Podcasts about TFP

Dr. Kenneth Levy discusses how every therapist should at least be aware of multiple treatments for Borderline Personality Disorder, DBT, TFP, and so on. They don't need to practice them all, but they should know about them.

 Our guest on the podcast today is Dan Haylett, who's the author of a new book called The Retirement You Didn't See Coming. Dan is a financial planner and head of growth for TFP Financial Planning based in the UK. Dan focuses on financial planning, retirement planning, and life planning for people over age 50. He also hosts a podcast called Humans vs. Retirement that is centered on the behavioral aspects of retirement. Prior to joining TFP, Dan occupied several positions in the asset management industry. Dan, welcome back to The Long View.BackgroundBioHumans vs. Retirement podcastThe Retirement You Didn't See Coming: The Guide to the Human Side of Retirement Nobody Warns You AboutTFP Financial Planning“Dan Haylett: Retirement Planning = Life Planning,” The Long View podcast, Morningstar.com, Dec. 5, 2023.Retirement and Happiness“Can You Afford to Retire?—3 Questions to Ask Yourself!” Humans vs. Retirement video, youtube.com, June 2025.“The Fragile Decade: Retirement's Danger Zone,” by Dan Haylett, humansvsretirement.com, June 30, 2025.“Your Brain Has Two Sides. Retirement Needs Both,” by Dan Haylett, linkedin.com, October 2025.“A Plan for Your First 12 Months in Retirement,” Humans vs. Retirement video, youtube.com, 2024.“Few and Deep: The Retirement Lens That Changes Everything,” by Dan Haylett, humansvsretirement.com, Sept. 9, 2025.“Why Retirement Can Feel More Like a Void Than a Victory,” by Dan Haylett, humansvsretirement.com, March 28, 2025.“The Best Things in Retirement Aren't Things at All,” by Dan Haylett, humansvsretirement.com, Feb. 6, 2025.“Don't Let the Fear of the Future Steal Your Retirement Joy,” by Dan Haylett, humansvsretirement.com, Jan. 14, 2025.“Longevity and Brevity: The Two BIGGEST Risks in Retirement,” by Dan Haylett, humansvsretirement.com, Sept. 3, 2024.OtherMichael Finke Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In this episode of the Leading Voices in Food podcast, host Norbert Wilson is joined by food and nutrition policy economists Will Masters and Parke Wilde from Tufts University's Friedman School of Nutrition, Science and Policy. The discussion centers around the concept of the least cost diet, a tool used to determine the minimum cost required to maintain a nutritionally adequate diet. The conversation delves into the global computational methods and policies related to least cost diets, the challenges of making these diets culturally relevant, and the implications for food policy in both the US and internationally. You will also hear about the lived experiences of people affected by these diets and the need for more comprehensive research to better reflect reality. Interview Summary I know you both have been working in this space around least cost diets for a while. So, let's really start off by just asking a question about what brought you into this work as researchers. Why study least cost diets? Will, let's start with you. I'm a very curious person and this was a puzzle. So, you know, people want health. They want healthy food. Of course, we spend a lot on healthcare and health services, but do seek health in our food. As a child growing up, you know, companies were marketing food as a source of health. And people who had more money would spend more for premium items that were seen as healthy. And in the 2010s for the first time, we had these quantified definitions of what a healthy diet was as we went from 'nutrients' to 'food groups,' from the original dietary guidelines pyramid to the MyPlate. And then internationally, the very first quantified definitions of healthful diets that would work anywhere in the world. And I was like, oh, wow. Is it actually expensive to eat a healthy diet? And how much does it cost? How does it differ by place location? How does it differ over time, seasons, and years? And I just thought it was a fascinating question. Great, thank you for that. Parke? There's a lot of policy importance on this, but part of the fun also of this particular topic is more than almost any that we work on, it's connected to things that we have to think about in our daily lives. So, as you're preparing and purchasing food for your family and you want it to be a healthy. And you want it to still be, you know, tasty enough to satisfy the kids. And it can't take too long because it has to fit into a busy life. So, this one does feel like it's got a personal connection. Thank you both for that. One of the things I heard is there was an availability of data. There was an opportunity that seems like it didn't exist before. Can you speak a little bit about that? Especially Will because you mentioned that point. Will: Yes. So, we have had food composition data identifying for typical items. A can of beans, or even a pizza. You know, what is the expected, on average quantity of each nutrient. But only recently have we had those on a very large scale for global items. Hundreds and hundreds of thousands of distinct items. And we had nutrient requirements, but only nutrient by nutrient, and the definition of a food group where you would want not only the nutrients, but also the phytochemicals, the attributes of food from its food matrix that make a vegetable different from just in a vitamin pill. And those came about in, as I mentioned, in the 2010s. And then there's the computational tools and the price observations that get captured. They've been written down on pads of paper, literally, and brought to a headquarters to compute inflation since the 1930s. But access to those in digitized form, only really in the 2000s and only really in the 2010s were we able to have program routines that would download millions and millions of price observations, match them to food composition data, match that food composition information to a healthy diet criterion, and then compute these least cost diets. Now we've computed millions and millions of these thanks to modern computing and all of that data. Great, Will. And you've already started on this, so let's continue on this point. You were talking about some of the computational methods and data that were available globally. Can you give us a good sense of what does a lease cost diet look like from this global perspective because we're going to talk to Parke about whether it is in the US. But let's talk about it in the broad sense globally. In my case the funding opportunity to pay for the graduate students and collaborators internationally came from the Gates Foundation and the UK International Development Agency, initially for a pilot study in Ghana and Tanzania. And then we were able to get more money to scale that up to Africa and South Asia, and then globally through a project called Food Prices for Nutrition. And what we found, first of all, is that to get agreement on what a healthy diet means, we needed to go to something like the least common denominator. The most basic, basic definition from the commonalities among national governments' dietary guidelines. So, in the US, that's MyPlate, or in the UK it's the Eat Well Guide. And each country's dietary guidelines look a little different, but they have these commonalities. So, we distilled that down to six food groups. There's fruits and vegetables, separately. And then there's animal source foods altogether. And in some countries they would separate out milk, like the United States does. And then all starchy staples together. And in some countries, you would separate out whole grains like the US does. And then all edible oils. And those six food groups, in the quantities needed to provide all the nutrients you would need, plus these attributes of food groups beyond just what's in a vitamin pill, turns out to cost about $4 a day. And if you adjust for inflation and differences in the cost of living, the price of housing and so forth around the world, it's very similar. And if you think about seasonal variation in a very remote area, it might rise by 50% in a really bad situation. And if you think about a very remote location where it's difficult to get food to, it might go up to $5.50, but it stays in that range between roughly speaking $2.50 and $5.00. Meanwhile, incomes are varying from around $1.00 a day, and people who cannot possibly afford those more expensive food groups, to $200 a day in which these least expensive items are trivially small in cost compared to the issues that Parke mentioned. We can also talk about what we actually find as the items, and those vary a lot from place to place for some food groups and are very similar to each other in other food groups. So, for example, the least expensive item in an animal source food category is very often dairy in a rich country. But in a really dry, poor country it's dried fish because refrigeration and transport are very expensive. And then to see where there's commonalities in the vegetable category, boy. Onions, tomatoes, carrots are so inexpensive around the world. We've just gotten those supply chains to make the basic ingredients for a vegetable stew really low cost. But then there's all these other different vegetables that are usually more expensive. So, it's very interesting to look at which are the items that would deliver the healthfulness you need and how much they cost. It's surprisingly little from a rich country perspective, and yet still out of reach for so many in low-income countries. Will, thank you for that. And I want to turn now to looking in the US case because I think there's some important commonalities. Parke, can you describe the least cost diet, how it's used here in the US, and its implications for policy? Absolutely. And full disclosure to your audience, this is work on which we've benefited from Norbert's input and wisdom in a way that's been very valuable as a co-author and as an advisor for the quantitative part of what we were doing. For an article in the journal Food Policy, we use the same type of mathematical model that USDA uses when it sets the Thrifty Food Plan, the TFP. A hypothetical diet that's used as the benchmark for the maximum benefit in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which is the nation's most important anti-hunger program. And what USDA does with this model diet is it tries to find a hypothetical bundle of foods and beverages that's not too different from what people ordinarily consume. The idea is it should be a familiar diet, it should be one that's reasonably tasty, that people clearly already accept enough. But it can't be exactly that diet. It has to be different enough at least to meet a cost target and to meet a whole long list of nutrition criteria. Including getting enough of the particular nutrients, things like enough calcium or enough protein, and also, matching food group goals reasonably well. Things like having enough fruits, enough vegetables, enough dairy. When, USDA does that, it finds that it's fairly difficult. It's fairly difficult to meet all those goals at once, at a cost and a cost goal all at the same time. And so, it ends up choosing this hypothetical diet that's almost maybe more different than would feel most comfortable from people's typical average consumption. Thank you, Parke. I'm interested to understand the policy implications of this least cost diet. You suggested something about the Thrifty Food Plan and the maximum benefit levels. Can you tell us a little bit more about the policies that are relevant? Yes, so the Thrifty Food Plan update that USDA does every five years has a much bigger policy importance now than it did a few years ago. I used to tell my students that you shouldn't overstate how much policy importance this update has. It might matter a little bit less than you would think. And the reason was because every time they update the Thrifty Food Plan, they use the cost target that is the inflation adjusted or the real cost of the previous edition. It's a little bit as if nobody wanted to open up the whole can of worms about what should the SNAP benefit be in the first place. But everything changed with the update in 2021. In 2021, researchers at the US Department of Agriculture found that it was not possible at the old cost target to find a diet that met all of the nutrition criteria - at all. Even if you were willing to have a diet that was quite different from people's typical consumption. And so, they ended up increasing the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan in small increments until they found a solution to this mathematical model using data on real world prices and on the nutrition characteristics of these foods. And this led to a 21% increase in the permanent value of the maximum SNAP benefit. Many people didn't notice that increase all that much because the increase came into effect at just about the same time that a temporary boost during the COVID era to SNAP benefits was being taken away. So there had been a temporary boost to how much benefits people got as that was taken away at the end of the start of the COVID pandemic then this permanent increase came in and it kind of softened the blow from that change in benefits at that time. But it now ends up meaning that the SNAP benefit is substantially higher than it would've been without this 2021 increase. And there's a lot of policy attention on this in the current Congress and in the current administration. There's perhaps a skeptical eye on whether this increase was good policy. And so, there are proposals to essentially take away the ability to update the Thrifty Food Plan change the maximum SNAP benefit automatically, as it used to. As you know, Norbert, this is part of all sorts of things going on currently. Like we heard in the news, just last week, about plans to end collecting household food security measurement using a major national survey. And so there will be sort of possibly less information about how these programs are doing and whether a certain SNAP benefit is needed in order to protect people from food insecurity and hunger. Parke, this is really important and I'm grateful that we're able to talk about this today in that SNAP benefit levels are still determined by this mathematical program that's supposed to represent a nutritionally adequate diet that also reflects food preferences. And I don't know how many people really understand or appreciate that. I can say I didn't understand or appreciate it until working more in this project. I think it's critical for our listeners to understand just how important this particular mathematical model is, and what it says about what a nutritionally adequate diet looks like in this country. I know the US is one of the countries that uses a model diet like this to help set policy. Will, I'd like to turn to you to see what ways other nations are using this sort of model diet. How have you seen policy receive information from these model diets? It's been a remarkable thing where those initial computational papers that we were able to publish in first in 2018, '19, '20, and governments asking how could we use this in practice. Parke has laid out how it's used in the US with regard to the benefit level of SNAP. The US Thrifty Food Plan has many constraints in addition to the basic ones for the Healthy Diet Basket that I described. Because clearly that Healthy Diet Basket minimum is not something anyone in America would think is acceptable. Just to have milk and frozen vegetables and low-cost bread, that jar peanut butter and that's it. Like that would be clearly not okay. So, internationally what's happened is that first starting in 2020, and then using the current formula in 2022, the United Nations agencies together with the World Bank have done global monitoring of food and nutrition security using this method. So, the least cost items to meet the Healthy Diet Basket in each country provide this global estimate that about a third of the global population have income available for food after taking account of their non-food needs. That is insufficient to buy this healthy diet. What they're actually eating is just starchy staples, oil, some calories from low-cost sugar and that's it. And very small quantities of the fruits and vegetables. And animal source foods are the expensive ones. So, countries have the opportunity to begin calculating this themselves alongside their normal monitoring of inflation with a consumer price index. The first country to do that was Nigeria. And Nigeria began publishing this in January 2024. And it so happened that the country's national minimum wage for civil servants was up for debate at that time. And this was a newly published statistic that turned out to be enormously important for the civil society advocates and the labor unions who were trying to explain why a higher civil service minimum wage was needed. This is for the people who are serving tea or the drivers and the low wage people in these government service agencies. And able to measure how many household members could you feed a healthy diet with a day's worth of the monthly wage. So social protection in the sense of minimum wage and then used in other countries regarding something like our US SNAP program or something like our US WIC program. And trying to define how big should those benefit levels be. That's been the first use. A second use that's emerging is targeting the supply chains for the low-cost vegetables and animal source foods and asking what from experience elsewhere could be an inexpensive animal source food. What could be the most inexpensive fruits. What could be the most inexpensive vegetables? And that is the type of work that we're doing now with governments with continued funding from the Gates Foundation and the UK International Development Agency. Will, it's fascinating to hear this example from Nigeria where all of the work that you all have been doing sort of shows up in this kind of debate. And it really speaks to the power of the research that we all are trying to do as we try to inform policy. Now, as we discussed the least cost diet, there was something that I heard from both of you. Are these diets that people really want? I'm interested to understand a little bit more about that because this is a really critical space.Will, what do we know about the lived experiences of those affected by least cost diet policy implementation. How are real people affected? It's such an important and interesting question, just out of curiosity, but also for just our human understanding of what life is like for people. And then of course the policy actions that could improve. So, to be clear, we've only had these millions of least cost diets, these benchmark 'access to' at a market near you. These are open markets that might be happening twice a week or sometimes all seven days of the week in a small town, in an African country or a urban bodega type market or a supermarket across Asia, Africa. We've only begun to have these benchmarks against which to compare actual food choice, as I mentioned, since 2022. And then really only since 2024 have been able to investigate this question. We're only beginning to match up these benchmark diets to what people actually choose. But the pattern we're seeing is that in low and lower middle-income countries, people definitely spend their money to go towards that healthy diet basket goal. They don't spend all of their additional money on that. But if you improve affordability throughout the range of country incomes - from the lowest income countries in Africa, Mali, Senegal, Burkina Faso, to middle income countries in Africa, like Ghana, Indonesia, an upper middle-income country - people do spend their money to get more animal source foods, more fruits and vegetables, and to reduce the amount of the low cost starchy staples. They do increase the amount of discretionary, sugary meals. And a lot of what they're eating exits the healthy diet basket because there's too much added sodium, too much added sugar. And so, things that would've been healthy become unhealthy because of processing or in a restaurant setting. So, people do spend their money on that. But they are moving towards a healthy diet. That breaks down somewhere in the upper income and high-income countries where additional spending becomes very little correlated with the Healthy Diet Basket. What happens is people way overshoot the Healthy Diet Basket targets for animal source foods and for edible oils because I don't know if you've ever tried it, but one really delicious thing is fried meat. People love it. And even low middle income people overshoot on that. And that displaces the other elements of a healthy diet. And then there's a lot of upgrading, if you will, within the food group. So, people are spending additional money on nicer vegetables. Nicer fruits. Nicer animal source foods without increasing the total amount of them in addition to having overshot the healthy diet levels of many of those food groups. Which of course takes away from the food you would need from the fruits, the vegetables, and the pulses, nuts and seeds, that almost no one gets as much as is considered healthy, of that pulses, nuts and seeds category. Thank you. And I want to shift this to the US example. So, Parke, can you tell us a bit more about the lived experience of those affected by least cost diet policy? How are real people affected? One of the things I've enjoyed about this project that you and I got to work on, Norbert, in cooperation with other colleagues, is that it had both a quantitative and a qualitative part to it. Now, our colleague Sarah Folta led some of the qualitative interviews, sort of real interviews with people in food pantries in four states around the country. And this was published recently in the Journal of Health Education and Behavior. And we asked people about their goals and about what are the different difficulties or constraints that keep them from achieving those goals. And what came out of that was that people often talk about whether their budget constraints and whether their financial difficulties take away their autonomy to sort of be in charge of their own food choices. And this was something that Sarah emphasized as she sort of helped lead us through a process of digesting what was the key findings from these interviews with people. One of the things I liked about doing this study is that because the quantitative and the qualitative part, each had this characteristic of being about what do people want to achieve. This showed up mathematically in the constrained optimization model, but it also showed up in the conversations with people in the food pantry. And what are the constraints that keep people from achieving it. You know, the mathematical model, these are things like all the nutrition constraints and the cost constraints. And then in the real conversations, it's something that people raise in very plain language about what are all the difficulties they have. Either in satisfying their own nutrition aspirations or satisfying some of the requirements for one person or another in the family. Like if people have special diets that are needed or if they have to be gluten free or any number of things. Having the diets be culturally appropriate. And so, I feel like this is one of those classic things where different disciplines have wisdom to bring to bear on what's really very much a shared topic. What I hear from both of you is that these diets, while they are computationally interesting and they reveal some critical realities of how people eat, they can't cover everything. People want to eat certain types of foods. Certain types of foods are more culturally relevant. And that's really clear talking to you, Will, about just sort of the range of foods that end up showing up in these least cost diets and how you were having to make some adjustments there. Parke, as you talked about the work with Sarah Folta thinking through autonomy and sort of a sense of self. This kind of leads us to a question that I want to open up to both of you. What's missing when we talk about these least cost diet modeling exercises and what are the policy implications of that? What are the gaps in our understanding of these model diets and what needs to happen to make them reflect reality better? Parke? Well, you know, there's many things that people in our research community are working on. And it goes quite, quite far afield. But I'm just thinking of two related to our quantitative research using the Thrifty Food Plan type models. We've been working with Yiwen Zhao and Linlin Fan at Penn State University on how these models would work if you relaxed some of the constraints. If people's back in a financial sense weren't back up against the wall, but instead they had just a little more space. We were considering what if they had incentives that gave them a discount on fruits and vegetables, for example, through the SNAP program? Or what if they had a healthy bundle of foods provided through the emergency food system, through food banks or food pantries. What is the effect directly in terms of those foods? But also, what is the effect in terms of just relaxing their budget constraints. They get to have a little more of the foods that they find more preferred or that they had been going without. But then also, in terms of sort of your question about the more personal. You know, what is people's personal relationships with food? How does this play out on the ground? We're working with the graduate student Angelica Valdez Valderrama here at the Friedman School, thinking about what some of the cultural assumptions and of the food group constraints in some of these models are. If you sort of came from a different immigrant tradition or if you came from another community, what things would be different in, for example, decisions about what's called the Mediterranean diet or what's called the healthy US style dietary pattern. How much difference do this sort of breadth, cultural breadth of dietary patterns you could consider, how much difference does that make in terms of what's the outcome of this type of hypothetical diet? Will: And I think, you know, from the global perspective, one really interesting thing is when we do combine data sets and look across these very different cultural settings, dry land, Sahelian Africa versus countries that are coastal versus sort of forest inland countries versus all across Asia, south Asia to East Asia, all across Latin America. We do see the role of these cultural factors. And we see them playing out in very systematic ways that people come to their cultural norms for very good reasons. And then pivot and switch away to new cultural norms. You know, American fast food, for example, switching from beef primarily to chicken primarily. That sort of thing becomes very visible in a matter of years. So, in terms of things that are frontiers for us, remember this is early days. Getting many more nutritionists, people in other fields, looking at first of all, it's just what is really needed for health. Getting those health requirements improved and understood better is a key priority. Our Healthy Diet Basket comes from the work of a nutritionist named Anna Herforth, who has gone around the world studying these dietary guidelines internationally. We're about to get the Eat Lancet dietary recommendations announced, and it'll be very interesting to see how those evolve. Second thing is much better data on prices and computing these diets for more different settings at different times, different locations. Settings that are inner city United States versus very rural. And then this question of comparing to actual diets. And just trying to understand what people are seeking when they choose foods that are clearly not these benchmark least cost items. The purpose is to ask how far away and why and how are they far away? And particularly to understand to what degree are these attributes of the foods themselves: the convenience of the packaging, the preparation of the item, the taste, the flavor, the cultural significance of it. To what degree are we looking at the result of aspirations that are really shaped by marketing. Are really shaped by the fire hose of persuasion that companies are investing in every day. And very strategically and constantly iterating to the best possible spokesperson, the best possible ad campaign. Combining billboards and radio and television such that you're surrounded by this. And when you drive down the street and when you walk into the supermarket, there is no greater effort on the planet than the effort to sell us a particular brand of food. Food companies are basically marketing companies attached to a manufacturing facility, and they are spending much more than the entire combined budget of the NIH and CDC, et cetera, to persuade us to eat what we ultimately choose. And we really don't know to what degree it's the actual factors in the food itself versus the marketing campaigns and the way they've evolved. You know, if you had a choice between taking the food system and regulating it the way we regulate, say housing or vehicles. If we were to say your supermarket should be like an auto dealership, right? So, anything in the auto dealership is very heavily regulated. Everything from the paint to where the gear shift is to how the windows work. Everything is heavily regulated because the auto industry has worked with National Transportation Safety Board and every single crash investigation, et cetera, has led to the standards that we have now. We didn't get taxes on cars without airbags to make us choose cars with airbags. They're just required. And same is true for housing, right? You can't just build, you know, an extension deck behind your house any way you want. A city inspector will force you to tear it out if you haven't built it to code. So, you know, we could regulate the grocery store like we do that. It's not going to happen politically but compare that option to treating groceries the way we used to treat the legal services or pharmaceuticals. Which is you couldn't advertise them. You could sell them, and people would choose based on the actual merit of the lawyer or the pharmaceutical, right? Which would have the bigger impact. Right? If there was zero food advertising, you just walked into the grocery store and chose what you liked. Or you regulate the grocery store the same way we regulate automotive or building trades. Obviously, they both matter. There's, you know, this problem that you can't see, taste or smell the healthiness of food. You're always acting on belief and not a fact when you choose something that you're seeking health. We don't know to what extent choice is distorted away from a low-cost healthy diet by things people genuinely want and need. Such as taste, convenience, culture, and so forth. Versus things that they've been persuaded to want. And there's obviously some of both. All of these things matter. But I'm hopeful that through these least cost diets, we can identify that low-cost options are there. And you could feed your family a very healthy diet at the Thrifty Food Plan level in the United States, or even lower. It would take time, it would take attention, it would be hard. You can take some shortcuts to make that within your time budget, right? And the planning budget. And we can identify what those look like thanks to these model diets. It's a very exciting area of work, but we still have a lot to do to define carefully what are the constraints. What are the real objectives here. And how to go about helping people, acquire these foods that we now know are there within a short commuting distance. You may need to take the bus, you may need carpool. But that's what people actually do to go grocery shopping. And when they get there, we can help people to choose items that would genuinely meet their needs at lower cost. Bios Will Masters is a Professor in the Friedman School of Nutrition, with a secondary appointment in Tufts University's Department of Economics. He is coauthor of the new textbook on Food Economics: Agriculture, Nutrition and Health (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024). Before coming to Tufts in 2010 he was a faculty member in Agricultural Economics at Purdue University (1991-2010), and also at the University of Zimbabwe (1989-90), Harvard's Kennedy School of Government (2000) and Columbia University (2003-04). He is former editor-in-chief of the journal Agricultural Economics (2006-2011), and an elected Fellow of the American Society for Nutrition (FASN) as well as a Fellow of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA). At Tufts his courses on economics of agriculture, food and nutrition were recognized with student-nominated, University-wide teaching awards in 2019 and 2022, and he leads over a million dollars annually in externally funded research including work on the Agriculture, Nutrition and Health Academy (https://www.anh-academy.org), as well as projects supporting government efforts to calculate the cost and affordability of healthy diets worldwide and work with private enterprises on data analytics for food markets in Africa. Parke Wilde (PhD, Cornell) is a food economist and professor at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. Previously, he worked for USDA's Economic Research Service. At Tufts, Parke teaches graduate-level courses in statistics, U.S. food policy, and climate change. His research addresses the economics of U.S. food and nutrition policy, including federal nutrition assistance programs. He was Director of Design for the SNAP Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP) evaluation. He has been a member of the National Academy of Medicine's Food Forum and is on the scientific and technical advisory committee for Menus of Change, an initiative to advance the health and sustainability of the restaurant industry. He directs the USDA-funded Research Innovation and Development Grants in Economics (RIDGE) Partnership. He received the AAEA Distinguished Quality of Communication Award for his textbook, Food Policy in the United States: An Introduction (Routledge/Earthscan), whose third edition was released in April 2025. 

