POPULARITY
Categories
“Jane” aka Victim 2 was in a relationship with Diddy-- one of many girlfriends-- from 2021 until he was arrested in 2024. 90% of Jane's relationship with Diddy was sex with other men, according to Jane's testimony. She only wanted to have sex with him. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Hey kid!!!!! Do you want some Radio Ronin!??Panda is MAD Juvenile delinquents keep trying to vandalize his car!!!! Do they think Panda is a member of ICE!?!Chris and his awesome wife Bren are starting their production of “Annie” this weekend!!! Have you bought your tickets yet!??!Have you heard about the mystery of the lost Back to the Future guitar!? It's a fascinating story!!CHUNGA POLL: What do you LOVE to pay for!?! Post your answers below!!!!!Legendary movie director Guillermo Del Toro is about to release a new version of Frankenstein!!! Do you have any interest in seeing it? It's supposed to be very close to the original book!!!PLUS! Gregg has another classic laser disk movie shout out! SCHWIIING!!!! Listen now!!!It's on www.radioronin.com and everywhere you get your podcasts!!!
On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”. Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent. This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand, The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN
On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”. Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent. This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand, The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN
RIP Brian Wilson. (We victim-blame here!) States' rights: Trump imposing? Lib media's "No Kings" protests. Long FE call: Can't see much past 6-miles? Search the scriptures?The Hake Report, Thursday, June 12, 2025 ADTIMESTAMPS* (0:00:00) Start* (0:03:05) Disclaimer* (0:07:44) Hey, guys!* (0:09:26) MEADE, Richmond — SILENCE* (0:10:17) Complicated business* (0:14:30) News… RIP Brian Wilson* (0:22:05) MEADE, VA: States' rights! Let CA burn itself* (0:27:43) MEADE: CA…VA… Give me styrofoam or give me death!* (0:30:48) MEADE: They weren't created to serve us! They were freed!* (0:32:28) MANUEL, CA: India name* (0:37:01) MANUEL: Selective Constitutionalists; What about the rest of Cali* (0:42:14) Supers / Coffees / DLive* (0:48:11) Victim blaming Ashli, Azz* (0:51:58) ALEX, CA: Shooting trespassers? Prayer? Forgave liberal parents* (0:59:10) ALEX: Riots, hotel workers naturalized; Mothers* (1:01:18) ALEX: 3 shot by blacks in Australia?* (1:02:47) "No Kings" protests and rioters vs white protests* (1:12:11) Rome, America* (1:13:36) ROB, NorCal: FE* (1:36:19) ROB: globe fallacy* (1:37:18) CHRISTIAN, UT: Gnostic gospels* (1:41:55) CHRISTIAN: Why do you search the scriptures? * (1:54:40) END BLOG https://www.thehakereport.com/blog/2025/6/12/the-hake-report-thu-6-12-25PODCAST / Substack HAKE NEWS from JLP https://www.thehakereport.com/jlp-news/2025/6/12/jlp-thu-6-12-25–Hake is live M-F 9-11a PT (11-1CT/12-2ET) Call-in 1-888-775-3773 https://www.thehakereport.com/showVIDEO: YT - Rumble* - Pilled - FB - X - BitChute (Live) - Odysee*PODCAST: Substack - Apple - Spotify - Castbox - Podcast Addict*SUPER CHAT on platforms* above or BuyMeACoffee, etc.SHOP - Printify (new!) - Cameo | All My LinksJLP Network: JLP - Church - TFS - Nick - PunchieThe views expressed on this show do not represent those of BOND, Jesse Lee Peterson, the Network, this Host, or this platform. No endorsement or opposition implied!The show is for general information and entertainment, and everything should be taken with a grain of salt! Get full access to HAKE at thehakereport.substack.com/subscribe
Dr Kirk Honda interviews Mia about having been sexually abused by a pedophile.This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try at betterhelp.com/KIRK to get 10% off your first month.00:00 Introducing Mia01:31 Sharing Mia's story30:43 What was the turning point? 38:38 The capacity for harm 47:18 How much could be innate? 58:05 Mia's key takeaways Become a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOUZWV1DRtHtpP2H48S7iiw/joinBecome a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattleEmail: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contactWebsite: https://www.psychologyinseattle.comMerch: https://psychologyinseattle-shop.fourthwall.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kirk.hondaMay 26, 2025The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com
This episode is presented by Create A Video – A call from Tony in Hour 1 prompts quite the response from listeners. Plus, protests (and riots) ramping up around the nation as Leftists oppose enforcing immigration law. Subscribe to the podcast at: https://ThePetePod.com/ All the links to Pete's Prep are free: https://patreon.com/petekalinershow Media Bias Check: If you choose to subscribe, get 15% off here! Advertising and Booking inquiries: Pete@ThePeteKalinerShow.comGet exclusive content here!: https://thepetekalinershow.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In a letter to Judge Subramanian, the Government opposed the defense's motion to strike exhibits GX E-331-F-R and GX E-331-H-R, which had already been admitted into evidence on June 6, 2025. The Government argued that these exhibits were properly admitted and remain central to proving the sex trafficking allegations against Sean Combs. The letter also addressed the defense's arguments, raised in their June 8th filing and discussed in court, suggesting that the Government's overarching theory of sex trafficking should be limited or curtailed.The prosecution maintained that its theory of sex trafficking, as presented to the jury, is fully supported by both the law and the evidence admitted thus far. The letter emphasized that the exhibits in question are not only relevant but critical to establishing the elements of the trafficking offense, particularly in demonstrating the coercion, pattern of conduct, and exploitation alleged. The Government urged the Court to reject the defense's attempt to narrow the scope of the case or to exclude key evidence that speaks directly to the heart of the charges.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.396.0.pdf
In this letter to Judge Subramanian regarding the United States v. Combs trial, the defense objects to several exhibits the government intends to introduce during Jane Doe's testimony—specifically, text messages and Notes App entries Jane used as a diary during her relationship with Sean Combs. The defense argues that many of these notes fail to meet the admissibility standards under Rules 801(d)(1)(B) and 803(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. They contend that some notes should be excluded entirely because they were written after Jane read Cassie Ventura's lawsuit and after the government began its investigation, thereby lacking the necessary contemporaneity required under Rule 801(d)(1)(B). The defense also asserts that many of the notes do not meet Rule 803(3)'s standards regarding statements of then-existing mental state and should not be used to improperly guide Jane's direct testimony or bolster her credibility.Additionally, the defense objects to Exhibit C-251, arguing it contains inadmissible hearsay in the form of messages between Jane and Kristina Khorram from December 2023. They also raise a Rule 106 objection concerning the admission of certain text messages without fuller contextual information that could alter their meaning. Finally, the defense opposes the admission of Government Exhibit E-171 on both hearsay grounds and under Rule 403, asserting that its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. The letter urges the Court to prevent what the defense views as improper use of these materials to frame and improperly enhance Jane Doe's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.401.0.pdf
