Podcasts about palle

Palle Thordal er pensioneret provst fra Amager og en del af Bethlehemskirkens menighed.

Den røde linje på skærmen betyder at der er trykket på ‘optage-knappen', selvom det godt kunne symbolisere aktiemarkedet lige pt…. Vi lægger ud med et lytterspørgsmål fra August, der handler om told - og hvilken betydning Trumps toldkrig kan få for dansk/europæisk landbrug. I Europa er vi storeksportører af fødevarer, men det er ikke mange varer der sendes over Atlanten. Tvært imod kan det få en sideeffekt at andre markeder bliver ‘sultne' på europæiske varer, fordi det bliver for dyrt at importere fra USA (som er verdens største fødevareeksporterende land). På dén måde kan konsekvenserne blive både positive og negative for os i Europa. Palle holder som altid øje med renterne, for de rører på sig, når verden er under forandring. Lige nu er forbrugertilliden meget lav, så der investeres ikke mange penge i nyt tag og køkkener, men derimod køber vi fx flere luksusfødevarer som kød, smør og vin. Resten af pengene ryger i banken, hvilket kan få betydning for renten og inflationen på et senere tidspunkt. Vi kommer også omkring korn-, protein- og energimarkedet. Alt andet end det europæiske hvedemarked ser positivt ud. Podcastserien "Markedsupdaten" er for dig der arbejder med landbrugsproduktion til daglig. Uanset om du malker, kører på marken, er driftleder eller noget helt andet, så er råvarepriser og det globale marked et vigtigt emne. Palle Jakobsen er eksperten og Anders Lau er værten.

Troppe news, (quasi) nessuna di cui vale parlare e allora facciamo una puntata scordandoci di Nintendo, dazi e faccende complicate. Parliamo solo dei giochi a cui ci siamo dedicati in queste settimane.Novità, anniversari e demo tutto in circa 90 minuti!A cosa vi state dedicando? Ditecelo con un commento!PAROLA DI BAFFOBaldur's Gate 3 [Steam] - https://tinyurl.com/3jhcx7r3Cocoon [Steam] - https://tinyurl.com/39tb6zx9Metro 2033 Redux [Steam] - https://tinyurl.com/2xfrmc9nLINK

Palle er vendt tilbage til studiet i denne uge - og det har vi glædet os til! Han har haft travlt den sidste måned, hvor han både har været rundt i Danmark og en tur i Polen. Vi starter månedens update med at tale kort om de animalske produkter, hvor priserne på både mælk og kød stiger. Ved mælken er det iøjenfaldende, at produktionen ikke er stigende endnu, som vi ellers plejer at opleve, når priserne er gode. Konklusionen må være, at mælkeproducenterne ikke synes, at prisen er høj nok til at de vil investere i yderligere produktion. Vi har historisk lave lagre med byg, hvede og majs i det meste af verden - men på grund af den globale situation sælger spekulanterne ud af varerne lige nu, hvilket skaber den effekt, at prisen er lav på trods af at lagrerne tømmes. På energimarkedet har de fleste rettet øjnene på Saudi Arabien, hvor der forhandles mellem Ukraine og Rusland. En fredsaftale kan nemlig få stor betydning, da sanktionerne mod Russisk energi kan blive ophævet og der vil komme til at blive et stort udbud. På proteinområdet er der mange varer på hylderne lige nu, men vejret i Sydamerika kan komme til at drille os.. Podcastserien "Markedsupdaten" er for dig der arbejder med landbrugsproduktion til daglig. Uanset om du malker, kører på marken, er driftleder eller noget helt andet, så er råvarepriser og det globale marked et vigtigt emne. Palle Jakobsen er eksperten og Anders Lau er værten.

Maracanà con Marco Piccari e Stefano Impallomeni. Ospiti: Orlando:" Il Napoli a Venezia nonostante ha costruito palle gol." Fedele" Il Napoli dopo 60' crolla fisicamente. Motta è un tirocinante." Impallomeni:"Il Napoli nelle ultime 7 partite 8 punti ma l'Inter e solo a +3."

Maracanà con Marco Piccari e Stefano Impallomeni. Ospiti: Orlando:" Il Napoli a Venezia nonostante ha costruito palle gol." Fedele" Il Napoli dopo 60' crolla fisicamente. Motta è un tirocinante." Impallomeni:"Il Napoli nelle ultime 7 partite 8 punti ma l'Inter e solo a +3."

Having a wonderful conversation with Palle and his work in the Middle East

Der Kampf um die Champions League an Spieltach 26! Nein, wir reden nicht über Leipzig und Dortmund, sondern über Mainz und Freiburg. Atobulus Serie reißt, Dahmens weiße Weste hält dagegen. Um Torhüter geht's auch mit dem Blick nach Bremen. Marcel berichtet vom Besuch an der Weser und feiert den Wiederholungs-Dreierpacker Plea. Und was macht eigentlich der Effzeh? Yannik zwischen Hoffnung und Skepsis und der Frage: Klappt es mit dem Aufstieg? TIMESTAMPS:(00:00) Bremen - Gladbach(18:38) Mainz - Freiburg(33:18) Augsburgs Serie(43:18) Was geht beim Effzeh: Ist der Aufstieg in Gefahr?(58:18) QuizJETZT PATRON WERDEN:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://patreon.com/derspieltach⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠WERDE TEIL DER COMMUNITY:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://discord.gg/bmsxDkwcqT⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠JETZT BEI KICKTIPP TEILNEHMEN:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Kicktipp.derSpieltach.de

Palle er hjemme i Danmark igen, men kun for en stund, for han er allerede på vej til udlandet igen. Der er også en ny vært i stolen, og han har glædet sig meget! Vi kommer nemlig til at være flere værter i Markedsupdaten fremover! Vi starter månedens opdatering med at se samlet på den animalske produktion. Mælkepriserne ser ud til at stige yderligere, også herhjemme, men der er andre dele af den animalske produktion, hvor vi halter bagefter resten af verden. Købekraften hos forbrugerne er efterhånden genoprettet, men produktionen er ikke fulgt med, så der er mulighed for at vi kommer til at se stigende priser - i hvertfald indtil produktionen kan følge med efterspørgslen. Både på korn og protein ser vi ind i et volatilt marked, hvor tingene hurtigt kan ændre sig - men vi ser generelt en større efterspørgsel, så Palles citat “Så, baby så”, som blev nævnt for en måned siden, lyder mere og mere fornuftigt. Energimarkedet er i frit fald lige nu og det gælder både gas, råolie og kul. Podcastserien "Markedsupdaten" er for dig der arbejder med landbrugsproduktion til daglig. Uanset om du malker, kører på marken, er driftleder eller noget helt andet, så er råvarepriser og det globale marked et vigtigt emne. Palle Jakobsen er eksperten og Anders Lau er værten.

Un editoriale nel periodo Sanremese è doveroso. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Så er det endelig tid til en update, og denne gang har Anders fanget Palle på telefonen. Palle er nemlig på studietur i Australien. Kornmarkedet er et ‘typisk vintermarked' - der sker ikke så meget. Der tegner sig et billedet af at vi ser ind i stigende efterspørgsel bl.a. fordi prisen er god i øjeblikket, og det får den betydning, at prisen kommer til at stige om 6-12 måneder, når de store kornlagre tømmes. Derfor er det nu, du skal dække dig af på korn. På energimarkedet kan de fleste nok høre et “DRILL BABY, DRILL” i det fjerne. Amerikanerne ønsker at lægge pres på renterne, og dermed inflationen, ved at skrue op for produktionen af ‘sort energi'. Spørgsmålet er om de store olie- og kulproducerende virksomheder kan se en økonomisk gevinst ved at skrue produktionen op. Det må vi afvente.. Vi slutter månedens episode af med at tale om det europæiske marked for grisekød. Det er gået rigtig godt på det europæiske marked i den seneste tid, imens det danske marked har haltet lidt bagefter, hvilket skaber en stor eksport. Podcastserien "Markedsupdaten" er for dig der arbejder med landbrugsproduktion til daglig. Uanset om du malker, kører på marken, er driftleder eller noget helt andet, så er råvarepriser og det globale marked et vigtigt emne. Palle Jakobsen er eksperten og Anders Lau er værten.

Penna e Calami di Luca Calami:" Conte ha due palle gigantesche. Palladino voto 4 ha sbagliato tutto. La Lazio si è ritrovata. Delusione Conceicao la fame la deve far venire lui."

Vi skal have sluttet året af, og vi skal i den forbindelse have evalueret nogle af de forudsigelser, som Palle har bragt på bordet i år. De fleste forudsigelser har siddet lige i kassen, men der er selvfølgelig også nogle ting, som er blevet justeret undervejs. Vi kigger også ind i det aktuelle marked, hvor det er iøjenfaldende at renteforskellen mellem USA og EU stiger. Det seneste rentefald i USA styrker dollarkursen, og det sker fordi der er store forventninger til den nyvalgte præsident og fordi de store økonomier i EU skranter. I Danmark går det egentlig godt med økonomien, både fordi fedmemedicin går som varmt brød og fordi vi har gennemført store reformer på bl.a. pensionsområdet under Corydon. Podcastserien "Markedsupdaten" er for dig der arbejder med landbrugsproduktion til daglig. Uanset om du malker, kører på marken, er driftleder eller noget helt andet, så er råvarepriser og det globale marked et vigtigt emne. Palle Jakobsen er eksperten og Anders Lau er værten.

Lundi 18 novembre, la société exploitant le tunnel sous la Manche prolongeait ses travaux suite à la rupture d'un de ses plus importants câbles électriques. En Ukraine, les drones russes lancés lundi 18 novembre visaient essentiellement des installations électriques. Comment et pourquoi le transport de l'électricité est-il stratégique ? Angélique Palle, experte internationale à l'Institut de recherche stratégique de l'École militaire (Irsem) à Paris, décrypte les enjeux du transport de l'électricité. Une rediffusion du 23 novembre 2024. RFI : Commençons avec une question de novice : par quel moyen transporte-t-on l'électricité (terre, mer, rail…) ? Angélique Palle : Principalement par des câbles terrestres, ce que l'on appelle les lignes électriques. Il y en a de plusieurs dimensions avec des puissances différentes selon les zones traversées. Ces lignes à haute ou moyenne tension, que l'on peut voir dans le paysage européen, existent-elles partout dans le monde ?   Oui. Seulement, ces lignes ne sont pas installées de la même façon. Il y a des différences majeures entre, par exemple, l'Union européenne, le continent africain ou encore le réseau des États-Unis ou de la Russie.  Quelles sont ces différences ? En Europe, le réseau est un réseau intégré. Il s'étend sur l'ensemble du continent. Il dépasse même les frontières de l'Union européenne puisqu'il englobe aussi bien les lignes de la France, de la Grèce, mais aussi de l'Ukraine. En Afrique ou aux USA, par exemple, chaque État ou région ou pays décide du calibre, du nombre et des lieux de ses lignes.  Ce choix de réseau intégré a été fait pour des raisons économiques, c'est moins cher de faire groupé ?  C'est surtout un choix stratégique et sécuritaire. Le marché européen étant unique, il était plus facile d'harmoniser la localisation, le transport et l'acheminement jusqu'au consommateur de l'électricité. Mais c'est vrai que la construction des lignes à haute tension coûte extrêmement cher. Dans les années 1990, l'Union européenne a appliqué son choix aux pays baltes par exemple, non sans difficultés ! Pour quelles raisons ? Parce qu'il a fallu les décrocher du réseau russe. La plaque russe est différente de la plaque européenne. C'est un peu technique, mais les ingénieurs ont dû travailler de longs mois afin de changer les calibres et les installations.Lors des attaques de drones russes en Ukraine, on constate qu'ils visent les installations électriques, ces lignes de transport en font partie ? Évidemment ! Le but de la Russie est de toucher le cœur de l'économie et de la population ukrainienne. Or, avec l'hiver surtout, les gens sans électricité ne peuvent pas vivre. Il n'y aurait pas de chauffage, pas d'énergie pour les communications. Et puis n'oublions pas les usines d'armement qui sont des usines consommatrices de grandes quantités d'électricité.  Vous évoquez l'importance stratégique de ces lignes à haute tension. Cette année, vous avez rédigé pour les armées, le ministère français de la Défense, un rapport sur les enjeux de l'avenir du transport de l'électricité. Quels sont ces enjeux ?  Nous avons exposé les faiblesses de ce type de transport à l'aune du siècle à venir. L'une des vulnérabilités va concerner les catastrophes naturelles. C'est l'une des failles les plus importantes.Les tremblements de terre ?  Plutôt les tornades, les tempêtes, les coulées de boue, avec les effondrements de terrain. La seconde vulnérabilité est du côté du choix énergétique de l'Europe, à savoir les énergies renouvelables (éolien, hydraulique, solaire…)  En quoi représentent-elles des faiblesses ? Là encore, c'est assez technique. Mais ce type d'électricité est une énergie qui ne se transporte pas ni ne se stocke de la même façon. Ce sont des énergies plus instables, elles se produisent par périodicité et non pas en continu. Il faut donc piloter et veiller à adapter ces instabilités au transport sur l'ensemble du réseau.  À lire aussiLa France s'apprête à battre des records d'exportation d'électricité en 2024

ADELANTEEE Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

En dreng vokser op i en rig norsk familie i 1920'ernes Egypten. Siden rejser han til Schweiz for at gå på kostskole - og i 1940'erne engagerer han sig i modstandskampen i Skandinavien. Det lyder som et liv fuldt af eventyr og spænding - men sådan er virkeligheden ikke! Drengen er nemlig det ensomste menneske i verden, og det er netop denne dreng, der siden bliver far til fortælleren i romanen, 'Fars ryg'. Norske, Niels Fredrik Dahl løb med Nordisk Råds Litteraturpris 2024 for sin bog om arv, ensomhed og fædre - og du kan møde ham i dagens program. Oversætter, redaktør og kender af nordisk litteratur, Anita Frank Goth er gæst i studiet. Vært: Nanna Mogensen.

Palle sidder i bilen på vej til Agromek, så vi har fanget ham på telefonen. Vi skal først høre, hvordan de første par dage på messen har været. Vi starter månedens update ud med at tale om kornmarkedet, som står i en mærkelig situation. Vi slutter nemlig høståret med de kornlaveste lagre i over 20 år, og det får formegentlig priserne til at stige. Amerikanerne tror på en god proteinhøst, og vejrforholdene ser gode ud til høsten i både Nord- og Sydamerika. Derfor ser det ud til at priserne vil forblive lave, muligvis med en lille stigning indtil den Sydamerikanske høst er i hus. På energimarkedet skuer vi igen til USA, hvor forventningerne til den kommende præsidentperiode er, at der skal pumpes store mængder olie - derimod bliver der nok skruet ned for investeringerne i grøn energiproduktion. Vi forventer at prisen på olie skal falde indenfor et års tid. Vi afslutter programmet med at diskutere renterne, som Palle er ganske sikker på vil falde yderligere. Podcastserien "Markedsupdaten" er for dig der arbejder med landbrugsproduktion til daglig. Uanset om du malker, kører på marken, er driftleder eller noget helt andet, så er råvarepriser og det globale marked et vigtigt emne. Palle Jakobsen er eksperten og Anders Lau er værten.

Lundi 18 novembre, la société exploitant le tunnel sous la Manche prolongeait ses travaux suite à la rupture d'un de ses plus importants câbles électriques. En Ukraine, les drones russes lancés lundi 18 novembre visaient essentiellement des installations électriques. Comment et pourquoi le transport de l'électricité est-il stratégique ? Angélique Palle, experte internationale à l'Institut de recherche stratégique de l'École militaire (IRSEM) à Paris, décrypte les enjeux du transport de l'électricité.     RFI : Commençons avec une question de novice : par quel moyen transporte-t-on l'électricité (terre, mer, rail…) ? Angélique Palle : Principalement par des câbles terrestres, ce que l'on appelle les lignes électriques. Il y en a de plusieurs dimensions avec des puissances différentes selon les zones traversées. Ces lignes à haute ou moyenne tension, que l'on peut voir dans le paysage européen, existent-elles partout dans le monde ?   Oui. Seulement, ces lignes ne sont pas installées de la même façon. Il y a des différences majeures entre, par exemple, l'Union européenne, le continent africain ou encore le réseau des États-Unis ou de la Russie.  Quelles sont ces différences ? En Europe, le réseau est un réseau intégré. Il s'étend sur l'ensemble du continent. Il dépasse même les frontières de l'Union européenne puisqu'il englobe aussi bien les lignes de la France, de la Grèce, mais aussi de l'Ukraine. En Afrique ou aux USA, par exemple, chaque État ou région ou pays décide du calibre, du nombre et des lieux de ses lignes.  Ce choix de réseau intégré a été fait pour des raisons économiques, c'est moins cher de faire groupé ?  C'est surtout un choix stratégique et sécuritaire. Le marché européen étant unique, il était plus facile d'harmoniser la localisation, le transport et l'acheminement jusqu'au consommateur de l'électricité. Mais c'est vrai que la construction des lignes à haute tension coûte extrêmement cher. Dans les années 1990, l'Union européenne a appliqué son choix aux pays baltes par exemple, non sans difficultés ! Pour quelles raisons ? Parce qu'il a fallu les décrocher du réseau russe. La plaque russe est différente de la plaque européenne. C'est un peu technique, mais les ingénieurs ont dû travailler de longs mois afin de changer les calibres et les installations.Lors des attaques de drones russes en Ukraine, on constate qu'ils visent les installations électriques, ces lignes de transport en font partie ? Évidemment ! Le but de la Russie est de toucher le cœur de l'économie et de la population ukrainienne. Or, avec l'hiver surtout, les gens sans électricité ne peuvent pas vivre. Il n'y aurait pas de chauffage, pas d'énergie pour les communications. Et puis n'oublions pas les usines d'armement qui sont des usines consommatrices de grandes quantités d'électricité.  Vous évoquez l'importance stratégique de ces lignes à haute tension. Cette année, vous avez rédigé pour les armées, le ministère français de la Défense, un rapport sur les enjeux de l'avenir du transport de l'électricité. Quels sont ces enjeux ?  Nous avons exposé les faiblesses de ce type de transport à l'aune du siècle à venir. L'une des vulnérabilités va concerner les catastrophes naturelles. C'est l'une des failles les plus importantes.Les tremblements de terre ?  Plutôt les tornades, les tempêtes, les coulées de boue, avec les effondrements de terrain. La seconde vulnérabilité est du côté du choix énergétique de l'Europe, à savoir les énergies renouvelables (éolien, hydraulique, solaire…)  En quoi représentent-elles des faiblesses ? Là encore, c'est assez technique. Mais ce type d'électricité est une énergie qui ne se transporte pas ni ne se stocke de la même façon. Ce sont des énergies plus instables, elles se produisent par périodicité et non pas en continu. Il faut donc piloter et veiller à adapter ces instabilités au transport sur l'ensemble du réseau.  À lire aussiLa France s'apprête à battre des records d'exportation d'électricité en 2024

M

Cosa divide gli uomini dai ragazzi                            In sottofondo, la finale di Wimbledon 1980 tra Borg e McEnroe (dal canale YouTube di Wimbledon all rights reserved)

Una finestra sui fatti del giorno per andare oltre le notizie. Il direttore Daniele Capezzone dà voce ai contenuti editoriali di Libero con un extra-editoriale in formato podcast.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/libero-in-tre-minuti--5680426/support.

In dieser Episode sprechen wir mit Journalist und Aktivist Palle Petersen, der als Redakteur beim Schweizer Architekturmedium Hochparterre über Architektur und Nachhaltigkeit schreibt. Wir fragen ihn u.a.: Wie treibt man die Bauwende in der Architekturbranche voran? Wie vereinbarst du Journalismus und Aktivismus? Außerdem blicken wir zurück auf seine wichtigen Recherchen zu MeToo in Architecture und Professor X.

Berlingskes Web-TV er det originale flow, en status før "Valg Amok 2024", vi er tilbage på Jyllands-Posten med abonnement, Palle giver lige akkurat to hjerter, ring nu bare til Kaas, Inderne går lidt under radaren, et godt årsværk er et jævnt godt mord, kommunal energi i Canada, pakker i brand med Rusland bagved, 'Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz', shit-vicepræsident, Trump har stadig samme opbakning, 'Podcasternes Podcaster', Falkejagt med Robert som gevinst, Spurgt! - Bertel Haarder, øksemanden fra Svebølle, pandemien i Rusland, som ingen taler om, er fald fra lejligheder, ugens film er koreansk, og næsetyven er her.Vil du høre hele episoden?Få 30 dages gratis prøveperiode (kan kun benyttes af nye Podimo-abonnenter): https://go.podimo.com/dk/hgdg(79 kroner herefter)Eller få 3 mdr. med 50% rabat (kan bruges af tidligere Podimo-abonnenter): https://go.podimo.com/dk/hgdgtilbud(79 kroner herefter)Værter: Esben Bjerre & Peter Falktoft Redigering: PodAmokKlip: PodAmokMusik: Her Går Det GodtInstagram: @hergaardetgodt @Peterfalktoft @Esbenbjerre

In episode 212 of our SAP on Azure video podcast we talk about Copilot for Finance. We have talked a lot in the past about Power Platform, Copilot Studio and integrating all of this with SAP. Especially with Copilot Studio it is quite amazing what customers and partners can do to build Copilots connecting to SAP. But a lot of customers have similar requirements. A lot of customers -- like also Microsoft -- are using SAP for Finance. So why not have a Copilot dedicatd for Finance? Well, luckily we have Copilot for Finance and both Russel Hercules and Sandhya Palle are here to tell us more about it. Find all the links mentioned here: https://www.saponazurepodcast.de/episode212Reach out to us for any feedback / questions:* Robert Boban: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rboban/* Goran Condric: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gorancondric/* Holger Bruchelt: https://www.linkedin.com/in/holger-bruchelt/ #Microsoft #SAP #Azure #SAPonAzure #Copilot

I denne uge har vi ekstra snolder til jer lyttere i form af dette bonusafsnit af 'Det Ovale Kontor'. I selskab med Palle Navntoft Christensen, der er general manager og medstifter af det nye dansk-svenske ELF-hold Nordic Storm, bliver programmets vært, Alexander Wøhlk, og jer lyttere gjort klogere på, hvordan det er at starte et football-franchise fra bunden af med rødder i dansk- og svensk football. Tak til vores partner Cashpoint sportsspil. Tak til alle jer 10er støttere, der lytter og støtter Det Ovale Kontor med en kærkommen skilling på 10er.com/detovalekontor. Link til Gamepass: gulklud.dk/nfl/vaersgo-nfl-gam…g-dobbelt-saa-fedt/ Link til Picks-liga: picks.dk/seasons/nfl-picks-20…le-kontor-1725360799 Vært er: Alexander Wøhlk Gæst er: Palle Navntoft Christensen

Palle Bo is from Denmark, which controls Greenland. He's been to Greenland twice, and I was blessed to visit it in 2024. We share our thoughts. Palle hosts the Radio Vagabond podcast! Subscribe to it! Enjoy other Palle Bo episodes!  Feedback Leave an anonymous voicemail on SpeakPipe.com/FTapon Or go to Wanderlearn.com, click on this episode, and write a comment. More info You can post comments, ask questions, and sign up for my newsletter at http://wanderlearn.com. If you like this podcast, subscribe and share!  On social media, my username is always FTapon. Connect with me on: Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram TikTok LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr My Patrons sponsored this show! Claim your monthly reward by becoming a patron at http://Patreon.com/FTapon Rewards start at just $2/month! Affiliate links Start your podcast with my company, Podbean, and get one month free! In the USA, I recommend trading crypto with Kraken.  Outside the USA, trade crypto with Binance and get 5% off your trading fees! For backpacking gear, buy from Gossamer Gear.

What kind of traveler are you? Palle Bo and I discuss the variety of travel styles and the myth of how people who have been to many countries travel. Palle hosts the Radio Vagabond podcast! Subscribe to it! Enjoy our other episodes together! Feedback Leave an anonymous voicemail on SpeakPipe.com/FTapon Or go to Wanderlearn.com, click on this episode, and write a comment. More info You can post comments, ask questions, and sign up for my newsletter at http://wanderlearn.com. If you like this podcast, subscribe and share!  On social media, my username is always FTapon. Connect with me on: Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram TikTok LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr My Patrons sponsored this show! Claim your monthly reward by becoming a patron at http://Patreon.com/FTapon Rewards start at just $2/month! Affiliate links Start your podcast with my company, Podbean, and get one month free! In the USA, I recommend trading crypto with Kraken.  Outside the USA, trade crypto with Binance and get 5% off your trading fees! For backpacking gear, buy from Gossamer Gear.

Radio Vagabond Host Palle Bo shares the meaning of his name in various languages.  We share what we've been doing since we last met in Thailand. Lastly, Palle shares why it's worth revisiting countries that gave you a negative impression the first time. Palle hosts the Radio Vagabond podcast! Subscribe to it! Enjoy other Palle Bo episodes!  Feedback Leave an anonymous voicemail on SpeakPipe.com/FTapon Or go to Wanderlearn.com, click on this episode, and write a comment. More info You can post comments, ask questions, and sign up for my newsletter at http://wanderlearn.com. If you like this podcast, subscribe and share!  On social media, my username is always FTapon. Connect with me on: Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram TikTok LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr My Patrons sponsored this show! Claim your monthly reward by becoming a patron at http://Patreon.com/FTapon Rewards start at just $2/month! Affiliate links Start your podcast with my company, Podbean, and get one month free! In the USA, I recommend trading crypto with Kraken.  Outside the USA, trade crypto with Binance and get 5% off your trading fees! For backpacking gear, buy from Gossamer Gear.

Palle Bo and I met in Toronto this week to discuss the global hot spots and the US election. We chat about Harris vs. Trump, Ukraine, Taiwan, and Gaza. Palle has been to Taiwan and recently went to Ukraine, near the front lines. As an outsider, he's bewildered by the US election. We recorded this a day before Harris picked her VP, Walz. Please subscribe to Palle's Radio Vagabond podcast! Enjoy other Palle Bo episodes!  More info You can post comments, ask questions, and sign up for my newsletter at http://wanderlearn.com. If you like this podcast, subscribe and share!  On social media, my username is always FTapon. Connect with me on: Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram TikTok LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr My Patrons sponsored this show! Claim your monthly reward by becoming a patron at http://Patreon.com/FTapon Rewards start at just $2/month! Affiliate links Start your podcast with my company, Podbean, and get one month free! In the USA, I recommend trading crypto with Kraken.  Outside the USA, trade crypto with Binance and get 5% off your trading fees! For backpacking gear, buy from Gossamer Gear.  

To bankansatte bliver skudt og dræbt under et bankrøveri. Gerningsmanden, Palle, flygter bagefter på cykel, men politiet finder ham umiddelbart efter. Hvad politiet ikke ved på det her tidspunkt er, at sagen i årene efter bliver en af de mest spektakulære i Danmarkshistorien, fordi Palle var udsat for hypnose inden drabene. Hør hele afsnittet i DR Lyd.

Politimorderen Palle Sørensen sidder fængslet 32 år, 7 måneder og 15 dage - selvom en livstidsstraf i Danmark typisk er overstået i løbet af 12-13 år.  Myndighederne kalder ham Danmarks farligste mand og netop farlighedskriteriet gør at han sidder så længe - heraf 10 år i isolation. Palle appellerer flere gange for, at han skal løslades. Retslægerådet konkluderer hver gang at han ikke er sindssyg, men lider af dyssocial personlighedsforstyrrelse. Først i 1997 "foreligger der ikke længere vægtige lægelige grunde til at fraråde benådning. 14 måneder senere løslades han - 70 år gammel   Skrevet og fortalt af Berit Freyheit Her finder du en kildeliste. Københavns Biblioteker - LYD på Facebook. 104

In this episode of The Radio Vagabond, join host Palle Bo as he takes you on a whirlwind tour through the iconic attractions of Barcelona, Spain. From the historic Montjuïc to the vibrant La Rambla, and from the football frenzy of Camp Nou to the artistic wonders of the Picasso Museum, Palle explores the rich tapestry of culture, history, and creativity that defines this beautiful city. Get ready to be inspired by the architectural marvels of Park Güell and the breath-taking Sagrada Família. Whether you're planning a trip or simply want to immerse yourself in the beauty of Barcelona, this episode is your ultimate guide. Listen now and start dreaming of your next adventure.     Podcast Episode Link: http://theradiovagabond.com/334-barcelona 

In this episode of The Radio Vagabond, join host Palle Bo as he takes you on a whirlwind tour through the iconic attractions of Barcelona, Spain. From the historic Montjuïc to the vibrant La Rambla, and from the football frenzy of Camp Nou to the artistic wonders of the Picasso Museum, Palle explores the rich tapestry of culture, history, and creativity that defines this beautiful city. Get ready to be inspired by the architectural marvels of Park Güell and the breath-taking Sagrada Família. Whether you're planning a trip or simply want to immerse yourself in the beauty of Barcelona, this episode is your ultimate guide. Listen now and start dreaming of your next adventure.     Podcast Episode Link: http://theradiovagabond.com/334-barcelona 

Palle Sørensen er en helt almindelige indbrudstyv - og dog. Den 18. september 1965 skyder og dræber han fire politibetjente på Amager.  Palle idømmes livsvarigt fængsel. Og politiet ændrer procedurer og begynder at bære våben. Skrevet og fortalt af Berit Freyheit Her finder du en kildeliste. Københavns Biblioteker - LYD på Facebook. 103

I 1980'erne blev 91 danske blødere smittet med hiv gennem blødermedicin der blev produceret på blodplasma fra bloddonorer. Kun 23 lever endnu. I den her fortælling kan du møde tre mennesker, hvis liv blev ændret i kølvandet på skandalen. Hovedpersonen er Per, som havde et ganske særligt og smittende mod på livet. Hans to gode venner, Palle og Gert, fortæller. Tilrettelæggelse: Katrine Hedegaard. Redaktør og producer: Torben Brandt. Kontakt: radiofortaellinger@dr.dk

Wir alle beherrschen unsere Gedanken und Handlungen - oder etwa nicht? Nach einem versuchten Bankraub in Kopenhagen wirkt die Sache für die Polizist:innen zunächst ganz klar: Sie haben den Täter. Der 29-jährige Palle war kurz nach seiner Tat im Treppenhaus eines Wohnhauses gestellt worden. Außerdem ist er geständig und bestätigt, bei seinem Überfall zwei Bankmitarbeiter erschossen zu haben. Doch das mutmaßliche Ende der Ermittlungen entpuppt sich als Trugschluss, als Palle eine weitere Person ins Spiel bringt. Eine Person, die ihm die Tat angeblich befohlen hat… In dieser Folge von “Mordlust - Verbrechen und ihre Hintergründe” betreten wir die geheimnisvolle Welt der Hypnose. Eine Methode, die mittlerweile umfangreich erforscht ist und längst nicht mehr als Hokuspokus abgestempelt werden kann. Doch während das Potenzial für medizinische und therapeutische Zwecke bereits unumstritten ist, herrscht in einer zentralen Sache nach wie vor Uneinigkeit: Reicht die Macht der Suggestionen tatsächlich so weit, um das Handeln einer Person zu kontrollieren? Und kann man unter Hypnose jemanden dazu bringen, ein Verbrechen zu begehen? Interviewpartner in dieser Folge: Mentalist Timon Krause **Credit** Produzentinnen/ Hosts: Paulina Krasa, Laura Wohlers Redaktion: Paulina Krasa, Laura Wohlers, Jennifer Fahrenholz Schnitt: Pauline Korb Rechtliche Abnahme: Abel und Kollegen **Shownotes** Mörderakte: “#625 Björn Nielsen & Palle Hardrup / Mystery detektiv”: https://t1p.de/rx32z Unmasking A Murderer: “Episode 2: Can you Hypnotize Someone to Commit Murder?”: https://t1p.de/fsscv Paul J. Reiter: “Antisocial Or Criminal Acts and Hypnosis: A Case Study” **Partner der Episode** Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte: https://linktr.ee/Mordlust

Puntata 515: Valeria ci parla dei casi di influenza aviaria H5N1 documentati di recente negli Stati Uniti  nelle mucche e negli umani. Nonostante le mucche non siano un ospite abituale dei virus influenzali, negli Stati Uniti si sono riportate infezioni da parte di questo virus in molti paesi diversi che tuttavia non interessano il tratto respiratorio ma le mammelle. Questo virus sembra essere in grado di essere trasmesso da mucca a mucca nonostante non siano ancora chiare le modalità. Sono anche stati registrati 3 casi umani di persone a diretto contatto con le mucche, che hanno mostrato come sintomo principale la congiuntivite. La situazione va monitorata in quanto dobbiamo prevenire un adattamento del virus all'uomo e il passaggio del virus da uomo a uomo. Tuttavia dobbiamo ricordare che, sulla carta, rispetto al covid siamo in una situazione migliore sotto diversi aspetti. In esterna, in differita dal Mantova Food&Science Festival, Simone intervista uno Stefano Bertacchi selvatico sulle TEA, le tecnologie di evoluzione assistita. Stefano è un biotecnologo, ricercatore e divulgatore scientifico. E' autore di 4 libri e colleziona pokemon.Dopo la barza Marco continua a parlare di palle di cose strane, in questo caso le gluebal, palle di gluoni, le controparti del fotone per la forza nucleare forte.Per approfondire:https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2405495https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2405371https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/avian-flu-summary.htmhttps://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Communicable-disease-threats-report-week-22-2024.pdfDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/scientificast--1762253/support.

Este número 22.2024 de La Montaña Rusa es un número Especial Monográfico dedicado a la figura y trayectoria del contrabajista Palle Danielsson que nos ha dejado recientemente. De la misma forma que comentamos en su momento, cuando nos despedimos del batería Jon Christensen, podemos decir lo mismo de Palle Danielsson. Y es que ambos, juntos o en diferentes proyectos, al lado de otros grandes músicos, dieron forma al llamado sonido ECM, el sello de Manfred Eincher, en los 70 y 80. Seguir leyendo La Montaña Rusa. Episodio 22.2024. Especial Monográfico Palle Danielsson. en La Montaña Rusa Radio Jazz.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Fredag! I dag blir det en jäddra fest. Bajs i fjällen, bajs i andra fjäll, bajs i träd, ja gud vet vad. Har du ett skvaller som fler borde få höra? Maila det till kafferepetpod@gmail.comMissa inte vår månatliga systerpodd Cigarrummet. Bli prenumerant på www.underproduktion.se/cigarrummet10:20 - Sören Syren18:04 - Alltför fri gång23:25 - Conny och lejonkungen27:37 - Jag tog honom i nöd och bajs 38:30 - Mellandagsmolnet44:04 - Skidsemester med extra allt55:09 - Torbjörn är otacksam1:07:29 - Palle börjar högstadiet1:12:06 - Ett arbetsmiljöproblem Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Fredag! Lite skratt, lite äckel, lite mittemellan. Och en riktig framgångssaga! Har du ett skvaller som fler borde få höra? Maila det till kafferepetpod@gmail.comMissa inte vår månatliga systerpodd Cigarrummet. Bli prenumerant på www.underproduktion.se/cigarrummet6:57 - Ett välkomnande med proffsig timing9:10 - Äpplejuice13:51 - Akten att gå ner på någon21:30 - Julias pappa, piraten 24:36 - Testa detta hemma30:52 - När jag var mördare… Tydligen. 34:48 - En nödvändig hämnd39:19 - Palle och glassfabriken43:00 - Arbetsrätt och kunskapsluckor Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This episode's guest comes to you from the other side of the globe. Originally from Dallas, singer/songwriter Vanessa Peters has released several highly acclaimed albums and has done some extensive touring stateside using what she calls, "accidental chutzpah" to book her own shows. Now she makes Italy her home. We talk about her new album, "Flying On Instruments", what the transition to overseas life was like for this ex-pat, and also how some things get lost in translation. Like when a confused Italian tour manager told Vanessa's guitar player to "tocco le palle". www.vanessapeters.com

Nella puntata 499, a un episodio dalla 500 (che però salteremo per fare uno specialone dopo), Valeria ci parla dell'aumento di casi di febbre Dengue in Brasile, con 400.000 casi registrati dall'inizio del 2024. La diffusione di questo patogeno si sta allargando ad aree precedentemente non fortemente colpite, ed è importante ricordarci che nell'estate 2023 anche in Francia e in Italia (82 casi) sono state registrate infezioni acquisite localmente. Nonostante non ci siano farmaci a disposizione Valeria ci parla di un antivirale attualmente in trial clinico che sembra essere promettente.Nella rubrica mensile Scientifibook, Giuliana e Andrea Vico ci consigliano libri bellissimi:- "Il male detto - Che cosa chiamiamo dolore" - di Roberta Fulci, Codice Edizioni- "Andrej Sacharov. L'uomo che non aveva paura" - di Ksenija Novochat'ko, illustrato da Evgenija Rojzman e Ol'ga Terechova, Caissa Italia- "D(i)ritto al cibo. Spreco, dintorni, contorni e... canzoni" - di Andrea Segrè, Scienza Express- "Il libro che ti aiuta a comunicare meravigliosamente con tutti gli umani" - di Françoize Boucher, Il Castoro- "Micro. Il mondo invisibile dentro di noi" - di Katie Brosnan, Il BarbagianniSegue una barza di Marco talmente brutta che Valeria non la capisce...Infine Marco ci parla delle fuzz-balls, una possibile soluzione al paradosso meccanica quantistica / relatività generale che si manifesta nei buchi neri. In questa ipotesi i buchi neri sono pieni di stringhe quantistiche e l'orizzonte degli eventi non è liscio ma ricoperto di microscopiche (alla scala di Planck!) stringhe che lo rendono "pelosetto".Per approfondire:Denguehttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05790-6https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03990-6Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/scientificast--1762253/support.

Pablos: People are pissed off about social media all the time. They think that Facebook is making people vote for the wrong person. It's still very difficult to find somebody who thinks they voted for the wrong person because of Facebook, but they think everyone else did. Never mind that, there's this kind of, uh, very popular sensibility, which is to blame Facebook for all the problems in the world. They're doing fake news, they're doing, disinformation they're doing , every possible thing that could be wrong. Everybody wants to blame Facebook for getting wrong or Twitter or, any of the other social platforms. So if you think about it, in one sense, , yeah, Facebook got everybody together. I'm just going to use them as the example, we can extrapolate. They got everybody together. They, ended up getting too much content. you and your friends are posting too much shit. Nobody has time to see all of it. So you need the magical algorithm, which you should do like triple air quotes every time I say algorithm. They're like, the algorithm is supposed to figure out, okay, of all the shit that's supposed to be showing up on your feed, what's the coolest, or what's the stuff that you're gonna like the most? That's the job of the algorithm. And of course, we all believe the algorithm is tainted. And so, it's not really trying to find the things I care about the most or like the most. It's just gonna find the things that piss me off the most so that I get my, outrage, dopamine hit and keep coming back. So, which may all be true. We don't know. But, the point is, there's a fundamental problem, which is you cannot see everything that gets posted from all the people you follow. So, there does have to be some ranking. And then the second, thing is that you want that ranking to be tuned for you. And I think the thing that people, are missing about this is that you've got to have, a situation where it is very personalized because, not everybody's the same. Even if you and I followed the same thousand people, it doesn't mean we have identical interests. There are other factors that need to play into determining like what I want to see and what you want to see. And then I think that there's a whole bunch of things that, are classified as societal evils, that Facebook has to decide are not okay for anybody to follow. So if you have posts about Hitler, nobody should get to see those. Even if you're a World War II historian, nope, you don't get to see it. So there's a kind of, problem here, which is that all of this flies in the face of actual diversity, actual multiculturalism, we have 190 countries in the world. We have a lot of different peoples, different cultures, you and I just had a huge conversation about, different cultures and how they drive, we don't agree about these things. We have different ideas in different places in the world, even whole societies have different ideas about what's okay, and what's not okay, and that is the definition of Culture that is the definition of multiculturalism is valuing that that exists and letting everybody have their own ideas And and make let these different people operate in the way that suits them And when you travel, you get beaten over the head with that because, I can appreciate that people drive like this in Bangkok. That's not how I want to do it , that's kind of the fundamental point here. So anyway, what I'm trying to get at is you cannot create one set of rules for the entire world. That is not okay. Ash: 100% Pablos: And so what Facebook has chosen to do is try to create one set of rules for the entire world, at least the two billion people that are on Facebook. Ash: But then you become the government of Facebook. Pablos: You become the government of Facebook. And it's and we're all pissed off because they keep choosing rules that some people don't like or whatever. And so I think this is untenable and I don't think there's a solution there. I think it is a fool's errand and what I believe is, has gone wrong is that Facebook made the wrong choice long ago and they chose to control the knobs and dials and now they're living with the flack that comes with, every choice they make about where to set those knobs and dials. And what they should have done is given the user the knobs and dials. They should let me have buried six pages deep in the settings, have control over. What do you want more of? What do you want less of? Ash: More or less rant. Pablos: Yeah, They try to placate you with the like button and unfollow and all that, but it's not really control. So, contrast that with, the other fork in history that we didn't take, go back to like 2006, in the years before Facebook, We had this beautiful moment on the internet, with RSS. So RSS, which stands for Really Simple Syndication, that hardly matters, RSS was an open standard that allowed any website to publish the content in the form of posts in a kind of machine readable way. And then you could have an RSS reader that could subscribe to any website. So we didn't have the walled garden of Facebook, but, you remember all this, of course, but I'm just trying to break it down here. What we had was, this kind of open standard. , anybody in the world could publish on RSS using their website, all the blog software did this out of the box. WordPress does it out of the box. In fact, most websites, would support RSS. And then you had a reader app, that could be any reader app. This is again, open standards so get any reader you want. And if you just subscribe to any website in the world, you are following them directly. When they publish a post, it show up in your feed. And when you followed too many people, you could start making filters. So I've been making filters. I still do RSS. So by the way, all this machinery still works 15 years later. The machinery still works almost any website if you just put /RSS or / feed on the domain name you'll see an RSS feed and you can subscribe to that so it goes into my reader app And then I've been building filters over the years. So I have filters like -Trump because I got sick and tired of all this bullshit about Trump regardless what you think about Trump I just wanted to think about other things and it was painful to have a feed filled with Trump during the election So I have also -Biden, I have -Kanye, I have -Disney, I have minus all kinds of shit that I don't want to see, I still follow the publishers, but it's weeding out articles that are about those things. And so I get this feed that's pretty curated for me and my interests, and I get more of the stuff I like and less of the stuff I don't like, but I'm responsible for the knobs and dials, I'm controlling the settings, and I get to have my own autonomy about what I think is cool and not cool. And if I don't want Hitler, I can easily just -Hitler. And what we did instead is we kind of signed up for this sort of, babysitter culture of having Facebook make those choices for us. And people not, taking responsibility for their own choices has put us in this situation where we just have an internet full of people want to blame somebody else for everything that they think is going wrong. What we need to do is, figure out a way to, shift the world back to RSS. And out of the walled garden. So that's my, that's where I'm at, and I have ideas about that. Ash: And it's interesting, go back to Delphi, So Delphi internet... Pablos: One of the first, before, before internet, this was like an ISP, like a, like AOL. Centralized ISP. Ash: Right. So, so Delphi was sold to Murdoch, to News Corp and, and then the founder, Dan Burns brought that back. He purchased it, he re acquired the company and then invited a couple of ragtag individuals, myself and, and Palle again, and Rusty Williams. Chip Matthes, and we had like, you know, a room with a VAX in the back. I was doing a lot of the stuff, but we were running forums. Dan had this crazy idea. It was like, Hey, what if you could just make your own forum? And this would be like way pre Facebook, it's like 97, 98. And 98, we started supplying that ability to websites. And the first one we did was a guy named Gil . And like we said to him, it's like, Hey Gil, like you guys really should have some forums, like, yeah, we totally should be. Wait, so how do we do that? And we wrote like a little contract, right? like the first, I think, business development contract that you could probably make. He was head of, , business development, eBay. Right. So he did that. I mean, he's very well known sort of angel kind of lead syndicate guy. Now I like an angel is for like for, for ages. Pablos: Oh, Penchina. I know who you're talking about. Yeah. Ash: We still have like the first document, you will do this. I will do this. I will give you a forum. You will use it for people to talk about, I don't know, the, the, their beanie baby or whatever they were selling back then. And the, the reality was that that took off and then we started supplying this technology, which we then enabled, we RSS enabled it, by the way, of course, at some point, right. When it was, when the, when the XML feeds were like ready to go, we upgraded from XML And then we, we, we took that and we said, all right, let's go, let's go for it. And at some point we're doing 30 million a month, 30 million people a month. Unique. We're like on this thing and we never governed. You could, you could go hidden, right? Kind of like your locked Instagram page versus not, but we didn't govern anything. Forums had moderators, they were self appointed moderators of that domain of, of madness. So if you didn't like that person's moderation, You know, like, all right, screw this guy. You know, like, I don't, I don't want to listen to you. You're crazy. And what we found, and this was the piece of data that I think that was the wildest. Servers are expensive back then. You actually have to have servers. Or in our case we were beating everyone else. Cause we had a VAX that was locked in a, Halon secure room. No, because it came when we repurchased it for a dollar. Like the VAX was still there and Lachlan Murdoch's, office became our like conference room. No, I'm not kidding. It was, it was really crazy. There was a, it was just a VAX sitting there and, Hey, look, you could run UNIX on it. We were good. We didn't care. It loved threads and it was good. And it could do many, many, many, many threads. So we were running this, this thing highly efficiently. There's six people in a company doing that much. That was the company, literally six. I look today and how many people we hire and I'm like, there were six of us. It was wild, the iceberg effect took place. So what ended up happening is the percent, and this is where I think Facebook can't do or doesn't want to do, is how do you advertise below the waterline? And when we were sitting there with the traffic, we're like, dude, why is there so much traffic, but we can't see it, right? It looked like we only had 20, 000 forums or something, and there was like all this mad traffic going on. And. It was something like the 80, 20 rule the other way. It was like 20 percent was indexable that you could see that you could join a forum. And it was 80 percent were, were insane things like Misty's fun house. That by the way, is a legitimate. Forum at one point, right? It was Misty's fun house. So I'm just saying, cause we're trying to figure out what was going on. Where were the people chatting and talking? And that's what we did. We let them bury themselves deeper and deeper and deeper. Usenet did that. If you just go back in time, what do you think BBSs were? It's the same. Pablos: Exactly. Ash: We always love talking. Pablos: Yeah. People love talking. Ash: You just figure out which one you want to dial into. Pablos: Nobody's pissed off about who they're talking to really. Usually they're pissed off about who other people are talking. They're pissed off about some conversation they're not really a part of. Or a conversation they can be a spectator on, but doesn't match their culture. That's one of the big problems with Twitter it's like BBSs, and it's BBS culture. Elon was the winner of the Twitter game long before he bought Twitter, because, that's just BBS culture that he had in his mind, IRC or whatever. All kinds of people who are not part of that culture, are observing it and think that it's a horrible state, of society that people could be trolling each other and shit. And that's just part of the fun. You have this problem when you try to cram too many cultures into one place, it takes a lot of struggle to work that out if you're in, Jamaica, Queens, then you're gonna, you're gonna work it out over time, with a lot of struggle, you're going to work it out and the cultures are going to learn to get along. But in, but on Twitter, there's no incentive. Ash: That's why we still have states. The EU still has, like, how many languages? That's why we have Jersey for New Yorkers. Pablos: The EU in their way has figured out how these cultures can get along. I think there's a real simple fix to this. The big death blow to RSS in some sense was that the winning reader app was Google Reader. And so the vast majority, of the world that was using RSS was using Google Reader. And then I don't totally have insight on how this happened, but, Google chose to shut down Google Reader. And I don't know if they were trying to steer people into their, Facebook knockoff products or whatever at the time. in a lot of ways I think what it did is it just handed the internet over to Facebook. Because anybody who was being satisfied by that, and just ended up getting, into their Facebook news feed instead. So it just kind of ran into a walled garden. I don't really blame Facebook for this, the way a lot of people want to. I blame the users. You've got to take some responsibility, make your own choice, choose something that's good for you, and most people are not willing to do that. But, I think to make it easier for them, and there is a case to be made that , people got better things to do than architect their own rSS reader process, but we could kind of do it for them. And so I think there's one, one big kingpin missing, which is you could make a reader app that would be like an iPhone app now. And you could think of it as like open source Instagram. It's just an Instagram knockoff, but instead of following, other people on a centralized platform by Instagram, it just follows RSS. And then it only picks up RSS posts that have at least one picture, right? So any RSS post that has one picture and then the first time you post it automatically makes a WordPress blog for you, that's free. And then, posts your shit as RSS compliant blog posts, but the reader experience is still just very Instagramesque. So now it's completely decentralized in the sense that like you own your blog, yeah, WordPress is hosting it, but that's all open source. You could download it, move it to Guam if you want, whatever you want to do. So now all publishers have their own direct feeds. All users are publishers, which is kind of the main thing that Facebook solved. Ash: Content is no longer handed over to someone, right? That's the other big thing. Pablos: Exactly. The content is yours and then your followers are yours, right? When they follow you, they follow you at your URL. And so you can take them with you wherever you go. And then to make this thing more compelling, you just add a few tabs. You add the Twitteresque tab. You add the TikTokesque tab for videos. And, add, the podcast tab. So now, posts are just automatically sorted into the tab for the format that matches them. Because people have different modalities for, for consuming this shit. So, depending on what you're in the mood for, you might want to just look at pictures because you're on a conference call. Fine. Instagram. Or, you know, you might want to watch videos because you're on a flight. Who knows? So, the point being, all of this is easy to do. You and I could build that in a weekend. And then the reason that this works, the reason this will win is because you can win over the creators, right? Because the sales pitch to a creator, and those are the people who drive the following anyway, you see TikTok and everybody else kissing the ass of creators because that's who attracts the following. The creators win because they're not giving anything up to the platform. Because they make money off advertising. So fine. We make an advertising business and we still, take some cut of what the creators push out. But if they don't like us, there's a market for that, right? The market is I'm just pushing ads out along with my content to my followers. Some of them watch the ads. Some of them don't. I have this much of an impact. And so now you get the platforms out of the way. Ash: If you do it right, Google has ad networks that they drop everywhere. Pablos: Everybody has ad networks already for websites. You could just use that. Amazon has one. So you can sign up for that if you want. Or the thing that creators want to do, which is go do collabs, go do direct deals with brands. Now you're getting 100 percent of that income. You pump it out to your fans. And there's no ad network in the middle. Nobody's taking a cut. Alright, if you could cut your own deals, then great, but you're in control and you can't be shadow banned, you can't be deprioritized in the feed, because that's the game that's happening. These platforms, they figure out you're selling something, you immediately get deprioritized. And so the creators are all pissed off anyway. So I think we can win them over easily enough. And then the last piece of it is, there's one thing that doesn't exist, which is you still need to prioritize your feed. You still need an advanced algorithm to do it. You don't want to be twiddling knobs and dials all day. You might put in -Hitler if you want. But what should happen is you should also be able to subscribe to feed ranking services. So that could be, the ACLU, or the EFF, or the KKK, whoever you think should be ranking your feed. Ash: Well, I was actually thinking you could subscribe to a persona. So people could create their own recipes. So this is the world according to Ash, right? Here you go. Like, I've got my own thing. I've done my dials, my tuning, my tweaks, my stuff. And you want to see how I see the world. Here we go. The class I teach, that's the first day I tell people, take Google news and sit down and start tuning it. And everyone's like, well, let me just start to just add, put ups and downs, ups and downs, add Al Jazeera, do whatever you want. Just do everything that you want, just make them fight and put all of that in and then go down the rabbit hole. But there's no way to export that. When we start class, I always talk about viewpoints And how all content needs a filter because we are filter. But if I want to watch the world as Pablos, I can't, there's no, you can't give me your lens. So if we look at the lens concept, today you can tune Google News, there is a little subscribe capability, but you could tune it and poke it a little bit, and it will start giving you info. It's not the same, quite the same as RSS, but it's giving you all the news feeds from different places, right? Could get Breitbart, you could get, Al Jazeera, you could get all the stuff that you want. And if you go back in time to, to when I was working with the government, that was actually my sort of superpower, writing these little filters and getting, Afghani conversations in real time translated. And then find the same village, in the same way. So then I would have two viewpoints at the same time. The good thing was that when you did that what I haven't seen, and I would love, love this take place, is for someone to build a, Pablos filter,? And I could be like, "all right, let me, let me go see the world the way he sees it." his -Hitler, his minus, minus, -election, - Trump, -Biden, that's fine. And then, and now I have a little Pablos recipe. I can like click my glasses, and then, then suddenly I see the world, meaning I filter the world through Pablos's. Pablos: Yeah, I think that, I think we're saying a similar thing because then what you could do is you could, subscribe to that. You could subscribe to the Pablos filter. You could subscribe to the... Ash: exactly, I'm taking your ACLU thing one step further. I think ACLU is like narrow, but you could go into like personality. Pablos: You could even just reverse engineer the filter by watching what I read. My reader could figure out my filter by seeing the choices that I make. Ash: Yeah, if it's stored it right, if we had another format, but let's just say that we had an RSS feed filter format. 'cause it's there. It's really the parameters of your RSS anyway. But if you could somehow save that, config file, go back thousand years, right? If you could save the config.ini, that's what you want? And I could be like, Hey, Pablo, so I can hand that over. Let's share that with me. And now what's interesting is works really well. And it also helps because each person owning their own content, the, the beauty of that becomes, you never, you never filtered, you never blocked you, you, you're self filtering. Pablos: That's right. Ash: We're self subscribing to each other's filters. Pablos: Publishers become the masters of their domain. If you've got a problem with a publisher, you've got to go talk to them, not some intermediary. The problem is on a large scale, control is being exercised by these intermediaries. And they have their own ideas and agendas and things. The job here is to disintermediate - which was the whole point of the internet in the first place - communication between people. Ash: Then the metadata of that becomes pretty cool, by the way. If I figured out that, okay, now it looks like 85 percent of the population has, has gone -Biden, -Trump. Let's think about that. Suddenly you've got other info, right? Suddenly you're like, Oh, wait a minute. and if you're an advertiser or you're a product creator, or you're a, like just sitting there trying to figure out how can I get into the world, that becomes really valuable, right? Because you could. Go in and say, people just don't give a shit about this stuff, guys. I don't know what you're talking about. Whereas when you have one algorithmic machine somewhere in Meta/Facebook, whatever we want to call it, pushing things up, it could be pushing sand uphill, right? It could be like stimulating things that you don't necessarily know you want. The structure that you just described flips that on its head because it says, Hey, I just don't want to listen to this shit, guys. Like, I just could not give a crap about what you're saying. Pablos: Right. Ash: And if enough people happen to do that, then the content creators also have some, some idea of what's going on. We try to decode lenses all day long,? We spend our life, like you said, in meetings or in collaborations or business development. What do you think we do? We sit there, we're trying to figure out the other person's view. We're trying to understand if you're a salesperson, "Hey, can I walk a mile in that guy's shoes" or speak like that person, I've never heard of anyone sort of selling me, lending me, letting me borrow their RSS, like, their filter. That would be phenomenal, that'd be great. And I bet you, if you did it right, you might even solve a lot of problems in the world because then you could see what they see, you know, I don't want to touch the topics that we know are just absolute powder kegs, but every time we get to these topics, I always tell the person, can you show me what you, what are you reading? Pablos: Yeah. Ash: Like, where did you get? Pablos: Yeah. Ash: You ever, you ever asked someone like, "where did you get that?" and then they show you, they show you kind of their, feed. And you're just like, what is going on? Like, if you, if you go to someone, whether they're pro or anti vax, it doesn't matter where it is. And just look at their feed, look at what they're listening to, because it's not the same thing I'm listening to, because the mothership has, has decreed which, which one we each get. But you look at it and then you're like, okay, maybe the facts that they were presented with were either incomplete and maybe not maliciously? I get it in the beginning of this, you started like, okay, is it malicious and didn't do it would get changed. But if you just cut out, I don't know, let's just say there's like 10 pieces of news, but I only give you five and I give the other person the other five. And they're not synchronous, you're going to start a fight. There's no question. What we don't have is the ability to say, Hey, like, let me, let me be Pablos for a second before I start screaming, let me see what he sees. that will probably change that could change a lot. Pablos: Think it could. That and certainly there's a cognitive bias that feels comfortable in an echo chamber. This is one of the issues that we're really experiencing is that, the process of civilization, literally means "to become civil" to do that. It's sort of the long history of humans figuring out how to control obsolete biological instincts. We've been evolved to want to steal each other's food and girlfriends. That's not specifically valuable or relevant at this point. We've had to learn how to get along with more people, we've had to learn to become less violent, we've had to learn to, play the long game socially, those things. And, there's work to do on that as far as like how we consume all this, this information, all the media. You're using the wrong part of your brain to tune your feed right now. You're using the lazy Netflix part of your brain to tune your news, and that's not really , how are you going to get good results. There's work to do to evolve the tools and work to do to evolve the sensibilities around these things. And so, you know, what I'm suggesting is like, we're not going to get there by handing it over to the big wall garden. You got to get there through this, again, sort of. Darwinian process of trying a lot of things and so you've described some really cool things that we'd want to be able to try that are impractical to try because things are architected wrong and using Facebook is the central switchboard of these conversations or Twitter or whatever and so you know what we need is a more open platform where like you know we can all take a stab at figuring out how to design cool filters that express our point of view and share them. And that's not possible in the current architecture. I think the last thing is, there are certainly other frustrations and attempts to go solve some class of these, some subset of these problems. You've got Mastodon, of course, and the Fediverse, and you've got Blue Sky trying in their way to make a sort of open Twitter thing. And then you've got, these other attempts, but a lot of them are pretty heavy handed architecturally. As far as I can tell, most of them end up just being some suburb of people who are pissed off about one thing or another that they get its adoption, right? So, Mastodon is basically a place for people who are, backlashing against Twitter. As far as I can tell. Ash: Yeah, and we even worked on one, right? Called Ourglass. Pablos: I don't know that one. Ash: It was coming out and we actually did an entire session on it. I actually worked on some of the product thought design on, on how that works. , it was like, it's all on chain. Part of the, the thing that, we did was very similar to what you're talking about. You wanted the knobs and the controls, and you wanted people to rant in their space. I know it gets pretty dark when you say, okay, but what are they allowed to talk about in in the dark depths of that sort of internet and and I say, "well, they already talk about it, guys" Whether they get into a smoky back room or, there's somewhere else that if they don't say it, I feel we get more frustrated. Pablos: The fundamental difference here is between centralized services. That's certainly Facebook and Twitter, but it's also Delphi and AOL, versus open, decentralized protocols and the protocols in time win over the services like TCP/IP won over AOL, AOL was centralized service, TCP/IP, decentralized protocol. At the beginning it was a worse user experience, harder to use, but It's egalitarian and it won and I think that that's kind of the moment we're in right now with with the social media. We're still on centralized service mode and it needs to be architected as decentralized protocol and we had a chance to do that before Facebook and we lost and so now there's just like the next battle is like how do we get back on the track of decentralized protocol, and I think if we just define them... That's why I think RSS won because it's called Really Simple Syndication for a reason. Because it's really simple. It was easy for any developer to integrate. Everybody could do it. And so it just became ubiquitous almost overnight. You could design something cooler with the blockchain and whatnot. But it's probably over engineered for the job. And the job right now is just like, get adoption. Ash: We started going down that path. So Delphi's sort of twin. Was, called Prospero. So Prospero was, little Tempest reference, was designed. As a way that you could just adopt it. That was that, that first eBay deal. And then we did about.com and most of the stuff. And right now you see Discuss. It's at the bottom of, of some comments. It's a supported service where, you had one party taking care of all of the threads and handles and display methods and posts and logins. And, you were seamlessly logged into the other sites. MD5 sort of hash and we did the first single sign on type nonsense, and we used to build gateways between the two, you're going to go from one to another, but the whole idea was that you provide, the communication tool, As a, as an open or available service. And you could charge for for storing it. And then what happens is you don't do the moderation as a tool. That's your problem. You strip it back to "look, I'm going to provide you the car and I don't care how you drive it." Go back to our story, whether you're in Vietnam or Riyadh or whatever you're doing, we're going to, we're not there to tell you which lane to go into, but that's, that's your problem. I think that one of the challenges with like RSS, cause we were RSS compliant, by the way. I'm pretty sure Prospero and I'm sure it's still around because it went XML to RSS. And I remember the fact that you could subscribe to any forum that was Prospero powered. You could subscribe to it a lot, like directly through your RSS reader. And I remember what was great about it is that people were like, "we don't want, your viewer." Just like we didn't want your AOL view of like, "you've got mail." I want my own POP server and then IMAP or whatever it is. I think there does need to be, like you said, someone putting together a little toolkit that's super easy. They don't need to know it's got RSS. They don't need to know anything. But it's like, "own your post." it can be like an Own Your Post service. And then the Own Your Post service happens to publish RSS and everything else, and it's compliant. Pablos: I think you just make an iPhone app and when you set up the app it just automatically makes you a WordPress blog and if you want you can go move it later. Ash: You got it. All that other stuff is just automated. Pablos: You don't even have to know it's WordPress. It's behind the scenes. Ash: If you were going to do this, what you would do is you'd launch and I would launch it like three different companies. Like three different tools. I've got a, "keep your content" tool and the keep your content guys are something compliant, RSS. You keep bringing it back. It's published, it's out there and then some new company, Meta Two, Son of Meta, creates a reader. Anyone that's got a RSS tag on it, we're a reader for it. So anyone using Keep Your Content or, whatever. the idea being that now you're showing that there's some adoption. You almost don't have to rig it. There is a way to do this because no one wants to download a reader if there aren't sources. Pablos: The thing can bootstrap off of existing sources because there's so much RSS compliant content. You could imagine like day one. If you downloaded this reader today. You could follow Wall Street Journal and just everything online. And some of it you have to charge for it. Like Substack has RSS. I follow Substacks. You could just follow those things in the app Substack has a reader, but it only does Substacks, and probably Medium has one that only does Medium. But we have one that does both, plus New York Times and everything else. So now, like any other thing, you just follow a bunch of stuff. And then, there's a button that's like post. Sure, post. Boom. Now that fires up your own WordPress blog. Now you're posting. All your content's being saved. You control it. You got some followers or if you have this many followers, here's how much you can make in ad revenue. Boom, sign up for ad network. Now you're pushing ads out. All This could be done with existing stuff, just glued together, I think, and with the possible exception of the filter thing, which, needs to be more advanced probably worth revisiting. Ash: I think what You could do is maybe the very first thing you do, create the filter company, like your RSS glasses. So instead of having to do that heavy lift, curate Pablos's, I would love to get your RSS feed list. How do you give it to me? How could you give me your RSS configured viewer? Pablos: A lot of RSS readers make it really easy to like republish your own feed. So like all the things I subscribe to, then go into feed... Ash: But then, that's blended, right? Pablos: Oh, it's blended. Yeah, for sure. Ash: Is blended, right? So now it becomes your feed. I'm saying, can I get your configuration? Pablos: I don't know if there's a standard for that. Ash: I'm saying that's maybe the thing you create a meta, Meta. Pablos: Honestly, I think these days what you would do is just have a process that looks at everything I read, feeds it into an LLM, and tries to figure out like how do you define what Pablos is interested in that way. You probably would get a lot more nuance. Ash: That's to find out what you're interested in. Pablos: It's almost like you want your feed filtered through my lens. Ash: That's exactly what I want. I want to read the same newspaper you're reading, so to speak. So if you assume that that feed that you get is a collection of stories. That's your newspaper, the Pablos newspaper, right? That's what it is, Times of Pablos and you have a collection of stories that land on your page, right? It's been edited. Like you're the editor, you're the editor in chief of your little newspaper. If you think of all your RSS feeds ripped down your, your own newspaper, I'd like to read that newspaper. How do I do that? That doesn't exist. I don't think that's easy to do. And if I can do that, that'd be great. Pablos: If you're looking on Twitter and people are reposting, if I go look at your Twitter feed and all you do is repost stuff and then occasionally make a snarky comment, that's kind of what I'm getting. I'm getting the all the stuff you thought was interesting enough to repost and I think that's a big part of like why reposting merits having a button in Twitter because that's the signal you're getting out of it. I don't love it because it's part of what I don't like about Twitter is I'm not seeing a lot of unique thought from the people I follow. I'm just seeing shit they repost. And so my Twitter feed is kind of this amalgamation of all the things that were reposted by all the people I follow and and to me, that's what I don't want. I would rather just see the original post by those people. Twitter doesn't let me do that, so I'm scrolling a lot just to get to the, first person content. I think it is a way of substantiating what you're saying, though, which is "There's a value in being able to see the world through someone else's eyes." Repost might just be kind of a budget version of that. Ash: The reason I say that it's valuable, it's like the old days you'd sit on train and maybe even today and you had a physical copy of the New York Times, and everyone, and you could see who reads the New York Times and who reads the Journal. Right. And who reads The Post and The Daily News, that's what you can tell. And those people had their lenses, you go to the UK and everyone, this is the guardian, the independent, whatever. And you were like, Oh, that's a time, Times reader. That's a Guardian reader or someone looking at page three of the sun. I have no idea what they're doing, but, you knew immediately where they were. Pablos: It's the editorial layer. Ash: You got it. Pablos: it's what's missing in today's context. What's missing now is you got publishers, and you got the readers. but the editor is gone. Ash: Well, it's not gone, that's the problem, right? So what we did is , in the, in the world of press, there was a printing press and an editorial group took stories and they shoved them through the printing press. And then, the next minute, another editorial group came in and ran it through the printing press. so if you went out , and you were making your sort of manifestos, the printing press probably didn't care, right? The guy at like quickie print or whatever it was didn't care. Today, Facebook claims it's the place to publish, but it's not. Because it's editorial and publish so that so what they're doing is they're taking your IP They're taking a content and then there's putting their editorial layer on it. Even if it's a light touch or heavy touch, whatever it is. But it's sort of like if the guy that was the printing press like "I don't really like your font." " Dude, that's how I designed it." I want the font. Like I like Minion, Minion Pro is my thing, right? That's what I'm going to do. But, but if they just decided to change it, you'd be really pissed off. Now, Facebook claims to be an agnostic platform, but they're not an ISP. They're not a, an open architecture. like we would have had in the past where like you host what you wanted to host. There, you host what you want to host, but they're going to down promote you. They're going to boost you. They're going to unboost you. So wait a minute, hold on a second. You're, you're not really an open platform. And I think that's what you're getting at, which is, either you're a tool to publish or you're the editorial, the minute you're both. You're an editorial. You're actually no longer a tool. Pablos: That's exactly right. I think, that's the key thing, we've got to separate those things. Ash: That's the element. And I think that that tells you a lot about why we get frustrated. If Twitter was just a fast way to shove 140 characters across multiple SMS, which we didn't have, because we're in the U.S. We were silly and we didn't have GSM. That's what Twitter was, right? Twitter was kind of like the first version of like a unified messaging platform. Cause it was like, you could broadcast 140 characters and it would work on the lowest common denominator, which was your StarTAC flip phone. So the point was that Twitter was a not unmoderated open tool. Then it got editorial. And now it's then it's no longer. And I think that's the problem, right? It used to be, you had a wall on Facebook and you did whatever the hell you wanted to. And then Facebook said I need to make money and it became the publisher, became the editorial board. Pablos: Okay, so we have a lightweight plan to save the internet. Let's see if we can find somebody to go build this stuff. Ash: If you could build that last thing, I think it's not a, it's not a complicated one, but they, I think they just need to sit down and, grab your feed. Or someone can come up with a collection of, Mixtapes, let's call it. Pablos: Yeah, cool. Mixtapes, I like that. Ash: Internet Mixtapes. There you go.

Pablos: So what happens right now in scientific research is, if you're going to do a research study on something, like "are M&Ms is bad for you?" It's impossible to do that study. You have to be very specific and ask a much more fine grained questions like " how many M&Ms does it take to, Kill a mouse?" or to cause a mouse to vomit. You just have to be very specific cause that's something testable. You could test that, you can get multiple mice, you can feed them enough M&M's that they eventually vomit. The whole research study can be done that way. And so when you read scientific research studies, that's typically what you're looking at is some very narrowly defined thing that they believe is correlated to a much more significant or bigger effect, but you can't test the whole thing. You can't ask questions like, "does this thing cause cancer?" You can ask questions like, " does this amount of exposure to this thing over this much time cause this specific, type of cancer in this type of rat?" Things like that. So that's great and all because it means, we're structuring, tests that we can actually perform, but the downside is that for most people, what they would actually like to know is " do M&Ms cause cancer or how many of them is too much, things like that. Getting those answers is often not straightforward from scientific literature. And so the way that we. usually try to compensate for that is to do what's called a meta analysis. And a meta analysis is where somebody will go and dig up all of the studies on a given topic, combine them and try to say, "across a hundred studies involving M&Ms and cancer, this is kind of what happened" and, to just sort of give you a general sense of whether or not, the effect you're interested in is happening. Good examples of this are like, chiropraction is largely, debunked. A lot of people get pissed off at me talking about it because it can be a deluxe placebo, but in clinical trials, very few clinical trials are performed. It's hard to do them. Different practitioners have, different effectivity levels anyway. And so the problem is it's hard to run those studies, but even if you do, you can't find any indication that chiropraction actually cures anything. So this is a case where we don't have good research and the only way to try and get to the bottom of it is with a meta analysis where you find the studies that have been done and you sort of combine their results and try to say whether or not chiropraction works. People, there's no point arguing with me if you're listening and you think chiropractic is great. Go nuts. I encourage you not to do that, but, whatever, do your own thing. But the point is the only way you could get a reasonable answer is with this kind of meta analysis. Now meta analysis is very time consuming and difficult to perform and often isn't getting done, but what it really involves is just go read a bunch of studies. Well, it turns out that's what an LLM is really fucking good at. So you, so right now we're in a stunted position because one of the big problems with OpenAI and ChatGPT is they've crippled ChatGPT. It doesn't read scientific literature and even if it does, it's not really allowed to comment on it. So they've crippled the thing to keep you from talking to it about anything that might be health related and stuff like that. What you would really want an LLM to do, and one of the things that would be really good at is doing ad hoc meta analysis. So you could just say, "Hey, I feel like I'm getting a cold, should I take zinc?" There's people marketing zinc for that purpose. We've all been told to take zinc, but I don't fucking know if that's an old wives tale, Ash: It's like echinacea, zinc, doesn't matter, it's all those things. Pablos: I don't have time to go read every scientific research study, but I bet you collectively we have that answer, and so if I could just ask an LLM. Ash: Wasn't wasn't IBM's Watson at some point pretty good? Watson Health actually had all this. Pablos: That's probably what they were trying to do. Ash: They were doing it and they were doing pretty well. They weren't they weren't using a full LLM model. That's that was the whole breakthrough. Pablos: They were kind of in the pre LLM days. It was LM. It was just LM. It wasn't LLM. Ash: Just language models. And they were taking huge amounts of data. But what they had is they had their own normalized structures underneath. So that was the difference, right? They didn't let the structure form itself. But what you're saying is true. Pablos: You're right, and we could probably build like a Watson for health in a weekend now using, Stable Diffusion or something. It would be way better. You would just basically load it up with all the research and let it go nuts and then let people ask questions like, " Hey, should I be taking zinc?" Ash: The problem is reliability score. Pablos: Oh no, it'd be terrible, but it's already horrific. Right now, we're just going off superstition. I mean, literally that question of, should I take zinc? You're gonna get as many answers as people you ask because somebody's Chinese grandmother said You should be, taking echinacea instead. Ash: You should listen to my first class. The first part we were talking about is what is known as "triangulation of information truth." What is provenance for data. Then you have to figure out, how do you weigh it? LLMs are fantastic, like you said, because they can take all your source inputs. So if you go back to, to signal analysis, or analytics for like intelligence again. We'll just lean on that for a moment. Truth is great if you're playing with mathematics. You get QED and you call it a day for the most part. But for other things, truth, zinc, for example, like your zinc example. There's some balance between like how much did it really? Was it an emotional support protocol? Did it help you because you were convinced that, your grandmother was right or whatever's happening to, to actual physical actions internally, right? We can be scientific about it, but it comes back to source and information. If you pick a really, really dangerous topic and we won't go there, but let's just pick Gaza for one second. How do you find what's really happening? Well, you hear a lot and someone's like, "well, I read it in the Wall Street Journal." I read it here. I heard it there. I took Al Jazeera. I did Briebert. Whatever you picked. The question was, did you do it in all the languages? Did you listen to a local radio station? Did you find someone's signal data from nearby? What was happening? Did the bomb go off or did this happen? If you look at information, just like you're looking at these scientific papers, the question becomes the weighting factor. We as humans, I think one of the things we know how to maybe do, at least a good analyst should be able to do, is try to give weighting based on time and location and stuff. And I think the large language models have to start to put in context again. I think they have to add one more dimension. Pablos: For sure. And I think that you touched on the other thing, which is that right now, all this information is like floating around without, tracking provenance, and so, interestingly, like in scientific research, you at least have citations. which is a lightweight form of provenance. It's a start, but ultimately, the way these things all need to be built, not only , the LLMs for doing meta analysis, but really every knowledge graph needs to be built off of assertions that are tracked. You keep track of provenance, okay the sky is blue, well, who said the sky is blue? Where did you get that from? And that way, whenever you're ingesting some knowledge, it's coming with a track record. That's how we're going to solve news online, eventually. Ash: Kind of like, the Google Scholar score or whatever. I go back to my partner, to Palle, right? So Palé actually has a patent. It's probably expiring soon, so for those of you who want to do this, we should go do it. He owns webprovenance.com. And he owns the patent on how you check provenance. One of the things that came out of the BlackDuck software stuff was that at BlackDuck, we needed to know who created something. So do you remember the Sun Microsystems, IBM, lawsuit, Java? If you're a compiler theorist, then you know that, just because West Side Story takes place in New York, You could probably say, well, doesn't it sound exactly like, Romeo and Juliet? So maybe you change the variables, but it's the same stuff. And the idea was that when we were looking at, open source, with open source, the interesting thing is you're trying to figure out, where did this little rogue piece of code, this little GPL or LGPL infection come from? You need to find it. So it's one thing to talk about the combinatorials, but the other was to find it. And then Palle was like, well, I can do something cooler., He said, if Brewster Kahle's Way Back Machine, remember the original Alexa project? So If you could go in and take all that data, he's like, I could pretty much tell you like who killed JFK. You can find the provenance of almost any information. He wrote this wild algorithm for it. I'd love to see some of that incorporated into the LLM stuff because that algorithm, and again, we would happily, anyone out there if you're willing, this has been a project we've been looking at for the better part of 15 years. Pablos: Well Stability might pick it up. They love that kind of stuff, that would be a huge coup for them. Ash: Well, we should, we should have this conversation offline, but it's a, it's interesting. It's an incredibly cool algorithm. He was a compiler theorist anyway, an algorithmist, at Thinking Machines. So, he always wondered where the info came from. And I sat there and said, hey, we should find a way. And I remember the stunt I wanted was like, to figure out if they were aliens. And he's like, what do you mean? It's like, well, who started that rumor? Like, where did it happen? Right? So, imagine you could take any rumor, and I can tell you how it started. Pablos: That's so cool. Ash: Wouldn't that be the coolest thing ever? Pablos: So important. Ash: Yeah, and we need that. Pablos: That is super important. I've seen somewhere, a map that somebody made of where are all the UFO sightings reported? And like 98 percent of them are in the United States. I think the rest of the world doesn't even have UFO as like a notion. it's not even a, thing for them. Ash: It's cause we have no healthcare. Look, all I know is, years ago, we just didn't have enough data. Years ago, we couldn't. We were like, looking at the Wayback Machine, and we were like, I was like, well, who can we go to to get all the data? Can we get the entire web? Today, large language models have already stolen all the data. They already have it. So if you have enough of the data, we could definitely help you figure out the algorithm to go backwards and it's complicated. Pablos: That's super exciting. Ash: He actually patented it himself because he was trying to figure out if he didn't need a patent attorney. So that was his project, can I make a patent? And his patents on provenance. So I think it's a big coup if they could pull it off. Can you imagine you could just type in who started, where did this first start? Pablos: Dude, that's crazy cool. Ash: It's super cool. Pablos: I'm kind of always on a rant about this, but we need a variety of models. Like LLM is the beginning, not It's a thing that you need, like the way we're doing it now actually kind of sucks and requires a lot of brute force, but there's so many things that it's not good for. Ash: And it's so susceptible to the thing that, what did I do in my life? Psych warfare is all about information corruption. Dude, you corrupt a large language model, that thing is convinced that the sky is red at that point. Pablos: Exactly, well, I've been thinking about that. Why don't I just.. Ash: Corrupt it?. We're bad hackers. Pablos: I can fire up, 100,000, blogs written by an LLM that all just talk about my, prowess with the ladies. Ash: Exactly. Pablos: And the next thing you know, all the future LLMs will be trained on a massive amount of data that indicates that, Pablos is the man. Why wouldn't we do that? Ash: At the end of the day, the LLMs are basically superstition. There you go. I've just said it. Pablos: Right. They're superstition. There you go. Ash: LLMs are superstition. They're based on some concept of something that it derived because it took a whole lot of information from a lot of grandmothers. Pablos: And that's the thing, Like what's posted on the internet is all that they know. It's driving me crazy. Ash: Worse, it's only the people who have given them permission, so the quality sources are going to start cutting them off. So, all they've got, all you've got are the people who are generating rumors that they've seen UFOs. Pablos: Well, that's all true for the LLMs made in America. Ash: Yeah, so the American LLMs know where the UFOs are. Pablos: Japan decided that copyright doesn't apply to training LLMs. So the most powerful LLMs, for now, are gonna be in Japan. Sign me up. Ash: Even better, that means Japanese information... Pablos: That's probably true, learn Japanese. Ash: Which, think of it, if I wanted to build, my 100,000 LLMs generating your prowess, I'm gonna do it all in Japanese. I'll do kanji, hiragana, and katakana. I'll give it to them in all three formats. You could crush it. I I would love to see any of these. I think that's, that should be our ask for everyone. Pablos: Yeah. Ash: if someone, someone wants to run with it, go build it. Pablos: Yeah, people, build this shit. Ash: Tell us. We can help you commercialize. We will find you.

Palle überdenkt seine Entscheidungen beim Hausbau und trifft eine Wahl bezüglich seines zukünftigen Autos. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Pablos: Here's the dumbest thing in the world. You pull up to an intersection, the light is red, there's no one else in sight and you have to sit there and wait for it to turn green. Traffic lights are the dumbest thing in the world. And this is insufferable because right now, if you, if you're in a Tesla, the Tesla knows, Oh, no one's coming from any other direction. It would totally be safe to go, but you can't because the light is red. I think what somebody needs to do is rip the guts out of a Tesla, mount them in a traffic light and let the traffic light decide when it should be green or red. How hard is this? This is easy to do. it's going to take years to upgrade traffic lights, but that's at least one startup. Somebody should be able to do that. We have all the tech, it's not that hard. We can use vision or radars or whatever. Ash: You're not gonna believe me. So, funny enough, uh, Columbus, Ohio. Project, Pre- Razorfish, Traffic Lights. Pablos: Wait, that's a real, that's a real project? Ash: It's a real thing! It's a real Pablos: Wait, so somebody did this in Columbus? Ash: No, us! Pablos: Oh, you did this? Ash: is what we were doing! Pablos: Wait, Ash: You couldn't have possibly known that! Pablos: No, I didn't. No, seriously, you, you, you worked on a project like this. I didn't know. Ash: I mean, yeah, so, yeah, so what was interesting is that project was, so I keep hired to figure out traffic light optimization and it's, you know, it's really, really fucking complicated. Like there's a lot of math to, to make sure that, you know, you know, like that. To get people going in one direction and all that stuff and, that problem was being solved. And one of them was, do you start going flashy? Back then they didn't have the little Tesla thing. Right. Pablos: What year was this? Ash: Do you start flashing? It's gotta be like 1995, 1996. How do you, how do you optimize the sequence of lights so that, the traffic keeps flowing? What do you do with intercepts? And then Palle, this is even, this is even better. So Palle Peterson, like my partner, Palle's dad was a crazy, mad genius inventor, he was in the Western part of, of Denmark. He wasn't even in like regular Denmark. There's like an Island that they kept him on. He had convinced them that when ambulances go, that they could start to change the lights faster, like emergency services. Of course he had the hack, but so you would just click the lights to green. Pablos: Cause he had one of those transmitters that the ambulances have? Ash: First he invented it. Pablos: Yeah, I had, the MERT. Oh, that thing. I bought one of those and put it in my car, where I was in Seattle at the time, it only worked on the emergency corridors, only on certain roads where they had, where the ambulances knew, and I didn't know were set up for that. It's like an infrared transmitter you put in your car and it sends infrared signal to like a TV remote to the, traffic light and they change. I could smoke it around town on certain streets. So you're saying this guy invented the thing? Ash: Yeah, he invented, whatever the original one. I remember Palle telling me stories like, "dad had designed this thing" and then he convince them that they should all use it and then of course, like, " I have back door." So Columbus, the biggest problem they had was, they just had traffic lights, like each section was on its own. It didn't live in like a, a grid or it didn't have any understanding. So the ripple effects were just fucking out of control. For example, you could have a place where you're sitting there with a red light and then there's no one around you.. then you could have another place where, because it was doing its own thing, you could just be in stop and go, it would just create its own eddies of, of hell. Pablos: Yeah, it feels like that still exists. Ash: It does because what the problem is, is that no one is running enough, you know, computational fluid dynamics, I mean, that's the problem. Pablos: You'd do a simulation now. Ash: You would, and that's, and, and, and the horsepower gets better now, right? We have more flops to like mess around with this stuff. But the problem is that we, we still haven't figured out how to do your thing, which is now what happens when you build the emergency corridor. What happens if you're like, all right, so the Tesla says no one's coming from any side, but. You go through. Are you like a leaky pipe? Go back to like traffic theory, and pipe theory. One of the things that you have is that when you got a pipe, everyone thinks that, let's, let's call it. , the 405, let's call the pipe, 405. What's the best way to set up the 405, in terms of traffic, is it better to have six lanes, or is it better to have two sets of three lanes and a shoulder or two shoulders and it turns out, that the eddies are the problem. So,, we get these lame attempts of traffic light, traffic flow regulator, right? We have to go into the. Highway. So I was just thinking that when you, when you started talking about traffic lights, I was thinking problem is in theory, it sounds amazing, but the problem is when you're inside a mesh. Pablos: So you need active feedback loops into whatever the thing is that's running the simulations, right? Because you need to say, "okay, this guy wants to change the light to green because there's no traffic around. We can give him 30 seconds to do that and then go back without messing up the synchronization." Or, all this could get a lot more sophisticated. Ash: No, exactly. But I think that's the key. Right. So I think it's more like, can you get a brain that's dynamic, and right now the brain is not. Pablos: I presume there's not much of a brain and it's not a very advanced area, Ash: It's a non dynamic brain. Pablos: One cloud SaaS company could be making the brain for traffic and sell it to every city. Another company could be making the, Tesla traffic light that just knows how to see if there's any cars around. Ash: That's security problem, Pablos: Why is that? Oh, if it's centralized, you mean? Ash: There's a quote from a person that let's just say I met. An agency called RAW. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_and_Analysis_Wing) RAW is fantastic. That said, yeah, what happens when 2 minutes before an invasion, all lights go red? An invasion or attack or whatever, all lights go red. Pablos: I don't know, This is one of these old People have been saying, what if hackers shut down the traffic lights for, decades, and the only time it ever happened meaningfully was in the fucking movies. So, I, I don't buy it. If all the lights go red, then people just start going the way they do in Southeast asia. Ash: Then, and suddenly we're like in Beirut. Pablos: I kind of think that's how they should do it anyway. I was driving in Riyadh a couple of weeks ago, in Riyadh, the lines are painted, but they're irrelevant. Yeah. It's a free for all. And what I realized is that it's actually kind of better because, in the U. S. everybody's been coddled. They got lanes for this and that, they got the turbo or not turbo lane, I wish. They have a handicap lane and HOV lane and, bus lane, all these different lanes. And then, you got to be a lawyer to read the parking signs. So everyone's being coddled all the time. You could probably drive with your eyes closed in a lot of American cities because, everybody's following the rules. But if someone goes out of bounds, then they're going to cause a real problem. If you're in Riyadh, everybody's driving at maximum speed all the time. There are no lanes. People are swerving all the time. You got to be on the ball. You couldn't hit somebody if you were trying. If you literally tried to hit somebody with your car, they would evade you because they're all doing evasive driving all the time. Ash: It's, it's all, it's all offensive driving. Pablos: It's all offensive. I'd like to, I'd like to see the numbers. I don't know if we have good data on safety. It's Ash: interesting. So we were in Vietnam, and you go to Vietnam and it's a sea of random mopeds. Sometimes, you have the one person in the moped, the best is when you have at least five, right? The whole family. On the moped, you have mother, father, two kids. Then the baby kind of like strapped on like a, koala bear something. That's, that's when, you know, it's, it's, it's getting crazy. And what they were saying, it's like, yeah, "you're not going to get hit. Walk across the road." I was like, "what do you mean?" "Just walk across the road." And it's like, it's like you walk across. They said "we operate in a stream." They flow around you. Pablos: Nobody wants to hit you either. Ash: Yeah, but it is also a bit slow motion.. So there is a little bit more like speed. Pablos: A few days ago, I was in Shenzhen. They have, an absurd number of electric scooters. Because they've outlawed gas scooters. So everything is electric scooters. You ride them on the sidewalk. So it feels a little sketchy because there's a lot of fast moving electric scooters and not, they're not like little Bird scooters. They look like, Honda scooters or something. They're big, but the whole town, it's kind of clean and quiet in that sense. Overall they still have work to do, but the scooters are mellow. It's all quiet. It's, it's busy. There's a lot of people, but it's not noisy because today, now I'm in Bangkok and in Bangkok it's, they got all the gas scooters that China was getting rid of. And so they're just going full tilt on these, gas scooters with no muffler, no, no catalytic converter, nothing. And it's just noisy as hell. It's crazy. And I don't know. I kind of like it. I like the entropy. Ash: I do have to say that I, if you look at it, Vietnam felt the safest. Specifically Ho Chi Minh Saigon, it was the safest of the crazy, So that, that, that felt good. I mean, Beirut was just a whole different story. Like Beirut, it definitely, and I think it was my CTO who at the time was driving me around and I was like, yeah, I'm pretty sure Antoine, this is the oncoming traffic. He goes, "yeah, that's why there's no one going the same way as us." Like, "because they're coming at us," it was like, his logic was flawless. Right. So at that moment, I was sort of like, it's true. We don't have anyone going the same way as us. Cause we're in the fucking oncoming traffic lane. He had made the fourth lane, which was go at, like, it worked, so I don't know what to say. Yeah, I mean, they went, they went beyond lanes, the lanes were just like like you said, they're, they're paint on the road there. All right. So that was traffic lights for, for the last 30 minutes. Pablos: Obviously traffic lights aren't going to work there. Okay. I have another idea, which is related. So, the fleet of deployed Teslas is massive, like in most U. S. cities anyway, maybe other places. And Teslas are driving around all the time. And they could probably figure out, like within some window of accuracy, where all the open parking spots are. Like they're probably not looking for it now, but Teslas are just driving around. They see where the open parking spots are. And so if they were trying. They could just aggregate that data and tell you like, "Oh, you're looking for a parking spot. Here's the nearest one because a Tesla drove by it 12 seconds ago." You see what I mean? Ash: Interesting. Pablos: That'd be a superpower for teslas. Ash: That's, that's, that's, that would be great. I mean, that's like, that's like Spot Hero on crack. Pablos: Yeah. Who wouldn't buy that car? Oh, you could buy a Kia. Or if you get a Tesla, it'll tell you where the fucking parking spot is at. Ash: Yeah. So it'll tell you the next, the next location. I like that. The thing that you have to figure out is how do you save it? Pablos: Well, You wouldn't know for sure. The things could sense in any spot they have a sight line to that could see is it is it empty? Is it staying empty? Is somebody pulling into it? You could maybe make statistical probabilities for different streets. Stuff like that. Ash: It definitely helps when you're doing the parking lot, shuffling, just going around and around and around. And then, you just hope that, that someone pulls out right. What a Tesla could do is could wait for the next Tesla. Pablos: Mm hmm. Oh, yeah. There you go. Now we're talking. There you go. Tesla baton. They're doing that, with their, charging stations anyway. Tesla drivers are playing a video game where they're like, You know, waiting for a, for a charging supercharger spot so you could, you could do that. And then there's, yeah, I like that one. I think it would be useful though, even if you just, you know, it knows where you're trying to drive to and it could figure out like, okay, you're going to have a real parking problem in that area. Street parking is a lost cause. Ash: But if there are four Teslas there. Pablos: It's hard for a Tesla to know when somebody's going to leave. Ash: It does, because the preconditions 10, 15 minutes, see, like, if you set departure time on your Tesla, because you were preconditioning or Pablos: Oh, why Would you do that? My car doesn't know when I'm going to leave. I guess you could. You could gamify it. This guy's got a meeting. At 3 o'clock, so he's gonna have to leave by 2. 45, so probably there's gonna be an empty spot here. I don't know, maybe. Might be possible. Ash: I don't know that you're going to synchronize with the calendar, but I mean, that could be kind of cool, but I'm just saying that there's definitely precondition, which, which you're supposed to do. So if you're plugged in at home, right. Or, but like any of these chargers, there's like a precondition so that your car is warmer and like ready and like all that crap, right? Like they've been doing that for some time. Pablos: Oh, I see, oh, I see what you mean, right. I get it. I get it. So, so I don't drive a Tesla, but what, but precondition you're saying is like, I'm going to go. So warm up the car or cool off the car. Ash: So fancy cars do that, but also when the electric cars came in, the batteries have to have like been revved or whatever. Pablos: There's a thermal window Ash: Or, or set them up. Pablos: I see. Ash: You got it. Right. So that's why they want to know when you're leaving. That way you're not, you're not cold driving your, your Tesla. Pablos: Yeah. Ash: So that means they know, right? So if you want maximum range, they've got to like do that little thermal thing inside to get the battery, like not, minus five or whatever the hell it is outside. So, so they already know. So in cold places, this would work well. Pablos: Intriguing. Okay, so there's another idea, at least for Tesla if not a startup.

Che cosa c'è nel nuovo PNRR e che cosa ci sarà in Q*. Oscar Giannino, Don Chisciotte, ne parla con Carlo Alberto Carnevale Maffé, Ronzinante, e Renato Cifarelli, Sancho Panza.Per supportarci potete farlo quiwww.donchisciottepodcast.itSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join us in Bangkok for the Extraordinary Travel Festival in November of 2024.  Please use code - BANGKOK - to save $120.  . Want to go to Bhutan?  I am pleased to announce a new speaker, who will be speaking about her experience on a multi-week homestay in Mogadishu. The next guest is Palle Bo, .  Palle attended the first ETF and is coming back for the second one. And our last guest is a first-time attendee to ETF Bangkok, Mike Fiorellino at YouTube creator at . Have you bought a ticket to ETF or are confident you will be attending?  We want to hear from you to make this event even better, please take several minutes and .  Thanks!

Kristin welcomes semi-retired nomadic entrepreneur, globetrotter, and radio host, Palle Bo, back to the show for the first time in 5 years. Also known as The Radio Vagabond, Palle has traveled to at least 115 countries since leaving his career, home, and old life behind in Denmark. In this open and candid conversation, he shares his travel tips, insights, and challenges with you, as well as how he has so much energy for perpetual travel!   SPECIAL OFFERS:  Save money on car rentals with DiscoverCars.com. Get a new travel or laptop bag or carry-on at Minaal. Subscribe to Kristin's weekly e-mail list. Join Patreon for $5 to be a part of our next Live Call & Hangout, happening on Sunday, Sept 24, 2023.   Listen to Palle's previous interview about Becoming a Digital Nomad in your 50s.   Connect with Palle:  Listen to his amazing podcast Follow him on Instagram   Connect with Kristin and Support the Show: *   Become a Patron *   Buy a Coffee *   Follow on Instagram *   Join the Facebook Group *   Leave a 5-Star Review *   Subscribe on YouTube   See the show notes pages on BadassDigitalNomads.com or TravelingwithKristin.com/podcast  for time stamps, transcripts, and more resources from this episode.