In today's episode the TFP crew talks Erik Bischoff's comments about the recent hikes in WWE prices and sadly they agree with him.......we also get into Round Table of Topics, You Just Made the List and the past weeks episodes!!! CHEERS!!!JERKING THE CURTAINROUND TABLE OF TOPICSNEWSWWE getting lazy??? Wrestlemania poster giving spoilersLilian Garcia signs extension with WWE Who are the cryptic videos of???Mike Rotunda aka IRS enters hospice “You Just Made the List” Top 5 current NXT superstars (females)SMACKDOWN Cody kicks off the show, only to be cut short by Drew and his story Who attacked Fatu???Is the WWE giving more mixed tag matches due to the cuts in hours???The Discount Diva is still taking applications Giulia vs Stratton makes good business Is a heel turn for Jade good for business???Dragunov is just fun to watch How are we feeling with Blacks new intro with Zelina??? Drew is under Cody's skin, great match between him and JimmyHalloween HavocJe'Von and Leon Slater vs Mr Iguana and La Parka was a grrrrreat match Ethan Page retains Blake Monroe defeats Zaria……what's next???Dark State and Hardy Boyz give a great match Ricky Saints retains We have a new woman's champion…….whats next for Tatum???RAWJey and Punk kickoff RAW……Jey wins this round Ugh Judgement Day feeling more and more like a break up coming soon Penta and Rusev ends in DQ…..smelling a triple threat match coming Are we headed down an LA Knight turn???Perez gets her dream match, it was alright Jimmy setting Jet straight is good for business Bronn and LA Knight is great for business Charlotte, Alexa, Bayley and Lyra put on a banger 11/1 Saturday Nights Main EventEpisodes dropping weekly!!!Follow on the gram @the.funkaholiks.pod THEE POD THAT TALKS WHAT THEY LOVE 

(SPOILER) Today's episode begins with previewing Stefanie and Jackie on the pod, talking about eps 10 & 11 of Love is Blind, and also wanting some feedback on a podcast project I'm thinking about doing.  Then Stefanie and Jackie join me (10:06) to talk about having Theresa on their podcast last week before the Gerry news broke, getting an updated statement from Theresa, Kat Izzo joining them this week, TFP as the Bachelorette, and much, much more.  Music written by Jimmer Podrasky (B'Jingo Songs/Machia Music/Bug Music BMI) Ads: Factor Meals - 50% off your first box PLUS free shipping at https://factormeals.com/realitysteve50off Promo Code: realitysteve50off Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In today's episode the TFP team is stumped!!! We cannot figure out any storyline and we like it.......Nando T brings up any interesting topic and the team answers the call by giving a story that WWE needs to pick up.......we're just saying, it's that good!!! Round table of topics, show breakdowns and everyone's favorite segment......You Just Made the List!!! CHEERS!!!JERKING THE CURTAINROUND TABLE OF TOPICSNEWSTNA Bound 4 Glory highlights Roster shake up…..again Wes Lee being the biggest name Ridge Holland announces his release from WWEIs Matt Cardona with NXT???“You Just Made the List” Top 5 Babyfaces (male)SMACKDOWN Cody kicks off Smackdown and the confidence is seeping through his suit Seth Rollins is NOT a wanker Perth

She's backkkk! After a 5-month break, I'm finally sitting down to catch up with you all.. and it feels SO good. In this episode, I'm giving you some life updates (a lot has happened since we last talked), plus diving into some pop culture chats because duh… what's life without a little Bachelor gossip and Dancing With the Stars hot takes? This episode feels like sitting on the couch with your girlfriends - coffee in hand, messy bun, and plenty of laughs. I'm so excited to hang out with you again and bring this podcast back to life.   ♡ JOIN MY CHALLENGE: https://desbfittraining.com/foundations ♡BFIT PROGRAMS +: free 5 day trial to my membership: https://www.desbfittraining.com  ♡ WORK WITH DBFT 1-1: https://dbftllc.typeform.com/COACHDBFT  ♡ Join BetterHelp today - https://bit.ly/betterhelpbrunch  code “desb” for 10% off your first month! #ad #sponsored   TIME STAMPS: (2:45) where I've been (9:30) half failure (12:00) pacifiergate (20:00) teamwork in parenting (22:20) elepVant in the room (33:45) BREAKUP SZN (37:00) TFP (46:00) FTFIF    ----   And remember, if you enjoyed today's episode, please subscribe, rate, and review the podcast. Your feedback helps me continue to bring you content you love.   SHOP HYDROJUG, code desb for 10% off: https://bit.ly/DESBhydrojug  SHOP BUFFBUNNY, code desb for 10% off: https://bit.ly/buffbunnyDESB  SHOP PTULA, code desb for 10% off: https://www.ptula.com/desb  SHOP VITALITY, code desb10 for 10% off: https://bit.ly/vitalitydesb  SHOP MY CURRENT OUTFITS: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/desb    leave me a voicemail: https://bit.ly/voicemail_bwd  tell me a secret/ask for advice: https://brunchwithdesb.com  MY SKINCARE AND MAKEUP: https://www.shopltk.com/explore/desb___  OPEN FACEBOOK FITNESS COMMUNITY: https://bit.ly/dbftcommunity_bwd  

Welcome back to The Viall Files: Reality Recap!  The Emmys were last night! Wohoo! And we're joined by Glambot extraordinaire Cole Walliser to get into everything red carpet related. Plus, the hilarious and amazing Liza Treyger returns to get into the latest RHOC and RHOM episodes, as well as help us get hyped for the new season of RHOSLC! Meanwhile, we gab about Dakota's comments surrounding TFP as the Bachelorette, the Love Is Blind Cast, SNL departures, and more!  “Fame is a disease” Subscribe to The ENVY Media Newsletter Today: https://www.viallfiles.com/newsletter  Listen to Humble Brag with Cynthia Bailey and Crystal Kung Minkoff. Available wherever you get your podcasts and YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@humblebragpod https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/humble-brag-with-crystal-and-cynthia/id1774286896 Start your 7 Day Free Trial of Viall Files + here: https://viallfiles.supportingcast.fm/  We've partnered with Mint Mobile to open a hot takes hotline to hear your scorching hot opinions! Give us your hot takes, thoughts and theories and we'll read and react to the best ones on an upcoming Reality Recap episode! All you have to do is call 1-855-MINT-TLK or, if you prefer the numbers, that's 1-855-646-8855 and leave us a message. Please make sure to subscribe so you don't miss an episode and as always send in your relationship questions to asknick@theviallfiles.com to be a part of our Monday episodes. Follow us on X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheViallFiles Listen To Disrespectfully now! Listen on Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/disrespectfully/id1516710301 Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0J6DW1KeDX6SpoVEuQpl7z?si=c35995a56b8d4038 Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCh8MqSsiGkfJcWhkan0D0w To Order Nick's Book Go To: http://www.viallfiles.com  If you would like to get some texting advice on Office Hours send an email to asknick@theviallfiles.com with “Texting Office Hours” in the subject line! To advertise on this podcast please email: ad-sales@libsyn.com or go to: https://advertising.libsyn.com/theviallfiles   THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS: BILT -  Earn points on rent and around your neighborhood, wherever you call home, by going to https://joinbilt.com/viall  Helix Sleep - For their Labor Day Sale Extended, go to https://helixsleep.com/viall for 25% Off Sitewide. Exclusive for listeners of The Viall Files Bombas - Head over to https://bombas.com/viall and use code viall for 20% off your first purchase. Cymbiotika - Go to https://cymbiotika.com/viall to get 20% off plus free shipping. Timestamps: (00:01) - Intro (01:48) - Household Headlines (20:54) - Cole Joins/Emmy Awards (37:27) - Liza Joins (01:20:45) - Outro Episode Socials: @viallfiles @nickviall @nnataliejjoy @glittercheese @colewalliser @ciaracrobinson @justinkaphillips @leahgsilberstein @dereklanerussell @the_mare_bare  

PaceCase and BachelorClues break down the shocking news that Taylor Frankie Paul has been cast as the next Bachelorette, making her the most famous lead in franchise history. They analyze what this unprecedented stunt casting means for the future of the game, from her social media dominance and controversial past to the franchise's pivot toward influencer leads. The hosts also cover the latest developments across reality dating TV, including the new Love Is Blind season 9 cast, the Love Island Games season 2 lineup, Nicolandria's red carpet debut at the VMAs, Huda's NFL partnership, and the fiery comment-section feud sparked by TFP's casting. Plus, they crown this week's top parasocial plays, celebrate a feline creature of the week, and descend into the pit with fresh screams from Bachelor Nation.__Join the Pit on Patreon for more exclusive content and shows! : / gameofroses__Want coaching tips? email gameofrozes@gmail.com__Follow us on TikTok: @gameofrosesFollow us on Instagram-Game of Roses: @gameofrosespodPacecase: @pacecaseBachelor Clues: @bachelorclues Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

It's great to reconnect with the guys from The Funeral Portrait. All the boys came by: singer Lee Jennings, guitarists Cody Weissinger and Caleb Freihaut, with bassist Robert Weston, and drummer Homer Umbanhower. Their album Greetings From Suffacate City is about to turn one on September 13th, and it's been a whirlwind year for the boys. From a tour with Five Finger Death Punch and Marilyn Manson, to this summer's tour with Ice Nine Kills. Before their show locally, they swung by the station to speak with me about everything TFP. You can watch the conversation in the link above. I met the guys for the first time last year as we visited Eloise Insane Asylum. You can hear the audio that was captured here. New Music From The Funeral Portrait "A little baby bit...we have less than a handful of stuff" was how Caleb described the progress on new music from the band. He said that they've been pounding the road so hard they haven't had a chance to start on anything new. "We have a small amount, but what we have is exciting." He went on to say it has to be bigger than "Greetings". Lee chimed in, "It has to be next-level because of the tours we've done." He said they're playing to so many new people each night that new fans are discovering the album. Working With Ivan Moody on "Holy Water The song 'Holy Water' was released as a single pre-COVID. When they went to re-release the song earlier this year, Ivan Moody from Five Finger Death Punch told the guys he wanted to be on the track. "It just so happens that Ivan liked the song. And he wanted to be on it. It was kind of a magical, weird moment of him being "I want to help this band out. I like them. They're cool, they're different, they're young." Kind of like a torch passing moment, and it just worked." The guys were nice enough to bring their guitars, so they busted out two songs for us. Their next single is "Dark Thoughts" and "Holy Water". They also talked about how welcoming the INK band and their fans have been to them. And get this, they're heading off on a European tour this fall. I want them to take me with them!! The boys have had an amazing year, and I wish them nothing but the best moving forward! I'm a fan!

