Podcasts about Simultaneity

Dr. C.S. Unnikrishnan is a professor at the School of Quantum Technology at the Defense Institute of Advanced Technology. Unnikrishnan is also a key member of the LIGO-India project and a member of the global LIGO Scientific Collaboration. His work has led him to some revolutionary conclusions about the nature of gravity, light, and the missing medium for these invisible actions. Our conversation gets into the details of his Machian approach to understanding the cosmos, which his calls "cosmic gravity." We discuss Henri Bergson's criticism of relativity, Einstein's transformation into quantum mascot, and issues with simultaneity in cosmic physics. Tell us your thoughts in the comments! Paper discussed in this podcast: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1466/1/012007 Sign up for our Patreon and get episodes early + join our weekly Patron Chat https://bit.ly/3lcAasB 00:00 Go! 00:04:57 Revisiting old experiments to learn something new 00:13:23 A lack of absolute reference points 00:25:05 Reevaluating Einstein a Century On 00:35:22 Testing the constancy of the speed of light 00:43:25 Why is breaking physics preferred to an undetectable aether? 00:54:36 Evidence of light speed changes 01:04:39 Could Michaelson & Morley have given a different result? 01:21:16 Why was Michaelson's 1925 detection of the aether ignored? 01:25:38 Henri Bergson, Einstein, and Simultaneity 01:33:17 Simultaneity that is experienced 01:42:19 Mathematical elegance in conflict with reality 01:48:59 Is revisiting the constancy of light speed possible? 01:56:08 The solutions offered by a Machian paradigm 02:03:59 One universal frame intro 02:09:10 Are there two theories about light possible, or can only one prevail? 02:20:54 Is there an alternative to fields? 02:29:36 Closing thoughts #sciencepodcast, #QuantumPhysics, #CosmicGravity, #LIGOIndia, #MachianPhysics, #QuantumTechnology, #Einstein, #HenriBergson, #Relativity, #QuantumMascot, #Simultaneity, #GravityTheory, #PhysicsPodcast, #ScientificCollaboration, #Astrophysics, #CosmicPhysics, #ScienceRevolution, #theoreticalphysics , #QuantumMechanics, #LIGOProject, #PhysicsCommunity Check our short-films channel, @DemystifySci: https://www.youtube.com/c/DemystifyingScience AND our material science investigations of atomics, @MaterialAtomics https://www.youtube.com/@MaterialAtomics Join our mailing list https://bit.ly/3v3kz2S PODCAST INFO: Anastasia completed her PhD studying bioelectricity at Columbia University. When not talking to brilliant people or making movies, she spends her time painting, reading, and guiding backcountry excursions. Shilo also did his PhD at Columbia studying the elastic properties of molecular water. When he's not in the film studio, he's exploring sound in music. They are both freelance professors at various universities. - Blog: http://DemystifySci.com/blog - RSS: https://anchor.fm/s/2be66934/podcast/rss - Donate: https://bit.ly/3wkPqaD - Swag: https://bit.ly/2PXdC2y SOCIAL: - Discord: https://discord.gg/MJzKT8CQub - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/DemystifySci - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/DemystifySci/ - Twitter: https://twitter.com/DemystifySci MUSIC: -Shilo Delay: https://g.co/kgs/oty671

In this captivating instalment, listeners are invited to embark on a transformative journey as host Anne Muhlethaler interviews Caitlin Krause — a distinguished experience designer, learning expert, and author — as she shares her expertise on mindfulness, storytelling, and immersive technology. Caitlin currently teaches a course on "Digital Wellbeing: Healthy Relationships with Technology" at Stanford University, focused on developing mindful strategies for incorporating technology into life design in a way that meets our goals, our passions, our sense of purpose, and our overall well being. This is a transdisciplinary course that looks at the heart of what it means to be human in this day and age, integrating technology and paying attention to how we inform and navigate new terrain with a sense of presence and wonder.Caitlin shares with Anne her remarkable journey and unwavering commitment to innovation and human-centred design. As the founder of MindWise, Caitlin has dedicated herself to igniting creativity and intention in individuals, leveraging mindfulness, storytelling, and design to foster meaningful connections with technology. With a background steeped in the arts and a decade of experience as an educator, Caitlin brings a unique blend of creativity and expertise to her work. Throughout the episode, Caitlin reflects on pivotal moments in her life: a childhood fascination with the sea, embracing misbehaviour and play, her dream of becoming an astronaut and the profound influence of poetry. Drawing from her experiences living in Russia and the guidance of her grandfather and parents, Caitlin shares insights into her interdisciplinary approach to life and work, shaping her worldview and informing her groundbreaking contributions to the field.Next Caitlin andAnne delve into the world of extended reality (XR), discussing the importance of creating safe spaces for exploration, setting intentions, and understanding the transformative potential of neuroplasticity. Through Caitlin's expertise and Anne's experiences in creating immersive XR environments, they uncover the profound connection between wonder, awe, and neuroplasticity, highlighting the power of imagination and presence in finding happiness.Join Caitlin and Anne on a journey of discovery as they traverse the physical, imaginary and digital realms, seeking balance and intentionality in our collective exploration of immersive experiences. A warm and inspiring interview. Enjoy!*** Selected links from episode: p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 22.5px; font: 15.0px '.AppleSystemUIFont'; color: #1f2225} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 22.5px; font: 15.0px '.AppleSystemUIFont'; color: #0f5492} span.s1 {font-family: '.SFNS-Regular'; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-size: 15.00px} span.s2 {font-family: '.SFNS-Regular'; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-size: 15.00px; text-decoration: underline ; color: #0f5492} span.s3 {font-family: '.SFNS-Regular'; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-size: 15.00px; color: #1f2225} span.s4 {font-family: '.SFNS-Regular'; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-size: 15.00px; text-decoration: underline} You can find Caitlin at CaitlinKrause.comor on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/caitlinkrause/And on InstagramHorseshoe crabsHarvard Project ZeroPaul SalopekYuri Gagarin day is April 12thWhat is an ROTC program - https://www.todaysmilitary.com/education-training/rotc-programsThe artist Fabio Gianpietro that Anne mentions, 2016 Hyperplanes of Simultaneity, Personale, Palazzo Reale, MilanoBlanca LiLe Bal de ParisThe Hero's JourneyJoseph CampbellChristopher VoglerMihaly Csikszentmihalyi who wrote FlowEllen Langer, professor in the Psychology Department at Harvard UniversityThe book Harold and the Purple Crayon  This episode is brought to you by AVM Consulting Struggling to connect with your audience? Feeling disconnected from your brand's purpose? Is motivating your team becoming a daunting task?AVM Consulting offers a unique blend of coaching, consulting, and storytelling services designed to help your brand connect authentically, align with your values, and inspire your team to achieve greatness.With a track record of success in working with fashion and luxury partners worldwide, AVM Consulting, led by industry expert and certified coach Anne Mühlethaler, is your trusted partner in achieving your brand's vision. Ready to transform your brand and drive meaningful change? Don't wait any longer. We like to make magic happen.FIND OUT MORE ABOUT AVM CONSULTING HERE. ***If you enjoyed this episode, click subscribe for more, and consider writing a review of the show on Apple Podcasts, we really appreciate your support and feedback. And thank you so much for listening!  For all notes and transcripts, please visit Out Of The Clouds on Simplecast - https://out-of-the-clouds.simplecast.com/   Sign up for Anne's email newsletter for more from Out of the Clouds at https://annevmuhlethaler.com.  Follow Anne and Out of the Clouds: IG: @_outoftheclouds or  @annvi  Or on Threads @annviOn Youtube @OutoftheClouds For more, you can read and subscribe to Anne's Substack, the Mettā View, her weekly dose of insights on coaching, brand development, the future of work, and storytelling, with a hint of mindfulness.

Explore the hidden layers of existence in this episode of The Light Inside with host Jeffrey Besecker. We unravel the impact of past lives and parallel experiences on our present reality, challenging the notion of life as linear.  Join guest Alara Sage, a shaman, as she uncovers the subconscious belief structures inherited from our past lives and family dynamics. Discover the multi-dimensionality of life and how these insights shape our growth and transformation. Embracing the Simultaneity of All Perspectives In the podcast episode, the conversation delves into the concept of embracing the simultaneity of all perspectives and experiences. The host and guest explore the idea of allowing for the coexistence of seemingly opposing beliefs and emotions, highlighting the importance of being present in the moment and open to diverse viewpoints. Key Points from the Episode: Unity Consciousness: The episode emphasizes the idea that all perspectives and experiences can coexist within the framework of unity consciousness. By recognizing the interconnectedness of all things, individuals can embrace the diversity of beliefs and emotions without judgment. Simultaneous Truths: The conversation touches on the notion that multiple truths can exist simultaneously. It's not about choosing one perspective over another but rather acknowledging the validity of different viewpoints and allowing them to exist harmoniously. Tension and Relaxation: The episode discusses how tension in the body can hinder one's ability to accept opposing beliefs and emotions. By relaxing into the present moment and releasing tension, individuals can create space for a more expansive and inclusive understanding of reality. Feminine, Masculine, and Child Energies: The trinity of feminine, masculine, and child energies is explored as a representation of the different aspects of consciousness. Each energy brings a unique perspective and contributes to the overall tapestry of human experience. Complexity and Simplicity: The episode reflects on the balance between complexity and simplicity in life. While the universe may present itself as radically complex, there is also a vast simplicity that underlies all existence. Embracing both aspects allows for a deeper understanding of the interconnected nature of reality. [00:01:36] Parallel lives and subconscious beliefs. [00:07:36] Ego processes in past lives. [00:10:05] Unity of opposites. [00:13:24] Love and Unity Consciousness [00:19:23] The growth of the universe. [00:22:22] Embracing positive and negative energies. [00:29:09] The power of feeling everything. [00:32:55] Perception and behaviors in interactions. [00:37:42] Perception and empathy in interactions. [00:41:31] Ego dynamicism and consciousness. [00:43:35] The ego and divine light. [00:48:23] The complexity of consciousness. [00:53:48] Embracing AI in Communication. [00:59:36] Parallel lives and gifts. [01:04:47] Deep desire to engage fully. [01:06:14] Levels of density exploration. [01:10:21] A beautiful, loving conversation. Credits: JOIN US ON INSTAGRAM: @thelightinsidepodcast SUBSCRIBE: pod.link/thelightinside Featured Guest: Alara Sage Credits: Music Score by Epidemic Sound Executive Producer: Jeffrey Besecker Mixing, Engineering, Production, and Mastering: Aloft Media Studio Senior Program Director:  Anna Getz

Owner of 1350 Distilling, Phil Bragg, joins the show to talk about his entrepreneurial journey and leadership lessons.  How do you keep that initial passion alive as you grow your business?  Why is too much outside input a bad thing, and how can you find that balance?  What can you do to get your team to buy-in on a pivot?  Phil, Camden, and Otis answer all these questions and much more on this great episode!More About Phil:Lieutenant Colonel Bragg's personal awards include the Meritorious Service Medal, Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal fourth award with combatdistinguishing device, Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal, and the Combat Action Ribbon.  After retirement Phill began his business and entrepreneurial journey. He took a sales job with a major software company where he has worked for 7 years and now manages a team of software solution consultants.  Simultaneity, he began working on 1350 Distilling. After finding a partner and a location, Phill and his partners created 1350 Distilling from the ground up. They opened to the public in November 2019, 5 months before the COVID pandemic. Despite these headwinds, they have created a regionally recognized distillery with 9 award winning spirits on the market. They have an award-winning taste room in downtown Colorado Springs and distribute to Colorado, Arizona, and California.Phil BraggFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/1350Distilling/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/1350distilling/Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@1350distillingYelp: https://www.yelp.com/biz/1350-distilling-colorado-springs-2?osq=DistilleriesReviews: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g33364-d19068564-Reviews-1350_Distilling-Colorado_Springs_El_Paso_County_Colorado.htmlTwitter: https://twitter.com/i/flow/login?redirect_after_login=%2F1350DISTILLING

