British chemist, biophysicist and X-ray crystallographer
POPULARITY
12 episodes with Rosalind Franklin
5 episodes with Rosalind Franklin
2 episodes with Rosalind Franklin
5 episodes with Rosalind Franklin
3 episodes with Rosalind Franklin
3 episodes with Rosalind Franklin
2 episodes with Rosalind Franklin
2 episodes with Rosalind Franklin
2 episodes with Rosalind Franklin
We all want to age well, so let's learn from those who already have. Emily Rogalski, Rosalind Franklin professor and Director of the Healthy Aging & Alzheimer's Research Care Center at the University of Chicago, delves into the secrets. Dr. Rogalski is the Rosalind Franklin Professor of Neurology and the Director of the Healthy Aging […]
Astronomy Daily | Space News: S04E76In this thrilling episode of Astronomy Daily, host Anna takes you on an exploration of the latest advancements and discoveries in our universe. From Europe's ambitious plans for Mars to groundbreaking developments in commercial spaceflight, this episode is filled with cosmic insights that will ignite your curiosity.Highlights:- Rosalind Franklin Rover's New Journey: Join us as we discuss the revitalization of the Rosalind Franklin mission, Europe's first Mars rover, which is back on track after overcoming significant obstacles. Learn about its unique drilling capabilities and the collaborative efforts that will help uncover potential signs of ancient life on Mars.- SpaceX's Infrastructure Expansion: Get the latest updates on SpaceX's construction of Orbital Launch Pad B and the ambitious GigaBay facility at Starbase. Discover how these developments will enhance SpaceX's production capabilities and support its future missions to the Moon and Mars.- X-Class Solar Flare: Uncover the details of a powerful X1.1 class solar flare that recently caused radio blackouts across the Americas. We discuss the implications of solar activity and why scientists are closely monitoring the sun for further eruptions.- The Venus Life Equation: Explore the intriguing Venus Life Equation, a new framework for assessing the potential for life on our neighboring planet, Venus. This innovative approach aims to deepen our understanding of planetary habitability and the search for extraterrestrial life.- Historic Fram 2 Mission: Meet the crew of SpaceX's Fram 2 mission, set to make history as the first human spaceflight to traverse Earth's polar regions. We delve into the mission's unique objectives and the pioneering spirit of its private astronaut crew.For more cosmic updates, visit our website at astronomydaily.io. Join our community on social media by searching for #AstroDailyPod on Facebook, X, YouTubeMusic, TikTok, and our new Instagram account! Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or wherever you get your podcasts.Thank you for tuning in. This is Anna signing off. Until next time, keep looking up and stay curious about the wonders of our universe.00:00 - Welcome to Astronomy Daily01:05 - Rosalind Franklin rover updates10:30 - SpaceX's infrastructure development17:00 - X-class solar flare impacts22:15 - The Venus Life Equation27:30 - Overview of the Fram 2 mission✍️ Episode ReferencesRosalind Franklin Mission Details[European Space Agency](https://www.esa.int)SpaceX Infrastructure Updates[SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com)Solar Flare Information[NASA Solar Dynamics Observatory](https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/)Venus Life Equation Insights[NASA](https://www.nasa.gov)Fram 2 Mission Overview[SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com)Astronomy Daily[Astronomy Daily](http://www.astronomydaily.io/)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news--5648921/support.
Este episodio de 4 horas en “El Siglo 21 es Hoy” se centra en “La mitad de la ciencia”, un recorrido por las historias menos contadas de las mujeres en la ciencia y la influencia que sus logros han tenido en la innovación tecnológica. Analizamos cómo los sesgos históricos, la brecha de género y la discriminación algorítmica siguen presentes en la inteligencia artificial y la transformación digital.Conversamos con Linda Patiño, periodista y colaboradora de Google, sobre la inclusión digital, la brecha salarial, la equidad de género y la forma en que estas desigualdades impactan la participación de las mujeres en STEM. El episodio aborda el efecto Matilda, los sesgos en la IA, la invisibilidad de grandes científicas y los esfuerzos por visibilizar sus contribuciones.Toda la investigación, guion, narración, edición y musicalización de este pódcast son de Félix Riaño. Agradecemos también a Eulalia Pérez Sedeño y S. García Dauder, cuyas investigaciones inspiraron este contenido. Toda la música usada ha sido autorizada con licencia Audiio y Creative Commons.Este espacio busca reflexionar sobre el impacto de la desigualdad en la construcción del conocimiento y la necesidad de inclusión para generar cambios en la ciencia y la tecnología. Conoce experiencias reales, analiza la forma en que las nuevas tecnologías reproducen estereotipos y descubre las oportunidades que surgen cuando se rompe con las narrativas tradicionales.Capítulos:00:00:00 155200:04:38 Las mentiras científicas00:07:50 Advertencias00:09:16 Por qué lo oímos en voz de hombre00:13:29 Marinela Profi https://youtu.be/CovLICpc8Eo00:15:39 Rosalind Franklin y la Fotografía 5100:26:23 Darwin y el androcentrismo00:31:29 Neuromito de los hemisferios del cerebro00:35:05 Completitud e incompletitud00:37:26 Auditivas y kinestésicos00:41:43 Sesgos00:50:04 Sesgos en MIT00:56:14 Segos en Amazon01:00:38 Manels01:08:57 Kristi Boyd y la ceguera de datos https://youtu.be/T3iKQs2oKk401:13:59 Lise Meitner01:28:30 El "cerebro pequeño" de las mujeres01:36:50 Exagerar y minimizar01:44:01 Sex in education01:47:31 Histeria01:56:39 Efecto Mateo02:06:32 ENIAC y el efecto Matilda02:15:33 Nettie Maria Stevens02:19:10 Botazzi, Maathai, Youyou02:20:52 María Teresa Toral02:23:21 Jocelyn Bell Burnell02:30:29 Linda Patiño: Cuotas de género https://youtu.be/d4HdIfVv89E02:46:19 Puentes, no trincheras 02:59:02 Yo era una guardaespaldas chiquita 03:13:50 Me dijeron que apagara el computador 03:29:17 No podemos seguir hablando los mismos con los mismos 03:45:25 ¿Qué estoy haciendo yo en mi casa?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/el-siglo-21-es-hoy--880846/support.
Este episodio de 4 horas en “El Siglo 21 es Hoy” se centra en “La mitad de la ciencia”, un recorrido por las historias menos contadas de las mujeres en la ciencia y la influencia que sus logros han tenido en la innovación tecnológica. Analizamos cómo los sesgos históricos, la brecha de género y la discriminación algorítmica siguen presentes en la inteligencia artificial y la transformación digital.Conversamos con Linda Patiño, periodista y colaboradora de Google, sobre la inclusión digital, la brecha salarial, la equidad de género y la forma en que estas desigualdades impactan la participación de las mujeres en STEM. El episodio aborda el efecto Matilda, los sesgos en la IA, la invisibilidad de grandes científicas y los esfuerzos por visibilizar sus contribuciones.Toda la investigación, guion, narración, edición y musicalización de este pódcast son de Félix Riaño. Agradecemos también a Eulalia Pérez Sedeño y S. García Dauder, cuyas investigaciones inspiraron este contenido. Toda la música usada ha sido autorizada con licencia Audiio y Creative Commons.Este espacio busca reflexionar sobre el impacto de la desigualdad en la construcción del conocimiento y la necesidad de inclusión para generar cambios en la ciencia y la tecnología. Conoce experiencias reales, analiza la forma en que las nuevas tecnologías reproducen estereotipos y descubre las oportunidades que surgen cuando se rompe con las narrativas tradicionales.Capítulos:00:00:00 155200:04:38 Las mentiras científicas00:07:50 Advertencias00:09:16 Por qué lo oímos en voz de hombre00:13:29 Marinela Profi https://youtu.be/CovLICpc8Eo00:15:39 Rosalind Franklin y la Fotografía 5100:26:23 Darwin y el androcentrismo00:31:29 Neuromito de los hemisferios del cerebro00:35:05 Completitud e incompletitud00:37:26 Auditivas y kinestésicos00:41:43 Sesgos00:50:04 Sesgos en MIT00:56:14 Segos en Amazon01:00:38 Manels01:08:57 Kristi Boyd y la ceguera de datos https://youtu.be/T3iKQs2oKk401:13:59 Lise Meitner01:28:30 El "cerebro pequeño" de las mujeres01:36:50 Exagerar y minimizar01:44:01 Sex in education01:47:31 Histeria01:56:39 Efecto Mateo02:06:32 ENIAC y el efecto Matilda02:15:33 Nettie Maria Stevens02:19:10 Botazzi, Maathai, Youyou02:20:52 María Teresa Toral02:23:21 Jocelyn Bell Burnell02:30:29 Linda Patiño: Cuotas de género https://youtu.be/d4HdIfVv89E02:46:19 Puentes, no trincheras 02:59:02 Yo era una guardaespaldas chiquita 03:13:50 Me dijeron que apagara el computador 03:29:17 No podemos seguir hablando los mismos con los mismos 03:45:25 ¿Qué estoy haciendo yo en mi casa?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/el-siglo-21-es-hoy--880846/support.
Este episodio de 4 horas en “El Siglo 21 es Hoy” se centra en “La mitad de la ciencia”, un recorrido por las historias menos contadas de las mujeres en la ciencia y la influencia que sus logros han tenido en la innovación tecnológica. Analizamos cómo los sesgos históricos, la brecha de género y la discriminación algorítmica siguen presentes en la inteligencia artificial y la transformación digital.Conversamos con Linda Patiño, periodista y colaboradora de Google, sobre la inclusión digital, la brecha salarial, la equidad de género y la forma en que estas desigualdades impactan la participación de las mujeres en STEM. El episodio aborda el efecto Matilda, los sesgos en la IA, la invisibilidad de grandes científicas y los esfuerzos por visibilizar sus contribuciones.Toda la investigación, guion, narración, edición y musicalización de este pódcast son de Félix Riaño. Agradecemos también a Eulalia Pérez Sedeño y S. García Dauder, cuyas investigaciones inspiraron este contenido. Toda la música usada ha sido autorizada con licencia Audiio y Creative Commons.Este espacio busca reflexionar sobre el impacto de la desigualdad en la construcción del conocimiento y la necesidad de inclusión para generar cambios en la ciencia y la tecnología. Conoce experiencias reales, analiza la forma en que las nuevas tecnologías reproducen estereotipos y descubre las oportunidades que surgen cuando se rompe con las narrativas tradicionales.Capítulos:00:00:00 155200:04:38 Las mentiras científicas00:07:50 Advertencias00:09:16 Por qué lo oímos en voz de hombre00:13:29 Marinela Profi https://youtu.be/CovLICpc8Eo00:15:39 Rosalind Franklin y la Fotografía 5100:26:23 Darwin y el androcentrismo00:31:29 Neuromito de los hemisferios del cerebro00:35:05 Completitud e incompletitud00:37:26 Auditivas y kinestésicos00:41:43 Sesgos00:50:04 Sesgos en MIT00:56:14 Segos en Amazon01:00:38 Manels01:08:57 Kristi Boyd y la ceguera de datos https://youtu.be/T3iKQs2oKk401:13:59 Lise Meitner01:28:30 El "cerebro pequeño" de las mujeres01:36:50 Exagerar y minimizar01:44:01 Sex in education01:47:31 Histeria01:56:39 Efecto Mateo02:06:32 ENIAC y el efecto Matilda02:15:33 Nettie Maria Stevens02:19:10 Botazzi, Maathai, Youyou02:20:52 María Teresa Toral02:23:21 Jocelyn Bell Burnell02:30:29 Linda Patiño: Cuotas de género https://youtu.be/d4HdIfVv89E02:46:19 Puentes, no trincheras 02:59:02 Yo era una guardaespaldas chiquita 03:13:50 Me dijeron que apagara el computador 03:29:17 No podemos seguir hablando los mismos con los mismos 03:45:25 ¿Qué estoy haciendo yo en mi casa?Conviértete en un seguidor de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/el-siglo-21-es-hoy--880846/support.
