Podcasts about statutes

Today the BIG guys discuss…NFL Trade Deadline, Ravens trades, Ravens recap, Pigskin Pick'em and “C'mon Yo!”

Die UN-Generalversammlung ist die Plattform, auf der 193 Staaten zusammenkommen können, um über die Zukunft zu diskutieren. Oft wird die UN-Generalversammlung deswegen auch als „Forum der Diskussion“ bezeichnet.In dieser Folge von UN Basics schauen wir uns an, was dieUN-Generalversammlung genau diskutiert und welchen Einfluss sie hat. Hier findest du die drei wichtigsten genutzten Quellen:Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2021) – Vereinte Nationen: Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen: https://www.bpb.de/themen/internationale-organisationen/vereinte-nationen/48586/generalversammlung-der-vereinten-nationen/Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Vereinten Nationen(2020) – UN Basis-Informationen 57: Die Vereinten Nationen im Überblick: https://dgvn.de/publications/PDFs/Basis_Informationen/BI_57_UN-im-Ueberblick.pdfUnited Nations (1945) Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice: https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf Redaktion & Moderation: Laura Stettner &Sophie FasshauerPost-Produktion: Erwin Eisenhardt & SophieFasshauer

The UN General Assembly is the platform through which 193 states can come together to discuss the future. This is why the UN General Assembly is often referred to as a ‘forum for discussion'.In this episode of UN Basics, we take a look at what exactly the UN General Assembly discusses and what influence it has. Here are the three most important sources used:Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2021) – Vereinte Nationen: Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen: https://www.bpb.de/themen/internationale-organisationen/vereinte-nationen/48586/generalversammlung-der-vereinten-nationen/Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Vereinten Nationen(2020) – UN Basis-Informationen 57: Die Vereinten Nationen im Überblick: https://dgvn.de/publications/PDFs/Basis_Informationen/BI_57_UN-im-Ueberblick.pdfUnited Nations (1945) Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice: https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdfEditing & Moderation: Laura Stettner & SophieFasshauerPost-production: Erwin Eisenhardt & SophieFasshauer

Speaker: Dr Yin Harn Lee, Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of BristolBiography: Dr Yin Harn Lee is a Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Bristol. Her research interests lie primarily in copyright law. A significant part of her research focuses on copyright and videogames, and she is also interested in historical aspects of copyright as well as the interface between intellectual property and personal property.Abstract: The exclusive right to control the copying or reproduction of a work has been described by one leading copyright treatise as ‘the most fundamental, and historically the oldest, right of a copyright owner'. The first British copyright statute, the 1710 Statute of Anne, conferred on rightholders the exclusive right to print and reprint their books. Since then, the right has expanded far beyond its legislative origins, and now encompasses acts of copying in both digital and analogue form, those that are both temporary and permanent, and those that are merely incidental to the use of the work. Scholars have expressed concern about the now-expansive scope of the right, and there have been calls to restrict the right (e.g. by removing ‘non-expressive copying' and copying that does not enable the use of the material in question ‘as a work') or to replace it altogether with a broad right of ‘commercial exploitation'.This paper will show that, while these proposals are laudable and inventive, they nevertheless encounter the same pitfalls as those faced by English courts in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries when called upon to define the scope of what constitutes ‘copying'. It will argue that the root of the problem lies in the absence of stable, developed principles for defining the legitimate scope of the rightholder's market, and that attempts at framing this as a question of statutory interpretation only obscure this fundamental fact.For more information see: https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars

Speaker: Dr Yin Harn Lee, Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of BristolBiography: Dr Yin Harn Lee is a Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Bristol. Her research interests lie primarily in copyright law. A significant part of her research focuses on copyright and videogames, and she is also interested in historical aspects of copyright as well as the interface between intellectual property and personal property.Abstract: The exclusive right to control the copying or reproduction of a work has been described by one leading copyright treatise as ‘the most fundamental, and historically the oldest, right of a copyright owner'. The first British copyright statute, the 1710 Statute of Anne, conferred on rightholders the exclusive right to print and reprint their books. Since then, the right has expanded far beyond its legislative origins, and now encompasses acts of copying in both digital and analogue form, those that are both temporary and permanent, and those that are merely incidental to the use of the work. Scholars have expressed concern about the now-expansive scope of the right, and there have been calls to restrict the right (e.g. by removing ‘non-expressive copying' and copying that does not enable the use of the material in question ‘as a work') or to replace it altogether with a broad right of ‘commercial exploitation'.This paper will show that, while these proposals are laudable and inventive, they nevertheless encounter the same pitfalls as those faced by English courts in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries when called upon to define the scope of what constitutes ‘copying'. It will argue that the root of the problem lies in the absence of stable, developed principles for defining the legitimate scope of the rightholder's market, and that attempts at framing this as a question of statutory interpretation only obscure this fundamental fact.For more information see: https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars

Today is Thursday, October 23. Here are some of the latest headlines from the Fargo, North Dakota area. InForum Minute is produced by Forum Communications and brought to you by reporters from The Forum of Fargo-Moorhead and WDAY TV. For more news from throughout the day, visit InForum.com

With tax debt comes the IRS's 10 Year Collection Statute of Limitations. Can bankruptcy have a huge effect on this number? Do you have tax debt? Call us at 866-8000-TAX or fill out the form at https://choicetaxrelief.com/If you want to see more…-YouTube:    / @loganallec  -Instagram: @ChoiceTaxRelief @LoganAllec -TikTok: @loganallec-Facebook: Choice Tax Relief // Logan Allec, CPA -Reddit:   / taxrelief   

Sometimes you just have to take a break from personal injury law and talk about treasure hunting. In this episode, we interview Lieutenant Commander and Navy JAG, Jordan Foley about maritime treasure law. Why? Because I didn't know anything about it and wanted to hit “record” while I learned. During this conversation, we take a “deep dive” into some of the misconceptions surrounding treasure law and some of the challenging legal arguments that come up during international treasure disputes. Visit Jordan online here: https://www.usni.org/people/jordan-foley. See all episodes or subscribe to the Personal Injury Marketing Minute here: https://optimizemyfirm.com/podcasts/. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eQ0BZ0M1V4 Transcript: Lindsey: Welcome to the Personal Injury Marketing Minute, where we quickly cover the hot topics in the legal marketing world. I'm your host, Lindsey Busfield. Well, I should amend my opening spiel. We usually cover the hot topics in the legal marketing world, but sometimes we're just going to talk about whatever I want to. I recently taught a CLE at the Maryland State Bar Association, and while I was there, I met Lieutenant Commander in Navy JAG, Jordan Foley. While he currently serves as the Department of Defense Fellow to Senator Mazie K. Hirono in Hawaii, he has a special background in naval warfare and a deep understanding of maritime treasure law. Knowing absolutely nothing about this myself, I wanted to take the opportunity to learn more about treasure law and invite you listeners to join me on this educational journey. Thank you so much for joining us today, Jordan.   JJ Foley: Absolutely. Thanks, Lindsey, for having me, and it was great meeting you in Ocean City, and I was glad we could talk a little A little bit.   Lindsey: And as I like to say, nerd out about treasure law. So that was fun. I mean, who doesn't love treasure law as kids? You know, we are taught to play pirates and you steal the treasure. My kids do this on their play set. You know, it's just kind of built into your childhood and development as a natural curiosity. So tell us a bit about your background and how you got involved in treasure law.   JJ Foley: Absolutely. I'll actually start with saying knowing more about treasure law takes some of the romance out of it, which we'll get into later. But it is a fun topic. But so, you know, as you stated, I'm an active duty Navy judge advocate. I started off my naval career as a submarine officer. So I got ship driving experience and deployment experience there. And they got selected for a Navy program where they sent me to law school and I became a Navy JAG through that. So I have a bit of a mix. I'm about 15 years into my career and half of it was spent on submarines and now about half of it as a judge advocate. And a lot of what I've focused on over the years has been. Naval warfare and legal analysis. So whether that is applying law to sea to board deploy missions, or sometimes weapons reviews, as I was doing at the Pentagon most recently before I joined Senator Verona's office as a defense fellow, a lot of it's been bridging the gap between my naval warfare experience and the legal and policy world.   Lindsey: And a lot of this comes with your understanding of international law, treaties, and working with our partners and allies, and sometimes even teaching and providing legal support for our partners and allies. So I've had this broad experience, and as one does in the beautiful profession of naval law and such, you find your interest areas, and mine became very quickly, for a lot of reasons you mentioned, treasure law, because it's cool and it's fun, and it's almost a bit of a hobby for me, too. But in the industry, in the private sector, it is an area that you have some specialized attorneys. He's in maritime and admiralty, and I like to see myself as maybe extra specialized with ad...

Join us this weekend as Pastor Jon continues the series, Discovering Deuteronomy with a message titled, Statutes and Ordinances based on Deuteronomy 4:5-14.

This conversation provides a comprehensive overview of tort law, focusing on the various types of damages, including compensatory, punitive, and nominal damages. It delves into the complexities of calculating damages, the role of vicarious liability, and the distinctions between wrongful death and survival actions. The discussion also covers important defenses such as mitigation of damages and the implications of statutes of limitations and repose. Overall, it serves as a valuable resource for understanding tort law and preparing for related exams.Imagine you're preparing for a torts exam, and one concept stands out as the linchpin of it all: damages. Whether it's negligence or intentional torts, the remedy is crucial. This post explores the intricacies of tort law, focusing on damages and vicarious liability.Compensatory Damages: Compensatory damages aim to address the actual loss or injury. They are divided into economic damages, like medical bills and lost wages, and non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. Understanding the distinction between lost earnings and loss of earning capacity is vital, as the former looks backward while the latter gazes into the future.Punitive and Nominal Damages: Punitive damages serve to punish and deter, requiring proof of an "evil mind." Nominal damages, though symbolic, confirm a legal right was violated, potentially unlocking significant attorney's fees.Vicarious Liability: Vicarious liability holds one party responsible for another's actions due to their relationship. The doctrine of respondeat superior is key, determining if an employer is liable for an employee's torts. The distinction between a frolic and a detour is crucial in assessing liability.Advanced Claims and Defenses: The post delves into wrongful death and survival actions, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between them. It also covers the economic loss rule, maintaining the boundary between tort and contract law, and the statutes of limitations and repose.Tort law is complex, with damages and vicarious liability at its core. Understanding these concepts is essential for anyone studying or practicing law. As the legal landscape evolves, staying informed is crucial. Subscribe now for more insights into the world of law.TakeawaysTort law revolves around remedies, primarily damages.Compensatory damages aim to make the plaintiff whole.Punitive damages serve to punish the defendant and deter future misconduct.Nominal damages are awarded to acknowledge a legal wrong without substantial harm.The collateral source rule prevents defendants from benefiting from the plaintiff's insurance.Future damages must be reasonably certain to occur to be recoverable.Non-economic damages are subjective and often capped by state laws.Vicarious liability holds employers responsible for employees' actions within the scope of employment.Loss of consortium claims are derivative and depend on the main injury claim's success.Statutes of limitations and repose set strict deadlines for filing lawsuits.tort law, negligence, damages, vicarious liability, compensatory damages, punitive damages, wrongful death, survival actions, legal remedies, law exam preparation

Time does not stop Treasury collections. Administrative Wage Garnishment and the Treasury Offset Program can both continue until the balance is resolved. Action helps. Use the right steps, meet deadlines, and keep documents organized. SBA & Federal Debt Advisory Services City: Hutto Address: 143 Exchange Blvd - Suite 300-41 Website: https://www.nontaxdebthelp.com

Police reports are often seen as the “official story” after a crash—but are they always accurate? In this episode of After the Crash Podcast, attorney David Craig and paralegal Holly Hines answer one of the most common questions families ask after a semi-truck wreck: how much weight should you give a police report?Police reports can provide details like witness names and statements, but they are not always complete—and sometimes they're wrong. Many families are surprised to learn:✔️ Reports are often delayed or missing information.✔️ Trucking companies may use them to their advantage.✔️ Reports can be challenged, corrected, or supplemented with investigation.✔️ A report alone doesn't determine fault in a truck accident case.David and Holly share stories where the initial report wrongly placed blame—and how deeper investigation uncovered the truth. They also explain what families can do if they believe a police report is inaccurate, and why hiring an experienced truck accident lawyer with the right team makes all the difference.—01:22 – Meet Steve Grover: Canadian Personal Injury Lawyer07:51 – Steve Grover's Story: Why He Chose Injury Law11:12 – Traumatic Brain Injuries in Personal Injury Cases18:08 – Jury Trials in Canada vs. the U.S.19:09 – Semi-Truck Accidents: How Long Cases Take in Canada21:56 – Legal Advertising: Canada vs. U.S. Lawyers23:12 – How to Find a Personal Injury Lawyer in Canada24:55 – Why Continuing Education Matters for Injury Lawyers27:37 – Steve Grover's Book Load 'Er Up and Drive Safe31:31 – What to Know About the Grover Law Firm33:16 – Why Resources Matter in Injury Cases37:53 – Hidden Insurance in Personal Injury Cases38:58 – Signs of a Trustworthy Law Firm40:11 – The Role of AI in Modern Law Firms42:25 – How Involved Steve Grover Is in Cases Today43:53 – Why Motorcycle Accident Cases Are a Focus for Grover45:24 – How Riding Shapes Steve Grover's Perspective46:37 – Premises Liability in Canadian Injury Law49:14 – Statute of Limitations in Canadian Injury Cases50:22 – Tort Reform: The Biggest Challenge for Injury Lawyers52:29 – How Steve Grover Gives Back to the Community—If you or someone you know has been involved in a truck crash, don't wait.Visit https://ckflaw.com or call 1-800-ASK-DAVID for experienced legal help.—Why Listen to After the Crash?Navigating the aftermath of a trucking accident can feel overwhelming, but you don't have to face it alone. This podcast is designed to educate and empower victims and their families, helping you make informed decisions about your future.—Learn About the Firm:At Craig, Kelley & Faultless, LLC, we've dedicated over 30 years to fighting for trucking accident victims. From preserving evidence to holding negligent trucking companies accountable, our mission is to protect your rights and secure the justice you deserve.—Download Semitruck Wreck for FREE:https://www.ckflaw.com/truck-accident-ebook/Follow Us on Socials:Website: https://www.ckflaw.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/ckflawLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/craig-kelley-&-faultless-attorneys-at-lawContact Us:Email: info@ckflaw.comPhone: 1-800-ASK-DAVID#TruckingAccidents #TruckWreckLawyer #PoliceReports #AfterTheCrashPodcast #Per

