POPULARITY
Avec Gilberto Villaroel, Floriane Soulas et Patrick K. Dewdney.Animation : Anne Canoville et Benjamin Bolchegeek Dans l'utopie écologiste d'Ecotopia d'Ernest Callenbach, écrite dans les années 70, la société très pacifique s'adonne paradoxalement à des jeux de guerre extrêmement violents, comme pour expurger du collectif les pulsions de compétition et de domination par l'entremise d'une pratique rituelle. Cet exemple parmi d'autres (comme “The lottery” de Shirley Jackson) a de quoi choquer, à l'instar du journaliste William Weston assistant à ces jeux pour la première fois dans le roman de Callenbach. Si, comme l'exposent les sociologues Norbert Elias et Eric Dunning dans Sport et civilisation : la violence maîtrisée (1994), la compétition sportive a pu être une manière de canaliser la violence des sociétés en la rejouant dans la compétition sportive selon un cadre policé, comment comprendre celle qui éclate dans les oeuvres de science-fiction mettant en scène des sports brutaux ou même des jeux de la mort ? Pourquoi la SF privilégie-t-elle l'exposition de jeux systématiquement violents ? Spectateur·ices et lecteur·ices de ces œuvres, nous ne sommes pas directement confronté·es à la violence des jeux, mais bien à des représentations de celle-ci : alors, que nous disent-elles ? S'enracinent-elles dans une conception particulièrement brutale du sport, nombre de ces productions étant originaires des Etats-Unis ? Dans l'expression d'une violence sociale réelle, refoulée derrière les écrans et les vitrines que sont les Coupes du Monde et les Jeux Olympiques ? Dans les symptômes d'une société qui conçoit les rapports humains comme une compétition féroce entre les individus, proche du darwinisme social ? Au centre de nos questionnements sur la thématique « Du Pain et des jeux », cette table-ronde clôturera le cycle programmé par l'équipe du festival. Table ronde dans le cadre de la 12e édition du festival Les Intergalactiques "Du Pain et des Jeux" le samedi 20 avril 2024.
Weinig denkers hebben zo'n grote invloed gehad op het denken over de samenleving als Norbert Elias. Wat is vandaag de dag, vijfendertig jaar na zijn dood, de intellectuele betekenis van de grondlegger van de civilisatietheorie? Dit bespreken we samen met Christien Brinkgreve, Abram de Swaan, Tahrim Ramdjan en Arjan Post.Snot, speeksel, toiletgewoontes en tafelmanieren, ze vormden het onderzoeksterrein van Norbert Elias. Door in te zoomen op hoe alledaagse, banale rituelen en omgangsvormen door de eeuwen steeds strikter werden, wierp Elias een nieuwe blik op de eeuwenlange ontwikkeling van de beschaving, vooral in Europa. Hij zag daarin een nauwe samenhang tussen processen van statenvorming en veranderingen in menselijke beleving en gedrag.In zijn magnus opus Het civilisatieproces beargumenteert Elias hoe we steeds gevoeliger werden voor vuil, naaktheid en geweld. Elias analyseerde hoe men zich vanaf de middeleeuwen begon te reguleren en te spiegelen aan de gedragsnormen van de hofelite. Zo koppelde Elias het intieme en persoonlijke aan een omvattende politieke en maatschappelijke meta-analyse. Daarmee werd Elias een van de invloedrijkste sociologen van de twintigste eeuw. Met name in Nederland, waar Elias zijn laatste jaren doorbracht, verwierf zijn denken veel aanhang. We bespreken welke zeggingskracht Elias' werk vandaag de dag heeft. Kan het denken van Elias helpen om populistische tendensen in de westerse wereld te duiden? En hoe problematisch is zijn eurocentrische blik op de beschaving? Zijn we echt gevoeliger geworden voor geweld, zoals Elias betoogde, of is geweld juist inherent onderdeel van de westerse moderniteit?Norbert Elias werd 1897 in het Duitse Breslau (tegenwoordig Wrocław, Polen) geboren. In 1933 vluchtte de Joodse Elias eerst naar Frankrijk en later het Verenigd Koninkrijk. In 1939 publiceerde hij zijn bekendste en meest invloedrijke werk Over het civilisatieproces. De laatste jaren van zijn leven bracht hij in Amsterdam door. Elias is van grote invloed geweest op Nederlandse sociologen als Joop Goudsblom en Abram de Swaan. Elias overleed in 1990.Publieke Intellectuelen wordt mede mogelijk gemaakt door VfondsZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
“I just make the time to read a book and it gives me this burst of fire in the belly to give me another two or three hours of creativity or productivity.” This cry of passion by author Robin Sharma is a call to arms four HEC researchers have heard throughout their respective careers. Gilles Deleuze, Norbert Elias, Sherry Turkle and E.O. Wilson are so many references inspiring our academics in their devotion to further their disciplines. They share their passion for books in this first Breakthroughs podcast of 2025. Find the written highlights in Knowledge@HEC here. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Partiendo de una realidad política que es, al mismo tiempo, artística y cultural, el libro Ars Hasburgica revisa el concepto historiográfico del Renacimiento. Hasta hace unos años, este periodo se entendía desde una perspectiva geográficamente italocéntrica, muy próxima al lenguaje clásico y políticamente centrada en la idea de las "artes nacionales" y las "escuelas regionales". Sin embargo, los últimos estudios certifican que el Renacimiento es un fenómeno global y complejo. Esta publicación ofrece una visión del arte que estudia el papel desempeñado por la dinastía de los Habsburgo y sus diversas cortes, intentando verificar si, al aplicar otros modelos historiográficos y al tener como enfoque el arte de la Casa de Austria, las ideas tradicionales pueden defenderse ante la comprensión del pasado en el siglo XXI. Los editores mencionan el llamado "paradigma de Vasari" que, en gran medida, es el fundamento para la historia del arte del siglo XVI escrita a lo largo de los últimos siglos. La publicación también busca definiciones de los fenómenos artísticos, no tanto en torno a naciones e identidades de las artes, sino planteando estos temas a través de ideas relacionadas con la Corte como esfera política, artística y cultural, partiendo de los estudios de Norbert Elias, Amedeo Quondam o Carlo Ossola. Miguel Ángel Zalama es Catedrático y director del Departamento de Historia del Arte en la Universidad de Valladolid (España), así como director del Centro Tordesillas para las Relaciones con América Latina. Tras concluir la tesis doctoral. realizó estancias tanto en el Institute of Fine Arts de la Universidad de Nueva York, donde trabajó con Jonathan Brown, así como en la Universidad de La Sapienza en Roma, en la Université Catholique de l'Ouest, Angers (Francia), y en la Universidad de Monterrey (México). Fernando Checa, es Catedrático de Historia del Arte en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Ha sido Director del Museo Nacional del Prado (1996-2001), y Premio Nacional de Historia de España (1993). Ha comisariado exposiciones sobre la Casa de Austria en Madrid, Viena, París, Gante, Bruselas, Toledo o Puebla de los Ángeles (México). También ha sido Senior Fellow Paul Mellon en CASVA (Washington) y Profesor Visitante en la Université de Genève (Suiza) y en la Universidad Estatal de Oklahoma. CINTER (Corte, Imagen, Nobleza y Territorio) es un grupo de investigación de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (https://www.proyectocinter.com/). La entrevista sobre la publicación Ars Habsburgica se realiza con Miguel Ángel Zalama, editor de la publicación, y Jesús Pascual Molina, autor de uno de los capítulos de la misma. Presenta Oskar J. Rojewski, profesor de Historia del Arte con especialización en el Arte Flamenco de la Baja Edad Media y el Renacimiento. Se le puede encontrar en X.com como @oscarro90 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Partiendo de una realidad política que es, al mismo tiempo, artística y cultural, el libro Ars Hasburgica revisa el concepto historiográfico del Renacimiento. Hasta hace unos años, este periodo se entendía desde una perspectiva geográficamente italocéntrica, muy próxima al lenguaje clásico y políticamente centrada en la idea de las "artes nacionales" y las "escuelas regionales". Sin embargo, los últimos estudios certifican que el Renacimiento es un fenómeno global y complejo. Esta publicación ofrece una visión del arte que estudia el papel desempeñado por la dinastía de los Habsburgo y sus diversas cortes, intentando verificar si, al aplicar otros modelos historiográficos y al tener como enfoque el arte de la Casa de Austria, las ideas tradicionales pueden defenderse ante la comprensión del pasado en el siglo XXI. Los editores mencionan el llamado "paradigma de Vasari" que, en gran medida, es el fundamento para la historia del arte del siglo XVI escrita a lo largo de los últimos siglos. La publicación también busca definiciones de los fenómenos artísticos, no tanto en torno a naciones e identidades de las artes, sino planteando estos temas a través de ideas relacionadas con la Corte como esfera política, artística y cultural, partiendo de los estudios de Norbert Elias, Amedeo Quondam o Carlo Ossola. Miguel Ángel Zalama es Catedrático y director del Departamento de Historia del Arte en la Universidad de Valladolid (España), así como director del Centro Tordesillas para las Relaciones con América Latina. Tras concluir la tesis doctoral. realizó estancias tanto en el Institute of Fine Arts de la Universidad de Nueva York, donde trabajó con Jonathan Brown, así como en la Universidad de La Sapienza en Roma, en la Université Catholique de l'Ouest, Angers (Francia), y en la Universidad de Monterrey (México). Fernando Checa, es Catedrático de Historia del Arte en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Ha sido Director del Museo Nacional del Prado (1996-2001), y Premio Nacional de Historia de España (1993). Ha comisariado exposiciones sobre la Casa de Austria en Madrid, Viena, París, Gante, Bruselas, Toledo o Puebla de los Ángeles (México). También ha sido Senior Fellow Paul Mellon en CASVA (Washington) y Profesor Visitante en la Université de Genève (Suiza) y en la Universidad Estatal de Oklahoma. CINTER (Corte, Imagen, Nobleza y Territorio) es un grupo de investigación de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (https://www.proyectocinter.com/). La entrevista sobre la publicación Ars Habsburgica se realiza con Miguel Ángel Zalama, editor de la publicación, y Jesús Pascual Molina, autor de uno de los capítulos de la misma. Presenta Oskar J. Rojewski, profesor de Historia del Arte con especialización en el Arte Flamenco de la Baja Edad Media y el Renacimiento. Se le puede encontrar en X.com como @oscarro90 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Partiendo de una realidad política que es, al mismo tiempo, artística y cultural, el libro Ars Hasburgica revisa el concepto historiográfico del Renacimiento. Hasta hace unos años, este periodo se entendía desde una perspectiva geográficamente italocéntrica, muy próxima al lenguaje clásico y políticamente centrada en la idea de las "artes nacionales" y las "escuelas regionales". Sin embargo, los últimos estudios certifican que el Renacimiento es un fenómeno global y complejo. Esta publicación ofrece una visión del arte que estudia el papel desempeñado por la dinastía de los Habsburgo y sus diversas cortes, intentando verificar si, al aplicar otros modelos historiográficos y al tener como enfoque el arte de la Casa de Austria, las ideas tradicionales pueden defenderse ante la comprensión del pasado en el siglo XXI. Los editores mencionan el llamado "paradigma de Vasari" que, en gran medida, es el fundamento para la historia del arte del siglo XVI escrita a lo largo de los últimos siglos. La publicación también busca definiciones de los fenómenos artísticos, no tanto en torno a naciones e identidades de las artes, sino planteando estos temas a través de ideas relacionadas con la Corte como esfera política, artística y cultural, partiendo de los estudios de Norbert Elias, Amedeo Quondam o Carlo Ossola. Miguel Ángel Zalama es Catedrático y director del Departamento de Historia del Arte en la Universidad de Valladolid (España), así como director del Centro Tordesillas para las Relaciones con América Latina. Tras concluir la tesis doctoral. realizó estancias tanto en el Institute of Fine Arts de la Universidad de Nueva York, donde trabajó con Jonathan Brown, así como en la Universidad de La Sapienza en Roma, en la Université Catholique de l'Ouest, Angers (Francia), y en la Universidad de Monterrey (México). Fernando Checa, es Catedrático de Historia del Arte en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Ha sido Director del Museo Nacional del Prado (1996-2001), y Premio Nacional de Historia de España (1993). Ha comisariado exposiciones sobre la Casa de Austria en Madrid, Viena, París, Gante, Bruselas, Toledo o Puebla de los Ángeles (México). También ha sido Senior Fellow Paul Mellon en CASVA (Washington) y Profesor Visitante en la Université de Genève (Suiza) y en la Universidad Estatal de Oklahoma. CINTER (Corte, Imagen, Nobleza y Territorio) es un grupo de investigación de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (https://www.proyectocinter.com/). La entrevista sobre la publicación Ars Habsburgica se realiza con Miguel Ángel Zalama, editor de la publicación, y Jesús Pascual Molina, autor de uno de los capítulos de la misma. Presenta Oskar J. Rojewski, profesor de Historia del Arte con especialización en el Arte Flamenco de la Baja Edad Media y el Renacimiento. Se le puede encontrar en X.com como @oscarro90 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
La muerte juega un papel axial en nuestras vidas. El ser humano muere un poco cada instante en el que las manecillas del reloj avanzan. El ejercicio de pensar la muerte involucra el ejercicio de pensar y, claro, de pensar la vida. Pensar la muerte, pensarse uno en su propia mortalidad, es un ejercicio sumamente revelador, que ensancha nuestra existencia y la torna más plena y auténtica. Apoyándose e inspirándose en grandes personalidades como Arthur Schopenhauer, Byung-Chul Han, Edgar Morin, Elias Canetti, Emmanuel Lévinas, Fernando Pessoa, Julián Marías, Martin Heidegger, Norbert Elias, Philippe Ariès, Séneca, Sigmund Freud y un largo etcétera, el autor cavila sobre la muerte y sus múltiples caras. El resultado es una obra singular, que trasciende cualquier tipo de morbo y resulta extremadamente provechosa y esclarecedora para cualquiera de nosotros. «Uno tiene la sensación de que todo el mundo debería alguna vez leer este libro». ALEJANDRO ROJAS AUTOR Alejandro G. J. Peña (Málaga, 1993) es escritor y profesor de la Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (España), donde imparte clases en el grado de Psicología de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad de Sevilla. Actualmente, realiza su segunda tesis doctoral en Comunicación por las Universidades de Málaga, Sevilla, Cádiz y Huelva. Cursó los másteres en Filosofía, Ciencia y Ciudadanía y en Ciencias Cognitivas. Sus líneas de investigación discurren en las áreas de la tanatología y de la antropología y filosofía de la muerte; leitmotiv, además, de su obra más personal enmarcada en la literatura y la poesía. Subdirector de la revista de filosofía Claridades y autor de múltiples artículos de investigación y libros, entre los que ha ejercido de editor y coordinador. Revista digital La tortuga Avui. www.latortugaavui.com Redes: Instagram: area-hermetica-radio. Facebook grupo Secrets del Pirineu Telegram: [https://t.me/.../FSW-COI...//t.me/joinchat/FSW-COI-ZiUtQ0Aj) Ràdio Caldes 107.8 fm, Radio Granollers a la carta, por TDT para las comarcas del Vallès canal 515 y por internet: www.radiocaldes.cat y Ràdio Granollers a la carta. areahermeticaradio@gmail
Orta Çağ, Aydınlanma döneminde ortaya çıkan fikirleri yansıtabilecek en önemli kavramlardan biridir. Aydınlanma dönemi filozoflarının fikir dünyası üzerinde çalışanlar, eğer öğrenci pozisyonundan kurtulmazlarsa dönem hakkında fikir yürütürken belirli şablonların dışına çıkamayacaklardır. Bu da Orta Çağ kavramının temsil ettiği dönem hakkında farklı fikirlere geçit vermeyecektir. Bugün Türkiye'de hâlâ Orta Çağ karanlığı gibi Aydınlanma dönemi kavramlarının yaygın bir şekilde kullanılması farklı fikirlere geçit verilmemesinin baş sebebidir. Hâlbuki bugünkü Avrupa Orta Çağ olarak bilinen bu uzun dönemde şekillenmişti. Tabiri caizse Avrupa'nın çocukluk dönemi Orta Çağ'dır ve onlar için bu dönem hiçbir zaman kaybolmayacaktır. Ne zaman çocukluk dönemine inmek isteseler muhakkak Orta Çağ'a bakacaklardır. O zaman Avrupa kavramının kuşatıcı bir kimlik olarak çok yeni olduğu daha iyi anlaşılır. Norbert Elias, kültür ve uygarlık arasındaki farkı kolonyal yayılmacılık ekseninde tartışmıştı. Avrupa'da milliyetçilik kavramı aynı eksende tartışılır. Aydınlanma filozlarının fikirlerini kolonyal yayılmacılık dönemi bağlamında açıklamak herhalde ufuk açıcı olacaktır. Neredeyse bütün tanımlamalar aksi yöndeki fikirleri ifade etse de Avrupa fikri çok sağlam temeller üzerine inşa edilmemiştir. Bugün bunu çok daha iyi görüyoruz. Anglosakson, Norman, Germen, Slav, Grek ve Latin kavramalarının daha fazla öne çıkacağı bir döneme doğru gittiğimiz çok açıktır. Avrupa kavramı emperyal bir vizyonu yansıtmaktaydı. Kendi içinde birbiriyle rekabet eden ve uzun savaşların sonunda mutabakatlarla belirlenen merkezler vardı. Bu merkezleri aynı kategoriye dâhil etmek kolay değildi. On dokuzuncu yüzyılda en önemli merkez Londra idi. Avrupa Birliği gibi oluşumları da bu merkezlerden birinin hâkimiyeti çerçevesinde anlamak gerekir. Yahudi-Hıristiyan medeniyeti kavramı sorgulamadan muaf değildir. Hem Avrupa Birliği hem Yahudi-Hıristiyan medeniyeti Anglosakson imzasını taşır. Bunların dönemine göre kuşatıcı kavramlar olarak sunulması şaşırtıcıydı. Yahudi-Hıristiyan medeniyeti kavramı bugün hâlâ sorgulanmamaktadır. ABD ve İsrail Yahudi-Hıristiyan medeniyetlerinin uzlaşmasının bir sonucu mudur yoksa bu iki kolonyal yapı Anglosakson emperyalizminin başarı hanesine mi yazılmalıdır? Bu sorunun ciddiyetle tartışılması gerekir. Bu iki kolonyal devlet, Anglosakson yayılmacılığının eseridir ve kendi içinde birçok ortak özelliğe sahiptir. İkisi de Anglosaksonların yerleşimci kolonyalizminin bütün özelliklerini üzerinde taşımaktadır. İkisi de yayılmacıdır ve başarılarının temelinde etnik temizlik vardır.
The European football championships have kicked off, so it's time to talk sports! Join Olivia and Aran as they crack open a cold one or several and take a look at the long history of football in Europe, as well as the almost-as-long history of football hooliganism. In doing so, we will try to understand why there have been so many attempts to ban the sport....that is to say, why every attempt to do so has failed!For more on some of what we discuss, check out:Quest for excitement : sport and leisure in the civilizing process (Chapter 5) by Norbert Elias and Eric Dunning https://archive.org/details/questforexciteme00elia/Football in Medieval England and in Middle-English Literature by F.P. Magoun, Jr.https://www.jstor.org/stable/1838470Sport and Social Hierarchy in Medieval England by Thomas S. Henrickshttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43609079Two poems about James Dog by William Dunbarhttps://allpoetry.com/poem/15427673-Of-James-Dog--Madame--ye-heff-a-dangerous-dog--by-William-Dunbar
Wie erkläre ich’s meinem Kind? (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung FAZ)
Sonst sind Erwachsene oft für Ruhe und Besonnenheit, beim Fußball aber brüllen und schimpfen sie wie verrückt. Wie kann das sein? Die Professoren Durkheim und Luhmann können es erklären.
In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history
In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science
In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey discusses the past and future of citizenship with David Jacobson, Professor of Sociology at the University of South Florida (Tampa). They discuss the origins of the concept of citizenship in the ancient Near East a few thousand years ago and how kinship notions shape the debate on citizenship even in our own time. In their recent book Citizenship: The Third Revolution (Oxford UP, 2023), Jacobson and his co-author, Manlio Cinalli, turn to the experience of the medieval guilds as an alternative that may help rejuvenate the institution of citizenship today. The conversation closes with a discussion of Jacobson's project on violence among the Vikings and how the monopolization of the legitimate means of violence contributes to the decline of violence in societies, as Norbert Elias argued that it did.
La agencia de detectives más famosa de la radio española, capitaneada por el filósofo José Antonio Marina, abre sus minutos de investigación con todas las propuestas y opiniones que nos han hecho llegar los escuchantes alrededor del acoso escolar a petición de nuestro colaborador. Algunos nos comentan que el silencio es el gran aliado de los acosadores y que hay que animar a las víctimas a que lo cuenten. Otros, como un escuchante que nos sigue desde Orleans (Francia), nos cuenta que allí están muy preocupados y que van a introducir “educación emocional”, especialmente enfocada en la empatía. Y aunque nuestro caso de la semana pasada (el acoso escolar) aún no está cerrado, es el momento de asumir nuevos retos. Parece que los “buenos modales” no están de moda. Dicen ahora que “hay que ser auténtico” y además las nuevas tecnologías fomentan un trato brusco. Sin embargo, lo que coloquialmente se ha venido llamando buena educación ha importado. Y mucho, especialmente si tenemos en cuenta que un gran historiador como Norbert Elias estudió la historia de la urbanidad como una señal de progreso de la civilización. Nuestra tarea de la próxima semana, investigadores, tiene que ver con los buenos modales. Quizá ha llegado el momento de elaborar un código de urbanidad en línea con los tiempos… Escuchar audio
Diretamente das terras distantes da Hungria moderna, em regiões de nome impronunciável para nossa bancada, a condessa sangrenta Erzsébet Báthory, ou Elizabeth Bathory para os amantes da língua inglesa, foi responsável por anos de terror e inúmeras vítimas na virada do século XVI para o século XVII. A lenda tornou-se maior do que a personagem histórica. Vampira, bruxa, assassina, torturadora, sádica, imortal… Em meio a tantos mitos, o RdMCast dessa semana explora a história da condessa de sangue e as diversas adulterações que se deram ao longo de séculos para criar a imagem da assassina que se banhava em sangue de virgens. Pegue sua espada, seu cavalo e junte-se a nós na busca pela história de Erzsébet Báthory. O RdMCast é produzido e apresentado por: Gabriel Braga, Gabi Larocca e Thiago Natário. Apoie o RdM e receba recompensas exclusivas: https://apoia.se/rdm ou https://app.picpay.com/user/republicadomedo CITADOS NO PROGRAMA: Infamous Lady: The True Story of Countess Erzsébet Báthory – Kimberly Craft The Private Letters of Countess Erzsébet Báthory – Kimberly Craft A Condessa Drácula (1971) Báthory (2008) A Condessa (2009) Chastity Bites (2013) CITAÇÕES OFF TOPIC: Coração Valente (1995) Escravas do Desejo (1971) A Solidão dos Moribundos – livro, Norbert Elias (1982) EPISÓDIOS CITADOS: RdMCast #330 – American Horror Story (Temporadas 4-6) Siga o RdM Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/Rep%C3%BAblicadoMedo Instagram: @republicadomedo Twitter: @Rdmcast Entre em contato através do: contato@republicadomedo.com.br PODCAST EDITADO POR Felipe Lourenço ESTÚDIO GRIM – Design para conteúdo digital Portfólio: https://www.behance.net/estudiogrim Instagram: @estudiogrim Contato: designgrim@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
durée : 00:43:35 - Signes des temps - par : Marc Weitzmann - Chacun voit la décivilisation à l'œuvre selon la conception qu'il se fait de son contraire. "Décivilisation" le mot employé à tort et à travers, est donc un signe de l'angoisse des Temps. Mais comment Norbert Elias l'employait-il, et pourquoi son œuvre résonne-t-elle aujourd'hui ? - invités : Cédric Moreau de Bellaing sociologue; Nathalie Heinich Sociologue, directrice de recherche au CNRS (Centre national de la recherche scientifique)
If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history
If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/southeast-asian-studies
If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology
If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology
If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network.
If you've visited Thailand even for a short time you've probably been given, or have come across, some basic instructions on dos and don'ts — where to put, or not to put, your hands and feet, what to wear or not to wear to a temple, why not to get angry in public, that sort of thing. Perhaps you've wondered about the pedagogies that give these social practices their durability. And whether you've been to the country or not you might have seen news reports showing prime ministers and army generals prostrate in front of members of the royal family, and have wondered how almost a century after the demise of the absolute monarchy deference to sovereign power is so resolutely performed. If so, then you've come to the right podcast! On this episode of New Books in Southeast Asian Studies one of the channel hosts, Patrick Jory, sits on the interviewee's side of the microphone to talk about his A History of Manners and Civility in Thailand (Cambridge University Press, 2021). In a wide-ranging discussion Patrick outlines how manners have been codified over successive periods in Thailand; why Norbert Elias is still relevant for an understanding of the civilizing process not only in Europe but beyond, and the pertinence historical research for interpreting Thai society and politics into the 21st century. Like this interview? If so you might also be interested in: Patrick Jory, Thailand's Theory of Monarchy Roderic Broadhurst et al, Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia Yoshinori Nishizaki, Dynastic Democracy: Political Families of Thailand Nick Cheesman is Associate Professor, Department of Political & Social Change, Australian National University. He hosts the New Books in Interpretive Political & Social Science series on the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day
In dieser Folge fragen wir uns, ob das Laufen als eine Art Türöffner zum "wahren Selbst" dienen kann. Findet eine Form der Demaskierung statt an deren Ende der rohe innere Kern unserer Persönlichkeit zum Vorschein kommt? Des Weiteren debattieren wir die oftmals synonyme Verwendung der beiden Begriffe Joggen und Laufen. Meinen die beiden Wörter das gleiche oder gibt es Unterschiede? Christian berichtet vom eigenen Training im knietiefen Schnee und Juliane problematisiert die Unmöglichkeit für Frauen aufgrund einer Schwangerschaft einen Startplatz kostenfrei ins nächste Jahr zu übertragen.
In this conversation with Kasia Krzyżanowska, Johannes Voelz discusses his theory of the aesthetics of populism, explains how Pierre Bourdieu and Norbert Elias can help us understand contemporary populism, elaborates on the concept of a (Trump) rally, talks about the culture of a dichotomized world, and shares his insights on the role of culture in helping to ease the deep political conflicts.
Gut durch die Zeit. Der Podcast rund um Mediation, Konflikt-Coaching und Organisationsberatung.
Prof. Dr. Fritz Bernhard Simon, fbs: Zunächst Studium der Medizin und Soziologie sowie im Anschluss Ausbildung zum Psychiater und Psychoanalytiker. Mitgründer des Heidelberger Instituts für systemische Forschung, Therapie und Beratung. 1982-1989 - Mehrere Jahre leitender Oberarzt der psychoanalytischen Abteilung an der Heidelberger Universität sowie späterhin von 1999-2004 Professor für Führung und Organisation am Wittener Institut für Familienunternehmen (Universität Witten-Herdecke). Zudem Mitgründer und Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter des Carl-Auer-Verlags, Heidelberg, und Mitgründer des Organisationsberatungsunternehmens Simon, Weber & Friends GmbH. Obendrein ein höchst produktiver Verfasser von Fachbüchern und -artikeln zu allen relevanten Aspekten von Beratungsarbeit in unserer Zeit.
Was bedeutet Deutsch sein? Angeregt durch die Aussagen der Union und FDP, der deutsche Pass solle nicht “verramscht” werden, in Bezug auf die Bestrebungen der Ampelregierung das Einbürgerungsrecht zu reformieren, haben Samira und Friedemann sich über den “Wert” der Staatsbürgerschaft ausgetauscht. Beide erzählen von ihrem Aufwachsen, mit und ohne deutschen Pass, wie gut sich Stempel anhören und nähern sich den Fiktionen nationaler Identität und vermeintlicher Geburtsrechte mithilfe der Philosophinnen Donatella Di Cesare und Hannah Arendt und der Soziologen Steffen Mau und Norbert Elias. Was hat es mit der Idee des Deutschseins, der Integration (Integration in was?) und der Nation an sich auf sich? Passend dazu stellte Erik Marquardt diese Woche die Frage nach den Narrativen nationaler Identität. Bücher und Referenzen Steffen Mau: Sortiermaschinen - Die Neuerfindung der Grenze im 21. Jahrhundert: https://www.chbeck.de/mau-sortiermaschinen/product/32405836 Donatella Di Cesare im Gespräch mit Wolfram Eilenberger in Sternstunde Philosophie auf YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtFeyO8gYEk Ihr Buch "Philosophie der Migration": https://www.matthes-seitz-berlin.de/buch/philosophie-der-migration.html Norbert Elias, John L. Scotson: Etablierte und Außenseiter: https://www.suhrkamp.de/buch/etablierte-und-aussenseiter-t-9783518383827 (Leseprobe hier abrufbar: https://www.transcript-verlag.de/media/pdf/20/45/b8/ts5092_1.pdf) Es gibt bei Steady jetzt die Option, dass man Piratensender Powerplay Premium-Mitgliedschaften verschenken kann, also falls ihr noch ein Weihnachtsgeschenk sucht, werft gerne einen Blick in “Gift a Membership” weiter unten auf https://steadyhq.com/en/piratensenderpowerplay/about :) Frohe Adventszeit!
Piše: Leonora Flis Bere: Igor Velše Knjiga Blaža Kosovela Zakaj ZDA nimajo ministrstva za kulturo temelji na avtorjevi disertaciji Rojstvo postmodernizma iz duha Amerike. Znanstveni temelji monografije so očitni. Knjiga je natančen sociološki, zgodovinski in kulturološko-antropološki pregled ne le razvoja ZDA, temveč tega, čemur pravimo civilizacija nasploh. Kosovel začne svojo analizo v antičnem Rimu in nas prek najpomembnejših postaj v evropski zgodovini popelje v ZDA. Kot avtor že v uvodu pove, so ZDA resnično zanimiv primerek države, ki svojo kulturo izvaža po vsem svetu, ob tem pa nima ministrstva za kulturo. ZDA niso zgrajene po enakih načelih kot evropske države, predvsem gre v njih za logiko ekonomske svobode in svetosti zasebne lastnine. Prvi del knjige ima naslov Rim: cultura, civis in religio, drugi del z naslovom Evropa: moderna družba, civilizacija in kultura se osredotoča na staro celino, tretji del pa, kot že rečeno, v precep vzame nastanek in razvoj Amerike in ima naslov ZDA: Nova civilizacija. Kosovel z akademsko dikcijo (knjiga vsebuje veliko citatov in sprotnih opomb) ustvari kompleksno sliko razlike med staro celino in ZDA, pri tem se opira na velika imena, kot so John Locke, Norbert Elias, Benedict Anderson, Zygmunt Bauman, Hannah Arendt, Michel Foucault in drugi. Kot pravi Hannah Arendt, se je »koncept kulture najprej pojavil sredi prvenstveno poljedelskega ljudstva in umetniške konotacije, ki so bile morebiti povezane s to kulturo, so zadevale tesno povezavo latinskih ljudi z naravo«. Od nekdaj je kultura je označevala tudi skrb za spomenike in za ohranjanje dediščine. Stari Grki pa so raje kot o kulturi govorili o umetnosti. Polis je kraj (mesto), kjer je umetnost mogoča; starogrški svet je bil svet slavne sedanjosti, pravi Kosovel, in ne dediščine preteklosti. Pravi koncept kulture nastane z namenom oblikovanja privatnega prostora, tako v smislu zemlje v zasebni lasti kot tudi lastne duše. Kultura, kot jo poznamo na evropski celini, je torej najprej stvar privatnosti in ne splošne javnosti. Kosovel se ustavi tudi pri renesančnem oblikovanju individuuma, ki ni le abstrakten filozofski koncept, ampak drugačno vedenje v medosebnih odnosih in v razumevanju samega sebe. V renesansi se slog zahodnega sveta oblikuje na dvorih, začne se tudi tekma v kulturnem prestižu, tekma v tem, kdo pozna in lahko vabi boljše umetnike in kulturne ustvarjalce. V knjigi Zakaj ZDA nimajo ministrstva za kulturo beremo: »Rafiniranje in kultiviranje je odmikanje od vsega, kar je razumljeno kot naravno, v svet umetno ustvarjenega, posredovanega, svet, ki je postavljen kot višji in zato tudi boljši in pomembnejši.« Šele z novim vekom se razumevanje kulture zasnuje tako, da se kulturo razume kot nekaj, kar se lahko prenese tudi na množice, da ni nujno zgolj domena elit. Narod je torej mogoče kultivirati ali civilizirati, eno od osnovnih orodij za dosega tega cilja je seveda izobraževanje. Kultura je bila za Evropo od samega začetka pojem za preoblikovanje ali kultiviranje ljudi na določenem ozemlju države, pojasnjuje Kosovel, kultura je bila način homogenizacije prebivalstva. Če v Evropi veljajo tudi pravila dedne aristokracije, v ZDA ni bilo tako. Dedne aristokracije tam ni, vse od samega formiranja države pa vlada načelo oblikovanja nove čistosti, privilegiranosti bele rase. Ameriška družba je zgrajena na fundamentalno drugačnih temeljih kot evropska in zato kulture pravzaprav ni potrebovala. Vzpostavljanje ideje nove čistosti seveda prinese s seboj ropanje, genocid, zasužnjevanje lokalnega prebivalstva in suženjske delovne sile iz Afrike. Amerika je utemeljena na rasni hierarhiji in belem supremacizmu. Tako Kosovel pojasnjuje temelje, na katerih so se oblikovale ZDA (skozi migracije, kolonizacijo, segregacijo in tako dalje). Institucija kulture v ZDA umanjka, saj je poudarek na političnih institucijah, ki favorizirajo pridobivanje nove lastnine, in na idealih, kot sta svoboda govora in svoboda zavesti. Namesto kulture, piše Kosovel, obstajajo ameriške sanje«. Ameriškega naroda ne ustvarjajo humanistični intelektualci, temveč inženirji in znanstveniki. Kljub temu se je konec 19. stoletja tudi v ZDA oblikovala visoka kultura, ki je namenjena elitam, denar zanjo pa priskrbijo bogati kultivirani posamezniki. Tudi vzpostavljanje kulturnih institucij (knjižnic, muzejev ...) poteka mimo oziroma neodvisno od javnih ustanov. Administracija, torej vladna sekcija ZDA, pa je vendarle pograbila tisto manj zahtevno, množično kulturo, ki jo ZDA oblikujejo, to je predvsem kultura potrošništva, ki so jo ZDA izvozile praktično povsod po svetu. Kultura je v ZDA postala še ena oblika ekonomije, prostor konzumacije. Izvažanju množične kulture smo priča vsak dan, amerikanizacija je preplavila svet. Blaž Kosovel dobro in prepričljivo utemeljuje svojo tezo, ki jo je izpostavil v naslovu knjige, tako da je natančno preučil oblikovanje ZDA in ga primerjal z oblikovanjem evropskih nacionalnih držav. Za Evropo je »kultura tisto mesto, ki legitimira oblikovanje narodov s tem, da oblikuje skupno zgodovino,« ugotavlja. Ameriški narod pa se je oblikoval predvsem kot ideja za prihodnost. Kredo, na katerem je utemeljena Amerika, je sekularizirana oblika protestantizma; ZDA ne potrebujejo ničesar drugega kot institucije, ki omogočajo prosti trg, ekonomsko svobodo; kultura, ki bi zasedala polje javnega, je torej nepotrebna. Kosovelovo delo Zakaj ZDA nimajo ministrstva za kulturo je izčrpno, ne sicer najlažje branje, ki prinaša pronicljive vpoglede in analize.
Najnowszy odcinek podcastu #2historykow1mikrofon pt. "Otwarta dyplomacja" jest dostępny online. Spotkanie rozpoczęliśmy od wnikliwej analizy podróży jednego z nas. W części poświęconej nowym starożytnościom jeden z nas opowiadał o specyficznych pomnikach indywidualnej pamięci. Drugi z nas opowiadał o skomplikowanych drogach podniebnych trunków i wartości dodanej wafelków. W ramach opowieści o książkach jeden z nas przedstawiał niepozorną a ważną i odważną publikację poświęconą administracji wczesnopiastowskiej. Drugi z nas opowiadał o specyficznej monografii korygującej biografię klasyka myśli socjologicznej blisko związanego z historią. W zasadniczej części odcinka zastanawialiśmy się nad rolą dyplomacji w dziejach i współczesności wspólnot ludzkich. Bardzo mocno akcentowaliśmy znaczenie organizacji i realizacji działań dyplomatycznych. Profesjonalny charakter dyplomacji to znak docenienia relacji z otoczeniem, sygnał gotowości do rozmowy, otwartości i zrozumienia sieciowej natury świata ludzkiego. Zaniedbywanie dyplomacji, czy też wręcz wykorzystywanie dyplomacji do wzmagania konfliktu, było i jest smutną oznaką zamykania się społeczeństw i ich elit, izolowania od uniwersum ludzkiej cywilizacji i kultury. Ramówka: - Rozgrzewka:)) - Nowinki / starowinki - 5:10 - Lektury - 22:19 - Temat przewodni - 41:57 Pełny tekst opisu zamieściliśmy na stronie internetowej naszego projektu: http://2historykow1mikrofon.pl/otwarta-dyplomacja/ Wymienione w czasie audycji publikacje i materiały: - Joseph Garncarz, Korrektur eines Selbstbildes. Norbert Elias uns ein akademischer Lebenslauf, Magdeburg 2021, https://www.halem-verlag.de/produkt/korrektur-eines-selbstbildes/ (ostatni dostęp: 26.10.2022) - Krzysztof Fokt, Organizacja grodowa w drugiej monarchii piastowskiej. Studium krytyczne, Kraków: Societas Vistulana, 2022. https://vistulana.pl/produkt/organizacja-grodowa-w-drugiej-monarchii-piastowskiej-studium-krytyczne/ (ostatni dostęp: 26.10.2022) #2historyków1mikrofon Krzysztof Ruchniewicz Blog: www.krzysztofruchniewicz.eu Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/krzysztof.ruchniewicz.3 Instagram: www.instagram.com/ruchpho/ Twitter: twitter.com/krzyruch YouTube: www.youtube.com/channel/UCT23Rwyk…iew_as=subscriber Przemysław Wiszewski Blog: www.przemysławwiszewski.pl Facebook: www.facebook.com/przemyslaw.wiszewski Instagram: www.instagram.com/przewisz/ Twitter: twitter.com/wiszewski YuoTube: www.youtube.com/channel/UCuq6q08E…iew_as=subscriber Do nagrania intro i outro wykorzystaliśmy utwór RogerThat'a pt. „Retro 70s Metal” (licencja nr JAM-WEB-2020-0010041).
Als Joost vroeger -dat was nog voor ie Maureen trouwde- een date had, dan legde hij de date drie opties voor. Een daarvan was een rondleiding bij de gehaktballenfabriek in Vianen. Nooit heeft een vrouw voor die optie gekozen. Dat wilde Hans wel eens meemaken, zo'n rondleiding. Op naar Vianen, Joost met zijn auto, Hans met de Audi A2. Dat was omdat we na afloop ieder een andere kant op moesten. Waar spreek je dan af? Hotel Van de Valk Vianen natuurlijk, makkelijk te vinden, aan de snelweg, kan Joost daar bij Hans instappen, microfoons opspelden, aanzetten en naar de gehaktballenfabriek. -GPS 51.98981, 5.08392 -Kickstart Tom Bombadil Finale -Atom and Archetype: The Pauli / Jung Letters, 1932-1958 -Filmpje Kort Verband Vrijwilliger NIMH -Norbert Elias, Het civilisatieproces, Boom 2021 -Spencer Davis Group, I am a Man -Which woman hasn't been bombarded by unsolicited help from men?
The keyword in the title of this often overlooked essay in Écrits is “subject.” No surprise there! But notice how Lacan presents the subject at essay's end:Why and how the subject functions “a joint” — and not just any joint, but a joint between “the consequences of language and the desire for knowledge” — are the primary questions in part two of our podcast "On the Subject Who is Finally in Question."Along the way, we define subjects as symptoms as signifiers apart from signs and representational logics, with identity formations in the digital age as touchstones throughout. Lo! the networked self of late-modernity! Which is not the same, of course, as somebody sitting on a toilet. More like a dictionary shot through with desire. Or so this episode suggests. You'll also hear one-line definitions of objet a, castration, holding environments, and the sinthome, along with shoutouts to Heidegger and Norbert Elias, a two-minute crash course on consumer logics of desire, another round of truths detoured in knowledge, and a final word on those bloody velvet shirts stuck to our skin.Stay tuned for two more episodes next week. “Variations on the Standard Treatment,” here we come!And I look forward to seeing y'all live and in-person (at least via Zoom) on Wednesday, the 28th, for our opening session on THE DRIVE! Link below for all the key details. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit lecturesonlacan.substack.com
Morre em Amsterdã em 1º de agosto de 1990, o sociólogo Norbert Elias aos 93 anos. De família judaica, ele teve de fugir da Alemanha nazista e se exilou em 1933 na França, antes de se estabelecer na Inglaterra, onde passaria grande parte de sua carreira.Veja a matéria completa em: https://operamundi.uol.com.br/historia/30356/hoje-na-historia-1990-morre-o-sociologo-alemao-norbert-elias-aos-93-anos----Quer contribuir com Opera Mundi via PIX? Nossa chave é apoie@operamundi.com.br (Razão Social: Última Instancia Editorial Ltda.). Desde já agradecemos!Assinatura solidária: www.operamundi.com.br/apoio★ Support this podcast ★
Hechos con Palabras - Norbert Elias by Radiotelevisión de Veracruz
Nesse episódio os três odiados problematizam a ideia já consagrada de "jeitinho brasileiro". Para tanto, utilizam autores já clássicos nesse debate, como Gilberto Freyre e Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, mas também trazem contribuições mais contemporâneas, como a de Chico de Oliveira. Passeando pela ideia de construção de caráter nacional, a partir de Norbert Elias, eles buscam traçar os elementos para a compreensão daquilo que faz do Brasil aquilo que ele é. Bateu a curiosidade? Aperte o play e acompanhe esse papo que é tudo, menos óbvio.
Vox's Jamil Smith talks with journalist and author Eyal Press about "dirty work" — the jobs Americans do that, as Press explains, can lead workers to perform morally compromising activities unwittingly. They discuss examples of this kind of work (drone pilots, meat packers, prison aides), talk about its relation to the term "essential workers" that gained prominence during the pandemic, and explain how certain jobs highlight the disparities of class, race, and gender in American society. Host: Jamil Smith (@JamilSmith), Senior Correspondent, Vox Guest: Eyal Press (@EyalPress), author; journalist References: Dirty Work: Essential Jobs and the Hidden Toll of Inequality in America by Eyal Press (FSG; 2021) "What does it mean to take America's 'jobs of last resort'?" by Jamil Smith (Vox; Apr. 22) Empire of Pain: The Secret History of the Sackler Dynasty by Patrick Radden Keefe (Doubleday; 2021) The Social Network, dir. David Fincher (2010) The Jungle by Upton Sinclair (1906) The Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison (1952) The Civilizing Process by Norbert Elias (1939) "Good People and Dirty Work" by Everett C. Hughes (Social Problems, vol. 10 (1); 1962) The Line Becomes a River by Francisco Cantú (Riverhead; 2019) "Inside the Massive Jail that Doubles as Chicago's Largest Mental Health Facility" by Lili Holzer-Glier (Vera Institute of Justice; 2016) Enjoyed this episode? Rate Vox Conversations ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Subscribe for free. Be the first to hear the next episode of Vox Conversations by subscribing in your favorite podcast app. Support Vox Conversations by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by: Producer: Erikk Geannikis Editor: Amy Drozdowska Engineer: Patrick Boyd Deputy Editorial Director, Vox Talk: Amber Hall Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Philip Dwyer is Professor in the School of Humanities and Social Science at the University of Newcastle, Australia. He has published widely on the Revolutionary and Napoleonic eras, including a three-volume biography of Napoleon. He is the general editor of a four volume Cambridge World History of Violence, and co-editor of the Cambridge History of the Napoleonic Wars. He is the editor of The Darker Angels of Our Nature: Refuting the Pinker Theory of History & Violence. In this episode, we focus on The Darker Angels of Our Nature. We present Steven Pinker's argument about trends in violence across history. We then define “violence”, and talk about the limitations of historical sources of data. We talk about forms of violence that apparently have been on the rise recently. We discuss how to deal with death tolls in war. We talk about the historical and cultural context of violence, Norbert Elias' “civilizing process”, and the Enlightenment. Finally, we talk about factors identified by historians that play a role in violence trends, and ask if it is possible to objectively say that there has been moral progress. -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: KARIN LIETZCKE, ANN BLANCHETTE, PER HELGE LARSEN, LAU GUERREIRO, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, HERBERT GINTIS, RUTGER VOS, RICARDO VLADIMIRO, CRAIG HEALY, OLAF ALEX, PHILIP KURIAN, JONATHAN VISSER, JAKOB KLINKBY, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, PAULINA BARREN, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ARTHUR KOH, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, SUSAN PINKER, PABLO SANTURBANO, SIMON COLUMBUS, PHIL KAVANAGH, JORGE ESPINHA, CORY CLARK, MARK BLYTH, ROBERTO INGUANZO, MIKKEL STORMYR, ERIC NEURMANN, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, BERNARD HUGUENEY, ALEXANDER DANNBAUER, FERGAL CUSSEN, YEVHEN BODRENKO, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, DON ROSS, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, OZLEM BULUT, NATHAN NGUYEN, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, J.W., JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, IDAN SOLON, ROMAIN ROCH, DMITRY GRIGORYEV, TOM ROTH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, AL ORTIZ, NELLEKE BAK, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, NICK GOLDEN, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS P. FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, DENISE COOK, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, AND TRADERINNYC! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, IAN GILLIGAN, LUIS CAYETANO, TOM VANEGDOM, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, VEGA GIDEY, THOMAS TRUMBLE, AND NUNO ELDER! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MICHAL RUSIECKI, ROSEY, JAMES PRATT, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, AND BOGDAN KANIVETS!
durée : 00:37:51 - Le Temps du débat - par : Emmanuel Laurentin - De nombreux partis ont motivé leurs consignes de vote par la nécessité de faire "barrage" au RN, du fait de la présence de l'extrême-droite au second tour. Quel poids peuvent avoir ces consignes dans les résultats ? La notion de “front républicain” a-t-elle toujours un sens aujourd'hui ? - invités : Marion Fontaine Historienne, maître de conférences à l'université d'Avignon, co-directrice du centre Norbert Elias; Dominique Reynié Politologue. Professeur des Universités à Sciences Po.
This week's episode of The Encrypted Economy, our guests are Jennifer Cobbe from the University of Manchester and Dr. Heleen Janssen from the University of Amsterdam. We discuss what effective legal frameworks would look like in the face of rapidly changing technologies and changing interdependencies among people. Be sure to subscribe to The Encrypted Economy for more coverage of the innovations in blockchain and legal questions that arise from them.Topics Covered:· Introduction· Jennifer and Heleen's Background· Introducing the Concept of Figuration · How do we Consider Figuration Analysis in a Digital Age?· Role of Balances of Power in Figuration Analysis· Challenges With Implementing Figuration Analysis · How Does Current Regulation Fail to Contemplate Figuration? · Discussing Personal Data Storage· Discussing Jennifer and Heleen's Paper on Data Protection · How do we Ensure Collective Interests are Represented?· Closing Thoughts on the Philosophy of Law Resource List:· Heleen's Professor Profile· Jennifer's Website· Personal data ordering in context: the interaction of meso-level data governance regimes with macro frameworks· Personal information management systems: a user-centric privacy utopia?· The concept of figuration or configuration in Norbert Elias' sociological theory· GDPR· TEE – Thomas Dittmar, founder of Polypoly · Data protection and tech startups: The need for attention, support, andscrutiny Follow The Encrypted Economy on your favorite platforms! Twitter LinkedIn Instagram Facebook
Episode 24 : L'attente, une activité ordinaire, sociale et politique L'article original : Ruth Ayaß, "Doing Waiting: An Ethnomethodological Analysis", Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 49(4), 2020, p. 419‑455. --------- Les références citées dans l'article et mobilisées implicitement ou explicitement dans le podcast : Norbert Elias, La Société de cour, Paris, Flammarion, 2008 [1969]. Kimmo Svinhufvud, "Waiting for the customer: Multimodal analysis of waiting in service encounters", Journal of Pragmatics, 129, 2018. Adresse : https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/waiting-for-the-customer-multimodal-analysis-of-waiting-in-servic. --------- Autres références (non citées) : Harold Garfinkel, "Le programme de l'ethnométhodologie" dans L'ethnométhodologie : une sociologie radicale, La Découverte, 2001. Adresse : https://www.cairn.info/l‑ethnomethodologie–9782707133731-page-31.htm Micéala Symington et Jean Bessière, "Littérature et mémoire des territoires de l'attente" dans Alain Musset et Laurent Vidal (éd.) , Les territoires de l'attente : Migrations et mobilités dans les Amériques (XIXe-XXIe siècle), Des Amériques, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2017. Adresse : http://books.openedition.org/pur/41903 Une série de 4 belles émissions sur l'attente sur France Culture : https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/les-chemins-de-la-philosophie/lattente-14-vladimir-jankelevitch-le-meilleur-est-a-venir Pour la référence à Emily Dickinson : Emily Dickinson, Poésies complètes, édition bilingue. Nouvelle édition revue et corrigée par Françoise Delphy, Flammarion, 2020.
The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR. Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR. Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/japanese-studies
The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR. Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/food
The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR. Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR. Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/east-asian-studies
The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR. Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history
The overwhelming majority of tea practitioners in contemporary Japan are women, but there has been little discussion on their historical role in tea culture (chanoyu). In Cultivating Femininity: Women and Tea Culture in Edo and Meiji Japan (U Hawaii Press, 2019), Rebecca Corbett (USC East Asian Library) writes women back into this history and shows how tea practice for women was understood, articulated, and promoted in the Edo (1603–1868) and Meiji (1868–1912) periods. Viewing chanoyu 茶の湯 from the lens of feminist and gender theory, she sheds new light on tea's undeniable influence on the formation of modern understandings of femininity in Japan. Corbett overturns the iemoto 家元 tea school's carefully constructed orthodox narrative by employing underused primary sources and closely examining existing tea histories. She incorporates Pierre Bourdieu's theories of social and cultural capital and Norbert Elias's “civilizing process” to explore the economic and social incentives for women taking part in chanoyu. Although the iemoto system sought to increase its control over every aspect of tea, including book production, eighteenth- and nineteenth-century popular texts aimed specifically at women evidence the spread of tea culture beyond parameters set by the schools. The expansion of chanoyu to new social groups cascaded from commoner men to elite then commoner women. Shifting the focus away from male tea masters complicates the history of tea in Japan and shows how women of different social backgrounds worked within and without traditionally accepted paradigms of tea practice. The direct socioeconomic impact of the spread of tea is ultimately revealed in subsequent advances in women's labor opportunities and an increase in female social mobility. Through their participation in chanoyu, commoner women were able to blur and lessen the status gap between themselves and women of aristocratic and samurai status. Cultivating Femininity offers a new perspective on the prevalence of tea practice among women in modern Japan. It presents a fresh, much-needed approach, one that will be appreciated by students and scholars of Japanese history, gender, and culture, as well as by tea practitioners. This book is now available for free in open access at DOAB, ProjectMuse, and JSTOR. Takeshi Morisato is philosopher and sometimes academic. He is the editor of the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy. He specializes in comparative and Japanese philosophy but he is also interested in making Japan and philosophy accessible to a wider audience. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/gender-studies
C'est une chercheuse-rêveuse. Une chercheuse rattachée au centre Norbert Elias, une anthropologue qui enseigne à l'École nationale supérieure d'Architecture de Marseille, avec des sujets de recherche autour des rituels, des rêves et du sommeil . Des sujets qui laissent songeurs, j'allais dire. Formée à Milan, son sac à dos de chercheuse l'a conduite jusque dans les montagnes andines au Pérou, puis en Espagne, et enfin dans les quartiers Nord de Marseille, auprès de populations ayant vécu des violences politiques ou des traumas liés à l'immigration. En tout cas, des souffrances qui peuplent la nuit et son inconscient. Et il se trouve que lorsqu'elle ne dort pas, notre invitée Arianna Cecconi écrit son 1er roman Les oracles de Teresa où, tiens c'est drôle, son héroïne ne quitte pas son lit. Les choix musicaux d'Arianna Cecconi Chavela Vargas La Llorona Gatta Cenerentola Le lavandaie Keny Arkana J'ai osé
durée : 00:51:32 - Le Cours de l'histoire - par : Xavier Mauduit - Valorisation des salaires, sécurité des ouvriers, réduction du temps de travail, les mouvements ouvriers se saisissent de la grève comme outil révolutionnaire pour protester contre une organisation du travail oppressante, affirmer un contrepouvoir et renverser le système capitaliste. - invités : Marion Fontaine Historienne, maître de conférences à l'université d'Avignon, co-directrice du centre Norbert Elias
Neste episódio, conversamos com Ênio Passiani (mais informações em:http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do) , doutor em sociologia pela USP e professor da UFRGS, sobre a "descivilização digital". A partir da ideia de 'processo civilizador' do sociólogo Norbert Elias, debatemos a influência das redes sociais e do neoliberalismo no controle de nossas pulsões, sentimentos e emoções. O ambiente virtual nos civiliza ou desciviliza? Como o capitalismo lucra com os efeitos psíquicos das redes sociais? A Bibliografia recomendada é a seguinte: Christian Dunker - Psicologia das massas digitais e análise do sujeito democrático Byung-Chul Han - Psicopolítica, O neoliberalismo e as novas técnicas de poder Norbert Elias - O processo civilizador Norbert Elias - Os Alemães, a luta pelo poder e a evolução do habitus nos séculos XIX e XX Demais indicações feitas ao final do episódio. O “O Que é Tudo Isso?” agora é parte da Rede Colmeia Podcast's, mais informações em: https://colmeia.sul21.com.br/ Dúvidas críticas ou sugestões nos contate pelo oqueetudoisso@gmail.com, Você também pode nos seguir no Twitter (@OQTIPOD), instagram (oqtipod) e Facebook (o que é tudo isso podcast) Trilha:filmmusic.io "Great Times" de Sascha Ende (sascha-ende.de) CC BY 4.0 O presente trabalho foi realizado com apoio da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Código de Financiamento 001.
What's the deal with manners? The weird, often arbitrary rules that we abide and judge people by? In this episode we dive into where they come from, their purpose and some of the weirdest social conventions lost in time. Expert guest:Stephen Mennell is Professor Emeritus of Sociology at University College Dublin (which is the largest university in the confederal National University of Ireland). Stephen does research in Sociological Theory and Historical Sociology. His major books include All Manners of Food (1985) and The American Civilizing Process (2007). Professor Mennel is one of most influential contemporary thinkers and authors in the space of manners and conventions, his work reflecting on the works of Norbert Elias has helped further the field and reach a new audience for both Elias and himself.Guest comedian: Having started performing comedy in the summer of 2016, Jamie has quickly established himself as a rising star on the comedy circuit. He has reached the finals of the prestigious So You Think You're Funny? and The Musical Comedy Awards, as well as being shortlisted for the BBC New Comedy Award. Jamie was also the runner up at Hastings Fringe New Comedian Of The Year.Jamie's stand up has been described as a mix of short stories and one liners, delivered with an instant likability and an understated confidence. Covering a range of topics including veganism, his mixed race heritage and coming to terms with entering adulthood.Coming from a musical background, he is adept at both straight stand up and musical comedy.Jamie has appeared on the BBC Asian Network ‘Stand Up Show' which TX'd live on radio and featured on the iPlayer and ‘Comedy Central at the Edinburgh Fringe'. He currently performs at many clubs all across the UK, including The Comedy Store and Up The Creek.
Mit Disziplin und Fleiß noch mehr aus sich rausholen. Selbstoptimierung und Selbstverwirklichung ist das Motto unserer Zeit. Doch wo es Gewinner*innen gibt, muss es immer auch Verlierer*innen geben. Mit Michel Foucault und Norbert Elias blicken wir kritisch auf den Prozess der Selbstoptimierung im Neoliberalismus.
收听提示 1、道长和马家辉的友情岁月。 2、我们为什么怕鬼、怕黑? 3、什么是绝对的虚无? 4、安利动画片《小蜘蛛卢卡斯》。 本集相关 莫里斯·布朗肖 莫里斯·布朗肖 (法语:Maurice Blanchot,1907年9月22日-2003年2月20日),法国著名作家、思想家、欧陆哲学家。 1907年生于索恩-卢瓦尔,1923年升入斯特拉斯堡大学,学习德语和哲学,1925年终身挚友伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯相遇。在学习哲学的列维纳斯引介下,布朗肖开始接触现象学和海德格尔,又经由海德格尔,布朗肖深化了作为他核心论题的死亡哲学;而在德语领域,对应的则是同样身为犹太人的卡夫卡伴随了布朗肖的一生。1929年,布朗肖动身前往巴黎,以《怀疑论者的独断主义概念》在索邦大学学成学业。他的作品深深影响了法国思想界,尤其是后结构主义的哲学家,例如雅克·德里达等。 2003年布朗肖在法国逝世。由于其一生行事低调,中年后更是不接受采访与摄影,所以直到去世之前,大众甚至都不清楚这个被称为"法国二十世纪最著名的失踪者"是否尚在人世。 诺博特·伊里亚思 诺博特·伊里亚思(Norbert Elias,1897年6月22日-1990年8月1日),犹太裔德国社会学家。 于1897年6月22日出生在德意志帝国西里西亚省的布雷斯劳市,父母亲分别是荷曼跟苏菲·伊里亚思。父亲是从事纺织业的生意人,母亲则是家庭主妇。1915年他通过德国大学入学资格考试,之后自愿加入德军,参与第一次世界大战,被派任为电报兵,起初在东部战线,后来调到西部战线。在1917年他突然罹患神経衰弱,于是被判定不适合前线任务,调回弗罗茨瓦夫当医务人员。也就从这一年起,他开始到弗罗茨瓦夫大学研读哲学、心理学跟医学,并于1919跟1920年分别在海德堡大学及弗莱堡大学各上一个学期的课。在海德堡时,他曾到存在主义哲学家卡尔·雅思培的课堂听讲。 动画片《小蜘蛛卢卡斯》 小蜘蛛卢卡斯,是美国动画师约书亚·史莱斯(Joshua Slice)创作的动画角色,也是同名YouTube频道系列动画短片的主角。这一角色原型是一只跳蛛,由史莱斯的外甥卢卡斯配音。史莱斯自2017年11月起开始在YouTube发布小蜘蛛卢卡斯系列视频。卢卡斯的形象打破了观众对蜘蛛的固有看法,因此迅速在网络走红,被媒体称作"世界上最可爱的蜘蛛"。2018年3月,Fresh TV与史莱斯达成合作,计划在未来制作小蜘蛛卢卡斯的动画剧集或长篇电影。 本集音乐 Steve Vai 的《Knappsack》 本集推荐 马家辉播客《衰仔日记》点击收听 上集回顾 269. 马家辉代班:我的6个读书心法 《八分》每周三、周五晚8点更新 欢迎留言说出你的问题和建议
收听提示 1、道长和马家辉的友情岁月。 2、我们为什么怕鬼、怕黑? 3、什么是绝对的虚无? 4、安利动画片《小蜘蛛卢卡斯》。 本集相关 莫里斯·布朗肖 莫里斯·布朗肖 (法语:Maurice Blanchot,1907年9月22日-2003年2月20日),法国著名作家、思想家、欧陆哲学家。 1907年生于索恩-卢瓦尔,1923年升入斯特拉斯堡大学,学习德语和哲学,1925年终身挚友伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯相遇。在学习哲学的列维纳斯引介下,布朗肖开始接触现象学和海德格尔,又经由海德格尔,布朗肖深化了作为他核心论题的死亡哲学;而在德语领域,对应的则是同样身为犹太人的卡夫卡伴随了布朗肖的一生。1929年,布朗肖动身前往巴黎,以《怀疑论者的独断主义概念》在索邦大学学成学业。他的作品深深影响了法国思想界,尤其是后结构主义的哲学家,例如雅克·德里达等。 2003年布朗肖在法国逝世。由于其一生行事低调,中年后更是不接受采访与摄影,所以直到去世之前,大众甚至都不清楚这个被称为"法国二十世纪最著名的失踪者"是否尚在人世。 诺博特·伊里亚思 诺博特·伊里亚思(Norbert Elias,1897年6月22日-1990年8月1日),犹太裔德国社会学家。 于1897年6月22日出生在德意志帝国西里西亚省的布雷斯劳市,父母亲分别是荷曼跟苏菲·伊里亚思。父亲是从事纺织业的生意人,母亲则是家庭主妇。1915年他通过德国大学入学资格考试,之后自愿加入德军,参与第一次世界大战,被派任为电报兵,起初在东部战线,后来调到西部战线。在1917年他突然罹患神経衰弱,于是被判定不适合前线任务,调回弗罗茨瓦夫当医务人员。也就从这一年起,他开始到弗罗茨瓦夫大学研读哲学、心理学跟医学,并于1919跟1920年分别在海德堡大学及弗莱堡大学各上一个学期的课。在海德堡时,他曾到存在主义哲学家卡尔·雅思培的课堂听讲。 动画片《小蜘蛛卢卡斯》 小蜘蛛卢卡斯,是美国动画师约书亚·史莱斯(Joshua Slice)创作的动画角色,也是同名YouTube频道系列动画短片的主角。这一角色原型是一只跳蛛,由史莱斯的外甥卢卡斯配音。史莱斯自2017年11月起开始在YouTube发布小蜘蛛卢卡斯系列视频。卢卡斯的形象打破了观众对蜘蛛的固有看法,因此迅速在网络走红,被媒体称作"世界上最可爱的蜘蛛"。2018年3月,Fresh TV与史莱斯达成合作,计划在未来制作小蜘蛛卢卡斯的动画剧集或长篇电影。 本集音乐 Steve Vai 的《Knappsack》 本集推荐 马家辉播客《衰仔日记》点击收听 上集回顾 269. 马家辉代班:我的6个读书心法 《八分》每周三、周五晚8点更新 欢迎留言说出你的问题和建议
Aula sobre Norbert Elias. Pesquisa empírica de caráter etnográfico. Microssociologia. Os conceitos "estabelecidos" e "outsiders": relativos a determinadas figurações estruturadas. Auto-imagens, valores morais e disputas de poder. O papel do imaginário. A prática da maledicência: fofocas elogiosas e depreciativas. A sociodinâmica da estigmatização: relações de poder e pregnância das emoções. Comentário sobre o racismo. Mecanismos de segregação, de exclusão e desigualdade.
Parte 1: Breve histórico de Norbert Elias. Parte 2: Algumas características da sociologia de Elias: superação da dicotomia indivíduo-sociedade, análise macro e microssociológica. A sociologia dos processos de longo prazo: o processo civilizador. Sociogênese e psicogênese. Parte 3: O sociólogo como destruidor de mitos. Para uma sociologia do conhecimento e da ciência. O surgimento da sociologia. Sociologia e ideologia.
A trajetória intelectual de Norbert Elias. Uma sociologia da civilização ocidental. Uma definição sociológica do processo civilizador. A sociedade dos indivíduos: definições teórico-metodológicas. Uma tentativa de superar falsas dicotomias. Indivíduo, autorregulação e civilização. Sociogênese e psicogênese do processo civilizador. Síntese da tese de Elias e outras problemáticas políticas antropológicas: a civilização europeia e os processos de colonização.
Episode Notes Daniel Turner, Deputy Dean of the School of Business and Creative Industries at the University of the West of Scotland, joins host Annetta Latham to discuss the world of event bidding.** --------------------------------------------------------** Artful Conversations 2020 Dr. Daniel Turner Interview Welcome to Artful Conversations - a podcast about arts and cultural management. Hosts Annetta Latham and Katrina Ingram, interview leaders who help shape the world of arts and culture. We share their stories, their insights and observations. This podcast season has been brought to you with the support of MacEwan University and The Rozsa Foundation. ANNETTA: Welcome to Artful Conversations, I'm your host, Annetta Latham. We have Daniel Turner here with us today. Daniel is the deputy dean of the School of Business and the Creative Industries at the University of West of Scotland, UWS. His research interests focus upon social cultural exploration of events and sports and the use of such activities to generate income, social and cultural impacts. Daniel was going to be joined today by his co-author, David McGillivray, who is also a professor of events and digital cultures at the University of West of Scotland, but unfortunately, David has been called away. Daniel and David are the co-authors of Event Bidding: Politics, Persuasion and Resistance. Daniel, it's great to have you join us today. Thank you for being part of Artful Conversations. Can you tell us about your scholarly career pathway? DANIEL: Yeah, of course, actually the day that we're recording this, is my sixth work anniversary for UWS. I've been in academia full time since 2007, spent a few years working on my Ph.D. At the moment, as you say, I'm in the role of deputy dean of the School of Business and Creative Industries, but my academic background has always been in areas to do with sport and events, and my doctorate, which I completed at Glasgow Caledonian University over a very long period of time, looked at the growth of essentially adventure recreation publicly funded skate parks in Scotland using a figurational sociology approach with the work of Norbert Elias in there. So I've always had a real interest in the interplay between public policy and my undergraduate degree was in leisure management, so I guess what used to be called the leisure industry - sports events, tourism. So having come through with my PhD very much in the sport terrain, I started teaching at Glasgow Caledonian 13 years ago full time, and there my role took me across sports and events and increasingly my interest in public policy and the interaction between these areas, of events and in my case, sporting events, playing in developing cities, developing nations, growing their economies, what contributions you are making, always really trying to have a bit of criticality about claims that are advanced, when those types of things happened. So three years in that role led me up to Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, which is where you and I met for the first time, where I had the role of program leader for what was at that time, the new event management program up in Aberdeen. So working with colleagues to build that program from its first intake of students over a period of four years. And that's really where I started to become increasingly more and more focused on the role of events. Obviously, at the time you and I got to know one another, you were involved with the youth festival in Aberdeen. And a lot of my role there was about getting students to engage with these events and thinking again critically about how they might contribute to the visitor economy in a country which is, a city sorry, that was really starting to think of those questions, I guess in some ways for the first time. That was where event bidding started to come on to my horizon a little bit as well. At the time I was there Aberdeen was bidding for the UK City of Culture, it was quite interesting to look at some of the information around that and how we were trying to do that. And then six years ago, the opportunity to move back into the west of Scotland, which is home for me, came up. So I came back to the west of Scotland and started at UWS, again primarily there as a senior lecturer in event management teaching some of the same areas with some of the same issues. But in the last couple of years, I've kind of moved into the management and leadership side of working in a university, which isn't quite as much fun for doing research, but it's still an exceptionally challenging role. And a lot of my research interests are now starting to spin out into issues related to higher education, student engagement, I spent time overseas recently looking at how universities in Sri Lanka deal with academic engagement, but still maintaining this interest in essentially events and sport. So whilst at UWS event bidding has been my main area of focus, but also actually, interestingly, come back to some of the things that interested me originally with my colleagues, Sandro Carnicelli, who's one of our senior lecturers here, and parallel to working on the event bidding stream, Sandro and I developed some work around lifestyle sports and public policy. So almost going full circle back in the early 2000s. So that has been the last 13 years, I guess. ANNETTA: Coming back to what you mentioned before, you and I met when we were both living in Aberdeen and at the time Aberdeen was bidding for the City of Culture and which is a UK massive kind of regeneration policy and hope. So, when you mentioned before, kind of out of that became a little bit of interest around event bidding. What was it that really sparked your interest? Because I know, we both lived through that experience and we were both part of those initial early meetings where they were thinking about the bid and how to do it. You know, I went in one direction and you kind of have now taken that concept, and you've written a book, really. You know, for our listeners, what would you describe as what is event bidding, like what are you talking about when you're talking about that? DANIEL: OK, so there is essentially a series of events, whether sporting or cultural, which would be best be described as peripatetic, so they move from city to city, country to country, the most notable examples being the Olympics, World Cup, for example. And it was actually the FIFA World Cup that I think first certainly caught my interest in this, David, who can't be with us today, he and I worked together for a really long time, and we'd stayed in touch. And I had moved to Aberdeen and he was in Glasgow. And it was round about the time that Qatar was bidding to host the 2022 World Cup. And actually in preparing for today. I was going back through my notes and there were some emails that I just after I got into Aberdeen in 2010 saying this is interesting, someone should look at this. And we were kind of swapping a few messages back and forth about what that might look like, what that might be. A big part of that conversation, and subsequently became the event bidding book five years later. Yeah, but being in Aberdeen was really interesting to me because the City of Culture award was literally on your doorstep. Aberdeen is the third biggest city in Scotland, but it's a city of 100,000 people. So it's still a very compact city, it's a small place, everyone knows everyone. And so there was an opportunity to really see firsthand what was happening. And so Event Bidding essentially then relates to the process by which cities or countries or combinations of countries increasingly follow the case to an awarding body who typically are the owners of the event, that they should be allowed to host that event. And it's a process which is in some cases very lengthy, can be a number of years. It can be exceptionally costly and in some cases hundreds of thousands for small events, and tens of millions for large scale events. And I think we felt it was a process that often happens out with the public eye. Yeah, often it's only when the host is announced that people really started to understand it. So that's really what I mean by that process, is everything that happens before the moment someone stands up on stage and says ‘and the host is’ so we were interested in, I guess, the gestation of the event rather than the delivery of the event itself. ANNETTA: So what do you think are some of the key factors that kind of play into when a city bids for an event, you know, like where do you think the spark comes from that someone goes: Why don't we try and run the Olympics? DANIEL: I think there can be lots of things. And I think one of the things you say is there are factors that come into play. Some of it should and some of it shouldn't, but they come into play. I think you have to accept that for certain people, for certain organizations, these events are massive money makers, they are massive opportunities for certain people in certain types of business. So you often have very prominent figures within the local region thinking, well, if we could bring this in it will create investment in construction, will produce investment in tourism, or produce investment in hospitality or produce investment in all these different areas. So you often have that as a heavy area and a lot of places all over the world very much linked to a city or a country’s ‘sense of place’, and trying to position themselves within the world on a global scale, something like the Olympics, if you think about some of the countries that have hosted the Olympics in recent years, China or Brazil, for example. That's very much been about making a statement about being a world player. So there's a bit of statesmanship involved, but a lot of smaller events and particularly smaller cities and smaller national events like the City of Culture, often local authorities, local politicians will see it as an opportunity to drive regeneration. I think if you look in the UK, I appreciate some of these place names might not mean much to some of the people who might listen to this, but if you think of places like Hull, you think of places like Paisley, we’ve actually we've just gone through the process a couple of years ago of Paisley bidding for the UK City of Culture as well. These are places which should perhaps have seen a period of industrial decline and they're trying essentially a cultural regeneration approach to development. I think politicians like bidding contests because it's a fabulous image to be the politician who brought the event to the country, in fact, our prime minister was not involved in winning the bid and has made an awful lot of hay of being the mayor of London at the point when that came to town . So I think aspect things, I think in some countries and in some populations, there's also a sense within the population of this is the thing we do. You know, it's almost of course, we bid for events, of course we get involved in events. So there's a lot of disparate reasons, some of which are very well intentioned, some of which perhaps are slightly more self-serving, some of which are financial, some of which are political, some of which are, I guess, tangible, and some of which are intangible. ANNETTA: Yeah, I think your point there around the tangible and intangible is really interesting because, you know, in the research that I've been doing, looking at the cities that don't actually win the bid that go through the whole process, it's also about what they do after they've announced, you know, and the host is and their name is not the host, they don't win. There’s this whole thing around the journey they go on that you've been talking about. And in some elements, some of what happens is a little bit around this topic of soft power, you know, and finding our name and our identity in that. And, you know, soft power as opposed to military power. So from your perspective, how would you say that concept of kind of soft power sits into the narrative of event bidding? DANIEL: I think your point here about places which the one is really interesting because of course, some places will be bidding as part of a long term strategy of doing the types of events they might hold one event because ultimately they want to hold a different event. And it's about demonstrating capacity and capability and building their brand awareness essentially in a safe pair of hands. Glasgow, which is my home city, essentially has been very good at that over the last couple of decades. I think the notion of soft power is interesting because really what you see is events bring legitimacy. They bring a seat at the table. So if you look, for example, for China, really hosting the Olympics was the culmination of their emergence as a global superpower. It was almost that last moment of saying, well, here we are. We are not only actually economically, politically strong. We are able to host the biggest and the largest. I think if you look at places like Qatar, very small but very rich country, they have really used events as a means of securing access to possibly a much bigger place on the global stage than they might otherwise have. So whether that's in trade negotiations, whether that's in discussions with other countries. But now we know where Qatar is, we know who Qatar are. And I think this is really interesting literature, for example, Australia holding the Asian Cup a few years ago about how that was used as a means for Australia to leverage investment from China, as well. So it's very much that hidden level of power than the opposite of the hard military power, soft power is a more cultural influence, it is a more political influence. That suddenly you can't be ignored anymore. You are as a seat at the table and I think one of the discussions ahead of the Olympics, I think, in Brazil, it was essentially a coming out party for Brazil and again, as a time where Brazil was bidding to host the Olympics. It was one of the fastest growing economies in the world. It was the fifth largest economy in the world at that point. There is an interesting thing there, which is the point that we're bidding not so much at the point they were delivering 10 years later and how much that can change. Yeah, I think that that soft power can be underplayed. And actually, even again, if I think when Scotland famously held the Commonwealth Games in 2014 and it was no coincidence that the same year as we had the Commonwealth Games, we had a couple of very large national events in Scotland. The likes of Homecoming, there was an independence referendum shortly afterwards, which clearly was about Scotland standing on its feet as an independent nation, saying we can host these large scale events. So some of that can be soft power broadcast outwards to the world, some of it can be soft power broadcast inwards to the population to say this is who we are, this is what we do. And if you go really far back, the stories of South Africa hosting the rugby world cup after Apartheid that there are lots of stories of both inward and outward facing soft-power ANNETTA: Yeah, it's interesting, isn't it? Because it's certainly a narrative that is kind of rising to the top right now. And you can see, especially around cultural policy, some narrative around soft power that is certainly getting more traction than it would have got even 10 years ago. So, you know, in relation to the event bidding, because you've been involved in that sector now and looking at event bidding for a long time, would you say, apart from Covid, over the last several years, do you think there's been a shift in the purpose of why cities bidding or is it still the same, but they're just using modern, trendy language? DANIEL: I think there's been a shift in how we talk of bidding. And I think partially that's because, you know, event management as a field is still a relatively new field of academic study. But if I think working with David, David is the fabulous professor in this area, and has a very strong track record of producing interesting pieces of research. But David did a piece of work with my colleague Gayle MacPherson and Malcolm Foley around policy back in saying that it had been about 2010 maybe 2012, which was really one of the first times that people were being really critical of the narrative around events. In that last maybe 10, 15 years, we've started to pay more attention to the role that events play in cultural regeneration or urban regeneration, whatever we want to call that. And so because of that, they are becoming more critical in how we discuss it. I think 20, 30 years ago you could say we're going to host event X and it's going to make us millions. And there's been a host of authors and academics in the last 20 years have said, but will you?, really? And then they start to ask questions about when you say we, who do you mean? And then there have been questions about, well, is money the only thing we're interested in, or are we interested in social advancement, are we interested in environmental sustainability? Are we interested in any of these different issues? I think that because there's now a greater understanding of some of the claims that have been advanced in the past, there’s a greater skepticism towards it, a greater interrogation, towards it, the language we've used to talk about, of bidding is had to change the requirements on cities and countries are trying to bid are more detailed and nuanced than they’ve ever been. I think you also have the fact that I think the big thing for me has been there's been a professionalization of bidding now. Yeah, there are literally people who travel the world to leak and it's an exceptionally lucrative job. And as they've professionalized, so too we have much clearer criteria about what you're betting on and why you're betting what you're required to do to achieve the successful hosting of the event. So I think all of those things mean that we talk about it differently, we think about it differently, an event organizer sort of does have to talk a different language. ANNETTA: Yeah, they certainly do. One of the things that I found interesting in exploring the City of Culture narrative is the changing of cultural policies that cities are doing to match the bid process, and I think that's really interesting and it kind of comes you know, I want to circle back to your book because your book is around the event bidding process and the politics of that and the persuasion and resistance, and you published it in 2017. And thank you for the book on behalf of myself and other academics. I've certainly used it in my event management class, and it was fantastic. It was really, really good. So for you and David, you kind of mentioned earlier on that, you know, you'd started a little bit of an email narrative around what's going on. So how did you actually decide together that you were going to write a book on the email narrative? DANIEL: I think it was a lot of different things, David and I have known each other for a very long time, he’s not here, so I’ll embarrass him, David was my lecturer when I was an undergraduate student, he is much, much older than I am. And then subsequently my supervisor and we worked together for a number of years and we both had an interest in this area, and I think as most academics, I think in this I guess in this industry, this part of the industry, I think actually is most academic,. when they get together what we can talk about it is the subject tend to be passionate about thing, and that's why you teach it, and that's why you research it. So we really had been just as friends talking about or who's bidding and what are we seeing and why are the bidding? And at the time, I don't think the full scale of some of the concerns of Qatar’s World Cup bid, had really come out in the public domain. And so by that point, you're starting to see something suspicious here at the start. But actually, the campaign that they were running, the narrative they were writing around the event were really interesting, the way in which they were trying to gain traction and gain. We understood that. So we talked about that a lot as one conversation then during my time, another being with the city of culture, bid that was happening there. I, started to scope out some information around what happened in the city and interviewed some people and pulled together a conference paper around which I had taken a few different places and presented my initial thoughts around how bidding worked, David, at the same time coming off the back of what he had done. event policy was growing his interest in, I guess, the criticality of should advance what should be pushing these things. Who do they serve and how is consent manufactured around events? And by coincidence, we ended up both working together again. David had gone to the University of West of Scotland I think in 2010. And when I came back into the west of Scotland, we got together and said, well, is it time to do something with this. We've been talking about it for a really long time, we think there's something there. We sketched out what's now become the structure of the book, particularly I think the first maybe the chapters of the book around why do people get to the event and some of the more critical questions that should be asked. And that turned into a proposal for Routledge. Who came back and said that they felt it was something that was useful, something that was potentially quite timely at that point. So that would have been if we'd written that proposal around 2014, 2015. And so just coming off the back of the London Olympic Games, the back of the Glasgow Commonwealth Games. There were some quite big processes taking place at that of time. And so Routledge came back and said, yeah, we think there's something in this as well. I think they possibly saw David’s track record of publication. Yeah, has been very interesting. And that kind of led to let’s try to put the book into the world. And then two years of writing and reading and writing and reading eventually got it out there, in 2017/ 2018, it was fabulous to see it come together. It did have quite a long gestation period. ANNETTA: And what's co writing with an old friend like? DANIEL: It's a lot of fun, to be honest with you. The first thing I think that we should highlight is that we did most of the writing at David’s kitchen table. So the best part really was David's wife, Clare who is a lovely lady, bringing us bowls of soup and sandwiches. So I was in heaven for a large part of the process and probably that's why it took so long to be published. He’s really good, I think David is a fantastic academic. He's got a critical mind. I mean this in my book, it's my first book writing experience. So learning a huge amount. David, if he were here, I'm sure you would say wonderful things that we probably highlight that I need to learn when to use a comma. But it was a really positive experience. The only problem, though, is, again, come back up when you have two colleagues who have a passion about a subject. I seem to recall we may have spent the first two hours arguing about, so are we talking about sporting mega events or mega sporting events? And yeah, that's becoming an issue for the rest of the day, Well, I’m right no i’m right, but the exceptional learning experience for me, I hope if he were here, it was as enjoyable for him. We have written together since. ANNETTA: So there you go, you're obviously on the right track. So what's the response to the book been like? DANIEL: It’s been good with a couple of very nice reviews in academic literature, which is always good, we've had some really quite nice feedback queries to use with students that we found to be interesting. They found it to be an accessible book on a challenging topic, which I think is, whenever I write anything, I think I'm writing so it can be used. You've said very kind things today. So in that sense, it's been very positive. It seems to have made its way onto a few good reading lists, which is nice. I think we've had some nice comments from colleagues in the industry who have been interested in the area as well, who've said nice things about it. So it's been positive and very rewarding in that sense. ANNETTA: Yeah, I think one of the things for me that added incredible value to my class was the event bidding process gets students to focus on what happens prior to an event, even getting money, even those things, whereas often in event management, and I've been teaching that, you know, kind in the event management arena for eight or so years is that and been working in the field for a very long time, is that people usually look at the event and then do the post the event narrative. Like, you see this a lot out there that's written by some fantastic academics around the effect of the event on the community or economy or all of those things post event. But what's fantastic about this book, from my perspective as a teacher, is getting the students to focus on that stuff that, like you said earlier, can start seven, five, seven, eight, nine years before an event even occurs. And it's a great way to get emerging arts managers and emerging events managers to think with much more depth around this topic. If you're going to say, oh, well, let's host a city of culture, actually there's years and years of process here before you even get to put someone on the stage and make a beautiful speech. DANIEL: One of the things that really interested me, about 2007, I think it would have been, David and I ended up in Liverpool, Liverpool was just gearing up to be European City of Culture in 2008. And I can't remember what the conference was or what the event was. It was in Liverpool. But there was a keynote presentation from a guy called Bob Scott, who basically is a peripatetic bid director. He moved at that time, was moving from place to place, and he would lead the bid. And I remember distinctly was one of the things that was on my mind. And I think we quote Bob Scott almost. I think in the first couple of pages he talked to the fact that his job ends the minute someone says, yes, you can host, he leaves and then someone else comes in and actually does the delivery. And as a result of that, he was kind of an invisible figure, I didn't really know that these guys existed. And that for David and I was fascinating for a lot different reasons. I mean, the first is, the cost to the public purse of bidding for these events. I mean, there were figures being thrown around in the region, probably in Aberdeen in the high six figures. I think if you go back almost 20 years, England spent somewhere in the region of twenty to twenty six million pounds for the World Cup. For the last Olympic bid round, the one which ended up with the dual coronation of Los Angeles and Paris. If you added up budgets for every city that bid for either of those games, at some point it surpassed a billion dollars for the first time. What's really interesting about that is most of that money is probably coming out of the public purse. All of it spent with no guarantee of success and very, very little of it spent with the public knowing that's where the money's going and that's what's happening. But also, if you are successful and winning the right to host the games in the bid stage, particularly, again, for those big events, you are committing yourself legally and financially to some massive, massive investments and in some cases potential financial loss, in some cases to building venues and facilities that are going to last a lifetime, you hope. Again, very little attention being paid to. And how did that case get me something? I mean, if you look at the Vancouver Olympics, for example, by 2010, some of the implications I had for host communities, I think if you look at some of the potential implications, there's really interesting stuff coming out of America where they've had peripatetic events and some of the impact that had on things like civil liberties in those cities. And none of this really ever surfaces until someone opens the envelope and says and the host is, so that for us was really interesting to look at that hidden aspect and all the things that meant, and I think you made a point earlier about how places then become focused. Martin Muller is incredibly interesting in this area where he talks about essentially everything becomes focused in on the event, sometimes to the detriment of things that might otherwise be happening. So I think that's something that can set the agenda for a city or for a country for 10, 15 years with little oversight and little critique. ANNETTA: I want to pick up on something you mentioned a little bit earlier about the information not getting out there, because I think that also leads into what role the media plays in all of this process. You know, from your perspective in the research that you and David have done, where would you say the media sits in this bidding process - is it positive is it negative? Do they focus at the end or the beginning? What have you guys found in that narrative? DANIEL: Well, I think I mean, yes and no to everything almost simultaneously, and the media should have a role, as it should in any aspect of public life, of holding power to account, of critiquing, of challenging, of looking for accountability. And I think some of the more recent what David and I have done with John Lauerrmann has looked at the role, particularly new media plays in that. I think if you look at some places in the past and we talk about it in the book, the fact that it's a deliberate attempt often on the part of bid committees to bring the media into the tent. Perhaps too often or in some cases at the very least, the media can end up assuming the role of cheerleader for the bid. But that makes sense. There's a you know, a diet of nice, easy, friendly, publishable stories. You can lock yourself up in a patriotic fervour and support it. And often I think bid committees actively search for that because there's an analogy about better having people inside the tent than out which comes to mind. So I think the media has a role to play and being critical and holding the committee to account and asking questions about who is spending money and where are they spending money, but often I think historically they've been sucked into being cheerleaders for it rather than having that criticality. But that's where I think more recently we've been talking about the role of new media and new media and such as the media and whatever you want to call it. Yeah, challenging and holding to account. And there have been some really good examples and subsequently elsewhere. What would be, I guess, if we're talking in new media or traditional media, have they come in and said, well, actually, is that claim valid? Is that claim accurate? So the media has a massive, all encompassing role to play, it's just whether or not it always plays it effectively. ANNETTA: So in the field of further research, you know, we've just talked about what you have been looking into. In a recent project that you and David wrote together, you made a case for more participatory involved and collaborative research methods, as a way of better understanding this really, what is, a dynamic and a complex dynamic that is taking place in the event bidding process. So for you, what would that look like? What would that kind of research look like in the field moving forward? DANIEL: Well, I think that that more recent piece of research that you're referring to is a piece of work that David and I did with John Lauermann. John is an academic based in New York, and one of the fabulous things about academic life is we've never been in the same room as John. We really like John's work, which had looked a lot at some of the protest movements, particularly in Boston a few years ago. And we reached out to John and said, look, we like you a lot. Hopefully you like our work as well. Do you think we can collaborate on something so this paper came forward around the idea of new media activism? One of the things we've seen in the last, again, 10, 15 years and as a former colleague of ours, a former student of David’s, Jennifer Jones, actually, you know, Jen, did her PhD around citizen media around the Vancouver Olympics and protest media. And that's something that's really emerged in the last 10, 15 years with social media has been ordinary citizens forming protest movements and campaigning against in some cases historically, that's often came after the announcement of the host and in the build up to the delivery of the event. What we had spotted was in the most recent piece for me that was increasing the protest movement on the big stage and that was where John's work was useful in Boston. And so we can try to sit down as a trio and identify, well, what role is new media playing in the fact. And I think we got to the end of the world because we were able to see that the new media was playing a very strong role and shining a light on things. But actually where it was at its most effective is we have some of that new media protest aligned with traditional models of political activism. And almost this physical domain that we are a participatory democracy of going along to protest physically, going into committee meetings and asking difficult questions. And I think really what we were talking about was if those types of movements want to be effective, they have to recognize that there's an alignment between the digital world and the physical world. But also where they have been particularly effective was where new media enabled old media. Some might say enabled, some might say forced or are held to account to, to assume the more critical stance. So literally feeding them the stories and pointing them in the direction of, this is a question you should be asking. This is an area that's interesting. And so that's really what we mean by participating, trying to join the dots and see if we really are going to have an effective critique and a holding to account of the types of bid systems. If you want to use that language, then it has to be an alignment of new media and old media, digital protected physical protest. And I think that's really what we saw as a participatory involvement with this. ANNETTA: Fantastic. So with that rich content of future research, what are your plans for the next five years? DANIEL: Yeah, that's an interesting question. We've obviously just within the event bidding thing, we just finished two or three things. So the book itself and then a couple of things with John separately. In this area, I don't want to speak for David, as he's not here. But I know David is increasingly, through our centre that we have at UWS, interested in a range of different issues around mega events. So he's the supervising students with interest areas, and is looking at some of the uses of public space by private events, which are really interesting. And I'm really interested in something you mentioned at the start, which is the field that. I'm fascinated by having lived in two cities which have been unsuccessful in bids in the last 10 years, I don't know if that means I’m a jinx, and perhaps not be invited to cities that are bidding. But I'm really interested in what happens after a bid fails. Aberdeen has bid twice now and never got close to it again. And if they have. But again, what have they learned from the last time? If you're unsuccessful in bidding from one event, what happens when you go for a different event? I think that's an area that's really interesting. I think there's a lot of things that are really interesting around starting to interrogate rights holders of events, something we've not really told yet, but I'm fascinated by the power that, again, particularly in sporting the big event, right? Holders like FIFA and the IOC, the power they have with very little accountability. These are organizations that have economies essentially bigger than many countries, and they're able to enact massive influence on how countries behave, insisting on changes to legislation and insisting on changes to practice. I'd like to really look at some of those issues as well and start to interrogate that, whether or not my own personal career path lets me do that as much as I don't know. But I think that would be an area that would be really interesting to consider. What happens after the circus has left town? ANNETTA: So it sounds like a sabbatical year and a book. Another book in the pipeline. Hey, Daniel, I really want to thank you for your time with us today. Is there any pearl of wisdom that you would pass on in relation to your, the knowledge of, you know, that you got that you both learned and really investigating the bidding process? DANIEL: Oh, that's a big question. Definitely write with a co-author who provides you with regular sustenance, that's a big one. I think it's about the thing that I found really fascinating and personally fulfilling a promise and hopefully if people engage with the work they find useful is look for the thing that's not being looked up. You know, a thing went with these types of events these days with, What's the question that's not being asked. What's the area that was not shining a light on? Because I think for me that was the thing that was the thing that made it interesting to do. Was to say, well, hang on a second. Whenever someone tells you you can't look at something, you want to go behind the scenes and find out what's actually happening. I think that would be the thing. What's the question I want you to ask? Yeah. And why do you want you to ask that question? And then that's the interesting stuff for me. ANNETTA: Daniel, thank you so much for joining us tonight for conversations today. Please pass on our disappointment, but also understanding of why David couldn't be with us and we would have loved to have heard from him. But we'll do that another time. But it's been great chatting with you. And thank you for your time. DANIEL: I think it's been really enjoyable, hopefully I’ll speak to you again soon. ANALYSIS ANNETTA: Katrina, Daniel is always an incredibly interesting person to spend time with and interview, and I thoroughly enjoy spending time with Dan and this was an amazing interview. I think one of the things that is really exciting about what Daniel talks about is that he knows the topic, he’s in there all the time, you know, the whole conversation around bidding and why we bid and how we bid and what's the purpose of bidding. And if we lose a bid, what does that mean? Iit just fascinates me and, you know, all the strategy around bidding. And one of the things that always amazes me when Dan and I talk is when he talks about these people who actually their job is developing bids for these great big, huge events. I’d never thought of that as a job. And it always amazes me. KATRINA: That was a total eye-opener for me as well, because I always think about what happens after you get the bid, not necessarily all the work that goes into getting the bid. And so I was really intrigued to hear about that. And I was intrigued by Daniel himself. As someone who went to business school, when I think of people who run business schools, I think of this typical structured type person. Just to hear about Daniel's background, though, in arts and sports, the sort of non-traditional business background. I just love that. I love the contrast of that. It was just really, really refreshing. ANNETTA: Yeah. And really exciting. And I think one of the things that I really like about that, is the way that arts and festivals and major event management is acknowledged as business, as big business. And, you know, and we all complement each other. We're not, we're not standalone and we all work together really well. And I really, really liked it. And one of the things that I think has really helped sharpen my thinking around management is the way Daniel talks about bidding is sometimes strategic. It's not you don't necessarily need to win the bid. Sometimes it's about applying and getting some marketing off the bid that is important. So that strategy around bidding for something I think is fascinating. KATRINA: Yeah, I totally agree. And I recall during the interview Annetta you raised this point about soft power and how hosting these events can really kind of legitimize a country or give it a sense of itself. And Daniel talked about the story of Scotland and the 2014 Commonwealth Games and how the independence referendum followed. And it really just kind of defined a people and that really, you know, that political kind of soft power really resonated with me. I thought that was a really interesting way to think about this issue that goes beyond the economics. This show was created by Executive Producer and Host Annetta Latham; Co-host Katrina Ingram. Technical Producer Paul Johnston. Research Assistants involved were Caitlian McKinnon and MacEwan bachelor of music students. Theme Music by Emily Darfur and cover art by Constanza Pacher. Special thanks to the Rose Foundation for their support and to our guests. Artful Conversations is a production of MacEwan University [and Assistant Professor Annetta Latham], all rights reserved. Latham, A. (Executive Producer and Host). Regan-Ingram, K (Host). (2020, October 20) [Season 2: Episode 1]. Daniel Turner. Podcast retrieved from:
L’invité : Etienne Anheim, directeur d’études à l’EHESS et des éditions de l’EHESS Le livre : Norbert Elias, Moyen âge et procès de civilisation, traduction d’Anne-Marie Pailhès, Paris, Éditions de l’EHESS, 2021. La discussion : Une nouvelle collection de poche pour les sciences sociales aux éditions de l’EHESS (1’) Un texte inédit en français, ce qui s’inscrit dans … Continue reading "179. Le Moyen âge de Norbert Elias, avec Étienne Anheim"
What does the prevalence of violence in the Harry Potter series tell us about magical civilization - and our own? Despite its theme of nonviolence, there’s a fair amount of violence in the Harry Potter series. On this episode, Katy and Emily talk with Dr. Aurélie Lacassagne, Associate Professor of Political Science at Laurentian University - Sudbury, in Ontario, Canada. Aurélie explains how the Harry Potter novels, which have struck a resonant chord with readers worldwide, reveal important tensions in what scholar Norbert Elias called the “civilizing process.” As Aurélie notes, Elias connects “civilization” to self-restraint, interdependency, emotional control, and the taming of violence. However, he notes that “decivilizing” also occurs dynamically in all societies as social restraints are tested and emotions boil over. Although members of the Order of the Phoenix show empathy and try to restrain violence where possible, the Death Eaters conversely gain pleasure from torture and murder, without shame or disgust. Pure-bloods, a cohesive group who think of themselves as more established and rooted in tradition, embrace an exclusive notion of society, expressing fear and hatred of outsiders. These outsiders are deemed unworthy of social protection or empathy. Death Eater violence thus contributes to decivilizing forces in wizarding society. Most members of the wizarding community are engaged in the civilizing process, but fear can impel even non-Death Eaters - including members of the Ministry of Magic - to let loose their baser human tendencies. The Harry Potter series shows how difficult it is to constrain one’s emotions, not only for Death Eaters but for the good characters in the series like Harry, Ron, and Hermione. Civilizations create release valves for strong emotions to channel them productively (Quidditch!). So much of Dumbledore’s advice emphasizes the importance of finding a balance between expressing our feelings and following social restraints. We must express love and empathize with others, but also be capable of experiencing remorse, which we can see in Snape but not Tom Riddle. Remorse is vital for the civilizing process not only for the one who experiences remorse but also for the larger community, which can then extend forgiveness. Aurélie shares how our experience of decivilizing moments in our own history can reinforce the value of the “global survival unit” that recognizes the unity and value of all humanity, extending community protections to all. History and literature provide witnesses by adoption. Both the Harry Potter novels and the history of twentieth-century fascism engage our emotions, pointing to love, friendship, and empathy as the core values of human civilization. In our special segment, Emily and Katy discuss the scene in Prisoner of Azkaban where Hermione punches or slaps Draco in the face. Is this decivilizing violence? How do we feel about this moment of unrestrained aggression?
In this episode we are joined by Neil Gong. Neil is an assistant professor of sociology at UC San Diego, a member of the Michigan Society of Fellows, and winner of the 2020 American Sociological Association’s Junior Theorist of the Year award. In our conversation, Neil introduces the work of Norbert Elias, reflects on both […]
In this bonus episode, the Histories of the Unexpected duo, James and Sam, once again clear their throats and continue to spitball about the unexpected history of SALIVA! Which is all about all about civilisation, politeness and Norbert Elias, chewing tobacco, tuberculosis, truth-telling, protecting from evil, women’s political movements, Charles Dickens and childhood beliefs and superstitions.! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
In this bonus episode, the Histories of the Unexpected duo, James and Sam, once again clear their throats and continue to spitball about the unexpected history of SALIVA! Which is all about all about civilisation, politeness and Norbert Elias, chewing tobacco, tuberculosis, truth-telling, protecting from evil, women’s political movements, Charles Dickens and childhood beliefs and superstitions.! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
In this episode, the Histories of the Unexpected duo, James and Sam, clear their throats and spitball on the unexpected history of SALIVA! Which is all about all about civilisation, politeness and Norbert Elias, chewing tobacco, tuberculosis, truth-telling, protecting from evil, women’s political movements, Charles Dickens and childhood beliefs and superstitions.! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
In this episode, the Histories of the Unexpected duo, James and Sam, clear their throats and spitball on the unexpected history of SALIVA! Which is all about all about civilisation, politeness and Norbert Elias, chewing tobacco, tuberculosis, truth-telling, protecting from evil, women’s political movements, Charles Dickens and childhood beliefs and superstitions.! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Neste episódio do Historicidade, o programa de entrevistas do Fronteiras no Tempo, conversamos com o Professor Doutor Deivy Ferreira Carneiro (UFU), sobre as ofensas verbais e os conflitos na História. O ato de ofender alguém com palavras ou xingamentos sempre esteve presente na atuação da justiça criminal, e hoje, por meio dos documentos produzidos na repressão a esses crimes, podemos entender o que significava esta ação, os conflitos que desencadeava e, ainda, vários outros aspectos da história cotidiana das sociedades passadas. Nesta entrevista: Entenda como o historiador trabalha com as fontes da justiça criminal e quais são os caminhos para compreender os conflitos e ofensas verbais naqueles documentos. Conheça os tipos de xingamentos estudados e porque alguns ofendiam mais do que outros. Surpreenda-se com a relevância que um ataque verbal poderia ter no início e/ou no desenrolar de um conflito e, ainda, saiba por que se fazia questão de que fossem punidos os que cometiam este delito. Por fim, reflita conosco sobre o papel da justiça criminal no contexto social e político brasileiro do século XIX e XX e em como a atuação dos seus agentes, em interação com a sociedade, ajudaram a conformar formas de comportamentos e valores. Arte da Capa Publicidade Ajude nosso projeto! Você pode nos apoiar de duas formas: PADRIM – só clicar e se cadastrar (bem rápido e prático) PIC PAY – Baixe o aplicativo do PicPay: iOS / Android Saiba mais do nosso convidado Deivy Ferreira Carneiro Currículo Lattes Produção do convidado CARNEIRO, Deivy F. A Microstoria italiana e os desafios biográficos na historiografia recente (1980-2000). Locus: Revista de História, v. 26, p. 211-234, 2020. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Norbert Elias e a história da violência no Brasil. ArtCultura_Revista de História, Cultura e Arte Uberlândia, v. 19, p. 189-206, 2017. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Micro-história e uma análise da relação entre a população e a justiça criminal. In: Maíra Vendrame e Alexandre Karsburg. (Org.). Micro-história: um método em transformação. 1ed.São Paulo: Letra e Voz, 2020, v. 1, p. 309-336. CARNEIRO, Deivy F. Microanalise e o Leviata: uma homenagem a Antonio Manuel Hespanha.. In: Diego Nunes; Gustavo Ferreira Santos; Jonatan de Jesus Oliveira. (Org.). Linhas Juridicas do Triangulo: estudos em homenagem ao Professor Antonio Manuel Hespanha.. 1ed.Uberlândia: LAECC, 2020, v. 1, p. 37-57. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Bares, jogatinas e cultura popular na Zona da Mata mineira (1854-19410. In: Cleber Dias; Maria Cristina Rosa. (Org.). História do Lazer nas Gerais. 1ed.Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG, 2019, v. 1, p. 113-136. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Micro-História, História do Crime e da justiça Criminal: um diálogo possível e desejado. In: Maíra I. Vendrame; Cláudia Mauch; Paulo Roberto S. Moreira. (Org.). Crime e Justiça: reflexões, fontes e possibilidades de pesquisa. 1ed.São Leopoldo: Editora da Unisinos, 2018, p. 33-66. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Os usos da biografia pela micro-história italiana: interdependência, biografias coletivas e network analysis. In: Alexandre de Sá Avelar; Benito Bisso Schmidt. (Org.). O que pode a Biografia. 1ed.São Paulo: Letra e Voz, 2018, v. 1, p. 33-58. CARNEIRO, Deivy F.. Apontamentos para uma História Eliasiana da violência no Brasil. In: Célia Nonata Silva; Francisco Linhares Fonteles Neto. (Org.). Discere criminum: crime, violência e poder – uma abordagem nacional. 1ed. Maceió: Imprensa Oficial Graciliano Ramos, 2017, v. , p. 111-144. CARNEIRO, Deivy F. Uma Justiça que seduz? Ofensas verbais e conflitos comunitários em Minas Gerais (1854-1941). 1. ed. Jundiaí: Paco Editorial, 2019. v. 1. 368p . CARNEIRO, Deivy F.; Bretas, Marcos Luiz ; Rosemberg, André . História, violência e criminalidade: reflexões temáticas e narrativas regionais. 1. ed. Uberlândia: Edufu, 2015. v. 1. 332p Indicações bibliográficas sobre o tema abordado GARRIOCH, David. Insultos verbais na Paris do século XVIII. In: BURKE, Peter & PORTER, Roy. História social da linguagem. São Paulo: Edunesp, 1997, p. 121. FLYNN, Charles. Insult and society: patterns of comparative interaction. Port Washington / New York: Kennikat Press. 1977, p. 3-6. LEACH, Edmund. “Aspectos antropológicos da linguagem: categorias animais e insulto verbal”. In: DA MATTA, Roberto (org). Edmund Leach. Coleção grandes cientistas sociais. São Paulo: Ática, 1983, p. 170-98. BURKE, Peter. “L'art de l'insulte en Italie aux XVie et XVIIe siècles”. In: DELUMEAU, Jean. Injuries et Blasphemes. Mentalites: Histoire dês cultures et dês sociétés. Vol. 2. Éditions Imago, 1989 PITT-RIVERS, Julian. “Honra e posição social”. In: PERISTIANY, J. G. Honra e Vergonha: valores das sociedades mediterrânicas. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, s/d. WADDAMS, S. M. Sexual Slander in 19th century England: defamation in the ecclesiastical courts. 1815-1855. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000. SHOEMAKER, Robert. “The Decline of Public Insult in London 1660-1800”. Past & Present, n.169, November, 2000, p. 97-131. Expediente Arte da vitrine: Augusto Carvalho; Edição: Talk'nCast; Roteiro e apresentação: Beraba. Como citar esse episódio Citação ABNT Fronteiras no Tempo: Historicidade #34 Ofensas verbais e conflitos na história. Locução Marcelo de Souza Silva, Deivy Ferreira Carneiro. [S.l.] Portal Deviante, 20/10/2020. Podcast. Disponível: http://www.deviante.com.br/?p=41201&preview=true Redes Sociais Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Instagram, SPOTIFY, Contato E-mail: fronteirasnotempo@gmail.com Madrinhas e Padrinhos Alexandre Strapação Guedes Vianna, Alexsandro de Souza Junior, Aline Lima, Anderson O Garcia, Anderson Paz, André Luis Santos, Andre Trapani Costa Possignolo, Andréa Silva, Andressa Marcelino Cardoso, Artur Henrique de Andrade Cornejo, Bruno Scomparin, Carlos Alberto de Souza Palmezani, Carlos Alberto Jr., Carolina Pereira Lyon, Ceará, Cláudia Bovo, Eani Marculino de Moura, Eduardo Saavedra Losada Lopes, Elisnei Oliveira, Ettore Riter, Felipe Augusto Roza, Felipe Sousa Santana, Flavio Henrique Dias Saldanha, Iago Mardones, Iara Grisi, Isaura Helena, João Carlos Ariedi Filho, José Carlos dos Santos, Leticia Duarte Hartmann, Lucas Akel, Luciano Beraba, Manuel Macias, Marcos Sorrilha, Mayara Araujo dos Reis, Mayara Sanches, Moises Antiqueira, Paulo Henrique de Nunzio, Rafael, Rafael Alves de Oliveira, Rafael Igino Serafim, Rafael Machado Saldanha, Rafael Zipão, Raphael Almeida, Raphael Bruno Silva Oliveira, Renata Sanches, Rodrigo Raupp, Rodrigo Vieira Pimentel, Rubens Lima, Sr. Pinto, Wagner de Andrade Alves, Willian Scaquett, Willian Spengler e ao padrinho anônimoSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Dass der Prozess der Zivilisation das Schwert zum Tafelsilber werden lässt, weiß man spätestens seit Norbert Elias. Dass aber ein möglichst spätes Abendessen ebenfalls als Zeichen einer besonders hohen Kulturstufe gesehen werden müsse, ist wohl doch eher ein folgenreiches Missverständnis. Die Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung vom 10. Oktober 1920 jedenfalls sieht die Pariser Mode, die Tischzeit immer tiefer in die Nacht zu schieben, jedenfalls als eine auch den englischen Arbeitsrhythmen, dem neuen Lifestyle zu verdankende fatale Entwicklung. Tatsächlich brauche es heutzutage Amerikaner, Yankees, um diese Absurdität als das zu verstehen, was sie ist: Kulturverfall, kein zivilisatorischer Fortschritt. Gelesen von Paula Leu.
Acá algunos fragmentos Sobre el tiempo de Norbert Elias. El tiempo no es natural ni meramente físico: es lo que pasa entre dos acontecimientos que el ser humano identifica como significativos. La vivencia del tiempo nunca es pura, siempre es social, siempre coordina, siempre integra. El tiempo es una fuerza coactiva que el grupo impone al individuo. El tiempo nos condiciona para que podamos vivir en sociedad: crea y fija rutinas, horarios, rituales, ciclos que en nuestra existencia serán como normales dentro de marcos de referencia diferenciados, es decir, útiles, orientados a cumplir una acción social. Se vuelve más estricto el mando de los relojes cuanto más dependemos de lxs otrxs. La aceleración no significa ir más rápido en esencia. Vamos más rápido porque estamos más ocupadxs, porque nos cruzan más secuencias, porque estas forman parte de la reproducción diaria y a largo plazo de la vida individual y de la humanidad. En otras palabras, estar aceleradx es ser más productivo, tener menos tiempo para “unx mismx”. Por eso parece que el tiempo no nos pertenece: se lo debemos (casi) todo a la sociedad. La sociedad es un cristal de pautas de tiempo. Y estas son todo menos eternas, Galileo. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/anarkademia/message
Como que controlamos nossos impulsos? E por que motivo o fazemos? Neste programa, trazemos as ideias de Elias e sua discussão sobre o processo civilizador!
En cuisine, on parle beaucoup d’odeur, de goût, de visuel, mais jamais de son. Cet épisode est là pour réparer cette injustice ! Craquements, gargouillis, effritements, bruits de bouche de l’autre mais aussi de soi-même, voilà autant de madeleines sonores qui confèrent à la cuisine une musicalité particulière. Dans ce live enregistré durant le Paris Podcast Festival en octobre 2019 à la Gaîté Lyrique, Émilie (doctorat en bruitages alimentaires sous le bras) sera accompagnée par Adeline Gobin, cheffe pâtissière du restaurant An Di An Di afin de parler du rôle de la texture dans la pâtisserie ainsi que des différences entre croquant, craquant et croustillant. En deuxième partie, vous entendrez Valentin Dasse, ancien chercheur en sociologie et spécialiste de l’ASMR. Ensemble, ils discutent des vertus de ce sens dont on parle si peu en cuisine : l’ouïe. Références entendues dans l’épisode : Le restaurant An Di An Di d’Adeline Gobin est situé au 9 rue du Liban, 75020 ParisLa thèse de Valentin Dasse à l’EHESS s’intitule “De l’orgasme cérébral au dégout : une analyse des expériences spectatorielles des vidéos ASMR à la lumière de la sociologie du corps et des émotions.”La pavlova est un dessert à base de meringue et de crème fouettéeLe craquelin est un gâteau très sec et craquant, préparé avec de la pâte à biscuit ou à échaudé.Le tapioca ou perle du Japon est une fécule extraite de la racine de manioc.Le bubble tea ou thé aux perles est une boisson taÏwanaise mélangeant thé, lait et boules noires de tapioca. Le mukbang est une tendance venue de Corée du Sud qui consiste à se filmer en train de manger. La cuisson extrusion est un procédé qui permet d’obtenir des aliments croustillants.L’ASMR (pour Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response) est un genre de vidéo à visée relaxante reposant sur des sons minimalistes. Catherine Dacremont est enseignante-chercheuse en évaluation sensorielle. Charles Spence est professeur de psychologie expérimentale à l’université de Oxford. Il montre à quel point la nourriture ne se résume pas seulement au goût. Julien Bernard est maître conférencier à l’Université Paris Nanterre et directeur adjoint de son département de sociologie. Il a écrit sur le corps et les émotions. Norbert Elias, La civilisation des moeurs, 1939. Keemi est une youtubeuse coréenne. Virginie Amilien est professeure à l’Institut national de recherche sur la consommation en Norvège. Pour aller plus loin : Charles Spence sur la gastrophysique et la neurogastronomie. Runar Døving sur la différence norvégienne entre croquant, craquant et croustillant.Le blog de la nutritionniste Karine Gravel L’effet de l’ASMR sur le cerveauRaphaël Haumont sur le lien entre saveur et textureBouffons est une émission de Nouvelles Écoutes, portée par Émilie Laystary. Montée et mixée par Thomas Decourt. Programmation par Cassandra de Carvalho. Et coordination par Laura Cuissard avec l’aide de Mathilde Vinet.
Disability, gender and sexuality, politics of public space, and intersectional accessibility. Some enchanted conference, across a crowded plate of beans at Sheffield Hallam University, Dr. Charlotte Jones and Dr. Jen Slater discovered a shared passion for poop. One year later, “Around the Toilet” was born, performing collaborative arts-based research on bathrooms as places of inclusion and/or exclusion. Shawn Shafner (The Puru) sits down with the dynamic doo-o to discuss how restrooms can become inaccessible because of age, gender, ability, religion, profession and more, plus the online tools, videos, and corrugated cardboard water closets they created to entice designers towards innovation. Pushing past the "one-stall-fits-all" model, we imagine a compassionate world where every deuce can be dropped with dignity. Also mentioned in this episode: Edinburgh Scotland, Sex Drugs and Activism, PrEP (Pre Exposure Prophylaxis), sex categories, gender binary, disability studies, Alison Kafer, Feminist Queer Crip, overlapping identities, oppression, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Norbert Elias, Civilizing Process, Changing Places, Barbara Penner, bladder leash, Victorian toilets, toilet tourism, London Loo Tours, Broadway theater, muslim, truckers lorry drivers, NYU Bobst Library.
The very first episode of Conciencia Colectiva!
Taboo-breaking comedy, toilet knives, wiping stones and Jewish perspectives on poop. Celebrities are just like us! Director Aaron Feldman’s new film POOP TALK finally proves it, as Kumail Nanjiani, Eric Stonestreet, Dr. Drew and more divulge the contents of their colons. In this hour with Shawn Shafner (The Puru), Feldman explains how his own sensitive stomach inspired the film, why colon cancer specialists are praising its creation, and how a silly film about poop might also be a profound meditation on our common humanity. Finally, Mama Feldman has reason to be proud. Also mentioned: Sustainability, taboo, comedians as anthropologists, relationships, dating, handling discomfort, Sklar Brothers, Sammi Edelson, Dr. Drew Pinsky, Adam Carolla, Paul Provenza, Penn & Teller, Jewish geography, summer camp, Ramah Conover Wisconsin, Comedy Dynamics, Sephardim, Ashkenazi, chulent, taboo hinders research, Alexander Kira, Reginald Reynolds, Cleanliness and Godliness, Norbert Elias, David Inglis, Microbiome, Stercurius, Seedbed: Soil Symposium UCSC, Confronting Vulnerability: The Body and the Divine in Rabbinic Ethics by Jonathan Wyn Schofer, Gemara, David Walter Taos, Origin of the Feces, Milorganite, Milwaukee, SOIL, Sasha Kramer, container based sanitation, Bill Gates
The work of sociologist Norbert Elias has had a renaissance in recent times, with Steven Pinker, among others, using it to argue that interpersonal violence has declined globally as states have expanded and subdued restless populations. In Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia (Cambridge University Press, 2015), Roderic Broadhurst and his co-authors Thierry and Brigette Bouhours bring the declinist thesis to Southeast Asia. Coupling Elias's approach with criminological theory, Broadhurst and the Bouhours argue that Cambodia's experience over a 150 years is broadly consistent with what Elias found in Europe: that by monopolising force, generating chains of interdependence, and sensitising people to violence, states have an overall civilising effect. This is a startling and counterintuitive finding for a country whose name was not so long ago synonymous with genocide. But, Broadhurst and co-authors explain, the civilizing process is not linear. Asia like Europe has had its decivilising periods, and it might yet have some more. The overall trend, nevertheless, is away from violence and towards civility. Roderic Broadhurst joins New Books in Southeast Asian Studies to talk about state violence versus interpersonal violence, French colonial administration, postcolonialism and modernity, Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge, Hun Sen and authoritarianism, and the challenges of doing historical sociology across multiple regime types and periods. You may also be interested in: Astrid Noren-Nilsson, Cambodia's Second Kingdom: Nation, Imagination, and Democracy Abram de Swaan, The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder Nick Cheesman is a fellow at the College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University. He can be reached at nick.cheesman@anu.edu.au.
The work of sociologist Norbert Elias has had a renaissance in recent times, with Steven Pinker, among others, using it to argue that interpersonal violence has declined globally as states have expanded and subdued restless populations. In Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia (Cambridge University Press, 2015), Roderic Broadhurst and his co-authors Thierry and Brigette Bouhours bring the declinist thesis to Southeast Asia. Coupling Elias’s approach with criminological theory, Broadhurst and the Bouhours argue that Cambodia’s experience over a 150 years is broadly consistent with what Elias found in Europe: that by monopolising force, generating chains of interdependence, and sensitising people to violence, states have an overall civilising effect. This is a startling and counterintuitive finding for a country whose name was not so long ago synonymous with genocide. But, Broadhurst and co-authors explain, the civilizing process is not linear. Asia like Europe has had its decivilising periods, and it might yet have some more. The overall trend, nevertheless, is away from violence and towards civility. Roderic Broadhurst joins New Books in Southeast Asian Studies to talk about state violence versus interpersonal violence, French colonial administration, postcolonialism and modernity, Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge, Hun Sen and authoritarianism, and the challenges of doing historical sociology across multiple regime types and periods. You may also be interested in: Astrid Noren-Nilsson, Cambodia’s Second Kingdom: Nation, Imagination, and Democracy Abram de Swaan, The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder Nick Cheesman is a fellow at the College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University. He can be reached at nick.cheesman@anu.edu.au. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The work of sociologist Norbert Elias has had a renaissance in recent times, with Steven Pinker, among others, using it to argue that interpersonal violence has declined globally as states have expanded and subdued restless populations. In Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia (Cambridge University Press, 2015), Roderic Broadhurst and his co-authors Thierry and Brigette Bouhours bring the declinist thesis to Southeast Asia. Coupling Elias’s approach with criminological theory, Broadhurst and the Bouhours argue that Cambodia’s experience over a 150 years is broadly consistent with what Elias found in Europe: that by monopolising force, generating chains of interdependence, and sensitising people to violence, states have an overall civilising effect. This is a startling and counterintuitive finding for a country whose name was not so long ago synonymous with genocide. But, Broadhurst and co-authors explain, the civilizing process is not linear. Asia like Europe has had its decivilising periods, and it might yet have some more. The overall trend, nevertheless, is away from violence and towards civility. Roderic Broadhurst joins New Books in Southeast Asian Studies to talk about state violence versus interpersonal violence, French colonial administration, postcolonialism and modernity, Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge, Hun Sen and authoritarianism, and the challenges of doing historical sociology across multiple regime types and periods. You may also be interested in: Astrid Noren-Nilsson, Cambodia’s Second Kingdom: Nation, Imagination, and Democracy Abram de Swaan, The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder Nick Cheesman is a fellow at the College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University. He can be reached at nick.cheesman@anu.edu.au. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The work of sociologist Norbert Elias has had a renaissance in recent times, with Steven Pinker, among others, using it to argue that interpersonal violence has declined globally as states have expanded and subdued restless populations. In Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia (Cambridge University Press, 2015), Roderic Broadhurst and his co-authors Thierry and Brigette Bouhours bring the declinist thesis to Southeast Asia. Coupling Elias’s approach with criminological theory, Broadhurst and the Bouhours argue that Cambodia’s experience over a 150 years is broadly consistent with what Elias found in Europe: that by monopolising force, generating chains of interdependence, and sensitising people to violence, states have an overall civilising effect. This is a startling and counterintuitive finding for a country whose name was not so long ago synonymous with genocide. But, Broadhurst and co-authors explain, the civilizing process is not linear. Asia like Europe has had its decivilising periods, and it might yet have some more. The overall trend, nevertheless, is away from violence and towards civility. Roderic Broadhurst joins New Books in Southeast Asian Studies to talk about state violence versus interpersonal violence, French colonial administration, postcolonialism and modernity, Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge, Hun Sen and authoritarianism, and the challenges of doing historical sociology across multiple regime types and periods. You may also be interested in: Astrid Noren-Nilsson, Cambodia’s Second Kingdom: Nation, Imagination, and Democracy Abram de Swaan, The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder Nick Cheesman is a fellow at the College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University. He can be reached at nick.cheesman@anu.edu.au. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The work of sociologist Norbert Elias has had a renaissance in recent times, with Steven Pinker, among others, using it to argue that interpersonal violence has declined globally as states have expanded and subdued restless populations. In Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia (Cambridge University Press, 2015), Roderic Broadhurst and his co-authors Thierry and Brigette Bouhours bring the declinist thesis to Southeast Asia. Coupling Elias’s approach with criminological theory, Broadhurst and the Bouhours argue that Cambodia’s experience over a 150 years is broadly consistent with what Elias found in Europe: that by monopolising force, generating chains of interdependence, and sensitising people to violence, states have an overall civilising effect. This is a startling and counterintuitive finding for a country whose name was not so long ago synonymous with genocide. But, Broadhurst and co-authors explain, the civilizing process is not linear. Asia like Europe has had its decivilising periods, and it might yet have some more. The overall trend, nevertheless, is away from violence and towards civility. Roderic Broadhurst joins New Books in Southeast Asian Studies to talk about state violence versus interpersonal violence, French colonial administration, postcolonialism and modernity, Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge, Hun Sen and authoritarianism, and the challenges of doing historical sociology across multiple regime types and periods. You may also be interested in: Astrid Noren-Nilsson, Cambodia’s Second Kingdom: Nation, Imagination, and Democracy Abram de Swaan, The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder Nick Cheesman is a fellow at the College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University. He can be reached at nick.cheesman@anu.edu.au. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The work of sociologist Norbert Elias has had a renaissance in recent times, with Steven Pinker, among others, using it to argue that interpersonal violence has declined globally as states have expanded and subdued restless populations. In Violence and the Civilising Process in Cambodia (Cambridge University Press, 2015), Roderic Broadhurst and his co-authors Thierry and Brigette Bouhours bring the declinist thesis to Southeast Asia. Coupling Elias’s approach with criminological theory, Broadhurst and the Bouhours argue that Cambodia’s experience over a 150 years is broadly consistent with what Elias found in Europe: that by monopolising force, generating chains of interdependence, and sensitising people to violence, states have an overall civilising effect. This is a startling and counterintuitive finding for a country whose name was not so long ago synonymous with genocide. But, Broadhurst and co-authors explain, the civilizing process is not linear. Asia like Europe has had its decivilising periods, and it might yet have some more. The overall trend, nevertheless, is away from violence and towards civility. Roderic Broadhurst joins New Books in Southeast Asian Studies to talk about state violence versus interpersonal violence, French colonial administration, postcolonialism and modernity, Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge, Hun Sen and authoritarianism, and the challenges of doing historical sociology across multiple regime types and periods. You may also be interested in: Astrid Noren-Nilsson, Cambodia’s Second Kingdom: Nation, Imagination, and Democracy Abram de Swaan, The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder Nick Cheesman is a fellow at the College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University. He can be reached at nick.cheesman@anu.edu.au. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society: Audio Fishbowl
Social and communication theorists Nick Couldry and Andreas Hepp draw on their recent book "The Mediated Construction of Reality" (Polity 2016) to explore what happens to the concept and practice of 'social order' in the era of datafication. Today we are living in an era not just of mediatization, but deep mediatization where every element of social process and social life is composed of elements that have already been mediated. This shifts the question of media's 'influence' on the social into a higher-dimensional problem. Datafication is a good example of this, and its tension with classical forms of social phenomenology will be discussed in detail in the talk. Developing particularly the social theory of Norbert Elias (and his concept of 'figuration'), Couldry and Hepp explore how social theory can help us grasp the deep conflicts that exist today between our material systems of interdependence (particularly those focussed on information technology and data processing systems) and the normative principles such as freedom and autonomy. Such conflicts as legal theorists such as Julie Cohen note are crucial to the life of democratic subjects and the orders (democratic or not) that they inhabit. For more info on this event visit: https://cyber.harvard.edu/events/2017/10/CouldryHepp
Nick Couldry outlined the project of his recent book, The Mediated Construction of Reality (Polity October 2016, co-written with Andreas Hepp). The book offers a critical reevaluation and rearticulation of the social constructivist ambitions of Berger and Luckmann’s 1966 book The Social Construction of Reality while radically rethinking the implications of this for a world saturated not just with digital media, but with data processes. Couldry outlined how a materialist phenomenology can draw not just on traditional phenomenology, but on the social theory of Norbert Elias, particularly his concept of figurations, to address the challenges of social analysis in the face of datafication. Elias, Couldry argued, is a particularly important theorist on whom to draw in making social constructivism ready to face the deep embedding of the social world with digital technologies, and more than that, to outline the challenges for social order of such a world. More broadly, Couldry argued for a reengagement of media theory with the broader tradition of social theory in the era of Big Data, in the face of a radical expansion of what media are and how mediation is embedded in everyday social orders. Nick Couldry is a sociologist of media and culture. He is Professor of Media Communications and Social Theory at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He is currently a Visiting Researcher at Microsoft Research Lab, and during 2017-2018 a Faculty Associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University. He is the author or editor of twelve books including most recently The Mediated Construction of Reality (with Andreas Hepp, Polity, 2016), Ethics of Media (2013 Palgrave, coedited with Mirca Madianou and Amit Pinchevski), Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice (Polity 2012) and Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism (Sage 2010).
Au sommaire de ce numéro : Introduction (00m00s – 1m40s)Coup de projecteur : Tout le monde sont rôlistes (1m41s – 7m08s)Critique : Zombie Porn (7m09s – 45m09s)Dossier : La violence physique dans le JdR (45m10s – 1h20m40s)Critique : Happy & Happy Together (1h20m41s – 1h43m37s)Nos coups de cœur du moment (1hm43m38s – 1h48m10s)Les jeux et les sites mentionnés dans ce numéro :Romance érotiquePlenilunioWarhammer 40kLe documentaire Il n'y a pas de rapport sexuelLa bande dessinée La Fabrique pornographiqueMy Life With MasterFall of MagicNorwegian StyleUntil We SinkL'article de Norbert Elias sur violence et sportL'article du Monde sur la violence dans le jeu vidéoL'article de Zak Smith sur la violenceUnknown ArmiesFriponnes RPGBeyond the WallShadeChannel FearSombre 7Veins of the EarthLe GN Rêves d'Absinthe
Au sommaire de ce numéro : Introduction (00m00s – 1m40s)Coup de projecteur : Tout le monde sont rôlistes (1m41s – 7m08s)Critique : Zombie Porn (7m09s – 45m09s)Dossier : La violence physique dans le JdR (45m10s – 1h20m40s)Critique : Happy & Happy Together (1h20m41s – 1h43m37s)Nos coups de cœur du moment (1hm43m38s – 1h48m10s)Les jeux et les sites mentionnés dans ce numéro :Romance érotiquePlenilunioWarhammer 40kLe documentaire Il n'y a pas de rapport sexuelLa bande dessinée La Fabrique pornographiqueMy Life With MasterFall of MagicNorwegian StyleUntil We SinkL'article de Norbert Elias sur violence et sportL'article du Monde sur la violence dans le jeu vidéoL'article de Zak Smith sur la violenceUnknown ArmiesFriponnes RPGBeyond the WallShadeChannel FearSombre 7Veins of the EarthLe GN Rêves d'Absinthe
Au sommaire de ce numéro : Introduction (00m00s – 1m40s)Coup de projecteur : Tout le monde sont rôlistes (1m41s – 7m08s)Critique : Zombie Porn (7m09s – 45m09s)Dossier : La violence physique dans le JdR (45m10s – 1h20m40s)Critique : Happy & Happy Together (1h20m41s – 1h43m37s)Nos coups de cœur du moment (1hm43m38s – 1h48m10s)Les jeux et les sites mentionnés dans ce numéro :Romance érotiquePlenilunioWarhammer 40kLe documentaire Il n’y a pas de rapport sexuelLa bande dessinée La Fabrique pornographiqueMy Life With MasterFall of MagicNorwegian StyleUntil We SinkL’article de Norbert Elias sur violence et sportL’article du Monde sur la violence dans le jeu vidéoL’article de Zak Smith sur la violenceUnknown ArmiesFriponnes RPGBeyond the WallShadeChannel FearSombre 7Veins of the EarthLe GN Rêves d’Absinthe
这是《得意忘形》播客的第 16 期节目。这期节目从英国莱斯特大学飞来了一名热心听众,与我探讨了一些关于社会学的话题,以及他的精神导师 Norbert Elias。并且涉及了一点点关于,为什么社会学也是心理学也是生物学也是哲学的内容。本期节目里你可以听到:* 社会学是什么?* 社会学界的「哥白尼」Norbert Elias(埃利亚斯)的文明化理论是什么?* Norbert Elias与英国莱斯特大学社会学系有什么故事?* 个体是如何受到自身所处的社会的影响的?* 人与人之间的优越感是如何产生的?* 为什么社会是一个动态的,非理性的,未经计划的过程?本期延伸阅读:(链接版:https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/26803968/)* 学术散文:《故事里的社会学》* 《文明的进程》* 《个体的社会》* 《The Established and the Outsiders》* 德国社会学家 Jürgen Habermas(哈贝马斯):以沟通行动理论著名,提倡以理性沟通的方式获得个人的解放本期嘉宾:* 喻恺东:英国莱斯特社会学在读硕士研究生。着迷于 Norbert Elias 的社会学理论,乐于传播他的思想。个人微信公众号:听说东语音乐:* 静默蹉跎 by 何天程(喻恺东好友)播客简介:《得意忘形》是一个主张追求个体自由与探寻真理的媒体计划。我们见证了第一次工业gm以来科技对人类社会的极大推动与助益,但也意识到资本主义与市场经济不可避免地催生了消费文化、剥夺了个人价值、并窃取了大众时间。带着对生命的有限性与无目的性的敬畏,我们试图为读者与听众提供更全面的觉察自我与认知世界的工具,以不断重建当下的方式穿越时间、抵达生活的本质。
这是《得意忘形》播客的第 16 期节目。这期节目从英国莱斯特大学飞来了一名热心听众,与我探讨了一些关于社会学的话题,以及他的精神导师 Norbert Elias。并且涉及了一点点关于,为什么社会学也是心理学也是生物学也是哲学的内容。本期节目里你可以听到:* 社会学是什么?* 社会学界的「哥白尼」Norbert Elias(埃利亚斯)的文明化理论是什么?* Norbert Elias与英国莱斯特大学社会学系有什么故事?* 个体是如何受到自身所处的社会的影响的?* 人与人之间的优越感是如何产生的?* 为什么社会是一个动态的,非理性的,未经计划的过程?本期延伸阅读:(链接版:https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/26803968/)* 学术散文:《故事里的社会学》* 《文明的进程》* 《个体的社会》* 《The Established and the Outsiders》* 德国社会学家 Jürgen Habermas(哈贝马斯):以沟通行动理论著名,提倡以理性沟通的方式获得个人的解放本期嘉宾:* 喻恺东:英国莱斯特社会学在读硕士研究生。着迷于 Norbert Elias 的社会学理论,乐于传播他的思想。个人微信公众号:听说东语音乐:* 静默蹉跎 by 何天程(喻恺东好友)播客简介:《得意忘形》是一个主张追求个体自由与探寻真理的媒体计划。我们见证了第一次工业gm以来科技对人类社会的极大推动与助益,但也意识到资本主义与市场经济不可避免地催生了消费文化、剥夺了个人价值、并窃取了大众时间。带着对生命的有限性与无目的性的敬畏,我们试图为读者与听众提供更全面的觉察自我与认知世界的工具,以不断重建当下的方式穿越时间、抵达生活的本质。
MP3-DOWNLOAD (00:58 h) 0:00 Intro 0:36 Historische Monsterarchitekturen 19:49 Monster der Woche: Das nordkoreanische Einhorn 35:13 Thema der Woche: Kleine Soziologie der Angst 43:15 Norbert Elias über die Angst 55:41 Letzte Worte aus der Gruft… Mehr
Dr. Jochen Schwenk, vom Institut für Soziologie der Technischen-Universität Darmstadt, unterhält sich mit Dr. Udo Thiedeke über die irritierende Realität des Staates und unsere Erwartungen und Befürchtungen in Hinblick auf staatliches Handeln und staatliche Ordnung. Shownotes: #00:03:30## Zum Konzept des Habitus bei Pierre Bourdieu vgl. Pierre Bourdieu, 2012: Sur l’État. Cours au Collège de France 1989-1992. Paris: Seuil. #00:07:28## Den Begriff der "Kulturnation", der vom Bildungsbürgertum im 19. Jhr. für Deutschland in Anspruch genommen wurde, unterschied der Historiker Friedrich Meinecke von dem der "Staatsnation". Siehe: Friedrich Meinecke, 1962: Weltbürgertum und Nationalstaat. Werkausgabe, Bd. 5. Stuttgart: R. Oldenbourg. [1908] #00:08:50## Zur Problematik Deutschlands als "verspätete Nation" siehe: Helmut Plessner, 1959: Die verspätete Nation. Über die politische Verführbarkeit bürgerlichen Geistes. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. #00:15:50## Bei dem Hinweis auf "bringing the state back in" handelt es sich um ein 1985 publizierten Sammelband. Der Anlass für diesen Band lieferte die Wiederkehr des Staates als Konzeptbegriff nachdem zuvor, so die Beobachtung der Autorinnen und Autoren, der Staat in den Sozialwissenschaften erstaunlich wenig Beachtung gefunden hatte. Besonders lesenswert in diesem Zusammenhang: Tilly, Charles, 1985, War Making and State Making as Organized Crime, in: Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Theda Skocpol, 1985: Bringing the state back in. New York: Cambridge University Press, S. 169-191. #00:16:13## Konkret setzt sich Hermann Heller mit dem Problem staatlicher Gewaltausübung auseinander und hält in seiner "Staatslehre" fest: "Eine Militärgewalt, die sich nicht der Aufgabe unterordnet, das gebietsgesellschaftliche Zusammenwirken zu organisieren und zu aktivieren, ist nur als Räuberbande zu denken." (1983: 236) Hermann Heller, 1983: Staatslehre. 6. Aufl. Tübingen: Mohr. [1934]. Provokativ zugespitzt vergleicht Tilly (ebd.) in einem ähnlichen Sinne Staaten mit einer Erbresserbande. Staaten seien „quintessential protection rackets with the advantage of legitimicy" (161). #00:17:50## Im Rahmen seiner Studien zu ‚Gesellschaften gegen den Staat‘ hat Pierre Clastres sich auch mit dem Häuptlingstum beschäftigt. An Hand seines ethnographischen Materials konnte er zeigen, dass die ‚Gesellschaften gegen den Staat‘ die Staatslosigkeit dadurch auf Dauer stellen, dass sie eine reale Abspaltung der politischen Macht von der Gesellschaft verhindern. Dem Häuptling kommt dabei die Aufgabe zu, die politische Macht der Gesellschaft zu repräsentieren, während im selben Zuge alle reziproken Tauschbeziehungen zu ihm abgebrochen werden. Übrig bleibt ein Häuptling, der Mangels Möglichkeiten, auf die Gesellschaft einzuwirken, letztlich machtlos bleibt. Es handelt sich also um eine zugleich symbolische wie folgenlose Besetzung der Stelle der Macht, wodurch die reale politische Macht im Schoß der Gesellschaft verbleibt. Vgl. Pierre Clastres, 2011: Échange et Pouvoir: Philosophie de la Chefferie Indienne, in: ders.: La Société contre l’État. Paris: Les Édition Minuit, S. 25-42 [1974], sowie: ders.,1980, La question du pouvoir dans les sociétés primitives, 103-109. In: ders.: Recherches d’anthropologie politique. Paris: Seuil. Grundsätzlich zu staatenlosen Gesellschaften vgl.: Christian Sigrist, 2005: Regulierte Anarchie. Untersuchungen zum Fehlen und zur Entstehung politischer Herrschaft in segmentären Gesellschaften Afrikas. LIT: Münster; Georg Balandier, 1974: Politische Anthropologie. München: dtv sowie James C. Scott, 2009: The Art of not being Governed. An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. #00:19:00## Zur Funktionsweise der Gabe vgl. Marcel Mauss, 1990: Die Gabe. Form und Funktion des Austauschs in archaischen Gesellschaften, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. #00:20:22## Zum Begriff der "segmentären" oder "segmentär differenzierten Gesellschaft" vgl. Émile Durkheim, Émile, 1992: Mechanische Solidarität aus Ähnlichkeiten, in: Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Studien über die Organisation höherer Gesellschaften, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, S. 118-161 [1893]; sowie zum Überblick: Online #00:28:58## Für Weber soll Staat „ein politischer Anstaltsbetrieb heißen, wenn und insoweit sein Verwaltungsstab erfolgreich das Monopol legitimen physischen Zwangs für die Durchführung der Ordnung in Anspruch nimmt". (Max Weber, 2005: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Frankfurt/M., S. 38. [1925]). An anderer Stelle hält er weiter fest: "Der Staat ist, ebenso wie die ihm geschichtlich vorausgehenden politischen Verbände, ein auf das Mittel der legitimen (das heißt: als legitim angesehenen) Gewaltsamkeit gestütztes Herrschaftsverhältnis von Menschen über Menschen." (1980: 822). Max Weber, 1980: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. 5. Aufl. Tübingen: Mohr. [1925] #00:29:28## Für Pierre Bourdieu ist der Staat vor allem auch eine erkenntnistheoretische Frage. Seinen Überlegungen zu Folge strukturiert der Staat, in dem er wesentliche Denk- und Wahrnehmungsschemate präfiguriert, unser Denken vor. Der Staat denkt sich also durch uns hindurch. Deshalb spricht Bourdieu davon, dass der Staat nicht nur – wie bei Weber – das Monopol der physischen Gewaltanwendung inne hat, sondern auch das der symbolischen. „In dem der Staat", so Bourdieu, „mit Autorität sagt, was ein Seiendes, ob Sache oder Person, seiner legitimen sozialen Definition nach wirklich ist (Urteil), das heißt, was es sein darf, was zu sein es ein Recht hat, auf welches soziale Sein es einen Rechtsanspruch hat, welchem Sein es einen Ausdruck zu verleihen, welches Sein es Ausdruck zu verleihen, welches Sein es auszuüben berechtigt ist […] übt der Staat eine wahrhaft schöpferische, gottähnliche Macht aus […]" (Pierre Bourdieu, 1998: Praktische Vernunft. Zur Theorie des Handelns. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, S. 115.) Die symbolische Macht des Staates liegt also vor allem auch in seiner Fähigkeit performativem Sprechens. Er ist damit die Konsekrationsinstanz der von ihm geschaffenen, sozialen Wirklichkeit und damit vor allem auch eine erkentnistheoretisch zu bedenkende Größe. (vgl. ebd, S. 96-136.). #00:35:22## Zur Figur der "Soziodizee" in Bezug auf den Staat vgl. ebd. #00:37:04## Zu Machiavellies Überlegungen zur Fürstenherrschaft siehe: Niccolò Machiavelli, 1995: Der Fürst. Aus dem Italienischen von Friedrich von Oppeln-Bronikowski. Mit einem Nachwort von Horst Günther. 5. Aufl. Frankfurt/M.: Insel-Verlag. [1532] #00:44:48## Die ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), die man besser als Institution oder Organisation, denn als Regulierungsbehörde benennt, nimmt eine zentrale Rolle bei der Strukturierung und Verwaltung des DNS (Domain Name Systems) des Internets ein. Sie reguliert also im weitesten Sinne den Adressraum des Internets. Mehr zur ICANN siehe hier: Online Zur Problematik der Organisation und Selbstorganisation der ICANN vgl. Jeanette Hofmann, Marc Holitscher, 2004: Zur Beziehung von Macht und Technik im Internet, in: Udo Thiedeke (Hrsg.): Soziologie des Cyberspace. Medien - Strukturen - Semantiken. Wiesbaden: VS. S. 411-436. #00:48:53## Der Soziologe Niklas Luhmann versteht den Staat als semantische Selbstbeschreibung einer organisierten Ordnung des politischen Systems, das er als Funktionssystem der modernen, funktional differenzierten Gesellschaft ansieht. Siehe: Niklas Luhmann, 2000: Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Posthum hrsg. v. André Kieserling. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. S. 190. #00:51:20## Ein Überblick zum Projekt "Stuttgart 21" und zum Bürgerprotest dagegen findet sich z.B. hier: Online #00:59:16## Der Hinweis zu Norbert Elias bezieht sich auf dessen Hauptwerk: Norbert Elias, 1969: Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. 2. Aufl. Bern, München: Francke. #01:02:26## Ulrich Beck hat Überlegungen zur Transnationalisierung in verschiedenen soziologischen Kontexten entwickelt, etwa zu Risikolagen oder zur Globalisierung. Sein Argument war dabei, dass angesichts globaler Risiken ein Übergang von nationaler und internationaler Politik zu "kosmopolitischer Politik" erfolgen müsse. Siehe: Ulrich Beck, 2002: Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. #01:03:36## Lepsius hat sich mehrfach mit der Problematik der Nation und des Nationalismus auch im europäischen Maßstab auseinander gesetzt. Siehe z.B. M. Rainer Lepsius, 1993: Die Europäische Gemeinschaft und die Zukunft des Nationalstaats. In: ders.: Demokratie in Deutschland. Soziologisch-historische Konstellationsanalysen. Ausgewählte Aufsätze. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. S. 249-263. #01:11:59## Zu Norbert Elias und der Herausbildung des staatlichen Gewaltmonopols vgl. Norbert Elias, 1997: Einleitung, in: ders.: Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Erster Band. Wandlungen des Verhaltens in den weltlichen Oberschichten des Abendlandes, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, S. 9-73; ders. 1997: Kurze Vorschau über die Soziogenese des Absolutismus, in: ders.: Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen, Zweiter Band. Wandlungen der Gesellschaft. Entwurf zu einer Theorie der Zivilisation, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, S. 17-23. #01:16:08## Hinweise zur Frühgeschichte der Hebräer finden sich bspw. bei Jan Assmann, 2015: Exodus. Die Revolution der Alten Welt, München: C.H.Beck; ders., 2000: Herrschaft und Heil. Politische Theologie in Ägypten, Israel und Europa, Darmstadt: WBG; Frank Crüsemann, 1978: Der Widerstand gegen das Königtum. Die antiköniglichen Texte des Alten Testaments und der Kampf um den frühen israelitischen Staat, Neukirchen: WMANT; Martin Buber, 1956: Königtum Gottes. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider. [alle Links aktuell November/Dezember 2015] Dauer 1:20:55 Folge direkt herunterladen
Dr. Armin Nassehi, ordentlicher Professor für Soziologie an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, unterhält sich mit Dr. Udo Thiedeke über uns als Architekten vergänglicher Dauerhaftigkeiten in einer Gesellschaft dauerhafter Vergänglichkeiten.Shownotes:#00:05:03# Hier kommt Kant auf die "Beharrlichkeit der Substanz" zu sprechen: Immanuel Kant, 1781: Critik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Hartknoch. S. 212#00:07:11# Zur Idee der "digitalisierten Codierung der Gesellschaft": Armin Nassehi, 2015: Die letzte Stunde der Wahrheit. Warum links und rechts keine Alternativen mehr sind und Gesellschaft ganz anders beschrieben werden muss. Hamburg: Murmann. S. 159ff.#00:07:58# Alois Hahn, 1983: Konsensfiktionen in Kleingruppen. Dargestellt am Beispiel von jungen Ehen, in: Friedhelm Neidhardt (Hrsg.): Gruppensoziologie. Perspektiven und Materialien. Sonderheft 25 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Köln: Westdeutscher Verlag. S. 210-232.#00:10:06# Hinweise auf Derridas Metaphysikkritik an Architekten und Architektur finden sich in seinem Briefwechsel mit Peter Eisenman, siehe: Peter Eisenman, 1995: Aura und Exzeß. Zur Überwindung der Metaphysik in der Architektur. Herausgegeben von Ullrich Schwarz. Wien: Passagen.#00:11:20# Siehe zur Bauweise und sozialen Konfiguration der "bürgerlichen Wohnung" im 19. Jhr.: Sophie Hellgardt, 2011: Zehn Zimmer: Die bürgerliche Stadtwohnung des 19. Jahrhunderts. Eine Analyse nach Norbert Elias. Köln: PapyRossa-Verlag.#00:12:10# Schon seit Jahrzehnten bevorzugen Architekturbüros loftähnliche Arbeitsumgebungen. Online#00:13:17# Ein Beispiel zur Architektur von Zaha Hadid, hier die Bergstation der Hungerburgbahn bei Innsbruck. Online #00:13:48# So sieht sie aus, die "Architecture" der BMW-Welt, wo Design die Funktion "trifft". Online#00:14:26# Der in Wien niedergelassene Architekt und Literat Adolf Loos polemisierte 1908 in seinem Vortrag "Ornament und Verbrechen" u.a. gegen die ornamentale Baukunst. In Auszügen siehe hier: Online#00:16:00# Zur Kleidermode als individuelles Reflexionsmedium siehe Udo Thiedeke, 2009: "Nur der zuletzt empfundene Eindruck ist wichtig" Mode als paradoxes Reflexionsmedium, in: Herbert Willems (Hrsg.): Theatralisierung der Gesellschaft. Bd. 1: Soziologische Theorien und Zeitdiagnose. Wiesbaden. VS-Verlag. S. 183-201.#00:18:55# Die angesprochene systemtheoretische Perspektive einer funktional, also nach Funktionen, Funktionssystemen und Funktionserwartungen differenzierten, Gesellschaft geht auf Niklas Luhmann zurück. Siehe z.B.: Niklas Luhmann, 1998: Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. 2. Teilband. Frankfurt/M. besonders S. 743ff.#00:24:17# Zur Kritik von Subjektivierungsprozessen siehe etwa bereits in den 1970er Jahren: Louis Althusser, 1976: Idéologie et appareils idéologiques d'État. Notes pour une recherche, in: Ders.: Positions. Paris. Éditions sociales. S. 79-137. Inzwischen in einer praxistheoretischen Fassung, etwa: Thomas Alkemeyer, 2013: Subjektivierung in sozialen Praktiken. Umrisse einer praxeologischen Analytik. in: Thomas Alkemeyer, Gunilla Budde, Dagmar Freist (Hrsg.): Selbst-Bildungen. Soziale und kulturelle Praktiken der Subjektivierung. Bielefeld: transcript. S. 29-64.#00:27:15# Die Protestantisierung der Diskurse mit Verweis auf Max Weber spielt auf dessen Untersuchung "Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus" an, siehe: Max Weber, 1920: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie I Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. S. 1-206.#00:28:50# Siehe zum Konzept des Habitus bei Pierre Bourdieu: Pierre Bourdieu, 1982: Die feinen Unterschiede - Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.#00:31:15# Wolfgang Streeck, 2013: Gekaufte Zeit. Die vertagte Krise des demokratischen Kapitalismus. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.#00:33:55# Zur Konfliktregulation durch Institutionen siehe z.B.: M. Rainer Lepsius, 1990: Interessen, Ideen und Institutionen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.#00:36:18# Zu den angesprochenen Übersetzungspraktiken: Armin Nassehi, 2015: Die letzte Stunde der Wahrheit. Warum links und rechts keine Alternativen mehr sind und Gesellschaft ganz anders beschrieben werden muss. Hamburg: Murmann. S. 267ff.#00:36:54# Zur Bedeutung von Organisationen für Individuen und die Mitgliedschaft in Organisationen siehe z.B. Niklas Luhmann, 2006: Organisation und Entscheidung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Siehe auch Kap. XIV "Organisation und Gesellschaft" in: ders., 1998: Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. S. 826ff.#00:43:28# das DFG Projekt „Übersetzungskonflikte" (Antragsteller: Armin Nassehi und Irmhild Saake) untersucht seit dem 1.4.2015 am Institut für Soziologie der LMU München, wie sich in ausgewählten Konfliktfällen der Gesellschaft (z.B. Palliativmedizin, Beschneidungsdebatte, Lebendorganspende) Sprecher unterschiedlicher Provenienz aufeinander beziehen und die unterschiedlichen Logiker in Echtzeit ineinander übersetzt werden.#00:47:00# Jürgen Habermas hat sich bereits in den 1970er Jahren Gedanken über die Revisionsfähigkeit politischer Entscheidungen gemacht. Siehe: Jürgen Habermas, 1976: Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. S. 117.#00:49:29# In Bezug zu den angesprochenen "Büroarbeitsplätzen ganz neuen Typs" bei Unicredit Hypo Vereinsbank München, siehe das Für und Wider in der Umsetzung z.B. von sog. Open-Space-Arbeitsplatzkonzepten: Online#00:54:40# Zum computergesteuerten, 'algorithmischen' Handel an den Börsen (Algotrading) und seinen Konsequenzen, siehe: Lothar Lochmaier, 2010: Algotrading: Wie selbst zerstörerisch ist der automatisierte Computerhandel? in Telepolis 18.10.2010. Online#00:56:30# Zur Vision von Howard Rheingold zur Virtual Commonity siehe: Howard Rheingold, 1993: The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley. Deutsche Ausgabe, 1994: Virtuelle Gemeinschaft: Soziale Beziehungen im Zeitalter des Computers. Bonn, Paris, Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley.#00:57:07# Zu den Verknüpfungs- und Analysevisionen grosser Datenmengen im I-Net (Big Data), siehe etwa eher feuilletonistisch: Heinrich Geiselberger und Tobias Moorstedt (Redaktion), 2013: Big Data. Das neue Versprechen der Allwissenheit. 2. Aufl. Berlin: Suhrkamp.#00:57:59# Hier der Verweis auf die "letzte Stunde": Armin Nassehi, 2015: Die letzte Stunde der Wahrheit: warum rechts und links keine Alternativen mehr sind und Gesellschaft ganz anders beschrieben werden muss. Hamburg: Murrmann.#00:59:45# Zu Übersicht über die utopischen Entwürfen der Gartenstadt und ihre Realisationen. Online#01:08:35# Gina Atzeni, 2016: Professionelles Erwartungsmanagement. Zur soziologischen Bedeutung des Arzt-Narrativ. Baden-Baden: Nomos.#01:09:38# Zur Siedlung Emmertsgrund auf dem Boxberg bei Heidelberg, die unter planerischer Mitwirkung von Alexander Mitscherlich entstand. Online#01:10:41# Ansatz und Problem der sog. Modernisierungstheorie in der Soziologie und Politikwissenschaft war vor allem in den 1960er und 70er Jahren gewesen, nicht nur theoretisch/empirische Einschätzungen der Entwicklung von Nationalstaaten, sondern Modelle für diese Entwicklung insbesondere unter Konvergenzgesichtspunkten hin zu einem "westlichen" Modell von Modernisierung zu liefern. Hierzu grundlegend: Daniel Lerner, 1958: The Passing of Traditional Society. Modernizing the Middle East. London: Macmillan.[alle Links aktuell Mai/Juni 2015]Dauer 01:15:28 Folge direkt herunterladen
Legacy of Leicester: Pivotal Achievements and Discoveries at University of Leicester
Norbert Elias is regarded today as the father of ‘figurational sociology’ and his groundbreaking book The Civilising Process remains as relevant as ever. He was described by Steven Pinker as “the greatest social thinker you’ve never heard of” Elias was born into a Jewish family in Poland in 1897 and fought in the German army during World War One then read for a degree in philosophy. His fundamental disagreement with then-popular Kantian principles led him to move into sociology, an academic field which was still only 30 years old. He took academic posts at Heidelberg and Frankfurt but when the National Socialists came to power in 1933 he moved to Paris and then to London (though he did not speak English). During this time he wrote his magnum opus, Über den Prozess der Zivilisation, which was published in Switzerland in 1939 but remained largely unknown for thirty years. This work, which covered European history from 800AD to 1900AD, was published in two volumes: The History of Manners and State Formation and Civilisation. By demonstrating how the formation of states and the monopolisation of power within them changed Western society forever, Elias was able to trace the ‘civilising’ of manners and personality in Western Europe since the late Middle Ages. In 1954, after years ‘on the fringes of academia’, Elias was finally offered a full-time post – at the University of Leicester – where he spent eight years building up a thriving Department of Sociology before retiring in 1962. During his time at Leicester he refined and developed the ideas first presented in The Civilising Process including his original notion of ‘figurational sociology’, the study of interdependent, constantly shifting groups of people. The Civilising Process was finally published in English in 1969 (vol.1) and 1982 (vol.2) but it was only in 2000, ten years after Elias’ death, that a single definitive translation appeared, incorporating the updates and revisions from his time at Leicester.
Thomas Geisen presents his paper 'The complexity of migration: life-strategies of migrant family members and families' in Parallel session I(D) of the conference Examining Migration Dynamics: Networks and Beyond, 24-26 Sept 2013 In migration research the concepts of network and transnationalism gained new insights on migrants as social actors. Most important was, that decision-making and balancing processes became bound back to the individual and its network-relations. In this course a new emphasis was given to the relevance of the migrant family as an important social actor in migration processes. For transnationalism the family is the most important social unit, which binds individuals together in an intergenerational social context, often over long geographical distances. It seems, that the family has become the most emplematic social form of transnationalism. However, looking at concrete family practices it can be shown, that the family itself is embedded into wider social relations build within the community or the society. Based on own empirical research on migrant families, the proposed paper wants do develop a conceptional approch for migration research which is centered on migrants as social actors. Here migration is understood in a wider perspective as a change in residence beyond communal borders. Starting with such a perspective not only different forms of migration can be identified in a biographical or life-course perspective. It can be shown as well what relevance the experience of migration and mobility has for individual and collective actors, wat motifs are relevant for migrants in intergenerational and interactional perspective, and what individual and collective motifs and orientations lead migrants and migrant families to migrate . Under such a process-perspective of migration, the still existing cleavage in migration research between international and internal migration shows its limitations for understanding migrants and their families. Based on Norbert Elias concept of figuration and on Ernest Jouhys concept of social relations, the proposed paper seeks to discuss the complexity of migration by introducing the concept of live-strategies to enrich the understanding of migration networks and dynamics by discussing the decisive relevance of the 'subjecitve factor' for understanding the migration of family members and migrant families.
Socioloog Johan Goudsblom nam in 1997 afscheid als hoogleraar van de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Zijn memoires verschijnen dezer dagen in Tirade, het literaire tijdschrift dat hij mede oprichtte. Gesprek over sociologie, Norbert Elias, wetenschap, literatuur en het leven zelf. Anton de Goede over dit gesprek: Waarom ik Joop Goudsblom zo graag wil spreken? Hij is een van Nederlands grootste sociologen, en dat terwijl we hem erg weinig horen. Waar Radio 1 dagelijks bol staat van allerlei meningen over aangespoelde bultruggen, kleine en grote schandalen, financiële onheilstijdingen en wat dies meer zij, wil ik dolgraag iemand aan het woord laten die een leven lang studie heeft gemaakt van hoe de mens zich ontwikkelt, of niet ontwikkelt. Wat laat zich zeggen over de wereld van nu als we die door de blik van Goudsblom waarnemen? Wat is de erfenis van denkers als Menno ter Braak en Norbert Elias die hij intensief bestudeerde? In hoeverre zal de invloed van de huidige financiële crisis op onze samenleving vergelijkbaar zijn met die van de crisis uit de jaren dertig van de vorige eeuw? Zeker, grote thema’s. Maar dat is het mooie van het marathoninterview: we kunnen drie uur de tijd nemen. Inleiding en Samenvattingen Goudsblom Joop Goudsblom werd tachtig jaar geleden geboren in Bergen - Noord-Holland als zoon van een onderwijzer en hij groeide op in Krommenie. Al op jeugdige leeftijd bracht hij zijn vrije tijd door niet op de Noordhollandse voetbalvelden, maar in het Rijksarchief te Haarlem, wat hij ervoer als Het Paradijs!, om al op zijn zestiende in plaatselijke kranten te kunnen publiceren, bijvoorbeeld over de geschiedenis van de Zaanse molens Hij zou geen gerschiedenis, maar sociale psychologie en pedagogiek gaan studeren aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, in de jaren vijftig. In die tijd maakte hij ook deel uit van de redactie van het studentenblad Propria Cures , waarin hij schreef onder de alter ego’s van een hele reeks pseudoniemen. Ook behoorde hij tot de oprichters van het literaire tijdschrift Tirade. Zijn aforismen en poezie zijn gebundeld in Pasmunt (verschenen in 1958) en Reserves (uit 1998). Maar ook de literatuur kon hem niet afbrengen van de sociologie. Van 1968 tot 1997 was hij hoogleraar aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam waar hij bekend werd als verbreider van de civilisatietheorie van Norbert Elias. Ook werd hij genoemd: de aartsvader van de zogeheten Amsterdamse school binnen de sociologie. Goudsblom woont dan ook in Amsterdam en was sinds 1958 getrouwd met Maria Goudsblom-Oestreicher tot haar overlijden in 2009. Samen kregen zij twee kinderen. Joop Goudsblom publiceerde in 1960 zijn proefschrift Nihilisme en cultuur, dat door nogal wat liefhebbers onder wie Arnon Grunberg een uiterst belangrijke studie wordt gevonden. Voor zijn boek Balans van de sociologie ontving hij in 1975 de essayprijs van de stad Amsterdam en ook voor zijn boek Vuur en beschaving, dat in meerdere talen werd vertaald, oogstte hij veel lof. In 1997 nam hij als hoogleraar afscheid van de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Zijn memoires verschijnen dezer dagen in Tirade, het literaire tijdschrift dat hij mede oprichtte. Luistert u naar een gesprek over de wetenschap in het algemeen, sociologie in het bijzonder, de erfenis van Norbert Elias, het gedachtegoed van Menno ter Braak en wat er dan nog overschiet aan: het leven zelf. Een uitspraak van Joop Goudsblom luidt: “ Sociologie is een manier om de intellectuele verwarring te verminderen.” Welnu, vermindering van verwarring ? Wie wil dat niet in deze onzekere tijden? Samenvatting uur1 en uur 2: Het vak sociale psychologie laat zich in 1 zin samenvatten. Mensen zijn door en door sociale wezens, dat gaat ook op voor Joop Goudsblom. Niet de mens is een sociaal wezen, maar mensen in het meervoud zijn door en door sociale wezens. Want ook al zat hij op zijn 16e liever in het archief dan op het voetbalveld, hij sloot zich niet af, maar zocht daar de waardering van volwassenen. Zijn moeder nam hem mee naar een buurman, de amateurhistoricus meneer van Vliet, met het verzoek: praat eens met die jongen. Dat wilde meneer van Vliet wel; in een paar maanden had Goudsblom zijn boeken uit en meneer van Vliet stuurde hem naar het archief. En daar zat hij en zocht dingen uit, bijvoorbeeld over de geschiedenis van de Zaanse Molens; die streek uit zijn jeugd vol geuren waar hij lyrisch over kan worden. Maar het werd geen geschiedenis, het werd sociale en politieke wetenschappen, want dat was de toekomst. En geschiedenis erbij, dat kon niet. Goudsblom had het wel geprobeerd, maar de grote historicus Jan Romijn, wilde hem als eerstejaars niet ontvangen; dus wilde Joop Goudsblom die zichzelf terugkijkend een geborneerd baasje noemt, niets met Jan Romijn te maken hebben. Zo zijn we een groot historicus misgelopen! Op deze betekenisvolle christelijke dag bekende Goudsblom zich tot wat hij noemt de Lucretianen: de ketters die altijd weer moeten zeggend dat drie verschillende universele waarheden nooit tegelijk waar kunnen zijn. Niet dat falsificatie, het aantonen van ongelijk, het enige zaligmakende is, zeker niet in de sociasle wetenschappen. Daar kan ook het vinden van voorbeelden die gelijk aantonen heel relevant zijn: en de anti sociologische stemmen van Karel van het Reve en Jan blokker zijn enigszins zwakker geworden. Welke waarheid van heeft zijn vak opgeleverd. Het civilisatieproces van Norbert Elias dat minimaal al een half miljoen jaar aan de de gang, is een proces waardoor mensen als soort sterker zijn komen te staan tegenover andere dieren. In die zin wil Goudsblom het zo graag nog hebben over het vuur: bepalend van hoe Goudsblom naar mensen kijkt. Dat gaat gebeuren in uur 3.
Socioloog Johan Goudsblom nam in 1997 afscheid als hoogleraar van de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Zijn memoires verschenen in Tirade, het literaire tijdschrift dat hij mede oprichtte. Gesprek over sociologie, Norbert Elias, wetenschap, literatuur en het leven zelf. Interviewer: Anton de Goede
Professor Stephen Mennell (UCD) gives a workshop on the life and work of influential sociologist Norbert Elias.
Wars van grenzen Abram de Swaan, prominent socioloog en winnaar van de P.C. Hooftprijs, liet zich zelden wat gelegen liggen aan de grenzen van zijn vakgebied. Begin 2007 ging de hoogleraar aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam met emeritaat, zoals dat nu eenmaal gaat als je 65 wordt. De Swaan is een scherp analyticus van het tijdgewricht. Zo merkte opvolger Jan Willem Duyvendak bij De Swaans afscheid van de UvA op dat de Nederlandse verzorgingsstaat in verval raakte, nadat De Swaan er zijn wetenschappelijke belangstelling voor was verloren. Hier kunt u luisteren naar een vijf uur durend interview tussen Geert Mak en Abram de Swaan. Biografie Abram de Swaan geb. 8 januari 1942 Altijd daar waar het gebeurt Abram de Swaan werd geboren op 8 januari 1942, midden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Zijn eerste jaren bracht Abram de Swaan door op een onderduikadres in Beverwijk, omdat zijn vader directeur was van het linkse tijdschrift De Vrije Katheder. Gerard Reve was een graag geziene gast bij de familie De Swaan. Op de één of andere manier wist De Swaan altijd op het juiste moment op de juiste plek te zijn. Hij studeerde politicologie – zes vakken voor de prijs van één – aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, deed er ook nog wiskunde en psychoanalyse bij – De Swaan is tien jaar psychotherapeut geweest. Hij schreef in twee jaar tijd ongeveer driehonderd artikelen voor Propria Cures. Eén van die artikelen, waarin hij het evangelie parodieerde, kwam hem nog op een aanklacht wegens godslastering te staan, ingediend door de gereformeerde gemeente van het Zeeuwse eiland Tholen. Hij moest een boete van honderd gulden betalen. Aan de universiteiten van Yale en Berkely heeft hij ook politicologie gestudeerd en wetenschappelijk onderzoek gedaan. Dat was in 1967 en 1968, het jaar van de fameuze Summer of Love. Teruggekomen in Amsterdam werd prompt het Maagdenhuis bezet. In de Verenigde Staten werkte hij ook voor de Deutsche Rundfunk , waarvoor hij popsterren interviewde. Ook Fidel Castro ontkwam niet aan De Swaans prangende vragen. Voor de VPRO maakte De Swaan de documentaire over lopende bandwerk en de geestdodendheid daarvan, Een Boterham met Tevredenheid genaamd. In 1973 promoveerde hij – met een proefschrift over kabinetsformaties in elf landen – en vier jaar later werd hij op 35-jarige leeftijd hoogleraar. Socioloog Johan Goudsblom haalde hem over om op sociologie over te stappen en maakte hem met het werk van Norbert Elias bekend. Voor de duizendpoot bracht het werk van de beroemde socioloog enige eenheid en overzichtelijkheid in zijn leven. De Swaan staat bekend om zijn oorspronkelijke pen. In zijn stukken en essays verbindt hij allerlei disciplines met elkaar, zoals geschiedenis en sociale filosofie. Voor NRC Handelsblad heeft hij lange tijd columns geschreven. De jury van de P.C. Hooftprijs roemde De Swaans “glasheldere en lenige stijl, waar het plezier in schrijven vanaf vonkt. Hoewel hij zijn lezers niet onderschat en geen moeite doet om complexe materie eenvoudiger voor te stellen dan die is, valt er in zijn hele oeuvre geen onbegrijpelijke zin aan te wijzen. Abram de Swaan heeft een indrukwekkend oeuvre op zijn naam staan. En dat oeuvre heeft bijzondere literaire kwaliteiten (…)” De Swaan krijgt de P.C. Hooftprijs op donderdag 22 mei 2008, de dag na de sterfdag van de beroemde dichter.
Wars van grenzen Abram de Swaan, prominent socioloog en winnaar van de P.C. Hooftprijs, liet zich zelden wat gelegen liggen aan de grenzen van zijn vakgebied. Begin 2007 ging de hoogleraar aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam met emeritaat, zoals dat nu eenmaal gaat als je 65 wordt. De Swaan is een scherp analyticus van het tijdgewricht. Zo merkte opvolger Jan Willem Duyvendak bij De Swaans afscheid van de UvA op dat de Nederlandse verzorgingsstaat in verval raakte, nadat De Swaan er zijn wetenschappelijke belangstelling voor was verloren. Hier kunt u luisteren naar een vijf uur durend interview tussen Geert Mak en Abram de Swaan. Biografie Abram de Swaan geb. 8 januari 1942 Altijd daar waar het gebeurt Abram de Swaan werd geboren op 8 januari 1942, midden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Zijn eerste jaren bracht Abram de Swaan door op een onderduikadres in Beverwijk, omdat zijn vader directeur was van het linkse tijdschrift De Vrije Katheder. Gerard Reve was een graag geziene gast bij de familie De Swaan. Op de één of andere manier wist De Swaan altijd op het juiste moment op de juiste plek te zijn. Hij studeerde politicologie – zes vakken voor de prijs van één – aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, deed er ook nog wiskunde en psychoanalyse bij – De Swaan is tien jaar psychotherapeut geweest. Hij schreef in twee jaar tijd ongeveer driehonderd artikelen voor Propria Cures. Eén van die artikelen, waarin hij het evangelie parodieerde, kwam hem nog op een aanklacht wegens godslastering te staan, ingediend door de gereformeerde gemeente van het Zeeuwse eiland Tholen. Hij moest een boete van honderd gulden betalen. Aan de universiteiten van Yale en Berkely heeft hij ook politicologie gestudeerd en wetenschappelijk onderzoek gedaan. Dat was in 1967 en 1968, het jaar van de fameuze Summer of Love. Teruggekomen in Amsterdam werd prompt het Maagdenhuis bezet. In de Verenigde Staten werkte hij ook voor de Deutsche Rundfunk , waarvoor hij popsterren interviewde. Ook Fidel Castro ontkwam niet aan De Swaans prangende vragen. Voor de VPRO maakte De Swaan de documentaire over lopende bandwerk en de geestdodendheid daarvan, Een Boterham met Tevredenheid genaamd. In 1973 promoveerde hij – met een proefschrift over kabinetsformaties in elf landen – en vier jaar later werd hij op 35-jarige leeftijd hoogleraar. Socioloog Johan Goudsblom haalde hem over om op sociologie over te stappen en maakte hem met het werk van Norbert Elias bekend. Voor de duizendpoot bracht het werk van de beroemde socioloog enige eenheid en overzichtelijkheid in zijn leven. De Swaan staat bekend om zijn oorspronkelijke pen. In zijn stukken en essays verbindt hij allerlei disciplines met elkaar, zoals geschiedenis en sociale filosofie. Voor NRC Handelsblad heeft hij lange tijd columns geschreven. De jury van de P.C. Hooftprijs roemde De Swaans “glasheldere en lenige stijl, waar het plezier in schrijven vanaf vonkt. Hoewel hij zijn lezers niet onderschat en geen moeite doet om complexe materie eenvoudiger voor te stellen dan die is, valt er in zijn hele oeuvre geen onbegrijpelijke zin aan te wijzen. Abram de Swaan heeft een indrukwekkend oeuvre op zijn naam staan. En dat oeuvre heeft bijzondere literaire kwaliteiten (…)” De Swaan krijgt de P.C. Hooftprijs op donderdag 22 mei 2008, de dag na de sterfdag van de beroemde dichter.
Wars van grenzen Abram de Swaan, prominent socioloog en winnaar van de P.C. Hooftprijs, liet zich zelden wat gelegen liggen aan de grenzen van zijn vakgebied. Begin 2007 ging de hoogleraar aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam met emeritaat, zoals dat nu eenmaal gaat als je 65 wordt. De Swaan is een scherp analyticus van het tijdgewricht. Zo merkte opvolger Jan Willem Duyvendak bij De Swaans afscheid van de UvA op dat de Nederlandse verzorgingsstaat in verval raakte, nadat De Swaan er zijn wetenschappelijke belangstelling voor was verloren. Hier kunt u luisteren naar een vijf uur durend interview tussen Geert Mak en Abram de Swaan. Biografie Abram de Swaan geb. 8 januari 1942 Altijd daar waar het gebeurt Abram de Swaan werd geboren op 8 januari 1942, midden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Zijn eerste jaren bracht Abram de Swaan door op een onderduikadres in Beverwijk, omdat zijn vader directeur was van het linkse tijdschrift De Vrije Katheder. Gerard Reve was een graag geziene gast bij de familie De Swaan. Op de één of andere manier wist De Swaan altijd op het juiste moment op de juiste plek te zijn. Hij studeerde politicologie – zes vakken voor de prijs van één – aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, deed er ook nog wiskunde en psychoanalyse bij – De Swaan is tien jaar psychotherapeut geweest. Hij schreef in twee jaar tijd ongeveer driehonderd artikelen voor Propria Cures. Eén van die artikelen, waarin hij het evangelie parodieerde, kwam hem nog op een aanklacht wegens godslastering te staan, ingediend door de gereformeerde gemeente van het Zeeuwse eiland Tholen. Hij moest een boete van honderd gulden betalen. Aan de universiteiten van Yale en Berkely heeft hij ook politicologie gestudeerd en wetenschappelijk onderzoek gedaan. Dat was in 1967 en 1968, het jaar van de fameuze Summer of Love. Teruggekomen in Amsterdam werd prompt het Maagdenhuis bezet. In de Verenigde Staten werkte hij ook voor de Deutsche Rundfunk , waarvoor hij popsterren interviewde. Ook Fidel Castro ontkwam niet aan De Swaans prangende vragen. Voor de VPRO maakte De Swaan de documentaire over lopende bandwerk en de geestdodendheid daarvan, Een Boterham met Tevredenheid genaamd. In 1973 promoveerde hij – met een proefschrift over kabinetsformaties in elf landen – en vier jaar later werd hij op 35-jarige leeftijd hoogleraar. Socioloog Johan Goudsblom haalde hem over om op sociologie over te stappen en maakte hem met het werk van Norbert Elias bekend. Voor de duizendpoot bracht het werk van de beroemde socioloog enige eenheid en overzichtelijkheid in zijn leven. De Swaan staat bekend om zijn oorspronkelijke pen. In zijn stukken en essays verbindt hij allerlei disciplines met elkaar, zoals geschiedenis en sociale filosofie. Voor NRC Handelsblad heeft hij lange tijd columns geschreven. De jury van de P.C. Hooftprijs roemde De Swaans “glasheldere en lenige stijl, waar het plezier in schrijven vanaf vonkt. Hoewel hij zijn lezers niet onderschat en geen moeite doet om complexe materie eenvoudiger voor te stellen dan die is, valt er in zijn hele oeuvre geen onbegrijpelijke zin aan te wijzen. Abram de Swaan heeft een indrukwekkend oeuvre op zijn naam staan. En dat oeuvre heeft bijzondere literaire kwaliteiten (…)” De Swaan krijgt de P.C. Hooftprijs op donderdag 22 mei 2008, de dag na de sterfdag van de beroemde dichter.
Wars van grenzen Abram de Swaan, prominent socioloog en winnaar van de P.C. Hooftprijs, liet zich zelden wat gelegen liggen aan de grenzen van zijn vakgebied. Begin 2007 ging de hoogleraar aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam met emeritaat, zoals dat nu eenmaal gaat als je 65 wordt. De Swaan is een scherp analyticus van het tijdgewricht. Zo merkte opvolger Jan Willem Duyvendak bij De Swaans afscheid van de UvA op dat de Nederlandse verzorgingsstaat in verval raakte, nadat De Swaan er zijn wetenschappelijke belangstelling voor was verloren. Hier kunt u luisteren naar een vijf uur durend interview tussen Geert Mak en Abram de Swaan. Biografie Abram de Swaan geb. 8 januari 1942 Altijd daar waar het gebeurt Abram de Swaan werd geboren op 8 januari 1942, midden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Zijn eerste jaren bracht Abram de Swaan door op een onderduikadres in Beverwijk, omdat zijn vader directeur was van het linkse tijdschrift De Vrije Katheder. Gerard Reve was een graag geziene gast bij de familie De Swaan. Op de één of andere manier wist De Swaan altijd op het juiste moment op de juiste plek te zijn. Hij studeerde politicologie – zes vakken voor de prijs van één – aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, deed er ook nog wiskunde en psychoanalyse bij – De Swaan is tien jaar psychotherapeut geweest. Hij schreef in twee jaar tijd ongeveer driehonderd artikelen voor Propria Cures. Eén van die artikelen, waarin hij het evangelie parodieerde, kwam hem nog op een aanklacht wegens godslastering te staan, ingediend door de gereformeerde gemeente van het Zeeuwse eiland Tholen. Hij moest een boete van honderd gulden betalen. Aan de universiteiten van Yale en Berkely heeft hij ook politicologie gestudeerd en wetenschappelijk onderzoek gedaan. Dat was in 1967 en 1968, het jaar van de fameuze Summer of Love. Teruggekomen in Amsterdam werd prompt het Maagdenhuis bezet. In de Verenigde Staten werkte hij ook voor de Deutsche Rundfunk , waarvoor hij popsterren interviewde. Ook Fidel Castro ontkwam niet aan De Swaans prangende vragen. Voor de VPRO maakte De Swaan de documentaire over lopende bandwerk en de geestdodendheid daarvan, Een Boterham met Tevredenheid genaamd. In 1973 promoveerde hij – met een proefschrift over kabinetsformaties in elf landen – en vier jaar later werd hij op 35-jarige leeftijd hoogleraar. Socioloog Johan Goudsblom haalde hem over om op sociologie over te stappen en maakte hem met het werk van Norbert Elias bekend. Voor de duizendpoot bracht het werk van de beroemde socioloog enige eenheid en overzichtelijkheid in zijn leven. De Swaan staat bekend om zijn oorspronkelijke pen. In zijn stukken en essays verbindt hij allerlei disciplines met elkaar, zoals geschiedenis en sociale filosofie. Voor NRC Handelsblad heeft hij lange tijd columns geschreven. De jury van de P.C. Hooftprijs roemde De Swaans “glasheldere en lenige stijl, waar het plezier in schrijven vanaf vonkt. Hoewel hij zijn lezers niet onderschat en geen moeite doet om complexe materie eenvoudiger voor te stellen dan die is, valt er in zijn hele oeuvre geen onbegrijpelijke zin aan te wijzen. Abram de Swaan heeft een indrukwekkend oeuvre op zijn naam staan. En dat oeuvre heeft bijzondere literaire kwaliteiten (…)” De Swaan krijgt de P.C. Hooftprijs op donderdag 22 mei 2008, de dag na de sterfdag van de beroemde dichter.
Wars van grenzen Abram de Swaan, prominent socioloog en winnaar van de P.C. Hooftprijs, liet zich zelden wat gelegen liggen aan de grenzen van zijn vakgebied. Begin 2007 ging de hoogleraar aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam met emeritaat, zoals dat nu eenmaal gaat als je 65 wordt. De Swaan is een scherp analyticus van het tijdgewricht. Zo merkte opvolger Jan Willem Duyvendak bij De Swaans afscheid van de UvA op dat de Nederlandse verzorgingsstaat in verval raakte, nadat De Swaan er zijn wetenschappelijke belangstelling voor was verloren. Hier kunt u luisteren naar een vijf uur durend interview tussen Geert Mak en Abram de Swaan. Biografie Abram de Swaan geb. 8 januari 1942 Altijd daar waar het gebeurt Abram de Swaan werd geboren op 8 januari 1942, midden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Zijn eerste jaren bracht Abram de Swaan door op een onderduikadres in Beverwijk, omdat zijn vader directeur was van het linkse tijdschrift De Vrije Katheder. Gerard Reve was een graag geziene gast bij de familie De Swaan. Op de één of andere manier wist De Swaan altijd op het juiste moment op de juiste plek te zijn. Hij studeerde politicologie – zes vakken voor de prijs van één – aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, deed er ook nog wiskunde en psychoanalyse bij – De Swaan is tien jaar psychotherapeut geweest. Hij schreef in twee jaar tijd ongeveer driehonderd artikelen voor Propria Cures. Eén van die artikelen, waarin hij het evangelie parodieerde, kwam hem nog op een aanklacht wegens godslastering te staan, ingediend door de gereformeerde gemeente van het Zeeuwse eiland Tholen. Hij moest een boete van honderd gulden betalen. Aan de universiteiten van Yale en Berkely heeft hij ook politicologie gestudeerd en wetenschappelijk onderzoek gedaan. Dat was in 1967 en 1968, het jaar van de fameuze Summer of Love. Teruggekomen in Amsterdam werd prompt het Maagdenhuis bezet. In de Verenigde Staten werkte hij ook voor de Deutsche Rundfunk , waarvoor hij popsterren interviewde. Ook Fidel Castro ontkwam niet aan De Swaans prangende vragen. Voor de VPRO maakte De Swaan de documentaire over lopende bandwerk en de geestdodendheid daarvan, Een Boterham met Tevredenheid genaamd. In 1973 promoveerde hij – met een proefschrift over kabinetsformaties in elf landen – en vier jaar later werd hij op 35-jarige leeftijd hoogleraar. Socioloog Johan Goudsblom haalde hem over om op sociologie over te stappen en maakte hem met het werk van Norbert Elias bekend. Voor de duizendpoot bracht het werk van de beroemde socioloog enige eenheid en overzichtelijkheid in zijn leven. De Swaan staat bekend om zijn oorspronkelijke pen. In zijn stukken en essays verbindt hij allerlei disciplines met elkaar, zoals geschiedenis en sociale filosofie. Voor NRC Handelsblad heeft hij lange tijd columns geschreven. De jury van de P.C. Hooftprijs roemde De Swaans “glasheldere en lenige stijl, waar het plezier in schrijven vanaf vonkt. Hoewel hij zijn lezers niet onderschat en geen moeite doet om complexe materie eenvoudiger voor te stellen dan die is, valt er in zijn hele oeuvre geen onbegrijpelijke zin aan te wijzen. Abram de Swaan heeft een indrukwekkend oeuvre op zijn naam staan. En dat oeuvre heeft bijzondere literaire kwaliteiten (…)” De Swaan krijgt de P.C. Hooftprijs op donderdag 22 mei 2008, de dag na de sterfdag van de beroemde dichter.