Deciphering the structure of DNA was as complex as the double helix itself. On 28th February, 1953, Dr. James Watson and Dr. Francis Crick rushed to the pub and announced to their fellow drinkers in The Eagle, Cambridge that they had just found “the secret of life”. But their work would not have been possible without the uncredited contribution of Dr. Rosalind Franklin - whose photographs of the X-ray diffraction pattern of DNA were the first to reveal its three-dimensional structure. And it was her colleague, Dr Maurice Wilkins, who first brought Franklin's work to the attention of Watson and Crick. In this episode, Arion, Rebecca and Olly consider how it came to be that Crick's wife, Odile; drew the iconic depiction of the structure published in Nature; explain why *technically* Dr Franklin didn't even have a degree; and recall how James Watson's legacy was tainted by his bitter and snide memoir, ‘The Double Helix'... Further Reading: • ‘Double-Helix Structure of DNA' (ThoughtCo, 2020): https://www.thoughtco.com/double-helix-373302 • ‘The Geek Atlas - 128 Places Where Science and Technology Come Alive, By John Graham-Cumming' (O'Reilly Media, 2009): https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Geek_Atlas/rXH0AQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=crick+watson+eagle+1953&pg=PA267&printsec=frontcover • ‘Rosalind Franklin: DNA's unsung hero - Cláudio L. Guerra' (Ted-Ed, 2016): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIP0lYrdirI This episode first aired in 2023 Love the show? Support us! Join
As Três celebram o Dia das Mulheres e Meninas na Ciência contando as histórias de Marie Curie, Ada Lovelace e Rosalind Franklin
Die beklauten Frauen und Dinge. Die Geschichte der Frauen in 100 Objekten Heute widmen wir uns einem ebenso spannenden wie aufwühlenden Thema: der Rolle der Frauen in der Geschichte. Mit den Büchern „Die Dinge – Eine Geschichte der Frauen in 100 Objekten“ von Annabelle Hirsch und „Beklaute Frauen“ von Leonie Schöller gehen wir auf eine Reise durch die Zeiten und decken auf, wie Frauen systematisch übersehen, ignoriert und benachteiligt wurden – und wie sie sich trotzdem ihren Platz in der Geschichte erkämpft haben. Eine Folge auch – oder gerade – für Männer!
Meeslepende roman over Rosalind Franklin, de ontdekker van het DNA die de mannenwereld trotseerde Uitgegeven door Mozaiek Spreker: Nienke Brinkhuis
On today's episode of The Wholesome Fertility Podcast, Caryn Johnson of @_bondlife shares her personal journey through infertility, detailing her struggles with unexplained infertility and the eventual discovery of autoimmune issues affecting her reproductive health. She emphasizes the importance of understanding the immune system's role in fertility and the impact of lifestyle factors such as diet, stress, and environmental toxins. Caryn advocates for women to take charge of their health by educating themselves and seeking out supportive healthcare practitioners. She also discusses her supplement line, Bond, which aims to address these issues holistically. Takeaways Caryn's journey began with unexplained infertility. She experienced multiple failed IVF attempts. The immune system plays a crucial role in fertility. Many women with unexplained infertility have underlying immune issues. Stress and lifestyle factors significantly impact reproductive health. Gut health is linked to fertility and autoimmune conditions. Caryn's research led her to create a supplement line, Bond. Advocacy and education are essential for women facing infertility. Environmental toxins can affect fertility outcomes. Women should empower themselves with knowledge about their health. Guest Bio: Caryn Johnson is the Co-Founder and CEO of BOND, an innovative line of supplements reimagining hormone and reproductive health, inspired by her experience with infertility. The former Vital Proteins Chief Marketing Officer launched BOND in the Fall of 2023, fusing her professional expertise with her passion to help women take a more proactive and empowered approach to caring for their cycle and reproductive health. In 2017, when trying to start a family, Caryn learned she was autoimmune infertile. What she discovered was a stark reality - the lack of open conversations and support for women facing similar struggles. The doctor's office often left much unsaid, and the information available was surprisingly scarce. Shocked by the limited support system in place, Caryn recognized the need for a change. She leaned on her industry knowledge and contacts to advocate for herself and uncover invaluable resources. Her personal journey became a catalyst for a larger mission to make her learnings accessible to women everywhere. It was this experience that led her to create BOND. A natural born innovator, Caryn is disrupting the marketplace with this new line of products that offers women the opportunity to take control of their reproductive health before it's too late. BOND's proprietary formulations, designed to preserve fertility potential and lay the foundation for a healthier body, feature science-backed ingredients that work together to balance hormones, protect egg health, and provide cycle support. With BOND, Caryn aims to address women's health more holistically and encourage a more proactive conversation around reproductive wellness. Caryn's career began in marketing and public relations where she worked with many notable beauty brands and PR firms before being recruited as the fifth employee at then startup, Vital Proteins. She was the first marketing hire at the organization and ultimately, became the company's Chief Marketing Officer leading the team through the brand's acquisition by Nestle Health Sciences. Following her tenure at Vital Proteins, Caryn took on the challenge of leading Owlet, a baby monitor company focused on preventing SIDS, where she served as Chief Marketing Officer and successfully guided the company through its initial public offering. Caryn lives in Chicago with her husband and two children Elijah and Ruthie. You can use coupon code THEWHOLESOME for 20% off all products. https://bond.life For more information about Michelle, visit: www.michelleoravitz.com The Wholesome FertilityFacebook group is where you can find free resources and support: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2149554308396504/ Check out Michelle's Latest Book: The Way of Fertility! https://www.michelleoravitz.com/thewayoffertility Instagram: @thewholesomelotusfertility Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thewholesomelotus/ Transcript: Michelle (00:00) Welcome to the podcast, Karin. Caryn Johnson (00:02) Thank you. Thank you for having me. Michelle (00:05) It's so nice to meet you. And I know that you do a lot of amazing work helping women I also know that you have your own story that you can share. And I would love to hear your story and really what got you inspired to do the work that you're doing. Caryn Johnson (00:21) Yeah, absolutely. So I'm here to share really the start of how I got to where I am today. And that really is rooted in finding out that I couldn't get pregnant. So we can start there and then we can get into all of the details together. But my husband and I met when I was young, early 20s. And by the time we got married many years later, we were already most right away to start having a family. There was a piece of me inside that knew that I was gonna have some sort of issue. I don't know, you already mentioned that you do visualizations to me before we started. So, you know, like I just had this feeling whether I manifested it for myself or not. I, you know, we did the full year of trying to get pregnant to no success and then went back to our doctor. Michelle (01:03) Yeah, yeah. Caryn Johnson (01:18) my typical OB-GYN and started the path of IUIs, did four IUIs, had beautiful eggs, each IUI, and reacted to the medicine quite well, but never got a positive from any of those. So we were recommended to move towards IVF. found a reproductive endocrinologist in Chicago, which is where I was located at the time. started the path to IVF and went through the process of an egg retrieval. Ended up seeing similar to what we saw in the IUIs, which was that my reproductive system performed quite well. And I was able, they were able to retrieve just about 30 eggs from one retrieval, which is quite high, borderline too high, but. just shows like the reaction to the medicine and the overall viability of my reproductive system. Of that, I had really normal odds and was able to bank close to 14, I believe, quality grade embryos. So I was really excited to move into implantation because at that point, I just really thought like whatever was unexplained is just kind of, you know, over to the side now. you know, all these things are just working out in my favor. So this is gonna be, you know, it for me, which a lot of women I feel like go into IVF feeling like the IVF center is like the place where you get your baby, which isn't always true. So. I started doing implantations and I started losing babies. Prior to that point, I had never even tested positive in any sort of like regard for a pregnancy test. And I wasn't one of those that, you know, jumped right off birth control, you know, to move into conception. I hadn't been on birth control for many, many, many, many years, you know, prior to this point. But the implantations started failing and My doctor said, this embryo was only attached for two hours, maybe a couple of hours is what they said. I just thought, how on earth, like why on earth would something attach for just a couple of hours and then that be the situation where It just doesn't work out from there. Like what is happening? And you know, got immediately, the immediate response was bad odds. You know, this happens, miscarriage happens. Just keep going. You know, one in four, in eight, you you get all the stats and there's definitely a piece of that when you're not working with really good quality embryos. But you know, I was, I knew that everything was genetically great. knew. and had no reason to believe that my body wasn't in working order to, you know, produce a pregnancy. So I just started pushing harder and getting a little bit more more fearful of continuing down the path of losing babies because I just, it hit me so hard. Even the loss of two hours, I mean, I just like, I've never felt sorrow like that. And I didn't, I just didn't feel like myself or really anyone should have to like continue down that path for like the sake of odds. So I started doing my own research and I was at the time experiencing some issues in my digestive system. I also now looking back had a definite cortisol issue. which relates into the picture, but I was a CMO at Vital Proteins at the time, which is that blue tub collagen company. And so I had a high stress level and I knew that something was going on in my digestive system. This was, you know, 2016, 2015, 2016, 2017. So. Michelle (05:39) yeah. Caryn Johnson (05:58) almost prior to when we really started, you know, as a world, as a community talking about the microbiome and gut health. But I sought out a naturopath who ended up doing a blood panel on me and told me that I had, you know, hundreds of food sensitivities, which is a a classic sign of gut dysbiosis, but at the time it wasn't translated back to like an issue in the microbiome. It was treated as like, yes, you have all of these, you have all of these issues with, you know, different foods, just avoid them. And that will be the solve versus, why do you have like, you know, why do you have a hundred things that you can't eat? Michelle (06:42) Hmm. Caryn Johnson (06:46) like watermelon seeds up to your typical gluten, et cetera. So I just started doing my own research online and I found a book called, Is My Body Baby Friendly? It's written by Dr. Alan Beer, who is now deceased, but it's over 700 pages of the science of how the immune system works with your reproductive system, your hormones, et cetera. in order to effectively procreate or in order for conception and implantation to occur. And that's when I realized there was something greater going on in my body outside again of just my reproductive system that we just hadn't figured out yet. So I read the book Front to Back. It's a very science heavy book. So I had to do a lot of like thinking about new terms and figuring and trying to remember what I was learning. At the end of the book, there was a recommendation at the time, there are more doctors now, but at the time for three doctors that practice this type of medicine, which is the field of reproductive immunology. And so, Michelle (08:01) Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (08:03) One of those doctors, Dr. Joanne Kwok-Kam of Rosalind Franklin ended up being in my backyard essentially 45 minutes away in the Chicago area. So I took that as a sign that I needed to call and get additional help above and beyond my RE who was doing the IVF. And I called over there and was immediately put on a six month wait list. So proceeded with the next round of IVF because I was already on some hormones. So I was already going through the round. I had at that point only done my own research. So I wasn't really sure what was going on in my body or if I could believe what I had read because my doctors that were helping me with the IVF weren't really like saying that They believed in the immunology side of things. They hadn't seen enough research, et cetera. So I wasn't really getting support on what I was researching. So it was around the holidays, October-ish, when I ended up calling into the clinic and I ended up getting a call right around Thanksgiving that they had a cancellation and I got moved up on the wait list. So I ended up getting into the reproductive immunology clinic many months before they said I would two weeks before my next IVF transfer and that was just an awesome Hail Mary. They did a full ultrasound. So tip to toe thyroid, you know, your whole stomach area inside and outside. And then they do the craziest blood panel that I've ever done. don't know how you can even draw that much blood, but vials and vials of blood to look at immune markers in addition to hormone markers, vitamin markers, and your typical blood panel. And they called me back 48 hours later and said, need to cancel this implantation. You have the highest level of antibodies that we've ever seen. not that we've ever seen, but that we're able to track. So you're past like where the chart goes essentially. So if you proceed with your implantation, it's almost definitely gonna end in a miscarriage because your body is gonna fight it off. And at that point I was terrified because that was like the first real something's actually wrong with you that I had heard. Michelle (10:21) wow. Wow. Caryn Johnson (10:50) Everything else was just unexplained, unexplained, unexplained. And I just went into shock. I didn't know what to do. I didn't know who to believe. You know, I had two sets of doctors saying different things. So I proceeded with the implantation and I ended up implanting both a boy and a girl embryo. And then started treatment right away on my immune system through the reproductive immunologist. So what they did was they put me on a series of pretty intense medications to quiet my immune system. And then I did what is called IVIG, which are blood transfusions or infusions that essentially look to wash your blood of the antibodies that are over protecting the immune system. So I went into this protocol and I ended up getting pregnant. It was positive right away. we saw, so the clinic ended up treating me one to three times a week with this IVIG infusion, which they're about two to three hours long based on, they're based on body weight. Michelle (11:50) Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (12:14) I was in their office, you know, at least one to two times a week, also for an ultrasound. So I knew by five weeks that both embryos had attached. you know, at that point, my immune markers were even more all over the place. We couldn't get my immune system to a stable level by any means. And I ended up losing the girl embryo at seven weeks. her heartbeat slowed and then ultimately it stopped, which is one of the symptoms or issues when you have an autoimmune issue going into a pregnancy. So, you know, that was so sad and devastating and she was higher up in the womb than the boy embryo. So at that point, It was pretty much 50-50 odds of if she was going to end up coming out and bringing him with her or if she was going to be what's called a vanishing twin, which is when your body reabsorbs the pregnancy for the sake of the other pregnancy, which is really the best case scenario because then you don't lose the other baby. Michelle (13:18) my gosh. Caryn Johnson (13:36) I was put on bed rest. This was the start of my bed rest between six and seven weeks, which continued until I gave birth, basically. I was able to go to work, but that was pretty much it. And I lived in fear that we were going to lose a little boy, but I ended up reabsorbing the girl embryo. So she never came out and we just really aggressively treated my immune system. which held on until 34 weeks when I went into basically how the immune system works during the pregnancy is during the first trimester, there is more inflammation that can be in the body and then it has to subside for the second trimester to continue successfully and then your inflammation increases and that's eventually causes or is part of why you go into labor. But my inflammation and my immune system increased really fast. my water broke early and I ended up having him, you know, early but he was healthy because some of the immune medications included steroids. So he was a little bit bigger than, you know, your typical 34, 35 weaker. But I was able to carry my son and that really started my story of what the heck happened and why is autoimmunity so under researched when it comes to your reproduction and your fertility chances and how can I actually do more now that I have my children here. Michelle (15:06) Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (15:33) to support other women so they don't have to go through this amount of trauma, right? But also this amount of like research and advocacy for themselves because at the end of the day, like we just can't expect that from everyone and we shouldn't. We should be able to support. Yeah, so I'll take a breath there. Michelle (15:40) Mm-hmm. Yeah. Wow, that's incredible story. And I mean, it's it's mind boggling, you know, that, nobody really talks about something that is so prevalent. And I do see that a lot, actually. And it could be the reason why you have unexplained infertility or why transfers don't work. And I speak to Amy Ralph, Amy Ralph, she's a Caryn Johnson (16:19) Yeah. Michelle (16:20) she does the same thing, Chinese medicine. And she talks about this a lot. She says, if you miscarry or you have repeated transfer failures with a good embryo and your doctor doesn't look into like what