Podcasts about sipa

Want a quick estimate of how much your business is worth? With our free valuation calculator, answer a few questions about your business, and you'll get an immediate estimate of the value of your business. You might be surprised by how much you can get for it: https://flippa.com/exit -- In this episode of The Exit, host Steve McGarry sits down with sales growth expert Mike Huey, President of Scalable Sales Solutions, to unpack one of the biggest hidden risks that can derail a business sale: founder-led sales. After spending 30 years in sales, scaling companies, and helping owners prepare for successful exits, Mike explains why buyers hesitate when revenue depends entirely on the owner and what founders can do to build a sales organization that actually transfers. Mike shares tactical advice on when business owners should finally take off the “sales hat,” how to build a repeatable sales system, and the common mistakes entrepreneurs make when scaling their teams. From compensation plans and accountability metrics to CRM systems, AI automation, and relationship handoffs, this episode is packed with practical strategies for founders looking to increase enterprise value and make their business more attractive to buyers. Whether you are preparing for an exit or trying to scale smarter, this conversation offers a roadmap to building a company that can thrive without you. -- Mike Huey is the President of Scalable Sales Solutions and a sales growth strategist with more than 30 years of experience in sales, sales leadership, and business scaling. After helping companies prepare for acquisition, Mike became SIPA certified in exit planning and now works with founders to remove themselves from founder-led sales, build scalable systems, and increase business value ahead of an exit. He is also the author of Make Your Company Scalable and Saleable. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikehueysales/ Website: https://www.scalablesalessolutions.com/ -- Key Timestamps: [00:01] Steve Introduces Mike Huey [03:05] Mike Huey's Sales and Business Background [04:16] The Importance of Transferable Sales Systems [04:51] Steps to Make a Sales Org Transferable [06:25] When to Transition Sales Responsibilities [07:36] Implementing Effective Sales Systems and Playbooks [08:44] The Role of Relationships in Business Transfer [09:40] Gradual Handoff of Sales Accounts [11:13] Common Mistakes in Sales Transition [11:53] Mistakes Entrepreneurs Make in Sales Transition [12:47] The Ego Trap in Sales Management [13:45] Importance of Compensation Plans and Structure [15:12] Restructuring Sales Teams for Growth [16:23] Buy Side: Key Factors When Acquiring a Business [17:35] Assessing Sales Team Accountability and Metrics [18:45] Organizational Structure and Industry Fit [21:31] Using CRM and AI to Increase Sales Efficiency [25:16] Leveraging Data and Knowledge Sharing in Sales Teams [25:44] Increasing Business Value Through Sales Systems [27:52] Advice to Future Entrepreneurs and Business Owners [29:46] About Mike Huey and Scalable Sales Solutions -- The Exit — Presented By Flippa A 30-minute podcast featuring expert entrepreneurs who have been there and done it. The Exit talks to operators who have bought and sold a business. You'll learn how they did it, why they did it, and get exposure to the world of exits, a world occupied by a small few, but accessible to many. To listen to the podcast or get daily listing updates: flippa.com/the-exit-podcast/

The summit in Beijing produced a "constructive strategic stability" framework and a warming of tone between the two presidents. But heads of state can announce a multi-year horizon; somebody else has to operationalize it. Does the United States have the people — the linguists, the regional experts, the long-haul institution-builders — to do that work?This week, I chatted with two Texans answering that question from very different directions. David Firestein is the inaugural president and CEO of the George H.W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations in Houston. A career State Department officer who served four administrations and spent five years in Beijing, he's one of the few Americans concurrently affiliated with both a Republican and a Democratic presidential legacy institution. Eddie Conger is a retired Marine major and the founder and superintendent of International Leadership of Texas (IL Texas) — a public charter network of 26 campuses serving 26,000 K-12 students and now the largest K-12 Chinese language program in the country. In January, IL Texas became the first-ever K-12 recipient of the Bush China Foundation's George H.W. Bush Award for Educational Excellence in U.S.-China Relations, joining past honorees including Jimmy Carter and Henry Kissinger.The conversation tackles what David calls the Texas paradox: the same state that just forced its cities to dissolve their sister-city ties with China, that pioneered the closure of Confucius Institutes, and that has restricted Chinese land purchases is also where the country's deepest K-12 Mandarin pipeline is taking root — and where the most institutionally Texan China foundation has chosen to plant its flag. David and Eddie talk through engagement honestly (no straw-man Jeffersonian-democracy fantasies), the erroneous strategic assumptions undergirding U.S. China policy, what real national-language capacity would look like operationally, what they each saw in the Trump–Xi summit, and what 5,000 IL Texas graduates are already doing in the world.05:40 — Eddie's path: Marine infantryman to fifth-grade math teacher to the country's largest K-12 Mandarin program09:12 — David on when the Nixon-through-Obama engagement consensus broke (fall 2017) and how the lexicon shifted13:30 — Engagement honestly defined: what its architects actually believed vs. the Jeffersonian-democracy straw man18:30 — The Texas paradox: HB 128, sister cities, Confucius Institutes — and the country's biggest Mandarin program in the same state31:26 — Texas business, Tim Dunn, faith, and the gap between political rhetoric and where Texans actually are41:54 — The Defense Department safety/security story: when one Chinese word ate an entire bilateral agreement46:16 — David's six (or seven) erroneous strategic assumptions: China doesn't want to be us, and it has benefited more than anyone from the current order52:28 — What real national-language capacity would actually look like: NSLI, WALARA, and why the pipeline still runs through one Marine major in Texas01:06:07 — Reading the Beijing summit: the warmth, the "constructive strategic stability" framing, and whether Trump's Taiwan call could blow it all up01:17:10 — Where 5,000 IL Texas graduates are now — White House interns, service academies, doctors, entrepreneurs, and one high-schooler who pulled a stranger out of the surfPaying it ForwardEddie: Carlos Carrasco; Emily, who is heading to Taiwan this fall on a one-year high-school program; and another student bound for the University of Texas at Austin who will be sent to South Korea for a semester as a freshman — a rarity at UT. And he closes with Miles, a high-school senior and Marine scholarship recipient who, just weeks ago at a national competition in Florida, heard someone screaming for help in the ocean, called for a boogie board, and swam out to save a drowning swimmer while a crowd of adults stood on the beach. "Others before self," as Eddie puts it — the IL Texas mission statement made flesh.David:Frank Zhou, who just graduated from Harvard and chaired the Harvard College China Forum; Selina Gong, a recent graduate of the Harvard Kennedy School involved in its annual China conference; and Dean Dai, a recent graduate of Columbia's SIPA who has been deeply involved in many of the most significant student-run China conferences in the country — and who, as it turns out, was one of the organizers of the University of Chicago U.S.-China Economy and Business Summit where Kaiser spoke earlier this month.Recommendations:Eddie: John Pomfret, The Beautiful Country and the Middle Kingdom: America and China, 1776 to the Present (Henry Holt, 2016)David: Stephen Roach, Accidental Conflict: America, China, and the Clash of False Narratives (Yale, 2022)Kaiser: David Grann, The Wager: A Tale of Shipwreck, Mutiny and Murder (Doubleday, 2023)Also mentioned: Stephen R. Platt, The Raider: The Untold Story of a Renegade Marine and the Birth of U.S. Special Forces in World War II (Knopf, 2024) See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

[powerpresss] My co-host Ken Suzan and I are welcoming you to episode 175 of our podcast IP Fridays! Today's interview guest is Bruce Dearling, patent attorney and partner at Hepworth Browne in the UK, and we talk about how non-technical features must be considered when assessing inventive step of patents at least according to recent decisions of the UK supreme court and the Unified Patent Court. Profile of Bruce Dearling UK Supreme Court Emotional Perception AI Limited UPC Abbot vs Sinocare But before we jump into this interesting interview, I have news for you: On May 20, 2026, the Swiss Federal Council adopted the fully revised Patent Ordinance, which will enter into force on January 1, 2027, together with the revised Patent Act. In the future, the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property will prepare a mandatory search report for each application; applicants can choose between a partially examined version and a full examination that assesses novelty and inventive step. The full examination costs an additional 300 Swiss francs, and renewal fees will increase by a total of eight percent over the 20-year term. On May 19, 2026, Asus entered into a licensing agreement with the Wi-Fi multimode patent pool managed by Sisvel, thereby ending all ongoing infringement proceedings. Sisvel bundles standard-essential patents in the pool from, among others, Atlantia, ETRI, and Mitsubishi Electric. On May 18, 2026, the UPC Local Chamber in Düsseldorf rejected Align Technology's application for a preliminary injunction against its Chinese competitor Angelalign. Angelalign may continue to sell its clear aligners within the UPC jurisdiction. Our partners Dirk Schulz, Ulrich Storz, and Wanze Zhang, together with Arnold Ruess, successfully represented Angelalign. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced midweek that, since October of last year, it has invalidated or is seeking to invalidate approximately 10,500 trademark applications and registrations in eleven administrative orders. Reasons include forged attorney signatures and the fabrication of non-existent filing requirements. This stems from ongoing abuse of the U.S. trademark system, primarily by non-U.S. applicants, which can lead to conflicts with validly registered trademarks for legitimate businesses. On May 12, 2026, the British Court of Appeal overturned a lower court decision that would have required Nokia to grant interim licenses for video coding patents. The court found that Nokia's license offer to the Taiwanese manufacturers Acer and Asus had already been made on RAND terms. In May, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a brief in the ongoing Corteva v. Inari litigation, expressing antitrust concerns regarding certain patent practices in the field of plant breeding. This marks the first time the agency has actively intervened in a biopharmaceutical patent dispute with implications for seed innovations. Episode 175 of the IP Fridays podcast was a conversation I will not forget quickly. My guest Bruce Dearling, partner at Hepworth Brown in the UK and a patent attorney for 36 years, took a case through every level of the British court system up to the Supreme Court and, in doing so, fundamentally changed patent law for AI inventions in the UK. The case is called Emotional Perception, and its effects reach well beyond British borders. Below I summarize the key points from our conversation. The full episode is available at IP Fridays. A. What Is the Emotional Perception Case About? The underlying invention concerns artificial neural networks. Specifically, it relates to a method of closing what is called the semantic gap at the output of a neural network. That sounds abstract, but the idea is straightforward: a neural network always produces an output that does not fully correspond to what a human would actually expect or feel. Closing that gap brings the system closer to human perception and human expectations. Bruce Dearling drafted this application himself and filed it at the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO). The Office rejected it as excluded subject matter, characterizing it as essentially a computer program as such. The legal basis for that rejection was the Aerotel decision from 2006. The case then went to the High Court, which found in favor of the applicant. The Court of Appeal reversed that decision. Then the UK Supreme Court stepped in and changed everything. B. The Aerotel Test and Its Flaws Since 2006, the Aerotel test had been the standard British method for assessing whether an invention falls within the excluded categories under patent law. It was a four-step approach: construe the claim, identify the actual contribution the invention makes to human knowledge, ask whether that contribution falls solely within excluded subject matter, and finally check whether the contribution is technical in nature. The problem Dearling described in our conversation is that Aerotel reverses the logical order of the analysis. You start with the contribution and only then ask about the exclusions under Article 52 EPC. The UK Supreme Court described Aerotel in its judgment as “unsound law” and overturned it. The EPO’s Technical Boards of Appeal had previously called Aerotel “disingenuous,” which at the time led to a public dispute between the British courts and the Boards. With the Emotional Perception ruling, that conflict has now been resolved in favor of harmonization with the EPO. C. What the UK Supreme Court Decided The Supreme Court made two central findings. First, the exclusion of computer programs “as such” is overcome as soon as a claim includes any piece of hardware. It does not matter whether that is a processor, a memory module, or any other component. The threshold is deliberately low. Dearling described this as the “any hardware” approach, which aligns fully with the EPO’s position following G1/19. Second, and in Dearling’s assessment the more important finding: when assessing inventive step, the invention must be considered as a whole. The Court introduced what it called an “intermediate step,” an analytical stage in which the interactions between all features of a claim are examined before the question of inventive step is addressed. Non-technical features cannot simply be struck out if they contribute to the overall technical effect of the invention. D. Inventive Step: The Intermediate Step This is the heart of the judgment. In EPO practice, Dearling said, it happens regularly that examiners strike through features they consider non-technical and thereby fail to assess the invention’s inventive step correctly. A recent Technical Board of Appeal decision, T 1249/22, already criticized this approach: a claim directed at a technical solution to a problem can be patentable even if the underlying problem is non-technical in nature. Dearling recalled a remark made by a Board of Appeal member at a hearing he attended years ago: “We understand that examining divisions can operate with a degree of mental laziness and that it’s too easy to throw too many things out of the basket when considering the issues of inventive step.” That quote stayed with him because it names a structural problem that the intermediate step now addresses directly. The British method for assessing inventive step is the Pozzoli test, which differs from the EPO’s problem-solution approach. The Supreme Court explicitly retained Pozzoli because the problem-solution approach, in its view, is structurally infected with hindsight reasoning: you already know the invention, you work backwards to formulate an objective technical problem, and then you ask whether it would have been obvious for the skilled person to arrive at precisely that solution. Dearling sees this as a source of unfairness toward genuine inventions. E. Alignment with the Unified Patent Court In April 2025, the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued a decision in Abbott v. Sinocare (APP_000000901/2025, judgment of 17 April 2025). Dearling pointed out that this decision uses language and reasoning strikingly similar to the UK Supreme Court’s Emotional Perception ruling of February 2025. That is significant because the UPC is bound neither by UK courts nor by the EPO. The overlap suggests voluntary convergence. Dearling reported a conversation with a person close to the EPO, whom he did not name, who used the word “permissive” to describe the UK Supreme Court’s approach and indicated that the EPO might move toward it. Whether and how quickly that happens remains to be seen. What is clear is that the UPC, as the new European patent court, is setting its own standards, and the question of how to handle non-technical features in inventive step assessment is now being asked at multiple levels simultaneously. F. Implications for the EPO and Practice The EPO is not directly bound by the ruling. It is an administrative body, not a court. Dearling is nonetheless optimistic that change is coming. On one hand, external pressure is building: when the UK Supreme Court and the UPC articulate similar principles, convergence becomes hard to resist. On the other hand, Article 27.1 TRIPS requires all contracting states to make patents available in all fields of technology. Examiners routinely striking non-technical features from AI claims and rejecting them on that basis sits uncomfortably with that obligation. For the underlying application in the Emotional Perception case, the ruling has a pointed consequence. The Supreme Court did not grant the patent itself; it referred the matter back to the UKIPO for reconsideration under the intermediate step. The Office’s subsequent response was, in Dearling’s words, unconvincing. He suspects the Office is attempting to reintroduce the Aerotel test through the back door. As a last resort, he has not excluded a judicial review, a procedure that does not simply challenge the substantive decision but holds the Comptroller General of Patents to account for whether the Office is deliberately circumventing the Supreme Court’s direction on the intermediate step. That is, as Dearling put it, “a nuclear option,” but one he would not rule out if the evidence in the file already suggests the Office is in contempt of court. There is also an international dimension. Singapore’s Intellectual Property Office launched a public consultation shortly after the ruling, asking whether Singapore should adopt the Emotional Perception approach into national law. That is British soft power operating in real time within the Commonwealth. G. Three Takeaways for Patent Practitioners At the end of our conversation I asked Bruce Dearling to distill the most important practical points. His first takeaway: make sure the claim contains hardware. This applies not only to UK and European applications but is simply good drafting hygiene. Without hardware in the claim, the application remains exposed. The second takeaway concerns the description. Anyone filing an AI invention needs to explain clearly which function is achieved by which piece of hardware, circuit, or software. Not as boilerplate, but as a complete technical account that describes the real-world effects. Dearling’s experience is that practitioners who write the claim first and fill in the description afterward run into trouble. The third takeaway emerged from the conversation itself: how the EPO assesses inventive step for AI inventions is not a settled question. It is worth following the development of UPC case law and any shifts in EPO practice closely. Anyone advising on AI patent applications today needs to know these arguments. H. Conclusion The UK Supreme Court’s Emotional Perception ruling is not a British footnote. It has declared the Aerotel test dead, introduced the intermediate step that brings non-technical features back into the inventive step analysis, and set off a convergence movement that is already visible at the UPC and still pending at the EPO. For everyone working in AI patent practice, whether in prosecution, examination, or counseling, this ruling is required reading. Rolf Claessen: Our interview guest on IP Fridays podcast is Bruce Dearling. He has been in the IP field and a patent attorney for 36 years and is partner at Hepworth Brown in the UK. Thank you very much for being on the podcast. Bruce Dearling: My pleasure, Rolf. Thank you for inviting me. Rolf Claessen: All right. We just met at the INTA annual meeting in London. And you talked about the UK Supreme Court case where you were involved. And the core questions were whether non-technical features would be considered when assessing inventive step of patents. Can you briefly summarize this case? Bruce Dearling: It’s a bit more than that. It started — I actually wrote the case. And I prosecuted it through the patent office. The patent office rejected the case for being excluded subject matter. So pretty much the excluded subject matter provisions in the UK are nearly identical. They’re as near as practical to the language of the EPC, so those of the European Patent Office — Article 52.2. But again, they apply as such. The actual technology relates to artificial neural networks. And the invention related to a very clever way of what is termed closing the semantic gap at the output of the neural network. So that means that in a neural network, there is always a discrepancy between the output of the neural network in terms of what it’s telling you you should be thinking essentially, and what reality is. So if you can close the semantic gap, then you align the neural network or the artificial intelligence system to better reflect human knowledge or human reactions and human expectations. So that’s really what the invention is about. There’s no point in going into too much detail with it — that’s the way it is. It’s very clever. So the UKIPO rejected this because they said it was essentially a computer program excluded from patentability as such. And they used a decision which is called Aerotel, which has been around since 2006. And that decision has caused considerable consternation and tension between the EPO Technical Boards of Appeal and the UK courts. Aerotel was described as being essentially disingenuous by the EPO Technical Board of Appeal. And the UK courts pushed back and said, you don’t know what you’re talking about. So that’s where it fell apart. So that’s where they rejected it for essentially being a computer program as such, possibly with a bit of business methods thrown in as well. But let’s leave that for the time being. So the case then went to the High Court and at the High Court, we won. The judge said, actually, it’s not a computer program. Neural networks aren’t computers. They’re not programs themselves. There’s more to them than that. And the invention as claimed is not excluded from patentability as such. The UKIPO obviously weren’t very happy about that because they liked their Aerotel case and so they appealed it. And they appealed it on several grounds, including a new one, which was that it was a mathematical method. The Court of Appeal decided that the UKIPO was right and that we were wrong, so we lost the case. So we then went to the Supreme Court. Well, actually, they denied us an ability to go to the Supreme Court. The court said no appeal. We went — actually, no, I think there is a bigger issue here — because we realized, or I realized at that point, that the work that we were doing was much broader than this. It requires real consideration of what an invention is at a fundamental level. So not only exclusions, but how inventive step is applied. And these issues were built into the case from the very beginning. And they sort of — I wouldn’t say crept up on the court as we went through — but they became more and more prominent to the extent that ultimately, when we made an application to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court went, yeah, we’ve got some issues here. We want to hear the full arguments on why this is not excluded from patentability, why Aerotel is potentially bad and how we more or less try to align ourselves with the European Patent Office. So that’s essentially what happened. And the Supreme Court hearing was last July. It took them the thick end of eight months to come out with a decision, which was issued in early February, at which point the entire legal landscape in the UK changed because they said we were right. The Patent Office doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Aerotel is bad. It’s unsound. That’s what they described it as — unsound law. It needs to be removed and we’re going to harmonize with the European Patent Office. So before I — I’m just going on a bit of a rant here, standing on my soapbox telling you what you already know. But the Aerotel test essentially was — it was a four-step test, past tense. So you firstly had to construe the claim. That’s pretty straightforward. Then you actually had to identify the actual contribution. This is what they said — identify the contribution. Really in this aspect, you’re asking what, as a matter of substance rather than form, the inventor has added to human knowledge. So that’s what they said the contribution was. And then they said, the next step in Aerotel was to ask, well, does that contribution fall solely within the excluded subject matter field or realm? And then they said, well, if you get through that question, then you check the actual contribution or the alleged contribution to see whether it’s technical in nature. So that’s the Aerotel test as it was. And what the Supreme Court in their unanimous final decision said was that Aerotel at best jumbles up the order. It reverses the logical order of the analysis by starting with the contributions and then addressing the Article 52 exclusions. And then finally it goes back to what the technical nature of the invention is about. So they really went, no, we don’t like any of this stuff. It’s bad, it’s stupid, it puts the cart before the horse. So, in the intervening period between finding the case and actually seeing it progress all the way to the Supreme Court, we obviously had the G1/19 decision from the EPO Enlarged Board. And they basically said that they are going to validate any hardware as the approach. And that’s essentially what the UK also went with. The UK Supreme Court said we’re going to say that the threshold of patentability — or the exclusion to patentability — is simply overcome by the inclusion in a claim of any piece of hardware, whether it’s a processor or a piece of memory or whatever. It doesn’t matter. Any hardware makes the invention a technical invention. So it’s a really low threshold to consider. And they then went, well, actually, if we now align and harmonize with the European Patent Office sensibly, then we need to look at how we assess inventive step, which is the other thing that we raised with the Supreme Court. In fact, we probably raised it at other times and in all the other instances as well, but it came to a head at the Supreme Court. So the Supreme Court then also went a bit further and said, well, actually, whilst we do like the global approach to assessing inventive step for all fields of technology — whether it’s chemistry or biotech or electronics or software or AI — we use a test called Pozzoli. So that isn’t problem-solution. We don’t like problem-solution. We think it’s not codified in the European Patent Office. It’s just a mechanism that the EPO has come up with to try to objectively assess inventive step. We don’t particularly think that’s appropriate. We like our approach called Pozzoli. That’s it. So we’re going to say with Pozzoli, however, in order to actually understand — particularly in the context of mixed inventions having technical and non-technical features — it’s necessary for the examiner to undertake the so-called intermediate step, where you have to look at the interactions between features within a claim. The invention is defined by the claim. That’s what the act says. That’s what everyone understands. It’s the invention defined by the claim. So you look at the claim features and then you have to understand the interactions that take place. And even if they are between technical and non-technical features, if they bring about an overall technical effect when you consider the invention as a whole, then your claim should be good and you can assess it for classical inventive step. So that’s really where we’re at. There’s a lot to unpack there already. It’s probably a podcast in its own right, but that’s the positive history of where we’re at. And I can keep going if you wish me to for a second and talk about why I think this is — we’ll just contrast it quickly with the problem-solution approach at the EPO and COMVIK. So for inventions in the computer-implemented field, they use COMVIK and the problem-solution approach. The Supreme Court said, as I said, they don’t like problem-solution. I think the problem-solution issue is that it is also inherently pre-baked with hindsight because you have to look at the invention and then step back and exclude those features which are common. And then you formulate a problem based on the function that the claim achieves. And then you’re asking whether or not it would be obvious for a skilled person to arrive at the claimed invention, having been given that hindsight-developed problem. So COMVIK is not great by any means. And we know from a practical perspective that examiners are only too willing to look at a claim and simply line through features which they believe are non-technical, whereas they don’t actually look at the interaction of those features in the context of the claim as a whole. There is also a decision — very recent one actually, about a year ago — T 1249/22, where the Technical Board of Appeal told the examiners and the examining division, you cannot do this. It’s okay to have a claim directed towards an invention in a non-technical field, as long as the invention is directed to a technical solution of that problem. I think it’s paragraphs 11 and 12 or 10 of that decision that are worth looking at. But they’re saying that in all fields of technology, it doesn’t matter as long as the technical solution is about technology — therefore, you should be able to obtain a patent as long as there is a realistic and appropriate technical effect. Be careful actually, Bruce — I don’t mean technical contribution, I mean technical effect. There’s a reason for that distinction. Rolf Claessen: The non-technical features are nevertheless used to assess inventive step in the UK now after this decision, right? Bruce Dearling: Yes, that is the intermediate step. The decision says you must look at the invention as a whole. It’s the important thing. There are a couple of issues that arise out of this. The first one is that you have to provide context for the invention. The Supreme Court never provided any specific guidance about how we deal with the intermediate step or what the exact test is, which is in some respects fine. It seems to be fairly clear that you just have to engage your gray matter — your neurons — to work out what is going on in the real world. And once you work out what’s going on in the real world, what the benefits are, then you look at whether or not the actual implementation of the invention fundamentally has a technical flavor to it, which is not just coding, not just simple coding, but it does something smarter. There’s a real technical impetus. There’s a technical effect. Now that actually brings me onto something I’ve postulated or said. I think the intermediate step will follow something like what I’ve termed the holistic character test, which essentially is: work out what’s going on in the real world. Then once you’ve worked out what’s actually being achieved, what the benefits are, what the invention’s concerned with, then you ask the question, how am I achieving it technically? And how is there a technical effect? How does the technical effect arise? That brings out a couple of issues. The first one is that it’s actually about the word “contribution” because it depends on how the word is used. So if you look at head note one in COMVIK, it uses the word “contribute” — how the non-technical feature contributes to the invention. So that’s an additive inclusive concept. The UK IPO historically, and arguably at the moment today whilst they’re trying to retrain their 400 examiners — which this has caused them to have to do — their idea of contribution is this backward-looking concept. So technical contribution and technical effect, I think — although we mix them up and interchange them — are distinct. Technical contribution: you’re looking backwards. Technical effect is what you look at when you look forward into what’s going on. So this is subtle — it’s really subtle, but it’s important. And once you realize that you are actually looking for the technical effects, then you’re on much safer ground. It’s much more objective in terms of the assessment. This might be somewhat contentious, because it’s the way I’m looking at this, but I’ve been working on this a long, long time and thinking about it for probably decades, worryingly so. So technical contribution and technical effects are probably not the same, where they are interchangeably used to mean the same thing within existing decisions. Rolf Claessen: And in the beginning you said, now that Aerotel is dead basically, it’s more harmonized with the EPO’s approach. But what I take from the discussion now is that maybe — especially in view of the problem-solution approach — it’s not fully harmonized with the EPO’s approach at the moment, right? Or did the UK Supreme Court get something wrong, or was that a desired outcome from your point of view that this is not so completely harmonized with the EPO? Bruce Dearling: Well, the EPO — the any-hardware solution is fully harmonized, no doubt. So it’s now a question of inventive step under Article 56 or Section 3 of the Act. The EPC nowhere mandates the use of problem-solution. And we know that there are many different ways of actually assessing inventive step, including the concrete elaboration test from last year and problem-of-invention approaches. So there are numerous ways of assessing inventive step. So the UK says, “Pozzoli — we like Pozzoli.” Interestingly, I had a discussion with someone I probably can’t mention. They’re saying that the UK approach may actually be more permissive now. It might even influence how the EPO operates. So they may move away from COMVIK towards more of a Pozzoli approach, which basically says this: You identify the notion of the skilled person — step one. You identify the common general knowledge of that skilled person — step one B. You identify the inventive concept of the claim in question, where you construe it if you can’t work out what it is. You then identify what the differences are. And then you ask the question, is it obvious to the skilled person, given knowledge of the common general knowledge? This is entirely not artificial because, as I said beforehand, when you look at problem-solution, you are formulating a problem by backtracking from what the claimed invention is to a situation where you say, well, these are the common features and I’m going to project a problem to try and solve. Now that is already tainted with hindsight reasoning. It’s not safe, it’s not thoroughly objective. There is an inherent problem with this which sees good inventions cast by the wayside. Although it’s a preferred mechanism, it’s not fully baked. There are situations where examiners are inherently lazy, or they just simply use something like the requirements specification argument, which is just factual. It just demonstrates that they can’t be bothered to actually argue it properly or think about what the invention is. Sorry to any examiners listening to this, but this is just my personal view, that sometimes there are problems. I’m reminded of a quote from an EPI hearing I was at a long time ago, where the Legal Board of Appeal member said: “We understand that examining divisions can operate with a degree of mental laziness and that it’s too easy to throw too many things out of the basket when considering the issues of inventive step.” Now that one has stayed with me because you think — did someone just say that? And the answer is yes, they did. But it just goes to show that there is some tension between the TBA and the examining divisions, and they don’t always get it right. Rolf Claessen: So there might be a small difference now between the UKIPO’s future approach of assessing inventive step and the EPO? Bruce Dearling: Yeah, it might do. But the other interesting thing here — and thank you for pointing this out, I hadn’t entirely caught up with it, I’ve been traveling beforehand and I missed some of the UPC case law. So the UPC case law — in, was it — yeah, we talked about that. Rolf Claessen: Yeah. There was a decision in April, Abbott versus Sinocare. Bruce Dearling: Yeah, 901 of 2025. So a Court of Appeal decision from the UPC. It was APP_000000901, I believe, 2025. Decision 17th of April, hearing 27th of March. The UPC is not bound by — it’s a court. The European Patent Office is not a court, it’s an agency that administers and looks after the administrative rule of law. So the fact that this decision came out from the UK Supreme Court in February, and you see almost identical language used in the UPC decision, suggests that there is some alignment here, or some convergence in thought. Now, whilst the UPC decision also references G1/19 and uses problem-solution, there is enough — you’ve got to bear in mind that high-level courts do look at each other’s decisions. And this is really a question of influence and the desire to converge. So the fact that they’ve done this at this time is quite interesting. Again, I can’t quote someone directly from the EPO, although I would love to. They were saying — at a very high level — and they used the words “converge UPC practice towards UK Supreme Court practice on interpretation of the law.” So this may actually be happening in real time. Again, it would be wrong to actually refer to anyone by name, but it’s an observation that when I looked at the case, I can see why this is going ahead. And I can see why the judiciaries — they want to maintain independent judicial controls. They won’t reference the UK Supreme Court decision, not least because we’re not in the UPC. But if you look at the arguments in sections 106 and 107 of the UK Supreme Court’s Emotional Perception decision and head note one, you go — wow, this is very close. Rolf Claessen: Very close and nearly identical wording. Yeah. And the UPC also now uses non-technical features for assessing inventive step. Is that a problem for the EPO that has historically been aggressive in throwing out non-technical features for inventive step analysis? Bruce Dearling: Well, I think they really need to get to the situation — I don’t know — this holistic character test that I’m sort of proposing, where you really have to think about what the invention is achieving, and then look at how it’s technically being achieved. And then if you look at that again in the context of that other decision I mentioned — T 1249/22 — it says something like, in the case of an invention that amounts to a technical implementation of a non-technical method, provided the non-technical method does not contribute to the technical character of the invention. The board validated the approach of identifying the non-technical method and then goes through and says it’s patentable. There are decisions like this which suggest that examining divisions have to give it a bit more thought, because the Technical Board will realize that to satisfy the WTO requirements — which pretty much everyone is bound by — Article 27.1 TRIPS, which requires that you protect all fields of technology. And that means whether it’s data processing or business methods, because business methods can be patentable so long as they are implemented on a technical basis. That essentially seems to be what T 1249/22 is saying, although it doesn’t explicitly say “allowing business methods.” The exclusion is only “as such.” So does this decision, in combination with the Supreme Court case and the movement of the UPC, say: well, actually, let’s look at this properly? It requires objective assessments, not just superficial “let’s strike through that feature because I don’t like it, it looks non-technical.” Rolf Claessen: So are you hopeful that the EPO is adjusting and will reshape their case law in view of the UPC decision and the UK Supreme Court decision? Bruce Dearling: It’s a bit unfortunate that the corresponding UK case at the EPO was dropped by the applicants, because it was heading towards an examination hearing at the examining division. It would have gone to the TBA, and I’m sure it would then have gone from the TBA to the Enlarged Board. I’m pretty sure that’s the case. There is another case from the same client which will probably argue the same thing because the specs are almost identical. It’s just lagged in time. So is it going to change? I hope so, because I think the EPO have got it wrong — more often than not in this field. Well, maybe not more often than not — they get it wrong more times than they should do. Would I like to see it changed? Yes, I would, because I want the examiners to actually think about the technology as opposed to just — oh, it’s not — I don’t want to engage the gray matter. That serves no one. That doesn’t serve technology. That doesn’t serve industry. These patent rights are there for a reason. They are property rights. I’m referring to the award of the 2025 Nobel Prize for Economics — they are a core driver for society’s development. So the 2025 Nobel Prize was for something called creative destruction — the replacement of old technology with new — and it’s based on the patent paradigm. So all this stuff is coming to a head now. It’s just a question of how quickly the EPO actually catch up, and maybe they have something to catch up on. It’s just understanding that the examiners have to start to think. As I said, we’ve got the issues at the UKIPO where they’re going to have to retrain 400 examiners. Rolf Claessen: Yeah, right. Bruce Dearling: The Emotional Perception case wasn’t granted by the Supreme Court. They referred it back to the patent office for consideration under the intermediate step. So the patent office produced a response that I would describe as — I’d say arguably — not well reasoned, which I’ve filed the response to, which basically says you don’t really know what you’re talking about. What really worries me a bit is that I think they’re trying to introduce the Aerotel case through the back door. It’s backsliding. It’s a mechanism for trying to apply it in a different way or a different context, which would be wrong. I think they believe that the applicant will appeal this if they get a bad decision — they will appeal it back to the courts again via the High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court route. I say maybe not. I say maybe the client will file what they call a judicial review, which is a nuclear option. That’s when you actually hold the Comptroller General of Patents to account and get full discovery of whether or not there’s internal documentation showing that they are deliberately circumventing the direction of the Supreme Court on the intermediate step. This is basically holding them to account and saying: if you’re not applying the intermediate step appropriately, you are in contempt of the law. So judicial review is a really serious thing to do, but it’s certainly something I would not exclude from consideration. We’ll see what happens. It’s not saying we’re just going to go through the courts and make them decide on this. We’re going to say you’re wrong. And there’s already enough evidence in the files to suggest that they are probably in contempt of court and they’re not applying the intermediate step appropriately. They may not know any better at the moment — they need to be guided — but the consequences for them are potentially severe. Rolf Claessen: I have another question for you. You were the instructing attorney — do you think the decision was perfect? What argument that you made was the most underappreciated by the court? And where do you think the judgment got it wrong, or was it all perfect? Bruce Dearling: No, it got 90% or 95% correct. The intermediate step is right. That’s the most important thing in the decision — it’s the intermediate step. The any-hardware thing — that’s logical, that makes some sense — but if people say “if the any-hardware rule is the important bit,” no it isn’t. It’s the intermediate step. That’s the important thing. Where do they go wrong? I think they went wrong because — and you’ve got to bear in mind that unlike German courts, I’ve got to be careful about how I express this — generally, as I understand it, and correct me if I’m wrong, but the judiciary in Germany on patent cases are generally more technically able. They’re normally technically qualified. I look at the Supreme Court justices and the Court of Appeal justices — we had one who was a humanities undergrad, one was a chemist. Good luck with trying to argue complex artificial neural network technologies, which are difficult even for me to understand. And I’ve been working in the field. They’re hard to understand. They require real understanding, real appreciation. They could say, well, actually we don’t need to look at the technology — but frankly, if you’re looking at the statutes and exclusions to patentability and asking what a computer program is, then you need to understand what these technical terms really are. And if you can’t, then the judgment is potentially flawed. Their finding that the neural network is a computer program is, I think, technically obtuse. You know that the Singaporean government — the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore — released about six weeks ago a consultation note to the Singaporean profession and population, asking: is the Emotional Perception case right, and do we need to adopt it into Singaporean national law? So this is direct soft power from the UK Supreme Court changing Commonwealth legislation and statutes. We’ll see what happens. But from what I’ve seen of a draft response from the attorneys, they’re saying essentially: we agree any hardware is right, the intermediate step is right. The assessment of the neural network as a computer program is wrong, or it just doesn’t make any sense. And I’ve made the same comments before in SIPA, in the relevant round in March. There’s a disconnect. I mean, it’s like they equate a computer program with being able to be run on an analog computer. Now, an analog computer has no central processing unit. An analog computer just has resistors and transistors and capacitors. So if they’re saying that an analog computer can run a program — that’s essentially what they’re saying in part of the judgment. Where is the program in an analog computer? And if they’re saying it’s in the values of the resistors and the capacitors, then that has implications for any circuit we’ve got — it’s potentially a computer program — which is just madness, because it doesn’t sit well with the legislation and decisions we’ve looked at over the last 50 years. This is a real problem. It may be a storm in a teacup because you can overcome the objections by having any hardware, but it’s an argument they shouldn’t have been making. It seems to be abstract legal argumentation which has little credibility in my personal view, although it’s now law. It may be that someone can take that, have an argument with the Supreme Court, get them to fix this. The other thing is the EPO looks at a neural network as a mathematical method, and the UK now says it’s a computer program. Neither is right. The EPO is wrong as well. If you look at the actual decision which they regularly quote — the Vicom case — if you actually read the claim and look at the case, you see that it doesn’t make a huge amount of sense. A neural network has applied mathematics in it. It can be based on a computer program because it’s required to set up the learning objectives and the loss function. Mathematical processes — it tweaks the weighting factors of neurons over the course of the training epochs. But at the end of the day, if the function performed by the neural network is new and it’s directed towards a technical implementation which is technically relevant, then it shouldn’t fail for being a mathematical method. And I think the EPO guidelines actually say that. Even recommendations — the UK court said that a recommendation is not technical. Well, actually it is, because it’s data processing, and you’ve got to work out how does the data processing work to provide an improved recommendation? Again, it goes back to the T 1249/22 decision. There’s a whole raft of these things which are left not entirely resolved. There’s enough here to keep someone busy for a few more years. Rolf Claessen: Right. So I have a question for you now that we’ve talked about the decision of the UK Supreme Court and the UPC — the Unified Patent Court — with very, very similar wording. What do you say are the three most important takeaways for patent practitioners in the US, in Europe, in the UK, before the EPO? Are there any things that you really want patent practitioners to take away from our discussion here? Bruce Dearling: Yeah, okay. So first: make sure the claim has some structure in it. You need to have any hardware. That’s number one — in terms of claim drafting. In terms of the description, you really have to understand what the invention is about. And you’ve got to make sure that you explain what function is achieved by what piece of hardware, kit or software. And if you do that — don’t nickel-and-dime this by writing the claim first — I would suggest that you run into problems. You need to understand what the invention is about. And you need to make sure that the description is complete and full to describe the functionality and the effects that are achieved in the real world. And if you can do that, then you’re on a much sounder basis — much, much stronger. There’s a much stronger foundation for this. So that’s two things. Is there a third one? That’s me being a bit cheeky, but I suppose I know what’s going on. Rolf Claessen: Yeah, but maybe the third takeaway is that maybe the EPO will rethink the way — at least how AI inventions are assessed for inventive step. Bruce Dearling: Well, as I said to you before, it could be that that’s the case. I don’t want to repeat myself again. The word “permissive” was used in a conversation I had with respect to the UK Supreme Court approach. COMVIK fundamentally still breaks with me and has done for years, because the way it’s set up and the way it’s applied distorts fundamentally what the invention is about. And until such time as that distortion is removed, there is a problem of objectivity versus subjectivity. And I think that’s really what the EPO has to grapple with. It’s not an easy thing to deal with, but maybe there are things going on. Bruce Dearling: It’s not an easy thing to deal with. I don’t know who’s going to argue it. It would have been useful for me to still have the original case up and running at the EPO because these arguments would have been fleshed out. I’m pretty sure they would have been referred to the Enlarged Board. We would have got it resolved. So it’s whether or not I can now work this into the existing case to try and get the examining division to — well, they will refuse, I suspect. And then it’ll go to the TBA. And then the TBA will have to look at this, hopefully with the referrals to the Enlarged Board. And then that fixes the problem on a national and international basis. Rolf Claessen: Yeah. Let’s see. [Laughs] Bruce Dearling: No, we don’t know. I mean, you might have a different view. What do you think? Do you think COMVIK is fundamentally right or fundamentally wrong? Rolf Claessen: Well, I’m not so much into AI inventions. I’m a chemist and I usually deal with chemistry inventions. But from the discussion that we had, I think that the EPO might rethink their position. I don’t know. Let’s see. Let’s hope so. Bruce Dearling: Well, they liked it. They liked problem-solution. It’s been with us for 25 years. It suggests that it’s a compromise. It’s not mandated by the European Patent Convention — that’s the point. It’s something they think works. And these things only work until such time as someone comes along and says, actually, you’re wrong, and this is the reason. Rolf Claessen: Let’s see if they choose a different route at least for AI inventions. So Bruce, thank you very much for your insight and for talking about the case that you were involved in with the UK Supreme Court. Where could people reach you if they have more questions about this field — basically patents, AI protection in the UK and Europe — and if they want to ask you more questions about this case? Bruce Dearling: Sure. Through the Hepworth Brown website or my LinkedIn profile, I suppose. The Hepworth Brown website has an email link. I’m trying to post things on it as well to try and provide a bit more context. But if people have fundamental questions on this stuff, then I’m happy to try and answer them. I suppose that I can be considered to be quite knowledgeable in the area. Rolf Claessen: Right. Certainly more than I am. [Laughing] Bruce Dearling: So I was fortunate. As a consequence of the work I’m doing, I was appointed last year to the WIPO Standing Committee on Patents and Privacy. That was discussed for the issues of where WIPO goes and what the direction of the problems are that we have in high-tech areas. So there seems to be some degree of understanding that I might know what I’m talking about. I think I probably do. Rolf Claessen: Thank you, Bruce. Thank you very much for being on IP Fridays. Bruce Dearling: My pleasure. Thank you very much, Rolf.

La filière du sel en France, qui emploie près de 5.000 personnes, évolue avec les usages. Dans « La Story », le podcast d'actualité des « Echos », Clara Grouzis et ses invités racontent les nouvelles perspectives de la filière.« La Story » est un podcast des « Echos » présenté par Clara Grouzis. Cet épisode a été enregistré en mai 2026. Rédaction en chef : Clémence Lemaistre. Invités : Hubert Vialatte (correspondant des « Echos » à Montpellier) et Pascale Braun (correspondante des « Echos » à Metz). Réalisation : Willy Ganne. Chargée de production et d'édition : Clara Grouzis. Musique : Théo Boulenger. Identité graphique : Upian. Photo : Imagebroker.com/SIPA. Sons : BFM, TF1 et Storengy.Retrouvez l'essentiel de l'actualité économique grâce à notre offre d'abonnement Access : abonnement.lesechos.fr Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

As private markets mature and competition intensifies, investors are searching for ways to better measure risk, performance and true manager outperformance. Peer‑group comparisons and fund‑level IRRs may tell part of the story, but they are insufficient for knowing whether a GP is really achieving the alpha they might claim. In this episode, Frédéric Blanc‑Brude, CEO of Scientific Infra & Private Assets (SIPA), discusses why asset‑level data and benchmarking are becoming essential tools for investors. He explains how SIPA's indices were developed to address long‑standing private markets data gaps, why the firm recently joined PEI Group, and how asset‑level benchmarks can help LPs determine whether GPs are genuinely generating alpha, or simply telling a compelling story. Learn more about Scientific Infra & Private Assets at sipametrics.com

Le secteur des engins de construction s'inquiète de la montée en puissance de la concurrence chinoise, notamment dans l'électrique. Alors que les entreprises sont encore marquées par la crise de 2024 dans l'immobilier. Dans « La Story », le podcast d'actualité des « Echos », Pierrick Fay et Christophe Palierse s'interrogent sur les risques d'une offensive chinoise pour les constructeurs européens.« La Story » est un podcast des « Echos » présenté par Pierrick Fay. Cet épisode a été enregistré en mai 2026. Rédaction en chef : Clémence Lemaistre. Invité : Christophe Palierse (journaliste aux « Echos »). Réalisation : Willy Ganne. Chargée de production et d'édition : Clara Grouzis. Musique : Théo Boulenger. Identité graphique : Upian. Photo : Chine nouvelle/Sipa. Sons : LiuGong, Région Haut de France, RMCWow, Compte Facebook ATD travaux publics, Compte Facebook Groupe Gymdex, TF1.Retrouvez l'essentiel de l'actualité économique grâce à notre offre d'abonnement Access : abonnement.lesechos.fr Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Le 13 avril dernier, le cimentier Lafarge et ses anciens dirigeants ont été reconnus coupables de financement du terrorisme en Syrie. L'ex-PDG, condamné à six ans de prison, est immédiatement parti dans les geôles. Dans «La Story», le podcast d'actualité des «Echos», Clara Grouzis et ses invités retracent l'affaire et ses conséquences juridiques.« La Story » est un podcast des « Echos » présenté par Clara Grouzis. Cet épisode a été enregistré en avril 2026. Rédaction en chef : Clémence Lemaistre. Invités : Valérie de Senneville (reporter aux «Echos») et Yann Le Bras (avocat pénaliste au barreau de Paris). Réalisation : Willy Ganne. Chargée de production et d'édition : Clara Grouzis. Musique : Théo Boulenger. Identité graphique : Upian. Photo : Michel Euler/ap/SIPA. Sons : RFI, France Inter et euronews. Retrouvez l'essentiel de l'actualité économique grâce à notre offre d'abonnement Access : abonnement.lesechos.fr Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Buikpijn. Dat hebben we over gehouden na de laatste aflevering waarin we wat nieuwe 'bieren' gingen proeven. Gekke smaakjes, lage calorieën en nog minder alcohol. Brouwers doen hun best om de jongeren te verleiden, maar bier is duur, ongezond en geeft een kater. In deze aflevering bespreken we het waarom achter de trend en proberen we de voordelen van drank te bespreken. Op uw gezondheid dan maar!

Le week-end dernier en Allemagne, le parti social-démocrate (SPD) a perdu la ville de Munich au profit des Ecologistes et de son jeune candidat Dominik Krause. Dans « La Story », le podcast d'actualité des « Echos », Pierrick Fay et Emmanuel Grasland racontent les malheurs du parti de gauche allemand.« La Story » est un podcast des « Echos » présenté par Pierrick Fay. Cet épisode a été enregistré en mars 2026. Rédaction en chef : Clémence Lemaistre. Invité : Emmanuel Grasland (correspondant des « Echos » à Berlin). Réalisation : Willy Ganne. Chargée de production et d'édition : Clara Grouzis. Musique : Théo Boulenger. Identité graphique : Upian. Photo : Sven Hoppe/dpa/SIPA. Sons : BeinSports,@ZDFheute, extrait de « Bella Napoli », par Roy Bianco & Die Abbrunzati Boys, de « Ein Prosit » par Vocalys, la Musique des Voltigeurs de Québec et la Maîtrise des petits chanteurs du Cap, Diario AS, extrait du film « Les Bronzés ».Retrouvez l'essentiel de l'actualité économique grâce à notre offre d'abonnement Access : abonnement.lesechos.fr Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Did you know that 75% of the infrastructure the world will use in 2050 hasn't been built yet? That means the choices we make today—about roads, bridges, railways, ports, and power systems—will shape the future of both human development and the natural world. In this episode of Nature Breaking, WWF's Ryan Bartlett, Director for Climate Resilience and Risk Management, explains how we can build the infrastructure we need without destroying the ecosystems we rely on for critical benefits, including resilience to worsening weather extremes. From habitat fragmentation to increased flooding, poorly planned infrastructure can unintentionally cause huge environmental and social problems. But with the right planning tools, safeguards, and nature-based solutions that treat nature as infrastructure, we can chart a very different path forward. Links for More Info: Ryan Bartlett bio WWF Sustainable Infrastructure page Sustainable Infrastructure Program in Asia Greening Transportation Infrastructure Development (GRID) Chapters: 0:00 Preview 0:26 Intro 1:38 Challenges and opportunities with infrastructure development 4:37 Unintended consequences from poorly planned infrastructure 8:05 Best practices to balance infrastructure with nature & climate concerns 10:58 Solutions for infrastructure bisecting wildlife habitat 15:20 Asia as a key region for sustainable infrastructure 18:30 Sustainable Infrastructure Program in Asia (SIPA) 28:53 Lessons learned from SIPA 31:07 Greening Transportation Infrastructure Development (GRID) program 34:32 What does success look like for advancing sustainable infrastructure development? 37:39 Outro

Paranormal NL December 23rd, 2025 Guest Bios: In this UPRN 107.7 FM New Orleans & 105.3FM Gulf Coast Paranormal NL Podcast UPRN Segment #59 Spooky Canadian Christmas Special -host Jen Noseworthy talks with 3 Guests: Lee Hatfield, Logan Wagner, and Valter Nakamura-Joint-leads from SIPA Canada (Scientific Investigation of Paranormal Activity) out of Ottawa, Canada. Lee Hatfield has over 25 years of experience as a paramedic, firefighter, and (RAF) Royal Air Force Veteran in the UK which he brings to his work investigating the unexplained. Since moving to Canada in 2013, Lee deepened his Paranormal expertise & education through courses in Demonology, Cryptozoology, and the Poltergeist Phenomenon. Lee teaches a 4-week program on paranormal equipment to help others better understand and utilize investigative tools. Lee Hatfield is also with (PPRI) Paranormal Phenomena Research & Investigation https://www.ppri.net/ Logan Wagner is SIPA's technology and equipment lead specialist. Logan brings deep expertise in understanding, operating & developing paranormal instrumentation and investigative methodologies. Logan ensures SIPA field operations are grounded in scientific rigor & enhanced by cutting-edge tools and techniques. Valter Nakamura specializes in a wide range of spiritual studies and practices such as spirit communication, metaphysical & esoteric traditions, and soul-based exploration. Valter is SIPA's leading authority on spiritual and energetic phenomena. Valter's expertise provides a crucial balance to SIPA's investigative approach that bridges scientific methods with a deeper understanding of the spiritual realm. Big Shout out to Spirit Hunters Ontario founder Judy Mirault for introducing PNL to SIPA. (Spirit Hunters Ontario team members Debbie & Jen were on PNL Podcast S2/E82). Follow SIPA Canada at https://allmylinks.com/sipacanada Shout out to UPRN Producer Michelle Desrochers from Ontario, Canada. Michelle is also host of The Outer Realm Radio & Beyond the Outer Realm on UPRN. https://linktr.ee/michelledesrochers_ Jennifer Vallis (JV)-Noseworthy, RN (Jen) Paranormal NL (PNL) Podcast & BOG Team Founder/host "Paranormal NL (PNL) Podcast" Founder/Team Lead: PNL BOG Team. A "Boots on Ground" Paranormal Investigation Team Email: paranormal.nl.podcast@gmail.com Follow Paranormal NL Podcast & the BOG Team at https://linktr.ee/paranormalnlpodcast

C'est un aspect du conflit ukrainien encore peu documenté. Les soldats russes, depuis bientôt quatre ans de guerre, ont multiplié les graffitis sur les murs des zones occupées. Wall Evidence, un collectif basé à Kiev, répertorie et classe les photos de ces graffitis, comme des pièces à conviction. [Rediffusion] À ce jour, le collectif Wall Evidence a compilé près de 800 graffitis. Paul Dza, photographe à l'agence Sipa, participe à ce projet initié dès les premiers jours de la guerre, juste après les massacres de Boutcha. « Au milieu des débris, au milieu des appartements pillés et saccagés, on retrouve des messages, détaille-t-il. Ça peut être des messages qui sont adressés à la population ukrainienne. On retrouve par exemple, dans des appartements où les habitants ont été assassinés, des messages ironiques s'excusant pour le vacarme, s'excusant pour les dégâts qui ont été laissés. On retrouve des messages, par exemple, qui disent que l'Ukraine n'est pas un vrai pays. Il y a [aussi] des supermarchés dont les noms ukrainiens ont été barrés pour être remplacés par des noms russes. » Des graffitis comme outil de revendication Des graffitis omniprésents du Donbass au nord, à la région de Kherson au sud. « On imagine les soldats russes laisser des graffitis, poursuit Paul Dza. Pas dans un moment où l'assaut est en cours. Pas dans un moment où les combats font rage. C'est dans des moments d'entre-deux, des moments de latence, des moments d'attente, d'ennui. On les imagine en train de faire des graffitis en se disant "bon, il faut que je puisse dire à mes proches, à mon village, à ma région, que ce grand projet d'invasion de l'Ukraine, il faut que je le revendique". Donc, ils vont mettre la date, ils vont mettre la région d'où ils viennent. Et très souvent, ils sont pris en photo par les soldats russes et partagés sur des réseaux sociaux comme Telegram ». Un intérêt juridique et militaire Ces documents, accessibles aux chercheurs, éclairent sur le positionnement des unités russes et la temporalité du conflit. Grand reportageEst de l'Ukraine, lâcher du terrain ou combattre jusqu'au bout ? Et ceux retrouvés dans des lieux de tortures viennent aussi nourrir les dossiers des procureurs. Mais les graffitis russes, souligne Paul Dza, ont aussi un intérêt militaire : « Une unité qui va laisser beaucoup de graffitis - avec des noms, avec des pseudos, avec les villes d'origine - ce sont des informations tactiques qui sont utiles pour les soldats ukrainiens, qui vont en déduire que c'est une unité peu spécialisée, qui laisse beaucoup de traces, qui n'est pas discrète dans son avancée. »  « À l'inverse, continue le photographe, des soldats qui vont laisser de l'humour, des graffitis qui prennent énormément de temps à être faits comme des poèmes, des extraits de romans entiers qu'on peut retrouver parfois sur certains murs de zones occupées, les soldats ukrainiens peuvent en déduire qu'ils ont face à eux des soldats russes très confiants, sûrement expérimentés, et qui prennent le temps de laisser des graffitis élaborés sans pour autant donner d'informations tactiques. » Une plongée dans la tête des soldats russes Tag, signatures, les soldats russes laissent également sur les murs de nombreux dessins, indique Paul Dza : « Des dessins font des références à la Grande Guerre patriotique, et certains mettent en parallèle l'invasion de l'Ukraine avec la Seconde Guerre mondiale. On retrouve des étoiles rouges, on retrouve des faucilles et marteaux. On retrouve parfois des dessins avec des références à la culture pop, avec des références à des mangas. On peut retrouver des représentations plus élaborées comme des dessins de soldats représentés à échelle humaine. On retrouve par exemple des espèces d'envolées lyriques ou les soldats russes s'inspirent ou modifient les paroles d'une chanson, modifient le texte d'un poème qui parle de la mort, qui parle de la fin qui approche, mais que le but, le grand combat dans lequel ils sont lancés, continuera malgré leur perte. » Information brute, les graffitis offrent une plongée dans la tête des soldats russes, véritables reflets de la dynamique d'une armée d'occupation.

We are introducing you to the 309th Album of the Week - 'Stara slava' by Sacher, offering the HR Top 100 chart changes and bringing the local music news. Host: Ana Radišić

October 23, 2025 - Join us for a scene setter that explores the stakes and the storylines for The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum (APEC) 2025 summit, held in Gyeongju, South Korea from October 31 to November 1, 2025. This discussion, held one week prior to the summit, unpacks the most significant agenda items including trade, investment, and geopolitics, with special emphasis on the US, Korea, and the US-Korea relationship. The discussion features senior experts with firsthand experience, including: Ambassador (Ret.) Philip Goldberg, former US Ambassador to the Republic of Korea 2022-2025, and Kate Kalutkiewicz, Senior Managing Director of the Trade Practice at McLarty Associates and former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for International Trade at the National Economic Council. The moderator is Tom Byrne, President and CEO of The Korea Society, adjunct professor at Columbia University's SIPA, and former Senior Vice President for Moody's Investor Services. The priorities for this year's forum are: "Connect, Innovate, Prosper." In a preparatory meeting, senior officials from APEC members discussed "strategies for digital economy integration, public health cooperation, and strengthening APEC's role as an incubator of practical, consensus-driven solutions." As host nation, Korea's initiatives include: "addressing demographic change and the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence technology." APEC originated as a ministerial meeting of 12 Asian Pacific countries in 1989. The idea for the forum was proposed by Australian Prime Minister Bob Hawke during a trip to Seoul in January 1989. A leaders' summit was introduced in 1993 and a series of expansions increased the number of members to 21. South Korea previously hosted the ministerial meeting in Seoul 1991 and the leaders' meeting in Busan 2005. APEC's mission is to "support sustainable economic growth and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region." This program is made possible by the generous support of our individual and corporate Members, Columbia University's Weatherhead East Asian Institute, and the Korea Foundation. For more information, please visit the link below: https://www.koreasociety.org/policy-and-corporate-programs/2051-what-to-expect-the-2025-apec-summit-in-south-korea

C'est un aspect du conflit ukrainien encore peu documenté. Les soldats russes, depuis bientôt quatre ans de guerre, ont multiplié les graffitis sur les murs des zones occupées. Wall Evidence, un collectif basé à Kiev, répertorie et classe les photos de ces graffitis, comme des pièces à conviction. À ce jour, le collectif Wall Evidence a compilé près de 800 graffitis. Paul Dza, photographe à l'agence Sipa, participe à ce projet initié dès les premiers jours de la guerre, juste après les massacres de Boutcha. « Au milieu des débris, au milieu des appartements, pillé et saccagé, on retrouve des messages, détaille-t-il. Ça peut être des messages qui sont adressés à la population ukrainienne. On retrouve par exemple, dans des appartements où les habitants ont été assassinés, des messages ironiques s'excusant pour le vacarme, s'excusant pour les dégâts qui ont été laissés. On retrouve des messages, par exemple, qui disent que l'Ukraine n'est pas un vrai pays. Il y a [aussi] des supermarchés dont les noms ukrainiens ont été barrés pour être remplacés par des noms russes. » Des graffitis comme outil de revendication Des graffitis omniprésents du Donbass au nord, à la région de Kherson au sud. « On imagine les soldats russes laisser des graffitis, poursuit Paul Dza. Pas dans un moment où l'assaut est en cours. Pas dans un moment où les combats font rage. C'est dans des moments d'entre-deux, des moments de latence, des moments d'attente, d'ennui. On les imagine en train de faire des graffitis en se disant "bon, il faut que je puisse dire à mes proches, à mon village, à ma région, que ce grand projet d'invasion de l'Ukraine, il faut que je le revendique". Donc, ils vont mettre la date, ils vont mettre la région d'où ils viennent. Et très souvent, ils sont pris en photo par les soldats russes et partagés sur des réseaux sociaux comme Telegram ». Un intérêt juridique et militaire Ces documents, accessibles aux chercheurs, éclairent sur le positionnement des unités russes et la temporalité du conflit. Grand reportageEst de l'Ukraine, lâcher du terrain ou combattre jusqu'au bout ? Et ceux retrouvés dans des lieux de tortures viennent aussi nourrir les dossiers des procureurs. Mais les graffitis russes, souligne Paul Dza, ont aussi un intérêt militaire : « Une unité qui va laisser beaucoup de graffitis - avec des noms, avec des pseudos, avec les villes d'origine - ce sont des informations tactiques qui sont utiles pour les soldats ukrainiens, qui vont en déduire que c'est une unité peu spécialisée, qui laisse beaucoup de traces, qui n'est pas discrète dans son avancée. »  « À l'inverse, continue le photographe, des soldats qui vont laisser de l'humour, des graffitis qui prennent énormément de temps à être faits comme des poèmes, des extraits de romans entiers qu'on peut retrouver parfois sur certains murs de zones occupées, les soldats ukrainiens peuvent en déduire qu'ils ont face à eux des soldats russes très confiants, sûrement expérimentés, et qui prennent le temps de laisser des graffitis élaborés sans pour autant donner d'informations tactiques. » Une plongée dans la tête des soldats russes Tag, signatures, les soldats russes laissent également sur les murs de nombreux dessins, indique Paul Dza : « Des dessins font des références à la Grande Guerre patriotique, et certains mettent en parallèle l'invasion de l'Ukraine avec la Seconde Guerre mondiale. On retrouve des étoiles rouges, on retrouve des faucilles et marteaux. On retrouve parfois des dessins avec des références à la culture pop, avec des références à des mangas. On peut retrouver des représentations plus élaborées comme des dessins de soldats représentés à échelle humaine. On retrouve par exemple des espèces d'envolées lyriques ou les soldats russes s'inspirent ou modifient les paroles d'une chanson, modifient le texte d'un poème qui parle de la mort, qui parle de la fin qui approche, mais que le but, le grand combat dans lequel ils sont lancés, continuera malgré leur perte. » Information brute, les graffitis offrent une plongée dans la tête des soldats russes, véritables reflets de la dynamique d'une armée d'occupation.

Paranormal Insight with Tim Sudano welcomes Lee Hatfield Date: August 21st, 2025 Segment: 40 Topic: Paranormal Experiences About Lee Hatfield -A Brit now living in Ottawa, Canada. He served in the RAF, Fire Service and as a Paramedic before moving to Canada, where he now works for local Government His first Real paranormal experience was as a paramedic in England, attending a patient who was in Cardiac Arrest, and his colleague who was not his usual work buddy was a medium. During the Cardiac arrest he told Lee the patient was standing behind him, and was telling him that it was ok to stop doing CPR. He and two others, Logan and Valter created SIPA back in March 2024, after experiencing non motivated teams, so they decided to join forces. He has been hosting SIPA paranormal Chronicles since Feb 2025, and in his opinion, it has been going from Strength to strength

Sintonía: "Baba hastanede" - Baba Zula"Barra Barra" (utilizada en la BSO de "Black Hawk derribado" ("Black Hawk Down", Ridley Scott, 2001), "Hey Anta", "Verité", "Ho Cherie Cherie" y "Garab", extraídas de "Made in Medina" (Barclay/Universal, 2000) del músico y compositor argelino Rachid TahaTodas las músicas compuestas e interpretadas por Rachid Taha"Gerekli segler", "Sipa 04", "Zaniye oyun havasi", "Zerzevat adam" y "Özgur ruh (dub), extraídas de "Duble Oryantal" (Doublemoon, 2005) de los turcos Baba Zula (con Mad Professor)Todas las músicas compuestas e interpretadas por Baba ZulaEscuchar audio

Want a quick estimate of how much your business is worth? With our free valuation calculator, answer a few questions about your business, and you'll get an immediate estimate of the value of your business. You might be surprised by how much you can get for it: https://flippa.com/exit -- In this episode of The Exit: Linda Hamilton, a Certified Exit Planning Advisor and longtime CPA, shares practical strategies for business owners preparing for a future exit, emphasizing the importance of readiness, clean financials, and documented systems. Key Takeaways: Exit Planning is About Optionality, Not Just Selling Many business owners avoid thinking about exits too early, but Linda argues that preparing early builds resilience and optionality, not just a path to sell. The Cost of Not Preparing Citing a 30% valuation gap between male and female founders, Linda underscores how lack of preparation—especially around clean books, contracts, and succession—can significantly impact sale outcomes. Readiness vs. Attractiveness Linda encourages using assessments to evaluate both how attractive your business is to a buyer and how ready you are to exit. She shares a story of a founder nearly derailing a deal by not securing key employee agreements. Key Indicators of Exit-Readiness - Critical elements include: Clean, audited financials Signed client/vendor contracts Repeatable and documented systems Cash flow visibility and control over AR/AP Transferability & Systemology As a certified systemologist, Linda highlights the importance of mapping your customer journey and operational systems to ensure the business can run without you—critical for buyer confidence and deal value. Building a Support Team Successful exits rely on coordinated advisors: CPAs, attorneys, brokers, and wealth advisors. A SIPA-certified exit planner often acts as the “quarterback” to align everyone's efforts with the owner's goals. Timing & Purpose Timing an exit is personal. Many owners regret selling too soon because they lack a post-exit purpose. Linda encourages planning for life after the sale as part of the overall exit strategy. Empowering Female Founders Linda advocates for financial fluency and readiness assessments to help women negotiate from a position of strength. Confidence comes from awareness—knowing your numbers, your risks, and your value. Final Advice: Linda wishes she had done her own business readiness assessments earlier in her career, highlighting how early preparation can influence smarter long-term decisions. -- Linda Hamilton is a CPA and CEPA, (Certified Exit Planning Advisor) who is passionate about helping women business owners achieve financial fluency to grow, profit & scale. Linda founded Grow Profit Scale™, a coaching and mastermind program designed to empower women entrepreneurs with financial fluency, profit amplification, and scalable business strategies. In addition to Grow Profit Scale, Linda is also the founder of Linda A. Hamilton CPA LLC, where Linda and her team provide accounting, tax, and strategic financial planning services. With over 35 years as a CPA, CGMA, CEPA, and SYSTEMologist®, she has helped countless business owners develop strong financial systems, improve profitability, and plan for successful exits. Linda on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindahamiltoncpa/ Websites: https://www.growprofitscale.com/ - https://www.lahcpas.com/ -- The Exit—Presented By Flippa: A 30-minute podcast featuring expert entrepreneurs who have been there and done it. The Exit talks to operators who have bought and sold a business. You'll learn how they did it, why they did it, and get exposure to the world of exits, a world occupied by a small few, but accessible to many. To listen to the podcast or get daily listing updates, click on flippa.com/the-exit-podcast/

Diego Genoud (@otro_periodista) charló con Martín Guzmán, ex ministro de Economía, profesor de la Escuela de Asuntos Internacionales y Públicos (SIPA) de la Universidad de Columbia y fundador de Suramericana Visión, sobre Milei, Caputo, el dólar, el FMI y la economía real.

Sipa Resources (ASX: SRI) has started drilling at its new South Australian gold projects. The projects already host known mineralisation and are located close to other well established big deposits. The company is poised for strong news flow as it moves the rigs from one area to the next. Managing Director Andrew Muir, is a highly regarded mining executive with approximately 30 years' experience in the mining and finance industries, originally graduating as a geologist in 1993. Andrew has a strong background in gold exploration and geology, coupled with deep project evaluation and corporate experience. Previously, he held the role of Managing Director at NTM Gold Ltd (ASX: NTM) where he was responsible for significant exploration success prior to the takeover of NTM by Dacian Gold Limited, and most recently at Caprice Resources Limited. Mr Muir is an experienced geologist with time spent across both exploration and mining operations. He was instrumental in the discovery of the multi-million-ounce Wallaby deposit while at the Granny Smith operations, and has previously worked with Great Central Gold Mines, Placer Dome and Goldfields Limited. Along with his successful career in mining and exploration, Mr Muir also has extensive experience in equity capital markets including at Argonaut, where he was an Associate Director with Argonaut's Corporate team. He was also a resource analyst for JP Morgan, Hartleys and PCF Capital. As an analyst at Hartleys, Mr Muir won the 2009 Starmine/AFR Stockpicker of the year award. ---- Produced by Resource Media ---- The Hole Truth: Mining Investment Podcast is a product of Read Corporate. Please note that Read Corporate does not provide investment advice and investors should seek personalised advice before making any investment decisions.    ---- RESOURCES LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/the-hole-truth-podcast YouTube: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI4sZkSfEpPi_u7OrD7lQ-tZHbdy6EhCC&si=iOcGscff7kMSw8c7 Website: https://resourcesrisingstars.com.au/the-hole-truth-podcast/   INSIGHTS FROM THE EPISODE Drilling Begins at Sipa's High-Potential South Australian Gold Projects Sipa Resources has kicked off drilling at Nuckulla Hill, targeting historic gold prospects with significant past intercepts and no exploration in nearly 30 years. Strategic Location Near Tunkillia and Challenger Gold Deposits The projects sit on the same shear zone as Barton Gold's 1.5Moz Tunkillia deposit, offering strong geological continuity and exploration upside. Crown Project Near Kalgoorlie Offers Quick Path to Monetisation Located just 40km from the Lakewood Mill, the Crown Project in WA allows for potential toll treatment or gold sales without needing a major standalone discovery. Experienced Leadership Team Aligned with Shareholders With a board including Stephen Biggins (Core Lithium founder) and MD Andrew Muir, Sipa blends geology, corporate finance, and commercial strategy. Low-Cap Gold Explorer with High Leverage to Discovery With a sub-$10 million market cap and active drilling underway, Sipa offers significant leverage to exploration success in Tier-1 jurisdictions.  

John Quinn is joined by Robert Loigman, partner in Quinn Emanuel's New York office, and Eric Winston, partner in Quinn Emanuel's Los Angeles office.  They discuss the extensive litigation that has followed the 2008 collapse of Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme.  The litigation stems from a liquidation by a court-appointed trustee under the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA).  The primary goal of the liquidation was to recover assets for Madoff's victims.  The litigation has continued for 17 years, so far, because of the number of parties involved and the multitude of proceedings and appeals in both the U.S. and foreign courts.The trustee has pursued clawback claims against “feeder funds” under fraudulent transfer theories, targeting both “net winners” who withdrew more than they invested and “net losers” who withdrew less than they invested.  After the estate recovered $7 billion recovery from one feeder fund, investors began to anticipate higher recoveries than normally occur in SIPA proceedings.  Over time, a secondary market in Madoff claims developed, with distressed asset investors buying claims at steep discounts and profiting when recoveries exceeded expectations.  The Madoff litigation has led to several significant legal developments.  One key issue involved included the safe harbor under the Bankruptcy Code for good faith conduct.  Initially, a judge in the SDNY ruled that to show a lack of good faith, a trustee must show that an investor was willfully blind to the fraud at issue.  In 2021, the Second Circuit ruled that simple inquiry notice is enough, placing a greater burden on investors to investigate irregularities.Another significant legal development was the Second Circuit's ruling that U.S. bankruptcy law could reach transfers between foreign debtors and foreign transferees, expanding the potential reach of clawback efforts.  Finally, the Second Circuit ruled that in a Chapter 15 bankruptcy case, certain U.S. standards would apply to transactions between foreign entities even though the foreign courts with jurisdiction over the entities would apply different standards.The uniquely large and visible fraud in the Madoff litigation case may have led courts to expand legal doctrines in ways that affect bankruptcy and investor litigation more generally.Podcast Link: Law-disrupted.fmHost: John B. Quinn Producer: Alexis HydeMusic and Editing by: Alexander Rossi

In this curated selection from the Happy Space Podcast, I'm bringing back voices that challenge, inspire, and expand our thinking about designing for inclusion and accessibility. These encore episodes highlight conversations that continue to resonate—on neurodiversity, workplace design, and the small shifts that can make a big difference. Whether you're tuning in for the first time or revisiting a favourite, I hope these episodes offer fresh insight into how thoughtful design can help everyone show up and perform at their best.President & CEO of Seramount, Subha Barry tells us about her connections with neurodiversity, her widely recognized Autism Intern program, and gives practical advice on how to advance your DEI efforts in today's corporate world.A trailblazer in diversity, equity, and inclusion, Subha Barry shares a wealth of insights through her work as President and CEO at Seramount. Barry shares her personal and professional journey from India to the United States, and her pioneering initiatives at Merrill Lynch and Freddie Mac, including her widely recognized Autism intern program at Freddie Mac. Key topics include the importance of embedding DEI into business strategies without relying solely on HR, understanding neurodiversity, and practical ways to create inclusive workplaces. She also gives her take on how she thinks leaders should approach DEI and foster better relationships with employees.Subha Barry is a C-suite leader and an advisor who brings a unique perspective on the alignment of corporate culture to talent strategy and business results. As a transformational change agent, she has a proven record of identifying and accelerating new business creation, driving sales, and increasing profitability.Subha is president of Seramount where she drives the firm's vision, strategy, and business development. Subha joined Working Mother Media (WMM) in 2015 and during her tenure she dramatically improved margins, expanded its portfolio through growth in high-value consulting and learning and development, exponentially grew their client roster, and recruited talented executive leaders to amplify subject matter and functional expertise. In 2021, Subha oversaw the brand's transformation from WMM to Seramount, a leading strategic professional services and research firm dedicated to building high-performing, inclusive workplaces. Today, Seramount works with 450+ organizations globally, including half of the Fortune 500, to help our partners navigate today's talent and DEI landscape.Previously, Subha was senior vice president and chief diversity officer at Freddie Mac, where she served on the firm's management committee and led their foundation. Prior to her time at Freddie Mac, Subha spent 20+ years at Merrill Lynch as managing director and their first global head of diversity & inclusion where she built their D&I strategy, infrastructure and execution plans from the ground up. She also created a highly successful Multicultural Business Development Group to focus their wealth management business on diverse and multicultural communities bringing in over $8 billion in new assets and $50+ million in annual revenues in just three years. She began her career at the firm as a financial advisor where she was a top 100 advisor among 16,000 in the firm.Subha is a former adjunct professor at Columbia University's SIPA, and currently serves on the Boards of SHRM Foundation, Rice 360, Rutgers Cancer Center and the Rutgers Institute of Women's Leadership. She is also a Board Advisor at PE-owned Snowden Lane Partners. In the past, Subha has served on a variety of Boards as Board Chair, Head of Nominating & Governance, Finance, and HR and DEI Committees.A native of India, Subha holds a BA from Bombay University and an MBA and MS in Accounting from Rice University. She enjoys golfing, reading poetry and rallying for social change. She has two grown children and lives in...

Visoki predstavnik Christian Schmidt predstavio izvještaj o stanju u Bosni i Hercegovini. SIPA dostavila izvještaj Tužilaštvu BiH o pokušaju hapšenja Dodika, a protiv pripadnika državne policije SIPA-e zbog pokušaja privođenja Dodika krivična prijava u RS-u. Friedrich Merz novi njemački kancelar.

Comenzamos con el anuncio de la gira internacional de Bad Bunny. Después, el turista musical regresa de Elm Street para contar su experiencia con Freddy Krueger reconvertido en jardinero gracias a la ayuda de Raquel del Rosario. A las ocho conocemos la actualidad y una nueva palabra desde Ibiza: 'Sipa't '. Por último, charlamos con el cantante y productor Kiliki, ex miembro del colectivo Chill Mafia, sobre su nuevo proyecto en solitario: 'Iltze 1', siete canciones de amor y guerra. Escuchar audio

Eliot and Eric welcome Edward Fishman, Senior Research Fellow at the Center on Global Energy Policy and Adjunct Professor of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University's SIPA program and author of Chokepoints: American Power in The Age of Economic Warfare (New York: Portfolio/Penguin, 2025). They discuss the American tradition of reaching for economic sanctions as an alternative to kinetic military action or war and how U.S. policymakers have weaponized the role of the dollar in international finance to U.S. advantage as well as export controls like the Foreign Direct Product rule that weaponize U.S. cutting edge technologies. They discuss how these tools, if used inappropriately, can backfire as they arguably did in the early 1800s with the Non-Intercourse Act and the Embargo under Jefferson and Madison as well as the scrap metal and oil embargoes against Imperial Japan in 1940-1941. They consider the record of economic warfare in bringing Iran to the table for the negotiations on the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), as a deterrent to Russian military action against Ukraine in 2014 and 2022 and then as tools of attrition against the Russian war effort, as well as in the ongoing strategic competition with China. Finally, they consider whether we should see sanctions and economic warfare as limited tools that can achieve limited goals as opposed to fundamentally changing the behavior of America's authoritarian adversaries. Shield of the Republic is a Bulwark podcast co-sponsored by the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia. Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare: https://a.co/d/fFkgUq7

Visoki predstavnik u BiH obustavio izdvajanja iz budžeta za SNSD i Ujedinjenu Srpsku. Zbog izbjegavanja eventualnog sukoba, poslan manji broj policajaca za hapšenje Dodika, saopštila je SIPA. Zašto su Podgorica i Priština osudili izjave poglavara Srpske pravoslavne crkve tokom sastanka s Putinom.

What does a change in U.S. presidential administrations have to do with stalled solar farms in Sub-Saharan Africa or wind projects in Southeast Asia? As it turns out, quite a lot. On this episode of Power Perspectives, we explore how U.S. policy shifts are sending ripples through the global financial system—impacting everything from renewable investments in developing countries to grid upgrades on Main Street USA. We're joined by Gautam Jain, Senior Research Scholar at Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy and Adjunct Professor at SIPA, to dig into the high-stakes intersection of climate finance, currency risk, and energy geopolitics. Gautam walks us through why the international green finance system is under pressure as the U.S. government scales back funding commitments under the Trump administration. With global investors growing increasingly wary of geopolitical instability, what's next for the energy transition? And how should utility leaders, policymakers, and financial stakeholders respond? Note: The news in this space is moving fast, so to set context this conversation was recorded on April 4. Key Links: Energy Central Post with Episode Transcript: https://energycentral.com/o/energy-central/real-impacts-trump-20-energy-finance Video version on YouTube: https://youtu.be/I2VqXraG2Ps Gautam Jain on Energy Central: https://energycentral.com/member/profile/gautam-jain Ask a Question to Our Future Guests: Do you have a burning question for the utility executives and energy industry thought leaders that we feature each week on Power Perspectives? Leave us a message here for your chance to be featured in an upcoming episode: www.speakpipe.com/EnergyCentralPodcast

Edward Fishman, Sr. Research Scholar, Center Global Energy Policy andamp; Adj Professor, SIPA, Columbia University

Najnovija kriza u Bosni i Hercegovini nastupila je nakon presude Miloradu Dodiku, predsjedniku Republike Srpske. Nakon toga su uslijedile protumjere koje su shvaćene kao pokušaj državnog udara. Je li trenutačna eskalacija u BiH prolazne naravi kao i mnoge dosadašnje krize u ovoj zemlji? Nenad Kreizer razgovara s reporterom Draganom Maksimovićem i analitičarkom Tanjom Topić o prirodi i dubini krize te pitanjem kako bi se ona mogla okončati. Von Nenad Kreizer.

What if the secret to impactful leadership and thriving relationships lies in embracing honesty, even when it's uncomfortable? On the Uncommon Leader Podcast, we sit down with Todd Holzman, CEO and founder of Holzman Leadership, who shares a deeply personal story from his childhood that shaped his unwavering commitment to truthfulness—a lesson passed down by his father. As we explore Todd's upcoming book, "The Power of Candor," he provides insightful strategies for navigating the "honesty dilemma," where truthfulness and relationship preservation often collide.This episode unpacks the real cost of sidestepping honest conversations, both in personal and professional spheres. Drawing from pivotal moments, including a significant leadership lesson from 1998 and a consultancy experience with Red Bull, we underscore the transformative power of candid dialogue. Todd's stories illuminate how confronting the fear of negative outcomes can lead to enhanced performance, conflict resolution, and averting unnecessary chaos in any arena, whether at home or in the workplace.Diving into the intricacies of communication, we highlight the teachings of social scientist Chris Argyris and dissect the "candor gap" prevalent in healthcare and sales industries. Our conversation touches on emotional intelligence and the SIPA framework for difficult discussions, reinforcing the importance of introspection and self-awareness. Todd also reveals his motivations behind creating an app to democratize high-quality communication training, aiming to equip leaders and individuals with the tools to handle real-world conversations effectively and authentically. Join us as we challenge the norms of communication, advocating for a more honest and meaningful exchange in every interaction.Thanks for listening in to the Uncommon Leader Podcast. Please take just a minute to share this podcast with that someone you know that you thought of when you heard this episode. One of the most valuable things you can do is to rate the podcast and leave a review. You can do that on Apple podcasts, or rate the podcast on Spotify or any other platform you listen. Did you know that many of the things that I discuss on the Uncommon Leader Podcast are subjects that I coach other leaders and organizations ? If you would be interested in having me discuss 1:1 or group coaching with you, or know someone who is looking to move from Underperforming to Uncommon in their business or life, I would love to chat with you. Click this link to set up a FREE CALL to discuss how coaching might benefit you and your team) Until next time, Go and Grow Champions!!Connect with me

Sipa ima izredne moči: plašč nevidnosti, super razpršilec črnila, vendar se nima s kom igrati skrivalnic, razen morda z lačnim morskim psom ... Ima ovalno in ploščato telo ter deset lovk, od katerih sta dve podaljšani. Živi v čudovitem svetu, ki ga poseljujejo ribe, kiti, morski psi, rakovice, morske zvezde, kozice, morske vetrnice in koralni grebeni: v oceanu. Sipa lahko po želji spremeni barvo in tudi svojo teksturo. V trenutku lahko postane pesek, morska alga ali celo skala, brezhibno se zlije z okolico. To ji zelo koristi pri lovu ali pri begu pred plenilci. In to še ni vse: njeno telo oddaja svetlobo, podobno bliskom, ki naelektri njen plen in ga hipnotizira, da ne more pobegniti. Ima tudi skrivno orožje: vrečko s črnilom! Bolje, da je ne prestrašite, sicer lahko v obraz dobite črno barvilo, ki se imenuje sepija. Jesti ali se pustiti pojesti? Ji vse te super moči lahko omogočijo, da se izogne nevarnostim?La seiche : championne du cache cache sous-marin Avtorji literarnih del: Isabelle Collombat (1, 5, 6, 7), Alice Butaud (2,3,10) in Gwénael David (4,8,9)Avtorica prevoda: Anamarija Štukelj CusmaRežiserka: Saška RakefIgralca: Blaž Šef in Anja NovakMojstri zvoka: Urban Gruden (1-10), Sonja Strenar (6,7,9), Matjaž Miklič (10)Urednik oddaj: Alen JelenOdgovorna urednica: Ingrid Kovač BrusLektorice: Tinka Kos, Katarina Minatti, Saša GrčmanFonetičarka: Mateja Juričan Serija Zverinice (v izvirniku Bestioles) je nastala v koprodukciji s francoskim javnim radiem Radio France, ki jo je pripravil v sodelovanju z Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (francoski Narodni prirodoslovni muzej v Parizu). Serijo v slovenščini je podprl tudi Prirodoslovni muzej Slovenije iz Ljubljane.

Emmanuel Macron a porté son choix sur Michel Barnier pour prendre la succession de Gabriel Attal comme Premier ministre. Il devra composer avec une assemblée divisée et hostile. Pour « La Story », le podcast d'actualité des « Echos », Pierrick Fay et ses invités reviennent sur la nomination d'un fin connaisseur du monde politique. Lire aussi : Les dossiers urgents qui l'attendent à Matignon. Retrouver l'essentiel de l'actualité économique grâce à notre offre d'abonnement Access : abonnement.lesechos.fr/lastoryLa Story est un podcast des « Echos » présenté par Pierrick Fay. Cet épisode a été enregistré en septembre 2024. Rédaction en chef : Clémence Lemaistre. Invités : Grégoire Poussielgue (journaliste au service politique des « Echos ») et Etienne Lefebvre (Rédacteur en chef aux «Echos»). Réalisation : Willy Ganne. Chargée de production et d'édition : Michèle Warnet. Musique : Théo Boulenger. Identité graphique : Upian. Photo : Eliot Blondet/pool/SIPA. Sons : Extrait «Borsalino», Extrait «Chants Grégoriens Du Vatican», Extrait les Inconnus, Public Sénat, France 24, INA, LCI, Extrait Carlos «Si j'étais président». Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

In this episode of the ChinaPower Podcast, Dr. Elizabeth Wishnick joins us to discuss recent Sino-Russian activities and what they mean for the overall China-Russia relationship. Dr. Wishnick analyzes the May 2024 Xi-Putin meeting in Beijing, noting that the joint statement the two countries released had significant areas of continuity and some areas of change compared to 2023. She then analyzes the meeting between the two leaders at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit and the nearly half a dozen military exercises the two countries engaged in in July and August 2024. Dr. Wishnick emphasizes that the recent surge of China-Russia military exercises are meant to signal China-Russia political and strategic coordination, with some scheduled in advance as part of their normal annual exercise plans and others scheduled in response to U.S. activities. Finally, Dr. Wishnick shares her predictions for developments within Sino-Russian relations in the coming months.  Dr. Elizabeth Wishnick is a Senior Research Scientist in the China and Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Division at CNA. She was a Professor of Political Science at Montclair State University from 2005-2024 and the Coordinator of MSU's Asian Studies Undergraduate Minor from 2010-2019. Since 2002, she has been a research scholar at Columbia University's Weatherhead East Asian Institute. She previously taught undergraduate and graduate courses in international relations, Chinese politics, and Chinese foreign policy at Barnard College, Columbia College, and SIPA. Dr. Wishnick has dual regional expertise on China and Russia and is an expert on Chinese foreign policy, Sino-Russian relations, Northeast Asian and Central Asian security, and Arctic geopolitics.  She received a PhD in Political Science from Columbia University, an MA in Russian and East European Studies from Yale University, and a BA from Barnard College. She speaks Mandarin, Russian, and French.

Ray Suarez sits down with Dr. Timothy Naftali, senior research scholar at Columbia University's SIPA, to examine Biden's foreign policy legacy… and how country's around the world are preparing for a new US President in 2025. Guest:   Dr. Timothy Naftali, senior research scholar at Columbia University's SIPA Host:  Ray Suarez If you appreciate this episode and want to support the work we do, please consider making a donation to Commonwealth Club World Affairs. We cannot do this work without your help. Thank you.

President & CEO of Seramount, Subha Barry tells us about her connections with neurodiversity, her widely recognized Autism Intern program, and gives practical advice on how to advance your DEI efforts in today's corporate world.A trailblazer in diversity, equity, and inclusion, Subha Barry shares a wealth of insights through her work as President and CEO at Seramount. Barry shares her personal and professional journey from India to the United States, and her pioneering initiatives at Merrill Lynch and Freddie Mac, including her widely recognized Autism intern program at Freddie Mac. Key topics include the importance of embedding DEI into business strategies without relying solely on HR, understanding neurodiversity, and practical ways to create inclusive workplaces. She also gives her take on how she thinks leaders should approach DEI and foster better relationships with employees.Subha Barry is a C-suite leader and an advisor who brings a unique perspective on the alignment of corporate culture to talent strategy and business results. As a transformational change agent, she has a proven record of identifying and accelerating new business creation, driving sales, and increasing profitability.Subha is president of Seramount where she drives the firm's vision, strategy, and business development. Subha joined Working Mother Media (WMM) in 2015 and during her tenure she dramatically improved margins, expanded its portfolio through growth in high-value consulting and learning and development, exponentially grew their client roster, and recruited talented executive leaders to amplify subject matter and functional expertise. In 2021, Subha oversaw the brand's transformation from WMM to Seramount, a leading strategic professional services and research firm dedicated to building high-performing, inclusive workplaces. Today, Seramount works with 450+ organizations globally, including half of the Fortune 500, to help our partners navigate today's talent and DEI landscape.Previously, Subha was senior vice president and chief diversity officer at Freddie Mac, where she served on the firm's management committee and led their foundation. Prior to her time at Freddie Mac, Subha spent 20+ years at Merrill Lynch as managing director and their first global head of diversity & inclusion where she built their D&I strategy, infrastructure and execution plans from the ground up. She also created a highly successful Multicultural Business Development Group to focus their wealth management business on diverse and multicultural communities bringing in over $8 billion in new assets and $50+ million in annual revenues in just three years. She began her career at the firm as a financial advisor where she was a top 100 advisor among 16,000 in the firm.Subha is a former adjunct professor at Columbia University's SIPA, and currently serves on the Boards of SHRM Foundation, Rice 360, Rutgers Cancer Center and the Rutgers Institute of Women's Leadership. She is also a Board Advisor at PE-owned Snowden Lane Partners. In the past, Subha has served on a variety of Boards as Board Chair, Head of Nominating & Governance, Finance, and HR and DEI Committees.A native of India, Subha holds a BA from Bombay University and an MBA and MS in Accounting from Rice University. She enjoys golfing, reading poetry and rallying for social change. She has two grown children and lives in Naples, Florida and New Hope, PA with her husband.CHAPTERS04:00 Subha's story and journey in DEI08:00 Connecting DEI to the business09:40 Seramount's initiatives and the focus on neurodiversity13:00 Multicultural initiatives at Merrill Lynch and relying on HR for talent issues16:38 Diverse culture shift in Canada19:00 Subha's experience with neurodiversity and personal connection with autism21:40 Freddie Mac's Autism Internship Program30:50 Positive examples of DEI...

Guest: Jason Healey, Senior Research Scholar, Cyber Conflict Studies, SIPA at Columbia University [@Columbia]On LinkedIn | https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonhealey/At BlackHat: https://www.blackhat.com/us-24/briefings/schedule/speakers.html#jason-healey-31682____________________________Hosts: Sean Martin, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine [@ITSPmagazine] and Host of Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast [@RedefiningCyber]On ITSPmagazine | https://www.itspmagazine.com/sean-martinMarco Ciappelli, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine [@ITSPmagazine] and Host of Redefining Society PodcastOn ITSPmagazine | https://www.itspmagazine.com/itspmagazine-podcast-radio-hosts/marco-ciappelli____________________________Episode NotesOpening Remarks:Sean Martin and Marco Ciappelli set the stage with their signature banter, creating an inviting atmosphere for a deep dive into cybersecurity. Marco introduces a philosophical question about measuring success and improvement in the field, leading seamlessly into their conversation with Jason Healey.Meet the Expert:Sean introduces Jason Healey, a senior research scholar at Columbia University and a former military cybersecurity leader with extensive experience, including roles at the Pentagon and the White House. Jason shares his excitement for Black Hat 2024 and the anniversary celebrations of ITSPmagazine, expressing anticipation for the discussions ahead.The Role of Defense in Cybersecurity:Jason previews his journey from military service to academia, posing the critical question, “Is defense winning?” He provides a historical perspective, noting that cybersecurity challenges have been present for decades. Despite significant investments and efforts, attackers often seem to maintain an edge. This preview sets the stage for a deeper exploration of how to measure success in defense, which he plans to address in detail at the conference.Shifting the Balance:Jason highlights the need for a comprehensive framework to evaluate the effectiveness of defense mechanisms. He introduces the concept of metrics like “mean time to detect,” suggesting that these can help gauge progress over time. Jason plans to discuss the importance of understanding system-wide dynamics at Black Hat, emphasizing that cybersecurity is about continual improvement rather than quick fixes.Economic Costs and Broader Impacts:Sean shifts the discussion to the economic aspects of cybersecurity, a topic Jason is set to explore further at the event. Jason notes that while financial implications are substantial, other indicators, such as the frequency of states declaring emergencies due to cyber incidents, provide a broader view of the impact. He underscores the need to address disparities in cybersecurity protection, pointing out that not everyone has access to the same level of defense capabilities.Community and Collaboration:Marco and Jason discuss the importance of community involvement in improving cybersecurity. Jason stresses the value of shared metrics and continuous data analysis, calling for collective efforts to build a robust defense against evolving threats. This theme of collaboration will be a key focus in his upcoming session.Looking Forward:As they wrap up, Sean and Marco express their anticipation for Jason's session at Black Hat 2024. They encourage the audience to join in, engage with the topics discussed, and contribute to the ongoing conversation on cybersecurity.Conclusion:Sean concludes by thanking Jason for his insights and highlighting the importance of the upcoming Black Hat sessions. He invites listeners to follow ITSPmagazine's coverage for more expert discussions and insights into the field of cybersecurity.For more insightful sessions and expert talks on cybersecurity, make sure to follow ITSPmagazine's Black Hat coverage. Stay safe and stay informed!Be sure to follow our Coverage Journey and subscribe to our podcasts!____________________________This Episode's SponsorsLevelBlue: https://itspm.ag/levelblue266f6cCoro: https://itspm.ag/coronet-30deSquareX: https://itspm.ag/sqrx-l91____________________________Follow our Black Hat USA  2024 coverage: https://www.itspmagazine.com/black-hat-usa-2024-hacker-summer-camp-2024-event-coverage-in-las-vegasOn YouTube:

Guest: Jason Healey, Senior Research Scholar, Cyber Conflict Studies, SIPA at Columbia University [@Columbia]On LinkedIn | https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonhealey/At BlackHat: https://www.blackhat.com/us-24/briefings/schedule/speakers.html#jason-healey-31682____________________________Hosts: Sean Martin, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine [@ITSPmagazine] and Host of Redefining CyberSecurity Podcast [@RedefiningCyber]On ITSPmagazine | https://www.itspmagazine.com/sean-martinMarco Ciappelli, Co-Founder at ITSPmagazine [@ITSPmagazine] and Host of Redefining Society PodcastOn ITSPmagazine | https://www.itspmagazine.com/itspmagazine-podcast-radio-hosts/marco-ciappelli____________________________Episode NotesOpening Remarks:Sean Martin and Marco Ciappelli set the stage with their signature banter, creating an inviting atmosphere for a deep dive into cybersecurity. Marco introduces a philosophical question about measuring success and improvement in the field, leading seamlessly into their conversation with Jason Healey.Meet the Expert:Sean introduces Jason Healey, a senior research scholar at Columbia University and a former military cybersecurity leader with extensive experience, including roles at the Pentagon and the White House. Jason shares his excitement for Black Hat 2024 and the anniversary celebrations of ITSPmagazine, expressing anticipation for the discussions ahead.The Role of Defense in Cybersecurity:Jason previews his journey from military service to academia, posing the critical question, “Is defense winning?” He provides a historical perspective, noting that cybersecurity challenges have been present for decades. Despite significant investments and efforts, attackers often seem to maintain an edge. This preview sets the stage for a deeper exploration of how to measure success in defense, which he plans to address in detail at the conference.Shifting the Balance:Jason highlights the need for a comprehensive framework to evaluate the effectiveness of defense mechanisms. He introduces the concept of metrics like “mean time to detect,” suggesting that these can help gauge progress over time. Jason plans to discuss the importance of understanding system-wide dynamics at Black Hat, emphasizing that cybersecurity is about continual improvement rather than quick fixes.Economic Costs and Broader Impacts:Sean shifts the discussion to the economic aspects of cybersecurity, a topic Jason is set to explore further at the event. Jason notes that while financial implications are substantial, other indicators, such as the frequency of states declaring emergencies due to cyber incidents, provide a broader view of the impact. He underscores the need to address disparities in cybersecurity protection, pointing out that not everyone has access to the same level of defense capabilities.Community and Collaboration:Marco and Jason discuss the importance of community involvement in improving cybersecurity. Jason stresses the value of shared metrics and continuous data analysis, calling for collective efforts to build a robust defense against evolving threats. This theme of collaboration will be a key focus in his upcoming session.Looking Forward:As they wrap up, Sean and Marco express their anticipation for Jason's session at Black Hat 2024. They encourage the audience to join in, engage with the topics discussed, and contribute to the ongoing conversation on cybersecurity.Conclusion:Sean concludes by thanking Jason for his insights and highlighting the importance of the upcoming Black Hat sessions. He invites listeners to follow ITSPmagazine's coverage for more expert discussions and insights into the field of cybersecurity.For more insightful sessions and expert talks on cybersecurity, make sure to follow ITSPmagazine's Black Hat coverage. Stay safe and stay informed!Be sure to follow our Coverage Journey and subscribe to our podcasts!____________________________This Episode's SponsorsLevelBlue: https://itspm.ag/levelblue266f6cCoro: https://itspm.ag/coronet-30deSquareX: https://itspm.ag/sqrx-l91____________________________Follow our Black Hat USA  2024 coverage: https://www.itspmagazine.com/black-hat-usa-2024-hacker-summer-camp-2024-event-coverage-in-las-vegasOn YouTube:

Crise au sommet de LR entre Eric Ciotti et les poids lourds de la droite républicaine sur l'opportunité de s'allier au Rassemblement national. Pour « La Story », le podcast d'actualité des « Echos », Pierrick Fay et ses invités s'interrogent sur les conséquences de cette crise chez LR à trois semaines des législatives… Episode 2/2.La Story est un podcast des « Echos » présenté par Pierrick Fay. Cet épisode a été enregistré en juin 2024. Rédaction en chef : Clémence Lemaistre. Invité : Jacques Paugam et Ulysse Legavre-Jérôme (journalistes au service politique des Echos) et Cécile Cornudet (Editorialiste aux Echos). Réalisation : Willy Ganne. Chargée de production et d'édition : Michèle Warnet. Musique : Théo Boulenger. Identité graphique : Upian. Photo : Eric TSCHAEN-pool/SIPA. Sons : Ep2 : BFM.TV, Extrait de «Fantasia», France Info, Générique «Maxitête», Extrait «y a-t-il un pilote dans l'avion», Twitter de Eric Ciotti. Retrouvez l'essentiel de l'actualité économique grâce à notre offre d'abonnement Access : abonnement.lesechos.fr/lastory Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Today we bring you our live panel discussion hosted by Anna Bower of Lawfare and featuring myself, our SIPA expert, Brian Greer, and of course, Andy McCabe. In this show, we'll be going over the latest trial postponement from Judge Aileen Cannon, as well as an overview of where we are now, where we started, and how we got here.Plus, audience questions!   Thank youAnna Bowerhttps://twitter.com/AnnaBowerFilm Vision Mediahttps://www.filmvm.com/Michael V. Hayden Center for Intelligence, Policy, and international Security at George Mason University's Schar School of Policy and Governmenthttps://haydencenter.gmu.edu/Brian Greerhttps://twitter.com/secretsandlaws Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ Brian Greer's Quick Guide to CIPAhttps://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to know:Rule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

Manifestations à Harvard et Columbia, présidents d'université sur la sellette, donateurs en colère, la guerre à Gaza sème aussi le trouble dans les temples de l'éducation aux Etats-Unis. Pour « La Story », le podcast d'actualité des « Echos », Pierrick Fay et Solveig Godeluck évoquent la crise des écoles des élites américaines.A lire dans les Echos Week End, l'enquête de Solveig : Harvard, la chute d'un empire américainLa Story est un podcast des « Echos » présenté par Pierrick Fay. Cet épisode a été enregistré en avril 2024. Rédaction en chef : Clémence Lemaistre. Invitée : Solveig Godeluck (correspondante des « Echos » à New York). Réalisation : Willy Ganne. Chargée de production et d'édition : Michèle Warnet. Musique : Théo Boulenger. Identité graphique : Upian. Photo : Jimin Kim. SOPA images/SIPA. Sons : Al Jazeera English, Fox, Green Day, Talia Jane, CBS Boston, Tom Lehrer : Fight Fiercely, Harvard (1953), Didier Bourdon « on peut plus rien dire ».Retrouver l'essentiel de l'actualité économique grâce à notre offre d'abonnement Access : abonnement.lesechos.fr/lastoryComment écouter et s'abonner à La Story ?Retrouvez tous les épisodes de La Story sur lesechos.frRetrouvez-nous aussi gratuitement sur Apple Podcast, Spotify, Amazon Music, Deezer, Google podcast, Castbox, autres applications (RSS). Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

In this conversation, Von interviews Justin, a breakdancer, registered nurse, and founder of Hi-Fi Kitchen. They discuss their past experiences in the open mic and music scene, as well as Justin's journey into breakdancing and nursing. They also touch on Von's fear of needles, their love for food, and the inspiration behind starting Hi-Fi Kitchen. Justin shares his journey from nursing to starting his own restaurant, Hi-Fi Kitchen, in Historic Filipinotown. He talks about his passion for food and creativity, and how he decided to take a leap and pursue his dream. Justin also discusses the LA spin on Filipino classics that Hi-Fi Kitchen offers, and the importance of celebrating the Filipino culture through food. He mentions two upcoming events: an art exhibit highlighting the Filipino Angelino diaspora and Historic Illipinos, an event celebrating the impact of Filipinos in Hip-Hop.Chapters(00:00) Introduction and Reconnecting(07:24) Balancing Nursing and Music(15:08) The Birth of Hi-Fi Kitchen(38:45) Upcoming Events: Art Exhibit and Historic IllipinosBuy Historic Illipino Tickets Here:https://www.eventbrite.com/e/historic-illipinos-iv-moving-the-needle-tickets-876812167797?aff=oddtdtcreator&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0BMQABpjE25BL5z2FjbdRPyPTLegDYBCZaL_lne-9jjp3LbpCgBqxYqN82zeN_4g_aem_AVVVLaaTbtx0NkxNJJhBRcMpN_2A9c8XXqlU3TEZbNceDGlF9-nmWnTwBbvTxx9R6hYHi-Fi Kitchen IG:https://www.instagram.com/hifikitchen/Historic Illipinos IG:https://www.instagram.com/historicillipinos?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==Follow Me on Social Media:https://www.instagram.com/thevoncastshow/https://www.instagram.com/shibavon/ https://www.tiktok.com/@wowshibavon

Ever wondered how a technology giant navigates the fluid and unpredictable terrain of the tech industry? Or how they prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in their global strategy? Join us as we have an insightful conversation with Maurice Wiggins, currently Head of Global Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Google. He opens up about his experience in human resources, strategic development, and the unique tasks he undertakes. He also shares his role in crisis management and the ways he aligns people strategy with business strategy.This episode is much more than a career story, it dives into Maurice's personal journey, his college years, and his decision to attend an HBCU (Historically Black Colleges and Universities). His experiences have shaped his career trajectory and are an integral part of his role as a transformational leader. We also delve into his bold career moves and academic pursuits that took him from Florida to New York, through various cities, overcoming challenges with determination and resilience. From achieving his dream of attending Columbia University to transitioning from a consulting role to a tech career, Maurice's journey is one of constant learning and adaptability. Lastly, we tackle the often controversial topic of compensation in the tech industry. We explore the many factors that influence salary and the importance of continuous learning and skill development. Maurice shares his favorite resources for personal and professional growth, offering valuable advice for navigating the tech industry and securing fair compensation. This episode is an enlightening and inspirational conversation that offers guidance to all - those already in tech, and those considering making the leap. Tune in for a wealth of insights from someone living and breathing the tech industry every day.

Le célèbre fabricant allemand de sandales a raté son introduction à Wall Street, mais pas à Hollywood. Dans « La Story », le podcast d'actualité des « Echos », Pierrick Fay et ses invités expliquent comment Birkenstock compte bien séduire aussi bien les clients que la Bourse.La Story est un podcast des « Echos » présenté par Pierrick Fay. Cet épisode a été enregistré en octobre 2023. Rédaction en chef : Clémence Lemaistre. Invités : Virginie Jacoberger-Lavoué (Journaliste « aux Echos ») et Emmanuel Grasland (Correspondant des « Echos » à Berlin). Réalisation : Willy Ganne. Musique : Théo Boulenger. Identité graphique : Upian. Photo : Michael Probst/Ap. SIPA. Sons : « OSS 117 – Rio ne répond plus », Metodo.fr, « Barbie » de Greta Gerwig, 2023 , Bloomberg. TV, « Les Reines du dressing », « La grosse valse » de Louis de Funes et Robert Dhéry, 1962, « La classe américaine ». Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

As a shaman, Sipa Melo is the beating heart of tribal faith and culture in a remote corner of north-east India, tucked in the shadow of the Himalayan Mountains. He's a healer, a story-teller and a protector of the natural world. Antonia Bolingbroke-Kent joins Sipa for a week of ritual, performing ceremonies to mark deaths and births and maintaining taboos that help preserve this mountainous region's indigenous culture and its rich wildlife. She hears about his determined efforts to encourage a new generation of trainee shamans and his worries about the changing values of the region as roads and hydro-electric dams end its isolation from the booming cities to the south.

Gulf Arab states are looking to build economic bridges with countries in the Middle East and Africa.     Last year, the International Monetary Fund announced that major energy producers – like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates – are expected to collect $1.3 trillion in profits from high oil prices over the next four years. These profits are expected to fund Gulf Arab states' investments abroad.  At home, they aim to diversify their economies and invest in the energy transition although they anticipate oil demand to rise in the next few years.  What does the move toward economic cooperation in the Middle East and Africa mean for the global world order? What does it mean for relationships with the U.S. and China? And to what extent will the energy transition be a focus for investment?    This week, host Bill Loveless talks with Karen Young about her book “The Economic Statecraft of the Gulf Arab States” which came out earlier this year. They discuss how the rise of authoritarian or state capitalism in the Middle East, the Horn of Africa, and West Asia could impact the global energy transition.  Karen is an author and political economist focusing on the Gulf, the broader Middle East and North Africa region, and the intersection of energy, finance, and security. She was a senior fellow and founding director of the Program on Economics and Energy at the Middle East Institute. She is currently a senior research scholar at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, SIPA.

Ils sont en nombre dans les cortèges contre le projet de réforme des retraites. Les enseignants – à l'image du personnel de santé – affichent de plus en plus leur mal-être. Et ce n'est pas qu'une question de salaire. Pour « La Story », le podcast d'actualité des « Echos », Pierrick Fay et ses invités s'interrogent sur le malaise des enseignants.La Story est un podcast des « Echos » présenté par Pierrick Fay. Cet épisode a été enregistré en mars 2023. Rédaction en chef : Clémence Lemaistre. Invités : Marie Christine Corbier (journaliste éducation aux «Echos») et Eric Charbonnier (expert éducation à l'OCDE). Réalisation : Nicolas Jean. Chargée de production et d'édition : Michèle Warnet. Musique : Théo Boulenger. Identité graphique : Upian. Photo : Chang martin Sipa. Sons : L'Humanité, «Profs» de Pierre-Martin Laval (2013), Coluche, Star Academy 4 - «Adieu Monsieur Le Professeur», «Jamais absent ce prof» de Mams Life TV, Grégoire - «Profs», Bref je suis un prof (Prof passionné), Xabab TV, «Scènes de ménage». Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

ODYSSEY Media Group Director of Audience Engagement Aza Khan reads her winning SIPA presidential speech.

In episode 18 of Before the Come Up, we sit down with Samantha Shapses. She is a student affairs professional committed to engaging students, faculty, and administrators in the practice of exploring diversity, equity, and inclusion within all aspects of higher education. Currently, Dr. Shapses serves as Associate Dean and Dean of Student Affairs, Full-Time MBA Programs at Columbia Business School, where she draws upon 20 years of professional experience working in the field of higher education as a student affairs professional. Dr. Shapses has also served as an Adjunct Assistant Professor at SIPA, New York University, and Teacher's College, Columbia University where she teaches courses on social justice education and higher education administration. Dr. Shapses has presented at numerous national conferences on this topic and has published articles featured in the Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, Education and Whiteness, and the Journal of South African Higher Education. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/beforethecomeup/message

This episode covers:A study revealing a 2-minute hack to improve health after mealsA tasty drink that improves health as you sipA 4-letter acronym that will help you build a healthy meal every timeLinks I mentioned during this episode:Join Revitalize: https://www.thelyonsshare.org/revitalizeHealthy Meal Components blog post: https://www.thelyonsshare.org/?p=23548Study on walking after meals: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-022-01649-4FREE Blood Sugar Masterclass: https://mailchi.mp/thelyonsshare/sosliveclassGood Idea drink: https://amzn.to/3xl28Ic Protein blog post: https://www.thelyonsshare.org/2021/04/12/how-much-protein-do-you-need-and-the-benefits-of-protein/Healthy fat blog post: https://www.thelyonsshare.org/2021/05/03/is-fat-bad-benefits-of-healthy-fat-how-much-you-should-eat-daily/How to take action after listening to this episode:Have your next meal be a VVFP meal!

This episode highlights the hilarious and groundbreaking film "Easter Sunday," which opens in theaters on August 5th. Filipino American comedian Jo Koy, actress Lydia Gaston, and SIPA Director of Operations Hannah-Kalea Enqriquez share why this new comedy will truly be a love letter to their community.