Podcasts about jp morgan

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Carly Stagge left corporate finance at JP Morgan and did $1 million in assignment fees her first full year in Denver. She explains why her company double closes every deal now, and how transactional funding moved their average fee from $17,500 to $25,500 in a single month. She also covers what a double close does that an assignment cannot, including the ability to renegotiate price with the seller, and why assignment fee laws in states like Pennsylvania and Ohio are pushing wholesalers toward it. KEY TALKING POINTS: 0:00 - Intro 3:11 - Carly's Million-Dollar First Year 5:23 - Why Wholesaling Became Addictive 6:59 - Finding Deals in Colorado 8:45 - Marketing & Direct-to-Seller Methods 9:53 - Double Closing as Free Marketing 11:50 - Bigger Spreads Through Double Closing 15:34 - Building Your Own Capital 17:01 - Keys to First-Year Success 19:19 - Overcoming Fear of Spending Money 20:35 - Networking & Learning From Mentors 23:34 - Starting the Transactional Funding Fund 26:16 - Career Path: Finance to New Western 28:03 - Goals for the Funding Company 30:47 - Most Rewarding Deal Story 32:49 - Where to Find Carly & Outro LINKS: Instagram: Flip Fund Capital https://www.instagram.com/flipfund_capital/ Website: Flip Fund Capital https://www.flipfundcapital.com/ Instagram: David Lecko https://www.instagram.com/dlecko Website: DealMachine https://www.dealmachine.com/pod Instagram: Ryan Haywood https://www.instagram.com/heritage_home_investments Website: Heritage Home Investments https://www.heritagehomeinvestments.com/

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

It was a mixed August for the market. JPMorgan fixed-income guru Bob Michele breaks down some of what's driving the moves across assets, including how the bond market could be playing a role in the wavering of some AI stocks. Meantime, Brookings' Michael O'Hanlon sorts through the weekend geopolitical headlines and what it means for investors. Our Kate Rooney reports on OpenAI's rapidly growing ads business before Evercore's Mark Mahaney discusses divide between Meta and Alphabet. Our Mackenzie Sigalos reports on Tim Cook's final memo and the challenges ahead for incoming Apple CEO John Ternus. Fairlead's Katie Stockton reads the technical tea leaves on some key macro charts. UBS analyst Michael Yee on the wild August for biotech. Piper Sandler's James Fish looks ahead to Dell's results. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

"Your entire life will change when you realize energy is the most attractive human trait. Not looks, wealth, or status. Energy. Start walking into rooms with genuine enthusiasm, curiosity, and interest. Watch what happens. You become a magnet for the highest quality people. Energy is contagious. Spread the kind you'd want to catch."RIP Dolly Parton Music Intro!Clint Eastwood retires at 96. Good Bad and Ugly. Markets and RetirementGood luck planning if on your own. VERY difficult100's hours building a retirement forecast model. Changing small things like inflation or investment returns by 1% has huge ramifications. Meaning its an ongoing challenge. Markets UpSaaS AcololypseSalesforce Earnings letterWebcast. Up 22% Thursday. Low $150 now $250.~70% up. Claude ForceClaude/Anthropic uses Salesforce and Slack. They are not replacing them. Sales force combining with Claude.NVIDIAPress Release Jensen reminds me of Elon in that he disregards and has NO worry about competition because he is so confident in his team, mission and trajectory. $5T companyUp 4% after hours. $210. 1 year up 17%. 5 yr 850%Americas great opportunity 1000000's of jobs First time in century that we can fix energy grid. This is the new industrial revolution. Autonomous DrivingIts happening! AmazonAmazon Zoox - No steering wheel or pedals - taking the roads in Las Vegas! This is GOOD! Toaster-shaped taxis that don't have a driver or a steering wheel have started rolling across San Francisco and charging for rides in Las Vegas.The all-electric cars are the first robotaxis offering rides on the roads without standard driver features like a dashboard and pedals. They can drive in either direction and hold up to four passengers who sit facing each other. Windows stretch across much of the sides. The vehicles are called Zoox.TeslaHUGE from a media standpoint, article from WSJ on Tesla and FSD.TeslaRobotsJC talking about seeing the robots. Play entire clip. From the latest All In Pod. Thinks it will be best selling product of all time. Better than any video you've seen! Hardware 1.5 generations ahead, and mind 5x more. Optimus will be the greatest product ever made. Says in 10 years will be 1b in 2036From Ashok. Flooding the streets of Austin. Wouldn't say this in public without high confidence. From Elon: Both SpaceX and Tesla building 100gw/yr solar and supplementing with Nat Gas, and to increase rate of production will manufacture the blades and vanes at SpaceX! Will probably take 2-3 years. 100gw/yr is enough to power ~18,000,000 US homes. YES 18m. So together should be 36m homes. SpaceX $3.5T by 2033 per Elon. At modest 10x sales that is 35 trillion. AI DataCenters are Coming. Only question when? Partnering with NVIDIA on new chips/tech for space.Per Elon “Our design is significantly simpler, lower cost, denser and lighter than a traditional rack” You believe him?Play. Video of Elon and team discussing datacenters in Space.  Do people know (1) this was Elon's car and (2) first falcon heavy launch (3) expected to fail and (4) if it didn't fail, wanted to have fun! And (5) orbiting between Earth and Mars. Expects at least 10m years life. JP Morgan on SpaceX Catalysts: SpaceX just bought APR energy. Per Elon aiming for 30 Starship launches per day. By 20301 million people on Mars, plus tranches to 7.5t in Market cap. 30/day is 10800 or ~10k annual. StarBase LouisianaOfficial SpaceX video.3000 direct jobs, 10,000 jobs to Luisiana8 launch towers.Crazy states/politicans are not inviting them to build in their state.  Open letter from Elon to staff. Eliminat bureaucracy. Math to get to 1m people on Mars. Public PolicyCalifornia Tires

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The transcripts from Jes Staley's July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that relationship publicly. Staley acknowledged visiting Epstein's Manhattan townhouse dozens of times, traveling to Little St. James on multiple occasions and exchanging roughly 1,200 communications with Epstein between 2008 and 2012. He admitted that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including details about the bank's business, client relationships, pending transactions and even communications involving the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis. Staley also told investigators that he had discussed his own compensation with Epstein and sought his advice, despite previously portraying Epstein as having little or no connection to his professional life after the 2008 conviction. He further acknowledged having a sexual encounter with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein, while insisting that Epstein did not arrange it and that he had no knowledge that the woman had later accused Epstein of abuse.The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein's cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley's professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The claim that the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is somehow a hoax becomes increasingly difficult to square with the enormous sums major financial institutions are paying to resolve claims brought by survivors. JPMorgan agrees to a roughly $290 million settlement, Deutsche Bank agrees to pay $75 million, and Bank of America later reaches a $72.5 million settlement, bringing those survivor-related agreements alone to hundreds of millions of dollars. These settlements are not criminal convictions and they do not prove that every allegation surrounding Epstein is true, but they show that some of the most sophisticated banks and law firms in the world treat the underlying litigation as serious, costly and dangerous. That reality clashes directly with the political rhetoric that dismisses scrutiny of Epstein's network as conspiracy theory or fabrication. The contradiction becomes even harder to ignore because Epstein remains financially connected to major institutions even after his criminal history is widely known, while regulators and civil litigation expose troubling questions about compliance failures, suspicious transactions and institutional decision-making.The larger point is not that every person associated with Epstein is guilty or that every theory about his operation has been proven. It is that the documented record is already damning enough without exaggeration. Survivors use civil courts to obtain answers, records, testimony and financial accountability that the criminal justice system never fully produces, especially after Epstein dies before trial. In that sense, civil litigation becomes one of the few mechanisms capable of forcing powerful institutions to confront their relationships with him. Calling the entire scandal a hoax requires ignoring the settlements, the regulatory findings, the banking records and the repeated willingness of major institutions to pay enormous sums rather than continue fighting these cases. If someone still wants to dismiss Epstein as a fabrication, they are left with one brutally simple question: if there is really nothing there, what exactly are all these banks paying for?to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Have you ever wondered what would happen if you loosened your grip on the plan and started following what lights you up instead? In this episode, Jessica sits down with Cameron Oaks Rogers: creator of the Freckled Foodie empire, host of Conversations with Cam, mom, and TBMer. Cameron shares how a life-changing accident pushed her to leave her career at JP Morgan, start a food Instagram, and eventually build it into a thriving podcast and community. They talk about testing out new passions before you leap, trusting your gut, fitting manifestation into motherhood, and letting yourself evolve. Cameron also gets real about body image, breaking generational patterns, showing her kids what true self-worth looks like. If you're feeling pulled toward a new career, a creative project, or just a new version of yourself, this episode is your permission slip to begin. Full show notes → https://tobemagnetic.com/expanded-podcast Resources: The Be Seen Challenge Quiet your inner critic, stop playing small, and start manifesting the life you truly want. Now live inside The Pathway. Free Masterclass: Step Into Your F*ck It Energy If you missed our live masterclass with Lacy and Jessica — don't worry, you can still watch the replay! Learn how to step into your f*ck it energy and feel genuinely safe being seen. Join the Pathway Membership Use code EXPANDED for 20% off your first month! The Pathway Membership gives you unlimited access to all of our manifestation workshops—including How to Manifest, Unblocking Your Inner Child, Shadow, Love, Money, Rock Bottoms, Ruts, and Energetic Updates —plus 70+ self-hypnosis tracks designed to unlock your full potential. LEARN MORE HERE Get the latest from TBM Join the Pathway now - Return to Magic Challenge, Money Challenge, and Nervous System Reset available now! New to TBM? Free Offerings to Get You Started Learn the Process! Expanded Podcast - How to Manifest Anything You Desire Get Expanded! The Motivation - Testimonial Library Ready to find out what's holding you back? Try our Free Clarity Exercise Be an EXPANDER! Share Your Manifestation Story Submit to Be a Process Guest What did you manifest during the Be Seen Challenge? Share a voice note of your question, block, or Process to be featured in an episode! This Episode Is Brought to You By: Our Place - Get 10% off sitewide with code TBM fromourplace.com/TBM Wonder Oven Pro Always Pan Blueland - Get 15% off your first order at Blueland.com/TBM PowerDuo Laundry Tablets In this episode we talk about: Following intuitive pings toward a more authentic career and life Cameron's transition from JPMorgan sales and trading to entrepreneurship How Freckled Foodie began as an anonymous food Instagram Taking aligned action before knowing exactly where it will lead Stress-testing a passion or side hustle before leaving your job Cameron's accident and the unexpected clarity that came from slowing down Building a financial runway before taking a career leap Learning through experimentation and saying yes before deciding what fits Why evolving beyond your original niche can be a sign of authenticity Healing body image patterns and generational self-criticism Modeling positive body language and self-worth for children Dividing household labor through complete ownership to reduce the mental load Separating career status, money, and external validation from self-worth Mentioned In the Episode: Listen to Conversations with Cam Quiet Your Mind - Kids Edition ​​Fair Play by Eve Rodksy Ep. 318 — Speeding Up Your Manifestations in the New Paradigm with Jenna Zoe Find our Be Seen Challenge plus all our workshops and all workshops mentioned inside our Pathway Membership! (Including the Plant the Seed, Magnetic Desires DI, and Rooted in Abundance DI) Connect with Cameron Instagram: @cameronoaksrogers & @conversationswithcam TikTok: @cameronoaksrogers & @conversations_with_cam Website: cameronoaksrogers.com & Quiet Your Mind HOW TO MANIFEST by Lacy Phillips (with exercises by Jessica Gill)Available now! The Expanded Podcast, from To Be Magnetic™ (TBM), is the leading manifestation podcast rooted in neuroscience, psychology, and energetics. Hosted by TBM's Chief Content Officer Jessica Gill, with monthly appearances from founder Lacy Phillips, Expanded is where science and the mystical meet to help you manifest in the most grounded, practical, and life-changing way.At TBM, we've redefined manifestation through Neural Manifestation™—our proven, science-backed method developed with neuroscientist Dr. Tara Swart. This process helps you reprogram limiting beliefs at the subconscious level so you can create the life most aligned with your authenticity.Each week, we take you inside the TBM practice to help you expand your subconscious to believe what you desire is possible. Through expert interviews, thought leader conversations, TBM teachings, and real member success stories, you'll learn how to: – Rewire your subconscious mind and step into your worth – Heal your inner child and integrate shadow work – Set boundaries, strengthen intuition, and reclaim self-worth – Manifest relationships, careers, abundance, and experiences that align with your true selfWith over than 40 million downloads and a global community in over 100 countries, Expanded has become the gold standard in manifestation content. Think of it as your weekly practice for expanding your mind, believing what you want is possible, and manifesting the life you're meant to live.Past guests include leading voices such as Mel Robbins, Lewis Howes, Jenna Zoe, Martha Beck, Dr. Joe Dispenza, Dr. Gabor Maté, Mark Groves, and Brianna Wiest. Where To Find Us!@tobemagnetic (IG)@LacyannephillipsLacy Launched a Substack! - By Candlelight - Join Here@Jessicaashleygill@tobemagnetic (youtube)@expandedpodcast

Former Barclays chief Jes Staley told House Oversight Committee investigators that he had a sexual encounter with one of Jeffrey Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein. Staley said he first met the unnamed woman at Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and that their conversations eventually became flirtatious. According to his testimony, the woman later invited him to her Upper East Side apartment sometime around 2009 or 2010, where they had what he described as a single consensual sexual encounter. Staley insisted Epstein had not arranged the meeting, claimed he never told Epstein about it and said he had no knowledge of Epstein directing women to have sex with his associates. Investigators also informed Staley that the woman had later sued Epstein alleging sexual abuse and reached a settlement with Epstein's estate, something Staley said he had not known. The questioning came amid congressional scrutiny of Staley's extraordinarily close relationship with Epstein, including roughly 1,200 communications exchanged between the two from 2008 through 2012 while Staley headed JPMorgan's Private Bank and Epstein remained a client.Investigators also confronted Staley with some of the more disturbing and suggestive correspondence contained in the released Epstein material. In July 2010, Staley had written to Epstein, “Say hi to Snow White,” prompting Epstein to ask what character Staley wanted next, to which Staley replied, “Beauty and the Beast.” Another message sent to Epstein around the same time referenced a woman in a Snow White costume having sex shortly after putting it on, and investigators showed Staley a photograph Epstein had circulated of a young woman dressed as the Disney character. Staley maintained that he did not remember seeing a woman dressed as Snow White at Epstein's residence, denied having sex with anyone wearing such a costume and said he did not recognize the woman in the photograph. His testimony therefore added another uncomfortable layer to the long-running scrutiny of his relationship with Epstein: Staley acknowledged becoming sexually involved with a woman he met inside Epstein's orbit while simultaneously denying that Epstein facilitated the encounter or that he understood what was happening to women around Epstein.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonnail.comsource:Ex-Barclays chief Jes Staley details his ‘intimate encounter' with Jeffrey Epstein's assistant  to House investigatorsb

