Podcasts about ERT

NALC's Emergency Response Team (ERT) deploys specially trained letter carriers to assist other members following traumatic events. In this episode, hear directly from four of our ERT members: Brooke Bollom, Bismarck, ND Branch 957; Rei Santiago, Elizabeth, NJ Branch 67; John Collins, Zanesville, OH Branch 63; Wayne Green, Winston-Salem, NC Branch 461 Links: https://fsafeds.gov/ https://nalchbp.org/  00:01:00 - Peak season 00:04:00 - National Rap Session recap 00:06:30 - Open Season 00:09:22 - Flexible Spending Account (FSA) 00:13:58 - Roundtable with ERT members

In this episode of Gangland Wire, host Gary Jenkins sits down with former FBI agent Séamus McElearney, author of Flipping Capo, for a deep dive into one of the most remarkable Mafia investigations and how he took down the DeCavalcante Family. McElearney recounts his unlikely path from the world of banking to the FBI, driven by a lifelong fascination with law enforcement. Despite being told he didn't have the “right background,” he pushed forward—eventually landing in New York's Organized Crime Squad C-10, where he investigated both the Bonanno and DeCavalcante crime families. He describes the rare and demanding experience of working two Mafia families at once, and the teamwork required to dismantle them from the inside out. As the conversation turns to his book, Flipping Capo, McElearney explains the years-long process of writing it and the rigorous FBI review needed to ensure no sensitive investigative techniques were revealed. He shares early memories of notorious boss Joe Massino, and the high-stakes surveillance and arrests that defined his career. A major focus of the episode is the arrest and flipping of Anthony Capo, a feared DeCavalcante soldier—and the first made member of that family ever to cooperate with the government. McElearney walks listeners through the tension of that operation, his calculated approach to treating Capo with respect, and the psychological tightrope that ultimately persuaded Capo to talk. That single decision triggered a domino effect of cooperation that helped bring down the New Jersey mob family many believe inspired The Sopranos. Gary and Séamus dive into the proffer process, cooperation agreements, and the behind-the-scenes strategies used to turn high-level mobsters. McElearney also draws comparisons between real mob figures and the fictional world of The Sopranos, revealing how much of the hit series was grounded in the actual cases he worked. The interview closes with McElearney's reflections on how organized crime continues to evolve. While today's mob may look different from the one he battled in the '90s, he stresses that the methods—and the money—still flow. His candid insights offer a rare look into the changing face of the American Mafia and the ongoing fight to contain it. Listen now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or your favorite podcast app. 2:26 Seamus’ FBI Journey 6:26 Inside the DeCavalcante Family 9:05 The Process of Flipping 10:27 Comparing Families 12:30 The First Cooperation 17:43 The Proffer Process 25:03 Protecting Cooperators 27:44 The Murder of Joseph Canigliaro 29:42 Life on Trial 30:28 The Real Sopranos 39:43 Leading the Columbo Squad 44:15 Major Arrests and Cases 50:57 Final Thoughts and Stories Hit me up on Venmo for a cup of coffee or a shot and a beer @ganglandwire Click here to “buy me a cup of coffee” To go to the store or make a donation or rent Ballot Theft: Burglary, Murder, Coverup, click here To rent ‘Brothers against Brothers’ or ‘Gangland Wire,’ the documentaries click here.  To purchase one of my books, click here. Transcript [0:00]Well, hey, welcome all you wiretappers. Good to be back here in studio of Gangland Wire. This is Gary Jenkins, retired Kansas City Police Intelligence Unit detective. [0:07]Welcome to Gangland Wire [0:07]I have a former FBI agent as my guest today. And, you know, I love having these FBI agents on. I’ve had a lot of them on and I worked with a lot of the guys and they’re really good guy. Everyone I ever met and worked with was a really good guy. Now they got their deadhead just like we did. But these aggressive guys are the ones that write books and I’ve got one on today. Seamus McElherney. Welcome, Seamus. Thank you. It’s great to be here. All right. Well, an Irish name now working on the Italian mob, huh? How come you weren’t working on the Westie? So they were maybe gone by the time you came around. There’s no such thing. [0:47]Oh, yeah. You got your code. You Irish guys got your code, too. All right, Seamus, you got a book, Killing, or Killing, Flipping Capo. I want to see it back up over your shoulder there. Really interesting book, guys. He flipped a guy named Anthony Capo. And he really took down the real Sopranos, if you will. So Seamus, tell us a little about how you got started with the FBI, your early career. Okay. When I got out of school, I really didn’t know what to do. And I got into banking and I just decided that was really not for me. And I got lucky where I got to meet an FBI agent. and I was just so fascinated by the work. It seemed like every day was different. You know, one day you could meet a CEO and another day you could be doing surveillance. It just, the job just seemed really interesting. [1:38]Like fascinating to me. So I decided to try to become an agent. And I was constantly told, Shane, you should never become an agent. You didn’t have the background for it. And one, one, a motto in life to me is persistence beats resistance. And I was just determined to become an agent. And back then in the late 1990s, it was a long process and it took me close to two years to actually become an agent. And I was selected to go down to training and I was very fortunate to be selected to go down to training. Now it was your first office back up in New York and the, one of the organized crime squads, or did you go out into boonies and then come back? I actually was born and raised in New York, and I was fortunate to be selected to be sent back to New York. So my first squad, I was sent back to the city, back to 26 Federal Plaza, [2:26]Seamus’ FBI Journey [2:24]and I was assigned to a squad called C-10. And C-10 was an organized crime squad, which was responsible for the Bonanno family, and then later became the DeCavocanti family as well, which I can explain to you yeah yeah we’ll get we’ll get deep into that now now let’s let me ask you a little bit about the book tell the guys a little bit about the process of writing a book from your fbi experiences. [2:47]It’s a long process. First of all, I was contacted by someone who was interested [2:55]Writing a Book [2:53]in writing a book based upon my career. People had encouraged me to write a book because I had a very successful career. And when you work organized crime, it’s never just about you. It’s about the people that you work with, right? It’s definitely a team. It’s never just one person. I had great supervisors. I had great teammates. I had a great partner. And so I was approached to write a book. So then I had no idea. So there was an agent, a famous agent, an undercover agent named Jack Garcia. So I kind of really leaned on him to kind of learn how to write a book. And it’s a long process. You have to get an agent, the publisher, a co-author I had. And then when you finally have all that, and you do have the manuscript ready to be written, you have to send it down to the FBI. And that is a long process. The FBI, in this instance, probably took over a year for them to review the book because what they want to make sure is you’re not revealing any investigative techniques. Fortunately for me, a lot of the information that is in the book is public information because of all the trials that I did. Interesting. Yeah, it is. It is quite a I know it was quite a process. [4:00]Now, the banana squad, you work in a banana squad. You know, we know a little bit about the banana squad. [4:07]Was Joe Pacino the boss when you first came in? Yes, he was. And I actually had the pleasure of arresting Joe as well. Ah, interesting. I did a show on Joe. He’s a really interesting guy. I know my friend, who was at the banana squad, I think just before you were, and he talked a lot of, to me personally, he won’t go on the show, but he talked a lot about Joe Massino. He said, actually, saw him in the courtroom one time later on, he hadn’t seen him in several years. And, and Joe looked across the courtroom. He said, Doug, how are you doing? He said, Joe was that kind of guy. He was real personal. He was. [4:44]Yeah, so when I first got to the squad, the supervisor at the time was a gentleman named Jack Steubing, and he had the thought process to go after Joe and his money. So there was two accountants that were assigned to a squad at that time. It was Kimberly McCaffrey and Jeff Solette, and they were targeted to go after Joe and his money. And it was a very successful case. And when we arrested Joe, I think it was in January of 2003, I believe it was, I was assigned to be part of that arrest team. Interesting. You know, McCaffrey and Sled are going to be talking about that case out at the Mob Museum sometime in the near future. I can’t remember exactly when it is. And it was a hell of a case. I think it just happened, actually. Oh, did it? Okay. I actually just spoke to Jeff, so I think it just happened about a week or two ago. Okay. Yeah, I tried to get him to come on the show, and I think maybe he was committed to doing something else, and I didn’t keep after him. And I don’t like to pester people, you know. [5:44]And Fensell was the one that said, you got to get Jeff Sillett. You got to get Jeff Sillett. When I looked into that money angle of it, that was pretty interesting about how they were laundering their money through the parking lots and just millions. And when he gave up, like $10 million or something? I mean, it’s unbelievable. Yes. And that’s that’s one of the reasons why I wrote the book is because I don’t think the public or the press really put this together where that squad, C-10, is a very unique squad where we were dismantling the two families at the same time. Half the family was working the Bonanno family and half the family was working the Cavalcanti family. So it’s a very unique squad during that six or seven year time period where we were dismantling two families at the same time. [6:26]Inside the DeCavalcanti Family [6:26]Interesting and and that gets us into the dekavocante family i could always struggle with that name for some reason but that’s all right guys know i butcher these names all the time. [6:37]Forgive me guys anyhow so you ended up working on the dekavocante family down in new jersey now that you know that’s unusual how did that come about we got we got a new jersey branch of the fbi down there too, Yes, we do. So what happened was I went to training in February of 1998. The case actually starts in January of 1998, where an individual named Ralph Guarino was the mastermind behind this, but he had the idea of robbing the World Trade Center. So he had three people that actually tried to execute that plan. They did rob the World Trade Center, but when they came out, they took their mask off and they were identified by the cameras that were actually there. So those individuals were actually arrested pretty quickly. I think two were arrested that day. The third person, I think, fled to New Mexico and was found pretty quickly. Ralph was smart enough to know that he was going to be apprehended pretty quickly. So he reached out to an agent named George Hanna, a legendary agent within the office, and George was able to convince him to become a proactive witness, meaning he would make consensual recordings. That was in January of 1998. I think it was January 14th. [7:51]Approximately nine days later, there was a murder of an individual named Joseph Canigliaro. Who was a ruthless DeKalocanti associate assigned to a wheelchair. How he got in a wheelchair was back in the 70s, a DeKalocanti soldier and him went to go collect money from a loan shark victim. And the story goes that Jim Gallo, James Gallo, actually shot Joseph Canigliaro by accident and paralyzed him. No hard feelings. It was just the course of doing their business back then. But he was paralyzed from the 70s to the 90s. He was a ruthless individual. though. And the reason that they killed him is his crew around him had him killed. They actually killed him because he was such a ruthless person and who would extort people and just really was a bad person. There were stories that he would call people over to him in his wheelchair and shoot them. So a ruthless guy. And he was killed in, I think, January 23rd of 1998. [8:50]So that’s how this case starts. Ralph Guarino, as I said, became a proactive witness. When you have a proactive witness. You just don’t know where they’re going to go. What I mean by that is you would direct him through mob associates and many guys, and you’re trying to gather evidence on tape. [9:05]The Process of Flipping [9:06]Where Ralph Guarino led us was the Brooklyn faction of the DeCavalcanti family, namely Anthony Capo, Anthony Rotondo, Vincent Palermo. [9:17]Joseph Scalfani, a whole host of DeCavalcanti people that were located in Brooklyn. And that’s how we start to build this case. Now, granted, I was just in training at that time in February of 1998. I don’t get sent back to New York until May of 1998. And from May of 1998 until December of 1998, they put you through a rotation, meaning I go through the operations center, I go through surveillance, and then I finally get assigned to C-10 in December of 1998. At that point in time, Jeff and Kim are already on the squad, so they’re operating the case against Messino. I come to the squad, and the Decalvo Canty case has now started. So I’m assigned to the Decalvo Canty portion of the squad to work them. And as I said, that’s why we’re working two parallel cases at the time. One is against the Bananos, the other is against the Jersey family. And we operate, Ralph, proactively from January 1998 up until the first set of indictments, which was in December of 1999. So compare and contrast the Banano family structure and how they operated in [10:27]Comparing Families [10:24]a DeCavocante family structure and how they operate. Were they exactly the same or were there some differences? [10:31]They’re into the same types of the rackets that the Waldemar people are into, but I would say related to the Decalvo Canty family, since they’re based in Jersey, they really had a control of the unions out there. There was two unions that they basically controlled, Local 394, which was the labor union, and they also started their own union, which was the asbestos union, which was Local 1030. [10:53]And those were controlled by the Decalvo Canty family, so that was the bread and butter of the Decalvo Canty family. So, as I said, the first set, you know, we operated Ralph proactively for almost close to two years. And then in December of 1999, we executed our first set of arrests because there was whispers that Ralph, why wasn’t he arrested yet? Where he was the mastermind behind the World Trade Center being robbed, but he hasn’t been picked up yet. So there was whispers that he might be cooperating with the government. And for his safety, that’s why we took him off off the street and we executed our first round of arrest in December of 1999. [11:33]I’m a relatively new agent. I’d only been on the squad now for a year and we arrested 39 people that day. I get assigned to arrest Anthony Capo, who’s a soldier within the Decavacanti family based out of Staten Island. And I was really surprised by that because, as I said, I was just an agent for about a year. Usually when you’re a new agent, you’re assigned to the back, you know, like we are security. I was even surprised that I was going to be on a team. And I was fortunate enough to be the team leader, which is very surprising to me. And the case was out of the Southern District of New York. And in New York, just for the public, there is two districts. There’s a Southern District of New York and the Eastern District of New York. And the Eastern District of New York also had charges on Anthony Capo as well. So for my arrest team, I had members from the Eastern District of New York as well. There was a separate squad that was looking into Anthony Capo there. [12:30]The First Cooperation [12:27]So I got the ticket to arrest Anthony Capo in December of 1999. And that’s how this case starts. [12:33]Interesting. Now, nobody’s ever flipped out of the DeCavocante family before, I believe. It’s been a pretty tight family, really rigidly controlled by this Richie the Boot. I mean, he’s a fearsome, fearsome guy. I mean, you did not want to get crossways with him. And a smaller, tighter family, it seems to me like, than the New York families. That was right. Well, like up and up until that point, up until that point and unbeknownst to me that no made member in the DeKalbacanti family had ever cooperated with the government before. [13:08]So I had watched George Hanna, how he operated Ralph Guarino for those two years, and he always treated him with respect. And prior to going to arrest Anthony Capo, Anthony Capo had had a reputation of being an extremely violent person, hated by law enforcement and even hated by a lot of people within the mob. But I was going I wasn’t going to let that, you know, use that against him. I was going to treat him with respect regardless. Right. I didn’t know I didn’t know him. I never dealt with him before. And I would basically before I went to go arrest him, I was going to study everything about him, learn everything about him. And I was going to use the approach of treating him with respect and using some mind chess when I was going to arrest him. What I mean by that is I was going to learn everything charges about him, everything about his family. I wanted him to know that I knew him like the back of my hand from head to toe, the start of the book to the end of the book. [14:02]And when I went to arrest him, I remember when we went to his house, he wasn’t there. So all the planning that you do related to going into an arrest, the checks that you do, he’s at the house, you knock on his door, and guess what? He’s not there. So his wife basically tells us that he’s at his mom’s house. So then that throws all the planning out the window, and now we go to his mom’s house. And when I met him, you know, I saw that he had a relationship with his parents, which, you know, it gives me a different perspective from what I heard from him. Interesting. And that says