During the afternoon session on June 10th, 2025, at the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, the defense team continued its sustained cross-examination of Jane Doe Victim 2. The questioning remained sharply focused on attempting to undermine her credibility before the jury. Defense attorneys zeroed in on alleged inconsistencies between her in-court testimony and prior statements made to law enforcement and in civil litigation. They pressed her on precise dates, locations, and details of the alleged trafficking incidents she described, suggesting that elements of her narrative had shifted over time. The defense also highlighted text messages and communications that they argued were inconsistent with the portrayal of coercion and control presented by the government.Throughout the afternoon, Jane Doe 2 maintained her composure but showed visible signs of fatigue under the lengthy and at times repetitive questioning. The defense probed her connections to other accusers and her interactions with civil attorneys, implying possible coordination or financial motivation. Prosecutors objected at several points to the tone and scope of the questioning, but Judge Subramanian largely allowed the cross-examination to proceed. No new evidence was introduced; the session remained centered on testing the consistency and reliability of Jane Doe 2's testimony. The court adjourned with the cross-examination still ongoing, setting the stage for its conclusion in the next session.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 10, 2025 - Day 20 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN
In a letter to Judge Subramanian, the Government opposed the defense's motion to strike exhibits GX E-331-F-R and GX E-331-H-R, which had already been admitted into evidence on June 6, 2025. The Government argued that these exhibits were properly admitted and remain central to proving the sex trafficking allegations against Sean Combs. The letter also addressed the defense's arguments, raised in their June 8th filing and discussed in court, suggesting that the Government's overarching theory of sex trafficking should be limited or curtailed.The prosecution maintained that its theory of sex trafficking, as presented to the jury, is fully supported by both the law and the evidence admitted thus far. The letter emphasized that the exhibits in question are not only relevant but critical to establishing the elements of the trafficking offense, particularly in demonstrating the coercion, pattern of conduct, and exploitation alleged. The Government urged the Court to reject the defense's attempt to narrow the scope of the case or to exclude key evidence that speaks directly to the heart of the charges.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.396.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
During the afternoon session on June 10th, 2025, at the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, the defense team continued its sustained cross-examination of Jane Doe Victim 2. The questioning remained sharply focused on attempting to undermine her credibility before the jury. Defense attorneys zeroed in on alleged inconsistencies between her in-court testimony and prior statements made to law enforcement and in civil litigation. They pressed her on precise dates, locations, and details of the alleged trafficking incidents she described, suggesting that elements of her narrative had shifted over time. The defense also highlighted text messages and communications that they argued were inconsistent with the portrayal of coercion and control presented by the government.Throughout the afternoon, Jane Doe 2 maintained her composure but showed visible signs of fatigue under the lengthy and at times repetitive questioning. The defense probed her connections to other accusers and her interactions with civil attorneys, implying possible coordination or financial motivation. Prosecutors objected at several points to the tone and scope of the questioning, but Judge Subramanian largely allowed the cross-examination to proceed. No new evidence was introduced; the session remained centered on testing the consistency and reliability of Jane Doe 2's testimony. The court adjourned with the cross-examination still ongoing, setting the stage for its conclusion in the next session.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 10, 2025 - Day 20 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In this letter to Judge Subramanian regarding the United States v. Combs trial, the defense objects to several exhibits the government intends to introduce during Jane Doe's testimony—specifically, text messages and Notes App entries Jane used as a diary during her relationship with Sean Combs. The defense argues that many of these notes fail to meet the admissibility standards under Rules 801(d)(1)(B) and 803(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. They contend that some notes should be excluded entirely because they were written after Jane read Cassie Ventura's lawsuit and after the government began its investigation, thereby lacking the necessary contemporaneity required under Rule 801(d)(1)(B). The defense also asserts that many of the notes do not meet Rule 803(3)'s standards regarding statements of then-existing mental state and should not be used to improperly guide Jane's direct testimony or bolster her credibility.Additionally, the defense objects to Exhibit C-251, arguing it contains inadmissible hearsay in the form of messages between Jane and Kristina Khorram from December 2023. They also raise a Rule 106 objection concerning the admission of certain text messages without fuller contextual information that could alter their meaning. Finally, the defense opposes the admission of Government Exhibit E-171 on both hearsay grounds and under Rule 403, asserting that its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. The letter urges the Court to prevent what the defense views as improper use of these materials to frame and improperly enhance Jane Doe's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.401.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
ORDER OUR BOOK OUT: HERE Get Enneagram Certified HERE.www.theartofgrowth.org Email us your thoughts and questions! Follow us on Instagram at ArtofGrowth for more on this subject this month and let us know what you are doing. Go to our website to sign up for:Corporate Training One-on-one coaching Enneagram Certification AND MORE...Support the showhttps://www.theartofgrowth.org/