The TFP crew is present and lively.......Arianna is on fire while Nando T and Jonathan stoke the flames!!! We've got some great discussions for you, wild ideas and so much more!!! CHEERS!!!JERKING THE CURTAINROUND TABLE OF TOPICSNEWSNaomi's big announcement and what happens nextWorlds Collide Sept. 12thWrestlePalooza Sept. 20thWWE options to purchase TNA “You Just Made the List” Top 5 Wrestling ManagersSMACKDOWN MFT kicks off smackdown Piper Niven is taking notes and passing the testsNia isn't wrong……but Tiffany and Nia againWWE helping Melo by giving him the Miz Kiana James recruitingIs Drew onto something???…..is Cody anything without his story???Tala Tonga vs Erick Rowan would be epic Motor City Squirt Guns…..how are we feeling about the tag teams since our last conversation Sami vs Solo move the needle???RAWThe World Heavyweight Champion kicks off Monday Night Rollins Jey can't control the crowd Was Asuka's apology sincere? Raquel and Iyo great choice for a match Asuka has mommy problems Which Bayley are we getting???Seth officially has become a nightmare for PunkCongratulations Naomi and Big Jim…..still too soon What an ending to RAW and the build up for Paris!!! NXTWhy Briggs???Saints next for Oba???TNA on NXT is good business When should Sol get a shot at the title??? Mike Santana with the assist Episodes dropping weekly!!!Follow on the gram @the.funkaholiks.pod THEE POD THAT TALKS WHAT THEY LOVE 

In 2018, Hala Taha launched the Young and Profiting podcast while still working her corporate job, laying the foundation for YAP Media. What began as a side hustle has grown into a top-ranked entrepreneurship podcast, a powerful personal brand, and a thriving podcast and social media agency. In this special 7 Years of YAP series, Hala joins Jamar Jones on The Foureva Podcast to share the exact strategies she used to turn a side hustle into a multi-million-dollar media business. In this episode, Jamar and Hala will discuss: (00:00) Introduction (03:23) Her Early Career at Hot 97 and Skill Stacking Edge (07:39) Using Social Proof to Land Influential Guests (10:48) Sales as the Engine of Entrepreneurship (12:38) Building and Scaling a High-Performance Team (20:02) YAP Media: From Side Hustle to 7-Figure Business (29:33) LinkedIn Growth Hacks for Entrepreneurs (36:08) Sales Strategies for Closing High-Value Clients (43:48) What's Next: Future Plans for Business Growth  Hala Taha is the host of Young and Profiting, a top 10 business and entrepreneurship podcast on Apple and Spotify. She's the founder and CEO of YAP Media, an award-winning social media and podcast agency, as well as the YAP Media Network, where she helps renowned podcasters like Jenna Kutcher, Neil Patel, and Russell Brunson grow and monetize their shows. With her business on track to hit eight figures in 2025, Hala stands out as a leading creator-entrepreneur. Sponsored By: Shopify - Start your $1/month trial at Shopify.com/profiting Indeed - Get a $75 sponsored job credit to boost your job's visibility at Indeed.com/PROFITING  OpenPhone - Get 20% off your first 6 months at OpenPhone.com/profiting Airbnb - Find a co-host at airbnb.com/host  Mercury - Streamline your banking and finances in one place. Learn more at ⁠⁠mercury.com/profiting⁠⁠  Policy Genius - Secure your family's future with Policygenius. Head to policygenius.com/profiting  Framer - Launch your site for free at Framer.com, and use code PROFITING Resources Mentioned: Hala's Podcast, Young and Profiting: bit.ly/_YAP-apple  Hala's Agency, YAP Media: yapmedia.com    The Foureva Podcast by Jamar Jones: bit.ly/TFP-apple   Change Your Circle, Change Your Life by Jamar Jones: bit.ly/ChangeCircle  Active Deals - youngandprofiting.com/deals  Key YAP Links Reviews - ratethispodcast.com/yap YouTube - youtube.com/c/YoungandProfiting LinkedIn - linkedin.com/in/htaha/ Instagram - instagram.com/yapwithhala/ Social + Podcast Services: yapmedia.com Transcripts - youngandprofiting.com/episodes-new  Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Podcast, Business, Business Podcast, Self Improvement, Self-Improvement, Personal Development, Starting a Business, Strategy, Investing, Sales, Selling, Psychology, Productivity, Entrepreneurs, AI, Artificial Intelligence, Technology, Marketing, Negotiation, Money, Finance, Side Hustle, Startup, Mental Health, Career, Leadership, Mindset, Health, Growth Mindset, Startup, Starting a Business, Passive Income, Online Business, Solopreneur

This week on the PayneCast:Tiaa updateTP in trouble over ticketWNBAHigh school football is here!TFP's Dynamite Dozen recapJonah Winton of Silverdale commits to Kennesaw State baseballRushmore of Sit Down Chain Restaurants Buy/SellBe sure you leave us a review and a rating. You can follow us on Spotify, Apple Podcast, YouTube, Facebook, & Instagram! Please send your comments, topics, and ideas to thepaynecast1@gmail.com.

Remote work productivity surged during the pandemic, with studies showing a strong link between increased telework and industry-wide efficiency, cost savings, and TFP growth—challenging the push for full return-to-office mandates. That's the key take-away message of this episode of the Wise Decision Maker Show, which discusses the government research that reveals the remote work productivity revolution.This article forms the basis for this episode: https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/government-research-reveals-the-remote-work-productivity-revolution/

In this episode of Pilot's Portfolio, Timothy P. Pope, CFP® continues the Loss of Medical series with a deep dive into what happens if a Southwest Airlines pilot loses their medical. Tim outlines why Southwest's program may be the most pilot-friendly of all the majors, including generous long-term disability benefits, a built-in COLA, a flexible tax election, and the unique “new hire bridge” benefit for newer pilots. If you fly for Southwest—or are considering it—this episode is packed with practical details and planning tips to help you protect your income and plan ahead.What You'll Learn from This EpisodeHow Southwest Calculates Disability Pay: From average earnings to TFP-based formulas for newer hires.Understanding Elimination Periods and Coverage Timelines: What happens after 60 days and how long benefits last.COLA Adjustments and Sick Bank Top-Ups: How Southwest lets you increase benefits over time or supplement with accrued sick leave.Tax Election Options: When and why to choose taxable vs. non-taxable disability benefits—and how timing matters.Union Supplement Plans (SWAPA): Option A vs. B explained, plus how to backfill income gaps with short-term and long-term strategies.Resources:Schedule An Appointment Our Practice's WebsiteSend Us Your QuestionsThis episode is sponsored by: Beacon RelocationBeacon Relocation is a real estate firm helping pilots and air traffic controllers save money on their real estate transactions. By tapping into their network of over 1500 real estate agents across the country, pilots can save 20% of the real estate agent's commission towards your closing cost on the sale or purchase of your home. Visit https://www.beaconrelocation.com/ to learn more. Timothy P. Pope is a Certified Financial Planner™and principal owner of 360 Aviation Advisors, LLC (“360 Aviation Advisors”), a registered investment advisory firm. Investment advisory services are provided through 360 Aviation Advisors, in its separate and individual capacity as a registered investment adviser. Podcast episodes are provided through Pilot's Portfolio, in its separate and individual capacity. We try to provide content that is true and accurate as of the date of publishing; however, we give no assurance or warranty regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or applicability of any of the contents. We assume no responsibility for information contained on this website and disclaim all liability in respect of such information, including but not limited to any liability for errors, inaccuracies, omissions, or misleading or defamatory statements. Links to external websites are provided solely for your convenience. We accept no liability for any linked sites or their content and remind you that we have no control over their content. When visiting external web sites, users should review those websites' privacy policies and other terms of use to learn more about, what, why and how they collect and use any personally identifiable information. Usage of this content constitutes an explicit understanding and acceptance of the terms of this disclaimer.

In today's episode TFP goes round for round, full house of opinions and some really grrrrreat discussions!!! Nando T throws in the towel for the tag teams and has no more love for them, do others agree??? Arianna brings heat and drops another storyline about Seth and Punk.......does Nando T like it??? Hater Mike brings the hate as usual and Jonathan covers NXT!!! CHEERS!!!JERKING THE CURTAINROUND TABLE OF TOPICSNEWSBritt Baker is actively working on leaving AEWWWE has a Karrion Kross problem It's Official……the time is now to give up on WWE tag team wrestling (discussion) Liv's surgery is successful, no updates on Chad and Otis's surgery Street Fighter movie pulling WWE Superstars WWE having security problems for the females CM Punk making news with the fans Nando folds like a chairSmackdown Cody and Randy get serenaded by Riyadh…..promos were mehhhhJC Mateo has some power, fun to watch Humberto and Angel take the Triple A tag titles……discussion, is this the right move???Zelinas cosplay character is drowning…..thank you Giulia!!! Challenger wishlist???Asuka speaks truth to JadeBlack has had enough truth…..is Priest next???Tag team stories are back to being trash again Nia and Tiffy lose the crowd……wishlist for Tiffany???Punk Life……thoughts??? Night of ChampionsCody and Randy jerk the curtain…..grrrreat match, Cody is KORCole jabbing at Wade is commentary gold We need Rhea and Raquel again, run it back Kross is bigger than his loss to Sami Bloodline gifts Solo the US Title…..Mikes fav wrestler is back and he brought is younger brother…..Tala TongaAre we drinking the Jade kool aid??? Punk and Cena…..thoughts???RAWIyo chooses Rhea….who wins but what's the better storyline Dom's a punkass New Tag Champs…..the Judgement Day I love Adam Pierce…..just throwing that out there…..hardest working man in the business WWE trying to hype Goldberg with old video…..did it help??? El Grande Americano!!! TFP has a crystal ball Karrion Kross is grrrrrrreat Seth's briefcase is

TFP introduces a new voice to the show, Amanda joins the show and even the odds!!! Arianna is excited to have Amanda as they join forces to create Double A!!! We officially have a battle of the sexes on the show!!! Arianna questions why Goldberg is calling his shot and why he has a match that nobody asked for??? Great debate in today's episode, Nando T feels the heat from Arianna as they have some back and forth in their debate!!! We get into round table of topics, RAW, Smackdown and NXT!!! CHEERS!!!JERKING THE CURTAINROUND TABLE OF TOPICSNEWSNikita Lyons moved to Evolve Plans on Smackdown moving back to 2 hours WWE developing a new woman's tag team…..do we care??? Liv injury more serious than we thought Smackdown Cena kicks off the show, we are reminded the men's roster is stacked Helluva RKOFatu and Solo cooking Chelsea still giving us her time even though she's away Nia gives the birds to Jade, Jade is moving on Naomi's new entrance music is fiyuhhhhhhh…..Tick Tock Tiffany Cena wants Ron but gets Punk'd Charlotte and Alexa look damn goodShould Cody be competing for King of the Ring???Cody wins!!!RAWDirty Dom boos are getting lazy Welcome back Asuka, man she looks awesome Was Rhea wearing a rabbit on her top???Oh Judgement Day, still cookinGunther……Your Next!!!AJ gets another shot and so does Bayley Kairi puts another wrestler on the shelf Have we figured out what Kross is up to? Jey is headed to KORSeth vs Cody is fiyuhhhhhhhNXT”I just got the title and the world is on my ass” Jacy Jayne Jada is moving forward, wins with an asterisk Lash Legends qualifies Tony D's mind is playing tricks on him Tatum awkwardly late to the game Jordynne and Lola give us a grrrreat match Too much Glamour for Blake Monroe???NXT beating Jacy Jaynes slap to death…..horrible storyline Episodes dropping weekly!!!Follow on the gram @the.funkaholiks.podYouTube and Facebook THEE POD THAT TALKS WHAT THEY LOVE 

In this week's extended episode, Communications Committee Chair Matt McCants explains the new expectations for red-eye pairings when it comes to QOL TR pulls during a CQT month. He also goes deep on all things vacation shifting and how shifts have performed since being implemented last year. What is the average increase in pay per pilot vacation week? How does shifting put a new spin on month to month vacation weeks? Maybe there's TFP on the table for you to pick up. He also adds key context and backstory to the announcement of the China Airlines partnership. What's changed behind the scenes to finally kick airline partnerships into gear? What's the connection between your CBA's Section 1 language and the Company's push for low-cost revenue?  And most importantly, what does this mean to you as a Southwest Pilot? Listen in and find out.If you have any feedback for us at all, please drop us a line at comm@swapa.org or tap here to send us a text.Follow us online:Twitter - https://twitter.com/swapapilotsFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/swapa737

