Podcasts about Superposition

The Future of Survival: The Quantum Survival Plan Episode Description What happens when encryption fails and every digital lock—your money, your identity, your security—can be picked in seconds? In this episode, we explore the rise of quantum computing, what it means for your future, and how to build a prepper plan for a post-encryption world. From offline backups to analog skills and financial fallback systems, we help you survive the digital collapse before it arrives. Episode Breakdown

In this episode of The Effortless Podcast, host Amit Prakash sits down with Professor Debdeep Jena, a leading expert in semiconductors, superconductors, and quantum devices at Cornell University. They explore the fascinating world of quantum computing, from its early 20th-century origins to its transformative potential in modern technology.Professor Jena delves into key concepts of quantum physics and quantum computing, shedding light on quantum systems, qubits, and the challenges and promises of quantum hardware. With decades of experience in semiconductor research, he explains how quantum computing could revolutionize industries, from computational speed to energy efficiency.In this conversation, they discuss:The birth of quantum mechanics and its evolution into quantum computingThe role of qubits and superposition in quantum devicesHow quantum computing is tackling complex problems beyond classical computingCurrent advancements in quantum hardware and the roadblocks still aheadProfessor Jena's perspective on the future of quantum technology and its potential impact on industries like AI, communications, and beyondThis episode is a must-watch for anyone curious about the future of quantum technology and its applications in modern science and industry. Professor Jena provides unique insights into how quantum systems are poised to transform computing, energy efficiency, and even artificial intelligence. Whether you're a tech enthusiast, a student of physics, or a professional exploring the frontier of quantum technology, this conversation is packed with invaluable knowledge.Key Topics & Timestamps:00:00 – Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Entanglement, and the Role of Information in Physics05:00 – Classical Computation vs. Quantum Computation: Understanding the Basics of Classical and Quantum Bits12:00 – The Role of Information Erasure and Its Link to Energy Loss in Classical Computing18:00 – Superposition and Entanglement: The Basis of Quantum Computation25:00 – Bell's Theorem and the EPR Paradox: Understanding Quantum Nonlocality32:00 – Quantum Measurement and the Challenge of Formulating the Right Questions in Quantum Computation40:00 – Shor's Algorithm and the Promise of Quantum Speedup for Prime Factorization45:00 – Practical Quantum Computing: Grover's Algorithm and the Search Problem52:00 – The Need for Quantum Error Correction and the Problem of Decoherence in Quantum Systems58:00 – Superconducting Qubits: The Technology Behind Quantum Hardware1:05:00 – The Challenges of Packing More Qubits: Coherence Time and Integration of Quantum Systems1:12:00 – Temperature and Cooling Requirements for Superconducting Qubits1:20:00 – Advances in Quantum Error Correction and Strategies for Scaling Quantum Devices1:28:00 – Future Directions for Quantum Computing: Materials Science, Algorithms, and Hardware Innovations1:35:00 – Schrödinger's Cat: Exploring Quantum Superposition in a Philosophical Context1:45:00 – The Double-Slit Experiment: Quantum Interference and the Nature of Quantum Systems1:50:00 – The Future of Quantum Computing: Overcoming Challenges and Expanding Practical Applications2:00:00 – Concluding Thoughts on the Impact of Quantum Mechanics on Modern Technology and the Future of ComputingHosts:Amit Prakash: Co-founder and CTO at ThoughtSpot, former engineer at Google and Microsoft, and expert in distributed systems and machine learning.Guest:Professor Debdeep Jena: David E. Burr Professor of Engineering at Cornell University, expert in semiconductors, superconductors, and quantum devices.Follow the Hosts and Guest:Amit Prakash: LinkedIn | XDebdeep Jena: LinkedInHave questions or thoughts on AI? Drop us a mail at effortlesspodcasthq@gmail.comDon't forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more insightful conversations on the future of technology and innovation!

Join Dave and Wayne for genre television show news, a glimpse into what the hosts are watching, listener feedback, and analysis of the Apple TV+ series Dark Matter. This week on the SciFi TV Rewatch podcast we discuss the differing dilemmas facing Jason Prime and Amanda as he searches for his world, and she searches for a world to call her new home.   In our What We're Watching segment, Dave returns to film and enjoys the Dylan Thomas centered The Edge of Love. Wayne, once again, seems a bit disappointed with the latest episode of Doctor Who, another Doctor-lite tale. In Listener Feedback, Fred from the Netherlands, Alan in England, and Alan in Missouri provide their weekly audio feedback, and Cincinnati Joe checks in via email.  Remember to join the genre television and film discussion on the SciFi TV Rewatch Facebook group for the latest genre television show news and podcast releases. Episode Grade: A  

In der zweiten Folge zu Post-Quantum-Cryptography sprechen Calso und Chris mit Sebastian über die faszinierende Welt des Quantencomputings – und die potenzielle Bedrohung, die diese Technologie für Bitcoin darstellen könnte.Was genau ist ein Quantencomputer? Wie funktionieren Qubits, Superposition und logische Qubits? Und vor allem: Wie realistisch ist das Szenario, dass Bitcoin durch Quantenangriffe gefährdet wird?Wir werfen einen Blick auf den aktuellen Forschungsstand, diskutieren mögliche Angriffsziele wie Signaturen oder Mining, und besprechen Lösungsansätze wie BIP 360 und Post-Quantum-Kryptografie. Sollte man im Notfall Coins „beschlagnahmen“ – und wäre die Community überhaupt bereit, sich schnell genug anzupassen?Von und mit: [[Calso, Chris ]]Produziert und geschnitten: ChrisHier könnt ihr uns eine Spende über Lightning da lassen: ⚡️nodesignal@getalby.comWenn euch unsere Arbeit gefällt, könnt ihr unsere Folgen auch auf Podcasting 2.0 Plattformen, wie Fountain, PodcastGuru, Castamatic, Breez oder Podverse hören und uns so eine kleine Aufmerksamkeit da lassen. Danke an alle, die die Bitcoin Community mit ihren Spenden unterstützen! Mit diesen Spenden wird unter anderem unser Bounty Programm verwirklicht, in dem ihr euch für die Mitarbeit an einem Projekt eine Belohnung sichern könnt.Für Feedback und weitergehenden Diskussionen kommt gerne in die Telegramgruppe von Nodesignal und bewertet uns bei Spotify und Apple Podcasts. Folgt uns auch gerne bei Nostr:npub1n0devk3h2l3rx6vmt24a3lz4hsxp7j8rn3x44jkx6daj7j8jzc0q2u02cy und Twitter.Blockzeit: 893450@sebastianvstaa auf XNostr: npub1emsh676rdg2ahqlmsqewf5emkl88jgmunxe64hg6v79r070pfyeq22txmyHow Quantum Computers Break The Internet... Starting NowNachgehackt: Post-Quanten-KryptographieForschungsquartett | Post-Quanten-Kryptografie – Sicher im Zeitalter der Quantencomputer | detektor.fm – Das Podcast-RadioWILL QUANTUM BREAK BITCOIN? W/ Hunter Beasthttps://github.com/cryptoquick/bips/blob/p2qrh/bip-0360.mediawikiNovember 18, 2022 M-23-02 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES FROM: Shalanda D. Young Director SUBJEChttps://mailing-list.bitcoindevs.xyz/bitcoindev/CALkkCJY=dv6cZ_HoUNQybF4-byGOjME3Jt2DRr20yZqMmdJUnQ@mail.gmail.com/Timestamps:(00:00:22) Intro und Vorstellung Sebastian(00:07:14) Was sind nochmal Quanten Computer?(00:25:41) Quantenbedrohung für Bitcoin(00:32:11) Mining und andere Risiken(00:33:10) Lösungsansätze und BIP 360(00:45:32) Reaktionen der Core Entwickler und der Community(00:50:44) Philosophisches und Governance(00:57:13) Wie ist die Timeline?(01:01:22) Die Zusammenfassung(01:08:08) Verabschiedung

Today we are joined by philosopher Jennifer Nagel for a take-no-prisoners look at universal skepticism—philosophy's greatest deception. We unpack why doubt itself is the ultimate illusion, how knowledge is primitive instant recognition, and what this means for self, free will & consciousness. As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 01:28 The Nature of Knowledge 10:58 Philosophers and the Skeptical Mindset 16:57 Types of Skepticism 22:27 Exploring Knowledge Attribution 29:51 The Illusion of Knowledge 34:16 Knowing Without Knowing 38:10 Writing About Knowledge 46:10 Analyzing Knowledge 55:08 The Gettier Problem and Its Challenges 1:01:10 The Functionality of Knowledge 1:11:23 Collaborative Understanding of Knowledge 2:10:00 Understanding and Consciousness 2:26:32 Truth and Its Nature 2:32:16 Superposition and Contradictions 2:32:19 Conclusion Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/SpotifyTOE Become a YouTube Member (Early Access Videos): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join Links Mentioned: - Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction (book): https://www.amazon.com/Knowledge-Very-Short-Introduction-Introductions/dp/019966126X - Knowledge and its Limits (book): https://www.amazon.ca/Knowledge-its-Limits-Timothy-Williamson/dp/019925656X - Very Short Introductions (series): https://www.google.com/search?q=a+very+short+introduction+to+series&sca_esv=3da4db664be6b3a1&ei=ypX6Z6flHsDniLMP2v2QkQk&ved=0ahUKEwin8oSB9tKMAxXAM2IAHdo-JJIQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=a+very+short+introduction+to+series&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiI2EgdmVyeSBzaG9ydCBpbnRyb2R1Y3Rpb24gdG8gc2VyaWVzMgUQABiABDILEAAYgAQYhgMYigUyCxAAGIAEGIYDGIoFMgsQABiABBiGAxiKBTIIEAAYogQYiQUyCBAAGIAEGKIEMggQABiABBiiBDIFEAAY7wVIqBRQxAtYwBBwAXgAkAEAmAFZoAGtAqoBATS4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgSgAocCwgIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR8ICDRAuGIAEGLADGEMYigXCAg0QABiABBiwAxhDGIoFwgIPEAAYgAQYQxiKBRhGGPsBwgIbEAAYgAQYQxiKBRhGGPsBGJcFGIwFGN0E2AEBwgIGEAAYBxgemAMAiAYBkAYKugYGCAEQARgTkgcBNKAHph6yBwEzuAf_AQ&sclient=gws-wiz-serp#wgvs=e - Time: A Very Short Introduction (book): https://www.amazon.ca/Time-Short-Introduction-Jenann-Ismael/dp/0198832664 - Laplace meets Godel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB3tS7j7nNU - Flexible Goals (paper): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cogs.13195 - The Legend of the Justified True Belief Analysis (paper): https://philpapers.org/archive/DUTTLO-3.pdf - Lay Denial of Knowledge for Justified True Beliefs (paper): https://philpapers.org/archive/NAGLDO - TOE's Consciousness Iceberg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDjnEiys98o - Matt Segal on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeTm4fSXpbM - Curt reads Plato's Cave: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PurNlwnxwfY - David Bentley Hart on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEAgVvW9i10 - Donald Hoffman on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmieNQH7Q4w&t=1s - Iain McGilchrist on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-SgOwc6Pe4&t=6326s&ab_channel=CurtJaimungal - Geoffrey Hinton on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_DUft-BdIE - John Vervaeke on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVj1KYGyesI&t=1s - Wolfgang Smith on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp18_L_y_30 - Polymath's Ai panel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abzXzPBW4_s - Donald Hoffman and Philip Goff on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmaIBxkqcT4 - Robert Sapolsky on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0IqA1hYKY8&pp=ygUUY3VydCByb2JlcnQgc2Fwb2xza3k%3D - Curt debunks the “all possible paths” myth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcY3ZtgYis0&t=46s Support TOE on Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs #science Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

durée : 00:59:55 - Gerald Clayton "Ones & Twos" - par : Nicolas Pommaret - Le nouvel album du pianiste et compositeur Gerald Clayton est une collection de musique originale habilement écrite, pleine de groove et tournée vers l'avenir, interprétée par quelques-uns des meilleurs musiciens improvisateurs de leur génération. “Ones & Twos” paraît chez Blue Note.

Send us a textIn this week's episode we discussed the fascinating world of quantum computing. Exploring how it works, why it's a game-changer, and what it means for the future of technology. From the basics of qubits and quantum algorithms to its potential to revolutionize industries like pharmaceuticals, AI, and cybersecurity, we break down the big ideas behind this cutting-edge field. We'll also explore the challenges, ethical considerations, and the race between tech giants and governments to unlock quantum's true potential.Our Links:Retrospect

In dieser Folge tauchen Alois und Oliver gemeinsam mit ihrem Gast Benedikt-Sebastian Mehmel von Hamburg Quantum Innovation Capital (hqic) tief in die Welt des Quantencomputings ein. Es wird erklärt, wie sich klassische Bits von Quantenbits (Qubits) unterscheiden – während Bits nur die Zustände 0 und 1 darstellen, können Qubits dank Superposition gleichzeitig beide Zustände annehmen. Dadurch ergeben sich exponentielle Steigerungen in der Rechenleistung, da mehrere Informationszustände parallel verarbeitet werden können.Die Diskussion beleuchtet darüber hinaus auch die zentralen Herausforderungen der Technologie:Technische Hürden:Die extremen Anforderungen an Temperaturkontrolle, Vibrationsempfindlichkeit und die Notwendigkeit einer effektiven Fehlerkorrektur werden ausführlich thematisiert. Unterschiedliche Ansätze – von atomaren Qubits und Ionenfallen bis hin zu schaltkreisbasierten Systemen wie bei IBM – werden vorgestellt, wobei jede Methode ihre eigenen Vor- und Nachteile aufweist.Praktische Anwendungsfälle:Konkrete Beispiele, wie die Optimierung von Flugabläufen an Flughäfen und die effizientere Steuerung von Hafenprozessen, zeigen, dass Quantencomputing bereits jetzt das Potential besitzt, komplexe und rechenintensive Probleme zu lösen. Auch der Vergleich mit der aktuellen Entwicklung im Bereich klassischer Rechenzentren und KI wird gezogen, wobei das Ziel klar bleibt: mit weniger Energieaufwand mehr Leistung zu erzielen.Quantum Supremacy und Cybersecurity:Anhand des Beispiels der Google Sycamore Maschine wird das Konzept der Quantum Supremacy erklärt – der Moment, in dem ein Quantencomputer eine spezifische Aufgabe deutlich schneller löst als der beste klassische Ansatz. Gleichzeitig wird auch auf zukünftige Herausforderungen in der Cybersecurity hingewiesen, da die Weiterentwicklung der Quantencomputer auch die bestehenden Verschlüsselungsmethoden bedrohen könnte und deshalb bereits heute an post-quantum Sicherheitsstandards gearbeitet wird.Die Quantenrevolutionen:Abschließend wird die Entwicklung von der ersten Quantenrevolution (die Entstehung und Anwendung der Quantenmechanik in klassischen Technologien) über die zweite Quantenrevolution (den Übergang vom Labor in die Anwendung durch den kontrollierten Einsatz einzelner Qubits) bis hin zu ersten Ansätzen einer dritten Revolution diskutiert – einem möglichen Zusammenführen von Quantenmechanik und anderen Disziplinen wie der Gravitation.

Develop your superpowers, synchronize your transformation with planet Earth, tap into what's possible, and catalyze what seems impossible. Practice changing the greater challenges of life, bringing brighter opportunities for super growth. Embrace the sacred feminine into your higher awareness!

Send us a textIn this exciting episode, we dive into the mind-bending world of quantum computing—a futuristic technology that has the potential to revolutionize the way we use artificial intelligence (AI)! But don't worry, we break it all down in a way that's fun and easy to understand.

All things are possible for those who believe is a quantum reality statement. In Quantum Physics, there is an understanding that matter at its smallest existence exists in a state of superposition, meaning unlimited potentials, at the same time, until someone or something observes the matter. This is true of God's Kingdom as well. Join us as we talk about how quantum realities reveal mysteries about the unseen realm.

Superposition d'une perturbation électromagnétique ou d'un signal perturbateur au signal utile qui passe sur une liaison hertzienne, le brouillage dégrade, interrompt ou empêche le bon fonctionnement de ces bandes de fréquences. Si l'ANFR lutte déjà activement contre les brouillages, elle milite également pour qu'ils soient pris en compte dans le portefeuille des risques cyber. -----------------------------------------------------------------------SMART TECH - Le magazine quotidien de l'innovationDans SMART TECH, l'actu du numérique et de l'innovation prend tout son sens. Chaque jour, des spécialistes décryptent les actualités, les tendances, et les enjeux soulevés par l'adoption des nouvelles technologies.

