Podcasts about mgr

Vypočujte si záznam z diskusie o perimenopauze a menopauze. Čo sa deje s telom ženy počas prechodu? Čo spraviť, aby druhá najradikálnejšia hormonálna búrka v našich telách od puberty nenapáchala nezvratné škody, ale naopak, osviežila prežívanie obdobia, v ktorom dokázateľne môžeme byť na vrchole našich síl?   O tom, ako si užiť naše najlepšie roky diskutovali farmaceutka a zakladateľka portálu www.vsetkoomenopauze.sk PharmDr. Leila Zajac, gynekologička a pôrodníčka Doc. MUDr. Alexandra Krištúfková, PhD, diskusiu moderovala psychologička a terapeutka Mgr. Marcela Hrapková (www.novapsychologia.sk)

Zveme vás k poslechu vydání našeho pořadu Na stole je téma, ve kterém se ohlédneme za letošní Nocí kostelů 2025. Redaktorka Tamara Suchánková přivítá hosta Mgr. Davida Mikšu, diecézního koordinátora Arcibiskupství olomouckého, který nám přiblíží zákulisí této významné události, její průběh i nevšední programy. Připojte se k nám a zažijte ohlédnutí za letošní Nocí kostelů plné inspirace, zajímavostí a hlubších pohledů na duchovní život.

Jeden Monat neue Klamotten für wenig Geld – klingt verlockend, aber was steckt eigentlich hinter den niedrigen Preisen? Wie schadet unser Kaufverhalten der Umwelt und den Menschen, die unsere Kleidung herstellen? Und was tun, wenn man wenig Geld hat, aber trotzdem stylisch und nachhaltig unterwegs sein will? Gemeinsam mit Jugendlichen und Expertinnen liefert Jana Antworten in dieser Folge von neuneinhalb.

Tajemství úspěchu rybaření v horkých dnech nám prozradí host Světa zvířat Mgr.Jan Skalský, tiskový mluvčí Českého rybářského svazu. Ptejte se i vy na to, co vás zajímá. Telefon do studia je 475 212 212. Své dotazy můžete psát na email: host@sever.rozhlas.cz. Moderuje Dagmar Cestrová.

•⁠ ⁠“உனக்கு அறிவிருக்கா? கேமராவ பிடுங்கி எறியுறேன்” - வைகோ•⁠ ⁠மல்லை சத்யாவை தம்பியை போல நினைத்தேன் ஆனா... மனம் நொந்து பேசிய வைகோ!•⁠ ⁠“வைகோவின் உயிரை 3 முறை காப்பாற்றியவன் நான் - மல்லை சத்யா•⁠ ⁠தேர்தல் ஆணையத்திற்கு ராமதாஸ் கடிதம்!•⁠ ⁠செயற்குழு செல்லாது' - அன்புமணி ராமதாஸ் தரப்பு டெல்லி பயணம்•⁠ ⁠மூத்த மகள் காந்திமதிக்கு பாமகவில் பொறுப்பு..? ராமதாஸ் பதில்•⁠ ⁠முதலமைச்சர் மு.க.ஸ்டாலின் அறிவிப்புக்கு பாமக நிறுவனர் ராமதாஸ் வரவேற்பு!•⁠ ⁠"பாஜகவின் டப்பிங் வாய்ஸ்-ஆக பேசிக் கொண்டிருந்த பழனிசாமி, இப்போது ஒரிஜினல் வாய்ஸாக பேச தொடங்கிவிட்டார்.."ஸ்டாலின் காட்டம்•⁠ ⁠இபிஎஸ்-ன் கருத்தும் முத்தரசனின் பதிலடியும்!•⁠ ⁠மறைந்த நெல் ஜெயராமனுக்கு சிலை நிறுவப்படும் என முதலமைச்சர் அறிவிப்பு•⁠ ⁠திருவாரூரில் வீடு, வீடாக சென்று முதல்வர் பரப்புரை•⁠ ⁠"MGR, ஜெயலலிதா செய்ததும் சதிச் செயலா..?" - இபிஎஸ்-க்கு அமைச்சர் சேகர்பாபு கேள்வி•⁠ ⁠அதிமுக தோழமை கட்சி - திருமாவளவன்..!•⁠ ⁠பிரதமர் மோடிக்கு நமீபியாவின் உயரிய விருது!•⁠ ⁠குஜராத் விபத்து பலி எண்ணிக்கை அதிகரிப்பு?•⁠ ⁠தவெக தொண்டர்களின் படகுகளுக்கு மறுக்கப்படும் மானியம்?•⁠ ⁠பரந்தூர் விமான நிலையம்.. பத்திர பதிவு தொடக்கம்?•⁠ ⁠உக்ரைனில் ரஷ்யா தீவிர தாக்குதல்?•⁠ ⁠காஸாவில் 40 பேர் கொல்லப்பட்டனர்?

Streamen, Chatten, Gaming, KI-Chatbots – All das verbraucht viel Energie und belastet das Klima. Luam will mit Luka und Paula herausfinden: Wie groß ist der Einfluss wirklich? Kann man Energie sparen, ohne komplett auf Handy & Co. zu verzichten? Und ist klimafreundliches Verhalten wirklich so schwer? Darum geht's in dieser Folge von neuneinhalb.

Mädchen können nicht Fußball spielen? Frauenfußball ist langsam, langweilig und interessiert eh keinen? Solche Sprüche hast du vielleicht schon mal gehört oder in den Kommentaren auf Social Media gelesen. Wir haben mit Profifußballerin Marina Hegering, jungen Kickerinnen und auch Nicht-Fußballfans darüber gesprochen und zeigen, was im Frauenfußball los ist.

Du willst einen Ferienjob haben, hast aber keine Ahnung, wie du einen an Land ziehst? Bei unserer „neuneinhalb“-Ferienjob-Challenge kannst du Dion und Benet über die Schulter schauen, wie sie Online-Jobs testen und in ihrer Nachbarschaft auf Jobjagd gehen. Außerdem erfährst du, was du bei deiner Suche beachten solltest. Und wir verraten dir unsere Top 3 Vorschläge für Ferienjobs.