"There is a part of you that was never truly born and will never truly die." - Alara SageSimultaneity is the coexistence of the various aspects of the Self: the human and the Divine: The feminine and the masculine.In this episode, Alara teaches what simultaneity is and how it allows us to experience our wholeness.  She also gives direct tips on how to practice this in your daily life.In this episode, you will learn:Simultaneity allows for the coexistence of different aspects of ourselves and our reality.We are both physical beings with a lifespan and eternal beings without form.The root chakra represents survival in human form, while the crown chakra represents connection to divinity.Masculine and feminine energies can be experienced simultaneously, allowing for action and being, analysis, and intuition.By embracing the polarities and experiencing wholeness, we can bring potential into physical form and live in alignment with our highest good.Support the showReceive a FREE Free 22-page e-book Higher Mind Activating & Accessing Your Higher Mind Gain consistent and regular clarity in life. Connect to all aspects of Self = Wholeness. Connect into the "key of the Universe". Cultivate a relationship like no other. Activate Unity Consciousness. Videos and practices included https://www.alarasage.com/higher-mind-ebook Connect with Alara Sage Alara on Instagramhttps://www.instagram/alarasage Alara's websitehttps://www.alarasage.comDesire to work with Alara Sage? Sign Up Here!https://alarasage.as.me/connectioncall

On August 6, Robert Kelly continued his encouragement to view our spiritual life and the rest of our life as one thing, instead of separate areas of life so that we can truly experience living life with Jesus. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/beacon-church2/message

On July 9, Robert Kelly described the full integration between our spiritual lives and the rest of our lives that Jesus calls us to. He introduced the idea of a 'gospel mantra' that we can use to remind ourselves throughout the day of God's truth. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/beacon-church2/message

Causal invariance is one of the most important concepts in the Wolfram model... and one of the most difficult to capture.So I really wanted to hear Jonathan Gorard's take on it.In this excerpt from our conversation, Jonathan addresses the differences between causal invariance and confluence.Causal invariance means that regardless of the order in which a rule is applied to the hypergraph, the same events occur, with the same causal relationships between them.Confluence, on the other hand, is the coming-together of different branches of the multiway graph.Jonathan explores different ways we might determine whether two nodes, two edges or two hypergraphs are the same, and explains that if we identify nodes and edges according to their causal histories, then causal invariance and confluence become the same idea.I've found myself listening to Jonathan's explanation of causal invariance over and over to make sense of it, but it's one of the areas where I'm convinced Jonathan has a unique contribution to make.—Jonathan Gorard  • Jonathan Gorard at The Wolfram Physics Project  • Jonathan Gorard at Cardiff University  • Jonathan Gorard on Twitter  • The Centre for Applied Compositionality  • The Wolfram Physics ProjectConcepts mentioned by Jonathan  • Causal invariance  • Multiway system  • Causal structure  • Causal Set Theory  • Directed acyclic graph  • Isomorphic  • Space-like separation  • Simultaneity and simultaneity surfaces in relativity  • Lorentz invariance  • Poincaré invariance  • Conformal invariance  • Diffeomorphism invariance  • General covariance  • Confluence  • Church-Rosser Property—I release The Last Theory as a video too! Watch here.Kootenay Village Ventures Inc.

Originally recorded as a trial episode back in mid-2020 during the early days of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Tom discusses whether building mega-skyscrapers next to the Empire State Building would disfigure the the New York City skyline.SEE: 15 Penn PlazaSEE: The Guardian (2010)—New York skyscraper to rival Empire State BuildingSEE: List of the Tallest Buildings in the WorldSEE: Burj KhalifaSEE: Space ElevatorThe gents discuss whether cinemas and big-budget movies are on the way out due to all the new streaming services.SEE: List of most expensive films ever producedTom asks David and Zack what the traffic rules are for stopping for a school bus with an active stop-sign on a divided highway.SEE: School Bus Laws By State—When to stop and when not to!Zack struggles to contemplate Tyrannosaurus as a big chicken.SEE: NYT (2019)—T.Rex Like You Haven't Seen Him: With FeathersSEE: SupervolcanosSEE: Geocentric vs. Heliocentric UniversesSEE: Relativity of Simultaneity

The simultaneity of emission from approaching and receding jets by Thomas J. Maccarone et al. on Thursday 22 September We show that the standard Blandford-K"onigl model for compact conical relativistic jets has a peculiar feature: at a given observed frequency of radiation, the emission from the approaching jet arrives at the location of a distant observer at the same time as the emission from the counterjet for all finite inclination angles. We show that this result can be used to determine whether jets are genuinely symmetric, if the cross-coherence between radio and X-ray time series can be measured at high Fourier frequency for a sample of neutron star X-ray binaries with a range of inclination angles. We also discuss echo mapping techniques that can be used to look for deviations from the standard model in high cadence time series data on X-ray binary jets, and conclude that these can plausibly be applied to some systems. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.10397v1

The simultaneity of emission from approaching and receding jets by Thomas J. Maccarone et al. on Thursday 22 September We show that the standard Blandford-K"onigl model for compact conical relativistic jets has a peculiar feature: at a given observed frequency of radiation, the emission from the approaching jet arrives at the location of a distant observer at the same time as the emission from the counterjet for all finite inclination angles. We show that this result can be used to determine whether jets are genuinely symmetric, if the cross-coherence between radio and X-ray time series can be measured at high Fourier frequency for a sample of neutron star X-ray binaries with a range of inclination angles. We also discuss echo mapping techniques that can be used to look for deviations from the standard model in high cadence time series data on X-ray binary jets, and conclude that these can plausibly be applied to some systems. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.10397v1

Concrete examples of how we can understand and play with the timelessness of reality 

Continuing our discussion from episode 106, we will find yet more ways to alter chords. We will listen to non-dominant, extended tertian chords. We will marvel at the common tone diminished chord. We will revisit linear chromaticism and reckon with the appoggiatura chord. Finally, we will ponder a few good simultaneities!

The Movie "Everything Everywhere All At Once" - The Simultaneity of Time with David Hoffmeister - Renovatio Residential Movie RetreatSo, simultaneous time as opposed to linear time, what does it mean? It seems to be an oxymoron and a contradiction in terms. Simultaneous time is entirely different from linear time. This movie will help us move toward the experience of simultaneous time or the present moment. You have made up names for everything you see. Each one becomes a separate entity identified by its name. By this, you carve it out of the unity. You designate its unique attributes and set it off from other things by emphasizing the space surrounding it. You see something where nothing is and see nothing where there is unity, a space between all things and you. When you feel afraid, it's the ego's fear of wholeness. You've become accustomed to pieces and parts, naming little things and adapting; you feel like the pieces and the elements, and the separation is natural. But the threat to this fragmented perception is wholeness. It is oneness. Oneness is the big threat.Enjoy David's commentary and at the beginning of this session, David played two songs to get in the mood for the movie. It was, "Say Goodbye" by Bliss - https://youtu.be/2FtF7_ww2cE"Throne Room" by Kim Walker-Smith - https://youtu.be/A1Ljl32SqRcIf you want to know more about Living Miracles, and Online Weekly Movie Workshops, look here: https://bit.ly/ACIM-Movie-Workshop.Look for more info on David Hoffmeister and upcoming events: https://circle.livingmiraclescenter.org/events.The movie retreat session was recorded Thursday, May 19, 2022, in Duchesne, Utah.

Can we do two things at once? Sources

Simultaneously Righteous and Sinner

Simultaneously Righteous and Sinner

Simultaneously Righteous and Sinner

Author Theresa Rocha Beardall discusses her article, "Settler Simultaneity and Anti-Indigenous Racism at Land-Grant Universities," published in the January 2022 issue of Sociology of Race and Ethnicity.

In this week's episode, we go over the simultaneity principle.  This acknowledges that if we get curious and ask positive and powerful questions, the questions set the direction.  In other words, good questions steer us in the direction of our thinking.  The questions, at times, are more impactful than the answers.

Extensive recordof Master Dogen's Zen mindand still not enough* * *In the introduction to Dogen's Extensive Record, Eihei Koroku, my copy a gift from Shohaku Okurmura, who collaborated in translating with the American Zen Priest Taigen Dan Leighton, Leighton reminds us that “…Dogen's intent is not to present doctrines of philosophical positions, but to encourage deepening religious practice.” By which, of course Master Dogen means primarily zazen, but also to study these teachings from Buddhism thoroughly in practice, reflecting upon the more obscure or arcane lessons from Buddha on down through the Chinese masters in light of our own experience on the cushion. With the caveat that we are not to assume that a cursory or superficial examination of that experience is dependable. We have to sit still enough, for long enough, for any insight to transpire. How still is still enough? And how long is long enough? Only you can know for sure. If there is any doubt about this in your mind, it is not enough. Doubt itself has to sharpen into Great Doubt, it is said.Shortly afterwards, in the same section, “Using Eihei Koroku as a Practice Tool,” after pointing out that practically 100% of Dogen's teachings are oriented to the practice of zazen, he quotes Bob Dylan as reflecting the same spirit of inquiry in song: “A question in your nerves is lit, yet you know that there is no answer fit to satisfy, ensure you not to quit, to keep it in your mind and not forget, that it is not he or she or them or it that you belong to.” Quintessentially American, the creativity in Dylan is more than matched by that of Dogen, in inspiring this essentially scientific, and yet poetic, approach to Zen.Owing to the exhaustive and extensive, encyclopedic nature of this collection of Dogen's teachings, 645 pages not including appendices, with most of the recorded live teachings being brief enough to fit more than one to a page, it is not possible to deal with in any comprehensive fashion here. Instead, I will offer the tiniest tip of the iceberg, quoting Dharma Hall Discourse number 431. This is not exactly an arbitrary choice on my part, as it is about where I am in the full re-reading of the text, cover-to-cover. This one is fairly typical in its length, as well as Master Dogen's spontaneous approach to expounding upon well-known (at that time) historical events and classical teachings from Chinese Buddhism. It also touches on what I feel is one of the most compelling events in the history of Zen Buddhism, the first meeting and exchange of the Sixth Ancestor in China, commonly referred to as Huineng, with his teacher, the Fifth Ancestor Daman Hongren. It also resonates, in my opinion, with a contemporary issue of considerable concern, friction and frustration, that of immigration. [Brackets are by the translators.] Southern Buddha Nature431. Dharma Hall DiscourseI can remember, lay practitioner Lu [later the sixth ancestor, Dajian Huineng] visited the fifth ancestor [Daman Hongren].The [fifth] ancestor asked, “Where are you from?”Lu replied, “I am from Lingnan in the south.”The ancestor asked, “What is it you are seeking?”Lu said, “I seek to become a buddha.”The ancestor said, “People from the south have no Buddha nature.”Lu said, “People have south or north; the Buddha nature does not have south or north.”The ancestor realized that this person was a vessel [of Dharma], and allowed him to enter the hall for lay postulants.Although the fifth ancestor and sixth ancestor spoke like this, I, their descendant Eiheiji, have a bit more to say. Great assembly, would you like to understand this clearly? Although [Lu] picked up a single blade of grass, he had not yet offered five flowers.The footnotes, which are another asset of this volume, are quite extensive in themselves, filling in the blanks for those readers who are not especially scholarly, such as myself. Here they explain that “Lingnan is a large section of Canton, in south China. People from Lingnan were considered provincial and ignorant.” This is where I find the resonance with the contemporary contempt, expressed in certain circles, for our neighbors to the south, in Mexico and beyond. But buddha-nature, much like human nature, cannot be consigned to only those who are like us. It's either all or nothing, no exceptions.Note that he starts by saying “I can remember,” which he does frequently. I think this may be equivalent to the traditional “Thus have I heard” introducing teachings attributed to Shakyamuni Buddha, as a way of authenticating them. Here, Dogen's memory must be of an anecdote he has studied in writing, or one that his teachers had quoted. Nowadays of course we have the more labor-intensive requirement to thoroughly and accurately attribute any quote to its proximate source, usually in print format, but more and more from online search engines and live or recorded audio-video sources, such as this podcast. The Internet has at one and the same time made this infinitely more doable, and infinitely more complex. We literally have whole libraries at our fingertips, as opposed to scrolls of rice paper.Also in Fukanzazengi, Master Dogen urges us to “…give up even the idea of becoming a buddha” when we begin zazen, after “stopping the function of your mind” to engage in judgmental discourse. Huineng's declaration that this is indeed his purpose would thus normally be taken as the unenlightened view of the novice, but he had had some definitively profound experience leading up to this meeting, when overhearing a monk reciting the Diamond Cutter Sutra, a line defining the true nature of Mind had hit him like a ton of bricks. He had made his way to Hongren's monastery to clarify the Great Matter, without having had any training in, or study of, buddha-dharma. He was said to be illiterate, at least in the context of his times, and was a relatively young man, somewhere in his mid-twenties. This also happens to be the age that our founder, Matsuoka Roshi, came to America, and my age when I met him in the 1960s in Chicago.Hongren's teasing statement that southerners have no buddha-nature is similar to what my fellow Zen students in Chicago said, when I announced that I was moving to Atlanta, in part to bring Zen to the South. They retorted, “Southerners do not do Zen!” I responded, “That's the point!” So now we are the Southern School of Sudden enlightenment, as Huineng's sect was later known. Actually, of course, the binary of sudden and gradual cannot be separated anymore than hot and cold, light and dark. We are suddenly awakened in the moment, or moment-after-moment, but it took the whole of history of the universe to get here. Lung-ya's “Those who in the past were not enlightened will now be enlightened.”Note that Hongren allowed Huineng to “enter the hall for lay postulants.” This tells us that by that time, lay practice was recognized, and perhaps “separate but equal” to that for monastics. Just as Master Dogen had respected the hierarchy in the Chinese monastery of his teacher Rujing, with himself as an outlander at the bottom of the totem pole, apparently the distinction between bhikkhus and bhikkhunis, versus lay men and women, had survived from Buddha's India down to the 600s of the common era.The “five flowers,” as another footnote informs us, “…may refer to the five houses of Ch'an that derived from Huineng's influence. But Dogen's statement implies the need to see multiplicity as well as the oneness of Buddha nature.” Again, contemporary perspectives on ideology reflected in ancient wisdom. The current term of art would be “diversity” rather than multiplicity, perhaps, but the implication is the same. The oneness is seen in the “single blade of grass,” an image that is frequently used in Zen literature to indicate the wholeness in the particular, the many reflected in the one. As Dogen says in Fukanzazengi, “The buddha-way is leaping clear of the many and the one…” The reality is that both things are true at the same time. Simultaneity takes precedence over linearity.Dogen closes with his boilerplate signoff, including a claim to be descended from the old guys whom he remembers having this run-in, and follows with a clarification that is only clarifying if you already have a clue as to what he is talking about. This amounts to the tip of the tip of the iceberg — that part that may be brushed off by the wing of an eagle flying by once a year — to steal from an old metaphor for immeasurability. I hope it has been enough to dig deeper into this early genius of Zen, the founder of our Soto practice, in Japan's medieval time. You could do worse than to at least read the Shobogenzo if you want more than cursory glimpse of Japan's greatest thinker — one who taught the art of nonthinking.* * *Elliston Roshi is guiding teacher of the Atlanta Soto Zen Center and abbot of the Silent Thunder Order. He is also a gallery-represented fine artist expressing his Zen through visual poetry, or “music to the eyes.”UnMind is a production of the Atlanta Soto Zen Center in Atlanta, Georgia and the Silent Thunder Order. You can support these teachings by PayPal to donate@STorder.org. Gassho.Producer: Kyōsaku Jon Mitchell

