we're seeing mosque after mosque after mosque, preacher after preacher after preacher, spouting the most hatred we've seen and the public have seen. No one's facing arrest, no one's facing prosecution, none of their freedoms are limited, they're not being kicked out of their capital cities. So the exposé of a two-tier policing system, Sadiq Khan's Met Police Force, coming down on me, who was totally law-abiding that day, I was at work. In fact, section 35 of their own legislation says that if someone's at work, paid to be somewhere, they cannot give them a dispersal order. But this comes into the argument where they do not want to recognise I'm a journalist. And that's because they wish to control what journalists they have. The mainstream media never give the true effect. None of their reporting is factual. They do not ask the questions that need to be asked. Whether it be grooming, whether it be the Hamas conflict, none of them go where needs to go, where you need to go and the questions that need to be asked. So they wish to control it. As anyone would have seen, I was calm. I left the cafe. I didn't get a chance to leave. I was surrounded by 30 police officers. I was manhandled, they dragged me the wrong way, realised they dragged me the wrong way, pulled me back the other way. I was trying to explain to them, if you're gonna kick me out of here, he's got my car keys. I need my car keys, my mate, that you've just dragged me away from. So if you just think you're dumping me down the road and saying, leave, I can't. My car's here. So I was trying to explain this and then boom, then they started manhandling me more. They pulled me down, they put my hands behind my back, handcuffed me. During this process, he pulled my head back and CS sprayed me from point blank range. Insane when you watch this. If this had happened to a non-white citizen, in fact, If this has happened in China, Russia or any of these countries, every politician in our country would be up in arms. They'd be screaming about it. They'd be talking about free speech, about the importance of freedom of the press. And I haven't seen one single politician mention the fact that I was manhandled, violently attacked by the police and had my rights and my freedoms taken from me. And right now they're taken from me still, Peter. I'm supposed to be in London in two days. I was supposed to be in London on Thursday to interview the Jordanian opposition leader I was supposed to be interviewing. I was supposed to be doing a sit-down with a Dubai News Channel. My job is now affected, my activism, if I want to do activism is affected. I'm currently banned from going within the m25 or I'm taking straight to prison. I'm not allowed to associate, protest, be involved in a protest. Like, they're my rights. I didn't do anything. It's like you may want to take my rights but I'm not going to surrender it to you. That's why on that day it's like leave. Why would I leave? I haven't done anything. I'm not just going to let you take my freedoms like without... Well, the whole thing of journalism because there, up to now, thank God, we haven't had an official list like you may get in some countries where the government approve some and don't approve other. It is if you're producing content, if you're interviewing, if you're putting news out, then you are a journalist. There is no, you don't have to have a NUJ card to define you as a journalist. I don't think our politicians or police know that. Police think you do. It's like, no. I've actually gone through court cases where I've got the transcripts and the judges recognize me as a journalist. I'm recognized as a journalist. It's my full-time job. You don't get to choose who's a journalist, thankfully, yeah, because we know what you do when you control the media. When citizen journalists started rising and challenging your narrative, you then try to control it through big tech. The government's put pressure on private businesses to influence. We've seen it on the Twitter files. You've seen it time and time again. We saw with Russell Brand recently. Exactly what's happening there has happened to all citizen journalists. It's why X, Twitter, is so important, as Elon Musk said, citizen journalism is the future, yeah? No one can sway what I say, or the narrative, or the news I give, no one can do that. So I don't have no big sponsorships or advertisers that can tell me what I can and can't say. So I will go and ask raw questions and give raw detail and raw footage, and challenge them, and challenge what they're saying. And they don't like that. It's not just that they don't like that, I believe there was a total other plan to this. I believe that if you look at, I organised for people to come and defend Armistice Day to make sure that our two-minute silence was not disrupted by Hamas jihadi supporters. Thousands upon thousands of men attended. Within 48 hours of being given back my social media and my voice, I received a letter from the Attorney General warning me that they're looking at prosecuting me for contempt of court because I created a film called Silenced. They gave me an injunction preventing you, the public, from seeing what's in that film. That film is a total expose with covert recordings. It shows that they are corrupt. They spent money to control the truth. They silenced people. The lengths they go to, to make sure they are in control of that narrative, is insane. All documented in the film. They really don't want the world watching that film, so they then give me an injunction saying I get two years in jail if anyone watches the film. The film was leaked seven months ago, but for seven months I heard nothing. I'm giving back my voice on social media. 48 hours later, I'm threatened by the Attorney General. I told the Attorney General politely with my legal team to fuck off. Again, you are not...  In good Elon Musk style. You are not taking my freedom of speech. I'm not surrendering to you. I will not give it up to you. You may wish to take it. Well, to take it, you're going to have to put me in jail. I'm not just going to accept that you are limiting my freedom of speech, limiting my freedom of assembly when I've done nothing wrong. If I get before a judge on contempt of court, tell me what's in the film that's incorrect. There's nothing in that's incorrect. It's a school record. It's covert recordings of seven teachers saying that they were paid. You paid them. Who paid them? The leader of the Muslim, the leader of the local Kirklees council who's now resigned for fraud, whose brother is the Islamic radical imam who made sure the Batley school teacher is still in hiding. He's the one who has organized all the protests. Our councils have been infiltrated, our governments have been infiltrated, every institution in our country been infiltrated. I made a documentary that proved it and guess what? The judiciary's infiltrated and all and it all proves it. So as I said within 48 hours I received that letter. I now face two years in jail for that film. It's not a film I put out, it was leaked, I didn't put it out, so I will fight it in court and when I fight it in court they're just going to bring more attention to the film. Like hopefully and especially when people see what just happened last weekend, people are going to realise, shit, they're going for him, this is an establishment attack, they're attempting everything they can and this isn't just, I keep saying it, this is far bigger than Tommy Robinson, you don't have to like me, you don't have to like my history, you don't like my past, you don't have to like what I've said, what I've done, to realise that we should not live in a society where government overreach, police are used, the police are used to attack people and they're not, and then they're used to enforce their laws and actually corrupt their laws and abuse their laws on certain people with certain ideas and then totally stand by with their hands tied behind their back with jihadists and extremists. People have seen it, we just saw the arrest of the Muslim who was kicking off up in Manchester and then the police let him go. They de-arrested him because they faced a mob. So who controls the streets? The mob. The mob. What they're sending out a message is, get violent. Be violent and you'll get what you want. And of course that's going to embolden these Hamas supporters on our streets. But it's also outraging the entire British public who are watching this. And it's something I've spoke about for 15 years I've spoke about from, in fact, if you dig up the article I wrote in 2004 which I used in my Oxford Union speech. I spoke then in my local newspaper about the two-tier policing. Iron fists for us, kid gloves for them. Yeah same with funding. It's funding for their community through the roof. We're ignored, white working class, we're totally ignored by our government and our politicians and our councils but that's something like I think a lot of people have watched what's happened, they don't agree with it. I'm actually going to be in court, Peter. I'm just waiting for a message now. I think I may be in court this Wednesday, if not Monday. So I will be in court to challenge the legalities of my bail conditions. Because if you watched it, I've done nothing wrong. Why am I banned from my capital city? Why are these jihadists not banned from their capital city? Why did you abuse the law to arrest me for doing nothing wrong, yet you pat them on their back when they climb up and desecrate our monuments. Why? It's so blatant what you're doing. It's so blatant to every member of the British public. I don't know if you watched the recent interview I've done with a gentleman up in Leicester, a 70-year-old gentleman, who was also issued a section 35. He was also dragged through his town centre and arrested. So what people need to realise is, if they can do this to me, you may think it's funny that they're doing it to me if you don't like it, but if they can do it to me, they can do it to you. And they're using this to abuse their powers up and down this country against one community. Not against everyone. One community gets off scot-free, the Islamic community. The jihadists, the far-left extremists, if this hasn't been a wake-up call, the unholy alliance of the far-left and the far-right and the Islamists all joining together on this one issue of hating Jews. That's what we're witnessing. So...  Well, look, that's been a... I will pick up on those who have supported you, pick up on your social media reach, but it is that... it's very weird. I'm scratching my head trying to work out this hatred of Israel, calling everyone Zionist shills is the term. I try to scratch my head because my support for Israel is biblical. As a Christian, it goes back to Jerusalem being 3000 years of the capital of Israel. So for me, it's on that history. And then you've got individuals who say, no, these Palestinians, whoever, whatever Palestinians are, and the hatred against the Jews. I've been really surprised at the veracity, the aggression against Israel. I never expected that to happen.  It's not against Israel. Israel's an excuse. It's against Jews. And essentially, you are looking, what you're witnessing with the far right alignment of them, Iran has as much money given to them by America mainly. But Iran, all of these countries are now influencing, They're influencing social media influencers, are receiving funds and money to promote the Quran, to promote Islam, to convert to Islam, all across the globe. You're seeing TikTokers now pushing it and spreading it. There is a bottomless pit of money coming out of that Middle East and they all make the accusations against us. If you don't hate Jews, you're Zionist, you're Mossad, you're funded by the Jews, etc. There is the total opposite. We're witnessing an Iranian proxy army online and on the streets, funded en masse, yeah? Funded en masse. So, and when they go on about, it's like we talk about Jew hatred or we talk about Israel. As I said, I've said this multiple times recently, people need to understand. Mein Kampf's book, Mein Kampf, Hitler's book, has 7% Jew hatred in it. The Quran has 9%, the Hadith have 12%. If a political organisation set up today, and as part of its manifesto, 9% of it was hatred of Jews. Would it be outlawed? Would it be banned? Yes, it would. Why are we giving a special protection to the ideology, not religion, the ideology of Islam, that promotes violence, that promotes hatred, that promotes intolerance, it promotes Jew hatred, it promotes sexual enslavement of non-Muslims. Why is it given a protection that we're not even allowed to talk about it? You're not even allowed to question it. You're not allowed to criticize it. You've thrown out accusations of hate speech. The only real hate speech is coming out of the mosques and they're getting away with it. You're not using the laws you've created. If anyone hasn't seen now, the hate speech laws are not there to stop hate speech. They're there to stop you criticizing what they're pushing. And Islam is being pushed on all of us. And it's like Mein Kampf is banned? The Quran is pushed and celebrated and the influence and the social media influences that everyone can now see all over the world who are pushing this agenda, in America, across the globe. They're pushing this agenda, they're the ones receiving their funds, they're the ones getting paid for it. I've always stood and said openly, look it's not difficult. Hamas are ISIS. Hamas have already come out and said, first the Jews then the Christians. Their statement, not mine. Listen to what they're saying, they're not talking about, they talk about the kuffar, they talk about the infidels, it's all of us. If you do not think, and I keep saying even to these far-right morons. Say listen, if they've murdered 1500 Jews and they've slaughtered, they've raped, look how emboldened they've become in every Western nation. They're not bothered. This has given them, we will see more jihad. We've just seen an arrest yesterday for a planned attack in Las Vegas, We've seen a French attack. The man who'd done the France attack had already been arrested previously for planning another attack. Yeah, planning. What's he even doing on the street? These people are at war with us. Intern them. Get them off the street. You know they're a risk. Get rid of them. 3,000 Muslims are monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week because we know they're planning to attack us. Get rid. If they've got dual nationality passports, fuck them off. They've got to go. The time for sitting anymore is gone. How many more of our people do you want to see killed? Now if Israel was conquered by these jihadists, they've tried it many times before, they made it clear in the seven-day war all the leaders of the surrounding Islamic nations come out and said we're gonna take your women, we're taking them as slaves. Everything is Quranic, everything is scripturally inspired. Stop pretending it's about Israel. And if they've done that, if say for example to these brain-dead morons who keep talking about freeing Palestine and attacking Israel. Do you think if the jihadists conquered Israel and they wipe out and then they're in control of Jerusalem and every Christian holy site, do you think you're going to have the right to go there to all the Christians? What do you think it's going to look like as a nation? What's it going to look like in the Islamic State? And do you think they stop there? Do you not understand jihad? Do you not understand their mindset of Islamic supremacy to rule and dominate the world. Not to rule and dominate Israel. Israel is the first step and it's coming for the rest of us. You don't see them coming through Europe. You don't see what's going to happen. It's just, it's pretty infuriating when you see the alignment of all these people joining together and it has become vocal and it has become loud and that's because they are, I'd say many of them paid, but they are also, they also have their staunch beliefs so they're very loud, isn't it? But if you go out day to day and get out of the bubbles of online, you realise the vast majority of the British public stand on the side of Israel. Maybe not the youngsters, which is why, so you see the American election now, I've been watching what's happening in America, this American election 2024 is the most important in their country's history. You see, if the Republicans do not win this, and the 4 million that have come through the borders now becomes 8 million, 12 million, of dependents who will vote for Democrats. There will never be a Republican government again. And not just there will never be a Republican government again. If you look at the mindset of the elders and the youngers in the United States and in Great Britain, our education systems have been totally infiltrated. They are winning that war. So the 16 to 24 year olds hate Israel. The extremism, look at teachers having to hide because they went to a pro-Israel rally and hundreds of students getting violent. In universities across the United States, you have one chance now, it's 2024, You need to elect a leader who's going to challenge it, stop it, stop the funding to these universities, schools, colleges, stop the sexualisation of the kids, stop the transgender movement and the push for it, stop the Islamisation, stop the anti-Jew hatred. You've got one chance. It's this year. Because after this year, America, I'm surprised how fast it's accelerated. We've been warning about it. I've been trying to warn America and giving speeches back to America since 2009, simply