Aus einer Idee einen Text zu machen – das schafft eine Künstliche Intelligenz in Sekundenschnelle. Aber wie funktioniert das eigentlich? Ralph erklärt, warum eine KI viel mehr zählt, als sie schreibt. Denn erst durch das Zählen von Wörtern, Buchstaben und deren Kombinationen sammelt sie Daten – und erkennt darin schließlich Muster. So „lernt“ die KI und kann mithilfe dieser Muster neue Texte zusammenzusetzen. Die wirken fast, als hätte sie ein Mensch geschrieben…

Vítejte v dalším díle podcastu Srdeční záležitosti, tentokrát s velmi praktickým, ale překvapivě inspirativním tématem. Hostkou je Mária Chvajová Staňková – advokátka s více než 20letou praxí, která se specializuje na online podnikání, GDPR a ochranu podnikatelů v digitálním světě. Společně rozkrýváme, co všechno by měly mít ženy podnikatelky správně nastavené na svých webových stránkách, jak přistupovat k obchodním podmínkám, kdy se vyplatí písemná smlouva, a proč je lepší řešit právo preventivně než reaktivně. Zazní i osobní příběh Márii, jak se dostala od Seznam.cz až k podpoře žen v online podnikání — a jak vznikl projekt Crypto Ladies, který otevírá ženám dveře do světa kryptoměn. Epizoda je laskavá, edukativní a posilující. Pokud podnikáte online nebo to plánujete, tohle si rozhodně poslechněte. Už letí k vašim uším! Mgr. Mária Chvajová Staňková advokátka pro online podnikání a GDPR www.stankovapartneri.cz Mária se zaměřuje na propojení práva, podnikání a internetu. Podnikatelům na internetu pomáhá mít právní věci v pořádku. Jako samostatná advokátka působí od roku 2005. Řadu let spolupracovala se společností Seznam.cz, a (nejen) proto se její specializace vyprofilovala na právní pomoc pro podnikatele v online. Její další oblastí specializace je ochrana osobních údajů, je zakládající členkou Spolku pro ochranu osobních údajů. O své práci píše a přednáší. Právo v online přibližuje menším podnikatelům, aby se této problematiky nebáli a měli své právní záležitosti v pořádku. Osvětu dělá pod značkou Posviťme si, a vede facebookovou skupinu Posviťme si: právo pro online podnikání a GDPR https://www.facebook.com/groups/6932077750254451

Kdy je vysvědčení zodpovědností dítěte a kdy vizitkou rodičovské práce? Máme děti za vysvědčení chválit či trestat? Jak číst známky? A kdo může pomoci, pokud se dítěti ve škole nedaří?O tom jsme si povídali se školní psycholožkou, Mgr. Anitou Michajlukovou.Pište nám na ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠nazory@sancedetem.cz⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ nebo na ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠facebookové stránce Šance Dětem⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, jaká témata by vás v rámci podcastu v budoucnu zajímala. Pokud má vaše dítě problémy nebo si složitým obdobím prochází celá rodina, pomoc najdete i na našem webu ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://sancedetem.cz⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

Právny systém EPI. Je postavený na najmodernejších technológiách spracovania odborných právnych informácií a vďaka úplne novým funkciám vytvára komfortné užívateľské prostredie.EPI právny systém je vlajkovou loďou spoločnosti Poradca podnikateľa.Za 20 rokov sa stal rešpektovanou značkou, ktorú vyhľadávajú všetci, ktorí pracujú s legislatívou. Za každým článkom, aktualizáciou, dokumentom aj pomocou pre právnikov sú ľudia.EPI nie je len právny systém. EPI je komunita odborníkov.V dnešnej epizóde predstavujeme časť tímu, ktorý každý deň tvorí, aktualizuje, komunikuje a stará sa o to, aby ste v EPI našli suverénne argumenty pre svoju prax.Hosťami boli: Ing. Ivan Vozár – obchodný riaditeľ Poradcu podnikateľa, obchodní zástupcovia - Renáta Šrámková, Ing. Jiří Nosek, PhDr. Andrea Váleková – brand manažérka pre právnické značky a Mgr. Andrea Sládková – manažérka produktovej skupiny.V podcaste sa dozviete:Začiatky EPI – čo bolo najväčšou výzvou?Ako sa menili potreby právnickej komunity?Ako vplýva spätná väzba od používateľov na vylepšenia EPI?Pre koho je EPI najvhodnejší?Čo znamená absolútny právny systém?EPI.sk – umenie suverénnych argumentov

Deutschland rüstet auf: mehr Waffen, mehr Soldaten, mehr Geld für die Bundeswehr. So will die Regierung das Land verteidigungsfähiger machen. Aber braucht es wirklich Aufrüstung, um Frieden zu sichern? Wie soll das finanziert werden? Und was hat es mit den Plänen für einen neuen Wehrdienst auf sich? Jana und Robert fragen nach – bei Fachleuten und bei Jugendlichen. Was sie herausgefunden haben, zeigt diese Folge von neuneinhalb.

In Lermoos in den Tiroler Alpen gibt es einmal im Jahr ein großes Ereignis. Zur Sommersonnenwende erleuchten, wenn es dunkel wird, viele unterschiedliche Bilder auf den Bergen. In diesem Jahr hat das Bergfeuer-Team um Sascha Fasser etwas ganz besonderes vor: Maus und Elefant als riesiges Bergfeuermotiv – 198 Meter lang, 75 Meter breit und bestehend aus 1.025 Lichtern. So ein großes Bild muss sorgfältig geplant werden und ganz schön viele Kerzen braucht man dafür auch… Im zweiten Teil der Sachgeschichte muss das Motiv am Hang gesteckt werden: Mit einem Seil zeichnet das Team zuerst die Konturen von Maus und Elefant, bis schließlich die Lichter ausgelegt werden. Jetzt steht alles bereit für das große Anzünden am Abend – ob es dem Bergfeuer-Team wirklich gelungen ist, dieses riesige Motiv auf den Berg zu zaubern?

ASX 200 kicks off the week in style, up 72 points to 8587, a new record. Banks kicked again with CBA up 1.2% and NAB running 1.5% higher. The Big Bank Basket up to $284.50 (1.2%). MQG kicked 1.1% with financials generally doing well, IFL up 0.9% and ZIP up 6.4% on BNPL reforms. REITs also in demand, GMG up 2.1% and MGR better by 2.2% with healthcare better too, CSL up 0.9%. Retail stocks rallied as JBH gained 2.1% and ALL up 3.6% and tech stocks in demand, WTC up 2.4% and XRO rising 1.8% with the all-tech index up 1.6%. In resources, iron ore miners mixed, gold miners sold down aggressively, GMD off 1.3% with EVN down 3.8% and shorts in the lithium space gaining momentum. PLS up 5.5% and LTR up 4.8% with MIN gaining 5.1%. Rare earth stocks remain in favour and oil and gas stocks better. Uranium stocks tried to put in another stellar day but off the highs, PDN up 3.6% and BOE up 2.1%. In corporate news, ASB rallied another 7.3% as the US approved Hanwha holding. NXT up 5.2% on Malaysian expansion plans. MVF cratered 26.9% on another clinical issue. JLG in a trading halt pending a change of control announcement. Nothing on the economic front, Asian markets slightly higher, Japan up 0.2% and HK down 0.5% and China down 0.6%. 10-year yields at 4.26%, steady. Want to invest with Marcus Today? The Managed Strategy Portfolio is designed for investors seeking exposure to our strategy while we do the hard work for you. If you're looking for personal financial advice, our friends at Clime Investment Management can help. Their team of licensed advisers operates across most states, offering tailored financial planning services.  Why not sign up for a free trial? Gain access to expert insights, research, and analysis to become a better investor.

Každý máme názory a skúsenosti, ale len spoločne máme dáta. Povedz nám, čo potrebuješ pre svoj kariérny rast. Vyplň prieskum tu: https://edu.mladilekari.sk/prieskum-2025V najnovšej epizóde podcastu Rozhovory MD sa opäť rozprávame s prof. MUDr. Mgr. Milošom Jeseňákom, PhD, MBA, MHA, Dott.Ric., FAAAAI – primárom Oddelenia klinickej imunológie a alergológie v Univerzitnej nemocnici Martin a prezidentom Slovenskej spoločnosti alergológie a klinickej imunológie.Miloš Jeseňák patrí medzi najmladších profesorov klinickej medicíny na Slovensku. Dlhodobo inšpiruje svojím prístupom k medicíne, vedeniu tímov a schopnosťou nastavovať vysoký štandard v zdravotníctve – a zároveň ostať ľudský. Máš sa teda rozhodne na čo tešiť

Stop doomscrolling!This generation often overlooks the magic of 8-minute songs in MGR and STR movies.Those songs weren't just music — they were emotion, storytelling, and pure art.Try listening to the full song without skipping.Feel it.Understand it.And let that focus shift your mindset from distraction to productivity.

We bellen met een medewerkster van Radio Maria Perú, Fiorella. Ze vertelt over de verschillende ontmoetingen met Mgr. Prevost en zijn werk in het land! We bidden deze week zeer speciaal voor Radio Maria Albanië!

Wie funktioniert ein Schiffshebewerk? In Niederfinow in Brandenburg steht neben dem ältesten noch arbeitenden Schiffshebewerk Deutschlands auch das modernste in Europa. Die helfen Schiffen dabei, eine 36-Meter-Stufe zu überwinden. Eine Art Aufzug für Schiffe! Welche Mechanik dahinter steckt und was die beiden Schiffshebewerke unterscheidet, findet André bei seinem Besuch vor Ort heraus.

KK and GAA Hurling Forum - Presentation from Willie Maher GAA Hurling Dev. Mgr. 04.06.2025

Výživa v těhotenství i při kojení patří mezi často diskutovaná témata. Jenže s množstvím rad přichází i nejistota: co si opravdu dopřát, co raději omezit a kdy má smysl nechat si udělat krevní testy?S nutriční terapeutkou Mgr. Veronikou Chalánkovou si povídáme o tom, jak si nastavit zdravý a udržitelný jídelníček během těhotenství i po porodu. Zmiňujeme také případy potravinových intolerancí, potřebu doplňků stravy a nejčastější mýty, třeba zda je nutné omezit kávu nebo vynechat mléko.V timestamps si můžeš vybrat konkrétní téma, které tě zajímá:▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Timestamps ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬00:00 Intro a představení hosta01:39 Co je to iniciativa 1000 dní02:50 Jak se stravovat před otěhotněním a v těhotenství10:03 Jak se řeší intolerance a speciální diety v těhotenství15:26 Problémy v třetím trimestru a vliv stravy23:30 Zvláštní chutě v těhotenství25:39 Strava u malých dětí 31:00 Kojení a strava34:37 Výživa ženy během kojení a po porodu

Steatóza jater neboli ztučnění jater. Stav, při kterém dochází k nadměrnému ukládání tuku v jaterních buňkách postihuje stále více lidí a může být prvním krokem k vážnějším jaterním onemocněním, jako je cirhóza nebo dokonce rakovina jater. Přesto jde o problém, kterému lze často předejít. Jaké jsou příčiny ztučnění jater? Jak včas problém rozpoznat? O tom si dnes budeme povídat s MUDr. Mgr. Irenou Míkovou, Ph.D., lékařkou z Kliniky hepatogastroenterologie IKEM.

Laufen, Schwimmen, Medaillen abräumen! Sina ist topfit, dabei wäre sie als Baby fast gestorben. Eine Organspende hat sie damals gerettet. Heute rockt sie die Meisterschaften der Transplantierten. Warum Organspenden Leben retten, wie das Ganze abläuft und was man darüber wissen sollte – das alles zeigen wir in dieser Folge von "neuneinhalb".

Wie fair geht's wirklich zu in Deutschland? In dieser neuneinhalb-Folge machen wir den Realitäts-Check: Haben Jugendliche bei uns wirklich die gleichen Chancen? Mit einem spannenden Experiment zeigen wir, woran es hapert – und was wir tun können, um echte Chancengleichheit möglich zu machen.

Wie fair geht's wirklich zu in Deutschland? In dieser neuneinhalb-Folge machen wir den Realitäts-Check: Haben Jugendliche bei uns wirklich die gleichen Chancen? Mit einem spannenden Experiment zeigen wir, woran es hapert – und was wir tun können, um echte Chancengleichheit möglich zu machen.

L'intrigue se déroule sous la coupole de l'Académie française. À la suite de la mort de Mgr d'Abbeville, chaque nouveau candidat à l'immortalité qui est désigné pour occuper son fauteuil, meurt lors du discours d'hommage à son prédécesseur. Hippolyte Patard, secrétaire perpétuel commence à désespérer, personne ne voulant être le successeur de Mgr d'Abbeville, craignant une malédiction lancée par un mage, dont on n'aurait pas voulu comme académicien. C'est alors qu'arrive Gaspard Lalouette, simple antiquaire et marchand.

Ostravské muzeum se již bezmála sto let nachází v budově tzv. Staré radnice na Masarykově náměstí v centru města. Redaktor Antonín Žolnerčík instituci navštívil a k mikrofonu si pozval historika Mgr. Jiřího Sochorka spolu s tiskovou mluvčí Mgr. Anetou Trojákovou.

Fünf Tage ohne Handy: Für manche klingt das wie ein Albtraum. Aber steckt dahinter vielleicht auch eine Chance? Und wie kommt man eine Woche ohne Handy klar? Rund 20 Schülerinnen und Schüler aus Lüdinghausen probieren es aus! Von Montag bis Freitag geben sie ihre Handys ab. Wie das Experiment verläuft, welche Aha-Momente sie haben und wie sie die Woche ohne Handy erleben – das alles erfährst du bei neuneinhalb!

"When the community comes together, organizes, advocates, makes noise, and has a plan, we can change systems” - Richard RayaJoin host George Koster for part two of our Arts for a Better Bay Area highlights as ten visionary guests tackle some of the big issues facing San Francisco and our arts organizations and creative workforce; Such as downtown vacancies, converting offices into affordable artist homes, changing Hotel Tax Funding of the arts via reforms ensuring transparent hotel‑tax dollars, and showcasing the impact of arts in economic development of neighborhoods like the Mid‑Market along with providing direct grants to artists that revive the city's cultural heartbeat.Guests:Joshua Simon, Senior Advisor, Community Arts Stabilization TrustKathryn Reasoner, Executive Consultant, Vital ArtsRichard Raya, Chief Strategy Officer, Mission Economic Development AgencyFernando Pujals, Deputy Director,Mid‑Market Business AssociationJacob Bintliff, Mgr of Economic Recovery Initiatives, SF Office of Economic & Workforce DevelopmentLaura Poppiti, Program Director, Center for Cultural InnovationMeredith Winner, Co-Founder & COO, Building 180/Paint the VoidJoe Landini, Director / Founder, SafeHouse ArtsVinay Patel, Executive Director, Asian Pacific Islander Cultural CenterDenise Pate, Director Community Investments, SF Arts CommissionDon't just be a listener; Be a doer!For more information, guest details, and resources from this episode, visit our episode web page.  Dive deeper into these vital discussions and access the California Arts & Culture Summit Resource Guide todayMake a Donation: Support Voices of the Community, fiscally sponsored by Intersection for the Arts, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, and enjoy tax deductions for your contributions. Newsletter: Sign up  to stay updated on future episodes and events  Delve deeper into Voices of the Community Series on Arts & Culture, Making the Invisible-Visible, Covid-19's impact on nonprofits, small businesses and local government, City of Stockton's rise from the ashes of bankruptcy and our archives: You can explore episodes, speakers, organizations, and resources through each series web page. Watch and learn from all five series now!

Listen to ASCO's JCO Oncology Practice, Art of Oncology Practice article, "An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last” by Dr. David Johnson, who is a clinical oncologist at University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. The article is followed by an interview with Johnson and host Dr. Mikkael Sekeres. Through humor and irony, Johnson critiques how overspecialization and poor presentation practices have eroded what was once internal medicine's premier educational forum. Transcript Narrator: An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last, by David H. Johnson, MD, MACP, FASCO   Over the past five decades, I have attended hundreds of medical conferences—some insightful and illuminating, others tedious and forgettable. Among these countless gatherings, Medical Grand Rounds (MGRs) has always held a special place. Originally conceived as a forum for discussing complex clinical cases, emerging research, and best practices in patient care, MGRs served as a unifying platform for clinicians across all specialties, along with medical students, residents, and other health care professionals. Expert speakers—whether esteemed faculty or distinguished guests—would discuss challenging cases, using them as a springboard to explore the latest advances in diagnosis and treatment. During my early years as a medical student, resident, and junior faculty member, Grand Rounds consistently attracted large, engaged audiences. However, as medicine became increasingly subspecialized, attendance began to wane. Lectures grew more technically intricate, often straying from broad clinical relevance. The patient-centered discussions that once brought together diverse medical professionals gradually gave way to hyperspecialized presentations. Subspecialists, once eager to share their insights with the wider medical community, increasingly withdrew to their own specialty-specific conferences, further fragmenting the exchange of knowledge across disciplines. As a former Chair of Internal Medicine and a veteran of numerous MGRs, I observed firsthand how these sessions shifted from dynamic educational exchanges to highly specialized, often impenetrable discussions. One of the most striking trends in recent years has been the decline in presentation quality at MGR—even among local and visiting world-renowned experts. While these speakers are often brilliant clinicians and investigators, they can also be remarkably poor lecturers, delivering some of the most uninspiring talks I have encountered. Their presentations are so consistently lackluster that one might suspect an underlying strategy at play—an unspoken method to ensure that they are never invited back. Having observed this pattern repeatedly, I am convinced that these speakers must be adhering to a set of unwritten rules to avoid future MGR presentations. To assist those unfamiliar with this apparent strategy, I have distilled the key principles that, when followed correctly, all but guarantee that a presenter will not be asked to give another MGR lecture—thus sparing them the burden of preparing one in the future. Drawing on my experience as an oncologist, I illustrate these principles using an oncology-based example although I suspect similar rules apply across other subspecialties. It will be up to my colleagues in cardiology, endocrinology, rheumatology, and beyond to identify and document their own versions—tasks for which I claim no expertise. What follows are the seven “Rules for Presenting a Bad Medical Oncology Medical Grand Rounds.” 1.  Microscopic Mayhem: Always begin with an excruciatingly detailed breakdown of the tumor's histology and molecular markers, emphasizing how these have evolved over the years (eg, PAP v prostate-specific antigen)—except, of course, when they have not (eg, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, etc). These nuances, while of limited relevance to general internists or most subspecialists (aside from oncologists), are guaranteed to induce eye-glazing boredom and quiet despair among your audience. 2. TNM Torture: Next, cover every nuance of the newest staging system … this is always a real crowd pleaser. For illustrative purposes, show a TNM chart in the smallest possible font. It is particularly helpful if you provide a lengthy review of previous versions of the staging system and painstakingly cover each and every change in the system. Importantly, this activity will allow you to disavow the relevance of all previous literature studies to which you will subsequently refer during the course of your presentation … to wit—“these data are based on the OLD staging system and therefore may not pertain …” This phrase is pure gold—use it often if you can. NB: You will know you have “captured” your audience if you observe audience members “shifting in their seats” … it occurs almost every time … but if you have failed to “move” the audience … by all means, continue reading … there is more! 3. Mechanism of Action Meltdown: Discuss in detail every drug ever used to treat the cancer under discussion; this works best if you also give a detailed description of each drug's mechanism of action (MOA). General internists and subspecialists just LOVE hearing a detailed discussion of the drug's MOA … especially if it is not at all relevant to the objectives of your talk. At this point, if you observe a wave of slack-jawed faces slowly slumping toward their desktops, you will know you are on your way to successfully crushing your audience's collective spirit. Keep going—you are almost there. 4. Dosage Deadlock: One must discuss “dose response” … there is absolutely nothing like a dose response presentation to a group of internists to induce cries of anguish. A wonderful example of how one might weave this into a lecture to generalists or a mixed audience of subspecialists is to discuss details that ONLY an oncologist would care about—such as the need to dose escalate imatinib in GIST patients with exon 9 mutations as compared with those with exon 11 mutations. This is a definite winner! 5. Criteria Catatonia: Do not forget to discuss the newest computed tomography or positron emission tomography criteria for determining response … especially if you plan to discuss an obscure malignancy that even oncologists rarely encounter (eg, esthesioneuroblastoma). Should you plan to discuss a common disease you can ensure ennui only if you will spend extra time discussing RECIST criteria. Now if you do this well, some audience members may begin fashioning their breakfast burritos into projectiles—each one aimed squarely at YOU. Be brave … soldier on! 6. Kaplan-Meier Killer: Make sure to discuss the arcane details of multiple negative phase II and III trials pertaining to the cancer under discussion. It is best to show several inconsequential and hard-to-read Kaplan-Meier plots. To make sure that you do a bad job, divide this portion of your presentation into two sections … one focused on adjuvant treatment; the second part should consist of a long boring soliloquy on the management of metastatic disease. Provide detailed information of little interest even to the most ardent fan of the disease you are discussing. This alone will almost certainly ensure that you will never, ever be asked to give Medicine Grand Rounds again. 7. Lymph Node Lobotomy: For the coup de grâce, be sure to include an exhaustive discussion of the latest surgical techniques, down to the precise number of lymph nodes required for an “adequate dissection.” To be fair, such details can be invaluable in specialized settings like a tumor board, where they send subspecialists into rapturous delight. But in the context of MGR—where the audience spans multiple disciplines—it will almost certainly induce a stultifying torpor. If dullness were an art, this would be its masterpiece—capable of lulling even the most caffeinated minds into a stupor. If you have carefully followed the above set of rules, at this point, some members of the audience should be banging their heads against the nearest hard surface. If you then hear a loud THUD … and you're still standing … you will know you have succeeded in giving the world's worst Medical Grand Rounds!   Final Thoughts I hope that these rules shed light on what makes for a truly dreadful oncology MGR presentation—which, by inverse reasoning, might just serve as a blueprint for an excellent one. At its best, an outstanding lecture defies expectations. One of the most memorable MGRs I have attended, for instance, was on prostaglandin function—not a subject typically associated with edge-of-your-seat suspense. Given by a biochemist and physician from another subspecialty, it could have easily devolved into a labyrinth of enzymatic pathways and chemical structures. Instead, the speaker took a different approach: rather than focusing on biochemical minutiae, he illustrated how prostaglandins influence nearly every major physiologic system—modulating inflammation, regulating cardiovascular function, protecting the gut, aiding reproduction, supporting renal function, and even influencing the nervous system—without a single slide depicting the prostaglandin structure. The result? A room full of clinicians—not biochemists—walked away with a far richer understanding of how prostaglandins affect their daily practice. What is even more remarkable is that the talk's clarity did not just inform—it sparked new collaborations that shaped years of NIH-funded research. Now that was an MGR masterpiece. At its core, effective scientific communication boils down to three deceptively simple principles: understanding your audience, focusing on relevance, and making complex information accessible.2 The best MGRs do not drown the audience in details, but rather illuminate why those details matter. A great lecture is not about showing how much you know, but about ensuring your audience leaves knowing something they didn't before. For those who prefer the structured wisdom of a written guide over the ramblings of a curmudgeon, an excellent review of these principles—complete with a handy checklist—is available.2 But fair warning: if you follow these principles, you may find yourself invited back to present another stellar MGRs. Perish the thought! Dr. Mikkael SekeresHello and welcome to JCO's Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology, which features essays and personal reflections from authors exploring their experience in the oncology field. I'm your host, Mikkael Sekeres. I'm Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Hematology at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami.  What a pleasure it is today to be joined by Dr. David Johnson, clinical oncologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. In this episode, we will be discussing his Art of Oncology Practice article, "An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last."  Our guest's disclosures will be linked in the transcript.  David, welcome to our podcast and thanks so much for joining us. Dr. David JohnsonGreat to be here, Mikkael. Thanks for inviting me. Dr. Mikkael SekeresI was wondering if we could start with just- give us a sense about you. Can you tell us about yourself? Where are you from? And walk us through your career. Dr. David JohnsonSure. I grew up in a small rural community in Northwest Georgia about 30 miles south of Chattanooga, Tennessee, in the Appalachian Mountains. I met my wife in kindergarten. Dr. Mikkael SekeresOh my. Dr. David JohnsonThere are laws in Georgia. We didn't get married till the third grade. But we dated in high school and got married after college. And so we've literally been with one another my entire life, our entire lives. Dr. Mikkael SekeresMy word. Dr. David JohnsonI went to medical school in Georgia. I did my training in multiple sites, including my oncology training at Vanderbilt, where I completed my training. I spent the next 30 years there, where I had a wonderful career. Got an opportunity to be a Division Chief and a Deputy Director of, and the founder of, a cancer center there. And in 2010, I was recruited to UT Southwestern as the Chairman of Medicine. Not a position I had particularly aspired to, but I was interested in taking on that challenge, and it proved to be quite a challenge for me. I had to relearn internal medicine, and really all the subspecialties of medicine really became quite challenging to me. So my career has spanned sort of the entire spectrum, I suppose, as a clinical investigator, as an administrator, and now as a near end-of-my-career guy who writes ridiculous articles about grand rounds. Dr. Mikkael SekeresNot ridiculous at all. It was terrific. What was that like, having to retool? And this is a theme you cover a little bit in your essay, also, from something that's super specialized. I mean, you have had this storied career with the focus on lung cancer, and then having to expand not only to all of hematology oncology, but all of medicine. Dr. David JohnsonIt was a challenge, but it was also incredibly fun. My first few days in the chair's office, I met with a number of individuals, but perhaps the most important individuals I met with were the incoming chief residents who were, and are, brilliant men and women. And we made a pact. I promised to teach them as much as I could about oncology if they would teach me as much as they could about internal medicine. And so I spent that first year literally trying to relearn medicine. And I had great teachers. Several of those chiefs are now on the faculty here or elsewhere. And that continued on for the next several years. Every group of chief residents imparted their wisdom to me, and I gave them what little bit I could provide back to them in the oncology world. It was a lot of fun. And I have to say, I don't necessarily recommend everybody go into administration. It's not necessarily the most fun thing in the world to do. But the opportunity to deal one-on-one closely with really brilliant men and women like the chief residents was probably the highlight of my time as Chair of Medicine. Dr. Mikkael SekeresThat sounds incredible. I can imagine, just reflecting over the two decades that I've been in hematology oncology and thinking about the changes in how we diagnose and care for people over that time period, I can only imagine what the changes had been in internal medicine since I was last immersed in that, which would be my residency. Dr. David JohnsonWell, I trained in the 70s in internal medicine, and what transpired in the 70s was kind of ‘monkey see, monkey do'. We didn't really have a lot of understanding of pathophysiology except at the most basic level. Things have changed enormously, as you well know, certainly in the field of oncology and hematology, but in all the other fields as well. And so I came in with what I thought was a pretty good foundation of knowledge, and I realized it was completely worthless, what I had learned as an intern and resident. And when I say I had to relearn medicine, I mean, I had to relearn medicine. It was like being an intern. Actually, it was like being a medical student all over again. Dr. Mikkael SekeresOh, wow. Dr. David JohnsonSo it's quite challenging.  Dr. Mikkael SekeresWell, and it's just so interesting. You're so deliberate in your writing and thinking through something like grand rounds. It's not a surprise, David, that you were also deliberate in how you were going to approach relearning medicine. So I wonder if we could pivot to talking about grand rounds, because part of being a Chair of Medicine, of course, is having Department of Medicine grand rounds. And whether those are in a cancer center or a department of medicine, it's an honor to be invited to give a grand rounds talk. How do you think grand rounds have changed over the past few decades? Can you give an example of what grand rounds looked like in the 1990s compared to what they look like now? Dr. David JohnsonWell, I should all go back to the 70s and and talk about grand rounds in the 70s. And I referenced an article in my essay written by Dr. Ingelfinger, who many people remember Dr. Ingelfinger as the Ingelfinger Rule, which the New England Journal used to apply. You couldn't publish in the New England Journal if you had published or publicly presented your data prior to its presentation in the New England Journal. Anyway, Dr. Ingelfinger wrote an article which, as I say, I referenced in my essay, about the graying of grand rounds, when he talked about what grand rounds used to be like. It was a very almost sacred event where patients were presented, and then experts in the field would discuss the case and impart to the audience their wisdom and knowledge garnered over years of caring for patients with that particular problem, might- a disease like AML, or lung cancer, or adrenal insufficiency, and talk about it not just from a pathophysiologic standpoint, but from a clinician standpoint. How do these patients present? What do you do? How do you go about diagnosing and what can you do to take care of those kinds of patients? It was very patient-centric. And often times the patient, him or herself, was presented at the grand rounds. And then experts sitting in the front row would often query the speaker and put him or her under a lot of stress to answer very specific questions about the case or about the disease itself.  Over time, that evolved, and some would say devolved, but evolved into more specialized and nuanced presentations, generally without a patient present, or maybe even not even referred to, but very specifically about the molecular biology of disease, which is marvelous and wonderful to talk about, but not necessarily in a grand round setting where you've got cardiologists sitting next to endocrinologists, seated next to nephrologists, seated next to primary care physicians and, you know, an MS1 and an MS2 and et cetera. So it was very evident to me that what I had witnessed in my early years in medicine had really become more and more subspecialized. As a result, grand rounds, which used to be packed and standing room only, became echo chambers. It was like a C-SPAN presentation, you know, where local representative got up and gave a talk and the chambers were completely empty. And so we had to go to do things like force people to attend grand rounds like a Soviet Union-style rally or something, you know. You have to pay them to go. But it was really that observation that got me to thinking about it.  And by the way, I love oncology and I'm, I think there's so much exciting progress that's being made that I want the presentations to be exciting to everybody, not just to the oncologist or the hematologist, for example. And what I was witnessing was kind of a formula that, almost like a pancake formula, that everybody followed the same rules. You know, “This disease is the third most common cancer and it presents in this way and that way.” And it was very, very formulaic. It wasn't energizing and exciting as it had been when we were discussing individual patients. So, you know, it just is what it is. I mean, progress is progress and you can't stop it. And I'm not trying to make America great again, you know, by going back to the 70s, but I do think sometimes we overthink what medical grand rounds ought to be as compared to a presentation at ASH or ASCO where you're talking to subspecialists who understand the nuances and you don't have to explain the abbreviations, you know, that type of thing. Dr. Mikkael SekeresSo I wonder, you talk about the echo chamber of the grand rounds nowadays, right? It's not as well attended. It used to be a packed event, and it used to be almost a who's who of, of who's in the department. You'd see some very famous people who would attend every grand rounds and some up-and-comers, and it was a chance for the chief residents to shine as well. How do you think COVID and the use of Zoom has changed the personality and energy of grand rounds? Is it better because, frankly, more people attend—they just attend virtually. Last time I attended, I mean, I attend our Department of Medicine grand rounds weekly, and I'll often see 150, 200 people on the Zoom. Or is it worse because the interaction's limited? Dr. David JohnsonYeah, I don't want to be one of those old curmudgeons that says, you know, the way it used to be is always better. But there's no question that the convenience of Zoom or similar media, virtual events, is remarkable. I do like being able to sit in my office where I am right now and watch a conference across campus that I don't have to walk 30 minutes to get to. I like that, although I need the exercise. But at the same time, I think one of the most important aspects of coming together is lost with virtual meetings, and that's the casual conversation that takes place. I mentioned in my essay an example of the grand rounds that I attended given by someone in a different specialty who was both a physician and a PhD in biochemistry, and he was talking about prostaglandin metabolism. And talk about a yawner of a title; you almost have to prop your eyelids open with toothpicks. But it turned out to be one of the most fascinating, engaging conversations I've ever encountered. And moreover, it completely opened my eyes to an area of research that I had not been exposed to at all. And it became immediately obvious to me that it was relevant to the area of my interest, which was lung cancer. This individual happened to be just studying colon cancer. He's not an oncologist, but he was studying colon cancer. But it was really interesting what he was talking about. And he made it very relevant to every subspecialist and generalist in the audience because he talked about how prostaglandin has made a difference in various aspects of human physiology.  The other grand rounds which always sticks in my mind was presented by a long standing program director at my former institution of Vanderbilt. He's passed away many years ago, but he gave a fascinating grand rounds where he presented the case of a homeless person. I can't remember the title of his grand rounds exactly, but I think it was “Care of the Homeless” or something like that. So again, not something that necessarily had people rushing to the audience. What he did is he presented this case as a mysterious case, you know, “what is it?” And he slowly built up the presentation of this individual who repeatedly came to the emergency department for various and sundry complaints. And to make a long story short, he presented a case that turned out to be lead poisoning. Everybody was on the edge of their seat trying to figure out what it was. And he was challenging members of the audience and senior members of the audience, including the Cair, and saying, “What do you think?” And it turned out that the patient became intoxicated not by eating paint chips or drinking lead infused liquids. He was burning car batteries to stay alive and inhaling lead fumes, which itself was fascinating, you know, so it was a fabulous grand rounds. And I mean, everybody learned something about the disease that they might otherwise have ignored, you know, if it'd been a title “Lead Poisoning”, I'm not sure a lot of people would have shown up. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres That story, David, reminds me of Tracy Kidder, who's a master of the nonfiction narrative, will choose a subject and kind of just go into great depth about it, and that subject could be a person. And he wrote a book called Rough Sleepers about Jim O'Connell - and Jim O'Connell was one of my attendings when I did my residency at Mass General - and about his life and what he learned about the homeless. And it's this same kind of engaging, “Wow, I never thought about that.” And it takes you in a different direction.  And you know, in your essay, you make a really interesting comment. You reflect that subspecialists, once eager to share their insight with the wider medical community, increasingly withdraw to their own specialty specific conferences, further fragmenting the exchange of knowledge across disciplines. How do you think this affects their ability to gain new insights into their research when they hear from a broader audience and get questions that they usually don't face, as opposed to being sucked into the groupthink of other subspecialists who are similarly isolated? Dr. David Johnson That's one of the reasons I chose to illustrate that prostaglandin presentation, because again, that was not something that I specifically knew much about. And as I said, I went to the grand rounds more out of a sense of obligation than a sense of engagement. Moreover, our Chair at that institution forced us to go, so I was there, not by choice, but I'm so glad I was, because like you say, I got insight into an area that I had not really thought about and that cross pollination and fertilization is really a critical aspect. I think that you can gain at a broad conference like Medical Grand Rounds as opposed to a niche conference where you're talking about APL. You know, everybody's an APL expert, but they never thought about diabetes and how that might impact on their research. So it's not like there's an ‘aha' moment at every Grand Rounds, but I do think that those kinds of broad based audiences can sometimes bring a different perspective that even the speaker, him or herself had not thought of. Dr. Mikkael SekeresI think that's a great place to end and to thank David Johnson, who's a clinical oncologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School and just penned the essay in JCO Art of Oncology Practice entitled "An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last."  Until next time, thank you for listening to JCO's Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology. Don't forget to give us a rating or review, and be sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode. You can find all of ASCO's shows at asco.org/podcasts.  David, once again, I want to thank you for joining me today. Dr. David JohnsonThank you very much for having me. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.    Show notes: Like, share and subscribe so you never miss an episode and leave a rating or review.  Guest Bio: Dr David Johnson is a clinical oncologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School.

Viele Jugendliche wissen 80 Jahre nach Kriegsende mit dem Begriff „Holocaust“ nichts oder wenig anzufangen. Wir zeigen, warum das so ist und warum dich und uns alle das Thema heute mehr denn je betrifft. Und wie spannende und zeitgemäße Erinnerungskultur funktionieren kann.

In this episode, BESLER Sr. Mgr. Meliza Weiner, gives a glimpse into BESLER's next Webinar, The Evolving Role of Case Management, live on May 7, 1 PM ET. 

Die Dönerpreise sind bodenlos und sorgen für Aufregung. Immer mehr Leute fordern: Dönerpreisbremse! Was das alles mit der Wirtschaftskrise zu tun hat und wie man die in den Griff kriegen könnte - wir finden es für dich raus.

Ist der Osterhase in Gefahr? Sein Kollege, der Feldhase, ist in Deutschland gefährdet und muss deshalb geschützt werden. Deshalb wird regelmäßig gezählt, wie viele Feldhasen es in Deutschland eigentlich gibt. Wie genau, das guckt sich Robert an. Welche Rolle Scheinwerfer dabei spielen? Und was man tun kann, damit es den Feldhasen besser geht? Das zeigt diese Folge von neuneinhalb!

Vieš, že naše trávenie neovplyvňuje len to, čo zjeme, ale aj to, v akom psychickom rozpoložení práve sme? V tejto epizóde sme sa s nutričnou terapeutkou Mgr. Karolínou Bezecnou, CFNC pozreli na to, ako stres ovplyvňuje tráviaci systém, hormonálne nastavenie aj náš výber jedla. Karolína vysvetľuje, prečo sa v strese mení naša chuť na jedlo, prečo siahneme po slanom a mastnom, a čo sa vtedy odohráva v tele. Zároveň ponúka praktické odporúčania, ako si pomôcť v každodennom živote – aj keď nemáš čas, nechutí ti jesť alebo nevieš, čo s častým nafukovaním. Ako vraví Karolína: „Stres nám odčerpá veľa mikronutrientov.“ Aj preto je dobré naučiť sa s ním lepšie pracovať. Zistíš tiež, čo robiť, keď sa stres odzrkadlí tráviacimi ťažkosťami ako zápcha či hnačka, a ako si nastaviť režim, ktorý podporí tvoje zdravie dlhodobo.   O čom sa rozprávame: 1:47 – Aký vplyv má spánok na trávenie a stres? 3:36 – Čo odporúča Karolína ľuďom, ktorí dlhodobo prežívajú stres? 8:04 – Čo všetko môže spôsobiť chronický stres v tráviacom systéme? 15:03 – Ako si rozumne naplánovať jedlo, aj keď máme nabitý deň? 16:23 – Ako sa zachovať, keď nás stres úplne „vypne“ a nechutí nám jesť? 20:03 – Prečo niekto v strese trpí zápchou a iný zasa hnačkou? 23:51 – Čo môžeme urobiť pre lepšie trávenie v bežnom živote? 26:10 – Je pravda, že rýchle jedenie spôsobuje nafukovanie? 29:46 – Ako ovplyvňuje stres náš pitný režim?   Zapni si túto epizódu a dozvieš sa, ako cez jednoduché návyky a vedomé spomalenie podporiť svoje trávenie aj celkovú pohodu. Tvoje telo ti poďakuje

Rund um Cannabis ranken sich viele Mythen: Es sei harmlos, weil es ja nur eine Pflanze sei; nach dem Kiffen sei man gut drauf. Und süchtig werde man davon eh nicht … oder? Was davon stimmt wirklich? Zusammen mit einer Gruppe Jugendlicher nehmen wir die gängigsten Mythen unter die Lupe.

Syrien steht an einem krassen Punkt in seiner Geschichte: Nach 54 Jahren Diktatur und 13 Jahren Bürgerkrieg wurde Machthaber Baschar al-Assad gestürzt. Wie viele Menschen hoffen auch die 16-Jährige Abir und Journalist Borhan Akid auf einen echten Neuanfang für Syrien. Doch anhaltende Kämpfe lassen Zweifel an einem dauerhaften Frieden für alle aufkommen. Hier erfährst du, was aktuell im Land passiert und was die neue Regierung damit zu tun hat.

Wie wird ein Modellauto gemacht? Ein echtes Einsatzfahrzeug der Feuerwehr soll einen kleinen Doppelgänger bekommen: ein Spielzeug-Auto. Das Maus-Team zeigt Schritt für Schritt, wie aus den ersten Entwürfen mithilfe eines 3D-Druckers, Handarbeit und einer besonderen Maschine ein fertiges Modellauto wird…

Lootboxen in Games locken mit coolen Inhalten – aber das kann ganz schön teuer werden! Jana trifft den 16-jährigen Till, der lange Zeit viel Geld in sogenannte Packs bei EA Sports FC gesteckt hat. Mit welchen Mechaniken uns Spieleentwickler dazu animieren, immer mehr Geld auszugeben? Und ob man davon süchtig werden kann? Das erfährst du in dieser Folge.

காமராஜர், MGR டூ விபி சிங்-வருகை தந்த வெள்ளை மாளிகை சிவாஜியின் ஆன்மா - `அன்னை' இல்லத்தின் மறுபக்கம்

Host: Ray Loewe Guest: Brittany Hemperley, Mgr. of ...... Description: Brittany Hemperly manages Pursuits, the new Willow Valley shop that opened in North last October, in the space previously occupied by the Pharmacy/Drugstore. Rose Bahurka helps her during weekday shop hours from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm. Brittany describes the wide array of products available at Pursuits. Interviewer Ray Loewe could pick up cough syrup for his ailing wife. Cards, chocolates, candy bars, and other edibles such as cheese, crackers, and meats are sold there. Gifts like jewelry, purses, and bags are available. Dog leashes and cat toys are also sold. Best of all, several flavors of Fox Meadows Ice Cream are big sellers. Best of all, Resident suggestions for other products to be sold are taken into consideration.

André liebt alte schwarz-weiß-Sketche, in denen jemand auf einer Bananenschale ausrutscht, aber sind die Schalen wirklich so rutschig? An der RWTH Aachen forschen die Studierenden Zita und Amos dazu und untersuchen mit André die Reibung zwischen Boden und verschiedenen Obstschalen. Bananenschalen sind die rutschigsten und ein Blick ins Laser-Mikroskop zeigt auch, warum.

Odborná diskusia k dokumentu Pachová stopa, režisérky Zuzany Piussi, ktorý odhaľuje problematiku využívania pachových stôp ako dôkazného materiálu v českej justícii s porovnaním využívania týchto prostriedkov na Slovensku. Dokument sa zameriava na príbehy ľudí odsúdených výhradne na základe tejto metódy, ktorej vedecká podloženosť je v ČR veľmi sporná. Diskutujú: - Zuzana Piussi - režisérka - kpt. Mgr. Juraj Malík - vedúci oddelenia pachovej identifikácie odboru kynológie a hipológie Prezídia PZ - plk. v.v. Ing. Bc. Ján Varga - bývalý vedúci oddelenia - doc. JUDr. Radovan Blažek, PhD. z Katedry trestného práva, kriminológie a kriminalistiky Právnickej fakulty UK - Václav Peričevič - predseda spolku Šalamoun, protagonista filmu Moderuje: - Šimon Mach - advokát, člen Spolku Šalamoun

In der Antarktis will Alexander Gerst mit seinem Team Meteoriten finden. Weil das Wetter nicht mitspielt, müssen sie einige Tage im Zelt verbringen. Als sich die Lage etwas bessert, können sie zwar noch keine Meteoriten suchen, aber dafür gibt es einen anderen Auftrag: Die Landebahn für Flugzeuge muss mit dem Schneemobil und einer Schneefräse wieder glatt gezogen werden. Kein Problem für Alexander Gerst, allerdings muss er dafür ganz schön viele Klamotten anziehen… Im letzten Teil der Sachgeschichte geht es für Alexander Gerst und sein Team endlich los. Nach langer Wartezeit im Lager macht sich das Forscherteam mit Schneemobilen auf den Weg. Dort, wo die Gletscher auf Berge treffen, ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, Meteoriten zu finden, am höchsten. Doch wie kann man einen Stein von einem Meteoriten unterscheiden? Und warum ist es überhaupt so wichtig, Meteoriten zu erforschen?

Don McIntyre, founder of the GGR, OGR and now MGR, returns to the podcast! Andy sat down for a meandering conversation where they talk about meeting in Lagos, Portugal at the start of the Mini Globe Race, his philosophies on life, sailing and adventure, Don's definition of success, how he handles the 'haters' surrounding his ambitious events, how he pays for his crazy ideas and lots, lots more. -- ON THE WIND is presented by Forbes Yachts, the yacht sales professionals. Forbes Yachts sell the boats that allow you to effortlessly connect your passion for yachting to the sea, bringing your world one step closer to perfection. Visit forbesyachts.com to get in touch. -- ON THE WIND is also supported by Boat Doctor, powering life on the water. Boat Doctor designs high-powered, off-grid energy systems for boats, RVs and other off-grid applications. To find out more, go to boatdrusa.com.

Oskar ist verliebt: Als er im Geschäft auf ein Mädchen trifft, das dieselben Weltraum-Sammelbildchen mag wie er, ist es um ihn geschehen. Doch wie kann er sie bloß auf sich aufmerksam machen? Mit einem Raumanzug gewinnt er zwar nicht ihre Liebe, aber dafür etwas anderes, was er sich schon lange gewünscht hat…

Die Weltpremiere von „Pit und Peggs“ zeigt, wie die 90 Jahre alte Vision eines Trickfilms von Felix Nussbaum und Michael Loewen vollendet wurde. In der fantasievollen Geschichte machen Pit und Peggs im Traum eine rasante Fahrt mit ihrem Auto durch die Berge. Dabei treffen sie nicht nur andere Autofahrer, sondern auch eine Giraffe, lebende Tanksäulen und Sonnenblumen – und gewinnen zum Schluss sogar einen Preis.

In einer Kita in Ravensburg gibt es Risse in den Wänden. Denn ein Teil des Gebäudes ist ein kleines Stück abgesackt. Das Maus-Team schaut sich an, wieso das passiert ist und wie man die Kita ganz ohne Muskelkraft wieder anheben kann. Bodenproben verraten, dass der Boden unter der Kita zu trocken geworden ist und sich deshalb zusammengezogen hat. Doch wie kann der Boden wieder so stabil gemacht werden, dass die Kita problemlos darauf stehen kann? Mit einigen Rohren, einer Pistole und zwei ganz besonderen Flüssigkeiten…

Wie werden Äpfel richtig gelagert? Es ist Winter und Jana besucht ein weiteres Mal Familie Nachtwey auf dem Biohof, um zu sehen, was bei der Lagerung von Äpfeln besonders wichtig ist. Nachdem die Äpfel sortiert und in großen Kisten gepackt wurden, werden die Tore der Lagerhalle besonders dicht verschlossen. Jana findet heraus, wie der Reifeprozess der Äpfel mit einer Art „Winterschlaf“ verhindert werden kann und was das mit den Löchern auf dem Apfel, den Lentizellen, zu tun hat…