Podcasts about btng

Ein Pferd schnappt - zag ein Schlag auf die Nase. Bestrafungen gehören für viele zum täglichen Umgang mit ihren Pferden. Ob es ein Schlag, ein reißen am Strick oder auch das Einschüchtern des Pferdes ist.Und das ist im Umgang mit Pferden nicht nur nicht notwendig, sondern schlichtweg falsch.Warum, erfahrt ihr in Folge 8. 

Quellen: 
https://scholar.google.de/scholar?hl=de&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=horses+positive+reinforcement+punishment&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1723386469684&u=%23p%3DjGmweD1EWY8J

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159122001095
Ines & Bride (2007). „Negative versus positive reinforcement: An evaluation of training strategies for rehabilitated horses“.
https://scholar.google.de/scholar?hl=de&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=punishment+horses&oq=punishment+h#d=gs_qabs&t=1723386564450&u=%23p%3Dt8pjkg8NB7sJ

Arnon served in the Israeli Air Force intelligence unit which was operating in Gaza during the early 2000s. A few years later, once the war with Lebanon broke out, he decided to stop serving in the military. Throughout the years he was active in different joint initiatives with Palestinians and other groups, and today works as an educator in a kindergarten and as an eco-therapist. Arnon is constantly in search of ways to liberate himself and others from the many systems of oppression that are linked together for himself and for generations to come.  Support this podcast on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Yehavit   ***** A few important disclaimers: This podcast is created and funded by me privately. I don't belong to any organization, nor does it represent anyone other than myself. Secondly, I don't intend this content to provide a justification or excuse for the actions people interviewed did in their past, but rather to learn from their personal experiences and gain insight as to what the process of transformation looks like. Certain parts of the episode could be triggering for you, and I advise taking into consideration that some of the events discussed are morally and ethically challenging (to say the least). And lastly: I acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land on which I work as the indigenous people of this country and pay my respects to their elders, past and emerging. **** Thank you Roy Geva for the soundtrack You can contact me at @yehavit on Instagram (or write to yahavisinthezone@gmail.com if you're not on Instagram) **** Stuff we mentioned: . Underground ammunition factory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayalon_Institute  . The Hamas attack on the Park Hotel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passover_massacre  . Operation Defensive Shield: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Defensive_Shield  . Combatants for Peace: https://cfpeace.org/  . Uri Ben Eliezer: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=uri+ben+eliezer&btnG=  . Satyam Community: for more details contact: talyaya@gmail.com . Podcast in Hebrew about the history of Gaza: https://www.parotk.com/category/%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%93%D7%A7%D7%90%D7%A1%D7%98-podcast/%D7%A2%D7%96%D7%94-%D7%94%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%A8-%D7%94%D7%9C%D7%90-%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%9B%D7%A8/  "I Shall Not Hate”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Shall_Not_Hate

We know, we know, no one wants to talk about the end of life, death, or dying. But we are all going to die at some point, so let's put it all out in the open. How do the aged population think about death? Do they get lonely when those around them cross to the other side? Drs. Heard & Heard-Garris explore their mothers' experiences and feelings of grief, loss, and the trope of being a “strong Black woman.” In this episode of Flesh 'N Bold, our hosts explore who helps the helper b.k.a the strong Black woman, when she needs help, what about what to do when the future you expected is taken from you, and how do you avoid isolation? Listen up, grab your friends, your family, and your significant others and let Drs. Heard & Heard-Garris walk you through this interesting penultimate act with their mothers. And always, please like, share, and discuss!Producers: Nevin J. Heard and Nia J. Heard-Garris Music: “Clay”; “LA”; “Sneak Chase” by Podington BearReferencesMourning me: An interpretive description of grief and identity loss in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (uvic.ca)Disenfranchised Grief and Nonfinite Loss as Experienced by the Families of Death Row Inmates - Sandra J. Jones, Elizabeth Beck, 2007 (sagepub.com)https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C24&as_vis=1&q=help-seeking+behaviors+of+Black+women&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1714084107992&u=%23p%3DS8Z9q15Wt9oJ https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C24&as_vis=1&q=grief%2C+strong+Black+women&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1714084424140&u=%23p%3DQSZPuW9cEegJ https://www.caregiver.org/news/tips-supporting-senior-widowed-parent/ https://www.google.com/search?q=Nonfinite+grief+AND+aging&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS893US893&oq=Nonfinite+grief+AND+aging&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQIRigATIHCAQQIRigAdIBCDMwMjVqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Erfahre mehr über die Geschichte und Bedeutung des Internationalen Frauentages am 8. März! In dieser besonderen Folge des TalkingRed Podcasts sprechen wir mit Lena Hofbauer (VSStÖ – Verband Sozialistischer Student_innen in Österreich), Floria Dreisiebner (Sozialistische Jugend) und Carina Mayerhofer-Leitner (Junge Generation) über die Verbindung zwischen dem 8. März und der Arbeiterinnenbewegung, die Rolle des Feminismus innerhalb der Sozialdemokratie und die Geschichte des Feminismus in Österreich. Außerdem erfährst du mehr über die geplanten Aktivitäten rund um den 8. März in den steirischen Jugendorganisationen. Alle Links und Unterlagen zur Folge Studie zu Empathie bei Männern und Frauen: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=de&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=gender+differences+motivation+and+empathetic+accuracy&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1709830422630&u=%23p%3DM94xL0r9jacJ Standard-Artikel zur Nachteilen von Müttern bei Bewerbungen: https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000209222/frauen-mit-kindern-haben-bei-bewerbungsgespraechen-schlechtere-karten  Sozialistische Jugend Steiermark: https://www.sj-stmk.at/ https://www.instagram.com/sj_stmk/ VSStÖ Graz: https://vsstoe.at/graz/ https://www.instagram.com/vsstoe_graz/ Junge Generation Steiermark: http://www.jgsteiermark.at/ https://www.instagram.com/jgsteiermark/ Talking Red auf Instagram: talkingred.podcast

What if you could deliver your service like it was a product? No more custom scoping. Less pricing questions. More time back in your schedule. This is the promise of the productized service. A trend we've been seeing take creative services by storm these past few years. We've seen firms like Designjoy and Two Step Social offer pre-packaged services that operate a lot like the experience of buying a product. From their clear up front offers to their automated onboarding and engagement process. Whether you're thinking of productizing your service or you're just wondering what all the fuss is about, you're gonna love today's guest Philip Wallage. Philip is on a mission to end feast or famine freelancing and the way he does that is by helping creatives productize their service. Philip works with creatives to find a predictable way to package their offer so it can be more repeatable and scalable. Philip and I talked about what it means to productize your service, what types of services its good for, how to price your offers and how to get started testing the waters. You'll love this episode if: 1) You're still scoping projects on an hourly rate 2) You're wondering what productized services are 3) You want to reduce your work hours Step off the marketing treadmill when you get Low Energy Leads: https://read.lowenergyleads.com Connect with Philip Website: https://philipwallage.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/philipwallage/ Favorite Tools: https://www.philipwallage.com/freelancer-tools Design Thinking Studio "BTNG": https://www.btng.studio Productizer Crash Course: https://www.philipwallage.com/productizer-crash-course Connect with Lex Newsletter: https://read.lowenergyleads.com Website: https://lexroman.com Growthtrackers Live: https://lu.ma/growthgym Favorite Tools: https://supereasydigital.com/techtools Tools mentioned in this episode Some of the links below are affiliate links and I may get a small referral fee if you make a purchase at no cost to you. Zapier: https://zapier.com/ Attio: https://attio.com/  Calendly: https://calendly.grsm.io/supereasydig Circle: https://circle.so/ Podia: https://www.podia.com/ Kajabi: https://kajabi.com/free-trial Typeform: https://www.typeform.com/ Upcoming online events Crack the Code to Finding Your Buyers (Nov 9): https://www.crowdcast.io/c/grow Growthtrackers Live (most Fridays): https://lu.ma/growthgym Get Growthtrackers Guest Pass Your ticket to making smarter marketing bets. Stop throwing spaghetti at the wall and prove what works for you: https://joingrowthtrackers.com Sponsor This episode is brought to you by Janice Porter's LinkedIn Advantage program. If you're struggling to harness the full potential of LinkedIn to find the leads you want, get access to your exclusive one month free trial at https://podcastadvantage.janiceporter.com and take advantage of this free trial. Credits Episode edited by Ani Villarreal https://www.anivillarreal.com/  Music from Uppbeat (free for Creators!) | License code: CYHCUU5DLPVC8OTQ Thank you for being part of the Low Energy Leads community! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lex-roman/message

Today's episode is sponsored by my friends at Paleovalley.   Make sure to support this podcast by heading over to Paleovalley.com/NwJ and the 15% off discount will automatically be applied to your first order._____In this episode, we have the privilege of sitting down with Dr. Donald K. Layman, a renowned expert in the field of dietary protein and amino acids. Dr. Layman is a professor Emeritus in the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He's internationally recognized for his extensive research on muscle development, metabolic regulation for conditions like obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, and is a sought-after keynote speaker. We discuss the following:All about Dr. Donald LaymanExcess protein for kidneysProtein, water and kidneyAbsorption of proteinProtein and weight lossProtein for longevityStats on women breaking hipsResistance training and amino acidsProtein meal and fastingRecommended test for musclesAnimal vs plant proteinsProtein in milkProtein shake vs steakUpdates on amino acids on nutrition labelsTesting for amino acid levelsWhere to find Dr. Donald Layman_____RESOURCESWebsite: https://metabolictransformation.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/donlayman Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Dr.+Donald+Layman&btnG= ____CHECK OUT MY BOOK, Carnivore CureCHECK OUT MY SECOND BOOK, The Complete Carnivore Diet for Beginners: Your Practical Guide to an All-Meat LifestyleSIGN UP FOR MY WEEKLY NEWSLETTER_____ ADDITIONAL RESOURCESNutrition with Judy ArticlesNutrition with Judy Resources_____ FIND ME

Join me on this episode of "In the Zone" as I dive into a study conducted in 2003. This study seems to hold significance in validating the importance of flat ground velocities for pitchers, and I recently had an insightful conversation with a coach on this topic. Don't miss out on hearing my perspective and analysis on this matter. Tune in now!Link to study: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=flat+ground+velocity+to+mound+velocity+pitching&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1685920945409&u=%23p%3D0WYu0aLye2QJ Stay In the Zone

The show which can originally be found at kgov.com/crime [Updated June 13, 2021] - The death penalty is at the heart of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. - Salvation is presented in terms of crime and punishment. - The Bible is a criminal justice textbook. - Five of the Ten Commandments are for criminal justice - See below our list of ways to reduce crime. Murders per Million Source: See the FBI's 2018 Homicide Data Table 6 and the simple spreadsheet calculation. While many crimes go unreported, even sexual assaults, murder is almost always reported. This chart's statistics are highly reliable. Won't vs. Can't: Public policy should prioritize deterrence over inability. Human beings are almost infinitely creative. Thus, a government's top priority should be making it so that people won't commit crime rather than that they can't commit crime. List of Ways: Don't worry! Below, in our List of Ways to Reduce Crime, of the 25 specifics, none of them say, let's just stop shooting each other; don't judge; just love everyone; love God; all sins are equal; or forgive everyone. Flashback #1: Court TV interviews Bob Enyart regarding Scott Peterson's death sentence. Flashback #2: We purchased OJ Simpson's memorabilia at auction and then burned both his Hall of Fame Award and his Heisman '68 Jersey (which had been hanging in his Brentwood mansion) to call for the installation of a new criminal justice system in America. See KGOV.com/oj. Flashback #3: Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick as documented at ShadowGov.com and as an editor of the Wall Street Journal wrote, that Bill Clinton's rape of Juanita Broaddrick was an event that "in fact took place." Hear also Bob's worldwide exclusive interview with Juanita Broaddrick and with nurse Norma Rogers, her friend who found Broaddrick wounded and in tears shortly after the assault. Flashback #4: BEL aired never-before-heard Columbine recordings and we get to the real story (i.e., one murderer's Natural Selection t-shirt) behind the massacre, the search warrant application that was squashed that may have prevented the murders, and the disgraced sheriff's refusal to let SWAT intervene. Flashback #5: Check out Bob Enyart's phone call to Michael Jackson attorney's office on the very day that Mark Geragos threatened to sue anyone who "besmirched Jackson's reputation" and see the three pieces of information on the homosexual child molester that Bob gave to the Santa Barbara District Attorney. Flashback #6: Reporters whom we identify by name from the New York Times, the LA Times, and Reuters called for comment about the Planned Parenthood shooting in Colorado Springs. But as fake news they all refused to show the petition signature or even report that the kgov.com/hero Officer Garrett Swasey who was murdered by the pothead who shot up the mill had been helping us to try to stop all killing at that abortion mill, including by the abortionist. Flashback #7: After our meager effort to get justice for JonBenet failed, we presented our Clue that Breaks the Case and our Concise List of Inculpatory Evidence Against the Ramseys including in this 200,000+ views YouTube: Five of the Ten Commandments: Five of the Bible's Ten Commandments lay the foundation for a valid criminal justice system: - Do not murder (basis for the right to life and prohibiting crimes of bodily harm crimes) - Do not steal (basis for the right to own private property and prohibiting socialism and other economic crimes)- Do not commit adultery (basis for prohibiting extra-marital intimacy, etc.) - Do not bear false witness (prohibiting of kgov.com/perjury as the basis for the right to due process) - Do not covet (goes to establishing motive in court proceedings) See kgov.com/americas-criminal-code for our one-page long proposed criminal code that can replace a million pages of the country's current codes. Death Penalty at the Heart of the Gospel of Christ: Question: Do any New Testament people or books support execution?Answer: As shown directly in the verses below, Jesus, Paul, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts, Romans, Hebrews, Revelation, and an angel all give strong support for the death penalty. But first consider the case of an American mass murderer. Here are the New Testament scriptures this article quotes: "For if I am an offender, or have committed anything deserving of death, I do not object to dying; but if there is nothing in these things of which these men accuse me, no one can deliver me to them. I appeal to Caesar." -Apostle Paul, Acts 25:11 "Why do you also transgress the commandment of God because of your tradition? For God commanded, saying... 'He who curses father or mother, let him be put to death.' But you say..." -Jesus Christ, Mat. 15:3‑4 & Mark 7:8‑11 …rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. For [the governing authority] is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. -Paul, Rom. 13:3-4 And if anyone wants to harm them… he must be killed… -Apostle John, Rev. 11:5 he who kills with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints. -John, Rev. 13:10 Anyone who has rejected Moses' law dies (present tense) without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. Of how much worse punishment will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot. Hebrews 10:28‑29 [death penalty = deterrent for unbelief] "[we] are under the same condemnation, indeed justly, for we receive the due reward of our deeds; but this Man has done nothing wrong" -repentant criminal being executed Luke 23:40-41 Here are a few Old Testament scriptures for capital punishment: Be afraid of the sword for yourselves; for wrath brings the punishment of the sword, that you may know there is a judgment. Job 19:29 The righteous shall rejoice when he sees the vengeance… So that men will say, "Surely there is a reward for the righteous; Surely He is God who judges in the earth." Ps. 58:10‑11 "Whoever sheds man's blood, by man his blood shall be shed; for in the image of God He made man." Gen. 9:6 'take no ransom for the life of a murderer… but he shall surely be put to death' Num. 35:31‑33 "Will you profane Me among My people… killing people who should not die, and keeping people alive who should not live…?" Ezek. 13:19 Thus the death penalty still applies for murder, kidnapping, etc. But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless... for murderers [Ex. 21:16]... for perjurers... -Paul 1 Tim. 1:8-10 Finally, KGOV's New Testament Support for Capital Punishment explains that Christians should not advocate for the death penalty for the Mosaic symbolic offenses. Why not? For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law Hebrews 7:12 As of shortly after Christ's death, no government, not even Israel's, should punish, let alone execute, those who violate the symbolic ordinances which reinforced Israel's priestly role (Lev. 24:16; Mat. 15:4; etc.). Listener's Neighbors Murdered: Please pray for a BEL listener going to visit in jail a husband who turned himself in, who murdered his wife on Feb. 21, 2019. Both were Chuck's neighbors. Our listener will urge the murderer to forbid his defense attorneys from entering a not guilty plea, and even to dismiss them. Further, that he should not fight the death penalty. And, even if he asks God to forgive Him to save His soul (which would be wise, that should have no affect on the punishment that he is due in this life,

Welcome to another episode! Our guys are joined by close friend and listener Tobi Fadeyi, they sit to discuss his educational journey and what allowed him to stay dedicated to higher learning, music and chiropractic study. Remember to do all the things on all the things ! Time Stamps: 3:45 - Ed's Updates 14:12 - Ju's Updates 18:35 - Tobi explains his background 25:52: Tobi's undergrad/graduate journey 35:12 - Perseverance & finding chiropractic study 44:43 - Tobi discusses his research 53:45 - The QRS Complex Mixtape: https://m.soundcloud.com/tobi-fadeyi/sets/qrscomplex?ref=clipboard&p=i&c=1 Research Article: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C44&q=Tobi+fadeyi&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DqU8WGYvUipAJ

PamPam Cuap Show hadir dengan segmen baru yang (rencananya) akan hadir setiap episode akhir bulan. Kecuali di Episode kali ini. Sambutlah BTNG! Baru Tau Nih Gue! | Kirim Pesan Suara kalian ke: https://anchor.fm/pampam-cuap/message  Atau kirim email ke: coffeestory.pampam@gmail.com

Jonathan and Chris speak to Olivier Drouin, MD, MPH, a paediatrician and researcher in Montreal. The risk-benefit analyses regarding children, COVID-19, and the vaccines have received a lot of attention by journalists, parents, and peddlers of misinformation alike. “Myocarditis” is now a “boogeyword.” Olivier weighs in on how COVID affects children, the safety of the vaccines, and what to do about schools.   1:20 Not *that* Olivier Drouin 2:36 How COVID affects children 6:00 Risk factors 9:29 How Omicron affects children 13:25 Speculating on increased diabetes diagnoses 16:19 Vaccine safety in children and the focus on peri- and myocarditis 24:04 Vaccine hesitant parents 28:29 The school debate 41:58 Our elected officials 47:00 Research beyond COVID     * Theme music: “Fall of the Ocean Queen“ by Joseph Hackl.   To contribute to The Body of Evidence, go to our Patreon page at: http://www.patreon.com/thebodyofevidence/.   Patrons get a bonus show on Patreon called “Digressions”! Check it out!     Links: 1) Olivier Drouin on Twitter: https://twitter.com/olivierdrouinmd 2) Olivier Drouin on Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Olivier+Drouin%22&btnG= 3) Olivier Drouin on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/olivierdrouinmd/ 4) Jonathan's article on COVID aerosols and ventilation/filtration: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19/covid-19-air-both-problem-and-solution

برای این که بتونیم جلوی بیماری های دهان مثه پوسیدگی و بیماریهای لثه رو بگیریم باید دندونارو از میکروب و پلاک پاک کنیم ،اولین راه کاریم که به ذهن همه ی ماها میاد اینه که مسواک بزنیممهمترین حساسیتی که اینجا پیش میاد اینه که برای مسواک زدن از چه خمیردندونی استفاده کنم؟ به چن دسته تقسیم میشن خمیردندونا؟ چه نوعایی داره؟ کدومش به دردِ من میخوره؟لازمه عوضش کنم؟ بعد چن وقت؟کتابخونه و گوینده: نگین و عاطفهتدوین : علیرضا:لینک مقالاتhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Importance+of+Tooth+Brushing+in+Pediatrics&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DdrCnc7dQ9x0Jhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40368-019-00464-2https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=charcoal+toothpaste&oq=charcoal#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DPVRWdfnYdggJhttps://www.daniel-rouge.com/%D9%85%D8%B2%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%A7-%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%A8-%D8%AE%D9%85%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%86%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B2%D8%BA%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C-%DA%86%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%AE%D9%85%DB%8C/https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%D9%86%D8%AD%D9%88%D9%87+%DB%8C+%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%A8+%D9%88+%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%87+%D8%A7%D8%B2+%D8%AE%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%B1+%D8%AF%D9%86%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86+%D8%AF%D8%B1+%DA%A9%D9%88%D8%AF%DA%A9%D8%A7%D9%86&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DhuxryGAU9CgJ--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/negin-taqizade/message Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

Welcome to The Barrier Breakdown: Disrupting Mental Health! This week we are joined by Dr. Lina Begdache, an assistant professor in the Health and Wellness Studies department at Binghamton University, NY. She received her PhD in Cell and Molecular Biology with a Neuroscience concentration from Binghamton University. She earned a master's degree in Nutrition Sciences from the University at Buffalo, NY. Dr. Begdache is a Registered-Dietitian Nutritionist, a Certified Nutrition-Specialist-Scholar, a Certified Dietitian Nutritionist and a Fellow of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. You can find her articles on Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C39&q=lina+begdache&btnG=&oq=Lina+Begd) or here https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1028415X.2017.1411875 and here https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/1/24  All our upcoming continuing education events can be found at www.cbicenterforeducation.com    You can watch or listen to The Barrier Breakdown on any of the following streaming services: YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyc6xZzY7ra3L5pI2g5GKrw  Podbean - https://cbi.podbean.com  Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/2ETgUdDykWN96Tv26PWyZ2  Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-barrier-breakdown-disrupting-mental-health/id1546097545  Follow us on social media: CBI: https://www.facebook.com/CognitiveBehaviorInstitute  Center for Ed: https://www.facebook.com/CBIcenterforeducation  Instagram: @cognitivebehaviorinstitute  Twitter: CBI_Pittsburgh  :::::::::::::::::::: Music: Basic Majesty - Ashley Shadow Support by RFM - NCM: https://youtu.be/XVwlTTMgw5c ::::::::::::::::::::

Welcome back to Episode 2.2!On today's ep:Bonnie's age deterioration and half marathon training Averill's boring weeks The many reasons dolphins are superior to humans - featuring sex and mirrors, combined? Maybe! (Unfortunately not) Today we get into a few papers around dolphins and their incredible abilities. Can they recognise themselves in a mirror? Do they have sex for pleasure, and what the hell does their clitoris look like? That + more!Papers:Self recognition:https://www.pnas.org/content/98/10/5937Authors: Diana Reiss and Lori MarinoDolphin sex https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Functional+Morphology+of+the+Dolphin+Clitoris&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3Dv1VWyMrjuNYJAuthors: Dara Orbach and Patricia BrennanAuditory vigilance:https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/209/18/3621/16107/Dolphin-continuous-auditory-vigilance-for-fiveAuthors: Authors: Sam Ridgway, Don Carder, James Finneran, Mandy Keogh, Tricia Kamolnick, Mark Todd, Allen Goldblatt Brofins:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22668-1 Authors: Stephanie L. King, Richard C. Connor, Michael Krützen and Simon J. AllenIf you want to see our ever evolving social media pages and/or share your thoughts with us we are here:Instagram: @soundsscientificTwitter: @soundscientific (we're missing an S, blame Jack)We are a tiny podcast so do your act of kindness for the day and click those like/subscribe/follow/share buttons *views are our own and not the opinions of our employers or institution*We are a tiny podcast so do your act of kindness for the day and click those like/subscribe/follow/share buttons *views are our own and not the opinions of our employers or institution*

On this episode of the #dobetter podcast, Joe and Megan discuss what the phrase “Active Engagement” means to them. This episode is full of resources relating to creating Active Engagement and why it is a critical component for effective learning. Like the show? Please subscribe and leave a review to help us grow! Resources Discussed in the Show: https://www.marcus.org/autism-resources/autism-tips-and-resources/supporting-active-engagement https://autismnavigator.com/materials/about_active_engagement.pdf https://manualonautism.wordpress.com/supporting-communication/active-engagement/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C10&q=active+engagement+wetherby&btnG= https://pubs.asha.org/doi/full/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-RSAUT-18-0028 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10803-015-2615-2 Conine, D.E., Vollmer, T.R. and Bolívar, H.A. (2020), Response to name in children with autism: Treatment, generalization, and maintenance. Jnl of Applied Behav Analysis, 53: 744-766. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.635 Conine, D.E., Vollmer, T.R., Barlow, M.A., Grauerholz-Fisher, E., Dela Rosa, C.M. and Petronelli, A.K. (2020), Assessment and treatment of response to name for children with autism spectrum disorder: Toward an efficient intervention model. Jnl of Applied Behav Analysis, 53: 2024-2052. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.737

Ruthie Lerato and I talk about all manner of cool and interestings things; From Water PH and natural pestisides to a New Podcast she will be on, to being  women of Source!She will be co-creating a Podcast for Amethyst Retreat Center so be on the lookout for that information as well! Enjoy our fun rambling conversation!SCIENCE About Water PH: https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/abs/10.1139/w06-048https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740002007000962?casa_token=V238TT9c3 KwAAAAA:dZvpSPgRBkaJ6F_5m7hfBagbOjV5Mm5tcUXYDfoJMpSIuT-LCNWoKGdsusuajYC_ cEaHf2UXTwYhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C23&q=electrolyzed+reduced+water+pla nts&oq=electrolyzed+reduced+water+pl#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DVD6yTyhhBUUJhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C23&q=electrolyzed+reduced+water+pla nts&oq=electrolyzed+reduced+water+pl#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DaCslPa4ccwYJhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C23&q=electrolyzed+reduced+water+on +plants+crops+yield+fungus+pesticide+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3D42XZ0M4K1goJhttps://youtu.be/2Un_SpJqqJMLIKE our FB Page for Something Worth Saying!https://www.facebook.com/SomethingWorthSayingPodcastSTAY TUNED FOR JORDAN LEIGH WELLNESS'S VIRTUAL ONLINE YOGA, MOVEMENT & MEDITATION CHANNEL, CURRENTLY BEING CREATED AND SET TO RELEASE IN NOVEMBER 2021!Wellness Inquiries to work with Jordan Leigh directly: hello@jordanleigh.com DoTerra Essential Oils can be purchased at: https://www.doterra.com/US/en/site/nbwLink to our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JordanLeighWellness/

Life is stressful, especially all the external world events since approx 2016 than a global pandemic. If you are anything like me, finding new coping skills and releases is a MUST. I can no longer eat chocolate, that's not a long-term plan. I feel that being a childfree human has helped me during this pandemic that's for sure. I also felt I needed something with a simple technique and practice. In this episode my journey with Tapping EFT thus far and what has improved the most. Here are a few scholarly articles for reference. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381429/ (Clinical EFT (Emotional Freedom Techniques) Improves Multiple Physiological Markers of Health) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550830716301069 (A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Trials of Clinical Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) for the Treatment of Depression) My scholarly google searchhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C10&as_vis=1&q=eft+tapping&btnG= ( page.) I want to hear from you. Have you tried tapping? Here on over to Instagram https://www.instagram.com/notamomma/ (@notamomma), let's chat. https://www.instagram.com/notamomma/ (All the magic happens over on the gram. We must connect there. I am always open to DMs. ) Have you heard about Instagram Guides? Well, I made one for YOU. Check it out https://www.instagram.com/notamomma/guide/how-to-rock-being-not-a-momma/17842202624493284/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&utm_campaign=&utm_medium= (here.) https://app.telbee.io/channel/9ujev1chuvsiell5as1zjw (Leave a message, a question, an episode idea, or just say HELLO!) Of course, this podcast wouldn't be the same without your continued feedback, you can help with answer a few brief questions. https://raphaele.responsesuite.com/q/namlpodfeedback (Here it is. ) How can you support the podcast? Of course rate, review, and share. But there is another way! https://www.notamommalife.com/support/ (Check it out here). Are you a childfree man(identify as one)? I need your HELP. I want to make sure that there are episodes that you want to hear. You can help by answering ONE question on https://raphaele.responsesuite.com/q/childfreemen (this survey. )

Today on Mushroom Hour we are blessed by the presence of Ryan Paul Gates, founder of Terrestrial Fungi. Ryan has spent the last ten+ years collecting and breeding fungal cultures from around the world. The strains he is probably most famous for propagating and breeding are cordyceps and ganoderma mushrooms. Ryan was really an early pioneer at popularizing cordyceps cultivation in the US, exposing us to techniques used from all over the globe. His team at Terrestrial Fungi are constantly hunting and breeding new and improved strains to add to their already staggering genetic library. They are constantly refining our selection process to bring Cordyceps farmers reliable and high yielding potent genetics. In the summer of 2019, they collected over 200 wild Cordyceps militaris ascospore isolates from over 30 carefully selected wild specimens: building their work of releasing the first single ascospore progeny strains of Cordyceps militaris in the USA. A master manifester and elevator of vibration, you can tell Ryan puts the highest intention and care into his work.   TOPICS COVERED:   How Ryan Discovered a Passion for Fungi  Falling in Love with Cordyceps  Cordyceps militaris Decentralized Knowledge Share  Developing Cordyceps militaris Cultivation Techniques  Basics of Cordyceps militaris Biology  Balancing Open-Source Mentality, Economic Self-Interest and Concepts of Reciprocity Mechanics of Culturing Cordycep militaris Strains and Selecting Genetics  Birth of Terrestrial Fungi  Rethinking Ganoderma Taxonomy  Elucidating Ganoderma lucidum  Challenges of Breeding Ganoderma  Future Plans for Terrestrial Fungi  Advice for Breeding Fungi Strains  Guidance from Music, Spirit & Other Organisms in Following the Path of Fungi  EPISODE RESOURCES:    Terrestrial Fungi Website: https://www.terrestrialfungi.com/   Terrestrial Fungi IG: https://www.instagram.com/terrestrialfungi/   Terrestrial Fungi FB: https://www.facebook.com/TerrestrialFungi/   RusticRosette Website: https://www.rusticrosette.com/   Shroomery.org: https://www.shroomery.org/   Appalachian Gold Fungi: https://www.instagram.com/appalachiangold_fungi/   Cordyceps militaris "dendrite" strain (Fungi): https://www.terrestrialfungi.com/products/cordyceps-militaris-dendrite-liquid-culture   Dr. Robert Blanchette: http://forestpathology.cfans.umn.edu/Blanchette.htm   Google Scholar Cordyceps militaris Research: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=cordyceps+militaris&btnG=   Grifola frondosa (Fungi): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grifola_frondosa   

Como socializar um cachorro? Convidamos a Carla Ruas, Especialista em Comportamento e Bem-estar animal pra construir esse episódio junto com a gente. [Para ter uma experiência imersiva, coloque o fone de ouvido e feche os olhos] [Se preferir, pode ouvir normalmente também] Dog Voice é o podcast imersivo em 8D pra você entrar na cabeça dos cachorros e entender como eles pensam. Embarque nessa viagem até a mente dos cães. Siga a gente nas redes sociais: @dogvoicecast Créditos: Rafael Rodrigues (@solucoescaninas), Johnny Days - UX Sound Design e Diana Pereira Faça a nossa pesquisa e ajude a Dog Voice a melhorar ainda mais o podcast! https://forms.gle/GcQhQXnps5m2j7qJ8 Locução: Taiz Lenk Apoio: Carla Ruas Fontes: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Agnaldo_Garcia2/publication/320858791_A_Vida_e_a_Obra_de_Konrad_Lorenz_1903-1989/links/59ff015d458515d0706c5be2/A-Vida-e-a-Obra-de-Konrad-Lorenz-1903-1989.pdfhttps://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=fase+de+imprinting+em+filhotes&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3D0dH0VxOHNwsJ

Check out Terra Mater’s new video about the Skywalker Gibbon - and subscribe - at https://youtube.com/terramaterofficial. Most new species are discovered by amateurs because nowadays non-professionals are actually better suited to the requirements of new species “discovery.” LEARN MORE ************** To learn more about this topic, start your googling with these keywords: Taxonomy: The branch of science concerned with classifying organisms Taxonomic Impediment: The gaps in our taxonomic knowledge and the shortage of trained taxonomists and curators. Amateur Taxonomist: Someone who classifies organisms but is not paid to do so. Malacology: The study of mollusks, including snails and slugs. Type Specimen: The specimen used to officially describe a new species. SUPPORT MINUTEEARTH ************************** If you like what we do, you can help us!: - Become our patron: https://patreon.com/MinuteEarth - Share this video with your friends and family - Leave us a comment (we read them!) CREDITS ********* David Goldenberg (@dgoldenberg) | Script Writer, Narrator and Director Arcadi Garcia Rius (@garirius) | Illustration, Video Editing and Animation Nathaniel Schroeder | Music MinuteEarth is produced by Neptune Studios LLC https://neptunestudios.info OUR STAFF ************ Sarah Berman • Arcadi Garcia Rius David Goldenberg • Julián Gustavo Gómez Melissa Hayes • Alex Reich • Henry Reich Peter Reich • Ever Salazar • Kate Yoshida OUR LINKS ************ Youtube | https://youtube.com/MinuteEarth TikTok | https://tiktok.com/@minuteearth Twitter | https://twitter.com/MinuteEarth Instagram | https://instagram.com/minute_earth Facebook | https://facebook.com/Minuteearth Website | https://minuteearth.com Apple Podcasts| https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/minuteearth/id649211176 REFERENCES ************** Fontaine, B., van Achterberg, K., Alonso-Zarazaga, M. A., Araujo, R., Asche, M., Aspöck, H., Aspöck, U., Audisio, P., Aukema, B., Bailly, N., Balsamo, M., Bank, R. A., Belfiore, C., Bogdanowicz, W., Boxshall, G., Burckhardt, D., Chylarecki, P., Deharveng, L., Dubois, A., Enghoff, H., … Bouchet, P. (2012). New species in the Old World: Europe as a frontier in biodiversity exploration, a test bed for 21st century taxonomy. PloS one, 7(5), e36881. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036881. Mora C, Tittensor DP, Adl S, Simpson AGB, Worm B. (2011). How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean? PLOS Biology 9(8): e1001127. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127. Drew, L. (2011). Are We Losing the Science of Taxonomy? As need grows, numbers and training are failing to keep up., BioScience, 61:12 (942–946). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.4. Pearson, D., Hamilton, A., Erwin, T. (2011). Recovery Plan for the Endangered Taxonomy Profession. BioScience. 61:1 (58–63). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.11. Agnarsson I, Kuntner M. (2007). Taxonomy in a changing world: seeking solutions for a science in crisis. Syst Biol.56(3):531-9. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17562477/. Warren, R. (2019). The New Publish or Perish: Requirements for Jobs and Tenure. ASA Footnotes. $7:1. Retrieved from: https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/attach/footnotes/footnotes_jan-feb-19.pdf Leber, J. (2019). Species Sleuths: Amateur Naturalists Spark a New Wave of Discovery. Yale Environment 360. Retrieved from: https://e360.yale.edu/features/field-sleuths-the-amateur-naturalists-who-are-discovering-new-species Nuwer, R. (2013). A Rallying Cry For Naming All Species On Earth. New York Times. Retrieved from: https://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/24/a-rallying-cry-for-naming-all-species-on-earth/ Fraussen, Koen. Personal Communication (2020). Bus Driver, Public Transport Company, Flanders, Belgium. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=author%3A%22Fraussen+Koen%22&btnG=&oq=frauss Mora, Camilo. Personal Communication (2020). Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Hawaii. http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/mora/index.html

5 Lesser-Known Public Speaking Rules Every Young Professional Needs To Know - Part 5 Intro "Existing literature (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C9&q=public+speaking&btnG=) on the art of public speaking is extensive: ranging from preparation (https://www.nytimes.com/guides/year-of-living-better/how-to-speak-in-public) and confidence (https://www.businessinsider.com/10-strategies-to-become-a-more-confident-public-speaker-2019-12) to body language (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2015/11/17/what-to-do-with-your-hands-when-speaking-in-public/) and tonality (https://law.wisc.edu/academics/lawskills/oral_communication/course_manual/use_voice_effectively.html) , the list of ‘golden rules’ is abundant — but mechanical. The following five rules are lesser-known approaches to public speaking and will insert dynamism, nuance, and distinction to your communication toolbox." Forbes Magasine: Ali Shahbaz (https://www.forbes.com/sites/alishahbaz/?naturalID=blogAndPostId%2Fblog%2Fpost%2F50791-5f73f9f6afc59e0007bbb7e4&source=applenews#74c01fc162cd) Let's have a look at fifth of these 'lesser-known' approaches and see if it might help our preaching and teaching of God's word. 5. Remember the 95% rule "..they end at a point that allows audiences to remain inquisitive. This 5% grants listeners the breathing room to satiate their imagination, fulfill their intrinsic tendency for exploration, and look forward to their next public speech." “When they heard about the resurrection of the dead, some of them sneered, but others said, “We want to hear you again on this subject.”” (Acts 17:32 NIV11) One of our goals is to create curiosity. This will be compromised if we teach everything we have. People learn best when they are in charge of their own learning “On hearing this, Jesus said, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’ For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”” (Matthew 9:12–13 NIV11) Heuristic teaching style We want to generate thinkers and explorers, not robots and automatons Conclusion “At that, Paul left the Council. Some of the people became followers of Paul and believed. Among them was Dionysius, a member of the Areopagus, also a woman named Damaris, and a number of others.” (Acts 17:33–34 NIV11) Conviction comes when the seeker has sought for themselves, not been force-fed Question: "What will you deliberately leave out of your next lesson?" Please add your comments on this week’s topic. We learn best when we learn in community. Do you have a question about teaching the Bible? Is it theological, technical, practical? Send me your questions or suggestions. Here’s the email: malcolm@malcolmcox.org. If you’d like a copy of my free eBook on spiritual disciplines, “How God grows His people”, sign up at my website: http://www.malcolmcox.org (http://www.malcolmcox.org/) . Please pass the link on, subscribe, leave a review. “Worship the LORD with gladness; come before him with joyful songs.” (Psalms 100:2 NIV11) God bless, Malcolm PS: You might also be interested in my book: "An elephant's swimming pool" (https://dqzrr9k4bjpzk.cloudfront.net/images/9167082/379662794.jpg) , a devotional look at the Gospel of John mccx, Malcolm Cox, Watford, Croxley Green, teaching, preaching, spiritual disciplines, public speaking, corporate worship, Sunday Sample, Corporate Worship Matters, Tuesday Teaching Tips, Quiet Time Coaching, coaching, coaching near me, coach, online coaching, savior, quiet time, devotion, God, Jesus, Pray, prayer, malcolm’s, cox, Music: Purpose by Jonny Easton; https://youtube.com/channel/UCHJVYelCXpsV8P4EVWBgj0A Creative Commons Attribution license; Free Download / Stream: http://bit.ly/al-purpose; Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/TT2PftKt1P4

Intro "Existing literature (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C9&q=public+speaking&btnG=) on the art of public speaking is extensive: ranging from preparation (https://www.nytimes.com/guides/year-of-living-better/how-to-speak-in-public) and confidence (https://www.businessinsider.com/10-strategies-to-become-a-more-confident-public-speaker-2019-12) to body language (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2015/11/17/what-to-do-with-your-hands-when-speaking-in-public/) and tonality (https://law.wisc.edu/academics/lawskills/oral_communication/course_manual/use_voice_effectively.html) , the list of ‘golden rules’ is abundant — but mechanical. The following five rules are lesser-known approaches to public speaking and will insert dynamism, nuance, and distinction to your communication toolbox." Forbes Magasine: Ali Shahbaz (https://www.forbes.com/sites/alishahbaz/?naturalID=blogAndPostId%2Fblog%2Fpost%2F50791-5f73f9f6afc59e0007bbb7e4&source=applenews#74c01fc162cd) Let's have a look at the fourth of these 'lesser-known' approaches and see if it might help our preaching and teaching of God's word. 4. Be confidently vulnerable "Strong public speakers make themselves accessible to their audiences. They have the courage to acknowledge flaws and the confidence to promise improvement." Self-deprecation - yes Self-humiliation - no “I came to you in weakness with great fear and trembling. My (http://trembling.my/) message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirit’s power, so that your faith might not rest on human wisdom, but on God’s power.” (1 Corinthians 2:3–5 NIV11) Paul Spoke about himself in a way that would fit with the Corinthians' own experience of him Spoke about aspects of his feelings and character which were relevant to the situation that caused his writing to them Had God as its ultimate focus Conclusion The goal is not to make people feel sorry for you The goal is to level the playing field, creating connection and revealing application Question: "What personal information can you disclose in your next lesson which will help your point have more impact - in a healthy way?" Please add your comments on this week’s topic. We learn best when we learn in community. Do you have a question about teaching the Bible? Is it theological, technical, practical? Send me your questions or suggestions. Here’s the email: malcolm@malcolmcox.org. If you’d like a copy of my free eBook on spiritual disciplines, “How God grows His people”, sign up at my website: http://www.malcolmcox.org (http://www.malcolmcox.org/) . Please pass the link on, subscribe, leave a review. “Worship the LORD with gladness; come before him with joyful songs.” (Psalms 100:2 NIV11) God bless, Malcolm PS: You might also be interested in my book: "An elephant's swimming pool" (https://dqzrr9k4bjpzk.cloudfront.net/images/9167082/379662794.jpg) , a devotional look at the Gospel of John mccx, Malcolm Cox, Watford, Croxley Green, teaching, preaching, spiritual disciplines, public speaking, corporate worship, Sunday Sample, Corporate Worship Matters, Tuesday Teaching Tips, Quiet Time Coaching, coaching, coaching near me, coach, online coaching, savior, quiet time, devotion, God, Jesus, Pray, prayer, malcolm’s, cox, Music: Purpose by Jonny Easton; https://youtube.com/channel/UCHJVYelCXpsV8P4EVWBgj0A Creative Commons Attribution license; Free Download / Stream: http://bit.ly/al-purpose; Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/TT2PftKt1P4 

5 Lesser-Known Public Speaking Rules Every Young Professional Needs To Know - Part 3 Intro "Existing literature (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C9&q=public+speaking&btnG=) on the art of public speaking is extensive: ranging from preparation (https://www.nytimes.com/guides/year-of-living-better/how-to-speak-in-public) and confidence (https://www.businessinsider.com/10-strategies-to-become-a-more-confident-public-speaker-2019-12) to body language (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2015/11/17/what-to-do-with-your-hands-when-speaking-in-public/) and tonality (https://law.wisc.edu/academics/lawskills/oral_communication/course_manual/use_voice_effectively.html) , the list of ‘golden rules’ is abundant — but mechanical. The following five rules are lesser-known approaches to public speaking and will insert dynamism, nuance, and distinction to your communication toolbox." Forbes Magasine: Ali Shahbaz (https://www.forbes.com/sites/alishahbaz/?naturalID=blogAndPostId%2Fblog%2Fpost%2F50791-5f73f9f6afc59e0007bbb7e4&source=applenews#74c01fc162cd) Let's have a look at the third of these 'lesser-known' approaches and see if it might help our preaching and teaching of God's word. Use tactical silence "...the strategic use of silence nurtures this relationship as it provides space for absorption, and more importantly, reflection on your core message." “Jesus said to the man with the shriveled hand, “Stand up in front of everyone.” Then Jesus asked them, “Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill?” But they remained silent. He looked around at them in anger and, deeply distressed at their stubborn hearts, said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his hand was completely restored.” (Mark 3:3–5 NIV11) Silence give people time to think, to absorb what they have heard Silence gives people time to let their feelings catch up with their thinking, or their thinking catch up with their feelings Silence gives you time to gauge the reaction of your audience and how you should proceed Conclusion A lack of pausing prevents your audience from absorbing the information, gives the impression you are afraid of being contradicted, and reduces your listeners' ability to concentrate. Question: "What practical steps can you take to add silence into your next lesson?" Please add your comments on this week’s topic. We learn best when we learn in community. Do you have a question about teaching the Bible? Is it theological, technical, practical? Send me your questions or suggestions. Here’s the email: malcolm@malcolmcox.org. If you’d like a copy of my free eBook on spiritual disciplines, “How God grows His people”, sign up at my website: http://www.malcolmcox.org (http://www.malcolmcox.org/) . Please pass the link on, subscribe, leave a review. “Worship the LORD with gladness; come before him with joyful songs.” (Psalms 100:2 NIV11) God bless, Malcolm PS: You might also be interested in my book: "An elephant's swimming pool" (https://dqzrr9k4bjpzk.cloudfront.net/images/9167082/379662794.jpg) , a devotional look at the Gospel of John mccx, Malcolm Cox, Watford, Croxley Green, teaching, preaching, spiritual disciplines, public speaking, corporate worship, Sunday Sample, Corporate Worship Matters, Tuesday Teaching Tips, Quiet Time Coaching, coaching, coaching near me, coach, online coaching, savior, quiet time, devotion, God, Jesus, Pray, prayer, malcolm’s, cox, Music: Purpose by Jonny Easton; https://youtube.com/channel/UCHJVYelCXpsV8P4EVWBgj0A Creative Commons Attribution license; Free Download / Stream: http://bit.ly/al-purpose; Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/TT2PftKt1P4

Introduction "Existing literature (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C9&q=public+speaking&btnG=) on the art of public speaking is extensive: ranging from preparation (https://www.nytimes.com/guides/year-of-living-better/how-to-speak-in-public) and confidence (https://www.businessinsider.com/10-strategies-to-become-a-more-confident-public-speaker-2019-12) to body language (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2015/11/17/what-to-do-with-your-hands-when-speaking-in-public/) and tonality (https://law.wisc.edu/academics/lawskills/oral_communication/course_manual/use_voice_effectively.html) , the list of ‘golden rules’ is abundant — but mechanical. The following five rules are lesser-known approaches to public speaking and will insert dynamism, nuance, and distinction to your communication toolbox." Forbes Magasine: Ali Shahbaz (https://www.forbes.com/sites/alishahbaz/?naturalID=blogAndPostId%2Fblog%2Fpost%2F50791-5f73f9f6afc59e0007bbb7e4&source=applenews#74c01fc162cd) Let's have a look at the second of these 'lesser-known' approaches and see if it might help our preaching and teaching of God's word. Surprise, not shock "This balance is best demonstrated when speakers focus on innovating the content, not just the delivery, of their engagement." “A certain ruler asked him, “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”..."All these I have kept since I was a boy,” he said. When Jesus heard this, he said to him, “You still lack one thing. Sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.” When he heard this, he became very sad, because he was very wealthy. Jesus looked at him and said, “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God!Indeed, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” Those who heard this asked, “Who then can be saved?” ...Peter said to him, “We have left all we had to follow you!”” (Luke 18:18–28 NIV11) Jesus Allows the lad to explain himself - a connection is made Focusses on one thing - keeps it simple Interested in helping the young man, not creating a scene “Jesus looked at him and loved him. “One thing you lack,” he said. “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”” (Mark 10:21 NIV11) Trigger surprise by anticipating the likely response of your audience Avoid overwhelming the emotional capacity of your audience Conclusion Surprise is helpful, when used sparingly and for a specific and benevolent purpose Question: "What surprise can you spring on your audience in that next lesson?" Please add your comments on this week’s topic. We learn best when we learn in community. Do you have a question about teaching the Bible? Is it theological, technical, practical? Send me your questions or suggestions. Here’s the email: malcolm@malcolmcox.org. If you’d like a copy of my free eBook on spiritual disciplines, “How God grows His people”, sign up at my website: http://www.malcolmcox.org (http://www.malcolmcox.org/) . Please pass the link on, subscribe, leave a review. “Worship the LORD with gladness; come before him with joyful songs.” (Psalms 100:2 NIV11) God bless, Malcolm PS: You might also be interested in my book: "An elephant's swimming pool" (https://dqzrr9k4bjpzk.cloudfront.net/images/9167082/379662794.jpg) , a devotional look at the Gospel of John Music: Purpose by Jonny Easton; https://youtube.com/channel/UCHJVYelCXpsV8P4EVWBgj0A Creative Commons Attribution license; Free Download / Stream: http://bit.ly/al-purpose; Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/TT2PftKt1P4 mccx, Malcolm Cox, Watford, Croxley Green, teaching, preaching, spiritual disciplines, public speaking, corporate worship, Sunday Sample, Corporate Worship Matters, Tuesday Teaching Tips, Quiet Time Coaching, coaching, coaching near me, coach, online coaching, savior, quiet time, devotion, God, Jesus, Pray, prayer, malcolm’s, cox,

Como é sofrer de calor na visão de um cachorro, principalmente quando seu dono não respeita isso e quer passear mesmo assim? Entre na cabeça da Kira, uma Bulldog Francês que quase faleceu por causa disso. [Para ter uma experiência imersiva, coloque o fone de ouvido e feche os olhos] [Se preferir, pode ouvir normalmente também] Dog Voice é o podcast imersivo em 8D pra você entrar na cabeça dos cachorros e entender como eles pensam. Embarque nessa viagem até a mente dos cães. Acompanhe a gente nas redes sociais @dogvoicecast Créditos: Rafael Rodrigues (@solucoescaninas), Johnny Days - UX Sound Design e Diana Pereira Faça a nossa pesquisa e ajude a Dog Voice a melhorar ainda mais o podcast! https://forms.gle/GcQhQXnps5m2j7qJ8 Locução: Camila Quirino, Carlos Doro, Vivian Lenk e Taiz Lenk Apoio: Cachorreiros Cariocas Fontes: https://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?q=related:9aaHD1ImMBkJ:scholar.google.com/&scioq=intermação+em+cães&hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0,5#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DSDHMctTK4q4J https://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0%2C5&scioq=intermação+em+cães&q=hipertermia+em+cães+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DCpa1EmO-NoAJ https://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0%2C5&scioq=intermação+em+cães&q=hipertermia+em+cães+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3Djin4Ox2bXvQJ

Como é sofrer de calor na visão de um cachorro, principalmente quando seu dono não respeita isso e quer passear mesmo assim? Entre na cabeça da Kira, uma Bulldog Francês que quase faleceu por causa disso.[Para ter uma experiência imersiva, coloque o fone de ouvido e feche os olhos][Se preferir, pode ouvir normalmente também]Dog Voice é o podcast imersivo em 8D pra você entrar na cabeça dos cachorros e entender como eles pensam.Embarque nessa viagem até a mente dos cães. Acompanhe a gente nas redes sociais @dogvoicecastCréditos: Rafael Rodrigues (@solucoescaninas), Johnny Days - UX Sound Design e Diana PereiraFaça a nossa pesquisa e ajude a Dog Voice a melhorar ainda mais o podcast! https://forms.gle/GcQhQXnps5m2j7qJ8 Locução: Camila Quirino, Carlos Doro, Vivian Lenk e Taiz LenkApoio: Cachorreiros CariocasFontes:https://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?q=related:9aaHD1ImMBkJ:scholar.google.com/&scioq=intermação+em+cães&hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0,5#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DSDHMctTK4q4J https://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0%2C5&scioq=intermação+em+cães&q=hipertermia+em+cães+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DCpa1EmO-NoAJhttps://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0%2C5&scioq=intermação+em+cães&q=hipertermia+em+cães+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3Djin4Ox2bXvQJ

Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams broadcast RSR's quantum mechanics article with an introduction and comments. - Prerequisite 1: RSR's List of Things that are Not Physical - Prerequisite 2: Know the 2-slit experiment - Other RSR QM resources below - Version 1.0 of the article... Quantum Mechanics' Wave-Particle Duality is a Triality by Bob Enyart Three is exact. Always. To infinite precision and regardless of how often it is used, in counting and equations, as is true with all integers, three is always precisely exact. Protons are always exact as are, in our experience, all neutrons. Like those baryons, all electrons are exact and identical to particles of their same kind whether primordial or formed just now through decay. And as with electrons, all the other leptons too of the same kind appear to be identical with others of the same kind including electron neutrinos, muons, and tau neutrinos. Hundreds of thousands of experiments have confirmed the extraordinarily successful mathematics of quantum mechanics leading to the conclusion that all particles of the same kind are identical (Ford, 2005, The Quantum World, p. 100). Yet at 1,835 times the (rest) mass of an electron, the proton is relatively enormous yet always exactly the same as all others and the two particles always have the opposite, yet exactly equal, electrical charges. So fermions, including all the particles mentioned so far, along with the quarks, all appear to be identical with others of their same kinds. The creatively named up and down, strange and charm, bottom and top quarks each are identical to all others of the same kind. And all of the antiparticles, as expected, such as antilepton positrons, appear to be identical with all others of their same kinds. As an aside, positron diffraction had been demonstrated in 1980 but it took almost four decades more to perform the full two-slit experiment with antimatter demonstrating the expected wave-particle duality (Ariga, et al., 2018, arxiv.org). That interference result was first obtained with light in 1801 and then with (normal) matter beginning in 1927 with electrons, then neutrons in 1988, atoms in 1991, and molecules beginning in 1994 with the largest projectiles to date in 2013 using a synthetic carbon-based molecule of 810 atoms (Eibenberger, et al., 2013, arxiv.org). And likewise all bosons are identical with others of their same kind including the Z particle, the Higgs, and all photons as the ubiquitous and uniform force carrier of electromagnetism. (That is, all photons of the same energy levels are identical to all other similarly energized photons.) Manufacturing though, has taught mankind about unavoidable tolerances. So, how is it that all like particles, even those just now coming into existence, are apparently all absolutely identical? The exactness of repeatedly used numbers does not surprise scientists because, though materialists are known to deny this, numbers are not physical. Science itself cannot exist apart from numbers. And because numbers are not physical, scientific inquiry includes the non-physical. Numbers are a kind of information and, also often denied by materialists, information is not physical. Protons appear to be physical but certainly the statement and the concept that they are, is not physical. That statement, and any statement, as often observed, does not consist of the photons transmitting it to your eyes nor the molecules of ink on a page nor of the sound waves expressing it. Materialists may object but they disqualify themselves from being taken seriously. Rules of investigation, whether used by forensic criminologists or corporate accountants, should be valued to the extent that they help discover truth. The rules of the materialist, such as methodological naturalism, are the opposite. Materialism requires adherence to its rules of investigation especially if that means getting the most important answers completely wrong. Reviewing a Carl Sagan title, the famed Richard Lewontin (Jan. 9, 1997, New York Review of Books) admitted: We take the side of [materialist] science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs [and] in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations... Materialists’ objections are discarded because they arise from the ultimate bias, which is insistence especially if wrong. Contrary to that lack of humility, the New Testament indicates that even Christianity itself is falsifiable. If Christ is not risen, then our faith is false (1 Cor. 15:14). Yet materialists cannot match such courage, covering themselves in a layer of non-falsifiable anti-science. So because there is no discovery, or scientific law, or technological advancement that requires or affirms atheism (Enyart, 2011, rsr.org/technology), the public posturing of materialism as more scientific than theism is dishonest. RSR at NYC's main public libraryFor decades, renowned physicists, many Christians, and others have interpreted quantum mechanics as providing evidence against the materialist worldview. And even more, the observer himself appears to have a special status. Might there be then a specifically Christian insight into quantum mechanics and matter's wave-particle duality? Physics, like biology, is increasingly seen as information based. Some physicists speak of an “information wave” (ref1, ref2, ref3, ref4,  ref5, etc.) and even a primordial information wave. Quantum mechanics obeys some rules that seem almost grammatical. Subject and verb, for example, must agree in number. In organisms, it’s not the acids that encode it but the functional information that is the more fundamental substance. Human beings are body, soul, and spirit and the soul survives even if all atoms of our body are replaced over time and both soul and spirit survive even cremation, so our non-physical selves are of greater substance than our physical bodies. God exists in three persons from eternity past and created a form for the Son to indwell in which He walked in the garden, and in Nazareth, and in which He will continue to walk eternally including on the new Earth. God is Spirit through eternity past yet the Son has become flesh and taken humanity upon Himself and the Bible describes Him now as inhabiting a glorified body. The Father, the Holy Spirit, and now inhabiting a glorified body, the Son, these three are reflected in human beings as body, soul, and spirit. As God stamped the creation with His own triune image (see below), might elementary particles themselves bear that triunity? Rather than a wave-particle duality perhaps matter is a wave-particle-word triality. If so, then like with biology and even humanity, it is the non-physical information-based component behind matter that is the deeper substance, the more solid phenomenon, the harder reality. The exactness of fundamental particles is a bewildering phenomenon, so much so that asking why these are exact is a question either ignored or sufficient to drive the most brilliant men nearly insane. As Richard Feynman said in his Nobel lecture: I received a telephone call one day at the graduate college at Princeton from Professor Wheeler, in which he said, "Feynman, I know why all electrons have the same charge and the same mass" "Why?" "Because, they are all the same electron! Rather, consider that the exactness of particles is itself a quantum effect. Perhaps an electron is a mathematical expression. Likewise, perhaps a proton is a mathematical expression, or even a grammatical one, conditionally expressed as a particle or wave depending upon context and the grammatical rules of physics. Long realizing that atoms, and therefore, steel and diamonds, are mostly empty space, brings us to consider that perhaps the baryons and leptons of the atom are, in a way, less than empty space, that is, that they are non-physical. Information, being non-physical, would have no problem passing through either one or two slits, depending upon context. Regardless of how far it may extend through space a sentence requires agreement between subject and verb, just as entangled particles affect each other even over vast distances, seemingly violating the laws of classical physics but not the immaterial laws of math, information theory, and grammar. Quantum tunneling may seem impossible but what physical barrier can impede a probability, a sentence, or an equation? Of the 77 creation passages in Scripture, the two greatest parallel passages from the Old and New Testaments, Genesis 1 and John 1, both stress a literary, verbal creation. And interestingly, the great creation Psalm 19 does the same. (Note first though, that while "the" Word refers to God the Son who "became flesh and dwelt among us", this paper, not written by a pantheist, does not imply that matter is divine. We therefore use an uppercase "W" to refer to God as the Word and a lowercase "w" to refer to the wave-particle-word as information.) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... All things were made through Him, and without [the Word] nothing was made that was made. Nothing. In Genesis, to perform a creative act, He spoke, including when God "said", Let there be light. The Holy Spirit could have inspired Moses to simply write that God made light or God created light, and so on for the next seven instances. But instead, God "said." The nineteenth psalm C.S. Lewis famously described as, "one of the greatest lyrics in the world." The "higher critics", such as those of the Documentary Hypothesis, opining otherwise, describe the chapter as a disjointed concatenation of two unrelated poems (1904, Cheyne, The Book of Psalms, 2nd Ed., Vol. 1, p. 75; etc., etc.). However, they miss the structure whereby the first half describes the heavens in literary terms and the second half describes the Word of God in astronomical terms. Physical Heavens in Literary Terms: The heavens declare the glory of God And the firmament shows [Hb. tells] His handiwork Day unto day utters speech And night unto night reveals knowledge. There is no speech nor language Where their voice is not heard. Their line [Sept., Rom. 10:18, voice] has gone out through all the earth, And their words to the end of the world. Etc. The second part of Psalm 19 describes the Scriptures in terms not as evidently astronomical as the first half is literary, yet we can see it there. "The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul… The commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes…" Then, "Who can understand his errors" (from Hb. shagah) wanderings, as with the wandering planets which the ancients did not understand. Then, of those errors, "Let them not have dominion over me", using the same Hebrew word as Genesis 1 where the "lights in the firmament of the heavens… rule over the day and over the night." Other expressions may suggest the same parallel. For God's Word is as "perfect" as is the Sun's annual "circuit" (v. 6) through the stars, which can "convert the soul", which is an especially unusual Hebrew expression, translated literally as, returning the soul, with this verb reminding us of the Sun which returns "from one end of heaven… to the other" (v. 6). To summarize, nothing was created apart from the Word. Logos, there referring to God the Son (Jn. 1:14), with that Greek word also meaning idea, reason. The creation week is characterized by God "saying", and the creation Psalm describes the heavens in terms of speech and knowledge. Rather than a wave-particle duality, perhaps more complete and leading to more scientific understanding is the description of matter as a wave-particle-word triality. And perhaps as with vegetation, animals, and people, the non-physical aspect of matter is, ironically, the greater substance. Plants have a body, animals have a body and soul (Gen. 1:24; Hb. nephesh), and human beings have a body, soul, and spirit (1 Thes. 5:23; Heb. 4:12), yet the non-physical realm, which happens also to be the domain of information, is the greatest substance for all three; for plants, animals, and people. If normal metabolism happened to replace every atom in a favorite pet's body, as long as it had breath, still its identity, that is, its soul, would persist. For animals too then, and even aside from their immaterial biological information, the "physical" component is not the greater substance. For human beings, and known through general and special revelation that, as above, our spirits survive even cremation, our physical body is not remotely the greater substance of our existence. And the genetic molecule is not the deepest substance of broccoli. For just as with ink in a book, even with plants, amino acids are not the essence. And in some respects clearly a human being is "an epistle... written not with ink but by the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of flesh" (2 Cor. 3:3). Again, a plant's substance, its essence, is not it's DNA but the functional information the genetic molecule and other cellular systems carry. In the same way, if fundamental particles have a wave-particle-word triality, the information is the deeper substance, expressing matter as a wave, or a particle, depending upon the context, both mathematical and linguistic. All human beings, but especially Christian theologians and quantum physicists, can see a triune stamp on the cosmos. Electrons, physicists have discovered, are of one of the three "flavors" of leptons and one of the three groupings of quarks form protons and neutrons, with quarks existing in one of three "colors" and of multiples of one-third electrical charge. Exactly three generations of elementary particles underlie all matter. Physicist Richard Feynman in his book QED asked how many fundamental actions are there to account for nearly all phenomena in the universe regarding light and electricity to which he answered: "There are Three!" And in his Nobel prize lecture Feynman said, astoundingly, that there are three unique ways of "describing quantum mechanics". Further, unlike our arbitrary earth-based units of measurement, scientists so far have discovered "two natural units", Planck's constant, h, and the speed of light, c. A "still-unanswered question is whether a third natural unit awaits discovery", for such a triune "'all-natural' physics" would "form a basis of measurement as complete as, and much more satisfying than, the kilogram, the meter, and the second." Might there, though, be more, say, of the leptons? Overlooking the theologian, Kenneth Ford, retired director of the American Institute of Physics, wrote, "No one knows why there are three flavors of particles..." yet he concludes, "Surprisingly, physicists feel confident that the third flavor marks the end of the trail—no more lie ahead." The Christian theologian by the Scriptures knows that God exists as three persons in one Trinity. So, unsurprisingly, man has a triune nature. Christ was three days in the tomb, which Jonah’s three days foreshadowed, as did Abraham’s three days of thinking that he would sacrifice his own son on that same hill called Golgotha, the Skull, and Mt. Moriah (Gen. 22:14; 2 Chron. 3:1). Israel's three patriarchs are Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The priestly tribe of Levi is from Jacob's third child (Gen. 29:34) as Leviticus is the Bible's third book. The day the law was given the sons of Levi killed "about three thousand men' (Ex. 32:28), whereas the day the Spirit was given, "that day about three thousand souls" were saved (Acts 2:41; 2 Cor. 3:6), for the law kills but the Spirit gives life (2 Cor. 3:6-7). The Hebrew Scriptures comprise three sections, the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings (Luke 24:44), and the Bible names three archangels. The most noteworthy women are Eve, Sarah, and Mary. The magi brought gold, frankincense and myrrh. Three persons (one being the Son) started their public service at thirty years of age: Joseph (Gen. 41:46), a deliverer of his people; David (2 Sam. 5:4) seated on the messianic throne (2 Sam. 7:12-13); and "Jesus Himself began His ministry at about thirty years of age" (Luke 3:23). God could have led Esther to fast for two days, or four; and He could have kept Jonah in the whale for one day, or a week, but three days and three nights prefigures God’s plan of salvation for Christ’s time in the grave. For Jesus "rose again the third day according to the Scriptures" (1 Cor. 15:4). Thus the triune Christian God, the mystery of the Trinity, three Persons in One God, is the only true God. And even theoretically, unlike the unitarian Allah and any of the alleged pagan idols, the God of the Bible is the only one whose testimony we would be able to trust, for His triunity answers both the philosophical problem of the one and the many and it answers Socrates' challenge against theism titled Euthyphro's Dilemma. For, how could God Himself know that He is good, and not evil? Allah could not know that [John 5:31]. But with the Triune God, the Son testifies that for eternity past, the Father has never wronged the Son, and the Father of the Spirit, and the Spirit of the Son, an eternal threefold testimony for by the testimony of two or three witnesses the matter is established (Deut. 19:15; Eccl. 4:12; Mat. 18:16; John 5:31-39; 2 Cor. 13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19; Heb. 10:28). Even the one who never heard a Bible verse can notice that the Creator has imprinted our world with a triune nature. Space exists in three dimensions, height, width, and length, as does time in past, present and future. The electromagnetic force operates in positive, negative, and neutral, and in light, red, green, and blue blend into the hues of the rainbow whereas in pigment the three primary colors are red, yellow, and blue. We human beings live on this third planet from the Sun; we're made of atoms built of "just three basic particles", protons, neutrons, and electrons; and we have trichromatic color vision. Mankind's first known states of matter were solid, liquid, and gas and his first known number system used the Sumerian term "man" for 1, "woman" for 2, and the word "plurality" for 3, with math itself happening in the realm of positive, negative, and zero. His strongest shape for building is the triangle. Writers often give three examples and artists group in threes as in interior design, sculpting, and even movie directing, as compared to trilogy (1, 2, 3) there is no commonly used word for any other number of films. Photographers use the rule of thirds. Logicians use the three laws of logic as genetic scientists learned that DNA uses only three-letter words. It's not that only the number three describes reality (see rsr.org/360 and rsr.org/300). Rather, as known by architects, authors, and composers, a theme is most appreciated in the context of greater variety. If well designed, the greater the variety, the more appreciated the theme. So we humans are body, soul, and spirit (1 Thes. 5:23), made in the image of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. People live here, in heaven, and in hell. Those who love God cry, "Holy, holy, holy." Consider a hypothesis that is consistent with, well, just about everything, and that if true would help to answer many questions. Rather than a wave-particle duality, matter is a wave-particle-word triality, with "word" meaning information or, perhaps better, functional information. Quantum states are probabilistic and probability is conceptual, not physical. This may explain why, after a century of trying, currently there is no explanation for how a wave can physically collapse into a particle. No such explanation may exist. A survey of quantum physics instructors found that 30% "thought of the wave function as a physical matter wave, while nearly half preferred to view the wave function as containing information only..." A photon, like every other elementary particle, is primarily a functional information packet expressing itself, based on context and the rules of physical grammar, so to speak, as a particle or as a wave. (Experiment suggests even that a photon can exhibit aspects of both particle and wave simultaneously.) In quantum mechanics, a particle's probability is not based on a lack of information, as with a classical shell game with its one-third probability that the ball is under a particular cup. The probabilistic quantum state does not refer to a lack of knowledge about the state but to the state itself. Further, every particle, regardless of its state, is an expression of a quantum packet of information. So one consequence of the wave-particle-word triality hypothesis is that every particle is always in a quantum state. Of proton (and quark) manufacturing, so to speak, why are the tolerances exact? Why can't some protons (or their quarks), with the mass of more than 1,800 electrons, perhaps have only 99.7% or 100.1%, of the inverse charge of an electron? Why are all fundamental particles, even long after the Fall, apparently exactly identical to all others of the same kind? Elementary particles of the same kind are identical to one another because each is the expression of a mathematical and linguistic information packet, which packets are the essence of matter. A bottom quark is identical to all other bottom quarks almost in the way that the number 3 is exact and identical regardless of how many times it is expressed. Though it obeys a grammar and is fundamentally information, neither a particle nor a wave is an illusion. They are not non-physical in the sense that they only exist in one's perception. The wave does not occupy any abstract higher-dimensional Hilbert space (2016, The Quantum Handshake: Entanglement, Nonlocality and Transactions, John G. Cramer, Springer, p. 71; 2006, Cramer's transactional interpretation and causal loop problems, Synthese, Vo. 150, pp. 1-40). Instead, both the particle and the wave are actual expressions of the quantum information packet. (Should that be called a quip?) Why would a particle heading toward two slits transform itself into a wave? Why must a subject and verb agree in number? Why must the spin of a far-distant entangled particle equal zero with its entangled twin? Why grammatically is a singular subject typically paired with a plural verb when in a counterfactual subjunctive mood? These are the rules of language, human language and the language (punctuation, syntax even, grammar and composition) of physics. In both, context determines which expressions are appropriate. If we can't conceive of a particle going through two slits simultaneously, we also cannot conceive of any way that such a problem could challenge a non-physical entity. Information is not physical. It exists and flows in a non-physical dimension that is interfaced with our physical universe. Information can be generated by a man's spirit, which spirit itself is interfaced to his body. In some similarly bewildering manner, quantum information is interfaced to our physical cosmos. So, not aware of that functional information nor its role, in one camp the Copenhagen interpreters say "shut up and measure", arguing against even trying to understand. And another broad camp visualizes, in the place where the quip interfaces to the physical realm, either a multiverse or multiple non-existent physical dimensions, all because they are unwittingly trying to physicalize something that cannot be physicalized. When Newton described universal gravitation, he gave little thought to its mechanism, satisfying himself with describing what it does. Mankind has benefited ever since. Quantum physicists describe in precise detail what electrons do, for example, when they instantly jump between energy levels, but not why or how it is that they do this. (Participles, by the way, like adjectives, must agree with their substantives in case, gender, and number.) Likewise, we know the electric charge of a proton but why is it so? Maxwell's field equations addressed waves of electromagnetism a half century before Einstein spoke of individual quanta. So with the single photon's invariant zero mass we know that its velocity upon creation is light speed but why is it that speed? Following Newton's approach, if matter is a wave-particle-word triality, that gives us a clearer idea of what it is and what it is doing and even some insight into the why, even if we have no conception of the how. For example, the triality insight is supportive of the view of the particle as a mathematical equation, for, the quantum packet of functional information would include any such mathematical formulation. And this triality may help to better understand what is called the quantum conservation of weirdness. Particles can superimpose because their inherent mathematical expressions can superimpose, and the information packet containing those expressions also contain the grammatical rules to discern the proper contexts for such behavior. And a quantum state can be split because division is a valid operation on its mathematical expression. Particles can tunnel because experiment has shown that the rules of quantum syntax and grammar permit a flow of information such that these tiny physical barriers cannot prevent it. God thought E=mc2 and implemented that equality and many other beautiful mathematical equations in His creation. Likewise, design considerations and functional requirements led our inexhaustibly creative God to implement the quantum world. This provides a robust foundation for the macro world. And it also makes available these astounding microscopic capabilities to achieve otherwise impossible precision (as in navigation and smell) in biological organisms and for creative human inventors to exploit including by enabling information technology that could blur the distinction between easy and hard computational problems. Considering further this contrast between what and how, the spectacular discoveries of what the laws of science describe expose the physicist's ignorance of why and even of how they do it. The 2018 Oxford University Press text Conjuring the Universe: the origin of the laws of nature by Peter Atkins wears its author's atheism on its sleeve with the dust jacket claiming that the laws of nature leave "very little, if anything at all, for a Creator to do" and the Preface beginning, "The workings of the world have been ascribed by some to an astonishingly busybody but disembodied Creator… My gut recoils from this…" Yet right off, Chapter 1 makes it clear that the author (and by extension, all Oxford and the entire atheistic world) has no explanation for the ostensible topic of the book, the origin of laws. Two things are observed, however, about the nature of these laws, that they describe actions, and "that some are intrinsically mathematical and the others are adequately verbal" (p. 13). Thus many of nature's laws were discovered by thought experiments on such things as idealized gas, radiators, and spatial points (LaGrange), and even on things like trolleys and falling bodies. The hypothesis in this paper, that matter is fundamentally non-physical, has as a corollary, that the laws of quantum mechanics, like all laws, are themselves non-physical. The most fundamental of the laws of physics, found in the probabilistic quantum world, appear to be not only conceptual, but also declaratory. Thus an electron shall be offset by a proton; it may not decay (a prohibition); and its wave state will proceed until observed. Extrapolating from the quantum world, some of the classical laws seem to be declaratory rather than physical. For arguments sake, we can concede that methodological naturalism could possibly explain something like the inverse square law. Consider though, that classical objects shall attract each other; elements' properties shall recur in the periodic table; every action will produce a reaction. This paper's hypothesis suggests that no purely physical reason will ever be found to explain why or even how it could be that unlike the neutron, the charge of the proton and the electron are equal and opposite. Meanwhile, substantives like pronouns (current social insanity aside) are only masculine, feminine, or neutral. The corresponding electrical charge of various particles may exist because the respective quantum information packets of those particles are multi-field data records that have a sexagesimal value of plus or minus one unit in their respective electrical charge "fields", fields that is, not in the coulomb sense but in the data structure sense in information technology. So even with the inverse-square law, which has perhaps the most physicality of all the physical laws, as a particle is approached, force increases yet it does not reach infinity. Why not? Because its maximum value, is declared, not unlike when God said, "Let there be light", that is, as in computer programming, max value is set by definition. That definition is set either within the quantum information packet itself, or more likely it resides in a mathematical universal constant which is referenced by a pointer from within the packet, which provides part of the context within which that packet exists and can be expressed. Meanwhile, the non-physical is crashing down on the materialist from all sides. As though themselves glorious, numbers are not physical. Math is not physical. Information is not physical. Grammar is not physical. Logic is not physical. Reason is not physical. Ideas are not physical. Science is not physical. Concepts are not physical. Morality is not physical. Truth is not physical. Souls are not physical. Spirits are not physical. Codes are not physical. The square root of negative one is not physical (and so like everything else, by its use in the implementation of quantum mechanics, etc., therefore the √(−1) reveals the Creator). Infinity is not physical. Consciousness is not physical. Genomes are not physical. Pain is not physical. Your mind is not physical. Laws are not physical. And God is not physical. For ninety years now, various quantum physicists have even been arguing that particles themselves may not be physical! And they might be right. So the apparent exactness of all elementary particles may itself be evidence of their underlying non-physical numerical essence, with that exactness occurring by each particle's constant quantum expression of its value and worth in the eyes of the Beholder. So to the materialist, if it turns out that along with everything else, that matter itself is non-physical, well then, that's just piling on. For as Paul wrote to the Colossians, Christ "is the image of the invisible God… For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible" and He Himself is Spirit and for whatever it means, "in Him all things hold together." ### This draft is unfinished as of 4/9/20. RSR notes toward finalizing this article reside in RSR's shared Google Docs folder Quantum Mechanics including RSR's List of Quantum Mechanics Rules. Members of the RSR Research Team meet online via a Google Hangouts video conference on Monday nights at 5 p.m. Mountain Time. To join and get access to that and scores of other private team resources, see rsr.org/research-team. And please, your comments may help Bob decide whether to submit this draft to a creation journal, so don't hesitate to send them along to Bob@rsr.org. Thanks! RSR's Quantum Thoughts: - 2018: Quantum Biology Pt. 1: Doing what standard chemistry and physics can't - 2019: QB Pt. 2: Our seemingly impossible sense of smell - 2019: How Quantum Computers Do It: Finally, a Helpful Illustration - 2019: Google's Quantum Supremacy - 2019: Top Mathematicians: Ants & Bees, Mold & Amoebas - 2018: Coincidence or Determinism? Quantum theology and physics - 2015: An RSR preview show - 2020: Bob's rsr.org/wave-particle-duality-is-a-triality (this page) aka rsr.org/quantum and rsr.org/triality.  

Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams broadcast RSR's quantum mechanics article with an introduction and comments. - Prerequisite 1: RSR's List of Things that are Not Physical - Prerequisite 2: Know the 2-slit experiment - Other RSR QM resources below - Version 1.0 of the article... Quantum Mechanics' Wave-Particle Duality is a Triality by Bob Enyart Three is exact. Always. To infinite precision and regardless of how often it is used, in counting and equations, it never wears down. As is true with all integers, three is always precisely exact. Protons are always exact as are, in our experience, all neutrons. Like those baryons, all electrons are exact and identical to particles of their same kind whether primordial or formed just now through decay. And as with electrons, all the other leptons too of the same kind appear to be identical with others of the same kind including electron neutrinos, muons, and tau neutrinos. Hundreds of thousands of experiments have confirmed the extraordinarily successful mathematics of quantum mechanics leading to the conclusion that all particles of the same kind are identical (Ford, 2005, The Quantum World, p. 100). Yet at 1,835 times the (rest) mass of an electron, the proton is relatively enormous yet always exactly the same as all others and the two particles always have the opposite, yet exactly equal, electrical charges. So fermions, including all the particles mentioned so far, along with the quarks, all appear to be identical with others of their same kinds. The creatively named up and down, strange and charm, bottom and top quarks each are identical to all others of the same kind. And all of the antiparticles, as expected, such as antilepton positrons, appear to be identical with all others of their same kinds. As an aside, positron diffraction had been demonstrated in 1980 but it took almost four decades more to perform the full two-slit experiment with antimatter demonstrating the expected wave-particle duality (Ariga, et al., 2018, arxiv.org). That interference result was first obtained with light in 1801 and then with (normal) matter beginning in 1927 with electrons, then neutrons in 1988, atoms in 1991, and molecules beginning in 1994 with the largest projectiles to date in 2013 using a synthetic carbon-based molecule of 810 atoms (Eibenberger, et al., 2013, arxiv.org) and in 2019 with molecules of 2,000 atoms (Fein, et al., Nature Physics) weighing 25,000 to 40,000 AMU (atomic mass units). And likewise all bosons are identical with others of their same kind including the Z particle, the Higgs, and all photons as the ubiquitous and uniform force carrier of electromagnetism. (That is, all photons of the same energy levels are identical to all other similarly energized photons.) Manufacturing though, has taught mankind about unavoidable tolerances. So, how is it that all like particles, even those just now coming into existence, are apparently all absolutely identical? The exactness of repeatedly used numbers does not surprise scientists because, though materialists are known to deny this, numbers are not physical. Science itself cannot exist apart from numbers. And because numbers are not physical, scientific inquiry includes the non-physical. Numbers are a kind of information and, also often denied by materialists, information is not physical. Protons appear to be physical but certainly the statement and the concept that they are, is not physical. That statement, and any statement, as often observed, does not consist of the photons transmitting it to your eyes nor the molecules of ink on a page nor of the sound waves expressing it. Materialists may object but they disqualify themselves from being taken seriously. Rules of investigation, whether used by forensic criminologists or corporate accountants, should be valued to the extent that they help discover truth. The rules of the materialist, such as methodological naturalism, are the opposite. Materialism requires adherence to its rules of investigation especially if that means getting the most important answers completely wrong. Reviewing a Carl Sagan title, the famed Richard Lewontin (Jan. 9, 1997, New York Review of Books) admitted: We take the side of [materialist] science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs [and] in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations... Materialists’ objections are discarded because they arise from the ultimate bias, which is insistence especially if wrong. Contrary to that lack of humility, the New Testament indicates that even Christianity itself is falsifiable. If Christ is not risen, then our faith is false (1 Cor. 15:14). Yet materialists cannot match such courage, covering themselves in a layer of non-falsifiable anti-science. So because there is no discovery, or scientific law, or technological advancement that requires or affirms atheism (Enyart, 2011, rsr.org/technology), the public posturing of materialism as more scientific than theism is dishonest. RSR at NYC's main public libraryFor decades, renowned physicists, many Christians, and others have interpreted quantum mechanics as providing evidence against the materialist worldview. And even more, the observer himself appears to have a special status. Might there be then a specifically Christian insight into quantum mechanics and matter's wave-particle duality? Physics, like biology, is increasingly seen as information based. Some physicists speak of an “information wave” (ref1, ref2, ref3, ref4,  ref5, etc.) and even a primordial information wave. Quantum mechanics obeys some rules that seem almost grammatical. Subject and verb, for example, must agree in number. In organisms, it’s not the acids that encode it but the functional information that is the more fundamental substance. Human beings are body, soul, and spirit and the soul survives even if all atoms of our body are replaced over time and both soul and spirit survive even cremation, so our non-physical selves are of greater substance than our physical bodies. God exists in three persons from eternity past and created a form for the Son to indwell in which He walked in the garden, and in Nazareth, and in which He will continue to walk eternally including on the new Earth. God is Spirit through eternity past yet the Son has become flesh and taken humanity upon Himself and the Bible describes Him now as inhabiting a glorified body. The Father, the Holy Spirit, and now inhabiting a glorified body, the Son, these three are reflected in human beings as body, soul, and spirit. As God stamped the creation with His own triune image (see below), might elementary particles themselves bear that triunity? Rather than a wave-particle duality perhaps matter is a wave-particle-word triality. If so, then like with biology and even humanity, it is the non-physical information-based component behind matter that is the deeper substance, the more solid phenomenon, the harder reality. The exactness of fundamental particles is a bewildering phenomenon, so much so that asking why these are exact is a question either ignored or sufficient to drive the most brilliant men nearly insane. As Richard Feynman said in his Nobel lecture: I received a telephone call one day at the graduate college at Princeton from Professor Wheeler, in which he said, "Feynman, I know why all electrons have the same charge and the same mass" "Why?" "Because, they are all the same electron!" That's similar to saying that the reason all threes are exactly the same is because they're all the same three! Consider though that the exactness of particles is itself a quantum effect. Perhaps an electron is a mathematical expression. Likewise, perhaps a proton is a mathematical expression, or even a grammatical one, conditionally expressed as a particle or wave depending upon context and the grammatical rules of physics. Long realizing that atoms, and therefore, steel and diamonds, are mostly empty space, brings us to consider that perhaps the baryons and leptons of the atom are, in a way, less than empty space, that is, that they are non-physical. Information, being non-physical, would have no problem passing through either one or two slits, depending upon context. Regardless of how far it may extend through space a sentence requires agreement between subject and verb, just as entangled particles affect each other even over vast distances, seemingly violating the laws of classical physics but not the immaterial laws of math, information theory, and grammar. Quantum tunneling may seem impossible but what physical barrier can impede a probability, a sentence, or an equation? Of the 77 creation passages in Scripture, the two greatest parallel passages from the Old and New Testaments, Genesis 1 and John 1, both stress a literary, verbal creation. And interestingly, the great creation Psalm 19 does the same. (Note first though, that while "the" Word refers to God the Son who "became flesh and dwelt among us", this paper, not written by a pantheist, does not imply that matter is divine. We therefore use an uppercase "W" to refer to God as the Word and a lowercase "w" to refer to the wave-particle-word as information.) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... All things were made through Him, and without [the Word] nothing was made that was made. Nothing. In Genesis, to perform a creative act, He spoke, including when God "said", Let there be light. The Holy Spirit could have inspired Moses to simply write that God made light or God created light, and so on for the next seven instances. But instead, God "said." The nineteenth psalm C.S. Lewis famously described as, "one of the greatest lyrics in the world." The "higher critics", such as those of the Documentary Hypothesis, opining otherwise, describe the chapter as a disjointed concatenation of two unrelated poems (1904, Cheyne, The Book of Psalms, 2nd Ed., Vol. 1, p. 75; etc., etc.). However, they miss the structure whereby the first half describes the physical heavens in literary terms and the second half describes the written or literary Word of God in astronomical terms. Physical Heavens in Literary Terms: The heavens declare the glory of God And the firmament shows [Hb. tells] His handiwork Day unto day utters speech And night unto night reveals knowledge. There is no speech nor language Where their voice is not heard. Their line [Sept., Rom. 10:18, voice] has gone out through all the earth, And their words to the end of the world. Etc. The second part of Psalm 19 describes the Scriptures in terms not as evidently astronomical as the first half is literary, yet we can see it there. "The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul… The commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes…" Then, "Who can understand his errors" (from Hb. shagah) wanderings, as with the wandering planets which the ancients did not understand. Then, of those errors, "Let them not have dominion over me", using the same Hebrew word as Genesis 1 where the "lights in the firmament of the heavens… rule over the day and over the night." Other expressions may suggest the same parallel. For God's Word is as "perfect" as is the Sun's annual "circuit" (v. 6) through the stars, which can "convert the soul", which is an especially unusual Hebrew expression, translated literally as, returning the soul, with this verb reminding us of the Sun which returns "from one end of heaven… to the other" (v. 6). So nothing was created apart from the Word. Logos, there referring to God the Son (Jn. 1:14), with that Greek word also meaning idea, reason. The creation week is characterized by God "saying", and the creation Psalm describes the heavens in terms of speech and knowledge. As with all creation, God is the "Author of life" (Acts 3:15). Likewise with redemption He is the "Author" of salvation and of faith (Heb. 2:10; 5:9; 12:2). Even then regarding the ongoing operation of the universe we see the same literary perspective with God, "upholding all things by the word of His power" (Heb. 1:3). Rather than a wave-particle duality, perhaps more complete and leading to more scientific understanding is the description of matter as a wave-particle-word triality. And perhaps as with vegetation, animals, and people, the non-physical aspect of matter is, ironically, the greater substance. Plants have a body, animals have a body and soul (Gen. 1:24; Hb. nephesh), and human beings have a body, soul, and spirit (1 Thes. 5:23; Heb. 4:12), yet the non-physical realm, which happens also to be the domain of information, is the greatest substance for all three; for plants, animals, and people. If normal metabolism happened to replace every atom in a favorite pet's body, as long as it had breath, still its identity, that is, its soul, would persist. For animals too then, and even aside from their immaterial biological information, the "physical" component is not the greater substance. For human beings, and known through general and special revelation that, as above, our spirits survive even cremation, our physical body is not remotely the greater substance of our existence. And the genetic molecule is not the deepest substance of broccoli. For just as with ink in a book, even with plants, amino acids are not the essence. And in some respects clearly a human being is "an epistle... written not with ink but by the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of flesh" (2 Cor. 3:3). Again, a plant's substance, its essence, is not it's DNA but the functional information the genetic molecule and other cellular systems carry. In the same way, if fundamental particles have a wave-particle-word triality, the information is the deeper substance, expressing matter as a wave, or a particle, depending upon the context, both mathematical and linguistic. All human beings, but especially Christian theologians and quantum physicists, can see a triune stamp on the cosmos. Electrons, physicists have discovered, are of one of the three "flavors" of leptons and one of the three groupings of quarks form protons and neutrons, with quarks existing in one of three "colors" and of multiples of one-third electrical charge. Exactly three generations of elementary particles underlie all matter. Physicist Richard Feynman in his book QED asked how many fundamental actions are there to account for nearly all phenomena in the universe regarding light and electricity to which he answered: "There are Three!" And in his Nobel prize lecture Feynman said, astoundingly, that there are three unique ways of "describing quantum mechanics". Further, unlike our arbitrary earth-based units of measurement, scientists so far have discovered "two natural units", Planck's constant, h, and the speed of light, c. A "still-unanswered question is whether a third natural unit awaits discovery", for such a triune "'all-natural' physics" would "form a basis of measurement as complete as, and much more satisfying than, the kilogram, the meter, and the second." Might there, though, be more, say, of the leptons? Overlooking the theologian, Kenneth Ford, retired director of the American Institute of Physics, wrote, "No one knows why there are three flavors of particles..." yet he concludes, "Surprisingly, physicists feel confident that the third flavor marks the end of the trail—no more lie ahead." The Christian theologian by the Scriptures knows that God exists as three persons in one Trinity. So, unsurprisingly, man has a triune nature. Christ was three days in the tomb, which Jonah’s three days foreshadowed, as did Abraham’s three days of thinking that he would sacrifice his own son on that same hill called Golgotha, the Skull, and Mt. Moriah (Gen. 22:14; 2 Chron. 3:1). Israel's three patriarchs are Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The priestly tribe of Levi is from Jacob's third child (Gen. 29:34) as Leviticus is the Bible's third book. The day the law was given the sons of Levi killed "about three thousand men' (Ex. 32:28), whereas the day the Spirit was given, "that day about three thousand souls" were saved (Acts 2:41; 2 Cor. 3:6), for the law kills but the Spirit gives life (2 Cor. 3:6-7). The Hebrew Scriptures comprise three sections, the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings (Luke 24:44), and the Bible names three archangels. The most noteworthy women are Eve, Sarah, and Mary. The magi brought gold, frankincense and myrrh. Three persons (one being the Son) started their public service at thirty years of age: Joseph (Gen. 41:46), a deliverer of his people; David (2 Sam. 5:4) seated on the messianic throne (2 Sam. 7:12-13); and "Jesus Himself began His ministry at about thirty years of age" (Luke 3:23). God could have led Esther to fast for two days, or four; and He could have kept Jonah in the whale for one day, or a week, but three days and three nights prefigures God’s plan of salvation for Christ’s time in the grave. For Jesus "rose again the third day according to the Scriptures" (1 Cor. 15:4). Thus the triune Christian God, the mystery of the Trinity, three Persons in One God, is the only true God. And even theoretically, unlike the unitarian Allah and any of the alleged pagan idols, the God of the Bible is the only one whose testimony we would be able to trust, for His triunity answers both the philosophical problem of the one and the many and it answers Socrates' challenge against theism titled Euthyphro's Dilemma. For, how could God Himself know that He is good, and not evil? Allah could not know that [John 5:31]. But with the Triune God, the Son testifies that for eternity past, the Father has never wronged the Son, and the Father of the Spirit, and the Spirit of the Son, an eternal threefold testimony for by the testimony of two or three witnesses the matter is established (Deut. 19:15; Eccl. 4:12; Mat. 18:16; John 5:31-39; 2 Cor. 13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19; Heb. 10:28). Even the one who never heard a Bible verse can notice that the Creator has imprinted our world with a triune nature. Space exists in three dimensions, height, width, and length, as does time in past, present and future. The electromagnetic force operates in positive, negative, and neutral, and in light, red, green, and blue blend into the hues of the rainbow whereas in pigment the three primary colors are red, yellow, and blue. We human beings live on this third planet from the Sun; we're made of atoms built of "just three basic particles", protons, neutrons, and electrons; and we have trichromatic color vision. Mankind's first known states of matter were solid, liquid, and gas and his first known number system used the Sumerian term "man" for 1, "woman" for 2, and the word "plurality" for 3, with math itself happening in the realm of positive, negative, and zero. His strongest shape for building is the triangle. Writers often give three examples and artists group in threes as in interior design, sculpting, and even movie directing, as compared to trilogy (1, 2, 3) there is no commonly used word for any other number of films. Photographers use the rule of thirds. Logicians use the three laws of logic as genetic scientists learned that DNA uses only three-letter words. It's not that only the number three describes reality (see rsr.org/360 and rsr.org/300). Rather, as known by architects, authors, and composers, a theme is most appreciated in the context of greater variety. If well designed, the greater the variety, the more appreciated the theme. So we humans are body, soul, and spirit (1 Thes. 5:23), made in the image of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. People live here, in heaven, and in hell. Those who love God cry, "Holy, holy, holy." Consider a hypothesis that is consistent with, well, just about everything, and that if true would help to answer many questions. Rather than a wave-particle duality, matter is a wave-particle-word triality, with "word" meaning information or, perhaps better, functional information. Quantum states are probabilistic and probability is conceptual, not physical. This may explain why, after a century of trying, currently there is no explanation for how a wave can physically collapse into a particle. No such explanation may exist. A survey of quantum physics instructors found that 30% "thought of the wave function as a physical matter wave, while nearly half preferred to view the wave function as containing information only..." A photon, like every other elementary particle, is primarily a functional information packet expressing itself, based on context and the rules of physical grammar, so to speak, as a particle or as a wave. (Experiment suggests even that a photon can exhibit aspects of both particle and wave simultaneously.) In quantum mechanics, a particle's probability is not based on a lack of information, as with a classical shell game with its one-third probability that the ball is under a particular cup. The probabilistic quantum state does not refer to a lack of knowledge about the state but to the state itself. Further, every particle, regardless of its state, is an expression of a quantum packet of information. So one consequence of the wave-particle-word triality hypothesis is that every particle is always in a quantum state. Of proton (and quark) manufacturing, so to speak, why are the tolerances exact? Why can't some protons (or their quarks), with the mass of more than 1,800 electrons, perhaps have only 99.7% or 100.1%, of the inverse charge of an electron? Why are all fundamental particles, even long after the Fall, apparently exactly identical to all others of the same kind? Elementary particles of the same kind are identical to one another because each is the expression of a mathematical and linguistic information packet, which packets are the essence of matter. A bottom quark is identical to all other bottom quarks in the way that the number 3 is exact and identical regardless of how many times it is expressed. Though it obeys a grammar and is fundamentally information, neither a particle nor a wave is an illusion. They are not non-physical in the sense that they only exist in one's perception. The wave does not occupy any abstract higher-dimensional Hilbert space (2016, The Quantum Handshake: Entanglement, Nonlocality and Transactions, John G. Cramer, Springer, p. 71; 2006, Cramer's transactional interpretation and causal loop problems, Synthese, Vo. 150, pp. 1-40). Instead, both the particle and the wave are actual expressions of the quantum information packet. (Should that be called a quip?) Why would a particle heading toward two slits transform itself into a wave? Why must a subject and verb agree in number? Why must the spin of a far-distant entangled particle equal zero with its entangled twin? Why grammatically is a singular subject typically paired with a plural verb when in a counterfactual subjunctive mood? These are the rules of language, human language and the language (punctuation, syntax even, grammar and composition) of physics. In both, context determines which expressions are appropriate. If we can't conceive of a particle going through two slits simultaneously, we also cannot conceive of any way that such a problem could challenge a non-physical entity. Information is not physical. It exists and flows in a non-physical dimension that is interfaced with our physical universe. Information can be generated by a man's spirit, which spirit itself is interfaced to his body. In some similarly bewildering manner, quantum information is interfaced to our physical cosmos. So, not aware of that functional information nor its role, in one camp the Copenhagen interpreters say "shut up and measure", arguing against even trying to understand. And another broad camp visualizes, in the place where the quip interfaces to the physical realm, either a multiverse or multiple non-existent physical dimensions, all because they are unwittingly trying to physicalize something that cannot be physicalized. When Newton described universal gravitation, he gave little thought to its mechanism, satisfying himself with describing what it does. Mankind has benefited ever since. Quantum physicists describe in precise detail what electrons do, for example, when they instantly jump between energy levels, but not why or how it is that they do this. (Participles, by the way, like adjectives, must agree with their substantives in case, gender, and number.) Likewise, we know the electric charge of a proton but why is it so? Maxwell's field equations addressed waves of electromagnetism a half century before Einstein spoke of individual quanta. So with the single photon's invariant zero mass we know that its velocity upon creation is light speed but why is it that speed? Following Newton's approach, if matter is a wave-particle-word triality, that gives us a clearer idea of what it is and what it is doing and even some insight into the why, even if we have no conception of the how. For example, the triality insight is supportive of the view of the particle as a mathematical equation, for, the quantum packet of functional information would include any such mathematical formulation. And this triality may help to better understand what is called the quantum conservation of weirdness. Particles can superimpose because their inherent mathematical expressions can superimpose, and the information packet containing those expressions also contain the grammatical rules to discern the proper contexts for such behavior. And a quantum state can be split because division is a valid operation on its mathematical expression. Particles can tunnel because experiment has shown that the rules of quantum syntax and grammar permit a flow of information such that these tiny physical barriers cannot prevent it. God thought E=mc2 and implemented that equality and many other beautiful mathematical equations in His creation. Likewise, design considerations and functional requirements led our inexhaustibly creative God to implement the quantum world. This provides a robust foundation for the macro world. And it also makes available these astounding microscopic capabilities to achieve otherwise impossible precision (as in navigation and smell) in biological organisms and for creative human inventors to exploit including by enabling information technology that could blur the distinction between easy and hard computational problems. Considering further this contrast between what and how, the spectacular discoveries of what the laws of science describe expose the physicist's ignorance of why and even of how they do it. The 2018 Oxford University Press text Conjuring the Universe: the origin of the laws of nature by Peter Atkins wears its author's atheism on its sleeve with the dust jacket claiming that the laws of nature leave "very little, if anything at all, for a Creator to do" and the Preface beginning, "The workings of the world have been ascribed by some to an astonishingly busybody but disembodied Creator… My gut recoils from this…" Yet right off, Chapter 1 makes it clear that the author (and by extension, all Oxford and the entire atheistic world) has no explanation for the ostensible topic of the book, the origin of laws. Two things are observed, however, about the nature of these laws, that they describe actions, and "that some are intrinsically mathematical and the others are adequately verbal" (p. 13). Thus many of nature's laws were discovered by thought experiments on such things as idealized gas, radiators, and spatial points (LaGrange), and even on things like trolleys and falling bodies. The hypothesis in this paper, that matter is fundamentally non-physical, has as a corollary, that the laws of quantum mechanics, like all laws, are themselves non-physical. The most fundamental of the laws of physics, found in the probabilistic quantum world, appear to be not only conceptual, but also declaratory. Thus an electron shall be offset by a proton; it may not decay (a prohibition); and its wave state will proceed until observed. Extrapolating from the quantum world, some of the classical laws seem to be declaratory rather than physical. For arguments sake, we can concede that methodological naturalism could possibly explain something like the inverse square law. Consider though, that classical objects shall attract each other; elements' properties shall recur in the periodic table; every action will produce a reaction. This paper's hypothesis suggests that no purely physical reason will ever be found to explain why or even how it could be that unlike the neutron, the charge of the proton and the electron are equal and opposite. Meanwhile, substantives like pronouns (current social insanity aside) are only masculine, feminine, or neutral. The corresponding electrical charge of various particles may exist because the respective quantum information packets of those particles are multi-field data records that have a sexagesimal value of plus or minus one unit in their respective electrical charge "fields", fields that is, not in the coulomb sense but in the data structure sense in information technology. So even with the inverse-square law, which has perhaps the most physicality of all the physical laws, as a particle is approached, force increases yet it does not reach infinity. Why not? Because its maximum value, is declared, not unlike when God said, "Let there be light", that is, as in computer programming, max value is set by definition. That definition is set either within the quantum information packet itself, or more likely it resides in a mathematical universal constant which is referenced by a pointer from within the packet, which provides part of the context within which that packet exists and can be expressed. Meanwhile, the non-physical is crashing down on the materialist from all sides. As though themselves glorious, numbers are not physical. Math is not physical. Information is not physical. Grammar is not physical. Logic is not physical. Reason is not physical. Ideas are not physical. Science is not physical. Concepts are not physical. Morality is not physical. Truth is not physical. Souls are not physical. Spirits are not physical. Codes are not physical. The square root of negative one is not physical (and so like everything else, by its use in the implementation of quantum mechanics, etc., therefore the √(−1) reveals the Creator). Infinity is not physical. Consciousness is not physical. Genomes are not physical. Pain is not physical. Your mind is not physical. Laws are not physical. And God is not physical. For ninety years now, various quantum physicists have even been arguing that particles themselves may not be physical! And they might be right. So the apparent exactness of all elementary particles may itself be evidence of their underlying non-physical numerical essence, with that exactness occurring by each particle's constant quantum expression of its value and worth in the eyes of the Beholder. So to the materialist, if it turns out that along with everything else, that matter itself is non-physical, well then, that's just piling on. For as Paul wrote to the Colossians, Christ "is the image of the invisible God… For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible" and He Himself is Spirit and for whatever it means, "in Him all things hold together." ### This draft is unfinished as of 4/9/20. RSR notes toward finalizing this article reside in RSR's shared Google Docs folder Quantum Mechanics including RSR's List of Quantum Mechanics Rules. Members of the RSR Research Team meet online via a Google Hangouts video conference on Monday nights at 5 p.m. Mountain Time. To join and get access to that and scores of other private team resources, see rsr.org/research-team. And please, your comments may help Bob decide whether to submit this draft to a creation journal, so don't hesitate to send them along to Bob@rsr.org. Thanks! RSR's Quantum Thoughts: - 2018: Quantum Biology: Doing what standard chemistry and physics can't - 2019: QB Pt. 2: Our seemingly impossible sense of smell - 2019: How Quantum Computers Do It: Finally, a Helpful Illustration - 2019: Google's Quantum Supremacy - 2019: Top Mathematicians: Ants & Bees, Mold & Amoebas - 2018: Coincidence or Determinism? Quantum theology and physics - 2015: An RSR preview show - 2020: Our rsr.org/wave-particle-duality-is-a-triality (this page) aka rsr.org/quantum and rsr.org/triality.  

It’s been a whole year of Sci Guys, so we thought we’d do our most requested topic. Get ready to learn everything you need to know about Climate Change!  You can WATCH the podcast over on our YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/SciGuys If you would like to support the podcast, please donate to our Patreon: http://patreon.com/SciGuys If you'd like to see more of us, follow our socials! Facebook http://facebook.com/SciGuysPod Twitter http://twitter.com/SciGuysPod Instagram http://instagram.com/SciGuysPod References and Further Reading https://youtu.be/RLqXkYrdmjY https://www.snopes.com/collections/climate-change-denial-debunked/ http://opr.ca.gov/facts/common-denier-arguments.html https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/climate-skeptic.htm https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2019&q=can+we+stop+climate+change&btnG= https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wcc.619 https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=9uG5DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT7&dq=climate+change&ots=aBOkXWn-Xq&sig=Fv3H3hbf3pMW4I1Jn3JKjDN8UUA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=climate%20change&f=false https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-019-0222-5 https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=KwKGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=climate+change&ots=17NhLbNRM5&sig=0-PTMtlh483VSHMDk6RymNn29Tk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=climate%20change&f=false http://www.keneamazon.net/Documents/Publications/Virtual-Library/Mitigacion/28.pdf http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/G20-REPORT.pdf https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/GLEP_a_00105 https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=RsYr_iQUs6QC&oi=fnd&pg=PA399&dq=climate+denial&ots=r6SF28j96F&sig=czB6fLWBenvYrmbExXNDZcSh_lE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=climate%20denial&f=false https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/10305 https://www.wtamu.edu/library/help/scholarly.shtml https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29851610 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31467005 https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C9BKJA_enGB883GB883&hl=en-GB&sxsrf=ALeKk027tHQKxNP9qLYo0U4fDPZUT2UE-g%3A1585183939363&ei=w_x7XqLqFYnCgQaVqZfQAQ&q=free+online+academic+journals&oq=where+to+find+scholarly+articles&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.1.2.0i71l5.0.0..227298...0.1..0.0.0.......0.1S0QV0kHSlA https://shib.wtamu.edu/idp/profile/SAML2/POST/SSOl Follow the Sci Guys @notcorry / @jampkin / @lukecutforth sciguys.co.uk

Folge 10 - Medikamentenforschung Wo könnten pharmakologische Entdeckungen lauern? Und was hat Karims Australien-Phobie damit zu tun? In dieser Folge geht es tief runter auf den Meeresgrund und in die Karibik. Hintergrund: https://scholar.google.de/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=safavi+hemami&btnG= https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=cone+snails https://www.pnas.org/content/116/51/25745 Kontakt: breakingvet@gmail.com Musik: –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Track: Sprinkles — Johny Grimes [Audio Library Release] Music provided by Audio Library Plus Watch: https://youtu.be/BHUAx6hpqaI Free Download / Stream: https://alplus.io/Sprinkles ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

https://nypost.com/2019/08/14/ayoola-ajayi-accused-killer-of-student-mackenzie-lueck-faces-child-porn-charges/https://www.yahoo.com/news/epstein-may-gamed-system-beyond-195848039.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_testing_at_Bikini_Atollhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C25&q=Micronesia%3A+America%27s+%27strategic%27+trust%22.+The+Bulletin+of+the+Atomic+Scientists&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DEmZH-c3egHAJhttps://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Settlement-in-Rebecca-Zahau-Civil-Case-San-Diego-Spreckles-Mansion-505423701.htmlEMAIL: thebfdpodcast@gmail.comSOCIAL MEDIA: @thebfdpodcast

Kontra K bleibt auf der Überholspur: Nach "Erde & Knochen" veröffentlicht der Berliner jetzt sein inzwischen achtes Album "Sie wollten Wasser doch kriegen Benzin". Niko, Kevin und Ömer haben sich zusammengesetzt und sich das Album angehört. Track by Track besprechen sie die 20 Anspielstationen der Platte und diskutieren über den Stand von Kontra K in der Szene,  seine Message an seine Hörerschaft und die hochkarätigen Featuregäste auf dem Album.

Jason Myerson (Adjunct Faculty), Ellen Wetherbee (Director of Clinical Education at Quinnipiac University), and Mario Paredes (A recent student of Quinnipiac's academic/clinical readiness program) come onto HETPodcast to talk about Quinnipiac's DPT Academic & Clinical Readiness Program to better enhance student readiness prior to entering their clinical rotations and entering the work force as a contributing solution to addressing some of the issues with DPT education.   Biography Jason Myerson Jason is a 2005 graduate of Quinnipiac University with his master's in Physical Therapy. He went on to complete Manual Therapy Residency and Fellowship training through the Ola Grimsby Institute in 2011 and 2012. Through the OGI he achieved a Doctorate in Manual Therapy in 2012 and became a Fellow of the American Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapists in 2013. Jason became a board certified Orthopedic Clinical Specialist in 2013 and completed a certification in Dry Needling (CMTPT) through Myopain Seminars in December of 2014. Jason gained his DPT from Arcadia University in 2015. Jason is an adjunct faculty at Quinnipiac University. He serves as faculty with Institute of Advanced Musculoskeletal Treatments (IAMT) and Select Physical Therapy instructing weekend continued education courses and well as manual therapy (COMT) and Dry Needling certification courses. Jason Myerson is a physical therapist for Select Physical Therapy in Shelton, CT. Ellen Wetherbee-McDevitt Ellen worked full-time in outpatient orthopedic settings for over 10 years and supervised several students during their clinical experiences. In 1996, she became an Academic Coordinator of Clinical Education at the University of Hartford. In addition to being an ACCE, she taught in the lab components for the musculoskeletal content as well as a course on education in the clinical setting. She received a Masters of Education from the University of Hartford in 2001 and a Transitional Doctor of Physical Therapy in 2006. In 2013, she became Director of Clinical Education at Quinnipiac University. Throughout her career, she has published articles and presented at national conferences on issues related to various aspects related to the quality and climate of clinical education. Mario Paredes Mario is a 2018 graduate from Quinnipiac University where he earned his Doctorate of Physical Therapy. While pursuing his degree in physical therapy, Mario has immersed himself in continuing education courses and mentorships that focus on manual therapy, movement mechanics, strength and conditioning, common injuries, and preventative rehabilitation. Mario looks forward to continuing his education as a current resident through Sacred Heart University's residency program.   List of Resources Phillips, A. C., Mackintosh, S. F., Bell, A., & Johnston, K. N. (2017). Developing physiotherapy student safety skills in readiness for clinical placement using standardised patients compared with peer-role play: A pilot non-randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 17(1). doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0973-5. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-017-0973-5  Smith, S. N., & Crocker, A. F. (2017). Experiential learning in physical therapy education. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Volume 8, 427-433. doi:10.2147/amep.s140373 https://www.dovepress.com/experiential-learning-in-physical-therapy-education-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-AMEP Dalwood, N., Maloney, S. R., Cox, N., & Morgan, P. E. (2018). Preparing Physiotherapy Students for Clinical Placement: Student Perceptions of Low-Cost Peer Simulation. A Mixed-Methods Study. Simulation in Healthcare, 13(3), 181-187. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000276 (FULL VERSION NOT AVAILABLE VIA LINK, EMAIL brandonpoen@gmail.com for full article) Link to Ellen's Involved Research with Education: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C47&q=ellen+wetherbee&btnG=  Diane U Jette, Alicia Bertoni, Renee Coots, Heidi Johnson, Catherine McLaughlin, Cody Weisbach; Clinical Instructors' Perceptions of Behaviors That Comprise Entry-Level Clinical Performance in Physical Therapist Students: A Qualitative Study, Physical Therapy, Volume 87, Issue 7, 1 July 2007, Pages 833 843, https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070003 https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/87/7/833/2742162    Ellen's Email Address: Ellen.Wetherbee-McDevitt@quinnipiac.edu   Jason's Email Address: jbmyerson@gmail.com   Jason's Instagram Page: https://www.instagram.com/thecraftmanualtherapist/  Mario's Email Address: mario.paredes@quinnipiac.edu   Mario's Instagram Page: https://www.instagram.com/maparedes312/  The PT Hustle Website: https://www.thepthustle.com/  Schedule an Appointment with Kyle Rice: www.passtheptboards.com    HET LITE Tool: www.pteducator.com/het    Anywhere Healthcare: https://anywhere.healthcare/ (code: HET)

This week on Pulse, breakdancing is more than just dance for a group of young people in Uganda. We meet African-German rapper, BTNG. And, two men in Nairobi are breaking down stereotypes for people with albinism. All that and more on this jam-packed edition of Pulse with host Jessie Wingard.

This week on Pulse, breakdancing is more than just dance for a group of young people in Uganda. We meet African-German rapper, BTNG. And, two men in Nairobi are breaking down stereotypes for people with albinism. All that and more on this jam-packed edition of Pulse with host Jessie Wingard.

Today we're going to teach you a little something about voltage! We're also going to delve into all the ways we've been misled (by yours truly BUT ALSO BY A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE) about the humble potato battery. Other topics of note: weddings, the curse of knowledge, theory of mind, reduction potentials again, and battery efficiency. Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage battery efficiencies: https://www.pv-magazine.com/magazine-archive/advancing-li-ion_10006681/#axzz4QbD0S6qc research into catalysis of hydrogen reduction (aka hydrogen evolution): actually, why don't you just google it? https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C44&q=hydrogen+evolution+reaction+catalysts&btnG=&oq=hydrog there, now you've read some paper titles and you know as much as we do! (actually what the paper titles probably don't tell you is that platinum is REALLY a good catalyst but it's very expensive so that's why there's so much research into finding an alternative. Now you know!) comparison of the ability of metals to catalyze a hydrogen reduction reaction: http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/152/3/J23.short other questions? let us know at batterychattery@gmail.com   

Dedicated To Elevating Your Health & Family Wellness Lifestyle.   Debbie’s journey started years ago when her daughter was injured on the basketball court. A licensed massage therapist began rubbing oils on her daughter, telling her about the healing properties of each oil. What should have taken weeks to recover, only took days. Debbie was so impressed at the speed of healing that she began her journey with extensive research and education - so that she too - could help others. After becoming certified to do body applications and Vita-Flex technique, known as “Raindrop” through CARE, Debbie continued her education by getting her Aromatherapist Certification through Aroma Hut. Debbie is also licensed under the National Therapies Certification Board.   My Websites/Social Media: http://hoilistictouch.blogspot.com/ hoilistictouch.com www.facebook/excitingoils  www.facebook/hoilistictouch https://naha.org/find-an-aromatherapist?search:dir_state=Texas   https://www.raindroptraining.com/crplist.php?country=1 (I’m listed under Burleson, TX)   Resources I love:   www.oil-testimonials.com   www.organicfacts.net   http://airase.com/free-webinar-intro-to-essential-oil-basics/   https://naha.org/   http://www.huffingtonpost.com/julie-chen-md/aromatherapy_b_3698319.html Scents to heal   www.googlescholar.com is an excellent way to search essential oils. Example: About 2,040,000 results (0.06 sec) https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=essential+oils&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C44&as_sdtp=   You Tube   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFm3yA1nslE Crash Course Biology is  funny and  educational. We used this a lot at Aroma Hut   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15GZ0db1Nr8 Gary Young’s video – Don’t know if you can mention this – but it is a good video     Books   Releasing Emotional Patterns with Essential Oils, Carolyn Mein, DC   Therapeutic Blending, Rebecca Totilo   Organic Beauty, Rebecca Totilo   Advanced Aromatherapy, Kurt Schnaubelt   

Episode Audio Dave and Tamler talk about the value and purposes of thought experiments in philosophy and science. Does the trolley problem tell us more about moral psychology than how people make judgments introlley problems? Can an imagined scenario about two balls refute an almost two thousand year old theory of falling objects?  When young virgin Dave learned all the physical facts about sex, did he learnanything new when it finally happened?  All this and more in Part One of our two part episode on this topic.LinksThe experience machine [wikipedia.org]Mary the color scientist [wikipedia.org]Zombies [wikipedia.org]Qualia [wikipedia.org]The Violinist from "A defense of Abortion" [wikipedia.org]The Ship of Theseus [wikipedia.org]Newcomb's Paradox [wikipedia.org]Ring of Gyges [wikipedia.org]Peter Singer's thought experiment [wikipedia.org]Veil of Ignorance [wikipedia.org]Galileo's Balls [philosophical-investigations.org]Tamler's Zombie Paper

This week on the Crizzlecast, I'll be talking to two journalists who have covered the music scene, but are also accomplished musicians in their own right. First up is Tony Green, a veteran music writer whose work I mostly got acquainted with in the pages of Vibe back in the day. We talk about his history as a music journalist, as well as his brief stint as a radio DJ and his current gig as member of the funk band JeZ Grew. We also ask the Sunshine State-based Green what the hell is up with Florida -- like, seriously. If you wanna know too, take a listen.