Podcasts about Psychological research

Columbia University clinical psychologist drops in to talk about his research on resilience, PTSD, the importance of understanding resilience in the face of trauma, the biological responses to traumatic events, and the misconceptions surrounding PTSD.About our guest:George Bonanno is a Professor of Clinical Psychology at Columbia University's Teachers College and internationally recognized for his pioneering research on human resilience in the face of loss and potential trauma. He is recognized by the Web of Science as among the top one percent most cited scientists in the world, and has been honored with lifetime achievement awards by the Association for Psychological Science (APS), the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS), and the International Positive Psychology Association (IPPA). In addition to the books, The End of Trauma and The Other Side of Sadness, George has published hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific articles, many appearing in leading journals such as Nature, JAMA, American Psychologist, and the Annual Review of Psychology. He is also an avid painter (when he has time), reads widely, and loves music.

Welcome to the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Doctor Is In Series – where we will discuss understandings and developments in the field of psychology. In today's episode, Chris and Abbie are discussing Procrastination. They will talk about what it is, the causes, and reasons of why we procrastinate and the many ways you can try to overcome it. [Jan 6, 2025] 00:00 - Intro 00:16 - Dr. Abbie Maroño Intro 00:41 - Intro Links -          Social-Engineer.com - http://www.social-engineer.com/ -          Managed Voice Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/vishing-service/ -          Managed Email Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/se-phishing-service/ -          Adversarial Simulations - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/social-engineering-penetration-test/ -          Social-Engineer channel on SLACK - https://social-engineering-hq.slack.com/ssb -          CLUTCH - http://www.pro-rock.com/ -          innocentlivesfoundation.org - http://www.innocentlivesfoundation.org/                                 02:47 - The Topic of the Day: Procrastination 03:05 - Defining Procrastination 04:00 - Lack of Motivation 05:20 - Regulating Emotions 06:20 - The Intention Matters 07:55 - Self Sabotage 09:59 - Realistic Expectations 13:40 - A Setback in NOT Failure! 17:09 - Smaller Goals for Larger Achievements 20:39 - Remaining Flexible 23:25 - Dig a Little Deeper 25:03 - Finding Balance From Others 28:10 - Being Held Accountable 33:00 - The Role of Self Compassion 37:30 - Wrap Up 37:40 - Next Month: The Bystander Effect 37:50 - Outro                     -          www.social-engineer.com -          www.innocentlivesfoundation.org   Find us online: -          Twitter: @DrAbbieofficial -          LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/dr-abbie-maroño-phd -          Instagram: @DoctorAbbieofficial -          Twitter: @humanhacker -          LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/christopherhadnagy     References: Abdi Zarrin, S., & Gracia, E. (2020). Prediction of academic procrastination by fear of failure and self-regulation. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(3), 34-43. Beswick, G., Rothblum, E. D., & Mann, L. (1988). Psychological antecedents of student procrastination. Australian psychologist, 23(2), 207-217. Brownlow, S., & Reasinger, R. D. (2000). Putting off until tomorrow what is better done today: academic procrastination as a function of motivation toward college work. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15(5). Cerino, E. S. (2014). Relationships between academic motivation, self-efficacy, and academic procrastination. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 19(4). Chun Chu, A. H., & Choi, J. N. (2005). Rethinking procrastination: Positive effects of" active" procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance. The Journal of social psychology, 145(3), 245-264. Haghbin, M., McCaffrey, A., & Pychyl, T. A. (2012). The complexity of the relation between fear of failure and procrastination. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 30, 249-263. Jackson, T., Fritch, A., Nagasaka, T., & Pope, L. (2003). Procrastination and Perceptions of Past, Present, and Future. Individual Differences Research, 1(1). Katz, I., Eilot, K., & Nevo, N. (2014). “I'll do it later”: Type of motivation, self-efficacy and homework procrastination. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 111-119. Muñoz-Olano, J. F., & Hurtado-Parrado, C. (2017). Effects of goal clarification on impulsivity and academic procrastination of college students. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 49(3), 173-181. Senécal, C., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (1995). Self-regulation and academic procrastination. The journal of social psychology, 135(5), 607-619. Yosopov, L., Saklofske, D. H., Smith, M. M., Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2024). Failure sensitivity in perfectionism and procrastination: Fear of failure and overgeneralization of failure as mediators of traits and cognitions. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 07342829241249784.

How I Fail. Blog by Veronika Cheplygina https://veronikach.com/category/how-i-fail/ Arkin, R. (2011). Most Underappreciated: 50 Prominent Social Psychologists Describe Their Most Unloved Work. Oxford University Press. Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 Sharpe, D. (2013). Why the resistance to statistical innovations? Bridging the communication gap. Psychological Methods, 18(4), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034177 Anti-Creativity Letters episode: https://nulliusinverba.podbean.com/e/prologus-23-the-anticreativity-letters-r-e-nisbett Rouder, J. N., Haaf, J. M., & Snyder, H. K. (2019). Minimizing Mistakes in Psychological Science. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918801915 Firestein, S. (2015). Failure: Why Science Is So Successful (First Edition). Oxford University Press. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2019). My Biggest Research Mistake: Adventures and Misadventures in Psychological Research (1st edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Accurate reporting in psychological science is vital for ensuring reliable results. Are there statistical inconsistencies in scientific articles?     In this episode, APS's Özge Gürcanlı Fischer Baum speaks with Michele Nuijten from Tilburg University to examine how overlooked errors in statistical reporting can undermine the credibility of research findings. Together, they discuss Nuijten's research published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science and examine practical strategies to enhance the quality of psychological research.    If you're interested in learning more about this research, visit psychologicalscience.org.    Send us your thoughts and questions at underthecortex@psychologicalscience.org.

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/environmental-studies

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychology

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/public-policy

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/economics

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/politics-and-polemics

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein. In this three-part series in partnership with Canada's National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality. This is episode five of Cited Podcast's returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Should government jobs have mandatory retirement ages? Is it foolish to care about your legacy? And why did Jason always call Angela's father “Dr. Lee”? SOURCES:William Bridges, professor emeritus of American literature at Mills College, consultant, and author.Arthur Brooks, professor of leadership at Harvard University.Jimmy Carter, former President of the United States and founder of the Carter Center.Erik Erikson, 20th-century psychoanalyst.Craig Fox, professor of management at the University of California, Los Angeles.Daniel Kahneman, professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University.Mitt Romney, U.S. Senator from Utah. RESOURCES:"Congress Today Is Older Than It's Ever Been," by Geoffrey Skelley (FiveThirtyEight, 2023)."America's Bosses Just Won't Quit. That Could Spell Trouble," (The Economist, 2023)."At What Age Is Your Brain the Sharpest?" by Kendra Cherry (Verywell Mind, 2023)."Mitt Romney Announces He Won't Seek Reelection as He Calls for ‘New Generation of Leaders'," by Clare Foran (CNN, 2023).From Strength to Strength: Finding Success, Happiness, and Deep Purpose in the Second Half of Life, by Arthur Brooks (2022)."Psychological Research on Retirement," by Mo Wang and Junqi Shi (Annual Review of Psychology, 2014)."Daniel Kahneman in Conversation with Craig Fox," (2004)."The Psychology of Life Stories," by Dan P. McAdams (Review of General Psychology, 2001).Childhood and Society, by Erik Erikson (1950).Bridges Transition Model. EXTRA:"Personality: The Big Five," series by No Stupid Questions (2024)."What Does Success Look Like?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."How Do You Deal With Big Life Changes?" by No Stupid Questions (2023)."What's So Great About Retirement?" by No Stupid Questions (2022)."I Know Him," song by Jonathan Groff (Hamilton: An American Musical, 2015).

Mohammad Atari und Kollegen diskutieren die Verwendung von Large Language Models (LLMs) in der psychologischen Forschung.https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-07-ai-psychological.html Forscher des MIT haben eine Methode entwickelt, um Unsicherheitsschätzungen in Modellen des maschinellen Lernens zu verbessern.https://news.mit.edu/2024/when-to-trust-ai-model-0711 Das Startup Didero hat ein KI-Tool entwickelt, das mittelständischen Unternehmen bei der Verwaltung ihrer Lieferketten hilft.https://techcrunch.com/2024/07/17/didero-is-using-ai-to-solve-supply-chain-management-at-mid-market-companies/ Das HR-Softwareunternehmen Lattice sah sich mit Gegenwind konfrontiert, nachdem es seinen KI-Algorithmen „Rechte“ einräumte.https://futurism.com/startup-ai-rights-org-chart Visit www.integratedaisolutions.com

Mohammad Atari and colleagues discuss the use of large language models (LLMs) in psychological research.https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-07-ai-psychological.html MIT researchers have developed a method to improve uncertainty estimates in machine-learning models.https://news.mit.edu/2024/when-to-trust-ai-model-0711 Didero, a startup, has developed an AI tool to help mid-market companies manage their supply chains.https://techcrunch.com/2024/07/17/didero-is-using-ai-to-solve-supply-chain-management-at-mid-market-companies/ HR software company Lattice faced backlash after giving its AI algorithms "rights".https://futurism.com/startup-ai-rights-org-chart Visit www.integratedaisolutions.com

Mohammad Atari i współpracownicy omawiają zastosowanie dużych modeli językowych (LLM) w badaniach psychologicznych.https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-07-ai-psychological.html Naukowcy z MIT opracowali metodę poprawy szacunków niepewności w modelach uczenia maszynowego.https://news.mit.edu/2024/when-to-trust-ai-model-0711 Didero, startup, opracował narzędzie AI, które ma pomóc firmom średniej wielkości zarządzać łańcuchami dostaw.https://techcrunch.com/2024/07/17/didero-is-using-ai-to-solve-supply-chain-management-at-mid-market-companies/ Firma Lattice zajmująca się oprogramowaniem HR spotkała się z ostrymi reakcjami po przyznaniu swoim algorytmom sztucznej inteligencji „praw”.https://futurism.com/startup-ai-rights-org-chart Odwiedź www.integratedaisolutions.com

Welcome back to THE IAS COMPANION. Follow us on YouTube: ⁠www.youtube.com/@IASCompanion⁠. In today's lecture, we will discuss experimental design in psychology, a cornerstone of psychological research that allows researchers to systematically investigate cause-and-effect relationships between variables. Experimental design refers to the framework researchers use to conduct experiments and test hypotheses in controlled settings. Its purpose is to establish cause-and-effect relationships by manipulating the independent variable (IV) and observing its effect on the dependent variable (DV), while controlling for confounding variables. Practical applications of experimental design include testing therapeutic interventions, assessing teaching methods, and investigating cognitive processes. Experimental design is a fundamental tool in psychological research, allowing rigorous testing of hypotheses and contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the field. By carefully designing experiments, controlling variables, and considering ethical guidelines, psychologists can uncover meaningful insights into human behavior and cognition. #UPSC #IASprep #civilserviceexam #IASexamination #IASaspirants #UPSCjourney #IASexam #civilservice #IASgoals #UPSC2024 #IAS2024 #civilservant #IAScoaching #aUPSCmotivation #IASmotivation #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAStips #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAStips #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity

Kala Allen Omeiza is a prolific author at the intersection of race, culture, and autism. Her latest book, "Autistic and Black: Our Experiences of Growth, Progress, and Empowerment," has received widespread acclaim for its in-depth exploration of the unique challenges and triumphs faced by autistic individuals of minority backgrounds. She has also worked on various research projects on neurodiversity and mental health at Harvard, Duke, Harvard Medical, and as a US Fulbright scholar in Nigeria. She is a graduate of Miami University and a masters graduate of Psychological Research from the University of Oxford. During this episode, Kala discusses: What inspired her to write “Autistic and Black” and share the experiences of Black autistic people across the African diaspora How she uses the Kwanzaa principle of Ujima to bring the stories in the book together Her experience interviewing nonspeaking autistic individuals  Writing about her own life experiences as a Black autistic woman To find out more about Kala and her work, you can visit her website, subscribe to her newsletter, and buy her book "Autistic and Black: Our Experiences of Growth, Progress, and Empowerment". Watch the video of this interview on YouTube. Read the episode transcript. Follow the Beyond 6 Seconds podcast in your favorite podcast player. Subscribe to the FREE Beyond 6 Seconds newsletter for early access to new episodes. Support or sponsor this podcast at BuyMeACoffee.com/Beyond6Seconds! *Disclaimer: The views, guidance, opinions, and thoughts expressed in Beyond 6 Seconds episodes are solely mine and/or those of my guests, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer or other organizations.*

Smith, N. C. (1970). Replication studies: A neglected aspect of psychological research. American Psychologist, 25(10), 970–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029774

In this episode we dive deep into the intersections of technology, education, and cognitive psychology with Thor Prichard of Clarity Innovations. This week, Thor Pritchard joins us to discuss his role at Clarity Innovations, where he and his team design tech solutions that enhance educational practices. Thor draws on his personal experiences with offshore sailing to discuss the challenges and discoveries similar to those in educational technology integration.Thor's insights begin with how cognitive psychology informs the development of educational technologies, emphasizing its impact on memory, perception, and motivation. He explains how findings from decades-old psychological research are only now being applied in educational contexts, highlighting a significant delay in adopting these insights. The discussion also tackles the skepticism within educational systems toward new technologies, focusing on the discrepancies in technology perception across different levels of administration.The conversation takes a critical look at gamification in education, questioning its effectiveness and ethical implications regarding student engagement and motivation. Thor then speculates on future trends, particularly the potential of AI and machine learning to customize learning experiences and assist educators more directly.Closing the episode, Thor praises the transformative power of distance learning, comparing its potential impact to that of the historic Library of Alexandria in democratizing access to knowledge. He argues that distance learning breaks down barriers that have traditionally restricted educational access and could revolutionize how and when we learn by connecting us more effectively than ever before.This episode is essential for knowledge seekers keen to understand how the merger of psychology and technology can create more effective learning environments and reshape educational futures. Follow our podcast, share with friends, and leave us a review to help promote the innovative ways technology is revolutionizing education.Guest Links1. Clarity Innovations: https://www.clarity-innovations.com/Show Links1. Apple Knowledge Navigator Video (1987): https://youtu.be/umJsITGzXd0?si=320aFfGSulg7bSk-2. Teach FX: https://teachfx.com/Host Links1. Browse amazing virtual learning opportunities at Tami Moehring and Allyson Mitchell's CILC.org2. Seth Fleischauer's  Banyan Global Learning helps schools leverage technology for teacher and student wellness including AI literacy PD for teachers and, for students, live virtual learning experiences in Character Education: banyangloballearning.com

What are the important considerations that researchers should take when they work with underrepresented communities?  In this episode, Under the Cortex hosts Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa and Luz Garcini in follow up to their thought-provoking appearance in APS's Science for Society Webinar, “Helping Underrepresented Populations Through Community-Oriented Research.” Dr. Rodriguez Espinosa, PhD., MPH, is a native of Habana, Cuba, and a clinical psychologist by training. She is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health and also serves as the Associate Director of Research for the Office of Community Engagement at Stanford Medicine. The goal of her research is to decrease health inequities among racial/ethnic minority populations, particularly Latinx and immigrant communities, through transdisciplinary and community-engaged scholarship. Dr. Luz Garcini is the Interim Director of the Center for Community and Public Health at the Kinder Institute for Urban Research, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychological Sciences, and a faculty scholar at the Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University. Her research focuses on identifying, understanding, and addressing the health needs of historically marginalized communities from a community-engaged approach.  As experts in the field, Espinosa and Garcini share their ideas and best practices about how to center community voices in psychological research. The conversation with Özge G. Fischer-Baum highlights why such efforts are important for meaningful research with marginalized groups. Conducting research in a manner that involves the community and provides direct avenues for them to be empowered through new knowledge or addressing their needs allows research to have a more bi-directional benefit.  If you want to know more about this research, visit https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/community-research 

Aujourd'hui, on donne le micro à Olivier Dodier, Docteur en Psychologie et Maître de conférence en Psychologie Cognitive à l'Université de Nîmes, pour répondre à la question : peut-on oublier un traumatisme ?

Healthy//Toxic Healthy versus Toxic is a podcast where licensed mental health professionals explore what makes a relationship healthy or unhealthy. Our hosts aim to provide a scientifically informed perspective on what factors go into making healthy relationships, how to build secure attachment, and how to be a better parent, child, partner, or friend.  References: Jänkälä, A., Lehmuskallio, A., & Takala, T. (2019). Photo Use While Dating: From Forecasted Photos in Tinder to Creating Copresence Using Other Media. Human Technology, 15(2), 202–225. Fullwood, C., & Attrill-Smith, A. (2018). Up-Dating: Ratings of Perceived Dating Success Are Better Online than Offline. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 21(1), 11–15. Peters, S., & Salzsieder, H. (2018). What Makes You Swipe Right?:  Gender Similarity in Interpersonal Attraction in a Simulated Online Dating Context. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 23(4), 320–329. Whyte, S., & Torgler, B. (2017). Preference Versus Choice in Online Dating. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 20(3), 150–156 SHARABI, L. L., & CAUGHLIN, J. P. (2017). What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 370–391. Whitty, M. T. (2018). Do You Love Me? Psychological Characteristics of Romance Scam Victims. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 21(2), 105–109. SLATER, D. (2013). A Million First Dates How Online Dating Is Threatening Monogamy. Atlantic, 311(1), 40. Want more mental health content? Check out our other Podcasts: Mental Health // Demystified with Dr. Tracey Marks  True Crime Psychology and Personality Cluster B: A Look At Narcissism, Antisocial, Borderline, and Histrionic Disorders Here, Now, Together with Rou Reynolds   Links for Dr. Grande Dr. Grande on YouTube Produced by Ars Longa Media Learn more at arslonga.media. Produced by: Erin McCue Executive Producer: Patrick C. Beeman, MD Legal Stuff The information presented in this podcast is intended for educational and entertainment purposes only and is not professional advice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao ------------------Follow me on--------------------- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDissenterYT This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Richard Redding is Ronald D. Rotunda Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence and Professor of Psychology at Chapman University. Dr. Redding's research focuses on forensic issues in criminal law and juvenile justice, the use of social science research in law and public policy, scientific evidence, and legal education. His work in these areas is both theoretical or policy-oriented and empirical. In this episode, we talk about sociopolitical values and diversity in psychological research and clinical practice. We start by discussing the psychology of sociopolitical values, how they relate to personality traits, and how sociopolitical values can impact research. We then get into how to deal with conflicting sociopolitical values in clinical practice. -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, OLAF ALEX, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA- ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ANTON ERIKSSON, CHARLES MOREY, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, BENJAMIN GELBART, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, NIKLAS CARLSSON, ISMAËL BENSLIMANE, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, PER KRAULIS, KATE VON GOELER, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, LIAM DUNAWAY, BR, MASOUD ALIMOHAMMADI, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, ERIK ENGMAN, AND LUCY! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, AL NICK ORTIZ, AND NICK GOLDEN! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, BOGDAN KANIVETS, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!

Lucy Rocca, founder of ⁠⁠⁠⁠www.soberistas.com⁠⁠ talks to Dr Emma L Davies, Reader in Psychology at The Centre for Psychological Research, Oxford Brookes University. Lucy and Emma talk about the label ‘Responsible Drinking' and Emma's research into this and its use.

With the university academic year starting up again, a lot of Postgraduate and even undergraduate students are starting to think about research projects for their dissertations. Therefore, at some point, they will need to think about ethics and ethics applications. But why are ethics needed in psychology research? Taking a chapter out of my brand-new Ethics In Psychology book, we explore why ethics are needed in psychology research and what happens without ethical guidelines. The findings will scare you for sure. If you love psychology, research and doing the right thing, you'll enjoy this podcast episode for sure. LISTEN NOW! If you want to support the podcast, please check out: FREE AND EXCLUSIVE 8 PSYCHOLOGY BOOK BOXSET- https://www.subscribepage.io/psychologyboxset Ethics In Psychology: A Student's and Professional's Guide To Ethical Psychology Research- https://www.connorwhiteley.net/ethics-in-psychology Available from all major eBook retailers and you can order the paperback and hardback copies from Amazon, your local bookstore and local library, if you request it. Also, you can buy the eBook directly from me at https://www.payhip.com/connorwhiteley Patreon- patreon.com/ThePsychologyWorldPodcast

We are honored to be joined today by Gerd Gigerenzer. Dr. Gigerenzer is Director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy at the University of Potsdam, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg and partner of Simply Rational – The Institute for Decisions. He is former Director of the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition (ABC) at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and at the Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research in Munich, Professor of Psychology at the University of Chicago and John M. Olin Distinguished Visiting Professor, School of Law at the University of Virginia. In addition, he is Member of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences, the German Academy of Sciences and Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Philosophical Society. He was awarded honorary doctorates from the University of Basel and the Open University of the Netherlands, and is Batten Fellow at the Darden Business School, University of Virginia. Awards for his work include the AAAS Prize for the best article in the behavioral sciences, the Association of American Publishers Prize for the best book in the social and behavioral sciences, the German Psychology Award, and the Communicator Award of the German Research Foundation. His award-winning popular books Calculated Risks, Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, and Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions have been translated into 21 languages. His academic books include Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, Rationality for Mortals, Simply Rational, and Bounded Rationality (with Reinhard Selten, Nobel Laureate in economics). His most recent book, The Intelligence of Intuition, is set to be published the week we are recording this podcast! Learn more about Gerd: Connect on LinkedIn See more of his work Where to find the hosts: Brian Moon Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura Militello Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter

And Another Thing With Dave, by Dave Smith #AATWD In this episode, part 1 of 6, I am joined by Dr. Sir from the Stereo app 0:02:18 - Debating Child Transitioning and Hormones 0:06:41 - Brain Development and Sexual Discourse 0:12:04 - Identity and Mental Health Complexity 0:17:15 - Transgender Suicide Rates and Child Development Listen in as we navigate the controversial topic of a four and a half to five-year-old child's gender transitioning. Our conversation gets heated as we explore the complexities surrounding the child's choice, hormone therapies, and societal attitudes towards trans people. You'll hear perspectives from our panel including Auntie T, who firmly believes that the decision should be left to the individual when they are of an age to give informed consent. Join us as we engage in a thought-provoking discussion about the implications of early gender transitioning and how it mirrors our society's ever-evolving views. We bring to the table the concept of 'playing God', the lasting effects of hormones, and the importance of psychological and cognitive research in these life-altering decisions. Our discussion is sure to leave you pondering the question - How much of a decision should a four and a half or five-year-old be allowed to make? Shifting gears, we move towards the unsettling potential of grooming young children for gender transitioning and explore the lack of research in this area. We juxtapose the timeline of creating a vaccine with the process of transitioning, providing a stark contrast between the two. This episode is a riveting exploration of a topic that tests the boundaries of societal norms, and we hope it leaves you with plenty of food for thought. Join us, as we navigate this brave new world together. In our final segment, we steer the conversation towards potential grooming of young children for gender transitioning, exploring the consequences of this controversial decision. The conversation then shifts gears as we consider the timeline of creating a vaccine and how it contrasts starkly with the process of transitioning. Join us for this compelling and controversial conversation that pushes the boundaries of societal norms. If you are digging what I am doing, and picking up what I'm putting down, please share the podcast on social media and with friends. Reviews are greatly appreciated. You can leave a review on Podpage directly, or can access Apple Podcasts, or Spotify through podpage. Link below Thanks again!!! Follow me and find More of My Content with link below ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://linktr.ee/andanotherthingwithdave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Thank you to my listeners throughout the world. Now heard in 65 countries. According to Spotify my podcast is in the top 20% of podcasts shared internationally. Listener locations: 69% USA 11% Canada 6% United Kingdom  5% India 2% Germany 2% Romania 1% Russia less than 1% in 50 plus countries THANK YOU all !!! #aatwd #andanotherthing #davesmith #podcast #conspiracies #truther Child Gender Transitioning, Hormone Therapies, Psychological Research, Gender Identity, Family Support, Transgender People, Societal Attitudes, Grooming, Vaccines, Playing God, Cognitive Research, Cultural Shift, Consistency, Persistence, Motive, Logic, Psychological Outcomes, Support, Acceptance, Damaging Effects, Timeline --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/andanotherthingwithdave/message

Dr. Gigerenzer explains to me how to make better decisions under uncertainty via use of heuristics, intuition, and narratives. Dr. Gerd Gigerenzer, PhD is Director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy at the University of Potsdam, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg and partner of Simply Rational - The Institute for Decisions. He is former Director of the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition (ABC) at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and at the Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research in Munich, Professor of Psychology at the University of Chicago and John M. Olin Distinguished Visiting Professor, School of Law at the University of Virginia. Awards for his work include the AAAS Prize for the best article in the behavioral sciences, the Association of American Publishers Prize for the best book in the social and behavioral sciences, the German Psychology Award, and the Communicator Award of the German Research Foundation. His award-winning popular books Calculated Risks, Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, and Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions have been translated into 21 languages. His academic books include Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, Rationality for Mortals, Simply Rational, and Bounded Rationality (with Reinhard Selten, a Nobel Laureate in economics). In Better Doctors, Better Patients, Better Decisions (with Sir Muir Gray) he shows how better informed doctors and patients can improve healthcare while reducing costs.

What can psychology tell us about Paganism? Does science study Magic Spells and their effect? Are Pagans happier? CONNECT & SUPPORT

I was confused about "heuristics"! It is always so exciting when I learn something new that makes things clearer to me. According to Dr. Gigerenzer, heuristics are NOT the same as cognitive bias. Cognitive bias describes PAST behavior, often in situations of so-called "risk" (the economic term) (that actually means that all variables are known). Heuristics guide what can be DONE in the FUTURE and are helpful in situations of uncertainty. Dr. Gigerenzer is an international expert on judgments under uncertainty, and this is part 1 of my conversation with him on heuristics. Dr. Gerd Gigerenzer, PhD is Director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy at the University of Potsdam, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg and partner of Simply Rational - The Institute for Decisions. He is former Director of the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition (ABC) at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and at the Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research in Munich, Professor of Psychology at the University of Chicago and John M. Olin Distinguished Visiting Professor, School of Law at the University of Virginia. Awards for his work include the AAAS Prize for the best article in the behavioral sciences, the Association of American Publishers Prize for the best book in the social and behavioral sciences, the German Psychology Award, and the Communicator Award of the German Research Foundation. His award-winning popular books Calculated Risks, Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, and Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions have been translated into 21 languages. His academic books include Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, Rationality for Mortals, Simply Rational, and Bounded Rationality (with Reinhard Selten, a Nobel Laureate in economics). In Better Doctors, Better Patients, Better Decisions (with Sir Muir Gray) he shows how better informed doctors and patients can improve healthcare while reducing costs. 

This podcast reviews a paper with the title ‘Teacher, forgive me, I forgot to do it' the impact of children's prospective memory on teachers' evaluation of academic performance.  Prospective memory is, according to Einstein and McDaniel the memory for intentions. It enables us to remember to carry out an action that has been planned for a predefined time in the future, while performing a concurrent activity named ongoing task.  One of the interesting things about prospective memory is how others perceive it.  If you fail to carry out your intention it is seen as character flaw - so where you forget to hand in book you might be considered forgetful, flaky, or in terms of social skills - like remembering to wish someone happy birthday you might be thought of as indifferent.  Can this then affect teachers' perceptions of students and can this in turn inpact academic success? The link to Grace Molloy's podcast on cognitive bias is here. Reference: Basso D, Corradini G, Cottini M. "Teacher, forgive me, I forgot to do it!" The impact of children's prospective memory on teachers' evaluation of academic performance. Br J Educ Psychol. 2023 Mar;93(1):17-32. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12537. Epub 2022 Aug 7. PMID: 35934815; PMCID: PMC10087291.    

English Description (German below)Guest: Ralph HertwigRalph Hertwig explains the phenomenon of the "wisdom of the crowd". In the wisdom traditions, the individual is considered wise, the group rather a source of irrationality. Under certain circumstances, however, it may be that the combined judgment of a crowd surpasses that of any one person, no matter how wise. But this should not lead us to blindly apply the concept of the "wisdom of the crowd" to every group movement and to trust that the average of many assessments is always the best choice. After all, groups of people are not always idealized collections of subjects. In many situations they interact very strongly with each other, influence each other and are prone to panic overreactions by immitation behavior, which increase each other than to cool down wisely and soberly.You can find the German and the English transcript on our homepage: www.metis.ethz.ch. There we also provide further material on the topic. Follow our social media channels on Mastodon, Twitter and Instagram!Send us an email with questions and comments to: metis@phil.gess.ethz.ch. This podcast was produced by Martin Münnich with the support of ETH Zurich and the Udo Keller Foundation, Forum Humanum in Hamburg.German DesctiptionGast: Ralph HertwigRalph Hertwig erklärt uns das Phänomen der "wisdom of the crowd". In den Weisheitstraditionen gilt oder die Einzelperson als weise, die Gruppe eher als ein Quell von Irrationalität. Unter bestimmten Umständen kann es aber sein, dass die geballte Urteilskraft einer Menge, diejenige einer noch so klugen Person übertrifft. Doch das sollte nicht dazu verleiten, das Konzept der "wisdom of the crowd" blindlings auf jede Gruppenbewegung anzuwenden und darauf zu vertrauen, dass der Durchschnitt aus vielen Einschätzungen immer die beste Wahl ist. Menschengruppen sind ja nicht immer idealisierte Ansammlungen von Probanden. In vielen Situationen interagieren sie sehr stark miteinander, beeinflussen sich gegenseitig und sind durch Immitationsverhalten anfällig für panische Überreaktionen, die sich wechselseitig steigern, als sich weise und nüchtern runterzukühlen.Das deutsche und das englische Transkript finden Sie auf unserer Homepage: www.metis.ethz.ch. Dort stellen wir auch weiteres Material zum Thema zur Verfügung. Folgen Sie unseren Social-Media-Kanälen auf Mastodon, Twitter und Instagram!Schreiben Sie uns eine Mail mit Fragen und Kommentaren an: metis@phil.gess.ethz.ch Dieser Podcast wurde produziert von Martin Münnich mit Unterstützung der ETH Zürich und der Udo-Keller-Stiftung, Forum Humanum in Hamburg.

From the 4/5/23 Live Stream. Watch the full video here Join Courtenay & Rachel as they dive into episode 3 of Crypted History Uncrypted. Under the guise of social “science” research, we were brought, social engineering and propaganda. The ladies uncover what at first glance appears to be a field to investigate and heal ailments of the “psyche” aka the soul, and how that became weaponized against the masses and propagandized for war all while being funded by similar entities of todays MIC machine. To join the live conversation, we'll answer questions asked via our live chat link. To join, follow our chat link: https://dono.chat/dono/Courtenay ————————————————— Disclaimer: this is intended to be inspiration & entertainment. We aim to inform, inspire & empower. Guest opinions/ statements are not a reflection of the host or podcast. Please note these are conversational dialogues. All statements and opinions are not necessarily meant to be taken as fact. Please do your own research. Thanks for watching! ————————————————— Join us at Rebels for a C.A.U.S.E - June 3rd & 4th in Nashville, TN - https://www.rebelsforcause.com Follow & Connect with Courtenay: https://www.courtenayturner.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/KineticCourtz TruthSocial: https://truthsocial.com/@CourtenayTurner Instagram: https://instagram.com/kineticcourtz?utm_medium=copy_link Telegram: https://t.me/courtenayturnerpodcastcommunity Read some of her articles: https://www.truthmatters.biz Listen to &/or watch the podcast here! https://linktr.ee/courtenayturner Support my work & Affiliate links: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/courtzt https://zstacklife.com/?ref=COURTENAYTURNER FOX N SONS Coffee: https://www.foxnsons.com Promo Code: CTP The wellness company: https://www.twc.health/?ref=UY6YiLPqkwZzUX Enroll link: https://app.sharehealthcare.com/enroll? Referral code: courtz Www.HolyHydrogen.com Discount code: UPRISING144K LMNT: https://drinklmnt.com/pages/free-gift-with-purchase?rfsn=6999587.ebab27&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=courtenayturner&utm_campaign=agwp&utm_content=&utm_term=&rfsn_cn=EXCLUSIVE%20GIFT%20FOR%20COURTENAY%20TURNER%27S%20COMMUNITY Ignite Sales: https://www.universityofreason.com/a/29887/KVR3yvZo Mindset workshop: https://www.universityofreason.com/a/2147526145/KVR3yvZo Critical thinking trivium method: https://www.universityofreason.com/a/2147486641/KVR3yvZo Solutions webinar: https://www.universityofreason.com/a/2147492490/KVR3yvZo Richard's GTW freedom vault: https://www.universityofreason.com/a/2147506649/KVR3yvZo https://www.universityofreason.com/a/29887/KVR3yvZo ©2023 All Rights Reserved Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Join Leilani and Kimberlyn as they discuss the impact of Brené Brown's work—on shame, vulnerability, and allowing oneself to be seen—on their lives and their spiritual work.Get exclusive content and support us on Patreon:http://www.patreon.com/WitchyWit  Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/WitchyWitPodcast  Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/Witchy_Wit  Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/3azUkFVlECTlTZQVX5jl1X?si=8WufnXueQrugGDIYWbgc3A  Apple Podcast:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/witchy-wit/id1533482466  Pandora:https://pandora.app.link/nNsuNrSKneb  Google Podcast:Witchy Wit (google.com) 