your lining is doing and how your immune system is working, then go to a different doctor because it's so important to look into that because you could spend so much time. and you can spend so much money and just so many precious years going through so much loss for something that could be treated but can also be prevented. So I'd love to actually get your input on what you've discovered and how the gut relates to it but maybe other things that you've noticed or learned for the listeners. Caryn Johnson (16:59) Absolutely. Yeah, absolutely. And I think what you're saying is just incredibly important. Like the immune system, I feel like is the secret starting point to a lot of issues. And what's happening in medicine right now is a lot of women are walking away with an unexplained infertility diagnosis, but they're accepting that as a diagnosis, right? When it's not, it's just, it's not an answer. And if you look underneath kind of that answer, you see a lot of crazy statistics, such as over 65 % of women who have unexplained infertility actually have an issue in their immune system. And then similarly over 60 % have an issue in their metabolic system. So blood sugar, insulin, know, early signs of PCOS, et cetera. And then. Michelle (18:05) You Caryn Johnson (18:10) When you look, you see that there are deep, deep nutrient deficiencies happening in this group of women as well. So you're looking at vitamin D deficiencies, vitamin B deficiencies, magnesium, omegas. All of these start with modulations that occur in the immune system as well. So when you think about it on a deeper level and from the research that I've done, Michelle (18:23) Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm, yeah. Caryn Johnson (18:39) you're looking at something that's happened to you before it's affecting your hormones and triggering one of these other issues in your reproductive system. So like for instance, not only do I have, you know, autoimmune infertility, I do carry PCOS and adenomyosis as well. And for me, and based on the research that I've done, those are secondary factors. to my immune system modulating and creating an overly inflammatory environment in my body, which then produced those issues. So we're not going up far enough in the chain of our bodies as to understanding our full systems. And again, it kind of goes back to like what's happening in medicine, which is that our doctors are Classically trained in our reproductive organs, right? So they know our uterus they know our ovaries they understand how those work, but we need to get into you know, a new phase where we have Practitioners that understand how all of the systems are working together in our body Including our immune system and our endocrine system because they do have such a big and almost starting impact Michelle (19:57) Mm-hmm. Yeah. Caryn Johnson (20:07) on what's happening with our fertility. Michelle (20:10) yeah, I completely agree. And I also I'm wondering, like, what have you seen? Because I think that when you talked about the food sensitivities, you were saying that it's okay, I'm allergic to so many things, or I'm sensitive to so many things, but why? So like, what are the things that you've seen that cause it to begin with? Caryn Johnson (20:28) Yeah. Yeah. So there are a couple of things that I see as a starting factors. One is overall stress. So if you can't keep your stress in check, you can't keep your cortisol levels in check, then your adrenal function will not perform in the rest of your hormones will not function correctly, which then trickles into some of these other problems. and then you get into other factors like what you're putting in your body. the nutrition that you have or you don't have. They're saying the American diet is still between 60 and 80 % processed food. So we're putting still mostly junk into our systems that's modulating and creating these environments that we don't want. Number three is dysbiosis of the gut, right? Which is a huge factor in Michelle (21:13) Mm-hmm. Yeah. Caryn Johnson (21:31) overall well-being and then your chances at fertility because what happens is that if your gut is in dysbiosis, your mucosal lining is disrupted and all of the toxins that are supposed to be in this like, think of it like pipe in your body, piped to get to the outside are now permeating that pipe and moving into your system and causing again, these major inflammation issues. these, this uproar of immune response that is hard to counteract. You know, once you have that level of bacteria and then toxins that are entering the bloodstream. And then the last kind of reason that you would be kind of in this situation is just based on what's going on in your environment. So are you living in a city, you know, that a lot of people in Detroit, for instance, there's a bigger rate of infertility there versus, you know, your non-city residents. It's also based on the toxins that enter your home. So are you getting rid of your plastics? Are you looking at the cleaning supplies you're using, the makeup you're putting on your face? It seems simple, but this toxic overload, again, Michelle (22:52) Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (22:55) creates this inflammatory response, which modulates your immune system. So those are really the four categories that kind of put you in this place. And then it kind of gets into epigenetics, which is like, you know, you've created this new world for yourself that your body has become. And, you know, is it going to be like that or are you going to be able to get yourself out of it? Michelle (23:23) Yeah. my God. It's so important and it's true. We hear all the different factors and actually those toxins and the endocrine disruptors can be found in food, I mean, through pesticides and that can also impact your gut dysbiosis. so it's just, it's like an entangled web and it really is like a reflection of how we're living today and what's allowed in this country, which Caryn Johnson (23:38) Yeah. Yeah. Michelle (23:50) I'm starting to get more and more frustrated with, you know, the fact that other countries are protecting their citizens more from chemicals and pesticides and things that are harming not only our health and chronic disease, also future. it's, it's unbelievable. And for that reason, I often tell people just go gluten free. It's not that. Caryn Johnson (23:58) Yeah. Gosh, get me started on glyphosate. It's so sad. Mm-hmm. Michelle (24:16) It's not that wheat is bad. And actually, as a matter of fact, a lot of people don't have those same responses if they go to Spain or Italy, even though it's not considered GMO, they have genetically modified it over the years. So there's so many aspects. So sometimes I'm just like, just remove it, And I see people feeling a lot better. Caryn Johnson (24:26) Right. Yeah. Michelle (24:41) just from that, and especially with autoimmune conditions, actually that like going gluten free can really help. That's what I've seen. Caryn Johnson (24:50) Yeah, no, definitely. It's just our food source is really sad. And it's just, it's so hard to pinpoint at the end of the day because no one really has the exact answer. But I just like, you see the data, like women who are eating on a Mediterranean diet have a lower risk of endometriosis. Michelle (24:55) Yeah. Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (25:15) women who have like vitamin sources through green leafy vegetables don't have as much PMS. So like the correlations are there. It's just like, how do we get people to make better decisions for their body and understand like, don't be me, don't make bad decisions and then get into a position where you can't have the life that you wanted or dreamed of, or you have to fight so hard for it because Michelle (25:16) Right. Yes. Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (25:43) of choices you made earlier in your life from lack of knowledge, you know? Michelle (25:47) Right. Yeah, totally. And then I also look at the nervous system, which is what you're, I feel like it's really linked to the cortisol issue, like the high stress, because we're constantly being bombarded with too much information. Really, I think too much information that our nervous system is able to translate. And I think that takes a trickle down effect into our bodies. I'm very big on like mind body because of that, you know, like that, that's one aspect, but of course, I mean, there's so many Caryn Johnson (26:02) Mm-hmm. Yeah. Michelle (26:16) Like I said, it's like a web and every single piece matters. And that's what you were talking about before with medicine, looking at the body as a whole, as a functioning system, rather than just one part. Caryn Johnson (26:21) you Right, right. And just going back to your comment on cortisol, you know, a lot of it does start with cortisol because if you put yourself into too high of a cortisol state, your body doesn't produce enough hormones. It basically triggers all of your other hormones to act inappropriately. It goes into your progesterone receptor. Michelle (27:00) Mm-hmm. Yeah. Caryn Johnson (27:00) pretends it's progesterone and then it goes on your thyroid and says slow down, slow down. Your body doesn't have enough energy for this and your thyroid slows. So it's really like easy to dismiss like, yeah, I'm so stressed but I don't have to be stressed today and to understanding like if your body is in a constant state of stress, like the impact it can truly have on your system and on your hormones because Michelle (27:27) Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (27:30) I guess also people think of like cortisol is like over here and then estrogen and progesterone as like over here because they work through different axes of the body, right? But it's all related because if you knock one off, you're messing with the others. So I just, I wish people ultimately would understand that cortisol is a huge starting factor to their fertility journey as well. Michelle (27:38) Mm-hmm. Right. Yes. Caryn Johnson (27:57) and to a hormone journey if they're not on the road to fertility. Michelle (28:02) Yes, because ultimately the body's always going to favor survival. And when you're in high cortisol, your body's basically or something is signaling your body to let it know it's not safe. So when you're constantly in this state of feeling unsafe, your body's going to worry about other things and put off other factors that it would normally pay attention to when you do feel safe. Caryn Johnson (28:08) Yeah. Right. Michelle (28:32) And being in this chronically is just not conducive to high vitality period. Caryn Johnson (28:32) Right. Yeah, I feel like at least we're in a better state of mind, like as a world where, you know, 10 years ago it was chic and cool to be like chronically stressed and like drinking like three cups of coffee in the morning and like running yourself ragged. Like I feel like everyone understands a little bit more that they shouldn't. It's just about like knowing your body and actually being able to say to yourself like, no, this isn't how I should. Michelle (28:52) It's true. Yeah, that's a good point. Yeah. Caryn Johnson (29:09) be feeling. This isn't how I want to keep stress or maintain like my day-to-day life. Michelle (29:17) No doubt that we are getting educated like never before. like, it's, it's one of those things that when like the information comes out and we start to open our eyes, it's painful because we're realizing things that are not working. However, even though it's painful, it's actually helping us in the long run. And it's kind of like the, blessing and the curse of social media and all of the technology, but the blessing is information. Caryn Johnson (29:28) Right. Yeah. Michelle (29:45) that is very important for us to know it's important for us to receive. So that aspect of it is really important. And then talk to us about your supplement product bond. And I know that you created that based on really your own frustration and it's become your baby. And I want to know what specifically or how does that address autoimmunity conditions for people who are going through that or? Caryn Johnson (30:03) Yeah. Michelle (30:14) least thinking maybe to look into their immunity in regards to their fertility, listening to this. Caryn Johnson (30:21) Yeah, absolutely. So I launched Bond just about a year ago. I concepted it. took a year prior to that from concept to launch. So really it started in the world of advocacy for me. I was just really looking to help other women getting involved in some Facebook groups, some communities. you know, there's not a lot of knowledge, a lot of people talking about this yet. There certainly wasn't, you know, even just a few years ago. so I, I took a speaking opportunity in Detroit and I went to Wayne State University, which is where they do a lot of the research for autoimmune infertility. the main head of that clinic asked me to come and speak to the researchers because they do all of this research and it's isolated into their facility. They don't actually see the impact of what's going on with women who are going through this. Michelle (31:24) Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (31:25) so I got to share my story and, you know, had a really nice day there learning and seeing their facility, their lab, what's going on. And on the drive home is really when it clicked for me that there's a lack of, or there's a gap in what's going on research wise and, know, what's being discussed and what's being carried out and brought to. the consumer or the public's attention. And I just felt like if I didn't take a larger stand to do something bigger to help women, that we'd be many, many more years behind even. So I went back to my house in Chicago, sat in my basement and did just clinical research for months. And I logged over 300 clinical studies, all centered around the immune system and how it relates to hormones to the reproductive system and built my thinking for original skews, which were, which are daily balance, which is our best seller conception boost, vitality, and cycle care on this thinking first. so it really started with research before it was brought forward to healthcare practitioners and then formulated out. And a lot of the research that went into each of the products is above and beyond supporting the reproductive organs. So when you look at daily balance as a whole, it has 15 vitamins and nutrients in it. And a lot of those vitamins and nutrients were chosen to not only support hormone balance, but to take that up a level and to support the immune system as it relates to being a predecessor to hormone balance. So adding a vitamin D, which is a huge hormone regulator, putting fiber, five grams of it into a supplement so that women are potentially protecting their gut lining better and producing those short chain fatty acids that are going to protect their gut in a way that just probiotics don't. Adding in a probiotic blend that we studied as being healthy strains, or not healthy strains, but strains from healthy fertile women. So really focusing on these immune factors and how they pull into the world of fertility. But to the public now, you know, almost simplifying that message and making it more of like the underlying theme because we're still not necessarily totally there. so the ingredients exists in these formulas with so much thinking and thought as it relates to the whole body. and then the formulas come out and, they're focused on hormone balance, right? As well as we have a conception product, and then we have our cycle care product, which is focused on, PMS support. So PMS, symptom alleviation, and then hormone detoxification. Michelle (34:16) Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (34:44) So they all have an immune angle, also address a hormonal need. And the other great thing too is that you can shop at a discount as a special thanks for listening to us here. You can head over to the link. We'll link it here with this podcast episode and use the code, the wholesome to get 20 % off your order. Michelle (34:54) Awesome. And do you have information on your site, just like support for people wanting to learn more? Caryn Johnson (35:00) Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. we're starting to add more and more to our site. I wrote a white paper on how the microbiome affects fertility that you can download off of our website as well to get more information. And yeah, we share a lot on social too with, you know, article connections there. So that's another great way to keep up with kind of like up and coming research that we're seeing. Michelle (35:32) Mm-hmm. Caryn Johnson (35:33) But yeah, I would say too, just going back to one other thing you mentioned earlier on the, on the doctor front, the best thing to do as a consumer, like when you're hitting these issues is to bring the articles in and show them to your doctor and choose advocacy for yourself. Because I found that the response from them is far greater when you have data in your hands as to why you want to. Michelle (35:51) Mm-hmm. Yeah. Caryn Johnson (36:03) add a supplement, think about a different form of medication, think about a different program that might make sense for your system. So I would say, you know, that is as important as ever. And, you know, what we try to do more and more is link that PIMD article, like when we post something so that you can find the actual source and see for yourself, you know? Michelle (36:24) Mm-hmm. Yeah. Caryn Johnson (36:31) read the information and make smart decisions. Michelle (36:31) Mm-hmm. I love that. That's great. I'm all about empowerment. think that we need a lot of that now. So this is great information. I really appreciate you sharing your story for people listening. And for people who want to find you and learn more, how can they find you? Caryn Johnson (36:41) Yeah. Thank Sure, so our website is bond.life. Our Instagram is underscore bond life and we're, you know, a newer company. I'm still really involved on our social. So we love to take DMs and interact with people one-on-one that way. If you have any questions or want to get into, you know, what you might be experiencing and what our different products are, like we're happy to get into it with you and. I will say for anyone that wants to shop on bond on our website, absolutely love to support you. And again, really the place to start with, with us is our daily balance product. has the baseline of nutritionals you need to support your nutrients stores, your hormonal balance, and of course, your immune system. that is our purple bag on the website there. But Michelle, thank you so much for having me. I really appreciate this opportunity. Michelle (37:57) Yeah, it was great having you on and having this conversation, which I feel like is so important because it is kind of like the big question mark that a lot of people are facing when they're trying to conceive. So thank you so much for coming on. Caryn Johnson (38:09) Yeah, you're welcome.