saying, listen, I know, I've had it, I've seen my town change. One mosque in 1982 to 45 now, you're in trouble. And we're seeing now the influence like, you're seeing all the politicians who are resigning from the Labour Party, they're on their stance on the Israel-Palestinian conflict. They're the ones that have large support, they're voters are Muslim, so they're changing their stances based on their base, yeah? Well that Muslim population, the majority of them want homosexuality outlawed. At which point in the future do you not think these politicians are going to be pushing that? The majority of them, 50 percent, said they would not report on a, 50 percent of British Muslims, not report on someone if they knew they were fighting for ISIS. 50 percent, 75 percent wouldn't report on someone getting involved in extremism. We've got a massive problem here, a huge problem. Four times as many British Muslims joined ISIS, went to fight for ISIS, never joined the British military. So we have their alignment will be with Islam first, Islam second, Islam third. Not democracy, not our rule of law, not their political parties, Islam. You have to understand Islam. People need to get their heads out of their arse, start researching who Muhammad was, start really understanding what the agenda of Islam will be. What do you think, and I'm going to do this, I'm working on something now, yeah. You go to cities, go to Manchester, look at the Christmas market. It's fortified. It has bollards this big. We'll call them diversity barriers, yeah. It's fortified. You've got armed police with machine guns. Do you know the promotion for the Manchester Christmas market is where you can buy your halal meat at the Christmas market. Your halal meat. Where do you buy your bacon sandwich? At the Eid celebrations. We're totally changing everything. Now you look at Manchester, then look, they've just banned the one in, they've cancelled the most historic Christmas market in the UK has now been cancelled. The Jewish festivals are getting cancelled. Go to Paris, Christmas market was cancelled. Go and look in Germany, we've just had more arrests this week of men who were planning another terrorist attack on a Christmas market. We had the previous Christmas attack. I'm going to Germany in two weeks to show people what their Christmas markets now look like. 5% Muslim population, yeah. I'm going to also go to Eastern Europe to show you how beautiful their Christmas markets are, how free and safe they are. What's the difference? It's the Islamic community. Now 5%, what do you think it looks like when you've got 20%? Do you think your children are going to enjoy the same freedoms you've enjoyed? Do you think your Christmas celebrations are going to continue to be the same? No, they're not. More are going to get massacred, more are going to get killed. It's going to become dangerous. say this out loud, it's now dangerous to go to a Christmas market in Great Britain. What do you want for your kids? What point do you say enough's enough? What point do we look and say hold on a minute, we're losing our freedoms, we're losing our culture, we're losing our identity, while you throw diversity down our throat and we're not going to tolerate it anymore. I want my kids to go to a free and safe Christmas market but we don't have them anymore, yeah, but that's at five percent. The increasing demographic of the Islamic community is going to continue to rise yeah because we're allowing it to. We give benefits, stop benefits for more than two, my local imam's got three wives and 14 kids. End it! Stop it! We're paying for it. They've got three houses. Just that one Muslim man has three separate houses with 14 children in it that we pay for. Okay, we are paying for our own demise. We are funding our own takeover. So at some point, and again I'll stress, yes there's some lovely Muslims, but I want freedom for my children, okay, and those lovely Muslims ain't stopping anything. Yeah, they're not stopping it. We need to stop it. Our governments need to stop it. We need to elect leaders like Geert Wilders, Hopefully Le Pen wins, I hope Filip Dewinter, I hope we see the rise of these leaders. I know that overton window is going to shift, what is acceptable to say now, certainly after Geert Wilders' election, after he stormed the election. The mood of Europe has changed, the people are awakening and unfortunately we still have total cowards in our parliament. I can't see one political party in the UK, currently the main ones anyway, that will address these issues or talk about. I've seen many people even on our so-called GB News saying, well, Geert Wilders can't agree with all of his policies. Really? Which one? Because he's putting his people first. He's defending his country first. And that's his job. That's why he's elected to do so now, yeah, is to protect Dutch people. End the immigration now. Stop endangering us now. Stop adding to the problem. When you solve the problem, maybe look at it, but at the minute it needs to stop. But we're seeing that political hoop across Europe, AFD, they're panicking with their rise and of course Freedom Party in Austria. But I want to ask you about support. I've been pleasantly surprised with some of the voices who've come out to support you and I don't know on the journalism side, I don't know whether, not on the political side, of course not, but on the journalism side, and I don't know whether some journalists are thinking, well, if they come for Tommy because he's simply reporting on an event, they'll come for me. I don't know if it's about themselves, but maybe talk about some of the, when this goes out tonight, you'll have been on TNT with James Freeman. I saw you with Mahyar Tousi. Tell us about some of those positive sides because journalists are wakening up and therefore the message gets out further. I'll say certain ones of them are legit, Mahyar Tousi's legit. I've watched him for not just recent but before it was acceptable to speak out, he was speaking out. Some of them now I think are turning because they realize it's acceptable to turn. It's like, they realise that the public mood's there. You just have to read the comments on any article that's negative about me. Read the comments. Any journalist that comes out and slates me and says anything negative about me, just read the comments. They realise the public are not on that side, yeah? The public are awake and they're just jumping, like many of them do, like politicians do, when it becomes mainstream. All the people who have said Tommy Robinson's toxic, don't want to stand near him, can't speak about him, they'll all then be wanting to. And I find it frustrating at times, as I see people and I think, mate, since 2009 we've been banging this drum. If you'd have listened back then and you wouldn't have gone with the far-right racist label, which is total lies, totally unfounded, zero evidence of, in fact all the evidence that any research has done shows the total opposite. We're a moderate voice. You will end up getting real extreme voices if you continue to suppress the public. But I just think I've been encouraged as well that people are, I've been encouraged that mainstream platforms are having these discussions. And unfortunately a lot of people have had to sacrifice a lot of things. I'm not just talking about myself. There's lots of people who are tempted to have these conversations, who would have lost their jobs, who would have been frowned upon, who have been labelled by their families, by their friends, by their community, by politicians, anything. We're seeing it in Ireland now. Ireland's going through the same faze. Anyone who says anything racist, far-right, extremist, that will break. That dam is breaking. It's going to break and people will not care. Influential figures like Conor McGregor help that. The more influential figures that have these discussions, I just watched the Trigonometry podcast recently with a grooming victim and the fact that she's sitting explaining to them that it is religious, it is racial, yeah, it's unthinkable that a mainstream podcast would have been too scared to have that discussion. A truthful, honest discussion on where the hate comes from, which is what we need to do. We need to understand where the hate's come from. Stop, oh it's from, it's because of the Israeli conflict. No, it's not, right. What, take Israel out of the equation, you don't think there's no hate here? What about all the rapes of the entire generation of our daughters? Where do you think that comes from? We're not even allowed to examine it. You're just called an Islamophobe or an ist or an ism, whatever word they use at the minute to beat you down. No, I want to stop the rapes. I want to stop the Islamisation of my nation. I don't want to just stop it, I want to de-Islamise it, because there's so many people here who shouldn't be here. They're guests here. Many of these people, the man who beheaded Samuel Paty, the schoolteacher, who the pupils actually set him up, children set him up to be beheaded. The man who beheaded him was not, he had come to France, he's a guest in France. These are radical jihadists. Get rid of them, right? Send them back. We don't want them here. At that point of just worrying about offending people has gone. The whole European Court of human rights. They're jihadists. We're at war, they want to kill us. Get rid. We're fed up of watching as children or families are blown to pieces and forever have to pick up the pieces for someone who shouldn't even be here. We just need leaders to come out and be strong. I think that Douglas Murray has been incredibly strong on this issue and helping to make people aware. And it's so important that people who have platforms just start speaking the truth. It's not hatred to say you do not want jihadists walking the streets with us. It's not hatred to point out that you have no idea who's coming in. They just admitted they've lost 17,000. In that 17,000 migrants, how many of them have a jihadist mindset? In fact, all you have to do is go through Pew Research of the countries they've come to, to understand that they shouldn't be here anyway. Their values and their mindset and their beliefs don't fit with Western values. Sharia law of the European Court of Human Rights already rules Sharia law, this is coming back to 2007, is incompatible with Western democracy and freedom. So anybody wants Sharia law, see you later, you've got to go, you're not welcome here. And to say that is not extreme, it's not hatred, it's now current, it's needed. We have to have brave, fearless voices in this debate and argument and sensible as well. It's sensible to say we do not want an alien ideology here that wishes to enslave our people, that wishes to overthrow our democracy and replace it and that voice will only get louder as the demographic changes. Tell us, just to finish off with you on, obviously, when actually did you find out you were back on Twitter? I was in Spain, sitting in a restaurant, and I was just... I saw... It pop up, @TRobinsonNewEra. I was like, what the fuck? And I was like, and so I had to check. And I was like, that's my account. It had 300,000 followers, it had 305,000, but my account had 475. So I was a bit confused. That shows they must've deleted another 170,000 people. They deleted our whole movement. They deleted, the same with Facebook. When Facebook, when Facebook deleted me, I had 1.2 million followers. But what they'd done is, anyone who had shared my stuff positively was also then deleted. So what they'd done was they cleared Facebook of our entire movement. They got rid of the entire movement of truth-tellers, people who were opposed to the Islamisation and open border immigration. They got rid of all of them. And that wasn't, so they made me a person of hate in 2019 or whatever, yeah? They went back to people who had posted three years prior, before I was a person of hate, and started deleting all their accounts. But yeah, I realised and then I looked and then do you know what? I don't remember any passwords. Anyone who knows me knows this, yeah? every time I get locked out of my phone, or every time I get a phone taken off my by the police, I can never get back into my iCloud. I have to start a new iCloud. So what happened, I sat there and I thought, well, that's my account. I don't know the password to the email address. I don't know the password to the account. So I'm looking at it. I want to be straight on there. It was a frustrating 48 hours. I'm thinking, I want a tweet. I'm back. He's giving back my account. but I couldn't so it was a yeah it's frustrating and then, and then thank you to Ian in the United States who managed to get my email address changed for me so then I received an email and then I was thinking is it true, is it real, are they gonna do this and then I received an email from them saying here's access to your account. Then I danced around my room, screamed a lot, shouted a lot, and thought, here we go, we're back, let's awaken the British public. I had to watch as all the hard work we'd done to educate people from 2009, 2015, 2017, was being undone through a highly funded propaganda piece to make Islam fashionable. It was then becoming fashionable. It's like, what? Influencers were all converting, probably under the influence of mass amounts of money, mass amounts of money. I think that what Qatar, what Saudi Arabia, what Dubai realise, do you know if you look at the figures, I've gone through this, of how much they spent to influence Islam in Europe. Look at Qatar and France. Qatar literally funds the entire Islamic community in France to build mosques, to build madrasas. Their goal, like Luton town centre, my hometown, has a shop called Discover Islam. It's funded hugely. It has a shop. Their job, and I'll quote the man who opened it, who when he opened it, my local Luton council opened it with him, his job was to bring Islam into every home in Luton. These are conversion centres funded massively. And that's where the influence used to be, getting them out on the street and converting them. Then they realised the influence is with this. It's with social media influencers. If they can get certain individuals, Andrew Tate, lots of others, Sneako, all over people are converting, boxers are doing it. I'd ask how much are these people receiving? Because what they now realise is, if we can get in, he's got the next generation of youth. If we get him to start putting out Quranic verses, how cool Islam is, telling people that Islam is the only solution to these problems, then they are converting more than they could ever dream of for a fraction of the money, because they spend billions building mosques, building madrassas, pushing it and their goal, all of them, is to influence with Islam on our country, on our people, on your children. So now I'm back. I feel that I can enlighten the public to the true nature of Islam and the dangers of it and that again is not like, look, not every Muslim, but I think most Muslims are naïve to the agenda of Islam. Most Muslims who you say are beautiful people, who I know are beautiful people, do not follow the Quran to the literal interpretation. They're not following it word to word. They pick the good bits and ignore the bad bits. I'm sorry, with the growing influence of Islam on Europe, you cannot ignore the bad news. We cannot continue to have our borders open with all this hatred that spewed against us, with these people who are being brought up from the age of four or five, indoctrinated to believe this is the word of God, to believe Mohammed who beheaded 600 in one day, who raped children, who murdered, who tortured, to believe he was perfect. Far from it. We need a big discussion on it and now's the time. It was great to see you back and when you and Katie were put back on the same day.  I messaged Katie and she didn't know. I said, your account's back, our account's back. She was like, what? She didn't know, she looked the fuck out. But she didn't know, yeah, I messaged her. And then she put a tweet out and I was thinking, I can't even put a tweet out. It was so good. And of course, the other two that were persona non grata are Bannon and Alex Jones in the States. And I'm intrigued why they... Gavin McInnes got his back recently. Gavin McGuinness got his back.  Okay, yes, I saw Gavin get his yes, yes. I have hope. And everyone who hasn't broke the law, these are Elon Musk's words. If you haven't committed a crime, if you haven't used your platform to commit a crime, I've never been arrested for anything, hate crime, racial, I've never even been arrested for any of it. Everything I put out is factual and backed up by scripture or evidence. And unfortunately, we went through five or six years where the truth and facts were deemed as hate speech. Elon Musk has given us back our ability to have discussions, free and open discussions, which is the way, which is what's needed, even with Muslims and with their imams and with their leaders. Let's talk, let's debate and let the public make their own mind up. They're going to be on our side. 100%. Let me just leave people with the books again. Trsilenced.com, trsilenced.com. Get a hold of them by buying the books you support, Tommy, and if you've had them before, or get another copy and pass it on to a friend, wrap it up as a Christmas gift. Tommy, thanks so much for coming on. Always good to have you and thanks for coming. If I'm successful in having my conditions removed, I'll see you on the 12th. Sounds good, I will see you then. Thanks so much, Tommy.  See you later, bruv.

