Podcasts about semmelweis

2 Chronicles 34:1-7 A Boy King (vv. 1-3) Crowned by age 8 Committed by Age 16 Convicted by age 20 A Burdened King (vv. 4-6) The purge The priests The pandemic A Brave King (v. 7) He accomplished his mission He accepted his ministry More to Consider In 1818, Ignaz Phillip Semmelweis was born into a world of dying women. The finest hospitals lost one out of six young mothers to the scourge of "childbed fever." A doctor's daily routine began in the dissecting room where he performed autopsies. From there he made his way to the hospital to examine expectant mothers without ever pausing to wash his hands. Dr. Semmelweis was the first man in history to associate such examinations with the resultant infection and death. His own practice was to wash with a chlorine solution, and after eleven years and the delivery of 8,537 babies, he lost only 184 mothers--about one in fifty. He spent the vigor of his life lecturing and debating with his colleagues. Once he argued, "Puerperal fever is caused by decomposed material, conveyed to a wound. . .I have shown how it can be prevented. I have proved all that I have said. But while we talk ,talk, talk, gentlemen, women are dying. I am not asking anything world shaking. I am asking you only to wash...For God's sake, wash your hands." But virtually no one believed him. Doctors and midwives had been delivering babies for thousands of years without washing, and no outspoken Hungarian was going to change them now! Semmelweis died insane at the age of 47, his wash basins discarded, his colleagues laughing in his face, and the death rattle of a thousand women ringing in his ears. "Wash me!" was the anguished prayer of King David. "Wash!" was the message of John the Baptist. "Unless I wash you, you have no part with me," said the towel-draped Jesus to Peter. Without our being washed clean, we all die from the contamination of sin. For God's sake, wash. Boyce Mouton. Robert Murray McCheyne wrote to Dan Edwards after the latter's ordination as a missionary, "In great measure, according to the purity and perfections of the instrument, will be the success. It is not great talents God blesses so much as great likeness to Jesus. A holy minister is an awful weapon in the hand of God". Paul Borthwick, Leading the Way, Navpress, 1989, pp. 65. After a violent storm one night, a large tree, which over the years had become a stately giant, was found lying across the pathway in a park. Nothing but a splintered stump was left. Closer examination showed that is was rotten at the core because thousands of tiny insects had eaten away at its heart. The weakness of that tree was not brought on by the sudden storm; it began the very moment the first insect nested within its bark. With the Holy Spirit's help, let's be very careful to guard our purity. Our Daily Bread.

Biohacking, døgnrytme og hvorfor solen er kroppens glemte medisinFor en uke vi hadde!

Leállás lesz a Telekomnál: itt kell felkészülni Azonnal újra kell indítani a telefonokat, és mostantól naponta érdemes megismételni a műveletet, ha nem akarunk pórul járni Ráleltek a legendás atlantiszi fémre, az orichalcumra! Az északi országok és Észtország felkészül az internet leállására Nem mindenki alvászavaros, aki csak néhány órát alszik naponta Egy súlyos terhességi szövődmény megelőzését vizsgálták a Semmelweis kutatói Mesterséges intelligenciával növeli nyereségét a Kifli.hu anyacége Bőven van még tennivaló a “digitális” Európában Jövő héten jön a Samsung szupervékony Galaxy S25 Edge mobilja Bizonytalan időszakra figyelmeztet az Arm Hazánkba is megérkezett a falazórobot, ami kőművescsapatok munkáját láthatja el A trükkös Elon Musk most alaposan kiszúrt a riválisával Mesterséges intelligencia segíti a BMW-t a minőség-ellenőrzésben A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Leállás lesz a Telekomnál: itt kell felkészülni Azonnal újra kell indítani a telefonokat, és mostantól naponta érdemes megismételni a műveletet, ha nem akarunk pórul járni Ráleltek a legendás atlantiszi fémre, az orichalcumra! Az északi országok és Észtország felkészül az internet leállására Nem mindenki alvászavaros, aki csak néhány órát alszik naponta Egy súlyos terhességi szövődmény megelőzését vizsgálták a Semmelweis kutatói Mesterséges intelligenciával növeli nyereségét a Kifli.hu anyacége Bőven van még tennivaló a “digitális” Európában Jövő héten jön a Samsung szupervékony Galaxy S25 Edge mobilja Bizonytalan időszakra figyelmeztet az Arm Hazánkba is megérkezett a falazórobot, ami kőművescsapatok munkáját láthatja el A trükkös Elon Musk most alaposan kiszúrt a riválisával Mesterséges intelligencia segíti a BMW-t a minőség-ellenőrzésben A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Il Genio Che Inventò L'Igiene E Finì In Manicomio!Scopri la vera storia di Ignaz Semmelweis, il medico che cambiò il mondo con un gesto semplice ma fu punito per la sua genialità.#Semmelweis #StoriaDellaMedicina #Igiene #ScoperteCheHannoCambiatoIlMondo #ManiPulite #Ostetricia #GeniIncompresi #StorieVere #StoriaIncredibile #LavarsiLeMani

Michael Strong has spent decades quietly revolutionizing education by designing innovative schools and programs built around agency, critical thinking, entrepreneurship and creativity. He is the founder and CEO of The Socratic Experience, a virtual school that equips students for lifelong happiness and success through Socratic dialogue. Alongside his work in the US, he has educational consulting experience in multiple developing nations. And… he's a fellow Minnesotan! Michael joins the show to discuss whether Socratic education can scale, the benefits of the Mormon model, why high agency is the default, and MUCH more! I hope you enjoy this conversation as much as I did. For the full transcript, episode takeaways, and bucketloads of other goodies designed to make you go, “Hmm, that's interesting!”, check out our Substack. Important Links: Michael's Substack Twitter The Socratic Experience Show Notes: One book a night and mental chess - a Minnesotan childhood. Can Socratic education scale? Are we entrenching a new elite? Why high agency is the default Creating new subcultures & the benefits of the Mormon model Experimenting our way to prosperity Tearing down the citadel, secret censorship & claiming the moral high ground Prediction markets & why we should be betting on our reputation The heroic tradition of reason Michael as World Emperor MORE! Books Mentioned: Dr. Semmelweis vs. the World (Infinite Loops Substack) Ignore. Fight. Ridicule (Infinite Loops Substack) The Habit of Thought: From Socratic Seminars to Socratic Practice; by Michael Strong Be the Solution: How Entrepreneurs and Conscious Capitalists Can Solve All the World's Problems; by Michael Strong and John Mackey The Case Against Adolescence: Rediscovering the Adult in Every Teen; by Robert Epstein The Status Game: On Human Life and How to Play It; by Will Storr The New Inquisition: Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science; by Robert Anton Wilson Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior; by Christopher Boehm Collective Illusions: Conformity, Complicity, and the Science of Why We Make Bad Decisions; by Todd Rose Can Gambling Save Science? Encouraging an Honest Consensus; by Robin Hanson Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life; by Nassim Nicholas Taleb Hothouse Earth: An Inhabitant's Guide; by Bill McGuire Think in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts; by Annie Duke The Ultimate Resource; by Julian L. Simon Keep Your Identity Small; by Paul Graham

Átadták a Semmelweis Egyetem új Onko-intervenciós Részlegét

Jonathan Howard and Wendy Orent explore the controversial history of the Great Barrington Declaration, a document that advocated for herd immunity via natural infection, and its lasting impact on public health discourse. They critique the flawed claims made by its authors and discuss how the Declaration's proponents have rewritten its history to align with more socially palatable narratives. The hosts draw parallels to historical missteps in medicine, such as the unethical Tuskegee study, and dismantle comparisons to figures like Ignaz Semmelweis. Highlighting the real-world consequences of these ideas, they explore the devastation during Florida's Delta wave and challenge the notion that natural infection could protect the vulnerable. With Bhattacharya's Senate confirmation looming, they propose key questions that should be asked to hold him accountable for his actions during the pandemic.   Connect with us further on https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/author/jonathanhoward/  The Fine Print The content presented in the "We Want Them Infected" Podcast and associated book is intended for informational and educational purposes only.    The views and opinions expressed by the speakers, hosts, and guests on the podcast do not necessarily reflect the views of the creators, producers, or distributors. The information provided in this podcast should not be considered as a substitute for professional medical, scientific, or legal advice. Listeners and readers are encouraged to consult with relevant experts and authorities for specific guidance and information.   The creators of the podcast and book have made reasonable efforts to ensure that the information provided is accurate and up to date. However, as the field of medical science and the understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to evolve, there may be new developments and insights that are not covered in this content.   The creators are not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content or for any actions taken based on the information provided. They disclaim any liability for any loss, injury, or damage incurred by individuals who rely on the content.   Listeners and readers are urged to use their judgment and conduct their own research when interpreting the information presented in the "We Want Them Infected" podcast and book. It is essential to stay informed about the latest updates, guidelines, and recommendations related to COVID-19 and vaccination from reputable sources, such as government health agencies and medical professionals. By accessing and using the content, you acknowledge and accept the terms of this disclaimer.   Please consult with appropriate experts and authorities for specific guidance on matters related to health, science, and the COVID-19 pandemic.  

Vannak olyan esetek, mikor nem kell azonnal orvoshoz rohanni, de vannak olyanok is, mikor nem tűr halasztást. A bőrproblémák esetén ugyan ez a helyzet. Zavaró szemölcsök, kiálló anyajegyek levételére remek időszak a téli. Dr. Holló Péter egyetemi tanár Semmelweis egyetem bőr nemi kórtani és bőr onkológiai klinika igazgatója felhívta a figyelmet az azonnali problémák felismerésére is. Facebook: www.facebook.com/petofiradio/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/petofiradio/

In dieser Folge erzählt Andrea Sawatzki, wie Ignaz Semmelweis zum „Retter der Mütter“ wurde.

Facebook: www.facebook.com/petofiradio/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/petofiradio/

EPISODE 126 | Cognitive Biases and the Brain: Thanks, Evolution! (Because Reasons 11) The first of two episodes looking at cognitive biases - this one at how memory works and how we prevent input overload by filtering out information. Hopefully, this will give us some insight into why people think they way they do.  The primary source material for this is the Cognitive Biases Codex, created by Buster Benson and John Manoogian III, as used by the EU's Marie Curie CogNovo program for Conspiracy-Theories.EU. Like what we do? Then buy us a beer or three via our page on Buy Me a Coffee. You can also SUBSCRIBE to this podcast. Review us here or on IMDb!  SECTIONS Memories Can't Wait - Misinformation effect, testing effect, processing effect, spacing effect, Google effect, two types of absentmindedness, next-in-line effect, list length effect, serial position effect, suffix effect, part-list cueing effect, peak-end rule, duration neglect Fading affect bias, negativity bias, leveling and sharpening, Maude sees a Black man, suggestibility; false memory (UFO abductions, Satanic Panic), misattribution of memory, cryptoamnesia, source confusion (eyewitness testimony) Too Much Information - The availability heuristic, repetition makes it true - the illusory truth effect and the mere exposure effect, attentional bias, context effect, mood-congruent memory bias, cue-dependent forgetting, the frequency illusion and Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon, the base rate fallacy, the empathy gap (cold-to-hot and hot-to-cold), omission bias The bizarreness effect, humor effect, isolation effect (Von Resteroff effect), and picture superiority effect; bias blind spot, the introspection illusion, naïve cynicism, confirmation bias, congruence bias, choice-supportive bias (post-purchase bias), selective perception and the ostrich effect, observer-expectancy effect (also experimenter effect), subjective validation (the personal validation effect) helps conspiracy theory formation, the Semmelweis reflex, the continued influence effect (people don't unlearn mis- or disinformation easily once it's been integrated) Anchoring, conservatism, distinction bias, contrast bias, the focusing effect, the framing effect, the money illusion or price illusion and the price of milk; perceiving change - Weber and Fechner, the discrimination threshold, Numerical Cognition Music by Fanette Ronjat More Info Cognitive biases codex Cognitive Biases on Conspiracy-Theories.EU Conspiracy-Theories.EU website About CogNovo Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions website What Is Cognitive Bias? 7 Examples & Resources (Incl. Codex) on Positive Psychology List of Cognitive Biases and Heuristics on The Decision Lab How Our Brains Make Memories in Smithsonian Psychology study uncovers new details about the cognitive underpinnings of belief in conspiracy theories on PsyPost Conspiracy theories in New Scientist 24 cognitive biases that are warping your perception of reality on the World Economic Forum Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: a worldview Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure Social Media, Cognitive Reflection, and Conspiracy Beliefs Cognitive Bias articles on ScienceDirect Cognitive Biases and Brain Biology Help Explain Why Facts Don't Change Minds at the University of Connecticut Cognitive Bias 101: What It Is and How To Overcome It at the Cleveland Clinic 4 widespread cognitive biases and how doctors can overcome them at the American medical Association How Cognitive Biases Influence the Way You Think and Act on VeryWellMind 24 cognitive biases stuffing up your thinking plus cards at yourbias.is Identify Cognitive Biases in Business Decision‑Making at Mailchimp   Follow us on social: Facebook Twitter Other Podcasts by Derek DeWitt DIGITAL SIGNAGE DONE RIGHT - Winner of a 2022 Gold Quill Award, 2022 Gold MarCom Award, 2021 AVA Digital Award Gold, 2021 Silver Davey Award, 2020 Communicator Award of Excellence, and on numerous top 10 podcast lists.  PRAGUE TIMES - A city is more than just a location - it's a kaleidoscope of history, places, people and trends. This podcast looks at Prague, in the center of Europe, from a number of perspectives, including what it is now, what is has been and where it's going. It's Prague THEN, Prague NOW, Prague LATER 

Már felnőtt betegségek kapcsán is használható a Semmelweis Egyetem ingyenes, tünetellenőrző alkalmazása. A gyermekek esetében már korábban is bizonyított, ezúttal pedig bővült a paletta. Kovács Eszter az applikáció ötletgazdája avatott minket a részletekbe. Facebook: www.facebook.com/petofiradio/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/petofiradio/