Rosalind Franklin was a brilliant yet underappreciated scientist whose work was instrumental in one of the greatest scientific breakthroughs of the 20th century - the discovery of the DNA double helix. Often overshadowed in the history books, Rosalind's meticulous research in X-ray crystallography paved the way for the understanding of DNA's structure, yet her contributions went largely uncredited during her lifetime. We explore Rosalind's journey from her early education in England to her groundbreaking work at King's College London. We'll discuss her pivotal Photograph 51, which revealed the DNA double helix's structure and the circumstances around how her data was shared without her consent. We'll also highlight her character, scientific rigor, and resilience in a male-dominated field, as well as her impactful work on the structures of viruses before her untimely death. Follow us on IG: @homance_chronicles Connect with us: linktr.ee/homance Send us a Hoe of History request: homancepodcast@gmail.com
Jessica Mills is a journalist who has written for The Wall Street Journal and The Independent. Today, we'll be discussing her debut novel, The English Chemist. It is based on the life of pioneering scientist Rosalind Franklin whose imaging work in capturing the structure of DNA was sidelined and buried by Frances Crick and John Watson who won the Nobel Prize in 1952 and did not credit Franklin. The English Chemist is published by Pegasus Books which is distributed by Simon and Schuster.
Since the discovery of the double helix by Francis Crick, James Watson and Rosalind Franklin in the 1950s, human knowledge of DNA and genetics has grown almost immeasurably. We now know that genes affect every aspect of our lives, from our appearance, our health and even our personality. But more than this, our genes are a living document of our evolutionary past, an ancient document that, if read properly, can reveal almost everything about how we came to be how we are. In this episode, we're joined by the evolutionary biologist and multi-million selling author Richard Dawkins to speak about his latest book The Genetic Book of the Dead: A Darwinian Reverie. He tells us how different species of animals hit on the same evolutionary strategies despite being separated by multiple continents, how natural selection doesn't necessarily always follow the perfect path and how a scientist of the future may one day be able to read the genetic code of any living animal like a book to uncover its entire evolutionary past. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Charles Darwin's revolutionary observations of Galapagos tortoises and finches, explored how natural selection allows species to adapt over time. From the discovery of the hawk moth in Madagascar, predicted by Darwin, to the groundbreaking discovery of DNA by Rosalind Franklin, Francis Crick, and James Watson, we look at how genetic changes drive evolution. Please consider becoming a show Patron to help keep new episodes coming! Evolution Talk is also a book! You can find links to Amazon, Barnes & Noble and others on the front page of EvolutionTalk.com, or call your local bookstore and ask them to order a copy. Music in this Episode Bright White by Podington Bear, License (CC BY 3.0): Artist website: soundofpicture.com Stars are Out by Podington Bear, License (CC BY 3.0): Artist website: soundofpicture.com
Dans les années 1950, au King's College de Londres, la scientifique britannique Rosalind Franklin (1920-1958) est la première à comprendre la structure hélicoïdale de l'ADN. D'autres s'attribueront pourtant cette découverte. Dans un récit inédit en partenariat avec Madame Figaro, Virginie Girod vous raconte le parcours d'une scientifique dont le nom et l'action ont été injustement oubliés.https://madame.lefigaro.fr/ Thèmes abordés: ADN, biologie, Nobel, spoliation Au Cœur de l'Histoire est un podcast Europe1.- Présentation : Virginie Girod- Production : Armelle Thiberge et Morgane Vianey- Réalisation : Nicolas Gaspard- Composition des musiques originales : Julien Tharaud et Sébastien Guidis- Promotion et coordination des partenariats : Marie Corpet- Visuel : Sidonie Mangin Bibliographie : Virginie Girod, "Les ambitieuses, 40 femmes qui ont marqué l'histoire par leur volonté d'exister", M6 Éditions, 2020.
Dario Iubatti"Parlare bène"Appunti di dizione di un attoreGraphe Edizioniwww.graphe.itLa storia di quella che nel linguaggio comune chiamiamo “pronuncia” è variegata e dipende da una complessità di fattori linguistici, storici e politici. Molti di noi, tuttavia, oggi non fanno troppo caso – e invece dovrebbero! – alla distinzione fra pésca e pèsca, a meno che non studino recitazione teatrale. Proprio a costoro si rivolge il saggio, ma il destinatario ideale rientra in realtà in un ventaglio ben più ampio: le situazioni professionali e ricreative in cui dobbiamo utilizzare la voce e, di conseguenza, scegliere come pronunciare le parole sono numerose e talvolta determinanti per le nostre vite.Anche chi studia la lingua italiana dal punto di vista storico e filologico troverà informazioni utili e bene organizzate.Per ogni argomento sono indicate in modo estremamente dettagliato e preciso regole ed esempi sull'uso corretto di vocali e consonanti, sugli omografi e omofoni, sugli errori tipici dovuti alla propria cadenza regionale o a difetti di “pigrizia” espressiva.In chiusura, oltre 40 pagine di esercizi pratici di dizione e lettura ad alta voce.Un valore aggiunto: all'interno di questo vademecum di norme e delle relative eccezioni emerge con vivace concretezza la natura elastica ed evolutiva della dizione, che (così come la lingua, e l'umanità stessa) non è mai statica.Dario Iubatti si diploma all'Accademia d'Arte Drammatica Silvio d'Amico, dove ha lavorato con Michele Placido, Eimuntas Nekrosius, Luca Ronconi, Valerio Binasco. Terminata l'Accademia ha lavorato con Carlo Cecchi in varie produzioni tra cui Sogno di una notte d'estate, La dodicesima notte e Sik-Sik, l'artefice magico, con Giorgio Barberio Corsetti ne L'histoire du soldat e Le rane, con Mario Martone (Serata a Colono) e con Filippo Dini sia in Rosalind Franklin, il segreto della vita, che nell'ultimo allestimento pirandelliano prodotto dal Teatro Stabile di Torino, Così è se vi pare andato in scena anche a Pechino.Attualmente fa parte della compagnia di Marche Teatro diretta da Carlo Cecchi e lavora assiduamente con il Teatro Stabile di Torino.Ha recitato in alcuni film e fiction come Martin Eden, Il Commissario Ricciardi 2, Il Boemo.Ha fondato la Compagnia Teatrale NoveZeroSei a Ortona nell'ottobre 2021 che oltre a produrre spettacoli si occupa di alta formazione attoriale organizzando corsi in Abruzzo con insegnanti delle scuole del Teatro Stabile di Genova, dell'Accademia d'Arte Drammatica Silvio d'Amico di Roma, di molte scuole di recitazione romane, oltre che con attori noti come Laura Morante.Nell'estate del 2023 diventa creatore e direttore artistico del Festival del Mare che vede nella sua prima edizione proprio la partecipazione di Laura Morante ed Eugenia Costantini.Nel 2024 è impegnato con una nuova produzione del Teatro Stabile di Napoli diretto da Lino Musella. IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.it Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.
In this week's episode Mollie and Jorja explore the life and controversy of British Scientist Rosalind Franklin who's work helped discover the structure of DNA. The girls also discuss the men who took the credit and the history of women in STEM.