something about him, that’s for sure. So everything that I heard of this violent person and hated person, the way he treated law enforcement, he wasn’t that way with me. [14:49]So when I get him in the car and I start to read him his rights and start to ask him questions, every question that I would ask him, I already had the answer to, like, your date of birth, social security number. And then he would invoke his right to counsel, and then you’re not allowed to ask him any more questions. So what I would do is I would let the mind game start then. And I would ask him, you know, tell him about the charges that he had at that point in time. He was only charged with a conspiracy to murder Charlie Maggiore, who was an acting panel boss of the Decalvo Canty family. At that time, that point in time, they had three panel bosses. It was Charlie Maggiore, Jimmy Palermo and Vincent Palermo. Vincent Palermo was known as the stronger personality and really known as the acting boss. And they wanted to kill Charlie Maggiore. So he was charged with that. conspiracy to murder. And he was also charged with, I believe, stock fraud or it was mail fraud that would lead to stock fraud. So when I would question him, I would tell him, since he already invoked his right to counsel, don’t say anything, just listen to me. For an example, I would say your plan was to murder Charles Majuri. Your plan was to ring his doorbell and shoot him right there with James Gallo, Joe Macella. But you guys didn’t do that because there was a cop on the block. So instead of just doing a ring and run, you guys were going to ring and shoot him, right? [16:17]And now you’ve got to think, I told him, don’t say anything. Just listen to what I just said, right? Because I can’t have him answer any questions. And this wasn’t a question. This was a statement. Yeah. So that gives him food for thought, because you got to think, how would I know that? He doesn’t know at that point in time, this is an indictment. How do I know that? He doesn’t know who the cooperator is. He doesn’t know who made a recording. So I’m just throwing this at him. And this is the first time he’s hearing this. So it’s got to make him think, like, what else does this agent know? And I did this with the other charges as well. And then I would just throw these little tidbits at him. And then I would speak to the driver. How are you doing this? just give him food for thought. And then we just developed a bond that day, just talking sports back and forth. He actually was a cowboy fan. I’m a Steeler fan. So we have that little intensity going back and forth about that. And then we just developed a bond that day. I think that was the first time that he had an interaction with law enforcement, where it was more of a respect thing, as opposed to someone yelling at him or being contentious with him. I don’t think he’s ever or experienced that before. [17:27]Also because of his delivery as well, right? You know, it works both ways where you can, he can have his delivery really angry and that could, you know, provoke law enforcement to be angry towards him too. [17:43]The Proffer Process [17:40]So I think that helped it that way that day. And then just throughout the whole day. And I think one of the things that I do talk about within the book is just explaining processes to people, which is generally, I haven’t seen that done in a book before about how pretrial works. So what is pretrial? How cooperation works? How trial works? So I think there’s a lot of tidbits within the book that kind of explain things like that. Even some crimes, too. Like everyone hears what loan sharking is. I go into detail as to what loan sharking is and how it really works, because it’s a very profitable way to make money. So we have our day together. And, you know, then I had to meet his stepfather. I think he had heard that I treated his stepfather with respect. And then approximately a week later, I get a call from his lawyer and I basically almost fell out of my chair when his lawyer said he wanted to cooperate. [18:37]I bet. And then, yeah. And, you know, keep in mind, I’ve only been on the job for a year and I immediately call the assistant who is a seasoned assistant. Maria Barton, what was her name? And she’s really concerned, like, what did I say? Right. So I told her in these situations, less is more. I just told her I was going to call you. That’s all I said. I didn’t say anything else. Didn’t promise anything at all. I said I was going to call you. So, you know, that started with the process and then you go through a proffer. So I explained what the proffer is and how that process works. Interesting. Yeah. A proffer, guys is is like a kind of agreement you know and you you have to be totally open and admit to every crime you ever did and and we’ll cover you but to a certain point the basis you’ll lie down the basics. [19:31]Right. So what, you know, what we kind of like call it is queen for a day, right? Where you come in, we can’t use your words against you unless you lie to us, right? If you were, if you were to lie to us and then go, go to trial and, you know, we could, if you were to take the stand, we could, we could use it against you. But as long as you come in and you tell us the truth and you tell us everything, all the crimes that you’ve done. And the beauty of the mob is when they do a crime, they never do a crime alone, right? They involve a lot of people within a crime. So that’s the beauty of that. So when we have our first proffer, you know, in time, you only have a short amount of time to actually speak about this because you can only be away from jail for a certain amount of time right before the bad guys start to realize that something might be up. Right. So he comes in. And even even before that, on his on his way back, when we’re taking him back to 26 Federal Plaza, one of the things that he tells us is and it makes sense when we went to his house, he wasn’t there. He was at his mom’s house in the car ride back. He throws a little shot at me and he goes, we knew you were coming. [20:33]Meaning that there was a leak. They got a leak. Yeah. Right. So then when we have the first proffer, he explains the leak to us. And it appears allegedly there was a court reporter within the Southern District that was feeding them information. So that’s not good. And then in the proffer, he tells us about two murders. So, and there might be the bodies, a body might be buried up in Phil Lamella, who was a DeCalvo County soldier, up in Marlboro, New York. So that’s the first thing that he tells us. So these are jewels to us, right? He tells us about a leak. He tells us about two murders. Bodies might be buried. So we have to huddle and we have to decide, is he telling us the truth or not? We all decide that he’s telling us the truth. The proper takes place with George Hanna, as I mentioned him before. Kenny McCabe, a legendary Southern District investigator, and me. And in these situations, again, I’m a new agent. Less is more. I don’t want to say something stupid. So I kind of keep my mouth shut, right? And just listen. So that went really well. And that kind of started this whole process. So now, as we said before, you have… No one cooperated in 100 plus years of this family. And now we have the first [21:49]A Spiral of Cooperation [21:48]made member to cooperate. And basically, Anthony starts a spiral effect of cooperation. [21:56]After he where he reported to in the family at that particular time, since he was such a violent person and hard to control within the family himself. Well, he reported to Vincent Palermo, who was the acting panel boss out of that panel that I talked about, but viewed as the acting boss because of his strong personality. So you have Anthony cooperating. He reports to the acting boss. So from our perspective, our perspective, that’s golden, right? Because now Vinny is going to have to make a decision. Is he going to cooperate or not? And then about three months later, guess what? Vinny decides to cooperate. So now we have a soldier and we have the acting boss who’s going to cooperate. So we go from no one in a hundred years to basically two people in three months. [22:45]Then we have an associate, Victor DiChiro, decides to cooperate. So we go and we arrest him. So now we have three people in four months. So we take all their information, and they have to plead guilty, and they get a cooperation agreement. I explain all that. And when you have a cooperation agreement, as I mentioned before, Anthony was initially arrested for conspiracy to murder, and I believe it was stock fraud. When he pleads guilty, he has to plead guilty to all his crimes that he committed throughout his entire life. Off the top of my head, I remember he pled guilty to two murders. [23:23]11 murder conspiracies, boatload of extortions, and basically every other crime you could think of. And then the same thing with Vinny and Victor. We take all their information, and then we have our next series of indictments. So the first series was 39 indictments. And then the second series of indictments is in October of 2000, October 19th, which we just we just passed the 25th anniversary of that. And that was known as the hierarchy arrest, where we arrested the official boss, John Riggi. We arrested the two other panel bosses, Charlie Maggiore and Jimmy Palermo. We arrested the consigliere, Steve Vitabli, a bunch of captains and soldiers. So that’s a significant arrest, right? So now, as you know, when you have an arrest, there’s trials, there’s plea negotiations. So now we arrested 39 people plus another 13. We’re already up to like 50 something like something people out of that arrest. We get a little shockwave in the sense is that there’s an associate named Frank Scarabino. Frank Scarabino comes forward one day and tells us that there’s a contract on Anthony Capo’s family and Anthony Capo. [24:43]And also, there’s a contract on law enforcement. They want to go back to the old Sicilian ways and basically send a message. So, you know, that’s basically a little bit of a jolt where now we have to try to move Capo’s family. [25:03]Protecting Cooperators [24:59]And Capo’s in prison. He’s defenseless. And I explain all that. People have this sense of you go into the witness security program, you get a whole new life and you’re off and having a great time. They don’t realize that there are prisons within the United States that you have to go to prison. So I can’t say where the prisons are, but I kind of explain that process of how the WITSEC program works, which is run by the marshals. So that’s in that’s in the book as well. Yeah, they have a whole prisons that are just for people in WITSEC. I heard about a guy that said he was in one out west somewhere. Yeah. So and, you know, for those prisons, it’s not like you have to prove yourself. They’re all doing the same time. So they’re basically just trying to do their time and try to get out and get into the next phase of the WoodSec program. So that was kind of a jolt, right? So now we have Frank Scarabino cooperate. So now we have another person. So it’s the list is just getting more and more now. You got to stop taking cooperators and start putting people in jail for the rest of their life, man. [26:03]So it got to after that, we had like two more people cooperate. So we went from having nobody to having seven people cooperate in this period. And it’s interesting. And I know we’re going to go back and forth, but we went from 100 years of having no one to having seven people during this three year period. And since that time period, no other members have cooperated since. So we’ve started the clock again. I think we’re at 25 years plus again since no one cooperated during that period. And I mentioned the murder that we started this case, Joseph Canigliaro. So he was the guy that was in the wheelchair. So as I said, they wanted to kill him because he just tortured his crew. We were able, one of the guys who was initially arrested as part of the December 1999 arrest, he sees everybody’s, he is deciding to cooperate with the government. So he decides to cooperate. His name is Tommy DeTora. So Tommy DeTora decides to cooperate. He’s out on bail. So since he’s out on bail, we decide, let’s make him make a consensual recording. And he makes one of the best consensual recordings the Bureau has ever made. He gets everyone involved in that murder together. [27:28]And they talk about the murder from A to Z. It’s a priceless consensual recording that we used at trial. And it just, you know, one of the things that does stick in my mind is the shooter was Marty Lewis, who got a life sentence. [27:44]The Murder of Joseph Canigliaro [27:45]Marty Lewis is describing when he shot him. And he’s like, I shot him like five or six times in his car. Right. And then Marty Lewis gets out of the car. Joseph Canigliaro drives away, gets to the top of the block in Brooklyn, puts a signal on, put a signal on. And drove the traffic laws, drives to Joseph Wrightson’s house. A guy who was part of the murder conspiracy honks his horn for Joseph Wrightson to come downstairs. So can you imagine Joseph Wrightson looking down the window seeing the guy that’s supposed to be dead right now and telling him to get in the car to go to the hospital with him? [28:32]Unfortunately, when they go to the hospital one of the things that does happen is joseph brightson has uh unfortunately an nyp detective cop who’s a cousin and involves him in this as well and the cop takes shells from the car and he becomes he gets locked up by us as well they all go to trial they get convicted and. [28:55]You know, we also arrested a Genevieve’s captain related to the leak. So in total, I think the numbers were 71 defendants were convicted, 11 murders were solved, seven trials transpired. You know, as everyone knows, you have the arrest, but then you have the trials, right? And I know that from December 2002 up until November of 2003 was the year that I was on trial. There was three trials that I had, and then there was another trial. There was two trials that one was a mistrial. Then we had another trial. So during that one year, we had a year of trials, and the biggest trial I had went on for two months. [29:42]Life on Trial [29:38]So I basically had a year of no life where it was just trials. And as you know yourself, when you have trial, it’s not just you just show up at trial. You have trial prep beforehand. And then when you’re actually on trial every day, it’s 20, it’s 24, seven, you have a trial, you have trial, then at night you have to prep a witness. So there’s just constant stuff throughout the day. Yeah, really? It’s a, it’s a long, boring process for you guys. [30:05]You know, these are like what we would say the real Sopranos, you know, the Sopranos, Tom Soprano, and that’s kind of based on this New Jersey family. I tell you, that Soprano, so much of it was ripped from real life. I don’t know. They interviewed you for details. They interviewed some agents and looked some court cases in order to write those scripts. I know that. And in particular, I think of the gay member that was killed. [30:28]The Real Sopranos [30:27]You know, you guys had that down there. So there’s a lot of references in your book or things in the book that the guys will say, oh, yeah, they did that in the Sopranos. Can you tell us about some of them? [30:37]Well, the thing that was great, especially for trial, is in March of 1999, the show starts in January of 1999. And we have a consensual recording in March where we have DeCavocanti members talking about the show and them saying, saying, this is you, this is you, and this is you, which was priceless for trial. Right. It’s like a jury’s going to hear that. And even during the trial, the judge had to give the jury instructions about the show to make sure that it wouldn’t sway their decision. Then if you watch the show, the first season, the official boss in the show dies of stomach cancer. In real life, that’s happened in real life. In June of 1997, Jake Amari was the acting boss of the Decaval Canty family. He dies of stomach cancer. So that’s a… [31:40]It’s a part of the show right there. Then I know everyone sees the strip club, right? Well, the acting boss, as I told you at the time, Vincent Palermo, he had a strip club in Queens, Wiggles. [31:53]So there’s a similarity there. Then they have the meat market that they go to, right, back and forth in the show. That’s a real meat market. I don’t want to say the name of the real meat market here, but there is a real type of meat market there. We discussed the union angle, the two unions that they have. So there’s so many scams related to the unions. There’s the no show job, right, where you don’t have to show up to work. There’s the no work job where you come, but you don’t have to do any work at all. [32:26]Back then, what it was called was they had union halls, right, where you actually had to show up early in the morning. There’d be a line of people, and you would show up. It was called the shape up. and you would wait online and hopefully that you would get work that day. Well, the DeCable Cante members, they wouldn’t show up early and wait online. They would show up whenever they want and they would cut the line and they would get work. So these were their types of unions that they had. Then, as you mentioned, there was the gay angle too. So on the DeCable Cante real side, there was a guy named John D’Amato. And John D’Amato basically made himself the acting boss when John Riggie went to jail in the early 1990s. John D’Amato was part, was very close to John Gotti. There was a murder. It’s probably the most indictable murder in mob history called the murder of Fred Weiss. John Gotti wanted Fred Weiss killed because John Gotti thought that Fred Weiss was cooperating with the government. all because Fred Weiss switched lawyers. [33:35]He was paranoid that Fred Weiss was cooperating. So it became a race to kill Fred Weiss. So you had two mob families trying to kill him, the Decalvo Canty family and the Gambino family. So in total, I think either 15 people at least have either pled guilty or have been convicted of that murder. That murder happened on 9-11-1989, a horrible day, right? So, where I’m going is that happened in 89. In 1990, 1991, John D’Amato becomes the acting boss of the family. So, now he’s the acting boss of the DeKalb Alcanti family. John D’Amato had a girlfriend. His girlfriend starts to tell Anthony Capo that John D’Amato is going to sex clubs with her and they’re having sex with men. So this is this is brought to Anthony Capo’s