Podcasts about kymera

Audio roundup of selected biopharma industry content from Scrip over the business week ended 6 June 2025. In this episode: Sanofi's Blueprint buy; AstraZeneca's breast cancer resistance results at ASCO; BMS and BioNTech's big bispecific deal; Kymera's Dupixent in a pill; and Degron's CEO on pipeline and strategy. https://insights.citeline.com/scrip/podcasts/scrips-five-must-know-things/quick-listen-scrips-five-must-know-things-T5ID4HF465BXFGAH7C6OOSEGTA/ This episode was produced with the help of AI text-to-voice and voice emulation tools. Playlist: soundcloud.com/citelinesounds/sets/scrips-five-must-know-things

Good morning from Pharma and Biotech daily: the podcast that gives you only what's important to hear in Pharma and Biotech world. Roche and Jazz Pharmaceuticals presented data at ASCO showing that their drug combination improved survival in a phase III lung cancer trial, with analysts noting a strong treatment effect. Jazz has filed for FDA approval for the combination, which could provide an alternative to monotherapy treatments from Roche and AstraZeneca. Trump's tariffs could potentially endanger the rare disease space, according to industry experts. Other news includes Kymera's success with a protein degrader candidate, Amgen's IMDelltra boosting survival in small cell lung cancer, and concerns about the impact of FDA guidelines on nitrosamine testing. BioAgilytix will be at BIO International to discuss their drug production capabilities. Other news includes Kura's new data in acute myeloid leukemia, Keros' layoffs, Regeneron's investment in a Chinese obesity drug, and Sanofi's acquisition of Blueprint to expand their rare disease portfolio. Upcoming events include webinars on AI in life science R&D and the crisis facing the pharma industry. Job opportunities in clinical data management, regulatory affairs, and scientific roles are also highlighted.

The standard approach of “7 + 3” chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment has been in place for 50 years. But that may soon change, says Maximilian Stahl, MD, a member of the Adult Leukemia Group at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston and a member of the faculty at Harvard University. “My prediction is that in 10 years, you will not see much 7 + 3 anymore. Maybe not even 10 years, maybe five years,” he tells Robert A. Figlin, MD, the interim director and Steven Spielberg Family Chair in Hematology-Oncology at the Cedars-Sinai Cancer Center in Los Angeles. Dr. Stahl describes how targeted therapies such as menin inhibitor revumenib (Revuforj), which was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, are transforming AML care. Although currently indicated for relapsed/refractory disease, trials are exploring frontline use. “Pretty much, if you can think of any combination treatment in your head, that is already an ongoing clinical trial,” Dr. Stahl explains. He outlines how targeted therapies have already changed practice and looks to what advances are likely in the near future. Dr. Stahl reported a consulting or advisory role with the Boston Consulting Group, Clinical Care Options, Curis Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, Haymarket, Kymera, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. Dr. Figlin reported various financial relationships.

Good morning from Pharma and Biotech daily: the podcast that gives you only what's important to hear in Pharma e Biotech world. Steward Health is closing two Ohio hospitals and a Pennsylvania facility due to financial reasons, drawing criticism from healthcare workers and unions. McLaren Health Care in Michigan is facing disruptions from a ransomware attack, while Humana has settled whistleblower allegations of Medicare Part D fraud for $90 million. A judge has struck down an FTC ban on noncompete agreements nationwide, impacting the healthcare industry. Massachusetts has brokered agreements for Steward to sell five hospitals as part of bankruptcy proceedings. The healthcare industry is focusing on delivering patient-centric experiences and combating burnout. Recent articles cover topics such as medical tourism, health care fights, private equity deals, and reproductive freedom. As Bristol Myers' schizophrenia drug nears approval, AbbVie and other competitors are looking to enter the market with new antipsychotics to improve patient adherence. BridgeBio is sending rare disease drugs to a new company called GondolaBio, backed by $300 million from investors. Regeneron faces FDA delays for a myeloma drug due to manufacturing issues. Biomarin has reshuffled its executive team with new heads of R&D and business development. Lilly's tirzepatide has shown promising results in reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes progression. Drugmakers are strategizing for upcoming patent expirations by finding new products and markets. Edwards Lifesciences is continuing its mergers and acquisitions spree by acquiring Genesis MedTech's TAVR technology and investing $25 million in the company. In other news, Johnson & Johnson is buying heart failure implant maker V-Wave for up to $1.7 billion, while Medtronic asserts that its diabetes strategy remains unchanged despite a partnership with Abbott. The FDA defends Jeff Shuren's tenure amid ethics concerns, Dupont acquires Donatelle Plastics for $313 million, and a survey reveals that small biopharma and CROs are increasingly using multiple trial technologies. Steward Hospitals is closing two facilities in Ohio and one in Pennsylvania due to financial reasons. Dissatisfaction with electronic health records (EHR) is increasing nurses' burnout risk, with a third of nurses attributing their burnout symptoms to EHR issues. Updated COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna have been approved by the FDA to better match current virus strains. The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has received 12,000 complaints of noncompliance with surprise billing regulations and has won $1.7 million in restitution.The ongoing struggle for health equity in the pharmaceutical industry highlights disparities in cancer treatment access and outcomes. Efforts to improve outcomes for black cancer patients through increased screening rates have not been successful, with income disparity playing a significant role in cancer rates among different backgrounds. Various industry leaders and experts share insights on strategies to improve diversity in clinical trials, tackle health disparities, and promote health equity.This week in gene therapy news, Biomarin has reshuffled its C-suite with new executives from Amgen and Roche, while Avidity and Kymera have raised fresh funds. Zealand and Arrowhead are advancing obesity drugs, while Bluebird has narrowed its launch guidance. The rise of antibody-drug conjugates in cancer treatments is discussed along with upcoming events in the biopharma industry.For more updates on gene therapy, subscribe to Biopharma Dive's newsletter.

Good morning from Pharma and Biotech daily: the podcast that gives you only what's important to hear in Pharma and Biotech world. Biopharma news on August 21, 2024 saw changes in Biomarin's C-suite, with Greg Friberg and James Sabry taking over R&D and business development. BridgeBio launched GondolaBio for rare disease drug programs, while Regeneron faced FDA setbacks for a myeloma drug. Avidity and Kymera raised funds, Walgreens partnered with Barda, and Merck licensed an antibody drug conjugate. Thermo Fisher Scientific supported oncology research with new developments in clinical trials. Overall, the industry saw leadership changes, setbacks in drug approvals, fundraising activities, partnerships, and innovations in clinical trials.A study suggested that patients on Novo Nordisk's semaglutide may have a higher risk of suicidal thoughts. The FDA denied Regeneron's drug approval for myeloma due to manufacturing issues. Lawmakers raised concerns about US biopharma companies working with the Chinese military. Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and Sanofi are each focusing on different markets for their diabetes GLP-1 drugs. The impact of recent Supreme Court decisions on the healthcare and pharma industries is discussed, including challenges against regulations and reforms proposed by President Joe Biden. The uncertainty could jeopardize FDA authority and provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act, adding complexity for pharma companies.The Biosecure Act revealed gaps in domestic drug manufacturing readiness in the US. Different strategies of Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and Sanofi in developing and distributing their GLP-1 drugs were highlighted. A gene therapy patent ruling raised intellectual property concerns, Genentech closed its cancer immunology group, and layoffs were reported in the industry. House lawmakers expressed worries about US biopharma companies collaborating with the Chinese military on trials. Aadi Bioscience plans to lay off 80% of its R&D staff.

Good morning from Pharma and Biotech daily: the podcast that gives you only what's important to hear in Pharma and Biotech world.J&J has acquired heart failure implant maker V-Wave for up to $1.7 billion, while Medtronic reiterates its unchanged diabetes strategy despite a partnership with Abbott. Histosonics secured $102 million for a noninvasive tumor treatment using sound waves, and Edwards acquired Genesis' TAVR technology. The FDA approved NowDiagnostics' at-home syphilis test, offering results in 15 minutes with a drop of blood. The biotech industry remains strong in 2024, with startups thriving and technology advancements. Small biopharma and CROs are adopting multiple trial technologies, as per a recent survey.23andMe, known for consumer genetic testing, focuses on therapeutics development despite financial struggles and data breach lawsuits. Their lead candidate targets a new cancer treatment pathway using checkpoint inhibitors. Lilly's diabetes drug tirzepatide shows promise in reducing type 2 diabetes risk, while J&J's Rybrevant and Lazcluze combo is FDA-approved for lung cancer. Avidity and Kymera raised funds, Walgreens partnered with BARDA, and Merck licensed an antibody drug conjugate. Humana settles Medicare Part D fraud allegations, Steward hospitals in Massachusetts must sell five facilities, and McLaren Health Care faces another ransomware attack.Eli Lilly's tirzepatide demonstrates a 94% risk reduction for type 2 diabetes in overweight adults, and J&J's Rybrevant combo is the first chemo-free treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Walgreens and BARDA collaborate to boost decentralized clinical trials, while three drugs are projected to drive drug price negotiation savings in 2026. Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs roles are crucial for market access, AbbVie and Genmab expand Tepkinly's European label, and biopharma companies like Lykos, Galera, and Grail announce staff reductions. AstraZeneca receives FDA approval for Imfinzi's perioperative use.Lykos restructures with significant staff cuts post-FDA rejection of their therapy, Acelyrin shifts focus to thyroid eye disease treatment after layoffs. Biotech IPO sizes are increasing despite slow IPO rates, Lilly opens an R&D hub in Boston, Ovid and Lexicon downsize staff. Stay informed with Biopharma Dive's comprehensive coverage of biotech and pharma industry news.

Dad found Kuddly Kymera at a gaming convention. It was designed and published by Mythica Gaming. They are the same team behind one of our other favorite games, Dueling Dice! Kuddly Kymera is a game about creating the cutest animal possible. Players take turns playing down cards from their hand onto themselves or other players. My dad, sister, and I had a blast playing it so we introduced it to my grandparents on vacation, and they really enjoyed it.The true definition of chimera is spelled with a “C” and it is a “fire breathing monster with a lion's head, goat's body, and a serpent's tail. But luckily we are making cuter animals than that. Why they spelled them both with a “K” when they are truly spelled with a “C” I don't have a clue. Gather your friends and family to see who can create the cutest animal.Get your copy HERELocked Out by Bearded Board Games Coming to Kickstarter 8/13!

While DNA captures most of the fanfare, proteins are the catalytic and structural superstars of the cell. However, they can also become problematic. Cells have intricate mechanisms to remove damaged or mis-expressed proteins that could be deleterious to cellular function. This process is mediated by a process called ubiquitination, mediated by a special class of proteins called E3 ligases. Ubiquitin is the tag that's added that signals that a protein should be moved to the biochemical garbage can.  Dr. Juliet WIlliams of Kymera describes how their company has used modeling and A.I. to design molecular linkers that connect a protein that needs to be degraded with the machinery to tag it for destruction. The goal of this line of therapeutics is to target a suite of proteins that need to be degraded for normal health and development. Their pipeline contains multiple clinical and pre-clinical trials, and the approach is an exciting complement to other drug discovery methods. 

To stay up to date with new treatments and standards of care medical oncologists in the United States are required to take the ABIM Maintenance of Certification exam, a ten-hour test, every ten years. This ASCO education podcast focuses on the Longitudinal Knowledge Assessment. An alternative test that offers more flexibility in medical certification.     Our guests are Dr. Suresh Nair Physician-in-Chief of Lehigh Valley Cancer Institute in Allentown, Pennsylvania and Chair of the ABIM Medical Oncology Board and Dr. Olatoyosi Odenike, Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Chicago and member of the ABIM Medical Oncology Board.   Speaker Disclosures  Dr. Suresh Nair:   Research Funding - Bristol-Myers Squibb Recipient; Merck; Nektar Therapeutics; Mirati Therapeutics; Strata Oncology   Dr. Olatoyosi Odenike:   Consulting / Advisory Role – Abbvie; Impact Biomedicines; Celgene Recipient; Novartis; BMS; Taiho; CTI Biopharma; Threadwell therapeutics; Blueprint Medicines; SERVIER; Kymera; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene  Research Funding - Celgene; Incyte; Astex Pharmaceuticals; NS Pharma; Abbvie; Janssen Oncology; Oncothyrapy; Agios; AstraZeneca; CTI BioPharma Corp Recipient; Kartos; Aprea AB; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Daiichi Sankyo; Loxo; Novartis  Resources  To find out more about the ABIM LKA, go to https://www.abim.org/lka/  For a video walk-through, visit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0-qaUQmQXc  Sign in to the ABIM Physician Portal to sign up for LKA by June 30, 2023: https://portal.abim.org/   To find out more about how ASCO supports physicians engaged in ABIM MOC, go to https://old-prod.asco.org/meetings-education/continuing-education-moc  If you are interested in joining the ABIM Item Writing Task Force for Medical Oncology, find out more and submit your application at: https://www.abim.org/about/boards-and-committees/openings/medonc-iwtf-physician/  If you liked this episode, please follow the show. To explore other educational content, including courses, visit education.asco.org. Contact us at education@asco.org. TRANSCRIPT Disclosures for this podcast are listed in the podcast page.  Dr. Suresh Nair: The medical profession is one where new treatments and standards of care are being discovered and applied frequently, especially in oncology. Staying up to date with such practices allows the physician to provide the highest quality of care. How is this accomplished? By taking part in the Maintenance of Certification, or MOC. The traditional MOC assessment takes about 10 hours to complete and gives you ten years to be reported as certified before your next assessment is due. But given today's world where new treatments and standards of care are advancing rapidly, a more continuous assessment approach is warranted to help oncologists stay up to date.  This ASCO Education Podcast explores a new alternative to the every decade MOC exam for medical oncology. It's known as the Longitudinal Knowledge Assessment or LKA. I'm Suresh Nair MD, the Physician Chief of the Lehigh Valley Topper Cancer Institute in Allentown, Pennsylvania, and Chair of the American Board of Internal Medicine Medical Oncology Board. I will guide you through a general overview of the LKA, what it is, how it works, what the advantages are, and top-level need-to-know information. Joining me is my medical oncologist colleague, Dr. Olatoyosi Odenike, who's a professor of medicine and director of the Leukemia Program at the University of Chicago and serves as a fellow member of the ABIM Medical Oncology Board.  To begin, here are the essential differences between the ten-year maintenance of certification exam or MOC exam and the Longitudinal Knowledge Assessment, the LKA. Both are being used to help medical professionals maintain a working knowledge of the latest treatments and standards in use in their field. The MOC is administered every ten years at specified locations, lasts about 10 hours, and the results are available after two months. The LKA is another option. It has a five-year cycle during which you answer questions on an ongoing basis and receive regular feedback on how you're performing. Dr. Odenike has taken the LKA and the MOC.  Toyosi, please describe the preparation and the actual experience of taking the traditional MOC test. How much time did you take to prepare for the exam and how did you fit that prep time into your busy schedule? Dr. Olatoyosi Odenike: Thank you so much, Dr. Nair. For the traditional MOC, I started preparing about six months ahead of time and it was challenging to find time to prep and to fit that into an already busy schedule. It came down to blocking out any available time, particularly on the weekends, in the few weeks leading up to the actual examination date. It was also challenging to find time to dedicate a whole day to taking the exam and traveling down to the test site to do so. Dr. Suresh Nair: Today, the LKA is another option for busy oncologists. In 2022, the American Board of Internal Medicine launched the LKA after years of working with and listening to the physician community to understand their needs. As long as you're meeting the LKA participation requirement and other MOC requirements you'll continue to be publicly reported as certified for your entire five-year LKA cycle. The LKA is designed to provide greater flexibility, more convenience, and more immediate feedback, helping physicians stay current. Dr. Odenike, what has been your experience so far with the LKA? Dr. Olatoyosi Odenike: So far, I have found the process far easier to navigate than the MOC. Registering for the LKA on the ABIM physician portal was very easy. There are 30 questions per quarter, and I chose to get weekly reminders of the due date, along with a link to access the portal and the LKA questions. I find this to be so convenient, I can determine when to access and complete the questions, which I have often done on block closer to the due date. You are able to do this and fit this in your schedule any way you choose, which is a big improvement on the traditional MOC. Dr. Suresh Nair: Is the LKA a big time commitment for you? 30 questions per quarter seems like a lot. How does it compare to the traditional ten-year model?  Dr. Olatoyosi Odenike: There's a four-minute time limit per question. So technically, you can answer all 30 questions in one afternoon. Some physicians report doing this in two hours. Data gathered over the last year have shown that most participants answer questions in under two minutes. And how they approach it is unique to each person. Some set aside a little time each week to answer questions until they're finished. Others, like me, will do it all at once or over the course of one week near the end of the quarter. You could do one a day with your morning coffee if you wanted to. We have found the structure to be significantly more flexible than the traditional MOC.  We have a question for you, Dr. Nair. Can physicians sign up for the LKA now, even if they're not due for an assessment? Dr. Suresh Nair: You can only sign up in the year that you're due, or rather, starting in the December prior to your due year. So, physicians due for an assessment in 2023 were able to enroll starting December 1, 2022. Physicians who are recently certified or who are not due for a few more years have to wait until their due year to sign up for the LKA. Dr. Olatoyosi Odenike: What is the last date to sign up for the LKA? Dr. Suresh Nair: The last day to enroll in 2023 is June 30. If you missed the enrollment date for the LKA this year, you can still opt to take the MOC exam in the fall without letting your certification lapse. MOC registration closes August 15.   Dr. Olatoyosi Odenike: What happens if you don't pass after five years? Dr. Suresh Nair: If you don't pass after five years, you enter the grace period as long as you're meeting your other MOC requirements and will continue to be reported as certified during that time. You'll have one calendar year to pass the traditional MOC exam. In some ways, this is somewhat risk-free going with the LKA in that regard. Can physicians still take the MOC exam if they prefer to? Dr. Olatoyosi Odenike: The MOC exam is still available in spring and fall each year for most certificates, including med ONC and hematology, the LKA is just another option. Many physicians prefer to take the traditional exam or if they're certified in multiple specialties, they use both the exam and the LKA to balance their time and areas of expertise better. Some physicians take the LKA in hematology and/or medical oncology while using the exam to remain certified in internal medicine, for instance, or vice versa.  I have a question for you, Dr. Nair. Who is eligible to take the LKA? How can physicians know if they're eligible? Dr. Suresh Nair: LKA is offered in 15 specialty areas. All board-certified physicians in their assessment due year, except those in a grace period, are eligible. All physicians certified before 1990, all physicians with a lapsed certification. In fact, I had trained in both hematology and oncology 30 years ago, and I practiced medical oncology at two academic community hospital systems. I actually signed up for the LKA this past year to regain certification in hematology that had lapsed after my first 10 years, and I've had a great experience. I have finished a year of taking the test. I've gotten assessments. I see what my strong points and weak points are. I've actually ordered the ASH_SAP and I'm reading up on my weak points and I'm continuing this process. It really starts growing on you.  I'd like to thank Dr. Odenike for sharing your real-time experience in taking both the MOC and the LKA. I would like to extend an opportunity for all listeners interested in keeping their certifications through the LKA by going to the ABIM Physician portal www.abim.org. That's www.abim.org or go to the notes on the podcast page to access the link, as well as other resources. There you can keep track of assessment deadlines and progress, and it allows you to set reminders for assessments, points, and payments.  I want to thank all of you for listening to this ASCO Education Podcast. The ASCO Education Podcast is where we explore topics ranging from implementing new cancer treatments and improving patient care to oncology well-being and professional development. If you have an idea for a topic or guest you'd like to see on the show, please email us at education@asco.org. To stay up to date with the latest episodes and explore other educational content, please visit education.asco.org. Thank you.  The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions.   Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.      