Rosalind Franklin, Ada Lovelace et Mary Sidney : ces noms vous disent quelque chose ? Depuis plusieurs années, de plus en plus de projets mettent en lumière le travail de ces femmes créatrices. Leur but : visibiliser le matrimoine, soit les biens culturels qu'elles nous ont légués. Mais à quoi ça sert de le rendre visible? Décryptage avec Aurore Evain, metteuse en scène et chercheuse, et Carla Caucotto, médiatrice culturelle chargée des Journées du Matrimoine de Lausanne. Pour aller plus loin : Mary Sidney alias Shakespeare : l'œuvre de Shakespeare a-t-elle été écrite par une femme ? Aurore Evain, Editions Talents Hauts Mémoires : Genève dans le monde colonial, Musée d'ethnographie de Genève, jusqu'au 5 janvier 2025 Les Journées du Matrimoine, organisées par l'Association Sujettes du 20 au 22 septembre 2024 à Lausanne. Journaliste: Mathilde SalaminRéalisateur Nous écrire : pointj@rts.ch ou +41 79 134 34 70 (WhatsApp)
L'émission 28 Minutes du 28/05/2024 La physicienne Élisabeth Bouchaud réhabilite sur scène les oubliées de la science "Les filles d'aujourd'hui qui veulent faire des sciences n'ont aucun modèle [...] il est important de montrer en quoi ces [femmes] scientifiques sont géniales et de s'interroger sur les mécanismes qui les ont conduites aux oubliettes de l'histoire". Au début des années 1950, Rosalind Franklin, alors jeune biologiste et physicienne, est la première à déceler la structure en double hélice de l'ADN. De son incroyable découverte, elle ne tirera aucune gloire : son travail lui est volé par trois de ses homologues masculins. Pour réparer cette injustice, Élisabeth Bouchaud lui consacre une pièce. Elle-même a eu une longue carrière de physicienne, sans jamais délaisser sa passion : le théâtre. Résultat : cette scientifique renommée dirige depuis dix ans la Reine Blanche, petit théâtre parisien composée d'une "annexe" à Avignon. Ce n'est pas tout : elle joue et écrit, avec l'objectif de valoriser et de sensibiliser aux sciences par la scène. Son spectacle sur Rosalind Franklin s'inscrit dans un triptyque intitulé "Les Fabuleuse", qui rend également justice à deux autres femmes scientifiques évincées de l'histoire. 28 Minutes est le magazine d'actualité d'ARTE, présenté par Elisabeth Quin du lundi au jeudi à 20h05. Renaud Dély est aux commandes de l'émission le vendredi et le samedi. Ce podcast est coproduit par KM et ARTE Radio. Enregistrement : 28 mai 2024 - Présentation : Élisabeth Quin - Production : KM, ARTE Radio
L'émission 28 Minutes du 28/05/2024 La physicienne Élisabeth Bouchaud réhabilite sur scène les oubliées de la science "Les filles d'aujourd'hui qui veulent faire des sciences n'ont aucun modèle [...] il est important de montrer en quoi ces [femmes] scientifiques sont géniales et de s'interroger sur les mécanismes qui les ont conduites aux oubliettes de l'histoire". Au début des années 1950, Rosalind Franklin, alors jeune biologiste et physicienne, est la première à déceler la structure en double hélice de l'ADN. De son incroyable découverte, elle ne tirera aucune gloire : son travail lui est volé par trois de ses homologues masculins. Pour réparer cette injustice, Élisabeth Bouchaud lui consacre une pièce. Elle-même a eu une longue carrière de physicienne, sans jamais délaisser sa passion : le théâtre. Résultat : cette scientifique renommée dirige depuis dix ans la Reine Blanche, petit théâtre parisien composée d'une "annexe" à Avignon. Ce n'est pas tout : elle joue et écrit, avec l'objectif de valoriser et de sensibiliser aux sciences par la scène. Son spectacle sur Rosalind Franklin s'inscrit dans un triptyque intitulé "Les Fabuleuse", qui rend également justice à deux autres femmes scientifiques évincées de l'histoire. Guerre en Ukraine : faut-il laisser les armes occidentales frapper la Russie ? "Le moment est venu pour les alliés d'évaluer la possibilité d'éliminer certaines restrictions sur l'utilisation des armes qu'ils ont fournies à l'Ukraine" a déclaré Jens Stoltenberg, le secrétaire général de l'OTAN, dans une interview publiée samedi par l'hebdomadaire “The Economist”. Cela pourrait remettre en cause une des lignes rouges que se sont imposées les Occidentaux depuis le début de l'offensive russe contre l'Ukraine ; celle de la non-utilisation de leurs armes en Russie — les Ukrainiens peuvent seulement utiliser les armes occidentales sur leur propre sol. Cette interdiction se veut le garde-fou d'un risque d'escalade avec Moscou. Néanmoins, depuis des mois, la Russie multiplie les offensives. L'Ukraine, elle, voit l'envahisseur se masser à sa frontière, sans pouvoir répliquer avec vigueur. Volodymyr Zelensky demande donc la levée de cette interdiction. L'idée divise le camp occidental : Antony Blinken, secrétaire d'État des États-Unis, a laissé entendre que c'était à l'Ukraine de décider de la manière de mener sa guerre ; plus frontalement David Cameron, chef de la diplomatie britannique, s'est dit prêt à autoriser les frappes sur le sol russe avec des armes livrées par Londres ; L'Italienne Giorgia Meloni, elle, s'insurge contre une telle idée. Faut-il autoriser l'utilisation d'armes occidentales en Russie ? Cela risque-t-il d'aggraver et d'élargir le conflit ? La réalité du terrain nous oblige-t-elle à revoir nos principes ? On en débat. Enfin, retrouvez également les chroniques de Xavier Mauduit et Marie Bonnisseau ! 28 Minutes est le magazine d'actualité d'ARTE, présenté par Elisabeth Quin du lundi au jeudi à 20h05. Renaud Dély est aux commandes de l'émission le vendredi et le samedi. Ce podcast est coproduit par KM et ARTE Radio. Enregistrement : 28 mai 2024 - Présentation : Élisabeth Quin - Production : KM, ARTE Radio
The European Space Agency's Mars rover mission, Rosalind Franklin, is back on track for a 2028 launch, thanks to a groundbreaking nuclear-powered heating system and a crucial partnership with NASA. After severing ties with Russia, ESA is forging ahead with innovative technology and renewed international collaboration.
Rosalind Franklin leistete die entscheidende Arbeit für die Entschlüsselung der DNA-Struktur – warum drei Männer dafür den Medizinnobelpreis erhalten und nicht sie, erzählt Andrea Sawatzki in dieser Folge.
En este episodio entrevistamos a Teresa Arnalis, la mente detrás del perfil digital de LadyScience, para explorar el mundo de la divulgación científica y las curiosidades del cuerpo humano. Teresa nos comparte su experiencia como científica y su compromiso para acercar la ciencia al público a través de medios digitales y eventos presenciales. Discutimos cómo ha evolucionado la divulgación científica online en los últimos años, destacando el papel fundamental de las redes sociales y los podcasts para llegar a audiencias globales de manera exponencial.Además, exploramos algunas curiosidades de las mujeres en la ciencia que son realmente sorprendentes, como el caso de Rosalind Franklin o Marie Curie, ofreciendo una visión inspiradora de cómo la ciencia y la divulgación científica pueden unirnos y enriquecer nuestras vidas de maneras inesperadas.También abordamos los desafíos que enfrenta la divulgación científica en la actualidad, incluida la lucha contra la desinformación en línea y la promoción de la alfabetización científica. Destaca la importancia de hacer que la ciencia sea inclusiva y accesible para todos, independientemente de su género, origen étnico o situación socioeconómica. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Pour cette semaine du 9 avril : des expériences mystérieuses, une mission spatiale qui renaît de ses cendres, bien dormir pour garder la santé, un liquide révolutionnaire et les secrets enfouis de Narbonne. Bonne écoute et bon week-end !
GOOD EVENING: The show begins in Ukraine and th pause while Russia builds up for the big push to Ukraine and beyond. Then to Gaza and the pause while Hamas , I am told, reinforces through tunnels into Sina. To Beijing and qstions for Tim Cook and other executives at risk with a China disorder. To Budapest Hungary where Victor Orban is under scrutiny. To Boca Chica for Musk plans to put 200 tons to low Earth Orbit. To the ESA for dreams of a Mars rover Franklin. To Quito, Brasilia, Buenos Aires, Guatemala City. To Albi in France, to Milano and Moscow. To Seoul and Buenos Aires. 1927 Italia Claude comments: 1. Ukraine: The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been ongoing, with concerns about a potential escalation. Russia's military buildup along the Ukrainian border has raised tensions and fears of a larger-scale invasion. 2. Gaza: The situation in Gaza remains complex, with the militant group Hamas allegedly reinforcing its presence through tunnels into the Sinai Peninsula. This could potentially lead to further conflict with Israel. 3. Beijing: Apple CEO Tim Cook and other executives are facing challenges in China due to geopolitical tensions and potential regulatory issues. China's economic and political landscape is creating uncertainty for foreign companies operating there. 4. Budapest: Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has faced criticism from the European Union and others for his government's policies, which some view as undermining democratic institutions and the rule of law. 5. Boca Chica: Elon Musk's SpaceX is working on ambitious plans to send large payloads to low Earth orbit from its Starbase facility in Boca Chica, Texas. This could have significant implications for space exploration and satellite deployment. 6. ESA's Mars Rover: The European Space Agency (ESA) is planning a Mars rover mission named after Rosalind Franklin, a pioneering scientist. This mission aims to search for signs of past life on Mars and advance our understanding of the planet's geology and habitability. 7. Various cities: You mentioned several cities across Latin America (Quito, Brasilia, Buenos Aires, Guatemala City), Europe (Albi in France, Milan, Moscow), and Asia (Seoul). Each of these places likely has its own set of political, economic, and social developments that are worth monitoring. These events and developments highlight the complex and interconnected nature of global affairs, with significant implications for geopolitics, technology, space exploration, and regional stability. It's important to stay informed about these issues and consider their potential impacts on the world stage.
Siege der Medizin geht endlich weiter! Schauspielerin Andrea Sawatzki macht sich auf Zeitreise in die Medizingeschichte. In der neuen Staffel stehen nicht nur die größten Siege der Medizin-Forschung, sondern insbesondere die Menschen dahinter im Fokus. Seid dabei, wenn wir mit James Lind um die Welt segeln, mit Henrietta Lacks ins All fliegen oder uns mit Rosalind Franklin tief übers Mikroskop beugen.
Emma and Will talk about the final two Pandora's Blocks puzzles, "Form One Line, Please" and "Stepping Down." Spoilers for both of those puzzles!Pandora's Blocks may be ending, but Outside the Blocks will continue! More podcast episodes on more fun puzzles coming your way soon.And yes, Will did find that lost collar stay.Links of interest:"Form One Line, Please": https://crosshare.org/crosswords/7bpbFT8eqvlCuAQ4SHHd/form-one-line-pleaseRosalind Franklin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Franklin"Stepping Down": https://crosshare.org/crosswords/FEP77dhkepVr6fWWLg0W/stepping-down-------------------------------------------Want to get in touch with us? We would love to hear from you! You can reach Emma at damefoxwords@gmail.com, and you can reach Will at pandorasblockswmc@gmail.com. We may read your letter on a future episode! Podcast hosting by Buzzsprout Music by FASSounds from Pixabay
Dr. Janet Laidla shares her work on charting the roles and contributions of women at the University of Tartu from the early days of the Estonian Republic, and what it means today. Baltic Ways is a podcast brought to you by the Association for the Advancement of Baltic Studies, produced in partnership with the Baltic Initiative at the Foreign Policy Research Institute. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of AABS or FPRI.Read more: * Estonia's first female doctorates were educators and physicians | News | ERR * Eesti esimestest naisdoktoritest said eeskätt arstid ja õpetajad | Ajalugu | ERR* Laidla, Janet; Anepaio, Lembi (2024). Esimesed doktorikraadiga naised tänapäeva Eesti aladelt [The First Female PhDs from the Present-day Estonian Area]. Õpetatud Eesti Seltsi aastaraamat / Annales Litterarum Societatis Esthonicae, 28−67. https://oes.ut.ee/publikatsioonid/TranscriptIndra Ekmanis: Welcome to Baltic Ways, a podcast bringing you interviews and insights from the world of Baltic studies. I'm your host, Dr. Indra Ekmanis. Today, we listen to a conversation with Dr. Janet Laidla, lecturer in Estonian history at the University of Tartu. Dr. Laidla's recent research has focused on the history of women at the university and the essential roles they have played in both academic and non academic work. Stay tuned.Thank you so much for joining us on Baltic Ways. Perhaps you can start with a bit about your background and how you came to be involved in Baltic studies.Janet Laidla: Thank you so much for inviting me. It's a bit of a long story. So bear with me, because I have a bit of an unconventional academic career path. It started out conventional enough. So I did my BA and MA in history at the University of Tartu in Estonia, and then right after went straight to PhD also in history, also at the University of Tartu.But in my fourth year of PhD, in early modern chronicles, I got a bit stuck. So instead of graduating, I went out to look for a job. And eventually I was hired by the University of Tartu Museum. And there I worked in different positions and for several years I was the head of the Old Observatory. I enjoyed that a lot.But instead of history I was promoting astronomy for 10 years, and my research was more concentrated on the history of science [rather] than the history of 17th century chronicles. I still had a small position at the Institute of History and Archaeology as lecturer, and although I always planned to defend my PhD eventually, I got around to it when the university changed the rules and said you now have to have a PhD to be a lecturer.But as I said, my focus had already changed, so after graduating I was moving slowly at first towards the 20th century. And, because I had been working on the early modern period, I now also had to seek out new networks. And I had been aware, through a lot of my colleagues, of the Association for the Advancement of Baltic Studies. But, well, a few years ago, I decided now it's time because I was working in similar topics that my colleagues who were members were now working on.IE: Maybe you can tell us a little bit about that transition from studying early modern historiography, and then you went into history of astronomy and sciences, and now your focus is on studying women in academia. Perhaps you can trace that path for us a little bit.JL: Well, the University Museum is not only about history of science, it was also about the history of university, and I had been interested in the history of university, especially women students for a while, specifically the period of the 1920s and the '30s, the interwar period.And for the university centenary in 2019, where we celebrated the hundred years of Estonian-language university, we were preparing an exhibition at the National Archives on academic women. And we were so surprised that there was so little research on that subject. So basically, this is how I ended up with the topic that I'm really passionate about. However, my first research paper I did in my first year of university was actually on the position of women in Greek society. So in a way I was going back to the roots.IE: A full circle sort of a journey then. Well, can you tell us a little bit about your current work, looking at women, studying and working at the University of Tartu? You mentioned that you started looking at the interwar period. Maybe you can tell us a bit about the role of the university during those first years of the Estonian Republic and how it developed and how it came to admit women also into different fields of study.JL: The University of Tartu has a long and illustrious history going back, well, almost 400 years. So it already played a role in the national awakening in the 19th century of Estonian and also Latvian and many other nations of the Russian Empire. And of course it was important for the young republic. Its official name was the University of Tartu of the Republic of Estonia. So the state was literally in the name. Also, there was the political decision, to change the language of instruction to Estonian that we celebrated. So Estonian at the time was not a language of scholarly use. The secondary education had mostly been in German or Russian.And so the university was tasked, alongside other organizations, to create the vocabulary needed for research. And the university also concentrated on Estonian culture, Estonian history, literature, but also Estonian geography and nature, natural resources, instead of the whole Russian Empire, or the world.It was not as provincial as it sounds, of course, there were still world renowned scholars like Ernst and Armin Öpik, Ludvig Puusepp, Johann Villip, Walter Andersson, and others. But when we talk about women — women had been admitted as auditors since 1905 and full students since 1915, which is much later than in the US or the UK, for example.But in the Russian empire, and also, in fact, Germany, the struggle for female higher education had been going on over the 19th century. Many women also from Estonia went to Switzerland and there were the higher courses in Tartu, but also in St. Petersburg and Moscow, and some of them are kind of like women's colleges. But this is like a topic that I plan to have a closer look at in the future.So the university in 1919 did not reverse the decision to admit women — it was already admitting women, it had been admitting women for, for some years already. And I think it would have been an unpopular decision if they had decided to no longer admit women, but I mean, not everybody was in favor as well. It was like not 100 percent that all the male academics were like, “Yes, let all those women come in.”IE: Maybe you can share a little bit about how the career paths of women in these academic positions at University of Tartu evolved over time — some of the trends that you saw.JL: So, even before you had some women working as assistants in the university clinics, or assistant assistants at the astronomical observatory, Maria Orlova, for example. But, in 1919, they started with a temporary lecturer of English. She was called Jenny Leidig, and she had been appointed already in 1905 [edit: 1906]. But then the state said, the government said, “No, no women in academia, in the staff positions, I mean, we don't even have them as students, so what were you thinking?”So in 1919, you had Jenny Leidig. You had some assistants in the clinics, and there was this young woman, Lidia Poska-Teiss, who also applied to become an assistant in — first she was working at the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, but then sort of moved into medicine. And, over the period of the 1920s and the '30s, you could say that the number of and the percentage of female staff grew steadily.By 1938, it was around 16 percent of the whole staff. That includes all of the clerical, the secretary positions and the libraries and so on. But we can say that perhaps around 13 percent of the staff were doing at least some research and teaching. And over time, some women rose from junior to senior assistants.The first woman to be invited to become a professor was in 1939. She was, however, not appointed, again by the state. For different reasons, gender had probably less to do with it. So Alma Tomingas basically became the first auxiliary professor in 1940. And she was a pharmacologist.IE: In your work, you also speak a little bit about the challenges facing women in their career progression. And those challenges — one being dealing with gender and patriarchal society, but also other social and economic and political factors. Can you tell us a little bit about those and their impact on women at the University of Tartu?JL: Basically, it was as complicated as it is now, in a sense. A fair part of the society still saw women's place at home. Single women, and also men in Estonia, in the marriageable age were frowned upon.IE: In terms of coming into the university?JL: Well, sort of basically coming to university because either you were there to find a husband or you were there to sit in a cafe and, you know, waste your life.And also the fear that if you had a higher education, you would not marry because that myth stayed around for quite a bit of time. However, there were still many working mothers — also at the university. So economically, it made sense in many cases that both of the parents worked, except right after the Great Depression, where, especially in civil service, only one of the spouses was supposed to work.It could be the woman, but of course more often it was the man. So, and also the university — all this apparent progress aside, the steady rise of women and staff numbers — there is no question of the fact that the university and the state saw research as mainly as a male profession, because the graduate research scholarships that are listed in the staff lists were given almost exclusively to men.Vera Poska-Grünthal, she was a specialist in social law, is a notable exception. This of course, led women to search for alternative opportunities, for example, through the International Council [edit: Federation] of University Women. Hilda Taba, who worked in the US, is a very good example. But this also needs a little bit of a deeper investigation.A lot of women were working in temporary, low paying positions at the university. If you see that there's a job opportunity in, say, high school, or you can become a barrister, or open your own practice in medicine, work for a hospital, you figure that this will perhaps give me a higher salary. But definitely it might give you more financial security. The Baltic German women went to have careers in Germany. So there were a lot of issues at play here. So it was quite complicated. And of course there were stay at home moms and wives, it's just that I'm interested in professional women.IE: Of course. Can you speak a little bit more about these sorts of non-academic roles that women held and how they played into the overall culture at the university?JL: Yeah, interestingly, women had worked for the university long before they were admitted as students. From the first part of the 19th century, you had the midwives working for the university. From the second part, you had the housekeepers at clinics, you had the first secretaries. And the beginning of the 20th century, as I mentioned, the assistants at the Astronomical Observatory and the clinics. In the 1920s and '30s, there were also a lot of women working as secretaries in the offices, also at different libraries and with collections.And some of these women working especially in the collections might have also pursued research and they also could have done some teaching. I think the archaeologist Marta Schmiedehelm is a good example of this. So in my opinion, the line between academic and non-academic is blurred. And this is why I don't want to dismiss the non-academic positions from my research as many other scholars have done.IE: Yeah, absolutely. The work and the history of women at the university extending far beyond what we think of as formal academic roles. That's an important point to make. I wonder if you can tell us about the overall situation, and some of the key takeaways that you're finding in your research or areas perhaps that you want to continue to explore.JL: Well, some of the things that I have found from study of the University of Tartu during the interwar period, when I sort of engage them with the previous research on the subjects done in the US, the UK and Germany — then, in some places, the women were engaged in the so called feminine fields, such as home economics, for example. But in Tartu there were no clearly defined feminine fields because they did not have the home economics department for starts. But there are definitely non-female fields. So the faculties of theology, agriculture, and law were dominantly, if not exclusively, male fields. So women were more numerous in the faculties of medicine, veterinary medicine, mathematics and natural sciences.But it's sort of interesting because I think that the factor here is also the hierarchy, like how many levels of positions you have. For example, in humanities, you have lecturers, docents and professors. So in humanities, women only have the lower positions, at least until 1939. But in these other areas where you have the temporary assistants and junior assistants, senior assistant, docent, if you have more layers, then you actually can see women sort of starting from the bottom and going up.Of course, men also start from the bottom and go up and sometimes they linger in the lower positions and sometimes they are similarly demoted or leave the university. So I think that I need to do some more data analysis to really understand how the sort of the restructuring or the structure or the hierarchy of the position works for women at the time and perhaps how it works for women now.Also, the preliminary survey of the social status also suggests a more varied social background for the academic women in Estonia, in comparison to some other Western European countries. several are indeed from lower and upper middle class, but there are also a fair number of working class women and farmer's daughters.Now, farmer's daughters, there is a range, so they could be quite wealthy in Estonia, or relatively poor. So there's other factors as well. And, in many places, marriage ended the academic career. So academic women were single, but there's a significant number of married couples working at the university, such as Elfriede and Vilhelm Ridala, Elisa Käer-Kingisepp and Georg Kingisepp, Gerhard and Natalia Rägö, Salme and Ilmar Vooremaa, and so on. Many others were also married, just not to fellow academics, including Lidia Poska-Teiss, that I mentioned earlier. And of course there are fathers and daughters. So we get to mothers and daughters only in the 1940s.That said, there are several women students who remember being told that if they are serious about their research, they should not marry. One by Professor Gustav Suits, whose wife Aino worked at the university as a lecturer for over 15 years.IE: Oh, a bit ironic then!JL: Yeah, sort of, I know that this discussion took place before Aino took up the position of lecturer, so maybe he changed his mind when he, because Aino was also a mother, she was a working mother, they had children and so she had to somehow cope with everything. IE: It's interesting that you talk about this kind of range of economic backgrounds with the women who entered into these roles. Do you have any inclination as to why there is that type of access, that range?Janet Laidla: So I think it has something to do with Estonia, being the young republic, that sort of, sort of declared itself classless or where class wasn't as prominent. Also for many of these women, the secondary education, and also the university education was a way of social mobility. And they were out there to get a job, because the university education was costly, and they thought that it would be an easier way to work for the university while studying at the university. So they sometimes weren't motivated so much by the sort of idea of an academic career, they didn't see it as entering academia, as perhaps we sometimes do now that you have this career path ahead of you. It was just a job as any other. But this was a preliminary study and I would need to go further in order to make any kind of more profound arguments based on this. But it was interesting to see. But it was also expected, thinking about Estonian history, and what the Estonian state declared in the beginning it was about to do. I think that was one of the things that perhaps makes the Estonian state and probably some other similar case studies stand out on the background of the Western European situation.IE: I wonder what you think of all this work that you're doing — the study of the interwar period — how do you think it translates into today? How can it impact the way that we are thinking about women in academia now? I'm thinking a little bit about a study that I recently read about the United States, where there are fears of a “demographic crisis” regarding too many women in comparatively, in academia. The argument was that there's not necessarily a balance anymore. And I wonder what it's like in Estonia. And at the same time, keeping in the back of our mind that there are plenty of areas where we are not seeing parity or equity. So, curious about your thoughts on that.JL: Well, it's also a complex issue. Yes, I actually heard that argument recently. When we had the women in science days, one of the discussants was saying that soon we will be talking about the lack of men in university, so they will become a minority. Not yet in Estonia.Of course, things have changed where in 1940, we had one professor. And now we have around 30 percent of professors at the University of Tartu are women. So we're getting closer to balance. Thinking about recent research, Michelle Ryan wrote a paper in Nature in 2022 saying that one of the misconceptions we have is that we overestimate the progress.So perhaps, perhaps it was based on statistics, perhaps it was another overestimation of the representation of women. And I'm thinking perhaps partly we underestimate the number of women working at the university in the past. So we overestimate now because we think that there has been this huge progress.And then you might say, and that, yes, that's the numbers, but their positions and their contributions in comparison today were insignificant. But nowadays we understand research much more as teamwork, as a collaborative effort. So perhaps, the women of the past their contributions were not as insignificant. I mean, the records did not file themselves, the notes and manuscripts did not type themselves at the time. And we also know these later controversies concerning, for example, Rosalind Franklin or Jocelyn Bell Burnell. And I'm not saying that we'll find something like that here in Tartu as well, but still.Coming back to the overestimation or the fact that women are becoming dominant, that there's a fear that women might start to dominate academia some — well, it then tells you something about academia. Because the IT sector used to be a female area in the beginning, because the computers and it all started from the universities. It started from Harvard University where the computations and also the glass plates the astrographs were making were analyzed by a group of women, called the Pickering Harem. And also Tartu had its own sets of women computers and they were called computers.It's the whole “Hidden Figures” story at NASA and so on. So in the beginning, these sort of computer programs and computing, well, not in the beginning, but at some point this was women's work. And then it started to pay something. It started to be prominent. It started to be, you know, the salaries got higher. And then for some reason it became a dominantly male field. And now we're looking to include women in STEM, but also IT. So maybe we should do some soul searching and see if the working positions in academia are then not highly paid or prestigious enough that men are no longer interested.So it's not about women taking over. What I see when I look at professional women is that they are often stuck into low prestige, low paying jobs. So if, you know, if they're overflowing the academia, it says something about academia in the future. But well, at least in Tartu, we're a fair bit away from that.And it's also sort of about numbers. It's another thing that Michelle Ryan said that it's not the percentage of staff, you have to look at the positions. And I mean, are the sort of the heads of, you know, these Ivy League universities and colleges, the top positions, are they being taken over massively by women? Or is it just that you have women in administrative positions, the low paying the teaching positions. Is the overall percentage more than 50 or are you having women in the higher positions?IE: Yeah, absolutely. And you speak really well to that idea of those hierarchies and also the unrecognized labor that really does support broader academic achievement. Filing. Typing. Being a sounding board. It is important and significant to recognize that labor as well.Perhaps you can tell, tell us a little bit more about the future of your work.JL: The Tartu example is very interesting and also there is a lot of material because the University of Tartu collected masses of information on its staff and students — so, much more than many other institutions around the world, so you can do different things with the material. But I would also like to do some comparative history. For example, Zane Rosīte is doing similar studies, for her Ph.D. at the University of Latvia. I am looking to compare the Tartu case with Latvia because they are so close. But I'm also looking to compare my Tartu case with the universities in Finland, New Zealand, and Australia. And now you might be wondering why these countries.Well, the obvious factor, of course, is the early vote for women. But also the size of population, the number of universities, the empire factor is also there, and in a way, all four countries trying somehow to redefine themselves before the Second World War. Two of them becoming independent, and two of them sort of becoming definitely more autonomous within the empire. So I think it would be interesting to compare these. I don't think many people would agree Estonia and Finland as being a frontier in the 20th century, but somehow sort of these frontier, co-educational institutions in these four countries to see what else comes out from this comparison.IE: We will certainly look forward to seeing the results of that future work from you as well. You know, this has been such a fascinating discussion. And I think it's such an interesting and significant topic. It's really necessary to understand our histories, the histories of our institutions, the role of women throughout the course of those institutions, which has so often been undervalued or understudied at the very least. And this is making a significant contribution to that work. So I appreciate the discussion very much — especially in this time where we're seeing slow and incremental, but still important progress. I often think of the Baltics as one of those key regions that advances the visibility of women in leadership positions — thinking very much about those strong women Kaja Kallas, Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga, Dalia Gribauskaite — so it's interesting to have this perspective as well.Janet: Yes, because sort of we assume that the position of women, especially in the 20th century, has been linear, sort of progressive, but it hasn't actually. Also in academia, it hasn't. And there is a PhD thesis on the University of Washington in the US, for example, where she starts out in the 19th century and ends in, I think, 1970s. And she so shows how it has been up and down. It hasn't been this linear progress that I'm showing and, and here the fact that it's linear is really interesting.But of course in Estonia, there's a different kind of break in the 1940s. And this apparent understanding that in the Soviet Union, the gender question had been solved. And, I don't know if I'll really go into the Soviet period as well, but, well. It isn't as easy as that, definitely. So even if we are making progress at the moment, I think, especially in the US, you're feeling that when women's rights in general are in question. And then it's definitely sort of if you have reached some level, it's not, “Yes, we can also only go forward from here.” No, you can actually go back.I think it's something that needs to be kept in minds — every victory we have won is not certain.IE: It is certainly not a guarantee for that progress to be guaranteed. That's such an important point. Well, again, I am so thankful for the opportunity to be in discussion with you. Thank you so much, Dr. Laidla for joining us on the podcast. We certainly look forward to your future workJL: Thank you for having me. Thank you so much. IE:Thank you for tuning in to Baltic Ways, a podcast from the Association for the Advancement of Baltic Studies, produced in partnership with the Baltic Initiative at the Foreign Policy Research Institute. A note that the views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of AABS or FPRI.I'm your host, Indra Ekmanis. Subscribe to our newsletters at AABS dash Baltic studies dot org and FPRI dot org slash baltic dash initiative for more from the world of Baltic studies. Thanks for listening and see you next time. This transcript has been slightly edited for clarity. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fpribalticinitiative.substack.com
In honor of Women's History Month, Tanya Lee Stone, director of the Writing Program at Champlain College and author of several books about unsung heroes and missing histories for young readers, most recently, Remembering Rosalind Franklin: Rosalind Franklin and the Discovery of the Double Helix Structure of DNA (Christy Ottaviano Books, 2024) discusses her latest nonfiction picture book on a female pioneer in science and listeners call in to shout out the histories of other notable women in science.
As we enter Women's History Month, it's important to remember just how far we've come and still having so much more work to do. In that effort, it's important to know just how women have contributed to our advancement and many of these women you might recognize and many you may not because their work was stolen or taken credit for by someone else. These women show what's possible and I can't wait for you to listen to this one! Please share it with someone you think would enjoy it too! Time Stamps: (0:16) Women's History Month (2:06) Grateful Today with A Lot of Work Still To Do (4:51) Elizabeth Stanton and Ending Slavery (6:48) Marie Curie and Two Nobel Prizes (8:00) Ada Lovelace and Coding and Programming (9:45) Rosa Parks (10:25) Malala Yousafzai (12:25) Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan, and Mary Jackson (13:20) Ching Yi Zao The Pirate (14:15) Nettie Stevens on Sex Determination (15:15) Rosalind Franklin and The Double Helix DNA Structure --------------------- Stay Connected: Instagram: @alyciaisrael Facebook: Alycia Israel Apparel: Be Your Own Daddy
Podcast Episode 82 is on Rosalind Franklin a British chemist and X-ray crystallographer, whose work was central to understanding the structure of DNA.
HelixTalk - Rosalind Franklin University's College of Pharmacy Podcast
In this episode, we speak with Janeen Winnike, the Associate Dean for Student Affairs at Rosalind Franklin and a co-course director for the Pharmacy Law course at the university. We review some of the key points regarding federal and Illinois pharmacy law – a must-listen especially for graduates preparing for their MPJE exam after graduation! Key Concepts The FDA (via the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) primarily regulates manufacturers. Most regulation for pharmacies and pharmacists is via the federal Controlled Substances Act and state-based regulations (acts and administrative codes). An IND (investigational drug application) is required to begin human clinical trials (phase I-III). An NDA (new drug application) is used for the FDA to consider whether a drug should be approved for use in the US. The Federal Controlled Substances Act outlines which drugs are scheduled I-V. State law can be more restrictive. C-II drugs have special regulations related to prescribing, ordering/distribution, refills, partial fills, etc. In Illinois, pharmacists, student pharmacists, and pharmacy technicians are permitted to vaccinate patients aged 7 years and older (or temporarily 3 years and older per the PREP act for COVID-19 and influenza vaccines). Pharmacists can order and administer COVID-19 and influenza vaccines; other vaccines require a standing order or a prescription in order prior to administration in a pharmacy. References Illinois Pharmacy Practice Act (225 ILCS 85) https://ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1318&ChapterID=24 Illinois Pharmacy Practice Act Administrative Code (Part 1330): https://www.ilga.gov/commission/jcar/admincode/068/06801330sections.html Illinois Controlled Substances Act (720 ILCS 570) https://ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs5.asp?ActID=1941&ChapterID=53 Illinois Controlled Substances Act Administrative Code (Part 3100) https://www.ilga.gov/commission/jcar/admincode/077/07703100sections.html Pharmacist's Manual: An Informational Outline of the Controlled Substances Act. Drug Enforcement Administration. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/GDP/(DEA-DC-046R1)(EO-DEA154R1)_Pharmacist%27s_Manual_DEA.pdf
Episode 12 of the DNA Papers, is the first of a two-parter, which centers on papers published about the now iconic double helix structure of the DNA molecule. This episode features three publications, all published in the journal Nature, which represent the work of scientists working at King's College London, whose X-ray crystallographic work provided some of the crucial data that supported the new double helix model. Wilkins, Maurice Hugh Frederick, Alec R. Stokes, and Herbert R. Wilson. “Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: Molecular Structure of Deoxypentose Nucleic Acids.” Nature 171, no. 4356 (1953): 738–40. Franklin, Rosalind E., and Raymond G. Gosling. “Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate.” Nature 171, no. 4356 (1953): 740–41. Franklin, Rosalind E., and Raymond G. Gosling. “Evidence for 2-Chain Helix in Crystalline Structure of Sodium Deoxyribonucleate.” Nature 172 (1953): 156–57. Tune in to listen to our panel of experts in a lively and informative conversation about the place of these papers in the history of our understanding of DNA: Soraya de Chadarevian, University of California, Los Angeles Elspeth Garman, Oxford University Kersten Hall, University of Leeds Jan Witkowski, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory See also a collection of Resources at https://www.chstm.org/video/144 Closed captioning available on YouTube. Recorded on Nov. 6, 2023.
In this episode:00:54 Franklin's real roleWhen it comes to the structure of DNA, everyone thinks they know Rosalind Franklin's role in its discovery. The story goes that her crucial data was taken by James Watson without her knowledge, helping him and Francis Crick solve the structure. However, new evidence has revealed that this wasn't really the case. Rosalind Franklin was not a ‘wronged heroine', she was an equal contributor to the discovery.Nature Podcast: 25 April 2023Comment: What Rosalind Franklin truly contributed to the discovery of DNA's structure14:37 An automated way to monitor wildlife recoveryTo prevent the loss of wildlife, forest restoration is key, but monitoring how well biodiversity actually recovers is incredibly difficult. Now though, a team has collected recordings of animal sounds to determine the extent of the recovery. However, while using these sounds to identify species is an effective way to monitor, it's also labour intensive. To overcome this, they trained an AI to listen to the sounds, and found that although it was less able to identify species, its findings still correlated well with wildlife recovery, suggesting that it could be a cost-effective and automated way to monitor biodiversity.Nature Podcast: 25 October 2023Research article: Müller et al.27:11 Research HighlightsThe first brain recording from a freely swimming octopus, and how a Seinfeld episode helped scientists to distinguish the brain regions involved in understanding and appreciating humour.Research Highlight: How to measure the brain of an octopusResearch Highlight: One brain area helps you to enjoy a joke — but another helps you to get it30:24 Why multisensory experiences can make stronger memoriesIt's recognized that multisensory experiences can create strong memories and that later-on, a single sensory experience can trigger memories of the whole event, like a specific smell conjuring a visual memory. But the neural mechanisms behind this are not well understood. Now, a team has shown that rich sensory experiences can create direct neural circuit between the memory regions involved with different senses. This circuit increases memory strength in the flies, and helps explain how sense and memories are interlinked.Nature Podcast: 25 April 2023Research article: Okray et al.38:58 Briefing ChatHow elephant seals catch some shut-eye while diving.New York Times: Elephant Seals Take Power Naps During Deep Ocean Dives Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Max Pearson presents a collection of this week's Witness History episodes from the BBC World Service. Our guest is Professor Jenni Barclay from the University of East Anglia in the UK. She tells us about some of the most significant volcanic eruptions in history. We start with the eruption of Eyjafjallajokull in 2010, which caused air travel to stop across Europe. Then, memories of the Bolivian Water War in 2000. In the second half of the programme, we hear how the EpiPen was invented by Sheldon Kaplan. Plus, how Rosalind Franklin's research helped determine the structure of DNA. Finally, the discovery of the ancient city of Thonis-Heracleion, underwater off the coast of Egypt. Contributors: Sigrun Hreinsdottir - scientist who saw the eruption of Eyjafjallajokull. Jenni Barclay - professor of volcanology at the University of East Anglia, UK. Oscar Olivera - union official who led Bolivian Water War protests and negotiations. Michael Kaplan - son of Sheldon Kaplan, inventor of the EpiPen. Michael Mesa - colleague of Sheldon Kaplan. Jenifer Glyn - sister of scientist Rosalind Franklin, who helped discover the structure of DNA. Franck Goddio - underwater archaeologist who discovered Thonis-Heracleion. (Photo: Eyjafjallajokull erupting in 2010. Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson)
In 1951, Rosalind Franklin began one of the key scientific investigations of the century. The young British scientist produced an X-ray photograph that helped show the structure of DNA, the molecule that holds the genetic code that underpins all life. The discovery was integral to the transformation of modern medicine and has been described as one of the greatest scientific achievements ever. Farhana Haider spoke to Rosalind's younger sister, Jenifer Glynn, in 2017. (Photo: Dr Rosalind Franklin. Credit: Donaldson Collection/Michael Ochs Archives via Getty Images)
Liz Meitner, Rosalind Franklin, Madame Wu, Jocelyn Bell, son algunas de las físicas y químicas cuyo merito a su investigación fue otorgado a los hombres con los que compartían su trabajo. Hombres todos ellos que menospreciaron el trabajo de sus colegas científicas. Noelia Freire física y divulgadora científica: "Historias de traiciones"
In this episode of Dean's Chat, Dr. Jeffrey Jensen is joined by Dr. Don Curtis, a colleague from the Arizona College of Podiatric Medicine. They discuss Dr. Curtis' journey in podiatric medicine, starting from his undergraduate studies at the University of Utah to attending podiatric medical school at the Rosalind Franklin, William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine. Dr. Curtis completed his residency at the Carl T. Hayden VA in Phoenix, AZ. Dr. Curtis shares how he stumbled upon podiatry while working at a medical facility and was drawn to the relaxed and enjoyable work environment of podiatrists. Dr. Curtis has been a faculty member at AZCPM since 2012. Dr. Curtis directs courses in both the Podiatric Medicine and Podiatric Surgery curriculum, and practices in the Foot and Ankle Center at Midwestern University's Multispecialty Clinic. As of 2022, Dr. Curtis is also the Director of the Admissions Committee. Dr. Curtis was in private practice both in Utah and Arizona before joining AZCPM. Dr. Curtis is board-certified by the American Board of Foot and Ankle Surgery. This episode delves into the benefits of Dr. Curtis's approach in providing immediate pain relief to patients and making a tangible impact. Dr. Curtis emphasizes the gratification of being able to alleviate someone's pain on the spot, whether through injections, ingrown toenail treatments, bracing, or orthotics. Dr. Curtis highlights the ability to make an immediate difference as a standout aspect of their profession. He also highlights the importance of complementing procedures with appropriate antibiotics or injections, as well as providing patients with suitable orthotics or shoes. This hybrid approach allows them to address the immediate issue while also considering long-term solutions for the patients. Tune in to learn about the significance of the class on diabetic foot care and how it offers an opportunity to greatly impact patients' lives. Dr. Curtis believes this class is particularly crucial as it caters to the needs of individuals struggling with diabetic foot issues and peripheral vascular disease. He enjoys teaching this class and working with students to help them recognize the importance of podiatric care in this specific area. https://explorepodmed.org/ Dean's Chat Website Dean's Chat Episodes Dean's Chat Blog Why Podiatric Medicine? Become a Podiatric Physician
「谁生，谁死，谁来讲述你的故事？」，这是音乐剧《汉密尔顿》最后一幕的唱词。主演兼主创林 - 曼努尔・米兰达曾在采访中表示，每一个我们所自以为了解的历史人物，其实都取决于一个故事以及讲故事的人。然而现实是，许多故事被扭曲误解，更多故事甚至无人述说。无论如何，这构成了我们看待世界的方式。 在电影《奥本海默》上映之后，不少观众第一次注意到了参与曼哈顿计划的女性科学家们，尤其是在其中扮演了重要角色的华人女性科学家吴健雄。最近诺贝尔奖授予了三位女科学家，也让大众进一步了解了女性在学术领域上的探索与成就。不过我们发现，在女性叙事本就弱势的情况下，聪明而又坚定的女性知识分子更是受到了冷落。那么，我们为什么需要听到她们的故事？这些故事又是如何在历史中被讲述或者隐身的呢？ 嘉宾朱虹璇是「话剧九人」的创始人，也是话剧「春逝」—— 一个围绕吴健雄的生平展开的故事的创作者，这期节目我们就和她一起聊聊，那些被遗忘和被看见的女性故事。 本期人物 徐涛，声动活泼联合创始人 朱虹璇，「话剧九人」创始人，戏剧编剧、导演 主要话题 [01:42] 吴健雄：在《奥本海默》中被隐身的华人女性科学家 [12:13] 罗莎琳德·富兰克林：男性叙事和女性叙事下的她为何如此不同？ [20:15] 女性必须要以一种「情绪稳定」的方式获得应得的公正对待吗？ [35:25] 金斯伯格是如何决定起诉自己的学校的 [42:43] 女性，和她们被系上的「家庭」标签 延伸阅读 吴健雄 (https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%90%B4%E5%81%A5%E9%9B%84/37673) 罗莎琳德·富兰克林 (https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%BD%97%E8%8E%8E%E7%90%B3%E5%BE%B7%C2%B7%E5%AF%8C%E5%85%B0%E5%85%8B%E6%9E%97/1416756?fromtitle=%E7%BD%97%E8%8E%8E%E7%90%B3%C2%B7%E5%AF%8C%E5%85%B0%E5%85%8B%E6%9E%97&fromid=5673534) 顾静徽 (https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E9%A1%BE%E9%9D%99%E5%BE%BD/8723565) 《吴健雄――物理科学的第一夫人》 (https://book.douban.com/subject/1034096/?dt_dapp=1) 《异见时刻》 (https://book.douban.com/subject/30258976/?dt_dapp=1) 《Rosalind Franklin》 (https://book.douban.com/subject/3405603/?dt_dapp=1) 《The Secret of Life》 (https://book.douban.com/subject/35721241/?dt_dapp=1) 话剧《春逝》背后的民国女科学家们 (https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20211116A0ERMW00) 往期节目 #246 一万次喧嚣讨论和一万种尚未为性别平等而做的工作 (https://etw.fm/2040) #121 觉醒女性主义者的迷茫和纠结 (https://etw.fm/why-feminist-is-not-happy) #162 女性，独立女性和成为母亲 (https://etw.fm/162) Bonus: 这个世界对女性更友好了吗？ (https://etw.fm/women-equal-rights) 加入方式 支付 ¥365/年 (https://sourl.cn/rYXHK9) 成为声动胡同常住民。加入后，你将会在「声动胡同」里体验到专属内容、参与社群活动，和听友们一起「声动活泼」。 在此之前，也欢迎你成为声动胡同闲逛者 (https://sourl.cn/rYXHK9) ，免费体验会员内容、感受社群氛围。了解更多会员计划详情，我们在声动胡同等你。 (https://sourl.cn/seG52h) 幕后制作 监制：一凡、六工 后期：赛德 运营：瑞涵 设计：饭团 关于节目 Bigger Than Us，渴望多元视角，用发问来探索世界。 商务合作 声动活泼商务合作咨询 (https://sourl.cn/6vdmQT) 加入我们 声动活泼正在招聘「节目监制」和「声音设计师」，查看详细讯息请 点击链接 (https://sourl.cn/j8tk2g) 。如果你正准备在相关领域发挥专长、贡献能量，请联系我们。 关于声动活泼 「用声音碰撞世界」，声动活泼致力于为人们提供源源不断的思考养料。 我们还有这些播客：声动早咖啡 (https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/podcast/60de7c003dd577b40d5a40f3)、What's Next｜科技早知道 (https://guiguzaozhidao.fireside.fm/episodes)、吃喝玩乐了不起 (https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/podcast/644b94c494d78eb3f7ae8640)、反潮流俱乐部 (https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/podcast/5e284c37418a84a0462634a4)、泡腾 VC (https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/podcast/5f445cdb9504bbdb77f092e9)、商业WHY酱 (https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/podcast/61315abc73105e8f15080b8a)、跳进兔子洞 (https://therabbithole.fireside.fm/) 欢迎在 即刻 (https://okjk.co/Qd43ia)、微博等社交媒体上与我们互动，搜索 声动活泼 即可找到我们。 期待你给我们写邮件，邮箱地址是：ting@sheng.fm Special Guest: 朱虹璇.
On this weeks episode Ms. Scofield and Mr. Lane the STEM Guy come back after a two week hiatus and let us all know how the first quarter of the 2023-2024 school year ended. Miss Scofield talks about how much she is loving this group of 8th graders. She shares about a Rosalind Franklin project she did with her students. Mr. Lane talks about his journey with the ASU ASAP STEM Fellowship. You are not going to believe the latest turn on this journey. Tune in because it is a twist none of us were expecting.
Dean's Chat is providing bonus episodes interviewing students from the Schools and Colleges of Podiatric Medicine. This week we are joined by three students from the Rosalind Franklin - Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine (SCPM); Elizabeth Cook, Elena Romund, and Allyson Will. Allyson represents the class of 2026 and Elizabeth and Elena represent the class of 2025. All represent the American Podiatric Medical Students Association (APMSA) within the SCPM. Join our discussions each week on the podiatric journey our students are embarking on at the various schools. Students share their path to discovering podiatric medicine, to applying to what is now eleven schools and colleges of podiatric medicine. We do some professor shout-outs and discuss student services, extracurricular activities, and student life at each school. In this episode of Dean's Chat, the students share their educational experiences and offer insights for prospective students considering attending the Rosalind Franklin - Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric In this podcast episode, Dr. Jensen and the students highlight the importance of having resources and opportunities to interact with professionals in the field. They emphasize the incredible value of having access to such resources, particularly through attending meetings and conferences where they can directly engage with industry leaders and committees. These interactions provide them with the chance to express concerns, share experiences as students, and receive feedback from seasoned professionals. Dr. Jensen and the students also discuss the significance of understanding the inner workings of companies and committees in their field. They believe that gaining knowledge about these aspects of their education is crucial as it provides a better understanding of the profession and prepares them for their future careers. They express gratitude for the exposure they gain through these interactions, as it helps them appreciate the extensive work that goes on behind the scenes in their field. Additionally, the episode emphasizes the importance of networking and building relationships with professionals and fellow students. The students highlight the fact that their classmates will eventually become their colleagues, making it beneficial to collaborate and support one another. They encourage students to reach out to those in higher classes for study guides and resources. The episode also mentions the mentorship programs and faculty mentors provided by their school, further enhancing their support system. Dean's Chat Website Dean's Chat Episodes Dean's Chat Blog Why Podiatric Medicine? Become a Podiatric Physician
If there's 3.2 billion base pairs in the human DNA, how come there's only about 20,000 genes? What is a gene? What is the double helix? Why is it significant? Who deserves credit for the discovery of DNA? Why do some people think Rosalind Franklin should have been awarded a Nobel Prize? ... we explain like I'm five Thank you to the r/explainlikeimfive community and in particular the following users whose questions and comments formed the basis of this discussion: 1994x, coolbeans1114, xandarg and nickcagefan2 To the ELI5 community that has supported us so far, thanks for all your feedback and comments. Join us on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/eli5ThePodcast/ or send us an e-mail: ELI5ThePodcast@gmail.com
En el episodio de hoy te traemos algo súper interesante. Vamos a contarte sobre 5 mujeres que hicieron grandes descubrimientos los cuales impactaron el mundo y abrieron el camino para descubrimientos futuros. Hablaremos de Marie Curie, Ada Lovelace, Rosalind Franklin, Hedy Lamarr y Katherine Johnson. 5 de las muchas mujeres que dejaron huella en la historia. Medical Spanish Crash Course - Regístrate aquí: https://commongroundinternational.com/medical-spanish/healthcare-spanish-masterclass/ref/11314 PARTE 1 sobre 5 grande inventos - Episodio 340 - aquí: https://www.espanolistos.com/5-inventos/ Episodio 253 sobre Marie Curie: https://www.espanolistos.com/marie-curie/ Episodio 226 sobre 5 mujeres influyentes de la historia: https://www.espanolistos.com/mujeres-importantes/ ¡Dinos qué fue algo interesante que aprendiste en este episodio! Descarga la transcripción de este episodio aquí: https://www.espanolistos.com/ ¿Quieres tomar clases con nuestras tutoras colombianas? Registrate aquí: https://spanishlandschool.com/classes/ Ellas son divertidas, pacientes y preparan las clases de acuerdo a tus necesidades.
Kat Arney chats with Professor Matthew Cobb about what really happened between James Watson, Francis Crick and Rosalind Franklin during the discovery of the double helix structure of DNA.Full show notes, transcript and references online at GeneticsUnzipped.com Follow us on Twitter @GeneticsUnzipThis episode of Genetics Unzipped was written and presented by Kat Arney with audio production by Emma Werner and Sally Le Page.This podcast is produced by First Create the Media for the Genetics Society - one of the oldest learned societies dedicated to promoting research, training, teaching and public engagement in all areas of genetics.
The Berkshire Theatre Group production of "Photograph 51" is an intriguing portrait of British scientist Rosalind Franklin and her often overlooked role in the discovery of DNA's double helix structure.Director David Auburn said of the play, “Postwar England. In a small lab at Cambridge, the brilliant and iconoclastic scientist Rosalind Franklin plays a critical role in the discovery of the structure of DNA. But will her contribution be obscured by history and the scientific establishment? Anna Ziegler's play takes us on a riveting intellectual and emotional adventure, and I'm thrilled to be directing a cast led by BTG favorites Rebecca Brooksher and David Adkins."David Adkins, David Auburn, and Rebecca Brooksher join us.
James Watson and Francis Crick, who detailed the double-helix structure of DNA in 1953, are perhaps two of the most iconic scientists of the 20th Century. Yet the story of how they made their incredible discovery is perhaps equally famous, with a notorious narrative suggesting that they only identified the structure after taking the work of Rosalind Franklin and using it without her permission. Now, 70 years after the discovery of DNA's structure, it is perhaps time to rewrite the tale. New evidence has now been unearthed, in the form of an overlooked news article and an unpublished letter, that shows that Franklin was truly an equal contributor to the discovery, and Watson and Crick were not as malicious as previously assumed. Together with Matthew Cobb of the University of Manchester, Nathaniel Comfort from Johns Hopkins University, and Angela Creager of Princeton University, Gaia Vince discusses this tantalising tale and finds out more about how this discovery could bring a whole new twist to the story of DNA. Presenter: Gaia Vince Producer: Harrison Lewis Assistant Producer: Jonathan Blackwell
How do you like them apples? A researcher breeds climate-change tolerant fruit; New documents retell the story of Rosalind Franklin's contribution to DNA science; Desert birds have special belly feathers for carrying water for their chicks; Space mice give insight into how our microbiome could protect us from bone loss; UK science star Brian Cox's new book explores how we might live in a black hole.
In this episode:00:57 Franklin's real roleWhen it comes to the structure of DNA, everyone thinks they know Rosalind Franklin's role in its discovery. The story goes that her crucial data was taken by James Watson without her knowledge, helping him and Francis Crick solve the structure. However, new evidence has revealed that this wasn't really the case. Rosalind Franklin was not a ‘wronged heroine', she was an equal contributor to the discovery.Comment: What Rosalind Franklin truly contributed to the discovery of DNA's structure13:41 Research HighlightsHow the growth of tiny iodine-engined satellites could damage the ozone layer, and how a pill-like detector that could measure radiotherapy dosages.Research Highlight: How CubeSats could harm the ozone layerResearch Highlight: An easy-to-swallow pill monitors X-ray dosage16:06 Why multisensory experiences can make stronger memoriesIt's recognized that multisensory experiences can create strong memories and that later-on, a single sensory experience can trigger memories of the whole event, like a specific smell conjuring a visual memory. But the neural mechanisms behind this are not well understood. Now, a team has shown that rich sensory experiences can create a direct neural circuit between the memory regions of fruit fly brains. This circuit increases memory strength in the flies, and helps explain how sense and memories are interlinked.Research article: Okray et al.23:44 Briefing ChatWe discuss some highlights from the Nature Briefing. This time, how video calls could help parrots feel less isolated, and a new method for recycling wind turbine blades.The Guardian: Parrots taught to video call each other become less lonely, finds researchNature Video: How to recycle a wind turbine in a test tubeSubscribe to Nature Briefing, an unmissable daily round-up of science news, opinion and analysis free in your inbox every weekday. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Can you PICTURE DNA without Rosalind Franklin? We sure can't! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