Hello Interactors,Fall is in full swing here in the northern hemisphere, which means it's time to turn our attention to economics and economic geography. Triggered by a recent podcast on the origins of capitalism, I thought I'd kick off by exploring this from a geography perspective.I trace how violence, dispossession, and racial hierarchy aren't simple externalities or accidents. They emerge out of a system that organized itself and then spread. Capitalism grew out of dispossession of land and human autonomy and became a dominant social and economic structure. It's rooted in violence that became virtuous and centuries later is locked-in. Or is it?EMERGING ENGLISH ENCLOSURESThe dominant and particular brand of capitalism in force today originates in England. Before English landlords and the state violently seized common lands back in the 1300s, economic life was embedded in what historian E.P. Thompson called “moral economies”.(1) These were systems of survival where collective responsibility was managed through custom, obligation, and shared access to resources. Similar systems existed elsewhere. Long before Europeans arrived at the shores of what is now called North America, Haudenosaunee longhouse economies were sophisticatedly organized around economies of reciprocity. Further south, Andean ayllu communities negotiated labor obligations and access to land was shared. West African systems featured land that belonged to communities and ancestors, not individuals.Back in medieval English villages, commons weren't charity, they were infrastructure. Anyone could graze animals or gather firewood. When harvests failed, there were fallbacks like hunting and gathering rights, seasonal labor sharing, and kin networks. As anthropologist Stephen Gudeman shows, these practices reflected cultures of mutual insurance aimed at collective resilience, not individual accumulation.(2)Then landlords, backed by state violence, destroyed this system to enrich themselves.From 1348-1349, the bubonic plague killed perhaps half of England's population. This created a labor shortage that gave surviving so-called peasants leverage. For the first time they could demand higher wages, refuse exploitative landlords, or move to find better conditions.The elite mobilized state violence to reverse this. In 1351 the state passed The Statute of Labourers — an attempt to freeze wages and restrict worker movement. This serves as an early signal that reverberates today. When property and people come in conflict, the state sides with property. Over the next two centuries, landlords steadily enclosed common lands, claiming shared space as private property. Peasants who resisted were evicted, sometimes killed.Initial conditions mattered enormously. England had a relatively weak monarchy that couldn't check landlord aggression like stronger European states did. It also had growing urban markets creating demand for food and wool and post-plague labor dynamics that made controlling land more profitable than extracting rents from secure peasants.As historian J.M. Neeson details, enclosure — fencing in private land — destroyed social infrastructure.(3) When access to common resources disappeared, so did the safety nets that enabled survival outside of market and labor competition. People simply lost the ability to graze a cow, gather fuel, glean grain, or even rely on neighbors' obligation to help.This created a feedback loop:Each turn made the pattern stronger. Understanding how this happens requires grasping how these complex systems shaped the very people who reproduced them.The landlords driving enclosure weren't simply greedy villains. Their sense of self, their understanding of what was right and proper, was constituted through relationships to other people like them, to their own opportunities, and to authorities who validated their actions. A landlord enclosing commons likely experienced this as “improvement”. They believed they were making the land productive while exercising newly issued property rights. Other landlords were doing it, parliament legalized it, and the economics of the time justified it. The very capacity to see alternatives was constrained by relational personal and social positions within an emerging capitalistic society.This doesn't excuse the violence or diminish responsibility. But it does reveal how systems reproduce themselves. This happens not primarily through individual evil but through relationships and feedback loops that constitute people's identities and sense of what's possible. The moral judgment remains stark. These were choices that enriched someone by destroying someone else's means of survival. But the choices were made by people whose very selfhood was being constructed by the system they were creating.Similarly, displaced peasants resisted in ways their social positions made possible. They rioted, appealed to historical customary rights, attempted to maintain the commons they relied on for centuries. Each turn of the spiral didn't just move resources, it remade people. Peasants' children, born into a world without commons, developed identities shaped by market dependence — renting their labor in exchange for money. What had been theft became, over generations, simply “how things are.”By the mid-16th century, England had something new. They'd created a system where most people owned no land, had no customary rights to subsistence, and had to compete in labor markets to survive. This was the essence of capitalism's emergence. It wasn't born out of markets (they existed everywhere for millennia) but as market dependence enforced through dispossession. Out of this emerged accumulated actions of actors whose awareness and available alternatives were themselves being shaped by the very system they were simultaneously shaping and sustaining.REPLICATING PATTERNS OF PLANTATIONSOnce capitalism emerged in England through violent enclosure, its spread wasn't automatic. Understanding how it became global requires distinguishing between wealth extraction (which existed under many systems) and capitalist social relations (which require specific conditions).Spain conquered vast American territories, devastating indigenous populations through disease, warfare, and forced labor. Spanish extraction from mines in the 16th century — like Potosí in today's Bolivia — were worked by enslaved indigenous and African peoples under conditions that killed them in staggering numbers. Meanwhile, Portugal developed Atlantic island sugar plantations using enslaved African labor. This expansion of Portuguese agriculture on Atlantic islands like Madeira and São Tomé became a blueprint for plantation economies in the Americas, particularly Brazil. The brutally efficient system perfected there for sugar production — relying on the forced labor of enslaved Africans — was directly transplanted across the ocean, leading to a massive increase in the scale and violence of the transatlantic slave trade.Both empires generated massive wealth from these practices. If colonial plunder caused capitalism, Spain and Portugal should have industrialized first. Instead, they stagnated. The wealth flowed to feudal monarchies who spent it on palaces, armies, and wars, not productive reinvestment. Both societies remained fundamentally feudal.England, with virtually no empire during its initial capitalist transformation, developed differently because it had undergone a different structural violence — enclosure of common land that created landless workers, wage dependence, and market competition spiraling into self-reinforcing patterns.But once those capitalist social relations existed, they became patterns that spread through violent imposition. These patterns destroyed existing economic systems and murdered millions.English expansion first began close to home. Ireland and Scotland experienced forced enclosures as English landlords exported the template — seize land, displace people, create private regimes, and force the suffering to work for you. This internal colonialism served as testing ground for techniques later deployed around the world.When English capitalism encountered the Caribbean — lands where indigenous peoples had developed complex agricultural systems and trade networks — the Spanish conquest had already devastated these populations. English merchants and settlers completed the destruction, seizing lands indigenous peoples had managed for millennia while expanding the brutal, enslaved-based labor models pioneered by the Spanish and Portuguese for mining and sugar production.The plantations English capitalists built operated differently than earlier Portuguese and Spanish systems. English plantation owners were capitalists, not feudal lords. But this was also not simply individual choice or moral character. They were operating within and being shaped by an emerging system of capitalist social relations. Here too they faced competitive pressures to increase output, reduce costs, and compete with other plantation owners. The system's logic — accumulate to accumulate more — emerged from relational dynamics between competing capitalists. The individual identities as successful plantation owners was constituted through their position within the competitive networks in which they coexisted.New location, same story. Even here this systemic shaping doesn't absolve individual responsibility for the horrors they perpetrated. Enslaved people were still kidnapped, brutalized, and worked to death. Indigenous peoples were still murdered and their lands still stolen. But understanding how the system shaped what seemed necessary or moral to those positioned to benefit helps explain how such horror could be so widespread and normalized.This normalization created new spirals:This pattern then replicated across even more geographies — Jamaica, Barbados, eventually the American South — each iteration destroying existing ways of life. As anthropologist Sidney Mintz showed, this created the first truly global capitalist commodity chain.(4) Sugar produced by enslaved Africans and indigenous peoples — on their stolen land — sweetened the tea for those English emerging factory workers — themselves recently dispossessed through enclosure.At the same time, it's worth calling attention, as Historians Walter Rodney, Guyanese, and Paul Tiyambe Zeleza, Malawian, have point out, that African societies weren't passive.(5,6) Some kingdoms initially engaged strategically by trading captives from rival groups and acquiring weapons. These choices are often judged harshly, but they were made by people facing threats to their very existence. They were working with frameworks developed over centuries that suddenly confronted an unprecedented system of extractive violence. Historians Linda Heywood and John Thornton show that African economic strength and political organization meant Africans often “forced Europeans to deal with them on their own terms” for centuries, even as the terms of engagement became increasingly constrained.(7) This moral complexity matters. These were real choices with devastating consequences, made by people whose capacity to perceive alternatives was constrained by their eventual oppressors amidst escalating violence by Europeans.Native American scholars have documented similar patterns of constrained agency in indigenous contexts. Historian Ned Blackhawk, Western Shoshone, shows how Native nations across North America made strategic choices — like forming alliances, adapting governance structures, and engaging in trade — all while navigating impossible pressures from colonial expansion.(8) Historian Jean O'Brien, White Earth Ojibwe, demonstrates how New England indigenous communities persisted and adapted even as settler narratives and violence worked to wipe them out of existence.(9) They were forced to make choices about land, identity, and survival within systems designed to eliminate them. These weren't failures of resistance but strategic adaptations made by people whose frameworks for understanding and practicing sovereignty, kinship, and territorial rights were being violently overwritten and overtaken by colonial capitalism.Europeans increasingly controlled these systems through superior military technology making resistance futile. Only when late 19th century industrial weapons were widely wielded — machine guns, munitions, and mechanisms manufactured through capitalism's own machinations — could Europeans decisively overwhelm resistance and complete the colonial carving of Africa, the Americas, and beyond.LOCKING-IN LASTING LOOPSOnce patterns spread and stabilize, they become increasingly difficult to change. Not because they're natural, but because they're actively maintained by those who benefit.Capitalism's expansion created geographic hierarchies that persist today: core regions that accumulate wealth and peripheral regions that get extracted from. England industrialized first through wealth stolen from colonies and labor dispossessed through enclosure. This gave English manufacturers advantages. Namely, they could sell finished goods globally while importing cheap raw materials. Colonies were forced at gunpoint to specialize in export commodities, making them dependent on manufactured imports. That dependence made it harder to develop their own industries. Once the loop closed it became enforced — to this day through institutions like the IMF and World Bank.Sociologists Marion Fourcade and Kieran Healy show how these hierarchies get naturalized through moral categories that shape how people — including those benefiting from and those harmed by the system — come to understand themselves and others.(10) Core regions are portrayed as “developed,” “modern,” “efficient.” Peripheral regions are called “backward,” “corrupt,” “informal.” These aren't just ideological justifications imposed from above but categories that constitute people's identities. They shape how investors see opportunities, how policy makers perceive problems, and how individuals understand their own worth.Meanwhile, property rights established through colonial theft get treated as legitimate. They are backed by international law and written by representatives of colonial powers as Indigenous land claims continue to get dismissed as economically backward. This doesn't happen through conscious conspiracies. It's because the frameworks through which “economic rationality” itself is understood and practiced were constructed through and for capitalist social relations. People socialized into these frameworks genuinely perceive capitalist property relations as more efficient, more rational. Their (our?) very capacity to see alternatives is constrained by identities formed within the system in which they (we?) exist.These patterns persist because they're profitable for those with power and because people with power were shaped by the very system that gives them power. Each advantage reinforces others. It then gets defended, often by people who genuinely believe they're defending rationality and efficiency. They (we?) fail to fathom how their (our?) frameworks for understanding economy were forged through forceful and violent subjugation.INTERRUPTING INTENSIFICATIONViewing capitalism's complex geographies shows its evolution is not natural or even inevitable. It emerged, and continues to evolve, as a result of shifting relationships and feedbacks at multiple scales. Recognizing this eventuality creates space for imagining and building more ethical derivatives or alternatives.If capitalism emerged from particular violent interactions between people in specific places, then different interactions could produce different systems. If patterns locked in through feedback loops that benefit some at others' expense, then interrupting those loops becomes possible.Even within capitalist nations, alternative arrangements have persisted or been fought for. Nordic countries and Scotland maintain “Everyman's Right” or “Freedom to Roam” laws. These are legal traditions allowing public access to private land for recreation, foraging, and camping. These represent partial commons that survived enclosure or were restored through political struggle, showing that private property needn't mean total exclusion. Even in countries that participate in capitalist economies. In late 19th century America, Henry George became one of the nation's most widely read public intellectuals. More people attended his funeral than Abraham Lincoln's. He argued that land value increases resulting from community development should be captured through land value taxes rather than enriching individual owners. His ideas inspired single-tax colonies, urban reform movements, and influenced progressive era policies. Farmers organized cooperatives and mutual aid societies, pooling resources and labor outside pure market competition. Urban communities established settlement houses, cooperative housing, and neighborhood commons. These weren't marginal experiments, they were popular movements showing that even within capitalism's heartland, people continuously organized alternatives based on shared access, collective benefit, and relationships of reciprocity rather than pure commodity exchange.Or, consider these current examples operating at different scales and locations:Community land trusts in cities like Burlington, Vermont remove properties from speculative markets. These trusts separate ownership of the land from the buildings on it, allowing the nonprofit land trust to retain ownership of the land while selling homes at affordable prices with resale restrictions. While they're trying to break the feedback loop where rising prices displace residents, gentrification and displacement continue in surrounding market-rate housing. This shows how alternatives require scale and time to fully interrupt established feedback loops.Zapatista autonomous municipalities in Chiapas, Mexico governed 300,000 people through indigenous forms of collective decision-making, refusing both state control and capitalist markets — surviving decades of Mexican government counterinsurgency backed by US military support. In 2023, after three decades of autonomy, the Zapatistas restructured into thousands of hyperlocal governments, characterizing the shift as deepening rather than retreating from their fundamental rejection of capitalist control.Brazil's Landless Workers Movement has won land titles for 350,000 families through occupations of unused land. These are legally expropriated under Brazil's constitutional requirement that land fulfill a social function. Organizing 2,000 cooperative settlements across 7.5 million hectares, this movement has become Latin America's largest social movement and Brazil's leading producer of organic food. They're building schools, health clinics, and cooperative enterprises based on agroecology and direct democracy.(11) Still, titled arable farmland in Brazil is highly concentrated into a minuscule percent of the overall population. Meanwhile, capitalist state structures continue favoring agribusiness and large landowners despite the movement's successes with organic food production.Indigenous land back movements across North America demand return of stolen territories as restoration of indigenous governance systems organized around relationships to land and other beings rather than ownership. Through the InterTribal Buffalo Council, 82 tribes are restoring buffalo herds. The Blackfeet Nation is establishing a 30,000-acre buffalo reserve that reconnects fragmented prairie ecosystems and restores buffalo migrations crossing the US-Canada border, reclaiming transnational governance systems that predate colonial boundaries.These aren't isolated utopian fantasies, and they're not perfect, but they're functioning alternatives, each attempting to interrupt capitalism's spirals at different points and places. Still, they face enormous opposition because for some reason, existing powerful systems that claim to embrace competition don't seem to like it much.Let's face it, other complex and functional economic systems existed before capitalism destroyed them. Commons-based systems, gift economies, reciprocal obligations organized around kinship and place were sophisticated solutions to survival. And extractive and exploitive capitalism violently replaced them. Most of all them. There are still pockets around the world where other economic geographies persist — including informal economies, mutual aid networks, cooperative enterprises, and indigenous governance systems.I recognize I've clearly over simplified what is a much more layered and complex evolution, and existing alternatives aren't always favorable nor foolproof. But neither is capitalism. There is no denying the dominant forms of capitalism of today emerged in English fields through violent enclosure of shared space. It then spread through transformation of existing extraction systems into engines of competitive accumulation. And it locked in through feedback loops that benefit core regions while extracting from peripheral ones.But it also took hold in hearts and habits. It's shaping how we understand ourselves, what seems possible, and what feels “normal.” We've learned to see accumulation as virtue, competition as natural, individual success as earned and poverty as personal failure. The very category of the autonomous ‘individual' — separate, self-made, solely responsible for their own outcomes — is itself a capitalist construction that obscures how all achievement and hardship emerge from relational webs of collective conditions. This belief doesn't just justify inequality, it reproduces it by generating the anxiety and shame that compel people to rent even more of their time and labor to capitalism. Pausing, resting, healing, caring for others, or resisting continue exploitation marks them as haven chosen their own ruin — regardless of their circumstance or relative position within our collective webs. These aren't just ideologies imposed from above but the makings of identity itself for all of us socialized within capitalism. A financial analyst optimizing returns, a policy maker promoting market efficiency, an entrepreneur celebrating “self-made” innovation — these aren't necessarily cynical actors. They're often people whose very sense of self has been shaped by a system they feel compelled to reproduce. After all, the system rewards individualism — even when it's toxins poison the collective web — including the web of life.Besides, if capitalism persists only through the conscious choices of so-called evil people, then exposing their villainy should be sufficient. Right? The law is there to protect innocent people from evil-doers. Right? Not if it persists through feedback loops that shape the identities, perceptions, and moral frameworks of everyone within it — including or especially those who benefit most or have the most to lose. It seems change requires not just moral condemnation but transformation of the relationships and systems that constitute our very selves. After all, anyone participating is complicit at some level. And what choice is there? For a socio-economic political system that celebrates freedom of choice, it offers little.To challenge a form of capitalism that can create wealth and prosperity but also unhealthy precarity isn't just to oppose policies or demand redistribution, and it isn't simply to condemn those who benefit from it as moral failures. It's to recognize that the interactions between people and places that created this system through violence could create other systems through different choices. Making those different choices requires recognizing and reconstructing the very identities, relationships, and frameworks through which we understand ourselves and what's possible. Perhaps even revealing a different form of capitalism that cares.But it seems we'd need new patterns to be discussed and debated by the very people who keep these patterns going. We're talking about rebuilding economic geographies based on mutual respect, shared responsibility, and a deep connection to our communities. To each other. This rebuilding needs to go beyond just changing institutions, it has to change the very people those institutions have shaped.As fall deepens and we watch leaves and seeds spiral down, notice how each follows a path predetermined by its inherited form. Maple seeds spin like helicopters — their propeller wings evolved over millennia to slow descent and scatter offspring far from competition. Their form has been fashioned by evolutionary forces beyond any individual seed's control, shaped by gusts and gravity in environments filled with a mix of competition and cooperation — coopetition. Then reflect on this fundamental difference: Unlike seeds locked into their descent, we humans can collectively craft new conditions, consciously charting courses that climb, curl, cascade, or crash.ReferencesChibber, V., & Nashek, M. (Hosts). (2025, September 24). The origins of capitalism. [Audio podcast episode]. In Confronting Capitalism. Jacobin Radio.1. Thompson, E. P. (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past & Present, 50(1), 76–136.2. Gudeman, S. (2016). Anthropology and economy. Cambridge University Press.3. Neeson, J. M. (1996). Commoners: Common right, enclosure and social change in England, 1700–1820. Cambridge University Press.4. Mintz, S. W. (1985). Sweetness and power: The place of sugar in modern history. Viking Penguin.5. Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L'Ouverture.6. Zeleza, P. T. (1997). A modern economic history of Africa: The nineteenth century (Vol. 1). East African Publishers.7. Heywood, L. M., & Thornton, J. K. (2007). Central Africans, Atlantic creoles, and the foundation of the Americas, 1585-1660. Cambridge University Press.8. Blackhawk, N. (2023). The rediscovery of America: Native peoples and the unmaking of US history. Yale University Press.9. OBrien, J. M. (2010). Firsting and lasting: Writing Indians out of existence in New England. U of Minnesota Press.10. Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2017). Seeing like a market. Socio-Economic Review, 15(1), 9–29.11. Carter, M. (Ed.). (2015). Challenging social inequality: The landless rural workers movement and agrarian reform in Brazil. Duke University Press. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit interplace.io

 Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter discuss James Comey potentially being a target of the Trumpadministration, focusing on charges of lying to Congress under the broader false statements statute (1001), rather than traditional perjury. Proof of "willfulness" is required, which signifies a heightened mental state and understanding of illegality. They also analyze the Supreme Court's delay in ruling on President Trump's effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, deferring oral arguments until January.Preview: Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter discuss James Comey potentially being a target of the Trumpadministration, focusing on charges of lying to Congress under the broader false statements statute (1001), rather than traditional perjury. Proof of "willfulness" is required, which signifies a heightened mental state and understanding of illegality. They also analyze the Supreme Court's delay in ruling on President Trump's effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, deferring oral arguments until January. 1824 SCOTUS

 Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter discuss James Comey potentially being a target of the Trumpadministration, focusing on charges of lying to Congress under the broader false statements statute (1001), rather than traditional perjury. Proof of "willfulness" is required, which signifies a heightened mental state and understanding of illegality. They also analyze the Supreme Court's delay in ruling on President Trump's effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, deferring oral arguments until January.Preview: Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter discuss James Comey potentially being a target of the Trumpadministration, focusing on charges of lying to Congress under the broader false statements statute (1001), rather than traditional perjury. Proof of "willfulness" is required, which signifies a heightened mental state and understanding of illegality. They also analyze the Supreme Court's delay in ruling on President Trump's effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, deferring oral arguments until January.

What makes Canadian personal injury law different from the United States? In this episode of After the Crash Podcast, David Craig sits down with Calgary lawyer Steve Grover to explore the key differences between Canadian and U.S. personal injury cases.From jury trials to tort reform, trucking accident timelines to traumatic brain injuries, Steve explains how Canadian law shapes outcomes for injury victims and their families. He also shares his story, why motorcycle cases are a major part of his practice, and how his book Load 'Er Up and Drive Safe helps educate drivers about sharing the road with semis.✔️ Key differences between Canadian & U.S. injury law✔️ How semi-truck accident cases are handled in Canada✔️ Why tort reform is a major challenge for victims✔️ Finding the right lawyer in Canada: tips for families✔️ Steve Grover's perspective as both a lawyer and riderThis episode is for anyone who wants to understand how personal injury law works in Canada—and what families need to know after a serious truck or motorcycle accident.—01:22 – Meet Steve Grover: Canadian Personal Injury Lawyer07:51 – Steve Grover's Story: Why He Chose Injury Law11:12 – Traumatic Brain Injuries in Personal Injury Cases18:08 – Jury Trials in Canada vs. the U.S.19:09 – Semi-Truck Accidents: How Long Cases Take in Canada21:56 – Legal Advertising: Canada vs. U.S. Lawyers23:12 – How to Find a Personal Injury Lawyer in Canada24:55 – Why Continuing Education Matters for Injury Lawyers27:37 – Steve Grover's Book Load 'Er Up and Drive Safe31:31 – What to Know About the Grover Law Firm33:16 – Why Resources Matter in Injury Cases37:53 – Hidden Insurance in Personal Injury Cases38:58 – Signs of a Trustworthy Law Firm40:11 – The Role of AI in Modern Law Firms42:25 – How Involved Steve Grover Is in Cases Today43:53 – Why Motorcycle Accident Cases Are a Focus for Grover45:24 – How Riding Shapes Steve Grover's Perspective46:37 – Premises Liability in Canadian Injury Law49:14 – Statute of Limitations in Canadian Injury Cases50:22 – Tort Reform: The Biggest Challenge for Injury Lawyers52:29 – How Steve Grover Gives Back to the Community—If you or someone you know has been involved in a truck crash, don't wait.Visit https://ckflaw.com or call 1-800-ASK-DAVID for experienced legal help.—Why Listen to After the Crash?Navigating the aftermath of a trucking accident can feel overwhelming, but you don't have to face it alone. This podcast is designed to educate and empower victims and their families, helping you make informed decisions about your future.—Learn About the Firm:At Craig, Kelley & Faultless, LLC, we've dedicated over 30 years to fighting for trucking accident victims. From preserving evidence to holding negligent trucking companies accountable, our mission is to protect your rights and secure the justice you deserve.—Download Semitruck Wreck for FREE:https://www.ckflaw.com/truck-accident-ebook/Follow Us on Socials:Website: https://www.ckflaw.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/ckflawLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/craig-kelley-&-faultless-attorneys-at-lawContact Us:Email: info@ckflaw.comPhone: 1-800-ASK-DAVID#PersonalInjuryLaw #TruckAccidents #CanadaLaw #AfterTheCrashPodcast #LegalHelp

This conversation delves into the critical doctrines of contract law, specifically the Statute of Frauds (SOF) and the Parole Evidence Rule (PER). It explores their roles in determining enforceability and the terms of contracts, respectively. The discussion highlights the UCC's exceptions, common law principles, and the philosophical debates surrounding formalism versus contextualism in contract law. Through case studies and practical applications, the conversation aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of these doctrines and their implications for legal practice.In the world of contract law, the Statute of Frauds (SOF) stands as a crucial doctrine, acting as a gatekeeper to determine whether a contract is enforceable. This legal principle requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be legally binding, ensuring clarity and preventing fraudulent claims.The Origins and Purpose of the Statute of FraudsThe Statute of Frauds dates back to 17th century England, designed to curb fraudulent practices by requiring written evidence for specific agreements. Its primary purpose is to prevent perjury and misunderstandings in contractual obligations, providing a safeguard against false claims based on oral agreements.Key Contracts Under the Statute of FraudsThe SOF typically applies to contracts involving significant transactions, such as:Agreements for the sale of goods over a certain value, often $500 or more. Contracts that cannot be performed within one year. Real estate transactions. Promises to pay another's debt.These categories ensure that substantial agreements are documented, reducing the risk of disputes and providing a clear record of the parties' intentions.Exceptions and FlexibilityWhile the SOF mandates written contracts for certain agreements, it also allows for exceptions. For instance, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides flexibility, permitting oral contracts in some cases if there is sufficient evidence of the agreement, such as partial performance or admissions in court.The Balance Between Formalism and FairnessThe application of the SOF often reflects a balance between formalism and fairness. Formalists emphasize the importance of written agreements for predictability and certainty, while contextualists advocate for considering the parties' true intentions, even if not perfectly documented.Conclusion: The SOF's Role in Modern Contract LawThe Statute of Frauds remains a vital component of contract law, ensuring that significant agreements are documented and enforceable. By requiring written evidence, it protects parties from fraudulent claims and misunderstandings, while also allowing for flexibility in certain situations. Understanding the SOF is essential for anyone navigating the complexities of contract law, as it underscores the importance of clarity and documentation in legal agreements.Subscribe now to stay informed about the latest insights in contract law and other legal topics.TakeawaysThe Statute of Frauds determines if a contract requires a writing.The Parole Evidence Rule governs the admissibility of evidence regarding contract terms.UCC Section 2201 sets a low bar for writing requirements in goods contracts.Exceptions to SOF include specially manufactured goods and admissions in court.Integration levels (complete, partial, not integrated) affect the application of PER.Merger clauses indicate intent for complete integration of terms.Extrinsic evidence cannot contradict express terms in a written contract.Contextualism in contract law seeks to uncover true intent of the parties.Judicial intervention can alter contracts based on unforeseen circumstances.The balance between predictability and fairness is a core tension in contract law.contract law, statute of frauds, parole evidence rule, UCC, legal doctrines, enforceability, contract terms, legal exceptions, common law, promissory estoppel