Bienvenue sur ce quatrième Occultruc ! Dans cette nouvelle vidéo on va parler d'un objet que l'on connait tous et qui n'est plus associé à ce qui semble être son origine ! Je vous présente la baguette magique ! --------------------------- Les deux baguettes présentées sont faite maison. La baguette télécommande infrarouge est un modèle de la marque Kymera. --------------------------- Boutique Occulture en ligne : https://www.tostadora.fr/occulture Tous les liens utiles de la chaine : linktr.ee/occulture.ytbPour soutenir la chaine : https://www.youtube.com/c/Occulture/membership --------------------------- Sources :https://www.wikipedia.org http://www.objets-de-legende.fr/ http://psychanalyse-paris.com/ http://www.encyclopedie-anarchiste.org/ https://vertjean.wordpress.com/ Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

In this week's episode of the Red Pill Revolution Podcast, we GO DEEP. We touch on everything from King Charles appointing Prince Andrew; An El Paso Teacher fired for promoting the term MAP, UFOs being sited and tracked over Ukraine, a nursing home apologies for bringing in a stripper, and even the ancient Sumerian Race and their unbelievable technological advances. Subscribe and leave a 5-star review! ----more---- Our website https://redpillrevolution.co/    Protect your family and support the Red Pill Revolution Podcast with Affordable Life Insurance. This is attached to my license and not a third-party ad!   Go to https://agents.ethoslife.com/invite/3504a now!   Currently available in AZ, MI, MO, LA, NC, OH, IN, TN, WV Email austin@redpillrevolution.co if you would like to sign up in a different state   Leave a donation, sign up for our weekly podcast companion newsletter, and follow along with all things Red Pill Revolution by going to our website: https://redpillrevolution.co    ----more----   Full Transcription      Welcome to the revolution. Hello and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams and thank you so much for listening today. I appreciate it so so much. We have some very fun and interesting things to talk about today. Some things about the Royal family on the backs of queen Elizabeth's death last week, some things about. I don't know, strippers at old folks homes. And then we will also talk about a little bit about UFOs, a little bit of everything today. So you are in for it. It's gonna be a great show. Thank you so much for listening. The first thing I need you to do before we jump into it is just go ahead and hit that subscribe button for me. All right. Takes five seconds of your day. It means the world to me. That's all I need you to do right now is hit the five star review button and subscribe takes five seconds. Like I said, if you're on apple podcast, Spotify, leave a review. If you are watching this on YouTube, go ahead and hit that like button wherever you're at. I appreciate you so much. And again, welcome to the revolution. We are going to jump right into it. Here are the articles we're going to discuss a nursing home has apologized after hiring strippers for their residents. . And we will discuss that. We actually have a video today, which you guys are in for a treat for. Um, there's some very, very happy old folks in this old folks home. And when I decide to put myself in one, many, many years from now, I may just have to figure out which one this one was, because it looks like they're having a great time. Um, the next one is discussing that prince, or I'm sorry, not no longer prince king, Charles himself is now, uh, seemingly going to a point prince Andrew into a high level position. And if you don't know anything about prince Andrew, you will in just a few minutes, there's a couple articles that we'll discuss on that. We are also going to talk about the Pakistan, former prime minister getting caught red handed, uh, with some documents. Now, normally I don't really care about the Pakistani former prime minister at all. Uh, but this was a, a pretty interesting one. So, um, we'll find out why he got caught red handed, uh, basically, um,  yeah. Basically putting, uh, documents out there during a legal case that didn't even exist. So we'll discuss that. We will also talk about El Paso, firing a teacher for going and calling pedophiles maps to their students and trying to convince them to do the same. So again, we will discuss all of that in a few more things, including UFOs and China, potentially finding a nuclear fusion fuel with limitless energy from the moon. All right. So lots of interesting stuff, stick around. Thanks for listening. Hit that subscribe button. If you didn't already, I forgive you, but if you don't do it now, I may not. All right. I forgive you, but just hit it. I appreciate it. Sincerely. All right, let's get. Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoon fed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power. Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the revolution. All right. Let's jump into it. Episode number 44 of the red pill revolution podcast. And I appreciate you more than, you know, the very first article that we are going to jump into today is going to be a nursing home. Apologizing, not sure why after hiring strippers for their residents. So we have heard of drag shows for infants and children, but what we have not heard of yet is strippers for old folks homes. and this is probably my favorite new video. There's a hilarious video making its round of a stripper, basically shaking her boobs  and doing all sorts of things in front of these old, old men and women in their mass. It's quite quite hilarious. So we will watch that in just a. But I do find it interesting, right? The, the, uh, drag show for children is such a hot topic. It seems like there was literally never a drag show for children. Right. Because it's a sexualized show until very, very recently. Um, so, and, and there's probably a very obvious reason why there's absolutely no reason children should be involved in drag shows, you know, but maybe that's me being crazy thinking that we shouldn't sexualize. Toddlers and infants, but who knows? So let's go ahead and watch this video here. It is quite hilarious of this nursing home debacle  and then we'll talk about some of the comments that came up in this, and then we'll move on to some more serious topics. But I thought we, you know, we'll start this one off light today. and I'll kind of talk you through what we are seeing in a, uh, you know, PG 13 fashion here. Although it's not, it's not that wild, you know, you can find it. It's not that crazy, but pretty hilarious stuff. All right, let's go ahead and pull this article or this video up. It seems like it's in a different country, but it's, uh, basically. This young woman, she looks like some type of, I don't know, I don't know if she's Asian or something, but they're speaking a different language and she's literally shaking her butt in front of these old folks on these old folks sitting in their wheelchairs. And there is just this man who is so excited to be there with holding this woman's boobs in her hands, hand. this is comical comical. Now I don't know why this isn't a thing. I think there's a company here. I, I don't know why this is not a thing already. There should absolutely be an entire stripper company. Designed to go to old folks homes. I don't know why we're like thinking that shouldn't be a thing. I don't know why these people feel like the need to apologize for hiring a stripper. Um, the only thing they should be hire, or the only thing they should be apologizing for is not hiring enough strippers. Cuz there was only one there and there's plenty of people to go around. Uh, they should absolutely bring in more people. Um, so , I don't know why they, they feel the need to do this. Now let's look through some of the comments here. Somebody says. Flips sake. They're old. They aren't dead. Yeah, of course. Why wouldn't these people enjoy themselves? You're on your way out. You might as well have a good time. Um,  let's see what somebody else said. This is coming from Reddit, Reddit slash face Palm, and somebody said, are we face palming for the apology? The hiring is exemplary.  uh, the next comment says maybe next time, mail strippers for the ladies too. Maybe that's what they forgot and why they have apologized.  all right. I think that's enough on that topic, but I think it's awesome. 100%. I am absolutely behind the strippers at old folks homes, way, way more than I am behind the children going to drag shows. Right. We see all these like horrific videos of, of literal children going to drag shows and giving money to these men. And in 90% of the time at these drag shows, they are highly unhealthy. And, and must we say overweight, and even in some cases, a Dr. May call them obese, but majority of the time it's obese obese men who are shaking the, what they did not have given to them by God, in front of children, asking them for money for sexual acts in front of. It's like literally one of the most horrific things. And like I said earlier, we didn't see that literally a year ago. We didn't see it at all. There was no drag shows, you know, shaking of, uh, you know, butts in front of children that was found to be acceptable a year ago. It's literally so baffling to me how this even became a conversation that we need to have. Um, and everybody who attends these with their children should absolutely have CPS called in them. Although there's another conversation about whether CPS is literally just designed to traffic, children for profit. Um, I heard somewhere that each child that they actually take away from the children ends up being like a hundred thousand dollars or Mo like it, it might have even been like a million. Um, every time CPS takes a child away from their family, they make money off of it from the, the country, from the state, from the federal government or the state government. They're actually profiting from taking children from their parents. And, you know, we went through a whole, you know, the whole vaccination thing. We had to look at it. Luckily, we're in a state here where they have exemptions for children, surprisingly enough, for in the state that I'm in, but they do, they have exemptions. They even have philosophical exemptions for vaccination, but there has been several, several cases. I did a ton of research on it when we decided not to give our children, the COVID vaccine. Um, for many, many reasons, the first being, it's not a vaccine, um, it's mRNA gene therapy, which has never been done before, you know, do your own research on that and make your own decisions for your own children. Um, but with my children's history and everything else, we decided not to do it. So we had to go and actually physically research what could happen if the state decided to come after us for that and have come to find out we fall under exemptions. Really nice to be in the state. I would never move to a state where that's not the case because they've actually, I looked at all of the laws in our state and I looked at all of the previous legal proceedings in cases against parents for not vaccinating. And there was like nine cases in the last hundred years or 70 years when this became a law where they attempted to do so now luckily a majority of those cases, they did not win and the parents actually ended up winning the case. Um, but just tells you how far the state is willing to go to profit from stealing children from their parents. It's horrible. So, you know, do a little bit of research on that. And I, I think it's, again, worth an episode, almost diving into what CPS actually is, what majority they go after, because it's a lot of times it's directly affecting minority communities, disproportionate. Um, you know, but I digress. So let's go ahead and move on from our nursing home strippers and we'll move into  the Royals family situation this week, uh, queen Elizabeth died. If you were hiding under a rock this week, or you're listening from the future in a time machine. Now, listening back, this is, uh, Wednesday, September 14th, 2022, that this is episode is happening and the, uh, queen died last week after almost 70 years, Ofra allowing prince Charles to become king Charles. Now some of the controversy that's coming up from that is that king Charles now, uh, you know, is now looking to so, so king Charles is now going to appoint prince Andrew to step in for him first, if he is ill or out of the country. That's right. The same prince Andrew, it says who was a close friend of Jeffrey Epstein and used $12 million of tax based income. To settle a sexual assault case with Virginia guff, the same Virginia guff, who was at the Galea Maxwell trial testifying directly. Right. You know that one. So king Charles is going to appoint a literal pedophile to potentially step in from now. We'll actually look into what that means. Um, and, and what the actual title is that he'll be getting. Um, but we'll read some of the comments here. It says he was already a counselor to his mom, queen Elizabeth II. The Regency act of 1937, decides who can be counselors. Apparently there's not a clause that has to do with, you know, paying off children for doing illegal sexual acts on them, you know, and being part of international sex trafficking rings. Maybe that should be a clause. I don't know who am I, although if you go and read the Ashley Biden journal, uh you'll know that. Our royalty, our princes and princes, our presidents and their family are not also immune to these types of acts. Um, but it goes on to say that three of them are non working Royals. Um, you guys need new legislation, so prince Andrew or prince, and can replace Peto prince. Now princess Anne is a, uh, somebody who goes on and say for real princess, Anne is a G does a lot of low profile Royal's work, charity work, zero scandals, not a big spender. Um, I could be propaganda by the news, but she seems humble and hardworking. I think she may have even been the one who was, uh, allowed to stand beside the princess, um, in one of these proceedings for like one of the very first times. Um, but quite interesting. Uh, don't really know why a king of a nation. Potentially put a pedophile in the possession of power, but you know, once you find out that maybe potentially majority of them are culprits in this type of thing, uh, you know, it starts to be much more believable. Now this article goes on to say that king Charles II appoints prince Andrew in new important role. And another article says that prince Andrew can still be deputized for king as counselor of state, but princess Anne can't under new rules. And then, um, we'll go ahead and jump into one of those articles here. So it goes on to say that king, uh, king Charles I third ascended the throne after his late mother queen Elizabeth, the second passed away at her country estate in bald morale Scotland. The 73 year old was officially announced as the nation's new sovereign last Saturday, September 10th. And following his proclamation, the new head of state was supposedly appointed his younger brother, prince Andrew as counselor of state. Robert Peston journalist and political editor for ITV news, posted a thread of tweets explaining the situation. And he says the Monarch points, five counselors of state to stand in for him when he is unwell or out of the UK, Peston began, they are his spouse. Plus the top four in secession to the crown who are age 21 or over these include prince Andrew and his daughter, princess Beatrice. It says that, uh, but not prince and who is probably the most widely respected in all of the Royal family. Many would say, this is not, especially since the 2013 secession of the crown act ended Premo, gen premature. Not sure what that is though. Um, only for those born after 2011, uh, interesting. He says it continues that. So if king Charles were incapacitated, Andrew would step in as king. Not Anne. He ended his thread with the question. Do you think most British people would approve? I would certainly hope not says taken to Twitter. Many users shared their answers to passions questions. One responded, I most certainly would become a Republican under those circumstances. No way would I accept Andrew as a standin for the king? This is nuts. A second person wrote in his first week as king Charles has had two hissy fits about pens, sacked dozens of his staff at Clarence house. And now is rehabilitating prince nons. Good call is your majesty. Yeah, I saw him do that, where he was like sitting there signing documents and like pissed that there was some stuff on the table and like waved in somebody else because how dare he have to move the King's hand to move a, you know, pen off of a desk. Um, it goes on to say that a third waited or wants to wait for an outcome tweeting. Let's see what the actual outcome is. I don't think people will stomach Andrew being in that line. I'm pro monarchy. I may be, it may be a legal glitch or point of clarification may be needed, but certainly needs to be changed. Andrew had also, uh, previously served as this Queen's counselor of state, along with king Charles Prince William and prince Harry. Hmm. Um, so who better to take on the throne  than a potential Jeffrey Epstein associated pedophile literally paid off Virginia guff in a settlement claim during, uh, a legal proceeding to hush hush, the conversation surrounding him sexually assaulting a minor. Hmm. Now that could lead us into our next conversation, which, you know, would be a little bit deeper than that, about this, you know, whole map situation, which we'll get into here in a minute. Um, but let's see if there's any more substance to these articles. I don't know anything about this princess Anne. Um, but it sounds like, you know, maybe she's the one who a lot of people are rooting for, or that other person said maybe I'm being propaganda. You know, I like that word propaganda  that seems like it's a, a very fitting word in these types of situations. Um, but how terrifying is that? That literally not only the king of England, but you know, seeing over Canada, seeing over Australia, seeing over, you know, 14 different Commonwealth, uh, realms is what they referred to it as, um, would potentially be prince Andrew also known as PTO Andrew, because as we've stated, he's a pedophile. I don't know. Quite terrifying. What a horrific PR move by, you know, during all of this. Now I did see something about king Charles. I, I just can't say that seriously, king Charles, I feel like I'm in a Disney movie. It seems so bizarre that we have Kings and Queens and princesses and, you know, Royal family, you know, all based on blood lines. That's the, that's the weird thing about the Royal family is it's literally all based on bloodline. You cannot move your way into a position of power. It's literally a Royal bloodline. And we talked about this an episode ago, where if you go back far enough, according to these, you know, conspiracy theories, you know, even people like Cleopatra. And, uh, there's like basically 12 Royal families that have had these bloodlines go down and down for generations. There's a CIA document about it, which is quite quite interesting. Um, so I'll have to check that out at some point there's like a 217 page book that is, uh, put into the cia.gov. Documents, you can go to Google right now, or even better go to brave search right now and type in CIA Royal bloodlines, FOA, OIA, freedom of information act. And you will find the document that I'm discussing here. Anyways, do some research on that. Happy to discuss it with you All right. Let's move on. Dr. Fauci and ran Paul and here is the clip, uh, but she's had the flu for 14 days. Should she get a flu shot? Well, no. If she got the flu for 14 days, she's as protected as anybody can be. Cuz the best vaccination is to get infected. And if not, if she really has the flu, if she really has the flu. Now, what this is, is this is ran Paul grilling, Dr. Fauci very recently regarding this, like today, I believe it's today. He's showing him on an iPad, the, to his own statements from like a few years ago, saying these things about the flu. Okay. So take that into consideration. When you're listening to this vaccination is to get infected yourself and, uh, but she's had the flu for 14 days. Should she get a flu shot? Well, no. If she got the flu for 14 days, she's just protected as anybody can be. Cuz the best vaccination is to get infected yourself and not get it. If she really has the flu, if she really has the flu, she definitely doesn't need a flu vaccine. If she really has the flu, she should not get it again. No, she doesn't need it because the, it it's the BA it's the most potent vaccination is getting infected yourself. So when we look at this, we wonder, you know, why you seem to really embrace basic immunology back in 2004 and how you, or why you seem to reject it now. And as a matter of fact, Reuter's fact check looked at that and said, Fauci, 2004 comments do not contradict his pandemic shame, actually words don't lie. If you look at the words behind me, we can go over them a little bit at a time. She doesn't need it because the most potent vaccin vaccination is getting infected yourself. It is true. It is true Senator. It is a very potent. Way to protect. But when you're trying to tell us that kids need a third or a fourth vaccine, are you including the variability or the variable of previous infection in the studies? No, you're not. So what I love about that is the fact that Dr. Fauci is just shaking in this piece of paper in his hand, coming from Reuters, like Dr. Fauci, aren't you Mr. Science, aren't you the only person who knows about science in this whole world, didn't you claim to be the, what did they say? If you question Dr. Fauci, you question science itself, like aren't you, the guy, not Reuters, not some random journalist who decided to, you know, try and make the world believe that there three year old needs another vaccination to be safe from a, a thing that literally doesn't even exist today. That, that the CDC itself said, you don't even need the quarantine, even if you have it. Right. But you're sitting there trying to justify it. And not only trying to justify it like Dr. Fauci, do you know that this is not. Facebook jail court. This is literally Senate. This is a Senate hearing, not the hearing on Facebook's fact checking. Right. He literally brought the fact that he brought that piece of paper with him to shake in front of the court. The fact that he did that and said, well, Reuters actually says a journalist with no experience in this says that you are wrong. Like you, you said it with your own words. How can you sit here in front of us and say that Reuters is going to like, um, you know, actually Reuters said that what I meant there is different from what I actually said, no, justify your position. Maybe, maybe you should back it up, not utilize Reuters in a fact checker. Like that's how far off we've gotten. That's how 1984 Orwellian we've gotten is now that somebody's going to sit in front of the Senate and utilize a journalist. Article to try and justify their own statements. So they don't have to back it up. And they're gonna use these like abusive, uh, tactics done by these journalistic companies like Reuters to, to try and Gaslight you into thinking that, oh, I, you know, Reuters knows what I meant, not, not myself. So I'll let them explain it. You know, it's like, no, literally you used your own words there. Like it it's, it's so crazy to see that he went on to, to use Reuters of all things to justify, not even backing it up himself. Like he's literally a, according to him, a scientist. And he can't even justify his own position on a statement that he made of with his own words, saying that you do not need a booster. You don't need a vaccine if you got it, because that's the best protection that you can get is actually getting it right. And not taking that into consideration when you are actually deciding to give children experimental drugs. Right. It's it's so, so wild to see that. But I love the fact that Fauci was shaking on camera. I love that. It makes me feel so warm inside just to know that he was so uncomfortable that his body could not even handle it there. And, and then the  other thing that I want to talk about, and, and I'll talk, touch on this just super, super briefly is that there was a clip going around of. Of an employee from Chick-fil-A employee, a Chick-fil-A employee took down this guy that was committing, like trying to steal the keys of this woman who had this children in her car. If you haven't seen it yet, it's gonna start making its rounds over the next few days. It's it's a Chick-fil-A employee who just jumped at this guy, like completely when he tried to like steal this woman's car with her baby in it, and just like threw him to the ground, stood on top of him and just, you know, my pleasure to him. could you just imagine him whispering that in his ear as he took them to the ground? Just amazing. Unbelievable. Um, but you know, I digress now, the very next. Is going to be Pakistan's former prime minister, Noah Sharif's family have produced documents to prove innocence concerning ownership of properties in London. The documents were signed in 2006, but the Kalibri font used in the document was released in 2007. So basically, uh, the document was dated 2006. And the font that was used in a document was 2007. So it completely showed that he fabricated this document. So we'll get a little bit more context here and then we'll talk about it. Um, it goes on, uh, to say that in July, 2018, um, three members of the family were fined and sentenced to jail Nawaz for 10 years, Miriam for seven. And her husband captains Dar for one year in the event, field department's case, as they could not show that the posh London property had been bought legitimately while Nawaz was sentenced for owning assets beyond income, the other two were held guilty for AB Bement and not cooperating with the prob agency. It was in this case that Miriam had presented a trust deed dated February, 2006 in Microsoft's Calibri font, which became commercially available only in 2007 Noah and his kin were jailed, but in September of 2018, the Islam bad high court ordered their release in suspended their sentence pending final adjudication for the, um, of the appeals against it. Hmm. So there is your. Breakdown  of why we are even discussing a former prime minister of Pakistan. Now, a few of the comments that you'll find on this thread here are a little funny that somebody says, that's why I always stick with times new Roman. Yeah. Just in case you find yourself in a court settlement and you don't want to have to deal with a, you know, great lawyer finding out that the font that you used pre or postdated the document that you signed  or forged even better. Um, . Um, pretty, pretty wild. You know, what, what, what hot water you must find yourself in there to legitimately use font. Like how stupid would you feel right to know that you made that big of a mistake, right. And how easy is it to just, just use time, new Roman, you don't have to get fancy here, guys. We don't need your Colibri. We don't need your comic Sams. We don't need any of that times. New Roman all the way across, you're safe from lawyers coming after you for utilizing the wrong font.  all right. So I found that to be interesting. And let's see if there's anything else of note in here. Um, so somebody says, so that's what good lawyers are for. Yes. That is exactly what good lawyers are for finding out that the person used the wrong. Interesting. All right. Anyways, I won't stick around on that one. I just found that to be quite, quite interesting now on the backs of the prince Charles or king Charles situation, let's go ahead and discuss this. There was an Al Paso teacher who was fired over, telling their students to use maps instead of the word pedophile. Um, for a comment in the classroom that touches off a firestorm says Fox news. We'll go ahead and we'll actually listen to this here. Uh, but we'll listen to where she actually says that to him. And this article even goes as far as showing, um, what the husband commented on a thread in a local Facebook group, which I found to be interesting too. So here is the article. It says Al Paso teachers firing over pedophiles comment in classroom launches, a firestorm response. It goes on to say that El Paso's independent school district board of trustees said the allegation is being investigated thoroughly. An El Paso teacher in Texas was informed of her proposed termination after telling students to call pedophiles, minor attracted persons, according to the city's school district. But some witnesses say her remarks were taken out of context. Now she literally says you shouldn't call them pedophiles. It's O you, we shouldn't make fun of them just because they wanna have sex with a five year old. She literally says to a high school student it's wild. It goes on to say that in an 18, second clip shared on TikTok, the Franklin high school teacher identified as the El Paso teachers Associa, uh, by the El Paso teachers association as Amber Parker, she'll never have a job again, um, can be heard telling students that they're not allowed to label individuals as pedophiles. She reportedly made the comment during a lesson on the play, the crucible. We're not gonna call them. That Parker said in the video, we're gonna call them maps, minor attracted persons. So don't judge people just because they want to have sex with a five-year-old. She says, what in the world kind of world are we coming to? We'll listen to the video in just a second, but it says first came the suspension. Then El Paso's independent school district board of trustees unanimously voted to fire Parker following her remarks on the evening of August 29th, 2022, the El Paso independent school district was made aware of a classroom situation. Impromptly initiated an investigation. Um, after a thorough investigation was conducted on September 6th, 2022, during a special board meeting, the board of trustees approved a decision to notify a Franklin high school teacher of proposed termination. The process will continue in accordance with the Texas education code, any allegation and potential misconduct is investigated thoroughly. And the safety of our students is the top priority as this is a personal matter, no further information will be shared at this time. So it goes on to talk about, um, some students were saying that it was taken out of context and then it gives what her husband actually said. Um, but let's go ahead and listen to this clip. It's again, it's 18 seconds long. And we'll see what this teacher had to say about maps. What? Stop it, Diego. Yeah. We're not gonna call them that. We're gonna call them maps. No mono attracted persons. No. So don't judge people just cuz they wanna have sex with a five year old. Oh, call . That was the perfect cut. You hear the guy go? What the fuck?  that's wild now. Thank the Lord that we're seeing retribution in this case. This is exactly what needs to happen across the board. And thankfully it didn't have to come to school board meetings in this, in this situation. Right? A lot of these situations have come to school board meetings, right? The sex books in children's libraries. Right. We've seen many, many videos about, uh, parents going in speaking up against those videos. Um, there's some crazy, crazy books that they're putting in children's libraries talking literally about sodomy and about sexual positions to five and six year olds in elementary schools. It's horrific, but thankfully, thankfully it didn't have to come to this case, at least as far as I know, it seems as if this school board caught it right away and, you know, surprised surprise they did it in Texas now. Um, I don't see how any of that could have been taken out of context. You can't say, you know, so don't judge people just because they won't to Hey of six, we had the five year old. Yeah, I'm gonna judge you. I'm gonna judge you and I'm gonna do way worse than that to you. If it's somebody that I know I'm gonna do far, far more to you than judge you. Yeah, dude, I'm not even gonna get into it cause that's called implication, but horrific, horrific thing to say, and to say it to an entire class of children to say it to an entire group in a high school setting, what kind of precedent is that setting? You're literally talking to minors saying it's okay. It, it, it's not only okay, but don't even judge those people for doing that to a child for literally putting the child in a position where they're going to be hurt worse than anything you could possibly imagine giving so much trauma