POPULARITY
6 episodes with substantially
5 episodes with substantially
4 episodes with substantially
3 episodes with substantially
2 episodes with substantially
2 episodes with substantially
3 episodes with substantially
2 episodes with substantially
2 episodes with substantially
The Economic Research Service says the number of U.S. wheat farms has dropped substantially over time, and in 2024, U.S. beef exports are expected to be about 83% lower than 2023.
Welcome to this week's new Podcast Episode with Attorney Ken W. Good. Graduated from Hardin Simmons University in 1982 with a Bachelor of Arts Degree, he received a Master of Education degree in 1986 from Tarleton State University, a part of the Texas A. And M. System. In 1989 he received this law degree from Texas Tech School of Law where he was a member of the Texas Tech Law Review. Mr. Good has argued cases before the Supreme Court of Texas and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, along with numerous Court of Appeals, including the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Mr. Good is married and has 2 daughters. and I am so excited to have you here because we need to bring justice, and we need to break the silence. and bring awareness of this hot topic issue that is affecting many, many domestic violence survivors throughout the country! Please visit my website to Subscribe to my Podcast and to Learn more about my Coaching Programs: https://www.letsbreakthesilence.com Please Reach out to Attorney Ken Wood : https://www.pbtx.com The Bail Post.com (Podcast) --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/angeline-mitchell/support
US Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken has found a hardened political landscape as he tours the Middle East for the fifth time since the Gaza war erupted.
The Israelites revered so much their Temple in Jerusalem because it contained the Ark of the Covenant. That ark supposedly contained the tablets of the covenant that God drew up when he gave them to Moses to signify His commitment to His people Israel. That was all a symbol of His Presence. However, in the Catholic Church we have the sanctuary too but this time with the Tabernacle that contains the Blessed Sacrament, that is the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ. It is not anymore a symbol of God's Presence. He is truly, really and substantially present there. This presence is referred to as the Real Presence.
There is an outright conflict between cybersecurity and supply chain risk management (SCRM), and simply adding those together can lead to an increase in cyberattacks, a new report finds. Researchers found that cybersecurity and supply chain risk management are in many instances at odds with each other. There are trade-offs, and understanding what those trade-offs look like will allow the Defense Department to better secure its defense industrial products supply, according to the authors of the new RAND Corp. report. Against the backdrop of high-profile cyber attacks on the supply chains, the Air Force Research Laboratory asked the federally-funded think tank to help them understand how cyber risks compare to other risks in the defense-industrial supply chains and provide recommendations on how to have a comprehensive approach when addressing their needs together. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Are you wondering how to buy gift cards below face value? On this episode of Eight Frugal Minutes, we reveal why you should check Costco before buying gift cards anywhere else as they are offering discounts on gift cards to their members like never before. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/eight-frugal-minutes/message
[powerpress] Join Kevin Hargraves, a veteran business owner with 40+ years of success, as he shares transformative strategies for growing revenue and profits. From revitalising trade businesses to coaching on powerful growth tactics, Kevin's insights are invaluable for any business owner. The post 28 – How to Substantially Grow Revenue and Profit appeared first on TRADIE SUCCESS.
As soon as we learned there was ANOTHER version of Hitchcock's Blackmail--the silent version, which was actually more popular at the time than the "talkie" version was--we knew we had to set aside the time to watch it. It's not exactly a different movie. Most of the cast is the same. Most of the shots are the same. But it IS different. Substantially so; it's the original way the film was shot, and it's silent. Even though its not its own movie, not really, a deep dive into Hitchcock's filmography wouldn't be complete without it, so we're sitting down to watch it. Join us :)
In a significant victory for SpaceX, a federal court judge ruled in favor of the aerospace giant, putting a halt on the pending lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The lawsuit, which was centered around charges of hiring biases against refugees and asylees, has been delayed for the time being. The DOJ had earlier lodged an administrative lawsuit against SpaceX, arguing that the company discouraged job applications from asylum seekers and refugees, contrary to the Immigration and Nationality Act. According to the lawsuit, SpaceX allegedly engaged in such discriminatory hiring practices from a four-year period stretching from 2018 to 2022. This prompted SpaceX to counteract, denying the allegations and presenting a countersuit. The aerospace company held that the administrative lawsuit was not in line with the constitution. In late ruling on a Wednesday, Judge Rolando Olvera of the Southern District of Texas intervened and paused the DOJ's lawsuit. This ruling was made awaiting the outcome of SpaceX's countersuit. Substantially, this comes as a form of relief to SpaceX. Judge Olvera ruled in favor of SpaceX pointing out that the administrative law judges, appointed by the attorney general, had overstepped their jurisdiction. He highlighted that the administrative law judges were exercising powers that should only be held by officials appointed directly by the President, thereby indicating a breach of the legal bounds.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this episode we welcome to the show Matt Rotondo, Head of Brand Division at Sugar23. Matt reveals how Sugar23 are shaking up the entertainment space through an innovative co-creation process with brands from the earliest deevelopment stages. With extensive experience in advertising and brand partnerships, Matt shares insights into how he is helping brands to strategically leverage entertainment to impact business positively - and create exciting new projects. Traversing the development of projects like scripted comedies, and the distribution process, the converstion delves into the power of brand partnerships, with Matt sharing success stories of brands like Mattel and Dove transitioning their products into cultural phenomena. The episode concludes with a discussion on how brand activations, film festivals, and theatrical releases can foster deep connections with audiences. Tune in to learn how brands can systematically engage with their consumers through theatrical and streaming releases. About Matt Rotondo Matthew Rotondo began his marketing career at Wieden+Kennedy, an independent, fiercely creative advertising agency where he contributed meaningfully to some of Nike and Microsoft's greatest work. Matt then worked globally for some of the top marketing networks – McCann and BBDO - living in NY, Hong Kong and LA. In LA he pivoted towards entertainment, in a marketing leadership position at Creative Artists Agency (CAA), building creative campaigns for corporate brands from within the entertainment industry. Matt helped his corporate clients find and develop opportunities to connect with consumers unlike any other marketing agency, identifying global opportunities for Budweiser, Burberry, Diageo, Harley-Davidson, QVC, Ralph Lauren, Unilever, Virgin and many more. At CAA Matt became a leading source of corporate revenue, delivering $40M+ in retainer earnings during the 10 years of his tenure. Substantially more was earned through his ability to parlay marketing relationships into talent and creator client opportunities. In 2019 Matt executive produced an IMAX documentary titled Superpower Dogs, securing $4M from Mars Petcare. This project pioneered new forms of sponsorship value from edutainment projects. The film continues to run in the global network of museums and science centers. Today Matt leads the branding division of Range Media Partners, responsible for developing the business model for this nascent group. Out of the gate Matt secured representation for Waffle Iron Entertainment, Nike's entertainment production division. Further, Matt is leading talent business deals for several of Range's largest clients, driving business models, branding and partnerships. He's lived in Nashville, TN since 2014.
The Coalition for Justice and Human Rights is taking legal action to stop the city's clearing of encampments. Plus, we discuss gaps in transit service, the new Edge Fund, development along 99 Street, and the cost of urban sprawl.Here are the relevant links for this episode:Transit gaps Edmonton considers developing transit services for youth and community On the agenda: Police funding formula, Heritage River designation, and more CSWB updateEdmonton works towards next step in safety and well-being strategyEncampment lawsuit Human rights group sues City of Edmonton over encampment clearing Avnish Nanda's tweet Substantial completion Suburban sprawl costs Edmonton taxpayers more than infill: City report Edmonton considers new standard to control urban sprawl Edge FundNews Release: New Edmonton Edge Fund will drive business innovation and transformation 99 StreetDevelopment on 99th Street has been stagnant for years. What happened?Chief McFeeEdmonton police chief says 'enough is enough'Pickleball chaosPickleball pros to show their stuff in EdmontonCommissioner recruitmentNews Release: Police commission member recruitment underway Speaking Municipally is produced by Taproot Edmonton, a source of curiosity-driven original stories, curated newsletters on various topics, and locally focused podcasts, all in the service of informing Edmontonians about what is going on in their community. Sign up to get The Pulse, our weekday news briefing. It's free! ★ Support this podcast ★
During this episode you will learn how to take fantastic notes that lead to better grades. You will learn some of the habits of the best note takers. Learn how you can get organized and have a better strategy as you study. Also, consider getting the Seven Secrets of How to Study at http://www.DrJonesbooks.com --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/stephen-jones91/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/stephen-jones91/support
Join us for an enlightening episode as we dive into the dynamic realm of short-term rental investment with the brilliant Jeff Brown, founder of Intellihost. Intelllihost is an innovative platform that measures your search performance on Airbnb and delivers data-driven recommendations to maximize your revenue potential. As an experienced short-term rental investor and host, Jeff brings a wealth of knowledge to guide those who rely on rentals as their primary income source. Join us as we discuss the short-term rental market and the benefit of using Intellihost in gaining a competitive edge in the industry! Tune in! Key Takeaways [00:00] Introducing Jeff Brown and his journey into the short-term rental space [07:26] The problem in the short-term rental industry and how Intellihost solves it [14:08] How Intellihost helps you positively affect your ranking on Airbnb [25:58] What is AB Testing? [27:40] How Intellihost adjusts its strategy depending on the season [29:46] Intellihost's prices [31:03] Jeff's insights into the current state of the market [33:54] Jeff's insights into the future of short-term rentals [37:14] Connect with Jeff Guest Links Website – https://intellihost.co/Email – jeff@intellihost.co Show Links Join me for my live Masterclass on July 12, 2023 at 3:30 p.m. (CT): livingoffrentals.com/start Living Off Rentals YouTube Channel – youtube.com/c/LivingOffRentals Living Off Rentals Facebook Group – facebook.com/groups/livingoffrentals Living Off Rentals Website – livingoffrentals.com Living Off Rentals Instagram – instagram.com/livingoffrentals Living Off Rentals TikTok – tiktok.com/@livingoffrentals
AP correspondent Rita Foley reports on Ford Lightning Prices
Dr. Charles Loprinzi shares the latest update to the management of cancer cachexia guideline. Dr. Loprinzi discusses the evidence that prompted the rapid update to the guideline and reviews the new evidence-based recommendations, including the addition of low-dose olanzapine as a treatment option for patients with advanced cancer to improve weight gain and appetite. Dr. Loprinzi reviews the limitations of the update, and outstanding research questions in the domain of cancer-associated cachexia. Read the latest update, "Cancer Cachexia: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update" at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines TRANSCRIPTThis guideline, clinical tools, and resources are available at http://www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines. Read the full text of the guideline and review authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest disclosures in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.23.01280 Brittany Harvey: Hello and welcome to the ASCO Guidelines podcast, one of ASCO's podcasts delivering timely information to keep you up to date on the latest changes, challenges, and advances in oncology. You can find all the shows, including this one, at asco.org/podcasts. My name is Brittany Harvey, and today I'm interviewing Dr. Charles Loprinzi from Mayo Clinic, Co-Chair on “Cancer Cachexia: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update.” Thank you for being here today, Dr. Loprinzi. Dr. Charles Loprinzi: It's a pleasure to participate. Brittany Harvey: Then, just before we discuss this guideline, I'd like to note that ASCO takes great care in the development of its guidelines and ensuring that the ASCO conflict of interest policy is followed for each guideline. The disclosures of potential conflicts of interest for the guideline panel, including Dr. Loprinzi who has joined us here today, are available in line with the publication of the guideline in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, which is linked in the show notes. Then, to get into the content of this rapid recommendation update, first, Dr. Loprinzi, what prompted this rapid update to the ASCO management of cancer cachexia guideline, which was previously published in 2020? Dr. Charles Loprinzi: The impetus for the updated guideline was a recent JCO publication regarding the results of a randomized controlled trial looking at olanzapine. This prompted the expert panel to revisit this topic. The trial, conducted in India, involved 124 patients with stomach, hepatopancreatobiliary, or lung cancers as they initiated chemotherapy. Weight gain greater than 5% occurred in 60% of patients in the olanzapine arm versus 9% of the patients in the placebo arm with a p-value of 0.001 or less. Substantially improved appetite was seen in 43% versus 13%, with placebo also a p-value of less than 0.001. Grade 3 or greater chemotherapy toxicity was less common with olanzapine 12% versus 37%, with placebo with a p-value of 0.002. No substantial olanzapine-associated toxicity was apparent. There was one evidence of this with olanzapine versus two for placebo. So that was the reason for going ahead with this update. Brittany Harvey: I appreciate that background information. So then, based on this updated study on olanzapine, what are the updated recommendations from the expert panel for treating cancer cachexia? Dr. Charles Loprinzi: So, let me start to address this question by reviewing what the 2020 ASCO guidelines published said regarding the management of cancer cachexia in adults with advanced cancer. It concluded that evidence was insufficient to strongly endorse any pharmacologic agent for established anorexia/cachexia. Nonetheless, the guideline recommendation supported that clinicians could offer a short-term trial of a progesterone analog such as megestrol acetate or a corticosteroid such as dexamethasone to patients experiencing weight loss and/or appetite stimulation. These drugs stimulated appetite and caused weight gain, but they did not improve quality of life, they did not improve survival, and there was toxicity associated with these agents and therefore it was not strongly recommended. The expert panel thoroughly discussed a potential role for olanzapine because of a couple of trials suggesting it was beneficial but concluded that the evidence was insufficient for a recommendation. Now, there was evidence from two randomized trials that supported olanzapine was an effective alternative for treating cancer-associated anorexia/cachexia. Thus, olanzapine was considered promising, but the data were not conclusive enough to support a guideline treatment recommendation. The new JCO publication was the impetus for making this guideline change. Brittany Harvey: Understood. So then, based off this new change to the recommendations, what is the breadth of these recommendations and what do these options mean for patients with advanced cancer? Dr. Charles Loprinzi: The updated guidelines recommended that for adults with advanced cancer, clinicians could offer low-dose olanzapine once daily to improve appetite and cause weight gain. It was noted that the majority of the evidence for this recommendation came from patients with lung or GI cancers, and the largest study enrolled patients who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy concurrently. Having said this, there's evidence from the other two randomized trials noted above that olanzapine is helpful in patients with a wide variety of cancers and regardless of whether patients were receiving concomitant chemotherapy. Of note, extensive data support that olanzapine leads to significant appetite stimulation and weight gain in patients without cancer who were taking olanzapine for psychiatric reasons. This was known from a long time ago in patients in that situation, who don't necessarily want to gain weight, would gain 10-20-30-40 pounds, get prediabetes, and get diabetic sort of troubles. The guideline update continues to support that clinicians may offer a short-term trial of a progesterone analog or a corticosteroid to those experiencing weight loss and/or appetite when there's a good reason for not using olanzapine. Brittany Harvey: Understood. I appreciate you reviewing those two updated recommendations from the guideline panel. So then you've talked about this a little bit already in describing the study details, but what is exciting about olanzapine in this setting and what should clinicians know as they implement these updated recommendations? Dr. Charles Loprinzi: It's exciting that olanzapine is now the best-studied established treatment available for patients suffering from cancer-associated anorexia/cachexia in different oncologic situations, for prevention and/or for treatment of cancer-associated or cancer treatment-associated nausea and/or vomiting, and for treatment of cancer-associated anorexia/cachexia. Varying daily doses of olanzapine have been used, ranging from 2.5 to 10 milligrams per day. Data support that it is quite appropriate to use the 2.5-milligram per day dose for the initial treatment of cancer-associated appetite and/or weight loss. For patients who do not appear to benefit and have no apparent olanzapine toxicity, it seems reasonable to me to try a higher dose. Another thing to note is that olanzapine is a generic drug which is relatively inexpensive. While this drug has been noted to cause sedation, such sedation is usually short-lived despite drug continuation. Brittany Harvey: So then, it's great to hear that recent data have caused an update to these guidelines. But in your perspective, Dr. Loprinzi, what are the most pressing outstanding questions regarding the management of cancer cachexia? Dr. Charles Loprinzi: My goodness, you're putting pressure on me. I've been involved with a large number of cancer anorexia/cachexia trials for the better part of four decades, which did not support as strong an ASCO guideline recommendation as we now have with olanzapine. Noting that I was involved with one of the trials that supported that olanzapine was helpful for treating cancer-associated anorexia/cachexia. This is one of the trials. It was a short trial. We were mainly looking at nausea and vomiting treatment for advanced cancer, but we saw a marked increase in appetite in over just a day or two of using olanzapine. Having said this, there's always room for improvement, and a number of drugs are under development for treatment of cancer-associated anorexia/cachexia. Recent discussions regarding the topic of olanzapine for treating cancer-associated anorexia/cachexia noted that the primary endpoint of the current trial was weight gain and that this was felt to be a more objective endpoint than appetite would be. As noted in the earlier part of the discussion, substantial improvement was seen both in weight gain and appetite, both with p-values of less than 0.001. My own opinion is that appetite improvement is as important, if not more important than is weight gain in the study population. Given that the trial was double-blinded and placebo-controlled, appropriate questionnaires regarding appetite should be able to be considered as an objective evaluation of a subjective symptom in the same way that appropriate questionnaires regarding a patient's pain can be considered an objective evaluation of a subjective symptom. For some of these subjective symptoms, you just don't have other good ways we can figure these things out by a blood test or something like this. So it's what the patient says which is most important. Brittany Harvey: Absolutely. Incorporating how the patient feels is key to achieving better outcomes for patients. So I want to thank you so much for your work to rapidly update this guideline and thank you for your time today, Dr. Loprinzi. Dr. Charles Loprinzi: You're welcome. Pleasure to participate. Brittany Harvey: And thank you to all of our listeners for tuning in to the ASCO Guidelines podcast. To read the full guideline, go to www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines. You can also find many of our guidelines and interactive resources in the free ASCO Guidelines app, available in the Apple App Store or the Google Play Store. If you have enjoyed what you've heard today, please rate and review the podcast and be sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experiences, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.
Chip is back, Tez and Chip talk to Substantial about his new record, Adultish, and he plays Florida or NOT. Also Sam Alito likes fish, Texas sucks, Propublica wins all the awards, and something weird is going on in NC. Plus new music from Substantial, and Bryan bats a thousand!
#BRNAM #1312 | Wearable devices are ‘substantially underused' among people with heart disease | Dr. Rohan Khera, Assistant Professor of Medicine at the Yale University School of Medicine | #Tunein: broadcastretirementnetwork.com or your #favorite #streaming / #podcast / #smarttv / #localtv / #digital #platform
Sunday, 18 June 2023 “for in Him we live and move and have our being, as also some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also His offspring.' Acts 17:28 Paul has stated that God has ordained the boundaries of the nations so that people should seek the Lord, and in feeling for Him, He might be found. He said this while noting that He is not far from each of us. He now explains that saying, “for in Him.” The word “in” can have various connotations. One of them is to be inside of something else. It can also mean being the product of, such as “In His act of creating, God displayed infinite wisdom.” Further, it can be used to help define something else. For example, “In seven days, I will finish this job.” Paul is probably saying this in the sense of being the product of, but because of that, it would be inclusive of the thought of being inside of or surrounded by. We are the product of His hand and thus “we live.” The word means exactly that. It is experiencing the gift of life given by God. We are the product of His act of creation, but we are also being sustained by Him, as it says in Colossians 1 and Hebrews 1. For example – “For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist.” Colossians 1:16, 17 God created and He sustains. Further, Paul continues, saying, “and move.” The word signifies the act of moving. It is translated as wagging in Matthew 27:39. In Revelation, Jesus tells the church at Ephesus that He will remove their lampstand unless they repent. However, the word also is used figuratively to indicate the arousal of passions. Ellicott seems to rightly argue that this is the intent here. This is the only time Paul uses the word. Its other two uses in Acts are by Luke. One is in the sense of provocation and another refers to stirring up sedition. If the first word, live, refers to the physical existence of man, this one would speak of his emotional nature. Remembering that the purpose of Paul's words is based on the previous verses where man is to seek after God, this makes complete sense. First, man is created by God and our lives are the product of His hands. Thus, we have a responsibility to search out the One who so fashioned us. Second, our emotions are a part of who we are and they are to be directed to conduct that would support our seeking after Him. Third, Paul continues with, “and have our being.” The words are an unnecessary paraphrase. It is a single word meaning “are.” Therefore, an equivalent idea is “and exist.” Not only do we have life as a product of His hand, but our continued existence, from moment to moment is fully known to Him and dependent on Him. This is reflected in Jesus' words – “Are not two sparrows sold for a copper coin? And not one of them falls to the ground apart from your Father's will. 30 But the very hairs of your head are all numbered. 31 Do not fear therefore; you are of more value than many sparrows.” Matthew 10:29-31 The existence of the sparrow is known to God, the state of the hair on our heads – which is a part of our existence – is known to God, and the number of our days is known to God – “Since his days are determined, The number of his months is with You; You have appointed his limits, so that he cannot pass.” Job 14:5 Paul's words indicate the total dependence of man on God. Thus, man should acknowledge that He is reliant on Him and seek Him out. His nearness makes this possible and it is thus man's duty to perform. With that noted, Paul next goes outside of Scripture to make his point, saying, “as also some of your own poets have said.” When he says, “your own poets,” he is not referring to Athenians specifically, but Greek-speaking Gentiles whose work was known and quoted among the people. By quoting such a poet, it would lead the Athenians to know that he wasn't just a wandering Jew, but an educated man who knew Greek literature. As for the word “poet,” it is introduced into Scripture here, poiétés. It signifies a doer or a performer. In this case, because Paul will cite poetry, it refers to a doer of poems. As Paul notes poets in the plural, he is indicating that what he will cite is found in more than just one poet. It was a well-known thought used again by another. The poets are Aratus and Cleanthes. Paul cites their words, saying, “For we are also His offspring.” In other words, these Gentile writers understood that man is the product of a greater being. The being they ascribe their life to may not be the God of the Bible, but the premise of being the product of a divine being was understood by them. Aratus was from Cilicia where Paul was from. He lived from 315-240 BC. Cleanthes was from Behram, Turkey, living from 331-232 BC. Concerning this line of poetry, Barnes writes – “This precise expression is found in Aratus (‘Phaenom.,' v. 5), and in Cleanthus in a hymn to Jupiter. Substantially the same sentiment is found in several other Greek poets. ... Aratus passed much of his time at the court of Antigonus Gonatas, king of Macedonia. His principal work was the ‘Phoenomena,' which is here quoted, and was so highly esteemed in Greece that many learned men wrote commentaries on it. The sentiment here quoted was directly at variance with the views of the Epicureans; and it is proof of Paul's address and skill, as well as his acquaintance with his auditors and with the Greek poets, that he was able to adduce a sentiment so directly in point, and that had the concurrent testimony of so many of the Greeks themselves. It is one instance among thousands where an acquaintance with profane learning may be of use to a minister of the gospel.” The specific lines of poetry from Aratus state – “From Zeus begin; never let us leave His name unloved. With Him, with Zeus, are filled All paths we tread, and all the marts of men; Filled, too, the sea, and every creek and bay; And all in all things need we help of Zeus, For we too are his offspring.” Aratus from Phenomena Cleanthes' words are almost identical and are in a hymn to Zeus. Paul's point is that truth can be found in other religions and philosophies and it can be used for the benefit of evangelizing. However, this does not mean that the religion itself is true. In verse 23 he referred to a Greek altar to show that he was not introducing foreign gods. He does the same here by supporting his knowledge of God with words from Greek writers. They may have been confused about who this God is, but they could not say he was introducing a foreign one. Rather, he is clarifying what was stated by them. Life application: When evangelizing someone of another religion, asking what that person believes is a good way of helping him process what you are telling him. This is because most people really have no idea about their own religion. They do things because that is what they were taught to do. This is no different than evangelizing someone who has been in church his whole life but has never been told the simple gospel. Such people go to church and do stuff. But they have no idea as to why they do what they do. It is just a part of their cultural life and so they continue with it. However, without knowing Jesus, those people cannot have a close and personal relationship with God. Introducing them to what Jesus has done will make this possible. There will no longer be a need to “do” stuff because Jesus has done it all. Be sure to get out and tell people about Jesus – our great Doer! Lord God, thank You that Jesus has done it all! He has accomplished everything necessary to reconcile us to You. Now, all we need to do is to believe. May we use wisdom in how we spend our time and may we get out and tell others about this good news. To Your glory. Amen.
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Third Wave Effective Altruism, published by Ben West on June 17, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. This is a frame that I have found useful and I'm sharing in case others find it useful. EA has arguably gone through several waves: Waves of EA (highly simplified model — see caveats below) First waveSecond waveThird waveTime period2010-20172017-20232023-??Primary constraintMoneyTalent ???Primary call to actionDonations to effective charitiesCareer changePrimary target audienceMiddle-upper-class peopleUniversity students and early career professionalsFlagship cause areaGlobal health and developmentLongtermismMajor hubsOxford > SF Bay > Berlin (?)SF Bay > Oxford > London > DC > Boston The boundaries between waves are obviously vague and somewhat arbitrary. This table is also overly simplistic – I first got involved in EA through animal welfare, which is not listed at all on this table, for example. But I think this is a decent first approximation. It's not entirely clear to me whether we are actually in a third wave. People often overestimate the extent to which their local circumstances are unique. But there are two main things which make me think that we have a “wave” which is distinct from, say, mid 2022: Substantially less money, through a combination of Meta stock falling, FTX collapsing, and general market/crypto downturns AI safety becoming (relatively) mainstream If I had to choose an arbitrary date for the beginning of the third wave, I might choose March 22, 2023, when the FLI open letter on pausing AI experiments was published. It remains to be seen if public concern about AI is sustained – Superintelligence was endorsed by a bunch of fancy people when it first came out, but they mostly faded away. If it is sustained though, I think EA will be in a qualitatively new regime: one where AI safety worries are common, AI safety is getting a lot of coverage, people with expertise in AI safety might get into important rooms, and where the field might be less neglected. Third wave EA: what are some possibilities? Here are a few random ideas; I am not intending to imply that these are the most likely scenarios. Example future scenarioPolitics and Civil SocietyForefront of weirdnessReturn to non-AI causesDescription of the possible “third wave” — chosen to illustrate the breadth of possibilitiesThere is substantial public appetite to heavily regulate AI. The technical challenges end up being relatively easy. The archetypal EA project is running a grassroots petition for a moratorium on AI.AI safety becomes mainstream and "spins out" of EA. EA stays at the forefront of weirdness and the people who were previously interested in AI safety turn their focus to digital sentience, acausal moral trade, and other issues that still fall outside the Overton window.AI safety becomes mainstream and "spins out" of EA. AI safety advocates leave EA, and vibes shift back to “first wave” EA.Primary constraintPolitical willResearchMoneyPrimary call to actionVoting/advocacyResearchDonationsPrimary target audienceVoters in US/EUFuture researchers (university students)Middle-upper class peopleFlagship cause areaAI regulationDigital sentienceAnimal welfare Where do we go from here? I'm interested in organizing more projects like EA Strategy Fortnight. I don't feel very confident about what third wave EA should look like, or even that there will be a third wave, but it does seem worth spending time discussing the possibilities. I'm particularly interested in claims that there isn't, or shouldn't be, a third wave of EA (i.e. please feel free to disagree with the whole model, argue that we're still in wave 2, argue we might be moving towards wave 3 but shouldn't be, etc.). I'm also interested in generating cruxes and forecasts about those cruxes. A lot of these are about the counterfactual v...
Cultivating a network of professional contacts is arguably one of the best things you can do for your business — and for yourself. Working in real estate, my sphere of influence is what drives my business. Whether you are a wholesaler, flipper, or buy and hold landlord, the better you are at networking, the more your business will thrive. Here are some tips I've put into practice to build my network. As with anything worth doing, it takes time, but you will begin to reap the benefits before you know it — I definitely did! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: The current alignment plan, and how we might improve it | EAG Bay Area 23, published by Buck on June 8, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. I gave a talk at EAG SF where I tried to describe my current favorite plan for how to align transformatively powerful AI, and how I thought that this plan informs current research prioritization. I think this talk does a reasonable job of representing my current opinions, and it was a great exercise for me to write it. I have one major regret about this talk, which is that my attitude towards the risks associated with following the proposed plan now seems way too blasé to me. I think that if labs deploy transformative AI in the next ten years after following the kind of plan I describe, there's something like 10-20% chance that this leads to AI takeover. Obviously, this is a massive amount of risk. It seems totally unacceptable to me for labs to unilaterally impose this kind of risk on the world, from both the longtermist perspective and also from any common-sense perspective. The potential benefits of AGI development are massive, but not massive enough that it's worth accepting massive risk to make the advent of AGI happen a decade sooner. I wish I'd prefixed the talk by saying something like: "This is not the plan that humanity deserves. In almost all cases where AI developers find themselves in the kind of scenario I described here, I think they should put a lot of their effort into looking for alternative options to deploying their dangerous models with just the kinds of safety interventions I was describing here. From my perspective, it only makes sense to follow this kind of plan if the developers are already in exceptionally dire circumstances which were already a massive failure of societal coordination." So if I think that this plan is objectively unacceptable, why did I describe it? Substantially, it's just that I had made the unforced error of losing sight of how objectively terrible a 10-20% chance of AI takeover is. This is partially because my estimate of x-risk from AI used to be way higher, and so 10-20% intuitively feels pretty chill and low to me, even though obviously it's still objectively awful. I spend a lot of time arguing with people whose P(AI takeover) is way higher than mine, and so I kind of naturally fall into the role of trying to argue that a plan is more likely to succeed than you might have thought. I realized my error here mostly by talking to Ryan Greenblatt and Beth Barnes. In particular, Beth is focused on developing safety standards that AI labs follow when developing and deploying their AI systems; plans of the type that I described in this talk are probably not able to be robust enough that they would meet the safety standards that Beth would like to have in place. I think of my job as an alignment researcher as trying to do technical research such that AI developers are able to make the best of whatever empirical situation they find themselves in; from this perspective, it's someone else's job to reduce the probability that we end up in a situation where the alignment techniques are under a lot of strain. And so the fact that this situation is objectively unacceptable is often not really on my mind. Since this talk, I've also felt increasingly hopeful that it will be possible to intervene such that labs are much more careful than I was imagining them being in this talk, and I think it's plausible that people who are concerned about AI takeover should be aiming for coordination such that we'd have an overall 1% chance of AI takeover rather than just shooting for getting to ~10%. The main levers here are: Go slower at the end. A lot of the risk of developing really powerful AI comes from deploying it in high-leverage situations before you've had enough time to really understand its propert...
The defamation action brought by Australia's most-decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, has been dismissed from the federal court. The accusations of war crimes, murder and bullying, published by Nine Newspapers, were proved substantially true.
Read transcript Show Notes Show notes for this episode can be found on our website. Mobile Suit Breakdown is written, recorded, and produced within Lenapehoking, the ancestral and unceded homeland of the Lenape, or Delaware, people. Before European settlers forced them to move west, the Lenape lived in New York City, New Jersey, and portions of New York State, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Connecticut. Lenapehoking is still the homeland of the Lenape diaspora, which includes communities living in Oklahoma, Wisconsin, and Ontario. You can learn more about Lenapehoking, the Lenape people, and ongoing efforts to honor the relationship between the land and indigenous peoples by visiting the websites of the Delaware Tribe and the Manhattan-based Lenape Center. Listeners in the Americas and Oceania can learn more about the indigenous people of your area at https://native-land.ca/. We would like to thank The Lenape Center for guiding us in creating this living land acknowledgment. You can subscribe to Mobile Suit Breakdown for free! on fine Podcast services everywhere and on YouTube, visit our website GundamPodcast.com, follow us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, or email your questions, comments, and complaints to gundampodcast@gmail.com. Mobile Suit Breakdown wouldn't exist without the support of our fans and Patrons! You can join our Patreon to support the podcast and enjoy bonus episodes, extra out-takes, behind-the-scenes photos and video, MSB gear, and much more! The intro music is WASP by Misha Dioxin, and the outro is Long Way Home by Spinning Ratio, both licensed under Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 licenses. The recap music is His Last Share of the Stars by Doctor Turtle, used under a CC BY attribution license. All music used in the podcast has been edited to fit the text. Mobile Suit Breakdown provides critical commentary and is protected by the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright law. Gundam content is copyright and/or trademark of Sunrise Inc., Bandai, Sotsu Agency, or its original creator. Mobile Suit Breakdown is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Sunrise, Bandai, Sotsu, or any of their subsidiaries, employees, or associates and makes no claim to own Gundam or any of the copyrights or trademarks related to it. Copyrighted content used in Mobile Suit Breakdown is used in accordance with the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright law. Any queries should be directed to gundampodcast@gmail.com
If you're an adult of a certain age, do on-the-spot questions like “chocolate or…
Alyssa: [00:00:00] Welcome to the Women of Ambition podcast. I'm your host, Alyssa Calder Hulme , and today we are going to be beginning a little bit of a shift in our podcast experience together where we've been examining ambition, how women experience that and talk about that. And we're gonna continue on that same path, but I really want to start looking at how culture, ethnicity, religion, all these different things that influence our socialization, affect the way that we think about ambition and manifest it. And then some of the barriers that make it harder to be maybe. Who we want to be. And so today we're gonna look at a little bit a personal experiences of ambition, certainly, but also looking at it within the context of being a Latina in the United States. Today our guest is Natalie Alhonte . [00:01:00] Natalie was born in Bogota, Columbia and moved to the US when she was six months old. During her upbringing, she always had a passion for languages, storytelling, culture, and intersection of public policy and entrepreneurship. She moved to Washington, DC in 2001 to attend American University in their school of international service. After graduating, she began a career in global public affairs, including leading the work. For clients looking to build campaigns around ideas, not just products. After that, she moved to New York City to build a social good incubator working directly with Ariana Huffington, while in New York. She also hired, she was also hired to assist with all aspects of communication for the Brazilian government ahead of the World Cup and the Rio Olympics. Wow. Natalie then returned to Washington to help build the Latin American. Latin America Center at the Atlantic Council for her former boss, Peter. Natalie: Schechter Alyssa: Schechter. Okay, thank you. She's now the director of strategy for the Latin America Practice [00:02:00] Group at Wilkie. Also founded by a Latin. Latina and an investor in immigrant foods, a gastro advocacy restaurant dedicated to celebrating the contribution of immigrants to the United States, and she resides in Salt Lake City, Utah. Not too far from me with her husband son, Sammy and their two dogs. Thank you so much for being here today, Natalie. Natalie: Thank you so much for having me, Alyssa. Alyssa: Sorry If I, I messed up some of those words there. Reading and podcasting at the same time is rough. I'm used to just kind of going off the cuff. Natalie: It's hard. There's a lot of tongue twisters Alyssa: I'm also very, very aware that you are trilingual, at least correct Portuguese, Spanish, and English, and so, I have very minuscule knowledge of those languages, but my pronunciation is horrible at this point. No. So please forgive me and correct me. Please correct me. Natalie: Yes, absolutely. I, yeah, we're here to learn from each other. [00:03:00] Absolutely. Yes. Alyssa: Well, thank you so much for being willing to come on the show and talk about just this complex world that, that you live in and that you navigate and that you're so knowledgeable about. So to start, this is our first question we always ask, do you consider yourself to be ambitious? Natalie: Oh, I love this question. And actually I think you know, when I received the invitation to be here with you today, it really set me on sort of a journey of sort of trying that word on. I think it's been a while since I've sort of categorized myself as ambitious, but, you know, really getting familiar with the, the definition and, and. To, its very core and maybe not so much of the archetypes that maybe we have associated with it. I would definitely claim it. I, I would also say I'm very driven a funny story about that. I actually, if I had a memoir, I think I would have. Titled it Driven because I learned to drive so late in life. I actually just learned [00:04:00] to drive six months ago after being, you know, a, a, a true and blue New Yorker. But yeah, so driven, ambitious are definitely things that I would say are part of, of who I am. Ambitious for myself, but also ambitious for others, I think is another thing that I would say. I, I'm one of those people who really. Get so much in really success and. I've seen other people accomplish things like finding their own voice and seeing what they're capable of as well. But the one caveat I would say about ambition is that I would say yes, ambition, but not at any cost. Hmm. I think this is the new, the new learning for being my life. Especially as. I've become more multi-dimensional, becoming a mother becoming a wife, becoming, you know, trying to be a better friend and also just a better, you know, person who takes care of [00:05:00] myself is saying at ambition. But there has to be a very careful consideration about what the impact is on myself, on others. And definitely growing up in New York where there was a little bit more of a cutthroat culture being on the other side of what ambition on the negative side can look like I've always really prided myself in and to, and not being that type of person who will use anything and everything to get ahead. Despite sort of what the repercussions could be on others around me. Alyssa: No, I, I really appreciate you saying that. I've been obviously thinking about this word for a long time now. And I've been tinkering kind of with like another kind of nuance to this word where a lot of people associate ambition with like that competitiveness and like being willing to step on other people to [00:06:00] succeed. Especially cuz I, I've been reentering academia and so there is like a lot of competition. But. Valuing ambition for itself and valuing it for other people and having it be something that is in balance with other values like community and support and You know, your other values that can kind of balance it out, I think is a really, really important part to, to that aspect. So thank you for sharing that. It's interesting to hear a lot of guests come on the show and they're like, yeah, you know, you asked me to be, to come on and I didn't know how I felt about that word, or I'm a little uncomfortable. Calling myself that. And I thought about it and it, it actually fits really well. It's like, this is the why I'm like so interested in this word and this position cuz it's like there's so many layers to what it means and what it implies to people and relationally to other people. So like the part that I, that I'm tinkering with is [00:07:00] that, Ambition is like a drive to do or succeed that for whatever reason is beyond whatever is socially expected, given the context of wherever you're in. So your family, your community, your country, your socioeconomic status, like. There's some kind of a relative piece to that that is informed by who we are. And so that's why like talking about culture is so important because that's where you really learn your values, and that's kind of where all these things get put in reference. So I'm excited to dig into that more today. Natalie: Yes, me too. No, that, I think that sounds right, and I think you're right. Sometimes we have to go back to the very root of a word and really to really understand it because there has been, there are words that are becoming so polarizing and they're misused, and language really matters, you know? Mm-hmm. If if you have. Sort of a feeling about a word. I think it's important to go back and [00:08:00] say, is that really, is that how society, is that the messages that society has given me? Or is that really what, you know, is there a, a purity to that feeling? Is there something that's very connected to values that are part of that feeling? And I think with ambition, it's, you know, it really, to me at least, it's related to courage. And courage, right? It comes from the Latin heart, right cord, which is heart and Spanish. And when you think about how much courage it takes to put yourself in uncomfortable situations, the willingness, the discipline when it comes to self-talk to, to get, to go above what's expected of you. I think it courage and, and sort of ambition or go hand in hand. Alyssa: Yeah, I would, I completely agree with that. It's hard and it, it does take that extra bravery piece for sure. Okay, so [00:09:00] let's talk about your. Beginnings with ambition as a child, as a teen, do you, do you see pieces of that coming through in your early life? Natalie: I, I, absolutely. So I think some of my family's favorite stories you know, about me are just about sort of that independent streak that I always had. Though, you know, in the Latin culture, we're very, we have, we're taught and socialized to be very different differential to our elders and mm-hmm to the people who have traditional relationships of power, sort of like teachers, et cetera. I think my parents did a really great job not sort of oppressing that independent spunk and streak in me to let me be sort of who I was. And I think, you know, some examples they like to tell about this are I had a ice coffee stand. A lot of children had traditional lemonade stands, [00:10:00] but I realized that our house, I, you know, I grew up in Brooklyn and our house was. On the road to sort of main subway stop, and a lot of people would commute in the mornings to go to work. So in the summer, I used to wake up really early and we would brew fresh Colombian coffee and we would, I would go out with my little wooden table and I would sell ice, fresh ice coffee to the commuters as they would head to work. And I tried to have partners, you know, friends on the block be there with me, but nobody had the the drive to be up at. 7:00 AM to do that with me so quickly. You know, there was a rotation of partners that would come and go and nobody would stick. So I really loved the feeling of being there, being useful and being reliable to my. To, to my customers at a really, really young age. So that, I think it's, it's a fun story that [00:11:00] they tell, but I think that's definitely who I am. Someone who likes to be useful, have an impact and sort of doesn't really see anything as impossible for better or for worse. When I was 15, I started to sort of shift that I would say ambition to social good work. And I started an organization when I was 15 years old called Teens for Humanity. And it was dedicated to raising funds and supplies for developing world, especially Latin America given, you know, that my ties. So it was an incredible experience and I think. That's sort of those leadership skills that you start to learn that are inside of you you know, would just continue to grow. But it definitely never felt like anything was impossible. I just would see any task. And the world's my mom likes to say, the world's very small for me, and I feel like that's definitely been a part of[00:12:00] what's informed, sort of my decisions, my dreams, and my goals moving forward. Alyssa: Those are fantastic examples. Holy smokes. I love, I love to visualize you on the corner street hawking your iced coffee and then being in this teen for social justice, like, that's incredible. Natalie: Well, thank you. It, it's, it's been an incredible life and so far and I'm so glad to be able to, Talk about, tell my story because it reminds me of these things. You know, it's been a long time since I thought about them and really connected with them, but definitely inside of me lies a very, very ambitious little nine year old girl who never, who never went away, luckily. Alyssa: That's awesome. Okay, so, and then obviously you've had this like really incredible career path that we're gonna talk about now. But have there been, like growing up, were there clashes with. Culturally I You're a first gener, not even a first generation or [00:13:00] what would you call yourself? An immigrant? Yeah. I, yeah, Natalie: I'm definitely an immigrant. I'm somewhere in between. Yeah, first gen. I think it's, I sort of, I relate a lot to first generation just because I spent so much of my life in the us. And, but. Definitely my son likes to remind me that he's actually the only person born in the United States in our family, the point of pride for him. But yeah, I, I guess somewhere between first gen and, and immigrant. Mm-hmm. Alyssa: And so navigating kind of that, like that transitional space, were there clash points there? Were your parents just really supportive of you being yourself? What was that like as growing up? Natalie: So what's really interesting is that my mom comes from a, you know, medium sized town in Columbia, in the coffee region. Pretty, you know rural I think is the wrong word, but it's sort of like what you [00:14:00] would picture, like the Napa Valley of columbia, beautiful. Rolling mountains. It's, you know, just a beautiful scenery. And my dad was born in Staten Island New York. So he's a New Yorker and up to Jewish parents. Okay. So. In my house. It was a, there was lots of paradox and contradictions. Okay. And mixed signals. So, you know, very typical sort of multi cultural, multi dimensional story. So. I had, I'd say in my home, represented two cultures that were, they couldn't be more different in terms of the value system, styles of communication, sort of the way that sort of the worldview and they were all happening. In real time in my house growing up, I also had the benefit of growing up with my grandparents. My [00:15:00] Jewish grandparents lived living up one floor above us. Oh wow. So they had a lot of influence as well in, I would say on the second floor. But my mom ran our home like a Columbian embassy within our home. It was very I would say You know, the culture of Columbia was very present. It was in the food, it was in our traditions. It was in the way that she ensured that we were connected to our roots and we understood where we came from. And she just, it was. Really important to her that we felt fully Colombian. Instead of sort of half and half, we were 100% Colombian and 100% American at the same time. So I don't know what kind of math that adds up to, but that was sort of how, how I was raised. And I would say that through [00:16:00] that it was, The ex, through that experiment, you would see that there was a lot of mixed messages about what success really looked like. And, and that also had to do with the extended family. So, you know, in my in my household, there was definite co cohesion. But I would say that when we would look at the extended family education was so important on the, you know, Jewish immigrant side and especially given the history. But then in Latin America it was much more about sort of the markers of success were about you know, physical beauty about thinness. About, you know, what, who were you in your social standing? Are you, are you going to be an eligible candidate for good marriage? It was a very mixed bag when it came to that, so there was a lot of pressure both on the side of.[00:17:00] You know, career side, but also on the family side, all happening, I would say a hundred percent volume all at once. So that was sort of the environment in which, you know, I was raised and it taught me to really decode and question mm-hmm. What my own values are, my own thinking. But it also taught me a lot about how strong that intergenerational sort of programming can be in our own lives. Mm-hmm. Alyssa: Wow. That sounds like quite the crucible for self-discovery and. Watching your parents, I would assume, navigate that with lots of other family members around, and then you getting to go and be your own person as well. Natalie: Absolutely. I think that it really wasn't until college, until that I had the vocabulary to understand what. What all of that, you know, all those mixed messages really meant. [00:18:00] And I had the privilege really of studying with, I would say one of the fathers of cultural anthropology, and his name was Dr. Weaver at American University. And he really taught. Us all about what culture shock looks like. Mm-hmm. And how it's not just when you go abroad, but if you're living in a multicultural society. If you are multicultural, how the, how experiencing culture shock can really impact you and you're sort of psychological framework, long term and really all the resilience that it gives you. Because, you know, I, there's by no means do I want. You know, the takeaway to be like being multicultural actually is traumatic. It's not, I mean, it, it gives you so many magical powers. But at the same time, if you don't understand sort of the language around it it, it can. It can be challenging. And so I was grateful to have [00:19:00] the language around understanding and mapping culture and understanding the different components of what makes a culture. I think in the US we're not really even that aware that we have a culture. And so it always shocks people that we have one, but we do, you know, and, and I think that understanding what you know, what those components can really help us. Empowers us to be to, to take, to make the most out of being able to navigate many different cultures. Yeah. Alyssa: Thank you. One of the things that I really wanna focus on today is that kind of culture crossing. I, I'm calling it border crossing because we're talking to you, a Latina woman who literally crossed a border to come here. A lot of your work is international but also as a metaphor of navigating different spaces, navigating that liminal in between space. [00:20:00] Maybe translating between two very different. Social, cultural, linguistical locations, value systems. That is, that I, I think of it as like a superpower in a way that clearly you had to earn and was a lot of work. But it gives you an ability to, like you're saying, see nuance navigate spaces, a code shift Mentally, linguistically, you know, so many, so many different things like that. So let's talk a little bit about how that has impacted your career and your work. I feel like every single point on your resume is a fantastic example of this. But is there, is there a space where you can kind of talk about that, that border crossing experience? Natalie: Absolutely, and I think you know, when I was in college I sort of I knew I wanted to do something international, and I knew that that was [00:21:00] what sparked my joy, was to learn about other cultures and to learn about other ways of life. And just had this insatiable hunger for international things. I mean music and, and food. And I, and I knew I had this ability to be a bridge because I had done it my whole life. I had. Acted that way since I could remember to really help. Sort of be an intermediary when maybe, you know, there's this image that I like where you're holding a beach ball and on the left side it's white and the right side it's black. And you know, both people are screaming at the top of their lungs that what? It's white or black and you're holding it at the middle. So you could sort of see the delineation of both. And that I think, has been a metaphor that I've sort of used throughout my life. And it also gave me the resilience to sort of enter into this. International relations space with global affairs [00:22:00] space, which traditionally is, there's a pretty high bar of entry into those spaces in DC and there's a lot of elitism associated with it. It's a lot about the connections of who you know and what private or prep school you went to and you know who you're father golfs with, and I came to DC with zero of those things, you know, absolutely none of them except all of the knowledge of the that my parents really gave me about my history and where I came from. And I remember. You know, I got hired by this very elite public affairs firm who worked on crisis communications, international campaigns, and really high stakes issues. And my first week just being completely overwhelmed by just how much I didn't know, even though I had already been in DC for four years and lived and breathed [00:23:00] it just. Felt completely like an imposter. And I know that this is something that comes up a lot here on the podcast. Yes, it does. Remember at that time I was working as an assistant to one of the lead partners and he he, I was in there talking about something and I think he said to me something like, you know, I don't want you scheduling me at this specific time. And I said, you know, okay. But he was very mad at me because I had made a mistake on his schedule, and he said I don't need, you're okay. And then I just looked at him and I said, no. I say okay, as if I understand the information. Mm-hmm. And one of the other senior partners heard it and like went running to say, actually, I think she's gonna survive. I had this grit inside of me. This fire. Good for you. So this senior partner tells that story a lot about, [00:24:00] you know, this the fire that it really takes. To be underestimated time and time and time again. And having to look in the eyes of the person that, or under that is your underestimate and not go down, but to just rise above. And it's just something that happens at a moment. But it is, I think, the most crucial thing that I learned because I learned that nothing defines me but me. And if people don't really understand who I am and what are capable of, they just have to wait. They have and they will see and not just, you know, I think that it was, that is definitely a superpower that I got from being misunderstood. People never knew where, where to put me growing up. You know, she's not Latina, but she is, but she speaks Spanish, but she was born in Colombia, but she looks Russian. Like, who are you? What are you? So I was used to. Being misunderstood. And so I take it upon my speech to, to help people [00:25:00] really get to know who I am and what I'm capable of. And so those are the beginnings in public affairs. And just, I grew a lot by being myself. I didn't conform I would say in many ways, which unfortunately is, I think. The story of what is asked of many people who are not traditional or underrepresented in some way. But I really pushed hard to, to go against the grain and there was a space for me to, to be myself. And as my sort of career progressed and the people within the firm saw how I was able to connect with clients. It almost created a boomerang effect where they started to respect me because they could see how I had the decoding gift that you were talking about where mm-hmm. I knew if there was someone who wants to go straight to business, you go straight to [00:26:00] business. If there was someone who wants to get to know you because there's a trust element that needed to happen before you jump straight in, you give them that. You're generous with yourself, you're generous with your time, and you allow them to get to know you on their time, not on what you expect is the timing that it should happen. And I think it was the. This sort of ability to understand those nuances that helped me continue to grow and to manage your position and then to be able to build my own things when I was at the Huffington Post and then being asked to come back to DC by that same senior partner who yell. To come back and help him build a a Latin America think tank in dc. The agility of being able to climb up and climb down constantly were I think things that really have served me well in my career. Alyssa: I love that example. That's so [00:27:00] fantastic. So, so many of the, the things that you just mentioned are topics that I've been thinking with. So that like being, being able to jump between places, but then also weaving between them to kind of create where you get to exist as yourself, even if other people. Can't place you like you're creating your own self. And then being, being a bridge maker and having it be this unique thing that you are bringing to the table because of your values and your, your upbringing and all these things that you have that. Actually helps you in your career and in your personal ambitions, but, but comes from like this culturally located place of community and nuance and like you are able to see and sense things that other people can't, who haven't had to stretch themselves really. Natalie: That's right. And yeah. Oh, and I think that obviously, you know [00:28:00] those are sort of the, the positive baggage that I bring to the table. But I, you know, there are also things that I struggle with and I think that those are also a big part of Understanding the, the importance of being humble, of looking at life as an eternal learner. Because you know, if you're trilingual, you're always gonna mess up a certain sentence or you're always going to like, make something feminine that's masculine and you, this is a life log. You're never gonna be fully fluent, in one language. So I think that's also helped me understand that To understand people, not just by how they communicate in maybe their second or third or fourth language. And, and to be humble about being able to learn from everyone. Cause I think that there's, I've been on the other side where I've seen microaggressions and I've seen people being [00:29:00] underestimated just because maybe English is their second language or they're not able to express as fluently as they can in their native language. So I think that's also the other side as, as well. Alyssa: So how, How do you build resilience to being complete, to being mis can't even think of the right word, but being misunderstood. Underestimated not being legible to people because they can't categorize you. I am sh I know from my personal, smaller experiences with that, that that's really exhausting. So, Can you speak to that a little bit? Natalie: Well, absolutely. I mean, obviously I don't wanna paint the situation with rose colored glasses, right? Because we look at the current state of sort of Latinas in the United States, right? And we see the the mount that we represent as it. Relates to the population versus positions of [00:30:00] leadership. Looking at the C-Suite for example, I mean I wrote down, just jotted down these numbers just because I think they're so super important to talk about, but, you know, Latinos represent 62.5 million people, right? So that's 19% of the population. But when you look at the amount of people in senior leadership, I mean, it goes down. Substantially. So 2% of women are in senior leadership positions are in the board in the boardroom. And, and this are like Forbes, you know, the, the biggest company is ranked by Forbes and 1% if you look just at corporate boards and not at positions of leadership. So there are, there is a real problem, you know, in our society and, and in the way that the game is structured. For the ascension of Latinas. So I think that that's really important to say and[00:31:00] it's important to sort of, to look at what the, you know, kind of what's against us. So we're swimming upstream and mm-hmm. How exhausting it can be. So I would say like, kind of life. Taught me resilience. It it was every time I was not invited, you know, to a pitch meeting or that I had done all the work for and I had to advocate for myself to be there. Or when a client, you know, assumed something went wrong, but hadn't actually looked at his or her email to show that it was, it had been sent and he. These little things where people just automatically assume that you are the one that messed up because they haven't seen enough people that look or sound like you in positions of authority. There's just this thing that happens in their brain when things go wrong. And I think so it is sort of just life that. That teaches us to be resilient. But I think the other big thing, [00:32:00] and this definitely comes from the culture, is the sense of humor. You know, to, there's nothing that can break a tense and difficult moment that you know, nothing that can do that. Like a sense of humor. And that's something I learned from my culture and it's something that I take with me because. You know it, unless we are able to sort of laugh at these terrible things that happen, I mean, maybe not right away, but eventually with communities of people who have who have built things alongside us. I think it's really difficult and participating in spaces like this one, Alyssa, where you, that you're building where people can come and tell their story. I mean, these are the ways that we can sort of take a step back, realize that. What happens to us is not personal. It's not really about, though it feels so personal in the moment. It's not personal because it's a common experience that so many of us have, and you don't have to be, Latinas have experienced this, right? Mm-hmm. I'm sure if you have 10 women all around [00:33:00] in this, in this conversation with us, that everyone could tell a thousand stories just like mine. So I think that's also really important is to, to remind us that if we celebrate who we are, You know, the way my mom celebrated our culture and our house, if we celebrate who we are and somebody doesn't understand or value it, to know that the problems with them and not with us. It's not that our culture is somehow wrong, it's that person just hasn't had the pleasure of understanding our culture and getting to know it better. Alyssa: Thank you. I think that's, that's really true and it's again, how community fits into to achieving, to doing, to building whatever it is that we feel driven to do. And it's, it's such an essential part because. We can't do it alone. I dunno, maybe maybe [00:34:00] a white guy can do it alone. A straight white guy can do it alone, maybe. But more likely there's an invisible community that of support that is not being represented. But those of us who aren't in that dominant. Position of, of privilege and power. We need our community and we need that support to kind of get through it. And I love humor as one of the, one of the tools to, to healing and to health and normalizing something that we're being told is so abnormal. Natalie: Absolutely. Absolutely. Alyssa: Alright. So maybe let's talk a little bit more about the specific areas that you've worked in. You've done, so you've done crisis response work, like you said, you and we talked, mentioned briefly the World Cup and the Olympics. And you were also a TV commentator for us Latin American relations. So you're doing all of this [00:35:00] work with these different places and different value systems. How, like, like I just talking even politically about different countries and navigating those relationships what has that been like to hold maybe two value systems and have to like, make them legible to each other? Yeah, Natalie: no, I think that's a really, really good question. And, you know, I can talk a little bit first about the world cup and the Olympics work. So when I was in New York and I was a new mom I had. A conversation with a former colleague and you know, was really telling her about how burnt out I was feeling. I mean, one of the big characteristics of crisis communication is that you have to be on 24 7 and having to be a new mom. I really felt like it wasn't it wasn't a, I couldn't give 100%. To really anything [00:36:00] and I didn't feel like I was I felt like I was failing, you know? And, and I, I felt like I was sort of the reputation that I had as like the person that was always on it. I just couldn't be that person anymore. And, This friend said to me well, why don't you work with me on this project? The Brazil government is looking for someone to help promote these beautiful destinations in Brazil. And I said, oh my gosh, this sounds like the easiest job on earth. Like, why? You know, is this real? Is this real? Like, and so, well, of course, you know, nothing is ever as good as it sounds because. The largest protests in Brazilian in Brazil's history after the fall of the dictatorship were catalyzed by the overruns in the World Cup and the Olympics. And we were sort of the only us leg, arms and legs on the ground in many of [00:37:00] these spaces. And we thought we were gonna be there, you know, talking about beautiful beaches of Rio de Janeiro. But we were preparing like. Crisis communication decks and sort of media audits about what's being said. And I was accompanying a minister, the minister of sports minister towards them, to the editorial board meetings at the New York Times, at the Wall Street Journal to talk about, you know, stadiums and man, and why there is one and, and just, I had to fire a translator on the spot in one of those meetings because she was just translating the minister. With really just messing up the translation and just like these things, you know, I kept thinking, where's the fun? When is the fun gonna start? Cause this was not fun. This was way more difficult than I had imagined. But it was an amazing experience, of course, as everything is looking back, you know, really to understand. Sort of the power of civil society and having [00:38:00] their voice heard especially in democracies and how important those those protests were to Brazil. So that was a moment where I would say I was kind of thrown into the deep end into, in a really. Amazing moment in Brazil's history. And I think that has helped me really understand like the power of social media the power to, to create movements because WhatsApp and Twitter were so such a big part of kind of building that social movement and really understand the inner workings of a government a lot better. So that's definitely an example of, I would say where you, I I was definitely buckling my seatbelt in, in that situation, but it was, it was a really intense, but great time to learn. Mm-hmm. Alyssa: Sounds complicated and [00:39:00] exciting and exhausting all at once. Natalie: Yes. Yes. Absolutely. My Portuguese definitely got a lot better after that writing and reading a lot, and Portuguese and so that's always a great, a great outcome. Well, that's wonderful. Alyssa: So. If working in these different spaces with these different groups of people, do you see, do you see the nuance in, in value in maybe how ambition is perceived in different places in Latin America versus the United States? Can you talk a little bit about that, kind of maybe on a more broad level, and then if there is a gender component that you saw, I'd appreciate hearing your perspective. Natalie: Absolutely. Well, I think what's really interesting, and I think a lot of people consider themselves, you know, Latin Americanists They have trouble with Brazil. They have trouble sort of becoming a part of the ingroup in Brazil because the country of [00:40:00] Brazil is such a massive place and it's been sort of because it speaks Portuguese and speaks Spanish and sort of has a unique history and culture, it really is isolated. From the rest of the world. So the amount of, I would say trust that a person that is working in Brazil can can obtain just by understanding the culture, understanding the language, the basic customs is incredible. It's not the same as the rest of, of Latin American in many ways because it isn't Americanized. Mm-hmm. So like Columbia, we've always had a lot of connection. Mexico, you go to Mexico, there's always been a ton of connection. Between the United States and and you know, better and worse, right? There's been mm-hmm. Negative impacts that the US have ha has had, but also it's just, there's a very close relationship. Brazil is different. It's very isolated in many ways. So I would say that taking the time to really understand the culture, [00:41:00] and I was lucky, I studied abroad in Brazil. My husband is Brazilian, so that's another big component of understanding the culture. But. I think there is a, there's a coup, there's so many levels. I mean, you and I, you know, we were talking before about the sort of high context, low context cultures, the to be cultures, the to-do cultures, you know? Alyssa: Do you wanna share that a little bit? Because it, it fits so well with what I'm re learning and researching right now. Natalie: Yes. Yeah. So when I was you know, Learning more about cultural anthropology. I think one of the coolest ways and, and I think there's more contemporary work on this as well there's a book called The Culture Map that I think has gained a lot of popularity is really understanding different cultures and sort of where they fall on broad questions. And these two broad questions are, Sort of the, something called a high context culture in a low context culture or a to be or todo culture. So what that [00:42:00] means is you know, there are, if you're in a part of a to-do culture, it's really about efficiency. It's about sort of what you achieve. It's about sort of an individual perspective of achievement. And it's very low context, meaning that, Even if you were dropped in that country and you're doing business for the first time in that country and you were someone who sort of was pretty literal and direct, you would do really well in that country. In terms of relationships as well, when you are looking at, you know, the US as a part of that, I would say Germany I think is a pretty, when we're looking at architecture, He's always sort of looked at at Switzerland. On the other side of that are the to be cultures or the high context cultures where these are cultures that have a lot of gray. Lines, there's a lot of subtexts, a lot of focus on [00:43:00] where, who are your, who is your family? You know, where did you sort of, where do you fall in like in sort of the social casts within a country. And those are the cultures where it takes a long time to really understand the nuance to be effective at communications because there's so many unwritten rules. About what you can do and what you can't do. So I would say Brazil is very much, and all of Latin America is on that sort of the high context to to be scale. But Brazil, I would think, I think is at the very top of that because they have so much of their own way of develop of, you know, sort of. Their own rules and customs that are unique to Brazil. There's no other places that you'll be able to find it. And those who don't really understand the culture have a lot of trouble being effective in it. And those who take the [00:44:00] time, you know, even to learn to sort of basic Portuguese about the differences between the different regions, the history understanding where you give one kiss and where you give two; we use our small protocol type. Things, but they make a huge difference in a culture like that where your relationships and sort of who you are on that scale mean everything. And I think that it's important to say that both cultures are both humane and inhumane at the same time. Because in a to-do culture, it's all about. What you achieve, it's not really about who you are, but in a to be culture, it's really the hard part is social mobility. You know, if you're born into a certain class or a cast, you know it's hard to move up. It's hard to be seen as other because you are sort of as ascribed of value based on sort of where you fall in that. scale. So those are super important nuance I think that I try to keep in in mind when I [00:45:00] am doing business internationally. And where I, when I'm working, collaborating across borders is to really understand those nuances and to, to continue to learn. You know, one tip I always give to people is just do a Google search, A Google news search for that country. The day before you talk to somebody from that country and see what's going on in the news. Take five minutes. I think as Americans we're, we're not really conditioned to do that. But it's, it just goes such a long way to be able to build relationships for those high context cultures when you at least take the time to know. A little bit about what's going on, what's current, and ask questions and be curious. I think people, it really goes a long way to building those relationships. Yeah. Alyssa: That's so interesting. That's a really, really good tip. I'm wondering if, you know if you know the answer to this question, maybe you don't, but how the [00:46:00] different indigenous populations kind of affect. The differences in the regions. And then of course, you know how colonization has kind of shaped the culture of different countries and different regions. Can you speak to that at all? Natalie: I mean, there are, I can speak more in terms of the presence of sort of Generally right now that there's, yeah, I would say a moment where we are celebrating indigenous culture in a way that we really haven't before. I think that in our minds, we were all, we all felt very separate. You know, like we, we would learn about these indigenous cultures, the Inca, the Mayans, the Aztecs, and we would look at them. Right in Brazil UA Paraguay, and we would sort of look at and our, you know, our indigenous in the United States where We would see each of these cultures as a really, a small and isolated [00:47:00] pocket. But I think as people have studied them more, and I think John Zamo, if you haven't seen his sort of one man show when he talks about this, you know, 97% of the d of indigenous cultures from the top of the Americas to the very bottom. Is the same. So we have this unique shared culture. Though the co obviously there's nuances, but think that there was, it's a very sort of colonist and European mindset to see each of them as unique and separate because it takes away the power from the holistic sort of story about this continent and about sort of the indigenous culture. And I think some countries have been really great about conserving and celebrating the history. I think no cult culture has been great at it. I, I should say. But there, yes, yes. Let's be [00:48:00] clear. We've all been terrible, Alyssa: but we've all been terrible. Some have maybe been worse for longer. Natalie: Absolutely. And you know, you, if you look at, there's this beautiful museum in Mexico City called the Mu Museum of Anthropology. And it's this beautiful, giant, gorgeous museum dedicated to understanding the roots of the Mayan societies and really teaching an Aztec and really teaching people about that history. Our history, right? If, if you are a part of the Americas, it's, it's, it's a collective experience to understand who we are. And so I would love to see that in the United States, and there's a beautiful Smithsonian museum. But I don't think that we have this widespread understanding of how we connect in terms of our shared history with our indigenous people and. In some countries, like [00:49:00] if you look in the southern cone the eradication of the indigenous populations was. Almost absolute, you know, it's genocide. And so each of these countries has had their own unique story with, with sort of celebrating those roots or sweeping it under the rug, as I think probably happens a lot. But it, in it is influenced, I mean, I think. Right now, I think it was a couple of years ago, the first time that Vogue, Mexico had an indigenous woman on the cover cause of Roma, the movie Roma. And I mean, it was a huge uproar. I mean, in a great way because. A lot of people didn't say, didn't realize we had never seen that before. Mm-hmm. You know, and, and the lack of social mobility I think has been, it's been really damaging. But I think that, you know, in terms of your question about sort of how that has [00:50:00] shaped our identity Countries that celebrate and understand those roots I think are much more connected to, to who we all are, you know, as a collective Americas and in Columbia, I can speak to that. There is this sort of movement now to Bring forward a lot of the replicas of indigenous jewelry. I know that not all of your readers can see it, but I'm actually wearing one right now where we have beautiful gold pieces in Columbia you know, it was called, right? Mm-hmm. Because of the gold. So much gold came from Columbia and the we're starting to to sort of assimilate that. That celebration of indigenous culture into you know, quote unquote mainstream, which was European culture for so long, and get curious and, and get, and I hope to see that [00:51:00] continue. I definitely don't think we're there by any means, but especially if you look at sort of political power, right? Mm-hmm. How, how European white male. It is. But there are, I think, beautiful social movements that are happening across the Americas to sort of tell those stories and to and to better understand them. Yeah. Thank you. Alyssa: Yeah, they're certainly a long way to go there, and I think we are better when we embrace our history and open our eyes to it because we have to be able to understand the ongoing effects. Of our, of my place. Like I have mostly colonizer ancestry and some indigenous ancestry. And it's, it's a lot to confront for myself and for my family. But denying that and pretending that I'm just here of my own volition is just, it's totally ignorant and it just perpetuates [00:52:00] ongoing harm, and I lose out on the beauty and the, the dreaming and the, the community and the connection and things that I, I am now being able to reincorporate with that, like wider, wider eyes, a wider embracive truth. Natalie: Absolutely. And, and we're so much better when we know our history, you know? Mm-hmm. And. I think our ancestors, they want us to know, they want us to know the history. And because if we are, we stand on their shoulders. I think that's a really important thing to because I think so many of us, we have oppressive and oppressor oppressed And oppressor genetics. You know, and if we're, if you are on the America's continent, there's going to be, it's, it's a mixed bag. But I think the more we know, the more we don't repeat history hopefully.[00:53:00] Alyssa: Yeah. I'm with you there. And that's kind of where I'm coming at this project of ambition, of trying to figure out like, what does it mean to different people? What does it mean to different cultures? Is it. Competitive have to step on other people to achieve. Can it be something that it is communally beneficial? And I think it can, but we have to really unpack a lot of that, like generational trauma and colonizer mindset and the ignorance that we've allowed and supported and that we're all, you know, complicit into one degree or another. Cuz. There are a lot of toxic things that originally were really beautiful or, or are really healthy in other spaces that we can reincorporate and heal with and learn from. So thank you for sharing all of your experiences today. Oh, Natalie: it's my pleasure. It's been such a pleasure speaking with you today, and I think this project is such an [00:54:00] important one. I hope we'll all own the word ambition a little bit more in healthy way, in a good way, in a healthy way, Alyssa: in balance with our, our values and our community and all those things. Absolutely. In closing, is there anything that you would like to say to ambitious Latinas out there speaking to them directly maybe? Natalie: Yes, Absolutely. I mean, I think that. The, the, our time is coming. I think if we just look at the demographics, if we look at sort of the amazing influence that we've been able to have on it, on this country as Latinos living in the us our time is coming to really to shine. So it's gonna be, It's gonna be upon us to be ready as, as that moment appears. And I just wanna give a huge shout out to Julissa ak, who's [00:55:00] a Read, who's a book that, who wrote a book called, you Sound like a White Girl. I'm currently reading that. I suggest it and I suggest America Ferreras Ted Talk so much for those who haven't listened to it, to really understand our superpower as Latinas. And just, you know, thank you for having me here today. Alyssa: Thank you so much. Oh, so, so good. Do you have any current projects or things you wanna plug? I think you have a restaurant going on right now. Natalie: Yeah. So I am an investor in a restaurant in Washington DC called Immigrant Food. Our flagship is half a block from the White House, and obviously it wasn't a coincidence that we opened it during the Trump administration when there was so much negative rhetoric about immigrants forgetting that we are all immigrants if you're not indigenous. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. And we're all here. So no, definitely if you're in Washington DC check out immigrant food. Also if [00:56:00] you are you'd like to connect, so please feel free to connect with me on LinkedIn, Natalie ote on LinkedIn and just thank you so much for having me here. Awesome. Alyssa: Thank you. That is, that's a quite the, the delicious, ambitious little pump to end on. So thank you so much. And yeah, thank you. I am sure everyone is just gonna be so thrilled to listen to. So thank you so much for coming on. Thank you. Thanks so much for listening to this episode of the Women of Ambition podcast. Natalie was such a fantastic guest. We covered so many different topics and ideas that I wanna continue to expand on and explore throughout our podcast time together, especially as we look at how social locations change the way we view the world, they inform our values and inform. What resources we have access to. So those are some of the things we're gonna continue to look at on the podcast. If you would like to read a transcription of the podcast or share it that way, I'm going to figure out a way to add the transcription to my [00:57:00] website, women of admission podcast.com. This will allow guests to go back and annotate and edit anything that they wanna clarify or comment on. So if that's helpful to you, please let me know. It is quite a labor. Of work to transcribe. So I'm gonna try and do that more moving forward if that is helpful to anybody out there. So just let me know, drop me a line if that's something that is beneficial. You can also interact more with the podcast on Instagram. My handle is Women of Admission podcast. So check us out there and we will continue to have some really awesome guests moving forward and some new and exciting things over the next couple of months. So look out for those. Thanks so much for listening.
The U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority has confirmed that it intends to block Microsoft's megabucks Activision acquisition, concluding that such a merger would create “…the most powerful operator” in the cloud gaming market.
In this episode of Quah (Q & A), Sal, Adam & Justin answer four Pump Head questions drawn from last Sunday's Quah post on the @mindpumpmedia Instagram page. Mind Pump Fit Tip: Using the CGM device as a tool to lose weight. (2:14) The controversy surrounding Ozempic/semaglutide. (11:42) Psyop's for hire. (19:24) Crazy facts on Genghis Kahn. (26:04) Lunchables coming to a school cafeteria near you. (33:13) Fun Facts with Justin: The Venezuelan Poodle Moth. (35:03) Competitiveness amongst the guy's and their wives. (40:28) Shout out to Dad Jokes. (50:32) How Justin's uses the whey protein from Legion in his breakfast smoothie. (50:47) #Quah question #1 - What are the best bracing/breathing cues for deadlifts that you've taught clients in the past? (55:44) #Quah question #2 - How do you train around a sprained ankle? Only train waist up sitting or is it ok to do a leg curl/leg extension? I guess not training the ok leg only so there is no imbalances going on right? (1:00:23) #Quah question #3 - How do I increase protein but not fat? I'm trying to hit my protein goals but always exceed my fat goals. (1:06:40) #Quah question #4 - What do you hope Mind Pump's legacy will be? (1:13:38) Related Links/Products Mentioned Visit NutriSense for the exclusive offer for Mind Pump listeners! **Code MINDPUMP at checkout** Visit Legion Athletics for the exclusive offer for Mind Pump listeners! **Code MINDPUMP at checkout** March Promotion: “Time-crunch Bundle” (MAPS 15 Minutes, MAPS Anywhere, MAPS Prime + Eat for Performance eBook ALL for only $99.99!! Mind Pump # 1815: Improving Fat Loss, Muscle Gain And Fitness With Continuous Glucose Monitors Americans desperate for the hot weight-loss drug Ozempic are turning to Canada and Mexico because they can't afford it at home Mind Pump # 2017: The Best Peptides For Fat Loss With Dr. William Seeds My First Million Podcast Lunchables are going to be rolled out directly to students. Here's what's in them 10 Venezuelan Poodle Moth Facts Venezuelans report big weight losses in 2017 as hunger hits Mind Pump Rentals – Utah Property 4 Cues To Improve Your Deadlift With Eugene Teo Ben Pollack Shares The Proper Deadlift Setup (AVOID MISTAKES) | Mind Pump Mind Pump # 1830: Five Steps To Determine Your Ideal Caloric Intake Mind Pump Podcast – YouTube Mind Pump Free Resources People Mentioned Dr. William Seeds (@williamseedsmd) Instagram Sam Parr (@thesamparr) Twitter Dad Jokes (@Dadsaysjokes) Twitter Max Lugavere (@maxlugavere) Instagram Layne Norton, Ph.D. (@biolayne) Instagram
Week of: 3-20-2023 Xbox Gaming News, Releases and A Fun Fact
A sandstorm that originated in Mongolia on Tuesday swept through vast swaths of northern China, including Beijing and Tianjin, causing heavy pollution, reducing visibility substantially and disrupting public transportation.3月21日，起源于蒙古的沙尘暴席卷了包括北京和天津在内的中国北方大片地区，造成严重污染，能见度大幅降低，公共交通中断。The storm, which according to the National Meteorological Center was the strongest in China so far this year, affected several provincial-level regions. Satellite images showed that by Wednesday morning, it had covered 854,000 square kilometers, roughly twice the size of the US state of California.据国家气象中心称，这是今年迄今为止中国最强的风暴，影响了几个省级地区。卫星图像显示，截至周三上午，它已经覆盖了85.4万平方公里，大约是美国加利福尼亚州面积的两倍。The affected areas included the Inner Mongolia autonomous region and Hebei, Gansu, Shaanxi, Liaoning, Jilin and Heilongjiang provinces, besides Beijing and Tianjin municipalities. Visibility remained lower than 1,000 meters in some parts of northern China as the NMC issued a yellow alert, the lowest in the three-tier weather warning system.受影响地区包括内蒙古自治区、河北、甘肃、陕西、辽宁、吉林和黑龙江，以及北京和天津。在中国北方部分地区，能见度仍低于1000米，国家气象中心发布了黄色预警，这是三级天气预警系统中最低的预警级别。The level of PM10 — inhalable particles with diameters of 10 micrometers or less — increased rapidly and reached a peak concentration of 1,667 micrograms per cubic meter around 6 am on Wednesday, according to the Beijing Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center.根据北京生态环境监测中心的数据，PM10 (直径小于等于10微米的可吸入颗粒) 的浓度迅速上升，并在3月22日早上6点左右达到了1667微克/立方米的峰值。On days when air quality is good, the PM10 level usually remains below 150 micrograms per cubic meter.空气质量良好时，PM10水平通常保持在每立方米150微克以下。The Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control issued an advisory on its official WeChat account, urging people with chronic respiratory illnesses to avoid outdoor activities and recommended that commuters wear brightly colored clothes to avoid road accidents amid poor visibility.北京市疾病预防控制中心在其官方微信公众号上发布了一份建议，敦促慢性呼吸道疾病患者避免户外活动，并建议通勤者穿颜色鲜艳的衣服，以避免在能见度低的情况下发生交通事故。The capital's parks suspended operations of boats and cable cars to ensure the safety of visitors.首都的公园暂停了船只和缆车的运营，以确保游客的安全。The sandstorm will move southeast and weaken, starting from dusk on Wednesday, the NMC said, adding that the air quality in Beijing is expected to return to "a good level" after that.国家气象中心表示，从3月22日黄昏开始，沙尘暴将向东南移动并减弱，并补充说，在那之后，北京的空气质量预计将恢复到“良好水平”。Hohhot, the capital of the Inner Mongolia autonomous region, maintained an orange alert, the second-highest level in the weather warning system.内蒙古自治区首府呼和浩特保持橙色预警，这是天气预警系统的第二高级别。Zhang Tao, chief forecaster at the NMC, said that strong winds blowing over loose sand and soil particles create the conditions for sand and dust storms.国家气象中心首席预报员张涛表示，强风吹过松散的沙子和土壤颗粒，为沙尘暴创造了条件。Higher temperatures in spring loosen the topsoil, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. Strong winds blowing over deserts in Mongolia, western Inner Mongolia and Gansu, carry the particles up, Zhang explained.春季的高温会使表层土壤变松，尤其是在干旱和半干旱地区。大风吹过蒙古、内蒙古西部和甘肃的沙漠，将这些颗粒带了上来。Since the beginning of March, China has experienced four rounds of "dusty weather", which is more than normal, the NMC's chief forecaster said. It is hard to say whether there will be more such weather conditions this spring, but the center will keep close watch in April and May, he added.国家气象中心首席预报员表示，自3月初以来，中国已经经历了四轮“沙尘天气”，这比正常情况要多。他补充说，今年春天是否会出现更多这样的天气还很难说，但中心将在4月和5月密切关注。Last spring, northern China had eight rounds of dusty weather. From 2000 to 2021, there were 10.7 rounds of dusty weather on average, according to the 2022 China Climate Bulletin.去年春天，中国北方出现了8轮沙尘天气。根据《2022年中国气候公报》，从2000年到2021年，平均有10.7轮沙尘天气。From 1981 to 2010, Beijing had an annual average of 2.4 days of dust and sandstorms in March. The capital's longest sandstorm of this century lasted for nine days.从1981年到2010年，北京每年3月的沙尘暴天数平均为2.4天。北京本世纪持续时间最长的沙尘暴持续了9天。Substantially英 [səbˈstænʃəli] 美 [səbˈstænʃəli]adv. 大量地concentration英 [ˌkɒns(ə)nˈtreɪʃ(ə)n] 美 [ˌkɑːns(ə)nˈtreɪʃ(ə)n]n. 浓度
Matt and Ash talk more quantumania. Was Cassie fleshed out enough? What kind of Kang do we want? Who should have stepped through that portal?Patreonhttps://www.patreon.com/mcucast Join The Stranded Panda Community!https://www.strandedpanda.com/Facebook Group:https://www.facebook.com/groups/spchat
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: EU Food Agency Recommends Banning Cages, published by Ben West on February 21, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. Some key recommendations (all direct quotes from either here or here): Birds should be housed in cage-free systems Avoid all forms of mutilations in broiler breeders Avoid the use of cages, feed and water restrictions in broiler breeders Limit the growth rate of broilers to a maximum of 50 g/day. Substantially reduce the stocking density to meet the behavioural needs of broilers. My understanding is that the European Commission requested these recommendations as a result of several things, including work by some EA-affiliated animal welfare organizations, and it is now up to them to propose legislation implementing the recommendations. This Forum post from two years ago describes some of the previous work that got us here. It's kind of cool to look back on the "major looming fight" that post forecasts and see that the fight is, if not won, at least on its way. Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org.
Ali Aminian, MD, Director of Cleveland Clinic's Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, joins the Cancer Advances podcast to talk about his study on how bariatric surgery can significantly lower a patient's risk of developing obesity-related cancers. Listen as Dr. Aminian explains how the study saw that with significant weight loss, the risk was reversible across race, sex, and age of the patients.
Exit strategies for our option-selling trades is a critical aspect for successful investing. When there is a precipitous drop in share price such that it is trading below the (once) deep in-the-money LEAPS strike, we can close the entire position or roll-down to lower but still out-of-the-money short call strikes. This video will provide a real;-life example as how to manage such a scenario. BCI Package, our Best and most Comprehensive Investment package: https://thebluecollarinvestor.com/minimembership/bci-investor-program/ BECOME A BCI MEMBER TODAY: https://www.thebluecollarinvestor.com/membership/ SEE BCI COURSE & PRODUCTS : https://thebluecollarinvestor.com/store/ STOCKS,TRADING,STOCK MARKET,COVERED CALLS,covered call writing,Axsome,Therapeutics,Ellman Calculator,gap-up,cost-to-close,implied volatility,Alpha,Beta,seeking,alpha,cost-basis,time-value,intrinsic- value,put-selling,collar calculator,put calculator,stock option,facebook stock,amazon stock,investing,options,Option,option buyer,strike price,in the money,in the money coverd call,out of the money covered call,covered call writing exit strategies
#AndySchectman: #Silver Premiums Have Come In Substantially In October and early November, the physical silver premiums were in many cases as high as they've ever been on many products. There were also product shortages in many types of silver coins and bars, and American #SilverEagles were close to 100% over spot. Although fortunately the premiums have come in over the past 5-6 weeks, and in today's weekly physical silver report, Andy Schectman of Miles Franklin talks about the changes in the premiums, and how the market is evolved over the past month. He talks about why the premiums have come down, what's still available, and whether he thinks the current environment will be maintained. So to find out the latest from the front-lines of the physical silver market, click to watch this video now! - To get more information, or to buy or sell physical silver or gold, email: Arcadia@MilesFranklin.com - To join our free email list and never miss a video click here: https://arcadiaeconomics.com/email-signup/ - To get on the waiting list for your very own ´Silver Chopper Ben´ sterling silver figurine click here: https://arcadiaeconomics.com/get-a-chopper-ben/ - To get your paperback or audio copy of The Big Silver Short go to: https://arcadiaeconomics.com/thebigsilvershort/ Find Arcadia Economics content on these sites: YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ArcadiaEconomics Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ArcadiaEconomics Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/kgpeiwO1dhxX/ LBRY/Odysee - https://odysee.com/@ArcadiaEconomics:5 Listen to Arcadia Economics on your favorite Podcast platforms: Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/75OH2PpgUpriBA5mYf5kyY Apple - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arcadia-economics/id1505398976 Google-https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9teXNvdW5kd2lzZS5jb20vcnNzLzE2MTg5NTk1MjMzNDVz Anchor - https://anchor.fm/arcadiaeconomics Amazon - https://podcasters.amazon.com/podcasts Follow Arcadia Economics on these social platforms Twitter - https://twitter.com/ArcadiaEconomic Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/arcadiaeconomics/ To see the evidence of manipulative behavior in the silver market (as well as how you can send it to your local regulators and Congressional representatives) click here: https://arcadiaeconomics.com/cftc-complaint/ - To sign the petition to ban JP Morgan from having any involvement in the silver industry click here: https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/ban-jp-morgan-from-trading-gold-and-silver #silver #silverprice And remember to get outside and have some fun every once in a while!:) (URL0VD)Subscribe to Arcadia Economics on Soundwise
A study has come out showing the results of 1700 new podcasters, and 41% saw their new podcast as an opportunity for additional income, with 29% of those wanting to be their main source of income. There are people who will charge you THOUSANDS of dollars (in three easy payments) who will GUARANTEE a top spot in podcasts apps. They quote their listennotes stats (even when they know they are bogus, see video 1 and video 2) and promote affiliate products - not because they are good - but because they have the highest commission. I'm not them. Today I reveal the truth - even if it is not what you want to hear. So The Plan is Start a Podcast and Get Advertisers? Less than 10% of podcasters get the number of downloads per episode after 30 days to get a host ready from a "big sponsor." source Programmatic ads have a CPM that may be around $12 CPM (cost per thousand downloads) source The median number of podcasters is around 150 (per libsyn)and the average is around 1500. The median on Buzzsprout is 30. The aver CPM for Advertisecast is $24ish and they require 10,000 downloads per episode. source Please note, I'm not saying smaller shows with 1000 downloads an episode can't get a sponsor. With podcasting, it always "Depends" on your topic. If you DO have a hyper niche or hyper-local podcast you can charge more than the rates above. Bruce Chamoff from the NYC Podcast Network I first ran into Bruce when he invited me to be a speaker at his Podknow 2023 Online Event. I wanted to talk to Bruce because I don't see eye to eye on some of the things he does, and I wanted to no more. One was having a network where the topics weren't related. Brice started the NYC Podcast Network back in 2005 (it was the Long Island Podcast Network back then). He has slowly broadened the scope and plans on rebranding it to the Global Podcast Network. Bruce is monetizing by having podcaster pay to be promoted on his site, which gets 20-25 thousand unique visitors a month. That would put him in the top 20% (Source). You can join for free or pay a small monthly fee to be featured on the site. Bruce monitors all the activity on the website so you can evaluate your traffic from the site and decide if it's worth the fee, or just stay with a free plan (or leave - I'm somewhat worried about having another site competing with YOUR website) Certain plans on the site allow you to link to our show on popular podcast platforms, as well as monetization links, and link to your website (which you can do on your own site for free). Bruce likens it to a social media site based around podcasting. What makes his site different is his level of categorization. You can sign up for free, try it, and check your stats to see if this works for you. My "Thanks Dave" Engagement Experiment For three weeks, I swapped out my typical School of Podcasting Advertisement and askws people if they felt I had given value over the years (and they had never joined the School of Podcasting) if they would give some of that value back by going to www.schoolofpodcasting.com/thanks Six people said "Thanks" and gave some value back (Ranging from $5-$25). Steve at Wayword studios Letitia Evans James Cridland From Podnews Craig Wealand from Ingles Podcast DR from Mouthy Broad Media Try Price from Front Porch Studios If you take 6/1500 that is .04% (not 4% POINT ZERO 4) I've mentioned in the past that I've heard the VERY popular show Radiolab do a "Fundraiser" type episode trying to get UP TO 1% of their audience to donate. When I've spoken to other people in the industry, a good engagement level is 2-3%. If I count the people who are Patrons and Students, I'm somewhere near that ballpark. Mentioned in This Episode Building a Podcast Network Behind the Scenes of the Trek.fm Network How to Start a Podcast Network: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly Dave's Listener Survey Join the Live Focus Group For the School of Podcasting Question of the Month Where I Will Be
Section 301 duties imposed on China imports forced U.S. importers to consider alternative sourcing. New litigation may transform CBP's approach to country of origin determinations.
Toll charges on Irish roads will increase by up to 60% in the new year. Geraldine Herbert & Peadar Toibin spoke to Ian Guider on The Last Word about what this could mean for motorists. Catch the full chat by pressing the 'Play' button on this page.
If you're planning for early retirement and have saved money in tax qualified accounts, there are some important considerations to be aware of. In this week's episode of Grow Money Business, we are going to dive into how early retirees can avoid the 10% withdrawal penalty. Throughout the episode, we discuss the details of the early withdrawal penalty, some common misunderstandings about Roth IRAs, and the three options you can use to avoid the 10% withdrawal penalty when you decide to retire before 59½. [01.02] Early withdrawal penalty – Grant explains the ins and outs of the early withdrawal penalty, which applies to distributions taken from an IRA or retirement plan before the participant is 59½ years old. [05.15] 401k Distributions – Grant shares some important considerations if you plan to take distributions from your 401K before IRAs or Roth IRAs. [10.45] Substantially equal periodic payments – Grant explains how you can avoid the early withdrawal penalty by utilizing substantially equal periodic payments. [16.15] Taxable Brokerage Accounts – Grant shares a third maneuver for avoiding the early withdrawal penalty that allows tax-deferred accounts to grow and compound. [20.16] Roth IRA Myths – Grant clarifies some common misconceptions regarding the five-year ROTH IRA rule. Resources 72t Distributions: The Ultimate Guide to Early Retirement – https://www.abovethecanopy.us/the-ultimate-guide-to-early-retirement-with-72t-distributions/ Substantially Equal Periodic Payments – https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/substantially-equal-periodic-payments Exceptions to Tax on Early Distributions – https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/plan-participant-employee/retirement-topics-tax-on-early-distributions
In today's episode Anthony dives deep into how to put together a thoughtful and productive Employees First (decision making) framework; and the importance of having one in the first place!
On Friday's show: Pockets of the Houston region, particularly in the city's northern suburbs, are sinking at a substantial rate according to a University of Houston analysis on subsidence conducted over a four-year period. MORE: Surface Deformation Study Also this hour: From the Texans allowing fans to trade in their Deshaun Watson jerseys (and those of other former players) for discounts on new team merchandise, to Astros manager Dusty Baker making a huge deli purchase for his players right before his team mounted a huge comeback victory, we discuss The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of the week. And acclaimed travel host Rick Steves tells us about his new six-part series, Rick Steves Art of Europe, debuting Oct. 24 at 9 p.m. on Houston Public Media, TV 8.
⚾️ Interpreting Ricketts and Hoyer year-end messages to fans⚾️ Management under pressure to 'substantially supplement' roster⚾️ Arizona Fall League update⚾️ Division series predictions
Cubs owner Tom Ricketts released a letter to fans on Tuesday. Sam and Matt break it all down, including Ricketts' note on the plan to "substantially supplement" the roster for 2023. Plus: Home attendance down to their lowest levels in a while, the possibility of pitcher Drew Smyly returning, and more. Hit the feedback zone by sending us a text: 312-834-4634 Follow us on Twitter: @LockedOnCubs | @matt_cozzi | @SamOlbur Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors! Built Bar Built Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to builtbar.com and use promo code “LOCKEDON15,” and you'll get 15% off your next order. BetOnline BetOnline.net has you covered this season with more props, odds and lines than ever before. BetOnline – Where The Game Starts! SimpliSafe With Fast Protect™️ Technology, exclusively from SimpliSafe, 24/7 monitoring agents capture evidence to accurately verify a threat for faster police response. There's No Safe Like SimpliSafe. Visit SimpliSafe.com/LockedOnMLB to learn more. Rhone The Commuter Shirt can get you through any work day and straight into whatever comes next. Head to rhone.com/LOCKEDON and use promo code LOCKEDON to save 20% off your entire order. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Cubs owner Tom Ricketts released a letter to fans on Tuesday. Sam and Matt break it all down, including Ricketts' note on the plan to "substantially supplement" the roster for 2023. Plus: Home attendance down to their lowest levels in a while, the possibility of pitcher Drew Smyly returning, and more.Hit the feedback zone by sending us a text: 312-834-4634Follow us on Twitter: @LockedOnCubs | @matt_cozzi | @SamOlburSupport Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Built BarBuilt Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to builtbar.com and use promo code “LOCKEDON15,” and you'll get 15% off your next order.BetOnlineBetOnline.net has you covered this season with more props, odds and lines than ever before. BetOnline – Where The Game Starts!SimpliSafeWith Fast Protect™️ Technology, exclusively from SimpliSafe, 24/7 monitoring agents capture evidence to accurately verify a threat for faster police response. There's No Safe Like SimpliSafe. Visit SimpliSafe.com/LockedOnMLB to learn more.RhoneThe Commuter Shirt can get you through any work day and straight into whatever comes next. Head to rhone.com/LOCKEDON and use promo code LOCKEDON to save 20% off your entire order. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Today's show looks into the recent developments coming out of WWE's Q2 earnings call with WWE stating the investigation into Vince and another "ex-executive" AKA John Laurinaitis is "substantially complete". We'll take a look at their earnings for this quarter compared to last and touch on an interesting note from Nick Khan.18:15 Begins the WWE Monday Night Raw Review!Follow the show!Twitter:@KickAshPodcast_@ashmannsTikTok:@KickAshPodcast
Taoiseach Michéal Martin, speaking in Japan on the need for balancing food security with climate issue, while Prof Barry McMullen, from DCU on the need to reduce animal methane globally
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Yes, AI research will be substantially curtailed if a lab causes a major disaster, published by lc on June 14, 2022 on LessWrong. There's a narrative that Chapman and other smart people seem to endorse that goes: People say a public AI disaster would rally public opinion against AI research and create calls for more serious AI safety. But the COVID pandemic killed several million people and wasted upwards of a year of global GDP. Pandemics are, as a consequence, now officially recognized as a non-threat that should be rigorously ignored. So we should expect the same outcome from AI disasters. I'm pretty sure I have basically the same opinion and mental models of U.S. government, media, and poltics as Eliezer & David, but even then, this argument seems like it's trying too hard to be edgy. Here's another obvious historical example that I find much more relevant. U.S. anti-nuclear activists said for years that nuclear power wasn't safe, and nuclear scientists replied over and over that the activists were just non-experts misinformed by TV, and that a meltdown was impossible. Then the Three Mile Island meltdown happened. The consequence of that accident, which didn't even conclusively kill any particular person, was that anti-nuclear activists got nuclear power regulated in the U.S. to the point where making new plants is completely cost inefficient, as a rule, even in the event of technology advancements. The difference, of course, between pandemics and nuclear safety breaches, is that pandemics are a natural phenomenon. When people die from diseases, there are only boring institutional failures. In the event of a nuclear explosion, the public, the government, and the media get scapegoats and an industry to blame for the accident. To imply that established punching bags like Google and Facebook would just walk away from causing an international crisis on the scale of the Covid epidemic, strikes me as confusingly naive cynicism from some otherwise very lucid people. If the media had been able to squarely and emotively pin millions of deaths on some Big Tech AI lab, we would have faced a near shutdown of AI research and maybe much of venture capital. Regardless of how performative our government's efforts in responding to the problem were, they would at least succeed at introducing extraordinarily imposing costs and regulations on any new organization that looked to a bureaucractic body like it wanted to make anything similar. The reason such measures were not enforced on U.S. gain-of-function labs following Covid, is because Covid did not come from U.S. gain-of-function labs, and the public is not smart/aware enough to know that they should update towards those being bad. To be sure, politicians would do a lot of other counterproductive things too. We might still fail. But the long term response to an unprecedented AI catastrophe would be a lot more like the national security establishment response to 9/11 than it would our bungling response to the Coronavirus. There'd be a TSA and a war in the wrong country, but there'd also be a DHS, and a vastly expanded NSA/CIA budget and "prerogative". None of this is to say that such an accident is likely to happen. I highly doubt any misaligned AI influential enough to cause a disaster on this scale would not also be in a position to just end us. But I do at least empathize with the people who hope that whatever DeepMind's cooking, it'll end up in some bungled state where it only kills 10 million people instead of all of us and we can maybe get a second chance. Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org.
One of the greatest riddles of the decarbonization effort is the residential sector, responsible for about 20 percent of US energy-related carbon emissions. There are about 142 million housing units in the US, around 83 million of which are “owner-occupied.” Substantially changing them involves dealing with 83 million separate owners, each with their own circumstances and preferences.Residential decarbonization seems incredibly difficult to scale up, and attempts to date have not been particularly successful. At the rate we are going, it will take hundreds of years to decarbonize America’s housing stock. The crew at New York-based climate tech company Sealed is trying something new, imported from the commercial efficiency market. Rather than trying to persuade homeowners to buy and install things with their own scarce resources, Sealed covers all the upfront costs and coordinates the work with trusted contractors. Homeowners pay the retrofit back out of energy savings, which means Sealed only gets paid if there are, in fact, measurable energy savings. This kind of pay-for-performance arrangement is called an energy services agreement (ESA). Listeners of my pod with Rob Harmon will recognize the concept: customers are paying for metered energy efficiency, in the same way they would pay for energy. Sealed started small but is growing quickly, so I’m excited to talk to its president and co-founder Andy Frank about the frustrations and failures of residential energy efficiency to date, what he’s learned about homeowner preferences, and what kind of benefits come along with having a fully electrified home. Get full access to Volts at www.volts.wtf/subscribe
A discussion with lots of terrific financial information and indicators.
In a normal real estate market, you can generally predict whether sales will go up or down based on the number of homes under contract. December 2021 and January 2022, fewer homes went under contract than did in December 2020 and January 2021. So logically, we had fewer closings in January/February 2022 vs. January/February 2021, right? Wrong. Substantially more homes sold in January/February 2022 despite there being fewer new contracts, and that trend is fairly consistent for the past nine months. What is causing this pattern, and what does it mean for those buying or selling real estate in 2022? That's what this episode of the Selling Greenville podcast attempts to tackle. As always, if you have any questions or comments (or, of course, need a realtor), feel free to reach out to Stan McCune directly by phone/text at (864) 735-7580 or by email at smccune@cdanjoyner.com.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
