Podcasts about melbourne university

Jefa Greenaway is the director of Greenaway Architects and an honorary fellow of Design at Deakin University and Adjunct Industry Fellow at Swinbourne university.  He is also a co-founder of several organizations set up to support Indigenous peoples pursuing a career in design.Greenaway was born on the Dharawal Country in Sydney. His father Bert Groves, was an Indigenous civil rights activist, and his mother was of German ancestry.He received his bachelor's degree in planning and design at the Melbourne University, where he was the only Indigenous person in his class at that time.In this exclusive interview, he talks to TAD about the true meaning and value of Designing for Country.This podcast is brought to you in association with Autex Acoustics, proud sponsors of our 2025 Sustainability series of podcasts.

In this eye-opening episode, Dr. Michelle McQuaid, Honourary Fellow at Melbourne University's Centre for Well-being Science and one of LinkedIn's top mental health thought leaders, shares her journey from being a "good girl" to embracing authenticity. Her research reveals 65% of women still feel pressured to conform to "good girl" expectations. Michelle explains how perfectionism, people-pleasing, and self-silencing initially seem rewarding but ultimately lead to exhaustion and a lost sense of self. She offers practical tools for breaking free, including self-compassion techniques and strategies for living authentically on your own terms. -----------------------   Inside My CEO Calendar: How I Led A Team of 5k+ Without Getting Pulled Back Into the Weeds A behind-the-scenes private podcast for senior female leaders and CEOs who don't need fluff—just sharper thinking, smarter moves, and more time for what matters. You don't have time for another 60-minute webinar. But you do have 15 minutes while you're driving into the office or grabbing your mid-day coffee. Listen here: https://www.bravefeminineleadership.com/BFL-Private-Podcast   ----------------------- Craving inspiration? I send an email each Sunday about leadership reflection, top tips to build an intentional & sustainable life and other things that have captured my attention and are too good not to share! Sign up here: https://www.bravefeminineleadership.com/leadershipinspiration   Loving the podcast? Leave us a short review. It takes less than 60 seconds & will inspire like-minded leaders to join the conversation!   Access Your Free Clarity Tool Between the endless to-do lists, competing priorities, and decisions piling up, it's easy to lose sight of what matters most. But here's the truth: you can't give more if you're running on empty. That's why we created Balance Your Brave—a free 15-minute diagnostic tool to help you regain control and clarity. In just 15 minutes, you will: ✅ Pinpoint energy drains holding you back. ✅ Identify where to focus for the biggest impact. ✅ Walk away feeling calmer and more confident in your next steps. Think of it as your personal roadmap to balance and alignment. ⬇️ Click here to access your free Balance Your Brave diagnostic tool. https://www.bravefeminineleadership.com/Balance-Your-Brave   Are we friends? Connect with Us. YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@bravefeminineleadership Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bravefeminineleadership Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/brave-feminine-leadership

393: Australian Team Marathon Announcement | Hanging Rock | Launceston Half Announcement This weeks episode is sponsored by Precision Fuel & Hydration,  their free online planner has you covered! It calculates exactly how much carb, sodium, and fluid you need to smash your goals. Listen to the show for an exclusive discount. Brad continues to build up his fitness. Julian survives a scare as he makes his preparations for the Great Ocean Half Marathon. Brady makes good on his word, keeping things easy this week. NordVPN has partnered with the Inside Running Podcast to offer you an amazing discount, head over to nordvpn.com/insiderunning to get a Huge Discount off your NordVPN Plan + 4 additional months on top!  This week's running news is presented by Axil Coffee. Australian Athletics announced their second phase of selections for the World Championship Team for Tokyo September, with Andy Buchanan, Tim Vincent, Leanne Pompeani and Izzi Batt-Doyle nominated to contest the marathon, with provisional spots for Vanessa Wilson and Liam Boudin. Australian Athletics   XCR25 begins the season anew this time at Hanging Rock where Andre Waring took out the 8km Open event in 24:13, followed by Matt Buckell and Liam Cashin. In the Men's Premier Division Western Athletics was the winning team ahead of Sandringham and then Box Hill. Katherine Dowie for Ballarat won in 29:21, ahead of Charlotte Wilson and Rachel McGuinness. Sandringham were the Premier Division winners, followed by South Melbourne and then Melbourne University. AthsVic Results Hub    Star-studded lineup announced for the 25th running of the Bowerman Mile at the Pre Classic, featuring the podium of the 1500m Paris Olympics Cole Hocker, Josh Kerr and Yared Nuguse as well as Jakob Ingebrigsten and Cam Myers. Press Release   Launceston Running Festival Elite Fields for the Half Marathon Announced, featuring elite Japanese men. Press Release   Enjoy 20% off your first Axil Coffee order! Use code IRP20 at checkout. Shop now at axilcoffee.com.au   Moose on the Loose calls out brands chasing clout on modern running crews, while the Whispers assess some of the field inclusions of Launceston Half.   This episode's Listener Q's/Training Talk segment is proudly brought to you by Precision Fuel & Hydration. This week's question asks whether beach running can substitute the hills. Visit precisionhydration.com for more info on hydration and fuelling products and research, and use the discount code given in the episode.  Patreon Link: https://www.patreon.com/insiderunningpodcast Opening and Closing Music is Undercover of my Skin by Benny Walker. www.bennywalkermusic.com Join the conversation at: https://www.facebook.com/insiderunningpodcast/ To donate and show your support for the show: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=9K9WQCZNA2KAN

"We live in an age where the expansion of possibility is actually greater than the latency of restrain."Are you interested in reinventing ourselves for better futures? What do you think about light cities? How can we create conscious urban evolution? Interview with Glenn Drew, CEO of SQUIZZ.COM, TOTECS and Connected Built. We will talk about his vision for the future of cities, intelligent evolution, light cities, AI, retrofitting, and many more.Glenn Drew is the CEO of SQUIZZ.com, TOTECS, and Connected Built. A visionary leader, he fosters innovation and empowers teams to achieve strategic success. Glenn founded his first eCommerce technology company, TOTECS, in 2000 while studying Computer Science at Melbourne University. Since 2011, he has led the development of SQUIZZ.com, supporting businesses across wholesale, retail, and manufacturing. With Connected Built, he aims to integrate industry professionals and partners to streamline the built environment, transitioning smart cities to light cities, infrastructure, and next-generation digital ecosystems through seamless connectivity and collaboration.Find out more about Glenn through these links:Glenn Drew on LinkedInSQUIZZ.com websiteSQUIZZ.com on LinkedInTOTECS websiteTOTECS on LinkedIn@totecs_ as TOTECS on Xtotecsdotcom as TOTECS on InstagramTOTECS on YouTubeConnected Built websiteConnected Built on LinkedInconnectedbuiltdotcom as Connected Built on InstagramConnecting episodes you might be interested in:No.228 - Interview with Dominique Hes about the city trapping in peopleNo.298 - Interview with Carina Gormley about the need for failure in governanceNo.312 - Interview with Gilbert Rochecouste about how the city is for funNo.219R - Intelligent urbanism with artificial intelligence in shaping tomorrow's smart citiesWhat was the most interesting part for you? What questions did arise for you? Let me know on Twitter ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@WTF4Cities⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or on the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠wtf4cities.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ website where the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠shownotes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ are also available.I hope this was an interesting episode for you and thanks for tuning in.Episode generated with ⁠⁠⁠Descript⁠⁠⁠ assistance (⁠⁠⁠affiliate link⁠⁠⁠).Music by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Lesfm ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠from ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Pixabay⁠

This week, stories of democracy, dreams, and things happening in and out of the ballot box. Elections Elsewhere by Phoebe Adler-Ryan Have you ever wondered how elections operate in other corners around the world? In our first story, ATB takes you on a ‘election tour’ of different countries as our volunteers - from China, Vietnam, some with connections to the US - gather to talk about what voting is like in their country. Can you vote in your country? What does voting mean to you? Featuring Lindsey Vassalo, Patrick McKenzie, Ray Vo and Sue. Counting the Vote by Grace Gooda Next story brings you into the Australian ballot box. In this story, we step inside election day through the eyes of an AEC worker - where impartiality, integrity, and counting replace the usual political buzz. From securing ballot bins to missing out on the ‘democracy sausage’, it’s a behind-the-scenes look at the quiet work that keeps Australia's democracy ticking. Welcome to a day in the life of a ballot counter. That story was produced by Grace Gooda in partnership with the Centre for Advancing Journalism and The Yarn from Melbourne University. Young Yarners by Micah Kickett Our third story explores the Young Yarners Program, a new initiative tackling voter disengagement in First Nations communities. From Parliament House workshops to local projects back home, young leaders from the program are building knowledge, breaking down barriers, and making sure Indigenous voices are heard loud and clear at the ballot box. That story was produced by Micah Kickett for The Wire. Young Matters by Ruby Perryman In this story, we hear from a young voter navigating life on Centrelink, housing insecurity, and the growing feeling that dreams like home ownership are slipping away. As the election approaches, it's not grand promises that shape her vote - it’s the urgent need for real support in an anxious, uncertain future. That story was produced by Ruby Perryman in partnership with the Centre for Advancing Journalism and The Yarn, from Melbourne University. Hope for the future by Catarina Fraga Matos and Kwame Slusher Confusion, curiosity, excitement to frustration. Young Australians paint a vivid palette of emotions as they face their first vote. Whether it’s dreaming of climate action, fairness, or just finally being heard, these young Australian voters have big hopes, even if the path to the ballot box is still a little messy. Hear them out. All The Best Credits Host Kwame Slusher Executive Producer: Phoebe Adler-Ryan Editorial Producer: Melanie Bakewell Community Coordinator: Patrick McKenzie Artwork Design: Lindsey Vassalo Mixed and Compiled by Emma Higgins Theme Music composed by Shining Bird See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

How do we let go of perfectionism and people-pleasing and learn to put our own needs first? This week, Jill speaks with Dr Michelle McQuaid, an internationally recognised positive psychology expert, about how more women are breaking free from damaging people-pleasing patterns and living as their authentic selves. Michelle is the author of six best-selling books, and an honorary fellow at Melbourne University's Centre for Wellbeing Science. Her life and work explore the intersection of mental health, identity, and the societal norms that quietly erode our sense of self, with a particular focus on how women are conditioned from an early age to be the ‘good girl', and how we can shed these limiting beliefs. She also recently found the courage to end her 23-year marriage and gained freedom and fulfilment as she enters what she describes as her “Grey Queer” years, exploring her bisexuality and prioritising her relationship with herself. Michelle also shares her fascinating personal story of growing up with a family background of drug addiction and homelessness, which has given her a unique perspective in building identity and resilience. You can find out more about Michelle's work through her website, read about her Good Girl Game Changers project on her Substack, and check out her book, The Perfectly Imperfect Little Girl, here. To stay in touch with Well Enough Alone, you can follow us on Instagram @wellenoughalonepod or follow Jill @jillstark__ Well Enough Alone is a Spare Room production. Our producers are Kieran Simpson and Trent Bartlett. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.    Get early access to new episodes by subscribing on Patreon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Research shows that by the time a girl reaches age 11, she has built the belief system that you earn love by pleasing others. But as we know, a life built around that sentiment, is destined for poor mental health when your internal reward system is - put others happiness before your own, to please and ‘be a good girl’ in the eyes of the community around us. Dr. Michelle McQuaid spent years of her adult life ticking the boxes of what we are told will provide us fulfilment and happiness - a great career, good financial income, getting married and having children and once those boxes were ticked, life will set and fulfilling. But what happens when you tick those boxes, yet you find yourself ignoring your inner voice in the sacrifice to achieve them and side-line your mental well-being to keep it on track? Dr. McQuaid found herself exhausted, burnt out and deeply unhappy and it came to a point after her midlife, where it was time to stop and look at how did she get here, and why was she so conditioned to ignore her sense of self to achieve the ideals of others. So we sit down with Dr. McQuaid, an Honorary Fellow of the Centre for Wellbeing Science at Melbourne University, blogs for Psychology Today, and has been featured in Forbes, the Harvard Business Review, the Wall Street Journal and more to unpack what she has learned through research around the grooming of good girls and it’s impact as the good girl grows into a women. Rebecca Bull – Creator / Executive Producer / Co-Host Zoe Weir – Co-Creator / Co – Host Sophie Jackson – Producer Social Media – Naughty Nancy Social Media Agency Website / Brand Design – Foster Creative Video Editor – Luke MorganSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this Mini motivation episode host Amelia Phillips speaks with psychologist Anna Nikolaou about the signs that our nervous system is in overdrive. They draw the links between emotional stress and physical to better help connect the two. Then they discuss strategies to restore balance, and whether talk therapy can help. About the guest: Anna Nikolaou is a registered psychologist with the Psychology Board of Australia & a dedicated member of the Australian Psychological Society. Anna holds a Master’s Degree in Psychology, where her thesis explored the role of coping strategies as mediators between attachment styles & psychological distress. Furthering her expertise, Anna completed a postgraduate degree in Adolescent Health & Welfare at Melbourne University. Whilst studying her Masters, Anna worked in Child Protection for the Department of Family, Fairness & Housing. Connect and work with Anna:@annanikolaou_psychology https://www.instagram.com/macleodwellnesscentre/ www.annanikolaou.com.auMacleodwellnesscentre.com.au About the host: Amelia Phillips is a registered exercise scientist and nutritionist with a career spanning 26 years in health. She's a registered exercise scientist, nutritionist and researcher (with a Masters of Human Nutrition). She was the co-founder of health tech company 12WBT which grew from start-up and more recently Inner Vitality, an 8 week online program using biomarkers and personalised health that she runs with an Integrative GP. Amelia also consults to health companies, presents and appears in the media, most recently on the Ch9 show Do You Want to Live Forever. Amelia had four kids in five years and is dedicated to empowering women to build a life after kids on the foundation of health (mental and physical), connection and purpose. If you have a question for Amelia, reach out via Insta @_amelia_phillips, email ap@ameliaphillips.com.au Find out more at www.ameliaphillips.com.au Find out more about Inner Vitality, a new approach to your health: https://innervitality.ameliaphillips.com.au/pages/ CREDITSHost: Amelia Phillips Guest: Anna Nikolaou Audio Producer: Darren RothMusic: Matt Nicholich Production Partner: Nova Entertainment Pty Ltd Healthy Her acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the Land we have recorded this podcast on, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Supermarkets play a pivotal role in the daily lives and finances of millions of Australians.  In this episode, we'll delve into the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's (ACCC) major inquiry into the supermarket industry. One of the experts who made a submission to the ACCC for this inquiry discusses key issues such as: Price gouging concerns and evidence of abnormal profits Market structure and consumer experience Pricing strategies and trends Perishable products and food waste Future recommendations for fair competition Tune in to learn more on how this inquiry could reshape the supermarket sector and deep dive into issues around the cost of groceries. Host: Tiffany Tan CPA, Audit and Assurance Lead, Policy and Advocacy, CPA Australia Guest: Professor Matthew Pinnuck from the University of Melbourne Head online to read the final report on supermarkets by the ACCC.  You can also read the ACCC's interim report on supermarkets, the inquiry's overview as well as learn more about the ACCC and the scope of its work. Additionally, you can see Professor Pinnuck's submission to the inquiry, as well as the ACCC's information on the food and grocery code of conduct for the industry. For more on Professor Matthew Pinnuck, head to his Melbourne University expert profile page.  You can find a CPA at our custom portal on the CPA Australia website. Would you like to listen to more With Interest episodes? Head to CPA Australia's podcast tab on its YouTube channel CPA Australia publishes four podcasts, providing commentary and thought leadership across business, finance, and accounting: With Interest INTHEBLACK INTHEBLACK Out Loud Excel Tips Search for them in your podcast platform. Email the podcast team at podcasts@cpaaustralia.com.au

In this episode of Healthy Her, host Amelia Phillips and psychologist Anna Nikolau discuss the strategies to become just that little bit happier. They discuss the reasons why many Mums are feeling unhappy despite having a seemingly 'wonderful' life. They unpack whether our happiness is dependant on good things happening, or whether you can feel happy during dark times and feel dark during happy times. They talk through real life examples of how powerful a reframe can be, including Dr Kristy Goodwin's powerful story. Follow Dr Kristy: https://www.instagram.com/drkristy/ . They then work through the top strategies we can implement that are designed to have us feeling happier almost instantly, with practical techniques we can use straight away. About the guest: Anna Nikolaou is a registered psychologist with the Psychology Board of Australia & a dedicated member of the Australian Psychological Society. Anna holds a Master’s Degree in Psychology, where her thesis explored the role of coping strategies as mediators between attachment styles & psychological distress. Furthering her expertise, Anna completed a postgraduate degree in Adolescent Health & Welfare at Melbourne University. Whilst studying her Masters, Anna worked in Child Protection for the Department of Family, Fairness & Housing. Connect and work with Anna:@annanikolaou_psychology: https://www.instagram.com/macleodwellnesscentre/ www.annanikolaou.com.auMacleodwellnesscentre.com.au About the host: Amelia Phillips is a registered exercise scientist and nutritionist with a career spanning 26 years in health. She's a registered exercise scientist, nutritionist and researcher (with a Masters of Human Nutrition). She was the co-founder of health tech company 12WBT which grew from start-up and more recently Inner Vitality, an 8 week online program using biomarkers and personalised health that she runs with an Integrative GP. Amelia also consults to health companies, presents and appears in the media, most recently on the Ch9 show Do You Want to Live Forever. Amelia had four kids in five years and is dedicated to empowering women to build a life after kids on the foundation of health (mental and physical), connection and purpose. If you have a question for Amelia, reach out via Insta @_amelia_phillips, email ap@ameliaphillips.com.au Find out more at www.ameliaphillips.com.au Find out more about Amelia's programs at Vitality360 v360.health CREDITSHost: Amelia Phillips Guest: Anna Nikolaou Audio Producer: Darren RothMusic: Matt Nicholich Production Partner: Nova Entertainment Pty Ltd Healthy Her acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the Land we have recorded this podcast on, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy informationSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome to another episode of On the Couch, the podcast series where we chat with brokers, CEOs, and fund managers to give you valuable insights into the investing world.In this episode, Henry Jennings is joined by Dr Nina Webster, CEO and Managing Director of Dimerix (ASX: DXB), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company working on treatments for inflammatory diseases. With a market cap of $270 million, Dimerix is advancing its proprietary Phase 3 candidate DMX-200 to treat Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), a rare kidney disease, and is also developing DMX-700 for respiratory disease.Nina has over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry, with leadership roles across research, development, and commercialisation. She was formerly Commercial Director at Acrux (ASX: ACR), an Australian pharmaceutical company that successfully developed and commercialised multiple products globally. She is also Non-Executive Chairperson for SYNthesis BioVentures and a Non-Executive Director at Linear Clinical Research Limited. Dr Webster holds a Ph.D in Pharmaceutics from Cardiff University, a Bachelor's degree in Pharmacology, a Master's in Intellectual Property Law from Melbourne University, and an Executive MBA from RMIT.Talking Points:Dimerix is focused on developing and commercialising new treatments for inflammatory diseases with poor outcomes. The leading drug candidate is a treatment for a rare kidney disease known as FSGS - what's the nature of this disease and its current treatment?What's changed, and how did DXB come about?DMX-200 is now in a global Phase 3 clinical trial - an update on the trial and when results are expected.The upside from here following DXB's strong run.Are all the eggs in one basket if this trial is not successful? What is Plan B?Three successful commercial deals - how they came together.CEOs shouldn't speculate on future licensing deals, but the US market is always the big one. What interest has there been from US pharma companies?How does what's happening in the US impact Dimerix? Elon Musk has been vocal about the FDA, and with Kennedy in charge, is there extra risk of regulatory slowdowns?NEU as a playbook - Dr Webster previously worked with NEU's CEO at Acrux. Is Dimerix a bona fide Neuren replica?Cash reserves and burn rate - what's the current financial position?Who are Dimerix's biggest shareholders?If the FSGS trial goes well, what happens next? Licensing?What will be the major Dimerix milestones for 2025?A deep dive into Dimerix, the biotech sector, and what's ahead for the company.Listen now to hear the full conversation.Disclaimer: This is general advice only. Please consult your financial adviser before making any investment decisions.If you're looking for personal financial advice, our friends at Clime Investment Management can help. Their team of licensed advisers operates across most states, offering tailored financial planning services.Want to invest with Marcus Today? The Managed Strategy Portfolio is designed for investors seeking exposure to our strategy while we do the hard work for you.Why not sign up for a free trial? Gain access to expert insights, research, and analysis to become a better investor.

In this podcast we talk to Dr Jasleen Jolly, Associate Professor at Jolly Vision Science and Honorary fellow at Melbourne University. We are also joined by Yvette Chivers, Helpline Coordinator at Retina UK, who is living with Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) and experiences CBS.Charles Bonnet Syndrome is phenomenon where some people with sight loss experience visual hallucinations. Tune in to find out more about CBS, Yvette's experience and the work that Dr Jasleen Jolly is doing.Researchers at Cardiff University are currently looking for participants to take part in a 60 minute online survey about experiences of Charles Bonnet syndrome, which is open to anyone with sight loss, regardless of whether they experience hallucinations. The survey asks about the nature of your visual impairment, your experiences of CBS (if any), and your visual imagination. For more information, visit https://tinyurl.com/sight-impairment-study.

About Leah Martin-BrownEven before picking up her first guitar at age 11, Leah Martin-Brown knew she was destined to become a musician.Born in Brisbane, Queensland and raised in the beautiful beach town Burleigh Heads, Leah would play anywhere there was a stage- oftentimes begging family friends who owned bars and restaurants to let her set up and play a few tunes. By the time she was 16, Leah was writing, recording and performing her original music all over the Gold Coast and surrounding areas- regularly being booked for locally run festivals, youth events and the occasional nightclub with her newly named project 'Lilly Rouge'.Leah finished high school and was accepted into the 'Bachelor of Popular Music' program at Griffith University which she graduated from in 2011. Still knowing that she desperately wanted to continue writing and performing music but not quite sure how to support herself doing so, Leah moved down to Melbourne in Victoria and began working on a Master of Music Education at Melbourne University. While she did not fall in love with teaching, she found new life within the vibrant Melbourne music scene, inspiring her to immediately change her hair colour to her signature red and, also, to defer her Degree and begin fully focusing on her band- 'Lilly Rouge'.September 2012 saw Leah return to her home state of Queensland to begin writing and recording with Brisbane based Producer, Stuart Stuart (The Veronica's, Sheppard). The two co-wrote over 30 tracks, most of which were released on 'Lilly Rouge" records.This set Leah and her band up for two Australian National tours, support slots for 'Everclear', 'Presidents of the United States' and 'The Getaway Plan' and a set at 2013's 'Big Day Out' Festival.This caught the eyes and ears of Los Angeles, CA based A&R Company- A&R Worldwide. They invited Leah to California to work on some new music with Producer, Brian Howes (Airbourne, Skillet, Hinder, Nickelback) and showcase at music industry event 'Musexpo'. It was at this point that Leah disbanded Lilly Rouge and created 'Evol Walks'.Leah spent the next 5 years extensively playing shows in her new home of Los Angeles, CA as well as touring through Australia, West Coast USA and parts of Europe, releasing 2 EPs and several singles with the band.In 2020, Leah relocated to Stockholm, Sweden where, as well as writing and recording new music, she was given the opportunity to work and record an album with legendary Producer & Songwriter Robert ‘Mutt' Lange and acclaimed songwriter & producer Tony Nilsson.In 2024, Leah Martin-Brown spends the bulk of her time in Los Angeles, CA but is consistently travelling the world writing, recording and playing wherever she can.She has shared the stage with Dreamtheatre, Flogging Molly, Nita Strauss, Glen Sobel, Johnny Depp and Joe Perry and many more.

Are mushrooms the missing piece in your health journey? Lee Carroll, Chief Medical Herbalist at Real Mushrooms, takes you deep into the world of functional fungi. From boosting your immune system to enhancing gut health, Lee explains how mushrooms pack a punch with unique compounds like ergothioneine, which supports mitochondrial health and acts as a powerful antioxidant. You'll learn why a pound of mushrooms a week could transform your wellness and why quality matters—ditch those mycelium-fermented grains! With tips on incorporating mushrooms like Five Defenders into your routine, Lee offers practical advice for harnessing their full potential. Curious about how mushrooms can elevate your health? This episode serves up the evidence you need to start your mushroom journey today.   Resources: Order Here - https://shop.realmushrooms.com?ref=147   About Lee Carroll: Lee is a leading medical herbalist, innovator, speaker, educator and mentor with over 30 years' experience in the herbal industry, 23 years teaching herbal medicine to health care professionals, and 11 years in private practice. Over the course of his long career, Lee has helped thousands of people transform their health and lives through his insightful, personalized, practical and effective herbal medicine solutions. In clinic, Lee artfully combines the best of traditional western herbal medicine within a framework of contemporary bio-medical science and research. Lee's expertise helps us deliver the most accurate and trustworthy health and wellness information from a holistic perspective. His knowledge of plant medicine runs deep and he is passionate about helping the public and practitioners understand how to use herbs and mushrooms to address health issues. Lee's Credentials: Full member of the Naturopaths and Herbalists Association of Australia (Australia's oldest professional association of complementary therapists.) Bachelor of Health Science (Western Herbal Medicine), BHSc (whm). 2009-2013. Endeavour College of Natural Health, Brisbane, Australia Bachelor of Science (Botany), BSc. 1979-1983. Melbourne University, Parkville, Australia Worked in various roles for MediHerb between 1990 to 2009 including being the research and development manager, U.S. business manager, and practitioner educator Private practice clinician since 2013 Self-employed consultant for practitioner education and product research and development since 2009 Learn more about Lee at his website: https://www.leecarrollherbalist.com/ Connect with Anna: Email: annamarie@happywholeyou.com / info@HappyWholeYou.com Website: www.happywholeyou.com / https://linktr.ee/happywholeyou Instagram: @happywholeyou Facebook: Happy Whole You LinkedIn: Anna Marie Frank Venmo: @happywholeyou

Ever wondered if energy-efficient homes are the next big thing in real estate? Or is the industry still lagging on this? In this episode, we're diving into how sustainability is shaking up the property game, and we've got Jacob Caine, president of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria, to give us the inside scoop. Jacob was at the 2024 UN Climate Change Conference, representing Australian real estate, so he knows what's up. We're talking about how climate change – from crazy weather events to skyrocketing energy bills – is changing what buyers want and how much homes are worth. Will houses with bad energy ratings become impossible to sell or get a loan for? We're also looking at how banks are getting involved, new rating systems, and how energy-efficient features are becoming more than just a nice-to-have – they're protecting your investment. But there's also the practical stuff: what can homeowners and investors do right now to stay ahead of the curve? Jacob's got tips on everything from solar panels to minimum rental standards, and how these changes will affect everyday decisions about property. So, if you're curious about how property, climate, and money all fit together, this episode is packed with info you won't want to miss. Episode Highlights: 00:00 - Introduction 01:11 - Who is Jacob Caine? 02:04 - What motivated Jacob's attendance at COP 29, and what were his key goals? 03:33 - How important is Australia’s contribution to the global sustainability movement? 08:21 - How reliable is CoreLogic’s analysis without a rating system for existing homes? 14:18 - How soon will energy ratings become a key factor in property markets? 21:05 - Will banks require property upgrades to approve financing? 25:11 - What does resilience mean in the context of property? 27:41 - Do home builders have a valid point about energy efficiency standards raising costs? 36:53 - How quickly can we transition to renewable energy according to the model? 41:58 - Energy ratings or home renovations: which one is responsible for price increases? 48:46 - Do you agree that property managers are getting overwhelmed by new requirements? 52:54 - Should energy efficiency efforts prioritise apartments over individual houses? 59:03 - Jacob Caine’s property dumbo About Our Guest: Jacob Caine is the CEO of Ray White CRE and is serving his second term as President of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria, with directorship roles at the Real Estate Institute of Australia and View.com.au. A licensed estate agent with extensive leadership experience, he has an impressive academic background, holding a Bachelor’s degree from Melbourne University, an MBA from Monash, and a Master’s in International Relations from Harvard, where he graduated on the Dean’s List. Currently pursuing a PhD at the National Security College (ANU), Jacob’s research focuses on the evolution of cyberattacks. His professional credentials include certificates in leadership, negotiation, and international security from Harvard, among others. Connect with Jacob Caine: Ray White CRE https://raywhitecre.com.au/ Website https://view.com.au/ LinkedIn https://au.linkedin.com/in/jacob-caine-30195647 Resources: Visit our website https://www.theelephantintheroom.com.au If you have any questions or would like to be featured on our show, contact us at: The Elephant in the Room Property Podcast questions@theelephantintheroom.com.au Looking for a Sydney Buyers Agent? https://www.gooddeeds.com.au Work with Veronica: https://www.veronicamorgan.com.au Looking for a Mortgage Broker? https://www.flintgroup.au Work with Chris: chrisbates@flintgroup.au Enjoyed the podcast? Don't miss out on what's yet to come! Hit that subscription button, spread the word and join us for more insightful discussions in real estate. Your journey starts now! Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@theelephantintheroom-podcast Subscribe on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ph/podcast/the-elephant-in-the-room-property-podcast/id1384822719 Subscribe on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3Ge1626dgnmK0RyKPcXjP0?si=26cde394fa854765 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This episode is going to shatter the phrase ‘good girl' for you FOREVER. You'll see why striving to be a 'good girl' is robbing you of your energy, well-being & even your identity plus learn the research backed strategy on how to set yourself free to live the life YOU want to live. Dr Michelle McQuaid is an honorary fellow at Melbourne University's Center for Wellbeing Science & author of The Perfectly Imperfect Little Girl & The Perfectly Imperfect Women's Journal. Want to become a podcast sponsor, got some feedback for me or just fancy a chat? Email me - thatshelpful@edstott.com CONNECT WITH US Connect with ⁠That's Helpful on Instagram. Find Dr Michelle via ⁠her website & on substack. BOOKSJoin The Perfectly Imperfect Books Launch Party PODCASTSLife Lessons in Divorce and Breakups with Helen ThornThe Good Girl Gamechangers Podcast This episode covers: parenting, raising girls, relationships, attachment, mindset, psychology, raising boys, patriarchy, masculinity, anger, identity, knowing yourself, mothering yourself, conforming to patriarchal standards, liberation, being empowered.

Systems change, or in fact any change, in formal education systems is notoriously hard. Research and innovation across the sector has been historically weak. But as the stakes get higher for much-needed change, we have to get better at harnessing the collective intelligence of what we know, from young people to practitioners in classrooms everyday to parents and leaders. This week's guest has been working at the heart of this issue since the 1990s. Sir Geoff Mulgan is a Professor at University College London (UCL), in the Science, Technology, Engineering and Policy team (STEaPP) in the engineering department.  Before that he was Chief Executive of Nesta, the UK's innovation foundation from 2011-2019. From 1997-2004 he had roles in the UK government including director of the Government's Strategy Unit, director of the Performance and Innovation Unit and head of policy in the Prime Minister's office. From 2004-2011 he was first CEO of the Young Foundation.  Geoff has been a reporter on BBC TV and radio and was the founder/co-founder of many organisations, including Demos, Uprising, the Social Innovation Exchange, the Australia Centre for Social Innovation and Action for Happiness. He has a PhD in telecommunications and has been visiting professor at LSE and Melbourne University, and senior visiting scholar at Harvard University. Geoff has advised many governments, businesses, NGOs and foundations around the world. He is currently an adviser to the European Parliament on science and technology and a senior fellow with Demos Helsinki. He was a senior fellow at the New Institute in Hamburg (2020-2022) and a World Economic Forum Schwab Fellow (2019-22). He recently chaired a European Commission programme on ‘Whole of Government Innovation' and co-founded TIAL, The Institutional Architecture Lab.   Past books include ‘Good and Bad Power' (Penguin, 2005), ‘The Art of Public Strategy' (Oxford University Press, 2008), ‘The Locust and the Bee' (Princeton University Press, 2012), ‘Big Mind: how collective intelligence can change our world' (Princeton University Press, 2017),  ‘Social innovation: how societies find the power to change' (Policy Press, 2019), 'Prophets at a Tangent: how art shapes social imagination' (Cambridge University Press, 2023) and ‘When Science Meets Power' (Polity, 2023/24).  His books have been translated into many languages.  A summary of the books can be found here. He is a founding joint editor-in-chief of the journal Collective Intelligence (Sage/ACM). Many of the ideas Geoff has worked on have gone onto become mainstream, from creative economy strategies to social investing, open data to collective intelligence,  experimental and evidence-based government to challenge-driven innovation. Geoff has given TED talks on the future economy, happiness and education. His website is geoffmulgan.com. He has a CBE and was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II in 2020.  Social Links LinkedIn: @sir-geoff-mulgan - https://www.linkedin.com/in/sir-geoff-mulgan-aa1079187/ Website: https://www.geoffmulgan.com/

A Chinese student makes weekly trips to Melbourne University for face-to-face classes to meet the attendance criteria. Is this the world’s longest and most insane commute?!?! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week on Self Improvement Wednesday, Dr Lauren Rosewarne, from Melbourne University's School of Social and Political Sciences, teaches us about her very festive special subject: Christmas films. 

Join us for a compelling and eye-opening session at the Melbourne University Conference, where Jacob Little, a former inmate turned advocate, shares his lived experiences within the prison system. In this thought-provoking talk, Jacob will recount his personal journey, shedding light on the realities of life behind bars and the challenges he faced during his time in jail. With unfiltered honesty, Jacob will delve into the dynamics of prison culture, the impact of incarceration on mental health, and the lessons he learned while navigating this harsh environment. He will also explore the systemic issues within the justice system and provide insights into how these experiences shaped his views on rehabilitation and reintegration into society. This session is not only a reflection on personal resilience but also a call to action for understanding and reform. Ideal for students, educators, and those interested in justice, sociology, or human rights, Jacob's talk promises to leave attendees with a deeper understanding of the prison experience and the importance of empathy and systemic change.

Today we are exploring infertility evaluation, history and diagnosticsThis podcast is sponsored by Genea Fertility. Genea has been helping create families for almost four decades. Their world leading IVF science and technology delivers success rates consistently higher than the national average, ensuring your patients have the best chance of a healthy baby. Referral and patient resources can be found at genea.com.au'To discuss this topic, we are joined by Dr Genia Rozen is a Senior Clinical Lecturer and Clinical School Tutor at Melbourne University. Dr Rozen is involved in the fertility preservation service at Genea and Royal Women's Hospital.

Dr Shane is joined by co-hosts Drs Scarlett and Laura. In science news water on Mars, detection of other planets and obesity.Joann Cattlin PhD Candidate from RMIT University talks about the societal impact of scientific research; Dr Ching Yi Wu from Melbourne University talks about Fun-IVCM (Functional In Vivo Confocal Microscopy); and Dr Scarlett talks about what it means to be a modern human.Program page: Einstein-A-Go-Go Facebook page: Einstein-A-Go-Go Twitter: Einstein-A-Go-Go

Dr. Ursula Betka was one of my favourite lecturers and tutors during my 6 years at Melbourne University studying art history in the 1990's.  Her area of specialisation, in which she has a Ph.D,  focused on Medieval and Renaissance sacred images. On 3rd December, Ursula's beautiful new book, published by Hardie Grant, is coming out and I was lucky enough to receive an advance copy.  Titled “Techniques of Painting and Gilding in Late Medieval and Early Renaissance Italy.  Egg Tempera and Gold Leaf on Wood Panel”, this sumptuously illustrated, hard back book is a detailed technical manual on the time-honoured painting tradition of egg tempera, used historically for sacred images of the Madonna and Child. Ursula works in a range of historical materials and methods such as egg tempera painting and gilding on wood, parchment and glass, exploring ways in which these traditions and techniques might convey profound beauty and resonate meaning today. Ursula integrates her practice with the teaching and writing of art history by examining the function and context of sacred art objects and the ways in which artistic creation expresses the yearnings of the soul. The enduring symbolic values associated with pigments and colours, exotic decorative fabrics and various landscape and architectural settings is also explored. Ursula's book-launch coincides with an exhibition of works featured in the book. See the links below for details and where to buy Ursula's book. Links for this episode: See the full blog post for this episode Buy Ursula's book- Australia Independent bookshop Buy Ursula's book- Amazon See Ursula's exhibition Nov 18-Dec 6 2024 Artist Demonstration workshops Ursula's Instagram Ursula does not have a website, feel free to email her at ursulabetka@gmail.com  or contact her on Instagram General Susan Nethercote Links:Consider donating the price of a coffee to support this podcast on my KOFI page (thank you!): ⁠https://ko-fi.com/Y8Y0PTP3J⁠ Suse's Instagram Suse's website Suse's Youtube Channel Suse's Facebook

Read the full transcript here. Why do we suffer? Would we still suffer if we got rid of all craving and aversion? Is pain the same thing as suffering? How is suffering connected to the concept of self? Should people in horrible situations attempt to remove themselves from those environments or try to improve their plights in any way; or should they merely free themselves from suffering by releasing their "craving" for well-being and their "aversion" to misery? Why would the dissolution of the self free someone from suffering? Are we identical to our bodies and/or minds? Is attention the same thing as the self? Is the concept of "no-self" analytical or empirical? How does "flow" differ from distraction? Is it irrational to pursue our own happiness without regard for others? How and where do Buddhist ethics overlap with the ethics taught by (e.g.) Abrahamic religions? What are the roles of meditators in Buddhist monasteries? What do Buddhists believe about god(s)? What do they believe about reincarnation? Is reincarnation different from rebirth? What is the role of the Buddha himself in Buddhism? Can these concepts be understood and/or experienced without meditating or studying Buddhist texts?Jay L. Garfield is Doris Silbert Professor in the Humanities and Professor of Philosophy and Buddhist Studies at Smith College, Visiting Professor of Buddhist philosophy at Harvard Divinity School, Professor of Philosophy at Melbourne University, and Adjunct Professor of Philosophy at the Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies. Garfield's research addresses topics in the foundations of cognitive science and the philosophy of mind; metaphysics; the history of modern Indian philosophy; topics in ethics, epistemology, and the philosophy of logic; the philosophy of the Scottish enlightenment methodology in cross-cultural interpretation; and topics in Buddhist philosophy, particularly Indo-Tibetan Madhyamaka and Yogācāra. He is the author or editor of over 30 books and over 200 articles, chapters, and reviews. A few of his most recent books include How to Lose Yourself: An Ancient Guide to Letting Go (with Maria Heim and Robert Sharf 2024), Losing Ourselves: Learning to Live without a Self (2022), and Knowing Illusion: Bringing a Tibetan Debate into Contemporary Discourse (with the Yakherds 2021), and Buddhist Ethics: A Philosophical Exploration (2021). Learn more about him at his website, jaygarfield.org. StaffSpencer Greenberg — Host / DirectorJosh Castle — ProducerRyan Kessler — Audio EngineerUri Bram — FactotumWeAmplify — TranscriptionistsMusicBroke for FreeJosh WoodwardLee RosevereQuiet Music for Tiny Robotswowamusiczapsplat.comAffiliatesClearer ThinkingGuidedTrackMind EasePositlyUpLift[Read more]

"Un premio con un valore emotivo", il professore emerito della Melbourne University ha ottenuto il riconoscimento dell'ACCA, l'Australian Calabrese Cultural Association. "L'Australia di oggi deve tantissimo agli immigrati calabresi".

Federal Shadow Education Minister Sarah Anderson joined Drive, before Jacqui Felgate had her say on what took place at Melbourne University. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Gursh is the Chief Scientist at MX3 Diagnostics who are best known for its hydration testing and will be soon launching a saliva-based lactate threshold test. Gursh did his PhD at King's College in London before working at UC San Diago and NICTA. Currently, he is both an Honorary Senior Research Fellow at Melbourne University and the Chief Scientist of MX3 Australia Sports Innovation Week This episode is brought to you by the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Australia Sports Tech Conference⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, the Southern Hemisphere's largest and most respected sports technology industry event. This year's edition is happening on Thursday, October 24th in Melbourne, Victoria. Agenda, tickets, and more info available at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://stws.co/conference-australia⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ _____ Subscribe to the Sports Tech Feed newsletter. Your source for in-depth sports technology insights, news, and analysis: ⁠⁠⁠⁠sportstechfeed.substack.com

In this episode, Professor Rory O'Connor and Craig spoke to the Research Programme Lead at MQ Mental Health Research, Mariana Bolivar, and Research Associate and PhD student at the University of Oxford, Thomas Hakman. As the lines between the offline and online worlds blur, the impact of internet use on young people's mental health has become a critical concern. With an overwhelming amount of information available, it can be challenging to separate evidence-based knowledge from low-quality sources. In response, MQ Mental Health Research, in collaboration with Melbourne University and the Oxford Internet Institute, has conducted a comprehensive review to understand the true effects of the internet on youth mental health. In this conversation, they discussed the recent findings from the study, how to stay safe online, and whether the internet is truly harmful.

