Podcasts about objectionable

In this episode, Paul was asked to comment on an installation that inspectors are forcing the installation of a green bonding conductor between the meter enclosure and the service equipment. Since a neutral is already connected at each end of this installer, as permitted in 250.142 and as required by 250.24, the question being raised is about the parallel paths for return current and the pesky objectionable current argument.Well, on this episode I dig into both and give my opinion. Listen as Paul Abernathy, CEO, and Founder of Electrical Code Academy, Inc., the leading electrical educator in the country, discusses electrical code, electrical trade, and electrical business-related topics to help electricians maximize their knowledge and industry investment.If you are looking to learn more about the National Electrical Code, for electrical exam preparation, or to better your knowledge of the NEC then visit https://fasttraxsystem.com for all the electrical code training you will ever need by the leading electrical educator in the country with the best NEC learning program on the planet.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/ask-paul-national-electrical-code--4971115/support.

In this episode, Paul was asked to comment on an installation that inspectors are forcing the installation of a green bonding conductor between the meter enclosure and the service equipment. Since a neutral is already connected at each end of this installer, as permitted in 250.142 and as required by 250.24, the question being raised is about the parallel paths for return current and the pesky objectionable current argument.Well, on this episode I dig into both and give my opinion. Listen as Paul Abernathy, CEO, and Founder of Electrical Code Academy, Inc., the leading electrical educator in the country, discusses electrical code, electrical trade, and electrical business-related topics to help electricians maximize their knowledge and industry investment.If you are looking to learn more about the National Electrical Code, for electrical exam preparation, or to better your knowledge of the NEC then visit https://fasttraxsystem.com for all the electrical code training you will ever need by the leading electrical educator in the country with the best NEC learning program on the planet.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/ask-paul-national-electrical-code--4971115/support.

Selling Dead People's Things is a wry behind-the-curtain peek into the world of antiques and their obsessive owners—while still alive and after their passing.   An amusing observer of the human condition, author Duane Scott Cerny entertains in illuminating, scary, sad, or frightfully funny resale tales and essays. Whether processing the estate of a hoarding beekeeper, disassembling the retro remains of an infamous haunted hospital, or conducting an impromptu appraisal during a shiva gone disturbingly wrong, every day is a twisted treasure hunt for this 21st-century antiques dealer.  While digging deep into the basements, attics, and souls of the most interesting collectors imaginable, traveling from one odd house call to the curious next, resale predicaments will confound your every turn. Be careful where you step, watch what you touch, and gird your heart—Antiques Roadshow, this ain't!   The Dybbuk box, or Dibbuk box (Hebrew: קופסת דיבוק, romanized: Kufsat Dibbuk), is a wine-cabinet claimed to be haunted by a dybbuk, a concept from Jewish mythology. The box gained notoriety when it was auctioned off on eBayby owner Kevin Mannis, who created a story featuring Jewish Holocaust survivors and paranormal claims as part of his eBay item description. Mannis' story was the inspiration for the 2012 horror film The Possession. In 2021, Mannis told Input magazine that the Dybbuk Box story was entirely fictional.Follow Our Other ShowsFollow UFO WitnessesFollow Crime Watch WeeklyFollow Paranormal FearsFollow Seven: Disturbing Chronicle StoriesJoin our Patreon for ad-free listening and more bonus content.Follow us on Instagram @mysteriousradioFollow us on TikTok mysteriousradioTikTok Follow us on Twitter @mysteriousradio Follow us on Pinterest pinterest.com/mysteriousradio Like us on Facebook Facebook.com/mysteriousradio]

Objectionable, violent, bullying and gang behaviour in public schools in Canada. As well, questions being raised by parents about children in grades 3, 4 and 5 being taught about suicide in their school classrooms. Parents are increasingly turning to homeschooling for their children. In Alberta, homeschooling has a precise methodology for homeschooling which we will investigate. Guests:  Catherine Scott, a teacher with the Centre for Learning at Home to whom parents who homeschool have access for teaching-related questions. Karla Hersey. Mother to four children who chose to homeschool from the very beginning. Lindsay Wilson. Chose to homeschool after her children attended the public school system.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This is an AI generated discussion about my post, "Why Do We Find 'Objections' So Objectionable?"  The original post can be found here:  https://partnersinexcellenceblog.com/why-do-we-find-objections-so-objectionable

Obscenity Is Objectionable Not Because... Gita 05.22 by Exploring mindfulness, yoga and spirituality

Jack Logar and Nikki Drake wrap up vacation talk with a look at what you forgot, discuss ways to deal with objectionable people and consider the story of the parking lot knuckle sandwich. 

In the dawn of a young publishers' life, they focus on their own tastes. Gradually, they see which books are well-received and branch outward. Some publishers quickly find that the most popular books are things that aren't exactly the reason that they got into publishing! So this week on the pod, we talk about the limits of a press' curation and why that's important.************Thank you for watching the People's Guide to Publishing vlogcast!  Get the book: https://microcosmpublishing.com/catalog/books/3663Get the workbook: https://microcosmpublishing.com/catalog/zines/10031More from Microcosm: http://microcosmpublishing.comMore by Joe Biel: http://joebiel.netMore by Elly Blue: http://takingthelane.comSubscribe to our monthly email newsletter: https://confirmsubscription.com/h/r/0EABB2040D281C9CFind us on social mediaFacebook: http://facebook.com/microcosmpublishingTwitter: http://twitter.com/microcosmmmInstagram: http://instagram.com/microcosm_pub************

Monday, May 20, 2024 Subscribe: Get the Daily Update in your inbox for free 1/ The International Criminal Court will seek arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. A panel of three judges will decide whether to is... Visit WTF Just Happened Today? for more news and headlines, brought to you by Matt Kiser. The WTFJHT Podcast is narrated and produced by Joe Amditis.

The lesson includes numerous instances of encouragement of students to accept and affirm false pronouns and identities. Constitutional expert, lawyer, author, pastor, and founder of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver discusses the important topics of the day with co-hosts and guests that impact life, liberty, and family. To stay informed and get involved, visit LC.org. 

The facility's institutional review board failed to report a 2021 incident and “serious and ongoing noncompliance” by a principal investigator, according to a letter released by the federal agency this week.

The facility's institutional review board failed to report a 2021 incident and “serious and ongoing noncompliance” by a principal investigator, according to a letter released by the federal agency this week.

Katie Porter or Adam SchiffSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

C. Thi Nguyen is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Utah and the author of the incredible book "Games: Agency as Art." In this episode, Thi delves into his theory of games as an art form that revolves around agency. His website, Objectionable.net, showcases an extensive collection of published papers on games, the philosophy of technology, and other intriguing topics. My conversation with Thi digs into the essence of games—exploring their power, addictiveness, and how game concepts can be applied to enhance your daily life. Don't miss this episode for a thought-provoking journey into the philosophy of games with Thi Nguyen.Visit http://justingarydesign.com/ for show notes, game design lessons, and more! Get full access to Think Like A Game Designer at justingarydesign.substack.com/subscribe

