Podcasts about Sigmund Freud

Mary Roberts Rinehart -- "America's Agatha Christie," as she used to be called -- set this story in a New York suburban town, shortly after the end of the first world war. Dick Livingstone is a young, successful doctor, who in the course of events becomes engaged to Elizabeth Wheeler. But there is a mystery about his past, and he thinks himself honor-bound to unravel it before giving himself to her in marriage. In particular, a shock of undetermined origin has wiped out his memory prior to roughly the last decade. Rinehart, who presumably had been reading, or reading about, the then popular Sigmund Freud, plays on what today is called "repressed memory," as she takes Dick into his past, and into the dangers that, unknown to him, lurk there. Is she correct about the behavior of memory? Who knows? After all, this is not a clinical treatise, but a work of fiction, one of the thrillers that made her such a popular writer of the earlier twentieth century.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Mary Roberts Rinehart -- "America's Agatha Christie," as she used to be called -- set this story in a New York suburban town, shortly after the end of the first world war. Dick Livingstone is a young, successful doctor, who in the course of events becomes engaged to Elizabeth Wheeler. But there is a mystery about his past, and he thinks himself honor-bound to unravel it before giving himself to her in marriage. In particular, a shock of undetermined origin has wiped out his memory prior to roughly the last decade. Rinehart, who presumably had been reading, or reading about, the then popular Sigmund Freud, plays on what today is called "repressed memory," as she takes Dick into his past, and into the dangers that, unknown to him, lurk there. Is she correct about the behavior of memory? Who knows? After all, this is not a clinical treatise, but a work of fiction, one of the thrillers that made her such a popular writer of the earlier twentieth century.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Mary Roberts Rinehart -- "America's Agatha Christie," as she used to be called -- set this story in a New York suburban town, shortly after the end of the first world war. Dick Livingstone is a young, successful doctor, who in the course of events becomes engaged to Elizabeth Wheeler. But there is a mystery about his past, and he thinks himself honor-bound to unravel it before giving himself to her in marriage. In particular, a shock of undetermined origin has wiped out his memory prior to roughly the last decade. Rinehart, who presumably had been reading, or reading about, the then popular Sigmund Freud, plays on what today is called "repressed memory," as she takes Dick into his past, and into the dangers that, unknown to him, lurk there. Is she correct about the behavior of memory? Who knows? After all, this is not a clinical treatise, but a work of fiction, one of the thrillers that made her such a popular writer of the earlier twentieth century.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Mary Roberts Rinehart -- "America's Agatha Christie," as she used to be called -- set this story in a New York suburban town, shortly after the end of the first world war. Dick Livingstone is a young, successful doctor, who in the course of events becomes engaged to Elizabeth Wheeler. But there is a mystery about his past, and he thinks himself honor-bound to unravel it before giving himself to her in marriage. In particular, a shock of undetermined origin has wiped out his memory prior to roughly the last decade. Rinehart, who presumably had been reading, or reading about, the then popular Sigmund Freud, plays on what today is called "repressed memory," as she takes Dick into his past, and into the dangers that, unknown to him, lurk there. Is she correct about the behavior of memory? Who knows? After all, this is not a clinical treatise, but a work of fiction, one of the thrillers that made her such a popular writer of the earlier twentieth century.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Mary Roberts Rinehart -- "America's Agatha Christie," as she used to be called -- set this story in a New York suburban town, shortly after the end of the first world war. Dick Livingstone is a young, successful doctor, who in the course of events becomes engaged to Elizabeth Wheeler. But there is a mystery about his past, and he thinks himself honor-bound to unravel it before giving himself to her in marriage. In particular, a shock of undetermined origin has wiped out his memory prior to roughly the last decade. Rinehart, who presumably had been reading, or reading about, the then popular Sigmund Freud, plays on what today is called "repressed memory," as she takes Dick into his past, and into the dangers that, unknown to him, lurk there. Is she correct about the behavior of memory? Who knows? After all, this is not a clinical treatise, but a work of fiction, one of the thrillers that made her such a popular writer of the earlier twentieth century.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Mary Roberts Rinehart -- "America's Agatha Christie," as she used to be called -- set this story in a New York suburban town, shortly after the end of the first world war. Dick Livingstone is a young, successful doctor, who in the course of events becomes engaged to Elizabeth Wheeler. But there is a mystery about his past, and he thinks himself honor-bound to unravel it before giving himself to her in marriage. In particular, a shock of undetermined origin has wiped out his memory prior to roughly the last decade. Rinehart, who presumably had been reading, or reading about, the then popular Sigmund Freud, plays on what today is called "repressed memory," as she takes Dick into his past, and into the dangers that, unknown to him, lurk there. Is she correct about the behavior of memory? Who knows? After all, this is not a clinical treatise, but a work of fiction, one of the thrillers that made her such a popular writer of the earlier twentieth century.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Mary Roberts Rinehart -- "America's Agatha Christie," as she used to be called -- set this story in a New York suburban town, shortly after the end of the first world war. Dick Livingstone is a young, successful doctor, who in the course of events becomes engaged to Elizabeth Wheeler. But there is a mystery about his past, and he thinks himself honor-bound to unravel it before giving himself to her in marriage. In particular, a shock of undetermined origin has wiped out his memory prior to roughly the last decade. Rinehart, who presumably had been reading, or reading about, the then popular Sigmund Freud, plays on what today is called "repressed memory," as she takes Dick into his past, and into the dangers that, unknown to him, lurk there. Is she correct about the behavior of memory? Who knows? After all, this is not a clinical treatise, but a work of fiction, one of the thrillers that made her such a popular writer of the earlier twentieth century.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

In a season of Stillness—but I'm still here. ❤️‍

Rahel und Nils sprechen über den Essayband "Kulturelle Spiegelungen zwischen H. P. Lovecraft und Deutschland", der von ihnen und Max – allesamt Kultist:innen der dLG – herausgegeben wurde. Aus dem Klappentext:Das Verhältnis zwischen H. P. Lovecraft und Deutschland gestaltet sich als eine vielschichtige, komplexe und zentrifugale Wechselbeziehung zweier Kulturräume: Dass Spuren deutscher Einflüsse in den Erzählungen, Gedichten, Briefen und Aufsätzen des Schriftstellers äußerst zahlreich sind, wird bereits beim Auftreten deutscher Figuren im Werk immer wieder offensichtlich. Bei genauerer Betrachtung erschließt sich jedoch Lovecrafts unmittelbare Bezugnahme auf (Fach-)Diskurse, die unter einflussreichen, beim Autor teilweise explizit genannten Namen wie etwa Oswald Spengler, Friedrich Nietzsche, Sigmund Freud oder Albert Einstein firmieren. Jene Rezeptionsspuren reichen von einer bloßen Namensnennung bis hin zu elaborierten intertextuellen Verweisstrukturen und zeugen so von ihrer werkimmanenten Relevanz. Nicht zuletzt Lovecrafts Thematisierung des Ersten Weltkriegs, der ihm als narrative Kulisse dient, bietet immer wieder Anlass zu Reflexionen über die Rolle der Deutschen innerhalb des Konfliktes und der hochgradig zwiespältigen Verbindung der Kulturräume.Dennoch finden diese weiterführenden Spuren in der internationalen Forschung bisher wenig Beachtung; wenn sie diskutiert werden, passiert dies meist in Hinblick auf Lovecrafts Haltung zum Ersten Weltkrieg oder als Ausgangspunkt für den kritischen Umgang mit Lovecrafts Xenophobie. An genau dieser Stelle versteht sich der vorliegende Sammelband als interdisziplinärer Brückenschlag, der die Forschungslücke schließt, indem er den Formen und Funktionen der kulturellen Spiegelungen, Resonanzen und Netzwerken zwischen Lovecraft und dem Deutschen auf reziproke Weise nachspürt.Links:Das Buch beim Herder Verlag: https://www.herder.de/wissen/shop/p8/88948-kulturelle-spiegelungen-zwischen-h-p-lovecraft-und-deutschland-gebundene-ausgabe/Credits:Intro gesprochen von Jenny SeewaldOutro von Huan Vu mit freundlicher GenehmigungAmbiances/Musik von http://tabletopaudio.com (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Christopher Moore's new novel Anima Rising combines his signature elements – complicated artists, suspicious detectives, a bawdy sisterhood, and supernatural bonking – into a strangely moving tale of friendship and survival. Set in 1911 Vienna, Chris's new novel is a spiritual sequel to his 2012 art world masterpiece Sacré Bleu: A Comedy d'Art and, in anticipation of his upcoming book tour, Chris reveals how his fondness for Gustav Klimt and Mary Shelley drives this unlikely comic adventure; how both Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung had to figure into the story (because: 1911 Vienna); and how his novels are becoming increasingly touching...or at least that's how they're being read. (Length 21:17) The post 961. Christopher Moore's Frankenstein appeared first on Reduced Shakespeare Company.

