Podcasts about Circ

This Day in Legal History: Plessy v. FergusonOn May 18, 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Plessy v. Ferguson, a case that became one of the most infamous constitutional decisions in American history. The dispute arose from a Louisiana law requiring separate railroad cars for Black and white passengers. Homer Plessy, who was of mixed race, deliberately sat in a whites-only rail car to challenge the law. After he was arrested, Plessy argued that the statute violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Supreme Court rejected that argument and held that racial segregation did not violate the Constitution as long as the separate facilities were considered equal. This became known as the “separate but equal” doctrine.In practice, the doctrine gave legal cover to segregation across the South and helped support the broader Jim Crow system. The Court treated segregation as a matter of public policy rather than as a badge of racial inferiority imposed by law. Justice Henry Billings Brown wrote the majority opinion, reasoning that enforced separation did not necessarily imply inequality. Justice John Marshall Harlan dissented, warning that the Constitution should be color-blind and that the ruling would become as harmful as the Court's decision in Dred Scott. His dissent later became one of the most important statements in American civil-rights law. For nearly six decades, Plessy allowed governments to maintain racially separate schools, transportation, and public facilities.The decision was finally undermined in 1954, when the Supreme Court decided Brown v. Board of Education and rejected segregation in public education. Plessy remains a stark example of how constitutional interpretation can either protect civil rights or help entrench systems of inequality.A proposed class action filed in Washington federal court accuses Amazon of keeping money it allegedly collected from customers through prices inflated by now-invalidated Trump administration tariffs. The plaintiffs say Amazon could seek refunds from the federal government after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the tariffs, but has refused to do so because it wants to stay in President Trump's good graces. The lawsuit claims Amazon passed tariff costs on to shoppers, then failed to commit to returning that money even though other retailers have allegedly pursued refunds. The customers point to Amazon's abandoned plan to show tariff-related price increases on product pages as evidence that the company can identify both the tariff amounts and the consumers who paid them. They also claim Amazon backed away from that plan after criticism from the Trump administration and a call involving Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos.The complaint alleges violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, unjust enrichment, and money had and received. The plaintiffs say Amazon misled consumers by suggesting tariffs were not increasing prices, while allegedly raising prices on certain low-cost goods after the tariffs took effect. They also argue Amazon failed to tell customers it would not seek tariff refunds even if the tariffs were later found unlawful. The proposed class would include Amazon customers who paid tariff-related surcharges from February 4, 2025, through February 20, 2026. The suit estimates the class could include tens of millions of buyers and seeks to recover money the plaintiffs say belongs to consumers. Similar lawsuits have been filed against other major companies, including Nike, Sony, Nintendo, Costco, Temu, and FedEx.Amazon Skipped Tariff Refunds To Appease Trump, Suit Says - Law360The Federal Circuit held its biennial judicial conference in Washington, D.C., bringing together its active judges, agency leaders, district judges who have recently sat by designation, Chief Justice John Roberts, and Solicitor General D. John Sauer. Chief Judge Kimberly Ann Moore opened the event with lighter moments, including praise for Senior Judge Raymond C. Clevenger and the debut of an AI-generated Federal Circuit theme song meant to make the court feel more accessible. The conference did not address the ongoing suspension of Judge Pauline Newman, although she attended the event while continuing to challenge the suspension at the Supreme Court. Judge Moore said the court issued 630 opinions in 2025, its highest total in a decade, and noted an effort to use fewer one-line Rule 36 affirmances. Still, court leaders and practitioners criticized Rule 36 decisions, especially because they give lower courts and litigants little explanation.The judges also discussed en banc arguments, emphasizing that lawyers must stay focused because full-court arguments leave little time for extended exchanges with any one judge. A major theme was the renewed use of district judges sitting by designation, with 23 visiting judges helping decide nearly 200 cases since February 2024. Visiting district judges said the experience gave them a new appreciation for appellate work, the quality of Federal Circuit advocacy, and the process of narrowing trial records into appealable issues. Federal Circuit judges also described sitting on other courts, including in criminal sentencing matters, which several said gave them a deeper appreciation for the workload and human stakes faced by district judges. The judges offered practical advice to lawyers, urging them to narrow issues, address weaknesses directly, provide full context for citations, and make appropriate concessions. USPTO Director John Squires also appeared and defended his approach to discretionary denials of inter partes review petitions, saying he is returning the process to what Congress intended under the America Invents Act.Fed. Circ. Drops A Theme Song, Talks Guest Judges - Law360President Donald Trump has dropped his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS and Treasury Department, a move linked to discussions about creating a $1.8 billion compensation fund for people who claim they were unfairly investigated by prior administrations. The court filing did not describe any settlement, but Trump's lawyers said the case was still early enough that he could dismiss it without court permission or IRS approval.The dismissal was filed “with prejudice,” meaning Trump cannot bring the same claim again. Trump and his sons filed the lawsuit in January, accusing the IRS of failing to protect confidential tax information after his tax records were leaked. A former IRS contractor, Charles Littlejohn, was sentenced to prison for leaking Trump's tax information as well as records belonging to many others. Trump brought the case as a private citizen, not in his official role as president. The federal judge overseeing the case had already questioned whether a sitting president could properly seek personal monetary damages from an agency inside the executive branch.The dismissal follows settlements in lawsuits brought by Trump allies, including Michael Flynn and Carter Page. Shortly after Trump's filing, House Democrats submitted a brief accusing him of self-dealing and arguing that any attempt to use the court process to support a settlement should be closely reviewed.Trump drops lawsuit against IRS amid talks of establishing a $1.8 billion fund for allies | CNN Politics This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

coucou c'est descriptionou , ta description préférée ....ou pasallez un boulot :là où on retrouve tout galaxie pophttps://linktr.ee/galaxiepopmerci à Nostalichou , Circé, shaokun kun,ak dallas (hé un nouveau chroniqueur) Roland avec un seul L et surtout la divine sistizzzzzzet louloute et son zèbre psychopattes le lien recommandé par Circé :https://genstarwars.fr/generations-star-wars-et-sf-2026-15-000-fois-merci/ credit music :Stuff-farewellalbum complet ici :https://stuffteam.bandcamp.com/album/farewell la série reco de la semaine : evilhttps://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil_(s%C3%A9rie_t%C3%A9l%C3%A9vis%C3%A9e)

Entre ! Geek est un podcast de la galaxie savoureuse Galaxie Pop, rejoignez nous sur discordVous pouvez retrouver toutes nos productions sur notre linktree !Envie de nous laisser un petit message audio sur cette épisode : vous pouvez le faire à cette adresse ou directement pour le démontage de rotule sur le répondeur d'Entre ! Geek Aujourd'hui un épisode sans parole, enfin sans CausmicBeast ... histoire de faire le point...On regarde en arrière et on met des extraits sonores et musicaux en rapport avec la dernière année d'Entre ! Geek (d'où le titre de cet épisode

avec Circé Chelmi des Podcats Hyperdrive et Zone 52 Céline du Podcast Geek squadronhttps://geeksquadron.lepodcast.fr/ et Circé notre grande préteresse de la SF et tout ce beau monde à :https://genstarwars.fr/retrouvez le court métrage star tour last launchhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F1e9Em6YZY avec abdu qui a insufflé ce clip !!!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HvaFhUcm-4

WTiN speaks to Teresa Krug, chief product officer at US-based textile-to-textile recycling innovator, Circ.WTiN speaks to the leaders in textile manufacturing about the trends and advancements shaping the textile industry.In this episode, we are joined by Teresa Krug, chief product officer at Circ. Circ is a US-based textile-to-textile recycling innovator working towards building circular future for fashion. Krug speaks about Circ's advancements in mechanical recycling and how Circ unites brands with global suppliers to accelerate the adoption of textile-to-textile recycled materials. She also touches upon the challenges Circ is working to overcome in this space, and how she fosters a culture of continuous innovation and learning.Additionally, we touch upon the potential in cross industry collaboration when it comes to building a circular economy.You can learn more at circ.earth.