What if retirement planning wasn't just about saving but about learning how to spend? In Part 2 of The Human Side of Retirement,  Brendan Frazier continues his conversation with Dan Haylett to explore the emotional and psychological aspects of decumulation. They dig into the behavioral side of this transition, why a "save, save, save" mindset can hold clients back, and how to reframe retirement as a time to pursue fulfillment. And they offer practical strategies advisors can use to guide clients through this transition so retirement becomes not just a financial milestone, but a fulfilling new chapter. You'll Learn:  Mastering the skill of spending money in retirement  Creating intentional spending habits to smooth the transition  Reframing the success rates of financial plans  The significance of the 50 to 70 "sweet spot" years for optimal life experiences  *To sign up for Brendan's newsletter packed with resources to master the human side of advice → Click Here Connect with Brendan Frazier:  RFG Advisory LinkedIn: Brendan Frazier Connect with Dan Haylett:  Humans vs Retirement LinkedIn: Dan Haylett TFP Financial Planning About Our Guest:  Dan Haylett is the director, Head of Growth, and financial Planner at TFP Financial Planning. As a co-director of TFP, Dan's “pull back the duvet every morning” purpose is helping our clients spend their time and money on what's truly important. His passion for understanding and learning about the emotional, behavioural and financial challenges of life after work makes him a true specialist in helping clients have the freedom and confidence to take advantage of their ‘window of spending opportunity' and live their best life. – Content here is for illustrative purposes and general information only. It is not legal, tax, or individualized financial advice; nor is it a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any specific security, or engage in any specific trading strategy. Information here may be provided, in part, by third-party sources. These sources are generally deemed to be reliable; however, neither our guest nor RFG Advisory guarantee the accuracy of third-party sources. The views expressed here are those of our guest. They do not necessarily represent those of RFG Advisory, its employees, or its clients. This commentary should not be regarded as a description of advisory services provided by RFG Advisory, or performance returns of any client. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. Securities offered by Registered Representatives of Private Client Services. Member FINRA / SIPC. Advisory services offered by Investment Advisory Representatives of RFG Advisory, LLC (“RFG Advisory or “RFG”), a registered investment advisor. Private Client Services and RFG Advisory are unaffiliated entities. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where RFG Advisory and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. No advisory services may be rendered by RFG Advisory unless a client agreement is in place. RFG Advisory is an SEC-registered investment adviser. SEC registration does not constitute an endorsement of RFG by the Commission, nor does it indicate that RFG or any associated investment advisory representative has attained a particular level of skill or ability.

What's up Bros? We are back with Momtok for episode 2. This show is amazing. The drama is non-stop and the cast is crushing it this season. In this episode, Taylor's family has a bbq where they try to convince her to stay with Dakota, the man who has screwed her over time and time again. It was brutal to watch. Zac sits down with Jessi and Demi to try and clear the air, but they end up unearthing some lies that Jen has been telling both parties. They all get ready for the big halloween party, but Jessi and Demi have a special surprise... They flew in a Chippendales dancer to teach their husbands the ropes and perform for the party. At the party, things escalate quickly when Chase starts going in on TFP with Dakota listening to the whole interaction. Things are about to get messy in MomTok. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What's up Bros? In this episode we get the conclusion of the halloween party. TFP and Dakota couldnt be more at odds. Chase cowers to Brett after he made a sarcastic comment/ poked Demi. Kate talks all the smack on Chase and if one thing was accomplished, it appears Miranda and Taylor are reconnecting. Zac sits and watches Jen get a Chippendales dance. Miranda and Taylor sit down to finally hash out what really happened with the swinging scandal. Mikayla opens up and shares her traumatic past with SA and how she is taking steps to better herself. It ends with some big news for Jen and Zac that sort of shows where Jen's headspace is, and she is not in the best place at the moment... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Retirement isn't just about reaching a number - it's a deeply personal transition that requires more than financial planning. By understanding what truly matters beyond the numbers, you can better support clients in creating meaningful and fulfilling retirements. In Part One of this episode, Dan Haylett emphasizes the importance of shifting the focus from financial figures to human connection, purpose, and lasting memories. And he walks through the Retirement Planning Workbook he uses with clients to help them live with purpose, joy and meaning in retirement You'll Learn:  The importance of understanding the emotional aspects of retirement and his own experiences helping clients navigate this transition The revolutionary "Retirement Planning Workbook" he developed to address the human side of retirement How to help clients spend their savings meaningfully to create lasting memories *To sign up for Brendan's newsletter packed with resources to master the human side of advice → Click Here Connect with Brendan Frazier:  RFG Advisory LinkedIn: Brendan Frazier Connect with Dan Haylett:  Humans vs Retirement LinkedIn: Dan Haylett TFP Financial Planning About Our Guest:  Dan Haylett is the director, Head of Growth, and financial Planner at TFP Financial Planning. As a co-director of TFP, Dan's “pull back the duvet every morning” purpose is helping our clients spend their time and money on what's truly important. His passion for understanding and learning about the emotional, behavioural and financial challenges of life after work makes him a true specialist in helping clients have the freedom and confidence to take advantage of their ‘window of spending opportunity' and live their best life. – Content here is for illustrative purposes and general information only. It is not legal, tax, or individualized financial advice; nor is it a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any specific security, or engage in any specific trading strategy. Information here may be provided, in part, by third-party sources. These sources are generally deemed to be reliable; however, neither our guest nor RFG Advisory guarantee the accuracy of third-party sources. The views expressed here are those of our guest. They do not necessarily represent those of RFG Advisory, its employees, or its clients. This commentary should not be regarded as a description of advisory services provided by RFG Advisory, or performance returns of any client. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. Securities offered by Registered Representatives of Private Client Services. Member FINRA / SIPC. Advisory services offered by Investment Advisory Representatives of RFG Advisory, LLC (“RFG Advisory or “RFG”), a registered investment advisor. Private Client Services and RFG Advisory are unaffiliated entities. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where RFG Advisory and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. No advisory services may be rendered by RFG Advisory unless a client agreement is in place. RFG Advisory is an SEC-registered investment adviser. SEC registration does not constitute an endorsement of RFG by the Commission, nor does it indicate that RFG or any associated investment advisory representative has attained a particular level of skill or ability.

Today's Topics: 1) TFP sends well wishes and offers a prayer for Pope Leo XIII https://www.returntoorder.org/2025/05/tfp-communique-on-the-election-of-leo-xiv/ Cardinal Dolan: New Pope will seek to 'build bridges" with Trump https://www.reuters.com/world/new-york-cardinal-dolan-says-new-pope-will-seek-build-bridges-with-trump-2025-05-09/ Saint Michael Archangel's providential connection to Pope Leo https://cforc.com/2025/05/saint-michaels-providential-connection-to-the-new-pope-leo-xiv/ 2) Pope Leo XIV already showing positive signs https://www.knightsrepublic.com/single-post/pope-leo-xiv-already-showing-positive-signs 3, 4) In Part 57 of this series, Jesse and Anita discuss "Prayer Is the Best Weapon," beginning on page 291, in The Liber Christo Method of Healing and Deliverance, by Dr. Dan Schneider

Falk sitzt heute zusammen mit Dir an einen seiner Lieblingsorte, einem kleinen Bach im Wald. Es geht um die Dinge, die wir gern fotografieren und warum das (idealerweise) Einfluss auf unser Leben hat. Hast Du Dein Lieblingsgenre? Geniesst Du das oder vermisst Du manchmal etwas? Hast Du Ideen, warum wir Fotomenschen hin und wieder in kreative Tiefs verfallen und wie wir das ändern können? Wir freuen uns auf Eure Kommentare unter dem Folgen Post bei Instagram oder in der Freundeskreis Community von Fotografie tut gut!

Namaste and welcome back to The Finale Pod! We are discussing Lauren's pick: the Season 3 finale of The White Lotus. At least three corpses, a few failed poison smoothies, and a $5 million hush deal later, Thailand's most cursed resort delivers a finale that's equal parts bloodbath and bewilderment (why, Rick?!). Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on The White Lotus! We start our recap discussion at the [15:10:00] mark if you want to fast forward past the Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission about piña coladas (and possibly getting caught in the rain). The overall TFP rating for the Season 3 finale of The White Lotus is 6.100. Network: HBO / Max Genre: Black comedy; Comedy-drama; Tragicomedy; Satire Created and written by: Mike White Starring: Leslie Bibb, Carrie Coon, Walton Goggins, Sarah Catherine Hook, Jason Isaacs, Lalisa Manobal, Michelle Monaghan, Sam Nivola, Lek Pataravadi, Parker Posey, Natasha Rothwell, Patrick Schwarzenegger, Tayme Thapthimthong, Aimee Lou Wood, Jon Gries, Sam Rockwell, Scott Glenn Join us soon for the next episode of The Finale Pod!

In this episode, Dr. Otto Kernberg, a pioneer of Transference-Focused Psychotherapy (TFP), discusses personality disorders through a psychoanalytic lens. Explore key insights into Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), identity diffusion, primitive defense mechanisms such as splitting and projective identification, and the complexities of narcissistic, paranoid, schizoid, and histrionic personalities. Dr. Kernberg also shares reflections on sexuality, aggression, reflective functioning, and why therapists choose to help others. By listening to this episode, you can earn 1.5 Psychiatry CME Credits. Link to blog. Link to YouTube video.

4/7/25 - Rex Teodosio is a public speaker, writer and documentary producer. He gives tours of talks in the Midwest about the prophecies of Our Lady of Fatima and its relevance. He has given talks for conferences, retreats, youth camps and schools and regularly writes for Crusade Magazine and TFP.org, also heading his own blog titled In Defense of Holy Matrimony. On March 28th, hundreds gathered on the grounds of the Kansas Capitol Building to protest a Satanic Black Mass. The American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family, and Property (TFP) organized the rally of reparation and protest. After the rally, news spread quickly that someone had intervened to prevent the desecration of a host, and many still want to know the full story. Who was the man who leaped into action, and what exactly happened to the Host? Rex Teodosio spoke to the man in question, Randy, to get the full story! Read the article at https://www.tfp.org/the-story-of-randy-the-man-who-saved-the-host-from-the-topeka-satanic-ritual/

In this episode, we're joined by Professor Jomo Kwame Sundaram, a Malaysian economist and thought leader who served as the Assistant Secretary-General for Economic Development at the United Nations (UN) and Assistant Director-General at the FAO. We explore how countries in the Global South can chart their own paths to prosperity.   What makes a country truly developed? Is it just GDP per capita or something deeper?   Professor Jomo challenges conventional economic dogma—unpacking flawed narratives around FDI, inflation, aid, and industrial policy. With sharp historical insight and grounded realism, he examines why only a few countries have truly made the leap from developing to developed, and what it takes for the rest to follow.   We dive deep into: • Why South Korea's path to development is so unique—and rarely replicated • The dangers of relying too heavily on foreign direct investment (FDI) • How resource-rich countries like Tanzania and Equatorial Guinea remain poor • The role of good governance—myth vs. reality • Industrial policy and protectionism in the modern age • The myth of the 2% inflation target and the origins of TFP calculations • Why we need whistleblowers in economics to fight mythology   Key Takeaways from the Episode: 1. GDP Isn't Everything: Professor Jomo argues that true development is about human capabilities—not just high income. Many mineral-rich countries show that high GDP doesn't guarantee a capable, prosperous society. 2. FDI Is Not a Magic Bullet: Countries like South Korea succeeded by limiting FDI and building domestic capacity. In contrast, over-reliance on foreign capital can lead to wealth extraction without long-term benefits. 3. Governance Indicators Are Circular: Metrics of good governance often reinforce existing biases, labeling developing countries as inherently poor-governed based on narrow criteria. 4. Aid Isn't Always Altruistic: While aid can help, it often serves political purposes and fails to address structural problems. Misguided advice—like telling Tanzania not to tax gold mining—has impoverished nations further. 5. The Power of Industrial Policy: From the U.S. post-Civil War to modern-day China, industrial policy has always driven real growth. The current revival of protectionism may reshape global trade dynamics. 6. The Myth of the 2% Inflation Target: Professor Jomo dismantles the origin story of the widely accepted 2% inflation target, tracing it back to a political slogan in New Zealand rather than any real economic justification. 7. Emerging Markets Must Think Contextually: There's no one-size-fits-all model for development. Local conditions, capabilities, and smart policymaking matter more than mimicking the West. 8. Technology's Role Is Complex: AI and machine learning have vast potential, but without equitable distribution, they may worsen inequality. True progress lies in how benefits are shared.   Join us for this unfiltered, eye-opening episode with Professor Jomo, where we challenge dominant development narratives and explore the real ingredients of economic transformation.   Follow our host on Linkedln to know more or subscribe to our emailing list to get new episodes directly into your inbox.   This conversation is part of the Emerging Market Innovation Series, brought to you in collaboration with Strategic Counsel, where we're also joined by Hafidzi Razali, Founder and CEO of Strategic Counsel.   Timestamps: (00:00) – Introduction to Professor Jomo and his global economic leadership (02:00) – What defines a developed country? Why GDP isn't enough (05:50) – The FDI trap: Why foreign capital can hinder national development (12:10) – Lessons from Korea, China, and Singapore (17:45) – Mariana Mazzucato, moonshots, and the entrepreneurial state debate (24:00) – Financialization and the decline of real innovation (30:50) – Industrial policy from Hamilton to Biden: A history of protectionism (36:10) – Extractive vs. inclusive institutions: Debating colonial legacy (43:00) – The French CFA zone and the myth of aid (49:30) – Inflation targeting and monetary policy misconceptions (55:00) – Can AI drive growth—or deepen inequality? (60:00) – Final thoughts on building resilient, people-first economies

