Podcasts about Norbert Elias

Un drame qui endeuille une nouvelle fois la France. « Mélanie, tuée par un collégien de 14 ans » : le visage de la jeune surveillante est en première page du Parisien. « Le drame de trop », s'exclame le journal. « Comment est-ce possible ? Comment un jeune de 14 ans peut-il poignarder à mort la surveillante de son collège, en présence des gendarmes ? Depuis hier matin, le petit bourg paisible de Nogent en Haute-Marne et toute la France s'interrogent. Aucun village, aucune ville n'est donc à l'abri de cette hyperviolence qui étend peu à peu son linceul. »Déjà fin avril, rappelle Le Monde, « un élève d'un lycée catholique de Nantes avait tué une camarade et blessé trois autres avec un couteau et les agressions de ce type se sont succédé ces derniers mois. Devant l'émoi suscité et la surenchère sécuritaire dont fait preuve une partie de la droite et de l'extrême droite, l'exécutif cherche comment prévenir ces agressions. Mais les solutions se sont révélées jusqu'ici inopérantes, soupire Le Monde, tant il est difficile de sécuriser 12 millions d'élèves et 1,2 million de personnels. Le meurtre d'hier l'a encore prouvé : du lycée privé de centre-ville au collège rural, tous les établissements peuvent être concernés par ces violences, y compris quand ils ne sont pas identifiés comme "à risque". »À lire aussiFrance: une surveillante tuée à coup de couteau par un collégien en Haute-Marne« Trop complexe pour y plaquer un discours de prêt-à-penser sécuritaire »« Sidération » et « tristesse » pour Libération : « La décence oblige a minima à attendre les premières conclusions des enquêteurs, estime le journal. On devrait en savoir plus ce mercredi. C'est d'autant plus nécessaire que la surveillante a été agressée alors que des gendarmes se trouvaient à quelques mètres d'elle, lors d'une opération "inopinée de fouilles de sac", dispositif récemment mis en place par Bruno Retailleau et Élisabeth Borne. C'était après la mort d'un adolescent à proximité d'un lycée de l'Essonne. Cette présence des forces de l'ordre au moment des faits n'invalide évidemment en rien, pointe Libération, la nécessaire réflexion sur les mesures de sécurité à prendre pour éviter que d'autres drames du même ordre se produisent. La prolifération des armes blanches, par exemple, est évidemment une question qu'il faut traiter. Mais la mort de la surveillante du collège Françoise-Dolto de Nogent démontre aussi que ce sujet de la violence en milieu scolaire est trop complexe pour y plaquer un discours de prêt-à-penser sécuritaire. Et que c'est dans le croisement des mailles éducatives et sécuritaires que se niche la bonne réponse. »À lire aussiAprès la mort d'une surveillante tuée par un collégien, l'exécutif français promet des actionsDéconstruction…« Effroi et colère », s'indigne Le Figaro. « Comment les armes, "blanches" ou pas, la violence, la drogue, la pornographie et le sang ont-ils colonisé l'espace et l'esprit de nos enfants, de nos adolescents ? Ni les portiques de sécurité ni les consultations de santé mentale, pour souhaitables qu'ils soient, ne suffiront à endiguer cette effroyable dérive. Penseur du siècle dernier, Norbert Elias décrivait le processus de civilisation et l'intelligence des hommes comme le fruit de la transmission et de l'intériorisation des normes sociales et de la maîtrise de soi. C'est peu dire, soupire Le Figaro, que notre siècle, épris d'une idée dévoyée de la liberté, "déconstruit" toute idée d'autorité ou d'empêchement, d'héritage ou de savoirs… Or, derrière "la mince pellicule de la civilisation", avertissait à sa suite Raymond Aron, guette la barbarie. Qui s'emploiera, enfin, à restaurer cette "mince pellicule" ? »L'arraisonnement du voilier Madleen : une opération com' réussie…À la Une également, l'affaire du voilier humanitaire vers Gaza arraisonné par la marine israélienne hier avec ce commentaire du Temps à Genève : « Certes, cette flottille de la liberté était un pur coup de communication. Mais il a été efficace, relève le quotidien suisse. Il a trusté les antennes, en tout cas en France. Et il a jeté une lumière différente sur un blocus humanitaire inacceptable, dont on a beaucoup parlé, mais sur lequel les analyses commençaient à tourner en rond. Alors que l'on a parfois l'impression que tout a été essayé pour faire plier Benyamin Netanyahu, les matelots d'un jour auront réussi à provoquer d'importantes manifestations en France et ailleurs, pointe encore Le Temps, à forcer les autorités françaises à se positionner encore un peu plus contre ce blocus, bref à maintenir la pression sur le sujet dans certaines opinions publiques européennes. »À lire aussiGaza: Israël intercepte le voilier humanitaire «Madleen», Macron appelle au retour des ressortissants français

Deze week aflevering 47 uit het archief van Springvossen. Op 10 april 2012 sprak Robert van Altena met socioloog Bart van Heerikhuizen (1948-2022) over Het civilisatieproces van socioloog Norbert Elias (1897 Breslau – 1990 Amsterdam). Dit boek uit 1939 verscheen in 2012 bij Uitgeverij Boom in een vertaling van Willem Kranendonk, Han Israëls en anderen. Norbert Elias toont in zijn boek  hoe het menselijk gedrag en de maatschappij in West-Europa door de eeuwen verandert. Bovendien beschrijft hij hoe de veranderingen in de uiterlijke wereld van invloed zijn op het innerlijk van de mens. De periode die het boek beslaat: de negende tot de twintigste eeuw. De term interdependentie, de onderlinge afhankelijk, neemt een centrale rol in in dit werk van Elias. Het vormt het punt van vertrek voor een tocht door de ideeënwereld van Elias, langs elf eeuwen geschiedenis om uiteindelijk terecht te komen bij onszelf. In de woorden van Norbert Elias: “Wij zijn geneigd de ‘beschaving', die op ons de indruk maakt klaar te zijn, te beschouwen als ons eigendom, als iets wat ons afgerond en wel gewoon toekomt, zonder ons af te vragen hoe dat eigenlijk zo gekomen is. Maar de ‘beschaving' is een proces of een deel van een proces dat zich ook over ons uitstrekt.” De volledige titel van het werk luidt: Het Civilisatieproces. Sociogenetische en psychogenetische onderzoekingen. Het verscheen in 1939 bij een kleine Zwitserse uitgeverij als: Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation: soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen (Bazel, Haus Zum Falken, 1939) Afbeelding (detail): De maand januari uit het getijdenboek 'Les Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry' van de Gebroeders van Limburg (Folio 1 verso ), tempera op vellum tempera op vellum, hoogte: 22,5 cm; breedte: 13,6 cm ,(1412-1416) (Collectie: Château de Chantilly). Bron: WikiCommons SPRINGVOSSEN
 redactie + presentatie: Robert van Altena
 contact: springvossen[at]gmail.com
  https://linktr.ee/springvossen 
www.amsterdamfm.nl/programma/springvossen

Avec Gilberto Villaroel, Floriane Soulas et Patrick K. Dewdney.Animation : Anne Canoville et Benjamin Bolchegeek Dans l'utopie écologiste d'Ecotopia d'Ernest Callenbach, écrite dans les années 70, la société très pacifique s'adonne paradoxalement à des jeux de guerre extrêmement violents, comme pour expurger du collectif les pulsions de compétition et de domination par l'entremise d'une pratique rituelle. Cet exemple parmi d'autres (comme “The lottery” de Shirley Jackson) a de quoi choquer, à l'instar du journaliste William Weston assistant à ces jeux pour la première fois dans le roman de Callenbach. Si, comme l'exposent les sociologues Norbert Elias et Eric Dunning dans Sport et civilisation : la violence maîtrisée (1994), la compétition sportive a pu être une manière de canaliser la violence des sociétés en la rejouant dans la compétition sportive selon un cadre policé, comment comprendre celle qui éclate dans les oeuvres de science-fiction mettant en scène des sports brutaux ou même des jeux de la mort ? Pourquoi la SF privilégie-t-elle l'exposition de jeux systématiquement violents ? Spectateur·ices et lecteur·ices de ces œuvres, nous ne sommes pas directement confronté·es à la violence des jeux, mais bien à des représentations de celle-ci : alors, que nous disent-elles ? S'enracinent-elles dans une conception particulièrement brutale du sport, nombre de ces productions étant originaires des Etats-Unis ? Dans l'expression d'une violence sociale réelle, refoulée derrière les écrans et les vitrines que sont les Coupes du Monde et les Jeux Olympiques ? Dans les symptômes d'une société qui conçoit les rapports humains comme une compétition féroce entre les individus, proche du darwinisme social ? Au centre de nos questionnements sur la thématique « Du Pain et des jeux », cette table-ronde clôturera le cycle programmé par l'équipe du festival. Table ronde dans le cadre de la 12e édition du festival Les Intergalactiques "Du Pain et des Jeux" le samedi 20 avril 2024.

Weinig denkers hebben zo'n grote invloed gehad op het denken over de samenleving als Norbert Elias. Wat is vandaag de dag, vijfendertig jaar na zijn dood, de intellectuele betekenis van de grondlegger van de civilisatietheorie? Dit bespreken we samen met Christien Brinkgreve, Abram de Swaan, Tahrim Ramdjan en Arjan Post.Snot, speeksel, toiletgewoontes en tafelmanieren, ze vormden het onderzoeksterrein van Norbert Elias. Door in te zoomen op hoe alledaagse, banale rituelen en omgangsvormen door de eeuwen steeds strikter werden, wierp Elias een nieuwe blik op de eeuwenlange ontwikkeling van de beschaving, vooral in Europa. Hij zag daarin een nauwe samenhang tussen processen van statenvorming en veranderingen in menselijke beleving en gedrag.In zijn magnus opus Het civilisatieproces beargumenteert Elias hoe we steeds gevoeliger werden voor vuil, naaktheid en geweld. Elias analyseerde hoe men zich vanaf de middeleeuwen begon te reguleren en te spiegelen aan de gedragsnormen van de hofelite. Zo koppelde Elias het intieme en persoonlijke aan een omvattende politieke en maatschappelijke meta-analyse. Daarmee werd Elias een van de invloedrijkste sociologen van de twintigste eeuw. Met name in Nederland, waar Elias zijn laatste jaren doorbracht, verwierf zijn denken veel aanhang. We bespreken welke zeggingskracht Elias' werk vandaag de dag heeft. Kan het denken van Elias helpen om populistische tendensen in de westerse wereld te duiden? En hoe problematisch is zijn eurocentrische blik op de beschaving? Zijn we echt gevoeliger geworden voor geweld, zoals Elias betoogde, of is geweld juist inherent onderdeel van de westerse moderniteit?Norbert Elias werd 1897 in het Duitse Breslau (tegenwoordig Wrocław, Polen) geboren. In 1933 vluchtte de Joodse Elias eerst naar Frankrijk en later het Verenigd Koninkrijk. In 1939 publiceerde hij zijn bekendste en meest invloedrijke werk Over het civilisatieproces. De laatste jaren van zijn leven bracht hij in Amsterdam door. Elias is van grote invloed geweest op Nederlandse sociologen als Joop Goudsblom en Abram de Swaan. Elias overleed in 1990.Publieke Intellectuelen wordt mede mogelijk gemaakt door VfondsZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

“I just make the time to read a book and it gives me this burst of fire in the belly to give me another two or three hours of creativity or productivity.” This cry of passion by author Robin Sharma is a call to arms four HEC researchers have heard throughout their respective careers. Gilles Deleuze, Norbert Elias, Sherry Turkle and E.O. Wilson are so many references inspiring our academics in their devotion to further their disciplines. They share their passion for books in this first Breakthroughs podcast of 2025. Find the written highlights in Knowledge@HEC here. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Partiendo de una realidad política que es, al mismo tiempo, artística y cultural, el libro Ars Hasburgica revisa el concepto historiográfico del Renacimiento. Hasta hace unos años, este periodo se entendía desde una perspectiva geográficamente italocéntrica, muy próxima al lenguaje clásico y políticamente centrada en la idea de las "artes nacionales" y las "escuelas regionales". Sin embargo, los últimos estudios certifican que el Renacimiento es un fenómeno global y complejo. Esta publicación ofrece una visión del arte que estudia el papel desempeñado por la dinastía de los Habsburgo y sus diversas cortes, intentando verificar si, al aplicar otros modelos historiográficos y al tener como enfoque el arte de la Casa de Austria, las ideas tradicionales pueden defenderse ante la comprensión del pasado en el siglo XXI. Los editores mencionan el llamado "paradigma de Vasari" que, en gran medida, es el fundamento para la historia del arte del siglo XVI escrita a lo largo de los últimos siglos. La publicación también busca definiciones de los fenómenos artísticos, no tanto en torno a naciones e identidades de las artes, sino planteando estos temas a través de ideas relacionadas con la Corte como esfera política, artística y cultural, partiendo de los estudios de Norbert Elias, Amedeo Quondam o Carlo Ossola.  Miguel Ángel Zalama es Catedrático y director del Departamento de Historia del Arte en la Universidad de Valladolid (España), así como director del Centro Tordesillas para las Relaciones con América Latina. Tras concluir la tesis doctoral. realizó estancias tanto en el Institute of Fine Arts de la Universidad de Nueva York, donde trabajó con Jonathan Brown, así como en la Universidad de La Sapienza en Roma, en la Université Catholique de l'Ouest, Angers (Francia), y en la Universidad de Monterrey (México).  Fernando Checa, es Catedrático de Historia del Arte en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Ha sido Director del Museo Nacional del Prado (1996-2001), y Premio Nacional de Historia de España (1993). Ha comisariado exposiciones sobre la Casa de Austria en Madrid, Viena, París, Gante, Bruselas, Toledo o Puebla de los Ángeles (México). También ha sido Senior Fellow Paul Mellon en CASVA (Washington) y Profesor Visitante en la Université de Genève (Suiza) y en la Universidad Estatal de Oklahoma.  CINTER (Corte, Imagen, Nobleza y Territorio) es un grupo de investigación de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (https://www.proyectocinter.com/). La entrevista sobre la publicación Ars Habsburgica se realiza con Miguel Ángel Zalama, editor de la publicación, y Jesús Pascual Molina, autor de uno de los capítulos de la misma. Presenta Oskar J. Rojewski, profesor de Historia del Arte con especialización en el Arte Flamenco de la Baja Edad Media y el Renacimiento. Se le puede encontrar en X.com como @oscarro90 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Partiendo de una realidad política que es, al mismo tiempo, artística y cultural, el libro Ars Hasburgica revisa el concepto historiográfico del Renacimiento. Hasta hace unos años, este periodo se entendía desde una perspectiva geográficamente italocéntrica, muy próxima al lenguaje clásico y políticamente centrada en la idea de las "artes nacionales" y las "escuelas regionales". Sin embargo, los últimos estudios certifican que el Renacimiento es un fenómeno global y complejo. Esta publicación ofrece una visión del arte que estudia el papel desempeñado por la dinastía de los Habsburgo y sus diversas cortes, intentando verificar si, al aplicar otros modelos historiográficos y al tener como enfoque el arte de la Casa de Austria, las ideas tradicionales pueden defenderse ante la comprensión del pasado en el siglo XXI. Los editores mencionan el llamado "paradigma de Vasari" que, en gran medida, es el fundamento para la historia del arte del siglo XVI escrita a lo largo de los últimos siglos. La publicación también busca definiciones de los fenómenos artísticos, no tanto en torno a naciones e identidades de las artes, sino planteando estos temas a través de ideas relacionadas con la Corte como esfera política, artística y cultural, partiendo de los estudios de Norbert Elias, Amedeo Quondam o Carlo Ossola.  Miguel Ángel Zalama es Catedrático y director del Departamento de Historia del Arte en la Universidad de Valladolid (España), así como director del Centro Tordesillas para las Relaciones con América Latina. Tras concluir la tesis doctoral. realizó estancias tanto en el Institute of Fine Arts de la Universidad de Nueva York, donde trabajó con Jonathan Brown, así como en la Universidad de La Sapienza en Roma, en la Université Catholique de l'Ouest, Angers (Francia), y en la Universidad de Monterrey (México).  Fernando Checa, es Catedrático de Historia del Arte en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Ha sido Director del Museo Nacional del Prado (1996-2001), y Premio Nacional de Historia de España (1993). Ha comisariado exposiciones sobre la Casa de Austria en Madrid, Viena, París, Gante, Bruselas, Toledo o Puebla de los Ángeles (México). También ha sido Senior Fellow Paul Mellon en CASVA (Washington) y Profesor Visitante en la Université de Genève (Suiza) y en la Universidad Estatal de Oklahoma.  CINTER (Corte, Imagen, Nobleza y Territorio) es un grupo de investigación de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (https://www.proyectocinter.com/). La entrevista sobre la publicación Ars Habsburgica se realiza con Miguel Ángel Zalama, editor de la publicación, y Jesús Pascual Molina, autor de uno de los capítulos de la misma. Presenta Oskar J. Rojewski, profesor de Historia del Arte con especialización en el Arte Flamenco de la Baja Edad Media y el Renacimiento. Se le puede encontrar en X.com como @oscarro90 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Partiendo de una realidad política que es, al mismo tiempo, artística y cultural, el libro Ars Hasburgica revisa el concepto historiográfico del Renacimiento. Hasta hace unos años, este periodo se entendía desde una perspectiva geográficamente italocéntrica, muy próxima al lenguaje clásico y políticamente centrada en la idea de las "artes nacionales" y las "escuelas regionales". Sin embargo, los últimos estudios certifican que el Renacimiento es un fenómeno global y complejo. Esta publicación ofrece una visión del arte que estudia el papel desempeñado por la dinastía de los Habsburgo y sus diversas cortes, intentando verificar si, al aplicar otros modelos historiográficos y al tener como enfoque el arte de la Casa de Austria, las ideas tradicionales pueden defenderse ante la comprensión del pasado en el siglo XXI. Los editores mencionan el llamado "paradigma de Vasari" que, en gran medida, es el fundamento para la historia del arte del siglo XVI escrita a lo largo de los últimos siglos. La publicación también busca definiciones de los fenómenos artísticos, no tanto en torno a naciones e identidades de las artes, sino planteando estos temas a través de ideas relacionadas con la Corte como esfera política, artística y cultural, partiendo de los estudios de Norbert Elias, Amedeo Quondam o Carlo Ossola.  Miguel Ángel Zalama es Catedrático y director del Departamento de Historia del Arte en la Universidad de Valladolid (España), así como director del Centro Tordesillas para las Relaciones con América Latina. Tras concluir la tesis doctoral. realizó estancias tanto en el Institute of Fine Arts de la Universidad de Nueva York, donde trabajó con Jonathan Brown, así como en la Universidad de La Sapienza en Roma, en la Université Catholique de l'Ouest, Angers (Francia), y en la Universidad de Monterrey (México).  Fernando Checa, es Catedrático de Historia del Arte en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Ha sido Director del Museo Nacional del Prado (1996-2001), y Premio Nacional de Historia de España (1993). Ha comisariado exposiciones sobre la Casa de Austria en Madrid, Viena, París, Gante, Bruselas, Toledo o Puebla de los Ángeles (México). También ha sido Senior Fellow Paul Mellon en CASVA (Washington) y Profesor Visitante en la Université de Genève (Suiza) y en la Universidad Estatal de Oklahoma.  CINTER (Corte, Imagen, Nobleza y Territorio) es un grupo de investigación de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (https://www.proyectocinter.com/). La entrevista sobre la publicación Ars Habsburgica se realiza con Miguel Ángel Zalama, editor de la publicación, y Jesús Pascual Molina, autor de uno de los capítulos de la misma. Presenta Oskar J. Rojewski, profesor de Historia del Arte con especialización en el Arte Flamenco de la Baja Edad Media y el Renacimiento. Se le puede encontrar en X.com como @oscarro90 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

La muerte juega un papel axial en nuestras vidas. El ser humano muere un poco cada instante en el que las manecillas del reloj avanzan. El ejercicio de pensar la muerte involucra el ejercicio de pensar y, claro, de pensar la vida. Pensar la muerte, pensarse uno en su propia mortalidad, es un ejercicio sumamente revelador, que ensancha nuestra existencia y la torna más plena y auténtica. Apoyándose e inspirándose en grandes personalidades como Arthur Schopenhauer, Byung-Chul Han, Edgar Morin, Elias Canetti, Emmanuel Lévinas, Fernando Pessoa, Julián Marías, Martin Heidegger, Norbert Elias, Philippe Ariès, Séneca, Sigmund Freud y un largo etcétera, el autor cavila sobre la muerte y sus múltiples caras. El resultado es una obra singular, que trasciende cualquier tipo de morbo y resulta extremadamente provechosa y esclarecedora para cualquiera de nosotros. «Uno tiene la sensación de que todo el mundo debería alguna vez leer este libro». ALEJANDRO ROJAS AUTOR Alejandro G. J. Peña (Málaga, 1993) es escritor y profesor de la Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (España), donde imparte clases en el grado de Psicología de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad de Sevilla. Actualmente, realiza su segunda tesis doctoral en Comunicación por las Universidades de Málaga, Sevilla, Cádiz y Huelva. Cursó los másteres en Filosofía, Ciencia y Ciudadanía y en Ciencias Cognitivas. Sus líneas de investigación discurren en las áreas de la tanatología y de la antropología y filosofía de la muerte; leitmotiv, además, de su obra más personal enmarcada en la literatura y la poesía. Subdirector de la revista de filosofía Claridades y autor de múltiples artículos de investigación y libros, entre los que ha ejercido de editor y coordinador. Revista digital La tortuga Avui. www.latortugaavui.com Redes: Instagram: area-hermetica-radio. Facebook grupo Secrets del Pirineu Telegram: [https://t.me/.../FSW-COI...//t.me/joinchat/FSW-COI-ZiUtQ0Aj) Ràdio Caldes 107.8 fm, Radio Granollers a la carta, por TDT para las comarcas del Vallès canal 515 y por internet: www.radiocaldes.cat y Ràdio Granollers a la carta. areahermeticaradio@gmail

Orta Çağ, Aydınlanma döneminde ortaya çıkan fikirleri yansıtabilecek en önemli kavramlardan biridir. Aydınlanma dönemi filozoflarının fikir dünyası üzerinde çalışanlar, eğer öğrenci pozisyonundan kurtulmazlarsa dönem hakkında fikir yürütürken belirli şablonların dışına çıkamayacaklardır. Bu da Orta Çağ kavramının temsil ettiği dönem hakkında farklı fikirlere geçit vermeyecektir. Bugün Türkiye'de hâlâ Orta Çağ karanlığı gibi Aydınlanma dönemi kavramlarının yaygın bir şekilde kullanılması farklı fikirlere geçit verilmemesinin baş sebebidir. Hâlbuki bugünkü Avrupa Orta Çağ olarak bilinen bu uzun dönemde şekillenmişti. Tabiri caizse Avrupa'nın çocukluk dönemi Orta Çağ'dır ve onlar için bu dönem hiçbir zaman kaybolmayacaktır. Ne zaman çocukluk dönemine inmek isteseler muhakkak Orta Çağ'a bakacaklardır. O zaman Avrupa kavramının kuşatıcı bir kimlik olarak çok yeni olduğu daha iyi anlaşılır. Norbert Elias, kültür ve uygarlık arasındaki farkı kolonyal yayılmacılık ekseninde tartışmıştı. Avrupa'da milliyetçilik kavramı aynı eksende tartışılır. Aydınlanma filozlarının fikirlerini kolonyal yayılmacılık dönemi bağlamında açıklamak herhalde ufuk açıcı olacaktır. Neredeyse bütün tanımlamalar aksi yöndeki fikirleri ifade etse de Avrupa fikri çok sağlam temeller üzerine inşa edilmemiştir. Bugün bunu çok daha iyi görüyoruz. Anglosakson, Norman, Germen, Slav, Grek ve Latin kavramalarının daha fazla öne çıkacağı bir döneme doğru gittiğimiz çok açıktır. Avrupa kavramı emperyal bir vizyonu yansıtmaktaydı. Kendi içinde birbiriyle rekabet eden ve uzun savaşların sonunda mutabakatlarla belirlenen merkezler vardı. Bu merkezleri aynı kategoriye dâhil etmek kolay değildi. On dokuzuncu yüzyılda en önemli merkez Londra idi. Avrupa Birliği gibi oluşumları da bu merkezlerden birinin hâkimiyeti çerçevesinde anlamak gerekir. Yahudi-Hıristiyan medeniyeti kavramı sorgulamadan muaf değildir. Hem Avrupa Birliği hem Yahudi-Hıristiyan medeniyeti Anglosakson imzasını taşır. Bunların dönemine göre kuşatıcı kavramlar olarak sunulması şaşırtıcıydı. Yahudi-Hıristiyan medeniyeti kavramı bugün hâlâ sorgulanmamaktadır. ABD ve İsrail Yahudi-Hıristiyan medeniyetlerinin uzlaşmasının bir sonucu mudur yoksa bu iki kolonyal yapı Anglosakson emperyalizminin başarı hanesine mi yazılmalıdır? Bu sorunun ciddiyetle tartışılması gerekir. Bu iki kolonyal devlet, Anglosakson yayılmacılığının eseridir ve kendi içinde birçok ortak özelliğe sahiptir. İkisi de Anglosaksonların yerleşimci kolonyalizminin bütün özelliklerini üzerinde taşımaktadır. İkisi de yayılmacıdır ve başarılarının temelinde etnik temizlik vardır.

The European football championships have kicked off, so it's time to talk sports! Join Olivia and Aran as they crack open a cold one or several and take a look at the long history of football in Europe, as well as the almost-as-long history of football hooliganism. In doing so, we will try to understand why there have been so many attempts to ban the sport....that is to say, why every attempt to do so has failed!For more on some of what we discuss, check out:Quest for excitement : sport and leisure in the civilizing process (Chapter 5) by Norbert Elias and Eric Dunning https://archive.org/details/questforexciteme00elia/Football in Medieval England and in Middle-English Literature by F.P. Magoun, Jr.https://www.jstor.org/stable/1838470Sport and Social Hierarchy in Medieval England by Thomas S. Henrickshttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43609079Two poems about James Dog by William Dunbarhttps://allpoetry.com/poem/15427673-Of-James-Dog--Madame--ye-heff-a-dangerous-dog--by-William-Dunbar

Sonst sind Erwachsene oft für Ruhe und Besonnenheit, beim Fußball aber brüllen und schimpfen sie wie verrückt. Wie kann das sein? Die Professoren Durkheim und Luhmann können es erklären.

In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did.

La agencia de detectives más famosa de la radio española, capitaneada por el filósofo José Antonio Marina, abre sus minutos de investigación con todas las propuestas y opiniones que nos han hecho llegar los escuchantes alrededor del acoso escolar a petición de nuestro colaborador. Algunos nos comentan que el silencio es el gran aliado de los acosadores y que hay que animar a las víctimas a que lo cuenten. Otros, como un escuchante que nos sigue desde Orleans (Francia), nos cuenta que allí están muy preocupados y que van a introducir “educación emocional”, especialmente enfocada en la empatía. Y aunque nuestro caso de la semana pasada (el acoso escolar) aún no está cerrado, es el momento de asumir nuevos retos. Parece que los “buenos modales” no están de moda. Dicen ahora que “hay que ser auténtico” y además las nuevas tecnologías fomentan un trato brusco. Sin embargo, lo que coloquialmente se ha venido llamando buena educación ha importado. Y mucho, especialmente si tenemos en cuenta que un gran historiador como Norbert Elias estudió la historia de la urbanidad como una señal de progreso de la civilización. Nuestra tarea de la próxima semana, investigadores, tiene que ver con los buenos modales. Quizá ha llegado el momento de elaborar un código de urbanidad en línea con los tiempos…   Escuchar audio

Diretamente das terras distantes da Hungria moderna, em regiões de nome impronunciável para nossa bancada, a condessa sangrenta Erzsébet Báthory, ou Elizabeth Bathory para os amantes da língua inglesa, foi responsável por anos de terror e inúmeras vítimas na virada do século XVI para o século XVII. A lenda tornou-se maior do que a personagem histórica. Vampira, bruxa, assassina, torturadora, sádica, imortal… Em meio a tantos mitos, o RdMCast dessa semana explora a história da condessa de sangue e as diversas adulterações que se deram ao longo de séculos para criar a imagem da assassina que se banhava em sangue de virgens. Pegue sua espada, seu cavalo e junte-se a nós na busca pela história de Erzsébet Báthory. O RdMCast é produzido e apresentado por: Gabriel Braga, Gabi Larocca e Thiago Natário. Apoie o RdM e receba recompensas exclusivas: https://apoia.se/rdm ou https://app.picpay.com/user/republicadomedo CITADOS NO PROGRAMA: Infamous Lady: The True Story of Countess Erzsébet Báthory – Kimberly Craft The Private Letters of Countess Erzsébet Báthory – Kimberly Craft A Condessa Drácula (1971) Báthory (2008) A Condessa (2009) Chastity Bites (2013) CITAÇÕES OFF TOPIC: Coração Valente (1995) Escravas do Desejo (1971) A Solidão dos Moribundos – livro, Norbert Elias (1982) EPISÓDIOS CITADOS: RdMCast #330 – American Horror Story (Temporadas 4-6) Siga o RdM Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/Rep%C3%BAblicadoMedo Instagram: @republicadomedo Twitter: @Rdmcast Entre em contato através do: contato@republicadomedo.com.br PODCAST EDITADO POR Felipe Lourenço ESTÚDIO GRIM – Design para conteúdo digital Portfólio: https://www.behance.net/estudiogrim Instagram: @estudiogrim Contato: designgrim@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

durée : 00:43:35 - Signes des temps - par : Marc Weitzmann - Chacun voit la décivilisation à l'œuvre selon la conception qu'il se fait de son contraire. "Décivilisation" le mot employé à tort et à travers, est donc un signe de l'angoisse des Temps. Mais comment Norbert Elias l'employait-il, et pourquoi son œuvre résonne-t-elle aujourd'hui ? - invités : Cédric Moreau de Bellaing sociologue; Nathalie Heinich Sociologue, directrice de recherche au CNRS (Centre national de la recherche scientifique)

If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand  Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand  Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand  Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/southeast-asian-studies

If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand  Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology

If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand  Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand  Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network.

If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand  Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day

In dieser Folge fragen wir uns, ob das Laufen als eine Art Türöffner zum "wahren Selbst" dienen kann. Findet eine Form der Demaskierung statt an deren Ende der rohe innere Kern unserer Persönlichkeit zum Vorschein kommt? Des Weiteren debattieren wir die oftmals synonyme Verwendung der beiden Begriffe Joggen und Laufen. Meinen die beiden Wörter das gleiche oder gibt es Unterschiede? Christian berichtet vom eigenen Training im knietiefen Schnee und Juliane problematisiert die Unmöglichkeit für Frauen aufgrund einer Schwangerschaft einen Startplatz kostenfrei ins nächste Jahr zu übertragen.

In this conversation with Kasia Krzyżanowska, Johannes Voelz discusses his theory of the aesthetics of populism, explains how Pierre Bourdieu and Norbert Elias can help us understand contemporary populism, elaborates on the concept of a (Trump) rally, talks about the culture of a dichotomized world, and shares his insights on the role of culture in helping to ease the deep political conflicts.

Prof. Dr. Fritz Bernhard Simon, fbs: Zunächst Studium der Medizin und Soziologie sowie im Anschluss Ausbildung zum Psychiater und Psychoanalytiker. Mitgründer des Heidelberger Instituts für systemische Forschung, Therapie und Beratung. 1982-1989 - Mehrere Jahre leitender Oberarzt der psychoanalytischen Abteilung an der Heidelberger Universität sowie späterhin von 1999-2004 Professor für Führung und Organisation am Wittener Institut für Familienunternehmen (Universität Witten-Herdecke). Zudem Mitgründer und Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter des Carl-Auer-Verlags, Heidelberg, und Mitgründer des Organisationsberatungsunternehmens Simon, Weber & Friends GmbH. Obendrein ein höchst produktiver Verfasser von Fachbüchern und -artikeln zu allen relevanten Aspekten von Beratungsarbeit in unserer Zeit.

Was bedeutet Deutsch sein? Angeregt durch die Aussagen der Union und FDP, der deutsche Pass solle nicht “verramscht” werden, in Bezug auf die Bestrebungen der Ampelregierung das Einbürgerungsrecht zu reformieren, haben Samira und Friedemann sich über den “Wert” der Staatsbürgerschaft ausgetauscht. Beide erzählen von ihrem Aufwachsen, mit und ohne deutschen Pass, wie gut sich Stempel anhören und nähern sich den Fiktionen nationaler Identität und vermeintlicher Geburtsrechte mithilfe der Philosophinnen Donatella Di Cesare und Hannah Arendt und der Soziologen Steffen Mau und Norbert Elias. Was hat es mit der Idee des Deutschseins, der Integration (Integration in was?) und der Nation an sich auf sich? Passend dazu stellte Erik Marquardt diese Woche die Frage nach den Narrativen nationaler Identität. Bücher und Referenzen Steffen Mau: Sortiermaschinen - Die Neuerfindung der Grenze im 21. Jahrhundert: https://www.chbeck.de/mau-sortiermaschinen/product/32405836 Donatella Di Cesare im Gespräch mit Wolfram Eilenberger in Sternstunde Philosophie auf YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtFeyO8gYEk Ihr Buch "Philosophie der Migration": https://www.matthes-seitz-berlin.de/buch/philosophie-der-migration.html Norbert Elias, John L. Scotson: Etablierte und Außenseiter: https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/etablierte-und-aussenseiter-t-9783518383827 (Leseprobe hier abrufbar: https://www.transcript-verlag.de/media/pdf/20/45/b8/ts5092_1.pdf) Es gibt bei Steady jetzt die Option, dass man Piratensender Powerplay Premium-Mitgliedschaften verschenken kann, also falls ihr noch ein Weihnachtsgeschenk sucht, werft gerne einen Blick in “Gift a Membership” weiter unten auf https://steadyhq.com/en/piratensenderpowerplay/about :) Frohe Adventszeit!

Piše: Leonora Flis Bere: Igor Velše Knjiga Blaža Kosovela Zakaj ZDA nimajo ministrstva za kulturo temelji na avtorjevi disertaciji Rojstvo postmodernizma iz duha Amerike. Znanstveni temelji monografije so očitni. Knjiga je natančen sociološki, zgodovinski in kulturološko-antropološki pregled ne le razvoja ZDA, temveč tega, čemur pravimo civilizacija nasploh. Kosovel začne svojo analizo v antičnem Rimu in nas prek najpomembnejših postaj v evropski zgodovini popelje v ZDA. Kot avtor že v uvodu pove, so ZDA resnično zanimiv primerek države, ki svojo kulturo izvaža po vsem svetu, ob tem pa nima ministrstva za kulturo. ZDA niso zgrajene po enakih načelih kot evropske države, predvsem gre v njih za logiko ekonomske svobode in svetosti zasebne lastnine. Prvi del knjige ima naslov Rim: cultura, civis in religio, drugi del z naslovom Evropa: moderna družba, civilizacija in kultura se osredotoča na staro celino, tretji del pa, kot že rečeno, v precep vzame nastanek in razvoj Amerike in ima naslov ZDA: Nova civilizacija. Kosovel z akademsko dikcijo (knjiga vsebuje veliko citatov in sprotnih opomb) ustvari kompleksno sliko razlike med staro celino in ZDA, pri tem se opira na velika imena, kot so John Locke, Norbert Elias, Benedict Anderson, Zygmunt Bauman, Hannah Arendt, Michel Foucault in drugi. Kot pravi Hannah Arendt, se je »koncept kulture najprej pojavil sredi prvenstveno poljedelskega ljudstva in umetniške konotacije, ki so bile morebiti povezane s to kulturo, so zadevale tesno povezavo latinskih ljudi z naravo«. Od nekdaj je kultura je označevala tudi skrb za spomenike in za ohranjanje dediščine. Stari Grki pa so raje kot o kulturi govorili o umetnosti. Polis je kraj (mesto), kjer je umetnost mogoča; starogrški svet je bil svet slavne sedanjosti, pravi Kosovel, in ne dediščine preteklosti. Pravi koncept kulture nastane z namenom oblikovanja privatnega prostora, tako v smislu zemlje v zasebni lasti kot tudi lastne duše. Kultura, kot jo poznamo na evropski celini, je torej najprej stvar privatnosti in ne splošne javnosti. Kosovel se ustavi tudi pri renesančnem oblikovanju individuuma, ki ni le abstrakten filozofski koncept, ampak drugačno vedenje v medosebnih odnosih in v razumevanju samega sebe. V renesansi se slog zahodnega sveta oblikuje na dvorih, začne se tudi tekma v kulturnem prestižu, tekma v tem, kdo pozna in lahko vabi boljše umetnike in kulturne ustvarjalce. V knjigi Zakaj ZDA nimajo ministrstva za kulturo beremo: »Rafiniranje in kultiviranje je odmikanje od vsega, kar je razumljeno kot naravno, v svet umetno ustvarjenega, posredovanega, svet, ki je postavljen kot višji in zato tudi boljši in pomembnejši.« Šele z novim vekom se razumevanje kulture zasnuje tako, da se kulturo razume kot nekaj, kar se lahko prenese tudi na množice, da ni nujno zgolj domena elit. Narod je torej mogoče kultivirati ali civilizirati, eno od osnovnih orodij za dosega tega cilja je seveda izobraževanje. Kultura je bila za Evropo od samega začetka pojem za preoblikovanje ali kultiviranje ljudi na določenem ozemlju države, pojasnjuje Kosovel, kultura je bila način homogenizacije prebivalstva. Če v Evropi veljajo tudi pravila dedne aristokracije, v ZDA ni bilo tako. Dedne aristokracije tam ni, vse od samega formiranja države pa vlada načelo oblikovanja nove čistosti, privilegiranosti bele rase. Ameriška družba je zgrajena na fundamentalno drugačnih temeljih kot evropska in zato kulture pravzaprav ni potrebovala. Vzpostavljanje ideje nove čistosti seveda prinese s seboj ropanje, genocid, zasužnjevanje lokalnega prebivalstva in suženjske delovne sile iz Afrike. Amerika je utemeljena na rasni hierarhiji in belem supremacizmu. Tako Kosovel pojasnjuje temelje, na katerih so se oblikovale ZDA (skozi migracije, kolonizacijo, segregacijo in tako dalje). Institucija kulture v ZDA umanjka, saj je poudarek na političnih institucijah, ki favorizirajo pridobivanje nove lastnine, in na idealih, kot sta svoboda govora in svoboda zavesti. Namesto kulture, piše Kosovel, obstajajo ameriške sanje«. Ameriškega naroda ne ustvarjajo humanistični intelektualci, temveč inženirji in znanstveniki. Kljub temu se je konec 19. stoletja tudi v ZDA oblikovala visoka kultura, ki je namenjena elitam, denar zanjo pa priskrbijo bogati kultivirani posamezniki. Tudi vzpostavljanje kulturnih institucij (knjižnic, muzejev ...) poteka mimo oziroma neodvisno od javnih ustanov. Administracija, torej vladna sekcija ZDA, pa je vendarle pograbila tisto manj zahtevno, množično kulturo, ki jo ZDA oblikujejo, to je predvsem kultura potrošništva, ki so jo ZDA izvozile praktično povsod po svetu. Kultura je v ZDA postala še ena oblika ekonomije, prostor konzumacije. Izvažanju množične kulture smo priča vsak dan, amerikanizacija je preplavila svet. Blaž Kosovel dobro in prepričljivo utemeljuje svojo tezo, ki jo je izpostavil v naslovu knjige, tako da je natančno preučil oblikovanje ZDA in ga primerjal z oblikovanjem evropskih nacionalnih držav. Za Evropo je »kultura tisto mesto, ki legitimira oblikovanje narodov s tem, da oblikuje skupno zgodovino,« ugotavlja. Ameriški narod pa se je oblikoval predvsem kot ideja za prihodnost. Kredo, na katerem je utemeljena Amerika, je sekularizirana oblika protestantizma; ZDA ne potrebujejo ničesar drugega kot institucije, ki omogočajo prosti trg, ekonomsko svobodo; kultura, ki bi zasedala polje javnega, je torej nepotrebna. Kosovelovo delo Zakaj ZDA nimajo ministrstva za kulturo je izčrpno, ne sicer najlažje branje, ki prinaša pronicljive vpoglede in analize.

Najnowszy odcinek podcastu #2historykow1mikrofon pt. "Otwarta dyplomacja" jest dostępny online. Spotkanie rozpoczęliśmy od wnikliwej analizy podróży jednego z nas. W części poświęconej nowym starożytnościom jeden z nas opowiadał o specyficznych pomnikach indywidualnej pamięci. Drugi z nas opowiadał o skomplikowanych drogach podniebnych trunków i wartości dodanej wafelków. W ramach opowieści o książkach jeden z nas przedstawiał niepozorną a ważną i odważną publikację poświęconą administracji wczesnopiastowskiej. Drugi z nas opowiadał o specyficznej monografii korygującej biografię klasyka myśli socjologicznej blisko związanego z historią. W zasadniczej części odcinka zastanawialiśmy się nad rolą dyplomacji w dziejach i współczesności wspólnot ludzkich. Bardzo mocno akcentowaliśmy znaczenie organizacji i realizacji działań dyplomatycznych. Profesjonalny charakter dyplomacji to znak docenienia relacji z otoczeniem, sygnał gotowości do rozmowy, otwartości i zrozumienia sieciowej natury świata ludzkiego. Zaniedbywanie dyplomacji, czy też wręcz wykorzystywanie dyplomacji do wzmagania konfliktu, było i jest smutną oznaką zamykania się społeczeństw i ich elit, izolowania od uniwersum ludzkiej cywilizacji i kultury. Ramówka: - Rozgrzewka:)) - Nowinki / starowinki - 5:10 - Lektury - 22:19 - Temat przewodni - 41:57 Pełny tekst opisu zamieściliśmy na stronie internetowej naszego projektu: http://2historykow1mikrofon.pl/otwarta-dyplomacja/ Wymienione w czasie audycji publikacje i materiały: - Joseph Garncarz, Korrektur eines Selbstbildes. Norbert Elias uns ein akademischer Lebenslauf, Magdeburg 2021, https://www.halem-verlag.de/produkt/korrektur-eines-selbstbildes/ (ostatni dostęp: 26.10.2022) - Krzysztof Fokt, Organizacja grodowa w drugiej monarchii piastowskiej. Studium krytyczne, Kraków: Societas Vistulana, 2022. https://vistulana.pl/produkt/organizacja-grodowa-w-drugiej-monarchii-piastowskiej-studium-krytyczne/ (ostatni dostęp: 26.10.2022) #2historyków1mikrofon Krzysztof Ruchniewicz Blog: www.krzysztofruchniewicz.eu Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/krzysztof.ruchniewicz.3 Instagram: www.instagram.com/ruchpho/ Twitter: twitter.com/krzyruch YouTube: www.youtube.com/channel/UCT23Rwyk…iew_as=subscriber Przemysław Wiszewski Blog: www.przemysławwiszewski.pl Facebook: www.facebook.com/przemyslaw.wiszewski Instagram: www.instagram.com/przewisz/ Twitter: twitter.com/wiszewski YuoTube: www.youtube.com/channel/UCuq6q08E…iew_as=subscriber Do nagrania intro i outro wykorzystaliśmy utwór RogerThat'a pt. „Retro 70s Metal” (licencja nr JAM-WEB-2020-0010041).

Als Joost vroeger -dat was nog voor ie Maureen trouwde- een date had, dan legde hij de date drie opties voor. Een daarvan was een rondleiding bij de gehaktballenfabriek in Vianen. Nooit heeft een vrouw voor die optie gekozen. Dat wilde Hans wel eens meemaken, zo'n rondleiding. Op naar Vianen, Joost met zijn auto, Hans met de Audi A2. Dat was omdat we na afloop ieder een andere kant op moesten. Waar spreek je dan af? Hotel Van de Valk Vianen natuurlijk, makkelijk te vinden, aan de snelweg, kan Joost daar bij Hans instappen, microfoons opspelden, aanzetten en naar de gehaktballenfabriek.  -GPS 51.98981, 5.08392 -Kickstart Tom Bombadil Finale -Atom and Archetype: The Pauli / Jung Letters, 1932-1958 -Filmpje Kort Verband Vrijwilliger NIMH -Norbert Elias, Het civilisatieproces, Boom 2021 -Spencer Davis Group, I am a Man     -Which woman hasn't been bombarded by unsolicited help from men?  

The keyword in the title of this often overlooked essay in Écrits is “subject.” No surprise there! But notice how Lacan presents the subject at essay's end:Why and how the subject functions “a joint” — and not just any joint, but a joint between “the consequences of language and the desire for knowledge” — are the primary questions in part two of our podcast "On the Subject Who is Finally in Question."Along the way, we define subjects as symptoms as signifiers apart from signs and representational logics, with identity formations in the digital age as touchstones throughout. Lo! the networked self of late-modernity! Which is not the same, of course, as somebody sitting on a toilet. More like a dictionary shot through with desire. Or so this episode suggests. You'll also hear one-line definitions of objet a, castration, holding environments, and the sinthome, along with shoutouts to Heidegger and Norbert Elias, a two-minute crash course on consumer logics of desire, another round of truths detoured in knowledge, and a final word on those bloody velvet shirts stuck to our skin.Stay tuned for two more episodes next week. “Variations on the Standard Treatment,” here we come!And I look forward to seeing y'all live and in-person (at least via Zoom) on Wednesday, the 28th, for our opening session on THE DRIVE! Link below for all the key details. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit lecturesonlacan.substack.com

Morre em Amsterdã em 1º de agosto de 1990, o sociólogo Norbert Elias aos 93 anos. De família judaica, ele teve de fugir da Alemanha nazista e se exilou em 1933 na França, antes de se estabelecer na Inglaterra, onde passaria grande parte de sua carreira.Veja a matéria completa em: https://operamundi.uol.com.br/historia/30356/hoje-na-historia-1990-morre-o-sociologo-alemao-norbert-elias-aos-93-anos----Quer contribuir com Opera Mundi via PIX? Nossa chave é apoie@operamundi.com.br (Razão Social: Última Instancia Editorial Ltda.). Desde já agradecemos!Assinatura solidária: www.operamundi.com.br/apoio★ Support this podcast ★

Hechos con Palabras - Norbert Elias by Radiotelevisión de Veracruz

Nesse episódio os três odiados problematizam a ideia já consagrada de "jeitinho brasileiro". Para tanto, utilizam autores já clássicos nesse debate, como Gilberto Freyre e Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, mas também trazem contribuições mais contemporâneas, como a de Chico de Oliveira. Passeando pela ideia de construção de caráter nacional, a partir de Norbert Elias, eles buscam traçar os elementos para a compreensão daquilo que faz do Brasil aquilo que ele é. Bateu a curiosidade? Aperte o play e acompanhe esse papo que é tudo, menos óbvio.

Vox's Jamil Smith talks with journalist and author Eyal Press about "dirty work" — the jobs Americans do that, as Press explains, can lead workers to perform morally compromising activities unwittingly. They discuss examples of this kind of work (drone pilots, meat packers, prison aides), talk about its relation to the term "essential workers" that gained prominence during the pandemic, and explain how certain jobs highlight the disparities of class, race, and gender in American society. Host: Jamil Smith (@JamilSmith), Senior Correspondent, Vox Guest: Eyal Press (@EyalPress), author; journalist References:  Dirty Work: Essential Jobs and the Hidden Toll of Inequality in America by Eyal Press (FSG; 2021) "What does it mean to take America's 'jobs of last resort'?" by Jamil Smith (Vox; Apr. 22) Empire of Pain: The Secret History of the Sackler Dynasty by Patrick Radden Keefe (Doubleday; 2021) The Social Network, dir. David Fincher (2010) The Jungle by Upton Sinclair (1906) The Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison (1952) The Civilizing Process by Norbert Elias (1939) "Good People and Dirty Work" by Everett C. Hughes (Social Problems, vol. 10 (1); 1962) The Line Becomes a River by Francisco Cantú (Riverhead; 2019) "Inside the Massive Jail that Doubles as Chicago's Largest Mental Health Facility" by Lili Holzer-Glier (Vera Institute of Justice; 2016) Enjoyed this episode? Rate Vox Conversations ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Subscribe for free. Be the first to hear the next episode of Vox Conversations by subscribing in your favorite podcast app. Support Vox Conversations by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Erikk Geannikis Editor: Amy Drozdowska Engineer: Patrick Boyd Deputy Editorial Director, Vox Talk: Amber Hall Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Philip Dwyer is Professor in the School of Humanities and Social Science at the University of Newcastle, Australia. He has published widely on the Revolutionary and Napoleonic eras, including a three-volume biography of Napoleon. He is the general editor of a four volume Cambridge World History of Violence, and co-editor of the Cambridge History of the Napoleonic Wars. He is the editor of The Darker Angels of Our Nature: Refuting the Pinker Theory of History & Violence. In this episode, we focus on The Darker Angels of Our Nature. We present Steven Pinker's argument about trends in violence across history. We then define “violence”, and talk about the limitations of historical sources of data. We talk about forms of violence that apparently have been on the rise recently. We discuss how to deal with death tolls in war. We talk about the historical and cultural context of violence, Norbert Elias' “civilizing process”, and the Enlightenment. Finally, we talk about factors identified by historians that play a role in violence trends, and ask if it is possible to objectively say that there has been moral progress. -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: KARIN LIETZCKE, ANN BLANCHETTE, PER HELGE LARSEN, LAU GUERREIRO, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, HERBERT GINTIS, RUTGER VOS, RICARDO VLADIMIRO, CRAIG HEALY, OLAF ALEX, PHILIP KURIAN, JONATHAN VISSER, JAKOB KLINKBY, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, PAULINA BARREN, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ARTHUR KOH, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, SUSAN PINKER, PABLO SANTURBANO, SIMON COLUMBUS, PHIL KAVANAGH, JORGE ESPINHA, CORY CLARK, MARK BLYTH, ROBERTO INGUANZO, MIKKEL STORMYR, ERIC NEURMANN, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, BERNARD HUGUENEY, ALEXANDER DANNBAUER, FERGAL CUSSEN, YEVHEN BODRENKO, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, DON ROSS, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, OZLEM BULUT, NATHAN NGUYEN, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, J.W., JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, IDAN SOLON, ROMAIN ROCH, DMITRY GRIGORYEV, TOM ROTH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, AL ORTIZ, NELLEKE BAK, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, NICK GOLDEN, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS P. FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, DENISE COOK, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, AND TRADERINNYC! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, IAN GILLIGAN, LUIS CAYETANO, TOM VANEGDOM, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, VEGA GIDEY, THOMAS TRUMBLE, AND NUNO ELDER! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MICHAL RUSIECKI, ROSEY, JAMES PRATT, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, AND BOGDAN KANIVETS!

durée : 00:37:51 - Le Temps du débat - par : Emmanuel Laurentin - De nombreux partis ont motivé leurs consignes de vote par la nécessité de faire "barrage" au RN, du fait de la présence de l'extrême-droite au second tour. Quel poids peuvent avoir ces consignes dans les résultats ? La notion de “front républicain” a-t-elle toujours un sens aujourd'hui ? - invités : Marion Fontaine Historienne, maître de conférences à l'université d'Avignon, co-directrice du centre Norbert Elias; Dominique Reynié Politologue. Professeur des Universités à Sciences Po.

This week's episode of The Encrypted Economy, our guests are Jennifer Cobbe from the University of Manchester and Dr. Heleen Janssen from the University of Amsterdam. We discuss what effective legal frameworks would look like in the face of rapidly changing technologies and changing interdependencies among people. Be sure to subscribe to The Encrypted Economy for more coverage of the innovations in blockchain and legal questions that arise from them.Topics Covered:·       Introduction·       Jennifer and Heleen's Background·       Introducing the Concept of Figuration ·       How do we Consider Figuration Analysis in a Digital Age?·       Role of Balances of Power in Figuration Analysis·       Challenges With Implementing Figuration Analysis ·       How Does Current Regulation Fail to Contemplate Figuration? ·       Discussing Personal Data Storage·       Discussing Jennifer and Heleen's Paper on Data Protection ·       How do we Ensure Collective Interests are Represented?·       Closing Thoughts on the Philosophy of Law Resource List:·       Heleen's Professor Profile·       Jennifer's Website·       Personal data ordering in context: the interaction of meso-level data governance regimes with macro frameworks·       Personal information management systems: a user-centric privacy utopia?·       The concept of figuration or configuration in Norbert Elias' sociological theory·       GDPR·       TEE – Thomas Dittmar, founder of Polypoly ·       Data protection and tech startups: The need for attention, support, andscrutiny         Follow The Encrypted Economy on your favorite platforms! Twitter LinkedIn Instagram Facebook      

Episode 24 : L'attente, une activité ordinaire, sociale et politique L'article original : Ruth Ayaß, "Doing Waiting: An Ethnomethodological Analysis", Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 49(4), 2020, p. 419‑455. --------- Les références citées dans l'article et mobilisées implicitement ou explicitement dans le podcast : Norbert Elias, La Société de cour, Paris, Flammarion, 2008 [1969]. Kimmo Svinhufvud, "Waiting for the customer: Multimodal analysis of waiting in service encounters", Journal of Pragmatics, 129, 2018. Adresse : https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/waiting-for-the-customer-multimodal-analysis-of-waiting-in-servic. --------- Autres références (non citées) : Harold Garfinkel, "Le programme de l'ethnométhodologie" dans L'ethnométhodologie : une sociologie radicale, La Découverte, 2001. Adresse : https://www.cairn.info/l‑ethnomethodologie–9782707133731-page-31.htm Micéala Symington et Jean Bessière, "Littérature et mémoire des territoires de l'attente" dans Alain Musset et Laurent Vidal (éd.) , Les territoires de l'attente : Migrations et mobilités dans les Amériques (XIXe-XXIe siècle), Des Amériques, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2017. Adresse : http://books.openedition.org/pur/41903 Une série de 4 belles émissions sur l'attente sur France Culture : https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/les-chemins-de-la-philosophie/lattente-14-vladimir-jankelevitch-le-meilleur-est-a-venir Pour la référence à Emily Dickinson : Emily Dickinson, Poésies complètes, édition bilingue. Nouvelle édition revue et corrigée par Françoise Delphy, Flammarion, 2020.

The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR.  Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR.  Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/japanese-studies

The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR.  Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Neste episódio do Historicidade, o programa de entrevistas do Fronteiras no Tempo, conversamos com o Professor Doutor Deivy Ferreira Carneiro (UFU), sobre as ofensas verbais e os conflitos na História. O ato de ofender alguém com palavras ou xingamentos sempre esteve presente na atuação da justiça criminal, e hoje, por meio dos documentos produzidos na repressão a esses crimes, podemos entender o que significava esta ação, os conflitos que desencadeava e, ainda, vários outros aspectos da história cotidiana das sociedades passadas. Nesta entrevista: Entenda como o historiador trabalha com as fontes da justiça criminal e quais são os caminhos para compreender os conflitos e ofensas verbais naqueles documentos. Conheça os tipos de xingamentos estudados e porque alguns ofendiam mais do que outros. Surpreenda-se com a relevância que um ataque verbal poderia ter no início e/ou no desenrolar de um conflito e, ainda, saiba por que se fazia questão de que fossem punidos os que cometiam este delito. Por fim, reflita conosco sobre o papel da justiça criminal no contexto social e político brasileiro do século XIX e XX e em como a atuação dos seus agentes, em interação com a sociedade, ajudaram a conformar formas de comportamentos e valores. Arte da Capa Publicidade Ajude nosso projeto! Você pode nos apoiar de duas formas: PADRIM  – só clicar e se cadastrar (bem rápido e prático) PIC PAY – Baixe o aplicativo do PicPay: iOS / Android Saiba mais do nosso convidado Deivy Ferreira Carneiro Currículo Lattes Produção do convidado CARNEIRO, Deivy F. A Microstoria italiana e os desafios biográficos na historiografia recente (1980-2000). Locus: Revista de História, v. 26, p. 211-234, 2020. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Norbert Elias e a história da violência no Brasil. ArtCultura_Revista de História, Cultura e Arte Uberlândia, v. 19, p. 189-206, 2017. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Micro-história e uma análise da relação entre a população e a justiça criminal. In: Maíra Vendrame e Alexandre Karsburg. (Org.). Micro-história: um método em transformação. 1ed.São Paulo: Letra e Voz, 2020, v. 1, p. 309-336. CARNEIRO, Deivy F. Microanalise e o Leviata: uma homenagem a Antonio Manuel Hespanha.. In: Diego Nunes; Gustavo Ferreira Santos; Jonatan de Jesus Oliveira. (Org.). Linhas Juridicas do Triangulo: estudos em homenagem ao Professor Antonio Manuel Hespanha.. 1ed.Uberlândia: LAECC, 2020, v. 1, p. 37-57. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Bares, jogatinas e cultura popular na Zona da Mata mineira (1854-19410. In: Cleber Dias; Maria Cristina Rosa. (Org.). História do Lazer nas Gerais. 1ed.Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG, 2019, v. 1, p. 113-136. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Micro-História, História do Crime e da justiça Criminal: um diálogo possível e desejado. In: Maíra I. Vendrame; Cláudia Mauch; Paulo Roberto S. Moreira. (Org.). Crime e Justiça: reflexões, fontes e possibilidades de pesquisa. 1ed.São Leopoldo: Editora da Unisinos, 2018, p. 33-66. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Os usos da biografia pela micro-história italiana: interdependência, biografias coletivas e network analysis. In: Alexandre de Sá Avelar; Benito Bisso Schmidt. (Org.). O que pode a Biografia. 1ed.São Paulo: Letra e Voz, 2018, v. 1, p. 33-58. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Apontamentos para uma História Eliasiana da violência no Brasil. In: Célia Nonata Silva; Francisco Linhares Fonteles Neto. (Org.). Discere criminum: crime, violência e poder – uma abordagem nacional. 1ed. Maceió: Imprensa Oficial Graciliano Ramos, 2017, v. , p. 111-144. CARNEIRO, Deivy F. Uma Justiça que seduz? Ofensas verbais e conflitos comunitários em Minas Gerais (1854-1941). 1. ed. Jundiaí: Paco Editorial, 2019. v. 1. 368p . CARNEIRO, Deivy F.; Bretas, Marcos Luiz ; Rosemberg, André . História, violência e criminalidade: reflexões temáticas e narrativas regionais. 1. ed. Uberlândia: Edufu, 2015. v. 1. 332p Indicações bibliográficas sobre o tema abordado GARRIOCH, David. Insultos verbais na Paris do século XVIII. In: BURKE, Peter & PORTER, Roy. História social da linguagem. São Paulo: Edunesp, 1997, p. 121. FLYNN, Charles. Insult and society: patterns of comparative interaction. Port Washington / New York: Kennikat Press. 1977, p. 3-6.   LEACH, Edmund. “Aspectos antropológicos da linguagem: categorias animais e insulto verbal”. In: DA MATTA, Roberto (org). Edmund Leach. Coleção grandes cientistas sociais. São Paulo: Ática, 1983, p. 170-98. BURKE, Peter. “L'art de l'insulte en Italie aux XVie et XVIIe siècles”. In: DELUMEAU, Jean. Injuries et Blasphemes. Mentalites: Histoire dês cultures et dês sociétés. Vol. 2. Éditions Imago, 1989 PITT-RIVERS, Julian. “Honra e posição social”. In: PERISTIANY, J. G. Honra e Vergonha: valores das sociedades mediterrânicas. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, s/d. WADDAMS, S. M. Sexual Slander in 19th century England: defamation in the ecclesiastical courts. 1815-1855. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000. SHOEMAKER, Robert. “The Decline of Public Insult in London 1660-1800”. Past & Present, n.169, November, 2000, p. 97-131. Expediente  Arte da vitrine: Augusto Carvalho; Edição:  Talk'nCast; Roteiro e apresentação:  Beraba. Como citar esse episódio Citação ABNT Fronteiras no Tempo: Historicidade #34 Ofensas verbais e conflitos na história. Locução Marcelo de Souza Silva, Deivy Ferreira Carneiro. [S.l.] Portal Deviante, 20/10/2020. Podcast. Disponível: http://www.deviante.com.br/?p=41201&preview=true Redes Sociais Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Instagram, SPOTIFY,  Contato E-mail: fronteirasnotempo@gmail.com Madrinhas e Padrinhos Alexandre Strapação Guedes Vianna, Alexsandro de Souza Junior, Aline Lima, Anderson O Garcia, Anderson Paz, André Luis Santos, Andre Trapani Costa Possignolo, Andréa Silva, Andressa Marcelino Cardoso, Artur Henrique de Andrade Cornejo, Bruno Scomparin, Carlos Alberto de Souza Palmezani, Carlos Alberto Jr., Carolina Pereira Lyon, Ceará, Cláudia Bovo, Eani Marculino de Moura, Eduardo Saavedra Losada Lopes, Elisnei Oliveira, Ettore Riter, Felipe Augusto Roza, Felipe Sousa Santana, Flavio Henrique Dias Saldanha, Iago Mardones, Iara Grisi, Isaura Helena, João Carlos Ariedi Filho, José Carlos dos Santos, Leticia Duarte Hartmann, Lucas Akel, Luciano Beraba, Manuel Macias, Marcos Sorrilha, Mayara Araujo dos Reis, Mayara Sanches, Moises Antiqueira, Paulo Henrique de Nunzio, Rafael, Rafael Alves de Oliveira, Rafael Igino Serafim, Rafael Machado Saldanha, Rafael Zipão, Raphael Almeida, Raphael Bruno Silva Oliveira, Renata Sanches, Rodrigo Raupp, Rodrigo Vieira Pimentel, Rubens Lima, Sr. Pinto, Wagner de Andrade Alves, Willian Scaquett, Willian Spengler e ao padrinho anônimoSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Acá algunos fragmentos Sobre el tiempo de Norbert Elias. El tiempo no es natural ni meramente físico: es lo que pasa entre dos acontecimientos que el ser humano identifica como significativos. La vivencia del tiempo nunca es pura, siempre es social, siempre coordina, siempre integra. El tiempo es una fuerza coactiva que el grupo impone al individuo. El tiempo nos condiciona para que podamos vivir en sociedad: crea y fija rutinas, horarios, rituales, ciclos que en nuestra existencia serán como normales dentro de marcos de referencia diferenciados, es decir, útiles, orientados a cumplir una acción social. Se vuelve más estricto el mando de los relojes cuanto más dependemos de lxs otrxs. La aceleración no significa ir más rápido en esencia. Vamos más rápido porque estamos más ocupadxs, porque nos cruzan más secuencias, porque estas forman parte de la reproducción diaria y a largo plazo de la vida individual y de la humanidad. En otras palabras, estar aceleradx es ser más productivo, tener menos tiempo para “unx mismx”. Por eso parece que el tiempo no nos pertenece: se lo debemos (casi) todo a la sociedad. La sociedad es un cristal de pautas de tiempo. Y estas son todo menos eternas, Galileo. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/anarkademia/message

The work of sociologist Norbert Elias has had a renaissance in recent times, with Steven Pinker, among others, using it to argue that interpersonal violence has declined globally as states have expanded and subdued restless populations. In Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia (Cambridge University Press, 2015), Roderic Broadhurst and his co-authors Thierry and Brigette Bouhours bring the declinist thesis to Southeast Asia. Coupling Elias's approach with criminological theory, Broadhurst and the Bouhours argue that Cambodia's experience over a 150 years is broadly consistent with what Elias found in Europe: that by monopolising force, generating chains of interdependence, and sensitising people to violence, states have an overall civilising effect. This is a startling and counterintuitive finding for a country whose name was not so long ago synonymous with genocide. But, Broadhurst and co-authors explain, the civilizing process is not linear. Asia like Europe has had its decivilising periods, and it might yet have some more. The overall trend, nevertheless, is away from violence and towards civility. Roderic Broadhurst joins New Books in Southeast Asian Studies to talk about state violence versus interpersonal violence, French colonial administration, postcolonialism and modernity, Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge, Hun Sen and authoritarianism, and the challenges of doing historical sociology across multiple regime types and periods. You may also be interested in: Astrid Noren-Nilsson, Cambodia's Second Kingdom: Nation, Imagination, and Democracy Abram de Swaan, The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder Nick Cheesman is a fellow at the College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University. He can be reached at nick.cheesman@anu.edu.au.

这是《得意忘形》播客的第 16 期节目。这期节目从英国莱斯特大学飞来了一名热心听众，与我探讨了一些关于社会学的话题，以及他的精神导师 Norbert Elias。并且涉及了一点点关于，为什么社会学也是心理学也是生物学也是哲学的内容。本期节目里你可以听到：* 社会学是什么？* 社会学界的「哥白尼」Norbert Elias（埃利亚斯）的文明化理论是什么？* Norbert Elias与英国莱斯特大学社会学系有什么故事？* 个体是如何受到自身所处的社会的影响的？* 人与人之间的优越感是如何产生的？* 为什么社会是一个动态的，非理性的，未经计划的过程？本期延伸阅读：（链接版：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/26803968/）* 学术散文：《故事里的社会学》* 《文明的进程》* 《个体的社会》* 《The Established and the Outsiders》* 德国社会学家 Jürgen Habermas（哈贝马斯）：以沟通行动理论著名，提倡以理性沟通的方式获得个人的解放本期嘉宾：* 喻恺东：英国莱斯特社会学在读硕士研究生。着迷于 Norbert Elias 的社会学理论，乐于传播他的思想。个人微信公众号：听说东语音乐：* 静默蹉跎 by 何天程（喻恺东好友）播客简介：《得意忘形》是一个主张追求个体自由与探寻真理的媒体计划。我们见证了第一次工业gm以来科技对人类社会的极大推动与助益，但也意识到资本主义与市场经济不可避免地催生了消费文化、剥夺了个人价值、并窃取了大众时间。带着对生命的有限性与无目的性的敬畏，我们试图为读者与听众提供更全面的觉察自我与认知世界的工具，以不断重建当下的方式穿越时间、抵达生活的本质。