Traditional Hawaiian method of cooking
POPULARITY
Why should God forgive us? Rabbi Fohrman and Imu trace Yom Kippur's mystery through the Book of Jonah and across the breadth of the Torah.Want to check out the printable transcript and recap for this episode? It's all here on our season page: https://bit.ly/4xFZlasWant access to the video version of this podcast, an exclusive ad-free feed, and all prior seasons of BLNO? Plus - support the Torah that you love? Become an Aleph Beta member: https://bit.ly/4clIPUGFor a dvar Torah from Rabbi Fohrman on this week's parsha: https://bit.ly/4ybYIFMFor “Rosh Hashanah: Day Of Judgment Or A Day Of Joy?”: https://bit.ly/4cUkBkzFor the High Holiday Reader: https://bit.ly/3SEzNv9Already an Aleph Beta member? To keep listening without ads, switch over to the exclusive, ad-free feed: https://bit.ly/3T8Jq5DTo watch the video version of this podcast: https://bit.ly/4wV3vdp We love to hear from you! Click here: https://bit.ly/4gnhtjl to share your thoughts, insights, questions, and reactions by voice note, or send us an email at info@alephbeta.org.A Book Like No Other is a product of Aleph Beta, and made possible through the generous support of Shari and Nathan Lindenbaum. Aleph Beta is a Torah media company dedicated to spreading the joy and love of meaningful Torah learning worldwide.
Why should God forgive us? Rabbi Fohrman and Imu trace Yom Kippur's mystery through the Book of Jonah and across the breadth of the Torah.Want to check out the printable transcript and recap for this episode? It's all here on our season page: https://bit.ly/3UonSSPWant access to the video version of this podcast, an exclusive ad-free feed, and all prior seasons of BLNO? Plus - support the Torah that you love? Become an Aleph Beta member: https://bit.ly/4qL5hg4For a Dvar Torah from Rabbi Fohrman on this week's parsha: https://bit.ly/4hXDUwKAlready an Aleph Beta member? To keep listening without ads, switch over to the exclusive, ad-free feed: https://bit.ly/4ce6erbWatch the video version of this podcast: https://bit.ly/4xYk2hI We love to hear from you! Click here: https://bit.ly/4gnhtjl to share your thoughts, insights, questions, and reactions by voice note, or send us an email at info@alephbeta.org.A Book Like No Other is a product of Aleph Beta, and made possible through the generous support of Shari and Nathan Lindenbaum. Aleph Beta is a Torah media company dedicated to spreading the joy and love of meaningful Torah learning worldwide.
Marco Witzmann, Head of Requirements Portal at Altium, returns to the Altium OnTrack Podcast to show host Zach Peterson what the tool formerly known as Requirements Manager has become. In a live demo, Marco starts from a plain-language email about a wind-farm inspection drone and watches the new engineering assistant turn it into properly formulated requirements, complete with TBD placeholders instead of invented numbers. From there he breaks a high-level product spec down into mechanical, electronics, and flight software specifications, with parent-child links and full traceability generated automatically. Every change is proposed first and applied only when you approve it, so the agent never silently rewrites your project. The heart of the episode is the workflow every PCB designer recognizes: you are handed a hundred-page IMU specification and told to pick the MCU. Marco drag-and-drops the PDF into the AI-assisted importer, lets it separate real requirements from tables of contents and revision history, then asks the agent which requirements actually drive MCU selection. The answer comes back as a clean parameter-and-value spec — supply voltage, ambient temperature range, power budget, clock speed, end-to-end latency — linked back to the originals, and ready to drop straight into an Octopart parametric search. Marco and Zach also dig into what AI should and should not decide for you, why requirements work is really about faster iteration rather than perfect first drafts, how skills let a team standardize the way requirements get written, and what is next on the roadmap: API access, simpler ECAD integration, and per-project access control.
Why should God forgive us? Rabbi Fohrman and Imu trace Yom Kippur's mystery through the Book of Jonah and across the breadth of the Torah.Want to check out the printable transcript and recap for this episode? It's all here on our season page.Want access to the video version of this podcast, an exclusive ad-free feed, and all prior seasons of BLNO? Plus - support the Torah that you love? Become an Aleph Beta member.Take in a Dvar Torah from Rabbi Fohrman on this week's parsha.Already an Aleph Beta member? To keep listening without ads, switch over to the exclusive, ad-free feed.Watch the video version of this podcast. We love to hear from you! Click here to share your thoughts, insights, questions, and reactions by voice note, or send us an email at info@alephbeta.org.A Book Like No Other is a product of Aleph Beta, and made possible through the generous support of Shari and Nathan Lindenbaum. Aleph Beta is a Torah media company dedicated to spreading the joy and love of meaningful Torah learning worldwide.
Why should God forgive us? Rabbi Fohrman and Imu trace Yom Kippur's mystery through the Book of Jonah and across the breadth of the Torah.Want to check out the printable transcript and recap for this episode? It's all here on our season page.Want access to the video version of this podcast, an exclusive ad-free feed, and all prior seasons of BLNO? Plus - support the Torah that you love? Become an Aleph Beta member.For a dvar Torah from Rabbi Fohrman on this week's parsha, click here.Already an Aleph Beta member? To keep listening without ads, switch over to the exclusive, ad-free feed.Watch the video version of this podcast. We love to hear from you! Click here to share your thoughts, insights, questions, and reactions by voice note, or send us an email at info@alephbeta.org.A Book Like No Other is a product of Aleph Beta, and made possible through the generous support of Shari and Nathan Lindenbaum. Aleph Beta is a Torah media company dedicated to spreading the joy and love of meaningful Torah learning worldwide.
Why should God forgive us? Rabbi Fohrman and Imu trace Yom Kippur's mystery through the Book of Jonah and across the breadth of the Torah.Want to check out the printable transcript and recap for this episode? It's all here on our season page.Want access to the video version of this podcast, an exclusive ad-free feed, and all prior seasons of BLNO? Plus - support the Torah that you love? Become an Aleph Beta member.Already an Aleph Beta member? To keep listening without ads, switch over to the exclusive, ad-free feed. Watch the video version of this podcast here. We love to hear from you! Click here to share your thoughts, insights, questions, and reactions by voice note, or send us an email at info@alephbeta.org.A Book Like No Other is a product of Aleph Beta, and made possible through the generous support of Shari and Nathan Lindenbaum. Aleph Beta is a Torah media company dedicated to spreading the joy and love of meaningful Torah learning worldwide.
Why should God forgive us? Rabbi Fohrman and Imu trace Yom Kippur's mystery through the Book of Jonah and across the breadth of the Torah.Want to check out the printable transcript and recap for this episode? It's all here on our season page.Want access to the video version of this podcast, an exclusive ad-free feed, and all prior seasons of BLNO? Plus - support the Torah that you love? Become an Aleph Beta member.Already an Aleph Beta member? To keep listening without ads, switch over to the exclusive, ad-free feed.Watch the video version of this podcast here. We love to hear from you! Click here to share your thoughts, insights, questions, and reactions by voice note, or send us an email at info@alephbeta.org.A Book Like No Other is a product of Aleph Beta, and made possible through the generous support of Shari and Nathan Lindenbaum. Aleph Beta is a Torah media company dedicated to spreading the joy and love of meaningful Torah learning worldwide.
One Piece chapter 1190 is out now and this week we talk about our main man SCOPPER GABAN!! We also discuss the meaning of Joy Boys history and how Imu doesnt really know what is going on.
Nakamas
Auditar a la Administración: análisis técnico integral de siniestralidad, el RGC, infraestructuras y el factor humano (2004-2026) A partir del trabajo de investigación y auditoría de campo desarrollado por Juan Carlos Toribio (Unión Internacional para la Defensa del Motociclista - IMU) y José Lagunar (Auto FM), desglosamos con datos oficiales las inconsistencias del discurso institucional, los retrocesos del Reglamento General de Circulación, los fallos de conservación viaria y la urgente necesidad de educación y responsabilidad cívica. 1. Desmontando la narrativa oficial sobre la siniestralidad (2004-2026) La auditoría independiente realizada sobre los registros del Registro Nacional de Víctimas de Accidentes de Tráfico, el Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) y las memorias oficiales de la Dirección General de Tráfico (DGT) cuestiona severamente las afirmaciones del ministro del Interior, Fernando Grande-Marlaska, ante la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). 1.1. La brecha del "70%": realidad vs. discurso En escenarios internacionales y redes institucionales, el Ministerio del Interior afirmó que las políticas públicas habían reducido cerca de un 70% la mortalidad en carretera en las últimas dos décadas, publicitando un descenso de la tasa de fallecidos de 128 a 36 por millón de habitantes. El cruce de datos oficiales revela dos distorsiones estadísticas fundamentales: Reducción real (2004-2024): Al analizar el censo consolidado de fallecidos entre 2004 y 2024, la reducción real acumulada es del 62,4%, no del 70%. Sesgo en la tasa por millón: En el año 2004, la tasa real de partida según los censos del INE era de 110 fallecidos por millón de habitantes, no de 128. La utilización de denominadores demográficos en crecimiento diluye el estancamiento de las cifras absolutas.[ Balance de Siniestralidad Vial en Carretera: Periodo 2019 - 2024 +------------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Indicador de Siniestralidad | Variación Consolidada (DGT) | +------------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Fallecidos en carretera (Interurb) | +4% de incremento real | | Heridos graves hospitalizados | +5% de incremento real | | Fallecidos en zona urbana | -1,7% de descenso | +------------------------------------+------------------------------------+ Durante el periodo de gestión comprendido entre 2019 y 2024 (bajo la dirección de Fernando Grande-Marlaska y Pere Navarro), los fallecidos en vías interurbanas aumentaron un 4%, acompañados de un repunte del 5% en heridos graves hospitalizados. Aunque en zona urbana los fallecidos se redujeron un 1,7%, esta modesta mejora resulta insuficiente para compensar el deterioro de las cifras en vías interurbanas, arrojando un balance global negativo. 1.2. El modelo sancionador: "Más denuncias y más muertos"La estrategia gubernamental se ha centrado prioritariamente en la intensificación de la presión sancionadora automaria: Evolución 2019-2024: Las denuncias tramitadas por la DGT pasaron de 4.684.286 a más de 5,4 millones anuales (+18%, lo que supone 728.814 sanciones adicionales al año). Evolución 2004-2024: En dos décadas, las sanciones aumentaron un 52% (de 2,8 a 5,4 millones anuales). Cifra provisional 2025: La actividad de la Agrupación de Tráfico de la Guardia Civil refleja un salto de casi 1 millón de denuncias adicionales en doce meses. Incoherencia la Eficacia Sancionadora +----------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------------+ | Periodo Comparado | Variación en Denuncias | Impacto en Mortalidad | +----------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------------+ | 2019 - 2024 | +18% (+728.814 multas/año) | +4% Fallecidos en Vía Alta | +----------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------------+ La evidencia empírica desmonta la hipótesis de que el incremento de sanciones reduce automáticamente la siniestralidad. El reemplazo de la presencia policial presencial —capaz de corregir la conducta en el acto— por cinemómetros automáticos en tramos de bajo riesgo ha consolidado un modelo predominantemente recaudatorio que ahoga el recurso administrativo sin corregir las causas estructurales de los accidentes. 2. Crítica exhaustiva al nuevo Reglamento General de Circulación (Real Decreto 518/2026)El análisis del Real Decreto 518/2026 y de su Exposición de Motivos revela profundas incongruencias normativas, avances puntuales y notables regresiones técnicas. 2.1. Incongruencias terminológicas y falsas premisas Falsa ausencia de cargas: La Exposición de Motivos afirma de forma cínica que la norma "no impone obligaciones a la ciudadanía ni a las empresas", cuando en la práctica introduce nuevas exigencias equipamentales y de comportamiento con sanción asociada.Uso del término 'Rider': Se critica el empleo del anglicismo comunicacional rider en notas oficiales, un término carente de encaje jurídico frente a la categoría legal adecuada: "trabajadores en motocicleta". 2.2. Aciertos normativos Homologación de cascos: Se elimina definitivamente la vetusta referencia a cascos "certificados" bajo la extinta norma española UNE 26428, exigiendo de forma exclusiva cascos "homologados" bajo el Reglamento CEPE/ONU 22 (versiones R22.05 y R22.06), corrigiendo una anomalía legal que persistía desde hace décadas. 2.3. Regresiones e inseguridad jurídica Desprotección del motorista en adelantamientos (Art. 85): La nueva redacción del artículo 85 omite de forma alarmante la obligación de mantener una distancia lateral mínima de 1,5 metros al adelantar a motocicletas, reservando esta distancia exclusivamente para peatones, animales, ciclomotores, Vehículos de Movilidad Personal (VMP), ciclistas y conjuntos de ciclistas. Conflicto normativo del chaleco reflectante (Anexo 12 RGV): Se exige que los trabajadores en motocicleta porten como dotación obligatoria un chaleco de alta visibilidad certificado bajo la norma ISO 20471. Esta obligación entra en conflicto directo con los chalecos airbag de última generación, los cuales en su mayoría no cuentan con la certificación ISO 20471. Obligar al trabajador a vestir un chaleco reflectante convencional sobre el sistema airbag compromete la correcta expansión neumática del dispositivo en caso de impacto. Equipación obligatoria en calzado y guantes: Se establece la obligación de circular con calzado cerrado que cubra la totalidad del pie en todo tipo de vías, y guantes de protección en vías interurbanas. Aunque existe la norma de homologación europea EN 13594 para guantes de motociclista, la facultad otorgada al Ministerio del Interior para dictar especificaciones propias abre la puerta a incoherencias técnicas. Profundidad de dibujo en vehículos pesados (N2/N3): Se fija un límite mínimo de 1 mm de profundidad en las "ranuras principales" del neumático para vehículos de transporte de mercancías. Sin embargo, la norma omite definir técnicamente qué se considera "ranura principal", generando un escenario de indefensión jurídica en las inspecciones de la Agrupación de Tráfico. Bicicletas en sentido contrario y rotondas: Se autoriza a las ordenanzas municipales a permitir la circulación de bicicletas en sentido contrario al flujo del tráfico en calles de carril único. No obstante, se estipula que el ciclista no ostentará la prioridad de paso cuando el ancho de la calzada no permita el cruce simultáneo con garantías, trasladando la responsabilidad del diseño urbano deficiente al usuario vulnerable. Eliminación del margen de 20 km/h: Se insiste en mantener la prohibición de rebasar en 20 km/h el límite de velocidad en carreteras convencionales para realizar adelantamientos a vehículos lentos o ciclistas, prolongando el tiempo y la distancia de exposición al riesgo en el carril contrario. Uso del arcén por motocicletas: En lugar de regular con criterios técnicos objetivos el acceso de las motos al arcén en retenciones urbanas, la norma condiciona esta maniobra a señalizaciones específicas o acuerdos municipales locales, perpetuando la fragmentación normativa. 3. El problema sistémico: infraestructuras deficientes e inacción administrativa La auditoría de campo de IMU demuestra que un elevado porcentaje de siniestros atribuidos al "despiste del conductor" tienen su origen directo en el abandono de la conservación de la red viaria y en la instalación de sistemas de contención ilegales o caducos. 3.1. Casos documentados de fallo de infraestructura Casos de Estudio de Infraestructura Deficiente +-------------------------+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Ubicación | Deficiencia Técnica Detectada | Consecuencia / Vía Legal | +-------------------------+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Puente C-14 (km 144,300)| Sistema de contención caduco | Precipitación mortal de camión; | | | e inviabilidad de absorción | Denegación de responsabilidad | +-------------------------+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Puerto del Pico (Ávila) | Ausencia total de bionda | Justificación como "Calzada Romana"| | | en calzada asfaltada de tráfico | desestimada por riesgo directo | +-------------------------+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vía DSA-555 (Salamanca) | Calzada bidireccional de 2,50 m | Riesgo de colisión frontal sin | | | con vegetación e hitos erróneos | espacio funcional de evasión | +-------------------------+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+ El trágico expediente del puente en la C-14 (km 144,300): En enero de 2018 se registró un deterioro severo del firme; tras un primer accidente, la administración realizó un parcheo superficial. En julio de 2018, un turismo perdió el control en la curva colisionando contra una barrera no homologada que colapsó. En octubre de 2018, en horario nocturno, un camión de carga impactó contra el mismo pretil degradado, precipitándose al vacío con resultado mortal. A pesar de las periciales técnicas que demostraban que el pretil no cumplía los niveles de contención para el tráfico pesado de la vía, la administración autonómica rechazó la responsabilidad patrimonial. El pretexto del patrimonio en el Puerto del Pico (Ávila): La falta de sistemas de contención en tramos de desfiladero se justificó administrativamente bajo el pretexto de no alterar la "calzada romana". IMU denunció la incongruencia de aplicar este criterio a una carretera asfaltada, abierta al tráfico motorizado pesado y que no cumple las normas básicas de contención.Red secundaria en Salamanca (DSA-555): Inspecciones de campo constataron tramos de carretera bidireccional con un ancho funcional de calzada de tan solo 2,50 metros para ambos sentidos de circulación, con vegetación invadiendo la plataforma y pasos de obra sin barreras de protección. 3.2. Marco legal y circular de conservación Desde las Órdenes Circulares históricas (OC 229/71, 3.17, 3.21 de 1991 y 1995, y la instrucción de 2009), la Administración pública tiene el deber legal vinculante de mantener las vías en condiciones acordes con el avance de la técnica. El Artículo 9.1 (sometimiento a la Constitución y al resto del ordenamiento jurídico) y el Artículo 17 (derecho a la seguridad) de la Constitución Española exigen actuar contra las trampas del asfalto. La desatención de estas partidas presupuestarias demuestra un modelo que prioriza la captación de recursos mediante sanciones antes que el mantenimiento de las carreteras. 4. El factor humano: percepción del riesgo, formación y responsabilidad cívica La mejora de la seguridad vial exige abordar el factor humano desde una perspectiva científica y rigurosa, superando el mero castigo administrativo. 4.1. La percepción del riesgo y la educación de la mirada El comportamiento humano al volante responde a patrones biomecánicos e intuitivos. Un ejemplo claro se observa en la infancia: el llanto condicionado del niño solo se activa cuando percibe la mirada directa de la madre, demostrando que la atención visual regula la respuesta emocional. En la conducción, la mirada determina la trayectoria del vehículo:El cálculo a 120 km/h: A una velocidad de 120 km/h, el vehículo recorre 33,3 metros por segundo. Un tiempo de reacción promedio de 2 segundos implica recorrer 66,6 metros a ciegas. Cursos de formación IMU estructurados en 12 horas: 4 teóricas en remoto y 8 prácticas, insisten en dirigir la visión hacia el punto más lejano de la curva (foco estratégico) y no hacia el obstáculo inmediato (foco reactivo), permitiendo anticipar la maniobra y estabilizar el reparto de masas.Técnica del pasajero en moto: El acompañante debe acompañar la trayectoria mirando por encima del hombro interior del piloto hacia la entrada de la curva, manteniendo alineado el centro de gravedad del conjunto. 4.2. Equipación, distracciones y el protocolo en caso de emergencia"Mejor sudar que sangrar": La equipación técnica de protección (casco homologado, chaqueta con protecciones Nivel 2, guantes EN 13594 y calzado técnico) debe utilizarse ininterrumpidamente, con independencia de las altas temperaturas estivales. Gestión de la atención móvil: El uso de dispositivos móviles debe erradicarse en marcha. En caso de utilizar manos libres, la capacidad de concentración cognitiva se degradará significativamente a partir del primer minuto de conversación. Las llamadas urgentes deben limitarse a una duración inferior a los 50 segundos o, preferentemente, realizarse con el vehículo estacionado de forma segura en una estación de servicio.Protocolo PAS y auxilio obligatorio: Ante un siniestro, todo conductor está obligado legalmente (Art. 195 del Código Penal) a proteger la zona, avisar a los servicios de emergencia (112) y socorrer a las víctimas. 5. El diagnóstico elaborado por Auto FM e IMU evidencia la necesidad de un cambio radical en la política de seguridad vial en España: Salvar vidas en el asfalto exige sustituir el afán recaudatorio y la manipulación estadística por un compromiso ético con la conservación de las infraestructuras, la precisión técnica en el Reglamento General de Circulación y una formación cívica continua que proteja a todos los usuarios de la vía.
Join the community: https://linktr.ee/blacksenseisocietyGaban stepped in front of Imu, cut up island sized branches, grabbed Luffy by the neck and told him he is not built for the Pirate King title yet. The internet is calling it a top five moment. We are not moved. Radell and Myles break down One Piece Chapter 1190, the Joy Boy line that changes how we read the Roger Pirates, why Luffy's stocks were never actually in shambles, and why we are stamping Zoro and Sanji BOTH losing before Elbaf ends.SPOILER WARNING: Full One Piece Chapter 1190 spoilers start at 6:38 and run through 47:06. If you are not caught up, skip to 48:14 for the general anime and manga talk.TIMESTAMPS00:00 Intro: we are back after another break00:42 The Drake hot take fallout: why is Kanye top five and Drake is not?03:03 Spider-Man Brand New Day: Myles is not sold and Radell is heated05:45 Let the Luffy hate begin06:15 Linktree, Discord and community plug06:38 Setting the stage: Luffy is standing at the end, we are good07:46 Chapter title and cover page: Luffy and Shanks in Fuschia Village08:28 Gaban intervenes: best lumberjack impression on the Elbaf trees11:07 Gaban grabs Luffy: the Pirate King speech the fandom asked for12:37 The second Roger Pirate reality check: Rayleigh, then Gaban15:04 Inherited will: will Luffy ever actually communicate with Roger?19:21 Plum Mantis and the Reddit Haki summon debate20:17 Imu goes through the weapon wheel: the Hanebami bone eater sword21:12 "We have no intention of obeying a man from the past": Joy Boy gets checked23:47 Do we deserve a Roger Pirates spinoff, or is that useless fan service?26:20 Imu is hitting his time limit27:07 Luffy commands himself to heal, same as the Kaido fight28:34 The double page spread: Crocus, Rayleigh, Gaban, Oden, Whitebeard, Shanks30:37 Deku vs All Might energy: will Luffy surpass Roger's impact?34:27 Komodo Divine Gates: Gaban bisects a Dressrosa sized branch36:22 Imu takes Gaban's arm37:28 Luffy stands back up: the stocks were never in shambles41:32 Predictions: Zoro loses, Sanji loses, and the kids get taken44:59 Who trains the crew next? Shanks' crew vs Kid vs the man with the burn scar46:22 Another break: it is a Shonen Jump holiday, not Oda47:06 Final verdict: second best showing against Imu, and that is all it was48:14 One Punch Man check in48:57 Hunter x Hunter: the Succession War arc is finally moving fast51:31 Shonen Jump's top seller under a million: is the new era cooked?52:12 This anime season is dead: only Bleach is carrying53:21 Next season preview: Apothecary, Black Clover, Dragon Ball Super Beerus again54:31 Basketball creator economy tangent: the Newman family's missed route1:02:04 Wrap up: Open Dojo at the hour and twentyBlack Sensei Society is an anime, manga and pop culture podcast covering power scaling debates, chapter reactions, tier lists, hot takes and community games. New episodes weekly.Business and booking: blacksenseisociety@gmail.comonepieceonepiece1190onepiecechapter1190imugabanluffyelbafstrawhatcrewgold rogerjoyboyanimepodcastmangareactionpowerscalingblacksenseisociety
Today's episode Matt and Justin discuss the fallout of scopper and Imu fighting. Was scopper being a good coach or is he actually disappointed in Luffy? How much more time does Imu have left? Let's talk about it!
In this episode the guys discuss the latest One Piece chapter. Rico blame's manga fans for underestimating Imu leading oda to show case why Imu is truly the king of the world! Tune in to hear the most believable theory ever!!
Hello, welcome everyone and eyes down for The Big FEC Quiz Of The Year! For the first time in 224 episodes of semi-popular pontification, rarely informed speculation and increasingly elaborate two-wheeled tangents, him Simon Hargreaves and him Martin Fitz-Gibbons finally stop pretending to know all the answers… and start asking the questions instead. Recorded live during the splendidly spectacular 'Moors The Merrier' tour of Yorkshire and the Pennines, organised with forensic fastidiousness by the lovely Paul, Jo and Ollie at MCi Tours (mcitours.com), you're in for an hour of motorcycle-themed pub-quiz-style nerdery, audience participation, healthy competitiveness, unhealthy pedantry and the occasional outbreak of actual knowledge. So sharpen your pencil, put down your phone, keep your own score (no cheating at the back), and see whether you know your six-axis IMU from your elbow. Questions range from the swinging sixties right through to the latest motorcycling movers and shakers, from technological firsts to racing record breakers, celebrating all manner of obscure biking trivia that ought to be more useful than it actually is. And if you're struggling with the question, 'Who should I get my bike insurance from?' then the correct answer is Bennetts, Britain's best bike insurer. If your policy is up for renewal soon then be sure to get a quote direct from bennetts.co.uk – and if it isn't, then be sure to enjoy all the delectably free-to-air content piled high at bikesocial.co.uk, on the BikeSocial YouTube channel, or at BikeSocial BikeClub (a place where people do actually know the answers to difficult questions). Back to the usual shtick next time – so until then please keep emailing all your thoughts, opinions, wonderings, ponderings and musings to anything@frontendchatter.com Thankyouloveyoubye
Ty and Rico react to the insane events of One Piece Chapter 1188 as Luffy finally clashes with Imu. The fight has the crew questioning who the true final boss of One Piece really is and whether the Straw Hats have any chance of surviving the Elbaf arc.Plus, the guys share what other manga they've been reading and which series are worth checking out right now.
One Piece chapter 1189 is here and Luffy is literally getting killed Live. we also talk about the 19 Swords that Imu is using against Luffy and the Strawhats.
In der neusten Folge des 4 Kaiser One Piece Podcast, besprechen wir die aktuellen Geschehnisse auf Elban. Aron, Dani, Tom und Tudy diskutieren über Imu's Fähigkeiten und die Papagein Theorie!Viel Spaß mit der Folge :^)Das ist der 4 Kaiser PodcastDer 4 Kaiser Podcast ist ein deutscher One Piece Podcasts in welchem Dani, Tom, Aron und Tudy die aktuellen Geschehnisse des Mangas und Animes One Piece besprechen und diskutieren. Woche für Woche analysieren wir die einzelnen Chapter und besprechen was genau passiert ist und was noch kommen kann.Um nichts zu Verpassen, Folgt uns auch auf anderen Kanälen:Linktree: https://linktr.ee/die4kaiser Twitter: https://twitter.com/vierkaiserYouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@die4-kaiser752/featuredInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/dievierkaiser/?
Nakamas
Catch every BSS episode, socials, and community links here: https://linktr.ee/blacksenseisocietyRadell and Santo are back after a break (Oda's fault, not theirs) to break down One Piece Chapter 1189, and Imu might finally be getting some respect after weeks of slander. This one gets heated: Luffy's strength gets called into question hard enough to land him on "Fraud Watch," a weapon reveal has the hosts theorizing a direct link between Imu's swords and Mihawk's Yoru, and the Loki vs Luffy power scaling debate goes back and forth more than once before the guys land somewhere new.SPOILER WARNING: full breakdown of One Piece Chapter 1189 starts immediately after the intro. Skip to 0:50 if you want to jump straight into spoiler territory, or stop here if you're not caught up.In this episode:The Imu redemption arc gets its moment, Luffy's strength gets put on trial, Mihawk's sword lore connects to Imu's arsenal in a way the guys didn't see coming, and the Elbaf flashback digs into Shanks and Loki's war room strategy against the World Government.TIMESTAMPS (approximate, pending final edit verification)0:00 Intro and catching up after the break0:50 Link tree plug and what's new on the socials2:11 Luffy officially placed on Fraud Watch4:10 Imu's sword count theory and the Mihawk Yoru connection4:18 Breaking down all nineteen swords9:24 Is Loki actually stronger than Luffy right now11:45 Joy Boy vs the Elbaf War God, power scaling talk20:05 Usopp death theory and the One Piece Stampede comparison35:55 Elbaf flashback: Shanks and Loki's throne room war plan40:03 Loki vs Fujitora and Green Bull, more scaling talk60:07 Imu wields the Xing Tian Axe, still talking his talk1:15:00 Santo and Radell revisit who called the Imu turn first1:35:00 Wrap up, socials, and Fantasy Football Discord inviteHosted by Radell and SantoBlack Sensei Society, new episodes every Tuesday, community pod every other FridayKeywords: One Piece Chapter 1189, Imu redemption, Luffy Fraud Watch, Loki One Piece, Elbaf arc, Mihawk swords, Joy Boy power scaling, One Piece podcast, One Piece chapter breakdown, Black Sensei Societyonepieceonepiece1189imuluffyelbafanimepodcastblacksenseisocietymangapodcast
In this episode, we break down why Chainsaw Man took home Best Animated Film over Demon Slayer at Japan Expo and debate whether the judges got it right.From there, the crew jumps into heated power-scaling discussions, including Itachi vs. Minato, hypothetical battles across multiple anime, and the latest One Piece conversations surrounding Loki, Kaido, and Imu. We also discuss upcoming anime releases, industry news, and what fans should expect next.
One Piece chapter 1188 is here and this week we talk all about Gum Gum Genie and how the Toon force is on full display this chapter. We also Theorize about the origins of Imu and Joy Boy, and which one is most likely not from this world.
Nakamas
In der neusten Folge des 4 Kaiser One Piece Podcast, besprechen wir die aktuellen Geschehnisse auf Elban. Aron, Dani, Tom und Tudy diskutieren über Imu's Erinnerungen, Imu's Attacken, die Dschinn Form von Ruffy und natürlich den Treffer von Imu gegnüber Ruffy. Viel Spaß mit der Folge :^)Das ist der 4 Kaiser PodcastDer 4 Kaiser Podcast ist ein deutscher One Piece Podcasts in welchem Dani, Tom, Aron und Tudy die aktuellen Geschehnisse des Mangas und Animes One Piece besprechen und diskutieren. Woche für Woche analysieren wir die einzelnen Chapter und besprechen was genau passiert ist und was noch kommen kann.Um nichts zu Verpassen, Folgt uns auch auf anderen Kanälen:Linktree: https://linktr.ee/die4kaiser Twitter: https://twitter.com/vierkaiserYouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@die4-kaiser752/featuredInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/dievierkaiser/?
EAE, SEUS GEEKS SOCADORES!O capítulo 1186 enfim está publicado e é claro que nossos tripulantes se reuniram para comentar todos os detalhes, principalmente o ponto de Imu ser, finalmente, atingido por Luffy.REDES SOCIAIS DA OFICINAInstagram: @oficinageekrealTwitch: OficinaGeekRealTwitter: @OficinaGeekrealYouTube: Oficina GeekEste episódio foi editado por Marcos Veloso (@eumarcosveloso)
IMU: como funciona o “eletrocardiograma” que anulou o gol de Portugal x Croácia? Tela de Privacidade pode chegar a todos os modelos Galaxy S27. Somente 5% dos domicílios brasileiros ainda não têm internet, revela pesquisa do IBGE. Xbox procura meios para jogadores converterem seus discos em cópias digitais! Entenda. Kindle Translate agora usa IA para traduzir livros para o português. Sistema de segurança dos EUA sofre vazamento de dados; entenda. E eu sou Amanda Fleure, a companhia de vocês nessa noite no Hoje no TecMundo, seu programa diário de tecnologia que começa depois da vinheta envolvente que o editor vai colocar aí pra gente!
(Originally published in April; get your stuff together, Spotify. Anchor never pulled stuff like this.)It's a Patreon poll winner! Well, technically, it tied, but this was the one that didn't have subtitles, so, same same. Wes Anderson's The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou (2004) was a commercial flop, but will it perform better with an aquatic audience than it did with land-based audiences? Do you need to have seen Jacques Cousteau's films to get the jokes? What the heck is an IMU? These and others are the questions that, uh, we ask, while, you know, watching this movie. And talking about it. On a podcast.
Myles and Radell are BACK breaking down One Piece Chapter 1186 "Once More" and the takes are FLYING. Brooke's backstory wraps up, a brand new Celestial Dragon character enters the chat, and Luffy shows up to punch Imu clean in the face. Is Imu officially a fraud? We're putting the entire World Government on notice.https://linktr.ee/blacksenseisocietyTIMESTAMPS:0:00 Intro, Housekeeping5:55 Chapter 1186 "Once More" Begins10:11 Brooke Backstory Ranking (vs Frankie, Robin, Sanji, Ace)17:00 Imu's Dot Dot Dot Moment, Does He Feel Anything?22:00 Celestial Dragon Pregnancy Disease Theory (Bonnie, Candle, Jenny)30:00 LeWevin's Decision to Go to War for Shuri37:00 Groh Manmayor Reveal, The Eyes, Gojo Clan Parallels44:00 Dragon vs Shanks vs Imu Portrayal Debate55:00 Brooke's Amnesia Explanation, Stabbed in the Head Critique1:00:00 Straw Hats Rally to Save Shuri1:04:00 Usopp Needs a Crumb on Elbaf1:07:00 THE PUNCH. Luffy vs Imu in Base. Fraud Watch Activated.1:13:00 Imu vs Blackbeard Portrayal Comparison1:20:00 Akainu, Dragon, and Sabo Endgame Predictions1:28:00 Chapter Rating and Next Chapter PredictionsIn this episode, we break down One Piece Chapter 1186 and go ALL the way in on Imu's portrayal. Brooke's backstory is officially wrapped and while it had its moments, we're ranking it among Oda's weaker efforts. The new character Groh Manmayor brings some serious lore about Celestial Dragon eyes and what Imu is really after. We connect the dots between Shuri, Bonnie, and a pattern of Celestial Dragons using surface dweller women for something bigger.Then Luffy pulls up and CLEANS Imu with a Conqueror's Haki punch in base form. Is Imu cooked? Is Blackbeard the real final boss? We break it all down and give our predictions for where the Elbaf saga goes from here.Subscribe and hit the bell so you never miss an upload. New episodes every Tuesday. Open Dojo drops every other Friday where YOU join the conversation.KEYWORDS:one piece, one piece chapter 1186, one piece manga, imu, luffy vs imu, brooke backstory, groh manmayor, shuri, celestial dragons, elbaf, one piece theory, anime podcast, black sensei society, one piece reaction, one piece breakdown, luffy base form, imu fraud, blackbeard, dragon one piece, shanks
Nakamas
Welcome to The Turf Zone Podcast. This episode features the article “How Variability Within and Between Natural Turfgrass and Synthetic Athletic Fields Impacts Athlete Safety and Performance” written by Ava Veith, Dr. David McCall, Dr. Chase Straw, Dr. Daniel Sandor, Dr. Jay Williams, Elisabeth Kitchen, Kevin Hensler, Aaron Tucker and Dr. Caleb Henderson Authors Note and Context Ava Veith is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Plant Science at Penn State University under the advisement of Dr. Chase Straw, where her research focuses on studying within-field variability and athlete–surface interactions. However, the research presented in this article was conducted during her master's program at Virginia Tech under Dr. David McCall. This study served as a foundational investigation into how variability within and between natural turfgrass and synthetic turf athletic fields influences athletes. The findings from this work have shaped the direction of subsequent doctoral research. Building on this foundation, the planned Ph.D. project aims to examine athlete lower-limb joint biomechanics across natural turfgrass, synthetic turf, and hybrid (natural turfgrass reinforced with synthetic fibers) surfaces using multi-segment inertial measurement units. At the conclusion of this article, the next phase of research will be briefly outlined to demonstrate how it has grown from the master's study. In this way, the Virginia Tech study presented here represents both a completed project and the starting point for a broader, ongoing effort to better understand how the playing surface can affect athlete movement and injury-relevant mechanics. Introduction A safe playing surface is essential for athletic competition. Natural turfgrass and synthetic turf are common playing surfaces used for field sports, and extensive research has been conducted to compare these two surface types. However, limited attention has been given to within-field variability and its impact on athlete safety and performance. Studies often classify athletic fields broadly as synthetic or natural, overlooking critical surface metrics that fluctuate both within and between fields. Key field characteristics such as surface hardness, rotational resistance, soil moisture, thatch depth, and infill depth (for synthetic fields) play a crucial role in assessing field quality. Variability in these factors can be influenced by environmental conditions, management practices, and field usage patterns. Despite the known importance of these factors, current research often fails to account for field-specific inconsistencies, limiting the effectiveness of broad comparisons between surfaces. To improve field safety and optimize athlete performance, interdisciplinary collaboration among turfgrass scientists, sports scientists, and sports medicine professionals is necessary. Evidence-based field management strategies must be developed to ensure more consistent playing conditions, reducing the risk of injury. Wearable technologies such as STATSports GPS trackers (STATSports, 2025) and ankle inertial measurement units (IMUs) (IMeasureU, 2019) provide critical insights into athlete biomechanics, load monitoring, and more. These technologies allow researchers to quantify how different surface conditions influence athletes during performance, offering valuable data for injury prevention strategies. Beyond data collected by wearable technologies, athlete perceptions of field conditions also play a role in performance and injury risk. Unpredictable surface variability can affect player confidence, movement efficiency, and risk-taking behaviors, making perception-based data collection essential. Understanding how athletes experience and perceive different playing surfaces can inform future improvements in field construction and maintenance. The objective of this study is to quantify the impact of surface variability on athlete safety and performance, both within and between natural turfgrass and synthetic turf surfaces. This research will quantify how variations in key surface metrics, including surface hardness, rotational resistance, soil moisture, thatch depth, and infill depth, affect athletes utilizing data from wearable technologies, such as STATSports GPS trackers and ankle IMUs. Additionally, to further understand the influence of field surfaces, athletes will be surveyed before and after performing drills to gather insights into their perceptions of how surface variability impacts their performance. Methodology Athletic Fields Tested This research was conducted in August of 2024, where four athletic fields on the Virginia Tech campus in Blacksburg, Virginia were studied. Two of these fields were natural turfgrass (bermudagrass), while the other two fields were synthetic turf. For both field types, one field was classified as ‘low usage', while the other was classified as ‘high usage'. This was determined based on traffic frequency, field age, and management practices. Preliminary Data Collection Before live athletes were introduced, surface hardness was assessed on all four fields using a Clegg hammer, with 100 measurements collected per field. The data were then analyzed using ArcGIS Pro to generate surface hardness heatmaps, highlighting variability between and within each field. These maps allowed us to identify specific locations for the athletes to perform drills, where one selected area within each field was slightly harder than the rest of the field, and the other being slightly softer. Additionally, 20 measurements of rotational resistance (using Deltec's rotational resistance tester), thatch depth (using a soil profile sampler), soil moisture (using a TDR 350 Soil Moisture Meter), and infill depth (using a Turf-Tec Professional Model Infill Depth Gauge) were taken in both the softer and harder areas to further characterize each field and understand the relationship between surface conditions and athlete performance. Data Collection During Athlete Involvement Fourteen female athletes participated in the study, equipped with STATSports GPS devices (to measure running speed) and ankle IMUs (to measure lower limb impact intensity) to quantify their movements during drills. The athletes were each given new Nike cleats prior to participation to eliminate variation based on cleat configuration. They completed three drills, including a drop landing or drop jump drill, a T-drill, and a modified acceleration-deceleration drill, which were designed to replicate common athletic movements. Each drill was performed three times in both the softer and harder areas identified within each field. Additionally, each athlete completed pre- and post-performance surveys designed to capture their perceptions of field quality before and after completing the drills, providing insight into how different surfaces may have influenced their performance. Results and Discussion Surface Hardness Data Heatmaps highlight surface hardness variability within each studied field. Surface hardness data (n = 100 per field) were analyzed using analysis of variance, and means were separated using Fisher's protected least significant difference (LSD) test at α = 0.05 to evaluate statistical differences between locations. Both synthetic turf fields had significantly harder surfaces than the natural turfgrass fields (p < 0.0001), and for both surface types, the high-usage field had a significantly harder surface than the low-usage field (p = 0.0029 for the natural turfgrass fields and p < 0.0001 for the synthetic turf fields). Both synthetic fields tested in this study were not constructed with a shock pad, which is typically placed beneath the layer of material that supports the synthetic fibers and utilized to help replicate the cushioning effect of natural turfgrass. The absence of a shock pad, along with the tendency of synthetic turf to harden over time due to infill material compaction from athlete foot traffic, may explain the harder surface values observed on the synthetic fields compared to the natural fields. Further, increased use or foot traffic on both natural turfgrass and synthetic turf leads to compaction, which causes the playing surface to harden over time. Therefore, it is anticipated that the high-usage fields exhibited higher surface hardness compared to the low-usage fields. Data Within Each Hard and Soft Area Resulting rotational resistance, thatch depth, soil moisture, and infill depth (synthetic fields only) measurements taken within each hard and soft area on all four fields are presented in Table 1 (available in the Spring 2026 issue of Pennsylvania Turfgrass magazine). These measurements (n = 20 per both hard and soft areas within each field) were analyzed using analysis of variance, and means were separated using Fisher's protected least significant difference (LSD) test at α = 0.05 to evaluate statistical differences between locations. Although the fields tested in this research were not professional-level fields, it is insightful to compare the results with the FIFA natural-pitch rating system (FIFA, 2022). All rotational resistance values fell within FIFA's ‘excellent quality' and ‘satisfactory quality' thresholds, which is important because excessive rotational resistance has been linked to increased lower extremity injuries due to the foot becoming entrapped in the surface during pivoting movements, and too little resistance can increase the risk of slipping. However, soil moisture values exceed 35%, which FIFA classifies as ‘unacceptable quality'. This elevated moisture is likely the primary cause of the low surface hardness values observed on the natural turfgrass fields, which were lower than FIFA's 70-85 Gmax ‘excellent quality' range. Additionally, FIFA considers thatch depths over 25 mm as unacceptable, and 10–15 mm satisfactory. Excessive thatch can cause athlete's cleats to become caught within the surface, increasing knee ligament stress. The low-usage natural turfgrass field had more thatch despite regular maintenance, while the high-usage natural turfgrass field had less, likely due to recent sprigging the summer before. Soft areas in both natural turfgrass fields exhibited higher thatch levels than the hard areas, consistent with previous findings that core cultivation reduces both thatch and surface hardness (McCarty et al., 2007; Atkinson et al., 2012). This supports the understanding that increased thatch can act as a cushioning layer, absorbing impact and thereby reducing surface hardness. The high-usage synthetic turf field exhibited significantly less infill and greater surface hardness compared to the low-usage synthetic turf field, and the soft areas within both synthetic fields had more infill than the hard areas. This aligns with previous research indicating that infill depth decreases with use, which in turn leads to higher surface hardness (Dickson et al., 2022). Additionally, the low-usage synthetic field exhibited greater variability in infill depth between the selected hard and soft areas, likely due to its relatively young age (only one year old at the time of the study). Compared to the older high-usage field, which was approximately ten years old, the infill in the low-usage synthetic field had less time to settle, making it more susceptible to displacement from foot traffic (Fleming et al., 2016). STATSports GPS Unit Data In our study, STATSports GPS units were securely attached to each athlete's upper back. These devices were used to determine if athlete running speed varied based on field type (natural turfgrass or synthetic turf), field usage level (high or low), or hardness (hard or soft areas within each field). However, no statistically significant differences were found. This consistency in speed across conditions is important because running speed can directly affect impact forces and biomechanical measurements. Prior studies have shown that faster running increases the ground reaction force and ultimately lower limb impact load (Leatham, 2004; Jiang et al., 2024). If athletes had run at different speeds on one field type compared to another, it could have affected the reliability of our ankle IMU data. However, since no significant speed differences were found across field types, usage, or hardness, we can confidently attribute the observed differences in the resulting ankle IMU data to the playing surface. Ankle IMU Data Ankle IMUs were utilized to record a metric called average intensity, which is defined as the mean impact intensity derived from every impact propagated into both limbs (IMeasureU, 2022). This metric is recorded in units of gravitational force (g). These devices were securely attached to each athlete's ankle and recorded data as they performed drills on all four fields studied. After running statistical tests that accounted for individual differences between athletes, significant differences were found based on field, field usage, and hardness. Across all three drills, field type had a noticeable impact (p < 0.0001) where athletes showed higher average intensity on synthetic turf fields compared to natural turfgrass. For the drop jump drill, the average intensity was 19.73 g [standard error (SE) ± 1.88] on natural turfgrass and 22.73 g (SE ± 1.82) on synthetic turf, placing the synthetic turf value within the IMU Step ‘high intensity' foot strike range of 21.5–26.7 g (Wong and Finch, 2018). A similar trend was seen in the t-drill, with average intensities of 15.84 g (SE ± 1.20) on natural turfgrass and 18.07 g (SE ± 1.16) on synthetic turf. For the modified acceleration-deceleration drill, average intensity was 17.72 g (SE ± 1.15) on natural turfgrass and 21.35 g (SE ± 1.10) on synthetic turf. Field usage also made a difference in the t-drill (p < 0.0001), where the average intensity on high-usage fields was 18.14 g (SE ± 1.24), compared to 16.49 g (SE ± 1.24) on low-usage fields. Hardness played a role as well, especially in the t-drill (p = 0.0073) and the modified acceleration-deceleration drill (p < 0.0001). In the t-drill, hard areas resulted in an average intensity of 17.43 g (SE ± 1.22), slightly higher than the 17.05 g (SE ± 1.22) on soft areas. For the modified acceleration-deceleration drill, intensity averaged 20.38 g (SE ± 4.28) on hard areas and 18.85 g (SE ± 3.81) on soft areas. Overall, the synthetic turf fields, high-usage fields, and hard areas within fields exhibited higher average intensity values than the natural turfgrass fields, low-usage fields, and softer areas within fields. This aligns with our surface hardness findings, as synthetic turf fields were significantly harder than natural turfgrass fields on average. Additionally, hard areas within synthetic turf were harder than those on natural turf, and high-usage fields were harder than low-usage fields for both surface types. Thus, our data suggest that harder surfaces may explain the higher average intensity values recorded on the athlete's lower limbs compared to softer surfaces. This trend has been heavily supported, as running on harder surfaces increases impact stress, which can ultimately contribute to lower limb injuries. However, all surface hardness values in this study were below 100 Gmax, which is the threshold deemed unsafe by the National Football League (NFL) guidelines (Sports Turf Managers Association, 2019) and unacceptable by FIFA. Yet, a potential positive correlation between surface hardness and impact was observed, as recorded by the ankle IMUs. While further research is needed, it is hypothesized that surface hardness exceeding 100 Gmax could significantly increase injury risk over time due to excessive impact on athletes' lower limbs. Additionally, establishing threshold values for ankle IMU metrics is crucial to determine the point at which these values may lead to injury. Survey / Athlete Perception Data Athletes completed pre- and post-performance surveys to assess field quality and its impact on their performance. Individual responses were recorded and analyzed using one-way analysis of variance to assess statistical differences between fields. Post-hoc comparisons were conducted using Fisher's protected least significant difference (LSD) test at α = 0.05. The low-usage natural turfgrass field received the highest quality rating for both pre- and post surveys, while the high-usage natural turfgrass field, hindered by weeds and poor maintenance, scored the lowest. Synthetic turf fields ranked in between the two natural fields (with the high usage synthetic turf field being ranked lower than the low-usage synthetic turf field), indicating a preference for synthetic surfaces over a poorly maintained natural field. Conclusions Considerable variation in surface hardness was observed both within and between fields, with synthetic turf fields generally being harder than natural turfgrass fields. High-usage fields, regardless of type, were significantly harder than low-usage fields. Other metrics, such as rotational resistance, soil moisture, thatch depth, and infill depth, also showed variability. For natural turfgrass fields, higher soil moisture led to lower surface hardness, while synthetic turf fields exhibited a negative relationship between field usage and infill depth, where frequent foot traffic reduced infill and increased surface hardness. Although achieving perfect field uniformity is not possible, these findings emphasize how field usage and maintenance impact surface variability. Additionally, our data suggest a potential link between surface hardness and the mechanical load on athletes' lower limbs. While this trend was observed, further research is needed to investigate its long-term effects on athlete health, particularly on surfaces that exceed acceptable hardness thresholds. Survey data revealed athletes rated the quality of the low-usage natural turfgrass field the highest, likely due to its softer surface and better aesthetics. In contrast, the high-usage natural turfgrass field, which suffered from poor maintenance and weed pressure, received the lowest ratings, underlining the importance of field condition in shaping athlete perceptions. These results highlight the role of field management and athlete feedback in optimizing field quality. Overall, this study offers valuable insights into how different sports surfaces impact athletes. Our findings suggest that harder surfaces, such as synthetic turf or high-traffic areas, can increase impact and loading on the lower limbs. These results highlight the critical importance of effective field management, maintenance, and consideration of field conditions prior to athletic competition. Next Phase of Research: Ph.D. Project Overview Building on the findings of the Virginia Tech study, this doctoral research at Penn State expands the investigation from impact loading to full lower-limb joint biomechanics during sport-specific movements. While the Virginia Tech study demonstrated that harder surfaces were associated with increased lower-limb impact intensity, the next question is whether different playing surfaces subtly alter how athletes move at the joint level during high-risk tasks such as cutting and decelerating. The planned Ph.D. project uses a multi-segment inertial measurement unit (IMU) configuration placed on the athlete's dominant limb, including sensors at the foot, shank, thigh, and pelvis. Positioning sensors closer to the ground improves sensitivity to surface-related differences, allowing evaluation of not only impact but also ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics derived through inverse kinematics workflows. Female athletes will perform sport-specific movements, including a single-leg drop-landing followed by a 90° cut, as well as an acceleration to deceleration drill, on four playing surface types: natural turfgrass, synthetic turf, carpet-type hybrid reinforced turfgrass, and stitched fiber hybrid reinforced turfgrass. Each athlete will complete multiple trials on each surface in a within-subject, repeated-measures design, allowing direct biomechanical comparisons across surface types. Female athletes are of particular interest given they experience substantially higher rates of non-contact ACL injury compared to their male counterparts, highlighting the importance of understanding how the playing surface may influence movement. Joint angles of interest include knee flexion and frontal-plane knee motion (dynamic valgus), as well as hip and foot orientation variables commonly discussed in the context of non-contact ACL injury mechanisms. Because hybrid systems are increasingly used in elite stadium environments and are required for upcoming international competitions (e.g., the FIFA World Cup), understanding how live athletes respond biomechanically to these surfaces is of particular interest. To date, most hybrid research has relied primarily on mechanical testing devices rather than human movement data. An additional component of the project involves comparing human biomechanical responses to mechanical surface testing metrics, including measurements from the fLEX testing device (Dickson and Sorochan, 2022; SGL System, n.d.). If consistent relationships are identified between device measurements and athlete joint mechanics, field managers may ultimately be able to more confidently use standardized mechanical testing tools as practical indicators of athlete–surface interactions. Collectively, this progression advances a more comprehensive framework that integrates both the playing surface and athlete biomechanics. By focusing on human movement responses within real field environments, this work strengthens interdisciplinary collaboration across field management, kinesiology, and sports medicine. Ultimately, it aims to generate practical knowledge that supports both performance and safety in sport. A full list of references as well as accompanying figures, photos and tables are available with this article in the Spring 2026 issue of Pennsylvania Turfgrass magazine available on www.TheTurfZone.com. You have been listening to The Turf Zone Podcast. Follow The Turf Zone on X, Facebook and LinkedIn for all things turfgrass, featuring podcasts, magazines, events and more. The post How Variability Within and Between Natural Turfgrass and Synthetic Athletic Fields Impacts Athlete Safety and Performance appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Rassegna stampa economico-finanziaria del 12 Giugno 2026, strutturata per macro-temi e basata sulle principali testate giornalistiche nazionali.BCE: TASSI SU DELLO 0,25%(Corriere / Repubblica / Stampa / Sole 24 Ore / Fatto / Messaggero)• Prima stretta dal settembre 2023, decisione unanime: depositi al 2,25%, rifinanziamento al 2,40%, prestiti marginali al 2,65% dal 17 giugno.• Inflazione attesa: 3% nel 2026 nello scenario base (era 2,6%), fino al 4% nel 2026 e 5,3% nel 2027 nello scenario grave (petrolio a 122 $). Crescita eurozona rivista allo 0,8%; FMI taglia a +0,9%.• Mercati invariati: secondo rialzo già prezzato a settembre (forse luglio). Critici Giorgetti («speriamo non ce ne siano altri»), Tajani e Orsini; per Trichet invece «la BCE doveva dare un segnale».CREDITO E RISPARMIO: RINCARI CONTENUTI, MERCATO SOLIDO(Corriere / Repubblica / Messaggero)• Mutui variabili: +59-70 €/mese ogni 100 mila € di debito (FABI); su mutuo standard da 126 mila € la rata sale di circa 16 €, da 590 a 606 €. Euribor 3M al 2,40%, Eurirs 20Y al 3,3%.• Il credito tiene: prestiti al privato +2,8% (Bankitalia), TAEG nuovi mutui al 3,91%, mercato italiano (oltre 400 mld €) tra i più competitivi UE. Domanda in rotazione verso il tasso fisso.• Lato risparmio: BTP brevi al 2,66-2,91%, quinquennale al 3,21%, conti deposito sopra il 3,6% lordo. Inflazione Italia al 3,2% a maggio.RISIKO BANCARIO: ASSE INTESA-UNIPOL SU MPS(Repubblica / Stampa / Italia Oggi / MF / Espresso)• Cimbri in Parlamento: Opas Intesa da 30,6 mld € «non improvvisata»; a Unipol 635 filiali + marchio MPS, da fondere in Bper. Chiusura attesa entro fine anno (circa 6 mesi di iter BCE).• Generali «resta un concorrente»: il 13,1% del Leone passerà a Intesa senza cambiare i rapporti.• Banco Bpm studia la controfferta: servono 32-33 mld €. Titolo MPS già a sconto del 3,4% sull'offerta: il mercato scommette su un rilancio. Possibile ingresso di Crédit Agricole.ENERGIA: PETROLIO SOTTO CONTROLLO NONOSTANTE HORMUZ(Corriere / Stampa / Espresso)• Stretto chiuso da 100 giorni (-20% offerta globale), ma Brent a 90,7 $ contro i 150-200 $ previsti a marzo: 2 miliardi di persone nei Paesi poveri hanno tagliato la domanda di 2,5 milioni di barili/giorno; sauditi ed Emirati recuperano 7 dei 20 milioni di barili via oleodotti.• Ribera (Commissione UE): «l'Italia è troppo dipendente dal gas, le rinnovabili sono una necessità».FISCO: ROTTAMAZIONE, PATRIMONIALE, RISORSE UE(Avvenire / Libero / MF)• Primo sì al decreto accise-ter: rottamazione tributi locali (IMU, TARI, multe) con adesione entro il 31 luglio; conversione entro il 29 giugno. Promemoria: acconto IMU il 16 giugno (circa 22-23 mld € di gettito annuo).• Dibattito patrimoniale nel campo largo, ma le imposte patrimoniali esistenti valgono già circa 40 mld €/anno (Confedilizia).• Superbonus: maxi-frode da 560 mln € sequestrati (60 società cartiere); 7,5 mld di irregolarità intercettate in 6 anni.• Al Consiglio UE del 18-19 giugno prima discussione su bilancio 2028-34: sul tavolo anche tassa sulle cripto e digital tax. Italia al vertice NATO con il 2,8% del PIL in difesa.IMPRESE E INVESTIMENTI: L'ITALIA SOVRAPERFORMA(Sole 24 Ore / Verità / MF / Repubblica / Espresso)• Studio KKR (758 mld $ gestiti): Italia tra i mercati europei che sovraperformano, destinataria di flussi su difesa, energia e reti. Spesa militare globale record: 2.630 mld $.• Parte l'iperammortamento («overboost» per Orsini); Transizione 5.0 da 9,8 mld € fino a settembre 2028 estesa alle imprese culturali (settore da 61 mld di fatturato).• Data center: richieste di rete oltre 84 GW, oltre il 50% dei progetti in Lombardia, che vara una legge ad hoc.• AlmaLaurea: occupazione laureati al top da 15 anni (94,4% a 5 anni dalla magistrale), ma stipendi fino al -60% rispetto all'estero (1.840 € vs 2.941 €).• Euro digitale: voto UE il 23 giugno, test nel 2027-28, circolazione entro metà 2029.
In questa puntata partiamo dalle rottamazioni locali, con molti Comuni pronti a riaprire la sanatoria su Imu, Tari, multe e altri debiti; ci spostiamo sulla salute mentale a scuola, con il nuovo servizio “AscoltaMi” che offrirà agli studenti cinque incontri online di supporto psicologico; chiudiamo con la sindrome del QT lungo, una malattia genetica del cuore su cui una nuova ricerca apre la strada a diagnosi più precise e prevenzione personalizzata. Se vuoi dirmi le difficoltà e le sfide che incontri nella tua vita quotidiana o, semplicemente, la tua opinione sulle notizie di oggi, scrivimi in DM su Instagram, mi trovi come Angelica Migliorisi. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Nakamas
In this episode, The Crew is joined by Stump to chat all things 12th Anniversary! Discussing their thoughts on Luffy, Buggy, Blackbeard, Shanks and the unexpected Imu releases. They also chat about Duel and what might be coming next!Shout-out to Stump for joining us on today's episode!● Stump Twitter: https://x.com/stump_d_gatcha● Stump Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@stump.dFor details about future uploads and if you want to keep up to date with the hosts on the show, please follow our social media;Good, Great, Perfect Socials: https://linktr.ee/GoodGreatPerfect------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Good, Great, Perfect Podcast discusses all things ONE PIECE Treasure Cruise and beyond, and we thank you for watching/listening to this podcast.GGP Crew:- Captain Papi Twitter: https://twitter.com/captainpapii- Toadskii Twitter: https://twitter.com/Toadskii- Nitemare Twitter: https://twitter.com/nitemarejp- Flamevious Twitter: https://twitter.com/Villainueva__#OPTC #TreCru
Rassegna stampa economico-finanziaria del 16 Maggio 2026, strutturata per macro-temi e basata sulle principali testate giornalistiche nazionali. Investimenti e MercatiTestate: Repubblica / La Stampa / Il Sole 24 Ore / Avvenire / Milano Finanza* Inflazione e debito tornano al centro del rischio Italia. L'inflazione italiana sale ad aprile al 2,7%, dall'1,7% di marzo, ai massimi da settembre 2023. Il debito pubblico tocca un nuovo record a 3.159 miliardi, con un incremento mensile di 19,5 miliardi. S&P conferma il rating dell'Italia a BBB+ con outlook positivo, ma il messaggio è chiaro: la tenuta dei conti resta centrale.* Mercati sotto pressione tra energia, tassi e tech. Le tensioni geopolitiche spingono il WTI oltre 105 dollari e alimentano vendite su Borse, titoli di Stato e tecnologia. La BCE mantiene un'impostazione prudente: crescita dell'Eurozona stimata allo 0,1% nel primo trimestre 2026, inflazione area euro al 3,0%, tassi ancora al 3,9%.* Allarme bolla AI. Stiglitz segnala una possibile sopravvalutazione del Nasdaq fino al 50%, concentrata su poche società tecnologiche e sull'intelligenza artificiale. Lettura utile per gli investitori: il trend resta strategico, ma la selezione dei titoli diventa decisiva.Industria, Imprese e Golden PowerTestate: Il Sole 24 Ore / Milano Finanza* Golden power sempre più rilevante. Nel 2025 risultano 903 operazioni segnalate, 26 approvate con prescrizioni e 2 vietate. Il tema non è solo difensivo: la normativa diventa una variabile strutturale per M&A, private equity, industria strategica e investimenti esteri.* Caso Ferretti-KKCG sotto osservazione. Il governo valuta la richiesta di golden power avanzata dal socio KKCG. Il dossier conferma che nautica, manifattura avanzata e asset industriali italiani restano al centro dell'attenzione strategica.* Difesa: EDGE pronta a investire in Italia. Milano Finanza segnala un piano da 3 miliardi di euro del gruppo emiratino EDGE. Indicazione positiva: la difesa si conferma uno dei settori con maggiore capacità di attrarre capitali esteri, tecnologia e partnership industriali.Fisco, Normativa e Capitale UmanoTestate: Il Sole 24 Ore / Repubblica / Moneta* Concordato preventivo 2026-2027 in fase di test. Il Sole 24 Ore evidenzia i primi passaggi operativi in attesa delle modifiche al decreto fiscale. Tema chiave per imprese e professionisti: prevedibilità fiscale e compliance diventano leve competitive.* Rientro dei cervelli: bonus non rafforzati. Repubblica segnala il mancato aumento degli incentivi per chi rientra in Italia. Tra i KPI: detassazione ridotta rispetto al passato e beneficio ordinario su 5 anni, estendibile a 10 anni in casi specifici come acquisto casa o figli. Criticità: il Paese rischia di perdere competenze qualificate proprio mentre imprese e PA cercano profili ad alta produttività.* Casa e affitti: richiesta di IMU più leggera. Moneta affronta il tema degli sfratti rapidi e degli incentivi fiscali per chi affitta. Indicazione positiva: una fiscalità più equilibrata sugli immobili potrebbe aumentare l'offerta abitativa e ridurre tensioni sui canoni.Consumi, Prezzi e Potere d'AcquistoTestate: Repubblica / La Stampa* Il carrello alimentare resta sotto pressione. La Repubblica evidenzia rincari molto rilevanti.* Effetto business: margini sotto stress nella filiera food. La Stampa parla di costi triplicati su alcune produzioni. Per imprese e distribuzione il nodo è duplice: preservare margini e non scaricare integralmente gli aumenti sul consumatore finale.Energia e Geopolitica EconomicaTestate: Il Sole 24 Ore / Corriere della Sera / Repubblica / La Stampa / Il Messaggero* Hormuz e Medio Oriente impattano direttamente sui mercati. Le tensioni nell'area spingono energia, trasporti e aspettative d'inflazione. Il rischio principale è la trasmissione dei costi energetici a beni industriali, logistica e consumi.* Europa-Golfo: energia, difesa e infrastrutture. Il Sole 24 Ore segnala la missione di Meloni allo Europe Gulf Forum. Focus su energia, investimenti, difesa, infrastrutture e corridoio IMEC, con Trieste e Adriatico candidati a diventare hub logistici tra Asia ed Europa.* Biocarburanti come opportunità europea. Il Sole 24 Ore legge i biocarburanti come leva industriale e strategica. Indicazione positiva: l'Europa può ridurre dipendenze energetiche, sostenere filiere agricole-industriali e accelerare la transizione senza indebolire la competitività.Lavoro, Welfare e DemografiaTestate: Corriere della Sera / Il Foglio – Inserto* Longevità e sanità: costo sociale crescente. Il Corriere evidenzia il tema dell'invecchiamento: più anni di vita, ma non sempre in buona salute. Per imprese e policy maker il punto è la sostenibilità del welfare e la prevenzione come investimento produttivo.* Industria senza operai: rischio strutturale. Il Foglio richiama la scomparsa progressiva di competenze manuali e tecniche. Indicazione positiva: formazione professionale, ITS e riqualificazione possono diventare una leva concreta di produttività.
Rassegna stampa economico-finanziaria del 15 Maggio 2026, strutturata per macro-temi e basata sulle principali testate giornalistiche nazionali. Investimenti, Mercati e FinanzaTestate: Il Sole 24 Ore / MF / La Stampa / Corriere della Sera / Repubblica* Consob ancora senza vertice. La nomina del presidente resta bloccata dopo un nuovo nulla di fatto nella maggioranza. Il tema è rilevante perché riguarda la governance del mercato finanziario italiano e la credibilità delle authority in una fase di forte volatilità regolatoria.* EGM: 207 società quotate e 11 miliardi di capitalizzazione. MF fotografa un mercato alternativo ancora vitale, utile per Pmi e scale-up che cercano capitale senza passare dai circuiti tradizionali. Il dato positivo è che esiste ancora una piattaforma domestica per accompagnare crescita, passaggi generazionali e internazionalizzazione.* Criptovalute: primo stop italiano e sequestro milionario a Coinbase. La Stampa segnala un intervento che conferma l'inasprimento della vigilanza sugli operatori crypto. Per gli investitori istituzionali il messaggio è chiaro: il settore resta interessante, ma solo con presìdi di compliance robusti.* Monete digitali private sotto osservazione. Il Sole 24 Ore richiama i rischi sistemici legati a stablecoin e strumenti digitali non pienamente regolati. Il lato positivo è che la regolamentazione può rafforzare la fiducia degli investitori e aprire spazio a operatori più solidi.Banche, Credito e ImpreseTestate: Il Sole 24 Ore / MF / Corriere della Sera / Repubblica* Da Simest 4,3 miliardi in 3 mesi. MF evidenzia un'accelerazione degli strumenti a supporto dell'export e dell'internazionalizzazione. È un segnale favorevole per le imprese italiane: liquidità, garanzie e finanza agevolata restano leve centrali per presidiare mercati esteri complessi.* Demanio: patrimonio da 63 miliardi e 5 miliardi da investire. Il Sole 24 Ore segnala il potenziale economico del patrimonio pubblico. La valorizzazione degli asset immobiliari dello Stato può diventare una leva di investimento, rigenerazione urbana e collaborazione pubblico-privato.* Authority e nomine: Consob, Antitrust e Rai in stallo. Più testate riportano tensioni sulle nomine pubbliche. Per il mondo economico il punto non è solo politico: la stabilità delle autorità indipendenti incide direttamente su mercati, concorrenza e fiducia degli operatori.Fisco, Normativa e CasaTestate: Il Sole 24 Ore / Corriere della Sera / La Stampa* Rottamazione estesa anche alle multe. Il Corriere segnala che nel decreto fiscale entra anche il tema delle sanzioni amministrative. Il valore complessivo della rottamazione viene indicato in 48 miliardi. Il beneficio potenziale è una maggiore capacità di recupero crediti per gli enti, ma resta il rischio di stratificare nuove sanatorie.* IMU, Tari e multe: doppie sanatorie locali. Il Sole 24 Ore descrive un quadro fiscale frammentato, con enti locali chiamati a gestire regole non sempre lineari. Per famiglie e imprese la priorità resta la certezza delle scadenze e dei perimetri applicativi.* Concordato preventivo: nel mirino 1,4 milioni di partite IVA considerate inaffidabili. Il Sole 24 Ore segnala una stretta selettiva sul rapporto tra Fisco e autonomi. Il dato è rilevante perché può spingere verso maggiore trasparenza, ma richiede attenzione per non penalizzare chi ha anomalie formali e non evasive.* Piano casa: previsto un maxi bonus di volumetria per gli interventi privati. La misura può attivare investimenti edilizi senza replicare gli eccessi del Superbonus. Il punto positivo è la possibilità di mobilitare capitale privato, riqualificazione urbana e offerta abitativa.Industria, Export e DifesaTestate: MF / La Verità / Il Foglio / La Stampa / Corriere della Sera* Export di armi italiane a 9 miliardi: Leonardo domina. MF segnala una forte crescita del comparto difesa. È un settore sempre più strategico, sia per ragioni geopolitiche sia industriali: alta tecnologia, occupazione qualificata e filiere nazionali diventano asset competitivi.* La finanza investe nel defence tech italiano. La Verità evidenzia l'interesse crescente dei capitali privati verso tecnologie dual use, sicurezza, spazio, cyber e difesa. Il dato positivo è la nascita di un ecosistema dove startup, industria e finanza possono convergere.* Ferretti: cambio di governance e crescente peso cinese. La Verità e Il Tempo leggono il dossier come caso simbolico di presidio estero su un marchio industriale italiano. Il rischio è la perdita di controllo strategico; l'opportunità è rafforzare strumenti nazionali per proteggere competenze e filiere pregiate.* Electrolux e industria europea. La Verità segnala il tema della tenuta occupazionale e competitiva. Il nodo resta il costo industriale europeo: energia, regolazione e concorrenza internazionale. In positivo, la crisi può accelerare politiche industriali più pragmatiche.Energia e GeopoliticaTestate: Corriere della Sera / Repubblica / Il Sole 24 Ore / Domani / Il Foglio / Il Giornale* Gasdotto Nigeria-Marocco-Europa: piano da 25 miliardi. Il Sole 24 Ore segnala un progetto infrastrutturale di grande scala. Per l'Europa è una potenziale leva di diversificazione energetica, utile a ridurre dipendenze e vulnerabilità.* Hormuz sotto pressione: altre due navi colpite. Corriere, Repubblica e altre testate descrivono l'escalation nello Stretto. L'impatto economico è diretto su energia, trasporti e premi assicurativi. La possibile intesa con Teheran viene letta come tentativo di stabilizzazione.* USA-Cina: accordi su carne, Boeing e chip, ma Taiwan resta il nodo. Repubblica e Il Giornale riportano aperture commerciali, inclusa la partita sugli aerei Boeing e sui semiconduttori. Il messaggio per le imprese è duplice: qualche spazio di normalizzazione c'è, ma la catena tecnologica resta terreno di scontro.* Draghi: Europa sola, servono impegni comuni sulla difesa. Corriere, Repubblica, Messaggero, Domani e Foglio convergono sul messaggio dell'ex premier. Per il business europeo significa più spesa comune, più industria continentale, più coordinamento strategico.Lavoro, Formazione e Capitale UmanoTestate: Repubblica / Il Sole 24 Ore / Il Foglio / Espresso* Bonus assunzioni sempre meno utilizzati. Repubblica segnala un calo dell'efficacia degli incentivi al lavoro. Il tema centrale è che il mercato non si sblocca solo con bonus: servono competenze, formazione e semplificazione.* Medicina: l'80% degli aspiranti resta nel sistema universitario. Il Sole 24 Ore evidenzia un dato positivo sul capitale umano sanitario. La sfida è trasformare l'accesso in percorsi formativi sostenibili, con effetti di lungo periodo su sanità e occupazione qualificata.* IA a scuola: insegnarla per governarla. L'Espresso porta il tema dell'intelligenza artificiale nella formazione. È una priorità economica, non solo educativa: alfabetizzazione digitale e competenze AI saranno decisive per produttività e competitività.
Rassegna stampa economico-finanziaria del 14 Maggio 2026, strutturata per macro-temi e basata sulle principali testate giornalistiche nazionali. Investimenti, Mercati e BancheTestate: Corriere della Sera / Repubblica / Il Fatto Quotidiano / Domani / MF* Consob, Freni rinuncia: la partita per la presidenza si riapre dopo le tensioni nella maggioranza. Il tema è rilevante per i mercati perché riguarda la guida dell'autorità di vigilanza su risparmio, società quotate e intermediari.* Mps-Mediobanca-Generali: il dossier bancario resta centrale. Il Corriere riporta l'intervista a Caltagirone con il messaggio “Mps non venda le Generali”, mentre Repubblica segnala sequestri di pc e telefono al banchiere Nattino nell'ambito della scalata Mps-Mediobanca.* BRI e Panetta: MF sostiene la candidatura di Fabio Panetta alla guida della “superbanca centrale”, tema di peso per la rappresentanza italiana nelle istituzioni finanziarie globali.* MFE: MF segnala un miglioramento della marginalità, indicatore positivo per il gruppo media e per il comparto quotato italiano.Fisco, Tasse e NormativaTestate: Corriere della Sera / Repubblica / Il Messaggero / Il Sole 24 Ore / Il Foglio / La Notizia* Rottamazione quinquies: Il Sole 24 Ore parla di sanatoria per Imu, Tari e multe, con domande entro ottobre. Repubblica e Messaggero confermano l'estensione anche alle multe.* Concordato e pagamenti PA: Il Sole 24 Ore segnala più tempo per il concordato e un allentamento della stretta sui pagamenti della Pubblica amministrazione.* Tasse e salari: il confronto politico ruota su riduzione fiscale, salari e sostenibilità dei conti. Il nodo resta la crescita: Il Foglio sottolinea che il dibattito su deficit e Superbonus rischia di oscurare il tema produttività.Energia, Geopolitica e Materie PrimeTestate: Corriere della Sera / La Stampa / Il Messaggero / Il Giornale / Il Tempo / Il Foglio / Riformista / Avvenire* Petrolio e Hormuz: più testate segnalano tensione sulle scorte e sullo Stretto di Hormuz. Il rischio è un impatto su energia, inflazione e costi industriali.* Nucleare e rinnovabili: il tema torna nell'agenda economica. Avvenire intervista Baldassarri sul ritorno al nucleare in Europa; Il Messaggero cita il piano su nucleare e Zes unica; il Corriere riporta l'annuncio di una legge sul nucleare entro l'estate.* Terre rare e Cina: Il Messaggero evidenzia la leva cinese sulle terre rare, mentre La Verità e MF seguono il caso Ferretti e l'ipotesi di uno “scudo” italiano dopo il blitz cinese.* Usa-Cina: diversi articoli descrivono un equilibrio competitivo ma necessario. Per le imprese italiane il punto positivo è la possibilità di presidiare filiere alternative e rafforzare autonomia strategica europea.Industria, Imprese e Made in ItalyTestate: Il Sole 24 Ore / Domani / La Verità / MF / La Stampa* Industria italiana: Il Sole 24 Ore valorizza “varietà e flessibilità” come asset competitivo del sistema produttivo nazionale.* Electrolux: Domani parla di nuovo caso industriale critico, segnalando vulnerabilità nelle politiche di attrazione e difesa della manifattura.* Ferretti: il dossier è strategico perché unisce lusso, nautica, controllo societario e interesse cinese. Per il Made in Italy è un test sulla capacità di proteggere asset industriali senza chiudersi agli investimenti esteri.* Consip e AI: Il Sole 24 Ore segnala tempi di gara ridotti del 60% grazie all'intelligenza artificiale: dato positivo per efficienza pubblica, procurement e velocità degli investimenti.Lavoro, Famiglie e PrevidenzaTestate: La Stampa / MF / Il Tempo / Corriere della Sera / La Notizia* Salari bassi e giovani: La Stampa intervista Rosina sul tema salari, inflazione e prospettive dei giovani che restano in Italia.* Fondi pensione: MF richiama il piano Meloni sui fondi pensione: tema chiave per canalizzare risparmio privato verso economia reale e infrastrutture.* Energia e famiglie: MF riporta la linea Giorgetti: prima energia e famiglie rispetto al riarmo. Il messaggio è prudenziale, ma positivo per consumi e stabilità sociale.* Casa, lavoro, energia: Il Tempo inserisce questi pilastri nella rotta di governo verso il 2027.
Nakamas
Nakamas
One Piece chapter 1181 is here, and this week we discuss the ongoing fight between Loki and Imu. We also talk about the fact that Imu was laughing with JoyBoy in the past and what this could mean for the story going forward.
Nakamas
Kashin Koji explains how he's not too powerful, Kiyoshi's fight against Bobo hits a climax, and Imu looks a little bit doofy! 3:29 - Ichi the Witch 79 15:04 - Blue Box 239 24:06 - Boruto: Two Blue Vortex 33 39:17 - Class 2-B Hero Destroyerz 1 51:27 - Drawn to the Fire 2 1:00:41 / 60:41 - Hima-Ten! 87 1:07:19 / 67:19 - Kinato's Magic 12 1:12:33 / 72:33 - Roku's House of Oddities 3 1:19:48 / 79:48 - Someone Hertz 30 1:28:36 / 88:36 - Ultimate Exorcist Kiyoshi 89 1:35:27 / 95:27 - Marriagetoxin 161 1:40:15 / 100:15 - Nue's Exorcist 142 1:44:07 / 104:07 - Akane-banashi 203 1:50:36 / 110:36 - One Piece 1180 1:58:59 / 118:59 - Favorite Series and MVP
One Piece chapter 1180 is here and this week we talk all about Imu coming to Elbaph and dismantling every character. We also discuss Loki's return and what it could mean for the rest of the arc.
In this episode, we react to One Piece chapter 1179 and the massive reveal surrounding Imu.We break down what this means for the story moving forward, while Rico and Ty share new theories — including a shocking possibility that the Straw Hat Pirates could lose a member.
One Piece chapter 1179 is here and this week we're joined by Billy again to talk all things Imu! Imu is here in the flesh and were are excited but very concerned.
One Piece chapter 1177 is here and this week we talk about Usopp taking on Imu themselves and not crying or running! We also discuss the final panel and whether or not Imu is reffering to ragnarok and Loki Destroying the Tree.
PTs are expected to be the movement experts—yet most movement assessment is still subjective: “knee valgus noted,” “pelvic drop,” “looks better.” Dan Seidler (Business Development Lead, DorsaVi USA) and Maka Lange unpack what changes when clinics can quantify biomechanics with video AI and wearable sensors.They cover how objective data improves patient education and buy-in, strengthens documentation, and makes return-to-play/return-to-work decisions more defensible—especially as AI, wearables, and non-PT competitors raise the bar for “measured” care.What you'll learnWhy “eyeballing” biomechanics breaks down across cliniciansHow objective data can improve patient buy-in and clarityThe difference between quick video AI assessments vs IMU sensor “gold standard” testingHow standardized movement reports can help documentation and communicationUse cases: mass athlete screenings, surgeon referrals, workplace safety, workers' comp/FCEs, and early pelvic health biofeedback workGuest + LinksDorsaVi: http://www.dorsavi.com/
One Piece chapter 1175 is out now and this week we talk about literally how cool Loki is and how awesome his Niddhoggr form is. we also discuss how on earth Imu could POSSIBLY know Niddhogger.
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into post-injury rehabilitation is transforming recovery paradigms by enabling personalized, adaptive, and efficient rehabilitation pathways tailored to individual patient needs. This podcast reviews the current advances in AI applications that facilitate assessment, monitoring, and optimization of rehabilitation programs following injuries. Through machine learning algorithms, wearable sensors, and predictive analytics, AI enhances the precision of therapy plans, tracks patient progress in real-time, and predicts recovery trajectories. The discussion includes the benefits of AI-driven rehabilitation, including improved functional outcomes, reduced recovery times, and increased patient engagement. It also addresses challenges such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and integration with clinical workflows. 1. Transforming recovery paradigms Traditional post‑injury rehab relies on periodic in‑person assessments, therapist intuition, and standardized protocols that only partially account for individual variability. AI is shifting this model toward: Continuous, data‑driven care: Instead of snapshots in clinic, rehab can be informed by near real‑time streams of kinematic, physiological, and behavioral data from wearables, smart devices, and robot interfaces. Dynamic adaptation: Therapy intensity, task difficulty, and exercise selection can be automatically adjusted based on ongoing performance, fatigue, and recovery trends, rather than fixed schedules. Precision rehabilitation: Algorithms can identify which patients are likely to respond to specific interventions (e.g., constraint‑induced movement therapy vs robotics) and tailor plans accordingly. This moves rehabilitation from a "one‑size‑fits‑many" paradigm toward precision, context‑aware therapy, analogous to precision oncology but focused on function and participation. 2. Assessment, monitoring, and optimization AI for assessment Sensor‑based movement analysis: Machine learning models process accelerometer, IMU, EMG, and pressure data to quantify gait symmetry, joint kinematics, balance, and fine motor control with higher resolution than visual observation alone. Automated scoring: AI can approximate or support standardized scales (e.g., Fugl‑Meyer, Berg Balance Scale) by mapping sensor features or video-derived pose estimates to clinical scores, reducing inter‑rater variability and saving clinician time. Continuous monitoring Home and community tracking: Wearable and ambient sensors enable monitoring of daily steps, walking speed, arm use, posture, and adherence to exercises outside the clinic, feeding rich longitudinal datasets into AI models. Real‑time alerts: Algorithms can detect abnormal patterns—such as increased fall risk, reduced limb use, or signs of over‑exertion—and flag the clinician or adjust digital therapy content automatically. Optimization and decision support Predictive models: Using historical data, AI can forecast functional gains, plateau points, or risk of complications (e.g., falls, readmission), supporting individualized goal‑setting and resource allocation. Reinforcement learning and "digital twins": Emerging work in neurorehabilitation treats rehab as a sequential decision problem, using model‑based reinforcement learning and patient "digital twins" to recommend optimal timing, dosing, and progression of interventions over weeks to months. 3. Technologies: ML, wearables, analytics Machine learning algorithms: Supervised ML classifies movement quality (normal vs compensatory), detects exercise type from sensor streams, and estimates clinical scores. Unsupervised learning clusters patients into phenotypes (e.g., gait patterns after stroke), revealing subgroups that respond differently to certain therapies. Reinforcement learning and contextual bandits explore which therapy adjustments yield the best long‑term functional outcomes for a given individual. Wearable sensors and robotics: Inertial sensors, EMG, pressure insoles, and exoskeleton sensors capture high‑frequency movement and muscle activity data during training. Robotic devices (upper‑limb exoskeletons, gait trainers) coupled with AI can modulate assistance, resistance, or task difficulty in real time based on performance and predicted fatigue. Predictive and prescriptive analytics: Predictive analytics estimate trajectories (e.g., time to independent walking, expected upper‑limb function) to inform shared decisions with patients and families. Prescriptive analytics recommend therapy intensity, modality mix, and scheduling to maximize functional gains under resource constraints. 4. Benefits: outcomes, efficiency, engagement Improved functional outcomes: Studies report better motor recovery, gait quality, and ADL performance when AI‑assisted training is used—especially when robotics and intelligent feedback are involved. Reduced recovery time and resource use: More precise dosing and earlier identification of non‑responders can reduce ineffective sessions, shorten time to key milestones, and support safe earlier discharge with robust remote follow‑up. Increased adherence and engagement: AI‑driven digital rehab platforms use gamification, adaptive difficulty, and personalized feedback to keep patients engaged in home programs, improving adherence compared to static paper instructions. Support for clinicians: Instead of replacing therapists, AI can offload repetitive measurement tasks, highlight concerning trends, and offer data‑driven suggestions, allowing clinicians to focus on relational, motivational, and complex decision‑making aspects of care. 5. Challenges and ethical considerations Data privacy and security: Rehab AI often relies on continuous collection of sensitive motion, physiological, and sometimes audio/video data, raising questions about consent, storage, secondary use, and breach risk. Approaches like federated learning and on‑device processing are being explored to reduce centralization of identifiable data while still enabling model training. Algorithmic bias and fairness: If training data under‑represent older adults, women, certain racial/ethnic groups, or people with severe disability, AI models may misestimate performance or risk for those groups, potentially widening disparities in rehab access and outcomes. Ongoing auditing, diverse datasets, and participatory design with patients and clinicians are needed to ensure equitable performance. Integration with clinical workflows: Many AI tools are developed in research settings and are not yet seamlessly integrated into EHRs, scheduling systems, or therapist documentation workflows. Poorly integrated tools risk adding documentation burden or "alert fatigue," reducing adoption. Successful implementations co‑design interfaces with frontline therapists and physicians. Regulation, liability, and trust: It remains unclear in many jurisdictions how to regulate adaptive rehab algorithms (as medical devices, clinical decision support, or wellness tools) and who is liable when AI‑informed plans cause harm. Transparent, explainable models and clear communication to patients about the role of AI are critical for maintaining trust. 6. Case studies and emerging trends Remote and hybrid digital rehabilitation: AI‑driven platforms providing home‑based stroke, orthopedic, or Parkinson's rehab with clinician dashboards are improving adherence and extending care beyond brick‑and‑mortar clinics. Collaborative AI for precision neurorehabilitation: Frameworks combining patient‑clinician goal setting, digital twins, and reinforcement learning exemplify "collaborative AI" that augments rather than replaces therapists. Multimodal personalization: Integration of movement data, EMG, heart rate, sleep, and self‑reported pain/fatigue is enabling more nuanced adaptation to daily fluctuations in capacity. Conversational AI for education and coaching: Early work is assessing tools like ChatGPT as low‑risk supports for exercise education and motivation, though they are not yet precise enough to replace professional plan design AI is moving rehab toward patient‑centered, continuously adapting, and data‑rich care, but realizing this promise depends on addressing privacy, bias, workflow, and regulatory challenges in partnership with clinicians and patients.