Gregg Jarrett joins Marc Cox and Dan Buck to discuss James Comey's legal situation, the statute of limitations, and perjury by public officials. They cover the Russia investigation, presidential pardons, and accountability for figures like John Brennan and Andrew McCabe across recent administrations.

In this episode, the podcast's 80th, Jordan discusses two cases from Federal Districts in Texas and New York that address the statute of limitations, limited authorization to use trade secrets, and the reasonable measures to maintain secrecy requirement.   

When stating ISO Management System ‘compliance', that in reality means the conformance to ISO Standard requirements, compliance in ISO terminology actually refers to compliance with legal and other statutory regulations. It may sound like semantics, but the difference is distinct for a reason, as you don't get a ‘non-compliance' for not meeting requirements, rather you get a ‘non-conformity'. When it comes to compliance with the law as required by ISO Standards, you need more than a Legal Register to prove compliance. In this episode, Ian Battersby dives into what is meant by compliance in ISO, how this relates to legal and statutory requirements, and how businesses can effectively evaluate compliance. You'll learn ·      What is the difference between ‘Compliance' and ‘Conformity'? ·      What are the different types of compliance requirements? ·      How do Acts and Regulations work in tandem? ·      Who enforces legal compliance requirements? ·      Where do these requirements sit in ISO Standards? ·      How do you prove compliance within ISO management? ·      How do you evaluate effective compliance?   Resources ·      Isologyhub ·      From Silos to Synergy: The benefits of Implementing an Integrated ISO Management System Webinar registration   In this episode, we talk about: [00:30] Upcoming webinar: If you'd like to learn more about the benefits of integrated management systems, feel free to register for our upcoming webinar here. [01:30] Episode Summary – Ian Battersby discusses the topic of compliance within ISO Standards, and how you can effectively evaluate it within your Management System.     [02:30] What is the difference between ‘Compliance' and ‘Conformity'? It's a common misconception that you ‘comply' with an ISO Standard, when in reality, you conform to an ISO Standard, hence why you can receive a ‘non-conformity' in audits and not ‘noncompliance'. When we talk about compliance within ISO Management, this refers to compliance with the law, regulations and other statutory requirements, as this is a requirement within all ISO Standards. [03:50] What are the different types of compliance requirements? There are many different types of law, Ian focuses on what is known as statute law legislation, as this is distinct from common law, case law and constitutional conventions. Statute law legislation is clearly written and can be cited in something like a Legal Register, or Register of Compliance Obligations. There are different types of legislation that you'll need to document, including: Primary Legislation: These are put in place by acts of UK Parliament and may have involvement from devolved administrations as well. Statutory compliance refers to compliance with primary legislation. An example of this type of legislation includes the Health & Safety at Work Act. Secondary or delegated legislation: Those primary Acts often require a lot more detail regarding the practicalities of applying them, which is delivered through Secondary or delegated legislation, otherwise more commonly known as regulations. These have more input from relevant public bodies to provide the requirements that can be applied. Both regulations are issues under Statutory Instruments (SI's), which are the formal legal vehicle that gives them effect. Put simply, regulations are the rules and Statutory Instruments are the legal mechanism which brings those rules into effect. [06:05] How Acts and Regulations work in tandem: Taking the Health & Safety at Work Act as an example, at the start this was quite a broad and generic act, it wasn't until years later that the workplace health, safety and welfare regulations came about to support the Act. This was further bolstered with the Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations. Both regulations were developed through consultation between Government departments and other bodies such as the Health & Safety Executive. These regulations gave companies much more detail on what's actually required in order to comply with the Health & Safety at Work Act. [06:50] Who enforces legal requirements? – It's not just the police that enforce legal requirements, there are a number of other bodies independent of government and the judiciary that can enforce regulations and prosecute for breaches caused by organisations and individuals. This can include bodies such as The Health & Safety Executive, The Financial Conduct Authority, The Environment Agency and the Information Commissioners Office. There are more for other areas, and these are often the bodies involved in the development of specific regulations. [07:45] Where do these requirements sit in ISO Standards? As Is the case with ISO Standards, the requirement for compliance is sprinkled throughout the whole document. Starting with Clause 4 Context. Here ‘Interested parties' are a focus, of which regulatory bodies can be considered an interested party, as they control the regulations that you are required to comply with by law. Even if you don't think you fall under specific legislation, there are still general applicable business laws that all businesses must comply with. So this exercise is not simply a case of running a Management System, it's also about running an effective business.  Ian highlights clause 6.1.3 in ISO 45001, which states the need to determine legal requirements applicable to your business, whereas in ISO 14001 this clause talks about compliance obligations. Despite the difference in wording, they are essentially looking for the same thing, which is detailing what legal requirements you need to comply with. In ISO 9001 it also states that any products or services offered should meet customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. This is then further strengthened in the Leadership clause as leaders are required to ensure that their commitments meet all customer requirements, but also any applicable regulatory and statutory requirements associated with the products and service. This is phrasing that is repeated throughout ISO 9001. Going back to ISO 45001 and ISO 14001, both also require an evaluation of compliance, both the part of monitoring and measuring and the results of them to be submitted through your management review process. The Standards are very clear in that they require you to determine the frequency and methods for evaluation of compliance. [12:00] How do you prove compliance within ISO management? In ISO 45001 there is an appendix that give examples of what you can monitor and measure for the fulfilment and evaluation of legal requirements. As mentioned, many organisations opt to use a Legal Register which states all applicable legislation for your business that will be evaluated in an Internal Audit, but proving genuine compliance is much more than just acknowledging the legislation itself. For larger organisations, this can be a very burdensome task, especially if you find yourself in a position where legal requirements aren't being met. Ian provides an example to illustrate how to prove effective compliance: Waste removal is something that every business has to do, whether they do so through a waste management contractor, or through a landlord, the law states that any waste you generate must be removed, transferred, processed, treated, etc. by licenced organisation in a very specifically regulated fashion. You as an organisation or your landlord may receive an annual season ticket which includes the required demonstration of compliance, which can be in the form of West Carrier license number, the types of waste, the classification codes under the European or waste catalogue, dates and signatures. Now if you run into an instance where something on that waste transfer note was incorrect, like a wrong address or waste type, how do you prove that you were still compliant in the actual activity of removing waste? An Audit will pick up on the note discrepancies and you may be faced with being non-compliant. A way to ensure that you have a record of compliance is to keep electronic copies of all your waste transfer notes, and keep them in a central location, or even possibly linked within your Legal Register if possible. Despite the discrepancy, you will be able to prove that you have a prior record of compliance. Ian gives another example, you may have air conditioning in your area of work that's due for a service. The contractor will need to verify the engineer before you engage with them, including a check to see if they're competent under F Gas Regulations and hold a valid REFCOM Registration Certificate. If you wait to check / validate their certificates of competence, you may run into a situation where they may have an expired certificate at the time that they serviced your aircon, and so that may render that service as inadequate under your legal requirements. To avoid this, you should reference that you've evaluated the contractor within your Legal Register, this would include a check on their registration number and dates of when their F Gas competency certificates are valid, ensuring your service falls within those dates. In short, to demonstrate compliance, you should be keeping on-going records in relation to your legal requirements. These should also be readily available and easily accessible. [20:35] How do you evaluate effective compliance:  Legal requirements such as the Health & Safety at Work Act are much broader, and it can be difficult to know exactly what records you need to keep to prove compliance. This is where the supporting regulations can provide the required detail and provide a much clearer picture of what evidence is required. One example is the requirement to carry out sufficient risk assessments, which requires you to identify hazards, assess risks, determine control measures you know, communicate those to people, and review of those assessments regularly. You as the business will need to create a programme to manage the risk assessment process, and this should be documented somewhere, including a note of your review and action dates. This risk assessment list should also be linked within your Legal Register. In short, one of the most effective ways to show and evaluate compliance is to ensure that all relevant evidence is linked or attached in some way to a Legal Register or Register of Compliance Obligations. These evidence documents should be active and hold a record of previous actions and any planned upcoming actions. You could also schedule regular inspections of your legal compliance, to evaluate your level of compliance against different requirements on an on-going basis. The resulting reports can also be linked within the Legal Register. Don't just rely on Internal Audits to cover your legal compliance evaluation. Utilise dedicated legal compliance inspections, link all relevant evidence within your legal register and have on-going reviews and updates throughout the year.   If you'd like any assistance with implementing ISO standards, get in touch with us, we'd be happy to help! We'd love to hear your views and comments about the ISO Show, here's how: ●     Share the ISO Show on Twitter or Linkedin ●     Leave an honest review on iTunes or Soundcloud. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. Subscribe to keep up-to-date with our latest episodes: Stitcher | Spotify | YouTube |iTunes | Soundcloud | Mailing List

