Podcast appearances and mentions of mark zukerberg

Com Renan Santos

Hour 1 for 8/28/24 Drew covered the latest news of the day (:21). Then, Fr. Mark Salas (19:49) discussed a tour of Fr. Michael McGivney's relics in Texas. Finally, James Hirsen broke down Mark Zukerberg's censorship and free speech (28:25). One caller thinks the election will have a big impact on this (45:21).

Theo thống kê từ tạp chí kinh tế Forbes của Mỹ, năm 2024 được coi là năm kỷ lục về số lượng tỷ phú đô la với 2781 tỷ phú trên toàn thế giới, cao hơn 141 người so với năm ngoái. Và họ cũng đang trở nên giàu có hơn bao giờ hết. Tổng tài sản của họ còn cao hơn GDP của cả một đất nước và tầm ảnh hưởng của họ có khi còn lớn hơn cả chính phủ.  Họ là ai? Phải chăng "miệng của kẻ có tiền như có gang có thép?" Tại sao nói họ còn quyền lực hơn cả chính phủ? Quyền lực của họ liệu có phải chỉ đến từ số tài sản kếch xù mà họ sở hữu?Qua so sánh tài sản của các tỷ phú thế giới mà tạp chí Forbes công bố với số liệu từ Quỹ tiền tệ Quốc tế IMF cùng thời điểm, ta có thể thấy nhiều người trong số họ còn sở hữu tổng tài sản cao hơn tổng sản phẩm quốc nội của nhiều nước. Chẳng hạn như Bernard Arnault (ông chủ tập đoàn LVMH, sở hữu nhiều nhãn hiệu thời trang và làm đẹp xa xỉ bậc nhất thế giới như Louis Vuitton, Dior, Celine, v.v) có tổng tài sản cao hơn GDP năm 2023 của Qatar. Elon Musk, (nhà sáng lập hãng xe điện Tesla và tập đoàn công nghệ không gian SpaceX) với tổng tài sản cao hơn GDP của Hungary. Hay Mark Zukerberg với tài sản cao hơn GDP của Slovakia cùng thời điểm đó.Không phải "đại gia" nào cũng nắm trong tay quyền lực đủ để ảnh hưởng đến cả thế giới. Đa số những người này chỉ đơn giản là các chủ doanh nghiệp và đương nhiên họ vẫn có quyền lực, chẳng hạn như quyết định đặt công xưởng ở một nước, giúp tạo ra công ăn việc làm cho vài ngàn người ở nước đó hay tác động đến một dự luật về thuế quan mà họ cho rằng có thể gây bất lợi đến việc kinh doanh của mình. Tuy nhiên, có không ít tỷ phú có "thế lực", đủ khả năng tác động đến trật tự thế giới, áp đặt mô hình xã hội của họ lên nhân loại mà không cần nghe theo ý kiến của các chính phủ.Vì sao họ lại ham muốn quyền lực đến vậy?Trả lời RFI Pháp ngữ, bà Christine Kerdellant, tác giả cuốn sách “Ces milliardaires plus forts que les États” (Tạm dịch : Những tỷ phú quyền lực hơn Nhà nước) người đã từng thực hiện nhiều nghiên cứu về giới tài phiệt trên thế giới sẽ lý giải cho chúng ta nguyên nhân vì sao các tỷ phú này lại ham muốn quyền lực đến vậy :“Họ cho rằng các chính phủ không đủ khả năng để lãnh đạo thế giới hay tạo ra các bước tiến cho nhân loại. Thay vào đó, giới cầm quyền chỉ dành thời gian để thu thuế hay áp đặt mọi việc. Những tỷ phú này tin rằng chính họ mới đủ khả năng điều hành, thúc đẩy các hoạt động nghiên cứu trên mọi lĩnh vực.”Ngoài ra theo bà Christine Kerdellant, tâm lý muốn kiểm soát quyền lực của họ cũng có thể bắt nguồn từ những biến cố gia đình thưở thiếu thời :“Trong cuốn sách được xuất bản trước đó, tôi đã tìm hiểu về nhiều chủ doanh nghiệp lớn tại Pháp trong những năm 1980. Đa số họ đều mất cha từ nhỏ. Vì vậy họ bắt buộc phải trở thành người đàn ông của gia đình để gánh vác mọi chuyện cùng với mẹ. Dần dần, ham muốn quyền lực, nhu cầu được kiểm soát và thúc đẩy mọi chuyện của họ ngày càng lớn hơn so với những người khác.”Vậy những vị tỷ phú này là ai?Elon Musk kiểm soát bầu trờiQuay trở lại thời điểm tháng 02/2022 khi Nga bắt đầu xâm lược Ukraina, Elon Musk đã cung cấp dịch vụ Internet cho Ukraina thông qua các vệ tinh Starlink mà công ty SpaceX của ông phóng lên. Kể từ đó, khoàng 20.000 thiết bị đầu cuối (terminal) đã được triển khai ở Ukraina cho phép người dân và quân đội nước này truy cập Internet đáng tin cậy và ít bị ảnh hưởng bởi các cuộc tấn công và gây nhiễu của Nga. Theo tờ Washington Post, Starlink thể hiện ưu thế vượt trội hơn hẳn so với các dịch vụ Internet mặt đất truyền thống và bởi vậy nó đã nhanh chóng trở thành một phần thiết yếu trong hệ thống quân sự của Kiev, giúp binh lính điều khiển drone trong thời gian thực, xác định mục tiêu cho hoả lực pháo binh hoặc đơn giản là liên lạc với gia đình. Thậm chí một sỹ quan chỉ huy của lực lượng Ukraina còn từng nhận định : “Chiến đấu mà không có Starlink ở tiền tuyến giống như ra trận mà không có vũ khí.”Tuy nhiên chỉ vài tháng sau đó, Musk bất ngờ tuyên bố trên mạng xã hội Twitter (sau này là mạng X) rằng ông “không thể tiếp tục tài trợ vô thời hạn cho hệ thống này”. Theo tờ Courrier International, quyết định này được đưa ra chỉ vài ngày sau khi Ukraina từ chối “kế hoạch hoà bình” mà Elon Musk đề xuất nhằm chấm dứt chiến tranh ở Ukraina. Theo đó, vị tỷ phú đề nghị Ukraina từ bỏ bán đảo Crimée và cam kết giữ thái độ trung lập với Nga và phương Tây.Ông Olivier Lascar, tổng biên tập bộ phận kỹ thuật số của tạp chí Khoa học và Tương lai (Sciences et Avenir), trong cuộc phỏng vấn trên kênh Sénat Public bày tỏ lo ngại khi giờ đây “một cá nhân, một ông chủ dù không được người dân bầu ra nhưng vẫn có thể tác động, thay đổi cục diện của cả một cuộc chiến.”Ngoài ra Elon Musk còn thừa nhận trong cuốn tự truyện của mình rằng ông từng bí mật ngắt kết nối mạng Starlink để ngăn drone của Ukraina tấn công một hạm đội của quân Nga :“Khi quân đội Ukraina muốn tấn công một căn cứ hải quân của Nga ở bán đảo Crimée, Elon Musk đã có cuộc điện đàm với một nhân vật thân thích với Putin. Người này đã cảnh báo Elon Musk rằng nếu Ukraina tập kích lần này, Matxcơva sẽ đáp trả bằng vũ khí hạt nhân. Elon Musk nói rằng ông ta cảm thấy sợ hãi và bởi vậy đã ngăn Ukraina truy cập Internet vì ông không muốn phải  trách nhiệm về một thảm hoạ như Hiroshima.”Bill Gates nắm giữ sức khoẻ thế giớiVào năm 2000, tỷ phú Bill Gates và vợ đã quyết định thành lập quỹ từ thiện Bill and Melinda Gates (BMGF) với mục đích cải thiện hệ thống y tế, giáo dục, xoá đói giảm nghèo trên thế giới. Từ lâu quỹ Gates đã là một trong những tổ chức phi chính phủ quyền lực nhất hành tinh với nguồn vốn hỗ trợ lên tới 46,8 tỷ đô la tính đến năm 2018. Con số này thậm chí còn cao hơn GDP của Côte d'Ivoire (Bờ Biển Ngà) hay Jordanie vào cùng thời điểm. Nếu quỹ Gates là một Nhà nước thì đây sẽ là quốc gia giàu thứ 91 trên thế giới, theo xếp hạng của Ngân hàng Thế giới (WB).Quỹ Gates cũng là nhà tài trợ lớn cho các cơ quan Liên Hiệp Quốc phụ trách các vấn đề sức khoẻ, đặc biệt là cho Tổ chức Y tế Thế giới (WHO). Theo số liệu năm 2020-2021 trên trang web chính thức của WHO, quỹ Bill and Melinda Gates là nhà tài trợ lớn thứ hai thế giới, chỉ sau Đức, với số tiền lên tới 751 triệu đô la. Là nhà tài trợ lớn, đương nhiên ảnh hưởng của Bill Gates đến tổ chức này cũng không nhỏ. Politico trích lời đại diện một tổ chức phi chính phủ có trụ sở ở Geneve, Thuỵ Sĩ, cho biết “Ở WHO, ông ấy được đối xử như một nguyên thủ quốc gia.” Phân tích về tầm ảnh hưởng của quỹ Gates, bà Stéphanie Tchiombiano, giảng viên khoa khoa học chính trị tại đại học Panthéon Sorbonne Paris cho biết :“Quỹ Gates có thể ảnh hưởng đến các chính sách y tế thế giới thông qua nhiều kênh như : hiện diện trong các hệ thống quản lý y tế toàn cầu, là một thành viên trong nhóm không chính thức H8 (Health 8) quy tụ các nhà lãnh đạo thế giới về y tế. (…) Nhiều người còn lo ngại rằng các quyết định của WHO đều phải đợi quỹ Gates phê duyệt thì mới được thông qua.”Còn theo tờ Politico, có người thậm chí đã chỉ trích rằng ưu tiên của Bill Gates giờ đây đã trở thành ưu tiên của WHO. Theo quan điểm của họ, thay vì tập trung vào việc nâng cao hệ thống chăm sóc y tế lâm sàng ở một số nước kém phát triển để ngăn chặn các đại dịch có thể bùng phát trong tương lai hay các loại bệnh thông thường khác thì WHO lại chi một nguồn lực quá lớn cho các dự án chống lại một số loại bệnh đặc biệt mà Gates ưu tiên như sốt rét hay bại liệt. Những người chỉ trích cho rằng các tổ chức y tế cũng như quỹ Gates đã quá đề cao quan điểm cá nhân của chủ tịch Microsoft thay vì nghiên cứu, đánh giá tình hình thực tế.Và hậu quả là gì? Theo điều tra của tờ Los Angeles Times, trước khi quỹ Gates xuất hiện, nhiều nước châu Phi vốn đã phải đối mặt với tình trạng thiếu bác sĩ trầm trọng. Sau đó Gates đến và “đổ phần lớn đóng góp vào cuộc chiến chống một số loại bệnh cụ thể như bại liệt hay AIDS, làm tăng nhu cầu đào tạo chữa trị các loại bệnh này và các bác sĩ chuyên về những bệnh này cũng được trả lương cao hơn”, gây ra tình trạng chảy máu chất xám. Số lượng bác sĩ đa khoa vốn đã ít ỏi nay lại chuyển sang các lĩnh vực chuyên khoa này khiến cho người dân tại các nước châu Phi cận Sahara ngày càng khó tiếp cận với các dịch vụ chăm sóc cơ bản.Ngoài ra, cũng có nhiều đồn đoán xung quanh quỹ Gates, như quỹ được thành lập ra để giúp các tỷ phú trốn thuế hay rửa tiền thông qua các hoạt động từ thiện. Tuy nhiên vẫn chưa có chứng cứ xác thực nào được đưa ra để chứng minh cho những lời đồn này. Bên cạnh đó cũng có nhiều người cho rằng : “Tôi không nghĩ là họ có ý đồ xấu. Họ chỉ đơn giản là những người chơi lớn, đến mức mà nếu họ rút tiền ra thì cuộc chơi sẽ kết thúc”, Politico dẫn lời một nhà ngoại giao giấu tên.Mark Zukerberg thống trị truyền thôngSáng đăng tải một dòng trạng thái lên Facebook, trưa chia sẻ một hình ảnh lên Instragram, chiều gửi một tin nhắn qua Messenger và tối gọi một cuộc điện thoại qua Whatsapp, một ngày làm việc bình thường của người trẻ hiện nay. Trong thời đại công nghệ số, thật không dễ để tìm được một người không dùng đến bất cứ mạng xã hội nào trong số này. Và cả bốn nền tảng trên đều thuộc tập đoàn Meta, một trong những công ty công nghệ lớn nhất thế giới do Mark Zukerberg sáng lập.Theo báo cáo tài chính quý 2/2023 của Meta, số lượng người dùng hoạt động hàng tháng trên toàn bộ hệ sinh thái Meta rơi vào khoảng 3,88 tỷ người, một con số khổng lồ. Nắm trong tay dữ liệu của một phần ba dân số thế giới, ông chủ Facebook hiển nhiên có khả năng gây ảnh hưởng rất lớn.Theo bà Christine Kerdellant, “Mark Zukerberg có thể tác động đến cuộc tổng tuyển cử ở Mỹ. Trước đó, Mark Zukerberg đã từng cho phép một trường đại học tiếp cận với cơ sở dữ liệu của Facebook với mục đích ban đầu nhằm thực hiện một cuộc khảo sát. Tuy nhiên sau đó, trường đại học này đã bán những dữ liệu được cung cấp cho một công ty làm việc cho cơ quan vận động tranh cử của Donald Trump và cho cả một số chính khách của Anh Quốc, những người theo chủ nghĩa Brexit (đưa nước Anh ra khỏi Liên Hiệp Châu Âu). Những người trả lời khảo sát, khoảng gần một triệu người, cho biết họ đã nhận được những tin nhắn, quảng cáo được cá nhân hoá gây ảnh hưởng đến lá phiếu của họ. Đa số những tin nhắn này đưa ra những nhận định tích cực về Trump và tiêu cực về Hilary Clinton.”Không chỉ thay đổi được lá phiếu của các cử tri, các nền tảng mạng xã hội của Mark Zukerberg còn có thể thay đổi cả quan điểm thẩm mỹ của người dùng :“Theo số liệu từ Viện thẩm mỹ Champs Élysées ở Paris, Pháp, số lượng người trẻ từ 15-25 tuổi đến yêu cầu phẫu thuật thẩm mỹ đã tăng lên gấp 10 lần. Họ muốn phẫu thuật vì họ đã quen với những hình ảnh của bản thân trên những filter (công nghệ chỉnh sửa hình ảnh) có sẵn trên Facebook hay Instagram. Thường xuyên nhìn vào khuôn mặt của mình thông qua những filter làm đẹp này, họ thấy bản thân trẻ hơn, đẹp hơn, không còn những khuyết điểm, các bộ phận như mắt, mũi, lông mày, v.v đều được chỉnh sửa lại. Và sau đó những người trẻ này đến các viện thẩm mỹ để yêu cầu chỉnh sửa lại mặt mình cho giống với những hình ảnh trên các filter kia.”Chấp nhận đau đớn và tốn kém, nhiều người trẻ giờ từ chối khuôn mặt thật để đeo lên lớp mặt nạ giả, chạy theo một thế giới ảo mà các nền tảng mạng xã hội tạo ra. Và ông chủ Meta, thay vì có những biện pháp để ngăn ngừa hay cảnh báo, trước khi người trẻ, đặc biệt là trẻ em, sa lầy trong thế giới ảo đó, thì lại biến nó ngày càng trở nên cuốn hút hơn, gây nghiện hơn, miễn sao có thể giữ chân họ ở lại càng lâu càng tốt để tiện cho việc quảng cáo.Vậy các chính phủ có thể làm gì để hạn chế quyền lực của những tỷ phú này?Bà Christine Kerdellant nhận định : “Ta có hai cách. Cách đầu tiên là làm như chính quyền Trung Quốc. Cách của họ là ngăn chặn các doanh nghiệp Mỹ phát triển ở Trung Quốc, thay vào đó là khuyến khích các doanh nghiệp trong nước, tạo thế cân bằng giữa các tỷ phú Trung Quốc với Mỹ. Rồi đến một ngày, khi các doanh nghiệp này đã lớn mạnh và có đủ khả năng đe doạ đến quyền hành của chính phủ Trung Quốc trong một số lĩnh vực, cây gậy bấy giờ mới bắt đầu được giáng xuống. Chẳng hạn như Jack Ma, vị tỷ phú ngày càng giàu có và quyền lực, ông chủ của tập đoàn thương mại điện tử Alibaba với vị thế ngang ngửa Amazon, chỉ sau một lần chỉ trích hệ thống tài chính của Trung Quốc khiến các doanh nghiệp thụt lùi mà đã phải trả giá đắt. Trung Quốc và Tập Cận Bình sau đó đã quyết định phải “quản lý” lại các chủ doanh nghiệp. Jack Ma đã bị giam giữ trong ba tháng và chịu cảnh « tra tấn trắng ». Ông không bị nhốt trong một nhà tù mà là một khách sạn, nơi mà ánh đèn trắng được bật suốt cả ngày để tra tấn tinh thần. Sau đó, họ thuyết phục Jack Ma rằng ông ta phải từ bỏ tập đoàn của mình vì lợi ích của nước Trung Quốc, ông ta phải để cho chính phủ can thiệp vào việc kinh doanh của Alibaba. Sau khi Jack Ma bị bắt, tập đoàn của ông đã mất ba phần tư giá trị thương mại và bản thân ông cũng chỉ còn nắm giữ 8% cố phần của tập đoàn này. Và sau đó, chế độ Tập Cận Bình đã làm tương tự với các công ty khác thuộc BATX (các công ty công nghệ hàng đầu của Trung Quốc bao gồm : Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent và Xiaomi). 60 tỷ phú trong số 600 tỷ phú Trung Quốc đã biến mất, trong đó có nhiều người đã phải rời bỏ quê hương, nhiều người khác thì bị bắt hoặc bị yêu cầu phải bỏ lại quyền lợi của mình ở các tập đoàn mà chính mình đã lập ra.Cách thứ hai là làm như châu Âu, vốn không thể thực hiện các biện pháp như Trung Quốc. Họ cố gắng mua lại 900 công ty, tức là muốn diệt từ trong trứng việc cạnh tranh và hưởng lợi từ những gì mà các công ty này tạo ra. Ngoài ra còn các biện pháp về thuế quan, như áp 15% mức thuế tối thiểu toàn cầu với các công ty đa quốc gia, v.v”   Thật khó có thể phủ nhận tài năng cũng như những đóng góp của các vị tỷ phú này cho xã hội. Họ thúc đẩy nền kinh tế, cải thiện đời sống và tạo ra các bước tiến cho nhân loại. Cảm ơn và thậm chí là biết ơn họ, đương nhiên. Nhưng phải chăng vì vậy mà người dân và các chính phủ - đại diện của người dân – chấp nhận trở thành quân tốt trên bàn cờ của các tỷ phú? 

