Podcasts about scientific journals

Our field of information systems is in the fortunate position that we have our own independent and self-governed association (we have more than one, in fact), which publishes one of the true top journals of our field, which means that the journal is entirely in our control as members. But as , the current Editor-in-Chief of the argues, this privileged position also demands from us collective awareness, vigilance, and responsibility. We discuss some of the tensions that exist between journals and publishers and what it means for authors, reviewers, and editors to be mindful about journals and publishing platforms. We also talk about several of the key hallmark features of the Journal of the Association for Information Systems and how to make the best use of them when you submit your best work to the journal. Episode reading list Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Fuller, M. A., & Schneider, C. (2006). Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 1-12. Adjerid, I., Angst, C. M., Devaraj, S., & Berente, N. (2023). Does Analytics Help Resolve Equivocality in the Healthcare Context? Contrasting Effects of Analyzability and Differentiation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(3), 882-911. Tarafdar, M., Shan, G., Thatcher, J. B., & Gupta, A. (2022). Intellectual Diversity in IS Research: Discipline-Based Conceptualization and an Illustration from Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 33(4), 1490-1510. JAIS Workshop: Creating Policy Impact through Information Systems Research. LinkedIn Post by Monideepa Tarafdar, . King, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (2019). Policy: An Information Systems Frontier. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(6), 842-847. McCarthy, C. (1985). Blood Meridian. Random House. Majchrzak, A., and Markus, M. L. (2013). Methods for Policy Research: Taking Socially Responsible Action (2nd edition). Sage. Yoo, Y. (2024) Evolving Epistemic Infrastructure: The Role of Scientific Journals in the Age of Generative AI. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 137-144.

Editors at scientific journals are quitting in droves. According to Retraction Watch, a watchdog publication, there have been at least 20 mass resignations since 2023.So, what's going on? If you look closely, you'll notice a common pattern—publishers are cutting back on the number of editors, increasing the number of papers, and charging hefty fees for authors to publish their work.The most recent mass resignation happened at the Journal of Human Evolution at the end of 2024. Both co-editors in chief and the entire editorial board quit, except for one person.What does this mean for the future of scientific publishing? Have these resignations made the big publishers change their ways? Is the strict academic publishing system we know in danger?To answer those questions and more, Ira talks with Dr. Andrea Taylor, former co-editor in chief of the Journal of Human Evolution; and Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch and editor in chief of The Transmitter.Transcripts for each segment will be available after the show airs on sciencefriday.com. Subscribe to this podcast. Plus, to stay updated on all things science, sign up for Science Friday's newsletters.

Welcome to a conversation we recorded at The 7th Collaborative Clinical Trials in Anaesthesiology Conference, Prato, Italy. What is the role of a journal in 2024? Why are platform trials so exciting at the moment? How have things moved forward in research? Presented by Desiree Chappell with her co-hosts Mike Grocott, Kate Leslie and their guest Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo the 17th Editor in Chief of the Journal of the American Medical Association and the JAMA Network.

The Mediterranean Diet has been widely studied and praised for its numerous health benefits, particularly for promoting heart health, brain health, and overall longevity. In this episode, Dr. Armstrong and Corbin Bruton discuss what the Mediterranean Diet entails and its benefits for… aging well.For listeners interested in learning more about the Mediterranean Diet, there are numerous resources and sources of information available. Here are some suggestions*:Books:"The Complete Mediterranean Cookbook" by America's Test Kitchen"The Mediterranean Diet for Beginners: The Complete Guide - 40 Delicious Recipes, 7-Day Diet Meal Plan, and 10 Tips for Success" by Rockridge Press"The Blue Zones Kitchen: 100 Recipes to Live to 100" by Dan BuettnerWebsites and Online Resources: Oldways Mediterranean Diet: The Oldways website offers a wealth of information on the Mediterranean Diet, including guides, recipes, meal plans, and educational resources.Mayo Clinic: The Mayo Clinic website provides information on the Mediterranean Diet, including its health benefits, food lists, meal planning tips, and recipes.American Heart Association: The American Heart Association offers resources on heart-healthy eating, including information on the Mediterranean Diet and its role in heart health.Cooking Classes and Workshops: Local community centers, culinary schools, and adult education programs often offer cooking classes and workshops focused on Mediterranean cuisine. Check with your local institutions for upcoming classes and events.Nutrition and Health Professionals:Registered dietitians and nutritionists can provide personalized guidance and support for individuals interested in adopting the Mediterranean Diet. They can offer tailored recommendations, meal plans, and strategies to help meet health goals.Documentaries and Films:"The Magic Pill": While not specifically about the Mediterranean Diet, this documentary explores the impact of diet on health and includes segments on the benefits of a Mediterranean-style eating pattern."Mediterranean Diet: The Easy Guide for Beginners": This documentary provides an overview of the Mediterranean Diet, its health benefits, and practical tips for adopting the diet.Podcasts and Audio Resources:"Mediterranean Diet Podcast": This podcast explores various aspects of the Mediterranean Diet, including its health benefits, cooking tips, and success stories."Nutrition Diva's Quick and Dirty Tips for Eating Well and Feeling Fabulous": Hosted by registered dietitian Monica Reinagel, this podcast covers a wide range of nutrition topics, including the Mediterranean Diet.Scientific Journals and Research Articles:PubMed and Google Scholar are databases where you can find scientific studies and research articles on the Mediterranean Diet and its health effects. Look for studies published in reputable journals such as The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, and The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.*Courtesy of ChatGPT.Support the Show.Have questions you want answered and topics you want discussed on the Aging Well Podcast? Send us an email at agingwell.podcast@gmail.com or record your question for us to use in an upcoming episode:https://www.speakpipe.com/AgingWellPodcast

In this episode, Tudor welcomes climate scientist Patrick Brown to discuss the biases in scientific publishing and media coverage of climate change. Brown reveals that high-profile scientific journals tend to favor studies supporting the mainstream narrative of the Paris Agreement and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. They also discuss the need for practical solutions to current issues, such as wildfires, alongside long-term climate stabilization efforts. Brown criticizes the narrow focus on negative climate impacts in literature and media, advocating for a broader perspective that includes the benefits of fossil fuel use and potential alternative solutions. Despite facing backlash, Brown emphasizes the importance of presenting different strategies and considering all alternatives for a cleaner energy transition. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network - new episodes debut every Monday, Wednesday, & Friday. For more information visit TudorDixonPodcast.comFollow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, Tudor welcomes climate scientist Patrick Brown to discuss the biases in scientific publishing and media coverage of climate change. Brown reveals that high-profile scientific journals tend to favor studies supporting the mainstream narrative of the Paris Agreement and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. They also discuss the need for practical solutions to current issues, such as wildfires, alongside long-term climate stabilization efforts. Brown criticizes the narrow focus on negative climate impacts in literature and media, advocating for a broader perspective that includes the benefits of fossil fuel use and potential alternative solutions. Despite facing backlash, Brown emphasizes the importance of presenting different strategies and considering all alternatives for a cleaner energy transition. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network - new episodes debut every Monday, Wednesday, & Friday. For more information visit TudorDixonPodcast.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, Tudor welcomes climate scientist Patrick Brown to discuss the biases in scientific publishing and media coverage of climate change. Brown reveals that high-profile scientific journals tend to favor studies supporting the mainstream narrative of the Paris Agreement and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. They also discuss the need for practical solutions to current issues, such as wildfires, alongside long-term climate stabilization efforts. Brown criticizes the narrow focus on negative climate impacts in literature and media, advocating for a broader perspective that includes the benefits of fossil fuel use and potential alternative solutions. Despite facing backlash, Brown emphasizes the importance of presenting different strategies and considering all alternatives for a cleaner energy transition. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network - new episodes debut every Monday, Wednesday, & Friday. For more information visit TudorDixonPodcast.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In today's episode, we are diving into a simple 5-step method to get 2024 off to an actionable and successful start. This episode provides a practical approach to planning, setting,  and accomplishing your professional goals. Learn strategies including using the SMART framework to define ambitious yet achievable objectives, mapping out action steps and milestones, gathering resources, scheduling time on your calendar, and refining your plan.  Walk away with tips to create clarity and momentum around professional growth and career aspirations. Jump in with Co-host, Tywauna Wilson, as she shares shares practical strategies to get you set up to win in 2024!5-Step Method:Step 1: Identify your priorities. Reflect on your skills, interests, and values. Review past feedback and evaluations to pinpoint 2-3 priority goals that align with your growth. This is the foundation for a successful plan. #GoalSettingStep 2: Set SMART goals. Make your goals specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound. Research your industry, brainstorm strategies, and define what success looks like for YOU. This clarity sets the stage for actionable steps. #SMARTGoalsStep 3: Map out your plan. Break down your goals into action steps and milestones. Consider tools, training, coaching, mentors, and networks you may need. Don't be afraid to ask for support to execute your plan. #ActionPlanStep 4: Schedule time and resources. Block out goal-related activities in your calendar, set deadlines for milestones, and track your progress with designated metrics. A clear schedule ensures you follow through on your plan. #TimeManagementStep 5: Review your plan and refine as necessary. Share your plan with someone for feedback, print it out as a visual tracker, and fine-tune your timeline and resources. With accountability and visibility, your goals become tangible. #PlanReviewEpisode ResourcesEPISODE 38: PREPARING FOR SUCCESS: A GUIDE TO MAXIMIZING YOUR NEXT CONFERENCE https://elaboratetopics.directimpactbroadcasting.com/s3/38Join Team #eLABorate and connect with us! Podcast Call to ActionWe would love to feature YOU!!!Share your favorite takeaway from today's episode: Video ReviewBe an eLABorate Supporter!1.     Listen on directimpactbroadcasting.com, Spotify, Apple Podcast, or your favorite podcast platform2.     Don't forget to subscribe to the show on your phone, tablet, or notebook so you never miss an episode!3.     Be sure to leave a comment, and share it with fellow medical laboratory professionals!4.     Join our eLABorate Topics Group on LinkedIn5.     Leave us a Video Review and we will feature you on our Social Media: Video ReviewBe a Guest on our show!If you have a leadership or laboratory message to share and would like to be a guest on the show, please contact us by completing the guest interest form or e-mailing us at elaboratetopics@directimpactbroadcasting.com. 

In the runup to the 2020 election, the academic journal Nature made the unprecedented decision to endorse Joe Biden for President. During an era when trust in science has never seemed more crucial, this decision led many to wonder if explicitly political statements increase or decrease public trust in science.Luckily, one PhD graduate from the Stanford School of Business designed a well-crafted experiment to find an answer. Using the Nature endorsement as a test case, Floyd Zhang wrote a paper that helps us explore the effects of public trust when scientific journals make endorsements.

4:00 – Jose Antonio first met Dr Kalman in NY City; to speak at Hunter CollegeHis bathroom was about as wide as a laptop computer.New York City was so loud; hard to fall asleep.8:05 – Dr. Kalman was one of the first dietitians to promote the idea that non-dietitians can and should give sports nutrition advice. He was quite hated by the dietetics community. He was the original RD renegade.14:25 – People don't like to be challenged says Kalman.  Of course he's not always a nice guy. 19:13 – Need more than book knowledge to be a sports nutritionist – Kalman 20:12 – Is sports nutrition about health? 25:20 – Sports nutrition requires that you need to learn the culture of the athlete. 29:19 – You need to “meet the person where they are.” The sports nutritionist needs to adjust their recommendations, not make the athlete adjust to you.33:40 – do you know anyone that consumes 10 grams of CHO per kg? So many athletes eat like shit – Kalman35:24 – The REGULATION of the supplement industry; it is a myth that the supplement industry isn't regulated.48:37 – Can we trust what's on the label of a dietary supplement?54:30 – Dr Kalman gives his top 5 sports supplementsDouglas S. Kalman PhD, RD, FACN FISSNDr. Kalman is currently Adjunct Faculty at the Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine at Nova Southeastern University. Historically, Dr. Kalman has been involved in over 250 clinical trials and projects within the pharmaceutical, medical and exercise - nutrition fields. He has published over 80 abstracts and more than 60 peer-reviewed manuscripts. He is also a Co-Editor of one journal (JISSN) and on the Editorial Board of three Scientific Journals. Dr. Kalman received his undergraduate degree from Florida State University, Master's Degree from Hunter College - City University of New York and Doctorate in exercise and nutritional biochemistry (Health Research) from Touro University International. He is an Active Member and or Spokesperson with many organizations (ISSN, NSCA, APS, ACSM, etc.) and a co-founder of The International Society of Sports Nutrition (www.theissn.org). He has worked with Olympic Athlete's (Nagano, Japan, Salt Lake City, UT, Torino, Italy, London, England, Rio de Janiero, Brazil and in the recent Tokyo, Japan 2020 Olympics) for Winter and Summer sports. In addition, Dr. Kalman works with and has worked with professional athletes (i.e., USTA, WTT, MLB, NFL, NBA, UFC/Bellator/ONE Championship), musicians and musical groups, collegiate athletes and teams as well as Nike's Elite Distance Racing Team (Oregon Project). Dr. Kalman has edited four academic textbooks, contributed to more than five academic textbooks as well as two “popular press” books. He has been interviewed on various media outlets such as NBC, MSNBC, CBS Evening News, CNN, Discovery Channel plus others along with a host of radio shows. Dr. Kalman is currently an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine at Nova Southeastern University (NSU), while also holding appointments in the College of Psychology and the College of Healthcare Sciences. He has been a Sports Nutritionist for DI - Florida International University (FIU 2010 – 2018). He has been the Nutrition Program Consultant for IMG Academies in Bradenton, Florida and the Team Nutritionist for Coral Springs Aquatic Center while being a nutrition consultant to the United States Tennis Association - Player Development Program (USTA). He has taught at New York University, C.W. Post-Long Island University and Florida Atlantic University. 

Open Access is one of the pillars of Open Science. In this episode I am talking to Jean-Claude Guedon from the University of Montreal (Canada). Jean-Claude is one of the authors of the declaration of the Budapest Open Access Initiative from 2002. He is also an expert on scientific communication and its history. Who better to take us through the road that led to the Open Access declaration, what has become of it and where (we hope) it will go. Here a few links you might look up:https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org The site of the Budapest Open Access Initiative - which includes the declarationhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude_Guédon Jean-Claude's bio on Wikipediahttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2018.00008/full a history on the Garfield scientific indexinghttps://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1580 Michael Eisen another co-author of the Budapest declaration. This article is from 2014 where he talks about why he forsake open accesshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevan_Hanard Stevan Hanard is another signatory of the Budapest declaration A History of Scientific Journals: publishing at the Royal Society 1665 - 2015, UCL Press A Fyfe, N Moxham, J McDougall-Waters, C Moerk Roestvik, 2022Support the Show.Thank you for listening and your ongoing support. It means the world to us! Support the show on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/codeforthought Get in touch: Email mailto:code4thought@proton.me UK RSE Slack (ukrse.slack.com): @code4thought or @piddie US RSE Slack (usrse.slack.com): @Peter Schmidt Mastadon: https://fosstodon.org/@code4thought or @code4thought@fosstodon.org LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/pweschmidt/ (personal Profile)LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/codeforthought/ (Code for Thought Profile) This podcast is licensed under the Creative Commons Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

In this special out of studio episode, Taylor sits down with Marlene Silva(publisher for Materials Today) and Susan Sinnott(department head and professor of Materials Science at Penn State) to discuss all the ins and outs of publishing. What are some good tips for first time publishers? What is an impact factor and is it even that useful? Take a listen and find out. This episode is sponsored by Materials Today, an Elsevier community dedicated to the creation and sharing of materials science knowledge and experience through their peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences, educational webinars, and more. Thanks to Kolobyte and Alphabot for letting us use their music in the show! If you have questions or feedback please send us emails at materialism.podcast@gmail.com or connect with us on social media: Instagram, Twitter. Materialism Team: Taylor Sparks (co-creator,co-host), Andrew Falkowski (co-creator) Jared Duffy (production, marketing, and editing), Ramsey Issa(editing assistance). Keywords: Publishing Journals Elsevier Impact Factor Materials Today Research Papers

can you be a good researcher without publishing in scientific journals? The question that comes up often and is debated within the public domain. The issue is is whether you will have the same legitimacy without that mechanism. It's not that the science will be any worse, in fact there's a lot of great science published on blogs and books, but it's whether the external world believes what you're doing is valid. You can create an amazing career as a scientific blogger as long as you put in the same rigor and effort as somebody that goes through scientific publications. It will just take you a lot longer to actually get there, And you'll have more doubters with what you're actually doing. However, it doesn't mean that it's not possible.

How is outcome bias especially relevant to science publishing? What are some possible solutions for overcoming outcome bias? In what ways are the publishing and peer review processes flawed? Why do many (or maybe most) scientists perform peer reviews for free? What value do publishers add to the scientific process, especially given that the internet democratizes distribution? How do (and should) scientific journals differ from newspapers? What kinds of changes must academic systems implement in order to improve in parallel with the proposed improvements for journals? How likely is it that a random preregistered study will replicate? Why can't we come to a consensus about some fraught topics like ego depletion?Chris Chambers is a professor of cognitive neuroscience at Cardiff University. His primary research focuses on the psychology and neurobiology of executive functions and higher cognition. He is also interested in the relationship between science and the media, ways the academic community can better contribute to evidence-based public policy, and methods for improving the reliability and transparency of science. You can reach Chris via email at chambersc1@cardiff.ac.uk, follow him on Twitter at @chrisdc77, or learn more at his website.

How is outcome bias especially relevant to science publishing? What are some possible solutions for overcoming outcome bias? In what ways are the publishing and peer review processes flawed? Why do many (or maybe most) scientists perform peer reviews for free? What value do publishers add to the scientific process, especially given that the internet democratizes distribution? How do (and should) scientific journals differ from newspapers? What kinds of changes must academic systems implement in order to improve in parallel with the proposed improvements for journals? How likely is it that a random preregistered study will replicate? Why can't we come to a consensus about some fraught topics like ego depletion?Chris Chambers is a professor of cognitive neuroscience at Cardiff University. His primary research focuses on the psychology and neurobiology of executive functions and higher cognition. He is also interested in the relationship between science and the media, ways the academic community can better contribute to evidence-based public policy, and methods for improving the reliability and transparency of science. You can reach Chris via email at chambersc1@cardiff.ac.uk, follow him on Twitter at @chrisdc77, or learn more at his website.

How is outcome bias especially relevant to science publishing? What are some possible solutions for overcoming outcome bias? In what ways are the publishing and peer review processes flawed? Why do many (or maybe most) scientists perform peer reviews for free? What value do publishers add to the scientific process, especially given that the internet democratizes distribution? How do (and should) scientific journals differ from newspapers? What kinds of changes must academic systems implement in order to improve in parallel with the proposed improvements for journals? How likely is it that a random preregistered study will replicate? Why can't we come to a consensus about some fraught topics like ego depletion?Chris Chambers is a professor of cognitive neuroscience at Cardiff University. His primary research focuses on the psychology and neurobiology of executive functions and higher cognition. He is also interested in the relationship between science and the media, ways the academic community can better contribute to evidence-based public policy, and methods for improving the reliability and transparency of science. You can reach Chris via email at chambersc1@cardiff.ac.uk, follow him on Twitter at @chrisdc77, or learn more at his website.[Read more]

Topics discussed on this episode include a scarring memory from Wes' childhood, relations between Afghanistan's Taliban led government and the Biden administration, people refusing to pay their mortgage in China, a Japanese man who has been driving without a license for fifty years, possible fraud discovered in Alzheimer's research, the return of Slamball, the suspension of Deshaun Watson, an SEC West football preview, a real-life Chucky in Alabama, a Russian psychic predicting the death of Vladimir Putin, Kat Von D distancing herself from the occult, and the mystery of the Georgia Guidestones.

How much do we interact with AI everyday? Scientific Journals say most of what is happening in AI won't actually be reality for years to come, while conspiracy theorists believe most of the internet now is purely run by AI put in place by the government and major corporations. We look to find the truth in the inbetween.  ★ Support this podcast ★

How much do we interact with AI everyday? Scientific Journals say most of what is happening in AI won't actually be reality for years to come, while conspiracy theorists believe most of the internet now is purely run by AI put in place by the government and major corporations. We look to find the truth in the inbetween.

Guest: Catherine Pereira-Kotze  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

* The Flesh: Just as gravity affects our physical universe, our flesh affects our spiritual lives. On this special edition of Real Science Radio, we present a previously aired episode of Theology Thursday. * Trading Genesis: Check out Bob Enyart's theistic evolution presentation in Malibu:             * From the RSR Email Inbox:Forwarded conversation Subject: Guys, this email thread btw some guy Ken and me re dino bones cracks me up... ------------------------ From: Bob Enyart  Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:56 PM To: Jane Albright, Kevin Lea In chronological order... On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:30 PM, k  wrote: Dan says you will pay me 10,000 to test some material for you.  Please let me know how to collect the 10k.  I could use the money, also please let me know how you would like to freight the material to me and where you would like me to freight it to for testing. ------------------------ On 9/30/2015 2:42 PM, Bob Enyart wrote: 10,000 what? Dan who?  Ken, maybe you've emailed the wrong person? - Bob EnyartKGOV.com  -  RealScienceRadio.com  -  rsr.org  -  DinosaurSoftTissue.com   ------------------------ On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:45 PM, k  wrote: Hi Bob,     Ah maybe, sorry if so.     A friend told me to get in contact with you about collecting ten thousand dollars to test some material.  I know now it was a joke...   LOL     Sorry again, ~ Ken ------------------------ On 9/30/2015 3:20 PM, Bob Enyart wrote: :)  - Bob EnyartKGOV.com  -  RealScienceRadio.com  -  rsr.org  -  DinosaurSoftTissue.com https://youtu.be/t8FfF2BgP9E [RSR Trading Genesis video]https://youtu.be/ML-p2CV8SHU [RSR Dino Soft Tissue video trailer] ------------------------ On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:13 PM, k  wrote: Very sorry, but my friend Dan is pretty worked up, I think the joke will not die...   So I will send you what he says and I promise not to take any more of your important time. " You should reply to him and tell him that you would like to date a dinosaur bone for C-14 and that you have heard he offers 10,000 dollars (link him to the video) for someone to do it. Then he will probably clarify.. " Again, please forgive me for this, ~ Ken   ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bob Enyart  Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:46 PM Subject: Re: 10 dogs To: k Yes, of course, a thousand pardons Ken for not understanding you right off.  Your friend Dan is right to be worked up. There's real money to be made here. This brief YouTube video documents our verbal offer to paleontologist Jack (smell-these-dino-bones) Horner, and then a scan of our written grant offer follows, as does an excerpt from our rsr.org/soft-tissue page... youtu.be/PXy7EH13lCo [Bob's call to Jack Horner]And Ken, then there's this, from atop our rsr.org/dino-soft-tissue page...    * Summer 2015 UPDATE: Two Dinosaur Soft Tissue Predictions Confirmed! Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams had predicted on air and in writing atrsr.org/predictions that: - Dinosaur soft tissue will be found not only in rare circumstances, but rather easily, i.e., when looked for. CONFIRMED in JUNE 2015! The journal Nature Communications reported original tissue in six of eight dinosaur bones investigated, leading to the conclusion that "preservation is more common than previously thought." And: - Original dinosaur and other soft tissue will be found largely independent of the claimed age of the fossil. CONFIRMED in April 2014! The Journal of Paleontology reported original soft tissue in Precambrian "beard worms" that are allegedly 530 million years old! Here, RSR presents the scientific journals reporting, the kinds of biological material found so far, and the dinosaurs yielding up these exciting discoveries: Scientific Journals: Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, Proceedings of the Royal Society, Bone, Acta Histochemica, the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, and others below in our chronological catalog, "the web's most complete list of dinosaur soft tissue discoveries," as published in many leading journals, according to a co-author of one of those papers. Biological Material Found: As of April 2015, in fossils from dinosaur-layer and deeper strata, researchers have discovered flexible and transparent blood vessels, red blood cells, many various proteins including the microtubule building block tubulin, collagen, the cytoskeleton component actin, and hemoglobin, bone maintenance osteocyte cells, pigment and evidence of melanosomes, DNA-related histone proteins, and powerful evidence for DNA including positive results from multiple double-helix tests.  Dinosaur and Dinosaur-Layer Creatures: The dinosaurs and other Mesozoic creatures that have yielded their biological material are hadrosaur, titanosaur, ornithomimosaur [ostrich-like dinosaurs], mosasaur, [bird-like] Anchiornis huxleyi, triceratops, Lufengosaurs, T. rex, and Archaeopteryx. As you view the exciting scientific discoveries below in this chronological catalog, please feel free to listen to Real Science Radio co-hosts Fred Williams and Bob Enyart observe their annual tradition of presenting dinosaur soft tissue and other amazing discoveries including short-lived left-handed amino acids, DNA, and Carbon 14, all in bones and other specimens from dinosaur-layer Mesozoic and even deeper strata.           And finally, as you probably know Ken (although Dan might be a bit slow on the uptake), and as first realized by Libby when he discovered carbon dating, if we can identify carbon 14 atoms that are actually a part of the collagen protein lattice, then they cannot be contamination, but have to be original 14c, which, when we document that in dinosaur protein, then everyone who is anti-science will tightly close their eyes, but everyone else will then have even more incontrovertible evidence that dinosaurs are young, all of them. And, when they lose the dinosaurs, they lose it all. Because dinosaurs have become missionary lizards. For dinosaur soft tissue means that the secular worldview is wrong, which leaves only one man standing, and that is Jesus Christ, who is God. Thanks for writing! - Bob Enyart co-hostRealScienceRadio.com    1-800-8Enyart    rsr.org ---------- From: k  Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:33 PM Subject: Re: 10 dogs To: Bob Enyart Hi Bob,     Thanks very much for the reply!   :-)     Talk to you soon, ~ Ken  

Hits: 53 Election Fraud Sign Petition: Defeat HR1. Defend Constitution & Election Integrity. Family Safety CDC Announces 79% of All US Omicron Cases Have Occurred in Vaccinated Individuals Whilst you've been distracted by the UK Govs. Christmas Party, PHS released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated account for 9 in […] The post Don't Want To Go Hungry? Listen Up!…Globalists Push Food As A Weapon…The Corruption Of Scientific Journals…See Saw Battles In the Courts Over Jab Mandates appeared first on On the Right Side Radio.

False And Scientifically Unsupported Beliefs About Obesity Are Pervasive Even In Scientific Journals -  Michael Greger, MDMichael McGreger, M.D., FACLM•           https://nutritionfacts.org/•           Book- How Not to Die Dr. Greger is a physician, New York Times bestselling author, and internationally recognized speaker on nutrition, food safety, and public health issues. A founding member and Fellow of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Dr. Greger is licensed as a general practitioner specializing in clinical nutrition. He is a graduate of the Cornell University School of Agriculture and Tufts University School of Medicine. In 2017, Dr. Greger was honored with the ACLM Lifestyle Medicine Trailblazer Award and became a diplomat of the American Board of Lifestyle Medicine. His books  became instant New York Times bestsellers, and his two latest books,  How To Survive A Pandemic , How Not To Diet Cookbook, were published in 2020. #MichaelGreger #TheRealTruthAboutHealth  #WholeFood #Vegan #Vegetarian #PlantBasedNutrition  CLICK HERE - To Checkout Our MEMBERSHIP CLUB: http://www.realtruthtalks.com Social Media ChannelsFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/TRTAHConferenceInstagram : https://www.instagram.com/therealtruthabouthealth/Twitter: https://twitter.com/RTAHealthLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-real-truth-about-health-conference/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheRealTruthAboutHealth    Check out our Podcasts  Visit us on Apple Podcast and Itunes search:  The Real Truth About Health Free 17 Day Live Online Conference Podcast Amazon: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/23a037be-99dd-4099-b9e0-1cad50774b5a/real-truth-about-health-live-online-conference-podcastSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0RZbS2BafJIEzHYyThm83JGoogle:https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5zaW1wbGVjYXN0LmNvbS8yM0ZqRWNTMg%3D%3DStitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/real-truth-about-health-live-online-conference-podcastAudacy: https://go.audacy.com/partner-podcast-listen-real-truth-about-health-live-online-conference-podcastiHeartRadio: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-real-truth-about-health-li-85932821/Deezer: https://www.deezer.com/us/show/2867272 Other Video ChannelsYoutube:  https://www.youtube.com/c/TheRealTruthAboutHealthVimeo:  https://vimeo.com/channels/1733189Rumble:   https://rumble.com/c/c-1111513Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/TRTAHConference/videos/?ref=page_internalDailyMotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/TheRealTruthAboutHealthBitChute:  https://www.bitchute.com/channel/JQryXTPDOMih/ 

Why should medical school students invest their time in basic science research? That’s our theme for this episode of Behind the Bench from AJP-Heart and Circ. Hosts Lisandra de Castro Brás (East Carolina University) and Jonathan Kirk (Loyola University Chicago) interview Dhandevi Persand and Nicole Maddie, both students at the New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine. Dhandevi and Nicole won the FASEB Dream Award to attend the APS Professional Skills Training Course on Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals, and they have co-authored a New Investigator Editorial detailing their experiences. More importantly, Dhandevi and Nicole are using their platform as Women in Stem to promote the importance of research for clinical trainees. As students in the NYIT Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (D.O.) program, Nicole and Dhandevi focus on how structure affects function. The translational research projects they have both worked on have cemented their feelings that research is critically important for medical students and clinicians. Did you know that D.O. students must complete 200 additional hours of coursework, compared to M.D. students, in order to learn osteopathic manipulative medicine? Listen for a refreshingly open conversation about time management and reaching for “stretch goals” which turn out to be surprisingly attainable.   Dhandevi Persand and Nicole Maddie New investigator editorial: the osteopathic medical student perspective on research Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, published December 2, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00813.2020

Scientific journals have been breaking with precedent this year and endorsing a candidate for US president, in light of the country's high death toll from the coronavirus pandemic. But what does this mean for the future of science?

Is it possible to learn a method that will help you get published in high-impact journals? And is there such a thing as a writer’s block? In this first episode of Season 3 of Science on surfaces we talk to Dr Anna Clemens, Scientific writing coach & editor, about the challenges of scientific writing. Dr. Clemens has a PhD in Chemistry and she is also a journalist. In her company “Scientists Who Write”, she helps scientists to improve their writing skills, to write more efficiently, and to get published in high-impact journals. In this episode, we really get to the bottom of the writing process and we get to reveal all the secrets of how to methodically, step-by-step, write a successful manuscript. Dr. Clemens starts by talking about the core of a good paper, which is also the key to success - the storytelling framework. She then guides us through the five step-process that will make sure all the bits and pieces are in place and that they all fit nicely together within the storytelling framework. Also, as we discussing the challenges of scientific writing, we of course had to bring up the phenomenon of the writer’s block – this unwelcome nuisance that most of us have experienced at one point or another in our lives, and which simply makes it impossible to get any words down on paper. Of course, Dr Clemens has reflected on this topic and shares her thoughts on how to address it.Thanks for listening! If you are interested in surface science and related topics, you should also check out our blog - the Surface Science blog Episode linksBooks discussed in the episode Deep work, Cal Newport: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25744928-deep-workOn Writing Well, William Zinsser: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/53343.On_Writing_WellWriting Science, Joshua Schimel: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13122323-writing-scienceGet in touch with Dr Clemens Website: https://www.annaclemens.com/Blog: https://www.annaclemens.com/blog-overview (or navigate to Blog button) Work with Anna: https://www.annaclemens.com/work-with-me (or navigate to "Get Writing Support" button) Twitter: @scientistswriteLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/annaclemens/

Andrew and Wen talk with comedian and biomedial engineer Pallavi Gunalan (followable on Twitter, Instagram and Tik Tok) about science, peer review, stem cells, Spartacus for some reason, how much sex Stephen Hawking had, and SO much more! But especially, where it all went wrong. In this case, a scandal so big that it rocked the scientific world when the author of a research paper falsified data, which led to 6 months of investigation, drama and even a tragic death.Pallavi also tells us about her numerous charitable projects, for which volunteers are always needed! The links to the projects discussed in the episode are included below!RespiraWorks - Developing low-cost ventilators Volunteer form to tutor Black students and Form for students to request tutoringMailing List to support Black Lives and Google Drive with resources

When you think of the annual motorcycle rally in Sturgis, SD, you don't usually make connections to the campus of UW Madison - but 2020 being what it is, there's an unfortunate resemblance this time. We'll go over that. Then, there have been dozens of scientific journals that have disappeared in the last few years, causing potential research gaps of alarming proportions. Finally, we have a selection of the recorded conversations Bob Woodward had with President Trump - recorded with Trump's permission! - for Woodward's book "Rage", and they are damning. If you wanted to hear it for yourself, this is your chance! All this and more on TMI for Friday September 11th, 2020! Listen in for your Cure for the Common Media!

Episode 2: Coach Greg Werner is the Senior Director of Strength and Director for Virginia Tech's Women's Basketball Team. Prior to that he was Director of Strength and Conditioning at Auburn and twenty years at my Alma mater James Madison University. He has publish over 30 articles in Scientific Journals and various strength and conditioning websites. In this talk Coach drops some knowledge on what its like training world class athletes, the evolution of the fitness industry over the last 30 years plus what it takes to be great as a coach.

Patrick and Greg draw on their experience in author, reviewer, and editorial roles to talk about the manuscript review process, and offer strategies for revising a manuscript and crafting a letter in response to editorial guidance and reviewer feedback. Along the way they also discuss spring break for octogenarians, spitting on graves, being flabby and unfocused, Milo and Otis, meat on a stick, subway jumpers, understanding square roots, voodoo dolls, ugly babies, Klingons, hostage negotiators, and rejected rejections.

This podcast had to take an unexpected turn from what we had hoped it would turn out to be. We are both facing about 12 weeks of isolation as our school has closed, meaning we have had to record remotely (apologies for the poor audio quality), but we are trying to keep our spirits up and approach this difficult topic with an open mind, as we discuss the origins of the virus, the government's response, and our overwhelming appreciation for those working to battle it.

Sean Henahan talks to JCRS Associate Editor Sathish Srinivasan and JCRS Editor Nick Mamalis about the importance of writing for scientific journals like the JCRS and the importance of following guidelines on how to get published in a journal.

Here are the links to todays topics: https://www.hindawi.com/ https://rarebits.io/about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9eJMzZEjlc&t=10s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uztjCqIgzsI https://squadapp.io/ https://www.villageglobal.vc/podcast/ --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/matt-gaboury/support

In this episode we talk about our recent Twitter chat topic on predatory scientific journals and how to learn to recognize them. We cover this article to start the discussion. Mentioned tools you can use to assess the legitimacy of scientific journals are: https://thinkchecksubmit.org/ Journal Evaluation Tool Visit www.scicommjc.org to learn more about the team, get in touch, subscribe to our newsletter and more! Follow us on Twitter at @scicomm_JC and Instagram via @scicommjc!

In February 1943, hundreds of German women joined in a spontaneous protest in central Berlin. They were objecting to the roundup of some of the city's last Jews -- their husbands. In this week's episode of the Futility Closet podcast we'll describe the Rosenstrasse protest, a remarkable example of civil disobedience. We'll also ponder whether a computer can make art and puzzle over some unusual phone calls. Intro: Between 1946 and 1953, British wordplay maven Leigh Mercer published 100 immortal palindromes in Notes & Queries. In 1933 English sculptor John Skeaping recorded his opinions of his contemporaries inside a horse of mahogany. Sources for our feature on the Rosenstrasse demonstration: Nathan Stoltzfus, Resistance of the Heart: Intermarriage and the Rosenstrasse Protest in Nazi Germany, 2001. Wolf Gruner and Ursula Marcum, "The Factory Action and the Events at the Rosenstrasse in Berlin: Facts and Fictions About 27 February 1943: Sixty Years Later," Central European History 36:2 (2003), 179-208. Nathan Stoltzfus, "Historical Evidence and Plausible History: Interpreting the Berlin Gestapo's Attempted 'Final Roundup' of Jews (Also Known as the 'Factory Action')," Central European History 38:3 (2005), 450-459. Wolf Gruner, "A 'Historikerstreit?' A Reply to Nathan Stoltzfus' Response," Central European History 38:3 (2005), 460-464. Michael Geyer, "Resistance of the Heart: Intermarriage and the Rosenstrasse Protest in Nazi Germany (review)," Journal of Church and State 40:1 (Winter 1998), 189-190. "The Rosenstrasse Incident Is Recounted," Canadian Jewish News, Feb. 27, 1997, 11. Jeff McMillan, "A Moment of Courage in Hitler's Berlin," Chronicle of Higher Education 43:8 (Oct. 18, 1996), A9. Evan B. Bukey, "Widerstand in der Rosenstrasse: Die Fabrik-Aktion und die Verfolgung der 'Mischehen' 1943 (review)," Holocaust and Genocide Studies 21:2 (Fall 2007). Ron Madson, "The Restoration of Conscientious Objection," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 51:4 (Winter 2018), 77-103, 251. Nathan Stoltzfus, "Dissent in Nazi Germany," Atlantic 270:3 (September 1992), 86-94. Nathan Stoltzfus and Mordechai Paldiel, "Rosenstrasse at 75," Jerusalem Post, Feb. 24, 2018. Julia M. Klein, "The Time Hitler Blinked," Forward, Aug. 5, 2016, 23-24. "Lecture: Nonviolent Resistance to Nazis," University Wire, Nov. 3, 2013. Dori Laub, "In Search of the Rescuer in the Holocaust," Historical Reflections 39:2 (Summer 2013), 40-56. Susan Neiman, "To Resist Hitler and Survive," New York Times, Feb. 3, 2008. Barbara Kellerman, "Those Who Stood Against Hitler," New York Times, Feb. 3, 2008. J. Kelly Nestruck, "The Good Germans," National Post, Sept. 24, 2004, PM9. Corinna da Fonseca-Wollheim, "'Give Us Our Husbands Back!'" Jerusalem Post, April 25, 2003, 10. "She Won't Use 'Holocaust' or 'Kristallnacht,'" Oakland Tribune, April 13, 2003, 1. Norm Guthartz, "Triumph Over Hatred," Jerusalem Post, Sept. 18, 1997, 9. Nathan Stoltzfus, "Unsung Heroes Defied the Nazis: Too Often Resistance Is Seen as a Choice of Martyrdom vs. Passivity," Philadelphia Inquirer, March 18, 1997, A.13. Anne Karpf, "A Remarkable Demonstration of Love," Times, Dec. 12, 1996, 36. David Molner, "History Lesson: In 1943 Berlin, a Group of Wives Won the Release of Their Jewish Husbands," Chicago Tribune, Nov. 28, 1993, 11. "27 February 1943: The Rosenstrasse Protest," Holocaust Memorial Day Trust (accessed March 31, 2019). "The Rosenstrasse Demonstration, 1943," United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (accessed March 31, 2019). Max Rennebohm, "German Wives Win the Release of Their Jewish Husbands (Rosenstrasse Protest), 1943," Global Nonviolent Action Database, May 18, 2011. Listener mail: Svea Eckert, "Inside the Fake Science Factory," DEF CON 26, Sept. 17, 2018. (The description of the WASET sting starts at about 10:50.) SCIgen - An Automatic CS Paper Generator. Adam Conner-Simons, "How Three MIT Students Fooled the World of Scientific Journals," MIT News, April 14, 2015. "Springer and Université Joseph Fourier Release SciDetect to Discover Fake Scientific Papers," Springer, March 23, 2015. Mike Rugnetta, "This Episode Was Written by an AI," PBS Idea Channel, June 29, 2016. Mike Rugnetta, "Can an Artificial Intelligence Create Art?", PBS Idea Channel, June 30, 2016. This week's lateral thinking puzzle was contributed by listener Jennifer Sinnott. You can listen using the player above, download this episode directly, or subscribe on Google Podcasts, on Apple Podcasts, or via the RSS feed at https://futilitycloset.libsyn.com/rss. Please consider becoming a patron of Futility Closet -- you can choose the amount you want to pledge, and we've set up some rewards to help thank you for your support. You can also make a one-time donation on the Support Us page of the Futility Closet website. Many thanks to Doug Ross for the music in this episode. If you have any questions or comments you can reach us at podcast@futilitycloset.com. Thanks for listening!

This week we are discussing an editorial from Physical Therapy Journal. We get into how much we really enjoy editorials, especially from specific editors, but we also discuss the role of scientific journals. Many clinicians confuse the broad and varied missions of a professional organization and the goals of that organization's scientific journal. What is the right platform for advocacy of a profession and what role does science play? Scientific Journals Are Not Advocacy Organizations. Jette AM. Phys Ther. 2018 Sep 1;98(9):731-732. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy073. Due to copyright laws, unless the article is open source we cannot legally post the PDF on the website for the world to download at will. That said, if you are having difficulty obtaining an article, contact us. Music for PT Inquest: "The Science of Selling Yourself Short" by Less Than Jake Used by Permission

Elena and Ian look at the languages science speaks… and the difficulties of writing them down. Guest starring: Galileo, Newton and the Fairy Pitta. This episode was recorded in celebration of peer review week: the planet's premier 7-day festival of intra-field regulation.

Our guest Dr.”Raji” Rajalakshmi Kandaswamy specializes in helping Non-Verbal children with Autism. Children with Autism from all over the world are being healed by her, WITHOUT meeting any of them in person. She has also been acknowledged on CNN Voice America report as an Autism Expert who gets results with autism thru her Pioneering Intent Healing(TM) modality. Dr. Raji is also the author of the book ‘How To Heal Autism And ADHD In 30 Days: The Phenomenally Powerful Breakthrough Of Intent Healing'(TM), She is also a consultant in the emerging science of Applied Energy Medicine and Applied Intentional Epigenetics. With ground-breaking publications in various Scientific Journals based on Evidence-Based Medicine, she is considered the go-to person in the field of Autism and ADHD. I actually wrote about one of the journal articles in my March 18th blog entitled Autism Scientists Reprogram Human DNA Using Words and Frequencies, https://wp.me/pxO6A-8b or go to beyondhypnosis.org to check it out. Topics Discussed: Autistic beings and their unique energy expressionsWhat is meant by ”Autism CURE " What makes DR. Raji an Authentic Autism Expert?How Autism is the Next Stage in Human Evolution What Parents Can do to heal their Autistic child right away  Contact Dr. Raji  Kandaswamy - www.authenticautismsolutions.com Contact Tamara Westwood - www.beyondhypnosis.org  

  Dr. Douglass Kalman, PhD, RD, FACN, FISSN discusses the efficacy of dietary supplements in the American diet. He has been involved in over 100 clinical trials and projects within the pharmaceutical, medical and nutrition fields. He has published over 50 abstracts and more than 25 peer-reviewed manuscripts. He is also a Co-Editor of one journal (JISSN) and on the Editorial Board of three Scientific Journals.   He is the co-founder of The International Society of Sports Nutrition (www.theissn.org). He has worked with Olympic Athlete’s (Nagano, Japan, Salt Lake City, UT, Torino, Italy and the 2012 London games) for Winter and Summer sports, professional athletes (i.e., MLB, NFL, NBA), musicians, combat sports (UFC-MMA), collegiate athletes and teams as well as Nike’s Elite Distance Racing Team (Oregon Project) and the general population. Dr. Kalman has edited four academic textbooks, contributed to more than five academic textbooks as well as two “popular press” books.   Dr. Kalman is the Sports Nutritionist for the FIU Athletic Department, a Division I competitor (www.fiusports.com). @dougkalmanphdrd theissn.org     

Film at 11: Mystery Science Theater 3000 LIVE Watch Out for Snakes Tour may be coming to a city near you.   BookIT: Author Tal M. Klein joins us to discuss his novel, The Punch Escrow, which is available TODAY.   Scroll with it: San Diego Comic Con has lots to show us, Scientific Journals have lots to tell us and the thirteenth Doctor is a woman!   Show Notes: http://bit.ly/tms72517

Top Gun 2 confirmed, Apollo 11 pouch  for sale, why flamingos stand on one leg, burrito shop closes due to "cultural appropriation", Divides Aside podcast, Team Viewer, and you can own a tank. Links from this episode: - ‘Top Gun 2’ Is Happening, Tom Cruise Confirms - Collection bag from Apollo 11 moon mission to be sold at auction - Scientists have worked out why flamingos stand on one leg - Oregon burrito shop run by white women shuts down amid accusations of cultural appropriation - Black Harvard Students Hold Their Own Commencement Ceremony - Fake academic paper published in liberal journal hilariously exposes the absurdity of gender studies - Divides Aside podcast by Emily Graslie and David Dault - Louder With Crowder - TeamViewer 12 - On The Kind of Weapons the Founders Envisioned - Tank (1984) *

Recorded 2 months ago, when Brett was congratulating himself on more timely podcast releases, enjoy this 2 month old time capsule into the far-flung past where the Carpool crew speculate about VR technology, Adult Swim cartoons and more.

Dr. Kalman has been involved in over 100 clinical trials and projects within the pharmaceutical, medical and nutrition fields. He has published over 50 abstracts and more than 25 peer-reviewed manuscripts. He is also a Co-Editor of one journal (JISSN) and on the Editorial Board of three Scientific Journals.   Dr. Kalman received his undergraduate degree from Florida State University, Masters Degree from Hunter College - City University of New York and Doctorate in exercise and nutritional biochemistry (Health Research) from Touro University International. He is an Active Member and or Spokesperson with many organizations (ISSN, NSCA, APS, ACSM, etc.) and a co-founder of The International Society of Sports Nutrition (www.theissn.org). He has worked with Olympic Athlete’s (Nagano, Japan, Salt Lake City, UT, Torino, Italy and the upcoming London 2012 games) for Winter and Summer sports, professional athletes (i.e., MLB, NFL, NBA), musicians and music groups, combat sports (UFC-MMA), collegiate athletes and teams as well as Nike’s Elite Distance Racing Team (Oregon Project) and the general population. Dr. Kalman has edited four academic textbooks, contributed to more than five academic textbooks as well as two “popular press” books.   Dr. Kalman is an Adjunct Professor teaching Graduate Sports Nutrition in the Robert Stempel School of Public Health at Florida International University (FIU), Miami, Florida. He also is an Adjunct at the Florida Atlantic University (FAU), Boca Raton, Florida also teaching Sports Nutrition in the Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion. In addition, Dr. Kalman is the Sports Nutritionist for the FIU Athletic Department, a Division I competitor (www.fiusports.com).   In this podcast, Douglas and I discussed this topics: 1.What is beta-alanine? 2. What happens in the body when you supplement with beta-alanine? 3.What dosage seems to be effective when supplementing with beta-alanine? 4.Does beta-alanine have an acute effect and does it have a synergistic effect when combined with other supplements? 5.What type of sports can benefit from beta-alanine supplementation? 6. A common effect from beta-alanine is a tingling sensation shortly after ingestion. Does this effect have any performance benefits or is it just a harmless side effect?

Matt Dillahunty and Tracie Harris. Scientific Journals and Reporting. Matt and Tracie have an informal talk about scientific journals and scientific reporting.

As part of the commemoration of the upcoming 20th anniversary of the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN), ASN Executive Director Tod Ibrahim interviews JASN Editor-in-Chief, Eric G. Neilson, MD, FASN.

As part of the commemoration of the upcoming 20th anniversary of the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN), ASN Executive Director Tod Ibrahim interviews JASN Editor-in-Chief, Eric G. Neilson, MD, FASN.

As part of the commemoration of the upcoming 20th anniversary of the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN), ASN Executive Director Tod Ibrahim interviews JASN Editor-in-Chief, Eric G. Neilson, MD, FASN.

As part of the commemoration of the upcoming 20th anniversary of the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN), ASN Executive Director Tod Ibrahim interviews JASN Editor-in-Chief, Eric G. Neilson, MD, FASN.

JPR senior editor recently spoke with Tim D. Veenstra of SAIC-Frederick, Inc. about the April special issue. A co-editor of the issue, Veenstra explains why he chose Tissue Proteomics and Metabolomics as the topic, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of working with tissues.

Audio Introduction to the Special Issue of Journal of Proteome Research podcast. you can listen to Katie Cottingham, senior associate editor of JPR, describe Special Issue of Statistical and Computational Proteomics.

Audio Introduction to the Special Issue of Journal of Proteome Research podcast. you can listen to Katie Cottingham, senior associate editor of JPR, describe Special Issue of Statistical and Computational Proteomics.

Audio Introduction to the Inaugural Journal of Proteome Research podcast. listen to Katie Cottingham, senior associate editor of JPR, describe a recent article about a computer simulation that helps researchers optimize proteomics experiments. The article appears in the October issue of Analytical Chemistry News and Features article (DataShop) "Holistic therapy for proteomics experiments", and a summary of the article was published in the September issue of JPR in the Toolbox section.

New research indicates that vitamin D can significantly reduce the risk of two common cancers. Exciting news for post-menopausal women who have had breast cancer - a new study from Greece says you may want to take a nap in order to improve heart health.  We'll explain. We'll also discuss interesterified fats, a new fat alternative.   Dr. Cooper answers calls.