The IRS has a lot of rules. One of their most important rules are their timelines. Timelines are unfair, but why? Do you have tax debt? Call us at 866-8000-TAX or fill out the form at https://choicetaxrelief.com/If you want to see more…-YouTube:    / @loganallec  -Instagram: @ChoiceTaxRelief @LoganAllec -TikTok: @loganallec-Facebook: Choice Tax Relief // Logan Allec, CPA -Reddit:   / taxrelief   

In this episode of the Consumer Finance Monitor podcast, host Alan Kaplinsky welcomes Pat Utz, CEO and co-founder of Abstract, a venture capital-backed AI company headquartered in New York. Pat brings extensive expertise on artificial intelligence. The podcast focuses on current developments in AI regulation and implementation, first covering President Trump's recent "Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan" and its potential impact on federal policy. Alan and Pat discuss the evolving landscape of AI statutes, and developments at the state-level in places like Utah and Colorado. Pat and Alan Kaplinsky provide insights into bipartisan efforts at both state and federal levels to address issues ranging from consumer safety to business innovation. They highlight the practical challenges and opportunities for businesses leveraging AI, such as the need for transparency when AI is used in customer interactions and compliance with state-level enforcement. Pat explains how open-source models are increasingly being promoted, pointing to Trump's executive order and shifts in the industry. He also underscores the importance for businesses to track where data is processed—whether with major vendors or proprietary systems—and adapt to varying regulatory frameworks, notably those set by states like California that tend to influence national practice. The episode concludes by focusing on the wide array of AI usage in financial services, specifically credit scoring and underwriting; lending; and fraud detection. Pat provides key lessons institutions should be mindful of as AI adoption continues to grow in the industry Consumer Finance Monitor is hosted by Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel at Ballard Spahr, and the founder and former chair of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group. We encourage listeners to subscribe to the podcast on their preferred platform for weekly insights into developments in the consumer finance industry.

This message was inspired by the passing of Charlie Kirk. I don't believe he was truly a racist in real life — I met him, spent time with him, and saw another side. But his last posts online give the opposite impression. That reality made me reflect:

In this enlightening episode, we delve into the intricacies of statutes of limitation and repose, unraveling their significance in the legal landscape. Discover how these legal timeframes impact both plaintiffs and defendants, and why understanding them is crucial for navigating the justice system effectively. Join us as we explore real-world examples and expert insights to shed light on these often misunderstood legal concepts.Imagine you're involved in a legal dispute, and just when you think you're ready to take action, you find out that time has run out. This is where the concepts of statutes of limitation and repose come into play. These legal timeframes can make or break a case, and understanding them is essential for anyone navigating the legal system.Understanding Statutes of Limitation: Statutes of limitation set the maximum time after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated. As legal expert Jane Doe explains, "These statutes are designed to ensure fairness by preventing the indefinite threat of a lawsuit." They vary by jurisdiction and type of claim, so it's crucial to know the specific limitations that apply to your case.The Role of Statutes of Repose: While similar to statutes of limitation, statutes of repose serve a different purpose. They provide a final deadline for filing a lawsuit, regardless of when the harm was discovered. John Smith, a seasoned attorney, notes, "Statutes of repose are about providing certainty and finality, especially in industries like construction and manufacturing."Real-World Implications: Consider a scenario where a construction defect is discovered years after a building is completed. The statute of repose may bar any legal action, even if the defect was hidden. This highlights the importance of understanding these legal timeframes and seeking timely legal advice.Navigating the complexities of statutes of limitation and repose can be daunting, but it's a critical aspect of legal strategy. By understanding these concepts, individuals and businesses can better protect their rights and make informed decisions. Subscribe now to stay informed about more legal insights and updates.TakeawaysStatutes of limitation are essential for fairness and efficiency in law.The discovery rule allows for fairness in cases of hidden injuries.Civil statutes of limitation apply to various types of claims, including torts and contracts.Breach of contract claims have specific limitation periods that must be adhered to.Medical malpractice cases often involve complex interactions between statutes of limitation and repose.Criminal law has its own set of statutes of limitation that protect defendants' rights.Certain serious crimes have no statute of limitations, reflecting societal interests in justice.Tolling provisions can pause the statute of limitations under specific circumstances.Continuing violations can reset the limitation period for ongoing wrongs.Understanding these legal timeframes is crucial for effective client representation.statutes of limitation, statutes of repose, legal doctrines, discovery rule, civil law, criminal law, medical malpractice, breach of contract, tolling provisions, legal strategy

This is the fourth devotional study in our series about the Bible principles for interpersonal relations between men and women -- especially husbands and wives.  This week, we will look at the book of Hosea, where the prophet Hosea has been called to go and marry (and later redeem) an adulterous prostitute for a wife.Hosea 1:2 KJVThe beginning of the word of the LORD by Hosea. And the LORD said to Hosea, “Go, take unto thee a wife of whoredoms and children of whoredoms: for the land hath committed great whoredom, departing from the LORD.”Related Podcasts:— God's Perspective on Gender Roles— Male/Female Dynamics, Part 1— Male/Female Dynamics, Part 2— Male/Female Dynamics, Part 3— The Weaker Vessel— Every Wise WomanRelated Podcasts at TrueWisdom:— A Woman of Action— True Valor— In the Beginning— The Bride of ChristText UsSupport the showSend questions or comments to: BibleQuestions@ASBzone.comThe Key Principles of Effective Bible Study is a resource which outlines core concepts shown in the Scriptures that will help you to better understand many Biblical themes and doctrines. We have a whole podcast series on these principles at BibleStudy.ASBzone.com/357512/8572886.God's Precious Word is a condensed, 9-part series based on the same resource. Check out these awesome Bible Maps! Lastly, we recommend that you check out https://TrueWisdom.buzzsprout.com for a related Bible Study podcast, in a different format, co-hosted with Robert Baker.We pray that all of these resources will be very helpful to you in your Bible Studies.

In the world of real estate, understanding the nuances of property recording acts is crucial. Imagine purchasing a dream home only to discover a hidden lien. This scenario underscores the importance of these acts, which ensure transparency and protect property rights.The Basics of Recording Acts: Recording acts are laws that govern the registration of property documents. They serve as a public record, providing notice of ownership and any claims against a property. This system helps prevent fraud and disputes by ensuring that all parties have access to the same information.Types of Recording Acts:Race Statutes: The first party to record their interest wins, regardless of notice. Notice Statutes: Protects a subsequent purchaser who buys without notice of a prior claim. Race-Notice Statutes: Requires a purchaser to record first and be without notice of prior claims to prevail.Why They Matter: Understanding these acts is vital for anyone involved in real estate transactions. They provide a legal framework that protects buyers, sellers, and lenders, ensuring that property rights are clear and enforceable.Navigating the complexities of real property recording acts can be daunting, but it's essential for safeguarding your investments. Stay informed and consult with legal professionals to ensure your property transactions are secure.TakeawaysReal property recording acts are essential for understanding ownership.Historical context reveals the chaos before recording acts.Recording acts serve multiple functions, including notice and priority.Different jurisdictions follow different types of recording statutes.Bona fide purchasers are crucial in determining property rights.Hypotheticals illustrate the application of recording acts.Chain of title issues can complicate property transactions.Title insurance protects against past defects in ownership.Prompt recording of deeds is vital for legal protection.Future technologies may reshape property law practices.Subscribe Now: Stay updated with the latest insights in real estate law by subscribing.property law, recording acts, real estate, bona fide purchaser, title insurance, legal education, property transactions, chain of title, legal analysis, real property

In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, Chris Willis and Louis Manetti delve into the evolving legal landscape surrounding the statute of limitations for mortgage foreclosures in Illinois. With recent cases challenging long-held assumptions, lenders face new uncertainties. This discussion provides insights into how these cases could set binding precedents, potentially altering foreclosure practices statewide. Tune in to understand the implications for lenders and servicers and learn strategies to navigate these legal challenges effectively.

Don't forget to hit the bell icon on Spotify, Show us your support - UPI ID: phanitej18@okiciciFor more such interesting content follow us on Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/msktelugupodcast/

This is the third devotional study in our series about the Bible principles for interpersonal relations between men and women -- especially husbands and wives.  This week, we will find some of these principles in the story of Zelophehad's daughters, as reported in Numbers 27.Numbers 27:4-5 KJVWhy should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us therefore a possession among the brethren of our father. And Moses brought their cause before the LORD.Related Podcasts:— God's Perspective on Gender Roles— Male/Female Dynamics, Part 1— Male/Female Dynamics, Part 2— The Weaker Vessel— Every Wise WomanRelated Podcasts at TrueWisdom:— A Woman of Action— True Valor— In the Beginning— The Bride of ChristText UsSupport the showSend questions or comments to: BibleQuestions@ASBzone.comThe Key Principles of Effective Bible Study is a resource which outlines core concepts shown in the Scriptures that will help you to better understand many Biblical themes and doctrines. We have a whole podcast series on these principles at BibleStudy.ASBzone.com/357512/8572886.God's Precious Word is a condensed, 9-part series based on the same resource. Check out these awesome Bible Maps! Lastly, we recommend that you check out https://TrueWisdom.buzzsprout.com for a related Bible Study podcast, in a different format, co-hosted with Robert Baker.We pray that all of these resources will be very helpful to you in your Bible Studies.

В данном подкасте мы обсудим как часто бывают налоговые аудиты, какие налоговые аудиты проводит CRA, что такое net worth audit и многое другое. Обсуждаемые вопросы: 1) С какого дня начинается отсчет срока давности для CRA 2) В каком случае CRA может проверить за 20 и более лет 3) Statute-barred, что это и когда это может помочь 4) Как происходит процесс споров с налоговой 5) Как часто делают аудиты на 10 лет и более лет 6) Популярный вид проверок 7) Что повышает риски такого аудита 8) Как выбирают на аудит 9) К каким аккаунтам и магазинам имеет доступ CRA Линк net_worth_assessment Александра Ильчук — налоговый адвокат, юрист по налоговым спорам в Канаде, член коллегии адвокатов Онтарио (Law Society of Ontario). Специализируется на работе с Канадским налоговым управлением (CRA): от налоговых проверок и апелляций до судебных разбирательств в судах (Налоговый суд, Федеральный суд) Канады. В своей практике она сочетает юридическую точность с практическими стратегиями защиты клиентов. Александра также активно выступает на конференциях Canadian Tax Foundation, Ontario Bar Association, а её статьи посвящены вопросам налоговой политики и администрирования. Alexandra Ilchuk, Associate Advotax Law Professional Corporation Tel: +1 437.916.9000, Email: ask@advotaxlaw.ca (далее…) ————————————————- The content of this site and our podcasts are for information only. Everybody's financial situation is different and the thoughts we provide here may not be applicable to you. We can't be held responsible for the consequences if you pursue an unsuitable course of action. Сообщение Налоговые аудиты в Канаде | 305 появились сначала на Moneyinside.ca-самый популярный финансовый подкаст в Канаде!.

Don't forget to hit the bell icon on Spotify, Show us your support - UPI ID: phanitej18@okiciciFor more such interesting content follow us on Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/msktelugupodcast/

Brandon Cox, newly accomplished mountaineer and soon-to-be best-selling author, sits down with the boys for a two-on-one chat about his unforgettable trek through northeastern Tanzania and his climb to the summit of Mount Kilimanjaro. It's a fascinating journey through a world of monkeys, five different climate zones, culminating with Brandon's tell all book It Goes With You releasing October 2025. Great Law. Less Legal. Law Done Lite!

"The IRS can go back over 20 years in certain instances for unfiled returns. We're not making this stuff up,” warns Virginia La Torre Jeker, a seasoned US international tax attorney with over 40 years of experience and returning guest to the show. Virginia is a member of the New York Bar, specializing in all aspects of international tax and cross-border transactions. In this week's Ask An Expert, host and founder of Plan First Wealth Richard Taylor talks to Virginia about the best ways to navigate the complexities of US taxation for expats. Do you know what it means for a tax return to be ‘open'? If you don't, you should. You'll learn about: Tax statutes of limitations and their implications on cross-border taxpayers. The consequences of missing forms and how it may leave tax returns perpetually open for IRS examination. Denaturalization and its potential tax implications. The importance of accurately filing foreign information returns and how failing to do so can result in penalties. Virginia and Richard stress the importance of informed decision-making in tax filings. Whether you're an expat, an immigrant to the US, or assisting international families, this episode is a fundamental listen to help you thrive financially and secure your retirement. We're the Brits in America is affiliated with Plan First Wealth LLC, an SEC registered investment advisor. The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of Plan First Wealth. Information presented is for educational purposes only and does not intend to make an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any specific securities, investments, or investment strategies. Investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed. Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial adviser and/or tax professional before implementing any strategy discussed herein. Plan First Wealth does not provide any tax and/or legal advice and strongly recommends that listeners seek their own advice in these areas.

Have you noticed how the pleasures of life are fading away? Music, movies, celebrations, even simple joys—things that once brought us happiness now feel empty. Creativity is gone, joy is disappearing, and entertainment feels like a burden instead of a blessing.This isn't just coincidence—it's Bible prophecy unfolding before our very eyes. The Book of Enoch, Isaiah, Ecclesiastes, and many other scriptures foretold a time when “all the pleasures of life will vanish” and “the daughters of music shall be brought low.”

Too often, we only hear about the curses of God's Laws. Yes, our people have suffered under those curses, but that's not the whole story. The Word of God promises that if we keep His statutes, commandments, and judgments, we will prosper in all that we do — not just in the Kingdom to come, but today.In this message, I share my personal testimony of how seeking God has brought me success, health, strength, and peace — and how turning away from Him brought the opposite. The Bible declares:“Keep the charge of the LORD thy God, to walk in his ways… that thou mayest prosper in all that thou doest, and whithersoever thou turnest thyself.” – 1 Kings 2:3 (KJV)God's Laws were given to us not just to warn us of curses but to usher us into blessings:Deuteronomy 28:1-3 – Obedience brings blessings in the city and in the country.Judith 5:21 – If there is no iniquity in us, our God will defend us.Joshua 1:8 – Meditating on His Law leads to good success.This is not just about ancient Israel — this is about you, today. Your wealth, your health, your strength, and your success all come from the Lord. His Laws were meant to make you prosper and keep you in perfect health.

I just turned 40 years old — a milestone I never dreamed I'd see. Growing up in the hood, surviving war in Iraq, burying friends and family, sleeping in my car, battling depression, and even staring down death itself — I shouldn't be here. But by God's grace… I'm still here.And if you're reading this, then you're still here too — and that means God still has a plan for you.

Unleashing Purpose and Prosperity with Pushkar Anand In this compelling episode, I sit down with Pushkar Anand, a transformational leader whose 15-year journey from high-achieving banker to purpose-driven author is nothing short of extraordinary. What began as a quest for personal success evolved into a mission to uplift humanity and empower others to unlock their highest potential. From Success-Seeker to Soul-Driven Leader Pushkar shares his evolution—rooted in voracious learning, with over 500 books read, countless seminars attended, and deep mentorship. His goal shifted from decoding the formula for success to creating a roadmap for others, helping them accelerate their growth without the long detour. His book is the result: a guide for those ready to step into their truth, purpose, and power. Authenticity as the Gateway to Purpose We dive into the heart of living authentically—what it really means to embody who you're meant to be. Pushkar's core belief is that once you're aligned with your true self, abundance naturally follows. I add that living with purpose makes us more resilient, magnetic, and inspiring. The answers we seek aren't “out there”—they live within us. Vibrational Alignment and Financial Freedom Pushkar breaks down how aligning your self-image with your financial vision can unlock exponential results. It's not just about goal-setting—it's about becoming the person who already has what they desire. By embracing “inspired action,” we can shift from hustle to harmony, planting seeds today for the wealth of tomorrow. The Power of Belief and Wealth Consciousness We unpack the deep power of self-belief, the rarity of human existence, and how our internal dialogue shapes our external reality. Pushkar introduces his “6 Statutes of Money,” challenging the myth that wealth is dependent on family background or formal education. The real key? Vibrational alignment and mindset mastery. Mastering Wealth Through Inner Work Pushkar explains that wealth isn't just earned—it's tuned into. Financial success is the byproduct of purpose, belief, and inner alignment. One of his key principles: there's no universal definition of “wealth”—it's as unique as each person's mission. Rewiring the subconscious can shift everything. A Book That Shifts Paradigms We close the conversation by exploring the impact of Pushkar's book—crafted to serve those ready to evolve. Whether you're starting your journey or looking to deepen your alignment with purpose and prosperity, Pushkar invites listeners to explore more through his site: PushkarAnandsWorld.com, where you'll find free resources, transformational programs, and tools to master your wealth from the inside out.  Pushkar Anand is the author of the #1 international bestseller Manifest Your Infinite Riches and founder of the Centre for Infinite Riches. Educated at the University of Cambridge and the London School of Economics, Pushkar was in the early stages of his traditional corporate career when a profound moment of insight in 2008 led him to evaluate his life expectations and priorities. This moment of insight set Pushkar on his quest as a seeker: an extraordinary quest of endless research and self-discovery that covered more than 500 books, thirty seminars, workshops and immersive learning experiences, and an intense four-year period of study with his teacher – Blaine Bartlett, whom he fondly addresses as Grandmaster B². Pushkar's fifteen-year journey resulted in his founding the Centre for Infinite Riches and authoring Manifest Your Infinite Riches. The Centre is best defined as a movement; a movement, whose purpose is to Uplift Humanity by empowering everyone it touches to become the person they were always meant to be. The Centre's vision is to uplift four million people by Pushkar's 50th birthday on October 21, 2026 and 100 million people by Grandmaster B²'s 80th birthday on September 9, 2026. https://pushkaranandsworld.com/about/ Book:  Manifest Your Infinite Riches

Clark Fredericks spent 5 years in prison for killing the man who abused him as a child. Now free, he shares his story to raise awareness about healing and freeing yourself from trauma.#crime #podcast #story Clark's Links:Book: https://www.amazon.com/Scarred-Memoir-Childhood-Stolen-Reclaimed/dp/1668018659Clark's Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/@clarkfredericks3309IG: @clarkfredericksShow Sponsors:Get rid of your khakis and get The Perfect Jean 15% off with code DALTON15 at theperfectjean.nyc/DALTON1500:00 | Intro03:21 | Childhood10:43 | Abuser Dennis Pegg12:31 | Start of Grooming Process19:06 | Specific Grooming Tactics & Psychology28:03 | Abuse #1 34:13 | Abuse #2 57:14 | I Hated Myself01:10:32 | Gambling Addiction01:24:00 | Getting Into a Life Threatening Debt With The Mob01:40:36 | Depression01:45:54 | Triggered By Seeing Dennis in Deli With Young Boy01:56:47 | Confronting Dennis02:03:13 | Violent Confrontation 02:11:48 | Getting Arrested02:38:55 | Sentencing02:40:57 | Prison02:48:26 | How to Control Your Thoughts03:07:50 | Getting Out of Prison03:08:34 | Advocating for Change in Statute of Limitations Law03:18:10 | Do You Have to Forgive to Heal?03:30:18 | Final Message

Welcome to another month of M&M Hour with Mandy and Melissa Reich! Mandy and Melissa get into the Real Housewives of Atlanta reunion part 2 and explain why they've been side eyeing Shamea before discussing the current drama on the Valley and this week's Real Housewives of Orange County. For all things Your Bish Therapist: Link Treelinktr.ee/yourbishtherapistFollow Melissa on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/yourbishtherapist/Follow Mandy on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mandyslutsker/

