Podcasts about Quid

An interview with Lee Jae Myung, South Korea's president, a year into his role. Though he has stabilised a turbulent polity and overseen a stock market rally, the path ahead may be bumpy. Can India's cockroach party become a powerful political movement? And celebrating the creator of “Persepolis”, Marjane Satrapi. Watch extended clips from Insider hereGuests and host:Noah Sneider, East Asia bureau chiefTom Sasse, South Asia bureau chiefAnn Wroe, obituaries editorRosie Blau, host of “The Intelligence”Topics covered: South Korea, Lee Jae Myung, North KoreaCockroach party, Narendra Modi, Gen-Z protestsMarjane Satrapi, Iran, PersepolisListen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.  Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

An interview with Lee Jae Myung, South Korea's president, a year into his role. Though he has stabilised a turbulent polity and overseen a stock market rally, the path ahead may be bumpy. Can India's cockroach party become a powerful political movement? And celebrating the creator of “Persepolis”, Marjane Satrapi. Watch extended clips from Insider hereGuests and host:Noah Sneider, East Asia bureau chiefTom Sasse, South Asia bureau chiefAnn Wroe, obituaries editorRosie Blau, host of “The Intelligence”Topics covered: South Korea, Lee Jae Myung, North KoreaCockroach party, Narendra Modi, Gen-Z protestsMarjane Satrapi, Iran, PersepolisListen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.  Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

6 décembre 2015. Alors que le Front national est en très bonne voie pour gagner la région PACA, Christophe Castaner, candidat du PS arrivé troisième lors du premier tour des régionales, prend la décision de retirer sa liste pour permettre la victoire de son concurrent LR, Christian Estrosi. Est-ce si simple de s'effacer d'une institution pendant six ans au nom du barrage républicain ? Comment gérer la frustration de ses colistiers ? Quid de son avenir personnel ? Dans cet épisode, Christophe Castaner, désormais retiré de la vie politique, décrypte ce choix au micro d'Erwan Bruckert, rédacteur en chef adjoint du service Politique de L'Express. Chaque semaine, dans Anatomie d'une décision, L'Express interroge un grand patron, une dirigeante, une personnalité politique, un responsable militaire qui a dû, dans sa carrière, prendre une décision cruciale. Positif ou négatif, ce changement a eu des conséquences dont on peut tirer des enseignements. L'équipe : Présentation : Erwan BruckertMontage : Hugo DuportRéalisation : Jules KrotRédaction en chef : Charlotte Baris et Thibauld Mathieu Crédits : France Inter, INA, BFMTV Musique et habillage : Emmanuel Herschon / Studio Torrent Logo : Alice Lagarde Pour nous écrire : podcast@lexpress.fr Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

En formula grammatica quae adhiberi potest ad talia exprimenda: aliquid alicui aliquid movetExamples:hoc risum mihi movethoc mihi admirationem movethoc mihi fastidium movetIn hoc episodio, de V quae fastidium mihi moveant loquor.Quid fastidium tibi movet?Transcript: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jZ7Beg3Hg8Sdmgim59o4txn2eX8cDsUz9WO8yqQ4kig/edit?usp=sharingScholae Aestivae: www.habesnelac.com/courses

36 Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.Estote ergo misericordes sicut et Pater vester misericors est. 37 Judge not, and you shall not be judged. Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. Forgive, and you shall be forgiven.Nolite judicare, et non judicabimini : nolite condemnare, et non condemnabimini. Dimitte, et dimittemini. 38 Give, and it shall be given to you: good measure and pressed down and shaken together and running over shall they give into your bosom. For with the same measure that you shall mete withal, it shall be measured to you again.Date, et dabitur vobis : mensuram bonam, et confertam, et coagitatam, et supereffluentem dabunt in sinum vestrum. Eadem quippe mensura, qua mensi fueritis, remetietur vobis. 39 And he spoke also to them a similitude: Can the blind lead the blind? do they not both fall into the ditch?Dicebat autem illis et similitudinem : Numquid potest caecus caecum ducere? nonne ambo in foveam cadunt? 40 The disciple is not above his master: but every one shall be perfect, if he be as his master.Non est discipulus super magistrum : perfectus autem omnis erit, si sit sicut magister ejus. 41 And why seest thou the mote in thy brother's eye: but the beam that is in thy own eye thou considerest not?Quid autem vides festucam in oculo fratris tui, trabem autem, quae in oculo tuo est, non consideras? 42 Or how canst thou say to thy brother: Brother, let me pull the mote out of thy eye, when thou thyself seest not the beam in thy own eye? Hypocrite, cast first the beam out of thy own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to take out the mote from thy brother's eye.aut quomodo potes dicere fratri tuo : Frater, sine ejiciam festucam de oculo tuo : ipse in oculo tuo trabem non videns? Hypocrita, ejice primum trabem de oculo tuo : et tunc perspicies ut educas festucam de oculo fratris tui.Let us be merciful, as our Father in heaven is merciful.

17 And it came to pass on a certain day, as he sat teaching, that there were also Pharisees and doctors of the law sitting by, that were come out of every town of Galilee, and Judea and Jerusalem: and the power of the Lord was to heal them.Et factum est in una dierum, et ipse sedebat docens. Et erant pharisaei sedentes, et legis doctores, qui venerunt ex omni castello Galilaeae, et Judaeae, et Jerusalem : et virtus Domini erat ad sanandum eos. 18 And behold, men brought in a bed a man, who had the palsy: and they sought means to bring him in, and to lay him before him.Et ecce viri portantes in lecto hominem, qui erat paralyticus : et quaerebant eum inferre, et ponere ante eum. 19 And when they could not find by what way they might bring him in, because of the multitude, they went up upon the roof, and let him down through the tiles with his bed into the midst before Jesus.Et non invenientes qua parte illum inferrent prae turba, ascenderunt supra tectum, et per tegulas summiserunt eum cum lecto in medium ante Jesum. 20 Whose faith when he saw, he said: Man, thy sins are forgiven thee.Quorum fidem ut vidit, dixit : Homo, remittuntur tibi peccata tua. 21 And the scribes and Pharisees began to think, saying: Who is this who speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?Et coeperunt cogitare scribae et pharisaei, dicentes : Quis est hic, qui loquitur blasphemias? quis potest dimittere peccata, nisi solus Deus? 22 And when Jesus knew their thoughts, answering, he said to them: What is it you think in your hearts?Ut cognovit autem Jesus cogitationes eorum, respondens, dixit ad illos : Quid cogitatis in cordibus vestris? 23 Which is easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee; or to say, Arise and walk?Quid est facilius dicere : Dimittuntur tibi peccata : an dicere : Surge, et ambula? 24 But that you may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,) I say to thee, Arise, take up thy bed, and go into thy house.Ut autem sciatis quia Filius hominis habet potestatem in terra dimittendi peccata, ( ait paralytico) tibi dico, surge, tolle lectum tuum, et vade in domum tuam. 25 And immediately rising up before them, he took up the bed on which he lay; and he went away to his own house, glorifying God.Et confestim consurgens coram illis, tulit lectum in quo jacebat : et abiit in domum suam, magnificans Deum. 26 And all were astonished; and they glorified God. And they were filled with fear, saying: We have seen wonderful things today.Et stupor apprehendit omnes, et magnificabant Deum. Et repleti sunt timore, dicentes : Quia vidimus mirabilia hodie.Jesus worked wonders by the power of the Holy Ghost: healing of the man with the palsy; He remitted the sins of this sick man at the same time that He restored him to health.

A bonus mini-pod from the road back from EroSpain.We went to Vegas in April. Three and a half thousand miles across the Atlantic. Customs paperwork was a web form. Some clicking, some typing, done. Then we went to Spain for EroSpain Barcelona. Nine hundred miles across one short hop of Europe. Customs paperwork cost nearly eight hundred quid in stamps, an ATA carnet via the chamber of commerce, four stamps each way, and a building site we had to cross to get to work. The doorstep cost more than the ocean.This is the EroSpain episode of record. Caz and I sit down together for the mini-pod treatment — about thirteen minutes, two-handed, no script — and we walk you through what it actually takes to ship a trade show stand into the EU since Brexit. The carnet. The chamber of commerce. The four stamps. Frankie the Tankie versus the budget Fiat. Spanish drivers who treat the car horn like a percussion instrument. A 787 with a tail cam and crew sales versus an A320neo with a packet of pretzels and no wifi. Three days of paella. A rooftop pool we never got near because Brexit didn't get us that one, the wind did. And the Spanish, who frankly speak better English than I do.It's a working podcast, not a holiday slideshow. If you ship product internationally, if you've watched post-Brexit trade shipping turn from a clipboard into a forensic accountancy exercise, or if you just like the gap between what a trip costs on paper and what it actually costs in admin, this one's for you.If you're enjoying the show, hit the follow button wherever you're listening. And if you've got a moment, a rating or a quick review genuinely helps other people find us.Mentioned in this episode: EroSpain Barcelona, ATA carnet, post-Brexit trade shipping, Altitude Intimates Las Vegas, Frankie the Tankie."I Make Sex Toys" is the personal podcast of Wayne Allen, founder and Managing Director of E-Stim Systems, the UK manufacturer of electrostimulation products. Made in Britain since 2004. Find us at e-stim.co.uk and at imakesextoys.me.Drop us a message, we cannot reply directly but it would be great to hear from you"I Make Sex Toys" is the personal podcast of Wayne Allen, the Director of E-Stim Systems. We have been creating ElectroStimulation Technology since 2004, Find out what really happens behind the doors of a specialist sex toy company.Please Note the content of these podcasts are not designed to be Explicit or Erotic but we may discuss adult topics and therefore these podcasts are not suitable for children or those of a nervous disposition. You have been warned.If you are interested in E-Stim Systems the company, or any of our products, have a look at https://estim.store

Le Sénégal se réveille ce matin avec un nouveau Premier ministre et dans les prochaines heures, on devrait connaitre le nouveau président de l'Assemblée nationale… Les cartes politiques sont donc rebattues. On commence par le nouveau premier ministre : « Après Sonko le tribun, Lo le technicien à la primature » : c'est ainsi que le site Seneplus qualifie Ahmadou Al Aminou Mohamed Lo, qui occupait auparavant le poste de ministre de l'Agenda national de Transformation Sénégal 2050. Le nouveau chef du gouvernement « est présenté comme un expert de tous les circuits financiers nationaux et internationaux, pointe Seneplus. Un profil stratégique dans un contexte où le Sénégal doit gérer une situation budgétaire difficile tout en poursuivant ses ambitions. » « Un économiste à la Primature », titre Le Soleil. « Le Président de la République confie ainsi l'exécutif à un haut commis de l'État rompu aux questions monétaires et financières, présent au cœur du gouvernement depuis le premier jour de la nouvelle ère. Spécialiste reconnu de la macroéconomie, de la régulation bancaire, des marchés financiers et de la finance islamique, Ahmadou Al Aminou Mohamed Lo compte parmi les principaux artisans de la mise en marche de la nouvelle gouvernance. » À lire aussiSénégal : Ahmadou Al Aminou Mohamed Lo nommé Premier ministre après le limogeage d'Ousmane Sonko Sonko président… de l'Assemblée nationale ? Alors, « le nouveau Premier ministre du Sénégal connu : Diomaye passe à l'offensive », relève Xalima. En effet, précise Dakar Actu, c'est ce mardi matin que l'Assemblée nationale se réunit : « L'ordre du jour porte sur la réintégration du député Ousmane Sonko ainsi que sur l'élection d'un nouveau président de l'Assemblée nationale. (…) Une séance qui s'annonce donc décisive dans le nouveau réaménagement institutionnel, après le limogeage du Premier ministre Sonko. » « Ousmane Sonko est-il en route vers le perchoir ? », s'interroge Afrik.com. « L'objectif du parti Pastef est de répliquer à la décision de Bassirou Diomaye Faye en installant son leader historique à la tête du pouvoir législatif. Libéré de la discipline gouvernementale, Ousmane Sonko disposerait alors d'une tribune stratégique pour peser sur le budget, les commissions d'enquête et le calendrier des réformes. » D'autant, rappelle Afrik.com, que « le Pastef dispose d'un levier puissant avec une large majorité de 130 sièges sur 165, acquise lors des élections législatives de novembre 2024. » Toutefois, tempère le site panafricain, « une inconnue de taille subsiste concernant la légalité de cette opération. Plusieurs juristes et figures politiques contestent le droit d'Ousmane Sonko à reprendre son écharpe de député. Les anciens parlementaires Cheikhou Oumar Sy et Théodore Chérif Monteil rappellent que la loi sénégalaise considère généralement le remplacement par un suppléant comme définitif pour toute la durée de la législature. La séance de ce mardi s'annonce donc électrique. Si la réintégration d'Ousmane Sonko est validée, le Sénégal entrera dans une forme de cohabitation inédite. Le chef de l'État composera alors avec une majorité parlementaire fidèle à son principal rival politique. » À lire aussiSénégal : l'Assemblée nationale doit se réunir en plénière pour élire son nouveau président Objectif 2029 Et dans ce contexte, analyse WalfQuotidien, « l'horizon de la présidentielle de 2029 devient déjà l'obsession centrale. Ousmane Sonko apparaît plus que jamais déterminé à accéder à la magistrature suprême. Sa majorité parlementaire a déjà engagé des réformes du dispositif électoral perçues par certains comme destinées à lever les obstacles qui avaient empêché sa candidature en 2024. Mais une question fondamentale demeure, relève le quotidien dakarois : aura-t-il la patience d'attendre l'échéance normale ? Ou cherchera-t-il à accélérer le calendrier politique en imposant un nouveau rapport de force institutionnel ? C'est précisément là que réside le principal risque pour la stabilité du pays, pointe WalfQuotidien. Car lorsque deux légitimités issues du même camp cessent de cohabiter, le système tout entier peut entrer dans une logique de confrontation permanente. Le Sénégal, longtemps présenté comme une démocratie stable dans une région secouée par les crises institutionnelles, entre peut-être dans une phase de fortes turbulences. » Et cela pourrait commencer très vite avec la formation du nouveau gouvernement : « Quid des ministres à nommer ? », s'interroge en effet Aujourd'hui à Ouagadougou. « Seront-ils issus pour la plupart du Pastef dont est toujours membre le président Faye ou bien seront-ils des fidèles de ce dernier sans lien avec le parti ? Et encore, et si Diomaye Faye se piquait de vouloir dissoudre l'Assemblée nationale ? Il renverrait alors les Sénégalais aux urnes, espérant obtenir une majorité, mais il prendrait un gros risque, car si jamais le Pastef revenait majoritaire, non seulement 2029 serait perdu d'avance pour lui, mais Sonko serait incontestablement le deus ex machina politique du Sénégal. »