for the rest of their lives that they're gonna have to deal with and unpack in a way that somebody who didn't deal with that could never have to imagine, could never have to imagine. And she's sitting in front of an entire school or an entire class of children saying that this should be acceptable and they shouldn't be judged. Not only that, but we're not even gonna use this term in case we hurt their little pedophile feelings. Like what in the world now, um, it goes on to say that the school district board of trustees voted to fire Parker following her remarks on the evening, uh, the El Paso school district was made aware of a classroom situation and promptly initiated an investigation. This is coming from the district's chief communications officer who told Fox news digital after a thorough investigation was conducted on Jan, uh, on September 6th, during a special board meeting, the board of trustees approved a decision to notify the teacher of proposed proposed to termination. The process will continue in accordance with the Texas education code, any allegation and potential misconduct. We already talked about that. Moving on, some students went on to say that her words were taken out of context. The teacher was expressing. This says how it was ridiculous, how they, how we might not be able to call people pedophiles that we will probably have to start calling them maps because is offensive to them. The class agreed. That's not what it sounded like now, if that is what it is, maybe you shouldn't be saying that in a group of high school students. Um, but if you are being sarcastic and then following that clip by saying, yeah, this is disgusting. This is gross. What they're doing, you know, we're absolutely going to call these people pedophiles and we're not gonna give into the woke ideology that is saying that we have to change the terms that we're using to describe the literal worst people in the world, doing the worst act in the world with the proper term for doing so and fear of you hurting their feelings, if that is the case. And she was being sarcastic. Yeah. It's definitely a distasteful joke. Should she lose her job for a distasteful, sarcastic remark? No, but if she is sitting here in front of a class of high school students protecting pedophiles and telling minors that they should also do the same, right? Literally the people that pedophiles go after minors in this case, um, Now it says that Daniel call vice president of El Paso independent school district board noted that while the lesson plans are approved by administrators, Parker appeared to stray from it in the particular class call had previously offered Parker. The benefit of the doubt saying the video had appeared to omit some important context and that it seemed Parker was only pretending to advocate the position. Now it did seem like she had some tonality there that seemed a little sarcastic, but I'm not gonna be the one to protect her update on my last post, after hearing from some of the students that were in the class, including my own nephew, I believe now that the teacher had appeared to be promoting and normalizing pedophilia was pretend, uh, I believe now that the teacher that appeared to be promoting in normalizing pedophilia was pretending to advocate a position. She didn't actually believe in, in order to challenge the students in preparation for them reading the play, the cruc. The video that many of us saw was missing. The important context. I regret the negative attention that the situation is brought to the teacher and wish her well. I'm told she is a great educator, but he ultimately voted in favor of firing her saying any reasonable person that heard what the seven trustees heard would've voted to terminate Amber Parker. Now Parker's husband. Jason said that Parker's comments were made to challenge students. Mr. Daniel call. I happen. The sick, the sick, what Mr. Daniel call, I happened to be the husband of the teacher in question Parker road on Facebook, I can tell you that we were shaken to our core about these accusations. It is both scary and disturbing that ANED 18. Second clip could destroy a 30 year career when taking completely out of context, she ex is exemplary as a teacher and truly cares about the students. Needless to say, we have spent many sleepless nights because of this cruel release to social media of the 18 seconds. We pray that you and the rest of the board will see this for what it is and not allow the edited video to destroy an innocent woman, her career, and her family in the process. I want to thank you personally for the updated post to begin to write this wrong. So it says that controversial classroom moments have been captured across the country. In recent years, driving parents to school, board meetings, demanding more of a say in their children's education. Um, Let's look at some of the comments here that says, this is a big problem with society, anything, and everything can be manipulated, um, input online or in the media to be the opposite of the actual facts. And once it is out, any correction, um, or apologies are buried and people are left with false impressions of circumstances. Uh, it also says that, um, want to know what's wrong with education today. After speaking with students and witnesses, I have come to believe that the teacher was being satirical and not expressing a view she held, but rather the opposite. I hear she is a great teacher, da, da, um, okay. That doesn't give us much information at all. Um, so it also says, so it is illegal to help a map with a cellulose nitrate and nitroglycerin assisted copper CLA PB projectile traveling at two times the speed of sound striking them with the frontal bone exiting the exci the bone, or is that still murder? Oh, I think that's called a gun.  um, interesting. All right. Anyways, so. This is, this is, this is, you know, good that these headlines are starting to lead in this direction. Right? Good. That we're starting to see pushback from not only the parents going to parent meetings, but also the school boards going in realizing the pushback that they're gonna have in these situations. Now, if this is a case where that teacher was being sarcastic, poor taste, poor timing, let's not even talk to children about the idea of normalizing pedophilia in the classroom. Obviously, you know, not the right way to go about that. Um, but should she be fired for having a sarcastic remark talking about maps? Eh, I don't know. But if she's saying that, you know, the, the sentence alone, maybe you shouldn't be talking about, you know, what did she say? So don't judge people just because they want to have sex for a five year old or with a five year old. Yeah. That's not funny. That's not a joke. That's not sarcasm. That's not that's wrong time and place. If you wanna do that at a bar and played devil's advocate on an argument, you know, you deserve to get ripped apart by whoever you're doing that with. Maybe you don't need to lose your job over it being sarcastic on that note. But in this case, don't talk to children about not judging people who wanna have sex with a five year old. Right. Anyways, now, Again, I think it's a positive thing that this is coming up. I think it's a positive thing that the school board is pushing back immediately. Not waiting for parents to come to school, board meetings, calling an emergency meeting over this because this got millions and millions and millions of views. Um, but anyways, let's go ahead and move on. But before I do that, I need you to do one thing for me. And what I need you to do is if you didn't hit that subscribe button just tipity tap it. There's not very many things you can do in your day to get good karma. It's gonna come back around. I promise you, your day's gonna get better. You're gonna feel just lighter when you move around, you know, when you're going to work, you're on your way to work. Your day's just gonna work out better if you just hit that subscribe button. All right. If you're already subscribed, I appreciate you. So. Hit that five star review button. All right, leave a nice review. Write something in the comment section, whatever it is, write a five star review. Even if it's just five words helps me get up in the rankings, helps more people get the message out on these certain topics and get a normalized view on some of the craziness that is happening in the world. This is not Fox news. This is not CNN. This is just a guy standing here, ball sitting here, um, drinking a little bit of whiskey and talking to you about my opinions. So leave a five star review. Um, again, I appreciate your head over to the website. Red pill, revolution dot C o.com is for losers head over there. Right now you can sign up for subst, which gives you all of the articles, um, all of the videos. And, uh, if you don't see it, check your spam folder. All. Um, anyways, go ahead and head over there right now you can sign up for the subst stack. You'll get all of the articles free to your inbox. You'll get the full video episode, full audio podcast directly in your inbox every single week, every single episode, and the, uh, next episode we're getting, or the one after that is going to be another interview. And I'm really excited about it. So make sure you stick around for that. Go head over there right now. Red pill, revolution.co, and lastly, but not loosely  you are going to die. I'm sorry to be the one to tell you. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you, but you're gonna die. And when you die, anything that you owe, including your home, your credit card. Your car payments, all of that taxes, all of that's going to be left to your spouse, all of that debt. Then if it's not your spouse, it's your grandchildren. And if it's not your grandchildren, it's your children. And if it's not your children, it might be some random guy that you never met. That is just, you know, Somehow related to you that the government decides to go after. So what you need to do is you need life insurance. And if you don't have life insurance already, when I became a father, I am a father of three beautiful children. And when I became a father, it helped me to realize my mortality. I was never going to die before I had children. At least I never worried about it. Didn't affect me. Right.  because when I die, it's, it's, it's done. It's over. But now I have an extension of my being on this world. I will live on forever to Val hella I go. But when I go, I do not wanna be the one to leave my children with debt. I do not wanna leave my wife with debt, right? I want to leave them a legacy and you can do that by going to red pill, revolution.com, hitting the menu button at the top, left and signing up for some life insurance. You're not gonna get any phone calls. That's the biggest problem with the life insurance industry and the health insurance industry. If you ever dealt with it, it's a pain in the, as it's the worst thing in the world. Whenever you put your number in the. This isn't gonna happen. You can sign up directly online. You don't have to talk to me. You don't have to talk to anybody. All right. We're currently in nine states. If you're not in one of those states, go ahead and send me an email. I will literally get the license just to help you get life insurance. Okay. Send me an email. Austin red pill, revolution.co all would love to help you out. All right, let's move on. But again, head over there right now. Sign up, subscribe. Five star review, everything I just said. Go ahead and do it. I love ya. I love ya. All right, let's move on. The next article that we're gonna discuss here is going to be Ukraine's astronomers. Say that there are tons of UFOs over Kiev during the war with Russia, wild stuff. If you haven't heard about. This is an article from vice and it says Ukraine's airspace has been busy this year. That's the nature of war, but scientists in the country are looking to the skies and seeing something that they even didn't expect. Inordinate number of UFOs, according to a new pre-print paper published by Kiev's main as astronomical observation in coordination with the C's national academy of science. Say that three times fast. Uh, let's try it. Um, Kiev's main astronomical observation.  I said it wrong the first time. Astronomical observa, astronomical observatory in coordination, astronomical observatory in coordination with the country's national academic. Society of science. The paper does not specifically address the war, but in the United States, the Pentagon has long hinted, speculated and warned that some UFOs could be advanced technology from foreign military, specifically China and Russia, though. It hasn't been really given any evidence that this is actually the case. The Ukraine's paper is particularly notable because it is not showing that science has continued to, uh, to occur during this war, but also explains that there has been a lot, a lot of sightings. We see them everywhere. The researcher said we observe a significant number of objects whose nature is not clear. The paper is titled unidentified, aerial phenomenon, one observations and events come from observations made by NAS main astronomical observatory in Kiev, in a village south of Kiev called VIN. RKA. According to the papers authors, the observator took on the job of hunting for UFOs as an independent project because of the enthusiasm around the subject. Yeah. Interested. You got my interest. It goes on to say that it describes a specific type of UFO. The researchers call Phantoms. That is an object that is completely black body that does not emit and absorbs all of the radiation falling on it. The researchers also observed that the UFOs that seeing are so fast that it's even hard to take pictures of them. The eye does not fix phenomenon lasting less than one 10th of a second. The paper said it takes four tenths of a second to recognize an event. Ordinary photo and video recordings will also not even capture. The UAPs to detect UAPs. You need a to fine tune, the equipment, shutter speed frame rate, and dynamic range. Wow. So video cameras, recordings, photos, and even your eyes cannot see the UFOs that are flying across Kiev right now. And there's an astonishing number of them. It says wild. So the researchers did just that using two media monitoring stations in Kiev, in Veka, we have developed a special observation technique taking into account the high speeds of the observed objects. The paper said the exposure time was chosen so that the image of the object did not shift significantly. During ex exposure. The frame rate was chosen to take into account the speed of the object in the field of view of the camera in practice. The exposure time was less than one millisecond and the frame rate was no less than 50 Herz. Not sure what that means. Not a photographer. The scientist divided the phenomenon they observed with two into two different categories. Cosmics and PTO. We note that cosmics are luminous objects brighter than the background of the sky. We call these ships names of birds, swift Falcon, and Eagle. The paper said Phantoms are dark objects with contrast from several to about 50% says using camera stationed, roughly 75 miles apart allowed the scientist to make repeated observations of strange objects. Moving in the sky. The paper did not speculate on what the objects were. Merely noted the observations and mentioned the objects. Incredible speeds. They went on to say that flights of single group and squadrons of ships were detected. Moving at speeds from three to 15 degrees per second, Phantoms were observed in the troposphere at distances of up to 10 to 12 kilometers. We estimate their size from three to 12 meters and speeds up to 15 kilometers per second. Wow. 15 kilometers per second. If you break that down is something like, I don't know. It's like 1.8 to times, something like that. I don't know. So it's basically like nine miles per second. That math is probably terribly off. And I'm so sorry if you're somebody who goes by the metric system, I am not. So just trying to help you guys out  it says the easy explanation would be that these are missiles or rockets or something else associated with the war. But the scientists insist that their nature is not clear. UFOs are back in the public conscious. After a string of sightings were caught on camera by Navy pilots. Congress has demanded answers and the Pentagon responded by saying this is seen, that has seen some strange stuff, but needed more time and money of course, to, because they don't have enough money to send to Ukraine and also look into potential, you know, UFOs entering our airspace with alien beings inside of them. At the same time  to study the phenomenon appropriately. Congress gave them both. And the Pentagon open to the a, a R O oh, the a a R O is that we talked about this about a week or two weeks ago where the Pentagon basically opened an entire subdivision section specifically to study this phenomenon of alien UFOs, not, not potentially, you know, China and Russia, uh, military aircraft, they already sub sectioned off the potential of that. Right. They said that we believe that some of these are not of human origin. They defy the laws of physics as we know them. Okay. Wild, wild stuff. And they're starting to come out and talk more about. All right. The article goes on to say, um, a recent addendum in the Senate intelligence budget report said that the thread of UFOs was increasing exponentially and that the Pentagon's new office needed to focus on the UFOs that aren't manmade. Yep, exactly what we just talked about and exactly what we talked about a few episodes ago. So go ahead and listen to that one. When you're done with this one, um, Boris, the lead researcher of the paper declined to comment. This says that there's an update from nine 13, which is yesterday says the original version of this article stated that the Kiev study was a joint venture with the Pentagon and NASA. It was not vice has corrected the story and regrets this era. Wow, good on you. Vice way to go way to go. Now, one thing that, you know, speaking of corrections, there's been a lot of articles recently talking about how IRA Mein was allegedly put in. I think it was the CDC or the who said that IRA Mein is now an allowable substance when it comes to COVID and has helped significantly. Now, um, the correction that was made was basically that they are still not recommending it. They still want to do trials. That was the big correction that a lot of people made. Um, but they're saying that it's potential. Hmm. Um, but there's been a few people like Russell brand came out and made like an apology statement. Um, Russell brand's the actor. Awesome dude. One of my favorite favorite podcasts. I've like tried to categorize myself as a podcast and I'm like, I don't want to technically be Tucker Carlson. I don't want to technically be a political podcast. I want to be more like there's one person I can put myself in a category with. That's like kind of a mixture of like libertarian politics, not left or right. Mainstream narratives also kind of conspiracy based with a touch and little bit of like globalism pushback  and some good humor. Hopefully you think so. Um, it's Russell brand Russell. Brand's got a great thing going, if you haven't listened to his podcast, go check it out. It's definitely, uh, a bit on the same genre and topics that we discuss here. Pretty interesting stuff. A mix of politics, current events, pop culture, and a little bit of conspiracy stuff. If you know what I mean. All right. Now, Um, pretty wild stuff. The, the, the UFO situation is just wild to me. You know, there's been so many conversations, so many articles, so many, you know, governmental institutions that are pouring money into this now that are saying, and making this conversation mainstream, you cannot ignore it at this point, right. Whether they're pushing an agenda or not, because for how long they've known this stuff's going on, right. From Roswell to, you know, literally, um, who's the guy that went on to Joe Rogan. Um, uh, gosh, I blanking on the name. Um, but there's been so many people that have come out and said that they were a part of this, uh, you know, from anything from seeing UFO Aircrafts, you know, how long have those sightings been going on? Uh, Jeremy Corbe was the guy I'm thinking of. Um, and he basically is one of the most, uh, mainstream people talking about this. He's had so many good conversations, really good, uh, footage that he's caught on it, um, breaks down these things very, very well. Um, so. If you haven't heard that go listen to the Jeremy Corbe podcast, uh, with Joe Rogan, it it's quite quite interesting. Um, and he even talks to somebody else who claims to have been a part of it at Roswell. So that's pretty wild too. Um, and that was with, uh, who, what is that other guy's name? Of course I'm like, just trying to think of names that of people I can't recall. Um, but it's pretty crazy. He like says that he basically went in and saw the UFOs, saw the, um, saw Bob Laar is a whole documentary on it. Bob Laars documentary by Jeremy Corbe and they go into how he was literally taken by. It was like the, um, by the military, by the CIA or whoever was conducting these operations. And because he was like in the newspaper for building rocketships  and so, um, he, they, he basically went into, um, area 51. And said that he saw the ships, he saw, literally believed that he said saw aliens. It was like years and years ago, but he said that he saw them, um, in, in, so there's, uh, all of these things that came out, like the chemicals that they, the chemical compounds that he talked about prior to the government even saying they existed. So there's all these really weird correlations and all of these things. And Bob Laar is a very interesting character. Um, he doesn't seem to want a ton of attention off of it. He seems to just be like, he, he legitimately seems to be telling the truth. Um, it's a very interesting conversation. Go look up that documentary too, giving you lots of homework assignments today. Sorry. um, so, um, then we'll go ahead and talk about this in just a moment, which is the, the China situation with moon chemicals or. Nuclear fusion stuff. But one thing I did wanna show is that, you know, apparently Dr. Fauci, Dr. Fauci, Mr. Science himself is getting still grilled by Ram Paul, which I love. And you'll see in this clip, he's literally shaking due to this conversation. So let's go ahead and watch this Ram Paul article take a little bit of a shift from the alien stuff, um, which would kind of have been a nice segue into China going to the moon and finding this, but let's, let's, let's stop that segue. And let's go ahead and look at this. Yeah, actually, you know what, let's talk about it. if you have not heard China discovered a stunning crystal on the moon, which they believe could give us unlimited energy of nuclear fusion fuel. Now this article is by vice and it says that the find makes China the third country to discovery a new mineral on the moon. And the country says it's analyzed the soil for rail rare helium three. Interesting. It says that China has discovered a crystal from the moon made of a previously unknown mineral while also confirming that the lunar surface contains a key ingredient for nuclear FIS vision, a potential form of effective or effectively limitless power that harnesses the same forces that fuel the sun and other stars. The crystal was a part of a batch of lunar samples collected by China's change five mission, which landed on the moon in 2020 loaded up with about four pounds of rocks and delivered them to earth days later, each carefully sifting through the samples, which are now the first moon rocks returned to earth since 1976. If you believe that scientists at the Beijing research Institute of uranium, geology spotted a single crystal particle with a diameter smaller than the width of a human hair, the crystal is made of a novel mineral Chan change site. Named after the Chinese moon goddess change or changey, I don't know how you pronounce that. There's a hyphen between C H a N G and then the hyphen, and then E it also inspired China's series of lunar missions. It is confirmed that as a new mineral on Friday by the commission of new minerals, it's a weird commission, um, nomenclature in classification, which is, uh, brought down to C N M N C  of international mur neurological association. According to the Chinese state run publication. Global times change site is the sixth new mineral to be identified in moon samples. And the first to be discovered by China before China, only the us in Russia could claim to have discovered a moon, moon mineral. It is a transparent crystal that formed in a region of these Northern lunar nor near face. That is volcanically active about 1.2 billion years ago. Um, let's see what this article continues to say, which is according to the state media, the new lunar samples also contain helium three, a new version of the element helium that has long fascinated scientists and science fiction creators because of its potential as a nuclear FIS vision fuel source, the hypothetical form of power aims to harness energy released by atoms that merge under tremendous pressure, such as those in the interior of stars. Starlight is a ubiquitous product of nuclear fusion, but human made fusion reactors will still likely take decades to develop assuming that they are fusible at all that sad. If these reactors do become a reality, helium three would be a good fuel candidate because it produces less radioactive byproducts and nuclear waste compared to other atoms. Whereas helium three is incredibly scarce on earth. It is abundant on the moon, a disparity that has stoked dreams of mining the minerals on the lunar surface. Along those lines, China has joined the United States and other nations and expressing interest in extracting resources from the moon. In the future. Very, very interesting. Now, a couple article titles that I'll go through here, and I'm not gonna dive deep into these articles, but I just want you to know them. It says that China is planning to turn the moon into a giant space shield sounds like some star war shit. Um,  uh, and another one is also, um, space junk, crashing all over the world, upsetting everyone. You know, I, I'm not that upset about space junk. Haven't heard about it much other than the fact that it's an unbelievable amount of space junk surrounding our earth. If you haven't heard about that, there's literally, there's a, I'm pretty sure there's a, a map that you can look at of the earth. And it shows all of the space junk, which is like little things that we've sent up in pieces of, uh, satellites and things like that. Like when they're done with a satellite, they're done using it, all of the satellites we've ever put up there, they just leave them there. Even if they break down, even if there's things that go on with them, um, pretty, pretty wild stuff. Like they almost be like the, when they go to plan a mission. To go into space. Oh, allegedly. Um,  when they go to plan the mission, they do math calculations because they track all of the space junk and try to figure out. How, what timing of day based on the trajectory, the speed of the, uh, the speed of the rocket or whatever, um, to try and make it. So it does not hit space junk because even if it hits a marble size of space, junk going 35,000 million miles an hour, however fast they go, it's going to destroy, destroy the, um, destroy the ship. So they have to calculate it based on the timing. And there's so, so much junk in space, um, that it's very difficult for them to time. Um, another article here from this is from a little while ago, it says Mars formation that looks like alien doorway spotted by NASA Rover. How do we not hear about this stuff? There's so much wild things going on in the world today that it's. I, I am so under the idea  this is a simulation, the simulation theory is so interesting to me because what is the likelihood there was like literally horse and buggies, like a hundred years ago, right? 1922 people were literally riding horses almost. And now just so it happens to be the timing that we're alive, that we get to see the most interesting technological booms ever. Right. You wanna go back and talk, you know, and it's like a hundred years ago is literally your great grandparents. Your great grandparents were alive a hundred years ago for sure. A hundred years ago, right? Maybe, maybe not maybe your great-great grandparents, but maybe your great grandparents, depending on how old you are. Um, and maybe your parents even right. A hundred years is not that long ago. Right. And 500 years is not that long ago, either 500 years ago is literally your great, great, great, great, great grandparents. That means five people had sex and now you're here  and all of a sudden we went from all living like the Amish or the Indians. And all of the sudden, since the 15 hundreds, we are looking at space formations, nuclear, fission rocks, talking about aliens, visiting us. I'm literally speaking to you through a plastic piece of, uh, you know, bullshit that nobody know how knows exactly how it works. You know, it's like, it's so wild that we live here today in this reality on this timeline that it just seems so unprobable to me, I just don't get it. There's, there's literally no way.  the likelihood that I am not a Amish person on a farm, you know, 1500, you know, and even the fact of like 2000 years ago,  being that far again, that's not that far. That's literally not that far. Not that far. Right? 25, 30, 30 sexes ago.  that's gonna be the way that I, I, I think of time now is how many people had to have sex between now and then for you to be in that era 30 sexes ago, you could have been living in a. The same time as Jesus. And now they want to tell us that like, you know, literally the worth was the earth was, you know, however many, you know, years old. It's like, nah, I don't believe ya. I don't believe ya. I don't think so. There was an article that came out there was like 30,000. Um, they found the body that, you know, was kind of disputing all science on humanities, you know, uh, timeline. It was like 30,000 years old or even, maybe even longer than that. But there's some really interesting scientific articles and things that have come out that, that even say that it's longer than that. Right. That, that say that the pyramids were really from like there's, there's all of the sentiment that's been eroded underneath. Like there's like pyramids under the pyramids that are coming. and, uh, they they're like challenging all of the science, all of their religious beliefs. All of the things that we talk about today is being the timeline of humanity, right. It it's, it's pretty wild stuff. Um, and, and it's something they'd be interested in because, you know, we even go back into the conversation from yesterday of like the, or yesterday of last week and the queen and the reptilian species. it's so funny how easily you can jump into reptilian, Illuminati, reptiles, uh, controlling the world. Um, but there's like this whole idea of the Sumerians and the Sumerians being visited. And the Sumerians are like one of the very first humanity, like, uh, very first peoples, um, that humanity believed existed and the Sumerian race being visited and given technology that, that we can't even comprehend today. The, the ancient Sumerian societies had mathematical equations to map out the cosmos and, and like, let me look up the timeline of like, when, um, the Sumerian, uh, We're even around, um, because it's, it's so wild when you look up the actual history of, of ancient Sumeria. Um, this says it was like 2,350 BC. So 4,005,000 years ago, um, in Sumer, uh, the Sumerians were people of Southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between 4,100 to 1750 BC. So six, 7,000 years ago, um, like the ancient Sumerian technology let's, you know, let's, let's dive into it. I got a little bit of whiskey left. Let's dive into the ancient Sumerian technology.  we, we might as well, let's see if I can find it. Um, let's see, ancient Sumerian technology. And if you're still here with me, I appreciate ya. This is fun. Let's do it. Ancient Sumerian technology. Um, let's go ahead and see what, uh, is questionable. Let's see what we can find here. So a few of the articles that are coming up is ancient Sumerian technology, nine ancient Sumerian tech, uh, inventions that changed the world. Um, let's see, there's like photo there's like hieroglyphics of the Sumerians with, you know, weird technology and seeing like, um, Kymera reptiles and, and different beings and g

