Podcasts about Calorie

What if you could build a full-stack app just by chatting with friends? In this episode, I talk to Coop, founder of Nullshot, a groundbreaking platform merging AI, Web3, and social collaboration. From his early days buying Bitcoin in 2012 to building a multi-million dollar Web3 game studio, Coop shares how he's now creating the future of app development—faster, cheaper, and more collaborative than ever. We dive into how Nullshot lets strangers build apps together, remix each other's work, and even co-own projects through a DAO.We also get real about the current state of AI agents, the shift from individual to community innovation, and why memes and video shorts might just be the next frontier in AI-driven creativity.

At first glance, it may seem like the relentless pursuit of targets and numbers in sales has little in common with the discipline of physical fitness. But in this episode of the Sales Reinvented podcast, we peel back the layers to reveal just how intertwined the two really are. Drawing on years of experience in both revenue leadership and personal training, Charles Needham breaks down how simple wellness habits can "uncover alpha in overlooked data" and prepare sales professionals for the daily stresses of the job. Charles shares practical, science-backed advice on how simple habits, like daily walking and manageable routines, can yield massive benefits in focus, resilience, and stress management for salespeople. Whether you're struggling to prioritize fitness amidst a hectic sales schedule or looking for ways to optimize your energy and motivation, this episode is packed with actionable insights to help you thrive both in and out of the office. Outline of This Episode [00:00] Key connections between fitness, focus, and sales success. [06:21] Physical health and stress resilience. [09:21] Meditation for high performers. [12:18] Start with awareness and baselines. [15:18] Stress management through perspective. [17:26] Morning routine and discipline. Fitness is Relative Just as a football lineman prepares for an entirely different set of challenges than a sprinter, salespeople must identify which habits best suit the demands of their particular role. The principle remains: "Fitness is a means of intentionally putting stress in our system such that we have adaptations that then facilitate a higher quality of life." For sales professionals, this means using physical activity not just to build muscle, but also to improve resilience in the face of workplace challenges. Low-Cost, High-Reward Habits for Sales Pros A common objection among salespeople is a lack of time or expensive gym memberships, but Charles offers practical solutions. His top wellness practices include: Walking 10,000 steps a day: This accessible habit offers a slew of benefits, fat loss, cardiovascular health, and increased mental clarity, with almost zero monetary or logistical cost. Regular resistance training: Building muscle not only improves physique but is linked with lower stress hormones and better overall motivation. Calorie control: A manageable diet provides consistent energy, sharper focus, and helps avoid the afternoon energy crashes that can sabotage a pitch or negotiation. These simple changes can get you 90% of the way to all the benefits you could achieve at a very low percentage of the associated costs. Turning Stress into Strength Physical health is more than aesthetics; at its core, it's about your body's ability to adapt to and handle stress. Charles spotlights key biomarkers, like a low resting heart rate, as indicators of resilience. He believes that the definition of good physical health is actually the ability to manage stress, maintain motivation, and sustain high levels of performance. Small, consistent behaviors such as daily walks, adequate water intake, and smart sleep shape a positive feedback loop. These build the biological and psychological "muscle" needed to power through fatigue and burnout. Overcoming All-or-Nothing Thinking One of the biggest pitfalls for sales professionals is trying to overhaul their lives overnight, think extreme diet plans, intense workout challenges like "75 Hard," or marathon training as a weight-loss shortcut. Taking the things that are the easiest to do, making those things consistent, and then building on those things is far more effective and sustainable in the long run. Consistency and self-awareness are fundamental. Before making changes, salespeople are encouraged to track key health metrics, daily weigh-ins, food intake, and activity. After all, you can't manage what you don't measure. Starting with a baseline allows for incremental, science-driven adjustments, ensuring results while avoiding overwhelm and burnout. The Power of Morning Routines and Willful Stress By "front-loading" your day with intentional, controlled stress, you boost your capacity to handle whatever challenges arise. This strategic mindset, deferring short-term comfort for long-term growth, is a fundamental hallmark of humanity. Salespeople trade health for wealth at their own peril. Building resilience, energy, and focus through small, manageable fitness habits is not just about self-care; it's a foundational element of professional excellence.  Connect with Charles Needham Charles Needham on LinkedIn  Connect With Paul Watts  LinkedIn Twitter  Subscribe to SALES REINVENTED Audio Production and Show notes by PODCAST FAST TRACK https://www.podcastfasttrack.com

Today, I'm joined by a lineup of trailblazers in the science of longevity: Ben Azadi, Dr. Teo Soleymani, Dr. Carrie Jones, Ian White, Dr. Robert Lufkin, and Dr. Jenn Simmons . Together we dig into some of the most persistent myths and cutting-edge research shaping how we age—including why "eat less, move more" misses the mark, what really causes skin cancers, breast cancer screening risks, and the often-overlooked ripple effects of perimenopause.   Links to full episodes: #333: Keto Myths, Carb Days, and Why Calories Don't Count | Ben Azadi on Breaking the Weight Loss Cycle Episode 338: How the Sun ACTUALLY Impacts Skin Aging and Cancer Risk: Skin Cancer Controversies, Sun Safety Secrets, and Anti-Aging Breakthroughs With Teo Soleymani, MD Episode 376: Survival Tips for Perimenopause, NEW At-Home Hormone Testing & Bioidentical Myths With Dr. Carrie Jones Episode 350: Nature's Longevity CODE Revealed: Exosomes, Plasma HACKS & the Real Science of Aging | With Dr. Ian White Episode 318: Lies He Taught In Medical School: The METABOLIC Secret To Reversing Chronic Disease with Dr. Robert Lufkin Episode 300: Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis, Mammogram Myths, The REAL Risks For Women And Bold NEW Alternatives With Dr. Jenn Simmons   Episode Timestamps: Welcome & podcast overview ... 00:00:00 Longevity habits handout & sponsor plug ... 00:00:48 Clean protein choices & contamination risks ... 00:01:25 Calorie focus vs. hormones in weight loss ... 00:02:42 Why calories in/calories out fails ... 00:03:27 Cellular inflammation & gut microbiome in weight ... 00:04:43 Healthy, flexible metabolism over fast metabolism ... 00:07:51 Sun exposure, genetics & skin cancer ... 00:08:02 Sunscreen myths & ingredient safety ... 00:11:47 Perimenopause symptoms beyond hot flashes ... 00:12:27 Hormone replenishment: lifestyle + medical strategies ... 00:15:35 Breaking menopause myths & self-education ... 00:19:05 Blood factors & parabiosis in aging ... 00:21:37 Plasma exchange — practical and scientific updates ... 00:26:01 Western medicine vs. chronic disease reality ... 00:28:07 Breast cancer screening & over-treatment concerns ... 00:33:16 Hormone therapy after menopause—timing & benefits ... 00:37:07   Our Amazing Sponsors: PW1 protein powder is third-party tested for more than 200 contaminants, and Puori was the only brand that earned the Clean Label Project Transparency Certificate. That level of disclosure is rare. And refreshing. If you want protein that supports your goals — without the guesswork — go to Puori.com/NAT and use code NAT for 32% off your first subscription or 20% off anything on the site. Manukora - Now in NEW Glass Jars - This isn't regular honey. Manukora's bees collect nectar from the Manuka tea tree, which packs 3x more antioxidants and prebiotics than normal honey. Plus it naturally contains MGO, that rare antibacterial compound. Head to MANUKORA.com/NAT to save up to 31% plus get $25 worth of free gifts with the Starter Kit.   Nat's Links:  YouTube Channel Join My Membership Community Sign up for My Newsletter  Instagram  Facebook Group

REGISTRATION CLOSES SUN, JAN 4· Three Pillars Method Accelerator - ⁠Sign up here⁠· Three Pillars Method Masterclass for Coaches - ⁠Sign up here⁠---We're discussing the accuracy of calorie trackers and how they influence your understanding of caloric needs. You'll gain insights into how these tools often provide misleading estimates and learn a more intuitive approach to managing your diet based on your weight and intake.

If you're not losing weight, dangerous diet advice may be the reason. Discover the worst weight loss mistakes and how to lose weight fast with these 13 effective weight loss tips.0:00 Introduction: weight loss lies1:01 The worst weight loss advice 1:49 Low-calorie diets2:30 Weight loss mistakes6:01 13 weight loss tips14:08 Periodic prolonged fasting to lose weight fast Surprisingly, the most common weight loss tips given by mainstream dietitians and medical professionals are the worst diet advice! Calorie counting and portion control will leave you feeling hungry and constantly craving carbs. The body adapts to a low-calorie diet, leading to a slower metabolism. A low-calorie, high-carbohydrate diet raises insulin levels.I'm sure you've heard these other bad weight loss tips: • Eat 6 small meals per day• Count calories• Increase fiber• Drink more water to help you feel full• Chew gum• Take Ozempic These tips will not boost fat loss!Your body can use fat or glucose for fuel. Although stored fat is potential energy, you must lower your insulin to utilize it.Insulin resistance is at the root of many chronic illnesses and can negatively affect the liver, nervous system, immune system, and more. Low-calorie diets that don't lower insulin are not sustainable. You won't be able to achieve your goals if you're hungry, craving carbs, dealing with brain fog, high blood pressure, or other related issues. If you really want to lose weight, stop calorie counting! Try these 13 weight loss tips instead:1 Don't use pre-workout, sugary drinks, or protein bars.2. Keep your carbs at around 10 to 20 grams per day.3. No bright lights at night. 4. Get early morning sun.5. Avoid late-night snacking. 6. Never buy junk food at the grocery store. Don't shop while hungry!7. Be cautious around social situations.8. Walk after meals.9. Don't eat unless you're hungry.10. Prioritize healthy animal protein.11. Consume apple cider vinegar before meals.12. Avoid diets that keep you bloated.13. Do periodic prolonged fasting. Dr. Eric Berg DC Bio:Dr. Berg, age 60, is a chiropractor who specializes in Healthy Ketosis & Intermittent Fasting. He is the Director of Dr. Berg Nutritionals and author of the best-selling book The Healthy Keto Plan. He no longer practices, but focuses on health education through social media.Disclaimer: Dr. Eric Berg received his Doctor of Chiropractic degree from Palmer College of Chiropractic in 1988. His use of “doctor” or “Dr.” in relation to himself solely refers to that degree. Dr. Berg is a licensed chiropractor in Virginia, California, and Louisiana, but he no longer practices chiropractic in any state and does not see patients, so he can focus on educating people as a full-time activity, yet he maintains an active license. This video is for general informational purposes only. It should not be used to self-diagnose, and it is not a substitute for a medical exam, cure, treatment, diagnosis, prescription, or recommendation. It does not create a doctor-patient relationship between Dr. Berg and you. You should not make any change in your health regimen or diet before first consulting a physician and obtaining a medical exam, diagnosis, and recommendation. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.