Victim Rights New York's Jennifer Harrison calls in to offer her reaction to Sid's interview with convicted sex offender Harvey Weinstein yesterday, before she dives into the NYC Mayor's race and the battle in the Democratic primary between Andrew Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This episode has been published and can be heard everywhere your podcast is available.Book a One on One coaching session HEREUnchained -https://www.rawmotivations.com/unchainedWant to help support this podcast?https://anchor.fm/rawmotivations/supportListen to the wife's perspective on our new podcast Trauma, Drama & Life:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trauma-drama-life/id1639753152Tune in to hear the perspective of a self aware narcissist.That's me - Ben Taylor a a narcissist in recovery trying to promote awareness, healing, growth and change. I do that by these videos on here, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook.Please reach out to me if you are a: Victim of Narcissistic Abuse -Helping provide closure, reduce guilt and break free from the trauma bond that toxic people imprison you in. Narcissist -I understand you better than you probably understand yourself because I have been there, I am there and I am fighting daily for a better life. You can do that too.From Fantasy to Reality: A Journal for after the Toxic RelationshipGrab yoursHERE.Platforms I am on:TikTok (71k followers) - https://www.tiktok.com/@raw_motivationsInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/rawmotivationsFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/Raw-Motivations-105074738842639/Linkedin -https://www.linkedin.com/in/rawmotivations/YouTube -https://www.youtube.com/c/rawmotivations?sub_confirmation=1
After the lunch break, the courtroom resumed with Jane continuing her emotional testimony. She described a violent confrontation in June 2024, saying Combs had kicked open the bathroom door, thrown her to the ground in the backyard, punched, kicked, dragged her by her hair and choked her—leaving bruises and swelling. She recounted how he then forced her into yet another drug‑fueled “freak‑off” involving a male escort, despite her repeated refusals. As Combs allegedly guided her, he even taunted her with the question: “Is this coercion?Later in the afternoon, the court delved into the fallout after Cassie Ventura's November 2023 lawsuit became public. “Jane” recounted reading the lawsuit and feeling “like I'm reading my own sexual trauma,” nearly fainting as pages mirrored her own experience. The jury listened to two emotionally charged phone calls between her and Combs, where he implored for her friendship, while she voiced feeling manipulated and triggered by the lawsuit's revelations. The session concluded with her tearful statement: “I pray for peace for him," to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:June 9, 2025 - Day 19 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN
After the lunch break, the courtroom resumed with Jane continuing her emotional testimony. She described a violent confrontation in June 2024, saying Combs had kicked open the bathroom door, thrown her to the ground in the backyard, punched, kicked, dragged her by her hair and choked her—leaving bruises and swelling. She recounted how he then forced her into yet another drug‑fueled “freak‑off” involving a male escort, despite her repeated refusals. As Combs allegedly guided her, he even taunted her with the question: “Is this coercion?Later in the afternoon, the court delved into the fallout after Cassie Ventura's November 2023 lawsuit became public. “Jane” recounted reading the lawsuit and feeling “like I'm reading my own sexual trauma,” nearly fainting as pages mirrored her own experience. The jury listened to two emotionally charged phone calls between her and Combs, where he implored for her friendship, while she voiced feeling manipulated and triggered by the lawsuit's revelations. The session concluded with her tearful statement: “I pray for peace for him," to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:June 9, 2025 - Day 19 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN
In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the defense reiterated its renewed objections to the admission of exhibits GXE-331-F-R and GXE-331-H-R, which were introduced during the continued direct examination of the witness “Jane” on June 6, 2025. The defense argued that these exhibits were either improperly authenticated or unfairly prejudicial, lacking the necessary foundation for admission under the Federal Rules of Evidence. They maintained that the government's use of these materials risked misleading the jury and compromising the defendant's right to a fair trial.Additionally, the defense sought to provide broader legal context to guide the Court's rulings on any similar evidentiary issues moving forward. They emphasized the importance of applying a consistent and rigorous standard to the admission of exhibits that could impact witness credibility or the core allegations in the case. The letter urged the Court to sustain the defense's objections and exercise heightened scrutiny to prevent the introduction of unreliable or prejudicial evidence that could unduly influence the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.387.0.pdf
In the morning session, the defense launched an aggressive cross‑examination of the witness known as “Jane,” who resumed her testimony after three days describing alleged drug-fueled “hotel nights” or “freak‑offs” orchestrated by Combs. The defense attorney emphasized moments of affection—highlighting a voice note where Jane called Combs “my crack pipe” and texts expressing gratitude for his financial support, including paying her rent and funding a lease. They pointed out that these interactions suggested love and dependency, questioning whether her involvement had been fully coercive.Judge Subramanian also denied a second mistrial motion, filed by Combs's team, which argued that a previous witness's testimony was false and prejudicial; the judge ruled the trial was proceeding fairly, even going as far as saying that he thought that the defense had a Perry Mason moment during the testimony of Bryana Bongolan. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN
The air in the California courtroom was thick with emotion as a convicted murderer faced the family of his victim during his sentencing.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