The Islamisation of the World -  was recorded live at Destiny Church Auckland on the 22/10/2023For more information on Apostle Brian Tamaki , Please visit https://www.apostlebriantamaki.com/

North-western Pakistan, near the border with Afghanistan, is home to a secluded tribe: the Kalash people. The pagan tribe are Pakistan's last polytheistic community, who have avoided mass Islamisation. But lately they have become the target of attacks from the Pakistani Taliban, who are now based in Afghanistan. Our correspondents report.

The Islamic globalisation agenda. There is an Islamization agenda targeting the African continent Islamization is the process of converting a society towards the Islamic religion i.e. turning Africa into an Islamic continent There are over 50 countries where the majority population is Muslim (19 is African countries) An Islamic state is a form of a government which is based on Islamic law (Governs spiritual, mental, and physical behavior) (Obligatory, Recommended, Permitted, Discouraged, and Forbidden) Violations of this law may result into – Death, Amputation of hands/feet, flogging (whipping), stoning, etc. This is based on religious convictions derived from Quran

*) Constant Russian shelling and attacks in Ukraine Russian forces have been shelling and attacking Ukrainian positions on the front lines of the conflict around the clock according to the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In his nightly video message, Zelenskyy said the battle for the Donbass region and for the south goes on. He added that Ukraine is aware of how Russia is massing its forces and knows how to respond. *) Seven dead in new California shooting At least seven people have been killed in a mass shooting at two locations in the coastal northern California city of Half Moon Bay. The suspect was arrested after he drove to a police parking lot apparently to hand himself in. He is cooperating with investigators, according to the county sheriff. The shootings came after a gunman opened fire and killed 11 people at a dance club in Los Angeles over the weekend. *) UN seeking to reverse ban on women workers in Afghanistan The UN humanitarian chief has arrived in Afghanistan in a bid to reverse the Taliban administration's ban on Afghan women and girls going to schools and working for humanitarian organisations. Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Martin Griffiths was joined by two major international aid organisations and the UN children's agency, UNICEF. UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said last month's ban on Afghan women working for NGOs is sowing fears that the already dire humanitarian situation will get even worse. *) Without respect for Islam, Sweden gets no NATO boost: Türkiye Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has warned that Sweden should not expect any good news from Türkiye on its NATO bid “if it does not show respect to Islam.” The remarks came after Rasmus Paludan, the leader of Denmark's far-right Stram Kurs Party burned a copy of the Quran outside the Turkish Embassy in Stockholm. The anti-Muslim act was done under police protection and with permission from the Swedish government. *) Dutch leader of far-right group desecrates copy of Quran The Dutch leader of a far-right group known as Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the West has desecrated the Quran in the Netherlands. In a video posted on social media, anti-Muslim provocateur Edwin Wagensveld tore apart a copy of Islam's holy book, then set it on fire. Wagensveld, who claimed he had permission from the city of The Hague for the destruction of the Quran, was arrested twice before for his anti-Muslim activities.

As the first study of its kind, Gender, Sexuality and Feminism in Pakistani Urdu Writing (Anthem, 2022) offers a new understanding of progressive women's poetry in Urdu and the legacy of postcolonial politics. It underlines Urdu's linguistic hybridities, the context of the zenana, reform, and rekhti to illustrate how the modernising impulse under colonial rule impacted women as subjects in textual form. It argues that canonical texts for sharif women from Mirat-ul Arus to Umrao Jan Ada need to be looked at alongside women's diaries and autobiographies so that we have an overall picture of gendered lives from imaginative fiction, memoirs and biographies. In the late nineteenth century, ideas of the cosmopolitan and local were in conversation with the secular and sacred across different Indian literatures. Emerging poets from the zenana can be traced back to Zahida Khatun Sherwania from Aligarh and Haya Lakhnavi from Lucknow who had very unique trajectories as sharif women. With the rise of anti-colonial nationalism, the Indian women's movement gathered force and those who had previously been confined to the private sphere took their place in public as speaking subjects. The influence of the Left, Marxist thought and resistance against colonial rule fired the Progressive Writers Movement in the 1930s. The pioneering writer and activist Rashid Jahan was at the helm of the movement mediating women's voices through a scientific and rational lens. She was succeeded by Ismat Chughtai, who like her contemporary Saadat Hasan Manto courted controversy by writing openly about sexualities and class. With the onset of partition, as the progressive writers were split across two nations, they carried with them the vision of a secular borderless world. In Pakistan, Urdu became an ideological ground for state formation, and Urdu writers came under state surveillance in the Cold War era. The study picks up the story of progressive women poets in Pakistan to try and understand their response to emerging dominant narratives of nation, community and gender. How did national politics and an ideological Islamisation that was at odds with a secular separation of church and state affect their writing? Despite the disintegration of the Progressive Writers Movement and the official closure of the Left in Pakistan, the author argues that an exceptional legacy can be found in the voices of distinctive women poets including Ada Jafri, Zehra Nigah, Sara Shagufta, Parvin Shakir, Fahmida Riaz and Kishwar Naheed. Their poems offer new metaphors and symbols borrowing from feminist thought and a hybrid Islamicate culture. Riaz and Naheed joined forces with the women's movement in Pakistan in the 1980s and caused some discomfort amongst Urdu literary circles with their writing. Celebrated across both sides of the border, their poetry and politics is less well known than the verse of the progressive poet par excellence Faiz Ahmed Faiz or the hard hitting lyrics of Habib Jalib. The book demonstrates how they manipulate and appropriate a national language as mother tongue speakers to enunciate a middle ground between the sacred and secular. In doing so they offer a new aesthetic that is inspired by activism and influenced by feminist philosophy. Iqra Shagufta Cheema is a writer, researcher, and chronic procrastinator. When they do write, they write in the areas of postmodernist postcolonial literatures, transnational feminisms, gender and sexuality studies, and film studies. Check out their latest book chapter Queer Love: He is also Made in Heaven. They can be reached via email at IqraSCheema@gmail.com or Twitter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

As the first study of its kind, Gender, Sexuality and Feminism in Pakistani Urdu Writing (Anthem, 2022) offers a new understanding of progressive women's poetry in Urdu and the legacy of postcolonial politics. It underlines Urdu's linguistic hybridities, the context of the zenana, reform, and rekhti to illustrate how the modernising impulse under colonial rule impacted women as subjects in textual form. It argues that canonical texts for sharif women from Mirat-ul Arus to Umrao Jan Ada need to be looked at alongside women's diaries and autobiographies so that we have an overall picture of gendered lives from imaginative fiction, memoirs and biographies. In the late nineteenth century, ideas of the cosmopolitan and local were in conversation with the secular and sacred across different Indian literatures. Emerging poets from the zenana can be traced back to Zahida Khatun Sherwania from Aligarh and Haya Lakhnavi from Lucknow who had very unique trajectories as sharif women. With the rise of anti-colonial nationalism, the Indian women's movement gathered force and those who had previously been confined to the private sphere took their place in public as speaking subjects. The influence of the Left, Marxist thought and resistance against colonial rule fired the Progressive Writers Movement in the 1930s. The pioneering writer and activist Rashid Jahan was at the helm of the movement mediating women's voices through a scientific and rational lens. She was succeeded by Ismat Chughtai, who like her contemporary Saadat Hasan Manto courted controversy by writing openly about sexualities and class. With the onset of partition, as the progressive writers were split across two nations, they carried with them the vision of a secular borderless world. In Pakistan, Urdu became an ideological ground for state formation, and Urdu writers came under state surveillance in the Cold War era. The study picks up the story of progressive women poets in Pakistan to try and understand their response to emerging dominant narratives of nation, community and gender. How did national politics and an ideological Islamisation that was at odds with a secular separation of church and state affect their writing? Despite the disintegration of the Progressive Writers Movement and the official closure of the Left in Pakistan, the author argues that an exceptional legacy can be found in the voices of distinctive women poets including Ada Jafri, Zehra Nigah, Sara Shagufta, Parvin Shakir, Fahmida Riaz and Kishwar Naheed. Their poems offer new metaphors and symbols borrowing from feminist thought and a hybrid Islamicate culture. Riaz and Naheed joined forces with the women's movement in Pakistan in the 1980s and caused some discomfort amongst Urdu literary circles with their writing. Celebrated across both sides of the border, their poetry and politics is less well known than the verse of the progressive poet par excellence Faiz Ahmed Faiz or the hard hitting lyrics of Habib Jalib. The book demonstrates how they manipulate and appropriate a national language as mother tongue speakers to enunciate a middle ground between the sacred and secular. In doing so they offer a new aesthetic that is inspired by activism and influenced by feminist philosophy. Iqra Shagufta Cheema is a writer, researcher, and chronic procrastinator. When they do write, they write in the areas of postmodernist postcolonial literatures, transnational feminisms, gender and sexuality studies, and film studies. Check out their latest book chapter Queer Love: He is also Made in Heaven. They can be reached via email at IqraSCheema@gmail.com or Twitter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/gender-studies

As the first study of its kind, Gender, Sexuality and Feminism in Pakistani Urdu Writing (Anthem, 2022) offers a new understanding of progressive women's poetry in Urdu and the legacy of postcolonial politics. It underlines Urdu's linguistic hybridities, the context of the zenana, reform, and rekhti to illustrate how the modernising impulse under colonial rule impacted women as subjects in textual form. It argues that canonical texts for sharif women from Mirat-ul Arus to Umrao Jan Ada need to be looked at alongside women's diaries and autobiographies so that we have an overall picture of gendered lives from imaginative fiction, memoirs and biographies. In the late nineteenth century, ideas of the cosmopolitan and local were in conversation with the secular and sacred across different Indian literatures. Emerging poets from the zenana can be traced back to Zahida Khatun Sherwania from Aligarh and Haya Lakhnavi from Lucknow who had very unique trajectories as sharif women. With the rise of anti-colonial nationalism, the Indian women's movement gathered force and those who had previously been confined to the private sphere took their place in public as speaking subjects. The influence of the Left, Marxist thought and resistance against colonial rule fired the Progressive Writers Movement in the 1930s. The pioneering writer and activist Rashid Jahan was at the helm of the movement mediating women's voices through a scientific and rational lens. She was succeeded by Ismat Chughtai, who like her contemporary Saadat Hasan Manto courted controversy by writing openly about sexualities and class. With the onset of partition, as the progressive writers were split across two nations, they carried with them the vision of a secular borderless world. In Pakistan, Urdu became an ideological ground for state formation, and Urdu writers came under state surveillance in the Cold War era. The study picks up the story of progressive women poets in Pakistan to try and understand their response to emerging dominant narratives of nation, community and gender. How did national politics and an ideological Islamisation that was at odds with a secular separation of church and state affect their writing? Despite the disintegration of the Progressive Writers Movement and the official closure of the Left in Pakistan, the author argues that an exceptional legacy can be found in the voices of distinctive women poets including Ada Jafri, Zehra Nigah, Sara Shagufta, Parvin Shakir, Fahmida Riaz and Kishwar Naheed. Their poems offer new metaphors and symbols borrowing from feminist thought and a hybrid Islamicate culture. Riaz and Naheed joined forces with the women's movement in Pakistan in the 1980s and caused some discomfort amongst Urdu literary circles with their writing. Celebrated across both sides of the border, their poetry and politics is less well known than the verse of the progressive poet par excellence Faiz Ahmed Faiz or the hard hitting lyrics of Habib Jalib. The book demonstrates how they manipulate and appropriate a national language as mother tongue speakers to enunciate a middle ground between the sacred and secular. In doing so they offer a new aesthetic that is inspired by activism and influenced by feminist philosophy. Iqra Shagufta Cheema is a writer, researcher, and chronic procrastinator. When they do write, they write in the areas of postmodernist postcolonial literatures, transnational feminisms, gender and sexuality studies, and film studies. Check out their latest book chapter Queer Love: He is also Made in Heaven. They can be reached via email at IqraSCheema@gmail.com or Twitter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/literary-studies

As the first study of its kind, Gender, Sexuality and Feminism in Pakistani Urdu Writing (Anthem, 2022) offers a new understanding of progressive women's poetry in Urdu and the legacy of postcolonial politics. It underlines Urdu's linguistic hybridities, the context of the zenana, reform, and rekhti to illustrate how the modernising impulse under colonial rule impacted women as subjects in textual form. It argues that canonical texts for sharif women from Mirat-ul Arus to Umrao Jan Ada need to be looked at alongside women's diaries and autobiographies so that we have an overall picture of gendered lives from imaginative fiction, memoirs and biographies. In the late nineteenth century, ideas of the cosmopolitan and local were in conversation with the secular and sacred across different Indian literatures. Emerging poets from the zenana can be traced back to Zahida Khatun Sherwania from Aligarh and Haya Lakhnavi from Lucknow who had very unique trajectories as sharif women. With the rise of anti-colonial nationalism, the Indian women's movement gathered force and those who had previously been confined to the private sphere took their place in public as speaking subjects. The influence of the Left, Marxist thought and resistance against colonial rule fired the Progressive Writers Movement in the 1930s. The pioneering writer and activist Rashid Jahan was at the helm of the movement mediating women's voices through a scientific and rational lens. She was succeeded by Ismat Chughtai, who like her contemporary Saadat Hasan Manto courted controversy by writing openly about sexualities and class. With the onset of partition, as the progressive writers were split across two nations, they carried with them the vision of a secular borderless world. In Pakistan, Urdu became an ideological ground for state formation, and Urdu writers came under state surveillance in the Cold War era. The study picks up the story of progressive women poets in Pakistan to try and understand their response to emerging dominant narratives of nation, community and gender. How did national politics and an ideological Islamisation that was at odds with a secular separation of church and state affect their writing? Despite the disintegration of the Progressive Writers Movement and the official closure of the Left in Pakistan, the author argues that an exceptional legacy can be found in the voices of distinctive women poets including Ada Jafri, Zehra Nigah, Sara Shagufta, Parvin Shakir, Fahmida Riaz and Kishwar Naheed. Their poems offer new metaphors and symbols borrowing from feminist thought and a hybrid Islamicate culture. Riaz and Naheed joined forces with the women's movement in Pakistan in the 1980s and caused some discomfort amongst Urdu literary circles with their writing. Celebrated across both sides of the border, their poetry and politics is less well known than the verse of the progressive poet par excellence Faiz Ahmed Faiz or the hard hitting lyrics of Habib Jalib. The book demonstrates how they manipulate and appropriate a national language as mother tongue speakers to enunciate a middle ground between the sacred and secular. In doing so they offer a new aesthetic that is inspired by activism and influenced by feminist philosophy. Iqra Shagufta Cheema is a writer, researcher, and chronic procrastinator. When they do write, they write in the areas of postmodernist postcolonial literatures, transnational feminisms, gender and sexuality studies, and film studies. Check out their latest book chapter Queer Love: He is also Made in Heaven. They can be reached via email at IqraSCheema@gmail.com or Twitter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/south-asian-studies

As the first study of its kind, Gender, Sexuality and Feminism in Pakistani Urdu Writing (Anthem, 2022) offers a new understanding of progressive women's poetry in Urdu and the legacy of postcolonial politics. It underlines Urdu's linguistic hybridities, the context of the zenana, reform, and rekhti to illustrate how the modernising impulse under colonial rule impacted women as subjects in textual form. It argues that canonical texts for sharif women from Mirat-ul Arus to Umrao Jan Ada need to be looked at alongside women's diaries and autobiographies so that we have an overall picture of gendered lives from imaginative fiction, memoirs and biographies. In the late nineteenth century, ideas of the cosmopolitan and local were in conversation with the secular and sacred across different Indian literatures. Emerging poets from the zenana can be traced back to Zahida Khatun Sherwania from Aligarh and Haya Lakhnavi from Lucknow who had very unique trajectories as sharif women. With the rise of anti-colonial nationalism, the Indian women's movement gathered force and those who had previously been confined to the private sphere took their place in public as speaking subjects. The influence of the Left, Marxist thought and resistance against colonial rule fired the Progressive Writers Movement in the 1930s. The pioneering writer and activist Rashid Jahan was at the helm of the movement mediating women's voices through a scientific and rational lens. She was succeeded by Ismat Chughtai, who like her contemporary Saadat Hasan Manto courted controversy by writing openly about sexualities and class. With the onset of partition, as the progressive writers were split across two nations, they carried with them the vision of a secular borderless world. In Pakistan, Urdu became an ideological ground for state formation, and Urdu writers came under state surveillance in the Cold War era. The study picks up the story of progressive women poets in Pakistan to try and understand their response to emerging dominant narratives of nation, community and gender. How did national politics and an ideological Islamisation that was at odds with a secular separation of church and state affect their writing? Despite the disintegration of the Progressive Writers Movement and the official closure of the Left in Pakistan, the author argues that an exceptional legacy can be found in the voices of distinctive women poets including Ada Jafri, Zehra Nigah, Sara Shagufta, Parvin Shakir, Fahmida Riaz and Kishwar Naheed. Their poems offer new metaphors and symbols borrowing from feminist thought and a hybrid Islamicate culture. Riaz and Naheed joined forces with the women's movement in Pakistan in the 1980s and caused some discomfort amongst Urdu literary circles with their writing. Celebrated across both sides of the border, their poetry and politics is less well known than the verse of the progressive poet par excellence Faiz Ahmed Faiz or the hard hitting lyrics of Habib Jalib. The book demonstrates how they manipulate and appropriate a national language as mother tongue speakers to enunciate a middle ground between the sacred and secular. In doing so they offer a new aesthetic that is inspired by activism and influenced by feminist philosophy. Iqra Shagufta Cheema is a writer, researcher, and chronic procrastinator. When they do write, they write in the areas of postmodernist postcolonial literatures, transnational feminisms, gender and sexuality studies, and film studies. Check out their latest book chapter Queer Love: He is also Made in Heaven. They can be reached via email at IqraSCheema@gmail.com or Twitter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The hosts unravel the lives and legacies of two South Asian dictators; The Mughal Akbar The Great and Pakistani General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq They discuss Akbar's mongol lineage, his sometimes brutal conquest of India, his creation of his own religion and the legacy of his Mughal Empire. They also discuss Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq's coup that brought him to power, his Islamisation of Pakistan, his very successful referendum and the incredibly mysterious plane crash that ended his rule. These two dictators battle it out in Round 20 of the knock-out tournament to determine the single greatest dictator of all time. One of these two dictators will be eliminated from the tournament and the other will remain in contention to be crowned history's biggest dictator.