In today's episode Jim Garrity answers a question that vexes many litigators relating to corporate representative depositions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) when the lawyers sharply disagree on the propriety of the topics. Is is better to seek court relief before - or after - the 30(b)(6) deposition? And, assuming it's proper to seek a protective order either before or after, is one better than the other, and why?Thanks for listening! Be sure to check out the show notes, which contain the research on which this episode is based, as well as citations to model motions for protective order and model responses in opposition.Now - would you take a moment and leave a five-star review wherever you access this podcast? Those great ratings and comments are deeply appreciated by me and our production staff. Thank you so much.SHOW NOTESAgreed to Rule Before DepoIn re Deepwater Horizon BELO Cases, 3:21-cv-3287, 2023 WL 9229118 (N. D. Fla. Sept. 5, 2023) (court, acknowledging split in authority on whether protective order should be sought before or after 30(b)(6) deposition, agreed to rule on motion for protective order, in dispute over topics, before deposition, citing multitude of discovery disputes between parties already and length of time cases have been pending)Florida v. United States, 342 F.R.D. 153 (N. D. Fla. 2022) (court agreed to rule on motion for protective order before 30(b)(6) deposition, saying that based on “the briefing and telephone hearing,” court had sufficient basis to rule on the motion; also collecting cases on split in thinking about when protective order should be sought)Fed. Deposition Ins. Corp. v. Brudnicki, No. 5:12-cv-00396, 2013 WL 5814494, at *2 (N. D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2013) (court agreed to rule on dueling motion for protective order/motion to compel before 30(b)(6) deposition, but stating that disputes should be resolved and narrowed by the lawyers, and then presented to the court following the deposition if needed)Miles v. United States, No. 3:14cv360, 2015 WL 11109793, at *2-3 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 19, 2015) (ruling on, but refusing to issue, advance protective order that would limit topics to be covered during Rule 30(b)(6) deposition)Santos v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 8:17-CV-2588, 2018 WL 3391330, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 2, 2018) (issuing protective order to prevent inquiry into certain topics during Rule 30(b)(6) deposition)EEOC v. Austal USA, LLC, No. CV 1:18-00416, 2019 WL 11201138, at *1 (S.D. Ala. July 1, 2019) (ruling on, but denying, protective order that would have limited topics for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition)Declined to Rule Before DepositionBoukardougha v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 6:22-CV-2002-WWB-RMN, 2023 WL 6280439, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 26, 2023) (Court declines to rule on topics prior to deposition, citing “the limited briefing before the Court” and “Defendant's belated filing,” and, further, finding that the court “cannot say that the topics in the deposition notice are wholly irrelevant to Plaintiff's claims or to claims that Plaintiff may bring against Defendant. Evidence is relevant if it has “any tendency” to make a fact of consequence “more or less probable”)New World Network Ltd. v. M/V Norwegian Sea, No. 05-22916-CIV, 2007 WL 1068124, at*4 (S. D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2007)(denying in part motion seeking protective order before deposition, holding that 30(b)(6) depositions come with no special privilege for advanced court rulings on questions to be asked in a deposition, and that a protective order or motion to compel should be sought after the deposition takes place)OtherKing v. Pratt & Whitney, a Div. of United Techs. Corp., 161 F.R.D. 475, 476 (S.D. Fla. 1995), aff'd sub nom. King v. Pratt & Whitney, 213 F.3d 646 (11th Cir. 2000), and aff'd sub nom. King v. Pratt & Whitney, 213 F.3d 647 (11th Cir. 2000) (questions beyond the designated topics in a 30(b)(6) deposition may be posed to the designee, in which case the designee is no longer speaking for the entity but in a personal capacity)Sample Motions for Protective OrderDefendant's Emergency Motion for Protective Order [Doc. 642, filed Aug. 22, 2023], In re Deepwater Horizon BELO Cases, Case No. 3:19-cv-00963-MCR-HTC (N. D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2019) (excellent example of sample motion for protective order on 30(b)(6) notice)Defendant's Motion for Protective Order, [Doc. 57, filed July 1, 2022], State of Florida v. United States of America, Case No. 3:21-cv-01066-TKW-ZCB (N. D. Fla. Sept. 29, 2021) (same)Sample Oppositions to Motions for Protective OrderPlaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Emergency Motion for Protective Order [Doc. 644, filed Aug. 30, 2023], In re Deepwater Horizon BELO Cases, Case No. 3:19-cv-00963-MCR-HTC (N. D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2019) (excellent example of sample opposition to preemptive motion for protective order on 30(b)(6) notice)Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion for Protective Order [Doc. 59, filed July 7, 2022] State of Florida v. United States of America, Case No. 3:21-cv-01066-TKW-ZCB (N. D. Fla. Sept. 29, 2021) (same)Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (addressing motions for protective orders)

In this episode we WadeOutThere with Thi Nguyen, from Salt Lake City, Utah.  As long as Thi can remember he has had a love of all kinds of games.  Thi was raised in California, studied philosophy in school, and moved to Utah to work as a philosophy professor at the University of Utah.He started fly fishing to help counteract some of the negative aspects of the new remote teaching environment that arose during the pandemic, and fell in love with the sport and its congruence with his work in the philosophy of games.  He is the author of the book, Games: Agency as Art.  This episode is a deep dive into the philosophy of fly fishing.  We discuss why we play the game of fly fishing, how fly fishing can be an infinite game, and a little bit about Thi's experience learning to fish on the Provo River.To learn more about Thi and the topics we discussed in this episode, check out the following links:Twitter:  @add_hawkThi's website: Objectionable.netGames: Agency as ArtShow notes + MORENewsletter Sign-UpView Jason's ArtworkThanks for listening.VR- Jason

Thank you for giving this week's episode of the Albany Update a listen. In this week's program we report on a children's book distributor that is selling pornographic materials to kids at school book fairs. Second, the crazy continues. Governor Kathy Hochul signed legislation that conceals a convict's record from people like employers and landlords who might want to know about it. Next up, the state is considering legalizing casino gambling on mobile devices. Then, how about some good news? The American Medical Association is holding the line against physician-assisted suicide. Finally, let's reflect on that first Thanksgiving and learn a lesson for this week's holiday in the process. Let's get started. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/albanyupdate/support

Misty and the Hand Shandy. Crossing the Celebrity Prostitute Streams. Declare Your Poop! 1-900-ANNOYING-PUPPETS. Party All The Time And Something In Your Butt. R.O.L.A.I.D.S spells Funktastic. Crappy Jewelry. If you can't see the puppets, it's just a guy doing a dumb voice. Organ Transitions. Depressing Buttons. What happens on TV at 2 AM nowadays? A bird murdermuration. The Chuddening! A Little Stymie. That time of the month with TVs Travis and more on this episode of The Morning Stream. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Misty and the Hand Shandy. Crossing the Celebrity Prostitute Streams. Declare Your Poop! 1-900-ANNOYING-PUPPETS. Party All The Time And Something In Your Butt. R.O.L.A.I.D.S spells Funktastic. Crappy Jewelry. If you can't see the puppets, it's just a guy doing a dumb voice. Organ Transitions. Depressing Buttons. What happens on TV at 2 AM nowadays? A bird murdermuration. The Chuddening! A Little Stymie. That time of the month with TVs Travis and more on this episode of The Morning Stream. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, we discuss the issue of publication bias. We discuss issues like: Do we learn anything from null results, given the current state of research practices? Is poorly done research still worth sharing with the scientific community? And how can we move toward a system where null results are informative and worth publishing?   Shownotes Bones, A. K. (2012). We Knew the Future All Along Scientific Hypothesizing is Much More Accurate Than Other Forms of Precognition—A Satire in One Part. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 307–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612441216 Carter, E. C., & McCullough, M. E. (2014). Publication bias and the limited strength model of self-control: Has the evidence for ego depletion been overestimated? Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823 Greenwald, A. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076157 Fidler, F., Singleton Thorn, F., Barnett, A., Kambouris, S., & Kruger, A. (2018). The epistemic importance of establishing the absence of an effect. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 237-244. Pickett, J. T., & Roche, S. P. (2017). Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9886-2 Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M. R. M. J., & Lakens, D. (2021). An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), 25152459211007468. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467 Sterling, T. D. (1959). Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—Or Vice Versa. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54(285), 30–34. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2282137 The FDA Trial tracker to see which trials have not shared their results: https://fdaaa.trialstracker.net/   

The Way of the Samurai by Inazo Nitobe w/John Hill aka Small Mountain--- Welcome & Introduction  - 00:23 Inazo Nitobe on Politeness - 02:50 Why Be Polite? - 08:47 Scaling up Politeness - 17:00 Tying Politeness to Empathy - 20:35 Does Atomization Lead to an Increase in Empathy - 25:40 "No Society Can Survive Anonymity in Communication" - 27:16 15% of Jesan Sorrells's Over 26K Tweets are Objectionable - 28:15 The Problem of the Logos - 30:00 Giving Grace and the Benefit of the Doubt - 34:00 The 'Hot Take' is Probably Wrong - 35:17 Pulling Meaning From Disorder - 43:00 The Literary Life of Inazo Nitobe - 46:00 Revere the Past and Admire the Deeds of the Samurai - 50:00 It is Important to Develop Insights and Wisdom Rather than Mere Knowledge - 54:00 We are in a Period of Transitional Change - 1:01:08 How Does a Leader Build the Right Culture in a Remote Environment - 1:05:10 No one Knows Who the President of the US is - 1:12:00 Leaders Provide Context - 1:20:00 A Loose Business Morality - 1:23:40 ESG, Virtue Signaling, and Leadership Discipline - 1:27:00 'My First Thought Was He Lied in Every Word' - 1:33:48 Misusing Martial Arts Metaphors - 1:41:42 Salvador Dali Doesn't Want to Talk to a Gallery Owner - 1:45:00 If You're Opening a Restaurant, You Need a Chef - 1:50:00 You Have Forever To Go Out on Your Own - 1:55:00 Sources of Bushido - 2:00:00 Wholly Militant and Wholly Resistant - 2:06:45 Jocko's Book is a "Top Shelf" Book - 2:13:00 Staying on the Path - 1:39:00 --- Read John Hill's Book, Selling From Scratch - https://www.amazon.com/Selling-Scratch-Simply-Being-Human-ebook/dp/B097CM5BQ2 Connect with John Hill on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnblanehill/  Check out Peter Zeihan and Zeihan on Geopolitics - https://zeihan.com/ --- Leadership Lessons From The Great Books, Episode #21 - A Book of Five Rings by Miyamoto Musashi w/John Hill aka Small Mountain Leadership Lessons From The Great Books, Episode #21 - A Book of Five Rings by Miyamoto Musashi w/John Hill aka Small Mountain (YouTube) Pick up your copy of 12 Rules for Leaders: The Foundation of Intentional Leadership NOW on AMAZON! Check out the 2022 Leadership Lessons From the Great Books podcast reading list! --- Check out HSCT Publishing at: https://www.hsctpublishing.com/. Check out LeadingKeys at: https://www.leadingkeys.com/ Check out Leadership ToolBox at: https://leadershiptoolbox.us/ Contact HSCT for more information at 1-833-216-8296 to schedule a full DEMO of LeadingKeys with one of our team members. --- Leadership ToolBox website: https://leadershiptoolbox.us/. Leadership ToolBox LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ldrshptlbx/. Leadership ToolBox YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvVbIU_bSEflwYpd9lWXuA/. Leadership ToolBox Twitter: https://twitter.com/ldrshptlbx. Leadership ToolBox IG: https://www.instagram.com/leadershiptoolboxus/. Leadership ToolBox FB: https://www.facebook.com/LdrshpTlbx.

"You Can Learn Leadership From Anything and Anyone," w/Tom Libby --- Welcome & Introduction  - 00:23 Learning Hard Lessons From Paper Leaders - 02:40 Introducing Thomas Libby - 04:00 Leadership Consistency and Time - 05:30 This Podcast is Fundamentally Different from Anything Else Out There - 08:30 You Can Learn from Anyone - 09:30 Lawrence of Arabia, Episode #40 - 11:00 Controversy Comes When You're Inconsistent - 13:40 At Least 15% of My 26K Tweets are Objectionable - 15:00 Context Matters for Determining Leadership Truth - 16:40 Let's Leave Up Robert E. Lee's Statue - 19:30 Christopher Columbus as the Original American Start-Up Founder - 20:37 The Anti-Federalist Papers, Episode #29 - 24:50 Leadership Education - 27:00 Can You Separate Leadership From the Leader? - 30:20 Bryan Cranston, Plato, and Malcolm in the Middle - 34:00 Leadership Art and Science - 36:00 Trial By Error and Magellan's Journey - 39:00 Listener Feedback: Fitting The Round Peg into the Round Hole - 40:00 Daniel Golman and Jane Austen - 43:00 Listener Feedback: Taking Action in 2023 - 45:00 *Listener Feedback: The Leadership Lessons From the Great Books - 50:00  The Three Percent Rule - 51:00 Play it as it Lays, Episode #46 - 56:00 Three Reasons We Host This Podcast - 57:30 Books Fundamentally Ground Culture - 1:00:15 Leaders Being a Jack of All Trades - 1:02:00 Generation Z's Paralysis by Over Analysis - 1:06:00 Tom Libby's Top Five Desert Island Films - 1:10:16 Stanley Kubrick, Jordan Peele, and Not Getting "It" - 1:14:00 Jesan Sorrells's Top Five Desert Island Films - 1:21:00 Cocaine Bear Film Review - 1:35:00 Staying on the Path - 1:39:00 ---Note: *(@50:00 minute mark I misspoke Mitch Joel's name and I meant Marc Maron. My apologies.)--- Pick up your copy of 12 Rules for Leaders: The Foundation of Intentional Leadership NOW on AMAZON! Check out the 2022 Leadership Lessons From the Great Books podcast reading list! --- Check out HSCT Publishing at: https://www.hsctpublishing.com/. Check out LeadingKeys at: https://www.leadingkeys.com/ Check out Leadership ToolBox at: https://leadershiptoolbox.us/ Contact HSCT for more information at 1-833-216-8296 to schedule a full DEMO of LeadingKeys with one of our team members. --- Leadership ToolBox website: https://leadershiptoolbox.us/. Leadership ToolBox LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ldrshptlbx/. Leadership ToolBox YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJvVbIU_bSEflwYpd9lWXuA/. Leadership ToolBox Twitter: https://twitter.com/ldrshptlbx. Leadership ToolBox IG: https://www.instagram.com/leadershiptoolboxus/. Leadership ToolBox FB: https://www.facebook.com/LdrshpTlbx.

As we continue our mini-series on our recently released volume The Digital Public Square with B&H Academic, I am joined by Bonnie Kristian to talk about her contribution entitled, “Should We Ban Pornography? Navigating the Complexities of Objectionable Content in a Digital Age.” Today, Bonnie and I talk about the moral plague of pornography in our society and the difficulties of banning objectionable content online.Meet Bonnie:Bonnie is a journalist and author of Untrustworthy: The Knowledge Crisis Breaking Our Brains, Polluting Our Politics, and Corrupting Christian Community (2022) and A Flexible Faith: Rethinking What it Means to Follow Jesus Today (2018). She is a columnist at Christianity Today and a fellow at Defense Priorities, a foreign policy think tank. Her work has been widely published at outlets including the New York Times, The Week, USA Today, CNN, and Politico. A graduate of Bethel Seminary, she lives in Pittsburg with her husband and twin sons.--The Digital Public Square is a production of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission and is produced and hosted by Jason Thacker. Production assistance is provided by Kadin Christian. Technical production provided by Owens Productions. It is edited and mixed by Mark Owens.

Things you'll learn in this episode of Our Prophet: -Introduction to Umm Habiba and her family - Umm Habiba faces a challenge in Habasha- Umm Habiba's marriage with Prophet- Role of Najashi in this marriage- Second version of Prophet and Umm Habiba's marriage- Abu Sufyan's visit to Umm Habiba- Reason for Prophet's marriage to Umm Habiba- Negative stances taken by Umm Habiba- What Umm Habiba did when Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr died?- When and where did Umm Habiba die?To watch on YouTube: https://youtu.be/L1h-UacGuI8Help us create the most comprehensive biography of the Prophet of Islam. Dedicate episodes in the memory of your loved ones by visiting https://thaqlain.org/ourprophet#ProphetMuhammad #PropheticBiography #OurProphetSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/our-prophet/donations

Samvad, a discussion forum, held a Twitter space to discuss the intentions of Dilli Darbar behind the nomination of Shahidi diwas of Sahibzada Baba Zorabar Singh and Baba Fateh Singh as ‘Veer Bal Diwas'. This News/Article What Is Objectionable In ‘Veer Bal Diwas', a Name Given By Dilli Darbar. appeared first on Sikh Siyasat News.

We're back for #GIVINGTUESDAY!!! We've partnered with Blue Door, our official Charity of choice, to raise money for men and women looking for clothing, food, a job, and purpose. Ceo Michael Braithwaite stops by to talk about what $25 can do for someone trying to get back on their feet again!! Elon Musk's Twitter tantrum is shaping up to be an epic fight with Apple, and Elon will LOSE. Apple has threatened to pull Twitter from the app store because Elon's Free speech is more hate speech, and Apple's Objectionable content rules are hard and fast. We break down what might happen if Tim Cook gets tired of Elon's nonstop whining and what it means for the future of Twitter and the ELON brand. Tis the season FOR DRIVE THRU FIGHTS! McDonald's and Tim Horton's have seen a HUGE uptick in Drive-Thru violence this year. Reports of violence in the fast food sector were up 200% in 2022, and Christmas is when they spike for some reason! We have two mind-blowing examples of what NOT to do if you get angry in a fast-food restaurant after a long day of shopping this holiday season! Elon Musk went anti-Semite/death con three on Apple CEO Tim Cook, and it's on! You see, Elon is pissed at Apple for giving him until Friday to adhere to Apple's universal Objectional content policy (every app in the app store has to agree to it). Elon wants to be the guy who makes the Rules, but Apple never fucks around. Google might pull Twitter from their Play store, too, but I think that;'s because Elon fucked the google founder's wife. It's the adage: "be careful who you fuck on the way up; they might fuck you on the way down." And "The Butt Doctor says human beings we not meant to use toilet paper and wants you to stop wiping your ass with it. We discuss.

Listen in podcast app* Market Update* FTX blows up* Elon is building in public* No red wave* Quick takes on Putin launching missiles at Poland* Chapelle on SNL* Recommendations and PredictionsListen on Apple, Spotify, or Google Podcasts.If you aren't in the Reformed Millennials Facebook Group join us for daily updates, discussions, and deep dives into the investable trends Millennials should be paying attention to.

I try not to lace my podcasts with profanity, but I am fired up. I almost fell for the latest psyop of the old guard Republicans in concert with the Old guard Dems and MSM. MAGA is alive and well. Trump had a great election night. Don't let them fool you. We won. But we didn't get justice. Trump had 219 wins out of 235 endorsements. That is a winning night. I would take that winning percentage to the race track anyday. Remember Democrats Ruin Everything.

Hello, this is your daily dose of news from Onmanorama. Tune in to get updated about the major news stories of the day.