Le lien entre travail de nuit et cancer du sein est aujourd'hui sérieusement étudié… mais il reste complexe, nuancé, et parfois contre-intuitif.Tout part d'un constat biologique simple : notre corps fonctionne selon une horloge interne, appelée rythme circadien. Or, travailler la nuit perturbe profondément ce rythme. En particulier, l'exposition à la lumière nocturne diminue la production de mélatonine, une hormone du sommeil qui joue aussi un rôle protecteur contre certains cancers. C'est dans ce contexte qu'intervient la célèbre “Nurses' Health Study”, l'une des plus grandes études épidémiologiques jamais menées. Elle a suivi des dizaines de milliers d'infirmières pendant plusieurs décennies. Les résultats sont nuancés. Dans la première cohorte, les femmes ayant travaillé de nuit pendant plus de 30 ans ne présentaient pas d'augmentation significative du risque de cancer du sein. Mais dans une cohorte plus récente, appelée Nurses' Health Study II, une autre réalité apparaît : les femmes ayant travaillé de nuit pendant plus de 20 ans — surtout lorsqu'elles avaient commencé jeunes — présentaient un risque accru, parfois multiplié par deux. Comment expliquer cette différence ? Probablement par l'âge d'exposition. Le travail de nuit semble plus délétère lorsqu'il intervient tôt dans la vie, à un moment où les tissus mammaires sont plus sensibles aux perturbations hormonales.Au-delà de cette étude, l'ensemble des données scientifiques reste contrasté. Certaines recherches montrent une augmentation du risque, notamment chez les femmes ayant travaillé de nuit pendant de longues périodes ou à forte intensité. D'autres, au contraire, ne trouvent pas d'association claire. En résumé, le lien existe probablement… mais il est modéré, et dépend de nombreux facteurs : durée, fréquence, âge, hygiène de vie.Face à ces incertitudes, les autorités sanitaires ont pris une position prudente mais importante. En 2007, le Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (CIRC), dépendant de l'OMS, a classé le travail de nuit perturbant les rythmes biologiques comme « probablement cancérogène pour l'homme » (groupe 2A). Ce classement signifie qu'il existe des indices sérieux, sans preuve définitive.Alors, faut-il s'inquiéter ? Pas nécessairement. Le risque, s'il existe, reste relativement faible à l'échelle individuelle. Mais il devient significatif à l'échelle de populations entières, notamment chez les professions très exposées comme les infirmières.En conclusion, le travail de nuit n'est pas anodin. Il ne provoque pas directement un cancer, mais il pourrait, dans certaines conditions, augmenter légèrement le risque. C'est un bon exemple de ces facteurs invisibles qui, à long terme, influencent silencieusement notre santé. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Invitée: Circé Fuch, députée au Grand Conseil et conseillère communale de Bex. Manifestations: La coopérative brassicole de la Mine fête ses 10 ans cette année 2026  et Le comptoir du chablais à suivre du  21 au 23 août 2026.  Dicodeurs et dicodeuses: Marie Riley, Frédéric Gérard, Eric Constantin, Forma et Lord Betterave. Accompagné·e·s en musique par Sandrine Viglino. Réalisation: Jean-Pascal Mages.

Invitée: Circé Fuch, députée au Grand Conseil et conseillère communale de Bex. Manifestations: La coopérative brassicole de la Mine fête ses 10 ans cette année 2026  et Le comptoir du chablais à suivre du  21 au 23 août 2026.  Dicodeurs et dicodeuses: Marie Riley, Frédéric Gérard, Eric Constantin, Forma et Lord Betterave. Accompagné·e·s en musique par Sandrine Viglino. Réalisation: Jean-Pascal Mages.

Invitée: Circé Fuch, députée au Grand Conseil et conseillère communale de Bex. Manifestations: La coopérative brassicole de la Mine fête ses 10 ans cette année 2026  et Le comptoir du chablais à suivre du  21 au 23 août 2026.  Dicodeurs et dicodeuses: Marie Riley, Frédéric Gérard, Eric Constantin, Forma et Lord Betterave. Accompagné·e·s en musique par Sandrine Viglino. Réalisation: Jean-Pascal Mages.

Invitée: Circé Fuch, députée au Grand Conseil et conseillère communale de Bex. Manifestations: La coopérative brassicole de la Mine fête ses 10 ans cette année 2026  et Le comptoir du chablais à suivre du  21 au 23 août 2026.  Dicodeurs et dicodeuses: Marie Riley, Frédéric Gérard, Eric Constantin, Forma et Lord Betterave. Accompagné·e·s en musique par Sandrine Viglino. Réalisation: Jean-Pascal Mages.

Sara Silva passa pel Bacstage de Flaixbac per presentar "Prisionia", el nou espectacle del Circo de los Horrores, que es pot veure al Port Vell de Barcelona fins al 26 d'abril.

Invitée: Circé Fuch, députée au Grand Conseil et conseillère communale de Bex. Manifestations: La coopérative brassicole de la Mine fête ses 10 ans cette année 2026  et Le comptoir du chablais à suivre du  21 au 23 août 2026.  Dicodeurs et dicodeuses: Marie Riley, Frédéric Gérard, Eric Constantin, Forma et Lord Betterave. Accompagné·e·s en musique par Sandrine Viglino. Réalisation: Jean-Pascal Mages.

crédit musique tous droits réservés :dans le clip le chanteur ne se montre pas dans le beau rôlehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkUAm9GaMt8Gérard Blanc - Une autre histoire (Clip officiel) 2 eme au top 50 en 1987il nous a quitté en 2009 (17 ans avant la naissance de Nécrolland le nécrochroniqueur de la gazette de galaxie pop tous les dimanches)https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9rard_Blanc merci à marty et Gladou de leur confiance et amitié voilà c'était descriptionou ...oui votre amie la description de l'épisodepromis ! je ferais des efforts .mais bon quand on a pas des champions comme AK Dallas ,Circé ou encore Cosmique bestialc'est pas de la tartemerci à galaxie pop de nous permettre d'apporter un peu de lecture aux descriptionistas et descriptionistos .bon je te laisse je file à la piscine pour y faire des bulles avec mes pets .ben si j'suis comme ça . votre devouée descriptionou

This Day in Legal History: United States v. CruikshankOn March 27, 1876, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. Cruikshank, a ruling that exposed the Court's deep reluctance to enforce the promises of Reconstruction. The case arose from the Colfax Massacre, where dozens of Black citizens were murdered by white supremacists attempting to overturn a contested election. Federal prosecutors secured convictions under the Enforcement Act, aiming to protect Black citizens' constitutional rights in the face of organized racial violence. The Supreme Court, however, dismantled those convictions with striking indifference to the underlying atrocities.The Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment constrained only state action, not the conduct of private individuals, effectively shielding perpetrators of racial terror from federal accountability. It further ruled that rights such as assembly and bearing arms were not protected from state interference through the Constitution at that time. This narrow interpretation gutted federal enforcement power at precisely the moment it was most needed. The decision ignored the reality that state authorities in the South were often unwilling—or actively refusing—to protect Black citizens.Critically, the Court's reasoning elevated formal legal distinctions over the lived experience of widespread, systematic violence. By insisting on a rigid state-action requirement, the justices created a legal loophole large enough to permit organized terror campaigns to flourish unchecked. The ruling signaled to white supremacist groups that federal intervention would be weak or nonexistent. In doing so, it contributed directly to the collapse of Reconstruction-era protections and the rise of Jim Crow.The long-term consequences were profound, as Cruikshank became a cornerstone for limiting civil rights enforcement for decades. It delayed meaningful federal protection of individual rights until well into the twentieth century. Modern constitutional law has largely rejected its reasoning through incorporation doctrine, yet its impact remains a stark reminder of how judicial decisions can entrench injustice.A federal judge in California issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration from labeling Anthropica national security supply chain risk, finding the move was likely unconstitutional retaliation. The dispute arose after Anthropic pushed back during contract negotiations with the government, arguing it should be allowed to limit how its AI system Claude is used, particularly for mass domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons. Shortly after the company made its position public, the administration directed agencies to stop using its tools and moved to formally designate it as a security risk.Judge Rita F. Lin concluded that Anthropic is likely to succeed on its claims, emphasizing that the government appeared to be punishing the company for publicly criticizing its contracting stance. She found that the measures were not closely tied to genuine national security concerns and instead resembled retaliation for protected speech. The court stressed that while the government is free to choose its vendors, it cannot take additional punitive steps that violate constitutional protections.The ruling also found that the designation was likely unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act and potentially violated due process because Anthropic had no opportunity to respond. The judge noted that branding a company as a national security threat for expressing disagreement raises serious constitutional concerns. The injunction blocks enforcement of the directive and prevents further action against the company while the case proceeds.The decision highlights broader tensions between government control over AI use and private companies' efforts to impose ethical limits. It also underscores concerns that government retaliation could chill public debate about AI safety. The administration must now report back to the court on its compliance with the order.Anthropic Blocks Pentagon's ‘Orwellian' Security Risk Label - Law360US judge blocks Pentagon's Anthropic blacklisting for now | ReutersA lawyer for Elon Musk has asked a federal judge to review a jury verdict that found him liable for defrauding Twitter investors during his acquisition of the platform, now known as X. The request focuses in part on the jury's use of the number “$4.20” on the verdict form, which Musk's attorney argued was an intentional joke that showed bias and suggested the jury was trying to “send a message” rather than decide the case impartially.Musk's legal team claims this, along with other alleged trial issues, undermines the integrity of the verdict and warrants further judicial review by Judge Charles Breyer. The verdict, issued on March 20, found Musk liable for certain public statements he made about the prevalence of bots on the platform during the acquisition process, which investors argued harmed the company's stock price. Potential damages in the case could reach as high as $2.5 billion.Attorneys for the investors strongly rejected Musk's arguments, calling them baseless and accusing him of attacking the jury instead of accepting responsibility. They emphasized that the verdict followed substantial evidence presented at trial.The dispute stems from claims that Musk publicly criticized Twitter to renegotiate or exit the deal, ultimately affecting shareholders who sold at lower prices. While the jury found him liable for some statements, it did not conclude that he engaged in a broader scheme to defraud.Musk urges judge to review Twitter verdict, accuses jury of ‘mocking' him | ReutersThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit revived part of an ERISA class action against Wells Fargo and Ocwen Financial Corp., overturning a lower court decision that had dismissed the case before trial. The lawsuit was brought by trustees of a union pension fund, who claim the companies mishandled subprime mortgages tied to the fund's investments in mortgage-backed securities.The appellate court found that the trial judge made a key mistake in concluding that none of the underlying mortgages qualified as ERISA plan assets. While the court agreed that some mortgage-backed securities—specifically those structured as notes—are not plan assets, it ruled differently for securities issued as trust certificates. In those instances, the underlying mortgages can count as plan assets because the investment structure gives the pension fund an equity-like interest in the trust.This distinction matters because ERISA fiduciary duties apply only to plan assets. By recognizing that certain underlying mortgages fall within that definition, the court reopened the possibility that the companies could be held liable for breaching fiduciary duties. The pension fund alleges that the defendants mishandled loans during the 2007–2009 financial crisis, including pushing borrowers into foreclosure, which harmed the fund's investments.The court declined to decide whether Ocwen acted as an ERISA fiduciary, noting that the lower court had not addressed that issue. As a result, the case will return to the trial court for further proceedings on the revived claims.​​2nd Circ. Reopens Mortgage-Backed Securities ERISA Suit - Law360 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

This Day in Legal History: Poll TaxOn March 19, 1962, Congress approved a constitutional amendment to abolish the poll tax in federal elections, a practice that had long been used to suppress voter participation. The poll tax required citizens to pay a fee before casting a ballot, which disproportionately affected low-income individuals, especially African Americans in the South. By removing this financial barrier, Congress took a clear step toward expanding access to the democratic process. The amendment was later ratified as the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, cementing the principle that voting should not depend on one's ability to pay. This change reflected the growing influence of the civil rights movement, which pushed lawmakers to confront systemic inequality in voting laws. It also signaled a broader shift toward recognizing voting as a fundamental right rather than a conditional privilege.The legal reasoning behind abolishing the poll tax focused on fairness and equal protection, emphasizing that economic status should not determine political participation. Courts and lawmakers increasingly viewed such barriers as incompatible with democratic ideals. This moment in legal history continues to shape debates about what constitutes an undue burden on voters.Today, discussions around the SAVE Act, which proposes strict voter identification requirements, have raised similar questions about access and eligibility. Supporters argue that identification rules protect election integrity, despite there being no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Critics warn that they may disproportionately affect certain groups, including those with limited access to documentation. The comparison to the poll tax debate lies in how both policies raise concerns about whether procedural requirements might exclude eligible voters. While the mechanisms differ—one being a direct financial cost and the other an administrative requirement—the underlying legal tension remains similar. Lawmakers and courts must again weigh the balance between safeguarding elections and ensuring that access to voting remains broad and equitable.The Third Circuit heard arguments in a high-stakes appeal involving a $1.6 billion False Claims Act (FCA) verdict against Johnson & Johnson and broader challenges to the law's constitutionality. The FCA is a federal law that allows the government to pursue individuals or companies that defraud federal programs. It also lets private whistleblowers file lawsuits on the government's behalf and share in any financial recovery.Judges appeared reluctant to dismantle the FCA's whistleblower, or qui tam, mechanism, though they engaged seriously with arguments questioning its validity. Much of the discussion focused on whether private individuals wield too much power by bringing fraud claims on behalf of the government. An attorney for business groups argued that this structure improperly grants executive authority to non-government actors, while judges pushed back by pointing to the long historical use of such actions.A central issue in the case was “materiality,” meaning whether the alleged misconduct actually influenced the government's decision to pay claims. J&J argued there was no proof that its actions affected payment decisions, but the judges suggested that such determinations are typically left to juries. They also questioned whether J&J had properly preserved certain legal arguments for appeal. The Department of Justice disputed J&J's interpretation of its position, emphasizing that the evidence could still support liability under the FCA.The panel also examined the role of evidence and jury instructions, particularly how jurors were told to evaluate whether improper marketing led to false claims. J&J criticized the “substantial factor” standard used at trial, arguing it was unclear and insufficient. In response, the whistleblowers' counsel maintained that J&J was seeking a stricter standard than the law requires. Judges appeared to wrestle with whether the instructions properly guided the jury without overcomplicating the burden of proof.Overall, the arguments revealed judicial skepticism toward sweeping constitutional attacks on the FCA, alongside concern about how the specific trial was conducted. The case highlights ongoing legal debates over the balance between encouraging whistleblowers and ensuring fair limits on liability.Key Details As 3rd Circ. Ponders FCA's Fate, $1.6B J&J Fine - Law360Music company BMG has sued AI firm Anthropic, alleging it used copyrighted song lyrics from artists like Bruno Mars, the Rolling Stones, and Ariana Grande to train its Claude chatbot without permission. The lawsuit claims this involved copying hundreds of protected works, possibly sourced from unauthorized platforms, and seeks significant damages under U.S. copyright law.The case is part of a broader wave of lawsuits against AI companies over training data practices, including a similar ongoing suit by other music publishers and a prior $1.5 billion settlement Anthropic reached with authors. While BMG argues this use is unlawful infringement, AI companies like Anthropic maintain that training models on such material qualifies as fair use because it transforms the content.BMG sues Anthropic for using Bruno Mars, Rolling Stones lyrics in AI training | ReutersA Second Circuit judge sharply questioned OpenAI's position in a copyright dispute with Raw Story, expressing frustration that the company's lawyer could not explain whether its AI system copied articles or removed copyright management information (CMI). The judge suggested that this lack of clarity weakened OpenAI's argument, especially at an early stage without full discovery.OpenAI argued the case should be dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to show concrete harm or properly allege infringement, emphasizing that removing CMI alone does not violate a protected property right. The company also claimed the complaint relied too heavily on speculation rather than specific facts about how its systems operate. However, the judges appeared skeptical, noting that factual questions about copying and CMI removal might need further development.Raw Story countered that copying articles without CMI is itself a recognized legal injury and fits within longstanding copyright protections. The publishers also argued that OpenAI knowingly removed identifying information in a way that could enable infringement, which is prohibited under the DMCA. The panel ultimately took the case under advisement, leaving unresolved key questions about how copyright law applies to AI systems.2nd Circ. Judge Unimpressed By OpenAI's IP Suit Stance - Law360An immigration judge has ended the asylum claims of five-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his family after their detention during a large immigration operation in Minnesota. Liam and his father were taken into custody in January and held for about 10 days in a Texas facility before being released. Public attention grew after a widely shared image showed the child standing outside his home while federal agents were nearby.The ruling was issued by U.S. Immigration Judge John Burns, and the family's attorney has said they will appeal the decision, a process that could take a long time. Community members, including Liam's school district, expressed sadness and concern over the outcome while acknowledging that the legal process is ongoing.The case is tied to “Operation Metro Surge,” a large-scale enforcement effort that brought thousands of immigration agents to Minnesota. The operation led to widespread detentions and significant backlash, especially after two U.S. citizens were fatally shot during related protests or observations. The federal government later ended the operation, but local communities continue to deal with its emotional and economic effects.Advocates and officials have emphasized the broader human impact of the raid, particularly on children and families whose lives were disrupted. Liam's case has become a focal point in discussions about immigration enforcement and its consequences.Judge ends asylum claim of Minnesotan boy detained by ICE, report says | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

La canal central de Cambra d'Ase brillarà aquest vespre amb la llum de les torxes. Seran una trentena de professionals dels CRS rescats de muntanya, la gendarmeria d'alta muntanya, pisters i guies, que faran baixar les flames per aquesta pendent, creant un espectacle de llum que serà visible des del Pla de Cambra. L'estació ofereix avui un forfait de 5€ per pujar a partir de les 17h i anar a l'après-ski o esquiar una estona abans de veure aquesta baixada, que serà a les 19h. En acabat, el públic podrà agafar també una torxa i baixar esquiant fins a Eina o a Sant Pere dels Forcats. Galdric Bes, director de restauració de les estacions Trio Pyrénées

grâce aux mycéliades festival dans toute la France qui vient de se terminerhttps://myceliades.com/(pensez à regarder l'année prochaine les évènements )Circé et Dany ont pu assister avec plaisir à quelques jours du départ de Sophie Adenot pour 8 mois dans l'ISShttps://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Adenotà une projection du film Apollo 13https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_13et assister à une passionnante interaction du public nombreux et divers (on les entend peu mais nos sœurs étaient fort présentes)avec le spationaute Jean François Clervoyhttps://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Fran%C3%A7ois_Clervoy

This Day in Legal History: Powell v. AlabamaOn February 16, 1932, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Powell v. Alabama, a case that would become a cornerstone of modern criminal procedure. The appeal arose from the notorious Scottsboro Boys prosecutions in Alabama, where nine young Black men were accused of raping two white women aboard a train. The trials moved with alarming speed, and the defendants were sentenced to death after proceedings that offered little meaningful access to legal counsel. In some instances, lawyers were appointed on the day of trial, leaving virtually no time to prepare a defense.The case forced the Court to confront whether such rushed representation satisfied the requirements of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. When the decision was issued later that year, the Court held that in capital cases, state courts must provide defendants with effective assistance of counsel. The justices emphasized that the right to be heard would mean little without the guiding hand of an attorney. The ruling did not yet create a broad right to counsel in all felony cases, but it marked a significant expansion of constitutional protections in state criminal proceedings.Powell signaled that fundamental fairness in state trials was subject to federal constitutional scrutiny. It also laid important groundwork for later decisions that would extend the right to counsel beyond capital cases. The case remains a defining example of how procedural safeguards can shape the legitimacy of the criminal justice system.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revived part of Google's challenge to a Wildseed Mobile LLC patent covering the creation and transmission of “hot links” through text messages. A three-judge panel vacated a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that had upheld one remaining claim of the patent, while invalidating the others. The appellate court found that the board failed to properly analyze Google's argument that the claim was invalid in light of prior art.The disputed claim involved generating a hot link using either an SMS message or an instant message. Although Google addressed both aspects in its petition, the board focused only on the SMS portion and did not meaningfully address the instant messaging limitation. The Federal Circuit said the board neither evaluated whether prior art covered the instant messaging element nor explained why it declined to do so. Because of that omission, the panel sent the case back to the board for further review.Wildseed had accused Google of infringing the patent based on how advertisements function on YouTube. The lawsuit was initially filed in Texas in 2022 but later moved to federal court in California, where proceedings were paused pending the outcome of the PTAB review. In 2024, the board had already invalidated claims in two related Wildseed patents involving video ads and smartphone notifications.Google's Hot Link Patent Claim Challenge Revived At Fed. Circ. - Law360Federal prosecutors have unveiled additional details in a criminal case accusing Cleveland Guardians pitchers Emmanuel Clase and Luis Ortiz of participating in a pitch-fixing scheme tied to sports betting. A superseding indictment filed in New York alleges that Clase exchanged coded text messages with associates and bettors before games to signal when he would throw specific pitches. The messages reportedly used poultry-themed language such as “rooster” and “chicken” to disguise the scheme. In one example, an associate allegedly texted Clase about throwing a “rock at the first rooster,” to which Clase responded affirmatively.Prosecutors claim that bettors used this advance information to place successful proposition bets on pitch speed, winning hundreds of thousands of dollars. According to the indictment, bettors earned at least $400,000 on wagers involving Clase and about $60,000 on wagers involving Ortiz. The players allegedly agreed to accept bribes of at least $12,000 each. Authorities also allege that some coordination occurred in person, including meetings at Clase's home, and that payments were routed through intermediaries.The updated indictment adds Robinson Vasquez Germosen, who prosecutors say acted as a middleman and later lied to FBI agents about his knowledge of the scheme. He is charged with making false statements. Clase and Ortiz previously pleaded not guilty, and their attorneys maintain that the allegations are unproven and will be challenged at trial.MLB Pitcher Sent ‘Coded' Texts For Rigged Pitches, Feds Say - Law360 UKA long-running dispute over ownership of a goldendoodle named Tucker has concluded with a private sealed-bid auction ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery. The case, Callahan v. Nelson, involved former partners Karen Callahan and Joseph Nelson, who had jointly acquired the dog while dating but could not agree on ownership after their 2022 breakup. Because the couple was never married, they could not rely on Delaware's family law statute that allows courts to consider a pet's well-being when dividing marital property.After conflicting rulings in lower courts, the matter reached the state's premier business court, where Vice Chancellor Bonnie W. David applied a property “partition” remedy. Rather than ordering shared custody or considering the dog's best interests, the court required a single blind bidding process between the parties. The higher bidder would keep Tucker, and the other would receive the payment. The exact amount of the winning bid was not disclosed. Nelson ultimately submitted the top bid and retained the dog.The court explained that, absent statutory authority to weigh the animal's welfare, traditional property principles favored an auction as the cleanest solution. A neutral attorney oversaw the process and noted that the dog's value was subjective and personal, not easily tied to market measures. Callahan's attorney said she was disappointed but would not seek to block the result, adding that the case sets helpful precedent for resolving similar pet ownership disputes.A key legal element in the case is the use of partition, an equitable remedy typically applied when co-owners of property cannot agree on how to divide it. Instead of physically splitting the property or forcing continued joint ownership, the court may order a sale and distribute the proceeds.Ex-Boyfriend Wins Tucker the Goldendoodle in Sealed Bid Auction This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Entre ! Geek est un podcast de la galaxie savoureuse Galaxie Pop, rejoignez nous sur discord https://discord.gg/9VbAgcT2TwVous pouvez retrouver toutes nos productions à cette adresse https://linktr.ee/galaxiepop !Envie de nous laisser un petit mot audio sur cette épisode : vous pouvez le faire à cette adresse ou directement pour le démontage de rotule sur le propre répondeur d'Entre ! Geek Sans raison, j'ai eu envie de vous lire cette petite nouvelle de Roger Zelazny (oui y a pas que Richard Matheson dans la vie... wink wink wink).... d'ailleurs si vous aimez Richard Matheson (mais pas que !) vous pouvez aller écouter Pop Dimension, voyage dans la Quatrième galaxie Au programme de cette nouvelle de 1963...Les affres de la solitude de la Fée Circé, sur sa petite planète... elle aime les hommes... seulement, elle a un petit ... problème.Un jour, un homme arrive qui résiste à son petit ... problèmeComme pour "La sangsue Mécanique", cette nouvelle n'a connue qu'une seule et unique publication Musique d'introduction : Jessy Mach Ulysses-and-the-curse-of-the-godsMusique de conclusion : The Toxic Avenger 'Bad Girls Need Love Too"

Dive into the high-stakes evolution of quantum computing in this episode of the Cubit Value Podcast, where hosts break down the seismic shift from Google's Sycamore era to the powerhouse 105-qubit Willow processor. Recorded in early 2026, the discussion offers a masterclass in modernizing quantum workflows, covering everything from the necessity of Python 3.11 to the precision of new gate calibrations and the introduction of Quantum Echoes for advanced system verification. Whether you're navigating the "great divorce" of Circ and Qualtran or looking to harness bit-mask key conditions for real-time error decoding, this episode serves as an essential roadmap for engineers ready to transition from mere discovery to large-scale quantum engineering. Want to hear more? Send a message to Qubit Value

L'Odyssée de Circée numéro 23 : Le chant des glaces de Jean KrugLien vers le site internet de Jean Krug :https://www.jeankrug.fr/Lien vers le site du Geek Squadron des copines Céline et Eiris :https://geeksquadron.lepodcast.fr/Lien vers le site du festival Les Utopiales :https://www.utopiales.org/Lien vers le flux indépendant de l'Odyssée de Circé :https://lodysseedecirce.lepodcast.fr/ Lien vers le flux Galaxie Pop Nouveautés :https://galaxiepopnouveautes.lepodcast.fr/ Je remercie vivement les copains de Galaxie Pop pour le soutien et le support technique.Un immense merci à XP78 qui se démène pour dénicher des pépites pour illustrer mon propos.Venez discuter avec moi sur Bluesky, Threads et X Sources pour le montage :record-disc scratch sound effects : https://youtu.be/sy_Aje0hnacauto pilot not functional : https://www.trekcore.com/audio/computer/voice/autopilotnotfunctional.mp3Record Scratch Sound Effect – (Free Meme Sound) : https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4D7h5qbYDbcExtraits de l'épisode 5 de NUIT BLANCHE SUR LA BANQUISE - Série SPITZBERG (1996), réalisé par Marc Jampolsky :https://youtu.be/_p-pxzHWZPg?si=SOGtsN1XzPtpdcPjExtraits du podcast de Geek Squadron « Le Chant des Glaces : la critique sans spoiler ! » (avec leur amicale autorisation) : https://geeksquadron.lepodcast.fr/le-chant-des-glaces-la-critique-sans-spoiler Extrait du film « Rocky IV » réalisé par Sylvester Stallone, sorti en 1985 : https://youtu.be/iXGAn8c3P58?si=Lvm7s73OMoxUXIGS Extraits de GEO France, « Le 1er décembre 1959, le traité de l'Antarctique était signé à Washington » : https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LLp9utKHWIkLa chanson de fin est « Je rêvais d'un autre monde » interprétée en public par Téléphone en 1986 : https://youtu.be/WhdqA0CGCTo Rejoignez nous sur discordhttps://discord.gg/AGAeePNPeV Le lien pour connaître toutes les productions Galaxie Pop :https://linktr.ee/galaxiepop Et maintenant NOUVEAU un répondeur : Vos réactions (si vous le souhaitez on peut les diffuser en gazette et y répondre !)C'est là (attention c'est court) :https://www.speakpipe.com/Galaxiepop

Dans le cadre de la 38e édition du Festival Circa, en 2025, ARTCENA et Circa ont organisé une rencontre "Circ'à Penser" intitulée "la recherche comme enjeu de création pour le cirque". Les invités étaient la circassienne acrobate aérienne Elsa Caillat, le circassien spécialiste de la roue Cyr Stefan Kinsman, l'inspectrice de la création artistique à la DGCA du ministère de la Culture Elena Dapporto, la directrice de Circa - Pôle national cirque Stéphanie Bulteau et la directrice générale du CNAC. La rencontre était modérée par Gwenola David, directrice générale d'ARTCENA. Crédits : Production : ARTCENA

菅田将暉、1/14(水)にEP『SENSATION CIRCLE』リリース「五感」をテーマにした自身初のオールセルフプロデュース作品2017年から本格的に音楽活動を開始した菅田将暉2019年リリースの「まちがいさがし」は各配信ストアにて1位を席捲し、ストリーミング3億回再生を突破その年には『第70回NHK紅白歌合戦』への初出場を果たし、『第61回 日本レコード大賞』特別賞を受賞

tranquilles sur l'herbecrédit musichttps://alexasunshinerose.bandcamp.com/track/stars-up-abovecrédit vignette : Muriel Cayla studio elfe bleunos invités :Olivier Gechter que tu peux entendre plus longuement danshttps://lesvoixdeslivres.lepodcast.fr/la-grande-cuisine-cosmique-avec-olivier-gechteret retrouver son bloghttps://gechter.org/blog/ Saïd grand compagnon de Mana et plasma le podcastet surtout auteur :https://saidwords.org/ et circé :https://lodysseedecirce.lepodcast.fr/ et xp78 dans 90 % des plus beaux montages de podcast de la baladosphère !!!

Programa con Invitados. Vanesa García, presidenta de La Careta Teatre i Circ. También nos acompaña Víctor Diéguez de Nits de Música ADIVINANZA. Los Relámpagos. NIT DE LLAMPECS. SAN TORAL. Barbara Hendricks. AVE MARÍA de Schubert. Michel Camilo & Tomatito. LIBERTANGO. EFEMÉRIDES. Carl Perkins. BLUE SUEDE SHOES. Coro polifónico de La Laguna. CORO DE BOHEMIOS de la zarzuela […] The post Los Tres Tenores 19/11/2025 first appeared on Ripollet Ràdio.

T'apropa al món del circ d'ara i d'abans. Hi podeu trobar diverses seccions relacionades amb el circ, amb Cubelles, el pallasso Josep Andreu Charlie Rivel i a la seva filla, Paulina Schumann. Conté una agenda àmplia d'activitats i festivals per fer amb família. Presentat i dirigit per Mònica Fuster. El segon dimecres de mes es pot escoltar dins el Cubelles a les 10, a partir de les 10.30 h. podcast recorded with enacast.com

This week's Immigration Lawyers Toolbox® Podcast with John Q. Khosravi, Esq. covers the latest immigration law updates, USCIS trends, and practice tips. Recorded live every Monday, this series keeps attorneys sharp and informed. Timestamps: 00:00 – Opening 03:39 – Government Shutdown Update 04:17 – USCIS Adds $1,000 Parole Fee for DACA 05:01 – 9th Cir. Pushback on “Imperial Judiciary” Criticism 05:45 – Ninth Circuit Upholds Injunction Protecting Counsel for Unaccompanied Minors 06:25 – U.S. Revokes Visas Over Charlie Kirk-Linked Event07:53 – Supreme Court Declines Challenge to H-4 EAD Program (Spouses of H-1B Holders) 08:27 – No New AAO Decisions 09:19 – USCIS Policy Manual Update: Marriage Cases 12:52 – H-1B Site Update 13:27 – 3rd Cir.: No Duty to Warn Clients of Criminal Liability 14:07 – Outro 15:00 – Closing Show Notes: New Parole Fee 9th Circ. Flouting 'Imperial Judiciary' Warning, Judges Assert Ninth Circuit rejects government's latest attempt to overturn the preliminary injunction (PI) keeping legal representation for unaccompanied children in place!  U.S. revokes visas for 6 foreigners over Charlie Kirk-related speech The Supreme Court just declined to hear the challenge to the H-4 EAD program, thereby letting stand the D.C. Circuit's ruling that protects work authorization for certain spouses of H-1B visa holders USCIS policy manual update on Marriage Reminder about foreign divorces  USCIS H-1B website updated with $100k fee info 3rd Circ. Says No Duty To Inform Criminal Clients Of Liability Spotify | iTunes | YouTube Music | YouTube   Follow eimmigration by Cerenade: Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Start your Business Immigration Practice! (US LAWYERS ONLY - SCREENING REQUIRED): E-2 Course EB-1A Course Get the Toolbox Magazine!  Join our community (Lawyers Only) Get Started in Immigration Law! The Marriage/Family-Based Green Card course is for you Our Website: ImmigrationLawyersToolbox.com Not legal advice. Consult with an Attorney. Attorney Advertisement. #podcaster #Lawyer #ImmigrationLawyer #Interview #Immigration #ImmigrationAttorney #USImmigration #ImmigrationLaw #ImmigrationLawyersToolbox

This month on Episode 77 of Discover CircRes, host Cindy St. Hilaire highlights articles featured in the September 26th and October 10th issues of Circulation Research. This Episode also features a discussion with Dr Camilla Wenceslau and Dr Laena Pernomian about their study, Single-Short Partial Reprogramming of the Endothelial Cells Decreases Blood Pressure Via Attenuation of EndMT in Hypertensive Mice. Article highlights: Brito-Estrada, et al. DWORF Gene Therapy Attenuates Heart Failure Yamaguchi, et al. Calcium Oscillation Within Renin Cell Clusters Parthiban, et al. Macrophage CCL24 Promotes Fibrosis Gonzales, et al. Circ-cdr1as in Cardiac Repair

Seven countries that are members of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) submitted data on 77,688 container inspections in 2024 in line with MSC.1/ Circ.1649. The intent of this IMO Circular is to encourage governments to identify misdeclarations and poor packing practices to “justify and effect safety improvements without an actual incident happening”. Since adoption of this iteration of guidance on inspections from IMO, reports have increased by more than 50% from approximately 51,000 in 2022 to 77,700 in 2024. Less positively, the number of IMO member states reporting has not increased. 

Benvingudes i benvinguts al tretzé episodi de la novena temporada de Tots al Blitz! El primer programa en català dedicat a l’NFL. L’NFL és una competició privilegiada, on cada cap de setmana podem veure atletes molt complets fent un desplegament físic i tècnic que costa molt de trobar en qualsevol altre esport. Bàsicament perquè aquí el contacte és extrem però també necessites ser molt fi tècnicament si vols arribar lluny. Un joc on es reparteixen hòsties com pans però sempre va de menys d’un centímetre no és una cosa fàcil. I per això mateix també és un esport on els errors són molt importants. Cada setmana veiem cagades de l’alçada del campanar de Sau: Drops, flags fora de temps, peus que van a parar fora del camp quan no toca…però el d’aquesta setmana dels Cardinals és un recordatori de com d’important són els detalls a l’NFL. Arizona estava a punt de guanyar el partit amb tranquil·litat i dues cagades grans com l’ego de Manel Vidal. Vols la nostra samarreta? Aquí: https://nfl-en-catala.aixeta.cat/ca/campaigns#LDFNNH Apunta't al pick'em d'NFL en català: https://fantasy.espn.com/games/nfl-pigskin-pickem-2025/group?id=2f576645-7bd5-4980-b626-bd3b96da84ae&joining=true Recordeu que trobareu el programa a totes les plataformes de podcàsting habituals, i que ens podeu seguir a les xarxes socials a: Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/nflencatala.bsky.social Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nfl_encatala/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nfl_encatala YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@nfl_encatala Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/catalunyaradio I també el feed de programes: https://t.co/ZGvItz3DQn I no oblideu subscriure-us al nostre canal de Youtube per estar al dia de totes les novetats!

Most higher ed campaigns play it safe—and end up milk toast. In this episode of Talking Tactics, Safaniya Stevenson sits down with Baldwin&'s Ashley Yetman and Emily Watson to unpack why bold ideas beget bold design. Partnering with the North Carolina School Board Association on a hearts & minds campaign, they leaned into disarming nostalgic illustrations and creator collaborations to humanize messaging. They reveal how taking creative risks can unite communities, energize audiences, and spark real impact in education marketing.Guest Names:Ashley Yetman, Co-CEO, Director of Brand Strategy, Baldwin&Emily Watson, Group Creative Director, Baldwin&Guest Socials: Ashley Yetman - https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashley-yetman-a39a0b14/Emily Watson - https://www.linkedin.com/in/emily-watson-b9383312/Guest Bios:Ashley Yetman - As 1/3 of the kick-ass, co-CEO team, Ashley Yetman has been growing and leading the brand strategy practice at Baldwin& since 2016 — after years in the Bay Area, working on global brands like Apple, Audi, AAA and Callaway Golf. Since joining B&, she's tackled all things brand and strategy for brands across all industries; from established companies like Radio Flyer, Krispy Kreme, Gaia Herbs, Lansinoh, and KIOTI tractors, to start-up brands like Circ, Pivotal, Shibumi Shade, and Ithaca Hummus. Ashley has dedicated her career to helping companies extricate and articulate their inherent goodness, so they can live into their most real-est selves. ‘Cause she believes that being yourself (brand-self or human-self) is the best sales tool you can ever uncover. When she's not geeking out here at B&, she's either shredding mountains, at home in Durham putting up with her goofy-but-adorable sheepadoodle, or loving/negotiating every moment with her husband and two boys.Emily Watson - Emily Watson is Group Creative Director at Baldwin&, where she has led creative for Gaia Herbs, KIOTI Tractor, Long John Silver's, NCSBA, and Zulily. Since joining in 2019, she has played an integral role in growing the agency. She helped launch Take Your Seat, helping to increase Black representation in corporate boardrooms, and The Lieutenant Governor's Fund for the Fabulous, which won Gold at the Shorty Impact Awards and the Grand Award the ANA Awards. She previously did more creative stuff at MullenLowe and GSD&M, working on brands like BMW, Trésemme, Food Lion, and NC Lottery. She has many interests outside of work but is trying to keep this bio to an appropriate length and so will not bore you with stories about hiking and little kids and hound dogs. - - - -Connect With Our Host:Safaniya Stevensonhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/safaniyastevenson/ About The Enrollify Podcast Network:Talking Tactics is a part of the Enrollify Podcast Network. If you like this podcast, chances are you'll like other Enrollify shows too! Enrollify is made possible by Element451 — The AI Workforce Platform for Higher Ed. Learn more at element451.com. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Climate Week NYC kicked off just days after New York Fashion Week wrapped. In today's special Climate Week NYC episode of the All Things Sustainable podcast, we're exploring the intersection of sustainability and fashion in an interview with Peter Majeranowski, CEO and Co-Founder of circular fashion startup Circ.   Circ's investors include big brands like Patagonia and the parent company of Zara, as well as Breakthrough Energy Ventures, the investment firm founded by Bill Gates. Circ was also a finalist for the Earthshot Prize, which each year awards £1 million to five winners for their environmental solutions.  The apparel sector is a significant source of global emissions, and Peter explains how Circ promotes circularity by recycling clothing. He says that a lot of the technical challenges around recycling have been solved, and unlocking financing is the challenge that keeps him awake at night.   “For the bankers to get involved, they want to see long-term commitments from the brands, and that's a muscle that just does not exist in this industry,” he says. “That's the biggest challenge.”  Listen to our coverage from Climate Week NYC here: Kicking off Climate Week NYC in a fragmented global landscape | S&P Global  We'll be back with podcast interviews from Climate Week NYC throughout the week — including our coverage from The Nest Climate Campus, where the All Things Sustainable podcast is an official media partner. You can register free to attend here.     And you can learn more about the event S&P Global is hosting at Climate Week NYC here: Climate Week NYC | S&P Global  Learn more about S&P Global Sustainable1's physical climate risk dataset here.   This piece was published by S&P Global Sustainable1 and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global.    Copyright ©2025 by S&P Global      DISCLAIMER     By accessing this Podcast, I acknowledge that S&P GLOBAL makes no warranty, guarantee, or representation as to the accuracy or sufficiency of the information featured in this Podcast. The information, opinions, and recommendations presented in this Podcast are for general information only and any reliance on the information provided in this Podcast is done at your own risk. 

Un grup de persones de la Vall de Camprodon, a les quals s'hi han sumat gent i entitats de tot el país i de la Catalunya Nord, alertades per les informacions respecte al projecte de reformulació de Vallter que podria afectar àmpliament el Circ de Morens i d'Ull de Ter i la Vall de Carlat, hem estat analitzant la situació i la proposta que hi ha sobre la taula i hem decidit mobilitzar-se.Parlem amb Claudi Guisset, president de l'associació mediambiental Charles Flahaut i exconservador de la Reserva Natural de Pi

Bonjour à tous et bienvenue dans Callisto, le Podcast qui vous fait voyager à travers les récits mythiques et les légendes !Au milieu des eaux bleues et enchantées de la mer Égée, sur l'île mystérieuse d'Eéa, réside la puissante Circé. Dans la mythologie grecque, elle est la fille du resplendissant Hélios, le dieu du soleil et de la douce Persé, une nymphe venue de l'océan. Circé est une puissante et dangereuse magicienne, qui use d'incantations et de filtres pour métamorphoser les êtres humains en animaux…Bonne écoute !

In this episode of Impact at Scale, Zal Dastur speaks with Luke Henning, Chief Business Officer and Co-Founder of Circ, a company on a mission to eliminate textile waste through cutting-edge recycling technologies.Luke shares Circ's journey from bio-based chemicals to becoming a global leader in textile-to-textile recycling, the brutal challenges of scaling hard tech, and the role of brands, consumers, and regulation in reshaping the fashion industry.

Unsere beiden heutigen Gäste sind Gründer, Produktstrategen und leidenschaftliche Technologen, mit einem klaren Ziel: die Kundenkommunikation mit Hilfe von Künstlicher Intelligenz grundlegend neu zu denken. Der eine studierte an der WHU, an der University of Texas und in Shanghai, gründete bereits ein eigenes Start-up im Creator-Tech-Bereich und arbeitete bei Roland Berger, Infosys und Enpal. Was ihn auszeichnet: ein tiefes Verständnis für digitale Geschäftsmodelle und der Wille, komplexe Technologien so zu gestalten, dass sie echten Mehrwert schaffen. Der andere absolvierte seinen Bachelor in Computer Science an der Stanford University und startete dort auch einen Master, den er zur Hälfte abschloss, um sich ganz dem Unternehmertum zu widmen. Nach Stationen bei N26, BCG Digital Ventures, Circ und zuletzt als Software Engineer und Product Manager bei Pitch ist er heute Co-Founder und CTO von telli. Seine Schwerpunkte: künstliche Intelligenz, Human-Computer-Interaction und der Brückenschlag zwischen Technologie und Nutzererlebnis. Mit ihrem gemeinsamen Unternehmen telli entwickeln sie eine KI-gestützte Lösung, die es Unternehmen ermöglicht, ihre gesamte Kundenkommunikation über ein intelligentes System zu führen: automatisiert, empathisch und effizient. Ihr Ziel ist es, das Kundenerlebnis neu zu definieren und Menschen in Unternehmen zu entlasten, indem repetitive Kommunikationsaufgaben künftig von einer digitalen Instanz übernommen werden können. Seit über acht Jahren beschäftigen wir uns in diesem Podcast mit der Frage, wie Arbeit den Menschen stärkt, statt ihn zu schwächen. In fast 500 Gesprächen mit über 600 Menschen haben wir darüber gesprochen, was sich für sie geändert hat und was sich noch ändern muss. Was passiert mit Kundenbeziehungen, wenn Künstliche Intelligenz zum ersten Ansprechpartner wird? Wie gelingt es, technologische Effizienz mit menschlicher Empathie zu verbinden und ist das überhaupt möglich? Und was heißt „New Work“ in einer Zukunft, in der Kommunikation zunehmend automatisiert, aber dennoch bedeutungsvoll bleiben soll? Fest steht: Für die Lösung unserer aktuellen Herausforderungen brauchen wir neue Impulse. Und darum suchen wir weiter nach Methoden, Vorbildern, Erfahrungen, Tools und Ideen, die uns dem Kern von New Work näherbringen. Darüber hinaus beschäftigt uns von Anfang an die Frage, ob wirklich alle Menschen das finden und leben können, was sie im Innersten wirklich, wirklich wollen. Ihr seid bei On the Way to New Work, heute mit Finn zur Mühlen und Seb Hapte-Selassie von telli. [Hier](https://linktr.ee/onthewaytonewwork) findet ihr alle Links zum Podcast und unseren aktuellen Werbepartnern

If you're looking for content surrounding Rugby's European Champions Cup Final, then you should probably go elsewhere as there was just SO MUCH sport to get across this weekend that we couldn't find a spot anywhere.However, Johnny and Gav did find a gap to catch up with gentleman broadcaster Mark 'Pougy' Pougatch ahead of the release of his new podcast 'How It All Played Out', which is available from Tuesday 27th May on Global Player.You can hear The Kickabout live on Radio X from 11am every Saturday. Get in touch on kickabout@radiox.co.uk

Listener feedback on sports “disqualification,” big digoxin news, Brugada syndrome, another positive finerenone study, and unblinded transcatheter trials are discussed by John Mandrola, MD, in this week's podcast. This podcast is intended for healthcare professionals only. To read a partial transcript or to comment, visit: https://www.medscape.com/twic I Listener Feedback JACC EP Paper https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacep.2025.03.013 II Digoxin News DIGIT HF Baseline Characteristics paper https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3679 DIGIT HF Rationale paper https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6607489/ Dig trial https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199702203360801 DECISION trial https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ejhf.3428 Ziff et al BMJ meta-analysis https://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4451 III Brugada Syndrome Gomes et al https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf091 IV Another Finerenone Substudy Published FINEARTS-HF trial substudy, Bhatt, A et al https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.05.006 FINEARTS HF Main paper https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2407107 TOPCAT https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1313731 TOPCAT regional variation Circ paper https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.114.013255 V Another Opinion on Unblinded Transcatheter Intervention Trials Kaul https://eurointervention.pcronline.com/article/unblinded-trials-of-transcatheter-interventions-with-subjective-endpoints-what-are-the-implications You may also like: The Bob Harrington Show with the Stephen and Suzanne Weiss Dean of Weill Cornell Medicine, Robert A. Harrington, MD. https://www.medscape.com/author/bob-harrington Questions or feedback, please contact news@medscape.net

Host Philip Berman talks to Maxine Bedat, Executive Director at New Standard Institute, the official sponsor of the Fashion Environmental Accountability Act, a new bill introduced into the California State Assembly at the start of February 2025 which, if enacted, would become the first law in the country to require brands to engage in “environmental due diligence” concerning their products and supply chains.   This Californian Bill is essentially the same as the 'New York Fashion Act' which was introduced into the New York State legislature in 2022 - though it's not yet law - and which is also backed by Maxine, The New Standard Institute and a broad coalition of industry folk including influential names such as, Rothys, Everlane, Reformation, Eileen Fisher, Patagoina, ThredUp, Circ, Vestiaire Collective, Stella McCartney, Ganni, Faherty, Cotopaxi, NRDC, Sierra Club, Canopy, Trove, EVRNU, American Academy of Pediatrics. Full list at thefashionact.org Maxine talks about both bills, their purpose, what stage they have reached in the legislative process. what it's like trying to push through groundbreaking legislation in two states on opposite sides of the US, simultaneously, whether her work has become harder with President Trump in the White House, and how she manages to build broad support with politicians of all persuasions. Subscribe to Ecotextile Talks podcasts on Apple, Spotify and Amazon Music or have a look around our complete podcast archive here.    

Our story so far.. episode 92 looked at a study showing lower survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients treated with mechanical compression devices. Episode 93 discussed an implementation study of implementing LUCAS devices in a system with high quality pit crew CPR also showing lower survival, despite spending lots of time in training on how to optimally apply the LUCAS to avoid prolonged compression interruptions and movement. Now we're diving into the literature around AutoPulse, the load-distributing band device. We'll cover two randomized controlled trials and one well-done observational study comparing AutoPulse to manual CPR. Don't worry, LUCAS studies will be in the next episode.Citations1. Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Christenson J, Anton AR, Mosesso VN, Van Ottingham L, Olsufka M, Pennington S, White LJ, et al.: Manual Chest Compression vs Use of an Automated Chest Compression Device During Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2006;June 14;295(22).2. Ong MEH, Ornato JP, Edwards DP, Dhindsa HS, Best AM, Ines CS, Hickey S, Clark B, Williams DC, Powell RG, et al.: Use of an Automated, Load-Distributing Band Chest Compression Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. JAMA. 2006;June 14;295(22).3. Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Malzer R, Van Grunsven PM, et al.: Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;June;85(6):741–8.

Programa 5x80, amb Gori Masip. Tenim un altre artista de circ, per

In this episode of Keeping Abreast, I sit down with Dr. Sharon Stills to uncover the hidden factors that impact healing—from oral health and scars to the lymphatic system and emotional well-being. We also dive into the dangers of hormonal birth control, the rise of metabolic syndrome, and why early cancer detection and lifestyle changes are critical for lasting wellness. We discuss how healing isn't about symptoms—it's about understanding the body as a whole!In This Episode, You will Learn:

We know the literature on mechanical CPR devices on mortality in out of hospital cardiac arrest (we DO know this literature, right?), but what about in-hospital arrest? Dr. Jarvis reviews a recent paper that uses the AHA Get With The Guidelines - Resuscitation registry to assess the association between MCDs and mortality. Citations1. Crowley C, Salciccioli J, Wang W, Tamura T, Kim EY, Moskowitz A: The association between mechanical CPR and outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational cohort study. Resuscitation. 2024;May 1;198.2. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, Boomars R, Ahlstedt B, Skoog G, Kastberg R, et al.: Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation vs Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2014;January 1;311(1):53–613. Hardig BM, Lindgren E, Östlund O, Herlitz J, Karlsten R, Rubertsson S: Outcome among VF/VT patients in the LINC (LUCAS IN cardiac arrest) trial—A randomised, controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2017;June;115:155–62.4.  Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, Lamb SE, Slowther A-M, Woollard M, Carson A, et al.: Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9972):947–55.5.  Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, Westfall M, Souders CM, Malzer R, Van Grunsven PM, et al.: Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;June;85(6):741–8.6. Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, Verhaert DVM, Verheugt FWA, Smeets JLRM, Boer M-J de: Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies. Ann Emerg Med Annals of emergency medicine. 2016;67(3):349-360.e3.7. Gonzales L, Oyler BK, Hayes JL, Escott ME, Cabanas JG, Hinchey PR, Brown LH: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes with “pit crew” resuscitation and scripted initiation of mechanical CPR. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019;May;37(5):913–20.8. Koster RW, Beenen LF, Van Der Boom EB, Spijkerboer AM, Tepaske R, Van Der Wal AC, Beesems SG, Tijssen JG: Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority. European Heart Journal. 2017;October 21;38(40):3006–13.9. Primi R, Bendotti S, Currao A, Sechi GM, Marconi G, Pamploni G, Panni G, Sgotti D, Zorzi E, Cazzaniga M, et al.: Use of Mechanical Chest Compression for Resuscitation in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest—Device Matters: A Propensity-Score-Based Match Analysis. JCM. 2023;June 30;12(13):4429.10. Youngquist ST, Ockerse P, Hartsell S, Stratford C, Taillac P: Mechanical chest compression devices are associated with poor neurological survival in a statewide registry: A propensity score analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;September;106:102–7.11.  S, Sulzgruber P, Datler P, Keferböck M, Poppe M, Lobmeyr E, Van Tulder R, Zajicek A, Buchinger A, Polz K, et al.: Mechanical chest compression does not seem to improve outcome after out-of hospital cardiac arrest. A single center observational trial. Resuscitation. 2015;November;96:220–5. 12. Morgan S, Gray JJ, Sams W, Uhl K, Gundrum M, McMullan J: LUCAS Device Use Associated with Prolonged Pauses during Application and Long Chest Compression Intervals. Prehospital Emergency Care. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2183294 (Epub ahead of print).13.  Levy M, Yost D, Walker RG, Scheunemann E, Mendive SR: A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;July;92:32–7.14.  Li H, Wang D, Yu Y, Zhao X, Jing X: Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;December;24(1):10.15.  Sheraton M, Columbus J, Surani S, Chopra R, Kashyap R: Effectiveness of Mechanical Chest Compression Devices over Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. WestJEM. 2021;July 19;22(4):810–9.16.  Wang PL, Brooks SC: Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst Rev The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;20;8:CD007260.17.  Zhu N, Chen Q, Jiang Z, Liao F, Kou B, Tang H, Zhou M: A meta-analysis of the resuscitative effects of mechanical and manual chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Crit Care. 2019;December;23(1):100.

Programa 5x59, amb Judit Neddermann. A ning

Soixantième numéro du podcast Pourquoi Buffy c'est génial. Podcast complètement exceptionnel avec Sarthman, Riley, Malaurie, Clément et Xavier à la technique ainsi qu'une invitée incroyable : Agathe ! Nous analysons ensemble le cinquième épisode de la deuxième saison : Reptile Boy (Devotion)Écrit et réalisé par David Greenwalt il fut diffusé pour la première fois le 13 octobre 1997.Nous vous proposons de revivre avec nous cet épisode sous forme de commentaires audio un peu particuliers dans lesquels nous tenterons d'analyser l'écriture, les personnages, la réalisation… Tout ce qui fait de Buffy une série si particulière et tellement sous estimée en France. A travers Reptile Boy, nous aborderons les classes sociales, la masculinité toxique, le patriarcat, les fraternités américaines, le MMA, les symboles phalliques...Toutes les infos du podcast ici : pourquoibuffycestgenial.wordpress.com, discord.gg/feWftHmNous parlerons également :de la bande dessinée Love Everlasting (https://www.urban-comics.com/love-everlasting-tome-1/)du roman Circé de Madeline Miller (https://www.ruefromentin.fr/catalogue/circe/)du film The Substance (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNlrGhBpYjc)du film As Above So Below (catacombes en VF) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_BaqNzdGXY)Des gros bisous à Maelis, barbycool87, Juliette, Elodie, Laurène, Sylvie, Laurène et le chat !Bon épisode.

PREVIEW: MUSK: Colleague Jim McTague reports that Elon Musk and his million-dollar checks are coming to the tidy and comfortable Lancaster City next week to promote free speech and the Republican ticket, and there is already much excitement as if the circus is en route. More tonight. 1945 Lancaster City, PA

In this episode of Behind the Bench, we are talking with Hannah Cizauskas about her first, first-author article published in AJP-Heart and Circ. Born and raised in Detroit, Hannah moved to Chicago for what she thought would be just one rotation outside of the cancer genetics field. This led Hannah to work on a project related to atrial fibrillation and contractile dysfunction in Dave Barefield's lab at Loyola University Chicago's Cellular and Molecular Physiology Department. Now in the fourth year of her PhD, Hannah is a dog mom to Jake, she loves reading STEMinist novels, and she is researching sarcomere dysfunction in the context of AFib. Listen to this engaging interview with co-hosts Dr. Tommy Martin and Dr. Charlotte Usselman to find out more.   Hannah E. Cizauskas, Hope V. Burnham, Azaria Panni, Alexandra Peña, Alejandro Alvarez-Arce, M. Therese Davis, Kelly N. Araujo, Christine E. Delligatti, Eby Edassery, Jonathan A. Kirk, Rishi Arora, and David Y. Barefield Proteolytic degradation of atrial sarcomere proteins underlies contractile defects in atrial fibrillation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, published August 5, 2024. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00148.2024

Welcome to Side Character Quest, a one-on-one actual play podcast set in a world where cicadas sing, rivers flow, magic thrums through the air, and all of it's surrounded by a single massive Wall as ancient as history itself. Meet Abbot Faer Landing, the leader of Indigo Abbey, a quiet little community upriver from the grand city of Circ. A stranger approaches. What do they want from Faer? This quest's guest player is Joshua Lorimer, best known for playing Graeak on the actual play podcast Sneak Attack! and for creating the other actual play podcast The Titans of All'Terra! Listeners may also know him for his role as Buster on I Cast Fireball, or they may have even gotten to play a game with him, since he also works as a professional GM on the site Start Playing. Want to learn more about Ty, SCQ's host (and GM and producer and editor and...)? Content Warning for this quest: Violence. Death. Brief, off-screen harm to a child. Have questions for us, or just want to say hi? Website: Contact form or Press Kit Email: SideCharacterQuest@gmail.com Twitter: @SCQpodcast Instagram: @SCQpodcast Discord: Scavengers Network LinkTree: SideCharacterQuest Thanks to Briar for lending a voice to our credits! To hear more, check out one of Briar's own side character quests as Deirdre, a monster hunting cleric! Proud member of the Scavengers Network.

Mara Hoffman began her eponymous brand in 2000 by designing and selling one-of-a-kind, handmade garments out of her New York apartment. Twenty-three years later, she's still known for making gorgeous statement pieces with bold colors and prints, but she continues to evolve her approach toward sustainable design and manufacturing. Hoffman recently partnered with textile-to-textile recycling company Circ to release a groundbreaking dress made from 50% recycled textile waste, and she is this year's CFDA Environmental Sustainability Award honoree. This week, Editor in Chief Kat Collings sat down with Hoffman to discuss designing from a place of honesty, the "change or die" mentality, and where they hope fashion is headed.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Over one hundred billion garments will be produced this year, but they don't have to be. Peter Majeranowski says we have all the clothes we need to make all the clothing we'll ever need, and his company, Circ, has pioneered the technology to prove it. This week on How I Built This Lab, Peter shares how trying to create fuel from tobacco unintentionally led to the creation of a different material — pulp that could go back to the beginning of the supply chain and close the loop on fast fashion. Plus, the future of sustainability in the industry and the impact brands can have on the environment simply by changing their fabric sources. This episode was produced by Carla Esteves and edited by John Isabella, with research help from J.C. Howard. Our music was composed by Ramtin Arablouei. Our audio engineer was James Willetts.You can follow HIBT on Twitter & Instagram, and email us at hibt@id.wondery.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.