We talk about Islam, Islamisation, and terms such as "islamophobia" and "racism" being falsely weaponised to silence legitimate criticism of fundamental Islam.

Urdu Shayari in India has always carried the undertone of Pakistan, considering that Pakistan is an idea, and not just a territory. Prakhar Srivastava brings on record the Urdu poetry around the time of partition, and how these worthies changed colours t pretend as atheists and yet continued to peddle their Ashraf agenda of Islamisation of India and particularly of Bollywood and the Mushaira circuit.

Effrayant. Soumission et islamisation.ERIC CIOTTI Bascule de civilisation. Battons nous pour que la France reste la France.Eric Ciotti on Twitter: "Effrayant. Soumission et islamisation. Bascule ...2 days ago — Eric Ciotti. @ECiotti. Effrayant. Soumission et islamisation. Bascule de civilisation. Battons nous pour que la France reste la France.Eric Ciotti on Twitter: "Face à l'islam politique conquérant je propose l ...13 Oct 2021 — Eric Ciotti. @ECiotti. Face à l'islam politique conquérant je propose l'interdiction du voile☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆https://linktr.ee/jacksonlibon---------------------------------------------------#face #instagram #amour #take #couple #garden #tiktok #psychology #beyou #near #love #foryou #money #ForYouPizza #fyp #irobot #theend #pups #TikToker #couplegoals #famille #relation #doudou #youtube #twitter #tiktokers #love #reeĺs #shorts #instagood #follow #like #ouy #oyu #babyshark #lilnasx #girl #happybirthday #movie #nbayoungboy #deviance #autotrader #trading #khan #academy #carter #carguru #ancestry #accords #abc #news #bts #cbs #huru #bluebook #socialmedia #whatsapp #music #google #photography #memes #marketing #india #followforfollowback #likeforlikes #a #insta #fashion #k #trending #digitalmarketing #covid #o #snapchat #socialmediamarketing

Imran Khan writes a strong message for Islamisation of Pakistan in his op-ed. Shekhar Gupta reads into the greater message behind the article as Imran Khan choses religion as the last resort to save his decline. In episode 920 of #CutTheClutter, we also look at India's South Africa test loss & why more than anyone, data saw this coming. India's loss has data behind it, telling us a greater story. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by @kiaind

Anders Breivik grew to believe that his country was being taken over by Islamisation and he believed that he needed to do something about it. He spent 9 years planning and preparing to take as many lives as he could in an effort to start a civil war. For more stories of the worst people on earth, visit our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/thisisMONSTERS You can check out our new merch on TeeSpring! https://this-is-monsters.creator-spring.com/ To support the show, donate a few bucks through Buy Me A Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/monsters You can find more information about ways to support us plus contact info at our website: https://www.thisismonsters.com/

Amit Shah is visiting J&K for the first time after making Art. 370 ineffective. One hopes that he also makes a firm indication to all that MHA is finally in charge in place of the old Establishment, that included the IB. We expect him to recognise Hindu genocide, Jihad, and fundamentalist nature of Islam. We expect him to counter-squeeze the Jihad, secure the Himalayas from Islamisation. We expect him to recognise Hindus as minorities, to correct the fraud of 2011 census, and to make Jammu a separate State, and not support the fraud declaration by Devendra Rana. Sanjay Dixit discusses.

Pakistan is an idea, not a territory. It envisages complete Islamisation of the world, and of course the Indian sub-continent. Love jihad, and womb jihad is an important aspect. That's what Aamir, Shahrukh, Saif and Naseeruddin Shah do this. Munawwar Rana, on the other hand, does it through his toxic poetry and obnoxious behaviour. That's what AIMIM exhibits when demanding Muslim Dy. CMs.

Carl and Callum discuss insane racist Aruna Khilanani's speech at Yale, a controversial new book about the Islamisation of Britain, and how the Scottish government is persecuting TERFs. https://www.lotuseaters.com/the-podcast-of-the-lotus-eaters-148-07-06-21

Nigeria's Vice President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo has denied having a Christianisation agenda and only appointing Christians into sensitive positions.A widely circulated article written by “Dr Musbau Akinbode” titled “Osinbajo's Stealth Christianization Agenda” had accused Osinbajo of advancing a dangerous religious agenda by appointing mostly Christians into government.Osinbajo denied the allegations through his Senior special assistant to the president on legal, research and compliance matters, Balkisu Saidu.Balkisu Saidu describes the article by Dr. Akinbode as “mischievous”, according to reports.She listed the Muslims who are working closely with the vice-president and also disclosed that he supports them in their right to religious freedom without hindrance.FULL TEXT OF BALKISU SAIDU'S REJOINDERBefore the permeation of social media, I was one of those who believed in and re-echoed the popular saying that “the only way to win with a toxic person is not to play.” To this end, I found silence to be a very potent tool in dealing with some extremely wicked and deliberate acts of provocation exhibited through concoction and spread of falsehoods and apparently implausible stories.I have since realised that, in this day and age of fake news and cyber propaganda, it is important that lies and misinformation, no matter the motive of the initiator, are countered and records set straight. Amongst the recipients of the falsehood could be some innocent consumers who will benefit from having true facts presented. Allowing fake news to linger may create the impression that there could be some element of truth in what was propagated.It is for the foregoing reasons that when the write-up credited to one Dr Musbau Akinbode titled “Osinbajo's Stealth Christianization Agenda”, which has been circulating recently in social media, was brought to my attention, I opted to respond. Although no date was ascribed to the write-up, it appears to be a rehash of several baseless allegations made in the past against the Vice President, many of whom have been debunked with apologies issued by unsuspecting media houses misled into publishing some of the concocted stories.The new twist in Dr Akinbode's write-up is the allegation that the Vice President is implementing a “Christianization” agenda and in that wise none of the appointments made by the Vice President from persons of Yoruba extraction were given to Yoruba Muslims. This allegation reminded me of a similar baseless claim made in 2017 by one Dr. Ismaila Farouk, which Akinbode referred to, alleging that the selection of personal staff of the Vice President was skewed in favour of “his Yoruba ethnic group.” Those fuelling the orchestrated and surreptitious narrative immediately backtracked when confronted with facts and a long list of Northerners, from tribes other than Yoruba, working in the office at the time including, among others, Mrs. Maryam Uwais (Special Adviser on Social Investment, from Kano State); Ambassador Abdullahi Gwary (Senior Special Assistant on Foreign Affairs, from Yobe State); my humble self (Senior Special Assistant on Legal, Research and Compliance Matters, from Sokoto State); Mr. Ismaeel Ahmed (Senior Special Assistant on Social Investment, from Kano State); Mr. Bege Bala (Special Assistant, BPE, from Kaduna State); Abdurahman Baffa Yola (Special Assistant on Political Matters); Mrs. Susan Chagwa (Special Assistant on Household and Social Events, from Adamawa State), etc.Certainly, some of the listed allegations made by Dr Akinbode are objectionably and glaringly malicious and even laughable, unlikely to be believed by any discerning follower of the rise and actions of the Vice President. For example, the Office of the Vice President is like a mini-Nigeria. The level of diversity accomplished in the office reflects all segments of the society – geo-political, ethnic, religious, gender, and youth representation.It is therefore inconceivable for anyone to suggest marginalisation or, as Dr Akinbode puts it, “Christianization” in appointments and religious bigotry. To the specific point of appointment of Yoruba Muslims, Dr Akinbode may wish to know that, even amongst his personal staff, no less than ten Yoruba Muslims were appointed to work for the Vice President including his next in command and the highest-ranking officer in the Vice President's office, the Deputy Chief of Staff to the President, Mr. AbdurRahman Adeola Ipaye. Other Yoruba Muslims who work, at various times, in the office include Distinguished Senator Babafemi Ojudu (Special Adviser on Political Matters); Dr Mariam Masha (Senior Special Assistant on Internally Displaced Persons); Ms Lanre Shasore (Senior Special Assistant on Planning and Coordination); Mrs. Olabisi Ogungbemi (Special Assistant on Political Matters); Yusuf Ali (Special Assistant on Power); Mr Mohammed Brimah (Special Assistant on Job Creation); Mr Mukhtar Tijani (Special Assistant on Power); Ms. Lolade Abiola; and Mr. Akanni Rahman.A leader known to suspend meetings to enable Muslim participants to perform prayers; known to rescue Muslim orphans and provide them with shelter and educational opportunities that safeguard and promote their religious practices; known to host Breaking of Ramadan Fast (Iftar) with Religious Leaders and Muslim communities from across the country; known to timeously intervene in the resolution of thorny inter-religious issues with potential for escalation can certainly not be said to be promoting any particular religion.Also, the allegation of “Christianization” in the appointment of some named individuals to various positions in Government is indicative of a complete lack of understanding of how Government appointments are made or a deliberate attempt to distort facts and mislead the unsuspecting public. Save for Mr. Kayode Pitan, who was appointed by the Vice President as the Managing Director of the Bank of Industry to take over from Mr. Waheed Olagunju, who was serving in an acting capacity, all the other persons named by Dr Akinbode were appointed by the President in the exercise of his constitutional powers.The calibre of the persons is not in question. In terms of accomplishments, these are pacesetters in their respective industries. For example, Mr. Ben Akabueze, the Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation served more than two terms as Commissioner for Economic Planning and Budget in Lagos State and was the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of NAL Bank Plc. (now Sterling Bank Plc.). He has also served as Special Adviser to the President on National Planning.Mr Alex Okoh, the Director-General, Bureau of Public Enterprises, an Alumnus of Harvard Business School and former Managing Partner, Ashford & McGuire Consulting Ltd.; is a quintessential Banker and Financial Advisor who as the Managing Director/CEO of NNB International Bank led the transformation of the bank from a comatose state into a leading commercial bank in Nigeria. He has worked with various banks within and outside Nigeria including Nigeria International Bank Limited (Citibank); United Bank for Africa Plc.; Citibank New York; Fidelity Bank London; Swiss Banking Corporation, Zurich; and Grindlays Bank, Zimbabwe. His first tenure recorded tremendous transformation of the Bureau leading to his reappointment by the President.Before the appointment by Mr. President of Mr Okey Enelamah as the Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment in 2015, the Harvard University graduate, Baker Scholar, and Loeb Fellow has had a tremendously successful career in investment banking and with Arthur Anderson (now KPMG Professional Services), New York and London offices of Goldman Sachs, Zephyr Management. He also founded and served as CEO of the African Capital Alliance (ACA).Clearly, even on the appointment of Mr Pitan, the author is not questioning the qualification of Mr Pitan, imaginably considering his robust academic training (including at American Graduate School of International Management, Arizona, USA; London Business School; and Haggai Institute, Singapore) as well as his decades of corporate and banking experience.These appointments were based purely on merit. The only problem with the appointments, according to the author, was their religion. Save Dr Akinbode is suggesting that persons being considered for appointments into Government positions must denounce their religions, it is unclear why the religious leanings of the appointees should be an issue. Recall that similar allegations were made against appointments of equally deserving and competent Muslims with claims of “Islamisation” being bandied around. Such divisive rhetoric and adverse language are dangerous to Nigeria's unified harmonious existence and should be resisted and rejected by all.The Osinbajo I know has been nothing but absolutely and uncompromisingly loyal to his principal, earning him several public and private commendations and additional responsibilities from the President, including the management of the Economic Sustainability Plan, credited with facilitating the “unexpected exit” of Nigeria from one of the worst recession cycles to hit several nations of the world. The man, Osinbajo, seeks no accolades. It is therefore not every action taken by him in support of persons facing challenges that will end up on the pages of newspapers. Just because Dr Akinbode is unaware of these interventions should not be a basis for dehumanising the Vice President.Additionally, it is evil and reprehensible to drag the person of Mrs. Dolapo Osinbajo into whatever malicious campaign the author is mounting against the Vice President. This is a humble and compassionate woman, who has conducted her humanitarian and philanthropic activities in a well-guided and detached manner away from any Government activities. It is unacceptable to have persons of integrity be subjected to such ridiculous acts of scathing and baseless attacks. Clearly