The claim that the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is somehow a hoax becomes increasingly difficult to square with the enormous sums major financial institutions are paying to resolve claims brought by survivors. JPMorgan agrees to a roughly $290 million settlement, Deutsche Bank agrees to pay $75 million, and Bank of America later reaches a $72.5 million settlement, bringing those survivor-related agreements alone to hundreds of millions of dollars. These settlements are not criminal convictions and they do not prove that every allegation surrounding Epstein is true, but they show that some of the most sophisticated banks and law firms in the world treat the underlying litigation as serious, costly and dangerous. That reality clashes directly with the political rhetoric that dismisses scrutiny of Epstein's network as conspiracy theory or fabrication. The contradiction becomes even harder to ignore because Epstein remains financially connected to major institutions even after his criminal history is widely known, while regulators and civil litigation expose troubling questions about compliance failures, suspicious transactions and institutional decision-making.The larger point is not that every person associated with Epstein is guilty or that every theory about his operation has been proven. It is that the documented record is already damning enough without exaggeration. Survivors use civil courts to obtain answers, records, testimony and financial accountability that the criminal justice system never fully produces, especially after Epstein dies before trial. In that sense, civil litigation becomes one of the few mechanisms capable of forcing powerful institutions to confront their relationships with him. Calling the entire scandal a hoax requires ignoring the settlements, the regulatory findings, the banking records and the repeated willingness of major institutions to pay enormous sums rather than continue fighting these cases. If someone still wants to dismiss Epstein as a fabrication, they are left with one brutally simple question: if there is really nothing there, what exactly are all these banks paying for?to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Former Barclays chief Jes Staley told House Oversight Committee investigators that he had a sexual encounter with one of Jeffrey Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein. Staley said he first met the unnamed woman at Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and that their conversations eventually became flirtatious. According to his testimony, the woman later invited him to her Upper East Side apartment sometime around 2009 or 2010, where they had what he described as a single consensual sexual encounter. Staley insisted Epstein had not arranged the meeting, claimed he never told Epstein about it and said he had no knowledge of Epstein directing women to have sex with his associates. Investigators also informed Staley that the woman had later sued Epstein alleging sexual abuse and reached a settlement with Epstein's estate, something Staley said he had not known. The questioning came amid congressional scrutiny of Staley's extraordinarily close relationship with Epstein, including roughly 1,200 communications exchanged between the two from 2008 through 2012 while Staley headed JPMorgan's Private Bank and Epstein remained a client.Investigators also confronted Staley with some of the more disturbing and suggestive correspondence contained in the released Epstein material. In July 2010, Staley had written to Epstein, “Say hi to Snow White,” prompting Epstein to ask what character Staley wanted next, to which Staley replied, “Beauty and the Beast.” Another message sent to Epstein around the same time referenced a woman in a Snow White costume having sex shortly after putting it on, and investigators showed Staley a photograph Epstein had circulated of a young woman dressed as the Disney character. Staley maintained that he did not remember seeing a woman dressed as Snow White at Epstein's residence, denied having sex with anyone wearing such a costume and said he did not recognize the woman in the photograph. His testimony therefore added another uncomfortable layer to the long-running scrutiny of his relationship with Epstein: Staley acknowledged becoming sexually involved with a woman he met inside Epstein's orbit while simultaneously denying that Epstein facilitated the encounter or that he understood what was happening to women around Epstein.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonnail.comsource:Ex-Barclays chief Jes Staley details his ‘intimate encounter' with Jeffrey Epstein's assistant  to House investigatorsbBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In der heutigen Folge sprechen die Finanzjournalisten Daniel Eckert und Lea Oetjen über das Rekordhoch der Allianz, einen erneuten Kurssprung bei Moderna und einen echten Dämpfer für Sportartikel-Konzerne. Außerdem geht es um Nvidia, Micron, Dick's Sporting Goods, Nike, Under Armour, Adidas, Puma, Merck & Co., SpaceX, Siemens Energy, Deutz, Infineon, Suss Microtec, Deutsche Börse, Alphabet, Volkswagen, Goldman Sachs, CVC, EQT, Brookfield, KKR, BlackRock, JPMorgan, iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond (WKN: A2H6ZT), iShares EUR Flexible Income Bond Active (WKN: A40JYG), JPMorgan Global IG Corporate Bond Active (WKN: A414MF), Pimco Euro Short Maturity (WKN: A1H497), JPMorgan Global Aggregate Bond Active ETF EUR Hedged (WKN: A3EMZ4). Am 2. Oktober findet unser „Alles auf Aktien"-Summit in Berlin statt. Ihr wollt dabei sein? Wir verlosen Tickets: Schreibt uns eine Mail an AAA@WELT.de und begründet, warum ihr unbedingt gewinnen solltet. Falls ihr euer Glück nicht dem Zufall überlassen wollt, bekommt ihr mit dem Code „AAAFRIENDS“ satte 50 Prozent Rabatt aufs Ticket – aber nur über diesen Link: https://veranstaltung.businessinsider.de/event/financesummit26/summary?rp=c6dc55d6-6f4f-4fb4-b75f-3f3501d84859 Wir freuen uns an Feedback über aaa@welt.de. Noch mehr "Alles auf Aktien" findet Ihr bei WELTplus und Apple Podcasts – inklusive aller Artikel der Hosts. Hier bei WELT: https://www.welt.de/podcasts/alles-auf-aktien/plus247399208/Boersen-Podcast-AAA-Bonus-Folgen-Jede-Woche-noch-mehr-Antworten-auf-Eure-Boersen-Fragen.html. Hier könnt ihr den AAA-Newsletter abonnieren: https://www.welt.de/newsletter/article232797673/Alles-auf-Aktien-Der-taegliche-Boersen-Newsletter-fuer-WELTplus-Abonnenten.html Und – ganz neu: AAA gibt es jetzt auch auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/alles_auf_aktien/ Disclaimer: Die im Podcast besprochenen Aktien und Fonds stellen keine spezifischen Kauf- oder Anlage-Empfehlungen dar. Die Moderatoren und der Verlag haften nicht für etwaige Verluste, die aufgrund der Umsetzung der Gedanken oder Ideen entstehen. Hörtipps: Für alle, die noch mehr wissen wollen: Holger Zschäpitz können Sie jede Woche im Finanz- und Wirtschaftspodcast "Deffner&Zschäpitz" hören. +++ Werbung +++ Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte! https://linktr.ee/alles_auf_aktien Anzeige: Eight Sleep: Der Pod 5 reguliert die Temperatur im Bett automatisch, trackt Schlaf- und Gesundheitswerte ohne Wearable und kann so zu besserem Schlaf beitragen. Mit dem Code ALLESAUFAKTIEN erhaltet ihr auf https://www.eightsleep.com/allesaufaktien bis zu 350 Euro Rabatt. Impressum: https://www.welt.de/services/article7893735/Impressum.html Datenschutz: https://www.welt.de/services/article157550705/Datenschutzerklaerung-WELT-DIGITAL.html

In this episode of Shift AI, Manos, CEO of Umi, Patrick Thompson, CEO of Clarify, Brian Hall, CMO of Mistral AI, and Ben Gaffney, Deputy General Counsel at OpenAI, join host Boaz Ashkenazy for a live panel recorded at Seattle Tech Week on who actually owns intelligence in the enterprise AI era.One panelist argues that any enterprise still treating a frontier model as its core intelligence layer is renting something it should own, and predicts that in two years we'll look back at CTOs defending that approach the way we look back at driving a Ferrari to the grocery store. Another panelist, sitting inside one of the most closely watched policy fights in AI right now, explains why the debate over open source models and national security is getting a lot less theoretical, and a lot more real, by the month.This one is for CTOs and CIOs deciding whether to build or rent their AI stack, product leaders at vertical AI startups thinking about fine-tuning their own models, and anyone tracking the open source AI security and policy debate.Chapters[00:00] Welcome and thanks to sponsors JP Morgan and Ascend[01:30] Introducing the panel: Manos, Patrick, Brian, and Ben[03:54] From foundation model hype to vertical AI, what actually changed[07:37] How Clarify balances owning the system of record with using frontier models[09:44] Rising model bills, local models, and the push toward open weights[11:30] Mistral AI, sovereign AI, and why owning your intelligence matters[14:32] Data retention, training, and what the privacy debate is really about[19:10] Chinese open models, national security, and the safety debate[26:18] Why fine-tuning beats prompting for real vertical AI companies[30:43] What enterprises actually want from foundation models right now[35:35] What CIOs and CTOs will laugh about in two years[44:47] The hundred million dollar question: where the panel would invest[51:44] Advice for a 22-year-old about to spend ten years building something[53:31] What each panelist is most excited about in AI's futureConnect with the PanelistsManos (Umi) - https://www.linkedin.com/in/koukoumidis/Patrick Thompson (Clarify) - https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrickt010/Brian Hall (Mistral AI) - https://www.linkedin.com/in/brhall/Ben Gaffney (OpenAI) - https://www.linkedin.com/in/bengaffney/Connect with Boaz AshkenazyLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/boazashkenazy/Email: info@shiftai.fm

Brandon Sedloff sits down with Dan Carr and Peter Weiss, co-founders of Alpaca Real Estate, for a live conversation recorded at their annual Aspen Real Estate Summit. The two met as analysts at JP Morgan in 2011 and spent a decade building expertise at major institutions before launching their own opportunistic real estate private equity fund in late 2022. What sets Alpaca apart is their commitment to building a technology-first culture from inception, treating their data infrastructure and tech stack as foundational to the investment process rather than an afterthought. They discuss: - Why timing mattered when they saw the Fed's rate increases creating a repricing moment in commercial real estate - How they built a seven-stage deal pipeline with 1,000 transactions cataloged in a proprietary data lake before deploying agentic AI - Their focus on tailwind asset classes like build-to-rent townhomes and infill industrial, where structural demand drives conviction - The cultural challenge of technology adoption and why organic buy-in matters more than mandates - Forward purchase structures that shift construction risk to homebuilders while controlling land upfront This episode offers a practical look at what it takes to launch and scale an investment platform built on data discipline and institutional-grade operations in a shifting market. Topics: (00:00:00) - Intro (00:01:00) - Recording live at Alpaca's Aspen summit (00:05:20) - Getting into real estate investing (00:10:23) - Meeting at JP Morgan in 2011 (00:11:35) - Building the REPEN networking group (00:12:34) - Post-JP Morgan career paths (00:15:27) - The 2022 wake-up call from Dan (00:17:49) - Capitalizing a first-time fund (00:18:35) - Building technology into the DNA (00:22:56) - Creating clean data infrastructure (00:26:55) - Cultural adoption of technology (00:31:42) - Alpaca's investment focus today (00:33:45) - Residential and industrial strategies (00:36:04) - Operating with partners versus direct (00:38:38) - Closing thoughts for investors Links: Dan on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-carr-98a0a91b/ Peter on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-weiss-86675635/ Alpaca Real Estate - https://alpacarealestate.com/ Brandon on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/bsedloff/ Juniper Square - https://www.junipersquare.com/

Donald Hugh McIntyre passed in 2025, but is remembered as one of the most insightful polymaths... while his blog Etherplan lives on. The episode came out in the first week of February 2019, ran two hours, and set the genetic code for Bitcoin Takeover podcast. Time stamps: 00:02:45 – Introduction: who is Donald McIntyre 00:04:49 – Was Bitcoin inevitable? 00:06:29 – 10,000 years of top-down structures vs 3.5 million years of evolution 00:08:27 – Cypherpunks: Chaum, Tim May, Nick Szabo 00:09:43 – The ancient desire for unconfiscatable money 00:11:55 – Bitcoin as a bottom-up system 00:12:39 – Living in a dual world: banks vs private keys 00:15:02 – Trusted third parties are security holes 00:16:40 – Nick Szabo's social scalability explained 00:18:27 – Why banking excludes: the unbanked in the US and Latin America 00:20:14 – Privacy, intelligence agencies & the false sense of security 00:21:13 – Is Bitcoin enough to make people demand decentralization? 00:23:23 – Asia's interest in Ethereum Classic & immutability 00:24:51 – Mt. Gox, breaches & untrustworthy third parties 00:25:57 – Not your keys, not your coins 00:27:28 – JP Morgan's building & the marketing of strength 00:28:45 – The instant gratification bribe 00:29:58 – The tradeoff: security means inefficiency 00:31:27 – The high performance fallacy 00:32:26 – Decentralization theater & scammers 00:33:48 – Hyperbitcoinization: elites first or the people who need it? 00:36:26 – The jet set analogy: how technologies bootstrap 00:40:54 – The Lindy effect 00:41:47 – The geeks got in before the bankers 00:43:25 – The token as intrinsic to the protocol 00:46:27 – Bitcoin as a biological invention 00:47:02 – How Nick Szabo thinks (and why he went to law school) 00:48:38 – Shelling Out: the origins of money 00:51:20 – The 150-person brain & money as a bridge between strangers 00:52:39 – Dawkins & reciprocal altruism 00:53:52 – Stone tools, subjective value & the first trade 00:56:15 – Reading Szabo 30 times: one article = six months of university 01:00:52 – Lomekwi, Oldowan & Acheulean: Donald's stone tool theory 01:03:42 – Stashes of hand axes as prehistoric vaults 01:04:58 – Is money millions of years old? 01:07:51 – Darwin, Dawkins & John Maynard Smith 01:08:31 – The logic of animal conflict 01:10:53 – Territory, asymmetry & conflict minimization 01:12:08 – Money as a conflict minimization device 01:12:36 – Bitcoin's game theory & the Byzantine generals problem 01:15:32 – Chimpanzees, bipedalism & why our brains grew 01:17:19 – Bitcoin carnivores 01:17:40 – Szabo & Satoshi: the Newton-Leibniz parallel 01:19:23 – Satoshi's credits: bit gold, RPOW, Hashcash, b-money 01:19:59 – The mystery of Wei Dai 01:20:54 – Remembering Tim May 01:21:53 – The JW Weatherman interview & the CoinDesk piece 01:23:40 – Tim May as the father figure who was never satisfied 01:24:39 – Why not David Chaum? The Elixxir disappointment 01:26:35 – Never underestimate the elders 01:28:08 – What the cypherpunks built: Tor, WikiLeaks, BitTorrent 01:30:17 – Napster, Megaupload & the raid in New Zealand 01:30:30 – Cryptography as a wall: violence made useless 01:34:10 – The shifting Ethereum narrative 01:35:27 – World computer: a marketing confession 01:38:11 – The spectrum from marketers to scammers 01:39:59 – The DAO fork fight & leaving for Ethereum Classic 01:40:44 – What Ethereum Classic adds to Bitcoin 01:41:17 – Liquid & RSK: glorified trusted third parties 01:41:57 – Turing completeness on the base layer 01:43:48 – The future: four or five networks 01:44:26 – ETC's monetary policy: 210 to 230 million 01:46:19 – The 51% attack that happened that week 01:47:48 – 220,000 ETC, 15 double spends & 5,000 confirmations 01:49:15 – The $5,000 ETC thesis 01:50:37 – What happens when Ethereum moves to proof of stake 01:51:37 – ProgPoW, the issuance cut & doing everything wrong 01:52:16 – The Nick Johnson poll on reversing double spends 01:52:54 – The Parity bailout & the precedent of the DAO 01:54:53 – Bitcoin: soft forks, Schnorr & the SHA-256 exception 01:57:09 – Governments will never voluntarily give up fiat 01:59:14 – Donald's criticisms of Bitcoin 02:00:02 – The 21 million cap as a political decision 02:01:13 – The miner lobby scenario, 40 years from now 02:02:09 – Merge mining, drivechains & the super miners 02:02:14 – Miners as the future Google and Apple 02:04:46 – Paul Sztorc, Truth Coin & the guest suggestion 02:05:40 – "Do you think I have a chance with Nick Szabo?" 02:06:31 – The selfish joy of podcasting 02:09:51 – Enlightening, a Lightning pun & goodbye

The U.S. Virgin Islands carried out one of the broadest and most consequential investigations into Jeffrey Epstein because the territory was central to both his personal life and his financial structure. Epstein owned Little St. James and later Great St. James, operated multiple companies there, received substantial tax benefits through the territory, and used the islands as private, heavily controlled locations where numerous women and girls said they were abused. After his 2019 arrest and death, USVI authorities aggressively pursued his estate, employees, business entities, financial records and professional relationships in an effort to understand how his operation functioned and who helped sustain it. The investigation was not limited to the assaults themselves; it followed the money, corporate structures, travel, property transfers, tax arrangements and the network of people who kept Epstein's world running. Territorial officials ultimately alleged that Epstein had used the Virgin Islands as a base for a sex-trafficking enterprise while simultaneously enjoying extraordinary privacy, wealth and institutional access.The investigation then expanded far beyond Epstein's estate and into the financial institutions that had serviced him for years. The USVI sued JPMorgan, arguing that the bank had ignored repeated warning signs while continuing to process Epstein's money and benefit from the relationship, and the litigation exposed internal communications, compliance concerns and testimony from senior executives. The territory also reached a settlement worth more than $100 million with Epstein's estate and later secured a $75 million settlement from JPMorgan. Taken together, the USVI cases helped shift the Epstein story away from the idea of a lone predator and toward a much broader examination of the systems that enabled him, including banks, lawyers, accountants, employees and corporate entities. By the time the litigation had run its course, the Virgin Islands had forced the release of a significant amount of material about Epstein's finances and operations and had done more than most jurisdictions to expose how deeply his wealth, criminal conduct and institutional relationships had been intertwined.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Market Mondays is back with a breakdown of the biggest stories moving markets. We cover the bond market, what history says about stocks around midterm elections, warning signs from the VIX, and the biggest investing mistakes people are making right now.We dive into NVIDIA ahead of earnings, Jensen Huang's AI strategy, changing valuations, memory pricing, Micron, CrowdStrike, and the future of the AI trade. We also look at McDonald's as an economic signal, CAVA vs. Chipotle, and why time in the market can beat constantly trading.Plus, we close with audience questions and a rapid-fire This or That featuring Costco vs. McDonald's, Tesla vs. BYD, Robinhood vs. Meta, Bloom Energy vs. JPMorgan, Google vs. Stryker, and more. #MarketMondays #Investing #StockMarket #NVIDIA #NVDA #AI #Bitcoin #Trading #Finance #Wealth #EarnYourLeisureAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

In this episode of Parker Gals, Liz Xu sits down with her former JPMorgan colleague and friend Caroline Carman, Senior Associate at Rallyday Partners, a lower middle market private equity firm based in Denver, Colorado. Caroline shares her journey from leveraged finance analyst to becoming Rallyday's first associate, building the firm's junior team from the ground up. We dive into what drew her to private equity, the transition from heads-down number crunching to providing strategic thought partnership to portco management teams, and the mentor who shaped her career along the way. Plus, why the "PE guy" stereotype isn't accurate, why she will always identify with Monica on "Friends," and the lesson Caroline wishes she'd learned earlier.

A.M. Edition for Aug. 20. Nearly six months into the war, President Trump is pledging a ‘crushing economic operation' to isolate Iran. WSJ's Georgi Kantchev explains why a push to get just one country, the United Arab Emirates, to go along with that won't be easy. Plus, packaged-food giants head to the lab as users of weight-loss drugs say no to once-beloved foods. And we'll look at why more AI developers are likely to follow Google's lead in buying up a defunct airline's old emails and payroll files. Luke Vargas hosts. Sign up for the WSJ's free What's News newsletter. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

MileProtection - Your hard earned miles deserve protection. Join the waitlist! (sponsored) - https://milestomemories.com/go/mile-protection/ Chase quietly added language to the Sapphire Reserve hotel credit that would have killed a way people were using it, and then just as quietly took it back out. Somebody at JP Morgan even emailed us about the article. There are also targeted Sapphire offers floating around that are better than anything public, including 175,000 points, and if you were shut down by Capital One years ago you may want to go check whether your Discover account is still open. Plus Discover's $2 forgiveness is dead, weird new 48 month language nobody can explain, and a couple of no lifetime language links worth knowing about. Let us know in the comments if you have ever been targeted for one of these offers. Episode Guide: 0:00 Welcome to MTM Travel 0:22 Back to School & Raising Polite Kids 5:56 The Social Media Cadence Problem 7:25 Why Honest Reviews Make People Angry 10:48 Chase Changes the Terms, Then Reverses 14:02 Targeted Sapphire Offers Up to 175K 17:58 Capital One Is Closing Discover Accounts 18:15 The $2 Forgiveness Is Gone 22:17 Discover's Strange 48 Month Language 26:58 First Credit Cards & the Flip-Out Keychain 28:37 Thrifty Traveler's 30% Off Sale 31:04 Coming Monday: Tokyo & Philippine Airlines 31:33 No Lifetime Language Bonvoy Links 34:45 Final Thoughts   Links Thrifty Traveler 30% off ends August 20, 2026 - https://milestomemories.com/go/thrifty-traveler/ Edit Credit - https://milestomemories.com/chase-updates-terms-for-back-to-back-the-edit-stays/ Chase targeted card offers up to 175K - https://milestomemories.com/targeted-increased-chase-sapphire-card-offers/ Cap One shutdowns - https://www.doctorofcredit.com/capital-one-shutdowns-can-cause-discover-shutdowns-ymmv/ Cap One Discover 48 month language - https://milestomemories.com/discover-48-month-language/ Amex Marriott no lifetime language - https://milestomemories.com/nll-links-for-amex-marriott-bonvoy-brilliant-and-bevy-cards/ ✈️ Track your travel credit cards for free

JPMorgan Chase, America's largest bank, just made a big bet on housing—a $750B bet to be exact. At a time when most people hope home prices will fall, JPMorgan is gearing up to lend and invest in a huge way. Could this be a sign that those who buy now will be thanking themselves in the years to come? We're getting into the details in today's show. It's another housing market update! First, we're touching on whether or not the market has already peaked in 2026. We still have four full months left in the year, but with home sales falling in July, it could signal that the hot summer is starting to cool. But a surprising type of home is still selling fast—it's not the newly renovated house flip—it's the ugly, outdated home next door. Why? We're explaining in this episode. JPMorgan Chase makes a $750B bet on housing, signaling that America's largest bank is bullish on a certain type of real estate. Finally, the latest inflation rate update—the CPI (consumer price index) stayed in check last month, but is it enough to stop the Federal Reserve from raising rates? In This Episode We Cover Inside JPMorgan Chase's $750B investment into affordable housing  The latest inflation rate update and what it could mean for your interest rate Why buyers don't want your renovated home (they want the ugly one next door) A new 2026 home sale prediction and whether or not prices are still rising Two types of homes that are selling fast in 2026 (and why yours might not be) And So Much More! Links from the Show Join the Future of Real Estate Investing with Fundrise Join BiggerPockets for FREE Join us at the BiggerPockets Conference October 2-4 in Orlando. Buy tickets Sign Up for the Investor Brief Newsletter Find Investor-Friendly Lenders JPMorgan Chase's $750B Investment Inflation Update On The Market 436 - The Fed Signals a Reversal in Rates Henry's BiggerPockets Profile James' BiggerPockets Profile Kathy's BiggerPockets Profile Find Real Estate Deals That Work in Today's Market with Henry's Book, Real Estate Deal Maker Check out more resources from this show on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠BiggerPockets.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/on-the-market-453. Interested in learning more about today's sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠advertise@biggerpockets.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Senator Ron Wyden's Senate Finance Committee investigation concluded that major Wall Street institutions repeatedly failed to detect, scrutinize, and promptly report financial activity that helped sustain Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The report focused primarily on JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, alleging significant failures under federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Investigators found that Epstein moved enormous amounts of money through the banking system, including millions in cash withdrawals and thousands of wire transfers, while banks frequently failed to file timely suspicious-activity reports. JPMorgan alone retroactively flagged thousands of transactions worth more than $1 billion years after much of the activity occurred, while Deutsche Bank later identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable transactions. The report also examined roughly $170 million that billionaire Leon Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax and estate-planning services, arguing that Bank of America failed to adequately investigate payments so unusual that the bank eventually acknowledged they lacked a verifiable business purpose. Wyden's investigators alleged that senior bankers knew Epstein presented serious reputational and compliance risks, yet continued protecting or cultivating the relationship because Epstein himself was lucrative and because he provided access to other extraordinarily wealthy clients.The report portrayed those failures not as isolated mistakes but as a systemic breakdown in which wealth and profitability repeatedly outweighed meaningful compliance. It alleged that JPMorgan executives continued interacting with Epstein even after the bank removed him as a client in 2013, while suspicious activity was not comprehensively reported to federal authorities until after his 2019 arrest. Wyden's staff called for federal investigations of individual bankers at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, as well as Epstein associates Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, and Harry Beller, arguing that individuals involved in moving or overseeing Epstein's money deserved greater scrutiny. The report also emphasized the absence of meaningful accountability, noting that Epstein-related banks, his estate, and Leon Black had collectively paid more than $900 million in settlements and penalties while most bankers identified in the investigation had faced no known regulatory or financial consequences. It further accused several banks of refusing to cooperate voluntarily with Wyden's investigation. In response, Wyden proposed strengthening anti-money-laundering laws by requiring senior officials to personally attest that ultra-high-net-worth accounts had been properly monitored, imposing stronger penalties on bankers who failed to report suspicious activity, requiring enhanced scrutiny of transactions involving high-risk clients, and mandating prompt government notification when banks terminate customers because of suspected criminal or suspicious financial behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Senator Ron Wyden's Senate Finance Committee investigation concluded that major Wall Street institutions repeatedly failed to detect, scrutinize, and promptly report financial activity that helped sustain Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The report focused primarily on JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, alleging significant failures under federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Investigators found that Epstein moved enormous amounts of money through the banking system, including millions in cash withdrawals and thousands of wire transfers, while banks frequently failed to file timely suspicious-activity reports. JPMorgan alone retroactively flagged thousands of transactions worth more than $1 billion years after much of the activity occurred, while Deutsche Bank later identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable transactions. The report also examined roughly $170 million that billionaire Leon Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax and estate-planning services, arguing that Bank of America failed to adequately investigate payments so unusual that the bank eventually acknowledged they lacked a verifiable business purpose. Wyden's investigators alleged that senior bankers knew Epstein presented serious reputational and compliance risks, yet continued protecting or cultivating the relationship because Epstein himself was lucrative and because he provided access to other extraordinarily wealthy clients.The report portrayed those failures not as isolated mistakes but as a systemic breakdown in which wealth and profitability repeatedly outweighed meaningful compliance. It alleged that JPMorgan executives continued interacting with Epstein even after the bank removed him as a client in 2013, while suspicious activity was not comprehensively reported to federal authorities until after his 2019 arrest. Wyden's staff called for federal investigations of individual bankers at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, as well as Epstein associates Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, and Harry Beller, arguing that individuals involved in moving or overseeing Epstein's money deserved greater scrutiny. The report also emphasized the absence of meaningful accountability, noting that Epstein-related banks, his estate, and Leon Black had collectively paid more than $900 million in settlements and penalties while most bankers identified in the investigation had faced no known regulatory or financial consequences. It further accused several banks of refusing to cooperate voluntarily with Wyden's investigation. In response, Wyden proposed strengthening anti-money-laundering laws by requiring senior officials to personally attest that ultra-high-net-worth accounts had been properly monitored, imposing stronger penalties on bankers who failed to report suspicious activity, requiring enhanced scrutiny of transactions involving high-risk clients, and mandating prompt government notification when banks terminate customers because of suspected criminal or suspicious financial behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Senator Ron Wyden's Senate Finance Committee investigation concluded that major Wall Street institutions repeatedly failed to detect, scrutinize, and promptly report financial activity that helped sustain Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The report focused primarily on JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, alleging significant failures under federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Investigators found that Epstein moved enormous amounts of money through the banking system, including millions in cash withdrawals and thousands of wire transfers, while banks frequently failed to file timely suspicious-activity reports. JPMorgan alone retroactively flagged thousands of transactions worth more than $1 billion years after much of the activity occurred, while Deutsche Bank later identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable transactions. The report also examined roughly $170 million that billionaire Leon Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax and estate-planning services, arguing that Bank of America failed to adequately investigate payments so unusual that the bank eventually acknowledged they lacked a verifiable business purpose. Wyden's investigators alleged that senior bankers knew Epstein presented serious reputational and compliance risks, yet continued protecting or cultivating the relationship because Epstein himself was lucrative and because he provided access to other extraordinarily wealthy clients.The report portrayed those failures not as isolated mistakes but as a systemic breakdown in which wealth and profitability repeatedly outweighed meaningful compliance. It alleged that JPMorgan executives continued interacting with Epstein even after the bank removed him as a client in 2013, while suspicious activity was not comprehensively reported to federal authorities until after his 2019 arrest. Wyden's staff called for federal investigations of individual bankers at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, as well as Epstein associates Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, and Harry Beller, arguing that individuals involved in moving or overseeing Epstein's money deserved greater scrutiny. The report also emphasized the absence of meaningful accountability, noting that Epstein-related banks, his estate, and Leon Black had collectively paid more than $900 million in settlements and penalties while most bankers identified in the investigation had faced no known regulatory or financial consequences. It further accused several banks of refusing to cooperate voluntarily with Wyden's investigation. In response, Wyden proposed strengthening anti-money-laundering laws by requiring senior officials to personally attest that ultra-high-net-worth accounts had been properly monitored, imposing stronger penalties on bankers who failed to report suspicious activity, requiring enhanced scrutiny of transactions involving high-risk clients, and mandating prompt government notification when banks terminate customers because of suspected criminal or suspicious financial behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

CannCon and Ashe in America continue through The New Alchemy section of The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin, landing on Chapter 12: Sink the Lusitania. This week the hosts dig into JP Morgan's role financing England and France during World War I, and the far less patriotic reasons America may have ended up in that war at all. They trace the origin story most of us learned in school, the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and challenge the idea that it was ever really the cause rather than just the spark. Expect a hard look at how loans, politics, and a certain infamous ship collided to shift American public opinion, along with the hosts' usual candid detours into modern health, big pharma, and everything in between. Heavy subject matter this week, handled with the show's signature mix of bluntness and heart.

Senator Ron Wyden's Senate Finance Committee investigation concluded that major Wall Street institutions repeatedly failed to detect, scrutinize, and promptly report financial activity that helped sustain Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The report focused primarily on JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, alleging significant failures under federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Investigators found that Epstein moved enormous amounts of money through the banking system, including millions in cash withdrawals and thousands of wire transfers, while banks frequently failed to file timely suspicious-activity reports. JPMorgan alone retroactively flagged thousands of transactions worth more than $1 billion years after much of the activity occurred, while Deutsche Bank later identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable transactions. The report also examined roughly $170 million that billionaire Leon Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax and estate-planning services, arguing that Bank of America failed to adequately investigate payments so unusual that the bank eventually acknowledged they lacked a verifiable business purpose. Wyden's investigators alleged that senior bankers knew Epstein presented serious reputational and compliance risks, yet continued protecting or cultivating the relationship because Epstein himself was lucrative and because he provided access to other extraordinarily wealthy clients.The report portrayed those failures not as isolated mistakes but as a systemic breakdown in which wealth and profitability repeatedly outweighed meaningful compliance. It alleged that JPMorgan executives continued interacting with Epstein even after the bank removed him as a client in 2013, while suspicious activity was not comprehensively reported to federal authorities until after his 2019 arrest. Wyden's staff called for federal investigations of individual bankers at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, as well as Epstein associates Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, and Harry Beller, arguing that individuals involved in moving or overseeing Epstein's money deserved greater scrutiny. The report also emphasized the absence of meaningful accountability, noting that Epstein-related banks, his estate, and Leon Black had collectively paid more than $900 million in settlements and penalties while most bankers identified in the investigation had faced no known regulatory or financial consequences. It further accused several banks of refusing to cooperate voluntarily with Wyden's investigation. In response, Wyden proposed strengthening anti-money-laundering laws by requiring senior officials to personally attest that ultra-high-net-worth accounts had been properly monitored, imposing stronger penalties on bankers who failed to report suspicious activity, requiring enhanced scrutiny of transactions involving high-risk clients, and mandating prompt government notification when banks terminate customers because of suspected criminal or suspicious financial behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Senator Ron Wyden's Senate Finance Committee investigation concluded that major Wall Street institutions repeatedly failed to detect, scrutinize, and promptly report financial activity that helped sustain Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The report focused primarily on JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, alleging significant failures under federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Investigators found that Epstein moved enormous amounts of money through the banking system, including millions in cash withdrawals and thousands of wire transfers, while banks frequently failed to file timely suspicious-activity reports. JPMorgan alone retroactively flagged thousands of transactions worth more than $1 billion years after much of the activity occurred, while Deutsche Bank later identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable transactions. The report also examined roughly $170 million that billionaire Leon Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax and estate-planning services, arguing that Bank of America failed to adequately investigate payments so unusual that the bank eventually acknowledged they lacked a verifiable business purpose. Wyden's investigators alleged that senior bankers knew Epstein presented serious reputational and compliance risks, yet continued protecting or cultivating the relationship because Epstein himself was lucrative and because he provided access to other extraordinarily wealthy clients.The report portrayed those failures not as isolated mistakes but as a systemic breakdown in which wealth and profitability repeatedly outweighed meaningful compliance. It alleged that JPMorgan executives continued interacting with Epstein even after the bank removed him as a client in 2013, while suspicious activity was not comprehensively reported to federal authorities until after his 2019 arrest. Wyden's staff called for federal investigations of individual bankers at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, as well as Epstein associates Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, and Harry Beller, arguing that individuals involved in moving or overseeing Epstein's money deserved greater scrutiny. The report also emphasized the absence of meaningful accountability, noting that Epstein-related banks, his estate, and Leon Black had collectively paid more than $900 million in settlements and penalties while most bankers identified in the investigation had faced no known regulatory or financial consequences. It further accused several banks of refusing to cooperate voluntarily with Wyden's investigation. In response, Wyden proposed strengthening anti-money-laundering laws by requiring senior officials to personally attest that ultra-high-net-worth accounts had been properly monitored, imposing stronger penalties on bankers who failed to report suspicious activity, requiring enhanced scrutiny of transactions involving high-risk clients, and mandating prompt government notification when banks terminate customers because of suspected criminal or suspicious financial behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Senator Ron Wyden's Senate Finance Committee investigation concluded that major Wall Street institutions repeatedly failed to detect, scrutinize, and promptly report financial activity that helped sustain Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The report focused primarily on JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, alleging significant failures under federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Investigators found that Epstein moved enormous amounts of money through the banking system, including millions in cash withdrawals and thousands of wire transfers, while banks frequently failed to file timely suspicious-activity reports. JPMorgan alone retroactively flagged thousands of transactions worth more than $1 billion years after much of the activity occurred, while Deutsche Bank later identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable transactions. The report also examined roughly $170 million that billionaire Leon Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax and estate-planning services, arguing that Bank of America failed to adequately investigate payments so unusual that the bank eventually acknowledged they lacked a verifiable business purpose. Wyden's investigators alleged that senior bankers knew Epstein presented serious reputational and compliance risks, yet continued protecting or cultivating the relationship because Epstein himself was lucrative and because he provided access to other extraordinarily wealthy clients.The report portrayed those failures not as isolated mistakes but as a systemic breakdown in which wealth and profitability repeatedly outweighed meaningful compliance. It alleged that JPMorgan executives continued interacting with Epstein even after the bank removed him as a client in 2013, while suspicious activity was not comprehensively reported to federal authorities until after his 2019 arrest. Wyden's staff called for federal investigations of individual bankers at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, as well as Epstein associates Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, and Harry Beller, arguing that individuals involved in moving or overseeing Epstein's money deserved greater scrutiny. The report also emphasized the absence of meaningful accountability, noting that Epstein-related banks, his estate, and Leon Black had collectively paid more than $900 million in settlements and penalties while most bankers identified in the investigation had faced no known regulatory or financial consequences. It further accused several banks of refusing to cooperate voluntarily with Wyden's investigation. In response, Wyden proposed strengthening anti-money-laundering laws by requiring senior officials to personally attest that ultra-high-net-worth accounts had been properly monitored, imposing stronger penalties on bankers who failed to report suspicious activity, requiring enhanced scrutiny of transactions involving high-risk clients, and mandating prompt government notification when banks terminate customers because of suspected criminal or suspicious financial behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Senator Ron Wyden's Senate Finance Committee investigation concluded that major Wall Street institutions repeatedly failed to detect, scrutinize, and promptly report financial activity that helped sustain Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The report focused primarily on JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, alleging significant failures under federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Investigators found that Epstein moved enormous amounts of money through the banking system, including millions in cash withdrawals and thousands of wire transfers, while banks frequently failed to file timely suspicious-activity reports. JPMorgan alone retroactively flagged thousands of transactions worth more than $1 billion years after much of the activity occurred, while Deutsche Bank later identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable transactions. The report also examined roughly $170 million that billionaire Leon Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax and estate-planning services, arguing that Bank of America failed to adequately investigate payments so unusual that the bank eventually acknowledged they lacked a verifiable business purpose. Wyden's investigators alleged that senior bankers knew Epstein presented serious reputational and compliance risks, yet continued protecting or cultivating the relationship because Epstein himself was lucrative and because he provided access to other extraordinarily wealthy clients.The report portrayed those failures not as isolated mistakes but as a systemic breakdown in which wealth and profitability repeatedly outweighed meaningful compliance. It alleged that JPMorgan executives continued interacting with Epstein even after the bank removed him as a client in 2013, while suspicious activity was not comprehensively reported to federal authorities until after his 2019 arrest. Wyden's staff called for federal investigations of individual bankers at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, as well as Epstein associates Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, and Harry Beller, arguing that individuals involved in moving or overseeing Epstein's money deserved greater scrutiny. The report also emphasized the absence of meaningful accountability, noting that Epstein-related banks, his estate, and Leon Black had collectively paid more than $900 million in settlements and penalties while most bankers identified in the investigation had faced no known regulatory or financial consequences. It further accused several banks of refusing to cooperate voluntarily with Wyden's investigation. In response, Wyden proposed strengthening anti-money-laundering laws by requiring senior officials to personally attest that ultra-high-net-worth accounts had been properly monitored, imposing stronger penalties on bankers who failed to report suspicious activity, requiring enhanced scrutiny of transactions involving high-risk clients, and mandating prompt government notification when banks terminate customers because of suspected criminal or suspicious financial behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Michael Saylor and Phong Le sat down with Natalie Brunell to take questions directly from Strategy investors — including some pointed concerns about MSTR's sharp drawdown, dilution and whether common shareholders are still the company's top priority. One investor said he put $73,000 into MSTR for each of his three children, only to see each investment fall to roughly $20,000. He asked Saylor and Le directly: have common shareholders become Strategy's lowest priority? In this episode: Michael and Phong address dilution fears around $MSTR common stock  Are $MSTR buybacks are on the table, and under what conditions? What they say they learned from the $STRC drawdown Whether the $1 million and $10 million per Bitcoin scenarios still hold Why Strategy wants to become the "J.P. Morgan of digital assets" and what that really means ---- Order Natalie's new book "Bitcoin is For Everyone," a simple introduction to Bitcoin and what's broken in our current financial system: https://amzn.to/3WzFzfU  ---- Borrow against your Bitcoin without selling it. Ledn offers Bitcoin-backed loans built for serious holders, with rates that get lower as your loan size increases. With Ledn's custodied loan product, your Bitcoin is held in custody and not lent out. Ledn has operated through multiple market cycles without a loss of client assets and publishes Proof of Reserves so you can verify what they hold. Get 0.25% off your first loan at ledn.io/natalie. Terms apply — see the site for details. ---- Bitdeer Technologies Group (NASDAQ: BTDR) powers AI and Bitcoin mining infrastructure with 3 GW of secured global energy — and owns the entire stack, from equipment manufacturing to data centers to proprietary orchestration software. Learn more at https://www.bitdeer.com. ---- Kalshi is the largest prediction market in the world. Get $25 when you trade $25. http://kalshi.com/r/HODL ---- Natalie's Bitcoin Product Partners: Speed is my go-to Bitcoin Lightning wallet! Send, receive, or swap stablecoins and digital gold into Bitcoin in one app. Run a business? Speed powers Bitcoin payments for Steak 'n Shake, and it can do the same for you. Download at https://speed.app/natalie  and use code COINSTORIES10 for 5,000 free sats after your first transaction. Download Bitkey Today and use my promo code STORIES to get 10% off the new Bitkey. This episode has been sponsored by Bitkey: https://bitkey.world/STORIES Master Bitcoin self-custody and gain peace of mind with 1-on-1 training: https://www.thebitcoinway.com/natalie?utm_source=partner-natalie&utm_medium=podcast With BitcoinIRA, you can invest in bitcoin 24/7 inside a tax-advantaged IRA. Choose a Traditional IRA to defer taxes, or a Roth IRA for tax-free withdrawals later. Take control of your future with BitcoinIRA: https://www.bitcoinira.com/natalie  Natalie's Upcoming Events: The best time to plan for Bitcoin 2027 is right now. Early bird tickets are live — grab the lowest pricing available and use code HODL for 10% off: https://tickets.b.tc/event/bitcoin-2027?promoCodeTask=apply&promoCodeInput=HODL  Extra Services to Consider: One of the best decisions I made for both my heath and my bank account was joining CrowdHealth years ago. I never spend more than $200 on health coverage through my CrowdHealth plan and all my health events have been crowd-funded. Get started with a discounted plan at my link. : www.joincrowdhealth.com/natalie  ---- Disclaimer: The News Block and Coin Stories are for educational and entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Natalie Brunell is not a financial advisor. Some content may include sponsorships or paid partnerships, which are disclosed. Always do your own research and consult a licensed professional before making financial decisions. Bitcoin and digital assets are volatile — never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Senator Ron Wyden's Senate Finance Committee investigation concluded that major Wall Street institutions repeatedly failed to detect, scrutinize, and promptly report financial activity that helped sustain Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The report focused primarily on JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, alleging significant failures under federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Investigators found that Epstein moved enormous amounts of money through the banking system, including millions in cash withdrawals and thousands of wire transfers, while banks frequently failed to file timely suspicious-activity reports. JPMorgan alone retroactively flagged thousands of transactions worth more than $1 billion years after much of the activity occurred, while Deutsche Bank later identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable transactions. The report also examined roughly $170 million that billionaire Leon Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax and estate-planning services, arguing that Bank of America failed to adequately investigate payments so unusual that the bank eventually acknowledged they lacked a verifiable business purpose. Wyden's investigators alleged that senior bankers knew Epstein presented serious reputational and compliance risks, yet continued protecting or cultivating the relationship because Epstein himself was lucrative and because he provided access to other extraordinarily wealthy clients.The report portrayed those failures not as isolated mistakes but as a systemic breakdown in which wealth and profitability repeatedly outweighed meaningful compliance. It alleged that JPMorgan executives continued interacting with Epstein even after the bank removed him as a client in 2013, while suspicious activity was not comprehensively reported to federal authorities until after his 2019 arrest. Wyden's staff called for federal investigations of individual bankers at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, as well as Epstein associates Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, and Harry Beller, arguing that individuals involved in moving or overseeing Epstein's money deserved greater scrutiny. The report also emphasized the absence of meaningful accountability, noting that Epstein-related banks, his estate, and Leon Black had collectively paid more than $900 million in settlements and penalties while most bankers identified in the investigation had faced no known regulatory or financial consequences. It further accused several banks of refusing to cooperate voluntarily with Wyden's investigation. In response, Wyden proposed strengthening anti-money-laundering laws by requiring senior officials to personally attest that ultra-high-net-worth accounts had been properly monitored, imposing stronger penalties on bankers who failed to report suspicious activity, requiring enhanced scrutiny of transactions involving high-risk clients, and mandating prompt government notification when banks terminate customers because of suspected criminal or suspicious financial behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Senator Ron Wyden's Senate Finance Committee investigation concluded that major Wall Street institutions repeatedly failed to detect, scrutinize, and promptly report financial activity that helped sustain Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The report focused primarily on JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, alleging significant failures under federal anti-money-laundering requirements. Investigators found that Epstein moved enormous amounts of money through the banking system, including millions in cash withdrawals and thousands of wire transfers, while banks frequently failed to file timely suspicious-activity reports. JPMorgan alone retroactively flagged thousands of transactions worth more than $1 billion years after much of the activity occurred, while Deutsche Bank later identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable transactions. The report also examined roughly $170 million that billionaire Leon Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax and estate-planning services, arguing that Bank of America failed to adequately investigate payments so unusual that the bank eventually acknowledged they lacked a verifiable business purpose. Wyden's investigators alleged that senior bankers knew Epstein presented serious reputational and compliance risks, yet continued protecting or cultivating the relationship because Epstein himself was lucrative and because he provided access to other extraordinarily wealthy clients.The report portrayed those failures not as isolated mistakes but as a systemic breakdown in which wealth and profitability repeatedly outweighed meaningful compliance. It alleged that JPMorgan executives continued interacting with Epstein even after the bank removed him as a client in 2013, while suspicious activity was not comprehensively reported to federal authorities until after his 2019 arrest. Wyden's staff called for federal investigations of individual bankers at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, as well as Epstein associates Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, and Harry Beller, arguing that individuals involved in moving or overseeing Epstein's money deserved greater scrutiny. The report also emphasized the absence of meaningful accountability, noting that Epstein-related banks, his estate, and Leon Black had collectively paid more than $900 million in settlements and penalties while most bankers identified in the investigation had faced no known regulatory or financial consequences. It further accused several banks of refusing to cooperate voluntarily with Wyden's investigation. In response, Wyden proposed strengthening anti-money-laundering laws by requiring senior officials to personally attest that ultra-high-net-worth accounts had been properly monitored, imposing stronger penalties on bankers who failed to report suspicious activity, requiring enhanced scrutiny of transactions involving high-risk clients, and mandating prompt government notification when banks terminate customers because of suspected criminal or suspicious financial behavior.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

On this episode of CoinDesk's Public Keys from the New York Stock Exchange, host Jennifer Sanasie is joined by Citizens' Devin Ryan to break down Securitize's first earnings report, its 26% selloff, and why he sees significant upside as tokenization grows. Pantera Capital General Partner Cosmo Jiang explains why AI and blockchain are converging, Solana's lead in AI agent activity, and the new S&P Pantera Digital Asset Index. Plus, a look at Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF flows and Robinhood's new fund giving retail investors access to early-stage Y Combinator startups. - Learn more at bullish.com. - Register now for CoinDesk's Policy and Regulation event on September 22, 2026: policy-regulation.coindesk.com. - To get market moving news delivered daily, download CoinDesk's mobile app: linktr.ee/coindeskapp. - Chapters/Timecodes: 00:00 Welcome to Public Keys 00:29 Securitize Stumbles in First Public Earnings Report 00:50 Citizens' Devin Ryan Joins Public Keys 02:07 From Speculation to Real Blockchain Usage 03:52 Securitize's 26% Selloff and a $15 Price Target 05:29 The Bull and Bear Case for SECZ 06:47 Will the SEC and CFTC Fill the Regulatory Gap? 09:58 What to Watch: BlackRock and Tokenized AUM 12:18 Bitcoin ETFs Post $390M in Weekly Outflows 12:46 13F Filings: Harvard Holds, JPMorgan and Tudor Add 13:06 Ethereum ETFs Snap Five-Week Inflow Streak 13:42 Pantera's Cosmo Jiang on the Market Outlook 16:59 Bitcoin's 42% Discount vs. AI Stocks' Premium 18:26 Blockchain and the Agentic Economy 20:17 Why Solana Leads on AI Agent Activity 21:15 Inside the S&P Pantera Digital Asset Index 25:07 Robinhood Ventures Fund II Debuts on NYSE 26:03 The Risk and Reward of Early-Stage Investing 28:32 How Daily Liquidity for Private Assets Works 30:38 Robinhood Chain, Tokenization and Yield 32:48 Crypto Fear & Greed Index at 31

Private credit is under strain as troubled loans swell, JPMorgan boss Jamie Dimon warned Britain's chancellor against higher bank taxes, and the cost of shipping through many global maritime chokepoints are hitting record highs. Plus, the US is sitting on a mountain of debt – can anyone fix it? Mentioned in this podcast:Private credit under strain as troubled loans swellJamie Dimon warns UK chancellor against higher bank taxesWar and climate change drive surge in cost of shipping through global chokepointsUS sells 30-year bonds at highest borrowing costs since 2001How Ralph Lauren won the workwear wars as America returned to the officeThe mother of all professional wardrobes Style war: inside Wall Street's battle to revive J Crew Want to get in touch? Email us at podcasts@ft.comNote: The FT does not use generative AI to voice its podcasts The FT News Briefing is produced by Victoria Craig, Sonja Hutson, Saffeya Ahmed, and Katya Kumkova. Our editor is Marc Filippino. Our show is mixed by Sam Giovinco and Alex Higgins. Additional help from Gavin Kallmann, Michael Lello, Peter Barber and David da Silva. Our executive producer is Topher Forhecz. Flo Phillips is the FT's global head of audio. The show's theme music is by Metaphor Music. Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Olivia Fox Cabane is the best-selling author of The Charisma Myth and a former director of innovative leadership at Stanford. She has coached leaders at companies including Apple, Google, JPMorgan, and Airbnb, and has spent years studying the science behind charisma. In this episode, Olivia explains why charisma isn't an innate personality trait but a learnable skill, how presence, power, and warmth work together, and why mastering charisma may become even more valuable as AI makes knowledge and information increasingly accessible. On this episode we talk about: Why charisma is a learned behavior rather than an innate personality trait The three core components of charisma: presence, power, and warmth How to practice charisma in low-stakes situations and make presence a daily habit The potential downsides of charisma, including manipulation, envy, and convincing people when you're actually wrong How vocal fluctuation, online communication, and AI are changing the way charisma is perceived Top 3 Takeaways Charisma can be learned. Like any other skill, charisma may feel unnatural at first, but consistent practice can make it feel effortless over time. Start with presence. In a distracted world, simply giving someone your full attention can dramatically increase your impact. Olivia recommends practicing in everyday, low-stakes interactions. Use charisma with the right intent. Charisma can be incredibly powerful, but it can also manipulate or mislead people. The goal should be to create a better experience for everyone involved, not simply to control an interaction. Notable Quotes “Charisma is a series of learned behaviors.” “The world becomes your lab and every person you meet is a chance to experiment.” “If your intent is good and your impact is good, use everything at your disposal.” Connect with Olivia Fox Cabane: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oliviafoxcabane/ Other: The Charisma Myth  Website: https://www.oliviafoxcabane.com/ A Word from Our Sponsors: - Go to Leesa.com for 25% OFF select mattresses (through August 23, 2026) PLUS get an extra $50 off with promo code TMM, exclusive for my listeners  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jordi Visser is a veteran macro investor with 30+ years of experience and the author of the VisserLabs Substack. In this conversation, we break down why the AI trade already bottomed, how bitcoin fits into the future of markets, and why companies like Figure Technologies are outgrowing legacy banks like JPMorgan. We also discuss inflation, the AI IPO wave with Anthropic and OpenAI, and how AI is reshaping everyday life — from raising kids to running a household.====================Arch Public is an agentic trading platform that automates investment strategies across Stocks, Commodities, ETFs and Crypto. Whether you're rotating into AI & Gold, allocating to the S&P 500, or accumulating Bitcoin, Arch Public executes your plan 24/7 without ever taking custody of your assets or funds. Sign up today at https://www.archpublic.com, and start your FREE automated trading strategy! ====================GalaxyOne is a financial technology platform built for people who want their cash working harder. Open an account with promo code POMP and deposit $10,000 to earn a $3,000 bonus. See site for promotion details → https://go.galaxy.app/HMiq/p57n69yy Galaxy Premium Yield is an investment note issued by Galaxy Digital LP and guaranteed by Galaxy Digital Holdings LP. It is not a bank deposit, is unsecured, and is not FDIC or SIPC insured. U.S. accredited investors only. Cash deposits held at Cross River Bank, Member FDIC. Securities products are not FDIC insured, not bank guaranteed, and may lose value. GalaxyOne Crypto is not FDIC or SIPC insured. Terms apply.====================0:00 - Intro0:50- Why stocks keep climbing despite AI fears2:41 - Jordy's AI portfolio & calling market bottoms7:05 - Inflation report & the Bayesian mindset11:27 - Figure Technologies & the tokenization boom19:47 - Why JPMorgan and legacy banks are at risk24:18 - Bitcoin is the "S&P 500 of ten years from now"26:14 - Anthropic, OpenAI & the AI IPO wave31:25 - AI goes mainstream: his wife & raising kids in the AI era42:43 - ICE deportations & the inflation debate47:47 - Politics, protests & the AI data center fight55:50 - Jordi's weekly videos & how you can help him

A.M. Edition for Aug. 12. Centrist David Crowley scores an electoral upset in Wisconsin, narrowly defeating Democratic socialist Francesca Hong in a race to secure the Democratic nomination for governor. WSJ's Damian Paletta says Crowley's victory could mark a turning point for progressives. Plus, New York City launches a sweeping investigation into four prediction markets – probing Polymarket, Kalshi, Coinbase and Gemini Titan for alleged deceptive marketing practices and the targeting of minors. And could one of Hollywood's oldest studios be relocating from Tinseltown to Music City? Luke Vargas hosts. Sign up for the WSJ's free What's News newsletter. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.