* List of Discoveries Squeezing Evolution: Did you know that dinosaurs ate rice before rice evolved? That turtle shells existed forty million years before turtle shells began evolving? That insects evolved tongues for eating from flowers 70 million years before flowers evolved? And that birds appeared before birds evolved? The fossil record is a wonderful thing. And more recently, only a 40,000-year squeeze, Neanderthal had blood types A, B, and O, shocking evolutionists but expected to us here at Real Science Radio! Sit back and get ready to enjoy another instant classic, today's RSR "list show" on Evolution's Big Squeeze! Our other popular list shows include: - scientists doubting Darwin - evidence against whale evolution - problems with 'the river carved the canyon' - carbon 14 everywhere it shouldn't be - dinosaur still-soft biological tissue - solar system formation problems - evidence against the big bang - evidence for the global flood - genomes that just don't fit - and our list of not so old things! (See also rsr.org/sq2 and rsr.org/sq3!) * Evolution's Big Squeeze: Many discoveries squeeze the Darwinian theory's timeframe and of course without a workable timeframe there is no workable theory. Examples, with their alleged (and falsified) old-earth timeframes, include: - Complex skeletons existed 9 million years before they were thought to have evolved, before even the "Cambrian explosion".- Butterflies existed 10 million years before they were thought to have evolved. - Parrots existed "much earlier than had been thought", in fact, 25 million years before they were thought to have evolved. - Cephalopod fossils (squids, cuttlefish, etc.) appear 35 million years before they were able to propagate. - Turtle shells 40 million years before turtle shells began evolving - Trees began evolving 45 million years before they were thought to evolve - Spores appearing 50 million years before the plants that made them (not unlike footprints systematically appearing "millions of years before" the creatures that made them, as affirmed by Dr. Marcus Ross, associate professor of geology). - Sponges existed 60 million years before they were believed to have evolved. - Dinosaurs ate rice before it evolved Example - Insect proboscis (tongue) in moths and butterflies 70 million years before previously believed has them evolving before flowers. - Arthropod brains fully developed with central nervous system running to eyes and appendages just like modern arthropods 90 million years earlier than previously known (prior to 2021, now, allegedly 310mya) - 100 million years ago and already a bird - Fossil pollen pushes back plant evolution 100 million years. - Mammalian hair allegedly 100-million-years-old show that, "the morphology of hair cuticula may have remained unchanged throughout most of mammalian evolution", regarding the overlapping cells that lock the hair shaft into its follicle. - Piranha-like flesh-eating teeth (and bitten prey) found pushing back such fish 125 million years earlier than previously claimed   - Shocking organic molecules in "200 million-years-old leaves" from ginkgoes and conifers show unexpected stasis. - Plant genetic sophistication pushed back 200 million years. - Jellyfish fossils (Medusoid Problematica :) 200 million years earlier than expected; here from 500My ago. - Green seaweed 200 million years earlier than expected, pushed back now to a billion years ago!  - The acanthodii fish had color vision 300 million years ago, but then, and wait, Cheiracanthus fish allegedly 388 million years ago already had color vision. - Color vision (for which there is no Darwinian evolutionary small-step to be had, from monochromatic), existed "300 million years ago" in fish, and these allegedly "120-million-year-old" bird's rod and cone fossils stun researchers :) - 400-million-year-old Murrindalaspis placoderm fish "eye muscle attachment, the eyestalk attachment and openings for the optic nerve, and arteries and veins supplying the eyeball" The paper's author writes, "Of course, we would not expect the preservation of ancient structures made entirely of soft tissues (e.g. rods and cone cells in the retina...)." So, check this next item... :) - And... no vertebrates in the Cambrian? Well, from the journal Nature in 2014, a "Lower-Middle Cambrian... primitive fish displays unambiguous vertebrate features: a notochord, a pair of prominent camera-type eyes, paired nasal sacs, possible cranium and arcualia, W-shaped myomeres, and a post-anal tail" Primitive? - Fast-growing juvenile bone tissue, thought to appear in the Cretaceous, has been pushed back 100 million years: "This pushes the origin of fibrolamellar bone in Sauropterygia back from the Cretaceous to the early Middle Triassic..."- Trilobites "advanced" (not the predicted primitive) digestion "525 million" years ago - And there's this, a "530 million year old" fish, "50 million years before the current estimate of when fish evolved" - Mycobacterium tuberculosis 100,000 yr-old MRCA (most recent common ancestor) now 245 million- Fungus long claimed to originate 500M years ago, now found at allegedly 950 Mya (and still biological "the distant past... may have been much more 'modern' than we thought." :) - A rock contained pollen a billion years before plants evolved, according to a 2007 paper describing "remarkably preserved" fossil spores in the French Alps that had undergone high-grade metamorphism - 2.5 billion year old cyanobacteria fossils (made of organic material found in a stromatolite) appear about "200 million years before the [supposed] Great Oxidation Event". - 2.7 billion year old eukaryotes (cells with a nucleus) existed (allegedly) 1 billion years before expected - 3.5 billion year "cell division evidently identical to that of living filamentous prokaryotes." - And even older cyanobacteria! At 220 million years earlier than thought, per Nature's 3.7 billion year old dating of stromatolites! - The universe and life itself (in 2019 with the universe dated a billion, now, no, wait, two billion!, years younger than previously thought, that's not only squeezing biological but also astronomical evolution, with the overall story getting really tight) - Mantis shrimp, with its rudimentary color but advanced UV vision, is allegedly ancient. - Hadrosaur teeth, all 1400 of them, were "more complex than those of cows, horses, and other well-known modern grazers." Professor stunned by the find! (RSR predicts that, by 2030 just to put an end date on it, more fossils will be found from the geologic column that will be more "advanced" as compared to living organisms, just like this hadrosaur and like the allegedly 100M year old hagfish  fossil having more slime glands than living specimens.)  - Trace fossils "exquisitely preserved" of mobile organisms (motility) dated at 2.1 billion years ago, a full 1.5 billion earlier than previously believed - Various multicellular organisms allegedly 2.1 billion years old, show multicellularity 1.5 billion years sooner than long believed   - Pre-sauropod 26,000-pound dinosaur "shows us that even as far back as 200 million years ago, these animals had already become the largest vertebrates to ever walk the Earth." - The Evo-devo squeeze, i.e., evolutionary developmental biology, as with rsr.org/evo-devo-undermining-darwinism. - Extinct Siberian one-horned rhinos coexisted with mankind. - Whale "evolution" is being crushed in the industry-wide "big squeeze". First, geneticist claims whales evolved from hippos but paleontologists say hippos evolved tens of millions of years too late! And what's worse than that is that fossil finds continue to compress the time available for whale evolution. To not violate its own plot, the Darwinist story doesn't start animals evolving back into the sea until the cast includes land animals suitable to undertake the legendary journey. The recent excavation of whale fossils on an island of the Antarctic Peninsula further compresses the already absurdly fast 10 million years to allegedly evolve from the land back to the sea, down to as little as one million years. BioOne in 2016 reported a fossil that is "among the oldest occurrences of basilosaurids worldwide, indicating a rapid radiation and dispersal of this group since at least the early middle Eocene." By this assessment, various techniques produced various published dates. (See the evidence that falsifies the canonical whale evolution story at rsr.org/whales.) * Ancient Hierarchical Insect Society: "Thanks to some well-preserved remains, researchers now believe arthropod social structures have been around longer than anyone ever imagined. The encased specimens of ants and termites recently studied date back [allegedly] 100 million years." Also from the video about "the bubonic plague", the "disease is well known as a Middle Ages mass killer... Traces of very similar bacteria were found on [an allegedly] 20-million-year-old flea trapped in amber." And regarding "Caribbean lizards... Even though they are [allegedly] 20 million years old, the reptiles inside the golden stones were not found to differ from their contemporary counterparts in any significant way. Scientists attribute the rarity [Ha! A rarity or the rule? Check out rsr.org/stasis.] to stable ecological surroundings." * Squeezing and Rewriting Human History: Some squeezing simply makes aspects of the Darwinian story harder to maintain while other squeezing contradicts fundamental claims. So consider the following discoveries, most of which came from about a 12-month period beginning in 2017 which squeeze (and some even falsify) the Out-of-Africa model: - find two teeth and rewrite human history with allegedly 9.7 million-year-old teeth found in northern Europe (and they're like Lucy, but "three times older") - date blue eyes, when humans first sported them, to as recently as 6,000 years ago   - get mummy DNA and rewrite human history with a thousand years of ancient Egyptian mummy DNA contradicting Out-of-Africa and demonstrating Out-of-Babel - find a few footprints and rewrite human history with allegedly 5.7 million-year-old human footprints in Crete - re-date an old skull and rewrite human history with a very human skull dated at 325,000 years old and redated in the Journal of Physical Anthropology at about 260,000 years old and described in the UK's Independent, "A skull found in China [40 years ago] could re-write our entire understanding of human evolution." - date the oldest language in India, Dravidian, with 80 derivatives spoken by 214 million people, which appeared on the subcontinent only about 4,500 years ago, which means that there is no evidence for human language for nearly 99% of the time that humans were living in Asia. (Ha! See rsr.org/origin-of-language for the correct explanation.) - sequence a baby's genome and rewrite human history with a 6-week old girl buried in Alaska allegedly 11,500 years ago challenging the established history of the New World. (The family buried this baby girl just beneath their home like the practice in ancient Mesopotamia, the Hebrews who sojourned in Egypt, and in Çatalhöyük in southern Turkey, one of the world's most ancient settlements.) - or was that 130,000? years ago as the journal Nature rewrites human history with a wild date for New World site - and find a jawbone and rewrite human history with a modern looking yet allegedly 180,000-year-old jawbone from Israel which "may rewrite the early migration story of our species" by about 100,000 years, per the journal Science - re-date a primate and lose yet another "missing link" between "Lucy" and humans, as Homo naledi sheds a couple million years off its age and drops from supposedly two million years old to (still allegedly) about 250,000 years old, far too "young" to be the allegedly missing link - re-analysis of the "best candidate" for the most recent ancestor to human beings, Australopithecus sediba, turns out to be a juvenile Lucy-like ape, as Science magazine reports work presented at the American Association of Physical Anthropologists 2017 annual meeting - find skulls in Morocco and "rewrite human history" admits the journal Nature, falsifying also the "East Africa" part of the canonical story - and from the You Can't Make This Stuff Up file, NPR reports in April 2019, Ancient Bones And Teeth Found In A Philippine Cave May Rewrite Human History. :) - Meanwhile, whereas every new discovery requires the materialists to rewrite human history, no one has had to rewrite Genesis, not even once. Yet, "We're not claiming that the Bible is a science textbook. Not at all. For the textbooks have to be rewritten all the time!"  - And even this from Science: "humans mastered the art of training and controlling dogs thousands of years earlier than previously thought."- RSR's Enyart commented on the Smithsonian's 2019 article on ancient DNA possibly deconstructing old myths...  This Smithsonian article about an ancient DNA paper in Science Advances, or actually, about the misuse of such papers, was itself a misuse. The published research, Ancient DNA sheds light on the genetic origins of early Iron Age Philistines, confirmed Amos 9:7 by documenting the European origin of the biblical Philistines who came from the island of Caphtor/Crete. The mainstream media completely obscured this astounding aspect of the study but the Smithsonian actually stood the paper on its head. [See also rsr.org/archaeology.]* Also Squeezing Darwin's Theory: - Evolution happens so slowly that we can't see it, yet - it happens so fast that millions of mutations get fixed in a blink of geologic time AND: - Observing a million species annually should show us a million years of evolution, but it doesn't, yet - evolution happens so fast that the billions of "intermediary" fossils are missing AND: - Waiting for helpful random mutations to show up explains the slowness of evolution, yet - adaption to changing environments is often immediate, as with Darwin's finches Finches Adapt in 17 Years, Not 2.3 Million: Charles Darwin's finches are claimed to have taken 2,300,000 years to diversify from an initial species blown onto the Galapagos Islands. Yet individuals from a single finch species on a U.S. Bird Reservation in the Pacific were introduced to a group of small islands 300 miles away and in at most 17 years, like Darwin's finches, they had diversified their beaks, related muscles, and behavior to fill various ecological niches. So Darwin's finches could diversify in just 17 years, and after 2.3 million more years, what had they evolved into? Finches! Hear this also at rsr.org/lee-spetner and see Jean Lightner's review of the Grants' 40 Years. AND: - Fossils of modern organisms are found "earlier" and "earlier" in the geologic column, and - the "oldest" organisms are increasingly found to have anatomical, proteinaceous, prokaryotic, and eukaryotic sophistication and similarity to "modern" organisms AND: - Small populations are in danger of extinction (yet they're needed to fix mutations), whereas - large populations make it impossible for a mutation to become standard AND: - Mutations that express changes too late in an organism's development can't effect its fundamental body plan, and - mutations expressed too early in an organism's development are fatal (hence among the Enyart sayings, "Like evolving a vital organ, most major hurdles for evolutionary theory are extinction-level events.") AND: - To evolve flight, you'd get bad legs - long before you'd get good wings AND: - Most major evolutionary hurdles appear to be extinction-level events- yet somehow even *vital* organs evolve (for many species, that includes reproductive organs, skin, brain, heart, circulatory system, kidney, liver, pancreas, stomach, small intestines, large intestines, lungs -- which are only a part of the complex respiration system) AND: - Natural selection of randomly taller, swifter, etc., fish, mammals, etc. explains evolution yet - development of microscopic molecular machines, feedback mechanisms, etc., which power biology would be oblivous to what's happening in Darwin's macro environment of the entire organism AND: - Neo-Darwinism suggests genetic mutation as the engine of evolution yet - the there is not even a hypothesis for modifying the vast non-genetic information in every living cell including the sugar code, electrical code, the spatial (geometric) code, and the epigenetic code AND: - Constant appeals to "convergent" evolution (repeatedly arising vision, echolocation, warm-bloodedness, etc.) - undermine most Darwinian anatomical classification especially those based on trivialities like odd or even-toed ungulates, etc. AND: - Claims that given a single species arising by abiogenesis, then - Darwinism can explain the diversification of life, ignores the science of ecology and the (often redundant) biological services that species rely upon AND: - humans' vastly superior intelligence indicates, as bragged about for decades by Darwinists, that ape hominids should have the greatest animal intelligence, except that - many so-called "primitive" creatures and those far distant on Darwin's tee of life, exhibit extraordinary rsr.org/animal-intelligence even to processing stimuli that some groups of apes cannot AND: - Claims that the tree of life emerges from a single (or a few) common ancestors - conflict with the discoveries of multiple genetic codes and of thousands of orphan genes that have no similarity (homology) to any other known genes AND (as in the New Scientist cover story, "Darwin Was Wrong about the tree of life", etc.): - DNA sequences have contradicted anatomy-based ancestry claims - Fossil-based ancestry claims have been contradicted by RNA claims - DNA-based ancestry claims have been contradicted by anatomy claims - Protein-based ancestry claims have been contradicted by fossil claims. - And the reverse problem compared to a squeeze. Like finding the largest mall in America built to house just a kid's lemonade stand, see rsr.org/200 for the astounding lack of genetic diversity in humans, plants, and animals, so much so that it could all be accounted for in just about 200 generations! - The multiplied things that evolved multiple times - Etc. * List of Ways Darwinists Invent their Tree of Life, aka Pop Goes the Weasle – Head and Shoulders, Knees and Toes: Evolutionists change their selection of what evidence they use to show 'lineage', from DNA to fossils to genes to body plans to teeth to many specific anatomical features to proteins to behavior to developmental similarities to habitat to RNA, etc. and to a combination of such. Darwinism is an entire endeavor based on selection bias, a kind of logical fallacy. By anti-science they arbitrarily select evidence that best matches whichever evolutionary story is currently preferred." -Bob E. The methodology used to create the family tree edifice to show evolutionary relationships classifies the descent of organisms based on such attributes as odd-toed and even-toed ungulates. Really? If something as wildly sophisticated as vision allegedly evolved multiple times (a dozen or more), then for cryin' out loud, why couldn't something as relatively simple as odd or even toes repeatedly evolve? How about dinosaur's evolving eggs with hard shells? Turns out that "hard-shelled eggs evolved at least three times independently in dinosaurs" (Nature, 2020). However, whether a genus has an odd or even number of toes, and similar distinctions, form the basis for the 150-year-old Darwinist methodology. Yet its leading proponents still haven't acknowledged that their tree building is arbitrary and invalid. Darwin's tree recently fell anyway, and regardless, it has been known to be even theoretically invalid all these many decades. Consider also bipedalism? In their false paradigm, couldn't that evolve twice? How about vertebrate and non-vertebrates, for that matter, evolving multiple times? Etc., etc., etc. Darwinists determine evolutionary family-tree taxonomic relationships based on numbers of toes, when desired, or on hips (distinguishing, for example, dinosaur orders, until they didn't) or limb bones, or feathers, or genes, or fossil sequence, or neck bone, or..., or..., or... Etc. So the platypus, for example, can be described as evolving from pretty much whatever story would be in vogue at the moment...   * "Ancient" Protein as Advanced as Modern Protein: A book review in the journal Science states, "the major conclusion is reached that 'analyses made of the oldest fossils thus far studied do not suggest that their [allegedly 145-million year-old] proteins were chemically any simpler than those now being produced.'" 1972, Biochemistry of Animal Fossils, p. 125 * "Ancient" Lampreys Just Modern Lampreys with Decomposed Brain and Mouth Parts: Ha! Researches spent half-a-year documenting how fish decay. RSR is so glad they did! One of the lessons learned? "[C]ertain parts of the brain and the mouth that distinguish the animals from earlier relatives begin a rapid decay within 24 hours..." :) * 140-million Year Old Spider Web: The BBC and National Geographic report on a 140-million year old spider web in amber which, as young-earth creationists expect, shows threads that resemble silk spun by modern spiders. Evolutionary scientists on the otherhand express surprise "that spider webs have stayed the same for 140 million years." And see the BBC. * Highly-Credentialed Though Non-Paleontologist on Flowers: Dr. Harry Levin who spent the last 15 years of a brilliant career researching paleontology presents much evidence that flowering plants had to originate not 150 million years ago but more than 300 million years ago. (To convert that to an actual historical timeframe, the evidence indicates flowers must have existed prior to the time that the strata, which is popularly dated to 300 mya, actually formed.) * Rampant Convergence: Ubiquitous appeals to "convergent" evolution (vision, echolocation, warm-bloodedness, icthyosaur/dolphin anatomy, etc.), all allegedly evolving multiple times, undermines anatomical classification based on trivialities like odd or even-toed ungulates, etc. * Astronomy's Big Evolution Squeeze: - Universe a billion, wait, two billion, years younger than thought   (so now it has to evolve even more impossibly rapidly) - Sun's evolution squeezes biological evolution - Galaxies evolving too quickly - Dust evolving too quickly - Black holes evolving too quickly - Clusters of galaxies evolving too quickly. * The Sun's Evolution Squeezes Life's Evolution: The earlier evolutionists claim that life began on Earth, the more trouble they have with astrophysicists. Why? They claim that a few billion years ago the Sun would have been far more unstable and cooler. The journal Nature reports that the Faint young Sun paradox remains for the "Sun was fainter when the Earth was young, but the climate was generally at least as warm as today". Further, our star would shoot out radioactive waves many of which being violent enough to blow out Earth's atmosphere into space, leaving Earth dead and dry like Mars without an atmosphere. And ignoring the fact that powerful computer simulators cannot validate the nebula theory of star formation, if the Sun had formed from a condensing gas cloud, a billion years later it still would have been emitting far less energy, even 30% less, than it does today. Forget about the claimed one-degree increase in the planet's temperature from man-made global warming, back when Darwinists imagine life arose, by this just-so story of life spontaneously generating in a warm pond somewhere (which itself is impossible), the Earth would have been an ice ball, with an average temperature of four degrees Fahrenheit below freezing! See also CMI's video download The Young Sun. * Zircons Freeze in Molten Eon Squeezing Earth's Evolution? Zircons "dated" 4 to 4.4 billion years old would have had to freeze (form) when the Earth allegedly was in its Hadean (Hades) Eon and still molten. Geophysicist Frank Stacey (Cambridge fellow, etc.) has suggested they may have formed above ocean trenches where it would be coolest. One problem is that even further squeezes the theory of plate tectonics requiring it to operate two billion years before otherwise claimed. A second problem (for these zircons and the plate tectonics theory itself) is that ancient trenches (now filled with sediments; others raised up above sea level; etc.) have never been found. A third problem is that these zircons contain low isotope ratios of carbon-13 to carbon-12 which evolutionists may try to explain as evidence for life existing even a half-billion years before they otherwise claim. For more about this (and to understand how these zircons actually did form) just click and then search (ctrl-f) for: zircon character. * Evolution Squeezes Life to Evolve with Super Radioactivity: Radioactivity today breaks chromosomes and produces neutral, harmful, and fatal birth defects. Dr. Walt Brown reports that, "A 160-pound person experiences 2,500 carbon-14 disintegrations each second", with about 10 disintergrations per second in our DNA. Worse for evolutionists is that, "Potassium-40 is the most abundant radioactive substance in... every living thing." Yet the percentage of Potassium that was radioactive in the past would have been far in excess of its percent today. (All this is somewhat akin to screws in complex machines changing into nails.) So life would have had to arise from inanimate matter (an impossibility of course) when it would have been far more radioactive than today. * Evolution of Uranium Squeezed by Contrasting Constraints: Uranium's two most abundant isotopes have a highly predictable ratio with 235U/238U equaling 0.007257 with a standard deviation of only 0.000017. Big bang advocates claim that these isotopes formed in distant stellar cataclysms. Yet that these isotopes somehow collected in innumerable small ore bodies in a fixed ratio is absurd. The impossibility of the "big bang" explanation of the uniformity of the uranium ratio (rsr.org/bb#ratio) simultaneously contrasts in the most shocking way with its opposite impossibility of the missing uniform distribution of radioactivity (see rsr.org/bb#distribution) with 90% of Earth's radioactivity in the Earth's crust, actually, the continental crust, and even at that, preferentially near granite! A stellar-cataclysmic explanation within the big bang paradigm for the origin of uranium is severely squeezed into being falsified by these contrasting constraints. * Remarkable Sponges? Yes, But For What Reason? Study co-author Dr. Kenneth S. Kosik, the Harriman Professor of Neuroscience at UC Santa Barbara said, "Remarkably, the sponge genome now reveals that, along the way toward the emergence of animals, genes for an entire network of many specialized cells evolved and laid the basis for the core gene logic of organisms that no longer functioned as single cells." And then there's this: these simplest of creatures have manufacturing capabilities that far exceed our own, as Degnan says, "Sponges produce an amazing array of chemicals of direct interest to the pharmaceutical industry. They also biofabricate silica fibers directly from seawater in an environmentally benign manner, which is of great interest in communications [i.e., fiber optics]. With the genome in hand, we can decipher the methods used by these simple animals to produce materials that far exceed our current engineering and chemistry capabilities." Kangaroo Flashback: From our RSR Darwin's Other Shoe program: The director of Australia's Kangaroo Genomics Centre, Jenny Graves, that "There [are] great chunks of the human genome… sitting right there in the kangaroo genome." And the 20,000 genes in the kangaroo (roughly the same number as in humans) are "largely the same" as in people, and Graves adds, "a lot of them are in the same order!" CMI's Creation editors add that "unlike chimps, kangaroos are not supposed to be our 'close relatives.'" And "Organisms as diverse as leeches and lawyers are 'built' using the same developmental genes." So Darwinists were wrong to use that kind of genetic similarity as evidence of a developmental pathway from apes to humans. Hibernating Turtles: Question to the evolutionist: What happened to the first turtles that fell asleep hibernating underwater? SHOW UPDATE Of Mice and Men: Whereas evolutionists used a very superficial claim of chimpanzee and human genetic similarity as evidence of a close relationship, mice and men are pretty close also. From the Human Genome Project, How closely related are mice and humans?, "Mice and humans (indeed, most or all mammals including dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, and apes) have roughly the same number of nucleotides in their genomes -- about 3 billion base pairs. This comparable DNA content implies that all mammals [RSR: like roundworms :)] contain more or less the same number of genes, and indeed our work and the work of many others have provided evidence to confirm that notion. I know of only a few cases in which no mouse counterpart can be found for a particular human gene, and for the most part we see essentially a one-to-one correspondence between genes in the two species." * Related RSR Reports: See our reports on the fascinating DNA sequencing results from roundworms and the chimpanzee's Y chromosome! * Genetic Bottleneck, etc: Here's an excerpt from rsr.org/why-was-canaan-cursed... A prediction about the worldwide distribution of human genetic sequencing (see below) is an outgrowth of the Bible study at that same link (aka rsr.org/canaan), in that scientists will discover a genetic pattern resulting from not three but four sons of Noah's wife. Relevant information comes also from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) which is not part of any of our 46 chromosomes but resides outside of the nucleus. Consider first some genetic information about Jews and Arabs, Jewish priests, Eve, and Noah. Jews and Arabs Biblical Ancestry: Dr. Jonathan Sarfati quotes the director of the Human Genetics Program at New York University School of Medicine, Dr. Harry Ostrer, who in 2000 said: Jews and Arabs are all really children of Abraham … And all have preserved their Middle Eastern genetic roots over 4,000 years. This familiar pattern, of the latest science corroborating biblical history, continues in Dr. Sarfati's article, Genesis correctly predicts Y-Chromosome pattern: Jews and Arabs shown to be descendants of one man. Jewish Priests Share Genetic Marker: The journal Nature in its scientific correspondence published, Y Chromosomes of Jewish Priests, by scie