Retired Canadian Air Defence Officer and former Defence Attache to Turkey and Azerbaijan Dr. Chris Kilford opines on Islamisation of Turkish Military, Arms Embargo, and Game-changing value of Bayraktar drones with Anatolian Dispatch.

In this episode, Helen and Matthew speak with Dr John Heathershaw, professor in the College of Social Sciences and International Studies at Exeter University. Is Central Asia really a crucible for Islamic terrorism? And how are such myths instrumentalised by others? In our conversation, we refer to two briefing papers. This one was written for Chatham House in 2014, and this one was published three years later by Open Democracy.

On 22 July 2011, Anders Breivik sent out thousands of the same email. The subject line read: "The Islamisation of Western Europe and the State of the European Resistance Movements", and attached was his 1500 page manifesto. He then detonated a bomb in the government quarter of Oslo, before heading to the island of Utøya, where he would become Norway's worst mass murderer - after taking the lives of 77 people, mainly teenagers.In this episode Hannah and Suruthi take a look at the childhood and life that led Anders Breivik to carry out one of the worst European terror attacks of the last decade.Sources: www.redhandedpodcast.com See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

This newsletter is really a weekly public policy thought-letter. While excellent newsletters on specific themes within public policy already exist, this thought-letter is about frameworks, mental models, and key ideas that will hopefully help you think about any public policy problem in imaginative ways. It seeks to answer just one question: how do I think about a particular public policy problem/solution?PS: If you enjoy listening instead of reading, we have this edition available as an audio narration courtesy the good folks at Ad-Auris. If you have any feedback, please send it to us.PolicyWTF: One Nation, One ElectionThis section looks at egregious public policies. Policies that make you go: WTF, Did that really happen?— Pranay KotasthaneThe series “One Nation, One X”, like another sitcom Tarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah, doesn’t seem to end. The latest season of the series is titled One nation, One election (ONOE). PM Narendra Modi has batted for this idea on many occasions before. In his latest pitch, he said:Elections are held at different places every few months, the impact it has on development works is known to all. Therefore, it is a must to have deep study and deliberation on ‘One Nation, One Election’.This speech apart, the most robust defence of ONOE comes from a NITI Aayog discussion paper by Bibek Debroy and Kishore Desai. They cite four reasons. Let us investigate the top two.Reason #1: Imposition of Model Code of Conduct by the Election Commission derails development programs and governanceAccording to this view, political parties, once in power, are brimming with development ideas but are not able to do so, that too for considerable periods, because of repeated elections. This view is shared by many people outside the government as well.The discussion paper tries to estimate the development time lost because of elections. Based on a projection that at least two states go to elections in India every year the authors conclude:“Assuming the average period of operation of Model Code of Conduct as 2 months during election to a State Assembly, development projects and programs (that of State Governments going to polls and of Union Government in those states) may potentially get hit every year and that too for about one-third (four months) of the entire time available for implementing such projects and programs. Such a situation is completely undesirable and needs serious deliberations and appropriate corrective measures.”Sounds quite serious. But hang on. There are several problems with this assessment.One, if the Model Code of Conduct is the problem, it can be changed either by shortening the length of the moratorium or by relaxing the kinds of developmental activities permitted during the election season. Even in its current form, the government can consult the Election Commission about the developmental works it plans to undertake and if they are deemed to not have electoral implications, they are allowed to continue. I’m in favour of removing these restrictions altogether. If a government wants to use developmental activities to lure its voters, it’s more than welcome to do so. If the government is promising freebies to distort voter choices, it can do so even today, just before the Model Code of Conduct comes into place. Two, the claim that developmental activities get stalled for four months a year is misleading. That’s because the code of conduct applies only to the state where elections are to be held. There’s no reason why developmental activities need to stall in all other states. Moreover, it’s useful to see the development period lost over a five year period. Assuming that one Lok Sabha election gets held between two state assembly elections over five years, the total “developmental time lost” in the state is six months. That’s an average one-tenth of a year, not one-third.Three, this “developmental time lost” argument sounds a lot like the dog ate my homework excuse. For one, governments know when the next elections are due and can reasonably plan their developmental works taking this ex-ante information into consideration. Secondly, and this is the bigger issue, this view relegates elections to a begrudgingly necessary event; a mere obstacle blocking the grand developmental vision of the party or the leader in power. Reason #2: Frequent elections lead to massive expenditures by governments and other stakeholdersThe NITI Aayog paper claims:Elections lead to huge expenditures by various stakeholders. Every year, the Government of India and/or respective State Governments bear expenditures on account of conduct, control and supervision of elections. Besides the Government, candidates contesting elections and political parties also incur huge expenditures. The candidates normally incur expenditures on account of various necessary aspects such as travel to constituencies, general publicity, organizing outreach events for electorates etc. while the political parties incur expenditures to run the party’s electoral machinery during elections, campaigning by star leaders and so on.While this is true, “massive” expenditures need to be unpacked. The first component is the government expenditure in conducting elections. The 2014 Lok Sabha elections cost 3870 crores i.e. an expense of 0.03 per cent of India’s 2014 GDP once every five years. State elections for a large state like Bihar cost a tenth of this amount i.e. 0.003 per cent of India’s 2014 GDP every five years. Even if we assume all states require the same amount as Bihar did, India would be spending 0.12 per cent of India’s 2014 GDP over a period of five years, all state assemblies and Lok Sabha elections combined. Clearly, this number is not unaffordable. It can’t be the primary motivation for undertaking a constitutional amendment exercise fraught with unintended consequences. The other component of the cost is spending by political parties and candidates. While the latter is capped to laughably low numbers (Rs 70 lakh for Lok Sabha and Rs 28 lakhs for state assembly elections), there’s no cap on the former. The paper claims that taken together, this component amounted to Rs 30,000 crores for the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. This is indeed a worrying number, more so because the expenditure is often in the form of freebies and vote for cash exchanges. But, arguing that conducting simultaneous elections will fix this problem is an admission by political parties that they will not change their ways; it’s just that they will engage in this simultaneous corruption once every five years. Fixing election expenditure requires many urgent solutions but a simultaneous election is not one of them. Besides these two reasons, there are other counterarguments that I haven’t considered at all. For example, there is a correlation between a higher percentage of electoral wins for national parties as against regional parties when Lok Sabha and state assembly elections are held together. There are also severe repercussions on India’s federal structures as state governments falling before completion of the five year period might have to be placed under the charge of caretaker governments or state governors. Regardless, what this limited analysis shows is that even the two reasons given in favour of simultaneous elections don’t hold water. We don’t need One Nation, One Election. India Policy Watch #1: RBI And Banking Licenses— RSJThe Internal Working Group (IWG) of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) last week came out with draft report that recommended a calibrated entry of industrial houses into the banking sector and for conversion of large NBFCs into banks. The usual brouhaha followed. But hidden in the brouhaha is an important lesson about the interplay between political and economic institutions. We will come to it later. First, the brouhaha.  Always A Bad IdeaThe camp against the idea of entry of corporates into Banking was led by the formidable duo of Raghuram Rajan and Viral Acharya. In a LinkedIn post titled – “Do we really need Indian corporations in banking?” – they laid out their reservations in no uncertain terms including an innuendo here and a wink there. It covered the usual grounds – risks of connected lending where a corporate house will raise cheap deposits from ordinary citizens and finance their businesses without due diligence; further concentration of economic power among few corporates in a country that’s fast turning oligopolistic and the need for the government to find more bidders when it begins privatisation of PSU banks that it can’t fund any longer.“First, industrial houses need financing, and they can get it easily, with no questions asked, if they have an in-house bank. The history of such connected lending is invariably disastrous – how can the bank make good loans when it is owned by the borrower? Even an independent committed regulator, with all the information in the world, finds it difficult to be in every nook and corner of the financial system to stop poor lending.”“The second reason to prohibit corporate entry into banking is that it will further exacerbate the concentration of economic (and political) power in certain business houses. Even if banking licenses are allotted fairly, it will give undue advantage to large business houses that already have the initial capital that has to be put up. Moreover, highly indebted and politically connected business houses will have the greatest incentive and ability to push for licenses.”“One possibility is that the government wants to expand the set of bidders when it finally turns to privatizing some of our public sector banks. It would be a mistake, as we have said in an earlier paper, to sell a public sector bank to an untested industrial house.”Do We Need More Banks?The short answer is yes. Look at India’s ambitions. A 5 trillion economy by 2025 that’s a global economic powerhouse. Keep your dose of realism aside for a moment. If India has to even make a fist of this ambition, it needs a robust, deep and competitive banking sector. What do we have today? A total of maybe six and a half large banks that have the capital, management strength and the ambition to support this vision.   India is still severely underbanked. Credit to GDP is about 56 per cent which is woefully short of what a fast-growing economy needs. PSU banks that fanned out into the interiors hardly built a deposit base or managed to support enterprise at scale outside of urban centres. Despite such modest achievements, almost every PSU bank has drained taxpayers’ money with very little to show for. Turning PSUs around is nigh impossible. It is easy to recommend professionalising the management but there’s no easy way to achieve it. The government has mixed up its role of being a regulator, shareholder and the management. All sorts of conflicts of interest follow. The benefits of running PSU banks are concentrated among bureaucrats, employee unions and politicians who use them to pump prime the economy when it is politically expedient. The costs are diffused among millions of taxpayers. No wonder the market cap of all PSU banks put together is smaller than the biggest private sector bank.  Is there really an alternative to big businesses or large NBFCs (many of whom have corporate houses as promoters) to support India’s ambitions? Who else has the ability to bring in patient capital and support a bank for a period of time in future?Fait Accompli?So, does this mean we will soon have corporate houses being issued bank licenses? In my opinion that’s unlikely unless government really nudges the RBI in that direction. I have my reasons:In the current dispensation itself, many NBFCs could have applied for banking license over the last five years. But they haven’t. Why? The capital requirements needed to run a bank are very different from that of an NBFC. That apart, the NBFCs face far relaxed regulatory oversight than banks. No wonder none of the NBFCs have touched it with a barge pole over the years.RBI will have to change the Banking Act, 1949 through a bill passed in the Parliament. Following that there will be a ‘fit and proper’ filter that will be with the RBI to decide on who to give the license. The IWG report suggests some of these will be made more onerous for the applicants.This is still a political hot potato. There are many voices within the government who might not be comfortable with this. The pressure group of unions, bureaucrats and opinion makers still wield significant power to block the entry of corporate houses.RBI will continue to make it very difficult for anyone applying the bank licenseSo, what’s happening here? Why is RBI coming out with a paper for allowing corporates in Banks while simultaneously making the criteria impossible to achieve. A Balancing ActRBI as an economic institution understands the need for more banks in India. But it does not believe the political institutions in India will be able to manage the conflict of interest inherent in having large corporates as banks. So on one hand it wants to show the political leadership it is supporting their aspirations in ambitions by re-looking at the guidelines for new licenses while making the conditions of the guidelines so onerous that it will make the license unattractive for an industrial house.For nations to succeed (like Acemoglu and Robinson have argued), its institutions have to be strong. In my view, a nation has to have its political and economic institutions in sync with another. It is difficult for it to have its political institutions extractive, exclusionary and rent-seeking while its economic institutions are liberal and inclusive; and yet succeed in the long run. Having an extractive and exclusionary political institution while continuing to work with economic institutions that are free and inclusive is an unstable equilibrium. Sooner or later, the extractive nature of one type of institutions casts its long shadow on everything. The post-independent history of India speaks to this phenomenon. Following Independence, India chose a model where its political institutions were by design inclusive and liberal while its economic institutions came to be dominated by the state. In the late 60s, Indira Gandhi found it expedient to double down on the state control of economy in order to consolidate herself politically. This led to the nationalisation of various sectors including that of banks. As this domination and undermining of economic institutions turned complete, the political institutions couldn’t stay beyond it. The judiciary became subservient, roles like governors of state turned into rubber stamps, Article 356 was liberally used to dismiss state governments at slightest of pretexts and most independent institutions were packed with sycophants. No surprise then this culminated into the emergency of 1975. The crisis of having both political and economic institutions that were extractive reached a point of no return by 1991. That’s when we decided to take a sharp turn away on how we’d like to manage our financial situation. The state reduced its control on factors of production, multiple independent regulators were born and a relativity free market came in to play. The feedback loop of the liberalisation of economic institutions soon started coming up against the extractive nature of political institutions. Through some fortunate circumstances of coalition politics, enlightened leadership and favourable global conditions, the political institutions began to change in the image of the liberal economic institutions. This was reflected in a more active election commission, laws like RTI being passed and the courts actively preserving the liberties of the citizenry. However, over the last decade or so, the political institutions in India have turned the clock back on being extractive. Electoral victories on the back of a strong leader, a decimated opposition and the power of majoritarian politics have meant we have reversed the gains we made post-liberalisation on making our political institutions freer. As the feedback loops in, the economic institutions are starting to corrode. This is where RBI finds itself today. It still is a free and liberal institution that’s walking the tightrope between a democratic mandate (that the government represents) and its own independent thinking. The draft IWG report in that sense is its stand. It will play ball yet not play it at the same time. It is anyone’s guess how long it can continue to do so. The right solution of course is to go back to the path of strong, free and inclusive political AND economic institutions. But that doesn’t look likely anytime soon. It is a lost opportunity.   India Policy Watch #2: Farmers’ ProtestsInsights on burning policy issues in India— Pranay KotasthaneWe warned in edition #70:Any reform that is even remotely seen to impact the MSP gravy train is bound to face opposition from a host of incumbent beneficiaries. One, the farmers growing the 22 crops backed by the MSP. Two, the traders getting a percentage of the MSP. And three, the state governments making money by charging hefty commissions for the sale of produce at APMCs. None of this is surprising.That apart, we mentioned two critiques merit serious attention: one, the timing of these reforms amidst the worst economic crisis in decades meant that the government needed to align the cognitive maps of those losing out. Two, the government fostered suspicions because the three farm laws said nothing about the impact on the existing procurement price mechanisms.Unfortunately, the anticipated unintended consequences have played out according to the script above. Farmers in Punjab and Haryana are agitating while the government has not come out with a reconciliatory offer yet. As usual, Pratap Bhanu Mehta’s article takes the long view. He writes:“Given the far-reaching changes we need in agriculture in Punjab, it is important that the trust between the state and the farmer remains. A good faith dialogue that gives the farmers reasonable assurances and a face-saver is necessary. It is easy for the government to win. But how many times in Indian politics have we won short-term victories that create long-term political precariousness?”Just like the GST compensation cess issue, the union government has pushed through a big change without getting other political parties or state governments onboard. These specific reforms might still go through but future negotiations will become even more difficult. Parties to the table will come with ossified positions. That’s a precursor to policy paralysis. We have seen this movie before.In the crisis situation we find ourselves in, it is all the more important that the union government’s reform agenda should factor in distributional consequences of those losing out. The government needs to build bridges. Politics, after all, is the art of the possible, as Bismarck said.HomeWorkReading and listening recommendations on public policy matters[Podcast]: Acemoglu talks with Russ Roberts on why institutions matter.[Article]: Jagdeep Chokkar and Sanjay Kumar make a solid case against simultaneous polls.[Podcast]: In the second Puliyabaazi episode on Indian banking history, Amol Agrawal shares fascinating insights on princely state banking, the feud with the State Bank of Pakistan, priority sector lending, and lots more.[Article]: Mohammad Taqi in TheWire writes how “Pakistan’s Islamisation started almost a decade before its birth, and long before any army dictator or adventurist general came along.” Even Pakistan didn’t become Pakistan all of a sudden. Something for us to reflect on in India. If you like the kind of things this newsletter talks about, consider taking up the Takshashila Institution’s Post Graduate Programme in Public Policy (PGP) course. It’s a 48-week in-depth online course meant for working professionals. Applications for the Jan 2021 cohort are now open. For more details, check here. Get on the email list at publicpolicy.substack.com