"Writing Tales of Love and Resilience: Italian Connections" è il titolo di un incontro alla Melbourne University dedicato al lavoro di 3 autrici australiane che si sono confrontate con i temi dell'amore, della ricerca interiore e della resilienza.

Send your questions or provocations to Adam or Budi here!In the final book club episode of the year, Adam and Budi discuss 'Touching the Rock', by John Hull.Hull was born in 1935, in Corryong in the state of Victoria, Australia. Following a first degree at Melbourne University and an early career in teaching, he studied theology in Cambridge, UK, where he remained, working as a teacher, religious educator and theologian.As a religious educator Hull was influenced by extensive study in the complimentary disciplines of psychology, anthropology, sociology and politics. He presented an inclusive and pluralistic religious education as a critically open study which he believed should be seen primarily as a ‘gift' to students' personal and intellectual development.In 1980, Hull lost his sight and for the last 35 years of his life was totally blind. He wrote extensively about the experience, including reflections on how blindness had changed and deepened his faith. His book, ‘Touching the Rock' was the basis for an award-winning film, ‘Notes on Blindness', which came out after his death.Support the showIf you enjoyed this week´s podcast, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts. To submit a question: Voice- http://www.speakpipe.com/theatreofothers Email- podcast@theatreofothers.com Show Credits Co-Hosts: Adam Marple & Budi MillerProducer: Jack BurmeisterMusic: https://www.purple-planet.comAdditional compositions by @jack_burmeister

Presented in partnership with Fertility and Sterility onsite at the 2024 ANZSREI meeting in Sydney, Australia.  The ANZSREI 2024 debate discussed whether patients with unexplained infertility should go straight to IVF. Experts on both sides weighed the effectiveness, cost, and psychological impact of IVF versus alternatives like IUI. The pro side emphasized IVF's high success rates and diagnostic value, while the con side argued for less invasive, cost-effective options. The debate highlighted the need for individualized care, with no clear consensus reached among the audience. View Fertility and Sterility at https://www.fertstert.org/ TRANSCRIPT: Welcome to Fertility and Sterility On Air, the podcast where you can stay current on the latest global research in the field of reproductive medicine. This podcast brings you an overview of this month's journal, in-depth discussion with authors, and other special features. F&S On Air is brought to you by Fertility and Sterility family of journals in conjunction with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and is hosted by Dr. Kurt Barnhart, Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Eve Feinberg, Editorial Editor, Dr. Micah Hill, Media Editor, and Dr. Pietro Bordoletto, Interactive Associate-in-Chief. I'd just like to say welcome to our third and final day of the ANZSREI conference. We've got our now traditional F&S podcast where we've got an expert panel, we've got our international speaker, Pietro, and we've got a wonderful debate ahead of us. This is all being recorded. You're welcome, and please think of questions to ask the panel at the end, because it's quite an interactive session, and we're going to get some of the best advice on some of the really controversial areas, like unexplained infertility. Hi, everyone. Welcome to the second annual Fertility and Sterility Journal Club Global, coming to you live from the Australia and New Zealand Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility meeting. I think I speak on behalf of everyone at F&S that we are so delighted to be here. Over the last two years, we've really made a concerted effort to take the podcast on the road, and this, I think, is a nice continuation of that. For the folks who are tuning in from home and listening to this podcast after the fact, the Australia and New Zealand Society for Reproductive Endocrinology is a group of over 100 certified reproductive endocrinologists across Australia and New Zealand, and this is their annual meeting live in Sydney, Australia. Today's debate is a topic that I think has vexed a lot of individuals, a lot of patients, a lot of professional groups. There's a fair amount of disagreement, and today we're going to try to unpack a little bit of unexplained infertility, and the question really is, should we be going straight to IVF? As always, we try to anchor to literature, and there are two wonderful documents in fertility and sterility that we'll be using as our guide for discussion today. The first one is a wonderful series that was published just a few months ago in the May issue, 2024, that is a views and reviews section, which means there's a series of three to five articles that kind of dig into this topic in depth. And the second article is our professional society guideline, the ASRM Committee Opinion, entitled Evidence-Based Treatments for Couples with Unexplained Infertility, a guideline. The format for today's discussion is debate style. We have a group of six experts, and I've asked them to randomly assign themselves to a pro and a con side. So I'll make the caveat here that the things that they may be saying, positions they may be trying to influence us on, are not necessarily things that they believe in their academic or clinical life, but for the purposes of a rich debate, they're going to have to be pretty deliberate in convincing us otherwise. I want to introduce my panel for today. We have on my immediate right, Dr. Raewyn Tierney. She's my co-moderator for tonight, and she's a practicing board-certified fertility specialist at IVF Australia. And on my immediate left, we have the con side. Going from left to right, Dr. Michelle Quick, practicing board-certified fertility specialist at IVF Australia. Dr. Robert LaHood, board-certified reproductive endocrinologist and clinical director of IVF Australia here in Sydney. And Dr. Clara Bothroyd, medical director at Care Fertility and the current president of the Asia Pacific Initiative in Reproduction. Welcome. On the pro side, going from right to left, I have Dr. Aurelia Liu. She is a practicing board-certified fertility specialist, medical director of Women's Health Melbourne, and clinical director at Life Fertility in Melbourne. Dr. Marcin Stankiewicz, a practicing board-certified fertility specialist and medical director at Family Fertility Centre in Adelaide. And finally, but certainly not least, the one who came with a tie this morning, Dr. Roger Hart, who is a professor of reproductive medicine at the University of Western Australia and the national medical director of City Fertility. Welcome, pro side. Thank you.  I feel naked without it. APPLAUSE I've asked both sides to prepare opening arguments. Think of this like a legal case. We want to hear from the defence, we want to hear from the plaintiffs, and I'm going to start with our pro side. I'd like to give them a few minutes to each kind of introduce their salient points for why we should be starting with IVF for patients with unexplained infertility. Thanks, Pietro. To provide a diagnosis of unexplained infertility, it's really a reflection of the degree investigation we've undertaken. I believe we all understand that unexplained infertility is diagnosed in the presence of adequate intercourse, normal semen parameters, an absence ovulatory disorder, patent fallopian tubes, and a normal detailed pelvic ultrasound examination. Now, the opposing team will try to convince you that I have not investigated the couple adequately. Personally, I'm affronted by that suggestion. But what possible causes of infertility have I not investigated? We cannot assess easily sperm fertilising capability, we cannot assess oocyte quality, oocyte fertilisation potential, embryonic development, euploidy rate, and implantation potential. Surely these causes of unexplained fertility will only become evident during an IVF cycle. As IVF is often diagnostic, it's also a therapeutic intervention. Now, I hear you cry, what about endometriosis? And I agree, what about endometriosis? Remember, we're discussing unexplained infertility here. Yes, there is very good evidence that laparoscopic treatment for symptomatic patients with endometriosis improves pelvic pain, but there is scant evidence that a diagnostic laparoscopy and treating any minor disease in the absence of pain symptoms will improve the chance of natural conception, or to that matter, improve the ultimate success of IVF. Indeed, in the absence of endometriomas, there is no negative impact on the serum AMH level in women with endometriosis who have not undergone surgery. Furthermore, there is no influence on the number of oocytes collected in an IVF cycle, the rate of embryonic aneuploidy, and the live birth rate after embryo transfer. So why put the woman through a painful, possibly expensive operation with its attendant risks as you're actually delaying her going straight to IVF? What do esteemed societies say about a diagnostic laparoscopy in the setting of unexplained infertility? The ESHRE guidelines state routine diagnostic laparoscopy is not recommended for the diagnosis of unexplained infertility. Indeed, our own ANZSREI consensus statement says that for a woman with a minimal and mild endometriosis, that the number of women needed to treat for one additional ongoing pregnancy is between 3 and 100 women with endometriosis. Is that reasonable to put an asymptomatic woman through a laparoscopy for that limited potential benefit? Now, regarding the guidelines for unexplained infertility, I agree the ASRM guidelines do not support IVF as a first-line therapy for unexplained infertility for women under 37 years of age. What they should say, and they don't, is that it is assumed that she is trying for her last child. There's no doubt if this is her last child, if it isn't her last child, sorry, she will be returning, seeking treatment, now over 37 years of age, where the guidelines do state there is good evidence that going straight to IVF may be associated with higher pregnancy rates, a shorter time to pregnancy, as opposed to other strategies. They then state it's important to note that many of these included studies were conducted in an area of low IVF success rates than those currently observed, which may alter this approach, suggesting they do not even endorse their own recommendations. The UK NICE guidelines, what do they say for unexplained infertility? Go straight to IVF. So while you're listening to my esteemed colleagues on my left speaking against the motion, I'd like to be thinking about other important factors that my colleagues on my right will discuss in more detail. Consider the superior efficacy of IVF versus IUI, the excellent safety profile of IVF and its cost-effectiveness. Further, other factors favouring a direct approach to IVF in the setting of unexplained infertility are what is the woman's desired family? We should not be focusing on her first child, we should be focusing on giving her the family that she desires and how we can minimise her inconvenience during treatment, as this has social, career and financial consequences for those impediments for her while we attempt to help her achieve her desired family. Thank you. APPLAUSE I think the young crowd would say that that was shots fired. LAUGHTER Con side? We're going to save the rebuttal for the time you've allocated to that, but first I want to put the case about unexplained infertility. Unexplained infertility in 2024 is very different to what it was 10 and 20 years ago when many of the randomised controlled trials that investigated unexplained infertility were performed. The armamentarium of investigative procedures and options that we have has changed, as indeed has our understanding of the mechanisms of infertility. So much so that that old definition of normal semen analysis, normal pelvis and ovulatory, which I think was in Roy Homburg's day, is now no longer fit for purpose as a definition of unexplained infertility. And I commend to you ICMART's very long definition of unexplained infertility, which really relies on a whole lot of things, which I'm going to now take you through what we need to do. It is said, or was said, that 30% of infertility was unexplained. I think it's way, way less than that if we actually look at our patients, both of them, carefully with history and examination and directed tests, and you will probably reduce that to about 3%. Let me take you through female age first. Now, in the old trials, some of the women recruited were as old as 42. That is not unexplained infertility. We know about oocyte aneuploidy and female ageing. 41, it's not unexplained. 40, it's not unexplained. 39, it's not unexplained. And I would put it to you that the cut-off where you start to see oocyte aneuploidy significantly constraining fertility is probably 35. So unexplained infertility has to, by definition, be a woman who is less than 35. I put that to you. Now, let's look at the male. Now, what do we know about the male, the effect of male age on fertility? We know that if the woman is over 35, and this is beautiful work that's really done many years ago in Europe, that if the woman is over 35 and the male is five years older than her, her chance of natural conception is reduced by a further 30%. So I put it to you that, therefore, the male age is relevant. And if she's 35 and has a partner who's 35 years older than her or more, it's not unexplained infertility. It's related to couple age. Now, we're going to... So that's age. Now, my colleagues are going to take you through a number of treatment interventions other than IVF, which we can do with good effect if we actually make the diagnosis and don't put them into the category of unexplained infertility. You will remember from the old trials that mild or moderate or mild or minimal endometriosis was often included, as was mild male factor or seminal fluid abnormalities. These were really multifactorial infertility, and I think that's the take-home message, that much of what we call unexplained is multifactorial. You have two minor components that act to reduce natural fecundability. So I now just want to take you through some of the diagnoses that contribute to infertility that we may not, in our routine laparoscopy and workup, we may not pick up and have previously been called unexplained infertility. For instance, we know that adenomyosis is probably one of the mechanisms by which endometriosis contributes to infertility. Chronic endometritis is now emerging as an operative factor in infertility, and that will not be diagnosed easily. Mild or minimal endometriosis, my colleagues will cover. The mid-cycle scan will lead you to the thin endometrium, which may be due to unexpected adhesive disease, but also a thin endometrium, which we know has a very adverse prognostic factor, may be due to long-term progestin contraception. We are starting to see this emerge. Secondary infertility after a caesarean section may be due to an isthma seal, and we won't recognise that unless we do mid-cycle scans. That's the female. Let's look at the male. We know now that seminal fluid analysis is not a good predictor of male fertility, and there is now evidence from Ranjith Ramasamy's work that we are missing clinical varicoceles because we failed to examine the male partner. My colleagues will talk more about that. We may miss DNA fragmentation, which again may contribute via the basic seminal fluid analysis. Now, most of these diagnoses can be made or sorted out or excluded within one or two months of your detailed assessment of both partners by history and examination. So it's not straight to IVF, ladies and gentlemen. It's just a little digression, a little lay-by, where you actually assess the patient thoroughly. She did not need a tie for that rebuttal. LAUGHTER Prasad. Thank you. Well, following from what Professor Hart has said, I'm going to show that IVF should be a go-to option because of its effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety. Now, let me first talk about the effectiveness, and as this is an interaction session, I would like to ask the audience, please, by show of hands, to show me how many of you would accept a medical treatment or buy a new incubator if it had a 94% chance of failure? Well, let the moderator please note that no hands have been raised. Thank you very much. Yet, the chance of live birth in Australian population following IUI is 6%, where, after IVF, the live birth is 40%. Almost seven times more. Now, why would we subject our patients to something we ourselves would not choose? Similarly, findings were reported from international studies that the hazard ratio of 1.25 favouring immediate IVF, and I will talk later about why it is important from a safety perspective. Cost-effectiveness. And I quote ESHRE guidelines. The costs, treatment options have not been subject to robust evaluations. Now, again, I would like to ask the audience, this time it's an easy question, how many of you would accept as standard an ongoing pregnancy rate of at least 38% for an average IVF cycle? Yeah, hands up. All right, I've got three-quarters of the room. OK. Well, I could really rest my case now, as we have good evidence that if a clinic has got an ongoing pregnancy rate of 38% or higher with IVF with single embryo transfer, then it is more effective, more cost-effective, and should be a treatment of choice. And that evidence comes from the authors that are sitting in this room. Again, what would the patients do? If the patients are paying for the treatment, would they do IUI? Most of them would actually go straight to IVF. And we also have very nice guidelines which advise against IUI based on cost-effectiveness. Another factor to mention briefly is the multiple births, which cost five to 20 times more than singleton. The neonatal cost of a twin birth costs about five times more than singletons, and pregnancy with delivery of triplets or more costs nearly 20 times. Now, the costs that I'm going to quote are in American dollars and from some time ago, from Fertility and Sterility. However, the total adjusted all healthcare costs for a single-dom delivery is about US$21,000, US$105,000 for twins, and US$400,000 for triplets and more. Then the very, very important is the psychological cost of the high risk of failure with IUI. Now, it is well established that infertility has a psychological impact on our patients. Studies have shown that prolonged time to conception extends stress, anxiety, and depression, and sexual functioning is significantly negatively impacted. Literature shows that 56% of women and 32% of men undergoing fertility treatment report significant symptoms of depression, and 76% of women and 61% of men report significant symptoms of anxiety. Shockingly, it is reported that 9.4% of women reported having suicidal thoughts or attempts. The longer the treatment takes, the more our patients display symptoms of distress, depression, and anxiety. Safety. Again, ESHRE guideline says the safety of treatment options have not been subjected to robust evaluation. But let me talk you through it. In our Australian expert hands, IVF is safe, with the risk of complications of ectopic being about 1 in 1,500 and other risks 1 in 3,000. However, let's think for a moment on impact of multiple births. A multiple pregnancy has significant psychological, physical, social, and financial consequences, which I can go further into details if required. I just want to mention that the stillbirth rate increases from under 1% for singleton pregnancies to 4.5% for twins and 8.3% for higher-order multiples, and that multiple pregnancies have potential long-term adverse health outcomes for the offspring, such as the increased risk of health issues through their life, increased learning difficulties, language delay, and attention and behavior problems. The lifelong disability is over 25% for babies weighing less than 1 kilogram at delivery. And please note that the quoted multiple pregnancy rates with IUI can reach up to 33%, although in expert hands it's usually around 15%, which is significantly higher than single embryo transfer. In conclusion, from the mother and child safety perspective, for the reason of medical efficacy and cost effectiveness, we have reasons to believe you should go straight to IVF. We're going to be doing these debates more often from Australia. This is a great panel. One side, please. Unexplained infertility. My colleagues were comparing IUI ovulation induction with IVF, but there are other ways of achieving pregnancies with unexplained fertility. I'm going to take the patient's perspective a little bit here. It's all about shared decision-making, so the patient needs to be involved in the decision-making. And it's quite clear from all the data that many patients with unexplained infertility will fall pregnant naturally by themselves even if you do nothing. So sometimes there's definitely a place in doing nothing, and the patient needs to be aware of that. So it's all about informed consent. How do we inform the patient? So we've got to make a proper diagnosis, as my colleague Dr. Boothright has already mentioned, and just to jump into IVF because it's cost-effective is not doing our patients a justice. The prognosis is really, really important, and even after 20 years of doing this, it's all about the duration of infertility, the age of the patient, and discussing that prognosis with the patient. We all know that patients who have been trying for longer and who are older do have a worse prognosis, and maybe they do need to look at treatment quicker, but there are many patients that we see that have a good prognosis, and just explaining that to them is all they need to achieve a pregnancy naturally. And then we're going to talk about other options. It's wrong not to offer those to patients, and my colleague Dr. Quick will talk about that in a moment. Look, we've all had patients that have been scarred by IVF who've spent a lot of money on IVF, did not fall pregnant, and I think the fact that they weren't informed properly, that the diagnosis wasn't made properly, is very frustrating to them. So to just jump into IVF again is not doing the patients a justice. And look, there are negatives to IVF. There's not just the cost to the patient, the cost to society. As taxpayers, we all pay for IVF. It's funded here, or sponsored to some degree, and it's also the family and everyone else that's involved in paying for this. So this is not a treatment that is without cost. There are some harms. We know that ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome still exists, even though it's much less than it used to be. There's a risk of infection and bleeding from the procedures. And we can look at the baby. The data still suggests that babies born from IVF are smaller and they're born earlier, and monozygotic twinning is more common with IVF, so these are high-risk pregnancies, and all this may have an impact on the long-term health of the babies somewhere down the track at the moment. That is important to still look out for. But I come back to the emotional toll. Our colleagues were saying that finishing infertility quicker helps to kind of reduce the emotional toll, but the procedure itself does have its own toll if it doesn't work, and so we've got to prepare patients, have them informed. But at the end of the day, it's all about patient choice. How can a patient make a choice if we don't make a proper diagnosis, give them a prognosis and offer them some other choices that exist? And running the anchor leg of the race for the pro side. IVF in couples with unexplained infertility is the best tool we have in our reproductive medicine toolkit for multiple reasons. Professor Hart has clarified the definition of unexplained infertility. As a reflection of the degree of investigation we've undertaken. He's explained that IVF is often importantly diagnostic as well as therapeutic, both demonstrating and overcoming barriers to natural conception. Dr Stankiewicz has convinced us that IVF is efficient, safe and cost-effective. My goal is to show you that IVF is the correct therapy to meet the immediate and big picture family planning goals for our patients with unexplained infertility. More than 80% of couples with defined unexplained infertility who attempt IVF treatment will have a baby. In Australia, ANZSREI data shows us that the average age of the female patients who present with primary unexplained infertility is over 35 years. And in fact the average is 38 years. We're all aware that the average age of first maternity in Australia has progressively become later over the past two decades. Currently it stands in the mothers and babies report at 32 years. If the average age of first maternity is 32 years, this means that at least 50% of women attempting their first pregnancy are over 32 years. Research I conducted in Melbourne University with my student Eugenie Pryor asking university students of their family planning intentions and aspirations demonstrated that most people, male and female, want to be parents and most want to have more than one child. However, in Australia, our most recent survey shows that births are at an all-time low, below replacement rate and falling, with an ever greater proportion of our population being unable to have the number of children they aspire to and an ever growing proportion seeking assisted reproductive care. Fertility declines with age. Factors include egg quality concerns, sperm quality concerns and the accumulation of pathologies over time. Adenomyosis, fibroids, endometriosis are concerns that no person is born with. They exist on a spectrum and progress over time and may be contributing factors for unexplained infertility. Our patients, when we meet them, are the best IVF candidates that they will ever be. They are the youngest they will ever be and they have the best ovarian reserve they will ever have. They will generate more euploid embryos now than they will in years to come. The sooner we get our patients pregnant, the sooner they will give birth. It takes nine months to have a baby, 12 months potentially to breastfeed and wean and of course most patients will need time to care for a young infant and recover prior to attempting another pregnancy. IVF and embryo banking may represent not only their best chance of conception with reduced time to pregnancy but also an opportunity for embryo banking to improve their cumulative live birth rate potential over time. By the time our 38-year-old patient returns to try to conceive for a second child, she will undoubtedly be aged over 40. Her chance of live birth per cycle initiated at IVF at this stage has reduced phenomenally. The ANZSREI dataset from our most recent report quotes that statistic to be 5%. Her chance of conception with an embryo frozen at 38 years, conversely, is one in three to one in four. There is no room for doubt that IVF gives couples with unexplained infertility not only the most effective treatment we have to help them have a baby, but their best opportunity to have a family. Last but certainly not least, Dr. Quick, to round out the con sides arguments before we open up for rebuttal. And I'll make a small plea that if you have questions that you'd like to pose directly to the panel, prepare them and we'll make sure we get to them from the audience shortly. Thank you. So, whilst we have heard that we may be bad doctors because we're delaying our patients' time to pregnancy, I would perhaps put it to you that unexplained infertility is a diagnosis which is made based on exclusion. So perhaps you are the bad doctors because you haven't looked hard enough for the cause of the unexplained infertility. So, in terms of the tests that we all would do, I think, we would all ensure that the woman has an ovarian reserve. We would all ensure that she has no structural anomaly inside the uterus. We would all ensure that her tubes are patent. We would all ensure that she has regular cycles. We would ensure that he has a normal semen analysis. I think these are tests that we would all do when trying to evaluate a couple for fertility who are struggling to conceive. And therefore, the chance of them getting pregnant naturally, it's never going to be zero. And one option therefore, instead of running straight to IVF, would be to say, OK, continue timed intercourse because the chance of you conceiving naturally is not actually zero and this would be the most natural way to conceive, the cheapest way to conceive, the least interventional way to conceive. And whether that be with cycle tracking to ensure appropriate timed intercourse, whether that be with cycle tracking to ensure adequate luteal phase support. When you clear the fallopian tubes, we know that there are studies showing an improvement in natural conception. Lipidol or oil-based tubal flushing techniques may also help couples to conceive naturally. And then you don't have this multiple pregnancy rate that IVF has. You don't have the cost that you incur with IVF, not just for the couple but to Australian society because IVF is subsidised in this country. You don't have the risks that the woman goes through to undergo IVF treatment. You don't have the risks that the baby takes on being conceived via IVF. And so conceiving naturally, because it's not going to be zero, is definitely an option for these couples. In terms of further tests or further investigations that you could do, some people would argue, yes, we haven't looked hard enough for the reason for infertility, therefore we know that ultrasound is notoriously bad at picking up superficial endometriosis. We know that ultrasound cannot pick up subtle changes in the endometrium, as Dr Boothroyd referred to chronic endometritis, for example. So these patients perhaps should undergo a hysteroscopy to see if there is an endometrial issue. Perhaps these patients should undergo a laparoscopy to see if there is superficial endometriosis. And there are meta-analyses showing that resecting or treating superficial endometriosis may actually help these couples conceive naturally down the track and then therefore they avoid having more interventional treatment in order to conceive. There is also intrauterine insemination with or without ovarian stimulation, which may improve their chances of conceiving naturally. And that again would be less invasive, less intervention and cheaper for the patient. And we know that therefore there are a lot of other treatment options available to help these couples to conceive. And if it's less invasive, it's more natural, it's cheaper, that ends up being better for the patient. Psychologically as well, which the other side have brought up, even with Dr Stankiewicz's 38% ongoing pregnancy rate, that also means that 62% of his patients are not going to be pregnant. The psychological impact of that cannot be underestimated because for a lot of patients, IVF is your last resort. And when you don't get pregnant with IVF, that creates an issue too for them. Embryo banking, which was also brought up, what happens when you create surplus embryos and what's the psychological impact of having to deal with embryos that you are then not going to use in the future? So therefore for those reasons we feel that IVF is not your first line treatment for couples who are diagnosed with unexplained infertility. There are many other ways to help these couples to conceive. We just have a multitude of things to unpack. And I want to start off by opening up an opportunity for rebuttal. I saw both sides of the panel here taking diligent notes. I think all of us have a full page worth of things that kind of stood out to us. Since the pro side had an opportunity to begin, I'm actually going to start with the con side and allow the con side to answer specific points made by the pro side and provide just a little bit more detail and clarity for why they think IVF is not the way forward. My learned first speaker, wearing his tie of course, indicated that it was all about laparoscopy and IUI, and it's way more than that. I just want to highlight to you the paper by Dressler in 2017 in the New England Journal of Medicine, a randomised controlled trial of what would be unexplained infertility according to the definition I put out, the less than 35 ovulatory normal semen analysis. And the intervention was an HSG with either oil-based contrast or water-based contrast. And over the six months, there was clear separation, and this is an effective treatment for unexplained infertility or mild or minimal endometriosis, however it might work. And there's probably separation out to three years. So as a single intervention, as an alternative to IVF, the use of oil-based contrast is an option. So it's not just about laparoscopy and IUI. I guess the other thing the second speaker did allude to, fairly abysmal success rates with IUI being 6%. That is a problem, and I would like to allude to a very good pragmatic trial conducted by Cindy Farquhar and Emily Lu and their co-workers in New Zealand that really swung the meta-analysis for the use of clomiphene and IUI to clinical efficacy. And they reported a 33% chance of live birth in their IUI and clomiphene arm. I'm going across to Auckland to see what the magic is in that city. What are they doing? The third speaker did allude to the problem of declining fertility, a global problem, and Australia is not alone. We have solved the problem to date, which we've had for 40 years, with immigration. But Georgina Chambers' work shows beautifully that IVF is not the answer to the falling fertility rates. It is a way more complex social problem and is probably outside the scope of today's discussion. So those are my three rebuttals to our wonderful team. Thank you very much. So... You can't bury them. We'll give them an opportunity. Thank you for the opportunity. So I'd like to address some of the points that my learned debaters on the opposition raised. The first speaker really suggested quite a few things that we probably omitted, like endometritis, failing to examine the male. I think things like that... I think, at a good history, that is essential what we do as part of our investigation. We're looking for a history of cesarean section, complications subsequent to that. We're doing a detailed scan, and that will exclude the fact that she's got a poor endometrium development, she's got a cesarean scar niche. A good history of a male will allude to the fact that he has some metabolic disorder, degree of hypogonadism. So we're not delaying anything by these appropriate investigations. Adenomyosis will be raised. I talked about a detailed gynaecological examination. So I honestly think that a very... As my opening line was, a detailed gynaecological scan, obviously with a very good history taken, is essential. We're not delaying her opportunity to go straight to IVF if we've addressed all these factors. The second speaker talked about shared decision-making, and we'd all completely agree with that. But we have to be honest and open about the success, which my second speaker talked about, the success of the treatment we're offering. And one thing we should sort of dwell on is it's all... It's a fundamental description of the success of treatment is probably all about prognostic models, and that who not model, that's the original model about the success of conception, is really... Everything flows on from that, which basically talks about a good prognosis patient. 30% chance of live birth after a year. That's what they talk about, a good prognosis patient. Perhaps the rest of the world is different to your average Australian patient, but if we talked about that being a good prognosis, you've got a one in three chance of being pregnant by a year. I think most of our patients would throttle us. So that is what all the models are sort of based on, that being a good prognosis patient. So I completely agree with the second speaker that we do have a shared decision. We have to be honest with our patients about the success. We have to be honest about giving them the prognosis of any treatment that we offer. But really, as my third speaker was talking about, it's about giving the patient the opportunity to have a family, minimal career disruption, minimal life disruption. We have to be honest and talk about the whole picture. They're focused on the first child because really they can't think beyond that. We're talking about giving them the family that they need. The third speaker spoke very eloquently about the risks associated with the treatment we offer. I believe we offer a very safe service with our IVF, particularly in Australia, with our 2% twin pregnancy rate. We talk about the higher risk of these pregnancies, but they perhaps don't relate to the treatment we're offering. Perhaps, unfortunately, is the patient, if she's got polycystic ovary syndrome, if she's more likely to have diabetes, premature delivery, preeclampsia. So I think often the risks associated with IVF and potentially the risks associated to the child born from IVF perhaps don't relate to the treatment of IVF per se. It may well be the woman and perhaps her partner, their underlying medical condition, which lead those risks. So I strongly would encourage you to believe that you take a very good history from your patient, you do a thorough investigation, as I've alluded to, looking for any signs of ovulatory disorder, any gynaecological disorder by a detailed scan, checking tubal patency and a detailed history and the similarities from the man, and then you'll find you're probably going straight to IVF. APPLAUSE I'd like to talk a bit about the embryo banking and having been in this field for a long time, as a word of caution, we're setting a lot of expectations. I remember going to an ASRM meeting probably 10 years ago where they had this headline, all your embryos in the freezer, your whole family in the freezer, basically expecting that if you get four or five embryos frozen that you'll end up with a family at the end. We all know that for the patient, they're not a percentage, it's either zero or 100%. And if all the embryos don't work, they don't have a family at the end, you know, it didn't work for them and their expectations haven't been met. And the way we talk about the percentages and that we can solve the patient's problems, that we can make families, it doesn't always happen. So the expectations our position is setting here, we're not always able to meet and so we're going to end up with very unhappy patients. So this is just a warning to everyone that we need to tell people that this doesn't always work and sometimes they'll end up with no success at all. And from that point of view, I think the way it's presented is way too simplistic and we've got to go back to looking at the other options and not promising things we can't always deliver. So just taking into account all our esteemed interlocutors have said, we don't necessarily disagree with the amount of investigations that they described because nowhere in our argument we said that as soon as the patient registers with the receptionist, they will direct it to an IVF lab. I think to imply so, we'd be very rich indeed. Maybe there are some clinics that are so efficient. I don't know how it works overseas, but certainly not in Australia. The other point that was made about the cost of IVF and our, again, esteemed interlocutors are very well aware from the studies done here in Australia that actually every baby that we have to conceive through IVF and create and lives is actually more than 10 to 100 times return on investment because we are creating future taxpayers. We are creating people that will repay the IVF treatment costs over and over and over again. So I'll put to you, Rob, that if you are saying that we can't do IVF because it costs money, you are robbing future treasurers of a huge amount of dollars. I hope the American audience is listening. In America, we call embryos unborn children in freezers in certain parts and here they're unborn taxpayers. Con side, final opportunity for rebuttal before some audience questions and one more word from the pro side. Well, actually, Dr Stankiewicz was very happy to hear that you're not going to send your patients straight to the IVF lab because we've managed to convince you that that's not the right thing to do. I clearly have forgotten how to debate because I did all my rebuttals at the end of my presentation but essentially I'll recap because when we're talking about IVF, as we're saying, the chance of pregnancy is not going to be 100% and so there is a psychological impact to IVF not working. There is a psychological impact to banking embryos and creating surplus embryos that eventually may not be used and they were my main rebuttal points in terms of why IVF was not the first-line treatment. Thank you. So we've heard from the opposition some very valid points of how our patients can be psychologically impacted when fertility treatment is unsuccessful. I will again remind you that IVF is the most successful fertility treatment we have in our treatment armoury. We are most likely to help our patients have a baby with IVF. The cumulative pregnancy rates for IVF have started back in the late 70s and early 80s in single-digit percentages. We now, with a best prognosis candidate, have at least a one-in-two chance of that patient having a baby per embryo transfer and in our patients with unexplained infertility, the vast majority of our patients will have success. We also heard from the negative team about the significant chance of pregnancy in patients with expectant management. You're right, there's not a 0% chance of natural conception in patients who have unexplained infertility, but there is a not very good chance. We know from data that we've had for a really long time, going back as far as the Hutterite data, to today's non-contradictory models, which tell us that a couple's chance of conception per month in best prognosis candidates is one in five. If they've been trying for six months, it's one in ten. If they've been trying for 12 months, it's only 5%, and if they've been trying for 24 months, it's less than 1%. So it may not be zero, but it isn't very good. In terms of our team reminding us of the extended ICMART definition of unexplained infertility, we don't argue. When we say someone has unexplained infertility, we make the assumption that they have been comprehensively diagnosed by a robust reproductive endocrinologist, as everyone in this room is. And I would say one closing rebuttal. IUI success rates have been the same for the last 50 years, whereas IVF success rates continue to improve. Why would you offer your patient a treatment from 50 years ago when you can offer them one from today? Thank you. APPLAUSE I'm going to take a personal privilege and ask the first question, in hoping that the microphone makes its way to the second question in the audience. My colleagues on the pro side have said IVF, IVF, IVF. Can you be a little bit more specific about what kind of IVF? Do you mean IVF with ICSI? Do you mean IVF, ICSI, and PGT? Be a little bit more deliberate for us and tell us exactly how the patient with unexplained infertility should receive IVF. As I said in my statement, I think it's a diagnostic evaluation. I think there is an argument to consider ICSI, but I think ICSI does have some negative consequences for children born. I think perhaps going straight to ICSI is too much. I think going straight to PGTA perhaps is too much, unless there is something in their history which should indicate that. But we're talking about unexplained infertility. So I believe a standard IVF cycle, looking at the opportunity to assess embryonic development, is the way to go. I do not think you should be going straight to ICSI. I think the principle of first do no harm is probably a safe approach. I don't know whether my colleagues have some other comments, but I think that would be the first approach rather than going all guns blazing. I can understand, though, in different settings in the world, there may have... We're very fortunate in Australia, we're very well supported from the government support for IVF, but I think the imperatives in different countries may be different. But I think that approach would be the right one first. We'll start with a question from the audience. And if you could introduce yourself and have the question allowed for our members in the audience who are not here. It's Louise Hull here from Adelaide. The question I would like to put to both the pro and con team is that Geeta Mishra from the University of Queensland showed that if you had diagnosed endometriosis before IVF, you were more likely to have a pregnancy and much less likely to have high-order IVF cycles. Given that we now have really good non-invasive diagnostics, we're actually... A lot of the time we can pick up superficial or stage 2 endometriosis if you get the right scan. We're going to do IVF better if we know about it. Can you comment on that impacting even the diagnosis of unexplained infertility? Thanks. I'd love to take that. Can I go first, Roger? LAUGHTER Please do. Look, I'd love to take that question. It's a really good question. And, of course, this is not unexplained infertility, so this is outside the scope here. And I think, really, what we're seeing now, in contrast to where we were at the time of the Markku study, which was all... And the Tulandy study on endometrioma excision, we now see that that is actually damaging to fertility, particularly where there is ovarian endometriosis, and that we compromise their ovarian reserve by doing this surgery before we preserve their fertility, be it oocyte cryopreservation or embryo cryopreservation. So I think it's a bit outside the scope of this talk, but I think the swing of the data now is that we should be doing fertility preservation before we do surgery for deeply infiltrated ovarian endometriosis. And that would fit with Gita's findings. A brief response. Thanks very much, Louise. Yeah, we're talking about unexplained infertility here, and my opening line was we need a history, but a detailed gynaecological ultrasound. I think it's important it's a really good ultrasound to exclude that, because the evidence around very minor endometriosis is not there. I agree with significant endometriosis, but that's not the subject of this discussion. But I do believe with very minimal endometriosis there is really no evidence for that. Janelle MacDonald from Sydney. I'm going to play devil's advocate here. So everyone is probably aware of the recent government inquiry about obstetric violence. I'm a little concerned that if we are perceived to be encouraging women to IVF first, are we guilty as a profession of performing fertility violence? That's just digressing a little bit, just thinking about how the consumers may perceive this. I think our patients want to have a baby, and that's why they come to see us, and that's what we help them to do through IVF. I'm not sure the microphone's working. And just introduce yourself. I'm from Sydney, Australia. Can I disagree with you, Roger, about that question about minimal and mild endometriosis? I'm 68, so I'm old enough to have read a whole lot of papers in the past that are probably seen as relics. But Mark Khoo published an unusual study, because it was actually an RCT. Well, sorry, not an RCT. It was a study whereby... Well, it was an RCT, and it was randomised really well. It was done in Canada, and there were about 350 subjects, and they were identified to have stage 1 or stage 2 endometriosis at laparoscopy. And the interesting thing is it was seen as an intervention which didn't greatly increase the chance of conception, but it doubled the monthly chance of conception. So there was clearly a difference between those patients who didn't have endometriosis and those that had stage 1 and stage 2 endometriosis. So the intervention did actually result in an improvement. One of the quotes was, well, I heard since then, well, it didn't make much difference. But when you realise that infertility is multifactorial, there were probably other factors involved as well. So any increase like that in stage 1 and stage 2 endometriosis sufferers was clearly beneficial for them. So I wouldn't disagree with you completely, but I do think you've got to take it on board that there is some evidence that surgical intervention can help. And certainly in those patients whereby the financial costs of IVF are still quite, even in Australia, astronomical. Many patients can get this through the public sector or the private sector treatment of their endometriosis laparoscopically very cheaply or at no cost. Thanks, Dr Persson. So you're right that there was also a counter-randomised controlled trial by the Grupo Italiano which was a counter to that. And actually did not show any benefit. But I believe the Marcu study demonstrated an excess of conception and with treatment of minima and endometriosis of about 4% per month for a few months. So absolutely, that shared decision-making. Personally, I wouldn't like a laparoscopy to give me an extra 4% chance of a natural conception for four months, which I think the data was. So basically, the basis to my statement that I said without going into great detail was a review article published by Samy Glarner recently in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. And their conclusions were what I basically said, that from looking at all the data, there is no real evidence of intervention for minor endometriosis. We're not talking about pain or significant diagnosed endometriosis on the outcomes of IVF, ovarian reserve, egg quality, embryo development, and euploidy rate. So that was the basis of my... I hate to disagree... I hate to agree with my opponents in a debate, but I'm going to... But there is actually a new network analysis by Rui Wang and some serious heavyweights in evidence-based medicine that pulls together the surgical studies. And the thing that made the most difference to this of mild and minimal endometriosis from a fertility point of view, not pain, is the use of oil-based uterine contrast. And I commend that paper to you, which fits with exactly what Roger is saying. Hi, my name's Lucy Prentice.  I work in Auckland. And I just wanted to point out the New Zealand perspective a little bit. Where we come from a country with very limited public funding for IVF. I'm currently running an RCT with Cindy Farquad directly looking at IVF versus IUI for unexplained infertility. And I'd just like to point out that both the ASRM and ESHRE guidelines, which are the most recent ones, both suggest that IUI should be a first-line treatment with oral ovarian stimulation. We have no evidence that IVF is superior based on an IPD meta-analysis published very recently and also a Cochrane review. And although we would love to be able to complete the family that our patients want from IVF and embryo banking, that option is really not available to a lot of people in New Zealand because of prohibitive costs. We know that IUI with ovarian stimulation is a very effective treatment for people with poor prognosis and unexplained infertility. And I also would just like to add that there's not a cost-effectiveness analysis that shows an improvement in cost-effectiveness for IVF. There's also never been a study looking at treatment tolerability between the two, so I don't think that you can say that IVF is a treatment that people prefer over IUI. So I may turn around and shoot myself in the foot based on our results that will be coming out next year, but I think at the moment I don't think you can say that IVF is better than IUI with ovarian stimulation for unexplained. We have time for two more questions from the audience, and we have two hands in the back. Now we can. It's the light green. OK. Hossam Zini from Melbourne. Thank you very much for the debate. It's very interesting. The problem is that all of the studies that have been done about comparing IUI to IVF, they are not head-to-head studies. The designs are different. They are having, like, algorithmic approach. For example, they compare three or four or five cycles of IUI to one cycle of IVF. But about 10 years ago, our group at the Royal Women's Hospital, we have done a study, a randomized control study, to compare IUI to IVF head-to-head, and we randomized the patients at the time of the trigger who only developed, so we did a low stimulation to get two to three follicles only, and that's why it was so hard to recruit lots of patients. So the criticism that was given to the study that it's a small sample size, but we end up with having IVF as a cost-effective treatment. Our IVF group had a live birth rate about 38%, and on the IUI, 12%. And with our cost calculations, we find out that the IVF is much more cost-effective than the IUI. But I believe that we all now believe in individualized kind of treatment, so patients probably who are younger than 34 years old probably wouldn't go straight to IVF. Maybe I'll do a laparoscopy and a histroscopy first, okay, and we may give them a chance to achieve a natural conception in the next three months or so. Patients who are older than 35, 37 years old probably will benefit straight from IVF. But again, in day-to-day life cases, we will not force the patient to go straight to IVF. I will talk to her and I'll tell her, these are your options, expectant treatment. This is the percentage that you would expect. IUI, this is what you expect. IUI with ovulation induction, this is what you expect. IVF, this is what you expect. And then she will discuss that with her partner and come back to me and tell me what she wants to do. Thanks. I saw a hand show up right next to you, so I'll add one more question given our time limitation. Thanks so much, Kate Stone-Mellon. I'd like to ask our panel to take themselves out of their role playing and put themselves in another role where they were the head of a very, very well-funded public service, and I'd like to ask the two sides what they really think about what they would do with a patient at the age of 35 with 12 months of unexplained infertility. Well, can I say that? Because that's my role in a different hat. LAUGHTER So, yeah, I run the state facility service in Western Australia. We looked at the data, because obviously that's what we're doing, IUI, IVF, and unfortunately we stopped doing IUI treatment. The success rate was so low. So we do go straight to IVF with unexplained infertility. Disappointing, as I'm sure you hear that, Kate, that we do. We looked at the data. Yeah, I think that I would still offer the patients the options, because some people don't want to do IVF. Even though it's completely free, they may not still want to do the injections and the procedure and take on the risks of the actual egg collection procedure. I don't know, religious issues with creating embryos. Yeah, I would still give patients the option. We have time for one more question in the back. We'll take the other ones offline afterwards. We'll get you a microphone just to make sure our listeners afterwards can listen. Following on from the New Zealand experience, which I've experienced... Hello? Yeah. From the New Zealand experience, and having worked here extensively and in New Zealand, you're not comparing apples with apples, Claire. That unexplained couple in New Zealand will wait five years to get funding and currently perhaps another two years to get any treatment. That's then an apples group compared to the pilot group who may, in fact, walk past the hospital and get treatment. The other thing about this, I think, that we need to forget, or don't forget, is the ethics of things here, two of which is that the whole understanding of unexplained infertility needs research and thinking. And if it wasn't for that understanding of what is the natural history of normal and then the understanding of pathology, we wouldn't do a lot of things in medicine. So if we have got a subgroup here that's unexplained, it's not just to the patient, we have a responsibility to future patients and ourselves to be honest and do research and learn about these factors. Now, it doesn't answer the debate, but it is something that's what drives the investigation and management of unexplained delay. And, for example, at the moment, there's quite a discussion about two issues of ethics, one about the involuntary childlessness of people that don't get to see us but don't have those children that they wanted to have because they didn't want to undergo treatment, or it was the involuntary childlessness of a second or subsequent child. And that's quite a big research issue in Europe, I realise, at the moment. And the final thing is about the information giving. The British case Montgomery 2015 has changed consent substantially, for those of you from England, that all information given to patients must include and document the discussion about expectant management versus all the different types of treatment, for and against and risks. And we're not currently doing that in IVF in this area, but if you read about what's happened in England, it's transformed consent in surgery. And I think a lot of our decision-making isn't in that way. So there are a couple of ethical principles to think about. Wonderful questions from the audience. Since we're coming up at the end of our time, we typically end the debate with closing remarks, but we'll forego that for this debate. And I'd actually like to just poll the audience. After hearing both the pro and the con side's arguments, by a show of hands, who in the audience believes that for the patient with unexplained infertility, as defined and detailed here broadly, should we be beginning with IVF? Should we be going straight to IVF? So by a show of hands. And I would say probably 50% of the room raised their hand. And those who think we should not be going straight to IVF? It feels like a little bit more. 40-60, now that I saw the other hands. Well, I'm going to call this a hung jury. I don't know that we have a definitive answer. Please join me in a round of applause for our panelists. In America, we would call that election interference. I wanted to thank our panelists, our live audience, and the listeners of the podcast. On behalf of Fertility and Sterility, thank you for the invitation to be here at your meeting and hosting this debate live from the Australian New Zealand Society for Reproductive Endocrinology meeting in Sydney, Australia. Thank you. This concludes our episode of Fertility and Sterility On Air, brought to you by the Fertility and Sterility family of journals in conjunction with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. This podcast was developed by Fertility and Sterility and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine as an educational resource and service to its members and other practicing clinicians. While the podcast reflects the views of the authors and the hosts, it is not intended to be the only approved standard of living or to direct an exclusive course of treatment. The opinions expressed are those of the discussants and do not reflect Fertility and Sterility or the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.    

Dr Shane is joined by co-hosts Drs Susi and Linden. In science news global temperatures, plastic recycling and nerd night and the earths's core.Jessica Macha from The Monash Ice Sheet Initiative talks about the Antarctic ice sheet; and Dr. Kimberley Callaghan from Melbourne University talks about combining chemistry and DNA and modern science careers.Program page: Einstein-A-Go-GoFacebook page: Einstein-A-Go-GoX: Einstein-A-Go-Go

Get the full show notes here: https://antiaginghacks.net/podcast/walter-gjergja-shaolin-monk/ Shaolin Temple secular monk Walter Gjergja – is a Shaolin Master, philosopher, advisor, strategist, co-founder, coach, speaker and author. Born into a modest background, in a small village on the foothills of the Italian Alps, he embarked on a remarkable journey of personal and academic growth that culminated with studying in Australia (La Trobe and Melbourne University) and China (Shaolin Temple), co-founding multiple educational projects and wellness companies, conducting diverse activities internationally (News & Press) whilst - currently - living in Switzerland. Here are our topics of discussion: [03:18] Brief Overview of Shaolin Culture and Origins [5:39] Your Experience with Shaolin, Kung Fu Training, and Its Impact on Your Life [8:04] Blending Ancient Wisdom with Modern Science [10:24] Shaolin's Perspective on Life's Length vs. Quality [12:57] Building a Positive Mindset Daily [18:16] How do you use practices like meditation and mindfulness to counter negative programming? [21:52] Is exercise the main way to build a healthy body for a long life, or are there other practical methods you've found? [24:14] Can you shed light on the ideal training mix, how to train, and common mistakes people make with under-training or over-training? [28:59] How can people develop a quiet clarity of mind to make better decisions in life? [31:46] What daily practices can people incorporate into their busy lives to apply these learnings? [35:03] What does a day in the life of a Shaolin master look like? [37:08] Where can people learn more about you?

Students have been affected by significant changes to student and graduate visas under Australia's immigration policies. Melbourne University students say they came to Australia with high expectations, but in reality they struggle with the rising cost of living, job search, and housing difficulties. - オーストラリアの移民抑制のため、学生ビザと卒業ビザに大幅な変更があり、学生は影響を受けています。また生活費の高騰、仕事探し、そして家探しも、学生を悩ませています。オーストラリアに期待を抱いてやって来たものの、実際にはギャップを感じているとメルボルン大学の学生は語ります。

The future of human potential and performance. In it we cover the quest to be superhuman, making biological enhancement mainstream, cyborg athletes, human longevity, and endeavoring to build the biggest sporting spectacle the world has ever seen. Aron D'Souza is the Co-founder and President of the Enhanced Games. This new model of the Olympic Games places performance-enhancing drugs and genetic modifiers front and center. The Games strive to showcase humanity's unbounded potential by embracing scientific innovations and breakthroughs. In an era of accelerating technological and scientific change, they believe the world needs a sporting event that embraces the future, particularly advances in medical science. By doing so, they promise to give us all a glimpse of what the future of human performance could look like. Set to debut in 2025, the Games have the deep-pocketed support of some of the most successful and polarizing technologists and investors, including PayPal founder Peter Thiel and Balaji Srinivasan, the futurist and former CTO of Coinbase, as well as an upcoming documentary series by Ridley Scott. Prior to the Enhanced Games, Aron founded Sargon, a technology infrastructure company for the pensions and superannuation industry across the Asia-Pacific region. Now owned by Vista Equity, Sargon has 200 employees and nine offices. Aron, the author of three books, studied law at both Melbourne University and Oxford. Sign up for new podcasts and our newsletter, and email me on danieldarling@focal.vcSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dr. Sarah White is the CEO of Jean Hailes for Women's Health, a national not-for-profit organization dedicated to improving women's health across Australia through every life stage. She is part of the National Women's Health Advisory Council and the Women's Health Products Working Group at Australia's Medicines Regulator. She's an honorary research fellow at Melbourne University and still an active researcher. We had an impassioned conversation about how menopause narratives are being manipulated, the likely reasons for that, and how women can get the reliable information they need. We talk about: - Sarah's career journey  - The importance of accurate and accessible health information - Who Dr Jean Hailes was - The first rigorous survey on how menopause affects Australian women - How menopause data is being manipulated and why - The impact of industry influence on women's health - Reframing menopause from a strengths-based approach - Combating gendered ageism - The influence of marketing and misinformation - The pressure to maintain a youthful appearance - The commercial drivers behind the promotion of HRT - Questioning what's being said, by whom and why - Considering lifestyle changes in the menopause toolbox - Research on public health priorities and health inequities And more! This is such an important conversation for anyone interested in menopause! If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe, share it and leave us a 5* review on iTunes or wherever you're listening. Order the ebook or audiobook (narrated by Rachel) versions of Rachel's book, Magnificent Midlife: Transform Your Middle Years, Menopause And Beyond at magnificentmidlife.com/book The paperback can be purchased on Amazon or other online retailers: UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Magnificent-Midlife-Transform-Middle-Menopause/dp/173981150X/ US & Canada: https://www.amazon.com/Magnificent-Midlife-Transform-Middle-Menopause/dp/173981150X/ Australia: https://www.amazon.com.au/Magnificent-Midlife-Transform-Middle-Menopause/dp/173981150X/ You can listen to all the other episodes and get the show notes at magnificentmidlife.com/podcast. Recommended by the Sunday Times. Feedspot #3 in best midlife podcasts and #14 in best women over 50 podcasts worldwide. You'll find lots of strategies, support, and resources to help make your midlife magnificent at magnificentmidlife.com. Check out Rachel's online Revitalize Experience, a 6-week intensive small group mentoring experience or 1-1 Midlife Mentoring.

GUEST 1 OVERVIEW: Fr Jason Charron is Pastor, Holy Trinity Ukrainian Catholic Church in Carnegie, Pennsylvania. On the day of the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, Fr Charron met briefly with Trump and gave a benediction during former president Donald Trump's rally before Trump spoke and then, on his way out that same afternoon remarked to a group of rally goers that they should also pray for Trump QUOTE "because there are people who want to kill him". Just a few minutes later a gunman opened fire on Trump.    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QcGRzLiuKg   GUEST 2 OVERVIEW: Dr Nataliya Ilyushina is a Research Fellow (Advanced) at the RMIT Blockchain Innovation Hub. She received her PhD in Economics from RMIT University. Her other qualifications include Master of Economics from Melbourne University, double degree Master of Professional Accounting, Master of Commerce from RMIT University and Bachelor of Economics from Moscow State University. X: @DrIlyushina

CLIMATE  ACTION  SHOW (Rpt)July 29th 2024Produced by Vivien Langford ROSS GARNAUT -  SUPERPOWER  TRANSFORMATIONKAY WENNAGEL  - ELECTRIC VEHICLE BULK BUY Guests ROSS GARNAUT -  Professor Emeritus in  Economics at Melbourne University. His recent book isThe Superpower Transformation  - Making Australia's Zero Carbon Future.https://www.blackincbooks.com.au/books/superpower-transformation(link is external)Ross sees two disruptive events in 2022. The election of the ALP in Australia and the disruption of oil and gas exports to Europe after Russia invaded Ukraine. He says "Europe hesitated then COMMITTED decisively to the new economy" Will Australia make the same committment?We talked about :Regional transformations, such as making agricultural UREA with green hydrogen instead of importing 92% from countries where it is produced using coal  or gas as feedstock. Industrial Transformations, such  as helping China lower its costs of decarbonisation by producing GREEN STEEL here with local iron ore. Methane Transformations by stopping subsidies to new coal and gas projects and mandating the strict prevention of FUGITIVE METHANE EMISSIONS from leaky pipes and mines. A more thorny problem for us, if we want to manufacture zero carbon goods with our superpower resources of wind and solar energy,  is how to extract the TRANSITION MINERALS  here and abroad without riding rough shod over precious ecosystems and sacred places? Ross argues that they are essential for  zero carbon modern medicine and modern life but as a quarry nation we have a huge responsibiliy NOT to continue extracting here and overseas in a damaging way. We did not discuss the alternatives of a post extractivist, steady state economics but we welcome any contributions next year to discuss this VITAL matter. Ross talks about the recent savaging of training for geophysics and mettalurgy specialists. Australia  once had a proud reputation in this field but more money now  goes to moon research  than to manage the use of the transition minerals so much in demand! He says the jobs summit made some headway but a lot more needs to be done to protect the environment and  insists that engaging  indigenous people at the forefront of these transformations is essential.https://www.neweconomy.org.au/nena-hubs/sector/post-extractivism/https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/inline-files/Jobs-and-Skills...    KAY WENNAGEL - interviewed by Michael Staindl.https://smartenergy.org.au/industry-directory/the-good-car-company/The Good Car Company is a social enterprise dedicated to decarbonising transport and has been working with community groups and local councils across Australia to accelerate the take-up of affordable electric cars through community bulk buys. Australia wide+61 361214624www.goodcar.co  MUSIC - The coal owner and the Pittman's wife sung by Robert Farmer This ballad is believed to date from the Durham strike of 1844 and to have been written by William Hornsby, a collier of Shotton Moor, Durham. The ballad was discovered among a collection of papers relating to the strike by a studious Lancashire miner, J.S. Bell. The tune was supplied by J. Dennison, of Walker and, together with the text, can be found in A.L. Lloyd's Come All Ye Bold Miners(link is external).A challenge to listeners to send us the ballads of Green Extractivism - the songs of the species. Contact us at Radio 3CR - (03 ) 94198377

Indigenous business and home ownership is on an upward trajectory. The role played by Indigenous owned and operated businesses in Australia's economy has expanded, contributing over $16 billion to the economy, and over $4.2 billion in wages. And Indigenous Business Australia has helped tens of thousands purchase their own home.  No mean feat during this cost of living crisis.Laura Thompson, Co-Founder, Clothing the GapMichelle Evans, Director of the Dilin Duwa Centre for Indigenous Business Leadership at Melbourne University and Melbourne Business School Kelly Keane, Associate Director, Indigenous Business Australia

The world watched as earlier this year footage of students across the world mobilised to protest against Israel's ongoing killing of defenceless Palestinian citizens, particularly children. Longstanding encampments were established at university campuses across America and here in Australia, popping up across Sydney, Adelaide, Brisbane and Melbourne. Students at Melbourne University staged a sit-in and encampment in a campus building, refusing to leave until university leadership agreed it would disclose any links to weapons manufacturers who may be providing weapons being used by the Israeli Defence Force. Since the sit-in's end, students who participated have reported being asked to attend disciplinary hearings for their conduct during the protests, with WiFi data and CCTV footage of them on campus being used as evidence of their participation.  Kareem Zaghlool is a postgraduate medical student nearing the end of his degree and Zara Chauvin Cunningham is a second-year science student and is also Jewish. In this exclusive episode of The Briefing, Antoinette Lattouf sits down with the two students to find out how they feel about being tracked and spied on, despite the university pledging it wouldn't use tech to track them. The Briefing contacted the Victorian Information Commissioner and the University of Melbourne for comment for this story, who provided the following statements: Sean Morrison, Victorian Information Commissioner: “The OVIC is making preliminary enquiries with University of Melbourne regarding this matter. This information will assist OVIC in assessing whether or not an investigation proceeds. It would not be appropriate for OVIC to provide further comment given the preliminary nature of its involvement. OVIC is unlikely to comment on where matters do not proceed from a preliminary inquiry to an investigation.” A University of Melbourne spokesperson said:   “The University is currently progressing a range of matters in relation to student conduct. We will not be commenting on individual matters, in line with our confidentiality requirements and our commitment to procedural fairness under University policy.  The University is in direct communication with individuals as required in relation to these matters.”   Regarding peaceful protests, Professor Nicola Phillips, Provost said:  “Freedom of speech is foundational to our values and policies at the University of Melbourne. We have consistently stated that we recognise the right of students and staff to participate in peaceful protest.”    Headlines: Further pressure for Biden to drop out of presidential race Meth, cocaine and nicotine at record highs around Australia De Minaur pulls out of Wimbledon, with Olympics now uncertain  Kirsha Kaechele reveals the MONA Picasso's are fakes painted by her  Follow The Briefing:TikTok: @listnrnewsroomInstagram: @listnrnewsroom @thebriefingpodcast YouTube: @LiSTNRnewsroomFacebook: @LiSTNR Newsroom  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A reality revealed, 90s Manchester psychedelic stuff mixed with folk music, and dreaming of driving around Echo Park. Winter McQuinn (Winter McQuinn, Sunfruits, Jade Imagine) Making Of 'Move To The Trees'- https://www.youtube.com/watch THE MAKING OF SUNFRUITS 'ONE DEGREE'- https://www.youtube.com/watch "Winter McQuinn is a musician who plays extensively around Melbourne/Naarm, Australia as well as Europe and the UK with Sunfruits, jade imagine and as a solo artist. Winter also works as a freelance publicist at Third Eye Stimuli Records and co founded environmental music organisation Green Your Noise. Green Your Noise is a carbon offset calculator and environmental tool aimed at musicians and creative workers who want to lower their environmental impact. Winter holds a Bachelor of Music from Box Hill and Bachelor of Music Interactive Composition Honours from Melbourne University. Winter has appeared at stages and festivals including Falls Festival, St Kilda Festival, Bigsound Festival, Brunswick Music Festival, The Forum, The Tivoli, Manchester Psych Festival (UK), Misty Fields Festival (NL), Sideral Festival (FR) and more, touring regularly for the past 5 years. Through his practice, Winter has worked with producers such as Tim Harvey (Aldous Harding), Jim Rindlefish (Mildlife), Jesse Williams (Grace Cummings, Leah Senior) Malcolm Besley (North East Party House) as well as organisations including Green Music Australia. Winter has also been nominated for two Music Victoria Awards with band Sunfruits and the Environmental Music Prize in 2023. Winter is passionate about creating a more equitable and regenerative music industry. Recent soundworks include sound design for Stories in the Wall animation project for Arts Centre Melbourne, and multichannel sound piece Drums in Motion for the Signal Sound commissions." Excerpt from https://www.wintermcquinn.com Winter McQuinn: Bandcamp: https://winter-mcquinn.bandcamp.com/music Instagram: @_wintagram_ Website: https://www.wintermcquinn.com Merch: https://winter-mcquinn.bandcamp.com/merch Records: https://www.thirdeyestimuli.com/winter-mcquinn SunFruits: Bandcamp: https://sunfruits.bandcamp.com Instagram: @sunfruitsband Website: https://www.sunfruitsband.com Merch: https://sunfruits.bandcamp.com/merch Records: https://www.thirdeyestimuli.com/sunfruits Jade Imagine: Bandcamp: https://jadeimagine.bandcamp.com/music Instagram: @jadeimaginemusic Website: https://www.jadeimagine.com Merch: https://jadeimagine.bandcamp.com/merch The Vineyard: Instagram: @thevineyardpodcast Website: https://www.thevineyardpodcast.com Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSn17dSz8kST_j_EH00O4MQ/videos

GUEST 1 OVERVIEW: Dr Nataliya Ilyushina is a Research Fellow (Advanced) at the RMIT Blockchain Innovation Hub. She received her PhD in Economics from RMIT University. Her other qualifications include Master of Economics from Melbourne University, double degree Master of Professional Accounting, Master of Commerce from RMIT University and Bachelor of Economics from Moscow State University. X: @DrIlyushina GUEST 2 OVERVIEW: Steve Bastoni is an Italian-born Australian actor, writer and producer with three Australian Academy Award nominations and over 40 years' experience in all facets of showbiz. He became a household name in Australia for his role as Constable Yannis 'Angel' Angelopoulos in Police Rescue and as Steve Parker in Neighbours. His memorable performance in 15 Amore garnered him a nomination for the AACTA Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role. X: @stevebastoni https://dontdiejuly.com/  

Michele Gennoe grew up in Australia obtaining a degree in Marketing and then later an advanced degree. What makes her a bit unique is that after college she took positions with companies that allowed her to travel throughout the world where she had the opportunity to observe people and begin working to help them change their mindset about business and success. For the past roughly twelve years Michele has operated her own business coaching and teaching executives and others all over the world to change their perceptions of success, happiness and life in general. As she told me during our conversation the most important characteristic someone should find and discover if they really wish to be successful is kindness. How true. Six years ago Michele published her book “Mindful Leadership” which is available on Amazon for all to purchase and read. I really appreciated Michele's insights including her idea that no matter what, people could take some time during their day to reflect and strategize for the day. Michele's idea is that if at no other time, take time to think while taking a shower. What do you do in the shower anyway? It is for most people dead time that can be put to productive use. I hope you enjoy Michele's ideas and thoughts. I think you will find what she has to say to be interesting and useful. About the Guest: Michele Gennoe is widely considered one of the world's foremost experts on “success mindset,” which is the art and science of transforming your mindset for success. She is the award-winning author of the book ‘Mindful Leadership' which Andrew Griffiths described as, “This is a book for every leader on the planet”, and is widely quoted for her simple steps to success. She has also been featured in tv, radio and podcasts such as Business Chat Podcast, Channel 31, SME TV, Ticker TV and many more. As host of ‘Mindset Michele TV' she interviews experts on a wide range of topics to share this wisdom with wider audiences of how to build the habits for a successful mindset. Through her individual and organisational work as an executive transformation specialist, Michele has successfully led and coached over 30 organisations and 5,000 clients across the globe. In London, Chile, Los Angeles and India plus others across diverse industries including banking, charity, aged care, education, transport, finance and many more. Michele has invested the last 20 years into studying transformational principles across personal and professional development to bring together a synthesis of leading approaches into her own methodologies and approaches with clients. Michele helps high performing professionals overcome stress, overwhelm and procrastination so you can live the life you love while making a difference. Through her books, live events and signature programs like “Mindset Makeover- redesign your mind for success!” she has empowered millions of people achieve new heights of spiritual aliveness, wealth and authentic success. Here's what others are saying about Michele's work: Michele Gennoe is a truly talented coach. Her sessions focus on building your new normal and reflecting on small changes to create a habit of positivity and gratitude. Michele has helped me learn to appreciate my successes. Claire Lerm, Digital Transformation Journey Lead, Head of Delivery What is my legacy? Do we ever truly regard this question with depth and reverence? Michele has a robust program that suits anyone who needs to remember that our true wellness is sometimes just hidden in our busy mind. She creates a space within us, to find ourselves again and empowers us to be more successful and thrive. Sia Kapeleris, Community Volunteer Michele is a highly innovative leader who shows you how to reach outcomes. She has enormous insights that are expressed through her communications, actions and the amount of support she provides for her clients to be successful. Marianne Kadunc, Founder & Director Mobile Marketing Ways to connect with Michele: https://michelegennoe.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/michelegennoe/ https://www.facebook.com/michele.gennoe/ https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMDtH5Tvzrhlsu-Zgd84si2J6f5Q9ocNF&si=HrJM0vY3I8osE-N5 https://twitter.com/mgennoe https://www.instagram.com/mindsetmichele1/?hl=en Mindful Leadership Book Links https://michelegennoe.com/mindful-leadership-book/ https://www.amazon.com/Mindful-Leadership-Steps-Transforming-Business/dp/0992599814/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= About the Host: Michael Hingson is a New York Times best-selling author, international lecturer, and Chief Vision Officer for accessiBe. Michael, blind since birth, survived the 9/11 attacks with the help of his guide dog Roselle. This story is the subject of his best-selling book, Thunder Dog. Michael gives over 100 presentations around the world each year speaking to influential groups such as Exxon Mobile, AT&T, Federal Express, Scripps College, Rutgers University, Children's Hospital, and the American Red Cross just to name a few. He is Ambassador for the National Braille Literacy Campaign for the National Federation of the Blind and also serves as Ambassador for the American Humane Association's 2012 Hero Dog Awards. https://michaelhingson.com https://www.facebook.com/michael.hingson.author.speaker/ https://twitter.com/mhingson https://www.youtube.com/user/mhingson https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelhingson/ accessiBe Links https://accessibe.com/ https://www.youtube.com/c/accessiBe https://www.linkedin.com/company/accessibe/mycompany/ https://www.facebook.com/accessibe/ Thanks for listening! Thanks so much for listening to our podcast! If you enjoyed this episode and think that others could benefit from listening, please share it using the social media buttons on this page. Do you have some feedback or questions about this episode? Leave a comment in the section below! Subscribe to the podcast If you would like to get automatic updates of new podcast episodes, you can subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts or Stitcher. You can also subscribe in your favorite podcast app. Leave us an Apple Podcasts review Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts, which exposes our show to more awesome listeners like you. If you have a minute, please leave an honest review on Apple Podcasts. Transcription Notes: Michael Hingson ** 00:00 Access Cast and accessiBe Initiative presents Unstoppable Mindset. The podcast where inclusion, diversity and the unexpected meet. Hi, I'm Michael Hingson, Chief Vision Officer for accessiBe and the author of the number one New York Times bestselling book, Thunder dog, the story of a blind man, his guide dog and the triumph of trust. Thanks for joining me on my podcast as we explore our own blinding fears of inclusion unacceptance and our resistance to change. We will discover the idea that no matter the situation, or the people we encounter, our own fears, and prejudices often are our strongest barriers to moving forward. The unstoppable mindset podcast is sponsored by accessiBe, that's a c c e s s i capital B e. Visit www.accessibe.com to learn how you can make your website accessible for persons with disabilities. And to help make the internet fully inclusive by the year 2025. Glad you dropped by we're happy to meet you and to have you here with us.   Michael Hingson ** 01:16 Well, hi once again, and welcome to unstoppable mindset. Thanks for joining us. I am your host, Michael hingson. Well, you can call me Mike as well, it's okay. But I really appreciate you being here to listen to our podcast today. Today, we have a guest, Michele Gennoe. And Michele is a mindset success expert. And she's written a book, which I think is really pretty cool. She wrote a book called mindful leadership. And I'm sure she's going to tell us about that as we go forward. And I think there's going to be a lot to learn about this. She has been an international expert and traveler and speaker on the successful mindset, which is cool. I am absolutely a fan of the concept of a successful mindset anyways, so let's get to it. Michele, thank you for being here with us. And thank you for for coming out on Unstoppable mindset. Thank   Michele Gennoe ** 02:22 you, Michael. It's such an honor and a privilege to be here today with your show and to be speaking to our viewers and listeners and and sharing some of my insights.   Michael Hingson ** 02:32 And Michele is down in Australia. So we didn't get her up too early this morning. But still. It's it's it's early enough. But But no, thank   Michele Gennoe ** 02:43 you, Michael. I'm glad it wasn't quite in the middle of the night.   Michael Hingson ** 02:47 Well, we do try to make it as convenient as we can. And as I tell everyone who's going to come on the podcast. It's all about you scheduling this for when it's convenient for you. So it works out pretty well. Well, would you start by telling us kind of about the the Earlier Michele growing up and some of that kind of stuff and sort of bring us up to date that way.   Michele Gennoe ** 03:09 Well, thank you, Michael. I know Americans love a great migrant story. So mine is also a migrant story. Even though I sound Australian and I grew up here. My family migrated to Australia when I was very young. So I was very lucky in many different ways, I believe, because I've lived many elements of that migrant dream that families do for their children. I was the first in my family that we know of to go to university. We grew up in a pretty idyllic area. So it was kind of grow growing as a town and as an area as a child. But we still had a lot of bush around us. So we were able to go running out there in that bush. My early years were in a small place called Armidale in Western Australia, but I very soon grew up and had a bigger sense of what I wanted to do and where I wanted to go. So I moved to different cities, biggest cities in Australia and I've actually then lived and worked overseas for a number of years in London and South America and got to visit many many different beautiful places there in the US and loved Li and laughed in your walk can even loved you Orleans. And so those travels helped to expand what was part of my passion about understanding people and what motivates them, but also one of my other passions around technology and what was in those days, the synchronicities if you like between, we could talk to each other and like they're all across the world. But did we really understand each other because we had different cultures, different backgrounds and even sometimes different language. All of those different travels and experiences pretty much led to me starting my own business on purpose transformation. Sure, and then the book and then, you know, setting up the TV show and other things that we're doing today, around that mindset and success mindset coaching.   Michael Hingson ** 05:08 Well, so, where did you go to university, I went to   Michele Gennoe ** 05:13 university at a place called Curtin University in Western Australia, I was very lucky again, that I lived on the student campus or college Catholic, they call them colleges, they don't know where the students live on campus, in the States. So I lived on campus. And it gave me an absolutely fabulous experience of the university. And also made it much easier to get to classes when I was running late in the morning.   Michael Hingson ** 05:44 I know the feeling I lived on campus, all the time I was at college for the first three years, I lived in one of the dormitories. And then because I had enough books in braille, that it took up a lot of space, they let me move into one of the on campus apartments for graduate students. So for my senior year, and then my graduate years, I lived in a two bedroom apartment, so shared the apartment with a couple of other people. But I still had enough room for Braille books, and it worked out pretty well.   Michele Gennoe ** 06:18 Sounds fabulous.   Michael Hingson ** 06:19 And I wouldn't trade living on campus for anything. And I appreciate that not everyone can necessarily do that. But there's value in being able to do it if you can, or at least participate in as many activities even if you don't live on campus. Participating in college life is really very important to do I think   Michele Gennoe ** 06:40 it is I remember I, in my first few months went and did a music appreciation class with just as something unusual to do and coming from, you know, that small town and the quite limited environment that I'd grown up in suddenly experiencing mods and rockers and this and that, that was quite an eye opener. And one of the beauties of that experience of experiencing and seeing different people, you didn't necessarily need to agree with them or become what they were or what they followed, that I got to experience all of those different kinds of views on life again. Yeah.   Michael Hingson ** 07:20 Which is really what it's about. It's about learning about different things that may be not typical for you. But that's okay.   Michele Gennoe ** 07:29 Yeah, you know, everything from and this is might be a little bit controversial. But yes, there were communist kind of groups on the campus at the time. So I got to go and experience what that was at one extreme. And at the extreme, I went to the business students who are as a part of their events and was able to become involved in that group.   Michael Hingson ** 07:51 What was it like going to some of those events, the communist groups and so on? What, what did they do? Or how was that different?   Michele Gennoe ** 08:01 What was really interesting for me was they just had a different narrative. I mean, now the world's a bit more complex. So people understand that people may have a different narrative. But like I said, you know, I've only ever heard one view on the Vietnam War, one view on this one view on that. So I didn't believe or disbelieve what they were saying, I just understood that those people had a different view on life. And probably the main thing I connected with was their view at that time, around women equality. And I think the only thing I really got involved with out of that whole group was the, what they called the Reclaim midnight marches, where we will march and you're going to notice days to make it safer for women to go out at night. So it's interesting to reflect now, because people wouldn't necessarily even think of, you know, you need to march to be able to feel safe at night. But in those days, I think people were a little bit more active about their beliefs than perhaps today.   Michael Hingson ** 09:02 Well, now today, of course, we at least hear and I suspect in other parts of the world as well, we tend to not even really want to converse or talk about things and be as open to learning as we used to it's, well, I know my way and I know what's right, and you don't, which is really unfortunate. We've lost the art of conversation, it seems to me to a large degree. Yeah,   Michele Gennoe ** 09:29 I think, you know, I, one of the business students events, they actually had a sexist Bumble competition, which again, you know, at its time, and in its place was fairly innocent. But I still thought it was inappropriate, you know, fast forward a couple of years and of course, it's not appropriate. But at the time when I was kind of making that statement that I understood, they didn't realize that it wasn't appropriate etc. The men and women are I actually thought it reflected badly as a business student and on the association, but again, it was that for me, what I was excited about was that lens just like the business students didn't see that there was anything necessarily right or wrong. The the communist people that were really excited about that area didn't necessarily see anything right or wrong. And I was able to an ability that was I was able to go into these different worlds and make people with different views. And to keep expanding my view, I think, all of us when we're doing that stuff, we're kind of looking well, what am I Blois? What are my values? And what do I really think is going on here? And, and you're right, I think that that critical thought is something that perhaps we're not maybe able to share as much nowadays, because it can be a little bit more black and white, you're either in one area, the other. But yeah, I think it was very, it was a great time, because it was very formative for me to then understand. People have different ways of looking at things and different mindsets, then success can mean one thing for one person and something to somebody else. And nobody's right or wrong, it is just the views.   Michael Hingson ** 11:15 That's the operative part about it. Nobody is necessarily right or wrong. And we should be open to accepting. Other people may have views that differ from our own. Yeah,   Michele Gennoe ** 11:27 and you know, the trans discussion, you know, him her writing, all of these kinds of modern day discussions, if you like, are an evolution of understanding that people have a different view. And they come from a different kind of background. And then working out your values, I believe it's working out your values, and what's important to you, and whether you believe what they believe or not, but respecting that they do have a different lens to things to you. Yeah.   Michael Hingson ** 11:59 Well, so what did you get your degree in?   Michele Gennoe ** 12:03 So my degree was actually in marketing of all sales, because I've never actually been gone and worked in marketing. What funny, but I've met so many LinkedIn coaches that did degrees in biology or whatever now that I think the thing about marketing that I probably took away the most was how much psychology had to do with influencing people to buy and what they brought and how they brought it. So I think, understanding that perhaps, again, those influences, and how marketing and advertising, the whole aim was to tap into people's influences, and then have them buy those services and products.   Michael Hingson ** 12:51 Yeah, which is what marketing is really all about.   Michele Gennoe ** 12:56 It is it is it's convincing, you need something even if you don't necessarily need it. Selling ice to the Eskimos, as they always say,   Michael Hingson ** 13:10 Well, you know, they need them. You kind of have refrigerators? Everybody knows, everybody knows that.   Michele Gennoe ** 13:18 Well, and nowadays, it could be you know, Fer nice as opposed to normal life.   Michael Hingson ** 13:24 Well, did you get advanced degrees? Or did you stop at bachelors or what?   Michele Gennoe ** 13:30 No, I did. I wasn't quite as exciting because I was working. And so when you're working and studying, it's a little bit harder as people know, I did an advanced degree in International Management. And that in those days about that time, you know, I was looking at this concept of, you know, Isn't that fabulous? That can literally do business anywhere in the world now. But if you send them a fax, or an email, or whatever, will they understand what you're saying? Not just even if they can read and write English, but will they understand the nuances and the context. So I did some postgraduate, and that's what my thesis was about was the rise of globalization and localization. Funnily enough, all of the data and the technology and big companies have still been talking about that phenomenon. That's called different things now, but that same sort of AI and the growth of this and the growth of that, that that same concept, the main, you can use different technology, but people are still essentially people at the end of the day. They want to have children and will have good lives have a good job. So the human drive, if you like, is kind of this constant throughout the changes with technology and the ways that we work. So I did that. It took a couple of years and unfortunately, in my second year, my son ever passed away. So it was a pretty tough year. And I was very lucky. I had so long, great supports around me at the University at Curtin that actually helped me to kind of come back and then get through, essentially a year's worth in the last few, four months of union, so yeah, it was fairly intense. But I was very grateful and very lucky that I then had my postgraduate International Management and got to really understand this, at that time, new area called internationalization and globalization. Yeah,   Michael Hingson ** 15:38 I know how tough it can be. And I lost my father, when well, we had gotten married. So my was 34, had been through college and had had a couple jobs. But we lost him in 1984, and then my mom in 1987. And then it is tough. But even for me tougher than both of those was my wife of 40 years, passed away last year, in November. So we were married for two years. And she passed. As I tell people, the body just doesn't always keep up, she was in a wheelchair her whole life. And her body just finally said, I've had enough. And I tell people, it does just always keep up with the Spirit. And again, it is a challenge. But at the same time, I had enough of a warning, what was happening, to mentally start to prepare, but nothing can totally prepare you for something like that, other than you've got to make the decision to move forward.   Michele Gennoe ** 16:39 Yeah, I am so sorry for your loss, especially your wife of 40 years. I think for me, one of the reasons my father passing was also quite dramatic was I was literally it was like out of the movies. And it felt like and maybe because I was sitting in a meeting at work. I was 27 years old. And somebody literally walked in the room and said you need to go to the hospital now. I went to the hospital when he died the next day. So I was very blissfully when my mum passed a few years ago, that I got to go and be with her and healthcare for for the last six months. So completely contrast. And I was very grateful that she was able to hold on and be with us so that it wasn't quite as quick a shock. Like with my father. Yeah, but I think you know, loved ones when they pass. You kind of you mourn the physical passing, but you know that they're always with you. And they love you wherever they're at a spirit might be.   Michael Hingson ** 17:42 I love to tell people that having been married for two years, I've got 40 years of wonderful marriage memories. And I know whatever is going on, I have to be a good kid or I'm going to hear about it from her. So I I have to behave myself. You do you're watching? Oh, yeah. Yeah. That's okay. Like she she can watch and participate all she wants as far as I'm concerned. But you   Michele Gennoe ** 18:12 know, you carry you carry them in the, you know, the funny ways that you smile, you look at people or you you interact with people, I think, because you especially in marriage, you become one person after 40 years.   Michael Hingson ** 18:25 Yeah, very much so and a lot of ways. Well, what did you do after college? Um,   Michele Gennoe ** 18:32 so, I think after I finished my postgraduate studies, which really, you know, changed changed the course of my life in quite a dramatic way. I'd pretty much been talking about traveling and seeing the world up until that point, but not really had the impetus. And then of course, with my father's passing, I then was thinking about going on seeing the world and then I had some memories that I suppressed up until him passing come back. And when those memories came up, it seemed even more appropriate and a right time to then leave what had been fabulous up until that point, but go and live in a different state called Victoria or Melbourne here in Australia. And at that time, I was able to use my university. I've been teaching and lecturing at Curtin by that point when I was doing postgraduate studies, so I was very lucky. I cut off soft landed into Melbourne and taught and worked at Melbourne University in Queensland and Monash. So I started even though I don't think I'd quite chose and I still started down a bit more of an academic path at that point, and then landed in a company it was called Wallmark back then, which gave me the opportunity to kind of grow, not just my career, but again, my understanding of how international business worked at that point, and how, and wool clothing and Walmart was one of the biggest brands in the world at the time, and how they had actually market. And so I was working in their international textiles area, and able to really see big companies, big budgets and big brands and promotion at work around the world.   Michael Hingson ** 20:33 So when did all of that start? When did you go to work for them? Um,   Michele Gennoe ** 20:37 this was in the late 90s. Okay, so one of the other things, I think that was interesting was that I'd grown up and especially my dad had been like a career railway man and UK where we came from, he worked in the railways and in Perth in Western Australia, who worked on the railways. And so he kind of was example of somebody that you get a job, and you stay in that industry or in that company, for all of your working career. So it was a bit of a shock for me, when I started working. And every single company I was working in was restructuring. And so there was no security and this is going from mid 90s onwards, there was no security, no this no that. So all of the constructs, if you like all the belief systems, the lens, like I was talking about earlier, that my dad had shot kind of showing me this is what it's like when you go into the workforce. But I then got into the workforce, it was nothing like that. And there was disruption after disruption. Now, disruption. And I think in my early days, when I first started working in the universities among in industry, like Wallmark, one of the things that shocked me was that people didn't have guaranteed jobs. And this is now I'm talking about like late 90s. So this, what we might think of as a new phenomenon, post COVID now has actually been around since I started working.   Michael Hingson ** 22:15 You know, several people on our podcast have talked about these very same kinds of things. And I and I always ask, I'm very curious about why did things change? Why did we get to a new environment where people didn't stay in jobs, and things became so much less secure? Do you have any notion about that, I   Michele Gennoe ** 22:38 actually have a few different thoughts on it, I think one of the main one being, that there was that, that sense of loyalty from the company to the employee and the employee to the company, that we don't have that. And again, it's not just a recent thing, where people have realized, Oh, I can't go any further in this company or in this job. So I need to leave to be able to further my career. I think that even back then companies, and especially in my view, working with so many different companies had such poor people and culture or HR experiences, that didn't really understand that there was a lot of lip service given to the importance of the employee, etc. And in marketing, taking it back to my very first, love and passion. What they talk about there is, you know, it takes $3 to get like a new customer, and $1 to keep them so that your investment in like an employee or somebody that's working for you should be that $1 a year. But I think even back then, companies didn't invest enough money. And so they were happier, investing $3 per employee to bring them on and all that recruitment, etc. You fast forward to today, and it's even worse. Yeah,   Michael Hingson ** 24:09 it's not following through. And, and she say investing in the same way. And then they wonder why people leave. It's it is interesting, and it's a mind. Well, a mindset that probably really needs to change, and it would be valuable if it did, but companies a lot of companies do what they do. But speaking of mindsets, how did you get into the whole subject of and become interested in the concept of mindset? Great   Michele Gennoe ** 24:41 question. And I think what how people looked at life and trying to understand life was something that I had, like a natural curiosity from when I was quite young, and it was something that they didn't like when I was traveling or when I was studying or even at unit Let's see, as I described, I was still interested in why things were, the way they were or how people were the way they were. So I, I don't think was until probably about 10 or 15 years after my father passed. And I'd been working through this healing journey, that I really started to get into less than why things had happened when I was a child, and more into that whole compassion about him and my family. And I think it's very normal if you have dramatic and challenging childhoods, to be angry for a period of time. And then as you start to realize that this was just humans doing the best that they could do. And that compassion comes in one start to understand more about their motivations. So I had pretty much for about 1020 years, been spending quite a small fortune traveling around the world and doing a number of different courses, and training on a train, do Martinez jinbao, cine facilitator trades this track that I did a insight forecast, which is a month long leadership course they're in California, in LA. So I had spent and invested quite a small fortune. And then I came back to Australia to Sydney. And it was an interesting, I didn't want to say, midlife crisis, but it was kind of approaching that idea where I've been working in it. And I've been CIO, run my own company, and being CEOs or charity companies, etc. And I also had spent that same 20 years in this healing, Journey training, becoming a coach facilitator. And when I wrote my book on mindful leadership, what I realized was that the the crossover point, was something in this mindfulness space. But me being a very practical kind of person. It wasn't just about meditation, it was about implementing it and how people implemented it, no small things like if you're having a meeting, and it's going on for a period of time, you get everybody to stand up and shift chairs. And by shifting chairs, you rewire the brain, because people are looking at the language differently or talking to each other differently. So all these little tools and tips that I've been picking up along those years, and then decided ik, I wrote the book, mindfulness wasn't quite it. And then it was really in that cocoon period called COVID, where we had an opportunity to spend more time thinking about what were we really doing and why we're here that I realized I was actually here to support makeup, people more about empowering them to build a successful mindset. And as soon as I hit on that, everything put away, click, click, click around the experiences I've had in my own life, the trainings I've done. And what evolved from that was this real clarity for me that, you know, this is what I'm here to do, is to support people to feel empowered, that they too can create a successful mindset.   Michael Hingson ** 28:23 So when did you actually publish the book, mindful leadership?   Michele Gennoe ** 28:28 So I published a book about six years ago now, and we republished it about two years ago. And it's been, you know, what Awards, the time, and it's become such an integral part of the way that we work with people and we help them on their journey. It's, again, being an educator by this stage in my life. The book has award winning and leading business people like Gordon Cairns and heads of different areas here, Australia, might not be as well known overseas, but they have case studies in the book. But it also has these exercises. So people read the book of Egypt, chunk size pieces. This is the topic we're talking about. This is the case study. And then there's the exercises to help people to make sure they've learned the concepts that they've just learned. And so for me, it's a tool that I've used and been incredibly grateful for ever since we arrived at about six years ago. Well, you   Michael Hingson ** 29:32 talk about in the book, the fact that the steps to be successful are not complicated or hard. What are some of the steps that you talk about?   Michele Gennoe ** 29:45 So I haven't had a marketing background again, I describe it in terms of seven pays. But so this purpose, what I'll just talk about is purpose. I know people talk about the concept of why do we do things and purpose, etc, etc. And there's many different ways, you know, from using values to this to that. I now have a TV show and I asked people about what does success mean to them. And when they're answering one of the interesting things that comes up less often than I thought is this whole idea of the while the purpose, because again, in everyday life, you don't think about your purpose, you don't think about your wife, you think about the I've got to get the kids to school, I've got to this good or that. So when you bring it down to purpose and your why, for me, it's a much more practical thing. Yeah. What is it that gets people out of bed in the morning, when it's cold and dark, or when they've got to take care of the kids. And a large part of that a large part of the purpose of a why in that sense, is actually to do with more of your innate, what you feel like, like I was sharing for myself, you were here, and what you're on the planet to do. And I feel like many coaches and facilitators, when they're talking about purpose, it's still like a very big kind of thing. And it was for me for many years, I'm not exempt from this. But I feel like you have to the great philosophers of all use to sit with these kinds of concepts for many, many years. And even in Eastern religions, you would have mystics that would go off and sit in caves for many years or something, because they sat in that world with this concept of why am I here? And what am I doing? And I feel like for me, my book, and the way that it helps people to understand how they are as a mindful leader, helps them to connect in a deeper way. And in a very practical way, with what is their purpose, their the essence of why they feel like being here. And it may be to raise a family, it may be to support some loved ones older or younger. It could be all sorts of different things. But it comes back to who you think on that issue.   Michael Hingson ** 32:18 How do you teach people to become a little bit more introspective and analytical to think about these things? Because most people say I just don't have time to really stop and do that sort of thing.   Michele Gennoe ** 32:33 So it's a great question, because it's funny, I used the example earlier of a bundle of this $3. Because I think it's the same thing with people and what I call mental well being. So I'm not talking about mental health, and that's for professional, other kinds of professions. I'm talking about, well being and mental well being. So do you spend the $1, on your mental well being? Or do you wait until you're a bit wobbly and spin the $3. So we have a program called the mindset and makeover program. And in a similar way to what I was saying before, it's very, very practical. So we cover the three years of resilience, of purpose, and of influence. So these three foundational areas help people influence is the easiest one to talk about. It's very much with, when you're connecting with who you are, why you're here, you then project that in your social media, and you're this and that and your LinkedIn. So that you're presenting a congruent, and the key here is congruent image about who you are to the world. So you're not kind of different people to different things. And unfortunately, most people live like that. They live like, I'm a man over here, and I'm update over there and under this and all that. But they're not congruent, you know, I'm, I'm Michael, I'm Michelle, I'm Tom, I've missed I met the label of who they are, or what they do, more importantly, defined. So that's that's very much about, you know, the influence part. The resilience part is helping people to implement more and more of those or companies as well, because companies, companies to influence implement more and more like I shared about the HR policies, well, you want to spend $1 to keep somebody rather than $3 to lose them. Most people leave because they've got bad managers. So what kind of management leadership training do you have, especially in queue to help managers and then the purpose part I spoke about, we're helping people, you know, really to take the time we don't have obviously the time to go and sit in caves or to spend that kind of time going in depth But what you can. And what we do influence people with is taking time away from devices. I like to describe it as when you were a child, and you were playing out in the backyard or this or that, or whatever, you were in that kind of free flow, and that that time standing still space. So as an adult, what we want to do is recreate those play that that sensation, so that you actually had the opportunity on for your brain to kind of reset, and to allow that creativity become bold. Well,   Michael Hingson ** 35:36 all too often, we just don't take any time during the day to think about what we did what we're doing, where we're not taught to be introspective or analytical. And I think that it's important that we work on doing some of that, so that we can really look at what happened today. And how did that all go? Why did it go the way it did? What do I learn from that? Because ultimately, I have to teach myself, whoever I am, what to do to go forward. And people can advise me all day long, but I still have to be the one to teach myself to do it.   Michele Gennoe ** 36:17 You're so right. And I think one of the key areas within those three sections that we work with people on is this level of self talk. So it's not just throughout the day going, Oh, I could have done that better, or I should have done that better. It's actually throughout the day, picking yourself up when you're doing that. And going well, why did I think that? Why Why was I had in myself? Why did I expect differently, and helping people to be the funniest thing, but after all these years, and all the different things that I've done, the key to everything that I've found is actually kindness. And a lot of what we're doing even that's quite practical tools for the business for the individual. What I've found is that actually, we're teaching people at its essence to be kinder. And it's, it sounds quite terrible, but it's actually so true. Just be kind to do. So be kinder in your companies be kinder, if you're leading people, they are having a tough time, just like do and everybody needs to just be kind. It doesn't get much more complicated than that. It's just about kindness.   Michael Hingson ** 37:34 Yeah, well, and kindness. If you if you become more kind, you also become more conscious of what it means to be more kind and, and you become more conscious of why it's important that we do things in a way that helps us be more kind more gentle, to quote George Bush Senior, but to be more of a person that is focused on improving rather than just criticizing or being negative, or it's got to be my way. That's the only way that works. If that makes sense. And I   Michele Gennoe ** 38:21 use this example. All it does, because I use this example all the time. And it's a little bit of a cliche, but it's about when you're watching a child learn to walk and they follow the stand up, follow the stand up. You wait to see people around that child going stupid child, your terrible child, why don't you know how to walk yet, and you should know it, you've done it once, all of these kinds of negative self talk or negative reflections. So as adults, you know, bringing that same kind of support of, well, you've never done that before. And you do really, really well. In fact, Greg Norman and some of the other great sporting giants that I've studied over the years, one of the interesting things that they talk about, because if they play a game of golf, or whatever it is, and then they replay it, at the end, they actually look at all of the things that they did well first, so that they can replay in their mind so that I can hit that ball and play that basketball shot really well. And then they replay the things that they needed to improve. And so they identify it needed to do this differently. And then what they'll do is they'll actually go through in their mind because again, the mind doesn't matter if it's real. If it's if it's not real in the mind. They'll go through it and they'll actually go okay, I needed to turn a little bit more to get that hook or I need to do this one jump a little bit higher. And they'll do that in their mind and they'll rehearse the thing that they need to improve on. But they won't sit there And this is very human. And it's very sad that we do this, but actually have this negative self talk, I should have done that better, I should have a session about should have whatever. So even if we can, you know, the 1% of our day, catch us off with those kinds of thoughts and improve on them, then we can build, I think of them as like mental wellness muscles, we can build and improve on our mental wellness.   Michael Hingson ** 40:27 Well, it is, it is all about establishing the mindset that you're talking about as well. And it is a muscle it is something that has to be developed, it is something that you have to practice to truly bring about. But when you do it, and you do it well, it makes such a difference in your own life much less than the lives of other people.   Michele Gennoe ** 40:51 It does. And just as a comparison, again, going back to the you know, sitting in a cave and being able to get to this point, I remember I saw an interview with the Dalai Lama one time, where somebody asked him, you know, you've been exiled from your country or this, you know, that all of the terrible, terrible difficult things that have happened to him and to the Tibetan people. And they said, but you're still you know, such a happy, positive person, how do you do it, you know, there's the light of the country of the people, the listener of mine, honestly, mind, and he was saying he had to work at it, he would go and meditate every day. And if those negative kind of thoughts or self talk would come up, he would meditate on it to clear it, so that he could come back into his level of balance, and then being on net balance in the world. So like I said, and as people know, it's not necessarily an easy journey, and it can take some time. You don't necessarily need to go away and meditate for two hours, three hours, whatever it is, but taking that two seconds, 10 seconds, to think and go. What was that thought that I was just doing that was actually beating myself up or beating that other person up? Can I find some kindness? Can I find some compassion? And can me can I in that journey to finding it for myself more, essentially, also bring myself back into a form of balance. So that in that balance state, I can keep focusing on where I want to go with that successful mindset.   Michael Hingson ** 42:38 Yeah, well, and the reality is that we all this, as far as I know, go to sleep at night. And it would be a simple task to take a few minutes. As we're preparing to fall asleep, once we're in bed to think about and meditate on things, it may very well be that you can't necessarily do it at other times during the day, although I think it's like anything else. If it is enough of a priority, you will find the time to do it.   Michele Gennoe ** 43:10 I think so. And I did a course many years ago, and we have to practice something every day. And I thought, Oh, how am I going to make this part of my everyday routine. And ever since then, I have done this practice whilst I'm in the shower. Now, it might seem like a funny thing. But if you think about it, most people we get in the shower, you actually kind of an autopilot. Now, you've washed your hair the same way you wash your body the same way every day. So to actually be programming into your mind and into your brain while you're in the shower. I'm this on that whatever affirmation or whatever positive thought or positive self direction that you want. It can take a little practice, of course at first, but it's actually what I would think of as dead time. Because you do in a sense, mentally go to sleep because it's an automated response. Brush my teeth, Do this, do that. So if you can, because not everybody people when they're going to sleep at night there can be a little bit tired or distracted about something. But if you can think in the morning when you get up in that two seconds, 10 seconds and most people's showers are a bit longer than that. And if you can think in the morning, by okay, yes, I know that I've got to do this, that and whatever was the actual day, but this precious time that I have to myself, without the husband and the kids without the boss without the whatever. This precious time I have to myself. I'm going to say the things to myself. I'm going to be kind I'm going to be compassionate. I've got this I'm going to focus on the positive things today. And I'm going to be okay, whatever the affirmation and the words are for you. That will help you to keep building those muscles and then you know taking it from On outside of the shell, that every time you open a door as you open a door, or this is the opportunities, the new opportunity, this is the opening for new opportunities to come into my life as you open the door. There's lots of little tricks that you can use at work at home, wherever, to actually start to programming, that positive mindset. Yeah.   Michael Hingson ** 45:24 And there's no magical, it has to be done this time, or at this time in this way. So I like to do a lot of meditating, when it's really quiet. And the shower, I can tune out the shower, but it's still not the same as when it's quieter. But that's me. And I think you raised a very good point, there is for whatever length of time you're in the shower, it is time that you are doing something very automatic. So you could let your mind you could teach your mind to look at other things while you're taking the shower. Exactly.   Michele Gennoe ** 46:06 And in the same way as you're opening a door. So these are just different examples, because I know many people talk about before you go to sleep, have a gratitude journal have this habit that. And also human people say that they'd love to do that, but they forget. Yeah. Whereas in the morning, you can be a little bit more like or more focused on what you're going to be doing for the day. And also importantly, focused on how you want to be showing up for you during the day. Because you may be going, having a little bit of a tough time here. And I'm so busy, I've got no time for me, no time for all the things I need to do for me, I'm just there for the family, the job to this side, whether it's opening a door, doing it in the shower, find what works for you, as a simple, everyday prompt, that doesn't need you to do something extra on top of what you're already doing.   Michael Hingson ** 47:07 Yeah, the reality is, if we really could analyze everything about our day, we could find time to do this. But it's a matter again, of making it a priority to do that. And   Michele Gennoe ** 47:20 that's the key word the priority. And that's why I like to use that mark an example of you know, one dollars versus $3. Yeah, and people, you know, as you get older, you start to realize, well, actually, yeah, that $1 is me doing a bit more exercise a bit more this a bit more of that. And so you make more of an effort. But yeah, especially for younger viewers or longer younger listeners, recognize and discerning start those positive behaviors and look at the positive building positive mindset. You build those habits into your everyday life?   Michael Hingson ** 47:58 Well, when did you start your own business and go strictly on your own?   Michele Gennoe ** 48:04 So I've been doing on purpose transformation now for 12 years, I can't believe how quickly time flies. It's pretty amazing. And I was thinking about it when I was reflecting for the show. And you know, the journey that we it's kind of been on everything from the first business card, I think we're actually getting a website now. So it's been quite a journey over that time.   Michael Hingson ** 48:35 Well, and and it's keeping you busy, and you've dealt with people all over the world, you had the experience to do that. And you've been able to consult for with people throughout the world and helping people learn this whole concept of successful mindset. And you also started a TV show, as I understand it.   Michele Gennoe ** 48:59 Yes, yes. One of the interesting things to come out of COVID. So as the world as we all were shutting down and, and learning to live differently, much more in this online world, like here through this medium. One of the things that I was doing was running a lot of workshops to help friends and creating materials all the time to help with different tools to later I wasn't even successful that it was about getting out of the fear mindset that people out of fear that what was happening and into more of a stabilized. I'm gonna get through this mindset. And so we out of that came the mindset Michelle show, and it's been such a joy, interviewing people and technology now. Wow, what an opportunity, interviewing people from all over the world, spreading this vision of a saber show as a like a lighthouse in amongst social media. And there's so much negativity in the world and so much negativity being shared across the world, that the show is like this lighthouse of positivity and positive information. And everyday people and not so everyday people come on show share, about how they have created their successful mindset. And like we've talked about today, they share the tools and tips and suggestions, everything from sleeping better through to laughter, we've been very, very lucky. And I've been very surprised with sometimes the, like, I had a paraglider that came on the show and had her three step process for reading successful mindset. And so I've been blown away at the incredible people coming on the show, sharing their gifts, sharing experiences, and being part of this lighthouse of positivity, sharing how anybody I believe in the world can create and be empowered and create that positive mindset for themselves. What   Michael Hingson ** 51:13 are some of the common themes that you hear from people who come on the show?   Michele Gennoe ** 51:17 So interestingly, I never really heard, and I thought I'd like heard people talk about money, and then give a caveat, and then come back to money. But I guess one of the things that has been really interesting is people coming on the show. And the thing is, Pete main thing has been about that, again, in a strange way being about empowerment. So it's about having that freedom to choose when they're working on how they're working. So whether it's a CEO of a company, or a small business owner, the things that they keep talking about, and I think it's one of those things that's going to come up more as a societal trend. Is this focus on time? How much of my time can I control, and can I choose to do things in. So people are not necessarily saying that they don't want to go to work, or they don't want to work for this person or that person. But even the working from home phenomenon that has come through now, people that I interview, that are working on companies or running companies, that the theme keeps coming back the underlying parts that freedom around choosing how and what I do with my time, and when I do it. And I think that the second biggest thing is still about joy. So once people have talked about the freedom around choosing what they can do with their time, it's also about what brings them joy. And for some of the luckier people that I've had on the show, they obviously only now doing things that bring them joy in working with clients and working in organizations that bring them joy. But for most people, it's that journey towards that kind of utopian lifestyle that they're on. And for them, it's more about that transition, you know, whether it's children on work, or husband and wife are called family, aging parents and work juggling all of those different areas of life. And they talk about freedom, and then the joy that it brings to them. And so much less like you might have thought of around the money and kind of element. It's much more about, again, like I said at the beginning of the show, around those human drivers that seemed to be a constant no matter where we are in history and society.   Michael Hingson ** 53:47 So what do you get out of doing the show? Why do you do it?   Michele Gennoe ** 53:49 One of the things I love so much about doing the show is that I think I'm a little bit of a storyteller. I'm a storyteller. And so when I'm hearing other people tell me their stories, like we started when I was talking about the different lenses and my curiosity, when I'm hearing people talking, and I hear the story, and I really get the journal. And there was another gentleman that came on that was a finance coach. And I thought I can get to hear about finance and some coaching etc. And he started talking about his children, and he had come close to having mental breakdowns etc. And he was sharing that his children in the show and their habits etc. The creating a successful mindset and he had observed and worked with them. And this fabric of him as a human being him being brave and sharing his story and coming on the show. This for me is you know, if my reason for being here is to help too. empower people to create that successful mindset, when I'm hearing how people have gone and done that on their own journey, because you don't always need a coach, but at different times, you may need a coach. But these people that are coming on the show that they're talking about their gyms in such a beautiful way, in sharing about how they have created their successful mindset.   Michael Hingson ** 55:23 So for you, who are some of the people that you look up to that you regard is really successful? Or you'd like their mindset in the way they are?   Michele Gennoe ** 55:33 I think that there's a few there like the Dalai Lama example I shared, I think there's a few people. And what I would say is what I think that they are as a shining example of being themselves being purveying warts and all. An older example might be somebody like belly cuddly, who was really good example of someone that's found his niche as a comedian, and has understood that he's got many a demon and lives with those demons. And it's an integrated part of the budget as Billy, come on, all the way through to modern times when you look at someone like Ed Sheeran, I mean, can you even begin to imagine what it would be like to stand at Wembley Stadium with just you and look at her, honestly, that that takes, it's not just the musical talent, the mental talent to go from as a kid standing in your lounge room playing the guitar through friends and families, who as a younger man, standing at Wembley, with just no orchestra nervous now that all of those different things that he did when I stood on up mentally, and I think these, for me are examples of where people are living true to who they are true to their nature, embracing the God given talents, and they are incredibly talented people, but they also work very, very hard. It's not like they got the talent and then didn't have to do anything, they work very hard. But they also have that roundness, that wholeness of the life of sharing who they are, as well. So they don't pretend that they are the best, this best, that best whatever, and that they don't have the same foibles. Everybody else. So these two great male examples, I think, and the female side, you know, there's a number Angular Merkel is probably a big girl crush on Angular Merkel, for exactly the same kinds of reasons her and her husband lived in a tiny flat in Berlin the whole time, she was chancellor of Germany. Now, she could have changed. She was a science teacher, and she could have changed and moved to a bigger house and the diversity that she was actually perfectly happy to England were living where she was living. And being with her husband, she didn't need it, all the scandals and all the other bits and pieces. So I think you can see a theme here where the people that I admire are the ones comfortable, it's an old expression, again, that comfortable in their own skin, successful at what they do, and they work very hard at it. And they don't angler again. Yeah, big girl crush. I didn't try and fit in with the other world leaders by going getting a big mansion. She stayed true to what was important to her. So she didn't feel the pressure from social media or, or any other medium to fit in. She felt comfortable in her own skin. Yeah.   Michael Hingson ** 58:52 Which is really the best. You've got to if you can't, well, if you feel comfortable in your own skin, if you really are that way, then that's what real happiness is is all about. It isn't about lots of money or anything else. First and foremost, you have to be comfortable and like you like yourself, and do what you like to do and enjoy it no matter where it goes and how it goes. Exactly.   Michele Gennoe ** 59:21 I interviewed somebody the other day that had some really good points about perhaps your job or your day job is not which what gives you sparkle joy or lifelong fulfillment. Because your habit or your What does give you joy. So if you like singing, but you're not a good singer, or many people play sport when they're younger and then realize that can't be an elite athlete when they grow up. And I think that the points that Gary Professor Gary Martin, were making were very true. Oh, reloading. I think that those points were very true because not everybody can be a Billy Connolly and Sharon or Angular Merkel. So being comfortable with your own skin, and also recognizing that what you're doing in life is all there to support them.   Michael Hingson ** 1:00:19 Well, let me ask you one last question, then what's in the future for Michelle, and the TV show and all of that? Well,   Michele Gennoe ** 1:00:27 we're coming to the end of our third year. And it's really, really exciting. And again, I'm so so incredibly grateful to all of the different people that has come through and been on the show, and we've got two more years to go. And then it's going to be so exciting, we'll all be coming out five days a week, for 50 weeks of the year. And being that lighthouse, you know, if people are having a good day, or bad, or whatever day, they will know that they can tune in and see an expert in whatever field talking about how they created their successful mindset. And for me, you know, this is a passion of love. It's something I'm very passionate about, about giving back and supporting people, empowering people. And I thank you so much for having me come on the show today, Michael, because the more that people hear about the show and connecting, we're also going to, of course, be looking for more guests. So people listening and want to come away, come on the show, then, you know, please reach out, we're always happy to have more people come on the show. And my passion. And my dream is that one day, anywhere in the world, if somebody goes, you know, I'm not having that crowded day, I need to have a bit of a lift, I need to, you know, reset and come back. I don't have a door handle or shower nearby. And it's not the end of the day, I can't meditate. I've got you know, five minutes on this bus and now tune into the show, and listen to somebody talking about how to had a tough time, but they use these tips on suggestions to create a successful mindset. That would be my vision for where we going next with the show. Well,   Michael Hingson ** 1:02:17 I look forward to having the opportunity to be on it next weekend.   Michele Gennoe ** 1:02:24 Yes, I'm talking to you and ask me similar kinds of questions of you, Michael?   Michael Hingson ** 1:02:30 Well, I want to thank you very much for being here with us today. And spending all this time this has been fun. And I have enjoyed it. I hope people have been inspired. And will go find your book and read it and sit in and seek you out. How do they do that? If somebody wants to talk with you and maybe use your services? How do they do that.   Michele Gennoe ** 1:02:53 So the best way to contact me is through LinkedIn. So Michele, Gennoe, it's Michele with one L for those people listening. And then Gennoe is G e n n o e is also my website is called Michelegennoe.com. So it's fairly easy. You can also get the book mindful leadership on Amazon. So it's available through that and wherever you are listening to this in the world.   Michael Hingson ** 1:03:22 Cool. Well, thank you again for doing this. And I want to thank you for listening to us today. We really appreciate you being here. I hope that Michelle has given you some good things to think about. I appreciate you being here as well. If you'd like to reach out to me, I would love to hear from you hear your thoughts about the show hear your thoughts about anything else. And of course if you know anyone else who might be a good guest, Michele, same for you would love to hear from you. We're always looking for more guests on a stoppable mindset. You can reach me at Michael m i c h  a e l h i at accessibe A c c e s s i b e.com. Or go to our podcast page www dot Michael hingson.com/podcast. And Michael Hingson is m i c h a e l h i n g s o n  all one word. So love to hear from you. And wherever you're listening, please give us a five star rating. We value that very highly. We really appreciate all the inputs and all the things that people have to say. And we especially do of course do love five star rating. So I hope that you'll give us one as well as Michelle one more time. Thanks for being here and we're really looking forward to people's comments and seeing you again next weekend. Thank   Michele Gennoe ** 1:04:40 you so much again, Michael has been an absolute honor is such a privilege to be on your show and to all your listeners and viewers. Thank you I really appreciate you saying God bless you and wish you all the best   Michael Hingson ** 1:04:59 You have been listening to the Unstoppable Mindset podcast. Thanks for dropping by. I hope that you'll join us again next week, and in future weeks for upcoming episodes. To subscribe to our podcast and to learn about upcoming episodes, please visit www dot Michael hingson.com slash podcast. Michael Hingson is spelled m i c h a e l h i n g s o n. While you're on the site., please use the form there to recommend people who we ought to interview in upcoming editions of the show. And also, we ask you and urge you to invite your friends to join us in the future. If you know of any one or any organization needing a speaker for an event, please email me at speaker at Michael hingson.com. I appreciate it very much. To learn more about the concept of blinded by fear, please visit www dot Michael hingson.com forward slash blinded by fear and while you're there, feel free to pick up a copy of my free eBook entitled blinded by fear. The unstoppable mindset podcast is provided by access cast an initiative of accessiBe and is sponsored by accessiBe. Please visit www.accessibe.com . AccessiBe is spelled a c c e s s i b e. There you can learn all about how you can make your website inclusive for all persons with disabilities and how you can help make the internet fully inclusive by 2025. Thanks again for Listening. Please come back and visit us again next week.

On this episode of the Lead With Purpose podcast host, Tze Ching Yeung talks to Gareth Benson, an IP lawyer, to talk about purpose and how he applies purpose to his work. KEY TAKEAWAYS If you are a purpose-driven business it is still a business & it has to run like one. You cannot change & save the world unless it is providing an opportunity for everyone, including yourself. So, it has to be treated as such. You can only amplify this brilliant idea & take it to the masses by employing millions of people. Your ideas are valuable & they're worthy of your protection. If you're going to create an idea that changes the world then it's got to be protected. It's not incredibly expensive, you can get a trademark insured for around AUS$2,000, & that protects you for 10 years.  Mark Getty, of Getty Images, said that IP is the oil of the 21st century, except that it doesn't harm the environment. Ideas are priceless but the opportunity to bring them to market needs to be respected because your ideas have value. The more you share your ideas with others, the more you treat them as assets, the further they will go & the more people they will touch. Education has value. Universities are some of the most powerful brands in the world: Melbourne University, number 1 in Australian, Stanford, Stokholm. Thes institutions licence their IP for very capable people to earn a very good education & they licence it for a fee. Most people don't realise,  but education is a massive business in the world, we pay a premium for it, & we pay for the certificate that you get at the end. The second biggest industry in Australian is education. BEST MOMENTS ‘IP is essentially about ideas. I believe in the power of ideas, & I believe the best ideas can change the world.' ‘Purpose & profit do go together because they make the most impact.' ‘You're not an entrepreneur unless you're providing a sustainable business that can affect thousands of people.' ‘We now live in an ideas economy that's being accelerated by AI in front of our eyes.' ABOUT THE GUEST Gareth Benson is a qualified lawyer with the Law Institute of Victoria, admitted to the Supreme Court of Victoria in 2003 Gareth commenced his articles with boutique media entertainment practice Hebert Geer and Rundle (now Thomson Geers) and for Bradley Allen lawyers in Canberra, Australia's national capital. Website  ABOUT THE HOST Tze Ching started her entrepreneurial journey back in 2007 with the launch of a sustainable clothing & home furnishing ecommerce business. Next, she created a sustainable fashion brand. In 2019, she launched a social enterprise to help raise awareness about the negative impact of fashion at schools & colleges.  Through the 15-year journey, she learned so much, but easily the most meaningful lesson learned was about the importance of marketing. She now focuses on channelling those insights to help others succeed through We Disrupt Agency, a business coaching, mentoring & digital marketing company.  Tze Ching's mission is to create a community of global change makers and to contribute to positive change in both people & planet. CONTACT DETAILS Website Facebook Instagram Twitter LinkedIn

17 May was International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia, called IDAHOBIT. Professor Birgit Lang explains why this day is necessary and how we can show our solidarity with the queer community. She is Professor of German and a historian of gender and sexuality, sex research and psychoanalysis at Melbourne University. - Am 17. Mai war Internationaler Tag gegen Gay-, Bi- und Transphobie. IDAHOBIT genannt. Warum dieser Tag nötig ist und wie wir unsere Solidarität mit der Queer Community zeigen können, erklärt Professor Birgit Lang. Sie ist Professorin für Deutsch und Historikerin für Geschlecht und Sexualität, Sexualforschung und Psychoanalyse an der Melbourne University.

341: The Olympic Marathon Quota | Doha Diamond League | Hanging Rock XCR This episode is sponsored by Precision Fuel & Hydration, check out their free online planner that you can use to work out how much carb, sodium and fluid you need to perform at your best.  Click here then use the code at checkout as mentioned on the show for a discount.   Brad keeps putting in bigger weeks after a year on from his heart worries. Julian sets down a week of easy jogging when the surf isn't up. Brady goes faster than tempo pace at the Hanging Rock XCR.   Seth O'Donnell took out the Hanging Rock 12km at Athletics Victoria XCR, ahead of Harry Norman and Mentone teammate Michael Kernahan. Mentone took out a long-awaited team win in the Premier Division, ahead of Bendigo and Western Athletics. Jessica Coyne for South Melbourne won in a close contest ahead of Bianca Puglisi and Alice Oakley Kerr. Sandringham was the top team in the Women's Premier Division, ahead of South Melbourne and Melbourne University. Aths Vic Results Hub   Jess Hull placed second in the Doha Diamond League with a time of 4:00.84 just behind winner Frewenyi Hailu of Ethiopia, with Georgia Griffith running 4:06.13 and Abbey Caldwell in 4:12.36. Doha Diamond League   World Athletics announces amendments to the Olympic Marathon qualifications with spots designated for Universality places that were not previously introduced, potentially compromising athletes who are within the selection quota with lower rankings, such as Liam Adams and Leonard Korir of the USA. Explainer Article, Athletics Illustrated.   Nat Rule returned to form at the Sound Running Track Fest in Los Angeles with a 15:07.00 5000m, with Sifan Hassan winning solo in 14:58.83. Jenny Blundell who was also in the race ran 15:19.14. Holly Campbell ran 32:23.30 in the Women's 10000m. Sam McEntee ran 13:25.62 for third in the Men's 5000m, Andre Waring 28:56.82 in the Men's 10000m. Sound Running Track Fest Results   Listener Question asks what it takes to fulfil potential in the marathon, then Moose On The Loose goes in to bat for an influencers' prominent critic. The whispers speak that the Olympic marathon teams have been decided. Patreon Link: https://www.patreon.com/insiderunningpodcast Opening and Closing Music is Undercover of my Skin by Benny Walker. www.bennywalkermusic.com Join the conversation at: https://www.facebook.com/insiderunningpodcast/ To donate and show your support for the show: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=9K9WQCZNA2KAN

En el marco de las Fiestas Patrias de Paraguay, conversamos con tres estudiantes de postgrado de Melbourne University sobre la función de la Asociación de Estudiantes Paraguayos (PSA por sus siglas en inglés) que conecta y ayuda a estudiantes de Latinoamérica a establecerse en la ciudad, a la vez que divulga la cultura y tradiciones de Paraguay, incluido el idioma guaraní.

Our guest in this episode is Robyn Cuthbertson. Born in Melbourne Australia and raised in Lower Plenty (about an hour northeast of Melbourne), she learned to sew from her mom. Robyn was always interested in crafting, so sewing was a natural progression for her.  She graduated from Melbourne University with degrees in Engineering and Physics and spent most of her university free time hanging out with the juggling club and perfecting her circus skills on a unicycle. At age 30, while working on her PhD in Engineering, Robyn was diagnosed with mitochondrial disease and was forced to give up her engineering career. Her mom suggested that she try machine quilting and as Robyn puts in…it was “love at first stitch”! When not creating, Robyn practices snorkeling, underwater photography and her newfound passion for free diving.  (2:09) How did her mom start teaching Robyn to sew? Robyn's persistence had a lot to do with it. (3:00) Her grandmother – a tailor – was instrumental as well. (3:32) What's the first thing Robyn made…she tells us here. (4:10)At university, Robyn studied engineering and physics…why these subjects?! For fun and to get a job! (5:08) Have her scholastic degrees helped her get to where she is now? Why yes…they have! (7:39) The juggling club and the unicycle…why? Oh…and fire twirling too! (10:32) Sewing carried Robyn for years – then she was diagnosed with mitochondrial disease. Hear her remarkable story of illness and moving forward in both her body and mind. And then…Robyn and her mom decided to start a business doing something neither of them knew anything about and were initially “terrible” at doing. (13:11) Robyn tells us about mitochondrial disease and what it's like to live with. (16:10) Who inspires Robyn? There are four individuals who have made a lasting impression on her and her work. Annamieke Mein https://www.annemiekemein.net.au/, Bethanne Nemesh https://whitearborquilting.com/, Judi Madsen https://www.judimadsen.com/ and Cindy Needham https://www.cindyneedham.com/. And the whole community has inspired her as well! (20:19) When the pandemic hit and quilt shows were shut down, Robyn turned to textile art. This was a difficult time for her after all of the work she had put into her quilts. Not finding motivation to continue quilting…she found textile art with a 6” square piece. (22:21) What's she working on now? (23:19) Robyn's spare time is taken up by underwater photography, snorkeling and free diving. She shares with us why these are important and exhilarating for her. (26:58) Why does Robyn think she's a goldfish? And, what's next for her? (27:55) What's her dream? (29:25) What didn't I ask? (30:10) How do you reach Robyn? www.robynjdesigns.com.au and on Instagram            @robynjdesings  If you know someone who has an outstanding story that should be shared on this podcast, drop Meg a note to Meg@sewandsopodcast.com or complete the form on our website. Be sure to subscribe to, review and rate this podcast on your favorite platform…and visit our website sewandsopodcast.com for more information about today's and all of our Guests.

https://www.antiherosjourney.com/ Graham Priest grew up as a working class kid in South London. He read mathematics and (and a little bit of of logic) at St. John's College, Cambridge. He obtained his doctorate in mathematics at the London School of Economics. By that time, he had come to the conclusion that philosophy was more fun than mathematics. So, luckily, he got his first job (in 1974) in a philosophy department, as a temporary lecturer in the Department of Logic and Metaphysics at the University of St Andrews. The first permanent job he was offered was at the University of Western Australia. He moved to Australia when he took up the position, and has spent most of his working life there. After 12 years at the University of Western Australia, he moved to take up the chair of philosophy at the University of Queensland, and after 12 years there, he moved again to take up the Boyce Gibson Chair of Philosophy at Melbourne University, where he is now emeritus. While he was there, he was a Fellow of Ormond College. During the Melbourne years, he was also an Arché Professorial Fellow at the University of St Andrews. He is a past president of the Australasian Association for Logic and the Australasian Association of Philosophy, of which he was Chair of Council for 13 years. He was elected a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Humanities in 1995, and awarded a Doctor of Letters by the University of Melbourne in 2002. In 2009 he took up the position of Distinguished Professor at the Graduate Center, City University of New York, where he now lives and works. Graham has published in nearly every leading logic and philosophy journal. At the last count, he had published about 240 papers. He has also published six monographs (mostly with Oxford University Press), as well as a number of edited collections. Much of his work has been in logic, especially non-classical logic, and related areas. He is perhaps best know for his work on dialetheism, the view that some contradictions are true. However, he has also published widely in many other areas, such as metaphysics, Buddhist philosophy, and the history of philosophy, both East and West. Graham has travelled widely, lecturing and addressing conferences in every continent except Antarctica. For many years, he practiced karatedo. He is a third dan in Shobukai and a fourth dan in Shitoryu (awarded by the head of style, Sensei Mabuni Kenei in Osaka, when he was training there). Before he left Australia he was an Australian National kumite referee and kata judge. Nowadays, he swims and practices taichi. He loves opera, jazz, and 60's rock… and East Asian art. https://grahampriest.net/ https://www.navigatesni.com/free-consultation

Brought to you by AeroPress 3-in-1 coffee press for delicious brews, Allbirds incredibly comfortable shoes, and LinkedIn Jobs recruitment platform with 900M+ users. Simon Coronel (simoncoronel.com) is legally classified as an “Alien of Extraordinary Ability” by the United States Government for his skills as a magician and illusionist. Simon discovered magic in 1999 as a first-year student at Melbourne University. He then spent five years working full time in management consulting while juggling his “secret” performance career. He's currently a jigsaw puzzle designer for The Magic Puzzle Company, which has the #1-backed puzzle on Kickstarter of all time, and is a regular performer at the Magic Castle in Hollywood.Simon has appeared twice on the hit TV show Penn & Teller: Fool Us. He has won over a dozen international awards for magic, including being crowned the World Champion of Magic in 2022 at FISM, the Olympics of magic. Please enjoy!*This episode is brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs! Whether you are looking to hire now for a critical role or thinking about needs that you may have in the future, LinkedIn Jobs can help. LinkedIn screens candidates for the hard and soft skills you're looking for and puts your job in front of candidates looking for job opportunities that match what you have to offer.Using LinkedIn's active community of more than 900 million professionals worldwide, LinkedIn Jobs can help you find and hire the right person faster. When your business is ready to make that next hire, find the right person with LinkedIn Jobs. And now, you can post a job for free. Just visit LinkedIn.com/Tim.*This episode is also brought to you by Allbirds! Allbirds are incredibly comfortable shoes, sustainably made, with design rooted in simplicity. I've been wearing Allbirds for the last several months, and I've been alternating between two pairs. I started with the Tree Runners (in marine blue, if you're curious), and now I'm wearing the Tree Dashers, and the Tree Dashers are my current “daily driver.” I stick with the blue hues, and the Dashers are in buoyant blue. The color pops, and I've received a ton of compliments.The Tree Dasher is an everyday running and walking shoe that's also great for light workouts. It's super comfortable, and I've been testing it on long walks in Austin and New Zealand on both trails and pavement. Find your perfect pair at Allbirds.com today and use code TIM for free socks with a purchase of $48 or more. Just add a pair of socks to your shopping cart and apply code TIM to make the pair free.*This episode is also brought to you by AeroPress! If you haven't tried coffee made with an AeroPress, you're in for a treat. With more than 45,000 five-star reviews and customers in more than 60 countries, it might be the highest-rated coffee maker on the planet. This press uses a patented 3-in-1 technology that combines the best of several brew methods into one, easy-to-use, very portable device. Because it combines the best of 3 methods, you get a cup that is full bodied, like a French press; smooth and complex, like when using the pour-over method; and rich in flavor like espresso.As I wrote in The 4-Hour Chef: “This is now, bar none, my favorite brewing method.” And now, exclusively for you, get free shipping and 15% off the new AeroPress XL at AeroPress.com/Tim.*For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsorsSign up for Tim's email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim's books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissYouTube: youtube.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, Margaret Atwood, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, Dr. Gabor Maté, Anne Lamott, Sarah Silverman, Dr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.