Welcome to another riveting episode of Hearts of Oak, where we delve deep into the stories that shape our world. Today, we're honored to host a distinguished guest, a board-certified obstetrician gynecologist with a background in maternal fetal medicine, whose journey through the medical field has been nothing short of extraordinary.   In this episode, our guest shares insights from a career marked by a relentless pursuit of truth, especially in light of the tumultuous events surrounding public health strategies during recent global crises. We'll explore how personal experiences, influenced by historical figures like Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis, have shaped his approach to medicine, emphasizing the importance of standing firm against mainstream narratives when patient safety is at stake.   Our discussion will take a critical look at how health policies, driven by a complex web of government, pharmaceutical, and medical organizations, have impacted the most vulnerable among us. We'll tackle the uncomfortable truths about medical ethics, the silence of influential societal groups, and the personal sacrifices made by those who speak out against the status quo.   This episode promises to be a beacon of awareness, urging us all to question, to learn, and to remember the importance of integrity in the face of systemic challenges. So, join us as we navigate through the ethical dilemmas of our time, inspired by a physician's commitment to never compromise patient care for profit or popularity.   Stay with us as we uncover the layers of this compelling story, right here on Hearts of Oak. Connect with Dr James Thorp Freedom In Truth | Substack   Recorded on 17.10.24   *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast.   Connect with Hearts of Oak...

THESE ARE THE PAGES straight from her dissertation! This SPECIAL episode is from the INTRODUCTION to the 407-page dissertation titled: "A Rhetorical Analysis of Genesis 2-3." Learn what she presented to the jury at the University of Strasbourg, France, on why to think again about the Hebrew words and word patterns in Genesis 2-3.Get a copy? Go to Tru316.com and select the Resources tab. The Tru316 Foundation (www.Tru316.com) is the home of The Eden Podcast with Bruce C. E. Fleming where we “true” the verse of Genesis 3:16. The Tru316 Message is that “God didn't curse Eve (or Adam) or limit woman in any way.” Once Genesis 3:16 is made clear the other passages on women and men become clear too. You are encouraged to access the episodes of Seasons 1-11 of The Eden Podcast for teaching on the seven key passages on women and men. Are you a reader? We invite you to get from Amazon the four books by Bruce C. E. Fleming in The Eden Book Series (Tru316.com/trubooks). Would you like to support the work of the Tru316 Foundation? You can become a Tru Partner here: www.Tru316.com/partner

20241017 - 07 Semmelweis Help applikáció - Vonalban: Dr. Torzsa Péter by Bochkor

Sosem találná ki, mi a legveszélyesebb keresőszó! ICT Global     2024-10-14 05:04:12     Infotech Adele Napjaink egyik legnépszerűbb énekesnője, a visszavonulását nemrégiben bejelentő Adele nevéhez számos rekord köthető. Például az ő nevére a legrizikósabb rákeresni a neten - állítja a McAfee. Hamarosan büntetik a kibervédelmi regisztrációt elmulasztó cégeket Mínuszos     2024-10-14 10:33:35     Infotech Európai Unió Az Európai Unió Tanácsa Több ezer cégre vonatkozik Magyarországon a felülvizsgált uniós kibervédelmi irányelv, a NIS2, az előírt regisztrációt elmulasztó társaságok akár szankciókra is számíthatnak a hatóságtól – hívta fel a figyelmet az EY nemzetközi tanácsadó cég. A NIS2 irányelv célja, hogy az Európai Unió tagállamai hatékonyan vehessék fel a küzdelmet a folyamatosan n Történelmi tettet hajtott végre a SpaceX: robotkarral kapták el a Starship hordozórakétáját Rakéta     2024-10-14 06:06:04     Tudomány Világűr Robot Elon Musk Mars SpaceX Elon Musk vállalata a fejlesztés alatt álló Mars-rakéta ötödik tesztjére nem akármilyen célt tűzött ki maga elé, hiszen első alkalommal próbálkoztak meg azzal, hogy a felbocsátás után vissza is hozzák a Super Heavy névre keresztelt hordozórakétát. Az Amazon az MI-re bízza a vásárlási útmutatást ITBusiness     2024-10-14 06:06:37     Infotech Mesterséges intelligencia Cipő Amazon Az Amazon egyre inkább szeretné az MI-t bevonni a vásárlási folyamatba, ami azt jelenti, hogy a mesterséges intelligencia dönthet arról, mit vásárolunk. A vállalat alkalmazni kezdte az MI által készített vásárlási útmutatók bevezetését, amelyek körülbelül 100 terméktípusra vonatkoznak, beleértve a tévéket, kutyaeledelt, cipőket és arckrémeket is. A Yann LeCun: még olyan MI-t sem tudunk építeni, ami olyan okos, mint egy macska Bitport     2024-10-14 09:50:00     Infotech Mesterséges intelligencia Nobel-díj Negyven éve jó barátja a Nobel-díjat elnyerő Geoffrey Hintonnak, de nem ért egyet vele a mesterséges intelligencia veszélyeit illetően. Szerinte az LLM-ek csak ügyes gépek, az általános MI pedig több évtizednyire van. Megújul az Áhk-mutató – könnyebb lesz a mobiltarifák összehasonlítása Digital Hungary     2024-10-14 12:17:00     Mobiltech NMHH Az NMHH 2015. január óta publikálja minden hónap elején a legjelentősebb hazai szolgáltatók kínálatában aktuálisan elérhető lakossági mobil- és vezetékestelefon-díjcsomagok átlagos havi költségeit, azaz az ÁHK-értékeket. Az nmhh.hu/ahk címen elérhető oldal segít eligazodni a sokféle – a különböző tarifák mellett egyre változatosabb szolgáltatásokat Leleplezhették a Nemzetközi Űrállomás utódját 24.hu     2024-10-14 15:17:27     Tudomány Világűr Űrállomás A Nemzetközi Űrállomástól hamarosan el kell búcsúznunk, de van már egy potenciális utód. A Google szerint gondot okozna, ha felnyitnák a Play Áruházat IT café     2024-10-14 11:02:00     Infotech USA Google A Google egy amerikai bírói döntés felfüggesztését kérte, szerintük ugyanis nagy károkat okozna a Play Áruház felnyitása a nagyobb verseny érdekében. Linux alkalmazásokat is lehet majd futtatni az Androidon PC Fórum     2024-10-14 08:00:00     Mobiltech Telefon Google Mobiltelefon Android Linux Az androidos mobiltelefonok és táblagépek tulajdonosai hamarosan rendkívül sok olyan program használatára lehetnek majd képesek, amik eredetileg Linux-ra készültek. A Google ugyanis állítólag már dolgozik egy olyan technológián Androidhoz, ami a nyílt forrású operációs rendszerre íródott alkalmazások saját mobilos rendszerén történő futtatását is l Semmelweis segít a bajban - már felnőtteknek is HWSW     2024-10-14 09:33:13     Infotech A tavaly nyáron bemutatott applikáció 2.0-s verziója október közepétől felnőtt betegségeket is ismer. Ismeretlen objektumot talált a NASA a Marson hirado.hu     2024-10-14 04:33:00     Tudomány Világűr NASA Mars Minden eddiginél tisztább felvételt készített a Perseverance Mars-járó a vörös bolygóról. A Jupiter egyik holdja lehet az emberiség menekülőútja vg.hu     2024-10-14 10:19:54     Külföld Világűr NASA A NASA ötmilliárd dollárból kutatja, lehet-e élet az Europán. Páratlan fegyvert kaptak az ukránok Elon Musktól, most mégis az oroszok aratnak győzelmeket vele Portfolio     2024-10-14 09:49:00     Külföld Ukrajna Elon Musk Műhold The Washington Post Az orosz hadsereg egyre növekvő mértékben használja a Starlink műholdas internetet Ukrajnában, ami hozzájárult többek között Vuhledár elfoglalásához is – tudósított a The Washington Post. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Sosem találná ki, mi a legveszélyesebb keresőszó! ICT Global     2024-10-14 05:04:12     Infotech Adele Napjaink egyik legnépszerűbb énekesnője, a visszavonulását nemrégiben bejelentő Adele nevéhez számos rekord köthető. Például az ő nevére a legrizikósabb rákeresni a neten - állítja a McAfee. Hamarosan büntetik a kibervédelmi regisztrációt elmulasztó cégeket Mínuszos     2024-10-14 10:33:35     Infotech Európai Unió Az Európai Unió Tanácsa Több ezer cégre vonatkozik Magyarországon a felülvizsgált uniós kibervédelmi irányelv, a NIS2, az előírt regisztrációt elmulasztó társaságok akár szankciókra is számíthatnak a hatóságtól – hívta fel a figyelmet az EY nemzetközi tanácsadó cég. A NIS2 irányelv célja, hogy az Európai Unió tagállamai hatékonyan vehessék fel a küzdelmet a folyamatosan n Történelmi tettet hajtott végre a SpaceX: robotkarral kapták el a Starship hordozórakétáját Rakéta     2024-10-14 06:06:04     Tudomány Világűr Robot Elon Musk Mars SpaceX Elon Musk vállalata a fejlesztés alatt álló Mars-rakéta ötödik tesztjére nem akármilyen célt tűzött ki maga elé, hiszen első alkalommal próbálkoztak meg azzal, hogy a felbocsátás után vissza is hozzák a Super Heavy névre keresztelt hordozórakétát. Az Amazon az MI-re bízza a vásárlási útmutatást ITBusiness     2024-10-14 06:06:37     Infotech Mesterséges intelligencia Cipő Amazon Az Amazon egyre inkább szeretné az MI-t bevonni a vásárlási folyamatba, ami azt jelenti, hogy a mesterséges intelligencia dönthet arról, mit vásárolunk. A vállalat alkalmazni kezdte az MI által készített vásárlási útmutatók bevezetését, amelyek körülbelül 100 terméktípusra vonatkoznak, beleértve a tévéket, kutyaeledelt, cipőket és arckrémeket is. A Yann LeCun: még olyan MI-t sem tudunk építeni, ami olyan okos, mint egy macska Bitport     2024-10-14 09:50:00     Infotech Mesterséges intelligencia Nobel-díj Negyven éve jó barátja a Nobel-díjat elnyerő Geoffrey Hintonnak, de nem ért egyet vele a mesterséges intelligencia veszélyeit illetően. Szerinte az LLM-ek csak ügyes gépek, az általános MI pedig több évtizednyire van. Megújul az Áhk-mutató – könnyebb lesz a mobiltarifák összehasonlítása Digital Hungary     2024-10-14 12:17:00     Mobiltech NMHH Az NMHH 2015. január óta publikálja minden hónap elején a legjelentősebb hazai szolgáltatók kínálatában aktuálisan elérhető lakossági mobil- és vezetékestelefon-díjcsomagok átlagos havi költségeit, azaz az ÁHK-értékeket. Az nmhh.hu/ahk címen elérhető oldal segít eligazodni a sokféle – a különböző tarifák mellett egyre változatosabb szolgáltatásokat Leleplezhették a Nemzetközi Űrállomás utódját 24.hu     2024-10-14 15:17:27     Tudomány Világűr Űrállomás A Nemzetközi Űrállomástól hamarosan el kell búcsúznunk, de van már egy potenciális utód. A Google szerint gondot okozna, ha felnyitnák a Play Áruházat IT café     2024-10-14 11:02:00     Infotech USA Google A Google egy amerikai bírói döntés felfüggesztését kérte, szerintük ugyanis nagy károkat okozna a Play Áruház felnyitása a nagyobb verseny érdekében. Linux alkalmazásokat is lehet majd futtatni az Androidon PC Fórum     2024-10-14 08:00:00     Mobiltech Telefon Google Mobiltelefon Android Linux Az androidos mobiltelefonok és táblagépek tulajdonosai hamarosan rendkívül sok olyan program használatára lehetnek majd képesek, amik eredetileg Linux-ra készültek. A Google ugyanis állítólag már dolgozik egy olyan technológián Androidhoz, ami a nyílt forrású operációs rendszerre íródott alkalmazások saját mobilos rendszerén történő futtatását is l Semmelweis segít a bajban - már felnőtteknek is HWSW     2024-10-14 09:33:13     Infotech A tavaly nyáron bemutatott applikáció 2.0-s verziója október közepétől felnőtt betegségeket is ismer. Ismeretlen objektumot talált a NASA a Marson hirado.hu     2024-10-14 04:33:00     Tudomány Világűr NASA Mars Minden eddiginél tisztább felvételt készített a Perseverance Mars-járó a vörös bolygóról. A Jupiter egyik holdja lehet az emberiség menekülőútja vg.hu     2024-10-14 10:19:54     Külföld Világűr NASA A NASA ötmilliárd dollárból kutatja, lehet-e élet az Europán. Páratlan fegyvert kaptak az ukránok Elon Musktól, most mégis az oroszok aratnak győzelmeket vele Portfolio     2024-10-14 09:49:00     Külföld Ukrajna Elon Musk Műhold The Washington Post Az orosz hadsereg egyre növekvő mértékben használja a Starlink műholdas internetet Ukrajnában, ami hozzájárult többek között Vuhledár elfoglalásához is – tudósított a The Washington Post. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Jo Nesbø új könyvében a bűn útján nincs megállás – Olvass bele! Könyves Magazin     2024-09-17 18:53:57     Könyv A Vérségi kötelékkel Jo Nesbø egy korábbi kötetét folytatja, főszereplője pedig egy gátlástalan testvérpár. Mutatunk egy részletet az új thrillerből! Fotó: Stian Broch Tíz, streamingre frissen felkerült film, amit érdemes megnézni a héten Player     2024-09-18 04:33:02     Film Összeszedtünk tíz olyan alkotást, amely a héten kerül be valamelyik streamingszolgáltató kínálatába, és amellyel érdemes lesz tenni egy próbát. Ezen a héten nevetni, sírni és rettegni is fogunk. Hamarosan a mozikban: Magyar feliratos előzetest kapott Timothée Chalamet Bob Dylan-filmje, a Sehol se otthon Mafab     2024-09-18 05:43:02     Film Mozi Timothée Chalamet Bob Dylan James Mangold készülő zenei életrajzi filmjében, a Bob Dylan élete által inspirált Sehol se otthonban Timothée Chalamet alakítja az ikonikus énekes-dalszerzőt. Itt az első magyar feliratos előzetes. Megszűnés küszöbén a nagy magyar költőnk emlékszobája Librarius     2024-09-17 17:59:19     Könyv Alapítvány Gáborjáni-Szabó Réka vagyok, Szabó Lőrinc unokája. A róla elnevezett Alapítvány és Emlékszoba elnökeként fordulok most Önökhöz.   Az idei év 5 legjobb true crime dokusorozata a Netflixen és az HBO Maxon in.hu     2024-09-17 20:47:02     Film Netflix Dokumentumfilm HBO Bár talán nem szívesen valljuk be, imádjuk a bűnügyi dokumentumfilmeket. Abba inkább nem akarunk túlságosan belegondolni, hogy miért is izgatnak bennünket ennyire ezek a valódi bűnügyek, de mindenesetre jó hosszan a képernyő elé szegeznek.Ebben az évben nem volt hiány igazi bűnügyi dokumentumfilmekből, amelyek tele vannak megrázó és gyakran traumat Nicole Kidman sorozata részről részre rosszabb NLC     2024-09-17 18:06:33     Film Nicole Kidman Gyönyörű sziget, annál is gyönyörűbb emberek, gazdagság, szép ruhák, intrikák, flörtölések, viszonyok és egy rejtélyes gyilkosság. Minden adott egy tökéletes sorozathoz. Hát mi romolhatna el? A tökéletes párban egyszerűen minden. Átadták a Színikritikusok díját: első alkalommal volt hármas holtverseny, Marosvásárhelyre került a legtöbb díj kultura.hu     2024-09-17 22:07:00     Színpad Románia Színház A Színházi Kritikusok Céhe idén 45. alkalommal adta át a Színikritikusok díját, amellyel a 2023/2024-es évad kiemelkedő színházi teljesítményeit ismeri el. A szeptember 17-i gálát a Trafóban tartották, amelyen a Loupe Színházi Társulás közreműködött. Megvannak a Hypewriter döntősei Márkamonitor     2024-09-18 05:06:04     Film Szlovákia Szerbia Pályázatok Összesen nyolc alkotó és alkotópáros jutott be a Hypewriter nemzetközi sorozatötlet-pályázat döntőjébe, ők lesznek azok, akik az októberi pitch-fórumon személyesen mutatják be pályaművüket. Az idén hatodik alkalommal meghirdetett versenyre a világ minden tájáról, hat kontinens negyven országából jelentkeztek, közülük magyar, szerb, szlovák és horvá Szlovákia Borbély Alexandra filmjével indul az Oscarért refresher.hu     2024-09-17 17:32:00     Film Szlovákia Borbély Alexandra Iveta Grófová "Emma és a halálfejes lepke" című filmje a "Semmelweis" ellen versenyezhet a legjobb nemzetközi filmnek járó Oscar-díjért. Jeremy Allen White hálás, amiért hamarosan Bruce Springsteent alakíthatja majd Hamu és Gyémánt     2024-09-18 07:34:07     Film Emmy A mackó sztárja, a kétszeres Emmy-díjas Jeremy Allen White elárulta, milyen érzések kavarognak benne azzal kapcsolatban, hogy hamarosan ő játszhatja Bruce Springsteent a Deliver Me From Nowhere című életrajzi filmben. Weisz Fanni: "Minden pillanatunkat megváltoztatja a kicsi kincsünk érkezése" Story     2024-09-18 07:00:53     Bulvár Weisz Fanni Pár hónappal ezelőtt derült égből villámcsapásként ért mindenkit az örömhír: titokzatos párja eljegyezte a hallássérült modellt, aki gyermeket hord a szíve alatt. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Jo Nesbø új könyvében a bűn útján nincs megállás – Olvass bele! Könyves Magazin     2024-09-17 18:53:57     Könyv A Vérségi kötelékkel Jo Nesbø egy korábbi kötetét folytatja, főszereplője pedig egy gátlástalan testvérpár. Mutatunk egy részletet az új thrillerből! Fotó: Stian Broch Tíz, streamingre frissen felkerült film, amit érdemes megnézni a héten Player     2024-09-18 04:33:02     Film Összeszedtünk tíz olyan alkotást, amely a héten kerül be valamelyik streamingszolgáltató kínálatába, és amellyel érdemes lesz tenni egy próbát. Ezen a héten nevetni, sírni és rettegni is fogunk. Hamarosan a mozikban: Magyar feliratos előzetest kapott Timothée Chalamet Bob Dylan-filmje, a Sehol se otthon Mafab     2024-09-18 05:43:02     Film Mozi Timothée Chalamet Bob Dylan James Mangold készülő zenei életrajzi filmjében, a Bob Dylan élete által inspirált Sehol se otthonban Timothée Chalamet alakítja az ikonikus énekes-dalszerzőt. Itt az első magyar feliratos előzetes. Megszűnés küszöbén a nagy magyar költőnk emlékszobája Librarius     2024-09-17 17:59:19     Könyv Alapítvány Gáborjáni-Szabó Réka vagyok, Szabó Lőrinc unokája. A róla elnevezett Alapítvány és Emlékszoba elnökeként fordulok most Önökhöz.   Az idei év 5 legjobb true crime dokusorozata a Netflixen és az HBO Maxon in.hu     2024-09-17 20:47:02     Film Netflix Dokumentumfilm HBO Bár talán nem szívesen valljuk be, imádjuk a bűnügyi dokumentumfilmeket. Abba inkább nem akarunk túlságosan belegondolni, hogy miért is izgatnak bennünket ennyire ezek a valódi bűnügyek, de mindenesetre jó hosszan a képernyő elé szegeznek.Ebben az évben nem volt hiány igazi bűnügyi dokumentumfilmekből, amelyek tele vannak megrázó és gyakran traumat Nicole Kidman sorozata részről részre rosszabb NLC     2024-09-17 18:06:33     Film Nicole Kidman Gyönyörű sziget, annál is gyönyörűbb emberek, gazdagság, szép ruhák, intrikák, flörtölések, viszonyok és egy rejtélyes gyilkosság. Minden adott egy tökéletes sorozathoz. Hát mi romolhatna el? A tökéletes párban egyszerűen minden. Átadták a Színikritikusok díját: első alkalommal volt hármas holtverseny, Marosvásárhelyre került a legtöbb díj kultura.hu     2024-09-17 22:07:00     Színpad Románia Színház A Színházi Kritikusok Céhe idén 45. alkalommal adta át a Színikritikusok díját, amellyel a 2023/2024-es évad kiemelkedő színházi teljesítményeit ismeri el. A szeptember 17-i gálát a Trafóban tartották, amelyen a Loupe Színházi Társulás közreműködött. Megvannak a Hypewriter döntősei Márkamonitor     2024-09-18 05:06:04     Film Szlovákia Szerbia Pályázatok Összesen nyolc alkotó és alkotópáros jutott be a Hypewriter nemzetközi sorozatötlet-pályázat döntőjébe, ők lesznek azok, akik az októberi pitch-fórumon személyesen mutatják be pályaművüket. Az idén hatodik alkalommal meghirdetett versenyre a világ minden tájáról, hat kontinens negyven országából jelentkeztek, közülük magyar, szerb, szlovák és horvá Szlovákia Borbély Alexandra filmjével indul az Oscarért refresher.hu     2024-09-17 17:32:00     Film Szlovákia Borbély Alexandra Iveta Grófová "Emma és a halálfejes lepke" című filmje a "Semmelweis" ellen versenyezhet a legjobb nemzetközi filmnek járó Oscar-díjért. Jeremy Allen White hálás, amiért hamarosan Bruce Springsteent alakíthatja majd Hamu és Gyémánt     2024-09-18 07:34:07     Film Emmy A mackó sztárja, a kétszeres Emmy-díjas Jeremy Allen White elárulta, milyen érzések kavarognak benne azzal kapcsolatban, hogy hamarosan ő játszhatja Bruce Springsteent a Deliver Me From Nowhere című életrajzi filmben. Weisz Fanni: "Minden pillanatunkat megváltoztatja a kicsi kincsünk érkezése" Story     2024-09-18 07:00:53     Bulvár Weisz Fanni Pár hónappal ezelőtt derült égből villámcsapásként ért mindenkit az örömhír: titokzatos párja eljegyezte a hallássérült modellt, aki gyermeket hord a szíve alatt. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Másnaposok szerencséje: A sárga ruhás nő Mafab     2024-09-10 17:29:01     Film Los Angeles Szinkron Egyik kedvenc filmem, amit bármikor újra tudok nézni. Egy rendkívül egyszerű történetű film, ahol egy hisztis nő ámokfutását látjuk Los Angeles éjszakai forgatagában. Önmagában ez nem fogja a filmet kiemelni a posványból, ahhoz kellett a parádés szereposztás és a kiváló magyar szinkron.Számomra a filmet olyan apróságok teszik naggyá, ami ritka még Megvan melyik magyar filmet küldjük az Oscarra Tudás.hu     2024-09-11 05:38:54     Film Mozi Az Nemzeti Filmintézet tájékoztatása szerint a hivatalos magyar Oscar nevezésről döntő szakmai testület 18 magyar egészestés mozifilm közül választotta ki az Oscar-filmet. A Semmelweis című mozifilmet nevezi Magyarország nemzetközi film kategóriában az Oscar-díjra a magyar jelölésről határozó szakmai testület döntése alapján – közölte az MTI-vel a Vígszínház: új játszóhely bejelentésével és Vígnappal indul az új évad Márkamonitor     2024-09-11 05:06:06     Színpad Színház Vidnyánszky Attila Vígszínház Alföldi Róbert A Vígszínház 2024/25-ös évadának első bemutatója szeptember 21-én a Liliomfi lesz ifj. Vidnyánszky Attila rendezésében, míg a Pesti Színházban október 5-én az Egy nő anatómiája magyarországi ősbemutatóját láthatják a nézők Alföldi Róbert rendezésében. A Vígszínházban Az ember, aki elvesztette az időt című darabot Bodó Viktor, a Büszkeség és balítél Különleges koncert Rhoda Scott-tal a Dohány utcai zsinagógában kultura.hu     2024-09-11 07:03:06     Zene Fesztiválok Koncert Zsinagóga Radics Gigi Nemzetközi és világhírű zenészek, hagyományos és kortárs stílusok, innovatív zenei megközelítések – ezeket ígéri a Zsidó Kulturális Fesztivál részeként hallható Masters & Pieces Vol. 2. című koncert Rhoda Scott-tal, Lisztes Jenővel, Roby Lakatossal és Radics Gigivel szeptember 12-én a Dohány utcai zsinagógában. Elkezdődött az új Harry Potter-sorozat szereplőválogatása in.hu     2024-09-10 20:47:03     Film Írország Harry Potter HBO J. K. Rowling Elkezdődött a következő Harry Potter, Ron Weasley és Hermione Granger szerepét játszó színésztrió keresése.Hétfőn nyílt castingot hirdettek meg, amelyen az Egyesült Királyság és Írország gyermekei jelentkezhettek a főszerepekre az HBO készülő televíziós adaptációjához, amely JK Rowling bestseller könyvén alapul.Az HBO a Variety-nek megerősítette a A nagyhatalmú házmesterektől a kitelepítettekig – 10 történelemről szóló könyv, amit már alig várunk Könyves Magazin     2024-09-10 18:32:58     Könyv Budapest rejtett titkai, az orosz politika legitimációs mítoszai, illetve anekdoták, amik megmagyarázzák az európai politika eredőit. Ősszel számos izgalmas, a közeli és a távolabbi történelem eddig ismeretlen részleteit feltáról kötet érkezik. Mutatjuk a legizgalmasabbakat. 5 film, ami megváltoztatja a divatról kialakított képünket Hamu és Gyémánt     2024-09-11 07:34:03     Film Luxus Dokumentumfilm Amellett, hogy művészeti és önkifejezési forma, a divat sokak szerint elsősorban egyfajta státuszszimbólum, amely a luxusról és exhibicionizmusról szól. Néhány dokumentumfilmnek köszönhetően azonban ma már sokkal jobban beláthatunk ennek a sokszor nagyon bonyolult iparnak a kulisszái mögé. Ezekben a filmekben tervezők, modellek és újságírók mesélne Miért A remény rabjai lett a világ kedvenc filmje? 24.hu     2024-09-10 17:25:20     Film Éppen harminc éve mutatták be A remény rabjait, amely hosszú ideje vezeti a világ legnagyobb filmes adatbázisának toplistáját. Miért? Leforgatták az Oscar-díjas Nemes Jeles László Árva című új filmjét Noizz     2024-09-11 09:17:14     Film Golden Globe BAFTA Nemes Jeles László Befejeződött Nemes Jeles László legújabb filmjének forgatása. Az Árva című alkotást a forgatókönyvet is jegyző Oscar-, Golden Globe-, és Bafta díjas Saul fiát jegyző rendező családjának története ihlette, főszereplője a 12 éves Barabás Bojtorján. Rekordszámú gazdával tér vissza az RTL népszerű társkereső realityje rtl.hu     2024-09-10 19:43:22     Film Valóságshow Házasodna a gazda Szeptember 23-tól minden hétköznap este látható lesz a Házasodna a gazda. Az RTL nagysikerű társkereső realityje már a hetedik évaddal tér vissza a képernyőre. A Fókusz riportjából kiderül, kik lesznek idén a társkereső gazdák.  Sajgál Erika Götz Annáról: "A nehezebbik utat választotta, és kivirágzott benne" Story     2024-09-11 11:00:46     Bulvár A két életrevaló színésznő már néhány évtizede jól ismerte egymást, de barátságuk csak pár éve mélyült el igazán. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Másnaposok szerencséje: A sárga ruhás nő Mafab     2024-09-10 17:29:01     Film Los Angeles Szinkron Egyik kedvenc filmem, amit bármikor újra tudok nézni. Egy rendkívül egyszerű történetű film, ahol egy hisztis nő ámokfutását látjuk Los Angeles éjszakai forgatagában. Önmagában ez nem fogja a filmet kiemelni a posványból, ahhoz kellett a parádés szereposztás és a kiváló magyar szinkron.Számomra a filmet olyan apróságok teszik naggyá, ami ritka még Megvan melyik magyar filmet küldjük az Oscarra Tudás.hu     2024-09-11 05:38:54     Film Mozi Az Nemzeti Filmintézet tájékoztatása szerint a hivatalos magyar Oscar nevezésről döntő szakmai testület 18 magyar egészestés mozifilm közül választotta ki az Oscar-filmet. A Semmelweis című mozifilmet nevezi Magyarország nemzetközi film kategóriában az Oscar-díjra a magyar jelölésről határozó szakmai testület döntése alapján – közölte az MTI-vel a Vígszínház: új játszóhely bejelentésével és Vígnappal indul az új évad Márkamonitor     2024-09-11 05:06:06     Színpad Színház Vidnyánszky Attila Vígszínház Alföldi Róbert A Vígszínház 2024/25-ös évadának első bemutatója szeptember 21-én a Liliomfi lesz ifj. Vidnyánszky Attila rendezésében, míg a Pesti Színházban október 5-én az Egy nő anatómiája magyarországi ősbemutatóját láthatják a nézők Alföldi Róbert rendezésében. A Vígszínházban Az ember, aki elvesztette az időt című darabot Bodó Viktor, a Büszkeség és balítél Különleges koncert Rhoda Scott-tal a Dohány utcai zsinagógában kultura.hu     2024-09-11 07:03:06     Zene Fesztiválok Koncert Zsinagóga Radics Gigi Nemzetközi és világhírű zenészek, hagyományos és kortárs stílusok, innovatív zenei megközelítések – ezeket ígéri a Zsidó Kulturális Fesztivál részeként hallható Masters & Pieces Vol. 2. című koncert Rhoda Scott-tal, Lisztes Jenővel, Roby Lakatossal és Radics Gigivel szeptember 12-én a Dohány utcai zsinagógában. Elkezdődött az új Harry Potter-sorozat szereplőválogatása in.hu     2024-09-10 20:47:03     Film Írország Harry Potter HBO J. K. Rowling Elkezdődött a következő Harry Potter, Ron Weasley és Hermione Granger szerepét játszó színésztrió keresése.Hétfőn nyílt castingot hirdettek meg, amelyen az Egyesült Királyság és Írország gyermekei jelentkezhettek a főszerepekre az HBO készülő televíziós adaptációjához, amely JK Rowling bestseller könyvén alapul.Az HBO a Variety-nek megerősítette a A nagyhatalmú házmesterektől a kitelepítettekig – 10 történelemről szóló könyv, amit már alig várunk Könyves Magazin     2024-09-10 18:32:58     Könyv Budapest rejtett titkai, az orosz politika legitimációs mítoszai, illetve anekdoták, amik megmagyarázzák az európai politika eredőit. Ősszel számos izgalmas, a közeli és a távolabbi történelem eddig ismeretlen részleteit feltáról kötet érkezik. Mutatjuk a legizgalmasabbakat. 5 film, ami megváltoztatja a divatról kialakított képünket Hamu és Gyémánt     2024-09-11 07:34:03     Film Luxus Dokumentumfilm Amellett, hogy művészeti és önkifejezési forma, a divat sokak szerint elsősorban egyfajta státuszszimbólum, amely a luxusról és exhibicionizmusról szól. Néhány dokumentumfilmnek köszönhetően azonban ma már sokkal jobban beláthatunk ennek a sokszor nagyon bonyolult iparnak a kulisszái mögé. Ezekben a filmekben tervezők, modellek és újságírók mesélne Miért A remény rabjai lett a világ kedvenc filmje? 24.hu     2024-09-10 17:25:20     Film Éppen harminc éve mutatták be A remény rabjait, amely hosszú ideje vezeti a világ legnagyobb filmes adatbázisának toplistáját. Miért? Leforgatták az Oscar-díjas Nemes Jeles László Árva című új filmjét Noizz     2024-09-11 09:17:14     Film Golden Globe BAFTA Nemes Jeles László Befejeződött Nemes Jeles László legújabb filmjének forgatása. Az Árva című alkotást a forgatókönyvet is jegyző Oscar-, Golden Globe-, és Bafta díjas Saul fiát jegyző rendező családjának története ihlette, főszereplője a 12 éves Barabás Bojtorján. Rekordszámú gazdával tér vissza az RTL népszerű társkereső realityje rtl.hu     2024-09-10 19:43:22     Film Valóságshow Házasodna a gazda Szeptember 23-tól minden hétköznap este látható lesz a Házasodna a gazda. Az RTL nagysikerű társkereső realityje már a hetedik évaddal tér vissza a képernyőre. A Fókusz riportjából kiderül, kik lesznek idén a társkereső gazdák.  Sajgál Erika Götz Annáról: "A nehezebbik utat választotta, és kivirágzott benne" Story     2024-09-11 11:00:46     Bulvár A két életrevaló színésznő már néhány évtizede jól ismerte egymást, de barátságuk csak pár éve mélyült el igazán. A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Send us a textListen in as we explore Dr Semmelweis.