Get personalized AI-powered coaching that identifies your exact fat loss plateau and gives you the specific fix you need. Try Fitness Lab (20% off through January 2nd) at:https://witsandweights.com/app--You cannot be in a true calorie deficit and still not lose weight. It's physiologically impossible.If you're eating less than you're burning but fat loss is not happening, something's disconnected between what you think is true and what's actually happening in your body.Discover the 3 possible reasons behind every "I can't lose weight" plateau and how to identify which one you're in.Plus, get a simple calorie strategy that lets you enjoy weekends without sabotaging your fat loss.Stop guessing and finally understand what's really holding you back so you can make consistent progress toward your body composition goals.Episode Resources:Try Fitness Lab (20% off through January 2nd)Episode mentioned: How the "Weekend Diet" Accelerates Fat Loss and Preserves More Muscle (Strategic Refeeds)Timestamps:0:00 - Why being in a deficit but not losing weight is impossible 4:31 - Reason #1: Tracking accuracy and measurement errors 14:00 - Reason #2: Water retention and body recomp masking fat loss 21:00 - Reason #3: Your deficit disappears after metabolic adaptation 24:28 - Bonus: The simple calorie strategy for weekend flexibilitySupport the show

Steve Hall is a WNBF Natural Pro Bodybuilder and one of the most trusted evidence-based voices in muscle building. As the host of the Revive Stronger podcast and a long-time practitioner, Steve brings rare clarity and nuance to topics that are often oversimplified online.In this episode, Steve joins Andrew to break down what actually matters for hypertrophy when it comes to rest periods, fatigue, technique, and calorie surplus - without dogma, fear-mongering, or rigid rules.Steve shares insight on:• Whether there is an ideal approach to rest breaks between sets• How much calorie surplus is actually needed to build muscle effectively• Why autoregulation is a powerful strategy for managing rest periods• Whether shorter rest breaks hurt progress when time is limited• Practical tactics to make shorter workouts more effective• How fatigue influences strength and hypertrophy outcomes• Why Steve has become less rigid about “perfect technique”• How relaxing strict range-of-motion rules improved his own training progress• When technique matters most vs. when it becomes counterproductive• The nuance required to apply evidence in real-world training• And much moreIG: @revivestrongerCHAPTERS00:00 Introduction and Welcome00:16 Guest Introduction - Steve Hall00:58 The Evolution of Fitness Podcasts01:51 Muscle Building Insights - Rest Length Between Sets08:46 Strength vs. Hypertrophy Training17:41 The Role of Fatigue in Training24:11 Training Hard vs. Perfect Technique26:59 Advanced Techniques for Muscle Failure28:54 The Importance of Technique Over Form30:24 Reevaluating Range of Motion33:50 Sponsor Break - Train Heroic45:47 Nutrition for Muscle Growth46:24 The Role of Caloric Surplus in Muscle Building52:33 Final Thoughts and ResourcesSUPPORT THE SHOWIf this episode helped you, you can help me by:• Subscribing and checking out more episodes• Sharing it on your social media (tag me - I'll respond)• Sending it to a friend who's trying to build muscle without burning outFOLLOW ANDREW COATESInstagram: @andrewcoatesfitnesshttps://www.andrewcoatesfitness.comPARTNERS AND RESOURCESRP Strength App (use code COATESRP)https://www.rpstrength.com/coatesJust Bite Me Meals (use code ANDREWCOATESFITNESS for 10% off)https://justbitememeals.com/MacrosFirst - FREE PREMIUM TRIALDownload MacrosFirst and during setup you'll be asked “How did you hear about us?”Type in: ANDREWKNKG Bags (15% off)https://www.knkg.com/Andrew59676Versa Gripps (discount link)https://www.versagripps.com/andrewcoatesTRAINHEROIC - FREE 90-DAY TRIAL (2 steps)Go to https://www.trainheroic.com/liftfreeReply to the email you receive (or email trials@trainheroic.com) and let them know I sent you

In this follow-up to our deep dive on Interoception, we tackle the real-world struggles of reconnecting with your body. We discuss why you might feel "numb" when you try to scan your body, why some people feel hungry 24/7 (and what it really means), and whether you can heal your relationship with food while still tracking calories.Key Questions Answered:What if I do the body scan and feel absolutely nothing?Why does it feel like I'm hungry every waking hour?Do I have to delete MyFitnessPal to learn intuitive eating?How do I find the "stop" signal when I'm used to cleaning my plate?I know it's anxiety, not hunger—but I still want to eat. Now what?Action Step: Try the "Halftime Pause". At your next meal, stop eating when your food is half gone. Put the fork down for two minutes. Don't look at your phone. Just sit. Give your satiety signal time to travel from your gut to your brain.

Calorie counting may work short-term, but after 40, it often drives stress, metabolic slowdown, and frustration. This episode explains why restriction backfires. You were never meant to fight your body. Healing begins with grace, not guilt. 

