Podcasts about mgr

L'intrigue se déroule sous la coupole de l'Académie française. À la suite de la mort de Mgr d'Abbeville, chaque nouveau candidat à l'immortalité qui est désigné pour occuper son fauteuil, meurt lors du discours d'hommage à son prédécesseur. Hippolyte Patard, secrétaire perpétuel commence à désespérer, personne ne voulant être le successeur de Mgr d'Abbeville, craignant une malédiction lancée par un mage, dont on n'aurait pas voulu comme académicien. C'est alors qu'arrive Gaspard Lalouette, simple antiquaire et marchand.

Ostravské muzeum se již bezmála sto let nachází v budově tzv. Staré radnice na Masarykově náměstí v centru města. Redaktor Antonín Žolnerčík instituci navštívil a k mikrofonu si pozval historika Mgr. Jiřího Sochorka spolu s tiskovou mluvčí Mgr. Anetou Trojákovou.

Fünf Tage ohne Handy: Für manche klingt das wie ein Albtraum. Aber steckt dahinter vielleicht auch eine Chance? Und wie kommt man eine Woche ohne Handy klar? Rund 20 Schülerinnen und Schüler aus Lüdinghausen probieren es aus! Von Montag bis Freitag geben sie ihre Handys ab. Wie das Experiment verläuft, welche Aha-Momente sie haben und wie sie die Woche ohne Handy erleben – das alles erfährst du bei neuneinhalb!

Vandaag staat we stil bij een boodschap van Mgr. Roberto Mallari, bisschop van Tarlac, Tarlac City op de Filipijnen. In zijn bisdom bevinden zich de studio’s van Radio Maria Filipijnen. Vanavond start er in het programma ‘Heiligen Getuigen’ een nieuw boek: We worden geboren om nooit meer te sterven. We sluiten onze uitzending af met […]

"When the community comes together, organizes, advocates, makes noise, and has a plan, we can change systems” - Richard RayaJoin host George Koster for part two of our Arts for a Better Bay Area highlights as ten visionary guests tackle some of the big issues facing San Francisco and our arts organizations and creative workforce; Such as downtown vacancies, converting offices into affordable artist homes, changing Hotel Tax Funding of the arts via reforms ensuring transparent hotel‑tax dollars, and showcasing the impact of arts in economic development of neighborhoods like the Mid‑Market along with providing direct grants to artists that revive the city's cultural heartbeat.Guests:Joshua Simon, Senior Advisor, Community Arts Stabilization TrustKathryn Reasoner, Executive Consultant, Vital ArtsRichard Raya, Chief Strategy Officer, Mission Economic Development AgencyFernando Pujals, Deputy Director,Mid‑Market Business AssociationJacob Bintliff, Mgr of Economic Recovery Initiatives, SF Office of Economic & Workforce DevelopmentLaura Poppiti, Program Director, Center for Cultural InnovationMeredith Winner, Co-Founder & COO, Building 180/Paint the VoidJoe Landini, Director / Founder, SafeHouse ArtsVinay Patel, Executive Director, Asian Pacific Islander Cultural CenterDenise Pate, Director Community Investments, SF Arts CommissionDon't just be a listener; Be a doer!For more information, guest details, and resources from this episode, visit our episode web page.  Dive deeper into these vital discussions and access the California Arts & Culture Summit Resource Guide todayMake a Donation: Support Voices of the Community, fiscally sponsored by Intersection for the Arts, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, and enjoy tax deductions for your contributions. Newsletter: Sign up  to stay updated on future episodes and events  Delve deeper into Voices of the Community Series on Arts & Culture, Making the Invisible-Visible, Covid-19's impact on nonprofits, small businesses and local government, City of Stockton's rise from the ashes of bankruptcy and our archives: You can explore episodes, speakers, organizations, and resources through each series web page. Watch and learn from all five series now!

Listen to ASCO's JCO Oncology Practice, Art of Oncology Practice article, "An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last” by Dr. David Johnson, who is a clinical oncologist at University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. The article is followed by an interview with Johnson and host Dr. Mikkael Sekeres. Through humor and irony, Johnson critiques how overspecialization and poor presentation practices have eroded what was once internal medicine's premier educational forum. Transcript Narrator: An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last, by David H. Johnson, MD, MACP, FASCO   Over the past five decades, I have attended hundreds of medical conferences—some insightful and illuminating, others tedious and forgettable. Among these countless gatherings, Medical Grand Rounds (MGRs) has always held a special place. Originally conceived as a forum for discussing complex clinical cases, emerging research, and best practices in patient care, MGRs served as a unifying platform for clinicians across all specialties, along with medical students, residents, and other health care professionals. Expert speakers—whether esteemed faculty or distinguished guests—would discuss challenging cases, using them as a springboard to explore the latest advances in diagnosis and treatment. During my early years as a medical student, resident, and junior faculty member, Grand Rounds consistently attracted large, engaged audiences. However, as medicine became increasingly subspecialized, attendance began to wane. Lectures grew more technically intricate, often straying from broad clinical relevance. The patient-centered discussions that once brought together diverse medical professionals gradually gave way to hyperspecialized presentations. Subspecialists, once eager to share their insights with the wider medical community, increasingly withdrew to their own specialty-specific conferences, further fragmenting the exchange of knowledge across disciplines. As a former Chair of Internal Medicine and a veteran of numerous MGRs, I observed firsthand how these sessions shifted from dynamic educational exchanges to highly specialized, often impenetrable discussions. One of the most striking trends in recent years has been the decline in presentation quality at MGR—even among local and visiting world-renowned experts. While these speakers are often brilliant clinicians and investigators, they can also be remarkably poor lecturers, delivering some of the most uninspiring talks I have encountered. Their presentations are so consistently lackluster that one might suspect an underlying strategy at play—an unspoken method to ensure that they are never invited back. Having observed this pattern repeatedly, I am convinced that these speakers must be adhering to a set of unwritten rules to avoid future MGR presentations. To assist those unfamiliar with this apparent strategy, I have distilled the key principles that, when followed correctly, all but guarantee that a presenter will not be asked to give another MGR lecture—thus sparing them the burden of preparing one in the future. Drawing on my experience as an oncologist, I illustrate these principles using an oncology-based example although I suspect similar rules apply across other subspecialties. It will be up to my colleagues in cardiology, endocrinology, rheumatology, and beyond to identify and document their own versions—tasks for which I claim no expertise. What follows are the seven “Rules for Presenting a Bad Medical Oncology Medical Grand Rounds.” 1.  Microscopic Mayhem: Always begin with an excruciatingly detailed breakdown of the tumor's histology and molecular markers, emphasizing how these have evolved over the years (eg, PAP v prostate-specific antigen)—except, of course, when they have not (eg, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, etc). These nuances, while of limited relevance to general internists or most subspecialists (aside from oncologists), are guaranteed to induce eye-glazing boredom and quiet despair among your audience. 2. TNM Torture: Next, cover every nuance of the newest staging system … this is always a real crowd pleaser. For illustrative purposes, show a TNM chart in the smallest possible font. It is particularly helpful if you provide a lengthy review of previous versions of the staging system and painstakingly cover each and every change in the system. Importantly, this activity will allow you to disavow the relevance of all previous literature studies to which you will subsequently refer during the course of your presentation … to wit—“these data are based on the OLD staging system and therefore may not pertain …” This phrase is pure gold—use it often if you can. NB: You will know you have “captured” your audience if you observe audience members “shifting in their seats” … it occurs almost every time … but if you have failed to “move” the audience … by all means, continue reading … there is more! 3. Mechanism of Action Meltdown: Discuss in detail every drug ever used to treat the cancer under discussion; this works best if you also give a detailed description of each drug's mechanism of action (MOA). General internists and subspecialists just LOVE hearing a detailed discussion of the drug's MOA … especially if it is not at all relevant to the objectives of your talk. At this point, if you observe a wave of slack-jawed faces slowly slumping toward their desktops, you will know you are on your way to successfully crushing your audience's collective spirit. Keep going—you are almost there. 4. Dosage Deadlock: One must discuss “dose response” … there is absolutely nothing like a dose response presentation to a group of internists to induce cries of anguish. A wonderful example of how one might weave this into a lecture to generalists or a mixed audience of subspecialists is to discuss details that ONLY an oncologist would care about—such as the need to dose escalate imatinib in GIST patients with exon 9 mutations as compared with those with exon 11 mutations. This is a definite winner! 5. Criteria Catatonia: Do not forget to discuss the newest computed tomography or positron emission tomography criteria for determining response … especially if you plan to discuss an obscure malignancy that even oncologists rarely encounter (eg, esthesioneuroblastoma). Should you plan to discuss a common disease you can ensure ennui only if you will spend extra time discussing RECIST criteria. Now if you do this well, some audience members may begin fashioning their breakfast burritos into projectiles—each one aimed squarely at YOU. Be brave … soldier on! 6. Kaplan-Meier Killer: Make sure to discuss the arcane details of multiple negative phase II and III trials pertaining to the cancer under discussion. It is best to show several inconsequential and hard-to-read Kaplan-Meier plots. To make sure that you do a bad job, divide this portion of your presentation into two sections … one focused on adjuvant treatment; the second part should consist of a long boring soliloquy on the management of metastatic disease. Provide detailed information of little interest even to the most ardent fan of the disease you are discussing. This alone will almost certainly ensure that you will never, ever be asked to give Medicine Grand Rounds again. 7. Lymph Node Lobotomy: For the coup de grâce, be sure to include an exhaustive discussion of the latest surgical techniques, down to the precise number of lymph nodes required for an “adequate dissection.” To be fair, such details can be invaluable in specialized settings like a tumor board, where they send subspecialists into rapturous delight. But in the context of MGR—where the audience spans multiple disciplines—it will almost certainly induce a stultifying torpor. If dullness were an art, this would be its masterpiece—capable of lulling even the most caffeinated minds into a stupor. If you have carefully followed the above set of rules, at this point, some members of the audience should be banging their heads against the nearest hard surface. If you then hear a loud THUD … and you're still standing … you will know you have succeeded in giving the world's worst Medical Grand Rounds!   Final Thoughts I hope that these rules shed light on what makes for a truly dreadful oncology MGR presentation—which, by inverse reasoning, might just serve as a blueprint for an excellent one. At its best, an outstanding lecture defies expectations. One of the most memorable MGRs I have attended, for instance, was on prostaglandin function—not a subject typically associated with edge-of-your-seat suspense. Given by a biochemist and physician from another subspecialty, it could have easily devolved into a labyrinth of enzymatic pathways and chemical structures. Instead, the speaker took a different approach: rather than focusing on biochemical minutiae, he illustrated how prostaglandins influence nearly every major physiologic system—modulating inflammation, regulating cardiovascular function, protecting the gut, aiding reproduction, supporting renal function, and even influencing the nervous system—without a single slide depicting the prostaglandin structure. The result? A room full of clinicians—not biochemists—walked away with a far richer understanding of how prostaglandins affect their daily practice. What is even more remarkable is that the talk's clarity did not just inform—it sparked new collaborations that shaped years of NIH-funded research. Now that was an MGR masterpiece. At its core, effective scientific communication boils down to three deceptively simple principles: understanding your audience, focusing on relevance, and making complex information accessible.2 The best MGRs do not drown the audience in details, but rather illuminate why those details matter. A great lecture is not about showing how much you know, but about ensuring your audience leaves knowing something they didn't before. For those who prefer the structured wisdom of a written guide over the ramblings of a curmudgeon, an excellent review of these principles—complete with a handy checklist—is available.2 But fair warning: if you follow these principles, you may find yourself invited back to present another stellar MGRs. Perish the thought! Dr. Mikkael SekeresHello and welcome to JCO's Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology, which features essays and personal reflections from authors exploring their experience in the oncology field. I'm your host, Mikkael Sekeres. I'm Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Hematology at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami.  What a pleasure it is today to be joined by Dr. David Johnson, clinical oncologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. In this episode, we will be discussing his Art of Oncology Practice article, "An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last."  Our guest's disclosures will be linked in the transcript.  David, welcome to our podcast and thanks so much for joining us. Dr. David JohnsonGreat to be here, Mikkael. Thanks for inviting me. Dr. Mikkael SekeresI was wondering if we could start with just- give us a sense about you. Can you tell us about yourself? Where are you from? And walk us through your career. Dr. David JohnsonSure. I grew up in a small rural community in Northwest Georgia about 30 miles south of Chattanooga, Tennessee, in the Appalachian Mountains. I met my wife in kindergarten. Dr. Mikkael SekeresOh my. Dr. David JohnsonThere are laws in Georgia. We didn't get married till the third grade. But we dated in high school and got married after college. And so we've literally been with one another my entire life, our entire lives. Dr. Mikkael SekeresMy word. Dr. David JohnsonI went to medical school in Georgia. I did my training in multiple sites, including my oncology training at Vanderbilt, where I completed my training. I spent the next 30 years there, where I had a wonderful career. Got an opportunity to be a Division Chief and a Deputy Director of, and the founder of, a cancer center there. And in 2010, I was recruited to UT Southwestern as the Chairman of Medicine. Not a position I had particularly aspired to, but I was interested in taking on that challenge, and it proved to be quite a challenge for me. I had to relearn internal medicine, and really all the subspecialties of medicine really became quite challenging to me. So my career has spanned sort of the entire spectrum, I suppose, as a clinical investigator, as an administrator, and now as a near end-of-my-career guy who writes ridiculous articles about grand rounds. Dr. Mikkael SekeresNot ridiculous at all. It was terrific. What was that like, having to retool? And this is a theme you cover a little bit in your essay, also, from something that's super specialized. I mean, you have had this storied career with the focus on lung cancer, and then having to expand not only to all of hematology oncology, but all of medicine. Dr. David JohnsonIt was a challenge, but it was also incredibly fun. My first few days in the chair's office, I met with a number of individuals, but perhaps the most important individuals I met with were the incoming chief residents who were, and are, brilliant men and women. And we made a pact. I promised to teach them as much as I could about oncology if they would teach me as much as they could about internal medicine. And so I spent that first year literally trying to relearn medicine. And I had great teachers. Several of those chiefs are now on the faculty here or elsewhere. And that continued on for the next several years. Every group of chief residents imparted their wisdom to me, and I gave them what little bit I could provide back to them in the oncology world. It was a lot of fun. And I have to say, I don't necessarily recommend everybody go into administration. It's not necessarily the most fun thing in the world to do. But the opportunity to deal one-on-one closely with really brilliant men and women like the chief residents was probably the highlight of my time as Chair of Medicine. Dr. Mikkael SekeresThat sounds incredible. I can imagine, just reflecting over the two decades that I've been in hematology oncology and thinking about the changes in how we diagnose and care for people over that time period, I can only imagine what the changes had been in internal medicine since I was last immersed in that, which would be my residency. Dr. David JohnsonWell, I trained in the 70s in internal medicine, and what transpired in the 70s was kind of ‘monkey see, monkey do'. We didn't really have a lot of understanding of pathophysiology except at the most basic level. Things have changed enormously, as you well know, certainly in the field of oncology and hematology, but in all the other fields as well. And so I came in with what I thought was a pretty good foundation of knowledge, and I realized it was completely worthless, what I had learned as an intern and resident. And when I say I had to relearn medicine, I mean, I had to relearn medicine. It was like being an intern. Actually, it was like being a medical student all over again. Dr. Mikkael SekeresOh, wow. Dr. David JohnsonSo it's quite challenging.  Dr. Mikkael SekeresWell, and it's just so interesting. You're so deliberate in your writing and thinking through something like grand rounds. It's not a surprise, David, that you were also deliberate in how you were going to approach relearning medicine. So I wonder if we could pivot to talking about grand rounds, because part of being a Chair of Medicine, of course, is having Department of Medicine grand rounds. And whether those are in a cancer center or a department of medicine, it's an honor to be invited to give a grand rounds talk. How do you think grand rounds have changed over the past few decades? Can you give an example of what grand rounds looked like in the 1990s compared to what they look like now? Dr. David JohnsonWell, I should all go back to the 70s and and talk about grand rounds in the 70s. And I referenced an article in my essay written by Dr. Ingelfinger, who many people remember Dr. Ingelfinger as the Ingelfinger Rule, which the New England Journal used to apply. You couldn't publish in the New England Journal if you had published or publicly presented your data prior to its presentation in the New England Journal. Anyway, Dr. Ingelfinger wrote an article which, as I say, I referenced in my essay, about the graying of grand rounds, when he talked about what grand rounds used to be like. It was a very almost sacred event where patients were presented, and then experts in the field would discuss the case and impart to the audience their wisdom and knowledge garnered over years of caring for patients with that particular problem, might- a disease like AML, or lung cancer, or adrenal insufficiency, and talk about it not just from a pathophysiologic standpoint, but from a clinician standpoint. How do these patients present? What do you do? How do you go about diagnosing and what can you do to take care of those kinds of patients? It was very patient-centric. And often times the patient, him or herself, was presented at the grand rounds. And then experts sitting in the front row would often query the speaker and put him or her under a lot of stress to answer very specific questions about the case or about the disease itself.  Over time, that evolved, and some would say devolved, but evolved into more specialized and nuanced presentations, generally without a patient present, or maybe even not even referred to, but very specifically about the molecular biology of disease, which is marvelous and wonderful to talk about, but not necessarily in a grand round setting where you've got cardiologists sitting next to endocrinologists, seated next to nephrologists, seated next to primary care physicians and, you know, an MS1 and an MS2 and et cetera. So it was very evident to me that what I had witnessed in my early years in medicine had really become more and more subspecialized. As a result, grand rounds, which used to be packed and standing room only, became echo chambers. It was like a C-SPAN presentation, you know, where local representative got up and gave a talk and the chambers were completely empty. And so we had to go to do things like force people to attend grand rounds like a Soviet Union-style rally or something, you know. You have to pay them to go. But it was really that observation that got me to thinking about it.  And by the way, I love oncology and I'm, I think there's so much exciting progress that's being made that I want the presentations to be exciting to everybody, not just to the oncologist or the hematologist, for example. And what I was witnessing was kind of a formula that, almost like a pancake formula, that everybody followed the same rules. You know, “This disease is the third most common cancer and it presents in this way and that way.” And it was very, very formulaic. It wasn't energizing and exciting as it had been when we were discussing individual patients. So, you know, it just is what it is. I mean, progress is progress and you can't stop it. And I'm not trying to make America great again, you know, by going back to the 70s, but I do think sometimes we overthink what medical grand rounds ought to be as compared to a presentation at ASH or ASCO where you're talking to subspecialists who understand the nuances and you don't have to explain the abbreviations, you know, that type of thing. Dr. Mikkael SekeresSo I wonder, you talk about the echo chamber of the grand rounds nowadays, right? It's not as well attended. It used to be a packed event, and it used to be almost a who's who of, of who's in the department. You'd see some very famous people who would attend every grand rounds and some up-and-comers, and it was a chance for the chief residents to shine as well. How do you think COVID and the use of Zoom has changed the personality and energy of grand rounds? Is it better because, frankly, more people attend—they just attend virtually. Last time I attended, I mean, I attend our Department of Medicine grand rounds weekly, and I'll often see 150, 200 people on the Zoom. Or is it worse because the interaction's limited? Dr. David JohnsonYeah, I don't want to be one of those old curmudgeons that says, you know, the way it used to be is always better. But there's no question that the convenience of Zoom or similar media, virtual events, is remarkable. I do like being able to sit in my office where I am right now and watch a conference across campus that I don't have to walk 30 minutes to get to. I like that, although I need the exercise. But at the same time, I think one of the most important aspects of coming together is lost with virtual meetings, and that's the casual conversation that takes place. I mentioned in my essay an example of the grand rounds that I attended given by someone in a different specialty who was both a physician and a PhD in biochemistry, and he was talking about prostaglandin metabolism. And talk about a yawner of a title; you almost have to prop your eyelids open with toothpicks. But it turned out to be one of the most fascinating, engaging conversations I've ever encountered. And moreover, it completely opened my eyes to an area of research that I had not been exposed to at all. And it became immediately obvious to me that it was relevant to the area of my interest, which was lung cancer. This individual happened to be just studying colon cancer. He's not an oncologist, but he was studying colon cancer. But it was really interesting what he was talking about. And he made it very relevant to every subspecialist and generalist in the audience because he talked about how prostaglandin has made a difference in various aspects of human physiology.  The other grand rounds which always sticks in my mind was presented by a long standing program director at my former institution of Vanderbilt. He's passed away many years ago, but he gave a fascinating grand rounds where he presented the case of a homeless person. I can't remember the title of his grand rounds exactly, but I think it was “Care of the Homeless” or something like that. So again, not something that necessarily had people rushing to the audience. What he did is he presented this case as a mysterious case, you know, “what is it?” And he slowly built up the presentation of this individual who repeatedly came to the emergency department for various and sundry complaints. And to make a long story short, he presented a case that turned out to be lead poisoning. Everybody was on the edge of their seat trying to figure out what it was. And he was challenging members of the audience and senior members of the audience, including the Cair, and saying, “What do you think?” And it turned out that the patient became intoxicated not by eating paint chips or drinking lead infused liquids. He was burning car batteries to stay alive and inhaling lead fumes, which itself was fascinating, you know, so it was a fabulous grand rounds. And I mean, everybody learned something about the disease that they might otherwise have ignored, you know, if it'd been a title “Lead Poisoning”, I'm not sure a lot of people would have shown up. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres That story, David, reminds me of Tracy Kidder, who's a master of the nonfiction narrative, will choose a subject and kind of just go into great depth about it, and that subject could be a person. And he wrote a book called Rough Sleepers about Jim O'Connell - and Jim O'Connell was one of my attendings when I did my residency at Mass General - and about his life and what he learned about the homeless. And it's this same kind of engaging, “Wow, I never thought about that.” And it takes you in a different direction.  And you know, in your essay, you make a really interesting comment. You reflect that subspecialists, once eager to share their insight with the wider medical community, increasingly withdraw to their own specialty specific conferences, further fragmenting the exchange of knowledge across disciplines. How do you think this affects their ability to gain new insights into their research when they hear from a broader audience and get questions that they usually don't face, as opposed to being sucked into the groupthink of other subspecialists who are similarly isolated? Dr. David Johnson That's one of the reasons I chose to illustrate that prostaglandin presentation, because again, that was not something that I specifically knew much about. And as I said, I went to the grand rounds more out of a sense of obligation than a sense of engagement. Moreover, our Chair at that institution forced us to go, so I was there, not by choice, but I'm so glad I was, because like you say, I got insight into an area that I had not really thought about and that cross pollination and fertilization is really a critical aspect. I think that you can gain at a broad conference like Medical Grand Rounds as opposed to a niche conference where you're talking about APL. You know, everybody's an APL expert, but they never thought about diabetes and how that might impact on their research. So it's not like there's an ‘aha' moment at every Grand Rounds, but I do think that those kinds of broad based audiences can sometimes bring a different perspective that even the speaker, him or herself had not thought of. Dr. Mikkael SekeresI think that's a great place to end and to thank David Johnson, who's a clinical oncologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School and just penned the essay in JCO Art of Oncology Practice entitled "An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last."  Until next time, thank you for listening to JCO's Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology. Don't forget to give us a rating or review, and be sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode. You can find all of ASCO's shows at asco.org/podcasts.  David, once again, I want to thank you for joining me today. Dr. David JohnsonThank you very much for having me. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.    Show notes: Like, share and subscribe so you never miss an episode and leave a rating or review.  Guest Bio: Dr David Johnson is a clinical oncologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School.

Viele Jugendliche wissen 80 Jahre nach Kriegsende mit dem Begriff „Holocaust“ nichts oder wenig anzufangen. Wir zeigen, warum das so ist und warum dich und uns alle das Thema heute mehr denn je betrifft. Und wie spannende und zeitgemäße Erinnerungskultur funktionieren kann.

Redaktorka Tamara Suchánková pro vás připravila další zajímavé povídání v našem pořadu "Na stole je téma. Tentokrát se zaměříme na Medjugorje, místo, které přitahuje poutníky z celého světa. Budeme si povídat s jednatelkou nové cestovní kanceláře Mgr. Barborou Němčákovou, která se již řadu let věnuje organizaci poutí do tohoto duchovního centra. Dozvíte se nejen o historii Medjugorje a jeho významu pro věřící, ale také o praktických aspektech poutí – jak vypadá cesta, co všechno můžete zažít a jaké jsou zkušenosti poutníků.

The ASX 200 fell for the second straight session, recovering from early lows, dropping 6 points to 8151 (-0.1%). Mixed sector performance. Healthcare worst performing sector. Pulled down by two biggest names. CSL (-2.5%) down as it flagged vaccine scepticism in US as a challenge. SIG (-6.7%) down after it took a $42.4m hit in transaction costs so far in FY25. Disappointment of WBC (-2.0%) earnings continued to weigh on Banks and broader index. CBA flat, Big Bank Basket down to $263.69 (0.6%). Other financials fared better. MQG (+0.8%) up as its conference kicked off. Also up are RPL (+0.9%), XYZ (+0.7%). REITs up as RBA rate decision draws nearer. Two weeks today. GMG up 0.2%, MGR up 0.9%. Tech more mixed. WTC down 2.2% as it stayed quiet on guidance give tariff difficulties. NXT jumped 8.3% as it smashed utilisation record on AI demand. Added to Growth on Friday.Want to invest with Marcus Today? The Managed Strategy Portfolio is designed for investors seeking exposure to our strategy while we do the hard work for you. If you're looking for personal financial advice, our friends at Clime Investment Management can help. Their team of licensed advisers operates across most states, offering tailored financial planning services.  Why not sign up for a free trial? Gain access to expert insights, research, and analysis to become a better investor.

The ASX 200 started the week giving back 80 points to 8158 (1%) as the bank rally faded post WBC results. Slightly underwhelming and lack of growth to blame. WBC fell 3.0% taking CBA down 1.6% and the Big Bank Basket down to $265.29 (1.7%). MQG followed the other lower down 1.8% ahead of numbers Friday. Other financials gave up early gains, with RPL and XYZ, two of the only winners. REITs also slipped led by GMG down 2.2% and MGR off 0.9% with industrials also weaker. Retail sagged, PMV down 3.4% and APE off 3.1% with MYR down 3.5%. Defensives such as TLS slid 1.1% and REA down 1.8%. Resources held up better with BHP down only 0.9% and RIO off 0.9% despite rising Iron ore prices in Singapore. Gold miners were mixed, GOR jumped 9.4% on the takeover by Goldfields, NST up 0.4% and EVN up 2.1% with BGL rallying 2.2%. Lithium stocks were flat, LYC up 1.8% and oil and gas stocks crumbling in the face of oils fall. WDS down 3.6% and STO off 4.0%. Uranium stocks mixed, NXG down 4.6% and BOE up 0.8%. In corporate news, TYR pulled out of SMP talks, PLY dumped after CEO retires wounded. RWC warned on tariffs and fell 2.4% with EDV forecasting flat to modest retail sales growth. Nothing on the economic front. In Asia, China and Japan closed for a holiday. 10-year yields pushing higher to 4.26%.Want to invest with Marcus Today? The Managed Strategy Portfolio is designed for investors seeking exposure to our strategy while we do the hard work for you. If you're looking for personal financial advice, our friends at Clime Investment Management can help. Their team of licensed advisers operates across most states, offering tailored financial planning services.  Why not sign up for a free trial? Gain access to expert insights, research, and analysis to become a better investor.

V 81. díle podcastu Stetoskop se s Mgr. Katarínou Chalásovou, Ph.D. podíváme na téma jejího výzkumu i její opravdové radosti z předávání vědomostí. Ukáže, že věda není jen o faktech, ale hlavně o otázkách, které si klademe a cestách, kterými se je snažíme pochopit. 

In this episode, BESLER Sr. Mgr. Meliza Weiner, gives a glimpse into BESLER's next Webinar, The Evolving Role of Case Management, live on May 7, 1 PM ET. 

Die Dönerpreise sind bodenlos und sorgen für Aufregung. Immer mehr Leute fordern: Dönerpreisbremse! Was das alles mit der Wirtschaftskrise zu tun hat und wie man die in den Griff kriegen könnte - wir finden es für dich raus.

Ist der Osterhase in Gefahr? Sein Kollege, der Feldhase, ist in Deutschland gefährdet und muss deshalb geschützt werden. Deshalb wird regelmäßig gezählt, wie viele Feldhasen es in Deutschland eigentlich gibt. Wie genau, das guckt sich Robert an. Welche Rolle Scheinwerfer dabei spielen? Und was man tun kann, damit es den Feldhasen besser geht? Das zeigt diese Folge von neuneinhalb!

Vandaag is het Goede Vrijdag. We stellen al onze vragen over de dienst van Goede Vrijdag aan Mgr. Van Looy.   De Bijbelvers voor vandaag is: Dit is Mijn gebod: dat Gij elkaar liefhebt, zoals Ik u heb liefgehad. – joh 15, 12  

Vandaag staan we stil bij de liturgie van Witte Donderdag, samen met Mgr. Koen Vanhoutte. De Bijbelvers voor deze Witte Donderdag is: Tot U roep ik, die mijn rots zijt. – Ps 28, 1  

Střídáním generací se mění nejen pohled na to, co je krásné. O kráse, mládí a nových technologií včetně novinky deep plane facelift si Cindy Kerberová, beauty direktorka Vogue CS, povídala s dvojicí plastických chirurgů. Pozvání do studia tentokrát přijali MUDr. Pavel Coufal a MUDr. Mgr. Richard Billich, Ph.D. z Perfect Clinic. 

Jak se stanovuje cena vody, proč máme tak drahou vodu a jak se investuje do infrastruktury? Na tyto otázky odpovídá tiskový mluvčí Severočeské vodárenské společnosti Mgr. Mario Böhme.Všechny díly podcastu Host Dopoledního expresu můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

Vieš, že naše trávenie neovplyvňuje len to, čo zjeme, ale aj to, v akom psychickom rozpoložení práve sme? V tejto epizóde sme sa s nutričnou terapeutkou Mgr. Karolínou Bezecnou, CFNC pozreli na to, ako stres ovplyvňuje tráviaci systém, hormonálne nastavenie aj náš výber jedla. Karolína vysvetľuje, prečo sa v strese mení naša chuť na jedlo, prečo siahneme po slanom a mastnom, a čo sa vtedy odohráva v tele. Zároveň ponúka praktické odporúčania, ako si pomôcť v každodennom živote – aj keď nemáš čas, nechutí ti jesť alebo nevieš, čo s častým nafukovaním. Ako vraví Karolína: „Stres nám odčerpá veľa mikronutrientov.“ Aj preto je dobré naučiť sa s ním lepšie pracovať. Zistíš tiež, čo robiť, keď sa stres odzrkadlí tráviacimi ťažkosťami ako zápcha či hnačka, a ako si nastaviť režim, ktorý podporí tvoje zdravie dlhodobo.   O čom sa rozprávame: 1:47 – Aký vplyv má spánok na trávenie a stres? 3:36 – Čo odporúča Karolína ľuďom, ktorí dlhodobo prežívajú stres? 8:04 – Čo všetko môže spôsobiť chronický stres v tráviacom systéme? 15:03 – Ako si rozumne naplánovať jedlo, aj keď máme nabitý deň? 16:23 – Ako sa zachovať, keď nás stres úplne „vypne“ a nechutí nám jesť? 20:03 – Prečo niekto v strese trpí zápchou a iný zasa hnačkou? 23:51 – Čo môžeme urobiť pre lepšie trávenie v bežnom živote? 26:10 – Je pravda, že rýchle jedenie spôsobuje nafukovanie? 29:46 – Ako ovplyvňuje stres náš pitný režim?   Zapni si túto epizódu a dozvieš sa, ako cez jednoduché návyky a vedomé spomalenie podporiť svoje trávenie aj celkovú pohodu. Tvoje telo ti poďakuje

Du 1er au 5 avril 2025, les évêques de France étaient réunis à Lourdes. Ils ont évoqué la lutte contre les violences sexuelles dans l'Eglise, et en particulier la prise en charge des victimes majeures. Un certain nombre de votes ont notamment conduit à l'élection de la nouvelle présidence des évêques. Mgr Aveline, cardinal archevêque de Marseille, succède à Mgr Éric de Moulins-Beaufort. Il sera entouré de deux vice-présidents, Mgr Benoît Bertrand, et Mgr Vincent Jordy. Pour faire le point sur cette assemblée plénière, RCF Tours accueille en duplex Mgr Vincent Jordy, évêque de Tours. Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Rund um Cannabis ranken sich viele Mythen: Es sei harmlos, weil es ja nur eine Pflanze sei; nach dem Kiffen sei man gut drauf. Und süchtig werde man davon eh nicht … oder? Was davon stimmt wirklich? Zusammen mit einer Gruppe Jugendlicher nehmen wir die gängigsten Mythen unter die Lupe.

Pokud máte pocit, že se všude kolem rojí jen špatné zprávy,máme pro vás vlídné povídání s psycholožkou, Mgr. et Mgr. Pavlou Kouckou. O tom, zda se rodičovská nejistota z krizí a složitých událostí ve světě může přenášet i na děti. Na jaké emoce jsou nejcitlivější, jak s nimi správně zacházet a kde hledat potřebnou pohodu?Pište nám na ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠nazory@sancedetem.cz⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ nebo na ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠facebookové stránce Šance Dětem⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, jaká témata by vás v rámci podcastu v budoucnu zajímala. Pokud má vaše dítě problémy nebo si složitým obdobím prochází celá rodina, pomoc najdete i na našem webu ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://sancedetem.cz⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

Syrien steht an einem krassen Punkt in seiner Geschichte: Nach 54 Jahren Diktatur und 13 Jahren Bürgerkrieg wurde Machthaber Baschar al-Assad gestürzt. Wie viele Menschen hoffen auch die 16-Jährige Abir und Journalist Borhan Akid auf einen echten Neuanfang für Syrien. Doch anhaltende Kämpfe lassen Zweifel an einem dauerhaften Frieden für alle aufkommen. Hier erfährst du, was aktuell im Land passiert und was die neue Regierung damit zu tun hat.

Wie wird ein Modellauto gemacht? Ein echtes Einsatzfahrzeug der Feuerwehr soll einen kleinen Doppelgänger bekommen: ein Spielzeug-Auto. Das Maus-Team zeigt Schritt für Schritt, wie aus den ersten Entwürfen mithilfe eines 3D-Druckers, Handarbeit und einer besonderen Maschine ein fertiges Modellauto wird…

Lootboxen in Games locken mit coolen Inhalten – aber das kann ganz schön teuer werden! Jana trifft den 16-jährigen Till, der lange Zeit viel Geld in sogenannte Packs bei EA Sports FC gesteckt hat. Mit welchen Mechaniken uns Spieleentwickler dazu animieren, immer mehr Geld auszugeben? Und ob man davon süchtig werden kann? Das erfährst du in dieser Folge.

Traurig, gestresst, einsam oder glücklich, stark und zufrieden? Luam geht der Frage nach, wie es um die mentale Gesundheit von Jugendlichen steht. Denn wir leben in herausfordernden Zeiten mit Kriegen und Krisen. Aber auch Schulstress und Zoff in der Familie können belasten. Gut, dass sich immer mehr junge Menschen trauen, über mentale Gesundheit zu sprechen. Was tut der Psyche gut und wann sollte man sich Hilfe suchen? neuneinhalb gibt Antworten!

100 Euro bei TEMU raushauen – Was dabei wohl rumkommt? Luam erlebt eine ganz neue Art des Onlineshoppings und stößt auf so genannte „Dark Patterns“, die uns dazu bringen sollen, immer mehr zu kaufen. Aber wie funktionieren diese Tricks? Wie sieht's mit der Qualität und Sicherheit der Produkte aus? Und was sind die negativen Folgen unseres Billigshoppens? Luam findet‘s raus!

காமராஜர், MGR டூ விபி சிங்-வருகை தந்த வெள்ளை மாளிகை சிவாஜியின் ஆன்மா - `அன்னை' இல்லத்தின் மறுபக்கம்

Host: Ray Loewe Guest: Brittany Hemperley, Mgr. of ...... Description: Brittany Hemperly manages Pursuits, the new Willow Valley shop that opened in North last October, in the space previously occupied by the Pharmacy/Drugstore. Rose Bahurka helps her during weekday shop hours from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm. Brittany describes the wide array of products available at Pursuits. Interviewer Ray Loewe could pick up cough syrup for his ailing wife. Cards, chocolates, candy bars, and other edibles such as cheese, crackers, and meats are sold there. Gifts like jewelry, purses, and bags are available. Dog leashes and cat toys are also sold. Best of all, several flavors of Fox Meadows Ice Cream are big sellers. Best of all, Resident suggestions for other products to be sold are taken into consideration.

Ďakujeme sponzorovi dnešného podcastu, ktorým je sýtený drink Cans, ktorý si môžete vychutnať úplne bez výčitiek! S našim kódom GGW15 máte 15% zľavu na ich e-shope www.cans.comPilotný diel nového formátu PÁROVÁ TERAPIA zahŕňa vaše najčastejšie otázky, ktoré ste adresovali odborníčke z oboru, párovej terapeutke z platformy ksebe.sk. V dnešnom dieli preberáme to, ako taká párová terapia (ne)vyzerá, ako rešpektujúco riešiť konflikty vo vzťahu a prelomiť zautomatizované a nefunkčné vzorce, ktoré pri hádkach často využívame, či sú ''jazyky lásky'' skutočne účinným nástrojom vo vzťahu a tiež aj konkrétne rady k tomu, ako vylepšiť celkovú komunikáciu.Exkluzívna dlhšia verzia tohto podcastu pre predplatiteľov HeroHero https://herohero.co/ggw

Für manche ist Schulsport das unwichtigste Fach ever, andere lieben ihn. Und dann liest man immer wieder, Schulsport sei nicht zuletzt wegen kaputter Turnhallen, fehlender Lehrkräfte und Stundenausfall in der Krise. Doch wie wichtig ist Schulsport eigentlich? Wir finden heraus, ob die Bedingungen beim Schulsport schuld daran sind, dass viele nicht rückwärtslaufen oder auf einem Bein balancieren können. Außerdem: Wie ist es, wenn an der Schule Sport zum Hauptfach und damit zu einem der wichtigsten Fächer wird? Das alles gibt es in dieser neuneinhalb-Folge.

André liebt alte schwarz-weiß-Sketche, in denen jemand auf einer Bananenschale ausrutscht, aber sind die Schalen wirklich so rutschig? An der RWTH Aachen forschen die Studierenden Zita und Amos dazu und untersuchen mit André die Reibung zwischen Boden und verschiedenen Obstschalen. Bananenschalen sind die rutschigsten und ein Blick ins Laser-Mikroskop zeigt auch, warum.

Odborná diskusia k dokumentu Pachová stopa, režisérky Zuzany Piussi, ktorý odhaľuje problematiku využívania pachových stôp ako dôkazného materiálu v českej justícii s porovnaním využívania týchto prostriedkov na Slovensku. Dokument sa zameriava na príbehy ľudí odsúdených výhradne na základe tejto metódy, ktorej vedecká podloženosť je v ČR veľmi sporná. Diskutujú: - Zuzana Piussi - režisérka - kpt. Mgr. Juraj Malík - vedúci oddelenia pachovej identifikácie odboru kynológie a hipológie Prezídia PZ - plk. v.v. Ing. Bc. Ján Varga - bývalý vedúci oddelenia - doc. JUDr. Radovan Blažek, PhD. z Katedry trestného práva, kriminológie a kriminalistiky Právnickej fakulty UK - Václav Peričevič - predseda spolku Šalamoun, protagonista filmu Moderuje: - Šimon Mach - advokát, člen Spolku Šalamoun

Am 23. Februar ist Bundestagswahl. Bei "neuneinhalb" machen wir dich fit dafür. Erfahre die Basics zur Wahl und höre, was Menschen wie du dazu sagen. Was wird überhaupt gewählt? Was haben eine Brombeere und die Flagge Kenias damit zu tun? Und welche Rolle spielt die Fünf-Prozent-Hürde? Die Antworten gibt's bei "neuneinhalb"!

In der Antarktis will Alexander Gerst mit seinem Team Meteoriten finden. Weil das Wetter nicht mitspielt, müssen sie einige Tage im Zelt verbringen. Als sich die Lage etwas bessert, können sie zwar noch keine Meteoriten suchen, aber dafür gibt es einen anderen Auftrag: Die Landebahn für Flugzeuge muss mit dem Schneemobil und einer Schneefräse wieder glatt gezogen werden. Kein Problem für Alexander Gerst, allerdings muss er dafür ganz schön viele Klamotten anziehen… Im letzten Teil der Sachgeschichte geht es für Alexander Gerst und sein Team endlich los. Nach langer Wartezeit im Lager macht sich das Forscherteam mit Schneemobilen auf den Weg. Dort, wo die Gletscher auf Berge treffen, ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, Meteoriten zu finden, am höchsten. Doch wie kann man einen Stein von einem Meteoriten unterscheiden? Und warum ist es überhaupt so wichtig, Meteoriten zu erforschen?

Heute kämpft Robert gegen das Vergessen - mit Schwamm und Lappen, mit einer Überlebensgeschichte und mit Hilfe einer besonderen App. Denn der 27. Januar ist der Tag des Gedenkens an die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus. An diesem Tag erinnern wir in Deutschland an die Millionen Menschen, die vor vielen Jahren von den Nationalsozialisten und Adolf Hitlers Regierung verfolgt, vertrieben oder sogar ermordet wurden. Doch wer waren diese Opfer? Und warum ist es so wichtig, ihre Lebensgeschichten heute noch zu erzählen? Darum geht es in dieser Folge.

Don McIntyre, founder of the GGR, OGR and now MGR, returns to the podcast! Andy sat down for a meandering conversation where they talk about meeting in Lagos, Portugal at the start of the Mini Globe Race, his philosophies on life, sailing and adventure, Don's definition of success, how he handles the 'haters' surrounding his ambitious events, how he pays for his crazy ideas and lots, lots more. -- ON THE WIND is presented by Forbes Yachts, the yacht sales professionals. Forbes Yachts sell the boats that allow you to effortlessly connect your passion for yachting to the sea, bringing your world one step closer to perfection. Visit forbesyachts.com to get in touch. -- ON THE WIND is also supported by Boat Doctor, powering life on the water. Boat Doctor designs high-powered, off-grid energy systems for boats, RVs and other off-grid applications. To find out more, go to boatdrusa.com.

Über TikTok gibt's 'ne Menge Vorurteile. Vor allem, wenn es darum geht, sich auf der Plattform zu aktuellen Themen zu informieren. Da heißt es oft „unseriös!“ oder sogar „gefährlich!“. Dabei kann man schon gute Infos auf TikTok finden - wenn man weiß, wie und ein paar Dinge beachtet. Tessniem macht den Test auf TikTok und trifft Lara, die eine echte Expertin für die Plattform ist. Was sie für Profi-Tipps hat? Und wie man gute und sichere Informationen auf TikTok findet? Das sieht man in dieser Folge neuneinhalb.

Wintersport ohne Schnee - wie soll das gehen? Durch die Klimakrise schneit es immer weniger, und das ist besonders für Profi-Wintersportlerinnen und -sportler ein echtes Problem. Deshalb lassen sich Wintersportzentren wie das thüringische Oberhof so einiges einfallen. Hier besucht Reporterin Tessniem die beiden Langlauf-Talente Emma und Magnus. Wie die beiden Langlauf auch ohne Schnee trainieren? Woher der Schnee kommt, wenn er nicht vom Himmel fällt? Und wie man es schafft, dass Schnee selbst im Sommer nicht schmilzt? Das und mehr zeigt diese Folge neuneinhalb.

Oskar ist verliebt: Als er im Geschäft auf ein Mädchen trifft, das dieselben Weltraum-Sammelbildchen mag wie er, ist es um ihn geschehen. Doch wie kann er sie bloß auf sich aufmerksam machen? Mit einem Raumanzug gewinnt er zwar nicht ihre Liebe, aber dafür etwas anderes, was er sich schon lange gewünscht hat…

Hostem této epizody je Jeho Excelence Mons. Mgr. Josef Nuzík, 15. arcibiskup olomoucký a metropolita moravský. V tomto rozhovoru se podíváme na jeho životní cestu – od dětství v početné rodině s 11 sourozenci významné události, které ho formovaly, až po současnost. Povídáme si o jeho zájmech, zkušenostech po roce ve funkci arcibiskupa a také se blíže seznámíme s olomouckou arcidiecézí. Hlavním tématem poté bude Jubilejní rok 2025 – Rok Naděje.

Die Weltpremiere von „Pit und Peggs“ zeigt, wie die 90 Jahre alte Vision eines Trickfilms von Felix Nussbaum und Michael Loewen vollendet wurde. In der fantasievollen Geschichte machen Pit und Peggs im Traum eine rasante Fahrt mit ihrem Auto durch die Berge. Dabei treffen sie nicht nur andere Autofahrer, sondern auch eine Giraffe, lebende Tanksäulen und Sonnenblumen – und gewinnen zum Schluss sogar einen Preis.

In this episode, Meliza Weiner, BESLER's Sr. Mgr. of Revenue Cycle, provides us with a glimpse into free webinar, Medicare Advantage: Key Trends in 2025, live on Wed., Jan. 29, at 1 PM ET.

In einer Kita in Ravensburg gibt es Risse in den Wänden. Denn ein Teil des Gebäudes ist ein kleines Stück abgesackt. Das Maus-Team schaut sich an, wieso das passiert ist und wie man die Kita ganz ohne Muskelkraft wieder anheben kann. Bodenproben verraten, dass der Boden unter der Kita zu trocken geworden ist und sich deshalb zusammengezogen hat. Doch wie kann der Boden wieder so stabil gemacht werden, dass die Kita problemlos darauf stehen kann? Mit einigen Rohren, einer Pistole und zwei ganz besonderen Flüssigkeiten…

Wie werden Äpfel richtig gelagert? Es ist Winter und Jana besucht ein weiteres Mal Familie Nachtwey auf dem Biohof, um zu sehen, was bei der Lagerung von Äpfeln besonders wichtig ist. Nachdem die Äpfel sortiert und in großen Kisten gepackt wurden, werden die Tore der Lagerhalle besonders dicht verschlossen. Jana findet heraus, wie der Reifeprozess der Äpfel mit einer Art „Winterschlaf“ verhindert werden kann und was das mit den Löchern auf dem Apfel, den Lentizellen, zu tun hat…

Orion – das ist der Name des nächsten Raumschiffes, das Menschen zum Mond bringen wird. Astronaut Alexander Gerst erklärt, wie dieses Raumschiff aufgebaut ist, wo die Astronaut:innen sitzen und was im Raumschiff auf keinen Fall fehlen darf. Und dann zeigt er mithilfe eines Modells noch, wie weit der Mond von der Erde entfernt ist. Im Vergleich zur Raumstation ISS ist das ein ganz schön langer Weg… Wie wird ein Raumschiff gebaut? Im zweiten Teil der Sachgeschichte besucht Alexander Gerst eine Firma in Bremen, in der ein Teil des Orion-Raumschiffs hergestellt wird. In einem „Rein-Raum“, in dem strenge Hygiene-Vorschriften gelten, schaut er sich die einzelnen Bauplätze ganz genau an – vom Rohbau bis hin zur äußeren Hülle des Raumschiffs. Und er verrät, wie das Raumschiff nach der Mission eigentlich wieder vom Mond weg kommt… Im dritten Teil der Sachgeschichte geht es darum, wie der Flug zum Mond abläuft und warum eine solche Mission wichtig ist. Doch bevor es überhaupt losgehen kann, wird ein Testflug mit Dummys gemacht. Erst nach dem erfolgreichen Versuch können Astronaut:innen zu dieser ganz besonderen Reise aufbrechen und wichtige Erkenntnisse über den Mond sammeln…

Für viele Familien gehört sie zum Weihnachtsbaum fest dazu: Die Lichterkette. Aber wie wird die eigentlich hergestellt? Das Maus-Team ist in Coburg und schaut sich die einzelnen Stationen im Herstellungs-Prozess einmal genau an. Denn sie sind dabei, wenn die letzte Lichterkette in diesem Jahr produziert wird…

We perform our due diligence by playing through the two DLC missions for MGR. Both are pretty inoffensive outside of some bad platforming and some S-Rank Metal Gear style horniness, so there's not too much to dive into in terms of story or characters. Thankfully Danny assembled some very thought provoking questions to get us thinking through our feelings about the Metal Gear Solid series as a whole, including the very important question: who would you want in your dream and nightmare blunt rotations? Next time we're going to the movies! We'll be discussing John Carpenter's 1981 classic: Escape from New York! Episode 49: Metal Gear Madlibs

Wenn man beim Bowlen nicht alle Pins trifft, werden nur die übrig gebliebenen automatisch wieder aufgestellt. Aber wie funktioniert das eigentlich? André macht sich auf zu einer Firma, die Bowling-Anlagen herstellt und wirft dort einen Blick hinter die Kulissen. Dabei lüftet er auch das Geheimnis, wie die Kugeln nach einem Wurf zurück zu den Spielern kommen…

Was passiert, wenn man mit einem Gesetz nicht einverstanden ist? Das will Clarissa herausfinden und trifft Marlene, die 2019 eine Beschwerde beim Bundesverfassungsgericht eingelegt hat. Doch bevor Clarissa versteht, was nun mit Marlenes Anliegen passiert, will sie wissen, wie das Bundesverfassungsgericht überhaupt arbeitet. Im zweiten Teil der Sachgeschichte schaut sich Clarissa an, wie eine Beschwerde im Bundesverfassungsgericht bearbeitet wird: Wer entscheidet über einen Fall und wie kann eine solche Entscheidung getroffen werden? Und was hat ein Beschluss des Bundesverfassungsgerichtes mit einer Oblate zu tun?