No Cease Fire in Israel. Biden said it was going to happen, but when is Biden right? This isn't about Israel, this is about you. Oppenheimer wins big at the Oscars last night. The Zone of Interest winner makes unusual statement during acceptance speech. Lara Trump is now co-Chair of the RNC. Hope they never ask me for money. If it's all about Trump, there is no future. Port being built to provide aid to Gaza and Hamas. Should Tony be commenting about the Oscars? We should not dismiss culture. Angela Brown here in Indianapolis is a mad talent. Charlie Parker's Yardbird. Huntington Beach says only the American flag in government buildings. And rightfully so. Rare things: Gun Shop Robbed. Indiana moves forward on legislation preventing foreign owners of Hoosier land. Biden goaded into mentioning Lanken Riley at the SOTU. Laken Riley's mother has words for President Biden. Biden is apologizing for saying "illegal" about Laken Riley's murderer  is our Popcorn Moment. Trey Galloway caps emotional Senior Day with announcement on future. It's Meatless Monday. Indiana student reprimanded for having an American Flag on their car. What's wrong with these principals. The American flag always has a place. Kara Swisher calls Trump a racist, facist, and rapist. Nancy Mace spars with George Stephanopoulos. Democrat Economist Gary Cohn: Consumers ‘Completely Right' To Be Angry Over Biden Inflation. No cease fire with Gaza. U.S. building a port in Gaza to supply Hamas. Fill up on the News. Haiti is falling apart again. Is the feared gang boss ‘Barbecue' now the most powerful man in Haiti? Maria Bartiromo: Trump doesn't want to ban Tik Tok because it makes Facebook and Mark Zukerberg stronger. DEI is a scam. And the pay is incredible!  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Come gestiscono lo stress e il proprio tempo i grandi imprenditori del nostro tempo? Vediamo come Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Mark Zukerberg e Jeff Bezos ricaricano le proprie batterie emotive e riescono a dare sempre il meglio al lavoro.AI REVOLUTION si terrà in webinar 23 febbraio 2024 (h.14:00 - 18:00) Il seminario è aperto all'intero studio professionale, per permettere a tutti i componenti dello studio di crescere in questa transizione culturale. Pertanto, con una sola quota di iscrizione è possibile far partecipare tutti i componenti dello studio (professionisti e collaboratori). Ci sono ancora posti disponibili, approfittane ora! https://myp.srl/intelligenza-artificiale-studi-professionali/********Mario Alberto Catarozzo - Formatore e Business Coach professionista• https://mariocatarozzo.it | https://myp.srl• FACEBOOK: https://facebook.com/MarAlbCat• LINKEDIN: https://it.linkedin.com/in/macatarozzo• TWITTER: https://twitter.com/MarAlbCat• INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/mariocatarozzo• TELEGRAM: http://t.me/COACHMAC_official• BUONGIORNO FELICITÀ: https://www.facebook.com/groups/buongiornofelicita• GIOVEDÌ IN DIRETTA:https://myp.srl/webinar/

En entrevista para MVS Noticias con Manuel López San Martín, Emilio Saldaña ‘Pizu', experto en tecnología, habló de que Mark Zuckerberg, CEO de Meta, tuvo que comparecer ante el Congreso de EU para disculparse por el daño que han causado las redes sociales.   "La discusión estuvo centrada en los esfuerzos para mejorar la seguridad y proteger a los jóvenes en sus plataformas", explicó.  El especialista en tecnología destaca que tras lo ocurrido con los CEO de Meta, TikTok, Snapchat y Disscord, será necesario contar con una regulación externa para determinar que está bien, en particular de la privacidad y seguridad de las infancias.  "El conflicto se da entre el poco control que los padres tienen para que sus hijos utilicen estas plataformas, no obstante no cumplan con la edad mínima, por ejemplo Instagram la edad mínima es de 13 años y sabemos, las mismas plataformas lo saben que desde mucho antes los niños y niñas comienzan a utilizarlas...", dijo.  Para terminar Emilio Saldaña ´Pizu' aseguró que este conflicto podría abrir las puertas a una regulación más estricta en el uso de redes sociales, en especial para los menores.  "Estamos ante el ingreso de una regulación más estricta en redes sociales, desde un externo gubernamental, particularmente para niños y niñas. El primer huequito a través del cual el gobierno podría comenzar a regular las redes sociales", concluyó.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

La Reforma Eléctrica de AMLO es un ejemplo más de lo que ha hecho Morena este sexenio: Ezra Shabot. Las disculpas de Mark Zukerberg podrían permitir una regulación más estricta en redes sociales. Elecciones 2024 tú decides: Juam Manuel Jimenez. 6 aspectos que poco se conocen de las remesas: Eduardo Torreblanca. Los Impresentables con Erick Alcántara. ¿Tensión México - Estados Unidos? Biden y Trump amenazan con cerrar la frontera. Humor y sátira política con Fernando Canek. Lo mejor de los deportes con Guillermo Shutz.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

durée : 00:36:23 - Le 18/20 · Le téléphone sonne - C'est officiel : à partir de Novembre, Meta, l'entreprise de Mark Zukerberg proposera un accès sans pub à ses plateformes, à la condition de payer chaque mois. Cela sonne t'il la fin de l'eldorado du web social ?

En este episodio de CRUDO hablamos del creador de facebook el pseudogenio Mark Zukerberg y sus ocurrencias.

Today we are drinking Matcha and Soda with a twist of Orange.  This is a dope drink that Mike found in Japan.  As we sip the green bubble goodness we talk about time.  Also Mike has been watching some weird movies lately.  We also hope the Mark Zukerberg and Elon Musk have their JiuJitsu battle i space and the Richard Branson is the reff.  Enjoy! CHECK OUT TODAYS MATCHA AT: Matcha Garden Instagram:  @matchagardenjp CHECK OUT OUR DISCOUNT CODES: Doctor Coffee https://www.doctor-coffee.com/ Discount Code:   COFFEEREG $5 off your first order Wild Gift Coffee https://wildgiftcoffee.com/ Discount Code: COFFEEREG 10% off any order, single use GOLD LEAF JOURNALS  https://shopgoldleaf.com/products/coffee-journal Discount Code: COFFEEREGULAR  15% off anything in the shop CHECK OUT TRANQUILITY CAFE AT: https://www.thetranquilitycafe.com/ CHECK OUT THE LEGION PROJECT AT: https://thelegionproject.com/ CHECK US OUT ON: SHOPIFY: https://coffee-regular-podcast.myshopify.com/ SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/4ZhSOy5oDAHOAm4ggUdL2V?si=5DBsXhK3R2ufSMgpgtFGng iTUNES: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/coffee-regular/id1460681914 PODBEAN AT: https://coffeeregularshow.podbean.com FACEBOOK AT: Coffee Regular Podcast INSTAGRAM AT: @coffeeregularpodcast    

E News: Mark Zukerberg is fighting with his wife, John Legend's kids have the best rooms, NASA streaming services, Bruce Willis could be in a new film, and Beyonce disses Lizzo. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rell and Kev are back from a week of vacation and they are joined by our resident Denver Nuggets fan @its_the_dbro where we discussed the their Championship and the Golden Knights Stanley Cup win. During Kev's "Not List" the guys get a little heated while discussing Elon Musk and Mark Zukerberg's potential cage fight. Lastly, the guys breakdown the Washington Wizards blowing things up and causing chaos throughout the league. We give our reactions to the NBA Draft. Thank you for watching/Listenining !

In this episode we talk NASA holds panel to take questions about UFO's, Biden falls during speech, Al Pacino expecting a kid, Robert England retires from playing Freddy, Mark Zukerberg choked out during martial arts tournament, Danny Masterson goes to jail, Bud light continues to take L's, Florida woman leaves kids in car to go shop lift and the car bursts into flames, and much more! Check us out Facebook here: https://www.facebook.com/TokyoBlackHour/   Check out the Youtube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX_C1Txvh93PHEsnA-qOp6g?view_as=subscriber Follow us on Twitter @TokyoBlackPod Get your apparel at https://tkbpandashop.com/  You can also catch us Apple Podcasts, Google Play, and Spotify Check out Every Saturday Morning here https://www.everysaturdaymorning.fun Check out The Basic Caucasian Podcast here https://www.youtube.com/user/dgriffin156

Has Meta CEO, Mark Zukerberg quietly buried the Metaverse? We think so. As he shifts his attention to a shiny new AI toy, it seems the rest of the world is too. But can these advances replace our jobs in the creative, brand marketing industry? For those who are willing to embrace it - we think it could actually be a huge benefit to their career, skill and use of time. The Financial Times have reported on a study that suggests that a four-day working week benefits both staff and employers. On this point, we considering different industries with varied input and output needs, as well as if this makes sense for the future of any workplace. What truly defines a work-life balance nowadays? We look back to pre pandemic and how our perception of this term has altered. Several British stars have turned down the offer to play at King Charles' coronation concert on May 7th, including: Elton John, Robbie Williams, The Spice Girls & Harry Styles. Is this a snub at the new King, or do the stars really have other engagements they have to tend to? Conversation also turns to the non-disclosure around Harry & Meghan's attendance, despite being invited. And finally, Cocaine Bear is a new film to hit the big screen, and people too. The backstory is based on a real-life story where a drug smuggling plan went wrong in the 1980's, resulting in a bear hoovering up a duffel bag of abandoned cocaine and dying shortly after. This film is basically - for those who look into it enough - the bear having its own back on humanity but what do we think about that? Snakes On A Plane and Jaws come up in conversation.

In this episode, Srinath talks about his experience working in early teams at Google and Facebook, what makes Mark Zukerberg special, how Regie is using NLP in their content platform for sales & marketing, email sequencing for sales teams, interview structure to hire sales teams, shorten the ramp time for new AEs, and much more!

Boletim diário com as noticias mais importantes do Brasil e do mundo, apresentado pela monitora Sandra Lacerda, do curso de Jornalismo. Gal Costa morre aos 77 anos; Mark Zukerberg perde 70% da fortuna este ano e anuncia demissão em massa; ANS regulamenta cobertura obrigatória de medicamentos para asma grave e câncer de ovário e de rim.

Jamais la stratégie de Mark Zuckerberg n'avait suscité autant de doutes à Wall Street, et surtout en interne. Mardi soir, à l'occasion de Meta Connect, sa conférence annuelle dédiée au métaverse, le patron de Meta ne devait pas seulement convaincre les développeurs de l'avenir radieux de ce monde virtuel, qu'il considère comme la prochaine plateforme dominante. Il devait aussi rassurer les investisseurs et les salariés du réseau social, engagé dans une profonde transformation. “Les technologies qui alimentent le métaverse commencent à émerger. Le futur n'est pas si loin”, a-t-il assuré. Avant de présenter un nouveau casque réalité mixte, combinant réalités augmentée et virtuelle, destiné aux entreprises, et d'annoncer un partenariat avec Microsoft. Pour ne rien rater de l'actualité tech, inscrivez-vous à notre newsletter: https://inscription-cafetech.gr8.com/

UFC 279 Preview | Diaz vs Chimaev https://traffic.libsyn.com/mmanutsmp3/UFC_279_Preview__Diaz_vs_Chimaev__MMANUTS_MMA_Podcast__EP__577-MP3.mp3 #UFC Cyril Gane vs Tai Tuivasa [5:30] Robert Whittaker vs Marvin Vettori [10:10] UFC 279 Preview [13:54] Nate Diaz vs Khamzat Chimaev [14:19] Anderson Silva vs Jake Paul [17:47] Mark Zukerberg training MMA[22:56] Alex Volkanovski vs Hasbulla [24:32] Floyd Mayweather faceoff [25:23] Weird standup [26:20] The Rock... Read more → The post UFC 279 Preview | Diaz vs Chimaev | MMANUTS MMA Podcast | EP # 577 appeared first on MMANUTS.

UFC 279 Preview | Diaz vs Chimaev https://traffic.libsyn.com/mmanutsmp3/UFC_279_Preview__Diaz_vs_Chimaev__MMANUTS_MMA_Podcast__EP__577-MP3.mp3 #UFC Cyril Gane vs Tai Tuivasa [5:30] Robert Whittaker vs Marvin Vettori [10:10] UFC 279 Preview [13:54] Nate Diaz vs Khamzat Chimaev [14:19] Anderson Silva vs Jake Paul [17:47] Mark Zukerberg training MMA[22:56] Alex Volkanovski vs Hasbulla [24:32] Floyd Mayweather faceoff [25:23] Weird standup [26:20] The Rock... Read more → The post UFC 279 Preview | Diaz vs Chimaev | MMANUTS MMA Podcast | EP # 577 appeared first on MMANUTS.

LE LUNCH BY NOE émission présentée par Philippe Levy, Directeur de la Direction de l'Action Jeunesse du FSJU et ses chroniqueurs  « La vie est un songe ? » Le 29 octobre 2021, Mark Zukerberg annonçait officiellement que son entreprise était rebaptisée Meta, pour muer Facebook à l'obsolescence programmée en Metavers, une nouvelle application de réseautage social en réalité virtuelle. Dans un futur proche, nos jeunes seront certainement  familiers des cryptos pour acheter des NFT dans le Metavers ! Décryptage de ces notions intangibles et non fongibles qui inquiètent les parents autant qu'elles fascinent la jeune génération. Et si les NFT et le Metavers étaient l'avenir d'internet. Un spécialiste des technologies numériques et un usager en débattent !  En seconde partie, halte dans la vraie vie !  A l'approche de l'été, Le Lunch fait un tour d'horizon des colos labellisées par le FSJU pour éclairer le choix des parents.  En studio, deux directeurs de centres de vacances qui parlent de leur passion éducative. »

Interessée par mon offre de coaching ? TU peux m'en dire plus sur tes attentes lors d'un entretien découverte gratuit. Réserve ici! Rejoins moi sur Instagram pour de l'inspiration et des bonnes vibes au quotidien! Notes de l'épisode : Tu peux être et avoir tout ce que tu souhaites. TU peux être l'heroine de ta propre production. Lâcher prise, avoir la foi et passer à l'action avec amour Rêver et envisager son existence comme un film est la seule manière réaliste de vivre sa vie! Traditionnellement : on essaie de contrôler l'avenir en interprétant notre situation courante au prisme du passé ; ça n'a pas de sens et ce n'est pas ainsi qu'on cree quoi que ce soit de nouveau! Oh mais en general, ça ne marche pas comme ca, on peut pas tout avoir, la vie c'est comme ça… regarde autour de nous la moyenne des gens blah blah blah… Pourquoi devrions nous vouloir vivre la vie de tout le monde? ON se doit d'être visionnaire - pensons à Leonard de Vinci par exemple, ou Elon Musk ou Mark Zukerberg, ou à n'importe quelle invention exceptionnelle qui a revolutionné le monde Dans notre carrière au moment d'une reconversion, dans notre démarche d'entrepreneuriat …répondre à un besoin qui n'est pas adressé , ou le faire d'une manière différente Dans nos relations humaines - ré-inventer l'amour Je ne veux pas m'engager avec un nouveau partenaire parce que j'ai fait l'experience de la douleur des ruptures… je suis indépendante, je n'arrive pas à me poser avec une seule personne, je suis bisexuelle, … mais qui sait ce que sera cette relation dans 2 ans? Elle sera complètement différente si tu te donnes la peine de l'inventer comme tu veux qu'elle soit Le problème …CEST EFFRAYANT! La nouveauté fait peur, sortir des rails, ne pas se conformer aux modèles Loi de l'attraction pour manifester consciemment est le seul outil qui m'a permis de dépasser les peurs et les pensées limitantes Parce que le principe est : le “comment” n'est pas mon job! Il est complètement naturel de ne pas avoir toutes les réponses et tout prévu quand on est au debut du chemin Tu ne peux pas faire un plan alors meme que tu ne vis pas les circonstances qui surgissent forcement sur une nouvelle route Dépasser le besoin de ‘se sentir prête!' Réhabiliter nos désirs - “désirer c'est mal!” Dépasser la mentalité du manque et laisser place à l'abondance Ré-enchanter sa vie, y faire entrer plus de magie au quotidien , faire place à un minimum de positivité Guérir ce qui a besoin d'être guéri Se découvrir soi-même - “je suis mon job le plus important et tous mes projets ne sont que le reflet de mon dev perso et de mon expansion” L'Univers est en constante expansion. Et ce sont nos désirs qui participent à cette expansion. Energie en constante expansion. Toi qui desires plus ce n'est que la chose la plus naturelle dans l'Univers. Desirer = créer --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/clio-empireofnow/message

Neste episódio (de explodir a cabeça

Nous avons décidé de consacrer une mini-série à l'avenir des médias à commencer par les réseaux sociaux car l'idée de cette mini-série nous est venu au moment de la panne géante de Facebook il y a quelques semaines. On s'est posé la question suivante : et si Facebook disparaissait ? Et si la panne n'était pas réparée et que Mark Zukerberg annonçait sur twitter «sorry guys, Facebook is down !». Et d'ailleurs, on n'est pas les seuls à y avoir pensé car c'est précisément ce que les twittos commençaient à imaginer avec une sorte de gourmandise limite crépusculaire. Host : Jérôme Badie (Dir. Brand Content - Values) Invité : Johan Hufnagel (Co-fondateur - Loopsider)

In episode 4 of season 5, Liz and Zuly host sans Mari while she enjoys some well-deserved R&R.  The ladies discuss the rebranding of Facebook as Mark Zukerberg unveils the new name Meta Platform, Liz thinks this is a smart move to distract the recent whistleblowing incident that has once again put Zukerberg on the hot seat. Zuly talks about her favorite spooky holiday... Halloween and Liz briefly discuss menopause and the taboos that surround a natural stage in a woman's life.  The ladies are now recording with Riverside FM and if you'd like to watch instead of listening, head on over to YouTube and check out the video version of the podcast. If you have any suggestions, opinions, questions, or comments about this or any episode, please send us a QlonaGram at ElSalonChronicles@gmail.com or DM us via IG. Let's have a conversation. If you like the podcast, please share the podcast with your family, friends, and significant other. You can support us by finding us across all platforms and rating, liking, and review us. If you chat about us, please use the hashtags #Qlona #ElSalonChronicles or #DimeloLinda so that we can see and share you as well. If you want to help the sustainability of El Salon, please consider becoming a patron of Patreon. Become a monthly sustaining member or make a one-time contribution. Every little bit helps. You can also contribute via Paypal, $elsalonchronicles on CashApp and Venmo, or you can purchase our merchandise at www.ElSalonChronicles.com

durée : 00:58:14 - Le 13 / 14 - par : Bruno DUVIC - Alors que Mark Zukerberg vient d'annoncer la création de Metavers en plein scandale des "Facebook Files", Marion L'Hour reçoit la docteur en sciences et entrepreneure Aurélie Jean qui publie "Les algorithmes font-ils la loi".