Send us a textCan an ancient biblical story and a 19th-century medical breakthrough teach us about the importance of obedience and faith? Join us as we unravel the gripping tale of Ignace Semmelweis, the Hungarian physician who defied medical norms and saved countless lives by championing hand hygiene. We draw a powerful parallel to the story of Moses and Pharaoh, emphasizing how both Semmelweis and Moses faced fierce resistance despite their groundbreaking contributions. This episode reveals humanity's deep-rooted resistance to change, even when faced with irrefutable evidence.We then reflect on the spiritual journey of Moses and Aaron, who, despite their initial doubts, were empowered by God to challenge Pharaoh. Discover how the symbolic act of Aaron's staff transforming into a serpent exemplified God's ultimate authority, shaking the very foundations of Egyptian beliefs. Through this, we discuss the transformative power of faith and obedience, reminding us that when we step out and trust in God's guidance, we are equipped to overcome any obstacle.Finally, we explore the dramatic confrontation between divine and demonic powers, illustrating the futility of opposing God's will. As Aaron's serpent staff swallowed the serpents of Pharaoh's sorcerers, we see a vivid demonstration of God's supremacy over all false idols. This powerful episode concludes with an urgent call to faith and obedience, urging listeners to repent and believe, while encouraging believers to trust in God's provision amidst life's struggles. Tune in for an enriching blend of historical insight and timeless spiritual truths that will inspire and challenge your faith.Support the show

The biography show where famous guests pick someone from history they admire or they love. Our only rule is they must be dead. Today neurosurgeon Dr Henry Marsh chooses “the saviour of mothers” Dr Ignaz Semmelweis The Hungarian doctor discovered the link between childbirth and puerperal fever in 19th century Vienna but he was ridiculed, ignored and demoted as his discovery challenged the medical orthodoxy. Post-mortems at the time were carried out by doctors before they practised on wards, with no hygiene step between the two. Semmelweis recommended handwashing for doctors, and gathered statistics to prove his theory.Despite the evidence, the medical establishment was resistant to change and Semmelweis became increasingly traumatised, frustrated and angry. In his final months, he seems to have also developed an organic brain disorder which led to his friends and wife having him restrained and sectioned in a mental asylum where he subsequently died from injuries. Nominator Dr Henry Marsh is the author of Do No Harm: Stories of Life, Death and Brain Surgery. With the playwright Stephen Brown who cowrote Dr Semmelweis with Sir Mark Rylance. Presented by Matthew Parris and produced for BBC Studios Audio by Ellie Richold

Dr Zsofia Drobni is a Cardiology Fellow at Semmelweis University, Budapest, HU. Her research focuses on the utility of cardiac CT and MRI in patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies, with a specific focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Dr Drobni graduated in 2017 from Semmelweis University, in Hungary, and continued her PhD studies at Semmelweis. Her PhD thesis was on “new perspectives of CT-based cardiovascular risk assessment”. From 2019, Dr Drobni was a research fellow at the Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University. Dr Drobni is currently the president of and founded the Hungarian Chapter of IC-OS.

In this episode of "Transmissible: A Public Health Podcast," we journey to mid-19th century Vienna to uncover the tragic yet inspiring story of Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis. Dr. Semmelweis's revolutionary epidemiologic work proved the importance of handwashing in preventing childbed fever, yet he faced fierce resistance from the medical establishment of his time. Despite the initial rejection and personal sacrifices, his discoveries eventually transformed medical practices and saved countless lives. Citations: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902590/ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(96)06481-1/fulltext https://www.amazon.com/Gordis-Epidemiology-David-Celentano-ScD/dp/0323552293 https://magazine.punch.co.uk/gallery-image/Victorian-Era-Cartoons/G0000czGdMEOaVXY/I00009EE9wIky71Q https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ignaz-Semmelweis

Protagonista di questa storia è Ignác Fülöp Semmelweis, un medico dottorando, che per primo ebbe l'assurda idea di non operare con le mani lerce.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

(NOTAS COMPLETAS Y ENLACES DEL CAPÍTULO AQUÍ: https://www.jaimerodriguezdesantiago.com/kaizen/195-el-poder-de-las-herejias/)«La verdad se busca por sí misma; y al buscar aquello que se busca por sí mismo, uno solo está preocupado por encontrarlo... El buscador de la verdad no es quien estudia los escritos de los antiguos y confía en ellos, sino más bien quien duda de su fe en ellos y cuestiona lo que recogen, quien se somete al argumento y la demostración, y no a los dichos de un ser humano cuya naturaleza está llena de todo tipo de imperfección y deficiencia. [...] Si aprender la verdad es su objetivo, es su deber hacerse enemigo de todo lo que lee, y [...] atacarlo desde todos los lados. También debe sospechar de sí mismo [...] para [...] evitar caer en cualquier prejuicio o indulgencia. Si sigue este camino, se le revelarán las verdades [...]»Algo parecido a esta defensa del pensamiento crítico dejó escrito el primer personaje de los muchos que vamos a mencionar hoy. Digo parecido, porque lo hizo en árabe antiguo y esto es una traducción más que modernizada. Su autor fue Hasan Ibn-al-Haytham, más conocido en Occidente como Alhazen y considerado por muchos como el primer científico. Y nació en el año 965, en un mundo en el que no existían los relojes, ni los telescopios, ni los microscopios, ni casi nada de lo que hoy nos es normal. Comenzó estudiando la religión, pero pronto acabó desencantado con sus dogmas incuestionables y con la manera en la que volvía a unas personas contra otras. Así que decidió volcarse en la búsqueda de la verdad objetiva, pura e imparcial. Se dedicó a estudiar a fondo la realidad.Y así, 8 siglos antes de que se inventara la fotografía, Alhazen fue el primero en dar una explicación completa a un fenómeno que se conocía desde tiempos de la antigua Grecia: cómo, en una sala oscura con una única apertura en uno de sus muros, al colarse los rayos de luz por ella, se proyectaba en la pared opuesta la imagen del exterior, invertida tanto horizontal como verticalmente. Es lo que siglos más tarde, Kepler llamaría cámara oscura. La palabra «cámara», de hecho, viene del árabe y de los textos de Alhazen, que influyeron a gente como Leonardo da Vinci, Descartes o el propio Kepler. Y es que en sus libros sobre óptica fue capaz de desmontar las teorías griegas sobre el funcionamiento de la luz, que aún en su época se consideraban correctas, y de describir, a través de sus experimentos, la anatomía y el funcionamiento de nuestros ojos, como un sistema óptico. Para escribir esos libros, eso sí, Alhazen tuvo que recurrir a medidas extremas. Tras despertar la ira del califa de turno, tuvo que hacerse el loco, literalmente. Sólo recluyéndose en su casa durante años pudo dedicarse a descifrar la realidad. Y es que, Alhazen, como muchas de las personas que cambiaron el mundo, fue considerado un hereje.Y hoy vamos a celebrar la herejía, porque se me han juntado distintas lecturas que he ido acumulando en los últimos meses con una idea que tengo a medio cocinar sobre la necesidad que tenemos de poner a prueba mucho de lo que damos por sentado en nuestra sociedad, en nuestras empresas… y en nuestra vida en general. Eso sí, no sé muy bien qué va a salir de aquí, ya te lo digo. Patrocinador del capítulo: PortobelloStreet.es ¿Te gusta kaizen? Apoya el podcast uniéndote a la Comunidad y accede a contenidos y ventajas exclusivas: https://www.jaimerodriguezdesantiago.com/comunidad-kaizen/