After the lunch break, the courtroom resumed with Jane continuing her emotional testimony. She described a violent confrontation in June 2024, saying Combs had kicked open the bathroom door, thrown her to the ground in the backyard, punched, kicked, dragged her by her hair and choked her—leaving bruises and swelling. She recounted how he then forced her into yet another drug‑fueled “freak‑off” involving a male escort, despite her repeated refusals. As Combs allegedly guided her, he even taunted her with the question: “Is this coercion?Later in the afternoon, the court delved into the fallout after Cassie Ventura's November 2023 lawsuit became public. “Jane” recounted reading the lawsuit and feeling “like I'm reading my own sexual trauma,” nearly fainting as pages mirrored her own experience. The jury listened to two emotionally charged phone calls between her and Combs, where he implored for her friendship, while she voiced feeling manipulated and triggered by the lawsuit's revelations. The session concluded with her tearful statement: “I pray for peace for him," to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:June 9, 2025 - Day 19 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the defense reiterated its renewed objections to the admission of exhibits GXE-331-F-R and GXE-331-H-R, which were introduced during the continued direct examination of the witness “Jane” on June 6, 2025. The defense argued that these exhibits were either improperly authenticated or unfairly prejudicial, lacking the necessary foundation for admission under the Federal Rules of Evidence. They maintained that the government's use of these materials risked misleading the jury and compromising the defendant's right to a fair trial.Additionally, the defense sought to provide broader legal context to guide the Court's rulings on any similar evidentiary issues moving forward. They emphasized the importance of applying a consistent and rigorous standard to the admission of exhibits that could impact witness credibility or the core allegations in the case. The letter urged the Court to sustain the defense's objections and exercise heightened scrutiny to prevent the introduction of unreliable or prejudicial evidence that could unduly influence the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.387.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team is seeking a brief adjournment of his upcoming federal sex trafficking trial, citing the government's alleged withholding of approximately 200,000 documents related to witness communications. Prosecutors have accused the defense of "gamesmanship," suggesting the request is a tactic to delay the trial, which is scheduled to begin on May 5. Judge Arun Subramanian has emphasized the importance of adhering to the trial schedule, stating, "We are a freight train moving toward trial," and has given the defense until Wednesday to formally request a pause.The latest indictment against Combs includes new charges alleging he used force, fraud, or coercion to compel a woman, referred to as "Victim-2," into commercial sex acts between 2021 and 2024. Prosecutors claim Combs exploited his celebrity status to orchestrate a network that abused, silenced, and trafficked women, using threats, violence, and intimidation. Despite these additional charges, Combs' attorneys argue that the new indictment introduces no fresh allegations or accusers. Combs has pleaded not guilty and remains held without bail at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy pleads not guilty, lawyers claim 200k documents needed for trial | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
After the lunch break, the courtroom resumed with Jane continuing her emotional testimony. She described a violent confrontation in June 2024, saying Combs had kicked open the bathroom door, thrown her to the ground in the backyard, punched, kicked, dragged her by her hair and choked her—leaving bruises and swelling. She recounted how he then forced her into yet another drug‑fueled “freak‑off” involving a male escort, despite her repeated refusals. As Combs allegedly guided her, he even taunted her with the question: “Is this coercion?Later in the afternoon, the court delved into the fallout after Cassie Ventura's November 2023 lawsuit became public. “Jane” recounted reading the lawsuit and feeling “like I'm reading my own sexual trauma,” nearly fainting as pages mirrored her own experience. The jury listened to two emotionally charged phone calls between her and Combs, where he implored for her friendship, while she voiced feeling manipulated and triggered by the lawsuit's revelations. The session concluded with her tearful statement: “I pray for peace for him," to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:June 9, 2025 - Day 19 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the morning session, the defense launched an aggressive cross‑examination of the witness known as “Jane,” who resumed her testimony after three days describing alleged drug-fueled “hotel nights” or “freak‑offs” orchestrated by Combs. The defense attorney emphasized moments of affection—highlighting a voice note where Jane called Combs “my crack pipe” and texts expressing gratitude for his financial support, including paying her rent and funding a lease. They pointed out that these interactions suggested love and dependency, questioning whether her involvement had been fully coercive.Judge Subramanian also denied a second mistrial motion, filed by Combs's team, which argued that a previous witness's testimony was false and prejudicial; the judge ruled the trial was proceeding fairly, even going as far as saying that he thought that the defense had a Perry Mason moment during the testimony of Bryana Bongolan. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
ExMadam & founder of Sex Workers Anonymous. Jody Williams : Jessica Collins / "Real Epstein Victim" HoaxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-opperman-report--1198501/support.
This episode has been published and can be heard everywhere your podcast is available.Book a One on One coaching session HEREUnchained -https://www.rawmotivations.com/unchainedWant to help support this podcast?https://anchor.fm/rawmotivations/supportListen to the wife's perspective on our new podcast Trauma, Drama & Life:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trauma-drama-life/id1639753152Tune in to hear the perspective of a self aware narcissist.That's me - Ben Taylor a a narcissist in recovery trying to promote awareness, healing, growth and change. I do that by these videos on here, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook.Please reach out to me if you are a: Victim of Narcissistic Abuse -Helping provide closure, reduce guilt and break free from the trauma bond that toxic people imprison you in. Narcissist -I understand you better than you probably understand yourself because I have been there, I am there and I am fighting daily for a better life. You can do that too.From Fantasy to Reality: A Journal for after the Toxic RelationshipGrab yoursHERE.Platforms I am on:TikTok (71k followers) - https://www.tiktok.com/@raw_motivationsInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/rawmotivationsFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/Raw-Motivations-105074738842639/Linkedin -https://www.linkedin.com/in/rawmotivations/YouTube -https://www.youtube.com/c/rawmotivations?sub_confirmation=1
Tucked deep in the woods of northern Georgia, the stone ruins of Corpsewood Manor still whisper secrets—of ambition, isolation, and brutality. In this week's Uncovered episode, host and former law enforcement officer Brian peels back the layers of one of the South's most chilling and misunderstood double homicides.This isn't just a story about murder.It's about fear. Judgment. And the fatal consequences of standing out in a place that demands conformity.