* RSR's Light Speed Experiment Proposal: A 2019 article posted here at Real Science Radio (at rsr.org/stretch) proposed an experiment, Einstein, Lisle, and Hartnett notwithstanding, that just might enable the measurement of the one-way speed of light. Let's think through the following.* Billions of Frames Per Second Cameras: The field of physics almost with one voice has maintained for over a century that the one-way speed of light cannot be measured and therefore that it cannot be shown to be equal to its roundtrip speed. Do high speed cameras require a reassessment of that long-standing claim? Transmission of light filmed at CIT at 100 billion FPS.* A Fast Camera Proposal for a One-Way Measurement: RSR's asks whether 10-trillion FPS cameras (and Caltech's planned faster versions) might be used in a round-trip configuration to challenge the conventionality thesis and measure the one-way speed of light. Here's the concept for neutralizing that pesky 2-way speed of light problem... * Light Speed in a Vacuum: To state the problem more fully, it's the one-way speed of light in a vacuum that can't be measured. Scientists at Cambridge and Harvard have slowed light down to 38 mph by shooting a laser through extremely cold sodium atoms, so it's relatively easy to measure that one-way speed. But this RSR experiment, especially its second iteration, through water vapor, will measure a speed so very close to the speed through a vacuum that the difference cannot falsify the primary results, that is, that it is possible to measure light's one-way speed! After all, there is no known perfect vacuum, not at CERN and not even in space. So if anyone wants to quibble they might as well argue that physicists have never measured even the roundtrip speed of light. For interestingly, even interstellar space is estimated to contain anywhere from a million molecules per cubic centimeter down to a thousand atoms per cubic meter. If you'd like to help RSR, please consider Donating,Subscribing, or See our Research Wish List!* Vacuum Rabbit Trail: The European Organization for Nuclear Research has bragging rights for their massive super-rarified ultra high vacuum that they compare to the vacuum in space as far away from Earth as the moon. One RSR caveat on that though. It just so happens that the Earth's atmosphere extends beyond the Moon. So that environment isn't as void of particles as many may expect. And that atmospher extension is another young-earth argument because it is one of scores of transient conditions and events in the solar system that could not long persist. And while we're on this rabbit trail, the more than 100 annual meteor showers caused by Earth flying through known streams of cosmic debris is evidence, directly observed by millions of people, that Earth orbits in a dusty region of space, whereas evidence only known to those who study the solar system tells us that as the asteroid belt is approached the estimated number of micrometeroites per cubic kilometer decreases significantly. So something, recently, dirtied up Earth's environment.)* Light Speed in Milk and Stuff: RSR's proposed light speed experiment is performed first with the bottle filled with water and a splash of milk. The milk sufficiently increases the refractivity of the medium so that the laser's progress can be captured on video. The experiment is then repeated with the bottle empty except for some water vapor. The speed of light in a vacuum is: - 50% faster than in glass - 25% faster than in water, but only negligibly faster - three hundredths of 1% than in air. Of course the introduction of milk in the water, and even the water vapor alone, will reduce the speed of light through these mediums. But that reduction should be quantifiable and sufficiently minimal as to not prevent the one-way measurement of the speed of light (unless, as pointed out above, it is argued that the 2-way speed can never be measured). Grand Prize!* Photons Bouncing Off Photons: A laser pulse in a pure vacuum would only be detectable, it is believed, by a camera situated directly in the path of the beam. A camera aimed at the beam from off to its side would not detect the laser directly because there would be no matter to scatter the laser's photons such that some could be detected by that camera. If photons normally interacted with one another, a second beam of light could be emitted from a camera and bounce off the target beam to be videotaped, with the camera then recording the returning light signal. If that were possible, RSR argues that its light speed experiment configuration could still resolve the one-way speed question because the round trip of that second much shorter beam would be a negligible factor compared to the lengthier main axis of the laser beam's path. However, visible light photons rarely collide. There are known ways to cause them to collide and high energy photon-photon collisions do occur. Regardless of these particulars though, if this proposal gets to the attention of the scientists at CIT or CERN, perhaps they could arrange for this experiment to be conducted in an optimal configuration. * No Sneakin' Around: The experiment above, first proposed on Sept. 3, 2019, avoids the kind of systematic error that evolutionists make when they "sneak" intelligence into their "natural selection" computer simulations. For example, we would discredit the results if we snuck the round-trip speed of light into the synchronization of the cameras themselves and used that very synchronization in the experiment. To avoid this, the experiment design does not rely on the cameras being synchronized. (And in any configuration, other than perhaps in a photon-to-photon collision mode, the results do not depend upon roundtrip optics to and from any individual camera.) Instead, we position the three cameras close enough to the laser beam so that any roundtrip optics in any configuration is insignificant compared to the lengthier transit of the laser through the bottle. That is, evaluate the results through a range of values for the speed of light to the camera as though it were half c up to infinite. If none of those values changes the overall result of the experiment, we did not sneak in c (as Röemer reportedly did in 1676 when he first measured lightspeed). As a beam transits the bottle, it will produce photographable scatter from the refraction off of the various materials filling the bottle. If the beam's transit to the bottom of the bottle is instantaneous, and it's return trip is at half of today's assumed speed of light, then the cameras' registering of the scatter will show a different number of frames between the outgoing and returning beam as they would if the outgoing and returning beams travel at the same speed on both legs of their round trip. The differences are quantified below. However, if the beam's transit to the bottom of the bottle is not instantaneous (and of course the cameras' frame rates are fast enough to capture this), it seems that the leading edge of the beam (or pulse) would come into view of each camera from the right boundary of its field of vision and, frame-by-frame, pass to left boundary (with perhaps ten frames showing its progress across a single camera's field of view). If this happens, a single camera could accomplish the goal of the experiment, as it alone could demonstrate that the light did not travel instantaneously on its outgoing journey. In this case, we could calculate light's one-way speed based on the width of the single camera's field of vision, the cameras frame rate, and the number of frames it takes to record the beam's journey across that field. The three-camera configuration enables a different kind of measurement. The two additional cameras (above, numbered 2 and 3) along with a reflector at the bottom of the bottle might enable separate video recordings of both the outgoing and the return trips of the same beam. (If the single camera configuration provided any one-way speed measurement, this could also corroborate that result.) Regardless of whether the beam's one-way speeds are identical, camera #3 will be the first camera to record the beam's return trip. That last camera would then record fewer frames between the beam leaving its field of view and when it again reentered its field of view on its return trip. If sufficient frame rates enable this experiment to work, then the first camera, #1, will register the most frames separating it's initial recording and it's final recording of the laser's scatter. For example, consider if the camera operated at quadrillions of frames per second. Next, consider what could be learned if each camera captured on ten frames the refraction produced by the passing laser. Only to simplify this explanation of the experiment, assume that the cameras were positioned next to each other such that the beams entire journey would be captured on one or another camera. So when Camera 1 first registers the beam, we count 10 frames until the beam disappears. If the one-way speed of light is the same as its roundtrip speed, the camera will then have 40 empty frames until it begins to register the beam on it's return trip, and the data from that camera will end with its frames 51 to 60 showing the end of the laser's journey. In this circumstance, Camera #2 will not show 40 empty frames between its first and last registering of the scatter, but only 20 empty frames. Camera #3 will show no empty frames and the reflector, in this simplified explanation, would be positioned at the edge of that camera's field of view. If the one-way speed of light is not the same as its roundtrip speed, and its speed on its initial leg is instantaneous, it is presumed that all three cameras would still register the scatter produced, although they would all be registering that refraction at the same time. (This would be an indirect way to synchronize the cameras, after the fact in the analysis of the data they record. A difference this would make as compared to the above discussion is that the light scatter registered by each camera's field of view would not show it moving from right to left, but that scatter would appear instantaneously horizontally across the camera's display and disappear instantaneously, and not from right to left.) Also in this case of an instantaneous outgoing one-way trip, the number of frames results from Camera #3 will be identical to what it would be if the one-way speed of light were the same as its roundtrip speed. Camera 3 will show ten frames of the outgoing leg immediately followed by ten frames of the return leg (although, there very well may be a difference in how the instantaneous leg registers the refraction as compared to the non-instantaneous leg, as just described). So Camera #3 in this experiment would not be able to distinguish, based on numbers of frames, between varying one-way and roundtrip speeds of light. Consider though Camera #2. Camera #2 would have only ten empty frames between its registering the beam on its outgoing and return trips. That is because Camera #2 would register the laser instantaneously with Camera #1, and would only have to "wait" the equivalent of the ten frames it takes for the light reflected to cross Camera #3's field of view. So the data from Camera #2 will end with its frames 21 to 30 showing the end of the laser's journey from its perspective. Consider then Camera #1. In this circumstance, Camera 1 will show 20 empty frames between its first and last registering of the scatter. So compare the differences in the empty frames between registering the light's outgoing and return trips. If the outgoing trip is instantaneous, Camera #2 will have 10 empty frames and Camera #3 will have 20 empty frames. If the one-way speed of light is the same as its roundtrip speed, Camera #1 will have 40 empty frames and camera #2 will have 20 empty frames. The ratios in this configuration are the same. But by using differing configurations and by determing the actual number of frames it takes for the laser to traverse a single camera's field of view, the results could become definitive. While a seemingly wild idea, quantum physicists can believe as many as six impossible things before breakfast. So, many would not be shocked if light behaved in the extraordinary way that Dr. Jason Lisle and Dr. John Hartnett propose. Regardless though, RSR makes the following prediction (which is merely what most physicists would expect). If the beam leaves a record of its travels on each of the camers, then considering the time that would pass between the beam leaving and then reentering each camera's field of view. RSR predicts that we could calculate the increasing number of camera frames (time) that pass, as we move from the last, to the middle, to the first camera, between the leading edge of the beam leaving the field of the camera's view (as it heads toward the bottom of the bottle) and reappearing on its return trip. And of course, if the camera frame rates are not fast enough to distinguish between the outgoing and return trips of the beam, then just get a faster camera or a much taller bottle. Please send any comments to Bob@rsr.org. Thanks! * On the One-Way Speed of Light Claim from Einstein and Creationist PhDs Jason Lisle & John Hartnett: The world of physics insists that the speed of light is known only from round-trip measurements. The context of this observation speaks generally of light in a theoretical vacuum or in space (which is a near vacuum). Hundreds of laser beam flashes aimed at the Moon demonstrate one example of this kind of measurement. These lasers strike the Apollo 15 retro-reflector base plate and then bounce back as researchers measure the time of the round trip, about 2.51 seconds. (These experiments, by the way, indicate that the moon is recessing from the Earth at more than one inch per year.) Long before these actual experiments, in Einstein's 1905 paper on special relativity he presented a thought experiment in space. "Let a ray of light depart from A... let it be reflected at B... and reach A again..." A page earlier he had described not the measurement of light's one-way speed but about, "establishing by definition that the 'time' needed for the light to travel from A to B is equal to the 'time' it needs to travel from B to A." Establishing this by definition instead of by measurement is referred to as doing this by convention. Regarding this Einstein continued, "We assume that this definition of synchrony is free from contradiction..." And we "assume the quantity... c to be a universal constant--the velocity of light in empty space." This Einstein synchronisation is sometimes abbreviated as ESC for the Einstein Synchrony Convention. * Starlight & Time, the Conventionality Thesis, and Anisotropic Synchrony Convention: Agreeing with Einstein, the consensus view in physics is that no one has ever measured the one-way c but presents that speed as a convention, that is, an assumption, or, as Einstein wrote, even just a definition, also called the conventional unidrectional speed. By this widespread reckoning, it would not violate any actual measurement to propose that the one-way speed of light toward an observer (say, on Earth) can be infinite as long as the light reflected back travels at half c for the other leg of its roundtrip, producing an average speed of 186,000 miles per second. Creationist astrophysicist Dr. Jason Lisle, as supported by RSR friend and cosmologist Dr. John Hartnett, has used this to address the starlight and time challenge by claiming that light instantly arrives at Earth after being emitted from even the most distant galaxies. If so, of course that great distance would thereby be irrelevant to light's travel time to Earth and also to the age of the creation. Photons are both relativistic and elementary quantum particles. Einstein's theory of relativity and quantum mechanics both make so many counterintuitive observations that many who study these fields, we submit, would not be shocked if light behaved in this way. Drs. Lisle and Hartnett, with many others, argue that such anisotropy cannot be experimentally disproved, that is, that light cannot be shown to not have this different property when measured in different directions. Effectively agreeing with this, Grünbaum in his second enlarged edition of Philosophical Problems of Space and Time points out that "a choice... which renders the transit times (velocities) of light in opposite directions unequal cannot possibly conflict with... our descriptive conventions" (p. 366, emphasis in the original). With this Karlov agrees, regarding "the constancy of the speed of light... but other choices... are physically just as permissible" (Australian Journal of Physics, 1970 Vol. 23, p. 244, emphasis added). Various philosophers of physics though, and others, have proposed theoretical ways to test the one-way speed of light. Routinely then, the physics community responds by claiming these proposals include faulty assumptions that "sneak in" the roundtrip speed of light (in much the same way that computational evolution simulators "sneak" intelligence into their algorithms). For example, reasoning can be shown to be circular if an experiment assumes the constancy of the speed of light which is the very thing that it is designed to demonstrate. So this conventional unidirectional speed means that the 300,000 kilometers per second claimed universal speed limit has never actually been experimentally verified and is only an industry-wide assumption made to simplify the math (and to please our sensibilities). Some creation physicists have begun to argue therefore that, as believed by mankind's early scientists (from Aristotle to Descartes and beyond), and compatible with Einstein's theory of special relativity, and arguably, with all measurements made to date, the one-way speed of light from even the furthest galaxies to the Earth could be infinite. Light at 100 billion FPSIf so, human beings would be seeing astronomical events unfold as they happen in a "real-time" universe and Adam would have seen the light from the stars made only two days before He was created, without any other supernatural or natural explanation needed. In 2010 Dr. Lisle proposed this Anisotropic Synchrony Convention (ASC) to answer the young-earth creationist's starlight and time question. This argument includes the claim, as boldly stated by Dr. Hartnett in 2019, that "there can be no experiment that can refute the conventionality thesis", such that no one can even theoretically devise a way to demonstrate that the one-way speed of light equals the roundtrip speed. What follows are four proposed methods to demonstrate that the one-way speed of light approximately equals the roundtrip speed, the first three having already been performed, which we use to address the Einstein's Synchrony Convention. And the fourth experiment, not yet performed but here proposed, which addresses Lisle's ASC. * Did this 2019 Laboratory Video Measure the One-Way Speed of Light? Through water, light travels 25% slower than through a vacuum, at 225,000 kilometers per second rather than 300,000. At rsr.org/asc#camera (and just below) see a 2019 video made at CIT using a 100 billion frames per second (FPS) camera. At 4:33 (see the screenshots, just above) a laser beam is shot through a bottle of water with a bit of milk in it. The milk increases the amount of photon scatter produced by refraction to make the beam's progress easier to capture on video. (The milk of course would also further slow down the light.) Amazingly Caltech's two cameras, the fastest in the world, one with a maximum rate of 10 trillion frames per second, are able to capture light in progress in its one-way transit. The clip referenced was filmed using the slower of the two cameras and yet it captures the laser beam's one-way journey through the bottle! One of the philosophy of science books by award-winning physicist Max Jammer, who was personally acquainted with Einstein at Princeton, is directly on our topic, Concepts of Simultaneity: From antiquity to Einstein and beyond. Written thirteen years before the fast-camera light-in-the-bottle recording, Jammer concluded that the conventionality thesis remains an open question, and thus, whether the one-way speed of light can be measured may seem theoretically impossible, but it might just be that we haven't figured out how to do it. Chaotic CavityThus according to this Berlin-born Israeli physicist who became close to Einstein, as of 2006, no experiment had falsified a potentially infinite one-way speed of light. But Jammer, who passed away in 2010, never saw this 2019 Caltech bottle video. The astounding technical achievement of the CIT researchers has been popularized by YouTube's The Slo Mo Guys. (We've previously utilized two of their videos in our answer to creationist Michael Oard to explain why there is a linear crack, called the mid-oceanic ridge, that circles the Earth like the seam on a baseball.) The March 17, 2019 Slo Mo Guys' video is called Filming the Speed of Light at 10 Trillion FPS. The slower of CIT's two fastest cameras used to "film" the "bottle" segment of their video was operating at 100 billion FBS, that is, each frame equaled 10 picoseconds (ten trillionths of a second) and it took about 2,000 picoseconds (two billionths of a second) for the light to travel through the length of the bottle. On our Real Science Radio program my co-host Fred Williams and I briefly discussed this and argued that this video may have measured the one-way speed of light.  10 trillion FPSA second measurement appears at 5:40 into the same video. At the same 100 billion frames per second, the CIT technician recorded light bouncing around inside of a water-vapor filled mirrored device they call a chaotic cavity. (See image, left.) Light propagates in a vacuum only three hundredths of 1% faster than it travels through "air". (On average, about two percent of the molecules in Earth's atmosphere are water vapor, and "for applications with less than five digits of accuracy, the index of refraction of air is the same as that of vacuum...") So the light beam in this cavity traveling through nothing but air and water vapor must be traveling at very close to the speed of light in a vacuum. The videotaped light pulse bouncing around within this chamber demonstrates that it travels at no discernable difference in its speed in any direction, including when it bounces back and forth essentially in a "roundtrip" pattern. It certainly never appears to have moved at infinite speed by disappearing and instantly popping up across the chamber. Prof. emeritus Michael Tooley from the University of Colorado, argued in his 2000 Time, Tense, and Causation that the many attempts to measure the one-way speed of light had all failed. And of course that too was concluded before Caltech researchers made possible this 2019 Filming the Speed of Light video. (We would be remiss in not warning the public, and the professor himself regarding the horrific consequences in this life, and eternally, about his vile arguments in defense not only of killing unborn children but also in Tooley's denial even that newborn babies have a right to life.)  The third measurement appears at 10:50 into the video using Caltech's fastest camera. A researcher records at ten trillion frames per second a pulse of light traveling about ten millimeters through a milky vile. (See image, right.) See that segment of the video also at rsr.org/asc#camera (or just click play here): 

* RSR's Light Speed Experiment Proposal: A 2019 article posted here at Real Science Radio (at rsr.org/stretch) proposed an experiment, Einstein, Lisle, and Hartnett notwithstanding, that just might enable the measurement of the one-way speed of light. Let's think through the following.* Billions of Frames Per Second Cameras: The field of physics almost with one voice has maintained for over a century that the one-way speed of light cannot be measured and therefore that it cannot be shown to be equal to its roundtrip speed. Do high speed cameras require a reassessment of that long-standing claim? Transmission of light filmed at CIT at 100 billion FPS.* A Fast Camera Proposal for a One-Way Measurement: RSR's asks whether 10-trillion FPS cameras (and Caltech's planned faster versions) might be used in a round-trip configuration to challenge the conventionality thesis and measure the one-way speed of light. Here's the concept for neutralizing that pesky 2-way speed of light problem... * Light Speed in a Vacuum: To state the problem more fully, it's the one-way speed of light in a vacuum that can't be measured. Scientists at Cambridge and Harvard have slowed light down to 38 mph by shooting a laser through extremely cold sodium atoms, so it's relatively easy to measure that one-way speed. But this RSR experiment, especially its second iteration, through water vapor, will measure a speed so very close to the speed through a vacuum that the difference cannot falsify the primary results, that is, that it is possible to measure light's one-way speed! After all, there is no known perfect vacuum, not at CERN and not even in space. So if anyone wants to quibble they might as well argue that physicists have never measured even the roundtrip speed of light. For interestingly, even interstellar space is estimated to contain anywhere from a million molecules per cubic centimeter down to a thousand atoms per cubic meter. If you'd like to help RSR, please consider Donating,Subscribing, or See our Research Wish List!* Vacuum Rabbit Trail: The European Organization for Nuclear Research has bragging rights for their massive super-rarified ultra high vacuum that they compare to the vacuum in space as far away from Earth as the moon. One RSR caveat on that though. It just so happens that the Earth's atmosphere extends beyond the Moon. So that environment isn't as void of particles as many may expect. And that atmospher extension is another young-earth argument because it is one of scores of transient conditions and events in the solar system that could not long persist. And while we're on this rabbit trail, the more than 100 annual meteor showers caused by Earth flying through known streams of cosmic debris is evidence, directly observed by millions of people, that Earth orbits in a dusty region of space, whereas evidence only known to those who study the solar system tells us that as the asteroid belt is approached the estimated number of micrometeroites per cubic kilometer decreases significantly. So something, recently, dirtied up Earth's environment.)* Light Speed in Milk and Stuff: RSR's proposed light speed experiment is performed first with the bottle filled with water and a splash of milk. The milk sufficiently increases the refractivity of the medium so that the laser's progress can be captured on video. The experiment is then repeated with the bottle empty except for some water vapor. The speed of light in a vacuum is: - 50% faster than in glass - 25% faster than in water, but only negligibly faster - three hundredths of 1% than in air. Of course the introduction of milk in the water, and even the water vapor alone, will reduce the speed of light through these mediums. But that reduction should be quantifiable and sufficiently minimal as to not prevent the one-way measurement of the speed of light (unless, as pointed out above, it is argued that the 2-way speed can never be measured). Grand Prize!* Photons Bouncing Off Photons: A laser pulse in a pure vacuum would only be detectable, it is believed, by a camera situated directly in the path of the beam. A camera aimed at the beam from off to its side would not detect the laser directly because there would be no matter to scatter the laser's photons such that some could be detected by that camera. If photons normally interacted with one another, a second beam of light could be emitted from a camera and bounce off the target beam to be videotaped, with the camera then recording the returning light signal. If that were possible, RSR argues that its light speed experiment configuration could still resolve the one-way speed question because the round trip of that second much shorter beam would be a negligible factor compared to the lengthier main axis of the laser beam's path. However, visible light photons rarely collide. There are known ways to cause them to collide and high energy photon-photon collisions do occur. Regardless of these particulars though, if this proposal gets to the attention of the scientists at CIT or CERN, perhaps they could arrange for this experiment to be conducted in an optimal configuration. * No Sneakin' Around: The experiment above, first proposed on Sept. 3, 2019, avoids the kind of systematic error that evolutionists make when they "sneak" intelligence into their "natural selection" computer simulations. For example, we would discredit the results if we snuck the round-trip speed of light into the synchronization of the cameras themselves and used that very synchronization in the experiment. To avoid this, the experiment design does not rely on the cameras being synchronized. (And in any configuration, other than perhaps in a photon-to-photon collision mode, the results do not depend upon roundtrip optics to and from any individual camera.) Instead, we position the three cameras close enough to the laser beam so that any roundtrip optics in any configuration is insignificant compared to the lengthier transit of the laser through the bottle. That is, evaluate the results through a range of values for the speed of light to the camera as though it were half c up to infinite. If none of those values changes the overall result of the experiment, we did not sneak in c (as Röemer reportedly did in 1676 when he first measured lightspeed). As a beam transits the bottle, it will produce photographable scatter from the refraction off of the various materials filling the bottle. If the beam's transit to the bottom of the bottle is instantaneous, and it's return trip is at half of today's assumed speed of light, then the cameras' registering of the scatter will show a different number of frames between the outgoing and returning beam as they would if the outgoing and returning beams travel at the same speed on both legs of their round trip. The differences are quantified below. However, if the beam's transit to the bottom of the bottle is not instantaneous (and of course the cameras' frame rates are fast enough to capture this), it seems that the leading edge of the beam (or pulse) would come into view of each camera from the right boundary of its field of vision and, frame-by-frame, pass to left boundary (with perhaps ten frames showing its progress across a single camera's field of view). If this happens, a single camera could accomplish the goal of the experiment, as it alone could demonstrate that the light did not travel instantaneously on its outgoing journey. In this case, we could calculate light's one-way speed based on the width of the single camera's field of vision, the cameras frame rate, and the number of frames it takes to record the beam's journey across that field. The three-camera configuration enables a different kind of measurement. The two additional cameras (above, numbered 2 and 3) along with a reflector at the bottom of the bottle might enable separate video recordings of both the outgoing and the return trips of the same beam. (If the single camera configuration provided any one-way speed measurement, this could also corroborate that result.) Regardless of whether the beam's one-way speeds are identical, camera #3 will be the first camera to record the beam's return trip. That last camera would then record fewer frames between the beam leaving its field of view and when it again reentered its field of view on its return trip. If sufficient frame rates enable this experiment to work, then the first camera, #1, will register the most frames separating it's initial recording and it's final recording of the laser's scatter. For example, consider if the camera operated at quadrillions of frames per second. Next, consider what could be learned if each camera captured on ten frames the refraction produced by the passing laser. Only to simplify this explanation of the experiment, assume that the cameras were positioned next to each other such that the beams entire journey would be captured on one or another camera. So when Camera 1 first registers the beam, we count 10 frames until the beam disappears. If the one-way speed of light is the same as its roundtrip speed, the camera will then have 40 empty frames until it begins to register the beam on it's return trip, and the data from that camera will end with its frames 51 to 60 showing the end of the laser's journey. In this circumstance, Camera #2 will not show 40 empty frames between its first and last registering of the scatter, but only 20 empty frames. Camera #3 will show no empty frames and the reflector, in this simplified explanation, would be positioned at the edge of that camera's field of view. If the one-way speed of light is not the same as its roundtrip speed, and its speed on its initial leg is instantaneous, it is presumed that all three cameras would still register the scatter produced, although they would all be registering that refraction at the same time. (This would be an indirect way to synchronize the cameras, after the fact in the analysis of the data they record. A difference this would make as compared to the above discussion is that the light scatter registered by each camera's field of view would not show it moving from right to left, but that scatter would appear instantaneously horizontally across the camera's display and disappear instantaneously, and not from right to left.) Also in this case of an instantaneous outgoing one-way trip, the number of frames results from Camera #3 will be identical to what it would be if the one-way speed of light were the same as its roundtrip speed. Camera 3 will show ten frames of the outgoing leg immediately followed by ten frames of the return leg (although, there very well may be a difference in how the instantaneous leg registers the refraction as compared to the non-instantaneous leg, as just described). So Camera #3 in this experiment would not be able to distinguish, based on numbers of frames, between varying one-way and roundtrip speeds of light. Consider though Camera #2. Camera #2 would have only ten empty frames between its registering the beam on its outgoing and return trips. That is because Camera #2 would register the laser instantaneously with Camera #1, and would only have to "wait" the equivalent of the ten frames it takes for the light reflected to cross Camera #3's field of view. So the data from Camera #2 will end with its frames 21 to 30 showing the end of the laser's journey from its perspective. Consider then Camera #1. In this circumstance, Camera 1 will show 20 empty frames between its first and last registering of the scatter. So compare the differences in the empty frames between registering the light's outgoing and return trips. If the outgoing trip is instantaneous, Camera #2 will have 10 empty frames and Camera #3 will have 20 empty frames. If the one-way speed of light is the same as its roundtrip speed, Camera #1 will have 40 empty frames and camera #2 will have 20 empty frames. The ratios in this configuration are the same. But by using differing configurations and by determing the actual number of frames it takes for the laser to traverse a single camera's field of view, the results could become definitive. While a seemingly wild idea, quantum physicists can believe as many as six impossible things before breakfast. So, many would not be shocked if light behaved in the extraordinary way that Dr. Jason Lisle and Dr. John Hartnett propose. Regardless though, RSR makes the following prediction (which is merely what most physicists would expect). If the beam leaves a record of its travels on each of the camers, then considering the time that would pass between the beam leaving and then reentering each camera's field of view. RSR predicts that we could calculate the increasing number of camera frames (time) that pass, as we move from the last, to the middle, to the first camera, between the leading edge of the beam leaving the field of the camera's view (as it heads toward the bottom of the bottle) and reappearing on its return trip. And of course, if the camera frame rates are not fast enough to distinguish between the outgoing and return trips of the beam, then just get a faster camera or a much taller bottle. Please send any comments to Bob@rsr.org. Thanks! * On the One-Way Speed of Light Claim from Einstein and Creationist PhDs Jason Lisle & John Hartnett: The world of physics insists that the speed of light is known only from round-trip measurements. The context of this observation speaks generally of light in a theoretical vacuum or in space (which is a near vacuum). Hundreds of laser beam flashes aimed at the Moon demonstrate one example of this kind of measurement. These lasers strike the Apollo 15 retro-reflector base plate and then bounce back as researchers measure the time of the round trip, about 2.51 seconds. (These experiments, by the way, indicate that the moon is recessing from the Earth at more than one inch per year.) Long before these actual experiments, in Einstein's 1905 paper on special relativity he presented a thought experiment in space. "Let a ray of light depart from A... let it be reflected at B... and reach A again..." A page earlier he had described not the measurement of light's one-way speed but about, "establishing by definition that the 'time' needed for the light to travel from A to B is equal to the 'time' it needs to travel from B to A." Establishing this by definition instead of by measurement is referred to as doing this by convention. Regarding this Einstein continued, "We assume that this definition of synchrony is free from contradiction..." And we "assume the quantity... c to be a universal constant--the velocity of light in empty space." This Einstein synchronisation is sometimes abbreviated as ESC for the Einstein Synchrony Convention. * Starlight & Time, the Conventionality Thesis, and Anisotropic Synchrony Convention: Agreeing with Einstein, the consensus view in physics is that no one has ever measured the one-way c but presents that speed as a convention, that is, an assumption, or, as Einstein wrote, even just a definition, also called the conventional unidrectional speed. By this widespread reckoning, it would not violate any actual measurement to propose that the one-way speed of light toward an observer (say, on Earth) can be infinite as long as the light reflected back travels at half c for the other leg of its roundtrip, producing an average speed of 186,000 miles per second. Creationist astrophysicist Dr. Jason Lisle, as supported by RSR friend and cosmologist Dr. John Hartnett, has used this to address the starlight and time challenge by claiming that light instantly arrives at Earth after being emitted from even the most distant galaxies. If so, of course that great distance would thereby be irrelevant to light's travel time to Earth and also to the age of the creation. Photons are both relativistic and elementary quantum particles. Einstein's theory of relativity and quantum mechanics both make so many counterintuitive observations that many who study these fields, we submit, would not be shocked if light behaved in this way. Drs. Lisle and Hartnett, with many others, argue that such anisotropy cannot be experimentally disproved, that is, that light cannot be shown to not have this different property when measured in different directions. Effectively agreeing with this, Grünbaum in his second enlarged edition of Philosophical Problems of Space and Time points out that "a choice... which renders the transit times (velocities) of light in opposite directions unequal cannot possibly conflict with... our descriptive conventions" (p. 366, emphasis in the original). With this Karlov agrees, regarding "the constancy of the speed of light... but other choices... are physically just as permissible" (Australian Journal of Physics, 1970 Vol. 23, p. 244, emphasis added). Various philosophers of physics though, and others, have proposed theoretical ways to test the one-way speed of light. Routinely then, the physics community responds by claiming these proposals include faulty assumptions that "sneak in" the roundtrip speed of light (in much the same way that computational evolution simulators "sneak" intelligence into their algorithms). For example, reasoning can be shown to be circular if an experiment assumes the constancy of the speed of light which is the very thing that it is designed to demonstrate. So this conventional unidirectional speed means that the 300,000 kilometers per second claimed universal speed limit has never actually been experimentally verified and is only an industry-wide assumption made to simplify the math (and to please our sensibilities). Some creation physicists have begun to argue therefore that, as believed by mankind's early scientists (from Aristotle to Descartes and beyond), and compatible with Einstein's theory of special relativity, and arguably, with all measurements made to date, the one-way speed of light from even the furthest galaxies to the Earth could be infinite. Light at 100 billion FPSIf so, human beings would be seeing astronomical events unfold as they happen in a "real-time" universe and Adam would have seen the light from the stars made only two days before He was created, without any other supernatural or natural explanation needed. In 2010 Dr. Lisle proposed this Anisotropic Synchrony Convention (ASC) to answer the young-earth creationist's starlight and time question. This argument includes the claim, as boldly stated by Dr. Hartnett in 2019, that "there can be no experiment that can refute the conventionality thesis", such that no one can even theoretically devise a way to demonstrate that the one-way speed of light equals the roundtrip speed. What follows are four proposed methods to demonstrate that the one-way speed of light approximately equals the roundtrip speed, the first three having already been performed, which we use to address the Einstein's Synchrony Convention. And the fourth experiment, not yet performed but here proposed, which addresses Lisle's ASC. * Did this 2019 Laboratory Video Measure the One-Way Speed of Light? Through water, light travels 25% slower than through a vacuum, at 225,000 kilometers per second rather than 300,000. At rsr.org/asc#camera (and just below) see a 2019 video made at CIT using a 100 billion frames per second (FPS) camera. At 4:33 (see the screenshots, just above) a laser beam is shot through a bottle of water with a bit of milk in it. The milk increases the amount of photon scatter produced by refraction to make the beam's progress easier to capture on video. (The milk of course would also further slow down the light.) Amazingly Caltech's two cameras, the fastest in the world, one with a maximum rate of 10 trillion frames per second, are able to capture light in progress in its one-way transit. The clip referenced was filmed using the slower of the two cameras and yet it captures the laser beam's one-way journey through the bottle! One of the philosophy of science books by award-winning physicist Max Jammer, who was personally acquainted with Einstein at Princeton, is directly on our topic, Concepts of Simultaneity: From antiquity to Einstein and beyond. Written thirteen years before the fast-camera light-in-the-bottle recording, Jammer concluded that the conventionality thesis remains an open question, and thus, whether the one-way speed of light can be measured may seem theoretically impossible, but it might just be that we haven't figured out how to do it. Chaotic CavityThus according to this Berlin-born Israeli physicist who became close to Einstein, as of 2006, no experiment had falsified a potentially infinite one-way speed of light. But Jammer, who passed away in 2010, never saw this 2019 Caltech bottle video. The astounding technical achievement of the CIT researchers has been popularized by YouTube's The Slo Mo Guys. (We've previously utilized two of their videos in our answer to creationist Michael Oard to explain why there is a linear crack, called the mid-oceanic ridge, that circles the Earth like the seam on a baseball.) The March 17, 2019 Slo Mo Guys' video is called Filming the Speed of Light at 10 Trillion FPS. The slower of CIT's two fastest cameras used to "film" the "bottle" segment of their video was operating at 100 billion FBS, that is, each frame equaled 10 picoseconds (ten trillionths of a second) and it took about 2,000 picoseconds (two billionths of a second) for the light to travel through the length of the bottle. On our Real Science Radio program my co-host Fred Williams and I briefly discussed this and argued that this video may have measured the one-way speed of light.  10 trillion FPSA second measurement appears at 5:40 into the same video. At the same 100 billion frames per second, the CIT technician recorded light bouncing around inside of a water-vapor filled mirrored device they call a chaotic cavity. (See image, left.) Light propagates in a vacuum only three hundredths of 1% faster than it travels through "air". (On average, about two percent of the molecules in Earth's atmosphere are water vapor, and "for applications with less than five digits of accuracy, the index of refraction of air is the same as that of vacuum...") So the light beam in this cavity traveling through nothing but air and water vapor must be traveling at very close to the speed of light in a vacuum. The videotaped light pulse bouncing around within this chamber demonstrates that it travels at no discernable difference in its speed in any direction, including when it bounces back and forth essentially in a "roundtrip" pattern. It certainly never appears to have moved at infinite speed by disappearing and instantly popping up across the chamber. Prof. emeritus Michael Tooley from the University of Colorado, argued in his 2000 Time, Tense, and Causation that the many attempts to measure the one-way speed of light had all failed. And of course that too was concluded before Caltech researchers made possible this 2019 Filming the Speed of Light video. (We would be remiss in not warning the public, and the professor himself regarding the horrific consequences in this life, and eternally, about his vile arguments in defense not only of killing unborn children but also in Tooley's denial even that newborn babies have a right to life.)  The third measurement appears at 10:50 into the video using Caltech's fastest camera. A researcher records at ten trillion frames per second a pulse of light traveling about ten millimeters through a milky vile. (See image, right.) See that segment of the video also at rsr.org/asc#camera (or just click play here): 

In today's teaching we discuss the importance of learning how to do two things at a time. We need to be where we are, present to the people and the tasks in front of us. And, as followers of Christ, we also need to commune with Him throughout our day. Each day is an invitation to simultaneously live our lives while living life with Jesus .

"May God us keep From Single vision & Newtons sleep." -William Blake "When a man has seen a [linear perspective] picture for the first time, his book education has begun." -Robert Laws (1851–1934) "My main argument was that a photograph could not be looked at for a long time. Have you noticed that? You can't look at most photos for more than, say, thirty seconds. It has nothing to do with the subject matter. I first noticed this with erotic photographs, trying to find them lively: you can't. Life is precisely what they don't have—or rather, time, lived time. All you can do with most ordinary photographs is stare at them—they stare back, blankly—and presently your concentration begins to fade. They stare you down. I mean, photography is all right if you don't mind looking at the world from the point of view of a paralyzed cyclops—for a split second. But that's not what it's like to live in the world, or to convey the experience of living in the world." -David Hockney "The anguish of the third dimension is given its first verbal manifestation in poetic history in King Lear. Shakespeare seems to have missed due recognition for having in King Lear made the first, and so far as I know, the only piece of verbal three dimensional perspective in any literature. It is not again until Milton's Paradise Lost (II, 11. 1 -5) that a fixed visual point of view is deliberately provided for the reader...The arbitrary selection of a single static position creates a pictorial space with vanishing point. This space can be filled in bit by bit, and is quite different from non-pictorial space in which each thing simply resonates or modulates its own space in visually two-dimensional form. Now the unique piece of three-dimensional verbal art which appears in King Lear is in Act IV, scene vi. Edgar is at pains to persuade the blinded Gloucester to believe the illusion that they are at the edge of a steep cliff: 'Edgar. . . . Hark, do you hear the sea? Gloucester. No, truly. Edgar. Why then, your other senses grow imperfect By your eyes' anguish... . Come on, sir; here's the place. Stand still. How fearful And dizzy 'tis to cast one's eyes so low!' ...Far from being a normal mode of human vision, three dimensional perspective is a conventionally acquired mode of seeing, as much acquired as is the means of recognizing the letters of the alphabet, or of following chronological narrative. That it was an acquired illusion Shakespeare helps us to see by his comments on the other senses in relation to sight. Gloucester is ripe for illusion because he has suddenly lost his sight. His power of visualization is now quite separate from his other senses. And it is the sense of sight in deliberate isolation from the other senses that confers on man the illusion of the third dimension, as Shakespeare makes explicit here. There is also the need to fix the gaze: 'Come on, sir; here's the place. Stand still. How fearful And dizzy 'tis to cast one's eyes so low! The crows and choughs that wing the midway air Show scarce so gross as beetles. Halfway down Hangs one that gathers sampire—dreadful trade! Methinks he seems no bigger than his head. The fishermen that walk upon the beach, Appear like mice; and yond tall anchoring bark, Diminish'd to her cock; her cock, a buoy Almost too small for sight. The murmuring surge, That on th' unnumb'red idle pebbles chafes, Cannot be heard so high. I'll look no more, Lest my brain turn, and the deficient sight Topple down headlong.' -Marshall Mcluhan, Gutenberg Galaxy Sources: https://old.reddit.com/r/DilettanteryPodcast/comments/nvsg5u/122_the_four_dimensions_of_reality_and_the_two/?

This tactile hand-bound book is anchored by text excerpts from overshadowed contributions of three female visionary artists whose theses and research are seminal to our understanding of visual culture. Thomsen choreographs light and space to elicit wonder and activate curiosity to imagine post patriarchal structures of meaning and experience. In this book group, Sonja Thomsen discusses, among other things:Simultaneity of mind, body and spiritual experience Co-authoring as a transformative art practiceEditors as essential translators of ideas into material and formBooks as portals, fluid conduits to generating ideas and innovationCreating language reflective of non-binary experience Defiance of a singular (or linear read) of an image or experienceThe necessity of rules to create elegant structure for specific design elements Referenced in the episodePoor Farm PressFiguring by Maria PopovaBrain Pickings Penelope UmbricoPiece of Cake CollectiveResmaa Menakem - Grandmother's Hands Lucia Moholy-Nagy - Marginal Notes Sonja Thomsen Website | InstagramEngage with J. Sybylla Smith https://www.jsybyllasmith.com Instagram @jsybylla and Facebook @j.sybylla.smith

Jim Newman shares the paradoxical message of Nonduality with his witty direct aphorisms: There is no path. “This” is home. For no one. He hosts meetings worldwide and monthly Zoom meetings, you can find his content on his YouTube channel. Website ► http://simply-this.com YouTube ► http://bit.ly/NewmanYT SHOW NOTES

this episode recorded February 12, 2021

For educators who feel that everything they love about teaching has been thrown away, this conversation offers insights to help navigate the current turmoil in higher education by learning how universities can co-design a more equitable future of digital education to continue to serve teachers, students, staff and the local community. Our guest today is Michael Gallagher, lecturer in Digital Education at the University of Edinburgh, co-programme director of the MSc in Digital Education and a member of the Centre of Research in Digital Education. Previously, Michael was an Assistant Professor at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul, Korea. Today he works on digital education projects in sub-Saharan Africa (Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda) and often collaborates with INGOs, including the World Bank’s Open Learning Campus and UN-Habitat. He currently works on Foundations for All, a Mastercard Foundation project exploring blended learning pathways for refugees into higher education in Uganda and Lebanon.Michael was a researcher on the Near Future Teaching project, a project that explored how teaching at The University of Edinburgh unfolds over the coming decades, as technology, social trends, patterns of mobility, and new media continue to shift what it means to be at the university. Michael has been awarded The University of Edinburgh Principal's Medal for 2020 for his outstanding contribution to support the university during 2020. In this episode, you will learn how Michael helped his colleagues and students move their courses online by leveraging his experience teaching the online MSc in Digital Education years before the pandemic. Maria and Michael also unpack the role of mobile learning in creating a more inclusive education, especially for underserved and marginalized communities. They also share their thoughts and experience related to the pedagogy of simultaneity and serendipity in learning as they discover their shared passion for audio and natural sounds.This is a rare conversation with a researcher and a teacher who wants to positively influence people’s view of what teaching can be, what teachers are and what role they serve in digital education. Listen to this episode and explore:Introducing Michael Gallagher and key highlights from today’s episode (1:20)Michael’s desire to become a teacher and be involved in education (6:32)Studying education, information science and digital education: an international, on-campus and online learning experience (8:20)Michael’s current role at the University of Edinburgh in the UK and his thoughts on how digital education is empowering the teacher (12:54)The Near Future Teaching project at the University of Edinburgh; the project's scope and lessons shared with other institutions (15:40)Comparing the outcomes of the Near Future Teaching project with the higher education trends in the UK and beyond (19:43)How higher education institutions can identify their probable new futures and co-create their preferred future using agency, and participation (22:05)Resources and insights to help teachers navigate the current uncertainty in higher education individually and at their institutions (24:40)How to anticipate the future of higher education by learning to interrogate the present through the lens of the future (28:05)The Centre of Research in Digital Education: key areas of focus (30:55)The importance of internet connectivity and mobile-first approach to enhance access to online learning in developed and emerging countries (33:38)What Michael learned while supporting sub-Saharan Africa universities to teach online during the pandemic and how he leveraged this experience to help the University of Edinburgh (38:05)Michael and Maria share their gratitude and appreciation for the impact of education in their lives and careers (40:34)A discussion about global education and local, community-led education practices (42:20)The evolution of mobile technology in online learning and the role of mobility in society (47:10)How mobile learning offers flexibility and enables alternative ways in online learning (52:04)How Michael experienced the implications of the pandemic through the projects of his MSc students who, as education professionals, were transitioning their courses online (54:10)What Michael wants his MSc students to learn to be able to shape a more equitable future of digital education (57:10)How a project exploring automation in teaching helped teachers interrogate what they believed their teaching practices to be and what they could be (59:20)The pedagogy of simultaneity: learning in a non-linear fashion, allowing subconscious learning to occur over time and the role of serendipity in learning (1:02:30)Maria and Michael discuss their shared passion for audio content and how recording natural sounds is a form of active learning (1:07:05)What Michael wants to leave his mark on during his lifetime (1:09:40)  Where to find more about Michael Gallagher:At the University of EdinburghAt the Centre of Digital EducationAt the Near Future Teaching ProjectMichael’s Personal Website Mentioned in this episode:Near Future Teaching ProjectProf. Sian Bayne at  the University of EdinburghNear Future Teaching Project TeamMichael’s Research ProjectsMichael’s Audio RecordingsMichael’s Video ContentPedagogy of Simultaneity: multiple references on the work of Michael with Pekka Ihanainen  Production team:Host & Producer: Maria XenidouIntroduction Voice: David Bourne  Contact us:impactlearningpodcast(at)gmail.com  Music credits:Like Lee performed by The Mini VandalsTransition sounds: Swamp Walks performed by Jingle Punks

When I first learned this my nervous system went into shock. "The Sum of All Unveiling and Finding." I used to think it just meant "The Unity of All Being/Existence." My perception was upgraded by William Chittick and the Ibn 'Arabi Society. https://ibnarabisociety.org/presence-with-god-william-chittick Sufi Mystics are a very under-appreciated school of enlightenment. I know here in the West we occasionally quote Rumi and that's about it. Read these and tell me they don't profoundly shake you alive: "Infinite and never-ending self-disclosures of God." "All light is one but colors a thousandfold." "The water takes on the color of the cup." “Wherever you turn, there is the face of God.” "Know yourself and you shall know your Lord." "Only when the 'other' vanishes is there union." "Above all, what you need is high morals." "No one is more ignorant than he who seeks God. However, it remains for you to recognize Him." Our First Book ► https://highlevelperception.com SHOW NOTES

Intention: Navigate ALL Layers - Transcend Paradox Joseph & Coat of Many Colors ALL 8B Hermeneutics of Truth at once Nonduality Whole Perfection Dream, Illusion, Appearance, Mystery Unconditional Love & Freedom Childlike Innocence, Wonder, Bliss “I thought I was a person then there was nothing left.” Duality (concession) Seeking & Finding (Self/God-Realization) - Spiritual Lollipops - Suffering & Wellbeing [Valence] (Civ Architectures) - Entrepreneurial Lollipops - 'Form' 'Time' 'Names' 'Paths' Our First Book ► https://highlevelperception.com Welcome ✌

You don't need to give yourself time to heal. Sometimes you use the concept of time as a soother, but we're gently directing you away from that into the Now. Because you are willing to have your head turned, we are nudging your gaze over from the unreal to the Real. We work as gently as possible. We step over and around the beliefs that you still think are real, and some of those also fall away as we do our work. As we work, the Love we bring to your attention holds you up, fills you, surrounds you. We work with you so you can see what truly supports you, so you feel able to let what seemed real and solid drain out of your mind, knowing it is not needed. Read here Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/lovesbeginning/message

A Homestuck Podcast reads pages 3764 - 3873 of Homestuck! [Content Description coming soon] Credits: [Host] John - @SansmaedaSerket [Host] Aidan - @kousyustreet [Editor & Artist] Alex - @Dechetsb [Intro & Outro] Rhapsody in Green - Clark Powell

Pandemic time. “I'm doing the wrong thing. I'm doing it wrong. And I'm way behind.” Yesterday and tomorrow. Engagement and graduation. My grandmother, the one-year-old. Flying cars—and back to fire. Geologic time scale. Why zebras don't get ulcers. Simultaneity. The miracle—and trauma—of being born. The book of everything that ever will have happened. Do you need to be remembered? Gone, gone, gone beyond, gone utterly beyond. What's left in the pot. Playing with my daughter. “When things feel big, go small.” Damon: https://www.sidestreetcoaching.com Jeremy: http://jeremynsmith.com Matt Mullins/Black Rooster Productions: https://vimeo.com/mattmullins Geologic time scale: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_time_scale “Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers” by Robert Sapolsky: https://bookshop.org/books/why-zebras-don-t-get-ulcers-revised-and-updated/9780805073690 Heart sutra (Prajñāpāramitā) mantra: http://visiblemantra.org/heart.html & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vNbEjdfJCI

This podcast is my most obvious exercise in intuition yet. After a long hiatus from podcast creation, I'm back today with an intuitively led episode. This feels the most expansive & truthful for me at this time, and I'm so grateful that you're coming along for the ride that is this podcast. One theme that arose during this episode: the energy of holding two seemingly contradictory beliefs in your consciousness simultaneously. What does it feel like in your body? Can you entertain this? Let's dance with it for a moment. Join my email list & my most current offerings: https://samanthalynnco.podia.com Human Design Chart Breakdown: https://samanthalynnco.podia.com/human-design-chart-breakdown Share this episode with a loved one, write a review, or post a screenshot to IG and tag me @samanthaconnected. Whatever suits your fancy! Grateful for you, and I'm already doing a happy dance. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

The best synthesis of the key pillars of our ethos: Recursion: Procedure Calls on Itself. Examples: Seed ► Tree ► Seed ► Tree Human ► Baby ► Human ► Baby Reality ► Ouroboros ► Reality ► Ouroboros Ponder the ultimate telos, infinity, eternity, recursion with truth-obsession and you'll get it. Simultaneity is KEY. Gnosis of eternal illusory "time" + 30,000 days / 2.5B heartbeats / 82 biological years to actualize your fullest potential Godhead is the mathematical Attractor that our Automata Orthogenesis evolves to. Every profound mutation in the tape, like airplanes, is made by imagination & compulsive execution. 1B out of the 100B people who have lived have mostly built our world. Get beyond the blocks limiting your potential to 40%, fast more, work out more, sleep better, focus on achieving your gifts like your life depends on it. Push yourself incrementally to 45%, 50%, until you literally emerge in a new Superhuman class of Uncommon. We love video games because we feel like Gods. It reminds us of what reality truly is. Any person with an inkling of anamnesia, 'remembrance,' puts on VR and after 30 mins feels, "How is our reality already not VR?" Inevitably we are heading towards an infinite amount of designer realities that we'll get to peruse at will, traveling to different Earth locations, time periods, solar systems, habitable zones, and even new universes coded with different math & physics observing all permutations of our creativity. Just like an Octave scale, C, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, C, we are in Service to Self (STS) - (E) transiting to Service to Other (STO) - (F) and there is no sharp in between, hit or miss on understanding the true ultimate reality. Get ready because the next codes we hide will be tricky, wake up to the existing hints: Dreams, Entheogens, AI, VR, Simulations, and think about how we'll embed these 'codes of remembrance' in the future to awaken us to ultimate reality. Reality is Recursive. Eternal Self-Actualization Loop. It's not indescribable. We will understand our Source Code. We just need better synthesists, parsing from the peaks of fitness landscapes, making novel mind-blowing connections, and disseminating that enlightenment via modern artistic storytelling. This is the Ethos of me, Allen, and Simulation, our show. Buckle in, we are about to unleash some of the highest value content of the 2020s. You're here early, capitalize on embodying this gnosis, researching, teaching, building on top of it with your own creativity, and together, we will architect the more beautiful future our hearts know is possible. Thumbnail artwork created in Acrylic Inks by UK artist Corrina Holyoake ❤️ Welcome ✌

Episode: 1879 Living in the present: an impossible goal.  Today, we look for Right Now.

Leadership is evolving - are you? It is easy in these unsettling times to unconsciously get dragged into fear and negativity, to just accept mediocrity or to move into a stagnant holding pattern. Yet we humans have an impressive track record of rising above and beyond crisis in spectacular fashion. In his forthcoming book to be published by McGraw-Hill, Leading Leaders with Simultaneity: A New Way of Leading and Following, Dr. Jeffrey Spahn puts forth that crisis, if met and led in a particular way, can create the perfect storm for collective flow, unprecedented Innovation and in sync execution. Dr. Jeffrey Spahn has integrated insights from business and philosophy, arts and athletics, science and spirituality to develop the distinctive leadership practice, Simultaneity™. With a degree in business from the University of Michigan and a doctorate from the University of Chicago, he grounds Simultaneity™ in sound scholarship. After more than twelve years of executive leadership, Jeff taught business graduate students and conducted research on the purpose of business. During this investigation he engaged many of the top executives in the United States. In today’s conversation he shares with us his practical experience applying these principles through his executive leadership clients. What We Discuss With Dr. Jeffrey Spahn In This Episode What can leaders do to create opportunities in the midst of this crisis? How do leaders lead each other – leading and following at the same time? The 3 keys to developing a culture of curious conviction that leads to rapid innovation How to invite others into a collaborative conversation to solve a problem When to practice situational leadership vs simultaneity The difference between collective will and consensus The importance of mindfulness and getting quiet in order to access a higher intelligence How to work effectively with virtual teams Episode Transcript Highlights

Jeffrey Spahn is the Founder and President of Leading Leaders Inc. Jeff has integrated insights from business and philosophy, arts and athletics, science and spirituality to develop the distinctive leadership practice, Simultaneity™. A degree in business from the University of Michigan and a doctorate from the University of Chicago ground Simultaneity™ in sound scholarship. After… Read more

Jeff Spahn "Leadership as Collaboration: Simultaneity" on The Erica Glessing Show Podcast #5008   In this episode, creative and forward thinking leader Jeff Spahn takes us through a new form of leadership the world is greatly craving. A new identity of leadership emerges, one that looks different than leadership in the past. How do we get there? Listen in!    More About Jeff Spahn Since a rapturous team experience at the age of 16 Jeff has been possessed with understanding the dynamics of collective flow, that group experience of being lifted and guided by an energy beyond the sum of the parts resulting in exponential potential. This passion led him into the highest level of college athletics and academic research with an athletic experience and business degree from the University of Michigan and a doctorate from the University of Chicago. Grounded in over 10 years of executive experience, original research, teaching business graduate students and engaging some of the top leaders in business he has envisioned, design and implemented a new yet proven leadership technology called Simultaneity®. This framework and practice draws upon the diverse disciplines and insights of business and philosophy, arts and athletics, science and spirituality. Since founding Leading Leaders Inc. over 20 years ago Jeff has engaged many of the world's top executives.   Clients include industry leaders Capital Group and Steelcase, among others. Capital Group Companies utilizes The Leading Leaders Practice™ in American Funds Distributers, American Funds Services, and now Capital Bank & Trust Co. Steelcase purchased the intellectual property of Leading Leaders Inc. for their top executive online learning module entitled “Leading Diverse Thinkers.” Other clients include Accenture, Motorola Inc., ServiceMaster, FMC Corp., Encova Insurance, Ohio Public Employment Retirement System (OPERS), and Northern Trust. Board memberships have included The Chicago Moving Company, a modern dance enterprise; Omnia Leadership Institute, a nonprofit dedicated to developing urban leaders; and the University of Michigan Ross School of Business Alumni Club of Chicago. Current boards include the startup Prodigii, a new breed of equity firm. One current project includes starting A CEO Education Network at the beckoning of a former CEO client. Go here for more: https://www.leadingleadersinc.com/ More About Erica Glessing SEO geek Erica Glessing believes when you tell your story, you change the world. Discover your zone of genius. Glessing is a #1 bestselling author 33X over, and built her company, SEO for Lead Gen, out of the desire to help entrepreneurs and small businesses be seen for their work in the world. With a strategic mindset, an easy laugh, and a creativity that meets geek sensibility, Glessing grew her podcasts to more than 100,000 downloads in 2020 alone and continues to build search engine optimization strategies for companies and influencers globally. “Global and local omnipresence requires discipline, commitment, and creativity,” says Glessing. She was originally an award-winning journalist, writing over 5000 articles for California newspapers before she built SEO for Lead Gen. Glessing is an Italian mom of three loud teens, a Corgi Aussi, and two very fat happy kitties. She lives in Northern California. You can find her: Instagram Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Sponsor Today's episode was sponsored by SEOforLeadGen.com, an SEO company dedicated to providing SEO and keyword strategy so your business can be seen and heard and generate ample leads to thrive. Resources For your own complimentary 90-keyword strategic SEO guide, go here now! KeywordResearchTools.SEOforLeadgen.com

We are both absolutely uniquely embodied, and totally at one with all beings and the entire cosmos. Different psychological and spiritual perspectives tend to emphasize one or the other poles of these perspectives, but what does it mean to live both as a way of life? Join Trillium Awakening teacher Kelly Yi as he explores...

We are both absolutely uniquely embodied, and totally at one with all beings and the entire cosmos. Different psychological and spiritual perspectives tend to emphasize one or the other poles of these perspectives, but what does it mean to live both as a way of life? Join Trillium Awakening teacher Kelly Yi as he explores […]

Simultaneity

March 14, 2019 - Simultaneity presents an ongoing series based on the Korean Dansaekhwa monochrome movement by artist Suh Seung Won (b. 1941), a pioneer of geometric abstraction in Korean contemporary art. Expanding on a career across five decades, Suh’s Simultaneity series explores his continued meditations on the concurrence of time and space, expressed through interactions between geometric forms and the underlying surface. This exhibition primarily shows Suh’s works created between 1970 and the present, in which the rigid geometric forms found in his earlier works shift into more obscure, diaphanous patterns, creating new depths within the surface of the picture plane. This expansion of Suh’s previous abstractions produces works which appear monochrome from a distance, but upon closer examination are revealed to be composed of a variety of colors, allowing the artist to show the coexistence of the visible and the invisible aspects of reality. Suh seeks to enable the unseen to be seen through the use of the physical medium of paint to render the “world of nirvana”, the intangible phenomena beyond human awareness. The harmonious balance between space and form found in the Simultaneity series exposes a truth beyond the limits of visible human reality. For Suh Seung Won, these works explore the ways in which the consistency of time can be interpreted through the consistency of space in a unification of form, color and surface. Works by Suh Seung Won are included in the permanent collections of The National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art (Korea), Seoul Museum of Art (Korea), The British Museum (UK), Hokkaido Museum of Modern Art (Japan), Shimonoseki Museum (Japan), and the Brooklyn Museum (US). His works have been featured in key international exhibitions, including “Five Korea Artists, Five Kinds of White” at the Tokyo Gallery (1975), “Korea: Facet of Contemporary Art” at the Tokyo Museum (1983), “Art Contemporain Coreén” at the Cordeliers Convent in Paris (1995), “The Facet of Korean and Japanese Contemporary Art” at the Gwangju Biennale (2000), and “Origin” at the Galerie Perrotin in Paris (2016). This exhibition is presented in collaboration with the Donghwa Cultural Foundation. ASIA WEEK ARTIST TALK: with Suh Seung Won Followed by: Special recorded commentary by Raphael Rubinstein Art critic and curator Raphael Rubinstein will address the work of Suh Seung Won in the context of 20th century abstraction and contemporary painting, noting how Suh has developed a distinct approach that highlights the perceptual, meditative qualities of abstraction in which the borders between figure and ground seem to dissolve. For more information, please visit the link below: https://www.koreasociety.org/arts-culture/item/1266-asia-week-artist-talk-with-suh-seung-won

Atac Sezer ist 39 Jahre alt und ein Komponist aus der Türkei: Seine neue CD, beim Label NEOS erschienen, heißt "Simultaneity" und verkörpert tatsächlich sehr Vieles gleichzeitig: Türkisches und Deutsches, Altes und Neues, Traditionelles und Modernes, Schräges und Wohlklingendes ...

Generally, we experience life in a linear way unfolding through time–something happens in this moment, it fades into the past and we make our way into the future. But there are moments where the experience of time can fade away altogether in to a richness to full to speak of. Far from an esoteric experience, we humans were made to know Eternity. Listen in on this intimate episode and see if you can’t already taste the timeless.

Episode 0316 - Simultaneity and the Pathless Path, part 2 (Click on the above link, or here, for audio.) Non-duality of choice and life-learning from the Oracle-Neo Matrix dialogue. Life-review from Higher Self timelessness; incarnation as "study for the evolution of biases & core beliefs... simultaneous with the Creation." * Simultaneity in the Law of One: www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=

Episode 0315 - Simultaneity and the Pathless Path, part 1 (Click on the above link, or here, for audio.) A non-dual approach to causality & karmic operation, life-purpose & soul evolution from the Matrix & Ra Material. True simultaneity as true non-duality, self-transformation & timelessness from higher self view. Free will vs. determinism; from thinking to knowing to completed being. *

Topics: Ship Of Theseus, VM Straka, JJ Abrams, Lost, The Swerve, Lucretius, Coincidence, Mystical, In Between, Simultaneity, Synchronicity, Discovery, Challenge, Design, Characterization, Linearity, Old Books, Digital Culture, Marginalia, 19, Thought Experim...

42 Minutes 275: Doug Dorst - S. - 05.16.2017 Though there is only so much mystery a person can handle at once, particularly when one is buried in all of it, we nonetheless set sail, bound for adventure, aboard a book: a chronicle of two readers finding each other, and their deadly struggle with forces beyond their understanding and we do so with the author's author, Doug Dorst. Topics Include: Ship Of Theseus, VM Straka, JJ Abrams, Lost, The Swerve, Lucretius, Coincidence, Mystical, In Between, Simultaneity, Synchronicity, Discovery, Challenge, Design, Characterization, Linearity, Old Books, Digital Culture, Marginalia, 19, Thought Experiment, Identity, Improvisation, Transcendence, Shared Narrative, Flow State. http://amzn.to/2rgSgPg

A common mathematical equation is, D=CT or Distance = Speed of Light x Time. Explore the examples of a baseball, Train and Miko’s space trip. Consider if space and time are absolute, we have no access to figure out what that space and time absolute is. The whole space - time structure is relative to how we are moving. In Relativity of Simultaneity, there is no scientific way to say which person is right. There is no such thing we can validate scientifically as the present. If the physical created universe had no such thing as the present, what would that mean about anyone outside of our universe? William Lane Craig holds that God is in the present. For Craig, if relativity is correct in its representation of reality, his doctrine of God is incorrect because there is no present. Augustine held that God is completely outside of time. Time is stretched out before God. Consider that relativity maintains real sequences of events and that there is real causality. In SpaceTime, the very empty space itself comes into being out of nothing. Space and time themselves come into being. There is no room for an infinite sequence of causes because time itself appears to have started and before there was time it cannot happen because there is no time in which it can happen. How could space and time have started because they appear to be connected and to have started? In God's eternity, God must be completely outside of our time because there is no such thing as the present. The only way to know the sequence of events is to be completely outside of it. There starts to be an impossibility to conceptualize what is going on. Consider that Relativity exposes the issue of realism. The concept that we get from science is above the ability of our brains to really conceptualize. Physics produces some who say everything in the future is predetermined if we are outside of time and looking at it and others who say nothing is predetermined because everything is ultimately random. The Theological Argument asks, “Is everything predetermined or free?”

"Cause and Effect" and the Metaphysics of Time.   In this 33rd episode of Meta Treks, "All Threes," hosts Zachary Fruhling and Mike Morrison use the TNG episode "Cause and Effect" as the starting point for a discussion on the physics and the metaphysics of time. Zachary and Mike consider the core philosophical questions about the nature of time, such as ontology (whether the past and the future really exist), duration (why time moves at the rate it does), movement (whether there is a flow of time or whether events are fixed in time), linear time versus branching time, subjective time versus objective time, reconciling relativistic physics of time with quantum physics of time, and whether time is "out there" or imposed on reality by the mind.   Chapters  Welcome to Episode 33 (00:01:20)  Initial Thoughts on "Cause and Effect" (00:04:39)  Spacetime - Time is Malleable (00:14:32)  The Physics of Time and the Metaphysics of Time (00:16:06)  Four Dimensionalism - Do the Present and Future Exist? (00:24:42)  Circumventing Einstein - Warp Drive and Relativity (00:26:22)  Time and Ontology - The Past, the Present, and the Future (00:36:24)  Movement through Time (00:38:54)  Duration - The Arbitrariness of the Rate of Time (00:44:13)  Quantum Entanglement and Simultaneity (00:49:03)  The Direction of Time - Why Does Time Flow Forward But Not Backward? (00:55:17)  The Branching Theory of Time (00:58:39)  Subjective Time vs. Objective Time (01:08:02)  Immanuel Kant - The Mind Structures Experience in Time and Space (01:11:17)  Final Thoughts (01:22:00)   Hosts Zachary Fruhling and Mike Morrison   Production Mike Morrison (Editor and Producer) Norman C. Lao (Executive Producer) C Bryan Jones (Executive Producer) Matthew Rushing (Executive Producer) Charlynn Schmiedt (Executive Producer) Patrick Devlin (Associate Producer) Kay Elizabeth Janeway (Associate Producer) Will Nguyen (Content Manager) Richard Marquez (Production Manager)   Send us your feedback! Twitter: @trekfm  Facebook: http://facebook.com/trekfm  Voicemail: http://www.speakpipe.com/trekfm  Contact Form: http://www.trek.fm/contact  Visit the Trek.fm website at http://www.trek.fm/  Subscribe in iTunes: http://itunes.com/trekfm   Support the Network! Become a Trek.fm Patron on Patreon and help us keep Star Trek talk coming every week. We have great perks for you at http://patreon.com/trekfm

Devanathan Parthasarathy, Professor of Sociology at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India, presents this key-note lecture as part of the 'Un-thinking Asian Migrations: Spaces of flows and intersections' symposium. Inspired by Doreen Massey's critique of multiplicity and power-geometry, and Indian anthropological critiques of village studies and urban studies, this talk uses a series of ethnographic illustrations to innovate our ways of comprehending relationality, connectedness, simultaneity, and multiplicity in empirical analysis and theorization of migration, mobility and flows across temporal and spatial units and scales. 26 August 2014

Devanathan Parthasarathy, Professor of Sociology at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India, presents this key-note lecture as part of the 'Un-thinking Asian Migrations: Spaces of flows and intersections' symposium. Inspired by Doreen Massey's critique of multiplicity and power-geometry, and Indian anthropological critiques of village studies and urban studies, this talk uses a series of ethnographic illustrations to innovate our ways of comprehending relationality, connectedness, simultaneity, and multiplicity in empirical analysis and theorization of migration, mobility and flows across temporal and spatial units and scales. 26 August 2014

Devanathan Parthasarathy, Professor of Sociology at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India, presents this key-note lecture as part of the 'Un-thinking Asian Migrations: Spaces of flows and intersections' symposium. Inspired by Doreen Massey’s critique of multiplicity and power-geometry, and Indian anthropological critiques of village studies and urban studies, this talk uses a series of ethnographic illustrations to innovate our ways of comprehending relationality, connectedness, simultaneity, and multiplicity in empirical analysis and theorization of migration, mobility and flows across temporal and spatial units and scales. 26 August 2014

IKKM Lectures 2012/2013: Wolfram Pichler (Wien)»Aesthetics of Simultaneity in Retrospect«Paper presented as part of the IKKM Lectures 2012/2013 on December 05th, 2012For further information, please visit www.ikkm-weimar.de

When electrophilic addition involves a localized carbocation intermediate, skeletal rearrangement sometimes occurs, but it can be avoided when both alkene carbons are involved in an unsymmetrical 3-center-2-electron bond, as in Markovnikov hydration via alkoxymercuration followed by reduction. Similarly a reagent that attacks both alkene carbons simultaneously by providing a nucleophilic component during electrophilic attack can avoid rearrangement, as in reactions that proceed via three-membered-ring halonium intermediates. Simultaneity in making two bonds during formation of cyclopropanes from carbenes can be demonstrated using stereochemistry. Anti-Markovnikov hydration can be achieved via hydroboration followed by oxidation with hydroperoxide. Rearrangement of the borane hydroperoxide intermediate with frontside C-O bond formation shows close orbital analogy to backside attack during SN2 substitution. Again syn-addition shows that nucleophilic attack occurs simultaneously with electrophilic attack on the alkene. Complete course materials are available at the Open Yale Courses website: http://oyc.yale.edu This course was recorded in Spring 2011.

Saniel Bonder is the author of Healing the Spirit/Matter Split and the founder of the Waking Down in Mutuality work. He has been a pioneer in the widespread embodiment and mutual, evolutionary exploration of awakened consciousness for over a decade. Linda Groves-Bonder is Saniel's full partner in their transmission and teachings and a Senior Teacher of Waking Down in Mutuality. Together they are now co-authoring a forthcoming book, The Human Sun, and founding Human Sun University. Saniel and Linda's sites: sanielandlinda.com TheHumanSunSeries.com heartgazing.com Summary and transcript of this interview Recorded 4/17/2011. Part 2 of this interview, recorded a week later. YouTube Video Chapters: 00:00:00 - Introduction of Saniel and Linda Groves Bonder 00:03:17 - A Quest for Spiritual Connection 00:07:17 - A Shift in Perspective 00:10:37 - The Door to a Whole Other World 00:14:08 - Discovering the Teachings of a Spiritual Teacher 00:18:20 - Awakening and the Awakening Process 00:22:26 - The Flamethrowers and the Opening They Created 00:26:48 - The Balance Between Self-Realization and Encountering Others 00:31:05 - The Awakening Process 00:35:15 - Integration and Awakening 00:38:35 - The Importance of Independent Thinking and Freedom from Dogma 00:42:29 - Questioning Catholic Beliefs 00:46:12 - Questioning the Catholic Faith 00:49:39 - A Journey of Exploration and Seeking 00:53:49 - Connectedness with Nature and Creatures 00:57:39 - Discovering Samuel Bonder 01:01:43 - Finding My Ground and Strength in Being 01:06:28 - Linda's Awakening Experience 01:10:16 - Awakening and the Pain of the World 01:13:41 - The Subtle Washing Machine Effect 01:17:34 - Awakening and Individual Capabilities 01:21:34 - The Post-awakening Process and the Challenges 01:25:36 - A New Developmental Model 01:30:15 - The Shift towards Differentiated Self-Awareness and Dissociation 01:34:48 - The Simultaneity of Consciousness and Matter Realizing Itself 01:38:35 - The Neo-Advaita Perspective 01:42:48 - The Emergence of a New Understanding 01:46:45 - The Agreement on Waking Down into Life 01:50:20 - The Importance of Guidance and Transmission in Awakening 01:54:56 - Awakened Leadership and Human Sun University 01:59:11 - Buddha at the Gas Pump

Features include: The Industrial Characters of the 'Verse; The Shipworks: The Relativity of Simultaneity; An Indelible Mark; Vote: Vote Sheriff Bourne; Firefly in Five Lines: James's Choice; The Poetry of the 'Verse: Following the Voices; Interview: Mikey Mason; Music Section: She don't like Firefly

Fri, 1 Jan 1971 12:00:00 +0100 https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6319/1/6319.pdf Kellerer, Albrecht M.