attention. And he has to tell his superiors that we have a gay acting boss representing our family. And in his eyes, this cannot happen. Right. So he brings it to Vincent Palermo, brings it to Rudy Ferron, and the superiors that this is what’s happening. And they decide that he has to be killed. Now, also what he was doing was, and you speak to Anthony Rotondo, who also cooperated with the government. [34:58]John DeMotta was also stealing money from the family. He was borrowing money from the other families, telling him that it was for the DeCalbacanti family, but it was really to cover his game of the gambling losses that he was incurring. So those are two things that he was doing. Right. He was he was if you ask Anthony Rotondo, he says he was killed because of the gambling that he was incurring the losses. And if he asks Anthony Capo, he was killed because it was looking bad for our family, for their family, that he was a gay acting boss. And at that time, it wasn’t acceptable. Times have changed. But back then, it wasn’t an acceptable thing. And that’s similar to the show. There’s a gay angle within the show as well. [35:41]The Gay Angle in the Mob [35:42]Interesting. It’s the real Sopranos. I remember I watched that show, even going back and watch some of them every once in a while. And I just think, wow, that’s real. So, so even though the director says no one was speaking to them, it’s kind of ironic that there are a lot of like similarities between the show and real life. Yeah. And especially down there in New Jersey and, and, and their connection to the Bonanno family or to a New York, the New York families. And then also, and then also within the show is, is, is the stock stood. There’s also stocks. Oh yeah, the stock fraud. Yeah. They did a boiler room or something. And they were pumping and dumping stocks and Tony was making money out of that. So, yeah, that’s I’d forget. And then from and in real life, Bill Abrama was like the wizard of Wall Street. [36:37]So interesting. Well, you’ve had quite, quite a career. What do you think about New York organized crime now that today, you know, we just had quack, quack, Ruggiero, Ruggiero’s son and some other guys that were connected to families indicted for gambling. He’s got my gambling fraud. I haven’t really studied it yet. It is like they had some rig gambling games, which is common. Like in Kansas city, when I was working this, they would have, they would bring in guys who would love to gamble and had money businessmen. And then they’d, they’d play them for sure. They would cheat them and take a bunch of money from them. This was much more sophisticated, but that’s a, that’s a story that’s been going on a long time. You think that Bob is on a comeback from that? Ha, ha, ha, ha. [37:24]The mob has been around for 125 years. They’re not going to go away. Okay. They get smarter and they adapt. And it’s like, I haven’t read the indictment from head to toe, but they’ve used some, you know, sophisticated investigative techniques just to kind of con people. So they’re getting better, right? So some of the techniques that they use when you hear, it’s like some of the things that I saw where the poker tables that they use, the tables that they use were able to see the card. So they use some pretty, you know, slick techniques, you know, and then like some of the glasses or the contact lenses. So, you know, they’re not going to go away. They’re just going to keep on trying to rebuild. That’s why you have to continue to put resources towards them. Yeah. I think what people don’t understand for these mob guys, it’s if they don’t get out and go into legitimate business selling real estate or something like that. It’s it’s a constant scam a constant hustle every day to figure out another way to make money because they don’t have a paycheck coming in and so they got to figure out a way to make money and they got to make it fast and they got to make it big and in a short period of time it’s just constant every day every time they walk by knew a drug addict one time as a professional burglar and he said every time he’s in recovery he said every time i’ll buy a pharmacy he said in my mind I’m figuring out how to take that pharmacy off. So that’s the way these mob guys are. [38:52]And sports betting has been a staple of theirs forever. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. And the apps are getting into them a little bit, but I see what’s going on now. Also, we had these players, Trailblazers coach and a couple, three players, are now helping people rig the bets. And you go to the apps, and you bet a bunch of money on some guy who’s going to have a bad day. And then he just doesn’t show up to work. You end up being the supervisor of the Columbo squad, I see. Same as after that DeCavoconte case, and you spent all that time, you ended up getting promoted to a supervisor and you must’ve been good because they kept you right there in New York and gave you another mob squad. I know one agent here in Kansas City that was promoted and he kept the one squad here, as they called it. [39:43]Leading the Columbo Squad [39:40]And that was really unusual. Usually it’d be somebody in from out of town. So that says something about you. So tell us about your experiences doing that. [39:48]Well, after we did this case, which was about six years, I was requested to go down to run the Columbo squad. And at that time, I think the Columbo squad had eight supervisors in eight years. I really thought I was too young to be a supervisor because I only had six years on. So I was basically voluntold, I would say, to go down there. And guys, that is young. I want to tell you something. I’ve seen a lot of different Bob squad supervisors come through here in Kansas City. And and they were all you know like 20 year agents 15 18 year agents that came from somewhere else so yeah so you know again I thought I was just way too young to be a supervisor as I said I was just on the job for about six years and I was voluntold to go down there yeah and I said if I’m going to go down there there’s a couple of things just based upon what I saw a I’m not a yes man and two the squad needs some sort of stability so I went down there and I was able to stay there I was there from actually December of 2004 all the way up until June of 2013. [40:51]So we at that time when I first got there we really didn’t have a lot of cases going trying to go on so I was able to change the tactics right because I think juries had changed at that point in time where instead of having a historical witness just go on to stand and tell things, now we had shows out there, right? You had NCIS where the whole DNA-type stuff came in, so I had to change our approach, and proactive witnesses making consensual recordings were the way to go. And I think during a seven-year time period, our squad. [41:24]Did an amazing job. Now it went from C10. I went, the squad went down to, it became C38. And we made probably 1,800 recordings in a seven and a half year time period. So, which is an amazing amount of recordings. So, a lot of transcriptions too. A lot of transcriptions. And I, you know, a three-hour tape could take you a day to listen to because you’re just trying to find that little piece of information. Yeah. Because a lot of it is just talk, right? Yeah. So I think our first big case was in June of 2008. And we took down the acting boss, a bunch of captains. And that’s when things really started to take off. We had a violent soldier cooperate named Joseph Compatiello. And, you know, we talk about proffers. His first proffer, he comes in and he basically tells us that there are three bodies buried right next to each other. So the layman would think, OK, they’re right next to each other. They weren’t right next to each other they were about 1.1 miles apart from each other. [42:28]And you could be in your your room there and we’re trying to find a body it’s really hard to find so we were actually able to find two of the bodies one of the bodies was a guy named while Bill Cattullo he was the under boss of the Colombo family we found him in Formingdale Long Island he was behind a berm we were out there for about eight days and each day you know I’m getting pressure from my superiors. We’re going to find something because there’s a lot of press out there. There was another victim named Cormone Gargano who was buried. He was killed in 1994 and buried out there. Unfortunately, there was a new building built. [43:06]And we could not find him there, but he was initially killed at a body shop in Brooklyn, and they buried him in Brooklyn, and then they decided to dig him up and bring him out to Long Island. So we went back to the body shop. What the Colombo family used to do, though, is they used to kill you, bury you, and put lime on top of the body. What lime does is it kills the smell, but preserves the body. Oh, I didn’t realize that. I thought it was supposed to deteriorate the body too. I think most people bought that. So good information. So, so when we found wall of bill, basically from his, from his hips up were intact. Oh, And when related to Cormier Gargano, because they had killed him in the body shop and then dug him up and brought him out to Long Island. We went back to the shop and figuring, let’s see if we can actually see if there’s any parts of him there. And there actually were. And we’re able to get DNA and tie it back and confirm it was him. [44:15]Major Arrests and Cases [44:12]So that’s how that dismantling of the Colombo family started. And then just to fast forward a little bit in January 2011, we have I spearhead the largest FBI mob arrest where we arrested 127 people that day across the states and also went to Italy, too, to take down people. [44:32]And after that, the Bureau decides to reduce the resources dedicated to organized crime. And I then get the Bonanno family back. So C-10 merges back into my squad. And then I have the Bananos, the Columbos, and the Decafacanthes as well. So now I have all three families back. And I basically run that for another two years. And I guess my last official act as a supervisor is related to Goodfellas, where Jimmy Burke had buried a body in his basement. We saw a 43-year-old cold case murder where he killed an individual named Paul Katz, buried him in his basement. And when he went away for the point shaving, the Boston College point shaving case, well, he killed him in 1969, buried him in his basement. Then he goes to jail in the 80s. He gets fearful that the cops that he had on his payroll back in the 60s were going to talk. So he decides to have our witness at the time, Gaspar Valenti, who came forward back in the 80s, moved the body with Vincent S. Our son so they move the body but again they’re not professional so pieces are going to be back there so in 2013 we go back and we dig and we actually find pieces of paul cats and we tie that to dna to his son to his son and we confirm that it was him. [45:57]So that was my last official act as a supervisor. Talk about art, art, imitating life again, you know, in the Goodfellas, they dug up a body. In the Sopranos, they dug up a body. I think I saw another show where they dug up a body. One of them, they were like, man, this smells. [46:13]I mean, can you imagine that going back and having to dig up a body? And then, you know, and, you know, they’re just wearing t-shirts and jeans and maybe leather gloves. And they’d have to deal with all that stuff and put it in some kind of a bag can take it somewhere else oh my god you know i have a question while bill cutello that this guy was part of the the hit team that took him out do you remember anything about right i’m trying to remember i’ve read this story once he was kind of like more of a peacemaker and and if i remember right you remember what the deal was with him well back like what happens is in the early 1990s there’s a colombo war right you have the persicos versus the arena faction and one thing about the Colombos and the Persicos, they never forget. So in the early 1990s, while Bill Cotullo was on the arena side, and as I said, there was a war where approximately 13 people were killed. In the late 1990s, Ali Persico was going to be going to jail, and while Bill Cotullo thought that Ali was going to go to jail and that he would take over the family, Ali didn’t want that to happen. So basically while Vilcunzulo thought he was getting the keys to the kingdom and they were going to kill him. [47:28]And what they did is they lured him to Dino Saraceno’s house in Brooklyn and Dino Calabro lured him into the basement and shot him in the back of the head. And we had all these guys then decide to cooperate. As I said, Joe Caves was the first person to cooperate. Dino Calabro cooperated. [47:48]Sebi Saraceno cooperated. So we had a whole host of people cooperate and we were able to dismantle the Colombo family. And I’ve been extremely blessed to be part of teams that have dismantled three families, Bananos, the Columbos, and the D. Calacanti family. So, you know, as I said, and it’s never just one person. It’s always teammates, partners, and also other supervisors that I’ve had. Yeah, interesting. Yeah, it does take a lot of people to take those down. When you’re writing books, you try to make sure everybody gets a little bit of credit. Yeah. And, you know, I think, you know, the thing that was that was, you know, crazy when related to the recovery of Wild Bill is we had our evidence response team out there. And, you know, the witness takes us out there to show us where he thinks the bodies are buried. And related to Wild Bill, it was in the back of a field. And he kept on saying it was behind a berm. So we took him back there and he showed us where he thought it was. So we had our evidence response team dig. And they basically dug us an Olympic-sized pool. [48:57]We could not find him. So there was two other sites that we were trying to look at because Richie Greaves was supposed to be next to the train tracks. And as I mentioned, Cormac Gargano was next to a building that had been replaced. So my squad, actually our squad, C-38, decides, Seamus, do you mind if we get some shovels? So I was like, sure. So there was, because we were just looking at each other at the time. So my team, Vincent D’Agostino, they’re pretty close by. He got some shovels and came back. And there was like six of us. And we just started digging ourselves. So we dug in one area, nothing. Then another agent basically said, let’s dig over here. [49:38]And sure enough, like talk about, you know, I always say hard work leads to good luck. We started digging and then we found the white stuff. We found the line and jackpot. It was while Bill, he was hogtied face down with his feet up. And as soon as I saw the white stuff and then I saw, you know, like his foot, then we stopped and I said, let me go get the professionals. I ran over, I drove over, and I got the team leader from ERT. She got in the car. And, you know, of course, she’s very excited. I was like, you know, we F.M. got him, you know. And so I drove her back over there. And that’s when you kind of contain the crime scene. And we were able to find him. But, you know, it was our squad that found him. And then, as I said before, then, you know, our squad decides to go back to the body shop. And we found remnants of Carmine Gargano there. So the squad just did an amazing job but really we basically found two bodies ourselves you know and i think in my career i’ve been extremely blessed to find five you know which is just crazy well that’s not something those accountants and lawyers and stuff were trained for you need to get those former cops out there on those shovels and digging for bodies. [50:57]Final Thoughts and Stories [50:57]Well interesting this this has really been fun seamus any any other stories you can think of You want to you want to just want to tell just busting to make sure people know that’s in this book. I tell you what, guys, this is an interesting book. It’s it’s, you know, as I said, those kinds of stories and the procedures and how FBI works. There’s there’s a lot of stories in there. I don’t want to give to give the book away. You know, there’s a lot of stories even. Yeah. You know, there’s an even during that year of trials. There’s plenty of stories there. There was a blackout that that year, too. So there’s a lot of stories related to that. You know, even even the trials, there’s a lot of things that came up at trial. So I don’t want to give to give those stories away. But I think it’s a good read. As I said, I think it’s one of the few books that actually explains things because, you know, I think the public hears these words, but they don’t know what these words mean. And I just think it’s important that they do know what it means, because there’s a lot of things that go on behind the scenes, especially with the jury. Right. You know, the jury only sees what they see. There’s a lot of things that go on when the jury leaves the room between the government, the judge and also the defense attorney. So I try to bring to shed some light related to that as well. [52:13]Interesting. Well, Seamus McElherney. And the book is Flipping Capo. That’s Anthony Capo. The first guy to be flipped in the Cavalcante family ever, which led to a cascade of other mob guys flipping, didn’t it? [52:32]Sure did. Just like in a Bonanno family, you know, they start flipping there. And it just, I didn’t know where it was ever going to end. Finally, it ended. [52:41]It sure did. Well, I have to say, it’s been great to meet you. I wish you continued success. And this has been a lot of fun. All right. Yeah, it’s been great to have you on Seamus. Thanks a lot. Don’t forget, I like to ride motorcycles. So when you’re out on the streets there and you’re a big F-150, watch out for those little motorcycles when you’re out. If you have a problem with PTSD and you’ve been in the service, be sure and go to the VA website. They’ll help with your drugs and alcohol problem if you’ve got that problem or gambling. If not, you can go to Anthony Ruggiano. He’s a counselor down in Florida. He’s got a hotline on his website. If you’ve got a problem with gambling, most states will have, if you have gambling, most states will have a hotline number to call. Just have to search around for it. You know, I’ve always got stuff to sell. I got my books. I got my movies. They’re all on Amazon. I got links down below in the show notes and just go to my Amazon sales page and you can figure out what to do. I really appreciate y’all tuning in and we’ll keep coming back and doing this. Thanks guys.