In this episode of the Leading Voices in Food podcast, Norbert Wilson of Duke University's Sanford School of Public Policy speaks with researchers Jean Adams from the University of Cambridge and Mike Essman from Duke's World Food Policy Center. They discuss the mandatory calorie labeling policy introduced in England in April 2022 for large food-away-from-home outlets. The conversation covers the study recently published in the British Medical Journal, exploring its results, strengths, limitations, and implications within the broader context of food labeling and public health policies. Key findings include a slight overall reduction in calorie content offered by food outlets, driven by the removal of higher-calorie items rather than reformulation. The discussion also touches on the potential impacts on different consumer groups, the challenges of policy enforcement, and how such policies could be improved to more effectively support public health goals. Interview Summary Now everyone knows eating out is just part of life. For many, it's a place to make connections, can be a guilty pleasure, and sometimes it's just an outright necessity for busy folks. But it is also linked to poor dietary quality, weight gain, and even obesity. For policymakers, the challenge is identifying what policy changes can help improve population health. Jean, let's begin with you. Can you tell our listeners about the UK's menu labeling intervention and what change did you hope to see? Jean - Yes, so this was a policy that was actually a really long time in coming and came in and out of favor with a number of different governments. So maybe over the last 10 years we've had various different suggestions to have voluntary and/or mandatory calorie labeling in the out-of-home sector. Eventually in April, 2022, we did have new mandatory regulations that came into a force that required large businesses just in England - so not across the whole of the UK, just in England - if they sold food and non-alcoholic drinks and they had to display the calories per portion of every item that they were selling. And then have alongside that somewhere on their menu, a statement that said that adults need around 2000 calories per day. The policy applied just to large businesses, and the definition of that was that those businesses have 250 or more employees, but the employees didn't all have to be involved in serving food and drinks. This might apply also to a large hotel chain who just have some bars or something in their hotels. And the food and drinks covered were things that were available for immediate consumption. Not prepackaged. And then there was also this proviso to allow high-end restaurants to be changing their menus regularly. So, it was only for things that were on the menu for at least 30 days. You mentioned that this policy or a menu labeling might have at least two potential modes of impacts. There's first this idea that providing calories or any sort of labeling on food can somehow provide information for consumers to make what we might hope would be better choices. Might help them choose lower calorie options or healthier options. And then the second potential impact is that businesses might also use the information to change what sort of foods they're serving. It might be that they didn't realize how many calories were in the foods and they're suddenly embarrassed about it. Or as soon as their customers realize, they start to put a little bit of pressure on, you know, we want something a little bit lower calorie. So, there's this potential mechanism that operates at the demand side of how consumers might make choices. And another one at the supply side of what might be available to consumers. And we knew from previous evaluations of these sorts of interventions that there was some evidence that both could occur. Generally, it seems to be that findings from other places and countries are maybe null to small. So, we were thinking that maybe we might see something similar in England. Thank you for sharing that background. I do have a question about the length of time it took to get this menu labeling law in place. Before we get into the results, do you have a sense of why did it take so long? Was it industry pushback? Was it just change of governments? Do you have a sense of that? Jean - Yes, so I think it's probably a bit of both. To begin with, it was first proposed as a voluntary measure actually by industry. So, we had this kind of big public-private partnership. What can industry do to support health? And that was one of the things they proposed. And then they didn't really do it very well. So, there was this idea that everybody would do it. And in fact, we found maybe only about 20% of outlets did it. And then definitely we have had government churn in the UK over the last five years or so. So, every new prime minister really came in and wanted to have their own obesity policy threw out the last one started over. And every policy needs consulted on with the public and then with industry. And that whole process just kind of got derailed over and over again. Thank you. That is really helpful to understand that development of the policy and why it took time. Industry regulated policy can be a tricky one to actually see the results that we would hope. You've already given us a sort of insight into what you thought the results may be from previous studies - null to relatively small. So, Mike, I want to turn to you. Can you tell us what came out of the data? Mike - Thank you, yes. So, we found a small overall drop in average calories offered per item. That amounts to a total of nine calories per item reduction in our post policy period relative to pre policy. And this is about a 2% reduction. It was statistically significant and we do in public health talk about how small effects can still have big impacts. So, I do want to sort of put that out there, but also recognize that it was a small overall drop in calories. And then what we did is we looked at how different food groups changed, and also how calories changed at different types of restaurants, whether it was fast food, restaurants, sit downs that we call pubs, bars, and inns. And then also other different types of takeaways like cafes and things like that where you might get a coffee or a cappuccino or something like that. What we found was driving the overall reduction in calories was a reduction in higher calorie items. So, as Jean mentioned at the outset, one of the things we were trying to identify in this analysis was whether we saw any evidence of reformulation. And we defined reformulation as whether specific products were reduced in their calories so that the same products were lower calories in the post period. We define that as reformulation. And that would be different from, say, a change in menu offering where you might identify a high calorie item and take it off the menu so that then the overall calories offered goes down on average. We found more evidence for the latter. Higher calorie items were removed. We separated into categories of removed items, items that were present in both periods, and new items added in the post period. There were higher calorie items in the removed group. The items that were present in both periods did not change. The new items were lower calorie items. What this says overall is this average reduction is driven by taking off high calorie items, adding some slightly lower calorie items. But we did not find evidence for reformulation, which is a crucial finding as well. We saw that the largest reductions occurred in burgers, beverages and a rather large mixed group called Mains. So, burgers reduced by 103 calories per item. That's pretty substantial. One of the reasons that's so large is that burgers, particularly if they're offered at a pub and might even come with fries or chips, as they say in the UK. And because they have such a high baseline calorie level, there's more opportunity to reduce. So, whether it's making it slightly smaller patty or reducing the cheese or something like that, that's where we saw larger reductions among the burgers. With beverages, typically, this involved the addition of lower calorie options, which is important if it gives an opportunity for lower calorie selections. And that was the main driver of reduction there. And then also we saw in Mains a reduction of 30 calories per item. A couple of the other things we wanted to identify is whether there was a change in the number of items that were considered over England's recommended calories per meal. The recommended calories per meal is 600 calories or less for lunch and dinner. And we saw no statistical change in that group. So overall, we do see a slight reduction in average calories. But this study did not examine changes in consumer behavior. I do want to just briefly touch on that because this was part of a larger evaluation. Another study that was published using customer surveys that was published in Nature Human Behavior found no change in the average calories purchased or consumed after the policy. This evaluation was looking at both the supply and the demand side changes as a result of this policy. Thanks, Mike and I've got lots of questions to follow up, but I'll try to control myself. The first one I'm interested to understand is you talk about the importance of the really calorie-heavy items being removed and the introduction of newer, lower calorie items. And you said that this is not a study of the demand, but I'm interested to know, do you have a sense that the higher calorie items may not have been high or top sellers. It could be easy for a restaurant to get rid of those. Do you have any sense of, you know, the types of items that were removed and of the consumer demand for those items? Mike - Yes. So, as I mentioned, given that the largest changes were occurring among burgers, we're sort of doing this triangulation attempt to examine all of the different potential impacts we can with the study tools we have. We did not see those changes reflected in consumer purchases. So, I think sticking with the evidence, the best thing we could say is that the most frequently purchased items were not the ones that were being pulled off of menus. I think that would be the closest to the evidence. Now, no study is perfect and we did in that customer survey examine the purchases and consumption of about 3000 individuals before and after the policy. It's relatively large, but certainly not fully comprehensive. But based on what we were able to find, it would seem that those reductions in large calorie items, it's probably fair to say, were sort of marginal choices. So, we see some reduction in calories at the margins. That's why the overall is down, but we don't see at the most commonly sold. I should also mention in response to that, a lot of times when we think about eating out of home, we often think about fast food. We did not see reductions in fast food chains at all, essentially. And so really the largest reductions we found were in what would be considered more sit-down dining establishment. For example, sit-down restaurants or even pubs, bars and ends was one of our other categories. We did see average reductions in those chains. The areas you kind of think about for people grabbing food quickly on the go, we did not see reductions there. And we think some of this is a function of the data itself, which is pubs, bars and inns, because they offer larger plates, there's a little bit more space for them to reduce. And so those are where we saw the reductions. But in what we might typically think is sort of the grab and go type of food, we did not see reductions in those items. And so when we did our customer surveys, we saw that those did not lead to reductions in calories consumed. Ahh, I see this and thank you for this. It sounds like the portfolio adjusted: getting rid of those heavy calorie items, adding more of the lower calorie items that may not have actually changed what consumers actually eat. Because the ones that they typically eat didn't change at all. And I would imagine from what you've said that large global brands may not have made many changes, but more local brands have more flexibility is my assumption of that. So that, that's really helpful to see. As you all looked at the literature, you had the knowledge that previous studies have found relatively small changes. Could you tell us about what this work looks like globally? There are other countries that have tried policy similar to this. What did you learn from those other countries about menu labeling? Jean - Well, I mean, I'm tempted to say that we maybe should have learned that this wasn't the sort of policy that we could expect to make a big change. To me one of the really attractive features of a labeling policy is it kind of reflects back those two mechanisms we've talked about - information and reformulation or changing menus. Because we can talk about it in those two different ways of changing the environment and also helping consumers make better choices, then it can be very attractive across the political landscape. And I suspect that that is one of the things that the UK or England learned. And that's reflected in the fact that it took a little while to get it over the line, but that lots of different governments came back to it. That it's attractive to people thinking about food and thinking about how we can support people to eat better in kind of a range of different ways. I think what we learned, like putting the literature all together, is this sort of policy might have some small effects. It's not going to be the thing that kind of changes the dial on diet related diseases. But that it might well be part of an integrated strategy of many different tools together. I think we can also learn from the literature on labeling in the grocery sector where there's been much more exploration of different types of labeling. Whether colors work, whether black stop signs are more effective. And that leads us to conclusions that these more interpretive labels can lead to bigger impacts and consumer choices than just a number, right? A number is quite difficult to make some sense of. And I think that there are some ways that we could think about optimizing the policy in England before kind of writing it off as not effective. Thank you. I think what you're saying is it worked, but it works maybe in the context of other policies, is that a fair assessment? Jean - Well, I mean, the summary of our findings, Mike's touched on quite a lot of it. We found that there was an increase in outlets adhering to the policy. That went from about 20% offered any labeling to about 80%. So, there were still some places that were not doing what they were expected to do. But there was big changes in actual labeling practice. People also told us that they noticed the labels more and they said that they used them much more than they were previously. Like there was some labeling before. We had some big increases in noticing and using. But it's... we found this no change in calories purchased or calories consumed. Which leads to kind of interesting questions. Okay, so what were they doing with it when they were using it? And maybe some people were using it to help them make lower calorie choices, but other people were trying to optimize calories for money spent? We saw these very small changes in the mean calorie of items available that Mike's described in lots of detail. And then we also did some work kind of exploring with restaurants, people who worked in the restaurant chains and also people responsible for enforcement, kind of exploring their experiences with the policy. And one of the big conclusions from that was that local government were tasked with enforcement, but they weren't provided with any additional resources to make that happen. And for various reasons, it essentially didn't happen. And we've seen that with a number of different policies in the food space in the UK. That there's this kind of presumption of compliance. Most people are doing it all right. We're not doing it a hundred percent and that's probably because it's not being checked and there's no sanction for not following the letter of the law. One of the reasons that local authorities are not doing enforcement, apart from that they don't have resources or additional resources for it, is that they have lots of other things to do in the food space, and they see those things as like higher risk. And so more important to do. One of those things is inspecting for hygiene, making sure that the going out is not poisonous or adulterated or anything like that. And you can absolutely understand that. These things that might cause acute sickness, or even death in the case of allergies, are much more important for them to be keeping an eye on than labeling. One of the other things that emerged through the process of implementation, and during our evaluation, was a big concern from communities with experience of eating disorders around kind of a greater focus on calorie counting. And lots of people recounting their experience that they just find that very difficult to be facing in a space where they're maybe not trying to think about their eating disorder or health. And then they're suddenly confronted with it. And when we've gone back and looked at the literature, there's just not very much literature on the impact of calorie labeling on people with eating disorders. And so we're a little bit uncertain still about whether that is a problem, but it's certainly perceived to be a problem. And lots of people find the policy difficult for that reason because they know someone in their family or one of their friends with an eating disorder. And they're very alert to that potential harm. I think this is a really important point to raise that the law, the menu labeling, could have differential effects on different consumers. I'm not versed in this literature on the triggering effects of seeing menu labeling for people with disordered eating. But then I'm also thinking about a different group of consumers. Consumers who are already struggling with obesity, and whether or not this policy is more effective for those individuals versus folks who are not. In the work that you all did, did you have any sense of are there heterogeneous effects of the labeling? Did different consumers respond differentially to seeing the menu label? Not just, for example, individuals maybe with disordered eating? Mike - In this work, we mostly focused on compliance, customer responses in terms of consumption and purchases, changes in menus, and customers reporting whether or not they increase noticing and using. When we looked at the heterogeneous effects, some of these questions are what led us to propose a new project where we interviewed people and tried to understand their responses to calorie labeling. And there we get a lot of heterogenous groups. In those studies, and this work has not actually been published, but should be in the new year, we found that there's a wide range of different types of responses to the policy. For example, there may be some people who recently started going to the gym and maybe they're trying to actually bulk up. And so, they'll actually choose higher calorie items. Conversely, there may be people who have a fitness routine or a dieting lifestyle that involves calorie tracking. And they might be using an app in order to enter the calories into that. And those people who are interested in calorie counting, they really loved the policy. They really wanted the policy. And it gave them a sense of control over their diet. And they felt comfortable and were really worried that if there was evidence that it wouldn't work, that would be taken away. Then you have a whole different group of people who are living with eating disorders who don't want to interact with those numbers when they are eating out of home. They would rather eat socially and not have to think about those challenges. There's really vast diversity in terms of the responses to the policy. And that does present a challenge. And I think what it also does is cause us just to question what is the intended mechanism of action of this policy? Because when the policy was implemented, there's an idea of a relatively narrow set of effects. If customers don't understand the number of calories that are in their items, you just provide them with the calories that are in those items, they will then make better choices as rational actors. But we know that eating out of home is far more complex. It's social. There are issues related to value for money. So maybe people want to make sure they're purchasing food that hasn't been so reduced in portions that now they don't get the value for money when they eat out. There are all sorts of body image related challenges when people may eat out. We didn't find a lot of evidence of this in our particular sample, but also in some of our consultation with the public in developing the interview, there's concern about judgment from peers when eating out. So, it's a very sensitive topic. Some of the implications of that are we do probably need more communication strategies that can come alongside these policies and sort of explain the intended mechanism impact to the public. We can't expect to simply add numbers to items and then expect that people are going to make the exact choices that are sort of in the best interest of public health. And that sort of brings us on to some potential alternative mechanisms of impact and other modes of labeling, and those sorts of things. Mike, this has been really helpful because you've also hinted at some of the ways that this policy as implemented, could have been improved. And I wonder, do you have any other thoughts to add to how to make a policy like this have a bigger impact. Mike - Absolutely. One of the things that was really helpful when Jean laid out her framing of the policy was there's multiple potential mechanisms of action. One of those is the potential reformulation in menu change. We talked about those results. Another intended mechanism of action is through consumer choice. So, if items have fewer calories on average, then that could reduce ultimately calories consumed. Or if people make choices of lower calorie items, that could also be a way to reduce the overall calories consumed. And I would say this calorie labeling policy, it is a step because the calories were not previously available. People did not know what they were eating. And if you provide that, that fulfills the duty of transparency by businesses. When we spoke to people who worked in enforcement, they did support the policy simply on the basis of transparency because it's important for people to understand what they're consuming. And so that's sort of a generally acceptable principle. However, if we want to actually have stronger population health impact, then we do need to have stronger mechanisms of action. One of the ways that can reduce calories consumed by the consumers, so the sort of demand side, would be some of the interpretive labels. Jean mentioned them earlier. There's now a growing body of evidence of across, particularly in Latin America. I would say some of the strongest evidence began in Chile, but also in Mexico and in other Latin American countries where they've put warning labels on items in order to reduce their consumption. These are typically related to packaged foods is where most of the work has been done. But in order to reduce consumer demand, what it does is rather than expecting people to be sort of doing math problems on the fly, as they go around and make their choices, you're actually just letting them know, well, by the way, this is an item that's very high in calories or saturated fat, or sodium or sugars. Or some combination of those. What that does is you've already helped make that decision for the consumers. You've at least let them know this item has a high level of nutrients of concern. And you can take that away. Conversely, if you have an item that's 487 calories, do you really know what you're going to do with that information? So that's one way to have stronger impact. The other way that that type of policy can have stronger impact is it sets clear thresholds for those warnings. And so, when you have clear thresholds for warnings, you can have a stronger mechanism for reformulation. And what companies may want to do is they may not want to display those warning labels, maybe because it's embarrassing. It makes their candy or whatever the unhealthy food look bad. Sort of an eyesore, which is the point. And what they'll do is they can reformulate those nutrients to lower levels so that they no longer qualify for that regulation. And so there are ways to essentially strengthen both of those mechanisms of action. Whereas when it's simply on the basis of transparency, then what that does is leave all of the decision making and work on the consumer. Mike, this is great because I've worked with colleagues like Gabby Fretes and Sean Cash and others on some menu labeling out of Chile. And we're currently doing some work within the center on food nutrition labels to see how different consumers are responding. There's a lot more work to be done in this space. And, of course, our colleagues at UNC (University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill) have also been doing this work. So, this work is really important because it tells us how it can help consumers make different choices, and how it can affect how companies behave. My final question to the two of you is simply, what would you like policymakers to learn from this study? Or maybe not just this study alone, but this body of work. What should they take away? Jean - Well, I think there's lots of information out there on how to do food labeling well, and we can certainly learn from that. And Mike talks about the work from South America particularly where they're helping people identify the least healthy products. And they're also providing messaging around what you should do with that - like choose a product with fewer of these black symbols. But I think even if labeling is optimized, it's not really going to solve our problem of dietary related diseases. And I think I always want policymakers to know, and I think many of them do understand this, that there is no one magic solution and we need to be thinking about labeling as part of a strategy that addresses marketing in its entirety, right? Companies are using all sorts of strategies to encourage us to buy products. We need to be thinking of all sorts of strategies to support people to buy different products and to eat better. And I think that focuses on things like rebalancing price, supporting people to afford healthier food, focusing advertising and price promotions on healthier products. And I also think we need to be looking even further upstream though, right? That we need to be thinking about the incentives that are driving companies to make and sell less healthy products. Because I don't think that they particularly want to be selling less healthy products or causing lots of illness. It's those products are helping them achieve their aims of creating profit and growth for their shareholders. And I think we need to find creative ways to support companies to experiment with healthier products that either help them simultaneously achieve those demands of profit or growth. Or somehow allow them to step away from those demands either for a short period or for a longer period. I think that that requires us to kind of relook at how we do business in economics in our countries. Mike? Yes, I think that was a really thorough answer by Jean. So, I'll just add a couple points. I think most fundamentally what we need to think about when we're doing policy making to improve diet is we need to always think about are we helping to make the healthier choice the easier choice? And what that means is we're not implementing policies that merely provide information that then require individuals to do the rest of the work. We need to have a food environment that includes healthier options that are easily accessible, but also affordable. That's one thing that's come through in quite a lot of the work we've done. There are a lot of concerns about the high cost of food. If people feel like the healthier choices are also affordable choices, that's one of many ways to support the easier choice. And I really just want to reiterate what Jean said in terms of the economics of unhealthy food. In many ways, these large multinational corporations are from their perspective, doing right by their shareholders by producing a profitable product. Now there are debates on whether or not that's a good thing, of course. There's quite a lot of evidence for the negative health impacts of ultra-processed (UPF) products, and those are getting a lot more attention these days and that's a good thing. What we do need to think about is why is it that UPFs are so widely consumed. In many ways they are optimized to be over consumed. They're optimized to be highly profitable. Because the ingredients that are involved in their production means that they can add a lot of salt, sugar, and fat. And what that does is lead to overconsumption. We need to think about that there's something fundamentally broken about this incentive structure. That is incentivizing businesses to sell unhealthy food products with these food additives that lead to over consumption, obesity, and the associated comorbidities. And if we can start to make a little progress and think creatively about how could we incentivize a different incentive structure. One where actually it would be in a food business's best interest to be much more innovative and bolder and produce healthier products for everyone. That's something that I think we will have to contend with because if we are thinking that we are only going to be able to restrict our way out of this, then that's very difficult. Because people still need to have healthy alternatives, and so we can't merely think about restricting. We also have to think about how do we promote access to healthier foods. This is great insight. I appreciate the phrasing of making the healthy choice the easy choice, and I also heard a version of this making the healthy choice the affordable choice. But it also seems like we need to find ways to make the healthy choice the profitable choice as well. Bios: Jean Adams is a Professor of Dietary Public Health and leads the Population Health Interventions Programme at the University of Cambridge MRC Epidemiology Unit. Adams trained in medicine before completing a PhD on socio-economic inequalities in health. This was followed by an MRC Health of the Population fellowship and an NIHR Career Development Fellowship both exploring influences on health behaviours and socio-economic inequalities in these. During these fellowships Jean was appointed Lecturer, then Senior Lecturer, in Public Health at Newcastle University. Jean moved to Cambridge University to join the MRC Epidemiology Unit and CEDAR in 2014 where she helped establish the Dietary Public Health group. She became Programme Leader in the newly formed Population Health Interventions programme in 2020, and was appointed Professor of Dietary Public Health in 2022. Mike Essman is a Research Scientist at Duke University's World Food Policy Center. His background is in evaluating nutrition and food policies aimed at improving diets and preventing cardiometabolic diseases. His work employs both quantitative and qualitative methods to explore drivers of dietary behavior, particularly ultra-processed food consumption, across diverse environments and countries. Mike earned his PhD in Nutrition Epidemiology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where his research focused on evaluating the impacts of a sugary beverage tax in South Africa. He completed MSc degrees in Medical Anthropology and Global Health Science at the University of Oxford through a fellowship. Prior to joining Duke, he conducted research at the MRC Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge, where he evaluated the impacts of calorie labeling policies in England and led a study examining public perceptions of ultra-processed foods.  