Tulsi Gabbard just dropped a truth bomb—exposing key players behind the Russia collusion hoax, and once again confirming what we've known all along: this was a coordinated political attack on President Trump, orchestrated at the highest levels. Barack Obama, John Brennan, James Clapper, and other Deep State elites weaponized our intelligence community to sabotage an incoming president. And yet—no one has been held accountable. Grant Stinchfield is furious. There is no statute of limitations for treason, but where is the Republican backbone to pursue real justice? Why won’t our so-called “leaders” in Congress dare to bring charges against the architects of the greatest political scandal in modern U.S. history? On this episode of Stinchfield, we call out the cowardice, expose the cover-up, and demand real consequences. The American people deserve justice. Anything less is surrender to tyranny. This isn’t just about the past—it’s about whether our Republic survives the next coup. Go to http://freegoldguide.com/grant or call 800 458 7356 for your free Colonial Metals Group retirement protection kit – created specifically for our listeners where you can get up to $7500 in free Silver. www.EnergizedHealth.com/Grant www.PatriotMobile.com/Grantwww.Get20Now.comTWC.Health/Grant Use "Grant" for 10% Off See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This weekend Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, released hundreds of documents she says are evidence that a huge numbers of Democrat officials—including President Barack Obama—engaged in treason and seditious conspiracy against President Donald Trump.  Gabbard also says that she has referred the matter to the Department of Justice and Attorney General Pam Bondi for federal prosecution.The crime of treason carries a potential death penalty, and the crime of seditious conspiracy carries a sentence of 20 years in a federal penitentiary. DNI documents: https://tinyurl.com/yhfzy6e6Interesting, most of the response to these allegations by Gabbard are not denials of the misconduct.  Indeed, the Progressive Fascist Left appears to have largely conceded the legal merits of the accusations. Instead, the Progressive Fascist Left is resorting to a variety of legal and political deflections and misdirection in an effort to wave away the apparently incontrovertible allegations of treason and seditious conspiracy. There are at least four main avenues of legal and political deflections being used by the Progressive Fascist Left against these credible allegations of treason and seditious conspiracy. First, and the only one that even carries even the stench of a denial is that doesn't everybody know that it was actually proven that Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election, and therefore the claims to that effect by Obama and other co-conspirators were simply truths, not treason or sedition?Then we get to the non-denial deflections.Second, that even if Obama engaged in treason and seditious conspiracy, he has presidential immunity against any such charges.Third, that even if Obama and others engaged in treason and seditious conspiracy, the standard federal crimes 5-year statute of limitations has already expired on these alleged offenses. Fourth, that even if Obama and others engaged in treason and seditious conspiracy, all this is merely political theater to distract from the “Epstein files” kerfuffle, it doesn't matter because the Trump DOJ won't dare arrest or prosecute anybody, so this is all pointless.Each of these four avenues of attack on Gabbard's claims and document release are demonstrably 100% false—with the possible exception of the last argument about this being merely political theater, which may be half true—but that will be a matter within the control of Donald Trump.The #1 guide for understanding when using force to protect yourself is legal. Now yours for FREE! Just pay the S&H for us to get it to you.➡️ Carry with confidence, knowing you are protected from predators AND predatory prosecutors➡️ Correct the common myths you may think are true but get people in trouble​➡️ Know you're getting the best with this abridged version of our best-selling 5-star Amazon-rated book that has been praised by many (including self-defense legends!) for its easy, entertaining, and informative style.​➡️ Many interesting, if sometimes heart-wrenching, true-life examplesGet Your Free Book: https://lawofselfdefense.com/getthebook

Send us a textIn this message, On the Road to Refuel: God's Word is our Fuel, Minister Samson reminds us that God's Word is more than spiritual food—it's daily fuel for our journey. Drawing from scriptures like Matthew 4:4 and Psalm 119:105, he unpacks how the Word sustains, reveals, and equips us. Just like a car's dashboard alerts us to areas needing attention, God's Word exposes what's running low in our lives—mentally, emotionally, spiritually, and more. It doesn't just fill us up; it gets to the heart of what's going on and prepares us to respond with power. The Word of God is our fuel, our guide, and our defense. THIS WEEK'S BIG DISCOVERY The Word of God doesn't just fill me, it fuels me, searches me, and equips me for what's next. Matthew 4:4The Word of God as bread:The Word is not optional; it's essential daily spiritual nutritionYesterday's meal doesn't always sustain today's hunger (or need)The Word fuels our faith and builds trust in God's sustaining powerPsalm 119:105God's Word reveals what needs refueling and how to keep moving forwardEphesians 6:17When the Word of God refuels and reveals, it also equips you to respond - check your gauges!THIS WEEK'S DEVELOPMENTTake the Psalm 119 Challenge - explore the 8 Hebrew words used for God's Word. Look up one each day this week and reflect on what it reveals about how God speaks to you. (Law, Word, Judgements, Testimonies, Commandments, Statutes, Precepts and Promises)Identify one gauge in your life that needs attention and invite God's Word to speak directly to it. Joins us on Sundays! Our 9:15am worship experience takes place in-person only while our 11:15am is both in-person and online (via the DLC App & YouTube). Connect with us! https://www.discoverlifega.org Instagram & Facebook @ discoverlifega

Download the notes here:https://esm.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Congregational-Notes-07.05.25.pdf____________________________________Website: esm.usPastor Mark BiltzMission Statement: (https://esm.us/about/)El Shaddai Ministries exists to take Torah to the nations by restoring the Biblical and historical perspectives that have been lost over the last 2000 years, uncovering replacement theology, and healing our Christian-Jewish relationships.Statement of Beliefs:https://tinyurl.com/4ks6eznu

In 1710, the British Parliament passed a piece of legislation entitled An Act for the Encouragement of Learning. It became known as the Statute of Anne, and it was the world's first copyright law. Copyright protects and regulates a piece of work - whether that's a book, a painting, a piece of music or a software programme. It emerged as a way of balancing the interests of authors, artists, publishers, and the public in the context of evolving technologies and the rise of mechanical reproduction. Writers and artists such as Alexander Pope, William Hogarth and Charles Dickens became involved in heated debates about ownership and originality that continue to this day - especially with the emergence of artificial intelligence. With:Lionel Bently, Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law at the University of CambridgeWill Slauter, Professor of History at Sorbonne University, ParisKatie McGettigan, Senior Lecturer in American Literature at Royal Holloway, University of London. Producer: Eliane GlaserReading list:Isabella Alexander, Copyright Law and the Public Interest in the Nineteenth Century (Hart Publishing, 2010)Isabella Alexander and H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui (eds), Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016)David Bellos and Alexandre Montagu, Who Owns this Sentence? A History of Copyrights and Wrongs (Mountain Leopard Press, 2024)Oren Bracha, Owning Ideas: The Intellectual Origins of American Intellectual Property, 1790-1909 (Cambridge University Press, 2016)Elena Cooper, Art and Modern Copyright: The Contested Image (Cambridge University Press, 2018)Ronan Deazley, On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eighteenth Century Britain, 1695–1775 (Hart Publishing, 2004)Ronan Deazley, Rethinking Copyright: History, Theory, Language (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006)Ronan Deazley, Martin Kretschmer and Lionel Bently (eds.), Privilege and Property: Essays on the History of Copyright (Open Book Publishers, 2010)Marie-Stéphanie Delamaire and Will Slauter (eds.), Circulation and Control: Artistic Culture and Intellectual Property in the Nineteenth Century (Open Book Publishers, 2021) Melissa Homestead, American Women Authors and Literary Property, 1822-1869 (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Adrian Johns, Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates (University of Chicago Press, 2009)Meredith L. McGill, American Literature and the Culture of Reprinting, 1834-1853 (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002)Mark Rose, Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright (Harvard University Press, 1993)Mark Rose, Authors in Court: Scenes from the Theater of Copyright (Harvard University Press, 2018)Catherine Seville, Internationalisation of Copyright: Books, Buccaneers and the Black Flag in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 2006)Brad Sherman and Lionel Bently, The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law (Cambridge University Press, 1999)Will Slauter, Who Owns the News? A History of Copyright (Stanford University Press, 2019)Robert Spoo, Without Copyrights: Piracy, Publishing and the Public Domain (Oxford University Press, 2013)In Our Time is a BBC Studios Audio production

Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:17532056201798502,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-9437-3289"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");pt> Click On Picture To See Larger Picture British PM is now betraying the country, he is making huge concessions with the European Union, his days are numbered. China cuts the interest rate, the Fed is still in a holding pattern, see what is happening. D's lost the rich are getting the tax cut narrative. Investors are buying gold funds. The [DS]/fake news  is now trying to pivot away from Biden. The problem is they do not have the narrative and the people are now asking a lot of questions of who was really running the country. Kash Patel and Dan Bongino are putting a information to smoke the sleepers out. Scavino in the last couple of days has pushed the military is the only way, why? Think statute of limitations, under civil law most are 5 years, under military most are unlimited.   Economy Leftist British PM Keir Starmer BETRAYS Brexit, Causes Alarm by Signing Agreement With European Union Making HUGE Concessions   Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, has just betrayed Brexit – and may have dealt a death blow to the island's fishing industry. There's widespread alarm over the terms of the ‘reset' deal with the European Union and the huge concessions that he made. At a press conference alongside European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, Keir Starmer says he is ‘moving on' from ‘Brexit battles', and that this deal will put Britain ‘back on the world stage'. Daily Mail reported: https://twitter.com/NicholasLissack/status/1924372295377662009?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1924372295377662009%7Ctwgr%5E7c2d31a35626b522c5601d813473a16e3f834205%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fleftist-british-pm-keir-starmer-betrays-brexit-causes%2F (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:18510697282300316,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-8599-9832"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); https://twitter.com/darrengrimes_/status/1924436308941791427?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1924436308941791427%7Ctwgr%5E7c2d31a35626b522c5601d813473a16e3f834205%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fleftist-british-pm-keir-starmer-betrays-brexit-causes%2F  Source: thegatewaypundit.com China cuts key lending rates to record lows to counter the impact of US tariffs China's central bank has cut its key lending rates to record lows to bolster the economy and cushion the impact of escalating trade tensions with the United States. The move follows a sweeping stimulus package announced earlier this month. The People's Bank of China (PBOC) has lowered its benchmark lending rates for the first time in seven months as part of ongoing efforts to mitigate the impact of US tariffs on its economy. The central bank cut the 1-year and 5-year loan prime rates (LPR) by 10 basis points to 3.0% and 3.5%, Source:  euronews.com  US Federal Reserve officials signal rates likely to stay on hold until at least September The central bank's next three meetings are in June, July and September https://twitter.com/MarketsDotNews/status/1924709190376820961 https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1924818332550639622   https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1924816670285054349 Trump tax bill will expire on December 31, 2025. and taxes will go up No,