POPULARITY
A new law which is intended to protect nature and reverse the loss of wildlife has been introduced by the Welsh Government. The Environment Bill aims to allow members of the public to challenge organisations in Wales, including councils, on environmental issues such as water pollution. If passed, it will set up a new Office of Environmental Governance, to enforce environmental law, and Ministers in the Senedd will have to set targets to reduce pollution and manage ecosystems.We visit Down Land Traditional Meats in West Sussex, where the owner says increasing financial strain and red tape is putting the future of small abattoirs at risk. The closure of abattoirs has been a long standing trend - in the 1970s the UK had 2 and half thousand abattoirs...but that had dropped to just 203 by 2023.And we find out about a high-tech cattle handling crate that incorporates software to monitor animals. It can minimise manual handling by drafting animals - where a herd is separated into smaller groups - by itself. Presented by Anna Hill Produced by Heather Simons
Send me a messageIn this episode of the Climate Confident podcast, I had the pleasure of speaking with Sandhya Sabapathy, Global Head of Environment and Net Zero at Entain, about the evolving role of sustainability in business – and what it truly takes to make climate action effective, strategic, and inclusive.We discussed how sustainability has moved from the sidelines to the boardroom, driven not only by regulation but by clear commercial logic. Sandhya pointed to examples like IKEA – reducing emissions by 24% while growing revenue by 30% – as proof that climate strategy and profitability can go hand in hand.We explored the growing influence of mandatory ESG reporting, the shift of climate accountability to audit committees, and how these trends are forcing businesses to be more transparent, not just more ambitious.Sandhya also reflected on how to avoid burnout in purpose-driven work, why inclusivity leads to more resilient climate solutions, and the critical need to include marginalised voices in the climate conversation.Listen in to hear why manufacturing might be further ahead on sustainability than you'd think, what we can learn from companies like Philip Morris (yes, really), and how even small actions can build corporate momentum for meaningful change.Whether you're leading a sustainability team, looking to influence from within, or just starting your climate journey – there's something here for you.
This bonus content is a reading from Platypus, the CASTAC Blog. The full post by Cody Skahan can be read at https://blog.castac.org/2024/09/geoengineering-de-facto-environmental-governance-and-alternative-future-making/. About the post: In the absence of an appropriate governing institution, de facto governance (i.e., governance that does not proceed through “proper” channels) of geoengineering has occurred through its inclusion in a series of high-level scientific reports without being subjected to in-depth political questioning about how geoengineering will affect or be affected by notions of justice, power, and responsibility. This governance vacuum has excluded youth and Indigenous People (some of which who are also youth) alike from discourses around geoengineering, a common theme in international environmental governance.
Join us as we welcome Dr. Maria Rusca, a senior lecturer in global development at the University of Manchester, who brings her extensive research on urban inequalities and environmental governance to our discussion. Maria will illuminate the pressing issues of gendered access to water and sanitation services in sub-Saharan African cities, with a poignant case study of Cape Town's severe drought from 2015 to 2018. Understand how socioeconomic disparities shape the vulnerabilities and resilience of different communities during extreme climate events, and why equitable urban planning is essential for future sustainability. Our conversation then shifts to the intricate challenges of water management, both in Cape Town and globally, including the United States. We uncover how merely increasing water supply is insufficient without addressing the underlying socioeconomic inequalities that impact water consumption and access. Maria's insights urge us to reconsider societal priorities and the role of sustainable consumption and climate justice in effective climate adaptation strategies. This episode critiques the limitations of technocratic fixes and advocates for more holistic, structural changes. Finally, we spotlight the remarkable advocacy efforts of Shack Dwellers International (SDI) in improving water and sanitation services in informal settlements. Discover how SDI's innovative use of saving groups and data collection campaigns bring affordable, high-quality services to low-income residents, who often pay more for inferior water services. The episode also extends the discussion to developed nations, examining the broader implications of climate change and the need for resilience and equity in our responses. Maria shares inspiring examples of human adaptability, encouraging listeners to remain hopeful and proactive in confronting the challenges ahead. For sources and to read more about this subject, visit: www.agroecologies.org To support this podcast, join our patreon for early episode access at https://www.patreon.com/poorprolesalmanac For PPA Writing Content, visit: www.agroecologies.org For PPA Restoration Content, visit: www.restorationagroecology.com For PPA Merch, visit: www.poorproles.com For PPA Native Plants, visit: www.nativenurseries.org To hear Tomorrow, Today, our sister podcast, visit: www.tomorrowtodaypodcast.org/ Key words: Urban Inequalities, Environmental Governance, Gendered Access, Water and Sanitation Services, Sub-Saharan African Cities, Cape Town, Drought, Socioeconomic Disparities, Climate Events, Urban Planning, Water Management, United States, Sustainable Consumption, Climate Justice, Technocratic Fixes, Structural Changes, Shack Dwellers International, Informal Settlements, Saving Groups, Data Collection, Climate Change, Resilience, Equitable Advocacy, Oppressive Measures, Hurricane Harvey, Marginalized Communities, Water Shortages, Inaccessibility, Human Resilience, Adaptability, Hope, Atlantic Current
I was pretty inspired to hear Allison's story of walking her beliefs for so many years, and what she's learned. Everyone you have ever met touches the food system, in which Allison's centered her advocacy efforts. Protecting human health, preventing climate change, preserving habitats, effecting farmed animal welfare, and improving the economy. While Alison's work has focused on the Canadian system, I suspect that similar changes can apply to many places. Allison Penner is the Executive Director of Reimagine Agriculture (ReAg), which is helping to create a sustainable, resilient, and compassionate food system. She fights food waste and loss, educates the public, and advocates for policy to enable meat alternatives. She studied Environmental Governance and Political Science at Guelph, and was named a Clean50 Emerging Leader of 2023. Thanks to my amazing producer Chad Clarke for being essential in putting this show together. All mistakes are mine. Reimagine Agriculture https://www.reimagineagriculture.org/ Donate to ReAg here https://reimagineagriculture.nationbuilder.com/donatereag Share your story to get featured on ReAg! https://www.reimagineagriculture.org/share-your-story & EAGxToronto applications are open until 31 July at 11:59 pm Eastern–apply now! https://www.effectivealtruism.org/ea-global/events/eagxtoronto-2024 Also! We're a PFG! Profit4good.org
In this episode Alice and Andre talked to Simon about the United Nations Environment Assembly, also known as UNEA, which is the decision-making body of the United Nations Environment Programme. UNEA takes place in Nairobi every second year and it is always preceded by the so-called OECPR, which stands for the Open-ended Committee of Permanent Representatives. This committee functions as the working level meeting that prepares decisions and resolutions for official approval by UNEA. This year, UNEA-6 took place in late February and I joined some of the preparations for that meeting, so in this episode we discuss some of the things that took place during the OECPR and UNEA to draw attention to those processes of international environmental governance that influence the agenda of domestic environmental policy making. Join us and listen."About Sustainability..." is a podcast brought to you by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), an environmental policy think-tank based in Hayama, Japan. IGES experts are concerned with environmental and sustainability challenges. Everything shared on the podcast will be off-the-cuff discussion, and any viewpoints expressed are those held by the speaker at the time of recording. They are not necessarily official IGES positions.
This week on Sinica, Iza Ding, associate professor of political science at Northwestern University and author of The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China, joins to share her ideas on how American academia has framed and problematized authoritarianism, especially when it comes to China. A deep and subtle thinker, she offers thought-provoking critiques of some of the assumptions that have become nearly axiomatic in political science and other social sciences in their approach to understanding politics in China.3:13 – Iza Ding's concept of “authoritarian teleology”15:31 – The concept of authoritarian resilience 19:58 – The question of regime legitimacy 24:09 – The question of whether authoritarianism is an ideology 26:24 – The China model? 30:58 – Finding a balance between generalizability and the sui generis, and striving toward cognitive empathy and “Verstehen” 42:04 – The state of area studies and avoiding essentialism 49:32 – Iza Ding's advice on how to become a better writer Recommendations:Iza: The Wife of Bath: A Biography by Marion Turner — the story of Alison, the Wife of Bath in Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales Kaiser: the guitarist Kent Nishimura, especially his recordings of “Everybody Wants to Rule the World” by Tears for Fears, “Sir Duke” by Stevie Wonder, “Every Little Thing She Does Is Magic” by The Police, and “Hey Nineteen” by Steely Dan See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In this episode, Venture Media collaborates with the Namibia Integrated Landscape Approach for Enhancing Livelihoods and Environmental Governance (NILALEG) to explore a transformative project in Namibia. The initiative, led by Jonas Nghishidi and supported by the Global Environmental Facility and the UNDP, aims to integrate conservation, agriculture, and governance to enhance the livelihoods of over 20,000 Namibians. Emphasising integrated landscape management, NILALEG addresses global challenges such as biodiversity loss and climate change, aligning with the UN's SDGs. Through multi-stakeholder coordination and a grant mechanism supporting community projects, the initiative has made significant strides in sustainable development and gender mainstreaming. Partnerships with local institutions enhance its impact, promising lasting improvements in environmental governance and a balanced coexistence between people and nature in Namibia.
Forests of Refuge: Decolonizing Environmental Governance in the Amazonian Guiana Shield (U California Press, 2024) questions the effectiveness of market-based policies that govern forests in the interest of mitigating climate change. Yolanda Ariadne Collins interrogates the most ambitious global plan to incentivize people away from deforesting activities: the United Nations-endorsed Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) initiative. Forests of Refuge explores REDD+ in Guyana and neighboring Suriname, two highly forested countries in the Amazonian Guiana Shield with low deforestation rates. Yet REDD+ implementation there has been fraught with challenges. Adopting a multisited ethnographic approach, Forests of Refuge takes readers into the halls of policymaking, into conservation development organizations, and into forest-dependent communities most affected by environmental policies and exploitative colonial histories. This book situates these challenges in the inattentiveness of global environmental policies to roughly five hundred years of colonial histories that positioned the forests as places of refuge and resistance. It advocates that the fruits of these oppressive histories be reckoned with through processes of decolonization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Forests of Refuge: Decolonizing Environmental Governance in the Amazonian Guiana Shield (U California Press, 2024) questions the effectiveness of market-based policies that govern forests in the interest of mitigating climate change. Yolanda Ariadne Collins interrogates the most ambitious global plan to incentivize people away from deforesting activities: the United Nations-endorsed Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) initiative. Forests of Refuge explores REDD+ in Guyana and neighboring Suriname, two highly forested countries in the Amazonian Guiana Shield with low deforestation rates. Yet REDD+ implementation there has been fraught with challenges. Adopting a multisited ethnographic approach, Forests of Refuge takes readers into the halls of policymaking, into conservation development organizations, and into forest-dependent communities most affected by environmental policies and exploitative colonial histories. This book situates these challenges in the inattentiveness of global environmental policies to roughly five hundred years of colonial histories that positioned the forests as places of refuge and resistance. It advocates that the fruits of these oppressive histories be reckoned with through processes of decolonization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/latin-american-studies
Forests of Refuge: Decolonizing Environmental Governance in the Amazonian Guiana Shield (U California Press, 2024) questions the effectiveness of market-based policies that govern forests in the interest of mitigating climate change. Yolanda Ariadne Collins interrogates the most ambitious global plan to incentivize people away from deforesting activities: the United Nations-endorsed Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) initiative. Forests of Refuge explores REDD+ in Guyana and neighboring Suriname, two highly forested countries in the Amazonian Guiana Shield with low deforestation rates. Yet REDD+ implementation there has been fraught with challenges. Adopting a multisited ethnographic approach, Forests of Refuge takes readers into the halls of policymaking, into conservation development organizations, and into forest-dependent communities most affected by environmental policies and exploitative colonial histories. This book situates these challenges in the inattentiveness of global environmental policies to roughly five hundred years of colonial histories that positioned the forests as places of refuge and resistance. It advocates that the fruits of these oppressive histories be reckoned with through processes of decolonization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/environmental-studies
Forests of Refuge: Decolonizing Environmental Governance in the Amazonian Guiana Shield (U California Press, 2024) questions the effectiveness of market-based policies that govern forests in the interest of mitigating climate change. Yolanda Ariadne Collins interrogates the most ambitious global plan to incentivize people away from deforesting activities: the United Nations-endorsed Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) initiative. Forests of Refuge explores REDD+ in Guyana and neighboring Suriname, two highly forested countries in the Amazonian Guiana Shield with low deforestation rates. Yet REDD+ implementation there has been fraught with challenges. Adopting a multisited ethnographic approach, Forests of Refuge takes readers into the halls of policymaking, into conservation development organizations, and into forest-dependent communities most affected by environmental policies and exploitative colonial histories. This book situates these challenges in the inattentiveness of global environmental policies to roughly five hundred years of colonial histories that positioned the forests as places of refuge and resistance. It advocates that the fruits of these oppressive histories be reckoned with through processes of decolonization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/geography
Forests of Refuge: Decolonizing Environmental Governance in the Amazonian Guiana Shield (U California Press, 2024) questions the effectiveness of market-based policies that govern forests in the interest of mitigating climate change. Yolanda Ariadne Collins interrogates the most ambitious global plan to incentivize people away from deforesting activities: the United Nations-endorsed Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) initiative. Forests of Refuge explores REDD+ in Guyana and neighboring Suriname, two highly forested countries in the Amazonian Guiana Shield with low deforestation rates. Yet REDD+ implementation there has been fraught with challenges. Adopting a multisited ethnographic approach, Forests of Refuge takes readers into the halls of policymaking, into conservation development organizations, and into forest-dependent communities most affected by environmental policies and exploitative colonial histories. This book situates these challenges in the inattentiveness of global environmental policies to roughly five hundred years of colonial histories that positioned the forests as places of refuge and resistance. It advocates that the fruits of these oppressive histories be reckoned with through processes of decolonization. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/french-studies
Rural women have proven to be uniquely effective protectors of Indonesia's vast and threatened forests. Joining us this week is Rahpriyanto Alam Surya Putra, the director of The Asia Foundation's Environmental Governance program in Indonesia, to talk about women's forest stewardship and a project called the 100 Champions Network. Read the full InAsia blog piece on the the project: Cultivating Women's Forest Stewardship: The 100 Champions Network - The Asia Foundation
Wharton legal studies and business ethics professor Sarah Light explains private vs. public environmental governance, and how the former is now an accepted and powerful environmental policy tool, as discussed in her new book, Private Environmental Governance. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Most governments around the world – whether democracies or autocracies – face at least some pressure to respond to citizen concerns on some social problems. But the issues that capture public attention — the ones on which states have incentives to be responsive – aren't always the issues on which bureaucracies, agents of the state, have the ability to solve problems. What do these public agencies do when citizens' demands don't line up with either the supply of state capacity or the incentives of the central state?Our guest, Dr. Iza Ding, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Northwestern University, examines one way in which bureaucrats try to square this circle. In her recent book The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China, Iza argues that state actors who need to respond but lack substantive capacity can instead choose to perform governance for public audiences. Iza explores the puzzling case of China's Environmental Protection Bureau or the EPB, a bureaucratic agency set up to regulate polluting companies. This issue of polluted air became a national crisis during the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics when athletes were struggling to breathe let alone compete. Since then, Chinese citizens have been directing their pollution-related complaints to the EPB, which Iza found, has been given little power by the state to impose fines or shut down polluting factories. But that doesn't mean the civil servants working in this agency do nothing. Instead, Iza documents how and why they routinely deploy symbols, language, and theatrical gestures of good governance to give the appearance of dynamic action – all while leaving many environmental problems utterly unaddressed. We talk with Iza about how she uncovered these performative dynamics through months of ethnographic research in which she was embedded within a Chinese environmental protection agency. She also tells us about how she tested her claims using original media and public opinion data. Finally, we talk about how her findings about performative governance in the environmental space translates to China's COVID-19 response.Works cited in this episode:Beraja, Martin, et al. "AI-Tocracy." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 138, No. 3, 2023, pp. 1349-1402.Dimitrov, Martin K. Dictatorship and Information: Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Communist Europe and China. Oxford University Press, 2023.Fukuyama, Francis. State Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. London: Profile Books, 2017.Goffman, Erving. “On Face-Work.” In Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior, edited by Erving Goffman, pp. 5–45. Chicago: Aldine Transaction, 1967.Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. Edited by Jeffrey C. Isaac. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.Smith, Adam. The Wealth of Nations [Book IV-V]. New York: Penguin Books, 2000.Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Penguin 2010.Walder, Andrew G. Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Weber, Max. “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.” In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism and Other Writings, edited by Peter Baehr and Gordon C. Wells. New York: Penguin Books, 2002.Weber, Max. “Politics as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology , edited and translated by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 77–128. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946.
Work with Purpose: A podcast about the Australian Public Service.
As the Australian Public Service (APS) continues to drive its reform agenda, the importance of community engagement in addressing complex issues becomes increasingly evident. Recent challenges, such as robodebt and the relationship between the public sector and consultants, highlight the intricate balance between public good and how it connects to public service practice. But what exactly does "'public good' entail? And how can public servants ensure it remains at the forefront of their work?In this episode of Work with Purpose, we are joined by Dr Millie Rooney, social scientist and co-director of Australia reMADE, and Dr Russell Ayres, associate professor with the Centre for Environmental Governance at the University of Canberra. Together, they delve into the complexities of public service and the essence of the public good. Drawing lessons from the unprecedented challenges of the 2019/2020 bushfires and the COVID-19 pandemic, our guests explore collective decision-making and question what truly shapes it. Tune in as they highlight the sometimes-overlooked successes of the public service, the essential need for genuine community connections, and the nuanced relationship between public servants and politicians.Discussed in this episode:The concept of ‘public good' and its role in the public service.The relationship between civil society organisations, communities, and public service perceptions.Balancing responsiveness to government with community expectations and the current APS reform agenda.Envisioning a future where the public good is central to public sector policies and programs.Show notes:Australia reMADEThe Mandarin | What do we want the public service to be? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Guest: Jeff Allison, President at Delta CleanTech [@DCleantech]On Linkedin | https://ca.linkedin.com/in/jeff-allison-51b48435Host: Marco Ciappelli, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine [@ITSPmagazine] and Host of Redefining Society PodcastOn ITSPmagazine | https://www.itspmagazine.com/itspmagazine-podcast-radio-hosts/marco-ciappelli_____________________________This Episode's SponsorsBlackCloak
On this episode of Free Range, host Mike Livermore is joined by Alex Wang, Professor of Law at UCLA, co-director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, and expert on the law and politics of Chinese environmental governance. Beginning with Wang's initial experience in environmental issues in China, the US, and the NGO community, he discusses the generational and globally formative transformation he witnessed over his three decades in the field (1:37 - 9:36). After China's entry into the WTO, there were some expectations for a broader economic and political liberalization. While there has been an increase in marketization and economic freedom, the Communist Party has maintained tight political control (9:37-14:26). Although formal political freedom is limited in China, Wang emphasizes that there are many mechanisms through which politics occurs; he also discusses important developments in the state's administrative law and responsiveness to citizen demands in the past several decades. Wang discusses protests, concessions, and accountability that operate through less formal means, which can be effective at mediating social conflict, even if lacking traditional procedural fairness (14:27-22:18). The conversation highlights the difference between the US and China in regard to responsiveness to recent large-scale protests which also speaks to the extremity of Chinese policy. While rapid change is possible in China, it is core to the design of the US political system to diffuse power, which limits capacity for rapid change (22:19-35:24). Over the last two decades, there has been a large shift toward greater prioritization of eco-civilization and environmental protection in China. This transition is at the intersection of environmental, political, and economic change. Pollution began to be seen as a governance and social stability problem. Regarding the shifting geopolitics and the changing relationship between the US and China, the level of respect towards China has gradually changed throughout Wang's experience over the past three decades. Globally, China has taken on a much more substantial leadership role, and power in the global system has shifted away from the United States and the single dominant player. Politics, energy security, and economic opportunities played a large role in China's investment into green technologies, where they are now dominating the supply chain (35:25-53:47). Wang covers the human rights story, symbolic politics versus implementation, and the issue of achieving climate goals in light of economic consequences (53:48-56:41). The US and China may be in competition for the foreseeable future, so maybe this competition can be socially beneficial. But is it an open question whether this proxy battle will be enough to fuel serious decarbonization (56:42-1:04:59).
In this episode, Christianne Zakour, Advocate for Environmental Governance and Climate Justice, joins us to discuss shared challenges amongst Small Island Developing States, the potential for more interregional knowledge sharing and climate justice. She shares insights from her work in the Caribbean and the Caribbean Tree Planting Project and her recent term as a steering committee member of the UNEP Major Group of Children and Youth. Tune in for her thoughts on the recently passed landmark UN resolution for climate justice and what this could mean for progress in the coming years. Learn more about the Caribbean Tree Planting ProjectMore information about climate fragility in the Caribbean
On the last episode of the podcast, Mark talked with two experts regarding the Inflation Reduction Act, and the political and logistical challenges of accelerating a ‘Green Transition' in the US. Which makes for an interesting comparison to our topic today.Because these days, when people want to critique how slow and ineffective the US government can be, they often compare it to another country – one that we tell ourselves is where big government projects happen faster and better than almost anywhere: China.But as Iza Ding, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Pittsburgh, explains to Mark on this episode, China's government might not be quite as dominant and proficient as we think. And nowhere is this more clear than at the local level, as Iza explores in her recent book, “The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China.”Even though the book focuses on aspects of environmental governance like conservation and pollution mitigation, her conclusions are far-reaching. Primarily, the idea that even so-called strong states have weaknesses, and when they are asked to address them, they often ‘perform' the task of governing in informative and surprising ways. Watch Iza Ding's talk at the Watson Institute. Learn more about and purchase her book "The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China".Learn more about other podcasts from the Watson Institute. Transcript coming soon to our website.
In this episode we have a debate between Kate Raworth, Bob Costanza and Eric Gòmez-Baggethun on Monetary Valuation of Nature: pragmatic conservation or unhelpful commodification?This is an edited version of a debate that took place at the Oxford Martin School in February 2023. You can find the fill video of it here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl7wSuAuKyQ&ab_channel=OxfordBiodiversityNetwork Notes:The valuation of nature and ecosystem services in monetary units plays a central role in many forms of environmental governance, including in carbon and biodiversity markets and offsetting schemes which are increasingly under scrutiny. The idea of using monetary units to value nature has precipitated significant debate, with proponents contending that it represents a pragmatic and realist approach to accounting for the environment in decision-making processes, unlocking substantial funding for conservation, while others argue that it can lead to a commodification of nature that ultimately proves inequitable and ineffective in addressing environmental challenges. In the spirit of developing a constructive dialogue on the issue, Kate Raworth will moderate a discussion between two ecological economists, Robert Costanza and Erik Gomez-Baggethun, who will explore the debates and tensions associated with using monetary units to value nature and ecosystem services and role such valuations play in contemporary environmental governance.Kate RaworthKate is an economist focused on making economics fit for the 21st century. Her best-selling book Doughnut Economics: seven ways to think like a 21st century economist has been translated into 20 languages. She is co-founder of Doughnut Economics Action Lab, working with cities, business, communities, governments and educators to turn Doughnut Economics from a radical idea into transformative action. She teaches at Oxford University's Environmental Change Institute and is Professor of Practice at Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.Robert CostanzaRobert (PhD, FASSA, FRSA) is a professor of Ecological Economics at the Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London and an Adjunct Professor at the College of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania. He is also a Senior Fellow at the Stockholm Resilience Centre, an Honorary Professor at the Australian National University, an Affiliate Fellow at the Gund Institute at the University of Vermont, and a deTao Master of Ecological Economics at the deTao Masters Academy in Shanghai, an Overseas Expert in the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and an Ambassador of the Wellbeing Economy Alliance (WEAll). He is co-founder and past-president of the International Society for Ecological Economics, and founding editor of Ecological Economics. He is founding editor-in-chief of Solutions and editor in chief of The Anthropocene Review. Professor Costanza's transdisciplinary research integrates the study of humans and the rest of nature to address research, policy and management issues at multiple time and space scales, from small watersheds to the global system.His areas of expertise include: ecological economics, ecosystem services, landscape ecology, integrated ecological and socioeconomic modelling, energy and material flow analysis, environmental policy, social traps and addictions, incentive structures and institutions. He is the author or co-author of over 600 scientific papers and 30 books.Erik Gomez-BaggethunErik is a Professor of Environmental Governance at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, a Senior Visiting Researcher at the University of Oxford, and a senior scientific advisor at the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research. He has taught courses and modules in ecological economics at the University of Oxford, the University of Cambridge and other universities in Europe and Latin America. His research covers diverse topics in ecological econ
The Sustainable Fixtures show is hosted by Michael Colligan and John Bullock.
What does the state do when public expectations exceed its governing capacity? The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China (Cornell, 2022) shows how the state can shape public perceptions and defuse crises through the theatrical deployment of language, symbols, and gestures of good governance—performative governance. Iza Ding unpacks the black box of street-level bureaucracy in China through ethnographic participation, in-depth interviews, and public opinion surveys. She demonstrates in vivid detail how China's environmental bureaucrats deal with intense public scrutiny over pollution when they lack the authority to actually improve the physical environment. They assuage public outrage by appearing responsive, benevolent, and humble. But performative governance is hard work. Environmental bureaucrats paradoxically work themselves to exhaustion even when they cannot effectively implement environmental policies. Instead of achieving "performance legitimacy" by delivering material improvements, the state can shape public opinion through the theatrical performance of goodwill and sincere effort. The Performative State also explains when performative governance fails at impressing its audience and when governance becomes less performative and more substantive. Ding focuses on Chinese evidence but her theory travels: comparisons with Vietnam and the United States show that all states, democratic and authoritarian alike, engage in performative governance. Iza Ding is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD from Harvard University. Her work has appeared in World Politics, the China Quarterly, Comparative Political Studies, and other academic journals. Peter Lorentzen is economics professor at the University of San Francisco. He heads USF's Applied Economics Master's program, which focuses on the digital economy. His research is mainly on China's political economy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
What does the state do when public expectations exceed its governing capacity? The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China (Cornell, 2022) shows how the state can shape public perceptions and defuse crises through the theatrical deployment of language, symbols, and gestures of good governance—performative governance. Iza Ding unpacks the black box of street-level bureaucracy in China through ethnographic participation, in-depth interviews, and public opinion surveys. She demonstrates in vivid detail how China's environmental bureaucrats deal with intense public scrutiny over pollution when they lack the authority to actually improve the physical environment. They assuage public outrage by appearing responsive, benevolent, and humble. But performative governance is hard work. Environmental bureaucrats paradoxically work themselves to exhaustion even when they cannot effectively implement environmental policies. Instead of achieving "performance legitimacy" by delivering material improvements, the state can shape public opinion through the theatrical performance of goodwill and sincere effort. The Performative State also explains when performative governance fails at impressing its audience and when governance becomes less performative and more substantive. Ding focuses on Chinese evidence but her theory travels: comparisons with Vietnam and the United States show that all states, democratic and authoritarian alike, engage in performative governance. Iza Ding is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD from Harvard University. Her work has appeared in World Politics, the China Quarterly, Comparative Political Studies, and other academic journals. Peter Lorentzen is economics professor at the University of San Francisco. He heads USF's Applied Economics Master's program, which focuses on the digital economy. His research is mainly on China's political economy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/east-asian-studies
What does the state do when public expectations exceed its governing capacity? The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China (Cornell, 2022) shows how the state can shape public perceptions and defuse crises through the theatrical deployment of language, symbols, and gestures of good governance—performative governance. Iza Ding unpacks the black box of street-level bureaucracy in China through ethnographic participation, in-depth interviews, and public opinion surveys. She demonstrates in vivid detail how China's environmental bureaucrats deal with intense public scrutiny over pollution when they lack the authority to actually improve the physical environment. They assuage public outrage by appearing responsive, benevolent, and humble. But performative governance is hard work. Environmental bureaucrats paradoxically work themselves to exhaustion even when they cannot effectively implement environmental policies. Instead of achieving "performance legitimacy" by delivering material improvements, the state can shape public opinion through the theatrical performance of goodwill and sincere effort. The Performative State also explains when performative governance fails at impressing its audience and when governance becomes less performative and more substantive. Ding focuses on Chinese evidence but her theory travels: comparisons with Vietnam and the United States show that all states, democratic and authoritarian alike, engage in performative governance. Iza Ding is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD from Harvard University. Her work has appeared in World Politics, the China Quarterly, Comparative Political Studies, and other academic journals. Peter Lorentzen is economics professor at the University of San Francisco. He heads USF's Applied Economics Master's program, which focuses on the digital economy. His research is mainly on China's political economy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science
What does the state do when public expectations exceed its governing capacity? The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China (Cornell, 2022) shows how the state can shape public perceptions and defuse crises through the theatrical deployment of language, symbols, and gestures of good governance—performative governance. Iza Ding unpacks the black box of street-level bureaucracy in China through ethnographic participation, in-depth interviews, and public opinion surveys. She demonstrates in vivid detail how China's environmental bureaucrats deal with intense public scrutiny over pollution when they lack the authority to actually improve the physical environment. They assuage public outrage by appearing responsive, benevolent, and humble. But performative governance is hard work. Environmental bureaucrats paradoxically work themselves to exhaustion even when they cannot effectively implement environmental policies. Instead of achieving "performance legitimacy" by delivering material improvements, the state can shape public opinion through the theatrical performance of goodwill and sincere effort. The Performative State also explains when performative governance fails at impressing its audience and when governance becomes less performative and more substantive. Ding focuses on Chinese evidence but her theory travels: comparisons with Vietnam and the United States show that all states, democratic and authoritarian alike, engage in performative governance. Iza Ding is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD from Harvard University. Her work has appeared in World Politics, the China Quarterly, Comparative Political Studies, and other academic journals. Peter Lorentzen is economics professor at the University of San Francisco. He heads USF's Applied Economics Master's program, which focuses on the digital economy. His research is mainly on China's political economy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/environmental-studies
What does the state do when public expectations exceed its governing capacity? The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China (Cornell, 2022) shows how the state can shape public perceptions and defuse crises through the theatrical deployment of language, symbols, and gestures of good governance—performative governance. Iza Ding unpacks the black box of street-level bureaucracy in China through ethnographic participation, in-depth interviews, and public opinion surveys. She demonstrates in vivid detail how China's environmental bureaucrats deal with intense public scrutiny over pollution when they lack the authority to actually improve the physical environment. They assuage public outrage by appearing responsive, benevolent, and humble. But performative governance is hard work. Environmental bureaucrats paradoxically work themselves to exhaustion even when they cannot effectively implement environmental policies. Instead of achieving "performance legitimacy" by delivering material improvements, the state can shape public opinion through the theatrical performance of goodwill and sincere effort. The Performative State also explains when performative governance fails at impressing its audience and when governance becomes less performative and more substantive. Ding focuses on Chinese evidence but her theory travels: comparisons with Vietnam and the United States show that all states, democratic and authoritarian alike, engage in performative governance. Iza Ding is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD from Harvard University. Her work has appeared in World Politics, the China Quarterly, Comparative Political Studies, and other academic journals. Peter Lorentzen is economics professor at the University of San Francisco. He heads USF's Applied Economics Master's program, which focuses on the digital economy. His research is mainly on China's political economy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/chinese-studies
What does the state do when public expectations exceed its governing capacity? The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China (Cornell, 2022) shows how the state can shape public perceptions and defuse crises through the theatrical deployment of language, symbols, and gestures of good governance—performative governance. Iza Ding unpacks the black box of street-level bureaucracy in China through ethnographic participation, in-depth interviews, and public opinion surveys. She demonstrates in vivid detail how China's environmental bureaucrats deal with intense public scrutiny over pollution when they lack the authority to actually improve the physical environment. They assuage public outrage by appearing responsive, benevolent, and humble. But performative governance is hard work. Environmental bureaucrats paradoxically work themselves to exhaustion even when they cannot effectively implement environmental policies. Instead of achieving "performance legitimacy" by delivering material improvements, the state can shape public opinion through the theatrical performance of goodwill and sincere effort. The Performative State also explains when performative governance fails at impressing its audience and when governance becomes less performative and more substantive. Ding focuses on Chinese evidence but her theory travels: comparisons with Vietnam and the United States show that all states, democratic and authoritarian alike, engage in performative governance. Iza Ding is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD from Harvard University. Her work has appeared in World Politics, the China Quarterly, Comparative Political Studies, and other academic journals. Peter Lorentzen is economics professor at the University of San Francisco. He heads USF's Applied Economics Master's program, which focuses on the digital economy. His research is mainly on China's political economy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/public-policy
What does the state do when public expectations exceed its governing capacity? The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China (Cornell, 2022) shows how the state can shape public perceptions and defuse crises through the theatrical deployment of language, symbols, and gestures of good governance—performative governance. Iza Ding unpacks the black box of street-level bureaucracy in China through ethnographic participation, in-depth interviews, and public opinion surveys. She demonstrates in vivid detail how China's environmental bureaucrats deal with intense public scrutiny over pollution when they lack the authority to actually improve the physical environment. They assuage public outrage by appearing responsive, benevolent, and humble. But performative governance is hard work. Environmental bureaucrats paradoxically work themselves to exhaustion even when they cannot effectively implement environmental policies. Instead of achieving "performance legitimacy" by delivering material improvements, the state can shape public opinion through the theatrical performance of goodwill and sincere effort. The Performative State also explains when performative governance fails at impressing its audience and when governance becomes less performative and more substantive. Ding focuses on Chinese evidence but her theory travels: comparisons with Vietnam and the United States show that all states, democratic and authoritarian alike, engage in performative governance. Iza Ding is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD from Harvard University. Her work has appeared in World Politics, the China Quarterly, Comparative Political Studies, and other academic journals. Peter Lorentzen is economics professor at the University of San Francisco. He heads USF's Applied Economics Master's program, which focuses on the digital economy. His research is mainly on China's political economy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/economics
What does the state do when public expectations exceed its governing capacity? The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China (Cornell, 2022) shows how the state can shape public perceptions and defuse crises through the theatrical deployment of language, symbols, and gestures of good governance—performative governance. Iza Ding unpacks the black box of street-level bureaucracy in China through ethnographic participation, in-depth interviews, and public opinion surveys. She demonstrates in vivid detail how China's environmental bureaucrats deal with intense public scrutiny over pollution when they lack the authority to actually improve the physical environment. They assuage public outrage by appearing responsive, benevolent, and humble. But performative governance is hard work. Environmental bureaucrats paradoxically work themselves to exhaustion even when they cannot effectively implement environmental policies. Instead of achieving "performance legitimacy" by delivering material improvements, the state can shape public opinion through the theatrical performance of goodwill and sincere effort. The Performative State also explains when performative governance fails at impressing its audience and when governance becomes less performative and more substantive. Ding focuses on Chinese evidence but her theory travels: comparisons with Vietnam and the United States show that all states, democratic and authoritarian alike, engage in performative governance. Iza Ding is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD from Harvard University. Her work has appeared in World Politics, the China Quarterly, Comparative Political Studies, and other academic journals. Peter Lorentzen is economics professor at the University of San Francisco. He heads USF's Applied Economics Master's program, which focuses on the digital economy. His research is mainly on China's political economy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Green Dreamer: Sustainability and Regeneration From Ideas to Life
“What I find worth remarking upon is the fact that the vast majority of people are so alienated from the Bluefin's life world that they don't know what an extraordinary creature she is—and instead just widely see her as a foodstuff, trafficked on the global market. It's imperative for that worldview to change.” In this episode, we welcome Jennifer E. Telesca, Associate Professor of Environmental Governance in the Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment at the Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University, the Netherlands. Her work takes a critical approach to ocean studies, spanning the interests of environmental diplomacy, ethnographies of international law in society, the human–animal relationship, political economy, the politics of extinction, and science and technology in policymaking. She conducts fieldwork at the United Nations and in treaty bodies, diplomatic missions, and other sites scaled supranationally. Red Gold: The Managed Extinction of the Giant Bluefin Tuna (University of Minnesota Press, 2020) is Telesca's first single-authored book. Its on-the-ground, first-person research has shown just how damned the lives of fishes are in the very world entrusted to care for them in ocean governance. Her second book on hydrothermal vents, tentatively titled, The Midnight Zone, invites readers to honor creatures in all their mysterious and seemingly impossible forms at sites in the deep dark sea—open to regulatory oversight—where scientists believe life on Earth began. Some of the topics we explore in this conversation include how the Giant Bluefin tuna went from being food for the poor to becoming a global delicacy symbolic of luxury, how fish have long been "an object through which global empires have been mediated," Jen's concerns with the scams and blue-washing of eco certifications in seafood, and more. (The musical offering featured in this episode Over It by RVBY MY DEAR. The episode-inspired artwork is by Mi Young.) Green Dreamer would not be possible without direct support from our listeners. Help us keep the show alive by reciprocating a gift of any amount today! GreenDreamer.com/support
This week on China Corner Office, Chris Marquis discusses environmental governance in China with Iza Ding, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Pittsburgh and author of the recent book The Performative State: Public Scrutiny and Environmental Governance in China. Iza explained how performative and substantive governance can diverge and discussed her on-the-ground research both in China and beyond. Iza provided an overview of the trajectory of China's environmental protection efforts and the effects of the recent COP27 meeting. She also gave her assessment of the current state of environmentalism in China. The discussion concluded with Iza providing her thoughts on how the economic slowdown and the outcome of the 20th Party Congress will affect the future of China's environmental governance.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
The International Energy Agency last year found that there is no room for any new coal, oil or gas if the world is to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 – a crucial target to keep global heating to 1.5°C. But how do we balance this with the stark reality that fossil fuels today account for around 80% of the world's energy consumption and that in many countries these energy needs are growing?Renewables are cost-competitive and growing, but many countries are still hugely dependent on fossil fuels – not only for their energy needs, but also for government revenue through their exports.In this episode, we discuss the urgent need for a just energy transition that also meets development objectives, and the role of the international community, in particular the wealthy countries and big emitters, in supporting this transition.This is the first of a three-part series focusing on COP27, the 27th annual UN climate conference, which is taking place in Sharm-el-Sheikh, Egypt, in November. It will be the fifth COP to be hosted in Africa – a continent responsible for less than 4% of global emissions, but which faces some of the worst impacts of climate change. Questions around taking responsibility for addressing climate change will be high on the agenda – and in the next two episodes, we will focus on climate adaptation and what to do about loss & damage as a result of climate change.Speakers:Sara Pantuliano (host), Chief Executive, ODIChukwumerije Okereke, Professor of Global Climate and Environmental Governance and Director of Center for Climate and Development, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, NigeriaMichael Jacobs, Professor of Political Economy, University of SheffieldIpek Gencsu, Senior Research Fellow, ODI
Ghana's worsening economic crisis is prompting concerns it will further erode the country's already weak environmental governance system that Chinese actors have profited from in the mining, fishing, and timber sectors. Meantime, local communities across the country suffer amid declining fish stocks, polluted waterways, and unregulated deforestation.Francis Xavier Tuokuu, a leading environmental scholar and a research fellow at the Ghana-based Afro-Sino Centre of International Relations contends that until there is new and better leadership that is actually willing to crack down on the corruption that Chinese and others use to their advantage, there is little hope the situation will improve. Francis joins Eric & Cobus from Keene, New Hampshire to discuss what, if anything, can be done.JOIN THE DISCUSSION:Twitter: @ChinaAfrProject | @stadenesqueFacebook: www.facebook.com/ChinaAfricaProjectFOLLOW CAP IN FRENCH AND ARABIC:Français: www.projetafriquechine.com | @AfrikChineعربي: www.akhbaralsin-africia.com | @AkhbarAlSinAfrJOIN US ON PATREON!Become a CAP Patreon member and get all sorts of cool stuff including our Week in Review report, an invitation to join monthly Zoom calls with Eric & Cobus, and even an awesome new CAP Podcast mug!www.patreon.com/chinaafricaprojectSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
For 50 years, WWF-Malaysia has worked with government agencies, businesses, communities, NGOs and individual supporters to protect nature, and as they themselves put it, to: "shape Our Future where people and nature thrive together." We catch up with Dr Henry Chan, WWF-Malaysia's Conservation Director, for a look back at some of their many achievements, and a look forward to what they have in store for the years to come.Image credit: WWF MalaysiaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In today's episode, we'd like to re-broadcast a previous episode, in which Ang Zhao from REEI and Dr. Kenji Otsuka from the Institute of Developing Economies discussed the role of non-state actors in environmental governance in the Northeast Asia region. In 2021, we saw that non-state actors, including NGOs and industries, have been playing an increasingly significant roles in the global governance on climate related policy issues. We think the discussion may help our listeners to understand why the non-state actors matter in public policy debates despite of the different social and political contexts across countries.
The latest episode of Erased deep-dives into Big Corporations and their fight against Pres. Joe Biden's climate agenda. Exxon has been spending a lot of money on ads, stating Biden's climate plans are a threat to energy jobs. Then there's Amazon, Apple, Disney, Google's Alphabet and Microsoft, who are paying lobbyists to either soften or oppose Biden's proposals, which are considered by leading Democrats as the most ambitious in the country's history. All this while these same companies say they are trying to implement sustainability goals, such as being carbon neutral by 2030. So what gives? Are these companies talking out of both sides of their collective mouths?
In this episode of DoWell podcast, Ankit talks with Sunil about his fascinating journey, how he started as a mining engineer and shifted focus to ocean and environmental governance, first as an academic and now with Ocean Governance, where he spends time educating individuals and corporates in Ocean and Environmental Governance. You can follow the podcast on twitter at @podcast_dowell, on Instagram at podcast.dowell or you can also email us at podcast.dowell@gmail.com. You can also follow the host Ankit at @ankitpsri
We need to become true guardians of natural resources, while ensuring well-being for people. Let us accept for a moment that we know exactly what we should do in order to transit into an environmentally and socially more just economy. One of the most interesting question that follows is who is going to take the first step? Policy-makers and corporate leaders often point to individuals as consumers to make the right choice, while individuals expect decision-makers to free up avenues to be more conscious citizens. However, these decisions are socially constructed, constrained and institutions significantly influence them. This episode's guest is Arild Vatn, who talks to Alexandra Köves about environmental governance.
这一期我们和友台不成气候合作,讨论中国的环境治理制度。我国国家主导的、自上而下的治理模式是否在应对环境危机、气候变化等挑战时尤为有效?它又存在哪些局限?在这一期与碳笑风生的串台节目中,我们尝试通过北方农村冬季清洁取暖这一具体政策,讨论我国环境治理模式的特点和利弊,并探讨环境治理的另一主体——公众可能发挥的作用。播客碳笑风生关注中国和全球的能源转型、气候变化和可持续发展问题,特别是中国实现碳达峰、碳中和的科学、技术、政策、政治、经济、社会和文化问题。【本期剧透】复习时间05:00 2013年以来空气污染治理的政策和成果回顾11:44 从污染物排放到大气空气质量,下一步是个体暴露与健康治理模式改革16:56 从“九龙治水”到“大部制”18:36 环保督察,让该负责的人负责案例研究:北方农村冬季清洁取暖22:32 散煤燃烧是北方冬季的主要污染源之一32:19 什么造成了2017年的“气荒”?35:12 是否有更公平的补贴方案?公众参与的不同形式45:59 环境信息公开,以公众环境研究中心和蔚蓝地图APP为例48:49 手把手教你举报环境污染56:53 从污染举报到环保督查 59:48 环境公益诉讼的进展与挑战展望1:14:56 美国和英国如何实行“煤改气”?1:24:26 对公众参与的期待:能否助推环境教育、促进环境公平1:32:20 不同的环境问题适用不同的治理模式?【延伸阅读】神 州 十 年 治 霾 史 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4Mzk2Njk3OQ==&mid=2655106266&idx=1&sn=75977344ac2570e57e3855bd1598fa51&chksm=845b79b6b32cf0a045d0b252f59b7990e0ef32c1715fd949fcecfad45cef2414a2cb6b9d6df6&scene=21#wechat_redirectShen, W., & Jiang, D. (2021). Making Authoritarian Environmentalism Accountable? Understanding China's New Reforms on Environmental Governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 30(1), 41-67. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1070496520961136 Zhao, B., Zheng, H., Wang, S., Smith, K. R., Lu, X., Aunan, K., ... & Hao, J. (2018). Change in household fuels dominates the decrease in PM2. 5 exposure and premature mortality in China in 2005–2015. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), 12401-12406. https://www.pnas.org/content/115/49/12401 Liu, J., Mauzerall, D. L., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Song, Y., Peng, W., ... & Zhu, T. (2016). Air pollutant emissions from Chinese households: A major and underappreciated ambient pollution source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7756-7761. https://www.pnas.org/content/113/28/7756 冉冉. (2015). 中国地方环境政治: 政策与执行之间的距离. 中央编译出版社. https://book.douban.com/subject/26389499/Greenstone, Michael and He, Guojun and Jia, Ruixue and Liu, Tong, Can Technology Solve the Principal-Agent Problem? Evidence from China's War on Air Pollution (June 29, 2020). University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2019-87, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3638591Karplus, Valerie J. and Wu, Mengying, Crackdowns in Hierarchies: Evidence from China's Environmental Inspections (September 4, 2019). MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5700-19, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3449177蔚蓝地图 https://www.ipe.org.cn/index.html12369网络举报平台网站 全国生态环境投诉举报平台 http://1.202.247.200/netreport/netreport/index中华人民共和国环境保护法http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2014-04/25/content_2666434.htm最高人民法院关于审理环境民事公益诉讼案件适用法律若干问题的解释http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-13025.html碳笑风生关注全球和中国的能源转型、气候变化和可持续发展问题,特别是中国实现碳达峰、碳中和的科学、技术、政策、政治、经济、社会和文化问题。大家可以在小宇宙播客、喜马拉雅、QQ音乐、Podcast等平台收听我们,我们同步更新的微信公众号“环境科学与政策”会有更多的专业讨论。大家也可以通过留言或在微信公众号“环境科学与政策”联系我们。结尾音乐来自The Podcast Host and Alitu: The Podcast Maker app.
这一期我们和友台不成气候合作,讨论中国的环境治理制度。我国国家主导的、自上而下的治理模式是否在应对环境危机、气候变化等挑战时尤为有效?它又存在哪些局限?在这一期与碳笑风生的串台节目中,我们尝试通过北方农村冬季清洁取暖这一具体政策,讨论我国环境治理模式的特点和利弊,并探讨环境治理的另一主体——公众可能发挥的作用。播客碳笑风生关注中国和全球的能源转型、气候变化和可持续发展问题,特别是中国实现碳达峰、碳中和的科学、技术、政策、政治、经济、社会和文化问题。【本期剧透】复习时间05:00 2013年以来空气污染治理的政策和成果回顾11:44 从污染物排放到大气空气质量,下一步是个体暴露与健康治理模式改革16:56 从“九龙治水”到“大部制”18:36 环保督察,让该负责的人负责案例研究:北方农村冬季清洁取暖22:32 散煤燃烧是北方冬季的主要污染源之一32:19 什么造成了2017年的“气荒”?35:12 是否有更公平的补贴方案?公众参与的不同形式45:59 环境信息公开,以公众环境研究中心和蔚蓝地图APP为例48:49 手把手教你举报环境污染56:53 从污染举报到环保督查 59:48 环境公益诉讼的进展与挑战展望1:14:56 美国和英国如何实行“煤改气”?1:24:26 对公众参与的期待:能否助推环境教育、促进环境公平1:32:20 不同的环境问题适用不同的治理模式?【延伸阅读】神 州 十 年 治 霾 史 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4Mzk2Njk3OQ==&mid=2655106266&idx=1&sn=75977344ac2570e57e3855bd1598fa51&chksm=845b79b6b32cf0a045d0b252f59b7990e0ef32c1715fd949fcecfad45cef2414a2cb6b9d6df6&scene=21#wechat_redirectShen, W., & Jiang, D. (2021). Making Authoritarian Environmentalism Accountable? Understanding China's New Reforms on Environmental Governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 30(1), 41-67. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1070496520961136 Zhao, B., Zheng, H., Wang, S., Smith, K. R., Lu, X., Aunan, K., ... & Hao, J. (2018). Change in household fuels dominates the decrease in PM2. 5 exposure and premature mortality in China in 2005–2015. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), 12401-12406. https://www.pnas.org/content/115/49/12401 Liu, J., Mauzerall, D. L., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Song, Y., Peng, W., ... & Zhu, T. (2016). Air pollutant emissions from Chinese households: A major and underappreciated ambient pollution source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7756-7761. https://www.pnas.org/content/113/28/7756 冉冉. (2015). 中国地方环境政治: 政策与执行之间的距离. 中央编译出版社. https://book.douban.com/subject/26389499/Greenstone, Michael and He, Guojun and Jia, Ruixue and Liu, Tong, Can Technology Solve the Principal-Agent Problem? Evidence from China's War on Air Pollution (June 29, 2020). University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2019-87, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3638591Karplus, Valerie J. and Wu, Mengying, Crackdowns in Hierarchies: Evidence from China's Environmental Inspections (September 4, 2019). MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5700-19, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3449177蔚蓝地图 https://www.ipe.org.cn/index.html12369网络举报平台网站 全国生态环境投诉举报平台 http://1.202.247.200/netreport/netreport/index中华人民共和国环境保护法http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2014-04/25/content_2666434.htm最高人民法院关于审理环境民事公益诉讼案件适用法律若干问题的解释http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-13025.html碳笑风生关注全球和中国的能源转型、气候变化和可持续发展问题,特别是中国实现碳达峰、碳中和的科学、技术、政策、政治、经济、社会和文化问题。大家可以在小宇宙播客、喜马拉雅、QQ音乐、Podcast等平台收听我们,我们同步更新的微信公众号“环境科学与政策”会有更多的专业讨论。大家也可以通过留言或在微信公众号“环境科学与政策”联系我们。结尾音乐来自The Podcast Host and Alitu: The Podcast Maker app.
这一期我们和友台不成气候合作,讨论中国的环境治理制度。我国国家主导的、自上而下的治理模式是否在应对环境危机、气候变化等挑战时尤为有效?它又存在哪些局限?在这一期与碳笑风生的串台节目中,我们尝试通过北方农村冬季清洁取暖这一具体政策,讨论我国环境治理模式的特点和利弊,并探讨环境治理的另一主体——公众可能发挥的作用。播客碳笑风生关注中国和全球的能源转型、气候变化和可持续发展问题,特别是中国实现碳达峰、碳中和的科学、技术、政策、政治、经济、社会和文化问题。【本期剧透】复习时间05:00 2013年以来空气污染治理的政策和成果回顾11:44 从污染物排放到大气空气质量,下一步是个体暴露与健康治理模式改革16:56 从“九龙治水”到“大部制”18:36 环保督察,让该负责的人负责案例研究:北方农村冬季清洁取暖22:32 散煤燃烧是北方冬季的主要污染源之一32:19 什么造成了2017年的“气荒”?35:12 是否有更公平的补贴方案?公众参与的不同形式45:59 环境信息公开,以公众环境研究中心和蔚蓝地图APP为例48:49 手把手教你举报环境污染56:53 从污染举报到环保督查 59:48 环境公益诉讼的进展与挑战展望1:14:56 美国和英国如何实行“煤改气”?1:24:26 对公众参与的期待:能否助推环境教育、促进环境公平1:32:20 不同的环境问题适用不同的治理模式?【延伸阅读】神 州 十 年 治 霾 史 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4Mzk2Njk3OQ==&mid=2655106266&idx=1&sn=75977344ac2570e57e3855bd1598fa51&chksm=845b79b6b32cf0a045d0b252f59b7990e0ef32c1715fd949fcecfad45cef2414a2cb6b9d6df6&scene=21#wechat_redirectShen, W., & Jiang, D. (2021). Making Authoritarian Environmentalism Accountable? Understanding China's New Reforms on Environmental Governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 30(1), 41-67. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1070496520961136 Zhao, B., Zheng, H., Wang, S., Smith, K. R., Lu, X., Aunan, K., ... & Hao, J. (2018). Change in household fuels dominates the decrease in PM2. 5 exposure and premature mortality in China in 2005–2015. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), 12401-12406. https://www.pnas.org/content/115/49/12401 Liu, J., Mauzerall, D. L., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Song, Y., Peng, W., ... & Zhu, T. (2016). Air pollutant emissions from Chinese households: A major and underappreciated ambient pollution source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7756-7761. https://www.pnas.org/content/113/28/7756 冉冉. (2015). 中国地方环境政治: 政策与执行之间的距离. 中央编译出版社. https://book.douban.com/subject/26389499/Greenstone, Michael and He, Guojun and Jia, Ruixue and Liu, Tong, Can Technology Solve the Principal-Agent Problem? Evidence from China's War on Air Pollution (June 29, 2020). University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2019-87, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3638591Karplus, Valerie J. and Wu, Mengying, Crackdowns in Hierarchies: Evidence from China's Environmental Inspections (September 4, 2019). MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5700-19, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3449177蔚蓝地图 https://www.ipe.org.cn/index.html12369网络举报平台网站 全国生态环境投诉举报平台 http://1.202.247.200/netreport/netreport/index中华人民共和国环境保护法http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2014-04/25/content_2666434.htm最高人民法院关于审理环境民事公益诉讼案件适用法律若干问题的解释http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-13025.html碳笑风生关注全球和中国的能源转型、气候变化和可持续发展问题,特别是中国实现碳达峰、碳中和的科学、技术、政策、政治、经济、社会和文化问题。大家可以在小宇宙播客、喜马拉雅、QQ音乐、Podcast等平台收听我们,我们同步更新的微信公众号“环境科学与政策”会有更多的专业讨论。大家也可以通过留言或在微信公众号“环境科学与政策”联系我们。结尾音乐来自The Podcast Host and Alitu: The Podcast Maker app.
在往期节目中,我们介绍过中国近年来在大气污染治理领域的治理取得的成果。这些成绩在国际上和学术界也引发了诸多关注和讨论:这种国家主导的、自上而下的治理模式是否在应对环境危机、气候变化等挑战时尤为有效?它又存在哪些局限? 在这一期与碳笑风生的串台节目中,我们尝试通过北方农村冬季清洁取暖这一具体政策,归纳我国环境治理模式的特点和利弊,并探讨环境治理的另一主体——公众可能发挥的作用。 播客碳笑风生关注中国和全球的能源转型、气候变化和可持续发展问题,特别是中国实现碳达峰、碳中和的科学、技术、政策、政治、经济、社会和文化问题。 【本期剧透】 复习时间 03:53 2013年以来空气污染治理的政策和成果回顾 10:37 从污染物排放到大气空气质量,下一步是个体暴露与健康 治理模式改革 15:49 从“九龙治水”到“大部制” 17:29 环保督察,让该负责的人负责 案例研究:北方农村冬季清洁取暖 21:25 散煤燃烧是北方冬季的主要污染源之一 31:12 什么造成了2017年的“气荒”? 34:05 是否有更公平的补贴方案? 公众参与的不同形式 44:52 环境信息公开,以公众环境研究中心和蔚蓝地图APP为例 47:42 手把手教你举报环境污染 55:46 从污染举报到环保督查 58:41 环境公益诉讼的进展与挑战 展望 1:13:49 美国和英国如何实行“煤改气”? 1:23:19 对公众参与的期待:能否助推环境教育、促进环境公平 1:32:20 不同的环境问题适用不同的治理模式? 【延伸阅读】 神 州 十 年 治 霾 史 Shen, W., & Jiang, D. (2021). Making Authoritarian Environmentalism Accountable? Understanding China's New Reforms on Environmental Governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 30(1), 41-67 Zhao, B., Zheng, H., Wang, S., Smith, K. R., Lu, X., Aunan, K., ... & Hao, J. (2018). Change in household fuels dominates the decrease in PM2. 5 exposure and premature mortality in China in 2005–2015. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), 12401-12406 Liu, J., Mauzerall, D. L., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Song, Y., Peng, W., ... & Zhu, T. (2016). Air pollutant emissions from Chinese households: A major and underappreciated ambient pollution source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7756-7761 冉冉. (2015). 中国地方环境政治: 政策与执行之间的距离. 中央编译出版社 Greenstone, Michael and He, Guojun and Jia, Ruixue and Liu, Tong, Can Technology Solve the Principal-Agent Problem? Evidence from China's War on Air Pollution (June 29, 2020). University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2019-87 Karplus, Valerie J. and Wu, Mengying, Crackdowns in Hierarchies: Evidence from China's Environmental Inspections (September 4, 2019). MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5700-19 蔚蓝地图 12369网络举报平台网站全国生态环境投诉举报平台 中华人民共和国环境保护法 最高人民法院关于审理环境民事公益诉讼案件适用法律若干问题的解释 《不成气候No Such Climate》是一档两只不成气候的“科研狗”记录和分享我们在大气科学领域的学习和思考的播客。 【收听方式】 欢迎通过苹果播客、小宇宙、Spotify、Pocket Casts等泛用型播客客户端订阅我们的节目。我们也会在喜马拉雅、网易云音乐、QQ音乐、荔枝等平台同步更新。 【联系我们】 新浪微博@不成气候NoSuchClimate nosuchclimate@gmail.com
Chinese President Xi Jinping has called on the international community to work together for a fair and reasonable system of global environmental governance.
Stefan Partelow speaks with Elke Kellner and Andreas Thiel on topics related to polycentricity, linked to the upcoming International Association for the Study of the Commons virtual conference on Polycentricity May 17-19, 2021. You can find more information about the conference and other IASC events on their website iasc-commons.org/. Polycentricity conference: https://2021polycentricity.iasc-commons.org/ Elke Kellner is a postdoctoral researcher at the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. https://www.wsl.ch/en/employees/kellner.html Andreas Thiel is a professor of International Agricultural Policy and Environmental Governance at the University of Kassel in Germany. https://www.uni-kassel.de/fb11agrar/fachgebiete-/-einrichtungen/internationale-agrarpolitik-und-umweltgovernance/team/prof-dr-andreas-thiel www.incommonpodcast.org
This week on Sustainability Now!, your host, Justin Mog, brings you the University of Louisville’s 2021 Grawemeyer Award Lecture on Global Environmental Governance, which was held virtually on April 13th. Ken Conca is the 2021 Grawemeyer Award winner for Ideas Improving World Order, and he spoke on his award winning ideas set forth in his book "An Unfinished Foundation: The United Nations and Global Environmental Governance." Learn more at http://grawemeyer.org/world-order/ The UN must rethink its approach to environmental problems. The United Nations can tackle global environmental challenges far more effectively by incorporating two overlooked parts of its mandate—human rights and peace—into its efforts. So says Ken Conca, an American University international relations professor. The U.N. has addressed environmental issues using legal and sustainable development approaches but also needs to pursue strategies linked to its role as a protector of human rights and peace. The organization should declare a safe and healthy environment to be a basic human right, give its Security Council a well-defined role in safeguarding the environment, make sure its environmental initiatives are conflict-sensitive and seek environmental peace-building opportunities. Conca is a member of the U.N. Environment Programme’s Expert Advisory Group on Conflict and Peace-building and founded the Environmental Peace-building Working Group in Washington. He was a reviewer for the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and served on a scientific steering committee for the International Human Dimensions Program on Global Environmental Change. He has twice won the International Studies Association’s award for best international environmental affairs book. As always, our feature is followed by your community action calendar for the week, so get your calendars out and get ready to take action for sustainability NOW! Sustainability Now! airs on Forward Radio, 106.5fm, WFMP-LP Louisville, every Monday at 6pm and repeats Tuesdays at 12am and 10am. Find us at http://forwardradio.org The music in this podcast is courtesy of the local band Appalatin and is used by permission. Explore their delightful music at http://appalatin.com
Brenna holds an Honours Bachelor of Arts degree in Geography and Environmental Governance from the University of Guelph and has been an ISA certified arborist for 6 years. She has been employed at LEAF (Local Enhancement & Appreciation of Forests) for over 7 years- currently working as a Residential Planting Programs Manager- and some of her past experiences include research in dendroclimatology and tree planting projects with the Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority. In her spare time, Brenna enjoys synchronized skating, travelling and hiking, and she is an aspiring landscape photographer.Websites and Links mentioned:Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park: https://www.nps.gov/seki/index.htmLEAF's website: https://www.yourleaf.org/LEAF Backyard Biodiversity Program: https://www.yourleaf.org/backyard-biodiversityLEAF Volunteer Opportunities: https://www.yourleaf.org/volunteerThank you so much to Brenna for sharing her time and knowledge with us!ELB: http://www.el4biodiversity.ca/ELB on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/el4biodiversityI recorded this episode on the Williams Treaty, signed in 1923 by 7 Anishnaabe First Nations. The closest community to me is the Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation. This region is the traditional territory of the Anishnaabe and Haudenosaunee peoples, which they shared peacefully under the Dish with One Spoon Wampum agreement. Today, it is still home to many First Nations, Metis, and Inuit peoples.Music by Scott Holmeshttps://freemusicarchive.org/music/Scott_Holmes
In this episode, Elise talks with Noah Toly, professor of Urban Studies and Politics & International Relations at Wheaton College. They discuss the urban and built environment’s capability of shaping our desires and relationships, the role that the tragic plays in global environmental governance, and the ways we might rethink vocation in an increasingly consumerist and product-driven world.
This episode is also available as a blog post: https://larryschweiger.wordpress.com/2020/03/14/despite-environmental-governance-to-the-contrary-clean-cars-are-our-future/
Welche Rolle können Reallabore bei der Erprobung nachhaltiger Entwicklungskonzepte spielen? Und wie lässt sich die Mehr-Ebenen-Perspektive (Multi-Level-Perspective) nutzen, um den Wandel durch Megatrends und Disruptionen zu verstehen? Das sind ein paar der Forschungsgebiete von Dr. Niko Schäpke. Im Gespräch mit "Die Obsolete Stadt"-Teammitglied Constantin Alexander erläutert der Assistant Professor am Lehrstuhl für Environmental Governance an der Universität Freiburg diese Konzepte transformativer Forschung. Mehr Infos unter diesem Link. Das Forschungsprojekt "Die Obsolete Stadt" wird von der Robert-Bosch-Stiftung gefördert. Foto: Niko Schäpke
Albert Weale is Emeritus Professor of Political Theory and Public Policy in the Department of Political Science, University College London, where he still teaches and researches. Earlier in his career he worked at the Universities of Newcastle, York, East Anglia and Essex. He stayed at Essex more than 17 years. His research and writing have concentrated on issues of political theory and public policy, especially health policy, environmental policy, the theory of justice and democratic theory. In addition to over one hundred papers and chapters, he has authored, co-authored or co-edited nineteen books. He has published widely on social values and health policy, editing Cost and Choice in Health Care for the King's Fund in 1988 and, as part of the KCL/UCL Social Values Group, has recent articles in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Journal of Health Organization and Managementand the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. In environmental policy, his works include The New Politics of Pollution (Manchester University Press, 1992) and with others Environmental Governance in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2000), as well as the edited Risk, Democratic Citizenship and Public Policy (Oxford University Press, 2002). His work on environmental policy led to research on the European Union more generally and in this field his published work includes, as sole author, Democratic Citizenship and the European Union (Manchester University Press, 2005), as co-author and as co-editor Citizenship, Democracy and Justice in the New Europe, with Percy Lehning (Routledge, 1997) and Political Theory and the European Union, with Michael Nentwich (Routledge, 1998). His latest book. Modern Social Contract Theory, was published by Oxford University Press in June 2020, and it is the first systematic study of the full range of those modern social contract theories that have been developed since 1950. The work follows from his previous book Democratic Justice and the Social Contract (Oxford University Press, 2013). In September 2018 he published The Will of the People: A Modern Myth (Polity Press), a response to the misplaced populism of the Conservative Party in the wake of the 2016 referendum and the global trend against the principles of constitutional democracy. He is a former co-editor of two books series, Issues in Political Theory (Macmillan) and Issues in Environmental Politics (Manchester University Press), as well as of the British Journal of Political Science. In 1998 he was elected a Fellow of the British Academy and between 2008 and 2012 was one of its Vice-Presidents with special responsibility for Public Policy. In 2013 he awarded a CBE for services to Political Science.
This episode, we are joined with Samantha Casey who works at the Sustainability Office at the University of Guelph. She is a recent graduate from the Environmental Governance program here at the university. She is a passionate advocate for climate change. She is also a co-founder of an organization that seeks to empower change in her community with youth powered solutions. Listen for great tips on how to get kids involved in waste reduction at home! **This episode was recorded prior to the COVID-19 pandemic** Here are links to resources recommended by Samantha in the episode: Sustainability Office at U of G: https://www.uoguelph.ca/campussustainability/ eMERGE: https://emergeguelph.ca/ Project Neutral: https://app.projectneutral.org/ Guelph Tool Library: https://guelphtoollibrary.org/ Rock What You've Got Cookbook: https://guelphfamilyhealthstudy.com/2019/09/19/rock-what-youve-got-recipes-for-reducing-food-waste/ Zero Waste Groceries: https://www.zerocery.ca/
Youth-led climate change NGO Malaysian Youth Delegation (MYD), are an organisation which focuses on building the capacity of Malaysian youths, to engage with climate policy. They are set to host the third annual Malaysian Local Conference of Youth (MYLCOY), hosted virtually over three weekends, which aims to take on pressing issues such as Climate Finance, Green Economy, and Green Jobs, Climate Policies and Governance and more. We find out how these youths are mobilising, to make their voices heard from Julian Theseira, the Project Manager of the virtual Malaysian Local Conference of Youth 2020 (MY LCOY 2020). Image Source: Heinreich Böll Stiftung Southeast Asia See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this episode Mirian Vilela guides us through the importance of sustainable development. She is originally from Brazil, but now she works in Costa Rica as the Executive Director of the Earth Charter International Secretariat and Earth Charter Center on Education for Sustainable Development. She is also a professor in the University for Peace teaching in the areas of Sustainable Development, Environmental Governance, and Education for Sustainable Development. Mirian discusses the Earth Charter document that articulates values and principles for a more sustainable, compassionate world, explaining the document's vision that inspires a global movement for a better world and social justice with ecological integrity. “I fell in love with the work of the Earth Charter because of the possibility to meet people from all regions of the world,” Mirian comments, highlighting the truly inclusive nature of the movement. She presents the Earth Charter Center on Education for Sustainable Development and shines a spotlight on, “the importance of education as a main driver for social transformation,” and the need to cultivate this thinking around global issues. She describes the courses for young leaders, educators and professionals to develop research in training between sustainability, values and education. Education is fundamental, and at its core we must have a base for contributing to the wellbeing of society. Mirian also discusses the relevance of individual actions and how they truly do generate an impact. She believes that the more knowledge we have, the more of a sense of responsibility to care for others and for the common good we should have. Aditionally, she talks about the Earth Charter's theme for this year "Turning consciousness into action” and comments on previous years. Applying this Earth Charter vision to the natural world, she suggests to move away from the anthropocentric overview to a more ecocentric view. This vision can also be applied in animals, to see things in a more horizontal way, not in domination of other living beings. In conclusion, she inspires us with messages about transformative education and shares some practical examples.Find out more about Mirian and the Earth Charter HERE.
Global environmental governance has witnessed a trend that non-state actors have played an increasingly important role in the past two decades. particularly in European countries and Northern America. A study by two researchers from Institute of Developing Economies in Japan argues that similar governance changes have been emerging in northeast Asian countries even though this type of development has been observed mostly in western countries.The study was recently published in The Pacific Review and entitled Embryonic Forms of Private Environmental Governance in Northeast Asia. Do the authors overstate the role of non-state actors in the region? What are the barriers to prevent non-state actors from playing more active role in the environmental challenges such as air & water pollution, climate change, energy transition and so on?In this episode of REEI Energy and Climate Podcast, REEI’s Mr. Ang Zhao will discuss about these issues with Dr. Kenji Otsuka, one of two authors.
What can Japan's decision to leave the International Whaling Commission in 2018 tell us about the state of international environmental politics, and how could the solution lie in increased localisation? --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Jay and I discuss various aspects that affect public participation in environmental governance in India and specifically Gujarat. Tame kyare pollution control board ne phone karine kaho chho ke amare tya hava (air) kharab chhe? Tame bija mate phone karyo chhe? Suggestions for future topics? Email us at gujaratipodcast@gmail.com Take care! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/gujaratipodcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/gujaratipodcast/support
My dearest friend Keyur joins me today to discuss the aspects that might shape the post-COVID environmental governance in Gujarat. Suggestions for a topic? Email us at gujaratipodcast@gmail.com Take care! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/gujaratipodcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/gujaratipodcast/support
This episode is part of a continuing series on the Global Conversations podcast, Environmental Governance Lab: in Conversation. In this episode, Anthony and Reginafinish their conversation with professor Cochrane, and turn their attention towards innovation in Canada’s oil and gas sector, the United States’ role in encouraging climate action in Canada, the “election about nothing,” and much more!
This episode is part of a continuing series on the Global Conversations podcast, Environmental Governance Lab: in Conversation.In this episode, Anthony and Regina get political with Christopher Cochrane to discuss the politicization of the climate issue, the relationship between political ideology and attitudes toward climate policy, Canada’s political climate following the recent election, and much more! Christopher is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto and the University of Toronto Scarborough. He is the author of Left and Right: The Small World of Political Ideas (MQUP, 2015) and co-author, with Kelly Blidook and Rand Dyck, of Canadian Politics: Critical Approaches (Nelson, 2016). His research interests are Canadian politics, ideology, party competition, and computational social science.
This episode is part of a continuing series on the Global Conversations podcast, EnvironmentalGovernance Lab: In Conversation. In this episode, Anthony and Regina sit down with Heather Millar to discuss her prospects for Canadian climate policy following the 2019 federal election. Heather is an SSHRC postdoctoral fellow at the Institute for Science, Society, and Policy at the University of Ottawa, and was previously a fellow with the Environmental Governance Lab at the Munk School.
Jeremy Pittman is an Assistant Professor in the School of Planning at the University of Waterloo, Canada. Jeremy holds a Ph.D. in Social and Ecological Sustainability from the University of Waterloo, and an M.Sc. in Geography from the University of Regina. His research focuses on environmental policy, governance and social-ecological connectivity in rangelands, coastal areas and small-scale fisheries. https://twitter.com/pittman17?lang=en https://uwaterloo.ca/planning/people-profiles/jeremy-pittman https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=eB55IYYAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao In the podcast we discuss his work on Canadian rangelands, small-scale fisheries in Uruguay, organizing different academic tasks, challenges with research ethics such as site selection, giving back to communities, knowledge grabbing, open-access publishing, co-authorship and how to pick a journal. We also discuss strategies for how to read academic articles and time management with kids.
LawPod coordinator Dr Rachel Killean talks to Dr Mary Dobbs (Queen's School of Law) and Dr Viviane Gravey (Queen's School of History, Anthropology, Philosophy and Politics, co-chair of Brexit & Environment) about their work on Brexit, environment and agriculture policy. The discussion covers a variety of issues – why is Brexit also an environmental matter, why the Northern Irish situation is most challenging, and how to engage with policy debates in a country ‘tired of expert's. To find out more: Read their report (co-authored with Dr Ciara Brennan & Attracta Ui Bhroin) on Environmental Governance after Brexit in Northern Ireland https://www.brexitenvironment.co.uk/policy-briefs/#nigov Read the House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee report on Agriculture to which they both participatedhttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmniaf/939/939.pdf
Somehow, against all odds (long lines at the bagel shop where I got breakfast before recording, a concerningly small amount of sleep, even for college students, and the first fifteen minutes of the interview not recording), we have a brand new episode for you about environmental governance, featuring Dr. Steven Wolf! After reading the New York Times article “Losing Earth: The Decade We Almost Stopped Climate Change” by Nathaniel Rich, Marta and I had one big overarching question: “Why haven’t we effectively responded to the science of climate change with policy?” Naturally, with a inquiry as big as that, we had to seek some help from experts in the subject. This led us to Professor Wolf, who teaches the Environmental Governance course here at Cornell. I was really excited to do this episode, not only because it is the concentration that I chose for my major, but also because it was interesting to expand upon some of the ideas that we had brought up in past episodes and apply them to new scenarios. As a side note, I got to ask Professor Wolf a question that was very similar to an essay question on my Environmental Governance final, which was a little humorous moment of poetic justice for me:) Anyways, we hope you enjoy, learn something new, and say hi to us on social media! “Losing Earth: The Decade We Almost Stopped Climate Change” can be found here: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/01/magazine/climate-change-losing-earth.html Confused about any fancy, academic words we used? Here’s a cheat-sheet with definitions that is updated weekly → https://docs.google.com/document/d/19568TJiPhtW_NeL5LvV_xbQC-riydNU1S_th4KlFMZI/edit Hey! Where can I find that recent IPCC report you guys talked about?: http://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf (this is the version for policy makers and is relatively short) Thank for listening and have a great week! Pam Wildstein --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Successful democratic environmental governance requires the development of robust systems of environmental rights--but not the intrinsic rights usually advocated by environmentalists, nor declarations per se of rights in constitutions, treaties, and judicial rulings (a limited conception that dominates the thinking of many legal scholars and rights activists). For truly democratic governance, rights must be a shorthand label for fundamental policies about what humans may, must, and may never do--policies that, by consensus, society has decided should lie beyond the reach of ordinary everyday democratic practice.
Guests John Howes, Roger Feldman, and George Crabtree discuss how laws related to the overall process of making, consuming, and disposing of consumer goods need to be shaped and coordinated in order to avoid unintended environmental consequences. Specifically, the panel talks about the rare earth metals that comprise a wide range of consumer electronics, and how sustainable policies need to be implemented by the corporate and legislative sectors. Our panelists include: Roger Feldman, OF Andrews Kurth Kenyon in Washington D.C., and chair of our Section's Infrastructure, Siting, and Reliability Committee Dr. George Crabtree, Director of the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research at Argonne National Laboratory and Distinguished Professor of Physics Electrical and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illinois in Chicago John Howes, Principal of the Redland Energy Group in Washington, DC To support our Section, or to join us, please visit our website at www.americanbar.org/environ
In this podcast, Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews attorney Ruth Nzioka who is a legal intern with the Institute for Institute for Law and Environmental Governance (ILEG) in Nairobi, Kenya. ILEG is an independent, non-profit public interest law and policy organization focused on promoting sustainable development. We work with local communities, governments, the private sector and civil society organizations (CSOs) to ensure fair, balanced and equitable development policy choices to improve peoples’ lives and protect the environment. Professor Dellinger spoke with Ms. Nzioka in Eugene, Oregon in early March about what she sees as pressing environmental issues in Kenya and the African continent in general. Ms. Nzioka has a particular interest in public participation in environmental law and talks about why she sees public participation as important to the future of environmental governance in Kenya.
Guest : Bo Kjellén and Maurice Strong June 3 2012 Twenty years after the watershed Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, later this month the “Rio +20” UN Conference on Sustainable Development will set the global environmental agenda for the years ahead. Ambassador Bo Kjellén played a key role in … more >>
Professor Stuart Chapin Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks gives the first lecture in the Environmental Governance and Resilience series.
Professor Carl Folke Director, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, gives the final talk in the Environmental Governance and Resilience series.
Professor Robert Costanza, Director, Institute for Sustainable Solutions, Portland State University, gives a talk for the Environmental Governance and Resilience series.
Professor Gísli Pálsson, Dept of Anthropology, University of Iceland, gives a talk for the Environmental Governance and Resilience series.
Professor Andy Pickering, University of Exeter, gives a talk for the Environmental Governance and Resilience series.
Professor Kathy Willis, Director, Biodiversity Institute gives a talk for the Environmental Governance and Resilience series.
Guest : Prof. Oran Young March 11 2012 The institutions and international regimes for governing environmental issues are crucial for sustainability, yet they vary widely in their effectiveness. This week, Think Globally Radio meets the world leading authority on global environmental governance, Prof. Oran Young, who shares his insights from … more >>
Institute of Historical Research Running the River Thames: oral history and the environmental governance of the Thames, 1960-2010 Vanessa Taylor (Greenwich) Metropolitan History seminar series
Cutting Through the Matrix with Alan Watt Podcast (.xml Format)
--{ Road to Hell Paved with Premeditated Intentions: "UN Declares from its Ivory Steeple, Copulation Produces Too Many People, Using Slogans, Statistics, Roll Past Our Eyes, Advocate Model State China, Abort, Sterilize, Yet Quietly for Years All This has been Done, Sterilizing the West, All the While 'Keeping Mum,' Using the Needle, the Food and Water Supply, Fluoride, Bisphenol-A, Phthalates, Sperm Die, Eugenics Agenda Must Be Stopped, No Further, Preponderance of Evidence, Verdict--Mass Murder" © Alan Watt }-- George Orwell, BBC Propaganda - Destruction of Normalcy, Force of Law - Christianity - Madam Blavatsky, Anne Besant - New Age, Science. Advertising, Exploitation, Behavioural Psychology - Skinner, Pavlov, Sadists - Funding by Foundations - Lord Bertrand Russell. Nonsense, Global Warming - Club of Rome, "The First Global Revolution" book, Uniting to Fight Common Enemy (Humanity Itself). Space Invasion, John Dewey, Ronald Reagan - Reuters, Routing Information. China, One-Child Policy, Birth Control, United Nations, Depopulation - Starvation, Wars, Farming - Lies, Statistics, Graphs, Malthus, Darwin. CO2 Emissions - Climate Debate - Stoic Philosophy of Ancient Greece - Collectivism - Eugenicists, Manageable Population Level, Abortions. Sperm Count Drop, Chemicals, Cosmetics, Infertility - UNESCO - Russell's "The Scientific Outlook" - BPA (Bisphenol-A), Synthetic Estrogen, Plastics. Inoculations, Sterilization, Crippling Diseases - Preponderance of Evidence Concludes Verdict - Deliberate Attack - Food Riots, Agri-Food Business. Inquisition, Conversions, Hallucinations, Ergot of Rye - Catholic Church - Biblical New Testament - Templars, Albigensians, Cathars, Perfecti, Scottish Rite. (Articles: ["China says one-child policy helps protect climate" Reuters (alertnet.org) - Aug. 30, 2007.] ["Reuters: China Promotes Abortion To Reduce CO2 - People Are Enemy #1" (wiseupjournal.com) - Nov. 26, 2008.] ["Environmental Governance and Institutions - CO2 Emissions: CO2 emissions per capita (source: IEA)" (earthtrends.wri.org).]) *Title/Poem and Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Nov. 26, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)