In the first of this two-part episode with Dr. Troy Campbell, we're breaking down the principles behind storytelling and what makes something “cool.”  Campbell is the Chief Scientist at On Your Feet and his research and career has centered around the intersection of scientific minds and artistic hearts and how to create and capture original and powerful ideas and make amazing things.  Part one hits on why Nike ads are simple to make and how brands like Disney borrow stories.-----3:52    Troy's Career Thesis: “Scientific Mind & Artistic Heart”6:11    Marvel Isn't Appealing to Everyone10:19  Egocentrism 14:04  Nike Ads are Simple to Make16:58  Borrowing Stories From Others22:50  Multi-Narrative Storytelling25:46  Defining Your Story to Tell Multi-Narrative Stories31:20  The Destiny Narrative-----To learn more about Troy's research on the intersection of Scientific Mind, Artistic Heart, check out:Troy-Campbell.comStart with Science - NetflixTeam Science: Building Better Science Activists with Insights from Disney, Marketing, and Psychological Research

#MotivationalTalks #InspirationalVideos #Psychological aspectsSpeaker - BV Satya NageshMusic - https://www.bensound.comSupport: Gautham Bhavaraju & Phani Madhav KasturiMr. B.V.Satya Nagesh is a Counselling Psychologist, Hypnotist and NLP Trainer enjoying good reputation for the last 30 years in the fields of Corporate Training Programmes, Behavioral Counselling, Hypnotherapy etc.,He is author of three books on ‘Self Hypnotism', ‘ Memory' and ‘Mind Management'. His talks on topics related to Mind are telecast by all popular TV channels. His talks on various topics related to Mind Management are available on YouTube channel.https://www.youtube.com/c/BVSatyaNageshMr. Satya Nagesh is qualified in Biological Sciences, Applied Psychology, Psychological Counselling, Business Administration and Public Relations Management. He has toured and conducted Training programmes for people from all walks of life ranging from students to executives in important cities of India and abroad. Mr. Satya Nagesh is a regular visiting faculty to the following Organizations:Indian Air ForceEngineering Staff College of IndiaDefense Institute of Psychological Research, New Delhi.Bharath Dynamics Ltd., (BDL)School of Management Studies (J.N.T.U)Academic Staff College (Osmania University)Police AcademyRegional Academy of Broadcasting & Multimedia (P), Govt. Of IndiaNational Academy of Telecom and finance Management (BSNL)National Institute of Small Industrial Entrepreneurs Training (NISIET)SBI Life Insurance Co.E.D.P (Osmania University)Dr. Marri Chenna Reddy HRD Institute,Mishra Dhatu Nigham (MIDHANI)Life Insurance Corporation of India,BHEL HRD Centre,CARE Hospitals,Indian Institute of Co-Operative Management,Co-operative Training Institute, APCOB.Prashanthi Counselling and HRD Centre,Vivekananda Institute of Human Excellence, Ramakrishna Math.Vijai Electricals LtdMadhu Film InstituteReal Estate companies and some Educational Institutions,BV Satya NageshDirector, MIND FoundationCentre for Behavioral CounselingVidyanagar, Hyderabad - 500044. IndiaSubscribe for more videos : https://youtube.com/bvsatyanagesh#Memory #MindManagement #PavanKalyan #PersonalityDevelopment #Success #PersonalityDevelopment #TimeManagement #ExamFear #SkillDevelopment #NLP #CouncellingPsychologist

Joseph chats with Anne Scheel. Anne is currently a postdoc at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam but will be starting as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Methodology and Statistics at Utrecht University in mid October. Anne is a meta-scientist who is interested in which research and publication practices can improve the reproducibility of the published literature, and how researchers can be encouraged to design more falsifiable and informative studies. She did her PhD at Eindhoven University of Technology, followed by a postdoc project at VU Amsterdam and CWTS Leiden. In this episode we chat about her recent publications in which she argues that most claims in the psychology literature are so critically underspecified that attempts to empirically evaluate them are doomed to failure. She also argues that researchers should focus more on non-confirmatory research activities to obtain the inputs necessary to make hypothesis tests informative.WE NOW HAVE A SUBSTACK! Stay up to date with the pod and become part of the ever-growing community :) https://stanfordpsypod.substack.com/If you found this episode interesting at all, consider leaving us a good rating! It just takes a second but will allow us to reach more people and make them excited about psychology.LinksAnne's papers:Scheel, A. M. (2022). Why most psychological research findings are not even wrong. Infant and Child Development, 31(1), e2295Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744-755Paper on strategic ambiguity: Frankenhuis, W., Panchanathan, K., & Smaldino, P. E. (2022). Strategic ambiguity in the social sciencesAnne's Twitter @annemscheelAnne's blog 100% CIJoseph's Twitter @outa_josephPodcast Twitter @StanfordPsyPodPodcast Substack https://stanfordpsypod.substack.com/Let us know what you thought of this episode, or of the podcast! :) stanfordpsychpodcast@gmail.com

In this episode, Jonathan is speaking with Gerd Gigerenzer about how to stay smart in a smart world. They discuss: •Origins of his interest in science and why he chose psychology. •Why he chose to write his most recent book, “How to Stay Smart in a Smart World.” •How he prefers the strategy of teaching how to think versus nudging. •Artificial intelligence, it's various stages, and our current stage given our latest technology. •The stable world principle and the limitations of AI. •The recency heuristic and the concept of ecological rationality. •Viral spread of false information, deep fakes, and the need for more critical thinking. •And other topics. Dr. Gerd Gigerenzer is Director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy at the University of Potsdam, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg and partner of Simply Rational - The Institute for Decisions. He is former Director of the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and at the Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research in Munich, Professor of Psychology at the University of Chicago and John M. Olin Distinguished Visiting Professor, School of Law at the University of Virginia. You can find this episode on YouTube here: https://bit.ly/3Ptgiyb Also, don't forget about our book “Thinking Critically. From Fake News to Conspiracy Theories. Using Logic to Safely Navigate the Information Landscape” if you're interested in exploring how logic can be used to better help you to discern fact from fiction. The information landscape is perilous, but with the help of this book as your guide, you will always be able to find your way towards truth. It's available on Amazon today! Book: https://amzn.to/3nWdawV This show is supported and produced by Final Stretch Media. Final Stretch believes in creating something that disrupts attention spans and challenges the marketing status quo. They do this by creating high quality visual content that captivates your audience. You can find them on: Website: https://bit.ly/3AsP3wZ This show is also supported by QuikLee; the creators of Brain Racers. The world's first ever live racing competition for the brain. Download their app and play live on the weekends on an iOS device against the world. We have raced and it's a blast! App Download: https://apple.co/33n8aJs

Quite often the ideas of ‘risk' and of ‘uncertainty' get bandied about interchangeably, but there's a world of difference between them and it matters greatly when that distinction gets lost. That's a key message from psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer, who has created an impressive case for both understanding the distinction and then acting appropriately based on the distinction. “A situation with risk,” he tells interviewer David Edmonds in this Social Science Bites podcast, “is one where you basically know everything. More precisely, you know everything that can happen in the future … you know the consequences and you know the probabilities.” It is, as Bayesian decision theorist Jimmie Savage called it, “a small world.” As an example, Gigerenzer takes us a spin on a roulette wheel – you may lose your money on a low-probability bet, but all the possible options were known in advance. Uncertainty, on the other hand, means that all future possible events aren't known, nor are their probabilities or their consequences. Rounding back to the roulette wheel, under risk all possibilities are constrained to the ball landing on a number between 1 and 36. “Under uncertainty, 37 can happen,” he jokes. “Most situations in which we make decisions,” says Gigerenzer, “involve some sort of uncertainty.” Dealing with risk versus dealing with uncertainty requires different approaches. With risk, all you need is calculation. With uncertainty, “calculation may help you to some degree, but there is no way to calculate the optimal situation.” Humans nonetheless have tools to address uncertainty. Four he identifies are heuristics, intuition, finding people to trust, and adopting narratives to sustain you. In this podcast, he focuses on heuristics, those mental shortcuts and rules of thumb that often get a bad rap. “Social science,” he says, “should take uncertainty seriously, and heuristics seriously, and then we have a key to the real world.” When asked, Gigerenzer lauds Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky for putting “the concept of heuristics back on the table.” But he disagrees with their fast-slow thinking model that gives quick, so-called System 1 thinking less primacy than more deliberative thinking. “We have in the social sciences a kind of rhetoric that heuristics are always second best and maximizing would be always better. That's wrong. It is only true in a world of risk; it is not correct in a world of uncertainty, where by definition you can't find the best solution simply because you don't know the future.” Researchers, he concludes, should “take uncertainty seriously and ask the question, ‘In what situations do these heuristics that people use (and experts use) actually work?' and not just say, ‘They must be wrong because they are a heuristic.'” Gigerenzer is the director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy at the University of Potsdam and partner at Simply Rational – The Institute for Decisions. Before that he directed the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and at the Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research. His books include general titles like Calculated Risks, Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, and Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions, as well as academic books such as Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, Rationality for Mortals, Simply Rational, and Bounded Rationality. Awards for his work include the American Association for the Advancement of Science Prize for Behavioral Science Research for the best article in the behavioral sciences in 1991, the Association of American Publishers Prize for the best book in the social and behavioral sciences for The probabilistic revolution, the German Psychology Award, and the Communicator Award of the German Research Foundation. He was a 2014 fellow at the SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind University of California, Santa Barbara (SAGE Publishing is the parent of Social Science Space) and a fellow of the Association for Psychological Science in 2008.