In this week's episode, we discuss the controversial figure Andrew Tate getting banned by Meta from Facebook and Instagram. We also discuss a new biotech company that wants to clone human embryos for organs... creepy. We also discuss the recent accusation by Russia of alleged war crimes by Ukraine.    Subscribe and leave a 5-star review! ----more---- Our website https://redpillrevolution.co   Protect your family and support the Red Pill Revolution Podcast with Affordable Life Insurance. This is attached to my license and not a third-party ad!   Go to https://agents.ethoslife.com/invite/3504a now!   Currently available in AZ, MI, MO, LA, NC, OH, IN, TN, WV Email redpillrevolt@protonmail.com if you would like to sign up in a different state   Leave a donation, sign up for our weekly podcast companion newsletter, and follow along with all things Red Pill Revolution by going to our new website: https://redpillrevolution.co    ----more----   Full Transcription    Welcome to the revolution. Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, and as always, thank you so much for listening today. I appreciate it. From the bottom of my heart, we have some wild things to discuss some happenings in the metaverse some things that have gone on with recent bands. So let's jump into it today. We are going to talk about mark Zuckerberg, unveiling his new. Allegedly boyish metaverse avatar after getting mocked for his creepy dead eye original version. So we will discuss that. We've also discussed a little bit about what the hell the metaverse is, and even if you wanna ever take part in it for any reason, we're also going to talk about a biotech company that wants to take human DNA and basically just create artificial embryos that could be used to harvest organs for medical transplants, which sounds a. It sounds pretty creepy, but when you actually think about what that means, it's extremely creepy and, uh, definitely some sort of human rights violation. And if it's not, it should be, but we will discuss that. We'll also discuss some recent allegations by Russia saying that Ukraine has been using chemical terrorism on its soldiers, as well as a recent, I guess, assassination that happened on the daughter of a Russian intelligence officer, uh, which seems a little bit. A little bit like a war crime to me. So we'll discuss that. We'll also talk about maybe we'll we might have this little bonus article here. We'll see if we get to it, but we got some, some decent things to discuss here. So if we do get to it, we'll talk about a dad who took photos of his toddler. You know, basically like every person who takes photos of their toddler ever. Um, but actually for this one was to send it to a doctor. And Google flagged him as a criminal, like basically for pedophilia distribution in some way, when his doctor asked him for the photo. So we may get to that and discuss it. We are also the main topic for today. Some videos that I have up today are to discuss Andrew Tate. And if you don't know who Andrew Tate is, he's quite the character. And, uh, he's. Influencer, whatever the hell that means today, but he's kind of a Dick  and kind of might be, uh, a little bit of an understatement, but he was recently banned by Instagram and Facebook. So we will discuss why. And if I agree with the decision. So, I guess you'll have to stick around for that. Now. That is what we're gonna discuss today. It's going to be a great conversation, so stick around. But the first thing I need you to do is go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review. It would mean the world to me, if you did. So it's the only way that we can get put up in the ranking. So I appreciate you and love you for listening. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button. If it's your first time here, I appreciate it more than, you know, and if you don't know. And you probably do. It's a good way to get some good karma, leave a five star review. Tell me what you liked about the podcast. Tell me what you hate about Andrew Tate or love about him. I don't know whatever your opinion is.  I don't know, say something on there and leave a five star review. It would mean a lot. Then next thing I needed to do is head over to red pill, revolution dot. See, you can sign up for the subst stack. You'll get all of the articles, all of the videos from today's episode directly in your email, along with the audio podcast, the video podcast, some awesome stuff that I'm building over there directly on the website, where you can get basically all of the content. So head over there right now, and that's all I got for you. So without further ado, let's jump into it. Episode 40 of the red pill revolution podcast. Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoon fed as a. Religion politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood, medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power. Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is. That curtain and I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the revolution. All right. Welcome to episode 40 of the red pill revolution podcast. And the very first topic that we are going to discuss today is going to be mark Zuckerberg, coming out with a new avatar for his metaverse, uh, deal he's got going on there. So it says mark Zuckerberg, um, reveals new boyish metaverse avatar after getting mocked for a creepy dead. Original version.  so well, let's look at this article if you'll be able to see this, uh, if you're watching the video, if not, just look up mark Zuckerberg, metaverse avatar, and you'll see why everybody's going crazy about this because it is quite creepy. Right? I think the idea for people in the metaverse is already kind of a, a weird, uh, idea for them to jump into a. Virtual reality type of world and interact with other people. And it seems to be even creepier when you're doing it with basically me or we characters , everybody's walking around looking like the original we characters you think by now, 20, 22, 10 years after the, we came out that they probably would've improved avatars in some way, shape or form. But I don't know. It seems like Facebook just kind of ripped them off of Nintendo, but from the looks of this picture, The original one's a little bit more, uh, a little bit more 2d. The, the next one's a little bit more 3d, which I don't know how you, you know, they didn't change the whole graphics of the metaverse to do this, but it goes on to say that, uh, mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meda UN revealed of new boyish metaverse avatar on Friday after a creepy DEI version, he posted Monday was roundly. Roundly not round deadly Zuckerberg also on Friday, promised a major graphics update for horizon worlds, meta versus platform, which has been criticized for its budget. Feel on which I guess is what I was just talking about with the, we hold deal on Monday, Zuckerberg shared on his Facebook profile that horizon worlds had launched in France and Spain and posted an image of the Zuckerberg avatar standing in front of the Eiffel. Social media users were quick to de ride the image with some likening it to the graphics of 1990s video games like Zelda and quake in 2007 second life. Now that's an interesting conversation because if you don't know what second life is, second life was a. Some type of like role playing game, you could have played, I don't know, 15 to 20 years ago. Like really like when the internet first started, second life was a, a very commonly used, you know, like third world. I remember my, my father actually talking to me about it and saying how people would like buy houses and buy land in second life. And they would go to a job and they would like do all this crazy stuff. And it sounded almost exactly like. Mark. Zuckerberg's trying to recreate here just with, and with the same exact graphics you think they would do a little bit better job at it, but if you don't know what second life is, go look it up. I guess it has a very, uh, dedicated community of furries over the years. who would meet up there. But, um, it, it is quite wild to me that there's been literally there. There's no difference between the metaverse and what second life was. And so it's like a weird, you know, the idea of like getting, putting a headset on and using, you know, web three type, uh, you know, uh, cryptocurrencies to buy stuff and, uh, NFTs in your home that you can show, like, I guess there's that element to it, but it's nothing new. This has been out for a while. Second life has been around for a very long time, you know? And, and the only difference that they seem to have at all is just. It seems to be more expensive and requires a barrier to entry with a virtual reality headset. So I would say looking at this picture of mark Zuckerberg, the only thing more creepy than mark Zuckerberg's original or second avatar, right? This weird boyish avatar. The only thing creepier than mark Zuckerberg's avatar is. Mark Zuckerberg  if you go back and watch him in front of like the Senate or Congress and you see him sipping, you know, his, his water sipping stuff that he was so famous for, you know, is, is so interesting to see this robot sit in front and answer questions. Exactly. Like a robot would. And so mark Zuckerberg's creepy little avatar here is pushing me no closer to jumping on the metaverse. Now what I would say is that AR VR is absolutely going to come into your life. It's absolutely going to become in, uh, a big facet of business. They're going to find a use for it. You see all of these huge companies like Google, like apple, like Facebook, meta, whatever the hell you want to call it, they're all getting in on this for a reason. And this, the reason is not for today. The reason is for, I don't know, five or 10 years from now. If you remember in. Think back to like Google glass, right? The glasses that you would wear, Google glass was mocked ridiculously for a while, but it looked a lot better than these virtual reality sets. So, so think of like, if you're putting on Google glass and you're walking through your normal day to day, the idea's gonna be that your phone's gonna go away. It's gonna integrate into your glasses. Eventually turn into contacts and eventually be an implant in the back of your head. But the idea is gonna be that it's not gonna be these huge Oculus glasses that you're wearing on your head. The idea is it's gonna be first, something like the Google.  hopefully just not as weird, you know, sci-fi looking, but the Google glass was mocked for, by a ton of people. There was a super long beta program, which like took all the hype away from it. But imagine the Oculus turning into Google glass and then imagine going about your day and doing everything that you would normally do on your phone, where you have to look down your neck, stretches out six different ways and you wake up with a only being able to. To the right instead of the left,  all of that will go away is my guess. All of that's gonna what's gonna happen is it's gonna turn into glasses that you're gonna be able to, that augmented reality is gonna be going about your every day shooting video from it, taking pictures with it. Eventually it'll become integrated into your body somehow. So you don't even have to wear glasses, but I probably would rather. Have glasses, honestly, myself and then the gaming aspects of it. Cool. But there, there's a lot of really interesting business cases that are coming about, and I'm finding this out in my business life, but I really do think that it's gonna become a part of something. Now, I don't think that the virtual reality, we universe that they're creating here is going to be the answer. I think it's more so a test pilot for them to, you know, utilize these things and try new things to see how people like it. I don't know, weird, weird stuff, but that's where we're going a hundred percent. That is where we're going. Augmented reality. VR is gonna be very much so integrated in the people's everyday lives. Probably more than a lot of people would like, but eventually you'll do it because the inconvenience of not doing it will be outweighed by the convenience of doing it. And. What will be a positive thing that comes out of that is we'll be able to get rid of our phones. Right? You'll actually seem like you're interacting with people. You'll look up a little bit more. There probably won't be as many people with scoliosis in the world. So the chiropractors of the world might go away.  a lot of positive things that could come out of this, but one of the negative things is we have to see mark Zuckerberg's creepy little, we face. And, and, uh, even though he updated, it looks just as bad. So anyways, just wanted to throw that out there. I thought that was hilarious that  his, we character, his metaverse avatar is basically just as, almost as creepy as he is in real life. All right. So the next thing that we're gonna discuss here is going to be a little bit more, you know, I guess to me, a little bit more creepy, what they're gonna be doing is says, and this is comes from the business insider.com and it comes from an Israeli company that is going to, it's a biotech company that wants to take human DNA and create artificial embryos to basically take for human organ harvest. You heard that right in true Jurassic park fashion, they want to make cloned humans to do organ harvesting off of what a super. Freaky weird future dystopia. Do we live in where this becomes an acceptable headline, even without a bunch of people going off on how wrong this is, right. I'm pretty sure this would be not allowed legally in a lot of different countries. Um, but let's go ahead and read this, read this article, and then we'll talk about it. This says a biotech company based in Israel wants to replicate a recent experiment that successfully created an artificial mouse embryo from stem cells. Only this time with human. So scientists at wet them's molecular genetics department grew synthetic mouse embryos in the jar without the use of sperm, eggs, or a womb. According to a newspaper published in the journal cell on August 1st, it was the first time the process had been successfully completed insiders Maryanne GU not reported. The, the replica embryos could not develop into fully formed mice and were therefore not. Not real. What does that even mean? Jacob. Hannah, who led the experiment? What does real mean? Real means tangible, right? Maybe they're not complet. Sentient like you and I, or a regular mouse or a regular person. But that doesn't mean they're not real. They don't, they're not mark. Zuckerberg's meta avatar.  like, no, they're real. However, scientists, it says observed the synthetic embryos, having a beating heart blood circulation, the start of a brain, a neural tube, and an intestinal trick. Hannah told MIT technology review after the success of the mouse review or the mouse experiment, he is working to replicate the results with human cells, including his own. The embryo is the best organ making machine and the best 3d bio printer. We tried to emulate what it does. Hannah said in this statement, other experts say that will take significantly more research before synthetic human embryos are within reach renewal BioD is real based company founded by. Hannah wants to use this science for organ tissue transplants that could solve infertility genetic diseases and issues related to old age. For example, the MIT technology review reported that blood cells from the embryo could potentially be used to help boost immunocompromised systems. Renewal bio believes that some of the world's most pressing problems are declining birth rates and fast aging populations to solve these complex and compounding issues. Neuro bio aims to make humanity younger and healthier by leveraging the power of the new stem cell technology. Wow. Okay. In short, what they're doing is they're creating half. So it says, handle told the MIT technology review that he could potentially get around these ethical concerns. So actually let's read the next couple paragraphs, cuz it talks about that. It says to solve these complex issues, we just talked about it O a mirror. My of DRI the acting CEO of renew bio told MIT technology review that the company did not want to overpromise or scare people with the potential technology, but that Hannah's experiment was amazing. The use of human embryo clones for research has been frequently raised ethical research or concerns within the scientific community, including the potential that synthetic embryos may experience pain or sentient, according to a 2017 paper published in the journal of E. Hand has told MIT technology review that he could potentially get around these ethical concerns by creating synthetic human embryos with no heart, no lungs or no brain. Wow. You, that is a literal, super villain. They're cloning people to harvest their organs in, in a test tube. Like what, how in the world is this? A UN violation. I'm sure it is right. I'm sure you're gonna have to go to a, uh, Biolab in Ukraine that doesn't exist to have this type of thing done, you know, like the other 17 that still according to the United States doesn't exist.  so, um, so yeah, they, they're definitely gonna have to skirt some, some legality rules. Now this is something that China's been doing for a while is, is some type of like, if you've ever heard of the word Kymera, Kymera is, are a real thing. So if you think back to like, there's like a lot of like, Like not, not biblical, but like hieroglyphics ideas. Think of like the man. Uh, the centar right. A centar is a Chimera in the way, because it's a human mixed with a horse in a, a Chimera is something that they've been doing in China for decades. They've been literally taking animals, cloning them and mixing their DNAs so that they're not considered something that falls under the laws that we have created because we never created laws with the intention for China to recreate. Animal DNA creatures. And so they've been using these creatures and mixing them with things like pigs in humans, so that they can do these types of, or organ harvesting, which I'm finding out recently. And you'll find this out in the next episode, where I do an interview with a guy who, who discusses this type of thing, where they do these live organ harvestings in China, on certain communities, which is gonna be an awesome. Um, not awesome is probably not the right term, but a very intriguing and deep and highly concerning episode is probably much more accurate than interesting or any other words that I used for that. But this, this seems to be a direction that humanities going, that a lot of people ethically are not even aware of. They're not aware of this. This article was like pretty buried on Reddit that I found that, um, and it was just released nine hours ago. So maybe that's why, but it's, it's not a very talked about issue that there's literally animal human bags of meat out there that they're taking organs from in China, trying to recreate. If you don't believe me, there's scientific articles where they're talking about this thing, and this is not, this is not new. This is not conspiracy theories, nothing. This is legitimate science. I don't know if you consider that legitimate, but, you know, God making of, of scientists by creating their own animals. I mean, there was a quote that was pulled from Jurassic park about, you know, doing something before it's read. Like I saw it from this post about this. Let's see if I can find it. Cuz I think it was a pretty well relatable quote to what's actually happening here. It talks, you know, if you know the idea. Um, you know, Jurassic park, which I'm sure most of you  understand. Um, it, it's the idea that we're doing something that we don't know what we're doing. Right? We have no idea what the implications of these actions are going to be. We have no idea what's actually gonna come of this. We have no idea what type of sentience these things have. We have no idea what we are doing yet. We are doing it anyways. And nobody's talking about like, this literally has 200, 322 comments on it and it's buried.  and we're cloning humans, right? Like it's, this is, this is not, this, this should not be a small deal. Um, so let's read what it says here. It says that the, uh, let's see if I can find this Jurassic park. Now, the interesting thing that Reddis been doing is they've changed it from top comments to best comments, which who decides what's best they do. So they can go in there and curate it, however you like. And you have to go in there and specifically choose to go to top comments instead of best comments. But let's see if I can even find this. And if not, I'll, I'll kind of give you a synopsis of what was said here, but it looks like they've buried a lot of this. Of the actual comments here. So maybe I won't be able to find it, but I'm sure it's readily available for you to look up a quote from Jurassic park where they're talking about this. But the whole idea is that we're doing something that we don't understand where we're putting ourselves as a position of humanity. We are, our scientists are acting as if they are gods, right? They are messing with human DNA and mandating you to do it. Or else you don't get your job. They are creating human clones that they're taking lungs hearts and. Brains away from so that they've not legally considered humans. We, this is the most sickening, disgusting thing that's going on in the, like, probably not the most, but pretty damn up there. And nobody's talking about it, right? We, we are. So, and that's the problem with the internet is that we are so overloaded with so much information. You can go on Reddit and. 500 posts that are more lighting up to the brain of the average individual and then buried in there somewhere as this article. And it never sees the light a day. And even to the point, I should have a whole damn episode on this and we're gonna be talking about some random social media influencer getting banned, right? And now he's not random. He's like one of the most, you know, controversial top people of right now. But nowhere near the amount of attention and energy should be drawn to that is just drawn to this right. We're gonna be talking about that for probably even further, because I didn't do enough research on that. This is wild. This is crazy. I just saw, like I said, this article came out nine, nine hours ago, but it's absolutely something that we should be talking about and something that we should be highly highly concerned with. Uh, but anyways, um, let's just read this small portion and we'll, it says, I mean, I guess we've read a little bit more of it than we, we needed to, this is crazy. This is wild. There should be outcry everywhere in the world about this and nobody is talking about it. So maybe we should, you.  bring it up. Maybe I'll I'll, I'll do a whole episode deep dive into it. And, and, and I think it'd be fair because the Chimera conversation is absolutely one that you should know about too, in, in the, you know, atrocities that are happening in these deep, dark biomedical labs with these villain, like super villain scientists out there creating monsters that we don't even know what we're. And at the same time, they're creating AI. And at the same, like literally every Jurassic park would be the least of my concerns compared to the AI super robots that we're creating that are gonna be doing your chores. According to Elon Musk and the Kymera slash cloning of humans for organ harvesting. If they created dinosaurs and put 'em in a zoo, that's pretty damn cool. This. This is not the thing.  like, let's, let's go back to Jurassic part times because I'd much rather have that than I think have this, uh, anyways. So the next topic that we're gonna discuss here is going to be the Russia Ukraine situation. We haven't had a, a really big, um, we haven't had a really big update on this recently, and it seems like you almost have to find this information yourself, right? If you're, you know, how many people on, on your road have a damn Ukraine flag on their porch. It's so crazy. But you really aren't hearing much about it. And, and this might be why there's some weird, uh, black hat, war tactics going on here between Russia and Ukraine and a good amount of it from the headlines and the headlines. Only the headlines that we're seeing that are curated for us on the American, uh, you know, internets just like China had their own 10 years ago. We now have our own, you know, access to information cuz you can't even find the, um, what is it RT? Russia, uh, news outlets talking about these things. You have to go to Reddit and only get spooned. What they're telling you that they want you to, to, to hear through the censorship of our social media channels. So now this comes from, um, in a butcher this, but it's like a foreign news company. I'll just zero a L J a Z E E R a. And it says that Russia accuses Ukraine of chemical terrorism using tox. So that Russia is accusing Ukraine of poisoning their soldiers, which would be against the Geneva convention. It says Kiev dismisses the allegations of poisoning, Russian soldiers with BTO lium, toxin, and says that invading troops likely eight expired canned foods. Yeah. Okay.  we think you're poisoning our soldiers. Nah, they probably got some bad chili from Kroger.  uh, it says that Russian's defense minister accused Ukraine of poisoning. Some of its soldiers in the Russia controlled part of Ukraine, Southern Eastern region of Zappia in late July. An advice to Ukraine's interior ministry said that on Saturday in response to the alleged poisoning could have been caused by Russian forces. Eating expired. Canned. A number of Russian soldiers were taken to a military hospital with signs of severe poisoning on July 31st test showed a toxic SU substance Butlin bow bot toum B O T U L I N U M bot toum toxin type B in their bodies. The Russian defense ministry said on, on the fact of chemical terrorism sanctioned by the Zelensky regime, Russia's preparing, supporting evidence with the results of all the a. Said the ministry in a statement, it did not say how many soldiers suffered poisoning or what their condition was now, or elaborate on what the supporting evidence was involved. Butum toxin type B is a neurotoxin that cause that can cause bot bot, gosh, this word, stupid botulism.  when ingested and is previously contaminated food product, but it can also have medical uses. Russia's defense ministry said that his findings will be given to the organization for prohibited of chemical. Or op C w evidence of chemical terrorism by the Keine was soon be formally forwarded to the op C w through the permanent mission of Russia. It. Um, it goes on to talk about the Russian expired me an additional investigation was also being conducted by the possible poisoning of the head of the provisional administration of Kirsten region. Uh, with alleged chemical warfare agents, it added Sodo was a former mayor of the city of Kirsten and was appointed to head of the region of the same name when Russian troops overran it early in March. Uh, the par does not clarify whether the poisoning could have been caused by expired can't. Which is often found. So he had the same poisoning. So they're using this consistently or allegedly not using it. Um, but there's some really bad spam in Ukraine, according to this article, because they seem to be writing it off pretty easily as food. Um, now. The next one is so, so that's the, the intro to this right over the last week. That's in the last several days, we saw an article now about the potential of Ukraine poisoning, Russian soldiers. Okay. Now what we're seeing is a article that says that the car bomb kills the daughter. Of spiritual guide to Putin's Ukrainian invasion. Now this is a different headline than CNN originally had, which was Daria Dugina killed car killed in the car explosion. And it was a Russian intelligence officer. So, so it basically was I, I can go find the exact heading of it. Um, but basically they changed the title of it to make it sound like some, like this guy was the entire reason for the war happening in the first place. Absolutely not the case, right. At least from my understanding it, I don't think anybody can answer that question, honestly, actually, I don't know. And either is this CNN, but the original title of that article was daughter of Russian of Russian who was inspirational force behind Putin's invasion of Ukraine killed in a car explosion. You know, what they don't use in that title is the word civilian. It's not the intelligence officer who. Killed in a car bomb. It's not a Russian soldier. It it's the daughter of an intelligence officer. So you're literally going off after family members going after family members of, of intelligence. That's a civilian that's again, a violation of the Geneva convention is killing civilians. This is a violation of the Geneva convent. No matter what you do, nobody gets, unless you're the mafia, you shouldn't be going after people's family. And even then it's wrong, obviously. But in this case, if, if you're trying to curate world support from the United States citizens, the way to get to their hearts is not by bombing random people's children. Right. And we're literally funding this entire war. Right. But let's go ahead and we'll, we'll watch this. I don't know if it's, uh, I think it's a part of the actual, uh, video. It says warning, this contains graphic information. So we'll watch it. We'll see if it says anything, if it's just the explosion, uh, which it looks like it is. So let's see, I'll turn this down for you guys. So it's basically just showing the aftermath of a car, uh, all down the road, a bunch of pieces of the car, everywhere. Daughter of an influential and prominent supporter of Vladimir Putin was killed yesterday. When her car exploded in a town near Moss.  that is according to Russian state media, which also says it is likely an explosive device was planted in the car. Daria dinos was driving. Wow. And if that's her, she's, uh, probably in her very early thirties, late twenties, um, pretty blonde woman. Um, and now she's become the, the. Uh, become the victim of a bombing by obvious you Lee Ukrainian forces. So this says that Russian authorities said, uh, Sunday, that they had opened a murder investigation after the daughter of influential ultranationalist philosopher, Alexander Dugin was killed by a car bomb on the outskirts of Moscow. So he's not even an intelligence officer. He's a Phil philosopher and they use the word ultra nationalist, right. Ultra omega, right. All. The ultra extremes of the world to justify the killing of random civilians. And this is coming from CNN. So let's see what they have to say about it. It says the Russian investigative committee said that believe someone planned and ordered the car explosion that killed D DIA Dugina based on the evidence already collected from the blast, taken into account that data already obtained. The investigation believes that the crime was pre-planned and was of an ordered. Dugina said, uh, died in the scene after the ex an explosive device presumably installed in the Toyota land cruiser went off on a public road in the car, caught fire at around 9:00 PM near the village of I'm not even gonna try it. According to the press service of the Russian investigative committee is re uh, reported by the Russian state news agency, T a S S. Duga uh, father is a Russian author in ideolog accredited with being the architect of, or spiritual guide to Russian's invasion of Ukraine. He is purported to have significant influence over Russian president Vladimir Putin and was described as Putin's brain. Yeah, of course. You're gonna call that when you randomly kill the guy's daughter, he's a full philosopher. You don't get to kill somebody or their daughter for their thought. So here's a video of him. Uh, this is what he said about Trump and Putin in 2017, which I'm sure will frame him very well being from CNN. So let's watch this or listen, I guess, cause I'm like, I don't have it downloaded, but let's watch it slash listen, cuz you can't see it.  go ahead Mr. Trump in Trump with trust. Meet the man who has been dubbed Putin's brain ultra conservative philosopher and TV personality. Alexander Dugin is a champion of Russian nationalism. And he says, president Trump is on