POPULARITY
6 episodes with Seles
8 episodes with Seles
3 episodes with Seles
2 episodes with Seles
2 episodes with Seles
6 episodes with Seles
2 episodes with Seles
2 episodes with Seles
2 episodes with Seles
“I take people as a story… I can see their higher self before they can.” – Carlos Salum Carlos grew up under Argentina's military dictatorship—surrounded by uncertainty, but also by entrepreneurs, poets, and principled people who knew how to thrive despite it. That tension didn't crush him. It sharpened his vision—so much so that, by adulthood, traditional paths like law & medicine felt like cages, not callings. So he did what most people won't: He bet on himself. On a handshake, he pitched a partnership to the world's top tennis coach. No credentials. No fancy title. Just conviction. Then he flew to Germany, crashed on a friend's couch, & hustled up a seven-city speaking tour with no internet, no safety net, & no backup plan. Eight months later, the world's biggest sports agency called him “Houdini” as he coached legends like Agassi, Seles, & Sampras. But it was never just about tennis. It was always about helping people live with alignment, intention, and impact. Today, he brings that same fire to business owners. Ready to align with something deeper? Find him at SalumInternational.com. Joseph Campbell said, “The privilege of a lifetime is being who you are.” Carlos helps people remember that.
DEN Y SELES DARA | PREDICACIÓN | 17 MARZO 2025 PATRIARCA ANDRÉS TIRADODONACIONES: PAYPAL: https://paypal.me/OBISPOANDRESTIRADOFACEBOOK PAGINAShttps://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063452115636LINKEDINhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/arzobispo-andres-tirado-perez-b1b4a89a/CANAL DE WHATSAAP EXORCISTA PATRIARCA ANDRES TIRADO https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaY3VsHCxoAthlCKuA3tINSTAGRAMhttps://www.instagram.com/obispoandrestirado/?hl=es-laTWITTERhttps://twitter.com/PADREANDRESYOUTUBEhttps://www.youtube.com/user/CONGREGACIONCSI/videosTIK TOK OBISPO ANDRÉS TIRADOhttps://www.tiktok.com/@obispoandrestirado?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pcCongregación Sacerdotal Internacional – Católicos IndependientesNO representamos a la Iglesia Católica Apostólica RomanaWEB: www.congregacionsacerdotal.orgE-mail padreandrestirado@gmail.com
Šoreiz "Neatliekamās sarunas laikā" dodamies uz Dzintaru koncertzāli, lai satiktu vijolnieci, LNSO rezidējošo mākslinieci Vinetu Sareiku un plašāk runātu par koncertprogrammu "Vineta Sareika un LNSO stīgas", kas 28. februārī pulksten 19 skanēs Dzintaru koncertzāles Mazajā zālē, bet 1. martā pulksten 17 - Ventspils koncertzālē "Latvija". Koncertprogramma rosinās klausītājus uz pārdomām par dzīvi un mūžību caur Bārbera, Šūberta un Hartmaņa filozofiskākajiem opusiem. Tā kā saruna notiek tūlīt pēc mēģinājuma, runājam par vibrācijām un mūzikas emocionālo lauku, cik ilgi tas jau dzīvo vijolniecē, un noskaidrojam, vai Vinetai kā LNSO rezidējošai māksliniecei bija brīvība programmas izvēlē. Runājam arī par mūzikas tumšajām krāsām un kontekstu ar šī brīža sajūtām, par to, kur atrast un ieraudzīt cerību staru, un arī par mākslinieka uzdevumiem šobrīd... Pieskaramies arī 13. marta programmai, kad LNSO kamermūzikas cikla koncertā notiks jauna trio debija: ansamblī apvienojušās Vineta Sareika, Lauma Skride un beļģu klarmnetiste Annelīne van Vauve. Tajā daudz spilgtu raksturskaņdarbu un ugunīgu ritmu!
"Klasikā" tiekamies ar stikla mākslinieci Andu Munkevicu, kuras darbi ir pazīstami gan Latvijā, gan Eiropā, gan Amerikā, bet pirms nedēļas Dekoratīvās mākslas un dizaina muzejā durvis vērusi Baltijas mūsdienu stikla izstāde "Slāņi", kurā skatāms arī Andas darbs "Iztaisno muguru!" ("Spine"). Inta Zēgnere: Tāds neparasts nosaukums šim darbam. Ko īsti ar to vēlējies pateikt? Par ko ir šis darbs? Anda Munkevica: Tā ir šodiena. Katrā no mums tam vajadzētu būt kā bauslim... Darbu veidoju, domājot un veltot to ukraiņu gara stiprumam un pasaules notikumiem šodienas kontekstā. Vienmēr esmu domājusi par to, kā ir tiem cilvēkiem, kuri atrodas mājās, kad viņus bombardē. Kā viņi jūtas, kā viņi saslēdzas. Un, neskatoties ne uz ko, nākamajā rītā noslauka pelnus un putekļus, iztaisno muguru un iet tālāk. Dzīvo tālāk. Tā patiesībā ir arī mūsu atbildība par to, ko darām ikdienā, kāpēc esam piedzimuši. Šie mūžīgie jautājumi: kādus darbus savā dzīvē darām? Kādas ir mūsu attiecības ar apkārtējiem – arī ar dabu. Tas arī ir šis te "Iztaisno muguru!" jeb dvēseles mugurkauls, kas patiesībā ir tas svarīgākais mūsu dzīvē. Šo mugurkaulu esmu veidojusi no dažādu paaudžu kopā saliktām rociņām… Tās veido mugurkaulu un faktiski arī ribāju. Mēs, cilvēki, esam savienoti vienotā asinsrites sistēmā, vienotā nervu sistēmā. Un kaut kur, kaut kādā ziņā mēs esam brāļi. To, starp citu, arī Arvo Perts saka savos darbos. Brāļi. Un tad ir jautājums: kāpēc viens brālis nosveras agresijas, varas, naudaskāras pusē, bet otrs – mīlestības, ģimenes, harmonijas un sirdsapziņas pusē? Kur ir tā robeža, kas viņus nošķir? Par tām rokām. Tās nav tādas abstraktas rokas, bet gan konkrētu cilvēku rokas, kas šo mugurkaulu satur kopā. Vai tu atšifrēsi nedaudz? Rokas es izvēlējos, jo tās aug no sirds. Ja skatāmies uz to anatomiski, tās ir kā mūsu dvēseles antenas, un visus darbus, ko darām, mēs darām ar rokām. Cilvēki, kuru rokas es izvēlējos, ir ļoti konkrēti. Apakšā šo skulptūru satur kopā tāds kā kodols, saknes. Apakšā ir vecajie, gudrajie, kas ir mana mammīte un augstskolas profesors. Tālāk seko mūsu aizstāvji, sarga ukraiņu karavīru rokas, un tālāk uz augšu: vīrs un es, un mani dēli, jaunas sievietes rokas ar cerību uz nākotni pie jaunākiem bērniem, un pašā augšgalā – desmitgadīga puikas rokas, kas ir skats uz nākotni, vērsts uz visu jauno. Ar cerību. Vairāk – ierakstā. ***
"Klasikā" tiekamies ar stikla mākslinieci Andu Munkevicu, kuras darbi ir pazīstami gan Latvijā, gan Eiropā, gan Amerikā, bet pirms nedēļas Dekoratīvās mākslas un dizaina muzejā durvis vērusi Baltijas mūsdienu stikla izstāde "Slāņi", kurā skatāms arī Andas darbs "Iztaisno muguru!" ("Spine"). Inta Zēgnere: Tāds neparasts nosaukums šim darbam. Ko īsti ar to vēlējies pateikt? Par ko ir šis darbs? Anda Munkevica: Tā ir šodiena. Katrā no mums tam vajadzētu būt kā bauslim... Darbu veidoju, domājot un veltot to ukraiņu gara stiprumam un pasaules notikumiem šodienas kontekstā. Vienmēr esmu domājusi par to, kā ir tiem cilvēkiem, kuri atrodas mājās, kad viņus bombardē. Kā viņi jūtas, kā viņi saslēdzas. Un, neskatoties ne uz ko, nākamajā rītā noslauka pelnus un putekļus, iztaisno muguru un iet tālāk. Dzīvo tālāk. Tā patiesībā ir arī mūsu atbildība par to, ko darām ikdienā, kāpēc esam piedzimuši. Šie mūžīgie jautājumi: kādus darbus savā dzīvē darām? Kādas ir mūsu attiecības ar apkārtējiem – arī ar dabu. Tas arī ir šis te "Iztaisno muguru!" jeb dvēseles mugurkauls, kas patiesībā ir tas svarīgākais mūsu dzīvē. Šo mugurkaulu esmu veidojusi no dažādu paaudžu kopā saliktām rociņām… Tās veido mugurkaulu un faktiski arī ribāju. Mēs, cilvēki, esam savienoti vienotā asinsrites sistēmā, vienotā nervu sistēmā. Un kaut kur, kaut kādā ziņā mēs esam brāļi. To, starp citu, arī Arvo Perts saka savos darbos. Brāļi. Un tad ir jautājums: kāpēc viens brālis nosveras agresijas, varas, naudaskāras pusē, bet otrs – mīlestības, ģimenes, harmonijas un sirdsapziņas pusē? Kur ir tā robeža, kas viņus nošķir? Par tām rokām. Tās nav tādas abstraktas rokas, bet gan konkrētu cilvēku rokas, kas šo mugurkaulu satur kopā. Vai tu atšifrēsi nedaudz? Rokas es izvēlējos, jo tās aug no sirds. Ja skatāmies uz to anatomiski, tās ir kā mūsu dvēseles antenas, un visus darbus, ko darām, mēs darām ar rokām. Cilvēki, kuru rokas es izvēlējos, ir ļoti konkrēti. Apakšā šo skulptūru satur kopā tāds kā kodols, saknes. Apakšā ir vecajie, gudrajie, kas ir mana mammīte un augstskolas profesors. Tālāk seko mūsu aizstāvji, sarga ukraiņu karavīru rokas, un tālāk uz augšu: vīrs un es, un mani dēli, jaunas sievietes rokas ar cerību uz nākotni pie jaunākiem bērniem, un pašā augšgalā – desmitgadīga puikas rokas, kas ir skats uz nākotni, vērsts uz visu jauno. Ar cerību. Vairāk – ierakstā. ***
De los duelos América vs Cruz Azul y Rayados vs Atlético San Luis, saldrá el campeón del Apertura 2024. Checo Pérez en duda con Red Bull en Fórmula 1. Definidos los equipos que jugarán la MLS Cup. La selección mexicana femenil ganó a Costa Rica y enfrenta a Panamá. Botafogo ganó la Copa Libertadores. Mientras se sigue esperando por la firma de Juan Soto otros agentes libres despiertan el interés del mercado. Analizamos la semana 13 de la NFL. ¿Ha crecido la selección de Guatemala con Luis Fernando Tena? Es cumpleaños de Mónica Seles.
We have professional astrologer, author and WTA superfan Lars Mellis (@lars_stars) on the pod! What do our favorite WTA stars' charts say about their games? And what on-court moments come to mind when we dive in? Find out in one of our favorite episodes ever. We use their charts as a jumping off point to talk about our favorite WTA stars:Serena WilliamsVenus WilliamsMonica Seles (!) Danielle Collins Lars crushes it in every way, including giving a detailed reading for each WTA queen. Learn more about him and get your very own reading here: https://www.larsstars.com/. You won't regret it! You can also follow him on IG @lars_stars or @larsmellis. And don't forget to get his NEW BOOK, Your Personal Horoscope 2025!Get more from The Gay Tennis Podcast on Twitter and Instagram! And if you're enjoying the pod, please rate and review. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, Shawn and Craig are joined by special guest Kevin, who brings a unique spotlight with Amanaz's album "Africa." Kevin delves into the rich, psychedelic rock sounds of this Zambian gem, one of the cornerstone albums of an obscure genre known as Zamrock. He explores how "Africa" captures the vibrant musical landscape of 1970s Zambia and its enduring influence on global music enthusiasts.Shawn follows with a spotlight on "Butterflies Don't Go Away," a compilation from Majesty Crush curated by Numero Records. He examines the band's dreamy, shoegaze sound and the compilation's ability to capture their essence through tracks like "Uma”, “Seles”, “No. 1 Fan" and "Sunny Pie." Craig wraps up the episode by diving into The The's "Mind Bomb," highlighting Matt Johnson's dark, introspective lyrics and the albums' innovative blend of rock and electronic elements. He spotlights the guitar work of Johnny Marr, as well as one of his favorite standout songs, a duet with Sinead O'Connor called "Kingdom of Rain", reflecting on the album's profound impact. Join Shawn, Craig, and Kevin as they explore these hidden gems, offering deep insights and appreciation for these diverse and influential albums.
Pirmoreiz Rīgā šovakar, 9. maijā, uzstāsies amerikāņu laikmetīgās mūzikas leģenda – komponiste un dziedātāja Meredita Monka (Meredith Monk). Jau gandrīz sešdesmit gadu viņa paplašina izpratni par cilvēka balss iespējām un ar savām nepieradinātajām performancēm iedvesmojusi vairākas mākslinieku paaudzes no Bjorkas un Keitas Bušas līdz Misijai Macoli. Mereditai Monkai balss ir instruments, valoda un dvēseles ziņnesis. „Ir tiešām lieliski beidzot būt Latvijā,” amerikāniskā sirsnībā saka Meredita Monka, kad mazā žurnālistu lokā tiekamies kādā Vecrīgas viesnīcā. Monka divreiz koncertējusi Lietuvā, bet Rīgā ir pirmoreiz. Viņa smejas, ka savulaik veikusi ģenētisko testu, un mātes līnija vedot tieši uz šejieni. Monkai ir 81 gads, viņai ir divas garas, tumšas bizes, smalks augums, rotaļīgas balonveida bikses, garšīgi smiekli un ļoti enerģiska balss. Viņu mēdz dēvēt par cilvēka balss arheoloģi. Viņa to pēta pati caur sevi un pārvērš mākslā, kā to iepriekš neviens nav darījis. Meredita Monka savās dziesmās praktiski nekad neizmanto vārdus, jo balss viņai ir valoda pati par sevi. Tajā var izteikt sajūtas, ko nevar ietērpt vārdos. Rīgā Meredita Monka uzstāsies „Hanzas peronā”. Kā tur skanēs viņas neparastā balss saspēlē ar Džona Holenbeka perkusijām, klausītāji uzzinās koncertā šovakar.
Graf, Navratilova, Seles, Serena, Hingis... Jennifer Capriati not only competed with the game's greats, she beat them. It was an unconventional path. From youth prodigy to tennis survivor, Capriati put herself back in slam contention in 2003 when she met Justine Henin in an all-time classic semifinal under the lights at Arthur Ashe. Sick of hearing all the ads? Subscribe to Soda Premium on Apple Podcasts to get rid of them! Come join the Patreon family for bonus content, access to the exclusive discord server and ad free episodes. Follow @OpenEraPod on Twitter! While you're there say hello to @DesaiDevang or reach out to the show and say hey: podcast@openera.ca If merch is your thing, be sure to check out the store. If you enjoyed today's show, please rate Open Era 5-Stars on Apple Podcasts.
Esta semana revivimos uno de los hechos más terribles en la historia de los deportes. En abril de 1993, un hombre agredía a la entonces número 1 del tenis femenino, la yugoslava Mónica Seles. Muchas pistas apuntaban a que existía un trasfondo político en todo ese incidente pero... ¿Qué fue lo que en realidad sucedió?
Esta semana revivimos uno de los hechos más terribles en la historia de los deportes. En abril de 1993, un hombre agredía a la entonces número 1 del tenis femenino, la yugoslava Mónica Seles. Muchas pistas apuntaban a que existía un trasfondo político en todo ese incidente pero… ¿Qué fue lo que en realidad sucedió?
"Dvēseles attīrīšanas iekārta" ir komponistes Anna Fišeres jaundarbs, radīts avangarda mūzikas festivālam “Skaņu mežs”. Kultūras nondo saruna ar komponisti Annu Fišeri un festivāla radošo direktoru Rihardu Endriksonu. Komponiste Anna Fišere, mākslinieks Miķelis Fišers un rakstnieks Andris Kalnozols radījuši darbu "Dvēseles attīrīšanas iekārta", kas savu pirmizrādi piedzīvos avangarda mūzikas festivāla "Skaņu mežs" koncertā 8. oktobrī kultūrvietā "Hanzas perons". "Dvēseles attīrīšanas iekārta" sevī ietver skaņu instalācijas, kinētiskas skulptūras, performanču mākslas, laikmetīgās kompozīcijas un uzveduma elementus, taču tā veidotāji uzsver, ka tas ir definējams citādāk: "Nevis izrāde, nevis kaut kas cits, bet tieši pneimoterapijas kurss!" Pirmie darba aizmetņi radās Annas un Miķeļa Fišeru šogad aizvadītajās meistarklasēs bērniem un jauniešiem Rīgā, Liepājā un Trumsē. Vairāki no Rīgā un Liepājā sastaptajiem bērniem piedalīsies arī šajā pasākumā. Autori uzsver, ka darba radīšanas laikā domājuši par bērniem kā par "vienlīdzīgiem radījumiem", un tas ir paredzēts visdažādāko vecumu klausītājiem. Darbs tiks prezentēts "Skaņu meža" koncertvakarā, kas veltīts projektam "LYRA" - tā sākums būs 13:00, un priekšnesumus sniegs arī norvēģu ģitārists un dziedātājs Stiāns Vesterhuss (Stian Westerhus), afrikāņu-portugāļu deju mūzikas producente Nídia, grieķu eksperimentālā popmūziķe Evita Mandži (Evita Manji), komponists Pēters Ablingers (Peter Ablinger) un perkusioniste Silvija Zitinska (Sylwia Zytynska), kā skaņu mākslinieks Aleksandrs Rishaugs (Alexander Rishaug) un vizuālā māksliniece Ingrīda Bjornali (Ingrid Bjørnaali). Koncerta apmeklējums ir bezmaksas.
Cilvēces norietā sāksim spriest par gaidāmo un nenovēršamo bišu apvērsumu, kur tām ir vieta kosmosā un kur - galda spēļu laukumā. Runa, protams, par Apiary. Svaigs un Gards Kristaps un Toms izmantos dažādas metodes kā gatavoties aizsardzībai pret bišu dumpi. Kristaps ņems pieredzi no Otrā pasaules kara un ātras cīņas Blitzkrieg! Savukārt, Toms vāks labāko iespējamo rūķu komandu iekš Nidavellir. Svarīgi izrunāt arī labāko stratēģiju, tāpēc atgriežam segmentu Stiķis, kurā Kristaps pārrunās, kā vislabāk saglabāt kontroli, vadību un galu galā iegūt uzvaru reģionu kontroles spēlēs. Gaidāmais un nenovēršamais kukaiņu apvērsums turpina iekrāsot dienas un domas drēgnos toņos, tāpēc šodien Kreisajā tokenā parādās jauns segments - Negatīvie ņaupji. Tajā Toms stāstīs par lietām, kas viņu tracina galdaspeļu industrijā. Šoreiz par spēlēm, kur visa kā ir par daudz un bez jēgas. Bezgalīgajā duelī būs maza deva sentimenta, jo šoreiz būs jāsalīdzina trīs spēles un jānosaka, kura no tām ir vecākā, vidējā un jaunākā. Toties Kreisais top 5 noslēgumā par neko citu kā bezdvēselīgu ceļošanu pa sausajiem eiro jeb Pa Eiropu bez dvēseles! Klausies epizodi - https://anchor.fm/kreisais-tokens Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/search/Kreisais%20tokens Seko mums: Instragram - https://www.instagram.com/kreisaistokens/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/Kreisais-Tokens-108903727367874
Trente ans après, l'événement dépasse toujours l'entendement. Le 30 avril 1993, en plein match, Monica Seles, 19 ans, recevait un coup de couteau dans le dos. Victime d'un déséquilibré, la déjà lauréate de 8 titres du Grand chelem voyait alors son irrésistible domination stoppée. Longtemps dans l'incapacité de surmonter le traumatisme, Seles ne serait plus jamais la même.Ecrit par Maxime DUPUISRaconté par Florian BAYOUXMonté par Jean-Gabriel RASSATProduit par BABABAMVous aimez Les Grands Récits ? Abonnez-vous sur Apple Podcasts et soyez alerté lors de la publication des nouveaux épisodes chaque semaine. Ecoutez d'autres épisodes des Grands Récits : Perdu sur les parquets, disparu dans les abysses : la vie et la fin tragiques de Bison DeleKen Norton, l'homme qui a brisé la mâchoire d'AliSurvivant du Titanic et roi de l'US Open, le destin pas commun de Dick WilliamsDaniel Elena, le roi d'à côtéEverton - Liverpool, le faux derby de l'amitié Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.
Latvijas Universitātes Botāniskajā dārzā 23. jūlijā plkst. 17 notiks franču opermūzikas koncerts "Lui et Elle ENCORE – franču operas zelta periods", kurā piedalīsies Anta Jankovska (soprāns), Irma Pavāre (mecosoprāns), Artjoms Safronovs (tenors), Nauris Indzeris (baritons), Edgars Ošleja (bass), Ilona Meija (flauta), Pēteris Eduards Kalniņš (klarnete), Liene Neija-Kalniņa un Konstantīns Paturskis (vijole), Ivars Bezprozvanovs (čells), Helēna Laukmane (klavieres). Koncertu vadīs Liene Jakovļeva. Šī koncerta rīkotāji - klasiskās mūzikas ģilde Euterpe - 2021. gada 1. augustā LU Botāniskā dārza flokšu pļavā īstenoja pirmo franču opermūzikas koncertu Lui & Elle. Nu tapis turpinājums ar jaunu programmu, kurai aranžijas veidojusi komponiste Marina Vidmonte. Par franču mūzikas un Botāniskā dārza saderību, Latvijā mazatskaņotiem darbiem, pianista būšanu diriģenta lomā un komponista ego nolikšanu malā, cita skaņraža darbam pieskaroties, - sarunā ar pianisti Helēnu Laukmani, komponisti Marinu Vidmonti un dziedātāju Antu Jankovsku, kura atzīst, ka "franču mūzika ir ļoti intīma un ļoti smalka, un ir jāmāk un jāprot tai pieiet no pareizās puses". Helēna Laukmane: Ļoti interesanti, ka ansamblī spēlē cilvēki, ar kuriem esmu pazīstami ļoti ilgi - kopš saviem tīņa gadiem, un tāpat arī tādi, ar kuriem iepazinos burtiski pirms pāris dienām. Bet sajūta ir, ka esam satikušies tie, kuri saprot viens otru muzikāli. Nav rīvēšanās un domstarpību par kopējo elpu. Izklausās pēc dvēseles projekta. Helēna Laukmane: Protams, tā noteikti ir. Speciāli šim koncertam ir darinājuši itāļu komponists Enriko Dzullino un Marina Vidmonte. Kādas aranžijas veidojāt? Marina Vidmonte: Tās ir franču operas. Visvairāk esmu strādājusi pie Žila Masnē operas „Taīda”, Žorža Bizē „Karmenas” un Šarla Guno „Fausta”. Tās ir pamatvērtības, kuras esmu atklājusi priekš sevis. Varu piekrist, ka šis ir dvēseles projekts. Šajās operās un ārijās, kuras darināju, mani saistīja tieši intimitāte, kodols. Tas liekas šaurs, bet spēj izaugt līdz grandiziotātei – tas ārkārtīgi pārsteidz. Tie milzīgie kontrasti, kas nāk no mazas sēkliņas un ar instrumentācijas palīdzību izaug līdz kaut kam tik varenam un dvēseli saviļņojošam. Priekš manis tas ir milzīgs atklājums. Sākumā likās, ka arī milzīgs izaicinājums, kad man lūdza pārlikt orķestra lielās partitūras uz tik mazu sastāvu. Izaicinājums ir tajā, ka lielajā partitūrā ir vairāk, nekā tu vari atļauties. Mans pirmais uzdevums bija saglabāt to autentiskumu, ko autors ir iecerējis, un tieši tādā veidā, kāds tas ir. Un nodot klausītājam tās emocijas, ko autors pirmsākumā ir ielicis. Preses relīzē teikts, ka tās būs franču operas zelta laikmeta ārijas. Tās būs cilvēkiem jau zināmās vai tomēr pārsteigsiet ar kādu noslēpumu? AJ: Tas ir periods, kurā savus ģeniālos darbus rakstīja Masnē, Guno, Bizē, Sensānss. Ir daži darbi, kuri bieži tiek atskaņoti un visiem ir zināmi, bet mums būs „gan, gan”. Mums vairāk patīk iepazīt jaunas lietas, un klausītājam vienmēr vajadzīgs dot kaut ko no tā, ko viņš jau zina, un kaut ko no jaunā. Būs arī dažas pērles, kuras tiešām jāzina, jāklausās un jāiepazīst, piemēram, „Taīda”, tāpat arī rets un nedzirdēts duets no Tomā „Minjonas” basam un mecosoprānam ļoti interesantā salikumā. Tāpat arī absolūti nedzirdēta ārija no Bizē operas „Džamile”, kuru neviens, manuprāt, nezina, bet tā ir ļoti skaista. Vēl arī Guno „Safo”. Būs no visa mazdrusciņ. HL: Un katrs instrumentālists būs arī kā solists – vijole, flauta, klarnete, čells. Katrs atskaņos arī kādu solo.
durée : 00:02:38 - Esprit sport - Il y a un peu plus de trente ans, Monica Seles se faisait poignarder en plein tournoi en Allemagne par un déséquilibré. Retour en plein début de Wimbledon, qu'elle n'a jamais remporté, sur ce choc avec David Rochefort, auteur du livre « le prix fort ».
Kokles "Dvēseles stīgas" izstādē Etnogrāfiskajā brīvdabas muzejā, Pasaules koklētāju saietā meistarklasēs un koncertos. Bet Kultūras rondo tiekamies ar koklētāju Laimu Jansoni un izstādes autori Etnogrāfiskā brīvdabas muzeja Izglītības un informācijas nodaļas vadītāju Rozīti Katrīnu Spīču. Sasaucoties ar Dziesmu un deju svētku tradīcijas 150. gadadienu, Latvijas Etnogrāfiskajā brīvdabas muzejā no 29. jūnija skatāma kokles būves attīstībai veltīta izstāde “Dvēseles stīgas”. Izstādes norises laikā notiks arī kokles spēles meistarklases ar Laimu Jansoni un Zani Sniķeri, sarunas ar kokļu meistariem un citi koklei veltīti pasākumi. Kokle ir latviešu tautasdziesmās visvairāk apdziedātais tautas mūzikas instruments. No Latvijas Etnogrāfiskā brīvdabas muzeja 282 krājumā esošajiem mūzikas instrumentiem 64 ir kokles. Izstādē būs apskatāma kokles būvniecības vēsture Latvijas teritorijā no 19. līdz 20. gadsimtam, pētot tās vietu vispirms latviešu zemnieka sētā, tad skatot 20. gadsimta tradīcijas, un izstādes tematisko apskatu noslēdzot ar tradicionālās kokles attīstības tendencēm mūsdienās. Īpaša vieta izstādē būs koklētājam – cilvēkam, kurš caur kokles stīgu vibrāciju atklāj daļu savas dvēseles. Izstādē būs apskatāmas arī intervijas ar jaunajiem tradicionālās kokles koklētājiem un tradīcijas turpinātājiem par viņu ceļu senās kokles pasaulē un to, kāpēc viņi izvēlējušies spēlēt kokli arī 21.gadsimtā. Izstādes autore Latvijas Etnogrāfiskā brīvdabas muzeja Izglītības un informācijas nodaļas vadītāja Mg. art. Rozīte Katrīna Spīča.
The actions of Gunter Parche changed the sport of tennis for ever on April 30, 1993. Monica Seles was on track to smash the record books until Parche, a Steffi Graf superfan, stabbed Seles during a changeover at the Hamburg tournament. Graf and Seles were lodged in a rivalry that was on track to redefine the sport. Seles remarkably came all the way back, meeting her great rival once again in the 1995 US Open Final. Sick of hearing all the ads? Subscribe to Soda Premium on Apple Podcasts to get rid of them! Come join the Patreon family for bonus content, access to the exclusive discord server and ad free episodes: Follow @OpenEraPod on Twitter! While you're there say hello to @DesaiDevang or reach out to the show and say hey: podcast@openera.ca If merch is your thing, be sure to check out the store.If you enjoyed today's show, please rate Open Era 5-Stars on Apple Podcasts.This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/4188908/advertisement
Chrissi und Oli haben ja schon oft bewiesen, dass sie ernsthafte Themen auch ernsthaft besprechen können...das ist diesmal nicht der Fall! Viel Spaß bei der Folge!
Fede nos cuenta la historia del día en que apuñalaron a Mónica Seles en un partido de tenis trágico que terminó con su estabilidad mental y su carrera
En el capítulo de esta semana, y con la colaboración de Cecilia Biurrún; terminamos nuestra covertura del 24° BAFICI. El festival tuvo lugar del 19 de abril al 1 de mayo en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires y se exhibieron más de 250 películas. En el podcast encontrarás nuestras reseñas de las siguientes peliculas: Taurus (Tim Sutton, 2022), Los Convencidos (Martín Farina, 2023), Arturo a los 30 (Martín Shanly, 2023) y Terminal Young (Lucía Seles, 2023). Redes de Cecilia: instagram.com/cecibiurrun Podés ayudarnos a financiar nuestra próxima película :) https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/krakenfilmsco/whiskey-vodka-and-cannoli-a-dark-comedy-feature-film?ref=6ux4fu
È il 30 aprile del 1993 e siamo ad Amburgo, dove Monica Seles, la tennista n. 1 al mondo sta giocando contro la bulgara Magdalena Maleeva. Durante un cambio campo succede qualcosa che cambia la storia: un uomo accoltella Monica Seles. Qualcuno pensa a un movente politico, si scoprirà invece che il gesto nasce dall'ossessione del tedesco per Steffi Graf, la tennista a cui Monica Seles aveva sottratto il primato in classifica. Dopo quell'attentato, la Seles non sarà mai più la stessa, e forse nemmeno il tennis. I contributi audio di questo episodio sono tratti dall'audio originale della partita Seles-Maleeva del 30 aprile 1993, dalla telecronaca della tv francese della finale del torneo di Parigi 1990 Seles-Graf, dall'intervista a Monica Seles realizzata dalla tv americana Abc. Tutti i frammenti sono disponibili su YouTube Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Welcome to the Aphasia Access Aphasia Conversations Podcast. I'm Ellen Bernstein-Ellis, Program Specialist and Director Emeritus for the Aphasia Treatment Program at Cal State East Bay and a member of the Aphasia Access Podcast Working Group. AA strives to provide members with information, inspiration, and ideas that support their aphasia care through a variety of educational materials and resources. I'm today's host for an episode that will feature Davetrina Seles Gadson. We'll discuss her work involving how brain lesion characteristics may intersect with aphasia recovery, race, and psychosocial factors, as well as issues involving health-related quality of life assessments. Dr. Davetrina Seles Gadson is the first Black-American to graduate with a Ph.D. in Communication Sciences and Disorders from the University of Georgia. She is a neuroscientist and certified speech-language pathologist with expertise in adult neurological rehabilitation and patient-centered outcomes. She currently is Research Faculty, in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, at Georgetown University. Dr. Gadson's research focuses on the influence of health disparities in minority stroke survivors with aphasia and the effect of such disparities on brain functioning, aphasia severity, and health-related quality of life. Most rewardingly Dr. Gadson is the co-host of “Brain Friends”, a podcast for neuro nerds and stroke survivors to talk about aphasia advocacy, language recovery, and community. Listener Take-aways In today's episode you will: Learn how health disparities may influence aphasia outcomes and why more research is needed Discover why "Brain Friends" is another podcast you'll want to add to your playlist. Gain practical tips on how to build confidence in intercultural interactions with your clients Hear how health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures can help inform your clinical practice We'd like to recognize Kasey Trebilcock & Amanda Zalucki, students in the Strong Story Lab at CMU, for their assistance with this transcript. Show notes edited for conciseness Ellen Bernstein-Ellis (EBE) EBE: I am so excited to have a fellow podcaster here today. Thank you for being here. And I just listened to the January Brain Friend's episode. It was great. So I hope our listeners will check it out too. I want to also give a shout out to your consumer stakeholder and co-podcaster, Angie Cauthorn, because she was a featured guest on episode 70, in June of 2021, as we recognized Aphasia Awareness Month, and you just spoke with her about aphasia types and aphasia conferences, and you gave a big shout out to CAC and you gave clinical aphasiology conference and you also gave a big shout out to the Aphasia Access Leadership Summit. So really important conferences, I think that stimulate a lot of discussion and values around patient centered care. And your Brain Friends podcast just has a great backstory. So why don't we just share about how that all started? Where's the backstory to that, Davetrina? DAVETRINA SELES GADSON: Thank you so much for having me. This is such an exciting opportunity. So, Brain Friends started with myself and Angie. We were on the National Aphasia Association's Black Aphasia group call and I just loved her energy. She reached out to me after we finished that group call, and we just started talking. Our conversations were so informative, and it just lit this passion and excitement in me. I said, “Hey, can I record some of these, and maybe we do like a podcast?”, and she was totally down for it. It's just been such an innovative and fun way to disseminate science and engage many stakeholders. EBE: I want to thank Darlene Williamson, who's president of the National Aphasia Association for sending me a little more information. You told me about this group, and so I wanted to find out more. She provided this description by Michael Obel-Omia and his wife Carolyn, and I hope I said his name correctly, who provide leadership to this group. And they said that in this group, the Black American Aphasia Conversation group, “provides a place for Black people with aphasia to share their stories, provide support, meditation, and brainstorm ways to advocate and consider policies. We will discuss the unique challenges and gifts we share due to our experiences with disability and race.” I found out that you can reach out to the National Aphasia Association (NAA) for more information and to get on the email list for a meeting notifications. And in fact, I put the registration link in our show notes today. So, sounds like that group has been a meaningful discussion forum for you, too. SELES GADSON: It's been so fun. I share how for me, I've been in the field practicing for a little over 16 years now, and this was my first time being in a room with so many people that look like me. And for many of the survivors on the call, I was one of their first Black SLPs that they had ever met. Just even having that connection, and being able to speak to some of the challenges, and some of the things culturally that we both share has been my outlet, biweekly. EBE: I'm going to make sure we have that link in our show notes. Also, the link to your podcast because I encourage people to listen to Brain Friends, I've really enjoyed it. When you and I were planning for this episode today, you talked about how being part of the National Aphasia Association's Black American Aphasia Group really helped to energize you and the research you were doing, and what a nice integration of life that was. I will want to tell our listeners about one more wonderful thing, and that's the interview you were part of on the ASHA Voices podcast as well as the related article in the ASHA leader, where I learned more about your journey to doing this research. So, as you provided clinical services for a Black client as an outpatient clinician, and this is pre- doctoral research, you recognized that there was a significant gap in the literature around working with African Americans with aphasia. You saw the need to understand the impact of aphasia on identity and motivation in order to best help this particular client. And those are both really important concepts within the Life-Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA) framework as well. So, then you shared that you got some important advice from an important mentor. Do you want to share what happened next? SELES GADSON: Definitely. So, one thing that's also unique about that time is that at that point in my career, I had worked in many of the clinical settings. I had done acute care, inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility, and even worked as a travel SLP traveling throughout the United States. And so, once I had got to that outpatient setting, it was different from any of the other settings because these individuals were home. And often times, they wanted to get back to work. I remember feeling a little discouraged because I wasn't finding research on a lot of functional treatment approaches or functional therapy. In addition, I wasn't finding research on black stroke survivors with aphasia. And so, I mentioned to one of my mentors at the time, Dr. Paul Rao. I said, “what's going on in the field? And I'm not seeing this, and I have this client, and I don't really know what to do.” And he said to me, “Stop complaining kiddo, and go back and get your PhD.” Admittedly, when he said it, it was kind of like, “okay fine, I'll go do it.” I don't think I realized all what it would take. That's what really made me pursue the degree was this notion that I could help facilitate some of that change and bring some of the research that I needed to see. EBE: That is so important. And that story really made me reflect on another story that has really impacted me from a dear colleague, because you experienced in your doctoral work some concerns about doing research on Black Americans because your interest was seen, as it said in I think the ASHA Voices interview or in the Leader, as “personally motivated.” Your story mirrors one that a colleague and dear friend, Nidhi Mahindra, told me as well. During her doctoral research, she was told that while pursuing multicultural interests were worthy, that she may face barriers to getting funding to pursue that line of work. That might be problematic, right? She had to struggle with that. Despite that daunting message, she persisted, and then was funded by ASHA on a grant studying barriers influencing minority clients' access to speech pathology and audiology. Nidhi reminded me how our life experiences can often inform our work in important and valuable ways. Davetrina, you've channeled your experiences into these explicit observations and data that you shared with your doctoral committee. That was a really important part of moving forward. Do you want to share some of the points gathered for that doctoral committee to help support why this research is so important? SELES GADSON: First, I want to thank Nidhi. Hopefully I'm pronouncing her name right, for her perseverance, because it was some of her work that helped me in my dissertation. Being able to cite her just really shows the importance that everybody plays in breaking barriers and pursuing the things that really speak to them. And one of the things that I'll clarify, it was two parts in pleading this case. The first part was that I changed the committee. I think that that was a supportive thing. And then, the second part was that when I prepared all of the research on why I needed to do this work. Some of the research looked at what we knew already with stroke recovery in minoritized groups, which was that Black African Americans were twice as likely to have a recurrent stroke than any other ethnic group and what we were seeing in the aphasia literature for Black Americans, which was the narrative of Black Americans having longer hospital stays, more hospital costs, but poor functional outcomes. And so, it was these two key pieces that I had really gathered. When I went back to the new committee to share and plead my case on why I really wanted to do this research, they had that initial onset of knowing that this research definitely needs to be done. I think that that's what helped it go through. EBE: Wow. I think those are really important reasons. That whole concept of allowing our life experiences to inform our work and to value that. As we start to talk about your research, and I'm really excited to get to share this amazing work you're doing, I thought it might be helpful to define some of the terms that are integral to this research Some of the definitions are a little tough to wrap your arms around because they're not consistent in the literature or are still waiting to develop. Let's start by discussing what you want the listeners to know about the definition for health-related quality of life, or, as we'll call it, HRQL. SELES GADSON: HRQL is operationally defined that it's multi-dimensional. The way I define it a lot in my work is the perception of the individual's ability to lead a fulfilling life in the presence of a chronic disease or disability such as aphasia, but really their perception in five domains. The five domains that I look at in my work are physical, mental, emotional, social communication, and then role, the individual's ability to get back into the activities that they used to be able to do. EBE: Okay, that's really helpful. I think we should also discuss or define patient-reported outcomes or PROs. Sometimes they are also referred to as PROM's, patient-reported outcome measurements. How do they relate to HRQLs? SELES GADSON: Patient-reported outcomes is a health outcome directly reported by the patient without interpretation. Patient-reported outcomes often look at the status of the health condition. The biggest thing about patient-reported outcomes is that it's without the interpretation of the practitioner. So, whatever the patient says is what we're going to take as gold. EBE: Why is it particularly important then to look at HRQOL for Black stroke survivors? SELES GADSON: That's such a great question. And so I want to break it down in two parts. I think the first part is that given the lack of normative data for Black stroke survivors, when we're only looking at clinician-reported outcomes, that's where we get to this bias and the normative bias. I know that there's research out where there are some outcomes to where we're already seeing this five-point difference. And for some research, that five-point difference is considered clinically meaningful. I think that if we're not using these patient-reported reported outcomes, then we put ourselves in a position to contribute to the disparities that we're seeing in standardized assessments. So that's the first answer. The second reason is that we know that nonclinical factors such as physician-race concordance drive up to 80% of what we're seeing in poor functional outcomes in minoritized groups. If we're not asking the person, then we're not able to really understand the things that they want to do, and we're already coming in with this majority type attitude which could influence one's participation in therapy. The last thing that I think is most important, whether you're Black, white, purple, whatever, is that we have these insurance demands that sometimes may not allow us to get to all the things that we may see from an impairment base. By using the patient-reported outcomes, we are helping structure therapy in ways that matter most to the patient. EBE: Well, that reminds me of this amazing quote that I was hoping I could work in today. I circled it in big yellow pen when I first read through your research. You said that it's really important because, due to the lower HRQL that we find in individuals with aphasia, it's “imperative that the development of a treatment plan incorporates what the patient prioritizes. And it's imperative that clinicians have a way to measure these subjective attributes to make a meaningful impact on care.” That's what we want to do. SELES GADSON: So important, because I think what we have to realize is that part of our role as the practitioners providing this skilled intervention, is really helping the individual get back to what they want to do. And I think that if we're not asking them what they want to do, then we're not really able to structure therapy in matters that mean the most to them, but also help them to start to recognize that as part of this identity with aphasia, that there's this new normal for them. Sometimes, individuals are going to rate themselves based off of what they used to be able to do. But if they know that one of their goals was to be able to talk on the phone, or to play bridge with their friends, and we worked on that in therapy, they're now able to look and see, before I scored my telephone confidence at a 50. Now I feel like I'm at a 90, and so sometimes that own self-recognition can support motivation, and can even support therapy, once insurance dollars run out. EBE: I really appreciated doing this deeper dive into PROs as I read through some of your research. And one of the resources I came across was a really interesting table that talked about six categories of PROs. And I'll put a link in the show notes to a 2015 book by Cella, Hahn, Jensen and colleagues called “Patient-Reported Outcomes and Performance Measurement.” (They list six different kinds of PROs in a helpful table.) But the main category that your work is utilizing is actually these HRQL measures. You've been stating why it's so important. HRQL PROs help to frame diagnostics and treatment because you're trying to prioritize what the patient wants and needs-- what they're expressing. SELES GADSON: Right, exactly. I think that one of the things that it's really important for practitioners to understand, is that these things are mandated by what we see in our scope of practice. When I say mandated, I mean we are called to reduce the cost of care by designing and implementing treatment that focuses on helping the individual. If we're not asking the individual what they want to get back to, then I think that we're putting ourself at a position that makes it more challenging to serve in that way. EBE: One of the things we like to do on this podcast is to provide resources that will help clinicians think differently or do something differently tomorrow as they meet face-to-face with their clients. And one of the things I thought we'd put in our show notes is a link to the PROMIS website, because that was something you've used in your research. Do you want to explain a little bit about that website? SELES GADSON: One of the things that I like about the PROMIS website is that it has a list of health outcomes available to use for a range of individuals-- for pediatrics, for adults. I like that it's free, most of them, and I think that it's a good place to start. Some of the outcomes on that website are also even appropriate for in acute care, meaning that they may not take a long time to administer. And so, I think that that's a good place to start. EBE: Well, thank you. And I want to move right into this wonderful paper where you are co-author with Wesley, van der Stelt, Lacey, DeMarco, Snider, & Turkeltaub, that looked at how brain lesion location interacts with HRQL. Can you share a couple key takeaways from that paper? I hope you'll highlight the one related to depression and HRQL. We're having a lot of research right now around the emotional impact of aphasia and how that will impact recovery outcomes as well. So, tell us a little bit more about that work. SELES GADSON: We looked at the domains of health-related quality of life associated with specific deficits and lesion locations in chronic aphasia. We examined the relationship between HRQL using the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale by Hilari and her colleagues, as well as a depression scale, and different impairment-based measures---our battery that we used here. What we found was that language production and depression predicted communication HRQL, meaning that those individuals that reported lower communication HRQL also had a significant depression associated with it. We did lesion symptom mapping in this study. Basically, what we were looking at is to see if HRQL mapped on to discrete areas of the brain. We found that individuals that reported lower psychosocial HRQL had inferior frontal and anterior insula lesions; where individuals who reported lower physical HRQL had lesions in the basal ganglia. This confirmed for us that even though HRQL is this subjective perception, we were seeing it map on to these very specific areas in the brain that also predicted some of the impairment measures that we know of. EBE: That can get us to start thinking about if we have patients with these types of lesions, maybe to be more on the alert for depression. I think that's one point you made. But you also mentioned another important takeaway in the study about the impact of depression on HRQL related to the training of SLPs. This all ties together. What are your thoughts there? SELES GADSON: I think that when we are recognizing that individuals with aphasia are experiencing a new normal, and I think that the research has been very clear on understanding that depression does relate to and contribute to one's communication. I think that there is an opportunity for speech-language pathologists to have more counseling classes. And again, make sure that we're tapping into what the patient wants to do in order to hopefully help mitigate some of those feelings of depression. EBE: I really endorse building those counseling skills in our graduate programs for our students, so they go out feeling more confident and more skilled and knowing that that is going to be an ongoing journey as a speech-language pathologist to build that skill set. SELES GADSON: And shameless plug, I think our episode six of Brain Friends is a mental health episode. I have one of my good girlfriend colleagues there who is a counseling psychologist. She shares with us helping skills for the practitioner, and we share on that episode10 skills that you can do as a clinician to support the person with aphasia. EBE: Thank you for sharing that. That's really important. And again, the link to Brain Friends will be in our show notes. Let's take a moment and talk about how you connect this finding about depression to the role of social communication, because you said it was those scores that were down in your measure. SELES GADSON: With that particular study or overall? EBE: However you'd like to discuss it. I'm opening that door to you. SELES GADSON: One of the things that we were seeing is that individuals were reporting the depression within this Communication HRQL domain. So even though we didn't dive into it too deep in this study, it was more of the correlation and recognizing that individuals that were reporting this higher level of depression, also have this higher level, or this lower report of communication HRQL, making those links specifically. I do have something that I'm working on right now, that will completely answer that question a little bit more solidly. I don't want to speak too much on this, so stay tuned. EBE: Absolutely staying tuned, there's no question. You also had another article that I found intriguing-- An article with your coauthors, Wallace, Young, Vail, and Finn, a 2021 article that examined the relationship between HRQL, perceived social support, and social network size in Black Americans with aphasia. And that paper highlights that there's been little research exploring HRQL in Black Americans. Of the five factors that comprise HRQL, why did you decide to focus on social functioning? And specifically social support and social network in this study? SELES GADSON: Well, that really came from the literature. One of the things that the literature said is that we knew that social HRQL contributed in some way, but we weren't sure what way. And we weren't sure what pieces of social functioning contributed. My apologies to the researcher who said it, but it set me up perfect for my dissertation work to say, “this is why I'm looking at social functioning in these two specific pieces,” because we didn't know. Was it social participation? Was it social network? Was it social support? That was one of the reasons why I wanted to pull out those two specific pieces. The other thing that was really important about this work was that it was the first study that really looked at what HRQL looked like in Black stroke survivors. We didn't know any of that. And so for me, it was really important to compare Black stroke survivors to normal aging Black individuals because I feel that for us to really get baseline understanding of what some of these factors are and how individuals respond in recovery, we have to compare them to their norm, or to other members in their community that look like them before comparing between Black and white or any other ethnic groups. This study is where we found that in terms of HRQL, the main difference between stroke survivors with and without aphasia and in our normal aging individuals, was that communication was the impairment. And then, with the social network and social support, we weren't seeing a difference between this homogenous group of Black people in those areas. EBE: That takes me to my next question, your research noted that the Black survivors with and without aphasia, have smaller social networks compared to white stroke survivors. That's the data that we have based on that social network data. Even though you weren't trying to compare in this study, per se, you still made sense of that finding-- trying to make sure that we don't make assumptions, and instead look at different factors that could be at play. How did you make sense of that finding, the smaller network? SELES GADSON: It was two things that allowed us to make sense of that finding. One was recognizing that in both groups, the stroke survivors with aphasia and our normal aging individuals, that because they were age matched, it could have been a factor of age--meaning that the individuals receiving the support quality and then their network, everyone was kind of in the same age group, and so, it was more of a factor of time of life versus actual culture. But then a lot of that came through in some of the anecdotal reports, and things that we even circled on the scale that we used--we use the Lubben Social Network Scale. With some of those questions, one might be how many people do you feel comfortable sharing personal details with? And often times, we got this report of “just my husband”, or “only God”. And so, we were seeing that some of this really related to the traditional and cultural values in Black Americans, where you're not going to share a lot of stuff with a lot of people. You have your set group, your small network. And that's okay. That doesn't mean that you're isolated. EBE: I think another point you make, and maybe even thinking back to the ASHA Voices Podcast, why it's particularly important to target social communication. That is yet another life participation core concept. Do you want to speak to that for a moment? SELES GADSON: I think the thing that we have to realize with social communication is that individuals, especially within the black community, they are social, they want to talk, they want to get back to doing and interacting with their community. And so, one of the things that that looks like is maybe being able to participate again in Bible study or being able to stand up and read a scripture. And the only way that you know that, is by asking them that on a patient-reported outcome. I think that that's where that social communication piece is coming in. One of the things that I'm seeing with the Black aphasia group is that moment, that hour, where everyone is together, it's amazing. It's them using social communication. You spoke about how I said that that energized my research, and that was why--because I was on this call, and they were speaking about these things, that sometimes I feel like I have to explain to the powers that be why social communication or the LPAA approach is important. But here I was talking with all of these survivors, and they were telling me, I want to be able to communicate, I want to be able to do these things. It just really confirmed for me that this type of research, we were on the right path. EBE: Right. And this is my chance for a “shameless plug” because of my life work, and that is just the power of groups. The power of groups is amazing. SELES GADSON: You know, your life work and... EBE: Well, we don't want to go there, this episode is about you. SELES GADSON: Okay. I'm telling you; I'll get into just how influential your work has been, even when I was working as a practitioner and doing group therapy, it was your work and your research that I was going to. EBE: Well, I had the honor of getting to work with Dr. Roberta Elman, and starting the Aphasia Center of California and doing that initial research, that has been such a gift to me, so, but thank you, back to your work now. That's a great transition, because I'm going to bring us to your 2022 study, looking at how aphasia severity is modulated by race and lesion size in chronic survivors. That was an amazing study. I'm going to read another quote here from that study. And that is, “understanding the origin of disparities in aphasia outcomes is critical to any efforts to promote health equity among stroke survivors with aphasia.” You said this work led you to an “Aha!” moment. And I'd love for you to share more about that moment, and about this study. SELES GADSON: Yes, this was one of my babies, I would say it was definitely a labor of love. And it's been well received. One of the things that led us to this study was that we were already aware of what the research was saying, in regards to the narrative of Black stroke survivors having these lower scores, they were having poor functional outcomes, longer hospital stays. I really wanted to understand what components neurologically, were playing into that. The research has shown that Black Americans often may have a larger stroke due to a myriad of factors-- delayed hospital arrival, not being able to receive TPA. But I wanted to know what factors neurologically were contributing to what we were seeing, not only in this baseline difference that we were seeing, but what was the bigger picture essentially. What we found was that when we looked at race and lesion size, when we did an interaction of race and lesion size, that Black and white survivors with small lesions performed similarly. But larger strokes resulted in more severe aphasia for Black people, than white people. And that was something that we didn't quite understand, because if you think about it, the larger the lesion, the poorer your aphasia should be. But in this case, the larger the lesion, the white stroke survivors were performing better and so we offered two reasons for that. One was the potential assessment bias-- that maybe with the larger stroke, there was this code-switching element that the Black stroke survivors just weren't able to do. And we were seeing that in the larger strokes, and it wasn't being picked up in the smaller strokes. Then the other was the disparity that I had mentioned earlier, which is that access to rehabilitation. It might have been more evident-- we were seeing some of those disparities in the larger strokes. We know that individuals that come from higher earning SES groups have greater access to rehabilitation services like speech and language. That was our other reason, that we were wondering if that's why we were seeing that outcome. EBE: This reminds me some of the research that Dr. Charles Ellis has been doing. I attended his keynote speech at the IARC conference in 2022 that talked about understanding what is happening upstream, because it's going to impact what's happening downstream. In terms of health disparities, it's going to have an impact. I think your research supports that. We need to learn more about it and do the research you're doing. As you reflect on your findings across these amazing studies, this research that you've been doing, can you offer to our listeners some tips on how to have more confidence with intercultural contact? SELES GADSON: That's a great question. I think the first thing that that you have to do is put yourself in places where you are connecting with people that don't look like you. EBE: I agree. And that can be hard and challenging to do. SELES GADSON: It can be, but one of the things that I say is that it goes back to some of the things that Dr. Ellis has talked about, which is being intentional. That might mean going to a different side of the neighborhood to support a Black owned business, and being within that space, to feel how it feels to be around different cultures. The other thing that I think is really important, and it comes out of literature that looks at reducing racial bias in health care, which is to avoid stereotype suppression. So oftentimes, people may be thinking something and they don't want to share it, or they try to suppress it. And the reason why that's negative is because stereotype is a cognitive organization strategy that we use. And where it becomes negative is that if you're having these stereotype ideas, or you're just not sure, if you're not able to express them within a space that you feel comfortable with, then you suppress them. And then it kind of comes out in therapy. And so, I think that those are two huge things. And then the last thing that I would say is that it's really important to build partnerships. And so, building partnerships, either with local churches, within the university area, or just seeing how you can serve in order to help create some of that confidence. But you have to put yourself out there and not wait until therapy day. EBE: Wow, thank you for those tips. And one of them reminded me of something, a tip that a local educator suggested that, even if you don't feel like you're in an environment where your everyday social context might put you with people who look different from you, that you can still listen to other voices by listening to podcasts, sign up for podcasts, sign up for Twitter feeds of people with different voices, so you can start being present to that conversation. So that was something that I have found useful and really good advice as well. SELES GADSON: So true. The other thing that I did, even someone who identifies as a Black American when I was doing my dissertation work, and previously before some other things in my career, I noticed that perspective taking was a huge piece--putting myself or imagining myself in the individual's shoes. And so, for me, that meant that I went to Black museums and exposed myself to different cultural experiences. I wasn't going into some of these spaces, whether it was collecting data or even working with individuals from other earning communities, with some type of privilege. So even in that sense, I wanted to make sure that I checked my privilege as well by doing that perspective taking. EBE: Thank you,. And this discussion could keep going, but I know our time is getting tight here. This whole effort that you put in your research of looking at HRQL measures reminds me of some of the work that I've really admired by Hilari and you had a wonderful story you could share about her, your interaction and your use of her work. Would you like to share that quickly? SELES GADSON: Oh, she's so awesome. I was sharing how when I first was diving into this literature, her work was one of the pieces that I found, the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale. I reached out to her and she shared this scale. And a couple of years later, I attended the International Aphasia Rehabilitation Conference in London. And she sat down with me. I asked her if she had any time, if we could just talk, and she was so welcoming. We sat down, and she might not even remember this, but even in that moment of us being able to talk about these things that we were both so passionate about, she just really spoke to me and encouraged me. And it's so funny, because now as I publish and do different things, my mom always says, “you gonna be just like Dr. Hilari.” EBE: Let's just do a shout out for mentorship, for people who take the time, and feel committed and passionate. Again, we're using that word again today, passionate, to support the new voices that are coming into the field. So that's the gift of mentorship. And in this whole discussion, you and I also talked about how important it is to be inclusive, and we talked about how HRQL measures sometimes are harder to use with people with severe aphasia and how they can get excluded from research. It's hard enough to get people with aphasia into the research, right? There's work by Shiggins and her colleagues looking at how often people with aphasia are excluded. But you made a good point about ways that we can include people with more severe aphasia. Do you want to mention that? SELES GADSON: I think one of the things that we have at our fingertips, and we know just from our training, is to use different visual cues to support those individuals that might have more severe aphasia. One of the things that we highlighted in the 2020 paper looking at the psychometric properties of quality of these patient reported outcomes, was that there are certain assessments that are perfect for individuals with severe aphasia, assessments like the Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA), because it has the pictures available and it has simple language. Just recognizing that even by using some of these compensation tools, whether it's pictures or modifying the language, we can still get the individual's perspective of what they want in therapy just by using some of these modifications. EBE: This reminds me, I can put one more link and resource into the show notes, because the Center for Research Excellence in Aphasia offers this wonderful speaker series. And there was just an excellent recent session by Dr. Shiggins on including people with aphasia in research. So, I'll put that link in. I want everybody to listen to that presentation. And finally, as our closing question for today, Davetrina, if you had to pick only one thing we need to achieve urgently as a community of providers, of professionals, what would that one thing be? SELES GADSON: I think we have to start using patient-reported outcomes. I think that if you were doing a clinician-reported outcome to assess the impairment, paired with that has to be some level of patient-reported outcome that will give you insight into what the patient wants to do. It's no longer optional. I think that we have to make it a paired thing with our clinician-reported outcome, is getting the perspective of the patient. EBE: I so agree with you, thank you. Thank you for this wonderful interview today. I really, really appreciate it. SELES GADSON: Thank you. EBE: And I want to thank our listeners for listening today. For references and resources mentioned in today's show, please see our show notes. They're available on our website, www.aphasiaaccess.org. And there, you can also become a member of this organization. Browse our growing library of materials and find out about the Aphasia Access Academy. If you have an idea for a future podcast episode, email us at info@aphasiaaccess.org. For Aphasia Access Conversations, I'm Ellen Bernstein Ellis and thank you again for your ongoing support of aphasia access. References and Resources Brain Friends Podcast: https://www.aphasia.org/stories/brain-friends-a-podcast-for-people-with-aphasia/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/1563389920801117 https://open.spotify.com/show/5xgkrhUhEIzJgxpRXzNpBH Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) HRQL website: https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/concept.htm National Aphasia Association Black American Conversation group registration: The Black American Aphasia Conversation Group meets through Zoom every other Monday at 4:00pm EST (1:00pm PST) . If you are interested in joining this group, please complete the form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfJN9VWjrujhebT8Z48bqDZePOHYotipFC34S8T0X8_o8rG-g/viewform Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) https://www.promishealth.org/57461-2/ Cella, D., Hahn, E. A., Jensen, S. E., Butt, Z., Nowinski, C. J., Rothrock, N., & Lohr, K. N. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes in performance measurement. . Research Triangle Park (NC): RTI Press; 2015 Sep. Publication No.: RTI-BK-0014-1509ISBN-13: 978-1-934831-14-4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK424378/ Gadson, D. S., Wallace, G., Young, H. N., Vail, C., & Finn, P. (2022). The relationship between health-related quality of life, perceived social support, and social network size in African Americans with aphasia: a cross-sectional study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 29(3), 230-239. Gadson, D. S. (2020). Health-related quality of life, social support, and social networks in African-American stroke survivors with and without aphasia. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 29(5), 104728. Gadson, D. S. (2020). Health-related quality of life, social support, and social networks in African-American stroke survivors with and without aphasia. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 29(5), 104728. Gadson, D. S., Wesley, D. B., van der Stelt, C. M., Lacey, E., DeMarco, A. T., Snider, S. F., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2022). Aphasia severity is modulated by race and lesion size in chronic survivors: A retrospective study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 100, 106270 Gray, J. D. (2022). Transcript: ASHA Voices: Confronting Health Care Disparities. Leader Live. https://leader.pubs.asha.org/do/10.1044/2021-0902-transcript-disparities-panel-2022 Law, B. M. (2021). SLP Pioneers Research on Aphasia Rehab for African Americans. Leader Live https://leader.pubs.asha.org/do/10.1044/leader.FTR4.26092021.58 Lubben, J., Gironda, M., & Lee, A. (2002). Refinements to the Lubben social network scale: The LSNS-R. The Behavioral Measurement Letter, 7(2), 2-11. Shiggins, C., Ryan, B., O'Halloran, R., Power, E., Bernhardt, J., Lindley, R. I., ... & Rose, M. L. (2022). Towards the consistent inclusion of people with aphasia in stroke research irrespective of discipline. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 103(11), 2256-2263. Shiggins, C. (2023) The road less travelled: Charting a path towards the consistent inclusion of people with aphasia in stroke research. Aphasia CRE Seminar Series #36 (Video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqVfn4XMHho
The Hall of Famer Kim Clijsters joined me right before Thanksgiving, and just as Belgium played their first The World Cup game. We had a magnificent chat. She began her pro career in 1998 and In 2003 at the age of 20 years old she reached #1 in singles and in doubles, She played Graf, Seles and Capriati, and battled Hingis, Davenport, Venus, Serena, and most significantly her fellow countrywoman and childhood rival Justine Henin, and we covered it all. We talked about how she grew up in tennis , her perspectives on today's WTA players including Leylah Fernandez, Iga Swiatek and we talked in lengthy how she identified with the retirement of Ash Barty. Kim and discussed her career in length, and she told me about some of her superstitions in The 10 Ball Scramble. Recorded 11.23 Released 12.2 The Craig Shapiro Tennis Podcast is Powered By Sergio Tacchini Diadora is the official shoe of the show Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
El invitado al episodio # 178 de Máximo Desempeño es Gabriel Jaramillo, uno de los mejores entrenadores de tenis del mundo.A lo largo de su carrera ha entrenado a súper estrellas como Pete Sampras, Andre Agassi, Mónica Seles, Jim Courier, María Sharapova, Anna Kournikova y Kei Nishikori, entre muchos otros.Gabe, como le dicen sus amigos, tiene un talento innato para detectar los rasgos y fortalezas que diferencian a un buen jugador de una súper estrella de talla mundial.Cuando Gabe tenía tan solo 16 años, decidió dejar todas las comodidades que tenía en su casa para ir detrás de su sueño y triunfar en Estados Unidos.Gabe tenía clarísimo que quería ser el mejor entrenador de tenis del mundo y esto implicaba trabajar y aprender con los mejores. Gabe es un hombre que ama su trabajo y está convencido de que nació con el don no de entrenar sino de hacer campeones.En su exitosa carrera, Gabe ha profundizado en el entrenamiento de habilidades claves para llegar a la élite del deporte mundial. Entre ellas están la competitividad, la fortaleza mental, el manejo de las emociones y el deseo constante de mejorar y aprender.Además de ser un gran coach, Gabe también es un empresario exitoso, speaker motivacional y autor de un libro titulado How to Make Champions.Acompáñame a descubrir cómo este entrenador colombiano llegó a triunfar en Estados Unidos y se convirtió en un referente del deporte mundial.
Radio Marija ir klausītāju veidots radio, kas nes Dieva Vārdu pasaulē. Radio Marija balss skan 24 stundas diennaktī. Šajos raidījumos klausītājiem kā saviem draugiem neatkarīgi no viņu reliģiskās pārliecības cenšamies sniegt Kristus Labo Vēsti – Evaņģēliju, skaidru katoliskās Baznīcas mācību. Cenšamies vairot lūgšanas pieredzi un sniegt iespēju ielūkoties visas cilvēces kultūras daudzveidībā. Radio Marija visā pasaulē darbojas uz brīvprātīgo kalpošanas pamata. Labprātīga savu talantu un laika ziedošana Dieva godam un jaunās evaņģelizācijas labā ir daļa no Radio Marija harizmas. Tā ir lieliska iespēja ikvienam īstenot savus talantus Evaņģēlija pasludināšanas darbā, piedzīvojot kalpošanas prieku. Ticam, ka Dievs īpaši lietos ikvienu cilvēku, kurš atsauksies šai kalpošanai, lai ar Radio Marija starpniecību paveiktu Latvijā lielas lietas. Radio Marija ir arī ģimene, kas vieno dažādu vecumu, dažādu konfesiju, dažādu sociālo slāņu cilvēkus, ļaujot katram būt iederīgam un sniegt savu pienesumu Dieva Vārda pasludināšanā, kā arī kopīgā lūgšanas pieredzē. "Patvērums Dievā 24 stundas diennaktī", - tā ir Radio Marija Latvija devīze. RML var uztvert Rīgā 97.3, Liepājā 97.1, Krāslavā 97.0, Valkā 93.2, kā arī ar [satelītuztvērēja palīdzību un interneta aplikācijās](http://www.rml.lv/klausies/).
Graf, Navratilova, Seles, Serena, Hingis...Jennifer Capriati not only competed with the game's greats, she beat them. It was an unconventional path. From youth prodigy to tennis survivor, Capriati put herself back in slam contention in 2003 when she met Justine Henin in an all-time classic semifinal under the lights at Arthur Ashe.Come join the Patreon family for bonus content and ad-free episodes: https://www.patreon.com/openera Follow @OpenEraPod on Twitter! And say hello to @DesaiDevang while you're there.If merch is your thing, be sure to check out the store: https://bit.ly/merchera Or reach out to the show and say hey: podcast@openera.ca If you enjoyed today's show, please rate Open Era 5-Stars on Apple Podcasts.See you again next week for an all new episode of Open Era.
Graf, Navratilova, Seles, Serena, Hingis...Jennifer Capriati not only competed with the game's greats, she beat them. It was an unconventional path. From youth prodigy to tennis survivor, Capriati put herself back in slam contention in 2003 when she met Justine Henin in an all-time classic semifinal under the lights at Arthur Ashe.Come join the Patreon family for bonus content and ad-free episodes: https://www.patreon.com/openera Follow @OpenEraPod on Twitter! And say hello to @DesaiDevang while you're there.If merch is your thing, be sure to check out the store: https://bit.ly/merchera Or reach out to the show and say hey: podcast@openera.ca If you enjoyed today's show, please rate Open Era 5-Stars on Apple Podcasts.See you again next week for an all new episode of Open Era.
Es nešaubos, ka maija pirmās nedēļas noslēgumā mēs jau sen vairs neatceramies aprīli. Un tomēr – joku mēnesis bija, pajokojās un aizskrēja tālāk, bet mēs palikām ar pārdzīvoto un piedzīvoto lappusēs.Šajā sērijā ar Zani (@mom.who.reads.a.lot) un Sandru (@pielasit_sirdi) pārrunājām mēneša grāmatu, kas aprīlī bija Henrikas Andersones pusaudžu romāns "Gabaliņš dvēseles". Pie reizes papļāpājām par pieļaujamo un neiedomājamo pusaudžu literatūrā, kā arī izrunājām citus mēneša iespaidus lappusēs.Paldies izdevniecībai "Liels un mazs" par iespēju lasīt H. Andersones "Gabaliņš dvēseles". Grāmatu iesakām iegādāties izdevniecības mājaslapā https://liels-un-mazs.myshopify.com/collections/gramatas/products/gabalins-dveselesTiekamies maijā! Sērijā pieminētās grāmatas un autori:*Henrika Andersone "Gabaliņš dvēseles", "Emma Glorija un sarkanā Ilgu grāmata"*The Discomfort of Evening by Marieke Lucas Rijneveld*Vanesa Springrora "Piekrišana"*Elīsabete Hellena Lāšena, Marine Šneidere "Es esmu Dzīve", "Es esmu Nāve"*Inese Zandere "Divas Almas"*Delfīne de Vigāna "Bērni ir karaļi", "Based on a True Story"*Kristīne Želve "Grosvaldi"*Alekss Šulmans "Izdzīvojušie"*Timotijs Snaiders "Asinszemes"*Anna Krasiļščika "Klau, aizbrauksim uz Unalašku"*Tamāra Horiha Zerņa "Meitiņa"*Mets Heigs "Cilvēki un es"*Laura Vinogradova "Upe"*Ismails Kadare "Mirušo armijas ģenerālis"*Katrīna Randela "Vilku meitene"*Tatjana Tolstaja "Lūška"*Niklass Nats o Dāgs "1793", "1794"*Bjērns Natthiko Lindeblāts "Varbūt es maldos"*Ērina Hantere "Klanu suņi. Tukšā pilsēta"*Marjus Marcinkevičs, Vitālija Maskvite, Lina Itagaki "Bete un lidojošā dzimšanas dienas dāvana"
Transgender Cats Exist? : In This Episode Body Shaming, New Yorkers, Andrew Schulz Radio City Hall Sold Out,Future Civilizations and we asked our Seles if Transgender Cats Exist??Follow us :Instagram, Twitter & Facebook:@wbspodcast@ed_wbs--------------------------------------------------------------------Send us an email with Topics Questions and / or looking for advice from this brilliant idiots send it over we'll see what we come up with.podcastwbs@gmail.com----------------------------------------------------------------Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/wbspodcast/Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/wbspodcast/Twitter : https://twitter.com/wbspodcastTIKTOK : https://tiktok.com/wbspodcastSupport the show (https://teespring.com/stores/when-boredom-strikes-2)
It's a special week as we are extremely happy to speak to our very first umpire on the podcast!Sultan Gangji is a former umpire that has worked at some of the biggest tennis events in the world. He has umpired Wimbledon finals & has had the best seat in the stadium for many epic matches. Sampras, Agassi, Edberg, Graf, Seles, Becker, Courier & Borg are just a few of the players that he has worked alongside
Sim, foi isso mesmo que você leu: o Caio Brettas está entre nós para comentar, junto a Dezão, lord Dérick e SeleSérgio, sobre os jogos desse fim de semana! -- Chegou o nosso Clube de Assinantes: https://brffootball.com.br/assine! -- https://brffootball.com.br/ https://twitter.com/brffootball https://instagram.com/brffootball https://youtube.com/c/brasilfantasyfootball -- Email: dizai@brffootball.com.br
There have been few players in tennis history as consistent and humble as our guest, Amy Frazier proved to be throughout her long career. With longevity comes records, such as the distinction of having spent 18 conservative years in the top 100 (the longest ever continuous span by a female player who wasn't able to reach the top 10 - she made it to #13) OR having made 71 grand slam appearances - including 20 straight US Open events (a record before Venus Williams made this her latest achievement). Amy's stellar career included 8 WTA titles, 30 wins against top 10 champions including: Navratilova, Henin, Hingis and Seles as well as being the official WTA trivia answer to the question “who was the last player to ever play legend, Steffi Graf before her sudden retirement?” Join host Jon Guerrica as we spotlight a career of a player that wasn't fully recognized for what she was able to achieve during her amazing flat groundstroke striking career. This week, we get to know….the fantastic, Amy Frazier. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/jon-guerrica/support
Sometimes the bad guys win.Sometimes the people with the worst intentions get what they want in life and their victims lose everything, like when one unemployed German lathe operator attempted to murder the best tennis player in the world with a 9-inch boning knife in 1993 – on live TV. Visit us online at itshometownhistory.comSupport our show by becoming a Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/itshometownhistory
Support The Ready Play Tennis Podcast on Patreon: www.patreon.com/readyplaytennis. Connect with us! E: readyplaytennispodcast@gmail.com IG & TikTok: @readyplaytennispodcast Check out the JulyAugust 2021 issue of IN Magazine featuring Ready Play Tennis Podcast The Western & Southern Open is in the books, and its champions Ashleigh Barty and Sascha Zverev are poised to make deep runs as among the favourites heading into next week's U.S. Open. In the early days of this podcast, the guys forgot who was the #1 player in the world on the ladies side... Ash is making the guys eat their word, with Aldwin and Jason discussing whether she is starting her own era of dominance the likes of former greats like Seles, Graf and Hingis. With the beauty of her play and ease of victories this week, would you agree, or is it still too soon to compare her to such tennis legends? For the first time in nine years the top for seeds make a Masters 1,000 semi final on the men's side... and none of them are the big three. The guys reflect on this new era and the exciting transitional period we're seeing in men's tennis. Of course, Aldwin and Jason discuss Aldwin's ex's (Tsitsipas for new listeners) propensity for mid-match potty breaks, which was called out by Zverev in their semi-final encounter. The guys witnessed this in Toronto last week in matches against both Humbert and Ruud. Jason starts the show by inviting a therapy session on his recent poor on court play... against the opponent (and doubles partner) who has his number, as the guys head into their first GLTA tournament in two years in Montreal over Labour Day Weekend.
No episódio de nº 27 do Troca Fitas recebemos a Tânia Seles, do Sopa Alternativa, e ouvimos os noruegueses do Royksöpp misturando tudo, a dupla inusitada de Paul Banks e RZA no seu projeto Banks and Steelz, e relembramos a memorável precursora do grunge Tina Bell com seu Bam Bam. Além disso, falamos sobre carro do pintinho colorido, personagens icônicos de Sérgio Mallandro, animais de estimação criando o caos, plágios de Labirinto e sons do Sonic. Ah, e recebemos o som mais recente do projeto Dezert Horse, "Miranda"! BG: Sérgio Mallandro, "Lua de Cristal" Quer apoiar a gente e ajudar o podcast a ter uma qualidade melhor? Entra lá no apoia.se/trocafitaspod e paga uma cerveja por mês para ajudar os irmãos Ramos a comprarem caviar. :) --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/trocafitaspod/message
"Ja nebūtu agresijas, tad visas lauvas, kas sanāktu padzerties pie vienas peļķes, būtu to peļķi izdzērušas un turpat noslāptu no tā, ka vairāk nav ūdens," saka tēlnieks Gļebs Panteļejevs LTV raidījumā "Kultūrdeva", skaidrojot agresijas tēmu izstādē “Hormonija”, bet māksliniece Olga Šilova par izstādi “Laktācija” atklāj, ka viņai svarīgi bijis intuitīvi izpausties, un tāpēc var būt grūti paskaidrot, ko esi izdarījis – tu tā gribi un to dari.
Monica Seles dominerar världstennisen när en Graf-fanatiker attackerar henne under en match 1993. Resan tillbaka blir tuffare än någon kunnat ana. Och vad hade hon åstadkommit, om inte...? Medverkande: Catarina Lindqvist Ryan, svensk topp-tio-spelare i världen på 1980-talet som spelat mot både Steffi Graf och Monica Seles. Maria Strandlund Tomsvik, tidigare proffsspelare som var med i tennisturneringen där Seles blev knivhuggen numera kommentator för Eurosport. Ett program av Susanna Andrén, våren 2021. Slutmix: Tobias Carlsson. Arkivljud: bland annat från Tennis Channel, CBS och NBC. Litteratur: From Fear to Victory och Getting a Grip, av Monica Seles. Musik: Madonna och Philip Glass, bland andra.
Zina Garrison has been thru the fire, growing up in Houston, Texas she rose to become the #1 junior player in the world, and in her first pro tournament reched the quarterfinals of Roland Garros. She won 14 tournaments and in 1990 beat Seles and Graf on her way to the Wimbledon final. She and I had a tour de force chat, discussing her bout with depression at the start of the pandemic, her impressions of Aryna Sabalenka, as well as the the majority of African American players on tour; Sloane Stephens, Madison Keys, Coco Gauff, and of course Venus and Serena Williams. We discussed Zina's career in length, including her struggles to get an endorsement deal when she was 4 in the world. We discussed her lifelong battle with bulimia, and her experience as Fed Cup Captain. This show is brought to you by Sergio Tacchini, use the code CRAIG30 at checkout. Areté Complete is the official towel of the show, use SHAP20 at checkout.Recorded 5/6 Released 5/8 See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
The guys come together with 'the oracle of tennis' himself, Jonathan Scott. Friend and tennis journalist with Tennis Magazine and Tennis.com, in Part 1 of this episode Jonathan dishes with Aldwin and Jason on the results of the Miami Open. We're starting to see what a post 'Big Three' era could look like as new talent continue to build their own exciting storylines on the men's side. For the women, the guys talk about the talents of Barty (who clearly loves Miami), the real return of Andreescu, and early exit of big match Osaka. Can these ladies grow and build the consistent tournament wins to become this generation's Graf, Seles or Navratilova? Tune in next week for Part 2 and the guys review with Jonathan their Top 3 stories in the tennis world in 2021 thus far! E: readyplaytennispodcast@gmail.com IG & TikTok: @readyplaytennispodcast
The Godfather of tennis comes to help us celebrate our 100th episode of the podcast. The coach to many, namely, Agassi, Seles, Rios, Courier, Arias, Sharapova, Becker..The list goes on. The man who changed the landscape of Tennis Academies globally. This is not a one to miss.. Enjoy
On Saturday, Naomi Osaka beat Jennifer Brady 6-4, 6-3 to set herself apart. It was her 21st consecutive match win, her 4th Grand Slam title, and her 2nd Australian Open crown. Her 12-0 record at the quarter-finals and beyond in majors is unmatched by anyone else in the Open Era.We look back on where the final was won and lost, reflect on Osaka’s journey to this point and her place in the game, consider her potential on grass and clay, and discuss what the future might hold for Brady. There’s also a preview of tomorrow's men’s final between Novak Djokovic and Daniil Medvedev. How can you back against Djokovic in an Australian Open final? But why do we have a feeling for Medvedev? The Tennis Podcast is presented by Catherine Whitaker and David Law, and features Matt Roberts. It is produced weekly year-round, and daily during the Grand Slam tournaments.NEWSLETTERSign up to get our news, offers, predictions and Matt’s Stat - http://eepurl.com/gbmzRXEMAILWe hope that the podcast helps to provide some form of escape during these challenging times. If you ever feel like writing to us, our e-mail is open – info@tennispodcast.netSOCIAL MEDIA Twitter - https://twitter.com/TennisPodcastInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/thetennispodcast/Reddit - https://www.reddit.com/r/thetennispodcast/ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Siga o Historiador do Esporte nas redes sociais: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/historiadordoesporte/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/HDEoficial Monica Seles foi um dos maiores nomes do tênis mundial no fim dos anos 80 e início dos anos 90. A garota prodígio sérvia teve uma ascensão meteórica no esporte e fez frente às grandes tenistas da sua geração ainda na sua adolescência. Mas a trajetória de Seles ficou marcada por um crime que chocou o mundo: o dia em que ela foi esfaqueada em plena quadra durante uma partida na cidade de Hamburgo, na Alemanha. O Historiador do Esporte recebe o jornalista Mário Sérgio Cruz para falar sobre essa história de crime e esporte, mas também sobre tênis e muito mais! Site: http://historiadordoesporte.com.br/ Contato: podcast@historiadordoesporte.com.br REFERÊNCIAS: Jogos e melhores momentos de Monica Seles: Monica Seles vs Steffi Graf 1993 AO Final HD 1080i - YouTube Monica Seles vs Jennifer Capriati in the match that changed women's tennis! | US Open 1991 Semifinal - YouTube FULL VERSION 1996 - Seles vs Huber - Australian Open - YouTube 1992 Wimbledon Monica Seles Martina Navratilova - YouTube Jogo completo Monica Seles x Magdalena Maleeva, o dia do ataque: Monica Seles vs. Magdalena Maleeva / Hamburg 1993 - YouTube Entrevista de Monica Seles ao programa 20/20: Monica Seles Interview (April 17 2009) - YouTube --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/historiador-do-esporte/support
A edição da semana do OUÇA O QUE EU DIGO fala sobre uma das bandas mais criativas e, por consequência, de um dos caras mais interessantes da música: Smashing Pumpkins. No episódio 039 do programa, Ed Junior e Lucas Jacovini se livram do John Pereira para falar sobre os álbuns lançados durante a formação clássica da banda comandada por Billy Corgan. Para isso, uma convidada mais do que especial: Tânia Seles, do Sopa Alternativa, se junta aos dois para falar sobre a sua banda da vida - e ainda colaborar com a foto de uma raridade que ilustra o episódio. ► Saiba mais sobre o programa e encontre links para tudo o que citamos: https://bit.ly/2Yy0J0d ► Ouça outros programas e saiba mais sobre o AudioCast: https://bit.ly/AudioCast ► Assine o nosso Apoia-se: apoia.se/audiograma Assine o AudioCast no Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Deezer, Amazon Music, Stitcher ou Tune In. --- Quer falar com a gente? imprensa@audiograma.com.br
Yakın Profil serimizin 5. durağında tenisin büyük efsanelerinden, bir sonraki neslin oyununa yön vermiş bir isim var: Monica Seles. Seles'in filmlere konu olacak hikayesini konuşurken çocukluğundan başladık, profesyonel olduğu ve tenis dünyasını salladığı yıllara geçtik. Oradan da o saldırıyı konuştuk. Acaba olmasaydı şimdi hayatı nasıl olurdu, tenis dünyası nasıl olurdu dediğimiz saldırıya. Büyük geri dönüşünü de konuşup kapattık. Gerçekten çok büyük tenisçi. İyi dinlemeler! I. Çocukluk - (3:34), II. Profesyonelliğe Giriş ve Dominasyon - (16:49), III. Saldırı - (31:21), IV. Geri Dönüş - (46:50), V. Tenise Bıraktıkları - (55:15). Yakın Profil serisinin diğer bölümlerine bütün platformlardan ulaşabilirsiniz: Novak Djokovic (54. bölüm), John McEnroe (58. bölüm), Rafael Nadal (61. bölüm), Roger Federer (68 ve 69. bölüm). Modern Jazz Samba by Kevin MacLeod Link: incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/4063-mo…n-jazz-samba License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Song: AWN - Nouvelle Lune (Vlog No Copyright Music) Music provided by Vlog No Copyright M Video Link: youtu.be/VZJ9PGyPHkg
Als am 30. April 1993 Günter Parche Tennis-Star Monica Seles während eines Turniers am Hamburger Rothenbaum mit einem Messer attackiert, verändert er die Tennisgeschichte für immer. Während die körperlichen Wunden bei der US-Amerikanerin zum Glück schnell verheilen, wird sich Seles seelisch noch sehr lange nicht von diesem Tag erholen können. Das ewige Duell mit Steffi Graf wird damit auf unnatürliche Weise verkürzt – und eine Karriere verändert, die noch viel größer hätte werden können, als sie ohnehin schon war. Shownotes: Das komplette Spiel zwischen Seles und Maleeva am 30. April 1993 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHrxLcYG11o Das letzte Match zwischen Monica Seles und Steffi Graf (Roland Garros 1999) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHn5Kked9N0 Artikel „Das ist kein Spiel“ von Ursula März auf ZEIT online (nur mit Abo) oder in ZEIT Verbrechen 05/2020 (Text über Günther Parche und seine Vorbereitung auf die Tat) https://www.zeit.de/zustimmung?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zeit.de%2Fzeit-verbrechen%2F2020%2F05%2Fattentat-monica-seles-tennis-genther-parche Die Karriere von Monica Seles auf wtatennis.com https://www.wtatennis.com/players/190141/monica-seles/bio Folgt uns auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/schattenseiten_podcast/ Folgt uns auf Twitter: https://twitter.com/schatten_pod Schreibt uns per Mail: schattenseiten.podcast@gmail.com
Šobrīd dzīvojam svētīgā pārmaiņu laikā. Šādos laikos rodās iespēja piedzimt mūsu dvēselei. Nav tā, ka viņa nepastāvēja, viņa ir mūžīga un klātesoša, tikai mūsu aizņemtība ar sevi, ar lomu, ko spēlējām, nav ļāvis viņai izpausties virszemē.
No 24. jūlija Lietuvas Nacionālā mākslas muzeja Nacionālajā mākslas galerijā Viļņā skatāma ceļojošā izstāde "Nepieradinātās dvēseles. Simbolisms Baltijas valstu mākslā" – vērienīgs kopprojekts, veltīts Baltijas valstu 100 gadu neatkarības gadadienai. Izstāde jau guvusi atzinību Francijā un Igaunijā, kur to apmeklējuši vairāki simti tūkstošu skatītāju. Svinot Latvijas, Igaunijas un Lietuvas neatkarības simtgadi, grandiozā izstāde pirmo reizi tika eksponēta 2018. gadā Orsē muzejā Parīzē, piesaistot vairāk nekā 236 000 mākslas cienītāju uzmanību. Vēlāk – gada nogalē – tā atvērās Igaunijas Mākslas muzejā KUMU Tallinā, kur apmeklētāju skaits pārsniedzis 34 000. 2020. gadā, kad Baltijas valstis atzīmē neatkarības atgūšanas 30. gadadienu, šī izstāde pilnā mērogā jau skatāma Viļņā un drīzumā nonāks arī Rīgā. Par izstādes sadaļu “Latvijas simbolisms” stāsta tās kuratore Dace Lamberga, bet savu ieskatu par simbolisma nozīmi Baltijas valstu vēsturē sniedz Nacionālās mākslas galerijas vadošā kuratore Lolita Jablonskiene. Ekspozīcija Lietuvas Nacionālā mākslas muzeja struktūrvienībā – Nacionālajā mākslas galerijā – iekļauj izcilus glezniecības, tēlniecības un grafikas darbus no muzeju krājumiem un privātkolekcijām, kā arī retas 19.–20. gadsimta mijas publikācijas. Viļņas izstāde atšķiras ar īpaši veidotu ekrānu (arhitekte Ieva Cicėnaitė), kura radīšanu iedvesmojušas Mikaloja Konstantīna Čurļoņa (1875–1911) gleznās redzamās gaismu spēles, un bilingvālais izstādes katalogs lietuviešu un angļu valodā. Projektu papildina plaša kultūras pasākumu programma, kuras ietvaros skatāmas filmas par igauņu, latviešu un lietuviešu 19.–20. gadsimta mijas māksliniekiem. Lielākais uzsvars izstādē tiek likts uz diviem ievērojamiem simbolisma klasiķiem – Mikaloju Konstantīnu Čurļoni un Ferdinandu Ruščicu (1870–1936), kuru mākslinieciskais rokraksts ir pazīstams arī tālu ārpus Lietuvas robežām.
Graf, Navratilova, Seles, Serena, Hingis...Jennifer Capriati not only competed with the game's greats, she beat them. It was an unconventional path. From youth prodigy to tennis survivor, Capriati put herself back in slam contention in 2003 when she met Justine Henin in an all-time classic semifinal under the lights at Arthur Ashe.Come join the Patreon family for bonus content and ad-free episodes: https://www.patreon.com/openera Follow @OpenEraPod on Twitter! And say hello to @DesaiDevang while you're there.If merch is your thing, be sure to check out the store: https://bit.ly/merchera Or reach out to the show and say hey: podcast@openera.ca If you enjoyed today's show, please rate Open Era 5-Stars on Apple Podcasts.See you again next week for an all new episode of Open Era.
Graf, Navratilova, Seles, Serena, Hingis...Jennifer Capriati not only competed with the game’s greats, she beat them. It was an unconventional path. From youth prodigy to tennis survivor, Capriati put herself back in slam contention in 2003 when she met Justine Henin in an all-time classic semifinal under the lights at Arthur Ashe.Come join the Patreon family for bonus content and ad-free episodes: https://www.patreon.com/openera Follow @OpenEraPod on Twitter! And say hello to @DesaiDevang while you're there.If merch is your thing, be sure to check out the store: https://bit.ly/merchera Or reach out to the show and say hey: podcast@openera.ca If you enjoyed today’s show, please rate Open Era 5-Stars on Apple Podcasts.See you again next week for an all new episode of Open Era.
Mert Ertunga'yı yanımıza almışken tenis nostaljisi yapmadan edemedik. Bu bölümde ona emekli olan tenis efsanelerini sorduk. Ve öyle bir muhabbet çıktı ki! Mert Abi'nin Björn Borg ve Andre Agassi anılarını mutlaka duymak isteyeceksiniz. Hele Agassi anısı efsane! İşte konuştuğumuz isimler: Björn Borg (02:20), Pete Sampras (18:00), Andre Agassi (22:50), Stefan Edberg (33:38), Andy Roddick (38:56), Monica Seles (45:40), Steffi Graf (50:18), Martina Hingis (59:05), Justine Henin (1:03:11), Maria Sharapova (1:08:04). İyi dinlemeler! Photo: US Open 1990 Final (Sampras d. Agassi)
Lietuvas Nacionālā mākslas muzeja Nacionālajā mākslas galerijā Viļņā atklāta ceļojošā izstāde “Nepieradinātās dvēseles. Simbolisms Baltijas valstu mākslā”, kuru 2018. gada pavasarī varēja redzēt Orsē muzejā Parīzē un tad ceļoja uz Tallinu. Kāpēc var teikt, ka notikums ir bijis zīmīgs un arī simbolisks – pārrunājam ar projekta vadītāju no Latvijas puses – mākslas zinātnieci Gintu Gerhardi-Upenieci. Viņa mudina visus interesentus doties uz Viļņu apskatīt izstādi, jo tā atšķiras gan no tās, kas bija aplūkojama Parīzē, gan Tallinā. Izstādes atklāšana vienlaikus saistās ar skumju notikumu, nesen mūžībā devies viens no izstādes “Nepieradinātās dvēseles. Simbolisms Baltijas valstu mākslā” idejas autoriem Čurļoņa Nacionālā mākslas muzeja Kauņā direktors Osvalds Daugelis. Izstāde Viļņā būs aplūkojama līdz 11.oktobrim. Pēc tam izstāde “Nepieradinātās dvēseles. Simbolisms Baltijas valstu mākslā” būs skatāma arī Rīgā.
El divendres 30 d'abril 1993 la tennista Mònica Seles disputava contra la búlgara Magdalena Maleeva els quarts de final del torneig d'Hamburg. Davant de 10.000 espectadors Günter Parch un fan de Steffi Graf, no podia suportar com la seva tenista preferida perdia el primer lloc del rànquing de la WTA davant Seles. Així doncs va decidir atacar-la amb un ganivet sobre la mateixa pista. Benvinguts a La Nit Mes Fosca Gràcies als mecenes: - Marc Roig - Pau Col·labora a Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lanitmesfosca Segueix-nos a: Facebook: https://bit.ly/2xrBZJa Instagram: https://bit.ly/2XibXYp Twitter: https://bit.ly/2FKCYZK
Going into Wimbledon in 1991, Steffi Graf’s supremacy was under threat. She hadn’t won a Grand Slam title for 18 months, she’d lost her No.1 ranking to Monica Seles, her father’s scandalous private life meant she was being hounded by the tabloids, and Gabriela Sabatini had emerged as a real rival.But Graf rose above everything, dominating the draw before winning a classic final 8-6 in the third set against Sabatini. How did Seles’ withdrawal pave the way for Graf? In what way did Sabatini revolutionise her game during her run to the 1990 US Open title to try to combat Graf? What made Graf such a formidable player? And does her career get the credit it deserves? Finally, we hear from Christopher Clarey and Mary Carillo about why they loved watching Sabatini play and the reasons why they think she only won one Grand Slam title. The Tennis Podcast is presented by Catherine Whitaker and David Law, and features Matt Roberts. It is produced weekly year-round, and daily during the Grand Slam tournaments. It is crowdfunded by listeners each December. * TENNIS RE-LIVED *We will be doing daily shows throughout the original Wimbledon dates, looking back on some of the tournament’s best matches and most important stories. The 1991 final between Steffi Graf and Gabriela Sabatini is split into parts 1, 2 & 3 on YouTube, while tomorrow’s match, Andre Agassi vs. Goran Ivanisevic from 1992, is available in full. * NEWSLETTER *Sign up to get our news, isolation diaries and Matt’s Stat - http://eepurl.com/gbmzRX* EMAIL *We hope that the podcast helps to provide some form of escape during these challenging times. If you ever feel like writing to us, our e-mail is open – info@tennispodcast.net*REDDIT *We have a sub-reddit page! It's a growing online community where over 925 listeners chat about the show and all things tennis. Join in - https://www.reddit.com/r/thetennispodcast/* KICKSTARTER * We are crowdfunded for 2020, but if you’d like to receive a reminder e-mail when we launch our next Kickstarter in December, then you can put your details here - http://eepurl.com/gwWILX*SOCIAL MEDIA *Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/thetennispodcast/Twitter - www.twitter.com/tennispodcast See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Should we understand the conservative elites of #Never Trump as homogeneous and united? Failed renegades? Moral guardians of republicanism and values? In their new book Never Trump: The Revolt of the Conservative Elites (Oxford University Press, 2020), Robert P. Saldin (Professor of Political Science at the University of Montana) and Steven M. Teles (Professor of Political Science at Johns Hopkins University) analyze the strategies and motivations of the Never Trump conservatives to paint a vivid picture of the movement that Liz Mair called “the political equivalent of a doomed species.” Their nuanced analysis of the professional and intellectual circles of the extended Republican party network who made up the Never Trump movement, concludes that conservative elites who opposed Trump did so for varying reasons, using disparate methods. Based on interviews with 62 elites (and provided emails and other communications), Saldin and Seles portray the foreign policy elites as a professional class -- zealous moderates and reluctant partisans -- who nevertheless stepped forward to isolate “crazies.” They objected not only to the issues but Trump’s temperament: the lying, cruelty, narcissism, and flagrant norm-violations. On the other hand, political operatives -- the pollsters, campaign consultants, fundraisers, and media experts -- were far less willing to publicly take a stand given their self-interest in employment with Republican campaigns. But Saldin and Teles’s analysis demonstrates that even within this self-interested group, renegades pursued actions that would make them outcasts such as Joel Searby and William Kristol’s attempt to woe an independent candidate such as Jim Mattis or Mitt Romney. Chapters include an analysis of the institutional and material factors that influenced conservative public intellectuals, how identity -- especially being Jewish or Mormon -- factored into the level of fear of authoritarianism, the quid pro quo that made lawyers more likely to look the other way, and what Saldin and Teles call the “marginal value” of economists who showed little attempt to organize collectively against the nomination and election of Donald Trump. Benjamin Warren assisted with this podcast. Susan Liebell is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship (Routledge, 2013) and, most recently, “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” in the Journal of Politics (August 2020). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Should we understand the conservative elites of #Never Trump as homogeneous and united? Failed renegades? Moral guardians of republicanism and values? In their new book Never Trump: The Revolt of the Conservative Elites (Oxford University Press, 2020), Robert P. Saldin (Professor of Political Science at the University of Montana) and Steven M. Teles (Professor of Political Science at Johns Hopkins University) analyze the strategies and motivations of the Never Trump conservatives to paint a vivid picture of the movement that Liz Mair called “the political equivalent of a doomed species.” Their nuanced analysis of the professional and intellectual circles of the extended Republican party network who made up the Never Trump movement, concludes that conservative elites who opposed Trump did so for varying reasons, using disparate methods. Based on interviews with 62 elites (and provided emails and other communications), Saldin and Seles portray the foreign policy elites as a professional class -- zealous moderates and reluctant partisans -- who nevertheless stepped forward to isolate “crazies.” They objected not only to the issues but Trump’s temperament: the lying, cruelty, narcissism, and flagrant norm-violations. On the other hand, political operatives -- the pollsters, campaign consultants, fundraisers, and media experts -- were far less willing to publicly take a stand given their self-interest in employment with Republican campaigns. But Saldin and Teles’s analysis demonstrates that even within this self-interested group, renegades pursued actions that would make them outcasts such as Joel Searby and William Kristol’s attempt to woe an independent candidate such as Jim Mattis or Mitt Romney. Chapters include an analysis of the institutional and material factors that influenced conservative public intellectuals, how identity -- especially being Jewish or Mormon -- factored into the level of fear of authoritarianism, the quid pro quo that made lawyers more likely to look the other way, and what Saldin and Teles call the “marginal value” of economists who showed little attempt to organize collectively against the nomination and election of Donald Trump. Benjamin Warren assisted with this podcast. Susan Liebell is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship (Routledge, 2013) and, most recently, “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” in the Journal of Politics (August 2020). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Should we understand the conservative elites of #Never Trump as homogeneous and united? Failed renegades? Moral guardians of republicanism and values? In their new book Never Trump: The Revolt of the Conservative Elites (Oxford University Press, 2020), Robert P. Saldin (Professor of Political Science at the University of Montana) and Steven M. Teles (Professor of Political Science at Johns Hopkins University) analyze the strategies and motivations of the Never Trump conservatives to paint a vivid picture of the movement that Liz Mair called “the political equivalent of a doomed species.” Their nuanced analysis of the professional and intellectual circles of the extended Republican party network who made up the Never Trump movement, concludes that conservative elites who opposed Trump did so for varying reasons, using disparate methods. Based on interviews with 62 elites (and provided emails and other communications), Saldin and Seles portray the foreign policy elites as a professional class -- zealous moderates and reluctant partisans -- who nevertheless stepped forward to isolate “crazies.” They objected not only to the issues but Trump's temperament: the lying, cruelty, narcissism, and flagrant norm-violations. On the other hand, political operatives -- the pollsters, campaign consultants, fundraisers, and media experts -- were far less willing to publicly take a stand given their self-interest in employment with Republican campaigns. But Saldin and Teles's analysis demonstrates that even within this self-interested group, renegades pursued actions that would make them outcasts such as Joel Searby and William Kristol's attempt to woe an independent candidate such as Jim Mattis or Mitt Romney. Chapters include an analysis of the institutional and material factors that influenced conservative public intellectuals, how identity -- especially being Jewish or Mormon -- factored into the level of fear of authoritarianism, the quid pro quo that made lawyers more likely to look the other way, and what Saldin and Teles call the “marginal value” of economists who showed little attempt to organize collectively against the nomination and election of Donald Trump. Benjamin Warren assisted with this podcast. Susan Liebell is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. She is the author of Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship (Routledge, 2013) and, most recently, “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” in the Journal of Politics (August 2020).
Should we understand the conservative elites of #Never Trump as homogeneous and united? Failed renegades? Moral guardians of republicanism and values? In their new book Never Trump: The Revolt of the Conservative Elites (Oxford University Press, 2020), Robert P. Saldin (Professor of Political Science at the University of Montana) and Steven M. Teles (Professor of Political Science at Johns Hopkins University) analyze the strategies and motivations of the Never Trump conservatives to paint a vivid picture of the movement that Liz Mair called “the political equivalent of a doomed species.” Their nuanced analysis of the professional and intellectual circles of the extended Republican party network who made up the Never Trump movement, concludes that conservative elites who opposed Trump did so for varying reasons, using disparate methods. Based on interviews with 62 elites (and provided emails and other communications), Saldin and Seles portray the foreign policy elites as a professional class -- zealous moderates and reluctant partisans -- who nevertheless stepped forward to isolate “crazies.” They objected not only to the issues but Trump’s temperament: the lying, cruelty, narcissism, and flagrant norm-violations. On the other hand, political operatives -- the pollsters, campaign consultants, fundraisers, and media experts -- were far less willing to publicly take a stand given their self-interest in employment with Republican campaigns. But Saldin and Teles’s analysis demonstrates that even within this self-interested group, renegades pursued actions that would make them outcasts such as Joel Searby and William Kristol’s attempt to woe an independent candidate such as Jim Mattis or Mitt Romney. Chapters include an analysis of the institutional and material factors that influenced conservative public intellectuals, how identity -- especially being Jewish or Mormon -- factored into the level of fear of authoritarianism, the quid pro quo that made lawyers more likely to look the other way, and what Saldin and Teles call the “marginal value” of economists who showed little attempt to organize collectively against the nomination and election of Donald Trump. Benjamin Warren assisted with this podcast. Susan Liebell is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship (Routledge, 2013) and, most recently, “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” in the Journal of Politics (August 2020). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Should we understand the conservative elites of #Never Trump as homogeneous and united? Failed renegades? Moral guardians of republicanism and values? In their new book Never Trump: The Revolt of the Conservative Elites (Oxford University Press, 2020), Robert P. Saldin (Professor of Political Science at the University of Montana) and Steven M. Teles (Professor of Political Science at Johns Hopkins University) analyze the strategies and motivations of the Never Trump conservatives to paint a vivid picture of the movement that Liz Mair called “the political equivalent of a doomed species.” Their nuanced analysis of the professional and intellectual circles of the extended Republican party network who made up the Never Trump movement, concludes that conservative elites who opposed Trump did so for varying reasons, using disparate methods. Based on interviews with 62 elites (and provided emails and other communications), Saldin and Seles portray the foreign policy elites as a professional class -- zealous moderates and reluctant partisans -- who nevertheless stepped forward to isolate “crazies.” They objected not only to the issues but Trump’s temperament: the lying, cruelty, narcissism, and flagrant norm-violations. On the other hand, political operatives -- the pollsters, campaign consultants, fundraisers, and media experts -- were far less willing to publicly take a stand given their self-interest in employment with Republican campaigns. But Saldin and Teles’s analysis demonstrates that even within this self-interested group, renegades pursued actions that would make them outcasts such as Joel Searby and William Kristol’s attempt to woe an independent candidate such as Jim Mattis or Mitt Romney. Chapters include an analysis of the institutional and material factors that influenced conservative public intellectuals, how identity -- especially being Jewish or Mormon -- factored into the level of fear of authoritarianism, the quid pro quo that made lawyers more likely to look the other way, and what Saldin and Teles call the “marginal value” of economists who showed little attempt to organize collectively against the nomination and election of Donald Trump. Benjamin Warren assisted with this podcast. Susan Liebell is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship (Routledge, 2013) and, most recently, “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” in the Journal of Politics (August 2020). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Rachna needs Rachel to get a grip. Monica Seles was the youngest woman to ever be ranked #1 in women’s tennis. She stayed at the top for three consecutive years, despite intense media criticism for not fitting the mold of the very traditional sport. In 1993, at a tournament in Hamburg, Seles was poised to once again face her arch tennis rival Steffi Graf at semis, but never made it past the quarterfinals after a deranged fan jumped on the court and attacked her; forever altering her game. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is the impact of a health condition on the individual’s ability to lead a fulfilling life. Researchers have identified determinants of HRQL in stroke survivors with aphasia to include communication, mobility, mental/emotional health, role, and social functioning. The use of patient-reported outcomes to capture HRQL in people with aphasia may better facilitate client-centered treatment approaches in this population. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/speech-uncensored/message
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is the impact of a health condition on the individual's ability to lead a fulfilling life. Researchers have identified determinants of HRQL in stroke survivors with aphasia to include communication, mobility, mental/emotional health, role, and social functioning. The use of patient-reported outcomes to capture HRQL in people with aphasia may better facilitate client-centered treatment approaches in this population. Visit the show notes for additional resources: https://www.speechuncensored.com/podcastepisodes/s3e23
Matt Zemek and Mert Ertunga join Saqib Ali to relive some of the classic trends from the French Open. The conversation focuses on the type of game that is suited to succeed on the clay of Roland Garros. Mert breaks down the evolution of classic styles from a pure baseliner to attacking players. Seles vs Graf battles from the 90's are used as illustrations on how the playing trends kept evolving even from the baseline. The conversation covers some of the iconic finals like Lendl vs McEnroe, Evert vs Navratilova and also some of the underrated ones like Courier vs Bruguera. A lot of detail packed in here for a nostalgic tennis fan.
Matt Zemek and Mert Ertunga join Saqib Ali to relive some of the classic trends from the French Open. The conversation focuses on the type of game that is suited to succeed on the clay of Roland Garros. Mert breaks down the evolution of classic styles from a pure baseliner to attacking players. Seles vs Graf battles from the 90's are used as illustrations on how the playing trends kept evolving even from the baseline. The conversation covers some of the iconic finals like Lendl vs McEnroe, Evert vs Navratilova and also some of the underrated ones like Courier vs Bruguera. A lot of detail packed in here for a nostalgic tennis fan.
Monica Seles’ 6-2, 3-6, 10-8 victory over Steffi Graf in 1992 is widely considered to be the best Roland Garros final of all time.Catherine, David and Matt explain how they felt while watching it and discuss some of the reasons why it was so special.We also hear from Graf’s coach at the time, Heinz Günthardt, who offers insight into why Seles caused Graf so many problems, especially on clay.New York Times journalist Christopher Clarey explains where the match ranks among the best he’s ever witnessed, and discusses the tragic interruption to their rivalry when Seles was stabbed in 1993.How did that incident change Seles as a person forever? In what way did it bind Graf and Seles together in a unique way? And how did it alter the course of tennis history?The Tennis Podcast is presented by Catherine Whitaker and David Law, featuring Matt Roberts. It is produced weekly year-round, and daily during the Grand Slam tournaments. It is crowdfunded by listeners each December.* NEWSLETTER *Sign up to get our news, isolation diaries and Matt’s Stat - http://eepurl.com/gbmzRX* ROLAND GARROS RE-LIVED *We are producing daily shows throughout the original Roland Garros dates, looking back on 15 classic matches and stories from the tournament’s history. You can watch the 1992 final between Steffi Graf and Monica Seles in full on YouTube. Tomorrow we will be going back to Gustavo Kuerten’s first title in 1997. His final against Sergi Bruguera is also available on YouTube. We will also be doing editions for Wimbledon.* EMAIL *We hope that the podcast helps to provide some form of escape during these challenging times. If you ever feel like writing to us, our e-mail is open – info@tennispodcast.net*REDDIT *We have a sub-reddit page! It's a growing online community where more than 875 listeners chat about the show and all things tennis. Join in - https://www.reddit.com/r/thetennispodcast/*SOCIAL MEDIA *Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/thetennispodcast/Twitter - https://twitter.com/TennisPodcast See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
We begin this week’s Tennis Re-Lived in 1992 when Gabriela Sabatini won her fourth title in Rome, beating Monica Seles in her prime in the final.How come Sabatini had such a special connection with Rome? In what way did she manage to make Seles’ game seem a bit limited in that match? And why have Sabatini’s achievements faded from tennis conversation?Then, we go back to 2006 to cover Rafael Nadal’s epic five set win over Roger Federer. In what way was Nadal kryptonite for Federer in this period? How has he developed his game since then? And might victory for Federer have changed the course of his rivalry with Nadal on clay?The Tennis Podcast is presented by Catherine Whitaker and David Law, featuring Matt Roberts. It is produced weekly year-round, and daily during the Grand Slam tournaments. It is crowdfunded by listeners each December.* NEWSLETTER *Sign up to get our weekly news, isolation diaries and Matt’s Stat - http://eepurl.com/gbmzRX* TENNIS RE-LIVED *Our Tennis Re-Lived series will return on Sunday 24th May for the first of our Roland Garros daily shows. Keep an eye on our social media channels in the coming days for details of the matches we will be covering. We will also be doing editions for Wimbledon.* EMAIL *We hope that the podcast helps to provide some form of escape during these challenging times. If you ever feel like writing to us, our e-mail is open – info@tennispodcast.net*REDDIT *We have a sub-reddit page! It's a growing online community where more than 875 listeners chat about the show and all things tennis. Join in - https://www.reddit.com/r/thetennispodcast/*SOCIAL MEDIA *Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/thetennispodcast/Twitter - https://twitter.com/TennisPodcast See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
The actions of Gunter Parche changed the sport of tennis for ever on April 30, 1993. Monica Seles was on track to smash the record books until Parche, a Steffi Graf superfan, stabbed Seles during a changeover at the Hamburg tournament. Graf and Seles were lodged in a rivalry that was on track to redefine the sport. Seles remarkably came all the way back, meeting her great rival once again in the 1995 US Open Final.Come join the Patreon family for bonus content and ad-free episodes: https://www.patreon.com/openera Follow @OpenEraPod on Twitter! And say hello to @DesaiDevang while you're there.If merch is your thing, be sure to check out the store: https://bit.ly/merchera Or reach out to the show and say hey: podcast@openera.ca If you enjoyed today's show, please rate Open Era 5-Stars on Apple Podcasts.See you again next week for an all new episode of Open Era.
The actions of Gunter Parche changed the sport of tennis for ever on April 30, 1993. Monica Seles was on track to smash the record books until Parche, a Steffi Graf superfan, stabbed Seles during a changeover at the Hamburg tournament. Graf and Seles were lodged in a rivalry that was on track to redefine the sport. Seles remarkably came all the way back, meeting her great rival once again in the 1995 US Open Final.Come join the Patreon family for bonus content and ad-free episodes: https://www.patreon.com/openera Follow @OpenEraPod on Twitter! And say hello to @DesaiDevang while you're there.If merch is your thing, be sure to check out the store: https://bit.ly/merchera Or reach out to the show and say hey: podcast@openera.ca If you enjoyed today’s show, please rate Open Era 5-Stars on Apple Podcasts.See you again next week for an all new episode of Open Era.
Welcome to another edition of the ninja please podcast. episode 40 We start this week off with a Sweet water beer shout out. (00:05:05) Intro - (00:28:34) The Ninjas Give a Mortal Kombat Scorpions revenge movie review. (00:34:29) Seles and Makyo exchange “Virtual Understanding” when they give us their week 1 review of Final Fantasy XII (2020 Remake) for the PS4. (00:43:55) Makyo Metal gives us insight into the #Pencilsdown movement bubbling on social media. (00:56:44) Does anyone here remember Dune? (01:00:30) Sam Remi has confirmed that he is intact directing the upcoming Doctor Strange: Multiverse of Madness so we further speculate the details of his involvement. Further in this segment, we take a deep dive into Ryan Renolds VS Hugh Jackman. Ryan Renold’s superhero success almost seems overnight to many, but true fans have been along for the ride for years. In the tail of this segment, we discuss complex universe tat was the Fox/Disney Xmen Era. (01:19:48) Back from break, The Ninja crew gets a surprise phone call that quickly went left. (01:22:27) Yuki has been doing a lot of reading during the cover pandemic and wants to share a few exerts from a story called Life Of The Cat Pimp: Legend of the Ice-cold Cat. (01:27:59) Johnny Deep Is a national treasure, yet in recent years domestic abuse allegations and public scrutiny have followed the star. Tabloids and Hollywood blogs continue to kindle the flames misfortune, yet the star remains ever vigilant in his quest to set the record straight. No tool could be greater used for their than Social Media. Deep who is typically a private person outside of the silver screen has recently joined Instagram to thank his fans for their unwavering support. We also review Lil Dicky’s new show DAVE on FXX (01:39:31) We close out part 1 of this episode with a review of IT. Chapter 2 and cap it off with a crash course in adapted mythology. Original Music by Starman - Fun Fun Dayo - Lucky Star OST Get Money - Junior Mafia (Instrumental) Nipsey Cuddles is the IP of The Ninja Please Podcast. 2020 Star Superior, LLC on social media @Ninjapleasepod Black is selling Ninjaplease march on his page @ Tee Public, feel free to check it out https://www.teepublic.com/user/thecaveofcomics Find him on Twitter @Thecaveofcomics2.0 #Ninjapleasepodcast #covid19 #Coronapod #Anime #Hulu #Crunchyroll #Funimation #Animalcrossing #Nintendo #Sony #PS5 #Marvel #DC #DIsney #syfy #Cartoonnetwork #CN #Adultswim #usa #trending #memes #life #style #Ninjapleasepodcast #Amazonprimevideo #Hulu #Funimation #Crunchyroll #Hidive #Manga #Anime #BLERD #FFXII #Finalfantasy #ITCHapter2 #Catpimp #Xmen #Deadpool #Dune #MK #MortalKombat #dave #FX #Fxx #HBO
Welcome to the Mini-Break powered by Diadem, your daily podcast for the biggest storylines, results, and controversies from the tennis world. On today’s episode, host Alex Gruskin declares which of Venus Williams, Justine Henin, and Monica Seles he considers to be the 5th most accomplished WTA player of the Open Era. He also runs through all of Thursday's news from the professional tennis world. Don’t forget to give a 5 star review with your twitter/instagram handle for a chance to win some FREE CR gear!! This episode brought to you by: Diadem Helping tennis players elevate their game by designing the most innovative performance tennis gear on the planet. Visit their store today and use the code "CR50" at checkout to save 50% off your order!!! ArrowBar Visit https://arrowbar.com and enter code CRACKED30 at checkout for 30% off any order. Tennis Channel Podcast Network Visit https://www.tennis.com/pro-game/podcasts/ to stay current on the latest tennis news and trends and enjoy in-depth analysis and dynamic debates. Find Cracked Racquets Website: https://www.crackedracquets.com Instagram: https://instagram.com/crackedracquets Twitter: https://twitter.com/crackedracquets Facebook: https://Facebook.com/crackedracquets YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC12ZE3jU0n52JkeWV1TB21A Email Newsletter: https://www.crackedracquets.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Neste episódio da série Quarentena Literária uma viagem pelo mundo dos filmes. Ouvimos cineastas, produtores, escritores, bibliotecária acerca da 7ª arte e, através de dicas, o que podemos extrair dela nestes áridos momentos de reclusão. O resultado ficou surpreendente e serve como um guia cinematográfico alusivo à infeliz situação pandêmica que assola o mundo. Nossos convidados: Marc Dourdin - cineasta documentarista - @marcdourdin (instagram) Suzi Soares - produtora cultural - @suzi.a.soares (instagram) Jorge Filholhini - escritor e autor do livro Somente nos Cinemas - @jorge.filholini (instagram) Carolina Cavalcanti Pedrosa - escritora e autora do livro Cartas aos Cinéfilos - @cartasdecarolina (instagram) Tiago Barreiro - cineasta e jornalista - @tiago_augusto (twitter)* Kety Valencio - bibliotecária - @livrariafricanidades/ @kettyburcy (instagram) Tânia Seles - editora do site las pretas - @tanseles / @laspretas_ (instagram) *Ps: Assista gratuitamente o filme Joana D´arc - direção de produção do nosso convidado Tiago Barreiro. O filme é uma animação com marionetes, e possui o apoio do Governo Francês: https://vimeo.com/304757131 Siga-nos | Instagram: @podcastrabiscos | @tadeufrodrigues | @jessicabalbino_ |email: podcastrabiscos@gmail.com |
What do you know about Zina Garrison? We undertook this episode because we knew we didn’t know enough. Zina Garrison is often seen as a bridge between Althea Gibson and the Williams sisters, a trailblazer along with Lori McNeil; but, we want to spend some time highlighting her own accomplished career and electrifying game. We look at Garrison’s unique story and ask what it tells us about tennis history and where we are now. With the benefit of hindsight, how do we view Zina differently in 2020 than journalists did in 1985? How do we situate her achievements? And why doesn’t the tennis world -- including us, up until a few days ago -- know more about Zina Garrison? 0:30 What we hope to accomplish with this episode and what our reservations are 6:10 Zina’s resume - gold medal, 14 titles, Wimbledon runner-up 10:10 Zina’s origins - Houston, Texas baby 14:00 What did her game look like? The speed, volleys, slice, overhead, and the wiggle 22:15 Wimbledon 1990, a run for the ages: Zina beats Sukova, Seles, Graf and garners a million in endorsements 35:15 You can’t tell Zina Garrison’s story without Ora Washington, Althea Gibson, and of course, Lori McNeil 43:00 How Zina was covered by the 1980s/90s sports media: poverty, insularity, and underachievement 53:40 What was it like to be a black woman in the 1980s WTA? 60:45 Zina’s post-career philanthropy and activism: the Zina Garrison Academy welcomes tens of thousands of kids, free of charge 72:00 Reflecting on what we learned, and Garrison’s place in the game
Funderar du på att bära ditt barn i sjal eller sele? Vad ska man tänka på när man använder sjal, när kan man börja bära barnet i sjal eller sele, vilka fördelar har bärsjal och vad är det för skillnad på att bära med sjal eller sele.I detta avsnitt träffar vi Zarah Stolt, bära-barn-konsult och grundare till Näroteket. Zarah är utbildad i allt som rör barnbärande. I sin verksamhet så hyr hon även ut bärsjalar vilket gör att hon är expert på alla modeller och varianter som finns på marknaden. I detta avsnitt: Skillnader på sjal eller seleSäkerhet när man bär i sjalKan man knyta sjalen för hårtHur ska barnet sitta i bärsjalenVad är skillnaden mellan olika sjalarSka man bära på rygg eller mage?Följ oss gärna i sociala medier: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/babyhjalp/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/babyhjalp/Prenumerera gärna på vår nyhetsbrev. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
It's clear that from the moment Monica Seles arrived on the tennis stage as a precocious teenager, the tennis world didn't quite know what to do or say about her. She's been constructed as, at varying times: the grunting and giggling wunderkind, an enigmatic superstar, a tragic victim of violence, a worldwide symbol of resilience, and the tour's elder stateswoman. In this episode, we try to make sense of the creation of Monica Seles as a public figure, by combing through the journalism written about her and several books written by her. How did we arrive at the Monica we 'know' today? How do we make sense of her incomprehensible stabbing? Does tennis know how to reckon with this superstar and her place in history? What this isn't: it's not a comprehensive biography, not a litigation of who's The Greatest, nor is it a deep dive into the Seles-Graf rivalry and relationship. This is instead about trying to understand how sports media creates celebrity, how patterns are repeated through generations, and a reminder that your heroes are complicated. :30 Why are we doing this episode? 6:45 The first stage of Monica discourse: prodigy and peculiarity (1988-90) 15:45 Grand Slam debut at 1989 Roland Garros 20:45 Seles' run of firsts in 1989/1990 and the Bolletieri falling out 30:25 The second phase: dominance and drama (1991-93) 33:20 The '91 Wimbledon withdrawal and reappearance at Mahwah 46:30 Let's talk about the endless grunting conversation, which blew up at 1992 Wimbledon 57:00 The stabbing and the subsequent 27-month hiatus (1993-95) 75:20 Monica's return to the WTA Tour, entering another phase of Monica discourse: embraced and beloved (but often underestimated) champion (1995-present) 83:00 Assessing Monica's post-comeback career: full of contradictions and lots of greatness
Par to, cik svarīga kopā būšana, saskaņa ar sevi un dabu, kā arī to, ka ikkatram ir savs dzīves uzdevums, pastāstīja dvēseles pavadone un augu sieva Inin Nini. Viņa aicināja uzņemties līderību un darīt tās lietas, ko katra savā vietā unikāli dara, neaizmirst par jaunu vērtību modināšanu un kā vārdā tas tiek darīts. Inin Nini ir vairākas pārliecības, kas dzīves gaitā tapušas skaidras. Pirmkārt, katram no mums ir sava dvēseles misija un savs uzdevums. Otrkārt, mēs šeit esam nākuši, lai mācītos, kā arī radītu unikālu, neatņemamu pienesumu, uzsverot, ka: “Mūsos ir ieprintēts dievišķais uzdevums. Vienīgais jautājums - cik mēs ļoti šajā mācību procesā, esam drosmīgas, tiekot galā ar izaicinājumiem?”.
"Emīla nedarbi”, "Ziemassvētku jampadracis”, „Ūdensbumba resnajam runcim”, „Ezera sonāte”, "Tereona galva" un citas ir skatītāju mīlētas režisora Vara Braslas filmas. Kopumā viņa radošajā kontā ir 15 spēlfilmu, četras no tām godalgotas ar „Lielā Kristapa” balvu. Novērtējot viņa izcilo ieguldījumu, tieši Varis Brasla šī gada „Lielā Kristapa” ceremonijā tiks sumināts par mūža ieguldījumu kino mākslā. Latvijas Radio viesojas Lielā Kristapa Mūža balvas ieguvējs, režisors Varis Brasla un viņa dzīvesbiedre aktrise Vizma Kalme. Sarunā raidījumā Kultūras Rondo kā pieturas punkti ir dažas no Vara Braslas uzņemtajām filmām. Viena no tām "Emīla nedarbi”. "Katrs "ķinis" man ir gabaliņš no miesas, dvēseles vai dzīves. Emīls..., nesarkstu šodien skatoties. Nedomāju, ka būtu novecojis pēc būtības. Tāda ir mana sajūta," vērtē Varis Brasla. Viņš atklāj, ka savas filmas skatoties vienmēr redz divas filmas - to, ko redzu un dzird visi un otru - iekšējo, kas ir aizkadra dzīve. "Saka, ka grāmatā starp rindām ir autors tā mirkļa stāvoklī. Arī skatoties ķini, piemēram, kādreiz kolēģu materiālu Rīgas kinostudijā. Viss ir pareizi un kaut kas nav. Pēc tam es uzzinu, ka bijusi ļoti smaga filmēšanas diena, dažādi blakusapstākļi traucējuši darbam. Tas arī uz ekrāna ir jūtams. Bet Emīls man aiziet normāli," atklāj režisors. "Jāsaka, par viņu runājot, kino un teātra režisors. Kino ir jāsaka pa priekšu. Arī visas veiksmes, nesaku, ka teātrī nav bijušas veiksmes vai nominācijas, tomēr kinocilvēkiem tas kino iesēžas tā dziļi, dziļi," atzīst Vizma Kalme. Viņa atklāj, ka ir spēlējusi gan Vara Braslas izrādēs, gan vairākās viņa veidotās filmās. "Bet man tas ir ārkārtīgs atbildības slogs. Zinu, ka uz mani skatīsies ar dubultu aci," atzīst aktrise un vērš jauno aktrišu uzmanību uz to, "ja viņas domā, ka būt režisora kundzei ir rozēm kaisīts ceļš uz pilnību un lomām, viņas maldās". Raidījuma laikā Varis Brasla stāsta arī par filmu "Aija" un "Mērnieku laiki" tapšanu. Savukārt viņa aktrises Madara Dišlere (Ida "Emīla nedarbos") un Zane Leimane (Linda "Ūdensbumba resnajam runcim") atminas filmēšanas laiku un vēl režisoram uzņemt jaunas filmas.
French Open Champion and Croatian Fed Cup Captain IVA MAJOLI is a consistent force in the tennis world. As a child, she travelled from wartime Croatia to Bradenton Florida in order to hone her craft at the Bollettieri Academy. As a pro, she quarter-finaled the Australian Open AND Wimbledon and got to #4 in the world. And in 1997, at the age of 20 she shocked the tennis world by stopping Martina Hingis in the finals of the only major Hingis lost that year. She's posted wins over Davenport, Martinez, Seles, and Sabatini and many more. And now along with her captaining the Croatian Fed Cup team, she is on the WTA board, is a co-tournament director and is fast becoming a tennis mom. On this episode, IVA MAJOLI explains what happens to the mentality of the draw when the #1 seed looses in an early round. Especially when that #1 is an unbeatable Steffi Graf. She also breaks down her unique relationship with Donna Vekic. And she lets us know what she thinks of the WTA limiting the play of young players like Coco Gauff. (Recorded September 4, 2019. Released October 16, 2019). UNDER REVIEW is a podcast in which tennis insiders share unique stories and insightful perspective. For more information, please contact: info@underreviewtennis.com SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: For other episodes of UNDER REVIEW with alumni from the Bollettieri Academy, check out: Tommy Haas [Ep4]; Paul Annacone [Ep15]; Jim Courier [Ep23]; Anne White [Ep34]; Andre Sa [Ep35]; Jimmy Arias [Ep35]. And for an episode with the legendary coach himself, check out: Nick Bollettieri [Ep28]. To watch highlights of Iva's epic win over Martina Hingis, check out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=be87AjJQ-dw KEYWORDS: Bollettieri Academy, Coco Gauff, Croatia, Donna Vekic, Fed Cup, Goran Ivanisevic, IMG Academy, Lindsay Davenport, Martina Hingis, Nick Bollettieri, Roland Garros, St. Petersburg, Stefi Graff, tennis mom, WTA
Avril 1993. Monica Seles, reine incontestable du tennis, est poignardée en plein match, au changement de côté, dans un stade comble et devant les caméras du monde entier. Une agression inimaginable qui a stoppé net celle qui fut la plus jeune numéro 1 de l'histoire. Exécution de menaces de mort de groupes extrémistes en pleine guerre yougoslave, son pays d'origine? Acte isolé d'un fanatique de Steffi Graf, sa rivale? Ce fait divers va coller à la peau d'une joueuse restée traumatisée à vie, victime de la jalousie du circuit, d'une presse hostile et de menaces de mort. Retour sur le “11 septembre du tennis”, comme le qualifiera la WTA.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.
Bientôt dans vos oreilles: reprise, le podcast des petites et grandes histoires du tennisHébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.
"What kind of computer system am I running here—is it Apple or is it Microsoft? We need to speak the same language and the language of the player is more important than my language." Longtime ATP and WTA coach Sven Groeneveld joins the podcast in the midst of the busiest time of the year for players announcing coaching changes. His lengthy coaching resume includes the likes of Monica Seles, Michael Stitch, Caroline Wozniacki, Ana Ivanovic, Tommy Haas and Fernando Verdasco, to name a few. In March, Groeneveld parted ways with Maria Sharapova after four years of working together. Groeneveld explains how he got into coaching, including how he got paired up with Seles in the early 1990s (05:28). The 53-year-old shares who he learned the ropes from (07:27), what players should look for in finding the right coach (12:38) and how he has dealt with abruptly switching player boxes (19:17). He also addresses the reasons behind the fast-moving coaching carousel, especially on the WTA tour (22:12), and adds his opinions to the on-court coaching debate (24:21). A program for teaching and licensing pro coaches doesn’t exist to his standards, and Groeneveld hopes the tours will invest in making a pathway for current playing pros to transition into coaching (26:46). He is already doing his part to connect coaches with the right players and clubs as he helped create OrangeCoach.com, a job placement site with over 20,000 registered coaches (29:39). And finally, sourcing from his three decades of experience touring the world as a professional coach, Groeneveld shares his Top 5 career moments (32:56). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
There has been a lot of talk lately about who is better: Jordan or Lebron. Who is the GOAT! But we like going bigger on the Q. Who is the GOAT of all time! The best athlete of them all. And on this episode of the show, Mark decides he is going to throw out his pick for greatest athlete of all time. Will guest Gary Weed accept Mark's athlete or will he stand firm that Mark might be crazy in this thinking. Also, Trump is still pissing off Kim Jong Un (who has earned it) during these peace talks with South Korea. The latest is that NK might pull out of the upcoming US/NK summit that was supposed to happen. Why is all this going on? We will discuss and break it down...plus.... Mark explains his thoughts on second hand and third hand smoke after a new article came out and Mark caught some flack for his stance.
After a week when the Munich, Estoril and Prague titles were all won by home favourites, attention now turns to Madrid, which is a veritable who’s who of the best, healthy tennis players in the world. Catherine Whitaker, sitting in a car park, and David Law in a window-less room, go through a draw that has thrown up some corkers. The wins of Alexander Zverev in Munich, Petra Kvitova in Prague and Joao Sousa in Estoril are covered, and David wants to know why Portugal, where Sousa’s triumph was celebrated, has produced so few top players over the years.The awful stabbing of Monica Seles is remembered, 25 years on. Just how good could she have been if that had not happened?Seles features in many listeners’ memories of the best matches of the 1990s.The Tennis Podcast is produced weekly throughout the year and daily during the Grand Slam tournaments, in association with Telegraph Sport and Eurosport. It is presented by Catherine Whitaker (Eurosport) and David Law (BBC 5 Live, BT Sport). See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
We're back with a bit of a mixed bag for episode 88. We begin with a podcast announcement before segueing into the tennis action post-Wimbledon: Novak is done for the year, Andy and Kim are inducted into the Hall of Fame, and David Ferrer resuscitates his career in Bastad. We then parse through the Nastase ITF ban, James takes another tennis quiz, and we introduce the TBS Mailbag! Seriously, we had such a blast answering Twitter questions from some of our listeners. Finally, we close with a segment on some of this year's Emmy nominations. 01:10 TBS announcement 04:47 Novak is out for the rest of the year 08:14 Looking back at Kim and Andy's Hall of Fame careers 14:10 David Ferrer is feeling himself again 16:03 Here we are again: horrendous security at tennis matches 18:13 A Seles side note, pondering the many what ifs 21:58 A Goerges dressing down, a very lucky loser, and weddings galore 25:12 Parsing through the Nastase ITF verdict 29:36 James takes a quiz; SURELY you all can beat him this time around 35:28 TBS Mailbag: we get a bit personal & have a blast! Thanks y'all! 55:55 Emmy nominations chit chat
Corrien els primers anys de la dècada dels noranta i l’antiga Iugoslàvia estava inmersa en el conflicte que acabaria per desintegrar-la. D’origen serbi, 4 guardaespatles vetlaven permanentment per la seua seguretat, però aquell dia no li van servir de res. En només un instant, una carrera brillant es truncaria per a sempre. Un 30 d’abril apunyalaven per l’esquena Mónica Seles mentre disputava els quarts de final del torneig d’Hamburg.
History and the Internet The Internet is a phenomenon studied from a wide variety of academic disciplinary perspectives, from those of sociology, to political science, to psychology, to philosophy. But there is scope for a more thorough application of historical knowledge in this area. This event will seek to provide an historical perspective in order better to appreciate the significance and implications of the Internet. A mixture of academic historians and practitioners from institutions such as Parliament and The National Archives will take part. Subjects considered will include: The impact of earlier communications technologies, in particular the printing press; Historical perspectives on big data; and The implications of the Internet for the work of historians, archivists and government institutions. 1 December 2016 - 09:00 am - 13:00 pm Council Room, King's College London
Inspired by the returning Juan Martin del Potro, BBC 5 Live and BT Sport commentator David Law, and Eurosport presenter Catherine Whitaker discuss the most memorable tennis comebacks of all time - those that turned out well, and those that didn't Hear about Seles returning from being stabbed. Agassi's response to plummeting to 141 in the world. Capriati being irrelevant in the game for 5 years and returning to win Slams. Clijsters having a baby and then winning big. And many more. The Tennis Podcast is produce in association with Telegraph Sport. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
sta semana dimos un repaso a los fichajes bomba que se dieron en las ligas de Europa y el papel de los mexicanos en sus nuevos equipos. Lo mejor que le pudo pasar al Chicharo fue fichar por el Bayern 04 Leverkusen y estamos seguros que jugar en este equipo le ayudará a recuperar su nivel. Dimos un repaso al torneo pre olímpico de basquetbol que se está llevando a cabo en la ciudad de México y cómo está la MLB en su recta final de la temporada. La figura de la semana se la dedicamos al Pelón Osuna, quien fue el máximo exponente del deporte blanco en la historia de México. En el archivo cachirul revivimos una de las más grandes rivalidades del Tenis femenino con la final del US Open entre Steffi Graf y Mónica Seles. El TOP10 recordamos cuáles han sido los peores fichajes de mexicanos en equipos Europeos que tras probar suerte por el viejo continente regresaron a la LigaMX sin pena ni gloria. En vivo todos los martes a las 9pm a tráves de www.mixlr.com/ClubNawtico El show es conducido por: Claudio Quiroz @ elclau Manuel Tenedor @ ManuelTenedor Miguel Angel garro @ El_Androide Alejandro Jácome @ Alejandro_jaco Jorge Díaz en controles y producción @ cyanidecoke Visita nuestras redes sociales: Facebook: LostCachirules Twitter: @ LostCachirules Instagram: @ LostCachirules
We speak to Laureus Academy Member Monica Seles who was the dominant player in womens tennis in the early 1990s and at 16 became the youngest ever winner of the French Open. In her career Seles won nine Grand Slam titles â the Australian Open four times, the French Open three times and the US Open twice
We speak to Laureus Academy Member Monica Seles who was the dominant player in womens tennis in the early 1990s and at 16 became the youngest ever winner of the French Open. In her career Seles won nine Grand Slam titles â the Australian Open four times, the French Open three times and the US Open twice
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