In a gripping morning session, Jane Doe, the second alleged victim to testify, told jurors she was coerced into years of humiliating sexual acts orchestrated by Combs under a veil of manipulation and control. Fighting back tears, she read text messages in which she pleaded for the abuse to stop, including one that said, “It's been three years of me trying to f--- strangers. I'm tired.” The witness described a relationship that began romantically in 2021 but swiftly turned into a cycle of coercion, where Combs allegedly paid her rent and held financial sway over her. He allegedly forced her into drug-fueled “hotel nights” — exploitative sex parties involving third parties — despite her repeated objections. “I told him, ‘I'm not a porn star,'” she testified. “I didn't want to do it.”Jane further detailed how Combs used ecstasy to maintain control over her during extended sex sessions with male escorts and strangers, which he directed for his own gratification. She described the physical toll of these encounters — exhaustion, recurrent urinary tract infections, and ongoing trauma. According to Jane, the coercion was relentless, her financial dependence leveraged against her resistance. The morning's testimony reinforced the prosecution's portrayal of Combs as a manipulative abuser operating behind a facade of glamour and wealth, while also underscoring the emotional and physical damage allegedly suffered by his accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN
In a gripping morning session, Jane Doe, the second alleged victim to testify, told jurors she was coerced into years of humiliating sexual acts orchestrated by Combs under a veil of manipulation and control. Fighting back tears, she read text messages in which she pleaded for the abuse to stop, including one that said, “It's been three years of me trying to f--- strangers. I'm tired.” The witness described a relationship that began romantically in 2021 but swiftly turned into a cycle of coercion, where Combs allegedly paid her rent and held financial sway over her. He allegedly forced her into drug-fueled “hotel nights” — exploitative sex parties involving third parties — despite her repeated objections. “I told him, ‘I'm not a porn star,'” she testified. “I didn't want to do it.”Jane further detailed how Combs used ecstasy to maintain control over her during extended sex sessions with male escorts and strangers, which he directed for his own gratification. She described the physical toll of these encounters — exhaustion, recurrent urinary tract infections, and ongoing trauma. According to Jane, the coercion was relentless, her financial dependence leveraged against her resistance. The morning's testimony reinforced the prosecution's portrayal of Combs as a manipulative abuser operating behind a facade of glamour and wealth, while also underscoring the emotional and physical damage allegedly suffered by his accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN
In a gripping morning session, Jane Doe, the second alleged victim to testify, told jurors she was coerced into years of humiliating sexual acts orchestrated by Combs under a veil of manipulation and control. Fighting back tears, she read text messages in which she pleaded for the abuse to stop, including one that said, “It's been three years of me trying to f--- strangers. I'm tired.” The witness described a relationship that began romantically in 2021 but swiftly turned into a cycle of coercion, where Combs allegedly paid her rent and held financial sway over her. He allegedly forced her into drug-fueled “hotel nights” — exploitative sex parties involving third parties — despite her repeated objections. “I told him, ‘I'm not a porn star,'” she testified. “I didn't want to do it.”Jane further detailed how Combs used ecstasy to maintain control over her during extended sex sessions with male escorts and strangers, which he directed for his own gratification. She described the physical toll of these encounters — exhaustion, recurrent urinary tract infections, and ongoing trauma. According to Jane, the coercion was relentless, her financial dependence leveraged against her resistance. The morning's testimony reinforced the prosecution's portrayal of Combs as a manipulative abuser operating behind a facade of glamour and wealth, while also underscoring the emotional and physical damage allegedly suffered by his accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In a gripping morning session, Jane Doe, the second alleged victim to testify, told jurors she was coerced into years of humiliating sexual acts orchestrated by Combs under a veil of manipulation and control. Fighting back tears, she read text messages in which she pleaded for the abuse to stop, including one that said, “It's been three years of me trying to f--- strangers. I'm tired.” The witness described a relationship that began romantically in 2021 but swiftly turned into a cycle of coercion, where Combs allegedly paid her rent and held financial sway over her. He allegedly forced her into drug-fueled “hotel nights” — exploitative sex parties involving third parties — despite her repeated objections. “I told him, ‘I'm not a porn star,'” she testified. “I didn't want to do it.”Jane further detailed how Combs used ecstasy to maintain control over her during extended sex sessions with male escorts and strangers, which he directed for his own gratification. She described the physical toll of these encounters — exhaustion, recurrent urinary tract infections, and ongoing trauma. According to Jane, the coercion was relentless, her financial dependence leveraged against her resistance. The morning's testimony reinforced the prosecution's portrayal of Combs as a manipulative abuser operating behind a facade of glamour and wealth, while also underscoring the emotional and physical damage allegedly suffered by his accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In this special throwback, I sit down with Tanner Mullen, founder of DripJobs and successful painting business owner, to talk about scaling with the tship, and the power of delegation.We also dive ntoSelf Accountability and why it is important to acknowledge that everything, good or bad, in your business, is your yIf you're still doing everything yourself, and your business is driving you y, this episode is a must.
This episode has been published and can be heard everywhere your podcast is available.Book a One on One coaching session HEREUnchained -https://www.rawmotivations.com/unchainedWant to help support this podcast?https://anchor.fm/rawmotivations/supportListen to the wife's perspective on our new podcast Trauma, Drama & Life:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trauma-drama-life/id1639753152Tune in to hear the perspective of a self aware narcissist.That's me - Ben Taylor a a narcissist in recovery trying to promote awareness, healing, growth and change. I do that by these videos on here, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook.Please reach out to me if you are a: Victim of Narcissistic Abuse -Helping provide closure, reduce guilt and break free from the trauma bond that toxic people imprison you in. Narcissist -I understand you better than you probably understand yourself because I have been there, I am there and I am fighting daily for a better life. You can do that too.From Fantasy to Reality: A Journal for after the Toxic RelationshipGrab yoursHERE.Platforms I am on:TikTok (71k followers) - https://www.tiktok.com/@raw_motivationsInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/rawmotivationsFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/Raw-Motivations-105074738842639/Linkedin -https://www.linkedin.com/in/rawmotivations/YouTube -https://www.youtube.com/c/rawmotivations?sub_confirmation=1