the same Waveland as long as I could. Uh, Judge on Donald Trump. I have remarked many, many similarities was my, uh, my thought and his integrational speech discourse was as if I would, uh, I would write it myself. Dugin Dugin is seen as one of the architects of Russia's growing ideology, a conservative nationalism with roots in the Orthodox church that is being exported across the world. As an alternative to liberal democracy. November 8th, 2016 was, uh, important. Victory for Russia. And for Putin, personally, Dugin says that Putin didn't medal with the us selection, but that he provided Trump with a different kind of assistance. The real help of Putin to Trump was the example and notice how they immediately try to tie the guy. Who's their favorite sports team. Ukraine's soldiers. Uh, they immediately try to try him, tie him to Trump and make him look bad to their, to their people so that they can shout from the rooftops that somebody who was pro chump and pro Putin's daughter got murdered in the street for no reason because of his pH. So, well, let's go ahead and read. The rest of this says that both Duggan and his daughter have been sanctioned by the United States. The United Kingdom sanctioned Dugina in July for being a frequent and high profile contributor of disinformation in relation to Ukraine in the Russian invasion on Ukraine, on various online platforms. Wow. Interesting. The United States sanctioned their family, uh, and now CNN's obviously. Finding some way to make this a positive thing that his daughter was killed. Videos of the explosion showed a vehicle on the fire at the side of the road and smashed car parts thrown across the surrounding area. One of them verified video appears to show Dugin at the scene. A friend of Dugina said that he believed Dina's father was the true target of the blast, or possibly both of them as the car belonged to Alexander it's her father's car. Um, Desna drove another car, but she drove his car today and Alexander went separat. Uh, this was Andre Krasnoff who's the head of Rusky Goza or Russian horizon social movement in a personal acquaintance of dug Dina's family, Dina's family, um, a Russian foreign ministry official implied that Ukrainian state structures were responsible for the explosion. A claim that Ukrainian authorities have denied. Of course you did, because you killed his daughter and you know, you're not gonna get public support surrounding. Even though CNN will try to make it a positive thing. Right? So they go on and on and on about this. But I guess this moral of the story here is nobody is in the right. This is a ideological war and a war for claw, Schwab, and a war for, you know, the, the powers that be, if you want to use that term, the, the elites of the world, the, the, you know, you wanna include conservatives in there include, you know, the Bush family include the Clinton family, all of the corrupt, you know, huge, the Biden. Crime family. All of them are a part of this and they know what's going on here. They were all funneling money through Ukraine, you know? So nobody's, nobody's in the right here, you know, obviously Russia's not in the right for invading a. What is believed to be a sovereign nation. Um, nobody is correct in starting this war. It's a pissing match between Russia and the UN and really the us, because the us is just the representative in the world of the UN. Now we're starting to see that China's tensions with Taiwan are raising as they are sending missiles directly over Taiwan, which Japan just responded to saying that they're not going to allow it, and they're gonna do, uh, responses potentially. As a result because they believe that it's unacceptable that that's happening to Taiwan because they know that they're next. Once Taiwan actually gets taken over, right. They're the very next step on that stool to creating the one China model. Uh, but we're seeing all of these tensions rise and we're seeing that Ukraine is not the Saint of a nation that all of the Democrats of the world are flying their flags believing. Right. They're they're this is not. Right. Murdering a philosopher's daughter and then, you know, passing it off as being, oh, we didn't do that. Yes, you did. You're in war with them and you, you literally sanctioned them as of course, that's what happened here. I mean, I don't know don't this is all hearsay, but , but it seems very likely, right. Especially when CNN's trying to make it a positive thing by tying him to Trump immediately. So. Pretty bizarre, pretty wild that we're starting to see, you know, and it's, it'll be interesting to see how people try to defend this, you know, people have gotten so, so balls deep in being team Ukraine at this point. And, uh, how do you respond when they're randomly killing philosophers daughters for speaking out on social media platforms? And maybe it was, maybe it was accidental and maybe they were going after him, but even that's not okay. Right. If you're trying to be a pro-democracy state, that man is not a part of the governmental structure, that man is not a part of the military. And according to the Geneva convention, he is not able to be a target in this war, just for speaking out on these topics. Okay. Is the UN gonna do anything about that? No. Is Nita gonna do anything about that? No, because this is their own proxy war right there. And, and especially when it comes to the, you know, what, we just talked about the poisoning of soldiers. And, and especially when we're talking about the, uh, you know, murder of random, innocent civilians, that's on their hands. Right. We funded this. We funded this guys. If you don't understand that we, as the American citizens funded 80 something, however many billions of dollars now for them to go car bomb, innocent civilians with our tax money. Are you okay with that? Because this was all fun, right? We were all pro not, we, I, wasn't a part of that. You'd know that if you followed me the whole time on this war, but I I'm neither take sides. They're both. But we funded this guys. And, and, and if, and nobody's saying anything about the amount of money that we're peddling over to Zelensky and his, his, you know, regime, all of the, you know, billions of dollars of weapons that our tax dollars have gone to, for them to be able to fight this war properly against Russia. All of that is funded on the backs of you going to. You paying state taxes in, in national taxes, federal taxes directly from your paycheck, and then those that money, your money being sent to Ukraine, to poison soldiers around the Geneva convention and to blow up innocent civilians daughters. That's our money at work guys. That's Biden's administration. That is what they're doing with your tax dollars. Instead of protecting your, our children at schools, that's our tax dollars at work instead of, I don't know, funding the proper, uh, conversation around abortion, right? How it should be properly framed in, in how people should, you know, we shouldn't be funding planned parenthood. Maybe we should be funding education in schools. And that reproduction is actually the result. Sex and, and maybe we should be educating, uh, underdeveloped communities and, and, you know, minority communi. Maybe we should be doing that instead of, I don't know, poisoning Russian soldiers, uh, and blowing up in the, in the civilians, maybe some good ideas there. Uh, but no, no, that's not gonna happen because, you know, 70%, this is a, a, a percentage that was given by somebody who was on the ground in the arms trade in Ukraine. I'll, I'll have to find the video, but, uh, he said that basically 70% of the weapons that are being sent to Ukraine are unaccounted. Only 30% of the weapons. Now, I don't know if that's true, but it's his claim and it, he, he threw it out there frivolously it wasn't like he knew the exact percentage and was marking it down on a piece of paper. But that was his guess 30% maybe of the weapons that we're sending to Ukraine are actually getting in the hands of Ukrainian soldiers. Where's the other 70% going. Maybe to the IRS  so, um, yeah, so maybe not the, the white hat government that we were thinking they were. Okay. Um, now I will save this article for the end of the episode. We'll talk about maybe the Google. Flagging this father as a criminal for sending pictures to his doctor of his child, which maybe you probably shouldn't do anyways, cuz that's a little weird, but uh, but anyways, we'll, we'll discuss that after. Um, but the next thing I need you to do right now is head over to red pill, revolution.co, sign up for these subs stack, get the emails directly to your inbox that has the podcast. All right. Um, you're going to. Every single week, it is going to be a concerted effort on my behalf. You'll get it directly to your inbox, to have the links, everything that we're discussing here. Um, and you will get the very first one I believe, uh, probably Monday, tomorrow. So, um, I will throw that together and you will get it directly to your inbox, red pill, revolution.co. The next thing you need to do is head over to the website and click on the link that says, get I. Okay. Click to the top, click the menu. And the only way to support this podcast right now is by going directly to that link and signing yourself up for some life insurance. Now, you might wonder why you need life insurance. And I wonder the same thing, but then I got married and then I had children and I realized that, oh, life does actually go on when I die. And oh, maybe if you don't have millions of dollars in the bank, you're gonna leave your family members in the worse off situation than they already are when you are not present there to support. All right. So if you have children, you have people that depend on you. You have debt that you don't wanna leave to your family members and you don't have millions of dollars in the bank. Maybe, maybe just, maybe you should head your bet because 100% you're gonna die at some point. And you don't know whether that's gonna be today. You don't know whether that's gonna be a month from now, or I hope for you when you're 120 years old, but the likelihood of that is very low. So go get yourself some life insurance right now. It's directly through me. I am your agent of record. Um, you can head over to the website, sign up, you'll see me as your agent. If you have any. Email me, Austin, red pill, revolution.co. And I would love to help you out answer your questions and maybe even help you pick out your policy. If you ask nicely,  all right, but you can do it all online. It doesn't take more than, I don't know, 10 minutes to sign up. Um, 95% approval rating. All of that stuff. Great prices. I got a $2 million policy for myself for like 60 bucks a. Um, really, really awesome stuff. So head over there right now, you won't get any phone calls, none of that BS that normally comes with signing for up for insurance that I know very well about. So do that right now. And then if you haven't subscribed five star review. Appreciate ya. Love ya. Now let's get into the next conversation. All right. So next thing we're gonna do is we're going to discuss the big topic of today, which is the fact that the controversial, very controversial social media star, Andrew Tate, himself was banned from Facebook and Instagram this week. Now we'll read this article, which says that, uh, he was banned on Friday from meta platforms. He says that the 35 year old was banned due to violations of metas policies on dangerous organizations and individuals. According to BBC, before he was banned, T had over 4.7 million followers on his Instagram account, the former kick BA uh, kickboxing champion discussed the band with popular Twitch, streamer, Aiden Ross. And he said, I'm quite understanding of their position. It's not a big loss for me. It's not something I use. I'm kind of relieved because the real world is such a beautiful place. The less things on my phone. And it's just one less thing I have to look at. I'll just get in my supercar and go for a drive. Wow. All right. So let's listen to just what he has says here. This, his 20 seconds about being banned. If it'll play . Um, so basically what this guy is, is he, is you, if you haven't heard his name, you're probably not on TikTok. He's like half of my feed and I don't follow any of the accounts that he's actually a part of. Um, he he's a joke, but you know, we'll talk about it as you get banned. I don't know exactly why they Bann me. Um, I just tried to log in Instagram a couple hours ago. Wouldn't let me, I have good people in the case. I trust due process with Instagram. I'm actually quite understanding of their position. I do understand it very, very well. I'm not angry at them in any regard. Uh, it's not a big loss for me. It's not something I use too often, but I do understand their position. And it goes on to say that Tate told the Twitch streamer, he doesn't know why he was banned. We just talked. We just heard that part. So we'll skip that. It says that Tate's first rise of the limelight came when he appeared on as a contestant on the UK version of big brother in 2016. Don't know what that is. He was kicked off of that for a video that came out that showed him allegedly attacking a woman, um, which was basically him sitting there. In some type, like this girl was in like lingerie on the couch. I watched it. You probably don't need to. Um, but she was in some type of linger on the couch and he had like a, you know, some type of leather whip that he was hitting her on her butt with. And you know, it didn't seem very positive. It didn't seem, but it also. Could have been taken outta context in some sort of weird fetish thing, but it obviously is, you know, go watch the video cuz you'll see what I'm talking about. They show no context before or after he's just sitting there hitting her, but it's obviously looks terrible. And if it's not something that they're both consenting to is very, very wrong, which probably talks about his whole, you know, ecosystem of conversations. This guy is all around the high hyper. Uh, you know, if, if there is a real thing such as toxic masculinity, um, I, I don't think it's masculinity is the wrong word. This guy's just an asshole right there. There's no toxic masculinity here. He's just a douche bag. Um, so he, he goes on and on about how women are just. Tools and how, how they're owned by people or men. And, um, they're intrinsically lazy. And he, he says some pretty crazy stuff, right? And so it says that he was in 2017 during the height of the Harvey, Einstein allegations tape was suspended by Twitter for saying that women should bear responsibility for being sexually assaulted. So we'll see if we can get the actual tweet of that. Um, I don't think I saw it when they posted it here. Uh, Now it says that, um, in these types of situations, while liberals screamed that nobody should rape women can walk around naked and men shouldn't look, uh, shouldn't look, you import waves of third world migrants, but that's a different point entirely. My point is this. If my sister was raped, I'd be furious. However, I'd ask details and say, what the fuck are you drunk at a dude's house? You don't know. In those types of situations, pretending women are blameless and men shouldn't rape is stupid people shouldn't steal poor prep temps. Yeah. I'm not sure. I breed British very well. Easiest way to protect your daughter, teach her self-awareness and to avoid poor decisions or ensure every man on earth. Uh, won't rape her. Uh, okay. So definitely a tinge of victim blaming there. Um, but you know, nothing that free speech. Allow for you to be an asshole. That's like kind of an interesting conversation about this is, do I agree with this? Uh, do I think in today's censorship world, that if they are going to censor people based. Their thoughts, beliefs and discussions that, and how they negatively affect the real world, which is not what they're doing. Um, but let's, let's play in that fantasy world. If that is the case, then he should probably be on a list here after all of the weird things that have come up and all the shitty things that he's said. But again, I don't agree with censorship at any level. So I think if you're a 35 year old man child, Look, and we character, you should still be able to show the world that you're an asshole for your words. And the world should be able to look at you and laugh at you and know that you're a joke and be able to judge you for the way that you talk. Do I think he should be banned? No. Do I think he's a joke if you know, is he misogynistic? Yes. Is he an asshole? Yes. Is he, uh, somebody that I would want my son watching? No, he wouldn't watch him. Um, is he a caricature of what they want the right to be considered? Yes. Do I want that representing what fatherhood or, or manhood looks like on the, our, you know, on the more non left leaning people? No. Is he a good representation to that? No, he's a jerk. He's an asshole. He's misogynistic. He he's a, a, seems like a piece of shit. Human being, to me, who's only focused on money and fucking girls, like he's 18 years old. Uh, and maybe at some point should have grown up and didn't uh, but do I think that he. Have duct tape put on his mouth and can never talk again to the general public? No, I think they should be able, everybody should be able to look at him and judge him for the things that he says, because speaking is not a crime, nothing he did here is a crime on Instagram and Facebook. Now there are some crimes that do come up when you talk about Andrew Tate that are highly concerning. That makes me think that yeah, nobody should be taking this guy's advice. One of which being that his house was rated for human traffick. Um, allegedly they found nothing. Uh, but let's see if I can find the article on that, where it says that. Um, alright, let's read, let's read this through here, because this article talks about some of the things that this guy has said, and then we'll watch a couple clips here of, of what he's actually said and to get some context. So you can make your own opinion about it, because maybe you disagree with me. Maybe you like the guy. Um, I can't seem to find any way to like. In a leather jacket who wears sunglasses inside, calling out women.  this article says that now this article comes from the guardian and it says inside the violent misogynistic world of T's new star, Andrew Tate, it says observer investigation reveals how the ex kickboxer and big brother contestant from Luton has gone from obscurity to global internet fame in months. Uh, now it says that Andrew Tate says women. Now this is again, so take the context of this. Who's writing it. You know, I I'm trying to be unbiased in this. I do. Like this guy, it's not somebody I would want to hang out with. It's not somebody who I would associate myself with. It's not somebody who I agree with on a lot of his accounts of like, you know, and then again, I'm just looking at clips from TikTok that people are pulling that are probably the most wild things that he says, and maybe I'm wrong. But from those wild clips that I've seen, you can't find wild clips of me justifying rape. You can't find wild clips of me saying that women have no value and that their property, you can't find it because I don't say that that's not how I feel.   Maybe I haven't listened to a full podcast of him, for sure. And maybe he's a nice guy, which I have heard from, uh, Tom Sura and his wife had them him on or something. And that's how he originally got to be pretty big and they seem to like him and think that he's a caricature and he's just playing this role and like making a bunch of money off of being ridiculous and that he doesn't actually believe a lot of the thing. So give him whatever you want to, you know, give him in Grace Wise. But I, I just, you'll never hear that come outta my mouth because I. I'm not saying that because I don't believe it.  but it says Andrew TA says that women belong in the home, can't drive in our man's property. He also thinks that victims of rape must bear responsibility for their attacks and dates women aged 18 to 19, because he can make an imprint on them. According to videos posted online. Now that is correct. I've heard that one in other clips, the British American kickboxer who poses with fast cars, guns, and portrays himself as a cigar. Smoking Playboy talks about hitting and choking women, which he also said, I heard that one and we'll listen to that one too. Trashing their belongings. Stopping them from going out, um, will lead into some of these videos and read some of those afterwards. But it says that Tate's views have been described as extremely misogynistic by domestic about domestic abuse charities, capable of radicalizing men and boys to commit harm offline. No, I don't think that's the case. Um, but whatever, but the 35 year old is not a fringe personality looking lurking in an obscure corner of the dark web. Instead he's one of the most famous figures in on TikTok where videos of him have been watched 11.6 billion times style is a self-help GU offering his mostly male fans, a recipe for making money, pulling girls and escaping the matrix. Tate has gone in a matter of months from near obscurity to one of the most talked about people in the. In July, there were more Google searches for his name than Donald Trump or Kim Kardashian. His rapid surge of fame was not by chance. Evidence obtained by the observer shows that followers of TA are being told to flood social media with videos of him choosing the most social media clip or controversial clips in order to achieve maximum views and engagement. Um, the coordinated effort involving thousands of members of Tate's private online AC academy. Hustlers university and a network of copycat accounts on TikTok have been described by experts as a blatant attempt to manipulate the algorithm in artificially boost his content in less than three months. The strategy has earned to make huge following online and potentially made him millions of pounds, uh, with 127,000 members paying $39 a month to join hustlers community. Uh, many of them, boys and men from the UK and. Yet, despite much of the content appearing to break TikTok rules, which explicitly ban massaging the and copycat accounts. The platform appears to have done little to limitate spread or ban the account responsible. Instead he has propelled him into the mainstream allowing clips of him to proliferate and actively promoting them to young users, uh, raised in the east estate of young London. Uh, Luton the SI the son of a catering assistant in chest master TA has been long making headlines for storing controversy through his twenties. He worked as a TV producer and then he was a kickboxer. Nobody cares. Um, nobody cares. Nobody cares. Nobody cares. Uh, let's see if we can find the part about the trafficking. Uh, it says in another video, he was, uh, allegedly investigated by police for abusing a woman, which he denied in a case where he had his house rated devices confiscated and was held in a cell for two days. Uh, it says that let's see. Oh, wow. He also openly discussed being accused of violence against several women, although he has not understood to have ultimately been charged with any offenses. Um, in one interview, he describes an in incident where a woman, well, I can't talk today. A woman knocked a phone out of his hand in a club and a man punched him. So they started wrestling and the tussle, he accidentally hit the woman and broke her jaw. He says, Wow. Also another thing you'll never hear about me  um, so it says that Tate has understood to have left the UK for Romania and one video explaining his reasons for the move. He suggested that it become, uh, easier to evade rape charges. Wow. This is probably 40% of the reason he moved there. He said in one video adding I'm not a rapist, but I like the idea of just being able to do what I want. I like being. Free. I'd like to hear that video. I have not heard that one. Um, and I've seen it a, a fair amount of his videos looking and researching for this, but let's go ahead and watch a video so you can hear this dummies voice and see, and have your opinion for yourself on whether or not he should be banned from social media and being able to speak to the general public. And here we. Someone breaks in the house. I'm not sending her to fight. It's my job, right? I have to risk my life to protect her. So when someone doesn't break in the house and I ask her for breakfast, I expect it to be made. You cannot stop. You cannot give up. You're in the most fantastic place on the planet for making money hustle's university. And the only person who could ruin that is you welcome to the metaverse inject it into your brain. And if you only exist amongst the money, you're gonna end up with some money. Welcome, El. Do you think that women are property? I think my sister is her husband's property. Yes. When a bride is walking down the aisle to marry the groom, the father walks next to her and gives her away. Ah, how you cheating you cheating. It's bang out the machete, boom in her face and grip her up by the neck, but show up bitch. All right. So there is some of the things that come up when you. Research some of these controversial videos. So let's start with the very first thing, which is his hustler's university. Okay. Andrew T basically started his own pyramid scheme. Okay. Hustler's university is a pyramid scheme where he gets guys, I guess, specifically men to join this university under the idea that they're gonna make a bunch of money and he's gonna teach them how to make money. Like he made it. I'm not sure where he made his money from. Sounds like it could have been from his sex trafficking. So maybe that's a bigger concern about this hustler's university. It should be called, uh, you know, trafficking university, but basically it's a pyramid scheme. He made a Ponzi scheme out of people distributing his own content for him for $39 or 39 pounds a month. Okay. So basically what happens is you bring, you know, you come into hustler's university from a. Then you go take his content, you post it on TikTok with your link to have them go sign up for this hustler's university and do the same thing that you just did. You make a percentage off the people that signed up under your link. He makes a percentage off of everybody. Here's him. You know, don't mind the pyramid that I'm making. Here's him, here's you? Here's the people you bring on it all trickles up and he makes the most money. That's a Ponzi scheme. There's no real value. He posts videos of him standing by Bugattis. Uh, like they're probably not rented. I don't know the guy's probably worth some decent money. Uh, but. It's a pyramid scheme. That's all. This is right. It's nothing new. And, and it's allowed to, you know, a bunch of people are signing up for it because he's a wild, crazy, controversial figure, which you know, who cares. They should lose their money anyways to this man. If you're dumb enough to sign up thinking this guy's gonna be the one who makes you rich, I tend not to take advice from almost 40 year old man, children in leather vests with cigars in their mouth, sunglasses on inside who claimed to get all the 19 year. You know, sex in the world, like, yeah, you're probably not the role model or mentor that people should be looking for. Now. I think there's an interesting conversation there, which is this something people are actually looking for or is he gaming the algorithm, right? Is he gaming the algorithm through this Ponzi scheme that he created and then people are going and distributing a bunch of his content. And then he gets famous off of people giving him money to distribute his content, to make him famous, to give him money. I don't know. I don't see how this I, you. Business wise seems to be working just fine for him. If 129,000 people are paying 39 pounds a month, but he's not the guy I'm generally gonna go look for advice for. And you know, it's speaking to the, the idea that is this something that TikTok is circulating, right? The idea is that there's a segmented TikTok. There's a TikTok in China, that's all violin playing and math and science and, you know, making their children in communities, uh, uh, the best possible people they can be. And then them flooding our system. With these toxic ideologies with these, uh, terrible, you know, caricatures of what it means to be on one side or the. Whether it's the blue haired, L G BT Z or Z, uh, you know, nothing against the LGS BS or the, you know, but the Ts are obviously a, a movement that's been coming up from social media, right? That's something that has not existed before this and, and is being pushed in, in pushed into our ideology, being pushed into our school systems, being pushed into social media accounts, to normalize it so that when your children get on TikTok and whatever damn age you get, and I've seen six year olds with cell phones on. Whatever you give them to that that's gonna be what's flooding their, their, uh, their consciousness, right? So when you have somebody being pushed and pushed and pushed over again, it's, it's the laws of advertising, right? If there's numbers involved, eventually you get a certain outcome. And if there's a, how many billion views that 11 billion views of this guy has. Yeah. How would the world, does it get to that point? If the algorithm is true to attention, which is showing that if you watch his content over and over again, or you watch the full video, it's gonna recirculate it. So apparently people are finding maybe just entertainment, value, controversy, value, whatever it is, the currency that he's trading in is attention. And through that attention, he's pushing these shitty ideologies that are making, you know, are they corrupting young youth? Yeah. You get a guy who's on there talking super confidently and making him look super cool with his stupid sunglasses, his, you know, uh, shaved head in his Bugatti in the background, , it's it. Is it positive? No. Should he be banned? No, I don't think so. I think that he should be a, you know, should there be better, uh, understanding of talk's algorithms and should we allow them to flood our community with negative ideologies? No. Um, but that's a, that's a platform conversation, not an individual conversation. Right. And, and maybe you wanna talk about meta and Instagram and Facebook making these decisions. You know, I don't agree what this guy says. Maybe put a content filter on there that says, you know, uh, should be 18 and up. And I, again, I don't even agree with that really. Um, but if you're gonna do something, there's no reason somebody shouldn't be able to talk. Even if they're saying stupid, Bad rude things, right. If you can go outside and say, it's somebody, as long as he's not specifically calling on violence for somebody or, you know, um, literally that's about it that you can get in trouble for on the town square, then you shouldn't get, I believe wholeheartedly that social media companies should follow the constitution. They should have to follow our us laws, at least when dealing with people in the us and in this case, This does not do that. He didn't say anything that was go kill X, Y, and Z go, you know? Uh, shoot. So and so, no, he didn't say any of those things. He made himself look like a douche bag. Now all the women and men who are right in sound in their mind know he's a douche bag and they're not gonna listen to him. They're laughing at him. They're everybody. Who's like 99% of people who are watching this man are laughing at what a douche bag. And no, they would never want to come within five feet of him, no matter how confident you talk and how you spit out, you know, your, your coffee. When you talk about all the girls who want you and no, nobody, nobody likes that. Women don't like that. And the women that do are the ones who are getting $45,000 worth of work done on themselves, because they're not confident in who they are. And that's not somebody that I would've want to attract into my life. So I'm not going to follow. Somebody who attracts women like that. Right? The, the women that you want, if you are a young male is the one who is yeah. At confidence is attractive. Right. Of course, as always, right. Confidence is a number one thing. It means that you believe in yourself that you have some sense of self a