durée : 00:03:31 - Le journal de presque 17h17 - De la tempête Alex en Côte d'Azur à Donald et Mélania Trump positifs au Covid-19, en passant par les manifestations à Paris des gérants de salles de sport excédées par les mesures anti-Covid, voici les actus de ce 2 octobre.

durée : 00:03:31 - Le journal de presque 17h17 - De la tempête Alex en Côte d'Azur à Donald et Mélania Trump positifs au Covid-19, en passant par les manifestations à Paris des gérants de salles de sport excédées par les mesures anti-Covid, voici les actus de ce 2 octobre.

durée : 00:03:31 - Le journal de presque 17h17 - De la tempête Alex en Côte d'Azur à Donald et Mélania Trump positifs au Covid-19, en passant par les manifestations à Paris des gérants de salles de sport excédées par les mesures anti-Covid, voici les actus de ce 2 octobre.

New evidence has emerged about China’s large-scale destruction of mosques, mazars and continued building of detention centres for its Uyghur Muslim population in Xinjiang. In episode 577 of Cut The Clutter, Shekhar Gupta explains where the tensions rise from, the geo-strategic picture of Xinjiang & the Muslim World’s silence.Research by Taran Deol, Unnati Sharma & Srijan Shukla----more----View the ASPI report here: https://xjdp.aspi.org.au/----more----Read the article by Col Vinayak Bhatt (retd) here: https://theprint.in/world/china-separates-kids-from-parents-in-xinjiang-gulags-as-uyghur-muslim-suppression-mounts/261608/----more----Read Mike Pompeo's article here: https://www.state.gov/ccpabuses----more----Read the New York Times report here: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/09/25/world/asia/xinjiang-china-religious-site.html----more----Read Abduweli Ayup article here: https://medium.com/@yanmaymiz/4-577-uyghurs-stories-we-documented-in-istanbul-417b0c5b4589

Hugo Micheron est un enseignant-chercheur français en sciences politiques, sociologie et géopolitique spécialiste de la radicalisation islamique et des relations entre la France et le Moyen-Orient. Auteur du Jihadisme Français. A l'heure des procès de Charlie Hebdo, il m'a semblé essentiel de nous poser un moment pour comprendre les problématiques autour de la radicalisation d'un toute petite minorité des musulmans. Nous avons tou.te.s été très profondément choqué par les attentats qui nous ont touché en plein coeur et cela mérité éclaircissement - pourtant personne ne prend vraiment le temps pour comprendre et chacun y va de sa petite phrase. En 2008, les musulmans représentaient environ 9% de la population française (non pratiquant inclus) et si nous souhaitons vivre ensemble, il est central de parler de ces sujets. Nous avons tout.e.s plus ou moins en tête ce discours de Nasser répondant sur le port du voile en Egypte il y a presque 70 ans. Il faut donc comprendre ce qui s'est passé entre ces 2 périodes pour que nous en arrivions aux atrocités dont la France et d'autres pays ont été victimes. Surtout il faut casser les idées reçues comme l'association classique: banlieue - violence - jihadisme. Comme souvent, les prises de parole sur ce sujet sont totalement binaires, chacun y va de son avis sans vraiment comprendre la problématique et surtout les bien pensants considèrent trop souvent qu'il serait raciste d'évoquer cette radicalisation (aussi minime soit elle) et laisse donc l'extrême droite s'emparer du sujet avec les conséquences que l'on connait. Pourtant, c'est un sujet central qu'il faut explorer dans le détail pour le comprendre et c'est la raison pour laquelle cet épisode dure 50 minutes. Hugo est le seul français a être allé interviewer plus de 50 jihadistes en prison pour comprendre leur mode de fonctionnement. Son ouvrage, très accessible, fait totalement référence aujourd'hui pour l'ensemble de la classe politique. Et pour cause, c'est le seul depuis longtemps qui a abordé le sujet de manière neutre et posé. On y parle aussi de la position des femmes souvent considérées comme victimes alors qu'elles sont parfaitement actives ce qui nous emmène sur le port du voile, une question très discuté en France. Nous faisons évidemment référence au salafisme et à ce que signifie "être un bon musulman" aujourd'hui....

On this week's episode of Omonye's Corner, I am speaking to an amazing group of guests about cultural appropriation! Fairooz, Fatmata, Gracie, Zaynah, Timi and I delve into defining cultural appropriation, celebrity examples, and even a debate closer to all of us as young people. We really had so much fun recording this discussion, and we hope you enjoy it too! Take the time to have a listen either alone or with a group of friends! And start a dialogue!! Discuss this issue with your friends and let me know on Instagram what you thought! Socials : Gracie - @gracie.oddiejames Fairooz - @fai.r.oo.z Timi - @x.ephyrae Zaynah - @zaynah.z Fatmata- @fxtmatadx Resources: Tik Tok about some of the tensions between Africans and African-Americans https://vm.tiktok.com/ZS5W8na7/ Beyoncé thread about her relationship with Africa https://twitter.com/dimssoo/status/1277276116290584578?s=21 Slice and Rice YouTube channel video - a black man takes his Korean girlfriend to get her hair braided https://youtu.be/bzKiLgtOMt4 Grapevine Episodes on Cultural Appropriation https://youtu.be/XDtHrlQ2cWY - Iggy Azalea https://youtu.be/Z9NTvCyprsA- Bruno Mars part 1 https://youtu.be/SUxtzhplZtI - Bruno Mars part 2 https://youtu.be/ubjud6LZk8c - Culture Vultures Elle documentary about braids and appropriation https://youtu.be/yFGwmUCH9aI https://www.jstor.org/stable/4328193 - article on the Islamisation of Sudan Examples of other women accused of cultural appropriation: - Malu Trevejo - Bhad Barbie - Woah Vicky Do you think these are cultural appropriators or appreciators? Be sure to follow @omonyes_corner for podcast updates and other great content.

Islamisation : le virus du XXIe siècle ? - Joachim Véliocas by Action française

Faiz’s iconic poem ‘Hum Dekhenge’ has always been borrowed by protesting voices across the globe. The poem calls out the oppressors of every age, ideology and society. The poem was written as a mark of protest against the regime of Pakistani dictator Zia-ul-Haq, whose government was communal and regressive. A set of laws called the ‘Hudood Ordinances’ was the central policy of his government to ensure proper ‘Islamisation’ of Pakistan. Hudood, or Hadd, means ‘limits’, and the law ordered the people of Pakistan to identify and remain well within the limits defined by the government. It is this religious fundamentalism that prompted Faiz to pen ‘Hum Dekhenge’ — a song that has since been the voice of Inquilaab or revolution. Recently, this piece of poetry found its critics who alleged that the poem has an orthodox Islamic character because of a few lines written in it. In this episode of Urdunama, The Quint’s Fabeha Syed explains the poem for you. And how using Islamic imagery, Faiz not only attacks the ultra-Islamic regime of Pakistani dictator Zia-ul-Haq, but also invokes the power of eternal truth and justice. Tune in. Host, Writer and Sound Designer: Fabeha Syed Editor: Shelly Walia Music: Big Bang Fuzz

1 - La censure sur Youtube, 2- Mueller témoignera devant le Congrès, 3- Islamisation du Canada. 4- Le sport comme outil politique? Appuyez Radio-Québec: http://www.paypal.me/alexiscossette

Originally recorded 13th April 2019 at a private location. Produced by Talha Ahsan. You can read more about Yusuf Chaudhary's work at yusufchaudhary.wordpress.com and follow him on Twitter @ayusuf_c.

The 46-minute conclusion of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/crywvxg3qtdlkq06ubanmb7x66hcmpkb

The 46-minute conclusion of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/crywvxg3qtdlkq06ubanmb7x66hcmpkb

The 46-minute conclusion of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/crywvxg3qtdlkq06ubanmb7x66hcmpkb

The 46-minute conclusion of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/crywvxg3qtdlkq06ubanmb7x66hcmpkb

The 46-minute conclusion of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/crywvxg3qtdlkq06ubanmb7x66hcmpkb

The 46-minute conclusion of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/crywvxg3qtdlkq06ubanmb7x66hcmpkb

The 58-minute continuation of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showFBI: 1,000 homegrown jihad terror investigations active in US, not counting Islamic State and al-Qaeda suspectshttps://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/fbi-1000-homegrown-jihad-terror-investigations-active-in-us-not-counting-islamic-state-and-al-qaeda-suspectsIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/4izwya7l2sos6kxm5vvg695ivpzja2vh

The 58-minute continuation of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showFBI: 1,000 homegrown jihad terror investigations active in US, not counting Islamic State and al-Qaeda suspectshttps://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/fbi-1000-homegrown-jihad-terror-investigations-active-in-us-not-counting-islamic-state-and-al-qaeda-suspectsIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/4izwya7l2sos6kxm5vvg695ivpzja2vh

The 58-minute continuation of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showFBI: 1,000 homegrown jihad terror investigations active in US, not counting Islamic State and al-Qaeda suspectshttps://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/fbi-1000-homegrown-jihad-terror-investigations-active-in-us-not-counting-islamic-state-and-al-qaeda-suspectsIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/4izwya7l2sos6kxm5vvg695ivpzja2vh

The 58-minute continuation of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showFBI: 1,000 homegrown jihad terror investigations active in US, not counting Islamic State and al-Qaeda suspectshttps://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/fbi-1000-homegrown-jihad-terror-investigations-active-in-us-not-counting-islamic-state-and-al-qaeda-suspectsIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/4izwya7l2sos6kxm5vvg695ivpzja2vh

The 58-minute continuation of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showFBI: 1,000 homegrown jihad terror investigations active in US, not counting Islamic State and al-Qaeda suspectshttps://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/fbi-1000-homegrown-jihad-terror-investigations-active-in-us-not-counting-islamic-state-and-al-qaeda-suspectsIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/4izwya7l2sos6kxm5vvg695ivpzja2vh

The 58-minute continuation of a 3-part Series. Kel Fritziof Canada Hosts Geoff Mitchell of the United Kingdomand myself on her program, 'Infadels Are Watching' to discuss islam, trans-nationalalism and other topics of global interest.Global Patriot Radio;https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radioRFB Radio Online Radio by Kel of RFB and IAW;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kel-fritziEnglish Defence League Radio Show Main page;http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-english-defence-league-showFBI: 1,000 homegrown jihad terror investigations active in US, not counting Islamic State and al-Qaeda suspectshttps://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/fbi-1000-homegrown-jihad-terror-investigations-active-in-us-not-counting-islamic-state-and-al-qaeda-suspectsIAW ~ Kel, Dave, and Geoff in Conversation (5/22/18);https://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio/2018/05/22/iaw-kel-dave-and-geoff-in-conversationFREE Show .MP3 Download available at;https://app.box.com/s/4izwya7l2sos6kxm5vvg695ivpzja2vh

There's plenty of talk on radio, but with 20twenty you'll find Life, Culture & Current events from a Biblical perspective. Interviews, stories and insight you definately won't hear in the mainstream media. This feed contains selected content from 20twenty, heard every weekday morning. See www.vision.org.au for more details Help Vision to keep 'Connecting Faith to Life': https://vision.org.au/donate See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Justice and Development Party (AKP) government, dominated by President Erdogan, has governed Turkey for more than a decade. Its initial democratisation agenda, however, has taken an authoritarian turn - with minimal tolerance for dissent. The lecture by Professor Umut Azak (Okan University, Istanbul) investigates the shifts in state-Islam relations within the context of a shrinking pluralist democracy in Turkey and the broader Middle East. The AKP’s state-led Islamisation and commitment towards creating a ‘devout generation’ are examined by locating the institutionalisation of ‘state Islam’ within the foundations established by the secular Kemalist Republic. More info: http://sydney.edu.au/sydney_ideas/lectures/2016/professor_umut_azak.shtml

Taslima Nasrin is a world-renowned author and secular activist from Bangladesh. A physician by training, she has written a plethora of novels, poems and papers standing for the rights of women and criticizing religious extremism. Nasrin’s brave and influential writings have angered both governments and Islamists, forcing her to leave her home country, and take up residence in several different countries, at one point settling in India until very recently.   Dr. Nasrin tells her story in this special episode of Point of Inquiry, recorded before a live audience at the Center for Inquiry’s Reason for Change conference. In conversation with Lindsay Beyerstein, she discusses her life as a skeptical child in Bangladesh, her perspective on the Islamisation of her home country, and her rise to the dangerous status of human rights hero and “enemy number one” of Islamic extremists.  To this day her writing still causes outrage in Islamic extremists, and she was recently named as a target for murder by the same Al Qaeda-linked Islamists who claimed responsibility for the deaths of other secular bloggers, including Avijit Roy. In response to this threat, the Center for Inquiry took action to bring her to safety in the United States. Even thought Nasrin has lost the home she knows and loves but the Bangladeshi government and Islamic regime will never be able to take away her pen. Nasrin continues to write for freedom and justice, offering a voice to millions who do not have one.

Germany's new anti-Islamisation movement, Pegida, is attracting a middle-aged, middle class following to its weekly marches around the country. The founder, Lutz Bachmann, has criminal convictions for burglary and assault. He rarely gives interviews to the media. However in this edition of The Report he talks to our reporter Catrin Nye. Producer: Smita Patel Researcher: James Melley.

Germany's nascent anti-Islamisation movement, Pegida, is attracting a new middle aged following to its weekly marches around the country. Catrin Nye meets its leader.

A few months ago, no-one had heard of Pegida but this week the German group, which stands for Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the West, mustered 25,000 supporters in the city of Dresden to march against immigration and the growing presence of Islam in Europe. Fiona Symon talks to Stefan Wagstyl about the origins and aims of the group. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

17,500 Germans Gather To Sing Christmas Carols Against Islamisation,NYC Cop Killer’s Undiscovered Social Media Accounts Show Islamic Side,It’s official: IRS employees biased against conservatives,Inside Isis: The first Western journalist ever to be given access to the 'Islamic State' has just returned – and this is what he discovered,Today in Cold War History,About the USS Pueblo,‘Everything Is Confidential’: Obama Stiffs Congress on Details of Cuban Spy Swap

There's plenty of talk on radio, but with 20twenty you'll find Life, Culture & Current events from a Biblical perspective. Interviews, stories and insight you definately won't hear in the mainstream media. This feed contains selected content from 20twenty, heard every weekday morning. See www.vision.org.au for more details Help Vision to keep 'Connecting Faith to Life': https://vision.org.au/donate See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Talking about people going to Mars and dying from vomiting and diarrhoea due to space radiation. Commenting upon the Islamisation of Turkey and the problems in the streets of Istanbul and also the problems on the streets of Stockholm in Sweden. Of course I have to have a little bit of a mention about the impending Samsung Galaxy S3 and looking for software.

The OIC's latest assault on free speech.