This episode has been published and can be heard everywhere your podcast is available.Book a One on One coaching session HEREUnchained -https://www.rawmotivations.com/unchainedWant to help support this podcast?https://anchor.fm/rawmotivations/supportListen to the wife's perspective on our new podcast Trauma, Drama & Life:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trauma-drama-life/id1639753152Tune in to hear the perspective of a self aware narcissist.That's me - Ben Taylor a a narcissist in recovery trying to promote awareness, healing, growth and change. I do that by these videos on here, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook.Please reach out to me if you are a: Victim of Narcissistic Abuse -Helping provide closure, reduce guilt and break free from the trauma bond that toxic people imprison you in. Narcissist -I understand you better than you probably understand yourself because I have been there, I am there and I am fighting daily for a better life. You can do that too.From Fantasy to Reality: A Journal for after the Toxic RelationshipGrab yoursHERE.Platforms I am on:TikTok (71k followers) - https://www.tiktok.com/@raw_motivationsInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/rawmotivationsFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/Raw-Motivations-105074738842639/Linkedin -https://www.linkedin.com/in/rawmotivations/YouTube -https://www.youtube.com/c/rawmotivations?sub_confirmation=1
In a letter dated June 5, 2025, counsel for "Jane"—a pseudonymous witness in United States v. Sean Combs—formally opposed a request from a group of news organizations seeking to alter the trial schedule to accommodate their desire for pre-redacted exhibits during Jane's testimony. The news outlets had asked the Court to either delay Jane's appearance or require the Government to reorder its witnesses, arguing this would allow them time to review and redact sensitive exhibits in advance. Jane's legal team objected to this request, emphasizing that any such adjustment would cause unnecessary delay and disrupt the carefully planned sequence of the Government's case.The letter underscored the importance of protecting Jane's safety and anonymity, which had already been granted by the Court, and argued that forcing a delay or a change in witness order to serve media access interests would place an undue burden on both the witness and the integrity of the trial. Jane's counsel maintained that the existing procedures—including real-time redaction and controlled access to sensitive materials—were sufficient to balance the media's rights with the paramount need to shield Jane from further harm or unwanted exposure. The letter urged the Court to reject the news organizations' request and allow Jane's testimony to proceed as scheduled.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.380.0.pdf
Convicted quadruple murderer Lori Vallow is finally facing charges in the attempted murder of her ex-nephew-in-law, Brandon Boudreaux, in Maricopa County, Arizona. Lori has chosen to represent herself in this matter. We are streaming the trial over at True Crime Squad Trials and will discuss the trial daily here.Join our squad! Kristi and Katie share true crime stories and give you actionable things you can do to help, all with a wicked sense of humor.Follow our True Crime Trials Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeSquadTrialsFollow our True Crime Shorts Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeSquadShorts-t6iWant to Support our work and get extra perks?https://buymeacoffee.com/truecrimesquadLooking for extra content?https://www.patreon.com/truecrimesquad*Social Media Links*Facebook: www.facebook.com/truecrimesquadFacebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/215774426330767Website: https://www.truecrimesquad.comTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@truecrimesquadBlueSky- https://bsky.app/profile/truecrimesquad.bsky.social True Crime Squad on Spotifyhttps://open.spotify.com/show/5gIPqBHJLftbXdRgs1Bqm1
The woman called Victim-2 in the government's third superseding indictment -- she's using a pseudonym to testify -- was dating him until his arrest last fall. She alleges he coerced her into a version of the sexual performances Cassie Ventura has testified about. She testified that Combs was paying her rent, and when she told him she didn't want to perform sexually anymore, he told her he'd stop the payments.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy
Five Disturbing Details From Diddy's Jane Testimony That Could End His Freedom Forever The Sean "Diddy" Combs federal sex trafficking trial took a devastating turn on June 5th, 2025, when a key witness known as "Jane" delivered testimony that could determine the music mogul's fate. In this comprehensive breakdown, we analyze the most damaging moments from Jane's testimony, including her explosive revelation that she told Combs "many times" she didn't want to participate in alleged sexual encounters with male escorts. Jane, identified as Victim-2 in the federal indictment, testified about a sophisticated financial control scheme where Combs allegedly paid $10,000 monthly rent for her home while providing $5,000-$10,000 monthly allowances. This wasn't generosity - prosecutors argue it was a calculated trap designed to create economic dependency that forced compliance with sexual demands. The testimony revealed disturbing details about "hotel nights" - elaborate sexual encounters where Jane was allegedly forced to have sex with male escorts while Combs watched. These events reportedly consumed "two dozen bottles of baby oil per night" and required Jane to wear "provocative lingerie and really high stripper shoes." Most crucially, Jane testified she repeatedly expressed unwillingness to participate, using the phrase "many times" when asked how often she told Combs she didn't want to engage in these activities. Federal prosecutors presented documentary evidence including lease agreements, wire transfer records, and text message communications that allegedly show a pattern of financial coercion. This evidence could prove the difference between consensual adult activity and federal sex trafficking charges that carry potential life imprisonment. The courtroom implemented extraordinary security measures, with Judge Arun Subramanian completely disabling public video feeds to protect Jane's identity. This unprecedented move highlights both the sensitivity of the testimony and potential safety concerns for witnesses in this high-profile case. We break down the legal significance of Jane's testimony, analyze the defense team's preparation struggles, and explain why this single day of testimony could prove pivotal in determining whether one of hip-hop's biggest moguls spends the rest of his life in federal prison. #DiddyTrial #SexTrafficking #FederalTrial #TrueCrime #SeanCombs #CourtUpdate #LegalAnalysis #JusticeSystem #CriminalCase #BreakingNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Five Disturbing Details From Diddy's Jane Testimony That Could End His Freedom Forever The Sean "Diddy" Combs federal sex trafficking trial took a devastating turn on June 5th, 2025, when a key witness known as "Jane" delivered testimony that could determine the music mogul's fate. In this comprehensive breakdown, we analyze the most damaging moments from Jane's testimony, including her explosive revelation that she told Combs "many times" she didn't want to participate in alleged sexual encounters with male escorts. Jane, identified as Victim-2 in the federal indictment, testified about a sophisticated financial control scheme where Combs allegedly paid $10,000 monthly rent for her home while providing $5,000-$10,000 monthly allowances. This wasn't generosity - prosecutors argue it was a calculated trap designed to create economic dependency that forced compliance with sexual demands. The testimony revealed disturbing details about "hotel nights" - elaborate sexual encounters where Jane was allegedly forced to have sex with male escorts while Combs watched. These events reportedly consumed "two dozen bottles of baby oil per night" and required Jane to wear "provocative lingerie and really high stripper shoes." Most crucially, Jane testified she repeatedly expressed unwillingness to participate, using the phrase "many times" when asked how often she told Combs she didn't want to engage in these activities. Federal prosecutors presented documentary evidence including lease agreements, wire transfer records, and text message communications that allegedly show a pattern of financial coercion. This evidence could prove the difference between consensual adult activity and federal sex trafficking charges that carry potential life imprisonment. The courtroom implemented extraordinary security measures, with Judge Arun Subramanian completely disabling public video feeds to protect Jane's identity. This unprecedented move highlights both the sensitivity of the testimony and potential safety concerns for witnesses in this high-profile case. We break down the legal significance of Jane's testimony, analyze the defense team's preparation struggles, and explain why this single day of testimony could prove pivotal in determining whether one of hip-hop's biggest moguls spends the rest of his life in federal prison. #DiddyTrial #SexTrafficking #FederalTrial #TrueCrime #SeanCombs #CourtUpdate #LegalAnalysis #JusticeSystem #CriminalCase #BreakingNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Do your inner stories hold you back? Jason and Matt, coaches at Alcohol-Free Lifestyle, talk about these powerful hidden stories. Often, these stories shape our lives without us even knowing it. They look at how we might see ourselves in unhelpful ways, like a Villain, a Victim, or as Helpless. Learn how these inner thoughts can really affect our lives, especially our relationship with alcohol and our happiness. You can find simple ways to change these unhelpful thoughts. Rewrite your inner story to feel stronger and more in control. Jason and Matt talk about knowing yourself better and writing your thoughts down. They also discuss how your words and even your breathing can make a difference. Taking responsibility for your life is a big step. It helps you move from feeling helpless or like a victim to becoming the hero of your own story. Learn how to use tough times for good, and build a strong, positive outlook by trying these things regularly. Download my FREE guide: The Alcohol Freedom Formula For Over 30s Entrepreneurs & High Performers: https://social.alcoholfreelifestyle.com/podcast ★ - Learn more about Project 90: www.alcoholfreelifestyle.com/Project90 ★ - (Accountability & Support) Speak verbally to a certified Alcohol-Free Lifestyle coach to see if, or how, we could support you having a better relationship with alcohol: https://www.alcoholfreelifestyle.com/schedule ★ - The wait is over – My new book “CLEAR” is now available. Get your copy here: https://www.alcoholfreelifestyle.com/clear
This episode has been published and can be heard everywhere your podcast is available.Book a One on One coaching session HEREUnchained -https://www.rawmotivations.com/unchainedWant to help support this podcast?https://anchor.fm/rawmotivations/supportListen to the wife's perspective on our new podcast Trauma, Drama & Life:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trauma-drama-life/id1639753152Tune in to hear the perspective of a self aware narcissist.That's me - Ben Taylor a a narcissist in recovery trying to promote awareness, healing, growth and change. I do that by these videos on here, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook.Please reach out to me if you are a: Victim of Narcissistic Abuse -Helping provide closure, reduce guilt and break free from the trauma bond that toxic people imprison you in. Narcissist -I understand you better than you probably understand yourself because I have been there, I am there and I am fighting daily for a better life. You can do that too.From Fantasy to Reality: A Journal for after the Toxic RelationshipGrab yoursHERE.Platforms I am on:TikTok (71k followers) - https://www.tiktok.com/@raw_motivationsInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/rawmotivationsFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/Raw-Motivations-105074738842639/Linkedin -https://www.linkedin.com/in/rawmotivations/YouTube -https://www.youtube.com/c/rawmotivations?sub_confirmation=1
“He was interviewed nine times. Survivors named him. And still, he kept killing.”This week on The Guilty Files: ReVisited, Brian and Dani return to one of the most infamous failures in criminal investigation history—the Yorkshire Ripper case. But this isn't a retelling. It's a reckoning.From the fog-soaked streets of 1970s Yorkshire to the modern courtroom of public opinion, this co-hosted episode pulls no punches.Brian dissects the procedural breakdowns, institutional ego, and flawed profiling that allowed Peter Sutcliffe to evade capture—even after survivors identified him by name. Dani peels back the psychological and sociological layers, asking how cultural bias, gendered assumptions, and classism created the perfect storm for a serial predator to hide in plain sight.Along the way, the hosts share their own frontline story—recalling a moment from their careers in Atlanta when a citywide riot left them without leadership or support.The eerie parallels to the command breakdowns in the Ripper investigation? Unmistakable.Inside this episode:How missed leads and media distractions cost livesWhy survivors were ignored—and what that says about who we listen toWhat we still get wrong about “monsters”And how trauma doesn't end with an arrest—it evolves across generationsThis is more than a case file. It's a confrontation with complicity.And just when you think it's over—Brian and Dani ask the ultimate question: What systems are we still clinging to today that we'll one day look back on in shame?
On the afternoon of June 5, 2025, during Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial in Manhattan, a woman testifying under the pseudonym "Jane" recounted harrowing experiences from their relationship, which began in late 2020. She described being coerced into participating in prolonged, drug-fueled sexual encounters, termed "hotel nights" or "freak-offs," often involving male escorts and excessive use of baby oil—sometimes up to two dozen bottles in a single session. These events, she testified, were orchestrated by Combs, who would direct the activities while observing and masturbating. Jane detailed how she was expected to wear specific attire, such as provocative lingerie and high heels, and adhere to Combs' preferences regarding her appearance, including hair and nail styles. Despite expressing her discomfort and repeatedly telling Combs that she did not want to engage in sex with other men, she felt compelled to comply due to his financial control over her, including paying her rent and providing substantial cash payments.Jane's testimony aligns with earlier accounts from other witnesses, including singer Cassie Ventura and former assistant "Mia," who have accused Combs of similar patterns of abuse and coercion. During her emotional testimony, Jane spoke softly, often avoiding eye contact with Combs, who was present in the courtroom. The proceedings were marked by heightened tension, especially after Judge Arun Subramanian admonished Combs for attempting to interact with the jury through nods and facial expressions, warning that any further misconduct could result in his removal from the courtroom. The trial, now in its fourth week, continues to delve into allegations that Combs used his influence and resources to exploit women over a span of two decadesto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 5, 2025 - Day 17 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN
It is an uphill battle for "Jane" to maintain her anonymity in the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial due to the extraordinary public interest and media scrutiny surrounding the case. The combination of Combs' celebrity status, the severity of the charges—racketeering, sex trafficking, and related offenses—and the cultural weight of the #MeToo movement has turned this trial into a national spectacle. Every courtroom development is being live-blogged, dissected on social media, and aggressively pursued by entertainment outlets, making it difficult for any witness to avoid public exposure. Additionally, "Jane" has provided some of the most graphic and emotionally charged testimony thus far, implicating Combs in deeply disturbing acts that drive the government's core narrative of coercion and abuse. Her role is so central that her testimony is likely to be the subject of intense post-trial analysis and media pursuit, increasing the risk of her identity leaking through unofficial channels even if the court maintains a protective order.Moreover, federal courtrooms, unlike many state courts, do not allow video recording or live broadcasting, which does offer some protection. However, this is counterbalanced by the aggressive reporting of major outlets and the presence of numerous journalists in the courtroom, all eager to unearth every detail about the key witnesses. The very nature of "Jane's" testimony—recounting intimate and traumatic experiences—has already made her a figure of intense curiosity. Compounding this, her prior relationship with Combs, her visibility in the New York nightlife scene, and mentions of specific events and dates in testimony create a breadcrumb trail that determined parties, whether members of the press or online sleuths, could follow to uncover her real identity. In such a high-profile case, history shows that anonymity is difficult to preserve once public and media obsession reaches a certain pitch.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Who is Jane? Diddy trial's anonymous witness testifies
On the afternoon of June 5, 2025, during Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial in Manhattan, a woman testifying under the pseudonym "Jane" recounted harrowing experiences from their relationship, which began in late 2020. She described being coerced into participating in prolonged, drug-fueled sexual encounters, termed "hotel nights" or "freak-offs," often involving male escorts and excessive use of baby oil—sometimes up to two dozen bottles in a single session. These events, she testified, were orchestrated by Combs, who would direct the activities while observing and masturbating. Jane detailed how she was expected to wear specific attire, such as provocative lingerie and high heels, and adhere to Combs' preferences regarding her appearance, including hair and nail styles. Despite expressing her discomfort and repeatedly telling Combs that she did not want to engage in sex with other men, she felt compelled to comply due to his financial control over her, including paying her rent and providing substantial cash payments.Jane's testimony aligns with earlier accounts from other witnesses, including singer Cassie Ventura and former assistant "Mia," who have accused Combs of similar patterns of abuse and coercion. During her emotional testimony, Jane spoke softly, often avoiding eye contact with Combs, who was present in the courtroom. The proceedings were marked by heightened tension, especially after Judge Arun Subramanian admonished Combs for attempting to interact with the jury through nods and facial expressions, warning that any further misconduct could result in his removal from the courtroom. The trial, now in its fourth week, continues to delve into allegations that Combs used his influence and resources to exploit women over a span of two decadesto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 5, 2025 - Day 17 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The embarrassment that has become High School graduation ceremonies.Wayzata graduation shooting suspect faces stiffer sentence after prosecutor filingThe Hennepin County Attorney's Office will seek an enhanced sentence against the man suspected of shooting two people following the Wayzata High School graduation ceremony at Mariucci Arena in Minneapolis.Hamza Abdirashid Said, 20, of Coon Rapids, is charged with first-degree assault, second-degree assault, and possessing/operating a machine gun in connection to the May 30 shooting.The Hennepin County Attorney's Office filed a "notice of intent to seek an upward sentencing departure" in the shooting that injured two people outside the Wayzata High School graduation ceremony at Mariucci Arena in Minneapolis.This means prosecutors will seek a legal penalty that goes beyond the state's typical sentencing guidelines. The filing states that the victims in the shooting "were particularly vulnerable based on the location of the incident on a university campus," adding that "the Victims were particularly vulnerable based on the large scale of attendees at the public event, besides the intended Victim there were numerous people present besides the intended victims and Defendant created greater-than-normal danger to the safety of these other people."The document states that the "sentencing departure issues should be decided by the trial jury." The maximum sentence for first-degree assault in Minnesota is 20 years. Trans pitcher hits 2 doubles, throws another complete game to send team to Minnesota state championshipSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Eddie Garcia, who worked security at the hotel where Sean Combs was caught on video beating Cassie Ventura in a hallway, testified that Combs paid $100,000 for what he thought was the only copy of it. He also said on the stand that Combs called him "my angel." Plus an outburst by a Diddy supporter in the courtroom, and the judge puts restrictions on exhibits after Victim-4 is named publicly.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy
What if the greatest obstacle to reaching your potential isn't external barriers, but a mindset in which you see yourself as a victim? Today, I'm stoked to welcome back my good friend and one of my favorite thinkers, Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman. This is Scott's third time on the podcast, and he always delivers. Scott is a humanistic psychologist, bestselling author, and host of The Psychology Podcast. His new book Rise Above: Overcome a Victim Mindset, Empower Yourself, and Realize Your Full Potential dives deep into what it means to move through suffering with both self-awareness and strength.In this conversation, we talk about the difference between victimization and a victim mindset, how subtle thought patterns like hostile attribution bias or over-personalization can limit growth, and why a mindset rooted in empowerment is the key to self-actualization.As you listen, reflect on your own internal narratives…. Maybe even the core triggers for when you tend to blame, deflect, or shrink back when things get hard? How might a shift toward a more powerful mindset — toward a deeper trust in yourself — change how you respond to life's challenges? Please enjoy this powerful conversation with my friend, Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman.__________________Subscribe to our Youtube Channel for more powerful conversations at the intersection of high performance, leadership, and meaning: https://www.youtube.com/c/FindingMasteryGet exclusive discounts and support our amazing sponsors! Go to: https://findingmastery.com/sponsors/Subscribe to the Finding Mastery newsletter for weekly high performance insights: https://www.findingmastery.com/newsletterDownload Dr. Mike's Morning Mindset Routine!Follow on YouTube, Instagram, LinkedIn, and XScott Barry Kaufman: https://scottbarrykaufman.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.