Podcasts about interviewer

 Following their removal from Samuel Bateman's FLDS offshoot, the rescued minors were interviewed by trained forensic specialists. They disclosed nothing verbally about the conduct documented in the case. Their journals — recovered during the FBI's execution of search warrants — contained detailed accounts: dates, descriptions, and names, recorded in their own handwriting. The dissociation between written and verbal disclosure represents a specific clinical phenomenon in cases involving prolonged coercive control during childhood development.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, with more than thirty years of experience in forensic mental health, domestic violence, and coercive control, examines the psychological mechanisms at work. Bateman's "atonement ceremonies" — group acts conducted under the framework of divine commandment — functioned to normalize harm within a closed belief system. The behavioral presentations visible in documentary footage that viewers have interpreted as voluntary participation reflect clinical indicators of conditioned compliance, not choice. Eight minors went willingly with Bateman's wives when they were removed from foster care — a fact that demonstrates the depth of the psychological infrastructure Bateman had constructed.The co-defendants' cases present an unresolved moral and legal question. The women convicted of facilitating harm to children were themselves raised within the FLDS system, married off as teenagers, and conditioned from birth within the same coercive framework they subsequently perpetuated. Scott and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine whether the legal system's binary framework can adequately address individuals who are simultaneously perpetrators and products of the same system.The investigative timeline preceding the FBI's intervention compounds the case's complexity. Christine Marie provided footage to local law enforcement repeatedly. The responding sergeant reportedly found the material credible but declined to act. The Short Creek community had normalized practices that constituted criminal conduct for decades. The recording that precipitated federal action came in late 2021: Bateman's own voice describing the transfer of wives to his male followers, including a minor. Christine subsequently facilitated the cooperation of Julia Johnson, a mother whose four daughters had been placed with Bateman, and assisted in physically removing the girls to enable the federal operation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#SamuelBateman #FLDS #ChristineMarie #TrustMeNetflix #ShortCreek #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke #CultTrauma #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Send us Fan MailMitali Jalan was told she couldn't break into consulting as a chartered accountant. She was told it was unlikely she'd land Bain as an international MBA student. She got the offers anyway.She worked at Deloitte India and Bain London, then sat on the other side of the table as a Bain interviewer. She's coached over 350 candidates and knows where people lose the offer.The thing she kept seeing? Candidates who spent weeks on case prep, walked in technically ready, and still didn't get it. The gap wasn't knowledge.We cover:How to recruit for a firm in a country that isn't yoursWhy "nice" is not a soft factor at Bain – and how to train for itWhat made Mitali stop reading a CV in secondsHow to track your prep so you're fixing the right things, not just logging casesResources:Work with Mitali directlyReady to break into MBB? Black Belt is the case prep program for serious candidatesBook a free 15-minute call with Katie to map out your pathFree Consulting Prep Just Got a Whole Lot BetterCreate a free MC account for access to step-by-step learning pathways, a brand new case prep course, and more. Download the MC app to prep anywhere.Connect With Management ConsultedCreate a free MC account or download the MC app (Apple, Android) to start your prep todaySchedule a free 15min consultation with the MC TeamWatch the video version of the podcast on YouTubeFollow us on LinkedIn, Instagram, and TikTokJoin an upcoming live event – case interviews demos, expert panels, and more

This next guest began her career in the independent wrestling scene in 2021 and, as of this taping, has worked across 11 states. She has been featured on platforms such as IWTV, Triller (FITE), and Title Match Network.She has conducted interviews and attended media scrums, sharing her coverage through her own YouTube channel as well as other wrestling media outlets. In addition, she has expanded her presence in the industry by working as a ring announcer and backstage correspondent for a variety of promotions and events.Throughout her journey, she has had the opportunity to work with notable names such as Shotzi Blackheart, Nic Nemeth, Matt Cardona, Danhausen, Nick Gage, and many others.Please join us in welcoming our next guest: Smaira!SamiraX/Twitter: https://x.com/TheSamiraRose IG: https://www.instagram.com/thesamiraroseTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thesamiraroseYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheSamiraRoseCrazy Train RadioFacebook: facebook.com/realctradioInstagram: @crazytrainradioX/Twitter: @realctradioBlueSky: @crazytrainradio.bsky.socialWebsite: crazytrainradio.usYouTube: youtube.com/crazytrainradio

Constance Harris, Interviewer for the Roost News Podcast interviewed Katherine Lewis, Associate State Office Director, Maryland AARP State Office and Shirley Sgouros, 2025 Andrus Award Winner for Maryland. Kathy shares the process that the AARP Maryland State Office uses to select their Andrus Award Winners. The 2025 Winner, Shirley Sgouros shares feedback on being selected from the Maryland Community, what her volunteer work covers, and how she balances being a Caregiving while being active as a volunteer in her community. Shirley Sgouros is congratulated for being among the 53 AARP State Offices who select an Andrus Award Winner yearly.

➤ Entdecke flexgold! Investiere in physisches Gold und sichere Deine Werte. Außerdem unterstützt Du Fair Talk bei Deinem nächsten Goldkauf über diesen Link: https://www.fairtalk.tv/flexgold ➤ Unsere Gäste trinken Wasser gefiltert mit AQUOSS Filteranlagen. AQUOSS Lichtwasser erhellt die Sinne und bringt den Bewohnern der Erde Vitalität und Wohlergehen. https://aquoss.com Die Fragen und Antworten zur Talk-Show mit Christian Schneider und seinen Gästen Michael "Stahlfeder" Werner, Ben Richter, Jan A. Karon und Peter Müller

Digital dentistry started in the 1980s. But according to Dr Wolf-Dieter Perlitz, we're now entering something entirely new: the era of connected dentistry.In this episode of The Dental Practitioner, host Dr Dominic Aouad sits down with Wolf-Dieter — Head of DS Core Product Management at Dentsply Sirona — to unpack what that means for dentists right now and over the next decade.With a background in engineering and health economics, Wolf-Dieter brings a rare perspective to the conversation: one that balances the technical reality of cloud computing and AI with the practical business case for adoption in everyday practice.They cover the three pillars driving connected dentistry — growth, efficiency, and outcome — and discuss how DS Core acts as a single platform to connect equipment, labs, patients, and clinical workflows. Wolf-Dieter also reflects on 40 years of CEREC, the patient-first mission that started it all, and why the dentists who adopt cloud technology earlier will have the longest runway for the innovations still to come.Topics covered: what connected dentistry means and why it's distinct from digital dentistry, DS Core as a cloud-native platform, AI applications in clinical workflows, integration with third-party equipment and labs, the business case for cloud adoption, cybersecurity, the CEREC origin story, and what the next 40 years of innovation look like.Interviewer(s): Dr Dominic AouadInterviewee(s): Dr Wolf-Dieter PerlitzRelated Course/Event/Links: Dentsply SironaThe Dental Practitioner is brought to you by the Australian Dental Association NSW. Find resources, episodes, and more at adansw.com.au.If you want to stay up to date with the latest developments in dentistry, check out our upcoming CPD courses at adansw.com.au/cpd.

The iconic New York City red carpet interviewer George Whipple has a rich and surprising backstory – and it goes beyond his show-stopping eyebrows. George Whipple and director Adam Paul Verity discuss the new documentary, “Whipple's World,” where the tables are turned and George becomes the subject. The film premieres at the Tribeca Film Festival. Photo by Gary Gershoff/WireImage: NY 1 entertainment reporter George Whipple interviews Elmo at the 7th Annual Only Make Believe Gala at Millennium Hotel's Hudson Theatre on November 5, 2007 in New York City. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Step aside humans. AI bots are running job interviews. Listen here for tips to beat the algorithm. Plus, Jim's sister thought she found love online. She found a scam. She lost over $700,000 to a man named Robert who never showed. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

9 juni#9 – Conny van Rietschoten en de Whitbreadraces van de Flyer I en Flyer IIGerard Dijkstra en Onne van der WalIn deze negende aflevering van Boegbeelden & Bliktrekkers staat één van de grootste prestaties uit de Nederlandse zeilgeschiedenis centraal. Presentator Erik Peekel gaat in gesprek met Gerard Dijkstra en Onne van der Wal, bemanningsleden van de legendarische Flyer I en Flyer II van Maaslid Conny van Rietschoten. Samen wonnen zij de Whitbread Round the World Race, de zwaarste oceaanzeilrace ter wereld en de voorloper van The Ocean Race. Van de voorbereidingen op de werf van Huisman en de duizenden trainingsmijlen voorafgaand aan de start tot de strijd met de Britse King's Legend en Ceramco New Zealand, en de historische overwinningen met huldiging in de Veerhaven bij De Maas. Gerard en Onne nemen je mee aan boord van twee campagnes die de internationale zeilwereld voorgoed veranderden. In deze aflevering ontdek je:• De geboorte van legendes: Hoe Conny van Rietschoten er in slaagde om tweemaal de Whitbreadrace rond de wereld te winnen, met een zeer professionelevoorbereiding en aanpak.• Leven op de oceaan: Over technische problemen, de concurrentiestrijd met CERAMCO New Zealand en de hartaanval van Conny midden op de Zuidelijke Oceaan. • De nalatenschap van Flyer: Hoe Gerard uitgroeide tot internationaal topontwerper en Onne tot één van de bekendste nautische fotografen ter wereld. Een inspirerende aflevering over oceaanzeilen, avontuur, innovatie, doorzettingsvermogen en de blijvende erfenis van Conny van Rietschoten en de Flyer-campagnes binnen De Maas. podcastmaker: Rik BoumanConny van RietschotenHuismanEdgar KoekenbakkerDaniel BlosowskiFlying WilmaSeramcoKings LegendMaltese FalconStad AmsterdamThe episode centers on the illustrious accomplishments of Gerard Dijkstra and Onne van der Wal, who, alongside Conny van Rietschoten, triumphed in the Whitbread Round the World Race aboard the Flyer 2. This victory, now almost fifty years past, serves as a poignant reminder of the extraordinary challenges faced and surmounted during the race, particularly the emotional and physical trials encountered by the crew. The dialogue not only recounts the thrilling moments of the race but also delves into the celebrations that followed their return to Rotterdam, where they were met with jubilant crowds and royal acclaim. Through their reflections, we gain insight into the camaraderie that developed among the crew and the pivotal role of leadership in their success, especially during critical moments when the skipper faced health crises. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the lasting impact of their experiences on maritime endeavors and the inspiration they continue to provide for future generations of sailors.Amidst the vibrant cityscape of Rotterdam, the illustrious Sociëteit of the Koninklijke Roei- en Zijlvereniging De Maas stands as a testament to maritime heritage, having forged an indelible connection between the city and its waterways for a remarkable 175 years. In this enlightening discourse, I engage with two distinguished figures, Gerard Dijkstra and Onne van der Wal, who recount their extraordinary victory alongside Conny van Rietschoten in the Whitbread Round the World Race, a pinnacle event in the realm of ocean racing. The episode delves into the profound significance of their triumph, not merely as a sporting achievement but as a cultural milestone that resonates deeply within the fabric of Dutch maritime history. Our conversation navigates through the celebratory moments following their victory in 1982, where the jubilation was palpable along the Maas, as hundreds of spectators gathered to honor the team's remarkable feat. Onne vividly recalls the atmosphere aboard the Flyer 2, detailing the emotional weight of sailing back to Rotterdam, where they were greeted by throngs of supporters and the royal presence of Prince Bernhard. The narrative unfolds with anecdotes of camaraderie, the challenges faced during their journey, and the ineffable joy of returning to their homeland as champions. Moreover, we explore the legacy of the Flyer series and the pioneering spirit of Conny van Rietschoten, whose ambitious vision propelled the team to unprecedented heights. The episode encapsulates not only the technical intricacies and strategic decisions that characterized their racing journey but also serves as an inspiration to future generations of sailors. The confluence of personal stories and historical significance renders this discussion a compelling homage to the enduring spirit of maritime adventure and excellence. The episode unfolds against the backdrop of the celebrated Sociëteit of the Koninklijke Roei- en Zijlvereniging De Maas in Rotterdam, a venue steeped in maritime tradition. During our discussion, I, alongside Gerard Dijkstra and Onne van der Wal, delve into the storied history of the Whitbread Round the World Race, highlighting the pivotal role that their victory in 1982 played in revitalizing Dutch interest in ocean sailing. Central to our conversation is the vibrant recollection of the festive atmosphere accompanying their return to Rotterdam post-race. The jubilation was not merely a celebration of victory but a reaffirmation of national pride in sailing, as the city welcomed its heroes upon their triumphant return. Onne shares evocative memories of the procession through the streets, the cheers of the crowd, and the honor bestowed upon them by dignitaries, all of which underline the cultural significance of their achievement. As we journey through their experiences, we also reflect on the technical challenges and strategic maneuvers that defined their race, emphasizing the collaborative effort that characterized the Flyer 2's campaign. The legacies of both Conny van Rietschoten and the Flyer series emerge as vital threads in our narrative, illustrating how their pioneering spirit and commitment to excellence continue to inspire new generations of sailors. This episode is a heartfelt tribute to the enduring nature of maritime adventure, camaraderie, and the relentless pursuit of achievement.Takeaways:The Royal Rowing and Sailing Society De Maas has been a symbol of Rotterdam for 175 years, connecting the city with its waters in a unique manner.The Whitbread Race, considered the ultimate ocean race, saw the Flyer 2 win under the leadership of Conny van Rietschoten, marking a significant achievement in sailing history.The journey to the 1982 Whitbread Race victory was fraught with challenges, such as equipment failures, yet the crew maintained an unwavering focus on their objectives.Gerard Dijkstra's experience highlights the vital importance of ship seaworthiness and crew comfort in the design of successful sailing vessels throughout his career.The camaraderie developed during the Whitbread Race has fostered lasting bonds among crew members, with many reuniting nearly fifty years later for celebrations.The significance of youth engagement in sailing, as discussed by our guests, underscores the necessity of inspiring the next generation to pursue maritime adventures and competitive sailing.

9 juni#9 – Conny van Rietschoten en de Whitbreadraces van de Flyer I en Flyer IIGerard Dijkstra en Onne van der WalIn deze negende aflevering van Boegbeelden & Bliktrekkers staat één van de grootste prestaties uit de Nederlandse zeilgeschiedenis centraal. Presentator Erik Peekel gaat in gesprek met Gerard Dijkstra en Onne van der Wal, bemanningsleden van de legendarische Flyer I en Flyer II van Maaslid Conny van Rietschoten. Samen wonnen zij de Whitbread Round the World Race, de zwaarste oceaanzeilrace ter wereld en de voorloper van The Ocean Race. Van de voorbereidingen op de werf van Huisman en de duizenden trainingsmijlen voorafgaand aan de start tot de strijd met de Britse King's Legend en Ceramco New Zealand, en de historische overwinningen met huldiging in de Veerhaven bij De Maas. Gerard en Onne nemen je mee aan boord van twee campagnes die de internationale zeilwereld voorgoed veranderden. In deze aflevering ontdek je:• De geboorte van legendes: Hoe Conny van Rietschoten er in slaagde om tweemaal de Whitbreadrace rond de wereld te winnen, met een zeer professionelevoorbereiding en aanpak.• Leven op de oceaan: Over technische problemen, de concurrentiestrijd met CERAMCO New Zealand en de hartaanval van Conny midden op de Zuidelijke Oceaan. • De nalatenschap van Flyer: Hoe Gerard uitgroeide tot internationaal topontwerper en Onne tot één van de bekendste nautische fotografen ter wereld. Een inspirerende aflevering over oceaanzeilen, avontuur, innovatie, doorzettingsvermogen en de blijvende erfenis van Conny van Rietschoten en de Flyer-campagnes binnen De Maas. podcastmaker: Rik BoumanConny van RietschotenHuismanEdgar KoekenbakkerDaniel BlosowskiFlying WilmaSeramcoKings LegendMaltese FalconStad AmsterdamThe episode centers on the illustrious accomplishments of Gerard Dijkstra and Onne van der Wal, who, alongside Conny van Rietschoten, triumphed in the Whitbread Round the World Race aboard the Flyer 2. This victory, now almost fifty years past, serves as a poignant reminder of the extraordinary challenges faced and surmounted during the race, particularly the emotional and physical trials encountered by the crew. The dialogue not only recounts the thrilling moments of the race but also delves into the celebrations that followed their return to Rotterdam, where they were met with jubilant crowds and royal acclaim. Through their reflections, we gain insight into the camaraderie that developed among the crew and the pivotal role of leadership in their success, especially during critical moments when the skipper faced health crises. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the lasting impact of their experiences on maritime endeavors and the inspiration they continue to provide for future generations of sailors.Amidst the vibrant cityscape of Rotterdam, the illustrious Sociëteit of the Koninklijke Roei- en Zijlvereniging De Maas stands as a testament to maritime heritage, having forged an indelible connection between the city and its waterways for a remarkable 175 years. In this enlightening discourse, I engage with two distinguished figures, Gerard Dijkstra and Onne van der Wal, who recount their extraordinary victory alongside Conny van Rietschoten in the Whitbread Round the World Race, a pinnacle event in the realm of ocean racing. The episode delves into the profound significance of their triumph, not merely as a sporting achievement but as a cultural milestone that resonates deeply within the fabric of Dutch maritime history. Our conversation navigates through the celebratory moments following their victory in 1982, where the jubilation was palpable along the Maas, as hundreds of spectators gathered to honor the team's remarkable feat. Onne vividly recalls the atmosphere aboard the Flyer 2, detailing the emotional weight of sailing back to Rotterdam, where they were greeted by throngs of supporters and the royal presence of Prince Bernhard. The narrative unfolds with anecdotes of camaraderie, the challenges faced during their journey, and the ineffable joy of returning to their homeland as champions. Moreover, we explore the legacy of the Flyer series and the pioneering spirit of Conny van Rietschoten, whose ambitious vision propelled the team to unprecedented heights. The episode encapsulates not only the technical intricacies and strategic decisions that characterized their racing journey but also serves as an inspiration to future generations of sailors. The confluence of personal stories and historical significance renders this discussion a compelling homage to the enduring spirit of maritime adventure and excellence. The episode unfolds against the backdrop of the celebrated Sociëteit of the Koninklijke Roei- en Zijlvereniging De Maas in Rotterdam, a venue steeped in maritime tradition. During our discussion, I, alongside Gerard Dijkstra and Onne van der Wal, delve into the storied history of the Whitbread Round the World Race, highlighting the pivotal role that their victory in 1982 played in revitalizing Dutch interest in ocean sailing. Central to our conversation is the vibrant recollection of the festive atmosphere accompanying their return to Rotterdam post-race. The jubilation was not merely a celebration of victory but a reaffirmation of national pride in sailing, as the city welcomed its heroes upon their triumphant return. Onne shares evocative memories of the procession through the streets, the cheers of the crowd, and the honor bestowed upon them by dignitaries, all of which underline the cultural significance of their achievement. As we journey through their experiences, we also reflect on the technical challenges and strategic maneuvers that defined their race, emphasizing the collaborative effort that characterized the Flyer 2's campaign. The legacies of both Conny van Rietschoten and the Flyer series emerge as vital threads in our narrative, illustrating how their pioneering spirit and commitment to excellence continue to inspire new generations of sailors. This episode is a heartfelt tribute to the enduring nature of maritime adventure, camaraderie, and the relentless pursuit of achievement.Takeaways:The Royal Rowing and Sailing Society De Maas has been a symbol of Rotterdam for 175 years, connecting the city with its waters in a unique manner.The Whitbread Race, considered the ultimate ocean race, saw the Flyer 2 win under the leadership of Conny van Rietschoten, marking a significant achievement in sailing history.The journey to the 1982 Whitbread Race victory was fraught with challenges, such as equipment failures, yet the crew maintained an unwavering focus on their objectives.Gerard Dijkstra's experience highlights the vital importance of ship seaworthiness and crew comfort in the design of successful sailing vessels throughout his career.The camaraderie developed during the Whitbread Race has fostered lasting bonds among crew members, with many reuniting nearly fifty years later for celebrations.The significance of youth engagement in sailing, as discussed by our guests, underscores the necessity of inspiring the next generation to pursue maritime adventures and competitive sailing.

Gia Miller is one of the most recognizable personalities in TNA Wrestling, serving as the company's backstage interviewer, host, and on-screen correspondent. Beyond conducting interviews with the biggest stars in TNA, Gia has also stepped into the ring herself, most notably competing against Tessa Blanchard at Bound For Glory. With years of experience in broadcasting and professional wrestling, she has become a trusted voice and familiar face for TNA fans around the world. In the newest "Casual Conversations with The Classic'' episode, the Wrestling Classic Justin chats with TNA's Gia Miller. They discuss her introduction to pro wrestling, backstage interviewing, wrestling Tessa Blanchard, funniest superstars and more! Enjoy!My Official Website + Demo Reel - https://www.justindhillon.com Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/thewrestlingclassic/ TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@thewrestlingclassic X - https://x.com/twcworldwide Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/@TheWrestlingClassic/ Limited Edition TWC Tee https://headquartersclothing.com/products/headquarters-x-the-wrestling-classic-logo-tee?_pos=1&_psq=wrestlinhg&_ss=e&_v=1.0 WWE Shop Affiliate wwe-shop.sjv.io/RGRxQv 500 Level https://www.500level.com/ Join the Discord Community https://linktr.ee/thewrestlingclassic All Episodes are on "The Wrestling Classic" Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOQOYraeFlX-xd8f3adQtTw#GiaMiller #TNAWrestling #MeanGia #BackstageInterview Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/twc-show--4417554/support.

One of the biggest mistakes job candidates make is thinking the interview is only about what they say. So they spend all their time preparing answers and trying to sound impressive. Meanwhile… The interviewers are reacting, signaling, judging, connecting, disengaging, leaning in, checking out, growing skeptical, getting interested, and making real-time decisions based on how they feel. Most job candidates never notice any of it. They walk out thinking, That went pretty well. Then they never hear back. Ouch. Strong candidates don't just answer questions.

Afl. 223 - Wat gebeurt er als je als radioloog in de scanner ligt en ineens zelf patiënt wordt? In de eerste aflevering van onze nieuwe serie Arts als Patiënt spreken we met Dr. Aukje van Tilborg: radioloog, moeder van drie en fotograaf.Na haar diagnose met een meningeoom in 2022 belandde zij plots aan de andere kant van het bed. We praten over hoe het is om ziek te zijn als arts, de blinde vlekken binnen de zorg en waarom mentale gezondheid in het ziekenhuis vaak onderbelicht blijft. Ook vertelt Aukje hoe fotografie haar hielp tijdens haar ziekteproces (zie slide 3 op socials).

Afl. 223 - Wat gebeurt er als je als radioloog in de scanner ligt en ineens zelf patiënt wordt? In de eerste aflevering van onze nieuwe serie Arts als Patiënt spreken we met Dr. Aukje van Tilborg: radioloog, moeder van drie en fotograaf.Na haar diagnose met een meningeoom in 2022 belandde zij plots aan de andere kant van het bed. We praten over hoe het is om ziek te zijn als arts, de blinde vlekken binnen de zorg en waarom mentale gezondheid in het ziekenhuis vaak onderbelicht blijft. Ook vertelt Aukje hoe fotografie haar hielp tijdens haar ziekteproces (zie slide 3 op socials).

Diesmal haben wir Comedian und Podcaster Tekin Kesen zur Gast. Thomas und Erika erkennen, dass sie schlechte Interviewer sind. Wir fragen uns, wie narzisstisch Deutschland ist. Ob Comedy Psychotherapie ersetzen kann. Wir kommen zur Erkenntnis, dass „die große Liebe des Lebens“ ein patriarchalisches und kapitalistisches Konstrukt ist. Und in Deutschland mansplainen sogar Frauen.Hört mal in Tekins Podcast rein, es geht um Comedy, Leben und Lieblingsgerichte: Spag Bolo. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

I dette afsnit af ’Poptillægget’ ringer Lucia Odoom til sanger, producer og danser FKA Twigs, der er kendt for at bygge verdener i sin musik – senest på de to album ’Eusexua’ og ’Eusexua Afterglow’. Med sin blanding af electronica, ambient, klassisk musik og avantgardistisk R&B har hun indtaget scener over hele verden med koncerter, der mest af alt minder om performancekunst. Da hun lagde vejen forbi Roskilde Festival i sommer, var der både et samuraisvær og en stripperstang på scenen. Her laver Lucia Odoom og FKA Twigs et mixtape over de stemmer, der har været med til at forme hendes helt særlige lyd. Og det er folk lige fra Patti Smith til den ikoniske koreograf Pina Bausch. Redaktion: Lucia Odoom, Jonas Bach-Madsen og Sille Westphal. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Understanding vasopressors for CRNA interviews means going beyond what each drug does — interviewers want to know why it does it, at the receptor and cellular level. This episode walks through the mechanism of action for norepinephrine, epinephrine, phenylephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, and milrinone, tracing each drug from receptor binding through intracellular signaling to the clinical effect at the bedside. Want to go deeper on vasopressors? Try The CRNA Club FREE for 7 days — the learning library has a full vasopressor lesson with dosing, indications, and comparison framework. FREE RESOURCES TO HELP YOU ON YOUR CRNA JOURNEY:9-Step Application Checklist - Every step you need to apply to CRNA schoolCRNA School Database - Search and compare 140+ CRNA programsTranscript Analyzer - Find out if your GPA is competitive for CRNA schoolCertification Planner - Your personalized CCRN study planTimeline Generator - Build your personalized application timeline TIMESTAMPS[00:00] Why vasopressors come up in almost every CRNA interview [01:30] What receptor framework ties all vasopressors together? [04:00] How do alpha-1, beta-1, and beta-2 receptors work at the cellular level? [08:00] What makes norepinephrine first-line for septic shock? [10:00] Why does epinephrine raise lactate, and should you stop the drip? [12:00] What is vasopressin actually doing in septic shock? [14:00] Free resources for your CRNA journey Follow us on Instagram: @thecrnaclubMore resources at THECRNACLUB.COM

Bag om Københavnerhistorikerne er et supplement til Bag om København, og i denne udgave kan du møde idéhistoriker, forsker og forfatter Astrid Nonbo Andersen. Astrid Nonbo Andersen er denne måneds københavnerhistoriker. Hun arbejder bl.a. med kolonihistorie og erindringshistorie, og i hendes seneste bog 'Monumentet' kommer vi med på en tur gennem de kunstneriske og politiske miljøer i mellemkrigstiden, hvor mange af de forestillinger, som vi stadig møder om Grønland, blev skabt. For hvad er det for et monument, Grønlandsmonumentet på Christianshavns Torv? Hvorfor er det skabt? Hvad skal det fortælle? Sammen med Martine Lind Krebs har Astrid Nonbo Andersen afdækket forestillinger om Grønland i Danmark og blandt danskerne de sidste hundrede år. Bag om Københavnerhistorikerne er et møde med de mennesker, der skriver om eller i København. Fælles for dem er, at de er historiefortællere: Det er dem, der undersøger og skaber de fortællinger om København, som vi bruger til at blive klogere på byen og dens lange og mangesidede historie. Interviewer og tilrettelægger: Mai-Britt Tollund. Klippet sammen af: Mai-Britt Tollund og Berit Freyheit Se litteraturliste og tilhørende artikel her Facebook: Bag om Københavns podcast + nyhedsbrev Musikbidder er hentet fra FMA/Public Domain: Clouds by HoliznaCC0 & Narcissus smells like headache by Monplaisir Musikbidder er hentet fra FMA/Public Domain: Aaron Dunn - Minuet - Notebook for Anna Magdalena by Bach & Narcissus smells like headache by Monplaisir

Santa Barbara Talks: Ryder Christ, Santa Barbara's Street Interviewer, talks with Josh Molina about his transition from News Director at KEYT to man-on-the-street interviewer. Christ opens up about his questions, his character, his approach, his dress, his style and what he learned from John Palminteri. Christ is leading a wave of local social media personalities capturing eyeballs on the South Coast. Josh Molina is a journalist and college professor who creates dynamic conversations with celebrities, politicians, activities and experts in their field. Find more than 300 podcasts on this channel. Please follow and subscribe. Also visit SantaBarbaraTalks.com to contribute.

In deze zevende aflevering van ‘Boegbeelden & Bliktrekkers' staat het monumentale hart van de vereniging centraal: de sociëteit van de Koninklijke Roei- en Zeilvereeniging De Maas aan de Rotterdamse Nieuwe Maas. Presentator Erik Peekel gaat in gesprek met architect en oud-bestuurslid René Frijters, die verantwoordelijk was voor de grootschalige restauratie van de grote zaal.René neemt je mee door de geschiedenis van het gebouw sinds de opening in 1909: van Jugendstil-architectuur en eerdere verbouwingen tot het gebruik van de sociëteit als ontmoetingsplek, verenigingshart en evenementenlocatie. Hij vertelt hoe het gebouw zich door de jaren heen steeds aanpaste aan nieuwe wensen, zonder zijn karakter en betekenis te verliezen.In deze aflevering hoor je over:De architectonische ziel: Waarom het ontwerp van Hooijkaas en Brinkman de perfecte verbinding vormt tussen de stad Rotterdam en de Maas.Lagen van de tijd: De impact van eerdere verbouwingen, waaronder die van Van den Broek in 1937 en de uitbreiding door de bezetter.De renovatie in de praktijk: Hoe bouwkundig historisch onderzoek leidde tot het herstel van de grote zaal in haar volle glorie.Een boeiend gesprek over Rotterdams erfgoed, architectuur, monumentenzorg, verenigingsleven en de blijvende betekenis van de sociëteit van De Maas als verbindende plek tussen stad en water.Podcastmaker Rik BoumanThe Sociëteit of the Royal Rowing and Sailing Association de Maas, a venerable institution in Rotterdam, serves as the focal point of our discussion in this episode. Over the course of 175 years, this architectural gem has not only stood as a bastion of maritime heritage but has also facilitated a myriad of social interactions, decision-making processes, and community bonding. I, Erik Pekel, engage in a profound dialogue with architect René Freiters, who has played a pivotal role in the significant restoration of this historic edifice located at Veerdam 1. Through our conversation, we delve into the intricacies of the building's architectural features, the implications of its status as a national monument, and the challenges encountered during its meticulous restoration to ensure that it remains a vibrant venue for contemporary use while honoring its storied past. The episode encapsulates the essence of preserving cultural heritage amidst evolving societal dynamics, offering insights into the delicate balance between tradition and modernity that characterizes the continued relevance of this distinguished sociëteit.The episode presents a compelling exploration of the Sociëteit van de Koninklijke Roei en Zeilvereniging de Maas, a distinguished establishment that has played an integral role in Rotterdam's social and cultural fabric for 175 years. During my conversation with architect René Freiters, we traverse the rich history of this architectural gem, which has not only served as a venue for rowing and sailing but has also functioned as a critical nexus for decision-making and social interaction among the city's notable citizens. Freiters recounts his first encounter with the building, emphasizing the architectural qualities that captivated him and the profound sense of history that permeates its halls. We delve into the significance of the Sociëteit as a monument to resilience, particularly in light of the destruction faced by Rotterdam during World War II, which starkly contrasts with the survival of this remarkable structure. As our dialogue unfolds, we examine the extensive restoration efforts undertaken to preserve the Sociëteit's unique character while ensuring its relevance in the modern era. Freiters articulates the challenges faced during these renovations, including compliance with heritage conservation standards and the complexities involved in integrating contemporary infrastructure within a historical framework. He shares insights into the collaborative process that defined the restoration, highlighting the importance of engaging with skilled artisans and specialists to achieve a harmonious balance between historical fidelity and modern functionality. The conversation also reflects on the evolving role of such institutions in contemporary society, particularly how they must adapt to meet the needs of a diverse membership while remaining true to their foundational purpose. In conclusion, our discourse encapsulates the essence of the Sociëteit as a living testament to Rotterdam's heritage, inviting listeners to contemplate the responsibilities associated with preserving such cultural landmarks. Freiters emphasizes that the ongoing stewardship of the Sociëteit is not merely about maintaining a building; it is about nurturing a community and fostering connections that transcend generations. This episode ultimately serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring value of heritage preservation and the vital role that such spaces play in shaping our collective identity.Takeaways:The Sociëteit van de Koninklijke Roei en Zeilvereniging de Maas has been a prominent institution in Rotterdam for 175 years, serving as a vital nexus between the city and its waterways.Architect René Freiters emphasized the importance of the sociëteit's architectural heritage, detailing the building's unique Jugendstil characteristics and its historical significance in the context of post-war reconstruction.The extensive restoration project undertaken in 2009 aimed to preserve the sociëteit's original design while addressing modern usability and safety standards, highlighting the complexities of maintaining cultural heritage.Throughout its history, the sociëteit has evolved to adapt to the changing needs of its members, demonstrating a commitment to both tradition and innovation in the face of contemporary challenges.The podcast discusses the intricate processes involved in the restoration, including historical research and expert consultations, which ultimately led to the building's designation as a national monument.Future generations are encouraged to maintain a balance between preserving the sociëteit's storied past and embracing modern societal developments to ensure its continued relevance and vibrancy.

In deze zevende aflevering van ‘Boegbeelden & Bliktrekkers' staat het monumentale hart van de vereniging centraal: de sociëteit van de Koninklijke Roei- en Zeilvereeniging De Maas aan de Rotterdamse Nieuwe Maas. Presentator Erik Peekel gaat in gesprek met architect en oud-bestuurslid René Frijters, die verantwoordelijk was voor de grootschalige restauratie van de grote zaal.René neemt je mee door de geschiedenis van het gebouw sinds de opening in 1909: van Jugendstil-architectuur en eerdere verbouwingen tot het gebruik van de sociëteit als ontmoetingsplek, verenigingshart en evenementenlocatie. Hij vertelt hoe het gebouw zich door de jaren heen steeds aanpaste aan nieuwe wensen, zonder zijn karakter en betekenis te verliezen.In deze aflevering hoor je over:De architectonische ziel: Waarom het ontwerp van Hooijkaas en Brinkman de perfecte verbinding vormt tussen de stad Rotterdam en de Maas.Lagen van de tijd: De impact van eerdere verbouwingen, waaronder die van Van den Broek in 1937 en de uitbreiding door de bezetter.De renovatie in de praktijk: Hoe bouwkundig historisch onderzoek leidde tot het herstel van de grote zaal in haar volle glorie.Een boeiend gesprek over Rotterdams erfgoed, architectuur, monumentenzorg, verenigingsleven en de blijvende betekenis van de sociëteit van De Maas als verbindende plek tussen stad en water.Podcastmaker Rik BoumanThe Sociëteit of the Royal Rowing and Sailing Association de Maas, a venerable institution in Rotterdam, serves as the focal point of our discussion in this episode. Over the course of 175 years, this architectural gem has not only stood as a bastion of maritime heritage but has also facilitated a myriad of social interactions, decision-making processes, and community bonding. I, Erik Pekel, engage in a profound dialogue with architect René Freiters, who has played a pivotal role in the significant restoration of this historic edifice located at Veerdam 1. Through our conversation, we delve into the intricacies of the building's architectural features, the implications of its status as a national monument, and the challenges encountered during its meticulous restoration to ensure that it remains a vibrant venue for contemporary use while honoring its storied past. The episode encapsulates the essence of preserving cultural heritage amidst evolving societal dynamics, offering insights into the delicate balance between tradition and modernity that characterizes the continued relevance of this distinguished sociëteit.The episode presents a compelling exploration of the Sociëteit van de Koninklijke Roei en Zeilvereniging de Maas, a distinguished establishment that has played an integral role in Rotterdam's social and cultural fabric for 175 years. During my conversation with architect René Freiters, we traverse the rich history of this architectural gem, which has not only served as a venue for rowing and sailing but has also functioned as a critical nexus for decision-making and social interaction among the city's notable citizens. Freiters recounts his first encounter with the building, emphasizing the architectural qualities that captivated him and the profound sense of history that permeates its halls. We delve into the significance of the Sociëteit as a monument to resilience, particularly in light of the destruction faced by Rotterdam during World War II, which starkly contrasts with the survival of this remarkable structure. As our dialogue unfolds, we examine the extensive restoration efforts undertaken to preserve the Sociëteit's unique character while ensuring its relevance in the modern era. Freiters articulates the challenges faced during these renovations, including compliance with heritage conservation standards and the complexities involved in integrating contemporary infrastructure within a historical framework. He shares insights into the collaborative process that defined the restoration, highlighting the importance of engaging with skilled artisans and specialists to achieve a harmonious balance between historical fidelity and modern functionality. The conversation also reflects on the evolving role of such institutions in contemporary society, particularly how they must adapt to meet the needs of a diverse membership while remaining true to their foundational purpose. In conclusion, our discourse encapsulates the essence of the Sociëteit as a living testament to Rotterdam's heritage, inviting listeners to contemplate the responsibilities associated with preserving such cultural landmarks. Freiters emphasizes that the ongoing stewardship of the Sociëteit is not merely about maintaining a building; it is about nurturing a community and fostering connections that transcend generations. This episode ultimately serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring value of heritage preservation and the vital role that such spaces play in shaping our collective identity.Takeaways:The Sociëteit van de Koninklijke Roei en Zeilvereniging de Maas has been a prominent institution in Rotterdam for 175 years, serving as a vital nexus between the city and its waterways.Architect René Freiters emphasized the importance of the sociëteit's architectural heritage, detailing the building's unique Jugendstil characteristics and its historical significance in the context of post-war reconstruction.The extensive restoration project undertaken in 2009 aimed to preserve the sociëteit's original design while addressing modern usability and safety standards, highlighting the complexities of maintaining cultural heritage.Throughout its history, the sociëteit has evolved to adapt to the changing needs of its members, demonstrating a commitment to both tradition and innovation in the face of contemporary challenges.The podcast discusses the intricate processes involved in the restoration, including historical research and expert consultations, which ultimately led to the building's designation as a national monument.Future generations are encouraged to maintain a balance between preserving the sociëteit's storied past and embracing modern societal developments to ensure its continued relevance and vibrancy.

Her Dad Found a Rolex and Returned It. What That Taught Her About Asking for Everything. Her father came to the United States in 1989 with next to nothing. He found a Rolex in a locker room while working as a janitor and returned it. The owner gave him a job. He stayed 27 years. In that time, he asked his employer for a green card. They sponsored it. He asked for college tuition. They paid for his associate's and his bachelor's degree. He asked to pivot into chemistry. They made a role for it. Darlene Reina watched all of this and had one thought: if he could ask for all of that with nothing in his pocket and no English, why was she self-editing her ambitions? She stopped. Now she opens job interviews by telling the people who will decide whether to hire her exactly what she wants: to be CIO of an organization. She told her future boss. She told the Calendly interviewer. Both were supportive. She uses it as a filter. Darlene is Head of IT at Calendly, and in this episode she breaks down the frameworks she's built for speaking up, pitching ideas, and asking for exactly what she wants without apology. You'll learn: How to know which conversations are worth inserting yourself into, and which ones to let go based on span of control, stakeholder complexity, and how badly you want the outcome. The self-interest framework: why "selfless" leads to burnout, "selfish" kills collaboration, and the middle zone of self-interest is where real buy-in happens. Why she describes senior leadership as "glorified salespeople" and what changed when she stopped clicking on the backend and started selling visions instead. The "directionally correct" approach to numbers: why giving a C-suite executive "$270K plus or minus 20%" is infinitely more persuasive than "decreased time" or a 6-decimal-point calculation that took two weeks to produce. How self-editing language like "I think the answer might be..." quietly signals low confidence, and how to hit the delete button on it. Why she tells every interviewer exactly what she wants out of her career, and how she uses their response as a filter for whether the organization is actually a place where she can grow. About Darlene Reina: Head of IT at Calendly, Darlene has built her career at the intersection of technology leadership and organizational influence. Originally from a Venezuelan family in Rhode Island, she leads IT strategy and operations at one of the most widely used scheduling platforms in the world. She is candid, direct, and unabashedly ambitious. Connect with Darlene on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/darlene-reina/

Es ist einer der grössten Schweizer Medizin-Skandale der jüngeren Geschichte. In dessen Zentrum steht Francesco Maisano, der ehemalige Leiter der Herzchirurgie am Universitätsspital Zürich (USZ). Konkret sollen Patienten gefährdet worden sein, indem Maisano selbst entwickelte Implantate getestet und Komplikationen unterschlagen habe. Eine Untersuchung am USZ kommt nun zu einem erschütternden Schluss: Während Maisanos Amtszeit gab es statistisch gesehen rund 70 Todesfälle zu viel in der Herzchirurgie. Patientinnen und Patienten seien gefährdet worden, teilte das USZ am Dienstag mit. Der «Tages-Anzeiger» deckte den Fall vor rund sechs Jahren auf, gestützt auf Hinweise eines Whistleblowers. Seither bestreitet Maisano die Vorwürfe. Im Rahmen des aktuellen Untersuchungsberichts bestreitet er, individuell rechtlich verantwortlich zu sein für die beschriebenen Probleme. Catherine Boss und Roland Gamp vom Tamedia Recherchedesk haben die Vorwürfe gegen Maisano damals erstmals publik gemacht. In der neusten Folge des täglichen Podcasts «Apropos» erzählen sie, was der Bericht des USZ offenlegt und was dieser für die Medizinbranche und die Spitalführung bedeutet. Host: Alexandra Aregger Produzentin: Valeria Mazzeo Mehr zum Fall Maisano Skandal am Unispital: 70 tote Patienten zu viel an Zürcher Herzklinik Ein Bericht zeigt schwere Verfehlungen durch Ex-Klinikchef Francesco Maisano Whistleblower im Interview: Er deckte die Zürcher Herzklinik-Affäre auf Das sind die Hauptfiguren im Fall Maisano Apropos-Folge zum Fall des Berner Starchirurgen vor Gericht   Unser Tagi-Spezialangebot für Podcast-Hörer:innen: tagiabo.chHabt ihr Feedback, Ideen oder Kritik zu «Apropos»? Schreibt uns an podcasts@tamedia.ch Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In this reflection episode, Jocelynn takes off the "Interviewer" hat and steps into the "Coach's" seat. After modeling student consultations in Episode 11, she dives deep into the four core "Treasures" that were unearthed during those conversations. This isn't just about what was said—it's about how we as educators Reflect, Learn, and Implement the truth to build radical trust in our classrooms.The 4 Treasures Revealed:Connection Over Everything: Why the "Getting to Know You" worksheets we rely on often miss the mark, and what students actually crave instead.Scaffold, Scaffold, Scaffold: A look at how shifting our language from the abstract to the concrete (e.g., from "Mapping" to "Planning") unlocks the brilliance of every learner.Pause & Excavate: The power of the "Gold Statement." Why we must be willing to stop the script and "excavate" when a student shares a deep truth.Theory into Practice: Moving from the "How" to the "Do." How the Friday Lab and Co-Design routines turn student voice into the engine of classroom culture.What You'll Hear in This Episode:The Trust Loop: Understanding that it's not enough to know your students; they must know that they are known.Structured Independence: A tactical breakdown of the "Friday Lab" (Reader's/Writer's Workshop and Social Studies Lab) and how it creates the space for 1-on-1 advocacy.The Co-Design Lab: Defining the collaborative workspace where students become the architects of their own learning.Radical Grace: Reflections on the "simmer down" period and the necessity of processing our own emotions before advocating for change.Featured Resources:The First 10 Days: Building a Welcoming & Respectful Classroom of BelongingThe Student Connection Profile ToolCoaching Corner Highlights:Anchor Question: What are my students learning about themselves when I give them the space to plan?Implementation Intention: “This week, I will facilitate a Co-Design Lab during the last 20 minutes of class on Friday to brainstorm our next unit.”

My guest this week is one of Britain's most respected and fearless journalists. Cathy Newman spent twenty years at Channel 4 News, interviewed eight Prime Ministers, and broke some of the biggest stories of the last decade — including the investigation that led to the Archbishop of Canterbury resigning for the first time in history. She's just been named Journalist of the Year and Interviewer of the Year, and she's now embarking on an exciting new chapter at Sky News fronting her own show. But away from the headlines and the political interviews, who is Cathy Newman? What drives her, what has she sacrificed, and what does it feel like to be at this particular midpoint — leaving somewhere you've called home for two decades and stepping into something completely new? This is a really honest and fascinating conversation and I think you're going to enjoy it. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In deze zesde aflevering van ‘Boegbeelden & Bliktrekkers' staat de ultieme vrijheid van het zeezeilen centraal. Presentator Erik Peekel gaat in gesprek met zeezeilers Aad en Hella Twigt, die samen meer dan 200.000 zeemijlen aflegden en grote delen van de wereldzeeën bevoeren.Van hun eerste reis in 1974 zonder moderne communicatie tot het ronden van Kaap Hoorn met hun jonge dochters aan boord. Een gesprek over de ultieme vrijheid van de zee, de noodzakelijke discipline aan boord en de bijzondere opvoeding van hun kinderen op de oceaan.In deze aflevering hoor je over:De sprong in het diepe: Waarom Aad en Hella in 1974 alles achterlieten om met de Aldebaran de Atlantische Oceaan over te steken.Gezinsleven op de oceaan: Hoe Agnita en Alies opgroeiden als 'zeezigeuners' en de prestigieuze Daughters of Cape Horn Trophy wonnen.De psychologie van de lange reis: Wat is het geheim om jarenlang op een kleine oppervlakte de vrede te bewaren en stress te voorkomen?Een inspirerende aflevering over zeezeilen, wereldreizen, oceaanzeilen, gezinsleven aan boord en de tijdloze aantrekkingskracht van de zee.Podcastmaker Rik BoumanThe core of this podcast episode revolves around a compelling narrative of adventure, resilience, and the pursuit of freedom, as experienced by Aad and Hella Twicht, who have collectively navigated over 200,000 nautical miles. Their journey encompasses the crossing of oceans and the profound challenges faced while rounding Cape Horn with their young daughters aboard, a testament to their unwavering spirit and dedication to exploration. Throughout the conversation, we delve into their initial decision to abandon conventional life for the vast unknown of the seas, highlighting the pivotal moments that shaped their path and the reactions of those around them. The episode further explores the intricacies of family life on a sailboat, the lessons learned from both triumphs and tribulations, and the impact of their adventurous lifestyle on their daughters. Ultimately, their story serves as an inspiring reminder that the pursuit of one's dreams, despite the inevitable uncertainties, can yield a life rich in experiences and profound connections.Situated in the heart of Rotterdam, the Royal Rowing and Sailing Association de Maas stands as a venerable institution, bridging the city and its waterways for over 175 years. In this enlightening dialogue, I engage with Aad and Hella Twicht, two seasoned sailors who have traversed more than 200,000 nautical miles, including the formidable Cape Horn, while accompanied by their daughters. Their narratives not only recount epic voyages but also delve into the profound transformations that sailing has instigated in their lives, fundamentally altering their perspectives on freedom, adventure, and familial bonds. A poignant aspect of their sailing odyssey is the evolution of their family dynamics, particularly as they embarked on a second, more ambitious journey in 1986 with their children. This familial expedition not only entailed navigating treacherous waters but also necessitated a re-evaluation of their educational approaches, as Hella took on the mantle of educator amidst the vastness of the sea. The children grew up learning the value of teamwork and adaptability, a testament to the unique upbringing afforded by their maritime lifestyle. Through trials and triumphs, the Twichts' story encapsulates the essence of pursuing one's dreams, underscoring that the pursuit of adventure is often fraught with uncertainty yet immensely rewarding.Takeaways:The Royal Rowing and Sailing Society de Maas, located in the heart of Rotterdam, serves as a remarkable symbol of the city's connection to water, enduring for 175 years.Aad and Hella Twicht have navigated over 200,000 nautical miles, demonstrating exceptional resilience and adventurous spirit with their daughters aboard diverse voyages.The decision to embark on a significant sailing journey arose from a desire for freedom and exploration, leading them to leave conventional life behind.Their initial voyage was fraught with challenges, including navigating without modern technology, highlighting the complexity of maritime adventures in the past.The couple's journey towards Cape Horn highlights their determination and the unpredictability of ocean travel, showcasing the interplay between preparation and spontaneity.The impact of climate change on their sailing experiences reflects a broader environmental concern, as they note changes in wind patterns and storm frequency over the decades.

For this episode, let's revisit a Case Interview & Management Consulting classic where we talk about the importance of you, the candidate, never ever giving the interviewer the benefit of the doubt, why this is vital, how to do this in a case and the improvement it will immediately deliver. The main value of adopting this mindset is that you tend to explain everything to the interviewer because you assume he is not aware of all the answers. If you enter an interview, assuming the interview is "perfect", you will tend to make assumptions which hurt your chances and damage your image.   Here are some free gifts for you: Overall Approach Used in Well-Managed Strategy Studies free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/OverallApproach McKinsey & BCG winning resume free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/resumepdf Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo

In this episode, Leon Carroll Jr, former NCIS Special Agent discusses the "Ghosts of Sicily", set for release today April 14, 2026. The book uncovers the true story of the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) forming an alliance with the Mafia, including Charles "Lucky" Luciano, during WWII to protect U.S. waterfronts from Nazi spies and U-boats. It follows ONI agents on missions in America and Italy, involving secret meetings with criminals and undercover operations, and is the third in their Ghosts of... series. Interview date Wednesday, 18 March 2026. Interviewer and Host AFIO President Emeritus James Hughes.

In deze vijfde aflevering van ‘Boegbeelden & Bliktrekkers' staat één van de meest succesvolle Nederlandse roeisters van haar generatie centraal: Marieke Keijser. Presentator Erik Peekel gaat met haar in gesprek over haar uitzonderlijke loopbaan in de roeisport, van jeugdtalent tot Olympisch podium.Marieke neemt je mee langs haar vroege successen, waaronder wereldtitels bij de junioren en het WK onder 23, en haar indrukwekkende prestaties op EK's en WK's. Het hoogtepunt vormt haar deelname aan de Olympische Spelen van Tokio, waar zij samen met Ilse Paulis als favoriet startte in de lichte dubbeltwee. Ze vertelt openhartig over presteren onder druk, omgaan met verwachtingen en de lessen die topsport haar heeft gebracht.In deze aflevering hoor je over:De weg naar de top: Hoe Marieke als jong talent bij De Maas begon en werd gecoacht door Thomas Notermans.Tokio 2020: De spanning van de lichte dubbeltwee, het roeien in coronatijd en wat die laatste 250 meter haar hebben geleerd over topsport.De toekomst is Coastal: Waarom de nieuwe discipline Coastal Rowing de roeisport verandert en of we Marieke terugzien op de Spelen van Los Angeles 2028.Een inspirerende aflevering over topsport, Olympisch roeien, coastal rowing en de allesomvattende passie voor de roeisport.Podcastmaker Rik BoumanThe discussion centers around the illustrious career of Marieke Keijzer, an esteemed Olympic rower, and her profound connection to the sport, particularly as it flourished within the context of Rotterdam's renowned rowing community. I, Erik Peekel, engage Marieke in a detailed exploration of her journey, commencing with her remarkable victory at the Under-23 World Championships in 2016. This triumph not only solidified her status as a world champion but also underscored the emotional significance of competing in her hometown, surrounded by family and friends. Throughout our dialogue, we delve into the intricate dynamics of competitive rowing, the pressures associated with public expectation, and the transformative impact of mentorship in her development as an athlete. As Marieke transitions into the evolving realm of coastal rowing, we contemplate the future of this captivating sport, particularly its inclusion in the Olympic Games, and the unique challenges it poses to athletes.The Sociëteit van de Koninklijke Roei- en Zeilvereniging de Maas stands as a venerable institution in Rotterdam, embodying a rich history of 175 years that seamlessly intertwines the city with its waters. In this enlightening dialogue, I engage with Marieke Keijzer, an esteemed Olympian and world champion in rowing, delving into her formative experiences that shaped her illustrious career. Our conversation embarks with a poignant recollection of the Under 23 World Championships in 2016, held in her hometown of Rotterdam, where she triumphed in the lightweight single scull category. Marieke vividly recounts the electric atmosphere of the event, her pride in representing her city, and the emotional resonance of competing on the very waters where her grandfather had once laid the foundations for her journey. The narrative unfolds further as we explore the intricacies of the pressures associated with being a public figure in sports, particularly the balance between external expectations and internal motivations that can shape an athlete's performance. Marieke eloquently expresses the notion that the most formidable pressure often emanates not from the spectators, but from within oneself, highlighting the profound psychological landscape that competitive athletes navigate.Takeaways:The Sociëteit van de Koninklijke Roei- en Zeilvereniging de Maas has been an emblematic institution in Rotterdam for 175 years, symbolizing the city's rich maritime heritage.Marieke Keijzer's experience as a world champion at the 2016 U23 World Championships in Rotterdam highlighted the profound connection between her achievements and her family's legacy in rowing.The journey from a casual interest in rowing to becoming an elite athlete is often shaped by early exposure and the influence of family, as demonstrated by Marieke's transition into competitive rowing.Marieke emphasizes that the pressures of external expectations are often eclipsed by one's internal drive, underscoring the importance of self-motivation in the pursuit of athletic excellence.

Candidates prefer AI Interviews? Candidate Experience for Different Demographic Cohorts   AI interviewing isn't the future - it's the now.   From one-way video screens to conversational chatbots, candidates are increasingly meeting algorithms before they meet humans. But here's what nobody's asking: does a Gen Z grad feel the same way about a bot interviewer as a mid-career professional?   Does a neurodivergent candidate experience relief or anxiety? Are underrepresented groups finding equity -or erasure - in automated screening?   We're diving deep into the demographic divide nobody's measuring.   In this session, we'll unpack: • Do younger candidates actually prefer AI screens, or is that a myth? • How do gender differences show up in AI interview comfort levels? • What do candidates with disabilities really think about voice-analysis tools? • Are multilingual candidates disadvantaged by English-first AI systems? • Does AI reduce bias for candidates of color—or encode new barriers? • How do socioeconomic backgrounds shape "digital interview readiness"? • What makes veterans trust (or distrust) algorithmic evaluation? • Are remote rural candidates leveling up or getting left behind? • How do parenting status and career gaps interact with AI screening? • Which demographics are quietly dropping out of your AI funnel?   Recruiters, HR leaders, TA innovators - this one's for you We're with Kevin Grossman, Oana Iordachescu, Yaz Dalal and friends, on Friday 10th April, 2pm GMT / 7 am PT / 3pm CET. Follow the channel here (recommended) and register on 'Save my Spot' for reserve your spot.   Episode 372 is sponsored by Joveo   As the global leader in AI-powered, high-performance recruitment marketing, Joveo is transforming talent attraction and recruitment media buying for the world's largest employers, staffing firms, RPOs, and media agencies. The Joveo platform enables businesses to attract, source, engage, and hire the best candidates on time and within budget.   Powering millions of jobs every day, Joveo's AI-led recruitment marketing platform uses advanced data science and machine learning to dynamically manage and optimize talent sourcing and applications across all online channels, while providing real-time insights at every step of the job seeker journey, from click to hire. For more information about Joveo's award-winning platform and solutions, visit www.joveo.com.

In this episode, Dr. Howland plays a little role reversal and is interviewed on his own podcast by guest and friend Cindy Mudge. They talk about The Atheist's Prayer, relationships, and much more. You will enjoy this episode with a little different spin than normal!

Are you walking into biotech panel interviews and talking to every person the same way? That approach can cost you the offer, even if your science is solid.In this episode, Carina Clingman and returning guest Stacey Tannenbaum, PhD break down how to build rapport with each type of interviewer you'll meet on a panel day, from the VP who hasn't read your CV to the peer scientist who feels threatened by what you bring to the table.In this episode, you'll learn how to:Talk to senior leaders about strategic impact instead of getting stuck in technical detailsShow hiring managers you want this specific role, not just any job, and why that distinction is the number one thing they evaluateRecognize the three reasons peer interviewers become skeptics: fear of change, territorial expertise, and feeling intimidated by what they don't understandUse empathy, curiosity, and "I need your help" to turn resistant colleagues into alliesFrame your science in terms that matter to cross-functional interviewers from other departmentsAsk better questions at every stage to make interviews feel like a two-way conversationLeverage your hiring manager as an ally to get intel on difficult personalities before you walk in the roomUse presentation techniques like reading facial expressions, spotting "thought bubbles," and asking for feedback to build real connection during job talksStacey has spent 20+ years leading teams in pharmacometrics at companies including Astellas, Metrum Research Group, and Novartis. She's sat on both sides of the interview table and now coaches scientists and technical professionals on communication and leadership through her consultancy, SJTPharm LLC.Whether you're preparing for your first biotech panel interview or your tenth, this episode gives you a practical playbook for winning over every person in the room.Connect with Stacey: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stacey-tannenbaum-phd-fisop/Learn more about the Collaboratory Career Hub community and access our free resources:Join our Skool CommunityTake the Free 7-day Interview Sprint ChallengeCheck out our sister podcast: Building BiotechsSend Carina a connection request on LinkedIn!Stay connected with us:

Send us Fan MailMost hiring processes don't filter for performance. They filter for interview skill. In this episode, Josh Matthews breaks down the five silent killers that cause companies to reject their best candidates before an offer is ever made, joined by co-host Scott Stafford.What you'll learn:• Why unstructured interviews predict job performance only 20% of the time• How interviewers form snap judgments in 10 seconds and spend the rest confirming them• The real cost of giving veto power to untrained interviewers• Why long-tenured candidates get hurt by interview anxiety while job-hoppers sail through• How vague winner criteria and moving goalposts eliminate great people• A specific script candidates can use to disarm interviewer bias mid-conversation• What conscientiousness actually looks like before the interview even startsDrawing on Google hiring research, University of Toledo studies, and years of frontline recruiting experience, this episode makes the case that most companies aren't just making bad hires. They're systematically rejecting their best ones.The Hiring Edge is for hiring managers, talent leaders, and professionals who want to build better teams and advance their careers. Hosted by Josh Matthews, President of Salesforce Staffing, LLC and ranked the #1 Salesforce Recruiter, globally.Follow on Apple Podcasts or Spotify and leave a five-star review.

Interviewer info Lyssa Rome is a speech-language pathologist in the San Francisco Bay Area. She is on staff at the Aphasia Center of California, where she facilitates groups for people with aphasia and their care partners. She owns an LPAA-focused private practice and specializes in working with people with neurogenic communication disorders. She has worked in acute hospital, skilled nursing, and continuum of care settings. Prior to becoming an SLP, Lyssa was a public radio journalist, editor, and podcast producer. In this episode, Lyssa Rome interviews Jessica Obermeyer about group treatment for aphasia. Guest info Jessica Obermeyer, PhD, CCC-SLP, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Her area of specialization is acquired adult neurogenic language disorders. Dr. Obermeyer's research interests include discourse production in aphasia, treatment efficacy, and the cognitive requirements of language production. Prior to earning her doctorate, she worked in a variety of clinical settings where she specialized in assessment and treatment of adult neurogenic populations.     Listener Take-aways In today's episode you will: ● Recognize the role of written communication in clients' daily activities, including texting, email, and online tasks. ● Adapt ARCS-W treatment components to match each client's preferred writing modality (handwriting vs. typing). ● Identify candidates with aphasia who are well-suited for discourse-level writing treatment. Lyssa Rome Welcome to the Aphasia Access Aphasia Conversations Podcast. I'm Lyssa Rome. I'm a speech language pathologist on staff at the Aphasia Center of California, and I see clients with aphasia and other neurogenic communication disorders in my LPAA-focused private practice. I'm also a member of the Aphasia Access Podcast Working Group. Aphasia Access strives to provide members with information, inspiration, and ideas that support their aphasia care through a variety of educational materials and resources. I'm today's host for an episode that will feature Dr. Jessica Obermeyer, who was selected as a 2024 Tavistock Trust for Aphasia, Distinguished Scholar, USA and Canada. Dr. Obermeyer is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Her area of specialization is acquired adult neurogenic language disorders. Dr Obermeyer's research interests include discourse production and aphasia treatment efficacy and the cognitive requirements of language production. Prior to earning her doctorate, she worked in a variety of clinical settings, where she specialized in assessment and treatment of adult neurogenic populations. Jessica Obermeyer, welcome to the podcast, and thanks for being here. Jessica Obermeyer Thank you. It's a pleasure. Lyssa Rome So I wanted to get started with a question we often ask, which is: How did you get into this? Was there an aha moment for you and what led you to research aphasia? Jessica Obermeyer That's a great question. I think it was more of a slow awakening and journey to realizing that this is how I wanted to spend my days. When I started studying speech language pathology, I knew I wanted to work in adult rehab with people with traumatic brain injury, stroke, and aphasia. But as an undergraduate and a masters student, I worked on a lot of research related to traumatic brain injury and cognition. But then I had some exposure to aphasia research, and as a clinician, I just loved working with people that had aphasia. I loved running aphasia groups. I started aphasia groups, and when I decided to go back for my PhD, that is what I wanted to focus on. I also had the opportunity to work in adult outpatient, so I got to see a lot of people that had aphasia and were at different points in their rehabilitation journey. And those experiences just made me want to continue and especially do research that could develop and evaluate different treatment approaches for people that had aphasia. Lyssa Rome One of the sort of through lines in your research has been discourse. And I'm curious about how you landed on that as the focus of your work, why discourse? Jessica Obermeyer It's how we talk. It was always, you know, something I was interested in. I think, as a clinician, I felt really daunted by discourse, because it is laborious, you know, it takes a lot of time to think about how you're going to analyze it. But I was always so fascinated by all the linguistic components that make up discourse as a clinician. And then I think as a researcher, I really appreciate how important it is. Everything we do in our day to day lives is often at a discourse level, and that looks so different depending on the type of discourse. So your text exchange is discourse, your emails, your conversations, the interaction with a barista. You know, every kind of functional way that we communicate is often at a discourse level. But it's so different depending on what that interaction looks like, and that's just endlessly fascinating to me as a researcher… challenging but fascinating. Lyssa Rome Challenging both to evaluate and, I guess, to some extent, to treat. One of the things that I really appreciate is that it's how we communicate in our daily lives, and so if we're thinking about life participation and sort of functional approaches to treatment, to my mind, discourse is kind of where it's at. So I'm really excited to get to talk to you more about it. So speaking of discourse, I thought we could talk about your work on ARCS. Maybe we could start by telling us a little bit about the origins and how you became involved in researching. Jessica Obermeyer Yes, I'd be happy to. I started doing research with ARCS as a doctoral student. So it's been a long time, but the origin of ARCS, or Attentive Reading with Constrained Summarization, started with Yvonne Rogalski and Lisa Edmonds, and they published the first paper, I think, in 2009, but someone should go back to check that, and it was originally for someone that had primary progressive aphasia. And then there was another paper published for two people with Wernicke's aphasia. So in the original version, it's based on constrained summarization, and constrained only in that you're giving someone guidelines for how to summarize so they have to read through a segment of text. Usually it's a current event article, but clinically, you could use pretty much any written text. And I've actually done it with someone listening as well. Typically with ARCS, you would have someone read a segment of written text and then summarize it with the constraint or guideline to be specific. So avoid words like it, stuff, thing, he, she. So use that really intentional word retrieval. That's not what we typically do. We often use non-specific words, but it's that therapeutic, like try to go for the really precise and specific word exercise that retrieval and to also stay on topic, so try not to add a tangent, or, you know, additional information that's not related to what you're reading. And then in my work, I've added an additional guideline that's just based on what that person needs. So if they're repeating a lot, then that might be part of the guideline. Often, the guideline is to try to include the essential information that you've identified already. So that's the origin of ARCS. And as a doctoral student, I really wanted to do treatment research. I became really interested in cooperative learning theory, in how people can work together in their learning, collaborate to improve learning. And when I was doing that, reading and thinking about cooperative learning, writing seemed like such an excellent tool for that, because I think one of the hard things about spoken language is that it's just gone. You say it, it's gone. It's very hard to monitor, which I'm acutely aware of right now in this recording. But with written text, you have this wonderful record of what you've produced, and that can be really helpful for thinking about language and planning, especially in an approach like ARCS or ARCS-W that emphasizes this planning, process-driven component, where you're thinking about, "What do I need to include in this discourse? What's important? What's not important? And what have I actually produced? Does that meet, you know, the guidelines I've tried to meet?" So that's how writing actually got pulled into it. And I wanted to keep the spoken language because, I don't know that I've ever met someone with aphasia who told me they didn't want to continue exercising their spoken language, but the writing was just I think, an important addition, because there are so few written discourse treatment options. And it allowed for this emphasis on monitoring and planning and some of the cognitive components of discourse that can be hard to address. Lyssa Rome And maybe you could say a little bit about what you found when you've studied ARCS-W, so the Attentive Reading and Constrained Summarization-Written. Jessica Obermeyer Well, people have improved, which is great. So the one of the things about ARCS and ARCS-W that's maybe unique when we think about aphasia treatment as a whole, is that it's not a treatment with trained items, so no items are repeated. You're working on the process of discourse production, this process of monitoring and trying to be specific, be efficient, you know. In written discourse, people have made improvements in correct information units or CIUs. So at the word level in discourse, the amount of informative and correct information that they're producing, people have made improvements at the utterance level, where they're producing more relevant utterances and more utterances that have a basic sentence structure, and then this hasn't been looked at in all of the studies, but for some of the participants, where we've measured things like main concepts, the amount that the person is conveying the main ideas or concepts in the discourse has improved for some people as well. And then at this spoken discourse. So ARCS-W, it's half spoken, half written. Basically, people have also made similar improvements. So it's been encouraging so far, ARCS-W I would say, compared to ARCS is for people in the more mild aphasia end of the spectrum, especially with the writing component. Any clinician who's worked with people with aphasia will know that writing is often a stressful thing for people with aphasia. So it's for people that are writing at a phrase level already. It doesn't mean that their spelling is perfect, but if they're really struggling to get out a single word, this is probably not the ideal you know treatment for them, but for folks that are more on the mild end who want to work on spoken and written discourse, we have seen some positive results in their spoken and written discourse production. Another thing that I think is really important for this treatment is that it is so multi-modality. When we write normally, we're reading as well. You know, we're not just writing in a vacuum. A lot of the time. We're rereading our text, we are reading that text message and then responding to it. So I like that. I like multi-modality treatments. I like that this is a treatment that allows people to address multiple types of language goals, while, you know, keeping it pretty simple and low tech. Lyssa Rome I think that that really hits on one of the reasons that I like using ARCS-W in my work with people is that It can be used with so many different kinds of texts. So I've used both, you know, work emails, if their goal is to get back to work, newspaper articles that interest them, simplified newspaper articles that interest there's so many possibilities. And anyway, it's exciting to hear you talk about that. Jessica Obermeyer Yeah, I think that as a clinician, that's why I liked ARCS. It was so flexible, so easy to implement. And that's definitely one of the things I like about ARCS-W as well. Make treatment work hard for you. Lyssa Rome So that is interesting to people as well. Where are you going next with your ARCS research? Jessica Obermeyer Great question. I'm writing up results from about six people we ran over the last couple years, so that, I hope, gets submitted for publication soon. And I would really like to adapt this treatment a little further to use more assistive technology for folks that are really wanting to write, but aren't wedded to handwriting or typing in a traditional sense. So can we use speech-to-text? I always mix it up. And can we use methods to support people producing written language that are, you know, different than just typing it? Because people have really different needs in their life. So if that is a way to meet their writing needs, excellent, and I'd like to do that in the future. Lyssa Rome I think that gets back to this idea that it's so flexible, right? You could adapt it in so many different ways. I think that that's really exciting, because it sort of further underscores the flexibility of this approach. And we were talking earlier, before we started recording, about using the same ARCS framework, or ARCS-W framework for material that clients have listened to, things like podcasts or TED Talks. So it seems like it's so adaptable, which is part of what I think makes it really exciting. Jessica Obermeyer I think that's a great idea. We actually did use listening and then summarization for one of the participants in the first arc study, because that met their profile. That's how they wanted to interact with the treatment, and it worked out really well for them, and it's a great way to incorporate people's different interests. Not everyone wants to read, so being able to listen is a great option. And in the treatment for everybody, they always select their writing modality so they can either hand write or type, depending on what's relevant for them. In the population of people that have aphasia now, and I know that this will change over time, people have really different comfort levels with technology and with typing. So if someone says, "No, I never typed. I want to handwrite," then we can do that. And if, if it's the other, we can type. So I think listening is just another way to make it meet someone's needs better. Lyssa Rome I was hoping that you could talk a little bit more about the similarities and differences between different types of discourse. So spoken and written discourse, typed and versus handwritten discourse. Tell us a little bit more about that. Jessica Obermeyer Yeah, of course. Well, I should, I guess, start off by saying, working on the ARCS-W treatment research, I recognized just how little information is out there on written discourse and the majority of discourse measures that we use in aphasiology are based on spoken discourse production. But there are differences in how we speak versus how we write. So in spoken language, we've already talked a little bit about this, it's temporal, it's just gone. So writing is tangible. You have a record of your writing, and that can be really beneficial for people with aphasia. But of course, there's there's other things that can make writing more challenging as well. With spoken language, of course, we have the suprasegmental components of what we're saying. So we have our tone and our facial expression and things that allow us to impart meaning without actually saying it, and we don't have that in writing. Although things are shifting with text messaging technologies, we can add emojis and memes that help us communicate information. But I think when we're thinking about traditional writing, it doesn't have those additional components, and therefore people have to be more explicit with their word choice and a little more clear in what they're trying to say. People are often more efficient in writing. They use fewer words than they would in speaking. So those are some of the differences. We can't automatically correct our written output because we see that our partner doesn't understand. Because in writing, there's this distance between when we're writing versus when we think someone's reading it. Even in more instant platforms like text messaging, we don't know exactly when someone's reading something or how their face looks when they read it, in the way we know with speaking. So those differences do impact how we complete the task. And of course, the context of writing changes it dramatically. So you write notes to yourself really differently than you write a research paper or a work email. And that's not so different from speaking, right? The context is still going to impact how we speak or write, very much. So in my work, I've looked at how writing and typing are the same or different. And this is a pretty new area. There's a couple papers out there on it now, and I think it's gaining traction, which is great, because most people write through typing in their daily life now. What I found is that at a group level, it's pretty similar. Writing and typing look pretty similar for people that have aphasia. But individually it can be very different. So an individual person with aphasia might have a strength or weakness in handwriting versus typing for lots of different possible reasons, like their experience, or hemiparesis, their desire to do one or the other. But it's not, the patterns aren't completely clear. I think clinicians are probably really used to hearing that every individual with aphasia has the potential to be different. So I think that keeps with written and typed language output, handwritten and typed. Some of my recent work has been related to looking at different writing modalities for people with aphasia. So are there differences in their handwritten versus typed discourse production. There's a couple papers out on this now, and hopefully there'll be even more as it gains traction. And I think it's getting more attention in the research literature because of how important writing is in our daily lives now. I mean, most activities of daily living are now completed through, you know, the virtual world, so banking, shopping, lots of messaging are completed through reading and writing now. So that's kind of why I became interested in also working with ARCS-W and having people handwrite versus type, depending on their interest and comfort level. It was always interesting to me why certain people picked one or the other, and kind of what I was seeing. There is some research out there that shows that handwriting is advantageous for learning. So the specificity of how we're moving our fingers to create letters is helpful for retention and learning items, but when we're thinking at the discourse level, when we're not using the same items necessarily, things could potentially be a little different. So I was interested in just exploring some of those differences and patterns that might emerge, and if there was anything I could figure out that might be driving a pattern. So if someone's better at typing than handwriting, is there a reason that they're better? So what I have found so far, and it's it's pretty preliminary, is that at the group level, handwriting and typing look very similar for people with aphasia, so oftentimes, there's not a big difference in the total words that they produce, and that's been confirmed by a larger study as well from Jaime Lee and colleagues. But then when we look at the individual level, that's when you can start to see differences. And I don't think any clinician would be surprised to hear that people with Aphasia are variable or different. So we know that that is common, but it's been pretty interesting and striking in my own work to see how at the group level, these differences just totally even out. But then when we look at individuals, you do see that, you know, someone is more proficient with typing, someone else is more proficient with handwriting. So in a study I did, I think from 2024, we had people fill out this historical information about their typing experience and exposure, we knew about if they had a hemiparesis or not, and so were they able to use both hands or one hand for handwriting or typing? And like I said, we did find these individual differences for some people, but there wasn't a really clear pattern in what was driving those differences? Was it that they hadn't worked with a keyboard a lot? Was it that they only had the use of one hand? And we just didn't have enough data potentially to discern any specific patterns? Lyssa Rome We've talked a little bit about different types of discourse, written, spoken for written, typed versus handwritten. But I wanted to kind of come back to how we measure and analyze discourse, and wanted to ask about a more recent paper and have you describe a little bit about your work on discourse measurement and training clinicians to measure discourse? Jessica Obermeyer That paper is a perceptual rating paper. We've talked a lot about discourse in this chat, and I think probably one of the first things I might have mentioned was how daunting discourse analysis can be. So researchers are aware of that, and always kind of thinking that discourse is so rich, it provides us so much information about someone's linguistic ability, but also their success with communication in a way that other levels of language don't necessarily tell us. So how can we benefit from that rich information in a way that clinicians can do. Because with discourse analysis, you know, in the clinical session, it might not take that long. You're having someone participate in 10 minutes of conversation—that is not a lot of time in your session. The time is all backlogged. The time is after the session is over, and you're trying to transcribe what they've said and then identify discourse measures that you're interested in. And another thing that makes discourse just complex and dynamic is that there's not one measure, you know, there's not a measure of word retrieval and discourse. There are lots of measures that can give you insight into word retrieval and discourse. So this project I did with my collaborator, Marion Lehman, who also works on discourse, and especially conversation. We wanted to see if it was possible to train people to rate conversation samples from people with aphasia on linguistic measures, so measures of language ability. So there are other perceptual rating scales, but a lot of them might be looking at speech acts like initiation or presence or absence of errors. And we were really interested in if these, if perceptual ratings, could map on to the things we're doing in our labs, so you know, correct information units or the degree of informativeness, utterances that have basic structure, coherence, you know, these measures that we are spending many hours, you know, coding line by line, or even word by word, for some. So she and I developed this training and introduced—so the paper that's published, we used research assistants in our research labs, and we exposed them to the linguistic measures that we were interested in. Had them watch some practice videos, and then told them how we had coded them. So what was the value based on our lab coding? And then we did five test samples, so there were four linguistic measures. The training lasted about three hours, and I did five test samples. And we got some really good feedback from the RAs who did the training and rating samples. We had some promising results for especially two of the measures that we used in their training, and now we're really interested in extending that work with clinicians. So the people that were in the study before had very limited experience listening to people that had aphasia. They hadn't worked with people that had aphasia, they hadn't done extensive clinical training. We're hopeful that if we can use their feedback to fine tune the training and rating procedures and recruit some clinicians to participate, that hopefully we could get even better results and hopefully provide a tool to clinicians where they can be thinking about linguistic components of conversation in a way that's more feasible to their schedule and their workload, because we recognize how much time it takes. And I think it's, it's just a barrier to entry, even, because if someone is feeling like, "I can't do this, I don't have time to do this," then it's hard to even learn about or get started. Lyssa Rome Yeah, I'm so happy to hear that you're that you're focused on the feasibility for clinicians who have productivity requirements, who don't necessarily have a lot of time at the end of the day to do that kind of really in depth analysis. I think it's exciting. Jessica Obermeyer Oh, for sure, and clinicians, I think, work a lot of extra hours, but they have a whole caseload, you know, so balancing everybody's needs and being able to to provide excellent care to everybody is, is always a challenge, and hopefully, hopefully we'll, we'll be able to continue this work. We're trying to get some funding for the project because we want to be able to pay SLPs who participate in the research. Lyssa Rome As we start to wrap up, I'm wondering what you would like clinicians who are listening to this podcast to take away from what we've talked about today, from your work. Jessica Obermeyer I think one takeaway would be for clinicians to think about incorporating handwriting and typing into their existing treatment practice. So I've talked a lot about ARCS-W. ARCS-W is not for everybody. It is a very specific treatment approach for people that have mild aphasia who want to work on discourse-level writing. But there are so many ways to have people engage with handwriting and typing that will serve them in their daily life. So we've talked a lot about how literacy is just such a big—it's a bigger part of our lives than it was 20 years ago. People can achieve a lot of independence and autonomy if they're able to interact with reading and writing and complete it successfully. So I would really encourage clinicians to think about how they can incorporate reading and writing into their existing treatment. A study I was involved with— Liz Madden surveyed SLPs on their practices assessing and treating reading and writing, and one of the take-homes from that project was that clinicians evaluate writing more than treating it. And especially handwriting, versus typing. But I think that given the way society is moving, asking people like, "What's important for you, handwriting or typing?" and let's make that our practice. Lyssa Rome I appreciate how person centered and flexible that advice is right. We're trying to meet people where they're at and recognizing that our treatment can be tailored to the person who's sitting in front of us. I'm curious to hear what is coming next for you. What are you excited about in your work? Jessica Obermeyer That's actually a great segue about how we can tailor treatment, because that is one of the projects that I'm working on now, how we can think about treatment in terms of what are the things that make it work, versus things that maybe aren't essential components of the treatment? With the last study I did with ARCS-W of the things that we were really trying to understand better was: Did it matter if people hand wrote or typed? Did they have the same kind of level of generalization to the other writing modality? And in that study, it doesn't seem that they did. And I think there's really specific reasons for that, because we're working at this discourse level without repeated items. And so you might not see the same impact of that handwriting learning boost, because we're not repeating things as often. That's one of my real interests is thinking about how we work on treatment, how we deliver treatment, how clinicians can deliver treatment. Because I am very guilty of this. Working on writing takes a long time. It takes a long time for people with aphasia to produce written discourse level text. So in the ARCS W studies, it's an hour-and-a-half treatment session where we only work on ARCS-W. But I know I recognize that that's like not most clinicians' daily life, and it doesn't mirror what therapy many people with aphasia receive. So thinking about treatment in a more component-based and mechanistic way that makes it easier for clinicians to adapt to their their practice is is one of the things I would like to flesh out in the future. And then continuing to work on this training and perceptual rating protocol. One of the things my colleagues and I would like to do is create a training that can be shared freely, where clinicians can easily get access to it, and then collect more robust data. I mean, only if we get good results, of course. If we don't, we will not be sharing it. But those are the big things I'm thinking about in the next couple of years, and then beyond that, even more. Lyssa Rome Well, I look forward to reading more of your work and to seeing what comes next as well. Dr. Jessica Obermeyer, thanks so much for talking with us. I really appreciate it. Jessica Obermeyer It's been a pleasure. Thank you. Lyssa Rome And thanks also to our listeners for the references and resources mentioned in today's show. Please see our show notes. They're available on our website, www.aphasiaaccess.org. There, you can also become a member of our organization, browse our growing library of materials and find out about the Aphasia Access Academy. If you have an idea for a future podcast episode, email us at info@aphasiaaccess.org. Thanks again for your ongoing support of Aphasia Access. For Aphasia Access Conversations, I'm Lyssa Rome. Resources Obermeyer, J. (2024). Using and modifying standardized restorative treatments in aphasia: Clinician perspectives. American Journal of Speech‑Language Pathology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00349 Obermeyer, J., Leaman, M., & Oleson, J. (2025). Feasibility and preliminary data for a training protocol and perceptual rating scale of linguistic conversation measures in aphasia. American Journal of Speech‑Language Pathology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00420 Obermeyer, J. A., Rogalski, Y., & Edmonds, L. A. (2021). Attentive reading with constrained summarization-written, a multi-modality discourse-level treatment for mild aphasia. Aphasiology, 35(1), 100-125. Obermeyer, J. A., & Edmonds, L. A. (2018). Attentive reading with constrained summarization adapted to address written discourse in people with mild aphasia. American Journal of Speech‑Language Pathology, 27(1S), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0200 Obermeyer, J. A., Leaman, M. C., & Edmonds, L. A. (2020). Evaluating change in the conversation of a person with mild aphasia after Attentive Reading with Constrained Summarization–Written treatment. American Journal of Speech‑Language Pathology, 29(3), 1618–1628. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00078 Obermeyer, J., Edmonds, L., & Morgan, J. (2024). Handwritten and typed discourse in people with aphasia: Reference data for sequential picture description and comparison of performance across modality. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 33(6S), 3170-3185  

In this episode, retired CIA Clandestine Service officer and former Marine Barry Broman discusses his 2026 novel The Spy from Golden Valley. This latest historical novel continues the story from Broman's first two novels, The Spy from Place Saint-Sulpice and The Spy from Sukhumvit Road. Protagonist CIA Case Officer and ace recruiter Richard "Rick" Blayne is back and this time as a chief of station in Rangoon, Burma. Blayne's activities mirror the life of Barry Broman who spent time in Asia as an AP photographer, later as a Marine, and then with the CIA. Interview date Friday, 20 Feb 2026. Interviewer and Host AFIO President Emeritus James Hughes.

Send us Fan MailWhat does a real McKinsey interviewer-led case actually look like?In this episode, you'll step into a live McKinsey-style case interview focused on a luxury hotel expansion in Dubai targeting high-net-worth “whale” customers.Led by former McKinsey consultant Aditya Ghosh, this walkthrough breaks down how top candidates approach interviewer-led cases – from asking the right clarifying questions to structuring, solving exhibits, and communicating under pressure.You'll also see live feedback throughout the case, so you can understand not just what to do, but how interviewers evaluate your performance in real time.Work with Aditya:Join the Black Belt case prep program for personalized coaching with Aditya and a prep strategy tailored to your goals and timelineConnect with Aditya on LinkedInResources:Create a free account to access Case Interview Foundations – a crash course introduction to case interviewsWatch more McKinsey, BCG, and Bain case interview demos on YouTubeFree Consulting Prep Just Got a Whole Lot BetterCreate a free MC account for access to step-by-step learning pathways, a brand new case prep course, and more. Download the app to prep anywhere ( MBB Undergrad Timelines Are This MonthApplication deadlines are the earliest we've ever seen; join Black Belt for an accelerated, MBB-led prep programConnect With Management ConsultedCreate a free MC account or download the MC app (Apple, Android) to start your prep todaySchedule a free 15min consultation with the MC TeamWatch the video version of the podcast on YouTubeFollow us on LinkedIn, Instagram, and TikTokJoin an upcoming live event – case interviews demos, expert panels, and more

Mary Conquest, the famous host of the podcast, Safety Labs, has interviewed over a hundred people (including myself). I thought it would be a wonderful opportunity to engage with her and find out what she has learned through this journey. In this podcast, Mary reflects on her interviewing skills and what it makes to conduct good interviews. I' very fortunate to be interviewing the interviewer in this podcast and if you listen until the end, you will also learn that she is a wonderful human being at heart. Thank you Mary, it's nice to meet a fellow anthropologist. 

Bag om Københavnerhistorikerne er et supplement til Bag om København, og i denne udgave kan du møde historiker og museumsinspektør Jakob Ingemann Parby, der har arbejdet med mange forskellige sider af Københavns lange historie: Fra migrationen til byen gennem tiden til byens lyd. Hans seneste bog hedder 'Lyden af hovedstaden - støj, nerver og naboer i 1800-tallet' og den handler blandt andet om, hvordan opfattelsen af byens lyd har ændret sig og hvordan københavnerne længe har forsøgt at lære hinanden at være mere stille. Du kan høre om fransktalende papegøjer, om gadehandlere og omnibushorn – og hvordan lyden af piskesmæld kunne ødelægge al lyst til livet. Bag om Københavnerhistorikerne er et møde med de mennesker, der skriver om eller i København. Fælles for dem er, at de er historiefortællere: Det er dem, der undersøger og skaber de fortællinger om København, som vi bruger til at blive klogere på byen og dens lange og mangesidede historie. Interviewer og tilrettelægger: Mai-Britt Tollund. Klippet sammen af: Mai-Britt Tollund og Berit Freyheit Se litteraturliste og tilhørende artikel her   Facebook: Bag om Københavns podcast + nyhedsbrev Musikbidder er hentet fra FMA/Public Domain: Clouds by HoliznaCC0 & Narcissus smells like headache by Monplaisir Musikbidder er hentet fra FMA/Public Domain: Aaron Dunn - Minuet - Notebook for Anna Magdalena by Bach & Narcissus smells like headache by Monplaisir

In this week's Interview Classic podcasts, we jump back to ten years ago this week (3-10-2016) when PWTorch editor Wade Keller welcomes Brian Fritz, who interviewed Vince McMahon this week at the press conference announcing WrestleMania was coming back to Orlando, Fla. next week. He talks about his history in wrestling reporting, his approach to interviewing Vince McMahon, in person impressions of Vince at age 70, Roman Reigns's push, the video game/pro wrestling connection, and speculation on the WM33 line-up and where various returning injured names might land, who among the new crop could be featured, and what's likely for John Cena, Undertaker, and Roman Reigns. A mix of questions via email and phone call were included.Then, in a bonus segment from the previous day, PWTorch columnist Pat McNeill welcomed former WCW star Disco Inferno back to the Livecast for a full-length interview discussing the latest pro wrestling happenings, his philosophy on what's wrong with today's wrestlers, working with upcoming stars, and more topics with live calls and emails.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wade-keller-pro-wrestling-podcast--3076978/support.

Learn how leaders can improve listening skills, gather better intelligence, and communicate more effectively in high impact conversations.In this episode, Michael Reddington explores a surprising challenge many leaders face. The more successful, experienced, and knowledgeable we become, the harder it can be to truly listen.Senior leaders and technical experts often feel pressure to solve problems quickly. That pressure can push us into validation mode instead of learning mode. Instead of listening for new information, we start listening for the first opportunity to prove we are right, defend our ideas, or move the conversation forward faster.Michael explains why our brains are naturally wired to seek comfort and confirmation, and how that tendency can prevent us from gathering valuable intelligence during important conversations.You will learn practical techniques to improve your listening immediately, including how to elevate your outcomes, reduce internal distractions, relinquish control of conversations, and create space for others to share meaningful information. Michael also explains why excuses can actually reveal important truths and how leaders can use patience and curiosity to uncover the real issues behind problems.These strategies help leaders gather better intelligence, strengthen relationships, and improve decision making in high impact conversations.Chapters00:00 Why successful leaders often struggle to listen 01:35 How expertise and experience create communication barriers 03:32 The real reasons we listen in conversations 05:38 Why the human brain is not wired for great listening 07:05 Elevating outcomes and expectations to improve listening 10:23 Why the person with the information controls the conversation 12:02 Staying in a learning mindset and allowing yourself to be surprised 13:30 Limiting internal monologue to capture the full message 16:00 Recognizing emotional triggers and regaining focus 18:09 Why time pressure is the enemy of empathy 20:04 Leading to your expertise instead of leading with it 22:19 Why patience is one of the most valuable listening skills 23:35 Why excuses can reveal valuable truths in conversations 27:45 Key takeaways for leaders looking to improve their listeningResourcesThe Disciplined Listening Method by Michael ReddingtonConnect with Michael Reddingtonhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelreddington/SponsorsInQuasive:http://www.inquasive.com/Humintell: https://www.humintell.com/Enter code INQUASIVE25 for 25% off online training.International Association of Interviewers https://www.certifiedinterviewer.com/Podcast Production Serviceshttps://everyword.media

My guest today is David Sutcliffe, a somatic psychotherapist and former actor who has stepped off the red carpets of Hollywood to venture into the deeper landscapes of the masculine soul.David is something of an enigma to me. He's a therapist who champions the necessity of men getting in touch with their feelings and expressing their rage and grief. Yet, he is also an ardent Trump supporter and has interviewed uber-masculine figures like Andrew Tate.In this conversation, we certainly don't align on everything, but we remain willing to lean in and see what the friction reveals.It's worth saying: this conversation was recorded in September 2025, before the wake of the Epstein files released December 2025. This would have come up in our conversation if we had recorded this afterwards.A little more about David. For years, he was an archetypal “cute guy” or “bad boyfriend” on television - but behind the scenes he eventually found himself on his own road of ashes - where the trappings of fame and success turned to dust, inviting him into a more rigorous descent.Together, we explore the cost of the “nice guy” mask and the disorientation of a fatherless upbringing. We speak of the “devouring mother,” the search for authentic masculine role models, and his own views on “masculine leadership” and traditional gender roles.And finally, David reminds us that maturity demands the courage to face or darkness, tame the flames of our inner dragon, and take up the seat of our own sovereignty.A brief aside: for men who wish to work with me, you're invited to my upcoming immersion & online cohorts:* Awakening the Wild Erotic, Vancouver Island (April 24-26)* The Deep Masculine, Online (next cohort begins May 3)As well, don't miss the inaugural Cascadia Men's Conference, happening just north of Vancouver Aug 6-9th, 2026.For those drawn to David's style and offerings, check out the links below:SHOW LINKS* David Sutcliffe School for Kings* David Sutcliffe on IG * Poem - How to Tame A DragonSHOW NOTESHere are the show note highlights with the updated timecode format, tightened for impact:* 03:55 — The Geographic and Spiritual Check-in: David shares his current life in Mexico and how his relationship with God has become the anchor point of his life and marriage.* 05:40 — The Interviewer's Tightrope: Reflecting on David's interviews with polarizing figures like Andrew Tate and the “art of the interview” when navigating high-defense mechanisms.* 07:18 — From the Red Carpet to the Road of Ashes: David recounts his twenty-year acting career and the mid-life collapse that led him to trade Hollywood fame for the rigors of somatic healing.* 09:51 — The Alchemy of the Mat: An exploration of Core Energetics and the necessity of physical expression—hitting, kicking, and shouting—to move repressed “sob and rage.”* 13:10 — The Missing Father and the Devouring Mother: Discussing the psychic consequences of an absent father and how the resulting “devouring mother” energy can lead men to self-abandonment.* 26:45 — The War of the Sexes: A look at the “bitterness and vitriol” in modern gender relations and the cultural propaganda of the “bumbling father” in media.* 28:26 — Feminism and the Manosphere: David offers his take on how radicalized social movements can lead to a reactive “manosphere” and the collective struggle to truly see one another.* 39:15 — The Politics of Polarity: David addresses his shift from Hollywood progressive to a supporter of traditional values and Donald Trump, framing it as a return to “reality.”* 53:12 — The Strongman Archetype: Exploring the qualities of figures like Trump and Tate, and why men are gravitating toward “strongmen” in a landscape of cultural chaos.* 1:11:15 — Taming the Inner Dragon: A concluding reminder that our inner shadows are not to be slain, but looked in the eye until they recognize their master. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit themythicmasculine.substack.com/subscribe

Most of us were never actually taught how to communicate with other adults.We were conditioned to talk as kids, then we grew up and started leading teams, negotiating agreements, parenting, coaching, and managing high-stakes conversations.In this solo episode, I'm introducing the Disciplined Listening Method and walking through what it is, why I created it, and how you can start applying it right away.This method is built from behavioral science, interview and interrogation research, and real-world business communication. But at its core, it is simple.Create the communication experience the other person needs.When you do that consistently, you reduce resistance. You build trust. You create commitment instead of compliance.In this episode, I break down what makes a conversation high impact and the seven core behaviors that help you prepare, engage, and follow up with discipline.If you lead people, influence decisions, negotiate agreements, or want stronger relationships at home and at work, this is the foundation.Chapters(00:00) - Why This Series Matters(03:45) - What Is the Disciplined Listening Method(07:50) - Defining High Impact Conversations(12:15) - The Psychology of Commitment(16:30) - Three Core Communication Guidelines(22:45) - The Seven Behaviors(27:35) - Building Trust EquityConnect with MichaelWebsite: https://michaelreddington.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelreddington/Grab the Book! The Disciplined Listening Method: How A Certified Forensic Interviewer Unlocks Hidden Value in Every ConversationSponsor Links:InQuasive: http://www.inquasive.com/Humintell: https://www.humintell.com/Enter Code INQUASIVE25 for 25% discount on your online training purchase.International Association of Interviewers: https://www.certifiedinterviewer.com/Podcast Production Services by https://everyword.media

For this episode, we are bringing on the Advocacy Center's very own Forensic Interviewers! Tune in to listen about their roles at the Advocacy Center and in the lives of survivors. ❤️..Access the episode transcript at the following link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gDIhqgrVtP7T-M4JJIP2Eo5XGlVOq6XuAdvocacy Center Crisis Hotline (254) 752-7233 or (888) 867-7233Follow us on Instagram at @ACCVC_Prevention or @AdvocacyWaco

Tom Hannifan is a sharp, energetic lead play-by-play voice for TNA Wrestling, known for blending big-fight storytelling with modern sports pacing. Formerly recognized by fans as Tom Phillips in WWE, Hannifan brings credibility, passion, and a deep love of the craft to every broadcast. In the newest "Casual Conversations with The Classic'' episode, the Wrestling Classic Justin catches up with broadcaster Tom Hannifan as they discuss TNA on AMC, the partnership with NXT, his broadcasting journey, influences, favourite match to call, the viral split leg backstage interviews and much more! Enjoy!Socials@emilyjayeproMy Official Website + Demo Reel - https://www.justindhillon.com Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/thewrestlingclassic/ TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@thewrestlingclassic X - https://x.com/twcworldwide Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/@TheWrestlingClassic/ Limited Edition TWC Tee https://headquartersclothing.com/products/headquarters-x-the-wrestling-classic-logo-tee?_pos=1&_psq=wrestlinhg&_ss=e&_v=1.0 WWE Shop Affiliate wwe-shop.sjv.io/RGRxQv 500 Level https://www.500level.com/ Join the Discord Community https://linktr.ee/thewrestlingclassic All Episodes are on "The Wrestling Classic" Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOQOYraeFlX-xd8f3adQtTw#TomHannifan #TNAWrestling #TNA #TomPhillips Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/twc-show--4417554/support.

Too many managers make the mistake of thinking they have to be a "tough" interviewer. They think that interviewing is adversarial. They think they need to apply pressure to see how candidates react. But in fact, positive interviewing is much more effective, both in terms of outcomes and in terms of offer acceptance rates.

Too many managers make the mistake of thinking they have to be a "tough" interviewer. They think that interviewing is adversarial. They think they need to apply pressure to see how candidates react. But in fact, positive interviewing is much more effective, both in terms of outcomes and in terms of offer acceptance rates.

Renue Healthcare https://Renue.Healthcare/ToddYour journey to a better life starts at Renue Healthcare. Visit https://Renue.Healthcare/Todd Bulwark Capital https://KnowYourRiskPodcast.comFind out how the future of AI could impact your retirement during Zach Abraham's free “New Year Reset” live webinar This Thursday January 29th 3:30pm Pacific. Register at KnowYourRiskPodcast.com.Alan's Soaps https://www.AlansArtisanSoaps.comUse coupon code TODD to save an additional 10% off the bundle price.Bonefrog https://BonefrogCoffee.com/ToddThe new GOLDEN AGE is here!  Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions.LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE at:The Todd Herman Show - Podcast - Apple PodcastsThe Todd Herman Show | Podcast on SpotifyWATCH and SUBSCRIBE at: Todd Herman - The Todd Herman Show - YouTubeThere's a lot more that needs to be done. Thank God we left the WHO, but they haven't left us, I'll explain...Episode links:I FULLY support the Trump Admin pulling out of the World Health Organization and was proud to see legislation I introduced five years ago during COVID come to fruition. The WHO covered up on behalf of the ChiComms and pushes a leftist globalist agenda. Defund Tyranny.WHO SAYS: “We never imposed lockdowns or vaccine passports.” ALSO WHO: “You must follow lockdowns and use vaccine passports.” The WHO pushed policies that controlled movement and daily life, then denied it. People are NOT buying it.Bruce Alyward, senior advisor to the Director General of the World Health Organisation, pretends to not hear the question when asked if WHO would reconsider Taiwan's membership. Interviewer asks again and he shuts down meeting."We cannot afford to trust the WHO anymore." - Dr. Wahome Ngare from Kenya exposes a World Health Organization sterilization effort disguised as a vaccination campaign.BREAKING: New Study Reveals WHY Regulators Missed the DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccinesl The answer was hiding in plain sight—and it explains everything.The CEO of Moderna says he is deeply disappointed that the company's vaccines for children are no longer being recommended. He openly confesses that the decline in demand has hurt the vaccine business. He says Moderna no longer expects to invest in new Phase 3 vaccine studies anytime soon because it no longer has access to the U.S. market.

FREE RESOURCES & TOOLS:Join my newsletter for weekly job search and career tips you won't find anywhere else: https://www.resumeassassin.com/newsletter/ (Get instant access to my free ATS-friendly resume template)Resume Assassin: www.resumeassassin.com - Professional resume writing services and career coaching to land your dream roleResume Sidekick: www.resumesidekick.io - AI-powered resume optimization tools that help you beat Applicant Tracking SystemsLand Your Dream Job Course: https://academy.resumeassassin.com - My complete step-by-step system including the 2-Hour Job Search method, resume templates, LinkedIn optimization, and interview strategiesCONNECT WITH ME: LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/mary-southern Instagram: @resumeassassin TikTok: @resume_assassin_maryEPISODE TEASER So you walked out of that interview feeling pretty good, right? You answered everything perfectly. You had great examples. You were polished. And then... nothing. Meanwhile, someone else just got the offer.What happened? Here's the thing: interviewers aren't hiring based on what you think they're hiring on. There's a whole psychological game happening that nobody talks about. And once you understand it? Everything changes. In this video, I'm pulling back the curtain on what's ACTUALLY getting people hired.TIMESTAMPS0:00 - Intro: What Interviewers Are Really Looking For1:30 - Principle #1: They're Hiring a Solution, Not a Resume5:00 - Principle #2: Kill Their Fear of Making a Bad Hire8:30 - Principle #3: Make Them Look Good12:00 - Principle #4: Chemistry Beats Credentials15:30 - Principle #5: Prove You Want THIS Job19:00 - Principle #6: Lead the Conversation (Without Them Noticing)22:30 - Recap & Next StepsSubscribe for weekly videos every Wednesday!#JobSearch #CareerAdvice #ResumeAssassin #JobSearchTips #LinkedInStrategy #CareerGrowth #Networking #JobHunting #2HourJobSearch #CareerDevelopment

If you're rehearsing your stories five minutes before an interview, you're cooked. I'm not saying that to be dramatic. I'm saying it because it's true. Right before an interview is not the time to cram, memorize examples, or mentally sprint through your résumé. This will just get you tense, not to mention self-focused (

Companies are starting to use AI to interview potential employees. Sound creepy? Well, a new study suggests it might not be all bad.. Today on the show, we look at why a job interview with AI might be preferable to one with a human. ? And Adrian gets grilled by an AI job recruiter named “Anna.” Related episodes: AI creates, transforms and destroys … jobs Fighting AI with AI For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter. Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy