Podcast appearances and mentions of peter koenig

Dans ce 127e épisode,je fais la synthèse du livre « 30 mensonges sur l'argent » écrit par Peter Koenig en 2008 àpartir de cinq éléments clés à retenir :1. L'argent fait lebonheur2. L'argent est garanti3. Les riches et les pauvres4. Promesse d'une retraite paisible5. L'argent… c'est ceque vous en pensez! Abonne-toi pour soutenir montravail et obtenir un épisode supplémentaire chaque mois : https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/financesfondamentales/subscribe Je t'invite aussi à suivrela page Facebook « Finances Fondamentales - éducation et investissement » pouravoir accès à l'image synthèse de l'épisode et pour me poser tes questions.Page Facebook : ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100088196588852⁠⁠⁠⁠ Page instagram dupodcast : https://www.instagram.com/finances.fondamentales/?hl=fr Chaque matin, lebalado InfoBref résume l'actualité en 5 minutes: https://spoti.fi/3SiIdmeL'infolettre qui donnel'essentiel des nouvelles en 5 minutes: https://infobref.com/ff Gmail: ⁠⁠⁠⁠Financesfondamentales@gmail.com⁠⁠⁠⁠ Clausede non-responsabilitéInvestir comporte des risques deperte. Ce podcast est uniquement à des fins d'information et ne doit pas êtreconsidéré comme un conseil en investissement personnalisé ou être utilisé pourprendre des décisions d'investissement. L'animateur du podcast peut détenir despositions dans les titres discutés.L'animateur du podcast reçoit despaiements de diverses entités pour des publicités. L'inclusion de tellespublicités ne constitue ni n'implique une approbation, un parrainage ou unerecommandation de ceux-ci, ou toute affiliation avec ceux-ci. Lesinvestissements dans des titres comportent des risques de perte. Toute mentiond'un titre particulier et des données de performance associées ne constitue pasune recommandation d'acheter ou de vendre ce titre. Les informations fourniessur le podcast ne sont pas destinées à un investisseur ou à une catégoried'investisseurs spécifiques et sont fournies uniquement à titre d'informationgénérale.Évidemment, rien sur ce podcast nedoit être considéré comme un conseil financier personnalisé ou unesollicitation d'achat ou de vente de titres. Pour tout conseil spécifique,veuillez consulter un professionnel. L'animateur du podcast ne peut être tenuresponsable de vos décisions financières.

TRANSLATION MENU: LOOK UPPER RIGHT BELOW THE SOCIAL MEDIA ICONS. IT OFFERS EVERY LANGUAGE AVAILABLE AROUND THE WORLD! ALSO, SOCIAL MEDIA AND PRINT ICONS ARE AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS POST! Pictured above: Peter Koenig on the left and yours truly on the right. Sixteen years on the streets, living and working with the people...

(Repeat Broadcast) This week, on the Global Research News Hour, we are addressing the wildfires that have ravaged much of the forests of Canada, along with Maui and other places and the tendency to blame it all on Climate Change. We ask if there are other interests at stake which are using the fight against Climate Change as a mask. In our first half hour, we speak to Peter Koenig about the prospect of elites having the ability and the motive to cash in on a devastated planet and advance the prospects of the World Ecoomic Forum's Great Reset . And in our second half hour, we talk to Alberta Professor Anthony Hall about how climate change fakery is driving increasing divides between Alberta and the rest of Canada.

Il existe trois mouvements possibles qui reflètent notre relation à l'argent. Ces trois mouvements ont été mis en avant par Peter Koenig. Dans son livre « Ce que l'argent dit de vous », Christian Junod les développe et donne divers exemples. Cette semaine nous avions envie de développer ces trois mouvements avec vous en y ajoutant notre touche personnelle : -          La tendance écureuil qui implique « J'amasse de l'argent, pièce par pièce ou à coup de centaines, milliers ou millions » -          La tendance repousseur qui implique « Je fais en sorte que l'argent n'arrive pas à moi et je le repousse » -          La tendance montagne russe qui implique « J'amasse et m'en débarrasse » Le tout est lié à la vision (positive ou négative) que les personnes ont de l'argent. Bonne écoute !     www.money-mindset.be

GUEST OVERVIEW: Peter Koenig worked for over 30 years with the World Bank, including 10 years in a Cooperative Program with WHO, in Environmental Health. As a macro-economist, specialized in water resources, his work took him to some 70 countries around the globe. It also gave him the rare opportunity to observe as an “insider” how these so-called UN agencies and the UN system at large operates: who finances them, who influences them and to whose tune they dance.

This week, on the Global Research News Hour, as a new bill got through the US House of Representatives in April allocating $61 billion devoted supposedly to Ukraine, we inspect the fine details of this and another less explored bill on the dynamics of the bloody War in Ukraine and examine the consequences for the victory or finality of Ukraine. For most of the hour we speak with author, radio host and economics teacher Jack Rasmus about the expected result of the bills passing through Congress, and the comparative positions of Ukraine, Russia and NATO geostrategically. Then toward the end of our show we chat with geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig about the wider implications and about the “Wars for Peace” rule which continues to captivate people everywhere.

Eric Larchevêque, entrepreneur à succès et cofondateur de Ledger, il est désormais très connu du grand public pour l'émission "qui veut être mon associé". C'est aussi l'auteur d'un ouvrage "entreprendre pour être libre". J'ai rencontré Eric il y a un peu plus de 10 ans et j'ai toujours aimé le bonhomme, nous avons ici une conversation intime sur son enfance, ses échecs et ses réussites. Nous parlons aussi beaucoup d'argent puisque sans secret, sa fortune, estimée à plus de trois cents millions d'euros, mais cela ne l'a pas empêché de rester fidèle à ses valeurs et à sa quête incessante de liberté, un thème qu'il aborde d'ailleurs dans son livre "Entreprendre pour être libre". Dans cette conversation, Eric se confie sur son parcours, depuis son enfance rurale jusqu'aux défis de l'entreprenariat, en passant par son rapport à l'argent et la manière dont sa famille façonne sa vision du monde. Nous abordons évidemment de nombreux thèmes et en particulier les sacrifices familiaux, l'importance de l'éducation de ses enfants, sa résilience personne, les impacts psychologiques de l'héritage familial et bien sûr, un tout petit peu de bitcoin mais nous avions fait un épisode dédié il y a des années, presque au début de ce podcast il y a 6 ans. Explorons ensemble les convictions qui le mènent aujourd'hui à accompagner d'autres entrepreneurs et sa perspective sur l'éducation de ses enfants dans une ère de privilèges. Prêts pour une plongée profonde dans l'esprit d'un homme qui a traversé le succès et l'épreuve avec une résilience remarquable ? Restez avec nous pour une conversation des plus éclairantes avec Eric Larchevêque. Les principales questions que l'on traite : 1. Comment Eric Larchevêque relie-t-il sa quête de liberté à l'histoire de son père et à ses propres choix entrepreneuriaux ? 2. Quelle est la perspective d'Eric sur l'égoïsme dans l'entrepreneuriat et comment concilie-t-il cela avec sa vie familiale ? 3. Comment Eric définit-il la chance dans le contexte de l'entrepreneuriat et quelle importance accorde-t-il à la préparation pour saisir les opportunités ? 4. Quelles sont les qualités qu'Eric juge essentielles pour être un bon entrepreneur et pourquoi l'écoute serait-elle l'une d'entre elles ? 5. En quoi les échecs personnels d'Eric, comme la période difficile en 2010 ou ses pertes financières, ont-ils façonné sa vision de la réussite et sa résilience ? 6. Quelle est l'importance de l'empathie dans les investissements d'Eric, et comment ces qualités influencent-elles ses choix ? 7. Comment la relation d'Eric avec sa femme et ses enfants a-t-elle évolué au fil de sa carrière d'entrepreneur et quel rôle jouent-ils dans son succès ? 8. Pourquoi Eric estime-t-il que tout le monde ne peut pas devenir entrepreneur et quels sacrifices sont nécessaires pour y parvenir ? 9. Quelle est la vision d'Eric sur l'éducation de ses enfants, particulièrement en termes de socialisation et de mixité sociale, et comment balance-t-il privilège et responsabilité ? 10. Comment Eric envisage-t-il l'impact de ses succès entrepreneuriaux sur ses enfants et quels enseignements espère-t-il leur transmettre par rapport à l'argent et à la réussite ? Timelaps : 00:00 Discussion avec Eric Larchevêque sur l'entrepreneuriat. 08:28 Artiste d'opéra inspire talent avec rigueur. 15:45 Relation saine avec l'argent, succès entrepreneurial. 17:23 Relation complexe, argent et plaisir des vacances. 26:08 Éducation des enfants dans le luxe avec responsabilité. 31:45 Oui, non, dérives sectaires en France, internat. 35:36 Expérience de lycée trouve sa force. 40:41 Chercher un nouveau projet pour aider. 44:19 L'exécution compte plus que l'idée seule. 49:36 Pragmatique, humble, réflexion profonde, décision difficile. 58:56 Tout le monde ne peut pas être entrepreneur. 01:00:26 Investissement dans les livres anciens, aventure incroyable. Suggestion d'autres épisodes à écouter : Vlan #61 L'impact sociétal des cryptomonnaies avec Eric Larcheveque (https://audmns.com/nprEvEX) Vlan #62 Rendre possible l'entrepreneuriat en banlieues populaires avec Moussa Camara (https://audmns.com/cJXTgZH) [BONUS IN ENGLISH] How to change your relationship to money with Peter Koenig (https://audmns.com/LpSmRKt)

This week, on the Global Research News Hour a week after the conclusion of Davos24 we are focused on the battle against Climate Change and the mechanism of the World Economic Forum that puts the world's wealthiest figures in the driving seat. For the majority of our hour, we speak to Geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig and to environmental activist and to organic farmer Julian Rose about their skepticism toward the human role in generating climate change and about how climate action as prescribed by the World Economic Forum will not so much save the planet as feed the rich. Toward the end of our show, Elizabeth Woodworth, another Global Research contributor who supports the scientific consensus on climate change expresses her concerns about elevating the role of corporate interests, including big oil, ahead of respecting and defending democratic States around the world.

TRANSLATION MENU: LOOK UPPER RIGHT BELOW THE SOCIAL MEDIA ICONS. IT OFFERS EVERY LANGUAGE AVAILABLE AROUND THE WORLD! By Jeff J. Brown Pictured above: Peter on the right and yours truly on the left. Sixteen years on the streets, living and working with the people of China, Jeff Downloadable podcast at the bottom of this...

Comment notre relation à l'argent façonne-t-elle nos vies ? Ancien conseiller financier, Christian Junod partage son parcours marqué par un changement radical de carrière après un licenciement durant la crise des subprimes. Influencé par les enseignements de Peter Koenig sur la relation à l'argent, Christian a transformé son approche personnelle et professionnelle de la finance. Désormais, il aide les autres à pacifier leur rapport à l'argent, le transformant en un outil au service de leurs projets de vie. Au fil de cet épisode, Christian révèle comment il a surmonté ses propres peurs et insécurités financières et comment il guide à présent autrui vers une sérénité financière. Le podcast explore des sujets variés comme les croyances limitantes autour de l'argent, l'importance de l'amour de soi et son lien avec notre gestion financière ainsi que l'influence des loyautés familiales sur notre rapport à l'argent. Christian offre des conseils pratiques et des exercices simples pour transformer notre approche de l'argent. Cet épisode est une invitation à repenser notre relation à l'argent, pour qu'elle devienne une source de liberté et de joie, plutôt qu'une cause d'anxiété et de restriction. Références Peter Koenig Épisode 49. Le dépassement de soi - Sylvaine Cussot Renaître (Documentaire) - Tistrya Ce que l'argent dit de vous ! - Christian Junod Christian Junod https://cjunodconseil.com/ https://www.youtube.com/@ChristianJunod Une note 5⭐️ et un petit commentaire sur Apple Podcast ou Spotify aide beaucoup ❤️ Merci de continuer à me suivre, toujours ouverte à vos retours

Laissez un message vocal à Catherine ou à Olivier en suivant ce lien vers la plateforme Vodio (c'est gratuit). N'oubliez pas de mentionner si vous nous autorisez à utiliser votre message et votre voix dans un prochain épisode pour vous répondre.Dans ce nouvel épisode du podcast "Entr'Nous" du Love Health Center, Olivier Mageren, sexologue, reçoit Catherine Burton pour partager des idées pour créer une relation de couple consciente.Catherine Burton, avocate spécialisée dans les règlement amiable et médiatrice agréée, notamment en matière familiale, a pour plus grande motivation et mission d'oeuvrer pour un monde paisible.De permettre aux gens de prendre conscience de leur capacité à trouver des accords même avec les personnes avec lesquelles ils sont le plus en colère...Elle s'est inspirée entre-autres de Peter Koenig sur les principes sources dans le "Love in Business". Catherine s'est formée avec Giorgios Bouronikos à l'Ennéagramme et s'attache à l'importante mission de transposer ces approches riches et positives aux relations de couples... De la personne source à l'acceptation du doute, Catherine Burton nous présente les 6 principes de base simples, mais puissants, pour créer des relations de couple (mais aussi des relations professionnelles au sein des organisations) plus pacifiques et plus prospères...Catherine nous donne plusieurs exemples de la façon dont ces principes peuvent être appliqués. Elle raconte comment elle les a utilisés pour résoudre un conflit dans son propre vécu, et comment elle peux aider d'autres couples et organisations à faire de même.Si vous êtes intéressés d'améliorer vos relations, nous ne pouvons que vous encourager à écouter cet épisode.Catherine Burton nous offre un outil puissant qui peut nous aider à créer des vies plus épanouissantes et elle vous propose un exercice à faire dès maintenant : Écoutez cette capsule pour en savoir plusSéquençage du podcast :[00:00:19] Introduction[00:00:33] Présentation de Catherine[00:01:53] Intention de l'épisode[00:03:06] Les outils : le "Love in Business" et l'ennéagramme[00:07:16] Changer notre perspective et oser regarder les choses autrement[00:08:45] Les principes sources dans un couple[00:24:30] Accepter le doute et se référer à la personne source[00:27:04] La personne source prend des risques[00:28:40] Gratitudes[00:30:07] Clôture de l'épisodeLiens Bonus:B Just, cabinet d'avocats et de médiation : B-JustLa puissance des principes Source - Peter Koenig (vidéo sur Youtube)Blog de Peter Koenig

This week, on the Global Research News Hour, we are addressing the wildfires that have ravaged much of the forests of Canada, along with Maui and other places and the tendency to blame it all on Climate Change. We ask if there are other interests at stake which are using the fight against Climate Change as a mask. In our first half hour, we speak to Peter Koenig about the prospect of elites having the ability and the motive to cash in on a devastated planet and advance the prospects of the World Ecoomic Forum's Great Reset . And in our second half hour, we talk to Alberta Professor Anthony Hall about how climate change fakery is driving increasing divides between Alberta and the rest of Canada.

This week on the global Research News Hour we continue our journey into the latest adventures into the new artificial intelligence research that is taking the world by storm and firing up the imaginations of politicians, military individuals and corporate leaders alike and see how far that takes us down the techno-autocratic hole. In our first half hour, we will hear from writer Karsten Riise about how AI has finally put the US ahead of China and Russia as a true game changer, and how its enormous impacts will soon shape a new geopolitical frontier. And in our second half hour, we are joined again by geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig who investigates the trajectory the human species is on that leads us to dark and tragic endings beyond COVID and into the Great Reset.

Aujourd'hui, nous allons voir ensemble à quel point les choix conscients ou inconscients impactent nos finances.Cet épisode est basé sur les travaux de l'économiste Peter Koenig et le livre "Ce que l'argent dit de vous" de Christian Junod.Je te souhaite une bonne écoute.Si cet épisode t'a plu, tu peux me laisser 5 étoiles sur les plateformes de diffusion et me dire ce que cela t'inspire en commentaire.Et tu peux me retrouver sur mes autres canaux de communication : Mon blog : https://moneyetmindset.com/ Sur Instagram : Vanessa.MoneyMindset Ma newsletter : https://systeme.io/newsletter/share/1545347d5285df06003053afe2daf01e7b75bMa page YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyMLFz7nNs7hmECldNwcoEw?sub_confirmation=1

This week, on the Global Research News Hour, as yet another banking institution is in trouble, we reassess the dangers of further troubles spreading across the nation and ascertain the dilemma facing both the giant banks as well as the humble households of America. In our first half hour, Geo political analyst Peter Koenig speaks of his vision of these bank failures actually being coordinated to help move forward plans to digitize all currency well before the end of the decade. Then in our second half hour, we will hear from Economic thinker and journalist Dr Jack Rasmus about the fundamentals of what happened to Silvergate Capital and Silicon Valley Bank last month, and what may be in store for more banks as the qualifiers continue to go unaddressed.

(l'épisode est en anglais) Peter Koenig est un économiste mais surtout un coach sur la relation à l'argent, en réalité il est LE coach recommandé par Deepak Chopra entre autre. Peter est sans doute la personne la plus connue sur le sujet de la relation à l'argent, le coach des coaches grosso modo et j'ai eu la chance de pouvoir discuter avec lui pendant 1h de ce sujet qui est, en réalité central dans nos vies. Ca aurait été dommage de s'en priver même si vous ne parlez pas tous anglais, j'en ai conscience. Essayez quand même si vous le pouvez cela en vaut le coût! Nous avons presque tous comme rêve de devenir riche, que l'argent ne soit plus un problème, de gagner au loto ou à l'euromillions, de devenir millionnaire. Nous regardons parfois avec envie ceux qui ont, d'ailleurs c'est de cette manière dont on défini le succès dans notre société. Pourquoi avons nous la sensation que nous avons besoin d'argent pour être libre et en sécurité? Comment avoir une relation saine à l'argent? Peut on imaginer une société sans argent? Est-ce que l'argent peut vraiment rendre heureux? Qu'est ce que l'argent permet de faire réellement. C'est une partie des questions que l'on discute avec Peter et de nombreuses autres. Suggestion d'autres épisodes à écouter : [BONUS IN ENGLISH] How can we solve our "meaning" crisis? with Jamie Wheal (https://audmns.com/AFdXJKO) Vlan #92 (

Agnes is a therapist, trainer, and coach working with change-makers who feel overwhelmed, burned out or stuck to support them in finding their resilience and creative power. Coming from a background in the not-for-profit sector and international development, with a focus on climate change, gender and social inequality, she started the Good Jungle to connect the worlds of beyond-profit organisations and activism with the emerging meeting place between psychology, neuroscience and contemplative practice.   As a therapist Agnes works in private practice and organisational settings. She also works with groups and individuals on their relationship to money using Peter Koenig's powerfully transformative ‘Money Work', which draws on Jungian ideas on shadow and the unconscious.   Born and raised in Vienna, Austria, Agnes now lives in Brighton in the United Kingdom with her family. With roots all over Europe and experience living and working in various parts of the world, Agnes is very interested in intercultural and migratory life experiences and the questions of identity and belonging they bring.   Additionally, I'll be donating to and raising awareness for the charity or organization of my guest's choice with each episode now. This episode, the organization is called the Allsorts Youth Project. Any and all donations make a difference! You can connect with Agnes on: Website LinkedIn Twitter Her writing, on Medium Her talk on how to be a change maker To connect with me: Interested in working with me as your coach? Book a complimentary 15 minute call here. LinkedIn Instagram Website Subscribe to my weekly newsletter YouTube Please leave a review for this podcast on Apple Podcasts!   Resources/People Mentioned: The Wild Edge of Sorrow - Francis Weller How Can I Help? - Ram Dass My Grandmother's Hands - Resmaa Menakem The Drama Triangle Carl Jung - Shadow Stephen Porges Jim Hollingshead Peter Hussey Peter Koenig Deb Dana Nadjeschda Taranczewski CU Money - Money Work Course

Erik is an executive advisor on transformation and the future of work, leadership, and collaboration, and the author of ‘Teal Dots in an Orange World.' We talk about how this 'new ways of working' movement is evolving, and in particular a positive trend that Erik calls 'fragmented organisations' that's happening because it's hard to scale self-managed or 'teal' practices and principles in a uniform way. Erik shares what he has observed, particularly in larger organisations, including challenges like interfacing with the outside world when you are a progressive organisation. Finally, we explore leadership and 'futures literacy' as an important skill. I love Erik's articulate and thoughtful style and I think this was a great sense-making conversation. Resources: Erik's book, ‘Teal Dots in an Orange World' The HBR article ‘Managing the whitespace' Bill Anderson talking about transformation at scale at Roche, on the Brave New Work podcast Related Leadermorphosis episodes: The episode with Peter Koenig about Source The episode with Tom Nixon about Source The books Erik mentioned: ‘Imaginable' by Jane McGonical ‘Transforming the Future: Anticipation in the 21st Century' by Riel Miller et al.

Peter Koenig has been creating an alternate reality for many years. Today he is creating a movement which is transforming business through love. His "Money & Business Partnership Congress" is set to reshape our ideas of business and love, combining them in a way that's sure to change the world. #peterkoenig #MoneyandBusinessPartnershipCongress #livelovegive #commonsense #inspiration #possibilities #breakthrough #emotionalintelligence #fulfilment #empowerment #authenticity #freedom #lifelessons #courage #consciousness #wisdom #selfawareness #trustyourself #growthmindset #habits #transformation #personaldevelopment #talkshow

✨ Prêt.es à vivre une  « vraie »  transformation ? De celle qui élève les consciences, libère les potentialités et transcende les égos au service d'un projet commun qui fait sens ? Alors écoutez Laurent Ledoux que j'ai eu le plaisir de recevoir dans Outside of the box. Laurent est à la croisée de plusieurs mondes : celui de l'entreprise, de la sagesse et de la philosophie. Catalyseur et accélérateur de transformations depuis plus de 20 ans au sein et au service de grandes et moyennes organisations, publiques et privées, il a aussi fondé l'Association PhiloMa pour « féconder le management par la philosophie ». Laurent a présidé le ministère belge de la Mobilité et des Transports après avoir été chef de cabinet d'un ministre, directeur associé chez Arthur D. Little et membre d'un comité exécutif de BNP Paribas Fortis. Il a ensuite fondé et dirigé les cabinets Equis et Phusis, tous 2 spécialisés dans l'accompagnement des transformations. Laurent fait partie de ces hommes brillants, humbles, éclairés et éclairants qui incarnent leur parole. Dans cet épisode, sa grande expérience des transformations et sa spiritualité incarnée nous aideront à baliser le chemin de crête des transformations authentiques et réussies en entremêlant spiritualité et concret.  

Welcome to the LIVEforward Institute Living Room Conversations!We have seen the catalytic power of conversations in the work that we do, as well as the impact that it brings to our world.Our Living Room is a space for us to connect, to explore thoughts and learnings, in a relaxed and very human way. Through this channel, we look forward to an engaging dialogue and resonance with our guests, and bring a breath of fresh air to the space we occupy in this virtual world.To our listeners and followers, we hope to create an opportunity to candidly eavesdrop and chime in to one of the many interesting conversations around the space of teal, agile and the future of work.Our guest, Peter Koenig, founder and creator of peterkoenigsystem®, a body of work described as "moneywork" and "sourcework", a system for accelerating the realization of life and work goals.The business community has started to embrace “Purpose” and Transformation” processes, “Climate Change” is now more recently on the agenda amongst the leaders. But good visions and moral imperatives are alone insufficient to generate aspired changes in old, inherited institutional patterns. What makes the difference between truly “Walking the Talk” and just talking? Peter Koenig has pioneered and refined advanced tools for what he calls “transforlution” for over 35 years – transformation and perpetual evolution towards solutions in accordance with nature. A generative consciousness related to money lies at the core of this – and love.Stay tuned for our next Living Room Conversations.

How do we realise worthwhile ideas in the world? Define a goal, create a plan, build a great team? That's how we're told to do it. How about instead, we listen to what we're really called to do? Tom Nixon is an entrepreneur, founder of org-chart startup https://www.maptio.com/ (Maptio), and the author of the book https://tomnixon.gumroad.com/l/Piwhd (Work with Source), which introduces a new perspective on being a founder, based on research conducted by https://peterkoenig.typepad.com/ (Peter Koenig). Chatting with Laurence and Carlos, he discusses how finding and cultivating sources of creativity leads to greater autonomy and happiness, and the balance that needs to be struck between giving people creative freedom, and not sufficiently defining roles. Go furhterhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gail_Bradbrook (Gail Bradbrook, founder of Extinction Rebellion) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yvon_Chouinard (Yvon Chouinard, founder of Patagonia) https://www.ft.com/content/aee67fe0-ac63-11e9-b3e2-4fdf846f48f5 (WL Gore: the company others try and fail to imitate) https://www.linkedin.com/in/fannynorlin/?originalSubdomain=se (Fanny Norlin) https://www.amazon.co.uk/Rocket-Fuel-Essential-Combination-Business/dp/1942952317/ref=asc_df_1942952317/?tag=googshopuk-21&linkCode=df0&hvadid=310762413837&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=13168497648528775572&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9046761&hvtargid=pla-436431091103&psc=1&th=1&psc=1 (Rocket Fuel: The One Essential Combination That Will Get You More of What You Want from Your Business), by Gino Wickman

Article by Peter Koenig…. The Spike Protein is the Killer, Beware of mRNA Vaccines. Magnetofection: Aggressive Magnetic Gel Delivery System….. YES, a magnet will stick to a Pfizer, or Moderna injection site, (after the inoculation), but not lasting. Finding a vaccine exemption prior to returning to school, (policy: gray area written just for you).

It is Time to Dismantle the World Health Organization Richard Gale & Gary Null PhD Progressive Radio Network, April 19, 2021   The ultimate international authority for infectious diseases is the World Health Organization (WHO). Due to its widespread acceptance by the world's national governments, it has been extremely successful in assuming the helm to monitor regional and global infectious diseases and dictate medical intervention policies to international health agencies. The organization has become the final word to rule whether the spread of a serious pathogen is a pandemic or not. For the majority of the medical community, the media and the average person, the WHO is the front line command post for medical prevention (i.e., vaccination) and treatment.  Consequently its rulings are often regarded as the gold standard.  On matters of global health, the WHO holds dominance.  For approximately a year the WHO has propagated the belief that the first line of defense for curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic is self-isolation, distancing, masks and, ultimately, vaccination. Although it approved Ivermectin as a cost-effective treatment against SARS-CoV-2 infections, it disapproved hydroxychloroquine in favor of Gilead Bioscience’s and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease’s (NIAID) Anthony Fauci’s novel and costly drug Remdesivir.  Much of it’s funding efforts have been reserved for mass-vaccination with the new generation of experimental vaccines. Throughout these efforts, the WHO has allied itself with the US's and UK’s national health systems, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and his Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) initiative.  Most people wrongly assume the WHO acts independently from private commercial and national government interests for the welfare of the world's population. The legitimacy of the WHO as a gold standard of health is dubious. The organization has frequently been accused of conflicts of interests with private pharmaceutical companies and mega-philanthropic organizations such as the Gates’ Foundation, as well as being riddled with political alliances, ideologies, and profiteering motives. Despite it’s mega-pharmaceutical interests and consultants representing private vaccine interests, in the past the WHO has had the audacity to ridicule the pharmaceutical industry of corruption. “Corruption in the pharmaceutical sector occurs throughout all stages of the medicine chain, from research and development to dispensing and promotion…. A lack of transparency and accountability within the medicines chain can also contribute to unethical practices and corruption.” These are similar charges that have been leveled against the WHO. An article in the National Review called the WHO "scandal plagued" with "wasteful spending, utter disregard for transparency, pervasive incompetence, and failure to adhere to even basic democratic standards." In his book, Immunization: How Vaccines Became Controversial, University of Amsterdam professor emeritus Dr. Stuart Blume raises the serious problem of the WHO’s most influential advisors on emergency health conditions, such as the current Covid-19 pandemic and earlier the 2009 H1N1 swine flu scare that never was, serve as consultants for the vaccine industry. During times of global emergencies and crises, the WHO confers with a separate group of advisors outside its formal sitting Strategic Advisory Group of Experts or SAGE; the names of this group’s members are not made public.  We would add that the WHO’s level of incompetence has resulted in serious misinformation about pandemics, medical risks of vaccines and other health-threatening chemicals.  For example, during the early stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, the organization reported it could not find any evidence of human transmission. However, the WHO has repeatedly kowtowed to China’s demands and unscrupulously accepts whatever statistics and statements the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) provides. Responding to a petition signed by over 700,000 signatories demanding the resignation of the current WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom, Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso told the Japanese parliament that the organization “should be renamed the Chinese Health Organization” for favoring China’s policy to stall and obstruct international investigations and for lauding unsubstantiated praise on the country’s transparency and handling of the pandemic. Back on December 31, 2019, Taiwan – which has been barred from WHO membership due to China’s political maneuvering – had been warning of a possible human-to-human transmission contrary to the wet-market narrative, but this was largely ignored in order to avoid upsetting the CCP. The UK’s Sunday Times reported that Chinese scientists were forced to destroy their proof of the virus shortly after its discovery. In the province of Hubei, authorities ordered the cessation of further testing and the destruction of existing samples. Other researchers who made efforts to warn the public were punished.  Writing for The Hill, University of Texas at San Antonio professor Bradley Thayer wrote, “Tedros apparently turned a blind eye to what happened in Wuhan and the rest of China and… has helped play down the severity, prevalence and scope of the Covid-19 outbreak.” Thayer concludes, “Tedros is not fit to lead the WHO.” He has no formal medical training as a physician or any international management experience in global health. Many others have voiced similar criticisms pointing out Tedro’s unsuitable background.  Moreover, the Director General’s conflicts of interest with China abound. Immediately before and after his tenure as the Health Minister for Ethiopia’s ruling Communist party, the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, China had donated an estimated $60 million to the terrorist government and its social programs. Now heading the WHO, Tedros appears to continue lobbying on China’s behalf. In 2017, the Washington Post noted the fundamental problem:  “[China] worked tirelessly behind the scenes to help Tedros defeat the United Kingdom candidate for the WHO job, David Nabarro. Tedros’s victory was also a victory for Beijing, whose leader Xi Jinping has made public his goal of flexing China’s muscle in the world.” Upon assuming his new position at the WHO, Tedros had left Ethiopia’s healthcare system in ruin.  As one young healthcare worker reported, there was no “bare necessities of a health care office…. Sterile gloves, paper exam gowns and covers, cotton swabs, gauze, tongue depressors, alcohol prep pads, chemical test strips, suturing equipment, syringes, stethoscopes… were non-existent. This is a fact in most health care centers in Ethiopia.”  During the more recent re-investigation of SARS-CoV-2 origins, the Chinese authorities refused to provide raw case data and created repressive conditions to curtail reliable analysis and disclosure. The WHO’s final report concluded that the virus had an animal origin and did not escape Wuhan’s high security pathogen laboratory. But there are viable reasons to discredit the report as untrustworthy at best and perhaps intentionally deceptive.  First, the entire agenda of the investigation was staged theater rather than a deep investigation to uncover empirical evidence. The team simply inspected seafood and open-air markets. Consequently, the WHO team returned empty handed and without laboratory records for a proper forensic examination. To call the entire WHO effort gross incompetence would be an understatement. Based upon all the evidence that has emerged, a large number of professional medical voices are calling the entire investigation a farce. Most problematic is the appointment of Peter Daszak on the WHO’s group to carry out the investigation. Daszak, the founding president of the shadowy non-profit organization EcoHealth Alliance, has headed many hunting adventures worldwide to identify the emergence of potential pathogens that could become pandemics. With the intention to divert attention away from an escaped laboratory virus, Daszak stated on a Going Viral podcast there was no evidential reason to visit and inspect the Wuhan laboratory. According to Independent Science News, despite Daszak’s denial of a lab origin, “EcoHealth Alliance funded bat coronavirus research, including virus collection, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and thus could themselves be directly implicated in the outbreak.” The research at the Wuhan lab included ‘gain of function” efforts on coronaviruses, and received funds directly approved by Anthony Fauci. Newsweek reports the NIH had given a total of $7.4 million to the Chinese lab for the research. The organization has received over $100 million from a variety of sources, including the Department of Defense, Homeland Security, the NIH and undisclosed amounts from the Chinese government. Daszak himself has authored 25 studies funded by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, think tanks, universities, military institutions, and ministries directly connected with the Chinese Communist Party.  Given the halls of power within the WHO, we are outlining some of the more salient reasons why the organization's declarations about infectious diseases, pandemics and vaccination should not be trusted.  Vaccine Promotional Misconduct For many years the WHO's recommendations for certain vaccines were kept secret. Writing in a 2006 issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Dr. Marc Girard uncovered "scientific incompetence, misconduct or even criminal malfeasance" over the intentional inflation of vaccines' benefits while undermining toxicity and adverse effects. Dr. Girard testified as a medical expert for a French court in a criminal trial against the WHO after French health officials obliged the organization to launch its universal Hepatitis B vaccine campaign. The campaign resulted in the deaths of French children. Girard gained access to confidential WHO documents. He noted that the WHO's "French figures about chronic liver diseases were simply extrapolated from the U.S. reports." He further accused the WHO serving "merely as a screen for commercial promotion, in particular via the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board (VHPB), which was created, sponsored, and infiltrated by the manufacturers." Now during the Covid-19 pandemic, as early as last July, the WHO approved of China’s first vaccine for emergency use, long before it had undergone proper clinical trials and much earlier than Moderna’s and Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines’ approval. Orchestration of Pandemic Panics Before the current COVID-19 pandemic, there was the H1N1 swine flu scare in 2009. However, at the very start the WHO's fear mongering of a global contagion that could exceed the death counts of the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic was solely based on false rhetoric rather than empirical evidence.  The fabrications are believed to have originated from the WHO's senior consultant on viral outbreaks who happens to carry the reputation of being one of the world's leading pandemic alarmists: Dr. Albert Osterhaus, nicknamed "Dr. Flu." At the time, Osterhaus was head of the Department of Virology at Erasmus University in the Netherlands. When the swine flu scare appeared, he was also the president of the European Scientific Working Group on Influenza (ESWI), an organization funded by the major vaccine manufacturers including Baxter, MedImmune, Glaxo, Sanofi Pasteur and others. It was also Osterhaus who transformed an otherwise potentially bad flu season into a global pandemic. The WHO has been criticized harshly in the media for changing the definition of a "pandemic" and in doing so has been charged with benefitting the pharmaceutical industry. The British Medical Journal reported that the WHO failed to report conflicts of interest in its H1N1 advisory group. The journal's Editor-in-Chief Fiona Godlee wrote, "WHO must act now to restore its credibility, and Europe should legislate." The former head of the prestigious Cochrane Database Collaboration’s vaccine studies, Dr. Tom Jefferson, told a Der Spiegel interviewer, “the WHO and public health officials, virologists and the pharmaceutical companies... built this machine around the impending [H1N1] pandemic. And there’s a lot of money involved, and influence and careers, and entire institutions.” When the 2009 H1N1 influenza strain appeared, the WHO rushed forward to mangle its earlier criteria that would realistically define a pandemic. The organization intentionally removed reference to a pathogen’s “severity” as a necessary requirement. “Don’t you think there’s something noteworthy,” Dr. Jefferson continues, “about the fact that the WHO has changed its definition of a pandemic?.... that’s how swine flu has been categorized as a pandemic.” Moreover, the WHO’s decision to label the outbreak as a pandemic was not based upon its own permanent vaccine experts but on the recommendations of a non-disclosed group of outside consultants.  According to a financial forecast published by JP Morgan, the collaboration between the WHO and Osterhaus's ESWI to orchestrate the pandemic would have profited the pharmaceutical industry up to $10 billion. Der Spiegel reported: “The WHO and those in charge of public health, the virologists and the pharmaceutical laboratories....  created a whole system around the imminence of a pandemic. There is a lot of money at stake, as well as networks of influence, careers and whole institutions! And the minute one of the flu viruses mutates we’d see the whole machine roll into action.” In 2010, the EU’s Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe launched an investigation into the evidence that the WHO had created “a fake pandemic” in order to financially benefit the pharmaceutical giants’ vaccine market and to strengthen the influence private drug interests have over the health organization. The Assembly’s chairperson Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg charged the WHO’s fake pandemic as “one of the greatest medical scandals of the century that resulted in “millions being needlessly vaccinated.” Epidemic of Conflict of Interests According to former World Bank geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig, about half of the WHO's budget is derived from private sources -- primarily pharmaceutical companies but also other corporate sectors including the telecommunication and agro-chemical industries. It also receives large donations from large philanthropic organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI. Eleven years ago, Gates had committed $10 billion to the WHO; after the US, his Foundation is its second largest donor providing 10 percent of its funding.  His financial commitment aligned with his global ambition to “make this the decade of vaccines.” Koenig also believes that Tedros’s appointment was due to Gates' influence. This may carry some truth because Tedros is a former Chair of GAVI’s Vaccine Alliance. Barbara Loe Fisher at the National Vaccine Information Center estimates that "only about 10 percent of total funding provided by GAVI ($862M) was used to strengthen health systems in developing countries, such as improving sanitation and nutrition, while nearly 80 percent was used to purchase, deliver and promote vaccines."  There is also the deep personal and financial relationship between Gates and the Chinese Communist government that demands further investigation. Gates is a member of the Chinese Academy of Science. For the moment, the WHO has been advising against Covid-19 vaccine passports as a mandate to travel. Nevertheless, China has already launched encrypted digital certificates as proof of vaccination. Given Gates’ close relationship with Chinese officials, perhaps he is awaiting on China to establish a precedent for other nations to agree on a global mandate that will eventually be propagated by the Gate’s network and the World Economic Forum and its Great Reset.  During a 2020 TED talk, Gates had already revealed that digital vaccine passports may be necessary; that part of his speech was edited from the original video, however, Robert Kennedy Jr. tracked down the original footage.  Gates has also 1) commissioned MIT to develop injectable a quantum dot dye system for children, 2) funded MicroChips, a company developing implantable chip-based devices, and 3) purchased 3.7 million shares in Serco who is developing tracing technology to track pandemic infections and vaccine compliance. Finally, Gates shares the Chinese Communist Party’s interests in collecting and ‘mining” citizens’ DNA. A 60 Minutes expose presented the covert activities of BGI Genomics, a CCP-linked firm that has exported Covid-19 tests to “collect, store and exploit biometric information” on American citizens. Independent investigations reveal that the Gates Foundation has collaborated with BGI and it was through Gates’ influence over Obama that the Chinese company entered the US market.  BGI’s RT-PCR kit was promoted by the WHO back in May 2020 for first line emergency diagnostic use. The rationale was that the test was highly sensitive, specific and user-friendly. Subsequently the EU, FDA, and the Australian, Canadian and Japanese health ministries rapidly purchased and deployed it. On its website, the Gates Foundation acknowledges its role in having the PCR tests supplied to the WHO. “Nine Chinese PCR tests were approved by WHO during 2020 under its Emergency Use Listing (EUL) mechanism, with one of the foundation’s partners supplying tests to WHO” Three months later, Sweden filed complaints after reports of a high percentage of false positives from the Chinese tests.  There is in our opinion little doubt that the WHO is another one of Gates' bought off entities for furthering his personal agenda to promote vaccines, genetically modified seeds and chemical agriculture in the developing world.  Vaccine Adverse Effects Monitoring System Needs Overhaul The WHO's Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety is the group responsible for administering vaccine programs in poorer, developing countries. It is also responsible for gathering data on incidents of vaccine injuries. Any deaths following vaccination campaigns are ignored and ruled as coincidental. This policy is based on the erroneous assumption that if no one died during a vaccine's clinical trials, then the vaccine should be regarded as automatically safe and unrelated to any deaths that might occur later. Consequently, the WHO's monitoring system is seriously flawed and requires a major overhaul.  One of the more controversial incidences was the WHO's collaboration with the Bill Gates’ GAVI campaign to launch the Pentavalent vaccine (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, HIP and Hepatitis B) in Africa and later in South and Southeast Asia. In India, health officials recorded upwards to 8,190 additional infant deaths annually following Pentavalent campaign.  The WHO’s response was to reclassify its adverse event reporting system to disregard "infant" deaths altogether. Dr. Jacob Puliyel, a member of the Indian government's National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization concluded,  “deaths and other serious adverse events following vaccination in the third world, that use WHO-AEFI classification are not recorded in any database for pharmaco-vigilance. It is as if the deaths of children in low (and middle) income countries are of no consequence.” WHO's Double Standards of Vaccine Safety A more recent scandal erupted during the WHO's Global Vaccine Safety Summit convened in December 2019.  Days before the summit, one of the WHO's medical directors for vaccination, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, appeared in a public advertisement touting the unquestionable safety of vaccines and ridiculing parents who speak out against vaccination. She assured viewers that the WHO was in control of matters and monitored any potential adverse risks carefully. However, during the Summit, the same Dr. Swaminathan acknowledged vaccine health risks and stated, "We really don't have very good safety monitoring systems." Another Summit participant, Dr. Heidi Larson stated, "We have a very wobbly ‘health professional frontline’ that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. When the frontline professionals are starting to question or they don’t feel like they have enough confidence about the safety to stand up to the person asking the questions. I mean most medical school curriculums, even nursing curriculums, I mean in medical school you are lucky if you have half a day on vaccines.” And more noteworthy were the statements by Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator of the WHO's Initiative for Vaccine Research,  "... I give courses every year on how do you develop vaccines, how do you make vaccines. And the first lesson is while you’re making your vaccine if you can avoid using an adjuvant please do so. Lesson two is if you’re going to use an adjuvant use one that has a history of safety. And lesson three is if you’re not going to do that, think very carefully." In other words, what the WHO presents to the public contradicts what is discussed behind closed doors, another example of the veil of secrecy the organization operates within.  Now we are witnessing more countries halting further administration of AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine, a vaccine Trump had committed $1.2 billion towards its development. Subsequently the CDC paused Johnson & Johnson’s similar engineered adenovirus vaccine in order to investigate its association with an otherwise rare condition of fatal blood clotting. The WHO on the other hand has ignored these nations’ ethical responsibility to adhere to the precautionary principle. Its own review claimed there were no blood clot links to AstraZeneca’s vaccine; later the WHO changed its tune to “plausible” after EU regulators found a causal link and the New England Journal of Medicine published two studies providing specific details confirming these adverse reactions.  Although acknowledging these risks, the WHO has continued to recommend that mass vaccination proceed as if there were no red alarms.   WHO's Depopulation Efforts with Vaccines Without doubt, the most nefarious activity conducted by the WHO is its alleged support and distribution of vaccines to poorer developing countries that may have been intentionally designed to decrease population rates.  Back in 1989, the WHO sponsored a symposium at its Geneva headquarters on "Antifertility Vaccines and Contraceptive Vaccines." The symposium presented proposals for vaccines that were later discovered to have been laced with the sterilizing hormones HCG and estradiol; the former prevents pregnancy and triggers spontaneous abortions and miscarriages, and the latter can turn men infertile.   In 2015, the Kenyan Conference of Catholic Bishops reported its discovery of a polio vaccine laced with estradiol that was manufactured in India and distributed by the WHO. A year earlier, Dr. Wahome Ngare from the Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association uncovered a tetanus vaccine specifically being administered to women, also distributed by the WHO, that contained the HCG hormone. All of the polio vaccine samples tested contained HCG, estrogen-related compounds, follicle stimulating and luteinizing hormones, which will damage sperm formation in the testes. Even more disturbing, this vaccine was going to be administered to children under five years of age.  However, this is not the first time the WHO appears to have made efforts to use vaccination campaigns for depopulation.  A decade earlier, in 2004, the WHO, UNICIF and CDC launched a vaccination campaign to immunize 74 million African children during a polio outbreak. The initiative encountered a serious obstacle. In Nigeria, laboratory tests on the WHO's vaccine samples resulted in the presence of estrogen and other female hormones. And in the mid-1990s, a tetanus vaccine being administered to Nicaraguan and Filipino girls and women in their child-bearing years was discovered to contain HCG, which accounted for a large number of spontaneous abortions that were reported by Catholic health workers.  Illegal Vaccine Experiments In 2014, The Economic Times of India published a report that provided details of a joint venture between the WHO and the Gates Foundation to test an experimental HPV vaccine on approximately 16,000 tribal girls between the ages of 9 and 15 unwittingly. The experiment was conducted in 2008, and the vaccine is now what we commonly know as Gardasil. Many of the girls, the report states, became ill and some died.  The following year the WHO and Gates Foundation conducted a similar experiment on 14,000 girls with the HPV vaccine Cervarix. Again "scores of teenage girls were hospitalized."  Investigations led by Indian health officials uncovered gross violations in India's laws regarding medical safety. In numerous cases there was no consent and the children had no idea what they were being vaccinated for. The Indian Supreme Court has taken up a case against the duo for criminal charges.  There are many other questionable activities that the WHO has been involved with over the years. However, the above provide sufficient evidence to argue the case that, at least within the upper echelons of the WHO, global health does not stand in high priority.  The organization employs over 7,000 people around the world and most of these have deep concern for improving the lives of populations in poor and developing nations. On the other hand, the WHO's leaders are there largely because the powers of Washington, London and the pharmaceutical industry benefit by the organization advancing its agendas.  Of course, the WHO is not the only health entity with a legacy of corruption.  Corruption appears to be systemic throughout global health and national health agencies.  This topic was featured last year in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet. Author Dr. Patricia Garcia writes,  "Corruption is embedded in health systems. Throughout my life—as a researcher, public health worker, and a Minister of Health—I have been able to see entrenched dishonesty and fraud. But despite being one of the most important barriers to implementing universal health coverage around the world, corruption is rarely openly discussed." Bear in mind, the WHO, along with Bill Gates and his Foundation, and Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Disease, are leading the efforts to get the COVID-19 vaccine administered as quickly as possible. Already the Gates Foundation has given $1.75 billion for developing and distributing these vaccines. Do you believe we can trust their judgment and the intense public relations effort that will immediately follow after such a vaccine reaches the market? 

Corporate ReGeneration a pour ambition de mobiliser l’ingéniosité des jeunes générations et des entreprises pour créer les solutions d’un avenir durable et régénératif . De manière plus vaste, le projet répond à l’urgence de muter vers un modèle de société plus en phase avec le respect du vivant. Une aventure joyeuse qui pourrait bien transformer la manière d’entreprendre ! Vincent Truyens et Olivier Bouche initiateurs du projet, sont nos invités, ainsi que Louis Martin qui travaille sur le projet du congrès international Money&Business partnership de Peter Koenig et Coraline Dupelou qui travaille sur le projet du green digital pour Altavia Act.

Corporate ReGeneration a pour ambition de mobiliser l’ingéniosité des jeunes générations et des entreprises pour créer les solutions d’un avenir durable et régénératif . De manière plus vaste, le projet répond à l’urgence de muter vers un modèle de société plus en phase avec le respect du vivant. Une aventure joyeuse qui pourrait bien transformer la manière d’entreprendre ! Vincent Truyens et Olivier Bouche initiateurs du projet, sont nos invités, ainsi que Louis Martin qui travaille sur le projet du congrès international Money&Business partnership de Peter Koenig et Coraline Dupelou qui travaille sur le projet du green digital pour Altavia Act.

Yuji Yamada is the founder of EnFlow and is interested in exploring the differences between approaching organisational transformation from a ‘Western lens’ and a Japanese lens. We talk about teal organisations from Frederic Laloux’s book ‘Reinventing Organisations’ (which has sold 100,000 copies in Japan) and Yuji’s homegrown concept of ‘Jinen management’. Could East Asian organisations be at an advantage in developing new ways of working by drawing on their ancient wisdom and inherent cultural paradigms of interconnectedness?  How to follow Yuji: Twitter: @yujiyamada0522 Resources: Yuji’s Medium post, ‘The trends of Teal organization in Japan’ The book ‘The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently’ by Richard E. Nisbett Related Leadermorphosis episodes: Ep. 55 with Frederic Laloux, author of Reinventing Organisations Ep. 5 with Tom Nixon, founder of Maptio Ep. 49 with Peter Koenig about sourcework

A sudden cough attack somewhat surprisingly leads right into the heart of Peter Koenig’s life work about understanding the mental construct, or should we say the mental blockage, that we call money. What is money? If you ask people, the answer can be anything under the sun: security, peace, happiness, love, a prison, insecurity, war and loss of power. If money can be perceived as all of those things, what is it really? the Zurich based British businessman Koenig asked himself forty years ago. The answer was that it’s not something in the bank. It’s something in our heads. ”The key, the epiphany, was to see that it works through the process we call projection.” Since money is considered retainable and countable, it appears that also the attributes are retainable and countable. ”If you think you need money to exist you've exteriorized your feeling of security and projected it on money. You’re on the hamster wheel. First you aim for one million, but that won’t do it, so it’s ten. And when you reach 9,9 it’s suddenly twenty. You’ve disconnected from your inner security.” Koenig’s proposed remedy is simple affirmation therapy. In this episode you will hear me first affirm that I exist either with or without money and then that I actually don’t exist and that it’s cool... ”You will free yourself from the fear of loss and insecurity, and you will dare to spend your money, and you will spend it on things you love.” Businessmen are by no means free from the projection. ”They are supposed to be the most powerful people in the world, but in my consulting work I saw the other side. They had all these visions, but very few of them were able to realize them. They were not actually manifesting what was deepest in their hearts.” When the businessmen focused on their dreams there was a wonderful atmosphere, but then somebody said ”we must make a budget for this amazing idea”, and the atmosphere went out the window. And the future? Yes, Peter Koenig has an idea of a new money system, a non-centrally created system with wisdom in it. He thinks the industrial system reached its peak 40-50 years ago and has since then gone on automatically. But about now, he says, we are at a transitional point. ”The industrial system was brilliant, but it's very intellectual and mind-centered. Its limitations will entail difficulties if we don't step out of it. And we are stepping out.” Here’s Peter’s blog. Here’s a link to the upcoming congress about creating love in business.

Aujourd'hui, dans cet épisode de Wake Up, Rise Up & Shine, j'ai l'immense plaisir de recevoir Christian Junod. Christian  est un des rares experts sur le thème encore tabou qu'est la relation à l'argent. Économiste de formation, banquier durant 23 ans, il s'est ensuite reconverti et sa passion aujourd'hui est  d'accompagner les particuliers et les professionnels  a réajuster leur relation à l'argent afin qu'il soit au service des projets de Vie de chacun. Christian est Coach certifié , certifié à l'Élément Humain, formé à la Communication Non Violente (CNV) et aux approches systémiques. Il a été très influencé par sa rencontre avec Peter Koenig. Ce chercheur, en avance sur son temps, lui a transmis son savoir sur la relation à l'argent et les Principes Source.Il est l'auteur de  Ce que l'argent dit de vous et co-auteur de Enfin libre d'être soi-même avec Evelyne Faniel et de Le défi des 100 jours : pour libérer son rapport à l'argent vivre son abondance  avec Lilou Macé.Cet épisode est pour vous si :Vous sentez que vous avez une relation compliquée avec l'argentVous aimeriez en avoir plus mais vous jugez ceux qui en ontVous aimeriez avoir tout l'argent dont vous avez besoin mais en même temps vous avez du mal à croire que ce soit réellement possibleVous êtes curieux de mieux comprendre ce qui se cache derrière notre rapport à l'argentDans cet épisode nous abordons les points suivants :Avons-nous tous une relation à l'argent et ça parle de quoi ?Quel est le grand piège avec l'argent ? Comment se construit notre relation à l'argent ?Y a-t-il une limite à combien on peut gagner ?A quoi peut ressembler une relation à l'argent « saine » ?En savoir plus sur Christian Junod.Découvrir la retraite de développement personnel Rise UP de Christine Lewicki - une retraite pour changer radicalement votre relation à la réussite et à l'argent et vous donner l'audace de pleinement vivre la vie que vous avez choisie.Comment soutenir ce podcast ?Le meilleur moyen de le faire est de vous abonner au podcast Wake Up, Rise Up & Shine! sur Apple Podcast, et d'y laisser votre avis en lui donnant 5 étoiles ! *Vous le trouverez également sur toutes vos autres plateformes d'écoute préférées :  Spotify / Google Podcast / Podcast Addict / Podchaser / Deezer et Listen Notes.Et bien sûr, n'hésitez pas à faire connaître Wake Up, Rise Up & Shine! en le partageant à toutes les personnes qui vous sont chères et qui aspirent elles aussi à briller et ne plus vivre leur vie à moitié endormi !Aller plus loin ensemble ?Abonnez-vous à ma newsletter pour être informé.e dès la publication d'un nouvel épisode et recevez en cadeau mon programme vidéo gratuit sur 5 jours pour ne plus vivre votre vie à moitié endormi : https://www.christinelewicki.com/programme-video-offert/

This week, on the Global Research News Hour, we question three experts about the uunspecified risks associated with the COVID vaccine. We also dig into a more elaborate risk to human freedom posed by an ID Nanochip with ecomonist and geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig.

Join Peter Koenig and I to discover how you can reclaim your relationship to money. Peter invented the term reclamation work to refer to the process of reclaiming whatever we have suppressed, which stops us form creating the Masterpiece we were born to create. He has lived a life he loves for over 30 years, during which time he has become arguably the world’s leading expert on our relationship to money. He was a pioneer in the Purpose and Open Space movement in the 1980s. I caught up with him next to Lake Geneva on a beautiful summer’s day. Enjoy our wide-ranging conversation. It may just change your world for good. Wherever you are happy creating! The next #Masterpiece program starts on 15 December 2020 in Asia and 12 January 2021 in Europe and North America. Find out more.

Peter Koenig has researched money for decades and his insights will surprise you. His projection and reclamation work has had a profound impact on coaches and mentors around the world. His "money work" has supported thousands to make peace with their relationships with money.

NOW IN 22 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES. CLICK ON THE LOWER LEFT HAND CORNER “TRANSLATE” TAB TO FIND YOURS! By Jeff J. Brown Pictured above: left, guest Peter Koenig, who is back home in Switzerland and on the right, yours truly, on the D-Day beaches of Normandy, France. Our interview is definitely a current event spanning talk...

Scott Flanders (aka Shapecarver) joins us as the first guest of the Draftsmen Podcast! He shares his good and bad experiences working in the gaming art industry, the dark side of working in a corporate environment, the challenges he’s faced to make it as an artist and family man, and how he’s been able to become an independent artist and entrepreneur doing what he truly loves. Scott’s Website - https://www.tarpitstudios.com/ Call and Ask Your Art Questions: 1-858-609-9453 Show Links (some contain affiliate links): Digital Shape Carving with Scott Flanders - https://youtu.be/-i-EgBilwks Actually Carving Shapes with Scott Flanders - https://youtu.be/asZTfoVAc-Q Rag Painting with Scott Flanders - https://youtu.be/5gVj3h_9yZc Reacting to YOUR Monster Art on Instagram (Prokochallenge) - https://youtu.be/_jzcagO02aA Character Design Workflow - Concepting for 3D Games and Movies - https://youtu.be/J8g3JKobvnk Evolve - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/evolve-digital-art-and-sculpture-concepts-s2e13.jpg Legends of Runeterra - https://playruneterra.com/en-us/ Tar Pit Studios - https://www.tarpitstudios.com/ Scott’s Patreon - https://patreon.com/shapecarver Tar Pit Wars kitbashing - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/tar-pit-wars-kitbashing-team-s2e13.jpg Guy Davis and The Marquis: Inferno - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/guy-davis-artwork-and-comic-s2e13.jpg Peter Koenig - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/peter-koenig-movie-sculptures-s2e13.jpg Stephen Oakley - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/stephen-oakley-artwork-s2e13.jpg Kurt Papstein - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/kurt-papstein-artwork-s2e13.jpg Majid Smiley - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/majid-smiley-esmaeili-wolverine-s2e13.jpg Simon Lee - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/simon-lee-spiderzero-s2e13.jpg Knight Zhang - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/knight-zhang-digital-art-S2e13.jpg Joe Rogan, Brendan Schaub - https://youtu.be/01Uj1eNnZ8o King’s Beach - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/kings-beach-art-promo-s2e13.jpg La Brea Tar Pits - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/la-brea-tar-pits-s2e13.jpg Pixologic 3D print - https://proko.com/draftsmen-media/pixologic-3d-printed-sculpture-s2e13.jpg Learn to Draw - www.proko.com Marshall Vandruff - www.marshallart.com Stan Prokopenko - instagram.com/stanprokopenko Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Daniel Maloney, Deputy CSO, Verizon and Peter Koenig, Training and Development Specialist will share their personal journey including what worked for them as they transitioned to a CyberSecurity career. This talk is for you if you are in the military, law enforcement or any other public service career and are planning the next steps in your career. When is the best time to start your preparation for a cyber security career. How to decide which cybersecurity domain to focus on. What certifications are required for a cybersecurity career? How long does it take to upskill and retrain? They will provide tips, training, and certifications that you can incorporate in your life which will help your cybersecurity career. #payitforward #careerjourney #careerchange #cissp #ceh #cybersecurity #security #infosecurity #cyberforensics #incidentresponse #cyberinvestigation #computerforensics #threatanalysis #hacker We will discuss, what works for these experts, what they have seen has worked for friends and how you can plan a successful cyber security investigation career. #ciso Join https://www.meetup.com/cybersecurity-careers/Subscribe to Cybersecurity Career Talks on Soundwise

NOW IN 22 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES. CLICK ON THE LOWER LEFT HAND CORNER “TRANSLATE” TAB TO FIND YOURS! By Jeff J. Brown Pictured above: left to right, Kevin Barrett of “Truth Jihad Radio” hosts Peter Koenig and Jeff J. Brown on his show. Become a regular China Rising Radio Sinoland patron and get FREE BOOKS! Support...

Why the World Health Organization Deserves Our Distrust Richard Gale & Gary Null PhD Progressive Radio Network, May 8, 2020   Many more questions are being raised than there are answers being discovered concerning the recent strains of coronavirus. Where and how did it originate? Was it the result of human engineering and manipulation or is it a strain that mutated naturally?  What are the best tests to determine exposure and infection? Why are so many infected individuals asymptomatic? Are all elderly people equally susceptible to infection and how much do co-morbidities determine outcomes? These are just several of the important questions that still require definitive answers. The ultimate international authority for infectious diseases is the World Health Organization (WHO). Because of its acceptance by the world's national governments, it has been extremely successful in its mission. The WHO is the final word in determining whether the spread of a serious pathogen is ruled as a pandemic or not. For the majority of the medical community, the media and the average person, the WHO is the front line command post for medical prevention (i.e., vaccination) and treatment.  Consequently it's rulings are often regarded as the gold standard by which many nations design their health policies and intervening protocols to protect their citizens.  On matters of global health, the WHO holds dominance. We are currently being told by the Director General of the WHO that the solutions for curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic are self-isolation, distancing, masks, and, for those in acute stages of infection, ventilation. To date there is no drug that has been found to be universally safe and effective. Therefore, all efforts, with massive funding, are being devoted to rapidly get a coronavirus vaccine on the market.  And in this effort, the WHO is a close ally and advocate in the US's federal health system, notably the CDC and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci. Most people assume the WHO acts independently from private commercial and national government interests for the welfare of the world's population. However, at best this is an assumption. Moreover, the very legitimacy of the WHO as a gold standard of health is questionable. The organization has been accused of conflicts of interests with private pharmaceutical companies and mega-philanthropic organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as being riddled with political alliances, ideologies, and profiteering motives.  An article in the National Review called the WHO "scandal plagued" with "wasteful spending, utter disregard for transparency, pervasive incompetence, and failure to adhere to even basic democratic standards." We would also add that its level of incompetence has resulted in serious misinformation about the medical risks of vaccines and other health-threatening chemicals.  For example, during the early stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, the organization reported it could not find any evidence of human transmission. Now we know it is perhaps the most transmittable respiratory viral infection encountered in modern medical history. Given the halls of power within the WHO, we are outlining some of the more salient reasons why the organization's declarations about infectious diseases, pandemics and vaccination should not entirely be trusted. Vaccine Promotional Misconduct Very few will know that for a long time, the WHO's recommendations for certain vaccines were kept secret. Writing in a 2006 issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Dr. Marc Girard uncovered "scientific incompetence, misconduct or even criminal malfeasance" over the intentional inflation of vaccines' benefits while undermining toxicity and adverse effects. Dr. Girard was called upon as a medical expert by the French courts in a criminal trial against the WHO after French health officials obliged the organization to launch its universal Hepatitis B vaccine campaign. The campaign resulted in the deaths of French children.  Consequently, Girard gained access to confidential WHO documents. He notes that the WHO's "French figures about chronic liver diseases were simply extrapolated from the U.S. reports." He further accused the WHO serving "merely as a screen for commercial promotion, in particular via the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board (VHPB), which was created, sponsored, and infiltrated by the manufacturers." Orchestration of Pandemic Panics Before the current COVID-19 pandemic, there was the H1N1 swine flu scare in 2009 that came and went as a church mouse. However, at the very start the WHO's fear mongering of a global contagion that could exceed the death counts of the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic was based on false assumptions.  The fabrications are believed to have originated from the WHO's senior consultant on viral outbreaks who happens to be one of the world's leading pandemic alarmists: Dr. Albert Osterhaus who carries the nickname "Dr. Flu." Osterhaus is head of the Department of Virology at Erasmus University in the Netherlands. At the time of the H1N1 pandemic, he was the president of the European Scientific Working Group on Influenza (ESWI), an organization funded by the major vaccine manufacturers including Baxter, MedImmune, Glaxo, Sanofi Pasteur and others. It is ESWI's agenda to vaccinate the entire world against the swine flu. It was also Osterhaus who transformed an otherwise potentially bad flu season into a global pandemic. The WHO has been criticized harshly in the media for changing the definition of a "pandemic" and in doing so has been charged with benefitting the pharmaceutical industry. Moreover, the British Medical Journal reported that the WHO failed to report conflicts of interest in its H1N1 advisory group. The journal's Editor-in-Chief Fiona Godlee wrote, "WHO must act now to restore its credibility, and Europe should legislate." According to a financial forecast published by JP Morgan, the collaboration between the WHO and Osterhaus's ESWI to orchestrate the pandemic would have profited the pharmaceutical industry up to $10 billion. The popular German magazine Der Spiegel reported: “The WHO and those in charge of public health, the virologists and the pharmaceutical laboratories....  created a whole system around the imminence of a pandemic. There is a lot of money at stake, as well as networks of influence, careers and whole institutions! And the minute one of the flu viruses mutates we'd see the whole machine roll into action.” Epidemic of Conflict of Interests According to former World Bank geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig, about half of the WHO's budget is derived from private sources -- primarily pharmaceutical companies but also other corporate sectors including the telecommunication and agro-chemical industries. It also receives large donations from large philanthropic organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It is believed, according to Koenig, that the appointment of the WHO's current Director General, Dr. Tedro Adhanom, was due to Gates' influence. Tedros is the former Chairman of Gates funded GAVI Vaccine Alliance. GAVI's sole mission is to vaccinate every child in the world. The WHO and the US and British governments are the primary partners and the largest funder is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. There is in our opinion little doubt that the WHO is another one of Gates' bought off entities for furthering his personal agenda to promote vaccines, genetically modified seeds and chemical agriculture in the developing world. Barbara Loe Fisher at the National Vaccine Information Center estimates that "only about 10 percent of total funding provided by Gavi ($862M) was used to strengthen health systems in developing countries, such as improving sanitation and nutrition, while nearly 80 percent was used to purchase, deliver and promote vaccines." The WHO as America's Poodle According to the Kaiser Family Foundation's fact sheet for the US government and WHO, the US is the largest contributor to the global organization. The CDC also provides its technical support and has liaisons at the WHO's Geneva headquarters and regional offices. In summary, there is a strong rationale to suggest that the WHO, aside from its global health programs in other countries, is largely doing the bidding of the US government to advance corporate interests and American neoliberal hegemony. Vaccine Adverse Effects Monitoring System Needs Overhaul The WHO's Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety is the group responsible for administering vaccine programs in poorer, developing countries. It is also responsible for gathering data on incidents of vaccine injuries. Any deaths following vaccination campaigns are ignored and ruled as coincidental. This policy is based on the erroneous assumption that if no one died during a vaccine's clinical trials, then the vaccine should be regarded as automatically safe and unrelated to any deaths that might occur. Consequently, the WHO's monitoring system is seriously flawed and requires a major overhaul. One of the more controversial incidences is the WHO's collaboration with the Bill Gates funded GAVI Vaccine Alliance campaign to launch the pentavalent vaccine (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, HIP and Hepatitis B)  in Africa and later in South and Southeast Asia. In India, health officials recorded upwards to 8,190 additional infant deaths annually following pentavalent vaccination.  The WHO response was to reclassify its adverse event reporting system to disregard "infant" deaths altogether. Dr. Jacob Puliyel, a member of the Indian government's National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization concluded, “deaths and other serious adverse events following vaccination in the third world, that use WHO-AEFI classification are not recorded in any database for pharmacovigilance. It is as if the deaths of children in low (and middle) income countries are of no consequence.” The WHO's Director General's Troubled Past Given the enormous number of experts in infectious disease and control, it is astounding that the WHO's current Director General is Dr. Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus. He was a leading politician in the militant communist Tigray People's Liberation Front that ruled Ethiopia between 1991 to 2018.  Tedros served dual roles as the country's Health and Foreign Minister. According to the British journalist Thomas Mountain, who has lived in neighboring Eritrea for many years and has reported on the corrupt Tigray regime, Tedros had a direct role in the atrocities alleged to have been committed by the government.  It was Tedros who has been reported to have been responsible for the removal of the Red Cross and Doctors Without Borders following Ethiopia's brutal massacre of Ogaden citizens in Somalia, which was immediately followed by a cholera outbreak. As noted above, his approval to head of the organization may likely have been vetted by Bill Gates. Looking back at his past three years at the WHO, Mountain remarks, "For almost three years he remained quiet about the almost total lack of preparation at the WHO for what numerous panels had warned was inevitable, a highly contagious and deadly virus quickly spreading across the world." WHO's Depopulation Efforts with Vaccines Without doubt, the most nefarious activity conducted by the WHO is its alleged support and distribution of vaccines to poorer developing countries that may have been intentionally designed to decrease population rates.  Back in 1989, the WHO sponsored a symposium at its Geneva headquarters on "Antifertility Vaccines and Contraceptive Vaccines." The symposium presented proposals for vaccines that were later discovered to have been laced with the sterilizing hormones HCG and estradiol; the former prevents pregnancy and triggers spontaneous abortions and miscarriages, and the latter can turn men infertile.  In 2015, the Kenyan Conference of Catholic Bishops reported its discovery of a polio vaccine laced with estradiol that was manufactured in India and distributed by the WHO. A year earlier, Dr. Wahome Ngare from the Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association uncovered a tetanus vaccine specifically being administered to women, also distributed by the WHO, that contained the HCG hormone. All of the polio vaccine samples tested contained HCG, estrogen-related compounds, follicle stimulating and luteinizing hormones, which will damage sperm formation in the testes. Even more disturbing, this vaccine was going to be administered to children under five years of age. However, this is not the first time the WHO appears to have made efforts to use vaccination campaigns for depopulation.  A decade earlier, in 2004, the WHO, UNICIF and CDC launched a vaccination campaign to immunize 74 million African children during a polio outbreak. The initiative encountered a serious obstacle. In Nigeria, laboratory tests on the WHO's vaccine samples resulted in the presence of estrogen and other female hormones. And in the mid-1990s, a tetanus vaccine being administered to Nicaraguan and Filipino girls and women in their child-bearing years was discovered to contain HCG, which accounted for a large number of spontaneous abortions that were reported by Catholic health workers. Illegal Vaccine Experiments In 2014, The Economic Times of India published a report that provided details of a joint venture between the WHO and the Gates Foundation to test an experimental HPV vaccine on approximately 16,000 tribal girls between the ages of 9 and 15 unwittingly. The experiment was conducted in 2008, and the vaccine is now what we commonly know as Gardasil. Many of the girls, the report states, became ill and some died. The following year the WHO and Gates Foundation conducted a similar experiment on 14,000 girls with the HPV vaccine Cervarix. Again "scores of teenage girls were hospitalized."  Investigations led by Indian health officials uncovered gross violations in India's laws regarding medical safety. In numerous cases there was no consent and the children had no idea what they were being vaccinated for. The Indian Supreme Court has taken up a case against the duo for criminal charges. WHO's Double Standards of Vaccine Safety A more recent scandal erupted during the WHO's Global Vaccine Safety Summit convened in December 2019.  Days before the summit, one of the WHO's medical directors for vaccination, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, appeared in a public advertisement touting the unquestionable safety of vaccines and ridiculing parents who speak out against vaccination. She assured viewers that the WHO was in control of matters and monitored any potential adverse risks carefully. However, during the Summit, the same Dr. Swaminathan acknowledged vaccine health risks and stated, "We really don't have very good safety monitoring systems." Another Summit participant, Dr. Heidi Larson stated, "We have a very wobbly ‘health professional frontline' that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. When the frontline professionals are starting to question or they don't feel like they have enough confidence about the safety to stand up to the person asking the questions. I mean most medical school curriculums, even nursing curriculums, I mean in medical school you are lucky if you have half a day on vaccines.” And more noteworthy were the statements by Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator of the WHO's Initiative for Vaccine Research, "... I give courses every year on how do you develop vaccines, how do you make vaccines. And the first lesson is while you're making your vaccine if you can avoid using an adjuvant please do so. Lesson two is if you're going to use an adjuvant use one that has a history of safety. And lesson three is if you're not going to do that, think very carefully." In other words, what the WHO presents to the public contradicts what is discussed behind closed doors, another example of the veil of secrecy the organization operates within. Suppression of the Dangers of Depleted Uranium The use of depleted uranium pervades military missiles and bombs. Tons of depleted uranium were deployed during the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.  It is estimated that the US fired over 300,000 rounds of depleted uranium, or 1,000 tons, during the 2003 Iraq war. In both countries, the WHO has been very active in providing health needs to the populations affected.  However, in regions where bombing was most intense, such as in Fallujah Iraq, there has been a high prevalence of congenital birth defects. This was uncovered by an on-the-ground investigation conducted by the Brussels Tribunal.  According to a BBC documentary, there is no longer any doubt about depleted uranium's association with genetic damage and birth defects.  According to an article published in the British Medical Journal in 2013, the WHO intentionally suppressed the scientific evidence .  The question remains why?  Hans von Sponeck, a former Assistant Secretary General for the United Nations has suggested that "the US government sought to prevent WHO from surveying areas in southern Iraq where DU has been used and caused serious health and environmental dangers."  Here we find a likely case of the WHO doing the bidding of the US government and its military adventures in regime change. There are many other questionable activities that the WHO has been involved with over the years. However, the above provide sufficient evidence to argue the case that, at least within the upper echelons of the WHO, global health does not stand in high priority.  The organization employs over 7,000 people around the world and most of these have deep concern for improving the lives of populations in poor and developing nations. On the other hand, the WHO's leaders are there largely because the powers of Washington, London and the pharmaceutical industry benefit by the organization advancing its agendas. Of course, the WHO is not the only health entity with a legacy of corruption.  Corruption appears to be systemic throughout global health and national health agencies.  This topic was featured last year in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet. Author Dr. Patricia Garcia writes, "Corruption is embedded in health systems. Throughout my life—as a researcher, public health worker, and a Minister of Health—I have been able to see entrenched dishonesty and fraud. But despite being one of the most important barriers to implementing universal health coverage around the world, corruption is rarely openly discussed." Bear in mind, the WHO, along with Bill Gates and his Foundation, and Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Disease, are leading the efforts to develop a COVID-19 vaccine. Do you believe we can trust their judgment and the intense public relations effort that will immediately follow after such a vaccine reaches the market?  

Peter Koenig has spent the last decade researching principles for how founders organise and materialise their enterprises, projects and initiatives – what he calls sourcework. We talk about the role of source and source principles and the idea of seeing organisations as energetic fields. We talk about why his work has sparked debate in “new ways of working” circles, as well as how we can use the lens of source to diagnose decentralised organisations when we seem to get stuck. Peter also shares some insights from 30 years of running money seminars, and why money is such a great place to hide our deepest shadows. Resources: Upcoming money workshop (based on Peter's work) by Tim Malnick The Role of Source introduction workshop by Tom Nixon A website about source principles curated by Tom Nixon Peter’s website Tom Nixon’s blog about Reinventing Organisations and source (with a comment from Frederic Laloux at the end) Frederic Laloux’s video on new roles for top leaders, including the role of source Peter’s book 30 Lies About Money

   What if tomorrow nobody but the United States would use the US-dollar?  Say begins a compelling article by our guest, Peter Koenig.  You might say, back up, I don't even understand what that means.  Well, we need to.  And so we lay out in a meticulous fashion the central role that the U.S. dollar … Continue reading EP 287 The World is Dedollarizing and You Need to Understand What That Means

This week on the Finding Impact Podcast, we are talking about burnout, corporate insurgency and a mental hospital. This is the second in the series of podcasts that we are covering on burnout and mental stress in the social sector. We are talking with Gib Bulloch about his personal experience of what he calls the ‘event' when he suffered from a burnout that put him in a mental hospital for 5 days and became the setting of his new book "The Intrapreneur: Confessions of a Corporate Insurgent". The book is an engrossing read on Gib's personal journey of burnout, and how he's turned it into an opportunity for others, to spark a new breed of social activists working within, or about to join, or completely disillusioned by today's business world.  Gib Bulloch is also the founder of Accenture Development Partnerships, a non-profit arm of Accenture, for building cross-sector partnerships between businesses and NGOs. On this podcast, you will learn:  How Gib first discovered the true meaning of working for ‘purpose', when he was volunteering with the VSO International in the Balkans after the Kosovo crisis. VSO partners with businesses to attracts mid-level corporate professionals and offers them volunteering opportunities. How this experience led to Gib conceiving and founding the Accenture Development Partners (ADP) in 2001, as a social enterprise within Accenture. ADP was conceived on the idea of bringing business and technology expertise to parts of the world where it is greatly needed but has least access to it, and its business model depended on the three-way contribution between people, ADP and the charitable organization clients. The ‘event', which became the inspiration of his new book and he quotes - "Looking back, the retreat in India couldn't have come at a better time for me. I'd signed up for an event organised by a group called Leaders' Quest that would see me spend four days in the Rajasthan desert. The retreat offered a mix of activities – discussions in small focus groups about the state of the world, visits to impoverished villages, talks by inspiring NGO leaders – even yoga and meditation classes. I'd gone to get myself out of the rut, out of the comfort zone – to find new inspiration to break the internal impasse I'd been facing. I got more than I bargained for." Why social entrepreneurs are more prone to stress and isolation when compared with business entrepreneurs. The jobs of people working towards a social mission are never ever done fully and it's very difficult to dis-engage like in a regular day-job. This leads to an incredibly high burnout rate in the sector. The Wellbeing Project (an initiative of Ashoka, Skoll and Schwab) recognizes this endemic problem in social entrepreneurship and works towards catalysing a culture of inner wellbeing for social entrepreneurs and changemakers How there is a fundamental challenge at the heart of business today - as the capitalist economic system with its single-minded focus on profit is creating tremendous amounts of corporate workforce dis-engagement and high levels of burnouts. Traditional corporate responses (yoga rooms, gym memberships, etc.) are mere tinkerings, whereas what is needed is a fundamental re-thinking and re-imagination of workforce burnouts. How organizations such as Thrive Global, established by Arianna Huffington, are working toward raising awareness of the hidden costs of workforce burnouts to business and economy The need to imagine another paradigm around people's relationship with money as most people are trapped in the hamster wheel where they feel the compelling need to have more and more money. Gib talks Peter Kuneig's ‘moneywork' and his book that exposes misleading flaws and lies in many universally accepted and unquestioned assumptions about money Finally, Gib shares that he saw in his manic vulnerability a source of strength which led him to write and try and break the taboo around mental health in business.  Links to Resources:  Gib Bulloch, The Bullog Newsletter Gib's Book: The Intrapreneur: Confessions of a Corporate insurgent Accenture Development Partnerships Organizations and resources mentioned in the podcast: VSO International, Leaders' Quest, The Wellbeing Project, Thrive Global, Peter Koenig: 'moneywork' and Money Seminars  Connect with Gib:  LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook

On the occasion of the historic events sweeping the UK Parliament in the past week, this week's Global Research News Hour focuses on the fate of the EU in the face of a contentious debate in the UK Parliament, and the Gilets Jaunes (Yellow Vest) movement that has overtaken the imaginations of the French population seeking alternatives to the EU order as manifested by Emmanuel Macron. Our first guest, economist and geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig examines the fall-out from Theresa May's devastating defeat last Tuesday the 15th, and elaborates on the past present and future of the EU project, including the prospect of military integration. Our second guest, Paris-based Diana Johnstone provides background and analysis of the Gilets Jaunes, reasons for its success, and the efforts by State and media authorities to suppress it.

7:02 am acknowledgement of country  7:04 am headline news, discussion of the racist dogwhistling by our government and the likes of Andrew Bolt drawing on a article in Green Left Weekly that analyses the politics of the situation and how the richest 20-percent of households own 62 percent of all wealth in a new report.7:15 am part two of a interview with Peter Koenig about the politics in Venezuela and the current developments from a economical perspective.  7:30 am recent developments in the My Health record scandal  7:37 am round-up of politics in Palestine from Israel attacking new Freedom Flotilla seeking to aid Gaza and how Palestinians still continue to defy apartheid  7:55 am international news in Green Left Weekly the state of politics in the UK  8:00 am activist calendar8:10 am interview with Sabella Kngwarraye Turner from the Strong Grandmothers of the Central Desert Region and Meret MacDonald about their demands for a bail review of Aboriginal children held in custody and their on-going fight to shut down Don Dale. 8:18 am more news from Green Left Weekly examining the Timor Spy case and it's political implications. 8:27 am closing of program.

7am: Welcome and Acknowledgement of country7.02 News for the week1. Media merger or takeover between Fairfax and channel 9 Discussion on media takeover/merger;  African “gangs” as per the racist governments and making laws on the basis of beat up by the channel 7 and the propaganda7.16: Interview with Peter Koenig re Venezuela Part 1 and the recent economic forum attended by him. Lalitha Chelliah interviewed him about the discussions and plans for Venezuela.7.40: More news: My health Record and the “opt in” and “opt out” discussions; What are the issues around making a decision. Security and access is a concern. East Timor and the theft by Australia. USA and Russian relationships as Trump and Putin meet. The incongruences between their view son Israel’s crimes against the Palestinians. Interference in the US elections and the hypocrisy of the US while it interferes in more than 80 nations especially the Latin American countries.8.00am Activists Calendar8.10 am Discussion with guests from a musical group and their organising a protest against Channel 7 television station and its racist attacks on the African community.8.30 Close

7am Acknowledgement of country 702am News:-Campaign Against Racism and Fascism protest against Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux tonight  -Victorian Liberal party relaunches racist "African gangs" witch hunt election pitch. African community organising protest on July 28 at channel 7 headquarters for their role in the renewed racist hysteria mongering. 716am Jacob and Zane speak with retired Hunter valley coal miner and ex CFMEU activist Dusty about a major employee privacy breach at BHP Billiton. PAYG group certificates were emailed to the wrong recipients, and employees have been threatened with immediate sacking if they complain about the stuff up on social media. 735 Green Left Radio's Lali Chelliah speaks with Peter Koenig, an economist and geopolitical analyst, about the recent Mexican election.The election saw left social democrat Andrés Manuel López Obrador ("AMLO") elected in a landslide; Koenig expoplores the opportunities and constrainst and AMLO governmentwill face as well as some of the sinister history of US meddling in Latin American and Central American politics. 754 News: Djap Wurrung Heritage Protection Embassy appeals to unions for support to protect Aboriginal cultural heritage including Scarred trees and dreaming sites in Western Victoriawhich is threatened by a highway upgrade. You can donate to the campaign here. 8am activist calendar 808am- music "Endless summer" by the Jezebels 812am News:- Amid new deadly airstrikes, Israel attempting to break Gaza once and for all - My health record opt-out process: privacy concerns as health records will automatically become part of lifelong database accessible by multiple agencies 5 Years Too Many – Bring Them Here!

Peter Koenig, Leiter von Geldseminaren und Autor der Buches «30 dreiste Lügen über Geld», gibt Auskunft über seine profunden Erfahrungen. Im Zentrum seines Interesses steht die Beziehung des Einzelnen zum Geld.

Peter Koenig war schon in jungen Jahren finanziell erfolgreich. Gut 30 Jahre alt, fragte er sich, ob dies nun alles sei. Was bedeutet Geld? Das Video zeigt, weshalb Leute bereit sind, ihm ein gutes Honorar zu bezahlen.

Wealth came early to Peter Koenig. At 30 he asked himself if money really was his goal. Today, he makes his living lecturing on the meaning of money. This video shows why participants are willing to pay a good salary for this kind of lecturing.

Europa in der Krise; die Schuldenberge werden immer grösser, die Politik ist am verzweifeln, die Weltwirtschaft am wegschauen und das Volk am rebellieren. Hauptdarsteller des globalen Theaterspektakels: GELD! Auf der persönlichen Ebene sieht es oft nicht anders aus. Ob Reich oder Arm, das Thema Geld beschäftigt beiderseits. Wir sind oft getrieben von Geld und Glaubensätze wie: Ich habe nie genug Geld. Geld ist ein notwendiges Übel. Ich habe Mühe Geld auszugeben. Ich habe Angst durch die Krise mein Geld zu verlieren. Geld ist mir nicht so wichtig. Ich bin dauernd auf der Jagd nach Geld und fühle mich leer und ausgebrannt. Wenn ich mehr Geld hätte, würde ich endlich mal..... Wenn ich im Lotto gewinnen würde, wäre ich ohne Sorgen. Ich bin abgestempelt wegen meines Reichtums. Ich habe einen widersprüchlichen Umgang mit Geld. Geld ist „nur“ ein Schein und bindet doch so viel Energie. Im Talkreich Interview mit Peter Koenig sprechen wir über die Bedeutung des Geldes und was für persönliche und kollektive Glaubensmuster hinter dem Geld stecken. Wir sprechen auch über das Aussteigen aus dem Geld-Spiel, die Transformation und Befreiung der Projektionen, aber auch über die aktuelle Krise, die der Spiegel unseres Bewusstsein darstellt.

Folge 8 Natürliche Ökonomie, Interview dem Geldforscher Peter Koenig Teil 2: Geldsysteme Hier ist Radio Joytopia Mit guten Nachrichten für Sie Ich heiße Bernd Hückstädt. Und ich begrüße Sie ganz herzlich: Tausend Dank weil Sie bei uns sind! In dieser Folge 8 geht es weiter mit der Serie Natürliche Ökonomie. Diesmal mit dem zweiten und letzten Teil des Telefon-Interviews, das ich mit dem Geldforscher Peter Koenig geführt habe. Seit über zwanzig Jahren betreibt Peter Koenig empirische Forschungsstudien über Zusammenhänge zwischen dem Umgang mit Geld, Geldsystementwicklungen und der Vitalität von Menschen und Organisationen. Er ist Begründer der internationalen Konferenzreihe "Money & Business Partnership? und Buchautor von ?30 dreiste Lügen über Geld?. Peter Koenig lebt als Engländer in Zürich. Im zweiten Teil unseres Interviews spricht er über Geldsysteme, den Umgang mit Frustration und die Perfektion der Welt. --- Peter, wir sprachen vom Geld als Projektionsfläche, auf die wir Bewusstseinsanteile von uns projiziert und damit ? ganz oder teilweise ? die Macht über unser Leben abgegeben haben. Dann sprachen wir vom Koenigsweg, nämlich wie wir eine Projektion nach der anderen zu uns zurückholen und dadurch wieder in unsere Kraft kommen. Was bedeutet das aus Deiner Sicht für ein Projekt wie Joytopia? --- O-Ton: Interview mit Peter Koenig Teil 2 ---- Also: Geldschöpfung ist kein Geheimnis mehr! Schon heute schöpfen wir Menschen das Geld selbst ? durch Kredit oder anders ausgedrückt durch Schulden! Merken Sie was? Wenn wir unsere Schöpferkraft ausleben, machen wir uns schuldig! Was für eine fatale Projektion, die wir mit dem Geld verbunden haben! Bei Joytopia, dem bei weitem entwickeltsten und genialsten Geldsystem, wie Peter Koenig sich ausdrückte, schöpfen wir Menschen ebenfalls das Geld selbst ? durch das Leben. Das Lebensgeld, wie wir es nennen, entsteht durch das Leben und fördert das Leben! Wenn Lebensgeld voll etabliert ist, schöpft jeder Mensch jeden Monat 3 mal 1000 DANK Lebensgeld: 1000 Dank Grundeinkommen 1000 Dank für den Staatshaushalt und 1000 Dank für den Ausgleichs- und Umweltfonds Deshalb sagen wir: 1000 Dank, weil Du bei uns bist! Stellen Sie sich vor: Ganz gleich wer Sie sind und was Sie tun: Sie sind herzlich willkommen! So sehr willkommen, dass sich die Gemeinschaft aller Menschen jeden Monat aufs Neue bei Ihnen bedankt: 1000 DANK weil Du bei uns bist! Wie fühlt sich das an? Bedingungslos Willkommen zu sein Bedingungslos versorgt zu sein 1000 Dank, weil Du bei uns bist! Fühlen Sie doch mal ganz tief in sich hinein! --- Und wenn Sie Ihre Erfahrungen und Erlebnisse mit uns teilen wollen, dann freuen wir uns ganz besonders: Senden Sie uns eine E-Mail an akademie@joytopia.net Oder rufen Sie an in Deutschland unter der Nummer 07940 546 0811 Dort haben wir die Box für sie eingerichtet, und die interessantesten Beiträge werden wir gerne in den nächsten Folgen veröffentlichen. Hier noch mal die Telefon-Nummer: 07940 546 0811 Sie erreichen uns im Internet unter www.joytopia.net Dort finden Sie natürlich auch unsere E-Mail-Adresse und die Telefonnummer. Wenn Sie meinen, dass dieser Podcast auch Ihre Freunde und Bekannten interessieren könnte, dann empfehlen Sie uns bitte weiter: www.joytopia.net Mein Name ist Bernd Hückstädt Tausend Dank, weil Sie bei uns sind!

Folge 7 Natürliche Ökonomie, Interview dem Geldforscher Peter Koenig Teil 1: Was ist Geld? Hier ist Radio Joytopia Mit guten Nachrichten für Sie Ich heiße Bernd Hückstädt. Und ich begrüße Sie ganz herzlich: Tausend Dank weil Sie bei uns sind! In dieser Folge 7 beginnen wir die Serie Natürliche Ökonomie mit der Frage ?Was ist Geld?? Und ich bin glücklich und dankbar, dass uns diese Frage ein Experte beantworten wird: Der Geld-Forscher Peter Koenig! Seit über zwanzig Jahren betreibt er empirische Forschungsstudien über Zusammenhänge zwischen Umgang mit Geld, Geldsystementwicklungen und der Vitalität von Menschen und Organisationen. Er ist Begründer der internationalen Konferenzreihe "Money & Business Partnership? und Buchautor von ?30 dreiste Lügen über Geld?. Peter Koenig lebt als Engländer in Zürich. Ich habe Peter Koenig vor einigen Tagen am Telefon interviewt. Seien Sie also gespannt! --- O-Ton: Interview mit Peter Koenig ---- Also: Bewusstseinsveränderung ist angesagt. Stellen Sie sich doch mal selbst die Frage: Was ist Geld? Schreiben Sie alles auf, was ihnen spontan dazu einfällt! Schreiben Sie so schnell wie möglich, so dass Ihr Verstand keine Chance hat, das Geschriebene zu bewerten. Anschließend schreiben Sie bei jedem Begriff auf einem neuen Blatt statt ?Geld ist dies der das? ?Ich bin dies oder das? Zum Beispiel: Statt ?Geld ist Sicherheit? schreiben Sie ?Ich bin Sicherheit? oder ?ich bin sicher, mit und ohne Geld? Fühlen Sie tief in sich hinein, wie sich Ihr Empfinden ändert! Schreiben Sie Ihre Gedanken auf, die Ihnen dabei kommen! Oder: Statt ?Geld ist schlecht? schreiben Sie ?Ich bin schlecht? oder ?danke, dass ich auch mal schlecht sein darf!? Erlauben Sie sich, alles zu sein, ganz gleich, ob sie es als positiv oder negativ empfinden. Fühlen Sie wieder tief in sich hinein, wie sich Ihr Empfinden ändert und schreiben Sie Ihre Gedanken auf, die Ihnen dabei kommen! Mit dieser kleinen Übung leiten Sie eine große Bewusstseins-Entwicklung ein. Sie holen sich alle Ihre Bewusstseinsanteile eines nach dem anderen zurück, die Sie bewusst oder unbewusst auf das Geld projiziert haben. Damit kommen Sie immer mehr in Ihre Kraft. --- Und wenn Sie das Gefühl haben, Ihre Erfahrungen und Erlebnisse mit uns teilen zu wollen, dann freuen wir uns ganz besonders: Senden Sie uns eine E-Mail an akademie@joytopia.net Oder rufen Sie an in Deutschland unter der Nummer 07940 546 0811 Dort haben wir die Box für sie eingerichtet, und die interessantesten Beiträge werden wir gerne in den nächsten Folgen veröffentlichen. Hier noch mal die Telefon-Nummer: 07940 546 0811 Sie erreichen uns im Internet unter www.joytopia.net Dort finden Sie natürlich auch unsere E-Mail-Adresse und die Telefonnummer. In der nächsten Folge hören Sie den zweiten Teil mit Peter Koenig zum Thema »Geldsysteme«, auch diesmal wieder mit erstaunlichen Erkenntnissen. Freuen Sie Sich drauf! Und wenn Sie meinen, dass dieser Podcast auch Ihre Freunde und Bekannten interessieren könnte, dann empfehlen Sie uns bitte weiter: www.joytopia.net Mein Name ist Bernd Hückstädt Tausend Dank, weil Sie bei uns sind!