The music of composer Shamar Watt (aka BongoWattZ), whose work incorporates everything from techno to gospel, with excerpts from the artist's archive alongside commentary on his Jamaican heritage, spirituality, technology, and noise. Watt performs at Roulette on March 1, 2025 as part of the annual Mixology Festival.https://roulette.org/

This week hosts Gar and the GarFather welcome our special guest DenBob. Join us as we discuss bed sleeping habits, the DC plane crash, Severance, and some incredible listener feedback!! IMPORTANT SHOW LINKS Join the GarNation family on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Discord⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Find the GarCast on social media via ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Linktree⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Email ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠thegarcast@gmail.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  Find all our closing music in a play list on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Spotify⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠! If you want, you can send us a voice message by following this link  ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://anchor.fm/garcast/message⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  MUSIC CREDITS Intro Music Dead To The World by Clyde ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube Video Here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  Closing Music is ⁠GONE CHECK OUT FRIENDS OF THE SHOW The ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Lousy At Gaming Podcast⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Seal Podcast⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Be sure to check out Clyde on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook

The music of composer Shamar Watt (aka BongoWattZ), whose work incorporates everything from techno to gospel, ecstatic movement, and manipulated light, with excerpts from the artist's archive alongside commentary on his Jamaican heritage, spirituality, technology, and noise. Watt performs at Roulette on March 1, 2025 as part of the annual Mixology Festival and again on March 13 with Lester St. Louis.

Episode 297. Explore the rise, fall, and future of the digital age with Death of the Internet, the podcast that dives deep into how the online world has evolved--and how it's unraveling. From the golden age of open forum to the era of algorithms, surveillance, and censorship, we investigate the force shaping the decline of a free and open internet. Enjoy the show!   LRPod Network, only on Patreon   LRPod Headquarters

Tällä kertaa kartanon vieraaksi saapui IQM-kvanttitietokoneyrityksen perustaja Juha Vartiainen.  Sillä hän tietää tietää kvanteista ja kubiteista kaiken tietämisen arvoisen.  Jaksossa keskustelemme mikä on kvanttitietokone ja mitkä ovat kvanttitietokoneiden tärkeimmät käyttökohteet. Entä tulevatko kvanttitietokoneet mullistamaan maailman? Äänijulkaisun lähdeluettelo: Juha Vartiainen https://www.linkedin.com/in/vartiainen/ LUMI-supertietokone, Kajaani https://lumi-supercomputer.eu/ Herrasmieshakkerit Iinkedln:ssä: https://www.linkedin.com/company/herrasmieshakkerit/ Australian Cybersecurity Bill 2024 https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r7250 Saksa pohtii lakimuutosta tietoturvatutkimuksen selustan suojaamiseksi https://www.scworld.com/news/legal-protections-for-security-researchers-sought-in-new-german-draft-law Evaluating Mitigations & Vulnerabilities in Chrome https://security.googleblog.com/2024/10/evaluating-mitigations-vulnerabilities.html IQM https://www.meetiqm.com/ NSA Releases Internal 1982 Lecture by Computing Pioneer Rear Admiral Grace Hopper https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bP14OzIJWI Suomen Tietokonemuseon rahankeräys tilavuokran maksamiseen (lupa RA/2024/1852): lähetä MobilePaylla tukisummasi numeroon 18353 https://suomentietokonemuseo.fi/ Flipperin SM-kisat, finaali (stream-tallenne): https://www.youtube.com/live/gp9fhYlDHGM?si=8ta94TxGvFSb-BgN&t=27293

Dario Amodei is the CEO of Anthropic, the company that created Claude. Amanda Askell is an AI researcher working on Claude's character and personality. Chris Olah is an AI researcher working on mechanistic interpretability. Thank you for listening ❤ Check out our sponsors: https://lexfridman.com/sponsors/ep452-sc See below for timestamps, transcript, and to give feedback, submit questions, contact Lex, etc. Transcript: https://lexfridman.com/dario-amodei-transcript CONTACT LEX: Feedback - give feedback to Lex: https://lexfridman.com/survey AMA - submit questions, videos or call-in: https://lexfridman.com/ama Hiring - join our team: https://lexfridman.com/hiring Other - other ways to get in touch: https://lexfridman.com/contact EPISODE LINKS: Claude: https://claude.ai Anthropic's X: https://x.com/AnthropicAI Anthropic's Website: https://anthropic.com Dario's X: https://x.com/DarioAmodei Dario's Website: https://darioamodei.com Machines of Loving Grace (Essay): https://darioamodei.com/machines-of-loving-grace Chris's X: https://x.com/ch402 Chris's Blog: https://colah.github.io Amanda's X: https://x.com/AmandaAskell Amanda's Website: https://askell.io SPONSORS: To support this podcast, check out our sponsors & get discounts: Encord: AI tooling for annotation & data management. Go to https://encord.com/lex Notion: Note-taking and team collaboration. Go to https://notion.com/lex Shopify: Sell stuff online. Go to https://shopify.com/lex BetterHelp: Online therapy and counseling. Go to https://betterhelp.com/lex LMNT: Zero-sugar electrolyte drink mix. Go to https://drinkLMNT.com/lex OUTLINE: (00:00) - Introduction (10:19) - Scaling laws (19:25) - Limits of LLM scaling (27:51) - Competition with OpenAI, Google, xAI, Meta (33:14) - Claude (36:50) - Opus 3.5 (41:36) - Sonnet 3.5 (44:56) - Claude 4.0 (49:07) - Criticism of Claude (1:01:54) - AI Safety Levels (1:12:42) - ASL-3 and ASL-4 (1:16:46) - Computer use (1:26:41) - Government regulation of AI (1:45:30) - Hiring a great team (1:54:19) - Post-training (1:59:45) - Constitutional AI (2:05:11) - Machines of Loving Grace (2:24:17) - AGI timeline (2:36:52) - Programming (2:43:52) - Meaning of life (2:49:58) - Amanda Askell - Philosophy (2:52:26) - Programming advice for non-technical people (2:56:15) - Talking to Claude (3:12:47) - Prompt engineering (3:21:21) - Post-training (3:26:00) - Constitutional AI (3:30:53) - System prompts (3:37:00) - Is Claude getting dumber? (3:49:02) - Character training (3:50:01) - Nature of truth (3:54:38) - Optimal rate of failure (4:01:49) - AI consciousness (4:16:20) - AGI (4:24:58) - Chris Olah - Mechanistic Interpretability (4:29:49) - Features, Circuits, Universality (4:47:23) - Superposition (4:58:22) - Monosemanticity (5:05:14) - Scaling Monosemanticity (5:14:02) - Macroscopic behavior of neural networks (5:18:56) - Beauty of neural networks

When people hear 'quantum physics,' they often think of sci-fi movies using terms like 'quantum realm' to explain away the impossible. But today we're talking about quantum computing, which has moved beyond science fiction into reality. Companies like IBM and Google are racing to build machines that could transform medicine, energy storage, and our understanding of the universe.But there's a catch: these same computers could potentially break most of the security protecting our digital lives, from WhatsApp messages to bank transfers to military secrets. To address this threat, the National Institute of Standards and Technology recently released quantum-safe cryptography standards, while new government mandates are pushing federal agencies to upgrade their security before quantum systems become cryptographically relevant—in other words, vulnerable to hacks by quantum computers.To help us understand both the promise and peril of quantum computing, we're joined by Travis Scholten, Technical Lead in the Public Sector at IBM and former quantum computing researcher at the company. He's also a former policy hacker at FAI, author of the Quantum Stack newsletter and co-author of a white paper on the benefits and risks of quantum computers. 

Discover the power of Quantum Biology in eliminating stress! Dr. Gary Epler shares life-changing strategies with (1) Quantum Tunneling for instant compassion; (2) Entanglement for connecting to the mind; (3) Superposition for unified thinking from your heart with kindness and the mind for helping others; and (4) Quantum Observer effect to eliminate situational stress. Transform your relationships, work, and daily life with kindness and enduring joy. Learn how to shift your brainwave frequency and live a stress-free life!Dr. Gary Epler / Quantum Biology Eplerian Life Philosophy (QB ELP)

Discover the power of Quantum Biology in eliminating stress! Dr. Gary Epler shares life-changing strategies with (1) Quantum Tunneling for instant compassion; (2) Entanglement for connecting to the mind; (3) Superposition for unified thinking from your heart with kindness and the mind for helping others; and (4) Quantum Observer effect to eliminate situational stress. Transform your relationships, work, and daily life with kindness and enduring joy. Learn how to shift your brainwave frequency and live a stress-free life!Dr. Gary Epler / Quantum Biology Eplerian Life Philosophy (QB ELP)

- The Matrix and the Power of Choice (0:03) - The Simulation of the Cosmos (4:06) - The Multiverse and Free Will (8:34) - The Power of Prayer and Creation (17:19) - The Role of Imagination in Creating Futures (26:54) - The Election and the Power of Choice (33:02) - The Importance of Purity and Integrity (36:50) - The Role of the Simulation in Testing Souls (3:24:08) - The Power of Imagination and Choice (3:48:40) - The Future of Humanity and the Simulation (3:49:02) For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we're helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased scientific transparency. ▶️ Every dollar you spend at the Health Ranger Store goes toward helping us achieve important science and content goals for humanity: https://www.healthrangerstore.com/ ▶️ Sign Up For Our Newsletter: https://www.naturalnews.com/Readerregistration.html ▶️ Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport ▶️ Join Our Social Network: https://brighteon.social/@HealthRanger ▶️ Check In Stock Products at: https://PrepWithMike.com

It's not a loop, it's superposition. Time just isn't linear.Kingmakers is an improvised tale of power and purpose, pain and perseverance- and the legacy of legends using the Otherworld system, produced by resident Tablestory GM Pumpkinberry.Want more Kingmakers? Join our Discord to chat with other fans and the cast. Want more Tablestory? We've got you covered with our ever expanding, multi genre library!Love what we do? You can support the show by grabbing some merch or backing us directly to keep the dice rolling.And as always, thanks for listening. ♥

Uri Ferruccio is co-founder of Concordia, the first Adaptive Risk Layer that mitigates market risk for all of DeFi, and Tabiya Capital, a VC fund for next-gen data technologies. Why you should listen Concordia aims to improve blockchain technology by infusing it with artificial intelligence, and the mission is to create an intelligent layer that acts as the “brain” for blockchain infrastructure. Concordia delivers a scalable modular Adaptive Risk Layer that mitigates market risk and paves the way for mass adoption. Concordia serves as a catalyst for unlocking DeFi's true potential by addressing core challenges and facilitating mass adoption. Through its modular Adaptive Risk Layer, developers can create groundbreaking applications, leveraging dynamic, AI-powered risk management for composable innovation. This proactive approach enhances resilience against systemic risks, safeguarding users and fostering trust. As a result, Concordia empowers a new era of institutional adoption, forging a path towards a secure, scalable, and inclusive DeFi future. Its innovative framework cultivates a robust ecosystem, encouraging widespread participation and driving DeFi towards its full potential. Functioning as a central hub for the next generation of DeFi innovation, Concordia's Adaptive Risk Layer offers unparalleled flexibility and adaptability. This enables builders to construct leading-edge projects within the ecosystem, promoting collaboration and pushing the boundaries of DeFi possibilities. Concordia's risk model creates a fertile ground for incubating cutting-edge DeFi protocols such as Superposition, paving the way for a wave of groundbreaking advancements yet to come. Each new protocol built upon Concordia further strengthens the AI engine, fueling its continuous learning and improvement through a powerful flywheel effect. Supporting links Stabull Finance Concordia Andy on Twitter  Brave New Coin on Twitter Brave New Coin If you enjoyed the show please subscribe to the Crypto Conversation and give us a 5-star rating and a positive review in whatever podcast app you are using.  

This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you by Incogni...looking after your online privacy with no hassles. To check out our special Space Nuts deal, visit www.incogni.com/spacenutsJoin Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this thought-provoking Q&A episode of Space Nuts, where they tackle intriguing questions from our listeners about dark matter, flawed mathematics, black holes, and more.Episode Highlights:- Dark Matter Debate: Kevin from Melbourne challenges the Timms on their previous discussion about dark matter, questioning whether SpaceTime itself could be the elusive substance.- Flawed Mathematics: Simon wonders if the breakdown of models at the extremes of the universe is due to our mathematics being flawed. Could our system of mathematics be misaligned with the real world?- Black Holes and Spin: Isaac from Brisbane, aged nine, asks how black holes spin if they take up no Space and why spin affects Space.- Gravity and Space: Isaac's dad inquires about how gravity bends Space and thus bends light traveling past it.- Energy in Space: Rusty from Donnybrook speculates about harnessing the energy of Space and the potential for one g drives to revolutionise Space travel.- 00:00:00 - This is a q and a edition of Space Nuts- 00:01:05 - Kevin from Melbourne asks whether spacetime itself might be dark matter- 00:07:22 - Is it possible that breakdown of models is due to our mathematics being flawed- 00:11:38 - Simon: I just finished watching a science fiction series called dark matter- 00:13:01 - Why do black holes spin if they take up no space- 00:15:11 - Isaac's dad wants to know how gravity bends space- 00:16:56 - Fred and Andrew: Soon we'll harness the energy of space itself- 00:18:39 - If we could achieve one g drive, it would make travel around the solar system pretty schmick- 00:24:16 - Space Nuts podcast available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadioFor more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed, visit our website at spacenutspodcast.com. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on facebook, X, YouTube Music, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform. For more Space and Astronomy News Podcasts, visit our HQ at www.bitesz.com. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts/support.Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.

How do we figure out what large language models believe? In fact, do they even have beliefs? Do those beliefs have locations, and if so, can we edit those locations to change the beliefs? Also, how are we going to get AI to perform tasks so hard that we can't figure out if they succeeded at them? In this episode, I chat to Peter Hase about his research into these questions. Patreon: patreon.com/axrpodcast Ko-fi: ko-fi.com/axrpodcast The transcript: https://axrp.net/episode/2024/08/24/episode-35-peter-hase-llm-beliefs-easy-to-hard-generalization.html   Topics we discuss, and timestamps: 0:00:36 - NLP and interpretability 0:10:20 - Interpretability lessons 0:32:22 - Belief interpretability 1:00:12 - Localizing and editing models' beliefs 1:19:18 - Beliefs beyond language models 1:27:21 - Easy-to-hard generalization 1:47:16 - What do easy-to-hard results tell us? 1:57:33 - Easy-to-hard vs weak-to-strong 2:03:50 - Different notions of hardness 2:13:01 - Easy-to-hard vs weak-to-strong, round 2 2:15:39 - Following Peter's work   Peter on Twitter: https://x.com/peterbhase   Peter's papers: Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09932 Do Language Models Have Beliefs? Methods for Detecting, Updating, and Visualizing Model Beliefs: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.13654 Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Models: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.04213 Are Language Models Rational? The Case of Coherence Norms and Belief Revision: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03442 The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Easy Training Data for Hard Tasks: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06751   Other links: Toy Models of Superposition: https://transformer-circuits.pub/2022/toy_model/index.html Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV): https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11279 Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT (aka the ROME paper): https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05262 Of nonlinearity and commutativity in BERT: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04547 Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03341 Editing a classifier by rewriting its prediction rules: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01008 Discovering Latent Knowledge Without Supervision (aka the Collin Burns CCS paper): https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03827 Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervision: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09390 Concrete problems in AI safety: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565 Rissanen Data Analysis: Examining Dataset Characteristics via Description Length: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03872   Episode art by Hamish Doodles: hamishdoodles.com

Ivette Fuentes is a leading theoretical physicist specializing in quantum information and quantum gravity, holding a PhD from Imperial College London. Ivette is currently collaborating with Sir Roger Penrose on groundbreaking research exploring the intersection of quantum mechanics and general relativity, particularly focusing on the role of quantum effects in the nature of spacetime. Get a 20% discount on The Economist's annual digital subscriptions at https://www.economist.com/TOE YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/cUj2TcZSlZc Become a YouTube Member Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!) Join TOEmail at https://www.curtjaimungal.org Episode Links: - Curt on Julian Dorey's podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1mKNGo9JLQ - Ivette's first paper on Seyfert galaxies: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/311925/pdf - Ivette's paper (Alice falls into a black hole): https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0410172 - Part 1 of Ivette's papers on confined quantum scalar fields: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.10507 - Multiverse Ivette Fuentes: Roger Penrose on LIGO controversy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoR_WbACfPo - Women in Maths - Ivette Fuentes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5ASV7NWn38 Presentation Links: - Spacetime effects on satellite-based quantum communications: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.3088 - Testing the effects of gravity and motion on quantum entanglement in space-based experiments: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.1933 - Resolving the gravitational redshift within a millimeter atomic sample: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.12238 - Motion and gravity effects in the precision of quantum clocks: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.4235 - Gravitational time dilation in extended quantum systems: the case of light clocks in Schwarzschild spacetime: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.07869 - Exploring the unification of quantum theory and general relativity with a Bose-Einstein condensate: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.04630 - A trapped atom interferometer with ultracold Sr atoms: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.06092 Quantum Frequency Interferometry: with applications ranging from gravitational wave detection to dark matter searches: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.02618 Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 01:20 - Unification in Physics 04:15 - Ivette's Background 21:00 - Fundamental Questions Unanswered 23:54 - Quantum Theory and Relativity 30:17 - Superpositions 33:49 - Using Technology to Develop New Theories 39:08 - Exploring Large and Small Scales 48:32 - Long Range Experiments / Quantum Teleportation 57:36 - Quantum Clocks 01:06:46 - Relativistic Quantum Clock Model 01:13:57 - Does Gravity Collapse the Superposition? 01:17:18 - Where the Field is Now 01:22:04 - Bose-Einstein Condenstate 01:26:11 - New Device: Atom Interferometer 01:37:38 - Testing Ivette's Predictions 01:38:53 - Outro / Support TOE Support TOE: - Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!) - Crypto: https://tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE - PayPal: https://tinyurl.com/paypalTOE - TOE Merch: https://tinyurl.com/TOEmerch Follow TOE: - NEW Get my 'Top 10 TOEs' PDF + Weekly Personal Updates: https://www.curtjaimungal.org - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theoriesofeverythingpod - TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@theoriesofeverything_ - Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt - Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs - iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal/id1521758802 - Pandora: https://pdora.co/33b9lfP - Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e - Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: https://reddit.com/r/theoriesofeverything Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join #science Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rick Altherr spoke with us about high-speed control, complicated systems, and making quantum computers. If you want to know more about building quantum computers, take a listen to Rick's MacroFab episode: The Nuts and Bolts of Quantum Computing. If you want to make your own quantum circuit simulator, it only takes 27 lines of Python: A Quantum Circuit Simulator in 27 Lines of Python. What about if you actually want to know about quantum computing? Rick suggests Quantum computing for the very curious while we look back at Embedded.fm 344: Superposition, Entanglement, and Interference with Kitty Yeung, talking about her Quantum Computing Comic book and Hackaday lecture series.  Rick works for IonQ where they do trapped-ion quantum computing (there are different physics methods for making ions dance to the tune of quantum computing). If you want to talk to Rick, maybe to get his advice about your resume or career prospects, he sets aside a few hours each week to share his wisdom: https://calendly.com/mxshift You can also find Rick on Mastodon and LinkedIn. He was also the guest on 311: Attack Other People's Refrigerators about security hacking and mentoring. Transcript

A carnival collective and brass band's take on a Britney Spear mega-hit open the dances, literally, and set the tone for a playlist full of surprises. The playlist features Thiago França [pictured], A Espetacular Charanga do França; Altus; Welf Dorr, Elias Meister, Dmitry Ishenko, Kenny Wollesen; Emanuele Primavera; Kim Cass; Superposition. Detailed playlist at https://spinitron.com/RFB/pl/19343552/Mondo-Jazz [from "Toxic" onwards] Happy listening!

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: How ARENA course material gets made, published by CallumMcDougall on July 3, 2024 on LessWrong. TL;DR In this post, I describe my methodology for building new material for ARENA. I'll mostly be referring to the exercises on IOI, Superposition and Function Vectors as case studies. I expect this to be useful for people who are interested in designing material for ARENA or ARENA-like courses, as well as people who are interested in pedagogy or ML paper replications. The process has 3 steps: 1. Start with something concrete 2. First pass: replicate, and understand 3. Second pass: exercise-ify Summary I'm mostly basing this on the following 3 sets of exercises: Indirect Object Identification - these exercises focus on the IOI paper (from Conmy et al). The goal is to have people understand what exploratory analysis of transformers looks like, and introduce the key ideas of the circuits agenda. Superposition & SAEs - these exercises focus on understanding superposition and the agenda of dictionary learning (specifically sparse autoencoders). Most of the exercises explore Anthropic's Toy Models of Superposition paper, except for the last 2 sections which explore sparse autoencoders (firstly by applying them to the toy model setup, secondly by exploring a sparse autoencoder trained on a language model). Function Vectors - these exercises focus on the Function Vectors paper by David Bau et al, although they also make connections with related work such as Alex Turner's GPT2-XL steering vector work. These exercises were interesting because they also had the secondary goal of being an introduction to the nnsight library, in much the same way that the intro to mech interp exercises were also an introduction to TransformerLens. The steps I go through are listed below. I'm indexing from zero because I'm a software engineer so of course I am. The steps assume you already have an idea of what exercises you want to create; in Appendix (1) you can read some thoughts on what makes for a good exercise set. 1. Start with something concrete When creating material, you don't want to be starting from scratch. It's useful to have source code available to browse - bonus points if that takes the form of a Colab or something which is self-contained and has easily visible output. IOI - this was Neel's "Exploratory Analysis Demo" exercises. The rest of the exercises came from replicating the paper directly. Superposition - this was Anthroic's Colab notebook (although the final version went quite far beyond this). The very last section (SAEs on transformers) was based on Neel Nanda's demo Colab). Function Vectors - I started with the NDIF demo notebook, to show how some basic nnsight syntax worked. As for replicating the actual function vectors paper, unlike the other 2 examples I was mostly just working from the paper directly. It helped that I was collaborating with some of this paper's authors, so I was able to ask them some questions to clarify aspects of the paper. 2. First-pass: replicate, and understand The first thing I'd done in each of these cases was go through the material I started with, and make sure I understood what was going on. Paper replication is a deep enough topic for its own series of blog posts (many already exist), although I'll emphasise that I'm not usually talking about full paper replication here, because ideally you'll be starting from something a it further along, be that a Colab, a different tutorial, or something else. And even when you are just working directly from a paper, you shouldn't make the replication any harder for yourself than you need to. If there's code you can take from somewhere else, then do. My replication usually takes the form of working through a notebook in VSCode. I'll either start from scratch, or from a downloaded Colab if I'm using one as a ...

Seizing the future with Quantum Computing Ireland has a rich history of pioneering contributions in the field of quantum science. From the mathematical foundations laid by Dublin physicist William Rowan Hamilton (1805-1865), who created Hamiltonian mechanics which is the basis for quantum physics. The pioneering efforts of Belfast physicist John Bell (1928-1990), who in 1964 demonstrated Einstein's view on quantum theory incorrect and set the stage for quantum computing. Today, Ireland continues this tradition with Indigenous organisations, such as Equal1, as well as publicly funded R&D institutions, like ICHEC, that are at the forefront of the quantum technology revolution. This ongoing commitment underscores Ireland's significant role in shaping the global landscape of quantum science and technology. To continue to propel this momentum, the Irish Government launched their 'Quantum 2030 - A National Quantum Technologies Strategy for Ireland'. Aligning with other nations in this transformative technology, the National Quantum Technologies Strategy is a transformative strategy to position Ireland as a leading international hub in Quantum Technologies by 2030. Its vision entails strengthening Ireland's position at the forefront of scientific and engineering advances, achieved through a commitment to research, talent cultivation, strategic collaboration and forward-thinking innovation. The strategy supports 5 key pillars outlined in Figure 1. Positioning quantum computing Why did the Irish Government introduce national strategies on quantum technologies? What motivates countries and large technology organizations to invest in this technology? Addressing these questions requires an appreciation of the value proposition of quantum computing - the capacity to rapidly process extensive data and perform intricate calculations. The computational power is propelled by the fundamental principles of quantum physics. Traditional computers, that power our laptops, mobile phones and High Performance Computer systems (at national labs and commercial cloud services), use bits - either '1' or '0'. A quantum computer, using the laws of quantum physics, drives a completely new approach. The fundamental component of a quantum computer is a quantum bit or a qubit. Like bits, qubits can occupy a state of '0' or '1'. However, qubits can represent any combination of both zero and one simultaneously - a phenomenon of quantum physics known as superposition. Superposition is a key feature that empowers quantum computers to process information in parallel. It describes the situation where a qubit is in a combination of multiple position states at the same time. Therefore, the power of quantum computing comes from the principles of quantum physics where a qubit can be '1', '0', but also any combination (known as a superposition of these states). This leads up to another key concept in quantum computing, which is that the act of observing a superposition will collapse it to either '0' or '1'. Thus, with respect to quantum computing, though many computations can be carried out in parallel, you may observe only one of the results at a time. Another key principle of quantum physics that is critical to the power of quantum computing is Entanglement. This occurs when 2 quantum systems are connected, and a change in one system has an instantaneous change on another. As more qubits are introduced, the states a qubit can occupy double, further enhancing computational capabilities. Positioning quantum computing for business adoption Whilst the technology is very young yet powerful, what does it mean for business? Why should businesses be concerned? According to the McKinsey Quantum Technology Monitor report, the potential quantum technology market by 2040 will be $106B. McKinsey notes that in 2022, total annual quantum technology start-up investment hit a high of $2.35B, with 68% of all quantum technology start-up investment since 2001 occurring between 2021 and ...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: SAE feature geometry is outside the superposition hypothesis, published by Jake Mendel on June 24, 2024 on The AI Alignment Forum. Written at Apollo Research Summary: Superposition-based interpretations of neural network activation spaces are incomplete. The specific locations of feature vectors contain crucial structural information beyond superposition, as seen in circular arrangements of day-of-the-week features and in the rich structures of feature UMAPs. We don't currently have good concepts for talking about this structure in feature geometry, but it is likely very important for model computation. An eventual understanding of feature geometry might look like a hodgepodge of case-specific explanations, or supplementing superposition with additional concepts, or plausibly an entirely new theory that supersedes superposition. To develop this understanding, it may be valuable to study toy models in depth and do theoretical or conceptual work in addition to studying frontier models. Epistemic status: Decently confident that the ideas here are directionally correct. I've been thinking these thoughts for a while, and recently got round to writing them up at a high level. Lots of people (including both SAE stans and SAE skeptics) have thought very similar things before and some of them have written about it in various places too. Some of my views, especially the merit of certain research approaches to tackle the problems I highlight, have been presented here without my best attempt to argue for them. What would it mean if we could fully understand an activation space through the lens of superposition? If you fully understand something, you can explain everything about it that matters to someone else in terms of concepts you (and hopefully they) understand. So we can think about how well I understand an activation space by how well I can communicate to you what the activation space is doing, and we can test if my explanation is good by seeing if you can construct a functionally equivalent activation space (which need not be completely identical of course) solely from the information I have given you. In the case of SAEs, here's what I might say: 1. The activation space contains this list of 100 million features, which I can describe concisely in words because they are monosemantic. 2. The features are embedded as vectors, and the activation vector on any input is a linear combination of the feature vectors that are related to the input. 3. As for where in the activation space each feature vector is placed, oh that doesn't really matter and any nearly orthogonal overcomplete basis will do. Or maybe if I'm being more sophisticated, I can specify the correlations between features and that's enough to pin down all the structure that matters - all the other details of the overcomplete basis are random. Every part of this explanation is in terms of things I understand precisely. My features are described in natural language, and I know what a random overcomplete basis is (although I'm on the fence about whether a large correlation matrix counts as something that I understand). The placement of each feature vector in the activation space matters Why might this description be insufficient? First, there is the pesky problem of SAE reconstruction errors, which are parts of activation vectors that are missed when we give this description. Second, not all features seem monosemantic, and it is hard to find semantic descriptions of even the most monosemantic features that have both high sensitivity and specificity, let alone descriptions which allow us to predict the quantitative values that activating features take on a particular input. But let's suppose that these issues have been solved: SAE improvements lead to perfect reconstruction and extremely monosemantic features, and new ...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: SAE feature geometry is outside the superposition hypothesis, published by jake mendel on June 24, 2024 on LessWrong. Summary: Superposition-based interpretations of neural network activation spaces are incomplete. The specific locations of feature vectors contain crucial structural information beyond superposition, as seen in circular arrangements of day-of-the-week features and in the rich structures of feature UMAPs. We don't currently have good concepts for talking about this structure in feature geometry, but it is likely very important for model computation. An eventual understanding of feature geometry might look like a hodgepodge of case-specific explanations, or supplementing superposition with additional concepts, or plausibly an entirely new theory that supersedes superposition. To develop this understanding, it may be valuable to study toy models in depth and do theoretical or conceptual work in addition to studying frontier models. Epistemic status: Decently confident that the ideas here are directionally correct. I've been thinking these thoughts for a while, and recently got round to writing them up at a high level. Lots of people (including both SAE stans and SAE skeptics) have thought very similar things before and some of them have written about it in various places too. Some of my views, especially the merit of certain research approaches to tackle the problems I highlight, have been presented here without my best attempt to argue for them. What would it mean if we could fully understand an activation space through the lens of superposition? If you fully understand something, you can explain everything about it that matters to someone else in terms of concepts you (and hopefully they) understand. So we can think about how well I understand an activation space by how well I can communicate to you what the activation space is doing, and we can test if my explanation is good by seeing if you can construct a functionally equivalent activation space (which need not be completely identical of course) solely from the information I have given you. In the case of SAEs, here's what I might say: 1. The activation space contains this list of 100 million features, which I can describe concisely in words because they are monosemantic. 2. The features are embedded as vectors, and the activation vector on any input is a linear combination of the feature vectors that are related to the input. 3. As for where in the activation space each feature vector is placed, oh that doesn't really matter and any nearly orthogonal overcomplete basis will do. Or maybe if I'm being more sophisticated, I can specify the correlations between features and that's enough to pin down all the structure that matters - all the other details of the overcomplete basis are random. Every part of this explanation is in terms of things I understand precisely. My features are described in natural language, and I know what a random overcomplete basis is (although I'm on the fence about whether a large correlation matrix counts as something that I understand). The placement of each feature vector in the activation space matters Why might this description be insufficient? First, there is the pesky problem of SAE reconstruction errors, which are parts of activation vectors that are missed when we give this description. Second, not all features seem monosemantic, and it is hard to find semantic descriptions of even the most monosemantic features that have both high sensitivity and specificity, let alone descriptions which allow us to quantitatively predict the quantitative values that activating features take on a particular input. But let's suppose that these issues have been solved: SAE improvements lead to perfect reconstruction and extremely monosemantic features, and new autointerp techniques lea...

Our fifth season of "Science Straight Up" kicks off with Dr. Michael Wasielewski of Northwestern University talking about the basics of quantum theory and how it will change our lives.  We can't beam people aboard the starship just yet, but teleportation of information using quantum techniques is happening right now. Many of us have heard about quantum computers and some of the amazing things that they will do, literally a “quantum leap” in performance. However, this is not the whole story. The quantum world and innovative technologies being developed from it will significantly enhance secure communications and be capable of sensing single atoms and molecules, even when they are within living cells. How does this work? Dr Wasielewski has some answers.  Our session was moderated by veteran broadcast journalists Judy Muller and George Lewis.

Today's episode of Dark Matter from AppleTV+ brought a blend of sci-fi and philosophical quandaries for Jim and A.Ron. Non-prime Jason is slipping up in big ways, and his son is paying the price. Daniela is taking action against Jason's suspicious behavior. Keep your romantic gestures to a minimum.  Send feedback to darkmatter@baldmove.com!  Badass Fest VI Tickets HERE Hey there!  Check out https://support.baldmove.com/ to find out how you can gain access to ALL of our premium content, as well as ad-free versions of the podcasts, for just $5 a month! Join the Club! Join the discussion:  Email | Discord | Reddit | Forums Follow us: Twitch | YouTube | Twitter  |  Instagram  |  Facebook Leave Us A Review on Apple Podcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome back to our podcast coverage of AppleTV's new mind-bending show: DARK MATTER! This week, we cover Episode 6: Superposition. OG Jason and Amanda starting get desperate and a little too lovey dovey . . . while Evil J fully justifies his Evil moniker as he continues to struggle with his place in the OG family. More BingetownTV Content! **  Check Out Our Podcast on Youtube!  Check Out Our Youtube Entertainment Channel!  Join the BingetownTV Community Discord (FREE) Follow us on Socials! ** Instagram- https://www.instagram.com/bingetowntv/ Twitter/X - https://twitter.com/bingetowntvpod TikTok- https://www.tiktok.com/@bingetowntv?_t=8gdE279ReTm&_r=1 Support the Pod! Patreon- www.patreon.com/bingetowntv Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome back to our podcast coverage of AppleTV's new mind-bending show: DARK MATTER! This week, we cover Episode 6: Superposition. OG Jason and Amanda starting get despearate and a little too lovey dovey . . . while Evil J fully justifies his Evil moniker as he continues to struggle with his place in the OG family. More BingetownTV Content! **  Check Out Our Podcast on Youtube!  Check Out Our Youtube Entertainment Channel!  Join the BingetownTV Community Discord (FREE) Follow us on Socials! ** Instagram- https://www.instagram.com/bingetowntv/ Twitter/X - https://twitter.com/bingetowntvpod TikTok- https://www.tiktok.com/@bingetowntv?_t=8gdE279ReTm&_r=1 Support the Pod! Patreon- www.patreon.com/bingetowntv Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Could quantum computing solve the three-body problem? Neil deGrasse Tyson and comedians Jordan Klepper and Tiffany Haddish discuss how quantum computing will change the world with theoretical physicist Michio Kaku live at the Beacon Theater. NOTE: StarTalk+ Patrons can listen to this entire episode commercial-free here:https://startalkmedia.com/show/quantum-computing-corral-startalk-live-with-michio-kaku/Thanks to our Patrons PaceOfSpades, Dale Engele, Amr Badawi, Elizabeth Rosalen, Dennis Kutzen, Martin Kjær Jørgensen, Poop Poop, William Jefferson, John Bigelow, and Patrick Scheidegger for supporting us this week.

The concept of superposition exists in both quantum mechanics and evolutionary geology. We start with the strange and counterintuitive world of quantum physics, where particles exist in multiple states until observed. Then, we journey back to 1666 where another kind of superpositionwas discovered—this time in rock layers - allowing us to read Earth's history through its geological layers.  Please consider becoming a show Patron to help keep new episodes coming!   Evolution Talk is also a book! You can find links to Amazon, Barnes & Noble and others on the front page of EvolutionTalk.com, or call your local bookstore and ask them to order a copy. You can also check out the new YouTube channel!   Music in this Episode Three Colors by Podington Bear, License (CC BY 3.0): Artist website: soundofpicture.com Submerging Blue-Black by Podington Bear, License (CC BY 3.0): Artist website: soundofpicture.com Floating by Podington Bear, License (CC BY 3.0): Artist website: soundofpicture.com Chimera by Podington Bear, License (CC BY 3.0): Artist website: soundofpicture.com

Is gravity fundamental to the universe? Neil deGrasse Tyson and Chuck Nice explore quantum physics, the fourth dimension, whether H2O is water, and the many-worlds interpretation with theoretical cosmologist Janna Levin, PhD. NOTE: StarTalk+ Patrons can listen to this entire episode commercial-free here: https://startalkmedia.com/show/cosmic-queries-bits-of-spacetime-with-janna-levin/Thanks to our Patrons Mikal Krane, Tramond Spencer, John R, Laura Morrison, Javier Mejia, Emilio Campín Ramírez de Arellano, Jeff Gauthier, Tom Jones, and Jaired H for supporting us this week.

Episode 690: May 4, 2024 playlist: Mahogany, "A Scaffold" (A Scaffold single) 2024 Darla Susanna, "Everyone Knows" (Everyone Knows) 2024 [self-released] Caribou, "Honey" (Honey) 2024 Merge Fennesz, "Sognato di Domani (excerpt)" (Sognato di Domani) 2024 Touch Simon Fisher Turner, "Barefeet" (Instability of the Signal) 2024 Mute Windy and Carl, "The Llama's Dream" (Consciousness) 2000 Kranky HTRK, "Dream Symbol (Loraine James Remix)" (Dream Symbol (Loraine James Remix)) 2024 [self-released] France Jobin, "Superposition (excerpt)" (Infinite Probabilities (Particle 2)) 2024 Room40 Explosions in the Sky, "Moving On" (End) 2023 Temporary Residence Limpe Fuchs, "Trommeln" (Amor) 2024 Play Loud Email podcast at brainwashed dot com to say who you are; what you like; what you want to hear; share pictures for the podcast of where you're from, your computer or MP3 player with or without the Brainwashed Podcast Playing; and win free music! We have no tracking information, no idea who's listening to these things so the more feedback that comes in, the more frequent podcasts will come. You will not be put on any spam list and your information will remain completely private and not farmed out to a third party. Thanks for your attention and thanks for listening.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Superposition is not "just" neuron polysemanticity, published by Lawrence Chan on April 26, 2024 on The AI Alignment Forum. TL;DR: In this post, I distinguish between two related concepts in neural network interpretability: polysemanticity and superposition. Neuron polysemanticity is the observed phenomena that many neurons seem to fire (have large, positive activations) on multiple unrelated concepts. Superposition is a specific explanation for neuron (or attention head) polysemanticity, where a neural network represents more sparse features than there are neurons (or number of/dimension of attention heads) in near-orthogonal directions. I provide three ways neurons/attention heads can be polysemantic without superposition: non--neuron aligned orthogonal features, non-linear feature representations, and compositional representation without features. I conclude by listing a few reasons why it might be important to distinguish the two concepts. Epistemic status: I wrote this "quickly" in about 12 hours, as otherwise it wouldn't have come out at all. Think of it as a (failed) experiment in writing brief and unpolished research notes, along the lines of GDM or Anthropic Interp Updates. Introduction Meaningfully interpreting neural networks involves decomposing them into smaller interpretable components. For example, we might hope to look at each neuron or attention head, explain what that component is doing, and then compose our understanding of individual components into a mechanistic understanding of the model's behavior as a whole. It would be very convenient if the natural subunits of neural networks - neurons and attention heads - are monosemantic - that is, each component corresponds to "a single concept". Unfortunately, by default, both neurons and attention heads seem to be polysemantic: many of them seemingly correspond to multiple unrelated concepts. For example, out of 307k neurons in GPT-2, GPT-4 was able to generate short explanations that captured over >50% variance for only 5203 neurons, and a quick glance at OpenAI microscope reveals many examples of neurons in vision models that fire on unrelated clusters such as "poetry" and "dice". One explanation for polysemanticity is the superposition hypothesis: polysemanticity occurs because models are (approximately) linearly representing more features[1] than their activation space has dimensions (i.e. place features in superposition). Since there are more features than neurons, it immediately follows that some neurons must correspond to more than one feature.[2] It's worth noting that most written resources on superposition clearly distinguish between the two terms. For example, in the seminal Toy Model of Superposition,[3] Elhage et al write: Why are we interested in toy models? We believe they are useful proxies for studying the superposition we suspect might exist in real neural networks. But how can we know if they're actually a useful toy model? Our best validation is whether their predictions are consistent with empirical observations regarding polysemanticity. ( Source) Similarly, Neel Nanda's mech interp glossary explicitly notes that the two concepts are distinct: Subtlety: Neuron superposition implies polysemanticity (since there are more features than neurons), but not the other way round. There could be an interpretable basis of features, just not the standard basis - this creates polysemanticity but not superposition. ( Source) However, I've noticed empirically that many researchers and grantmakers identify the two concepts, which often causes communication issues or even confused research proposals. Consequently, this post tries to more clearly point at the distinction and explain why it might matter. I start by discussing the two terms in more detail, give a few examples of why you might have po...

In this episode of The Balcony Show, we are bringing you music and an interview with super talent The New Realm! Ryan and Lee are on to talk about their new album “Not The End Of The World” and it is stellar! Our dude of all things awesome Madcat has the song “Turn To Dust” by Red Rumble, Donna is Spotlighting the song “Superposition” from Sam Louis, Bo has another great tip on Indie Radar and AJ is talking more band name origins filling in on Mike's Music Box! All this and more! Other music from: The American Hotel System and Best Not Broken #catchingrisingstars #thebalconyshowrocks #TheNewRealm #indiemusicsupport #internetradioshow #LikeFollowShare

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Gated Attention Blocks: Preliminary Progress toward Removing Attention Head Superposition, published by cmathw on April 9, 2024 on LessWrong. This work represents progress on removing attention head superposition. We are excited by this approach but acknowledge there are currently various limitations. In the short term, we will be working on adjacent problems are excited to collaborate with anyone thinking about similar things! Produced as part of the ML Alignment & Theory Scholars Program - Summer 2023 Cohort Summary: In transformer language models, attention head superposition makes it difficult to study the function of individual attention heads in isolation. We study a particular kind of attention head superposition that involves constructive and destructive interference between the outputs of different attention heads. We propose a novel architecture - a 'gated attention block' - which resolves this kind of attention head superposition in toy models. In future, we hope this architecture may be useful for studying more natural forms of attention head superposition in large language models. Our code can be found here. Background Mechanistic interpretability aims to reverse-engineer what neural networks have learned by decomposing a network's functions into human-interpretable algorithms. This involves isolating the individual components within the network that implement particular behaviours. This has proven difficult, however, because networks make use of polysemanticity and superposition to represent information. Polysemanticity in a transformer's multi-layer perceptron (MLPs) layers is when neurons appear to represent many unrelated concepts (Gurnee et al., 2023). We also see this phenomena within the transformer's attention mechanism, when a given attention head performs qualitatively different functions based on its destination token and context (Janiak et al., 2023). Superposition occurs when a layer in a network (an 'activation space') represents more features than it has dimensions. This means that features are assigned to an overcomplete set of directions as opposed to being aligned with e.g. the neuron basis. The presence of polysemanticity means that the function of a single neuron or attention head cannot be defined by the features or behaviours it expresses on a subset of its training distribution because it may serve different purposes on different subsets of the training distribution. Relatedly, superposition makes it misleading to study the function of individual neurons or attention heads in isolation from other neurons or heads. Both of these phenomena promote caution around assigning specific behaviours to individual network components (neurons or attention heads), due to there both being a diversity in behaviours across a training distribution and in their interaction with other components in the network. Although polysemanticity and superposition make the isolated components of a network less immediately interpretable, understanding of the correct functional units of analysis has improved. Progress has been made on both understanding features as directions within an activation space (Elhage et al., 2023) and resolving feature superposition by applying sparse autoencoders to identify highly-interpretable features (Sharkey et al., 2022; Cunningham et al., 2023; Bricken et al., 2023). Attention head superposition for OV-Incoherent Skip Trigrams Superposition in the context of attention heads is less understood. It is however conceivable that an attention block could make use of a similar compression scheme to implement more behaviours than the number of attention heads in the block. Prior work introduced a task to study attention head superposition in the form of OV-Incoherent Skip Trigrams (Jermyn et al., 2023; Conerly et al., 2023). These are s...

Hello guys! Welcome back to episode 98. Thank you for joining me. Come and follow me on insta @empowerstate and join our free private Empower State Community on FB. This week I am indulging the science geek in me diving deep into a couple of Quantum Physics experiments which will help you understand a phenomenon called Superposition in relation to manifestation and your power to choose your outcome. I mentioned a video in the pod and said I would link it so here it is. It's about the Double Slit Experiment. Go and watch it, it's wild (I had to watch it about 5 times when I first found it to let it properly sink in why this was so amazing ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9tKncAdlHQAnd here is another about the second hypothetical experiment, Schrodinger's cat ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjaAxUO6-UwSo my main message this week is that all possibilities are happening simultaneously and he outcome is decided by YOU through your intention, attention and belief. Hope you enjoy this episode, let me know what you think! Love Soph xxxSupport the show

Had so much fun chatting with my good friends Trenton Bricken and Sholto Douglas on the podcast.No way to summarize it, except: This is the best context dump out there on how LLMs are trained, what capabilities they're likely to soon have, and what exactly is going on inside them.You would be shocked how much of what I know about this field, I've learned just from talking with them.To the extent that you've enjoyed my other AI interviews, now you know why.So excited to put this out. Enjoy! I certainly did :)Watch on YouTube. Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or any other podcast platform. There's a transcript with links to all the papers the boys were throwing down - may help you follow along.Follow Trenton and Sholto on Twitter.Timestamps(00:00:00) - Long contexts(00:16:12) - Intelligence is just associations(00:32:35) - Intelligence explosion & great researchers(01:06:52) - Superposition & secret communication(01:22:34) - Agents & true reasoning(01:34:40) - How Sholto & Trenton got into AI research(02:07:16) - Are feature spaces the wrong way to think about intelligence?(02:21:12) - Will interp actually work on superhuman models(02:45:05) - Sholto's technical challenge for the audience(03:03:57) - Rapid fire Get full access to Dwarkesh Podcast at www.dwarkeshpatel.com/subscribe

Ever feel like your life's undergoing a metamorphosis? We get it. That's why we're inviting you to flutter along with us on a new journey, one that's captured our transformation into a spectacular video podcast. We're spreading our wings, and we want you to be part of this elevated flight, where we examine the innate instincts that guide us and the collective energy that propels us forward. It's not just about change; it's about the exhilaration of discovering our full potential and the unity we feel when we come together in joy and purpose.Our latest conversation takes a heartfelt turn as we share moments that have shaped us, like the dedication of a song from the amazing Matt Maher that brought home the value of personal connections. We celebrate the quirks that set us apart, diving into the world of left-handers and the beauty of embracing our individuality—Sara's supposed autism included. It's about cherishing those unique traits that make our interactions rich and life all the more colorful. So, join us as we toast to the peculiarities that make us who we are.Then, buckle up as we navigate from the music industry to the wild relationships in Borneo's rainforests and the perplexing appearances of monoliths worldwide. We discuss how nature's odd couples and these enigmatic structures stir our curiosity and wonder. Add to that a foray into the realms of quantum physics and spirituality with Dr. Diana Pasolka, and you're in for an episode that not only tickles the brain but touches the soul. We're here to celebrate the courage to express ourselves, and we share stories of overcoming the paralysis of judgment, finding freedom in authenticity. Tune in, and let's explore this fascinating tapestry of life together.Support the showVisit us on the Interwebs! Follow us on Instagram and Facebook! Support the show!

durée : 00:04:24 - 107. Superposition de 2 Préludes par le Duo Presque Classique (2023) -

YouTube link https://youtu.be/1ZpGCQoL2Rk Scott Aaronson joins us to explore quantum computing, complexity theory, Ai, superdeterminism, consciousness, and free will. TIMESTAMPS:- 00:00:00 Introduction- 00:02:27 Turing universality & computational efficiency- 00:12:35 Does prediction undermine free will?- 00:15:16 Newcomb's paradox- 00:23:05 Quantum information & no-cloning- 00:33:42 Chaos & computational irreducibility- 00:38:33 Brain duplication, Ai, & identity- 00:46:43 Many-worlds, Copenhagen, & Bohm's interpretation  - 01:03:14 Penrose's view on quantum gravity and consciousness- 01:14:46 Superposition explained: misconceptions of quantum computing  - 01:21:33 Wolfram's physics project critique- 01:31:37 P vs NP explained (complexity classes demystified)- 01:53:40 Classical vs quantum computation- 02:03:25 The "pretty hard" problem of consciousness (critiques of IIT) NOTE: The perspectives expressed by guests don't necessarily mirror my own. There's a versicolored arrangement of people on TOE, each harboring distinct viewpoints, as part of my endeavor to understand the perspectives that exist. THANK YOU: To Mike Duffy, of https://dailymystic.org for your insight, help, and recommendations on this channel.   - Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!)- Crypto: https://tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE- PayPal: https://tinyurl.com/paypalTOE- Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt- Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs- iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal/id1521758802- Pandora: https://pdora.co/33b9lfP- Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e- Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: https://reddit.com/r/theoriesofeverything- TOE Merch: https://tinyurl.com/TOEmerch LINKS MENTIONED:- Scott's Blog: https://scottaaronson.blog/- Newcomb's Paradox (Scott's Blog Post): https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=30- A New Kind of Science (Stephen Wolfram): https://amzn.to/47BTiaf- Jonathan Gorard's Papers: https://arxiv.org/search/gr-qc?searchtype=author&query=Gorard,+J- Boson Sampling (Alex Arkhipov and Scott Aaronson): https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.3245- Podcast w/ Tim Maudlin on TOE (Solo): https://youtu.be/fU1bs5o3nss- Podcast w/ Tim Palmer on TOE: https://youtu.be/883R3JlZHXE

Neu-Romancer - “Superposition” from the 2023 EP Neue Romantika on Fleisch. Neu-Romancer is the solo venture of Australian musician Laura Bailey, currently residing in Berlin, Germany. (She's also the bassist for VV & the Void, Ciern, and in the live line-up for Zanias.)  Her debut EP Neue Romantika features four tracks of Italo-disco-infused coldwave. "Neue Romantika" translates to "New Romantics" in German, a nod to the '70s/'80s music genre that included bands like Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark and Soft Cell. Today's Song of the Day recalls early Depeche Mode classics with its dark, danceable rhythm. Read the full story at KEXP.orgSupport the show: https://www.kexp.org/donateSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.