In this session, we address a critical strategic error many patients make when undergoing spinal decompression treatments like IDD therapy. It is common for clinics to advise pausing rehabilitation exercises during the initial weeks of treatment. However, we argue that building spinal stability and strength should happen concurrently—or even beforehand—to protect the spine during the travel to and from the clinic. We discuss how to strategically schedule decompression sessions, ideally placing them after your heaviest workout days (like Phase 3 or Phase 4 squat sessions) to utilise the treatment as a recovery tool rather than a passive cure.We also dive deep into the metabolic requirements of healing a herniated disc or recovering from sciatica. A significant topic discussed is the use of creatine monohydrate; specifically, dispelling the marketing myths surrounding expensive "women-specific" supplements. We explain why standard creatine is essential not just for muscle growth, but for cognitive function and recovery. Furthermore, we warn against maintaining a steep calorie deficit during rehabilitation. Healing nerves and building tissue is an energy-expensive process, and insufficient nutrition can lead to increased delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and stalled progress.Finally, we cover essential technique corrections for the squat and hip hinge to prevent neck pain, using the "pike" analogy to maintain a true neutral spine. We also tackle the misconception of "weak knees" in older adults, explaining why leg strengthening is the solution, and provide a guide on the absolute essentials for a home gym setup that allows for long-term progression without filling your house with equipment.

Salam my love!This is part two in collaboration with Kiandra Browne. If there's a little bit of background noise, I'm sorry, I tried my best to get rid of it (#notworking). I hope that you're able to pull a lot of information from this episode, because we discuss everything from fitness routines, to calorie tracking, to protein and fat loss. As always, if you have any questions, podcast episode recommendations, or would just like to chat, feel free to reach out to me via IG or email, or the Spotify chatbox. If you've read this description, let me know: what are some of the biggest things you're struggling with, and how do you think I could help? See you soon, InshaAllah.

Found My Fitness - Rhonda Patrick: Read the notes at at podcastnotes.org. Don't forget to subscribe for free to our newsletter, the top 10 ideas of the week, every Monday --------- Get access to more than 200 episodes of my premium podcast (The Aliquot) when you sign up as a FoundMyFitness Premium Member Download my "How to Train According to the Experts" guide One minute of vigorous exercise may be worth up to ten minutes of "moderate" cardio for extending lifespan and preventing chronic disease. In this Journal Club episode, Rhonda Patrick, PhD and endurance athlete Brady Holmer dissect a new Nature Communications study of more than 70,000 adults showing that vigorous intensity is roughly 4–10x more potent than moderate activity for reducing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, type 2 diabetes, and cancer outcomes—far beyond the long-standing 1:2 rule embedded in global exercise guidelines. Timestamps: (00:00) Introduction (07:01) What exactly is the 1:2 rule for exercise intensity? (08:18) Calorie burn vs. longevity—origins of the 1:2 rule (11:15) What counts as 'vigorous' exercise, really? (13:35) Where the exercise guidelines fall short (14:19) Can your wearable predict disease risk years in advance? (20:11) Is vigorous activity easier to achieve than people think? (22:47) How researchers avoided the 'healthy user bias' (23:59) Health equivalence ratio—a better way to measure exercise benefits? (25:45) Is vigorous exercise truly 4–10x more effective? (29:55) Can one vigorous minute match an hour of gentle walking? (32:02) Why vigorous activity—not gentle—offers dose-dependent benefits (33:50) Is vigorous exercise 5x better at preventing heart attacks & strokes? (34:24) Why vigorous activity stands out for cancer prevention (34:59) Does zone 2 qualify as vigorous exercise? (36:11) Dose-response comparison—vigorous vs. moderate vs. light activity (37:22) Is vigorous exercise the secret to younger arteries? (43:15) Why aging hearts need intensity (46:09) Can vigorous exercise halt your VO₂ max decline? (47:26) Why moderate exercise alone might not improve VO₂ max (49:21) Is vigorous exercise 10x more powerful at preventing diabetes? (55:48) Mitochondrial biogenesis—why intensity is essential (58:40) Can you directly measure mitochondrial health? (1:00:57) Does vigorous exercise kill circulating tumor cells? (1:07:15) Why vigorous intensity triggers beneficial hormone changes (1:08:05) Can vigorous activity protect older adults from falls? (1:12:36) Does vigorous exercise combat inflammation? (1:14:29) Is high-intensity training the key to a younger brain? (1:16:01) Is vigorous exercise more powerful than we realized? (1:17:50) Can the benefits of vigorous exercise fit into a pill? (1:19:08) How small doses of intensity might extend your lifespan (1:23:15) Do short bursts of vigorous movement match full workouts? (1:27:26) Why your wearable might undervalue short vigorous bouts (1:30:06) Can planned micro-workouts replace traditional gym sessions? (1:35:10) Why exercise guidelines urgently need updating (1:46:35) Does light activity still offer real benefits? (1:49:04) Is vigorous exercise safe for older adults? (1:53:28) Are high-intensity workouts detrimental to female hormones? (1:58:02) Safe vigorous exercise options—even with chronic illness (1:59:05) The 80/20 rule for balancing intensity and recovery (2:01:30) Inside Brady's routine—how much vigorous exercise is optimal? (2:05:17) Can vigorous activity boost kids' brainpower (and grades)? (2:08:14) Are we significantly underestimating vigorous exercise benefits? (2:10:03) Why chasing steps isn't the answer Show notes are available by clicking here Watch this episode on YouTube

This week's questions:1. Are there any downsides of my going over my protein targets for the day? (set about 2g per kg bodyweight).2. Should I cut my calories each day the week leading up to a wedding where I'll be having a big day of eating and drinking?3. What are some more advanced nutrition strategies you use with athletes that they might not even know about before working with you?Performance Nutrition Coaching: ⁠⁠⁠https://conoroneillnutrition.com/nutritioncoachingInstagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://instagram.com/conoroneillnutrition

Ever wish you could lose weight without logging every crumb, giving up Oreos, or spiraling with guilt after a snack attack? Girl, SAME.But Macy? She's proof that you don't have to do any of that.In today's episode, I'm chatting with Macy—a rockstar mom (of TWO under three!) and Mindful Weight Loss Academy client—who lost 26 pounds (and 2 pant sizes!) just 4 months postpartum…without dieting, calorie counting, or giving up Oreos.We're diving into what it really takes to lose weight mindfully: eating real food (yes, even deep-fried fair food!), joining an amazing community for support, and actually putting yourself FIRST for once. Macy shares how upping her protein, listening to her body (no more eating by the clock!), and giving herself grace changed everything. Plus, she dishes on how her healthy habits are rubbing off on her family and friends (hello, ripple effect)!If you're tired of starting over every Monday, convinced you “don't have time,” or nervous to invest in yourself, you need to hear Macy's story. This episode is REAL TALK about mom life, weight loss, and why it's totally possible for you—yes, YOU—to lose weight and keep it off without restriction or deprivation.Ready for your own transformation? Hit play and let's do this together!xoxo,JackieConnect with Macy:Instagram: @macyraine4MORE FROM JACKIE: >

Get access to more than 200 episodes of my premium podcast (The Aliquot) when you sign up as a FoundMyFitness Premium Member Download my "How to Train According to the Experts" guide One minute of vigorous exercise may be worth up to ten minutes of "moderate" cardio for extending lifespan and preventing chronic disease. In this Journal Club episode, Rhonda Patrick, PhD and endurance athlete Brady Holmer dissect a new Nature Communications study of more than 70,000 adults showing that vigorous intensity is roughly 4–10x more potent than moderate activity for reducing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, type 2 diabetes, and cancer outcomes—far beyond the long-standing 1:2 rule embedded in global exercise guidelines. Timestamps: (00:00) Introduction (07:01) What exactly is the 1:2 rule for exercise intensity? (08:18) Calorie burn vs. longevity—origins of the 1:2 rule (11:15) What counts as 'vigorous' exercise, really? (13:35) Where the exercise guidelines fall short (14:19) Can your wearable predict disease risk years in advance? (20:11) Is vigorous activity easier to achieve than people think? (22:47) How researchers avoided the 'healthy user bias' (23:59) Health equivalence ratio—a better way to measure exercise benefits? (25:45) Is vigorous exercise truly 4–10x more effective? (29:55) Can one vigorous minute match an hour of gentle walking? (32:02) Why vigorous activity—not gentle—offers dose-dependent benefits (33:50) Is vigorous exercise 5x better at preventing heart attacks & strokes? (34:24) Why vigorous activity stands out for cancer prevention (34:59) Does zone 2 qualify as vigorous exercise? (36:11) Dose-response comparison—vigorous vs. moderate vs. light activity (37:22) Is vigorous exercise the secret to younger arteries? (43:15) Why aging hearts need intensity (46:09) Can vigorous exercise halt your VO₂ max decline? (47:26) Why moderate exercise alone might not improve VO₂ max (49:21) Is vigorous exercise 10x more powerful at preventing diabetes? (55:48) Mitochondrial biogenesis—why intensity is essential (58:40) Can you directly measure mitochondrial health? (1:00:57) Does vigorous exercise kill circulating tumor cells? (1:07:15) Why vigorous intensity triggers beneficial hormone changes (1:08:05) Can vigorous activity protect older adults from falls? (1:12:36) Does vigorous exercise combat inflammation? (1:14:29) Is high-intensity training the key to a younger brain? (1:16:01) Is vigorous exercise more powerful than we realized? (1:17:50) Can the benefits of vigorous exercise fit into a pill? (1:19:08) How small doses of intensity might extend your lifespan (1:23:15) Do short bursts of vigorous movement match full workouts? (1:27:26) Why your wearable might undervalue short vigorous bouts (1:30:06) Can planned micro-workouts replace traditional gym sessions? (1:35:10) Why exercise guidelines urgently need updating (1:46:35) Does light activity still offer real benefits? (1:49:04) Is vigorous exercise safe for older adults? (1:53:28) Are high-intensity workouts detrimental to female hormones? (1:58:02) Safe vigorous exercise options—even with chronic illness (1:59:05) The 80/20 rule for balancing intensity and recovery (2:01:30) Inside Brady's routine—how much vigorous exercise is optimal? (2:05:17) Can vigorous activity boost kids' brainpower (and grades)? (2:08:14) Are we significantly underestimating vigorous exercise benefits? (2:10:03) Why chasing steps isn't the answer Show notes are available by clicking here Watch this episode on YouTube

In this episode:Calorie myth debunkWhy cardio isn't your transformationThe truth about gut healthAlcohol without shameHow the industry confuses high-achieving womenWhat sustainable transformation ACTUALLY requiresHow to break out of the noise and into alignment

Be Kind & Grateful to Be Great PodcastFIVE PRIMARY POINTS of the PODCASTHuman Connection Matters More Than DataDr. Mishra opens with Dean Ornish's idea that connection and community are as essential as food, water, and air. He argues we are drowning in data but starving for direction, and asks listeners to stop tracking themselves for a week and intentionally engage with real humans.Biomarkers Alone Cannot Measure VitalityDespite years of research—including PRP innovation and extensive self-testing—Dr. Mishra emphasizes that no single biomarker or panel can accurately quantify vitality. He critiques the booming longevity-tech market for offering more marketing than science.The Hottest Longevity Tests Have Limited EvidenceHe reviews four major categories:* Blood-based biomarker panels: Huge market but very little peer-reviewed evidence supporting meaningful insights.* Microbiome testing: Promising but still early; diverse gut bacteria correlate with healthier aging.* Biologic clocks (epigenetic, facial, retinal): Interesting but inconsistent, easily cherry-picked, and not yet clinically integrated.* Liquid biopsies & whole-body MRI: Useful mainly for high-risk populations; false positives can cause harm.Overall: science lags far behind the hype.The Best Ways to Slow Biological Aging Are Proven and SimpleBased on published data, the most reliable methods to slow biological aging remain:* Consistent physical activity* High-quality sleep* Calorie restriction* Plant-forward diet* Optimal vitamin D* Higher income* Higher educationA Hybrid Future: Start With Human Vitality, Then Add TechDr. Mishra recommends:* Prioritizing human actions AI cannot do—forgiveness, fun, imagination, courage, resilience, service, connection.* Considering comprehensive testing at two strategic “warranty expiration” stages: early 40s and late 50s.* Building a future where human vitality comes first, and elite technology augments—not replaces—our humanity.Copyright, VyVerse, LLC. All Rights Reserved. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit vitalityexplorers.substack.com/subscribe

Is it possible to build muscle while eating fewer calories? Absolutely—and Kim Constable is here to explain why. In this episode, she busts the myth that you need a calorie surplus to grow muscle and exposes why that belief only applies to professional bodybuilders training to total failure daily. For most women? The real issue isn't food. It's effort and patience. You'll learn: Why women can gain muscle in a deficit How training harder (not eating more) gets results Why bodybuilder advice doesn't apply to your lifestyle What you need to change if you want to see real body composition shifts This episode will completely reframe how you approach muscle building and fat loss. Keywords: build muscle in deficit, calorie deficit muscle gain, strength training for women, lean muscle growth, fat loss without bulking, women's fitness myths, menopause muscle building, real talk fitness podcast, Kim Constable, The Sculpted Vegan

In this week's episode, we break down the three ways to achieve a calorie deficit as well as identify why the concept is easy to understand yet hard to achieve (and how to overcome it). This week's recipe is Buffalo Chicken Wraps. Schedule a visit today at www.bodymetrixhealth.com.

Calorie deficits can feel confusing, triggering, or downright exhausting—especially when you're trying to honor God with both your body and your mindset. In this episode, we explore a Christian, grace-filled approach to calorie deficits that removes the fear, pressure, and perfectionism. You'll walk away with clarity, peace, and practical ways to support your body without slipping back into diet culture. Get your show notes: https://gracefilledplate.com/christian-approach-to-calorie-deficits/ Links mentioned: Get your Overcoming Weight Loss Idols For a deep dive, check out Grace Filled Plate Platinum and be sure to get on the waiting list You may also love: Let's Talk, God! About Body Image Season 1 Episode 2: Ditching the Diet Mindset Season 2 Episode 21: The Keto Diet: Is It Biblical? Season 3 Episode 6: How to Align Your Weight Loss Goals and Values Season 4 Episode 2: 3 Inspiring Tips for When You Feel Weight Loss Discouragement Get a FREEBIE: Get your FREE Faith [is greater than] Food Jumpstart

‣ Book Your COMPLEMENTARY CONSULATION and CALORIE CALCULATION call:- how much & what to eat

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Do you choose red runners or dubias as feeder roaches for your gecko or tarantula? Learn the differences in behaviour, prices, and feeding experience—all at https://micedirect.com/ MiceDirect City: Cleveland Address: 651 Tom Bell Road USA Website: https://micedirect.com/ Phone: +1 706 892 4136 Email: sales@micedirect.com

In this episode, Chris breaks down easy, practical ways to lower the calories in your meals without losing flavour or feeling deprived. You'll learn the swaps he uses daily, how to bulk up meals with high-volume foods, and the small changes that make fat loss far easier to stick to. Simple, sustainable, and perfect for anyone wanting to eat big while losing weight.

In this powerful and deeply personal conversation, David Peck speaks with filmmaker Eisha Marjara about her new film Calorie, a story rooted in the emotional aftershocks of the 1985 Air India bombing. Drawing from her own family history and loss, Marjara unpacks the complex layers of grief, identity, and resilience embodied in Monica—a single mother living in the long shadow of tragedy. Together, they explore how personal trauma intersects with political and cultural histories, and how storytelling can reveal universal truths that bridge cultures and foster empathy. Calorie opens in theaters on November 28 and will be available elsewhere soon.Eisha Marjara gained recognition with her NFB docudrama Desperately Seeking Helen, winning the Critic's Choice Award at Locarno and the Jury Prize at München. She later wrote and directed. The Tourist, House for Sale, and the award-winning feature Venus. Her NFB short documentary Am I the Skinniest Person You've Ever Seen? won the Betty Youson Award for Best Canadian Short at the 2024 Hot Docs Festival, as well as Best Documentary at Frontdoc, and at It's All True film festival.Calorie is her most recent feature to date, inspired by real events.David Peck is a writer, speaker, and award-winning podcaster who works at the intersection of storytelling, social change, and meaningful dialogue. As the host of Face2Face and former host of Toronto Threads on 640 AM, he has published over 650 in-depth interviews with some of the world's most compelling thinkers, artists and storytellers, including Viggo Mortensen, Sarah Polley, Raoul Peck, Werner Herzog, Chris Hadfield, David Cronenberg, Gillian Anderson and Wade Davis.With a background in philosophy and international development, David brings a thoughtful, globally aware perspective to every conversation. He's a published author and experienced keynote speaker, known for creating spaces where complexity is welcomed and ideas come alive. Whether moderating panels, hosting live events, or speaking on issues ranging from ethics to media, David's work is grounded in a deep curiosity about people.At heart, he simply loves good conversation and believes it's one of the best ways we grow, connect, and make sense of the world.For more information about David Peck's podcasting, writing and public speaking please visit his site here.F2F Music and Image Copyright: David Peck, ICBL and Face2Face. Used with permission. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Welcome to the Mind Muscle Connection Podcast!In this coaches roundtable episode, I sat down with Brandon and Jeremiah to talk through some of the biggest topics lifters are wrestling with right now. Volume For Muscle Growth, Body Recomp, Calorie Surpluses, Fasted Training and MoreWe get into how we think about volume, why some people grow with less and some need more, the real story behind body recomposition, why surpluses don't need to be aggressive, and where fasted training or cardio makes sense. We also talk through recovery, life stress, metabolism shifts, and why execution matters more than chasing the “perfect” program.If you're trying to build muscle, get leaner, or better understand what's worth your time in training and nutrition, this episode is a must‑listen.Let's talk about:Coaches RoundtableUpdate on JeremiahBrandon's X-Frame training splitBrandon's volume strategy then vs nowFull body split pros & consBody recompCalorie surplusesFasted trainingWhere to find Jeremiah and BrandonFollow Jeremiah on IG: https://www.instagram.com/jeremiahbair/?hl=en Website: https://linktr.ee/jeremiahbairFollow Brandon on IG: https://www.instagram.com/brandondacruz_/Check out Brandon's website: https://www.brandondacruzfit.com/Follow me on Instagram for more information and education:  jeffhoehn_FREE 30 Min Strategy Call: HEREBody Recomp Masterclass: HERENutrition Periodization Masterclass: HEREHow You Can Work With Me?: HERECoaching application: HEREBody Recomp Checklist 2.0: https://chipper-producer-6244.kit.com/26b5c9f94a

Ep 92: In this follow-up conversation with Dr. Emily Dow, we dive deeper into our Advanced Training & Nutrition Online Program and what clients can expect inside. We break down the real journey of one of our clients who's currently down 13 pounds, including some of the exact protocols that Emily used and WHY. We also dive in on postpartum nutrition, energy intake, calorie burn from breastfeeding, if it's possible to build muscle at this stage and how to adjust cal intake or energy output once milk supply stops.Lastly we touch on ozempic - who it can really work for and which population it won't necessarily help.If you're interested in learning about:• Smart calorie cuts + why to avoid under-eating• Reverse diets and why they actually work• What to do when you hit a plateau• Postpartum weight loss + building muscle after birth• What happens when you stop burning milk-production calories• Ozempic: who it's for and who it's notThen tune into this episode + share it with someone if you find it useful! INTERESTED IN APPLYING FOR ADVANCED TRAINING AND NUTRITION? APPLY HERE.As always if this show brings you any value - please leave a comment on Spotify or a review! (Screenshot and send to info@chelseyrosehealth.com to be entered to win 1 free month of personalzied online training with Chelsey!).--------------Start your 7 day FREE trial of my new app HERE!Want to work one on one with Chelsey?Set up a one on one consultation call here to see if personalized online training is right for you.Join a semi-private class in LA here.Email info@chelseyrosehealth.com to inquire about one on one in person training.Follow Chelsey on Instagram:@Chelseyrosehealth@StrengthtobuildFollow Chelsey on TikTok Here."Submit a question to the show"

Think you're in a calorie deficit but not losing any weight? You're not alone and there's a good chance you're accidentally wiping out your deficit without even noticing.In this episode of Candidly with Coffee, we break down the sneaky habits that quietly erase your calorie deficit and stall fat loss even when you feel like you're “barely eating.” From weekend overeating and inconsistent tracking to mindless bites and underestimating portion sizes, this episode will help you finally understand what's keeping you stuck.What you'll learn:✔️ Why “eating less” doesn't always mean you're in a deficit✔️ The weekend eating cycle that destroys progress✔️ How under-tracking and “just a bite” habits add up fast✔️ Why consistency matters more than perfection✔️ How to create a true, sustainable deficit without starving yourselfIf you've been frustrated with slow or stalled progress, this episode will help you identify the hidden habits holding you back — so you can start seeing real results again.#CalorieDeficit #FatLossOver40 #WeightLossMistakes #MidlifeFitness #TrackYourFood #ConsistencyOverPerfection #CandidlyWithCoffee #PodcastJoin this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_8nonbBsA-mTli1KLlHlrA/joinWork with Jeaninehttps://www.jeanineescobar.comMike's YouTube Channel:  @escoelitemindsetMike's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/@escoelitemindsetSupport our Sponsors1UP Nutrition Code: JEANINEhttps://www.1upnutrition.com /discount/jeanineTranscendhttps://www.transcendcompany.com/escoeliteMegaFit Meals - Code Jeanine https://megafitmeals.rfrl.co/p75q7Built Bar Code: MRSCEOJhttps://builtbar.com?baapp=MRSCEOJSupport us by following on Social MediaAmazon Storefront: https://www.amazon.com/shop/mrsceo_jLTK Fashion Links: https://www.shopLTK.com/explore/MrsCEO_JInstagram: https://instagram.com/mrsceo_jInstagram: https://instagram.com/candidly_withcoffeeWeight Loss IG: https://instagram.com/@jsbodybootcampTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mrsceo_j

Think Diet Coke is a harmless swap for sugary soda? Think again. New research suggests this bubblyfavorite might be doing more behind the scenes — possibly altering your gut microbiome and tinkeringwith your blood sugar response. Before you crack open another can, discover what science says about the sweet deception of artificial sweeteners and how your “healthy” choice might not be so simple after all.Health Alternative of the WeekHealth Outrage of the WeekProduct Recall of the WeekHealthy Mystery of the WeekDr. Adam Brockman answers caller questions

Steven Gee is a London-based artist, curator, and founding Director of Piccalilli. In 2013 he graduated with a BA from the University of East London and in 2015, an MA in Painting from the Royal College of Art.In 2017 Steven subsequently co-founded the curatorial collective IKO (It's Kind Of hard to explain) alongside Corey Bartle-Sanderson and Oliver Durcan, curating exhibition across London, Margate and Hastings. Collaborating with and commissioning early career artists and writers in the UK, they were interested in viewership and challenging how artworks and exhibitions can be engaged with through fabricated specific framing devices (literal and conceptual) to house the artworks. Their projects rejected the showroom model of presenting pre-made artwork in white rooms, working closely with project participants to collaborate and build projects in line with a collective goal.In 2022, Steven co-founded and is current Director of Piccalilli. An artist-led initiative and gallery, supporting early career and under-represented artists by providing them with a supportive framework to develop their practices with ambition and experimentation at the fore. Through cultivating a supportive environment and concept collaboration, piccalilli aims to bridge a dialogue between artists, audiences, community and place.Now based in South Bermondsey, Piccalilli is a permanent space based in the Penarth Centre. Following an ethos where the space and programme are centred around the engagement of commissioned artworks, within a specific environment which acknowledges the architecture rather than ignore. Invited artists are supported to research, develop and realise projects over a dedicated period of time - a space for rumination and fermentation. As an artist, Gee's practice navigates the everyday and the absurd — he works across mixed media, sculpture, installation, painting, and recently bespoke jewellery, often incorporating unconventional materials like mayonnaise, teeth, energy drinks and everyday ephemera. His solo exhibitions — such as Sandwiched, Tasteful Thickness, and Every Time You Lick a Stamp, You're Consuming 1/10th of a Calorie — reveal a playful yet probing engagement with consumer culture, digestion, materiality, and texture.

On today's episode  I speak about receiving a core memory trigger while watching stand up. I forget that our parents didn't have youtube or even needed youtube because they had us, we were the entertainment. I might have also triggered a core memory for an innocent bystander because i recited a joke terribly. A joke about body figures lead to more people thinking I'm sexist, but i guess that's better than being a plagiarizer. I then speak on an after work hang out with co workers, and dealing with the long arm of the law after festivities. Fun times, fun times.(00:00 - 29:28)On the movie review section we talk about film movies and other things and give the worse takes. This week i speak about  “ Predator : Bad Lands, this movie was awesome. Let me relax it was good for what it was, it was on  and off lore but in a different way that was not the worse thing. This movie let us know that we really don't stand a chance against them one on one without weapons. The world was a predator in its own way, nothing on that planet was meant to be peaceful, everything is on attack mode. But what makes this movie dope we finally get to see things from the predators prospective. It was pretty dope, y'all should check it out.(29:29 - 42:58)I then jump into The Cool Report  where we discuss Donaldson Trump new financial proposals for all and it has us all scratching our heads. 50 year mortgage loans and 15 year auto loans. The math is not mathing and they're trying to tell us the answer is pretty simple PEMDAS. From there he goes on to tell us that America does not have a fat person ban, but do. Fat people from outside of the US are not welcome until they get in shape like I. Then we get into Walmart doing Walmart things, like selling racist clothing along side with essentials, only in America. (42:59 - 01:04:15)We then step into a segment where the listeners ask me 3 questions about myself or just randomness. A character wants to know what do i know about seasonal depression and too stop appropriating it, but i had to let them know what time it is. I live this life daily not seasonal. I then get asked about my latest hot take and it involves YNs and LBGTQ+. You tell me if my take is too far out there. Another character wants to know how i feel about the new AI app out now. It takes the likeness of people that you upload to servers, but most people are using decease folks, i blame Ironheart.   (01:04:16 - 01:19:32)Then we have 2 fans ask us a questions for PTL where we get asked the tough questions where we place ourselves in their shoes. A lover wants to know is this tough love or just love that's tough? His partner wants him to lose weight, so she's taking away his only organic meal, she is putting the kitty away and he's going to feel it, not really but you get it. Another lover cooked himself for answering a dumb hypothetical his girl presented. Now he finds hisself in the dog house, but with internet connection so he's not that bad. I could only ridicule him for answering honestly we all know the answer except for your girl.(01:19:33  - 01:31:07)THE FINThanks to everyone that shows us love and wish y'all the best on the journey called life. (01:31:08 - 01:33:55)please continue to like, share, comment and subscribe.PEACE OUT!!!! For questions to be answered on Part time lover please email @nospecialcharacterspod@gmail.comTIME CODEINTRO/ WHAT'S NEW - 00:00MOVIE REVIEW - 29:29THE COOL REPORT - 42:59ASK ME A QUESTION - 01:04:16PART TIME LOVER - 01:19:33OUTRO - 01:31:08

Check out Marek Health at https://marekhealth.com/syatt and get 10% OFF your first order using code: SYATTIn this episode of The Jordan Syatt Podcast, I shoot the breeze and answer questions from listeners with my podcast producer, Tony, and we discuss:- Listing calories on restaurant menus- Eating past fullness- How to say full in a calorie deficit- What to do when you reach your goal weight- Building muscle with medical issues- Rep ranges, internal pressure, and effective reps- Is it normal to only add 1-2lbs to the bar over 6-8 weeks?- Will cross-training hurt my lifts?- The real secret to building maximal strength- Losing 100lbs on my max deadlift- My favorite beers and Jim Carey movies- And more...Do you have any questions you want us to discuss on the podcast? Give Tony a follow and shoot him a DM on Instagram - @tone_reverie - https://www.instagram.com/tone_reverie/ I hope you enjoy this episode and, if you do, please leave a review on iTunes (huge thank you to everyone who has written one so far).Finally, if you've been thinking about joining The Inner Circle but haven't yet... we have hundreds of home and bodyweight workouts for you and you can get them all: https://www.sfinnercircle.com/

-How much does exercise contribute to calorie needs? -What's a DEXA scan (and what's good to know in the results?) -What exactly is a “healthy relationship” with food? Are you there? -Is there a 1:1 calorie intake vs burn effect to create energy equilibrium? - - - - - - Valley to Peak Nutrition Resources, Info, and Freebies

Welcome to the Mind Muscle Connection Podcast!In this solo episode, I dive into How to Get More Out Of Calorie Tracking (and Eventually Stop Doing It)I break down where people go wrong with calorie and macro tracking, why it stops working, and how to get more from it without becoming obsessive. I share the three core skills I help clients build so they can improve body composition, eat with structure, and eventually step away from tracking altogether. If you've ever wondered why tracking still isn't leading to results, this one's for you.If you're ready to stop treating MyFitnessPal like your food therapist and start building actual nutrition skills that last, this episode is a must listen.Let's talk about:IntroductionHow to get more out of calorie tracking3 key areas that make tracking more effectiveTracking vs. building awarenessFollow me on Instagram for more information and education: @jeffhoehn_FREE 30 Min Strategy Call: HEREBody Recomp Checklist 2.0 HERENutrition Periodization Masterclass: HEREHow You Can Work With Me?: HERECoaching application: HERE

IN US: Election night got us jazzed! Establishment Democrats got us not so jazzed! No more fatties in America, per the President. Also, intentional and accidental islamophobia!IN SPORTS: Trump infitrated the NFL and the fans said no thanks. All roads lead to bravo. 

Can you really lose weight and still eat out? Absolutely. In this episode, Lindsey shares her best tips for how to eat out on a calorie budget — without restriction, guilt, or blowing your goals. You'll learn how to plan ahead, make smart swaps, and shift your mindset so eating out becomes part of your lifestyle instead of something that derails your progress. What You'll Learn: ✅ How to plan ahead and "budget" calories like a pro ✅ The easiest way to build a balanced meal when eating out ✅ How to handle alcohol, appetizers, and dessert without overdoing it ✅ Why mindset matters more than macros when it comes to enjoying food ✅ How to stop feeling guilty for eating out and start feeling empowered If you've ever felt stressed, restricted, or guilty after a restaurant meal, this episode will help you finally find balance — and learn how to enjoy your favorite foods while still hitting your goals.

In this episode of the Total Fitness Bodybuilding Podcast, Lee Hayward and some of his Muscle After 40 students dive deep into the pros and cons of tracking your calories and how to reach your fat loss goals without feeling like you're constantly "on a diet." You'll learn real-world nutrition strategies that work in everyday life - whether it's family dinners, holiday meals, or eating out at restaurants - so you can stay consistent without going to extremes. Inside this episode, we discuss: ✅ When strict nutrition tracking helps - and when it can actually hold you back ✅ Why focusing on protein simplifies everything ✅ How to enjoy "off-plan" meals without guilt or setbacks ✅ The truth about caffeine, metabolism, and fat loss ✅ Why sustainable consistency always beats short-term perfection We also touch on the latest AI-powered tracking tools, flexible meal planning strategies, and simple systems for building long-term healthy eating habits that fit your lifestyle. If you've ever struggled to stick with a diet, stay consistent with tracking, or find the balance between discipline and freedom - this episode will show you how to cut through the noise and focus on what really works for lasting results. ============ If you'd like to learn more about the Muscle After 40 Blueprint Program, you can download a Free PDF ebook that explains the entire system including our 3 phase method for achieving a lean body re-composition at: https://leehayward.com/blog/muscle-after-40 E-mail: lee@leehayward.com

Episode Overview If you've ever tracked macros, calories, or points, chances are you've hit a point where it no longer felt empowering—it felt exhausting. In this episode, Jen and Annie open up about their own histories with tracking, why it worked until it didn't, and what actually helped them build a healthier relationship with food. They break down the major downsides of tracking, including mental fatigue, food anxiety, and the inability to trust your own body. You'll also learn about the two powerful internal cues—hunger and satiety—that helped them and thousands of women in Balance365 Coaching ditch the food obsession and build lasting habits. If you're wondering "but if I'm not tracking… what do I do?"—this episode is your answer. If you like what you hear in this episode, don't miss your chance to join us when we open enrollment to join Balance365! Add your name to our obligation-free waitlist, and we will waive the $199 registration fee. Click here to learn more. Key Points Why tracking macros or calories can feel so satisfying—and why that doesn't last The 3 most common downsides to food tracking (and what no one tells you about them) How hunger and satiety cues can help you regulate your eating naturally What to do if you're totally disconnected from your internal cues

What if getting fit didn't mean spending hours at the gym but just 21 minutes, twice a week? And what if the real secret to lasting health wasn't about your body at all, but about rewiring your brain? In this episode of the Productivity Smarts Podcast, host Gerald J. Leonard chats with PJ Glassey, fitness innovator and author of Cracking Your Calorie Code (Version 2). PJ shares how his breakthrough 21-minute workout combines endurance and strength training to create real, lasting results without the bulk or burnout of traditional routines. His method focuses on Complete Muscle Fatigue, helping you get stronger, leaner, and more energized in a fraction of the time. But as PJ explains, true transformation starts in the mind. He breaks down how our "toddler-like" subconscious runs the show and how we can retrain it using powerful brain tools like visualization, tapping (EFT), and mindful movement. Add in habits like clean eating and intermittent fasting, and you've got a roadmap for better focus, more energy, and deeper well-being. It's a refreshing, practical take on fitness that proves when your brain and body work together, productivity and life itself just feel easier.   What We Discuss [02:01] Meet PJ Glassey [04:07] PJ's fitness journey and methodology origins [08:58] Development of the 21-minute workout [11:38] How the 21-minute method works [13:28] Equipment and functional fitness [18:01] Accessing PJ's training and app [21:22] Mind-body connection and subconscious [24:03] Brain type test and personalization [25:37] Aligning the conscious, subconscious, and non-conscious [27:38] Meditation, visualization, and storytelling [31:00] Food, nutrition, and productivity [35:51] Fasting and brain health [37:35] Top five anti-aging and health habits [39:03] Tapping for emotional eating [42:13] How tapping works and resources [45:08] Closing remarks and where to find PJ   Notable Quotes [12:30] "if you're just doing endurance training, the muscle cells want to get smaller, to bring the capillaries closer to the nucleus. So that's why marathon runners look emaciated and power lifters are jacked." — PJ Glassey [21:47] "The subconscious is in charge of us and we can't ever stop that. That's the way it is. And the subconscious also operates at about the level of a three-year-old. So our toddler is in charge of us." — PJ Glassey [36:03] "For me, intermittent fasting is really more about brain health and mental clarity, and not having to be hungry."— PJ Glassey [37:40] "The top five things for anti-aging are the top five things for health: exercise, good nutrition, quality sleep, brain training, and relationships." — PJ Glassey [39:45] "Tapping is an amazing way to get rid of emotional eating, to stop the overeating habits, to even stop cravings." — PJ Glassey [40:06] "I probably tapped 300 different foods away and then to the point where you just don't want them anymore, which is amazing." — PJ Glassey   Resources PJ Glassey Website – Xgym.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/pjglassey Brain Type Test – https://braintype.me/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pjglassey/?hl=en Book – Cracking Your Calorie Code Version 2.0 Productivity Smarts Podcast Website - productivitysmartspodcast.com Gerald J. Leonard Website - geraldjleonard.com Turnberry Premiere website - turnberrypremiere.com Scheduler - vcita.com/v/geraldjleonard Kiva is a loan, not a donation, allowing you to cycle your money and create a personal impact worldwide. https://www.kiva.org/lender/topmindshelpingtopminds  

Today's an exciting day because I'm kicking off episode 1 of my new 6-part series, The Missing Piece: where we uncover what's really holding you back from seeing fat loss progress and how to fix it. Today's episode features one of the biggest "missing pieces" I see when working with clients when it comes to how big and filling their meals are versus their snacking habits. I'm walking you through the food audit red flags I see most as a Registered Dietitian, the rule of thumb I always live (and coach) by when it comes to calorie content in meals versus snacks, and the simple shifts you can make to stop letting "snacks" call the shots in your day and seriously accelerate your progress. By the end of this episode, you'll know exactly how to build meals that keep you full so you can boost your metabolism, ensure you're satisfied and stop unintentionally sabotaging your progress through snacks. 1:1 Coaching with Lauren and Our Team of Dietitians: HERE To connect with Lauren, click HERE Submit your question for advice from Lauren on the show HERE Take the free Weight Loss Personality Quiz HERE Shop Our Meal Plans HERE Get Support & Personally Work With Us HERE I hope you enjoy this episode and if you do, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Huge thank you to every person who has left a review thus far!  

If you've ever felt like being in a calorie deficit is exhausting, frustrating, or just not working anymore, this episode is for you. I break down why your current deficit might feel harder than it needs to. From using outdated numbers in MyFitnessPal to going too extreme with your calories-and what you can do to make fat loss actually sustainable.You'll learn:Why your past numbers don't fit your current metabolismHow to eat more volume without more caloriesThe role of fiber and food variety in keeping you full and regularSimple shifts to stay consistent through your fat loss phaseWhether you're in a dedicated fat loss season or just trying to be more aware without tracking every bite, this episode will help you make progress that feels easier, not harder! Do you feel like your metabolism has slowed down? Get my FREE course to truly learn how your body works so you can see long term success. Enroll here.Shop my FAVE things HEREWant access to exclusive content? Sign up for my newsletter here!

Body Love Binge Q&A with Julia - Fear, Fullness & Fat PhobiaIn this Q&A episode, Julia and I answer real questions from the Body Love Binge community. We dive into acting in alignment with your values, overcoming the "clean vs dirty" fullness association, panic zones in recovery, seeking external validation, and why guilt hits harder after eating.Key Quotes from the Episode:

In this week's episode, Kacy and Tyler talk about what low or no calories additions you can make to your diet to support your weight loss goals.

Have a message for Karena? She'd love to hear from you and share your comment or question on air!Leave Karena a voicemail: https://www.speakpipe.com/KarenaDawnWhat if one terrifying night became the catalyst for a lifetime of healing?In this powerhouse episode of The Big Silence, Karena sits down with Angelo Keely, co-founder and CEO of Kion, to unpack his extraordinary path—from a near-fatal stabbing at 16 to building a company rooted in simple, consistent habits that support both muscle and mood. Angelo breaks down protein (in plain English), and you'll learn how small, repeatable choices can stack up into real change. He also explains why essential amino acids and creatine are especially impactful as we age. If you've wondered how to protect muscle, sharpen your mind, or support mental health without going “all or nothing,” this one's for you.How Do We Build Muscle and Mood—At Any Age—With Protein, Aminos, Creatine, and Consistent Habits?Angelo shares the science and the systems that actually work, and how to choose one tiny action you can repeat every day for real impact.(00:01:00) What Kion Is—and Why Angelo Says You Don't “Need” ItPrinciple first, product second: Food comes first; EAAs are a targeted way to stimulate muscle protein synthesis with fewer calories.Non-workout days matter: EAAs still drive protein synthesis—even on rest days.Consistency > intensity: Angelo takes EAAs every morning (often with creatine) to “tell” his body to rebuild.Better together: Taking EAAs before training leverages increased blood flow for greater impact.(00:05:30) From Bad Trip to Bigger Life: Trauma, Accountability, and 20 Years of IntegrationThe turning point: A severe LSD episode led to assault and multiple stab wounds—sparking a decades-long healing journey.Whole-person recovery: Talk therapy, meditation, yoga, acupuncture, movement, and study.Daily rhythm: 15k steps, basic strength work, slow “zone-2” runs, and short family meditations.One thing rule: Pick one change you'll actually do every day; stack from there.(00:14:30) Protein 101: Why EAAs Can Beat Whey—and Whey Often Beats SteakEnergy vs. materials: Carbs/fats fuel; protein rebuilds tissues, enzymes, hormones, and neurotransmitters.Quality counts: Higher essential amino acid content + digestibility = stronger protein synthesis signal.Practical takeaway: EAAs can deliver the goal of protein (rebuild/retain muscle) with fewer calories—useful for fat loss without muscle loss.Aging advantage: As we age, we're less sensitive to protein; powders and EAAs become more useful.(00:31:30) Creatine & Women: Strength, Cognition, and Mood—Minus the “Bloat” MythHow it works: Creatine saturates muscle (and brain) phosphocreatine stores, making reps and sprints feel slightly easier—strength builds over time.Brain benefits: Higher intakes in studies have shown improvements in memory/focus; emerging research suggests better depression outcomes.Myth-busting: Quality creatine monohydrate doesn't cause true “bloat”; women tend to gain strength/endur­ance—not bulk.Dosage mindset: Daily use matters (not just on lift days). Pair with protein/EAAs and strength work for the compounding effect.(00:40:30) Weight Loss Without Muscle Loss: GLP-1s, Deficits & The Case for More Protein/EAAsThe risk: Calorie deficits (drug-assisted or not) can strip muscle unless protein/EAAs are substantially higher.Target outcome: Lose fat, keep muscle—use EAAs as a “cheat code” to shore up a...

SummaryIn this episode, Chase and Chris talk about two things that make fat loss a lot easier — protein and fiber. They explain how these two nutrients help you feel full, fight cravings, and make sticking to a calorie deficit much more doable.They share real client stories, helpful rules of thumb, and simple tips to eat more protein and fiber every day — without feeling overwhelmed or having to change your entire diet overnight.If you've ever struggled with hunger, cravings, or just can't seem to stick to your plan, this episode gives you practical tools to change that — starting today.Chapters(00:00) Two Keys to an Easier Fat Loss Journey(00:57) Why Protein Is So Filling (And How It Helps Cravings)(03:25) Protein's Fat-Burning Bonus: The Thermic Effect(05:20) How Eating “Good” All Day Can Backfire at Night(07:17) Building High-Protein Meals the Right Way(09:19) Pre-Tracking: The Underrated Game Changer(11:40) Shopping Smart: Stocking Up on Protein Staples(14:07) The “Add a Zero” Rule for Identifying Good Protein Sources(16:09) Rewiring the Way You Eat(18:06) What Real Progress Looks Like with Protein(19:05) Fiber: The Other Fat Loss MVP(20:27) High-Fiber Foods That Actually Keep You Full(21:41) Supplements: When They Help (And When They Don't)(24:38) Why Whole Foods Beat Shakes Every Time(25:31) Final Thoughts and Your Challenge This WeekSUBMIT YOUR QUESTIONS to be answered on the show: https://forms.gle/B6bpTBDYnDcbUkeD7How to Connect with Us:Chase's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/changing_chase/Chris' Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/conquer_fitness2021/Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/665770984678334/Interested in 1:1 Coaching: https://conquerfitnessandnutrition.com/1on1-coachingJoin The Fit Fam Collective: https://conquerfitnessandnutrition.com/fit-fam-collective

Check out Marek Health at https://marekhealth.com/syatt and get 10% OFF your first order using code: SYATTIn this episode of The Jordan Syatt Podcast, I shoot the breeze and answer questions from listeners with my podcast producer, Tony, and we discuss:- How to transfer from fat loss to maintenance- The truth about late night eating- How to apologize to your spouse- Superfoods for health- Do you need to eat specific health foods every day- Egg white protein powders- Sleep supplements- Tracking calories but still not eating in a deficit- Calorie cycling- Talking politics with family or on social media- Cutting weight for high school wrestling- And more...Looking for a reputable science-based source of supplements that don't hide behind "proprietary blends"?  Check out Legion Athletics (20% OFF YOUR FIRST ORDER WITH CODE "SYATT"):  https://legionathletics.com/products/supplements/ Do you have any questions you want us to discuss on the podcast? Give Tony a follow and shoot him a DM on Instagram - @tone_reverie - https://www.instagram.com/tone_reverie/ I hope you enjoy this episode and, if you do, please leave a review on iTunes (huge thank you to everyone who has written one so far).Finally, if you've been thinking about joining The Inner Circle but haven't yet... we have hundreds of home and bodyweight workouts for you and you can get them all: https://www.sfinnercircle.com/

Check out Marek Health at https://marekhealth.com/syatt and get 10% OFF your first order using code: SYATTIn this episode of The Jordan Syatt Podcast, I shoot the breeze and answer questions from listeners with my podcast producer, Tony, and we discuss:- The drama around my GLP-1 experiment- Dealing with bullies- What I really think about phentermine- Calorie cycling vs carb cycling- How to teach your kids about nutrition- Support groups for GLP-1 users- My favorite olive oil for health and enjoyment- And more...My Olive Oil: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09GMW63W1?ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_B4SP0TYW7Z4HWA0DMJX3Do you have any questions you want us to discuss on the podcast? Give Tony a follow and shoot him a DM on Instagram - @tone_reverie - https://www.instagram.com/tone_reverie/ I hope you enjoy this episode and, if you do, please leave a review on iTunes (huge thank you to everyone who has written one so far).Finally, if you've been thinking about joining The Inner Circle but haven't yet... we have hundreds of home and bodyweight workouts for you and you can get them all: https://www.sfinnercircle.com/