Podcasts about criminal conduct

Lisa was the last person to see Buffalo Jim alive, but her police interview only raised more questions than answers. From inconsistencies about their relationship to her murky account of what happened in the Motel 6 that night, her testimony leaves a trail of red flags. Could Lisa hold the key to solving the mystery of Buffalo Jim's death? Or is she hiding something? In Episode 5 of Criminal Conduct, we dig into the missing witness's story, the role of deception, and the unanswered questions that still haunt this case.

When Buffalo Jim Barrier was found dead in a Motel 6, the scene raised more questions than answers. A mysterious phone call announced his death hours before it was confirmed, his Rolls Royce went missing and reappeared, and the woman last seen with him vanished. In this episode of Criminal Conduct, we piece together the events leading up to his untimely death and investigate the secrets that Las Vegas doesn't want to talk about.

Matter of Baeza-Galindo, 29 I&N Dec. 1 (BIA 2025)single scheme of criminal conduct; two or more CIMTs; temporal limitation; INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(ii); criminal intent   Turner v. U.S. Att'y Gen., No. 22-11207 (11th Cir. Jan. 30, 2025)former INA 321(a)(3); derivative naturalization; present-perfect tense; legal separation; Loper Bright; Skidmore deferenceSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Click me!Immigration Lawyer's Toolboxhttps://immigrationlawyerstoolbox.com/immigration-reviewWant to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerAll praise to the pod's wonderful editors!Luana Lima SerraDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

Hello PRETENDERS! I'm excited to announce that the new season of my other podcast, Criminal Conduct Season, is here! To listen to the rest of the story, search for Criminal Conduct and subscribe. ____________________ Buffalo Jim Barrier was a wrestling promoter, mechanic, and Las Vegas icon. He faced off against Rick Rizzolo, a powerful strip club owner with alleged mob ties. Their feud lasted decades. Days after Rizzolo's release from house release, Buffalo Jim was found dead under mysterious circumstances in a motel room. Evidence is missing, and there are anonymous threats. Questions remain unanswered. Criminal Conduct Season 5 unravels a story of corruption, crime, and one man's fight for justice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Buffalo Jim Barrier was a wrestling promoter, mechanic, and Las Vegas icon. He faced off against Rick Rizzolo, a powerful strip club owner with alleged mob ties. Their feud lasted decades. Days after Rizzolo's release from house release, Buffalo Jim was found dead under mysterious circumstances in a motel room. Evidence is missing, and there are anonymous threats. Questions remain unanswered. Criminal Conduct Season 5 unravels a story of corruption, crime, and one man's fight for justice. CRIMINAL CONDUCT Season 5 premieres Friday, January 17th

This is the 1010 WINS 4pm All Local.

As a holiday treat, Amanda of Wine & Crime, Javier of PRETEND, and Whitney of Navigating Advocacy sit down to chat true crime, being in the podcasting industry, cases that haunt us, dream collaborations, and more! Enjoy this bonus conversation and check out all of these amazing shows wherever you get your podcasts! Javier Leiva - PRETEND, Criminal Conduct, Ponzi Playbook Amanda Jacobson - Wine & Crime Whitney - Navigating Advocacy

As a holiday treat, Amanda of Wine & Crime, Javier of PRETEND, and Whitney of Navigating Advocacy sit down to chat true crime, being in the podcasting industry, cases that haunt us, dream collaborations, and more! Enjoy this bonus conversation and check out all of these amazing shows wherever you get your podcasts!  Javier Leiva - PRETEND, Criminal Conduct, Ponzi Playbook Amanda Jacobson - Wine & Crime  https://open.spotify.com/show/5OeKXVPomhbejM9v7CDqxJ?si=4451247ce3704a0a Whitney - Navigating Advocacy https://open.spotify.com/show/6I09OWnoDtibLjE7rfQqrH?si=9265b522586d4727 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On April 17, 2024, NYU School of Law hosted a panel of experts to discuss whether a former President enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct that allegedly involved official acts during his tenure in office. The Supreme Court is considering that question in United States v. Trump and will hear oral argument in the case on April 25. The panel consisted of George Conway, a Contributing Writer at The Atlantic and Board President of the Society for the Rule of Law; Trevor Morrison the Eric M. and Laurie B. Roth Professor of Law and Dean Emeritus of NYU School of Law; and Kate Shaw a Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. Andrew Weissmann, a Just Security Editor and Faculty Co-Director of the Reiss Center on Law and Security at NYU School of Law, moderated the discussion. Show Notes: George Conway (@gtconway3d)Trevor MorrisonKate Shaw (@kateashaw1)Andrew Weissmann (@AWeissmann_)Just Security's Trump Trials coverageMusic: “Broken” by David Bullard from Uppbeat: https://uppbeat.io/t/david-bullard/broken (License code: OSC7K3LCPSGXISVI)

In this gripping episode of "Criminal Conduct," we delve into the intriguing case of Ida Stutzman's death, as explored in bestselling author Gregg Olsen's latest book, “The Amish Wife.” Gregg shares his personal journey with this case, which has captivated him for decades and inspired his very first book. Reflecting on his early days as a young, believing writer, he reveals how his perspective on seeking truth has evolved over the years. The episode uncovers the mystery surrounding Ida's death, initially dismissed and swept under the rug, and Gregg's firm belief in her husband Eli Stutzman's guilt. It's a poignant discussion about how personal the journey became for him, transforming from a simple investigation into a mission to correct a longstanding wrong. Read "The Amish Wife": https://a.co/d/cq36xIV Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Australian basketballer Josh Giddey has been cleared of any criminal conduct by police in the US, after an investigation into claims he had a relationship with a minor, a Victorian police officer has been hit with sexual assault charges, US Vice President Kamala Harris has revealed how she really feels about the prospect of Donald Trump becoming president again and Novak Djokovic has responded to rumours he has a special relationship with a tree in Melbourne's Botanic Gardens.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Alex Murdaugh, once a respected lawyer, has been found guilty of murdering his wife and son. But the story doesn't end there. Murdaugh is also entangled in a web of fraud accusations, raising questions that go beyond a simple case of murder. This episode delves into the concept of 'Red Collar' crime, when white-collar offenders resort to violence to avoid detection. Murdaugh's situation presents a unique case study: Could his violent acts be a cover-up for his fraudulent activities? We examine how the dual aspects of his crimes intertwine, offering a rare glimpse into the world of red-collar criminality. Join us as we explore the depths of Alex Murdaugh's case, where financial deceit meets brutal violence." In this bonus episode of CRIMINAL CONDUCT podcast, we're joined by Frank Perri, an attorney, CPA, and certified fraud examiner. 00:00 Intro 01:57 John Taylor's take on Alex Murdaugh 02:08 Interview with Frank Perri Frank Perri's book "Red Collar White Collar Crime": https://www.amazon.com/Red-Collar-White-Crime-Corporate/dp/B09BGLZ7XL Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week, we are diving into the groundbreaking release of the 7th Edition of, "The Psychology of Criminal Conduct", by Bonta and Andrews. Join us as we explore the latest advancements in the world of psychology, discussing how this seminal text has evolved since its first publication in 1994. We will look at the enhanced theories and concepts that have shaped our understanding of criminal behavior over the decades. And that is not all! In a tribute to the enduring legacy of "The Psychology of Criminal Conduct,"   we have crafted a unique and catchy song parody titled, "The Criminogenic Beat" (or one of the other top titles based on your vote!).  This educational yet entertaining tune delves into the essence of what drives criminal behavior, setting the theories to a rhythm that will stick in your mind long after the episode ends!!!  The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 7th edition The Criminologist You Tube channel  

In this captivating bonus episode of Criminal Conduct, we sit down with CBS News Chief Washington Correspondent Major Garrett, a veteran journalist with an astute understanding of America's most complex criminal cases. Major Garrett delves into the double life of Robert Hanssen, a man who led a dark, deceitful existence at the heart of American intelligence. Hanssen, a former FBI agent, committed unthinkable acts of betrayal against his country, becoming known as the most damaging spy in FBI history. Garrett, with his incisive analysis and extensive knowledge, unravels the chilling truth behind Hanssen's motives and actions. He explains how Hanssen's espionage severely compromised national security and led to a complete overhaul of internal procedures within the FBI and the intelligence community. This episode is not just a recounting of historical facts but a deep dive into the psychological and emotional aspects of Hanssen's life. Garrett discusses the intricate web of deceit, the dual life Hanssen led, and the impact his actions had on his family and colleagues. Subscribe to Agent of Betrayal: https://wondery.com/shows/agent-of-betrayal-the-double-life-of-robert-hanssen/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Last week was Secrets in the Snow, this week is SECRETS IN THE MIST! Next up, Secrets in the Hail! This is one of Kimberly's classic most-watched episodes, but she wasn't expecting two huge twists! One is a crazy update at the end that she had never seen, and the second is that Katie recognized John Lewin! This episode also features Keith Morrison's very own cold case squad, including The Evidence Whisperer. It's also got the most detailed reimaginactment ever (congrats to the props department), lots of pea soup fog, and Kimberly learns about proper sneaking grammar from Keith. Also, does this episode have the first incident of a phrogger way back in the 1980's? Find out with this very special coverage from A DATE WITH DATELINE! Official Description from NBCU: When a mother disappears, the internet is still in its infancy; decades later, a cold case investigator wonders if Facebook could be used to help find out what happened to the woman who vanished so long ago. Keith Morrison reports. Find episode on Peacock, S21, E25. Check out our INCREDIBLE sponsors! Get some great deals and support the pod at the same time! Don't wait for the unexpected to happen— join the massive community of pet owners who trust Embrace Pet Insurance to protect their pet. Head to EmbracePetInsurance.com/DATEDATELINE and sign up for pet insurance today. Embrace your pets in sickness and in health! You wanna Bugatti? Get Ibotta baby! (We can't promise you'll earn enough cash back to buy a Bugatti but it's a fun song.) I'm loving getting deals and cash back with Ibotta! Let me know if you use it so we can exchange tips! Right now, Ibotta is offering our listeners $5 just for trying Ibotta by using the code DATEDATELINE when you register. Just go to the App Store or Google Play store and download the FREE Ibotta app! Looking for a true crime investigative podcast where each season focuses on a single case? Subscribe to Criminal Conduct season 4 wherever you listen to podcasts! Need the hosts' credentials? Um, a former secret service agent and private investigator, and an investigative reporter and host of PRETEND podcast. Is that good enough for you? Want gorgeous hair? We all do. Prose is the made to order haircare with your name all over it! Take your FREE hair consultation and get 15% off your subscription PLUS $20 off your first subscription order at prose.com/datedateline! Want to advertise/sponsor our show? We have partnered with AdvertiseCast to handle our advertising/sponsorship requests. They're great to work with and will help you advertise on our show. Please email sales@advertisecast.com or click the link below to get started. https://www.advertisecast.com/ADateWithDateline Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

We've had secrets in the suburbs, in Silver Lakes, and in the desert. But we've never had SECRETS IN THE SNOW. When a dancer (pronounced fancy like you're French) goes missing in the freezing cold, her husband smirks his way into the suspect #1 position. Was her marriage a pas de deux with danger? Not so quick (step)! What about the flamenco dancer that had recently waltzed into her heart? And what about the flamenco dancer's wife who is tired of having another woman jete through her marriage? And what about the mysterious local bank robber doing pirouettes around local law enforcement? Thankfully we have a graceful dancer (if leaning is considered a form of dancing), Keith Morrison, to take the lead in this story. And where he leads, we will follow! SECRETS IN THE SNOW Season 21, Episode 2 (on Peacock) Official Description from NBCU: A woman goes for a walk during a snowstorm and never returns. Keith Morrison reports.  Check out our incredible sponsors! Helps out the show by giving you incredible deals! If you like in-depth investigative podcasts, you'll love Criminal Conduct. John Taylor is a former secret service agent and private investigator, and Javier Leiva is an investigative reporter and also hosts the Pretend podcast (and dare we say a podcast friend of ours?). Subscribe and listen to all 9 episodes of Criminal Conduct season 4 wherever you listen to podcasts. And speaking of dancing, their theme song gets us moving!  Layer yourself in Bombas this fall AND help out people in need!!! We are still obsessed with our bombs socks, underwear, and shirts!!! Go to bombas.com/datedateline and use code datedateline for 20 percent off your first purchase! Hello Fresh is made to make parents' lives easier during back to school season!!! Let them take care of everything!!! Go to HelloFresh.com/50dateline and use code 50dateline for 50% off plus 2 MONTHS FREE! America's #1 Meal Kit for a reason!! It's time to start Thriving with the help of a company with a beautiful mission, inside and out! We recommend the mascara and eyeliner for your fall lewks! Right now, you can get an exclusive 20% off your first order when you visit thrivecausemetics.com/DATEDATELINE Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A mother's anguish resurfaces as her son's convicted killer is set free due to a jury verdict reversal by a judge. This is the story of Pravin Varughese. Binge all 9-episodes ad-free: Patreon: https://patreon.com/CriminalConductPodcast PRETEND+ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/channel/pretend/id6443456985 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

There are always two sides to every story. In part 4, listen to my interview with the online forum administrator. We discuss the ongoing legal battle with Patrick Tomlinson and why Patrick may go to jail over this feud. _____________ Binge all 9-episodes of CRIMINAL CONDUCT ad-free: Patreon: https://patreon.com/CriminalConductPodcast PRETEND+ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/channel/pretend/id6443456985 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Does Georgia's RICO statute fit the charges against Donald trump?  George and callers discuss the newest indictment.  Criminal Conduct or Political Witch Hunt?   Can you find a unbiased jury for Donald trump anywhere in the nation?  Does a Public-School case from 2009 in Georgia explain the RICO charges?  Will any of this change the mind of a single voter?  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Criminal Conduct Season 4 premieres on August 18th. John Taylor and Javier Leiva return to Carbondale, Illinois, nine years after a chilling incident that claimed the life of SIU student Pravin Varghese, as they unravel a startling turn of events that led to the overturning of a murder conviction. Binge all 9-episodes ad-free: Patreon: https://patreon.com/CriminalConductPodcast PRETEND+ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/channel/pretend/id6443456985 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Season 4 of Criminal Conduct is coming this summer. Stick around to the end of the episode to hear a clip. In the meantime, check out this brand new series from John Taylor's other podcast called TWISTED. The first of a seven-episode series on the disappearance and death of Rebekah Barsotti. She went missing outside of Missoula, Montana in July of 2021. Her body was found in May of 2022. Did she die from a river accident, or didn't something nefarious happen to her? Subscribe to TWISTED on Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-181-rebekah-barsotti/id1156118442?i=1000613070036 Listen to the entire season of TWISTED now: https://www.patreon.com/TwistedPodcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Tonight on The Last Word: The New York Times reports the Justice Department is invoking the crime-fraud exception to seek testimony from Trump's lawyers. Also, Special Counsel Jack Smith speeds up the investigation of the Trump documents case. And the Michigan State University shooting comes five years after the Parkland massacre. Professor Laurence Tribe, Andrew Weissmann, Matthew Connelly and David Hogg join Lawrence O'Donnell.

In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Eugene Volokh, a leading First Amendment Law Professor from UCLA.  Topics they discuss are related to the First Amendment.  The conversation includes how the internet impacts Free Speech, what responsibilities the Social Media Platforms have towards free speech, and how Free Speech impacts abortion, fraternities and sororities, as well as housing laws. Links: Eugene Volokh's Bio (UCLA Webpage) Free Speech Rules Videos:  https://FreeSpeechRules.org Show Notes: (02:40)  Has the internet changed the First Amendment on Free Speech (03:33)  How the Supreme Court views Online versus Offline Free Speech (04:41)  How Search Engines Can Reveal Your Court Case (06:08)  How Posting on Social Media Can Open You To a Lawsuit (06:44)  What Posts Can You Go to Jail For (08:05)  Do Social Platforms Have the Legal Right To Remove People From Their Platforms? (13:35)  Do Social Platforms Have the Legal Right to Curtail Hate Speech (15:40)  What is Doxing?  How Can Social Platforms Prevent This from Happening to You (16:58)  What Courts Say About Publishing Your Information (19:39)  Should Schools Police What Students Are Publishing (20:14)  What Rights to Public Universities Have For Policing Students Posts (21:39)  Private Universities: What Rights Do They Have For Policing Posts (23:07)  Can Admissions Departments Reject Students for Previous Posts (25:33)  How First Amendment Protections Extend to Clothing (26:20)  How a Toy Gun Can Land a Student In Hot Water (28:16)  Students Today and Views on the First Amendment (30:49)  Can People Protest For Protections Related to Criminal Conduct (32:24)  Can People Get Exemptions By Saying a Law is Against Their Religion? (33:10)  What is the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (35:07)  Can Businesses Prevent Men and Women From Working Together Based On Religious Beliefs? (36:58)  Can a Woman Get A Religious Exemption For Abortion Where It's Illegal (40:30)  How Courts Protect Your Right to Expressive Association (41:49)  Under What Circumstances Can You Exclude Someone From Living With You Based on Race, Sex, Sexual Orientation (44:03)  First Amendments Rights and Fraternities and Sororities. Transcript: Susan Stone: Kristina, can we geek out today and talk about the First Amendment?  Kristina Supler: I think we do that every day, but  Susan Stone: let's, okay. But let's talk on our podcast about the First Amendment, because our practice is often at the intersection of free speech when it impacts and conflicts with different types of student issues, like cancel culture or when students get disciplined, or Greek life issues like the Freedom of Association, uh, less often discussed First Amendment issue. Susan Stone: And it's difficult to balance the idea of the free exchange of ideas versus saying whatever you want, just because you wanna say it when you wanna say it and where you wanna say it. And it seems like everybody today is a lot less tolerant of views that aren't their own and cancel culture is becoming a very large part of our practice, which is why we launched our reputation management section. Kristina Supler: We are very pleased to be joined today by Professor Eugene Volokh who is a leading First Amendment scholar at U C L A, where he teaches free speech law, religious freedom law, church, and state relations law, among many other classes. Before coming to UCLA, he clerked for Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, and the US Supreme Court, and also for Judge Alex Kazinski on the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, who's also very well known,  Susan Stone: uh, and a court we've practiced  Kristina Supler: in. That's right. Yep. Um, Eugene is renowned for his textbook on the First Amendment, and he's actually one of the most cited law review article authors in our country. He's also the founder and co-author of the Highly Regarded Legal Blog, the Volokh Conspiracy, which is now hosted at reason.com. Kristina Supler: Thanks for joining us today. Oh, very much.  Eugene Volokh: My pleasure.  Susan Stone: And I should say I seasoned him. He was at a conference that we were at and you saw me inching up to Eugene, and I'm thinking I am going to make this person my friend, and talk about the First Amendment with him. So thank you for being on our podcast. Susan Stone: We're gonna start with a question broadly for our listeners. Eugene, how has the internet changed the way we view the First Amendment and freedom of speech in a very big way? And then we will drill down and funnel down that question  Eugene Volokh: well, depends on, uh, whom you mean by we. It hasn't so far, at least seemingly changed the way the justices view free speech or generally lower court judges, or in many ways, lawyers generally speaking the same kind of speech that is constitutionally protected offline is constitutionally protected online and vice versa. Eugene Volokh: Occasionally there have been times when. First Amendment law has turned a lot on the medium of expression, so for example, radio and television. Broadcast radio, television, not cable, let's say. Were, uh, were and probably still are seen as more regulatable for historical reasons. From the 19 teens to the 1950s, movies were seen as not really protected by the First Amendment, but the internet ever since near its birth as a popular medium. Eugene Volokh: Back in 1997, the Supreme Court said, speech on the internet is, Treated under the same rules as speech off line. So as a legal matter the internet hasn't changed First Amendment law much. Now I do think that people's reactions to various free speech questions may be affected by the internet. So, for example, I think a lot of people view things like Facebook and Twitter, those kinds of social media platforms, YouTube also and TikTok and various others as kind of part of their right to free speech and they get upset, understandably. Eugene Volokh: When those platforms restrict them, even though they're private platforms. So people would've probably said if the, if the New York Times refuses to publish my letter to the editor, well, of course, you know, they only publish as few too bad, but. But that's fine. Plus they get to decide where they want to publish and what they don't. Eugene Volokh: But I think the same people might very well bristle if Twitter or Facebook de deletes their posts for understandable reasons. Again. and, and there's an interesting question of whether that should affect the legal understanding, but but my guess is that at least it does affect people's understanding. Eugene Volokh: Another example has to do with access to court records. There's a longstanding tradition That material and court records is open to the public. Open to everybody. Yes. But it used to be before the internet. That meant that if you really wanted to get something on a court record, like maybe if you were a reporter and you were being to pay to write about lawsuits, you'd go to the courthouse, you'd go to the basement, you'd look at the, uh, at the files and you'd write about it. Eugene Volokh: But most, most court records would be basically invisible to. Now that they're all on the internet and often directly searchable, people get really upset that every case that they've been involved in, whether it was a witness as a plaintiffs, the defendant is a criminal defendant, as a victim, is now on the internet. Eugene Volokh: And people Google their names and they, they figure out uh, the stuff about them. So again, I do think the internet changes people's perceptions of information, of speech and the like, even if it hasn't changed the legal rules, at least. That's  Kristina Supler: actually a perfect segue to the next question I wanted to ask you, which is when you are speaking to, let's just say lay people, not, not judges or lawyers and, and speaking generally or more broadly about the First Amendment, what do you say? Kristina Supler: In terms of people who sort of have this idea that, well, on the internet, I'm, I'm an anonymous person, I can say whatever I want. It's the internet, it's the worldwide web. What do you say in terms of, well, maybe not quite there, there are some repercussions  Susan Stone: and that would be contained in the terms of service of the providers? Eugene Volokh: Oh, well, I think there are two questions lurking in here. One is somebody posts something. That, let's say, accuses someone else of some crime and then they get sued for libel too, not a newspaper. Why are you suing me for libel? Well, it turns out that. There are restrictions on speech. So for example, if you, especially if you say something knowingly false about someone else that damages the reputation, you could get sued and maybe, maybe before the internet, if you just said it orally, probably would be a lot harder to catch you and, but with the internet now, you could get caught. Eugene Volokh: Likewise, if you post something threatening. You could get prosecuted for a threat and people might say, well, what about free speech? Well, there are some narrow but significant exceptions to free speech, like for true threats of illegal conduct, like for defamation such as libel and the like. So people do have to remember that something that they just whip out in and angry or drunk or foolish moment. Eugene Volokh: To me, never, never you damaging. Today, , there's a separate question. Which is, well, what if it's something that violates, say, Twitter's terms of service or it doesn't even violate them. You know, private entities can generally remove your material or kick you off uh, for, uh, for whatever reasons they want right now. Eugene Volokh: At the same time though so how is that different from the things we started? Well, first of all, you're the, the, the downside to you, we have technology is pretty limited. Like people value their ability to tweet or value their ability to post on Facebook. But I think most people would rather, would rather get kicked off of Twitter than go to jail. Eugene Volokh: Uh, I would agree. ,  Susan Stone: my god, that is a bold statement, but, Would you take the position that you agree with decisions to pull someone off of Twitter like Kanye West or Donald Trump?  Eugene Volokh: Well, so it lot depends on what you mean by a Greek. So for example, I, I think that that large wealthy platform corporations like Twitter and Facebook should not be. Eugene Volokh: Essentially interfering with public debate about elections by taking government officials or candidates for office and kicking them off of their sites. Now, maybe they have the right to do that. They certainly have the legal right to do that. At least in most states. There's some state laws try to limit that. Eugene Volokh: It's an interesting question whether they're constitutional, but they might very well have the legal right to do that. One might still say that's not really good for. When a platform, just because it happens to have a lot of users and be economically extraordinarily wealthy and powerful, that it should be able to leverage that economic power into political power. Eugene Volokh: So that's a lot more of a concern with regard to candidates may still be applicable to Kayne West. Well, by the way, I think he is talking about running. For president, but uh, think it's particularly dangerous when they do that with regard to credible candidates for office. Because if an election, which could have been 51 49, 1 way is swung 51 49 another way because. Eugene Volokh: Uh, Jack Dorsey or Elon Musk or, uh, Zuckerberg decide that they, that they don't like a particular kind of speech, even for good reason, decide that that may be something we might be troubled by. We may say they should have the legal right to do this, but we might suggest that they ought not do it. Eugene Volokh: There's a separate question of may the government step in and say, You might think that you are like a newspaper, which gets to decide what's in it, put in its pages. You might think you're like a bookstore, which gets to decide what books to sell. But we think you're actually more like the phone company, which isn't entitled to say, we're gonna cut off someone's phone line because they're communists. Eugene Volokh: Or they're recruiting for the kkk, or they're recruiting for Antifa, or something like that. So, Is that permissible? Would it be permissible for the government to say, we're so worried about you being able to leverage your economic power and your ownership of this tremendously important means of communication into political power that we're gonna require you to be viewpoint neutral in your decision. Eugene Volokh: So not to kick off people because they're racist or anti-Semites, or because they're spreading particular views about covid or about elections or. That's an interesting and difficult question, and maybe the answer is that those platforms would have the right not to say, recommend certain posts not to pitch those posts to users as you might be interested in this or that because that's their speech, but might be required to host it, to host those posts on their. Eugene Volokh: So it could be that certain kinds of regulations as to the, what I call the hosting function of platforms are constitutionally permissible, whereas regulations of what I call the recommendation function of the platforms, which is a lot more, their speech would be impermissible.  Eugene Volokh: So I am really wrestling with that. Eugene Volokh: Is the, are these providers more like a telephone service company and we don't want the government listening in our co in on our conversation? Well, Eugene Volokh: I'm sorry if I can interrupt. I just wanna make clear the telephone point is not about privacy, it's not about confidentiality. Thank you. Even if somebody is widely known to be using a telephone line as a communist recruitment line, or a kkk, get out the vote line. Eugene Volokh: They're promoting it this way. Nobody's listening in on anything. It's well. still, then a phone company is not allowed to say, we're going to cancel your phone line because we think you're using it for evil purposes. No phone companies have to serve everybody so long as they, so long as they pay they can't engage in viewpoint based discrimination among their subscribers as opposed to, uh, among their users, let's say, the people who have phone lines as opposed to say a newspaper, which. Eugene Volokh: And probably should decide which op-eds to publish based in part on their viewpoint. Susan Stone: Thank you for that clarification. Would the barometer of censorship move up as the language moves from hate to calling for violence? Does that change your view? Is that like yelling? Fire in a theater. When you get on Twitter and say, this person is bad, cancel them, hurt them, or this candidate, let's storm the capitol. Susan Stone: I mean, when do you think there is the obligation? When does it really change from a moral obligation to a legal obligation to intervene?  Eugene Volokh: Okay, so again, we have. Several different things going on here. One is shouting fire in a crowded theater. I just wanna make it clear, the Supreme Court did say in a case, which actually since then has been overruled in considerable measure shank of the United States, uh, that the First Amendment doesn't protect falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater and thereby starting a panic. Eugene Volokh: So that was already a pretty narrow category of things that indeed are legally punish. So I wanna bracket this question of shouting fire in a crowded theater, falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater. It's, I, it's often used as an analogy, but it actually isn't much of an analogy because, precisely because to the extent the court has endorsed it, it's really very narrow. Eugene Volokh: It has to do with, with falsehoods that risk, knowing falsehoods, really that risk, imminent, imminent stampe, imminent loss of life. the second question is should platforms make, distinguish between. So-called hate speech, which could just be the spreading of opinions sharply critical of racial groups or religious groups. Eugene Volokh: By the way, that's very common for people to sharply criticize religions or of sexual orientations or gender identities or of sexist or whatever else, and calling for violence and yeah, I could imagine a platform saying, look, we are open to all sorts of viewpoints, but not the viewpoint that you should go out there and act violent. Eugene Volokh: So if you say, let's go out there and kill the Jews, or if you say, let's go out there and kill police officers. Or if you say, let's go out there and engage in violent revolution and kill the oppressive capitalists. Or let's go out there and kill the spoilers of the earth. Who are who are polluting our, our atmosphere with with greenhouse gases, whatever your ideology may be. Eugene Volokh: If you're calling for violence, we're gonna kick you off. I think, you know, you could imagine a platform plausibly saying, I think. , look, this is, this is something where we draw the line. We're gonna accept a wide range of views, including about race, about religion and such, but not if you call violence. So, so you could imagine that. Eugene Volokh: Now again, phone companies can't even do that, right? Uh, but you can imagine that possibly being a reasonable position for a company uh, to take. There's a third cat question though. Okay. Which maybe returns.  Eugene Volokh: Yeah, I wanna bring a scenario to you, and it might be that third category. Kristina and I had a case around a year ago where, uh, students were considered unpopular for various reasons on campus, and they were doxed, and these, our clients were terrified that their families were. Eugene Volokh: Going to be hurt. And I think that doxing has become a much bigger problem on college campuses. Eugene Volokh: So I'm gonna need you to define doxing. because people have used doxing to mean a lot of things. Okay. Tell me what you mean by doxing.  Kristina Supler: Publicly outing someone's home address telephone number so that other people can gang up on them and sort of got it. Kristina Supler: Espouse the mob and town. .  Eugene Volokh: So that's a very interesting question. So you're talk, uh, about whether it should be permissible for the government or maybe just for a public university with regard to its students, to forbid the publication of people's home addresses and phone numbers. The reason it sounds so appealing is you can have all sorts of public debates by and large, without knowing people's home addresses or phone numbers. Eugene Volokh: So one could imagine such a rule, and in fact there are a. Few statutes that do target that, or even more clearly like social security numbers. Very hard to see how my social security number is going to be relevant to some public debate. So you could argue that that's the kind of thing that should be restrict. Eugene Volokh: By the, the courts have not really been quite firm, even on social security numbers. They haven't had a lot of occasion to deal with it when there have been attempts to outlaw the publication of home addresses, usually focused on home addresses, say have police officers and others. Oh, legislators is another case that I was actually involved in as a lawyer. Eugene Volokh: Courts have said, no, it's unconstitutional to ban such publication, and there are various reasons. One of them, by the way, is that in most of the country, it is legal to picket it outside someone's home. I'm not wild about residential picketing, but it's a tactic that has been used and continues to be used by the left and by the right, by various groups on the left and on the right. Eugene Volokh: And if there is a legal right as there is in most places it could be restricted by ordinances or statutes, but most places don't ban residential picketing. If there's a legal right to picket someone's home, there has to be a legal right to inform. Home to this place that, cuz that's the home we're gonna be picketing. Eugene Volokh: So that's what makes that pretty complicated. But note Gary, you said, you said at home addresses and phone numbers, I often hear doxing used to refer to other things like, for example, a person's identity, the identity of a person who would rather remain anonymous. Like somebody who is a, an anonymous online commenter and somebody says, we think they're a troll. Eugene Volokh: We're gonna track them down and we're gonna tell you this is the person's name. Well, that could lead to possible threats against the person. It's also the sort of thing that newspapers pretty routinely do too, right? Like if you write a story about someone who'd rather not be written about, they could say, you're doxing me. Eugene Volokh: You're revealing my personal information. What's that information? My name? Well, it is personal information, but we. Have to have the right to talk about people's names and to find, figure out who's the person who's anonymously doing this or that. Likewise, sometimes people say, well, uh, this person docks me by revealing the name of my employer. Eugene Volokh: Well, that too might be relevant for a variety of reasons, both to figure out, let's say if the anonymous commenter is hired by somebody, maybe they gives them a conflict of interest if they'll say anonymous journalist or a popular tweeter or something like that. Also, sometimes people do organize. Or threatened boycots of employers because of the speech of their employees. Eugene Volokh: I don't approve of that as a general matter. But but in many places it's legal. And again, if that's legal, then you have to be able to identify whom you need to threaten to boycott. Hmm.  Kristina Supler: Eugene, I wanna switch gears a little bit. So Susan and I represent students across the country involved in a lot of different types of matters, general student misconduct, title ix, so on and so forth. Kristina Supler: I'm wondering what are your thoughts on whether schools should get involved in sort of policing what students post on the internet?  Eugene Volokh: Well, at least it de, it depends on what kind of. Uh, so  Kristina Supler: course private, private ,  Eugene Volokh: public versus private college versus high school. Yeah, high school versus elementary school. Eugene Volokh: That's actually gonna be our follow  Kristina Supler: up  Eugene Volokh: question, so let's take an example and also what kind of things are they, are they posting? So let's take an example. Let's say UCLA starts policing what people post by threatening to expel them for racist posts. That's a first amendment. If that's the policy, it's open and shut, unconstitutional. Eugene Volokh: And whoever is targeted by this should sue and they'll get, they'll get money, or at least their lawyers will get attorney fees. Uh, so, so that's, oh, that's good. always, that's always, you're  Susan Stone: speaking my language, .  Eugene Volokh: Exactly. . So, okay, so that's an example. But let's look even at the public university context. Eugene Volokh: Let's say the university says, you know, we've been hearing about various threats of violence. It could be racist violence, or it could just be, you know, there's chatter, like there's a strike going on and there's chatter about maybe vandalizing government buildings, uh, university building. And of hurting another  Susan Stone: student  Eugene Volokh: or of hurting another student, which is what we deal with Sore gonna do, is we're gonna monitor that, maybe hire someone to search for these things, maybe set up some ai, like talk to our computer science department. Eugene Volokh: Can you set up an AI that monitors tweaks to see if there are, if there seem to be references to things connected to our university, and then have somebody probably, it's not. And AI would have to be some human looking through and saying, oh, wait a minute. That either that, maybe that looks like a death threat and that's something we should prosecute someone for. Eugene Volokh: Or maybe even, it doesn't look like it's illegal itself, but it's useful information for us to know because maybe we wanna have more police presence at someplace or something like that. Or, or alternatively, let's say that it's not a threat of. What it is, is somebody posting, posting, uh, information about forthcoming exams that they managed to hack into somebody's computer. Eugene Volokh: Right. Oh, we know.  Susan Stone: Yes. We had those cases.  Eugene Volokh: Right, right. You know, you'd think that universities ought to be policing that public or private, doesn't really matter. Now, what if it's a private university? What if it's Harvard that decides we're gonna expel people who express anti-trans views? I think that would be very bad. Eugene Volokh: I don't think it's unconstitutional because Harvard's a private, if they do it university. Well, if they do it, I think that's a violation of academic freedom principles. It may be a violation of, of academic freedom policies that they've adopted as contracts in California, by the way, they weren't Harvard, but if we were Stanford, California has a statute that bars. Eugene Volokh: Private universities, generally speaking, there's an important exception we'll get to from expelling students based on, on their speech and otherwise disciplining students based  Susan Stone: on their speech. And I do wanna say, when I say they, I don't mean Harvard in particular listeners out there. I am saying though, that schools, that generally, schools generally, I wanna make that clarification in fact. Susan Stone: Eugene, we had cases where college admissions were revoked when school admissions committees were informed after an acceptance of students. We've had a couple of those cases that students, when they were 16, 15, made comments that were. Either consider racist or sexist. Mm-hmm. and against the values of the institution. Susan Stone: So there is a lot going on when schools find out about certain types of  Eugene Volokh: speech. Right, right. And I do think that that kind of policing is improper. And again, a private university may be free to do that, but I don't think it should, but, . Let's assume that this is particular kind of university, which is known as a theological seminary. Eugene Volokh: Mm-hmm. , where they say, you know, we believe in some particular religious viewpoint and we want to train future ministers of that viewpoint. And you've just been posting about how you're an atheist. Or posting things that, that, maybe not even an atheist, cuz then why would you want to come, come, uh, to study at our school? Eugene Volokh: You're a heretic, right? You claim you are a good ex Methodist, let's say, but really your views are ones we do not want around our institution. You know, I would cut, I, I would be more open to the, that kind of university doing it in part. My sense is a lot of these places, not all of them, I think some theological seminaries do, and some religious schools more broadly do make a big thing out of how they are open to all sorts of views. Eugene Volokh: But if some of them do in fact say, you know, we're, we're not there to educate everybody regardless of viewpoint. We are there. Promo promulgate our understanding of the gospel. Well then it's something more plausible for them to say, we're trying to build a community of people who think like us and not people who think differently from us. Eugene Volokh: So, so again, that's just the university level at the high school and the junior high school and elementary school level, it may be even even different. So that's, That's why it's, uh, it's hard to answer these questions in the abstract,  Susan Stone: so we'll drill down. We have every, typically it's either after spring break, we have a number of cases where younger kiddos, especially junior high students, middle school age, love posting pictures of themselves, either with toy guns or a bullet or the ubiquitous. Susan Stone: Hitler mustache, and we usually have to deal with those cases because they are, they usually get issued a suspension or expulsion notice.  Eugene Volokh: Right. Well, so I think a lot depends on the circumstances. A lot depends on whether there's evidence of substantial disruption. For example, something may depend on whether it's in a context where it looks like it's threatening or where it targets a particular person at the same time. Eugene Volokh: I've been involved in some cases where uh, there were attempts to punish students for just not even punish them, but just to stop them from wearing t-shirts that depict weapons to school. Well, and they, they were wearing some disciplined mm-hmm. . Mm-hmm. . And they, and they. Where, for example, some t-shirts that support gun rights, that have a picture of a gun or that have the logo of a pro-gun rights organization that has a gun on it. Eugene Volokh: They were told not to wear it and courts generally say no, they have a First Amendment right to wear it. There's no, there's no pictures of guns exception to the First Amendment, Kristina. So likewise with toy guns, if somebody, if a school were to say, you are not allowed to pose even outside school on the internet with a toy gun. Eugene Volokh: I think that's a First Amendment violation. Now, if what was happening is these, that the student had a picture of himself with a gun that doesn't look like a toy gun, turns out it's a toy gun, doesn't look like a toy gun, and he's saying, teacher Jones, you know I'm gonna shoot you with this. Well, even if it turns out that he couldn't do it, cuz it's a toy gun, that may very well be a punishable. Eugene Volokh: Yeah.  Susan Stone: Kristina, don't you think we've come so far from Tinker Vido, the case where students prevailed in protecting their right to protest Vietnam to what's going on today. Do you think there's a difference?  Kristina Supler: Oh gosh. I mean, it's just, I, I keep coming back to the internet and the impact of the internet and these online platforms for students too. Kristina Supler: Cause of course, that's primarily the lens that we're sort of examining these issues through is from a student perspective, the level, what is said, the, the. persistence with what is said, the frequency, how people sort of jump on the bandwagon. And you know, I, I, I don't especially love the phrase cancel culture, but it's just a reality now and students are caught up in things so often, for better or for worse. Kristina Supler: It can be scary at times. Yeah.  Susan Stone: When we talk to students, if someone says something that is, they love the word, the, the word of 22 is not triggering. They don't like being gas lit. I don't know if you're hearing you gaslight me. Um, do kids. Fight. I think of Tinker Vido. I think of I'm 56 and how precious the First Amendment is. Susan Stone: Do you think students even value the First Amendment anymore, or is everyone just like, I, I'm triggered. You're causing me anxiety, you're causing me depression. I don't wanna talk about it. Don't say anything.  Eugene Volokh: Everyone is, a lot of people, students are a large  Susan Stone: group . Are  Kristina Supler: you suggesting that we ought not generalize Eugene Volokh: Well, I'd be hesitant to say that I know how people think. Including people that I spend very little time around. I spent very little time around, say K through 12 students. Except, except my, my kids who were one of whom just went to college, but they were both K through 12 for, for many years. And I saw some of their classmates, cause that's, they skipped high school Eugene Volokh: But, but, but that's a very, uh, narrow subset of the whole population. And I don't even know all. On top of that, if you're comparing to how things were back in Tinker v Des Moines Independent School District back in 1969 that's, uh, you know, I certainly don't know what kids those days thought. Right. And I don't think there were good surveys that we could look back on. Eugene Volokh: And then on top of that, I think, um, a lot of students may say, you know, we value free speech, but with some, except, And the fact is, almost all of us, even those who value free speech a lot, recognize some exception. Again, for threats or for liable or, or, or for the like. So what I think has happening out there is there are, if you're talking about students, there are many tens of millions of students. Eugene Volokh: Who have different views about who should be free to speak under which circumstances. And then on top of that, there are probably quite a few who haven't really thought hard about the subject. So as a consequence, you ask them a question in a survey, they may give you an answer just to get you off off their backs. Eugene Volokh: But it could be a different answer tomorrow when something ill different is in the news because it's not something that they're really. To rest on as a as a kind of a, a, a, with a definitive answer. So I don't know what students these days think. I have a much better sense of what the legal rules are because they are set forth in part by our hierarchical authority, by the Supreme Court, and I can read their, their opinions. Eugene Volokh: I, I can read the minds of tens of millions of student. I'd like to, it  Kristina Supler: indulge me as we do a little law school exam question. Let's talk about criminalization of abortion. We've obviously had a recent significance, Supreme Court ruling and how that sort of meshes with or intersects with free speech considerations, particularly on public college campuses. Kristina Supler: I'm curious what your thoughts are if students live in a state where abortion is illegal, are they free to publicly protest and rally for something? otherwise a, a crime. What other speech pre are there still speech protections for protests related to criminal conduct?  Eugene Volokh: Well, what, what you're, what you're describing is a protest that maybe that they may include just decriminalizing conduct. Eugene Volokh: Just like people are free to rally for decriminalizing marijuana in a case that, that, and excuse me, in a state that still bans marijuana, they're free to rally for decriminalizing abortion. , right? Or not even decriminalizing, but fully legalizing and funding abortion. I'm perfectly free to do that more. Eugene Volokh: What about  Susan Stone: religious considerations? What if you are a student, you find that you're pregnant and you are part of a religion where your clergy says, You know what? I don't think you are in a position. I think your health is endangered. You should go get an abortion. Do you think that the state has the right to interfere with that free exercise of what someone had going on between that person and their clergy? Eugene Volokh: Well, so the answers may be, but the important thing is that, or one important thing is we've now moved a lot from a right to speak to a right to act, right? So remember I said you don't, you have a right to. , you have a right to argue that marijuana should be legalized. You have a right to argue that heroin should be legalized. Eugene Volokh: Perfectly good arguments that both should be legalized. That doesn't necessarily doesn't mean that you have the right to actually use marijuana. Or to use heroin. And incidentally, marijuana is an example of where at least some religious groups, uh, do view it as a sacrament. And courts have generally said no to those kinds of claims. Eugene Volokh: So, so the one thing we know for sure is people can't just get an exemption from a generally applicable religion neutral law simply by saying, I don't like it, or It's against my religion, or, My spiritual leader tells me that it's a bad law or tells me we should violate that law that can't by itself be enough because then otherwise all of us could violate any laws we want just by announcing this is part of our religion. Eugene Volokh: Or maybe maybe joining some religion that authorizes that. So it's a very different question. The pre speech question is very different from freedom of action. Now as to freedom of action, it is quite complic. It so there's for example, a case that was just decided by a trial court in Indiana. Eugene Volokh: Indiana has a law called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. It's modeled on a federal law that applies to federal statutes, but this one applies to state statutes in Indiana, these are called RRA for short. So the Indiana RRA says essentially that if the government substantially burdens somebody's religious belief through some regulation, then that person gets an exemption. Eugene Volokh: Unless the government can show that denying the exemption, that applying the law, notwithstanding the religious objection is narrowly tailored to compelling government interest. So let me give you an easy case under the law in favor of an exemption. Many courtrooms, as I understand it, probably most have a rule that says you can't wear hats in. Eugene Volokh: Agreed. Why? It's just sort of seen as disrespectful. It's not a, it's not a tremendously important rule, but it is the rule and you can't just say, I don't like this rule. I like my cap. Baseball cap. Nope, sorry. You wanna be in a courtroom. You gotta follow the rules. But let's say that hat is a Yamal cup or it's a Sikh turt, or it's a Muslim woman's or Orthodox Jewish woman's head scarf, let's say. Eugene Volokh: Or it's a Catholic nun. Headgear well, that there you might very well have an exemption. Why? Because the law prohibits you from doing something your religion tells you to do. That's the substantial burden part, and it's hard to see some compelling government interest in making sure that people not wear a headgear in, in court. Eugene Volokh: Maybe it's a. Legitimate interest, maybe even a substantial interest, but compelling. The law says it's gotta be very, very higher.  Susan Stone: So folks, so there's out there listening. I just wanna add, when we get calls about, I wanna be on a sports team and I want a Covid exemption. Yep.  Eugene Volokh: There you go. There you go. Eugene Volokh: And in states that have, uh, these kinds of RFRA rules, you may very well get such an exception. Okay, so let's look at ex at an example of something that, uh, that pretty clearly wouldn't. Uh, viewed as basis for an exemption. Let's say somebody says, you know, I, my religion tells me that men and women shouldn't work together because that's contrary to modesty rules. Eugene Volokh: So I'm not gonna hire this woman to work in this particular secluded place to right next to a man because, you know, he was there first and I'm not gonna fire him, and I'm not gonna hire a woman to work with him. That violates anti-discrimination. and, but the person says, you know, my religion tells me that it would be sinful for me to put men and women in a situation where there may be temptation. Eugene Volokh: Well, okay, maybe that substantially burdens your religious beliefs, but there's a compelling government interest in ensuring equal opportunity and employment and making sure that women or men or others aren't handicapped in, in getting in, in, in developing their careers this way. So that, so that's just a reminder that restrictions on conduct. Eugene Volokh: Are often permissible, even if restrictions on speech wouldn't be, let's say for example, he says, I want to speak out urging all anti-discrimination laws be repealed. He has every right to do that. The First Amendment obviously protects his right to argue in favor of the propriety of discrimination, even if it's illegal, because what's illegal now could be made legal later. Eugene Volokh: That's part of the political process, but it doesn't mean he can violate this law. So, one question, the abortion situation. Does the law substantially burden a woman's religious beliefs? So for that, she has to be able to sincerely testify that her religion is motivating her to get an abortion. So as I understand it, at least many rabbis say that. Eugene Volokh: Women should get an abortion to avoid threats to life. But of course, state laws already allow that. But also threats to physical and mental health. So if the woman concludes that she, that there would be really extremely mentally. Damaging for her to have another child whom she may be emotionally or financially unprepared to take care of. Eugene Volokh: Then in that case, she should get an abortion. So if that's so, and if the woman believes that, that's a substantial burden, by the way, if the woman just says, my religion tells me that abortions are fine, that's, that's not enough to trigger this religious exemption regime. The religion has to tell her that she actually should get it, not that it's her right to get it. Eugene Volokh: So then the question. Can the government show that there's a compelling interest in preventing abortions, and that's something that courts in those states are going to have to resolve. And that's one thing that makes this such a complicated question. How do you decide? I mean the, the statute says compelling government interest, but nobody has ever set up a clear rule as to what is a compelling government interest and what's not. Eugene Volokh: So that's what makes this an extra complicated question. Much more complicated than a lot of free speech  Susan Stone: questions. Yeah. Compelling to whom? What's compelling to you may not be compelling to me, Susan.  Eugene Volokh: I have. Right. Although the court, the statute seems to say compelling in the judges'. . That's  Susan Stone: right.  Kristina Supler: Yeah. Kristina Supler: Susan, we're here with the foremost first Amendment scholar expert in our country. I want you to ask him a question about fraternities.  Susan Stone: Are you ready? are you ready for Let's go deep. Okay. Because it's gonna be our final question. We represent a lot of students in hazing cases, and we see a lot of campuses. Susan Stone: The minute there's an allegation of hazing. Shut down the fraternity. Do students have a First Amendment associational Right to gather in a Greek organization? And, you know, do I have the right to drink beer with people under the same Greek letters or can colleges say you're out, you don't, how does that whole Right to free association. Susan Stone: I always think that's something we don't talk about in the First Amendment. Play into that decision. It's so  Kristina Supler: interesting how, uh, every day in our cases we're dealing with you know, issues that are. Teenagers, college students. But from a legal perspective, there's, there's pretty weighty constitutional issues at  Susan Stone: play at Well, yeah, and it, for my corporate partners out there, take that. Susan Stone: We have some big issues in the student and athlete defense practice. Right.  Kristina Supler: What are your thoughts on, on what's happening now with Greek organizations on college campus and, and what really feels like the push to do away with them and, and the tension? I think with freedom of association and I think that was  Susan Stone: part of litigation, correct. Susan Stone: To get rid of single sex organizations.  Eugene Volokh: Okay. So it's compliment as it, but it's often  Susan Stone: complicated. ,  Kristina Supler: so it's complicated for a couple of  Eugene Volokh: weeks. One is there are actually. Two kinds of constitutional rights that are labeled the Right to Associate and the Supreme Court in a 1983 case. Uh, Roberts, v US Jaycees actually went into this in a little bit of detail. Eugene Volokh: I'm sorry, I just looked it up. Uh, I got it wrong. 1984 Case Roberts  Susan Stone: c James. That's okay. I got the Des Moines v, the Des Moines Tinker v Des Moines Rock. So it's okay. It's okay. We're among the friends and listeners.  Eugene Volokh: Neither of those rights is actually listed in the Constitution, but the court has said for a long time, there's a right to expressive association, which is to say a right to associate in ways that promote your ability to express your views. Eugene Volokh: And for example, in a political association,  Susan Stone: I'm a Democrat, religious association Republican. Got it. Right.  Eugene Volokh: So for example, if the government were to say, Uh, that people can't form political organizations. They wanna speak, they can just speak by themselves, but they can't pool their resources in order to, uh, to express themselves. Eugene Volokh: That would be clearly unconstitutional because it would violate the right to expressive association. There's also a right to intimate association, which the court has said extends to basically small. Groups of people who are either very close friends or have to share living quarters and the like. You know my, so I'll give you an example, a  Susan Stone: little dirty on that. Susan Stone: Kristina . Sorry, I, I always go to the gutter, don't I?  Kristina Supler: Yeah, indeed. Indeed. But go  Eugene Volokh: on. So write to intimate association. Here's an example of a case where this was implicated fr it's not from the Supreme Court, but from the ninth Circuit. So out, out uh, on the West Coast, it's, but it's an important federal appellate court. Eugene Volokh: There was, a lawsuit which asked whether a roommate finding service was entitled to provide ways for people to search for roommates of the same sex and roommates or of the opposite sex, but search for roommates, bi sex and bisexual orientation, or whether that was. Whether that was impermissible housing discrimination in violation of state law, and the court said, look, yeah, that's a, as a landlord, you don't have the right, generally speaking to say, I'm not gonna rent a women or to gays, or to blacks, or to Jews, or to fundamentalist Christians. Eugene Volokh: but as a roommate, even one who's just looking for a stranger to share an apartment with you, you could say, look, you know, I'm a woman. I'm only comfortable with other women, or I'm only comfortable with straight women. I don't want a lesbian woman, or I'd prefer a lesbian woman. Or even, you know, I'm black and I wanna live with other blacks, or I'm a. Eugene Volokh: I'm of Korean extraction. I wanna live with other Koreans, or I want to keep a kosher household. And in order for that to work, I I want to live with other Jews. So that's an, the court said, I oversimplify here a little bit, but it basically said, yes, there is this right of intimate association of choosing whom you are going to live with. Eugene Volokh: So, right of expressive association, as I understand it would rarely apply to fraternities. They're not fundamentally organized in order to express their. They may in the process sometimes do that, like they may put out statements or engage in some political activity or some such, but that's very very slight part of what they do. Eugene Volokh: And in fact, in Roberts v US jcs, the court said it basically a, an adult fraternity, the Junior Chamber of Commerce, the jcs, like an adult club like that was not protected. By expressive association law, at least against application of anti-discrimination laws, it was required to let in women. On the other hand, fraternities, I think, are intimate associations. Eugene Volokh: They are groups of people living together to be sure. It's not one person, one roommate. It could be a couple of dozen people or more living together, but they do live together. They share household chores. They do, as I understand, it takes seriously the notion that they're supposed to become friends and brothers and such. Eugene Volokh: So they may have. Not under the First Amendment right of expressive association, but under the 14th Amendment right of Intimate Association. But the question is how far those rights extend. So I think if a university said, public university said, if you belong to a single sex fraternal or seral organization, we will expel you. Eugene Volokh: That would be as unconstitutional as saying, we'll expel you for marrying someone or we'll expel you for having as a roommate someone who is of the same sex as you, or the opposite sex or whatever else. That would be an interference with their right of intimate association  Susan Stone: under the 14th amendment. Eugene Volokh: Uh, exactly. However, let's say the university. You know, what you do off campus property is entirely up to you. And if you wanna live off campus with some people who, and call it a fraternity, it's all the same to us as if you wanna live with some camp, some people off campus and call it a roommates, however, If you want access to certain on-campus housing that we have historically leased to fraternities or sororities, well, we're gonna say no. Eugene Volokh: We're only gonna release them now from now on to kind of unisex groups, groups that allow members of both sexes. Well, there, the government would be acting essentially as landlords and would have a good deal of authority to say, you know, our property, we want our property to be used for. Unisex groups and not for single sex groups. Eugene Volokh: So a lot depends on the particular rules that the institutions are, are creating. And of course, a lot also depends on whether it's a private institution or not. Cuz if it's a private institution, it's not bound by constitutional by, by 14th Amendment rules or First amendment rules. Uh, and the first place, because it's not the. Eugene Volokh: Thank you  Kristina Supler: so much. Good food for thought today. This 14th amendment issue in particular, not on my radar, so I've learned a great deal today, but it's been such a pleasure speaking with you, Eugene. We're really grateful for your time today.  Susan Stone: and I am so happy that I inched myself up. Eugene was actually talking, do you remember about the use of pseudonyms? Susan Stone: Mm-hmm. and at our conference, and we often file as John Doe, so we were listening to what you had to say because we usually have had our motions for pseudonyms. Granted very important issue. And very important issue. Yes. And I have to tell you, trying to cover. All of the First Amendment issues that we wrestle with in our practice in the span of an hour. Susan Stone: Impossible, but you have boiled it down. Did anyone ever tell you to write First Amendment for Dummies? I would be the first to buy that copy and well, I  Eugene Volokh: will say I did put together. Thanks for the generous, uh, thanks to Generous Grant by the Stanton Foundation. I put together. A series of 10 videos called Free Speech Rules. Eugene Volokh: So if you go to free speech rules.org, one word, or you search for free speech rules, and especially Embolic on YouTube, you'll find these videos. They're mostly aimed at kind of high school students and college students. They're kind of snappy and short and graphical, wonderful. But you know, I think all of us might like something snappy and short and graphical. Eugene Volokh: So they'll actually cover not all of the First Amendment by any means, but some of the issues. College student speech, high school student speech, and the luck.  Susan Stone: I love it. And thank you for sharing that everyone please check it out in and check it out. And thanks for being on Real talk with Susan and Kristina.

Innocent Wife Has No Right to Recover for Criminal Conduct of Husband Causing Damage Public Policy of State Requires Exclusion of Criminal Conduct On October 14, 2019-while the Safeway policy was in effect-Mr. Moon backed the Vehicle into a police vehicle while attempting to flee from the police (the "Incident"). In Kristen Moon v. Safeway Insurance Company Of Louisiana, No. 2022-CA-0455, Court of Appeals of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit (December 6, 2022). FACTUAL BACKGROUND Safeway issued an automobile liability policy to Ms. Moon covering a vehicle that she personally owned (the "Vehicle"). Ms. Moon's husband, Herbert Moon, was listed on the policy as a permissive user. The following day, the police informed Ms. Moon that her husband had been arrested and that the Vehicle had been towed. Thereafter, Ms. Moon filed a claim with Safeway for the property damages to the Vehicle that occurred as a result of the Incident. Safeway denied Ms. Moon's claim based on the criminal and intentional acts exclusions (the "Exclusions") in its policy. Following Safeway's denial of her claim, Ms. Moon sued Safeway. Ms. Moon prayed for not only property damages, but also penalties for bad faith refusal to pay her claim. After answering the suit, Safeway filed a summary judgment motion based on the Exclusions. Safeway supported its summary judgment motion with an affidavit from its representative, Rhonda Marshall; and a copy of the deposition of the investigating officer, Christopher Bassil. Attached to Ms. Marshall's affidavit was a certified copy of Safeway's policy. The criminal charges included aggravated criminal damage to property, a violation of La. R.S. 14:55, for striking the police vehicle. DISCUSSION Whether an insurance policy provides for-or precludes-coverage as a matter of law is an issue that can be resolved within the framework of a summary judgment motion. In analyzing insurance policies, the following elementary legal principles apply: An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed by using the general rules of interpretation of contracts set forth in the Civil Code.[3] THE POLICY The Safeway policy language at issue provides that under Part IV-Physical Damages-the policy does not apply to criminal or intentional acts. The Exclusions, as applied are clear and unambiguous; and the applicability of the Exclusions to the facts on which the suit is based - the Incident - is not in dispute. Rather, Ms. Moon's contention is that the Exclusions are contrary to public policy and, for that reason, should not be enforced because she was innocent and had nothing to do with the criminal conduct of Mr. Moon. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma/support

In this special Halloween edition, we take a "stab" at assessing two of our Fright Night favorites...Frankenstein's Monster (The Creature) and The Wolf Man! Discover what creepy criminogenic criteria may lurk beneath the surface for these two monsters, and what in the world might a case plan look like?!?!? Tune in if you dare! And remember to keep telling yourselves...it's only a podcast...it's only a podcast...BOO!! The Psychology of Criminal Conduct text Criminogenic Needs Explained video R-N-R meets Desistance video

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Rani John, a Partner in the dispute resolution team at Ashurst returns in the third episode of the Investigations Unpacked podcast series, "Something to see here", to speak to Kate Morgan SC, a senior barrister with extensive experience in the defence of white collar crime proceedings, about the impact of potential criminal conduct on the dynamics of an investigation.  The discussion covers: Co-operation with law enforcement when investigating conduct that might involve criminal offences Conducting interviews of employees in that context Issues relating to separate representation and individual privileges. The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

MSNBC's Ari Melber hosts "The Beat" on Wednesday, August 3. In a once unthinkable step, a former President pleads the fifth, refusing to answer questions under oath in a New York. The deposition comes after losing a long battle to duck testimony with New York Attorney General Letitia James. Asha Rangappa, a former FBI Special Agent and former RNC Chairman Michael Steele join.

(note: time stamps are without ads & may be off a little)This week Beth and Wendy discuss the case of Jerome Dennis, an American convicted serial killer who, while on parole for a prior rape conviction, allegedly kidnapped and murdered five women and girls in two cities in Essex County, New Jersey between 1991 and 1992. This episode was suggested to us by Milton and researched by Minnie.First, we dive into the setting (10:52), the killers early life (23:58) and the timeline (28:15). Then, we get into the investigation & arrest (38:55), "Where are they now?" (47:37) followed by our takeaways and what we think made the perp snap (51:11). As usual we close out the show with some tips on how not to get murdered and our shout outs (57:46). This episode was researched & scripted by Minnie Williams.Thanks for listening! This is a weekly podcast and new episodes drop every Thursday, so until next time... look alive guys, it's crazy out there!SponsorsBetter HelpBetterhelp.com/fruit10% off your first month!Best FiendsDownload Best Fiends free on the Apple App Store or Google Play!Apple https://apps.apple.com/us/app/best-fiends-puzzle-adventure/id868013618Google Play https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.Seriously.BestFiends&hl=en_US&gl=USModern FertilityGet $20 off your fertility test when you go to https://modernfertility.com/fruit/Shout OutsThe Most Hated Man on The Internet on Netflixhttps://www.netflix.com/title/81387065Drink Champs podcasthttps://drinkchamps.com/Criminal Conduct podcasthttp://criminalconduct.net/Where to find us:Our Facebook page is Fruitloopspod and our discussion group is Fruitloopspod Discussion on Facebook; https://www.facebook.com/groups/fruitloopspod/We are also on Twitter and Instagram @fruitloopspodPlease send any questions or comments to fruitloopspod@gmail.com or leave us a voicemail at 602-935-6294. We just might read your email or play your voicemail on the show!Want to Support the show?You can support the show by rating and reviewing Fruitloops on iTunes, or anywhere else that you get your podcasts from. We would love it if you gave us 5 stars!You can make a donation on the Cash Apphttps://cash.me/$fruitloopspodOr become a monthly Patron through our Podbean Patron pagehttps://patron.podbean.com/fruitloopspodFootnotesArticles/WebsitesWikipedia contributors. (07/11/2022). Jerome Dennis (serial killer). Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 07/18/2022 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome_Dennis_(serial_killer)Murderpedia. (n.d.). Jerome Dennis. Retrieved 07/19/2022 from https://murderpedia.org/male.D/d/dennis-jerome.htmWikipedia contributors. (06/26/2022). New Jersey State Prison. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 07/18/2022 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Jersey_State_PrisonThe Courier-News. (04/14/1992). Parolee admits 5 slayings - East Orange residents skeptical. Retrieved 07/22/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/image/223128790/Cataffo, L. (04/19/1992). East Orange Nightmare. The Record. Retrieved 07/22/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/image/496535338/The Record. (04/17/1992). E. Orange suspect charged again. Retrieved 07/22/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/image/496535158/Kladko, B. (06/23/1997). Kanka killing didn't just shock; it also left legacy. The Central New Jersey Home News. Retrieved 07/22/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/image/318856579/New Jersey State Police. (n.d.). William Dennis Jr. Retrieved 07/22/2022 from https://www.icrimewatch.net/offenderdetails.php?OfndrID=2329127&AgencyID=55260Strum, C. (04/15/1992). A Model Inmate, and Now a Suspect Again; New Jersey Officials Say Parolee Accused in 5 Slayings Showed No Signs of Trouble. The New York Times. Retrieved 07/22/2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/1992/04/15/nyregion/model-inmate-now-suspect-again-new-jersey-officials-say-parolee-accused-5.htmlUPI Archives. (04/13/1992). Man charged in five killings. Retrieved 07/22/2022 from https://www.upi.com/Archives/1992/04/13/Man-charged-in-five-killings/6882703137600/Strum, C. (04/14/1992). Paroled Rapist Charged With Killing 5 Women in New Jersey. The New York Times. Retrieved 07/26/2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/1992/04/14/nyregion/paroled-rapist-charged-with-killing-5-women-in-new-jersey.htmlThe New York Times. (02/28/1993). Guilty Plea to Killing 5 New Jersey Women. Retrieved 07/26/2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/1993/02/28/nyregion/guilty-plea-to-killing-5-new-jersey-women.htmlAsbury Park Press. (03/14/1992). Parolee charged with 5 slayings. Retrieved 07/26/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/image/145152910/Strum, C. (04/20/1992). Killing City's Dreams; East Orange Sorrows Over 6 Deaths. The New York Times. Retrieved 07/26/2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/1992/04/20/nyregion/killing-city-s-dreams-east-orange-sorrows-over-6-deaths.htmlCarper, A. and Wright, C. (04/14/1992). Is terror over?. Newsday. Retrieved 07/27/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/clip/94295808/is-terror-over/Aree, R.. (04/14/1992). Too little, too late. Newsday. Retrieved 07/27/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/image/706491541Chan, Y. and O'Shaughnessy, P.. (04/12/1992). Sixth body found. Daily News. Retrieved 07/27/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/clip/99626217/sixth-body-found/Marzulli, J. and Kappstatter, B. (04/14/1992). Arrest in N.J. deaths. Daily News. Retrieved 07/28/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/clip/99987422/arrest-in-nj-deaths/Hunter-Hodge, K. and Kirtzman, A. (04/13/1992). FBI joining N.J. slay hunt. Daily News. Retrieved 07/28/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/clip/99181830/fbi-joining-nj-slay-hunt/Pieretti, F. (03/12/1993). Man Sentenced to Life in Slayings That Terrorized New Jersey Town. AP News. Retrieved 07/28/2022 from https://apnews.com/article/51debc970ee3f31f46f4d6d794a9d5e3The Courier-News. (02/27/1993). Parolee admits killing 5 women in terror spree. Retrieved 07/28/2022 from https://www.newspapers.com/clip/99626515/parolee-admits-killing-5-women-in/Strum, C. (04/12/1992). Killings of 5 in East Orange Being Investigated for Links. The New York Times. Retrieved 07/28/2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/1992/04/12/nyregion/killings-of-5-in-east-orange-being-investigated-for-links.htmlHistoryNew Jersey Institute of Technology. (2019). Christopher Columbus Homes. Retrieved 07/20/2022 from https://dana.njit.edu/items/show/278Vergara, C. J. (1980) Christopher Columbus' Homes, Newark 1980. [Photograph]. Library of Congress. Retrieved 07/20/2022 from https://www.loc.gov/item/2020697884/Levy, C. (03/07/1994). 4 High-Rises Torn Down By Newark. The New York Times. Retrieved 07/22/2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/07/nyregion/4-high-rises-torn-down-by-newark.htmlWikipedia contributors. (06/28/2022). Murder of Megan Kanka. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 07/22/2022 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Megan_KankaWikipedia contributors. (07/21/2022). New Jersey. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 07/27/2022 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_JerseyHartman, D. and Lewis, B. (2022). A Walk Through Newark. Thirteen. Media with Impact. Retrieved 07/27/2022 from https://www.thirteen.org/newark/history2.htmlGross, Terry. (05/03/2017). A 'Forgotten History' Of How The U.S. Government Segregated America. NPR. Retrieved 07/27/2022 from https://www.npr.org/2017/05/03/526655831/a-forgotten-history-of-how-the-u-s-government-segregated-americaJones, Richard G. (04/17/2008). Former Mayor Guilty of Fraud in Newark Sales. The New York Times. Retrieved 07/27/2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/nyregion/17james.htmlNJ.gov. (1992). Section II State Summary and Offense Analysis. Retrieved 07/27/2022 from https://nj.gov/njsp/info/ucr1992/pdf/1992_sect_2.pdfBooksCook, G. (2008). The War Zone A Story of Christopher Columbus Homes Newark New Jersey Projects People Who Lived There Second Edition (148 pp). Lulu.com. How Not to Get Murdered27 Amazing Personal Safety Tips That Will Change Your Lifehttps://bestlifeonline.com/safety-tips/Music“Abyss” by Alasen: ●https://soundcloud.com/alasen●https://twitter.com/icemantrap ●https://instagram.com/icemanbass/●https://soundcloud.com/therealfrozenguy●Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License“Lean and Pills”, “Gotta Get It” & “Trap Beat 6” by AruloMixkit Stock Music Free Licensehttps://mixkit.co/free-stock-music/trap/“Furious Freak” by Kevin MacLeodLink: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3791-furious-freakLicense: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Connect with us on:Twitter @FruitLoopsPodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/fruitloopspodFacebook https://www.facebook.com/Fruitloopspod and https://www.facebook.com/groups/fruitloopspod

Town Square with Ernie Manouse airs at 3 p.m. CT. Tune in on 88.7FM, listen online or subscribe to the podcast. Join the discussion at 888-486-9677, questions@townsquaretalk.org or @townsquaretalk. In day eight of the January 6th hearing, the committee made the case that President Trump's refusal to intervene in the Capitol Riot was a “dereliction of his duty”. Many also say evidence shows that Trump wanted to threaten constitutional order — that he was “Executive Producer” of the insurrection. He called rioters to Washington by using war rhetoric to get them to attack the Capitol while he sat back to watch and enjoy it. But the committee seems to have put together a wise strategy of using witnesses who are primarily life-long republicans.  Not only are they appalled by Trump's actions,  they are brave enough to speak the truth — risking their lives, their family, safety, and livelihood. Is it time for us to re-examine what we expect from our elected officials? Years from now, how will history look back at this moment in time?  Our panel of experts are here to break down the latest details. Guests: Jennifer Mercieca Professor of Communication at Texas A&M University Author of “Demagogue for President: The Rhetorical Genius of Donald Trump” Mike Purdy Presidential Historian Author of  “Presidential Friendships: How They Changed History”. Timothy Naftali  Clinical Associate Professor of History and Public Service at NYU Town Square with Ernie Manouse is a gathering space for the community to come together and discuss the day's most important and pressing issues. We also offer a free podcast here, on iTunes, and other apps.

Fred Brito posed as a priest in order to hide from law enforcement. Find out how he ALMOST got away with it. __________ Follow PRETEND on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. __________ True Crime Podcast Festival 2022 in Dallas, TX We're excited to announce that Criminal Conduct is going to be attending the True Crime Podcast Festival on August 26-28th in Dallas, Texas. The Festival is specially designed around your desire to mingle, interact, and have casual conversations with the podcasters you listen to regularly. There will also be panel discussions and live episodes you can't hear anywhere else! Go to the website Truecrimepodcastfestival.com to find information on tickets and the hotel. Prices do go up the closer we get to the event so you won't want to wait. I'll see you at the True Crime Podcast Festival! __________ Listen to a preview for the Stolen Lives Podcast at the end of the episode: Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Fred Brito worked as a psychiatrist, priest, and a Red Cross fundraiser—but it was all based on lies. ______________ True Crime Podcast Festival 2022 in Dallas, TX We're excited to announce that Criminal Conduct is going to be attending the True Crime Podcast Festival on August 26-28th in Dallas, Texas. The Festival is specially designed around your desire to mingle, interact, and have casual conversations with the podcasters you listen to regularly. There will also be panel discussions and live episodes you can't hear anywhere else! Go to the website Truecrimepodcastfestival.com to find information on tickets and the hotel. Prices do go up the closer we get to the event so you won't want to wait. I'll see you at the True Crime Podcast Festival! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

David Berry took an at-home DNA test and discovered dozens of half-siblings. Was this a coincidence or the scheme of one sperm donor? ______________ True Crime Podcast Festival 2022 in Dallas, TX We're excited to announce that Criminal Conduct is going to be attending the True Crime Podcast Festival on August 26-28th in Dallas, Texas. The Festival is specially designed around your desire to mingle, interact, and have casual conversations with the podcasters you listen to regularly. There will also be panel discussions and live episodes you can't hear anywhere else! Go to the website Truecrimepodcastfestival.com to find information on tickets and the hotel. Prices do go up the closer we get to the event so you won't want to wait. I'll see you at the True Crime Podcast Festival! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Why are some women attracted to serial killers? It's a phenomenon called hybristophilia. Today's episode is about a woman named Brandi and her relationship with William Holbert. True Crime Podcast Festival 2022 in Dallas, TX We're excited to announce that Criminal Conduct is going to be attending the True Crime Podcast Festival on August 26-28th in Dallas, Texas. The Festival is specially designed around your desire to mingle, interact, and have casual conversations with the podcasters you listen to regularly. There will also be panel discussions and live episodes you can't hear anywhere else! Go to the website Truecrimepodcastfestival.com to find information on tickets and the hotel. Prices do go up the closer we get to the event so you won't want to wait. I'll see you at the True Crime Podcast Festival! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Before Wild Bill became a serial killer, he was a small-time crook swindling anyone who got in his way. ________ We're excited to announce that Criminal Conduct is going to be attending the True Crime Podcast Festival on August 26-28th in Dallas, Texas. The Festival is specially designed around your desire to mingle, interact, and have casual conversations with the podcasters you listen to regularly. There will also be panel discussions and live episodes you can't hear anywhere else! Go to the website Truecrimepodcastfestival.com to find information on tickets and the hotel. Prices do go up the closer we get to the event so you won't want to wait. I'll see you at the True Crime Podcast Festival! Follow us on social media:  Twitter Facebook Instagram Leave a review Please leave us a review on Apple Podcast. Want more? Also, check out our other podcasts: PRETEND and TWISTED.  © 2022 Creative Babble. All Rights Reserved. Today's episode features a promo for Down the Rabbit Hole podcast References: The Jolly Roger Social Club by Nick Foster Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

ATTORNEY TOM RENZ EXPOSES THE CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF FEDERAL AGENCIES

In Season 2 of PRETEND, I covered the story of a serial killer who murdered at least five American ex-pats. Three years after the story aired, I received a message from a listener who said she could put me in touch with the killer. I decided to turn my interviews with Wild Bill into an entire season of CRIMINAL CONDUCT. Listen to part 1 of Criminal Conduct season 3 then subscribe to listen to the rest: https://linktr.ee/criminalconduct Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

NO DESCRIPTION

Introducing Season 3 of Criminal Conduct, which features an interview with an American Serial Killer in Paradise. Hosts Javier Leiva and John Taylor take you to the country of Panama to investigate the disappearance of several American Expats who went missing after dealing with a man known as Wild Bill. The hosts spent several days interviewing the killer trying to figure out his motivation. Did he kill these people for money or something more sadistic?

This week we are discussing a murder that rocked a small Amish community. Thank you to Haley Gray with Haley Gray Research for your help in the episode!  Thank you to this week's sponsors! Subscribe and listen to Season three of Criminal Conduct so you don't miss an episode! Go to www.grove.com/MM today to get a free gift set worth up to $50 with your first order. Plus, shipping is fast and FREE. Now is a great time to try Thrive Causemetics for yourself! Right now, you can get 15% off your first order when you visit www.thrivecausemetics.com/MOMS for 15% off your first order. This podcast is sponsored by BetterHelp and Moms and Murder listeners get 10% off their first month at www.BetterHelp.com/moms. Listen and subscribe to Melissa's other podcast, Criminality!! It's the podcast for those who love reality TV, true crime, and want to hear all the juicy stories where the two genres intersect. Subscribe and listen here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/criminality/id1551366002.  If you'd like to support The Mom's and get some fun perks, including bonus episodes and early release- ad free episodes, you can check out our Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/momsandmurderpodcast. As always, you can find us on Twitter, Instagram, and on our website at https://momsandmurder.com. Make sure you subscribe and rate our show to help others find us! We updated our merch store, you can find that at momsandmurder.threadless.com!  Connect with us on social media at:Facebook.com/MomsAndRedRum Instagram: @MomsAndMurder Twitter.com/MomsAndMurder Sources can be found at: https://momsandmurder.com/the-murder-of-barbara-weave Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episode 15: “Wild Bill” HolbertJoin Javier from the podcasts Criminal Conduct and Pretend as he digs into a case that is beyond bizarre – that of serial killer William Dathan Holbert II, aka Wild Bill. Holbert was the leader of the Southern National Patriots white nationalist group in North Carolina until he went on the run after he and his partner were accused of illegal activities there. After eluding police, they settled in Panama and changed their name to Cortez. There Holbert was responsible for the murders of five Americans who owned properties that Holbert wanted. He buried his victims in his backyard. He is also believed to have killed a sixth victim, a lawyer he confessed to murdering. Holbert is notorious for his charisma, and even in prison for the murders, has gained a devoted following.

Episode 104 Annie KasprzakAnnie Kasprzak was a product of the foster system, being bounced around as a child. But when she was adopted by the kasprzak family, things began to look up for her and she finally had the solid foundation of a family to love and protect her. But when her adopted parents divorced, the shakeup within the family coupled with typical teenager issues caused some rebellion in Annie. When Annie was 15, she began dating a boy around her age named Chris Bagshaw. Annie thought that they were in love and soon, she began to tell her close friends that she was pregnant and wanted to run away with Chris. Then one day, she vanished from her Draper, Utah home leaving a note behind. As her frantic parents worked with police, the body of a young girl was pulled out of the Jordan river, and was quickly determined to be Annie. She had been severely beaten and tossed into the water. Police suspected Annie's boyfriend Chris early on, but after being given a tip by a supposed witness, they went in a different direction. When the tip proved to be bogus info, investigators came back to Chris, and this time they found crucial evidence implicating him in the murder of his girlfriend. Ultimately, he was found guilty and sent to prison. Annie's family was left to wonder what the future may have had in store for Annie if she had the chance to flourish with the support of a loving family. Instead, Annie's life was cut short by someone who supposedly cared for her. Annie's mom Veronica discusses this sad and tragic case in this episode.This episode is sponsored by Sundance Now, and the podcast, Criminal ConductTry Sundance Now streaming service free for 30 days by using promo code MURDERINMYFAMILY at Sundancenow.com Check out season 3 of the podcast Criminal Conduct here-http://criminalconduct.net/To support this podcast with a donation, you can do so via Patreon at:https://www.patreon.com/TheMurderInMyFamilyor through Paypal at:https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/themurderinmyfamilyTo contact the podcast or learn more about the case we discuss, please visit:TheMurderInMyFamily.com

Season 3 of Criminal Conduct features an interview with an American Serial Killer in Paradise.  Hosts Javier Leiva and John Taylor take you to the country of Panama to investigate the disappearance of several American Expats who went missing after dealing with a man known as Wild Bill.  The hosts spent several days interviewing the killer trying to figure out his motivation. Did he kill these people for money or something more sadistic?  Follow us on social media:  Twitter Facebook Instagram Leave a review Please leave us a review on Apple Podcast. Want more? Also, check out our other podcasts: PRETEND and TWISTED.  References: The Jolly Roger Social Club by Nick Foster © 2022 Creative Babble. All Rights Reserved. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Season 3 of Criminal Conduct returns on February 18th. "An American Serial Killer in Paradise" is the story of Wild Bill and his victims. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Thrilled  to be sharing our conversation with the one and only Dr. James Bonta! We discuss the back story behind his seminal book, The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, and all things Risk-Need-Responsivity.  A must listen for probation and parole officers, corrections officials and anyone interested in effective interventions and approaches to utilize with justice involved individuals.  PCC text:      https://www.amazon.com/Psychology-Criminal-Conduct-James-Bonta/dp/1138935778 The Criminologist channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCw1d_twLd7CdnDgS7amNpuQ

On this episode of WTF California podcast, we go into depth about what court documents actually say on Antioch Mayor Lamar Thorpe and City Clerk Ellie Householder after Antioch Police Department performed search warrants in January.  We wonder since this is only off one phone, what else could be out there? Meanwhile in the City of Oakland, community leaders demanding Governor Gavin Newsom declare state of emergency over violent crime as they want more police. We talk about homelessness, Ab 369 in paying doctors to give street medicine to homeless and tidbits of other things around the state. Articles from the Show: Antioch Search Warrants Reveal Mayor and City Clerk Engaged in Possible Criminal Conduct Man Shot While Driving on Eastbound Highway 4 Tuesday Afternoon Oakland community leaders demand Newsom declare state of emergency over violent crime Police: Man arrested for allegedly breaking into San Jose home, sexually assaulting 8-year-old girl Two 15-year-old girls accused of setting elementary school on fire, causing $1 million in damages Los Angeles City Council sets goal to add 25,000 units of homeless housing by 2025 County Bans Homeless Encampments In Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones Sacramento city leaders unanimously approve $100 million homeless plan Sacramento Mayor Steinberg defends homeless plan before city council vote AB-369: California considering paying doctors to give street medicine to homeless College professor suspected of setting 7 fires in California Former La Mesa officer falsified arrest report, prosecutors say In blistering drought, California farmers rip up precious almond trees Truckers Petition U.S. Supreme Court To Reverse Appellate Court Decision, Remain Exempt From AB 5 Law PepsiCo and Boston Beer Co. to create alcoholic Mountain Dew

 You might know how to recording, edit and upload, but there's a lot they don't teach you in podcasting school. In this episode, Pretend Podcast and Criminal Conduct's Javier Leiva joins Jason and Cee Cee to talk about the 10 things they don't teach you in podcasting school! And with Javier's over 2 million downloads and Jason and Cee Cee's over 500 podcasts produced, the three have learned a thing or two along the way. Listen to the Pretend Podcast or Criminal Conduct.The Earfluence Podcast is a production of Earfluence Media and is hosted by Jason Gillikin and Cee Cee Huffman.

Criminal Conduct is back with a brand new case. This season, John and Javier investigate a rogue constable in Kentucky accused of planting drugs, stealing money, and shaking people down. Like a police officer, a constable can carry a gun, a badge and drive around town with blue lights. However, unlike police, a constable has all the powers of a sheriff. He answers to no one but the voters on election day. And there's one constable and Kentucky who got our attention. Michael Wallace was first elected constable in 2006. He's known around Pulaski County, Kentucky, for his tough stance against drugs. Constable Wallace doesn't just arrest suspected criminals. He also mocks them on his Facebook page. He stakes signs in front of the suspect's homes that read, "This Drug House Closed for Business, Compliments of the Pulaski County Constable's Office, Michael 'Wally' Wallace." How do constables make money in Kentucky? A constable in Kentucky can keep up to 85% of the cash he seizes and a percentage of the proceeds from the property he takes. But other constables have found different ways of making money. Constable Wallace's suspects say he doesn't just seize their property— he steals their cash too.  This season, we're tracking Constable Wallace to find out how he gets away with his style of law enforcement. ____________ Today's episode was written and produced by John Taylor and Javier Leiva A special thanks to our executive producer: Advertisecast and Ruby Rose Fox, for allowing us to use her song, "Bury the Body."  Follow us on social media:  Twitter Facebook Instagram Leave a review Please leave us a review on Apple Podcast. Want more? Also, check out our other podcasts: PRETEND and TWISTED. © 2021 Creative Babble. All Rights Reserved. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week's episode is actually the first episode of my other podcast CRIMINAL CONDUCT. I wanted you, PRETEND listeners to get a sneak peek before it's debut on April 16th. If you like this episode, subscribe to the CRIMINAL CONDUCT feed to listen to the full episode. -------- Criminal Conduct is back with a brand new case. This season, John and Javier investigate a rogue constable in Kentucky who is accused of planting drugs, stealing money, and shaking people down. Like a police officer, a constable can carry a gun, a badge and drive around town with blue lights. However, unlike police, a Constable has all the powers of a sheriff. He answers to no one but the voters on election day. Criminal Conduct season 2 returns April 16th. http://criminalconduct.net/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Criminal Conduct is back with a brand new case. This season, John and Javier investigate a rogue constable in Kentucky who is accused of planting drugs, stealing money, and shaking people down. Like a police officer, a constable can carry a gun, a badge and drive around town with blue lights. However, unlike police, a Constable has all the powers of a sheriff. He answers to no one but the voters on election day. Criminal Conduct season 2 returns April 16th. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Content Warnings: Drug mention, Drug Use 0:46:30-0:51:00, Anti-Vaxxish Rhetoric (from an evil NPC) 1:24:00-1:28:00 [A Family Groupchat] MOM: I can't believe Borage is graduating (again haha kidding I love you son!!) GRANDMA: I'm so proud of him! Not many people can say they've collected four masters! COUSIN 1: Not sure most people try... AUNT: Comfrey, don't you start! This is your cousin's big day! AUNT 2: Besides, we're still waiting on someone to graduate, we may as well get our practice in COMFREY: Mom! GRANDMA: Be nice to one of my favorite nieces.  COMFREY: "One of" COUSIN 2: She doesn't want to start a war lol GRANDPA: I WOULD LIKE A CAPPUCINO  MOM: Dad, wrong chat haha but yes sure thing COMFREY: Shit, I want a Cappucino AUNT 2: LANGUAGE COUSIN 2: This is why you're not the favorite niece :P COUSIN 3: Borage, will your friend be there? ;) BORAGE: Doubtful, but I hope so! MOM 2: I hope so too, honey THIS WEEK on Harmony — The siblings start to sort out their place in this great, big galaxy. Does Joseph Steal? Does Cain grasp the intricacies of Criminal Conduct? Well, listener! If these are questions you'd like answered, then this is an episode you DARE NOT MISS! Hosted by Rowan (@ceardannan and @pom_and_fiber) Featuring Jack (@toyourstations and itch.io) as Cain, Julianna ([not found]) as Adam, Jenny (@hereticpride) as Noah, and Vince (@Windjammah) as Joseph Produced by Vince You can find the show (@Qomrades) on Twitter or at Qomrades.com Text by Vince Cover Art by Rowan!  Note: Rowan has changed their name after this recording Thank you to Noel Shiri for the use of our Theme song "Sentient Babies" (Noel Shiri on Bandcamp and @noelshiri on Twitter)  You can find Vince and Jack's other podcast at aapapappod You can find the Let's Plays Vince makes at TheHereticRoad.com

Jacques and Jennifer talk about the latest scandals around the 19 SAS soldiers in allegedly committing murders in Afghanistan - whether this can be put down to 'a few bad apples', or whether it is a natural extension of our military's ways of doing things...?    

This episode covers criminal conduct and danger! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

In this very special Halloween episode, we take a "stab" at assessing two of our fright night favorites...Frankenstein's Monster and The Wolf Man! What Criminogenic variables might these two possess, and what on earth would their case plans looks like!?  Tune in if you dare...and remember to keep telling yourself...it's only a podcast...its only a podcast....Boo!       Criminogenic Needs Explained video:    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=filtuNCRqvg&t=6s RNR Meets Desistance video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgpX7_3iWxo  The Psychology of Criminal Conduct: https://www.amazon.com/Psychology-Criminal-Conduct-James-Bonta/dp/1138935778

Thanks for sponsoring the show at https://www,pateon.com/republickeeper 120 – Welcome to the R K P Show opener Give the phone # 866-988-8311 info@republickeeper.com Feds starting to charge with crimes where locals won’t. Left complaining of “chilling effect” – correct. Soros Fox Gingrich Clip Fox Response Calls for drastic criminal justice and police reforms have swept the country since the death of George Floyd, but local prosecutors already are making waves on that front -- in a sign that under-the-radar political investments made by progressive groups in recent years are paying off. District attorneys and current candidates whose campaigns benefited from the work of left-wing organizations – including ones backed by liberal billionaire George Soros – are now pushing for new practices that could see sharp reductions in prosecutions and incarcerations. Soros, through the Justice & Public Safety PAC and other groups, has been spending millions of dollars on prosecutorial races in recent years, with a number of beneficiaries making headlines since their elections. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, who was boosted by Soros in her campaign, drew controversy when she announced her office was bringing felony charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who brandished guns outside their home as protesters marched by in June. The McCloskeys have said many times they were defending themselves, with tensions high in St. Louis and other cities over race and law enforcement. They said the crowd of demonstrators broke an iron gate marked with "No Trespassing" and "Private Street" signs, and that some threatened them. Another high-profile prosecutor who has been backed by Soros in the past is Cook County, Ill. State's Attorney Kim Foxx. Foxx drew national attention when she dismissed the case against actor Jussie Smollett, who had been accused of faking a hate crime attack against himself. The case was later taken over by a special prosecutor who filed new charges. Foxx is seeking reelection this year and already won her Democratic primary. Regarding ongoing protests in her jurisdiction, she has said that her office will lean toward dismissing cases coming from protests or curfew violations (Mayor Lori Lightfoot imposed a curfew between May 30 and June 6 after a George Floyd protest). “The question it comes down to is, is it a good use of our time and resources?” Foxx told the Chicago Sun-Times. “No, it’s not.” Looking at her term in office, a report from the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund found a 13 percent decline in guilty pleas or verdicts in felony cases and a 39 percent increase in dropped or lost cases after Foxx took office in 2016. San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, another beneficiary of Soros-tied contributions, recently defended the movement to defund police. In a discussion with Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., earlier in July, Boudin questioned whether money going to police was “the most effective” use of taxpayer dollars. Boudin is also one of a number of district attorneys participating in "Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commissions," teaming with the Grassroots Law Project, an organization co-founded by activist Shaun King that calls for defunding police. The other district attorneys who are participating in these commissions are Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner and Suffolk County, Mass., DA Rachael Rollins, who have both benefited from Soros’ support. Krasner, who was elected after Soros put $1.45 million into a political action committee that supported him, has also taken a public stance regarding events that have spun out of the protests over Floyd’s death, particularly the federal response to violent demonstrations in cities like Portland. In a Washington Post op-ed he co-wrote with Baltimore DA Marilyn Mosby, Krasner threatened to have federal officers arrested and charged if they overstep their authority in his jurisdiction, after officers in Portland were accused of using excessive force. “Should Trump send federal agents who engage in the same illegal vigilante activities, unlawfully assaulting and kidnapping people, they will face criminal charges from our offices,” Krasner and Mosby said. In Contra Costa County, Calif., District Attorney Diana Becton – also backed by Soros – changed how her office handles police shooting cases, removing deputy district attorney Barry Grove from his role as the main prosecutor in such cases, switching to a team approach, according to the Mercury News. Becton also announced earlier this month that she was filing hate crime charges against Nichole Anderson and David Nelson, White people who were allegedly caught painting over a Black Lives Matter mural. Orlando State Attorney candidate Monique Worrell is also backed by a group linked to Soros in her quest to fill the seat that will be vacated by Aramis Ayala, who was also supported by Soros. Worrell’s platform calls for an end to cash bail, which would result in more defendants being released before their trial. She also says that incarceration should be a “last resort,” and that those who do not pose “a threat to the physical safety of others” should not be placed behind bars. Worrell’s opponent Ryan Williams has cited the Soros connection as a point of attack, and Worrell has accused Williams of playing on anti-Semitic tropes by mentioning Soros’ involvement. But the Jewish political philanthropist is not the only player in the game of prosecutorial campaigns. Real Justice PAC, also co-founded by Shaun King, has supported 29 head prosecutors and state attorneys general since 2018, including several who were also backed by Soros, such as Gardner, Boudin, Rollins and Becton. The organization is also backing the 2020 campaigns of Foxx and 13 other candidates seeking office. The organization's goals include electing – and recruiting – candidates who would make changes to criminal justice systems such as ending cash bail and “rolling back practices that lead to mass incarceration.” One 2020 candidate Real Justice succeeded in getting elected already is Multnomah County, Ore., District Attorney Mike Schmidt, who will be in a key position when he takes office on Aug. 1, given that his jurisdiction includes Portland, where riots have been taking place amid months of protests following Floyd’s death. Schmidt has said that he would potentially drop charges against nonviolent protesters when he is in office, according to local NBC affiliate KGW Delia Garza, who won the Democratic primary in Travis County, Texas, and will run unopposed in November, is also backed by Real Justice. Garza has already said that her office will decline to prosecute certain types of cases. “We’re not going to prosecute low-level drug offenses. We’re not going to prosecute crimes that are an extension of someone being in poverty, basically,” Garza said, according to KXAN. “You know, we’re going to look at the way that we prosecute crimes like prostitution, because so many times those things, those kinds of crimes are related to poverty in some kind of way.” Trasnscript: 124 - Fox Silences Gingrich - Is George Soros behind lax prosecutions? 00:00:05 - 00:05:03 A. Republican podcast. Brian O'Kelly I will be your host for today's adventure. Broadcasting from the forest in cottage link Washington just outside of Seattle on my Russian maidens octave. Microphone this is podcast number one. Hit me up on twitter parlor. facebook whatever your voice is club. It's ask Brian. Your Bro in all of those cases. And so and the Republicans Dot Com website, which is a work in progress and should be. Vastly improved by Monday. Let's begin this program like every other by thanking God for good health and the ability to here sharing with you. Happy. Friday. If you're listening on the livestream on facebook on twitter on. Youtube and now on daily motion also. Thank you for your time and attention I'm grateful for it and hope everybody's off to a good start. for the day and Let's see. We've got a whole bunch of stuff going on and Yesterday I played a clip of. Speaker Gingrich was on the. Show outnumbered there with Harris Faulkner and Melissa Francis and what the Speaker had to say was that he thought that the big problem was that these. Attorneys district attorneys are not taking care of business and prosecuting people. and. The hosts seemed a little bit put off by that. And They There was fourteen seconds of dead air. As a result and Harris Wagner has come back and responded to that but I'm decided that I wanted to see keep hearing about George Soros, and I don't really know about George Soros other than the rumors and so on a here and I decided that wasn't good enough and I wanted to learn a little bit more for myself and so and for you I figured if I don't know you probably don't so we can learn together. So first let's go and set up in case you have missed this out there this is what I'm referencing that happened with. Speaker Gingrich on the show outnumbered on Fox I guess this would have been on Tuesday. Hero whose lives have been destroyed by this violence. They represent every. Speaker Gingrich have a final thought for us. Look, the number one problem in almost all these cities is George Soros elected left wing anti police, pro criminal district attorneys who refuse to keep people locked up. Just yesterday they put somebody back on the street who's wanted for two different murders in New York City. You cannot solve this problem and both powers and by. Have talked very. About what they call progressive the district. Attorney's progressive. District attorneys are anti police pro criminal in overwhelmingly elected with George sources, money, and their major cause of the violence we're seeing who's they keep putting violent criminals back on the street. I'm not sure we need to bring George listen to this. I was going to get the last word Paker. He he paid for it. So here's the. Teen seconds. I agree it. Doesn't need to be a part of this conversation. One two, three, four, five, though it's six seven. Eight. Nine, ten eleven twelve. Ten, move on fourteen. Courtesy House. We have our network team. Gist an absolute eternity for that much debt air to happen and so. I don't know if somebody was speaking in Harris faulkners ear or what was going on while that was happening but she came out and said something about it. Afterwards. Here is what Harris Faulkner had to say. So we had a little incident on the show yesterday that was not smooth, and while I was leading that segment, we had interruptions and I sat silently while all of that played out. Also not ideal our guest former. House Speaker Newt Gingrich who was beloved and needed to be allowed to speak with the openness and respect that the show is all about. was interrupted. Do we debate with fire here? Yes but we must also give each other space to express ourselves. As the only original member of the six year old amazing daytime ride known outnumbered I. 00:05:03 - 00:10:00 Especially want to rock and roll with every voice in perspective at the table we don't censor on the show. And that's why we're winning weekdays at noon. I found that answer to be somewhat unsatisfactory candidly. I don't think that was For me that's not enough and you know there was an interruption and now I think the interruption was that you talked about George Soros and or that Nigga. Mr. Newt talked about George Soros and does appear that that is a sin that is not allowed on Fox News and I had absolutely no more no idea. It's the title on the on the livestream Thursday. I keep forgetting to update it before I start to livestream of all the things I'm doing but I'll get I'll get that down I need to just probably change it to live broadcast and it's always right. So sorry about that and probably need to. How to do that? During one of these video clips update are regardless. Glenn Beck used to be a Fox News host and Glenn Beck. was run out of the network and Glenn Beck says it was because he was talking about George Soros I will tell you that George Soros is not to be discussed. It is verboten You know when I got down to the end one of the things at Fox News they were starting to tell me I can't talk about things. They just talk about this stop talking about that one of them was God. One of them was Israel and the other one was George Soros and if you remember Glen You won't play the game. The problem with you is you won't play the game. If you've ever heard me tell that story that conversation started with George Soros. So the problem with us, you won't play the game and what that means that you won't shut up about the things that we don't want to talk about. and. So. All right. Well, that's weird. So this is supposed to be the right wing network. We're not hearing criticism, George Soros on the left wing networks and now when he's criticized on Fox, they shut down. Speaker. Gingrich Glenn Beck says that that's why he's not on the network anymore. So okay. What do we make of that? Well? Let's learn about George Soros. So this is George Soros mostly in his own words and in his son words son's words. This is video from. The Open Society Foundation website. And standing over society is one thing trying to. Plead open societies for strengthening opus had his is something else they have to evolve they have to create themselves. And that process is never ending process people are free and they want to hide behind. Orders. Use oversight and it sounded ways in order to have an open society you have to mediate the tension between equality and liberty popular sovereignty and individual freedom is a difficult task. The foundation does more than fun projects with. Certain things. One has to fight for even who is not properly if you believe in something. And you have the convictions. Towards it. You can really withstand. Surmountable odds I. Really. Fight fight. Society is always in danger. and. Renew itself being tested. And surviving. and. So that's that's George Soros and his son there, and you know it all sounds good open society and but you heard the one guy in there say that people are fearful. So they want to hide behind borders. So when they say open what they mean and it sounds you know better than it is what they mean is societies without rules. That's what they mean by open. They. Mean you're open to do whatever you want. Without restriction. That's what it means, and that's a very different thing from what it sounds like when you say open society, it sounds. Better than it is. So Mr Newt makes this claim that George A source has paid for it. So that well, let's find out. If George Soros WHO's paid for it So. Let me just share with you some reporting from Fox, news of all places that shut down the conversation, and I'm not gonNA share the video from them as much as a some. Text and then we'll share some. 00:10:01 - 00:15:02 Audio for some candid say funded. But so here's what what they report. district attorney's and current candidates. Campaigns benefited from the work of left-wing organizations including ones backed by liberal billionaire. George Soros are pushing for new practices that could see productions in prosecutions and. incarcerations. Soros through the Justice and public safety pack and other groups has been spending millions of dollars on prosecutorial races in recent years. A number of beneficiaries making headlines since their election all right now yes remember the mccloskey's. Those are the people in Saint Louis who ended up. With the guns out on their driveway as the protesters were coming by spoke at the RNC convention and They are being prosecuted, right? and. Of course, they're being prosecuted by prosecutors not prosecuting the protesters and vandals. So, who is this prosecutor? While her name is Kim Gardner and she was elected and paid for by this justice in public safety pack that is funded by George. Soros. So here is Kim, Gardner is the bully. Pulpit this is the threats that we receive. We're doing our job to be true ministers of justice. So no policeman is GonNa tell you or any other unit will come to you and tell you if you hold us accountable, we're going to start working. We're not gonNA police your community to make you the calls or say you're the cause of violent crime in your communities and right now we're in A. Very, unique time that we have policing unions with I call him forty-five to promote divisiveness in rhetoric of this anti law enforcement where it's perpetuating a fear that is causing problems with prosecutors like our sales to promote justice and when you have people who will threaten your livelihood not just whether you do your job we'll tell you we will make it difficult for you to do your job in every way. And they have the platform to co have the media. report. It. Yeah so There she is. She's You know complaining that. The police union is telling is protecting the police and that they're protecting the police from her the prosecutor. and. So it's it's amazing that these guys don't seem to be in favor of law and order now. Remember the Jussie smollet case. This was the case where the guy shows up in In Chicago. There and he's an actor right is on the whatever the show was I don't remember the name of the show that the guy was on. But The show he was on. I. Guess. It was empire was the name of the show. Anyway he was not an important player on that show in any serious way and but he went and. Got Himself fake attacked I, guess it was a hoax right and the prosecutor who wouldn't prosecute him was. This Kim Fox in Chicago, and so here is some Kim Vox. CanNot conflate peaceful protesters with what we saw last night. Last night was not an extension of a peaceful protests. Last night was not an extension of righteous anger. Last. Night was a blatant spray display. Of Criminal Behavior. What drove that behavior how we got there? Are Questions that we can continue to answer. But it is not the people for whom we've chosen not to use our resources to prosecute. The mothers who are mourning the loss is of their children the people who are afraid to go out into the stores into the streets, the people who are unable to come downtown today to go to work. Are Looking for answers. Not. Blame. Yeah looking for answers not blaming. So what she's saying is I don't want to prosecute anybody. I want answers to racial justice I. Don't want answers to the crime. Of course, this has led to. More and more crime because the criminals are just getting released. What's cheese Chicago Chevy violence now being experienced in several major cities including Chicago I'll research from a pro-police group is blaming local prosecutors and what they say is a declining conviction rate wgn investigates has an exclusive first look. At. This is Chicago. Every weekend teen killed in one every weekend painful holiday weekend. 00:15:02 - 00:20:04 There's no consequences. To legal gun possession. In our criminal justice system Chicago's new, and that's it right there. That's the new police chief. And he says there's no consequences to credit to gun possession in Chicago. There's no consequences to a lot of things in Chicago. There's no consequences to drug dealing. There's no consequences to all kinds of things in Chicago and so Kim Fox the prosecutor there again elected with George Soros money funded by put forward by everything about her was funded by George Soros and so now the police union is asking for her to resign. Public Room, Euch several police leaders in. Cook. County announced they have no confidence in Cook County State's attorney Kim Fox and they want her to resign. So the move follows the dismissal of charges in the Jussie smollet case however, at least one south suburban police chief disagrees with the move and this opposition goes beyond just the small case eyewitness news reporters here Sheltie is live right now with more on this call to resign today Sarah. Judy and rob the fraternal order of police and cook. County suburban police chief say that their frustration with Kim Fox started way before the Jussie smollet case, they accuse the state's attorney's Office of under prosecuting cases even not prosecuting cases even felony cases. We cannot stand for this any longer. Ms Facts needs to resign. And she should do it quickly. And so the cops are calling for her to resign and everybody wants to know what's going on in Chicago. WHY DO PEOPLE GETTING MURDERED IN CHICAGO? Well, apparently, there's no consequences for gun possession in Chicago and You know it is what it is. You can't change. What you can't change their the Nice woman who is the prosecutor isn't prosecuting the crimes. and. So I just got a message that the audio is a little buggy on guess that's up to the stream sometimes it's. You know it's interesting. I. The other day it was. Terrible on. On periscope and good on facebook and I guess today maybe a facebook as the one having trouble or maybe. All of them are regardless. The the idea here is we do the show live and it is what it is and we'll. All put it out on the podcast. Later, it'll be smooth as butter being recorded here in the idea was since I'm recording it anyway, we'll do it live and see how it works So Kim Fox they're calling for horror Resignation there in Chicago and so this is a good time for me to take a break and I will do that and see if I can't beef up the smoothness of the extreme as well at the same time. So be right back in just a minute or two and. You know how that works. So this is Brian I'll tell you the Republican podcast and I will be. Right, back Welcome back through public podcast and During the break I hopefully was able to clean up the livestream a little bit and. Hopefully, it's it's going to run a little bit better now for the program. Thank you for your patience. I think it was pilot error I want to blame the. Gerbils in the sky that make the Internet work but I think it was me. Song you know it is what it is. You know. Leaving the real world take responsibility, right you're grown up. So any welcome back to the Republican broadcasts with those who are new to the program So maybe I met the Lauren Culpa van last night handing out some business cards. Welcome. Thanks for joining us taking calls after the next break probably the eight six six. Nine eight eight eighty three eleven is the phone number if you WANNA call in be happy to have you and the Lauren culp rally last night was pretty cool deal and natural talk about that. Much on the show being were nationally focused show and that's a local election but that's the guy running for governor here in the state of Washington and pretty cool. So Now. Kim Fox there the prosecutor in Chicago basically decided that they don't want to use their Their public resources for prosecutions they don't think that's a good use of the resources that they think. It's a lot better to use them for I. Don't know whatever the famous thing was midnight basketball right now. In San Francisco. There was a guy supported again by George Soros. His name is Chesa Bodine. And chesser Benin is. The son? Of two of the weather underground bombers who are while his father is in federal prison. 00:20:04 - 00:25:01 His mother was in federal prison for years, and so this guy grew up with the idea that all jail is bad. And all incarceration is bad because his dad who was a criminal was incarcerated and so Chessel Benin is now the George. Soros Elected operated whatever guy? WHO's The San? Francisco. District Attorney Tonight San Francisco has a new district attorney chase a boo dean cave excise. Your Vasquez spoke to the new trump prosecutor about how he plans to take charge. The district attorney chase a bodine swore in the evening with the promise to reform San Francisco's justice system as I serve as district attorney district attorney, but the city and county of San Francisco or the city and county of San Francisco. Dean a former assistant public defender is now the top prosecutor. He says, there are too many people in jail over incarceration. He calls it and he says, one of his reforms will be decarbonisation. Join me join this movement join US rejecting the notion that to be free we must cage others. To do three months you other services. Quality of life issues such as carbon worries end open air drug abuse. I asked the incoming da whether justice system reforms could invite criminals who are not worried about legal consequence. Crimes these street level crimes like burglaries under your administration will they be prosecuted vigorously or will they feel emboldened as people are worried about I think we're going to have some very effective strategies to deter people from committing those crimes in San Francisco I, hope they don't commit them anywhere, but if they do not going to be in San Francisco on my watch I also asked Budeina about police shootings. Will he prosecute officers? I certainly hope not I don't look forward to filing criminal charges against anyone no matter who they are no matter what they do. It's difficult decision you. have to make just, knock. involving. and. Potentially in some cases, involving polices well, Houdini says its priorities will be bail reform sentencing reform and increased collaboration with public defenders. He says, he will soon be announcing strategies to deal with sexual assault as well as auto burglaries in San, Francisco Joe Vazquez KP and so you get to hear now. What the real motivation for Chesa Boudin is and he reveals it. This is actually a campaign commercial but you can hear in here when he talks about Carson. This is why this isn't based on kind of logic or common sense or experience or than anyone has seen this work anywhere. This is purely philosophical. Mass incarceration. It's a term that we hear almost daily. and. Yet what does it mean? To me, it meant going through prison gates. Every single time I wanted to see my parents. Since I was in diapers. To me it still means that as an adult. Because my father is serving a life sentence for crimes he committed when I was in diapers, my mother served twenty two years in prison. That's a reality that will never be lost on me. The implication is that somehow it's wrong for his father to be serving a life sentence for blowing people up. That's what his dad did. He was a weather underground terrorist. and His mom helped. and. They were will along with Bill Ayers Barack. Obama's buddy. They're in prison for billers isn't. A biller and his wife I believe in Nadine Dorn I think was And I don't know if Bill Ayers was ever prosecuted or not I regardless he continues. The reality though is not unique to me. It's not unique to the people I've represented or their families in my years. As a San, Francisco deputy public defender, it's an experience shared by the majority of Americans. The majority of Americans have an immediate family member who resided currently or formerly incarcerated is a defining feature of modern American culture. We need to end it now and we should start in San Francisco. That's And that's so that was his one of his campaign commercials is part about was what that was from and so. This Guy Chess Medine says that you know yes. Most people have a family member who has done jail time. I do. I do I have a family member? Who's done jail time? And you know it's not. 00:25:01 - 00:30:02 It's one of those that just is what it is right now I. I will tell you that this particular family member. Would tell you that He deserved the jail time. Okay, he would tell you that that the jail time was for crimes he committed. That, he wasn't a victim of the system when he went to jail, he was a victim miser. Of other people. And so I don't know what the problem is. Now, Philadelphia has a district attorney on named Larry Crasner. who an another one Name Rachel Rollins who's in a Massachusetts but. There is the one in Philadelphia and these guys are both funded by George Soros funded their campaigns and so here is Larry crafter. Welcome. I am Larry Crasner Philadelphia's district attorney. The most incarcerated country in the world is the United States Pennsylvania and Philadelphia has a terrible history of mass incarceration and excessive parole and probation. It's worse than many other parts of the United States. Incarceration tears apart society and it doesn't make us safe. It makes us broke. It takes resources from the things that prevent crime and make society whole like good public education, economic development health care, and treatment for children and families, and it shifts those resources to custody and supervision that costs a lot often more than fifty thousand dollars per person per year. Excessive. Parole and probation present. The same problem as excessive incarceration science shows that when parole and probation go on for too long they actually caused crime. While your taxes, just keep going up to pay that. Bill. Let's talk about how since the office in January two, thousand, eighteen, the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office has worked to reduce excessive jail and supervision. So we can shift those resources to achieve effective crime prevention just society. I heard, he says, they're excessive jail. And Supervision. We, we don't want to lock people up and then make sure that they you know and look after them there and we don't want to let them out and look after them. We don't want to look after him at all. We just WANNA have give him a little class and tell them you know Johnny, you have to stop being really bad now. And if you don't stop being really bad, you're GONNA have to come back and take to their class. I don't understand the idea that that we are incarcerating too many people and they start letting these people out and the city's turn to garbage, and this is the. Source Philosophy. Here's one more Larry Krassner. The stark difference between what's coming out of the president's mouth and what's happening on the streets in Philadelphia. We have not had anything that could be described as A. Burglaries criminal trespasses what some people would call looting. We haven't had anything like that. For weeks we have had. Peaceful protests on one hundred percent peaceful protests here for weeks. So when he's talking about taking over cities and he's talking about cities being out of control, he is lying. About the city Philadelphia which is nothing new. We have no regard for the truth. He has no regard for facts. If they all of the law then we'll all get along famously and if they choose not to follow the law, then they will discover that there are laws in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that can be used to prosecute them. So he's talking about cutting the federal government? But based on what I saw in. Portland is my opinion that some of that behavior looks. Like. Criminal Conduct. He's just wrong. Federal law enforcement officers are not above state law and they're not a federal I even though our president would like to present he's above the law none of them are above the law. That we have seen in Portland might provide a clue as to what could be coming. You know when you cause serious bodily injury fraction or fracturing someone's skull. And if that is done in a What in my opinion? is a manner that does not legally justified charged with aggravated Assault First Degree felony. You could be potentially charged with aggravated Assault second-degree felony. You might be charged with attempted murder depending upon all of the circumstances that apply. I'm just I'm just stating something pretty basic, which is when you wear a uniform you're supposed to come correct that made you follow the constitution you follow the laws. And we'RE NOT GONNA put up with. American. Law Enforcement Federal agencies behaving like they're Putin's private police. That's not. See now this is so silly. 00:30:03 - 00:35:08 They're like they're behaving like they're Putin's private police. It's just ridiculous. You. Know to to say that the as though Somehow Vladimir Putin is calling donald trump saying, hey, why don't you get a some guys out there on the street in Portland because they're burning down the courthouse and over here in Russia we think that's really bad. Or is it that if you were patriotic You would let them burn down the courthouse is that what he's saying that that would be the right thing to do. The, you know. Ted. Wheeler wasn't protecting it Governor Brown? Wasn't protecting you. So president trump went in and protected at since it's federal property. Not let him continue happening here. You know these are just words. It's typical is typical trump just words he said this is going to take over us any and then that takeover. Looks like what one hundred fifty guys showing up in military gear alarm quite clear with the streets are I mean is that really what we're talking about so allows really just fluffing nonsense I don't think we should. I actually don't think we should worry too much about it other than to worry about the the possibility that this is playing into some you know typical game of divide and conquer that I think will not serve him. So. Divide and conquer is exactly what the whole Soros Open Society thing is about they want to divide the people who have an by open society. What they mean let me translate is one world government. Okay and so. They WANNA have a one world government, and what that means is that you eliminate borders, you'll eight national distinctions at every level. Okay and so when he's talking about the idea of not serving his interest, that's because he thinks that nationalism is bad. And that if you're interested in nationalism that somehow you are a problematic. Person So. That is the kind of content had related to this stuff. I've got a few other things queued up or teed up. So let's immigration grab a break real quick, and when we get back from the break over the break, if you want to call in make some calls. That's great. If not, we can talk about what I saw in her last night at the Lauren culp rally and so on and so forth. So the phone number is eight, six, six, nine, hundred, eighty, three eleven. If you WANNA call in that great. The facebook Messenger Youtube twitter messing here, kind of things are open to so I will be back. Shortly and Occidental. Republican podcast. Money Brian O'Kelly. I will be your Ford the balance of program I guess all the all the time on. Picking up the people depend on it and I need a guest host. People do as they do the best of shows right and. When the thing gets big enough nobody wants best of and then people want to sit in for him. So I guess at something maybe someday. So. Not Talk to the a little bit about why or last night with. Rally and and just what I saw there along with. Things. Nobody. Called in over the break. So and I can't actually take a phone call while I'm doing this because Well, you know you might be nuts and I don't have a call screener. So probably grab another break before it's done and. Go from there anyway So last night I went out to the Rally for the guy who wants to be the governor in the state of Washington, and for those who don't know around the country, this guy came to prominence. About, two years ago we passed a law in Washington state that was a gun lawn I don't WanNa. Get in the weeds on what this law was but long story short it was a restrictive law that the gun control lobby loved and the gun rights lobby didn't love and it's Not yet been determined to be unconstitutional but I don't know if that's been challenged regardless Lauren culp was the share of over way over on the east side of the state for those of you who don't know Washington state. Most of the population is on the west coast. The eastern part of the state is mostly agricultural and when you get way east or by the Idaho border, it is very, very little populated and Oak Dogan County over there is where Lauren. Call was the sure of. Or is the sheriff still I believe and He said when this law passed I'm not GonNa enforce it in my county. It's on constitutional I'm not doing it. You can't make me I took an oath to preserve and protect the constitution, and you are asking me to act outside of it and I won't do it. And so that's how Lauren culprits to prominence, and then this year we had this This primary election process and normally. 00:35:08 - 00:40:06 In the primary election, it's a top to kind of a primary thing and. But because the COVID, we had thirty, seven, thirty, eight candidates I think for governor on the GOP ticket and Lauren Culpa rose the top and beat them all and so I've seen him now in person twice and man this guy gets the constitution. He said any bill that comes across my desk. The first question I'm going to ask is it constitutional because? I don't care how much I like it or don't like it. If it's not constitutional, we can't do it and it's not gonNA hold up in the end anyway and What I've seen at these rallies now, a couple times is first of all. There's just a ton of people. There's a lot of energy on the right in this very, very blue state. There's a lot of red energy, which is the first time I've seen it really even when trump ran. Came and did a rally. There are a lot of people went to that trump rally but there was not enthusiasm for anybody on the gubernatorial side. Like this, this is very, very different than what we've seen here. Now, the the second the I noticed is that there were just a ton of people I mean literally like get a ton. Of People. Open carrying. Just, a lot of guys walk around with their hips and I'm not here to say that's good or bad, but I'll tell you what? If you're the person who wanted to come in and shoot that place. You weren't going to get a chance you're GONNA get one or two shots Hav, and you're going to be all done. There was just I mean first of all is a lot of law enforcement because Lauren call a police officer, right. But then also just people were comfortable open carrying in that environment. Another thing. I. Saw that was interesting is just a ton of not had masks on I couldn't say nobody but. Very few people have masks on I did see one Cunanan on great awakening shirt just one shirt like that, and so that was. Interesting. Now, the thing that I can share and is kind of an. I don't know how to say it's not really off the record. It's not a super big secret but. Let's just say that that our military has some unbelievable crowd control. Abilities okay these. Are Bases in the Middle East are. Very often surrounded by hostile crowds and that's just nothing new. It's been going for a long time. And not just in the middle. East. But other places to what America does unpopular things are basis get kind of surrounded by folks and. So we have some really effective crowd control. Methods and technology that we employ and when these things were happening in Seattle and I know some of these things have been happening in Portland. It's it's absolutely the One. Prosecutor there crowder from Philadelphia and the guys can't tell the difference between the street and the federal property. He's right on the street. The military can't operate posse. COMITATUS. Prevents that. But there's nothing that says that they can't give logistical support the people who are operating on the street. And this is really important. You know the the the COPs can't the military can't arrest you. But nothing says that the military camp provide intelligence or surveillance? Capabilities to the police that they arrest you with. As long as we're not violating the constitution. So those surveillance things would have a warrant and so on. But outdoor surveillance surveillance crowd doesn't require warrants, right. So the ability of pick out one voice from the crowd and identify who it is and identify one actor and some of those kind of things that the military has for capabilities but just say this. I, know I know now I had suspected but I now know that those capabilities have been brought to bear in some of these situations. What that means is there are a couple of big shifts here. That are very important and one is that the local police are not just on their own anymore. They are effectively every police agency that wants to. Has All of the women or all of the technology and support of the US military available them all they have to ask the president is making it available to them. So. PORTLAND. House a prosecutor Mike Schmidt. Came in down there and he was the George Soros back candidate, and so the police have come in there and. 00:40:06 - 00:45:14 The state police were coming in there and arresting people and they weren't getting prosecuted because of Mike Schmidt and so the state police pulled out of Portland. and. Said we'RE NOT GONNA. Waste our resources here if these guys aren't GonNa Bother, going to bother to prosecute them. Well the federal government said we will. They raise their hand will will prosecute them. We'll go ahead. We'll put them in jail. And so they're not getting charged with these local ordinances they're getting charged with federal crimes, and so the difference here is if they had been charged by Mike, Schmidt who wanted to keep them out of jail. do you want to go to jail? They would have been subject to a one year or two year local state of Oregon incarceration. But because Mike Schmidt decided not to prosecute. They're going to be prosecuted under federal law. which is going to put them in jail for somewhere between ten and forty years. And as this has ramped up, the complaints on the part of the left has been while you're trying to intimidate. People. Yes. That's the idea they're trying to intimidate people into not protesting or at least not into not protesting into not being violent when they do. So shifting gears, we'll come back I'm gonNA, take a break real quick actually I want shifting years old just said over to. The next thing John MacArthur is the pastor in Los Angeles of Grace Community Church and he has been fighting this ongoing battle with the county about opening up and having church services so they brought him into. The church and he brought people into the church, he said welcome to our protest. and. Then, the city got mad about that and has a snapped the lease on their parking lot and John. Macarthur now says, your have put me in jail and they're threatening that and he says, bring it on the angles been telling you for months. Blue states are using Cohen restrictions as a cover to launch an all out assault on your inalienable rights like you're right to religious liberty. Now. The tyrants in California are still pretty giving people for worshiping indoors all by executive. Fiat. But one pastor, he's fighting back to find a court order against enor- services and that man is pastor John Macarthur, and this is from the sermon. He gave to a packed hall of worshippers last Sunday. A. Pastor John. Macarthur of Grace Community Church joins me now macarthur why is this important for you to stand up to these owners edicts? Well. We believe that the Governor County, the city in the health department or going against the Constitution and just to remove one obvious question rate of Kobe in California is one one hundredth of one percent. So one one, hundred of one percent of forty million people have covid an ad eliminates freedom to worship from the entire state, the other ninety, nine point, nine percent right? The constitution supports s him by the way I am so thankful that president trump as told me personally that he supports church as essential and the churches need to stay open. So the Constitution on our side and the president's backing we're open. Pastor MacArthur Kamala Harris thanks we're in essentially rolled war to listen. This is not about punishment. It's about big brother is simply about saying a leader. What a leader says in times of crisis, and this is you can look at World War Two you look at the Great Depression where leader said. We each have to sacrifice for the sake of the nation and the collective and Mansa. This is about Half a million Americans die turn. World. War trying to free Europe. The same. To what you now to somehow justify depriving people of their inalienable rights to assemble to petition the government and of course, to worship as a community. Well of course, but it's more than that Laura. The Church Preaches the gospel of Jesus Christ Jesus died and rose again and the only source of eternal salvation when the church doesn't exist make sure it navigates around politicians whims the church exists in the world preached the Saving Gospel of Christ or not concerned about the flu we're working CERNA about eternity eternal life salvation, and the more dire circumstances become in the world around us the more critical. 00:45:14 - 00:49:48 The more essential the church becomes and the more important. The Gospel becomes I'll tell you something our church is literally flooded with people. We have them in every nook and cranny jammed together inside outside on several floors in our children's education building in the gym in a tent outside their flooding the place hear the message of forgiveness and salvation in a time when feared is being propagated on every. As. I listen to Selma. And the you know there's an old saying that says, in the time when all the world is a liar, people will flock to manny tells the truth. And that's John. Macarthur right now and he's telling the truth it's unconstitutional. It's illegal to restrict my movement. You can't quarantine me when I'm healthy. You can quarantine me when I'm sick or you have a reasonable suspicion that I'm sick. And so the. Contrast couldn't be more stark between the two sides in this debate or the two sides. In the discussion we've got the Joe. Biden. Side that wants to put literally everybody in a mask and make it the law that you don't have a choice and down to probably arresting you who knows here is Biden's pitch for a mask mandate by his own admission. He continued to lie about covert nineteen double down on the catastrophic mistakes that he's made, and perhaps worst of all made clear that he still doesn't have a plan. To bring us out of this crisis even said I quote. A lot of people think that masks are not good. Undercutting easiest most effective means we have reducing the spread of this disease I would call all the governors to the White House. And say because there's a question I think it's an can be answered in the positive a question whether I can mandate. Over state lines in every single state has to comply. Now our legal team thinks I can do that based upon the degree to which there's a crisis in those states and how bad things are for the country and if we don't do it what happens. But I would make the case. I'd make the case why it's necessary. Have the scientists to rate lay out in detail why and I would go to every governor and I go to governor's related Republican and Democratic Governors nine say we have to have this national manding we must do it. So. How does that make sense? How does it make sense that we have a national mask mandate? You know when when you have a state like you know Montana or no North Dakota or how how about this does it make sense to have a national mandate that includes Alaska? How about Guam what about Puerto Rico? How about these islands? They have the same breakout issues or infection issues everywhere else. To treat, New York City. And New Jersey and Los Angeles. The same is Cheyenne Wyoming. Or Chattanooga. Tennessee or. Panama City Florida just thinking about where some friends live you know or who knows you know a million other small towns. You know. Green Bay. Wisconsin. Is Not, Los Angeles, and the idea of treating all of these like a monolith is you know the old saying goes liberals don't care what what you do as long as it's mandatory. You know they just WanNa make sure that everybody is always being treated the same and they want equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity and such a big important difference in the philosophical difference between the parties. So thanks for joining. I'm going to wrap it up here and will head off to the weekend and yet the podcast out. So later today those who. were. Finding the audio dropping out in the early part of the show that'll be rectified on the podcast. Thanks again for your time and attention. If you can find the time to visit the website at Republican or dot Com and sponsor the show ID grateful for that. Or just go to patriots dot com slash record keeper and remember for me share the show and abuse Horton show financially. If it makes sense to give. Thanks.  

The film Goodfellas introduced us to the real Henry Hill. What does desistance from crime look like for someone on an organized crime trajectory?  How difficult is it to break from that entrenched gangster identity and mafia family belonging? This episode tackles those questions and more! #desistance      Criminogenic Needs Explained, from The Criminologist Channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=filtuNCRqvg&t=68s Desistance from Crime, Chapter One, from The Criminologist Channel:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff8toV749wk&t=18s The Psychology of Criminal Conduct:  https://www.amazon.com/Psychology-Criminal-Conduct-James-Bonta/dp/1138935778  

First, it sounds like the Florida Bar might be listening to this podcast.  (Jut kidding, of course.)  It issued a proposed advisory opinion allowing out of state lawyers to practice remotely from Florida without UPL repercussions.  Read more about solving the "butt in seat" problem here. Second, applicants to the bar who have any criminal history at all are faced with lots of wrinkles in disclosing their conduct to moral character committees.  Megan runs through some scenarios displaying this complexity and gives some guidance on how to handle them.  Thanks for listening! Don’t forget to SUBSCRIBE to the show to receive every new episode delivered straight to your podcast player every Tuesday. If you enjoyed this episode, please help me get the word out about this podcast. Rate and Review this show in Apple Podcasts, Stitcher Radio, Google Play, and Tunein and be sure to share this podcast with a friend. Be sure to connect with me and reach out with any questions or recommendations for specific resources: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Website Email me at megan[at]zaviehlaw[dot]com This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not to be construed as legal advice specific to your circumstances. If you need help with any legal matters, be sure to consult with an attorney regarding your specific needs.

In this episode, Jen chats with the co-hosts of Criminal Conduct. Check out Criminal Conduct here: http://criminalconduct.net/ Also, be sure to check out Javier's show, Pretend at http://pretendradio.org/ and John's show, Twisted at http://www.twistedpodcast.com/. MORE FROM THE TECHNOFUNKBOY: http://technofunkboy.com (http://technofunkboy.com/) MORE FROM DESDYMONA HOWARD: https://desdymona.com (https://desdymona.com/?fbclid=IwAR0H073_7OawFhOZFncFDRrh76F54TsGaP_F6--s8usu7MYzGbBD0eA90iE)

What do you get when two individual true crime podcasters with unique but complimentary skillsets team up to create one together? A fantastic podcast and a great interview on DIE-ALOGUE. Javier Leiva and John Taylor each have their own successful podcasts. PRETEND Radio and Twisted, respectfully. They collaborated to tell the story of the mysterious death of Michelle O'Connel, and the murder of Eli Washtock. If that's confusing at all, start listening to their show, Criminal Conduct, now. Wait, first listen to them share their creative process, behind the scenes investigation stories, and how their interest in the darker side of things first started for both of them. There's just a couple episodes left of Criminal Conduct, so go enjoy the binge, and join us for a follow up GetVokl conversation Thursday night, May 28 at 7pm Eastern.  Follow Criminal Conduct on Instagram + Twitter:  Find Javier's podcast, PRETEND, here. Listen to John's podcast, Twisted, here. Thank you, Javier + John, for killing the small talk! DIE-ALOGUE is a Yellow Tape Inc. Production. Hosted by Rebekah Sebastian. Edited by Chris Gersbeck. Original theme music by Olivia Himes. Don't forget we are on Twitter, Instagram + FB: @diealoguepod Use the hashtag #diealoguepod on social media! If you enjoy DIE-ALOGUE, please consider leaving a five start rating and review wherever you listen!  KILL THE SMALL TALK. START A DIE-ALOGUE. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/diealoguepod/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/diealoguepod/support

COVID-19 Scams I wasn’t expecting to be back with a new PRETEND episode so soon. In fact, I’m still wrapping up the final episodes for my new show called CRIMINAL CONDUCT. But the world around us has changed. And scammers are on the prowl.  If you live in the US, chances are you probably received your stimulus payment. It went either straight into your bank account through direct deposit. Or some of you may have cashed the check that you received in the mail.  We’re talking about much-needed money for tens of millions of Americans out of work due to the Coronavirus. $1,200 for individuals and $3,400 for a family of four.  The IRS has sent out 150 million payments so far since the time of this recording… but more payments are still expected to still arrive through the end of June.  And if you haven’t received your check, you’re probably wondering what’s the hold-up? Unfortunately for some, your money is probably gone and in the hands of thieves.  Today, I’m going to show you exactly how easy it is for scammers to steal your money. In fact, I’ve challenged a privacy expert to try and hack into my private information. I was really shocked at what he was able to find. Resources: Password managers 1Passowrd.com (User-friendly and secure) Bitwarden (More secure cloud-based password manager) KeePassXC (More secure computer-based password manager)  Search to see if you’re password is exposed in a breached database https://haveibeenpwned.com/ Credit freezes Credit Freeze Tutorial (Full Workbook)  Annual Credit Report (Free credit report to detect fraud) Enable 2-factor authentication on all platforms that support it https://twofactorauth.org/ Online removal workbook https://inteltechniques.com/data/workbook.pdf Additional resources Michael Bazzell’s website Intel Techniques Eva Velasquez Identity Theft Resource Center Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Just before Christmas 1979, 23 year old Phyllis Murphy disappeared while waiting on a bus in Newbridge, Co Kildare. Her body was found in an isolated spot 25 miles away at Turlough Hill, Co Wicklow a month later.  After a huge search and investigation, the gardai had no leads as to who was responsible for her death.But in 1998, DNA in Phyllis' case was tested as part of Operation Trace. As a result of that, 53 year old John Crerar - a neighbour of Phyllis' remaining family - stood trial at the Dublin Central Criminal Court. ********** Thanks to our sponsors for today’s episode: Help take control of your debt with payoff.com/MensRea (http://payoff.com/mensrea) Get 3 months of fast and secure Virtual Private network at expressVPN.com/mens (http://expressvpn.com/mens) ********** Don't forget to check out out featured podcast this week - Criminal Conduct (http://criminalconduct.net/) ! Javier and John have put together a riveting story, not only looking into the mysterious death of 24 year old Michelle O'Connell, but also the man who was investigating her death. Find it here (https://podcasts.apple.com/ie/podcast/criminal-conduct/id1496833335) ********** Find us on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/mensreapod/) or Twitter (https://twitter.com/MensReaPod) ! With thanks to our supporters on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/MensReaPod) ! Donate today to get access to bonus and ad-free episodes! Check out the Mens Rea Merch Store (https://shop.spreadshirt.ie/MensReaPod/) !  ********** Theme Music: Quinn’s Song: The Dance Begins Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com (http://incompetech.com/) ) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Additional Music:   Allemande (Sting) by Wahneta Meixsell. Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/********** (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Sources:  “Missing girl search” in The Irish Times (29 December 1979) p 5.  “Search for woman to continue today” in The Irish Times (31 December 1979) p. 5.  "Murder theory in search for woman” in The Irish Times (1 January 1980) p. 5.  “No progress in hunt for missing girl” in The Irish Times (3 January 1980) p. 6. Willy Clingan,  “Hopes fade for missing woman” in The Irish Times (7 January 1980) p. 11.  “Search for missing woman” in The Irish Times (8 January 1980) p. 11.  “Gardai intensify Kildare search” in The Irish Times (10 January 1980) p. 6.  “Body of missing woman found” in The Irish Times (19 January 1980) p. 1.  “Woman found in mountains” in The Belfast Telegraph (18 January 1980) p. 4.  “2000 at Kildare girl's funeral” in The Irish Times (21 January 1980) p. 11  “Gardai in murder hunt investigate complaint” in The Irish Times (22 January 1980) p. 6.  “Murder inquiry: gardai seek car” in The Irish Times (28 January 1980) p. 6.  “Kildare girl's clothes found” in The Irish Times (30 January 1980) p. 6.  “Gardai step up murder inquiry” in The Irish Times (4 December 1980) p. 1.  “Man helps in murder inquiry” in The Irish Times (6 January 1981) p. 5.  “Kildare murder progress” in The Irish Times (8 January 1981) p. 7.  Stephen Rae and Micahel Lavery, “What Phyllis first victim?” in The Evening Herald (24 September 1998) p.p. 1,6.  Jim Cusack, “File on missing women are reopened” in The Irish Times (23 September 1998) p. x.  Senan Moloney, “Fear Stalks” in The Evening Herald (25 September 1998) p. 4.  George Jacob, “Warm welcome greets formation of new Garda investigation team” in The Bray People (8 October 1998) p. 13.  Stephen Rae, “Gardai begin probe into women 'serial killer' link” in The Irish Independent (31 October 1998) p.10  Jim Cusack and Roisin Ingle, “ Ex-soldier charged with murder” in The Irish Times (14 July 1999) p. 1.  Roisin Ingle, “Man to appear in Naas court today on murder charge” in The Irish Times (14 July 1999) p. 3.  Jim Cusack, “Phyllis Murphy last seen waiting to catch a bus” in The Irish Times (14 July 1999) p. 3.  Colman Cassidy, “Family relieved at news of arrest” in The Irish Times (14 July 1999) p. 3.  Nuala Haughey, “Man on murder charge due in court again today” in The Irish Times (15 July 1999) p. 3.  “Man on trial for murder of woman 22 years ago” in The Irish Times (9 October 2002) p. 4.  “Accused said he had never spoken to Phyllis Murphy” in The Irish Times (10 October 2002) p. 3.  “Injuries consistent with rape, murder trial is told” in The Irish Times (11 October 2002) p. 4.  “Blood samples 'held for 17 years'” in The Irish Times (18 October 2002) p. 4.  “Murder trial told DNA tests carried out 20 years after death” in The Irish Times (19 October 2002) p. 4.  “Murder trial told DNA sample matched accused” in The Irish Times (22 October 2002) p. 4.  “Security guard admits he lied about alibi for murder accused” in The Irish Times (24 October 2002) p. 4.  “Murder trial told accused washed out boot of car” in The Irish Times (25 October 2002) p. 4.  “DNA match impossible says murder case accused” in The Irish Times (30 November 2002) p. 4.  “Jury in Crerar murder trial resumes its deliberations today” in The Irish Times (31 October 2002) p. 4.  “Former soldier sentenced to life for murder of Kildare woman” in The Irish Times (1 November 2002) p. 4.  Alison Healey, “Death of a Christmas shopper in the woods” in The Irish Times (1 November 2002) p. 4.  Stephen Rae, “Breakthrough” in The Evening Herald (13 July 1999) p. 1, 3.  Michael Mulqueen, “Murder accused weeps in court” in The Evening Herald (14 July 1999) p.1, 3.  Tom Brady, “Murder suspect heckled outside court” in The Irish Independent (15 July 1999) p. 3.  “Accused also claiming deafness compensation” in The Irish Independent (15 July 1999) p. 3.  Paul Williams, “My 20-year hell as Phyllis suspect” in The Sunday World (18 July 1999) p. 8 Geraldine Niland, “Nightmare of not knowing” in The Sunday Independent (18 July 1999) p. 11.  “Army claim adjourned” in The Irish Independent (20 July 1999) p. 4.  “Murphy murder accused gets bail” in The Irish Independent (27 July 1999) p. 4.  Rita O'Reilly, “After 22 years, ex soldier goes on trial for murder” in The Irish Independent (9 October 2002) p.4  Kathy Donaghy, “Slightly built father-of-five barely audible as he enters innocent plea” in The Irish Independent (9 October 2002) p.4  Rita O'Reilly, “I was looking into the trees when I saw a body, retired garda tells court,” in The Irish Independent (9 October 2002) p.4  “The last time I saw Phyllis” in The Evening Herald (9 October 2002) p.p. 1, 18.  Charles Mallow, “Phyllis fought to the death” in The Evening Herald (10 October 2002) p.p. 1,6.  Rita O'Reilly, “DNA was not mine says man in 1979 murder trial” in The Irish Independent (30 October 2002) p. 8.  Helen Bruce, “'Reluctant' Crerar gives barely audible defence” in The Irish Independent (30 October 2002) p. 8.  Rita O'Reilly, “23 years on, Phyllis's killer is guilty” in The Irish Independent (1 November 2002) p. 9.  Kathy Donaghy, “How Christmas shopping trip ended in horror” in The Irish Independent (1 November 2002) p. 9.  Charlie Mallon “Man who would not let the case die” in The Evening Herald (1 November 2002) p. 4. Rita O'Reilly, “The master of concealment ran out of places to hide” in The Sunday Independent (3 November 2002) p. 9.  Stephen Rae, “Crerar: more sex attacks are revealed” in The Evening Herald (4 November 2002) p. 1.  Melanie Finn, “Crerar trial anguish of murder victim's family” in The Evening Herald (5 November 2002) p. 11.  Rita O'Reilly, “Phyllis Murphy killer accused of child sex abuse” in The Sunday Independent (10 November 2002) p. 6.  Stephen McNeice, “We're not going to let bitterness get us” - sister of murdered Phyllis Murphy” from Newstalk.com https://www.newstalk.com/news/not-going-let-bitterness-get-us-sister-murdered-phyllis-murphy-2-941861 (22 December 2019)

Journalist /podcast host Javier Leiva (Pretend Radio and Criminal Conduct) worked alongside future murderer Vester Lee Flanagan II (aka Bryce Williams) at CBS affiliate WDBJ in Roanoke, Virginia. They lost contact, but Javier vividly remembers the morning Vester opened fire on two colleagues (Alison Parker and Adam Ward) on live television, August 26, 2015. This explicit, public tragedy even caught the attention of President Obama. Javier looks back on the hours spent with Vester and wonders what could have prevented the ambush, what signs were missed, and how this tragedy reinforced Javier's awareness that life is fragile.

Javier Leiva is the producer and host of the Criminal Conduct and Pretend Podcasts, and he is an absolute master of storytelling. Today he comes on the Earfluence Podcast to share tips on how you can be a better storyteller in podcasts - what you can learn from watching reality TV and documentaries like Tiger King, what podcasts you should be listening to to learn, interviewing tricks and what he's learned from his co-host, and how to create a storytelling arc. If you're a podcaster, you won't want to miss this!The Earfluence Podcast is a production of Earfluence and hosted by Jason Gillikin.

Tim Pilleri and Lance Reenstierna chat with fellow Private Investigations For the Missing board member Michelle Kaszuba to discuss her work as a prosecutor. We discuss depraved heart murders and no body cases like Maura Murray and Alissa Turney! Follow Michelle on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MKazColdCase Check out our entire network of shows: http://crawlspace-media.com/ Follow Private Investigations For the Missing https://investigationsforthemissing.org/ https://twitter.com/PIFortheMissing https://www.facebook.com/PIFortheMissing/ https://www.instagram.com/investigationsforthemissing/ Follow Missing Maura Murray's social media pages: https://twitter.com/MauraMurrayDoc, instagram.com/missingmauramurray, facebook.com/mauramurraydoc Check out Crawlspace's Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/crawlspacepodcast Follow Crawlspace Twitter: https://twitter.com/CrawlspacePod IG: https://www.instagram.com/crawlspacepodcast/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/Crawlspacepodcast/ Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crawlspace-true-crime-mysteries/id1187326340 Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/crawlspace Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/58cll3enTW2SNmbJUuLsrt Check out Criminal Conduct: http://criminalconduct.net/ "Keep Coming Back” is a series of one-on-one interviews focused around the paths to sobriety and recovery. Each episode explores an individual’s unique story, their relationship with drugs and alcohol, and explains how each navigates life today without a drink, a powder, or a pill. Find the podcast here; http://keepcomingbackpodcast.com/ Music for Missing Maura Murray is produced by Kevin MacLeod and David Williams. Please contact the Murray family directly at mauramurrayfamilydirect@gmail.com or the New Hampshire State Police for any leads in their ongoing investigation. Telephone: (603) 223-3860 or (800) NAB-DOPE, Email: ColdCaseUnit@DOS.NH.GOV. Or Crime Stoppers: 1-800-222-TIPS

In September 2010, 24-year-old Michelle O’Connell was found dead in her home in St. Augustine, Florida just minutes after breaking up with her boyfriend, St. Johns County Sheriff Deputy Jeremy Banks. Just over eight years later, in January 2019, Eli Washtock, an amateur investigator looking into the O’Connell case, was found dead in his condo. Criminal Conduct is a brand new true-crime podcast hosted by John Taylor and Javier Leiva that investigates these two interlinked murders. The ten-episode, weekly series looks into new evidence and perspectives from O’Connell’s murder, tying her death into the Washtock case. A New Collaboration from Two Podcast Pros John hosts a true crime podcast called Twisted. He brings deep criminal justice experience to the podcast as a practicing private investigator and former Secret Service agent. Javier is the producer of Pretend Radio, a documentary-style podcast that tells stories of people pretending to be someone else. John and Javier first connected about three years ago at a podcast meetup in their home state of North Carolina. They remained in contact since then, looking for an opportunity to do a collaboration podcast. Several months ago, they agreed that the O’Connell/Washtock story was a great case for the first season of their new podcast series, Criminal Conduct. Case #1: Michelle O’Connell Minutes after breaking up with St. Johns County Sheriff Deputy Jeremy Banks, Michelle O’Connell was dead in her home. Soon after, Jeremey called 911, claiming he found her lying on her floor with a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head. The St. Johns County Sheriff investigators ruled her death a suicide.  John and Javier look into the Sheriff’s Office’s handling of the case, noting several mistakes in an overall lackluster (and likely biased) investigation. They also take a deeper look into Jeremey, whose 911 call and overall demeanor during the episode raises major red flags. Case #2: Eli Washtock Just over eight years later, Eli Washtock was found dead in his St. Augustine condo. Eli was an amatuer sleuth conducting his own independent investgiation into the O’Connell murder. He was said to have found “bombshell” evidence against Jeremy right before his death, which is still under investigation by the neighboring Putnam County Sheriff’s Office.  John and Javier find Eli to be a fascinating character. He was a loner, with very little social media presence. He never knew Michelle O’Connell, but was so enthralled by the case that he befriended Michelle’s mom, Patty O’Connell, over the course of his investigation. He was also a car mechanic who owned two expensive condos that seemed to be out of his price range. Throughout the series, Javier and John dig deeper into Eli’s past to understand his motivations and secrets. The Inaugural Ten-Episode Season of Criminal Conduct The first season of Criminal Conduct explores the O’Connell and Washtock cases, with the hope of reinvigorating interest into the mysteries surrounding their deaths. Perhaps the podcast can even help lead to a resolution of the cases. The ten-episode season of Criminal Conduct debuted on March 23, 2020 with new episodes published weekly. Start listening today! You can catch up on all of the Payne in the Pod episodes, here. Become a patron to receive even more exclusive content from Mary Payne including in-depth conversations that you won’t find anywhere else! John and Javier’s Podcast Recommendations: Re-Sound Case of the Missing Hit Mugshot Swindled In the Dark (Season 2) Serial (Season 1) The Shrink Next Door Find Criminal Conduct at: Criminalconduct.net Twitter: @criminalcon Instagram: @criminalcon Facebook: Criminal Conduct Podcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to Crawlspace. In this episode Tim Pilleri and Lance Reenstierna chat with John Taylor and Javier Leiva about their new podcast investigating the death of Michelle O'Connell and murder of Eli Washtock. Criminal Conduct is an investigative true-crime podcast series hosted by John Taylor and Javier Leiva. In season 1, the hosts look into the death of Michelle O'Connell, picking up the investigation where murdered sleuth, Eli Washtock, left off. Follow Criminal Conduct on social media: https://www.instagram.com/criminalcon/, https://twitter.com/criminalcon Check out the Criminal Conduct site: http://criminalconduct.net/ Check out our site at http://crawlspace-media.com/ Sign up for our Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/crawlspacepodcast. Five bucks a month gets you access to new content every week. Check out the new Crawlspace Discussion Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/talkcrawlspace/ Check out our entire network at http://crawlspace-media.com/ Go to https://smile.amazon.com/ to connect your existing Amazon account to donate to PI's For the Missing. Check out Private Investigations For the Missing: https://investigationsforthemissing.org/ Download Best Fiends for free now! https://download.bestfiends.com/ Check out My Passion Case from Slo Burn Media: https://sloburnmedia.com/ Follow Missing Maura Murray: Twitter: https://twitter.com/MauraMurrayDoc FB: https://www.facebook.com/MauraMurrayDoc/ IG: https://www.instagram.com/missingmauramurray/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/MissingMauraMurray Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/missing-maura-murray/id1006974447 Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/missing-maura-murray Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0yRXkJrZC85otfT7oXMcri --- This episode is sponsored by · The Colin and Samir Podcast: The Colin and Samir Podcast hosted by LA - based friends and filmmakers Colin and Samir takes a look into what it’s like to make creativity your career. https://open.spotify.com/show/5QaSbbv2eD4SFrlFR6IyY7?si=Dj3roVoJTZmOime94xhjng

We are super excited to tell you about an awesome new podcast from our friends award-winning journalist and fellow podcaster, Javier Leiva, and host of Twisted Podcast, John Taylor. Season one is an intense investigation around the mysterious death of Michelle O'Connell in St. Augustine, Florida. Trust us, this podcast is a must listen for any true-crime fan addict out there.You can check out the show and subscribe using the links below:Apple Podcasts https://apple.co/2S4KaoGGoogle Play http://bit.ly/CriminalConGoogleStitcher http://bit.ly/CriminalConStitcherSpotify https://spoti.fi/2S00wz7Support the show (https://talkmurder.com/join/)

Tim Pilleri and Lance Reenstierna chat with fellow Private Investigations For the Missing board member Michelle Kaszuba to discuss her work as a prosecutor in the state of New York. We discuss several of the cases Michelle has worked on over the years and much more! Follow Michelle on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MKazColdCase Check out our entire network of shows: http://crawlspace-media.com/ Follow Private Investigations For the Missing https://investigationsforthemissing.org/ https://twitter.com/PIFortheMissing https://www.facebook.com/PIFortheMissing/ https://www.instagram.com/investigationsforthemissing/ Follow Missing Maura Murray's social media pages: https://twitter.com/MauraMurrayDoc, instagram.com/missingmauramurray, facebook.com/mauramurraydoc Check out Crawlspace's Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/crawlspacepodcast Follow Crawlspace Twitter: https://twitter.com/CrawlspacePod IG: https://www.instagram.com/crawlspacepodcast/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/Crawlspacepodcast/ Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crawlspace-true-crime-mysteries/id1187326340 Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/crawlspace Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/58cll3enTW2SNmbJUuLsrt Check out Criminal Conduct: http://criminalconduct.net/ "Keep Coming Back” is a series of one-on-one interviews focused around the paths to sobriety and recovery. Each episode explores an individual’s unique story, their relationship with drugs and alcohol, and explains how each navigates life today without a drink, a powder, or a pill. Find the podcast here; http://keepcomingbackpodcast.com/ Music for Missing Maura Murray is produced by Kevin MacLeod and David Williams. Please contact the Murray family directly at mauramurrayfamilydirect@gmail.com or the New Hampshire State Police for any leads in their ongoing investigation. Telephone: (603) 223-3860 or (800) NAB-DOPE, Email: ColdCaseUnit@DOS.NH.GOV. Or Crime Stoppers: 1-800-222-TIPS

Welcome to Crawlspace. In this episode Tim Pilleri and Lance Reenstierna chat with author and retired Seattle Police homicide detective Cloyd Steiger about his new book - Seattle's Forgotten Serial Killer: Gary Gene Grant. Follow Cloyd on social media: https://twitter.com/shamus4313, https://www.facebook.com/cloydsteigerauthor/ Check out Cloyd's book: https://www.amazon.com/Seattles-Forgotten-Serial-Killer-Grant/dp/1467143626 Check out Cloyd's site: www.cloydsteiger.com Check out our site at http://crawlspace-media.com/ Sign up for our Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/crawlspacepodcast. Five bucks a month gets you access to new content every week. Check out the new Crawlspace Discussion Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/talkcrawlspace/ Check out our entire network at http://crawlspace-media.com/ Go to https://smile.amazon.com/ to connect your existing Amazon account to donate to PI's For the Missing. Check out Private Investigations For the Missing: https://investigationsforthemissing.org/ Follow Missing Maura Murray: Twitter: https://twitter.com/MauraMurrayDoc FB: https://www.facebook.com/MauraMurrayDoc/ IG: https://www.instagram.com/missingmauramurray/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/MissingMauraMurray Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/missing-maura-murray/id1006974447 Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/missing-maura-murray Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0yRXkJrZC85otfT7oXMcri Check out Criminal Conduct: http://criminalconduct.net/ Sign up for Better Help at Betterhelp.com/Crawlspace --- This episode is sponsored by · The Colin and Samir Podcast: The Colin and Samir Podcast hosted by LA - based friends and filmmakers Colin and Samir takes a look into what it’s like to make creativity your career. https://open.spotify.com/show/5QaSbbv2eD4SFrlFR6IyY7?si=Dj3roVoJTZmOime94xhjng

This week we are discussing the story of a well-known attorney in Nevada and how was murdered at the hands of a lifelong con artist. ***Live Show Update*** The show scheduled at City Winery in Chicago on March 27, 2020 will be rescheduled to a later date. . If you have purchased your tickets, you will be receiving an email from City Winery in the next few days. We are so sad we aren’t able to make it due to COVID-19, but can’t wait to reschedule as soon as possible! Thank you to Haley Gray with HaleyGrayResearch.com with your help on the episode! Make sure you check out the trailer at the end of the episode for Criminal Conduct http://criminalconduct.net/ Thank you to this week’s sponsors! Right now Lamps Plus is offering up to 50% off HUNDREDS of lights, furniture and décor during the biggest sale of the season from NOW until MARCH 30TH. Just go to lampsplus.com/MOMS.  For 10 free meals including free shipping, go to HelloFresh.com/momsandmurder10 and use code momsandmurder10.  Check out all the amazing shoes and bags available right now at Rothys.com/MOMS We are happy to bring Better Help to our listeners. Visit Betterhelp.com/Moms and use promo code MOMs for 10% off your first month.   If you have a hero in your life you’d like to nominate, email us at LastThingBeforeWeGo@gmail.com and put “Hero” as the subject. If you’d like to support The Mom’s and get some fun perks, including bonus episodes and early release- ad free episodes, you can check out our Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/momsandmurderpodcast. As always, you can find us on Twitter, Instagram, and on our website at https://momsandmurder.com. Make sure you subscribe and rate our show to help others find us! We updated our merch store, you can find that at momsandmurder.threadless.com!  Connect with us on social media at:Facebook.com/MomsAndRedRumInstagram: @MomsAndMurderTwitter.com/MomsAndMurder Sources: https://www.oxygen.com/crime-time/Laren-Aims-Jordan-Murdered-Husband-Larry-McNabney-With-Horse-Tranquilizers  https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Wife-s-bizarre-confession-in-poisoning-2861614.php https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=132629&page=1 https://www.lodinews.com/article_c1d5e09d-407f-5eaa-a48b-9ec12a0e210c.html https://www.newspapers.com/image/150777636/?article=20601058-71e3-4124-a3c4-87a897d39be9&focus=0.65232843,0.4357495,0.9723569,0.74825805&xid=2378 https://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?dbid=1100&h=8200950&indiv=try&o_vc=Record:OtherRecord&rhSource=61843 https://casetext.com/case/dutra-v-lattimore?q=sarah%20dutra&p=1&tab=keyword&jxs=&sort=relevance&type=case https://casetext.com/case/people-v-dutra?q=sarah%20dutra&p=1&tab=keyword&jxs=&sort=relevance&type=case https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-01-22-mn-1269-story.html https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F3/010/10.F3d.1374.89-10464.89-10469.89-10567.89-10459.89-10456.html https://apnews.com/515a772f8d6a21265108665e4940fefb https://www.recordnet.com/article/20050519/a_news/70815009 https://www.nytimes.com/1982/10/23/us/conviction-in-casino-bombing.html https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/newss-harveys-casino-bomb/view https://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Lawyer-allegedly-killed-by-wife-who-hid-criminal-1083525.php https://archive.org/details/MSNBCW_20181112_040000_Dateline_Extra Marked for Death by Brian J Karem https://www.kcra.com/article/dutra-sentenced-in-mcnabney-murder/6358281# https://www.newspapers.com/image/629812964/?terms=sarah%2Bdutra Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

//Criminal Conduct debuts on March 23rd.// Get an inside look into the making of the new podcast. Thank you to Jerri Williams from FBI Retired Case File Review for helping us with this bonus episode. You can listen to the episode one now on Patreon. https://www.patreon.com/posts/34832524 Subscribe to Criminal Conduct now so you won't miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On 12th July, 2002 Jong Ok Shin a Korean language student was brutally murdered while living in Bournemouth. A local drug addicted man, Omar Benguit was quickly identified as the prime suspect.  But shortly after, it would emerge that at the time of Ms Shin's death, a man that had committed two murders, was living just streets away.  ********* Thanks to our sponsors for today's episode: Sign up today with Better Help to start professional online counselling. Get 10% off your first month when you visit https://www.betterhelp.com/mens (https://ritual.com/mens) Don't forget to check out the True Crime Couple podcast (https://audioboom.com/channels/4914727) Try the casual mobile puzzle game Best Fiends today! Find it on the Apple App store (https://apps.apple.com/us/app/best-fiends-puzzle-adventure/id868013618) and Google Play (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.Seriously.BestFiends&hl=en) !  ******** Find us on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/mensreapod/) or Twitter (https://twitter.com/MensReaPod) ! With thanks to our supporters on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/MensReaPod) ! Donate today to get access to bonus and ad-free episodes! This week's featured podcast is the new show Criminal Conduct - an investigative show about people who been wronged, done wrong, or have gotten caught in the middle. Find it here (https://podcasts.apple.com/ie/podcast/criminal-conduct/id1496833335) ********* Theme Music: Quinn’s Song: The Dance Begins Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com (http://incompetech.com/) ) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Additional Music:   Allemande (Sting) by Wahneta Meixsell. Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ ********** Sources: R v Omar Benguit [2014] EWCA Crim 690 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2014/690.html Tom Rawstorne, “A body in an Italian church, locks of stolen hair... and a chilling link to this British mother's murder” in The Daily Mail https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1262663/A-body-Italian-church-locks-stolen-hair---chilling-link-British-mothers-murder.html#ixzz1nD1KzOvo (1 April 2010)  “Man with fetish for cutting women's hair 'murdered and mutilated mother-of-two'” in The Daily Mail https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1387595/Danilo-Restivo-murdered-mutilated-mother-Heather-Barnett.html#ixzz1n342DCRI (17 May 2011)  Jane Reader, “Killer Danilo Restivo fighting plans to deport him to Italy by claiming right to family” in The Bournemouth Daily Echo https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/11019440.killer-danilo-restivo-fighting-plans-to-deport-him-to-italy-by-claiming-right-to-family-life/ (19 February 2014)  Paula Roberts and Andy Martin, “Heather Barnett jury told of 'deliberate false alibi' by Danilo Restivo” in The Bournemouth Daily Echo https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/9032958.heather-barnett-jury-told-of-deliberate-false-alibi-by-danilo-restivo/ (18 May 2011)  Paula Roberts, “Law chiefs to discuss Omar Benguit's bid for freedom” in The Bournemouth Daily Echo https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/9916854.law-chiefs-to-discuss-omar-benguits-bid-for-freedom/ (7 September 2012)  Tobias Jones, “Danilo Restivo's murder conviction is just the tip of the iceberg” in The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jun/29/danilo-restivo-murder-conviction-iceberg (29 June 2011)  Steven Morris, “How Damilo Restivo was caught” in The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jun/29/how-danilo-restivo-was-caught (29 June 2011)  Paula Roberts, “Student's killer's case reviewed as Danilo Restivo is made a suspect” in The Bournemouth Daily Echo https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/9553795.student-killers-case-reviewed-as-danilo-restivo-is-made-a-suspect/ (25 February 2012) Andy Martin, “Restivo jury hears DNA evidence” in The Bournemouth Daily Echo https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/9089217.restivo-jury-hears-dna-evidence/ (16 June 2011)  “Portsmouth 'Making a Murderer' innocence project working to clear killer Omar Benguit's name” in The Portsmouth News https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/crime/portsmouth-making-murderer-innocence-project-working-clear-killer-omar-benguits-name-1266803 (18 February 2016)  Alex Forsythe, “'Hair-in-hand' killer Danilo Restivo in appeal” from BBC.com https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-england-dorset-19904969/hair-in-hand-killer-danilo-restivo-in-appeal (10 October 2012)  “Convicted murderer Omar Benguit waiting on appeal decision” in The Southern Daily Echo https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/11101434.convicted-murderer-omar-benguit-waiting-on-appeal-decision/ (25 March 2014)  Marika Henneberg, “Lost in the system: The case of Omar Benguit” from TheJusticeGap.com https://www.thejusticegap.com/lost-system-case-omar-benguit/ (16 January 2017)  Marika Henneberg, “Omar Benguit: 'I would rather die than admit to something I haven't done” from TheJusticeGap.com https://www.thejusticegap.com/omar-benguit-i-would-rather-die-than-admit-to-something-i-havent-done/ (19 November 2015)  Bronagh Munro, “Unmaking a murderer: After 16 years in prison, could Omar Benguit clear his name?” from BBC.co.uk https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/2136f656-6b44-48bb-9c09-a270b9ecab21 (5 July 2018)  Tobais Jones, Blood on the Altar: In search of a serial killer (London: Faber and Faber, 2012) available here (https://www.amazon.com/Blood-Altar-Tobias-Jones/dp/0571274935) BBC3 – Unsolved: The man with no Alibi available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pLLOGcawh0 Clips of Jeremy Kyle interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiszoCdQaV4 Website: http://www.omarbenguit.co.uk/ Wikis:  Murder of Jong Ok Shin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jong-Ok_Shin Danilo Restivo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danilo_Restivo History of Bournemouth - https://www.bournemouth.co.uk/explore/history-of-bournemouth

On September 2, 2010, 24-year-old Michelle O’Connell broke up with her boyfriend, St. Johns  County Sheriff Deputy Jeremy Banks. Minutes later, she’s dead.  The St. Johns Sheriff’s Office quickly ruled the case a suicide, without examining crucial forensic evidence or interviewing key witnesses. A medical examiner ruled her death a homicide, yet other official investigations failed to gain traction. And her boyfriend Deputy Jeremy Banks was never charged and is still working as a St. Johns County Sheriff’s Deputy. Years later, an amateur sleuth named Eli Washtock winds up murdered after investigating Michelle O’Connell’s death. What did he find out? Criminal Conduct is an investigative true-crime podcast series hosted by John Taylor and Javier Leiva. The hosts retrace the footsteps of the Eli Washtock, the slain sleuth—picking up the investigation where he left off. The trailer is available now. The podcast will be debut this Spring 2020 on all podcast platforms:Apple Podcasts - https://apple.co/2S4KaoG Google Play - http://bit.ly/CriminalConGoogleStitcher - http://bit.ly/CriminalConStitcherSpotify - https://spoti.fi/2S00wz7 

On September 2, 2010, 24-year-old Michelle O’Connell broke up with her boyfriend, St. Johns  County Sheriff Deputy Jeremy Banks. Minutes later, she’s dead.  The St. Johns Sheriff’s Office quickly ruled the case a suicide, without examining crucial forensic evidence or interviewing key witnesses. A medical examiner ruled her death a homicide, yet other official investigations failed to gain traction. And her boyfriend Deputy Jeremy Banks was never charged and is still working as a St. Johns County Sheriff’s Deputy. Years later, an amateur sleuth named Eli Washtock winds up murdered after investigating Michelle O’Connell’s death. What did he find out? Criminal Conduct is an investigative true-crime podcast series hosted by John Taylor and Javier Leiva. The hosts retrace the footsteps of the Eli Washtock, the slain sleuth—picking up the investigation where he left off. The trailer is available now. The podcast will be debut this Spring 2020 on all podcast platforms:Apple Podcasts - https://apple.co/2S4KaoG Google Play - http://bit.ly/CriminalConGoogleStitcher - http://bit.ly/CriminalConStitcherSpotify - https://spoti.fi/2S00wz7 

On September 2nd, 2010, 24 year-old Michelle O’Connell broke up with her boyfriend, St. Johns County Sheriff's Deputy, Jeremy Banks. Minutes later, she was dead. The St. Johns Sheriff’'s Office quickly ruled the case a suicide, without examining crucial forensic evidence or interviewing any key witnesses. Other official investigations failed to gain traction. Her boyfriend, Deputy Jeremy Banks was never charged and is still working as a St. Johns County Sheriff'’s Deputy. Years later, an amateur sleuth named Eli Washtock winds up murdered after investigating Michelle O’Connell’s death. What did he find out? Criminal Conduct is an investigative true crime podcast series hosted by John Taylor and Javier Leiva. The hosts retrace the footsteps of Eli Washtock, the slain sleuth; picking up the investigation where he left off. 'Criminal Conduct' will be released in the spring of 2020. Subscribe now on all podcast platforms. Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2S4KaoG Google Play: http://bit.ly/CriminalConGoogle Stitcher: http://bit.ly/CriminalConStitcher Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2S00wz7   Support the show.

On September 2nd, 2010, 24 year-old Michelle O’Connell broke up with her boyfriend, St. Johns County Sheriff’s Deputy, Jeremy Banks. Minutes later, she was dead. The St. Johns Sheriff’s Office quickly ruled the case a suicide, without examining crucial forensic evidence or interviewing any key witnesses. A medical examiner ruled her death a homicide, yet other investigations failed to gain traction. Her boyfriend, Deputy Jeremy Banks was never charged and is still working as a St. Johns County Sheriff’s Deputy. Years later, an amateur sleuth named Eli Washtock winds up murdered after investigating Michelle O’Connell’s death. What did he find out? ‘Criminal Conduct’ is an investigative true crime podcast series hosted by John Taylor and Javier Leiva. The hosts retrace the footsteps of Eli Washtock, the slain sleuth; picking up the investigation where he left off. ‘Criminal Conduct’ will be released in the spring of 2020. Subscribe now on all podcast platforms. criminalconduct.net Apple Podcast https://apple.co/2S4KaoG Google Play http://bit.ly/CriminalConGoogle Stitcher http://bit.ly/CriminalConStitcher Spotify https://spoti.fi/2S0 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Criminal Conduct is an investigative true-crime podcast series hosted by John Taylor and Javier Leiva. In season 1, the hosts look into the death of Michelle O'Connell, picking up the investigation where murdered sleuth, Eli Washtock, left off. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Simon's report for pan-Asian news network CNA.

John takes a deep dive into the Mueller Report and how it was vastly different from what Attorney General Bill Barr claimed it would be. Should, and will, Trump be impeached based on what we now know?

 In today’s podcast, Richard L. Duquette discusses A Victim's Guide to Sentencing with Michael Norton, an attorney from North San Diego County.   Criminal Conduct   Many bicycle and pedestrians fall victim to criminal conduct in the process of being injured. The issue then becomes how do you compensate them.   Victims can seek punishment and retribution. Some of the accused end up in prison for their criminal conduct. However that’s separate from collecting money.   Who Becomes the Target?   Many times, in a criminal case, the defense attorney will work with the personal injury attorney and exchange information. Their common goal is to target the insurance company.   When the attorneys work together, it can facilitate a prompt settlement with the insurance company.   A Defense Attorney’s Perspective   It’s very important for the defense attorney and the personal injury attorney to work together.      The defendant's attorney recognizes the victim has input into the case. The D.A. will ask the victim about what the final outcome is, if they are ok with that outcome and what they would prefer.   The defense attorney wants his victim to be as happy as they can be under the circumstances. If the victim is taken care of, such as a prompt settlement with the insurance company, they are more likely to being receptive to alternate forms of custody. To hear more about A Victim's Guide to Sentencing, and Michael Norton’s take on the interplay between the personal injury attorney and the defense attorney, download and listen to the entire episode.   If you are short on time, here are the highlights of A Victim's Guide to Sentencing:   How can a victim’s guide assist your case? (1:25) Criminal police reports vs. simple traffic collision reports? (3:35) Restitution and different programs.  (7:57) What is a declaration important?  (12:24) Benefit to defendant and taxpayers? (19:08)     Connect with Richard L. Duquette at the following links:   Richard's Website Email Richard Call Richard: 760-730-0500 Connect with Richard on Facebook Follow Richard on Twitter     © 2016 Law Firm of Richard L. Duquette  

    In today’s podcast, Richard discusses what to expect when you end up in criminal court and what your Cyclist Rights in Court are.   Victims of Criminal Conduct   If you or a family member have fallen victim to a vehicular homicide, hit and run or have been hit by a drunk driver, you have the right to be heard and compensated.   Victim Impact Statement   Sometimes just being heard is one of the biggest ways to heal during a difficult situation. You can walk up to the podium and explain to the judge what your losses are. You can even comment on sentencing of the defendant. Being heard and apologized to in court is a very healing experience.   Notifications   You have the right to be notified by the district attorney and the probation department of the probation department, especially if you are subpoenaed. You have the right to be told of court dates, the status of the defendant and what kind of sentence they received.   To hear more about your Cyclist Rights in Court, download and listen to the entire episode.   If you are short on time, here are the highlights of Cyclist Rights in Court:   Right to be heard (1:38) Recovery of evidence (2:50) Rights to economic compensation? (3:20) What about pain and suffering restitution? (4:47) Enforcing court orders? (5:47) Civil vs. Criminal (6:24) What is a restitution hearing? (7:28)   Connect with Richard L. Duquette at the following links:   Richard's Website Email Richard Call Richard: 760-730-0500 Connect with Richard on Facebook Follow Richard on Twitter © 2016 Law Firm of Richard L. Duquette  

Recent two FDNY EMS Paramedics have been accused with faking an ambyulance call report after some confusion with a DNR. We all know that the Call Report is a legal document. But did these medics act on compassion based on the patients and family wishes? Or did they make such a grave error as to cost them their jobs and even jail time?Join us for a special live show and give your thoughts on the topic.Here is a link to the article in the Staten Island Advance. It should get your juices flowing for sure.http://webogi.com/bhlzBS 

Recent two FDNY EMS Paramedics have been accused with faking an ambyulance call report after some confusion with a DNR. We all know that the Call Report is a legal document. But did these medics act on compassion based on the patients and family wishes? Or did they make such a grave error as to cost them their jobs and even jail time?Join us for a special live show and give your thoughts on the topic.Here is a link to the article in the Staten Island Advance. It should get your juices flowing for sure.http://webogi.com/bhlzBS