Podcasts about statutes

Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:17532056201798502,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-9437-3289"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");pt> Click On Picture To See Larger Picture British PM is now betraying the country, he is making huge concessions with the European Union, his days are numbered. China cuts the interest rate, the Fed is still in a holding pattern, see what is happening. D's lost the rich are getting the tax cut narrative. Investors are buying gold funds. The [DS]/fake news  is now trying to pivot away from Biden. The problem is they do not have the narrative and the people are now asking a lot of questions of who was really running the country. Kash Patel and Dan Bongino are putting a information to smoke the sleepers out. Scavino in the last couple of days has pushed the military is the only way, why? Think statute of limitations, under civil law most are 5 years, under military most are unlimited.   Economy Leftist British PM Keir Starmer BETRAYS Brexit, Causes Alarm by Signing Agreement With European Union Making HUGE Concessions   Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, has just betrayed Brexit – and may have dealt a death blow to the island's fishing industry. There's widespread alarm over the terms of the ‘reset' deal with the European Union and the huge concessions that he made. At a press conference alongside European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, Keir Starmer says he is ‘moving on' from ‘Brexit battles', and that this deal will put Britain ‘back on the world stage'. Daily Mail reported: https://twitter.com/NicholasLissack/status/1924372295377662009?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1924372295377662009%7Ctwgr%5E7c2d31a35626b522c5601d813473a16e3f834205%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fleftist-british-pm-keir-starmer-betrays-brexit-causes%2F (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:18510697282300316,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-8599-9832"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); https://twitter.com/darrengrimes_/status/1924436308941791427?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1924436308941791427%7Ctwgr%5E7c2d31a35626b522c5601d813473a16e3f834205%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fleftist-british-pm-keir-starmer-betrays-brexit-causes%2F  Source: thegatewaypundit.com China cuts key lending rates to record lows to counter the impact of US tariffs China's central bank has cut its key lending rates to record lows to bolster the economy and cushion the impact of escalating trade tensions with the United States. The move follows a sweeping stimulus package announced earlier this month. The People's Bank of China (PBOC) has lowered its benchmark lending rates for the first time in seven months as part of ongoing efforts to mitigate the impact of US tariffs on its economy. The central bank cut the 1-year and 5-year loan prime rates (LPR) by 10 basis points to 3.0% and 3.5%, Source:  euronews.com  US Federal Reserve officials signal rates likely to stay on hold until at least September The central bank's next three meetings are in June, July and September https://twitter.com/MarketsDotNews/status/1924709190376820961 https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1924818332550639622   https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1924816670285054349 Trump tax bill will expire on December 31, 2025. and taxes will go up No,

https://vimeo.com/1083016328?share=copy#t=0 https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/podcasts/2025/5/9/2025-05-12-taxpayer-fails-to-qualify-for-deduction-for-dod-ordered-move This week we look at: Deductibility of IVF and Gestational Surrogacy Costs Fraudulent Tax Claims & 28 U.S.C. § 2514 Tax Collection Suits & Statute of Limitations in United States v. Ragen Moving Expense Deduction - Civilian Department of Defense Contractor Eligibility Tax Court Jurisdiction - The 90-Day Deadline for Deficiency Petitions  

This week the gang kicks the pod off with Hollywood Nicky asking what's the best and worst things about dating you (0:22) followed by the pros and cons of dating young (6:55) and older (7:54). Retired NBA star Paul Pierce discusses his unconventional views on marriage (17:02). Shiloh Hendrix, a white woman in the media for calling a child the N-word raises more than half a million dollars (33:53). Things that one race can say that another race cant (41:28). Tragic story of Rodney Hilton Jr (44:47) and teens shot playing doorbell ditch (53:50). Workers at Frontier Airlines fired for heckling customer (58:32). If you won a large sum of money would you give your parents half if they asked?(1:02:04), mini Mike Fresh work rant (1:04:22). Statute of limitations in SA cases (1:05:32) and much more so tune in..........follow us on instagram @toxicmasuclinityissues_podcast@imhollywoodnicky@mike_fresh4hunnid@books_is_baehttps://linktr.ee/ToxicMasculinityIssues

As expected, the flood gates have now opened when it comes to allegations made against Diddy and in this epiosde, we take a look at what April Lampros says happened to her at the hands of Diddy.The NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act (GMVA), codified in N.Y.C. Administrative Code §§ 8-901 et seq., is a law enacted by New York City to address and provide legal remedies for gender-motivated violence. Here are some key points about the Act:Purpose: The GMVA aims to provide a civil remedy for individuals who are victims of gender-motivated violence. This type of violence is defined as a crime of violence committed because of gender or on the basis of gender.Definitions:Crime of Violence: The Act defines a "crime of violence" as any act or series of acts that would constitute a misdemeanor or felony under the penal law of New York State.Gender-Motivated: A crime is considered "gender-motivated" if it is committed, at least in part, because of the victim's gender or on the basis of gender.Civil Action:Victims of gender-motivated violence have the right to file a civil lawsuit against the perpetrator.The Act allows victims to seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney's fees and costs.Statute of Limitations:There is a seven-year statute of limitations for filing a civil action under the GMVA, which begins from the date of the last act of gender-motivated violence.Burden of Proof:In a civil action under the GMVA, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the violence was gender-motivated.Relation to Other Laws:The GMVA is intended to complement existing laws and does not preclude victims from seeking other legal remedies available under state or federal law.(commercial at 7:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:not_assigned_april_lampros_v_sean_combs_et_al_summons___complaint_1_1716553445.pdf (documentcloud.org)

As expected, the flood gates have now opened when it comes to allegations made against Diddy and in this epiosde, we take a look at what April Lampros says happened to her at the hands of Diddy.The NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act (GMVA), codified in N.Y.C. Administrative Code §§ 8-901 et seq., is a law enacted by New York City to address and provide legal remedies for gender-motivated violence. Here are some key points about the Act:Purpose: The GMVA aims to provide a civil remedy for individuals who are victims of gender-motivated violence. This type of violence is defined as a crime of violence committed because of gender or on the basis of gender.Definitions:Crime of Violence: The Act defines a "crime of violence" as any act or series of acts that would constitute a misdemeanor or felony under the penal law of New York State.Gender-Motivated: A crime is considered "gender-motivated" if it is committed, at least in part, because of the victim's gender or on the basis of gender.Civil Action:Victims of gender-motivated violence have the right to file a civil lawsuit against the perpetrator.The Act allows victims to seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney's fees and costs.Statute of Limitations:There is a seven-year statute of limitations for filing a civil action under the GMVA, which begins from the date of the last act of gender-motivated violence.Burden of Proof:In a civil action under the GMVA, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the violence was gender-motivated.Relation to Other Laws:The GMVA is intended to complement existing laws and does not preclude victims from seeking other legal remedies available under state or federal law.(commercial at 7:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:not_assigned_april_lampros_v_sean_combs_et_al_summons___complaint_1_1716553445.pdf (documentcloud.org)

As expected, the flood gates have now opened when it comes to allegations made against Diddy and in this epiosde, we take a look at what April Lampros says happened to her at the hands of Diddy.The NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act (GMVA), codified in N.Y.C. Administrative Code §§ 8-901 et seq., is a law enacted by New York City to address and provide legal remedies for gender-motivated violence. Here are some key points about the Act:Purpose: The GMVA aims to provide a civil remedy for individuals who are victims of gender-motivated violence. This type of violence is defined as a crime of violence committed because of gender or on the basis of gender.Definitions:Crime of Violence: The Act defines a "crime of violence" as any act or series of acts that would constitute a misdemeanor or felony under the penal law of New York State.Gender-Motivated: A crime is considered "gender-motivated" if it is committed, at least in part, because of the victim's gender or on the basis of gender.Civil Action:Victims of gender-motivated violence have the right to file a civil lawsuit against the perpetrator.The Act allows victims to seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney's fees and costs.Statute of Limitations:There is a seven-year statute of limitations for filing a civil action under the GMVA, which begins from the date of the last act of gender-motivated violence.Burden of Proof:In a civil action under the GMVA, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the violence was gender-motivated.Relation to Other Laws:The GMVA is intended to complement existing laws and does not preclude victims from seeking other legal remedies available under state or federal law.(commercial at 7:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:not_assigned_april_lampros_v_sean_combs_et_al_summons___complaint_1_1716553445.pdf (documentcloud.org)

This conversation delves into the fundamental aspects of contract formation, exploring the essential elements such as mutual assent, offer and acceptance, consideration, capacity, and legality. It also discusses various defenses that can affect the enforceability of contracts, providing a comprehensive overview for those preparing for law school exams or practicing in the field.TakeawaysContract formation is critical for law students and practitioners.Mutual assent is essential for a valid contract.An offer must be clear and definite to be valid.Consideration must involve a bargain for exchange.Capacity to contract is necessary for enforceability.Legality of the contract's purpose is crucial.Defenses like misrepresentation can void a contract.The UCC provides flexibility in contract formation.Common law and UCC differ in their approach to contracts.Understanding these elements is foundational for contract analysis.A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties that creates mutual obligations. It governs how these obligations are created, modified, enforced, and extinguished.The two principal sources are Common Law, governing service agreements and real estate, and Article Two of the U.C.C., governing contracts for the sale of goods.Mutual assent means the parties agree to the same thing in the same sense. The objective theory means this is determined by a party's outward expressions and conduct, not their secret intentions.A valid offer requires intent, reasonably definite terms, and communication to the offeree.An offer can be terminated by revocation, rejection, counteroffer, lapse of time, or death/incapacity of a party.The Mirror Image Rule states that an acceptance must exactly match the terms of the offer. If it introduces different or additional terms, it is a counteroffer.Yes, under U.C.C. § 2-207, an acceptance with additional or different terms can still form a contract unless it is expressly conditional on assent to the new terms.Consideration is the legal term for what each party gives or promises to give in exchange for the other party's promise; it is a bargained-for exchange of something of legal value.Past consideration and the preexisting duty rule are two doctrines that limit what qualifies as consideration.The Statute of Frauds requires certain contracts to be in writing to be enforceable. Examples include contracts for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more, contracts that cannot be performed within one year, or contracts for the sale of real estate.Sound Bites"Understanding them isn't just for exams.""The UCC is often more flexible.""Mutual assent is the meeting of the minds.""Consideration is the price of the promise.""Capacity is key in contract law."Chapters00:00 Understanding Contract Formation10:01 The Core Elements of a Contract20:05 Defenses Against Contract Enforcement

This lecture provides a foundational overview of contract formation, outlining the essential elements required for a legally binding agreement. It explains that a contract necessitates mutual assent, typically through offer and acceptance, along with consideration, representing the bargained-for exchange. The discussion also covers the importance of legal capacity and lawful purpose, while further detailing various defenses that can prevent contract enforcement, such as fraud, duress, and the Statute of Frauds. Ultimately, the lecture establishes the fundamental principles that determine whether a valid contract exists under both common law and the Uniform Commercial Code.

”Sing aloud to God our strength; shout for joy to the God of Jacob! Raise a song; sound the tambourine, the sweet lyre with the harp. Blow the trumpet at the new moon, at the full moon, on our feast day. For it is a statute for Israel, a rule of the God of Jacob.” Psalm 81:1-4

In this episode of No Broke Months, Dan Rochon breaks down the real estate basics every agent thinks they remember—but most have forgotten. From the importance of written contingencies to the powerful OLD CAR framework, Dan reveals how mastering the fundamentals protects your clients, builds trust, and boosts your referrals. This isn't fluff—this is real estate 101 that actually makes you money. Whether you're new or seasoned, it's time to revisit the foundational principles that separate the pros from the lawsuits.What you'll learn on this episodeWhy all contingencies must be in writing and what happens if they're not.The OLD CAR acronym that defines your fiduciary duty as an agent.The difference between a client and a customer and what you owe each.How over-communication is the secret weapon to a 5-star client experience.Why relying on memory from your real estate exam could cost you big time.Resources mentioned in this episodeOLD CAR Framework: A powerful acronym to explain fiduciary duties: Obedience, Loyalty, Disclosures, Confidentiality, Accounting, Reasonable Care/Due Diligence.Statute of Frauds: The legal rule requiring real estate contracts (except leases under one year) to be in writing and signed by the parties.CPI Time: Dan's methodology for high-leverage agent activities that drive income and results. To find out more about Dan Rochon and the CPI Community, you can check these links:Website: No Broke MonthsPodcast: No Broke Months for Salespeople PodcastInstagram: @donrochonxFacebook: Dan RochonLinkedIn: Dan Rochon

Thanks for joining us for another Listen to this BULL and don't forget to subscribe.#insurancetips  #publicadjusterpodcast LISTEN TO THIS BULL is available on your favorite streaming platform!:Apple Podcasts: shorturl.at/bkuP7Spotify: shorturl.at/bpEMUGoogle Podcasts: shorturl.at/yAJY5Amazon Music: shorturl.at/rxBX9Listen to this Bull Exposing Bull in the Insurance Industry https://listentothisbull.com/ Support the show

"I know my first name is Steven." These words were uttered by Steven Stayner, who was kidnapped in 1972 at the age of six by a pedophile. Eight years later, and still in the clutches of his captor, once 5-year-old Timmy White was kidnapped, Steven knew he couldn't let what happened over the prior eight years happen to Timmy. The boys escaped their captor and made their way to a police station, where Steven, who had been brainwashed and groomed by his captor, uttered those words to law enforcement.SOURCES:1) Heroism and Horror: One Brother Was Kidnapped, The Other Became A Serial Killer2) Two kidnapped boys, a hero's return, then a tragic twist: The unbelievable story of Steven Stayner3) Steven and Cary Stayner: The tale of two brothers' horror and heroism4) Steven Stayner's Kidnapping, Cary Stayner's Horrific Crimes and One Family's Unbelievable Story5) 'Captive Audience': Who Was Steven Stayner and What Happened To Him?6) Who Was Steven? : The Little Boy Who Had Been Kidnaped Never Found Himself7) He Was Abducted As A Child. Then His Brother Became A Serial Killer.8) Kidnapper Returns To Jail9) Molester Gets Life Term for Attempt to Buy a Boy10) A Child Abductee's journey back11) Steven Stayner Wikipedia Page12) The Little Boy Who Never Came Home13) Second Man Held in '72 Abduction of California Boy; Statute of Limitations14) Propensity Podcast: Episode 1: In the Shadow of Yosemite - Part 1: Steven Stayner15) Kenneth Parnell Wikipedia Page

On this episode, we delve into "the past". Do our past actions still define us? Am I wrong to judge people based on their past? More importantly, do people really outgrow their mistakes?It's the weekend. Lay back, throw your feet up, and enjoy the episode. You can leave comments/feedback wherever you're listening from or reach out via shakingtableswithaa@gmail.com

This episode features a full length Bible study taught by Pastor Jack Abeelen of Morningstar Christian Chapel in Whittier, California.If today you prayed with Pastor Jack to receive the Lord, we'd love to hear about it and get you started on the right foot. Visit us online at: https://morningstarcc.org/born-again/To see more of Pastor Jack's Bible studies, visit our Morningstar Christian Chapel channel at https://www.youtube.com/@morningstarcc.To subscribe to our Podcast newsletter go to http://eepurl.com/iGzsP6.If you would like to support our electronic ministry, you may do so by going to our donations page at https://morningstarcc.churchcenter.com/giving/to/podcast.Visit our church website at https://morningstarcc.org.

If you are under CNC status with the IRS, does your CSED stop or keep going? It's important to know this answer...Do you have tax debt? Call us at 866-8000-TAX or fill out the form at https://choicetaxrelief.com/If you want to see more…-YouTube:    / @loganallec  -Instagram: @ChoiceTaxRelief @LoganAllec -TikTok: @loganallec-Facebook: Choice Tax Relief // Logan Allec, CPA -Reddit: u/Logan_AllecMentioned Video Links:-Is There Such a Thing As an "Unable to Pay Taxes" Status?:    • Is There Such a Thing As an "Unable t...  -Will Finding Out Your IRS CSED Give the IRS More Time to Collect?:    • Will Finding Out Your IRS CSED Give t...  

The objective theory of contracts states that a party's intention to enter into a contract is judged by outward, objective manifestations (words and conduct) as interpreted by a reasonable person in the offeree's position, rather than the party's secret, subjective intentions. This differs from a purely subjective approach, which would focus on what the parties actually thought, potentially leading to uncertainty and difficulty in enforcement.The common law mirror image rule requires that the acceptance must precisely match the terms of the offer; any deviation constitutes a counteroffer. U.C.C. Section 2-207 modifies this for the sale of goods, particularly between merchants, by allowing a definite expression of acceptance to create a contract even with additional or different terms, unless those terms materially alter the agreement, the offer expressly limits acceptance to its terms, or the offeror objects.Valid consideration is a bargained-for exchange of legal value, where each party gives up something of legal value (a right, a promise, or an act) in exchange for something of legal value from the other party. For example, if Sarah agrees to sell her used car to John for $5,000, Sarah's promise to transfer the car and John's promise to pay the money both constitute valid consideration.Promissory estoppel, or detrimental reliance, allows a court to enforce a promise even without traditional consideration if the promisor makes a clear and unambiguous promise, the promisee reasonably and foreseeably relies on that promise to their detriment, and injustice can only be avoided by enforcing the promise. This might occur if an employer promises an employee a bonus upon retirement, and the employee retires in reliance on that promise.The typical categories of contracts falling under the Statute of Frauds include contracts for the sale of land, contracts that cannot be performed within one year, contracts in consideration of marriage, contracts to answer for the debt of another, and contracts for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more. These contracts are generally required to be in writing to prevent fraudulent claims and provide more reliable evidence of the agreement's terms given their significance or duration.Substantial performance occurs when a party has performed the essential purpose of the contract in good faith, but with minor deviations. The non-breaching party must still perform but may be entitled to damages for the minor defects. Material breach, on the other hand, is a significant failure to perform that defeats the essential purpose of the contract, allowing the non-breaching party to suspend their own performance and sue for damages.The primary goal of compensatory damages is to compensate the non-breaching party for the loss suffered as a direct result of the breach, aiming to put them in the same economic position they would have been in had the contract been fully performed. The two main types are direct damages (loss of the bargain) and consequential damages (foreseeable losses resulting from the breach). A limitation on consequential damages is that they must have been reasonably foreseeable to the breaching party at the time the contract was formed.Specific performance is an equitable remedy where a court orders the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations. It is typically granted only when monetary damages are inadequate to compensate the non-breaching party, such as in contracts for the sale of unique goods (e.g., rare artwork) or real estate, where each piece of property is considered unique.An intended beneficiary is a third party whom the contracting parties intended to benefit directly from the contract and has the right to enforce the contract against the promisor. An incidental beneficiary, on the other hand, is a third party who may indirectly benefit from the contract but was not the intended recipient of that benefit and does not have the right to enforce the contract.

Is the dire wolf really back? We look at the facts of its alleged return. And on This Day in History, the Statute of Anne is enacted. We'll tell you what it was, and its impact on modern copyright law. ‘Return' of the dire wolf is an impressive feat of genetic engineering, not a reversal of extinction | The Conversation Colossal's de-extincted 'dire wolf' isn't a dire wolf and it has not been de-extincted, experts say | Live Science The Dire Wolf Isn't Back—But Here's What ‘De-Extinction' Tech Can Actually Do | Scientific American Is the dire wolf back from the dead? Not exactly | Science.org [ON THIS DAY] The Birth of Copyright: Statute of Anne The Statute of Anne: The First Copyright Statute Copyright History Contact the show using email address coolstuffcommute@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The foundations of modern copyright law were laid on 10th April 1710, when the Statute of Anne came into effect. Before the Act, anyone could copy and sell books without giving a penny to the author; now, writers would be protected from being completely exploited by (British) publishers for an initial period of 14 years. Writers like Jonathan Swift and Daniel Defoe had earned respect as professionals, pushing for more control over their own work, and leading to a shift away from the Stationers' Company—a powerful guild that previously held a monopoly over publishing and censorship. In this episode, Arion, Rebecca and Olly explore how later writers like William Wordsworth would campaign for longer copyright duration; revisit the milestones that allowed the law to be applied to other creative endeavours, such as music and film; and reveal why you won't be hearing Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech in many adverts for a few years yet… Further Reading: • ‘The Statute of Anne' (British Parliament, 1710): https://ipmall.law.unh.edu/sites/default/files/hosted_resources/lipa/copyrights/Statute%20of%20Anne%20_1710_.pdf • ‘Whose line is it anyway?' (The Sunday Times, 2012):  https://www.thetimes.com/article/7c5efe43-97d5-4d9f-b53f-5444bca12a2a • ‘IP BASICS: What is Intellectual Property?' (Intellectual Property Office UK, 2015): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYiXTKbdNr4 #Publishing #1700s #UK #Legal Love the show? Support us!  Join 

Are you holding out hope for your tax debt expiring? How realistic is this? Find out now! Do you have tax debt? Call us at 866-8000-TAX or fill out the form at https://choicetaxrelief.com/If you want to see more…-YouTube:    / @loganallec  -Instagram: @ChoiceTaxRelief @LoganAllec -TikTok: @loganallec-Facebook: Choice Tax Relief // Logan Allec, CPA -Reddit: u/Logan_Allec

Jess is going viral on TikTok and has never felt more seen... Kramer may have gotten away with cheating with no consequences...

After a break last week, today we'll be talking about a disease with no known cause and surrounded by a lot of mysteries.

The Forefront Radio – Welcome to The Forefront Radio, your go-to source for biblical truth, history, and spiritual awakening. In a world filled with confusion, we bring clarity by diving deep into the Scriptures to reveal the importance of keeping the Most High's commandments.From the Sabbath to the dietary laws and holy convocations, we uncover how obedience to God's laws brings wisdom, protection, and blessings. In this season, we highlight the Passover celebration, a sacred memorial of deliverance and redemption. Learn why this feast remains vital today, not just as an ancient tradition, but as a prophetic symbol of freedom from sin and oppression.Join us as we explore the significance of righteous living, biblical prophecy, and cultural empowerment—because walking in truth is the key to true liberation.Tune in to The Forefront Radio and reclaim your heritage, faith, and purpose.

What happens to your tax debt during a state of emergency? Find out now! Do you have tax debt? Call us at 866-8000-TAX or fill out the form at https://choicetaxrelief.com/If you want to see more…-YouTube:    / @loganallec  -Instagram: @ChoiceTaxRelief @LoganAllec -TikTok: @loganallec-Facebook: Choice Tax Relief // Logan Allec, CPA -Reddit: u/Logan_Allec

Be sure to visit cultureproof.net Please consider supporting the Culture Proof Podcast. We aim to bring engaging content that will challenge and equip Christians to live according to the Straight Edge of Scripture. All gifts are tax deductible. Our Address is: S.E. Ministries PO Box 1269 Saltillo MS, 38866   Episode sponsors: BJUPress Homeschool We Heart Nutrition – Use the code CULTUREPROOF for 20% off Accountable2You – Try free for 10 days Forever-Written  Culture Proof Listeners  THANKS!   Culture Proof Podcast Theme song "Believers" courtesy of Path of Revelation    

In this episode, Jordan discusses a Second Circuit Court of Appeals opinion on statute of limitations, and a Central District of California decision on trade secret identification, and specifically the importance of distinguishing alleged trade secret information from public information included in patents.

Gaela and Cesca are identical twins. Gaela wants to pull some classic twin-switch pranks but Cesca thinks these types of pranks are hack! What does Judge John Hodgman think? With identical twin Expert Witnesses Jason Sklar and Randy Sklar! Who's right? Who's wrong?We are on TikTok and YouTube! Follow us on both @judgejohnhodgmanpod! Follow us on Instagram @judgejohnhodgman!Thanks to reddit user u/mkbecker for naming this week's case! To suggest a title for a future episode, keep an eye on the Maximum Fun subreddit at reddit.com/r/maximumfun! MaxFunDrive ends on March 28, 2025! Support our show now and get access to bonus content by becoming a member at maximumfun.org/join.

This panel will explore the Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright as well as its major questions cases. What impact will overturning Chevron deference have on the major questions doctrine? How do the two doctrinal developments relate? How do they connect to the non-delegation doctrine? These and related questions will be examined.Featuring:Prof. Eric Bolinder, Assisant Professor of Law, Liberty University School of LawProf. Tara Leigh Grove, Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law, University of Texas at Austin School of LawProf. Brian Slocum, Stearns Weaver Miller Professor, Florida State University College of LawModerator: Prof. Ilan Wurman, Julius E. Davis Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School

Are the products you use every day poisoning you? In this episode of Super Life, Darin Olien dives into phthalates, a class of toxic chemicals found in food packaging, personal care products, medical devices, and even children's toys. Despite mounting evidence linking phthalates to hormone disruption, infertility, obesity, and chronic illness, these chemicals remain largely unregulated in the United States. Darin breaks down why phthalates are everywhere, how they impact your body, and what you can do to protect yourself. He also highlights Minnesota's groundbreaking SF 188 bill, which aims to force food manufacturers to test and disclose phthalate contamination for the first time in U.S. history. If you care about your health, your family, and the toxic load in your daily life, this is a must-listen episode that will make you rethink what you're consuming. Government Responsibility in the Spread of Phthalates Phthalates are chemicals used to make plastics more flexible and durable. Since the mid-20th century, they've been incorporated into countless consumer goods, from food packaging to personal care products. This widespread use is largely due to regulatory inaction and the prioritization of industrial interests over public health. In the United States, agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have been slow to regulate phthalates, despite mounting evidence linking them to serious health issues. These include endocrine disruption, reproductive harm, and chronic illnesses such as obesity and diabetes. Unlike Europe, which has banned certain phthalates in food packaging and children's products, the U.S. has often allowed industry self-regulation, leading to widespread contamination in consumer goods. The Industrial Agricultural Revolution and Processed Foods The post-World War II industrialization of food production significantly increased the use of phthalates. As food manufacturing scaled up, plastics became integral in packaging and processing equipment, leading to phthalate leaching into our food supply. Highly processed foods are particularly susceptible due to multiple points of plastic contact during production and storage. Studies have shown that individuals consuming more processed and fast foods have higher levels of phthalates in their bodies. Minnesota's Legislative Action: A Step Forward In January 2025, Minnesota State Senator Heather Gustafson introduced Senate File 188 (SF 188), a bill requiring food manufacturers to test their products for phthalates and publicly disclose the results. If passed, this legislation would be the first of its kind in the U.S., aiming to increase transparency and encourage manufacturers to reduce phthalate levels in their products. According to Senator Gustafson, "Minnesotans have the right to know whether the food they are eating and serving their families is contaminated with toxic phthalates. My bill will help consumers make healthier buying decisions and create a strong incentive for food manufacturers to get plastic chemicals out of our food."  advocacy.consumerreports.org Why This Matters This bill is crucial because it: Increases Transparency: For the first time, food companies would be required to test for and disclose phthalate levels, creating public awareness of the contamination problem. Encourages Stricter Regulations: Public disclosure could lead to consumer pressure for stronger nationwide bans and restrictions. Prioritizes Public Health: It challenges the longstanding prioritization of industry preferences over public health, acknowledging that chemical exposure is a public health crisis. Addresses Chronic Illness: With rising rates of metabolic disorders and hormone-related diseases linked to endocrine-disrupting chemicals like phthalates, holding manufacturers accountable is a step toward reversing this trend. Products Commonly Containing Phthalates and Associated Health Risks Phthalates are pervasive in many consumer products. Here's a breakdown of common sources and the potential health implications: Personal Care Products: Items such as nail polishes, hair sprays, aftershave lotions, cleansers, and shampoos often contain phthalates.  fda.gov Food Packaging and Processed Foods: Phthalates can leach into food from packaging materials and during processing. Diets high in dairy and meat have been associated with higher levels of phthalate exposure.  webmd.com Medical Devices: Some medical devices, including intravenous bags and tubing, contain phthalates to increase flexibility.  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Household Items: Products like vinyl flooring, shower curtains, and certain furniture may contain phthalates.  toxicfreefuture.org Children's Toys: Some toys, especially those made from flexible plastics, can contain phthalates.  toxicfreefuture.org   Health Risks Associated with Phthalate Exposure Phthalates are known endocrine disruptors, meaning they can interfere with the body's hormonal systems. Potential health effects include: Reproductive Issues: Exposure has been linked to reproductive problems, including reduced fertility.  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Developmental Problems: Prenatal exposure may lead to developmental issues in children.  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Respiratory Issues: There is evidence suggesting a link between phthalate exposure and respiratory problems, such as asthma.  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Metabolic Effects: Some studies have associated phthalate exposure with metabolic disorders, including insulin resistance and obesity.  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov   Steps to Reduce Phthalate Exposure To minimize exposure to phthalates: Choose Phthalate-Free Products: Opt for personal care items labeled as phthalate-free. Limit Processed Food Intake: Reducing consumption of processed foods can decrease phthalate exposure. Use Alternatives to Plastic: Whenever possible, choose glass, stainless steel, or other non-plastic materials for food storage and household items. Stay Informed: Regularly check resources like the Environmental Working Group's Skin Deep database to find products free from harmful chemicals. How You Can Take Action While Minnesota is leading the way, collective action is essential to drive nationwide change. Here are steps you can take: Support the Bill: If you're in Minnesota, contact your state legislators to express support for SF 188. You can find more information and track the bill's progress here. Sign Petitions: Look for petitions advocating for the reduction of phthalates in consumer products and add your voice. Stay Informed: Follow organizations like Consumer Reports and Clean Water Action, which are actively involved in this issue. Reduce Personal Exposure: Limit consumption of highly processed foods, use glass or stainless steel for food storage, and avoid products with "fragrance" listed as an ingredient, as it can be a source of phthalates. Active Petition to Support Minnesota's SF 188 As of now, there isn't a specific petition available for Minnesota's SF 188 bill. However, you can take proactive steps to support this legislation: Contact Legislators: Reach out to Minnesota state legislators to express your support for SF 188. Personalized messages can be impactful. Stay Informed: Monitor the bill's progress through the Minnesota Revisor's Office website. Conclusion Minnesota's initiative is a significant step toward addressing the pervasive issue of phthalate contamination. However, true accountability requires federal-level bans, a shift toward non-toxic alternatives, and a rethinking of industrial food production. By staying informed and taking action, we can collectively push for a healthier future.   Bibliography Consumer Reports. "Minnesota Senator Gustafson introduces bill to protect consumers from toxic plastic chemicals in food." January 21, 2025.  advocacy.consumerreports.org Food Safety Magazine. "Bill Introduced in Minnesota to Require Phthalate Testing for Packaged Foods." January 21, 2025.  food-safety.com Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. "SF 188 as introduced - 94th Legislature (2025)."  revisor.mn.gov Food & Wine. "Minnesota Just Became the First State to Target Plastic Chemicals in Food." January 22, 2025.  foodandwine.com Thank you for joining us on "SuperLife with Darin Olien." Let's continue to strive for a healthier, more informed world.   Research Summaries: "Phthalates and Their Impacts on Human Health" Authors: Ying Wang, Hongjun Zhu, and Yanan Kannan Summary: This study discusses the widespread use of phthalates as endocrine disruptors and their detrimental effects on human health. It highlights that phthalates are present in numerous products that come into contact with plastics during production, packaging, or delivery.  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov "Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence of Their Impact on Human Health" Authors: Giuseppe Latini, Valentina Del Vecchio, and Andrea Massaro Summary: This review examines the presence of phthalates in various foods and their potential health impacts, including their role in increasing the risk of developing allergies and asthma.  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov "Why Phthalates Should Be Restricted or Banned from Consumer Products" Authors: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Summary: This article discusses how phthalates can leach into food from vinyl plastic equipment and materials, emphasizing the need for restrictions or bans due to associated health risks.  hsph.harvard.edu "Phthalates and Diet: A Review of the Food Monitoring and Epidemiology Data" Authors: Rolf U. Halden Summary: This review highlights epidemiological studies showing positive associations between the consumption of meats, discretionary fats, and dairy products with increased phthalate exposure.  ehjournal.biomedcentral.com "Personal Care Product Use Patterns in Association with Phthalate and Bisphenol A Exposure" Authors: Jessica T. Barson, John D. Meeker, and Kelly K. Ferguson Summary: This study investigates the relationship between personal care product usage and exposure to phthalates and BPA, finding significant associations that suggest these products are notable sources of exposure.  nature.com "What Are Phthalates and How Do They Affect Your Health?" Authors: National Center for Health Research Summary: This article provides an overview of phthalates as synthetic chemicals used to make plastics flexible and to add fragrance to products, discussing their role as endocrine disruptors and potential health effects, especially in young children.  center4research.org   Bibliography: Wang, Y., Zhu, H., & Kannan, Y. (2021). Phthalates and Their Impacts on Human Health. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 1-8.  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Latini, G., Del Vecchio, V., & Massaro, A. (2020). Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence of Their Impact on Human Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5655.  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. (2019). Why Phthalates Should Be Restricted or Banned from Consumer Products.  hsph.harvard.edu Halden, R. U. (2014). Phthalates and Diet: A Review of the Food Monitoring and Epidemiology Data. Environmental Health, 13(1), 43.  ehjournal.biomedcentral.com Barson, J. T., Meeker, J. D., & Ferguson, K. K. (2023). Personal Care Product Use Patterns in Association with Phthalate and Bisphenol A Exposure. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 33(1), 45-54.  nature.com National Center for Health Research. (2021). What Are Phthalates and How Do They Affect Your Health?.  center4research.org       What You'll Learn in This Episode: (00:00:00) Introduction – The toxic truth hiding in your everyday products. (00:03:19) What Are Phthalates? – The chemicals making plastics flexible (and your health fragile). (00:04:24) How Phthalates Get into Your Body – Food, air, water, and even medical devices. (00:05:50) The Devastating Health Effects of Phthalates – Endocrine disruption, infertility, and metabolic disease. (00:07:45) Why the U.S. Fails to Regulate Phthalates – The FDA, EPA, and corporate influence. (00:10:14) Why Europe Banned Phthalates (and the U.S. Didn't) – A look at the regulatory failures. (00:12:38) The Connection Between Phthalates & Infertility – How they are lowering sperm counts and harming pregnancy. (00:15:10) Processed Foods & Fast Foods—A Phthalate Hotspot – Why eating out could be dosing you with toxins. (00:18:49) The Hidden Dangers in Medical Devices – Why even hospitals aren't safe. (00:21:20) Minnesota's Groundbreaking SF 188 Bill – Why this legislation could change everything. (00:24:30) How Phthalates Are Even in Your Children's Toys – The shocking reality parents need to know. (00:27:15) The Impact of Phthalates on Weight Gain & Diabetes – How they disrupt metabolism. (00:30:07) The Fight for Transparency in the Food Industry – What's being done to expose these chemicals. (00:33:12) How to Reduce Your Phthalate Exposure – Simple swaps to detox your home and body. (00:36:40) What You Can Do Today – Advocacy, petitions, and making informed choices. (00:40:12) The Call to Action – Why raising awareness is the key to change.     Thank You to Our Sponsors: Our Place: Toxic-free, durable cookware that supports healthy cooking. Use code DARIN for 10% off at fromourplace.com. Therasage: Go to www.therasage.com and use code DARIN at checkout for 15% off     Find More From Darin: Website: darinolien.com Instagram: @darinolien Book: Fatal Conveniences     Key Takeaway: "Phthalates are everywhere—but they don't have to be inside you. Awareness is power, and it's time to fight back against the toxic chemicals hiding in plain sight."

The directive sent from acting deputy attorney general Emil Bove to drop the corruption charges against NYC Mayor Eric Adams has hit a fever pitch, so hosts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord use the bulk of this episode to break down this evolving story and what has come to light so far. They tick through how this standoff between federal prosecutors and the DOJ's directive has led to a slew of resignations, and what to watch for as Judge Dale Ho calls for a Wednesday hearing on the matter in Manhattan.  Andrew and Mary then take a beat to preview the first Supreme Court test of Trump's executive power, over his attempt to fire Hampton Dellinger, the head of the Office of Special Counsel, without cause. (Note: this office is an independent watchdog agency- not part of DOJ). And they wind up this episode by highlighting allegations from whistleblowers that Kash Patel, Trump's nominee to head the FBI, has been directing the firing of senior officials at the FBI.Further reading: Here is Andrew's piece in Just Security: The People of New York v. Mayor Adams: Will Manhattan DA Bragg Come to the Rescue Yet Again?Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts.

The flood of memos issued by newly minted Attorney General Pam Bondi in her first days was dizzying, so hosts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord zero in on several that have significant implications for national security and criminal law enforcement. Next, they give a rundown of litigation happening across the country, as courtrooms become the first defense in challenging some of President Trump's questionable orders. And last up, Andrew and Mary talk through a few legal battles brewing over sanctuary cities and detail Mary and ICAP's latest case aiming to protect places of worship as safe havens from immigration enforcement. And btw, the corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams just went poof-- they dissect that too.Further reading: Here is Just Security's Litigation Tracker: Legal Challenges to Trump Administration Actions.HERE is the DOJ memo dropping the corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams without prejudice.And here is the statement from the American Bar Association that Andrew and Mary spoke about: The ABA supports the rule of law.Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts.

Why did President Barack Obama start using words like “diversity, equity, and inclusion” instead of the typical "affirmative action"? Affirmative action was created to right the historic wrongs imposed on African Americans during the Jim Crow era, which included about 10% of the U.S. population. Obama used DEI to expand the terminology to anyone who isn't white. Why? Victor Davis Hanson argues in this edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words” that it was to dramatically increase the size of the historically marginalized constituency, allowing the Obama administration to implement its expansive woke agenda:  “Affirmative action was created during the civil rights era, 1964 and '65, and then, now, it has been with us almost 60 years. But remember what it was originally designed for—to address the historic racism and oppression of black Americans through slavery and Jim Crow, de facto segregation in some of the Northern states, but de jure segregation in the South. "And it said that because of that African Americans had not been given equality of opportunity. Statute never said anything about quotas or equality result ...  “When the Obama administration came in, they saw that that constituency was not big enough for the type of woke agenda that they were envisioning  "So, they recreated it. They used a word, “diversity.” And diversity then would morph in, during the Obama years, to “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” They added the “equity and inclusion” so you didn't obsess on race, which was the obsession. But they didn't want you to think about that. So then, all of a sudden, anybody was diverse on one qualification. "They were not white." For Victor's latest thoughts, go to: https://victorhanson.com/   Don't miss out on Victor's latest videos by subscribing to The Daily Signal today. You'll be notified every time a new video drops: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHqkXbgqrDrDVInBMSoGQgQ The Daily Signal cannot continue to tell stories like this one without the support of our viewers: https://secured.dailysignal.com/   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Allison and Andy read the first volume of Jack Smith's final report.Final Report on the Special Counsel's Investigations and Prosecutions Volume One The co-conspirators:1 - Rudy Giuliani 2 - John Eastman 3 - Sidney Powell4 - Jeffrey Clark5 - Kenneth Chesebro6 - Boris Epshteyn Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to knowRule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

Allison and Andy read the first volume of Jack Smith's final report.Final Report on the Special Counsel's Investigations and Prosecutions Volume One The co-conspirators:1 - Rudy Giuliani 2 - John Eastman 3 - Sidney Powell4 - Jeffrey Clark5 - Kenneth Chesebro6 - Boris Epshteyn Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to knowRule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

Jack Smith has resigned; the Justice Department released Volume One of the special counsel's final report; the fate of Volume Two remains to be seen; plus listener questions. Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to knowRule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

Allison and Andy read the first volume of Jack Smith's final report. Final Report on the Special Counsel's Investigations and Prosecutions Volume OneThe co-conspirators:1 - Rudy Giuliani 2 - John Eastman 3 - Sidney Powell4 - Jeffrey Clark5 - Kenneth Chesebro6 - Boris Epshteyn Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to knowRule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

Allison and Andy read the first volume of Jack Smith's final report. Final Report on the Special Counsel's Investigations and Prosecutions Volume OneThe co-conspirators:1 - Rudy Giuliani 2 - John Eastman 3 - Sidney Powell4 - Jeffrey Clark5 - Kenneth Chesebro6 - Boris EpshteynQuestions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to knowRule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

Allison reads the first volume of Jack Smith's final report. Final Report on the Special Counsel's Investigations and Prosecutions Volume OneThe co-conspirators:1 - Rudy Giuliani 2 - John Eastman 3 - Sidney Powell4 - Jeffrey Clark5 - Kenneth Chesebro6 - Boris Epshteyn Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to knowRule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P