HelloFresh liebt sein US-Geschäft, China liebt sein IPO-Geschäft und die Philippiner lieben 1% von Elon Musks Gesamtvermögen. Und ganz nebenbei attackiert ein Milliarden-Aktivist Disney. Alle wollen mehr Proteine, Kymera Therapeutics (WKN: A2QBSH) will weniger Proteine. Und deshalb sieht Goldman Sachs umso mehr Chance für Rendite. Der größten Pizza-Kette der Welt fehlt Italien. Der größten Pizza-Kette der Welt fehlen die Fahrer. Das Geile: Der größten Pizza-Kette der Welt fehlen auch Milliarden an Börsenwert. Diesen Podcast der Podstars GmbH (Noah Leidinger) vom 16.08.2022, 3:00 Uhr stellt Dir die Trade Republic Bank GmbH zur Verfügung. Die Trade Republic Bank GmbH wird von der Bundesanstalt für Finanzaufsicht beaufsichtigt.

The body has a natural cellular recycling machinery known as the ubiquitin proteasome system that breaks down unwanted proteins. Kymera Therapeutics has developed a drug discovery platform that exploits this natural biologic process to target disease-causing proteins that had been previously considered undruggable using small molecule therapies. We spoke to Nello Mainolfi, co-founder, president, and CEO of Kymera, about the company's discovery platform, how it exploits a natural housecleaning mechanism within the body, and why this approach could enable the targeting of proteins that previously had been considered beyond the reach of small molecule therapies.