There are reports out tonight that Kelvyn Alps and his partner Hannah Spierer have been arrested over alleged offences under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993. This is yet to be confirmed but there are some pretty reliable and some not so reliable...sources pointed to it being the case

The company behind a natural gas odor that was reported all across Charlotte on July 14 said it violated Mecklenburg County's 'objectionable odor rule.'In a statement, Legacy Environmental Services said it was "informed of a Notice of Objectionable Odor from Mecklenburg County Air Quality."The company said it is cooperating with the county to complete its investigation.The natural gas odor was reported in NoDa, Uptown and South End, among other parts of Charlotte. Multiple buildings in Uptown Charlotte were evacuated due to the possibility of a gas leak. Wells Fargo notified employees that they would be allowed to work from home for the remainder of the day.Charlotte city officials received so many 911 calls that an emergency alert was issued to cellphones in the area advising people to not report the smell.READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/local/company-behind-charlotte-odor-violated-meck-countys-objectionable-odor-rule-natural-gas-legacy-environmental-services-july-smell/275-f046d078-f7ca-4f67-9e6f-1ae5e7a24c85Emergency workers have recovered a person that drowned in Lake Norman.On Sunday, the Cornelius-Lemley Fire Rescue said they were searching for a drowning victim in the area of the Peninsula Yacht Club on Lake Norman.Several agencies were at the scene attempting to locate the person.Around 11 p.m., workers stated they had located the body of the deceased person.WCNC is attempting to learn more about this incident. More information will be provided when it is available.READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/local/one-person-drowns-at-lake-norman-officials-say-north-carolina-death/275-c323c760-a40c-42a0-a66a-ab57502f3c99Plus, Ben, Larry and Ruby discuss first dates and drinking. How important is drinking in your dating life? How many times have you said "Let's meet up for a drink," or have been invited for a cocktail by a potential date? Is dating and drinking a good mix? Well, post-pandemic some people being more intentional about their alcohol intake or are ditching the liquor altogether and adopting the "sober" title. And dating app Bumble is helping it's members wear it as a badge of honor. Watch Wake Up Charlotte each weekday morning from 4:30 to 7 a.m. on WCNC Charlotte, and as always, join the conversation on social media using #WakeUpCLT! 

The company behind a natural gas odor that was reported all across Charlotte on July 14 said it violated Mecklenburg County's 'objectionable odor rule.' In a statement, Legacy Environmental Services said it was "informed of a Notice of Objectionable Odor from Mecklenburg County Air Quality." The company said it is cooperating with the county to complete its investigation. The natural gas odor was reported in NoDa, Uptown and South End, among other parts of Charlotte. Multiple buildings in Uptown Charlotte were evacuated due to the possibility of a gas leak. Wells Fargo notified employees that they would be allowed to work from home for the remainder of the day. Charlotte city officials received so many 911 calls that an emergency alert was issued to cellphones in the area advising people to not report the smell. READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/local/company-behind-charlotte-odor-violated-meck-countys-objectionable-odor-rule-natural-gas-legacy-environmental-services-july-smell/275-f046d078-f7ca-4f67-9e6f-1ae5e7a24c85 Emergency workers have recovered a person that drowned in Lake Norman. On Sunday, the Cornelius-Lemley Fire Rescue said they were searching for a drowning victim in the area of the Peninsula Yacht Club on Lake Norman. Several agencies were at the scene attempting to locate the person. Around 11 p.m., workers stated they had located the body of the deceased person. WCNC is attempting to learn more about this incident. More information will be provided when it is available. READ MORE: https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/local/one-person-drowns-at-lake-norman-officials-say-north-carolina-death/275-c323c760-a40c-42a0-a66a-ab57502f3c99 Plus, Ben, Larry and Ruby discuss first dates and drinking. How important is drinking in your dating life? How many times have you said "Let's meet up for a drink," or have been invited for a cocktail by a potential date? Is dating and drinking a good mix? Well, post-pandemic some people being more intentional about their alcohol intake or are ditching the liquor altogether and adopting the "sober" title. And dating app Bumble is helping it's members wear it as a badge of honor. Watch Wake Up Charlotte each weekday morning from 4:30 to 7 a.m. on WCNC Charlotte, and as always, join the conversation on social media using #WakeUpCLT! 

Working together for over 40 years, Burns and Allen was an American comedy duo consisting of George Burns and his wife, Gracie Allen. Burns played the straight man to Allen's sillier role. Their 30-minute radio show debuted in September 1934, moving back and forth between NBC and CBS, until May 1950. GSMC Classics presents some of the greatest classic radio broadcasts, classic novels, dramas, comedies, mysteries, and theatrical presentations from a bygone era. The GSMC Classics collection is the embodiment of the best of the golden age of radio. Let Golden State Media Concepts take you on a ride through the classic age of radio, with this compiled collection of episodes from a wide variety of old programs. ***PLEASE NOTE*** GSMC Podcast Network presents these shows as historical content and have brought them to you unedited. Remember that times have changed and some shows might not reflect the standards of today's politically correct society. The shows do not necessarily reflect the views, standards, or beliefs of Golden State Media Concepts or the GSMC Podcast Network. Our goal is to entertain, educate, and give you a glimpse into the past.

A PREVIEW of what's to come... Is profanity, objectionable subject matter present in music, just novelty, or a necessity with artistic liberty taken under free speech and expression? We know that such extreme measures at curtailing music, targeting certain groups and recording artists have been happening over time for generations. In more recent years, "Rap" music has been used in criminal prosecution in a number of cases, yet music has been cited as not being of a sizable influence to everyday, normally stable people in society. As the old saying goes, "All money ain't good money", my personal belief is that it goes for music and for almost anything that can be propagandized and marketed, having potential influence or persuasiveness over the masses. It becomes a matter of having the constitutional right to free speech and of a legally consenting consumer's right to choose. I wonder that of those in the position of a music creator, it's ultimately a matter of free expression and as a creative, what are the considerations, if any when it comes to the music one chooses to make? Is there pressure to be more daring or more obscene than not? Is there persuasiveness for an artist to be something they're not? Is there a moral compass? Was there ever one? For fans, and audiences, it's about authenticity perhaps compromising what's most appropriate for something offering true contextual perspective. No judgment here. Judgment FREE zone. You be the judge. In another upcoming 'ep that's a bit more babble than boogie. This is a page from the "Black Music Month's" scrapbook that we won't skim over to the next because we fear what's pictured on its page. A fan first and a non-judgmental, perspective, and speculative assessment at most is on the MBTM - Radiovision Podcast Channel. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/must-be-the-music/message

Rev. Erik KhoobyarianReading:  Luke 5:1-11Peter's first interaction with Jesus in Luke's gospel comes when Peter's had a long night of empty nets. Jesus looks him in the eyes and invites him to fish again. Where is Jesus inviting you to go?Support the show (https://presbyws.org/donate/)

Join Paul Abernathy as he tackles another question submitted via PaulAbernathy.com. Today's question is about acceptable levels of objectionable current on the supply-side of the service disconnection means and what should or should not be done about it.

Join Paul Abernathy on this episode of Ask Paul where he tackles a long question about supply-side bonding and the potential for objectionable currents. Should be a great episode.

Join Paul Abernathy on this episode of Ask Paul where he tackles a long question about supply-side bonding and the potential for objectionable currents. Should be a great episode.

Psychiatrists are not strangers to difficult and even potentially dangerous patients, but James L. Knoll IV, MD, has made these populations one of his specialties. With decades of experience in forensic psychiatry, Knoll takes listeners deep into the US criminal justice system, where he treats both inmates suffering from detention-related psychiatric disorders and an especially challenging group that he has dubbed morally objectionable patients.  In this conversation, Psychiatric Times and Knoll cover: 1.     What he means by the term morally objectionable patients.  2.     How prisons' strict social hierarchies can contribute to psychiatric illnesses.  3.     The high prevalence of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in corrections—and their potential causes.  4.     The different challenges of treating patients in prisons vs jails.  5.     Why inmates with psychiatric illnesses end up in the correctional system for longer than those without psychiatric illnesses. 6.     The role of mental health courts in improving psychiatric care in the correctional system. 7.     The challenges of treating patients who are high in psychopathy or have anti-social personality disorders.   This is the first half of the Psych Pearls podcast with Dr Knoll. Stay tuned for the second half later in the week.  Dr Knoll is professor of psychiatry and director of forensic psychiatry at SUNY Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, New York, and clinical director of Central New York Psychiatric Center in Marcy, New York. He is Emeritus Editor-in-Chief of the Psychiatric Times and President-elect of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (2022-23).

The Nintendo Entertainment Podcast is here, and this time, a huge focus will be on the newest Pokemon Presents event! And indeed the guys are diving right into the Pokemon news, and there's a lot of it! They talk about the titles like Pokemon Go, Pokemon Unite, and Cafe Remix! Then, they dive into Brilliant Diamond and Shining Pearl and discuss the changes made and how it'll do sales-wise. Finally, they dive into Pokemon Legends Arceus and talk about how this title is a MUCH different take on the Pokemon world! Then, the guys go into the news and discuss the NPD data, the arrival of the Doom Collection, No More Heroes 3 teases, and more! Finally, in the main event, the guys talk the potential of Xenoblade Chronicles 3! Will it be a true sequel? SHOULD it be a true sequel? And what else do the guys want, and don't want, from it?  So sit back, relax, and enjoy the Nintendo Entertainment Podcast!

250.6 Grounding, Objectionable Current – https://www.MikeHolt.com/bonding. What is “objectionable current”? What are it's causes, can it be prevented and if so, how? In this podcast, we discuss why objectionable current is a dangerous condition and the NEC requirements that serve to mitigate its causes.

YouTube has made a lot of changes in the past year to limit the problematic videos it recommends to viewers. But a new study suggests the company's efforts have a way to go. Reporter Tripp Mickle joins host Zoe Thomas to discuss the challenges YouTube and other social platforms face in weeding out harmful content without censoring diverse points of view. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

There are probably few things more irritating, when examining a deponent, than having the defending lawyers repeatedly interrupt and claim they don't understand your questions. It's bad enough when witnesses feign ignorance of the obvious. But the opposing lawyers, too? In this episode, Jim Garrity tackles the subject of lawyers who engage in obstruction-by-colloquy, and how to deal with it. Helpful case citations in the show notes, below. Thanks for listening.SHOW NOTESMusto, et al. v. Transport Workers Union of America, AFL – CIO, et al., 2009 WL 116960 (E. D. New York January 16, 2009) (attorney may not “interpret” questions for deponent, or engage in lengthy speaking objections and colloquy; “the witness comes to the deposition to testify, not to indulge in a parody of Charlie McCarthy, with lawyers coaching or bending the witness's words to mold a legally convenient record”)Security National Bank of Sioux City Iowa v. Abbott Laboratories, 299 F.R.D. 595 (N. D. Iowa July 28, 2014 (“Lawyers may not object simply because they find a question to be vague, nor may they assume that the witness will not understand the question. The witness—not the lawyer—gets to decide whether he or she understands a particular question”; “[w]hile it is impossible to know for certain what a witness would have said absent Counsel's objections, I find it inconceivable that the witnesses deposed in this case would so regularly request clarification were they not tipped-off by Counsel's objections”)Chesbrough et al. v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 31 Mass.L.Rptr. 629 (Sup. Ct. Mass Feb. 14, 2014) (“If the deponent does not understand the question, or the meaning of a word or phrase, or even if the deponent has a question about a document, he or she should ask the questioning attorney”)Applied Telematics, Inc. v. Sprint Corporation, 1995 WL 79237, Civ. A. No. 94–CV–4603 (E.D. Penn. Feb. 22, 1995) (“In addition, plaintiff's attorney may not object to a question that the attorney does not understand. As stated in Hall, “a lawyer's purported lack of understanding is not a proper reason to interrupt a deposition.” Nor may the lawyer state for the record what his understanding of the question is. Id. These types of responses by an attorney are irrelevant and suggestive of a particularly desired answer. Id. If the witness does not understand the question, or needs some language further defined or some documents further explained, the witness can ask the deposing lawyer to clarify or further explain the question”)Peronis v. United States, 2017 WL 696132, Case No. 2:16-cv-01389-NBF (W.D. Penn. Feb. 17, 2017) “ ‘A deposition is meant to be a question-and-answer conversation between the deposing lawyer and the witness.' ” Johnson v. Wayne Manor Apartments, 152 F.R.D. 56, 59 (E.D. Pa. 1993) (quoting Hall v. Clifton Precision, 150 F.R.D. 525, 528 (E.D. Pa. 1993)). “ ‘There is no proper need for the witness's own lawyer to act as an intermediary, interpreting questions, deciding which questions the witness should answer, and helping the witness to formulate answers")Community Association Underwriters of America, Inc. v. Queensboro Flooring Corp., 2014 WL 3055358, Civil Action No. 3:10–CV–1559. (M. D. Penn. July 3, 2014) (Under the federal rules, an attorney is not permitted to object to form and demand clarification of a question the attorney claims not to understand; the witness should be permitted to answer the question posed, or to ask for clarification herself if she does not understand the question. See Birdine v. City of Coatesville, 225 F.R.D. 157, 159 (E.D.Pa.2004); Hall, 150 F.R.D. at 530 n. 10. Moreover, “lawyers are strictly prohibited from making any comments ...which might suggest or limit a witness's answer to an unobjectionable question.” Hall, 150 F.R.D. at 531; see also Deville v. Givaudan Fragrances Corp., 419 Fed. App'x 201, 209 (3d Cir.2011) (affirming Rule 30(d)(2) sanctions imposed when attorney “testified on behalf of her witness by way of suggestive speaking objections”); Birdine, 225 F.R.D. at 159 (objection that deponent “already testified that within five feet was the closest he got” was improperly suggestive). Likewise, “counsel are not permitted to state on the record their interpretations of questions, since those interpretations are irrelevant and often suggestive of a particularly desired answer")

Today we introduce a new category of episode, based on your fantastic feedback about things you'd like to get out of the podcast. Episodes in this category will be called Objectionable Objections, and each will focus on a single type of improper objection commonly made by lawyers in depositions.Today's episode zeroes in on "If you know" speaking objections and its poisonous cousins, "If you remember," "If you understand the question," "Don't assume," "Don't speculate," and so on. They'll wreck your depositions if you don't put an immediate stop to them.Thanks for listening! And please don't forget to return the favor by leaving us a five-star rating wherever you get your podcast. That's how you can show us the love for this completely free, invaluable podcast series.SHOW NOTESIn re Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation, 2020 WL 6687777, Case No. 20 – MD – 2924 (S. D. Fla. November 11, 2020) (Pretrial Order setting Deposition Protocol for Defendant's Witnesses and Third Parties, and specifically ordering counsel to refrain from “all comments that could be perceived as instructive to a witness, such as “you can answer if you understand the question” or “you can answer if you know”)Latele Television, C.A. v. Telemundo Communications Group, LLC et al., 2014 WL 5816585, Case No. 12 – 2 539 – CIV (S. D. Florida, November 10, 2014) (“To avoid any ambiguity, the Undersigned considers an “if you know” comment to a deponent before he or she answers a deposition question to usually be improper coaching, designed to signal the witness to answer that he or she does not know or remember the answer”)Mills et al. v. General Motors LLC, 2017 WL 4279651 Case No. 2:17-201-RMG (D. S. C. September 22, 2017) (court authorizes redeposition of corporate representative, for two additional days, due to counsel's alleged failure to comply with the rules governing deposition conduct; “Defendant's counsel made over one hundred speaking objections. Many were leading. For example, Defendant's counsel repeatedly objected that a question was beyond the scope of the notice and then instructed the witness to answer “if you know”—clearly inviting the witness to answer “I don't know.” (E.g., id. at 10 (three times).)Natural-Immunogenics Corp. v. Newport Trial Group , et al. 2017 WL 10562691, case number SACV 15 – 02034 (C. D. California August 7, 2017) (finding that Special Master properly awarded sanctions against lawyer who lodged numerous argumentative and suggestive objections that coached witnesss or rephrased the questions, including “if you know” objections)AKH Company, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company , Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Sanctions 2016 WL 141629, Case No. 13-2003-JAR-KGG (D. Kansas January 12, 2016) (“Outright coaching occurred (e.g., “It's a ‘yes' or ‘no'.” “Do you know that or are you assuming?” “Are you making an assumption now or are you assuming?” “If you're not sure or you don't know, just say so.” “That's a new question.” Answer “if you know”).Lund v. Matthews, et al. 2014 WL 517569, No. 8:13CV144, Order Granting Defendants Motion for Sanctions (D. Nebraska Feb. 7, 2014) (sanctions awarded against plaintiff, and redeposition allowed, based in part on improper objections; held, “It is unnecessary to add “to the best of your ability,” “if you know,” or any other commentary after an objection. From review of the deposition transcript, Lund apparently had no difficulties understanding or communicating in English and was capable of seeking clarification or stating he did not know an answer”)Hunter v.. GEICO General Insurance Company, 2018 WL 4352823, Case No. 17-05070 (B. D. Louisiana Sep. 12, 2018) “An objection that a question is ‘vague' is usually, and in this instance was, a speaking objection disguised as a form objection. It essentially expresses a concern that the witness may not understand the question. Only the witness knows whether [he] understands a question, and the witness has a duty to request clarification if needed”)Mazzeo v. Gibbons, et al., Order Granting Emergency Motion to Forbid Attorney Walter Cannon from Making Improper Objections at Depositions and for Sanctions , 2010 WL 3020021, No. 2:08–cv–01387–RLH–PAL (D. Nevada July 27, 2010) (“If I was an elementary school teacher instead of a judge I would require both counsel to write the following clearly established legal rules on a blackboard 500 times: I will not make speaking, coaching, suggestive objections which violate Rule 30(c)(2). I am an experienced lawyer and know that objections must be concise, nonargumentative and non-suggestive. I understand that the purpose of a deposition is to find out what the witness thinks, saw, heard or did. I know that lawyers are not supposed to coach or change the witness's own words to form a legally convenient record. I know I am prohibited from frustrating or impeding the fair examination of a deponent during the deposition. I know that constant objections and unnecessary remarks are unwarranted and frustrate opposing counsel's right to fair examination. I know that speaking objections such as “if you remember,” “if you know,” “don't guess,” “you've answered the question,” and “do you understand the question” are designed to coach the witness and are improper. I also know that counsel's interjection that he or she does not understand the question is not a proper objection, and that if a witness needs clarification of a question, the witness may ask for the clarification”)Continental Casualty Company v. Compass Bank, 2005 WL 8158672, CA 04-0766-CB-C (S.D. Ala. Aug. 8, 2005) (order granting motion for sanctions with regard to conduct of plaintiff's counsel at depositions, including “Don't speculate,” “Don't guess”, and numerous other speaking objections)Martin A. McDonough v. Kenniston, et al., 188 F.R.D. 22 (D. N. Hampshire Nov. 3, 1998) (“Prior to the 1993 Amendments to Rule 30(d), the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure did not contain specific limitations on the conduct of lawyers during depositions. In his concurrence with the Supreme Court's opinion in Herbert v. Lando, a case involving a 26 volume, 3,000 page deposition taken intermittently over a year, Justice Powell noted that “discovery techniques and tactics have become a highly developed litigation art—one not infrequently exploited to the disadvantage of justice.” 441 U.S. 153, 179, 99 S. Ct. 1635, 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979). By the early 90's reports in the Second and Seventh Circuit flatly stated that methods of taking and defending depositions were “exercises in competitive obstructionism”1 and “abusive and unethical.”2 Improper directions not to answer, suggestive or coaching objections, and “conferences” with the deponent were the primary evils addressed. Multiple and/or unnecessary objections, statements such as “if you know,” “if you remember,” “if you understand”, etc., prolonged deposition and abusive and harassing deposition questioning were among the other deposition tactics in use”)Security National Bank of Sioux City Iowa, etc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 299 F. R. D. 595 (N. D. Iowa July 28, 2014) (“When a lawyer tells a witness to answer “if you know,” it not-so-subtly suggests that the witness may not know the answer, inviting the witness to dodge or qualify an otherwise clear question. For this reason, “[i]nstructions to a witness that they may answer a question ‘if they know' or ‘if they understand the question' are raw, unmitigated coaching, and are never appropriate”)In re Neurontin Antitrust Litigation, 2011 WL 253434, Master Civil Action No. 02–1390(FSH) (D. N. J. Jan. 25, 2011) (describing improper objections, including “speaking objections such as “if you remember,” “if you know,” “don't guess,” “you've answered the question,” and “do you understand the question”)In re Fetzima, 2020 WL 6268684, Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-10230 (ES)(SCM) (D. N. J. Oct. 23, 2020) (noting that because “Depositions are the factual battleground where the vast majority of litigation actually takes place,” Court would direct counsel to refrain from objections such as “if you know,” “if you remember,” “don't guess,” and similar coaching in speaking objections)

with Dhanya, Kishori Jani, and Bhakti Lata

Craiglist, c'est un peu Le Bon Coin version américaine. Et bien sûr il n'est pas question d'y poster n'importe quoi. 100% anglais La série Avec J'Améliore mon Anglais, prenez quelques minutes pour écouter un article de WikiNews accompagné de quelques mots de vocabulaire. Je termine le podcast en vous posant une question en anglais qui fait suite à l'histoire. Pour accéder à tous les épisodes, c'est par ici. Écouter le podcast Prêtez attention au vocabulaire et essayez d'anticiper l'histoire grâce au titre et au vocabulaire, ça vous aidera à comprendre le texte. Pour écouter le podcast, plusieurs options selon vos préférences. Vous aurez reconnu tout au début de cet article le lecteur du podcast en mp3 (audio). Vous êtes libre de l'écouter directement sur cette page-ci. Cliquez sur le bouton Play à gauche de la barre noire. Le télécharger pour l'écouter plus tard, ou l'écouter plusieurs fois. Cliquez sur Download sous la barre noire. Le vocabulaire de cet article Pour progresser en anglais si votre niveau le permet, écoutez le podcast, écrivez les mots et expressions que j'explique, puis vérifiez leur orthographe. Voici la liste des mots et expressions dont je vous parle dans le podcast. Si vous avez une mémoire visuelle, vous voudrez peut-être les lire avant d'écouter le podcast (ou pendant). An ad (an advert/ advertisement): a short text or image to try to sell something To sue: take legal action To host: to offer space on a website or server Housing ads: adverts for houses A lawyer: person who helps people with law and justice questions Fair housing: making houses available to everyone, without discrimination Objectionable: wrong A requirement: something you must have, or you must do A godly christian male: A man who believes in Christ and obeys God A muslim: A person who follows the religion of Islam CEO (Chief Executive Officer): Head of a company To concede: to admit, accept To screen: to analyse A flagging system: A system to highlight something important or incorrect L'article WikiNews Bien sûr, rien de tel que de lire l'article en complément de l'écoute. Ainsi vous aurez la possibilité de vous pencher un peu plus sur la structure des phrases. Mais je vous recommande de pratiquer l'écoute un maximum, voire de rejouer le podcast plusieurs fois avant de lire l'article. Vous trouverez l'article ici. De quoi ça parle? (Spoiler alert!!) Selon votre niveau en anglais, vous aurez saisi plus ou moins de détails. Le plus important est de comprendre le sens de l'histoire. Et très souvent, après avoir compris le sens global, une deuxième écoute vous permettra de noter plus de détails. Résumé: Craiglist se retrouve en justice avec une demande de mieux contrôler les contenus postés sur le site. Eviter la discrimination, voilà l'objet de cette demande. Mais le PDG a déjà mis un système en place, qui lui semble très efficace. Ma question: What do you think of the decision to sue Craiglist website?   Avez-vous compris l'histoire sans vous aider du résumé? Avez-vous su répondre à ma question?     L'article J'Améliore Mon Anglais – Episode 180 est apparu en premier sur Langonaute.

This week, the hosts of one of Blaze Radio's best shows dive right into delivering news and their thoughts on the signing of the For The People Act (Vaughan). We also go over a morbid milestone and an update on how expensive Texas freezing over has already gotten for its residents with Gideon. We wrap up the news with some talk about the good work Bico, a narcotics detection dog, did earlier this month in Cincinati (Kirsten). Vaughan kicks off entertainment by filling us in on Bobby Shmurda's release from prison and what led up to it. This part of the show ends with news of the end of an era (listen to find out which one). As always, Nicole and Vaughan take the lead on sports. Find out all about how the NFL apparently trades with packs of gum and popsicle sticks, what was said in a leaked video of the Mariners' president, Kevin Mather, and which ASU sports are cursed. This jam-packed segment also includes good news about the Suns -- some of it even related to one of our hosts! We finish the episode discussing the excellence Naomi Osaka and Novak Djokovic have been serving up in pro tennis. Don't forget to follow us on Twitter @hypoth_speaking. You can also find us on Anchor, or wherever you get podcasts! This episode was recorded on February 22, 2021.

The government is considering making it a criminal offence to livestream objectionable content as part of a wider government programme to address violent extremism. Gaps in New Zealand's laws to tackle concerning online activity were highlighted in the wake of the Christchurch Mosque terrorist attacks on March 15. Anjum Rahman is spokesperson for the Islamic Women's Council New Zealand.

"I'm Sorry I'll Read That Again - S04E10 - Ghost Of Objectionable Manor" from archive.org was assembled into the "Dimsdale" podcast by Fourble. Episode 1040 of 1095.

Topics: The Tunnel, William Gass, Ted Morrissey, Robert Musil, Difficult Books, Literature, Marginality, Lying (in the tunnel), Antisemitism, Provocation, Surface, Substance, Juxtaposition, Objectionable, History, GW Bush, Pynchon, Digital Papertrail, Micros...

Topics: The Tunnel, William Gass, Ted Morrissey, Robert Musil, Difficult Books, Literature, Marginality, Lying (in the tunnel), Antisemitism, Provocation, Surface, Substance, Juxtaposition, Objectionable, History, GW Bush, Pynchon, Digital Papertrail, Micros...

Covid-19 on a license plate ...seriously? "Google Me" on a Toyota. "Want to meet the most amazing person in the world? Look in the mirra ..." Oof

Covid-19 on a license plate ...seriously? "Google Me" on a Toyota. "Want to meet the most amazing person in the world? Look in the mirra ..." Oof

Section 230 is a vitally important law for online community builders in the U.S. That’s why we’ve consistently talked about it on Community Signal, and the growing threat to its existence. The volume of legislation being proposed, that would amend Section 230, is increasingly rapidly with 6 bills proposed in September and October alone. These bills will impact online communities small and large – not just Big Tech. Whenever new Section 230 altering legislation is proposed, Jess Miers analyzes it. Jess works as a legal policy specialist at Google, while finishing up a law degree, and she joins the show to talk about what’s on the horizon. Jess and Patrick discuss: Why are legislators so focused on Section 230 right now? Trends from the bills that are on the table Regulators efforts to stop communities from moderating things that aren’t illegal Our Podcast is Made Possible By… If you enjoy our show, please know that it’s only possible with the generous support of our sponsors: Vanilla, a one-stop shop for online community and Localist, plan, promote, and measure events for your community. Big Quotes Why are there so many Section 230 bills right now? (4:15): “If I have to be really cynical about this, we’re in an election cycle. Doing something about Section 230 looks good for regulators that are trying to get reelected. It seems like everybody has fallen out of love with the internet, both on the regulatory and user side. Section 230 is just one of those things that’s easy to come up with a proposal for and generate a lot of excitement around.” –@jess_miers More honestly from Big Tech could lead to more understanding from legislators (22:09): “If Big Tech was a little bit more forthcoming about [the moderation] challenges they face, maybe we wouldn’t have such a blind spot in the regulatory process when they’re coming up with content moderation restrictive bills.” –@jess_miers What communities and dance floors have in common (22:27): “There is an issue [when] a company has problems around content moderation and they talk about how they’ve reached a certain limit or they couldn’t hire anyone else and yet, they report record revenue. That’s a problem because sometimes you’re placing artificial restrictions on yourself with staffing because you made this much money and you decided you didn’t want to spend it.” –@patrickokeefe Should Section 230 be amended? (34:10): “Amending Section 230 isn’t going to fix any of the issues that we have with the internet. It’s just going to make it harder for us to fix those issues in the long run.” –@jess_miers About Jess Miers Jess Miers is a third-year law student at Santa Clara University School of Law, where she studies internet law and policy. During law school, Jess was a legal intern for Twitter and TechFreedom, a technology policy think-tank based in Washington, D.C. Currently, Jess is a research associate for the UCLA Institute for Technology, Law, and Policy, where she speaks and writes about intermediary liability law. Her scholarship primarily covers Section 230 and content moderation. As of recent, Jess is also a full-time policy specialist at Google. Related Links Sponsor: Localist, plan, promote, and measure events for your community Sponsor: Vanilla, a one-stop-shop for online community Anette Beebe on Community Signal’s episode about Trump’s Executive Order Jess Miers’ website Google, where Jess is a legal policy specialist UCLA Institute for Technology, Law and Policy, where Jess is a research associate Text of Don’t Push My Buttons Act (see Jess’ redline documenting proposed Section 230 changes) Text of House version of EARN It Act (Jess’ redline) Text of See Something, Say Something Act (Jess’ redline) Text of Protect Speech Act (Jess’ redline) Text of Online Content Policy Modernization Act (Jess’ redline) Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA)/Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) Text of Section 230 Zeran v. America Online Inc. Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC Text of Stopping Big Tech’s Censorship Act (Jess’ redline) Text of Platform Accountability and Consumer Transparency (PACT) Act (Jess’ redline) Facebook will pay $52 million in settlement with moderators who developed PTSD on job, about Serena Scola, at al. v. Facebook, Inc. case (via The Verge) Fair Labor Standards Act Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) Jess Miers’ Medium blog Jess Miers’ Section 230 talk at TEDxSantaClaraUniversity Transcript View transcript on our website Your Thoughts If you have any thoughts on this episode that you’d like to share, please leave me a comment, send me an email or a tweet. If you enjoy the show, we would be so grateful if you spread the word and supported Community Signal on Patreon.

There comes a time on every podcast where one topic gets more coverage than you might think necessary. This is that episode. Follow Us:   https://youtube.com/channel/UC4N-yAUYC24tcA8UqbimpZw   https://instagram.com/theknucklesandwichpodcast/   https://facebook.com/theknucklesandwichpodcast/ 

Found a new intro song. Twilight didn't age well, did it? The first NEW movie to hit theaters has NEW in the name, and a lot of drama attached to it. And actors I adore! Quickies on COVID. We love Pink and her candor. She wants her kids to know when she's angry. A new Girl Scout Cookies flavor. An update on Floyd's health. A great community resource is set to reopen this month. I had an unfortunate, absent minded gaffe when we interviewed them.  Where are all these sunflower fields!? BIG DISCUSSION on what you do when someone you're really really REALLY close to do has some objectionable values, words and beliefs.   

Offensive tweets, lockdown frustration and coronaspiracies galore, with Niles Nyquist, Shane [REDACTED], Simon Haight and The Pikelet Man on the line from their respective bunkers.

Internet NZ’s chief executive, Jordan Carter joined Laura Kvigstad to discuss the recent bill from the government to create a legal framework to censor objectionable material online. Carter explains the good and the bad in the bill from his perspective. 

Internet NZ’s chief executive, Jordan Carter joined Laura Kvigstad to discuss the recent bill from the government to create a legal framework to censor objectionable material online. Carter explains the good and the bad in the bill from his perspective. 

We watched How to Train Your Dragon: Hidden World a year late, and, fittingly, it takes us most of this episode of meandering around, berating famous men, to even get around to talking about it. Also, the introduction of our Weekly Recommendations—this week, we're each bringing a TV Show we're watching in this, our plague year. Featuring: Psychic Vampires in Quarantine, Will Otis Please Stand Up, Home Improvement is Objectionable, Meandering SNL Chat, Actors Who Just Look Like A Friend's Dad I'm Avoiding, Nitpicking Famous Men Part 139221027, A Shiny Smooth Horny Dragon, and A Show From Each Streaming Service. Daniel Lavery on Nathan For You: https://www.shatnerchatner.com/p/episodes-of-nathan-for-you-designed

Sometimes I look at a board game and think, "That ain't right, man."Today we look at controversial and objectionable themes in board games -- who gets to decide what's right and what's wrong to include. Hint: it's not Shut Up and Sit Down's responsibility, who we take a few shots at. We explore how a controversial or objectionable theme affects the perception of a game's merit. We also review Glen More II, a game about producing the most whiskey and sheep in Scotland. Wait, didn't we do this one already? Nope! This one has tile placement, too!02:46 On Tour03:09 Ghandi03:31 Isle of Cats03:36 Everdell07:01 Root07:09 Maracaibo08:14 Eclipse08:17 Gloomhaven08:39 It's a Wonderful World09:29 Underwater Cities: New Discoveries10:41 FEATURE REVIEW Glen More II27:35 Barrage & Maracaibo28:27 FEATURE TOPIC Controversy and Objectionable Themes28:41 Secret Hitler29:56 Clans of Caledonia30:20 New Bedford34:48 Maracaibo36:43 Five Tribes37:00 Endeavor: Age of Sail39:51 4X, Eclipse, 18xx, Brass, John Company41:51 Spirit Island42:36 COIN Games and Soul of the Empire44:03 Rising Sun, Blood Rage, and Ankh44:48 Don't Drop the Soap

The boys are joined by a very special guest all the way from Tokyo. But before that, Davis and Donnovan debate the recently released Top 30 Free Agent list on CFL.ca. Later, in this week's Objectionable Conduct, Davis weighs in on people "doing it for the 'gram" in public. 0:00 Welcome to the Waggle 2:34 Passing of Kobe Bryant 9:06 Zach Collaros signs in Winnipeg 11:20 Donnovan's Top 5 Free Agents 19:10 Davis' Top 5 Free Agents 21:40 Toronto and Ottawa's options at QB 28:48 Should Nichols feel slighted by the Bombers? 37:37 Objectionable conduct: Influencers in the wild 43:29 Interview with Scotty from Tokyo's CFL podcast “Two Guys, One Grey Cup”

Brodie is back from her honeymoon and joins Donnovan to chat about the latest on CFL 2.0, the top 30 free agents about to hit the market, and the appropriateness of sweatpants in the office. 0:00 How late is too late to say “Happy New Year”? 2:00 Brodie's wedding and honeymoon in Australia/New Zealand 6:30 Global combines continue, Brazil joins CFL 2.0 movement 9:15 Donnovan discusses his optimism about 2.0 after the success of Thiadric Hansen 16:45 Free agency approaching, top 30 free agent list dropping this week, Brodie and Donnovan's top free agents 31:45 CFL Power Couples 40:35 Montreal front office assembles 43:20 Who will Meghan and Harry cheer for? 45:50 Objectionable conduct: When are sweatpants appropriate?

Listen as Paul Abernathy discusses the basics of Objectionable Current and the basic fundamental causes of those currents.

Listen as Paul Abernathy discusses the basics of Objectionable Current and the basic fundamental causes of those currents.

In this episode, I rant about J.D. Greear's silly point about the scandal of gospel inclusivity, Ayn Rand's Objectable Objectivism, and Al Mohler's criticism of the political party that many under his employment actually support.

He was an avid reader, a choral singer. He was someone's son, brother, and friend. Oh, and he was also...a mass murderer. Take a listen as the team discusses a viral news story about the Dayton mass shooter. Buckle up as emotions run high. 

ATW Marino blog podcast

The past is a nightmare, but we can’t erase it. It’s important to preserve historical documents, to make them available, and to let them teach us the terrible lessons of history. But, as a bookseller, what do you do when the contents of these documents are truly vile? Is it ethical to make a profit by selling a photograph of the victims of Nazi concentration camps, or to keep a book on bomb making in circulation? And should you eschew the controversial novels of today, when they tend to become the classics of tomorrow? Join us for an exploration of these thorny issues on this week’s #brattlecast.

We’re back with another dose of Switch news, game impressions and discussion! This week, the team chat about the prospect of Disney+, Darksiders, Dead Cells and Phoenix Wright’s first outing on Switch. Join us as we discuss: Disney+ coming to Switch? Darksiders: Warmastered Edition Final Fantasy VII Dead Cells My Time at Portia Phoenix Wright: […] The post Switch Focus #69 – Objectionable? appeared first on GAMEPODULAR.

We're back with another dose of Switch news, game impressions and discussion! This week, the team chat about the prospect of Disney+, Darksiders, Dead Cells and Phoenix Wright's first outing on Switch. Join us as we discuss: Disney+ coming to Switch? Darksiders: Warmastered Edition Final Fantasy VII Dead Cells My Time at Portia Phoenix Wright: […] The post Switch Focus #69 – Objectionable? appeared first on GAMEPODULAR.

In today’s podcast, we hear that Kiev says it’s found complex, large-scale Russian influence operations in Ukraine’s presidential election. Australian investigators are said to be closer to concluding that recent hacking attempts were the work of Chinese intelligence services. There’s also plenty of ordinary crime to go around. Huawei continues its charm and affordability offensive. User comments drive advertisers away from YouTube. DrainerBot sucks power from phones. And Russia outlaws soldier-selfies. Ben Yelin from UMD CHHS about a lawsuit involving a man refusing to unlock his phone at the U.S. border. Guest is Linda Burger from NSA with information on their Technology Transfer Program.  For links to all of today's stories check our our CyberWire daily news brief: https://thecyberwire.com/issues/issues2019/February/CyberWire_2019_02_22.html  Support our show

Today we sit at our desks, hugging our briefcases, after calling our best friend and calling them a "witch", looking back on all that we have endured together over these last 23 episodes. This first chapter of Ally McBeal gave us some truly exquisite highs and some absolutely ATROCIOUS lows, and we're discussing all our favourite moments and all our most OBJECTIONable ones. This is our Season 1 Wrap Up! *** Find Bygones: On TWITTER! @bygonespodcast On FACEBOOK! Search Bygones Podcast On INSTA! @bygonespod  On EMAIL! bygonespodcast@gmail.com ***

Some contemporary artists take moral risks in order to confront an audience with what they think is the truth. Some even use other people as part of their works. We discuss artworks from the third chapter of Ways of Looking:  Thomas Hirschhorn’s Touching Reality (2013) and Santiago Sierra’s 160 cm Line Tattooed on 4 People (2000). Note […]

Your mom's favorite podcast is back and this week we're at the newly-opened Swensons Drive-In that just opened on Nov. 9th to try some hamburgs and the world famous Galley Boy. Plus we have a special segment that you'll have to stay til the end to experience. Get ready for some Ronald McDonald fan-fiction. (read the whole thing here) Start your free trial on Audible today, click the link to start your free trial!: http://www.audibletrial.com/tasteful Be sure to subscribe and check us out on social media @tastebudscbus

MotA-Minute: Beneath The Minute of the Apes - Minute 61"Minute of the Apes" is the daily podcast where Sean, Richard and Todd break down "The Planet of the Apes" movies, one minute at a time.Follow us on:Facebook @MinuteOfTheApesTwitter @MinuteOfTheApesEmail: podcast@minuteoftheapes.comWebsite: https://www.minuteoftheapes.com/

MotA-Minute: Beneath The Minute of the Apes - Minute 61"Minute of the Apes" is the daily podcast where Sean, Richard and Todd break down "The Planet of the Apes" movies, one minute at a time.Follow us on:Facebook @MinuteOfTheApesTwitter @MinuteOfTheApesEmail: podcast@minuteoftheapes.comWebsite: https://www.minuteoftheapes.com/

Bible study of the book of Jonah.

Increasingly, platforms have been under pressure on a number of fronts to take down, moderate and/or stop hosting objectionable groups and content, such as content originating from white supremacists, alleged sex traffickers, terrorist groups and the like. The pressure is coming from political forces seeking legal reforms, such as the recently passed Section 230 exception […]

Nearly ever genre of entertainment is filled with wickedness. However, the worst content imaginable often slips right past us. Join AMBrewster as he teaches Christian parents how to spot the most destructive element in their family’s entertainment.   Check out 5 Ways to Support TLP. Click here for Today’s Episode Notes and Transcript.   Like us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter. Follow AMBrewster on Twitter. Follow us on Pinterest. Subscribe on YouTube.   Need some help? Write to us at Counselor@TruthLoveParent.com.

Have you ever purchased a product that others hated? Or what about the opposite .. .have you ever seen others using a product or service that you absolutely despised? The flipside to any positive emotional connection is a negative one. If you are producing a product or service that is inspiring enough that some people love what you are doing --- odds are there are others will actually dislike your product with an equal passion.

In today's episode of The Art of Passive Income—Round Table edition, Mark is joined by: Tate Litchfield Erik Peterson Mike Zaino Cynthia Tripathi TODAY'S TOPICS We dive deep into a case of what would you do? You sold a property for $50,000 on terms to a objectionable couple who are continuously late on payments but always make it up in the end. They moved the entire family onto the property, plus friends… one of which causes havoc and steals from the neighbors. Then you discover that the guy who bought the property is a felon who just got re-arrested for being in possession of firearms. To sum it up—you have criminals living on a property that is still in your name and an upset community but you're getting paid every month with late fees, on a sizable note… is it worth the headache? COULD you do anything if they are not breaking their contract? And finally, what can you do to protect yourself from situations like this in the future? Our last topic: Get to know Cynthia Tripathi! Cynthia, a Land Geek Student, came to the program a bit skeptical. She bought the toolkit, sold her 1st property to a neighbor making more money on that sale than an entire month at a job she hated. So she decided to quit her job and go all in! Listen in as she shares her journey—the good and the bad, and how she feels about the program now. TIP OF THE WEEK Mark: Check out the app, AppUnsubscri.be to easily unsubscribe from in-app subscriptions for your iPhone. Mike: The only Zen you can find on the tops of mountains is the Zen you bring up there—The only success you find, is the success you bring. Tate: Check out SimilarWeb.com for free reports on any website. Erik: Check out the app, GetStation.com to manage all of your apps in one place. Cynthia:  Read the book, Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World by Cal Newport. It talks about shaping your perspective in a different way about working. Isn't it time to create passive income so you can work where you want, when you want and with whomever you want?

Dr. James Anderson preaches from 1 Corinthians 1 on four objectionable words.

What do you do when a roommate is making others uncomfortable? That is what’s going on at 75 West 238th Street in the Bronx, and Kennita Anderson, the property manager from Robert E. Hill who oversees the co-op, is asking for advice. Listen as Robert Braverman, a partner in Braverman Greenspun, and Dale Degenshein, special counsel in the real estate department of Stroock Stroock & Lavan, help Ms Anderson figure out who the real culprit is and how to deal with the problem.

Watch this! #046 - All Objectionable Language Removed

Philosopher Dr. Diana Brickell podcast on "Accepting an Inheritance and Objectionable Work" in this 15 September 2009 episode of Philosophy in Action Radio. http://www.PhilosophyInAction.com

Philosopher Dr. Diana Brickell podcast on "Accepting an Inheritance and Objectionable Work" in this 15 September 2009 episode of Philosophy in Action Radio. http://www.PhilosophyInAction.com

David Dark leads a workshop the world-making, wonder-working power of the truthful word. Participants will consider the lyrical as a form of crazy prevention.