ERT's legacy in space and Earth science is evolving under CEO Mark Lee. His strategy blends innovation, infrastructure, and collaboration to position the company for complex federal projects. Lee shares how ERT is scaling without compromising the mission in this episode of "Government Contractors to Watch" sponsored by JP Morgan Chase. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Elbvertiefung: Deichverbände feiern in Laßrönne Abschluss von Ertüchtigungsmaßnahmen für die Deiche/Grünkohl: Ernte in der Region teils abgeschlossen/Einsamkeit: Präventionsrat Uelzen veranstaltet morgen in Suderburg Symposium

NALC's Emergency Response Team (ERT) deploys specially-trained letter carriers to assist other members following traumatic events. Director of Safety and Health Manny Peralta joins the podcast to discuss the ERT. Then, we hear from four branch presidents who have used the ERT to help their members: Sandy Laemmel, President, Detroit, MI Branch 1; Monique Mate, President, Rochester, NY Branch 210; Corey Grotte, President, Eau Claire, WI Branch 728; Ted Lee, President, Pittsburgh, PA Branch 84. PLEASE NOTE: This episode discusses sensitive topics, including suicide. Please listen with care. If you're struggling, help is available by calling 988. 00:22:16 - Director of Safety and Health Manny Peralta 00:53:35 - Branch president roundtable discusses ERT

Im Herbst, wenn das Wetter kühler wird, verlagern Millionen Menschen ihre tägliche Bewegung wieder von draußen in geschlossene Räume - nicht wenige ins Fitnessstudio aufs Laufband. Schon in den 1920er Jahren bewarb eine US-amerikanische Firma für Fitnessgeräte ein Laufband zur körperlichen Ertüchtigung mit dem Slogan "Going nowhere very rapidly". Für Yves Pagès, französischer Autor und Verleger des Gallimard-Imprints Éditions Verticales, ist das Laufband im Fitnessstudio ein geradezu metaphysisches Modell des Kapitalismus. Ob das Fließband als Symbol unserer Gegenwart taugt, ob wir uns gar, wie der Geschwindigkeitstheoretiker Paul Virilio es formulierte, in einem "rasenden Stillstand" befinden, darüber diskutieren Lisz Hirn und Fahim Amir in der Ö1-"Science Arena" vom 27.10.2025

Im Herbst, wenn das Wetter kühler wird, verlagern Millionen Menschen ihre tägliche Bewegung wieder von draußen in geschlossene Räume - nicht wenige ins Fitnessstudio aufs Laufband. Schon in den 1920er Jahren bewarb eine US-amerikanische Firma für Fitnessgeräte ein Laufband zur körperlichen Ertüchtigung mit dem Slogan "Going nowhere very rapidly". Für Yves Pagès, französischer Autor und Verleger des Gallimard-Imprints Éditions Verticales, ist das Laufband im Fitnessstudio ein geradezu metaphysisches Modell des Kapitalismus. Ob das Fließband als Symbol unserer Gegenwart taugt, ob wir uns gar, wie der Geschwindigkeitstheoretiker Paul Virilio es formulierte, in einem "rasenden Stillstand" befinden, darüber diskutieren Lisz Hirn und Fahim Amir in der Ö1-"Science Arena" vom 27.10.2025

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog You will learn: What holds up new treatments for diseases and conditions How long the FDA sits on a known safe medical medication before it is released to the public. Why safe and effective drugs are NOT approved by the FDA Why doctors are forced to use medications off label How you can help During my 44 years of medical practice, I have encountered conditions for which there is no approved medication or surgical treatment available as recognized by the American College of OBGYN or the FDA. This situation can present challenges both for physicians managing these patients and for individuals seeking relief from their symptoms. This issue is not often addressed on Dr Oz, in the news, or at medical conferences. For many conditions, physicians wait for the development of approved medications or treatments, and in the meantime may inform patients that there is currently no treatment or cure available. Some doctors may attribute a patient's concerns to aging, stating that it is a universal experience. While this may be accurate, such explanations may not provide comfort to patients seeking solutions to their symptoms. This lack of helpful guidance can discourage individuals from seeking medical care when they feel their concerns are not acknowledged. This seems to result from insurance companies prioritizing cost savings by minimizing patient care.  Every year insurance companies decrease what they pay doctors for their services, while their expenses go up, and the Government requires more and more work behind the scenes like HIPPA, OSHA, and Clia requirements that costs more to deliver the same service.  If you have a problem with the time your doctor spends with you then blame the insurance companies whose profits rise every year…Soon doctors will do what I do and only take cash.  The practice of medicine is not working in a free market. While insurance limits the prescriptions of medication to those meds that are FDA Approved, the FDA and medical specialty colleges often delay approval of new, low-risk treatments for up to 20 years after their effectiveness is demonstrated. This lengthy process should be reconsidered to treat people who are ill and suffering, now. There is plenty of research in the medical journals that explain the safety of new and effective treatments that can save peoples' lives that are not FDA approved yet. The FDA is not interested in expediting the release of medication/ devices quickly to those people who need help now. They drag out the testing of a medicine that has been effective for years and may or may not approve it. On the flip side they have approved many drugs that later are found to have severe side effects, and they just change the warnings on the medication inserts. They don't take them off the market except in severe cases. Drugs that have worked treating patients successfully are being used but are not FDA approved. These “grandfathered drugs” don't need to go through the testing that new drugs go through because they work with few well-known risks. I use many if these medications because they are inexpensive for my patients and are often more effective than new meds for the same problem. One of the drugs that the FDA has not had to approve is Armour Thyroid, a natural thyroid replacement. My experience with treatments not approved by the FDA Armour Thyroid: Armour Thyroid (AT) has been prescribed by doctors to replace thyroid hormones for about 100 years. It is natural, made from Pig thyroid. It only comes from “medical Pigs” that are raised for medical purposes.  We use medical pigs for skin grafts, and other parts of the pig to treat human diseases like heart valve replacements.  Armour Thyroid is composed of the four thyroid hormones that humans make: T4, T3, T2, T1. The synthetic thyroid replacement, Synthroid/levothyroxine is only T4.  The active form of thyroid is T3, and it requires an enzyme to convert T4 into T3. If a person can't convert T4 into active T3 then nothing improves except the blood levels of T4, and TSH. The majority of women cannot convert T4 into T3. Therefore, if they take Synthroid or levothyroxine and their doctor only checks their TSH level and not the level of free T3 and free T4 to see if the Thyroid is working, then women are told that they are healed, yet they know they are not because none of their low thyroid symptoms are resolved. When this happens, doctors tell female patients that it is all in their heads and dismiss us when we tell them we are not cured with this synthetic T4 medication. Yet Synthroid is a chemical, and AT is natural from medical pigs, so the FDA is trying to Bann the only drug that has successfully treated millions of women. PS. Synthroid was not tested on women like many other drugs that were passed through the FDA before 2014! If you think this is a small problem, think again. Thyroid hormones are vital to human life, and the thyroid gland requires Iodine in the diet. The Midwest US has no Iodine in the soil or water. Therefore, this area is overburdened with hypothyroidism. I have been on AT for 50 years without complication and I have prescribed it thousands of times ever since I went into private practice.  AT works to relieve the symptoms of hypothyroidism for women and men, and it works better for women that the “new” drug Synthroid/levothyroxine, which is FDA approved. You ask how could the FDA approve a drug that doesn't successfully treat women? It is because Synthroid was not tested on women!  Until 2014 the FDA did not test women in the required drug trials.  AT works for us (women), Levothyroxine does not. Now the FDA wants to ban AT. It is not approved because it was around for decades before they started testing medications like they do now, and the history of successful treatment should stand on its own merit! Example 2: Bio-Identical Hormones BIH:  BIHs had not been approved by the FDA until recently and there was no announcement that they are now approved for women who have hormone deficiency symptoms or postmenopausal symptoms. Most doctors and women who have been afraid of the only hormones that can help them, bioidentical hormones, haven't yet been told that NOW, FINALLY the medical colleges and the FDA finally have quietly approved BI hormones.  There are no pure estradiol and pure testosterone pellets that are made by a drug company for women. My patients get their estradiol and testosterone pellets from a compounding pharmacy.  I have been prescribing BIH since 1985 without FDA approval because the oral estrogen formulations that were available at pharmacies caused weight gain and put women at high risk for blood clots. Non-oral BI hormones have fewer risks than FDA approved estrogens.  I waited more than 45 years for the FDA to approve BI hormones for treatment of women.  All those women in the last 45 years who were taking FDA approved estradiol and those who couldn't tolerate them have been harmed by FDA goals of never approving compounded or bio-identical hormones.  The delay has harmed 50% of American women. Example #3 Devices for Weight Loss I was involved in the discovery and testing of a unique device that stimulated acupuncture points with a TENS-unit-type patch connected to your cell phone for easy adjustment of your hunger or “fullness”. The FDA requires testing to approve any new device so the group of investors I was part of had to invest thousands of dollars for a device we already knew worked. The FDA told the investigators of all new devices who they should test, who they can't have in the study, and how long the testing should take. I found their parameters for the study of this device to be unrealistic. The women in our test group could not be taking hormones of any kind (birth control, ERT, HRT), and could not be on antidepressants, could not have diabetes or insulin resistance or be on any drug that assisted in weight loss. These women subjects had to be a certain BMI (level of obesity) and had to be tested repeatedly with weight and body composition measurements None of my patients who needed weight loss could participate.  Most GYN patients are on some medication or supplement, so the FDA made this study of our device so narrow that REAL WOMEN weren't tested! Sadly, we lost many women in the control group from the study because they were NOT losing weight while the ones on the device were obviously dropping pounds, so we had trouble maintaining test subjects. The testing phase of this simple device took 7 years! Our device works and no one will ever know about it or be able to use this non-medicinal weight loss device because when the FDA rejects your device you will be breaking the law if you produce and sell it directly to the public. It has no side effects or dangers..it just controls the amount you eat with stimulation of an acupuncture point. There are many ways to change this situation, and it takes years and billions of dollars to change the whole system of bringing treatments to patients quickly.  I'm afraid I won't see a revolution of the way we bring medicines and devices to market during my lifetime. Currently there is a 17-year delay between proving a drug or device works for a particular illness or condition and when it becomes available to doctors and patients. So what do we do in the meantime?  I seek treatments for patients who are unresponsive to traditional medicine by reading journals like Life Extension, that inform doctors and patients alike about new effective solutions for common medical complaints and diseases that the FDA has ignored or stymied with endless drug trials.  Life Extension Magazine highlights studies on new medications for diseases without an FDA approved solution and publicizes diagnostic tests often overlooked by mainstream publications because they are not yet FDA approved. The medical journals I read (New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Menopause, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Journal of Age management, to name a few) offer treatments for orphan diseases or even common problems that haven't been blessed by the FDA. It takes an average of 17 years from the culmination of research on a new drug, test or device until it is approved for use by the public! At the end of this Blog, I will give you a link to make your voice heard by signing a petition to shorten the approval of new treatments and medications from the average of 17 years to 3 years! My patients don't have time to wait for relief, and that may be the case for you as well. If you want to do something to help, please click this link and let the FDA know how you feel. Please sign a Petition to enact an amendment to the FOOD, DRUG and COSMETIC ACT, by going to: https://age-reversal.net/fda/

We'll call it ... the Negroni. Our theme park enthusiasts take stock of the 2025 season: predictions are reviewed, milestones are celebrated, tears of sorrow and tears of relief are shed over a bright red cocktail. Then they ask each other the big questions: Was this season good or bad? Should Bob Melvin be fired or retained? Did Buster make any mistakes? Can he make mistake? One thing is clear, no ERT for these thoosies; one ride on the Negroni was enough. Hit the dispatch music, Bob!Our new cocktail podcast, The Perfect Sip, is on hiatus but new episodes are in production. (Yeah, it's taking a long time ... life, you know?) If you haven't listened yet, you can catch up here: https://the-perfect-sip.captivate.fm/listenSpeaking of cocktails, today Ben is drinking a Negroni because he lost the bet while Matthew is drinking The Fitzgerald to taunt Ben. Recipes below.Negroni1 1/2 oz London dry gin1 1/2 oz Sweet vermouth1 1/2 oz CampariOrange twist for garnishCombine the gin, vermouth and Campari in a mixing glass with ice and stir to desired dilution. Strain the cocktail into a rocks glass and carefully add a single large chunk of ice. Express the orange twist over the glass and drop into the glass. Then trick your brother into a bet where he has to drink it. The Fitzgerald2 oz gin1 oz lemon juice1 oz simple syrup2 dashes Angostura bitters2 dashes Peychaud's bitters (Matthew's stamp)Combine all ingredients in shaker with ice. Shake 10-12 seconds. Double strain into a coupe glass. #doitforginny

The hottest event in town, Afr'Am Fest, lit up Norfolk for decades, celebrating Black joy, family, and culture. Donna Smith takes us back to the final moments of the festival--and how she fought fire with fire (extinguishers)! https://www.pilotonline.com/2008/05/31/norfolk-re-examining-afram-fest-after-residents-complaints/https://www.pilotonline.com/2010/09/01/afram-festival-organizer-closes-puts-event-in-limbo/https://elizabethrivertrail.org/https://www.nps.gov/locations/chesapeakebaywatershed/index.htmhttps://virginiahumanities.org/

Eric Jackson, a military kid, moved to the 757 in pursuit of spinning records, but it was the turn of two wheels that helped him realize Norfolk was home. https://elizabethrivertrail.org/https://www.nps.gov/locations/chesapeakebaywatershed/index.htmhttps://virginiahumanities.org/

US Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum - and chair of the influential White House National Energy Dominance Council - will be the first cabinet-level official to travel to Greece this presidential term, highlighting Greece's role as a key US partner on energy. At the same time, it looks like new developments on Capitol Hill could soon pave the way for US ambassador–nominee to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle to finally take up her post in Athens. Lena Argiri, the DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis to break all of this down.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Greece deemed critical to US energy planSenate GOP advances Guilfoyle's nomination for AthensAthens wary of domino effect of instabilityChevron entry elevates Greece geopolitically

Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: clicca qui.➨ Iscrivetevi al nostro canale Telegram: clicca quiUniversità degli Studi di Milano, aprile 2011.Registrazione parziale del convegno «Chi è Stato? La strategia della tensione in Europa (1969-1974)», organizzato dal Laboratorio Lapsus.Interventi:Aldo Giannuli, già docente di Storia contemporanea all'Università degli Studi di Milano e consulente di diverse procure (tra cui Milano, per la strage di piazza Fontana, e Brescia, per la strage di piazza della Loggia). Titolo dell'intervento: «Lo scenario internazionale tra consolidamento e rotture».Dimitri Deliolanes, corrispondente della TV greca ERT e autore di numerosi lavori sul contesto storico-politico greco. Titolo dell'intervento: «L'attività eversiva del regime dei colonnelli in Italia e in Grecia».Mirco Dondi, docente di Storia contemporanea all'Università di Bologna. Titolo dell'intervento: «L'Italia e la democrazia anomala».Tra gli argomenti trattati all'interno della registrazione: 1) Sulla corretta definizione di «strategia della tensione»; 2) La politica della distensione; 3) La teoria della «guerra rivoluzionaria»;  4) Grecia, Indonesia, America latina;  5) Il ruolo della Francia; 6) Destabilizzare per stabilizzare; 7) La firma dei trattati di Helsinki; 8) «All'insaputa della CIA». Sul regime del colonnelli, in Grecia; 9) Cipro; 10) Sulla attività eversiva dei colonnelli in Italia; 11) Il «piano Demagnetize»; 12) Le «Stay behind» europee; 13) Uomini del negoziato e trame repressive; 14) Forze armate e Confindustria; 15) Tra illegalità e complicità internazionali.

https://www.freshtopiava.com/https://elizabethrivertrail.org/https://www.nps.gov/locations/chesapeakebaywatershed/index.htmhttps://virginiahumanities.org/

https://www.newbyfoundation.org/tower-garden-projecthttps://elizabethrivertrail.org/https://www.nps.gov/locations/chesapeakebaywatershed/index.htmhttps://virginiahumanities.org/

L'émission 28 minutes du 08/08/2025 Ce vendredi, Benjamin Sportouch décrypte l'actualité en compagnie de nos clubistes : Paul Melun, essayiste et fondateur du think tank “Souverains Demain !”, Sylvie Brunel, géographe et écrivaine, Thomaïs Papaïoannou, correspondante pour la télévision publique grecque ERT et chypriote RIK, et le dessinateur de presse Eric Truant.Au programme : accord migratoire entre Paris et Londres, censure de la loi Duplomb, l'association Cuisine d'ailleurs, le plan de lutte contre la fraude sociale, le podcast du Premier ministre, l'incendie dans l'Aude, la situation à Gaza, les 80 ans du bombardement atomique d'Hiroshima, le Corail mal en point et la dysmorphie financière.Nous recevons la pâtissière Nadja Keller, cofondatrice de l'association Cuisine d'ailleurs et de l'atelier cuisine de La Cimade à Béziers, où se mélangent les cuisines du monde entier, grâce à la collaboration bénévole d'une quarantaine de cuisiniers et cuisinières hébergés Centre d'accueil des demandeurs d'asile de la Cimade. 28 minutes est le magazine d'actualité d'ARTE, présenté par Élisabeth Quin du lundi au jeudi à 20h05. Renaud Dély est aux commandes de l'émission le vendredi et le samedi. Ce podcast est coproduit par KM et ARTE Radio. Enregistrement 8 août 2025 Présentation Benjamin Sportouch Production KM, ARTE Radio

Sportlicher Wettstreit, körperliche Ertüchtigung - eigentlich genau das, worauf man keinen Bock hat, wenn man sich vor den Kassettenrekorder bettet und ein Hörspiel einlegt. Dennoch widmen sich eure beiden Power-Podcaster Felix und Linus heute der erfolgreichen Fußballhörspiel-Reihe "Teufelskicker". Eine Episode mit der Sinnlichkeit eines verschossenen Handelfmeters. Lasst euch das nicht entgehen.

Coaster Con 47 Recap - Thrills Across the Midwest! Coaster Con 47 rolled through the Midwest in June 2025, and it was a ride to remember! This six-day adventure took the American Coaster Enthusiasts to Six Flags Great America in Illinois, the charming Little Amerricka in Wisconsin and the iconic Indiana Beach. Whether you missed out and want the inside scoop, or you were there and want to relive the magic, we're breaking down all the highlights - from ERT and exclusive behind-the-scenes tours to unforgettable coaster moments and ACE camaraderie. Grab your lanyard, strap in, and join host Jessica Gardner along with Johnny McWilliams, Corey Brown and Tori Sereika for a full recap of the fun that made Coaster Con 47 unforgettable.  1:35 - Get to know Johnny McWIlliams 4:14 Say hello to Corey Brown 10:00 Meet Tori Sereika 14:10 Day 1 - Registration and Six Flags Great America   27:14 Interview with Rachel Kendziora - Regional Public Relations Manager of Midwest Six Flags parks   51:30 Day 2 - BTS Experiences, IAAPA/S&S Presentation, Landmark plaque ceremony for American Eagle, Ninth Annual Rubber Ducky Regatta    1:09:47 Day 3 - ACE Video Contest, ACE Annual Business Meeting, Tori's Auction win   1:18:50 Day 4 - Little Amerricka   1:34:27 Banquet at Great Wolf Lodge   1:36:20 Day 5 - Indiana Beach, Midway Olympics   1:46:00 Day 6 - All American Triple Loop open!   1:50:50 Post Con at Holiday World   Share your ideas and thoughts about this podcast via email: podcast@aceonline.org. Did you know anyone can join ACE? Visit ridewithace.com to learn more about the non-profit organization American Coaster Enthusiasts.   Podcast Episode Team Host: Jessica Gardner Producers: Derek Perry and Doug Perry Editor: Bob Randolph Correspondent: Gerik Gooch Production Manager: Corey Wooten        

每4万名新生儿中，就有一个“妈妈肩上的孩子”。他们生来全身松软、吸奶无力、哭声较小。随着肌肉慢慢萎缩，他们从没有力气、不会抬头、不能奔跑直至无法呼吸……这是一种罕见且足以致命的遗传性疾病“庞贝病”，2006年酶替代治疗面世，让一些患者得以长期存活。遗憾的是，传统ERT疗法需终身给药、无法穿透血脑屏障，且不同患者的疗效差异很大。但是如今，中国学者给这一致命罕见病提供了“中国方案”。

Welcome, Mama!You've just opened the door to a transformative journey, where each moment is an opportunity to embrace change & start anew.Here, we're diving into the abundance of holistic health, a space where all parts of your well-being unite.This isn't just a platform; it's a space to wake up from the unconscious flow, for authentic stories, & thought-provoking conversations that resonate with the heartbeat of motherhood.Exploring the core of holistic living that nurtures whole person health. That is your physical, mental, emotional, & spiritual sides. It's a holistic approach that acknowledges the bio-individuality of your being, recognizing that true well-being is an integration of these interconnected elements.So, buckle up, Mama!This journey promises growth, self-discovery, & the joy of nurturing every aspect of yourself.I am Tia Walden, a Holistic Nutritionist and integrative Nutrition Health Coach, focusing on prenatal and postpartum nutrition. I am the author of an Amazon best seller Obsessed with mindful eating, a heart-centered approach to nutrition, and an experienced podcaster.Above all, I am a stay-at-home mama.Together, let's navigate the twists & turns, and remember, every step is a chance to Begin Again.Chelsea is a root cause health practitioner and creator of Emotional Restoration Technique (ERT). After years of battling debilitating fatigue, skin issues, hormonal imbalances, and chronic Lyme disease, she discovered the power of true root cause healing. Through her journey, she learned how trauma and emotions profoundly impact physical health. She is now dedicated to helping women, especially mothers, heal chronic illness by combining strategic root cause work with her signature ERT method — empowering them to restore their health, energy, and emotional well-being for themselves and their families. Link to website: www.cb-wellness.org Instagram Bio: @healthfulchelsStay connected with Tia on Instagram: @tia.walden or reach out via email at tiawaldencoaching@gmail.com

Erik Nanstiel is a designer, writer, nonprofit founder and lifelong experiencer. His abduction case has been investigated byMUFON (the Mutual UFO Network) and will be presented at their July, 2025 Symposium as their "Best of the ERT," eclipsing 8,000 other reported cases that year. Prior to authoring his memoir, Erik has written for The Autism File magazine, where he shared personal insights on single parenting and communication tools for nonverbal children.His story will also be featured in a June, 2025 episode of Ancient Aliens and on Whitley Strieber's Dreamland podcast. He lives in Illinois and continues to explore the deeper meaning behind his encounters.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/night-dreams-talk-radio-with-gary-anderson--2788432/support.

Fluent Fiction - Swedish: Unearthing Vasa's Secrets: A Historian and Artist's Journey Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/sv/episode/2025-06-01-22-34-02-sv Story Transcript:Sv: Det var en varm sommardag på Vasamuseet i Stockholm.En: It was a warm summer day at the Vasamuseet in Stockholm.Sv: Solstrålar letade sig in genom de stora fönstren och belyste det gigantiska skeppet, Vasa, vars skugga vilade tungt över besökarna.En: Sunbeams filtered through the large windows, illuminating the gigantic ship, the Vasa, whose shadow lay heavily over the visitors.Sv: Lars, en ung historiker med brinnande intresse för Sveriges maritima historia, strosade runt tillsammans med Ella, en konstnär med ett öga för detaljer och en livlig fantasi.En: Lars, a young historian with a burning interest in Sweden's maritime history, strolled around together with Ella, an artist with an eye for details and a lively imagination.Sv: "I dag känns som en perfekt dag för upptäckter, eller hur, Ella?" sa Lars med ett leende.En: "Today feels like a perfect day for discoveries, don't you think, Ella?" said Lars with a smile.Sv: Ella log tillbaka.En: Ella smiled back.Sv: "Ja, kanske vi hittar något spännande."En: "Yes, maybe we'll find something exciting."Sv: De hade besökt museet många gånger, men idag kändes det annorlunda.En: They had visited the museum many times, but today felt different.Sv: Folkmassan omkring dem var upptagna med sina guider och kameror, men Lars och Ella letade efter något speciellt.En: The crowd around them were busy with their guides and cameras, but Lars and Ella were searching for something special.Sv: Plötsligt stannade Lars framför en gammal träplanka som verkade annorlunda jämfört med de andra utställda föremålen.En: Suddenly, Lars stopped in front of an old wooden plank that seemed different from the other exhibited objects.Sv: "Ser du det där?" frågade Lars och pekade på märkliga tecken ingraverade i plankan.En: "Do you see that?" asked Lars, pointing at strange characters engraved in the plank.Sv: Ella böjde sig närmare och såg på tecknen.En: Ella leaned closer and looked at the characters.Sv: "Det ser ut som ett meddelande," sade hon.En: "It looks like a message," she said.Sv: "Låt oss dokumentera det här," sa Lars och tog fram en liten anteckningsbok.En: "Let's document this," said Lars and took out a small notebook.Sv: Ella tog fram sitt skissblock och började rita.En: Ella took out her sketchpad and began to draw.Sv: De tillbringade timmar med att studera och diskutera meddelandet.En: They spent hours studying and discussing the message.Sv: Lars trodde att det kunde vara en ögonvittnesskildring från en besättningsman.En: Lars thought it could be an eyewitness account from a crew member.Sv: Ella skissade och försökte fånga känslan av de gamla tecknen på sitt papper.En: Ella sketched and tried to capture the feel of the old characters on her paper.Sv: När de delade sina teorier med museipersonalen möttes de av skepsis.En: When they shared their theories with the museum staff, they were met with skepticism.Sv: "Meddelandet är säkert bara en dekoration," sa en av tjänstemännen.En: "The message is probably just decoration," said one of the officials.Sv: Men Lars gav inte upp.En: But Lars did not give up.Sv: "Vi måste göra mer forskning. Finns det mer vi kan upptäcka?" sa han till Ella.En: "We must do more research. Is there more we can discover?" he said to Ella.Sv: Ella fortsatte att skapa detaljerade skisser av inskriptionen och hela skeppsmiljön.En: Ella continued to create detailed sketches of the inscription and the entire ship environment.Sv: Hennes konstnärliga öga letade efter dolda ledtrådar i sina teckningar, medan Lars grävde i historiska dokument.En: Her artistic eye searched for hidden clues in her drawings, while Lars dug into historical documents.Sv: Slutligen, på Midsommarafton, vilket var en kväll fylld av ljus och festlighet, samlades museistyrelsen för att höra Lars och Ellas presentation.En: Finally, on Midsommarafton, which was an evening filled with light and festivity, the museum board gathered to hear Lars and Ella's presentation.Sv: Lars visade sina forskningsresultat och Ella presenterade sina fängslande teckningar.En: Lars showcased his research findings, and Ella presented her captivating drawings.Sv: De utmanade den etablerade berättelsen om Vasa.En: They challenged the established narrative of the Vasa.Sv: "Det här kan förändra hela perspektivet på skeppets historia," förklarade Lars med övertygelse.En: "This could change the entire perspective on the ship's history," explained Lars with conviction.Sv: Efter presentationen diskuterade museets styrelse länge.En: After the presentation, the museum board discussed for a long time.Sv: Till slut sa ordföranden. "Vi kommer att undersöka detta vidare. Ert arbete är imponerande."En: Finally, the chairperson said, "We will investigate this further. Your work is impressive."Sv: Lars kände en våg av självförtroende.En: Lars felt a wave of confidence.Sv: Hans efterforskningar var betydelsefulla.En: His research was significant.Sv: Ella, med stolthet i blicken, förberedde sina skisser för en framtida utställning.En: Ella, with pride in her eyes, prepared her sketches for a future exhibition.Sv: Hon hade lärt sig att förena fakta med konstnärlig uttryckskraft.En: She had learned to unite facts with artistic expression.Sv: När de gick ut från museet denna midsommarafton kändes natten full av möjligheter.En: As they walked out of the museum this midsommarafton, the night felt full of possibilities.Sv: Genom deras upptäckter hade både Lars och Ella hittat nya vägar att följa sina passioner och förändra hur vi ser på historien.En: Through their discoveries, both Lars and Ella had found new paths to follow their passions and alter how we perceive history.Sv: Vasa skeppets skugga, en gång en tyst observatör, hade nu en ny historia att berätta.En: The Vasa ship's shadow, once a silent observer, now had a new story to tell. Vocabulary Words:illuminating: belystegigantic: gigantiskashadow: skuggahistorian: historikermaritime: maritimastrolled: strosadedetails: detaljerimagination: fantasidiscovery: upptäcktvisitor: besökareplank: träplankaengraved: ingraveradecharacters: teckendocument: dokumenteraeyewitness: ögonvittneskepticism: skepsisresearch: forskninginscription: inskriptionhidden: doldahistorical: historiskafestivity: festlighetshowcased: visadenarrative: berättelseperspective: perspektivconviction: övertygelsechairperson: ordförandesignificant: betydelsefullaexpression: uttryckskraftpossibilities: möjligheterobserver: observatör