Show Notes and Transcript Professor Dalgleish has spoken out about his concerns of the mRNA jab for years. And for the last 2 he has written about the rise of cancers he believes are linked to the jab.  We start by looking back at Professor Dalgleish's career and ask why he chose to speak up and what was the response from his colleagues?  He then delves into this rise of turbo cancers and why he had to sound the alarm despite the struggle to get full transparency from the authorities and "Move on, nothing to see here" is the reply to most requests for data.  His fellow cancer specialists agree with his concerns, but the authorities simply will not listen. Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London. Article in The Conservative Woman: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/massive-cancer-deaths-study-vindicates-my-warnings-over-covid-boosters/ Japan Data: https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/ The Death of Science:      https://amzn.eu/d/2w1wxk4 Interview recorded 15.4.24 Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  heartsofoak.org/connect/ SHOP                  heartsofoak.org/shop/ TRANSCRIPT (Hearts Of Oak) I'm delighted to have Professor Angus Dalgleish with us today. Professor, thank you so much for your time. (Prof Angus Dalgleish) You're welcome. Great to have you. And of course, people will have read, I'm sure, many of your articles, more recently in The Conservative Woman, back before that, I think in certainly The Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail. And since 1991, I know you've been the Professor of Oncology at St. George's University, London. And during this time, you focused on the immunology of cancer and conducted numerous clinical trials involving a variety of vaccines and immune therapy. I know you're well known for your contributions on HIV AIDS research. And of course, you stood for UKIP, which is another part of your story back in 2015. There's so many areas, Professor, I want to talk to you, but maybe you have got a background in understanding vaccines. We'll get on to, I think, the first article you wrote, certainly I read, was back two years ago, actually, on the madness of vaccinating children against COVID, and they started discussing cancer and what you were seeing back in December 2022. I certainly saw it in the Conservative Woman but maybe I can ask you just for a little bit of your background and then we can get on to what you have seen with your patients and the data. Okay well with regards to my background I mean it's, I've been reminded of something I'd forgotten and that is that I'm probably one of the only people in the country who's been an NHS consultant in virology, immunology, general medicine, and oncology. So when I had my chair in oncology, I had a great background in immunology and virology, which is what led me to go into tumour immunology. And I continued working on HIV pathogenesis for several years and worked with colleagues in Norway with designing a very good HIV vaccine, which is the only one that works. But I was staggered that nobody was interested or would support it. And yet the big medical industrial complex, such as the NIH and Big Pharma, kept plowing ahead with vaccines that had the whole envelope in different technologies, and none of them worked. In fact, it was worse than working. They had to stop all these worldwide trials costing billions because the vaccine was worse than the placebo, now so that's a very good entrée as to where I came from with the COVID virus. When that became a pandemic and the sequence became available. I was called up by my colleagues in Norway saying, would I be happy to do the same process? I help identify the major immunological components and avoid all the unnecessary ones, which is the most important thing. And I said yes, obviously. And we started to plan a MAPA plan when they came back and said, this is not an actual virus, this has been released from the lab in Wuhan or escaped then as we put it and the reasons for this was absolutely plain, is that there were charged inserts around the receptor binding site not one or two but six as well as the fusion site, fusion domain and I looked at that you know, and I had a background because I've done so much work on the HIV receptor, even as a clinician I was you know, had a scientific understanding of interactions and what is required etc and it occurred to me that these inserts some of them had been previously published and, you know, by the Wuhan group, they'd said, aren't we clever? We put this insert in and we made this virus more infectious to human cells. This is very good. They went on with two or three. But here we had one with six inserts. Now, my molecular biology, virology friends all told me, oh, don't get excited. All these things happen at random. And here I then realized what a problem was with science, people are only in their boxes, they don't get out of the boxes. Changes in sequence only matter when they translate into the amino acids which translate into proteins and that's what does the interaction, once the amino acids were translated by these inserts they broke all the rules of the game, they were far too too positively charged, which meant that the virus had been altered so it would act like a fridge magnet. So it would zap onto human cells over and above its natural ACE receptor. And when I realized this, it was 100% I was convinced it could not have come from anywhere else because it had broken the rules of biology. And the rules of biology would have edited out those changes because, put it in a simple way, the charge was around pH 8. The charge of any normal virus is around 6 or less. So it was just a supernatural leap. And that's what convinced me. But the big problem was that having written papers in Nature Science, Lancet on HIV and its receptor and how it causes disease and the epidemiology and got them all in the leading papers. When I pointed this out with my colleagues, Nature, Science, all these papers, Lancet, they all turned us down and said, this data is not in the public interest. Seriously, I've got the copies. It is unbelievable. So I realized then that a discussion about the science was being banned. This led to me, and I'm flagrantly admit that, you know, this ended up in us writing a book called The Death of Science, which is actually available, and I've probably got it somewhere. But this was unbelievable that we suddenly realized everything was being censored. I was told by my own university we were not allowed to discuss or research the origin of the virus. Well, I mean, that was really quite draconian. But then where do so many universities get their funding from these days? They're far too reliant on China. So it clearly comes from that source, the way China stopped the WHA doing their work. Now, I'm just going to mention, this is relevant to what you've asked me to talk about, because when we had that spike protein, we realized it was very fully charged. We also looked at it for a homology with now an epitopes. And 80% of it was similar to the human epitopes, some of them unbelievably identical, platelet factor IV myelin. So we said, do not use this as a vaccine, because it will cause all sorts of terrible side effects. This is how you do it. We've learned from HIV, a vaccine is not how much you can put in it, but how little you can put in it. So you go for the Achilles heels of the structure. So if those structures no longer exist, the virus doesn't exist in any variant. So we actually had a blueprint. And we told everybody about this. We had access to the cabinet, the SAGE, Chief Medical Officer of Science. Who basically deemed it all interesting but not relevant. Can you believe that? But they had a point that there was 150 groups reviewed by a Nature paper, all of them so stupid, I use the word advisedly, that they all said, this is our vaccine. They all used the whole spike protein. Well, it was obvious that you must not use the whole spike protein, in the same way we'd spent 30 years saying don't use the whole HIV envelope. And they still haven't got the process. I mean, it is unbelievable stupidity group thing. And anyhow, so we knew there was going to be a big problem if they use the spike protein with autoimmunity, etc. However, that had nothing to do with my interest with cancer at all. What got my interest in cancer in this was when they brought out the booster program. Now, I've done lots of model work on vaccines, you know, basic research funded by charity, done for industry too. And a basic adage is, if a vaccine needs a booster, it doesn't work. So here we are being forced by the government and all the authorities to have a booster when it was all based on the grounds that people who monitor the effects of people who've been vaccinated, their antibody titer falls off. Well, of course it does. I mean, that's what you want. And that was the basis for doing boosters, to stop it falling off. Well, I knew enough then about the booster is that by the time they were talking about rolling out the booster, we were already in Omicron territory. They were boosting a virus that didn't exist on the grounds that there was crossover. And there was all these species, the booster will give you extra protection from crossover. Well, apart from the fact that we'd widely published and it had been downloaded over a quarter of a million times, our objection to using the spike protein and what you should use for a vaccine, with another group of colleagues, I wrote a review of a virus. Coxsackie viruses and the attempts to vaccinate against them and why they had all failed. And actually, the need for them is greater in animal work than it is in humans. But they all fail because the vaccines against coronavirus lead to antigenic sin or immunological imprinting. Once you are vaccinated against a component of that and you challenge with a different variant, it will only see the first component. And it will not see the variants. But it will make antibodies that will bind to them. And then that enhances infection and this explains why people have just woken up scratched their heads and say why does everybody who gets a booster get infected again with COVID in fact three and a half times more likely according to the big Cleveland study and more than twice as likely according to one published after the second vaccine in BMJ, so this was not a surprise. I couldn't believe why nobody heeded and listened to these warnings. And the people that made the decision. It must have made them in ignorance because they certainly didn't read any of this stuff. Otherwise, they'd have been much more cautious. Now, instead, they were being pushed by Big Pharma, who selected the data. It's now obvious that Pfizer, if they had revealed the data, the VAERS data, nobody in their right mind would ever have approved it. And you've had Clare Craig and Norman Fenton on board. So all I can just point out was I was unaware of this carry on at the time, but they brilliantly pointed out that they did it all on relative risk as opposed to absolute risk and the number needed to vaccinate to prevent. If that data had been presented properly, nobody in their right mind would have approved a vaccine. It's just meaningless to have to vaccinate 120 people to prevent one infection. And when the VAERS data came out, it was clear that if you had a serious adverse event, you had a 3% chance of dying. Whereas if you got COVID, you had less than 1% chance of dying. In fact, a lot, lot less than 1% at the very most. So there was no way anybody should have done it. So I would argue that the Pfizer, and I'm not alone in having said that they went into shenanigans and all sorts of smoke and mirror to hide the truth and get everything approved. But, you know, others, such as the state of Texas, are actually suing them for fraud. So, I mean, it's not exactly, it's an open secret. So get back to the booster and the cap.... Could I just ask you just one little sidestep, I remember reading your numerous articles, I think it's probably in the Daily Mail and I remember thinking Professor Angus is saying, speaking his concerns in a great way to stay within certain restrictions and yet get the message out. And I was reading, thinking, this is exactly what I am hearing as a lay person. And you're explaining from your medical professional background. And those articles in the mainstream media, the newspapers, I think were vital in helping people understand what was happening. And you wrote them in such an intelligent, smart way. Well, thank you very much. With regards to the Daily Mail and the articles, I was staggered by the letter. Sometimes they would print a page of letters in the printed edition, and they were all from people saying, thank you so much for helping us understand just what the hell has been going on. You know that was the great thing, the big problem I had with the Daily Mail as soon as I pointed out that there was a problem with the vaccine, I would get to the draft I'd submit it, it'd be accepted and then it wouldn't appear and it had been censored by the chief editor, as soon as it was a vaccine, we now know why, it's because the mainstream media were paid a fortune to push the narrative by the government. A fortune so big that none of them were prepared to challenge it. The Mail did a fantastic job, and I helped as much as I could on the grounds that the lockdowns were madness, and there's no scientific justification for it. It was absolute madness, even to think of a second one. And many others, Carl Heneghan, et cetera, came up, and I was saying that natural immunity, and I was one of the few clinicians to sign the Great Barrington Declaration because that's what I said we should have done straight from day one. In fact, now in retrospect, my gut feeling we didn't need a vaccine program has been proven to be absolutely true because had we done the vitamin D properly and had one or two other drugs out there, we would not, and I include there, without beating around the bush ivermectin, I think Peter Curry's book is absolutely damning how Fauci and others went out of their way to damp that down. And the only reason they did was because you cannot introduce a vaccine if you've got an effective therapy. I mean, I really do believe it was that bad that they were doing this. And so many people suffered. I think it was criminal. I make no bones about that. But the media wouldn't touch my concerns about the vaccine, which is why I ended up publishing them in the Daily Skeptic and the Conservative Women, who, I must say, they challenge anything that they find they cannot collaborate. Corroborate they they check they do their own referencing and everything so they are very very hot and quite a lot of stuff I've had toned down because of challenges to the refereeing for instance etc, but the stuff that they do put out there they're all very happy about it, now what I did and why you were talking is that when the booster came in, I've said it's a complete waste of time. Not only will it induce antibodies to a virus that doesn't exist, but they will lead to more infection. What I wasn't prepared for was that my patients who I was monitoring carefully, who'd been stable melanoma for years, I had half a dozen of them go down within six to eight weeks of the booster program being wheeled out. And they had relapsed. And some of these had been stable for over 15 years. The average was five to seven. And I knew then something was going on because melanoma patients, once they're induced to be stable with immunotherapy like they all had, because I was using immunotherapy 20, 25 years ago, long before it became popular, I knew there had to be a tremendous immune suppression event going on, life event. It's usually bereavement, severe depression, divorce, bankruptcy. Something that goes over three months to cause this. Yet I was seeing it clear. I reported it. I was told by my own people to shut up and stop frightening the patients. There is no evidence. Get the evidence. So I said, you know, I am a canary in a mine and a man with a red flag. It's up to everybody else to react to this. Now, I was told no. I've subsequently seen a dozen and I've continued to shout. And I saw eight cases within my social and family circle of people who developed leukaemia lymphoma after the booster and so we started to say how is it doing that? When it became evident there was a very good, I mean my own group have done work on this, but to me what really convinced it when other people found that t-cell responses were suppressed after the booster not the first and second but after the booster and the t-cell suppression was so bad they called it exhaustion in cancer patients, well we know that the people who've got cancer under good control, it is t-cells nothing to do with antibodies. So the booster was doing more harm than good, it's suppressing the t-cell response, and then I found papers that was even worse on the grounds that the booster switched the IgG1, immunoglobulin class structure antibodies, from ones that would normally be intent on fighting viruses to one that were tolerizing them, tolerizing the IgG. The sort you induce in transplant patients. So not only had you switched the T cell response off, but you'd sent all the antibodies on to be tolerizing so they didn't reject the transplant. Of course the transplant in this case is the cancer so there's no doubt that it popped up, that was a major reason why it popped up, now why it's important to discuss this now is, having been told to shut up and be quiet, I did get by the way, people from all over the world saying thank you for pointing this out, we've seen exactly the same thing. I mean from America, Canada, South America, Europe, South Africa, Australia, all around the world people said we're seeing exactly the same thing. Well now we have this paper that's come from Japan, it's pure statistical analysis of events over COVID, including all causes of death and this is important, not incidents death, and they noticed there was no increase in death of any cause or cancer during the first one and two waves of COVID. But it started in late 21 and continued to rise, hardly doubling in 22. And so the all-cause in 21 went from a few percentage, three or four, to over 9% in 22. Death from cancer went from 1.1 to 2.2 + in 22 these are small figures but it's a very strong trend because it was in all the cancers, it wasn't just in any one and I got particularly interested because there was no great increase in colorectal cancer, which is what we've seen in the UK in fact the colorectal surgeons were the first to phone me and say we're seeing unbelievable colon cancer in young people, and they've all had the booster vaccine. You know, we think there is something related. So I reacted that there was no signal in Japan. And then remember, they have an incredibly different diet. It's a completely anti-inflammatory diet. So they haven't been primed for colon cancer to take off. But all the ones that were killing them were those that killed them before, but much quicker. But I mentioned mortality. I predicted there would be a massive increase in cancer problems just on lockdown alone because we weren't screening. People weren't coming to with their symptoms. We weren't doing the scanning. We weren't getting them on treatment early. So that alone, I predicted more people would die of that lockdown on cancer than would die from any benefit of lockdown on COVID deaths, which we now know there were zero. I mean I think most people will now agree with that, it was introduced far too late on both occasions, it was introduced just as the hot, the waves were dying out, completely utterly pointless, so I was very aware and actually preached a bit that you know, the problem with this issue is cancer incidence is massive, cancer deaths not nearly as much because we've got very good at treating it and the incidence to death can take several years, so here in Japan you've actually got the death rate clearly rising, it's all very statistical this, in one year two year now, That was finished in 2023, submitted in 2023. If we had the 23 data, I would bet that that would be a doubling again, probably, on the 22 data, because they have shown in the data they've got, it's worse with each booster, not just the first. If you have a fourth and a fifth, it gets worse. And what is great about this paper is it goes into explaining how it's actually induced the cancer early as opposed to just waiting for it to develop which is what I would have expected had it just been suppression of the immune system and one thing they have suggested, which I totally go along with and I hadn't thought of it first-hand myself but I'm fully aware and support it, is that the clotting tendency, these micro-clots that the spike protein causes. Actually would lead to enhancing the cancers to spread and metastasize. And we know that this clotting abnormality occurs in some cancers, prostate and pancreas, and all sorts of unusual things occur, like disseminated intravascular coagulation, etc. Now, this is the sort of thing, that it was being reported in people who died of cancer who'd been vaccinated. Really abnormal clots. If you look at the literature, there's a lot of people pointing out that the autopsy is highly unusual clotting going on. So the fact that that process was actually driving cancer is a very interesting suggestion. It's not proof, but it's yet another reason that might be driving it. In the literature are reports that the spike protein binds to p53 and msh3. These are suppressor genes. If you have mutations in these genes you're much more likely to develop cancer because they normally switch the cancer that has arisen by accident off. They're suppressor genes, they switch it off. So if you compromise your suppressor genes you're much more likely to develop cancer quickly. And I think that this is part of what the Japanese data is showing. I just point out that I don't think there is any ulterior motive in just pointing out what we've seen, whereas I am very concerned that the Office of National Statistics keep changing the rules with data. They stopped reporting the COVID deaths in May 22, and they've been doing adjustments and all sorts of things, which I think, what are they trying to hide? And Carl Heneghan has made a very, and Norman Fenton, made a very big issue of this. Why don't they just release all the data? And I'm convinced that data shows something very similar, just because of what I see. I look around my friends, the number who've gone down with cancer since they had the booster. Which they only had so they could travel in lockdown, and they wanted to have a decent holiday. And he said, you can't get on this plane or this boat unless you have the booster. And so they had the booster. And in two cases, they never, ever going to get on the boat and do the traveling. One of them died very quickly, and I was horrified by it because he'd had perfect treatment, absolute perfect treatment, but still progressed, suggesting there were other mechanisms going on. And another one had a lymphoma that he had years ago it resurfaced rapidly and killed him and his oncologist, I was quite surprised told him, I really can't ignore the fact that this has been stable for years but it's come back as soon as you had the booster and there's a chap in England who's pointing this out, I was a friend of this guy, he's in America. And then I've had other cases which have popped up completely unexpected. In my family, I've had cases of leukaemia uncovered after the boosters and brother-in-laws, etc. So it's really real. And friends who developed aggressive prostate, pancreatic, ovarian cancer since the booster program has been wheeled out. And my main reason for shouting about this is that I am still being told I can have a spring booster to protect myself. I spoke to a friend today and they were talking about their father who was told he had prostate cancer and I think he went for a psa testing, that's to look at how far the cancer is and it was very low it was six or eight, then after the boosters he went for another test and they'd gone up to 170 and was told it spread throughout out the body and that was it and I get those are similar stories you have heard and I'm looking at these studies which are coming out and obviously you, this has just come out, you've just published this in the conservative woman as of when we're recording actually on the 15th, but you need studies I guess to analyse the data and put it together it's one thing having the individual stories, but these studies seem to be telling you what you already had heard in your individual patients. Yes, indeed. I mean, we've been really waiting for proper studies like this, and there seemed to be a real hesitation. I mean, I told everybody who criticized me, well, go away and look at it. You're sitting on the data. You're head of trusts. You're head of of MRC, CRUK, all these things. That's your job. It's not my job. My job is to be the whistle-blower. But as we know, whistle-blowers in the health service are persecuted, and it would have seemed to be the same in science and everything as well. It's been going on a long time. I was reminded yesterday that Semmelweis, who was the first person to point out that the dreadful sepsis deaths in the maternity ward were due to the fact nobody washed their hands, and if you washed their hands, you didn't get it. All his colleagues turned around and said, you're a lunatic, and had him locked up. I mean, I don't think things have changed with this pandemic at all. That's exactly what's going on. It's the death of science. nobody wants to discuss the data whether it be the origin of the virus whether it be with a pandemic it's a good or bad thing whether it be that masks are a good or bad things or that whether we should have been able to early treat as you would any respiratory virus with a good boost of vitamin D, soluble aspirin, intranasal interferon, beclamide, if it goes to the chest all these things I believe, and ivermectin which having looked at all the data, I can understand now why nobody in the establishment wanted it anywhere near a COVID patient because it worked and it saved them and there would be no need for any vaccine whatsoever and Fauci demonized it as a horse de-wormer when it is probably one of the most effective drugs in humans ever in the history of medicine, because it It prevents all sorts of things, river blindness and the liver, all the flukes, et cetera, in Africa and Asia. And may well be a major reason why the incidence of COVID deaths in these places was so low, because they were all on ivermectin and getting good vitamin D, of course. I've just spoken out as these studies are coming out, and we'll put the link to the Japanese study in the description. Of course, it's in that article. As more and more people have spoken out, are you seeing more of your colleagues going public on it? Because surely when the studies are coming out, the data is released, then that's proving what has happened. And therefore, you will get more and more people from the medical community who actually are speaking up and saying, yeah, this is correct. Do you think that will happen? Well, I hope so. I hope so. So the ones that spoke up and said, you're correct, all said, by the way, we've been told to shut up too and not upset the patients. This is like it was a central script written somewhere because they told me the same in America, Canada, Australia, Europe and Britain, that to be quiet. I got carpeted for pointing all these things out and said I was breaking NHS guidelines. And this would go down on my thing as breaking rules. I said, I don't give a damn. All I'm doing is making sure I do no harm. I suggest you do the same. NHS is causing more harm. I think the NHS, one of the reasons it's crippling, it's spending so much time treating the side effects of the vaccine program. And they won't admit it, of course. And I've been doing some medical legal instances where people have clearly been damaged by the vaccine and none of the people concerned will admit it. They just say coincidence. It's just like a tape. And I've spoken to lots of people who had very bad vaccine and had just been really badly treated. They go out of the way to make sure it's not enough for compensation. And I hadn't realized how many people had lost their jobs in the UK because they refused to get vaccinated or they refused to get the booster because they had had such bad bad side effects from the first two. How can you possibly justify that? If you have a bad reaction to a drug, you don't take it again. You don't take another dose and hope it's not as bad this time, which seems to be the NHS and the government's attitude to it. Yeah. Another part is the cancer issue, and obviously seems to be speeding up cancer much faster. That's certainly the people I've talked to. But the other side, and a lot of the media reports have been a shocking cancer amongst younger people. And the journalists, right, they have no idea why…. Yes, they do. this has been happening recently but I mean tell because, it's that concern you think cancer is something you get maybe later on in life but this is happening younger, this changes the very nature of what that is the impact on society. Yes I mean we have seen and there there is a paper showing that there is a real increase in patients under 44. I think it's 19 to 44 a massive increase in cancers and particularly abdominal cancers. So colorectal. We were seeing this before, by the way, in young people in this country, obviously not in Japan. And so I've always said it must be something to do with the diet is driving this, and so do most people. But it seems to have accelerated since the vaccine program came on. But we're seeing all the others. I mean, I was really surprised. We're seeing oesophageal cancer, biliary, liver, pancreatic, upper and lower bowel, weird ones like appendix cancers. You know, incredibly rare. I was contacted by a fellow who said that he'd seen about one of these. He runs a colorectal surgery and he's seen about one in the last five years. And he said, I've seen 13 recently, and they'd all had the vaccine. They were all in young people. So, I mean, so when people get cancers, unusually unexpected. The first thing you should do is say, why? Do they have something in common? Well, they do. The vast majority, again, not all of them, because there's a background incidence, have all had the vaccine or a booster. And that to me is stop the bloody program now, you know instead I'm being told to go and get my spring booster what planet are these people on? This is, since you've spoken up nearly or 18 months or 21 months ago I've seen more and more people write about it, is this the end then of this worldwide experiment of this new type of technology, this mRNA which is massively backfired or is it just how Big Pharma work and then they come up with the mRNA now to fix cancer which is the the latest thing we've heard. Yeah, well, they were always working on that. And I actually, you know, when people tell me I'm a clinician and I don't know what I'm talking about and to shut up, I tell them I know a darn sight more than they do. And especially about the dangers of messenger RNA vaccine, because I was on a scientific advisory board for a company whose subtitle was the messenger RNA vaccine company for five years and I left about seven years ago and they were targeting cancer and they didn't get through, BioNTech had the same thing. Big Pharma and whatever's behind them at far more sinister, has used this pandemic and I mean, when it started I wouldn't even have thought along these lanes. I honestly think it was planned, it's like it was planned to get the messenger rna out, when you go back and you look at the Manhattan project for vaccines and world health, their big issue was why do we make all these vaccines? If we don't have a pandemic we won't make any money, we'll lose money so this really looks like it was all planned, why did Moderna have a patent on sars-2 in February 2019? Why did the German government go ahead and fund an an enormous big vaccine facility in Marburg to produce messenger RNA, long before they were anywhere near being approved. It sounds like the whole thing was part of some sinister plan. And that's what I find really, really concerning. And I've spoken up and on the record. I think the messenger RNA vaccines are an absolute disaster, should be banned. They should be completely, utterly banned. And they are what they say on the till in the early BN Biotech preparations for Pfizer, they have COVID vaccine-gene therapy. Well, that was honest. You don't use gene therapy on a pandemic that kills less than 1% of people. And then you go ahead with the plan, when you know that the people who did die had an average age in the UK of 82, whereas average age of anybody else dying of anything else was 81. So the logical thing for a statistician was to go around and prepare COVID and spray it all around the population and tell them they'll live an extra year longer, because you've got I mean, being very cynical about it. But why would you? You shouldn't do it. Chris Whitty occasionally said some sensible things, but then went on to being beheaded or whatever it is and go along with this madness. He said, you can't use a vaccine unless you've got a death rate of 30% in the main population. You can't justify it if you haven't got the safety data. Why did he not stand up when it was 1% and stop it? Could it be something to do with shut up and you'll get your rewards in the honours list which they all did these people all of them, Vallance, Whitty and all these, I was going to say goons from SAGE, I'll say that again I do, I disagreed with them totally and utterly and even the people working with the vaccines from Oxford, the Astra Zeneca, they all got knighthoods, damehoods everything long before there was any evidence it was of any any benefit. It's unbelievable. When these studies come out, a lay person like myself will think this then starts a catalyst of looking at other countries and wanting the data. But then the flip side is you realize the difficulty of data, and you touched on that. I think you had mentioned that whenever I saw you speak at Andrew Bridgen's event the end of last year in Parliament, the lack of data. It seems like there is British data. there is Israeli data and there does seem some Japanese data. Many other countries seem to have a complete void, but the UK government don't even want to release any of the data. Will this force them to release it? Will this mean there are possible financial penalties? I mean, these companies getting sued? Where does this go whenever one country brings out a study like this, which is so comprehensive? Well, I think you'll get other countries that will do it. I really do. I mean, Australia, who behaved appallingly during the pandemic, I mean, they were run by a bunch of, not just clowns, but really ghoulish clowns who seem to relish in power and locking down and God knows what else, have mandatory vaccines. Well, at least they have. They've had a lot of revolt over this, and they finally had a formal Australian Commission on Excess Deaths. And I've been asked to give evidence for it as have some other people who've raised their voice and we'll make it very very clear what's going on, some of the senators now in Australia know exactly what was going on and they're baying for blood as it were and the thing that I'm baying for, why were the people like me in Australia and I worked in Australia for seven years by the way, I did flying doctor for a year and I did internal medicine and oncology. I know it very very well, why did these doctors who thought like me, I'm going to look after the patients, this, that and the other, they got struck off if they they wouldn't go along with this madness. I mean, it's unbelievable. It was inhumane. And at least that commission is going to uncover it. I think our COVID inquiry is a whitewash to kick the can down the road for so long. By the time it comes to the conclusions, nothing to see here, nobody, no one person was guilty. There'll be lessons to learn. No, there won't be any lessons to learn unless they hold people to account, unless we withdraw from the WHO, this madness, this treaty they want us to sign up to, once they're all signed up, they release the next pandemic and they will have another round of vaccines for you. I mean, I thought this was absolute madness to even think like that. But George Orwell saw it all 70 years ago, 70 years plus. And I mean, it's just unbelievable. I re-read 1984 and Animal Farm when I went on holiday recently. They had a package, and I'd read them 40, 50 years ago, a long time. If I hadn't have read them, I'd have thought, oh, somebody's seen through the lockdown and written these in lockdown as to where it could lead once you give the power to the governments to bully the thing. Yeah, it's incredible. They could have been written in the lockdown, but he wrote them 50 years ago. He saw what was coming. Obviously, it was about the communist model coming out of Russia and the implications. But I never thought I would live long enough to see democracy being destroyed by the same tentacles of control that emerged due to the COVID. And it's given them a power to interfere in everything else. I mean, a power to block all kinds. I've lost my faith totally in justice in the UK, probably worldwide. The Postmaster scandal was unbelievable. when the guy was told you're the only one, I remember that's what I was told when I made a great fuss, you're the only one, it transpires there were dozens and dozens of us who made, said the same thing to the government, they ignored, there were hundreds and hundreds of postmasters who said the same thing that they ignored and now, you know we're going we're having the same absolute nonsense over climate control. I mean I went and researched climate control, I didn't have to do much research before I realized that the data is very clear out there that carbon dioxide rises when the world warms. And it is actually something that's trying to do something good about it. And it does. It's a heavy gas, falls to the ground, encourages plant growth, tree growth, which produces more oxygen. It is. It's like a controller. It's like a thermostat. It is not the cause. And you've got all these morons, and I use the word advisedly, and people like Ed Miliband should springs to mind this guy is a total moron, who thinks that if you stop the co2 from the cars, this, that and the other, you'll save the world from global warming, it won't make one iota difference and if you really succeeded in lowering co2 significant, you would actually start extinguishing life they don't seem to understand any basic biology at all and yet these morons are running our parliament, running our lives and they are impoverishing everybody on this planet. I saw my energy bill even though we tried very hard, it's absolutely ludicrous and it's even worse knowing it is five times higher than if I was in the United States where at least they've got some pragmatism with regards is, we can't do everything in the solar and wind we're going to need our oil and gas and by the way it's beneath us, ours is beneath us but we've basically said we're not going to use it and so we're dependent on China who's polluting the world to death, it's unbelievable. I think many people have had their eyes open to many of these issues over the last couple of years of COVID tyranny. Professor Dalgleish, I'm honoured really to have you on, it's wonderful to hear your thoughts and your writings, it's good to delve into them, people can get the Conservative Woman, but thank you so much for the stand you've taken and thank you for sharing your thoughts with us today. Right. Well, thank you very much for having me. But just remember, we've written an enormous amount of this up in The Death of Science, which is available on Kindle, Amazon, and is multi-author. And it's got contributions from Karol Sikora, Sir Richard Dearlove, Clare Craig, Ros Jones. I mean, I'm really proud that we've been able to really put the gauntlet down, that this government and the world's governments and the scientists and the institutions and the medical profession have killed science. We have to do everything we can to rectify that. Thank you. And the viewers and listeners can get that. The links will be in the description. So however you're watching, however you're listening, you can just click on that. So, Professor, once again, thank you for your time today. Cheers. Thank you.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Launching Asimov Press, published by xander balwit on December 18, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. A biotechnology blog with a probabilistic and effective bent Artwork by Dalbert Today, Niko McCarty and I are launching Asimov Press, a digital magazine dedicated to biotechnology. It will publish lucid writing that leads people to explore the ways that biotechnology can effectively be used to do good. Please go here to read the full announcement and subscribe. Asimov Press is a new publishing venture modeled on Stripe Press, that will produce a newsletter, magazine, and books that feature writing about biological progress. Our primary focus will be on biotechnology, but we will also publish pieces on metascience and adjacent themes. Newsletters and magazines will be free to read. Our mission is to spread ideas that elucidate the promise of biology, take its concomitant risks seriously, and direct talent toward solving pressing problems. Our published work has three features that I want to highlight here: Pieces will steel-man alternative approaches, focus on high-impact but often underrated facets of biotechnology, and strive for mechanistic and probabilistic reasoning. Steelman: Biotechnology is not a panacea. Simple solutions are often the best solutions; no engineering required. When Ignaz Semmelweis suggested that doctors at an Austrian Hospital wash their hands between performing autopsies and delivering babies, the maternal mortality rate fell from around 25 percent to 1 percent. In another example, a public health campaign to iodize salt in Switzerland helped bring down the rate of deaf-mute births fivefold in just 8 years. Rather than demand answers from biotechnology, we can often make a positive difference in the world by investing in better public health, improving infrastructure and education, or scaling up existing inventions that have already proven effective. Even so, simplicity can feel unsatisfactory or even provocative. Semmelweis, considered arrogant by senior doctors, was ostracized and eventually dismissed from his post. An early pioneer in germ theory, he died in a Viennese insane asylum, after being severely beaten by guards. In Switzerland, although evidence for the efficacy of iodized salt was robust, some eminent scientists spoke out against the interventions - advocating for elaborate alternative treatments. We'll do our best to avoid publishing work that we wish were true, and instead aim to provide balanced, honest, and rigorous coverage of biotechnology. High-impact solutions: Progress often makes its greatest strides in areas that are not widely covered by the media. We will de-emphasize medical topics and focus instead on areas such as animal welfare and climate resiliency, where biotechnology has proven astonishingly effective yet remains underexplored. We want people to focus on what is most urgent and tractable, and not necessarily on what is most glamorous. Laundry is one example. Engineered enzymes that remove stains in cold water reduced the energy required to do laundry by about 90 percent. Laundry may not be as immediately headline-grabbing as new cancer therapies, but it provides a concrete and ingenious solution to a demonstrable need. Mechanisms: Biotechnology shouldn't be a mystery. Although its mechanisms are often infinitesimal, biology is material rather than magic. Cells are made from collections of atoms that we can manipulate, visualize, and control. Every engineering application has a mechanistic and tangible explanation. Often, these explanations are astonishingly beautiful. We encourage our writers to delve deeper and elucidate complex concepts in clear, illustrative prose. Asimov Press will publish one feature article every two weeks, with additional newsletters and shorter essays scattered in between. Articl...

Josh Dech has a deep understanding of the gut-brain connection. He is an ex-paramedic, and Holistic Nutritionist, specializing in gut health. It was the successes his clients have had with complex digestive diseases, previously thought to be impossible, that got him connected to some of the world's most renowned doctors. Since then, he's been recruited to the Priority Health Academy as a medical lecturer, helping educate doctors on the holistic approach to gut health, and complex digestive issues. Gut health is known to be connected to mental health, emotions, sleep, productivity, concentration, hormones, inflammation, sickness, detoxification, cravings, relationships, and more. Our lives can be severely impacted by an unhealthy gut. Listen & Subscribe on: iTunes / Stitcher / Podbean / Overcast / Spotify Contact Info Website: www.ReversablePod.com Podcast: ReversABLE: The Ultimate Gut Health Podcast Most Influential Person Kyle, a mentor of mine. Effect On Emotions Mindfulness has affected my emotions dramatically. So I have ADHD. It's something I've dealt with a long time, and actually fixing my gut 99 percent improved it to the point that you'd never know I have it. Unless … you live with me. And so when I was going through a lot of this process, trying to fix it, I was trying Vyvanse and other drugs. I was having mood swings, outbursts, and suicidal thoughts. Like I was a mess emotionally and psychologically. And after coming through that and healing up my gut, I was able to then look back and see what was going on and how miserable my wife was during this process. And, you know, God love her for sticking with me. And we went to counseling and did all this stuff. And a lot of it came back to how my body was creating chemicals in my brain, and so the mindfulness of my physical body allowed me a reflective mindfulness of my psychological body. Thoughts On Breathing So, breathing is interesting because we live in a world where we are deoxygenated. Gary Brekka is a fellow who's getting very famous right now through 10X Health, and he's famous for this quote; he says, the presence of oxygen is the absence of disease, and we do live in deoxygenated states. If I take your blood right now, Bruce, and I look at it under a microscope, your blood cells are probably aggregated, not coagulated, but aggregated electronically. They'd be drawn together like static cling. And so if we go out and just simply go 10 minutes in the earth, touch barefoot to the dirt in the earth, you discharge all these ions, those blood cells open up. Which means you have more surface area, which means you have more room for oxygenation. And by getting into the sunlight, getting infrared on your skin, getting a touch in the earth, we hyper oxygenate our bodies. You can add up to 16 times more oxygen to your mitochondrial cells. Imagine having 16 times more oxygen and, with it, more energy. And so breath works a very important part following guys like Wim Hof. What I'll do before an interview like this, I'll sit down for five to eight minutes, I'll do 30 breaths,  really dramatic in and out. And on the last breath, I exhale, a comfortable exhale, and I just hold it as long as I can. It's a minute, two minutes. You keep going, you go three minutes, four minutes, you'll be able to hold your breath and we hyper oxygenate the tissue. And that gives me better digestion, better breath, better energy, better mental clarity, all these things. My body starts to work better with that oxygen.   Bullying Story When I began my career, it was marked by significant changes. Dr. Semmelweis faced ostracism for his innovative ideas, a fate common to those introducing novelty; humans inherently resist change. Challenges, arguments, even hostility—these greeted my bold assertion: I'd discovered a breakthrough in reversing dreadful diseases. I posted on Facebook, proclaiming that nine out of ten cases of ulcerative colitis could be reversed, countering the prevalent notion in Western medicine of relying solely on drugs and hoping to avoid drastic surgeries. My stance led to a faculty position as a medical lecturer, discussing our successful reversal methods. But when I shared this on Reddit, backlash ensued. I was harassed, threatened, and my bookings hijacked. Many were defensive, unable to accept an alternative approach. It was tough; I almost gave up. Yet, the community I'd aided rallied, sharing stories of relief after years of suffering. Their support amidst the bullying rekindled my resolve to pursue change. Suggested Resources Book: The Oxygen Advantage by Patrick McCone Books: The Autoimmune Solution by Dr. Amy Myers App: Audible and Spotify Related Episodes The Gut-Brain Connection; Wade Lightheart Three Keys To Juggling Work and Family; Connie Benjamin Become A Realized Leader With Harvard Professor, Daniel P. Brown Are you experiencing anxiety & stress? I'm Bruce Langford, a practicing coach and hypnotist helping fast-track people just like you to shed their inner bully and move forward with confidence. Book a Free Coaching Session to get you on the road to a more satisfying life, feeling grounded and focused. Send me an email at bruce@mindfulnessmode.com with ‘Time Is Right' in the subject line. We'll schedule a call to discuss how you can move forward to a better life.

¿Qué se necesita para conversar y aceptar una idea nueva o distinta? Una obra de teatro estrenada en Londres presenta la vida de Ignaz Semmelweis, un obstetra húngaro que en el siglo XIX planteó el lavado de manos como una medida que podía salvar vidas. En este episodio, Andrés Kalawski y Paula Molina conversan sobre el aislamiento que sufrió Semmelweis por plantear esta idea, y la honestidad y empatía necesarias para plantear una discusión que busque el bienestar de todas las partes.

Did you know in the late 1800s, doctors didn't wash their hands between procedures? When Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis – an obstetrician in Vienna – realized women in his hospital were dying at staggering rates, he implemented staff-wide mandatory hand washing. Maternal death rates dropped by 90%. But doctors weren't happy. Semmelweis was called "crazy," told his idea was superstitious, not scientific.75 years later, Dr. Robert Goddard – an American professor of physics – published a report via the Smithsonian theorizing that, one day, a rocket could reach the moon. A New York Times editorial was published the very next morning slamming Dr. Goddard – writing that the professor lacked the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.Join us this week for an unusual one: Rejecting two pioneers in science – the fathers of hand washing and rocketry – Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis and Dr. Robert Goddard.Get to know Apostrophe:InstagramTwitterThreadsYouTube Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

As mentioned in the previous episode, we are continuing to provide some of the basic information that is imparted by the Higher Mind Training, which is a new personal growth program being prepared for release by the Better Angels Publishing Company. Its purpose is to help the normal, everyday person emerge from the prison of self-sabotage into the freedom of self-empowerment. The program probably won't be released until the middle of next year, but we want to give our podcast subscribers the information now, so you can begin using it right away, if you like.           To begin this episode, let's start out by taking a little detour in time and space back to August 13, 1865 to a sanitarium in Vienna, Austria, which is the date upon which one of its inmates named Ignatz Semmelweis died. He had suffered from a nervous breakdown and had been confined to the sanitarium a few months earlier. Outspoken, unruly, and constantly arguing that he was being held against his will, he suffered regular beatings from the guards. The cause of his death had been a gangrenous wound on his right hand, which was a probable result of one of these beatings.           Surprisingly, Semmelweis was a physician and scientist who had fallen into serious disrepute among the medical establishment of the capital city. He had been doing research on the mortality rates among women during childbirth and at one point, he had come up with a radical new idea that became extremely unpopular, primarily because there was absolutely no scientific basis for it. Even so, it seemed to make intuitive sense to him, so he began to institute it at Vienna General Hospital's First Obstetrical Clinic.           He documented the results of his unfounded and unaccepted new procedure and found that over several months, the maternal mortality rate in the obstetrical clinic dropped from 18% to 2%. Even though he still had no scientific theory upon which to base any medical hypothesis whatsoever, he still published a book about his findings in 1861, called “Etiology, Concept and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever.”           Given the story so far, the next obvious question would be – what was this radical new idea that Dr. Semmelweis had come up with that had seemingly cut the maternity mortality rate by nearly ninety percent? Now remember, he had no scientific explanation for how or why his procedure worked and every medical professional who had heard about it was adamantly opposed to it.           Get ready. You will probably find this quite shocking. He proposed that all the health care workers in the hospital, the doctors, nurses, and midwives, should wash their hands before they performed any procedure on any patient. In fact, he felt they should wash their hands before they even touched anyone at all and he came up with a chlorinated lime solution to do the job.           He had absolutely no scientific reasoning to support his supposition and his outrageous idea was met with ridicule and universally condemned by the entire medical establishment. They were certain of their opinion because, in their highly educated minds, the concept made absolutely no sense. Why would washing your hands have anything to do whatsoever with protecting the health of mothers and babies during childbirth?           And on top of that, the doctors felt personally offended. Why should they have to wash their hands? Afterall, doctors were considered to be refined gentlemen and gentlemen never have to wash their hands. That was for laborers and other members of the lower classes.           Following his clashes with the medical establishment, Semmelweis got involved with some other societal and political battles as well, and was ridiculed, ostracized, and finally ruined. He suffered a nervous breakdown and was committed to an asylum where he eventually died from the beatings he received from the guards.           All of this came from the audacity he had to suggest that medical professionals should wash their hands before treating patients. And don't forget, they weren't treating just anybody. This was the upper crust of Austrian society.  Many of the mothers and babies who died in the contaminated obstetrical hospitals were members of the aristocracy and royalty of Europe, who were being treated by the finest doctors of the day.           Many years after his death, because of his efforts to protect the maternity environment, he became widely known as the “Savior of Mothers.” Of course, he wasn't the first savior to be crucified by his detractors and certainly not the last.           To put the story into historical perspective, Dr. Semmelweis had made his radical handwashing suggestion about twenty years before the general emergence of germ theory into the scientific world, which followed the work of Pasteur and Lister.   Back in 1860, they knew nothing about germs whatsoever. They had never even heard the term. They still believed that disease was caused by liquid “humors” in the body, a two-thousand-year-old concept that was concocted by ancient Greek and Roman doctors. In the middle of the nineteenth century, the standard accepted medical procedure of the day for treating disease was still simple bloodletting. And they felt that the state of their medical understanding was incredibly advanced.           As primitive as they may appear today, this has been the case with most cultures. Every society thinks they are incredibly advanced, and this conceit goes way back. When chariots were invented in about 1600 BC, they were all the rage. The Hittites took them to an unheard-of level of comfort and maneuverability, and eventually refined them for warfare. The most advanced military battle of its time was fought in 1274 BC with over five thousand chariots helping to boost the carnage. I'm sure the warriors were all proud of the level of modernity they had achieved.           Going back to the “Savior of Mothers” 1860 example, let's back up a little to 1830's, 40's and 50's, and consider the tremendously advanced water system that was set up to bring water into the White House. It was complete with steam driven pumps and cast-iron piping and the fact that water was delivered in this way to the White House was a marvel of the times.           Of course, no one knew anything about germ theory and although the piping system was ingenious, the water that it carried was severely contaminated, coming from wells that abutted wastewater dumps that were loaded with pathogens. It is now believed that Presidents Henry Harrison, James Polk and Zachary Taylor all died as a result of exposure to the water brought in by that otherwise innovative system.           And that's not to mention the tragic death of Abraham Lincoln's beloved eleven-year-old son, Willie, who died from typhoid fever which was directly related to the putrid White House water.           So, due to their significant technological advances, they were able to distribute water in a more convenient way, but with their ignorance of germ theory, they just made it more convenient for people to get sick and die.           Of course, we've come a long way and hand sanitization has become almost universal, especially since the pandemic. But back then, they just didn't know what they didn't know. And guess what? Neither do we. No one ever does. I often find myself wondering what the people living a hundred and fifty years from now will think of us. Like all previous cultures, we believe we are incredibly advanced. But what critical factors don't we know now, that will be common knowledge throughout the world in 2175? With my lifelong focus on the evolution of human consciousness, my assumption as well as my hope is that it will have something to do with the way we use our minds. Because to put it simply, the way we use our minds is the basic root of all the major troubles that we face today. Look at it this way. We live in an extremely troubled world, nearly drowning in a sea of immense problems, and from what I've read, if you ask artificial intelligence to come up with a plan that would quickly and efficiently save the planet, it would simply respond, “Get rid of the human beings.” Of course, it's a shocking response, and some AI experts find it deeply disturbing, but you can see the troubling logic behind it. And if we are the primary cause of the problems that are plaguing our world, what's wrong with us?  Again, the answer is dramatically simple. It's our mind. That's right. the most advanced biological evolution since the beginning of life on earth, and indeed the very factor that enabled us to emerge from the brutal tests of survival of the fittest, this miraculous organ is the very cause of all our issues. And it isn't really the mind itself that is the problem. It's the way we use it. Let's refine that statement a little. It's the unconscious way that we've been unconsciously trained to unconsciously use it that's creating the problem. We have a mind with nearly unfathomable intelligence, but we haven't learned how to use it in a human-centric way. We develop incredible technology, but we don't use it in a way that serves humanity or the rest of the planet.   And this lack of evolved consciousness is nothing new. Just look at our track record. It's pretty dismal. And that's not just in caring for the planet, it's also deeply troubling in taking care of ourselves. Here is a particularly disgusting example.  About 160,000 people die each week from starvation on earth. That means that close to 8,500,000 people literally starve to death each year. They die because they simply don't get enough food to eat.           Now, get this – in the United States alone, 119 billion pounds of food is wasted each year. That means that 130 billion meals, $408 billion in food or about 40% of the total food supply is simply thrown out. Discarded. Four hundred and eight billion dollars of food is wasted each year, while 8,500,000 people die of starvation.           We have the money and we have the technology. We just have a serious problem with the way we misuse our intelligence. And personally, I believe that if and when people 150 years from now look back on us, it will be the generally primitive level of our human consciousness that will be so shocking to them. Because when it comes to the overall state of our consciousness, basically, we're still living a glorified law of the jungle. You know the drill – I, me, mine. Dog eat dog, Winner takes all, and the countless variations of the same primitive, fear-based theme, which leads to the sad conclusion that in the entire world, we have no greater enemy than ourselves. No other creature or factor poses a greater threat to our survival than we do. If the human species is ever destroyed, there is a high probability that it will be a case of unconscious suicide.           So, there can be no doubt that the growth of our inner consciousness is critical to our survival as a species, and I'd like to offer two of my favorite quotes on the subject. Albert Einstein said, “No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” And Dr. Carl Jung said, “The greatest and most important problems of life are all fundamentally insoluble. They can never be solved, but only outgrown.”           So again, we must grow. And when it comes to inner growth, I'd like to suggest a “what if.”  What if it's not all that hard? What if like the germs in the nineteenth century, there is something incredibly basic that we just don't know yet? And what if the key to our advancement is as simple as just washing your hands?           Well, this seems like a good place to stop. We'll go a couple of steps deeper in the coming episode, so keep your eyes, mind and heart open, and let's get together in the next one.

Ignaz Semmelweis was a Hungarian Physician who hypothesized about the importance of washing hands for hygiene. It was a very particular case study in Vienna that led him to his conclusion, but no one took him seriously. It wasn't until after his death that he was recognized as a medical revolutionary. In this episode, we talk about the story, including the case study that led Semmelweis to his beliefs, then we chat with Flexible Comedian Jonathan Burns!  Review this podcast at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-internet-says-it-s-true/id1530853589 Bonus episodes and content available at http://Patreon.com/MichaelKent For special discounts and links to our sponsors, visit http://theinternetsaysitstrue.com/deals

Welcome to another episode of Friday Philosophies, this week Michelle is joined by the show's new podcast producer, Katie Dalebout. In this episode, they delve into the intriguing concept known as the Semmelweis Effect. Named after Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis, who faced disbelief and ridicule for his groundbreaking discovery, about hand-washing, this effect explores our human tendency to reject new evidence that contradicts established beliefs, especially when it's uncomfortable or challenges our long help believe. We even get onto more historical anecdotes that relate to this effect, such as Abraham Lincoln's eerie encounter, as well as how the Semmelweis Effect has played out in various aspects of our lives. From medicine to global warming denial and even business strategies, we explore how this phenomenon impacts decision-making and personal growth. Key Takeaways: Embrace the discomfort of challenging your established beliefs; it can lead to personal growth and new opportunities. Recognize the power of being open to different perspectives and evidence that may contradict your current view. Avoid the extremes of unwavering belief or complete skepticism; strive for a balanced, flexible approach. Be curious and question the why behind your beliefs, especially when cognitive distortions like black-and-white thinking come into play. Be open to new information even when it flips how you were doing it before on its head and is more challenging or even annoying to begin with The Twelfth House episode referenced: The Wisdom of Via Negativa The Twelfth House + episode referenced: Mediumship: Scepticism, and the Unseen The Twelfth House episode referenced: Creating your Spiritual Operating System

Welcome to another episode of Friday Philosophies, this week Michelle is joined by the show's new podcast producer, Katie Dalebout. In this episode, they delve into the intriguing concept known as the Semmelweis Effect. Named after Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis, who faced disbelief and ridicule for his groundbreaking discovery, about handwashing, this effect explores our human tendency to reject new evidence that contradicts established beliefs, especially when it's uncomfortable or challenges our long help believe. We even get onto more historical anecdotes that relate to this effect, such as Abraham Lincoln's eerie encounter, as well as how the Semmelweis Effect has played out in various aspects of our lives. From medicine to global warming denial and even business strategies, we explore how this phenomenon impacts decision-making and personal growth. Key Takeaways: Embrace the discomfort of challenging your established beliefs; it can lead to personal growth and new opportunities. Recognize the power of being open to different perspectives and evidence that may contradict your current view. Avoid the extremes of unwavering belief or complete skepticism; strive for a balanced, flexible approach. Be curious and question the why behind your beliefs, especially when cognitive distortions like black-and-white thinking come into play. Be open to new information even when it flips how you were doing it before on its head and is more challenging or even annoying to begin with A few more days to join us for System Spells: Learn more here. until 29th Join us for Creators Cashing in it begins on: Episodes mentioned: The Twelfth House episode referenced: The Wisdom of Via Negativa The Twelfth House + episode referenced: Mediumship: Scepticism, and the Unseen The Twelfth House episode referenced: Creating your Spiritual Operating System

durée : 00:04:17 - Le Biais de Bernard Werber - par : Bernard Werber - Le docteur Semmelweis a tenté d'imposer un geste simple dans le monde de la médecine : se laver les mains. Il fut rejeté, moqué, oublié. La fièvre puerpérale continua de faire des ravages... Retour sur un visionnaire et bienfaiteur de l'humanité.

Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis was a Hungarian doctor, now known as an early pioneer of antiseptic procedures. Described as the "saviour of mothers", Semmelweis discovered that the incidence of puerperal, or childbed fever, could be drastically cut if doctors washed their hands before delivering babies in maternity wards. However, he was ridiculed and persecuted for his discovery and died an outcast. This program tells his amazing yet tragic story and shares a message of hope with us today. 

West End and Broadway stars Charlie Stemp and Tom Edden join us to chat about the critically acclaimed musical Crazy For You. Charlie says it's "the hardest thing" he's ever done due to the many elements involved, including performing extremely physical choreography and comedy in perfect timing. They also discuss the challenges of their hilarious Marx Brothers-inspired mirror scene, and reveal what it was like working with Tony award-winning theatre director Susan Stroman.We review the National Theatre's Bristol Old Vic Production of Dr Semmelweis at the Harold Pinter Theatre. It's written by Stephen Brown, directed by Tom Morris and starring Mark Rylance, who you'll know from the BBC's adaptation of Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall and Christopher Nolan's Second World War epic Dunkirk.Plus, we discuss Grenfell: in the words of survivors. A verbatim play, created from interviews with the residents at the heart of the Grenfell Tower fire, which killed 72 people. It's written by Gillian Slovo, stars Pearl Mackie and is on at the National Theatre.Also in this episode, we pay tribute to Tara Theatre AD and CEO Abdul Shayek, discuss Spirited Away coming to London Coliseum in 2024, and the Edinburgh Festival Fringe: what theatre and comedy to book... Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Three people were awarded the 2021 Nobel Prize in economics: Josh Angrist, Guido Imbens and David (“Dave”) Card. I have interviewed the first two, and today I have the pleasure of posting the last interview with Dr. Card himself. To most economists, Dr. Card needs no introduction and to be honest I'm really not even sure what to say. I will just say that one time I was having dinner with a well known labor economist who had been on the market the same year as Card, and this economist over dinner without any hint of exaggeration said simply that Card was the greatest labor economist of his generation, bar none. Other than that, I will just say some of the things about his work that has meant a lot to me. Card is “real economist”. Even more than that, he is “real labor economist”, which is the highest praise I know to give people. His knowledge of labor economic theory is deep and expansive. It rolls off his tongue effortlessly. You poke him, he bleeds income elasticities and a myriad of models that he holds to with a light grip. But he was one of the booster rockets on the “credibility revolution”, too, that launched the social sciences into a new level of empirical work. When he began working, labor was in the throes of a fairly deep empirical crisis, and we discussed that in this interview. I learned many things I didn't know, and he also corrected things I took for granted to be fact, like how I interpreted Bob Lalonde's job market paper and what it meant. Many of his studies seemed to be lightning rods on multiple levels — both because they were unexpected null results of prevailing neoclassical wisdom, but also because the studies forced the profession to have deeper conversations about epistemology. What is a model? What is evidence? What does it mean to believe something? When are beliefs justified? What makes them warranted? These were not topics that I think Dr. Card himself seemed particularly interested in, but it's very hard not to see in the anger that surrounded him and those studies people in the throes of being unable, unwilling or incapable of changing their mind even a small bit.This is in fact the story of the practical empirical work of data workers, though — marshaling convincing evidence, going up against a strong scientific blockade, and successful persuasion looking one way at the time that looks very different later. We saw a complete rejection of the facts with Semmelweis's hand washing hypothesis, and John Snow's germ theory, for instance. Both men published work that looking back is so obviously correct but at the time seemed to not move the needle on policymaker and scientist's opinion. I'm not saying that Dr. Card had that experience with his classic works on the minimum wage or immigration — he did after all win the John Bates Clark award and the Nobel Prize. But listening to his story about what he and his colleague and coauthor Alan Krueger experienced at the time when it was published, I can only say that I think sometimes we forget how intense these academic fights can be. We talk a little at different times about this speech he did in 2012 at Michigan about “design vs model based identification”, also, and if you want to read that, it's here.I hope you enjoy this interview as much as I enjoyed being a part of it. It's around 90 minutes long, but it felt like 30 minutes. At the 60 min mark, I told him well I guess we need to stop and he graciously gave me another half hour. He also makes an announcement in the interview that I think wasn't public knowledge, making me feel a little like Matt Drudge with breaking news. But no spoilers — you'll have to listen for yourself. Thank you again for tuning in. If you like these interviews, please share them! And if you really like them, consider supporting them with a subscription. But no worries if you don't want to. Have a great rest of your week! And remember — clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose. Scott's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Scott's Substack at causalinf.substack.com/subscribe

20230616 - 04 Semmelweis App - Hallgatói Reakciók by Bochkor

There's room in the world for all the different ideas. Unfortunately, many of my colleagues would disagree. I've been on Facebook a lot lately, and I've noticed that many doctors who don't share my opinion on alternative medicine jump straight to name-calling. Instead of respectful disagreement or sharing of ideas, culturally, we've gotten to a place where everything is so polarized that it's them and us, and there is no room for a middle ground. The sad part is that the patients will suffer the most as a result. Today I'm sharing a little bit of a history lesson and talking about how I deal with the rude and condescending doctors who refuse to have an open conversation about alternative ways of thinking. I'll also discuss different philosophical concepts and how medicine has evolved. Enjoy the episode!   Highlights How standards of care change and the four humors in ancient medicine Ignaz Semmelweis and his discovery of the origin of puerperal fever The terrible backlash that Semmelweis faced before ultimately being proven right Planck's principle and the unfortunate truth about the evolution of medicine Joseph Lister's struggle to get mainstream acceptance for his antiseptic practices The dismissal of alternative medicine by modern doctors and the over-weighting of evidence-based medicine Supporting patients' choices and empowering patients to walk a path that's right for them How the thoughts and accepted norms of the medical community change over the years Why we need to make room for different ideas and respectful disagreement in medicine The current state of medicine and why doctors need to fight to get medicine back   Resources Dr. Tassone's Practice https://www.drshawntassone.com/ The Hormone Balance Bible https://tassonemd.com/hormone-balance-bible/ Hormone Archetype Quiz https://tassonemd.lpages.co/hormonearchetypequiz/   Disclaimer This podcast and website represent the opinions of Dr. Shawn Tassone and his guests. The content here should not be taken as medical advice and is for informational purposes only. Because each person is so unique, please consult your health care professional for any medical questions.

See all the Healthcasts at https://www.biobalancehealth.com/healthcast-blog In the history of medicine over the last 2 centuries there have been many changes in the recommendations given to patients by their doctors.  In general, to change the way medicine is practiced improving the care of patients, a new treatment had to be opposed by one or two courageous doctors who were willing to put his/her livelihood and status in the society of medical doctors on the line.   Any medical practice that was contrary to the dogma that had been taught to doctors in training was looked down upon by medical peers and often the doctors who were trying to improve the life of their patients were ousted from their practices and lost their livelihood.  I have been one of those doctors trying to improve the practice of medicine in the face of criticism and “name calling” by other doctors who didn't want to change any of their practices.  In all cases it took a decade or more to regain my status and acceptance by other doctors and in some cases the changes I have made for the sake of my patients are still not accepted, and most likely won't be for another decade.  How and why medicine improves is a painful and complicated process that is always opposed at first.  How Progress of Medical Practice Has Been Thwarted by Doctors' Dogma Example #1 Handwashing between examining patients, When Did That Become a Medical Requirement? Doctors now embrace the practice of washing our hands between examining patients, and the practice of wearing one-use disposable gloves to do a vaginal exam on pregnant patients. However, before 1847 doctors didn't believe in hand washing between examining patients. There were no sterile procedures or wash basins available in doctors' suites, and vaginal exams were done on many patients in a maternity ward, one after the other without handwashing. Bacteria had not been discovered in that century and therefore washing away bacteria was unknown, then bacteria were discovered and the presence of dangerous “bugs” that one couldn't see was questioned by the older doctors and the, but Ignaz Semmelweis proved that ha dogma of the day. With the discovery of bacteria by young doctors and scientists presented a change to the practice of medicine that the older physicians in charge didn't accept. Then Dr. Semmelweis showed up on the scene, touting the new knowledge, and insisting that he must wash his hands between Obstetric patients in the ward.  This set off an explosion and pitted the old guard versus one young, new doctor.  His insistence in washing his hands caused the doctors to throw Dr Semmelweis off staff of his hospital and peer pressure caused him to be shunned by all of the physicians on staff. He had a hard time finding a medical practice and ended his life destitute and without anyone recognizing that he was right the whole time.  Medical handwashing became mandatory long after Hungarian physician Ignaz Semmelweis discovered its effectiveness (in 1846) in preventing disease in a hospital environment.  He was before his time, and if he had been listened to, thousands of laboring women would have survived childbirth, instead of dying from childbed fever!  In retrospect we can sympathize with him because we now know he was right, and his refusal to accept a dangerous practice and to help women live through childbirth, was a personally costly stand to make, but was the first step toward an advance in the practice of medicine.  Example #2 Is Estrogen Replacement for Menopause: Dangerous or Healthy? Reference--Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society Vol. 26, No. 12, pp. 1366-1374 DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001405 ß 2019 by The North American Menopause Society Estrogen for menopausal women has always been a hot potato for medicine. Many studies done in the 1950s and 1960s documented the benefit of giving women estrogen after menopause.  Medicine embraced this belief, and the majority of women were put on Premarin, the most popular estrogen replacement.  All went well until late in the 1960s and early in the 1970s doctors noticed that women with uteruses were getting uterine cancer at a very high number and the majority of women were taking Premarin.  Research confirmed that estrogen replacement without progesterone/progestin could cause uterine cancer!  This caused two things to happen:  Research began within the drug companies to see if giving Provera®, a synthetic progesterone, would protect women from uterine cancer; The second thing that happened was that women immediately stopped their Premarin therapy and were suffering all over the US.  “Premarin” and “Estrogen” became bad words in the doctor's offices, on the front page of papers.  This emotional response to a drug name was hard to erase when several years later, when I learned about Premarin replacement through medical school.  About that time Premarin + Provera, Prempro® was introduced to the public as the answer to getting uterine cancer in menopausal women.  That took over a decade to scientifically establish safety, and menopausal women were without their estrogen to relieve their symptoms. It took that much time to produce enough research to prove that estrogen replacement was not going to cause uterine cancer, but they were right. Estrogen of any type when combined with a progestin protects against uterine cancer, not every case of uterine cancer because there are other factors, but the majority of the time.  All was well in regard to E2 during the 1980s-2002 when the next shoe dropped.  In 2002 a flawed study was released from the NIH called the WHI or Women's Healthcare Initiative, which was published with a headline that startled doctors and women patients alike “Post-Menopausal Hormones Cause Breast Cancer and Heart Disease”.  This Press Release Title was a misinterpretation of the data in the NIH Research article that claimed that Estrogen plus Progestin caused heart attacks and strokes!  The truth has been excavated from the huge report describing the study, in the 20 years since the WHI article was published, but the original misinformation won't go away!  The study scared millions of women off hormone replacement and caused doctors to stop prescribing them.  The outcome of the WHI study is that one brand of estrogen, Premarin(estrogens) PLUS Provera a synthetic Progestin, together do cause heart attacks and strokes. However, estrogen (Premarin or estradiol) alone, does not cause either of these diseases and were proven to protect women from getting heart disease and breast cancer!   The original press release of the WHI study should have been titled, Provera, a Progestin, Increases the Risk of Heart Disease and Breast Cancer, and the FDA should have pulled Provera from the market.  If it had been properly titled and interpreted by the publisher, doctors would have just changed the Provera® prescription to a natural progesterone (bio-identical progesterone or Prometrium®, progesterone in oil) to take with estrogen, and women would not have had their quality of life changed for 2 decades without estrogen for their menopausal symptoms.  I am shocked that Provera® is still on the market with this kind of study showing the damage it can do! I believe the FDA is protecting the pharmaceutical company that makes this substance.  I, personally, have not prescribed Provera® since before the WHI when I tested blood levels of my patients and found very high levels of estrone.  As is typical, a fearful headline always stays in people's minds even when it is proven to be a lie, so for 20 years, most women have not been able to treat their menopausal symptoms.  Since 2002 a multitude of studies have been published (usually by women) stating the real benefits of estradiol replacement to prevent: Heart Disease, diabetes, obesity, dementia, arthritis, hot flashes, insomnia, longer life, and many more symptoms of aging.  You might guess, I never stopped giving estrogen to my post hysterectomy patients, and bioidentical progesterone plus estradiol to my patients with a uterus, to protect their uterus from cancer, yet to allow them to have the benefits of estradiol after menopause.  Because I read the whole WHI study, I realized that it was not estrogen, but progestin that caused the problem in the WHI study. However One very old doctor told one of my patients that I was going to “kill” her….he was just ignorant of the study. This seems to be how doctors react when they hear part of the information published about one of the medical treatments in question. Interestingly it is an emotional response that causes them to react negatively to new information instead of investigating it like scientists, which is what we are supposed to be! They have now been proven wrong and I look pretty good to the patients who remember.  You can see why it is both difficult to trust the information given us as doctors, and why even if we know the truth, it is difficult to treat patients in the negative environment that is caused by careless journalists.   This makes it difficult to make changes in medicine for fear someday, a researcher will find fault with it.  Example #3: Medical Advice about Drinking Water with Your Meals 100 years ago the JAMA Journal printed an editorial that said no one should drink water with their meal because it isn't healthy.  There was no scientific research to back up that medical advice and they didn't say what would happen to you if you did drink water with your meals, but they were adamant that it was dangerous.   In the following century doctors have discovered and presented scientific proof that drinking water with your food helps your food digest, makes you feel full now doctors recommend that everyone drinks water with their food!  This is proven with scientific research and finally replaced the previous dogma that restricted patients from the simple habit of drinking water with their meals.  It took a long time to reverse the beliefs of people, and I remember that in the 1970s my parents believed that no one should drink water with food.  The outcome of that habit was that they both had kidney damage as they grew older!  They maintained an environment of dehydration in their bodies which is physiologically dangerous to kidney function.    Conclusion:  So why should we listen to these medical “experts” when they are not advising us in a healthful lifestyle??  Well, about half the time they are right, and half the time they are wrong---it's a toss-up!    How does one tell the difference between bad and good advice from their doctor? You have to ask your doctor and trust her advice. As a doctor I read research that tests a given medical practice then I compare the outcomes of the research with the outcomes of my patients, and if their findings agree with my patients' experiences, then I embrace the research and include it in my medical advice. If not, I don't use that information and wait for a better study to parallel what I see every day.   You can do the same thing. If you think that the advice a doctor gives you is not consistent with your own experience, then you have to decide whether you take the medical advice and use it or not.

Semmelweis Reflex Hello, this is Hall T. Martin with the Startup Funding Espresso -- your daily shot of startup funding and investing. Semmelweis reflex is a cognitive bias defined by Wikipedia as the tendency to reject new evidence that contradicts a paradigm. Some investors reject startups if it goes against conventional wisdom. In the startup world, there are always new technologies, markets, and business models to support them.   It takes some effort to learn about these new areas and so can be easily dismissed as not important.  To overcome the Semmelweis reflex, investors should bring some level of curiosity to the process. The investor should set aside some time to learn about new markets and technologies.   Confronted with a new market or business model, the investor should learn more about it before making a decision. Startups presenting new ideas must make it real to the investor with concrete examples and facts. Startups must bring evidence of how a new business model can work to show validation.  The startup world is filled with new technologies and markets so it's important to remain open-minded in startup investing.   Thank you for joining us for the Startup Funding Espresso where we help startups and investors connect for funding. Let's go startup something today. _______________________________________________________ For more episodes from Investor Connect, please visit the site at:   Check out our other podcasts here:   For Investors check out:   For Startups check out:   For eGuides check out:   For upcoming Events, check out    For Feedback please contact info@tencapital.group    Please , share, and leave a review. Music courtesy of .

Recuperamos uno de los últimos Allende los Mares que recibimos desde Buenos Aires, desde donde Leandro Bello nos hablaba en su momento de Semmelweis. A mediados del siglo XIX, y ante el desconocimiento casi total de la vida microbiológica y sus implicaciones en nuestra salud, los decesos por infecciones eran el pan de cada día. Un obstetra húngaro dedicará su carrera a encontrar la solución a tanta muerte, en especial, entre las mujeres que daban a luz en el Hospital General de Viena. Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals