Podcasts about ERT

Reports indicate that President Trump and members of his administration are looking for ways to circumvent or lift CAATSA sanctions and put arms sales, particularly of F-35 jets, back on the table with Turkey. They are coming up against a challenge that is significantly more complex than simply waiving sanctions. Lena Argiri, the DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis as we look into why CAATSA may not be the real obstacle standing in the way of Turkey and the F-35s.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:CAATSA sanctions not the real obstacle between Turkey and the F-35 programTurkey is not acting like a US ally, say AJC and HALC chiefsGreece hooks up undersea power link to Crete that's key to Mediterranean expansionTurkey's Erdogan appoints legal team to draft new constitution, sparking fears of extended rule

Vor der Bahnnetz-Ausbau in Basel starten kann, braucht es Ertüchtigungsbauten. Diese sollen die Ausbauprojekte für das Herzstück ermöglichen. Ein solches Projekt ist beispielsweise ein Tiefbahnhof beim Bahnhof SBB, zu diesem Schluss kommt eine Studie des Bundes. Ausserdem: - Mehr Hotelübernachtungen in Basel

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog Are you menopausal and have any of the following symptoms? Hot Flashes Night Sweats Dry Vagina Painful intercourse Dry skin Lack of sex drive Lack of motivation Fatigue Depression and or anxiety Change in body composition, with fat collection in the abdomen Loss of Muscle Mass and strength Irritability Inability to remember names and places Decreased ability to problem solve Insomnia Arthritis Body pain These are all symptoms we currently are aware of associated with menopause and low testosterone.  These symptoms can be treated and reversed with bioidentical estradiol and testosterone pellets. Menopause should be treated like an illness that is universal but more severe in some women compared with others.  If your symptoms affect your lifestyle, relationships and work then you should see a doctor who treats hormone deficiency and accept treatment! However, if you allow yourself to be manipulated by a male-dominated medical system that teaches all doctors to believe that menopause is normal as women age and don't seek out hormone replacement, then you just may be setting yourself up for years of symptoms that are treated with handfuls of medications, but never get you back to normal. Just think about this for a minute: Men develop erectile dysfunction and experience muscle loss as they age, but medicine doesn't consider ED or Sarcopenia a natural aging process for men, they advocate and endorse treatment with testosterone, ED medications, injections for ED and therapy for ED, and in most cases pay for it!  If the male mentality would include women we would all be treated with estrogen and testosterone when we got to age 50 (or menopause). It is not just about the symptoms that E-T replacement can cure, but the diseases that you can avoid by taking estrogen and testosterone after menopause.  These avoidable diseases of aging include: Osteoporosis leading to broken bones and spinal stenosis. Heart disease and stroke Diabetes Alzheimer's Dx and dementia Obesity Low muscle mass and inability to walk or move independently. Autoimmune diseases Loss of blood flow to Lower extremity, resulting in amputations and inhibiting walking and running Severe arthritis Gout Worsening depression and anxiety Frailty which is what causes most older people to be placed in a nursing home. Just think it is not fate that gives you these conditions.  It is genetics plus lifestyle plus whether you replace your sex hormones or not! This decision is in your control.  If you really want a life free of debilitating disease and symptoms that are require constant medical care, then you must buck the system (that was designed to keep us from maintaining our mind and body) and look for a doctor to replace your testosterone and estradiol in a non-oral delivery system and maintain it for life. By stopping ERT or Testosterone like the ACOG doctors tell you to, you will start the symptoms all over again.  My job is to offer you the right type of help to reverse the effects of menopause…both symptoms and diseases. Your job is to decide whether you want to get help and become healthy by taking non-oral estrogen and testosterone for the rest of your life. Think of menopause as a disease and you will be more prepared to fight for your right to be treated by the medical system.

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog There is a new federal rule for lab companies that requires them to report your blood tests to you as soon as they are finished, often even before your doctor has seen them.  This rule, deemed unreasonable, was established by individuals without medical expertise (politicians), who know little about interpreting lab data or the workings of doctor's offices. Sending your lab results to you before doctors can assess them is not a decision rooted in sound medical practice but rather in the notion of individual freedom. While this is important, it does not compare to having an expert interpret your results with you. The law requiring that your lab results be sent to you as soon as they are completed does not consider the fact that these results are not designed for laymen to interpret. Additionally, lab results are meant to be analyzed alongside a patient's medical history, age, gender, and medications.  The results are not tailored to report information specific to your situation, which is how a doctor would interpret them. Lab results often lack layperson-friendly explanations. This new protocol can cause anxiety, as patients may panic over results that appear abnormal, even if they are normal for their specific medical condition and treatment. Furthermore, lab companies only request your age and gender. The factors that doctors evaluate when interpreting your results are diverse and numerous, each influencing the overall interpretation. What are the considerations that doctors add to their interpretation? Menopausal status Medical conditions Healthy normal for young and healthy adults The newest recommended ranges for health Body weight Other lab values seen on the same report The problem with you getting your own lab and interpreting it as written is multifactorial: The lab is sent to you digitally with very little explanation except for reference ranges. There is no information about who you are being compared to. Other women, both men and women? Old women? Young women? Women with symptoms or women who are well without symptoms.  The reporting of the lab results to a patient directly may hide problems that need action or create fears that are unnecessary. Anxiety over your results will continue until your doctor's appointment to discuss … so you may experience unnecessary worry in many circumstances. Reference ranges make many assumptions, but labs don't input vital information about you into their computer. your age of menopause, your weight your height (or BMI) previous illnesses and your medications. if you are on hormones or testosterone   Here is a good example. The test for pituitary hormones FSH and LH. When a woman aged 45 is menopausal, and has a very high FSH and LH, the lab says it is “normal” (in the reference range), yet the woman is having severe hot flashes, night sweats, anxiety, and insomnia.  That is not healthy or “normal”. The same two tests can be used to determine if a person is menopausal. Let's say a 42-year-old woman has elevated FSH and LH, but her estradiol is very high (200-300). To the layperson, this looks like menopause, but in reality, it is the picture of ovulation, not menopause. One has to look at another test, estradiol, to determine whether she is premenopausal and ovulating or menopausal (her estradiol would be very low, and FSH and LH would be high). See the problem? Reference Ranges don't tell you what the doctor is looking for. The same two tests, FSH and LH, are used to diagnose polycystic ovaries (PCO) too.  In women without PCO, the FSH is higher than the LH, but if the LH is greater than the FSH, the diagnosis of PCO should be considered! There is no information about this interpretation in the lab report. Falling within the reference range doesn't guarantee health or absence of symptoms. If patients are to interpret their own lab results, reference ranges should reflect health in every possible scenario. FSH and LH are influenced by BCPs and menopausal HRT. Lab results should be interpreted considering the information regarding BCPs or ERT that the patient is taking. When women are on BCPs and HRT or ERT, their FSH and LH levels are suppressed to an extremely low point. If you are unaware that the patient is taking these hormones, it may appear that the diagnosis is pituitary failure affecting estrogen levels and ovulation. Only doctors can interpret this test. There should truly be a “normal” range for those undergoing hormone replacement therapy, along with a reference range that reflects overall health, rather than merely the average for your geographical area in the US or your age group. Please make an appointment with your doctor to review your lab results so you can understand how they are interpreted. If you have questions about your lab results that are concerning you, schedule a time to discuss them with your doctor. Doctors don't have the time to explain results over the phone or through email—that is what appointments are meant for. Phone calls to doctors' offices are not intended for lab result interpretation. You or your insurance will not compensate the doctor or NP for this service over the phone.   The reference ranges for many tests and medical situations are actually wrong. If you aren't trained as a doctor or Nurse practitioner who interprets metabolic lab results every day, you could get the wrong diagnosis!!! For example, when evaluating a patient for insulin resistance, the reference range was officially changed almost two decades ago. Still, the lab companies have left the normal range very high (insulin> 18). In the revised range, fasting insulin diagnoses insulin resistance if the value is > 10. The resulting outcome is that many people are not diagnosed at a time when they can be easily treated without drugs and are told that they are “normal” when they are really experiencing insulin resistance. This is misleading and just wrong! Lab values are not adjusted to your individual situation.   Many tests are adjusted for gender; however, some are specifically adjusted for women who are menstruating regarding H/H. In other words, men and women have different “normal” H/H levels in the reference range. Women who do not menstruate or who are menopausal should be compared to the same reference range as men, but that does not happen. This leads to menopausal women, who are normal, often being told they have too many red blood cells when that is not the case. Conversely, menopausal women who are truly anemic are told they are normal, which means it takes longer to diagnose their anemia from colon cancer! The H/H should have a reference range that is considered “normal” for a woman's stage in life, depending on whether she is experiencing menstrual periods or not. Many reference ranges are averages for regions of the US and vary between lab companies; therefore, they are not reliable values for comparing patients.   For instance, the Homocysteine test has a normal range that is relatively high, and each lab has different reference ranges. This test serves as a screening tool for MTHFR genetic risk related to embolic stroke and heart disease.   The suggested treatment involves methylated B vitamins; however, the interpretation on the lab printout advises taking B12 and folic acid, which, in my experience, tends to increase the number rather than decrease it. Reference ranges for nutrients, vitamins, and minerals reflect the minimum levels needed for survival, not optimal health. For example, B12 reference range levels for B12 blood levels are listed as 200-1100 pg/ml, yet I was trained to try to achieve 400 -1500 pg/ml. The lower range of the written reference range (200-400) is not healthy. The desired blood levels for vitamins are often controversial, and various medical colleges issue new recommendations on Vitamin D levels each month. Consequently, doctors must determine which level of Vitamin D to recommend for their patients. These institutions not only provide changing reference ranges but also offer differing advice on how frequently to test Vitamin D. This inconsistency arises primarily from the ongoing debate about the minimum acceptable level of Vitamin D. I have more information about your lab results next week that your doctor may not share with you. There is a lot of controversy surrounding the reference ranges on the lab sheet, and you should know the truth in case your doctor doesn't.

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog Last time we reviewed why interpreting your lab may lead you to the wrong diagnosis and treatment.  Today we continue our review of each lab panel and why the reference ranges on your lab results may not be the “Healthy Normal Range” that you should compare your results to. Lab reference ranges are established with a one-size-fits-all mentality, ignoring the numerous variables that influence blood results. Have you ever tried on a “one-size-fits-all “ANYTHING? Those clothes may fit 20% of the population but for the rest of us, the garment doesn't fit our width, weight or height! All one-size-fits-all lab reference ranges are much the same.  For example, the standardized “reference ranges” in the US serve as a one-size-fits-all “ideal range” applied to everyone, despite genetic differences, varying latitudes, and the diverse diets that characterize the American multiethnic population. This presents the first problem with using a single range for all people: variations among individuals based on differing genetic needs.  The second issue is that the ranges on the lab report indicate the minimum levels necessary for survival, not necessarily the healthiest blood levels for most individuals. Another example of one size doesn't fit all is the reference range for women's hormones. A range is displayed for cycling women, but there is no healthy range for menopausal women.  Does the range displayed refer to menopausal women with HRT, or menopausal women without HRT to treat their menopausal symptoms? Is the range based on what is healthy, or what is average? We aren't sure. Labs don't ask patients questions that could help interpret lab values. Therefore, they cannot provide a truly diagnostic reference range for any illness. They only consider gender and age, as reference ranges are solely adjusted for these two factors.  A doctor must interpret individual lab results alongside a patient's medical and surgical history, including established diseases, medications, supplements, hormonal treatments, and past lab values. For instance, laboratory companies should offer reference ranges based on whether a patient is menopausal, a woman is undergoing ERT, a man is receiving testosterone, a patient is on thyroid medication, a person is being treated for diabetes, or the diabetic tests are performed to diagnose diabetes.   Some Reference Ranges are Based on comparing results to Misleading formulas The best example of this issue is the Lipid Panel. Doctors use this panel to determine a person's risk for heart attacks caused by atherosclerosis. Most doctors don't know the formula for determining Total Cholesterol. This test doesn't predict heart disease in most patients, as the formula used to arrive at that number is not indicative of the disease. However, doctors have been advised that when   total cholesterol levels are high, a patient should start taking a statin, a drug that reduces blood cholesterol and sometimes lowers the rate of heart attacks in certain individuals, though it is rarely predictive in 50% of the population. The problem with the lipid panel is twofold: the LDL level indicates future atherosclerosis in only about 50% of the population and is not a specific test for future heart disease risk. Total cholesterol is even less predictive of heart disease because it stems from a flawed formula. Doctors interpret a high Total Cholesterol level as an indication that a patient may be at increased risk for heart disease in the future. When I test patients with elevated Total Cholesterol or high levels of LDL using a Cardiac Calcium Scan to measure plaque, only half of them actually produce plaque, and consequently, are not at risk for atherosclerotic heart disease. I believe that the Total Cholesterol number is derived from an inaccurate formula for determining a person's risk of future heart disease. The Total Cholesterol number is calculated using a flawed equation. The equation is as follows:         LDL + 1/5 Triglycerides+ HDL = Total Cholesterol Total Cholesterol = LDL (bad cholesterol) + 1/5 Triglycerides (high risk factor) + HDL (good cholesterol) Let's examine this formula simply like this:   Bad + Bad + Good does not equal Bad. Due to this incorrect formula, thousands, if not millions, of patients have been prescribed statin drugs for a lifetime without justification!  Statins carry risks. The list of side effects is extensive and includes muscle deterioration and statin-associated dementia. Unfortunately, most people who experience statin side effects are women. Women tend to have higher HDL levels than men. Additionally, they typically do not have atherosclerotic plaque until menopause and usually do not develop it after menopause if they undergo estrogen replacement therapy! This gender issue is just one of the problems with laboratory reference ranges that are not adjusted for sex. The total cholesterol values were developed solely from the blood levels of men, who typically have lower HDL levels. Women were excluded from the tests conducted to create this blood panel. For women, I dispel the myth that high total cholesterol predicts heart disease by recommending a Cardiac Calcium Scan to check for plaque. If a woman has no plaque by the age of 50 and is taking estrogen, she is unlikely to develop plaque in the future.  I still test them every 2-3 years to ensure that no metabolic changes have altered their risk, but I don't put much faith in the unreliable cholesterol blood panel. There is another blood test that has deceptive reference ranges: IGF-1 How about the GH-IGF-1 test, the test for Growth Hormone?  IGF-1 is a metabolite of GH that we can measure to determine how much the patient produces.  This hormone aids in healing and replenishing aging cells in patients after their growth is complete.  The healthy normal range with which I was trained, (150-350 MIU), has been changed to an age-adjusted normal that compares a person to others in her age category who had their blood drawn the previous year.  What is wrong with this? Growth hormone (GH) decreases with age and contributes to the declining health people experience as they grow older. Similarly, IGF-1 diminishes with age and illness, which means that the “reference range” essentially reflects that you are “average for the sick individuals who visit Quest to have their IGF-1 levels checked. ” IGF-1 levels can be enhanced through weight loss, testosterone replacement, and an increase in muscle mass. The current reference range does not indicate health or illness; it merely shows whether you fall within the average for your age group. This non-scientific method of determining “health” is widespread in contemporary medicine. By comparing aging individuals to others within the same age group, for hormones that decline with age, based on samples from sick patients who visit a specific lab in the past year, these labs label patients as “healthy” even when they are as ill as other individuals their age who go to that lab! This practice constitutes age discrimination! Regarding hormones, the levels we maintained during our fertile and youthful years correspond to the blood levels indicative of health in all individuals ages. For example: People who check their IGF-1 (Growth Hormone) levels and see a low “52 ng/ml” might feel satisfied that they are within the standard range (50-280 ng/ml). However, they may not realize that this range applies to older, unhealthy individuals, not to healthy young ones (150-350 ng/ml).  This is just one example of the issues that arise when non-medical individuals, who do not monitor these tests regularly, draw conclusions from the numbers.   Some illnesses require more than one blood test for diagnosis If you consider only one of the three tests for diabetes or prediabetes (Fasting Blood Sugar, HbA1c, and Insulin), you cannot self-diagnose as diabetic, prediabetic, insulin resistance or healthy.  Diabetes is a disease that has coincided with the rising number of obese individuals.  Both conditions affect nearly 50% of the American population. Blood tests cannot be interpreted accurately unless a patient has fasted for 12 hours; all three tests should be evaluated. When diagnosing diabetes and insulin resistance, we perform three tests to assess whether a patient has insulin resistance, prediabetes, or diabetes. These tests guide our diagnosis and inform the treatment we provide based on their results. Fasting insulin is a highly misleading test. Over 15 years ago, a significant study was conducted that was believed to change the reference ranges for fasting insulin.  The new range set for normal fasting insulin was less than 10 mIU/ml. By publishing the reference range less than 18 mIU/ml, they miss diagnosing many patients with insulin resistance HBA1C is a test that gives a value of average blood sugar over three months. The results are often used alone to determine prediabetes and diabetes; however, considering all three aspects makes the diagnosis and treatment plan more specific for the patient. FBS (fasting blood sugar) is the third diabetes test. It is generally used as a screening test that prompts the ordering of the other two blood tests; however, some patients exhibit symptoms of diabetes and insulin resistance without having elevated fasting insulin levels. Many medications can raise diabetic test values, causing a patient to seem diabetic when they are actually experiencing a side effect of the drug.  One such medication is Atorvastatin.  The solution is not treating diabetes but rather adjusting the medication.  Hormone tests are especially challenging to interpret, Especially when testing free Testosterone in women Here are the problems with the free Testosterone test itself: Women have extremely low levels of free testosterone and testosterone compared to men. I have been informed by Quest that women's free testosterone levels are not reliable with current methods because they are not always reproducible when a test is conducted twice on the same day. This leads me to believe that hormone levels do not always reflect the actual blood levels of free testosterone and estradiol. The levels of testosterone in women are based on menopausal levels of T. Women have long been thought to not produce testosterone, so the “normal” levels are quite low, and 0 used to be considered normal- until one day I managed to persuade a medical director at Quest to increase it to 0.2! Women's testosterone is influenced by their production of E2 and E1, which inactivate free T. Women vary in how their cells respond to testosterone and estradiol. Receptor sites and their genetic acceptance of hormones can mean that the same blood level of testosterone in both sexes does not produce the same effects in all patients. Some women (and men) are resistant to E2 and T, or to one of the two. This indicates that the hormone-free T level may be optimal for one woman while being ineffective in alleviating any low T symptoms for another. The latter individual is T resistant, and we currently have no means outside of research labs to determine which women are sensitive and which are resistant. This requires that doctors and NPs look beyond typical reference ranges to effectively manage E2 and T replacement for women. Lastly some labs use the total testosterone level through a formula determine the free T. This carries inherent risks of reporting the wrong active level of testosterone. Total and free testosterone blood levels for men, are derived from results of older men, rather than from the blood levels that indicate health and the levels at which men experience no symptoms. This leads men to believe they are normal, even though they are symptomatic, and they can't get treatment. There is no time to discuss the reference ranges for LH, FSH, Estradiol, and Estrone; these topics will be addressed in a future blog. I hope I have encouraged you to review your blood work with your doctor or Nurse Practitioner, and not to act as your own doctor by interpreting your blood tests.