Subscribe to our Benzinga Crypto Youtube Channel Episode Summary:Chintai x Chimera Wealth InterviewMoon or Bust - To Play Moon or Bust go to https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrencyGuests:-Chintai is a Singapore-based company with offices in Germany that uses blockchain technology to modernize capital markets for asset managers, banks, and enterprises.-Chimera Wealth is a registered investment advisory (RIA) firm focused on empowering clients to enjoy their lives today while designing their tomorrow.Meet The Hosts:Logan RossBlockchain Analyst @ Benzinga | President @ Wolverine Blockchain | Crypto investor and educator since 2016https://twitter.com/logannrossRyan McNamaraBought sub $90 ETH during the bear market | Liquidated on ByBit | Was into DeFi before it was cool | Ran ASIC mining operation in 2016 (sorry planet Earth) | $UNI Bag Holderhttps://twitter.com/ryan15mcnamaraDisclaimer: All of the information, material, and/or content contained in this program is for informational purposes only. Investing in stocks, options, and futures is risky and not suitable for all investors. Please consult your own independent financial adviser before making any investment decisions.Check Out Other Benzinga Podcasts Here:Check Out All Benzinga Crypto News HereGet Moon or Bust Crypto Merch Here Join the Telegram: https://t.me/moonorbustBZ for 25% of Moon or Bust Podcast swag.Claim 1000 ZING airdrop: https://www.benzinga.com/zing Unedited Transcript:GM zinger nation. My name is Logan Ross, and I'd like to welcome you back to moon or bust your home for all things, altcoins and DFI. We've got a great show prepared for you today. Uh, but how you doing Ryan? What what's going on? Well, GM Logan happy Thursday and happy Monday to our view. Yes indeed. So before we can get started, I want to let you guys know about a couple of things we have down in the description below.So if you're here for crypto content, uh, we have a new Benzinga crypto channel that we're building out right now. It's the top link in the description below. Uh, and so make sure you get subscribed to that. If you're new to the Benzinga channel overall, make sure you subscribe to this channel that we're on right now.And while you're down there, take a second to smash the like button for us. Uh, Ryan, can you tell us a little about the, the Benzinga swag that we have. Yeah, we got a ton of Benzinga swag. We'd have some Mooner bus specific swag. You've probably seen Logan, or I wear that Eve hat. We have a Shiba Inu, had a Bitcoin hat.We've got some pretty cool shirts. So definitely check that out. And if you want a discount code, join the telegram and we'll toss you 25% off. You heard it there first, uh, and on that note, make sure to connect with us on Twitter. Send us a DM. We'd love to hear from you. Um, but yeah, let's just get right into the show notes for today.Uh, so without further ado, I would like to welcome AIJ and David to Mooner bust. How are you both doing today? Thanks for having me. Yup. Good to meet you. Yeah, pleasure is all ours. So let's just dive right into it. Um, David, you are the, the founder of the crypto project, chin tie, uh, and Asia you're coming from the investment side from Kymera wealth, uh, could starting with David, could you walk us through, you know, your background in crypto, how you found yourself, where you are.Yeah. I mean, my background, uh, maybe isn't that uncommon, but it's certainly different from probably a lot of people who are in the crypto space right now. Um, particularly this current generation just coming in. I, uh, found my way in via a 20 year career in financial services, working for banks and asset managers.And so I got to live through the 2008, nine financial crisis. Uh, from St seeing it from the very inside and, uh, and really got a sense of just how flawed the existing system was, um, that it really wasn't working for us generally. Um, and that, that led me to start looking in 20 15, 16 onwards to wards, uh, disruptive technologies that I could use allies to help, uh, improve prove the financial system in petite.Um, so that, that led me down that first, uh, crypto rabbit hole. You know, I started looking at Ethereum, uh, beyond Bitcoin and getting a sense of what was possible with small contracts and, and beyond. Um, but, but really then, uh, that's what led us to, uh, creating Gentiles, which is a digital asset platform for dynamic forms of issuance and market creation.And, and, uh, yeah, I mean, th the whole growth of the DFI sector over the last three years is a phenomenal, uh, illustration. I think of that potential. Awesome. An agent. Yeah. So I am a managing partner and chief investment officer of a registered investment advisory firm here in the United States. We're talking about my crypto expertise.Well, I dabbled, you know, right when it became a bit popular in 2017, uh, not gotten to extensively until actually I was introduced to David and what their project is over I and tie. Uh, that's where not only for my own. Personal portfolio, but also as a firm, we've started to do well a bit more into the space, especially with clients nowadays on both sides of the spectrum, whether you have the younger generation or those who are nearing retirement, really just looking to diversify their assets and portfolios through different areas.So, um, yeah, that's pretty much where my exposure came into this. Awesome mate, Jay, we're really happy to have both of you on here today. It's great to see both sides, uh, you know, both the builders and the investors. Uh, so we're going to get right into it. So, David, could you tell us what chin tie is from a very high.Yeah. From, from a very high level. Um, we actually started out, I guess, in the defy space before he got called defy, um, back in, in 2017, we decided we were going to build out a full on chain, uh, order management system and an exchange, and actually try a new concept, which was trading of the utility of. Um, in this case, we started off with network capacity and, and it was a great initial use case, although it didn't last that long.Um, but really once we actually spent all that time building that out, we started to realize the sheer amount of time and effort we'd spent issuing our own network, token, the checks. Um, uh, we, we did that post, the kind of ICO, boom, if you all recall back in 2017, and it was just around the time that the governments were starting to crack down on some of the scans that had had erupted throughout that period.And we're starting to make noises like this is actually a security and things, and that really scared off a business and the promise of mass adoption for a couple of years, um, during that period. But nonetheless, we. Did a full issuance of the checks token, uh, during that period. And we built an exchange and we realized the entire process of doing that was incredibly complex, um, and very, very challenging for anybody else who really wanted to follow in our footsteps.So it really, the moment you looked at every other project, though, they had a need by and large to issue some sort of. To deploy on a, on a secondary market and, uh, and have liquidity with it. And so that was the fundamental foundation, uh, underlying Gentile as a platform, which was to say we were going to provide a solution that would enable dynamic forms of issue and spit utility tokens, and NFTs write down.Um, securities real estate. Um, so, so we've pursued licensing out of Singapore to ensure that we'll be able to, uh, do that type of thing with a fully compliant, uh, framework as well. And, uh, and that that's a fundamental differentiator too, between what we're doing at anything else in, in that everything is operating, um, on a compliance control framework so that, uh, whenever you've got an asset that's, that's red needs to be red compliant and, and handle that way.It can have rules in place. Uh, while still interfacing, uh, long-term potentially with the defy system too. So we kind of, uh, tend to tend to describe it to two outsiders as we're building the regulatory bridge between traditional finance and defy, and we're going to enable that mass adoption curve. And so it's a, it's an exciting time because the networks, uh, about to launch next next month.And, uh, yeah, so we're delighted to have, uh, Comera wealth on board with us. Awesome. So AIG, I know Kymera wealth has a background in real estate. Could you tell me specifically what interested you in the chin type? Yeah. So before I forget, um, and we're, we're going to get into this later on. Uh, I do need to disclose that, uh, Kymera wealth, as well as myself and the partners do have an investment in shin, Thai, uh, as backers.So, uh, yeah, just have to disclose that out there. But yeah, what really interested us is, as I mentioned, we're coming from the traditional financial space, right? There's kind of two aspects. One of those is acting as a fiduciary for our clients, really trying to develop a portfolio that's in their best interests.And as we're getting into this even more complex economic environment, we're having to diversify our investments, not just from the traditional stocks, bonds mutual funds, right. But also in different. Classes. And that's where the digital asset space is growing, not just in popularity, but acting as a very beneficial, uh, diversification tool, regardless of if you believe.Bitcoin or what have you and the fundamentals of it. It is acting as a diversifier for client portfolios, and I'm not talking about going 100%. Right. Uh, you can do something as small as one or five. And then so yeah, I come here a wealth, not all the way we're doing that aspect. And that's really what attracted us to, uh, what the team that shouldn't ties really do.Providing that platform, but also the compliance and regulatory aspect. Uh, as I just mentioned earlier, right? I have to disclose that well, we're investors in shin Tai. And so our area is very heavily, regular. Especially following the global financial prices and it's for good things, it's for the protection of the investors.And so that's really what attracted us is. We're seeing a lot of these projects out there and the digital asset and the crypto space, you know, initial issuance and such, but nothing really. That's kind of providing that regulatory or compliance framework and all that. David of course, top more in depth. I don't want to steal any thunder from him, but.Uh, that's one component. And then the other side is yes. What we're working on on a private funding side. I can't give too much information, uh, but we do have some expertise in the real estate as well. Some of the venture capital area. So really partnering machine tie on providing that, uh, through this new asset class digital assets versus doing the traditional route of either bringing up a venture capital firm and only being able to.Give that exposure to accredited investors and more towards the retail investor, right. The general population. And again, everything we want to do is in a compliant regulatory mindset. So having project like shin type to partner with is just perfect for us. Aja. I'm curious to know, did you receive any pushback from your big investors, uh, for moving into the crypto space where any of them kind of spooked by it?Uh, and if so, how did you handle that? How did you explain it and did they come up. Yeah. So right now we haven't really gotten much pushback. Uh, I will say there are some clients that we have that, uh, it is a new space to them and really what we try to do. And this is an all aspects of how we deal with clients is really focused on the educational aspect.Right. What I've found is most. Portion is just the financial literacy, whether you're talking about crypto or anything, stocks, bonds, and it's really our job to educate our clients that, Hey, this is a digital assets, uh, that we're really looking into, whether it's Bitcoin, Ethereum, a platform like shin tie or something that we're trying to privately issue.Once you educate the client from my experience, it's a lot easier to get them to jump on board versus just saying, Hey, there's this hot trending? Token that's out there. I want to invest 10%. Right. Um, so that's really where we focus and we don't really typically get much pushback once we educate those clients on just informing them.It's great to hear. So, David, my next question is for you, which blockchain does chin use and what does your multi chain architecture look like? Ooh, what a technical question. I mean, before that, I have to say again, I'm somewhat sheltered and being, pushing your clients into.No, I wouldn't do that. No, no. I would say that might be wise from a long-term hold perspective, but who knows? So yeah, the underlying protocol. Um, so, um, one of the other lead investors in the round for us was Dijuan. The role team known for launching the ESI protocol. Um, however, um, we, we select start because it's highly scalable and configurable.Um, and although it's had a bit of an interesting, uh, I think period over the last two and a half years, uh, since the original, uh, wider public blockchain was launched, uh, it's actually been very well maintained during that period. And it's is, I think there's some encouraging signs in that wider ecosystem, but.What I generally look at now is what is the underlying linkage potential to multiple other protocols? And that's just a general demand. That's coming from all clients that we were talking to you. Now, they want to be able to have that flexibility to lest on the very best protocols and in the, in the best potential markets, or they want to be highly selective, maybe about what they do as well.So, as an example, if you were to spend all the time going through an issuing a security token and putting controls around the marketplace, Who's a participant and maybe you're putting in place mandatory KYC, AML anti-money laundering checks in there as well. And so on and so forth. Uh, you defeat the whole purpose.If you just decide you're going to go and list it on unit swap, for example, because at that moment you get the, the, the, one of the great aspects of defy, which is that it's decentralized in censorship resistant. But the problem with that too, is that at that point, frankly, you know, your securities could be going off and being used for money laundering or being sold.You know, a country where somebody maybe is blacklisted elsewhere out of the business environment, because. The links to terrorism or something. So from an issuer point of view, this is where the they're more interested in other compliance solutions too, and saying it will be great to have options to connect in.And so the good news there for us is that we've got a really strong partner. Um, the announcement will be going out soon. Which provides us conductivity full conductivity to about 30 different other blockchain protocols. And I think that's broadly the future that we're going to see, which reminds everybody.I think, of the whole, uh, you know, underlying protocols of the internet itself, which is no one really. What's some of the technical connectivity issues are, you know, w w we're talking right now across this, and I know it's very easy to get really passionate about some of the blockchain protocols, the layer one stuff, but actually they can intercommunicate increasingly well, and, and I think from an end user perspective, you can imagine log-ins, you're on the line of account.You see, you're asking. The fact that you might then go and choose to trade a sale on one exchange or another. And under the surface, it's actually transferring between those chains as part of that process really shouldn't matter to you. And that's broadly where we're moving towards, which is encouraging, I think.And it's a, it's, it's an exciting, uh, component we need to needed to collect a, we get over the line for achieving mass adoption. Yeah, I think that's a good take. Do you have any plans on integrating with Ethereum in the future? Uh, yes, we're, we're already able to connect to it. Um, so for example, uh, the checks token, uh, network token, uh, we had to be.Limited by the initial listings. Uh, we are about to push a hat with listings or a number of, uh, Ethereum based, uh, exchanges. And, uh, and it's such a rich ecosystem that even though it has obviously some evident flaws, people talk about like the gas fee issue and so on. It's it's got an incredible number of talented developers in that pushing out some really innovative models, uh, related to everything from, you know, insurance to lending.And I think it's that type of innovation, which is fantastic for the wider financial system, because it really, it gives ideas to the, the wider financial system on what's possible. Uh, even if you know, it is subsequent stage, we find that some regulatory controls maybe start to creep in from governments or, or maybe not.Um, but, uh, yeah, I, I personally love what they've been doing over the last two years on the device space on, on the Ethereum. Totally me too, for sure. Uh, can you give us an overview of the process it takes to tokenize a real-world asset on the blockchain? Yeah, it's actually really easy. So, so from, from the perspective of actually tokenizing anything, it's a much over-hyped, uh, process in that it really is, is relatively straightforward.So within our platform, for example, now we were on a life, uh, call, call with a client the other day where they, they set up the. Got registered and have configured in and tokenized and issued an asset within about five minutes. And it was live on the chain to their exact parameters and they were able to then deploy a secondary market and commence, active trading with other people.Now that, that is all well and good, but the problem is if you're doing that with anything, that's actually like a, like a security, for example, with, with controls that need to be placed around that. This is where regulatory compliance and this other more complex side kicks in. And that's really where, um, I would say.90% of the value app really kicks in because tokenization is, is inherently going to be something that we all have, uh, disposed increasingly. I mean, if you think about it with NFTs, what that's shown us is with things like open seas, anybody can issue a token, right? I mean, you guys could have, have a Benzinga token, right, right now in a variety of different forms and you could issue it out pretty fast.Um, so the same really does apply here, but where it comes, uh, becomes really relevant. Ensuring that all the underlying controls and rules are put in place so that you can not only then say you've issued a security token, but that it actually combined and be handled in exactly the same way as the security.And that's how we eventually moved to all of the financial system going digital, going to tokens and, uh, and all the associated benefits we'll get from that. And how does holding custody of these real world assets work? Uh, yeah, it's it. Can sorry, go on. Finish your question in the custody of the real world assets that are tokenized on the platform?Uh, well, in, in the case of the regulatory ones, we've actually signed partnerships with several. Local and international, um, digital asset custodial solution providers. Um, again, there, there are announcements that are going to be going out very soon, um, on that side of things. However, when you get to things like utility tokens, um, we absolutely could be custodians as well.I think it then becomes something of a network security issue generally. Um, so why should use as necessarily have to trust and throw, throw the dice with every single thing athletes are up to or particular. Uh, asset, it kind of generally makes sense that particularly when the, um, doing anything that involves cross chain, that there, that utilizing a provider who maybe has got aspects like insurance, um, and is a established player who's in type business is looking after your people, digital assets securely.Now that doesn't mean that they couldn't still take control. You know, put them in their own wallet and maintain the key, but there are points in time where you are going to want to hand that off to somebody in a secure way and know that yes, it's moving around the underlying defy system here, but, but we're generally comfortable with it.So where we were definitely very focused on partnering with firms of that kind of quality to ensure that our users have the maximum. Yeah, that's great to hear. It seems like custody is becoming more and more popular, which maybe the earliest adopters of crypto didn't always like, or, you know, see the need for.But I think, you know, to get some sort of mass adoption events, Retail won't even realize they're interacting with blockchain and we'll all be taken care of for them. Uh, w which is, you know, it's good for some people in certain applications, especially when there's there's high value assets at stake. Uh, so speaking of those high value assets, can you tell us, uh, what, what is the main type of asset that, that Shantae is focused on tokenizing?Um, and how is it bringing this type of asset to a new audience or a new market? Yeah, well, actually it's, it's entirely being client driven. So as an example, comment or wealth, um, I think, uh, agent, maybe you could speak to this, but I know, you know, for example, Definite interest in, in the fractionalization and tokenization of real estate, because it fundamentally disrupts an asset class like that and adds liquidity to, to an illiquid asset class for the first time, which is not to be underestimated, what a big deal that could be, but there's a variety of other things possible.Um, and if you think about a firm like Kymera wealth, that's. Got back potential. It really, to some extent it's almost imagination is to, to is one of the core limits as well as what their client base might be. But I'm just broadly curious what you would say to that one in terms of what you think that the primary asset classes will be served for you over the next three years beyond real estate.Yeah. So I mean, one of the things we've been exploring is of course, real estate, so tokenizing that aspect, and it's not just the physical real estate work, just mentioning it it's conversation, but also the forms of. Right. So if you actually look at financial markets, the bond market is a massive market.Of course you can probably second me on this. It's it's bigger than what we have is this. So that's an area where also looking at Kymera as well. Um, whether it's into the mortgage real estate space or just in and of itself, just from my experience in my network, talking to other individuals as well, some of these businesses, uh, I think debt will probably be one option.Ty's biggest players. Um, I know one who's doing. And I think David, I introduced them to you. I can't recall, but they're really looking at doing like a Def con reconsolidation right. And seeing if they can have somehow tokenize that there's other areas too. I think it's very interesting how innovative some of these entrepreneurs are being in regards to another one I had project I had run into is looking at doing the like solar energy credits and how that could somehow be tokenized to help incentivize individuals.I Kymera wealth. I would say our biggest area is, as I mentioned, the real estate space, uh, that just seems to be where a lot of our clientele is kind of driving us and part of our network and in house as well as, as I mentioned, the loan space for the private debt dealing area. Yeah. And actually an interesting, uh, illustration of, of how difficult this is, is, is to predict is that I would have never predicted for example, that AF first go live market next month would be a carbon.So, you know, I thought all expands would be real estate or it's bound to be securities or, or just the standard utility token. But no, it's actually the global carbon market is forecast, for example, to be, um, up to $50 trillion by 2050. Um, because obviously the, the, the issue related to. Um, climate change and so on.And just the general challenges of the amount of carbon being dumped into the atmosphere is whether or not people fully agree with all of, all of that. And it's a relevant, because there's wider global consensus on the need to remove it, the statistical test written. So actually there's a huge potential that.The global carbon market is a great example of why blockchain technology will gradually pervade and, uh, move into lots of other sectors beyond what we've seen so far, because it's a corrupt sector and the carbon credit market can be faked. And you can end up with stale credits being Retraded elsewhere, which is a great way of kind of saying, no one really can control this properly.And it becomes somewhat meaningless. Uh, You know, your audience are gonna get it better than anybody, uh, that blockchain and be able to link some carbon directly removed and then burn those tokens. When they've actually been consumed, say by government to offset that that's a perfect use case for blockchain.And so. If we've got that as our launch market, who knows actually what some of the other, you know, really big use cases out there will actually be. Um, I think it's, that's the exciting thing about digital assets is that it extends to really, almost anything in any way that we, we exchange value. Um, and that's, that's where it's going to be a fascinating one for us to watch how this evolves over the next one.I want to touch on the tokenization of real estate a little bit more. How does tokenizing real estate benefit retail investors? So say one is providing greater access. Uh, so I had mentioned earlier, right? In regards to tokenizing, not just real estate, but other areas where it's only privy to, for, to give you an example, there's a.Particular investments, basically a non-traded REIT, a real estate investment trust. Typically you have to have certain requirements that the investor meets, whether they're an accredited investor, meaning they have like a $1 million net worth or earn 200,000 a year. For the past two years, there are certain income requirements that.So tokenizing some of these real estate's whole physical assets can provide greater access to retail investors versus, you know, other areas of the market where they weren't privy to. And that's, again, that's one of the reasons why, as I kind of hear our wealth is really interested in this area of.Providing greater access on all these different areas, not just real estate, but those private companies who maybe want to tokenize their equity in some sort of form or fashion to give it to the people. And you're seeing that trend grow right. We have crowdfunding and stuff like that. They're even online platforms that have been doing these kinds of deals, just in a different method.And so it's greater access for me that I would say is the biggest factor, David. I'm not sure what you would like to have. Uh, yeah, no, I think I broadly agree with everything you've said. I mean, really fundamentally to, um, tokenization of real estate. Uh, it doesn't have the potential to, to, uh, unlock access to an asset class that a huge proportion of the population right now, the, the, the younger adult population or affects will be priced out of.We can argue whether or not it's actually a good time to do that, given that we're at cyclical, highs on everything. But, uh, outside of that, it's fundamentally. One of the few asset classes that has literally solid backing in terms of asset backing behind it. So it's fundamentally undervalued right now because of the liquidity issues and the, and the lack of access, uh, for, for many, to be able to trade in and out of it.So for me, I just look at it as a way that, uh, people will be able to fundamentally change how they interact with real estate. They'll, there'll be. Utilize it and dip in and out of it in the same way we do it securities, um, over time. But also over time, I think it's going to disrupt how we have all the financing aspects of, of, uh, of, of real estate as well.You know, that they'll, they'll come a time when the concept of a mortgage may end up becoming obsolete as we know it now, because there's the tokenized. I mean, if you can imagine owning a house, and this is looking ahead in the future of the potential of it, if you can tokenize it in, in sort of say a mil, a fraction of, uh, And each token, therefore is linked to one Millington of the property.Well, the underlying market, um, would be able to effectively you, you could borrow those tokens off the market, in the form of leasing and pay the holders. The equivalent of view you, the way you pay the bank right now. And, uh, and over time you acquire through some special permissions, more and more of those tokens off the market to do eventually on the house.If you want in such scenario. Now that's the type of mechanism that could come into play eventually as an alternative way of actually funding out something as simple as, uh, over some of these fundamental as a house. So. Um, yeah, I think it's not to be underestimated the potential of all of this. And again, it's really going to come down to a combination of the, the innovators coming out with these types of concepts and trying to deploy them.And obviously the regulators and governments globally getting comfortable with such, such a design as well. AJ you mentioned, uh, that you suspect real estate bonds, and that may be one of Shanghai's biggest, you know, uh, platforms or applications in the future. Um, could one of you speak to, uh, you know, a little bit, little bit more detail on how this might work?Well, I can talk about the mechanics of it. That's for sure. I mean, I definitely agree with AJS point that bonds is probably the. Biggest potential market of all digital assets. I mean, like it or not, there is a hell of a lot of debts watching around the world. And, uh, it's also fairly fundamental for the way that we, uh, we actually conduct different forms of, of, uh, commerce generally.As well. Um, and it's actually very important. It's not always about a thing. So as an example, um, there are ways that if you, if you're a company, for example, you don't want to necessarily sell equity in your company, just because you need to access to investment capital, the idea that you could far more cheaply access and issue your own kind of corporate bond to, uh, to token holders, uh, backed by, you know, various fundamentals that you've provided related to cash flow and so on, and then pay them off over two or three.And access that farm in a way that currently most small companies are priced out of as is the type of thing that's possible. I mean, even some, just a single use case like that is a huge deal. And, uh, so I do think that broadly it's going to be a big one, but as to how it mechanically works well, it's programmatically, not that dissimilar to the underlying permissions you have with things like a security, it's just the.Whereas with a security, you might have things like voting rights and dividends and that type of permissioning built in and actions. Uh, with bonds, you just have bond blind ones instead. So you have coupon payments and you have the underlying dates related to them and you'll have certain default criteria.And what typically can happen, um, in, in a variety of other scenarios. They just get programmed in and then they get handled. Um, and of course, if it's a digital bond, well then you're logically also going to have to apply a different set of compliant compliance rules as well. So they'll have to be in coded and built around that to ensure that the, the market operates in it in a legitimate manner too.But, um, yeah, other than that, it really is just one of another multitude of new digital asset classes. I think we're going to see in the, in the coming two or three. Yeah. The point you make about kind of requiring reporting of, of, uh, financial data and, you know, kind of putting on chain, the risk that's associated with certain bonds, I think is really interesting.Um, I I'm by no means an expert in the real estate sector. But like, I know that that's one of the big things that led to the financial crisis of 2007, 2008, was that the, the, the debt ratings or like the risk ratings on these bonds, uh, were completely fraudulent. And, you know, synthetic bonds were created with, with just like never-ending leverage and, and an entire market was made out of basically thin air.Right. Um, so. I see the huge need for this, uh, product and the service that you guys are providing with, with the regulation as well. Um, so maybe we could touch a little bit on the regulatory, uh, you know, position we find ourselves in, uh, across the world than in the us specifically. Um, what type of measures are you guys, you know, proactively taking to avoid security issues in the future?Well, certainly speaking from perspective because compliance is one of the biggest areas we're focused on. Uh, it's kind of not a problem. Uh, how, however insane and restrictive a set of regulations may be passed by any given, uh, government gloves, but really there's still a set of rules that we can encode and feed into the rules engine, the compliance engine and enforce.For example, at the most extreme level, we can enforce China's current rules on crypto, which is a complete ban and just simply block them from any utilization because you put mandatory KYC around the regulated markets. Right? And so there's a degree of that. That's not to say obviously, breaches couldn't take place, but you can do that now.Um, it, it, it depends really in terms of how complex and difficult the system maintain on how frequently they change the underlying rules. Um, Typically regulators publish them out in a consultation period and make updates. And they don't tend to rock the boat and change rules too dramatically, too fast because they need time to see how they're going to play out.And in terms of whether the intent behind the rule is actually what ends up playing out or not. Um, and just generally the way most regulators operate globally is, is through a kind of consultation. Um, a process with the underlying industry that they're operating and regulating. So, um, the, the, the, um, uh, a jurisdiction like Singapore is, is very, very high quality.I would argue it's, it's comparable with London and New York as a financial center. And it's really, I think, set itself now as the premier, uh, APAC, uh, financial hub for me, which is why we selected it as our HQ. They've also got an, a regulator that's treading an interesting line between trying to ensure that everything's done the right way, but still trying not to stifle innovation and therefore pass rules that enable that too.So from that perspective, um, you know, I find regulators like that very easy to work with. We can encode their rules and give them guidance. And feedback and help shape that process. I think when you get to the U S it's a slightly different case because the U S is it's got a lot of conflicting different perspectives, and obviously it's kind of federal too.So it's got different states with different perspectives as well. Um, That makes it more challenging from, from an operational perspective, I think. And, uh, you know, I, I would hope that the U S will gradually get to a point where it has a cohesive set of rules that, that everybody can understand that if you're like a level playing field, even if it's not the absolute best.Um, because right now, I think it's generally very challenging for a lot of the digital asset firms in the U S to, uh, to be able to not just meet every role, but, but also be able to be as competitive as some who are based on. Totally. And we saw that the sec went after, you know, swap for supporting tokenized stocks earlier this year.Do you guys have any plans on tokenizing stocks as well? Or are you going to stay away from that? I mean, it's not on our roadmap right now. Um, but there is absolutely nothing to stop. Um, you know, an existing exchange for example, but may, maybe does do all that as part of its business, um, leveraging our platform to deploy out a digital version of.Now, in fact, we, we certainly could in theory, do that, I suppose. Uh, I don't get that excited by the idea of tokenizing stock generally, because it's already fairly liquid, it's accessible and relatively cheap. I mean, you just need to look at the size of the equities market. And the average retail investor is in an able to trade in it almost as they ought to be more easily than they are with, with crypto right now.So from that perspective, I think you have to ask the question, well, why generally have certain. Stop tokens appeared as a, as a concept or one is to kind of prove that you don't just have to tie something like a stable coin to the U S dollar. For example, you actually can tie it to something as dynamic as a security.Um, but broadly is one. I do think that there is ideologically a very big group in the, in the crypto area who are generally, um, determined to try and completely upend and replace the financial system from the inside out. And. They are awesome in, in many ways, in terms of what they're looking to do, that the challenge with something like that is that if you just go out and flagrantly, ignore the regulators and just say, we're going to do that.And we're going to have no controls in place. No KYC, no transaction monitoring, no anti money laundering controls. Eventually they, you know, you can imagine a scenario where they turn around and say, well, we've analyzed all this chain activity and we can see direct flows of capital going back to . Um, and that's where, you know, the, the DFI system won't do itself any favors.So it, you know, I think there's ideologically some issues here between, uh, the, the pragmatic side, like ourselves who want to actually, you know, enable controls and mass adoption through that, and then gradually helping influence and change the system and allowing that disruptive technology to kind of do that as well.And then there's another group that just generally want to stick two fingers up the entire system and just deploy everything out regardless. But, yeah, I mean, you only have to look at the likes of finance for the, they actually issued stock tokens as well, and had to pull them quite rapidly to see that, you know, even an exchange like that with, with a level of parent influence, it has, was unable to withstand pressure from growth global regulators.So I think. What we're seeing with that level of innovation and experimentation is more likely to end up being adopted and pushed out by the rest of the financial system with some appropriate controls around that. Yeah. I was certainly two camps as far as like strict centralization and strict de-centralization for a long time.Uh, and this market cycle, we've seen a whole bunch of products pop up. They kind of embrace both sides and find some middle ground, uh, you know, with an acceptable level of decentralization for the application. So they've uh, could you talk about how decentralized exactly shouldn't have. Yeah. And, and I think we're a very good example of exactly that kind of a thing that's coming out.So, um, on network launch, we've made a conscious decision to operate on a permission chain, which is effectively a private chain, uh, at this stage. And the reason we've done that is because there are a lot of benefits to launching a network and a project of this nature. With, with centralization. Um, so having gone from the inside, out of a network, a blockchain network launched the, went for the full decentralized option.The problem is that decision-making is extremely challenging in those environments. And, and I would argue. Uh, decentralized governance is probably one of the big unsolved challenges for crypto over the next five years. It's something that still hasn't been necessarily mastered. We're still trying different types of governance models.Um, but the intent certainly for, since I longer-term, that is to actually decentralize our bus network and chain and govern. Working with the underlying users and clients to find a model that works for everybody. So one example of that could be that all the largest, uh, clients become no validators on that.And gradually, and obviously, um, take part in that or that you can end up with a proposal system related to how upgrades to the network and enhancements are made. That that becomes a vote based system. I mean, these, these are things that we see you're already operating on on other kinds of downtime structures.But that's that's, you know, certainly the longer-term vision, there will be a de-centralization of the network, um, fundamentally over time, but it needs to be done in a way that also the regulators generally are happy with it as well. Um, so for them, they may want to say, well, if you're going to wish you and, and do all of these regulated products, we still need to have some central point where we can effectively say you're accountable.And therefore, you know, we know who we're talking to because one of the big problems with dowels in general, Yeah. People then resigned from the whistle positions and no one's clear who, who actually runs it. And people have a habit thinking that means they're no longer, there's no liability risk. But of course, what actually happens is that the regulators can just go after anybody.Who's a public figure for that network could be the, the validators. It could be the, the governance people, or it could be the developers. And as soon as they apply pressure at that level, you, you realize that actually decentralization as a concept. Quite malleable. And once, uh, once all authorities put a degree of pressure on you, you can see these things actually.I'm not, not proving to be quite as resistant as perhaps when we first thought, do you think that this level of regulation is bad for innovation or causes capital flight? Uh, yeah. I mean, I definitely think that, uh, the smartest thing that broadly governments could do with the defensive. Um, it's only cracked down on, on areas where they can see absolute flagrant examples, um, that are, that are having a negative impact.So an example of that, they cracked down on the ICO. Boom. Now it was innovative, but with zero controls in place, we saw massive. People being ripped off access scams. We saw wine, we needed some, some rules in place to, to keep it open and honest. So that's an example that where I think fine, but, uh, when you're getting experimental token models, uh, trying out a variety of different things and the, the pace of innovation, if anything is accelerating to me, it's, it's not healthy to try and impose rules on something.Moving that fast. It's actually more interesting and probably wiser generally to step back and let it evolve. For say another couple of years. And then one, as it looks to be starting to mature and maybe problems that are more clearly identified, then you can start to actually put in place controls. Um, I do think that generally, if you over-regulate, you end up stifling innovation and so.I, I very much hope that the more light touch approach generally with regards to digital asset rent regulation is something that regulators globally continue to push for. And I think in many cases they are, but, uh, you do get some who, for example, can't even do something as basic as differentiate between a utility token and a security token.And when we're not doing that fast, a good adoptive stifling innovation couldn't agree more. Ryan. I think you have the next question here. Oh yeah. So how does single-sided liquidity provision work? Because it's, double-sided on stuff like unit swap, right? You're providing two assets with single sided.You're just providing one, correct? That's absolutely correct. Yeah. Um, so it's been, uh, something of a holy grail for a long time and different types of groups that have come from. Approaches to try and remove this concept of impermanent loss. So for those not familiar, when you act as a liquidity provider on something like Eunice, SWAT, you inject liquidity on both sides of the pool.So it could be, you know, let's say Bitcoin on one side and the, the uni token that it's paired to on the other side. Now the problem with that is as inherently, whichever way the market moves. Whether it goes one way or the other, you, you then suffer something called in permanent loss and it's, um, it's something that only then gets realized when you take you up a seat back end of the market, but you can end up in that loser to quite substantial amounts, um, in terms of what you end up getting.Without going into specifics as to why. And therefore, the only way that, that, that, that is generally handled is by paying very high amounts of the liquidity providers, which actually makes liquidity provision more expensive than it needs to be. Um, if you look at ways around this one example is insurance whereby um, collective groups will provide a degree of, uh, that they will take the impermanent loss when realized, but they will, um, broadly give you coverage for a certain.So that you, you've got a degree of certainty, you'll get back what you are that you're, you're going to accept that there's an inherent cost to that as well. Um, that is okay. But actual one side of the Quincy is possible. If you actually create an underlying, uh, automated market-making algorithm that can happen.Um, I won't go to the specifics of it, but we patented a, um, a mathematical algorithm we developed in house on that front. Um, and it checks out and broadly what that means is it introduces two concepts or, um, impermanent loss still exists as a possibility for LPs, but so there's a concept called impermanent game.And you can therefore, as a liquidity provider, Choose whether or not you could lock in an impermanent game and actually realize a gain or simply a loss, uh, and they will, they will do so in response to market conditions and, uh, things like the underlying rates being provided well, PS, um, it's going to add some interesting dynamics to that, but what that fundamentally means from a, you know, the perspective of define, for example, is that provided we get full interfacing.With our regulatory markets to define the future as well, which is that the long-term goal you'd be able to onboard your, your. Collateral from somewhere else in the defy system, the same way we move it around right now, you build to then inject liquidity into just one side of the protocol and you build to get that amount back out again as well, but you'd be able to effectively, you know, um, access additional yields, but what they should do, uh, is also broadly, uh, reduce the fees that actually, uh, LPs need to be paid because they're not taking as much risk anymore.Interesting. So this, uh, impermanent gain, it does not come from the. No, it comes from the movements of the, of the, of the market in the same way as impermanent loss does. So, um, you've got a given exchange rate, let's say between, uh, Bitcoin and the checks like an athlete, and then checks appreciates by a certain amount versus Bitcoin.And at that point, when you, you, as the LP, Um, so, so you've gone on the, uh, on the check side, you suffer or you, you get you, uh, having permanent game. If you've gone on the Bitcoin side, you'd, you'd have some internet loss in that example without the balance. Um, but likewise, it, it provides you with a way of actually making a decision as to whether or not you think that that movement in the market is law short term.And you can effectively as a, an LP participate in the market by making those decisions yourself and saying, I'm going to. Uh, our exposure, um, as a liquidity provider here, because I think actually this is just a short-term spike. So we're locking the impermanent, uh, gain hit, and then we'll, we'll actually inject more liquidity back then when we feel it's reached a more balanced level again.So these are interesting dynamics or what it will require instead is for higher rates to be paid, to maintain the depth of the pool. Now, uh, we're going to be quite interested to see how some of these dynamics play out, but, um, broadly it's, it's definitely uncharted territory in terms of. Uh, this is going to walk right across the market.Yeah, most definitely. And I don't want to dwell on this for too long, but I know this is a complicated topic. So I'd like to show a quick example on unit swap. So this is an LP position that I have, it's represented by an NFT, and you can see as providing liquidity between the east and Manoj pair, uh, of which my Manor was drained as it took off against Eve.Uh, and so I may have made $300 from fees, but I definitely lost money and missing out on all of the gains that men have made in the media. Um, yeah. So that is the kind of impermanent loss that we're referring to here. Yeah. That's a good example of, uh, well that one's also partly opportunity costs. So. It could be just even if you ignored, um, something like staking rewards and the fee side of things.If, if you get a movement in that market and then took it back out, you might end up with less money than you put in, in that scenario, for example. And that's another side to impermanent loss. Um, that is yeah. Generally going to be, you know, an interesting one. I think it's quite a complex area that the average defy user generally struggles to fully understand.And, uh, that in itself is kind of unhelpful because what people really want is a degree of certainty. They want to know that I'm putting in I'm contributing, say liquidity services, and therefore I'm going to get reasonably well paid for it. And I have some high degree of certainty as to what I'm going to get paid for it.They don't really want to sit there and go might work out really well. It could be a complete disaster for me. That's never really a, you know, a helpful model. And that's, I think, again, it shows points to the innovation of defy, but also the continued innovation as we're stopping. Try out different, uh, configurations that could enhance that further.Most definitely. So, uh, one of the big arguments I see long-term for the success of crypto and tokenization is purely for the sake of capital efficiencies alone. So could you talk about how you're able to reduce overhead by over 50% through digital asset issuance? Yeah, I mean, this, this is, um, I think reasonably well understood by a lot of the, uh, the defy community, but maybe not.Um, as somebody who's a more casual crypto user, who's, who's just dabbling. The different token markets, they probably don't fully appreciate the efficiency gains that come from blockchain generally. Um, because they, they won't necessarily understand the existing structure of the, the, uh, the current financial system.So if you think about every different, um, asset manager and bank global, To varying degrees, they are going to be operating their own internal systems. They're going to have their own, uh, teams that, that carry out different forms of, uh, checks. And they're going to have to reconcile that with anybody that they, who was a counterparty that they tried with on the markets, or if they're going through a broker, they're still going to have to go through that same underlying process.So if you, if you think about what that sucks up in terms of time, energy jobs, resources, It's actually astronomical. I mean, we're talking hundreds of thousands, probably millions of white collar jobs, which are means people earning well over a hundred thousand dollars a year. And their job is to check data and to make up for the inefficiencies of the fact that we're all sitting around with lots of different computer systems, arguing over what the positions are on databases that can be corrupted and not reflect properly.Now, you know, a distributed database, I a block. That sits in the central event, on my process, dramatically lows, all of those costs and adds massive efficiency. So really, um, the best estimates are from the likes of Accenture, um, are that between 50 and 70% of the back office, which is the side that handle all of these reconciliation of positions and settlement can be completely removed out of the global financial system by, uh, embracing blockchain.So that is probably why we're also seeing some. Substantial, um, adoption, uh, and the interest in adoption amongst financial institutions, even though they're not participating with us yet in the don't defy side, they can see the underlying potential for them just to shoo this into their existing, um, structures in a, in a more efficient way.Yeah. And I can second that just coming from a financial services firm, right. We have to do audits third party audits. And the maternal or the partners, and I do the accounting. So having this kind of platform where it'll speed up the process, not only saved time and hours with what we prepare ourselves or an associate, but also just having a trusted, full blockchain in this scenario.Sorry, one thing I was thinking that there is an interesting, other perspective on this, which from a regulator perspective too, they don't really know what the hell is going on in the financial system. So they're relying on people sending them reports and, and, you know, data dumps of their positions. And then they sort of retroactively may analyze it, or may not.If you think about a blockchain though, where they have site permissioned access and can see. And it's the central golden source of truth throughout the trade life cycle for a given market. It gives them a very powerful position because they can get instant preemptive reporting. They can keep a very close eye on things and they don't need to go back.And I'll say AGA and Carnera wealth to send things through. They can just generate it themselves and look at it themselves too. And that I think is a fundamental change in how regulators are gonna be able to, um, interact in, in the system. So on a kind of related tangent, we see these automations in blockchain, these automations in AI machine learning self-driving cars self-driving or not self-driving, but you know, you see these checkout kiosks at McDonald's there's no longer like the people needed a and the greater trend towards automation.Uh, a lot of people think that this presents, uh, an issue. Um, but there's also the counter. That there may be metaverse jobs opening up to replace these. And I've heard people like Gary V say the potentially long-term, uh, there could be more jobs in the metaverse than in the real world. Do you guys see this as a possible outcome?What do you think? I mean, if time has shown us anything, I think when we have innovative technology, Right. It's really just coming down to adoption. Right? As we have things that are automating, that take a factories right now, we're training those who had those industrial jobs into other aspects of our society.Whether it's going to be metaverse is going to take place more than the physical that I don't know, maybe David, you can provide some clarity there, but I think in the long run it all, just come to where we adopt as a system. Yeah. I mean, my perspective on it broadly is that nothing that Facebook now called Matta, that what they presented was original, um, or hasn't already been largely put together in different forms by the VR community already, um, on a, on a variety of levels.So even the concept of LFTs, although are tokenization digital assets of existing. In gaming environments, um, with some quite high value secondary markets for a long time, as well, as well as skins and other things like that. Now, um, the, the, the question is how can it actually fundamentally disrupt how we, we engage with each other, particularly in a remote world, you know?Um, and, and I'm definitely bought into that idea. We could, you know, my team is, is located primarily in Germany and Singapore, and I'm on the east coast of the U S the idea that I can actually sit in a virtual office space with them for meetings, where we actually feel like we're, we're in the presence of one another and just engage in a much more, uh, dynamic way than we are right now with four squares on, on a, on a little screen staring at it.Um, that definitely appeals to me. And I think it will appeal to a lot of other. And probably the way therefore the will be able to interact, not just in business, but other forms of, uh, um, sports and other things too. It could feed into those two for sure. And certainly gaming is a given. Um, so I think that personally, therefore it will overtake the real world from a commerce perspective, undoubtedly, um, because you'll be able to do things more efficient.In that environment too, you won't be constrained by physics and other aspects of it. Um, and, and therefore, I think we will see a point where people prefer doing business in, in that metaverse concept. Um, but the real world is not going to lose its place. Right. I mean, we're, we're still gonna want to get out and walk on the beach and get fresh air and need to look out for our health and sunshine.And frankly, No, no, no. My back a few beers, virtual beer doesn't sound as good to me as real. So, you know, I think that you, people have to be realistic about this. There has to be, uh, you know, just like we say, there has to be work life balance that will have to be met a real real-world balance. I think, uh, in that, in that future too.And people will realize that it's not healthy to just sit there and one is in front of a screen all day. Um, but yeah, I, I think broadly it has the potential to fundamentally disrupt, um, You know, crypto itself will form the under arching backbone that enables the, of that to function. Certainly a crazy world and metaverse that we live in right now.Um, I know that we are getting close to running out of time. Uh, so I wanna thank you, both David and AIG for stopping by today. Um, but before we wrap it up, I'd just like to give you both the chance. If there's anything else you want to mention, let the people know where to connect with you, where to follow along with, with your respective, uh, projects.The floor is yours. Yeah, I'll go first and then I'll let you close. But, uh, yeah, if anyone wants to contact me, my email is aij@kymerawealthdotcomoryoucanvisitourwebsiteinmarijuana.com. All I would say is just as an investor perspective, right? Always conduct your due diligence. We were joking about me and coins and stuff like that.Um, from the perspective of a financial services, I definitely agree that we are getting to a point where, especially in the United States into a transitionary period, Crypto or digital assets will be massively adoptive. Uh, I don't know how that will look like. Um, luckily not one of those people that makes the rules, but I think we are getting into that position.So a platform like shin Tai, those firms like Conger wealth, um, and those individuals who are trying to be innovative to have. Provide greater access. How I mentioned earlier to the retail investor, whether it is tokenized assets of real estate or debt issuance, another form of equity, um, just always conduct your due diligence.Uh, whether you talk with a financial advisor like us, or just hit Reddit as much as possible to find that information. Yeah. And from our side, um, you can follow us on Twitter app, chin time network. Um, and we're also on telegram with that same handle actions I network. Um, but yeah, I think for anybody in, in the crypto space, who's interested in mass adoption and wants to see where the regulatory compliant, digital assets side.So things like where tokenized real estate. And securities and funds and other types of bonds and those types of products, if they want to follow and see that starting to actually emerge in real, tangible, blockchain based markets, give us a follow. Um, and likewise, if the passionate about it as we are about this idea of bridging between defy and.You know, um, the underline checks token is going to play a core role to that. Then again, um, I encourage them to come and join the community and, um, we are definitely going to be having an interesting six to 12 months. So, uh, we hope to see more of your all right. Thank you guys. Both so much great talking with you.We'd love to have you back on in the future. Um, but yeah, that's it. Thanks guys. Thank you.Alrighty, Ryan, that is it for this episode of moon or bust. I thought that was one of our best conversations ever on the show. I know you're personally really interested in real estate. Uh, so what did you think about that? Yeah, I thought it was so cool. And there's so many far reaching ideas that they brought up with tokenization of real estate and bonds.It reminded me of radical markets. I know we've both read that book and I need to read it again. Now after this interview, most definitely. If you guys tuned in after the start, we want to point out the Benzinga crypto channel top link in the description below. If you're new, around Benzinga or moon or bust, I'd like to say welcome, uh, and make sure you're subscribed to the main channel and also smash the like button while you're down there.Um, but that's all we have for you today. Ryan, do you have any closing thoughts for. You know what I'm about to say, what follow you on Twitter? Check me out on Twitter. I still don't have as many followers as Logan. It's cause I'm cooler than you, man. It's that simple, I guess. Oh, well you do have a Bitcoin license plate though.So that's gotta be where it's something. Hopefully one day. Maybe one day. Alright, that's enough. Let's get out of here. All right. Visa guys.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/moon-or-bust/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

-News -Challenges -Item Shop -Tip of the Day Support-A-Creator - mmmikie Support Daily Fortnite - anchor.fm/daily-fortnite/support Twitch - www.twitch.tv/mmmikedaddy YouTube - www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEJ4F24Xq8aNQRyI3FWhOg Twitter - twitter.com/MMMikeDaddy Instagram - instagram.com/mmmikedaddy/ Discord Server - discord.gg/qugJAVp Merch - https://shop.spreadshirt.com/mmmikedaddy Facebook - fb.me/mmmikedaddy email - mmmthatsgoodstuffgaming@gmail.com Epic - MMMikeDaddy PS4 - MagnificantMikie Daily Fortnite - itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/daily-fortnite/id1366304985 The goal of Daily Fortnite is to build a positive community of Fortnite players so we can all enhance our enjoyment of Fortnite together. I want to hear your tips, tricks and stories too! So use the Anchor app to call the show and leave a message and you might be featured on the show! Remember to rate, review, subscribe, and like to help grow the show and the community! And as always, have fun be safe, and Don't Get Lost in the Storm! --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/daily-fortnite/support

In Season 7 von Fortnite Battle Royale sind jede Woche neue Alien-Artefakte auf der Karte versteckt. Diese benötigt ihr, um euren Kymera ganz nach euren Vorstellungen anzupassen. Deshalb zeigen wir euch jede Woche alle Fundorte.

Welcome back!Matt (Twitter) and Michael OneTwenty (Instagram ) interview Kymera Korpse (Spotify) a southern edm-rap group that has a deep and invested love for all things Black and anime related. We talk Japan anime, music, and how looking at other cultures makes you look at your own. We play and react to “Alligator” by Kymera Korpse.Other than that, we talk about how Michael experienced very weird racism in Okinawa, how lockdowns end and then start again, and theorize about what the Olympics would look like if (OR WHEN?!) they were held on ZOOM, which may or may not be a Chinese surveillance tool used on so many of the world’s corporations.JAPAN WUT? Streaming here, there, and everywhere:★Get it iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/jp/podcast/japan-wut-podcast/id1489848400?l=en ★Get it Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/77v5NR6YqKw7DizDA1jOMj ★Get it Official Site: www.matthewpmbigelow.com ★Get it RSS: http://www.matthewpmbigelow.com/?format=rss We love it when you share. And Subscribe. New art every week!#Tokyo #Podcast #Japan #Culture

En el episodio de hoy con Ramiro Villacreces hablamos de la medicina ancestral, los enteógenos y las ceremonias shamánicas.

I talk with two members of the comics collective, Kymera, about what's it's like to be part of a comics crew, and how that camaraderie pushes them creatively.

Graphic novelist and founder of Kymera Press Debbie Lynn Smith discusses her transition from novelist, to writing for Television, to graphic novelist, how she manages the global team at Kymera, her recent deal with The Smithsonian and more.  Learn more about Kymera Press here! Don’t forget to subscribe to the Write On podcast on iTunes!       

Growing up in the Napa area, Jason Woods always had a knack for putting things together and taking them apart. For his senior project in high school Jason successfully entered and competed in the original "BattleBots" on Comedy Central where contestants needed to engineer and build robots from scratch. He later invented the Kymera Body Board where he his the CEO today. In this episode we discuss his experience participating in BattleBots (4:00), why he decided to skip college (7:00), the first Kymera prototype (18:00), Kymera Body Board being voted invention of the year in Popular Science Magazine (19:30), his first "failed" appearance on Shark Tank (21:00), succeeding on Shark Tank the second time around (36:00), and the challenges with a seasonal product (41:30).

En esta edición 36 vamos a irnos hasta Bilbao pues en el espectacular palacio Euskalduna de la capital vasca se

  Garnet Schulhauser is a retired lawyer who lives near Victoria, on Vancouver Island, with his wife, Cathy, and little dog, Abby. He grew up on a small farm in Saskatchewan and moved to Cal- gary, Canada, after law school where he practiced corporate law for over thirty years with two blue -chip law firms. After retiring from his law firm in 2008, he began his new career as an author and his first book, Dancing on a Stamp, was published in 2012. Since the release of his first book, Garnet has been active with book signing tours and speaking engagements and has been a frequent guest on radio talk shows. When he is not writing or connecting with his followers, Garnet enjoys golfing, nature walks in the forest with Abby, and family gatherings with his sons, Blake and Colin, and their partners, Lauren and Bergis, and granddaughter Kymera.   Since publishing his first book “Dancing on a Stamp”, Garnet has published three other books: “Dancing Forever with Spirit”, “Dance of Heavenly Bliss” and his latest book: “Dance of Eternal Rapture”.  This will be Garnets third appearance on our show Beyond the Gate. Website: www.garnetschulhauser.com    Email: contact@garnetschulhauser.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DancingOnAStamp YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/GarnetSchulhauser Twitter: https://twitter.com/@GSchulhauser

Encompassing the true essence of what Inner Symphony stands for, Soul Button spawns #007 and endows us with another heavenly podcast. Inciting moments of audio intoxication that will send you to the edge of deep house exhilaration and back again, #007 can be heard, felt and wholly consumed.  Capturing angelic melodies, rousing vocals and those ever present rolling basslines, this podcast is a brilliant interlude, depicting the soundtrack of Soul Button’s heart. Artist names such as Maceo Plex & Gabriel Ananda, Solee, Whomi, and Rampue grace the track listing for #007. Animal Picnic & Aaryon’s ‘Kymera’ can also be heard, along with Soul Button’s upcoming remix of ‘Fairy Tales’. https://soundcloud.com/inner-symphony

Encompassing the true essence of what Inner Symphony stands for, Soul Button spawns #007 and endows us with another heavenly podcast. Inciting moments of audio intoxication that will send you to the edge of deep house exhilaration and back again, #007 can be heard, felt and wholly consumed.  Capturing angelic melodies, rousing vocals and those ever present rolling basslines, this podcast is a brilliant interlude, depicting the soundtrack of Soul Button’s heart. Artist names such as Maceo Plex & Gabriel Ananda, Solee, Whomi, and Rampue grace the track listing for #007. Animal Picnic & Aaryon’s ‘Kymera’ can also be heard, along with Soul Button’s upcoming remix of ‘Fairy Tales’. https://soundcloud.com/inner-symphony

Join Anna K. as she interviews guests weekly about what makes them GLOW...inside and out!  Every Friday, 10am EST.  Join Anna as she interviews author, Garnet Schulhauser, this week! Garnet is a retired lawyer who lives near Victoria, on Vancouver Island, with his wife, Cathy, and little dog, Abby. He grew up on a small farm in Saskatchewan and moved to Calgary, Canada, after law school where he practiced corporate law for over thirty years with two blue-chip law firms. After retiring from his law firm in 2008, he began his new career as an author and his first book, Dancing on a Stamp, was published in 2012. Since the release of his first book, Garnet has been active with book signing tours and speaking engagements and has been a frequent guest on radio talk shows. When he is not writing or connecting with his followers, Garnet enjoys golfing, nature walks in the forest with Abby, and family gatherings with his sons, Blake and Colin, and their partners, Lauren and Bergis, and granddaughter Kymera. In Dancing on a Stamp, Garnet recounts how his life changed dramatically one day in 2007 (while still practicing law) when he was confronted on the street by a homeless man named Albert (who was actually a wise spirit in disguise) who revealed startling new revelations about our soul journey on Earth and the afterlife that awaits us. Albert's revelations were inspiring, uplifting, and comforting, and flew in the face of almost everything that Christian holy men had been preaching for centuries. He wrote Dancing on a Stamp at Albert's request so that these revelations would be available to everyone.  

A.k.a. Baggio Kymera started in music at a young age, his family influences are classical music, new age like Enya. Eventually developing a taste for uplifting trance which took him through the branches to hard trance and tech-trance, finding in these what will be the foundation for his musical career. Then enter your life genres like techno house electro house and Punk, who come and take him his mail mixed development At that time with a good friend in a bar in Manizales (Colombia) learn basic mixing techniques After study and musical experience led him to explore various rhythms in search of natural sound, playing various genres from techno to trance one gender fastest electronic music, and definitely focus on the main rhythm and trance as hosting several subgenres to create a fun and dynamic set strong. He began his musical studies by 2009 musical school Deejay Academy where he took classes in professional mixing each implement mixing from vinyl to CD. Djs: He has shared the stage with the great majority of the country's most representative djs like: Fuad, gartek Dj Mara, Jimmy Neira, Danny Diaco, juan track, Gianni Ruocco, mikelangelos Project, dash, bastian led, among others. Since then participating in music production with Project and Christian C mikelangelos musical producers with which since 2012 is in the production project progresive house with Dimitry Livanof nickname and accompanied seals (revenge records) and (neurotikal records) to date.

Hold on go your hats. We are are going on a trip that will stretch your imagination - to a section of New York City called Golgotham, which has been set aside for a non-human species called Kymera. They have six fingers and magical powers and they are threatened by human interlopers. It is a wild ride and our driver will be Nancy Collins author of "Left Hand Magic" next.

Ultrabooks were the big thing at CES in January this week I talk to DELL about the XPS 13 which i've been using and like! Your calls this week range from iPhone issues, to Buying an APple at JB HIFI, Kymera Wand for TV control by Harry Potter fans, Digital Radio for a first time user, and changing mobile plans...

Ultrabooks were the big thing at CES in January this week I talk to DELL about the XPS 13 which i've been using and like! Your calls this week range from iPhone issues, to Buying an APple at JB HIFI, Kymera Wand for TV control by Harry Potter fans, Digital Radio for a first time user, and changing mobile plans...