This week Bee, Tiegan and Maciej, RE-STAR YRAPpers, along with researchers Sylvan and Georgia discuss their experiences of neuro-atypicalities.  This honest and vulnerable discussion demonstrates why we should never make assumptions about behaviour and always be curious about the young people in our classrooms. This is the second part of the RE-STAR podcast interview.  You can listen to the first part here.

Curious - I was too, how on earth could getting pupils to watch a baby and parent help improve mental health and wellbeing.  Alison Waterhouse has a wealth of experience as a teacher, SENCo, Psychotherapist and more.  Over the last 8 years she has developed Circles for Learning to improve wellbeing in classrooms from KS1-KS5.  It is a fascinating project and offers some real insight into everyday things that all teachers can to do support wellbeing.

During this episode, I speak with Evan Auguste, who is completing the last few months of his doctoral training. Evan's area of interest include racial health and justice disparities. Evan was the chair for the student circle board of the Association of Black Psychologists and with the Association of Haitian Physicians Abroad. He is the future of forensic psychology and his insights are invaluable. Check out his work here: https://scholars.org/scholar/evan-augustePsychology's Contributions to Anti-Blackness in the United States within Psychological Research, Criminal Justice, and Mental Health: https://psyarxiv.com/f5yk6Why the APA's apology for promoting white supremacy falls short: https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/why-apa-s-apology-promoting-white-supremacy-falls-short-ncna1284229An Intersectional-Contextual Approach to Racial Trauma Exposure Risk and Coping Among Black Youth: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12757Decarcerating Care: Community-Based Healing Alternatives and How to Build Them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxdHhYcCEc4

Welcome to the second part of my interview with Dr. Nina Silander. The conversation has transitioned to discussing some of Dr. Silander's research interests regarding ideological bias in psychology. I hope you enjoy this conversation.You can read a short excerpt of her work, here: https://div12.org/ideological-bias-in-social-sciences-and-implications-for-clinical-practice/The article we mentioned, of which she was the primary author: Silander, N. C., Geczy, B., Marks, O., & Mather, R. (2020). Implications of ideological bias in social psychology on clinical practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, e12312.1Nina's Recommended Readings: Wright, R. H., & Cummings, N. A. (2005). Destructive trends in mental health: The well-intentioned path to harm. New York, NY: RoutledgeFrisby, C., O'Donohue, W., Redding, R., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (in press). Political bias in psychology: Nature, scope, and solutions. Springer. - anticipated release: May 2022Frisby C. L., & O'Donohue, W. T. (2018). Cultural competence in applied psychology: An evaluation of current status and future directions. Springer. (especially the first ~6 chapters and that on viewpoint bias)Tarescavage, A. M. (2020). Science Wars II: The insidious influence of postmodern ideology on clinical psychology (Commentary on “Implications of ideological bias in social psychology on clinical practice”). Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 27(2). Article ID e12319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12319Tetlock, P. E. (1994). Political psychology or politicized psychology: Is the road to scientific hell paved with good moral intentions? Political Psychology, 15(3), 509–529.Some Valuable Organizations:Critical Therapy Antidote Network (CTA Network; international organization concerned with critical theory in mental health professions)International Association for Psychology and Counseling (IAPC; recommitment to objective scientific inquiry)Society for Open Inquiry in Behavioral Science (SOIBS) - to launch soon with its own journal)Heterodox Academy (Psychology division) Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism (provides alternative, pro-human approach to DEI)Braver Angels (workshops, lectures, resources for learning to effectively engage with ideologically diverse individuals)Relevant YouTube Videos:Dr Nina Silander: Ideological Bias in Psychology: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QeXbP1xDHAWhat to Know About Ideological Bias in Psychological Research & Its Clinical Implications: https://youtu.be/WPfMnwlN_4YNote: Information contained in this video is for educational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for treatment or consultation with a mental health professional or business consultant.

The implications of psychological research for the economy.

Educational technology such as apps and online resources to support learning is booming, from preschool to higher education and beyond, but how can we ensure it is well designed and effective? Part of the Psyched about Education series. New episodes released daily between 21 February 2022 - 1 March 2022. Full show notes: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news/2022/feb/psychological-research-informing-ed-tech Transcript: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/ioe120/ioe120-psyched-about-education/transcript-psychological-research-informing-ed-tech Find out about IOE120: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/ioe120

The Department of Psychology and Human Development's research on autism exemplifies a strong ethos of collaboration and co-production with research stakeholders. Colleagues discuss why this approach is so important to them and their work. Part of the Psyched about Education series. New episodes released daily between 21 February 2022 - 1 March 2022. Full show notes: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news/2022/feb/collaboration-and-co-production-psychological-research Transcript: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/ioe120/ioe120-psyched-about-education/transcript-collaboration-and-co-production-psychological-research Find out about IOE120: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/ioe120

Future Directions in Research on Racism-Related Stress and Racial-Ethnic Protective Factors for Black Youth, OC symptoms in African American young adults: The associations between racial discrimination, racial identity, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, Racism and Health: Challenges and Future Directions in Behavioral and Psychological Research, The Influence of Internalized Racism on the Relationship Between Discrimination and Anxiety, Racial Identity and Changes in Psychological Distress Using the Multidimensional Model of Racial Identity, The Associations Between Internalized Racism, Racial Identity, and Psychological Distress, Racial residential segregation and economic disparity jointly exacerbate COVID-19 fatality in large American cities, and The Clarion Call of the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Medical Education Can Mitigate Racial and Ethnic Disparities Scientific Sense ® by Gill Eapen: Prof. Enrique Neblett is a Professor of Health Behavior and Health Education at the University of Michigan School of Public Health. His research examines the link between racism and health in African American population. Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo2wiIHPM35xPawotek2IDA/join --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/scientificsense/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/scientificsense/support

Viren Swami is Professor of Social Psychology at Anglia Ruskin University and Director of the Centre for Psychological Research at Perdana University. His research is focused on body image, physical attractiveness, and mental health. He is the author of over two hundred academic papers and three books, including Attraction Explained (now in its second edition) and The Psychology of Physical Attraction. Inking of Immunity is made possible by all these humans: Chris Lynn - Executive Producer & Co-host Becci Owens - Associate Producer & Co-host Mike Smetana - Associate Producer & Co-host Kira Yancey - Production Manager Find us on social media on Facebook (inking.of.immunity), Twitter (@inking_immunity), and Instagram (@inking.of.immunity)

We'd love to hear from you (feedback@breakingbadscience.com)Look us up on social media Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/385282925919540Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/breakingbadsciencepodcast/Website: http://www.breakingbadscience.com/Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/breakingbadscienceTurns out looking into information that centers around the brain is a complete nightmare. Even for a biology focused person like me. When considering meditation it's unsurprising that this is the path we were led down. So what did we find? What is the truth about meditation and the brain and how deep does the research go? Join hosts Shanti and Danny as we explore meditation and how it affects the brain. ReferencesWalsh, R., Shapiro, S.; The Meeting of Meditative Disciplines and Western Psychology. American Psychologist. Apr-2006. 61:3 (227 - 239). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0003-066X.61.3.227Goyal, M., et. al.; Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 01-Mar-2015. 174:3 (357 - 368). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13018Konjedi, S., Maleeh, R.; Sleep and Mindfulness Meditation as They Relate to False Memory. Psychological Research. 22-Sep-2018. 84 (1084 - 1111). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1098-0Lutterveld, R., et. al.; Meditation is Associated with Increased Brain Network Integration. Neuroimage. 01-Sep-2018.158 (18 - 25). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.071Pokorski, M., Suchorzynske, A.; Psychobehavioral Effects of Meditation. Pulmonary Disorders and Therapy. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 25-Jun-2017.  1023. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2017_52Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/breakingbadscience?fan_landing=true)

Feeling stuck or noticing others getting in their own way? Learn how SuperInfluencers use the transformative Need-Forward skill to create positivity and progress for themselves and others.Our guest Grace Pfisterer is also a Leadership Coach and works with clients to explore the outcomes they most deeply desire, identify what's getting in the way, and drive intentional action to make those outcomes a reality. She's currently pursuing her coaching certification through Co-Active Training Institute. Wanna dig a little deeper? Check out the research referenced in this episode:Sigal, Barsad C., et al. "Emotional contagion in organizational life." Research in Organizational Behavior 38: (2018) pp.137-151Chermahini, Soghra Akbari & Hommel, Bernhard. "Creative Mood Swings: Divergent and Convergent Thinking Affect Mood in Opposite Ways" Psychological Research 76 (5): pp 634-40 

Ever wonder what you would appreciate most from a relationship - whether that's spending time with your loved ones or having your partner make you a coffee in the morning? Love languages explore how you feel most loved and what that means for others. Join as we breakdown the topic and see what research has to say about love languages. Let's dive in! Resources Used: Bunt, S., & Hazelwood, Z. J. (2017). Walking the walk, talking the talk: Love languages, self‐regulation, and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 280-290. Cook, M., Pasley, J., Pellarin, E., Medow, K., Baltz, M., & Buhman-Wiggs, A. (2013). Construct validation of the five love languages. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 18(2), 50-61. Egbert, N., & Polk, D. (2006). Speaking the language of relational maintenance: A validity test of Chapman's Five Love Languages. Communication Research Reports, 23(1), 19-26. Hughes, J. L., & Camden, A. A. (2020). Using Chapman's Five Love Languages Theory to Predict Love and Relationship Satisfaction. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 25.

Welcome to Bare Mixup w. Danii and Rae! On our 45th episode we talk about respectability politics and societal standards specifically placed on black women. We discuss the things we were told we should and should not do and what it means to have agency over our bodies as black women. Song of the week: Tragic- Jazmine Sullivan BARE MIXUP & CHILL PLAYLIST: open.spotify.com/playlist/6u3Qnn0…VITaKC2Nbg3eyl0g BARE MIXUP CHUNES PLAYLIST: open.spotify.com/playlist/5amJ6tV…ZRTKOOV_-uhfYxPQ Black Owned Business: BARE MIXUP SUMMER MERCH!!! teespring.com/stores/bare-mix-up-buy Mental Notes Source: -“The Missing Link”: The Exclusion of Black Women in Psychological Research and the Implications for Black Women's Mental Health by Kamesha Spates (2012) -Therapy resources: - www.blacktherapistlist.com/ - affirmnetwork.com/ -providers.therapyforblackgirls.com/ -FREE THERAPY For Canadians: myicbt.com/home Instagram: @baremixuppod Email: baremixuppod@gmail.com Intro Music by: @chiefvillo Cover Artwork by: @byroux_ Audio Editing: @daniellacreme_

Tune in to hear:- On a previous podcast, Richard Nisbett expressed that the most central message of psychology is that we have no access to most of what goes on in our heads. What studies are illustrative of this dramatic conclusion he reached?- What are the implications of this stream of thought, particularly in regards to free will and determinism?- In light of this research, are things like introspection valuable or do they simply feel meaningful?- If environment is highly influential in our decision making process, what can we do to create environmental prompts to improve the decisions we make?- How can incentives for driving behavior backfire and why might consensus be a more powerful motivational tool?- How can we consider all sides, to more effectively protect ourselves from confirmation bias, in an age when it's so easy for really harmful, unvetted ideas to get propagated and shared widely.- What's a practical example of how one can use formal logic to improve decisions?Web: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00SSAXRCW/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i1Compliance Code: 1863-OAS-6/18/2021

Is psychology research in a crisis or a renaissance? Over the past decade, scientists have realized that many published research results, including some classic findings in psychology, don't always hold up to repeat trials. Brian Nosek, PhD, of the Center for Open Science, discusses how psychologists are leading a movement to address that problem, in psychology and in other scientific fields, by changing the way that research studies get funded, conducted and published. Listener Survey - https://www.apa.org/podcastsurvey

“Happiness comes from trying to make others feel good rather than yourself.” Do you agree with that statement?

Our nation is increasingly becoming divided into opposing groups. And these divisions are becoming more and more entrenched. So, why is this occurring? This episode is also available as a blog post: https://lovelifeprof.com/2020/01/19/why-are-we-so-divided-and-what-can-we-do-about-it-psychological-research-has-some-clues/ and follow me on all social media @LoveLifeProf Find my book, Love Demystified: Strategies for a Successful Love Life https://amzn.to/398rk93 and my workbook Questionnaires to Assess Your Love Life at https://amzn.to/2lQT2BT

This is Episode 23 of PsychCrunch, the podcast from the British Psychological Society’s Research Digest. In this episode, Emily Reynolds, staff writer at Research Digest, explores modern psychology’s relationship with race and representation. It’s well-known that psychology has a generalisability problem, with studies overwhelmingly using so-called “WEIRD” participants: those who are Western and educated and from industrialised, rich and democratic societies. But how does that shape the assumptions we make about participants of different racial identities or cultures? And how can top-tier psychology journals improve diversity among not only participants but also authors and editors? Our guests, in order of appearance, are Dr Bobby Cheon, Assistant Professor at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, and Dr Steven O. Roberts, Assistant Professor of Psychology at Stanford University. Episode credits: Presented and produced by Emily Reynolds. Script edits by Matthew Warren. Mixing and editing by Jeff Knowler. PsychCrunch theme music by Catherine Loveday and Jeff Knowler. Art work by Tim Grimshaw. Research mentioned in this episode includes: How USA-Centric Is Psychology? An Archival Study of Implicit Assumptions of Generalizability of Findings to Human Nature Based on Origins of Study Samples Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population

James Kirby, Ph.D., is a researcher and senior lecturer at the University of Queensland in Australia, who studies the effects of kindness and compassion. Jeff Kim, a graduate student under Dr. Kirby, joins my discussion with Dr. Kirby on measuring and incorporating physiological data into their research. Today’s conversation is focused on measuring heart rate variability. Like many of us, Dr. Kirby didn’t take any psychology courses that incorporated physiology when he was in school. But when he became acquainted with the work of Stephen Porges, Julian Thayer and others, he was compelled to learn more. Eventually, collecting and analyzing physiological data became part of Dr. Kirby’s research on compassion. He’s quick to say he couldn’t have gotten where he is on his own. For others wanting to do something similar, he highly recommends connecting and collaborating with others who are already in the space. Being able to work alongside someone else and to be shown the ropes – preferably in person – makes for a smoother integration and a much quicker learning curve. Jeff Kim shares details regarding equipment and software they use, some of his findings, and best practice recommendations. In this episode, you’ll learn… About the influences on Dr. Kirby’s interests and developments How Dr. Kirby gained access to needed equipment About the equipment and software they use Why there is no substitute for meeting with other researchers in person About the most challenging parts of incorporating physiological data in research Tips from the episode On how to integrate physiological measurements in your work… Partner with others who are already in the space and who (hopefully) have the means to collect, analyze, and interpret data Attend workshops Meet, learn from, and collaborate with others in the space On staying abreast of the latest research in the space… Twitter has become Dr. Kirby’s “academic library” Follow those who study areas you’re interested in but don’t know much about Watch academic talks on YouTube and take notes Links from the episode: Dr. James Kirby’s profile at the University of Queensland Stephen Porges’ work on polyvagal theory Paul Gilbert – compassion-focused therapy Professor Julian Thayer and the vagus nerve Center for Compassion and Altruism Research Dr. James Doty and Dr. Emma Seppala, Handbook of Compassion Science Dr. Stacey Parker June Gruber Tor Wager Research Matters Podcast is hosted by Jason Luoma, who can be found on Twitter @jasonluoma or Facebook at: facebook.com/jasonluomaphd. You download the podcast through iTunes, Stitcher, or Spotify. Reach out with suggestions, questions, or comments to researchmatterspod@gmail.com

This episode focuses on the research methodology used in psychology, and a walk through of the experimental method, with a splash of ethics. This was the audio portion of a narrated PowerPoint video based on the psychology 2e textbook from openstax.org. Psychology Concepts Explained YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVN6Ssi9GE8NeTCbjeky01g. Textbook: https://openstax.org/details/books/psychology-2e Content Index: Experiments and causality Designing an experiment Blind, double blind, placebo Independent and Dependent Variables Selecting participants Random Assignment ethics Interpreting Results Reliability and Validity Ethics Thanks again for listening! Visit my podcast home page! https://drjackchuang.wordpress.com/ Find me via email: PsychExplained@pm.me, or via Twitter, @JACKBTEACHING (I know, that's clever, right?) Anonymous suggestion box: https://pht4g6i9gwi.typeform.com/to/UIfqLwxP Ways to Support my podcast: Please rate and comment on Apple Podcasts or your podcast app. Use Anchor link below for monthly support, or a single donation using PayPal to my username, @JACKYAC Or via my PayPal profile page: https://paypal.me/jackyac?locale.x=en_US All support received goes towards keeping Dr. Chuang caffeinated, and the coffee purchased will be from local, small roasters and coffee shops - so your support will help local small businesses! Coffee shops I have supported: https://brewsandrescuescoffee.com https://www.blackcoffeefw.com/products https://ascensiondallas.com/shop/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/jackbteaching/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/jackbteaching/support

This episode focuses on the research methodology used in psychology, and a walk through of several descriptive methods. This was the audio portion of a narrated PowerPoint video based on the psychology 2e textbook from openstax.org. Psychology Concepts Explained YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVN6Ssi9GE8NeTCbjeky01g. Textbook: https://openstax.org/details/books/psychology-2e Content Index: Why is research important? Thinking critically/scientifically Inductive v. deductive reasoning Scientific Method, theory v. hypothesis Approaches to research case studies observation Surveys archival research longitudinal and cross sectional research correlational research correlation does not mean causation Illusory Correlation & confirmation bias Thanks again for listening! Visit my podcast home page! https://drjackchuang.wordpress.com/ Find me via email: PsychExplained@pm.me, or via Twitter, @JACKBTEACHING (I know, that's clever, right?) Anonymous suggestion box: https://pht4g6i9gwi.typeform.com/to/UIfqLwxP Ways to Support my podcast: Please rate and comment on Apple Podcasts or your podcast app. Use Anchor link below for monthly support, or a single donation using PayPal to my username, @JACKYAC Or via my PayPal profile page: https://paypal.me/jackyac?locale.x=en_US All support received goes towards keeping Dr. Chuang caffeinated, and the coffee purchased will be from local, small roasters and coffee shops - so your support will help local small businesses! Coffee shops I have supported:
 https://brewsandrescuescoffee.com
 https://www.blackcoffeefw.com/products
 https://ascensiondallas.com/shop/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/jackbteaching/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/jackbteaching/support

Today it’s great to have Geoffrey Miller on the podcast. Geoffrey Miller is the author of Virtue Signaling (2019), Spent (2009), and The Mating Mind (2001), the co-author of Mate/What Women Want (2015), and the co-editor of Mating Intelligence (2007). He has a B.A. from Columbia and a Ph.D. from Stanford. He's a tenured evolutionary psychology professor at the University of New Mexico; and has also worked at the University of Sussex, the Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, University College London, London School of Economics, U.C.L.A., and NYU Stern Business School. He researches evolutionary psychology, sexuality, consumer behavior, behavior genetics, intelligence, personality, creativity, humor, and mental disorders. He's has over 110 academic publications, and has given over 200 invited talks in 16 countries. His research has been featured in Nature, Science, Time, Wired, New Scientist, The Economist,The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Psychology Today, on NPR and BBC radio, and on CNN, PBS, Discovery Channel, Learning Channel, National Geographic Channel, BBC, and Channel 4. Time Stamps [0:35] Dr. Miller’s background and his book, The Mating Mind [2:53] Understanding Signaling Theory [6:10] Connecting Signaling Theory to sexual selection [10:41] Common misconceptions about Signaling Theory [12:41] Functions and social benefits of signaling [14:01] Creativity as signals [15:39] Dr. Miller shares about cognitive emotions [17:42] How social media helps intellectual curiosity [20:34] Connection between social rewards and sexual selection [23:06] How self-esteem tracks perception of social value [27:56] How Machiavellianism and sociopathy create a “trap” of finding followers [29:30] “Pick up artists” and their life hacks on courtship and dating [33:06] Effective influencing and courtship vs. Machiavellianism [35:18] Human beings as “ideological animals” [39:06] How individual differences create beliefs, ideologies, and values [43:07] Distinguishing cheap talk and virtue signaling [47:07] Differences between empathy and effective altruism [49:29] Cognitive biases and utilitarian thinking [54:09] Effective altruism vs. psychopathy [57:03] Discrimination of neurodivergent people [1:02:45] Impact of gifted people on society moving forward [1:04:49] Dr. Miller on teaching a course on polyamory and open sexuality [1:07:11] Pair bonding and monogamy in human evolution [1:11:49] How monogamous and polyamorous people can learn from each other [1:12:43] So what is polyamory? [1:14:30] Dr. Miller on writing a new book about ethical polyamory [1:16:20] Existential and extraterrestrial threats from an effective altruist perspective    

Help the podcast: https://www.mytherabox.com/?rfsn=3819396.014c008 https://www.patreon.com/spookypsychology Support Angel's Business : Instagram kingizzart Welcome to Spooky Psychology with Megan & Lauren. In this episode we will be discussing conspiracy theories. Sources: lithub.com, A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs- Goreis and voracek 2019, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/dunning-kruger-effect, What is confirmation bias? Psychology today, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0963721417718261 Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, and Aleksandra Cichocka, Psychology today- true false believers, https://www.livescience.com/24310-flat-earth-belief.html, Behind the curve documentary, Npr - the indicator from planet money Business insider

When it comes to winning gold medals, we know the mental game is as important as the physical. Many research hours have been poured into understanding the psychology behind athletic performance, but the research findings may reach further than elite sport.In this episode, David and Associate Professor Gucciardi discuss the concepts of mental toughness and resilience, and how they may apply not only to sports stars, but also the workplace and even the battlefield.Associate Professor Gucciardi is currently involved in several projects spanning topics such as doping in sport, mental toughness, life skills development, resilience, workplace well-being and stress.What is mental toughness? (2:17)The difference between mental toughness and resilience (3:23)Mental toughness in sport (5:45)Mental toughness and stress at work (7:49)Improving performance in the workplace (9:55)Creating the right environment for resilience (13:19)Changing culture to foster mental toughness (16:59)Future research on resilience in the army (18:25)Learn more Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical workStrengthening resilience in military officer cadets: a group-randomised controlled trial of coping and emotional regulatory self-reflection trainingA qualitative exploration of mentally tough behaviour in Australian footballCommentary: Mental toughness and individual differences in learning, education and work performance, psychological wellbeing and personality: a systematic reviewWhat is high performance? Got any questions or suggestions for future topics?Email thefutureof@curtin.edu.au.Curtin University supports academic freedom of speech. The views expressed in The Future Of podcast may not reflect those of the university.Music: OKAY by 13ounce Creative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported — CC BY-SA 3.0 Music promoted by Audio LibraryYou can read the full transcript of the episode here.

Learn about whether binaural beats are worth the hype; how Australian dingos evolved from domesticated animals; and how to navigate some unexpected consequences of talking about historical injustices. Are binaural beats worth the hype? by Andrea Michelson Binaural beats synchronize brain activity, don’t affect mood. (2020). EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-02/sfn-bbs021120.php   ‌Smith, L. (2019, September 30). What are binaural beats, and how do they work? Medicalnewstoday.Com; Medical News Today. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320019   Perez, H. D. O., Dumas, G., & Lehmann, A. (2020). Binaural beats through the auditory pathway: from brainstem to connectivity patterns. Eneuro, ENEURO.0232-19.2020. https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0232-19.2020   ‌López-Caballero, F., & Escera, C. (2017). Binaural Beat: A Failure to Enhance EEG Power and Emotional Arousal. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00557  Garcia-Argibay, M., Santed, M. A., & Reales, J. M. (2017). Binaural auditory beats affect long-term memory. Psychological Research, 83(6), 1124–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0959-2   Dingos descended from domesticated dogs by Cameron Duke Handwerk, B. (2018, August 15). How Accurate Is Alpha's Theory of Dog Domestication? https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-wolves-really-became-dogs-180970014/  Smith, B. (2015). The Dingo Debate: Origins, Behaviour and Conservation. Csiro Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=j6omCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Smith,+B.+(2015).+dingo+debate+-+origins,+behaviour+and+conservation.+Csiro+Publishing.&ots=3_mq6lMji_&sig=mZZsGU__kGJWWujADYBBwmemUA4#v=onepage&q=land%20bridge&f=false  KTH Royal Institute of Technology (2020, February 11). They were once domestic pets, then natural selection made dingoes wild. https://phys.org/news/2020-02-domestic-pets-natural-dingoes-wild.html  Zhang, S.-J., Wang, G.-D., Ma, P., Zhang, L.-L., Yin, T.-T., Liu, Y.-H., … Zhang, Y.-P. (2020). Genomic regions under selection in the feralization of the dingoes. Nature Communications, 11(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14515-6   Arendt, M., Cairns, K. M., Ballard, J. W. O., Savolainen, P., & Axelsson, E. (2016). Diet adaptation in dog reflects spread of prehistoric agriculture. Heredity, 117(5), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2016.48   Bringing up historical injustices makes majority groups defensive, but there's a way around it  by Kelsey Donk Bringing Up Past Injustices Make Majority Groups Defensive. (2020, February 5). Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/02/research-bringing-up-past-injustices-make-majority-groups-defensive   Social identity theory | Definition, History, & Facts | Britannica. (2020). In Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/social-identity-theory   Hideg, I., & Wilson, A. E. (2020). History backfires: Reminders of past injustices against women undermine support for workplace policies promoting women. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.10.001   Subscribe to Curiosity Daily to learn something new every day with Cody Gough and Ashley Hamer. You can also listen to our podcast as part of your Alexa Flash Briefing; Amazon smart speakers users, click/tap “enable” here: https://curiosity.im/podcast-flash-briefing

Live classroom recording - Gettysburg Campus HACC - Fall 2019 - full lecture recording. Live classroom recording - Gettysburg Campus HACC - Fall 2019 - full lecture recording.

First impressions can have lasting consequences.

First impressions can have lasting consequences. New research is delving into how we evaluate a stranger’s face, and pass judgments based on fleeting impressions. A new, worldwide collaborative started at Ashland University is helping explain that process, and tackle other questions. In this week’s Exploradio, WKSU’s Jeff St.Clair looks at how the Psychological Science Accelerator is putting a new face on how science is done.

Steve Discont can found on twitter at @bearlynormal, and Porter Green at @DagmarRugosa. You can go to the following URLs or research articles to learn about some of the topics discussed in this episode: Types of Escapism: Hagstrõm, D., & Kaldo, V. (2014). Escapism among players of MMORPGs – conceptual clarification, its relation to mental health factors, and development of a new measure. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0222 Actual–ideal self in gaming: Li, D., Liau, A., & Khoo, A. (2011). Examining the influence of actual-ideal self-discrepancies, depression, and escapism, on pathological gaming among massively multiplayer online adolescent gamers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(9), 535-539. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0463 Actual–ideal self-discrepancy: Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. Avatar creation: Wang, I., Rouse, S.V., & Mancuso, E.K. (2017) The virtual self: Avatar and individual determinants of mood. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 22(1), 29-38. Mental practice: Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 481-492. Wikipedia page on Reinforcement (with sections on punishment) “What is Exposure Therapy?” by the American Psychological Association Magpie Games’s Bluebeard’s Bride, Pasión de las Pasiones, and Cartel. Edgar Clément & Miguel Angel Espinoza’s Nahual

https://accadandkoka.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Brian-Nosek-e1542826437859.jpeg ()Brian Nosek, PhD In 550 BC, the Greek philosopher Heraclitus famously declared: “No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man.”  In this episode, we learn from our guest whether scientists can step into the same data pool and obtain the same research results twice. Brian Nosek is Professor of Psychology at the University of Virginia.  He is also the co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science, an organization dedicated to fostering transparency and collaboration in scientific research. In 2015, Professor Nosek and his team published in the journal Science a widely acclaimed and widely discussed paper that shed light on the extent to which psychological research findings may not be reproducible when the research is conducted anew. More recently, his Center conducted a unique project where a single data set was sent to be analyzed by about 30 independent teams of statisticians for the purpose of answering a single question.  The variability in the methods chosen and in the answers obtained was also perhaps sobering, if not perplexing. GUEST: Brian Nosek, PhD.  https://cos.io/about/team/brian-nosek-co-founder-and-executive-director/ (Profile) and https://twitter.com/BrianNosek?lang=en (Twitter) LINKS: Silberzahn R, Uhlmann EL, Martin DP et al. Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results. (2018, Advances in Methods and Science in Psychological Research, open access pre-print https://psyarxiv.com/qkwst/ (here)) Klein RA, Vianello M, Hasselman F, et al.  Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Sample and Setting. (2018, open access pre-print https://psyarxiv.com/9654g (here)) Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. (2015 in Science, open access https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281286234_Estimating_the_Reproducibility_of_Psychological_Science (here)) WATCH ON YOUTUBE: There is no video available for this episode. Support this podcast

Connect with me on social media: FB https://www.facebook.com/patrickbradleynohope/ Twitter https://twitter.com/patrickjbradley Gab https://gab.ai/whistlinginthedark --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Intro - Isn't love important 2. I released a new song - https://soundcloud.com/patlarue/one-wind-1 3. Libertarianism is deterministic - It allows for predictable rules. 4. Hip-hop - I always feel like I have to reach to find meaning. 5. My song is FILLED with depth and meaning. And it's cool. 6. It's hard to put honesty and depth in music and still have it "cool." 7. Friend: "Do you believe Alex Jones?" Me: "I dunno, sometimes." 8. What is the core of this podcast? Honesty analysis of the media. 9. Freeman beyond the wall with Richard Grove was interesting https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/free-man-beyond-the-wall/id1263295815?mt=2&i=1000424897696 10. Replication crisis in psychological research and my experience publishing in the journal of computational neuroscience. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/psychologys-replication-crisis-real/576223/ 11. Why do some people not "get" libertarianism and the non-aggression principle? 12. My experience with overcoming anxiety and depression without medication. 13. I think I'm good at analyzing information, I try to explain how I do it. 14. The problem we need to solve to "fix society" is the same problem we have when trying to explain to a single person the NAP. 15. There isn't really any extra laws needed after the NAP 16. All the genders and sexes are compatible with the NAP! 17. Abortion is a gray area for the NAP. 18. Forcing people to perform services is a violation of the NAP. Even for doctors. 19. Outro - One Wind https://soundcloud.com/patlarue/one-wind-1

In this week's episode John talks to Prof. John Horgan a Distinguished University Professor at the Global Studies Institute and Department of Psychology at Georgia State University. He has a PhD in applied psychology, and his research focuses on understanding psychological qualities of the pathways into, through, and out of terrorist behavior. His work is widely published, with books including The Psychology of Terrorism (published in over a dozen languages worldwide), Divided We Stand: The Strategy and Psychology of Ireland’s Dissident Terrorists; Walking Away from Terrorism, Leaving Terrorism Behind, and Terrorism Studies: A Reader. In 2017 he became Editor of the journal Terrorism and Political Violence and serves on the Editorial Boards of several further journals, including Legal and Criminological Psychology, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism and Journal of Strategic Security. He is a member of the Research Working Group of the FBI’s National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime. He has held positions at the University of Massachusetts (Lowell), Penn State and the University of St. Andrews, UK. Professor Horgan’s research has been featured in such venues as The New York Times, Foreign Affairs, Vice News, CNN, Rolling Stone Magazine, Nature, Scientific American and the Chronicle of Higher Education. Research that has influenced John's career Max Taylor (1988). The Terrorist. Paul Wilkinson and Alastair .M. Stewart (Eds.) (1987). Contemporary Research on Terrorism. Joby Warrick (2015). Black Flags: The Rise of ISIS. Some of John's key research Psychology and Terrorism: Introduction tothe Special Issue. American Psychologist. (2017) From Profiles to Pathways and Roots to Routes: Perspectives from Psychology on Radicalization into Terrorism. (2008) Interviewing the Terrorists: Reflectionson Fieldwork and Implications for Psychological Research (2012)

In this interesting conversation, Josie and I discuss why dieting is absolutely not the answer, how visualization can help you reach your goals and how to approach eating in children. Enjoy! Find Josie at: www.JosieSpinardi.com Josie Spinardi has helped over two hundred thousand people worldwide successfully stop binge eating, overeating and make peace with food. Combining her background in Psychological Research with her unique analytical adroitness, Josie has pioneered a new approach to behavioral change that eliminates undesirable habits, like binge eating, emotional eating, and overeating—without deprivation or willpower. As Senior Database Architect for Oracle's largest US Decision Support Database, Josie not only garnered praise from Harvard Business School for her outside of the box solution-focused innovations, she acquired the analytical framework to eradicate problems, like binge eating, with a radically different approach. And by different, we mean better. Women around the world are drawn to Josie's profound actionable insights delivered with her warm engaging wit. When people and therapists alike have a problem with binge eating, emotional eating or overeating they can't solve, they call Josie Spinardi because she delivers. Josie's clients include therapists, medical professionals, business professionals, homemakers, students, singers and songwriters, and even a Hollywood television actress or two. Josie's books have helped women stop binge eating, emotional eating and overeating, master their relationship with food, and get thin in over twenty countries. Please check out Rocket Surgeons at: www.Facebook.com/RocketSurgeonsMusic www.RocketSurgeonsBand.com  Find me at: www.Facebook.com/VeggieFitKids www.Veggiefitkids.com Email me at: VeggieDoctor@veggiefitkids.com Remember to share this podcast, rate and review! Have a plantastic day!  

In this fifth episode of the bodymindself™ podcast psychologist and cognitive scientist John Francis Leader (JFL) meets Professor J. Scott Jordan to discuss the topics of self and volition, or conscious will. J. Scott Jordan’s research focuses on volition and its relationship to consciousness. He received his PhD in cognitive psychology and the neurophysiological basis of perception at Northern Illinois University in Dekalb, Illinois in 1991. His dissertation addressed the relationship between voluntary eye-movements and spatial perception. In 1992 he was awarded an Alexander von Humboldt Post-doctoral Fellowship and spent a year in Prof. Dr. Hans Kornhuber’s neurophysiology lab at the University of Ulm in Germany studying the relationship between event-related brain potentials and memory and attention. In 1998-1999 he spent a year at the Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research in Munich, Germany studying the relationship between action planning and spatial perception, and in 2006, spent a semester as a Scholar-in-Residence at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research at the University of Bielefeld in Germany working in a research group entitled, “Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines.” He is currently the Chair of the Department of Psychology at Illinois State University in Normal, Illinois where he is also Director of the Institute for Prospective Cognition (http://my.ilstu.edu/~jsjorda/Institute_for_Prospective_Cognition.html), which he founded in 2008. His empirical research continues to focus on the relationship between spatial perception and action planning, with an increasing emphasis on social influences. He also investigates social perception during interaction and the manner in which these social dynamics influence perceived similarity, use of stereotypes, and desire to reengage. His theoretical work (i.e., Wild Systems Theory) focuses on moving scientific psychology away from the current computational-ecological debate, toward an integrated framework that conceptualises organisms as embodiments of the phylogenetic, cultural, social, and developmental contexts from they emerged and in which they sustain themselves. The bodymindself™ podcast, newly launched in 2017, is an ongoing series of conversations between JFL and others on the topics of applied psychology and cognitive science, experiential learning, perception, virtual and mixed reality, embodiment, mental processes and identification. The aim of the series is to include the voices of people from very diverse backgrounds, ranging from academia to those working on the frontline in applied fields, with the hope of gaining an even greater systematic understanding of the topics being explored. All references and views expressed are those of the person who expressed them and not necessarily those of JFL. Your comments, shares, likes and dislikes are very welcome and will help guide future discussions. To stay up to date follow on twitter.com/jfldotcom, subscribe on @jfldotcom or itun.es/i67P795 and visit jfl.com . References Full references for the episode and other information can be found at: https://jfl.com/blog/self-volition-j-scott-jordan-jfl-bodymindself-podcast/

Despite efforts aimed at gender equality in positions of power, women are underrepresented in most high-level positions in organizations. Recent data suggests that less than 5% of Fortune 500 CEOs are women, less than 15% of executive officers, and less than 20% of full professors in the natural sciences. In this seminar, Francesca Gino discusses recent research that sheds light on the question of why women are underrepresented in top leadership positions. She explores work that shows that men and women view professional advancement differently, and their views affect their interest and decisions to climb the organizational ladder. Francesca presents cross-cultural data that speaks to this issue. Additionally, she explores work from a second study that demonstrates that men and women have different preferences when it comes to the future. Francesca Gino, Tandon Family Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School   

Zoe de Toledo shares her extraordinary experiences of coxing at the highest levels, and her love of studying at Oxford in this podcast. She describes her part in the thrilling race that led to the GB women’s eight coming second in last year’s Olympics in Rio. The Olympian was also the cox during the dramatic Boat Race of 2012, when a swimmer disrupted the contest between Oxford and Cambridge on the Tideway. De Toledo continues by talking about Oxford’s academic strengths and why she continues to study here. She is now reading Medicine at Harris Manchester College – her third degree at Oxford. She previously completed Master’s degrees in Psychological Research, and Criminology and Criminal Justice when she studied at St Catherine’s College.

Jesse and Brittany discuss their champagne filled Golden Globe viewing party, listener voice mails and emails, Pew Research Center's latest on the 115th Congress, Gallup's latest on American confidence in Donald Trump's ability, psychological research on conservative and liberal openness to opposing political views, Donald Trump's continued feud with the CIA, Donald Trump's reversal on... The post #267 – “Golden Globes 2017, Pew Research, Gallup, & Psychological Research Update, Donald Trump vs. CIA, Wall Reversal, Macy's Job Loses and Variation in Coverage, and A$$hole of Today feat. Martin Shkreli.” appeared first on I Doubt It Podcast.

A Dutch statistician recently became suspicious by headlines in the Dutch news that women were being discriminated against when it came to getting science research funding. Professor Casper Albers of the Heymans Institute for Psychological Research, Groningen, discovered that the study into the funding process showed that when you looked at the overall numbers of successful candidates, women seemed to be less successful than men. And yet, when you looked at a breakdown of the different subjects people could apply for, it showed that women were not losing out disproportionately to men. How could two opposite findings be true? This contradiction is explained by a famous statistical paradox. We explain what is known as Simpson's Paradox with the aid of a choir metaphor, performed by the BBC Singers.

In this talk, Prof. Klassen, University of York, considers how psychological research can inform how teachers are selected for training and practice, leading to new selection approaches that can strengthen the quality of schools in the UK and elsewhere.

Kirk Sange from Stange Law Firm talked about recent psychological research showing that shared parenting is preferred. This is based on an article on familylawheadquarters.com.  Stange Law Firm, PC is a family law firm in Missouri and Illinois in the St. Louis Metro Area. With offices in St. Louis, St. Charles, Jefferson County (Arnold), Franklin County (Union) in Missouri and St. Clair County (Belleville) and Madison County (Edwardsville) in Illinois, you can call Stange Law Firm at 314-963-4700 or by contacting us at St. Louis Child Custody Lawyers. 

BDSM, SWINGING & POWER PLAY! Psych grad student & researcher Ryan Witherspoon stimulates our ears with kinky knowledge! TOPICS: Swingers vs Polyamory, Psychological Research, Healthy Kink, Pain vs Sensation, Stress-Reduction, Power Play, Service Tops, BDSM vs Abuse, Control, Trust & Pride, Surprising Research, Male Submissives, Pre-Play Negotiations, Boosting Self-Esteem, Open Conversation, Fidelity, Abundance vs Scarcity and Mindful Jealousy! Ryan Witherspoon has published peer-reviewed research and regularly presents at academic conferences nationwide on the topics of sexual minorities and alternative lifestyles, as well as school bullying and mindfulness-based practices.  Ryan will receive his Master's degree in psychology from Pepperdine University in April, enroute to earning his Ph.D.  Additionally Ryan is a state-certified sexual assault advocate and co-founder of Psychotherapists for Sexual Diversity (PSD), a Los Angeles-based professional organization for clinicians and graduate students interested in sexual diversity issues.  For more information about PSD or Ryan's research work, please email him at RyanWitherspoon@gmail.com.

Everyone has felt the frustration of making what we think is the perfect argument, the most brilliant strategy, or surefire new creative direction, just to be met with stony silence, dubiousness, or outright opposition. Dr Kenneth G. Brown presents this informative and engaging session teaching us how to use human nature to our advantage, understanding how to influence people though our words and actions. Fundamental psychological research and its application to influence will be discussed.

I don’t know about you, but I constantly find myself answering questions about EFT and tapping. It is great that we can draw from on personal experience (and the experience of those with whom we work) when sharing about tapping, but in many cases this is not enough. It is useful to have structured, peer-reviewed scientific studies to build the wall of proof that so many are looking for. To that end I have something in two parts that will help you respond to people who are looking for scientific proof about tapping and EFT. First, I have an interview with Dawson Church, PhD about completed research studies, on-going research studies, and planned research studies. Second, I have a summary of many of the recent studies to make it easier for you to talk about them.

Stephen W. Porges, PhD, is a professor of psychiatry and the director of the Brain-Body Center at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He is a former president of the Society for Psychological Research and also the Federation of Behavioral, Psychological, and Cognitive Sciences.  He is a former recipient of a National Institute of Mental […]

Psychology is not a simple subject. This unit examines how different aspects of human behaviour provide the focus for different psychologists. Using learning as an example, you will discover how many different approaches can be adopted thus illustrating that there is no single way of answering psychological questions. This study unit is just one of many that can be found on LearningSpace, part of OpenLearn, a collection of open educational resources from The Open University. Published in ePub 2.0.1 format, some feature such as audio, video and linked PDF are not supported by all ePub readers.

Professor Margaret Wetherell discusses her pioneering research into the language of racism.

Transcript -- Professor Margaret Wetherell discusses her pioneering research into the language of racism.

Professor Margaret Wetherell discusses her pioneering research into the language of racism.

Transcript -- Professor Margaret Wetherell discusses her pioneering research into the language of racism.

Peter Simpson, president of Segmedica Inc, defines the three types of physicians his organization has identified after years of psychological research.