Podcasts about Yalta

Who created the United Nations? How did The Big Three divide Germany between themselves? Why did Poland see the Yalta conference as “The Great Betrayal”? Anita and William explore the origins of the United Nations and how the compromises made by world leaders in 1945 continue to affect geopolitics today… Love History? Get our exclusive History Today deal! You can get started with a 3-month trial for only £5 at https://historytoday.com/empire  ----------------- Empire Club: Become a member of the Empire Club to receive early access to miniseries, ad-free listening, early access to live show tickets, bonus episodes, book discounts, our exclusive newsletter, and access to our members' chatroom on Discord! Head to empirepoduk.com to sign up. For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com.  ----------------- Email: empire@goalhanger.com Instagram: @empirepoduk  Blue Sky: @empirepoduk  X: @empirepoduk Assistant Producer: Becki Hills Producer: Anouska Lewis Senior Producer: Callum Hill Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Where did The Big Three stay as they carved up the post-war world map, and why were their rooms full of bedbugs? Why did FDR refuse to allow the press to photograph him arriving at Yalta? What role did Churchill and FDR's daughters play in the political negotiations? William and Anita discuss the first day of the Yalta conference and the unlikely alliances that begin to form as The Big Three redesign Europe… Love History? Get our exclusive History Today deal! You can get started with a 3-month trial for only £5 at https://historytoday.com/empire  ----------------- Empire Club: Become a member of the Empire Club to receive early access to miniseries, ad-free listening, early access to live show tickets, bonus episodes, book discounts, our exclusive newsletter, and access to our members' chatroom on Discord! Head to empirepoduk.com to sign up. For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com.  ----------------- Email: empire@goalhanger.com Instagram: @empirepoduk  Blue Sky: @empirepoduk  X: @empirepoduk Assistant Producer: Becki Hills Producer: Anouska Lewis Senior Producer: Callum Hill Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

How did FDR become the mediator between Stalin and Churchill at the 1945 conference? Why did Churchill call Yalta the “Hades Riviera”? What was Mussolini's rude nickname for FDR? Anita and William dive into the backstories of Churchill and FDR ahead of their arrival in Yalta, and explore the meetings that led up to the eight days that changed the world, including Churchill's “naughty document” that signed away Eastern Europe to the Soviets... Love History? Get our exclusive History Today deal! You can get started with a 3-month trial for only £5 at https://historytoday.com/empire  ----------------- Empire Club: Become a member of the Empire Club to receive early access to miniseries, ad-free listening, early access to live show tickets, bonus episodes, book discounts, our exclusive newsletter, and access to our members' chatroom on Discord! Head to empirepoduk.com to sign up. For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com.  ----------------- Email: empire@goalhanger.com Instagram: @empirepoduk  Blue Sky: @empirepoduk  X: @empirepoduk Assistant Producer: Becki Hills Producer: Anouska Lewis Senior Producer: Callum Hill Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Une saga palpitante sur les derniers mois de la Seconde Guerre mondiale.Juillet 1944. Tandis qu'à l'Est, l'Armée rouge casse définitivement les reins de la Wehrmacht (opération " Bagration") et qu'à l'Ouest, Américains et Britanniques qui piétinaient depuis le Débarquement, percent enfin les défenses allemandes (opération " Cobra"), les chefs alliés sont optimistes : la guerre en Europe sera finie à Noël. Tous se trompent. Elle durera dix mois encore. Les plus coûteux en vies humaines de tout le conflit. Comment l'Allemagne, dont les forces vives – hommes, matériels, infrastructures industrielles, ressources énergétiques – ont été saignées à blanc, a-t-elle pu tenir aussi longtemps ? Pourquoi Hitler, au contraire de Mussolini ou du dictateur roumain Antonescu, n'a-t-il pas été renversé ? Comment l'Union soviétique, dont plus de 20 millions de citoyens ont été exterminés en trois ans, est-elle parvenue, en quelques mois, à recouvrer le terrain perdu et à planter le drapeau rouge au sommet du Reichstag ? Pourquoi les États-Unis passent-ils pour le pays ayant le plus contribué à la victoire sur l'Allemagne alors que sur les 48 millions de morts provoqués par la guerre en Europe, 73 % sont des Russes (16 millions de civils et 9 millions de combattants soit 15 % de la population de l'URSS) et 0,3% seulement des Américains (140 000 morts) ? Même illusion d'optique s'agissant des accords de Yalta (février 1945) et du prétendu " partage du monde " qui en a résulté. Sait-on que ce n'est pas Roosevelt – trop rapidement taxé de complaisance avec Staline – qui a entériné les visées territoriales soviétiques sur l'Europe centrale, mais le très anticommuniste Churchill, cinq mois plus tôt à Moscou, pour préserver la sphère d'influence britannique sur la Grèce et la Méditerranée orientale ? Après tant d'ouvrages écrits sur la Seconde Guerre mondiale, raconter l'histoire de son achèvement européen était nécessaire pour tordre le cou à beaucoup d'idées reçues. C'est l'objet de ce livre dont l'originalité repose sur les angles morts qu'il a choisi d'éclairer, et la force au rare talent d'écriture de son auteur.L'auteur Eric Branca est notre invité en studioDistribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

How did one peace conference in Yalta in 1945 completely transform the world in just eight days? What was Joseph Stalin's backstory before becoming the Soviet leader? What is the relevance of the Yalta conference to global politics today? In a brand new series, Anita and William explore how Winston Churchill, Joseph Stalin and Franklin D. Roosevelt drew new borders and created new empire-like spheres of influence towards the end of The Second World War. With Europe left in a state of devastation, how did these three men reshape the world over the course of 8 days?  Love History? Get our exclusive History Today deal! You can get started with a 3-month trial for only £5 at https://historytoday.com/empire  ----------------- Empire Club: Become a member of the Empire Club to receive early access to miniseries, ad-free listening, early access to live show tickets, bonus episodes, book discounts, our exclusive newsletter, and access to our members' chatroom on Discord! Head to empirepoduk.com to sign up. For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com.  ----------------- Email: empire@goalhanger.com Instagram: @empirepoduk  Blue Sky: @empirepoduk  X: @empirepoduk Assistant Producer: Becki Hills Producer: Anouska Lewis Senior Producer: Callum Hill Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

AI: HUAWEI THE PIRATE. BRANDON WEICHERT. 1945 YALTA

How are women really portrayed in the Talmud—and what happens when we look beyond the surface? In this episode, we speak with Gila Fine about her groundbreaking book, The Madwoman in the Rabbi's Attic, where she takes us deep into the stories of the six named heroines of the Talmud: Yalta the shrew, Homa the femme fatale, Marta the prima donna, Heruta the madonna/whore, Beruria the overreachrix, and Ima Shalom the angel in the house. As their labels suggest, each woman seems to embody an antifeminist stereotype—but Gila shows that with a careful, layered reading, there's a lot more going on. She shares her intuitive and compelling methodology of reading each story twice: once for its plain meaning, and again to uncover the deeper, often unexpected truth. We dive into the story of Yalta—the so-called shrew—where Gila's approach cracks open new ways of thinking, and once you hear it, you'll never look at aggadah the same way again.___*This episode is dedicated to the refua shelema of our dear friend Yaakov ben Haya Sarah Malakh and to the neshama of Meir ben Moshe a'h — Abdolrahim Ilian, the late father of our dear friend, Rod Ilian. ___• Bio: How are women really portrayed in the Talmud—and what happens when we look beyond the surface? In this episode, we speak with Gila Fine, winner of the National Jewish Book Award and the Rabbi Sacks Book Prize, about her groundbreaking book, The Madwoman in the Rabbi's Attic, where she takes us deep into the stories of the six named heroines of the Talmud: Yalta the shrew, Homa the femme fatale, Marta the prima donna, Heruta the madonna/wh*re, Beruria the overreachrix, and Ima Shalom the angel in the house. As their labels suggest, each woman seems to embody an antifeminist stereotype—but Gila shows that with a careful, layered reading, there's a lot more going on. She shares her intuitive and compelling methodology of reading each story twice: once for its plain meaning, and again to uncover the deeper, often unexpected truth. We dive into the story of Yalta—the so-called shrew—where Gila's approach cracks open new ways of thinking, and once you hear it, you'll never look at aggadah the same way again.___• Get her book here: https://korenpub.com/products/the-madwoman-in-the-rabbis-attic?handle=kgsd0___• Welcome to JUDAISM DEMYSTIFIED: A PODCAST FOR THE PERPLEXED | Co-hosted by Benjy & Benzi | Thank you to...Super Patron: Jordan Karmily, Platinum Patron: Craig Gordon, Rod Ilian, Gold Patrons: Dovidchai Abramchayev, Lazer Cohen, Travis Krueger, Vasili Volkoff, Vasya, Silver Patrons: Ellen Fleischer, Daniel Maksumov, Rabbi Pinny Rosenthal, Fred & Antonio, Jeffrey Wasserman, and Jacob Winston! Please SUBSCRIBE to this YouTube Channel and hit the BELL so you can get alerted whenever new clips get posted, thank you for your support!

This week, Joe comes awfully close to asking a "what if" question (and getting a shoe thrown at him)! Join us as we discuss historical perspectives on the Yalta Conference at the end of World War Two and what the West could have done differently in confronting the growing Soviet threat in Eastern Europe.

Cette émission est réalisée en partenariat avec le film "Voyage avec mon père" (sortie le 9 avril 2025), réalisé par Julia von Heinz avec Lena Dunham, Stephen Fry, nous a donné envie de partir avec vous à la découverte de la Pologne de 1930 à 1995 !"Petit" synopsis : le film "Voyage avec mon père" retrace l'histoire d'une journaliste new-yorkaise, en 1991 après la chute du mur de Berlin, qui propose à son père, rescapé des camps, un voyage en Pologne, son pays d'origine. Elle cherche à comprendre l'histoire de sa famille, tandis que lui n'a aucune envie de déterrer le passé. Un voyage qui s'annonce compliqué !Toutes les informations sur le film : https://voyage-avec-mon-pere.lefilm.co/ et pour choisir votre séance : https://voyage-avec-mon-pere.lefilm.co/showtimes/?starts_at=1744329600000.Pologne 1930 - 1995Dans les années 1930, la Pologne est une république autoritaire dirigée par le maréchal Józef Piłsudski jusqu'à sa mort en 1935. Son régime a mis en place une forte centralisation du pouvoir, limitant les partis d'opposition, tout en cherchant à maintenir une position indépendante entre l'Allemagne nazie et l'Union soviétique. Mais en 1939, la situation bascule brutalement : le 1er septembre, l'Allemagne nazie envahit la Pologne, suivie le 17 septembre par l'invasion soviétique depuis l'est, conformément au pacte germano-soviétique. Le pays est alors démembré et occupé par les deux puissances.Pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, la Pologne subit des pertes humaines et matérielles immenses. Les nazis y organisent l'extermination des Juifs, notamment à Auschwitz, Treblinka et Majdanek, faisant de la Pologne le principal théâtre de la Shoah. Varsovie est détruite à plus de 80 %, notamment après l'insurrection de 1944. Malgré cela, une résistance intérieure intense se développe, tant contre les nazis que contre les Soviétiques. L'Armée de l'Intérieur (Armia Krajowa), fidèle au gouvernement polonais en exil à Londres, tente de libérer le pays avant l'arrivée de l'Armée rouge.À la fin de la guerre, en 1945, l'Union soviétique impose un régime communiste à la Pologne, malgré les engagements de Yalta. La République populaire de Pologne est proclamée, avec un gouvernement dominé par les communistes, sous le contrôle étroit de Moscou. Les décennies suivantes sont marquées par des tensions sociales, des pénuries économiques et une répression politique. En 1956, une première révolte éclate à Poznań, suivie d'un assouplissement temporaire sous Władysław Gomułka.Les années 1970 voient une modernisation économique financée par des emprunts occidentaux, sous la direction d'Edward Gierek, mais cette politique mène à une grave crise financière à la fin de la décennie. En 1980, une série de grèves dans les chantiers navals de Gdańsk donne naissance au syndicat indépendant Solidarność, dirigé par Lech Wałęsa. Ce mouvement de masse devient une force politique majeure, menaçant le pouvoir communiste.En décembre 1981, le général Wojciech Jaruzelski impose l'état de guerre pour réprimer Solidarność, mais le mouvement survit clandestinement. Après des années de pressions internes et internationales, le régime accepte d'ouvrir des négociations. En 1989, les accords de la Table ronde aboutissent à des élections partiellement libres : c'est la fin du régime communiste. Lech Wałęsa est élu président en 1990, symbolisant la transition pacifique vers la démocratie.Dans les années 1990, la Pologne amorce de profondes réformes économiques pour passer à l'économie de marché, non sans difficultés sociales. Elle entame également un rapprochement avec l'Europe occidentale et prépare son intégration future à l'Union européenne et à l'OTAN. Le pays tourne ainsi définitivement la page d'un demi-siècle de domination soviétique.En compagnie de l'historien Georges Mink, grand spécialiste de l'histoire de ce pays, et de Chochana Boukhobza, documentariste et spécialiste des camps de concentration, nous revenons sur toute cette période. Enfin, deux témoins, Chrystel et Jean, ayant fait le même type de voyage que le film, nous aident à vivre l'Histoire presque en direct.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Cette émission est réalisée en partenariat avec le film "Voyage avec mon père" (sortie le 9 avril 2025), réalisé par Julia von Heinz avec Lena Dunham, Stephen Fry, nous a donné envie de partir avec vous à la découverte de la Pologne de 1930 à 1995 !"Petit" synopsis : le film "Voyage avec mon père" retrace l'histoire d'une journaliste new-yorkaise, en 1991 après la chute du mur de Berlin, qui propose à son père, rescapé des camps, un voyage en Pologne, son pays d'origine. Elle cherche à comprendre l'histoire de sa famille, tandis que lui n'a aucune envie de déterrer le passé. Un voyage qui s'annonce compliqué !Toutes les informations sur le film : https://voyage-avec-mon-pere.lefilm.co/ et pour choisir votre séance : https://voyage-avec-mon-pere.lefilm.co/showtimes/?starts_at=1744329600000.Pologne 1930 - 1995Dans les années 1930, la Pologne est une république autoritaire dirigée par le maréchal Józef Piłsudski jusqu'à sa mort en 1935. Son régime a mis en place une forte centralisation du pouvoir, limitant les partis d'opposition, tout en cherchant à maintenir une position indépendante entre l'Allemagne nazie et l'Union soviétique. Mais en 1939, la situation bascule brutalement : le 1er septembre, l'Allemagne nazie envahit la Pologne, suivie le 17 septembre par l'invasion soviétique depuis l'est, conformément au pacte germano-soviétique. Le pays est alors démembré et occupé par les deux puissances.Pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, la Pologne subit des pertes humaines et matérielles immenses. Les nazis y organisent l'extermination des Juifs, notamment à Auschwitz, Treblinka et Majdanek, faisant de la Pologne le principal théâtre de la Shoah. Varsovie est détruite à plus de 80 %, notamment après l'insurrection de 1944. Malgré cela, une résistance intérieure intense se développe, tant contre les nazis que contre les Soviétiques. L'Armée de l'Intérieur (Armia Krajowa), fidèle au gouvernement polonais en exil à Londres, tente de libérer le pays avant l'arrivée de l'Armée rouge.À la fin de la guerre, en 1945, l'Union soviétique impose un régime communiste à la Pologne, malgré les engagements de Yalta. La République populaire de Pologne est proclamée, avec un gouvernement dominé par les communistes, sous le contrôle étroit de Moscou. Les décennies suivantes sont marquées par des tensions sociales, des pénuries économiques et une répression politique. En 1956, une première révolte éclate à Poznań, suivie d'un assouplissement temporaire sous Władysław Gomułka.Les années 1970 voient une modernisation économique financée par des emprunts occidentaux, sous la direction d'Edward Gierek, mais cette politique mène à une grave crise financière à la fin de la décennie. En 1980, une série de grèves dans les chantiers navals de Gdańsk donne naissance au syndicat indépendant Solidarność, dirigé par Lech Wałęsa. Ce mouvement de masse devient une force politique majeure, menaçant le pouvoir communiste.En décembre 1981, le général Wojciech Jaruzelski impose l'état de guerre pour réprimer Solidarność, mais le mouvement survit clandestinement. Après des années de pressions internes et internationales, le régime accepte d'ouvrir des négociations. En 1989, les accords de la Table ronde aboutissent à des élections partiellement libres : c'est la fin du régime communiste. Lech Wałęsa est élu président en 1990, symbolisant la transition pacifique vers la démocratie.Dans les années 1990, la Pologne amorce de profondes réformes économiques pour passer à l'économie de marché, non sans difficultés sociales. Elle entame également un rapprochement avec l'Europe occidentale et prépare son intégration future à l'Union européenne et à l'OTAN. Le pays tourne ainsi définitivement la page d'un demi-siècle de domination soviétique.En compagnie de l'historien Georges Mink, grand spécialiste de l'histoire de ce pays, et de Chochana Boukhobza, documentariste et spécialiste des camps de concentration, nous revenons sur toute cette période. Enfin, deux témoins, Chrystel et Jean, ayant fait le même type de voyage que le film, nous aident à vivre l'Histoire presque en direct.Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Se c'è una cosa che non si può rimproverare a Donald Trump, è proprio l'imprevedibilità. Quella, ad esempio, con cui, come un fulmine a ciel sereno, è sembrato cambiare decisamente orientamento sul come impostare le sue relazioni con Putin. Dopo una sterile serie di lusinghe politiche e di avances di tipo affaristico rivolte al leader del Cremlino, il presidente americano incomincia forse a stancarsi di essere preso in giro come fosse un povero babbeo da manipolare in lungo e in largo. Pertanto, viste le difficoltà fino ad oggi incontrate dalla trattativa - da lui fortemente voluta - per porre almeno una pausa al conflitto in Ucraina , il Tycoon decide ora di cambiare registro e di parlare chiaro, dicendosi , apertamente, “molto arrabbiato” con un Putin che adesso se ne viene anche fuori avanzando l'ipotesi – non concordata insieme - di un governo di transizione a Kiev, da costituirsi sotto l'egida dell'ONU. Sappia, quindi, il non più tanto amico, Valdimir Putin, che se “per colpa della Russia” non si dovesse raggiungere un accordo per “fermare lo spargimento di sangue in Ucraina”, allora gli Stati Uniti applicheranno ulteriori sanzioni al suo Paese. Per la verità, non sono pochi i commentatori che si chiedevano da tempo cosa sarebbe mai successo nel momento in cui Trump avesse perso la pazienza nei confronti dei “tira e molla” abilmente portati avanti dall'ex colonnello del KGB. Prima o poi, doveva per forza capitare, considerato che, almeno fino ad oggi, i Russi non avevano concesso a Washington sostanzialmente nulla: nemmeno uno striminzito “cessate il fuoco”di 30 giorni. Di conseguenza e giunti a questo punto, può Trump continuare a far finta di ignorare che la Russia tutto vuole tranne che una tregua? D'altra parte, è stato lo stesso Putin – al quale non si può certo negare il pregio della schiettezza con la quale espone sempre i suoi programmi – a chiarire, più volte, che quello che chiede ai suoi interlocutori americani non è un contentino tanto per tornarsene a casa dopo aver perso la faccia davanti al resto del mondo, ma è invece, “la risoluzione del problema alla radice”: e cioè, l'annessione dei territori ucraini attualmente occupati e la riduzione ad uno stato praticamente coloniale di ciò che resterebbe di una Ucraina, da lui, ideologicamente, mai riconosciuta come un'entità nazionale autonoma. E' difficile che due nazionalismi riescano ad andare d'accordo fra di loro: e la cosa sta emergendo anche in questa tragica partita che due pokeristi, abituati a “spennare” il pollo di turno, stanno oggi giocando sulla pelle di migliaia di cadaveri sia russi, che ucraini. Trump, sinora, si era illuso di poter contare su un “ottimo rapporto” con l'autocrate russo, senza però accorgersi del fatto che si è sempre trattato di un'intesa più teorica, che concreta. Certo, i due sono accomunati dallo stesso disprezzo per l'Europa e dal medesimo approccio nel concepire i rapporti internazionali come delle situazioni che si modellano soprattutto con l'uso della mano militare: tuttavia, queste affinità ideologiche non sono, comunque, sufficienti quando si passa dalle parole ai fatti. Ed i fatti di questi ultimi due mesi, hanno detto a Mosca che Trump non ha sospeso – se non per due giorni - gli aiuti all'Ucraina e non è nemmeno riuscito a “mandare a cuccia” quei cocciuti Paesi europei che Putin definiva come dei “cagnolini scodinzolanti” al guinzaglio di Washington... Insomma, se il Cremlino comprende che il sogno di una “nuova Yalta” è destinato a rimanere tale, Donald Trump, per il suo Nobel per la Pace, dovrà attendere tempi migliori. "Il Corsivo" a cura di Daniele Biacchessi non è un editoriale, ma un approfondimento sui fatti di maggiore interesse che i quotidiani spesso non raccontano. Un servizio in punta di penna che analizza con un occhio esperto quell'angolo nascosto delle notizie di politica, economia e cronaca. ___________________________________________________ Ascolta altre produzioni di Giornale Radio sul sito: https://www.giornaleradio.fm oppure scarica la nostra App gratuita: iOS - App Store - https://apple.co/2uW01yA Android - Google Play - http://bit.ly/2vCjiW3 Resta connesso e segui i canali social di Giornale Radio: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/giornaleradio.fm/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/giornale_radio_fm/?hl=it

En el programa de hoy, Fernando Villegas criticó duramente la columna de Giorgio Jackson sobre los logros del gobierno, enfocándose en el concepto de gratuidad como símbolo del deterioro educativo y cultural del país. Además, abordó la reciente manifestación de pescadores artesanales en Valparaíso y acusó al parlamentario Daniel Núñez de instigar la violencia, citando declaraciones de Fidel Espinoza. También cuestionó las declaraciones del subsecretario del Interior, Manuel Cordero, sobre la supuesta baja en los índices de criminalidad, calificándolo como un “spin doctor” alejado de la realidad ciudadana. Posteriormente, analizó cómo la percepción de inseguridad está generando una nostalgia activa por un régimen autoritario. Finalmente, reflexionó sobre la reconfiguración geopolítica global, planteando que grandes potencias como EE.UU., Rusia y China están en una disputa territorial similar a la de Yalta, y concluyó comentando una encuesta de Pulso Ciudadano y recomendando el libro The Beginnings of Western Science de David Lindberg. Para acceder al programa sin interrupción de comerciales, suscríbete a Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/elvillegas Temas principales y sus minutos: 00:01:45 - Crítica a Giorgio Jackson y la gratuidad 00:10:23 - Daniel Núñez y la violencia en protestas 00:19:08 - Manuel Cordero y criminalidad en Chile 00:27:23 - Inseguridad y nostalgia por dictadura 00:30:00 - Reordenamiento territorial global 00:47:05 - Encuesta Pulso Ciudadano y recomendación de libro

Tandis que Donald Trump menace de «prendre possession» du Groenland, Russes et Américains s'observent au-dessus du cercle polaire, chacun prêt à miser gros sur l'Arctique.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

There's a lot going on in The America. You may have noticed. So as the summer series grinds on — way behind schedule — we're joined by Associate Professor David Smith from the United States Study Centre.In this episode we talk, obviously, about the powers of POTUS and his Yalta 2.0 imperialist desires to annex Canada. And Greenland. And Mexico. We discuss how the new Trumpian America might affect Australia's favourite government program, AUKUS. And inevitably, we talk about Trump's weird relationship with Elon Musk.Full podcast details and credits at:https://the9pmedict.com/edict/00244/Please consider supporting this podcast with your cash-type money:https://the9pmedict.com/tip/https://skank.com.au/subscribe/

John is joined by New York Times opinion columnist M. Gessen to discuss Donald Trump's affinity for Vladimir Putin and what it means for Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine, and the whole of Europe. Gessen, winner of the 2017 National Book Award for The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia, contends it's now crystal clear that the U.S. has switched sides in the Ukraine war and offers a number of entwined explanations as to Trump's motives for doing so; that Putin's larger territorial/imperial ambitions are rooted in his fixation on the 1945 Yalta accords and the framework established there by FDR, Stalin, and Churchill; and that Europe's swift and dramatic response to Trump's turn against Zelensky may prove as historic as the other paradigm-shifting events of the past fortnight. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

His critics say President Trump is selling out Ukraine just as Franklin Delano Roosevelt supposedly sold out Poland at the 1945 Yalta Conference. Some historians have compared Trump's "appeasement" of Putin to Neville Chamberlain's appeasement of Hitler in 1938. Or, as Democrats contend, Donald Trump is betraying the Cold War legacy of Ronald Reagan. What if none of these historical episodes can be applied to today's crisis, as Ukraine defends itself against a nuclear-armed Russia? In this episode, historian Sergey Radchenko of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies compares and contrasts the past and present. Recommended reading: To Run the World: The Kremlin's Cold War Bid for Global Power by Sergey Radchenko The Talks That Could Have Ended the War in Ukraine by Samuel Charap and Sergey Radchenko (article in Foreign Affairs)

Following the German surrender in May 1945, the ‘Big Three' – the United States, the Soviet Union and Britain – met for the third and last time in conference. And this time, appropriately, they met on German territory, in Potsdam near Berlin. It was Soviet-held territory too, perhaps significant given the power with which the Soviet Union was emerging from the war.Indeed, its delegation was the only one to keep the same leader, Joseph Stalin, at its head, as he had been at Tehran and Yalta. Roosevelt had died. As for the British, after nearly ten years without a general election, they finally held one, and to general surprise, the victorious war Prime Minister Churchill was defeated by his deputy, Clement Attlee, the Labour leader. Attlee would form the first ever Labour government with a parliamentary majority. He would also take over from Churchill as leader of the British delegation at Potsdam.The conference took place under the shadow of the first successful test of a nuclear device, the day before the conference started. The US was now a nuclear power. That gave it quite an edge in international power politics.Although the device had been designed to use against Nazi Germany, since only Japan was left in the war, and given how high the casualties would be in an invasion of the Japanese home islands, the Americans dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima on 6 August 1945. To make sure the message had got through, they dropped another on Nagasaki on the 9th. The Japanese surrendered on the 15th, the only concession to their sensibilities being that the Emperor was not deposed. When the final Japanese surrender document was signed on 2 September, World War 2 was at last over. Illustration: The A-bomb dome in Hiroshima, Japan. Public DomainMusic: Bach Partita #2c by J Bu licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives (aka Music Sharing) 3.0 International License

Today we have the March 1, 1945, address by President Franklin Roosevelt to a joint session of Congress. He reports on the recent summit in Yalta with other Allied leaders and discusses the future of the war and plans for the post-war world. Visit our website at BrickPickleMedia.com/podcasts. Subscribe to the ad-free version at https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/worldwar2radio/subscribe.

Trung Quốc xem vai trò gìn giữ hòa bình ở Ukraine là bước đệm hướng tới một trật tự thế giới mới.Xem thêm.

At the Yalta conference, between the US, the Soviet Union and Britain, the tensions between the Allies became increasingly obvious. Representing Britain, Churchill wanted the Allies' war effort to be directed in such a way as to limit Soviet control over Central and Eastern Europe. The Soviets wanted to make sure they maximised the area they controlled. And given how powerfully they were surging towards Germany, it was hard to see how they could be blocked. Certainly, the Americans saw no way to stop them and weren't prepared to go along with Churchill's schemes for trying.The result was that the Soviets ended up completely controlling such nations as Poland and Czechoslovakia, and several other countries of Eastern Europe. They also got to Berlin first and symbolically planted a Soviet flag on top of the German Reichstag (parliament) building. With Hitler committing suicide while Soviet forces were only 500 metres away, this meant that when the Nazis surrendered on 8 May (to the western powers) or 9 May (to all the Allies including the Soviets), Stalin was in a powerful position among the victors.Illustration: A Soviet soldier plants a flag on the Reichstag building in Berlin. Public DomainMusic: Bach Partita #2c by J Bu licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives (aka Music Sharing) 3.0 International License

A new Crimean war! Ukraine is not worth the bones of a single British grenadier. Israel breaks Lebanon ceasefire more than 1500 times. West Bank carnage. And Trump's latest cockamie idea. Nurse!The new Big Three, China, Russia and the US, need to sit down and sort out these extraordinarily dangerous events. Starmer won't be at any new Yalta Dr. Nadim Haddadin, a NHS doctor of 15 years has been suspended for X posts on the Gaza genocide, he joins Moats in a blistering interview.Asfhin Rattansi is one of the worlds finest journalists returns to Moats to discuss the extraordinary times we live in. He talks the negotiants between Russia and the US, conscription for the British public and why you're Pro-American if you don't want World War 3. Dr. Nadim Haddadin: NHS doctor of 15 years suspended for X posts on the Gaza genocide- Twitter: https://x.com/nadimhcrAfshin Rattansi: Host of Going Underground & journalist- Twitter: https://x.com/afshinrattansi- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/afshinrattansi- YouTube: https://youtube.com/@afshinrattansigu- Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/GoingUnderground Become a MOATS Graduate at https://plus.acast.com/s/moatswithgorgegalloway. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Edition No98 | 18-02-2025 - After the meeting between Russia and the US, questions but with few answers. QUESTION: Can you take us a little bit in the room today? What was the interaction like? How would you characterize the discussions? MR WITKOFF: It was positive, upbeat, constructive, everybody there to get to the right outcome, solution based. We discussed it afterwards. We couldn't have imagined a better result after this session. It was very, very solid.Matthew Miller @matthewamillerNegotiating an end to a war is easy if your plan is to surrender.John Sipher @johnsipher.bsky.socialRussia is at its weakest in years. Putin is in a precarious situation. They are attacking western interests around the world and murdering Europeans. Why is Rubio bending a knee and showing weakness?David Frum @davidfrumWhen FDR struck an over-the-heads-of-eastern-Europe deal at Yalta in Feb 1945, Stalin had 300+ divisions in the field vs Nazi Germany. The impending unilateral Trump sellout of Ukraine occurs when Putin is battered and almost broke.¬ Garry Kasparov @Kasparov63This looks more like Molotov-Ribbentrop than Yalta. It's business, dividing up Ukraine for profit. And they will try and may succeed unless Europe acts quickly instead of just talks.----------SILICON CURTAIN FILM FUNDRAISERA project to make a documentary film in Ukraine, to raise awareness of Ukraine's struggle and in supporting a team running aid convoys to Ukraine's front-line towns.https://buymeacoffee.com/siliconcurtain/extras----------SILICON CURTAIN LIVE EVENTS - FUNDRAISER CAMPAIGN 10 Events in 10 months - Advocacy for a Ukrainian victory with Silicon Curtainhttps://buymeacoffee.com/siliconcurtain/extrasOur first live events this year in Lviv and Kyiv were a huge success. Now we need to maintain this momentum, and change the tide towards a Ukrainian victory. The Silicon Curtain Roadshow is an ambitious campaign to run 10 events in 10 months (at a minimum). We may add more venues to the program, depending on the success of the fundraising campaign. https://buymeacoffee.com/siliconcurtain/extrasWe need to scale up our support for Ukraine, and these events are designed to have a major impact. Your support in making it happen is greatly appreciated. All events will be recorded professionally and published for free on the Silicon Curtain channel. Where possible, we will also live-stream events.https://buymeacoffee.com/siliconcurtain/extras----------SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/siliconcurtainhttps://www.patreon.com/siliconcurtain----------

Ecoutez Le 2ème œil de Philippe Caverivière avec Alex Vizorek du 18 février 2025.

Se cumplen 80 año de la cumbre en la que se decidió el futuro de Alemania y el resto de Europa tras la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Testigos de esa reunión fueron Sarah Churchill, Ana Roosevelt y Cathleem Harriman. Te contamos su historia

Massimo Giannini, editorialista e opinionista di Repubblica, racconta dal lunedì al venerdì il suo punto di vista sullo scenario politico e sulle notizie di attualità, italiane e internazionali. “Circo Massimo - Lo spettacolo della politica“ lo puoi ascoltare sull’app di One Podcast, sull’app di Repubblica, e su tutte le principali piattaforme.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

By the time of the Yalta conference in February 1945, between the USA, Soviet Union and Britain, the latter still being treated as a great power though its decline was already clear, there could be little doubt that the war in the west, at least, was heading towards victory for the Allies.The Soviets were sweeping through eastern Europe and were only 65 km from Berlin.The D-day landings had gone well, in great part thanks to the brilliant planning work of Admiral Bertram Ramsay, and since then – despite a few setbacks, at least two of the more serious down to Bernard Montgomery – the America and British armies had swept through northern France, liberating Paris, and then Belgium. Meanwhile, another landing, this time by American and French troops, in the south of France had added further momentum to the advance.The war was drawing to its end. The main leaders of the Allies came to Yalta to discuss what happened to Europe next, once peace had been secured. The decisions we'll talk about next week, but for now it was clear that all the Allied sides would be negotiating from positions of strength.Illustration: Driving down the Champs Elysées of newly liberated Paris, with the Arc de Triomphe behind, on 26 August 1945, the halftrack ‘Guernica' from the Ninth Company – La Nueve – manned by exiled republican veterans of Spain's civil war, from Philippe Leclerc's Deuxième DB. Public DomainMusic: Bach Partita #2c by J Bu licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives (aka Music Sharing) 3.0 International License

"PREVIEW: UKRAINE: Colleague Jeff McCausland discusses the risks of a Yalta-style conference for the imminent Ukraine peace talks. More tonight." 1945 Stalin FDR at Yalta

Nieves Concostrina habla sobre lo ocurrido en Europa tras la Conferencia de Yalta.

Nieves Concostrina habla sobre lo ocurrido en Europa tras la Conferencia de Yalta.

durée : 01:02:15 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Albane Penaranda - Brutalité, fourberie et convoitise des Russes pendant cette conférence de Yalta face aux illusions des Américains avec un président Roosevelt affaibli, épuisé qui mourra quelques mois plus tard, tel est le sujet de ce "Dossier de l'histoire" de 1966, à travers des lectures et des archives sonores. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar

En la tele recibimos a Leonor Watling y a Adolfo Valor que viene a presentarnos la serie 'La vida breve'. Nieves Concostrina nos acerca al 11 de febrero de 1945: Finaliza la Conferencia de Yalta. Terminamos con 'Lo que queda del día' con Isaías Lafuente.

Nieves Concostrina habla sobre lo ocurrido en Europa tras la Conferencia de Yalta.

La conférence de Yalta, qui a eu lieu en février 1945 entre Churchill, Roosevelt et Staline, est souvent perçue comme un partage du monde, mais en réalité, elle reflète plutôt une illusion d'entente entre les trois grands vainqueurs de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. À ce moment-là, la guerre n'est pas encore terminée, et Staline, qui est en position de force, obtient des concessions, comme la promesse de faire la guerre au Japon peu après la capitulation allemande. Nous en apprenons plus avec Pierre Marlet. Merci pour votre écoute N'hésistez pas à vous abonner également aux podcasts des séquences phares de Matin Première: L'Invité Politique : https://audmns.com/LNCogwPL'édito politique « Les Coulisses du Pouvoir » : https://audmns.com/vXWPcqxL'humour de Matin Première : https://audmns.com/tbdbwoQRetrouvez tous les contenus de la RTBF sur notre plateforme Auvio.be Retrouvez également notre offre info ci-dessous : Le Monde en Direct : https://audmns.com/TkxEWMELes Clés : https://audmns.com/DvbCVrHLe Tournant : https://audmns.com/moqIRoC5 Minutes pour Comprendre : https://audmns.com/dHiHssrEt si vous avez apprécié ce podcast, n'hésitez pas à nous donner des étoiles ou des commentaires, cela nous aide à le faire connaître plus largement.

Did Churchill and FDR really 'lose' the Yalta conference to Josef Stalin? 

Stéphane Bern nous entraine en Crimée, sur les bords de la mer noire, pour revivre la conférence de Yalta qui a réuni, il y a 80 ans jour pour jour, à la demande de Staline, les dirigeants américains et anglais, Franklin Delano Roosevelt et Winston Churchill, pour imaginer le monde d'après-guerre. Une guerre qui n'était pas encore terminée... Quelles décisions ont été prises durant cette conférence ? Peut-on considérer, comme l'a affirmé le Général de Gaulle, qu'elle a planté le décor de la Guerre Froide ? Comment a-t-elle permis d'avancer dans la future Organisation des Nations Unies ? Pour en parler, Stéphane Bern reçoit Nicolas Badalassi, professeur des Universités en histoire contemporaine, auteur de "Reconstruire l'Europe 45 ans après Yalta : La Charte de Paris" (Editions du Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques)

Nieves Concostrina habla sobre sobre lo que se acordó en los encuentros de Teherán y Yalta y como la clave está en la buena relación entre Stalin y Roosevelt.

Stéphane Bern nous entraine en Crimée, sur les bords de la mer noire, pour revivre la conférence de Yalta qui a réuni, il y a 80 ans jour pour jour, à la demande de Staline, les dirigeants américains et anglais, Franklin Delano Roosevelt et Winston Churchill, pour imaginer le monde d'après-guerre. Une guerre qui n'était pas encore terminée... Quelles décisions ont été prises durant cette conférence ? Peut-on considérer, comme l'a affirmé le Général de Gaulle, qu'elle a planté le décor de la Guerre Froide ? Comment a-t-elle permis d'avancer dans la future Organisation des Nations Unies ? Pour en parler, Stéphane Bern reçoit Nicolas Badalassi, professeur des Universités en histoire contemporaine, auteur de "Reconstruire l'Europe 45 ans après Yalta : La Charte de Paris" (Editions du Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques)

Nieves Concostrina habla sobre sobre lo que se acordó en los encuentros de Teherán y Yalta y como la clave está en la buena relación entre Stalin y Roosevelt.

durée : 01:02:27 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Albane Penaranda - Du 4 au 11 février 1945 se tient à Yalta, en Crimée, la célèbre conférence qui y réunit Staline, Churchill et Roosevelt. Considérée pendant longtemps comme le moment du "partage du monde", il est bon de se replonger dans le contexte de cette année 1945 pour mieux comprendre ce qu'il s'y est joué. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar

Nieves Concostrina habla sobre sobre lo que se acordó en los encuentros de Teherán y Yalta y como la clave está en la buena relación entre Stalin y Roosevelt.

Mariola Cubels recibe en su plató a Paula Vázquez, presentadora de televisión. En corresponsales;  teniendo como base la radiografía de la inmigración en España" hemos querido preguntarnos  ¿Cómo sería esa foto, esa radiografía, en los países de nuestro entorno?. Nieves Concostrina nos acerca al 4 de febrero de 1945: Cumbre en Yalta: Saben aquel que diu que van un ruso, un inglés y un americano. Terminamos con 'Lo que queda del día' 

A cimeira que desenhou a ordem geopolítica mundial do pós-guerra.

Edoardo Angelino"RDI. Il muro di Firenze"Besa Muciwww.besamucieditore.itDurante la conferenza di Yalta (febbraio 1945) Roosevelt e Stalin decidono di dividere l'Italia in due parti come la Germania. Nel Nord nasce la Repubblica Democratica Italiana (RDI), simile alla DDR (Germania Orientale) e sotto l'influenza sovietica; al Sud, invece, resta il Regno d'Italia sotto la monarchia sabauda, fortemente condizionata dalla Chiesa e dagli USA. La Repubblica Democratica Italiana segue il destino degli stati dell'Europa Orientale ed è scossa da rivolte e repressioni fino alla caduta del Muro di Firenze nell'89 e alla successiva riunificazione con il Regno. Il Regno del Sud invece ha uno sviluppo industriale impetuoso di tipo occidentale, con tutti i pregi e i difetti del capitalismo. In questo scenario è ambientata la vicenda di Amedeo Millero, professore che per quarant'anni insegna storia e marxismo leninismo nel liceo della sua città in Piemonte, acquistandosi fama di docente severissimo e spietato. Egli, ormai in pensione, alla fine del marzo '91 prende il treno per Roma e durante il viaggio rievoca il proprio passato non in modo lineare, ma alternando episodi recenti ad altri lontani.Il libro, attraverso le vicende del protagonista, fa emergere una storia d'Italia fantastica ma possibile, indaga sui meccanismi che hanno portato l'utopia marxista a trasformarsi nel socialismo reale e sui rapporti tra intellettuali e potere in un regime dittatoriale.Edoardo Angelino (Alessandria, 1950) vive ad Asti. Docente in pensione, ha insegnato Storia e filosofia nel Liceo Scientifico della sua città e attualmente tiene lezioni di Geopolitica all'Università delle Tre Età. Ha esordito con il romanzo L'inverno dei mongoli, per Einaudi, grazie al quale si è aggiudicato il Premio Berto 1995 ed è entrato nei finalisti del Premio Alassio. Ha pubblicato anche, con Paolo Berta, Un tuffo nella vita (Lindau, 2016). Per Besa ha già pubblicato Binario morto (1998), vincitore del Premio Fedeli come miglior romanzo poliziesco dell'anno.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

In this episode Patrick is joined by writer and historian Giles Milton, who is expertly placed to discuss the seismic events of the Yalta conference which dictated the fate of post war Europe, which he describes so eloquently in his book Checkmate in Berlin. Yalta was the scene of a political battle between the leaders of the soon to be victorious Allied powers, with Stalin skilfully manoeuvring and exploiting his strong hand with the Red Army having already wrestled control over most of Eastern Europe. If you have any thoughts or questions, you can send them to - battlegroundukraine@gmail.com Producer: James Hodgson X: @PodBattleground Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

LONDINIUM90AD: Gaius and Germanicus observe the Emperor President fencing with the Emperor Putin and the Emperor Xi.   #FriendsofHistoryDebatingSociety 1945 Stalin and churchill at Yalta

Você sabia que a Guerra Fria, um dos períodos mais tensos da história moderna, foi moldada por decisões de um presidente que mal teve tempo de se preparar para o cargo? Neste vídeo, exploramos os eventos que levaram Harry Truman, vice-presidente dos EUA, a assumir a presidência em meio ao caos global. Descubra como a ausência de uma transição adequada de Franklin D. Roosevelt impactou a geopolítica mundial e por que Truman tomou decisões que definiram a ordem internacional no século XX. Prepare-se para mergulhar em uma narrativa fascinante sobre ambição, inexperiência e poder. Revelamos os bastidores das conferências de Yalta, as tensões entre os Aliados e como Stalin, Churchill e Roosevelt influenciaram o futuro do mundo. Este é o retrato de um momento histórico que mudou tudo – e do homem que, sem querer, criou a Guerra Fria. Não se esqueça de curtir, compartilhar e comentar sua opinião sobre essa história impressionante!

Plus de 69 millions d'enfants vivaient dans la pauvreté, fin 2021, au sein de l'OCDE et de l'Union européenne plus (source Unicef). Comment préserver les enfants de la pauvreté ?Ces dernières années, la pauvreté infantile a augmenté dans des pays comme la France, le Royaume-Uni ou la Norvège, constate l'Unicef. Elle baisse toutefois en Pologne, en Slovénie, ou en Grèce. La clé du succès : le soutien financier des familles. Au Portugal, où le risque de pauvreté a augmenté l'an dernier pour la première fois, depuis 7 ans, certaines municipalités se mobilisent. Comme à Vila Nova de Gaia, dans le nord du pays, où s'est rendue notre correspondante Marie-Line Darcy.L'Irlande n'est pas épargnée et les associations tirent le signal d'alarme sur le nombre de mineurs qui sont sans domicile. Loger les enfants et les jeunes devrait être une priorité politique, surtout à l'approche des élections, mais pour l'instant, la réaction se fait attendre. Les explications à Dublin de Clémence Pénard.  Les attaques contre le droit européen se multiplientAu début du mois de septembre 2024, l'Allemagne a rétabli les contrôles à ses frontières, emboitant le pas à de nombreux autres pays européens. La loi le permet uniquement de façon temporaire, pourtant ces contrôles s'inscrivent désormais dans la durée, remettant en cause la libre-circulation des personnes, inscrit dans les traités européens. Quelques jours plus tard, les Pays-Bas, la Hongrie et la Pologne annonçaient eux aussi leur intention de déroger aux règles européennes pour appliquer une politique migratoire plus stricte. Comme eux, de nombreux pays de l'UE remettent en cause le droit européen et international en matière d'asile et migration. Un dossier de Wyloën Munhoz-Boillot.  Rideau de fer, l'occupation soviétiqueC'est un documentaire qui résonne avec la guerre en Ukraine, diffusé en trois parties sur la plateforme d'Arte. Il raconte l'histoire d'une domination orchestrée par Staline qui avait pourtant promis aux alliés, à Yalta, d'organiser des élections libres après la guerre. Comment expliquer que Moscou soit parvenu si facilement à l'époque à placer ses pions y compris dans l'est de l'Allemagne qui, à l'époque, n'est pas encore la RDA ? C'est la question que Frédérique Lebel a posée à la réalisatrice Tania Rakhmanova.  

In today's war diary, Alexander Shelest and Alexey Arestovich discussed the main news on the 966th day of war:* apologies for sound issues towards the end of the stream. Sometimes it is challeging to maintain quality en route.➤ 00:00 Greetings. Fundraiser for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.➤ 02:10 Climax of pseudo-reality and transfer of responsibility to the West. The ultimate question to partners from President Zelensky: Ukraine's joining NATO or acquiring nuclear weapons. How do Western partners respond to this?➤ 06:25 Is a ceasefire by the US presidential election or by the New Year still realistic?➤ 10:08 Russia attacking or Russia rooting for peace?➤ 10:58 President Zelensky: winter is coming... A comic book about Ukraine's prospects.➤ 13:44 Democracy often creates pseudo-reality, which prevents us from correctly understanding the world and taking the right actions.➤ 15:06 "There are no enemies inside Ukraine." Can Arestovych return to the country?➤ 17:19 Presentation of the victory plan by President Zelensky. Why did the congress (Rada) applaud?➤ 18:35 Points of Ukraine's victory plan are unfeasible from the inception.➤ 21:00 Ukraine's victory plan should be voted for in a referendum. Why aren't the points of the plan being discussed? The colossal power of the masses.➤ 23:49 Ukrainian government is concerned about a possible rebellion by right-wing political forces.➤ 24:55 Is Ukraine capable of creating a nuclear bomb in a few weeks?➤ 26:16 Continuation of the war or ceasefire: what can President Zelensky do?➤ 27:50 Whom did nuclear weapons ever help and can Ukraine use them to protect itself?➤ 31:00 Situation at the front: the dismemberment of the Ukrainian group is a military achievement of the Russians. Signs that Ukraine has a militia, not an army.➤ 34:36 Refuseniks, and losses of the Ukrainian army. Busified mobilization.➤ 36:31 Commentary by the Khmelnytskyi prosecutor's office: most of the regional prosecutors are disabled. "Whom to be?" - the choice facing Ukrainian people according to Pelevin.➤ 38:45 What does the freezing of war mean for Ukraine? Both Russia and Ukraine suffered a defeat?➤ 43:37 If Russia did not win, why should they stop? "Friends of peace" for Ukraine.➤ 48:00 Why are Russians building roads in the occupied territories? - Ukraine paid for the fun of the "big Yalta".➤ 50:10 How can Ukraine get a better peace deal in current situation?➤ 51:10 Domestic political situation in Ukraine after ceasefire: Zaluzhny's statement supporting Zelensky's plan.➤ 55:02 Results of the poll on Alexander Shelest's channel. People have given their assessment. The turnout at the elections must be the highest on record, or the state will not survive.Olexiy Arestovych (Kiev): Advisor to the Office of Ukraine President : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleksiy_ArestovychOfficial channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjWy2g76QZf7QLEwx4cB46gAlexander Shelest - Ukranian journalist. Youtube: @a.shelest   Telegram: https://t.me/shelestlive

Join BeFluent - https://bit.ly/3PnVR6u «Очень возможно, что она бывает на первых представлениях», — думал он."It's very possible she attends first performances," he thought. Театр был полон. И тут, как вообще во всех губернских театрах, был туман повыше люстры, шумно беспокоилась галерка; в первом ряду перед началом представления стояли местные франты, заложив руки назад; и тут, в губернаторской ложе, на первом месте сидела губернаторская дочь в боа, а сам губернатор скромно прятался за портьерой, и видны были только его руки; качался занавес, оркестр долго настраивался.The theater was full. And here, as in all provincial theaters, there was a haze above the chandelier, the gallery was noisily restless; in the front row, local dandies stood with their hands behind their backs before the performance began; and here, in the governor's box, in the front seat, sat the governor's daughter in a boa, while the governor himself modestly hid behind the curtain, only his hands visible; the curtain swayed, the orchestra took a long time to tune. Всё время, пока публика входила и занимала места, Гуров жадно искал глазами.All the while, as the audience entered and took their seats, Gurov eagerly searched with his eyes. Вошла и Анна Сергеевна.Anna Sergeyevna entered.Она села в третьем ряду, и когда Гуров взглянул на нее, то сердце у него сжалось, и он понял ясно, что для него теперь на всем свете нет ближе, дороже и важнее человека;She sat in the third row, and when Gurov looked at her, his heart tightened, and he clearly understood that for him now, in the whole world, there was no one closer, dearer, or more important; она, затерявшаяся в провинциальной толпе, эта маленькая женщина, ничем не замечательная, с вульгарною лорнеткой в руках, наполняла теперь всю его жизнь, была его горем, радостью, единственным счастьем, какого он теперь желал для себя;she, lost in the provincial crowd, this little woman, unremarkable in any way, with a vulgar lorgnette in her hands, now filled his entire life, was his sorrow, his joy, the only happiness he now desired for himself; и под звуки плохого оркестра, дрянных обывательских скрипок он думал о том, как она хороша.and to the sounds of the bad orchestra, the lousy provincial violins, he thought about how beautiful she was.  Думал и мечтал.He thought and dreamed. Вместе с Анной Сергеевной вошел и сел рядом молодой человек с небольшими бакенами, очень высокий, сутулый;Along with Anna Sergeyevna, a young man with small sideburns, very tall, stooping, also entered and sat beside her; он при каждом шаге покачивал головой и, казалось, постоянно кланялся.with each step, he bobbed his head and seemed to be constantly bowing. Вероятно, это был муж, которого она тогда в Ялте, в порыве горького чувства, обозвала лакеем.This was probably the husband, whom she had bitterly called a lackey in a moment of distress in Yalta. И в самом деле, в его длинной фигуре, в бакенах, в небольшой лысине было что-то лакейски-скромное, улыбался он сладко, и в петлице у него блестел какой-то ученый значок, точно лакейский номер.And indeed, there was something lackey-like in his long figure, his sideburns, his small bald spot; he smiled sweetly, and some scholarly badge, like a lackey's number, shone in his lapel. В первом антракте муж ушел курить, она осталась в кресле.In the first intermission, the husband left to smoke, she remained in her seat. Гуров, сидевший тоже в партере, подошел к ней и сказал дрожащим голосом, улыбаясь насильно:Gurov, Telegram Channel - https://t.me/befluentinrussian

We all know about the atrocities perpetrated by the German Nazis in WWII. What if we told you that the Allied Forces, primarily England and the U.S. were involved in something almost as sinister during the same time frame. What we are discussing today has been all but erased and very rarely even mentioned, but it did happen and you will discover why the forces of good did not want this information out! This truly floored us!Email us at: downtherh@protonmail.com