Mark Zukerberg's announcement that Facebook will now be known as ‘Meta' has sparked a huge reaction - both serious and comical. We find out from an astronaut why trips to the moon might be closer than we think. Europe investigates UK chip-designer sale and a new species of early human who lived 500,000 years ago has been named by scientists. Also why giant pandas are black and white, Jupiter's swirling ‘Great Red Spot' far deeper than we realised and how one business is using robot waiters to combat the staff shortage. Plus we tell you about a new feature that can turn your selfies into videos of the undead. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

En esta ocasión hablamos de la caída de whatsapp, Facebook e Instagram. Las redes sociales más utilizadas por los usuarios internautas se vieron afectadas pero un mantenimiento “mal ejecutado”, o al menos eso fue lo que explicó el jefe de mantenimiento de servidores de la empresa de Mark Zukerberg. Nos remontamos a las antiguas formas de comunicarnos como lo son: llamadas telefónicas y mensajes SMS. Hablamos de la posibilidad de poder vivir de manera eterna a través de inteligencia artificial y nanotecnología que sería integrada a nuestro cuerpo para realizar reparaciones que reducirían el paso de los años en nuestro cuerpo, además, de buscar la cura contra el cancer. Recordamos también la famosa presentación en holograma del rapero de la costa oeste; Tupac Shakur, en un festival de música llamado Coachella, resucitándolo mientras entretenía al público y nos hacía sentir que podríamos ser eternos. No menos importante, hablamos del asistente personal de Amazon llamado “Astro”, que podría ser de gran utilidad, combinando la domótica y la robótica. Por último, aunque no lo parezca, las personas famosas también tienen su propia aplicación de citas, el único requisito es tener miles de seguidores Instagram y el algoritmo hará lo suyo.

Mark Zukerberg aja selalu pakai celana pendek andalannya, apa lo masih percaya sama “Judge the book by it's cover”? #SODA bakal kasi lo tips buat bikin kesan yang baik bareng Maul, Dicky, dan si cantik @Joanne

Esta semana volvió a ser noticia la gran empresa azul de Mark Zukerberg por diferentes noticias negativas, de las cuales seguramente te enteraste porque fué tan importante su fallas que afectó de manera directa e indirecta a millones de personas en el mundo. Hoy queremos hacer un pequeño análisis de los riesgos y peligros de lo que representa Facebook para nuestras escuelas.

The Wake Up Crew Rory Wild, Aunty Brandi and Cliff Jonas every weekday mornings from 6am to 10am

Chào mừng các bạn đã quay trở lại, hôm nay ngày 14 tháng 5 là ngày gì? Mời các bạn cùng theo dõi: SỰ KIỆN 1973 - Skylab , trạm vũ trụ đầu tiên của Hoa Kỳ, được phóng lên.Skylab là trạm không gian phát động và điều hành bởi NASA và là trạm không gian đầu tiên của Hoa Kỳ. 2010 - Tàu con thoi Atlantis được phóng trong sứ mệnh STS-132 để cung cấp thành phần ISS đầu tiên do tàu con thoi của Nga phóng - Rassvet . Ban đầu, đây được dự kiến là lần phóng cuối cùng của Atlantis , trước khi Quốc hội thông qua STS-135 Sinh 1928 - Nhạc sĩ Xuân Hồng (tên thật là Nguyễn Hồng Xuân). Ông nổi tiếng với những nhạc phẩm Bài ca may áo, Xuân chiến khu, Tiếng chày trên sóc Bom Bo, Mùa xuân trên Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Mùa xuân bên cửa sổ 1951 - Quốc vương Campuchia Norodom Sihamoni. Ông là con trai cựu Quốc vương Norodom Sihanouk và Thái hậu Norodom Moninaeth. Hiện nay, ông vẫn chưa lập gia đình. 1984 - Mark Zuckerberg, người sáng lập Facebook. Từ năm 2010, tạp chí Time đã liệt kê tên Zuckerberg trong số 100 người giàu nhất và có ảnh hưởng nhất trên thế giới như là một phần của giải Nhân vật của năm. Vào tháng 12 năm 2016, Zuckerberg đứng thứ 10 trong danh sách những người có ảnh hưởng nhất Thế giới của tạp chí Forbes. 1996 - Martin Garrix, DJ người Hà Lan. Anh đứng thứ nhất trong danh sách 100 DJ hàng đầu của DJ Mag năm 2016 và cũng là người trẻ tuổi nhất được trao danh hiệu này. 1863 - John Charles Fields nhà toán học Canada. là người sáng lập Huy chương Fields cho thành tích xuất sắc trong toán học . 1869 - Arthur Rostron , thuyền trưởng người Anh. Ông được nhớ đến nhiều nhất với tư cách là thuyền trưởng của tàu viễn dương RMS Carpathia khi nó cứu hàng trăm người sống sót khỏi tàu RMS Titanic sau khi con tàu này bị chìm vào năm 1912 ở giữa Bắc Đại Tây Dương. Mất 1919 - Henry J. Heinz , doanh nhân người Mỹ, thành lập Công ty HJ Heinz. Heinz đứng đầu về sốt cà chua ở Mỹ với thị phần vượt quá 50% 1998 - Frank Sinatra , ca sĩ và diễn viên người Mỹ (sinh năm 1915). Ông là một trong những nghệ sĩ âm nhạc có số lượng đĩa bán chạy nhất mọi thời đại, với hơn 150 triệu bản thu âm trên toàn thế giới. Sinatra cũng được biết đến như là một trong những biểu tượng văn hóa đại chúng của thế kỉ 20. #aweektv #markjuckerbegbirthday #facebook #martingarri #14thang5 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/aweek-tv/message

Dave Morin is a multifaceted entrepreneur, investor, and philanthropist. His early career was at Apple, and he then went on to work for Mark Zukerberg at Facebook as one of the original 200 employees (employee #29!) that co-created the Facebook Platform and Facebook Connect. He built his own social media platform called Path after that (which he has since sold) and founded a venture capital firm called Offline Ventures.  Morin serves as Chairman of the Esalen Institute, the leading center for exploring and realizing human potential through experience, education, and research. He is also a Co-Founder & Chairman of Sunrise, a foundation whose mission is to cure depression, reduce suffering, and understand the brain, and he serves as Co-Owner and Board Member of Dwell, the award-winning, category-defining digital media and magazine company serving the global community of architecture and design. Dave is a father, yogi, skier, mountain biker and overall great human. CONNECT WITH DAVE ONLINE: www.linkedin.com/in/davemorinwww.facebook.com/davemorinwww.medium.com/@davemorinwww.angel.co/u/davemorin Michael's album ‘Work Hard And Be Nice' is out now: https://orcd.co/work-hard-and-be-nice Keep in touch with Michael online: https://michaelfranti.com/ The ‘Stay Human' podcast is available wherever you listen to podcasts: www.stayhumanpodcast.com PODCAST EPISODE CREDITS:Executive Producers: Michael Franti and Activist Artists ManagementProducer: Angie Griffith for BPOSITIIVArtist Manager: Caitlin Stone for Activist Artists ManagementManagement Coordinator: Bryce Matthews for Activist Artists ManagementSocial Media Manager: Kaitlyn Parmenter for MediaRowIn Partnership with: American Songwriter Podcast Network (Dan Wise, COO)Presenting Sponsor: Gibson Brands  Instrumental from: “Crazy For You” by Michael Franti Editing (Video and Audio) by: Janelle MeagerAdditional Editing by: Angie Griffith for BPOSITIIV

Dave Morin is a multifaceted entrepreneur, investor, and philanthropist. His early career was at Apple, and he then went on to work for Mark Zukerberg at Facebook as one of the original 200 employees (employee #29!) that co-created the Facebook Platform and Facebook Connect. He built his own social media platform called Path after that (which he has since sold) and founded a venture capital firm called Offline Ventures.  Morin serves as Chairman of the Esalen Institute, the leading center for exploring and realizing human potential through experience, education, and research. He is also a Co-Founder & Chairman of Sunrise, a foundation whose mission is to cure depression, reduce suffering, and understand the brain, and he serves as Co-Owner and Board Member of Dwell, the award-winning, category-defining digital media and magazine company serving the global community of architecture and design. Dave is a father, yogi, skier, mountain biker and overall great human. CONNECT WITH DAVE ONLINE: www.linkedin.com/in/davemorinwww.facebook.com/davemorinwww.medium.com/@davemorinwww.angel.co/u/davemorin Michael’s album ‘Work Hard And Be Nice’ is out now: https://orcd.co/work-hard-and-be-nice Keep in touch with Michael online: https://michaelfranti.com/ The ‘Stay Human’ podcast is available wherever you listen to podcasts: www.stayhumanpodcast.com PODCAST EPISODE CREDITS:Executive Producers: Michael Franti and Activist Artists ManagementProducer: Angie Griffith for BPOSITIIVArtist Manager: Caitlin Stone for Activist Artists ManagementManagement Coordinator: Bryce Matthews for Activist Artists ManagementSocial Media Manager: Kaitlyn Parmenter for MediaRowIn Partnership with: American Songwriter Podcast Network (Dan Wise, COO)Presenting Sponsor: Gibson Brands  Instrumental from: “Crazy For You” by Michael Franti Editing (Video and Audio) by: Janelle MeagerAdditional Editing by: Angie Griffith for BPOSITIIV

Walking is good for us, but it takes a while — it's not the most efficient mode of transportation. But it's not about efficiency; that's not the point. What about the other stuff in our life that can benefit from slowness? Seth and Tsh talk about being slow to reply, slow to respond, and slow to assume, and how we all need to do more of it. Seth: Newsletter | Twitter | Instagram | Website Tsh: Newsletter | Twitter | Instagram | Website Support the show — buy the next round of drinks! Subscribe to the show's Substack Find all the episodes Tsh's Rule of Life workshop Ancient Nutrition Bone Broth Mark Sparrow's tweet @findinginterestingpeople Atlas Obscura Podcast Scroll down for the transcript Tsh: This is A Drink With a Friend, I'm Tsh Oxenreider. Seth: And I'm Seth Haines. Tsh: Seth, what are you drinking this afternoon?  Seth: Have you ever heard of Ancient Nutrition? Tsh: No. I've heard of those two words.  Seth: The brand Ancient Nutrition. Yes, you know ancient and you know nutrition. The is a brand called Ancient Nutrition and they make bone broth. Powdered bone broth.  Tsh: Oh yeah. Seth: Today, I was noticing I was a little low on my protein intake which is to say a lot low. I need a lot of protein. I went to Ozark Natural Foods which is our local co-op, our local Whole Foods competitor. I try to go there any time I can instead of Whole Foods. I picked up a packet of Ancient Nutrition Chocolate Bone Broth that tastes amazing!  Tsh: Okay! This comes full circle to a few episodes ago when you talked about anything chocolate and healthy is terrible.  Seth: I know. Someone on A Drink With a Friend that sponsors the drinks has recommended some things which I have not gotten around to trying but in preparation for today while I was at ONF looking for high protein foods, I saw this and it was chocolate flavored and it was $3 and it had 20 grams of protein, less than sugar, very few carbs. I thought I'm going to try this and while I drink it on the air I'm going to report to the people about whether it's good or terrible as all healthful chocolate things are terrible, this is kind of amazing.  Tsh: Nice. I'm literally looking it up right now. Seth: I mixed it in, it recommends 12 ounces, it would probably be better, but I mixed it in 16 ounces of hot water. It would be super amazing in hot cashew milk or almond milk.  Tsh: That's great to know because bone broth drinks are expensive so to me, $3 is not that bad.  Seth: Well, for a packet. I use it as a meal supplement so I think the bigger tub of it is quite expensive but still amazing. If you use it as a snack or a supplement, I highly recommend it. Tsh: Very cool. Seth: I'm assuming I know what you're drinking because you texted me before we went on that you were running a few minutes late because you were making your drink which is… Tsh: Coffee. Black coffee. I don't drink coffee that much when we talk because I can't do caffeine after 2 pm but this is 1 pm so I can still do it, I'm in the window. It's just my standard Cafe Creole Ethiopian coffee that's just good. It's nothing fancy but it's really good coffee from the grocery store. I actually added a cinnamon stick because I was just reading cinnamon in the nutritional benefits so I'm just tossing it in there. I am actually testing out a theory. After we record, I'm going to take a 15-minute nap. I was just watching this YouTuber talk about the weird unknown effects of taking a power nap after drinking coffee and that it does something or other that I can't remember and I'm going to test to see if it's complete sh*t or if he's telling the truth. We'll see. I've never been able to take good naps but I'm desperate for some sleep.  Seth: Can you report back? Tsh: I will report back.  Seth: Interestingly you said, the amazing health benefits of a cinnamon stick and I don't know what that even means.  Tsh: It's like digestion, mental clarity, and what is that called? The bio-gut stuff. Whatever that's called. It promotes healthy bacteria growth, the good bacteria and not the bad bacteria. That is a very scientific way of explaining what I just said.  Seth: That sounds pretty amazing. Maybe I need to get eat a cinnamon stick today.  Tsh: Don't do that. That's probably toxic or something. We are not doctors.  Seth: Yes, that's right. Tsh: We're kicking off, I don't know if you want to call this a series because they're basically not non-sequiturs so in my mind they are kind of a series. This week and next week, we're going to talk about these two ideas we've had on our minds. Today, what's been on my mind because it's been on my mind all week, is this idea of slow. This is not new. I've talked about slow and moving slowly through life frequently in many different places so I'm kind of reinventing the wheel here except I want to talk about it in a slightly different way. The thing that's got me thinking about this is my current workout routine. I've been walking about six miles a day for the past seventeen days. Today's my eighteenth day of walking six miles a day.  Seth: Wow, that's amazing. How long does that take you to walk?  Tsh: Believe it or not, not as much as you think. Here's the thing, I don't do it in one sitting. I do it all throughout the day. I'm very grateful to live in a very walkable neighborhood. I've made this commitment post-Lent to walk anywhere a mile or less and so I've just been walking everywhere. I take a morning walk, afternoon, and evening walk but then I sometimes just get up and walk around the block. It's for mental clarity in a lot of ways but also for a lot of other health benefits. And it's really been a net positive for me. I was doing some reading about it. We all just know walking is good for us but here's the thing, it's really slow, that's a big duh, but it's a slow form of working out and it doesn't feel like you're doing a lot. It feels like you're doing the thing you've done since you were eighteen months old. It's gotten me thinking about what does it look like to move slower through life. I've been thinking about three different ways that I think we can all move a little slower. Before I get into those three things, unpack with me a little bit, Seth, what does slow look like for you right now? Are you able to be slow at all in any capacity in your life at the moment?  Seth: Yeah, in some capacities. I juggle a lot of hats from a courier perspective mostly because I've made now two career shifts in the last two years. One away from the practice of law and one back into the practice of law so I've had to juggle both of those transitions. I'm in the middle of one of those transitions right now. From a business perspective, I always feel like my hair is on fire. Everything moves so fast. The practice of law moves pretty fast anyway. The content development and coaching and book editing and writing move pretty fast, too, with the kind of work that I do in that space. My day feels pretty fast. In the last few months, I've really been focused on, we've talked about this before, I've been doing CrossFit now for almost a year and I've been focused on not just doing CrossFit but then building some endurance work on top of that that is intentionally steady state cardio which because I'm forty-three is much slower than when I was twenty-three. I have been intentionally seeking a slower rhythm and slower pace probably four to five times a week. Whether that's by sitting on a rower and just clocking off forty-five minutes or whether that's going on a long run to have that slower state cardio. That slow time is really helpful for me because it pulls me away from that breakneck speed and I find, actually yesterday, I had a slow row day and there was this issue I was having a hard time unlocking. Within ten minutes, I texted the answer to somebody. That slow, slowing down, being disconnected from the internet, being connected really only to yourself and your thoughts has been really helpful for me. I really have to seek it out. I am not as good at it probably as you are. I would love to hear more about your journey into slowness. But before, I have a couple of technical questions.  Tsh: Okay. Seth: One, is your morning, afternoon, and evening walk for mileage? Tsh: It's for steps officially but I also look at the mileage so I've got a Fitbit, our whole family has them now, actually. I wanted to track a number of things but yes, technically it is. I walk our dog most of those walks and I just keep track. I officially check for 10,000 steps a day but it roughly checks out at four to six miles a day what I end up clocking. I go for mileage. Seth: That was my second question, is how many steps is six miles? Tsh: 10,000 steps for me equal to about four miles. 15,000 steps get northward of six. The reason I'm going to switch to looking at more miles, now that I've got in the habit, it feels weird, eighteen days in a row of doing 10,000 plus steps, it feels normal to me. The thing I've thought about is everybody's steps are different, right?  Seth: Right. Tsh: My gait is a lot shorter than Kyle's because I'm a foot shorter than him. But five miles is five miles. That's why I'm using that as a metric more probably in the near future.  Seth: Those are my two questions. Miles and steps. I think that's good when we're talking about slow exercise or slowness in general, but with slow exercise, I think one of the things is having a consistent metric. When I think of rowing, for instance, yesterday I rowed a 10K and it took me forty-five minutes but I'm also really long and generate a lot of leverage and so somebody who rowing next to me and rowing a 10K who might be shorter, maybe like you, would have to pull a whole lot more and so the amount of energy generated isn't quite the same. That's why a lot of times people will say run for time, pull for time, and row for time when you're doing these slower cardio, steady-state cardio events. I like the idea of saying let's pick a metric that is the [inaudible] same and do that. Tsh: Yeah, for sure. For me, one of the things I've noticed the past few weeks is I started off doing it for the physical health benefits but the mental health and the emotional health have been right there with it to where that's one of the reasons why it starts feeling weird to me to not walk as much. Let's say I get closer to 10K versus 15K, I can feel the steps. I can feel it. For me, the gains have been mostly mental because let's face it, I'm not sore after walking six miles, it's not hard. It really is not. But the mental clarity and the emotional clarity have been so great and here's the reason. Our bodies release cortisol when we work out, that's just how they do it. Women, in particular, release more cortisol than men and that's the stress hormone. We need that stress hormone. It's not about getting rid of cortisol but it's about having it released at the right times or for the right reasons. Right now, I'm trying to lower my cortisol levels because I'm trying to get better sleep and I'm trying to work on my mental health, my constant monkey brain. I need to lower my cortisol levels and walking is a great way to do it because it's one of the only forms of active working out that lower cortisol level, not elevates it. That's why I feel like the mental and emotional benefits have been really solid for me. That's where I want to park on because as much as we like to talk about fitness and we will continue to, I think we all can relate a little bit to thinking slower and maybe reacting a little slower to the things in our life. We've all been through a global pandemic and I think most of us have experienced a slowing down of our life in the past twelve months because of our calendars, that they have emptied. I don't know about you, Seth, but that was to me, probably the best benefit of something like this that has not been a good thing. I have welcomed the lowered expectations of me needing to be somewhere at a certain time and having to run all over town to take kids places, stuff like that. It's been a really nice slowing down in that department.  Seth: I agree with you 100%. We were talking the other night about how there was a moment early in the pandemic when my business on one front slowed down so much that I was actually concerned. But by the same token, we were eating out zero, we were going zero, we were driving zero, and we started realizing maybe we're losing a little bit of money but we're also saving a ton of money just as a result of the slowness. Then we started realizing we're more connected, we're spending more time together, we see each other just because the pace of life had slowed down so much. Over the last six months, it's slowly creeped up and I miss some of those things, some of that slow time. I just miss it.  Tsh: Yeah, I do too. This is for me why it's a benefit to do something like walk because you can claim it. Walking is completely not efficient. You don't get anywhere quickly when you walk. If I choose to walk to the pharmacy to pick up a prescription or to the library to pick up a book, by walking I'm intentionally taking the harder, slower, more methodical route. But I welcome the space. Many times I listen to an audiobook or a podcast but I'm also really and truly embracing the being with my thoughts, especially in the Spring when I can hear birds and wind and things like that and I don't want to miss them.  What's been on my mind is this idea that we can all collectively understand, three different ways that we can embrace a more sacramental nature of slow and it all has to do with response. Responding to the world around us. The first one, and I'm curious what you think, Seth. Actually, while I pull it up, I'm pulling up a tweet that I retweeted. I didn't write it but I loved it, I read it last week. How quickly do you respond to email? Seth: I'm not super great at it. Some of it is that I put parameters around my time. If you shoot me a business email that's non-urgent after hours I'm not going to respond. Period. End of story. Until business hours. There are exceptions to that. I have a client who will periodically text me something and he's in a different time zone and will text and say I know it's after hours but will you look at the email, then yeah. I will do that. I am probably an efficient responder to emails but I'm not always timely because I don't respond after hours. I'm pretty slow.  Tsh: I'm very slow. No one will give me an award for inbox zero, ever. I saw this tweet, it's by a guy named Mark Sparrow, I don't know who it is but just says,  “Best email signature ever: It is normal for me to take a couple of days to read my emails and several more days to reflect on the matter and respond in a calm manner. The culture of immediacy and the constant fragmentation of time are not compatible with the kind of life I lead.”  Seth: That's amazing.  Tsh: I know. It feels a little stick it to the man-ish. I can see how somebody can read it and think who are you to say that this is not compatible with the life you lead? I need an answer ASAP. But I really like this because I think the point of an email signature like this is saying, listen, these things you are putting in my inbox, you're not owed a quick response. Someone even commented below that when they started work in the early 90s it was just a normal practice to not respond to a letter within two weeks. This sudden expectation for a same day, sometimes same hour response is just not realistic. I once heard my favorite definition of an email inbox, it was like a to-do list from somebody else, or a to-do list for someone else's time. I forget how they said it. Basically, it's people wanting things from you most of the time. For me, I really like this idea of embracing a slow to reply posture. I've done this for a long time. I've had this no-need-to-reply practice to my emails but to me, I feel like this might be an encouragement to anyone listening that there is perhaps not as urgent a need to reply to that email, to that Slack message, to that text, to that request to volunteer at your kid's end of the year banquet, all these things that you have permission to think it over before you reply to something like that. Seth: It seems to me that one of the benefits of your walking practice, if I'm thinking of it in practical terms, is if I were to walk more everywhere I went and an email came across on my way to the library, 1) I might not even see it unless I'm looking at my phone if I'm walking which feels antithetical to the whole point; but 2) even if you did receive it, are you going to stop on the side of the road and sit there and type it out with your thumbs? Probably not. It feels like even when you're talking about this, and maybe this is part of your initial point, is that as you go on these walks and as you slow down, the tyranny of the urgent actually can't reach out and grab you by the throat.  Tsh: 100%. That's one of the great beauties of this. I think just being outside at minimum is this invitation to detach from the ability to be immediate. In fact, I have been tempted by the idea of leaving my phone, which I know sounds like, just leave your phone, what's the big deal? But for me, because of the audiobook/podcast tethering, I haven't done it and I've been more reluctant but I think I'm going to try. Here's the thing. I barely check my email on the phone anyway but I'm still reachable. I still could be reached. That is one of the great beauties of a slower posture is intentionally making it inconvenient, let's just say, to reply quickly to things in life.  Seth: That's sort of a side practice. I've heard people talk about this with respect to social media. How do you slow down the onslaught of social media and social media demands on your time? Responding to every comment on any, choose your platform, or making sure that you post on, choose your platform, which is all pretty vacuous stuff, if we're being super honest. Although my beautiful thing that I'm going to share today is literally an Instagram profile. Anyway, that aside, I have often heard it said that if you want to live a slower life, if you want to not be dragged into the tyranny of the urgent, then make it more difficult to get to [insert the platform], your Instagram, your Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, whatever the next thing is, make it inconvenient.  Tsh: Yeah, add some friction there. I don't have Twitter on my phone. I currently have Instagram on my phone because I was working on a thing. But for a better part of the pandemic, I deleted it and only downloaded it on Friday's and that was fantastic to where I had to intentionally go and download it, re-sign in, retell it yes, you can have access to my photo library, and it was really good for me because I wouldn't just mindlessly scroll when I was waiting at a checkout line. But I could still access it on my laptop but there's something a little more intentional about opening up your laptop and that's the same with Twitter. That's actually a nice segue to my second form of being slow and that's a flip side of the same coin, and that's being slow to respond, which I know is similar to slow to reply. It's this idea that something in this culture of ours has dictated that we should respond to situations right away if we're to be good people. I made the foolish decision the other day to scroll through my unsubscribe messages, why people unsubscribe from my email. I never do that. I know not to do that. Seth: A bad idea.  Tsh: It's never helpful. It's like looking at book reviews. They're not helpful for me. Seth: It's actually like going and asking people that hate you why they hate you to their face. Just let it go, who cares? It doesn't matter.  Tsh: I don't care why you've unsubscribed. But this one person unsubscribed from me because I did not respond to a current newsworthy event that happened not too long ago. I didn't make a statement in my weekly email and so she decided that was worth an unsubscribe and worth telling me. Here's the thing. I didn't even know what happened because I closed up all these links because I had a book deadline. I literally did not know what happened. My silence was for a reason. But here's the thing, even if I did know what happened, if I didn't reply to it, that doesn't make me a bad person. If anything, it simply made me a person who needed to think or maybe let other people who are wiser than me or have more ownership in the issue or stake in the issue, speak about the thing. I just find it interesting that we live in this world that says if you're remotely online, which is honestly all of us, most people have chosen to be on social media if they're listening to a podcast, that you need to say something. I just think that's really, really weird. I don't like it. Seth: Yesterday, I was watching some awkward Mark Zukerberg moments. That was the title of the YouTube video clip. I was actually looking for something to make this meta-joke. This is all getting really weird, what I'm about to tell you. I was looking for a clip to make a meta-joke on Instagram in a Reels post. It was going to be this really snarky meta-joke about Reels themselves.  Tsh: Got it. Seth: I started looking for awkward moments of Mark Zukerberg and I happened to run into this one and he was before Congress and they were asking him questions and they said something like, Mr. Zukerberg, you're not from here, you flew into DC to talk to us, would you mind telling us publicly where you stayed last night? He just stood there and laughed and said, no. Then they asked, would you mind telling us where you ate dinner last night? He said, no, I don't really want to do that either. They said would you at least tell us how much money you spent on dinner last night? He said no, I don't really want to do that either. They said, yet, you're providing this platform that encourages those people to do all of these things immediately. Everybody got a good chuckle out of it. He got a good chuckle out of it, too. The point held, was that we feel the need to instantly tell everybody everything about us just because we can. That feels bonkers and then when you bring that into a news response scenario, it gets really tricky because, in the last week and a half, three major news outlets have had to come out and say we missed a story. We missed it, we misreported, we gave some bad facts, we correct those facts, here are the facts. Facts are still bad but they were reported inaccurately. If you had spent the time to immediately respond to the inaccurate facts, then are you going to go back and immediately respond to the correction? It's a cycle that never ends and there are some things that just demand a lot more thought. On top of those two things, I look at some of the issues that make major news cycles these days and I think about systemic racism, which is in my opinion, a very real thing, a very terrible thing, that needs to be dismantled in the United States.  Tsh: Yep. Seth: And in my local town.  Tsh: Yeah. Seth: I know people who are doing amazing work in the realm of really dismantling these systems who are not on social media and who are very quietly doing amazing work. I would rather continue to watch them do amazing work than jump on to social media and always have to have a response. I've always felt like there are times that you do need to immediately say something if you know about it. Come out and say the thing, be clear, be honest, be who you are. But also, that's no substitute for doing really good quiet work that no one ever knows about. That is slow. That is not instant. Tsh: Exactly. That actually brings me perfectly to the third point, which is being slow to assume.  Seth: Yeah. Tsh: People are nuanced and the Internet, by and large, is not. People are three-dimensional, our screens are two-dimensional. It is hard to pick up on, not only tone and rhetoric but also what's not being said. Someone's silence could very well be because they're doing the on-the-ground, un-sexy, hard work of dismantling racism or sexism or poverty or whatever the issue is, in their local community and it is a better use of their gifts and resources and energy than having some kind of public statement in a tweet. Even when we're not talking about issues or newsworthy events, just looking at somebody online, looking at their body of work, and deciding why it may or may not be for you. To bring it back again to those unsubscribes, I noticed a few other people had mentioned that they decided to unsubscribe once they heard that we had joined the Catholic Church as a family, which is a whole other thing which maybe we can get to later on this podcast. The reason is that they assume that because we have basically put ourselves under the authority of the Catholic Church, then it means we believe and feel A, B, and C about a certain type of person, a certain belief, a certain you name it. They're jumping to this huge conclusion based on this one thing they know about me and they don't know me, really. Here's what it comes down to, I have messed up their idea of who they want me to be. Or I've messed with their version that they want about me and because I am not offering that now, they've been given another piece of information they don't know what to do with it and they just decided they can't have it. Here's the thing. I am all for the act of unsubscribing whenever you just flat out can't have something in your life for whatever certain reason. People are not for everyone and that's completely fine. I follow a podcast that I learn a lot from. I really do not like this podcaster's politics at all. We are on very opposite ends of the political spectrum but I still subscribe to his podcast because I can learn from him and I appreciate that his posture is one of humility and he is nuanced and I appreciate that. Let's be slow to assume. Seth: Again, part of the work of slowness and the work of slowly getting to know yourself and being comfortable with yourself and who you are, means that when people make snap judgments about you and you have clarity about who you are, what you believe, and what you're about, what you're supposed to be about, some of those things just roll off your back a little bit differently. If you have the confidence of someone who has done the slow, hard work and continues to do the slow, hard work and continues to change, and be open to new ideas and move in different ways, then some of that stuff can just float away. I will ask because I think it's a fascinating question, were the assumptions, based on your joining of the Catholic Church, were there both conservative and liberal people who assumed quasi opposite things about you as a result?  Tsh: 100%. It's fascinating to me. I think maybe this is why the Catholic Church can feel so uncomfortable to people because it's so old it doesn't fit into anybody's modern categories. It does a great job of pissing off both the liberals and the conservatives. It's uncomfortable for me. There are some things that I'm like, ehhhhh, I don't know.  Seth: Because you're human! Tsh: Exactly, that's what we're saying, right? Of course, this is just one example of nuance. I'm not at all implying that this is the book of where nuance lies. We can be nuanced and not be Catholic. This is just my reality at the moment. I'm rattling people's ideas of who they thought I was. They thought because I promoted candidate X, then, of course, I must believe this way theologically. Or because I make these decisions about my kids' education then, of course, I also think these other things. Nobody is one way. We are all just a mixed bag of stuff. I can't think of what it is.  Seth: I took some of that heat. Amber and I took some of that heat after the election. Go look through my profiles. I was very clear. I'll just say to the listener here, I voted for Joe Biden. I very much supported Joe Biden. Not because I agree with everything Joe Biden says and certainly not because I consider myself a Democrat. But I felt like we were at an imperative point in American history and I felt like, of the two candidates, there was one candidate that could get us where we needed to go out of that imperative moment at least head us in the right direction, point us in the right direction. Does that mean that I'm 100% pro-abortion? No. Not at all.  Tsh: Exactly. Seth: I've been very, very clear about that. Yet, I took heat from people saying that same thing. How could you ever support abortion? That's not what I was doing. I think part of the problem, and this is not to make it about politics. I have very good friends who will vote another way and I'm still very close friends with them and will continue to be. Typically when we get in a room I can vehemently disagree with their political opinion and we can still find common ground where we still love each other and still have productive conversations but that is primarily because we're in relationship not because we're in this weird subscriber/consumer/producer relationship. I think once we start to commodify each other and impute meaning to each other that maybe not warranted or not fair and in that commodity turn sour or disappoints then it's really easy to throw the commodity away and say Tsh, you're a commodity, I'm done with you. Seth, you're a commodity, I'm done with you. I do this to people, too. I'm a human too, so I have done this, too. I think part of what we have to get back to, again, back to your slowness, we have to get back to the slow art of paying attention. We talked about this a little bit with other writers, the art of paying attention a few years back. I don't know if you remember that. That's the primary work of the writer. I think that's actually the primary work of the writer because it's the primary work of the human. Paying attention. Slowing down. Listening to each other. Not being so quick to throw each other away. Listen, like you said, if I'm not for you, please go find the person that's for you. I'm totally cool with that. You're not hurting my feelings but don't throw your assumptions on me.  Tsh: Exactly. I think that seeing is the act of being sacramental. This morning I heard this fantastic definition of sacramentality, which is simply seeing the world as it really is. Since we like to talk about that here and since this episode, in particular, is about slowness, just to bring it full circle. We have a neighbor down the street, who during the election had all sorts of signs in their yard for the opposite candidate our family had signs in our yard for, or at least that we were voting for, they were Trump supporters, basically. They felt compelled to put signs out in their yard for that. I admit that I was probably quick to judge what they might have been like as people. Fast forward, in my walking habit, I nearly every day past their house. It is a sweet older couple who have a fantastic backyard garden that I can see because it's a corner lot. They are the nicest people. They say hello. They talk about our dog. Our neighbor across the street who drives a Harley, he's been over there. I've seen him in their garage chit-chatting. They are beacons of the neighborhood because they've been here a long time. I've really grown to appreciate who they are as people, just a sweet older couple. For me, that's my lesson. These people are nuanced and I slowed down enough to walk past their house and recognize that and I don't think I would have if I just drove by their house all the time.  Seth: I think that is key for this moment in our country, is just being slow enough to actually get to know each other as people not as avatars, not as thoughts or ideas on a screen. One of the things Amber and I have been talking about, we've actually talked about it on this podcast, Amber and I have been talking about why do Instagram quotables work to drive audience engagement? I just freaking refuse to do it. I refuse to do it. I know it would be good for my audience but I cannot do it. The reason I think that I push so much against it is just the instant gratification of quotable words in a moment that don't make us wrestle with the meaning of an image. Some of what I'm going to share today in what is beautiful to me right now is an artist who is legitimately the viewer wrestle with the art of an image and it takes time. You can't necessarily impute meaning and it's important.  Tsh: Go ahead and tell us about this then because that was going to be my next question is what's adding beauty to your life. Tell me more.  Seth: There's an account called @findinginterestingpeople. I actually sent you the link so that while we're talking you can pull it up, maybe. Tsh: I'm pulling it up right now.  Seth: If you look, it's just black and white street photography by I think a female artist who's just capturing the world through her lens. Every one of these photos is either an interesting composition or an interesting person and it really makes you stop and say, what is the story of that photograph. Again, you have to slow down and stop and look at these photos and spend time with them and say what is it about this that's compelling? And they're all compelling to me.  Tsh: These are fantastic. First of all, it's in New York, which has so many street images that it's just interesting to those of us that don't live in that environment. I love that she's done black and white and I like that it's not quotes. I agree. These are real photos.  Seth: I don't know why, my assumption is that it's a woman and I'm not 100% sure why because I'm looking at the profile and it doesn't really say that. What is super interesting is that I've already made an assumption based on these images and the way that these images have been captured makes me think this is a female looking at the world. Even that is just a fascinating assumption on my part. Tsh: You're the one that really gave me that idea last year about thinking of Instagram more as a museum and it has made me hate it so much less. I'm not yet at the point where I like it. I don't think I like it as much as you but I don't hate it like I used to, so I appreciate it.  Seth: The curation has made the world of difference in my life.  Tsh: Yeah. That's very cool. It's like visual poetry. Seth: 100%. I actually talked about this in my last newsletter because I've been having such a hard time writing. What I have found is that if I can find the right image, it somehow unlocks the words. These last three to four weeks of just having a real struggle writing, it's unlocking words for me.  Tsh: That's really cool. I think it's funny, I went to my homepage and it's literally @#!%. It is jarring. I'm unfollowing right now.  Seth: You've got to mute those things. What you should do is, Kyle, put a big long beep there and then me coming back and saying, you've got to mute those things.  Tsh: That's a good idea. Do that, Kyle. Seth: What are you listening to, watching, reading, that is making your life a little bit more good, true, beautiful? Tsh: Right now, it is a new-to-me podcast that I did not know existed because I thought they just did written stuff. Have you heard of the website Atlas Obscura?  Seth: No. Tsh: I think you would like it. It's a great travel website but apparently, they do a podcast and I started bingeing on this podcast the past week and it is a delight. One of the reasons I like it is because each episode is only fifteen minutes long. There's a place for shorter podcasts and I'm here for it. It is a podcast about the weird obscure, unknown places around the world that would never make a travel guide or you would walk by and never know. The first episode I listened to was from a few weeks ago and it was called Brooklyn Latrine and it was about this buried latrine before there was indoor plumbing in this guy's backyard. It's really well produced. The sound is great. It's like reporting but it's reporting about mundane things that we walk by and I thought it was perfect for this particular episode of talking about slow and walking because it feels like they discovered these things by going on walks and unpacking these unknown places. There's one about a sourdough library.  Seth: What?? Tsh: Yeah. There's the one about this tiny little place in Malawi. There's a thousand-year-old rose somewhere. There's a thing about communist mummies. Snake dens. There are just really cool, tiny, little, weird, bizarre places. I feel like it's a great audio form of armchair travel. If you're feeling the itch to get the heck out of dodge because of this pandemic and you still just can't, this is a really good podcast for that. Two thumbs up for me. I'm glad to have found a new travel podcast.  Seth: That sounds pretty amazing. I'm going to have to listen to that.  Tsh: It's really good. I think listeners of this show, if you like our show, you'll probably like this show.  Seth: That's awesome. Tsh: It's time to wrap up this episode. You can find this episode, as well as all episodes, at adrinkwithafriend.com. It's also where you can sign up for our new Substack space for the show, where we have plans for some pretty great extra stuff for you, and it's also where you can support this show for just a few bucks. If you like what we're bringing to your earbuds, we are almost 100% listener-supported and we like it that way — so again, all this is at adrinkwithafriend.com and in the show notes of this episode. You can find me and all my work at tshoxenreider.com — Seth, where can people find you? Seth: sethaines.com and like last week, follow me over on Instagram @sethhaines. Tsh: You're doing good work there. I appreciate it. Seth: Thanks, I appreciate it. I'm really excited about the next photo that I'm going to release which I found on my phone, taken in Kansas City in 2017. You will see it probably by the time this episode goes out.  Tsh: Very cool. Look forward to it. Music for the show is by Kevin MacLeod, editing is by Kyle Oxenreider, and Caroline TeSelle is our transcriber and assistant extraordinaire. I'm Tsh Oxenreider, and Seth and I will be back here with you soon. Thanks for listening. Subscribe at drink.substack.com This is a public episode. Get access to private episodes at thecommon.place/subscribe

Tampa's Best Pre-Friday Pregam Party is Back and Live for the first time EVER! The hosts Steve Cash, Michael Lake aka Hillsborough Slim, and CP34 discuss the 5 major male social and sexual archetypes! Are you a Kevin Samuels, Michael B, Ross Geller or Mark Zukerberg? You too can be part of the party, just DM us below and Remember to Subscribe to this video and follow us at @shiftedvisionmedia and @the_pour_up on all socials.

From producers to consumers, TikTok has changed the way we use social media and our time online. TikTok has made both producing video content, and consuming video content ridiculously simple. It's made getting paid to create insanely simple as well with the TikTok creator fund only requiring 10,000 followers (plus some other straight forward requirements) to start making money from the app. The simple video idea has also been taken by Instagram and turned into Reels. This is the new explore page on IG. It's also been given the centre button, replacing the old post one ... it's almost as if Instagram is begging us to spend time scrolling the reels page. When these can be promoted Instagram will hit a major cross road in where it wants to take the platform. The scary thing for us is that Mark Zukerberg owns FB and IG which dominates social media .. the data they have is honestly priceless. Mixed with the fact that Google (who own Youtube) predict that by the end of this year (2021), 80% of ALL content consumed online will be through video. With human beings attention span dropping below that of a fucking goldfish ... I do not doubt that for a second. Most people hate reading .. is why we MUST show, not tell. Video has unlimited potential to express unlimited messages. Get creative. One. Join The Gorilla Gang Connect with Benji on Instagram

Source de motivation. من القصص الي تخلينا نعرفو أنو الموهبة إدا منميتهاش و مادارمتش عليها منوصلوش لوين رانا حابين

Hello ceux qui savent contourner la censure chinoise, cette chronique vous est dédiée.Clubhouse c’est le nouveau réseau social dont on va vous parler tout le temps. Ce réseau a déjà créé un scandale à Berlin dont Thomas Zribi vous parlait lundi, dans "Ailleurs dans le monde". C’est une appli, créée par deux anciens de Google qui se présente comme un nouveau réseau social uniquement sonore et par petit groupe. Tout passe par la voix. Dès lors, on a du mal à imaginer, comment on pourrait être dans des discussions de 1000 personnes en même temps.Et tout le petit monde de la silicon Valley s’y presse, attend son invitation pour cette appli gratuite depuis qu'Elon Musk et Mark Zukerberg ont choisi l’appli pour développer leur vision du futur. France 24 rappelle que si l’appli est gratuite, l’écrémage se fait quand même par le haut car il faut un iPhone et un compte apple américain pour y accéder. Pourtant en une semaine, il est devenu le réseau de la contestation chinoise. On explique les différentes raisons de cet engouement pour Clubhouse depuis la chine. Déjà, l’appli ne conserve pas les échanges, qui ne peuvent pas être sauvegardé contre ceux qui y participent. D’autre part, sans trace écrite, puisque tout se passe par le son, la censure chinoise, basée sur des mots clés et expressions interdite l’écrit, s’exerce beaucoup plus difficilement. Depuis quelques jours donc, les conversations se multipliaient en mandarin. On y évoquait entre chinois la répression des ouïghours, les avantages politiques d’habiter à Taïwan, la situation au Tibet... Bref Autant de sujets tabous sur les réseaux sociaux chinois. Ce week end, les invitations à rejoindre Clubhouse, application gratuite, se vendait jusqu’à 80 dollars sur Taobao, un site en vente en ligne. En Chine, on ne s’est pas méfié au début de ce réseau social qui semblait plutôt inoffensif, pas fait pour exciter les envies de débattre librement mais devant le succès de l’appli des débats où participaient parfois jusqu’à 700 personnes, les autorités se sont crispées. Depuis lundi, la censure est tombée et ClubHouse est interdit en chine. C'est en tout cas ce que disent les utilisateurs chinois sur WeChat mais d’autres racontent qu’ils réussissent encore à utiliser des VPN pour contourner l’interdiction. Le jeu du chat et de la souris continue et ça ne se passe pas exactement comme dans Tom et Jerry See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

It's the penultimate episode of Men's Month 2020, so Catie, Hannah and Taylor decided the time had come to unleash the super-sleuthing skills of the one and only, comedian, writer and podcast king - Mr Adam Buxton!If you're in need of some fun and frivolity (and let's face it, you probably are), then look no further than this episode, which features stories from some of Adam's many bike related crime stories, which may (or may not) involve Mark Zukerberg and a listener's fridge based mystery - which Adam solves in just two words - he really is an asset to the force.Our crime busting boozers, also dive into a story, which takes us into the world of art and involves perhaps one of the worst attempts at a criminal disguise - which wouldn't look out of place in an Inspector Clouseau film - and also depicts probably one of the unluckiest first days in a job ever!Come and see the Drunk Women LIVE at The Clapham Grand on 15th December 2020, with guests: Kate Thornton & Michelle de Swarte - for information and tickets, visit: claphamgrand.com AND check-out DWSC's brand new Patreon page, where you can find extra content, videos, ad free eps and more : patreon.com/drunkwomensolvingcrime See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Colin Jost Of 'SNL' Knows You're Laughing At His 'Very Punchable Face' Listen to this episode of Backstage Pass with Colin Jost the top writer for SNL and the lucky guy that has Scarlett Johansson's heart. Jost's new memoir, A Very Punchable Face, describes his experiences growing up in a middle-class household on Staten Island. He talks about living in NYC in the midst of the pandemic and talks his days attending Harvard with Mark Zukerberg. Jost recalls being one of the first users on Facebook and opens up about how in most cases an Ivy League education is over rated.  Saturday Night Live's Colin Jost knows there's something about his clean-cut image that rubs some people the wrong way. When he joined SNL as a writer in 2005, he worked off-camera — and didn't have to think about his looks. Colin admits that his favorite sketch on SNL so far has been Drunk Uncle that he wrote for Bobby Moynihan.  In his new book, which is a NY Times best seller, Jost has a chapter about Donald Trumps appearance on SNL prior to him being elected President in November of 2015. Listen to the Podcast to find out what Jost said about our commander and chief.  Colin Jost may be best known for his role as the lead anchor for Weekend Update. He let us know that the crew will be back live at Rockefeller Plaza LIVE for Saturday Night again in late September. The newly engaged Colin Jost talks wedding bells and first dance song selection for his upcoming wedding with Scarlett Johansson.  To listen to more interviews with Gentry Thomas click HERE: https://thepodcastplayground.com/podcast/backstage-with-gentry-thomas/ See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Colin Jost Of 'SNL' Knows You're Laughing At His 'Very Punchable Face' Listen to this episode of Backstage Pass with Colin Jost the top writer for SNL and the lucky guy that has Scarlett Johansson's heart. Jost's new memoir, A Very Punchable Face, describes his experiences growing up in a middle-class household on Staten Island. He talks about living in NYC in the midst of the pandemic and talks his days attending Harvard with Mark Zukerberg. Jost recalls being one of the first users on Facebook and opens up about how in most cases an Ivy League education is over rated.  Saturday Night Live's Colin Jost knows there's something about his clean-cut image that rubs some people the wrong way. When he joined SNL as a writer in 2005, he worked off-camera — and didn't have to think about his looks. Colin admits that his favorite sketch on SNL so far has been Drunk Uncle that he wrote for Bobby Moynihan.  In his new book, which is a NY Times best seller, Jost has a chapter about Donald Trumps appearance on SNL prior to him being elected President in November of 2015. Listen to the Podcast to find out what Jost said about our commander and chief.  Colin Jost may be best known for his role as the lead anchor for Weekend Update. He let us know that the crew will be back live at Rockefeller Plaza LIVE for Saturday Night again in late September. The newly engaged Colin Jost talks wedding bells and first dance song selection for his upcoming wedding with Scarlett Johansson.  To listen to more interviews with Gentry Thomas click HERE: https://thepodcastplayground.com/podcast/backstage-with-gentry-thomas/          See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Twitter @flystewie https://twitter.com/flystewie If you want to support the podcast click below :) https://anchor.fm/flystewie/support Quick Channel Summary Hey I'm @Flystewie

Batman V Superman was an incredibly divisive film. People tend to love it or hate it, and always with passion. I'm excited to look back on this movie as part of my journey through the DC Extended Universe (DCEU). Love it or hate it, there's one thing we can all agree on with this movie - there's plenty to talk about. So much, in fact, that I had to split this discussion into two podcasts. So today we cover part 1, up until the explosion in the senate building. Next week (yes, just one week) we'll continue with the rest of the film. ----more---- Transcript   Welcome to Nerd Heaven I’m Adam David Collings, the author of Jewel of The Stars And I am a nerd This is episode 28 of the podcast Today I’m continuing my look at the DC extended universe with Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice. And I am, of course, talking about the ultimate edition.Because what other version would you watch?   The description on IMDB reads Fearing that the actions of Superman are left unchecked, Batman takes on the Man of Steel, while the world wrestles with what kind of a hero it really needs. The movie was written by Chris Terrior and David S. Goyer. It was directed by Zach Snyder And it first released on the 23rd of March 2016.   As always, this podcast contains full spoilers for the movie, So let’s talk about Batman v superman   The poetic voiceover that opens the movie tells us right away that this is going to be a more literary movie than we might have been expecting. This movie starts in a familiar place. With the murder of Bruce wayne’s parents. As all movies that introduce a new Batman do. While we’ve seen this many times before, this was totally the right way to start. Because this moment in Bruce’s life is what this movie, thematically, is all about.   The intercutting between the murder itself and Bruce running away during the funeral and finding the cave beneath his family’s estate, while the incredible music by Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL plays, is very very effective. Yes, just like the last one, this movie has an incredible soundtrack.   As young Bruce is carried upward by the bats, it’s clear that this is very symbolic. Another indication that this is going to be a deeper movie than the average popcorn superhero flick.   Bruce is carried upward toward the light, a light that he refers to as a beautiful lie. Perhaps because Bruce lives his life in darkness and isn’t really capable of believing that there is any light in this world.   Then we jump forward to the climactic battle during Man of Steel, and see those terrible events from Bruce Wayne’s perspective, which I think was a truly inspired choice. And already, I’m loving this version of Bruce Wayne. This is a Billionaire CEO who runs headlong into danger because his employees are at risk. He cares about his people. Having seen so many examples of the stereotypical evil business manager, I love this!  This scene is an important counterpoint to the equivalent scene in Man of Steel, because we get to see it all happen from the perspective of a normal person, well, as normal as Bruce Wayne can be. He’s seeing an alien invasion. He’s seeing two inhuman creatures of incredible power having a fight which is destroying the city. Brue is seeing the human cost firsthand. He’s seeing the ordinary people that are getting hurt as a consequence of the conflict between Kal-El and Zod. Man of Steel did a good job of demonstrating consequences, but this scene takes it orders of magnitude further. Seriously, the devastation of this attack must have bankrupted the economy of Metropolis. Bruce is truly heroic. And he comes within millimetres of death when he dives under the falling metal to save that little girl. When he asks her where her mum is, and she points up at the destroyed building, Our hearts break.   But as Bruce looks up, from the rubble of the destroyed lives, he sees those two aliens, still gripped in battle, smashing through buildings, his eyes burn with righteous anger. Earth never asked for these aliens to come here. Look at all the devastation they’ve caused. But we see that devastation most strongly, not in the skyscrapers, one after another that continue to fall, but in the eyes of one little girl who will never again see her mother. This is powerful stuff. And I have to say that Ben Affleck’s acting is wonderful in this moment. That look he gives Superman and Zod. It says so much. A lot of people were concerned about Ben Affleck playing Batman. This is nothing new. People seem to doubt every new actor that gets announced to play Batman. Well, it didn’t take long for Mr. Affleck to put aside people’s doubts. He was a fantastic Bruce Wayne, and he was a fantastic Batman. But we’ll talk more about that as we move through the story.   18 months later. It’s not surprising that the wreckage of the world engine in the Indian Ocean would be an area of great interest to tourists. Especially divers. But also to those hoping to find advanced technology. And that’s how we are introduced to Kryptonite. There was some present on the ship. Makes sense. This alien mineral probably played an important part in the terraforming process, or maybe it powered the ship.   Now we’re in Nairomi Africa. And we meet the DCEU’s version of Jimmy Olsen. He’s not in the movie for long. In fact, his identity was never even established in the theatrical cut, but I had my suspicions.    This is a very different take on Jimmy. We quickly learn that he’s not just a photographer. He’s actually a CIA agent.    There is a civil war in this country. America is neutral. But men of power obey neither policy or principal, the terrorist leader says. No one is neutral.   Jimmy is discovered. He’s here to propose something to the terrorists, but before he can make his offer, he’s shot. So much for Jimmy Olsen. You couldn’t dream up a more unconventional version of the character. I did notice Jimmy’s absence from Man of Steel. I wonder if they thought he just didn’t fit in with this more serious version of Superman. I mean, the problem with Jimmy is, he’s even more nerdy than Clark. This version is a tough as nails spy. I don’t mind that change, but I’d have liked to have seen a lot more of him.   Apparently, the Americans were planning an attack on these terrorists, but the surviving guys on the ground are trying to call it off because there are civilians in the area. Not just Lois, but locals. This whole sequence is an exciting way to re-introduce us to Lois, and show us just how tough she is, and maybe how fearless, even reckless, she’s becoming since she met Superman, but it is very important to the story later on. The teactrical cut majorly dropped the ball on this. So much was lost that none of it made sense.   For some reason, the attack wasn’t called off, but Superman prevents the missile, saving Lois and the other civilians in the area.   But in saving these innocents, Superman allowed the terrorists to live. And a lot of other innocents got killed in the crossfire of the subsequent battle. A woman named Kahina Ziri is raising awareness of this.   Senator Finch says, The world has been so caught up with what Superman can do, nobody has asked what he should do. And that’s a very valid question.   She’s holding Superman responsible for these deaths. He took it upon himself to intervene in this situation, but did his actions make things better or worse? Superman has incredible powers. That’s a huge responsibility. He can’t know what all the consequences are of every action he takes. Yet taking those actions is so easy for him. It’s a dangerous position to be in. Quite a scary one, to be honest. There’s a LOT riding on his shoulders. He can’t afford to make a misstep. Can you imagine living with that kind of pressure?   In the next scene, we get to see Batman in action. This movie presents a Batman who is older and more established. He’s been Batman for a long time. We’ve never seen a Batman so established on screen before, and I was all for it. We’d just come off the Dark Knight trilogy. A series that showed us Batman’s early career. There was no need to go and re-visit all that again. This was something new and interesting. And it made sense that Batman had been active as a small-time vigilante for a long time. Not yet famous. He hasn’t yet made a major impact on the world.  This movie takes Batman up to a whole new level. By the end, he’ll be a hero concerned with the fate of the world, not just local crime in Gotham. We also get to see that this older hardened batman is quite harsh. He brands crooks with his mark. Ouch! This is not a Batman you want to be on the wrong side of. This is the classic Batman who is pursued by the police just as much as the villains he battles against.   Lois finds a bullet embedded in her notebook, from the terrorist attack. I like how this movie gives all our characters their own quests. It takes a while, but they all link up and weave into one story. Lois and Clark are well established as a couple that are very much in love. When I first saw this I was surprised by that. In the previous movie, we saw Clark and Lois kiss for the first time, after they’d been through a lot. They were at the very beginning of a mutual attraction that might lead to a relationship over time. I thought we’d see that relationship develop. Instead, it all happened off screen. Looking back, I realise this was the right decision. It’s been 18 months. This wasn’t insta-love. We just didn’t see it all happen. And we don’t need to see the angst of Clark slowly wearing Lois down over time. Been there. Done that. Much better to just have them together so we can tell a story about two people in an established mature relationship.   Clark doesn’t care what people say about him. He did what he believes was right to protect the woman he loves. Despite what people are saying, he didn’t kill anyone.  Lois is concerned. Something doesn’t add up and she wants to know the truth. Because she’s Lois Lane. There’s a cute moment where they’re all serious and then Clark gives Lois a look, and she gives him a look, and he jumps in the bath with her. It’s a fun moment between a loving couple. To those critics who say this movie was devoid of anything light, happy, optimistic, or humorous, I would just point you straight to this scene. At this moment, Clark and Lois are very happy. And yes. Superman smiles. Honestly, I don’t know when it became gospel that the way to judge a Superman movie was how much the man smiles, but this movie has him smile when it’s appropriate.   We meet Alfred. And once again, this is a very different interpretation of the character than what we’ve seen on screen before. Jeremy Irons plays a strong battle-hardened Alfred who is equally capable of keeping up with Batman in the fight against crime as he is in serving drinks to Bruce Wayne. I really like this Alfred. Not just because he’s capable, but he serves as Bruce’s moral conscience. At least, he tries to. So very different from Michael Caine’s portrayal in the Dark Knight Trilogy (which I also loved). That was more of a father figure. You don’t mess with perfection. You do something different. Something equally cool. And Alfred speaks gibberish into Batman’s voice distorter to test it. Again this is a nice comedic moment. See, this movie DOES have humour in it. This moment made me laugh out loud. It’s …. Such a British moment. We aussies appreciate the British sense of humour, but I suspect the American critics who trashed this movie don’t. But this is how I like my humour. Fitting naturally into the story, where and when it is appropriate. It doesn’t feel forced or fake. Bruce is investigating someone called the White Portugeuse.   Alfred is concerned that Batman is becoming too violent. Too cruel, after seeing the branding in a newspaper article.   Brue points out that they’re criminals. They always have been. And this is true. Batman is a vigilante. He operates outside of the law. That’s a crime. Now you can argue that in a city like Gotham, where a corrupt police force is incapable of protecting the citizens from especially heinous crime bosses, that Batman is necessary. But we do need to acknowledge that Batman is a criminal. I kinda like the way Bruce owns this reality here. But things have changed. Alfred has seen the way Bruce has hardened since Superman appeared. Since the battle over metropolis. He talks about the rage that is slowly building in Bruce. That turns good men cruel. This line is thematically important to the movie.This whole idea of good men becoming bad is a major idea explored by the story. Here, Alfred is specifically talking about Bruce. There’s no denying his anger is making him more cruel than he used to be.   And now we meet our new Lex Luthor. And yet again, this is a very different interpretation of Lex. And while many people, even some who liked this movie, hated Jessie Eisenburg’s Lex, I have to say, I’m with it. This is a modern Lex Luthor. This is a young millennial business tycoon. This Lex has often been likened to Mark Zukerberg, the creator and CEO of Facebook. It’s a version of Lex that works in today’s world. But it doesn’t take long to see that Lex, while brilliant, is a little unhinged. And scarily, he’s the one in possession of the Kryptonite that was discovered in the wreckage of the world engine.   They tested the Kyptonite one General Zod’s corpse. They know it is lethal to Kryptonians. Lex has some reasonable things to say here. They’ve just survived an alien invasion. The only reason that humanity isn’t extinct is because Superman saved them. Now what if there’s more Kryptonians out there? What if there are other powerful beings or meta-humans, as he calls them. To be honest, humanity would be insanely foolish not to be looking for ways to defend themselves after their last encounter. Yes, Superman has proven himself a friend to earth (although Lex doesn’t believe this) but you don’t put all your eggs in one basket. If they have a weapon of their own, they don’t have to rely on “the kindness of monsters” as Lex puts it. And it’s hard to argue with that. What if something happens to Superman and he can no longer protect us? Or what if, God-forbid, we need to be protected from HIM? Can we rely on the goodness of Superman? Some fans are offended that we’d even ask that question. But I think this movie does a great job of examining the goodness of Superman, and we’ll talk lots about this as we go,because I have some things to say. Lex wants access to the crashed Kryptonian spaceship. He wants Zod’s body. And we get another iconic piece of music - The red capes are coming.   We meet a man, Wallace Keefe, who has lost both of his legs,his wife, and his child, in the Kryptonian invasion. I love the monument with the names of all those who died in the attack, and the big statue of Superman. Wallace climbs the statue and desecrates it with spray paint. He paints the words False God on Superman’s chest. This is an interesting statement.  Is Superman a God? Is he a false God? He is a being of immense power. But he is not a perfect being. He has flaws. He has the same human brokenness that exists in all of us. It could be argued that he IS a false god, but then, Superman has never claimed to be any kind of god.   We see journalist Clark Kent at work in his office at the daily planet. Perry has assigned him a sports story based on a recent football game between Metropolis and Gotham.   We learn that Gotham is over the other side of the bay from Metropolis. I had never expected these two iconic fictional cities would be so close to one another. But for the purposes of this story, it works. And the interesting thing about this is that Metropolis is the place where the well off live. The professionals. Gotham is the darker seedier place. The wrong side of the train tracks, so to speak. I find this very interesting.   Despite his brief from Perry, Clark has no interest in pursuing this football story. He’s got more important fish to fry. In Gotham. He’s looking for Kahina Ziri. He wants to talk to her about her accusations against Superman.  It seems some people, even good people, are afraid of Batman. There’s a new kind of mean in him, one man says.   Perry’s sarcasm regarding Clark’s newfound interest in the Batman vigilante was pretty funny. Clark takes his role as a journalist just as seriously as he takes his role as Superman. He says to Perry “when you assign a story, you’re making a choice about who matters, and who’s worth it.” Perry is much more pragmatic about it. He just wants to sell newspapers.   Lois has been investigating that bullet. Turns out it’s from an advanced military weapon, so how did these backyard rebels get the latest high-grade military equipment. She thinks the US government are arming the rebels while claiming to support the elected government. She’s on her way to Washington to investigate.   Senator Finch comes to see Lex. She’s blocking the import license for the kryptonite. She sees it as a weapon of assascination, not a deterrent. He fails to convince her that “the red capes are coming.” Demons come from the sky. I think he really believes that. I think in his own way, he thinks he’s right in what he’s doing.   Bruce dreams of visiting his parent’s tomb. We get our second reminder that his mother’s name was Martha. Yeah, we’ll get to that. Bruce doesn’t live in the Wayne family manor. He lives in a modern home. And he’s connected the White Portugause to Lex Luthor. And luckily enough, he’s been invited to a charity event at Lex’s place. And that’s where we see Robin’s suit, with “The Joke’s on you Batman” painted on it. This was a cool little set-up that we’re sadly unlikely to see ever payed off at this point. Most people assumed this suit belonged to Jason Todd, who was killed by the Joker in the comics. Zack Snyder has since confirmed that it was actually Dick Grayson. David Ayer actually had some nice little backstory regarding this, that never really made it into Suicide Squad.   Clark is covering the same charity event that Bruce is attending. We get our first glimpse of Wonder Woman, who is also there. I love the look she gives Lex as he tells the story of Zeus. It’s priceless. Lex, of course, think Zeus was just an ancient legend. Woman Woman is thinking, ‘that’s my dad you’re talking about.’ Alfred is guiding Bruce through the building, looking for information to connect him to the illegal weapons imports, and Clark, of course, can hear it. Clark basically knows, from this point, that Bruce is Batman. Alfred is like a worried father, wanting Bruce to settle down and provide some grandchildren. His comments have elicited yet another audible laugh from me. Lex isn’t a good public speaker. Being rich doesn’t necessarily make you eloquent. But money does allow the unhinged to be re-classified as eccentric. Then we finally see Clark Kent and Bruce Wayne meet. I think it’s kind of cool that their first meeting is in their secret identities. This scene nicely demonstrates the vast ideological difference between these two men. Clark is taking a very righteous, almost self-righteous stance against Batman. Bruce sees this is hypocritical, given the way they praise Superman - an alien, who, if he wanted to, could burn the whole place down. Bruce and Lex have something in common. They’re both nervous about somebody with Superman’s powers being out there. It’s a theme that was explored a lot in the previous movie, but that doesn’t mean it’s fully resolved. Oh, Superman has proven himself, don’t get me wrong. But  it’s completely believable to me that people would still be nervous about him. This movie does a good job of exploring why. And I love the joker reference where Bruce points out Gotham has a bad history with freaks dressed as clowns. I never thought to compare Superman with the Joker, but I get it. Clark isn’t able to see what Bruce is really up to because Superman is needed to help save people from a factory fire in South America.    So Superman saves the day, to the wonderful Man of Steel theme by Zimmer. And we see the veneration these people have for him as they reach out to touch him. This is another little Jesus metaphor. Reminds me of the woman who wanted to touch Jesus’ cloak so as to be healed. Superman doesn’t look overly happy about this veneration.   Dianna has stolen the data that Bruce extracted from Lex’s computer.   We get a segment with a bunch of talking heads. Most, if not all, are real life personalities. It jumps between them all, with a whole lot of different opinions, and I think that’s the main takeaway here. Everyone has their opinion. As one puts it, “is it surprising that a man of this power would be a topic of controversy?” Another points out, “maybe he’s not a devil OR a Jesus figure. Maybe he’s just a guy trying to do the right thing.”   Senator Finch has some real concerns over Superman, and the way he’s making decisions and interventions that affect the whole world. He’s not controlled by any government. He’s a god-like alien with no accountability. But what do you say to those whose children Superman could have saved, but we told him not to? Finch isn’t saying Superman shouldn’t act, but that he shouldn’t act unilaterally.   And Clark is watching all of this, taking it in. Just like everyone else, he’s trying to figure out where he fits in the world. To what level should he act? So he does what any wise person would do. He calls his Mum. He’s not looking for specific advice, he just wants to talk.   We get to see that Lois also has a sense of idealism, though maybe not as strong as Clark’s. The scientist testing her bullet is “this is why you’re a great reporter. Stuff like this still shocks you.”   Meanwhile, Clark is learning that batman’s brand is a death sentence in jail. Many feel Batman is going too far. To be honest, I’m not sure why the crooks in jail kill anyone with a bat brand. What obligates them to do Batman’s dirty work for him?   Lex comes to visit the Wallace. Now, in a nice suit and an electric wheelchair, he goes to meet Senator Finch. He blames Superman for his situation and he wants to face him.   And now we get to see General Swanwick, from Man of Steel. His opinion is that  Lois went where she shouldn’t have. Superman acted like a rogue combatant to rescue her, and some people died. Don’t invent a conspiracy to put back his halo, or yours. But this doesn’t address Lois’s evidence. She admits that she made a mistake going into the desert. She got people killed. It keeps her awake. But she doesn’t believe Superman is bad, and she doesn’t think Swanwick does either. He agrees to take the bullet and pursue this himself.   Clark really doesn’t care what Perry instructs him to do. He’s refused two stories he’s been assigned. Clark is on a crusade for justice against the Batman. He thinks the Daily Planet should stand for something. Perry’s perspective is that principles don’t exist anymore. It’s not 1938 anymore. The world is a harsher place. It’s all about the money now. This is an interesting little meta-commentary on the fact that Superman has changed. Superman was created in 1938. The character has certainly changed from then to now. This appears to be a not-so-subtle statement from the filmmakers that this is a different type of Superman for the times. Deal with it.   Turns out Dianna wasn’t interested in all Bruce’s data, she just wanted a photo that Lex had. She returns the drive. And as Briuce starts to look at the data, he has a vision. This is the nightmare sequence, the source of much confusion in many a movie-goer. I’m not going to pretend to fully understand all of it myself. I’m not a comic book expert, but the more you know the comics, the more you’ll understand. We’re clearly seeing a dystopian future. The music and the visual make that clear very quickly. Batman is trying to secure some Kryptonite from Lexcorp. But it’s a trap. A bunch of storm-trooper style soldiers with Superman logos on their arms try to kill Batman. In this future, Superman has gone evil, he has neo-nazi thugs working for him, and flying aliens rule the world. Once he’s captured, Bruce is visited by Superman. The soldiers bow in reverence to him. And he’s looking pretty mean. He ruthlessly murders people with his heat vision. “She was my world, and you took her from me.” Superman says before he kills bruce. And then Bruce wakes up. A weird bearded Flash warns him that Lois Lane is the key. You were right about him, you’ve always been right about him.  This is the Flash sending a message back through time from the future. Trying to prevent that nightmare future. But the message has gone back to a point in time too early. Before Bruce even knows The Flash. Honestly I don’t think you need to understand all this to appreciate it. It’s a tease. It’s setting up cool stuff for the future. Now you can criticise this “evil Superman” all you want, but this stuff is straight from the comics. Superman hasn’t just decided to go bad. From what we’ve heard, Zack Snyder intended that this was a Superman who was being mind-controlled by Darkseid using the anti-life equation. He hasn’t just abandoned all reason because the woman he loved died. I have zero problems with this stuff.   But I wonder if we’ll get a decent payoff to all of this in the Snyder Cut of Justice league coming out next year?   The data on the drive reveals that the white portugeuse is a ship. Turns out Bruce has known more about this than he’s let on to Alfred. This is the ship that is smuggling the kryptonite to Lex. Bruce wants to intercept it. To use it. He’s actively considering killing Superman with it. Bruce says, look at the dead. This guy brought the war two years ago. If there’s even a 1 percent chance that this guy could turn on us then we have to take it as a 100% certainty and take him out.   Bruce doesn’t want to see Superman become a threat, and look back, wishing he’d done something to prevent it. He has the means to stop Superman. And honestly, that vision the Flash sent him, has only served to make him even more fearful of Superman. Because he’s seen a glimpse of that future. He HAS to prevent it from becoming a reality. That’s why the nightmare sequence is important to the movie. It directly impacts Bruce’s motivations. Alfred is convinced Superman is not our enemy. Not today, Bruce agreed, but what about the future? How many good guys are left? He asks. How many stayed that way. This line is interesting. I think this might be the reason for some theories that were popular, at one point, in the internet, that rather than being killed by the joker, Robin actually became the joker. That would make the message “The joke’s on your Batman” even more powerful. But it seems this wasn’t actually the plan.   Somebody has sent photos to Clark of the victims of Batman’s brand. And it makes him angry. The police won’t tell Clark what happened to the inmate who died, but a sympathetic cop nods him in the direction of the inmate's widow. “One man decides who lives and who dies. How is that justice?” She asks. But that’s what others are asking about Superman. He has the power to influence our lives, but does he have the moral right to make those decisions for himself?   Clark’s cover for never being where he’s supposed to be, in this version, is simply that he’s not a good employee. He’s always pursuing his own stuff against orders. This makes it work. It’s more believable than versions where he’s one of the paper’s star reporters, Perry’s golden boy. It’s hard to show true dedication to your job and be Superman at the same time. We really do get some decent Clark stuff in this movie. There’s been surprisingly little Superman. Most we’ve seen of the character has been as Clark, investigating the Batman.   Batman goes to the ship to steal the kryptonite.And we get to see the new batmobile in action for the first time. This new batmobile is a tank of a thing. Armoured and armed with machine guns. Super high tech. It’s the perfect vehicle for this older more established Batman. It’s really cool. But superman is there to interfere. Makes sense. He’s been investigating batman this whole time. Now he sees Batman is out and about causing mayhem. So he goes to stop him. And he gives Batman a verbal warning. “Next time they shine your light in the sky, don’t go to it. The bat is dead. Bury it.” Batman failed to get the kryptonite, but he managed to put a tracker on the truck. Now he knows where Lex is holding it.   Finch asks the question “How do we determine what’s good?” and she invites Superman to come and meet the people who say they suffered in that desert. The world needs to know what happened. To know what he stands for. How far will he take his power? Does he act by our will or by his own? These are not totally unreasonable questions.   Meanwhile, Martha encourages him with her perspective. “They see what you do and they know who you are. You’re not a killer, a threat.” Superman’s actions speak for him. The fruit of his life, if you like. He may not be perfect, but he’s not an enemy of this world. She tells him to be this world’s hero, or don’t be. You don’t owe this world anything. You never did. It’s not out of some kind of obligation that Superman does the things he does. He doesn’t help others because he owes them. He does things out of love. Love for humanity. Love for strangers, because he sees value in people and he chooses to help them. That’s what love has always been. A choice.   At this point the truth starts to come out. First of all, struck with a guilty conscience, Kahina Ziri goes to Finch and reveals that she didn’t tell the truth. She lied to set Superman up. Then General Swanwick confirms to Lois that It’s a setup. Someone wanted Superman to look guilty. The bullet Lois found was developed by a private company. Lexcorp. He had private contractors at the desert compound. Lex Luthor is setting Superman up. Trying to destroy his reputation.   Lois wants to run the story immediately. Superman needs to know he’s being set up because it might affect what he says to the senators. But Perry is afraid of litigation. And I don’t blame him. As he says, without proof, Lex could sue the Daily Planet out of existence.   Wallace is an employee of Bruce Wayne. Bruce has been taking good care of him, because he cares about those who work for him. But the cheques are all returned with aggressive messages.   Lex keeps saying that the oldest lie in America is that power can be innocent. He truly believes in the old saying that power corrupts. Therefore, a being with Superman’s power cannot be good. And he has Ziri murdered so she can’t tell the truth. Lex is conspicuously absent from his seat in the hearing. Finch finds a little message he left behind for her, referencing an earlier conversation. And then the wheelchair explodes, taking out the senate building.

Technology affects everything today, and we must have an informed discussion about it. Join Mint's Prasid Banarjee @undertecher as he discusses everything from Black Lives Matter to reports of increased domestic violence cases and the role of social media in our lives right now. 

Olá a todos e sejam bem vindos ao décimo primeiro episódio do podcast Rodas Velozes. Semanalmente estamos sempre trazendo novidades do mundo esportivo e das modalidades sobre rodas. Este episódio é com o party animal das competições inline. Éder Lopes Moraes fala com o Rodas Velozes diretamente de Miami. Inscreva-se no nosso canal no Spotfy, Deezer, Google cast e sua plataforma de áudio favorita. E mande uma mensagem para nós. Estamos no YouTube, Facebook e Instagram sempre com perfil @rodasvelozes Toda quarta-feira tem um episódio novo esse fantástico mundo da patinação de velocidade.

Créer une audience est un challenge ambitieux auquel n'importe quel entrepreneur du Web a dû, un jour, faire face. En introduction de cette série de podcasts, je vous ai expliqué pourquoi la stratégie de contenu était, à mon sens, la meilleure stratégie pour créer une audience autour de sa marque, son site… ou simplement sa personne. Toutefois, vous aurez beau créer le meilleur contenu du monde, si personne n'en prend connaissance, les factures non payées risquent de s'accumuler sur votre bureau. Vous avez donc besoin d'une stratégie d'acquisition de trafic.  Dans ce nouvel épisode, je vous présente 3 canaux pour attirer des visiteurs ciblés vers votre site web, afin de commencer à créer une audience autour de votre marque.  Un indice ? Vous n'aurez pas besoin de donner un seul sou à Mark Zukerberg.

“Estando en la Isla Navarino, el lugar más austral del mundo, el estar aburrida era lo mejor que me podía pasar, porque me obligaba a hacer y crear cosas.  Así el patio de mi casa era el bosque y los domingos eran de armar legos en familia.  Y no fue hasta que tuve 8 años, mi papá, que era marino, que trabajaba en el servicio de criptografía de la armada y que además trabajó en el pentágono (una especie de James Bond de Tocopilla) me regaló mi primer computador, un multimedia 486 con disco duro de 500 megas. ¡El disco duro más grande de la isla!  ¡Y todo eso hizo explotar mi mente!  Así que tuve la necesidad de entender cómo funcionaba.  Y lo desarmé,  …..  Mi papá cuando me vio me quería matar.  Le dije que no se preocupara que yo lo armaba de nuevo.  Y me demoré 3 días en armarlo y finalmente cuando apreté el botón ‘Power’, el computador función.  Fue un momento crucial en mi vida, desde ese momento, yo sabía que podía arreglar cualquier cosa”. Cita de Barbarita Lara, Ingeniera de ejecución e informática de la Santa María (una auténtica ‘Sansana’), investigadora, codificadora, emprendedora social y CEO de EMERCOM quien durante la entrevista relata sus inicios como científica loca que quiere conquistar el mundo y que hoy la tiene actualmente trabajando en su propia empresa, donde es su propio jefe y desarrollando el Sistema de Información de Emergencia (SiE) que es un sistema de comunicaciones post catástrofe que permite resolver uno de los más grandes problemas que tenemos los chilenos, que es; ‘¿Cómo nos comunicamos con nuestros seres queridos parientes y amigos después de una catástrofe ya sea terremoto, tsunami o mega incendio, sin usar internet ni redes telefónicas?’   Y nuestro chilito lindo, ustedes concordarán conmigo, es mandado a hacer para las catástrofes naturales.  Y es que después del terremoto del 27/F del 2010, Barbarita consideró que la comunicación entre personas después de una catástrofe debería ser considerado como un derecho humano.  Su trabajo e innovaciones la hicieron Ganadora del “MIT Technology Review, Innovadores menores de 35 años LATAM 2018”, otorgado por la revista más antigua de tecnología del mundo, premio al cual accedió en su momento el mismísimo Mark Zukerberg, y que fija los precedentes para las tecnologías del futuro, seleccionada por su Alteza Real el Príncipe Andrés de York, para presentar el “Pitch at Palace LATAM” en la “Ciudad de las Ideas 2017”, elegida como una de las 100 mujeres líderes, Chilena innovadora del año y Chilena inventora del año 2018 (estos  entre otros reconocimientos). En este apasionante episodio, veremos cómo Barbarita a los 12 años ya les prestaba servicios de internet y electricidad a sus vecinos, su paso oscuro como hacker, de cómo formó su propio grupo de scouts, como se formó en los social, como por ser diferente le hacía bullying en el colegio, nos enseña a como aprender a gestionar el éxito y el fracaso, que ser disruptivo y pensar fuera de la caja, es una fuerza necesaria transformadora de los problemas y que permite encontrar oportunidades, crear nuevos mercados, generar nuevas ideas y ayudar a la humanidad.  Como se generó la creación de SIE hasta obtener su premio en el MIT.    Los dejamos con esta ‘long range conversation’, una entrevista llena de historias relatadas por esta increíble mujer científica, que ha prometido conquistar el mundo y poblar Marte cuando la humanidad ponga pie en el planeta rojo.  Una entrevista intensa, llena de anécdotas y de humor de esta extraordinaria mujer, donde la protagonista es Barbarita Lara. https://www.linkedin.com/in/barbaritalaram/ http://www.emercom.cl/

At lære at tjene penge er det samme som at lære at cykle! Det er en evne som du kan lære. Samfundet lyver for dig og har fyldt dig med løgnen om at du kun kan tjene penge hvis du har en god uddannelse. Det er IKKE sandt! Se på Steve Jobs og Mark Zukerberg, nogle af verdens største indflydelser på jorden og begge to var drop outs fra skolen. I dagens episode vil jeg ændre din forståelse for penge så du kan slippe din økonomiske stress en gang for alle!

Resilience maybe one of the most needed characteristics of a true leader, but how can we build REAL resilience?We all like to think we are resilient but what happens when we are faced with the kind of adversity that might destroy the average leader. For every boom there is a lull, for every high there is a low. The question is, can you not only survive a personal, financial, or mental crash, and then come back stronger than ever?If you think you can, consider what might happen if you put it to the test?Let’s find out together.What happens when you put a non-criminal and one of the world's top experts in personal growth into one of the toughest prisons in the UK? In 2017, that's exactly what happened to Peter Sage during a civil matter, he was found in contempt of court. What unfolded next has become a masterclass in how to turn adversity to your advantage.Our guest on this episode is a returning champion who has hit the canvas so hard and so often, most people wouldn’t even bother to try and get back up. However, that’s not the case with my mate, Peter Sage.Peter is constantly ranked as one of, if not THE, most engaging and impactful guests, time and again, by hosts around the world. He is a natural on camera or audio. The engagement, feedback and retention of listeners is always explosive. His insights, philosophy and experience make him a rare and unique guest and one that is committed to adding tremendous value.He was named one of the greatest leaders and entrepreneurs of 2015 by Inspiring Leadership Now alongside Sir Richard Branson, Elon Musk and Mark Zukerberg. He's an advisor to the Hungarian Government and is an international No.1 Best Selling Author of a several books including a book I was honoured to write the foreword for, “The Inside Track.”Welcome the Rocky of Entrepreneurship!My mate, Peter Sage.On this episode we go FullMonty on:· Dogs and Cats as teachers· Serving time in prison without ever being convicted of a crime· The choices we’re all presented with to be a Victim or Victor· Growth vs Comfort· Practicing what you preach in extreme circumstances · The real insider track on the prison system· Adventures in Adversity · Conscious Entrepreneurship· The importance of determining our own context · The cure for entitlement· What is the deepest fear we all carry· The first tool of real empowerment · How Your Life is ALREADY a Perfect Expression· Restructuring education· Complacence vs Acceptance · The power of negative contrastMore on Peter Sage here: http:///PeterSage.com To find out more about hiring Dov Baron as a speaker or strategist for your organization: http://fullmontyleadership.com/consulting or http://fullmontyleadership.com/speaking.Remember you can now also find us on iTunes, Spotify, iHeart Radio, or wherever you tune into podcasts.And on traditional radio stations across the US every Monday and Thursday on: 99.5 FM & 1520 AM Las Vegas102.1 FM & 1640 AM Lancaster, Philadelphia87.9 FM & 810 AM Macon, Georgia 92.1 FM & 1630 AM Tampa, Florida97.7 The Villages, Florida96.3 FM Boulder, Colorado90.3 FM Milwaukee, Wisconsin 94.7 FM Pittsburg, Philadelphia87.9 FM Colorado Springs, ColoradoAnd NOW LIVE on 96.7FM WASHINGTON, DC and on 96.7FM covering THE WASHINGTON DC & QUANTICO area.Also, look for us on ROKU TV where there are 100K subscribers. If you are a regular listener, then a big thank-you to you for making us the #1 podcast globally for Fortune 500 listeners! And with a potential reach of 2.5 to 3 million listeners for every show, we’re honored and grateful to be cited in INC.com as The #1 Podcast To Make You a Better Leader See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On va voir ensemble pourquoi il faut que t'arrêtes de croire que tu es le prochain Mark Zukerberg et comment tu peux faire du cash✅ Une méthode de réflexion approuvé par les nouveaux millionnaires✅ Les idées ne font pas tout, tu vas voir pourquoi✅ Ton idée est certainement bien, mais tu es mauvaisUn podcast qui va te remettre en question...Rejoins mes contacts privés : http://bit.ly/31MbjjC

12 septembre 2019, Les Technos Saison 6 épisode 3… ou la 224eme édition de votre rendez-vous hebdomadaire avec une certaine vision de l’actualité technologique. Cette semaine nos chroniqueurs ont épinglé entre autres choses : le Google Play Pass, la présence d’un certain Richard Stallman de passage chez… Microsoft, la Libra, la monnaie de Mark Zukerberg, qui fait des vagues en Suisse, la version US du RGPD (Règlement Général sur la Protection des Données). Et on se pose également une question au surlendemain de l’Appel Event de rentrée : Avons nous fait le tour des smartphones ? Bonne écoute !E comme Drone (00:02:37)L’Ehang 184 s’invite dans une série Netflix. (source, source, source)G comme Google (00:10:07)Google Play Pass serait bientôt disponible. (source)L comme Libra (00:13:12)La Finma doit valider l’arrivée de la Libra. (source, source)L comme Libre (00:19:51)Richard Stallman en conférence chez… Microsoft! (source)R comme RGPD (00:26:12)Un GDPR à la sauce américaine ? (source)S comme Satellite (00:30:17)Petit soucis de mail chez Space X ? (source, source)S comme Smartphones (00:37:47)Avons-nous fait le tour des smartphones ? (source)S comme Social (00:53:32)Uber licencie en masse: 435 employés ont été mis à pied. (source)S comme Social (00:57:13)Uber (et d’autres) pourrait avoir bientôt beaucoup plus d’employés. (source)V comme Van (01:05:32)Une maison de geek sur roues. (source)W comme Wéménon (01:19:05)Le robot ménager a aussi droit à Spotify. (source)En audio ici

12 septembre 2019, Les Technos Saison 6 épisode 3… ou la 224eme édition de votre rendez-vous hebdomadaire avec une certaine vision de l'actualité technologique. Cette semaine nos chroniqueurs ont épinglé entre autres choses : le Google Play Pass, la présence d'un certain Richard Stallman de passage chez… Microsoft, la Libra, la monnaie de Mark Zukerberg, qui fait des vagues en Suisse, la version US du RGPD (Règlement Général sur la Protection des Données). Et on se pose également une question au surlendemain de l'Appel Event de rentrée : Avons nous fait le tour des smartphones ? Bonne écoute !E comme Drone (00:02:37)L'Ehang 184 s'invite dans une série Netflix. (source, source, source)G comme Google (00:10:07)Google Play Pass serait bientôt disponible. (source)L comme Libra (00:13:12)La Finma doit valider l'arrivée de la Libra. (source, source)L comme Libre (00:19:51)Richard Stallman en conférence chez… Microsoft! (source)R comme RGPD (00:26:12)Un GDPR à la sauce américaine ? (source)S comme Satellite (00:30:17)Petit soucis de mail chez Space X ? (source, source)S comme Smartphones (00:37:47)Avons-nous fait le tour des smartphones ? (source)S comme Social (00:53:32)Uber licencie en masse: 435 employés ont été mis à pied. (source)S comme Social (00:57:13)Uber (et d'autres) pourrait avoir bientôt beaucoup plus d'employés. (source)V comme Van (01:05:32)Une maison de geek sur roues. (source)W comme Wéménon (01:19:05)Le robot ménager a aussi droit à Spotify. (source)En audio ici Voir Acast.com/privacy pour les informations sur la vie privée et l'opt-out.

wGUEST "Sarah Cobner" On the first half of this episode, you will hear stellar Reversals on Mark Zukerberg, founder of Facebook, acknowledging his commitment to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Then we are joined by Reverse Speech Analyst "Sarah Cobner,' from the other side of the Atlantic, "Jolly Ol' England." Sarah is a brilliant Reverse Speech Analyst whom David and Christian enjoyed speaking with very much. Would you like REVERSE SPEECH RADIO, to investigate a particular topic for an episode that is of specific interest to you? If so, then please feel free to visit or PATREON account, to find out more information, www.patreon.com/REVERSESPEECH REVERSE SPEECH RADIO in association with Reverse Speech.ca and brought to you by Crime & Trauma Scene Cleaners / Crime Scene Cleaners.ca  If you or anyone you know would like to be a guest on REVERSE SPEECH RADIO, and have reversals conducted for FREE, by David John Oates, then please contact me directly at reversespeechradio@gmail.com Reverse Speech is currently being used by the CIA for "Truth Extraction and Deception Monitoring," we know this because we trained them.

Quick Channel Summary Hey I'm @Flystewie

Hello Friends, welcome to Startup Era. Mai hu Sohail Akhter Jo Aapko Is Video Me Batane Wala Hu Mark Zukerberg Ke 7 Success Secrets ko Aur Mark Zukerberg Ke Success Formula... Dosto Mark Zukerberg Facebook K C.EO Aur Founder Hai Ye Bhot Hi Successful Entrepreneur Hai Jo Billions of Dollars Ki Company Khardi Kardi h... Is Video Ko Pura Dekhe Mujhe Ummid Hai Ki Aapko Ye Episode Pasand Ayegi ! Please Subscribe Our Channel @Startup Era

Before computers had proper multitasking support and quick shortcuts for changing apps, playing games when you're not supposed to be could be super risky. But if there's one thing that's been a constant in technology, it's that wherever there are computers, there are also games. And for a while, in the 1980s and 90s, many game developers actually put in a special key command that would bring up a fake productivity screen. This is the story of the rise and fall of the boss button. If you buy Steven Levy's Hackers on Amazon via http://lifeandtimes.games/hackersbook (this link), I get a small percentage of the sale price. (I highly recommend reading the book, if you haven't already — it's a fascinating look into the early computer industry through the eyes of free-thinking and idealistic programmers, with a good bit of backstory as well on the beginnings of Sierra Online.) The Life & Times of Video Games on the Web and social media Website: http://lifeandtimes.games (lifeandtimes.games)Twitter: https://twitter.com/LifeandTimesVG (@LifeandTimesVG)Instagram: @lifeandtimesvgYouTube: http://lifeandtimes.games/youtube (lifeandtimes.games/youtube)You can make a donation to help cover running costs and allow me to rely less on freelance income via Patreon: http://lifeandtimes.games/patreon (lifeandtimes.games/patreon)or PayPal: https://paypal.me/mossrc (paypal.me/mossrc)My book, The Secret History of Mac Gaming, is available in bookstores in the UK and Australia, as well as online from the likes of Book Depository and Amazon. See the https://secrethistoryofmacgaming.com (official website) for more info. Can't afford to give me money? Consider listening via the RadioPublic app for Android or iOS. It's free. And if you enable analytics then I get paid a couple of cents each time you listen to my show. Head to https://radiopublic.com/ (RadioPublic.com) for more info. Support The Life & Times of Video Games Links: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1449388396/lifeandtim07a-20 (Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution: Steven Levy: 9781449388393: Amazon.com: Gateway) — This 25th anniversary edition of Steven Levy's classic book traces the exploits of the computer revolution's original hackers -- those brilliant and eccentric nerds from the late 1950s through the early '80s who took risks, bent the rules, and pushed the world in a radical new direction. With updated material from noteworthy hackers such as Bill Gates, Mark Zukerberg, Richard Stallman, and Steve Wozniak, Hackers is a fascinating story that begins in early computer research labs and leads to the first home computers. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices (podcastchoices.com/adchoices)

Peter Sage Peter Sage, 46, is a leading and well-known international serial entrepreneur with over 20 start-ups to his credit, some of which, such as the Energie fitness brand, have grown into global success stories. He was named one of the greatest leaders and entrepreneurs of 2015 by Inspiring Leadership Now alongside Sir Richard Branson, Elon Musk and Mark Zukerberg and is an international No.1 Best Selling Author. Wesites: SpaceEnergy.com petersage.com  

Hoy hablamos de los candidatos para el 2020 y Maduro, Mark Zukerberg, Jeff Bezos y cerramos con Yalitza Aparicio y los Oscares. Este episodio no se lo pueden perder.  NUESTRAS REDES SOCIALES:   www.elderyjayelshow.com www.facebook.com/elderyjayelshow  www.twitter.com/elderyjayelshow  www.youtube.com  Correo: Elpodcastje@gmail.com  Telefono en el estudio. 281-826 4JYE (4593)  Suscribete en Itunes y Tunein, Stitcher, Mixcloud,   Buscanos en  Facebook, Twitter, Periscope y en nuestro canal de Youtube, o escribenos  a nuestro correo elpodcastje@gmail.com y manda tus mensajes de voz para transmitirlos durante el programa al 281 826 4JYE (593)  Visitanos en www.elderyjayelshow.com  para el blog y otras cosas interesantes. No te quedes atras, informate, diviertete y comparte este episodio. Pasa la voz!!!  Bienvenido al club de Elder y Jay aca en las profundidades de la red!!!  

In this week's episode of the Working With Podcast, I answer a question about making decisions. Links: Email Me | Twitter | Facebook | Website The Beginners Guide To Building Your Own Productivity System Build Your Own Apple Productivity System The Working With… Podcast Previous episodes page Hello and welcome to episode 49 of my Working With Podcast. A podcast created to answer all your questions about productivity, GTD, time management, self-development and goal planning. My name is Carl Pullein and I am your host for this show. This week, I have a wonderful question about the choices we make each day and how to make better choices so we can become better organised and more productive. But, before we get in to the question I would just like to let you all know that my 2018 edition of Build Your Own Apple Productivity system in now available and is on an early-bird discount of $29.99. This course is for those of you in the Apple ecosystem and who don't want the expense of subscriptions and purchases of third-party apps or risk the possibility of an app closing down or being bought out. This course takes you through the steps to build your own COD (collect, organise and do) productivity system using just the Apple productivity apps—Reminders, Notes and Calendar. It's a great course and one that can bullet proof your system and help you to become better organised and more productive. Okay, onto this week's question and that means it's time for me now to hand you over to the mystery podcast live for this week's question: This week's question comes from Karen. Karen asks, I've been trying to implement GTD for a few years now, but I always have problems with all the decisions I have to make. Things like where does this task go? What do I do with this note? And is this a project or a single actions task? Do you have any advice on how to make better decisions? Great question, Karen and a question many people have about getting started with GTD (that's Getting Things Done, a book by David Allen).  GTD does often feel like one big decision making system and that can become overwhelming at times, particularly in the early days of setting up a GTD system. When you have collected all your stuff into your inbox and start processing it. The basic questions to ask about something in your inbox are “what is it?” and “what do I need to do with it to get it done?”. These questions might seem simple enough, but the “what do I need to with it to get it done?” can often lead to multiple decisions that need to be made. Decisions such as: what do I need to do next? And, where do I put this task? Which project does it belong to? or which folder do I put this note in? All these questions and decisions can lead to decision fatigue and that is not good if you want to be performing at your best every day.  So, what do you do?  Well, the best strategy I have with this is to restrict the decisions I have to make. For example, when I am processing my inbox at the end of the day, all I need to decide is if something is work related or personal. If it is work related then it can only be related to a piece of content I am working on or related to a client or student I am working with.  Now here is where the problem most commonly appears. If you have your productivity set up as a mix of active projects, someday/maybe projects and areas of focus you are essentially giving yourself far too many decisions to make. When you process everything you have collected you are going to be faced with too many questions. Questions such as “is this related to a project?” or “is this related to an area of focus”. Where can I do this task?, Do I need to talk to someone? If so, who? Etc.  A better way to reduce the number of decisions you need to make is to choose to go with a system focused on your areas of focus such as “manager”, family, hobbies and interests. What I have found is when we create organisation structures around our areas of focus it is far easier to make decisions about what something is related to. For example, if I need to do a student evaluation, that obviously comes under my roll as a teacher. If I need to talk to my wife about an upcoming trip, then that task comes under my area of family. It also means I never have to decide whether something is a project or a single action all I have to decide is what roll something is related to.  What I have found in the past is anything could be described as a project in GTD terms. In GTD a project is anything that requires two or more steps to complete. Sounds simple enough, but making an appointment to see the dentist could arguably be described as a project because there is more than one step required. Find a time to go to dentist, find dentist's number, call dentist and make appointment, go to dentist for appointment. That's three or four steps. So, that means in strict GTD terms, that's a project. But in reality, how long would it take to make an appointment to see your dentist? Probably less than two minutes. So just get your phone, call your dentist and make the appointment. Job done. For me, I have a recurring date in my calendar set for every six months to make a dentist appointment. It's not in my to-do list at all. I see the reminder on my calendar, “make appointment for dental checkup” I pick up my phone and call the dentist and make the appointment.  Decision fatigue is real. We are having to make decisions all the time. This is why often at the end of a day we find it difficult to decide what to eat for dinner. I must admit, I take this to an extreme. I eat the same thing for breakfast, lunch and dinner Sunday to Thursday and allow myself freedom to eat whatever I want on a Friday and Saturday. Not only do I find this is better for my health—I make sure I eat only healthy foods Sunday to Thursday—it also means I have no decisions to make about what to eat. (It helps that I am not a foodie) I also exercise at the same time each day, and I plan out my exercise schedule for the week when I do my weekly review. This means I do not have to make any decisions during the week about when i will exercise and what kind of exercise I will do.  Building routines and buying the same types of groceries is another way to help reduce the decisions you have to make too. I buy the same ground coffee from Starbucks each week (Kenyan) for my morning cup of coffee. I also buy the same English tea from the same company—Yorkshire Tea from the British Corner Shop (an online expats shopping service) I wake up at the same time each day and follow a set routine. Spend the first hour of the day studying Korean. As these are baked in routines, no decision has to be made. They just happen.  The key here is to find ways of reducing the decisions you have to make by building routines around your daily activities. If you follow my advice about doing a daily ten minute planning session at the end of the day, then fix that at a set time each day. For me, I do my Golden Ten between 10:30 and 10:45pm Sunday to Thursday. Again, I keep Friday and Saturday free to be able to go out with my friends and family or to just relax on the sofa and enjoy a good old British drama. Once something has become a routine, you no longer have to make decisions about it.  Creating routines and buying the same type of groceries each week may sound boring, but I have found it makes my life much simpler. I buy my jeans, sweaters and t-shirts from the same companies. This means when I decide I want to buy a new sweater, all I have to do is go to N Peal of London and make a decision on colour and style. If I did not have a favoured sweater supplier, I would have to search around for a company that makes the type of sweater I want, I would then have to decide which size to buy and check they deliver to Korea. To me that's such a waste of time and decision making. Instead, I use the same company, I know my sizes there and the only decision I need to make really is what style. (I generally like navy blue and grey colours for sweaters)  The trick is to look for things that can be turned in to routines and habits and then turn them in to routines and habits. Once you have that achieved, you no longer need to make decisions about them. I can give you more examples where I use this method. If I go to a coffee shop, I always order a capucchno. If I go on a business trip abroad I always stay in the same hotel brand (Holiday Inn or Holiday Inn Express) I generally fly using the same airline (Korean Air) and all my electronic devices are Apple. This just means when I need to fly somewhere I only have to search one airline site, if I need a new phone or computer I only have to decide which Apple device to buy, and if I need to stay in another city, Holiday Inn is most likely to have a hotel in that city. It's simple, easy and because I use the same companies like Korean Air and Holiday Inn, I get reward points and receive very good discounts.  All the decisions we have to make on a daily basis is a consequence of the wonderful world we live in today. We have a lot of choices and that is great. But as individuals it is up to us to reduce the decisions we make each day by building set routines and where possible using the same companies that offer the kind of services or products we like and trust. Doing this will help you reduce the decisions you need to make each day and it will prevent you from suffering from decision fatigue. I should point out you don't have to take this to the extremes Steve Jobs did or Mark Zukerberg does today by wearing the same clothes each day. Although it is a good idea to decide what you will wear the next day the night before. That can really help reduce decision making, you don't have to wear the same clothes every day… No really! When I hope that answers your question, Karen and thank you for sending in your question. Don't forget, it for have a question you would like answering, then please get in touch either by email (carl@carlpullein.com) or via Twitter or Facebook. All the links are in the show notes. Thank you very much for listening to this episode of the Working With Podcast. It just remains for me now to wish you all a very very productive week.   

This week Jon, Clive & Tony speak to Chairperson of UK Holocaust Memorial Day Trust, Laura Marks OBE about a letter she's co-signed to Facebook founder & CEO, Mark Zukerberg, urging him to remove Holocaust denial content from his site. Richard Benson OBE tells us why he and founder of 'TellMAMA' Fiyaz Mughal have joined forces to tackle hate crime. Jewish Author Jemma Wayne on why she has reimagined a Hindu text into a book for children. News Editor Justin Cohen reviews The Jewish News and our Rabbinic Thought for the Week comes from Rabbi Stephen Katz of Edgware & Hendon Reform Synagogue.

Episode 221: Adam Banks and Amber talk about Mark Zukerberg losing $16 Billion in 5 min, Pedophilia in the world, Demi Lovato drug overdose and more.

Hoy vamos a darle una vuelta de tuerca a la idea de utilizar una red social como Facebook de plataforma donde formar a nuestros estudiantes online. No hay ninguna duda de que Facebook es una impresionante plataforma social, pero ¿podríamos considerarla lo suficientemente flexible para nuestro propósito? Así que, en este programa, descubriremos 4 pros y 4 contras del uso de Facebook para elearning y veremos con 9 consejos prácticos cómo aprovecharnos de su potencial. Dadle un vistazo al anterior capítulo del podcast donde ya vimos algunas de las características del social learning, sus aplicabilidades y donde ya mencionamos la red social de Mark Zukerberg que hoy vamos a tratar en detalle. Cómo utilizar Facebook en elearning. Un punto de partida Como bien conocéis, Facebook es un sitio de redes sociales cada vez más popular que nos ayuda a mantenernos en contacto con nuestros amigos y familiares. A la par de mantenernos al día con noticias y eventos. Y aunque no se ideó como una herramienta educativa, la creación de grupos de formación, el intercambio de contenidos de aprendizaje y la participación en debates online relacionados, podría validarnos la idea de por qué aprovecharla. La naturaleza de esta red social facilita la formación online, ya que hace que sea particularmente fácil para los estudiantes no solo conectarse y establecer relaciones con sus compañeros virtuales, sino también intercambiar conocimientos y habilidades. Ahora vamos a ver las dos caras de la moneda. Como esta plataforma nos beneficia, pero también hay que considerar algunos factores con cierto riesgo para nuestras intenciones. Puntos fuertes del uso de Facebook en elearning El primer turno para conocer el potencial que podemos aprovechar. Sin duda el detonante de la propuesta que hoy os contamos. Es accesible para todos Facebook es una herramienta con la que casi todos estamos familiarizados. Se puede acceder fácilmente en cualquier momento y en cualquier lugar. Tan simple como hacerlo desde un smartphone. Si asumimos que la mayoría de nuestros alumnos ya están usando Facebook, construir un pequeño campus virtual con recursos de aprendizaje se vuelve particularmente fácil y eficiente sin tener que buscar otra plataforma virtual. Perfecta para aplicar el social learning Existe una variedad de formas de utilizar Facebook para el aprendizaje social, porque por su naturaleza fomenta la comunicación abierta, el intercambio de información y la creación de redes de personas. Al utilizar Facebook como una plataforma de aprendizaje online, les permitimos a nuestros alumnos debatir ideas, hacer preguntas, compartir experiencias y descubrir nueva información. Dado que la interacción social impacta positivamente en la forma en que las personas aprenden y trabajan, Facebook es una plataforma ideal para impulsar la colaboración y el aprendizaje activo. Mejora la participación del alumno Debido a que Facebook es tan popular y cómodo de usar, facilita a los alumnos más difíciles de motivar a participar en las actividades. Las plataformas de aprendizaje social fomentan la participación en debates online hasta a los estudiantes más pasivos que realizan sus preguntas, comentarios o sugerencias. Coste económico bajo Facebook es una de las formas más rentable para compartir contenido de elearning. Imaginémoslo como un sistema de gestión de aprendizaje con estructura y navegación predefinidas. Lo único que debemos hacer es decidir cómo deseamos organizar y distribuir nuestro curso online. Puntos poco fuertes del uso de Facebook en elearning Es importante conocerlos y procurar salvarlos para que no sean los responsables de no haber intentando un plan formativo bajo el paraguas de la red social. Ocasiona distracción Seguramente que en más de una alguna ocasión hemos entrado a “sólo comprobar rápidamente algo” y, antes de que nos demos cuenta, ya hemos pasado una hora viendo imágenes, vídeos y otras publicaciones.

Hey Flight Crew :) This podcast episode is brought to you by... YOU :D Show your support by following my social media so we can continue to discuss my Uneducated Opinions

On this episode I dish on Mark Zukerberg, Tristan third trimester cheating Thompson, and Michael Brown the AMAZING teen who got accepted into 20 colleges and the three stank women on the news that had somethin negative to say about it.

Cleveland Willis. Dove â??Racistâ?? Soap Ad-Lola Ogunyemi, ,Harvey Weinstein, Terry Crews.Jemele Hill, Melania Trump and Ivana Trump,Joel Embiid, DeAndre Harris ,Eminem, DEF-JAM 25, BET Hip-HOP Awards, DOLPHIN COACH-Chris Foerster-Kijuana, Nige, Mike Ditka PUERTO RICO , TRUMP, Mark Zukerberg, Tyrese vs.The Rock, UFC Ron Palillo Horshack NBA TALK Comment, SHARE and SUBSCRIBE https://www.facebook.com/NetboyDoc/ https://twitter.com/netboydoc instagram@netboydoc ITunes.apple.com/us/podcast/OurWorldNetboyDoc --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/strange-talk-doc/message

Cleveland Willis. Dove â??Racistâ?? Soap Ad-Lola Ogunyemi, ,Harvey Weinstein, Terry Crews.Jemele Hill, Melania Trump and Ivana Trump,Joel Embiid, DeAndre Harris ,Eminem, DEF-JAM 25, BET Hip-HOP Awards, DOLPHIN COACH-Chris Foerster-Kijuana, Nige, Mike Ditka PUERTO RICO , TRUMP, Mark Zukerberg, Tyrese vs.The Rock, UFC Ron Palillo Horshack NBA TALK Comment, SHARE and SUBSCRIBE https://www.facebook.com/NetboyDoc/ https://twitter.com/netboydoc instagram@netboydoc ITunes.apple.com/us/podcast/OurWorldNetboyDoc --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/strange-talk-with-doc/message

EP68 Melbourne Musings Podcast – Brent and Ash talk vietnam, old guys with young asian wives, torture parks, horse meat, Mark Zukerberg, marriage equality, food, all this and many more illogical tangents.

PART 2 of our Intriguing Conversation with International Speaker/Trainer, Bestselling author and Master Entrepreneur Peter Sage. About the 6 months he spent Undercover as a "Secret Agent of Change" in one of the toughest prisons there are; without ever committing or being found guilty of a crime! time on the inside of the British Prison System. What he learned and how it changed him. Do you remember the lyric from: We Are The Champions, by Queen? "I've done my sentence but committed no crime"On this episode of Dov Baron Leadership and Loyalty Show: One of The most intriguing conversation you'll ever hear! Highly successful entrepreneur, an international business man, bestselling author and seminar leader Peter Sage.Peter spent time in one of the toughest prisons there are without ever committing or being found guilty of a crime! This is PART 2 (of a 2 part) Intriguing Conversation with International Speaker/Trainer, Bestselling author and Master Entrepreneur Peter Sage. About the his time on the inside of the British Prison System. What he learned and how he became: Peter Sage "Secret Agent of Change!" Imagine being sentenced to spend 6 months in the UK's toughest prison without being accused or convicted of any crime? When you get out you'd have no criminal record, but nonetheless, you will have had to be in an overcrowded, violent environment where drugs and violence are rife. Could you make it?No, this is not some reality Show! This is the experience of International Best Selling Author and Renowned Public Speaker, who at 18 years old wrote and published his first book on health and fitness, ‘Supreme Physique’.Peter Sage. Named one of the greatest leaders and entrepreneurs of 2015 by Inspiring Leadership Now alongside Sir Richard Branson, Elon Musk and Mark Zukerberg.Peter Sage is a well-known international entrepreneur with over twenty-five years experience in growing fast-paced enterprises. During this time he launched, operated and brought to success over two dozen companies, several of which he took from scratch to over 8 figures. A long-standing member of the global Entrepreneurs Organisation, For several years Peter also served as a member of the advisory board for the Centre for Entrepreneurship at INSEAD – a global top-five business school and one of the world leaders in the field of entrepreneurship education Peter is also an advisor to the Hungarian Government on their creative think tank policies.More on Peter: http://PeterSage.com More on hiring Dov Baron: http://fullmontyleadership.com See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

6 Months Undercover in a London Prison, as a Secret Agent of Change!Do you remember the lyric from: We Are The Champions, by Queen? "I've done my sentence but committed no crime"On this episode of Dov Baron Leadership and Loyalty Show: One of The most intriguing conversation you'll ever hear! Highly successful entrepreneur, an international business man, bestselling author and seminar leader Peter Sage.Peter spent 6 months Undercover as a "Secret Agent of Change" in one of the toughest prisons there are without ever committing or being found guilty of a crime! This is PART 1 (of a 2 part) Intriguing Conversation with International Speaker/Trainer, Bestselling author and Master Entrepreneur Peter Sage. About the his time on the inside of the British Prison System. What he learned and how it changed him. Imagine being sentenced to spend 6 months in the UK's toughest prison without being accused or convicted of any crime? When you get out you'd have no criminal record, but nonetheless, you will have had to be in an overcrowded, violent environment where drugs and violence are rife. Could you make it?No, this is not some reality Show! This is the experience of International Best Selling Author and Renowned Public Speaker, who at 18 years old wrote and published his first book on health and fitness, ‘Supreme Physique’.Peter Sage. Named one of the greatest leaders and entrepreneurs of 2015 by Inspiring Leadership Now alongside Sir Richard Branson, Elon Musk and Mark Zukerberg.Peter Sage is a well-known international entrepreneur with over twenty-five years experience in growing fast-paced enterprises. During this time he launched, operated and brought to success over two dozen companies, several of which he took from scratch to over 8 figures. A long-standing member of the global Entrepreneurs Organisation, For several years Peter also served as a member of the advisory board for the Centre for Entrepreneurship at INSEAD – a global top-five business school and one of the world leaders in the field of entrepreneurship education Peter is also an advisor to the Hungarian Government on their creative think tank policies.More on Peter: http://PeterSage.com More on hiring Dov Baron: http://fullmontyleadership.com See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

En la columna del programa @embonh hablamos sobre que Mark Zukerberg presentó al Papa un drone que puede llevar internet a lugares donde actualmente no hay. ¿Cómo impacta la tecnología en la religión?

Reunión entre Mark Zukerberg y el Papa Whatsapp: Nueva actualización que modifica las condiciones de servicio

Look, there have been all kinds of websites since the internet exploded in the early 90's. I mean E-bay, Myspace, Youtube, and even Twitter were game changers. Not to mention the original Email sites like Yahoo, AOL and all those guys. I have been internet savvy since it popped off, and I have not seen ANYTHING that had the strangle hold that FACEBOOK has right about now. FB is the idea of the decade by far. It's creator Mark Zukerberg is the youngest billionaire on the planet because of it. It's ridiculously simple and addictive, and to top it all off...IT's FREE! NOTHING else in this world that so many people use so much is FREE. NOTHING! I am an admitted FB junkie. There is no shame in my game. It's like saying I'm ashamed that I like movies, music, or TV. So I embrace my addiction proudly since unlike those other thing is life, my addiction to FB actually can HELP me. Of course, there are those that misuse the site and turn it into a relationship destroying missile, or a platform to spew BS agendas and information, but nothing is perfect. There are numerous reason why people use it, promoting something, keeping in touch, playing games, or just passing time. As much as some people criticize it (while at the same time POSTING ON FB about how bad it is!! IDIOTS!) you can not deny the genius and convenience of it. Here are the questions 1) HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT FACEBOOK IN GENERAL? 2) WOULD YOU SAY YOU ARE A FB JUNKIE, AND WHY DO YOU MOSTLY USE FB? 3) WHAT IS THE BEST AND WORST PART ABOUT FB TO YOU? 4) IF YOU COULD CHANGE ONE THING ABOUT FB WHAT WOULD IT BE? 5) WOULD YOU BE UPSET IF FB SHUT DOWN? 6) HAVE YOU EVER HAD ANY REAL DRAMA COME FRO FB?

Nesse podcast Ricardo apresenta os principais destaques sobre a premiação promovida pela revista inglesa The Economist para as principais inovações do ano. Destaques para a premiação recebida por Ratan Tata pelo projeto to veículo de baixo custo Tata Nano e para Mark Zukerberg fundador do Facebook. Tópicos relacionados ao gerenciamento de projetos como ferramenta para a implantação da inovação estavam entre os assuntos discutidos no evento de 2 dias que reuniu 120 participantes de todo o mundo.

In this podcast Ricardo presents the highlights of the award promoted by the British magazine The Economist for the most important innovations of the year. Ratan Tata for the low cost car "Tata Nano" and Mark Zukerberg, Facebook founder, are among the recepients. Topics of how project management is critical for innovation implementation were among the discussed items in a 2 day meeting with more than 120 people from all over the world.