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog Menopausal Symptoms I waited to announce the emerging research regarding the safety of post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy for breast cancer patients suffering from severe menopausal symptoms until the research finally supported my belief that women have the right to receive the treatment that they need if they accept the risks of that treatment. The past year of research (2024-2025) has produced a significant amount of research demonstrating the health risks associated from not taking hormone replacement therapy, as well as the safety of using testosterone after breast cancer and the limited risks of hormone replacement therapy following breast cancer. I have practiced women's medicine for over 40 years, and I believe that female patients should have the right to receive post-menopausal hormone therapy if they understand and accept the associated risks and benefits, as long as it is administered safely. Let me pause here to discuss how doctors ethically make decisions about treatment. First, the aim of medical treatment is to improve health and longevity while alleviating symptoms. It is a doctor's responsibility to evaluate, treat, and advise patients on the best course of therapy based on their medical training, practical experience, and the latest research. However, the third factor is often overlooked when advising patients about hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer. Doctors determine the best course of treatment by using this information and weighing the benefits of a treatment against its risks. We are trained to provide this information to patients to facilitate informed decision-making with the patient, not for the patient. This process requires time that doctors no longer have. Ah, and therein lies the problem. Doctors are trained to follow research related to the diseases and conditions they treat and to integrate that research into their practice. The basic decision-making process involves weighing the benefits of treatment (or no treatment) against the associated risks. When the benefits of a treatment outweigh its risks, it is recommended to the patient. “Recommended” means the doctor, based on current knowledge, believes it to be safer and more effective for the patient's health to pursue a specific treatment. However, this does not imply that the patient must follow the doctor's advice. A patient is autonomous and can assess the risks and benefits once informed, allowing them to refuse a treatment or request one that falls outside current medical guidelines. Doctors do not have to embark on a treatment they do not believe is beneficial or safe. Doctors have autonomy as well! Doctors in mainstream medicine adhere to “medical guidelines” established by our specialties, which represent the minimum level of care expected from a physician. However, these guidelines are often decades behind current research, meaning that the risks and benefits communicated to a patient may be outdated. A legal requirement known as informed consent mandates that a doctor inform the patient or include this information in a consent form that the patient reads and signs, detailing the procedure or treatment. If the treatment is newer than the guidelines, it is categorized as “off-label.” It is essential for the doctor to inform the patient that the treatment does not conform to current guidelines, and the patient must acknowledge the known risks associated with the treatment. At BioBalance Health®, we often find ourselves ahead of the guidelines, and my experience indicates it may take up to 20 years for the guidelines to catch up with us. Much of our treatment is considered off-label because it is current and ahead of the guidelines. It is superior to other treatments and remains safe, but risks are inherent in every treatment! Now, let's return to breast cancer and the roles of estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone replacement. Here are the facts about breast cancer: Most breast cancer patients are post-menopausal, and have symptoms of menopause Not all types of breast cancer are stimulated by estradiol or progesterone, and therefore for these cancers hormone replacement therapy is safe. Breast Cancer patients with negative nodes who have had a bilateral mastectomy are candidates for hormone replacement therapy after their treatment. The risks of estrogen replacement for ER+ breast cancer patients may promote the growth of cancer cells, while testosterone replacement lowers the risk of recurrence and alleviates certain menopausal symptoms. When testosterone is combined with estradiol, the risk of developing breast cancer in all women is reduced. Testosterone enhances the quantity and activity of cancer-fighting T-killer and T-helper white blood cells. All breast cancer patients can manage menopause symptoms using testosterone pellet therapy and vaginal estrogen without an increased risk of recurrence. Do you remember when I mentioned that the risks of treatment should be balanced with the benefits of that same treatment? Recently, numerous research articles have outlined the benefits of estradiol treatment, which I included in my 2017 book, “The Secret Female Hormone: How Testosterone Replacement Can Change Your Life.” In early 2025, the safety of taking estradiol for menopausal women confirmed the less publicized research that had come before. The Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism reported that women who underwent estradiol replacement after the age of 60 live 20% longer than those who do not take hormone replacement therapy. This challenges the guideline that advises OB-GYNs to discontinue hormone replacement therapy before the age of 60. The Benefits of Estrogen replacement after menopause, based on multiple research studies over the last 20 years is as follows: ERT alleviates symptoms such as dry vagina, painful intercourse, insomnia, hot flashes, and night sweats. Estrogen replacement prevents and treats osteoporosis in women. Testosterone replacement in women with osteoporosis can reverse the process of bone loss, bringing bone back to normal strength and decreasing fracture risk. Non-oral Testosterone and Estradiol can prevent arteriosclerotic heart disease. ERT and HRT decreases the risk of diabetes with aging. Estradiol replacement during the first decade after menopause can delay the onset of Alzheimer's disease and dementia by ten years. If you are genetically predisposed to developing Alzheimer's or dementia by age 80, E2 replacement may postpone this onset until you turn 90. Testosterone replacement in the first 10 years after menopause postpones the onset of Alzheimer's disease and dementia for an additional ten years. Testosterone boosts immune function in both sexes and diminishes the onset and severity of infectious diseases. Aging causes cognitive decline, marked by challenges in memory and thinking, and menopause speeds up this process. Testosterone and estradiol replacement therapies may aid in reversing this decline. Muscle mass decreases after menopause due to a decline in testosterone but replacing testosterone with bio-identical pellets restores muscle mass to premenopausal levels.   The latest medical article that inspired me to create this podcast was published in the journal Menopause, which discussed the challenges many women face after breast cancer treatment without hormone replacement for their severe menopausal symptoms. Here are the quotes I think you should hear: (MHT = Menopause Hormone Therapy) “Among 226 breast cancer survivors.. the menopause symptom burden was high and women's experience of menopause-related breast cancer after-care was poor. Few women felt actively involved in menopause treatment decisions.  The NICE breast cancer guideline (NG101) states that women with a history of breast cancer can be offered MHT in “exceptional” circumstances if other treatments have failed (off-label use). However, NICE does not define what “exceptional” circumstances are or who gets to decide. Up to 50% of breast cancer survivors, especially those with debilitating menopausal symptoms, may choose to accept a small increase in risk in exchange for an improved quality of life and/or to mitigate future health risks associated with chronic estrogen deficiency.  “Allowing”. women to have MHT only in “exceptional” circumstance undermines patient autonomy and limits a clinician's ability to integrate clinical knowledge and judgment with the best currently available evidence (which is decades behind clinical guidelines). Clinicians have a legal and ethical responsibility to patients to make informed treatment choices. If you have had breast cancer and are experiencing symptoms you no longer want to endure, my advice is to find a doctor with whom you can make an informed decision based on the latest research. It's important to understand and accept the risks and to sign a High-Risk Consent for HRT.  If you aren't that brave, then seek a physician who will prescribe testosterone pellets along with vaginal estradiol to alleviate some of your post-menopausal symptoms. Life is too short to follow guidelines that are 20 years out of date when you are suffering.

For over four years, Turkey was unable to get the Biden administration to lift CAATSA sanctions. Now, as we are seeing in various reports, this issue is back on the table following a call between President Trump and President Erdogan last week. Aside from the lifting of sanctions, the biggest prize Erdogan reportedly was after in his call with Trump was the sale of F-35 fighter jets. This comes despite the fact that Turkey's purchase of Russian S-400 missiles remains an unresolved issue. Lena Argiri, the DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis with the latest scoop from Washington, DC.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Potential upcoming developments regarding the lifting of CAATSAWill Trump betray MAGA for Turkey's Erdoğan?Fierce protests in Turkey after Erdogan rival jailedGreece's ‘nouvelle vague' sinks the Scots in GlasgowScotland relegated in Nations League as Karetsas leads Greece demolition job

Savant Syndrome er heilkennið sem lætur þig verða Erró (eða Perró) á einni nóttu, kunna alla stærðfræðina sem þú hefur strögglað við alla þína ævi eða verða Mozart bara við það eitt að heyra tónlist. Ert þú kannski með Savant Syndrome? https://www.instagram.com/jaelskan/

Greece's two-year term as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council began at the outset of 2025. Since then, Greece has been at the heart of key discussions and initiatives - from playing a role in renewing the mandate of the UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus to the Security Council adopting its resolution on maritime security in the Red Sea. Lena Argiri, the DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis as we break down Greece's priorities on the Security Council, and explain what this means for the country's global diplomatic standing.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Greece begins two-year term at UN Security CouncilUN Security Council adopts Red Sea resolution drafted by Greece, USCyprus and Chevron-led group agree on updated plan for offshore fieldCyprus and Egypt to sign natural gas commercialization agreementsGreek military eyes technological leap

About Mark Gee:Mark Gee is the Chief Growth Officer at Medecision, driving the expansion of Aerial™, a cloud-based healthcare solution that improves health outcomes, reduces costs, and enhances engagement for value-based care organizations. With extensive experience in healthcare leadership, including roles at WellSky, Ciox/Datavant, and ERT, Gee has launched innovative care solutions and spearheaded data-driven strategies to optimize operations. Holding an M.S. in Instructional Design and Lean Systems Management, he excels in disruptive innovation and strategic growth, positioning Medecision as a leader in transforming healthcare delivery and operational efficiencies.Things You'll Learn:Medecision's platform, Ariel, is designed to accept any data format and process it in real time, a crucial factor for unlocking potential use cases and overcoming the limitations of rigid systems. Traditional care management is failing because it focuses on the sickest 20% of patients, overlooking rising-risk individuals. Medecision's core goal is to deliver proactive care and act as a safety net for patients by identifying problems earlier. Many healthcare organizations have rigid data schemas that slow down implementations and limit the use of valuable data. Medecision created hyper-personalized care journeys with micro cohorts that adapt and learn from each individual's conditions. This approach allows the system to surface needs and provide appropriate resources in real time.Resources:Connect with and follow Mark Gee on LinkedIn.Follow Medecision on LinkedIn and visit their website.

Welcome to "The Collective," where we embark on the journey of daily betterment and living our best lives. Join our diverse panel discussions with individuals from various backgrounds, all striving for personal growth. In this episode, we're honored to host Travis Bader, a firearms instructor, hunter, and outdoorsman; and Seb Lavoie, a former RCMP Sgt Maj, ERT operator, and team leader now security consultant, speaker, and combatives instructor; a former Green Beret now security consultant and podcaster. Together, they share invaluable lessons on "Aggression." This engaging conversation examines the role of aggression in achieving goals, overcoming obstacles, and responding to high-pressure situations. The guests discuss the fine line between assertion, which drives focused action and determination, and aggression, which can lead to impulsive decisions and conflict. Drawing from their diverse experiences in tactical, professional, and personal arenas, they share how to harness aggression as a tool for growth and performance. The discussion also explores the importance of emotional regulation, situational awareness, and the ability to channel aggression in a controlled and purposeful manner. The guests highlight how aggression, when properly understood and managed, can be a critical element in leadership, competition, and survival scenarios. With weekly 2-hour releases, "The Collective" offers casual yet profound discussions, drawing from personal experiences to inspire collective wisdom. Tune in and join our community dedicated to positivity, growth, and informed dialogue. #TheCollective #PersonalGrowth #Creativity #Podcast

In a move heralded as historic, President Joe Biden issued a presidential determination this week officially including Cyprus in three critical US defense programs. Cyprus hailed the decision allowing military sales, including arms, to the island as a milestone affirming the country's role as a pillar of stability in the Eastern Mediterranean. Lena Argiri, the DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis to look at this major development in US-Cyprus ties that paves the way for the incoming Trump administration to take this relationship to new heights.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Cyprus included in three critical US defense programsGreece has tapped 18 bln euros from EU's Recovery FundPM marks shift, nominates House speaker as next president

Derzeit übertreffen sich der designierte US-Präsident Trump und deutsche Oppositionspolitiker gegenseitig mit Forderungen, die Rüstungsausgaben zu erhöhen. Grünen-Kandidat Habeck 3,5 Prozent und der AfD-Kandidatin Weidel sind selbst Trumps 5 Prozent zu gering – mehr als dies sei „sehr wahrscheinlich“ nötig, wenn man es, so Weidel, „ernst nehme mit der Ertüchtigung der Bundeswehr undWeiterlesen

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/literary-studies

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/russian-studies

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/eastern-european-studies

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans.

Immer noch Dezember. Die Weihnachtszeit hat offiziell begonnen, doch – wie könnte es anders sein – wir bleiben unserer Linie treu: der körperlichen Ertüchtigung. Toni Kroos – offiziell Rentner des Profisports [Anm. d. Red.] – berichtet uns, wie er seine Freizeit "sportlich gestaltet". Schon beim Zuhören spüren wir ein leichtes Ziehen im Trizeps nahen und um es mit Felix' Worten zu sagen: "Nee, lass mal." Felix wiederum – seines Zeichens Rennfahrer in Zivil [Anm. d. Red.] – hat aktuell ohnehin keinen Kopf für sportliche Betätigung. Zwischen Weihnachtsfeiern, Preisverleihungen und mysteriösen privaten Verpflichtungen bleibt dafür schlicht keine Zeit. Und so kommt es, dass Felix am Wochenende beeindruckende 22 Stunden auf der Autobahn verbringt und von einem Termin zum nächsten hetzt, während Toni sich in Felix' Heimat Berlin bei Ein Herz für Kinder ins Callcenter setzt und höchstpersönlich den Hörer schwingt. Auf dem roten Sofa lümmelnd, ergibt sich dann noch ein Pläuschen mit dem Vorsitzenden des ersten deutschen Spitzenschwitzvereins – nicht aber ohne morgens in Madrid noch ein paar Kilometerchen gelaufen zu sein. Natürlich, wie sollte es auch anders sein. Doch was findet der angehende Rennfahrer Felix da in seinem Briefkasten? Ein Schreiben der Polizeidirektion Berlin? Das können ja nur Weihnachtsgrüße sein. Öffnen wir den Brief doch gemeinsam und schauen mal rein. Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? [**Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte!**](https://linktr.ee/luppentv)

Heute gibt's ein Diskussionsduett, denn der gute Mats kann leider nicht dabei sein. Also nehmen Jonas und Luki den Stier zu zweit auf die Hörner und treffen sich auf eine Partie „Ochs am Berg“ zum Soundtrack von „Narcotic“ (Liquido). Dabei plaudern sie standesgemäß über alles, was sie in Sachen körperlicher Ertüchtigung (im weitesten Sinne) gerade für relevant halten: die gemeinsamen Videos von Mr. Beast und Cristiano Ronaldo zum Beispiel. Oder über Lewis Hamilton, einen langjährigen Freund der Sendung, und seine absurden Rekorde. Außerdem wird die alles entscheidende Frage aufgeworfen: Wer bewegt sich denn nun eigentlich besser auf dem Tennisplatz – Juan Martin del Potro oder Jonas? So oder so haben beide natürlich eines gemeinsam: Man kann sie beide nicht NICHT mögen, genau wie die Maskottchen in der Hall of Fame für Maskottchen. Aber was bedeutet das alles jetzt für unsere Haltung gegenüber Novak Djokovic? Wissen wir auch nicht. Aber wir garantieren: In dieser Folge steht kein sprachliches Bild länger als eine halbe Sekunde!

Nach meinem Eindruck äußern sich heute viele Zeitgenossen, Journalisten, Politiker, Bürgerinnen und Bürger über Krieg, über die Möglichkeit zum Krieg und die „Ertüchtigung“ zum Krieg – ohne dass erkennbar würde, dass sie wissen und sich vorstellen können, was Krieg bedeutet, welches Elend Krieg auslöst. „Kriegstüchtig werden“, „Russland ruinieren“ – wenn ich diese Worte höre, dannWeiterlesen

The launch of a strategic dialogue between Cyprus and the US last month was quickly followed up by another historic development: President Christodoulides' visit to the White House. With US-Cyprus ties deepening at a rapid pace, this was a chance for Christodoulides to present his strategic vision for Cyprus, including, as reports indicate, the potential future integration of Cyprus into NATO. Lena Argiri, the Washington, DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis to discuss this plan to institutionalize Cyprus' relationship with NATO, a potentially transformative opportunity for both Cyprus and the whole region.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Nicosia keeping its eye on NATO prizeEU prolongs Turkey oil-related sanctions2025 budget to support incomes against inflation, PM says

Tonight, The Light Gate welcomes author, researcher and experiencer Kathleen Marden to the show! Kathleen Marden's insatiable interest in UFOs and ET contact began in 1961, when her aunt and uncle Betty and Barney Hill had a close encounter and UFO abduction in New Hampshire's White Mountains. As a family member, Kathleen gained firsthand knowledge of Betty's and Barney's UFO encounter on the day they arrived home and two days later she, her parents, and siblings visited the Hill's home. She has devoted years to painstaking investigation of the Hills' anomalous events and archival research on their UFO abduction case. As the trustee of Betty's estate, she selected files from Betty's personal archival collection for a permanent collection at the Milne Special Collections Library, UNH Library, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH. You will find her case study of the evidence in her book with Stanton Friedman, “Captured! The Betty and Barney Hill UFO Experience” (Updated in 2021). Since 1991 she has volunteered for the Mutual UFO Network in various positions such as Director of Field Investigator Training and Founder/Director of MUFON's Experiencer Resource Team. Over a ten-year period, Kathleen expanded her ERT team from three members to forty-five trained, seasoned specialists and attracted PhD and MD psychological and research consultants. Additionally, she sat on the Edgar Mitchell Free Advisory Board. In this period, she worked on three studies on nearly 5,000 experiencers (Marden-Stoner, Edgar Mitchell FREE, MUFON ERT). She is presently working on the “Marden-Barton Survey of Religious Belief and Extraterrestrial Life,” which is available on her website. She has appeared as an on-camera commentator on fifty-five television and video productions. Additionally, she has spoken on innumerable radio shows and podcasts and has lectured across the United States and to audiences in foreign countries. She has authored and coauthored numerous books and articles in UFO magazines and journals. Two of her books are available in foreign languages. She is the recipient of two major awards (MUFON and the International UFO Congress), for her years of dedicated work. Her books also include, The Alien Abduction Files, Forbidden Knowledge, Extraterrestrial Contact, Science Was Wrong, Fact, Fiction and Flying Saucers, True Stories of Alien Abduction, Making Contact and more. Some of her co-writers include Denise Stoner and Stanton Friedman.

In this episode, Jackie Meyer sits down with Anton Anderson to discuss the essentials of strategic partnerships between financial advisors and accountants. Anton shares his expertise on creating a virtual family office, establishing valuable advisor-CPA relationships, and the importance of proactive client support. Together, they cover practical steps for finding the right partners, avoiding common pitfalls, and exploring industry initiatives designed to strengthen collaboration and client value.2:01 How did you get into financial planning and wealth management?4:08 How would you define a virtual family office?6:02 What do you think about the relationship between accountants and financial advisors?9:03 How can advisors prove themselves as quality partners to CPAs?11:52 Can you explain the initiative we've been working on together?17:31 Why do you think strategic partnerships are important?20:01 How can accountants become more proactive for clients?22:22 Do you have any upcoming initiatives you can share?30:30 What are red flags when building partnerships?

This week Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulidis will head to Washington, DC for an official meeting with President Joe Biden at the Oval Office. The invitation - which was reported on this weekend - comes as US-Cyprus relations continue to reach new heights. These past few months alone have put this positive trajectory in the spotlight, with Cyprus and the US signing a defense cooperation agreement and initiating a strategic dialogue. Lena Argiri, the Washington, DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis to look at what this White House visit means for US-Cyprus ties, especially as Cyprus emerges as a critical strategic partner for the United States.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Cypriot President Christodoulides to meet with Biden at the White HouseGreek president, PM attend October 28th commemoration eventsMitsotakis highlights importance of national unity ahead of ‘Ochi Day'North Macedonia seeking closer cooperation

ACE's Preservation Conference marked the end of an amazing summer of conferences, regional events and informal meetups. We round out the summer with a mega episode that recaps 2024's final national ACE event. Join us as correspondents/producers Derek and Doug Perry and co-host Jessica Gardner introduce our new correspondent Gerik Gooch to walk through this awesome weekend.   The Bertch family, owners of Lost Island Theme Park, surprised ACE by making a new coaster announcement during dinner! We can't wait to see how Firerunner enhances an already-exciting park. In this Episode:   [1:50] Meet new ACE Ride with Us correspondent Gerik Gooch! [8:50] Gerik is part of the Blusiasts (Black Enthusiasts) group [11:10] Preservation Con (aka Corn Con) introduces Lost Island Theme Park [30:35] Moving on to Adventureland for day 2, Doug Perry introduces the ride highlights [38:42] Adventureland's Tornado became an ACE Roller Coaster Landmark [40:57] Alex Payne, former Regional Public Relations Manager at Palace Entertainment, talks about the history of Adventureland [1:01:00] Day 3, Worlds of Fun!  Derek Perry shares some history of the park, the group walks through ERT and ride highlights   Check out the Preservation Conference videos on ACE's YouTube channel! Day 1: Lost Island Day 2: Adventureland Day 3: Worlds of Fun ACE Roller Coaster Landmark: Tornado   Learn more about the Blusiast in their Facebook group or on Instagram.   Share your ideas and thoughts about this podcast via email: podcast@aceonline.org. Did you know anyone can join ACE? Visit ridewithace.com to learn more about the non-profit organization American Coaster Enthusiasts.   Podcast Team  Host: Jessica Gardner Producers and Correspondents: Derek Perry and Doug Perry Editor and Correspondent: Bob Randolph Show Notes: Liz Tan Production Manager: Corey Wooten Correspondents: John Davidson and Gerik Gooch

UFO Researcher Shares Hidden Truths! | Kathleen MardenToday we're talking with Kathleen Marden#ufo #uap #aliensThis video is sponsored by Birch Boys www.BirchBoys.com *Use Code NEWEARTH for 20% off your entire order. Birch Boys features two of my favorite products: ChagaNOW for immune support and Lions Mane Tincture for an amazing improvement in clarity and brain function.  

Fanney Sigurðardóttir, miðlari, í einu orði. Við spjöllum um innsæið, hvernig við tengjumst því, styrkjum það og getum notað það dags daglega og lærum að treysta innæinu. Hvað er skylirðislaus ást? Er hún til? Takk kærlega fyrir að hlusta.Ert þú með umræðuefni eða spurningu sem þú vilt að sé tekið fyrir?Sendu okkur línu!Þú getur fylgst með okkur inn á IG: losti.is Verslun okkar er staðsett í Borgartúni 3Og netverslunin er ALLTAF opin.Njótið!Sendu okkur línu!

This weekend Kathimerini reported that a US proposal is on the table that could see a resolution to the Russian S-400 missile issue that has been a thorn in the side of US-Turkey relations over the last years. This could potentially result in the lifting of CAATSA sanctions and a path for Turkey to rejoin the F35 program. Lena Argiri, the Washington, DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis with the latest scoop from Washington, DC.Read Lena Argiri's latest piece for Kathimerini: Talks on S-400 seen nearing a compromiseYou can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:HALC makes ‘no weapons to Turkey' petition to US CongressBusy week of meetings for PM at the UN

We hear this all the time… “be authentic when you show up online”.  While this is great, the marketing world doesn't often look at it from a different lens. The lens of mindset.  This episode of The Content Queen Podcast shares what authenticity looks like from a deeper level and how you can check in to make sure you are energetic about showing up online because you do feel authentic.  If you LOVED this episode, make sure you share this on your Instagram stories and tag us @contentqueenmariah and @livingwholistically  ⁠✨⁠⁠⁠Want to learn our signature framework to help with content strategy? Take our FREE workshop⁠⁠⁠✨⁠ ⁠ KEY EPISODE TAKEAWAYS

Ert þú alltaf að hlusta á gamla tónlist? Eru kvikmyndirnar sem þú ert að horfa á bara sömu kvikmyndir aftur og aftur? Hér er sagan rakin frá afdrifaríkum hryðjuverkaárásum árið 2001 og fjallað um hvernig menning okkar mótaðist í kringum 2005 og hefur síðan lítið breyst. Algrímin valda því, að mati sérfræðinga, að allt sem við sjáum og heyrum er endurtekning eða endurvinnsla þess sem áður hefur virkað.  Annað: Trump vs. Harris kappræður Munurinn á kapítalisma og kommúnisma 9/11 og áhrifin á alheimssamfélagið Nýr iPhone og regluverksfargan Evrópusambandsins Skaðleg sálfræðiþjónusta fyrir ungt fólk með þunglyndi og kvíða Kostir áfengis

Since Worlds of Fun opened in 1973, it has delighted visitors to the Kansas City, MO location ever since. It's home to many historic rides and has a rich history. ACE members had a chance to visit the park during the 2024 Preservation Conference, enjoying behind-the-scenes experiences, great catered meals, ERT and some thorough presentations.    During the conference, Unofficial Worlds of Fun Historian Jennifer Lovesee-Mast shared a delightful presentation that highlighted the park's history. Join us for a replay of this presentation plus a Q&A with the ACE members in the audience.   In this Episode: [06:40] Unofficial Worlds of Fun Historian and worldsoffun.org founder Jennifer Lovesee-Mast shares the park's history [11:10] Shoutout to the original Von Roll skyride from the park's opening days [12:00] Moving the steamboat Cotton Blossom from California to Kansas City!  [19:00] Adding and subtracting rides over the years [41:40] Questions and answers about the park    Learn more about Worlds of Fun Visit worldsoffun.org to learn more about the park's history or visit their Facebook page.   Share your ideas and thoughts about this podcast via email: podcast@aceonline.org. Did you know anyone can join ACE? Visit ridewithace.com to learn more about the non-profit organization American Coaster Enthusiasts.   Podcast Team  Host: Jessica Gardner Producers and Correspondents: Derek Perry and Doug Perry Editor and Correspondent: Bob Randolph Show Notes: Liz Tan Production Manager: Corey Wooten Correspondent: John Davidson  

Are you experiencing niggling symptoms or major conditions that you feel you've tried everything to overcome? Perhaps you've changed your diet, made lifestyle changes, taken the supplements and nothing is shifting? It might be worth considering your emotional health and how this is impacting both your nervous system and potentially manifesting into your physical health challenges. To explore how, today we're delving into the world of 'Emotion Release Technique' (ERT) with Bek Di Mauro. Bek is a qualified Clinical Nutritionist, Metabolic Balance practitioner, Emotion Release Technique Practitioner, Yoga Teacher & Personal trainer. Bek uses ERT to support her own clients along their health journey, partners with other health practitioners to help their clients overcome barriers to treatment progress and anyone that feels like an underlying emotion or stress pattern is affecting their behaviour or health negatively. PODCAST SHOWNOTES & MORE FROM BEK: https://www.glowingmumma.com/blog/episode115 CYCLE & HORMONE TRACKING DEVICE (I use for natural contraception): http://www.tempdrop.com/discount/AFGLOWINGMUMMA  SAY HI ON INSTA: https://www.instagram.com/backtothepaddock/       

本期我们迎来了一位新朋友，也是大内第一位跨性别嘉宾——三宝。当然，三宝不是一个人来的，作为她的好友兼邻居，张无梦博士也来到了现场。除此之外，划水怪和大猛也加入了这场讨论。本期，我们无意窥探隐私或者刻意猎奇，只是想讲述一位独立个体的跨性别经历。三宝先锋的性别观点、勇于做自己的勇气也给三位顺直男带来了不小的震撼。在听完这期节目后，也欢迎大家在评论区友好讨论。更多精彩内容，欢迎收听本期节目。主播 / 相征 嘉宾 / 三宝 大猛 张无梦 音频后期 / 陆凯BBBBUDDHA音频上传 / Observer - 本节目由深夜谈谈 Midnight Network出品 -Playlist:01:57:06 Antony and the Johnsons - Hope There's SomeoneTimeline:00:06:58 三宝还是男孩时最大的困扰00:11:34 漫画小说等作品可以影响人的性别偏好吗？00:13:27 学校里被规训的男女差异00:18:39 什么是四爱？00:26:33 第一次去变装俱乐部和SM酒吧00:31:58 父母发现三宝成为跨性别者时的反应00:39:00 ERT激素替代治疗法00:45:43 使用激素治疗后身体出现的反应00:56:24 跨性别标签放大了某些社会矛盾01:05:25 一种新的儒家女性主义01:11:37 三宝的性别意识是如何被建立的？01:17:39 人在灵魂层面是没有性别差异的01:37:56 三宝关于一些女性主义问题的看法01:46:44 未来该如何谋生？ 9月14日至9月18日，由Miya带队的恋爱团「恋战冲绳」正式开始报名啦！！五天四夜，四男四女，恋综级别的行程安排。快来加入恋爱旅行团，Miya带你穿梭于冲绳的碧海蓝天之间，感受那片未被打扰的宁静与浪漫！报名详情请在大内夜市小程序搜多「冲绳恋爱团」查看！加入我们：深夜谈谈招聘CEO助理、内容运营！搜索公众号「大内密谈」查看职位描述和任职要求。请将求职信+简历+个人作品发送至邮箱jobs@midnightalks.com，并注明应聘岗位及意向城市。-深夜谈谈播客网络旗下播客：大内密谈、枕边风、空岛、随便聪明、淮海333-你还可以在这里找到我们：小红书：@深夜谈谈子、@相征terryB站：@大内密谈midnightalks视频号&抖音：@深夜谈谈子微博：@大内密谈 微信公众号：大内密谈商务合作邮箱：biz@midnightalks.com加听众群：加深夜谈谈子微信（微信号: aidanei17301214531）并回复【听众群】即可进群。

Recently, American Gospel publicly released the latest roundtable featured in correlation with the upcoming docuseries, American Gospel: Spirit and Fire. This roundtable discussed the question of the NAR-New Apostolic Reformation and if it is a movement or a myth. Join me as I begin a three-part series discussing main points noted in this roundtable, and we consider further information to answer this important question. Resources: American Gospel NAR Roundtable: https://youtu.be/SSrPARqidAM?si=Q5UxVfUC7M_Aobvb This is dedicated to the NAR denier: https://youtu.be/iLfxFct8EJA?si=TQmuAzeHA1aYbWr2 Mike Winger and The Passion Translation: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ3iRMLYFlHvXha4rjCj1Po0WLQc_jGGW&si=Dd-7W1gVf-V06UCa Richard Moore's YT channel: https://theology.worldea.org/.../2023/05/ERT-47-2_web.pdf www.youtube.com/@richardm23 My info: Website: http://www.lovesickscribe.com Subscribe to my blog here: http://eepurl.com/dfZ-uH Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lovesickscribe/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lovesickscribeblog If you found this video helpful, please share it with others and leave a good review. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dawn-hill2/support

June 7th, 2024 USA v. Miles Guo Audio TranscriptThe government's 12th witness, Margaret Murphy, FBI's Assistant Team Leader for ERT. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In a shocking turn of events, there was an attempted assassination on former President Donald J. Trump. If you haven't seen the headlines, you might be off the grid! This news has spread worldwide, reminiscent of major events in history.In this video, I sit down with my good friend, Tom Myers, a retired FBI ERT supervisor, to discuss the incident and the investigation's progress. We delve into the following:The Incident: A 20-year-old from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, managed to fire several rounds at President Trump from 130 yards away.Investigation Insights: We discuss how the investigation is moving forward, the role of the ERT from Quantico, and the involvement of numerous federal agents in Butler, Pennsylvania.Communication Breakdown: Speculations on the possible communication failures among the Secret Service, state police, and local agencies.Background Checks: We talk about the suspected shooter's history and mental state, as well as the role of inflammatory rhetoric in inciting such actions.Federal vs. State Jurisdiction: Clarification on the dual investigations being conducted by the FBI and Pennsylvania State Police.Forensic Analysis: Insights into the meticulous forensic process that will uncover the truth and dispel conspiracy theories.Real-World Expertise: Tom shares his extensive experience in police work, presidential security, and major crime scene investigations.Join us as we unpack the layers of this unprecedented event and explore the complexities of the ongoing investigation.Timestamps:0:00 - Introduction1:30 - Overview of the Assassination Attempt5:00 - Introducing Tom Myers, Retired FBI ERT Supervisor8:15 - Speculations on Communication Failures15:30 - Shooter's Background and Mental State22:45 - Federal and State Investigation Jurisdictions30:10 - Detailed Forensic Processes40:00 - Real-World Expertise and Case ComparisonsFollow us for more in-depth analyses and updates on this case:

THE LIGHT GATE – Kathleen Marden – UFOs, Spiritual Transformation, Onboard UFO Encounters The Light Gate welcomes guest: Kathleen Marden, author, researcher, experiencer Date: June 24, 2024 Episode: 061 Discussion: UFOs, extraterrestrial contact, spiritual transformation, UFO coverup Tonight, The Light Gate is very happy to welcome back author, researcher and experiencer Kathleen Marden to the show! Kathleen Marden's insatiable interest in UFOs and ET contact began in 1961, when her aunt and uncle Betty and Barney Hill had a close encounter and UFO abduction in New Hampshire's White Mountains. As a family member, Kathleen gained firsthand knowledge of Betty's and Barney's UFO encounter on the day they arrived home and two days later she, her parents, and siblings visited the Hill's home. She has devoted years to painstaking investigation of the Hills' anomalous events and archival research on their UFO abduction case. As the trustee of Betty's estate, she selected files from Betty's personal archival collection for a permanent collection at the Milne Special Collections Library, UNH Library, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH. You will find her case study of the evidence in her book with Stanton Friedman, “Captured! The Betty and Barney Hill UFO Experience” (Updated in 2021). Since 1991 she has volunteered for the Mutual UFO Network in various positions such as Director of Field Investigator Training and Founder/Director of MUFON's Experiencer Resource Team. Over a ten-year period, Kathleen expanded her ERT team from three members to forty-five trained, seasoned specialists and attracted PhD and MD psychological and research consultants. Additionally, she sat on the Edgar Mitchell Free Advisory Board. In this period, she worked on three studies on nearly 5,000 experiencers (Marden-Stoner, Edgar Mitchell FREE, MUFON ERT). She is presently working on the “Marden-Barton Survey of Religious Belief and Extraterrestrial Life,” which is available on her website. She has appeared as an on-camera commentator on fifty-five television and video productions. Additionally, she has spoken on innumerable radio shows and podcasts and has lectured across the United States and to audiences in foreign countries. She has authored and coauthored numerous books and articles in UFO magazines and journals. Two of her books are available in foreign languages. She is the recipient of two major awards (MUFON and the International UFO Congress), for her years of dedicated work. Her books also include, The Alien Abduction Files, Forbidden Knowledge, Extraterrestrial Contact, Science Was Wrong, Fact, Fiction and Flying Saucers, True Stories of Alien Abduction, Making Contact and more. Some of her co-writers include Denise Stoner and Stanton Friedman. LINKS: www.kathleen-marden.com https://www.facebook.com/kathleen.marden https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3472496/

THE LIGHT GATE – Kathleen Marden – UFOs, Spiritual Transformation, Onboard UFO Encounters The Light Gate welcomes guest: Kathleen Marden, author, researcher, experiencer Date: June 24, 2024 Episode: 061 Discussion: UFOs, extraterrestrial contact, spiritual transformation, UFO coverup Tonight, The Light Gate is very happy to welcome back author, researcher and experiencer Kathleen Marden to the show! Kathleen Marden's insatiable interest in UFOs and ET contact began in 1961, when her aunt and uncle Betty and Barney Hill had a close encounter and UFO abduction in New Hampshire's White Mountains. As a family member, Kathleen gained firsthand knowledge of Betty's and Barney's UFO encounter on the day they arrived home and two days later she, her parents, and siblings visited the Hill's home. She has devoted years to painstaking investigation of the Hills' anomalous events and archival research on their UFO abduction case. As the trustee of Betty's estate, she selected files from Betty's personal archival collection for a permanent collection at the Milne Special Collections Library, UNH Library, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH. You will find her case study of the evidence in her book with Stanton Friedman, “Captured! The Betty and Barney Hill UFO Experience” (Updated in 2021). Since 1991 she has volunteered for the Mutual UFO Network in various positions such as Director of Field Investigator Training and Founder/Director of MUFON's Experiencer Resource Team. Over a ten-year period, Kathleen expanded her ERT team from three members to forty-five trained, seasoned specialists and attracted PhD and MD psychological and research consultants. Additionally, she sat on the Edgar Mitchell Free Advisory Board. In this period, she worked on three studies on nearly 5,000 experiencers (Marden-Stoner, Edgar Mitchell FREE, MUFON ERT). She is presently working on the “Marden-Barton Survey of Religious Belief and Extraterrestrial Life,” which is available on her website. She has appeared as an on-camera commentator on fifty-five television and video productions. Additionally, she has spoken on innumerable radio shows and podcasts and has lectured across the United States and to audiences in foreign countries. She has authored and coauthored numerous books and articles in UFO magazines and journals. Two of her books are available in foreign languages. She is the recipient of two major awards (MUFON and the International UFO Congress), for her years of dedicated work. Her books also include, The Alien Abduction Files, Forbidden Knowledge, Extraterrestrial Contact, Science Was Wrong, Fact, Fiction and Flying Saucers, True Stories of Alien Abduction, Making Contact and more. Some of her co-writers include Denise Stoner and Stanton Friedman. LINKS: www.kathleen-marden.com https://www.facebook.com/kathleen.marden https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3472496/

Na 17ª edição da sexta temporada do podcast Na Ponta dos Dedos, Rafael Lopes e Luciano Burti recebem Sergio Sette Câmara, piloto da equipe ERT da Fórmula E para um papo sobre sua carreira. Além disso, tudo sobre o regulamento da Fórmula para 2026 e a prévia do GP da Espanha de Fórmula 1.

Join Nick Hutson and special guest Adam for an adrenaline-pumping episode of ERT as they dive into the excitement of Hyperia's grand opening day at Thorpe Park! In this episode, the duo shares firsthand experiences, breaking down every twist, turn, and drop of this highly anticipated roller coaster. But the thrill doesn't stop there. Nick and Adam also take a deep dive into Europa Park's Voltron, comparing its unique elements and overall ride experience with Hyperia. From innovative ride technology to theming and guest reactions, they leave no stone unturned in this roller coaster showdown.

Die Bundesregierung verkündete am 22. Mai zum Krieg in der Ukraine stolz: „Diese Waffen und militärische Ausrüstung liefert Deutschland an die Ukraine. – Deutschland unterstützt die Ukraine mit Ausrüstungs- und Waffenlieferungen – aus Beständen der Bundeswehr und durch Lieferungen der Industrie, die aus Mitteln der Ertüchtigungshilfe der Bundesregierung finanziert werden.“ – Vor wenigen Stunden verkündete dieWeiterlesen

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog The Problem: I see women and men every day who are deficient in their own production of testosterone because of age, testicular trauma, removal of their ovaries, chemotherapy, chronic illness, and medications.  The cause of testosterone deficiency is as varied as the side effects and benefits of every different type of testosterone. This means that when you hear or read a headline like the one that came out last week: “Testosterone Treatment Fails to Offer Protection Against Fractures in Men with Hypogonadism, Research Indicates” You cannot take It at face value.   This headline should read Testosterone replacement in the form of testosterone cream given at a low dose given at a low dose to men who already had osteoporosis doesn't offer protection against osteoporosis. The headlines that read the way this one is an example of the reality that everyone loves to hate testosterone. This makes informed decision making by a patient very difficult because of the jaundiced view by physicians and drug companies about replacement of one to the hormones that men and women both make when they are young, but which becomes deficient in most of my patient population as they age. Why is there all this subterfuge and confusion about testosterone replacement? I believe it is the fact that allowing American's to age out of jobs and make room for the younger workers; many people cannot afford testosterone on their own so they are jealous of those people who can and do afford it; The insurance companies don't want to pay for anything they don't have to; keeping people youthful and healthy is not a priority for American medicine based on acute care in the ER and operating room; The group of naturalists who think aging is great, are people who either are out of touch or are very young; the use of testosterone by both sexes often makes the use of other medications unnecessary (anti-hypertensives, statins, autoimmune medications, etc, and also prevents patients from getting communicable diseases so the largest industry in the US, pharamaceutical companies cannot make more and more drugs to treat each symptom and disease individually; and lastly the government has made a very safe and natural hormone scheduled like amphetamines and pain killers by the DEA. Now why are these tests misleading?  All research studied are manipulated to have a desired outcome.  You can do a lot with statistics…you can make a blue sky look black! By given too little of a medication or vitamin, or by treating a disease for too short a time, or by picking the age group such that they won't respond you can make any drug look ineffective! So when you look at the studies on testosterone, you must look for the type of testosterone: is it a cream (which turns into estrogen as it passes through the skin? Or is it an injection of testosterone cyprionate which is not equivalent to natural testosterone and lasts 2 weeks because it keeps circulating through the liver and making more and more of the byproduct DHT than pellets or pure T injection? Simply if the type of T is not the type that you are taking or are contemplating taking then you should ignore the studies conclusions because each type of T and each delivery system of T has a variety of effects, each different from one another. “One testosterone is not equal to another form of testosterone. Therefore, a study that tests one type of testosterone does not apply to other forms of testosterone.” Dr Kathy Maupin MD The factors that matter as to how much improvement you will get when you choose a form of T replacement are: Testosterone chemical structure (the best is pure testosterone like in sub dermal T pellets) Testosterone delivery systems (subdermal pellet, cream, vaginal tablet, oral, patches) The dose/day or week or month Duration of use What tissue or organ system you are studying (e.g., bone takes many years to show improvement, while muscle increases relatively quickly with T pellets) The age and condition of the patients studied The starting blood level of testosterone Total and Free testosterone. The resultant blood level of free T The length of time a man or woman has been without testosterone before treatment I see research articles every day in the many journals I read that are shared with the public, that denigrate testosterone replacement in general, while in my practice, with the most effective form of T I have found, that T pellets literally transform  men and women who have T deficiency, most of whom are recently menopausal or over 55. The successful studies that recommend testosterone seem never to make the front of journals, but this recent study about bone density made all the title pages of the digital version of journals. The result will be that doctors and patients everywhere who should treat their osteoporosis with the safest treatment available, testosterone, will be the victims of VERY expensive drugs that have more side effects and less effectiveness. Research trials no longer look for the truth.  They look for “how do we get the answer we want to , so our drug that is not testosterone, will sell?”. These headlines deceive patients and scares them from asking for testosterone treatment, which can relieve their symptoms with one hormone, Testosterone, instead of many drugs. An even greater benefit of testosterone given at the dose that relieves testosterone deficiency symptoms, this one hormone gives my patients back their quality of life. In 2002 the WHI study scared menopausal women from taking their menopausal hormone therapy (ERT and HRT) which caused these women to develop anxiety, depression, frailty, osteoporosis, dementia, poor critical thinking, fatigue and many other symptoms that required treated multiple drugs to relieve just a portion of them. Women also developed marital problems because sex was so painful that they stopped having sex with their life partners.  An unproven fear of breast cancer led to the loss of these women's quality of life! An example of one of my most severely affected patients went off her ERT (estrogen only hormone replacement) that she had been on for decades since her hysterectomy because her doctor refused to prescribe it for her.  By the time she came to me she had developed depression, suicidal thoughts, agoraphobia, frailty and osteoporosis and she refused to leave her home.  It took her months for her son, a doctor friend of mine, was able to bring her to my office to restart her treatment. Today she is still traveling all over the globe and fully enjoying her well-deserved retirement! It has been estimated that in the 5 years after the WHI demonized estrogen replacement, more than 100,000 women died of diseases related to a lack of estrogen, and more experienced a loss of quality of life.   Even now over 20 years later, many doctors have not restarted giving estrogen to their women patients. Medical Thinking and rapidly changing standards of medical care when it comes to sex hormones has affected how we live, if we live, and how many drugs and diseases we get in our lifetime.  We have effective inexpensive treatments for loss of hormones, why are we always looking for expensive and non-hormonal answers to the symptoms of menopause.  In the last year pharmaceutical companies have developed a new drug with many side effects to treat hot flashes (fezolinetant/ Veozah, another new drug for osteoporosis (Tymlos 1pen, 1 injection/day = $2,134) and even a new drug for waning sex drive (Vylessi injection 2 times a week prn 1 month is $3,066/month) , also exorbitantly expensive!  Instead of recommending replacement of relatively inexpensive hormone replacement with estradiol and testosterone (with pellets for women approximately $140/month, and for men $200/month), the Big Pharma companies try to strike it rich with multiple piece meal treatments for the symptoms of menopause and low T.   I did not even mention medication for insomnia, migraine headaches, Viagra for men, lubricants for women and many other symptoms and treatments that T and E2 completely resolve. Back to the research article in question about testosterone for men, which employed testosterone as a transdermal gel, at a low dose, and determined testosterone (over-generalization) was not effective, for building bone in osteoporotic elderly men!  This was a defective study in every way, but the most important way was that it used T gel which turns most of the T into estrogen, so the effects are really from E2, E1 in men who do not respond well to E2.  The abstract is at the bottom of this page for your reading pleasure. I hope you are more selective in the future about what you believe and question the research that criticizes testosterone treatment, estradiol treatment especially the safest delivery system, pellets, when the research is short term, and generalizes the results from one form of Testosterone or estrogen to all forms. Testosterone Treatment Fails to Offer Protection Against Fractures In Men With Hypogonadism, Research Indicates MedPage Today (1/17, Monaco) reports “testosterone treatment didn't offer protection against fractures in men with hypogonadism, a” subtrial indicated. The research found that “compared with placebo, men who were on a testosterone gel actually had a significantly higher risk for fracture.” The findings were published in the New England Journal of Medicine. HCPlive (1/17, Iapoce) reports “the findings showed the 3-year cumulative incidence of all clinical fractures was nearly 4% among those treated with testosterone, compared with 2.8% in the placebo group.” Additional “data revealed the fracture incidence was also numerically greater in the testosterone group for all other fracture endpoints.”

Send us a Text Message.Imagine stumbling upon a scene straight out of a crime thriller: child-sized tights and an adult sweatshirt discarded in the woods, hinting at sinister acts. That's precisely what happened to Dana Jaffe, whose haunting find on her Sonoma property led to an urgent call to authorities and a possible link to the ominous Polly Klaas's kidnapping case. Join me, Kiara, as we navigate the tension-filled moments of this discovery with ERT member David Alford and probe into the evidence that could unravel one of the most unsettling mysteries of our time.The shadowy past of Richard Allen Davis looms over this episode as we scrutinize the trail that law enforcement followed into the depths of his criminal history. From a lengthy rap sheet to his alarmingly premature parole, Davis's life story is a chilling reminder of the justice system's complexities and flaws. Lastly, we'll dissect the destructive relationship between Davis and Edwards, whose ill-fated romance led to a spree of betrayal and revenge. Their story is a twisted web of bigamy, robbery, and murder, revealing how deceit can corrupt and shatter lives. We'll also step into microscopic hair and fiber analysis through Alan's forensic expertise, uncovering the critical details that can decide between innocence and guilt. Prepare to be engrossed by the science and drama behind the scenes of solving the darkest crimes. Support the Show.

The ACE Spring Conference took place May 17-19, 2024 at Kings Island in Ohio. ACE members from across the region and across the country joined in the fun, which included morning and evening ERT, behind-the-scenes tours, informal takeovers, buffet meals and more.   The event also included some very special presentations from Dennis Speigel, founder and CEO of International Theme Park Services, Inc. Dennis shared his experience working on the 1977 movie Rollercoaster, Mike Koontz, Vice President and General Manager of Kings Island also presented and finally, ACE President Elizabeth Ringas and Events Director Steve Berto gave out some special awards.    Almost all of the podcast team was on hand to experience the fun and be part of this presentation. We're thrilled to bring a recording of that presentation in this episode of our podcast.   In this Episode: [1:42] Dennis Speigel shares the origins of and his role in creating the movie Rollercoaster [19:43] Mike Koontz takes the stage and shares his theme park experience and great Kings Island stories [49:55] Elizabeth Ringas and events director Steve Berto bring Chad Showalter to the stage and present several very special awards Share your ideas and thoughts about this podcast via email: podcast@aceonline.org. Visit ridewithace.com to learn more about the non-profit organization American Coaster Enthusiasts.   Join the team of ACE volunteers. Volunteering offers different ways to share your talents by: Having an impact on the future of ACE Providing opportunities for rewarding experiences Developing friendships in a small group Learning new skills or sharing your talents with ACE   Podcast Volunteer Team  Host: Jessica Gardner Producers and Correspondents: Derek Perry and Doug Perry Editor and Correspondent: Bob Randolph Show Notes: Liz Tan Production Manager: Corey Wooten Correspondents: John Davidson and Bryant Yeager

On today's Equipping You in Grace show, Dave and Richard Moore discuss the prevalence of Open Theism in the Church and the New Apostolic Reformation, including examples of Bill Johnson's teaching on Open Theism. They also have a good discussion on the importance and meaning of the sovereignty of God and the providence of God, and personal examples of how the Lord continues to grow them in the grace of God.What you'll hear in this episodeWhat open theism is and why it is so dangerous.How prevalent Open Theism is in the Church and in the New Apostolic Reformation.How and why Christians should speak out against Open Theism in the Church and the New Apostolic Reformation.The meaning and importance of the sovereignty of God, the providence of God, and concurrence for the Christian life.Examples in Bill Johnson's teaching of Open Theism.The meaning and importance of the imminence and immutability to the Christian life.About Today's GuestRichard P. Moore is an evangelist, youth pastor, and missionary in Germany since 2014. He is an experienced youth pastor and preacher. He's been in church ministry for over 20 years. He has his Bachelors in Youth Ministry and Theology and Masters of Leadership, Evangelism, and Discipleship from Columbia International University. He is currently pursuing a PhD at Bakke Graduate University. He is author of “Divergent Theology: An Inquiry Into the Theological Characteristics of the Word of Faith Third Wave Movement and The New Apostolic Reformation,” which has been translated into German called, “Entwurzelt: Aktuelle christliche Irrtümer.” Richard's podcast is called “CHURCHepreneurs.”He is married to Simone with three children together, Ana, Lydia, and Caleb. He is a youth communicator, church planting speaker, and theologian. His vision is to see youth come to know, worship, and obey Jesus authentically. Check out Richard's ministry at his website www.richardpmoore.netAnd podcast on YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/@richardm23His recent article on the New Apostolic Reformation in the Evangelical Review of Theology can be read here:https://theology.worldea.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ERT-47-2.pdfRecommended Resources:https://www.desiringgod.org/books/beyond-the-boundsThe Attributes of God by A.W. PinkSubscribing, sharing, and your feedbackYou can subscribe to Equipping You in Grace via iTunes, Google Play, or your favorite podcast catcher. If you like what you've heard, please consider leaving a rating and share it with your friends (it takes only takes a second and will go a long way to helping other people find the show). You can also connect with me on Twitter at @davejjenkins, on Facebook, or via email to share your feedback.Thanks for listening to this episode of Equipping You in Grace!

Join host Nick Hutson in this exhilarating episode of Nick Hutson's ERT as he delves into the electrifying world of theme parks with none other than UK-based YouTuber and avid Theme Park Enthusiast, Mike Jeavons. In this lively conversation, Mike shares his passion for theme parks, recounting his fondest memories and the experiences that have fueled his love for these adrenaline-pumping attractions. Together, Nick and Mike explore the possibilities of a Universal Studios Great Britain, envisioning the magic and excitement it could bring to the UK. Recorded prior to the opening of Nemesis Reborn at Alton Towers, the duo also discusses the anticipation surrounding this much-awaited coaster, speculating on its potential impact on the theme park scene. But the excitement doesn't stop there! Nick and Mike also dive into the viral sensation surrounding the ill-fated Glasgow-based Willy Wonka disaster attraction, dissecting the allure and intrigue behind this unexpected phenomenon. So, buckle up and get ready for a rollercoaster ride of laughter, insights, and thrilling discussions as Nick Huton and Mike Jeavons take you on an unforgettable journey through the world of theme parks. Whether you're a seasoned enthusiast or a curious newcomer, this episode promises to leave you exhilarated and craving your next theme park adventure. Tune in now!

Join us on this enchanting episode of where Nick takes his girlfriend Hannah on an unforgettable journey through the magical world of Orlando's Disney and Universal attractions. With Hannah experiencing America for the very first time, every moment is filled with wonder and excitement. As Nick guides Hannah through the gates of Walt Disney World, listeners are treated to the joyous reactions of someone experiencing the magic of Cinderella's Castle and thrilling rides like Space Mountain, Tron and Guardians of the Galaxy for the first time. From exploring the different themed lands to dining at Be Our Guest every moment is captured with delight. But the adventure doesn't stop there! With Universal Studios Orlando awaiting, Hannah is whisked away into the worlds of Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, and beyond. Together, Nick and Hannah brave the exhilarating rides, immerse themselves in the captivating shows, and sample the delicious cuisine offered throughout the parks. Throughout the episode, listeners are invited to share in Hannah's awe and amazement as she experiences the sights, sounds, and tastes of these iconic American destinations. From the magic of meeting beloved characters to the adrenaline rush of soaring through the skies on roller coasters, every experience is a testament to the power of friendship, love, and the universal joy found in these beloved theme parks. Tune in to this special episode of Nick's ERT as Nick and Hannah create lasting memories and embark on an adventure filled with laughter, excitement, and the magic of Orlando's most iconic attractions. Whether you're a seasoned theme park enthusiast or dreaming of your own first visit, this episode is sure to inspire and delight!

On 21 April 1967, a group of right-wing army officers seized power in Greece to prevent the election of a social democratic government led by veteran politician George Papandreou. The dictatorship, backed by the United States, lasted for seven years. Thousands of people were imprisoned, exiled and tortured. The grandson of that politician, also called George, was 14 at the time. He went on to be elected as Greece's prime minister in 2009. In February 2012, George Papandreou Junior spoke to Maria Margaronis about the night when tanks rolled through Athens and soldiers came to arrest his father. Archive audio is used by permission of ERT, the Hellenic Broadcasting Corporation.Archival audio used by permission of ERT, the Hellenic Broadcasting Corporation.(Photo: The younger George Papandreou in 2011. Credit: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg/Getty Images)