Le Sénégal se réveille ce matin avec un nouveau Premier ministre et dans les prochaines heures, on devrait connaitre le nouveau président de l'Assemblée nationale… Les cartes politiques sont donc rebattues. On commence par le nouveau premier ministre : « Après Sonko le tribun, Lo le technicien à la primature » : c'est ainsi que le site Seneplus qualifie Ahmadou Al Aminou Mohamed Lo, qui occupait auparavant le poste de ministre de l'Agenda national de Transformation Sénégal 2050. Le nouveau chef du gouvernement « est présenté comme un expert de tous les circuits financiers nationaux et internationaux, pointe Seneplus. Un profil stratégique dans un contexte où le Sénégal doit gérer une situation budgétaire difficile tout en poursuivant ses ambitions. » « Un économiste à la Primature », titre Le Soleil. « Le Président de la République confie ainsi l'exécutif à un haut commis de l'État rompu aux questions monétaires et financières, présent au cœur du gouvernement depuis le premier jour de la nouvelle ère. Spécialiste reconnu de la macroéconomie, de la régulation bancaire, des marchés financiers et de la finance islamique, Ahmadou Al Aminou Mohamed Lo compte parmi les principaux artisans de la mise en marche de la nouvelle gouvernance. » À lire aussiSénégal : Ahmadou Al Aminou Mohamed Lo nommé Premier ministre après le limogeage d'Ousmane Sonko Sonko président… de l'Assemblée nationale ? Alors, « le nouveau Premier ministre du Sénégal connu : Diomaye passe à l'offensive », relève Xalima. En effet, précise Dakar Actu, c'est ce mardi matin que l'Assemblée nationale se réunit : « L'ordre du jour porte sur la réintégration du député Ousmane Sonko ainsi que sur l'élection d'un nouveau président de l'Assemblée nationale. (…) Une séance qui s'annonce donc décisive dans le nouveau réaménagement institutionnel, après le limogeage du Premier ministre Sonko. » « Ousmane Sonko est-il en route vers le perchoir ? », s'interroge Afrik.com. « L'objectif du parti Pastef est de répliquer à la décision de Bassirou Diomaye Faye en installant son leader historique à la tête du pouvoir législatif. Libéré de la discipline gouvernementale, Ousmane Sonko disposerait alors d'une tribune stratégique pour peser sur le budget, les commissions d'enquête et le calendrier des réformes. » D'autant, rappelle Afrik.com, que « le Pastef dispose d'un levier puissant avec une large majorité de 130 sièges sur 165, acquise lors des élections législatives de novembre 2024. » Toutefois, tempère le site panafricain, « une inconnue de taille subsiste concernant la légalité de cette opération. Plusieurs juristes et figures politiques contestent le droit d'Ousmane Sonko à reprendre son écharpe de député. Les anciens parlementaires Cheikhou Oumar Sy et Théodore Chérif Monteil rappellent que la loi sénégalaise considère généralement le remplacement par un suppléant comme définitif pour toute la durée de la législature. La séance de ce mardi s'annonce donc électrique. Si la réintégration d'Ousmane Sonko est validée, le Sénégal entrera dans une forme de cohabitation inédite. Le chef de l'État composera alors avec une majorité parlementaire fidèle à son principal rival politique. » À lire aussiSénégal : l'Assemblée nationale doit se réunir en plénière pour élire son nouveau président Objectif 2029 Et dans ce contexte, analyse WalfQuotidien, « l'horizon de la présidentielle de 2029 devient déjà l'obsession centrale. Ousmane Sonko apparaît plus que jamais déterminé à accéder à la magistrature suprême. Sa majorité parlementaire a déjà engagé des réformes du dispositif électoral perçues par certains comme destinées à lever les obstacles qui avaient empêché sa candidature en 2024. Mais une question fondamentale demeure, relève le quotidien dakarois : aura-t-il la patience d'attendre l'échéance normale ? Ou cherchera-t-il à accélérer le calendrier politique en imposant un nouveau rapport de force institutionnel ? C'est précisément là que réside le principal risque pour la stabilité du pays, pointe WalfQuotidien. Car lorsque deux légitimités issues du même camp cessent de cohabiter, le système tout entier peut entrer dans une logique de confrontation permanente. Le Sénégal, longtemps présenté comme une démocratie stable dans une région secouée par les crises institutionnelles, entre peut-être dans une phase de fortes turbulences. » Et cela pourrait commencer très vite avec la formation du nouveau gouvernement : « Quid des ministres à nommer ? », s'interroge en effet Aujourd'hui à Ouagadougou. « Seront-ils issus pour la plupart du Pastef dont est toujours membre le président Faye ou bien seront-ils des fidèles de ce dernier sans lien avec le parti ? Et encore, et si Diomaye Faye se piquait de vouloir dissoudre l'Assemblée nationale ? Il renverrait alors les Sénégalais aux urnes, espérant obtenir une majorité, mais il prendrait un gros risque, car si jamais le Pastef revenait majoritaire, non seulement 2029 serait perdu d'avance pour lui, mais Sonko serait incontestablement le deus ex machina politique du Sénégal. »

L'île de Cuba n'est peut-être plus tout à fait maîtresse de son destin tant le voisin américain accentue, semaines après semaines, la pression sur le régime. Après la politique de l'asphyxie économique, voilà le levier judiciaire actionné contre Raul Castro, l'ex-dirigeant cubain. Le régime castriste peut-il encore tenir ? Quid des Cubains ? Comment vivent-ils ou survivent-ils privés de carburant, d'électricité pour beaucoup, et de possibilité d'envisager l'avenir sereinement ?

C dans l'air du 20 mai 2026 - Trump tergiverse... La Chine en profite ?Alors que Donald Trump continue de multiplier les menaces et les revirements face à l'Iran, annonçant lundi avoir suspendu une vaste attaque contre Téhéran à la demande des monarchies du Golfe, tout en affirmant que l'armée américaine reste prête à lancer « une attaque totale » à tout moment, Vladimir Poutine est reçu en grande pompe à Pékin aujourd'hui par Xi Jinping, quelques jours seulement après la visite du président des États-Unis en Chine. Pour cette 25ᵉ visite de Vladimir Poutine en Chine, le dossier prioritaire reste celui de l'énergie. Affaiblie par les sanctions occidentales, la Russie cherche à renforcer encore ses débouchés vers l'Asie. Moscou espère notamment convaincre Pékin d'augmenter ses importations de pétrole et de gaz russes. Au cœur des discussions : le gigantesque projet de gazoduc Power of Siberia 2, long de 7 000 kilomètres, qui doit relier la Russie à la Chine via la Mongolie. Selon les estimations, il pourrait acheminer jusqu'à 50 milliards de mètres cubes de gaz par an, soit près de 12 % des besoins chinois.Dans les médias américains, cette succession de visites diplomatiques est largement analysée comme une démonstration de puissance entre les grandes capitales mondiales. Avec une Chine qui apparaît de plus en plus comme un « coacteur » du système international et qui assume désormais ouvertement ses ambitions stratégiques, notamment autour de Taïwan.Car en parallèle, Pékin accélère aussi son effort militaire. Le budget de la défense chinoise doit encore augmenter de 7 % en 2026 pour atteindre près de 239 milliards d'euros. Un montant certes très inférieur à celui des États-Unis, mais largement supérieur à ceux de la Russie, du Japon ou encore de l'Inde. Une Inde qui vient justement de signer une commande record de 114 avions Rafale auprès de Dassault Aviation.Et ce contrat irrite particulièrement Pékin. Depuis plusieurs mois, le Rafale français est devenu un symbole des tensions stratégiques en Asie. Entre les démonstrations militaires chinoises, les affrontements aériens entre l'Inde et le Pakistan et les discussions autour d'éventuelles ventes françaises à Taïwan, l'avion de chasse français se retrouve au cœur d'une bataille d'influence. Selon un rapport d'une commission américaine révélé par Reuters, la Chine mènerait même des campagnes de désinformation sur les réseaux sociaux pour tenter de discréditer l'appareil français depuis son utilisation par l'armée indienne face à des équipements chinois déployés au Pakistan.Alors, quelle est la stratégie américaine contre l'Iran ? Donald Trump est-il affaibli face à la Chine ? Quels sont les enjeux de la visite de Vladimir Poutine à Pékin ? Quid de l'Europe ? Que se passe-t-il autour du Rafale ? Enfin, le chef du gouvernement espagnol, dirigeant européen le plus critique envers Donald Trump, s'est rendu quatre fois en Chine en trois ans. Parallèlement, l'arrivée d'entreprises chinoises de pointe dans la péninsule Ibérique s'est nettement accélérée ces derniers temps. Quelles conséquences pour l'UE ?Nos experts :- Guillaume LAGANE - Spécialiste des questions de Défense, enseignant à Sciences Po- Anthony BELLANGER - Éditorialiste à Franceinfo TV et spécialiste des questions internationales- Patricia ALLEMONIERE - Grand reporter, spécialiste des questions internationales- Général Patrick DUTARTRE - Général de l'armée de l'Air et de l'Espace, ancien pilote de chasse- Sonia DRIDI (en duplex de Washington) - Journaliste, correspondante aux Etats-Unis pour plusieurs médias, dont Europe 1 et Arte.

Aujourd'hui je suis heureux de vous partager le tout premier enregistrement en public du podcast consacré aux violences en protestantisme, enregistré le 14 avril 2026 dans les locaux des éditions Biblio !Nous savons aujourd'hui que personne n'est à l'abri et que nos institutions protestantes ne sont pas toujours des lieux protecteurs. Pire, à priori, l'Eglise serait un espace qui connaîtrait davantage de conflits violents que d'autres groupes associatifs. Les chrétiens s'efforceraient de les occulter, par manque de connaissances des sciences humaines, par une absence de formation ou sous prétexte que les conflits ne doivent ou ne peuvent pas exister en Église. Mais l'Église recèle aussi un potentiel de ressources qui constitue autant d'atouts pour contrer les expressions de violence.

Aujourd'hui je suis heureux de vous partager le temps de questions/réponses qui a suivi le premier enregistrement en public du podcast consacré aux violences en protestantisme, enregistré le 14 avril 2026 dans les locaux des éditions Biblio !Nous savons aujourd'hui que personne n'est à l'abri et que nos institutions protestantes ne sont pas toujours des lieux protecteurs. Pire, à priori, l'Eglise serait un espace qui connaîtrait davantage de conflits violents que d'autres groupes associatifs. Les chrétiens s'efforceraient de les occulter, par manque de connaissances des sciences humaines, par une absence de formation ou sous prétexte que les conflits ne doivent ou ne peuvent pas exister en Église. Mais l'Église recèle aussi un potentiel de ressources qui constitue autant d'atouts pour contrer les expressions de violence.

C'est le titre d'un long article de Jeune Afrique qui revient heure par heure, ville par ville, sur les attaques qui ont ensanglanté le pays samedi dernier. « Du nord au centre du Mali, au moins six des plus importantes villes du pays, dont la capitale, Bamako, se réveillent ce samedi 25 avril aux prises avec une offensive massive et coordonnée d'une ampleur inédite depuis le début du conflit, en 2012. Partout, relate le site panafricain, des milliers d'hommes en armes déferlent dans les rues, prenant pour cible les symboles du pouvoir et de l'armée : casernes, commissariats, gouvernorats, aéroports… Les combats se livrent en pleine rue, parfois à l'arme lourde et au mortier. » Kati: au cœur du pouvoir Et les djihadistes du JNIM et les rebelles du FLA, dans une alliance inédite, osent même frapper au cœur du pouvoir militaire, dans Kati, la ville garnison à la lisière de Bamako. « Aux premières lueurs du jour, poursuit Jeune Afrique, un homme au volant d'un véhicule kamikaze bourré d'explosifs fonce sur la résidence du ministre de la Défense, Sadio Camara, et enclenche sa charge. Le souffle est si puissant que tout le bâtiment s'effondre, emportant une mosquée attenante et près d'une trentaine d'autres maisons. Le ministre, sa deuxième femme, l'un de ses enfants, son neveu, ainsi que les gardes présents, sont tués. » Les combats feront rage à Kati toute la journée. « C'est dans ce contexte particulièrement instable que Modibo Koné – patron de la Sécurité d'État, les services de renseignement – aurait été blessé », relate encore Jeune Afrique. Et « l'inquiétude ne cesse de grandir au sein de l'armée. Si le décès du général Camara est confirmé, la situation n'en reste pas moins confuse. La même interrogation concerne Assimi Goïta, dont le domicile se trouve à quelques centaines de mètres de celui de Sadio Camara ». Quid d'Assimi Goïta ? En effet, « incertitude sur le sort d'Assimi Goïta », titre Afrik.com. « Depuis le déclenchement des attaques, aucune apparition publique ni communication officielle du chef de la junte n'a été enregistrée. Selon des sources sécuritaires, il aurait été exfiltré vers un site sécurisé, probablement un camp des forces spéciales à proximité de la capitale. Est-il toujours en vie ? » Hier, c'est le premier ministre, le Général Abdoulaye Maïga, qui s'est exprimé. « Il a expliqué, rapporte Sahel Tribune à Bamako, que les assaillants avaient pour objectif de semer la peur et le doute, de briser la cohésion nationale et d'affaiblir la détermination collective. Selon lui, “ces objectifs ont échoué“, car la population n'a pas eu peur, la cohésion nationale s'est renforcée et la détermination est plus grande que jamais. »   Pour sa part, l'AES, l'Alliance des États du Sahel, qui regroupe le Mali, le Burkina Faso et le Niger, a dénoncé hier un « complot monstrueux soutenu par des ennemis de la lutte de libération du Sahel. » Le communiqué, publié notamment par le site Maliweb, affirme que « le dessein macabre de ces bourreaux de la paix a été mis en échec grâce à une riposte professionnelle, courageuse et déterminée par les forces armées maliennes ». « Affligeante faillite » Ledjely, à Conakry, s'inscrit en faux : « Les autorités maliennes doivent accepter de voir la réalité en face, s'exclame le site guinéen. Car, au regard de leur affligeante faillite incarnée par la tragédie que le pays a vécu samedi, elles doivent nous épargner les excuses et boucs émissaires habituels. A minima, elles doivent juste admettre leur échec. (…) Un échec qui ne résulte pas nécessairement d'une supériorité militaire de l'ennemi, relève encore Ledjely. Mais qui est aussi et surtout celui de la méthode et de l'approche de la junte malienne. Une junte qui travaille davantage à la confiscation du pouvoir qu'à l'authentique lutte contre l'insécurité. » Vers une guerre civile ? Enfin que peut-il se passer maintenant au Mali ? Pour Michaël Ayari, analyste pour International Crisis Group, interrogé par Le Point Afrique, on pourrait assister à « une progression graduelle de l'emprise djihadiste, à la multiplication d'alliances locales opportunistes et à une tendance des acteurs extérieurs à privilégier des réponses militaires. Cette dynamique pourrait en outre aggraver les fractures communautaires et conduire à une véritable guerre civile ».  De plus, poursuit Michaël Ayari, « le principal risque est la régionalisation du conflit malien. Le Mali partage de longues frontières avec l'Algérie et la Mauritanie ; toute dégradation dans le Nord peut provoquer des déplacements de populations, des incidents transfrontaliers, des frappes mal contrôlées ou des tensions militaires directes ». 

 16 A little while, and now you shall not see me; and again a little while, and you shall see me: because I go to the Father.Modicum, et jam non videbitis me; et iterum modicum, et videbitis me : quia vado ad Patrem. 17 Then some of the disciples said one to another: What is this that he saith to us: A little while, and you shall not see me; and again a little while, and you shall see me, and, because I go to the Father?Dixerunt ergo ex discipulis ejus ad invicem : Quid est hoc quod dicit nobis : Modicum, et non videbitis me; et iterum modicum, et videbitis me, et quia vado ad Patrem? 18 They said therefore: What is this that he saith, A little while? we know not what he speaketh.Dicebant ergo : Quid est hoc quod dicit : Modicum? nescimus quid loquitur. 19 And Jesus knew that they had a mind to ask him; and he said to them: Of this do you inquire among yourselves, because I said: A little while, and you shall not see me; and again a little while, and you shall see me?Cognovit autem Jesus, quia volebant eum interrogare, et dixit eis : De hoc quaeritis inter vos quia dixi : Modicum, et non videbitis me; et iterum modicum, et videbitis me. 20 Amen, amen I say to you, that you shall lament and weep, but the world shall rejoice; and you shall be made sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy.Amen, amen dico vobis : quia plorabitis, et flebitis vos, mundus autem gaudebit; vos autem contristabimini, sed tristitia vestra vertetur in gaudium. 21 A woman, when she is in labour, hath sorrow, because her hour is come; but when she hath brought forth the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world.Mulier cum parit, tristitiam habet, quia venit hora ejus; cum autem pepererit puerum, jam non meminit pressurae propter gaudium, quia natus est homo in mundum. 22 So also you now indeed have sorrow; but I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice; and your joy no man shall take from you.Et vos igitur nunc quidem tristitiam habetis, iterum autem videbo vos, et gaudebit cor vestrum : et gaudium vestrum nemo tollet a vobis.

Deux jours avant l'évènement, une mock draft pour se mettre en jambes. Cyprien Delmas et Jean-Michel Bougeard choisissent à tour de rôle pour ce 1e tour. Le coureur Jeremiyah Love sera t'il choisi dans le top 10 ? Quid du meilleur joueur toute position confondue : le safety Caleb Downs. Trente deux choix et trois échanges animent cet épisode.Bonne écoute Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Rejoignez la communauté iWeek et soutenez-nous sur patreon.com/iweek !Voici l'épisode 274 d'iWeek (la semaine Apple).Le MacBook Neo va-t-il doubler les parts de marché du Mac ?Enregistré en streaming, mardi 14 avril 2026 à 18h30, enregistrement accessible en direct pour nos soutiens Patreon. Désormais, eux seuls peuvent suivre le streaming de chaque épisode grâce à un lien que nous leur envoyons chaque semaine. Faites comme eux et profitez du chat, intervenez en visio en cliquant sur le bouton sous le lecteur vidéo. Quant au replay vidéo, sans le bonus, il continue d'être disponible pour tous sur YouTube.Présentation : Benjamin Vincent, journaliste, producteur et présentateur de l'autre podcast de référence, Les Voix de la Tech.Avec la participation de : Elie Abitbol (ex--MCS à Nice, Cannes et Aix-en-Provence et ex-président des Apple Premium Resellers en France), Dominic Di Vitale (vidéaste, monteur vidéo, formateur certifié sur DaVinci Resolve), Thibaut Vanheule (organisateur de salons grand public basé à Lille) et Cyril (créateur de contenu, “Les tests de Cyril“ sur YouTube et Instagram).Au sommaire de cet épisode 274 : le MacBook Neo incarne-t-il une évolution majeure de la stratégie d'Apple : en clair, l'entreprise a-t-elle enfin décidé de renoncer à ses marges de - minimum - 37 / 38% pour augmenter ses parts de marché ? Grace au MacBook Neo, celles-ci pourraient doubler en dix ans.L'info de la semaine, c'est le coup de tonnerre que représente l'acquisition de Globalstar par... Amazon. L'opérateur de satellites, dont 20% appartient à Apple, passe sous le giron de Jeff Bezos et s'engage à poursuivre la collaboration avec le fabricant de l'iPhone autour des services que propose l'iPhone comme les SOS d'urgence par satellite. Quid à moyen et long terme ? On pense notamment aux SMS et appels par satellite alors qu'un rapprochement ave Starlink d'Elon Musk semblait à nouveau envisageable.Ne manquez pas, en tout début d'épisode, notre “retour sur...“ consacré à l'autorisation du mode conduite automatique (FSD) de Tesla aux Pays-Bas. Elle pourrait, dans les semaines qui viennent, être étendue à toute l'Union européenne.Enfin, dans le JT de la semaine, vous constaterez que l'iPhone Ultra (pliant) est déjà sorti... chez Huawei et uniquement en Chine mais quand même... Le Pura X Max semble être le clone exact du futur iPhone pliant qui doit être lancé officiellement en septembre.Pas de bonus exclusif cette semaine : il sera de retour dans 2 semaines, après l'émission que Benjamin réalisera depuis le NAB 2026 à Las Vegas, la semaine prochaine !Rendez-vous donc, la semaine prochaine, mercredi 22 avril 2026 à partir de 18h30 pour l'épisode 275. On compte sur vous !Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Découvrez également la double offre bienvenue de notre partenaire Winamax, qui donne à tous les nouveaux joueurs deux bonus exceptionnels :→ Bonus 1 : Winamax te rembourse ton premier pari en CASH si celui-ci est perdant, dans la limite de 100 € (Conditions de l'offre sont disponibles sur site)→ Bonus 2 : 10 € supplémentaires en cash avec le code promo ORLF1Vous pouvez vous inscrire sur Winamax et renseigner le code ORLF1 au moment de votre premier dépôt via ce lien : https://www.winamax.fr/registration/landing/offre_bienvenue?banid=69973 Conditions :Offre réservée uniquement aux nouveaux joueurs.Les 10 € vous seront crédités une fois que vous aurez finalisé votre inscription et effectué votre 1er dépôt. Cette offre n'est valable qu'une seule fois par utilisateur, terminal (ordinateur, tablette ou mobile), foyer ou compte bancaire. Elle est réservée aux joueurs n'ayant jamais créé de compte sur Winamax (y compris un compte qui a été fermé depuis).Ces deux offres sont cumulables.Rappels :Les jeux d'argent sont strictement interdits aux mineurs D'autre part, ils peuvent être dangereux : pertes d'argent, conflits familiaux, addiction… Retrouvez nos conseils sur joueurs-info-service.fr (09 74 75 13 13 - appel non surtaxéCette semaine dans On refait la F1 :McLaren est-elle en train de préparer le coup du siècle ?Après avoir récupéré les cerveaux de Red Bull… l'écurie britannique vise-t-elle désormais Max Verstappen ?Le départ de Gianpiero Lambiase, l'homme de confiance de Max, est-il un simple transfert… ou le premier domino d'un plan beaucoup plus ambitieux ?Pendant ce temps-là, Red Bull se vide de sa substance…Newey, Marshall, Wheatley… et maintenant Lambiase !L'écurie championne du monde est-elle en train de s'effondrer de l'intérieur ?Quid de Mercedes, peut-elle vraiment se passer de Verstappen ?Avec comme fanas du paddock cette semaine, Guillaume Pommier, Cyril Drevet, Jerome Hermez, Nicolas Sabatier présenté par Olivier Frigara !Rendez-vous chaque lundi, qu'il y ait Grand Prix ou non sur YouTube pour découvrir une nouvelle émission !

Où l'on parle de Succession, mais aussi d'intransigeance.

L'OL respire enfin ! Une victoire pas franchement maîtrisée, mais essentielle face à Lorient (2-0). Les Lyonnais restent dans la course à la Ligue des champions… et ça nous donne une idée : on prépare déjà la saison prochaine. Le jeu est simple : dans cet effectif, qui on garde, qui on vend, et qui fait encore débat ? Quel avenir pour le chef d'orchestre Paulo Fonseca ? Endrick, un nouveau prêt possible ou retour express au Real ? Les fins de contrat : Tolisso, Maitland-Niles, Tagliafico — faut-il tourner la page ? Quid des fortes valeurs marchandes : Fofana, Nuamah — garder ou encaisser ? Que faire avec Pavel Sulc : construire autour de lui ou profiter de la hype pour bien le vendre ? On passe tout l'effectif au crible : les indispensables, les indésirables, les grandes décisions à venir. Avec Aurélien Tiercin, Edward Jay, Loïc Lefort et Frédéric Guerra, agent de joueurs.

Les journalistes et experts de RFI répondent également à vos questions sur les négociations attendues au Pakistan entre les Iraniens et Américains et la position d'Israël dans la trêve annoncée par Donald Trump.   Trêve en Iran : à quand la réouverture du détroit d'Ormuz ?   En échange de l'arrêt des bombardements américains, l'Iran s'est engagé à rouvrir le détroit d'Ormuz, où une grande partie du pétrole et du gaz mondial est bloqué. Comment va se dérouler la réouverture de cette voie maritime ? Comment la sécurité des navires sera-t-elle garantie ? Quid du droit de péage que le régime iranien souhaite imposer ?  Trêve en Iran : la médiation pakistanaise sera-t-elle concluante ?    Alors qu'un cessez-le-feu de 15 jours a été annoncé entre les États-Unis et l'Iran, des délégations américaines et iraniennes sont attendues à Islamabad, au Pakistan, pour des négociations directes. Téhéran a présenté un plan en dix points censé servir de base aux discussions. Que contient exactement ce texte ? Ces nouvelles discussions ont-elles vraiment une chance d'aboutir alors que les deux pays n'ont jamais réussi à s'entendre ? Comment le Pakistan peut-il influencer les négociations ?   Avec Lyna Ouandjeli, chercheuse à l'Institut européen d'études sur le Moyen-Orient et l'Afrique du Nord.       Trêve en Iran : comment se positionne Israël ?   Le Premier ministre Benyamin Netanyahu a affirmé qu'Israël soutenait « la décision du président Trump de suspendre les frappes contre l'Iran pendant deux semaines », mais que cette trêve n'incluait pas le Liban. Pourtant, le Premier ministre pakistanais Shehbaz Sharif, médiateur dans le conflit, avait annoncé que le cessez-le-feu s'appliquait « partout, y compris au Liban ». Benyamin Netanyahu soutient-il réellement la trêve ? Pourquoi Israël continue de bombarder le Liban ? Avec Frédérique Misslin, correspondante permanente de RFI à Jérusalem.

36 Now whilst they were speaking these things, Jesus stood in the midst of them, and saith to them: Peace be to you; it is I, fear not.Dum autem haec loquuntur, stetit Jesus in medio eorum, et dicit eis : Pax vobis : ego sum, nolite timere. 37 But they being troubled and frightened, supposed that they saw a spirit.Conturbati vero et conterriti, existimabant se spiritum videre. 38 And he said to them: Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?Et dixit eis : Quid turbati estis, et cogitationes ascendunt in corda vestra? 39 See my hands and feet, that it is I myself; handle, and see: for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as you see me to have.videte manus meas, et pedes, quia ego ipse sum; palpate et videte, quia spiritus carnem et ossa non habet, sicut me videtis habere. 40 And when he had said this, he shewed them his hands and feet.Et cum hoc dixisset, ostendit eis manus et pedes. 41 But while they yet believed not, and wondered for joy, he said: Have you any thing to eat?Adhuc autem illis non credentibus, et mirantibus prae gaudio, dixit : Habetis hic aliquid quod manducetur? 42 And they offered him a piece of a broiled fish, and a honeycomb.At illi obtulerunt ei partem piscis assi et favum mellis. 43 And when he had eaten before them, taking the remains, he gave to them.Et cum manducasset coram eis, sumens reliquias dedit eis. 44 And he said to them: These are the words which I spoke to you, while I was yet with you, that all things must needs be fulfilled, which are written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.Et dixit ad eos : Haec sunt verba quae locutus sum ad vos cum adhuc essem vobiscum, quoniam necesse est impleri omnia quae scripta sunt in lege Moysi, et prophetis, et Psalmis de me. 45 Then he opened their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures.Tunc aperuit illis sensum ut intelligerent Scripturas, 46 And he said to them: Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise again from the dead, the third day:et dixit eis : Quoniam sic scriptum est, et sic oportebat Christum pati, et resurgere a mortuis tertia die : 47 And that penance and remission of sins should be preached in his name, unto all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.et praedicari in nomine ejus poenitentiam, et remissionem peccatorum in omnes gentes, incipientibus ab Jerosolyma.

Ce jeudi paraît un rapport de près de 300 pages, issu de deux ans d'enquête auprès des victimes civiles du Burkina Faso. L'ONG de défense des droits de l'Homme Human Rights Watch a recueilli des centaines de témoignages de Burkinabè ayant subi entre 2023 et 2025 des attaques terroristes du Jnim, mais aussi la répression des forces armées burkinabè. Répression, notamment, contre la communauté peule. Les 57 incidents documentés par l'ONG illustrent la crise profonde et violente que traverse ce pays, sous la coupe d'une junte militaire qui n'arrive pas à endiguer la vague jihadiste. Une junte qui réprime violemment les supposés complices des terroristes. Avec ce rapport, qui recense 1 800 victimes civiles en deux ans, l'ONG espère une réaction de la communauté internationale, et un début de judiciarisation de ce qu'elle qualifie de « crimes de guerre » et de « crimes contre l'humanité ». Ilaria Allegrozzi, co-autrice de ce rapport, est la grande invitée Afrique Matin de RFI. RFI : « Personne ne pourra s'échapper », c'est le titre de votre rapport sur les crimes commis au Burkina Faso entre 2023 et 2025. « Personne ne pourra s'échapper », qui dit cela exactement ? Avant de vous dire qui dit ça, je reviens sur le titre qui est assez évocateur dans le sens où vraiment ça renvoie à une image symbolique de la guerre et pourtant réelle où personne n'est à l'abri, où les populations civiles sont piégées entre des violences avec des abus venant de tous les côtés. Maintenant, qui dit « Personne ne pourra s'échapper » ? C'est le président du Burkina Faso lui-même qui, pendant une réunion avec les chefs peuls en février 2023, avait dit que l'épicentre du terrorisme se situait au sein des communautés peuls et avait, de façon directe, menacé de tuer les peuls qui collaborent avec les groupes armés jihadistes. Ils les ont alors ciblés dans des massacres, les ont forcés à quitter leurs terres. Et ce schéma d'abus envers la communauté peule constitue une forme de nettoyage ethnique, d'après nous. Vous avez donc enquêté sur une période 2023-2025 avec un recensement de 57 attaques contre des civils. Quid de la difficulté d'enquêter dans un pays où la terreur règne, notamment la terreur de parler ? Oui, vous avez raison. En fait, les pertes civiles dans les conflits qui frappent le Burkina Faso ne sont pas connues parce qu'il n'y a pas de mécanisme pour recenser les victimes. Et beaucoup d'incidents passent inaperçus. Aussi à cause du climat de peur, de terreur et de répression instauré par cette junte militaire qui a muselé la dissidence, l'opposition, les médias, cela a empêché la circulation des informations sur la situation sécuritaire. J'ajoute également que la propagande gouvernementale, mais la propagande aussi du Jnim empêchent d'avoir vraiment une vision claire de ce qui se passe au Burkina Faso, y compris de documenter les incidents. Au moins 10 000 morts civils recensés par l'ONG Acled depuis 2016 ou même 1 800 morts recensés dans votre rapport : ce sont des chiffres qui sont très certainement en-deçà de la réalité, mais qui sont éloquents… Oui, justement, 10 600 morts selon Acled depuis 2016. De notre côté, 57 incidents documentés ont engendré la mort de 1 800 civils, dont 1 200 tués par les forces de sécurité et les VDP [Volontaires pour la défense de la patrie, supplétifs civils des forces de sécurité, NDLR]. Qu'est-ce que ça veut dire ? Cela reflète trois réalités. La première, on n'a pas été en mesure de documenter tous les incidents, la deuxième c'est que les forces de sécurité et leurs supplétifs VDP semblent être plus violents que le Jnim. Et troisièmement, ça pourrait aussi être une tendance régionale dans le sens où même au Mali, l'année passée, Acled avait souligné que les forces de sécurité avaient tué plus de civils que le Jnim. Ces 57 cas que vous documentez dans votre rapport, 57 attaques, aucune n'a fait l'objet d'enquêtes et encore moins de condamnations de la part des autorités burkinabè. Qu'est-ce que cela signifie ? Ça veut dire qu'en fait, il y a un double discours entre « on va faire des enquêtes » - c'est ce que disait pour un certain nombre de cas les autorités burkinabè et le président Traoré - et le fait qu'on ne voit jamais d'instruction et encore moins de procès dans ces exactions contre des civils ? Au Burkina Faso, on est dans un contexte d'impunité généralisée grandissante, où aucun membre des forces de sécurité burkinabè n'a fait l'objet de poursuites, ni amené devant les tribunaux pour des présumés violations des droits humains commises dans le cadre des opérations de contre-terrorisme. Donc, vous voyez que les voies de recours pour les victimes au niveau national sont très limitées. Les enquêtes encore plus. Et aussi, au niveau régional, les voies de recours pour les victimes deviennent de plus en plus limitées et restreintes, parce que le Burkina a quitté la Communauté économique des États de l'Afrique de l'Ouest (Cédéao) et, par conséquent, a privé ses citoyens de la possibilité de saisir la Cour de justice de la Cédéao. Est-ce que vous n'avez pas l'impression que la communauté internationale se désintéresse, ou en tout cas détourne son regard, de ce qui se passe au Burkina Faso ? Bien sûr. La crise au Burkina Faso est complètement passée sous silence. Pourquoi ? Parce qu'il n'y a d'intérêt, il n'y a pas d'enjeux ? Je pense qu'après le coup d'État militaire de 2022, les partenaires internationaux du Burkina Faso se sont complètement désengagés et au lieu de trouver des voies de sortie ou des dialogues avec les autorités militaires, ont préféré laisser le Burkina Faso à son sort et n'ont pas porté l'attention nécessaire à cette crise. C'est inquiétant ? C'est très inquiétant ! Mais je pense qu'avec une couverture médiatique plus importante, une mobilisation des victimes avec des plaintes des ONG, il est possible d'obtenir des résultats, notamment pousser le Procureur de la Cour pénale à agir et à ouvrir un examen préliminaire sur les crimes commis par tous les camps. ► Rapport sur les Crimes contre l'humanité commis par tous les camps au Burkina Faso

C dans l'air du 1er avril 2026 - Trump menace de « quitter l'Iran »...et l'OTAN !Plus d'un mois après le début de la guerre au Moyen-Orient, alors que la fermeture du détroit d'Ormuz par le régime des Mollahs entraîne un ralentissement de l'économie mondiale, le président des États-Unis s'en est pris aux Français « qui ne nous aident pas », aux Européens « incapables de se battre », au Royaume-Uni, ainsi qu'à l'OTAN « qui ne sert à rien »…Dans un message publié hier sur son réseau social, Donald Trump a même affirmé que la France avait refusé le survol de son territoire à des avions américains et s'était montrée « très peu coopérative » face à celui qu'il appelle « le boucher d'Iran » : « les États-Unis s'en souviendront », a-t-il ajouté. Le président américain a également déclaré que son pays quitterait l'Iran « très bientôt », « dans deux ou trois semaines », laissant la France et les autres pays « se débrouiller tout seuls » avec le détroit d'Ormuz.Un peu plus tard, sur Fox News, les États-Unis, par la voix de Marco Rubio, ont par ailleurs menacé de réévaluer leur engagement dans l'OTAN face au refus de certains alliés européens de soutenir leurs opérations militaires. « L'OTAN fonctionne à sens unique », a assuré le secrétaire d'État. « Nous allons devoir réexaminer cette relation. Il faudra l'examiner attentivement après la fin du conflit. »L'OTAN est en réalité dans le viseur des États-Unis depuis plusieurs mois — c'est l'une des obsessions de Donald Trump. Mais envisage-t-il sérieusement un retrait des États-Unis de l'OTAN ? Et quel rôle joue la Russie dans cette guerre au Moyen-Orient ?En marge d'une réunion du G7, le 26 mars dernier, la cheffe de la diplomatie de l'Union européenne, Kaja Kallas, a affirmé l'existence d'une aide russe à l'Iran dans le cadre du conflit. « Nous constatons que la Russie aide l'Iran sur le plan du renseignement pour cibler des Américains, pour tuer des Américains, et qu'elle fournit également des drones afin que ce pays puisse attaquer ses voisins ainsi que des bases militaires américaines », a-t-elle déclaré. Le président ukrainien Volodymyr Zelensky, lui aussi, se dit persuadé de cette aide de Moscou à Téhéran et affirme détenir des « preuves irréfutables ».Parallèlement, en réponse à l'affolement des marchés mondiaux — qui a déjà provoqué des hausses de prix à la pompe, aux États-Unis comme en Europe —, Donald Trump a décidé, mi-mars, de lever une partie des sanctions américaines sur le pétrole russe pour une durée de trente jours. La mesure concerne les barils stockés sur des navires depuis la mise en place des sanctions. Les Européens ont critiqué cette décision et maintenu leurs propres sanctions, alors que, sur le terrain, depuis dix jours, l'Ukraine multiplie les attaques contre les infrastructures clés de l'exportation de pétrole brut russe. L'objectif de Kiev est de limiter le surcroît de recettes que Moscou tire de la flambée des cours.Alors, qui sont les gagnants et les perdants de la guerre au Moyen-Orient ? Donald Trump va-t-il finalement opter pour une sortie rapide du conflit ? Quid de l'OTAN ? Enfin, Emmanuel Macron a convoqué ces dernières semaines plusieurs conseils de défense : comment fonctionne ce dispositif ?Nos experts :- Général François CHAUVANCY - Rédacteur en chef de la revue Défense de l'Union-IHEDN, l'Institut des hautes études de défense nationale- Frédéric ENCEL - Docteur en géopolitique, maître de conférences à Sciences Po Paris et à la Paris School of Business, auteur de La guerre mondiale n'aura pas lieu aux Editions Odile Jacob- Laure MANDEVILLE - grand reporter au Figaro- Mélissa BELL - journaliste, correspondante à Paris pour CNN- Marie BILLON (en duplex de Londres )- correspondante en Grande-Bretagne pour la radio RTL

47 The chief priests therefore, and the Pharisees, gathered a council, and said: What do we, for this man doth many miracles?Collegerunt ergo pontifices et pharisaei concilium, et dicebant : Quid faciamus, quia hic homo multa signa facit? 48 If we let him alone so, all will believe in him; and the Romans will come, and take away our place and nation.Si dimittimus eum sic, omnes credent in eum, et venient Romani, et tollent nostrum locum, et gentem. 49 But one of them, named Caiphas, being the high priest that year, said to them: You know nothing.Unus autem ex ipsis, Caiphas nomine, cum esset pontifex anni illius, dixit eis : Vos nescitis quidquam, 50 Neither do you consider that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.nec cogitatis quia expedit vobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo, et non tota gens pereat. 51 And this he spoke not of himself: but being the high priest of that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for the nation.Hoc autem a semetipso non dixit : sed cum esset pontifex anni illius, prophetavit, quod Jesus moriturus erat pro gente, 52 And not only for the nation, but to gather together in one the children of God, that were dispersed.et non tantum pro gente, sed ut filios Dei, qui erant dispersi, congregaret in unum. 53 From that day therefore they devised to put him to death.Ab illo ergo die cogitaverunt ut interficerent eum. 54 Wherefore Jesus walked no more openly among the Jews; but he went into a country near the desert, unto a city that is called Ephrem, and there he abode with his disciples.Jesus ergo jam non in palam ambulabat apud Judaeos, sed abiit in regionem juxta desertum, in civitatem quae dicitur Ephrem, et ibi morabatur cum discipulis suis.

VERDI: Misa de Requiem (selec.) (Requiem e Kyrie, Dies Irae, Tuba mirum, Liber scriptus, Quid sum miser, Rex tremendae, Recordare, Ingemisco, Confutatis, Lacrymosa) (42.03). E. Mei (sop.), B. Fink (mez.), M. Schade (ten.), I D’Arcangelo (baj.), Coro Arnold Schönberg, Orq. Fil. de Viena. Dir.: N. Harnoncourt.Escuchar audio

We're back this week for an update on Carl's newborn experiences, car maintenance and more! Part one of Carl's stand-up special 'Another Round' is available to watch on Youtube on April 1st. Subscribe to https://www.youtube.com/@carldonnellycomedy to get it as soon as it's live! If you enjoy the podcast and want to support us while gaining access to full length episodes, videos and the WhatsApp community then head over to www.patreon.com/wearetvi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Au lendemain du 2e tour d'élections municipales qui ont vu la gauche conserver Paris, Marseille et Lyon, mais par ailleurs sans vainqueur clair, quelles enseignements peut-on tirer pour la prochaine présidentielle ? Quid de Édouard Philippe, Marine Le Pen, Jordan Bardella, Raphaël Glucksmann ou Olivier Faure ? Écoutez l'analyse de la constitutionnaliste Anne-Charlène Bezzina et de l'éditorialiste Alain Duhamel.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

14 Now about the midst of the feast, Jesus went up into the temple, and taught.Jam autem die festo mediante, ascendit Jesus in templum, et docebat. 15 And the Jews wondered, saying: How doth this man know letters, having never learned?Et mirabantur Judaei, dicentes : Quomodo hic litteras scit, cum non didicerit? 16 Jesus answered them, and said: My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.Respondit eis Jesus, et dixit : Mea doctrina non est mea, sed ejus qui misit me. 17 If any man do the will of him; he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.Si quis voluerit voluntatem ejus facere, cognoscet de doctrina, utrum ex Deo sit, an ego a meipso loquar. 18 He that speaketh of himself, seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh the glory of him that sent him, he is true, and there is no injustice in him.Qui a semetipso loquitur, gloriam propriam quaerit; qui autem quaerit gloriam ejus qui misit eum, hic verax est, et injustitia in illo non est. 19 Did Moses not give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth the law?Nonne Moyses dedit vobis legem : et nemo ex vobis facit legem? 20 Why seek you to kill me? The multitude answered, and said: Thou hast a devil; who seeketh to kill thee?Quid me quaeritis interficere? Respondit turba, et dixit : Daemonium habes : quis te quaeret interficere? 21 Jesus answered, and said to them: One work I have done; and you all wonder:Respondit Jesus et dixit eis : Unum opus feci, et omnes miramini : 22 Therefore, Moses gave you circumcision (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and on the sabbath day you circumcise a man.propterea Moyses dedit vobis circumcisionem ( non quia ex Moyse est, sed ex patribus), et in sabbato circumciditis hominem. 23 If a man receive circumcision on the sabbath day, that the law of Moses may not be broken; are you angry at me because I have healed the whole man on the sabbath day?Si circumcisionem accipit homo in sabbato, ut non solvatur lex Moysi : mihi indignamini quia totum hominem sanum feci in sabbato? 24 Judge not according to the appearance, but judge just judgment.Nolite judicare secundum faciem, sed justum judicium judicate. 25 Some therefore of Jerusalem said: Is not this he whom they seek to kill?Dicebant ergo quidam ex Jerosolymis : Nonne hic est, quem quaerunt interficere? 26 And behold, he speaketh openly, and they say nothing to him. Have the rulers known for a truth, that this is the Christ?et ecce palam loquitur, et nihil ei dicunt. Numquid vere cognoverunt principes quia hic est Christus? 27 But we know this man, whence he is: but when the Christ cometh, no man knoweth whence he is.Sed hunc scimus unde sit : Christus autem cum venerit, nemo scit unde sit. 28 Jesus therefore cried out in the temple, teaching, and saying: You both know me, and you know whence I am: and I am not come of myself; but he that sent me, is true, whom you know not.Clamabat ergo Jesus in templo docens, et dicens : Et me scitis, et unde sim scitis : et a meipso non veni, sed est verus qui misit me, quem vos nescitis. 29 I know him, because I am from him, and he hath sent me.Ego scio eum : quia ab ipso sum, et ipse me misit. 30 They sought therefore to apprehend him: and no man laid hands on him, because his hour was not yet come.Quaerebant ergo eum apprehendere : et nemo misit in illum manus, quia nondum venit hora ejus. 31 But of the people many believed in him, and said: When the Christ cometh, shall he do more miracles, than these which this man doth?De turba autem multi crediderunt in eum, et dicebant : Christus cum venerit, numquid plura signa faciet quam quae hic facit?

➡️ ➡️ DESCRIPTION: Après avoir entendu une défense biblique du pédobaptême réformé, nous poursuivons notre série en donnant la parole à la perspective crédobaptiste. Cette position, largement répandue dans les milieux évangéliques, affirme que le baptême est destiné à ceux qui professent personnellement la foi en Jésus-Christ. Elle met l'accent sur la conversion, la repentance et la foi consciente comme conditions du baptême. Cependant, ses fondements bibliques reposent sur une articulation distincte du plan rédempteur de Dieu et de la théologie biblique par laquelle nous relions l'Ancien et le Nouveau Testament. Le professeur Sylvain Romerowski de l'Institut biblique de Nogent-sur-Marne présente pour nous le bien-fondé de la compréhension baptiste. Vous pouvez retrouver les publications web du professeur Romerowski sur son blog à l'adresse suivante: https://sylvain-romerowski.ibnogent.org/ TABLE DES MATIÈRES 00:00 - Start 02:24 - Résumé de la compréhension credobatiste 05:51 - Le fondement vétérotestamentaire 14:59 - L'accomplissement néotestamentaire 21:32 - La mixité sous l'ancienne et sous la nouvelle alliance 29:31 - Le NT associe clairement le baptême à une profession de foi 36:37 - Le baptême est-il un moyen de grâce? 44:29 - Les conditions pour recevoir le baptême 48:29 - Quid des faux-disciples et la mixité de l'Église? 58:26 - L'efficacité du baptême 01:00:52 - Rejet de la théologie de l'alliance pédobaptiste 01:20:36 - Église visible et invisible = deux Églises? 01:28:00 - Quel est le statut des enfants dans l'Église? Conclusion 01:34:49 -

17 And Jesus going up to Jerusalem, took the twelve disciples apart, and said to them:Et ascendens Jesus Jerosolymam, assumpsit duodecim discipulos secreto, et ait illis : 18 Behold we go up to Jerusalem, and the Son of man shall be betrayed to the chief priests and the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death.Ecce ascendimus Jerosolymam, et Filius hominis tradetur principibus sacerdotum, et scribis, et condemnabunt eum morte, 19 And shall deliver him to the Gentiles to be mocked, and scourged, and crucified, and the third day he shall rise again.et tradent eum gentibus ad illudendum, et flagellandum, et crucifigendum, et tertia die resurget. 20 Then came to him the mother of the sons of Zebedee with her sons, adoring and asking something of him.Tunc accessit ad eum mater filiorum Zebedaei cum filiis suis, adorans et petens aliquid ab eo. 21 Who said to her: What wilt thou? She saith to him: Say that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on thy left, in thy kingdom.Qui dixit ei : Quid vis? Ait illi : Dic ut sedeant hi duo filii mei, unus ad dexteram tuam, et unus ad sinistram in regno tuo. 22 And Jesus answering, said: You know not what you ask. Can you drink the chalice that I shall drink? They say to him: We can.Respondens autem Jesus, dixit : Nescitis quid petatis. Potestis bibere calicem, quem ego bibiturus sum? Dicunt ei : Possumus. 23 He saith to them: My chalice indeed you shall drink; but to sit on my right or left hand, is not mine to give to you, but to them for whom it is prepared by my Father.Ait illis : Calicem quidem meum bibetis : sedere autem ad dexteram meam vel sinistram non est meum dare vobis, sed quibus paratum est a Patre meo. 24 And the ten hearing it, were moved with indignation against the two brethren.Et audientes decem, indignati sunt de duobus fratribus. 25 But Jesus called them to him, and said: You know that the princes of the Gentiles lord it over them; and they that are the greater, exercise power upon them.Jesus autem vocavit eos ad se, et ait : Scitis quia principes gentium dominantur eorum : et qui majores sunt, potestatem exercent in eos. 26 It shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be the greater among you, let him be your minister:Non ita erit inter vos : sed quicumque voluerit inter vos major fieri, sit vester minister : 27 And he that will be first among you, shall be your servant.et qui voluerit inter vos primus esse, erit vester servus. 28 Even as the Son of man is not come to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a redemption for many.Sicut Filius hominis non venit ministrari, sed ministrare, et dare animam suam redemptionem pro multis.Jesus foretells His Passion and Ressurection. He will make us participants in His Resurrection if we die to our sins.

La Russie a envahi l'Ukraine le 24 février 2022. Quatre ans plus tard, qu'en est-il sur le terrain et quel rôle joue l'Europe ? En France, le meurtre de Quentin Deranque modifie-t-il la dynamique des différents partis politiques en vue des élections municipales ?

Merci Marion ! Pour (ré)écouter l'épisode 1 avec Marion : Marion et l'immense poids de son héritage familial (restez jusqu'au bout)--COACHING RELATION À L'ARGENT

Quid Pro Roll is a collaborative independent effort with support from Richmond Comix, and wonderful people like you!! Richmond Comix:  Richmond Comix has been serving the folks of central VA the best comics since 1987. :D | Conveniently located in Arch Village, Richmond VA. Patreon: Coming soon, but not quite ready!! Find our magnificent GM, our scallywag performers, our devoted editor, and supportive supporting composer at the links below! Alex Smith: https://www.facebook.com/richmondcomix Gabriel Perez: https://gabrielperez.bandcamp.com/  Luke Davis: https://linktr.ee/BraveGM  Jenna Garrett: https://linktr.ee/jennachil  Josh Maltby: https://bsky.app/profile/blackcloakdm.bsky.social  Scott Moore: https://linktr.ee/grooveis4life  Join over 1000+ friendly TTRPG nerds and discuss the show over on the Goblins and Growlers Discord! http://bit.ly/goblindiscord  Also, give a listen to our sister podcast, The Goblins and Growlers Podcast, https://goblinsandgrowlers.podbean.com, for TTRPG news, interviews, and discussion.

Le 39ᵉ sommet de l'Union africaine (UA) s'est achevé dimanche à Addis-Abeba. Parmi les nombreux dossiers abordés par les chefs d'État et de gouvernement réunis dans la capitale éthiopienne, celui de la Guinée-Bissau, après le coup d'État militaire du général Horta N'Tam le 26 novembre dernier. Patrice Trovoada, ex-Premier ministre de Sao Tomé-et-Principe, a été nommé le 23 janvier dernier envoyé spécial de l'UA pour la Guinée-Bissau. Il confie à RFI avoir prévu de se rendre à Bissau « dans les prochains jours », sans préciser de date. Ce sommet a bien sûr été pour lui l'occasion de mener, déjà, une série de discussions. Avec qui ? Comment juge-t-il le processus de transition en cours à Bissau ? Comment aborde-t-il sa mission ? Quid des doléances de l'opposition, qui estime s'être fait voler la victoire à la présidentielle de novembre dernier ? Patrice Trovoada, envoyé spécial de l'UA pour la Guinée-Bissau, est l'invité Afrique de RFI, au micro de l'envoyé spécial de RFI à Addis-Abeba, David Baché. RFI : Aucune tolérance pour les changements de pouvoir anticonstitutionnels : c'est la volonté affichée par l'Union africaine à l'issue de ce 39ᵉ sommet. Le message semble s'adresser, entre autres, à la Guinée-Bissau ? Patrice Trovoada : Oui, il y a eu cette déclaration du président João Lourenço. L'Union africaine, dans sa charte, refuse tout changement anticonstitutionnel. Cela peut être un coup d'État militaire, cela peut être d'autres tripatouillages de la Constitution pour lesquels l'Union africaine dit non. Le président guinéen Mamadi Doumbouya et le président gabonais Brice Oligui Nguema étaient dans la salle. On se dit que c'est peut-être une déclaration pour l'avenir ? Écoutez, chaque pays est un cas. Si la gouvernance piétine la Constitution, c'est aussi quelque chose que la charte de l'Union africaine réfute. Vous qui êtes envoyé spécial de l'Union africaine pour la Guinée-Bissau, est-ce que ça vous a conforté et encouragé dans votre mission ? La mission est très claire. C'est d'abord d'établir un contact non seulement avec les autorités de transition, mais avec tous les acteurs politiques, les institutions républicaines et la société civile. Il faut déjà créer un climat de confiance, qu'il y ait de la retenue et que les gens soient disposés à dialoguer politiquement pour que cette transition puisse déboucher sur le retour à une vie constitutionnelle normale, un État de droit, et que ça soit crédible et durable. À l'occasion de ce sommet de l'Union africaine, avec qui vous avez eu des rencontres constructives ? J'ai eu plusieurs rencontres. Celle qu'il y a lieu de signaler, c'est avec le président Julius Maada Bio, le président en exercice de la Cédéao. La rencontre a été très positive. Et bien sûr, j'ai eu à travailler avec le président de la Commission et son staff pour que nous puissions aider les Guinéens dans cette épreuve et qu'on ait un retour et une stabilité qui soit durable. Après leur coup d'État en novembre dernier, les militaires au pouvoir à Bissau ont déjà modifié la Constitution et fixé des élections pour décembre prochain. Est-ce que le processus de transition tel qu'il s'engage vous semble crédible ? Les autorités ont pris un certain nombre de décisions. Ce qui est important aujourd'hui, c'est que nous puissions établir un dialogue qui soit inclusif, pas seulement avec les autorités. Il faut un climat de confiance pour que nous puissions effectivement progresser. Ces décisions sont obligées, comme c'est normal, de contestation. Le fait d'avoir fixé une date pour des élections, c'est déjà bien. Maintenant, nous allons voir l'inclusivité et la possibilité parce que les élections, c'est quand même tout un processus. S'il y a un certain nombre de pas qui doivent être remplis avant d'aller vers les urnes, nous verrons avec les uns et les autres comment est-ce qu'on peut rassurer sur ce processus de transition. À écouter aussi«Il n'est pas acceptable que des auteurs de coup d'État soient élus démocratiquement» On entend votre volonté d'accompagner cette transition jusqu'à des élections crédibles, inclusives, y compris avec les partis d'opposition. Mais justement, l'opposition et la société civile souhaiteraient tout simplement qu'on proclame les résultats des élections qui ont déjà été organisées et qui ont déjà un vainqueur... C'est un point de vue qu'il faut prendre en considération. De l'autre côté, vous avez une autorité de transition qu'il faut aussi prendre en considération. Il va donc falloir progresser vers une sortie de crise acceptable par tous. Au-delà des acteurs politiques, est-ce que ça ne serait pas plus juste pour les citoyens bissau-guinéens qui se sont exprimés lors de ces élections de se conformer à leurs résultats ? Je crois qu'il faut être très humble dans ce genre de situation. Il y a une autorité de transition qui détient le pouvoir réel. Nous allons nous rapprocher d'elle et nous allons aussi, comme je vous l'ai dit, inclure dans nos contacts tout le monde. Il faut choisir d'être du côté de la solution crédible et inclusive. L'opposant Domingos Simoes Pereira a été convoqué par la justice militaire la semaine dernière. Cela vous inquiète-t-il ? Sur place, j'aurai l'occasion, du moins je l'espère, d'avoir de plus amples informations sur ce dossier-là. Je demanderai aussi à contacter les autorités judiciaires pour m'enquérir de ce qui se passe à ce niveau-là. L'opposition affirme que l'ex-président Umaro Sissoco Embaló a lui-même préparé l'arrivée des militaires pour empêcher Fernando Dias, qui revendique la victoire à la présidentielle, d'accéder au pouvoir. De son côté, l'ancien président est toujours en exil et demande des garanties de sécurité pour rentrer à Bissau. Aujourd'hui, avec un peu plus de deux mois de recul, était-ce un vrai ou un faux coup d'État ? Vous comprendrez facilement la délicatesse de cette mission. Nous allons travailler avec beaucoup de réalisme et ne lâcherons pas les principes et les convictions et la charte de l'Union africaine. Nous allons essayer d'amener tout ça à bon port. À lire aussiFin du sommet de l'Union africaine: «Aucune tolérance pour les changements de pouvoir anticonstitutionnels»

Au sommaire de Radio Foot internationale ce mardi, 2 émissions en direct 16h10-21h10 T.U. : - Ligue des Champions, encore un adversaire de Ligue 1 en barrages pour le PSG ! ; - 3 semaines après la phase de ligue, nouveau déplacement du Real Madrid sur le terrain de Benfica. ; - Coup de théâtre et faux départ de Mehdi Benatia, de retour à l'OM !   - Ligue des Champions, encore un adversaire de Ligue 1 en barrages pour le PSG ! Le 11 de Luis Enrique arrive-t-il avec plus de doutes à Monaco que lors des 2 manches face à Brest ? - L'irrégularité parisienne crispe, le club doit retrouver son collectif. - Les Rouge et Blanc, qui l'avaient emporté 1-0, le 29 novembre 2025 en championnat, restent solides chez eux en C1. Mais ils n'ont plus gagné de confrontation à élimination directe depuis un ¼ de finale 2016-2017. Akliouche incertain, Adingra, recrue gagnante du mercato ? Les Azuréens vont-ils saisir leur chance ? Thomas de Saint-Léger est sur place. - Comme on se retrouve ! 3 semaines après la phase de ligue, nouveau déplacement du Real Madrid sur le terrain de Benfica. Les Merengues avaient été secoués 4-2, les Blancos ont une revanche à prendre sur les Aigles. Des Merengues dans une bonne dynamique et leaders de Liga, mais Mourinho prêt à (re)faire un coup contre ses ex ? - Parti pour rester. Coup de théâtre et faux départ de Mehdi Benatia, de retour à l'OM ! Ainsi en a décidé Frank McCourt. Le propriétaire américain veut « assurer l'intérêt supérieur du club et atteindre les objectifs sportifs de la saison en cours. » Le président Longoria mis à l'écart du sportif, l'ex-défenseur qui devient l'homme fort du projet ? Quid du nouvel entraineur ? Pour débattre avec Annie Gasnier : Marco Martins, Manu Terradillos et Éric Rabesandratana. Technique/réalisation : Alice Mesnard - David Fintzel/Pierre Guérin.

Au sommaire de Radio Foot internationale ce mardi, 2 émissions en direct 16h10-21h10 T.U. : - Ligue des Champions, encore un adversaire de Ligue 1 en barrages pour le PSG ! ; - 3 semaines après la phase de ligue, nouveau déplacement du Real Madrid sur le terrain de Benfica. ; - Coup de théâtre et faux départ de Mehdi Benatia, de retour à l'OM !   - Ligue des Champions, encore un adversaire de Ligue 1 en barrages pour le PSG ! Le 11 de Luis Enrique arrive-t-il avec plus de doutes à Monaco que lors des 2 manches face à Brest ? - L'irrégularité parisienne crispe, le club doit retrouver son collectif. - Les Rouge et Blanc, qui l'avaient emporté 1-0, le 29 novembre 2025 en championnat, restent solides chez eux en C1. Mais ils n'ont plus gagné de confrontation à élimination directe depuis un ¼ de finale 2016-2017. Akliouche incertain, Adingra, recrue gagnante du mercato ? Les Azuréens vont-ils saisir leur chance ? Thomas de Saint-Léger est sur place. - Comme on se retrouve ! 3 semaines après la phase de ligue, nouveau déplacement du Real Madrid sur le terrain de Benfica. Les Merengues avaient été secoués 4-2, les Blancos ont une revanche à prendre sur les Aigles. Des Merengues dans une bonne dynamique et leaders de Liga, mais Mourinho prêt à (re)faire un coup contre ses ex ? - Parti pour rester. Coup de théâtre et faux départ de Mehdi Benatia, de retour à l'OM ! Ainsi en a décidé Frank McCourt. Le propriétaire américain veut « assurer l'intérêt supérieur du club et atteindre les objectifs sportifs de la saison en cours. » Le président Longoria mis à l'écart du sportif, l'ex-défenseur qui devient l'homme fort du projet ? Quid du nouvel entraineur ? Pour débattre avec Annie Gasnier : Marco Martins, Manu Terradillos et Éric Rabesandratana. Technique/réalisation : Alice Mesnard - David Fintzel/Pierre Guérin.

31 Then Jesus took unto him the twelve, and said to them: Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things shall be accomplished which were written by the prophets concerning the Son of man.Assumpsit autem Jesus duodecim, et ait illis : Ecce ascendimus Jerosolymam, et consummabuntur omnia quae scripta sunt per prophetas de Filio hominis : 32 For he shall be delivered to the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and scourged, and spit upon:tradetur enim gentibus, et illudetur, et flagellabitur, et conspuetur : 33 And after they have scourged him, they will put him to death; and the third day he shall rise again.et postquam flagellaverint, occident eum, et tertia die resurget. 34 And they understood none of these things, and this word was hid from them, and they understood not the things that were said.Et ipsi nihil horum intellexerunt, et erat verbum istud absconditum ab eis, et non intelligebant quae dicebantur. 35 Now it came to pass, when he drew nigh to Jericho, that a certain blind man sat by the way side, begging.Factum est autem, cum appropinquaret Jericho, caecus quidam sedebat secus viam, mendicans. 36 And when he heard the multitude passing by, he asked what this meant.Et cum audiret turbam praetereuntem, interrogabat quid hoc esset. 37 And they told him, that Jesus of Nazareth was passing by.Dixerunt autem ei quod Jesus Nazarenus transiret. 38 And he cried out, saying: Jesus, son of David, have mercy on me.Et clamavit, dicens : Jesu, fili David, miserere mei. 39 And they that went before, rebuked him, that he should hold his peace: but he cried out much more: Son of David, have mercy on me.Et qui praeibant, increpabant eum ut taceret. Ipse vero multo magis clamabat : Fili David, miserere mei. 40 And Jesus standing, commanded him to be brought unto him. And when he was come near, he asked him,Stans autem Jesus jussit illum adduci ad se. Et cum appropinquasset, interrogavit illum, 41 Saying: What wilt thou that I do to thee? But he said: Lord, that I may see.dicens : Quid tibi vis faciam? At ille dixit : Domine, ut videam. 42 And Jesus said to him: Receive thy sight: thy faith hath made thee whole.Et Jesus dixit illi : Respice, fides tua te salvum fecit. 43 And immediately he saw, and followed him, glorifying God. And all the people, when they saw it, gave praise to God.Et confestim vidit, et sequebatur illum magnificans Deum. Et omnis plebs ut vidit, dedit laudem Deo.Pope St Gregory the Great says: "The man born blind of whom the Gospel tells is surely the human race. Ever since man has been turned out of Paradise in the person of our first father, he has not known the light of heaven, and therefore has suffered through being plunged into the darkness of condemnation."

31 Then Jesus took unto him the twelve, and said to them: Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things shall be accomplished which were written by the prophets concerning the Son of man.Assumpsit autem Jesus duodecim, et ait illis : Ecce ascendimus Jerosolymam, et consummabuntur omnia quae scripta sunt per prophetas de Filio hominis : 32 For he shall be delivered to the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and scourged, and spit upon:tradetur enim gentibus, et illudetur, et flagellabitur, et conspuetur : 33 And after they have scourged him, they will put him to death; and the third day he shall rise again.et postquam flagellaverint, occident eum, et tertia die resurget. 34 And they understood none of these things, and this word was hid from them, and they understood not the things that were said.Et ipsi nihil horum intellexerunt, et erat verbum istud absconditum ab eis, et non intelligebant quae dicebantur. 35 Now it came to pass, when he drew nigh to Jericho, that a certain blind man sat by the way side, begging.Factum est autem, cum appropinquaret Jericho, caecus quidam sedebat secus viam, mendicans. 36 And when he heard the multitude passing by, he asked what this meant.Et cum audiret turbam praetereuntem, interrogabat quid hoc esset. 37 And they told him, that Jesus of Nazareth was passing by.Dixerunt autem ei quod Jesus Nazarenus transiret. 38 And he cried out, saying: Jesus, son of David, have mercy on me.Et clamavit, dicens : Jesu, fili David, miserere mei. 39 And they that went before, rebuked him, that he should hold his peace: but he cried out much more: Son of David, have mercy on me.Et qui praeibant, increpabant eum ut taceret. Ipse vero multo magis clamabat : Fili David, miserere mei. 40 And Jesus standing, commanded him to be brought unto him. And when he was come near, he asked him,Stans autem Jesus jussit illum adduci ad se. Et cum appropinquasset, interrogavit illum, 41 Saying: What wilt thou that I do to thee? But he said: Lord, that I may see.dicens : Quid tibi vis faciam? At ille dixit : Domine, ut videam. 42 And Jesus said to him: Receive thy sight: thy faith hath made thee whole.Et Jesus dixit illi : Respice, fides tua te salvum fecit. 43 And immediately he saw, and followed him, glorifying God. And all the people, when they saw it, gave praise to God.Et confestim vidit, et sequebatur illum magnificans Deum. Et omnis plebs ut vidit, dedit laudem Deo.

31 Then Jesus took unto him the twelve, and said to them: Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things shall be accomplished which were written by the prophets concerning the Son of man.Assumpsit autem Jesus duodecim, et ait illis : Ecce ascendimus Jerosolymam, et consummabuntur omnia quae scripta sunt per prophetas de Filio hominis : 32 For he shall be delivered to the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and scourged, and spit upon:tradetur enim gentibus, et illudetur, et flagellabitur, et conspuetur : 33 And after they have scourged him, they will put him to death; and the third day he shall rise again.et postquam flagellaverint, occident eum, et tertia die resurget. 34 And they understood none of these things, and this word was hid from them, and they understood not the things that were said.Et ipsi nihil horum intellexerunt, et erat verbum istud absconditum ab eis, et non intelligebant quae dicebantur. 35 Now it came to pass, when he drew nigh to Jericho, that a certain blind man sat by the way side, begging.Factum est autem, cum appropinquaret Jericho, caecus quidam sedebat secus viam, mendicans. 36 And when he heard the multitude passing by, he asked what this meant.Et cum audiret turbam praetereuntem, interrogabat quid hoc esset. 37 And they told him, that Jesus of Nazareth was passing by.Dixerunt autem ei quod Jesus Nazarenus transiret. 38 And he cried out, saying: Jesus, son of David, have mercy on me.Et clamavit, dicens : Jesu, fili David, miserere mei. 39 And they that went before, rebuked him, that he should hold his peace: but he cried out much more: Son of David, have mercy on me.Et qui praeibant, increpabant eum ut taceret. Ipse vero multo magis clamabat : Fili David, miserere mei. 40 And Jesus standing, commanded him to be brought unto him. And when he was come near, he asked him,Stans autem Jesus jussit illum adduci ad se. Et cum appropinquasset, interrogavit illum, 41 Saying: What wilt thou that I do to thee? But he said: Lord, that I may see.dicens : Quid tibi vis faciam? At ille dixit : Domine, ut videam. 42 And Jesus said to him: Receive thy sight: thy faith hath made thee whole.Et Jesus dixit illi : Respice, fides tua te salvum fecit. 43 And immediately he saw, and followed him, glorifying God. And all the people, when they saw it, gave praise to God.Et confestim vidit, et sequebatur illum magnificans Deum. Et omnis plebs ut vidit, dedit laudem Deo.

Quid Pro Roll is a collaborative independent effort with support from Richmond Comix, and wonderful people like you!! Richmond Comix:  Richmond Comix has been serving the folks of central VA the best comics since 1987. :D | Conveniently located in Arch Village, Richmond VA. Patreon: Coming soon, but not quite ready!! Find our magnificent GM, our scallywag performers, our devoted editor, and supportive supporting composer at the links below! Alex Smith: https://www.facebook.com/richmondcomix Gabriel Perez: https://gabrielperez.bandcamp.com/  Luke Davis: https://linktr.ee/BraveGM  Jenna Garrett: https://linktr.ee/jennachil  Josh Maltby: https://bsky.app/profile/blackcloakdm.bsky.social  Scott Moore: https://linktr.ee/grooveis4life  Join over 1000+ friendly TTRPG nerds and discuss the show over on the Goblins and Growlers Discord! http://bit.ly/goblindiscord  Also, give a listen to our sister podcast, The Goblins and Growlers Podcast, https://goblinsandgrowlers.podbean.com, for TTRPG news, interviews, and discussion.

Bob Goodson was the first employee at Yelp, founder of social media analytics company Quid, co-inventor of the Like button, and co-author of the new book Like: The Button That Changed the World. On Oct 1, 2025, Bob spent a day with our MBA students at the University of Kansas, and he shared so much great content that I asked him if we could put together some of the highlights as a podcast, which I've now put together in three chapters: First is Careers, second is Building Companies, and third is AI and Social Media. As a reminder, any views and perspectives expressed on the podcast are solely those of the individual, and not those of the organizations they represent. Hope you enjoy the episode. - [Transcript] Nate:  My name is Nate Meikle. You're listening to Meikles and Dimes, where every episode is dedicated to the simple, practical, and under-appreciated. Bob Goodson was the first employee at Yelp, founder of social media analytics company Quid, co-inventor of the like button, and co-author of the new book Like: The Button That Changed the World. On Oct 1, 2025, Bob spent a day with our MBA students at the University of Kansas, and he shared so much great content that I asked him if we could put together some of the highlights as a podcast, which I've now put together in three chapters: First is Careers, second is Building Companies, and third is AI and Social Media. As a reminder, any views and perspectives expressed on the podcast are solely those of the individual and not those of the organizations they represent. Hope you enjoy the episode. Let's jump into Chapter 1 on Careers. For the first question, a student asked Bob who he has become and how his experiences have shaped him as a person and leader.   Bob:  Oh, thanks, Darrell. That's a thoughtful question. It's thoughtful because it's often not asked, and it's generally not discussed. But I will say, and hopefully you'll feel like this about your work if you don't already, that you will over time, which is I'm 45 now, so I have some sort of vantage point to look back over. Like, I mean, I started working when I was about 9 or 10 years old, so I have been working for money for about 35 years. So I'm like a bit further into my career than perhaps I look. I've been starting companies and things since I was about 10. So, in terms of like my professional career, which I guess started, you know, just over 20 years ago, 20 years into that kind of work, the thing I'm most grateful for is what it's allowed me to learn and how it's evolved me as a person. And I'm also most grateful on the business front for how the businesses that I've helped create and the projects and client deployments and whatever have helped evolve the people that have worked on them. Like I genuinely feel that is the most lasting thing that anything in business does is evolve people. It's so gratifying when you have a team member that joins and three years later you see them, just their confidence has developed or their personality has developed in some way. And it's the test of the work that has evolved them as people. I mean, I actually just on Monday night, I caught up for the first time in 10 years with an intern we had 10 years ago called Max Hofer. You can look him up. He was an intern at Quid. He was from Europe, was studying in London, came to do an internship with us in San Francisco for the summer. And, he was probably like 18, 19 years old. And a few weeks ago, he launched his AI company, Parsewise, with funding from Y Combinator. And, he cites his experience at Quid as being fundamental in choosing his career path, in choosing what field he worked in and so on. So that was, yeah, that was, when you see these things happening, right, 10 years on, we caught up at an event we did in London on Monday. And it's just it's really rewarding. So I suppose, yeah, like I suppose it's it's brought me a lot of perspective, brought me a lot of inner peace, actually, you know, the and and when you're when I was in the thick of it at times, I had no sense of that whatsoever. Right. Like in tough years. And there were some - there have been some very tough years in my working career that you don't feel like it's developing you in any way. It just feels brutal. I liken starting a company, sometimes it's like someone's put you in a room with a massive monster and the monster pins you down and just bats you across the face, right, for like a while. And you're like just trying to get away from the monster and you're like, finally you get the monster off your back and then like the monster's just on you again. And it just, it's just like you get a little bit of space and freedom and then the monster's back and it's just like pummeling you. And it's just honestly some years, like for those of you, some of you are running companies now, right? And starting your own companies as well. And I suppose it's not just starting companies. There are just phases in your career and work where it's like you look back and you're like, man, that year was just like, that was brutal. You just get up and fight every day, and you just get knocked down every day. So I think, I don't wish that on anybody, but it does build resilience that then transfers into other aspects of your life.    Nate:  Next, a student made a reference to the first podcast episode I recorded with Bob and asked him if he felt like he was still working on the most important problem in his field.    Bob:  Yeah, thank you. Thanks for listening to the podcast, as this gives us… thanks for the chance to plug the podcast. So the way I met Nate is that he interviewed me for his podcast. And for those of you who haven't listened to it, it's a 30 minute interview. And he asked this question about what advice would you share with others? And we honed in on this question of like, what is the most important problem in your field? And are you working on it? Which I love as a guide to like choosing what to work on. And so we had a great conversation. I enjoyed it so much and really enjoyed meeting Nate. So we sort of said, hey, let's do more fun stuff together in the future. So that's what brought us to this conversation. And thanks to Nate for, you know, bringing us all together today. I'm always working on what I think is the most important problem in front of me. And I always will be. I can't help it. I don't have to think about it. I just can't think about anything else. So yes, I do feel like right now I'm working on the most important problem in my field. And I feel like I've been doing that for about 20 years. And it's not for everybody, I suppose. But I just think, like, let's talk about that idea a little bit. And then I'll say what I think is the most important problem in my field that I'm working on. Like, just to translate it for each of you. Systems are always evolving. The systems we live in are evolving. We all know that. People talk about the pace of change and like life's changing, technology's changing and so on. Well, it is, right? Like humans developed agriculture 5,000 years ago. That wasn't very long ago. Agriculture, right? Just the idea that you could grow crops in one area and live in that area without walking around, without moving around settlements and different living in different places. And that concept is only 5,000 years old, right? I mean, people debate exactly how old, like 7, 8,000. But anyway, it's not that long ago, considering Homo sapiens have been walking around for in one form or another for several hundred thousand years and humans in general for a couple million years. So 5,000 years is not long. Look at what's happened in 5,000 years, right? Like houses, the first settlements where you would actually just live at sleep in the same place every night is only 5,000 years old. And now we've got on a - you can access all the world's knowledge - on your phone for free through ChatGPT and ask it sophisticated questions and all right answers. Or you can get on a plane and fly all over the world. You have, you know, sophisticated digital currency systems. We have sophisticated laws. And like, we've got to be aware, I think, that we are living in a time of great change. And that has been true for 5,000 years, right? That's not new. So I think about this concept of the forefront. I imagine, human development is, you can just simply imagine it like a sphere or balloon that someone's like blowing up, right? And so every time they breathe into it, like something shifts and it just gets bigger. And so there's stuff happening on the forefront where it's occupying more space, different space, right? There's stuff in the middle that's like a bit more stable and a bit more, less prone to rapid change, right? The education system, some parts of the healthcare system, like certain professions, certain things that are like a bit more stable, but there's stuff happening all the time on the periphery, right? Like on the boundary. And that stuff is affecting every field in one way or another. And I just think if you get a chance to work on that stuff, that's a really interesting place to live and a really interesting place to work. And I feel like you can make a contribution to that, right, if you put yourself on the edge. And it's true for every field. So whatever field you're in, we had people here today, you know, in everything from, yeah, like the military to fitness to, you know, your product, product design and management and, you know, lots of different, you know, people, different backgrounds. But if you ask yourself, what is the most important thing happening in my area of work today, and then try to find some way to work on it, then I think that sort of is a nice sort of North Star and keeps things interesting. Because the sort of breakthroughs and discoveries and important contributions are actually not complicated once you put yourself in that position. They're obvious once you put yourself in that position, right? It's just that there aren't many people there hanging out in that place. If you're one of them, if you put yourself there, not everyone's there, suddenly you're kind of in a room where like lots of cool stuff can happen, but there aren't many people around to compete with you. So you're more likely to find those breakthroughs, whether it's for your company or for, you know, the people you work with or, you know, maybe it's inventions and, but it just, anyway, so I really like doing that. And in my space right now, I call it the concept of being the bridge. And this could apply to all of you too. It's a simple idea that the world's value, right, is locked up in companies, essentially. Companies create value. We can debate all the other vehicles that do it, but basically most of the world's value is tied up in companies and their processes. And that's been true for a long time. There's a new ball of power in the world, which is been created by large language models. And I think of that just like a new ball of power. So you've got a ball of value and a ball of power. And the funny thing about this new ball of power is this actually has no value. That's a funny thing to say, right? The large language models have no value. They don't. They don't have any value and they don't create value. Think about it. It's just a massive bag of words. That has no value, right? I can send you a poem now in the chat. Does that have any value? You might like it, you might not, but it's just a set of words, right? So you've got this massive bag of words that with like a trillion connections, no value whatsoever. That is different from previous tech trends like e-commerce, for example, which had inherent value because it was a new way to reach consumers. So some tech trends do have inherent value because they're new processes, but large language models don't. They're just a new technology. They're very powerful. So I call it a ball of power. but they don't have any value. So why is there a multi-trillion dollar opportunity in front of all of us right now in terms of value creation? It's being the bridge. It's how to make use of this ball of power to improve businesses. And businesses only have two ways you improve them. You save money or you grow revenue. That's it. So being the bridge, like taking this new ball of power and finding ways to save money, be more efficient, taking this new ball of power and finding ways to access new consumers, create new offerings and so on, right? Solve new problems. That is where all the value is. So while you may think that the new value, this multi-trillion dollar opportunity with AI is really for the people that work on the AI companies, sure, there's a lot of, you know, there's some money to be made there. And if you can go work for OpenAI, you probably should. Everyone should be knocking the door down. Everyone should be applying for positions because it's the most important company, you know, in our generation. But if you're not in OpenAI or Meta or Microsoft or whoever, you know, three or four companies in the US that are doing this, for everybody else, it's about being the bridge, finding ways that in your organizations, you can unlock the power of AI by bringing it into the organizations and finding ways to either save money or grow the business. And that's fascinating to me because anybody can be the bridge. You don't have to be good with large language models. You have to understand business processes and you have to be creative and willing to even think like this. And suddenly you can be on the forefront of like creating massive value at your companies because you were the, you know, you're the one that brings brings in the new tools. And I think that skill set, there are certain skills involved in being the bridge, but that skill set of being the bridge is going to be so valuable in the next 5 to 10 years. So I encourage people, and that's what I'm doing. Like, I see my role - I serve clients at Quid. I love working with clients. You know, I'm not someone that really like thrives for management and like day-to-day operations and administration of a business. I learned that about myself. And so I just spend my time serving clients. I have done for several years now. And I love just meeting clients and figuring out how they can use Quid's AI, Quid's data, and any other form of AI that we want to bring to the table to improve their businesses. And that's just what I do with my time full-time. And I'll probably be doing that for at least the next 5 or 10 years. I think the outlook for that area of work is really huge.    Nate:  Building on the podcast episode where Bob talked about working on the most important problem in his field, I asked if he could give us some more details on how he took that advice and ended up at Yelp.    Bob:  So I was in grad school in the UK studying, well, I was actually on a program for medieval literature and philosophy, but looking into like language theory. So it was not the most commercial course that one could be doing. But I was a hobbyist programmer, played around with the web when it first came up and was making, you know, various new types of websites for students. while in my free time. I didn't think of that as commercial at all. I didn't see any commercial potential in that. But I did meet the founders of PayPal that way, who would come to give a talk. And I guess they saw the potential in me as a product manager. You know, there's lots of new apps they wanted to build. This is in 2003. And so they invited me to the US to work for them. And I joined the incubator when there were just five people in it. Max Levchin was one of them, the PayPal co-founder. Yelp, Jeremy Stoppelman and Russel Simmons were in those first five people. They turned out to be the Yelp co-founders. And Yelp came out of the incubator. So we were actually prototyping 4 companies each in a different industry. There was a chat application that we called Chatango that was five years before Twitter or something, but it was a way of helping people to chat online more easily. There were, which is still around today, but didn't make it as a hit. There was an ad network called AdRoll, which ended up getting renamed and is still around today. That wasn't a huge hit, but it's still around. Then there was Slide, which is photo sharing application, photo and video sharing, which was Max's company. That was acquired by Google. And that did reasonably well. I think it was acquired for about $150 million. And then there was Yelp, which you'll probably know if you're in the US and went public on the New York Stock Exchange and now has a billion dollars in revenue. So those are the four things that we were trying to prototype, each very different, as you can see. But I suppose that's the like tactical story, right? Like the steps that took me there. But there was an idea that took me there that started this journey of working on the most, the most important problems that are happening in the time. So if I rewind, when I was studying medieval literature, I got to the point where I was studying the invention of the print press. And I'd been studying manuscript culture and seeing what happened when the print press was invented and how it changed education, politics, society. You know, when you took this technology that made it cheaper to print, to make books, books were so expensive in the Middle Ages. They were the domain of only the wealthiest people. And only 5% of people could read before the print process was invented, right? So 95% of people couldn't read anything or write anything. And that was because the books themselves were just so expensive, they had to be handwritten, right? And so when the print press made the cost of a book drop dramatically, the literacy rates in Europe shot up and it completely transformed society. So I was studying that period and at the same time, like dabbling with websites in the early internet and sort of going, oh, like there was this moment where I was like, the web is our equivalent of the print press. And it's happening right now. I'm talking like maybe 2002, or so when I had this realization. It's happening right now. It's going to change everything during our lifetimes. And I just had a fork in my life where it's like I could be a professor in medieval history, which was the path I was on professionally. I had a scholarship. There were only 5 scholarships in my year, in the whole UK. I was on a scholarship track to be a professor and study things like the emergence of the print press, or I could contribute to the print press of our era, which is the internet, and find some way to contribute, some way, right? It didn't matter to me if it was big or small, it was irrelevant. It was just be in the mix with people that are pushing the boundaries. Whatever I did, I'd take the most junior role available, no problem, but like just be in the mix with the people that are doing that. So yeah, that was the decision, right? Like, and that's what led me down to sort of leave my course, leave my scholarship. And, my salary was $40,000 when I moved to the US. All right. And that's pretty much all I earned for a while. I'd spent everything I had starting a group called Oxford Entrepreneurs. So I had absolutely no money. The last few months actually living in Oxford, I had one meal a day because I didn't have enough money to buy three meals a day. And then I packed up my stuff in a suitcase - one bag - wasn't even a suitcase, it was a rucksack and moved to the US and, you know, and landed there basically on a student visa and friends and family was just thought I was, you know, not making a good decision, right? Like, I'm not earning much money. It's with a bunch of people in a like a dorm room style incubator, right? Where the tables and chairs we pulled off the street because we didn't want to spend money on tables and chairs. And where I get to work seven days a week, 12 hours a day. And I've just walked away from a scholarship and a PhD track at Oxford to go into that. And it didn't look like a good decision. But to me, the chance to work on the forefront of what's happening in our era is just too important and too interesting to not make those decisions. So I've done that a number of times, even when it's gone against commercial interest or career interest. I haven't made the best career decisions, you know, not from a commercial standpoint, but from a like getting to work on the new stuff. Like that's what I've prioritized.    Nate:  Next, I asked Bob about his first meeting with the PayPal founders and how he made an impression on them.    Bob:  Good question, because I think... So I have a high level thought on that, like a rubric to use. And then I have the details. I'll start with the details. So I had started the entrepreneurship club at Oxford. And believe it or not, in 800 years of the University's history, there was no entrepreneurship club. And they know that because when you want to start a new society, you go to university and they go through the archive, which is kept underground in the library, and someone goes down to the library archives and they go through all these pages for 800 years and look for the society that's called that. And if there is one, they pull it out and then they have the charter and you have to continue the charter. Even if it was started 300 years ago, they pull out the charter and they're like, no, you have to modify that one. You can't start with a new charter. So anyway, it's because it's technically a part of the university, right? So they have a way of administrating it. So they went through the records and were like, there's never been a club for entrepreneurs at the university. So we started the first, I was one of the co-founders of this club. And, again, there's absolutely no pay. It was just a charity as part of the university. But I love the idea of getting students who were scientists together with students that were business minded, and kind of bringing technical and creative people together. That was the theme of the club. So we'd host drinks, events and talks and all sorts. And I love building communities, at least at that stage of my life. I loved building communities. I'd been doing it. I started several charities and clubs, you know, throughout my life. So it came quite naturally to me. But what I didn't, I mean, I kind of thought this could happen, but it really changed my life as it put me at the center of this super interesting community that we've built. And I think that when you're in a university environment, like starting clubs, running clubs, even if they're small, like, we, I ran another club that we called BEAR. It was an acronym. And it was just a weekly meetup in a pub where we talked about politics and society and stuff. And like, it didn't go anywhere. It fizzled out after a year or two, but it was really like an interesting thing to work on. So I think when you're in a university environment, even if you guys are virtual, finding ways to get together, it's so powerful. It's like, it's who you're meeting in courses like this that is so powerful. So I put myself in the middle of this community, and I was running it, I was president of it. So when these people came to speak at the business school, I was asked to bring the students along, and I was given 200 slots in the lecture theatre. So I filled them, I got 200 students along. We had 3,000 members, by the way, after like 2 years running this club. It became the biggest club at the university, and the biggest entrepreneurship student community in Europe. It got written up in The Economist actually as like, because it was so popular. But yeah, it meant that I was in the middle of it. And when the business school said, you can come to the dinner with the speakers afterwards, that was my ticket to sit down next to the founder of PayPal, you know. And so, then I sat down at dinner with him, and I had my portfolio with me, which back then I used to carry around in a little folder, like a black paper folder. And every project I'd worked on, every, because I used to do graphic design for money as a student. So I had my graphic design projects. I had my yoga publishing business and projects in there. I had printouts about the websites I'd created. So when I sat down next to him, and he's like, what do you work on? I just put this thing on the table over dinner and was like, he picked it up and he started going through it. And he was like, what's this? What's this? And I think just having my projects readily available allowed him to sort of get interested in what I was working on. Nowadays, you can have a website, right? Like I didn't have a website for a long time. Now I have one. It's at bobgoodson.com where I put my projects on there. You can check it out if you like. But I think I've always had a portfolio in one way or another. And I think carrying around the stuff that you've done in an interactive way is a really good way to connect with people. But one more thing I'll say on this concept, because it connects more broadly to like life in general, is that I think that I have this theory that in your lifetime, you get around five opportunities put in front of you that you didn't yet fully deserve, right? Someone believes in you, someone opens a door, someone's like, hey, Nate, how about you do this? Or like, we think you might be capable of this. And it doesn't happen very often, but those moments do happen. And when they happen, a massive differentiator for your life is do you notice that it's happening and do you grab it with both hands? And in that moment, do everything you can to make it work, right? Like they don't come along very often. And to me, those moments have been so precious. I knew I wouldn't get many of them. And so every time they happened, I've just been all in. I don't care what's going on in my life at that time. When the door opens, I drop everything, and I do everything I can to make it work. And you're stretched in those situations. So it's not easy, right? Like someone's given you an opportunity to do something you're not ready for, essentially. So you're literally not ready for it. Like you're not good enough, you don't know enough, you don't have the knowledge, you don't have the skills. So you only have to do the job, but you have to cultivate your own skills and develop your skills. And that's a lot of work. You know, when I landed in, I mean, working for Max was one of those opportunities where I did not, I'd not done enough to earn that opportunity when I got that opportunity. I landed with five people who had all done PayPal. They were all like incredible experts in their fields, right? Like Russ Simmons, the Yelp co-founder, had been the chief architect of PayPal. He architected PayPal, right? Like I was with very skilled technical people. I was the only Brit. They were all Americans. So I stood out culturally. Most of them couldn't understand what I was saying when I arrived. I've since changed how I speak. So you can understand me, the Americans in the room. But I just mumbled. I wasn't very articulate. So it was really hard to get my ideas across. And I had programmed as a hobbyist, but I didn't know enough to be able to program production code alongside people that had worked at PayPal. I mean, their security levels and their accuracy and everything was just off the, I was in another league, right? So there I was, I felt totally out of my depth, and I had to fight to stay in that job for a year. Like I fought every day for a year to like not get kicked out of that job and essentially out of the country. Because without their sponsorship, I couldn't have stayed in the country. I was on a student visa with them, right? And I worked seven days a week for 365 days in a row. I basically almost lived in the office. I got an apartment a few blocks from the office and I had to. No one else was working those kind of hours, but I had to do the job, and I had to learn 3 new programming languages and all this technical stuff, how to write specs, how to write product specs like I had to research the history of various websites in parts of the internet. So I'm just, I guess I'm just giving some color to like when these doors open in your career and in your life, sometimes they're relationship doors that open, right? You meet somebody who's going to change your life, and it's like, are you going to fight to make that work? And, you know, like, so not all, it's not always career events, but when they happen, I think like trusting your instinct that this is one of those moments and knowing this is one of the, you can't do this throughout your whole life. You burn out and you die young. Like you're just not sustainable. But when they happen, are you going to put the burners on and be like, I'm in. And sometimes it only takes a few weeks. Like the most it's ever taken for me is a year to walk through a door. But like, anyway, like just saying that in case anyone here has one of these moments and like maybe this will resonate with one of you, and you'll be like, that's one of the moments I need to walk through the door.    Nate:  That concludes chapter one. In chapter 2, Bob talks about building companies. First, I asked Bob if he gained much leadership experience at Yelp.    Bob:  I gained some. I suppose my first year or two in the US was in a technical role. So I didn't have anyone reporting to me. I was just working on the user interface and front end stuff. So really no leadership there. But then, there was a day when we still had five people. Jeremy started to go pitch investors for our second round because we had really good traffic growth, right? In San Francisco, we had really nice charts showing traffic growth. We'd started to get traction in New York and started to get traction in LA. So we've had the start of a nice story, right? Like this works in other cities. We've got a model we can get traffic. And Jeremy went to his first VC pitch for the second round. And the VC said, you need to show that you can monetize the traffic before you raise this round. The growth story is fine, but you also need to say, we've signed 3 customers and they're paying this much, right, monthly. So Jeremy came back from that pitch, and I remember very clearly, he sat down, kind of slumped in his chair and he's like, oh man, we're going to have to do some sales before we can raise this next round. Like we need someone on the team to go close a few new clients. And it's so funny because it's like, me and four people and everyone went like this and faced me at the same time. And I was like, why are you looking at me? Like, I'm not, I didn't know how to start selling to local businesses. And they're like, they all looked at each other and went, no, we think you're probably the best for this, Bob. And they were all engineers, like all four of them were like, background in engineering. Even the CEO was VP engineering at PayPal before he did Yelp. So basically, we were all geeks. And for some reason, they thought I would be the best choice to sell to businesses. And I didn't really have a choice in it, honestly. I didn't want to do it. They were just like, you're like, that's what needs to happen next. And you're the most suitable candidate for it. So I I just started picking up the phone and calling dentists, chiropractors, restaurants. We didn't know if Yelp would resonate with bars or restaurants or healthcare. We thought healthcare was going to be big, which is reasonably big for Yelp now, but it's not the focus. But anyway, I just started calling these random businesses with great reviews. I just started with the best reviewed businesses. And the funny thing is some of those people, my first ever calls are still friends today, right? Like my chiropractor that I called is the second person I ever called and he signed up, ended up being my chiropractor for like 15 years living in San Francisco. And now we're still in touch, and we're great friends. So it's funny, like I dreaded those first calls, but they actually turned out to be really interesting people that I met. But yeah, we didn't have a model. We didn't know what to charge for. So we started out charging for calls. We changed the business's phone number. So if you're, you had a 415 number and you're a chiropractor on Yelp, we would change your number to like a number that Yelp owned, but it went straight through to their phone. So it was a transfer, but it meant our system could track that they got the call through Yelp, right? Yeah. And then we tracked the duration of the call. We couldn't hear the call, but we tracked the duration of the call. And then we could report back to them at the end of the month. You got 10 calls from Yelp this month and we're going to charge you $50 a call or whatever. So I sold that to 5 or 10 customers and people hated it. They hated that model because they're like, they'd get a call, it'd be like a wrong number or they just wanted to ask, they're already a current customer and they're asking about parking or something, right? So then we'd get back to and be like, you got a call and we charged you 50 bucks. So like, no, I can't pay you for that. Like, that was one of my current customers. So now the reality is they were getting loads of advertising and that was really driving the growth for their business, but they didn't want to pay for the call. So then I was like, that's not working. We have to do something else. Then we paid pay for click, which was we put ads on your page and when someone clicks it, they see you. And then people hated that too, because they're like, my mum just told me she's been like clicking on the link, right? Because she's like looking at my business. And my mum probably just cost me 5 bucks because she said she clicked it 10 times. And like, can you take that off my bill? So people hated the clicks. And then one day we just brought in a head of operations, Geoff Donaker. And by this point, by the way, I had like 2 salespeople working for me that I'd hired. And so it was me and two other people. We were calling these companies, signing these contracts. And one day I just had this epiphany. I was like, we should just pay for the ads that are viewed, not the ads that are clicked. In other words, pay for impressions to the ads. So if I tell you, I've put your ad in front of 500 people when they were looking for sushi this month, right? That you don't mind paying for because there's no action involved, but you're like, whoa, it's a big number. You put me in front of 500 people. I'll pay you 200 bucks for that. No problem. Essentially impression-based advertising. And I went to our COO and I was like, I think we should try this. He was like, if you want to give it a go. And I wrote up a contract and started selling it that day. And that is that format, that model now has a billion dollars revenue running through Yelp. So basically they took that model, like I switched it to impression-based advertising. And that was what was right for local. And our metrics were amazing. We're actually able to charge a lot more than we could in the previous two models. And I built out the sales team to about 20 people. Through that process, I got hooked, basically. Like I realized I love selling during that role. I would never have walked into sales, I think, unless everyone had gone, you have to do it. And I dreaded it, but I got really hooked on it. I love the adrenaline of it. I love hunting down these deals and I love like what you can learn from customers when you're selling. You can learn what they need and you can evolve your business model. So I love that flywheel and that's kind of what I've been doing ever since. But I built out a team of 20 people, so I got to learn management, essentially by just doing it at Yelp and building out that team.    Nate:  Next, I asked Bob how he developed his theory of leadership.    Bob:  I actually developed it really early on. You know, I mentioned earlier I'd been starting things since I was about 10 years old. And what's fascinated me between the age of like 10 and maybe, you know, my early 20s, I love the idea of creating stuff with people where no one gets paid. And here's why. These are charities and nonprofits and stuff, right? But I realized really early, if I can lead and motivate in a way where people want to contribute, even though they're not getting paid, and we can create stuff together, if I can learn that aspect, like management in that sense, then if I'm one day paying people, I'm going to get like, I'm going to, we're all going to be so much more effective, essentially, right? Like the organization is going to be so much more effective. And that is a concept I still work with today. Yes, we pay everyone quite well at Quid who works at Quid, right? Like we pay at or above market rate. But I never think about that. I never, ever ask for anything or work with people in a way that I feel they need to do it because that's their job ever. I just erased that from my mindset. I've never had that in my mindset. I always work with people with like, with gratitude and and in a way where I'm like, well, I'll try and make it fun and like help them see the meaning in the work, right? Like help them understand why it's an exciting thing to work on or a, why it's right for them, how it connects to their goals and their interests and why it's, you know, fun to contribute, whether it's to a client or to an area of technology or whatever we're working on. It's like, so yeah, I haven't really, I haven't, I mean, you guys might have read books on this, but I haven't really seen that idea articulated in quite the way that I think about it. And because I didn't read it in a book, I just kind of like stumbled across it as a kid. But that's, but I learned because I practiced it for 10 years before I even ended up in the US, when I started managing teams at Yelp, I found that I was very effective as a manager and a leader because I didn't take for granted that, you know, people had to do it because it was their job. I thought of ways to make the environment fun and make the connections between the different team members fun and teach them things and have there be like a culture of success and winning and sharing in the results of the wins together. And I suppose this did play out a little bit financially in my career because, although we pay people well at Yelp, we're kind of a somewhat mature business now. But in the early days of Yelp and in the early days of Quid, I never competed on pay. You know, when you're starting a company, it's a really bad idea to try and compete on pay. You have to, I went into every hiring conversation all the way through my early days at Yelp, as well as through the early days at Quid, like probably the first nearly 10 years at Quid. And every time I interviewed people, I would say early on, this isn't going to be where you earn the most money. I'm not going to be able to pay you market rate. You're going to earn less here than you could elsewhere. However, this is what I can offer you, right? Like whether then I make a culture that's about like helping learning. Like we always had a book like quota at Quid. If you want to buy books to read in your free time, I don't care what the title is, we'll give you money to buy books. And the reality is a book's like 10 bucks or 20 bucks, right? No one spends much on books, but that was one of the perks. I put together these perks so that we were paying often like half of what you could get in the market for the same role, but you're printing like reasons to be there that aren't about the money. Now, it doesn't work for everybody, you know, that's as in every company doesn't, but that's just what played out. And that's really important in the early days. You've got to be so efficient. And then once you start bringing in the money, then you can start moving up your rates and obviously pay people market rate. But early on, you've got to find ways to be really, really, really efficient and really lean. And you can't pay people market rate in the early days. I mean, people kind of expect that going into early stage companies, but I was particularly aggressive on that front. But that was just because I suppose it was in my DNA that like, I will try and give you other reasons to work here, but it's not going to be, it's not going to be for the money.    Nate:  Next, I asked Bob how he got from Yelp to Quid and how he knew it was time to launch his own company.    Bob:  Yeah, like looking back, if I'd made sort of the smart decision from a financial standpoint and from a, you know, career standpoint, I suppose you'd say, I would have just stayed put. if you're in a rocket ship and it's growing and you've got a senior role and you get to, you've got, you've earned the license to work on whatever you want. Like Yelp wanted me to move to Phoenix and create their first remote sales team. They wanted, I was running customer success at the time and I'd set up all those systems. Like there was so much to do. Yelp was only like three or four years old at the time, and it was clearly a rocket ship. And you know, I could have learned a lot more like from Yelp in that, like I could have seen it all the way through to IPO and, setting up remote teams and hiring hundreds of people, thousands of people eventually. So I, but I made the choice to leave relatively early and start my own thing. Just coming back to this idea we talked about in the session earlier today, I I always want to work on the forefront of whatever's going on, like the most important thing happening in our time. And I felt I knew what was next. I could kind of see what was next, which was applying AI to analyze the world's text, which was clear to me by about 2008, like that was going to be as big as the internet. That's kind of how I felt about it. And I told people that, and I put that in articles, and I put it in talks that are online that you can go watch. You know, there's one on my website from 10 years ago where I'd already been in the space for five or six years. You can go watch it and see what I was saying in 2015. So fortunately, I documented this because it sounds a bit, you know, unbelievable given what's just happened with large language models and open AI. But it was clear to me where things were going around 2008. And I just wanted to work on what was next, basically. I wanted to apply neural networks and natural language processing to massive text sets like all the world's media, all the world's social media. And yeah, I suppose whenever I've seen what's going to happen next, like with social network, going to Yelp, like seeing what was going to happen with social networking, going to building Yelp, and then seeing this observation about AI and going and doing Quid, it's not, it doesn't feel like a choice to me. It's felt like, well, just what I have to do. And regardless of whether that's going to be more work, harder work, less money, et cetera, it's just how I'm wired, I guess. And I'm kind of, I see it now. Like I see what's next now. And I'll probably just keep doing this. But I was really too early or very, very early, as you can probably see, to be trying to do that at like 2008, 2009, seven or eight years before OpenAI was founded, I was just banging my head against the wall for nearly a decade with no one that would listen. So even the best companies in the world and the biggest investors in the world, again, I won't name them, But it was so hard to raise money. It was so hard to get anyone to watch it that, after a time, I actually started to think I was wrong. Like after doing it for like 10 years and it hadn't taken off, I just started to think like, I was so wrong. I spent a year or two before ChatGPT took off. I'd got to a point where I'd spent like a year or two just thinking, how could my instinct be so wrong about what was going to play out here? How could we not have unlocked the world's written information at this point? And I started to think maybe it'll never happen, you know, and like I was simply wrong, which of course you could be wrong on these things. And then, you know, ChatGPT and OpenAI like totally blew up, and it's been bigger than even I imagined. And I couldn't have told you exactly which technical breakthrough was going to result in it. Like no one knew that large language models were going to be the unlock. But I played with everything available to try and unlock that value. And as soon as large language models became promising in 2016, we were on it, like literally the month that the Google BERT paper came out, because we were like knocking on that door for many years beforehand. And we were one of the teams that were like, trying to unlock that value. That's why many of the early Quid people are very senior at OpenAI and went on to take what they learned from Quid and then apply it in an OpenAI environment, which I'm very proud of. I'm very proud of those people, and it's amazing to see what they've done.    Nate:  That concludes Chapter 2. In Chapter 3, we discuss AI and social media. The first question was about anxiety and AI.    Bob:  Maybe I'll just focus on the anxiety and the issues first of all. A lot's been said on it. I suppose what would be my headlines? I think that one big area of concern is how it changes the job market. And I think the practical thing on that is if you can learn to be the bridge, then you're putting yourself in a really valuable position, right? Because if you can bridge this technology into businesses in a way that makes change and improvements, then you are moving yourself to a skill set that's going to continue to be really valuable. So that's just a practical matter. One of the executives I work with in a major US company likes to say will doctors become redundant because of AI? And he says, no, doctors won't be redundant, but doctors that don't use AI will be redundant. And that's kind of where we are, right? It's like, we're still going to need a person, but if you refuse, if you're not using it, you're going to fall behind and like that is going to put you at risk. So I think there is some truth to that little kind of illustrative story. There will be massive numbers of jobs that are no longer necessary. And the history of technology is full of these examples. Coming back to like 5,000 years ago, think of all the times that people invented stuff that made the prior roles redundant, right? In London, before electricity was discovered and harnessed, one of the biggest areas of employment was for the people that walked the streets at night, lighting the candles and gas lights that lit London. That was a huge breakthrough, right? You could put fire in the street, you put gas in the street and you lit London. Without that, you couldn't go out at night in London and like it would have been an absolute nightmare. The city wouldn't be what it is. But that meant there were like thousands of people whose job it was to light those candles and then go round in the morning when the sun came up and blow them out. So when the light bulb was invented, can you imagine the uproar in London where all these jobs were going to be lost, thousands of jobs were going to be lost. by people that no longer are needed to put out these lights. There were riots, right? There was massive social upheaval. The light bulb threatened and wiped out those jobs. How many people in London now work lighting gas lamps and lighting candles to light the streets, right? Nobody. That was unthinkable. How could you possibly take away those jobs? You know, people actually smashed these light bulbs when the first electric light bulbs were put into streets. People just went and smashed them because they're like, we are not going to let this technology take our jobs. And I can give you 20 more examples like that throughout history, right? Like you could probably think of loads yourselves. Even the motor car, you know, so many people were employed to look after horses, right? Think of all the people that were employed in major cities around the world, looking after horses and caring for them and building the carts and everything. And suddenly you don't need horses anymore. Like that wiped out an entire industry. But what did it do? It created the automobile industry, which has been employing massive numbers of people ever since. And the same is true for, you know, like what have light bulbs done for the quality of our lives? You know, we don't look at them now and think that's an evil technology that wiped out loads of jobs. We go, thank goodness we've got light bulbs. So the nature of technology is that it wipes out roles, and it creates roles. And I just don't see AI being any different. Humans have no limit to like, seem to have no limit to the comfort they want to live with and the things that we want in our lives. And those things are still really expensive and we don't, we're nowhere near satisfied. So like, we're going to keep driving forward. We're going to go, oh, now we can do that. Great. I can use AI, I can make movies and I can, you know, I don't know, like there's just loads of stuff that people are going to want to do with AI. Like, I mean, using the internet, how much time do we spend on these damn web forms, just clicking links and buttons and stuff? Is that fun? Do we even want to do that? No. Like we're just wasting hours of our lives every week, like clicking buttons. Like if we have agents, they can do that for us. So we have, I think we're a long way from like an optimal state where work is optional and we can just do the things that humans want to do with their time. And so, but that's the journey that I see us all along, you know. So anyway, that's just my take on AI and employment, both practically, what can you do about it? Be the bridge, embrace it, learn it, jump in. And also just like in a long arc, I'm not saying in the short term, there won't be riots and there won't be lots of people out of work. And I mean, there will be. But when we look back again, like I often think about what time period are we talking about? Right? People often like, well, what will it do to jobs? Next year, like there'll certain categories that will become redundant. But are we thinking about this in a one year period or 100 year period? Like it's worth asking yourself, what timeframe am I talking about? Right? And I always try and come back to the 100 year view at a minimum when talking about technology change. If it's better for humanity in 100 years, then we should probably work on it and make it happen, right? If we didn't do that, we wouldn't have any light bulbs in our house. Still be lighting candles?    Nate:  Next was a question about social media, fragmented attention, and how it drives isolation.    Bob:  Well, it's obviously been very problematic, particularly in the last five or six years. So TikTok gained success in the United States and around the world around five or six years ago with a completely new model for how to put content in front of people. And what powered it? AI. So TikTok is really an AI company. And the first touch point that most of us had with AI was actually through TikTok. It got so good at knowing the network of all possible content and knowing if you watch this, is the next thing we should show you to keep you engaged. And they didn't care if you were friends with someone or not. Your network didn't matter. Think about Facebook. Like for those of you that were using Facebook, maybe say 2010, right? Like 15 years ago. What did social media look like? You had a profile page, you uploaded photos of yourself and photos of your friends, you linked between them. And when you logged into Facebook, you basically just browsing people's profiles and seeing what they got up to at the weekend. That was social media 15 years ago. Now imagine, now think what you do when you're on Instagram and you're swiping, right? Or you go to TikTok and you're swiping. First of all, let's move to videos, which is a lot more compelling, short videos. And most of the content has nothing to do with your friends. So there was a massive evolution in social media that happened five or six years ago, driven by TikTok. And all the other companies had to basically adopt the same approach or they would have fallen too far behind. So it forced Meta to evolve Instagram and Facebook to be more about attention. Like there's always about attention, that's the nature of media. But these like AI powered ways to keep you there, regardless of what they're showing you. And that turned out to be a bit of a nightmare because it unleashed loads of content without any sense of like what's good for the people who are watching it, right? That's not the game they're playing. They're playing attention and then they're not making decisions about what might be good for you or not. So we went through like a real dip, I think, in social media, went through a real dip and we're still kind of in it, right, trying to find ways out of it. So regulation will ultimately be the savior, which it is in any new field of tech. Regulation is necessary to keep tech to have positive impact for the people that it's meant to be serving. And that's taken a long time to successfully put in place for social media, but we are getting there. I mean, Australia just banned social media for everyone under 16. You may have seen that. Happened, I think, earlier this year. France is putting controls around it. The UK is starting to put more controls around it. So, you know, gradually countries are voters are making it a requirement to put regulation around social media use. In terms of just practical things for you all, as you think about your own social media use, I think it's very healthy to think about how long you spend on it and find ways to just make it a little harder to access, right? Like none of us feel good when we spend a lot of time on our screens. None of us feel good when we spend a lot of time on social media. It feels good at the time because it's given us those quick dopamine hits. But then afterwards, we're like, man, I spent an hour, and I just like, I lost an hour down like the Instagram wormhole. And then we don't feel good afterwards. It affects us sleep negatively. And yeah, come to the question that was, posted, can create a sense of isolation or negative feelings of self due to comparison to centrally like models and actors and all these people that are like putting out content, right? Kind of super humans. So I think just finding ways to limit it and asking yourself what's right for you and then just sticking to that. And if that means coming off it for a month or coming off it for a couple of months, then, give that a try. Personally, I don't use it much at all. I'll use it mostly because friends will share like a funny meme or something and you just still want to watch it because it's like it's sent to you by a friend. It's a way of interacting. Like my dad sends me funny stuff from the internet, and I want to watch it because it's a way of connecting with him. But then I set a timer. I like to use this timer. It's like just a little physical device. I know we've all got one on our phones, but I like to have one on my desk. And so if I'm going into something, whether it's like I'm going to do an hour on my inbox, my e-mail inbox, or I'm going to, you know, open up Instagram and just swipe for a bit, I'll just set a timer, you know, and just keep me honest, like, okay, I'm going to give myself 8 minutes. I'm not going to give myself any more time on there. So there's limited it. And then I put all these apps in a folder on the second screen of my phone. So I can't easily access them. I don't even see them because they're on the second screen of my phone in a folder called social. So to access any of the apps, I have to swipe, open the folder, and then open the app. And just moving them to a place where I can't see them has been really helpful. I only put the healthy apps on my front page of my phone.    Nate:  Next was a question about where Bob expects AI to be in 20 years and whether there are new levels to be unlocked.    Bob:  No one knows. Right? Like what happens when you take a large language model from a trillion nodes to like 5 trillion nodes? No one knows. It's, this is where the question comes in around like consciousness, for example. Will it be, will it get to a point where we have to consider this entity conscious? Fiercely debated, not obvious at all. Will it become, it's already smarter than, well, it already knows more than any human on the planet. So in terms of its knowledge access, it knows more. In terms of most capabilities, most, you know, cognitive capabilities, it's already more capable than any single human on the planet. But there are certain aspects of consciousness, well, certain cognitive functions that humans currently are capable of that AI is not currently capable of, but we might expect some of those to be eaten into as these large language models get better. And it might be that these large language models have cognitive capabilities that humans don't have and never could have, right? Like levels of strategic thinking, for example, that we just can't possibly mirror. And that's one of the things that's kind of, you know, a concern to nations and to people is that, you know, we could end up with something on the planet that is a lot smarter than any one of us or even all of us combined. So in general, when something becomes more intelligent, it seeks to dominate everything else. That is a pattern. You can see that throughout all life. Nothing's ever got smarter and not sought to dominate. And so that's concerning, especially because it's trained on everything we've ever said and done. So I don't know why that pattern would be different. So that, you know, that's interesting. And and I think in terms of, so the part of that question, which is whole new areas of capability to be unlocked, really fascinating area to look at is not so much the text now, because everything I've written is already in these models, right? So the only way they can get more information is by the fact that like, loads of social networks are creating more information and so on. It's probably pretty duplicitous at this point. That's why Elon bought Twitter, for example, because he wanted the data in Twitter, and he wants that constant access to that data. But how much smarter can they get when they've already got everything ever written? However, large language models, of course, don't just apply to text. They apply to any information, genetics, photography, film, every form of information can be harnessed by these large language models and are being harnessed. And one area that's super interesting is robotics. So the robot is going to be as nimble and as capable as the training data that goes into it. And there isn't much robotic training data yet. But companies are now collecting robotic training data. So in the coming years, robots are going to get way more capable, thanks to large language models, but only as this data gets collected. So in other words, like language is kind of reaching its limits in terms of new capabilities, but think of all the other sensor types that could feed into large language models and you can start to see all kinds of future capabilities, which is why everyone suddenly got so interested in personal transportation vehicles and personal robotics, which is why like Tesla share price is up for example, right? Because Elon's committed now to kind of moving more into robotics with Tesla as a company. And there are going to be loads of amazing robotics companies that come out over the next like 10 or 20 years.    Nate:  And that brings us to the end of this episode with Bob Goodson. Like I mentioned in the intro, there were so many great nuggets from Bob. Such great insight on managing our careers, building companies, and the evolving impact of AI and social media. In summary, try to be at the intersection of new power and real problems. Seek to inspire rather than just transact, and be thoughtful about how to use social media and AI. All simple ideas, please, take them seriously.   

Roie and Notes (from the Notes Reviews YouTube channel) check out albums by bands on their 3rd singer. The parallels between Genesis and Spock's Beard made this an interesting one. What do you think of these albums?

Dustbowl Diatribes and Political Philosophy are podcasts of the Maurin Academy, and can be found on almost all podcast platforms! https://pmaurin.org Maurin Academy Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/maurinacademy John Paul II Catholic Worker Farm: https://jpiicatholicworkerfarm.com Follow the Maurin Academy and the JPII Farm on Instagram for notifications about upcoming events.

Quid Pro Roll is a collaborative independent effort with support from Richmond Comix, and wonderful people like you!! Richmond Comix:  Richmond Comix has been serving the folks of central VA the best comics since 1987. :D | Conveniently located in Arch Village, Richmond VA. Patreon: Coming soon, but not quite ready!! Find our magnificent GM, our scallywag performers, our devoted editor, and supportive supporting composer at the links below! Alex Smith: https://www.facebook.com/richmondcomix Gabriel Perez: https://gabrielperez.bandcamp.com/  Luke Davis: https://linktr.ee/BraveGM  Jenna Garrett: https://linktr.ee/jennachil  Josh Maltby: https://bsky.app/profile/blackcloakdm.bsky.social  Scott Moore: https://linktr.ee/grooveis4life  Join over 1000+ friendly TTRPG nerds and discuss the show over on the Goblins and Growlers Discord! http://bit.ly/goblindiscord  Also, give a listen to our sister podcast, The Goblins and Growlers Podcast, https://goblinsandgrowlers.podbean.com, for TTRPG news, interviews, and discussion.

Election Fraud is back on the table but the game is already over for the guilty. Future riots are being organized, with Seattle being next and Spring-time “No KINGS” nonsense again; I discuss the lack of qualifications from Anisa Liban (the Ohio Somali school-board member in Westerville) and her obvious Quid pro quo; Universities are closing their doors as enrollment plummets; and Arsenic is in major candy brands. Substack: https://theamericanclassroom.substack.com/p/video-westerville-ohio-school-board https://exposingfoodtoxins.com/candy/   Book Websites: HERE and HERE. https://www.moneytreepublishing.com/shop PROMO CODE: “AEFM” for 10% OFF, or https://armreg.co.uk PROMO CODE: "americaneducationfm" for 15% off all books and products. (I receive no kickbacks).  https://www.thriftbooks.com/ Q posts book: https://drive.proton.me/urls/JJ78RV1QP8#yCO0wENuJQPH

durée : 00:03:03 - Un monde connecté - par : François Saltiel - Du ciblage publicitaire à la reconnaissance faciale en passant par les Meta Ray-Ban, les agents de l'ICE déploient en toute impunité un arsenal technologique. Quid de la riposte ?

Les journalistes et experts de RFI répondent également à vos questions sur TikTok sous contrôle américain, l'interdiction des réseaux sociaux pour les mineurs en France et des menaces douanières américaines contre le Canada. Gaza : quelle suite après le rapatriement du dernier otage israélien ?   Plus de deux ans après l'attaque du 7-Octobre, la dépouille de Rane Gvili a été rapatriée lundi (26 janvier 2026) en Israël et enterrée ce mercredi (28 janvier). Il était le dernier des 251 otages enlevés par le Hamas.  Le retour de tous les otages était une condition fixée par le Premier ministre Benjamin Netanyahou pour le lancement de la 2è phase du plan de paix de Donald Trump. Quid, désormais, de la réouverture des frontières de Gaza ? À quand le déploiement de la force internationale de stabilisation prévue dans le plan de paix ? Avec Frédérique Misslin, correspondante permanente de RFI à Jérusalem.     TikTok : un nouveau réseau social « made in USA » ?   Sous la pression de Washington et afin d'éviter son interdiction aux États-Unis, TikTok a cédé la filiale américaine de sa plateforme à un consortium d'investisseurs majoritairement américains. Pourquoi le réseau social chinois a dû passer sous contrôle américain ? Quel impact pour les 200 millions utilisateurs aux États-Unis ? Quelles en sont les conséquences pour Tiktok, côté chinois ? Avec Clea Broadhurst, correspondante permanente de RFI à Pékin.       France : et si les moins de 15 ans vivaient sans réseaux sociaux ?   Les députés français ont voté l'interdiction de l'accès aux réseaux sociaux pour les moins de 15 ans. Cette mesure soutenue par le gouvernement d'Emmanuel Macron vise à protéger les adolescents des risques de cyberharcèlement et des contenus violents. Qu'est-il prévu pour contrôler l'âge des utilisateurs ? Avec Julien Pillot, enseignant-chercheur en économie, spécialiste de l'économie de la régulation numérique à l'INSEEC.       Canada : prochaine cible des sanctions économiques américaines ?   Après les menaces de Donald Trump d'imposer des droits de douane à 100% si le Canada concluait un accord commercial avec la Chine, Ottawa a répliqué en affirmant qu'aucun accord de libre-échange n'avait été négocié avec Pékin. Du coup, comment expliquer les menaces du président américain ? Les Canadiens ont-ils les moyens de résister aux pressions de la Maison Blanche ? Avec Grégory Vanel, expert de la politique économique internationale des États-Unis et professeur à Grenoble École de Management.

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for January 20, 2026 is: quiddity • KWID-uh-tee • noun Quiddity refers to the essence of a thing—that is, whatever makes something the type of thing that it is. Quiddity can also refer to a small and usually trivial complaint or criticism, or to a quirk or eccentricity in someone's behavior. // The novelist's genius was her unparalleled ability to capture the quiddity of the Maine seacoast in simple prose. // He portrayed the character's quirks and quiddities with tender playfulness. See the entry > Examples: “When I was gathering my odes into a book—or rather, piling up my effusions in prose and verse and trying to work out which ones were odes and which weren't—my friend Carlo gave me a magical concept. He called it ‘the odeness.' It's the essential quality, quiddity, … uniqueness of whatever you're trying to write about. It's what your ode is attempting to first identify and then celebrate. It's the odeness of your ode.” — James Parker, The Atlantic, 30 Sept. 2025 Did you know? When it comes to synonyms of quiddity, the Q's have it. Consider quintessence, a synonym of the “essence of a thing” meaning of quiddity, and quibble, a synonym of the “trifling point” use. And let's not forget about quirk: like quiddity, quirk can refer to a person's eccentricities. Of course, quiddity also comes from a “Q” word, the Latin pronoun quis, which is one of two Latin words for “who” (the other is qui). Quid, the neuter form of quis, led to the Medieval Latin quidditas, which means “essence,” a term that was essential to the development of the English word quiddity.

PREVIEW: Rail Sabotage in Poland, Quid Bono? Guest: Gregory Copley John Batchelor speaks with Gregory Copley about the amateur sabotage of a Polish rail line, which Poland blames on Russia, with Copley asking "who benefits" (qui bono), suggesting the easily repaired incident was political and symbolic, recalling the Nord Stream 2 sabotage, initially blamed on Russia but later linked to Ukraine, heightening paranoia about the conflict. 1895 KRAKOW