In this episode, we dive deep into the latest pinball rumors, industry news, and some wild speculation—because why not? We kick things off by discussing what Barrels of Fun might have in store for their next game and explore possible themes like Dune, G.I. Joe, and The Goonies (links below for reference). We also chat about Wonderland Amusements and Powlowski Pinball's involvement in the scene. Then, we shift gears to talk about the ever-evolving world of home pinball—does Wonderland's new machine make sense at $799? Can it actually deliver a real pinball experience at that price point, or will it follow the same path as Arcade1Up? Speaking of innovation, we also touch on Multimorphic's P3 platform—a console-like approach to pinball that lets you swap out playfields for a completely new game. On the hardware side, we break down the latest in pinball glass—PinnGlass, JJP Invisiglass, Stern HD Glass, and Voodoo Glass. Plus, we've got some inside scoop on Stern's Venom topper—it's coming VERY soon and might introduce something completely new for a Stern topper. Will it release before TFP? We think so—probably next week! And of course, we couldn't wrap up without talking about Dungeons & Dragons Pinball! So far, it's been an absolute blast with an awesome battle mechanic, but… let's talk about those reboots and crashes. The good news? George Gomez himself confirmed a fix is coming in next week's code update. Looking to Buy a New or Used Pinball Machine? Check out Flip N' Out Pinball: https://www.flipnoutpinball.com/ LEAVE ME A VOICEMAIL and I might play it on the show! https://www.speakpipe.com/RetroRalphVM Check out Pawlowski Pinball: https://www.youtube.com/@pawlowskipinball Looking for more Pinball Content? Check out my pinball podcast “The Flipside Podcast” Video Version of the Podcast can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/@TheFlipsideRetroRalph Want to listen to the podcast instead? Here's links to Spotify and Apple Podcasts! Spotify Link To Podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/62ZF6rZGos5tFI77MaznZY Apple Podcast Link: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-flipside-pinball-podcast/id1753621594 Subscribe to The Flipside Podcast so you don't miss an episode! https://rb.gy/uqi2an [RETRO RALPH MERCHANDISE AND CONTACT INFO] Get your Retro Ralph Merch Here: https://bit.ly/2YS5ukX Follow Retro Ralph on Twitter: https://bit.ly/39mdqzy Follow Retro Ralph On Instagram: https://bit.ly/3fU1Dew If you would like me to do a video review of your product or for other business inquiries, send me an email: retroralph1980@gmail.com

Trade-for-print (TFP) shoots can be an excellent way to build your portfolio, collaborate with models, and refine your creative style. However, without a structured approach, TFP shoots can quickly become frustrating, unorganized, and a waste of time. Many photographers experience flaky models, last-minute cancellations, or misunderstandings about how many images will be delivered.The key to a successful TFP shoot is treating it just as professionally as a paid session—with clear expectations, organized communication, and structured boundaries.In this photography podcast episode, I will share the exact step-by-step system I use to run TFP shoots efficiently and professionally, so you can get high-quality results without dealing with unreliable people.This episode will cover:Why I never post model calls on Instagram (and where I find reliable models instead)How to set clear expectations upfront to avoid misunderstandingsHow over-communicating prevents cancellations and gets models to take the shoot seriouslyHow to structure a TFP workflow from model booking to final image deliveryHow to avoid last-minute cancellations and no-showsThe boundaries I set to prevent burnout and protect my timeBy following these steps, you will eliminate stress, work with dependable models, and create stunning images without frustration.Honeybook: https://share.honeybook.com/Jessicawhttps://aftershoot.com/jessica-whitaker/⁠What's Next:Follow me on Insta: ⁠https://instagram.com/jessicawhitaker⁠Join the Facebook group: ⁠https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildandbloomjessicawhitaker⁠Business Basics: ⁠https://www.jessicawhitaker.co/businessbasics⁠

This is thee pod that talks what they love and TFP loves them some WWE man soap!!! In today's episode the guys talk Smackdown, RAW and NXT, plus we get into a round table of topics!!! Has Lex Luger been forgiven by the WWE Universe? Is Rey Fenix the mystery luchador? Does Cody need help at Wrestlemania? All this and so much more!!! CHEERS!!!JERKING THE CURTAINROUND TABLE OF TOPICSNEWSA new HOF announcement, Lex Luger……has he been forgiven?WWE has removed freaken from Seth Rollins name…….do we care???Travis Scott catching heat for slap on Cody…..will WWE spin this story and is it one we would want???Stone Cold will be in Vegas for WMSmackdown Drew takes his anger out on Priest Randy kicks off the show Give us more Chelsea and Tiffany Aldis doing trigonometry with the tag teams…..we're just as confused Yesssss boy

During Hour 3 The Fourth Period's David Pagnotta joined the show discussing news from around the NHL and TFP's trade target board. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Dr. David Puder interviews Dr. Frank Yeomans, a leading expert in Transference-Focused Psychotherapy (TFP) and personality disorders, to explore the treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). They discuss object relations theory, identity diffusion, splitting, and the therapeutic relationship in TFP. Dr. Yeomans shares clinical insights on working with paranoid, devaluing, and omnipotent transferences, highlighting how therapists can navigate idealization, devaluation, and therapeutic neutrality. They also compare TFP with other psychodynamic approaches and discuss the role of aggression in mentalization and personality integration. Learn how TFP helps patients develop a stable identity Understand the differences between BPD and NPD treatment Explore the role of transference in psychotherapy Tune in for a deep dive into psychodynamic therapy with one of the field's top experts!   Link to blog Link to YouTube video

The Finale Pod waddles into Gotham this week, unpacking the ruthless rise of Oswald Cobb. We are discussing Linnea's pick: the Season 1 finale of The Penguin. While Oz solidifies his place as Gotham's kingpin, we get revealing flashbacks, aggressive Mommy & Me therapy, backstabbing murders galore, and the ominous na-na-na-na Batman signal. Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on The Penguin! We start our recap discussion at the (17:50:00) mark if you want to fast forward past the Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission about the hottest Batmans to grace our screens. The overall TFP rating for the Season 1 finale of The Penguin is 8.50. Network: HBO. Genre: Crime drama. Developed by: Lauren LeFranc. Starring: Colin Farrell, Cristin Milioti, Rhenzy Feliz Join us in a few months for Season 4 of The Finale Pod!  

On Episode 385 of The Tennis Files Podcast, you'll learn how to improve your serve technique featuring advice from Karue Sell, James Ludlow, Peter Freeman, Dr. Mark Kovacs, and your host Mehrban Iranshad. On the show, you'll learn the biggest serve leaks, how to gain more power on the serve, how to fix the racquet drop, how to use your kinetic chain, how to do proper serve toss, and much more! I really hope you enjoy the show! If there is a particularly useful piece of advice that you discovered from it, let me know in the comments below. And be sure to subscribe to Tennis Files to receive the latest tennis content to improve your game straight to your inbox. TFP 381: Q&A Edition — Net Play, Serve Power, Injury Recovery and Footwork TFP 223: How to Simplify Your Serve and Develop a Winning Mindset with Karue Sell TFP 352: Serve Technique Masterclass with James Ludlow – From the 2021 archives TFP 238: 5 Reasons Why Tennis Players Can't Serve Properly with Peter Freeman TFP 205: Dr. Mark Kovacs — Serve and Backhand Technique Q&A Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

All rise for this week's episode of The Finale Pod! Today we are discussing Alex's pick: the Season 1 finale of Presumed Innocent. Rusty's murder trial may be over, but the drama is far from settled. We learn the twisted truth behind the death of Carolyn and the distinction between a pitchfork and a fireplace poker. Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on Presumed Innocent! We start our recap discussion at the (15:50:00) mark if you want to skip past our Co-host Catch-up, Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission about whether you've ever been falsely accused. The overall TFP rating for the Season 1 finale of Presumed Innocent is 7.97. Network: Apple TV+ Genre: Legal thriller Based on: Presumed Innocent by Scott Turow Starring: Jake Gyllenhaal, Ruth Negga, Bill Camp, O-T Fagbenle, Chase Infiniti, Nana Mensah, Renate Reinsve, Peter Sarsgaard The next finale we will review is Linnea's pick, and she chose the Season 1 finale of The Penguin. Colin Farrell shines as Gotham's waddling crime lord (and mommy's boy) and we obsess over the wardrobe of Sofia Gigante, née Falcone. 