On todays show without Charlotte the Guys talk about  the feasibility of Noah's Ark and the findings at the Dunapar site in Turkey. Glenn and Mark highlighted that mathematical models suggest six people could repopulate to 8.2 billion in 4,300 years with a 1% growth rate. The Dunapar site, believed to be a geological formation, shows a structure resembling a boat, supported by ground penetrating radar and ERT. Soil samples indicate organic matter, consistent with rotting wood. The Turkish Government has been open to archaeological studies, finding petrified wood and iron fasteners. The conversation also touched on natural selection and the impact of human activities on the Earth. The discussion centered on the feasibility of Noah's Ark being discovered in Mount Ararat, with arguments supporting its size and location. They debated the accuracy of depictions of Noah's Ark, suggesting it was more like a barge than a traditional boat. The Guys also explored the Young Earth Theory, referencing Mount St. Helens and the moon dust consistency. They discussed the potential discovery of Noah's Ark and the implications for biblical interpretation. Additionally, they touched on the historical context of alcohol consumption, suggesting Noah might have been the first to drink fermented beverages post-flood. Don't Miss IT!

Reports indicate that President Trump and members of his administration are looking for ways to circumvent or lift CAATSA sanctions and put arms sales, particularly of F-35 jets, back on the table with Turkey. They are coming up against a challenge that is significantly more complex than simply waiving sanctions. Lena Argiri, the DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis as we look into why CAATSA may not be the real obstacle standing in the way of Turkey and the F-35s.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:CAATSA sanctions not the real obstacle between Turkey and the F-35 programTurkey is not acting like a US ally, say AJC and HALC chiefsGreece hooks up undersea power link to Crete that's key to Mediterranean expansionTurkey's Erdogan appoints legal team to draft new constitution, sparking fears of extended rule

Vor der Bahnnetz-Ausbau in Basel starten kann, braucht es Ertüchtigungsbauten. Diese sollen die Ausbauprojekte für das Herzstück ermöglichen. Ein solches Projekt ist beispielsweise ein Tiefbahnhof beim Bahnhof SBB, zu diesem Schluss kommt eine Studie des Bundes. Ausserdem: - Mehr Hotelübernachtungen in Basel

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog There is a new federal rule for lab companies that requires them to report your blood tests to you as soon as they are finished, often even before your doctor has seen them.  This rule, deemed unreasonable, was established by individuals without medical expertise (politicians), who know little about interpreting lab data or the workings of doctor's offices. Sending your lab results to you before doctors can assess them is not a decision rooted in sound medical practice but rather in the notion of individual freedom. While this is important, it does not compare to having an expert interpret your results with you. The law requiring that your lab results be sent to you as soon as they are completed does not consider the fact that these results are not designed for laymen to interpret. Additionally, lab results are meant to be analyzed alongside a patient's medical history, age, gender, and medications.  The results are not tailored to report information specific to your situation, which is how a doctor would interpret them. Lab results often lack layperson-friendly explanations. This new protocol can cause anxiety, as patients may panic over results that appear abnormal, even if they are normal for their specific medical condition and treatment. Furthermore, lab companies only request your age and gender. The factors that doctors evaluate when interpreting your results are diverse and numerous, each influencing the overall interpretation. What are the considerations that doctors add to their interpretation? Menopausal status Medical conditions Healthy normal for young and healthy adults The newest recommended ranges for health Body weight Other lab values seen on the same report The problem with you getting your own lab and interpreting it as written is multifactorial: The lab is sent to you digitally with very little explanation except for reference ranges. There is no information about who you are being compared to. Other women, both men and women? Old women? Young women? Women with symptoms or women who are well without symptoms.  The reporting of the lab results to a patient directly may hide problems that need action or create fears that are unnecessary. Anxiety over your results will continue until your doctor's appointment to discuss … so you may experience unnecessary worry in many circumstances. Reference ranges make many assumptions, but labs don't input vital information about you into their computer. your age of menopause, your weight your height (or BMI) previous illnesses and your medications. if you are on hormones or testosterone   Here is a good example. The test for pituitary hormones FSH and LH. When a woman aged 45 is menopausal, and has a very high FSH and LH, the lab says it is “normal” (in the reference range), yet the woman is having severe hot flashes, night sweats, anxiety, and insomnia.  That is not healthy or “normal”. The same two tests can be used to determine if a person is menopausal. Let's say a 42-year-old woman has elevated FSH and LH, but her estradiol is very high (200-300). To the layperson, this looks like menopause, but in reality, it is the picture of ovulation, not menopause. One has to look at another test, estradiol, to determine whether she is premenopausal and ovulating or menopausal (her estradiol would be very low, and FSH and LH would be high). See the problem? Reference Ranges don't tell you what the doctor is looking for. The same two tests, FSH and LH, are used to diagnose polycystic ovaries (PCO) too.  In women without PCO, the FSH is higher than the LH, but if the LH is greater than the FSH, the diagnosis of PCO should be considered! There is no information about this interpretation in the lab report. Falling within the reference range doesn't guarantee health or absence of symptoms. If patients are to interpret their own lab results, reference ranges should reflect health in every possible scenario. FSH and LH are influenced by BCPs and menopausal HRT. Lab results should be interpreted considering the information regarding BCPs or ERT that the patient is taking. When women are on BCPs and HRT or ERT, their FSH and LH levels are suppressed to an extremely low point. If you are unaware that the patient is taking these hormones, it may appear that the diagnosis is pituitary failure affecting estrogen levels and ovulation. Only doctors can interpret this test. There should truly be a “normal” range for those undergoing hormone replacement therapy, along with a reference range that reflects overall health, rather than merely the average for your geographical area in the US or your age group. Please make an appointment with your doctor to review your lab results so you can understand how they are interpreted. If you have questions about your lab results that are concerning you, schedule a time to discuss them with your doctor. Doctors don't have the time to explain results over the phone or through email—that is what appointments are meant for. Phone calls to doctors' offices are not intended for lab result interpretation. You or your insurance will not compensate the doctor or NP for this service over the phone.   The reference ranges for many tests and medical situations are actually wrong. If you aren't trained as a doctor or Nurse practitioner who interprets metabolic lab results every day, you could get the wrong diagnosis!!! For example, when evaluating a patient for insulin resistance, the reference range was officially changed almost two decades ago. Still, the lab companies have left the normal range very high (insulin> 18). In the revised range, fasting insulin diagnoses insulin resistance if the value is > 10. The resulting outcome is that many people are not diagnosed at a time when they can be easily treated without drugs and are told that they are “normal” when they are really experiencing insulin resistance. This is misleading and just wrong! Lab values are not adjusted to your individual situation.   Many tests are adjusted for gender; however, some are specifically adjusted for women who are menstruating regarding H/H. In other words, men and women have different “normal” H/H levels in the reference range. Women who do not menstruate or who are menopausal should be compared to the same reference range as men, but that does not happen. This leads to menopausal women, who are normal, often being told they have too many red blood cells when that is not the case. Conversely, menopausal women who are truly anemic are told they are normal, which means it takes longer to diagnose their anemia from colon cancer! The H/H should have a reference range that is considered “normal” for a woman's stage in life, depending on whether she is experiencing menstrual periods or not. Many reference ranges are averages for regions of the US and vary between lab companies; therefore, they are not reliable values for comparing patients.   For instance, the Homocysteine test has a normal range that is relatively high, and each lab has different reference ranges. This test serves as a screening tool for MTHFR genetic risk related to embolic stroke and heart disease.   The suggested treatment involves methylated B vitamins; however, the interpretation on the lab printout advises taking B12 and folic acid, which, in my experience, tends to increase the number rather than decrease it. Reference ranges for nutrients, vitamins, and minerals reflect the minimum levels needed for survival, not optimal health. For example, B12 reference range levels for B12 blood levels are listed as 200-1100 pg/ml, yet I was trained to try to achieve 400 -1500 pg/ml. The lower range of the written reference range (200-400) is not healthy. The desired blood levels for vitamins are often controversial, and various medical colleges issue new recommendations on Vitamin D levels each month. Consequently, doctors must determine which level of Vitamin D to recommend for their patients. These institutions not only provide changing reference ranges but also offer differing advice on how frequently to test Vitamin D. This inconsistency arises primarily from the ongoing debate about the minimum acceptable level of Vitamin D. I have more information about your lab results next week that your doctor may not share with you. There is a lot of controversy surrounding the reference ranges on the lab sheet, and you should know the truth in case your doctor doesn't.

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog Last time we reviewed why interpreting your lab may lead you to the wrong diagnosis and treatment.  Today we continue our review of each lab panel and why the reference ranges on your lab results may not be the “Healthy Normal Range” that you should compare your results to. Lab reference ranges are established with a one-size-fits-all mentality, ignoring the numerous variables that influence blood results. Have you ever tried on a “one-size-fits-all “ANYTHING? Those clothes may fit 20% of the population but for the rest of us, the garment doesn't fit our width, weight or height! All one-size-fits-all lab reference ranges are much the same.  For example, the standardized “reference ranges” in the US serve as a one-size-fits-all “ideal range” applied to everyone, despite genetic differences, varying latitudes, and the diverse diets that characterize the American multiethnic population. This presents the first problem with using a single range for all people: variations among individuals based on differing genetic needs.  The second issue is that the ranges on the lab report indicate the minimum levels necessary for survival, not necessarily the healthiest blood levels for most individuals. Another example of one size doesn't fit all is the reference range for women's hormones. A range is displayed for cycling women, but there is no healthy range for menopausal women.  Does the range displayed refer to menopausal women with HRT, or menopausal women without HRT to treat their menopausal symptoms? Is the range based on what is healthy, or what is average? We aren't sure. Labs don't ask patients questions that could help interpret lab values. Therefore, they cannot provide a truly diagnostic reference range for any illness. They only consider gender and age, as reference ranges are solely adjusted for these two factors.  A doctor must interpret individual lab results alongside a patient's medical and surgical history, including established diseases, medications, supplements, hormonal treatments, and past lab values. For instance, laboratory companies should offer reference ranges based on whether a patient is menopausal, a woman is undergoing ERT, a man is receiving testosterone, a patient is on thyroid medication, a person is being treated for diabetes, or the diabetic tests are performed to diagnose diabetes.   Some Reference Ranges are Based on comparing results to Misleading formulas The best example of this issue is the Lipid Panel. Doctors use this panel to determine a person's risk for heart attacks caused by atherosclerosis. Most doctors don't know the formula for determining Total Cholesterol. This test doesn't predict heart disease in most patients, as the formula used to arrive at that number is not indicative of the disease. However, doctors have been advised that when   total cholesterol levels are high, a patient should start taking a statin, a drug that reduces blood cholesterol and sometimes lowers the rate of heart attacks in certain individuals, though it is rarely predictive in 50% of the population. The problem with the lipid panel is twofold: the LDL level indicates future atherosclerosis in only about 50% of the population and is not a specific test for future heart disease risk. Total cholesterol is even less predictive of heart disease because it stems from a flawed formula. Doctors interpret a high Total Cholesterol level as an indication that a patient may be at increased risk for heart disease in the future. When I test patients with elevated Total Cholesterol or high levels of LDL using a Cardiac Calcium Scan to measure plaque, only half of them actually produce plaque, and consequently, are not at risk for atherosclerotic heart disease. I believe that the Total Cholesterol number is derived from an inaccurate formula for determining a person's risk of future heart disease. The Total Cholesterol number is calculated using a flawed equation. The equation is as follows:         LDL + 1/5 Triglycerides+ HDL = Total Cholesterol Total Cholesterol = LDL (bad cholesterol) + 1/5 Triglycerides (high risk factor) + HDL (good cholesterol) Let's examine this formula simply like this:   Bad + Bad + Good does not equal Bad. Due to this incorrect formula, thousands, if not millions, of patients have been prescribed statin drugs for a lifetime without justification!  Statins carry risks. The list of side effects is extensive and includes muscle deterioration and statin-associated dementia. Unfortunately, most people who experience statin side effects are women. Women tend to have higher HDL levels than men. Additionally, they typically do not have atherosclerotic plaque until menopause and usually do not develop it after menopause if they undergo estrogen replacement therapy! This gender issue is just one of the problems with laboratory reference ranges that are not adjusted for sex. The total cholesterol values were developed solely from the blood levels of men, who typically have lower HDL levels. Women were excluded from the tests conducted to create this blood panel. For women, I dispel the myth that high total cholesterol predicts heart disease by recommending a Cardiac Calcium Scan to check for plaque. If a woman has no plaque by the age of 50 and is taking estrogen, she is unlikely to develop plaque in the future.  I still test them every 2-3 years to ensure that no metabolic changes have altered their risk, but I don't put much faith in the unreliable cholesterol blood panel. There is another blood test that has deceptive reference ranges: IGF-1 How about the GH-IGF-1 test, the test for Growth Hormone?  IGF-1 is a metabolite of GH that we can measure to determine how much the patient produces.  This hormone aids in healing and replenishing aging cells in patients after their growth is complete.  The healthy normal range with which I was trained, (150-350 MIU), has been changed to an age-adjusted normal that compares a person to others in her age category who had their blood drawn the previous year.  What is wrong with this? Growth hormone (GH) decreases with age and contributes to the declining health people experience as they grow older. Similarly, IGF-1 diminishes with age and illness, which means that the “reference range” essentially reflects that you are “average for the sick individuals who visit Quest to have their IGF-1 levels checked. ” IGF-1 levels can be enhanced through weight loss, testosterone replacement, and an increase in muscle mass. The current reference range does not indicate health or illness; it merely shows whether you fall within the average for your age group. This non-scientific method of determining “health” is widespread in contemporary medicine. By comparing aging individuals to others within the same age group, for hormones that decline with age, based on samples from sick patients who visit a specific lab in the past year, these labs label patients as “healthy” even when they are as ill as other individuals their age who go to that lab! This practice constitutes age discrimination! Regarding hormones, the levels we maintained during our fertile and youthful years correspond to the blood levels indicative of health in all individuals ages. For example: People who check their IGF-1 (Growth Hormone) levels and see a low “52 ng/ml” might feel satisfied that they are within the standard range (50-280 ng/ml). However, they may not realize that this range applies to older, unhealthy individuals, not to healthy young ones (150-350 ng/ml).  This is just one example of the issues that arise when non-medical individuals, who do not monitor these tests regularly, draw conclusions from the numbers.   Some illnesses require more than one blood test for diagnosis If you consider only one of the three tests for diabetes or prediabetes (Fasting Blood Sugar, HbA1c, and Insulin), you cannot self-diagnose as diabetic, prediabetic, insulin resistance or healthy.  Diabetes is a disease that has coincided with the rising number of obese individuals.  Both conditions affect nearly 50% of the American population. Blood tests cannot be interpreted accurately unless a patient has fasted for 12 hours; all three tests should be evaluated. When diagnosing diabetes and insulin resistance, we perform three tests to assess whether a patient has insulin resistance, prediabetes, or diabetes. These tests guide our diagnosis and inform the treatment we provide based on their results. Fasting insulin is a highly misleading test. Over 15 years ago, a significant study was conducted that was believed to change the reference ranges for fasting insulin.  The new range set for normal fasting insulin was less than 10 mIU/ml. By publishing the reference range less than 18 mIU/ml, they miss diagnosing many patients with insulin resistance HBA1C is a test that gives a value of average blood sugar over three months. The results are often used alone to determine prediabetes and diabetes; however, considering all three aspects makes the diagnosis and treatment plan more specific for the patient. FBS (fasting blood sugar) is the third diabetes test. It is generally used as a screening test that prompts the ordering of the other two blood tests; however, some patients exhibit symptoms of diabetes and insulin resistance without having elevated fasting insulin levels. Many medications can raise diabetic test values, causing a patient to seem diabetic when they are actually experiencing a side effect of the drug.  One such medication is Atorvastatin.  The solution is not treating diabetes but rather adjusting the medication.  Hormone tests are especially challenging to interpret, Especially when testing free Testosterone in women Here are the problems with the free Testosterone test itself: Women have extremely low levels of free testosterone and testosterone compared to men. I have been informed by Quest that women's free testosterone levels are not reliable with current methods because they are not always reproducible when a test is conducted twice on the same day. This leads me to believe that hormone levels do not always reflect the actual blood levels of free testosterone and estradiol. The levels of testosterone in women are based on menopausal levels of T. Women have long been thought to not produce testosterone, so the “normal” levels are quite low, and 0 used to be considered normal- until one day I managed to persuade a medical director at Quest to increase it to 0.2! Women's testosterone is influenced by their production of E2 and E1, which inactivate free T. Women vary in how their cells respond to testosterone and estradiol. Receptor sites and their genetic acceptance of hormones can mean that the same blood level of testosterone in both sexes does not produce the same effects in all patients. Some women (and men) are resistant to E2 and T, or to one of the two. This indicates that the hormone-free T level may be optimal for one woman while being ineffective in alleviating any low T symptoms for another. The latter individual is T resistant, and we currently have no means outside of research labs to determine which women are sensitive and which are resistant. This requires that doctors and NPs look beyond typical reference ranges to effectively manage E2 and T replacement for women. Lastly some labs use the total testosterone level through a formula determine the free T. This carries inherent risks of reporting the wrong active level of testosterone. Total and free testosterone blood levels for men, are derived from results of older men, rather than from the blood levels that indicate health and the levels at which men experience no symptoms. This leads men to believe they are normal, even though they are symptomatic, and they can't get treatment. There is no time to discuss the reference ranges for LH, FSH, Estradiol, and Estrone; these topics will be addressed in a future blog. I hope I have encouraged you to review your blood work with your doctor or Nurse Practitioner, and not to act as your own doctor by interpreting your blood tests.

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog Menopausal Symptoms I waited to announce the emerging research regarding the safety of post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy for breast cancer patients suffering from severe menopausal symptoms until the research finally supported my belief that women have the right to receive the treatment that they need if they accept the risks of that treatment. The past year of research (2024-2025) has produced a significant amount of research demonstrating the health risks associated from not taking hormone replacement therapy, as well as the safety of using testosterone after breast cancer and the limited risks of hormone replacement therapy following breast cancer. I have practiced women's medicine for over 40 years, and I believe that female patients should have the right to receive post-menopausal hormone therapy if they understand and accept the associated risks and benefits, as long as it is administered safely. Let me pause here to discuss how doctors ethically make decisions about treatment. First, the aim of medical treatment is to improve health and longevity while alleviating symptoms. It is a doctor's responsibility to evaluate, treat, and advise patients on the best course of therapy based on their medical training, practical experience, and the latest research. However, the third factor is often overlooked when advising patients about hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer. Doctors determine the best course of treatment by using this information and weighing the benefits of a treatment against its risks. We are trained to provide this information to patients to facilitate informed decision-making with the patient, not for the patient. This process requires time that doctors no longer have. Ah, and therein lies the problem. Doctors are trained to follow research related to the diseases and conditions they treat and to integrate that research into their practice. The basic decision-making process involves weighing the benefits of treatment (or no treatment) against the associated risks. When the benefits of a treatment outweigh its risks, it is recommended to the patient. “Recommended” means the doctor, based on current knowledge, believes it to be safer and more effective for the patient's health to pursue a specific treatment. However, this does not imply that the patient must follow the doctor's advice. A patient is autonomous and can assess the risks and benefits once informed, allowing them to refuse a treatment or request one that falls outside current medical guidelines. Doctors do not have to embark on a treatment they do not believe is beneficial or safe. Doctors have autonomy as well! Doctors in mainstream medicine adhere to “medical guidelines” established by our specialties, which represent the minimum level of care expected from a physician. However, these guidelines are often decades behind current research, meaning that the risks and benefits communicated to a patient may be outdated. A legal requirement known as informed consent mandates that a doctor inform the patient or include this information in a consent form that the patient reads and signs, detailing the procedure or treatment. If the treatment is newer than the guidelines, it is categorized as “off-label.” It is essential for the doctor to inform the patient that the treatment does not conform to current guidelines, and the patient must acknowledge the known risks associated with the treatment. At BioBalance Health®, we often find ourselves ahead of the guidelines, and my experience indicates it may take up to 20 years for the guidelines to catch up with us. Much of our treatment is considered off-label because it is current and ahead of the guidelines. It is superior to other treatments and remains safe, but risks are inherent in every treatment! Now, let's return to breast cancer and the roles of estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone replacement. Here are the facts about breast cancer: Most breast cancer patients are post-menopausal, and have symptoms of menopause Not all types of breast cancer are stimulated by estradiol or progesterone, and therefore for these cancers hormone replacement therapy is safe. Breast Cancer patients with negative nodes who have had a bilateral mastectomy are candidates for hormone replacement therapy after their treatment. The risks of estrogen replacement for ER+ breast cancer patients may promote the growth of cancer cells, while testosterone replacement lowers the risk of recurrence and alleviates certain menopausal symptoms. When testosterone is combined with estradiol, the risk of developing breast cancer in all women is reduced. Testosterone enhances the quantity and activity of cancer-fighting T-killer and T-helper white blood cells. All breast cancer patients can manage menopause symptoms using testosterone pellet therapy and vaginal estrogen without an increased risk of recurrence. Do you remember when I mentioned that the risks of treatment should be balanced with the benefits of that same treatment? Recently, numerous research articles have outlined the benefits of estradiol treatment, which I included in my 2017 book, “The Secret Female Hormone: How Testosterone Replacement Can Change Your Life.” In early 2025, the safety of taking estradiol for menopausal women confirmed the less publicized research that had come before. The Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism reported that women who underwent estradiol replacement after the age of 60 live 20% longer than those who do not take hormone replacement therapy. This challenges the guideline that advises OB-GYNs to discontinue hormone replacement therapy before the age of 60. The Benefits of Estrogen replacement after menopause, based on multiple research studies over the last 20 years is as follows: ERT alleviates symptoms such as dry vagina, painful intercourse, insomnia, hot flashes, and night sweats. Estrogen replacement prevents and treats osteoporosis in women. Testosterone replacement in women with osteoporosis can reverse the process of bone loss, bringing bone back to normal strength and decreasing fracture risk. Non-oral Testosterone and Estradiol can prevent arteriosclerotic heart disease. ERT and HRT decreases the risk of diabetes with aging. Estradiol replacement during the first decade after menopause can delay the onset of Alzheimer's disease and dementia by ten years. If you are genetically predisposed to developing Alzheimer's or dementia by age 80, E2 replacement may postpone this onset until you turn 90. Testosterone replacement in the first 10 years after menopause postpones the onset of Alzheimer's disease and dementia for an additional ten years. Testosterone boosts immune function in both sexes and diminishes the onset and severity of infectious diseases. Aging causes cognitive decline, marked by challenges in memory and thinking, and menopause speeds up this process. Testosterone and estradiol replacement therapies may aid in reversing this decline. Muscle mass decreases after menopause due to a decline in testosterone but replacing testosterone with bio-identical pellets restores muscle mass to premenopausal levels.   The latest medical article that inspired me to create this podcast was published in the journal Menopause, which discussed the challenges many women face after breast cancer treatment without hormone replacement for their severe menopausal symptoms. Here are the quotes I think you should hear: (MHT = Menopause Hormone Therapy) “Among 226 breast cancer survivors.. the menopause symptom burden was high and women's experience of menopause-related breast cancer after-care was poor. Few women felt actively involved in menopause treatment decisions.  The NICE breast cancer guideline (NG101) states that women with a history of breast cancer can be offered MHT in “exceptional” circumstances if other treatments have failed (off-label use). However, NICE does not define what “exceptional” circumstances are or who gets to decide. Up to 50% of breast cancer survivors, especially those with debilitating menopausal symptoms, may choose to accept a small increase in risk in exchange for an improved quality of life and/or to mitigate future health risks associated with chronic estrogen deficiency.  “Allowing”. women to have MHT only in “exceptional” circumstance undermines patient autonomy and limits a clinician's ability to integrate clinical knowledge and judgment with the best currently available evidence (which is decades behind clinical guidelines). Clinicians have a legal and ethical responsibility to patients to make informed treatment choices. If you have had breast cancer and are experiencing symptoms you no longer want to endure, my advice is to find a doctor with whom you can make an informed decision based on the latest research. It's important to understand and accept the risks and to sign a High-Risk Consent for HRT.  If you aren't that brave, then seek a physician who will prescribe testosterone pellets along with vaginal estradiol to alleviate some of your post-menopausal symptoms. Life is too short to follow guidelines that are 20 years out of date when you are suffering.

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog Are you menopausal and have any of the following symptoms? Hot Flashes Night Sweats Dry Vagina Painful intercourse Dry skin Lack of sex drive Lack of motivation Fatigue Depression and or anxiety Change in body composition, with fat collection in the abdomen Loss of Muscle Mass and strength Irritability Inability to remember names and places Decreased ability to problem solve Insomnia Arthritis Body pain These are all symptoms we currently are aware of associated with menopause and low testosterone.  These symptoms can be treated and reversed with bioidentical estradiol and testosterone pellets. Menopause should be treated like an illness that is universal but more severe in some women compared with others.  If your symptoms affect your lifestyle, relationships and work then you should see a doctor who treats hormone deficiency and accept treatment! However, if you allow yourself to be manipulated by a male-dominated medical system that teaches all doctors to believe that menopause is normal as women age and don't seek out hormone replacement, then you just may be setting yourself up for years of symptoms that are treated with handfuls of medications, but never get you back to normal. Just think about this for a minute: Men develop erectile dysfunction and experience muscle loss as they age, but medicine doesn't consider ED or Sarcopenia a natural aging process for men, they advocate and endorse treatment with testosterone, ED medications, injections for ED and therapy for ED, and in most cases pay for it!  If the male mentality would include women we would all be treated with estrogen and testosterone when we got to age 50 (or menopause). It is not just about the symptoms that E-T replacement can cure, but the diseases that you can avoid by taking estrogen and testosterone after menopause.  These avoidable diseases of aging include: Osteoporosis leading to broken bones and spinal stenosis. Heart disease and stroke Diabetes Alzheimer's Dx and dementia Obesity Low muscle mass and inability to walk or move independently. Autoimmune diseases Loss of blood flow to Lower extremity, resulting in amputations and inhibiting walking and running Severe arthritis Gout Worsening depression and anxiety Frailty which is what causes most older people to be placed in a nursing home. Just think it is not fate that gives you these conditions.  It is genetics plus lifestyle plus whether you replace your sex hormones or not! This decision is in your control.  If you really want a life free of debilitating disease and symptoms that are require constant medical care, then you must buck the system (that was designed to keep us from maintaining our mind and body) and look for a doctor to replace your testosterone and estradiol in a non-oral delivery system and maintain it for life. By stopping ERT or Testosterone like the ACOG doctors tell you to, you will start the symptoms all over again.  My job is to offer you the right type of help to reverse the effects of menopause…both symptoms and diseases. Your job is to decide whether you want to get help and become healthy by taking non-oral estrogen and testosterone for the rest of your life. Think of menopause as a disease and you will be more prepared to fight for your right to be treated by the medical system.

For over four years, Turkey was unable to get the Biden administration to lift CAATSA sanctions. Now, as we are seeing in various reports, this issue is back on the table following a call between President Trump and President Erdogan last week. Aside from the lifting of sanctions, the biggest prize Erdogan reportedly was after in his call with Trump was the sale of F-35 fighter jets. This comes despite the fact that Turkey's purchase of Russian S-400 missiles remains an unresolved issue. Lena Argiri, the DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis with the latest scoop from Washington, DC.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Potential upcoming developments regarding the lifting of CAATSAWill Trump betray MAGA for Turkey's Erdoğan?Fierce protests in Turkey after Erdogan rival jailedGreece's ‘nouvelle vague' sinks the Scots in GlasgowScotland relegated in Nations League as Karetsas leads Greece demolition job

Savant Syndrome er heilkennið sem lætur þig verða Erró (eða Perró) á einni nóttu, kunna alla stærðfræðina sem þú hefur strögglað við alla þína ævi eða verða Mozart bara við það eitt að heyra tónlist. Ert þú kannski með Savant Syndrome? https://www.instagram.com/jaelskan/

Greece's two-year term as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council began at the outset of 2025. Since then, Greece has been at the heart of key discussions and initiatives - from playing a role in renewing the mandate of the UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus to the Security Council adopting its resolution on maritime security in the Red Sea. Lena Argiri, the DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis as we break down Greece's priorities on the Security Council, and explain what this means for the country's global diplomatic standing.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Greece begins two-year term at UN Security CouncilUN Security Council adopts Red Sea resolution drafted by Greece, USCyprus and Chevron-led group agree on updated plan for offshore fieldCyprus and Egypt to sign natural gas commercialization agreementsGreek military eyes technological leap

About Mark Gee:Mark Gee is the Chief Growth Officer at Medecision, driving the expansion of Aerial™, a cloud-based healthcare solution that improves health outcomes, reduces costs, and enhances engagement for value-based care organizations. With extensive experience in healthcare leadership, including roles at WellSky, Ciox/Datavant, and ERT, Gee has launched innovative care solutions and spearheaded data-driven strategies to optimize operations. Holding an M.S. in Instructional Design and Lean Systems Management, he excels in disruptive innovation and strategic growth, positioning Medecision as a leader in transforming healthcare delivery and operational efficiencies.Things You'll Learn:Medecision's platform, Ariel, is designed to accept any data format and process it in real time, a crucial factor for unlocking potential use cases and overcoming the limitations of rigid systems. Traditional care management is failing because it focuses on the sickest 20% of patients, overlooking rising-risk individuals. Medecision's core goal is to deliver proactive care and act as a safety net for patients by identifying problems earlier. Many healthcare organizations have rigid data schemas that slow down implementations and limit the use of valuable data. Medecision created hyper-personalized care journeys with micro cohorts that adapt and learn from each individual's conditions. This approach allows the system to surface needs and provide appropriate resources in real time.Resources:Connect with and follow Mark Gee on LinkedIn.Follow Medecision on LinkedIn and visit their website.

In a move heralded as historic, President Joe Biden issued a presidential determination this week officially including Cyprus in three critical US defense programs. Cyprus hailed the decision allowing military sales, including arms, to the island as a milestone affirming the country's role as a pillar of stability in the Eastern Mediterranean. Lena Argiri, the DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis to look at this major development in US-Cyprus ties that paves the way for the incoming Trump administration to take this relationship to new heights.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Cyprus included in three critical US defense programsGreece has tapped 18 bln euros from EU's Recovery FundPM marks shift, nominates House speaker as next president

Derzeit übertreffen sich der designierte US-Präsident Trump und deutsche Oppositionspolitiker gegenseitig mit Forderungen, die Rüstungsausgaben zu erhöhen. Grünen-Kandidat Habeck 3,5 Prozent und der AfD-Kandidatin Weidel sind selbst Trumps 5 Prozent zu gering – mehr als dies sei „sehr wahrscheinlich“ nötig, wenn man es, so Weidel, „ernst nehme mit der Ertüchtigung der Bundeswehr undWeiterlesen

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/literary-studies

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/russian-studies

Writing in Red: Literature and Revolution Across Turkey and the Soviet Union (Columbia UP, 2024) examines political relations and literary translations between Turkey and the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s through to the 1960s. By drawing on a wide range of texts – from erotic comedy, historical fiction and film, to socialist realist novels and theatre – Ertürk argues that these works belong simultaneously to modern Turkish literature, a transnational Soviet republic of letters, and the global literary archive of world revolution. A unique textual exploration, Writing in Red offers a new account of global revolutionary literary culture. Nergis Ertürk is Associate Professor of comparative literature at Pennsylvania State University. She is the author of Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey (2011), which received the Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, and editor of the Comparative Literature Studies journal. Iva Glisic is a historian and art historian specialising in modern Russia and the Balkans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/eastern-european-studies

Immer noch Dezember. Die Weihnachtszeit hat offiziell begonnen, doch – wie könnte es anders sein – wir bleiben unserer Linie treu: der körperlichen Ertüchtigung. Toni Kroos – offiziell Rentner des Profisports [Anm. d. Red.] – berichtet uns, wie er seine Freizeit "sportlich gestaltet". Schon beim Zuhören spüren wir ein leichtes Ziehen im Trizeps nahen und um es mit Felix' Worten zu sagen: "Nee, lass mal." Felix wiederum – seines Zeichens Rennfahrer in Zivil [Anm. d. Red.] – hat aktuell ohnehin keinen Kopf für sportliche Betätigung. Zwischen Weihnachtsfeiern, Preisverleihungen und mysteriösen privaten Verpflichtungen bleibt dafür schlicht keine Zeit. Und so kommt es, dass Felix am Wochenende beeindruckende 22 Stunden auf der Autobahn verbringt und von einem Termin zum nächsten hetzt, während Toni sich in Felix' Heimat Berlin bei Ein Herz für Kinder ins Callcenter setzt und höchstpersönlich den Hörer schwingt. Auf dem roten Sofa lümmelnd, ergibt sich dann noch ein Pläuschen mit dem Vorsitzenden des ersten deutschen Spitzenschwitzvereins – nicht aber ohne morgens in Madrid noch ein paar Kilometerchen gelaufen zu sein. Natürlich, wie sollte es auch anders sein. Doch was findet der angehende Rennfahrer Felix da in seinem Briefkasten? Ein Schreiben der Polizeidirektion Berlin? Das können ja nur Weihnachtsgrüße sein. Öffnen wir den Brief doch gemeinsam und schauen mal rein. Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? [**Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte!**](https://linktr.ee/luppentv)

Nach meinem Eindruck äußern sich heute viele Zeitgenossen, Journalisten, Politiker, Bürgerinnen und Bürger über Krieg, über die Möglichkeit zum Krieg und die „Ertüchtigung“ zum Krieg – ohne dass erkennbar würde, dass sie wissen und sich vorstellen können, was Krieg bedeutet, welches Elend Krieg auslöst. „Kriegstüchtig werden“, „Russland ruinieren“ – wenn ich diese Worte höre, dannWeiterlesen

The launch of a strategic dialogue between Cyprus and the US last month was quickly followed up by another historic development: President Christodoulides' visit to the White House. With US-Cyprus ties deepening at a rapid pace, this was a chance for Christodoulides to present his strategic vision for Cyprus, including, as reports indicate, the potential future integration of Cyprus into NATO. Lena Argiri, the Washington, DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis to discuss this plan to institutionalize Cyprus' relationship with NATO, a potentially transformative opportunity for both Cyprus and the whole region.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Nicosia keeping its eye on NATO prizeEU prolongs Turkey oil-related sanctions2025 budget to support incomes against inflation, PM says

This week Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulidis will head to Washington, DC for an official meeting with President Joe Biden at the Oval Office. The invitation - which was reported on this weekend - comes as US-Cyprus relations continue to reach new heights. These past few months alone have put this positive trajectory in the spotlight, with Cyprus and the US signing a defense cooperation agreement and initiating a strategic dialogue. Lena Argiri, the Washington, DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis to look at what this White House visit means for US-Cyprus ties, especially as Cyprus emerges as a critical strategic partner for the United States.You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:Cypriot President Christodoulides to meet with Biden at the White HouseGreek president, PM attend October 28th commemoration eventsMitsotakis highlights importance of national unity ahead of ‘Ochi Day'North Macedonia seeking closer cooperation

ACE's Preservation Conference marked the end of an amazing summer of conferences, regional events and informal meetups. We round out the summer with a mega episode that recaps 2024's final national ACE event. Join us as correspondents/producers Derek and Doug Perry and co-host Jessica Gardner introduce our new correspondent Gerik Gooch to walk through this awesome weekend.   The Bertch family, owners of Lost Island Theme Park, surprised ACE by making a new coaster announcement during dinner! We can't wait to see how Firerunner enhances an already-exciting park. In this Episode:   [1:50] Meet new ACE Ride with Us correspondent Gerik Gooch! [8:50] Gerik is part of the Blusiasts (Black Enthusiasts) group [11:10] Preservation Con (aka Corn Con) introduces Lost Island Theme Park [30:35] Moving on to Adventureland for day 2, Doug Perry introduces the ride highlights [38:42] Adventureland's Tornado became an ACE Roller Coaster Landmark [40:57] Alex Payne, former Regional Public Relations Manager at Palace Entertainment, talks about the history of Adventureland [1:01:00] Day 3, Worlds of Fun!  Derek Perry shares some history of the park, the group walks through ERT and ride highlights   Check out the Preservation Conference videos on ACE's YouTube channel! Day 1: Lost Island Day 2: Adventureland Day 3: Worlds of Fun ACE Roller Coaster Landmark: Tornado   Learn more about the Blusiast in their Facebook group or on Instagram.   Share your ideas and thoughts about this podcast via email: podcast@aceonline.org. Did you know anyone can join ACE? Visit ridewithace.com to learn more about the non-profit organization American Coaster Enthusiasts.   Podcast Team  Host: Jessica Gardner Producers and Correspondents: Derek Perry and Doug Perry Editor and Correspondent: Bob Randolph Show Notes: Liz Tan Production Manager: Corey Wooten Correspondents: John Davidson and Gerik Gooch

This weekend Kathimerini reported that a US proposal is on the table that could see a resolution to the Russian S-400 missile issue that has been a thorn in the side of US-Turkey relations over the last years. This could potentially result in the lifting of CAATSA sanctions and a path for Turkey to rejoin the F35 program. Lena Argiri, the Washington, DC correspondent for ERT - the Greek Public Broadcasting Company - and Kathimerini, joins Thanos Davelis with the latest scoop from Washington, DC.Read Lena Argiri's latest piece for Kathimerini: Talks on S-400 seen nearing a compromiseYou can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:HALC makes ‘no weapons to Turkey' petition to US CongressBusy week of meetings for PM at the UN

We hear this all the time… “be authentic when you show up online”.  While this is great, the marketing world doesn't often look at it from a different lens. The lens of mindset.  This episode of The Content Queen Podcast shares what authenticity looks like from a deeper level and how you can check in to make sure you are energetic about showing up online because you do feel authentic.  If you LOVED this episode, make sure you share this on your Instagram stories and tag us @contentqueenmariah and @livingwholistically  ⁠✨⁠⁠⁠Want to learn our signature framework to help with content strategy? Take our FREE workshop⁠⁠⁠✨⁠ ⁠ KEY EPISODE TAKEAWAYS

Ert þú alltaf að hlusta á gamla tónlist? Eru kvikmyndirnar sem þú ert að horfa á bara sömu kvikmyndir aftur og aftur? Hér er sagan rakin frá afdrifaríkum hryðjuverkaárásum árið 2001 og fjallað um hvernig menning okkar mótaðist í kringum 2005 og hefur síðan lítið breyst. Algrímin valda því, að mati sérfræðinga, að allt sem við sjáum og heyrum er endurtekning eða endurvinnsla þess sem áður hefur virkað.  Annað: Trump vs. Harris kappræður Munurinn á kapítalisma og kommúnisma 9/11 og áhrifin á alheimssamfélagið Nýr iPhone og regluverksfargan Evrópusambandsins Skaðleg sálfræðiþjónusta fyrir ungt fólk með þunglyndi og kvíða Kostir áfengis

本期我们迎来了一位新朋友，也是大内第一位跨性别嘉宾——三宝。当然，三宝不是一个人来的，作为她的好友兼邻居，张无梦博士也来到了现场。除此之外，划水怪和大猛也加入了这场讨论。本期，我们无意窥探隐私或者刻意猎奇，只是想讲述一位独立个体的跨性别经历。三宝先锋的性别观点、勇于做自己的勇气也给三位顺直男带来了不小的震撼。在听完这期节目后，也欢迎大家在评论区友好讨论。更多精彩内容，欢迎收听本期节目。主播 / 相征 嘉宾 / 三宝 大猛 张无梦 音频后期 / 陆凯BBBBUDDHA音频上传 / Observer - 本节目由深夜谈谈 Midnight Network出品 -Playlist:01:57:06 Antony and the Johnsons - Hope There's SomeoneTimeline:00:06:58 三宝还是男孩时最大的困扰00:11:34 漫画小说等作品可以影响人的性别偏好吗？00:13:27 学校里被规训的男女差异00:18:39 什么是四爱？00:26:33 第一次去变装俱乐部和SM酒吧00:31:58 父母发现三宝成为跨性别者时的反应00:39:00 ERT激素替代治疗法00:45:43 使用激素治疗后身体出现的反应00:56:24 跨性别标签放大了某些社会矛盾01:05:25 一种新的儒家女性主义01:11:37 三宝的性别意识是如何被建立的？01:17:39 人在灵魂层面是没有性别差异的01:37:56 三宝关于一些女性主义问题的看法01:46:44 未来该如何谋生？ 9月14日至9月18日，由Miya带队的恋爱团「恋战冲绳」正式开始报名啦！！五天四夜，四男四女，恋综级别的行程安排。快来加入恋爱旅行团，Miya带你穿梭于冲绳的碧海蓝天之间，感受那片未被打扰的宁静与浪漫！报名详情请在大内夜市小程序搜多「冲绳恋爱团」查看！加入我们：深夜谈谈招聘CEO助理、内容运营！搜索公众号「大内密谈」查看职位描述和任职要求。请将求职信+简历+个人作品发送至邮箱jobs@midnightalks.com，并注明应聘岗位及意向城市。-深夜谈谈播客网络旗下播客：大内密谈、枕边风、空岛、随便聪明、淮海333-你还可以在这里找到我们：小红书：@深夜谈谈子、@相征terryB站：@大内密谈midnightalks视频号&抖音：@深夜谈谈子微博：@大内密谈 微信公众号：大内密谈商务合作邮箱：biz@midnightalks.com加听众群：加深夜谈谈子微信（微信号: aidanei17301214531）并回复【听众群】即可进群。

Join Nick Hutson and special guest Adam for an adrenaline-pumping episode of ERT as they dive into the excitement of Hyperia's grand opening day at Thorpe Park! In this episode, the duo shares firsthand experiences, breaking down every twist, turn, and drop of this highly anticipated roller coaster. But the thrill doesn't stop there. Nick and Adam also take a deep dive into Europa Park's Voltron, comparing its unique elements and overall ride experience with Hyperia. From innovative ride technology to theming and guest reactions, they leave no stone unturned in this roller coaster showdown.