„Amíg a tudattalan tudatossá nem válik, addig a tudatalatti irányítja az életed.” Sigmund Freud születésnapján körbejártuk, milyen hatással van a pszichoanalízis a modern terápiákra, mit jelent József Attila freudo-marxizmusa, mitől Freudi a reklámipar, és miként alakult ki a vágygazdaságtan. Vendégeink voltak dr. Bokor László pszichoanalitikus, dr. Kiss Kata Dóra társadalomtudós, dr. Czabán Samu, a Partizán szerkesztője.Csatlakozz adód 1%-ának felajánlásával!https://szja.partizan.huNév: Partizán Rendszerkritikus Tartalomelőállításért AlapítványAdószám: 19286031-2-42Visszatért az amerikánós trió – kövesd mostantól a BIRODALOM adásokat kéthetente szerdánként a legfrissebb világpolitikai történések elemzéséért!Támogatás—A mögöttünk álló közösség biztosítja kérdéseink valódi erejét, fennmaradásunkat és függetlenségünket. Az alábbi módokon tudod támogatni munkánkat:Iratkozz fel!Értesülj elsőként eseményeinkről, akcióinkról, maradjunk kapcsolatban:https://csapat.partizanmedia.hu/forms/maradjunk-kapcsolatbanLegyél rendszeres támogatónk!Szállj be a finanszírozásunkba közvetlen támogatásal:https://cause.lundadonate.org/partizan/supportLegyél önkéntes!Csatlakozz a Partizán önkéntes csapatához:https://csapat.partizanmedia.hu/forms/csatlakozz-te-is-a-partizan-onkenteseihezTematikus hírleveleink—Szerdánként külpolitika: Heti Feledy hírlevélhttps://csapat.partizanmedia.hu/forms/partizan-heti-feledyPéntek Reggel, a Partizán hírháttér podcastjának levele: https://pentekreggel.huSzombaton Vétó hírlevél:https://csapat.partizanmedia.hu/forms/iratkozz-fel-a-veto-hirlevelereYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@PartizanmediaFacebook: https://facebook.com/partizanpolitika/Facebook Társalgó csoport: https://www.facebook.com/groups/partizantarsalgo Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/partizanpolitika/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@partizan_mediaPartizán saját gyártású podcastok: https://rss.com/podcasts/partizanpodcast/További támogatási lehetőségekről bővebben: https://www.partizanmedia.hu/tamogatas

2025晨鐘課－每天，都是新的起點 以歷史智慧滋養生活，點亮2025每一天！ 借鑑過去，活在當下，展望未來！ 粵語廣播網站 (時兆出版社授權錄製) https://soundcloud.com/mediahk Podcast@靈修廣播站 5月6日 沒有宗教 「因為上帝知道，你們吃的日子眼睛就明亮了，你們便如上帝能知道善惡。」 創世記 3：5   一個讓心理學家們絞盡腦汁的問題是：究竟是上帝創造了人類，還是人類創造了上帝？1856年5月6日，西格蒙德．佛洛伊德（Sigmund Freud，1856–1939年）出生在奧地利帝國摩拉維亞弗萊堡的一個猶太人家庭，他後來成為心理分析學派的創始人。作為廿世紀最有影響力且頗具爭議的思想家之一，佛洛伊德向上帝的概念和宗教的本質發起了挑戰。他設想了一個成熟的社會，其中的人們過著沒有宗教束縛的道德生活。 佛洛伊德認為，孩童需要「父親的保護」，而上帝的概念正是人類對這種需求的投射，也就是說，上帝是「一個被極度崇高化的形像」。佛洛伊德將宗教歸結為「一種幻覺」，是人類「童年精神官能症」的殘留 。當其他無神論者堅決否認上帝的存在和宗教的意義時，佛洛伊德卻提出了一種頗令人信服的心理過程，使人們從幼稚的「宗教營區」遷移到成熟的「非宗教社會」中去。 難怪托尼．坎波洛（Tony Camplo）稱佛洛伊德為「沒有信仰的使徒」，並宣稱：「在啟蒙運動的衝擊下，宗教無疑已經走向衰落，但正是佛洛伊德所提出的對人性的嶄新理解，使得任何關於人類本質和原因的宗教解釋變得無比天真。」 然而從《聖經》的角度來看，想要透過遠離上帝和祂的聖言來達到成熟的目的，不過是伊甸園中那古蛇花言巧語的迴響。蛇先是巧舌如簧地埋怨上帝的話有諸多限制且不合理，然後提出了一種似乎更加自由且合理的辦法。在〈創世記〉第3章5節中，蛇辯稱：「因為上帝知道，你們吃的日子眼睛就明亮了，你們便如上帝能知道善惡。」 1939年，佛洛伊德逝世，但他的眾多擁護者依然效法他，繼續給上帝和宗教貼上標籤。也許你正在承受社會帶給你的心理壓力，想要放棄那所謂「幼稚的宗教」。請永遠不要因為忠於上帝和祂的話語而感到羞恥（路9： 23–26）！

Samtiden säger att vi ska uthärda och aldrig ge upp. Men att alltid avsluta saker leder till tyranni, konstaterar David Wästerfors. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna.Det går lätt i början, du nästan flyger fram. Musiken i hörlurarna lyfter dig, stegen känns självklara, skorna sitter perfekt. Marken liksom fjädrar när du springer din favoritrunda i kvarteret, på väg mot parken.Men efter ett tag blir andningen tyngre. Benen känns stumma, humöret förmörkas. Det här blir för tufft, du har överskattat dig själv, du måste ge upp.Men hur då, egentligen? Stanna och gå tillbaka – så nesligt och meningslöst. Stanna och vila – även det ganska nesligt. Det blir svårt att komma i gång igen, kanske omöjligt.Du känner igen motståndet och de dystra tankarna. Du biter ihop och härdar ut. Du fortsätter, fortsätter, fortsätter.En sådan här bild av kamp och envishet utgör en kontrast till bilden av att ge upp. Att ge upp gör oss sällan stolta eller malliga. Vi döljer gärna våra övergivna projekt och avbrutna löparrundor eller bäddar ned dem i fraser och lånade resonemang. ”Jag kände mig krasslig”, ”musten gick ur mig”, ”vädret slog om”, ”jag fick ett samtal”. Att ge upp brukar kräva en förklaring – en kulturellt tillgänglig ursäkt – vilket motsatsen inte alls kräver, alltså att lyckas, att fullfölja något.Hjältar i filmer eller spänningsromaner ger sig inte, däri ligger själva hjältestatusen. Motgångar infinner sig förstås, men till slut reser de sig. Men hjältarna blir tragiska om de helt saknar förmåga att i vissa lägen ta ett steg tillbaka och omgruppera. Att fortsätta slåss när slaget är förlorat blir ingen hjältesaga, bara ett kvitto på bristande ödmjukhet och realism.Vi säger väl aldrig ”hon är riktigt bra på att ge upp” eller ”att ge upp kan vara bra för dig”, men vi kan legitimera en avbruten strävan med att vi lärt känna våra begränsningar. Att tillåta sig ge upp i en prestationsorienterad kultur kan rättfärdigas precis så, som om vi förväntas finna en lärdom även i nederlaget, en tröstande liten vinst.Ungefär de här tankarna finner jag i den brittiske essäisten Adam Phillips bok ”On Giving Up”. Jag känner mig lite lurad av titeln eftersom bara den första texten handlar om att ge upp. Resten handlar om andra saker, till exempel om känslan av att vara vid liv eller om nöjet i att censurera sig själv.Adam Phillips är psykoanalytiker och förlorar sig naturligtvis i Sigmund Freud och psykoanalysens interna angelägenheter. På sidan 67 är jag nära att ge upp. Phillips tolkning av intrigerna mellan Freud och hans kronprins Carl Jung på det internationella psykoanalytiska förbundets kongress i München 1913 intresserar mig måttligt. Jag har andra olästa böcker i hyllorna. Varför ska jag lägga tid på just den här?Men skam den som ger sig. Jag fortsätter, fortsätter, fortsätter.Phillips lånar en aforism av Franz Kafka för att formulera vårt kanske vanligaste trick för att motstå frestelsen att ge upp. Vid en viss punkt, skrev Kafka, finns ingen väg tillbaka, ”och det är den punkten som måste nås”. Om vi bara lyckas avverka en så lång bit av löparrundan att vi lika gärna kan fortsätta – att vi hellre kan fortsätta, att det känns för sent att vända om – ja, då minskar risken för att vi kapitulerar. Vi kan med andra ord arrangera våra egna och andras handlingar så att frestelsen göms undan eller minimeras.Framgång består i att nå Kafkas punkt, att se till att bomma igen fönstren och stänga nödutgången. Men Phillips lyfter också fram det faktum att ”giving up” är tvetydigt. På svenska är den här tvetydigheten dold, men på engelska blir den uppenbar: ”to give up smoking”, ”to give up drinking”. Att ”ge upp” kan stå för något vi ibland beundrar och vill ta efter. Det finns en sorts ”ge upp” när vi tror att vi kan förändras och en annan sort när vi tror att vi inte kan det. I båda fallen offras något, men värderingen av det som offras varierar.Den här tvetydigheten i handlingen att ge upp är talande. Att alltid avsluta saker blir tyranni, ett slags förtryck som begränsar vårt medvetande. Det kan ge oss tunnelseende eller en avsmalnad uppfattningsförmåga, som om vi inte kunde föreställa oss något annat än ”framåt, framåt!” Att ge upp kan då synliggöra andra vägar – åt sidan eller bakåt. Vi kan också få syn på vårt beroende av andra som kanske fångar upp oss när vi faller, som kommer med en kopp te och några lindrande ord – och påminner om alternativ.Att ge upp har fått dåligt rykte i vår kultur, men ett milt och försiktigt sätt att erkänna sig besegrad skiljer sig från ett drastiskt. Det måste inte ses som skamligt.Ett självmord är den mest slutliga och radikala kapitulation vi kan föreställa oss. Självmord anses fel, ett kulturell tabu, tidigare var det kriminaliserat. Och ogillandet av självmordet kanske på ett underförstått sätt bidrar till att även små kapitulationer har fått något skamset över sig, som om hela ens identitet skulle gå till spillo i och med att Projekt A eller B kapsejsar.En mjukare modell finns i sömnen. Varje kväll ger vi upp när vi avslutar dagen och lägger oss i sängen. Vi överger ambitionerna, planerna, vår fåfänga strävan och våra offentliga roller. Vi överlämnar oss till det planlösa, det omedvetna. Att somna utgör en vardaglig variant av att erkänna sig besegrad, kulturellt godkänd och mentalt stärkande.Vi vill inte vara en ständigt vaken, sömnlös person – vi vet hur lättretlig en sådan person är. Vi vill vara en återställd och utvilad människa, alltså en som igår kväll gav upp. Men vi gav inte upp för alltid, vi gav bara upp just där och då.Inför varje strid mot de vita kolonisatörer i Nordamerika under 1800-talet brukade urfolket the Crow uppföra soldansen, en vädjande och stärkande dans med militära inslag. Men folket kuvades och stod inför utplåning. Vad skulle de göra med soldansen när det inte längre fanns någon mening att slåss? Tre alternativ stod till buds: att fortsätta dansa som om inget hade hänt, trots att den heliga funktionen försvunnit; att hitta på en ny mening med dansen, kanske definiera den som hälsobringande eller en vädjan om vackert väder; eller helt enkelt ge upp.The Crow gav upp soldansen kring 1875. Det blev ett sätt att bekräfta den kulturella förstörelsen. Risken fanns att dansen annars skulle degenerera till en nostalgisk parodi på sig själv. Därmed blev det också möjligt för urfolket att röra sig bortom sitt nederlag och inte fastna i det förflutna. Det var dags att – hur orättvist det än var – arbeta fram mer pragmatiska relationer till den där vita överheten.Det är inte givet att den som tvingas ge upp verkligen avstår från att skapa något.När den prisade författaren Sami Said intervjuades i radion och fick frågan ”hur vet du att du är klar?” citerade han sin kollega Claes Hylinger som sagt att det vet man aldrig som författare. Man blir faktiskt aldrig färdig med sitt manus. Man ger upp.Said beskrev hur han sitter med sina tusentals sidor – utkast och fragment i överflöd – och in i det sista är genuint osäker på hur hans roman ska se ut.Till slut skickar han in ändå, ”skit samma”. Och sen trycks boken.David Wästerforssociolog

Adina und Pauline kennen beide das ungute Bauchgefühl, das eindeutig warnt: Tu das lieber nicht. Aber ist diese innere Stimme wirklich verlässlich – oder doch nur ein Produkt vergangener Erfahrungen, Hormone und unbewusster Prozesse?In dieser Folge gehen die beiden der Frage auf den Grund, wie viel Wahrheit wirklich in unserer Intuition steckt. Sie sprechen über Sigmund Freud und das Unbewusste, Paulines Vespa-Unfall, transgenerationales Trauma – und Adina erklärt, welchen Einfluss Hormone auf unser Bauchgefühl haben. Kannst du deiner Intuition wirklich trauen? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

After one of my closest friends passed away, I decided to do something he always encouraged me to try—interview myself. In this honest and heartfelt conversation, I open up about grief, faith, psychology, and why I still believe in God, even when life hurts. Along the way, I challenge Freud's claims, explore how the brain reflects intelligent design, and share how walking through pain taught me to love deeper. If you've ever wrestled with loss or faith, I made this for you.

In this episode of the Programming Lions podcast, Dr. Carole Lieberman, a renowned forensic psychiatrist and bestselling author, joins the hosts to discuss her extensive background and controversial topics. Known as 'America's Psychiatrist,' Dr. Lieberman has been involved in high-profile cases and is an authority on psychological trauma, terrorism, and media politics. She shares her journey into psychiatry, influenced by Sigmund Freud and her time studying under Anna Freud. The conversation delves into her latest work on Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), its symptoms, and potential treatments, as well as the impact of wokeness in psychiatry and healthcare. Dr. Lieberman also touches on her book 'Lions and Tigers and Terrorists, Oh My!' which offers guidance for parents on discussing terrorism with children. Tune in for an engaging discussion filled with bold insights and clinical expertise.X: https://x.com/DrCaroleMDWebsite: www.drcarole.comLions and Tigers and Terrorists: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=lions+and+tigers+and+terrorists&crid=335JN98V0LIJD&sprefix=lions+tigers+and+terr%2Caps%2C181&ref=nb_sb_ss_p13n-pd-dpltr-2-ranker_1_21TIMELINE00:00 Introduction to Dr. Carole Lieberman00:56 Dr. Lieberman's Background and Career05:04 Discussing Social Issues and Psychoanalysis06:20 The Impact of Social Contagions12:18 Trump Derangement Syndrome Explained22:29 Challenges in Psychiatry and Higher Education30:20 Conclusion and Future Discussions

Pour bénéficier de 4 mois offerts sur votre abonnement de 2 ans à NordVPN, veuillez cliquer sur ce lien:nordvpn.com/savoir---------------Pendant des siècles, le monde entier a célébré William Shakespeare comme le plus grand dramaturge de tous les temps. Ses pièces ont traversé les âges, explorant l'âme humaine avec une finesse et une profondeur inégalées. Pourtant, un doute étrange plane encore autour de sa figure : et s'il n'avait jamais existé ?1. Le doute naît d'un silenceTout commence au XIXe siècle, dans une époque où la critique littéraire devient plus méthodique, presque scientifique. Des chercheurs se penchent sur la vie de Shakespeare… et découvrent un vide troublant. On connaît très peu de choses sur l'homme de Stratford-upon-Avon. Pas de lettres conservées, aucun manuscrit de pièce de sa main, pas de preuve directe qu'il ait jamais voyagé hors d'Angleterre, ni fréquenté une université. En revanche, les œuvres sont remplies de références érudites au droit, à la politique, à la géographie italienne ou à la cour d'Angleterre, que l'on imagine difficilement accessibles à un simple fils de gantier, formé dans une école de province.C'est ainsi qu'un courant de pensée émerge : celui des anti-stratfordiens, convaincus que William Shakespeare n'aurait été qu'un prête-nom, une sorte de figure publique derrière laquelle se cacherait un véritable génie littéraire. Parmi les suspects avancés, on trouve Francis Bacon, philosophe et juriste, Christopher Marlowe, dramaturge rival, ou même la comtesse de Pembroke, femme de lettres éduquée et influente. L'idée séduit jusqu'à des figures prestigieuses comme Mark Twain, Sigmund Freud ou Henry James, qui voient mal comment un homme si discret, sans archives, aurait pu écrire Hamlet, Le Roi Lear ou Othello.Mais ce doute, aussi séduisant soit-il, résiste mal aux preuves historiques.2. Les preuves de son existenceCar William Shakespeare, loin d'être un fantôme, a laissé de nombreuses traces dans les archives. Des actes de propriété, des contrats, des témoignages contemporains — notamment celui du poète Ben Jonson, qui le connaissait personnellement — confirment qu'un certain William Shakespeare était acteur, auteur et homme d'affaires à Londres. Plusieurs pièces publiées de son vivant portent son nom. Il possédait même un théâtre, le Globe, où ses œuvres étaient jouées avec succès.3. Le testament : une preuve irréfutableMais la preuve la plus tangible, la plus intime aussi, reste son testament, rédigé peu avant sa mort en 1616. Ce document de trois pages, soigneusement conservé aux Archives nationales de Londres, porte sa signature à trois reprises. On y découvre un homme soucieux de ses proches, léguant ses biens, mentionnant son épouse Anne Hathaway, ses filles, et ses collègues de théâtre. L'existence même de ce testament contredit l'idée d'un mythe vide : il y avait bien un homme derrière le nom.Fait notable : ce testament vient d'être reproduit en 100 exemplaires fac-similés, une première, permettant au public et aux chercheurs d'approcher ce texte fondateur de plus près.En conclusionLa controverse sur l'identité de Shakespeare dit beaucoup sur notre fascination pour le mystère et le génie. Mais les faits, eux, sont têtus. Grâce à des documents officiels, à des témoignages directs — et surtout à ce testament signé de sa main, récemment remis en lumière —, il ne fait plus de doute que William Shakespeare a bel et bien existé. Et que le plus grand auteur anglais était aussi un homme bien réel. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Många har velat hitta systemet i Walter Benjamins tänkande. Kanske är det i naturen snarare än samhället man ska söka, funderar Mattias Hagberg. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna.Den 22 december 1926 gör Walter Benjamin en anteckning i sin dagbok som med några få ord sammanfattar hela hans samhällsfilosofi. Det gäller, skriver han, att tränga så långt in i de enskilda föremålens inre att ett helt universum till slut uppenbarar sig.Walter Benjamin är i Moskva under ett par månader för att försöka förstå den ryska metropolen, dess människor och dess politiska och kulturella liv under sovjetstyret, men hans tankar i dagboken går för det mesta till enskildheter. Walter Benjamin var en samlare som värderade ting högt. Hans korta filosofiska anmärkning från den 22 december är inbäddad i personliga iakttagelser om vykort, leksaker och annat som han tyckte om att köpa på sig.Ja, det enskilda föremålet, vare sig det var en ovanlig leksak eller ett alldagligt textfragment, var onekligen Walter Benjamins element. Ur hans intima, för att inte säga kärleksfulla förhållande till tingen, växte ett säreget tänkande med en ovanligt stark verkanshistoria. Walter Benjamin är utan tvekan en av 1900-talets mest citerade författare och kritiker. Och citerande. Hans främsta verk – det oavslutade ”Passagearbetet” om Paris på 1800-talet – är som ett herbarium, som en sammanställning av stadens ekologi. På ett ställe i detta väldiga verk skriver han:”Metoden för detta arbete: litterärt montage. Jag har ingenting att säga. Bara att visa. Jag kommer inte att stjäla något värdefullt och inte att lägga mig till med några snillrika formuleringar. Däremot trasorna, avfallet: jag vill inte inventera dem, utan låta dem komma till sin rätt, på det enda sätt som är möjligt: genom att använda dem.”Det är lätt att betrakta Walter Benjamin som en materialist, som en tänkare djupt förankrad i de livlösa tingen. Men frågan är om inte den tanken drar åt fel håll. I Walter Benjamins värld var föremålen inte döda utan levande, de var öppningar mot historiens pulserande nu, de var mer ångande biologi än sval fysik.I receptionen av Walter Benjamin har Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud och judisk messianism varit viktiga referenspunkter, liksom fransk surrealism och tysk idealism. Walter Benjamin har ofta beskrivits som en eklektisk författare som lyckades sammanföra vitt skilda traditioner, utan att för den del försöka sig på något enhetligt systembygge, åtminstone inte officiellt.Men frågan är om det ändå inte finns ett namn som binder samman hela Walter Benjamins livsverk, ett namn som ofta förbisetts i diskussionerna om hans intellektuella arv, ett namn så tungt att det lätt glöms bort: Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Men inte Goethe som nyskapande författare, utan Goethe som naturfilosof och biolog.Filosofen Eli Friedlander har med framgång prövat just denna tes i flera texter, bland annat i den uppslagsrika boken ”Walter Benjamin and the Idea of Natural History” från 2024. Enligt Eli Friedlander är Goethe ständigt närvarande i Walter Benjamins texter, och då framför allt Goethes växtlära, så som han utvecklade den från slutet av 1700-talet. I denna lära finns nämligen idén om det enskilda som rymmer det universella, om det lilla, oansenliga fröet som bär på växtens hela liv. Ja, mer än så. Goethe talade gärna om urplantan, om en sorts självrepeterande sekvens, där alla växter och alla växtdelar egentligen bara var variationer på ett och samma grundläggande tema. Med andra ord: I det lilla finns det stora. I det enkla det komplexa. I det enstaka det generella.Men Goethes växtlära, hans biologi om man så vill, bar på betydligt mer än denna suggestiva bild av urfenomenet. Han var också något av en tidig ekolog, en naturfilosof som såg livet som ett system, som en trasslig härva av ömsesidiga beroenden. Han såg naturens oändliga mångfald och dess metamorfoser och transformationer.Under hans berömda resa till Italien i slutet av 1780-talet formulerade han dessa insikter med några vackra ord:”Hela växtriket framstår för oss som en jättelik ocean som är lika nödvändig för existensen av insekter, som världshaven och dess floder är en existensbetingelse för fiskar. Vi ser att en stor mängd levande varelser föds och får näring ur denna ocean av växter.”I Goethes formuleringar och idéer om växtvärlden finns en sorts dialektik, ett växelspel mellan det lilla som rymmer det stora och det stora som är nödvändigt för det lilla. Ingen växtvärld utan enskilda växter, inga enskilda växter utan en växtvärld.För Eli Friedlander blir därför Walter Benjamin en ekologisk tänkare, en författare som tar spjärn mot Goethes växtlära när han försöker få syn på det moderna samhället och på dess historia. Likt en botaniker rör han sig genom Europa under mellankrigstiden och samlar modernitetens frön, skott och plantor.På ett ställe i ”Passagearbetet”, efter en direkt hänvisning till Goethes tankar om urfenomenet, beskriver Walter Benjamin hur han vill låta historien utgå från det enskilda ”liksom den empiriska växtvärldens hela rikedom vecklas ut ur bladet.”Ja, genom att lägga tonvikten vid Walter Benjamins nära förhållande till Goethes naturlära erbjuder Eli Friedlander ett nytt och produktivt sätt att läsa Walter Benjamin. Även om det är lätt att ha invändningar. Walter Benjamin är ju trots allt en författare som är så komplex att han lätt lånar sig till alla möjliga typer av läsningar.Men det viktiga är kanske inte vem som har mest rätt i sin tolkning, utan snarare vilken typ av läsningar som har mest potential i just sin tid. Det var ju trots allt så som Walter Benjamin själv såg på historien och litteraturen, som en möjlighet. För honom existerade dåtiden bara på det sätt som den aktualiserades i sin samtid.I sina ”Historiefilosofiska teser”, förmodligen det sista han skrev före självmordet i Port Bou 1940, uttryckte han detta klart:”Att historiskt artikulera någonting förgånget är inte detsamma som att inse 'hur det egentligen var'. Det är detsamma som att tillgodogöra sig en minnesbild sådan den blixtlikt aktualiseras i ett ögonblick då det är fara på färde.”Nyckelorden i citatet är så klart ”fara på färde”. Walter Benjamin skrev i en mörk och farlig tid, och inför hotet från nazismen, stod han inte ut. Men hans texter lever vidare. Och kanske kan ett sammanlänkande av det ekologiska med det historiska ge oss redskap för att tala om vår tid. Vi lever trots allt i en och samma ocean av liv. Mattias Hagbergförfattare och journalistLitteraturWalter Benjamin, ”Moskvadagbok”, Bokförlaget Faethon, 2025 (Översättning: Christian Nilsson).Walter Benjamin, ”Passagearbetet”, Bokförlaget Atlantis, 2015 (Översättning: Ulf Peter Hallberg).Walter Benjamin, ”Historiefilosofiska teser”, ur ”Bild och dialektik, Bokförlaget Daidalos, 2014 (Översättning Carl-Henning Wijkmark).Eli Friedlander, ” Walter Benjamin and the Idea of Natural History”, Stanford University Press, 2024. Johan Wolfgang von Goethe, “Goethes italienska resa”, Walström & Widstrand, 1921, (Översättning: Alf Ahlberg)

Imaginez une nuit glaciale. Deux hérissons cherchent à se rapprocher pour se réchauffer. Mais dès qu'ils s'approchent trop, leurs piquants les blessent. Ils s'éloignent, puis tentent à nouveau de se rapprocher, sans jamais trouver la distance idéale. Cette métaphore, formulée par le philosophe Arthur Schopenhauer au XIXe siècle, illustre le paradoxe des relations humaines : notre besoin de proximité se heurte à la peur de la souffrance que cette proximité peut engendrer.Sigmund Freud a repris cette image pour décrire la complexité des relations humaines. Plus nous nous rapprochons des autres, plus nous devenons vulnérables. Cette vulnérabilité peut entraîner des blessures émotionnelles, des conflits ou des rejets. Pour se protéger, certains choisissent de s'isoler, évitant ainsi le risque de souffrir, mais se privant également de la chaleur des relations humaines.Une étude menée par Jon Maner et ses collègues en 2007, publiée dans le Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a exploré ce phénomène. Les chercheurs ont découvert que les personnes ayant vécu une exclusion sociale étaient plus enclines à rechercher de nouveaux liens sociaux. Cela suggère que, malgré la peur de la blessure, le besoin de connexion reste fondamental.Cependant, cette recherche de lien peut être entravée par des mécanismes de défense. Par exemple, une personne ayant été blessée dans le passé peut éviter de s'engager à nouveau, par crainte de revivre la même douleur. Ce comportement, bien que protecteur à court terme, peut conduire à une solitude prolongée et à un isolement émotionnel.Le dilemme du hérisson nous rappelle que l'intimité comporte des risques, mais que l'isolement n'est pas une solution durable. Trouver un équilibre entre proximité et protection est essentiel. Cela implique de développer une communication ouverte, de poser des limites saines et de cultiver la confiance en soi et en l'autre.En somme, le dilemme du hérisson illustre la tension entre notre désir de connexion et notre peur de la souffrance. Reconnaître cette tension et apprendre à naviguer entre ces deux pôles peut nous aider à construire des relations plus épanouissantes et authentiques. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

In this episode I take an exhaustive look at the diverse perspectives of depression, that pervasive mood disorder that afflicts far too many people. I explore its gradual onset and chronic, often life-long course, and highlight the overwhelming features of depression, from low mood and poor appetite to poor sleep and loss of interest in pleasurable activities. I also explore the less appreciated dimension of the pain of depression.I illustrate the lived experience of depression with such fascinating patient accounts as that of Sally Brampton titled Shoot the Damned Dog, of Lewis Wolpert titled Malignant Sadness, of Andrew Solomon titled The Noonday Demon, and of William Styron titled Darkness Visible. Significantly, the memoirs stress the difficulty people have in recognising that their low mood has crossed the threshold into depression.The interplay of familial and environmental risk factors of depression is also a major theme of the podcast which emphasised such critical provoking life events as divorce and loss of income. I also discussed the risk of suicide that may complicate depression, a theme that I explored by relying on the book When It is Darkest by psychologist and suicide expert Rory O'Connor.I also discuss the different treatment modalities of depression, from antidepressants and psychotherapy to somatic therapy, the long road to recovery, and the ever-present risk of treatment resistance and relapse. Other themes the podcast covers are the shame and stigma that accompany depression.The historical themes of the podcast highlight the insights of Abu Zayd Al Balkhi in depression and cognitive behaviour therapy, that roles played by Sigmund Freud and Joseph Breuer in establishing psychoanalysis, and that of Nathan Kline in the development of the first antidepressant.

Este é um episódio especial, pois estamos comemorando cinco anos de podcast! Inicialmente traremos algumas palavrinhas sobre o nosso aniversário, e depois entraremos propriamente no tema de hoje: a obra Psicologia de massas do fascismo, de Wilhelm Reich. - Curso "Filosofia para a vida: refletir para viver melhor": https://www.udemy.com/course/filosofia-para-a-vida-refletir-para-viver-melhor/?couponCode=BE5B6DBB07E071132BA1- Curso "Introdução à filosofia - dos pré-socráticos a Sartre": https://www.udemy.com/course/introducao-a-filosofia-dos-pre-socraticos-a-sartre/?couponCode=7BB397D5A6D72D16C73D- Curso "Crítica da religião: Feuerbach, Nietzsche e Freud": https://www.udemy.com/course/critica-da-religiao-feuerbach-nietzsche-e-freud/?couponCode=C6FFB214BB21FEDFD42C ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Curso "A filosofia de Karl Marx - uma introdução": https://www.udemy.com/course/a-filosofia-de-karl-marx-uma-introducao/?couponCode=C87428344DEF349E407A- Inscreva-se gratuitamente em nossa newsletter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://filosofiavermelha.org/index.php/newsletter/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Apoia.se: seja um de nossos apoiadores e mantenha este trabalho no ar: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://apoia.se/filosofiavermelha⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Nossa chave PIX: filosofiavermelha@gmail.com- Adquira meu livro: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.almarevolucionaria.com/product-page/pr%C3%A9-venda-duvidar-de-tudo-ensaios-sobre-filosofia-e-psican%C3%A1lise⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Meu site: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.filosofiaepsicanalise.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Clube de leitura: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWEjNgKjqqI⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Publicado em 1933, este livro teve o mérito de analisar o movimento de massas fascista em sua ascensão, antes mesmo da ampla divulgação de todos os horrores dos campos de concentração. A obra é uma das primeiras sínteses entre psicanálise e marxismo, servindo de base para diversos outros pensadores do século XX que empreenderam o diálogo entre as obras de Sigmund Freud e Karl Marx. Veremos o papel desempenhado pela repressão sexual, pela religião e pela estrutura familiar como elementos fundamentais da mentalidade fascista.

In this podcast we will be talking about how to know your true self using Jungian Archetypes according to the philosophy of Carl Jung. Carl Jung's psychology is called analytical psychology and his philosophy is dubbed as “Jungian philosophy”. Jung's most famous theory is ‘the individuation process.'  Carl Jung introduced the world to the idea of archetypes - common personality patterns that exist in everyone's mind. These archetypes affect how we think, act, and interact with the world. Imagine waking up with no memory of who you are—no name, no past, no identity. Yet, even with this blank slate, something inside you pulls in a certain direction. Maybe you feel an instinct to protect others, an unshakable drive to explore the unknown, or a knack for bending situations to your advantage. As you observe the world, patterns emerge. Some people step forward with confidence, while others linger in the background. Some deceive, some nurture, some fight for justice, and others thrive in chaos. At first, it seems random, but then a realization hits—you're not alone in this. People everywhere are shaped by unseen forces, playing out roles they may not even be aware of. You can think of Jung's archetypes as universal patterns that shape how we think, feel, and act. They appear across cultures and time periods, persisting in myths, stories, and even our daily lives. And these roles aren't confined to fiction. They shape us in the real world. A young entrepreneur fighting for a vision is living the Hero's journey. A mentor guiding others embodies the Wise Old Man. A disruptor challenging the status quo channels the Trickster. These patterns influence how we see ourselves, the choices we make, and the way we navigate life - often without us even realising it. So, which archetypes are shaping you?  So here are the steps you need to take to truly know yourself using Jungian Archetypes according to the philosophy of Carl Jung. 01. Understanding the Structure of Your Psyche 02. Understanding different Archetypes 03. Analyse your dreams   04. Pay attention to your archetypes in your waking life 05. Integrate Archetypes for Personal Growth I hope you enjoyed listening to this podcast and hope that this wisdom on how to truly know yourself using Jungian Archetypes according to the philosophy of Carl Jung,  will be helpful in your life.  Carl Jung, together with Sigmund Freud and Alfred Adler, is one of the 3 founders of psychoanalysis which is a set of psychological theories and methods aiming to release repressed emotions and experiences - in other words, to make the unconscious conscious. Jung was born in Switzerland in 1875 and died in 1961, leaving behind great works in the fields of psychiatry, anthropology, archaeology, literature, philosophy, psychology and religious studies. Jung had Freud as a mentor for a good part of his career but later he departed from him. This division was painful for Jung and it led him to found his own school of psychology, called analytical psychology as a comprehensive system separate from psychoanalysis. If classical psychoanalysis focuses on the patient's past, as early experiences are very important in personality development, analytical psychology primarily focuses on the present, on mythology, folklore, and cultural experiences, to try to understand human consciousness. One of the most important ideas of analytical psychology which Jung founded is the process of individuation, which is the process of finding the self - something Jung considered an important task in human development. While he did not formulate a systematic philosophy, he is nonetheless considered a sophisticated philosopher - his school of thought dubbed “Jungian philosophy”. Its concepts can apply to many topics covered in the humanities and the social sciences. A good part of his work was published after his death and indeed there are still some articles written by him that to this day have yet to be published. Some of his most important books are: “Psychology of the Unconscious”, “Man and His Symbols”, “The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious”, “Modern Man In Search of a Soul”, “The Psychology of the Transference”, “Memories, Dreams, Thoughts”, and “The Relations Between the Ego and the Unconscious”. Besides being a great writer and a researcher, he was also an artist, a craftsman and even a builder. His contribution is enormous and there is a great deal we can learn from his works.

To donate to my PayPal (thank you): https://paypal.me/danieru22?country.x=US&locale.x=en_US Sigmund Freud's analysis of Jensen's Gradiva is part of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud Volume IX-X. Article by Robert Lloyd Goldstein: https://jaapl.org/content/jaapl/11/3/273.full.pdf Note: Information contained in this video is for educational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for treatment or consultation with a mental health professional or business consultant.

In The Ego and the Id, Sigmund Freud uses the analogy of a horse and rider to illustrate the relationship between the ego and the id, emphasizing that we may have less control over the unconscious than we'd like to believe. Yet, a decade later in New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, Freud introduces the psychoanalytic motto: “Where id was, there ego shall be,” hinting at the possibility of greater agency than he originally proposed. This tension—between the limits of our control and the hope for transformation—has always intrigued me. In this episode, I explore that dynamic by sharing a few key quotes from Freud, and one from Mari Ruti that I believe sheds meaningful light on this enduring paradox.

Sigmund Freud was one of the most prominent figures of the 19th and 20th centuries. The founder of psychoanalysis, he's viewed as one of the fathers of modern day psychiatry and psychology. But for all the interest in Freud, there's also much intrigue around him and perhaps even confusion as to what exactly his theories were, how accurate they were, and what kind of importance they play in our modern understanding of the mind. Professor Henk de Berg joins the podcast. Professor de Berg's book on Freud - https://www.amazon.ca/Freuds-Theory-Literary-Cultural-Studies/dp/1571133011 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Disability Series, Episode #1 of 4. How and when scientists, doctors, and society started conceiving of the physical and emotional components of same-sex desire as a psychiatric condition of the mind? This was neither an ancient belief nor a postmodern (aka, post-1950) one, and it wasn't an exclusively American phenomenon either. Rather, the classification of same-sex desire as a “disorder” had its roots in the foundations of psychiatry as a profession in the 19th century. Over the last 100+ years, that classification impacted individuals all across the world. You've heard of Sigmund Freud, whose work in the 1920s standardized a form of talk therapy that sought to interpret actions, thoughts, and desires through a particular lens of analysis. “Psychoanalysis,” though short-lived as a psychiatric practice, was certainly part of the longer-term framing of queerness and transness as “mental illness.” But Freud is just the tip of the iceberg. Today we're digging into the history and relationship between psychiatry and sexuality; the scientific theories of sexuality that helped shape modern ideas about the relations between gender, genitals, desire, and identity; and the consequences of the medicalization of sexuality. Bibliography Adriaens, Pieter R., and Block, Andreas De. Of Maybugs and Men : A History and Philosophy of the Sciences of Homosexuality, University of Chicago Press, 2022. James E. Bennett and Chris Brickell, "Surveilling the Mind and Body: Medicalising and De-medicalising Homosexuality in 1970s New Zealand," Medical History 62, no. 2 (2018): 199-216. Ross Brooks, “Transforming Sexuality: The Medical Sources of Karl Heinrich Ulrichs (1825–95) and the Origins of the Theory of Bisexuality,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 67 (2010) 177–216. Maurice Casey, “‘I want to be to Ireland what Walt Whitman was to America': Esotericism and Queer Sexuality in an Irish Social Circle, 1890s–1920s,” History Workshop Journal, 00 (2025), 1–22. Mian Chen, "Homo(sexual) socialist: Psychiatry and homosexuality in China in the Mao and early Deng eras," Gender & History 36 (2024): 657-672. Richard von Krafft-Ebing, Psychopathia Sexualis (1894) Harry Oosterhuis, Stepchildren of Nature (2000) John Stuart Miller, "Trip Away the Gay? LSD's Journey from Antihomosexual Psychiatry to Gay Liberationist Toy, 1955-1980," Journal of the History of Sexuality, Vol. 33, no. 2 (May 2024) Lamia Moghnieh, "The Broken Promise of Institutional Psychiatry: Sexuality, Women and Mental Illness in 1950s Lebanon," Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 47 (2023): 82-98 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A felicidade é mesmo possível ou estamos fadados ao sofrimento? Essa e outras questões serão abordadas no Linhas Cruzadas.Andresa Boni e Luiz Felipe Pondé apresentam as ideias do psicanalista Sigmund Freud com relação às causas do sofrimento e como superá-lo, levando a humanidade a encontrar a tal felicidade. No novo episódio "Impasses da Felicidade", será explorado como o corpo, o mundo externo e as relações humanas impactam nosso bem-estar, tornando a felicidade algo quase inatingível.Andresa e Pondé desafiam certezas e provocam reflexões sobre os dilemas da existência, desde o impacto da crise climática ao isolamento pessoal como estratégia para evitar a dor, conectando a filosofia pura de Freud.Assista ao Linhas Cruzadas, todas as quintas às 22h na TV Cultura.#TVCultura #LuizFelipePondé #AndresaBoni #Felicidade #Infelicidade #LinhasCruzadas

Bienvenidos una vez más a Buscadores de la Verdad. Hoy nos adentramos en un tema tan antiguo como la propia existencia humana: el Eros y el Tánatos, las dos grandes fuerzas que, según múltiples tradiciones y escuelas de pensamiento, mueven la vida y la muerte, el deseo y la destrucción. Para hablar de Eros, de esa energía vital que impulsa la unión y la creación, traemos una reflexión de Pedro Bustamante en Sacrificios y hierogamias, donde cita a Ludwig Klages, quien en Del Eros cosmogónico nos dice: “El Eros es llamado elemental o cósmico [cosmogónico] en la medida en que el individuo que es prendido por él se siente animado e invadido por una especie de corriente eléctrica que, comparable al magnetismo, hace que, con independencia de sus fronteras, las almas más alejadas puedan percibirse en un impulso común; él transforma el medio mismo de todas las acciones que separan a los cuerpos, es decir el espacio y el tiempo, en el elemento omnipresente que nos sostiene y nos rodea como un océano; él une también, a pesar de su diferencia siempre inalterable, los polos del mundo.” Una fuerza que trasciende los límites del yo y del otro, desdibujando el tiempo y el espacio en una comunión profunda. Pero allí donde Eros crea, también acecha Tánatos, el impulso hacia la disolución, hacia el final. ¿Cómo dialogan estas dos potencias en nuestra vida cotidiana? ¿Cómo se entrelazan, cómo se enfrentan? De esto hablaremos hoy. Si Eros representa el impulso hacia la vida, hacia la unión y la creación, Tánatos encarna la fuerza opuesta: el impulso hacia la disolución, el retorno a la inercia, la entrega al ciclo inexorable de la muerte. Pedro Bustamante, en Sacrificios y hierogamias, nos recuerda que los primeros seres humanos, profundamente vinculados a la naturaleza y sus ciclos, no podían escapar a las crisis que la vida misma imponía: “Los primeros grupos humanos, los más sometidos a los ciclos naturales, no tienen más remedio que adaptarse a ellos. Su cultura se aparta poco de la naturaleza, sus formas reproducen las naturales, los ritmos de las estaciones, de los astros, de los fenómenos atmosféricos. Es lógico que estas culturas primitivas estén enormemente marcadas por la naturaleza. Especialmente, que se vean afectadas en grado máximo por las crisis naturales: sequías, inundaciones, terremotos, erupciones volcánicas, escasez de alimento.” Tánatos se manifiesta entonces como esa presencia constante de la destrucción, de la pérdida, de la necesidad de rendirse ante fuerzas incontrolables. No como un castigo, sino como parte de un equilibrio más amplio, donde la vida y la muerte, la creación y la desaparición, se suceden en un mismo latido cósmico. Escritores como Norman O. Brown, un intelectual estadounidense y profesor de lenguas clásicas, ya hablaban en 1959 en “Eros y Tánatos: El sentido psicoanalítico de la historia” sobre estos temas. Este libro es considerado una obra clave en la intersección entre el psicoanálisis, la historia y la filosofía. Brown realiza una profunda reinterpretación de las ideas de Sigmund Freud, especialmente de los conceptos de Eros (el instinto de vida, asociado al amor, la creatividad y la unión) y Tánatos (el instinto de muerte, relacionado con la agresión, la destrucción y el retorno a un estado inorgánico), para analizar la naturaleza humana, la cultura y el desarrollo de la civilización. El libro parte de la premisa de que la humanidad sufre una "neurosis general", un conflicto interno que surge de la represión de los instintos básicos. Brown argumenta que la civilización, tal como la conocemos, se construye sobre esta represión, especialmente de los deseos eróticos, lo que genera una tensión constante entre los impulsos vitales (Eros) y los destructivos (Tánatos). Según Brown, esta represión no solo afecta a los individuos, sino que moldea la historia y las estructuras sociales, perpetuando un ciclo de insatisfacción y conflicto. Uno de los puntos centrales del libro es la idea de que la represión de Eros lleva a la humanidad a buscar "satisfacciones sustitutivas" en formas como el arte, la religión o la política, pero estas nunca logran resolver el conflicto subyacente. Brown propone que la historia humana puede entenderse como una lucha entre estos dos instintos: mientras Eros busca la conexión y la vida, Tánatos impulsa la separación y la muerte. Sin embargo, Brown no se limita a describir este conflicto; también sugiere una posible liberación. Aboga por una reconciliación con nuestros instintos, un retorno a una relación más plena con el cuerpo y el deseo, lo que él ve como una forma de superar la neurosis colectiva. El libro también explora cómo las ideas freudianas pueden aplicarse a la política y la naturaleza humana. Brown, quien escribió en un contexto de posguerra y auge de la contracultura, busca comprender el carácter político de la naturaleza humana y cómo las dinámicas de represión influyen en las estructuras de poder y las ideologías. Su análisis es profundamente interdisciplinario, combinando psicoanálisis con referencias a la literatura clásica, la filosofía y la historia. Aunque el concepto de Eros y Tánatos fue formulado en términos psicoanalíticos en 1959 con el libro Eros y Tánatos: El sentido psicoanalítico de la historia, la humanidad lleva reflexionando sobre estas dos grandes fuerzas desde la Antigüedad. Uno de los testimonios más claros lo encontramos en El banquete de Platón, una obra clave donde el erotismo, el amor y la muerte se entrelazan profundamente. Pedro Bustamante, en Sacrificios y hierogamias, destaca cómo en El banquete Platón ya intuye y articula esta dualidad fundamental a través de la figura de los dos Eros y las dos Afroditas: “Lo mismo sucede con los dos Eros y las dos Afroditas a las que se hace referencia en El banquete de Platón: Eros Uranio y Eros Pandemo, Afrodita Urania y Afrodita Pandemo. Aquí están presentes otra vez los temas de los que venimos tratando, las dos dimensiones de lo sacrificial, la transgresora y la modélica, la maléfica y la benéfica, la ctónica y la urania, la corporal y la espiritual, la inmanente y la trascendente. Lo que hay que subrayar es que esta duplicidad, tanto la de la figura masculina como la de la femenina, que remite en última instancia a la rivalidad y al sacrificio, se da justamente en una obra centrada en el erotismo y el amor.” Bustamante nos invita a entender que esta duplicidad no es un detalle menor, sino el núcleo mismo del relato: Eros Uranio, el amor celeste, espiritual, busca elevar el alma hacia lo divino; mientras que Eros Pandemo, el amor común, más terrenal, se relaciona con los placeres físicos y los impulsos inmediatos. De igual manera, Afrodita Urania y Afrodita Pandemos representan estas dos dimensiones, una trascendente y otra inmanente, una luminosa y otra sombría. Lo fascinante, como señala Bustamante, es cómo Platón entrelaza amor y muerte, deseo y sacrificio, en un mismo tejido simbólico. No es casual —nos recuerda— que el contexto de El banquete sea precisamente una celebración tras una victoria teatral, un certamen de tragedias, un género que, en su origen, estaba vinculado a rituales de sacrificio y a cultos dionisíacos. Así, el banquete no es solo un encuentro festivo, sino también un eco de los antiguos sacrificios, un espacio donde se celebra la vida a la vez que se honra la muerte. Bustamante subraya además que Sócrates, el gran protagonista del diálogo, afirma haber sido iniciado en los misterios del amor por Diotima, quien no solo enseña sobre el erotismo, sino también sobre el sacrificio. Esta doble enseñanza refuerza la idea de que el amor verdadero implica una forma de muerte simbólica: la superación del ego individual para fundirse en algo superior. Finalmente, la estructura dual que Platón propone, esa simetría entre dos Eros y dos Afroditas, queda recogida en una cita que no deja lugar a dudas: "Todos sabemos, en efecto, que no hay Afrodita sin Eros. Por consiguiente, si Afrodita fuera una, uno sería también Eros. Mas como existen dos, existen también necesariamente dos Eros. ¿Y cómo negar que son dos las diosas?” Así, El banquete se revela no solo como un tratado sobre el amor, sino como una profunda meditación sobre la tensión entre creación y destrucción, entre deseo y disolución, entre vida y muerte. Una tensión que sigue latiendo en nuestro inconsciente colectivo hasta nuestros días. Si miramos con atención, podemos imaginar a Eros y Tánatos como dos inmensos vórtices de energía que arrastran todo cuanto existe. Uno impulsa hacia la unión, hacia la creación de vida, hacia el encuentro con el otro; el otro empuja hacia la disolución, hacia el final inevitable, hacia el regreso a la nada. Y entre esos dos remolinos giramos nosotros, los seres humanos, atrapados en un movimiento eterno que da forma a nuestra historia, nuestras pasiones, nuestros miedos. El deseo de amar y ser amados, de fundirnos con otro, de dejar algo que nos trascienda, es la fuerza de Eros en nosotros. Es esa corriente vital que nos empuja a crear, a construir, a soñar. Y, al mismo tiempo, el temor a la muerte, a la pérdida, a la desaparición, a no haber dejado huella, es la expresión de Tánatos, que nos recuerda que somos finitos, que la vida es un préstamo fugaz. Estas dos fuerzas no solo están presentes en los grandes momentos de la historia o en las obras de arte; laten en lo más cotidiano de nuestras vidas. En cada acto de amor, en cada ambición, en cada miedo que sentimos, se manifiestan. Son los motores invisibles que mueven el mundo, los vientos profundos que soplan bajo la superficie de nuestras decisiones y sueños. Quizá entender a Eros y a Tánatos no sea tanto una cuestión de elegir entre uno u otro, sino de aceptar que ambos son necesarios: que la vida nace del deseo y se sostiene en la conciencia de su fragilidad. Que sin amor ni muerte, el mundo quedaría inmóvil. ………………………………………………………………………………………. Conductor del programa UTP Ramón Valero @tecn_preocupado Un técnico Preocupado un FP2 IVOOX UTP http://cutt.ly/dzhhGrf BLOG http://cutt.ly/dzhh2LX Ayúdame desde mi Crowfunding aquí https://cutt.ly/W0DsPVq Invitados Dra Yane #JusticiaParaUTP @ayec98_2 Médico y Buscadora de la verdad. Con Dios siempre! No permito q me dividan c/izq -derecha, raza, religión ni nada de la Creación. https://youtu.be/TXEEZUYd4c0 …. Siguiendo Fernando Beltrán @nenucosinpanial ………………………………………………………………………………………. Enlaces citados en el podcast: AYUDA A TRAVÉS DE LA COMPRA DE MIS LIBROS https://tecnicopreocupado.com/2024/11/16/ayuda-a-traves-de-la-compra-de-mis-libros/ ………………………………………………………………………………………. Música utilizada en este podcast: Tema inicial Heros ………………………………………………………………………………………. Epílogo EMAA - p o r t a l https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vM6FI64QCeU

Nghe trọn sách nói Những Nhà Tư Tưởng Lớn – Schopenhauer Trong 60 Phút trên ứng dụng Fonos: https://fonos.link/podcast-tvsn --Về Fonos:Fonos là Ứng dụng âm thanh số - Với hơn 13.000 nội dung gồm Sách nói có bản quyền, PodCourse, Podcast, Ebook, Tóm tắt sách, Thiền định, Truyện ngủ, Nhạc chủ đề, Truyện thiếu nhi. Bạn có thể nghe miễn phí chương 1 của tất cả sách nói trên Fonos. Tải app để trải nghiệm ngay!--Arthur Schopenhauer (22 tháng 2 năm 1788 – 21 tháng 9 năm 1860) là một nhà triết học duy tâm người Đức, nổi tiếng với trước tác Thế giới như là ý chí và biểu tượng xuất bản năm 1818. Xây dựng trên nền tảng triết học duy tâm siêu nghiệm của Immanuel Kant, ông đã phát triển một hệ thống luân lý và siêu hình vô thần bác bỏ những ý tưởng thời thượng lúc bấy giờ của trào lưu duy tâm Đức. Schopenhauer là một trong những trí thức phương Tây thế hệ đầu chia sẻ nhiều tư tưởng chung với triết học Ấn Độ, chẳng hạn như sự khổ tu, sự chối bỏ bản thân, và ý niệm cho rằng thế giới là sự phô chiếu ảo ảnh. Lý thuyết siêu hình của ông chính là nền tảng cho các tác phẩm về đề tài tâm lý học, mỹ học, đạo đức học và chính trị học, Phật học... những tác phẩm đã để lại tầm ảnh hưởng tới các danh nhân sau này như Friedrich Nietzsche, Wagner, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Sigmund Freud và nhiều người khác. Sách nói Những Nhà Tư Tưởng Lớn - Schopenhauer Trong 60 Phút sẽ cung cấp cho bạn những thông tin ngắn gọn và dễ hiểu nhất về Schopenhauer cùng tư tưởng triết học của ông.--Tìm hiểu thêm về Fonos: https://fonos.vn/Theo dõi Facebook Fonos: https://www.facebook.com/fonosvietnam/

In Throw Yourself Away: Writing and Masochism (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Julia Jarcho proposes that the desire to write is inextricably bound up with masochistic desires. In a series of readings that engage American and European works of fiction, drama, and theory from the late nineteenth through the early twenty-first centuries, Jarcho tests the limits of masochism as a pleasure-making economy. Reading Henry James, Henrik Ibsen, Mary Gaitskill, and Adrienne Kennedy alongside Sigmund Freud, Gilles Deleuze, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Leo Bersani and others, Jarcho investigates the ways in which masochism rewrites and reinvigorates failures of desire, which critics have otherwise thought of as dead-ending masochism. Jarcho asks particularly difficult questions of masochism as a response to injurious social structures, which yield less uniformly white, searching, and uneasy views of both masochism and authorship. Throw Yourself Away reconsiders how writing and subjects are undone by the excesses and recesses of masochistic desire, which keeps the prospect of pleasure so painfully, so deliciously at bay. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Författaren och journalisten Christian Dahlström berättar om sin senaste bok "Den enda rätta läran" som granskar Sigmund Freud och psykoanalysens historia i Sverige. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Season FIVE, Episode TWO! Before we get stuck in… Have you signed up for LTO COMMUNITY yet? It's our very occasional, non-spammy, actually-quite-useful newsletter packed with behind-the-scenes stories, first dibs on live show tickets, and the chance to suggest topics for our new LTO BRIEF episodes. SIGN UP HERE!  (Go on...Susie's waiting for you to do it...)   And now, to this week's episode! With just under 16,000 downloads, we've made a few upgrades to celebrate the fact that you keep listening and joining in: Slick new logo Mini fortnightly episodes – LTO BRIEF A brand-new newsletter – LTO COMMUNITY Same lovely sillies, comedy sketches, and brilliant guests! And speaking of brilliant guests… Our special guest is the legendary EMMA FREUD OBE  – a true powerhouse in broadcasting, film, and fundraising. Emma is a broadcaster, cultural commentator, script editor, and producer behind some of the most iconic films of our time—think Four Weddings and a Funeral, Notting Hill, Love Actually. She's also a driving force behind Comic Relief, helping to raise millions for important causes. Over her incredible career, Emma has interviewed everyone from David Attenborough to Mary Berry to Al Pacino, hosted arts shows, written for top publications, and shaped some of the most beloved stories in British cinema. She also happens to come from one of the most famous family lineages—she is the great-granddaughter of Sigmund Freud. We recorded this episode a couple of weeks ago, on the 40th anniversary of Comic Relief, making it the perfect time to reflect on Emma's incredible contribution to fundraising and entertainment. In this conversation, we talk to Emma about how she got started in broadcasting, her approach to living in the present and staying open to new opportunities, and her latest role as host of The Archers Podcast—plus, just how much The Archers means to her. We also dive into parenting, the fascinating history of her family name, and some of the most surreal moments of her career. And as an added bonus, we're joined by her husband, Richard Curtis, and—much to our delight—their kittens make an appearance too! Featuring chats, comedy sketches, and plenty of lovely surprises, LTO truly is a pick-me-up in podcast form. We're delighted to have you with us! Please share this episode with anyone you think would enjoy it. And if you haven't already rated and reviewed LTO, we'd be eternally grateful!   Instagram @limitedtimeonlypodcast Facebook Limited Time Only Podcast Email: limitedtimepodcast@gmail.com   LTO is created & written by, produced, edited & hosted by: SUSIE RIDDELL & ESTHER STANFORD It is a Limited Time Only Production   LOGO designed by: IAN STANFORD THEME TUNE composed by: JOEL WHITE ADDITIONAL SOUND:  https://freesound.org    

Here it is: the trailer for season six of The Cosmic Library, which comes out this month. It's "Karamazov Season," which means this five-episode miniseries will go into and beyond The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Sigmund Freud called it “the most magnificent novel ever,” and it contains so much—a murder mystery, philosophical conundrums, mathematical contemplation, and transformative scenes of ecstasy. For that reason, this miniseries will also contain so much. The first episode will include a radio play adapted from Dostoyevsky's novel, in which the parts of the three central brothers will be read by people who create fiction. Garth Risk Hallberg, author of City on Fire, will read the part of Dmitri Karamazov; Andrew Martin, author of Cool for America, will read the part of Ivan Karamazov; and WFMU host Hearty White is our Alyosha Karamazov.  After the play, the conversations begin. The novelists reflect on their own writing along with Dostoyevsky's; Hearty White connects cinema with radio with literature; scholars Robin Feuer Miller and Katherine Bowers consider the life of Dostoyevsky and his novel; and the mathematician Paulina Rowińska guides us through the logical and mathematical questions prompted by this book of conflicting and converging thoughts. It's a season about frenzied doubts and discoveries, about philosophical intensity and weird dreams, about mathematical questions and literary surprise. Find it this spring at Lit Hub or wherever you go for podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In our third episode on beliefs and ideologies, we explore China’s newfound enthusiasm for psychiatry. Counselling was only registered as a profession in 2001 yet has seen a massive boom under Xi Jinping. The psy-boom is such that even party branch meetings are doing mindfulness exercises, and practitioners are trying to indigenise counselling practices. There’s plenty to work on; the 2022 China Mental Health Survey found seven percent of the population were suffering from depression, half of them schoolchildren. To explore what’s drawing China to the couch, Louisa and Graeme are joined by Yiying Xiong, a counsellor and associate professor at John Hopkins University, Barclay Bram, an audio journalist at the Economist and fellow at the Asia Society, and medical anthropologist Hsuan-Ying Huang, from Taiwan’s National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University. Image: c/- Wikimedia Commons, Sigmund Freud's Couch, London, 2004. Episode transcripts are available at: https://ciw.anu.edu.au/podcasts/little-red-podcastSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This may be my most controversial teaching to date. It is common in spiritual circles to talk about the eo. We assume its existence without question but if there is actually no ego at all? How did Sigmund Freud influence the culture with his revolutionary ideas? What about non-dualism? What if everything we thought about the ego and therefore spirituality is wrong? Join me as together we ponder these questions. If you appreciate my work please consider a donation to "paypal.me/newdayglobal". Thank you!

Warum lachen wir eigentlich? Sigmund Freud ging dieser Frage nach und entdeckte dabei: Humor ist tief mit unserem Unbewussten verbunden. In seinem Werk "Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Unbewussten" zeigt er, wie Witze uns erlauben, soziale Tabus zu umgehen und verdrängte Gedanken auszudrücken. In dieser Folge tauchen wir in Freuds psychoanalytische Theorie ein und erkunden die Dynamik zwischen Ich, Es und Über-Ich beim Lachen. Wir erfahren, warum Humor als ausgeklügelter Abwehrmechanismus funktioniert und wie er uns hilft, mit unseren inneren Konflikten umzugehen – ohne uns dessen überhaupt bewusst zu sein. Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? **[Hier findest du alle Informationen & Rabatte](https://linktr.ee/philosophietogopodcast)**

In Throw Yourself Away: Writing and Masochism (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Julia Jarcho proposes that the desire to write is inextricably bound up with masochistic desires. In a series of readings that engage American and European works of fiction, drama, and theory from the late nineteenth through the early twenty-first centuries, Jarcho tests the limits of masochism as a pleasure-making economy. Reading Henry James, Henrik Ibsen, Mary Gaitskill, and Adrienne Kennedy alongside Sigmund Freud, Gilles Deleuze, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Leo Bersani and others, Jarcho investigates the ways in which masochism rewrites and reinvigorates failures of desire, which critics have otherwise thought of as dead-ending masochism. Jarcho asks particularly difficult questions of masochism as a response to injurious social structures, which yield less uniformly white, searching, and uneasy views of both masochism and authorship. Throw Yourself Away reconsiders how writing and subjects are undone by the excesses and recesses of masochistic desire, which keeps the prospect of pleasure so painfully, so deliciously at bay. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

In Throw Yourself Away: Writing and Masochism (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Julia Jarcho proposes that the desire to write is inextricably bound up with masochistic desires. In a series of readings that engage American and European works of fiction, drama, and theory from the late nineteenth through the early twenty-first centuries, Jarcho tests the limits of masochism as a pleasure-making economy. Reading Henry James, Henrik Ibsen, Mary Gaitskill, and Adrienne Kennedy alongside Sigmund Freud, Gilles Deleuze, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Leo Bersani and others, Jarcho investigates the ways in which masochism rewrites and reinvigorates failures of desire, which critics have otherwise thought of as dead-ending masochism. Jarcho asks particularly difficult questions of masochism as a response to injurious social structures, which yield less uniformly white, searching, and uneasy views of both masochism and authorship. Throw Yourself Away reconsiders how writing and subjects are undone by the excesses and recesses of masochistic desire, which keeps the prospect of pleasure so painfully, so deliciously at bay. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/literary-studies

I speak with Lacanian psychoanalyst Jason Childs about Sigmund Freud's “Some remarks on a Case of Obsessional Neurosis," aka the "Rat Man".

Anna Freud, the daughter of Sigmund Freud was also interested in psychoanalysis particularly in the areas of ego and child development. In this episode, Anna explains how she sees these subjects from her nonphysical perspective. She offers a new way of interacting with your ego, how formal education is unnecessary and is often a block in the way of childhood development. She also discusses how everything is contained in our DNA. For more info, click below: Gary Temple Bodley Christy Levy

Abby and Patrick welcome Ann Conrad Lammers, a Jungian psychotherapist and the primary editor and assistant translator of Dedicated to the Soul: The Writings and Drawings of Emma Jung, a brand-new volume from Princeton University Press. Going against the grain of traditional narratives that present Emma as a helpmeet to her more famous husband, this collection brings together for the first time many of Emma Jung's works across a variety of media and genres, highlighting her outsize contributions, both material and intellectual, to the tradition known as Analytical Psychology. The wide-ranging conversation explores Emma's biography, her ambitions, and her intellectual preoccupations. The three also dig into the story of how Emma managed the complications, at once personal and professional, of simultaneously being the wife of Carl Jung, a foundational player in several analytic institutions, a deeply respected correspondent of Sigmund Freud, and a clinician in her own right. What emerges is a tale of betrayals and boundary violations, but also of growth, resilience, and the confrontation of lifelong tasks, with implications not just for how we understand the often-neglected stories of many women clinicians in the early decades of psychoanalysis, but the stakes of confronting patriarchy while embracing the work of therapy in the present.Selected texts: Ann Conrad Lammers, Thomas Fischer, and Medea Hoch, editors. Dedicated to the Soul: The Writings and Drawings of Emma Jung, Princeton University Press, 2025.Ann Conrad Lammers. ‘Emma Jung's Years of Self-Liberation.' Essay available at:  https://press.princeton.edu/ideas/emma-jungs-years-of-self-liberation. Ferne Jensen and Sidney Mullen, editors. C.G. Jung, Emma Jung and Toni Wolff: A Collection of Remembrances. The Analytical Psychology Club of San Francisco, 1982Emma Jung and Marie-Louise Von Franz. The Grail Legend. Princeton University Press, 1998.Have you noticed that Freud is back? Got questions about psychoanalysis? Or maybe you've traversed the fantasy and lived to tell the tale? Leave us a voicemail! (646) 450-0847A podcast about psychoanalysis, politics, pop culture, and the ways we suffer now. New episodes on Saturdays. Follow us on social media:Linktree: https://linktr.ee/OrdinaryUnhappinessTwitter: @UnhappinessPodInstagram: @OrdinaryUnhappinessPatreon: patreon.com/OrdinaryUnhappinessTheme song:Formal Chicken - Gnossienne No. 1https://open.spotify.com/album/2MIIYnbyLqriV3vrpUTxxOProvided by Fruits Music

Eels are mysterious and have a fascinating history. People in pre-medieval England used them to pay rent. Early 17th-century maps featured 'eel ships,' and even Sigmund Freud studied their breeding and reproduction habits for a whole summer.Dr Ann Jones gets 'eely' curious about eels in today's What the Duck?!Featuring:Dr. John Wyatt Greenlee, Historian Cornell University. Erin Rose, Budj Bim World Heritage Executive Officer at Gunditj Mirring Traditional Owners Aboriginal Corporation.Braydon Saunders, Tour Guide Coordinator at Budj Bim Cultural Landscape Tourism.Tyson Lovett-Murray, Budj Bim World Heritage Ranger at Gunditj Mirring Traditional Owners Aboriginal Corporation.Wayne Koster, Research Scientist at the Arthur Rylah Institute, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, Victorian Government.Production:Ann Jones, Presenter / Producer.Petria Ladgrove, Producer.Additional mastering: Timothy Jenkins.This episode of What the Duck?! was originally broadcast in March 2023 and was produced on the land of the Gunditjmara, Wadawarrung and Kaurna people.

In this episode of ABA On Call, we kick off our new series, They Got It Wrong, by dissecting the legacy of Sigmund Freud and his controversial theory of psychoanalysis. Despite its historical influence, Freud's work was built on untestable assumptions and speculative reasoning rather than empirical science. We contrast his approach with the rigorous methods of behavior analysis, highlighting the importance of falsifiability, experimental validation, and data-driven interventions. Along the way, we explore the problematic implications of psychoanalytic thinking, from the harmful "refrigerator mother" theory of autism to the permissive reinforcement of maladaptive behaviors in therapy. Join us as we discuss why Freud's ideas persist in popular culture and academia and why behavior analysis provides a more reliable and humane approach to understanding human behavior.   To earn CEUs for listening, click here, log in or sign up, pay the CEU fee, + take the attendance verification to generate your certificate! Don't forget to subscribe and follow and leave us a rating and review.   Show Notes: https://www.livescience.com/why-freud-was-wrong.html https://www.verywellmind.com/sigmund-freud-his-life-work-and-theories-2795860

In another special episode dedicated to the how, what and why of memory, Gyles talks to his long-time friend and colleague Professor Brett Kahr. Professor Kahr is a practising psychotherapist and an expert on Sigmund Freud, the father of psychotherapy and the inventor of the "talking cure". In this fascinating conversation, Gyles and Prof. Kahr take a detailed look at the power of childhood memories, particularly traumatic ones, to effect our adult lives, and the benefits to be had from examining them and learning from them. Brett also tells Gyles about Freud himself, how he developed his ideas and how he escaped the Nazis and came to London. Gyles talks to Brett about some of the memories we've heard from our guests on Rosebud, and Brett talks about some of the common themes which come up in psychoanalysis - such as dreams and sex. This is a wide-ranging and thought-provoking conversation, we hope you enjoy it. Professor Kahr's book: Coffee with Freud, is available from major bookshops online. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Subscribe to get access to the full episode, the episode reading list, and all premium episodes! www.patreon.com/OrdinaryUnhappinessFor the first time since the inauguration, our series metabolizing the ongoing chaos of American politics returns. That's right: Gerontophallocracy is back! The topic is a certain grandiose deadbeat manchild patriarch who has succeeded in making himself even more of a ubiquitous object of speculation than Donald Trump: Elon Musk. But instead of focusing on Elon's erratic behavior and personal symptoms, Abby, Patrick, and Dan tackle the question of Musk's existence and prominence as a symptom of underlying political economic and libidinal economic conditions. It's a tale of the Return of the (Barely) Repressed extending from religious myths to secular fictions and from the dawn of patriarchy and emergence of private property to the dream of a future where the scions of billionaires can plant their flags and dynasties on Mars. It's a lot. Texts include:Friedrich Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State (available at https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/)Sigmund Freud, Totem and TabooKarl Marx, “The Secret of Primitive Accumulation,” in Capital Vol I (available at https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch26.htm)Robert Paul, "Yes, the Primal Crime Did Take Place," in Our Two-Track Minds: Rehabilitating Freud on CultureCarole Pateman, The Sexual ContractHave you noticed that Freud is back? Got questions about psychoanalysis? Or maybe you've traversed the fantasy and lived to tell the tale? Leave us a voicemail! (646) 450-0847  A podcast about psychoanalysis, politics, pop culture, and the ways we suffer now. New episodes on Saturdays. Follow us on social media:  Linktree: https://linktr.ee/OrdinaryUnhappiness Twitter: @UnhappinessPod Instagram: @OrdinaryUnhappiness Patreon: patreon.com/OrdinaryUnhappiness Theme song: Formal Chicken - Gnossienne No. 1 https://open.spotify.com/album/2MIIYnbyLqriV3vrpUTxxO Provided by Fruits Music

Propaganda, Öffentlichkeitsarbeit und Werbung: Edward Bernays erkennt früh, wie nah diese drei einander sind. Ist er über seinen Tod am 9.3.1995 hinaus der Ahnherr der Fake News? Von Christoph Vormweg.

Mental barriers that hold us back from success, fulfillment, and personal growth. Inspired by Jim Murphy's Inner Excellence and insights from thought leaders like Robert Greene, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Sigmund Freud, what is the psychology behind self-doubt, comparison, and self-sabotage.Inner Excellence by Jim MurphyThe 48 Laws of Power and The Laws of Human Nature by Robert GreeneBecoming Bulletproof by Evy PoumpourasThe Compound Effect by Darren Hardy Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

March 3rd, 1907. Dr. Sigmund Freud invites a guest into his office, Dr. Carl Jung. This is a meeting of the minds, about... the mind. Psychology. Freud and Jung will spend the next 13 hours discussing the unconscious, the hidden forces in our brains that guide our thoughts and decisions. They're two of the first doctors to explore this mysterious terrain, and this marathon meeting will spark a true friendship – until it all comes crashing down. How did Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung help shape the way we understand the human mind, that elusive unconscious? And why did their friendship eventually fall apart? Special thanks to our guests, Satya Doyle Byock, Jungian psychotherapist and author of Quarter Life, The Search for Self in Early Adulthood, and director of the Salome Institute of Jungian Studies; Dr. James Hollis, Jungian psychoanalyst and author of A Life of Meaning: Relocating Your Center of Spiritual Gravity; and Dr. George Makari, psychiatrist, historian, and author of Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis, and director of the DeWitt Wallace Institute of Psychiatry at Weill Cornell. To stay updated: historythisweekpodcast.com To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Show Notes This week on MSB we're talking about the Victory Gundam episode with a truly goth title: #42 'A Shining Vortex of Fresh Blood.' We discuss Sigmund Freud, weird facts, name and design references, the sour end to Lupe Cineau's improbably long career, what not having kids does to a woman (and how to fix it according to Dr. Uso), and a whole lot about the Zanneck's origins. Plus, Nina and Thom both reach their limits for very different reasons. Please listen to it! Mobile Suit Breakdown is written, recorded, and produced within Lenapehoking, the ancestral and unceded homeland of the Lenape, or Delaware, people. Before European settlers forced them to move west, the Lenape lived in New York City, New Jersey, and portions of New York State, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Connecticut. Lenapehoking is still the homeland of the Lenape diaspora, which includes communities living in Oklahoma, Wisconsin, and Ontario. You can learn more about Lenapehoking, the Lenape people, and ongoing efforts to honor the relationship between the land and indigenous peoples by visiting the websites of the Delaware Tribe and the Manhattan-based Lenape Center. Listeners in the Americas and Oceania can learn more about the indigenous people of your area at https://native-land.ca/. We would like to thank The Lenape Center for guiding us in creating this living land acknowledgment. You can subscribe to Mobile Suit Breakdown for free! on fine Podcast services everywhere and on YouTube, visit our website GundamPodcast.com, follow us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, or email your questions, comments, and complaints to gundampodcast@gmail.com. Mobile Suit Breakdown wouldn't exist without the support of our fans and Patrons! You can join our Patreon to support the podcast and enjoy bonus episodes, extra out-takes, behind-the-scenes photos and video, MSB gear, and much more! The intro music is WASP by Misha Dioxin, and the outro is Long Way Home by Spinning Ratio, both licensed under Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 licenses. All music used in the podcast has been edited to fit the text. Mobile Suit Breakdown provides critical commentary and is protected by the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright law. Gundam content is copyright and/or trademark of Sunrise Inc., Bandai, Sotsu Agency, or its original creator. Mobile Suit Breakdown is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Sunrise, Bandai, Sotsu, or any of their subsidiaries, employees, or associates and makes no claim to own Gundam or any of the copyrights or trademarks related to it. Copyrighted content used in Mobile Suit Breakdown is used in accordance with the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright law. Any queries should be directed to gundampodcast@gmail.com

What if the most powerful optimization tool wasn't a supplement or a workout plan, but the psychological resilience forged in life's crucible of adversity? In this episode, I had a fascinating conversation with fitness icon and entrepreneur Mike Rashid, whose transformation from the volatile streets of Brooklyn's cocaine-era 80s to building a wellness empire reveals profound truths about human potential and biological optimization. The science behind Mike's transformation is impeccable - early morning training combined with intermittent fasting creates a powerful neurobiological environment that optimizes hormone profiles and enhances neuroplasticity. What early life challenges could you transform into your greatest competitive advantage? Share your story in the comments below! Join Gary Brecka's FREE 3-Day Morning Routine Challenge!