Today, The Frontier Psychatrists welcomes back my friend Ben Spielberg. He's been a reader for a long time and has contributed to the newsletter in the past. It was on Clinical Trial design, a perennial favorite around these parts.With only light edits, what follows is his work, narrated by me, for the Audio Version.I would invite you to the live class today on working as an out-of-network provider, but it sold out last night, so you'll have to wait for the next one. My prior article on Spravato is available here.The year is 2024. OpenAI has just launched its latest update to ChatGPT, promising more natural and less artificial-sounding language. Donald Trump has won the nomination for President of the United States. Another chain of ketamine clinics has engaged in a corporate reorganization. There is conflict in the Middle East. Are we sure that we're not living Groundhog's Day?I am the founder of Bespoke Treatment, an integrative mental health facility with multiple locations that has at times been referred to as a "ketamine clinic." I have also seen countless so-called "ketamine clinics" sell for pennies on the dollar and go bankrupt seemingly overnight. In this case, Numinus, a company that was publicly traded in Canada and owned a number of psychiatric clinics specializing in ketamine in the US and Canada, has sold its clinics to Stella (a company that has stealthily become one of the larger mental health providers in the country and is the first to bring the awesome SGB treatment to scale). It's not the first time this has happened. It's not the second, nor the third, nor even the fourth time this has happened. But yet, the common consensus is that ketamine clinics are a cheap, easy business with recurring revenue. So, what gives?Figure 1. A reddit user asking anesthesiologists if they should start a ketamine or Botox clinic for easy cash on the side. Does this make you feel gross? Should it?The Ketamine Clinic Model 101The most basic outline for a ketamine clinic is as follows: a provider rents an office space with, on average, five or so exam rooms. They buy equipment for infusions like a pump, catheter, needles, and syringes. They buy some comfortable recliner chairs. They hire a receptionist to answer phones, field patient questions, charge credit cards, and handle medical record requests. They hire a nurse to insert the IV, monitor vital signs, check blood pressure, juggle multiple patients at once, and make sure the ketamine is flowing into patients' veins unencumbered. Two SKUs are typically offered: ketamine infusions for mood, which last approximately 40 minutes, and ketamine infusions for pain, which last for up to 4 hours. Zofran is offered for nausea, and some clinics have fun add-ons like magnesium or NAD. An average mood infusion costs around $400-$500 in a medium cost-of-living area, while mood-infusions can run up to $700 in a higher cost-of-living area. Some clinics offer package discounts if patients buy six or more upfront, which helps with cash flow for the clinic (cash now is better than cash later, of course).A Note on Scope of PracticeThe first wave of ketamine clinics was started mainly by providers who were not mental health specialists. Instead, they were owned by anesthesiologists, ER physicians, and sometimes CRNAs. These providers were especially experienced with ketamine in hospital settings, as well as setting up infusions. Psychiatrists, on the other hand, do not usually order infusions in outpatient settings, and very few had actual hands-on experience with ketamine in practice. That being said, there are a number of variations to the model above: psychiatrist-owned ketamine clinics would often prefer to use intramuscular injections in lieu of infusions, but 2-3 injections would have to be given during a single session for mood and pain sessions were out of the question. Other ways to save costs might include having an EMT do the actual injections (this is highly state-dependent), asking nurses or MAs to work the front desk, or working a full-time regular doctor job. In contrast, your nurses run the actual ketamine services via standing orders, a written document that details routine and emergent instructions for the clinic.Some clinics offer full evaluations prior to rendering treatment, but many offer a simple brief screening on the phone to check for contraindications before scheduling a patient for their first session. The clinics owned by psychiatrists have historically been a bit more thorough in terms of the initial psychiatric evaluations, given that they can actually perform initial psychiatric evaluations within their respective scope of practice. Sometimes clinics may have therapists on-site who can render ketamine assisted therapy (meaning, therapy occurring concurrently) for an additional $100-$300. Otherwise, there is not much decision-making that goes on— other than deciding on medication dosages. Most infusions start off at .5mg/kg of body weight, which is by far the most evidence-based dosage. In practice, most clinics increase dosage every session because even though ketamine is considered to be a weight-based medicine for anesthesia, there is thought to be a “sweet spot” of dosage for everyone, if one can imagine an inverted U shape curved, where the ideal dosage for each patient is at the tippity-top of the inversion. Dosage increases are highly variable depending on the clinic: some have a maximum dosage, some will only increase a certain percentage, and some may even use standardized increments (e.g., only offering dosages in increments of 50mg). A typical series of infusions is 6-8 over 3-4 weeks, followed by boosters as needed.Fool's GoldAt first glance, the business model seems fantastic. As a cash business, there are no AR issues, no third party billing companies to deal with, and no prior authorizations to fight over. Sure, the cost is high, but it's not that high compared to many other healthcare services. Since the benefits fade over time, a ketamine clinic has built-in recurring revenue from patients every week, month, quarter, or year – it's like a subscription business! Ketamine is trendy and sexy; TV shows like White Lotus mention it, and ravers from the 90's recall it with great fondness. Unlike SSRIs and psychotherapy, ketamine works for depression fast. It's amongst the fastest treatments for depression that we have today, and there are a lot of depressed people. It can help someone out of debilitating depression in 40 minutes. It has none of the un-sexy side effects of SSRIs like sexual dysfunction, gastrointestinal discomfort, or uncontrollable sweating. Instead, it has sexy side effects: euphoria, hallucinations, and feelings of unity with the universe. Also, unlike SSRIs, it helps most people who try it. It really is an amazing treatment, and I often feel grateful that my clinic is able to offer it to patients in needFigure 2. Most business-savvy reddit user.Supply and Demand… or SomethingMood disorders disproportionately affect individuals who are of lower socioeconomic status compared to individuals with a lot of disposable income. Of course, wealthier individuals are no more immune to mental health disorders than anyone else, but the main target market that benefits most from ketamine just do not have the means to afford it. They don't have $3,000 to burn on yet another treatment that may or may not work. Often, the patients who could really use a series of ketamine infusions cannot scrounge enough money for a single infusion, let alone a whole series and prn boosters. However, there should be enough depressed people with cash to throw around out there… right?Wait, Isn't That A Horse Tranquilizer?Of course, ketamine clinics can find more patients via marketing and advertising. However, I've found that many medical doctors who see this population, like primary care providers, are not up to date with the research. When I first launched my company, I used to go door-to-door to medical buildings in Santa Monica with cookies to speak with them about advancements in interventional psychiatry. I cannot count the number of times that I was laughed out of each office; referring providers are risk-averse, and the perception of ketamine has traditionally been poor. Medical doctors would exclaim, “Of course people feel better; you're getting them high,” and lament that I was administering a drug thought to be highly addictive. Psychotherapists, who would also be fantastic referral partners, generally refer to psychiatry, but it's less common for them to refer to specific treatments. Nowadays, psychotherapists who are particularly invested in ketamine can sign up with venture-backed companies like Journey Clinical and render their own ketamine-assisted psychotherapy with some prescriber supervision. The issue is that despite the media attention, people with depression don't read innovative health newsletters, nor do they review papers in scientific journals. They rely on information from their psychiatrists, medication management providers, and psychotherapists. If they are not told that this is an option for them, they won't hear about it without ad spend. Oh yeah, and there is a major issue with ad spend: the word ketamine itself is a restricted drug term, and legitimate clinics routinely get banned from Google and Meta for mentioning it, which makes digital advertising more difficult than it would be for any other legitimate service.The Matthew Perry EffectKetamine is very desirable for some patients (unfortunately, sometimes the patients who want it most are frankly the worst candidates for it), but I'd wager that the majority of patients who need it are kind of scared of it. They want to feel good, they want relief from depression and trauma, but it's a weird thing to do a drug that is a horse tranquilizer and also an anesthetic in a reclining chair in a medical office that tricks your brain into feeling like you're dead for a little bit. It's kind of far off from acupuncture and more traditional alternative medicine. There is certainly a non-zero addictive potential that needs to be carefully weighed, it's not a particularly comfortable experience for many patients—especially those with a history of trauma—even if it helps after the experience is over. Additionally, the famous actor from the most famous show in the world, who was deemed to have a cause of death relating to ketamine, isn't exactly helping mass adoption. Overall, this just makes marketing and advertising even more expensive, because a) the majority of referring providers are skeptical, b) patients can't pay for it and c) patients who can pay for it are cautious.Disruptive Business ModelsIn the model I've described above, there are 3 sets of cost centers: rent, staff, and marketing. In some areas of the country, rent may be negligible, and in others, it is quite high. Like an owner-operated restaurant, if a clinic is owned by a company that is not a clinician, they have to find one and pay for one. Venture-backed companies like Mindbloom, Better U, and Joyous have also created entire businesses on the back of the COVID-era controlled substance waivers, whereby they send patients ketamine tablets and/or lozenges directly through the mail. Unlike the clinic model, they don't have rent to pay, and since national marketing campaigns are often cheaper than hyper-local brick and mortar campaigns, they are able to find new patients at lower acquisition costs compared to their clinic counterparts. Some patients do extensive research before treatment and only want to find IV clinics that offer specific dosages, but many are fine with the cheapest ketamine possible, and would prefer to pay as low as $150 for an entire month compared to $3,000.Figure 3. Did you sign up for a discounted ketamine subscription on Black Friday after purchasing a new flat-screen TV?Spravato: Coming In HotJohnson & Johnson's branded esketamine (note the prefix es) is on track to reach coveted “blockbuster status.” While it was FDA approved for Major Depressive Disorder in 2019, it took some time to catch on for a number of reasons including skepticism that the added es only added to pharma pockets and didn't actually work, health insurance companies taking time to decide on what their medical necessity criteria should be, and social isolation due to COVID-19 being a thing. My clinic has become one of the larger Spravato providers in the Los Angeles area, and while we still offer ketamine infusions, our infusion census has decreased by over 70%. The scenario is this: a patient with severe depression comes in to see us, they've heard about ketamine, but they find out that Spravato is covered by insurance for a $20 copay. Maybe ketamine has slightly better efficacy (which, in my opinion, is really just a function of being able to adjust dosage). Still, patients would prefer paying a lot less money to receive almost-the-same benefits.Death By A Thousand SticksThere are a number of other issues with the model that become problematic, especially at scale. Large medical distributors like McKesson and Henry Shein have instituted CYA policies, limiting ketamine sales to licensed anesthesiologists. Medical malpractice carriers alike have followed suit, requesting detailed addendums from providers regarding their ketamine training or flat-out refusing coverage for anyone who isn't an anesthesiologist. Since controlled substance manufacturing is directed by the DEA based on their own predictions, it's not uncommon for ketamine to go on shortage for weeks to months at a time. There are a myriad of problems with the model of point solutions which have been detailed here already, but in short, the old adage rings true: if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail, and if all you have is ketamine, everything looks like a juicy vein. But while ketamine is a highly efficacious treatment, it's not the best treatment for everyone, and patients can become downright dysregulated after ketamine, which a clinic in this model just can't handle adequately at scale. And ultimately, methods to do everything cheaper don't work out that well. For example, putting multiple patients in one room may seem like a good idea, but it is ultimately not conducive to the actual ketamine experience. Any sort of vertical integration also adds an insurmountable amount of complexity, like starting to offer Spravato or TMS, because now they have to start accepting insurance, become in-network, manage billing and AR, and so on. Depending on location and the clinic set-up, they also require specialized providers onsite.Figure 4. Supply chain issues abound.Insurance IssuesSome patients try to be well-informed. They, rightly or otherwise, don't believe everything they hear from their providers, so they call up their health insurance companies and ask. They just call the phone number on the back of the card and ask the representative if ketamine infusions are covered. Undoubtedly, the representative says yes—even though many insurance companies have published guidelines that explicitly deny any coverage for ketamine for a mental health disorder. These patients come in frustrated, distrustful of their providers and reaffirms their belief that ketamine clinics are just cash grabs. Even if one manages to obtain a coveted insurance contract for ketamine, like Ketamine Wellness Centers had with the VA, it kickstarts cashflow and complexity issues that scale should sort out, but ultimately doesn't because of the aforementioned issues above.Overall, it is possible to have a successful ketamine clinic in 2024. Still, it isn't easy due to market conditions, the population served, and the ever-changing landscape of mental health treatment. While many successful clinics exist today, the wheels tend to start to fall off when scaling, where all of a sudden, a clinic's reach has surpassed its captive population. Otherwise, it becomes a series of continual cost-cutting until there is nothing left to cut… save for the business itself.Ben Spielberg is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Bespoke Treatment, a comprehensive mental health facility with offices in Los Angeles, CA, and Las Vegas, NV. He is also a PhD Candidate in Cognitive Neuroscience at Maastricht University.For more on psychiatric medications, buy my book Inessential Pharmacology. (amazon link).For pieces by other TFP contributors, follow:Alex Mendelsohn, Michelle Bernabe, RN, @Psych Fox, Carlene MacMillan, MD, David Carreon, M.D., Benjamin Lippmann, DO, Awais Aftab, Courtny Hopen BSN, HNB-BC, CRRN, Leon Macfayden and many others! The Frontier Psychiatrists is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thefrontierpsychiatrists.substack.com/subscribe

After 44 years of local reporting, there's not a person who knows Chattanooga's story better than Dave Flessner, which is exactly why we wanted to have him as our guest for the 100th episode of the podcast. In this episode, Dave shares the unconventional path that led him to be a journalist, the history of the Times Free Press, and some of the hardest stories he's had to cover during his career. Dave Flessner recently retired as the Business Editor of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. You can read his articles on the TFP website and you can connect with him on LinkedIn (linkedin.com/in/david-flessner-39243413). If you liked this episode, we think you'll also like: Jim Kennedy's Morning Cup (E37) Bob Corker's Morning Cup (E52) Cam Doody's Morning Cup (E63) My Morning Cup is hosted by Mike Costa of Costa Media Advisors and produced by SpeakEasy Productions.  Subscribe to the weekly newsletter here and be the first to know who upcoming guests are!

Unlike Stephen DeMarco, we aren't telling you lies, cause the Finale Pod is back! We are discussing Lauren's pick: the Season 2 finale of Tell Me Lies. Stephen's revenge brings chaos to Bree and Evan's wedding, Lucy's love life gets messier than a frat party, and Wrigley faces a devastating loss that breaks our hearts. Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on Tell Me Lies! The overall TFP rating for the Season 2 finale of Tell Me Lies is 7.30. Network: Hulu Genre: Drama Based on: Tell Me Lies by Carola Lovering Starring: Grace Van Patten, Jackson White, Catherine Missal, Alicia Crowder We start our recap discussion at the (12:30:00) mark if you want to fast forward past the Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission about what you'd do with a juicy secret if you were Stephen. The next finale we will review is Alex's pick and she chose the Season 1 finale of Presumed Innocent. Rusty's courtroom drama hits harder than a 10-minute version of All Too Well, as the once-revered prosecutor finds himself on trial for the shocking murder of his coworker.  

Step out of Vault 33 and into The Finale Pod's radioactive wasteland. Today we are discussing Linnea's pick: the Season 1 finale of Fallout. When Lucy learns about her father's shady Vault-Tec past, Hank escapes the birdcage and goes all “Viva New Vegas" on us. Meanwhile, The Ghoul dazzles, Maximus becomes a Brotherhood legend, and a brain-on-a-Roomba traps Norm in a Vault. Okie dokie? Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on Fallout! We start our recap discussion at (10:20:00) if you want to fast forward past the Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission about choosing to live in a bomb shelter. The overall TFP rating for the Season 1 finale of Fallout is 8.27. Network: Amazon Prime Video Genre: Action, Drama, Post-apocalyptic, Sci-fi Western Based on: The role-playing video game franchise Fallout by Bethesda Softworks Starring: Ella Purnell, Aaron Moten, Kyle MacLachlan, Moisés Arias, Xelia Mendes-Jones, Walton Goggins The next finale we will review is Lauren's pick, and she chose the Season 2 finale of Tell Me Lies... Love. Gaslighting. Revenge. What more could you ask for in an early aughts, dark, toxic romance show?  

Knock, knock. Who's there? The Finale Pod with Deborah Vance's big late-night comeback! (Ok, we'll leave the jokes to Deborah and Ava.) Today we are discussing Alex's pick: the Season 3 finale of Hacks. While Deborah preps for her show's debut, Ava gets some fly headshots, and Jimmy and Kayla turn an airplane into a dramatic (coworker) proposal. Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on Hacks! We start our recap discussion at (18:20:00) if you want to fast forward past our Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission about asking your former enemy for a favor. The overall TFP rating for the Season 3 finale of Hacks is 8.37. Network: HBO Max Genre: Comedy Drama Created by: Lucia Aniello, Paul W. Downs, Jen Statsky Starring: Jean Smart, Hannah Einbinder, Carl Clemons-Hopkins, Megan Stalter, Paul W. Downs, Rose Abdoo, Mark Indelicato The next finale we will review is Linnea's pick, and she chose the Season 1 finale of Fallout. Get ready for wasteland wanderings, vault villains, and ghastly ghouls. Follow The Finale Pod on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefinalepod/ Submit a question or comment to us at: thefinalepod@gmail.com  

This week, The Finale Pod unpacks Baby Reindeer's unforgettable finale and the tearjerker reveal behind Martha's pet name for Donny by the same name. Content Warning: This episode discusses themes of sexual abuse, mental health struggles, stalking, and emotional distress. We are discussing Linnea's pick: the Season 1 finale of Baby Reindeer. Donny's life takes a tumultuous turn as he confronts the fallout from his viral YouTube video confession and the relentless harassment from Martha. Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on Baby Reindeer! We start our recap discussion at the 14:20 mark if you want to fast forward past our Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission about the London “tings” we got all nostalgic about in Baby Reindeer. The overall TFP rating for the Season 1 finale of Baby Reindeer is 7.83. Network: Netflix Genre: Drama, Psychological Thriller Starring: Richard Gadd The next finale we will review is Alex's pick, and she chose the Season 3 finale of Hacks. It's all lights, cameras, and cutting remarks—Deborah's out for the late show spotlight! Follow The Finale Pod on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefinalepod/ Submit a question or comment to us at: thefinalepod@gmail.com

Today, The Finale Pod is diving into London's high-stakes finance world. We are discussing Alex's pick: the Season 3 finale of Industry. Yasmin's choice between love and legacy leads her down a surprising path to Net-a-Porter, while Eric says a tearful farewell to Pierpoint's London sales floor during its inevitable closure under new ownership. Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on Industry! We start our recap discussion at the 15:00 mark if you want to fast forward past our Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission about whether we'd ever work in finance (“trust fund - blue eyes”). The overall TFP rating for the Season 3 finale of Industry is 7.90. Network: HBO/Max (US), BBC One (UK) Genre: Drama, Financial Thriller Starring: Marisa Abela, Myha'la Herrold, Harry Lawtey, Ken Leung, Sagar Radia, Kit Harington, Sarah Goldberg The next finale we will review is Linnea's pick, and she chose the Season 1 finale of Baby Reindeer… “Don't forget to listen next week, love. I'd hate to have to peek through your curtains again. Sent from Martha's iPhone.” We couldn't resist! Follow The Finale Pod on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefinalepod/ Submit a question or comment to us at: thefinalepod@gmail.com  

Welcome along to the latest episode of The Football Pod as James O'Donoghue and Tommy Rooney catch up to talk the All-Stars, why they matter and what the night itself is like, we'll get stuck into the latest stories from club, county and life too! (01:00) - Tommy at the All-Stars, James talks why they matter.(23:00) - Interview with the Footballer of the Year Paul Conroy.(28:00) - Peter Keane to Clare.(34:00) - What are Derry going to do?(41:00) - Club winners: Errigal Ciaran and Tinahely(47:00) - The skill and importance of ground free-takers.(55:00) - Amorin's aura, TFP club, 3-point goals and dodgy doppelgängers.The Football Pod Club is brought to you by AIB. Proud sponsors of the Football, Ladies Football, Hurling and Camogie All Ireland Club Championships . Check out #TheToughest for more.

Welcome along to the latest episode of The Football Pod as James O'Donoghue and Tommy Rooney catch up to talk the All-Stars, why they matter and what the night itself is like, we'll get stuck into the latest stories from club, county and life too! (01:00) - Tommy at the All-Stars, James talks why they matter.(23:00) - Interview with the Footballer of the Year Paul Conroy.(28:00) - Peter Keane to Clare.(34:00) - What are Derry going to do?(41:00) - Club winners: Errigal Ciaran and Tinahely(47:00) - The skill and importance of ground free-takers.(55:00) - Amorin's aura, TFP club, 3-point goals and dodgy doppelgängers.The Football Pod Club is brought to you by AIB. Proud sponsors of the Football, Ladies Football, Hurling and Camogie All Ireland Club Championships . Check out #TheToughest for more.

The Finale Pod is back with a scandalous affair worth gossiping about! We are discussing Lauren's pick: the Season 3 finale of Bridgerton. Newlyweds Colin and Penelope's fresh marriage faces blackmail and high-society drama, as Penelope's bold reveal as Lady Whistledown shocks the ton and changes everything. Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on Bridgerton! We start our recap discussion at the 16:50 mark if you want to fast forward past our Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission, where we chat about our favorite romance tropes. SPOILER ALERT: We spill tea about future seasons gleaned from articles and the author who wrote the books that this series is based on. So skip over that if you must! Spoilers happen between 1:24:45 and 1:28:15. The overall TFP rating for the Season 3 finale of Bridgerton is 4.5. Network: Netflix Genre: Regency romance Based on: Bridgerton by Julia Quinn Starring: Nicola Coughlan, Luke Newton Executive Producer: Shonda Rhimes The next finale we will review is Alex's pick and she chose the Season 3 finale of Industry. Trading corsets for power suits—this one's all about high stakes and cutthroat ambition! Follow The Finale Pod on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefinalepod/ Submit a question or comment to us at: thefinalepod@gmail.com

We're heading back to Chicago's fine-dining kitchens for Alex's pick: the Season 3 finale of The Bear. In this intense closer, Carmen, Sydney, and Richie attend the emotional farewell dinner at Ever, where tensions run high and Joel McHale-sized traumas resurface. We're breaking down all the chef cameos and the raw moments this finale delivered. Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on The Bear! We start our recap discussion at the 14:50 mark if you want to fast forward past our Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission, where we share what we'd say to a former boss who deserves a piece of our minds. The overall TFP rating for the Season 3 finale of The Bear is 6.30. Network: FX on Hulu Genre: Comedy-drama Created by: Christopher Storer Starring: Jeremy Allen White, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Ayo Edebiri, Lionel Boyce, Liza Colón-Zayas, Abby Elliott, Matty Matheson The next finale we will review is Lauren's pick and she chose the Season 3 finale of Bridgerton. Prepare yourselves, dear listeners, for next week's discourse about Penelope and Colin's romance is sure to be the talk of the ton!  

We are coming off of that 200th Episode high!!! Nando T and Hater Mike are back with another jam packed episode, Nando T goes back on his word that he's not going to be shitting on companies outside of WWE!!! He's a fan by the end of the day and whether it's good or bad, TFP is talking about it!!! CHEERS!!!Round TableFeelings about RAW being 2 hours WWE considering/considered removing a judgement day member……who's your vote What happened to Joe Hendry What's it going to take for Jey to give Jimmy some time Raquel Rodriguez and how we feel about the heel character Can we please split up the Alpha Academy What the hells wrong with KO and he's getting closer to signing a contract extension Is NXT on the CW going to suffer due to CW blocking cable providers WWE open to an AJ Lee return…..good idea or bad idea Crown Jewel is looking like a waste of time, great card that will end in poor results Tiffany and Rhea tag up Viking Raiders are now War Raiders……welcome back Erik Opponents for Jey UsoClosing thoughts Follow on the Gram @the.funkaholiks.podWe are on YouTube, like subscribe or don't!!! It's your business.....YEAHHH!!!THEE POD THAT TALKS WHAT THEY LOVE 

Mazel Tov! We're kicking off Season 3 of The Finale Pod with Lauren's pick: the Season 1 finale of Nobody Wants This. In this episode, Miriam's bat mitzvah serves as the chaotic backdrop to family drama, big decisions, and the looming conversion discussion. We break down Joanne's attempt to leave the party (and her relationship), only to have that sweet, sweet romcom-tastic moment. Don't forget to leave a comment on our Instagram @thefinalepod and share your thoughts on Nobody Wants This! We start our recap discussion at the 19:10 mark if you want to fast forward past our Co-host Quickfire Catch-up, our Love It Lately recommendations, and the Icebreaker Intermission, where we chat about the most memorable bar and bat mitzvahs we've attended. The overall TFP rating for the Season 1 finale of Nobody Wants This is 6.47. Network: Netflix Genre: Romantic comedy Created by: Erin Foster Starring: Kristen Bell, Adam Brody, Justine Lupe, Timothy Simons Note: Alex recommends you listen to The World's First Podcast episode where Erin and Sara Foster share the full story of how 'Nobody Wants This' came to be! Give it a listen here. The next finale we will review is Alex's pick and she chose the Season 3 finale of The Bear. As Marcus would say: "Take us there, Bear!" Follow The Finale Pod on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefinalepod/ Submit a question or comment to us at: thefinalepod@gmail.com

On Episode 364 of The Tennis Files Podcast, founder of Tennis Tribe Will Boucek will talk about advanced doubles strategies. Will is an ATP & WTA Doubles Strategy Analyst, founder of Tennis Tribe, and host of the Doubles Only Tennis Podcast. He works with club level players, D1 college programs, and top 10 doubles players on the ATP and WTA tour to help them better understand their game and strategize against opponents. He has over 20 years of experience playing and coaching tennis, is a former college player, and is currently an NTRP 5.0. Will lives in Fort Worth, Texas and is constantly studying doubles. He started Tennis Tribe as a doubles blog in 2016 and has since turned it into one of the leading resources for doubles players who want to win more matches with a weekly newsletter, a podcast, and video lessons. He also reviews tennis gear including the latest racquets, shoes, bags, strings, and more. On the show, you'll learn the most effective doubles strategies, how to neutralize big serves and active net players, how to make adjustments in mixed doubles matches, and much more! I hope you enjoy my interview with Will! Let us know what you think about this episode in the comments below! And be sure to subscribe to Tennis Files to receive the latest tennis content to improve your game straight to your inbox! Doubles Return Cheat Sheet Doubles Only Tennis Podcast | The Tennis Tribe "Watch More Doubles" Shirts - Shop Tennis Tribe Gear (thetennistribe.com) The Tennis Tribe - YouTube Will Boucek (@WillBoucek) / Twitter The Tennis Tribe (@the_tennistribe) / Twitter The Tennis Tribe (@thetennistribe) • Instagram Inner Game of Tennis Essential Tennis Mine! TFP 278: Doubles Strategy for Club Level Players with Will Boucek Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices