Podcasts about 2fjournal

Listen in as Real Science Radio host Fred Williams and co-host Doug McBurney review and update some of Bob Enyart's legendary list of not so old things! From Darwin's Finches to opals forming in months to man's genetic diversity in 200 generations, to carbon 14 everywhere it's not supposed to be (including in diamonds and dinosaur bones!), scientific observations simply defy the claim that the earth is billions of years old. Real science demands the dismissal of the alleged million and billion year ages asserted by the ungodly and the foolish.     * Finches Adapt in 17 Years, Not 2.3 Million: Charles Darwin's finches are claimed to have taken 2,300,000 years to diversify from an initial species blown onto the Galapagos Islands. Yet individuals from a single finch species on a U.S. Bird Reservation in the Pacific were introduced to a group of small islands 300 miles away and in at most 17 years, like Darwin's finches, they had diversified their beaks, related muscles, and behavior to fill various ecological niches. Hear about this also at rsr.org/spetner.  * Finches Speciate in Two Generations vs Two Million Years for Darwin's Birds?  Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands are said to have diversified into 14 species over a period of two million years. But in 2017 the journal Science reported a newcomer to the Island which within two generations spawned a reproductively isolated new species. In another instance as documented by Lee Spetner, a hundred birds of the same finch species introduced to an island cluster a 1,000 kilometers from Galapagos diversified into species with the typical variations in beak sizes, etc. "If this diversification occurred in less than seventeen years," Dr. Spetner asks, "why did Darwin's Galapagos finches [as claimed by evolutionists] have to take two million years?" * Opals Can Form in "A Few Months" And Don't Need 100,000 Years: A leading authority on opals, Allan W. Eckert, observed that, "scientific papers and textbooks have told that the process of opal formation requires tens of thousands of years, perhaps hundreds of thousands... Not true." A 2011 peer-reviewed paper in a geology journal from Australia, where almost all the world's opal is found, reported on the: "new timetable for opal formation involving weeks to a few months and not the hundreds of thousands of years envisaged by the conventional weathering model." (And apparently, per a 2019 report from Entomology Today, opals can even form around insects!) More knowledgeable scientists resist the uncritical, group-think insistence on false super-slow formation rates (as also for manganese nodules, gold veins, stone, petroleum, canyons and gullies, and even guts, all below). Regarding opals, Darwinian bias led geologists to long ignore possible quick action, as from microbes, as a possible explanation for these mineraloids. For both in nature and in the lab, opals form rapidly, not even in 10,000 years, but in weeks. See this also from creationists by a geologist, a paleobiochemist, and a nuclear chemist. * Blue Eyes Originated Not So Long Ago: Not a million years ago, nor a hundred thousand years ago, but based on a peer-reviewed paper in Human Genetics, a press release at Science Daily reports that, "research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. A team at the University of Copenhagen have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye color of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today." * Adding the Entire Universe to our List of Not So Old Things? Based on March 2019 findings from Hubble, Nobel laureate Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute and his co-authors in the Astrophysical Journal estimate that the universe is about a billion years younger than previously thought! Then in September 2019 in the journal Science, the age dropped precipitously to as low as 11.4 billion years! Of course, these measurements also further squeeze the canonical story of the big bang chronology with its many already existing problems including the insufficient time to "evolve" distant mature galaxies, galaxy clusters, superclusters, enormous black holes, filaments, bubbles, walls, and other superstructures. So, even though the latest estimates are still absurdly too old (Google: big bang predictions, and click on the #1 ranked article, or just go on over there to rsr.org/bb), regardless, we thought we'd plop the whole universe down on our List of Not So Old Things!   * After the Soft Tissue Discoveries, NOW Dino DNA: When a North Carolina State University paleontologist took the Tyrannosaurus Rex photos to the right of original biological material, that led to the 2016 discovery of dinosaur DNA, So far researchers have also recovered dinosaur blood vessels, collagen, osteocytes, hemoglobin, red blood cells, and various proteins. As of May 2018, twenty-six scientific journals, including Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, Bone, and Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, have confirmed the discovery of biomaterial fossils from many dinosaurs! Organisms including T. Rex, hadrosaur, titanosaur, triceratops, Lufengosaur, mosasaur, and Archaeopteryx, and many others dated, allegedly, even hundreds of millions of years old, have yielded their endogenous, still-soft biological material. See the web's most complete listing of 100+ journal papers (screenshot, left) announcing these discoveries at bflist.rsr.org and see it in layman's terms at rsr.org/soft. * Rapid Stalactites, Stalagmites, Etc.: A construction worker in 1954 left a lemonade bottle in one of Australia's famous Jenolan Caves. By 2011 it had been naturally transformed into a stalagmite (below, right). Increasing scientific knowledge is arguing for rapid cave formation (see below, Nat'l Park Service shrinks Carlsbad Caverns formation estimates from 260M years, to 10M, to 2M, to it "depends"). Likewise, examples are growing of rapid formations with typical chemical make-up (see bottle, left) of classic stalactites and stalagmites including: - in Nat'l Geo the Carlsbad Caverns stalagmite that rapidly covered a bat - the tunnel stalagmites at Tennessee's Raccoon Mountain - hundreds of stalactites beneath the Lincoln Memorial - those near Gladfelter Hall at Philadelphia's Temple University (send photos to Bob@rsr.org) - hundreds of stalactites at Australia's zinc mine at Mt. Isa.   - and those beneath Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance. * Most Human Mutations Arose in 200 Generations: From Adam until Real Science Radio, in only 200 generations! The journal Nature reports The Recent Origin of Most Human Protein-coding Variants. As summarized by geneticist co-author Joshua Akey, "Most of the mutations that we found arose in the last 200 generations or so" (the same number previously published by biblical creationists). Another 2012 paper, in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology (Eugenie Scott's own field) on High mitochondrial mutation rates, shows that one mitochondrial DNA mutation occurs every other generation, which, as creationists point out, indicates that mtEve would have lived about 200 generations ago. That's not so old! * National Geographic's Not-So-Old Hard-Rock Canyon at Mount St. Helens: As our List of Not So Old Things (this web page) reveals, by a kneejerk reaction evolutionary scientists assign ages of tens or hundreds of thousands of years (or at least just long enough to contradict Moses' chronology in Genesis.) However, with closer study, routinely, more and more old ages get revised downward to fit the world's growing scientific knowledge. So the trend is not that more information lengthens ages, but rather, as data replaces guesswork, ages tend to shrink until they are consistent with the young-earth biblical timeframe. Consistent with this observation, the May 2000 issue of National Geographic quotes the U.S. Forest Service's scientist at Mount St. Helens, Peter Frenzen, describing the canyon on the north side of the volcano. "You'd expect a hard-rock canyon to be thousands, even hundreds of thousands of years old. But this was cut in less than a decade." And as for the volcano itself, while again, the kneejerk reaction of old-earthers would be to claim that most geologic features are hundreds of thousands or millions of years old, the atheistic National Geographic magazine acknowledges from the evidence that Mount St. Helens, the volcanic mount, is only about 4,000 years old! See below and more at rsr.org/mount-st-helens. * Mount St. Helens Dome Ten Years Old not 1.7 Million: Geochron Laboratories of Cambridge, Mass., using potassium-argon and other radiometric techniques claims the rock sample they dated, from the volcano's dome, solidified somewhere between 340,000 and 2.8 million years ago. However photographic evidence and historical reports document the dome's formation during the 1980s, just ten years prior to the samples being collected. With the age of this rock known, radiometric dating therefore gets the age 99.99999% wrong. * Devils Hole Pupfish Isolated Not for 13,000 Years But for 100: Secular scientists default to knee-jerk, older-than-Bible-age dates. However, a tiny Mojave desert fish is having none of it. Rather than having been genetically isolated from other fish for 13,000 years (which would make this small school of fish older than the Earth itself), according to a paper in the journal Nature, actual measurements of mutation rates indicate that the genetic diversity of these Pupfish could have been generated in about 100 years, give or take a few. * Polystrates like Spines and Rare Schools of Fossilized Jellyfish: Previously, seven sedimentary layers in Wisconsin had been described as taking a million years to form. And because jellyfish have no skeleton, as Charles Darwin pointed out, it is rare to find them among fossils. But now, reported in the journal Geology, a school of jellyfish fossils have been found throughout those same seven layers. So, polystrate fossils that condense the time of strata deposition from eons to hours or months, include: - Jellyfish in central Wisconsin were not deposited and fossilized over a million years but during a single event quick enough to trap a whole school. (This fossil school, therefore, taken as a unit forms a polystrate fossil.) Examples are everywhere that falsify the claims of strata deposition over millions of years. - Countless trilobites buried in astounding three dimensionality around the world are meticulously recovered from limestone, much of which is claimed to have been deposited very slowly. Contrariwise, because these specimens were buried rapidly in quickly laid down sediments, they show no evidence of greater erosion on their upper parts as compared to their lower parts. - The delicacy of radiating spine polystrates, like tadpole and jellyfish fossils, especially clearly demonstrate the rapidity of such strata deposition. - A second school of jellyfish, even though they rarely fossilized, exists in another locale with jellyfish fossils in multiple layers, in Australia's Brockman Iron Formation, constraining there too the rate of strata deposition. By the way, jellyfish are an example of evolution's big squeeze. Like galaxies evolving too quickly, 

Listen in as Real Science Radio host Fred Williams and co-host Doug McBurney review and update some of Bob Enyart's legendary list of not so old things! From Darwin's Finches to opals forming in months to man's genetic diversity in 200 generations, to carbon 14 everywhere it's not supposed to be (including in diamonds and dinosaur bones!), scientific observations simply defy the claim that the earth is billions of years old. Real science demands the dismissal of the alleged million and billion year ages asserted by the ungodly and the foolish.   * Finches Adapt in 17 Years, Not 2.3 Million: Charles Darwin's finches are claimed to have taken 2,300,000 years to diversify from an initial species blown onto the Galapagos Islands. Yet individuals from a single finch species on a U.S. Bird Reservation in the Pacific were introduced to a group of small islands 300 miles away and in at most 17 years, like Darwin's finches, they had diversified their beaks, related muscles, and behavior to fill various ecological niches. Hear about this also at rsr.org/spetner.  * Finches Speciate in Two Generations vs Two Million Years for Darwin's Birds?  Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands are said to have diversified into 14 species over a period of two million years. But in 2017 the journal Science reported a newcomer to the Island which within two generations spawned a reproductively isolated new species. In another instance as documented by Lee Spetner, a hundred birds of the same finch species introduced to an island cluster a 1,000 kilometers from Galapagos diversified into species with the typical variations in beak sizes, etc. "If this diversification occurred in less than seventeen years," Dr. Spetner asks, "why did Darwin's Galapagos finches [as claimed by evolutionists] have to take two million years?" * Opals Can Form in "A Few Months" And Don't Need 100,000 Years: A leading authority on opals, Allan W. Eckert, observed that, "scientific papers and textbooks have told that the process of opal formation requires tens of thousands of years, perhaps hundreds of thousands... Not true." A 2011 peer-reviewed paper in a geology journal from Australia, where almost all the world's opal is found, reported on the: "new timetable for opal formation involving weeks to a few months and not the hundreds of thousands of years envisaged by the conventional weathering model." (And apparently, per a 2019 report from Entomology Today, opals can even form around insects!) More knowledgeable scientists resist the uncritical, group-think insistence on false super-slow formation rates (as also for manganese nodules, gold veins, stone, petroleum, canyons and gullies, and even guts, all below). Regarding opals, Darwinian bias led geologists to long ignore possible quick action, as from microbes, as a possible explanation for these mineraloids. For both in nature and in the lab, opals form rapidly, not even in 10,000 years, but in weeks. See this also from creationists by a geologist, a paleobiochemist, and a nuclear chemist. * Blue Eyes Originated Not So Long Ago: Not a million years ago, nor a hundred thousand years ago, but based on a peer-reviewed paper in Human Genetics, a press release at Science Daily reports that, "research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. A team at the University of Copenhagen have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye color of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today." * Adding the Entire Universe to our List of Not So Old Things? Based on March 2019 findings from Hubble, Nobel laureate Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute and his co-authors in the Astrophysical Journal estimate that the universe is about a billion years younger than previously thought! Then in September 2019 in the journal Science, the age dropped precipitously to as low as 11.4 billion years! Of course, these measurements also further squeeze the canonical story of the big bang chronology with its many already existing problems including the insufficient time to "evolve" distant mature galaxies, galaxy clusters, superclusters, enormous black holes, filaments, bubbles, walls, and other superstructures. So, even though the latest estimates are still absurdly too old (Google: big bang predictions, and click on the #1 ranked article, or just go on over there to rsr.org/bb), regardless, we thought we'd plop the whole universe down on our List of Not So Old Things!   * After the Soft Tissue Discoveries, NOW Dino DNA: When a North Carolina State University paleontologist took the Tyrannosaurus Rex photos to the right of original biological material, that led to the 2016 discovery of dinosaur DNA, So far researchers have also recovered dinosaur blood vessels, collagen, osteocytes, hemoglobin, red blood cells, and various proteins. As of May 2018, twenty-six scientific journals, including Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, Bone, and Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, have confirmed the discovery of biomaterial fossils from many dinosaurs! Organisms including T. Rex, hadrosaur, titanosaur, triceratops, Lufengosaur, mosasaur, and Archaeopteryx, and many others dated, allegedly, even hundreds of millions of years old, have yielded their endogenous, still-soft biological material. See the web's most complete listing of 100+ journal papers (screenshot, left) announcing these discoveries at bflist.rsr.org and see it in layman's terms at rsr.org/soft. * Rapid Stalactites, Stalagmites, Etc.: A construction worker in 1954 left a lemonade bottle in one of Australia's famous Jenolan Caves. By 2011 it had been naturally transformed into a stalagmite (below, right). Increasing scientific knowledge is arguing for rapid cave formation (see below, Nat'l Park Service shrinks Carlsbad Caverns formation estimates from 260M years, to 10M, to 2M, to it "depends"). Likewise, examples are growing of rapid formations with typical chemical make-up (see bottle, left) of classic stalactites and stalagmites including: - in Nat'l Geo the Carlsbad Caverns stalagmite that rapidly covered a bat - the tunnel stalagmites at Tennessee's Raccoon Mountain - hundreds of stalactites beneath the Lincoln Memorial - those near Gladfelter Hall at Philadelphia's Temple University (send photos to Bob@rsr.org) - hundreds of stalactites at Australia's zinc mine at Mt. Isa.   - and those beneath Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance. * Most Human Mutations Arose in 200 Generations: From Adam until Real Science Radio, in only 200 generations! The journal Nature reports The Recent Origin of Most Human Protein-coding Variants. As summarized by geneticist co-author Joshua Akey, "Most of the mutations that we found arose in the last 200 generations or so" (the same number previously published by biblical creationists). Another 2012 paper, in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology (Eugenie Scott's own field) on High mitochondrial mutation rates, shows that one mitochondrial DNA mutation occurs every other generation, which, as creationists point out, indicates that mtEve would have lived about 200 generations ago. That's not so old! * National Geographic's Not-So-Old Hard-Rock Canyon at Mount St. Helens: As our List of Not So Old Things (this web page) reveals, by a kneejerk reaction evolutionary scientists assign ages of tens or hundreds of thousands of years (or at least just long enough to contradict Moses' chronology in Genesis.) However, with closer study, routinely, more and more old ages get revised downward to fit the world's growing scientific knowledge. So the trend is not that more information lengthens ages, but rather, as data replaces guesswork, ages tend to shrink until they are consistent with the young-earth biblical timeframe. Consistent with this observation, the May 2000 issue of National Geographic quotes the U.S. Forest Service's scientist at Mount St. Helens, Peter Frenzen, describing the canyon on the north side of the volcano. "You'd expect a hard-rock canyon to be thousands, even hundreds of thousands of years old. But this was cut in less than a decade." And as for the volcano itself, while again, the kneejerk reaction of old-earthers would be to claim that most geologic features are hundreds of thousands or millions of years old, the atheistic National Geographic magazine acknowledges from the evidence that Mount St. Helens, the volcanic mount, is only about 4,000 years old! See below and more at rsr.org/mount-st-helens. * Mount St. Helens Dome Ten Years Old not 1.7 Million: Geochron Laboratories of Cambridge, Mass., using potassium-argon and other radiometric techniques claims the rock sample they dated, from the volcano's dome, solidified somewhere between 340,000 and 2.8 million years ago. However photographic evidence and historical reports document the dome's formation during the 1980s, just ten years prior to the samples being collected. With the age of this rock known, radiometric dating therefore gets the age 99.99999% wrong. * Devils Hole Pupfish Isolated Not for 13,000 Years But for 100: Secular scientists default to knee-jerk, older-than-Bible-age dates. However, a tiny Mojave desert fish is having none of it. Rather than having been genetically isolated from other fish for 13,000 years (which would make this small school of fish older than the Earth itself), according to a paper in the journal Nature, actual measurements of mutation rates indicate that the genetic diversity of these Pupfish could have been generated in about 100 years, give or take a few. * Polystrates like Spines and Rare Schools of Fossilized Jellyfish: Previously, seven sedimentary layers in Wisconsin had been described as taking a million years to form. And because jellyfish have no skeleton, as Charles Darwin pointed out, it is rare to find them among fossils. But now, reported in the journal Geology, a school of jellyfish fossils have been found throughout those same seven layers. So, polystrate fossils that condense the time of strata deposition from eons to hours or months, include: - Jellyfish in central Wisconsin were not deposited and fossilized over a million years but during a single event quick enough to trap a whole school. (This fossil school, therefore, taken as a unit forms a polystrate fossil.) Examples are everywhere that falsify the claims of strata deposition over millions of years. - Countless trilobites buried in astounding three dimensionality around the world are meticulously recovered from limestone, much of which is claimed to have been deposited very slowly. Contrariwise, because these specimens were buried rapidly in quickly laid down sediments, they show no evidence of greater erosion on their upper parts as compared to their lower parts. - The delicacy of radiating spine polystrates, like tadpole and jellyfish fossils, especially clearly demonstrate the rapidity of such strata deposition. - A second school of jellyfish, even though they rarely fossilized, exists in another locale with jellyfish fossils in multiple layers, in Australia's Brockman Iron Formation, constraining there too the rate of strata deposition. By the way, jellyfish are an example of evolution's big squeeze. Like galaxies e

Wörter zusammensetzen und komplexe Sätze bilden und verstehen, das können nur wir Menschen. Aber was passiert in unserem Gehirn, wenn wir eine Sprache lernen, warum fällt es Kindern leichter und gibt es Unterschiede zwischen ein- und mehrsprachigen Menschen? Diese und mehr Fragen beantwortet in dieser Folge Cheslie Klein. Sie arbeitet am Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften. Wer noch mehr zum Thema Gehirn und Sprache wissen möchte, findet hier weitere Informationen: - Friederici, A. D., Mueller, J. L., & Oberecker, R. (2011). Precursors to natural grammar learning: preliminary evidence from 4-month-old infants. PLoS One, 6(3), e17920. https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0017920&data=05%7C02%7Cantonia.beckermann%40welt.de%7Ca2aea5803d124a18355508dd524476c0%7Ca1e7a36c6a4847689d653f679c0f3b12%7C0%7C0%7C638757176226905286%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1XsPF4pMPpmLEUY0dnnR7977NEh4reQ2qnmgQNpVst0%3D&reserved=0 (eine Studie zum passiven Lernen bei Babys) - Perani, D., Saccuman, M. C., Scifo, P., Anwander, A., Spada, D., Baldoli, C., ... & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Neural language networks at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(38), 16056-16061. https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1073%2Fpnas.1102991108&data=05%7C02%7Cantonia.beckermann%40welt.de%7Ca2aea5803d124a18355508dd524476c0%7Ca1e7a36c6a4847689d653f679c0f3b12%7C0%7C0%7C638757176226924956%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8vXJWMQDMc3T4cCNu4lH5mITeeD0HFHtwIbBuuCuI7Y%3D&reserved=0 (Das Sprachnetzwerk im Gehirn bei Geburt) Produktion: Christian Schlaak Redaktion: Antonia Beckermann Ab sofort gibt es noch mehr "Aha!" bei WELTplus und Apple Podcasts. Hier bei WELT hören: https://www.welt.de/podcasts/aha-zehn-minuten-alltags-wissen/plus246844328/Noch-mehr-Alltagswissen-Aha-Bonus-Folgen-fuer-Abonnenten-Podcast.html. "Aha! Zehn Minuten Alltags-Wissen" ist der Wissenschafts-Podcast von WELT. Wir freuen uns über Feedback an wissen@welt.de. Impressum: https://www.welt.de/services/article7893735/Impressum.html Datenschutz: https://www.welt.de/services/article157550705/Datenschutzerklaerung-WELT-DIGITAL.html

Lots of people think that video games are a waste of time. Well, that may depend on how they're used and what games are being played. In this episode, we examine many of the health benefits that can be derived from a healthy video game diet. Playing games can lead to the acquisition of a surprisingly large number of skills. Skills that your parents probably weren't aware of, or that they didn't realize where you learned them. Bottom line is: games are dope. You should play them. Let us know what talents and skills you've gained through playing certain games in the comments! Thanks for watching and being part of the conversation. **We're Now On Spotify**: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gIzzvT3AfRHjGlfF8kFW3 **Listen On Soundcloud**: https://soundcloud.com/resonantarc **Listen On iTunes**: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/state-of-the-arc-podcast/id1121795837 **Listen On Pocket Cast**: http://pca.st/NJsJ Patreon Page: https://www.patreon.com/resonantarc Subscribe Star: https://www.subscribestar.com/resonant-arc Twitter: https://twitter.com/resonantarc Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/resonantarc Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/resonantarc TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@resonantarc Research links: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1304728.pdf https://scientificorigin.com/15-surprising-benefits-of-playing-video-games https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-a0034857.pdf https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0120011 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0187779 https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/24/health/kids-video-games-cognition-memory/index.html https://www.videogameseurope.eu/perspective/girls-who-play-video-games-are-three-times-more-likely-to-pursue-stem-careers-than-girls-who-dont/ https://education.minecraft.net/en-us/blog/teaching-sel-and-cs-with-intention https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twE-zdUkB_U&list=WL&index=1 https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/usable-knowledge/21/06/find-fun https://today.tamu.edu/2021/09/06/5-reasons-video-games-should-be-more-widely-used-in-school/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178907000055 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563212000623 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2012/12/17/ten-country-comparison-suggests-theres-little-or-no-link-between-video-games-and-gun-murders/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/04/19/as-video-game-sales-climb-year-over-year-violent-crime-continues-to-fall/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaICKlp9kQc https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddisalvo/2014/04/06/the-surprising-connection-between-playing-video-games-and-a-thicker-brain/#:~:text=What%20they%20found%20is%20that,brain's%20command%20and%20control%20center https://news.byu.edu/news/video-games-are-good-girls-if-parents-play-along#:~:text=Researchers%20from%20Brigham%20Young%20University's,family%20connection%2C%20mental%20health

Did you know scientists found the oldest human footprint ever? It's a single step frozen in time, left by an ancient human over 1.2 million years ago in Spain! This footprint gives us a rare glimpse into how our distant ancestors lived and moved around. What's cool is that it was preserved in mud that hardened over time, almost like nature's time capsule. Researchers believe it was made by a young individual, possibly part of a family group exploring the area. It's amazing to think a simple footprint can teach us so much about our ancient past! Credit: Chalcolithic leather shoe: By Pinhasi R, Gasparian B, Areshian G, Zardaryan D, Smith A, Guy Bar-Oz, Thomas Higham - https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pon..., CC BY 2.5 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/..., https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index... Animation is created by Bright Side. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Music from TheSoul Sound: https://thesoul-sound.com/ Check our Bright Side podcast on Spotify and leave a positive review! https://open.spotify.com/show/0hUkPxD... Subscribe to Bright Side: https://goo.gl/rQTJZz ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Our Social Media: Facebook:   / brightside   Instagram:   / brightside.official   TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@brightside.of... Stock materials (photos, footages and other): https://www.depositphotos.com https://www.shutterstock.com https://www.eastnews.ru ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For more videos and articles visit: http://www.brightside.me Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

For years, mattresses and pillows carried a warning tag that said “Warning: Do Not Remove This Tag Under Penalty of Law”. Although they have softened the language a bit, there is still a warning. So why does anyone care if you remove the tag on your own pillow? This episode begins with an explanation. https://www.livescience.com/33039-why-do-mattresses-have-do-not-remove-tags.html As important and natural as sleep is, it is a problem for almost everyone to either fall asleep or stay asleep at least some of the time. Fortunately, sleep is something that has been studied a lot. Joining me to share the latest research on how to improve your sleep is Aric Prather, a world renowned sleep scientist and author of the book The Sleep Prescription: Seven Days to Unlocking Your Best Rest (https://amzn.to/3OKZWC7). You may think you have heard all the sleep advice there is, but I assure you, you haven't heard all of what Aric has to say. Listen and you could find yourself sleeping much better tonight.  What makes someone assertive? Generally, those are the people who seem to know what they want and are able to communicate it clearly. Most of us have been in situations where we wish we were more assertive and said what was really on our mind, but we just weren't able to do it. Here with some advice for everyone who would like to be more assertive is Randy Paterson author of The Assertiveness Handbook: How to Express Your Ideas and Stand Up for Yourself at Work and in Relationships (https://amzn.to/3GNDJ4C).  Seldom does an employee complain that they get too much praise and recognition from their boss. The complaint is usually just the opposite. Yet if an employer is smart, he or she might want to be freer with praise and accolades for their workers when it deserved. Listen as I explain the benefits compliments and positive feedback for both employees and employers. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0048174 PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!!! INDEED:  Get a $75 SPONSORED JOB CREDIT to get your jobs more visibility at https://Indeed.com/SOMETHING  Support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast.  Terms & conditions apply. AURA: Save on the perfect gift by visiting https://AuraFrames.com to get $35-off Aura's best-selling Carver Mat frames by using promo code SOMETHING at checkout! SHOPIFY:  Sign up for a $1 per-month trial period at https://Shopify.com/sysk . Go to SHOPIFY.com/sysk to grow your business – no matter what stage you're in! MINT MOBILE: Cut your wireless bill to $15 a month at https://MintMobile.com/something! $45 upfront payment required (equivalent to $15/mo.).  New customers on first 3 month plan only. Additional taxes, fees, & restrictions apply. HERS: Hers is changing women's healthcare by providing access to GLP-1 weekly injections with the same active ingredient as Ozempic and Wegovy, as well as oral medication kits. Start your free online visit today at https://forhers.com/sysk DELL: It's your last chance to snag Dell Technologies' lowest prices of the year before the holidays! If you've been waiting for an AI-ready PC, this is their biggest sale of the year! Shop now at https://Dell.com/deals PROGRESSIVE: The Name Your Price tool from Progressive can help you save on car insurance! You just tell Progressive what you want to pay and get options within your budget. Try it today at https://Progressive.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

How do you avoid letting the present overshadow the past and future in your business? In this episode, we dive into the concept of recency bias and its impact on decision-making. We discuss how relying solely on recent experiences can lead to emotional exhaustion, poor decisions, and skewed priorities. By balancing intuition with data, setting clear boundaries, and reviewing long-term trends, you can make more informed choices for your business. Overcoming recency bias is essential for building a thoughtful, sustainable, and successful business. Main topics: Impact of Recency Bias Balancing Gut and Data Emotional Exhaustion and Decision-Making Consistency in Client Feedback Long-Term vs. Short-Term Goals Main takeaway: Recency bias keeps us focused on the present, but it can cloud our ability to make informed, long-term decisions. Recency bias keeps us focused on the present, making it easy to give more weight to what's happening right now than the bigger picture. While staying in the moment is important, it can cloud our ability to make informed, long-term decisions for our business. Have you ever made a choice based on a recent bad experience, only to realize later that it didn't align with your goals? The key is to balance gut instincts with historical data and trends. Take a step back, review your year as a whole, and ensure your decisions are grounded in both context and strategy. Links: https://scholar.harvard.edu/sites/scholar.harvard.edu/files/fudenberg/files/learning_with_recency_bias.pdf https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1009517 Check out our Starter Packs See all of our discounts! Check out ProTrainings Code: CPR-petsitterconfessional for 10% off Give us a call! (636) 364-8260  Follow us on: Instagram, Facebook, Twitter Email us at: petsitterconfessional@gmail.com Full show notes and transcript   Sponsored by: ❤️ Our AMAZING Patreon Supporters  Pet Sitters Associates Visit: https://www.petsitllc.com Code: Confessional

Warum glauben wir Menschen? Und warum sind wir sogar bereit, an Dinge zu glauben, die andere eher unwahrscheinlich oder sogar absurd finden? Ob wir glauben, mit den Sternen in Verbindung zu stehen, besonders "wach" das politische Geschehen zu beurteilen oder Echsenmenschen für wahrscheinlich halten: Unser Glaube an Geschichten, Muster und geheime Wahrheiten sagt eine Menge über uns aus. Ab wann werden diese Überzeugungen zur Gefahr – für den Einzelnen und die Gesellschaft? Gemeinsam mit Dr. Pia Lamberty, Sozialpsychologin und Expertin für Verschwörungserzählungen, hinterfragt Franca Cerutti die Mechanismen hinter den Mythen. Was ist eine Verschwörungsmentalität? Was macht Menschen anfällig? Wann wird Glaube zum Problem? Und wie kommen wir aus dem Verschwörungsstrudel wieder heraus? Bücher von Pia Lamberty und Katharina Nocun: „Fake Facts: Wie Verschwörungstheorien unser Denken bestimmen“ (https://amzn.eu/d/7bfXuxf) „True Facts: Was gegen Verschwörungserzählungen wirklich hilft“ (https://amzn.eu/d/iBzJyTD) „Gefährlicher Glaube: Die radikale Gedankenwelt der Esoterik“ (https://amzn.eu/d/1sUhoEr) Die Berechnung zur Geheimhaltung von Verschwörungen findest du hier: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0147905&utm_source=chatgpt.com Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte: https://linktr.ee/psychologietogo Du möchtest Werbung in diesem Podcast schalten? Dann erfahre hier mehr über die Werbemöglichkeiten bei Seven.One Audio: https://www.seven.one/portfolio/sevenone-audio

In today's episode of the "Fasting for Life" podcast, we discuss various topics in each episode, offering immediate, actionable steps and cover areas such as fat loss, health optimization, and the science of lifestyle design. The podcast emphasizes the wide-ranging benefits of fasting beyond weight loss, highlighting improvements in metabolic flexibility, reduced inflammation, and disease prevention, among others. Engaging with their audience, we are open to questions and provide additional resources through challenges and their fast start guide. FREE RESOURCE - DOWNLOAD THE NEW  BLUEPRINT TO FASTING FOR FAT LOSS! Learn how to RAMP UP into longer fasting windows! Gain insights into the non-weight loss benefits of fasting! Personalize your own fasting schedule and consistent FAT LOSS results! Get answers to what breaks a fast, how to break a fast, and tips and tricks to accelerate your fasting wins! THE BLUEPRINT TO FASTING FOR FAT LOSS DOWNLOAD Link to Berberine mentioned in this episode: https://us.fullscript.com/plans/ffl-berberine DOWNLOAD THE FASTING TRANSFORMATION JOURNAL HERE! Get your FREE BOX OF LMNT hydration support for the perfect electrolyte balance for your fasting lifestyle with your first purchase here! Get 30% off a Keto-Mojo blood glucose and ketone monitor (discount shown at checkout)! Click here! Let's continue the conversation. Click the link below to JOIN the Fasting For Life Community, a group of like-minded, new, and experienced fasters! The first two rules of fasting need not apply! Fasting For Life Community - Join HERE New to the podcast and wondering where to start? Head to the website and download our  Fast Start Guide, 6 simple steps to put One Meal a Day Fasting (OMAD) into practice! Get our NEW sleep guide here! SLEEP GUIDE DIRECT DOWNLOAD If you enjoy the podcast, would you please tap on the stars below and consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it helps bring you the best original content each week. We also enjoy reading them! Research Links: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0209353

Mówimy o eksplozji rosyjskiego satelity, która zagroziła załodze Międzynarodowej Stacji Kosmicznej oraz o rekordowym huraganie Beryl, zadziwił i przestraszył klimatologów.Cykl “Nauka na czasie” to lżejszy format naszego podcastu, w którym omawiamy dwa wybrane naukowe newsy. Cykl ten publikujemy co drugi tydzień, na przemian z dłuższymi odcinkami. Rozważcie wsparcie nas na Patronite - dzięki Waszym wpłatom będziemy mogli utrzymać cotygodniowy rytm ukazywania się nowych odcinków: https://patronite.pl/crazynaukaJeśli wolisz jednorazowo postawić nam kawę, to super. Dzięki!

Episode Description In this episode, we covered: Common period and cycle changes in perimenopause  Uterine fibroids, polyps, endometriosis and adenomyosis Is it estrogen dominance or progesterone deficiency? Can you “regulate” your periods in perimenopause? What's behind painful & heavy periods? How your gut is tied to your periods 7 ways to improve perimenopause periods Supplements I recommend for heavy/painful periods   AS MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE:  MACA: Grab the Maca I recommend HERE  FISH OIL: Grab the Fish Oil  I recommend HERE (code: claudia123). WORK WITH US: The Hormone Rescue Program   SOURCES:  https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/menstruation/conditioninfo/irregularities https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9717552 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6901331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7924872/ https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0049744&fbclid=IwAR2IXQnDSVyqtfCBV-bD4XDtI6e44kG5q47DBWCzufLGQoejr4WYW0EcrUY https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16117603/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0965229918307969?via%3Dihub   To Connect with Claudia Petrilli:  Instagram LinkedIn Facebook Website FREE GIFT: Peri-What?! The Must-Have Guide for Navigating Hormone Changes in Your 40s WORK WITH US: The Hormone Rescue Program QUESTIONS? EMAIL: claudia@claudiapetrilli.com LOVE THE SHOW?!  Please subscribe, leave a 5-star rating, review, and share, so that other women can find this podcast for guidance and support through their perimenopause journey! 

Ihr Lieben, mit dieser Folge möchten wir euch und auch uns selbst ein paar stärkende Worte mitgeben! Wir möchten aber auch betonen, dass positive Affirmationen keine Therapie ersetzen können.Solltet ihr also Symptome einer Depression oder depressiven Verstimmung zeigen, wendet euch an: https://www.deutsche-depressionshilfe.de/startPositive Affirmationen in der Episode(00:04:41-00:07:40) Was können positive Affirmationen bewirken?(00:09:37-00:11:13) Gesundheit(00:11:14-00:13:02) Beziehung(00:13:03-00:14:49) Familie und Freundschaft(00:14:49-00:16:38) Finanzen(00:16:38-00:18:22) Karriere und Beruf(00:18:22-00:20:15) Wohnen und Umfeld(00:20:15-00:22:03) Freizeit und Erholung(00:22:05-00:24:06) Persönliche EntwicklungText zum Mitsprechen:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r_D-YoZPLJn-pmyHMfckE6kYoe8uDQXgDA6I272TsZA/edit?usp=sharingAuswahl Quellen: "Self-affirmation alters the brain's response to health messages and subsequent behavior change" von 2015"Self-Affirmation Improves Problem-Solving under Stress" 2013https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283545154_Self-Affirmation_Activates_Brain_Systems_Associated_with_Self-Related_Processing_and_Reward_and_is_Reinforced_by_Future_Orientation von 20152019: Association of Optimism With Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777240/2014 Self-Affirmation Promotes Physical Activity https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261256631_Self-Affirmation_Promotes_Physical_ActivityProf. Dr. René Paasch: Unsichtbare Fesseln – Wie Neuroplastizität unsere Denkmuster verändert, 2023 https://www.die-sportpsychologen.de/2023/10/prof-dr-rene-paasch-unsichtbare-fesseln-wie-neuroplastizitaet-unsere-denkmuster-veraendert/https://www.neuromentaltraining.com/neuro-blog/neuroplastizitaet-denken-gehirn/ Möchtest Du Cathrin oder Kim auf einen Kaffee einladen und dafür die Episoden werbefrei hören? Dann klicke auf den folgenden Link: https://plus.acast.com/s/starke-frauen. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Mais um episódio de Shutdown o vosso podcast de Negócios e Tecnologia em Português! Subscrevam, deixem uma review e partilhem Doações: ⁠⁠https://ko-fi.com/shutdownpodcast⁠⁠ Links: Podcast Acquired: https://www.acquired.fm/ Meta AI: https://www.threads.net/@zuck/post/C56MFEKxl-x Universal vs TikTok: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/01/arts/music/universal-group-tiktok-music.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare Taylor Swift: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2024/apr/12/taylor-swift-music-tiktok-return-tortured-poets-department Tesla Cybertruck: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/19/business/tesla-cybertruck-recall.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare Drake: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5990i-uib6/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== ou https://open.spotify.com/track/4rOrnYhMSuwqaKIiiHogEp?si=f9d0a633305d40dd Oftamologistas vs AI: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pdig.0000341&utm_source=www.therundown.ai&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=meta-takes-on-chatgpt Nothing earbuds: https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/18/24133464/nothing-ear-a-specs-price-hands-on Champanhe e LVMH: https://thenextbigidea.pt/depois-da-loucura-dos-anos-20-vivida-na-pandemia-deixamos-de-beber-champanhe/ Halving: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/18/technology/bitcoin-halving-countdown.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare Outros Links: Álvaro Samagaio:⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://alvarosamagaio.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠Founder Tales: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.foundertales.pt/⁠

It's electric! An Electric Daisy, that is, also known as Toothache Plant, Buzz Buttons, Jambu, and a bunch of other things. Music by James Milor from Pixabay Information provided by: The effect of toothpicks containing flavoring and flavoring plus jambu extract (spilanthol) to promote salivation in patients diagnosed with opioid-induced dry mouth (xerostomia) by Bennet Davis, et al. (2017) https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2017.0402 Phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of Spilanthes acmella: A review by Suchita Dubey, et al. (2013) https://doi.org/10.1155%2F2013%2F423750 Rhamnogalacturonan from Acmella oleracea (L.) R.K. Jansen: Gastroprotective and ulcer healing properties in rats by Daniele Maria-Ferreira, et al. (2014) https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0084762 https://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/integrative-medicine/herbs/spilanthes-acmella-jambu https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/acmella-oleracea/ https://www.healthline.com/health/toothache-plant#summary https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acmella_oleracea

Dave and Matt discuss Kenyan 2:02 Marathoner Titus Ekiru being banned for 10 years as well as a disturbing study about doping in recreational sports. [Apologies about the poor audio on Matt's side on this episode] Show Notes Marathoner Banned for Doping -  https://www.reuters.com/sports/athletics/kenyan-marathon-runner-ekiru-receives-10-year-doping-ban-2023-10-16/ Article on Doping Prevalence - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4  Article on Triathlon doping Prevalence -  https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0078702&type=printable  WADA Survey -  https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/2022-03/Descriptive%20Report%20-%20Athlete%20Vulnerabilties%20-%2023-03-2022.pdf Article on Attitudes Towards Doping in Elite Adolescents -  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1440244021001456 

-- Finches Diversify in Decades, Opals Form in Months,  Man's Genetic Diversity in 200 Generations, C-14 Everywhere: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams present their classic program that led to the audience-favorites rsr.org/list-shows! See below and hear on today's radio program our list of Not So Old and Not So Slow Things! From opals forming in months to man's genetic diversity in 200 generations, and with carbon 14 everywhere it's not supposed to be (including in diamonds and dinosaur bones!), scientific observations fill the guys' most traditional list challenging those who claim that the earth is billions of years old. Many of these scientific finds demand a re-evaluation of supposed million and billion-year ages. * Finches Adapt in 17 Years, Not 2.3 Million: Charles Darwin's finches are claimed to have taken 2,300,000 years to diversify from an initial species blown onto the Galapagos Islands. Yet individuals from a single finch species on a U.S. Bird Reservation in the Pacific were introduced to a group of small islands 300 miles away and in at most 17 years, like Darwin's finches, they had diversified their beaks, related muscles, and behavior to fill various ecological niches. Hear about this also at rsr.org/spetner. * Opals Can Form in "A Few Months" And Don't Need 100,000 Years: A leading authority on opals, Allan W. Eckert, observed that, "scientific papers and textbooks have told that the process of opal formation requires tens of thousands of years, perhaps hundreds of thousands... Not true." A 2011 peer-reviewed paper in a geology journal from Australia, where almost all the world's opal is found, reported on the: "new timetable for opal formation involving weeks to a few months and not the hundreds of thousands of years envisaged by the conventional weathering model." (And apparently, per a 2019 report from Entomology Today, opals can even form around insects!) More knowledgeable scientists resist the uncritical, group-think insistence on false super-slow formation rates (as also for manganese nodules, gold veins, stone, petroleum, canyons and gullies, and even guts, all below). Regarding opals, Darwinian bias led geologists to long ignore possible quick action, as from microbes, as a possible explanation for these mineraloids. For both in nature and in the lab, opals form rapidly, not even in 10,000 years, but in weeks. See this also from creationists by a geologist, a paleobiochemist, and a nuclear chemist. * Finches Speciate in Two Generations vs Two Million Years for Darwin's Birds?  Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands are said to have diversified into 14 species over a period of two million years. But in 2017 the journal Science reported a newcomer to the Island which within two generations spawned a reproductively isolated new species. In another instance as documented by Lee Spetner, a hundred birds of the same finch species introduced to an island cluster a 1,000 kilometers from Galapagos diversified into species with the typical variations in beak sizes, etc. "If this diversification occurred in less than seventeen years," Dr. Spetner asks, "why did Darwin's Galapagos finches [as claimed by evolutionists] have to take two million years?" * Blue Eyes Originated Not So Long Ago: Not a million years ago, nor a hundred thousand years ago, but based on a peer-reviewed paper in Human Genetics, a press release at Science Daily reports that, "research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. A team at the University of Copenhagen have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye colour of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today." * Adding the Entire Universe to our List of Not So Old Things? Based on March 2019 findings from Hubble, Nobel laureate Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute and his co-authors in the Astrophysical Journal estimate that the universe is about a billion years younger than previously thought! Then in September 2019 in the journal Science, the age dropped precipitiously to as low as 11.4 billion years! Of course, these measurements also further squeeze the canonical story of the big bang chronology with its many already existing problems including the insufficient time to "evolve" distant mature galaxies, galaxy clusters, superclusters, enormous black holes, filaments, bubbles, walls, and other superstructures. So, even though the latest estimates are still absurdly too old (Google: big bang predictions, and click on the #1 ranked article, or just go on over there to rsr.org/bb), regardless, we thought we'd plop the whole universe down on our List of Not So Old Things!   * After the Soft Tissue Discoveries, NOW Dino DNA: When a North Carolina State University paleontologist took the Tyrannosaurus Rex photos to the right of original biological material, that led to the 2016 discovery of dinosaur DNA, So far researchers have also recovered dinosaur blood vessels, collagen, osteocytes, hemoglobin, red blood cells, and various proteins. As of May 2018, twenty-six scientific journals, including Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, Bone, and Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, have confirmed the discovery of biomaterial fossils from many dinosaurs! Organisms including T. Rex, hadrosaur, titanosaur, triceratops, Lufengosaur, mosasaur, and Archaeopteryx, and many others dated, allegedly, even hundreds of millions of years old, have yielded their endogenous, still-soft biological material. See the web's most complete listing of 100+ journal papers (screenshot, left) announcing these discoveries at bflist.rsr.org and see it in layman's terms at rsr.org/soft. * Rapid Stalactites, Stalagmites, Etc.: A construction worker in 1954 left a lemonade bottle in one of Australia's famous Jenolan Caves. By 2011 it had been naturally transformed into a stalagmite (below, right). Increasing scientific knowledge is arguing for rapid cave formation (see below, Nat'l Park Service shrinks Carlsbad Caverns formation estimates from 260M years, to 10M, to 2M, to it "depends"). Likewise, examples are growing of rapid formations with typical chemical make-up (see bottle, left) of classic stalactites and stalagmites including:- in Nat'l Geo the Carlsbad Caverns stalagmite that rapidly covered a bat - the tunnel stalagmites at Tennessee's Raccoon Mountain - hundreds of stalactites beneath the Lincoln Memorial - those near Gladfelter Hall at Philadelphia's Temple University (send photos to Bob@rsr.org) - hundreds of stalactites at Australia's zinc mine at Mt. Isa.   - and those beneath Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance. * Most Human Mutations Arose in 200 Generations: From Adam until Real Science Radio, in only 200 generations! The journal Nature reports The Recent Origin of Most Human Protein-coding Variants. As summarized by geneticist co-author Joshua Akey, "Most of the mutations that we found arose in the last 200 generations or so" (the same number previously published by biblical creationists). Another 2012 paper, in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology (Eugenie Scott's own field) on High mitochondrial mutation rates, shows that one mitochondrial DNA mutation occurs every other generation, which, as creationists point out, indicates that mtEve would have lived about 200 generations ago. That's not so old! * National Geographic's Not-So-Old Hard-Rock Canyon at Mount St. Helens: As our List of Not So Old Things (this web page) reveals, by a kneejerk reaction evolutionary scientists assign ages of tens or hundreds of thousands of years (or at least just long enough to contradict Moses' chronology in Genesis.) However, with closer study, routinely, more and more old ages get revised downward to fit the world's growing scientific knowledge. So the trend is not that more information lengthens ages, but rather, as data replaces guesswork, ages tend to shrink until they are consistent with the young-earth biblical timeframe. Consistent with this observation, the May 2000 issue of National Geographic quotes the U.S. Forest Service's scientist at Mount St. Helens, Peter Frenzen, describing the canyon on the north side of the volcano. "You'd expect a hard-rock canyon to be thousands, even hundreds of thousands of years old. But this was cut in less than a decade." And as for the volcano itself, while again, the kneejerk reaction of old-earthers would be to claim that most geologic features are hundreds of thousands or millions of years old, the atheistic National Geographic magazine acknowledges from the evidence that Mount St. Helens, the volcanic mount, is only about 4,000 years old! See below and more at rsr.org/mount-st-helens. * Mount St. Helens Dome Ten Years Old not 1.7 Million: Geochron Laboratories of Cambridge, Mass., using potassium-argon and other radiometric techniques claims the rock sample they dated, from the volcano's dome, solidified somewhere between 340,000 and 2.8 million years ago. However photographic evidence and historical reports document the dome's formation during the 1980s, just ten years prior to the samples being collected. With the age of this rock known, radiometric dating therefore gets the age 99.99999% wrong. * Devils Hole Pupfish Isolated Not for 13,000 Years But for 100: Secular scientists default to knee-jerk, older-than-Bible-age dates. However, a tiny Mojave desert fish is having none of it. Rather than having been genetically isolated from other fish for 13,000 years (which would make this small school of fish older than the Earth itself), according to a paper in the journal Nature, actual measurements of mutation rates indicate that the genetic diversity of these Pupfish could have been generated in about 100 years, give or take a few. * Polystrates like Spines and Rare Schools of Fossilized Jellyfish: Previously, seven sedimentary layers in Wisconsin had been described as taking a million years to form. And because jellyfish have no skeleton, as Charles Darwin pointed out, it is rare to find them among fossils. But now, reported in the journal Geology, a school of jellyfish fossils have been found throughout those same seven layers. So, polystrate fossils that condense the time of strata deposition from eons to hours or months, include: - Jellyfish in central Wisconsin were not deposited and fossilized over a million years but during a single event quick enough to trap a whole school. (This fossil school, therefore, taken as a unit forms a polystrate fossil.) Examples are everywhere that falsify the claims of strata deposition over millions of years. - Countless trilobites buried in astounding three dimensionality around the world are meticulously recovered from limestone, much of which is claimed to have been deposited very slowly. Contrariwise, because these specimens were buried rapidly in quickly laid down sediments, they show no evidence of greater erosion on their upper parts as compared to their lower parts.- The delicacy of radiating spine polystrates, like tadpole and jellyfish fossils, especially clearly demonstrate the rapidity of such strata deposition. - A second school of jellyfish, even though they rarely fossilized, exists in another locale with jellyfish fossils in multiple layers, in Australia's Brockman Iron Formation, constraining there too the rate of strata deposition. By the way, jellyfish are an example of evolution's big squeeze. Like galaxies evolving too quickly, galaxy clusters, and even human feet (which, like Mummy DNA, challenge the Out of Africa paradigm), jellyfish have gotten into the act squeezing evolution's timeline, here by 200 million years when they were found in strata allegedly a half-a-billion years old. Other examples, ironically referred to as Medusoid Problematica, are even found in pre-Cambrian strata. - 171 tadpoles of the same species buried in diatoms. - Leaves buried vertically through single-celled diatoms powerfully refute the claimed super-slow deposition of diatomaceous rock. - Many fossils, including a Mesosaur, have been buried in multiple "varve" layers, which are claimed to be annual depositions, yet they show no erosional patterns that would indicate gradual burial (as they claim, absurdly, over even thousands of years). - A single whale skeleton preserved in California in dozens of layers of diatom deposits thus forming a polystrate fossil. - 40 whales buried in the desert in Chile. "What's really interesting is that this didn't just happen once," said Smithsonian evolutionist Dr. Nick Pyenson. It happened four times." Why's that? Because "the fossil site has at least four layers", to which Real Science Radio's Bob Enyart replies: "Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha", with RSR co-host Fred Williams thoughtfully adding, "Ha ha!" * Polystrate Trees: Examples abound around the world of polystrate trees:  - Yellowstone's petrified polystrate forest (with the NPS exhibit sign removed; see below) with successive layers of rootless trees demonstrating the rapid deposition of fifty layers of strata. - A similarly formed polystrate fossil forest in France demonstrating the rapid deposition of a dozen strata. - In a thousand locations including famously the Fossil Cliffs of Joggins, Nova Scotia, polystrate fossils such as trees span many strata. - These trees lack erosion: Not only should such fossils, generally speaking, not even exist, but polystrates including trees typically show no evidence of erosion increasing with height. All of this powerfully disproves the claim that the layers were deposited slowly over thousands or millions of years. In the experience of your RSR radio hosts, evolutionists commonly respond to this hard evidence with mocking. See CRSQ June 2006, ICR Impact #316, and RSR 8-11-06 at KGOV.com. * Yellowstone Petrified Trees Sign Removed: The National Park Service removed their incorrect sign (see left and more). The NPS had claimed that in dozens of different strata over a 40-square mile area, many petrified trees were still standing where they had grown. The NPS eventually removed the sign partly because those petrified trees had no root systems, which they would have had if they had grown there. Instead, the trees of this "fossil forest" have roots that are abruptly broken off two or three feet from their trunks. If these mature trees actually had been remnants of sequential forests that had grown up in strata layer on top of strata layer, 27 times on Specimen Ridge (and 50 times at Specimen Creek), such a natural history implies passage of more time than permitted by biblical chronology. So, don't trust the National Park Service on historical science because they're wrong on the age of the Earth. * Wood Petrifies Quickly: Not surprisingly, by the common evolutionary knee-jerk claim of deep time, "several researchers believe that several millions of years are necessary for the complete formation of silicified wood". Our List of Not So Old and Not So Slow Things includes the work of five Japanese scientists who proved creationist research and published their results in the peer-reviewed journal Sedimentary Geology showing that wood can and does petrify rapidly. Modern wood significantly petrified in 36 years these researchers concluded that wood buried in strata could have been petrified in "a fairly short period of time, in the order of several tens to hundreds of years." * The Scablands: The primary surface features of the Scablands, which cover thousands of square miles of eastern Washington, were long believed to have formed gradually. Yet, against the determined claims of uniformitarian geologists, there is now overwhelming evidence as presented even in a NOVA TV program that the primary features of the Scablands formed rapidly from a catastrophic breach of Lake Missoula causing a massive regional flood. Of course evolutionary geologists still argue that the landscape was formed over tens of thousands of years, now by claiming there must have been a hundred Missoula floods. However, the evidence that there was Only One Lake Missoula Flood has been powerfully reinforced by a University of Colorado Ph.D. thesis. So the Scablands itself is no longer available to old-earthers as de facto evidence for the passage of millions of years. * The Heart Mountain Detachment: in Wyoming just east of Yellowstone, this mountain did not break apart slowly by uniformitarian processes but in only about half-an-hour as widely reported including in the evolutionist LiveScience.com, "Land Speed Record: Mountain Moves 62 Miles in 30 Minutes." The evidence indicates that this mountain of rock covering 425 square miles rapidly broke into 50 pieces and slid apart over an area of more than 1,300 square miles in a biblical, not a "geological," timeframe.  * "150 Million" year-old Squid Ink Not Decomposed: This still-writable ink had dehydrated but had not decomposed! The British Geological Survey's Dr. Phil Wilby, who excavated the fossil, said, "It is difficult to imagine how you can have something as soft and sloppy as an ink sac fossilised in three dimensions, still black, and inside a rock that is 150 million years old." And the Daily Mail states that, "the black ink was of exactly the same structure as that of today's version", just desiccated. And Wilby added, "Normally you would find only the hard parts like the shell and bones fossilised but... these creatures... can be dissected as if they are living animals, you can see the muscle fibres and cells. It is difficult to imagine... The structure is similar to ink from a modern squid so we can write with it..." Why is this difficult for evolutionists to imagine? Because as Dr. Carl Wieland writes, "Chemical structures 'fall apart' all by themselves over time due to the randomizing effects of molecular motion."Decades ago Bob Enyart broadcast a geology program about Mount St. Helens' catastrophic destruction of forests and the hydraulic transportation and upright deposition of trees. Later, Bob met the chief ranger from Haleakala National Park on Hawaii's island of Maui, Mark Tanaka-Sanders. The ranger agreed to correspond with his colleague at Yellowstone to urge him to have the sign removed. Thankfully, it was then removed. (See also AIG, CMI, and all the original Yellowstone exhibit photos.) Groundbreaking research conducted by creation geologist Dr. Steve Austin in Spirit Lake after Mount St. Helens eruption provided a modern-day analog to the formation of Yellowstone fossil forest. A steam blast from that volcano blew over tens of thousands of trees leaving them without attached roots. Many thousands of those trees were floating upright in Spirit Lake, and began sinking at varying rates into rapidly and sporadically deposited sediments. Once Yellowstone's successive forest interpretation was falsified (though like with junk DNA, it's too big to fail, so many atheists and others still cling to it), the erroneous sign was removed. * Asiatic vs. European Honeybees: These two populations of bees have been separated supposedly for seven million years. A researcher decided to put the two together to see what would happen. What we should have here is a failure to communicate that would have resulted after their "language" evolved over millions of years. However, European and Asiatic honeybees are still able to communicate, putting into doubt the evolutionary claim that they were separated over "geologic periods." For more, see the Public Library of Science, Asiatic Honeybees Can Understand Dance Language of European Honeybees. (Oh yeah, and why don't fossils of poorly-formed honeycombs exist, from the millions of years before the bees and natural selection finally got the design right? Ha! Because they don't exist! :) Nautiloid proves rapid limestone formation. * Remember the Nautiloids: In the Grand Canyon there is a limestone layer averaging seven feet thick that runs the 277 miles of the canyon (and beyond) that covers hundreds of square miles and contains an average of one nautiloid fossil per square meter. Along with many other dead creatures in this one particular layer, 15% of these nautiloids were killed and then fossilized standing on their heads. Yes, vertically. They were caught in such an intense and rapid catastrophic flow that gravity was not able to cause all of their dead carcasses to fall over on their sides. Famed Mount St. Helens geologist Steve Austin is also the world's leading expert on nautiloid fossils and has worked in the canyon and presented his findings to the park's rangers at the invitation of National Park Service officials. Austin points out, as is true of many of the world's mass fossil graveyards, that this enormous nautiloid deposition provides indisputable proof of the extremely rapid formation of a significant layer of limestone near the bottom of the canyon, a layer like the others we've been told about, that allegedly formed at the bottom of a calm and placid sea with slow and gradual sedimentation. But a million nautiloids, standing on their heads, literally, would beg to differ. At our sister stie, RSR provides the relevant Geologic Society of America abstract, links, and video. *  Now It's Allegedly Two Million Year-Old Leaves: "When we started pulling leaves out of the soil, that was surreal, to know that it's millions of years old..." sur-re-al: adjective: a bizarre mix of fact and fantasy. In this case, the leaves are the facts. Earth scientists from Ohio State and the University of Minnesota say that wood and leaves they found in the Canadian Arctic are at least two million years old, and perhaps more than ten million years old, even though the leaves are just dry and crumbly and the wood still burns! * Gold Precipitates in Veins in Less than a Second: After geologists submitted for decades to the assumption that each layer of gold would deposit at the alleged super slow rates of geologic process, the journal Nature Geoscience reports that each layer of deposition can occur within a few tenths of a second. Meanwhile, at the Lihir gold deposit in Papua New Guinea, evolutionists assumed the more than 20 million ounces of gold in the Lihir reserve took millions of years to deposit, but as reported in the journal Science, geologists can now demonstrate that the deposit could have formed in thousands of years, or far more quickly! Iceland's not-so-old Surtsey Island looks ancient. * Surtsey Island, Iceland: Of the volcanic island that formed in 1963, New Scientist reported in 2007 about Surtsey that "geographers... marvel that canyons, gullies and other land features that typically take tens of thousands or millions of years to form were created in less than a decade." Yes. And Sigurdur Thorarinsson, Iceland's chief  geologist, wrote in the months after Surtsey formed, "that the time scale," he had been trained "to attach to geological developments is misleading." [For what is said to] take thousands of years... the same development may take a few weeks or even days here [including to form] a landscape... so varied and mature that it was almost beyond belief... wide sandy beaches and precipitous crags... gravel banks and lagoons, impressive cliffs… hollows, glens and soft undulating land... fractures and faultscarps, channels and screes… confounded by what met your eye... boulders worn by the surf, some of which were almost round... -Iceland's chief geologist * The Palouse River Gorge: In the southeast of Washington State, the Palouse River Gorge is one of many features formed rapidly by 500 cubic miles of water catastrophically released with the breaching of a natural dam in the Lake Missoula Flood (which gouged out the Scablands as described above). So, hard rock can be breached and eroded rapidly. * Leaf Shapes Identical for 190 Million Years?  From Berkley.edu, "Ginkgo biloba... dates back to... about 190 million years ago... fossilized leaf material from the Tertiary species Ginkgo adiantoides is considered similar or even identical to that produced by modern Ginkgo biloba trees... virtually indistinguishable..." The literature describes leaf shapes as "spectacularly diverse" sometimes within a species but especially across the plant kingdom. Because all kinds of plants survive with all kinds of different leaf shapes, the conservation of a species retaining a single shape over alleged deep time is a telling issue. Darwin's theory is undermined by the unchanging shape over millions of years of a species' leaf shape. This lack of change, stasis in what should be an easily morphable plant trait, supports the broader conclusion that chimp-like creatures did not become human beings and all the other ambitious evolutionary creation of new kinds are simply imagined. (Ginkgo adiantoides and biloba are actually the same species. Wikipedia states, "It is doubtful whether the Northern Hemisphere fossil species of Ginkgo can be reliably distinguished." For oftentimes, as documented by Dr. Carl Werner in his Evolution: The Grand Experiment series, paleontogists falsely speciate identical specimens, giving different species names, even different genus names, to the fossil and living animals that appear identical.) * Box Canyon, Idaho: Geologists now think Box Canyon in Idaho, USA, was carved by a catastrophic flood and not slowly over millions of years with 1) huge plunge pools formed by waterfalls; 2) the almost complete removal of large basalt boulders from the canyon; 3) an eroded notch on the plateau at the top of the canyon; and 4) water scour marks on the basalt plateau leading to the canyon. Scientists calculate that the flood was so large that it could have eroded the whole canyon in as little as 35 days. See the journal Science, Formation of Box Canyon, Idaho, by Megaflood, and the Journal of Creation, and Creation Magazine. * Manganese Nodules Rapid Formation: Allegedly, as claimed at the Wikipedia entry from 2005 through 2021: "Nodule growth is one of the slowest of all geological phenomena – in the order of a centimeter over several million years." Wow, that would be slow! And a Texas A&M Marine Sciences technical slide presentation says, “They grow very slowly (mm/million years) and can be tens of millions of years old", with RWU's oceanography textbook also putting it at "0.001 mm per thousand years." But according to a World Almanac documentary they have formed "around beer cans," said marine geologist Dr. John Yates in the 1997 video Universe Beneath the Sea: The Next Frontier. There are also reports of manganese nodules forming around ships sunk in the First World War. See more at at youngearth.com, at TOL, in the print edition of the Journal of Creation, and in this typical forum discussion with atheists (at the Chicago Cubs forum no less :). * "6,000 year-old" Mitochondrial Eve: As the Bible calls "Eve... the mother of all living" (Gen. 3:20), genetic researchers have named the one woman from whom all humans have descended "Mitochondrial Eve." But in a scientific attempt to date her existence, they openly admit that they included chimpanzee DNA in their analysis in order to get what they viewed as a reasonably old date of 200,000 years ago (which is still surprisingly recent from their perspective, but old enough not to strain Darwinian theory too much). But then as widely reported including by Science magazine, when they dropped the chimp data and used only actual human mutation rates, that process determined that Eve lived only six thousand years ago! In Ann Gibbon's Science article, "Calibrating the Mitochondrial Clock," rather than again using circular reasoning by assuming their conclusion (that humans evolved from ape-like creatures), they performed their calculations using actual measured mutation rates. This peer-reviewed journal then reported that if these rates have been constant, "mitochondrial Eve… would be a mere 6000 years old." See also the journal Nature and creation.com's "A shrinking date for Eve," and Walt Brown's assessment. Expectedly though, evolutionists have found a way to reject their own unbiased finding (the conclusion contrary to their self-interest) by returning to their original method of using circular reasoning, as reported in the American Journal of Human Genetics, "calibrating against recent evidence for the divergence time of humans and chimpanzees,"  to reset their mitochondrial clock back to 200,000 years. * Even Younger Y-Chromosomal Adam: (Although he should be called, "Y-Chromosomal Noah.") While we inherit our mtDNA only from our mothers, only men have a Y chromosome (which incidentally genetically disproves the claim that the fetus is "part of the woman's body," since the little boy's y chromosome could never be part of mom's body). Based on documented mutation rates on and the extraordinary lack of mutational differences in this specifically male DNA, the Y-chromosomal Adam would have lived only a few thousand years ago! (He's significantly younger than mtEve because of the genetic bottleneck of the global flood.) Yet while the Darwinian camp wrongly claimed for decades that humans were 98% genetically similar to chimps, secular scientists today, using the same type of calculation only more accurately, have unintentionally documented that chimps are about as far genetically from what makes a human being a male, as mankind itself is from sponges! Geneticists have found now that sponges are 70% the same as humans genetically, and separately, that human and chimp Y chromosomes are  "horrendously" 30%

Hinton, M.S. et al. (no date) Estimating age of mule deer in the field: Can we move beyond broad age categories?, PLOS ONE. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0284565 (Accessed: 04 August 2023).   Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/paul-yudin/your-adrenaline License code: QWS1TG5BYTFK2PCL

This week, Jess and Scott discuss the topic of fetching. Fetch has been a buzz topic in the dog world as of late, so in this week's episode, they both try to equally cover the good, the bad, and the ugly.    Why should I be mindful when playing a simple game of fetch with my dog? How can switching from a ball to a disc make the game more safe? What could my dog do for exercise in replacement of fetch?   For a detailed video on how to dislodge a ball from your dog's throat, click: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v14poLgeYY0   For the study about Golden Retrievers and early spay/neuter, visit: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0055937&fbclid=IwAR3vwFyaTfnaEYMgb_bB-mLPiQmatSqU7jRJQvhBsUkrLDNY00OnOQD_uY0   For the study about Labs versus Goldens in regards to early spay/neuter, click: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0102241&fbclid=IwAR1m-lI82htdyn_weQ82zUGNDZu9mp9aKbiFOUMCUYKKuvtg3T2n-prrAz8     For more information about Scott and Jess and their strategies, please check out: https://caninehealing.com   To view The Quirky Dog's website and a full catalog of episodes, visit: https://www.thequirkydog.com   To work with Scott and Jess in person within their service area (Portland, ME to Boston, MA to Manchester, NH), email them at studio@thequirkydog.com     Have you ever wondered why your dog behaves a certain way? Are there things you need help with or support? Join Scott and Jess Williams each week as they explore these and other topics.   Follow and Watch Us On: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/caninehealing YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtlRQjjeIHOgEAAlgB3MviA Listen to Us On: PodBean: https://thequirkydog.podbean.com/   #ScottWilliamsDogTrainer #JessWilliamsDogTrainer #CanineHealing #TheQuirkyDog #DogTraining #Studio21PodcastCafe #UnitedPodcastNetwork

Le monde est fini ! Il n'est pas infini quoi, et ses ressources non plus. La nature produit continuellement de quoi nous nourrir et produire de l'énergie. Mais nous consommons plus quelle ne produit, nous tapons dans le capital et nous impactons violemment les écosystèmes. Ca ne va pas pouvoir durer, et assurément ceux qui nous gouvernent savent qu'ils doivent inféoder l'économie à cette réalité. Non ? Pour en parler nous recevons Rodolphe, alias le réveilleur, doctorant en sciences de l'environnement, et lui même vidéaste   Conseil de lecture (dans l'ordre): - "Les limites à la croissance dans un monde fini", Donella Meadows, Denis Meadows, Jorgen Randers -"'Economix" : la première histoire de l'économie en BD, Dan E. Burr et Michael Goodwin - "Comment tout peut s'effondrer", Pablo Servigne, Raphaël Stevens - "Le Capital au XXIème siècle", Thomas Piketty  Un blog sympathique sur l'environnement: https://alaingrandjean.fr/  L'article évoqué sur le lien Bonheur/PIB  : https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0079358 Chaînes Youtube sur l'économie et la finance:  Heu?reka : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7sXGI8p8PvKosLWagkK9wQ Stupid Economics : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyJDHgrsUKuWLe05GvC2lng ❤️Nous soutenir❤️ : https://linktr.ee/troncheenbiais  Lien Youtube du Live : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn5oGHBGFiA Invité : Le Réveilleur Animation : Acermendax et Vled Tapas  Technique : Maxime (Radio Campus Lorraine) Musique : Vled Tapas Design : Loki Jackal Editeur podcast : Corentin Savre  Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

O que é amizade pra você? Você tem muitos amigos e amigas? Essas amizades podem ser classificadas na sua cabeça? É mais fácil fazer amizades quando somos mais jovens ou quando somos mais velhos? E o que a ciência tem a dizer sobre tudo isso?Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (55min 49s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAAprofunde-se de vez: garantimos conhecimento com profundidade e diversidade, para se tornar um profissional em T - incluindo programação, front-end, data science, devops, ux & design, mobile, inovação & gestão.Navegue sua carreira: são mais de 1300 cursos e novos lançamentos toda semana, além de atualizações e melhorias constantes.Conteúdo imersivo: faça parte de uma comunidade de apaixonados por tudo que é digital. Mergulhe na comunidade Alura.Aproveite o desconto para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://bit.ly/naruhodo_alura*REFERÊNCIASSimilar neural responses predict friendshiphttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02722-7Neural Activity during Natural Viewing of Sesame Street Statistically Predicts Test Scores in Early Childhoodhttps://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001462The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social worldhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-020-00420-wTowards a neurosemiotics of friendshiphttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003051817-22/towards-neurosemiotics-friendship-claus-emmecheSocial Networks and Cognitionhttps://faculty.tuck.dartmouth.edu/images/uploads/faculty/adam-kleinbaum/SocialNetworksAndCognition.pdfWhat Does Homophily Do? A Review of the Consequences of Homophilyhttps://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/annals.2020.0230A ratio scale for social distancehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jeab.614?casa_token=QmPEyIu2T3cAAAAA:JKRV7DwKjRl-h1VrsLN3_rf7p9K3BNHJ6TdWrws5153geLVKpbMVdciylLH_TOowrnHiF-eB5hl7-ZfmSocial discounting and delay discountinghttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bdm.567?casa_token=JVIuMdWtMtgAAAAA:07Vu9ISpWq0TdeFvBnTgneCBOOheA259B9kUbofPaTIwiz3U2A7j1qC5oZepDkuGup7C7bZTtB9ocWKKSocial-interactive reward elicits similar neural response in autism and typical development and predicts future social experienceshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929323000026The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 2https://books.google.com.br/books?id=5m_D4NYVRI8C&redir_esc=yFriendship and its Implications for Mental Health or Social Competencehttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272431685053010Loneliness and the Big Five Personality Traits: A Meta–Analysishttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1002/per.2229Friendship in Later Life: A Research Agendahttps://academic.oup.com/innovateage/article/3/1/igz005/5423647The Anthropology of Friendship: Enduring Themes and Future Possibilitieshttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003135821-1/anthropology-friendship-enduring-themes-future-possibilities-sandra-bell-simon-colemanFriendship Quality and Social Developmenthttp://www2.psych.purdue.edu/~berndt/Friendship%20quality%20and%20social%20development.pdfThe Liking Gap in Conversations: Do People Like Us More Than We Think?https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797618783714Peer Functioning in Children with ADHDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2572031/Culture and Gender Differences in the Perception of Friendship by Adolescentshttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1080/002075996401089Thriving together: the benefits of women's social ties for physical, psychological and relationship healthhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rstb.2021.0441What Are Friends for in Russia Versus Canada?: An Approach for Documenting Cross-Cultural Differenceshttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10693971211024599Aristotle on the Forms of Friendshiphttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20126987Naruhodo #92 - Como funciona a "química" entre duas pessoas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtB7qEoNrIUNaruhodo #345 - Por que às vezes sentimos as dores dos outros?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKdMBCqy6XA&t=5sNaruhodo #331 - Pessoas sincronizam suas mentes quando estão juntas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JjxblfNjRkNaruhodo #230 - Por que quando olhamos para uma pessoa ela nos olha de volta?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_86RQ8y_peYNaruhodo #338 - Por que fofocamos?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ij9ocesTc50&t=1s*APOIE O NARUHODO PELA PLATAFORMA ORELO!Um aviso importantíssimo: o podcast Naruhodo agora está no Orelo: https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-oreloE é por meio dessa plataforma de apoio aos criadores de conteúdo que você ajuda o Naruhodo a se manter no ar.Você escolhe um valor de contribuição mensal e tem acesso a conteúdos exclusivos, conteúdos antecipados e vantagens especiais.Além disso, você pode ter acesso ao nosso grupo fechado no Telegram, e conversar comigo, com o Altay e com outros apoiadores.E não é só isso: toda vez que você ouvir ou fizer download de um episódio pelo Orelo, vai também estar pingando uns trocadinhos para o nosso projeto.Então, baixe agora mesmo o app Orelo no endereço Orelo.CC ou na sua loja de aplicativos e ajude a fortalecer o conhecimento científico.https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

It's the time of year for old acquaintances to be forgot, but SciShow Tangents has never been one to bow to convention! So this week, we're remembering all our dang acquaintances and way more as we dive deep on the concept of Memory! Want more Deboki? Check her out at https://twitter.com/okidoki_boki to find info on all of the many projects she works on!SciShow Tangents is on YouTube! Go to www.youtube.com/scishowtangents to check out this episode with the added bonus of seeing our faces! Head to www.patreon.com/SciShowTangents to find out how you can help support SciShow Tangents, and see all the cool perks you'll get in return, like bonus episodes and a monthly newsletter!And go to https://store.dftba.com/collections/scishow-tangents to buy your very own, genuine SciShow Tangents sticker!A big thank you to Patreon subscribers Garth Riley and Tom Mosner for helping to make the show possible!Follow us on Twitter @SciShowTangents, where we'll tweet out topics for upcoming episodes and you can ask the science couch questions! While you're at it, check out the Tangents crew on Twitter: Ceri: @ceriley Sam: @im_sam_schultz Hank: @hankgreen[Truth or Fail]Imprinting in generalhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.736999/fullhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726915/Pekin duckling different eye, different memorieshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347216302597?via%3Dihubhttps://phys.org/news/2016-11-ducklings-memory-banks-visual.htmlCalifornia condor puppet funeralshttps://www.nature.com/news/2007/070806/full/news070806-3.html#B1https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/zoo.20151Siberian cranes imprint for migrationhttps://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1377&context=nacwgprochttps://savingcranes.org/learn/species-field-guide/siberian-crane/https://amp.theguardian.com/news/2006/apr/01/guardianobituaries.mainsection[Trivia Question]Chaser (Border Collie) remembering unique object nameshttps://webs.wofford.edu/reidak/Pubs/Pilley%20and%20Reid%202011.pdfhttps://www.goupstate.com/story/news/2019/07/26/world-famous-dog-chaser-dies-at-15/4597342007/https://www.goupstate.com/story/news/2021/11/02/spartanburg-community-college-new-mascot-scc-chasers-chaser-the-border-collie-south-carolina/6199107001/[Fact Off]Taking Photos Makes Memory Worse https://www.binghamton.edu/news/story/3079/taking-photos-can-impair-your-memory-of-eventshttps://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/08/05/1022041431/to-remember-the-moment-try-taking-fewer-photos[Ask the Science Couch]Remembering commercial jingles rather than “important” names and dates https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fxge0001050https://muse.jhu.edu/article/269004https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0086170https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0305735611406578https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0305735611418553https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-35459-001https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.896285/full[Butt One More Thing]Poop amnesia or vasovagal syncopehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067056/https://www.iflscience.com/woman-loses-10-years-of-memories-due-to-bad-case-of-constipation-52589https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/constipated-woman-lost-10-years-of-memories-after-straining-too-hard/F5X2BVV6FWFXH7NNZZFG2IGEYA/ 

Today you'll learn about how time flies as we age, how scientists are learning more and more about the microbiome within a human body, and the potential for a new phone app that can predict when you might die.Time Flies “Why Does 'Time Fly' As We Get Older?” by Christopher Dwyerhttps://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/thoughts-thinking/202209/why-does-time-fly-we-get-older“Why time flies so fast as we get older” BY ABIGAIL SAWYERhttps://www.biotechniques.com/cell-and-tissue-biology/why-time-flies-as-we-get-older/Human Microbiome“Scientists Have Made A Human Microbiome From Scratch” by Carl Zimmerhttps://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/06/science/human-microbiome-bacteria.html“Design, construction, and in vivo augmentation of a complex gut microbiome” by Alice G. Cheng et al.https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(22)00990-4?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867422009904%3Fshowall%3DtrueSmartphone Death Predictor  “Your smartphone could be used to estimate your risk of dying” by Grace Wadehttps://www.newscientist.com/article/2343342-your-smartphone-could-be-used-to-estimate-your-risk-of-dying/“Smartphones could be used to predict a person's risk of dying, study finds” by Cathal Ryanhttps://www.buzz.ie/lifestyle/health/study-predict-mortality-rates-smartphone-28316953“Population analysis of mortality risk: Predictive models from passive monitors using motion sensors for 100,000 UK Biobank participants” by Haowen Zhou, Ruoqing Zhu, Anita Ung, and Bruce Schatzhttps://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pdig.0000045Follow Curiosity Daily on your favorite podcast app to get smarter with Calli and Nate — for free! Still curious? Get exclusive science shows, nature documentaries, and more real-life entertainment on discovery+! Go to https://discoveryplus.com/curiosity to start your 7-day free trial. discovery+ is currently only available for US subscribers.Find episode transcripts here: https://curiosity-daily-4e53644e.simplecast.com/episodes/time-flies-human-microbiome-smartphone-death-predictor

“Warning: Do Not Remove This Tag Under Penalty of Law”. For many years every pillow and mattress carried a tag with that warning. Today the language isn't quite so harsh, but the warning is still there. Why does anyone care whether or not the tag gets removed from your mattress? Listen as I explain. https://www.livescience.com/33039-why-do-mattresses-have-do-not-remove-tags.html Sleep is a natural part of your life. So why is it sometimes difficult to fall asleep and stay asleep? What is the latest scientific research on how to improve the quality and quantity of your sleep? To explain all this is Aric Prather, a world renowned sleep scientist and author of the book The Sleep Prescription: Seven Days to Unlocking Your Best Rest (https://amzn.to/3OKZWC7). Even if you think you have heard all the conventional wisdom about sleep – you probably haven't heard all of what Aric has to say. Listen today and sleep like a baby tonight.  When you think of assertive people, they are often folks you admire. Most likely that's because they seem to know what they want and are able to communicate it in a clear and confident way that is not offensive. We've likely all been in situations where we wish we spoke up and were more assertive yet somehow weren't able to do it. Here to help you understand how to be assertive is psychologist Randy Paterson author of The Assertiveness Handbook: How to Express Your Ideas and Stand Up for Yourself at Work and in Relationships (https://amzn.to/3GNDJ4C).  Most employees probably wish they got more praise and compliments from the boss. And if the boss is smart, he or she probably should. Listen as I explain the benefits of giving compliments and positive feedback – not only benefits for employees but for employers as well. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0048174 PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS! With Shopify, everything you need to customize your business to your needs is already in your hands. Sign up for a FREE trial at https://Shopify.com/sysk ! Constant Wonder is a podcast that will bring more wonder and awe to your day. Listen to Constant Wonder wherever you get your podcasts! https://www.byuradio.org/constantwonder Did you know you could reduce the number of unwanted calls & emails with Online Privacy Protection from Discover? - And it's FREE! Just activate it in the Discover App. See terms & learn more at https://Discover.com/Online You've earned your fun time. Go to the App Store or Google play to download Best Fiends for free. Plus, earn even more with $5 worth of in-game rewards when you reach level 5!  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Todo mundo tem algo que acha assustador, de filmes de terror a jogos macabros, passando por situações inesperadas.Mas como nosso cérebro e nosso corpo reagem a sustos? O que a ciência tem a dizer sobre isso?Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (51min 17s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAA Alura é a maior escola online de tecnologia e negócios digitais do Brasil.Com uma matricula você tem acesso as centenas de cursos online, com lançamentos e atualizações constantes nas áreas de programação, front-end, DevOps, Mobile, Data Science, UX & Design, Inovação e Gestão.E o melhor investimento que você pode fazer nesta Black Friday é no seu futuro.Sabe como?Aproveitando a chance única do maior desconto do ano na Alura: 25%, de 21 a 25 de novembro.Isso mesmo: 25% de desconto para aprofundar seus conhecimentos ou fazer a tão sonhada transição de carreira.Então aproveite a Black Friday Alura e chame suas amigas e seus amigos!Link: bit.ly/black-friday-alura-2022*REFERÊNCIASStartle Disease: New Molecular Insights into an Old Neurological Disorderhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10738584221104724Startle syndromeshttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(06)70470-7/fulltextMoro Reflex Newborn Test | Startle Reflex | Pediatric Nursing Assessmenthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AfkNg1i_LMHabituation of a startle responsehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kfu0FAAu-10Research Progress in the Study of Startle Reflex to Disease Stateshttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884703/STARTLE DISEASE OR HYPEREKPLEXIA FURTHER DELINEATION OF THE SYNDROMEhttps://academic.oup.com/brain/article-abstract/103/4/985/360048?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=falseThe glycinergic inhibitory synapsehttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/PL00000899Hyperekplexia and stiff-man syndrome: abnormal brainstem reflexes suggest a physiological relationshiphttps://jnnp.bmj.com/content/jnnp/75/9/1265.full.pdfELECTROCLINICAL FEATURES OF CONVULSIONS INDUCED BY STIMULATION OF BRAIN STEMhttps://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/jn.1958.21.5.430Startle syndromeshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474442206704707#fig1GLRB allelic variation associated with agoraphobic cognitions, increased startle response and fear network activation: a potential neurogenetic pathway to panic disorderhttps://www.nature.com/articles/mp20172The audiogenic startle response in Tourette's syndromhttps://movementdisorders.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mds.870100605Emotion modulation of the startle reflex in essential tremor: Blunted reactivity to unpleasant and pleasant pictureshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353802016304345?casa_token=a_uv0EAB-MAAAAAA:nVPXCMJIIN37x8BB_NeNa92WVKvWF3pu_TlOmOovfO1Lvd_JS0gVLXXRVCfObIp1ZIEkEA0KWosWhy twenty amino acid residue types suffice(d) to support all living systemshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0204883Graph theory analysis of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in essential tremorhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hbm.24730?casa_token=ff_kOBj_o6sAAAAA:-8X5s4r8fdMGtMObacCBwEgMc4SYkOjoi18srOLSd2TGR4OexMfcoMPgwpCkG14LPdbhMxtYT18HClbjNaruhodo #173 - O que são cacoetes?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Z3U2fqEYaINaruhodo #156 - O que é paralisia do sono?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9om8soj_uA&t=465sNaruhodo #217 - Por que algumas pessoas tremem?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7KLyBBnK_Q&t=12sNaruhodo #125 - Por que algumas pessoas passam mal ao ver sangue?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS7GWadZ9lINaruhodo #309 - Por que sentimos medo? - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNwl26ZbVD8Naruhodo #310 - Por que sentimos medo? - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqkh5IdfQQMNaruhodo #164 - Podemos ler emoções com base em expressões faciais?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cq4oeBZ5kgo&t=4sNaruhodo #130 - Por que fazemos caretas quando executamos algumas tarefas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvGdV1lS7f8*APOIE O NARUHODO PELA PLATAFORMA ORELO!Um aviso importantíssimo: o podcast Naruhodo agora está no Orelo: https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-oreloE é por meio dessa plataforma de apoio aos criadores de conteúdo que você ajuda o Naruhodo a se manter no ar.Você escolhe um valor de contribuição mensal e tem acesso a conteúdos exclusivos, conteúdos antecipados e vantagens especiais.Além disso, você pode ter acesso ao nosso grupo fechado no Telegram, e conversar comigo, com o Altay e com outros apoiadores.E não é só isso: toda vez que você ouvir ou fizer download de um episódio pelo Orelo, vai também estar pingando uns trocadinhos para o nosso projeto.Então, baixe agora mesmo o app Orelo no endereço Orelo.CC ou na sua loja de aplicativos e ajude a fortalecer o conhecimento científico.https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

Muitos jogos online oferecem os famosos "loot boxes", que são caixas de recompensas pagas, mas que trazem componentes de sorte.Também há os benefícios "pay to win", em que você compra vantagens e afins.Afinal, eles são perigosos?Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (50min 38s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAAprofunde-se de vez: garantimos conhecimento com profundidade e diversidade, para se tornar um profissional em T - incluindo programação, front-end, data science, devops, ux & design, mobile, inovação & gestão.Navegue sua carreira: são mais de 1300 cursos e novos lançamentos toda semana, além de atualizações e melhorias constantes.Conteúdo imersivo: faça parte de uma comunidade de apaixonados por tudo que é digital. Mergulhe na comunidade Alura.Aproveite o desconto para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://bit.ly/naruhodo_alura*REFERÊNCIASResistance to extinction as a function of percentage of reinforcement, number of training trials, and conditioned reinforcementhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5908814/The Janus-Faced Role of Gambling Flow in Addiction Issueshttps://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/cyber.2016.0453Variety of gambling activities from adolescence to age 30 and association with gambling problems: a 15-year longitudinal study of a general population samplehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/add.13083?casa_token=kzfbg0tpFFsAAAAA:11YwPuYh2WHDHJAMTCYF7RUEeDIxk7RsLW4hvDSQoxj6feQ9ecRRhO5GRo_yKeFANFQpF4S7hh6otpPETemporal orientation and perceived control as determinants of risk-takinghttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022103166900758Dark Flow, Depression and Multiline Slot Machine Playhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9695-1The brave blue world: Facebook flow and Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD)https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0201484Schedules of Reinforcementhttps://www.google.com.br/books/edition/Schedules_of_Reinforcement/xctyCQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0Internet gaming disorder: Feeling the flow of social gameshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853218301032Altered neural correlates of reward and loss processing during simulated slot-machine fMRI in pathological gambling and cocaine dependence☆https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266109/Gambling Severity Predicts Midbrain Response to Near-Miss Outcomeshttps://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/30/18/6180.full.pdfVideo game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: Results of a large-scale surveyhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0206767Associations between loot box use, problematic gaming and gambling, and gambling-related cognitionshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460318315077Dutch Gambling Authority vs Electronic Arts, and the future of loot boxeshttps://www.gamesindustry.biz/dutch-gambling-authority-vs-electronic-arts-the-end-of-loot-boxes-as-legislative-black-boxesThe prevalence of loot boxes in mobile and desktop gameshttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/add.14973?casa_token=A030xGdCc7cAAAAA:WCmlQWOT9_uh89sOXpjqLcTcZcPcnRSWKzE6KQiMm6WMB3ztAHcfG6qI8CNRhHbH8VobDahrV2F3hxTWLoot box engagement and problem gambling among adolescent gamers: Findings from a national surveyhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460319310007?casa_token=u9Ake6SttRUAAAAA:jAkQRxlALHm2odFtqAztw4XzbfI-984t8gS0VLIjPFFADksNJ6tCA1kBdL5HBbSv7LF4MRYTX7cDSM­5 Diagnostic Criteria: Gambling Disorderhttps://www.ncpgambling.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/DSM-5-Diagnostic-Criteria-Gambling-Disorder.pdfThe changing face of desktop video game monetisation: An exploration of exposure to loot boxes, pay to win, and cosmetic microtransactions in the most-played Steam games of 2010-2019https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232780Rare Loot Box Rewards Trigger Larger Arousal and Reward Responses, and Greater Urge to Open More Loot Boxeshttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-019-09913-5Problem gamblers spend less money when loot boxes are removed from a game: a before and after study of Heroes of the Stormhttps://peerj.com/articles/7700/Fortnite microtransaction spending was associated with peers' purchasing behaviors but not gaming disorder symptomshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460319310585?casa_token=6nJDEoR5pS0AAAAA:Iknu6yqP4TrV9mz_FeNlIVgMb-v4HniS6m0D92hAJxaDBBswnG2tK6J-Nx_gJVWUDmHv1aWXQ6oNaruhodo #39 - A ignorância é uma benção?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIKhzU6VNy8&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #218 - Existe a tal "sorte de principiante"?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOWxol6g4kc&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #169 - Pessoas que publicam frases motivacionais são menos inteligentes?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0MXsp7KA4A&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #49 - O que causa o vício?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--Z_ylPXIWc&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodo*APOIE O NARUHODO PELA PLATAFORMA ORELO!Um aviso importantíssimo: o podcast Naruhodo agora está no Orelo: https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-oreloE é por meio dessa plataforma de apoio aos criadores de conteúdo que você ajuda o Naruhodo a se manter no ar.Você escolhe um valor de contribuição mensal e tem acesso a conteúdos exclusivos, conteúdos antecipados e vantagens especiais.Além disso, você pode ter acesso ao nosso grupo fechado no Telegram, e conversar comigo, com o Altay e com outros apoiadores.E não é só isso: toda vez que você ouvir ou fizer download de um episódio pelo Orelo, vai também estar pingando uns trocadinhos para o nosso projeto.Então, baixe agora mesmo o app Orelo no endereço Orelo.CC ou na sua loja de aplicativos e ajude a fortalecer o conhecimento científico.https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

Join hosts Amy Gordon (therapist) and Meg Specksgoor (comedian) in interviewing Angel Merritt (Professional Legal Guardian and Community Health Worker). In this podcast they discuss the dire state of queer mental health and some personal and systemic suggestions for creating a safer world for LGBTQIA2S+ folks. Transcription available @ https://www.rev.com/transcript-editor/shared/UrviQppbQB-a9cmLtEU1yvWlZ7TaDcoKqu_1KIj_uGEKfb5PoFjLhSXpNeZqHCImFaQh2ns3p7qVT4H1qmmhNeeh8zk?loadFrom=SharedLink References and Resources: Bailey, M. (n.d.). The danger of hiding who you are | Morgana Bailey - YouTube. Retrieved June 16, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2gbcVaZ448 Fish, Jessica N. “Future Directions in Understanding and Addressing Mental Health among LGBTQ Youth.” Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, vol. 49, no. 6, Nov. 2020, pp. 943–56. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1815207 Forstag EH, editor. Reducing Inequalities Between Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Adolescents and Cisgender, Heterosexual Adolescents: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2022 Jan 6. 5, Promising Interventions in Mental, Emotional, and Physical Health. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK578801/ Glossary of terms. Human Rights Campaign. (n.d.). Retrieved June 15, 2022, from https://www.hrc.org/resources/glossary-of-terms Meyer, Ilan H., et al. “Minority Stress, Distress, and Suicide Attempts in Three Cohorts of Sexual Minority Adults: A U.S. Probability Sample.” PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, 3 Mar. 2021, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0246827. Rethink.org. LGBT+ Mental Health. (n.d.). Retrieved June 15, 2022, from https://www.rethink.org/advice-and-information/living-with-mental-illness/wellbeing-physical-health/lgbtplus-mental-health/ Sage USA https://www.sageusa.org/what-we-do/?gclid=Cj0KCQjworiXBhDJARIsAMuzAuwpH_bV-VxK6L3u7vBx7Gpsy6jpiZueN3aHGfRID-yj8TuJcNR9XMsaAkSBEALw_wcB Jillian C. Shipherd PhD, Kelly E. Green PhD & Sarah Abramovitz BA (2010) Transgender Clients: Identifying and Minimizing Barriers to Mental Health Treatment, Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19359701003622875 The Trevor Project. (2022, May 18). Retrieved June 15, 2022, from https://www.thetrevorproject.org/resources/article/facts-about-lgbtq-youth-suicide/ Zambon, V. (2021, February 12). Depression and sexual orientation: Where to find support. Medical News Today. Retrieved June 15, 2022, from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/lgbtqia-and-depression

Um violinista toca num palco. A platéia ouve atenta.Um experimento monitorou as atividades cerebrais de todas essas pessoas e identificou uma sincronização neural entre elas e até mesmo diferenças entre os sexos biológicos.A ciência explica isso de que forma? Vale também para aulas ou podcasts?Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (52min 25s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAA Alura tem mais de 1.000 cursos de diversas áreas e é a maior plataforma de cursos online do Brasil -- e você tem acesso a todos com uma única assinatura.Aproveite o desconto de R$100 para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://bit.ly/naruhodo_alura*REFERÊNCIASMusicians And Their Audiences Show Synchronised Patterns Of Brain Activityhttps://digest.bps.org.uk/2020/03/23/musicians-and-their-audiences-show-synchronised-patterns-of-brain-activity/Sonata in D by Christian Gottlieb Scheidlerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iq9ZdO2flUg&ab_channel=GuitarSarasotaThe averaged inter-brain coherence between the audience and a violinist predicts the popularity of violin performancehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920301427?dgcid=rss_sd_allCardiac and Respiratory Patterns Synchronize between Persons during Choir Singinghttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0024893Interactive Brain Activity: Review and Progress on EEG-Based Hyperscanning in Social Interactionshttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01862/full#h1Neuroelectrical Hyperscanning Measures Simultaneous Brain Activity in Humanshttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10548-010-0147-9Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysishttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01663-5Speaker gaze increases information coupling between infant and adult brains.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325678441_Speaker_gaze_increases_information_coupling_between_infant_and_adult_brainsBrain-to-Brain Synchrony Tracks Real-World Dynamic Group Interactions in the Classroomhttps://vanbavellab.hosting.nyu.edu/documents/Dikker.etal.2017.CB.pdfHyper-Brain Networks Support Romantic Kissing in Humanshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0112080Concurrent mapping of brain activation from multiple subjects during social interaction by hyperscanning: a mini-reviewhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177358/Gender difference in spontaneous deception: A hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopyhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-06764-1Synchronous brain activity during cooperative exchange depends on gender of partner: A fNIRS-based hyperscanning studyhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hbm.22754?casa_token=UH1NPVDnfRUAAAAA:-AWw579DLZYX0s6XgjHcGSD6dT3SZR0ofEWjY-DuOnKJw2HSWRB3VXUYTNXapZ1VJvCcwTazMjp3mUiYDyad sex composition effect on inter-brain synchronization in face-to-face cooperationhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11682-020-00361-zThe “gift effect” on functional brain connectivity. Inter-brain synchronization when prosocial behavior is in actionhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-62421-0Inter-brain synchronization is weakened by the introduction of external punishmenthttps://academic.oup.com/scan/advance-article/doi/10.1093/scan/nsab124/6432385?login=trueInter-brain synchrony in teams predicts collective performancehttps://academic.oup.com/scan/article/16/1-2/43/5912973?login=trueBrain-to-brain entrainment: EEG interbrain synchronization while speaking and listeninghttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-04464-4?p=1778Oxytocin enhances inter-brain synchrony during social coordination in male adults https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/11/12/1882/2544478?login=trueInter-brain EEG connectivity in hyperscanning for Italian and French gestures: the culture-related nonverbal languagehttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40167-021-00103-yInter-Brain Synchronization During Sandplay Therapy: Individual Analyseshttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723211/fullAutism Symptoms Modulate Interpersonal Neural Synchronization in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Cooperative Interactionshttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10548-019-00731-xDynamics of frontal alpha asymmetry in mother-infant dyads: Insights from the Still Face Paradigmhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638320301284?casa_token=kM4RuPxDaicAAAAA:aJL5eG8DXiB-dkjFnMUq-gE84Zzrzn23zIfNAgUHK61Liy_OqtV98Gir02d8I5hR9b0yJNoAz6UNeuralink se aproxima de testes humanos e preocupa especialistashttps://olhardigital.com.br/2022/01/27/ciencia-e-espaco/neuralink-se-aproxima-de-testes-humanos-e-preocupa-especialistas/Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysishttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01663-5Elon Musk's Neuralink confirms monkeys died in project, denies animal cruelty claimshttps://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/17/business/elon-musk-neuralink-animal-cruelty-intl-scli/index.htmlA high-performance brain–computer interfacehttps://www.nature.com/articles/nature04968#article-infoNaruhodo #292 - Por que mexemos as mãos quando falamos?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4LJfliC46E&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #215 - Por que uma multidão cantando parece afinada?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJypXtz3bZM&t=3s&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #266 - Por que vemos luzes quando fechamos os olhos?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_4r_ZGb4wA&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodo*APOIE O NARUHODO PELA PLATAFORMA ORELO!Um aviso importantíssimo: o podcast Naruhodo agora está no Orelo: https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-oreloE é por meio dessa plataforma de apoio aos criadores de conteúdo que você ajuda o Naruhodo a se manter no ar.Você escolhe um valor de contribuição mensal e tem acesso a conteúdos exclusivos, conteúdos antecipados e vantagens especiais.Além disso, você pode ter acesso ao nosso grupo fechado no Telegram, e conversar comigo, com o Altay e com outros apoiadores.E não é só isso: toda vez que você ouvir ou fizer download de um episódio pelo Orelo, vai também estar pingando uns trocadinhos para o nosso projeto.Então, baixe agora mesmo o app Orelo no endereço Orelo.CC ou na sua loja de aplicativos e ajude a fortalecer o conhecimento científico.https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

Buddhist Mindfulness Sorcery is being taught in schools and churches as if it is a helpful method for dealing with anxiety, stress, depression and other mental health issues. Marcia Montenegro video: https://youtu.be/wQ6vHSaAdVg Ray Yungen: The Danger of Contemplative Prayer https://youtu.be/ei2qc2jU1lo Varieties of Contemplative Experience: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0176239#sec028 My video called Contemplative Mysticism is Spiritual Adultery, part 1 https://youtu.be/VuJ_ft4wYtw My second video called Contemplative Mysticism is Spiritual Adultery, part 2. https://youtu.be/NTgQbyqA0NY My book, Shrewd as Serpents: Discerning Antichrist Influences within Christianity: https://www.amazon.com/Shrewd-Serpents-Discerning-Antichrist-Influences-ebook/dp/B086MMNSHM/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=shrewd+as+serpents&qid=1592695127&sr=8-1 My book, Deliver Us from Addiction: Confessions of an Alcoholic's Wife in the Word of Faith New Apostolic Reformation

O chamado "marketing digital" costuma falar muito em "gatilhos mentais", como se determinadas coisas garantissem um determinado comportamento.Mas de onde vem isso? É correta a utilização do termo "gatilho" nesses casos? O que a ciência pode dizer sobre o assunto?Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (49min 06s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAA Alura tem mais de 1.000 cursos de diversas áreas e é a maior plataforma de cursos online do Brasil -- e você tem acesso a todos com uma única assinatura.Aproveite o desconto de R$100 para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://bit.ly/naruhodo_alura*REFERÊNCIASWhy a nudge is not enough: A social identity critique of governance by stealthhttps://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12073Feeding the behavioral revolution : Contributions of behavior analysis to nudging and vice versahttps://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Feeding-the-behavioral-revolution-%3A-Contributions-Simon-Amarilli/6cd7fbed8bf7ac3aa058c4f59375b3b094ab3facFrom Libertarian Paternalism to Nudging—and Beyondhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13164-015-0268-xWhy We Should Reject ‘Nudge'https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01430.xOn the misplaced politics of behavioural policyinterventionshttps://scholar.harvard.edu/files/todd_rogers/files/tannenbaum_fox_rogers.2017.pdfDebate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge*https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daniel-Hausman/publication/229562409_Debate_To_Nudge_or_Not_to_Nudge/links/570a43bf08ae8883a1fbc6f4/Debate-To-Nudge-or-Not-to-Nudge.pdfENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS THAT INCREASE THE FOOD INTAKE AND CONSUMPTION VOLUME OF UNKNOWING CONSUMERShttps://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132140A deterministic worldview promotes approval of state paternalismhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103116300300?via%3DihubEffect of ambience on food intake and food choicehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0899900704001510Wine and music (III): so what if music influences the taste of the wine?https://flavourjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13411-015-0046-9$ or Dollars: Effects of Menu-price Formats on Restaurant Checkshttps://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/71169THE INFLUENCE OF AUDITORY CUES ON THE PERCEPTION OF, AND RESPONSES TO, FOOD AND DRINKhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00267.xPlating manifesto (II): the art and science of platinghttps://flavourjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2044-7248-3-4Does the weight of the dish influence our perception of food?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950329311000966What you touch, touches you: The influence of haptic attributes on consumer product impressionshttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mar.21433?casa_token=wWJUGY71tJ8AAAAA:BYVlqFryvnM1Xlz6HUnxttdU2F6633j6iWpkKyMHv-Tr8KYrESE658koCndAasjIRI6a5nGF-AftJc5-The Roles of Inducer Size and Distance in the Ebbinghaus Illusion (Titchener Circles)https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p5273Do metallic-coated cups affect the perception of specialty coffees? An exploratory studyhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878450X20301621?casa_token=hc0MyRWtQKoAAAAA:zPWoLAczGe9yeooiKQyzQ_0iUj1VyeFVkvrnjX5aIw0CEo5rIrskCd9rbI-KkNv_gmX7nv_6s5cKitchenscapes, Tablescapes, Platescapes, and Foodscapes: Influences of Microscale Built Environments on Food Intakehttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013916506295574All you can eat or all you can waste? Effects of alternate serving styles and inducements on food waste in buffet restaurantshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13683500.2020.1870939?casa_token=BZcRujC3s0EAAAAA%3AasFIpv4_bR7b5HpbaVVW7mIwgKWU2awavjETNvgfZsUWIVQVT9jI5fYqz36nl7pklgaV6kufk01bpQInfluence of the glassware on the perception of alcoholic drinkshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950329315000907Glass Shape Influences Consumption Rate for Alcoholic Beverageshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0043007Naruhodo #38 - Beber água em copo pequeno mata a sede mais rápido?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb1cg3N_rU8&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #208 - Qual o efeito da publicidade sobre as crianças? - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2s-p8D0MTc&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #209 - Qual o efeito da publicidade sobre as crianças? - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS3Sc21lEZU&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #281 - Aprendemos mais quando somos punidos?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hy-SRTS9pW0&t=49s&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #155 - Tomar decisões cansa o nosso cérebro?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqEfVCT4dGo&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #139 - Por que crianças ricas vão melhor no teste do marshmallow?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1uiXbZzsOM&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodo*APOIE O NARUHODO PELA PLATAFORMA ORELO!Um aviso importantíssimo: o podcast Naruhodo agora está no Orelo: https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-oreloE é por meio dessa plataforma de apoio aos criadores de conteúdo que você ajuda o Naruhodo a se manter no ar.Você escolhe um valor de contribuição mensal e tem acesso a conteúdos exclusivos, conteúdos antecipados e vantagens especiais.Além disso, você pode ter acesso ao nosso grupo fechado no Telegram, e conversar comigo, com o Altay e com outros apoiadores.E não é só isso: toda vez que você ouvir ou fizer download de um episódio pelo Orelo, vai também estar pingando uns trocadinhos para o nosso projeto.Então, baixe agora mesmo o app Orelo no endereço Orelo.CC ou na sua loja de aplicativos e ajude a fortalecer o conhecimento científico.https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

Tem gente que desperta e dá bom dia para o sol.Mas tem muita gente que acorda mal humorada e demora até mesmo para conseguir socializar.Por que isso acontece?Confira no papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (57min 43s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAA Alura tem mais de 1.000 cursos de diversas áreas e é a maior plataforma de cursos online do Brasil -- e você tem acesso a todos com uma única assinatura.Aproveite o desconto de R$100 para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://www.alura.com.br/promocao/naruhodo *PARCERIA: ACTConheça a campanha "Viva melhor, beba menos", realizada pela OPAS, Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde, com apoio da ACT Promoção da Saúde. O podcast Naruhodo apoia essa iniciativa.Acesse: twitter.com/OPASOMSBrasil*REFERÊNCIASA marker for the end of adolescencehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982204009285Morningness and eveningness personality: A survey in literature from 1995 up till 2006https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886907002516GWAS of 89,283 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with self-reporting of being a morning personhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms10448Distribution and heritability of diurnal preference (chronotype) in a rural Brazilian family-based cohort, the Baependi studyhttps://www.nature.com/articles/srep09214DIURNAL PREFERENCE AND SLEEP QUALITY: SAME GENES? A STUDY OF YOUNG ADULT TWINShttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/07420521003663801The Physiological Period Length of the Human Circadian Clock In Vivo Is Directly Proportional to Period in Human Fibroblastshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0013376Molecular interrogation of hypothalamic organization reveals distinct dopamine neuronal subtypeshttps://www.nature.com/articles/nn.4462A Cryptochrome 2 mutation yields advanced sleep phase in humanshttps://elifesciences.org/articles/16695Phenotyping of PER3 variants reveals widespread effects on circadian preference, sleep regulation, and healthhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1087079217301387?casa_token=FwV3rbinBKIAAAAA:aDnC_DtGS5fX3ywDD02sahy2DHaVizxLxo9u3CsUEJFNnh9-QOG5ywZwaWnCsQzquqvAZ3Cx0frpTime for Bed: Genetic Mechanisms Mediating the Circadian Regulation of Sleephttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168952518300015?casa_token=8Uw_zcyy8dQAAAAA:KZVL7DFZq7YoX101uSgWs6frxgMa5LxezgGInYOOeoDNoqIHzAyUSfEDHJ4OlW9HA1ggaKhZ4n-kExtreme morning chronotypes are often familial and not exceedingly rare: the estimated prevalence of advanced sleep phase, familial advanced sleep phase, and advanced sleep–wake phase disorder in a sleep clinic population.https://academic.oup.com/sleep/article/42/10/zsz148/5542813?login=trueChronotype Genetic Variant in PER2 is Associated with Intrinsic Circadian Period in Humanshttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-41712-1A PERIOD3 variant causes a circadian phenotype and is associated with a seasonal mood traithttps://www.pnas.org/content/113/11/E1536.abstract?sid=9d1fba25-6642-4bb6-8048-756dbb5e2f13Sleep and Mood: Chicken or Egg?https://escholarship.org/content/qt1zj3s69s/qt1zj3s69s.pdfExposure to jet lag aggravates depression-like behaviors and age-related phenotypes in rats subject to chronic corticosteronehttps://academic.oup.com/abbs/article/51/8/834/5533128?login=trueCircadian preference and academic achievement in school-aged students: a systematic review and a longitudinal investigation of reciprocal relationshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07420528.2021.1926473?casa_token=8CHiH2ACoMUAAAAA%3A-kvhljaeiSNlZi7SA58yc1OzZiauLTPG1pwvk7ExalVaSPSTRD3IP95xudyvpraYH4bxSjC440KkL3IAge, the Big Five, and time-of-day preference: A mediational modelhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913012592?via%3DihubLarks, owls, swifts, and woodcocks among fruit flies: differential responses of four heritable chronotypes to long and hot summer dayshttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016586/Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: Cell Autonomy and Network Propertieshttps://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135919Morningness–eveningness, sleep–wake variables and big five personality factorshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886907002516Night eating patterns and chronotypes: A correlation with binge eating behaviorshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886908000974Chronotype Differences in Health Behaviors and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Population-Based Study Among Aged and Older AdultsAutoMEQ - https://chronotype-self-test.info/index.php?sid=61524&newtest=YNaruhodo #5 - É possivel recuperar uma noite mal dormida dormindo mais na noite seguinte?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-JN2qagigY&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #129 - Sono polifásico funciona segundo a ciência?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6AfuI46VhQ&t=3s&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #245 - Por que sempre tem espaço pro doce?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMRAGpdXEp8&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #256 - Porque roncamos?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-256-por-que-roncamos/Naruhodo #188 - Contar carneirinhos faz a gente dormir mais rápido?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Txu8-QTZB7IPodcasts das #Minas: PERGUNTA DE QUINTA - É PAU É PEDRA#MulheresPodcastershttps://open.spotify.com/show/7wpw0VXhWurAofD2zeJgsm*APOIE O NARUHODO!Você sabia que pode ajudar a manter o Naruhodo no ar?Ao contribuir, você pode ter acesso ao grupo fechado no Telegram, receber conteúdos exclusivos e ter vantagens especiais.Assine o apoio mensal pelo PicPay (https://picpay.me/naruhodopodcast), pelo Apoia-se (https://apoia.se/naruhodopodcast) ou ainda, para pessoas que moram fora do Brasil, pelo Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/naruhodopodcast).

O que é medo?Como funcionam os mecanismos que nos fazem sentir medo?Quais as quatro causas aristotélicas para o medo?Confira a parte 2, de duas partes, no papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Participação Especial: Dra. Ana Arantes (@AninhaArantes)Psicóloga com Mestrado em Educação Especial e Doutorado em Psicologia (Comportamento e Cognição) pela UFSCAR. Atuou como docente e pesquisadora associada no Departamento de Psicologia da UFSCar de 2013 a 2019. Atualmente é Sócia Diretora da Realize Consultoria, Supervisão e Treinamento em ABA, atuando como consultora para diversos prestadores de serviços em ABA para crianças autistas em diversos estados do Brasil. Também participante do time de ciências do Nerdcast e do podcast Cafezinho & Comportamento, que fala sobre os fenômenos comportamentais no dia-a-dia . Além disso, é membra fundadora do Coletivo Feminista Marias & Amélias de Mulheres Analistas do Comportamento e líder do Grupo de Pesquisas sobre Análise Comportamental das Práticas Culturais de Opressão de Gênero e Raça, desenvolvendo pesquisa teórico-conceitual nas interfaces entre o Behaviorismo Radical e o Feminismo Radical e atua em ações de fomento à participação e representatividade feminina na área.Participação Especial: Cesar Coelho (@coelho_cao)Biólogo pela UNESP Botucatu, PhD em ciências pelo departamento de Psicobiologia UNIFESP e Pós-doutorando no Instituto de pesquisa do Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canadá.> OUÇA (53min 18s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAA Alura tem mais de 1.000 cursos de diversas áreas e é a maior plataforma de cursos online do Brasil -- e você tem acesso a todos com uma única assinatura.A partir do dia 22 de novembro, você vai ter acesso ao MAIOR DESCONTO DA HISTORIA DA ALURA. Então espera até semana que vem que vai valer a pena!*PARCERIA: BINOMOBinomo é um aplicativo muito simples de se usar para realizar negociações online de diversos ativos. E tem promoção: utilizando o cupom NARUHODO, você vai dobrar o seu primeiro depósito real. Mas fique atento: esse código é válido apenas por tempo limitado! Acesse binomo.comATENÇÃO: Essa modalidade de investimento traz um nível elevado de risco financeiro.*REFERÊNCIASTHE ORGANIZATION OF AGGRESSION AND FEAR IN VERTEBRATEShttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-7572-6_7.pdfDifferences in Fear of Isolation as an explanation of Cultural Differences: Evidence from memory and reasoninghttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103105000752?via%3DihubFear of Victimization: A Look at the Proximate Causeshttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2578277?origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contentsHuman brain evolution and the “Neuroevolutionary Time-depth Principle:”Implications for the Reclassification of fear-circuitry-related traits in DSM-Vand for studying resilience to warzone-related posttraumatic stress disorderhttp://cogprints.org/5013/1/2006_P.N.P._Neuro-evolution_of_fear_circuit_disorders.pdfSpecific phobiashttps://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lanpsy/PIIS2215-0366(18)30169-X.pdfNeuroimaging in specific phobia disorder: a systematic review of the literaturehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22392396/The cross-national epidemiology of specific phobia in the World Mental Health Surveyshttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5674525/Fear of Darkness, the Full Moon and the Nocturnal Ecology of African Lionshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0022285Medos sociais dos brasileiroshttps://www.scielo.br/j/osoc/a/NjxYpZW7HWjT3gnfvmFqmnR/?lang=ptBehavioral Responses to a Repetitive Visual Threat Stimulus Express a Persistent State of Defensive Arousal in Drosophilahttps://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(15)00411-XThreat induces cardiac and metabolic changes that negatively impact survival in flieshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221013671Tendency to inspect predators predicts mortality risk in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article-abstract/3/2/124/218010AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN CHILDREN'S FEARShttps://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00375.xChildren's nighttime fears: parent–child ratings of frequency, content, origins, coping behaviors and severityhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0005796799001552Contributions of the Amygdala to Emotion Processing: From Animal Models to Human Behaviorhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627305008238Judgments of Risk Frequencies: Tests of Possible Cognitive Mechanisms.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-08130-003Common childhood fears and their originshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0005796797000508A meta-analysis of instructed fear studies: Implications for conscious appraisal of threathttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053811909010192Contextual modulation of conditioned responses in humans: A review on virtual reality studieshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735821001380Intolerance of uncertainty is associated with heightened responding in the prefrontal cortex during cue-signalled uncertainty of threathttps://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13415-021-00932-7Virtual reality exposure therapy for Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-18714-007Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618516300469Cognitive Factors that Maintain Social Anxiety Disorder: a Comprehensive Model and its Treatment Implicationshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/16506070701421313Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders: A meta-analysishttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S088761850700103XClinical predictors of treatment response towards exposure therapy in virtuo in spider phobia: A machine learning and external cross-validation approachhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618521000955?casa_token=AN81druxQHIAAAAA:VY663swtPLeauH7bNGZ9ScFkRDNtiSKSHlk4bWHmDyuW8qiQx9PTP_m9Lis9QeDyu9x7t7CnPNcConsiderations and practical protocols for using virtual reality in psychological research and practice, as evidenced through exposure-based therapyhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-021-01543-3Naruhodo #174 - Porque temos o impeto de pular de lugares altos?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-174-por-que-temos-o-impeto-de-pular-de-lugares-altos/Naruhodo #112 - Porque as pesosas tem medo de aviãohttps://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-112-por-que-as-pessoas-tem-medo-de-aviao/Naruhodo #229 - Medo aumenta a produtividade no trabalho?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-229-o-medo-aumenta-a-produtividade-no-trabalho/Naruhodo #251 - O que é a síndrome do impostor?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-251-o-que-e-a-sindrome-do-impostor/Naruhodo #294 - Porque apartamos Brigas entre Animais?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-294-por-que-apartamos-brigas-entre-animais/Naruhodo #194 - Uma pessoa pode ser enterrada viva nos dias de hoje?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-194-uma-pessoa-pode-ser-enterrada-viva-nos-dias-de-hoje/Podcasts das #Minas: ENTRELAÇADAShttps://www.instagram.com/podcastentrelacadas/#MulheresPodcasters*APOIE O NARUHODO!Você sabia que pode ajudar a manter o Naruhodo no ar?Ao contribuir, você pode ter acesso ao grupo fechado no Telegram, receber conteúdos exclusivos e ter vantagens especiais.Assine o apoio mensal pelo PicPay: https://picpay.me/naruhodopodcast

O que é medo?Como funcionam os mecanismos que nos fazem sentir medo?Quais as quatro causas aristotélicas para o medo?Confira a parte 1, de duas partes, no papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Participação Especial: Dra. Ana Arantes (@AninhaArantes)Psicóloga com Mestrado em Educação Especial e Doutorado em Psicologia (Comportamento e Cognição) pela UFSCAR. Atuou como docente e pesquisadora associada no Departamento de Psicologia da UFSCar de 2013 a 2019. Atualmente é Sócia Diretora da Realize Consultoria, Supervisão e Treinamento em ABA, atuando como consultora para diversos prestadores de serviços em ABA para crianças autistas em diversos estados do Brasil. Também participante do time de ciências do Nerdcast e do podcast Cafezinho & Comportamento, que fala sobre os fenômenos comportamentais no dia-a-dia . Além disso, é membra fundadora do Coletivo Feminista Marias & Amélias de Mulheres Analistas do Comportamento e líder do Grupo de Pesquisas sobre Análise Comportamental das Práticas Culturais de Opressão de Gênero e Raça, desenvolvendo pesquisa teórico-conceitual nas interfaces entre o Behaviorismo Radical e o Feminismo Radical e atua em ações de fomento à participação e representatividade feminina na área.Participação Especial: Cesar Coelho (@coelho_cao)Biólogo pela UNESP Botucatu, PhD em ciências pelo departamento de Psicobiologia UNIFESP e Pós-doutorando no Instituto de pesquisa do Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canadá.> OUÇA (48min 54s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAA Alura tem mais de 1.000 cursos de diversas áreas e é a maior plataforma de cursos online do Brasil -- e você tem acesso a todos com uma única assinatura.Aproveite o desconto de R$100 para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://www.alura.com.br/promocao/naruhodo*REFERÊNCIASTHE ORGANIZATION OF AGGRESSION AND FEAR IN VERTEBRATEShttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-7572-6_7.pdfDifferences in Fear of Isolation as an explanation of Cultural Differences: Evidence from memory and reasoninghttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103105000752?via%3DihubFear of Victimization: A Look at the Proximate Causeshttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2578277?origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contentsHuman brain evolution and the “Neuroevolutionary Time-depth Principle:”Implications for the Reclassification of fear-circuitry-related traits in DSM-Vand for studying resilience to warzone-related posttraumatic stress disorderhttp://cogprints.org/5013/1/2006_P.N.P._Neuro-evolution_of_fear_circuit_disorders.pdfSpecific phobiashttps://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lanpsy/PIIS2215-0366(18)30169-X.pdfNeuroimaging in specific phobia disorder: a systematic review of the literaturehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22392396/The cross-national epidemiology of specific phobia in the World Mental Health Surveyshttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5674525/Fear of Darkness, the Full Moon and the Nocturnal Ecology of African Lionshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0022285Medos sociais dos brasileiroshttps://www.scielo.br/j/osoc/a/NjxYpZW7HWjT3gnfvmFqmnR/?lang=ptBehavioral Responses to a Repetitive Visual Threat Stimulus Express a Persistent State of Defensive Arousal in Drosophilahttps://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(15)00411-XThreat induces cardiac and metabolic changes that negatively impact survival in flieshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221013671Tendency to inspect predators predicts mortality risk in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article-abstract/3/2/124/218010AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN CHILDREN'S FEARShttps://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00375.xChildren's nighttime fears: parent–child ratings of frequency, content, origins, coping behaviors and severityhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0005796799001552Contributions of the Amygdala to Emotion Processing: From Animal Models to Human Behaviorhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627305008238Judgments of Risk Frequencies: Tests of Possible Cognitive Mechanisms.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-08130-003Common childhood fears and their originshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0005796797000508A meta-analysis of instructed fear studies: Implications for conscious appraisal of threathttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053811909010192Contextual modulation of conditioned responses in humans: A review on virtual reality studieshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735821001380Intolerance of uncertainty is associated with heightened responding in the prefrontal cortex during cue-signalled uncertainty of threathttps://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13415-021-00932-7Virtual reality exposure therapy for Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-18714-007Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618516300469Cognitive Factors that Maintain Social Anxiety Disorder: a Comprehensive Model and its Treatment Implicationshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/16506070701421313Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders: A meta-analysishttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S088761850700103XClinical predictors of treatment response towards exposure therapy in virtuo in spider phobia: A machine learning and external cross-validation approachhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618521000955?casa_token=AN81druxQHIAAAAA:VY663swtPLeauH7bNGZ9ScFkRDNtiSKSHlk4bWHmDyuW8qiQx9PTP_m9Lis9QeDyu9x7t7CnPNcConsiderations and practical protocols for using virtual reality in psychological research and practice, as evidenced through exposure-based therapyhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-021-01543-3Naruhodo #174 - Porque temos o impeto de pular de lugares altos?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-174-por-que-temos-o-impeto-de-pular-de-lugares-altos/Naruhodo #112 - Porque as pesosas tem medo de aviãohttps://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-112-por-que-as-pessoas-tem-medo-de-aviao/Naruhodo #229 - Medo aumenta a produtividade no trabalho?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-229-o-medo-aumenta-a-produtividade-no-trabalho/Naruhodo #251 - O que é a síndrome do impostor?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-251-o-que-e-a-sindrome-do-impostor/Naruhodo #294 - Porque apartamos Brigas entre Animais?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-294-por-que-apartamos-brigas-entre-animais/Naruhodo #194 - Uma pessoa pode ser enterrada viva nos dias de hoje?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-194-uma-pessoa-pode-ser-enterrada-viva-nos-dias-de-hoje/Podcasts das #Minas: GEEKATShttps://geekats.com.br/#MulheresPodcasters*APOIE O NARUHODO!Você sabia que pode ajudar a manter o Naruhodo no ar?Ao contribuir, você pode ter acesso ao grupo fechado no Telegram, receber conteúdos exclusivos e ter vantagens especiais.Assine o apoio mensal pelo PicPay: https://picpay.me/naruhodopodcast

This is part 2 of a series on Diabetic Glucose Spikes Seen in "Healthy Adults". This video reviews PLOS Biology. Micheal Snyder, head of the genetics department at Stanford, and Heather Hall, a graduate student. They used Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM). 15% of otherwise "healthy" adults had prediabetes. 2% met the criteria for full-blown diabetes. Age and BMI were major drivers of high variability patterns. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.2005143 https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/900134

This episode, Kate and Matt are joined by Elysa for a super serious scientific conversation about… butts. Specifically, we talk about the role butts play in a very important part of life: waste removal. Interestingly, not all creatures have butts that develop and function the same, nor do they deal with waste removal in the same ways. So, this episode, we go on a tour of anuses across the animal kingdom. We talk about humans, and how our anus develops and works. But(t) we also talk about animals with mouth-butts, creatures that can create jet-pack-style transportation with their butts, animals that breathe through their butts, and animals that weaponize their behinds. We talk about transient anuses, animals with disposable butts, and creatures that just don't have butts at all! We also discuss the very important question… what kind of waste-disposal system would cat-dog have? We also tackle a listener question about itching… why do we scratch when we feel an itch? If you enjoyed Elysa's contribution to the episode and want to find more of them, you can follow them on twitter @asciencequeer. And, as always, you can find us @curiosityrat on twitter, instagram, and facebook, and send your listener questions in to curiosityrat@gmail.com We also now have a Patreon! If you love our content and want to support us you can jump on to https://www.patreon.com/curiosityrat and become a patron. There is absolutely ZERO pressure but if you have as little as $1/month you can chuck it our way to help us out and show you appreciate all the time and effort that goes into making this show. Main References: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ivb.12236 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24694282/ https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/05/evolution-butts/618915/ https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-3190/aac25a https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330795949_Prey_capturing_and_feeding_apparatus_of_dragonfly_nymph https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0116639 https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/how-the-scorpion-lost-its-tail-and-its-anus https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00227-004-1467-7 https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/how-this-fish-survives-in-a-sea-cucumbers-bum https://ocean.si.edu/ocean-life/fish/pearlfish-sea-cucumber https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18392795/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-012-0975-4 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jez.1055 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004452311500011X https://www.newscientist.com/article/2195656-animal-with-an-anus-that-comes-and-goes-could-reveal-how-ours-evolved/ https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Porifera/ https://ocean.si.edu/ocean-life/invertebrates/jellyfish-and-comb-jellies https://www.science.org/news/2016/03/why-watching-comb-jellies-poop-has-stunned-evolutionary-biologists Listener Q References: https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/what-makes-us-scratch-itch-scientists-finally-have-answer https://www.science.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aac8653 https://www.sciencealert.com/some-disorders-make-you-itch-uncontrollably-so-much-so-that-one-woman-scratched-through-to-her-brain https://www.webmd.com/skin-problems-and-treatments/guide/scratching-feels-good https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/what-makes-us-scratch-itch-scientists-finally-have-answer

Johnathan Ramirez from Thriving Earth Farm comes back with us tonight to talk about the effects of vaccines in poultry. The connection between them and what we are seeing now could be there and questions should be asked! Apologies for the abrupt ending on this one guys an emergency came up at the end. Johnathan's Website: thrivingearthfarm.com   Waking the Future Telegram Public Group: https://t.me/joinchat/uNi-dMIwsZlmMGEx   Waking the Future Telegram Channel (Updates): https://t.me/wakingthefuture   SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/waking-the-future   Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/WakingtheFuture?fan_landing=true   BuyMeACoffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/WakingtheFuture   Contact us: wakingthefuture@protonmail.com   Flote: https://flote.app/user/WakingtheFuture   Odysee: https://odysee.com/@wakingthefuture:0   Brand New Tube: https://brandnewtube.com/@WakingtheFuture   Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/qL8XNwXppAZW/   Rumble: https://rumble.com/register/WakingTheFuture1/   Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/wakingthefuture1   Podbean Audio Only: https://wakingthefuture.podbean.com/   Article Links: https://www.healthline.com/health-news/leaky-vaccines-can-produce-stronger-versions-of-viruses-072715?fbclid=IwAR1lAIStuI9zZWCH2NOJkITX_1MD3lhuwznRzrZmXaidWmxPp3jzFBO_UG8   https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/tthis-chicken-vaccine-makes-virus-dangerous?fbclid=IwAR3FFpeotVxT2bWE3xt-HV1EKZBd-td2x7top17EU-n8MEfn_AHXFYEVy0I   https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/leaky-vaccines-enhance-spread-of-deadlier-chicken-viruses   https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1002198&fbclid=IwAR3vJFk2SUreU7ZtYUzehZMX1ZK_uQqtENJkRkxsSgZUaeQVphI4uD4n_48   https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-ceo-albert-bourla-variant-specific-covid-vaccine/?fbclid=IwAR0HYnpSXX2N1nk4bSqGl8vcB6AgOdjZvY2wgcJfkTJuZqxapHJCJ7DlN_0   Thumbnail Link: https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/newshour/app/uploads/2015/07/Chicken-Cancer_NYT-Feb-30-1970.jpg  

Dr. Bradley Campbell is a holistic physician based out of Chicago. On this TWO PART episode, we dive into all things COVID-19.  From the outbreak to PCR testing, the governments lack of focus on healthy lifestyle, the Delta Variant, censorship, children and COVID and so much more.  Check out Dr. Bradley Campbell: https://www.drbradleycampbell.com https://www.instagram.com/dr.bradleycampbell/ www.healthassurancemovement.org Download for a FREE 1200 research articles book, 995 pages, on all vaccines by Dr. Alan Palmar and a 95 page Covid book on my website www.healthassurancemovement.org under injection resources  PCR test recall Lumping in flu with COVID https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html Ivermectin - suppression of this viable treatment  https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/08000/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx Immune post covid https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/ See Dark Horse Podcast on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi5N_uAqApEUIlg32QzkPlg Delta variant - more transmissible but less virulent. Lowest amount of deaths since 2020 (link to graph in show notes) Variant emerged after we started vaccinating  https://reason.com/2021/08/12/cdc-took-mistaken-data-on-delta-variant-transmissibility-from-a-new-york-times-infographic/ Dying WITH COVID vs FROM - a lot of death certificates say Covid when they weren't   https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2020/04/25/coronavirus-death-toll-hard-track-1-3-death-certificates-wrong/3020778001/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/debunking-the-false-claim-that-covid-death-counts-are-inflated1/ https://www.denverpost.com/2020/05/15/colorado-covid-coronavirus-counting-deaths-fatalities/ How many kids have been affected vs how many kids there are in the US. it's not a concern for them WHO warning of myocarditis in young men https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf The above article shows the lipid nanoparticles lodging in bone marrow, spleen, ovaries The vaccinated carry the same viral load as unvaccinated  https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387v1 https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/07/30/1022867219/cdc-study-provincetown-delta-vaccinated-breakthrough-mask-guidance Real life reactions  https://openvaers.com/covid-data Possible autoimmune disorders down the line post v Connecting the dots with autoimmune flare ups post v https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019233/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33515320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264276/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33429060/ Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1002198&fbclid=IwAR2GxMCUFvMWjE2DpK8NCsbo0lMhcoZQcOwSfBXjceZpsmgNHyaveiZFvBQ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-0358-3 https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/leaky-vaccines-enhance-spread-of-deadlier-chicken-viruses

Dr. Bradley Campbell is a holistic physician based out of Chicago. On this TWO PART episode, we dive into all things COVID-19.  From the outbreak to PCR testing, the governments lack of focus on healthy lifestyle, the Delta Variant, censorship, children and COVID and so much more.  Check out Dr. Bradley Campbell: https://www.drbradleycampbell.com https://www.instagram.com/dr.bradleycampbell/ www.healthassurancemovement.org Download for a FREE 1200 research articles book, 995 pages, on all vaccines by Dr. Alan Palmar and a 95 page Covid book on my website www.healthassurancemovement.org under injection resources  PCR test recall Lumping in flu with COVID https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html Ivermectin - suppression of this viable treatment  https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/08000/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx Immune post covid https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/ See Dark Horse Podcast on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi5N_uAqApEUIlg32QzkPlg Delta variant - more transmissible but less virulent. Lowest amount of deaths since 2020 (link to graph in show notes) Variant emerged after we started vaccinating  https://reason.com/2021/08/12/cdc-took-mistaken-data-on-delta-variant-transmissibility-from-a-new-york-times-infographic/ Dying WITH COVID vs FROM - a lot of death certificates say Covid when they weren't   https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2020/04/25/coronavirus-death-toll-hard-track-1-3-death-certificates-wrong/3020778001/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/debunking-the-false-claim-that-covid-death-counts-are-inflated1/ https://www.denverpost.com/2020/05/15/colorado-covid-coronavirus-counting-deaths-fatalities/ How many kids have been affected vs how many kids there are in the US. it's not a concern for them WHO warning of myocarditis in young men https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf The above article shows the lipid nanoparticles lodging in bone marrow, spleen, ovaries The vaccinated carry the same viral load as unvaccinated  https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387v1 https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/07/30/1022867219/cdc-study-provincetown-delta-vaccinated-breakthrough-mask-guidance Real life reactions  https://openvaers.com/covid-data Possible autoimmune disorders down the line post v Connecting the dots with autoimmune flare ups post v https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019233/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33515320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8264276/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33429060/ Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1002198&fbclid=IwAR2GxMCUFvMWjE2DpK8NCsbo0lMhcoZQcOwSfBXjceZpsmgNHyaveiZFvBQ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-0358-3 https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/leaky-vaccines-enhance-spread-of-deadlier-chicken-viruses

[While Bob & Cheryl Enyart go fishing we invite you to enjoy from the RSR archives our favorite List of Not So Old Things! Photos from today, June 25, 2021.] -- Finches Diversify in Decades, Opals Form in Months,  Man's Genetic Diversity in 200 Generations, C-14 Everywhere: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams present their classic program that led to the audience-favorites rsr.org/list-shows! See below and hear on today's radio program our list of Not So Old and Not So Slow Things! From opals forming in months to man's genetic diversity in 200 generations, and with carbon 14 everywhere it's not supposed to be (including in diamonds and dinosaur bones!), scientific observations fill the guys' most traditional list challenging those who claim that the earth is billions of years old. Many of these scientific finds demand a re-evaluation of supposed million and billion-year ages. * Finches Adapt in 17 Years, Not 2.3 Million: Charles Darwin's finches are claimed to have taken 2,300,000 years to diversify from an initial species blown onto the Galapagos Islands. Yet individuals from a single finch species on a U.S. Bird Reservation in the Pacific were introduced to a group of small islands 300 miles away and in at most 17 years, like Darwin's finches, they had diversified their beaks, related muscles, and behavior to fill various ecological niches. Hear about this also at rsr.org/spetner. * Opals Can Form in "A Few Months" And Don't Need 100,000 Years: A leading authority on opals, Allan W. Eckert, observed that, "scientific papers and textbooks have told that the process of opal formation requires tens of thousands of years, perhaps hundreds of thousands... Not true." A 2011 peer-reviewed paper in a geology journal from Australia, where almost all the world's opal is found, reported on the: "new timetable for opal formation involving weeks to a few months and not the hundreds of thousands of years envisaged by the conventional weathering model." (And apparently, per a 2019 report from Entomology Today, opals can even form around insects!) More knowledgeable scientists resist the uncritical, group-think insistence on false super-slow formation rates (as also for manganese nodules, gold veins, stone, petroleum, canyons and gullies, and even guts, all below). Regarding opals, Darwinian bias led geologists to long ignore possible quick action, as from microbes, as a possible explanation for these mineraloids. For both in nature and in the lab, opals form rapidly, not even in 10,000 years, but in weeks. See this also from creationists by a geologist, a paleobiochemist, and a nuclear chemist. * Finches Speciate in Two Generations vs Two Million Years for Darwin's Birds?  Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands are said to have diversified into 14 species over a period of two million years. But in 2017 the journal Science reported a newcomer to the Island which within two generations spawned a reproductively isolated new species. In another instance as documented by Lee Spetner, a hundred birds of the same finch species introduced to an island cluster a 1,000 kilometers from Galapagos diversified into species with the typical variations in beak sizes, etc. "If this diversification occurred in less than seventeen years," Dr. Spetner asks, "why did Darwin's Galapagos finches [as claimed by evolutionists] have to take two million years?" * Blue Eyes Originated Not So Long Ago: Not a million years ago, nor a hundred thousand years ago, but based on a peer-reviewed paper in Human Genetics, a press release at Science Daily reports that, "research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. A team at the University of Copenhagen have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye colour of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today." * Adding the Entire Universe to our List of Not So Old Things? Based on March 2019 findings from Hubble, Nobel laureate Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute and his co-authors in the Astrophysical Journal estimate that the universe is about a billion years younger than previously thought! Then in September 2019 in the journal Science, the age dropped precipitiously to as low as 11.4 billion years! Of course, these measurements also further squeeze the canonical story of the big bang chronology with its many already existing problems including the insufficient time to "evolve" distant mature galaxies, galaxy clusters, superclusters, enormous black holes, filaments, bubbles, walls, and other superstructures. So, even though the latest estimates are still absurdly too old (Google: big bang predictions, and click on the #1 ranked article, or just go on over there to rsr.org/bb), regardless, we thought we'd plop the whole universe down on our List of Not So Old Things!   * After the Soft Tissue Discoveries, NOW Dino DNA: When a North Carolina State University paleontologist took the Tyrannosaurus Rex photos to the right of original biological material, that led to the 2016 discovery of dinosaur DNA, So far researchers have also recovered dinosaur blood vessels, collagen, osteocytes, hemoglobin, red blood cells, and various proteins. As of May 2018, twenty-six scientific journals, including Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, Bone, and Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, have confirmed the discovery of biomaterial fossils from many dinosaurs! Organisms including T. Rex, hadrosaur, titanosaur, triceratops, Lufengosaur, mosasaur, and Archaeopteryx, and many others dated, allegedly, even hundreds of millions of years old, have yielded their endogenous, still-soft biological material. See the web's most complete listing of 100+ journal papers (screenshot, left) announcing these discoveries at bflist.rsr.org and see it in layman's terms at rsr.org/soft. * Rapid Stalactites, Stalagmites, Etc.: A construction worker in 1954 left a lemonade bottle in one of Australia's famous Jenolan Caves. By 2011 it had been naturally transformed into a stalagmite (below, right). Increasing scientific knowledge is arguing for rapid cave formation (see below, Nat'l Park Service shrinks Carlsbad Caverns formation estimates from 260M years, to 10M, to 2M, to it "depends"). Likewise, examples are growing of rapid formations with typical chemical make-up (see bottle, left) of classic stalactites and stalagmites including:- in Nat'l Geo the Carlsbad Caverns stalagmite that rapidly covered a bat - the tunnel stalagmites at Tennessee's Raccoon Mountain - hundreds of stalactites beneath the Lincoln Memorial - those near Gladfelter Hall at Philadelphia's Temple University (send photos to Bob@rsr.org) - hundreds of stalactites at Australia's zinc mine at Mt. Isa.   - and those beneath Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance. * Most Human Mutations Arose in 200 Generations: From Adam until Real Science Radio, in only 200 generations! The journal Nature reports The Recent Origin of Most Human Protein-coding Variants. As summarized by geneticist co-author Joshua Akey, "Most of the mutations that we found arose in the last 200 generations or so" (the same number previously published by biblical creationists). Another 2012 paper, in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology (Eugenie Scott's own field) on High mitochondrial mutation rates, shows that one mitochondrial DNA mutation occurs every other generation, which, as creationists point out, indicates that mtEve would have lived about 200 generations ago. That's not so old! * National Geographic's Not-So-Old Hard-Rock Canyon at Mount St. Helens: As our List of Not So Old Things (this web page) reveals, by a kneejerk reaction evolutionary scientists assign ages of tens or hundreds of thousands of years (or at least just long enough to contradict Moses' chronology in Genesis.) However, with closer study, routinely, more and more old ages get revised downward to fit the world's growing scientific knowledge. So the trend is not that more information lengthens ages, but rather, as data replaces guesswork, ages tend to shrink until they are consistent with the young-earth biblical timeframe. Consistent with this observation, the May 2000 issue of National Geographic quotes the U.S. Forest Service's scientist at Mount St. Helens, Peter Frenzen, describing the canyon on the north side of the volcano. "You'd expect a hard-rock canyon to be thousands, even hundreds of thousands of years old. But this was cut in less than a decade." And as for the volcano itself, while again, the kneejerk reaction of old-earthers would be to claim that most geologic features are hundreds of thousands or millions of years old, the atheistic National Geographic magazine acknowledges from the evidence that Mount St. Helens, the volcanic mount, is only about 4,000 years old! See below and more at rsr.org/mount-st-helens. * Mount St. Helens Dome Ten Years Old not 1.7 Million: Geochron Laboratories of Cambridge, Mass., using potassium-argon and other radiometric techniques claims the rock sample they dated, from the volcano's dome, solidified somewhere between 340,000 and 2.8 million years ago. However photographic evidence and historical reports document the dome's formation during the 1980s, just ten years prior to the samples being collected. With the age of this rock known, radiometric dating therefore gets the age 99.99999% wrong. * Devils Hole Pupfish Isolated Not for 13,000 Years But for 100: Secular scientists default to knee-jerk, older-than-Bible-age dates. However, a tiny Mojave desert fish is having none of it. Rather than having been genetically isolated from other fish for 13,000 years (which would make this small school of fish older than the Earth itself), according to a paper in the journal Nature, actual measurements of mutation rates indicate that the genetic diversity of these Pupfish could have been generated in about 100 years, give or take a few. * Polystrates like Spines and Rare Schools of Fossilized Jellyfish: Previously, seven sedimentary layers in Wisconsin had been described as taking a million years to form. And because jellyfish have no skeleton, as Charles Darwin pointed out, it is rare to find them among fossils. But now, reported in the journal Geology, a school of jellyfish fossils have been found throughout those same seven layers. So, polystrate fossils that condense the time of strata deposition from eons to hours or months, include: - Jellyfish in central Wisconsin were not deposited and fossilized over a million years but during a single event quick enough to trap a whole school. (This fossil school, therefore, taken as a unit forms a polystrate fossil.) Examples are everywhere that falsify the claims of strata deposition over millions of years. - Countless trilobites buried in astounding three dimensionality around the world are meticulously recovered from limestone, much of which is claimed to have been deposited very slowly. Contrariwise, because these specimens were buried rapidly in quickly laid down sediments, they show no evidence of greater erosion on their upper parts as compared to their lower parts.- The delicacy of radiating spine polystrates, like tadpole and jellyfish fossils, especially clearly demonstrate the rapidity of such strata deposition. - A second school of jellyfish, even though they rarely fossilized, exists in another locale with jellyfish fossils in multiple layers, in Australia's Brockman Iron Formation, constraining there too the rate of strata deposition. By the way, jellyfish are an example of evolution's big squeeze. Like galaxies evolving too quickly, galaxy clusters, and even human feet (which, like Mummy DNA, challenge the Out of Africa paradigm), jellyfish have gotten into the act squeezing evolution's timeline, here by 200 million years when they were found in strata allegedly a half-a-billion years old. Other examples, ironically referred to as Medusoid Problematica, are even found in pre-Cambrian strata. - 171 tadpoles of the same species buried in diatoms. - Leaves buried vertically through single-celled diatoms powerfully refute the claimed super-slow deposition of diatomaceous rock. - Many fossils, including a Mesosaur, have been buried in multiple "varve" layers, which are claimed to be annual depositions, yet they show no erosional patterns that would indicate gradual burial (as they claim, absurdly, over even thousands of years). - A single whale skeleton preserved in California in dozens of layers of diatom deposits thus forming a polystrate fossil. - 40 whales buried in the desert in Chile. "What's really interesting is that this didn't just happen once," said Smithsonian evolutionist Dr. Nick Pyenson. It happened four times." Why's that? Because "the fossil site has at least four layers", to which Real Science Radio's Bob Enyart replies: "Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha", with RSR co-host Fred Williams thoughtfully adding, "Ha ha!" * Polystrate Trees: Examples abound around the world of polystrate trees:  - Yellowstone's petrified polystrate forest (with the NPS exhibit sign removed; see below) with successive layers of rootless trees demonstrating the rapid deposition of fifty layers of strata. - A similarly formed polystrate fossil forest in France demonstrating the rapid deposition of a dozen strata. - In a thousand locations including famously the Fossil Cliffs of Joggins, Nova Scotia, polystrate fossils such as trees span many strata. - These trees lack erosion: Not only should such fossils, generally speaking, not even exist, but polystrates including trees typically show no evidence of erosion increasing with height. All of this powerfully disproves the claim that the layers were deposited slowly over thousands or millions of years. In the experience of your RSR radio hosts, evolutionists commonly respond to this hard evidence with mocking. See CRSQ June 2006, ICR Impact #316, and RSR 8-11-06 at KGOV.com. * Yellowstone Petrified Trees Sign Removed: The National Park Service removed their incorrect sign (see left and more). The NPS had claimed that in dozens of different strata over a 40-square mile area, many petrified trees were still standing where they had grown. The NPS eventually removed the sign partly because those petrified trees had no root systems, which they would have had if they had grown there. Instead, the trees of this "fossil forest" have roots that are abruptly broken off two or three feet from their trunks. If these mature trees actually had been remnants of sequential forests that had grown up in strata layer on top of strata layer, 27 times on Specimen Ridge (and 50 times at Specimen Creek), such a natural history implies passage of more time than permitted by biblical chronology. So, don't trust the National Park Service on historical science because they're wrong on the age of the Earth. * Wood Petrifies Quickly: Not surprisingly, by the common evolutionary knee-jerk claim of deep time, "several researchers believe that several millions of years are necessary for the complete formation of silicified wood". Our List of Not So Old and Not So Slow Things includes the work of five Japanese scientists who proved creationist research and published their results in the peer-reviewed journal Sedimentary Geology showing that wood can and does petrify rapidly. Modern wood significantly petrified in 36 years these researchers concluded that wood buried in strata could have been petrified in "a fairly short period of time, in the order of several tens to hundreds of years." * The Scablands: The primary surface features of the Scablands, which cover thousands of square miles of eastern Washington, were long believed to have formed gradually. Yet, against the determined claims of uniformitarian geologists, there is now overwhelming evidence as presented even in a NOVA TV program that the primary features of the Scablands formed rapidly from a catastrophic breach of Lake Missoula causing a massive regional flood. Of course evolutionary geologists still argue that the landscape was formed over tens of thousands of years, now by claiming there must have been a hundred Missoula floods. However, the evidence that there was Only One Lake Missoula Flood has been powerfully reinforced by a University of Colorado Ph.D. thesis. So the Scablands itself is no longer available to old-earthers as de facto evidence for the passage of millions of years. * The Heart Mountain Detachment: in Wyoming just east of Yellowstone, this mountain did not break apart slowly by uniformitarian processes but in only about half-an-hour as widely reported including in the evolutionist LiveScience.com, "Land Speed Record: Mountain Moves 62 Miles in 30 Minutes." The evidence indicates that this mountain of rock covering 425 square miles rapidly broke into 50 pieces and slid apart over an area of more than 1,300 square miles in a biblical, not a "geological," timeframe.  * "150 Million" year-old Squid Ink Not Decomposed: This still-writable ink had dehydrated but had not decomposed! The British Geological Survey's Dr. Phil Wilby, who excavated the fossil, said, "It is difficult to imagine how you can have something as soft and sloppy as an ink sac fossilised in three dimensions, still black, and inside a rock that is 150 million years old." And the Daily Mail states that, "the black ink was of exactly the same structure as that of today's version", just desiccated. And Wilby added, "Normally you would find only the hard parts like the shell and bones fossilised but... these creatures... can be dissected as if they are living animals, you can see the muscle fibres and cells. It is difficult to imagine... The structure is similar to ink from a modern squid so we can write with it..." Why is this difficult for evolutionists to imagine? Because as Dr. Carl Wieland writes, "Chemical structures 'fall apart' all by themselves over time due to the randomizing effects of molecular motion." Decades ago Bob Enyart broadcast a geology program about Mount St. Helens' catastrophic destruction of forests and the hydraulic transportation and upright deposition of trees. Later, Bob met the chief ranger from Haleakala National Park on Hawaii's island of Maui, Mark Tanaka-Sanders. The ranger agreed to correspond with his colleague at Yellowstone to urge him to have the sign removed. Thankfully, it was then removed. (See also AIG, CMI, and all the original Yellowstone exhibit photos.) Groundbreaking research conducted by creation geologist Dr. Steve Austin in Spirit Lake after Mount St. Helens eruption provided a modern-day analog to the formation of Yellowstone fossil forest. A steam blast from that volcano blew over tens of thousands of trees leaving them without attached roots. Many thousands of those trees were floating upright in Spirit Lake, and began sinking at varying rates into rapidly and sporadically deposited sediments. Once Yellowstone's successive forest interpretation was falsified (though like with junk DNA, it's too big to fail, so many atheists and others still cling to it), the erroneous sign was removed. * Asiatic vs. European Honeybees: These two populations of bees have been separated supposedly for seven million years. A researcher decided to put the two together to see what would happen. What we should have here is a failure to communicate that would have resulted after their "language" evolved over millions of years. However, European and Asiatic honeybees are still able to communicate, putting into doubt the evolutionary claim that they were separated over "geologic periods." For more, see the Public Library of Science, Asiatic Honeybees Can Understand Dance Language of European Honeybees. (Oh yeah, and why don't fossils of poorly-formed honeycombs exist, from the millions of years before the bees and natural selection finally got the design right? Ha! Because they don't exist! :) Nautiloid proves rapid limestone formation. * Remember the Nautiloids: In the Grand Canyon there is a limestone layer averaging seven feet thick that runs the 277 miles of the canyon (and beyond) that covers hundreds of square miles and contains an average of one nautiloid fossil per square meter. Along with many other dead creatures in this one particular layer, 15% of these nautiloids were killed and then fossilized standing on their heads. Yes, vertically. They were caught in such an intense and rapid catastrophic flow that gravity was not able to cause all of their dead carcasses to fall over on their sides. Famed Mount St. Helens geologist Steve Austin is also the world's leading expert on nautiloid fossils and has worked in the canyon and presented his findings to the park's rangers at the invitation of National Park Service officials. Austin points out, as is true of many of the world's mass fossil graveyards, that this enormous nautiloid deposition provides indisputable proof of the extremely rapid formation of a significant layer of limestone near the bottom of the canyon, a layer like the others we've been told about, that allegedly formed at the bottom of a calm and placid sea with slow and gradual sedimentation. But a million nautiloids, standing on their heads, literally, would beg to differ. At our sister stie, RSR provides the relevant Geologic Society of America abstract, links, and video. *  Now It's Allegedly Two Million Year-Old Leaves: "When we started pulling leaves out of the soil, that was surreal, to know that it's millions of years old..." sur-re-al: adjective: a bizarre mix of fact and fantasy. In this case, the leaves are the facts. Earth scientists from Ohio State and the University of Minnesota say that wood and leaves they found in the Canadian Arctic are at least two million years old, and perhaps more than ten million years old, even though the leaves are just dry and crumbly and the wood still burns! * Gold Precipitates in Veins in Less than a Second: After geologists submitted for decades to the assumption that each layer of gold would deposit at the alleged super slow rates of geologic process, the journal Nature Geoscience reports that each layer of deposition can occur within a few tenths of a second. Meanwhile, at the Lihir gold deposit in Papua New Guinea, evolutionists assumed the more than 20 million ounces of gold in the Lihir reserve took millions of years to deposit, but as reported in the journal Science, geologists can now demonstrate that the deposit could have formed in thousands of years, or far more quickly! Iceland's not-so-old Surtsey Island looks ancient. * Surtsey Island, Iceland: Of the volcanic island that formed in 1963, New Scientist reported in 2007 about Surtsey that "geographers... marvel that canyons, gullies and other land features that typically take tens of thousands or millions of years to form were created in less than a decade." Yes. And Sigurdur Thorarinsson, Iceland's chief  geologist, wrote in the months after Surtsey formed, "that the time scale," he had been trained "to attach to geological developments is misleading." [For what is said to] take thousands of years... the same development may take a few weeks or even days here [including to form] a landscape... so varied and mature that it was almost beyond belief... wide sandy beaches and precipitous crags... gravel banks and lagoons, impressive cliffs… hollows, glens and soft undulating land... fractures and faultscarps, channels and screes… confounded by what met your eye... boulders worn by the surf, some of which were almost round... -Iceland's chief geologist * The Palouse River Gorge: In the southeast of Washington State, the Palouse River Gorge is one of many features formed rapidly by 500 cubic miles of water catastrophically released with the breaching of a natural dam in the Lake Missoula Flood (which gouged out the Scablands as described above). So, hard rock can be breached and eroded rapidly. * Leaf Shapes Identical for 190 Million Years?  From Berkley.edu, "Ginkgo biloba... dates back to... about 190 million years ago... fossilized leaf material from the Tertiary species Ginkgo adiantoides is considered similar or even identical to that produced by modern Ginkgo biloba trees... virtually indistinguishable..." The literature describes leaf shapes as "spectacularly diverse" sometimes within a species but especially across the plant kingdom. Because all kinds of plants survive with all kinds of different leaf shapes, the conservation of a species retaining a single shape over alleged deep time is a telling issue. Darwin's theory is undermined by the unchanging shape over millions of years of a species' leaf shape. This lack of change, stasis in what should be an easily morphable plant trait, supports the broader conclusion that chimp-like creatures did not become human beings and all the other ambitious evolutionary creation of new kinds are simply imagined. (Ginkgo adiantoides and biloba are actually the same species. Wikipedia states, "It is doubtful whether the Northern Hemisphere fossil species of Ginkgo can be reliably distinguished." For oftentimes, as documented by Dr. Carl Werner in his Evolution: The Grand Experiment series, paleontogists falsely speciate identical specimens, giving different species names, even different genus names, to the fossil and living animals that appear identical.) * Box Canyon, Idaho: Geologists now think Box Canyon in Idaho, USA, was carved by a catastrophic flood and not slowly over millions of years with 1) huge plunge pools formed by waterfalls; 2) the almost complete removal of large basalt boulders from the canyon; 3) an eroded notch on the plateau at the top of the canyon; and 4) water scour marks on the basalt plateau leading to the canyon. Scientists calculate that the flood was so large that it could have eroded the whole canyon in as little as 35 days. See the journal Science, Formation of Box Canyon, Idaho, by Megaflood, and the Journal of Creation, and Creation Magazine. * Manganese Nodules Rapid Formation: Allegedly, as claimed at the Wikipedia entry from 2005 through 2021: "Nodule growth is one of the slowest of all geological phenomena – in the order of a centimeter over several million years." Wow, that would be slow! And a Texas A&M Marine Sciences technical slide presentation says, “They grow very slowly (mm/million years) and can be tens of millions of years old.” But according to a World Almanac documentary they have formed "around beer cans," said marine geologist Dr. John Yates in the 1997 video Universe Beneath the Sea: The Next Frontier. There are also reports of manganese nodules forming around ships sunk in the First World War. See more at at youngearth.com, at TOL, in the print edition of the Journal of Creation, and in this typical forum discussion with atheists (at the Chicago Cubs forum no less :). * "6,000 year-old" Mitochondrial Eve: As the Bible calls "Eve... the mother of all living" (Gen. 3:20), genetic researchers have named the one woman from whom all humans have descended "Mitochondrial Eve." But in a scientific attempt to date her existence, they openly admit that they included chimpanzee DNA in their analysis in order to get what they viewed as a reasonably old date of 200,000 years ago (which is still surprisingly recent from their perspective, but old enough not to strain Darwinian theory too much). But then as widely reported including by Science magazine, when they dropped the chimp data and used only actual human mutation rates, that process determined that Eve lived only six thousand years ago! In Ann Gibbon's Science article, "Calibrating the Mitochondrial Clock," rather than again using circular reasoning by assuming their conclusion (that humans evolved from ape-like creatures), they performed their calculations using actual measured mutation rates. This peer-reviewed journal then reported that if these rates have been constant, "mitochondrial Eve… would be a mere 6000 years old." See also the journal Nature and creation.com's "A shrinking date for Eve," and Walt Brown's assessment. Expectedly though, evolutionists have found a way to reject their own unbiased finding (the conclusion contrary to their self-interest) by returning to their original method of using circular reasoning, as reported in the American Journal of Human Genetics, "calibrating against recent evidence for the divergence time of humans and chimpanzees,"  to reset their mitochondrial clock back to 200,000 years. * Even Younger Y-Chromosomal Adam: (Although he should be called, "Y-Chromosomal Noah.") While we inherit our mtDNA only from our mothers, only men have a Y chromosome (which incidentally genetically disproves the cla

  [While Bob & Cheryl Enyart go fishing we invite you to enjoy from the RSR archives our favorite List of Not So Old Things! Photos from today, June 25, 2021.] -- Finches Diversify in Decades, Opals Form in Months,  Man's Genetic Diversity in 200 Generations, C-14 Everywhere: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams present their classic program that led to the audience-favorites rsr.org/list-shows! See below and hear on today's radio program our list of Not So Old and Not So Slow Things! From opals forming in months to man's genetic diversity in 200 generations, and with carbon 14 everywhere it's not supposed to be (including in diamonds and dinosaur bones!), scientific observations fill the guys' most traditional list challenging those who claim that the earth is billions of years old. Many of these scientific finds demand a re-evaluation of supposed million and billion-year ages. * Finches Adapt in 17 Years, Not 2.3 Million: Charles Darwin's finches are claimed to have taken 2,300,000 years to diversify from an initial species blown onto the Galapagos Islands. Yet individuals from a single finch species on a U.S. Bird Reservation in the Pacific were introduced to a group of small islands 300 miles away and in at most 17 years, like Darwin's finches, they had diversified their beaks, related muscles, and behavior to fill various ecological niches. Hear about this also at rsr.org/spetner. * Opals Can Form in "A Few Months" And Don't Need 100,000 Years: A leading authority on opals, Allan W. Eckert, observed that, "scientific papers and textbooks have told that the process of opal formation requires tens of thousands of years, perhaps hundreds of thousands... Not true." A 2011 peer-reviewed paper in a geology journal from Australia, where almost all the world's opal is found, reported on the: "new timetable for opal formation involving weeks to a few months and not the hundreds of thousands of years envisaged by the conventional weathering model." (And apparently, per a 2019 report from Entomology Today, opals can even form around insects!) More knowledgeable scientists resist the uncritical, group-think insistence on false super-slow formation rates (as also for manganese nodules, gold veins, stone, petroleum, canyons and gullies, and even guts, all below). Regarding opals, Darwinian bias led geologists to long ignore possible quick action, as from microbes, as a possible explanation for these mineraloids. For both in nature and in the lab, opals form rapidly, not even in 10,000 years, but in weeks. See this also from creationists by a geologist, a paleobiochemist, and a nuclear chemist. * Finches Speciate in Two Generations vs Two Million Years for Darwin's Birds?  Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands are said to have diversified into 14 species over a period of two million years. But in 2017 the journal Science reported a newcomer to the Island which within two generations spawned a reproductively isolated new species. In another instance as documented by Lee Spetner, a hundred birds of the same finch species introduced to an island cluster a 1,000 kilometers from Galapagos diversified into species with the typical variations in beak sizes, etc. "If this diversification occurred in less than seventeen years," Dr. Spetner asks, "why did Darwin's Galapagos finches [as claimed by evolutionists] have to take two million years?" * Blue Eyes Originated Not So Long Ago: Not a million years ago, nor a hundred thousand years ago, but based on a peer-reviewed paper in Human Genetics, a press release at Science Daily reports that, "research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. A team at the University of Copenhagen have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye colour of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today." * Adding the Entire Universe to our List of Not So Old Things? Based on March 2019 findings from Hubble, Nobel laureate Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute and his co-authors in the Astrophysical Journal estimate that the universe is about a billion years younger than previously thought! Then in September 2019 in the journal Science, the age dropped precipitiously to as low as 11.4 billion years! Of course, these measurements also further squeeze the canonical story of the big bang chronology with its many already existing problems including the insufficient time to "evolve" distant mature galaxies, galaxy clusters, superclusters, enormous black holes, filaments, bubbles, walls, and other superstructures. So, even though the latest estimates are still absurdly too old (Google: big bang predictions, and click on the #1 ranked article, or just go on over there to rsr.org/bb), regardless, we thought we'd plop the whole universe down on our List of Not So Old Things!   * After the Soft Tissue Discoveries, NOW Dino DNA: When a North Carolina State University paleontologist took the Tyrannosaurus Rex photos to the right of original biological material, that led to the 2016 discovery of dinosaur DNA, So far researchers have also recovered dinosaur blood vessels, collagen, osteocytes, hemoglobin, red blood cells, and various proteins. As of May 2018, twenty-six scientific journals, including Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, Bone, and Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, have confirmed the discovery of biomaterial fossils from many dinosaurs! Organisms including T. Rex, hadrosaur, titanosaur, triceratops, Lufengosaur, mosasaur, and Archaeopteryx, and many others dated, allegedly, even hundreds of millions of years old, have yielded their endogenous, still-soft biological material. See the web's most complete listing of 100+ journal papers (screenshot, left) announcing these discoveries at bflist.rsr.org and see it in layman's terms at rsr.org/soft. * Rapid Stalactites, Stalagmites, Etc.: A construction worker in 1954 left a lemonade bottle in one of Australia's famous Jenolan Caves. By 2011 it had been naturally transformed into a stalagmite (below, right). Increasing scientific knowledge is arguing for rapid cave formation (see below, Nat'l Park Service shrinks Carlsbad Caverns formation estimates from 260M years, to 10M, to 2M, to it "depends"). Likewise, examples are growing of rapid formations with typical chemical make-up (see bottle, left) of classic stalactites and stalagmites including:- in Nat'l Geo the Carlsbad Caverns stalagmite that rapidly covered a bat - the tunnel stalagmites at Tennessee's Raccoon Mountain - hundreds of stalactites beneath the Lincoln Memorial - those near Gladfelter Hall at Philadelphia's Temple University (send photos to Bob@rsr.org) - hundreds of stalactites at Australia's zinc mine at Mt. Isa.   - and those beneath Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance. * Most Human Mutations Arose in 200 Generations: From Adam until Real Science Radio, in only 200 generations! The journal Nature reports The Recent Origin of Most Human Protein-coding Variants. As summarized by geneticist co-author Joshua Akey, "Most of the mutations that we found arose in the last 200 generations or so" (the same number previously published by biblical creationists). Another 2012 paper, in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology (Eugenie Scott's own field) on High mitochondrial mutation rates, shows that one mitochondrial DNA mutation occurs every other generation, which, as creationists point out, indicates that mtEve would have lived about 200 generations ago. That's not so old! * National Geographic's Not-So-Old Hard-Rock Canyon at Mount St. Helens: As our List of Not So Old Things (this web page) reveals, by a kneejerk reaction evolutionary scientists assign ages of tens or hundreds of thousands of years (or at least just long enough to contradict Moses' chronology in Genesis.) However, with closer study, routinely, more and more old ages get revised downward to fit the world's growing scientific knowledge. So the trend is not that more information lengthens ages, but rather, as data replaces guesswork, ages tend to shrink until they are consistent with the young-earth biblical timeframe. Consistent with this observation, the May 2000 issue of National Geographic quotes the U.S. Forest Service's scientist at Mount St. Helens, Peter Frenzen, describing the canyon on the north side of the volcano. "You'd expect a hard-rock canyon to be thousands, even hundreds of thousands of years old. But this was cut in less than a decade." And as for the volcano itself, while again, the kneejerk reaction of old-earthers would be to claim that most geologic features are hundreds of thousands or millions of years old, the atheistic National Geographic magazine acknowledges from the evidence that Mount St. Helens, the volcanic mount, is only about 4,000 years old! See below and more at rsr.org/mount-st-helens. * Mount St. Helens Dome Ten Years Old not 1.7 Million: Geochron Laboratories of Cambridge, Mass., using potassium-argon and other radiometric techniques claims the rock sample they dated, from the volcano's dome, solidified somewhere between 340,000 and 2.8 million years ago. However photographic evidence and historical reports document the dome's formation during the 1980s, just ten years prior to the samples being collected. With the age of this rock known, radiometric dating therefore gets the age 99.99999% wrong. * Devils Hole Pupfish Isolated Not for 13,000 Years But for 100: Secular scientists default to knee-jerk, older-than-Bible-age dates. However, a tiny Mojave desert fish is having none of it. Rather than having been genetically isolated from other fish for 13,000 years (which would make this small school of fish older than the Earth itself), according to a paper in the journal Nature, actual measurements of mutation rates indicate that the genetic diversity of these Pupfish could have been generated in about 100 years, give or take a few. * Polystrates like Spines and Rare Schools of Fossilized Jellyfish: Previously, seven sedimentary layers in Wisconsin had been described as taking a million years to form. And because jellyfish have no skeleton, as Charles Darwin pointed out, it is rare to find them among fossils. But now, reported in the journal Geology, a school of jellyfish fossils have been found throughout those same seven layers. So, polystrate fossils that condense the time of strata deposition from eons to hours or months, include: - Jellyfish in central Wisconsin were not deposited and fossilized over a million years but during a single event quick enough to trap a whole school. (This fossil school, therefore, taken as a unit forms a polystrate fossil.) Examples are everywhere that falsify the claims of strata deposition over millions of years. - Countless trilobites buried in astounding three dimensionality around the world are meticulously recovered from limestone, much of which is claimed to have been deposited very slowly. Contrariwise, because these specimens were buried rapidly in quickly laid down sediments, they show no evidence of greater erosion on their upper parts as compared to their lower parts.- The delicacy of radiating spine polystrates, like tadpole and jellyfish fossils, especially clearly demonstrate the rapidity of such strata deposition. - A second school of jellyfish, even though they rarely fossilized, exists in another locale with jellyfish fossils in multiple layers, in Australia's Brockman Iron Formation, constraining there too the rate of strata deposition. By the way, jellyfish are an example of evolution's big squeeze. Like galaxies evolving too quickly, galaxy clusters, and even human feet (which, like Mummy DNA, challenge the Out of Africa paradigm), jellyfish have gotten into the act squeezing evolution's timeline, here by 200 million years when they were found in strata allegedly a half-a-billion years old. Other examples, ironically referred to as Medusoid Problematica, are even found in pre-Cambrian strata. - 171 tadpoles of the same species buried in diatoms. - Leaves buried vertically through single-celled diatoms powerfully refute the claimed super-slow deposition of diatomaceous rock. - Many fossils, including a Mesosaur, have been buried in multiple "varve" layers, which are claimed to be annual depositions, yet they show no erosional patterns that would indicate gradual burial (as they claim, absurdly, over even thousands of years). - A single whale skeleton preserved in California in dozens of layers of diatom deposits thus forming a polystrate fossil. - 40 whales buried in the desert in Chile. "What's really interesting is that this didn't just happen once," said Smithsonian evolutionist Dr. Nick Pyenson. It happened four times." Why's that? Because "the fossil site has at least four layers", to which Real Science Radio's Bob Enyart replies: "Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha", with RSR co-host Fred Williams thoughtfully adding, "Ha ha!" * Polystrate Trees: Examples abound around the world of polystrate trees:  - Yellowstone's petrified polystrate forest (with the NPS exhibit sign removed; see below) with successive layers of rootless trees demonstrating the rapid deposition of fifty layers of strata. - A similarly formed polystrate fossil forest in France demonstrating the rapid deposition of a dozen strata. - In a thousand locations including famously the Fossil Cliffs of Joggins, Nova Scotia, polystrate fossils such as trees span many strata. - These trees lack erosion: Not only should such fossils, generally speaking, not even exist, but polystrates including trees typically show no evidence of erosion increasing with height. All of this powerfully disproves the claim that the layers were deposited slowly over thousands or millions of years. In the experience of your RSR radio hosts, evolutionists commonly respond to this hard evidence with mocking. See CRSQ June 2006, ICR Impact #316, and RSR 8-11-06 at KGOV.com. * Yellowstone Petrified Trees Sign Removed: The National Park Service removed their incorrect sign (see left and more). The NPS had claimed that in dozens of different strata over a 40-square mile area, many petrified trees were still standing where they had grown. The NPS eventually removed the sign partly because those petrified trees had no root systems, which they would have had if they had grown there. Instead, the trees of this "fossil forest" have roots that are abruptly broken off two or three feet from their trunks. If these mature trees actually had been remnants of sequential forests that had grown up in strata layer on top of strata layer, 27 times on Specimen Ridge (and 50 times at Specimen Creek), such a natural history implies passage of more time than permitted by biblical chronology. So, don't trust the National Park Service on historical science because they're wrong on the age of the Earth. * Wood Petrifies Quickly: Not surprisingly, by the common evolutionary knee-jerk claim of deep time, "several researchers believe that several millions of years are necessary for the complete formation of silicified wood". Our List of Not So Old and Not So Slow Things includes the work of five Japanese scientists who proved creationist research and published their results in the peer-reviewed journal Sedimentary Geology showing that wood can and does petrify rapidly. Modern wood significantly petrified in 36 years these researchers concluded that wood buried in strata could have been petrified in "a fairly short period of time, in the order of several tens to hundreds of years." * The Scablands: The primary surface features of the Scablands, which cover thousands of square miles of eastern Washington, were long believed to have formed gradually. Yet, against the determined claims of uniformitarian geologists, there is now overwhelming evidence as presented even in a NOVA TV program that the primary features of the Scablands formed rapidly from a catastrophic breach of Lake Missoula causing a massive regional flood. Of course evolutionary geologists still argue that the landscape was formed over tens of thousands of years, now by claiming there must have been a hundred Missoula floods. However, the evidence that there was Only One Lake Missoula Flood has been powerfully reinforced by a University of Colorado Ph.D. thesis. So the Scablands itself is no longer available to old-earthers as de facto evidence for the passage of millions of years. * The Heart Mountain Detachment: in Wyoming just east of Yellowstone, this mountain did not break apart slowly by uniformitarian processes but in only about half-an-hour as widely reported including in the evolutionist LiveScience.com, "Land Speed Record: Mountain Moves 62 Miles in 30 Minutes." The evidence indicates that this mountain of rock covering 425 square miles rapidly broke into 50 pieces and slid apart over an area of more than 1,300 square miles in a biblical, not a "geological," timeframe.  * "150 Million" year-old Squid Ink Not Decomposed: This still-writable ink had dehydrated but had not decomposed! The British Geological Survey's Dr. Phil Wilby, who excavated the fossil, said, "It is difficult to imagine how you can have something as soft and sloppy as an ink sac fossilised in three dimensions, still black, and inside a rock that is 150 million years old." And the Daily Mail states that, "the black ink was of exactly the same structure as that of today's version", just desiccated. And Wilby added, "Normally you would find only the hard parts like the shell and bones fossilised but... these creatures... can be dissected as if they are living animals, you can see the muscle fibres and cells. It is difficult to imagine... The structure is similar to ink from a modern squid so we can write with it..." Why is this difficult for evolutionists to imagine? Because as Dr. Carl Wieland writes, "Chemical structures 'fall apart' all by themselves over time due to the randomizing effects of molecular motion." Decades ago Bob Enyart broadcast a geology program about Mount St. Helens' catastrophic destruction of forests and the hydraulic transportation and upright deposition of trees. Later, Bob met the chief ranger from Haleakala National Park on Hawaii's island of Maui, Mark Tanaka-Sanders. The ranger agreed to correspond with his colleague at Yellowstone to urge him to have the sign removed. Thankfully, it was then removed. (See also AIG, CMI, and all the original Yellowstone exhibit photos.) Groundbreaking research conducted by creation geologist Dr. Steve Austin in Spirit Lake after Mount St. Helens eruption provided a modern-day analog to the formation of Yellowstone fossil forest. A steam blast from that volcano blew over tens of thousands of trees leaving them without attached roots. Many thousands of those trees were floating upright in Spirit Lake, and began sinking at varying rates into rapidly and sporadically deposited sediments. Once Yellowstone's successive forest interpretation was falsified (though like with junk DNA, it's too big to fail, so many atheists and others still cling to it), the erroneous sign was removed. * Asiatic vs. European Honeybees: These two populations of bees have been separated supposedly for seven million years. A researcher decided to put the two together to see what would happen. What we should have here is a failure to communicate that would have resulted after their "language" evolved over millions of years. However, European and Asiatic honeybees are still able to communicate, putting into doubt the evolutionary claim that they were separated over "geologic periods." For more, see the Public Library of Science, Asiatic Honeybees Can Understand Dance Language of European Honeybees. (Oh yeah, and why don't fossils of poorly-formed honeycombs exist, from the millions of years before the bees and natural selection finally got the design right? Ha! Because they don't exist! :) Nautiloid proves rapid limestone formation.* Remember the Nautiloids: In the Grand Canyon there is a limestone layer averaging seven feet thick that runs the 277 miles of the canyon (and beyond) that covers hundreds of square miles and contains an average of one nautiloid fossil per square meter. Along with many other dead creatures in this one particular layer, 15% of these nautiloids were killed and then fossilized standing on their heads. Yes, vertically. They were caught in such an intense and rapid catastrophic flow that gravity was not able to cause all of their dead carcasses to fall over on their sides. Famed Mount St. Helens geologist Steve Austin is also the world's leading expert on nautiloid fossils and has worked in the canyon and presented his findings to the park's rangers at the invitation of National Park Service officials. Austin points out, as is true of many of the world's mass fossil graveyards, that this enormous nautiloid deposition provides indisputable proof of the extremely rapid formation of a significant layer of limestone near the bottom of the canyon, a layer like the others we've been told about, that allegedly formed at the bottom of a calm and placid sea with slow and gradual sedimentation. But a million nautiloids, standing on their heads, literally, would beg to differ. At our sister stie, RSR provides the relevant Geologic Society of America abstract, links, and video. *  Now It's Allegedly Two Million Year-Old Leaves: "When we started pulling leaves out of the soil, that was surreal, to know that it's millions of years old..." sur-re-al: adjective: a bizarre mix of fact and fantasy. In this case, the leaves are the facts. Earth scientists from Ohio State and the University of Minnesota say that wood and leaves they found in the Canadian Arctic are at least two million years old, and perhaps more than ten million years old, even though the leaves are just dry and crumbly and the wood still burns! * Gold Precipitates in Veins in Less than a Second: After geologists submitted for decades to the assumption that each layer of gold would deposit at the alleged super slow rates of geologic process, the journal Nature Geoscience reports that each layer of deposition can occur within a few tenths of a second. Meanwhile, at the Lihir gold deposit in Papua New Guinea, evolutionists assumed the more than 20 million ounces of gold in the Lihir reserve took millions of years to deposit, but as reported in the journal Science, geologists can now demonstrate that the deposit could have formed in thousands of years, or far more quickly! Iceland's not-so-old Surtsey Island looks ancient.* Surtsey Island, Iceland: Of the volcanic island that formed in 1963, New Scientist reported in 2007 about Surtsey that "geographers... marvel that canyons, gullies and other land features that typically take tens of thousands or millions of years to form were created in less than a decade." Yes. And Sigurdur Thorarinsson, Iceland's chief  geologist, wrote in the months after Surtsey formed, "that the time scale," he had been trained "to attach to geological developments is misleading." [For what is said to] take thousands of years... the same development may take a few weeks or even days here [including to form] a landscape... so varied and mature that it was almost beyond belief... wide sandy beaches and precipitous crags... gravel banks and lagoons, impressive cliffs… hollows, glens and soft undulating land... fractures and faultscarps, channels and screes… confounded by what met your eye... boulders worn by the surf, some of which were almost round... -Iceland's chief geologist * The Palouse River Gorge: In the southeast of Washington State, the Palouse River Gorge is one of many features formed rapidly by 500 cubic miles of water catastrophically released with the breaching of a natural dam in the Lake Missoula Flood (which gouged out the Scablands as described above). So, hard rock can be breached and eroded rapidly. * Leaf Shapes Identical for 190 Million Years?  From Berkley.edu, "Ginkgo biloba... dates back to... about 190 million years ago... fossilized leaf material from the Tertiary species Ginkgo adiantoides is considered similar or even identical to that produced by modern Ginkgo biloba trees... virtually indistinguishable..." The literature describes leaf shapes as "spectacularly diverse" sometimes within a species but especially across the plant kingdom. Because all kinds of plants survive with all kinds of different leaf shapes, the conservation of a species retaining a single shape over alleged deep time is a telling issue. Darwin's theory is undermined by the unchanging shape over millions of years of a species' leaf shape. This lack of change, stasis in what should be an easily morphable plant trait, supports the broader conclusion that chimp-like creatures did not become human beings and all the other ambitious evolutionary creation of new kinds are simply imagined. (Ginkgo adiantoides and biloba are actually the same species. Wikipedia states, "It is doubtful whether the Northern Hemisphere fossil species of Ginkgo can be reliably distinguished." For oftentimes, as documented by Dr. Carl Werner in his Evolution: The Grand Experiment series, paleontogists falsely speciate identical specimens, giving different species names, even different genus names, to the fossil and living animals that appear identical.) * Box Canyon, Idaho: Geologists now think Box Canyon in Idaho, USA, was carved by a catastrophic flood and not slowly over millions of years with 1) huge plunge pools formed by waterfalls; 2) the almost complete removal of large basalt boulders from the canyon; 3) an eroded notch on the plateau at the top of the canyon; and 4) water scour marks on the basalt plateau leading to the canyon. Scientists calculate that the flood was so large that it could have eroded the whole canyon in as little as 35 days. See the journal Science, Formation of Box Canyon, Idaho, by Megaflood, and the Journal of Creation, and Creation Magazine. * Manganese Nodules Rapid Formation: Allegedly, as claimed at the Wikipedia entry from 2005 through 2021: "Nodule growth is one of the slowest of all geological phenomena – in the order of a centimeter over several million years." Wow, that would be slow! And a Texas A&M Marine Sciences technical slide presentation says, “They grow very slowly (mm/million years) and can be tens of millions of years old.” But according to a World Almanac documentary they have formed "around beer cans," said marine geologist Dr. John Yates in the 1997 video Universe Beneath the Sea: The Next Frontier. There are also reports of manganese nodules forming around ships sunk in the First World War. See more at at youngearth.com, at TOL, in the print edition of the Journal of Creation, and in this typical forum discussion with atheists (at the Chicago Cubs forum no less :). * "6,000 year-old" Mitochondrial Eve: As the Bible calls "Eve... the mother of all living" (Gen. 3:20), genetic researchers have named the one woman from whom all humans have descended "Mitochondrial Eve." But in a scientific attempt to date her existence, they openly admit that they included chimpanzee DNA in their analysis in order to get what they viewed as a reasonably old date of 200,000 years ago (which is still surprisingly recent from their perspective, but old enough not to strain Darwinian theory too much). But then as widely reported including by Science magazine, when they dropped the chimp data and used only actual human mutation rates, that process determined that Eve lived only six thousand years ago! In Ann Gibbon's Science article, "Calibrating the Mitochondrial Clock," rather than again using circular reasoning by assuming their conclusion (that humans evolved from ape-like creatures), they performed their calculations using actual measured mutation rates. This peer-reviewed journal then reported that if these rates have been constant, "mitochondrial Eve… would be a mere 6000 years old." See also the journal Nature and creation.com's "A shrinking date for Eve," and Walt Brown's assessment. Expectedly though, evolutionists have found a way to reject their own unbiased finding (the conclusion contrary to their self-interest) by returning to their original method of using circular reasoning, as reported in the American Journal of Human Genetics, "calibrating against recent evidence for the divergence time of humans and chimpanzees,"  to reset their mitochondrial clock back to 200,000 years. * Even Younger Y-Chromosomal Adam: (Although he should be called, "Y-Chromosomal Noah.") While we inherit our mtDNA only from our mothers, only men have a Y chromosome (which incidentally genetically disproves the claim that the fetus is "part of the woman's body," since the little boy's y chromosome could never be part of mom's body). Based on documented mutation rates on and the extraordinary lack o

AROUND a decade from now, astrobiologists from NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) will be looking out for a ballistic delivery from the heavens: the first space capsule containing soil and rock samples from the surface of Mars. Could there be dangerous pathogens in these Martian samples?http://www.troubledminds.org ⬇⬇⬇ Support The Show! ⬇⬇⬇➡ https://www.patreon.com/troubledminds ⬅➡ https://teespring.com/stores/troubled-minds-store ⬅Facebook - https://bit.ly/2CVEsySFringe.fm Tues-Wed-Thurs 7-9pst - https://fringe.fm/iTunes - https://apple.co/2zZ4hx6Soundcloud - https://bit.ly/2FZp72aSpotify - https://spoti.fi/2UgyzqMStitcher - https://bit.ly/2UfAiMXTuneIn - https://bit.ly/2FZOErSTwitter - https://bit.ly/2CYB71UShow contributions below...thank you!https://www.instagram.com/martingrahn...https://www.martingrahn.com/shophttps://soundcloud.com/ajdarehttps://www.youtube.com/user/VanishaG...-- https://www.amazon.com/Stories-Fractured-Mind-Robert-Collection-ebook/dp/B07D1RVX7Y -- Robert's Book-- https://dlive.tv/TinFoilTimothy --- FOLLOW TINFOIL TIMOTHY HERE ----- https://youtu.be/7Zo7v6aMd_E -- Ed's UFO Video From Airplane Window-- https://www.instagram.com/tamlbam/ -- FOLLOW TamBam HERE!https://www.bitchute.com/video/kqgHaJ9Z9Knl -- Follow Dark Uglies HERE! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxAGuqKOHAftlipbdVumbXg -- Follow Dark Uglies HERE! https://youtu.be/3FlDhop3BjA----------------------------------------------------------------------------https://youtu.be/8u-KbtLHAqQhttps://www.newscientist.com/article/mg25033323-100-why-bringing-martian-rocks-back-to-earth-is-a-bad-idea/https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/04/13/best-evidence-yet-coronavirus-came-wuhan-bsl-4-lab-14712https://x-files.fandom.com/wiki/Purityhttps://mars.nasa.gov/news/8822/a-martian-roundtrip-nasas-perseverance-rover-sample-tubes/https://scitechdaily.com/alien-microorganism-research-shows-humans-and-other-mammals-could-struggle-to-fight-space-germs/https://www.news4jax.com/news/weird-news/2021/05/01/can-you-help-northside-residents-solve-mystery-of-weird-brown-stuff-falling-on-property/https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/06/16/would-extraterrestrial-bacteria-be-dangerous-to-humans/https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.ppat.1008153https://time.com/5793520/coronavirus-alien-life/https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/06/infectious-diseases-extinction/487514/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_cultural_impact_of_extraterrestrial_contacthttps://www.inquisitr.com/3993261/some-scientists-fear-first-contact-with-aliens-could-be-last-contact-heres-why/http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/66083/1/Roy_et_al-2016-Conservation_Letters.pdfhttps://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2018/01/24/575974220/are-there-zombie-viruses-in-the-thawing-permafrosthttps://now.northropgrumman.com/can-viruses-survive-in-space-the-pathogen-particle-prognosis/https://listverse.com/2016/12/15/10-diseases-that-possibly-came-from-outer-space/https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2020/08/26/what-is-panspermia-new-evidence-for-the-wild-theory-that-says-we-could-all-be-space-aliens/https://www.panspermia-theory.com/panspermia-theories/lithopanspermiahttps://www.theguardian.com/science/2000/jan/19/spaceexploration.medicineandhealthhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/elon-musk-says-a-bunch-of-people-will-probably-die-when-humans-fly-to-mars-volunteers-only/ar-BB1g4LtQhttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=doge&ia=cryptocurrencyhttps://www.cnn.com/2021/05/04/europe/italy-melting-glacier-war-artifacts-scli-intl/index.htmlhttps://www.politico.com/amp/news/2021/05/04/space-national-guard-plans-485368

Le monde est fini !  Il n'est pas infini quoi, et ses ressources non plus. La nature produit continuellement de quoi nous nourrir et produire de l'énergie. Mais nous consommons plus quelle ne produit, nous tapons dans le capital et nous impactons violemment les écosystèmes.   Ca ne va pas pouvoir durer, et assurément ceux qui nous gouvernent savent qu'ils doivent inféoder l'économie à cette réalité. Non ?   Pour en parler nous recevons Rodolphe, alias le réveilleur, doctorant en sciences de l'environnement, et lui même vidéaste (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1EacOJoqsKaYxaDomTCTEQ)  Conseil de lecture (dans l'ordre):   - "Les limites à la croissance dans un monde fini", Donella Meadows, Denis Meadows, Jorgen Randers  -"'Economix" : la première histoire de l'économie en BD, Dan E. Burr et Michael Goodwin  - "Comment tout peut s'effondrer", Pablo Servigne, Raphaël Stevens  - "Le Capital au XXIème siècle", Thomas Piketty   Un blog sympathique sur l'environnement: https://alaingrandjean.fr/  L'article évoqué sur le lien Bonheur/PIB: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0079358 Lien youtube : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn5oGHBGFiA Merci beaucoup à ceux qui soutiennent déjà le travail de la Tronche en Biais via les plateformes de financement :  - Helloasso : https://www.helloasso.com/associations/association-pour-la-science-et-la-transmission-de-l-esprit-critique - Tipeee : https://fr.tipeee.com/la-tronche-en-biais - Utip : https://utip.io/astec - La boutique de la TeB : https://shop.spreadshirt.fr/la-tronche-en-biais/ Présentation : Acermendax & Vled Tapas Design : Loki Jackal Régie/réalisation : Guillaume Cervantes Musique : Vled Tapas Editeur podcast : Corentin Savre

Implement a detoxification program to get rid of heavy metals and glyphosate. This is important as these toxins contribute to inflammation. To improve detoxification, I recommend activating your natural glutathione production with CELL GEVITY a science based breakthrough product. Check it out here max.com/1981142 or email me albert@alberttdonkor.com for any further discussion. A simple way to raise your pH if it's too acidic (and most people are) is to take one-fourth teaspoon of sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) or potassium bicarbonate in water a few times a day Sources and References; https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/03/02/covid-vaccine-testing.aspx https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340917045_Endogenous_deficiency_of_glutathione_as_the_most_likely_cause_of_serious_manifestations_and_death_in_patients_with_the_novel_coronavirus_infection_COVID-19_a_hypothesis_based_on_literature_data_and_ow https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30730-X/fulltext https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?fbclid=IwAR2znc1tk21X1c0NJW3YT_nphHFkXjWLTr7-a1SKyiALI_hUlbA_tdYqbLk&id=10.1371%2Fjournal.ppat.1001176 https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Zinc-HealthProfessional/ --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/nutrition-point/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/nutrition-point/support

Semaglutide works for weight loss but at what co$t? BOARD CHANGER- New gonorrhea guidelines Diabetes drugs are expensive for our patients and we can't forget that. Children find it hard to tell what facial expression you are giving when you have a mask on! https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183 industry-conducted trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Researchers randomized nearly 2000 participants without diabetes who were either overweight with at least one weight-related comorbidity or obese to receive All2.4 mg subcutaneous semaglutide or placebo weekly for 68 weeks. mean bmi 38. weighing at 105 lbs. Mean weight loss was significantly greater with semaglutide than placebo (15% vs. 2%), as was the percentage of patients losing >5% of body weight (86% vs. 32%). difference is 31lbs-- over 68weeks or 16 months.. the drug cost 734$ per month. that is 11,744 for treatment or 379 per pound. not worth it to me twitter and say shouldnt you have the conversation?!? BOARD CHANGER The CDC now recommends treating uncomplicated gonorrhea with a single 500-mg intramuscular dose of ceftriaxone, according to updated guidelines in MMWR. The recommendation applies to urogenital, anorectal, and pharyngeal infections. Previously, the CDC recommended ceftriaxone plus oral azithromycin. The authors note that azithromycin resistance is "an increasing concern." Nationwide, the percentage of N. gonorrhoeae isolates with reduced susceptibility to azithromycin increased from 0.6% in 2013 to 4.6% in 2018. Among the recommendations: People weighing ≥150 kg should be given a single 1-g dose of ceftriaxone. In patients for whom a chlamydial infection has not been ruled out, doxycycline 100 mg orally twice a day for 7 days is also recommended. For patients with cephalosporin allergy, an intramuscular dose of gentamicin (240 mg) plus an oral dose of azithromycin (2 g) may be considered. In cases where intramuscular ceftriaxone can't be given, an oral dose of cefixime (800 mg) is an option, but the authors note it may not be as effective. For pharyngeal gonorrhea, there are no reliable alternative therapies and test-of-cure is recommended. Update to CDC's Treatment Guidelines for Gonococcal Infection, 2020 | MMWR BOARD ANSWER CHANGER https://news.wisc.edu/can-blocking-a-frown-keep-bad-feelings-at-bay/ remember that article back in 2010 which basically showed those people to get botox had decrease ability to defer emotions or facial expressions of others?? It was out of the university of wisconin and not they are back at it with this article---- https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0243708 Children’s emotion inferences from masked faces: Implications for social interactions during COVID-19 Plos one This study took 81 7-13yr old child to see how children perceived others’ emotions as partial information about the face was presented pictures of stereotypical facial configurations associated with sadness, anger, and fear posed by male and female models. Pictures were presented in unaltered format (i.e., with no covering) or digitally altered to be (a) covered with a surgical face mask that obscured the mouth and nose, or (b) covered with sunglasses that obscured the eyes and eyebrows The primary question addressed by this study is whether masks meaningfully degraded children’s ability to infer others’ emotions “Accuracy between the faces that wore masks and shades did not differ” And that was the others conclsuions “These data suggest that while there may be some challenges for children incurred by others wearing masks, in combination with other contextual cues, masks are unlikely to dramatically impair children’s social interactions in their everyday lives” But that doesn’t tell the whole story Because when you look at the results you see that both sunglasses and mask did present a challenge for kids compared to no mask or no sunglasses. About a 10% absolute difference or a 33% realtive difference and althought you cant really use NNT in this type of trial if you were that would be a NNH of 10. For every 10 kids, 1 kid has a dramatic impairment in their ability to infer others emotions with the use of mask or sunglasses This is not me being antimask. This is not me saying that mask are the devil. This is me saying there are real effects to what we are doing and we have to be prepared for them and one of them might be children that are not able to infer emotions as well. Update to CDC's Treatment Guidelines for Gonococcal Infection, 2020 new guidelines regarding treatment of gonorrhea- Prior recommendations had included treating a patient for both gonorrhea and chlamydia when there was a positive gonorrhea test regardless of chlamydia results. These updated guidelines recommend not treating a patient for chlamydia if the patient is diagnosed with gonorrhea if testing shows no chlamydia infection. Treatment for both is still recommended if chlamydia status is unknown. Dosing for gonorrhea treatment was also increased from ceftriaxone 250mg IM to 500mg IM, and treatment for coinfection with chlamydia was changed from azithromycin to doxycycline with a longer course of 7 days. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020. 2922?guestAccessKey=3ed2a6bb-bc67-4b5e-955c- 08cc5b7bedf6&utm_source=silverchair&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=article_alert- jamainternalmedicine&utm_content=etoc&utm_term=120720 ben franklin is linked to the famous saying “a penny saved is a penny earned” well I wonder what he would say about our next and last paper titled- Out-of-Pocket Costs for Novel Guideline-Directed Diabetes Therapies Under Medicare Part D Which did exactly as the article suggests and looked at the cost of novel diabetic agents under Medicare part D which covers almost 45,000,000 people. They reviewed 6 drug classes and projected annual out-of-pocket costs Across near 3000 Part D plans commonly covered GLP-1RAs, SGLT2is, and DPP-4is had monthly list prices between $434 to $935 compared with $3 to $11 for metformin, sulfonylureas, and TZDs. What does that mean for your patient, how does that translate into real world information?? Well, annual costs for common novel agents were $5202 to $11 225 with only $31 to $136 for traditional drugs And the Projected annual out-of-pocket cost for novel drug regimen were $1231 to $1981, compared with $250 to $355 for traditional regimens. Considering at best these new agents have a NNT of 20 the variability to prevent one nonfatal event that approaches 100K needs to be seriously looked at.

Imagens que têm cheiro.Sons que têm imagens. Imagens que viram letras.Palavras que viram números.E por aí vai.Afinal, o que é e como se dá a sinestesia?Confira no papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.OUÇA (49min 12s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAA Alura tem mais de 1.000 cursos de diversas áreas e é a maior plataforma de cursos online do Brasil -- e você tem acesso a todos com uma única assinatura.Aproveite o desconto de R$100 para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://www.alura.com.br/promocao/naruhodo *REFERÊNCIASReduced perceptual narrowing in synesthesiahttps://www.pnas.org/content/117/18/10089.shortChapter 1 - Bouba-Kiki: Cross-domain resonance and the origins of synesthesia, metaphor, and words in the human mindhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128124925000012A case of co-occuring synesthesia, autism, prodigious talent and strong structural brain connectivityhttps://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-020-02722-wSynesthesia: the current state of the fieldhttps://www.sciencedirect.com.sci-hub.st/science/article/pii/B9780128124925000139Perceptual processing links autism and synesthesia: a twin studyhttps://psyarxiv.com/b2mvg/A longitudinal study of grapheme-color synesthesia in childhood: 6/7 years to 10/11 yearshttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00603/fullThe Anatomy of Onomatopoeiahttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0028317When "Bouba" equals "Kiki": Cultural commonalities and cultural differences in sound-shape correspondenceshttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4882484/Assessing sound symbolism: Investigating phonetic forms, visual shapes and letter fonts in an implicit bouba-kiki experimental paradigmhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0208874Is a High Tone Pointy? Speakers of Different Languages Match Mandarin Chinese Tones to Visual Shapes Differentlyhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02139/fullNeural Basis of Individual Differences in Synesthetic Experienceshttps://www.jneurosci.org/content/30/18/6205The neuroanatomy of grapheme-color synesthesiahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06673.xEditorial: Perception–Cognition Interface and Cross-Modal Experiences: Insights into Unified Consciousnesshttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01593/fullTestes de Sinestesia: https://www.synesthesiatest.org/blog/synesthesia-test-variationsNaruhodo #131 - O que é ASMR?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-131-o-que-e-asmr/Naruhodo #172 - Porque as nuvens tem formato de alguma coisa?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-172-por-que-as-nuvens-tem-o-formato-de-alguma-coisa/Naruhodo #211- O que são pessoas superdotadas?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-211-o-que-sao-pessoas-superdotadas/Naruhodo #78 - Como funciona a memória?https://www.b9.com.br/74576/naruhodo-78-como-funciona-memoria/Podcasts das #Minas: SE FOSSE FÁCIL ERA EXATAS#MulheresPodcastershttps://open.spotify.com/show/6sLbz7FHQGD5S54h9TluIj*APOIE O NARUHODO!Você sabia que pode ajudar a manter o Naruhodo no ar?Ao contribuir, você pode ter acesso ao grupo fechado no Telegram, receber conteúdos exclusivos e ter vantagens especiais.Assine o apoio mensal pelo PicPay: https://picpay.me/naruhodopodcast