POPULARITY
234 episodes with research programs
85 episodes with research programs
12 episodes with research programs
5 episodes with research programs
3 episodes with research programs
4 episodes with research programs
2 episodes with research programs
4 episodes with research programs
3 episodes with research programs
Research shows that spirituality can benefit mental health and improve overall well-being. And it can play a meaningful role in helping people cope with life's challenges, like living with MS. This week, Dr. Mana Ali Carter, a rehabilitation psychologist at MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital in Washington D.C., joins me to discuss the positive effects that spirituality can have on the mind and body, and how it's been shown to make a difference for people living with MS. We're also sharing encouraging initial reports from a Phase 1 clinical trial for KYV-101, Kyverna's investigational CAR-T therapy for MS. We'll tell you about a positive report on two years of data from a Phase 2 clinical trial extension study for Frexalimab, a novel investigational disease-modifying therapy from Sanofi. We'll explain how the decision to discontinue federal matching funds for designated state health programs will have a direct impact on some people living with MS. And we'll tell you how you can register for the National MS Society's webinar in support of restoring federal funding for the MS Research Program. We have a lot to talk about! Are you ready for RealTalk MS??! This Week: How spirituality can make a difference if you're living with MS :22 Initial reports from a Phase 1 clinical trial for a CAR-T therapy are encouraging 1:15 Two years of data from a Phase 2 extension study of Frexalimab are positive 3:07 The federal government will no longer provide matching funds for designated state health programs 5:47 The National MS Society is hosting a virtual event to support restoring federal funding for the MS Research Program 8:38 Dr. Mana Ali Carter explains how spirituality can make a difference in your life if you're living with MS 11:27 Share this episode 30:40 Have you downloaded the free RealTalk MS app? 31:01 SHARE THIS EPISODE OF REALTALK MS Just copy this link & paste it into your text or email: https://realtalkms.com/399 ADD YOUR VOICE TO THE CONVERSATION I've always thought about the RealTalk MS podcast as a conversation. And this is your opportunity to join the conversation by sharing your feedback, questions, and suggestions for topics that we can discuss in future podcast episodes. Please shoot me an email or call the RealTalk MS Listener Hotline and share your thoughts! Email: jon@realtalkms.com Phone: (310) 526-2283 And don't forget to join us in the RealTalk MS Facebook group! LINKS If your podcast app doesn't allow you to click on these links, you'll find them in the show notes in the RealTalk MS app or at www.RealTalkMS.com Become an MS Activist Web: https://nationalmssociety.org/advocacy Email: msactivist@nmss.org Participate in a Sanofi Clinical Trial https://sanofistudies.com Register for a Virtual Event: Restore the MS Research Program https://nmss.quorum.us/event/23043 Join the RealTalk MS Facebook Group https://facebook.com/groups/realtalkms Download the RealTalk MS App for iOS Devices https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/realtalk-ms/id1436917200 Download the RealTalk MS App for Android Deviceshttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=tv.wizzard.android.realtalk Give RealTalk MS a rating and review http://www.realtalkms.com/review Follow RealTalk MS on Twitter, @RealTalkMS_jon, and subscribe to our newsletter at our website, RealTalkMS.com. RealTalk MS Episode 399 Guests: Dr. Mana Ali Carter Privacy Policy
Join us in this episode of the podcast where we host Lebanese students of diverse backgrounds discussing their match process after participating in the International Lebanese Medical Association Research Program. In this episode, we hosted students who have matched in internal medicine and general surgery and we discuss with them the ILMA Research Program application process and how the program helped them achieve their goal of matching into a residency program. #HealingHorizons #USMedicineMatch #ERAS #ResidencySuccess #MedicalJourney #ILMAUSA #MedSchoolToResidency #PhysicianStories
Dr. Russell Ramsay is a co-founder of the Penn Adult ADHD Treatment and Research Program, and served as professor of clinical psychology in the department of psychiatry of the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.He is author of many books on ADHD, his most recent book is Rethinking Adult ADHD: Helping Clients Turn Intentions into Actions (2020). In addition he has a popular blog on psychology today, rethinking adult ADHD. Find out more about Dr. Ramsay here - https://www.cbt4adhd.com/about/In today's episode we discuss, what it means to be diagnosed with ADHD, how patients should consider whether or not to take medication, how ADHD can be treated psychologically, how CBT should be adapted for ADHD, how people can improve their focus and much more. Interviewed by Dr. Alex Curmi. Dr. Alex is a consultant psychiatrist and a UKCP registered psychotherapist in-training.Alex's latest Guardian article: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/mar/31/the-big-idea-should-you-trust-your-gutTedX conference tickets: https://tedxlondonbusinessschool.co.uk/If you would like to invite Alex to speak at your organisation please email alexcurmitherapy@gmail.com with "Speaking Enquiry" in the subject line.Alex is not currently taking on new psychotherapy clients, if you are interested in working with Alex for focused behaviour change coaching , you can email - alexcurmitherapy@gmail.com with "Coaching" in the subject line.Give feedback here - thinkingmindpodcast@gmail.com - Follow us here: Twitter @thinkingmindpod Instagram @thinkingmindpodcast Tiktok - @thinking.mind.podcast
Russell Ramsay, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist and an Assistant Professor of Psychology in Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. He serves as the Associate Director of Penn's Adult ADHD Treatment and Research Program, with a particular expertise in psychosocial treatments for adults with ADHD. Russell is here to discuss the diagnosis of ADHD between adolescents and adults, while also discussing benefits of certain therapies amongst the age ranges.
Send us a textDr. Abdullahi Jawobah takes us deep into the critically overlooked world of maternal mental health, where his groundbreaking research reveals a staggering statistic: approximately 50% of pregnant and lactating mothers in Sierra Leone experience psychological distress. This silent epidemic has far-reaching consequences not only for mothers but for their unborn children, as Dr. Jawobah explains how stress hormones cross the placenta to affect gene expression in developing fetuses. Addressing this is a pathway to reducing stillbirths, preeclampsia, infant malnutrition, and physical health outcomes.The conversation illuminates how mothers in Sierra Leone express their psychological suffering through culturally specific language—describing their distress as "my heart is spoiled" or "my heart is crying"—rather than using Western terms like depression or anxiety. Dr. Jawobah shares the heartbreaking cultural context where women who undergo cesarean sections may be viewed as "not fit to be women" and mothers whose babies develop malnutrition might be accused of infidelity, creating significant barriers to seeking mental health support.What makes this episode particularly powerful is Dr. Jawobah's innovative solution: adapting Zimbabwe's "Friendship Bench" intervention for Sierra Leone. By training elderly women from existing mother-to-mother support groups to provide problem-solving therapy, his team created a culturally appropriate support system that produced "phenomenal" results. These elderly women, once feeling marginalized themselves, find new purpose in guiding younger mothers through their challenges, creating a beautiful intergenerational healing model. (Research)Abdulai Jawo Bah completed his PhD in Global Mental Health at Queen Margaret University in Scotland. He is an NIH Diversity Supplement Research Fellow and Research Associate at Boston College's Department of Research Program on Children and Adversity (RPCA), investigating transmission of trauma from former child soldiers to their offsprMaternal Health impacts child and family wellbeing, and is an indicator of societal wellbeing as well. If you want to support this work, please give to the HCW Maternal Health Mission - Maternal Health Matters! A new documentary on orphanage response - the right way! Travel on International Mission with Helping Children Worldwide to Sierra Leone, meet the local leadership and work alongside them. Exchange knowledge, learn from one another and be open to personal transformation. You can step into a 25 year long story of change for children in some of the poorest regions on Earth.https://www.helpingchildrenworldwide.org/mission-trips.htmlSupport the showHelpingchildrenworldwide.org
Allie is self-professed fan of insects, and the first vector biologist hired at the University of Maine. Her work focuses on medical entomology, vector-borne disease ecology, and epidemiology, and is a great example of how interdisciplinary teams of researchers can do comprehensive work that may actually seem like more than the sum of their parts. This conversation was recorded in January 2025. ~~~~~The Maine Science Podcast is a production of the Maine Discovery Museum. It is recorded at Discovery Studios, at the Maine Discovery Museum, in Bangor, ME. The Maine Science Podcast is hosted and executive produced by Kate Dickerson; edited and produced by Scott Loiselle. The Discover Maine theme was composed and performed by Nick Parker. To support our work: https://www.mainediscoverymuseum.org/donate. Find us online:Maine Discovery MuseumMaine Discovery Museum on social media: Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Bluesky Maine Science Festival on social media: Facebook Instagram LinkedInMaine Science Podcast on social media: Facebook Instagram © 2025 Maine Discovery Museum
Anorexia nervosa is a serious and complex mental health disorder marked by a distorted body image and an intense fear of weight gain. Often misunderstood, anorexia isn't about food or vanity – it stems from biological, psychological, and social factors and can affect anyone. What are the warning signs? And how can recovery be supported? We spoke with Kamryn Eddy, PhD, co-director of the Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program at Massachusetts General Hospital and associate professor of psychology at Harvard Medical School, about how to recognize the signs of anorexia, supporting loved ones, emerging treatments options, and the crucial role of hope in recovery.
Curt is a marine biologist for Ready Seafood, which supplies live and processed lobster products from the coast of Maine to retail, wholesale, and food service companies worldwide. Curt's research program at Ready Seafood focuses on improving the sustainability and quality of lobsters through research and collaborations with academic institutions and industry partners. Two quick notes for our listeners who don't live in Maine. DMR is the Department of Marine Resources. And when Curt mentions western Maine, that's Casco Bay, where Portland is located.This conversation was recorded in January 2025. ~~~~~The Maine Science Podcast is a production of the Maine Discovery Museum. It is recorded at Discovery Studios, at the Maine Discovery Museum, in Bangor, ME. The Maine Science Podcast is hosted and executive produced by Kate Dickerson; edited and produced by Scott Loiselle. The Discover Maine theme was composed and performed by Nick Parker. To support our work: https://www.mainediscoverymuseum.org/donate. Find us online:Maine Discovery MuseumMaine Discovery Museum on social media: Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Bluesky Maine Science Festival on social media: Facebook Instagram LinkedInMaine Science Podcast on social media: Facebook Instagram © 2025 Maine Discovery Museum
As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer breadth and depth of its proposed changes to American governance. This is not just a policy blueprint; it is a vision for a fundamentally different United States, one that aligns closely with conservative ideals and the legacy of the Trump administration.At its core, Project 2025 is a four-pillar initiative: a policy guide for the next Republican president, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project has drawn both intense scrutiny and fervent support, depending on one's political leanings[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its call for a radical restructuring of federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its responsibilities devolved to the states. This move is part of a broader push for school choice and parental control over education, reflecting a belief that education is a private rather than a public good. The federal government's role would be reduced to a mere statistics-keeping organization, with significant curtailment of civil rights enforcement in schools. The proposal explicitly rejects the pursuit of racial parity in school discipline, prioritizing student safety over equitable treatment[1].The Department of Homeland Security would also face significant changes, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This would be accompanied by a stringent immigration policy, including the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants and the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement. The project's authors argue that such measures are necessary to restore order and enforce the rule of law, but critics see these proposals as draconian and inhumane[1][2].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes substantial cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, while urging the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The plan also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. This stance is part of a broader effort to align healthcare policy with conservative moral values, a move that has sparked fierce opposition from reproductive rights advocates[1].The project's vision for science and research is equally transformative. It prioritizes fundamental research over applied science, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. Climate change research would be significantly curtailed, with the U.S. Global Change and Research Program facing critical analysis and potential dismantling. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be restricted from using certain climate change projections, and its scientific activities would require clear congressional authorization. These changes reflect a skepticism towards climate science and a preference for fossil fuels over renewable energy[4].Project 2025 also seeks to centralize executive power, advocating for the elimination of civil service protections and the placement of the entire federal bureaucracy under direct presidential control. This is based on the unitary executive theory, which argues for a more streamlined and efficient government. However, critics warn that this could lead to a dangerous concentration of power in the White House, undermining the independence of critical agencies like the Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission[1][2].The impact on civil rights is another area of significant concern. Project 2025 labels diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives as "managerialist left-wing race and gender ideology" that must be erased. It proposes banning funding for critical race theory, twisting civil rights laws to protect white men from employment discrimination, and shutting down federal DEIA offices. This approach has been condemned by civil rights groups, who see it as a rollback of hard-won protections for marginalized communities[5].As I navigated through the dense documentation of Project 2025, it became clear that this initiative is not just a set of policy proposals but a manifesto for a conservative revolution in American governance. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts encapsulates this vision when he says, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic."[1]Despite the fervor with which Project 2025 has been received by some conservatives, it has also drawn intense criticism. Democrats have linked the initiative to Trump's reelection campaign, despite his attempts to distance himself. In a statement, former President Biden accused Trump of lying about his connections to the project, saying it "should scare every single American."[3]As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Project 2025 stands as a critical point of contention. Its proposals, if implemented, would reshape the fabric of American governance, from education and healthcare to science and civil rights. Whether this vision will become a reality remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the debate over Project 2025 will continue to be a defining issue in the ongoing struggle for the future of America.In the coming months, as the election unfolds and new leadership takes the helm, the fate of Project 2025 will be decided. Will its ambitious plans for restructuring federal agencies and aligning policy with conservative principles become the blueprint for a new era in American governance? Only time will tell, but one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the implications are far-reaching. As the nation navigates this pivotal moment, the choices made will shape the course of American history for generations to come.
Ever wondered how hedge funds, mutual funds, and big institutions move billions in the markets—and why their strategies don't work for individual traders? In this episode of Trader's Mindchat, we dive deep into the game-changing insights that will help you trade smarter, not harder. Learn why mirroring the "big players" might be costing you profits and discover a streamlined approach for part-time traders to ride their coattails without the institutional baggage. Here's what you'll learn: Key Insights: How institutional strategies differ from personal trading and why their methods don't fit smaller accounts. The Edge of Simplicity: How focusing on price action and volume reveals hidden opportunities. Screening Like a Pro: Narrowing 10,000 stocks down to a handful of winners. Overcoming FOMO: Why missing trades isn't the problem—it's chasing too many. Practical Applications: Tips for finding stocks with explosive potential and leveraging tools like EGLE and CANSLIM for consistent success. Plus, explore why having multiple income streams supports sustainable trading and how to embrace the cyclical nature of markets to thrive year-round.
As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2023, outlines a radical transformation of American governance, touching on virtually every aspect of federal policy, from education and healthcare to technology and environmental regulation.At its core, Project 2025 is a manifesto for a conservative revolution, envisioning a federal government reshaped in the image of a strong, centralized executive branch. The project's architects argue that the current system of independent federal agencies undermines the democratic republic, and they propose placing the entire executive branch under direct presidential control. As Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts puts it, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic."[1]One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to dismantle and reconfigure several key federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. Education would be left to the states, with federal funding for low-income students, such as Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, allowed to expire. Instead, public funds would be channeled into school vouchers, even for private or religious schools, reflecting the project's belief that education is a private rather than a public good[1].The Department of Homeland Security would also face significant changes, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This move is part of a broader strategy to reshape national security and immigration policies, including the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants and the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes drastic cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and it urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The plan also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. This stance is part of a broader agenda to roll back reproductive rights and impose conservative moral values on healthcare policy[1].The project's vision for science and research is equally transformative. It prioritizes fundamental research over applied research, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. Climate change research would be significantly curtailed, with the U.S. Global Change and Research Program facing critical analysis and potential rejection of its assessments prepared under the Biden administration. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be restricted from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts, and its science activities would require clear congressional authorization[4].Project 2025 also targets the tech and media landscape, proposing significant reforms to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The plan includes increasing agency accountability, reducing wasteful spending, and promoting national security and economic prosperity. It suggests that Big Tech companies should contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills, to support the expansion of 5G and satellite connectivity. Additionally, the project advocates for revising Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, limiting social media's ability to moderate content and ban individuals from their platforms[3].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked intense debate. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, undermining the system of checks and balances that is foundational to American democracy. As one analysis notes, "Project 2025 would destroy the U.S. system of checks and balances and create an imperial presidency," giving the president almost unlimited power to implement policies without significant oversight[5].The project's stance on civil rights is particularly contentious. It rejects diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives as "managerialist left-wing race and gender ideology" and proposes banning funding for critical race theory. The Department of Justice and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission would be used to undermine protections for LGBTQ employees and to prosecute private employers that support DEIA in their workplaces[2].As I navigated the complex web of policies outlined in Project 2025, it became clear that this initiative is not just a collection of policy proposals but a coherent vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's backers see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as the "totalitarian cult" of the "Great Awokening," a term they use to describe the cultural and political shifts of recent years[3].Despite Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, many of its authors have close ties to his administration. The connection is evident in the overlap between Project 2025's recommendations and Trump's own policy agenda. For example, Trump has called for NPR funding to be rescinded, echoing Project 2025's criticism of public broadcasting as a "liberal disinformation machine"[3].As the 2025 presidential transition approaches, the potential implementation of Project 2025's policies looms large. The project's authors envision an "army of aligned, vetted, trained, and prepared" personnel ready to execute these reforms swiftly. If realized, these changes would mark a seismic shift in American governance, one that could redefine the balance of power between the executive branch and other institutions of government.In the coming months, as the political landscape continues to evolve, the fate of Project 2025 will remain a critical point of contention. Whether its proposals are adopted in whole or in part, one thing is certain: the initiative has already sparked a national conversation about the future of American democracy and the role of the federal government in shaping that future. As we move forward, it will be essential to closely monitor these developments and consider the profound implications they hold for the country's governance, civil rights, and societal values.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a comprehensive vision for a radical restructuring of the American government and its agencies.Project 2025, published in April 2022, is the brainchild of former Trump administration officials, including Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, who have woven together a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership." This document outlines a sweeping overhaul of the federal government, touching on nearly every aspect of American life, from economic policies and social programs to science agencies and environmental regulations.One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambition to reshape the very fabric of federal agencies. For instance, the project proposes dismantling the Department of Education, transferring its programs or terminating them altogether, in favor of promoting school choice and increasing parental control over schools[1][3][4].The Department of Homeland Security is another target, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This move is part of a broader strategy to redefine immigration policies, aligning with the project's stance that "men and women are biological realities and married men and women are the ideal, natural family"[3].Economic reforms are a significant component of Project 2025. The plan criticizes the Federal Reserve, blaming it for the business cycle, and suggests abolishing it in favor of a commodity-backed currency, such as the gold standard. It also recommends simplifying individual income taxes to two flat tax rates: 15% on incomes up to the Social Security Wage Base and 30% above that. However, this proposal is likely to increase taxes for millions of low- and middle-income households[1].The project's approach to science policy is equally transformative. It prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current Department of Energy programs act as subsidies to the private sector. The plan proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change programs, and reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program to critically analyze and potentially refuse any assessments prepared under the Biden administration[2].Climate change research is a particular target, with Project 2025 describing the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) as "one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry." The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also in the crosshairs, with proposals to prevent the agency from using "unrealistic" climate change impact projections and to require clear congressional authorization for any science activity[2].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025 seeks significant changes. The plan calls for cutting Medicare and Medicaid, and urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. It also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills[1].The project's vision for the workforce is marked by a push for more stringent work requirements. For example, it proposes legislation requiring Americans to be paid more for working on Sundays and institutes work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which issues food stamps. Additionally, changes to overtime rules could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers[1].The influence of Project 2025 extends beyond policy proposals; it also envisions a structural overhaul of the federal bureaucracy. The project advocates for the "unitary executive" theory, which would place the entire federal bureaucracy under the direct control of the president, eliminating civil service protections for thousands of government employees. This move would allow these positions to be filled by political appointees beholden to the executive[3].Despite attempts by Donald Trump to distance himself from Project 2025, the connections between the two are undeniable. The project's senior advisor, John McEntee, has stated that they and the Trump campaign planned to "integrate a lot of our work"[1]. Russell Vought, founder of the Center for Renewing America (CRA), which is on Project 2025's advisory board, has been named policy director of the Republican National Committee platform committee. Vought has acknowledged that Trump has "blessed" the CRA's efforts and is "very supportive of what we do"[1].As we look ahead, the implications of Project 2025 are profound. If implemented, these policies could fundamentally alter the balance of power within the federal government, reshape the social and economic landscape, and have far-reaching consequences for environmental and healthcare policies.In the words of Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, the goal is to "institutionalize Trumpism." However, critics argue that many of these proposals are not only radical but also potentially unconstitutional. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has warned that Project 2025 threatens to erode democracy and has called for action to fight against its implementation[5].As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Project 2025 stands as a critical blueprint that could shape the future of American governance. Whether these proposals will become reality remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the potential impact on American society is immense. As we navigate these uncertain times, it is crucial to remain vigilant and informed about the policies that could redefine our nation's trajectory.
Dr. Denise Heard, vice president of Research Programs at the U.S. Poultry & Egg Association, updates recent results from research partially funded by the organization known primarily as USPOULTRY. She also outlines how the process works regarding the research support arms of the association and its USPOULTRY Foundation. Dr. Heard provides a sneak peek into the upcoming 2025 International Production & Processing Expo (IPPE), the annual poultry industry gathering scheduled for Atlanta in late January 2025. USPOULTRY is a major sponsor of the gathering that offers attendees the opportunity to attend more than 80 educational, college student and career program sessions and networking events throughout the three-day trade show.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This is not just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of American governance, tailored for the next Republican president, with many eyes on Donald Trump should he win the presidential election.At its core, Project 2025 is built around four pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel for the next administration, a training program dubbed the "Presidential Administration Academy," and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project has drawn significant attention and criticism for its ties to Trump's past policies and current campaign promises[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the federal government's structure and function. The project proposes dismantling several key departments, including the Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished to facilitate school choice and increase parental control over schools, with federal programs and standards devolving to the states. This move would also see the elimination of programs like Head Start, which serves over 833,000 children living in poverty, and the federal fund for low-income students under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965[1][2].The project's approach to education is emblematic of its broader philosophy: education is viewed as a private rather than a public good. This is reflected in proposals to make public funds available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools, and cuts to funding for free school meals. The critique of "woke propaganda" in public schools further underscores the project's commitment to conservative principles in education[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 suggests significant changes, including cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and the explicit rejection of abortion as healthcare. The plan also urges the government to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and to use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. These proposals align with the project's stance on social issues, such as declaring that "men and women are biological realities and married men and women are the ideal, natural family"[1][2].The project's energy and climate policies are equally contentious. It advocates for reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, repealing the Inflation Reduction Act, and closing offices focused on clean energy and climate change mitigation. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, despite concerns about methane leaks. The project also proposes relaxing restrictions on oil drilling and preventing states from adopting stricter regulations on vehicular emissions[1][4].The impact on science agencies is profound. Project 2025 recommends prioritizing fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. It proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change, and reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program to align with conservative principles. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities heavily curtailed. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be subject to closer oversight by political appointees, with a focus on managerial skills over scientific qualifications[4].The project's approach to labor and employment is also noteworthy. It suggests eliminating civil service protections for thousands of government employees, allowing them to be replaced by political appointees. This "unitary executive" theory aims to streamline decision-making but raises concerns about the politicization of the federal bureaucracy. Additionally, the project proposes changes to overtime rules that could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers, and introduces work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)[1][2].Expert analyses highlight the inconsistencies and potential implications of these proposals. Darrell West argues that the inconsistencies are designed for fundraising from certain industries or donors that would benefit. The project's emphasis on political appointees over merit-based staffing and its push for deregulation in key sectors have raised alarms about the potential for increased corruption and decreased public oversight[1].As I reflect on the breadth of Project 2025's proposals, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a fundamental shift in how the federal government operates and the values it upholds. The project's backers see it as a necessary correction to what they perceive as a bloated, inefficient, and overly liberal bureaucracy. Critics, however, view it as a dangerous erosion of public services, environmental protections, and social safety nets.Looking forward, the implementation of Project 2025's policies hinges on the outcome of the next presidential election. If a Republican president aligned with these proposals takes office, the first 180 days will be crucial in setting the tone for the administration. The project's playbook outlines a series of swift actions designed to reshape the government according to its vision. Whether this vision aligns with the broader interests of the American public remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Project 2025 is a blueprint for a significantly different America.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and ambition of its proposals. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2022, outlines a radical restructuring of the federal government, aligning it with a staunchly conservative agenda. Despite President Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, the connections between Project 2025 and his campaign are undeniable.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive plan to reshape American governance, touching on nearly every aspect of federal policy. One of the most striking aspects is its vision for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The project proposes politicizing these agencies, empowering the president to use them to target political opponents and enforce a radical agenda. As the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) notes, this could lead to a significant erosion of civil liberties and the rule of law[5].The project's authors also envision drastic changes to various federal agencies. For instance, they recommend dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and abolishing the Department of Education (ED), transferring or terminating its programs. The Department of Commerce would see significant alterations as well, with the Economic Development Administration (EDA) either abolished or repurposed to assist "rural communities destroyed by the Biden administration's attack on domestic energy production"[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 is equally transformative. It suggests focusing the Department of Energy on fundamental research, rather than technology development and climate change programs. The report argues that many current DOE programs act as subsidies to the private sector for government-favored resources, and proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology and climate change. This shift is part of a broader strategy to roll back climate science initiatives, including reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program and preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts[2].The EPA itself would undergo significant changes, with its research activities subject to closer oversight by political appointees rather than scientists. The project proposes that EPA grants be managed by political appointees and that the public be incentivized to scrutinize the agency's scientific conduct. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, has suggested that the EPA support increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the potential for increased methane leaks[1].Project 2025 also targets the National Institutes of Health (NIH), aiming to make it less independent and stopping its funding for research involving embryonic stem cells. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities severely curtailed. Thomas Gilman, who served under Trump as the chief financial officer of the Commerce Department, describes NOAA as "one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry"[2].The project's economic policies are just as far-reaching. It proposes instituting tax cuts, though there is disagreement among its writers on the issue of protectionism. Medicare and Medicaid would face significant cuts, and the government would be urged to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The project also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills[1].In the area of labor and employment, Project 2025 recommends instituting work requirements for those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and weakening overtime protections. It also suggests legislation requiring Americans to be paid more for working on Sundays, based on the premise that "God ordained the Sabbath as a day of rest"[1].The implications of these proposals are profound. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, compromising the checks and balances of the U.S. system of government. The plan involves purging the civil service, firing independent agency leaders, and conditioning federal funding on political fealty. This could lead to a situation where thousands of political operatives, hand-picked for their loyalty to the president, control key government positions regardless of their qualifications or commitment to constitutional duty[3].The project's approach to technology and media policies is equally concerning. It proposes increasing agency accountability at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) while decreasing wasteful spending and promoting national security and economic prosperity. However, it also suggests that Big Tech companies should fund the Universal Service Fund, currently supported through telephone bills, and that media ownership regulations are outdated and stifle competition[4].As I reflect on the scope of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy blueprint but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's authors and supporters see it as a way to "institutionalize Trumpism," as Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has described it. However, critics like the ACLU warn that it threatens to erode democracy, perpetuate bigotry, and undermine justice and equality[5].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals hinges on several key milestones. The upcoming presidential term will be crucial, as the project's success depends on a conservative administration willing to enact its recommendations. With Russell Vought, the founder of the Center for Renewing America, now serving as the policy director of the Republican National Committee platform committee, and given the ongoing connections between Project 2025 and the Trump campaign, the stage is set for a potentially transformative period in American governance[1].As the nation approaches these critical decision points, it is imperative to engage in a thorough and informed discussion about the implications of Project 2025. Whether one views this initiative as a necessary correction to current policies or a dangerous erosion of democratic principles, its impact on American life will be profound. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is crucial to remain vigilant and ensure that any changes to our governance system are made with the utmost care and a deep respect for the principles of democracy.
As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, I found myself navigating a complex web of proposals that promise to reshape the very fabric of American governance. This 900-page blueprint, crafted by over 400 conservative scholars, is more than just a policy guide; it is a vision for a fundamentally different federal government.At its core, Project 2025 is designed to provide a incoming Republican administration with a detailed roadmap for its first four years in office. The project is led by former Trump administration officials, including Paul Dans, who served as chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management, and Spencer Chretien, a former special assistant to President Trump. Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, the connections run deep, with many authors having served in his first administration or working within his inner circle[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its sweeping overhaul of federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. This move aligns with long-held conservative critiques of federal intervention in education, advocating instead for greater support for school choice[5].The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), established in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, would also face significant changes. Project 2025 proposes dismantling DHS and reorganizing its components under other departments or into a new, standalone border and immigration agency. This agency would be staffed by over 100,000 employees, reflecting a hardened stance on immigration enforcement and border security[5].Environmental and climate policies are another area where Project 2025 seeks radical change. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be transformed to prioritize managerial skills over scientific expertise in its staffing. The project suggests preventing the EPA from using "unrealistic" climate change impact projections and requiring clear congressional authorization for any science activity. This includes a proposal to close the EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, and to relax regulations on the fossil fuel industry, such as removing restrictions on oil drilling imposed by the Bureau of Land Management[1][2].The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is also in the crosshairs, with Project 2025 describing it as a "main driver of the climate change alarm industry" that is "harmful to future U.S. prosperity." The proposal includes breaking up NOAA and downsizing its operations, reflecting a broader skepticism towards climate change research and policy[5].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 prioritizes fundamental research over applied technology development. The Department of Energy would focus on research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct, eliminating many programs focused on energy technology and climate change. The U.S. Global Change and Research Program, which coordinates climate change research across agencies, would be reshaped to critically analyze and potentially reject assessments prepared under the Biden administration[2].The project also outlines significant changes to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), proposing to make it less independent and stopping its funding for research involving embryonic stem cells. This move aligns with conservative positions on ethical issues in medical research[1].Economic policies are another key area of focus. Project 2025 advocates for tax cuts, though its authors are split on the issue of protectionism. The plan includes cutting Medicare and Medicaid, and instituting work requirements for those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Additionally, it proposes changes to overtime rules that could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers[1].The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) would see increased accountability and reduced wasteful spending, with a focus on promoting national security and economic prosperity. The project suggests expanding 5G and satellite connectivity, such as StarLink, to reduce the digital divide and ensure every American has access to high-speed internet. Big Tech companies would be expected to contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills[4].Project 2025's vision extends to social issues as well. The agenda calls for the Food and Drug Administration to reverse its approval of the abortion pill mifepristone and to reinstate more stringent rules for its use. It also proposes using the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills, reflecting a strong stance against abortion and reproductive rights[5].Critics have labeled Project 2025 as a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, citing its extensive plans to dismantle the bureaucracy of the "Administrative State" and bring independent agencies under White House control. Darrell West of the Brookings Institution argues that the inconsistencies in the plan are designed to appeal to specific industries or donors that would benefit from the proposed changes[1].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a seismic shift in how the federal government operates. The project's authors envision a government that is more aligned with conservative principles, less involved in social and environmental issues, and more focused on economic growth and national security.The coming months will be crucial as the project's recommendations begin to take shape. With the transition to a new administration on the horizon, the implementation of these policies will depend on a complex interplay between the executive branch, Congress, and the judiciary. As Paul Dans, the outgoing director of Project 2025, noted, the project does not speak for any candidate or campaign, but its influence on the next conservative president's agenda is undeniable[1].As the nation prepares for these potential changes, one thing is certain: Project 2025 is not just a policy document but a roadmap for a fundamentally different America. Whether its vision aligns with the values and needs of the American people remains to be seen, but one thing is clear – the impact of Project 2025 will be felt for years to come.
As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and trepidation. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2022, outlines a radical restructuring of the federal government, envisioning a future that is as ambitious as it is contentious.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive policy agenda designed to guide a potential conservative administration, with ties that run deep into the circles of former President Donald Trump. Despite Trump's public disavowal of the project, the connections are undeniable; many of its authors and contributors are veterans of Trump's first administration or closely aligned with his inner circle[3][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to overhaul various federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Homeland Security would be dismantled, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be made less independent, with a specific ban on funding research involving embryonic stem cells[1].The project also targets environmental and climate change regulations, advocating for a significant rollback to favor fossil fuels. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should support increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the potential for increased methane leaks[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current Department of Energy (DOE) programs act as subsidies to the private sector. It proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change programs, and reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program to critically analyze and potentially refuse any assessments prepared under the Biden administration[2].The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is another agency in the crosshairs, with Project 2025 describing it as a "main driver of the climate change alarm industry" and proposing its breakup. The EPA would be restricted from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts and would require clear congressional authorization for any science activity[2].The project's vision extends to the economy and labor policies as well. It recommends instituting work requirements for those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and proposes changes to overtime rules that could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers. Additionally, it suggests legislation requiring higher pay for working on Sundays, based on the principle that "God ordained the Sabbath as a day of rest"[1].In the technology and media sector, Project 2025 is keen on addressing what it perceives as the threats posed by Big Tech. The authors argue that business concentration should no longer be considered solely in economic terms but also in socio-political terms, suggesting that antitrust laws should be applied more rigorously to prevent what they see as a "leftist" agenda. The project also emphasizes the need to subvert China's goal of becoming the global leader in artificial intelligence (AI) by investing in and protecting American innovation[3].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked significant debate. Critics, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), view Project 2025 as a blueprint for an "autocratic takeover," threatening to erode democracy and undermine various rights, including abortion and reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, immigrants' rights, and racial equity[4].Darrell West, an expert in the field, points out the inconsistencies in the plan, suggesting they are designed to attract funding from certain industries or donors that would benefit from the proposed changes. This raises questions about the true motivations behind the project and whether it serves a broader conservative agenda or specific corporate interests[1].As the 2024 elections have concluded, the connections between Project 2025 and the Trump campaign have become more apparent. Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself, the involvement of key figures like John McEntee and Russell Vought, who have transitioned between roles in the Trump administration and Project 2025, underscores the deep ties between the two[1][4].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's recommendations would depend on the next conservative president's willingness to adopt these sweeping changes. With Kevin Roberts, who previously worked on Trump's transition team, now leading the project, the stage is set for a potentially transformative period in American governance.As we approach 2025, the fate of Project 2025 hangs in the balance. Will its ambitious and sometimes controversial proposals reshape the federal government, or will they face significant resistance from Congress, civil society, and the courts? One thing is certain: the next few years will be pivotal in determining the future of American governance and the extent to which Project 2025's vision becomes a reality.
The ENLACE Summer Research Experience at UC San Diego connects high school and college students from the U.S. and Mexico in hands-on lab work with real research impact. Led by Dr. Olivia Graeve, the program offers a chance to explore new fields, gain lab skills, and prepare for grad school, while building cross-border friendships and collaboration in STEM. Series: "Education Channel" [Show ID: 38306]
The ENLACE Summer Research Experience at UC San Diego connects high school and college students from the U.S. and Mexico in hands-on lab work with real research impact. Led by Dr. Olivia Graeve, the program offers a chance to explore new fields, gain lab skills, and prepare for grad school, while building cross-border friendships and collaboration in STEM. Series: "Education Channel" [Show ID: 38306]
The ENLACE Summer Research Experience at UC San Diego connects high school and college students from the U.S. and Mexico in hands-on lab work with real research impact. Led by Dr. Olivia Graeve, the program offers a chance to explore new fields, gain lab skills, and prepare for grad school, while building cross-border friendships and collaboration in STEM. Series: "Education Channel" [Show ID: 38306]
The ENLACE Summer Research Experience at UC San Diego connects high school and college students from the U.S. and Mexico in hands-on lab work with real research impact. Led by Dr. Olivia Graeve, the program offers a chance to explore new fields, gain lab skills, and prepare for grad school, while building cross-border friendships and collaboration in STEM. Series: "Education Channel" [Show ID: 38306]
The National Institute of Health's All of Us Research Program is a federally-funded program on a mission to collect health data from one million or more diverse individuals across the U.S. over the course of many years, with the goal of improving precision medicine for us and future generations. The program has partner sites across the nation, as well as a mobile tour, which recently made a stop in Indianapolis.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Join Dianne A. Allen on "Someone Gets Me" as she sits down with Dr. Jose Abisambra, Associate Professor at the University of Florida's Department of Neuroscience. In this conversation, Dr. Abisambra shares his insights on creating an inclusive and supportive environment for neurodiverse individuals in academia and research. He discusses the importance of authenticity and understanding in mentoring relationships, and how he approaches leading a team with diverse strengths and challenges. Discussion: The importance of creating a welcoming environment for neurodiverse individuals in academia and research Dr. Abisambra's approach to mentoring and leading a team with diverse strengths and challenges The value of authenticity and understanding in building strong relationships with mentees Strategies for fostering inclusivity and promoting the success of neurodiverse individuals in STEM fields How leaders can create opportunities for growth and development for team members with different learning styles and abilities Dr. Jose Abisambra holds the following positions in Neuroscience Research at the University of Florida in Gainesville. Dr. Abisambra completed his PhD (2010) and postdoctoral training (2013) at the University of South Florida's Byrd Alzheimer's Institute and Research Center. Dr. Abisambra currently holds the following positions at the University of Florida: Associate Director, Research Programs, McKnight Brain Institute: Develop and steer strategic pilot programs that benefit the neuroscience community. Deputy Director, Brain Injury, Rehabilitation, and Neuroresilience (BRAIN) Center: Assist the Director leading BRAIN Center objectives, including research and outreach. Vice-Chair of Strategy, Dept. of Neuroscience: Coordinate the implementation of strategic plan objectives with other Vice-Chairs. Associate Professor: Maintain an extramurally funded program with research opportunities for trainees. Co-Editor-in-Chief, Brain Research, Elsevier. Manage various aspects of the journal, including communication with the publisher, senior editors, reviewers, and handling issues of scientific misconduct. Dr. Abisambra's research program focuses on identifying maladaptive mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD), AD-related disorders, and traumatic brain injury. We aim to elucidate the molecular mechanisms linking tau protein alterations with cellular dysfunction. Dr. Abisambra is a leader in his field while mentoring others. His leadership experience emphasizes strategic planning, execution, and accountability. Key examples include managing pilot programs for MBI and BRAIN Center, team building, coordinating departmental reports, leading faculty search committees, executing BRAIN Center strategic plans, and facilitating communication across university leadership levels. To learn more about Dr. Abisambra, please visit his website: www.abisambralab.com and let him know you heard him here on Someone Gets Me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- How to Connect with Dianne A. Allen You have a vision inside to create something bigger than you. What you need is a community and a mentor. The 6-month Visionary Leader Program will move you forward. You will grow, transform and connect. https://msdianneallen.com/ Join our Facebook Group Someone Gets Me Follow Dianne's Facebook Page: Dianne A. Allen Email contact: dianne@visionsapplied.com Dianne's Mentoring Services: msdianneallen.com Website: www.visionsapplied.com Be sure to take a second and subscribe to the show and share it with anyone you think will benefit. Until next time, remember the world needs your special gift, so let your light shine!
Vanessa Parli, Director of Research Programs at Stanford's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI), speaks with Allison Cohen, Senior Applied AI Project Manager at Mila. This episode was recorded for both the Humanitarian AI Today podcast and The World We Are Building podcast, which seek to broaden the conversation around artificial intelligence. Vanessa and Allison discuss how HAI reviews and selects AI research projects to support based on their technical soundness, potential impact, ethical considerations, and alignment with HAI's goals and values. Vanessa emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, which fosters a holistic approach to AI development. She also discusses the role of ethics in AI development and the challenges of bridging the gap between cutting-edge research and real-world applications, highlighting the importance of considering the potential impact of AI on society. This interview was recorded to provide humanitarian organizations, grantmakers and others with insights into how leading AI institutes handle research project cultivation and evaluation.
Scott Bennett is the Program Director for the Marine Biologic Lab's Striped Bass Magic research program and the MBL's Marine Resources Department manager. He grew up in Chicago fishing in freshwater lakes. As a teenager, he started coming to Cape Cod during the summers, where he developed a love for saltwater fishing. He earned a BA in Marine Biology from Roger Williams University in 2005 and a Master's Degree in Comparative Physiology focusing on cranial endothermy in tunas from Cal State Fullerton in 2013. Prior to graduate school, he spent several years at the American Museum of Natural History in the Department of Ichthyology, assisting with research on understanding the evolutionary relationships between various species of fish. Marine Biologic Lab's Striped Bass Magic research program is doing great work to better understand the biology and movements of striped bass. They conduct their ongoing research in an eel pond which is home to a seasonally resident striped bass population, some of which have returned to this same pond for multiple years in a row. the longitudinal data they have collected has been very beneficial to understanding striped bass biology and movements. If you want to learn more about their research, check out the Striped Bass Magic website The discussion covers a range of topics including the behavior, migration, and habits of striped bass in various environments. Bennett elaborates on the research methodologies used, including PIT and acoustic telemetry tags, and their findings, such as the correlation between striped bass movements and barometric pressure. The conversation also delves into the application of AI in fish identification and a collaborative research project with the Wampanoag tribe at Squibnocket. Jenkins and Bennett reflect on how this extensive research can influence recreational fishing practices. 00:36 Meet Today's Guest: Marine Biologist Scott Bennett 02:37 The Striped Bass Magic Research Program 05:03 Tagging Techniques and Tools 08:04 Behavioral Patterns and Circadian Rhythms 24:26 Individual vs. Group Behavior 29:56 Investigating Striped Bass Migrations 31:06 Experiments with Fingerlings and Iron Deposits 32:48 Adult Fish and Electromagnetic Field Experiments 33:45 Tagging and Tracking Striped Bass 38:48 AI in Fish Identification 45:10 Collaborative Research with Squibnocket Native American Tribe 52:33 Concluding Thoughts and Future Research
U.S. Special Forces Command Small Business Innovation Research Program; it's unique among efforts around the government. Congress gave SOCOM a special authority back in 2021 to do business to business transitions through the Softworks organization. For more about how SOCOM is using this authority to meet service member needs more quickly, Federal News Network's Executive Editor Jason Miller spoke with Director of Science and Technology for Special Operations Forces, Lisa Sanders. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This may be your best chance to help shape the future of healthcare! Learn how to enroll in All of Us Research and hear what your input could mean for future research. https://allofus.nih.gov Visit our website, www.kansashealthsystem.com or findadoctor.kansashealthsystem.com.
With everyone talking about ADHD, I thought it best to sit down with an expert and understand what exactly is ADHD. What it's like living with ADHD and what we can do if we have people around us have ADHD. If you have it, have a family member or friend with ADHD or perhaps work with someone with ADHD then you need to listen to this episode. J. Russell Ramsay, PhD, ABPP is a licensed psychologist specializing in the assessment and psychosocial treatment of adult ADHD. Before retiring from the University of Pennsylvania in 2023 to start his independent, virtual psychology practice, he was professor of clinical psychology and co-founder and clinical director of PENN's Adult ADHD Treatment & Research Program. He has served terms on the professional advisory boards of several ADHD organizations and is on the editorial board of the Journal of Attention Disorders. He has lectured internationally and is widely published, including six books on adult ADHD. His most recent book is The Adult ADHD & Anxiety Workbook in 2024. His patient guidebook, The Adult ADHD Tool Kit has been translated into Spanish, French, Korean; German and Chinese translations are in process; The Tool Kit is a recommended self-help book by the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies. Dr. Ramsay is a CHADD Hall of Fame inductee. Follow Russell: www.cbt4adhd.com Twitter/X: @cbt4adhd Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/russell.ramsay.1/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/russell-ramsay-a8bbb310/ Instagram: cbt4adhd Follow the podcast https://mtr.bio/onemomentpleasepodcast Onemomentpleasepodcast.com IG:@onemomentpleasepodcast FB: OneMomentPlease Now on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCx5oL3xleUQuSJM3Cth5veA?sub_confirmation=1
Reflections from a large healthcare system not affiliated with a college of pharmacy on building a robust pharmacy research program. Full text manuscript available at: https://accpjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.1957.
In this episode of "This is Rural Health," we continue our special series featuring excerpts from the 2023 California State Rural Health Association (CSRHA) annual conference.Dr. Borowsky highlights the All of Us study, which aims to collect comprehensive health data from participants across the U.S. and return actionable genetic and health information to them. Dr. Borowsky also discusses the exciting potential of personalized nutrition through the CAPN (California Partnership for Personalized Nutrition) project, examining how individual responses to food can guide tailored dietary advice. Tune in to learn about the latest advancements in rural health and how these initiatives are set to transform the future of healthcare.What you'll learn in this episode:Introduction and gratitude to podcast supportersOverview of the 2023 CSRHA Annual ConferencePrecision Medicine Initiative and its goalsAll of Us study: objectives and participant engagementImportance of diversity in biomedical researchChallenges and strategies for outreach in rural health communitiesPrivacy and data security in health researchReturning actionable genetic results to participantsPersonalized nutrition and the CAPN projectUtilizing microbiome and genetic data for tailored dietary recommendationsFuture directions and potential benefits of personalized healthcareConnect with Us: On Facebook | @csrha.advocateOn Twitter | @CSRHA1 and @CSRHApodcastVisit our website | csrha.orgEmail Address | podcast@csrha.orgConnect with Dr. Borowsky on LinkedInAll of Us Research Program | allofus.nih.govThe CSRHA has been a go-to resource for rural healthcare and community leaders since 1995. The CSRHA brings an accumulation of actionable insights to the next generation of rural healthcare leaders. For more behind the scenes of this podcast follow @CSRHApodcast on Twitter or @csrha.advocate on Facebook.If you enjoy This Is Rural Health, we could use your support! Please consider leaving a 5-star rating and review, and share it with someone who needs to hear this!Learn more about the CSRHA at csrha.org.
Thoughts on Record: Podcast of the Ottawa Institute of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Comments or feedback? Send us a text!Assessing & treating adult ADHD can be both very challenging as well as highly rewarding for client and clinician alike. Psychologist & author, Dr. Russell Ramsay joins us for an in-depth discussion of the assessment and treatment of adult ADHD building on themes in his new workbook, The Adult ADHD and Anxiety Workbook. In this discussion we cover: why Dr. Ramsay wanted to write a workbook focused on both ADHD and anxiety and why individuals with ADHD may be particularly prone to anxietya brief description of the symptom clusters of ADHD and why a dimensional approach can be helpfulan evolutionary angle to understanding ADHDan extensive discussion of tricky diagnostic issues including: nuance around contextualizing the later emergence of childhood symptoms; assessing ADHD in female clients; understanding the impact of "masking" on the presentation of symptoms; the impact of high trait agreeableness and pleasing behaviours on functional impacts; the course of symptoms over the lifetimethe contribution of undiagnosed ADHD to treatment resistance around other co-morbid conditionsaddressing the interpersonal challenges that can come with ADHDunderstanding rejection sensitivity in the context of ADHD a strengths-based lens on ADHDthe so-called "ADHD tax"Comments or feedback? Email the podcast at: oicbtpodcast@gmail.comJ. Russell Ramsay, PhD, ABPP, is a licensed psychologist specializing in the assessment and psychosocial treatment of adult attention deficit/hyperactive disorder (ADHD). Before embarking on his solo virtual practice, he was cofounder and clinical director of the University of Pennsylvania's Adult ADHD Treatment and Research Program, where he was professor of clinical psychology in psychiatry. Ramsay is widely published, including five books on adult ADHD; lectures internationally and virtually; and is in the Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (CHADD) Hall of Fame. He is from the Greater Philadelphia, PA, area.
Beat Cancer hosts Chris Joyce and Stephanie Winn sit down with, Laura Fejerman, Ph.D., who is the Placer Breast Cancer Endowed Chair at the Cancer Center, the associate director for the Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, and also co-director for both the Women's Cancer Care and Research Program and the Latinos United for Cancer Health Advancement Initiative. We discuss her work with the community and how her programs work to reduce the cancer burden in underserved communities. Read more about the promotores program here. To learn more about the UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, visit https://health.ucdavis.edu/cancer/
Russell Ramsay, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist and an Assistant Professor of Psychology in Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. He serves as the Associate Director of Penn's Adult ADHD Treatment and Research Program, with a particular expertise in psychosocial treatments for adults with ADHD. Russell is back to discuss different forms of treatment for ADHD in particular the use of medications and understanding the use of Cognitive Behavioral therapy. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/out-of-the-blank/support
In this episode of The ADHD Podcast, hosts Pete Wright and Nikki Kinzer welcome a special guest - Dr. Russell Ramsay, co-founder and former co-director of the University of Pennsylvania's Adult ADHD Treatment and Research Program.Dr. Ramsay shares his insights into the complex interactions between ADHD and anxiety, two disorders that frequently coexist. He discusses how ADHD can be an "anxiety generator," with its intrinsic characteristics fueling feelings of uncertainty and perceived risk.From a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) perspective, Dr. Ramsay explores how thoughts, feelings, and behaviors intertwine in ADHD and anxiety. He highlights the importance of pausing, reflecting, and developing self-awareness to navigate these challenges.Dr. Ramsay also addresses the concept of "procrastivity" - escaping high-priority tasks by doing other productive things. He offers strategies for breaking this cycle and turning intentions into actions.With his extensive experience and new book, "The Adult ADHD and Anxiety Workbook," Dr. Ramsay provides valuable insights for those dealing with the challenging combination of ADHD and anxiety. Links & NotesThe Adult ADHD and Anxiety Workbook: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Skills to Manage Stress, Find Focus, and Reclaim Your LifeRussell RamsayDig into the podcast Shownotes Database (00:00) - Welcome to Taking Control: The ADHD Podcast (03:52) - ADHD & Anxiety ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
Keith, Eliza, and Paige are scheduled to travel with family, go to conferences and engage in science nerdiness, and do some hardcore development whether it's manuscripts or courses. So while we are otherwise engaged, we thought you would like to hear the top 10 WDFS interviews of all time! Interview #9 is with Dr. Colin Kay.Colin Kay at the Plants for Human Health Institute was a part of the team that was recently awarded a $20 million 5-year National Institutes of Health (NIH) Metabolomics and Clinical Assays Center (MCAC) award as part of the NIH Nutrition for Precision Health (NPH) initiative, within the NIH's" All of Us" Research Program. The program aims to inform more personalized nutrition and health recommendations.Ever have so much information coming at you that you don't know where to start? Colin joins the WDFS team to discuss how to organize and find information to answer questions about precision nutrition and what our bodies do with all that great nutrition once it gets inside. Find out about the metabolome and the exposome and what role they play in nutrition research that targets recommendations for specific individuals. Got a questions for us? Email us at wolfingdownfoodscience@gmail.comPlease take a minute to help others find our podcast by leaving a rating and comment on your podcasting app!
Dr. Michael Weinstein interviews Dr. Don Lazas, co-founder and chief medical officer of ObjectiveHealth about partnering with physicians to provide the tools needed to integrate clinical trials into their practice. ObjectiveHealth's digital health technology can help identity patients who are at risk of developing Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). Join Dr. Weinstein and Dr. Lazas as they explore new innovations in detecting and treating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and NASH, and how clinical research could benefit a GI practice and its patients. Produced by Andrew Sousa and Hayden Margolis for Steadfast Collaborative, LLC Mixed and mastered by Hayden Margolis Gastro Broadcast, Episode 58
Host Jonathan Hughes talks with Professor of the Practice of Biomedical Engineering and Global Health Emeritus at Duke University and founder of the International Research Institute (IRI) Dr. Robert Malkin about the importance of research and how he helps high school students get involved in it.
If you're a regular listener, you've probably heard me say that the pace of scientific discovery is moving faster than ever before. Or you may have heard the National MS Society remind us that we've seen as many advances in MS research in the past 5 years as we have in the previous 70 years. Have you ever wondered why? A major driver of this acceleration of discovery is the technology that allows scientists to analyze massive amounts of information looking for relationships or identifying characteristics that, without this technology, would be impossible to see. This category of tech is commonly referred to as big data. And we're closer than we've ever been to understanding the biological complexities of multiple sclerosis because we've learned to harness the computing power that allows scientists to discover those very small needles among those very large haystacks. My guest in this episode is Professor Sergio Baranzini. Professor Baranzini is this year's recipient of the Barancik Prize for Innovation in MS Research and he's someone who has successfully leveraged big data to drive big, game-changing discoveries in multiple sclerosis. We'll also share some good news about MS research funding from the federal government. We'll review newly published results from a study that has identified 3 subtypes of MS, each with a different disease trajectory. We'll share evidence from a study that focused on whether people over the age of 50 with nonactive MS should discontinue their disease-modifying therapy. And we'll tell you about the Canadian regulatory approval of a software-based medical device that can monitor MS disease activity by tracking eye movement -- all from an iPad that people with MS can use at home. We have a lot to talk about! Are you ready for RealTalk MS??! This Week: We're saluting Professor Sergio Baranzini, this year's winner of the Barancik Prize :22 Congress provides $20 million in FY2024 funding for the MS Research Program 1:57 A German research team has identified 3 subtypes of MS based on their unique immune cell signature found in a blood sample 4:10 A French research team focused their study on whether people over the age of 50 with nonactive MS should discontinue their DMT. Here's what they discovered 8:58 Health Canada has approved ETNA-MS. A software-based medical device that can monitor MS disease activity by tracking eye movement 12:48 Professor Sergio Baranzini discusses how big data has fundamentally changed scientific research, and how he's using it to find cures for MS 16:44 Share this episode 32:03 Have you downloaded the free RealTalk MS app? 32:24 SHARE THIS EPISODE OF REALTALK MS Just copy this link & paste it into your text or email: https://realtalkms.com/344 ADD YOUR VOICE TO THE CONVERSATION I've always thought about the RealTalk MS podcast as a conversation. And this is your opportunity to join the conversation by sharing your feedback, questions, and suggestions for topics that we can discuss in future podcast episodes. Please shoot me an email or call the RealTalk MS Listener Hotline and share your thoughts! Email: jon@realtalkms.com Phone: (310) 526-2283 And don't forget to join us in the RealTalk MS Facebook group! LINKS If your podcast app doesn't allow you to click on these links, you'll find them in the show notes in the RealTalk MS app or at www.RealTalkMS.com REGISTER for the MS Activist Rally https://events.zoom.us/ev/Ame2jWSuHmriG94cyQmlWHr45mgnzxkDv8oMZRGsrS3ZxiSj5rro~Anqb3dHg3ewiz4KNHn2Ena4bgli_WXlza_zcygZN3GinnleB6rO15OCzGQ STUDY: Multiple Sclerosis Endophenotypes Identified by High-Dimensional Blood Signatures are Associated with Distinct Disease Trajectories https://science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.ade8560 STUDY: High-Efficacy Therapy Discontinuation vs Continuation in Patients 50 Years and Older with Nonactive MS https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/article-abstract/2816799 Join the RealTalk MS Facebook Group https://facebook.com/groups/realtalkms Download the RealTalk MS App for iOS Devices https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/realtalk-ms/id1436917200 Download the RealTalk MS App for Android Deviceshttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=tv.wizzard.android.realtalk Give RealTalk MS a rating and review http://www.realtalkms.com/review Follow RealTalk MS on Twitter, @RealTalkMS_jon, and subscribe to our newsletter at our website, RealTalkMS.com. RealTalk MS Episode 344 Guest: Professor Sergio Baranzini Privacy Policy
Always believe in the power of your voice and your story to influence change. Whether it's at the local, state or national level, your experiences are valuable in making things better for you and many others dealing with the same circumstances and situations. We were honored that we had the opportunity to attend the National MS Society Public Policy Conference in Washington, D.C., the first week of March (officially MS Awareness Month!) and join nearly 200 other MS activists on Capitol Hill March 6 to advocate for MS-related legislative issues. We are grateful for the members of Congress and the legislative aides for our U.S. Senators from Michigan for meeting with us and other state MS Activists to discuss Congressional action to: • Prioritize the extension and improvement of access to telehealth by cosponsoring and supporting the CONNECT for Health Act • Prioritize $20 million for the MS Research Program in FY25 Join us for this episode we break down these two issues, why they are so important for people living with MS, and why your voice is needed in the MS community. Advocacy is always empowering. We all have a story to share. And nobody knows your story better than you. Take some time to become an MS activist today! And remember to rate, review and subscribe to A Couple Takes on MS Podcast for two insightful perspectives on this one multifaceted disease.
Dr. Russell Ramsay is a co-founder of the Penn Adult ADHD Treatment and Research Program, and served as professor of clinical psychology in the department of psychiatry of the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.He is author of Nonmedication Treatments for Adult ADHD (2010); Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adult ADHD (with Dr. Anthony Rostain, 2015) and The Adult ADHD Tool Kit (also with Dr. Anthony Rostain, 2015). His most recent book is Rethinking Adult ADHD: Helping Clients Turn Intentions into Actions (2020). In addition he has a popular blog on psychology today, rethinking adult ADHD. In today's episode we discuss: - Misconceptions people have about ADHD - What it is like to have ADHD - What kind of impairments it can cause - Medication based treatments for ADHD, their effectiveness and safety - And how you can approach ADHD treatment psychologicallyInterviewed by Dr. Alex Curmi - Give feedback here - thinkingmindpodcast@gmail.com Follow us here: Twitter @thinkingmindpod Instagram @thinkingmindpodcastIf you would like to enquire about an online psychotherapy appointment with Dr. Alex, you can email - alexcurmitherapy@gmail.comJoin Our Mailing List! - https://thinkingmindpod.aidaform.com/mailinglistsignupSUPPORT: buymeacoffee.com/thinkingmind
In this heartfelt episode of Navigating Cancer TOGETHER, Talaya Dendy had the privilege of speaking with the remarkable Dr. Sophia Edwards-Bennett, MD Ph.D., a board-certified radiation oncologist with an impressive background from institutions like Harvard's Cancer Therapeutics and Research Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Cornell Medical College. Dr. EB. is not only a multiple award-winning radiation oncologist but also a cancer ambassador, best-selling author, dynamic international speaker, podcaster, YouTuber, and advocate for a holistic approach to cancer treatment.We delved into the intricacies of radiation therapy, a treatment that remains a mystery to many. Dr. EB explained that it involves high-energy X-rays to kill cancer cells and emphasized that patients do not feel pain during the treatment. She also discussed the criteria for recommending radiation therapy, which depends on factors like the cancer stage and patient comorbidities. We learn about Dr. EB's "why" and so much more! This episode was a testament to the power of empathy, hope, and the human spirit in navigating cancer together.✨Highlights from the show:[00:02:34] Radiation therapy explained.[00:05:17] Radiation therapy determining factors.[00:14:42] Balancing clinical and emotional needs.[00:19:36] Addressing patient resilience during treatment.[00:24:44] Importance of faith and hope.[0:34:04] Dr. EB's Prose for Cancer Patients
Stine's winter nurseries and off-season production locations are essential to the success of our breeding program. Rodney Pentico, soybean research team leader for Stine, joins the Stine Seedcast to discuss the growth and intricacies of our South American research program. Learn about its evolution from the early days in Argentina to the current challenges of transporting seeds to and from the U.S. Stine's commitment to pushing boundaries year after year ensures we remain a genetic leader in the marketplace. Make sure you stay up to date on everything Stine by following us on all our social media: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/StineSeed Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/stineseedco/ X: https://twitter.com/StineSeed
Dr. Jennifer Ramp Neale is Director of Research and Conservation at the Denver Botanic Gardens. She is also an Adjunct Professor of Biology at the University of Northern Colorado and the University of Colorado Denver. The Denver Botanic Gardens is an accredited museum, a public nonprofit organization, and a research institution, so Jenny has a variety of different roles. She oversees the research conducted there, communicates their findings and the importance of science to different audiences, and works closely with land managers/owners to provide information on the local plants to help guide land management decisions. Jenny's research focuses on applied conservation of plants, particularly rare and endangered species in Colorado. Outside of work, Jenny is a wife, mother, and outdoors enthusiast. She enjoys being active outdoors with her family playing soccer, skiing, camping, hiking, and generally having fun outside. Jenny's passion for identifying plants and mushrooms is contagious, and as a result, her family has also become quite knowledgeable about the plants of Colorado. She received her B.S. in Biology from Rhodes College and her Ph.D. in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology from the University of Colorado. Afterwards, Jenny conducted postdoctoral research in community genetics at the University of Colorado. Jenny's previous positions include Manager of Research Programs and Associate Director of Research at the Denver Botanic Gardens, as well as Conservation Genetic Consultant with LSA Associates and Solano County Water Agency through the University of Colorado Museum. Jenny is the recipient of the 2012 Partners in Mission Recovery Champion Award as part of the Rare Plant Conservation Initiative from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. She joined us for an interview to talk about her experiences in life and science.
Russell Ramsay, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist and an Assistant Professor of Psychology in Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. He serves as the Associate Director of Penn's Adult ADHD Treatment and Research Program, with a particular expertise in psychosocial treatments for adults with ADHD. Russell joins me to discuss the difference between adult ADHD and childhood ADHD while discussing various ways subtypes interact with society and the difficulties people have in maintaining symptoms. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/out-of-the-blank/support
No two people are the same and that means the best healthcare is tailored to the individual. Creating a database that can shape the future of medicine. We look at what the "All of Us" research program wants from you.
This Day in Maine for Monday, December 11th, 2023.
The Harvard Medical School Celiac Education & Research Program and the National Celiac Association is hosting a webinar Building a Strong Foundation: Celiac Disease and Bone Health. Don't miss this deep dive into bone health: treatments, lifestyle modifications, supplements and more. Bone health is a crucial topic for both children and adults with celiac disease, as bone can be adversely affected due to inflammation and malabsorption of key nutrients. Webinar details:Wednesday, November 15, 2023, from 1- 2:15 pm ET.Registration: https://partners.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_fUfl2hOFRTa3Is4KuKQBcA?mc_cid=217f63c9ec&mc_eid=5a62c1a313#/registration Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Episode #135 of the Gotta Be Saints PodcastOn this episode, I spoke with Dr. Brian Miller about the case for Intelligent Design.Along with Dr. Miller sharing his story, we also spoke about:- The new book, God's Grandeur- Clearing up common misconceptions regarding intelligent design- What separates humans from the rest of creation- The relationship between the Church's teachings on evolution and the concept of intelligent design- Reasons that the everyday Catholic should pick up this book- And much more...Biography:Dr. Brian Miller is Research Coordinator for the Center for Science and Culture at Discovery Institute. He holds a B.S. in physics with a minor in engineering from MIT and a Ph.D. in physics from Duke University. He speaks internationally on the topics of intelligent design and the impact of worldviews on society, and helps manage the ID 3.0 Research Program, having been a primary organizer of the Conference on Engineering in the Life Sciences (CELS). He also has consulted on organizational development and strategic planning, and he is a technical consultant for TheStartup, a virtual incubator dedicated to bringing innovation to the marketplace. He has contributed to multiple books and journals covering the debate over intelligent design, including The Mystery of Life's Origin: The Continuing Controversy, The Comprehensive Guide to Science and Faith, and Inference Review. He is a regular contributor to Evolution News & Science Today, and the ID the Future Podcast.Helpful Links from Dr. Miller:Center for Science and Culture: https://www.discovery.org/id/ Evolution News and Science Today: https://evolutionnews.org/ Information on Intelligent Design: https://intelligentdesign.org/ My lecture on engineering and biology: https://youtu.be/M9i2vFEa6rE My chapter in Mystery of Life's Origin: https://www.discovery.org/m/2020/05/BMiller-ThermodynamicsMOLOchapter.pdf Contact Information: https://www.discovery.org/about/contact/Our Sponsors:This is a Good Catholic Podcast. If you're interested in purchasing a Good Catholic digital series, use code GBS for 20% off your total order.Looking for the perfect Catholic gift? Check out The Catholic Company and find it today! Use code BRENDAN for 20% off your next purchase! Support the show
Dr. Richard Webby, faculty member at St Jude Children's Research Hospital and global expert on influenza viruses, joins Drs. Mike Brasher, Karen Waldrop, and DU staff for a look back on the 2022 Avian Flu outbreak. In this science-heavy episode we ask where it came from, is it here to stay, and what can we expect going forward? We also learn why it is showing up in mammals and what this means for our pets. Also, will mutations increase the human health risk and are waterfowl hunters at higher risk?www.ducks.org/DUPodcast
Photo: No known restrictions on publication. @Batchelorshow #Turkey: Election toss-up. Soner Cagaptay is the Beyer Family fellow and director of the Turkish Research Program at The Washington Institute. He has written extensively on U.S.-Turkish relations, Turkish domestic politics, and Turkish nationalism, publishing in scholarly journals and major international print media, including the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, New York Times, Foreign Affairs, and The Atlantic. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/turkeys-disaster-and-erdogans-how-earthquake-could-spell-end-his-rule https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/03/27/erdogans-charm-offensive-will-not-satisfy-egypt-syria-israel/ https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/03/20/no-us-turkey-rapprochement-possible-under-erdogan/ https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/03/22/erdogan-turkey-uae-saudi-arabia-monarchy-islamism/
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
