Podcasts about Lagrangian

  • 48PODCASTS
  • 85EPISODES
  • 42mAVG DURATION
  • ?INFREQUENT EPISODES
  • Oct 4, 2024LATEST

POPULARITY

20172018201920202021202220232024


Best podcasts about Lagrangian

Latest podcast episodes about Lagrangian

The Stephen Wolfram Podcast
History of Science & Technology Q&A (September 4, 2024)

The Stephen Wolfram Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 4, 2024 86:21


Stephen Wolfram answers questions from his viewers about the history of science and technology as part of an unscripted livestream series, also available on YouTube here: https://wolfr.am/youtube-sw-qa Questions include: When, for you, was a computational approach introduced to the scientific process or the scientific culture? - Who began the trend of naming discoveries, inventions, etc. after yourself? - Became clear? How? Pretty sure no one ever solved the three-body equation. - Commentary about naming conventions. - The Trojan asteroids are named after characters from the Trojan War in Greek mythology because of the convention that started with the discovery of the first few such asteroids near Jupiter. These asteroids occupy stable Lagrangian points (L4 and L5) in Jupiter's orbit, and astronomers decided to name them after heroes from the Trojan War, with those at L4 being named after Greek heroes and those at L5 named after Trojan heroes. - Any planned work with tungsten? - ​​​​Regarding naming, is there are good naming convention is computer languages? - What's your view of innovation in economic science? We are nearly 250 years since Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations. - Recall the idea of "Recapitate" instead of "Apply."

Demystifying Science
Reverse Physics - Dr. Gabriele Carcassi, U. Michigan, DSPod #265

Demystifying Science

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2024 179:56


Prof. Gabriele Carcassi is a University of Michigan Physicists who became obsessed with a simple question during his training. Where do the mathematics of physics actually come from? They are handed down to us as students as if they were immutable laws of nature… but are they? Or are they simply mathematical transformations that have long ago left the realm of reality and made their home in the spheres of theory? It turns out that we really don't know where the line between pure theory and physical reality can be drawn! Luckily, Carcassi and his research partner Prof. Christine Aidala have dedicated their time to deciphering what they call the “Assumptions of Physics,” a project which they hope will let them take apart the basic principles of the foundational science and put the whole thing back together again in a way that makes much more sense. Sign up for our Patreon and get episodes early + join our weekly Patron Chat https://bit.ly/3lcAasB AND rock some Demystify Gear to spread the word! https://demystifysci.myspreadshop.com/ Check out Carcassi's Assumptions of Physics project: https://assumptionsofphysics.org/ Check out Carcassi's Youtube Page:  @gcarcassi  Check out the Assumptions of Physics YouTube page:  @AssumptionsofPhysicsResearch  00:00 Go! 00:06:00 Reverse physics 00:07:07 Standard physics approach 00:09:36 Lagrangian rulers 00:19:15 What is a physical dimension? 00:27:51 What is an electron, really? 00:34:30 Physical objects as informational bins 00:48:45 Math & intuition 01:00:57 Begging for money in basic science 01:21:48 Physics envy 01:36:47 Reverse physics undermines standard approach? 01:48:38 Constants of nature 02:05:52 Empiricists v. rationalists 02:35:36 Interpreting quantum spin 02:53:22 Michael Levin #sciencepodcast #longformpodcast #physics, #scienceeducation, #quantumphysics, #physicsresearch, #assumptionsofphysics, #physicsdimensions, #electron, #physicsintuition, #empiricism, #rationalism Check our short-films channel, @DemystifySci: https://www.youtube.com/c/DemystifyingScience AND our material science investigations of atomics, @MaterialAtomics https://www.youtube.com/@MaterialAtomics Join our mailing list https://bit.ly/3v3kz2S PODCAST INFO: Anastasia completed her PhD studying bioelectricity at Columbia University. When not talking to brilliant people or making movies, she spends her time painting, reading, and guiding backcountry excursions. Shilo also did his PhD at Columbia studying the elastic properties of molecular water. When he's not in the film studio, he's exploring sound in music. They are both freelance professors at various universities. - Blog: http://DemystifySci.com/blog - RSS: https://anchor.fm/s/2be66934/podcast/rss - Donate: https://bit.ly/3wkPqaD - Swag: https://bit.ly/2PXdC2y SOCIAL: - Discord: https://discord.gg/MJzKT8CQub - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/DemystifySci - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/DemystifySci/ - Twitter: https://twitter.com/DemystifySci MUSIC: -Shilo Delay: https://g.co/kgs/oty671

Crazy Wisdom
Microgravity Magic: Varda's Vision for Space Manufacturing

Crazy Wisdom

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 18, 2024 51:54


In this episode of the Crazy Wisdom Podcast, Stewart Alsop interviews Delian Asparouhov, co-founder and president of Varda. They discuss the science and commercial potential of manufacturing pharmaceuticals in microgravity, the regulatory and technical challenges of space missions, the future of space colonization driven by economic activities, and the advancements in propulsion technologies. Delian also shares insights on the importance of the U.S. space economy, the potential of lunar mining, and his long-term vision for space exploration. For more updates on Varda, follow their corporate Twitter at @vardaspace. Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation! Timestamps 00:00:00 - Introduction and initial discussion about pronouncing Delian Asparouhov's last name. Delian talks about the terminology for space laboratory. 00:05:00 - Delian explains the advantages of manufacturing pharmaceuticals in microgravity and the science behind it. Analogy of cooking in a kitchen is used to describe the process. 00:10:00 - Discussion on the historical background of pharmaceutical manufacturing in space. Delian talks about the involvement of NASA and big pharmaceutical companies. 00:15:00 - The transition from proof of concept to commercialization of space manufacturing. Delian explains the regulatory challenges faced with FAA for launching and reentry. 00:20:00 - Coordinating with multiple parties for successful space missions. Discussion about the future potential of landing missions outside the United States, specifically mentioning Australia. 00:25:00 - Delian discusses the current space economy, SpaceX's impact, and the dominance of the United States in mass to orbit. 00:30:00 - The vastness of space and how much space there is for satellites and other objects. Delian mentions the Lagrangian points as useful waypoints in space. 00:35:00 - Speculation about long-term human colonization in space driven by economic activities. Delian talks about the potential of lunar surface mining and manufacturing. 00:40:00 - The possibility of large-scale manufacturing on the moon and the resources available there. Delian explains the importance of economic activity for space colonization. 00:45:00 - Discussion on propulsion technologies, including electric propulsion and the future potential of warp drives. Delian explains the physics behind various propulsion methods. 00:50:00 - Delian's thoughts on the philosophical aspects of the universe and the laws of physics. He reflects on the fortuitous conditions that led to life on Earth. 00:55:00 - The role of quantum mechanics in modern technology. Delian mentions that while quantum mechanics influence technologies like semiconductors, they haven't directly influenced Varda's work yet. Key Insights 1-The Advantages of Microgravity for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: Delian Asparouhov explains how the microgravity environment of space allows for unique chemical reactions and crystal formations that are impossible on Earth. By removing the influence of gravity, substances can mix and react more uniformly, leading to potentially better and more stable pharmaceutical products. 2-Historical Context and Industry Involvement: The idea of using space for manufacturing isn't new. Delian discusses how major pharmaceutical companies like Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb, as well as NASA, have been experimenting with microgravity for decades. Varda's approach builds on this history but aims to commercialize the process using modern, cost-effective technology. 3-Regulatory Challenges and Achievements: Varda faced significant regulatory hurdles, particularly with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), to secure permissions for launching and reentering spacecraft. Delian highlights the complexity of coordinating with multiple parties, including the military and commercial partners, to ensure mission success and safety. 4-The Dominance of the U.S. in the Space Economy: Delian emphasizes that the United States is currently the leader in space activities, contributing the majority of mass to orbit. While other countries like China and India are making strides, the U.S. remains at the forefront due to its regulatory framework and technological advancements. 5-The Future of Space Colonization: Delian envisions a future where economic activities in space, such as those conducted by Varda, drive human colonization. He believes that large-scale, autonomous manufacturing facilities in orbit and on the lunar surface will pave the way for sustainable human presence in space. 6-Innovations in Propulsion Technologies: The discussion covers advancements in propulsion, particularly electric propulsion using ionized particles. Delian mentions a promising startup, MagDrive, which aims to revolutionize space travel with more efficient and powerful propulsion systems, potentially enabling longer and more economical missions. 7-Economic and Environmental Potential of Lunar Resources: The moon's unique geological features and lack of tectonic activity make it a rich source of raw materials, including water ice and rare earth minerals. Delian explains that lunar mining could support space-based industries and reduce the costs associated with launching materials from Earth, ultimately fostering a robust lunar economy.

Unstoppable Mindset
Episode 167 – Unstoppable Forger of Men with Cartwright Morris

Unstoppable Mindset

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 3, 2023 68:19


Our guest this time, Cartwright Morris, teaches young executives and leaders to live life as an adventure. He does this to help them learn how to gain true confidence in their personal and professional lives.   Cartwright didn't start out himself as a very confident person. He will discuss his youth and growing up not really sure of life, where it would take him and what he was going to do with his future.   Eventually through circumstances, as so often happens with all of us, he discovers that he has a real gift of being able to help young men to discover how they can become better than they thought. He helps them to become leaders and confident. He will tell us things like the difference between confidence and arrogance. His discussion of what makes a good leader is invaluable for all of us to ponder.   I did ask Cartwright if his coaching programs today are strictly for men or does he coach women as well. No prejudice on Cartwright's part. As he puts it, he stays mainly on his side of the bridge, but he has coached women and he does recognize that women, like men, are indeed forged or molded by life.   I hope you will seek out his podcast, “Men Are Forged”. I know I plan to go have it a listen.     About the Guest:   Cartwright Morris is a speaker and certified leadership development coach for young professionals in sales/management. He equips each individual to live life as an adventure and make impact through gaining confidence in selling and leadership roles.   He has worked with hundreds of emerging leaders in the US and abroad. He has spent over 12 years managing and developing leaders at organizations like Calvert & Associates, The Center For Executive Leadership, JH Ranch, and Heaven in Business in California. He has over 2000 hours of coaching and mentoring while becoming a growing thought leader on how to confront the unknown and navigate business and life with confidence. Cartwright has developed his lifelong message into his keynote presentation and his 3 Month Coaching Program where he implements his framework for gaining confidence in the selling process, development of relationships, and everyday life. He hosts the growing podcast, MEN ARE FORGED. A podcast to empower men to be forged by their experiences, challenges, and hardships. Each episode shares the personal stories and insights from great men in business, family, and management who grew into leaders from their days of indecision and insecurity.   He spent much of his 20s and 30s living the single life as an adventure; traveling, exploring new places, meeting new people, and experiencing the outdoors. On March 11, 2022, Cartwright married his wife, Bethany, and they now explore together while residing in Birmingham, Alabama.   Ways to connect with Cartwright: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/cartwright-morris/ Youtube Page: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjklTnT2LOd_06VLlth3DSg   ADDITIONS: Media Guide - Google Doc     About the Host: Michael Hingson is a New York Times best-selling author, international lecturer, and Chief Vision Officer for accessiBe. Michael, blind since birth, survived the 9/11 attacks with the help of his guide dog Roselle. This story is the subject of his best-selling book, Thunder Dog.   Michael gives over 100 presentations around the world each year speaking to influential groups such as Exxon Mobile, AT&T, Federal Express, Scripps College, Rutgers University, Children's Hospital, and the American Red Cross just to name a few. He is Ambassador for the National Braille Literacy Campaign for the National Federation of the Blind and also serves as Ambassador for the American Humane Association's 2012 Hero Dog Awards.   https://michaelhingson.com https://www.facebook.com/michael.hingson.author.speaker/ https://twitter.com/mhingson https://www.youtube.com/user/mhingson https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelhingson/   accessiBe Links https://accessibe.com/ https://www.youtube.com/c/accessiBe https://www.linkedin.com/company/accessibe/mycompany/ https://www.facebook.com/accessibe/       Thanks for listening! Thanks so much for listening to our podcast! If you enjoyed this episode and think that others could benefit from listening, please share it using the social media buttons on this page. Do you have some feedback or questions about this episode? Leave a comment in the section below!   Subscribe to the podcast If you would like to get automatic updates of new podcast episodes, you can subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts or Stitcher. You can also subscribe in your favorite podcast app.   Leave us an Apple Podcasts review Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts, which exposes our show to more awesome listeners like you. If you have a minute, please leave an honest review on Apple Podcasts.     Transcription Notes   Michael Hingson ** 00:00 Access Cast and accessiBe Initiative presents Unstoppable Mindset. The podcast where inclusion, diversity and the unexpected meet. Hi, I'm Michael Hingson, Chief Vision Officer for accessiBe and the author of the number one New York Times bestselling book, Thunder dog, the story of a blind man, his guide dog and the triumph of trust. Thanks for joining me on my podcast as we explore our own blinding fears of inclusion unacceptance and our resistance to change. We will discover the idea that no matter the situation, or the people we encounter, our own fears, and prejudices often are our strongest barriers to moving forward. The unstoppable mindset podcast is sponsored by accessiBe, that's a c c e s s i  capital B e. Visit www.accessibe.com to learn how you can make your website accessible for persons with disabilities. And to help make the internet fully inclusive by the year 2025. Glad you dropped by we're happy to meet you and to have you here with us.   Michael Hingson ** 01:20 Well, hello, once again, glad you're with us. I am your host, Mike Hingson. And you are listening to unstoppable mindset. Today, we have the opportunity to chat with a person who is a speaker and a certified leadership coach. And what I like best about Cartwright Morris is that what he says he does is to help equip young men and executives to live life as an adventure. And I've always felt that life needs to be lived as an adventure. We shouldn't really make it a drudge. There are always challenges. There are always fun things you may not know what's coming next. But you know what? That's part of the adventure. So with that in mind, Cartwright, welcome to unstoppable mindset. And thanks very much for being here.   Cartwright Morris ** 02:07 Well, it's glad to be here. Michael, I'm excited to just be with you today.   Michael Hingson ** 02:12 Well, we're we're kind of glad you're here. And it's I think it'd be fun lots to learn about because I know you've been very much involved in helping people with sales and other kinds of things like that. And we'll get to all that, needless to say, but I'd like to start with hearing a little bit about maybe the earlier cart right growing up and all that kind of stuff where your your from what you did, and any secrets that you don't want to tell you can leave out but the rest we'd love to hear about.   Cartwright Morris ** 02:40 Yeah, well, it's funny. I'll always say I'm born and raised in Birmingham, Alabama. I mean, you know, sometimes I like to turn up my accent, especially if I talk to some people outside the South, kind of ham it up a little bit. But actually, I live three years my life in Canada, my dad was starting to branch of his family business up in Simcoe, Ontario, if you might knows where that is, that's near kind of south of Toronto. It's kind of halfway between Toronto and buffalo. So I got to experience a little snow in my life on a regular basis. And yeah, I grew up just, you know, playing sports, love sports, the average student average athlete generally. You know, I'd say my upbringing is pretty great. You know, as you get older, you realize as a man, there's little things that we miss, that I'm learning now as adult and trying to correct and redeem and figured out. But like I said, like you put in my intro about adventure. I think there's so many times as a kid, I always wanted to be grown up, wanted to be taken seriously. And now I feel like a lot of my 20s and 30s I was going back to the man, the value of play the value of adventure and discovery and curiosity is something that I wish I didn't diminish as a child and now's adult trying to get back. So   Michael Hingson ** 04:09 so when you lived in Toronto, did they teach you that the apparently the appropriate way to say it is Toronto.   Cartwright Morris ** 04:18 You know, I was so young that I had no idea that there was the correct way to say I think we all just said our Southern way. Yes is generally never the right way. I mean, I've got friends from Australia where I you know, who's far from Melbourne? And I always say Melbourne. And so I always get it wrong.   Michael Hingson ** 04:38 So well and of course depending on where you're from and where you've lived and what you know, it's either Houston or Houston depending on right where where you're whether you spend time in New York or down in Texas, and yes, I've not ever heard that. Somebody lynched somebody for saying how stung if they were down in Texas. But I'm sure that there is a lot of angst about that. But nevertheless, that's still what it is in New York is Houston, for whatever reason. I   Cartwright Morris ** 05:08 mean, I remember I remember being in New York and I got corrected on that very quickly. It's housed in   Michael Hingson ** 05:13 its house. And I don't know what the history of that is, I guess I should really go explore that. It's like in Massachusetts, it's not Worchester. It's Wista. Not even Worcester. It's Wista.   Cartwright Morris ** 05:29 It's so funny languages. It's funny, we all are separated by our common language and English, right? Depends on just where you are in the world.   Michael Hingson ** 05:37 Yeah. There's something to be said for all the accents. Of course, each, each place would say, well, we don't have an accent, you have the accent? Right, exactly. So there you go. Well, so where did you or did you go to college?   Cartwright Morris ** 05:53 So I went to college at a place called Auburn University, which is an Alabama for those who may not know that we, you know, in the south, we love our football and Auburn is the little brother team, you know, most people who can't follow college football. So I went to Auburn, bounced around agrees, you know, I mean, I would say it's a lot big part of my story. Michael is struggling through school trying to understand how to learn. You know, now I look back, there was probably a lot of mental health related stuff that I didn't know how but also just the not knowing my direction hurt me in college, too. I think I bounced around. I mean, I went from business to different other history major, to eventually settled on, I was like, oh, I'll just be a teacher and a coach and I signed up for kinesiology classes when I was going to get into PE, B, a PE teacher visit. So that was what led me there. And then I ended up getting a degree line, I believe in Auburn, because I'm one of those people who it just took too long, it took little more than four years to graduate. You know, I guess I missed the snow, I kind of dropped out of college, went and lived in Park City, Utah was a ski bum for a season with some friends and had some fun, Joy a little bit different way of living and but eventually came home and really felt like I needed a degree. And that led to me actually transferring and going to another state school in Alabama called University of South Alabama mobiel. And I transferred there ended up getting my degree in about a year and a half. And yeah, and then let that lead me back to Birmingham, which I did not want to go back. But that led me back there. So   Michael Hingson ** 07:47 when did you get your degree in finally?   Cartwright Morris ** 07:49 So health education, okay. So I'm still chasing that idea of, you know, you know, the, the, you know, he has a, that's what I always say, I tried to mentor guys more and more in the college. I don't know what Michael, your thoughts on on on edge or modern education system. But, you know, now I look back, I'm like, I wish I took some time to kind of figure out more what I want, because I really didn't know, at 18. But now understanding my personality, taking more personality tests, understanding my idea of flexibility and autonomy and my desire to be more adventurous being in a school system, from an eight to five job would have just drain me. And I probably would not be the best husband, I probably wouldn't be the best father, I wouldn't be the best employee because it just that understanding more of my personality, but that's what I thought, you know, at the time I was, you know, you know, I thought football was the greatest thing ever, and I can help young men be a football coach. And to be a football coach, you got to start somewhere in a school system. And P made sense, because I like being active. And so but now, thankfully, doors were shut and in that area, and my path kind of veered off, and which I'm very thankful for.   Michael Hingson ** 09:15 Well, you mentioned the modern education system. I think one of our biggest problems is that we do too much studying for the tests and not studying to learn and be creative. Yes. And I think that's the the biggest issue that we've we've somehow got to get away from that because it shouldn't be all about tests. And if we're not really teaching people to think I remember when I was a graduate student. In our one year our Ph D qualifying exam, or classical mechanics was administered by a postdoc who came from I believe he Dr. Price was from Berkeley, and he came down And, and taught well, he was a good teacher. And he gave the he created as as new faculty members are often forced, if they will say it to do create the PhD qualifying exam for classical mechanics. And one of the things that that he did was he had a test of 20 questions. And the first 16 Were all basically theoretical, philosophical, mostly conceptual questions, but not math related, right. And the last four, all dealt with math, Lagrangian dynamics, and other such things. And fewer people. I don't know whether anyone actually that year passed the test. And they the faculty heads called him in and said, What are you doing? Why did you create such a hard test? And he said, hard test. Let me show you something. He pulled out his freshman, classical mechanics test. And he said, This is the final I gave students at the end of the year, the only difference between that one and the qualifying exam was that the qualifying exam had the four math questions, which were all things that people learned, kind of in junior or or later, but not or in graduate school, but not in freshman, classical mechanics, the same initial 16 questions were on the test. And people didn't get them, because they were expecting math, and they were expecting a lot of stuff rather than really learning the concepts.   Cartwright Morris ** 11:43 Yes, I think there's something too just being problem solvers. There's there's too much of a linear thinking to education. thing. Yes. To your point with that test? Yeah. Yeah.   Michael Hingson ** 11:57 And, you know, on, they couldn't very well argue with him since he showed them what he did. But nevertheless, it's it's amazing that we, we miss so much, and all we do teaching concepts and basics, and oftentimes, don't really teach you to think,   Cartwright Morris ** 12:20 hmm, yeah, yeah. I mean, I think there is there's definitely like a desire of what to think in lots of different areas, but versus how to think how to process how to problem solve, how to think how to how to take on challenge challenges, I think that was something much of my talk first 25 years of life, as I learned how to avoid challenge, hardship struggle, and now later in life, you know, learning how to do that, and just, you know, self discover it's just so much and become more self aware is led to much more of my success than the other. Right.   Michael Hingson ** 13:00 Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think it's important to do that. And I think we really need to, to teach children youth to think and I think, when we honor teachers, a lot of times when we hear the teachers who get honored with one award or another, when we hear them talk, they do talk about how they really dedicated to their students and helping the students really better themselves. And you don't hear them talking about, we just study for the test.   Cartwright Morris ** 13:33 Yeah. Yeah, I think we always remember the teachers that did do that. Yeah, I do. Yeah. 100%. I said their name, the names of there's less than a handful. That really challenged me to think versus Hey, do this, you get this? Yeah,   Michael Hingson ** 13:53 maybe it was the time, but I think I had more teachers that really did do that, rather than doing the test, but I'm talking about growing up in the 50s. And in the 60s, and there was a lot more of that. And there was a lot less of those so called standardized tests. Right. And so that probably helped. And I had some teachers that really dealt with philosophy, my freshman teacher, Mr. Wilson, my freshman English teacher in high school. I remember once he was talking about just ethics and philosophy, but had nothing to do with the English stuff that we were supposed to be learning, but he took a few minutes, and he was talking about the fact that, you know, if I owe somebody a quarter, I'm going to be bothered until I can pay them back the quarter that I owe them. And that's the way it should be because if I make a commitment to borrow something and then pay it back, I better make sure that I do that. And I had a whole bunch of bunch of other teachers who were the same way. And I remember most all of my even up through high school teachers, and they all were were that way i really wish that we had more of that today rather than teachers being forced to do the things that they do. My niece is a kindergarten teacher. And she talks about all the crazy things that teachers have to do today that make absolutely no sense in terms of whole educational system, because what are they really teaching the kids or she tries to teach her students things about reading and writing, even in kindergarten, I'm amazed at what they get to learn that we didn't get to learn. But still, there are a lot of limitations put on them, which is very frustrating.   Cartwright Morris ** 15:32 Yeah, yeah. Because what's going to be the result 1020 30 years from now, right.   Michael Hingson ** 15:39 And that's what's scary. So you eventually got out of college, and you said, doors were closed. So what happened?   Cartwright Morris ** 15:47 So I, so I left college, and I was really excited about just possibilities of where I can move and where I could go and get a job and didn't want to go back to my hometown, but job opportunity came about, and Birmingham, and it was in kind of fitness and training and mixed with some sales and getting people to this new facility in Birmingham. And I felt like it was like a Oh, as a way to get my foot in the door, maybe in the athletic space in the training space. And ventually. Yeah, that lasted about six months. And I realized this wasn't for me. You know, doing sales, you become very, either self aware, or some kind of self not really reflected the opposite. navel gazing, I guess, is the best way to say it. And I learned a lot about myself. And I needed to gain confidence in myself, I didn't, I didn't need to dress from insecurity. So eventually then left that job and actually was like, I need to go find myself, I need to figure out who I am. And I need to not find it in my hometown, where I felt like I was, you know, sometimes that familiar? I don't know how, Michael, you're familiar with the hero's journey, Joseph Campbell. Yeah, where he talks about getting away from the familiar, I think I needed that in my life. And so I literally moved to this ranch out in the middle of Northern California. You know, it's straight up i Five from where you are in Atlanta, close to Oregon. And really just I was 26. I didn't, you know, didn't know anything, I hardly knew anybody there. And, you know, most of the people that are on staff are college students, 1920 year olds, and here I was this random 26 year old come in the middle of summer, and I was working maintenance. And it was the best thing I could ever want in need in that moment where I could literally just show up, do my thing, get done in a certain hour, work hard, just kind of have everything in front of me and not have this ambiguous idea of the unknown, and really kind of just show up and really be accepting of just who I was not who my parents were not the idea of what I could be how much money I made, who I knew, you know, it was just kind of when you get your hometown and that familiar, you can start projecting, I always say I was living in a lifestyle of outside in I was constantly living my life through the eyes of other people. How can I be funny enough, seem smart enough, seem good enough and project this idea, and of who I thought I should be or or thought my parents thought I should be, even though they weren't putting pressure on me to be a certain way. And I finally got away from all that. And we're in this place where people just didn't know me from Adam. And it was kind of it was refreshing. They accepted me, I finally I think I found community, really, for the first time in a long time. And I felt accepted. And I started it was kind of the beginning of where I am now. And it was kind of this just self belief of man, I am valuable. I do add to people's lives by the words I say in my actions and articulating those things by just journaling, spending time alone, being around this community who, like I said, Didn't that know all my background and my history will have a kind of high school athlete or was or what kind of student I wasn't college, they just knew me for me and who I was showing them and so that really set me up I feel like for where I am now. And that kind of got me in the right path.   Michael Hingson ** 19:55 what did that teach you being out there?   Cartwright Morris ** 19:58 With it. Thank you It really taught me how to do myself from an inside out approach. You know, Stephen Covey's got to talks a lot about this, that this, this belief, it's got us to everything, living our life and this conviction, starting from that as who I am and presenting that. And if it's not accepted, it's not we don't get angry, we don't throw judgment. We don't it's but we continually to discover and learn in any situations. And, and we can't, if it's like building that lifestyle from that place of inside out. And you really start living in truth, you start living in that place where you're you're not trying to be, you're not approaching life to be accepted. Acceptance is beautiful, I think all human beings, we need that we need that and be unconditionally loved. But I think we need that in the context of, hey, let me bring myself to the table and not try to adjust according to culture, I think I was a very good chameleon, I think I could perform and do little things just to fit in just to be right to make people laugh. And when you didn't have a positive response of me, I, you know, went into myself and beat myself up and judged myself and created a lifestyle where I think there's a lot of low grade anxiety that I was dealing with. That then led to me really not valuing what I had to bring others. And so I think really starting to live that inside out and valuing what I had to offer, I can really live in community holistically, and I could really add value, and I could then learn from my mistakes from my failures and not be crumble, you know, be destroyed by them, because I was really just learning more about what was inside me. So.   Michael Hingson ** 22:02 So you started really gaining some self confidence and learning self worth?   Cartwright Morris ** 22:06 Absolutely. 100%. Yeah.   Michael Hingson ** 22:09 So how long were you at the ranch in Atlanta.   Cartwright Morris ** 22:13 So I was I was there for really four months. And then I came back and the Oregon to my hometown, where more disorganization actually had a home base in Alabama. And so I continue to work with them on and off for the next four or five years. And was there it was in California, they actually had part of the organization was in Israel in the West Bank, I got to travel there and experience new cultures and be around just different people and as exposed to living in California where I met a lot of different people from different parts of the world and really expanded my worldview and helped me really see understand people, I think that's where I really started become a student of people, I really got so fascinated by people, just my natural curiosity through just being in the outdoors in California and, and out in the west, whereas kid, I used to love westerns, I used to love mountains and adventure and I got to kind of explore that, you know, living out there and being out there and but then it really and that other curiosity of just people understanding people where they come from different backgrounds where, you know, I just, you know, grew up in, you know, Birmingham, Alabama, and the Bible Belt, where things were kind of necessarily always rigid, but it was definitely the out, I lived in kind of a bubble. And that's an echo chamber, and I got to hear different perspectives and belief systems or worldviews, and it really helped me, if anything, just gain more empathy for others understand their point of view, but also reinforce, you know, what I believe in my convictions about this life and all that. And so it was, it was, it ended up being really fun. I always say with like, you know, the older you get, you know, I think as a young man, I think you think you know everything about everything. And you got all these convictions, you become pretty dogmatic and rigid of what you think is right. And, and they're pretty broad. But the older you get, those things start shrinking, and you start having less and less, but those things that have become less and less of your convictions you become they become more real and true. And you can base so much of your life on and you become everything else you become pretty open to and honest. And it actually becomes more fun to be around others and talk about these certain issues that you used to be just so rigid on.   Michael Hingson ** 24:50 I hear you and so you worked with that organization for a while and then Then what did you do? You obviously left that at some point.   Cartwright Morris ** 24:58 Yeah, so that led some me moving. You know, I really think this is a common thing in my life. I think this is a very much. It's why I resonate so much with Joseph Campbell's hero's journey. It was, but I really felt when I was leaving that organization and the middle of 2015. I was like, Am I like, I could go anywhere, I could do anything. I'm excited. Um, and just don't get sent me back home. I don't want to I don't want to be back in Birmingham, Alabama. Yeah, and I was. But it was interesting, this job opportunity opened up where I really, it's interesting, my heart really went out. And built all these life experiences I developed all I felt like these coaching skills and these ability to really help men in business and sales really go through the process that I went through in my 20s, and, you know, early 30s, to really help them apply some of these things in their business world. And I really felt a heart for the men that I knew in the city. And that's where my biggest network was. And that was, and so that really opened the door to work for this nonprofit organization here in Birmingham, Alabama, the Center for executive leadership, and it was. Yeah, and it was just man, the door kind of flung open and that move back here and work for that organization for six years and really hone my skills developed more of a business side being even a being in the nonprofit space. really helped me kind of figure out more and more of how do I actually add value to others? How do I really do this on a on a bigger scale than just, you know, in my community, but actually do it in a way that's helping those who may not even know where who I am? And so that's what ventually led me back to Birmingham? Yeah.   Michael Hingson ** 27:01 Well, and along the way, you also found a partner?   Cartwright Morris ** 27:07 I did, I did. Oh, it's funny, I was single. For a long time. You know. I was that's, you know, going back to my story, what I said earlier, Michael, of just outside, living outside in, I think that's another reason why I led me to this ranch, the ranch that I went to in California was you, you're in your mid 20s. And in the south, this is a very common thing as people are getting married. 2223 right out of college, and a lot of my friends were in their starting careers and building success in creating families and having kids and but for whatever reason, I couldn't find that person I wanted to spend the rest of my life with and it became frustrating you, you really do feel very exposed in a world where you know, everyone you know, is married, and, you know, any single person who resonates with that gets that and it can be difficult. But the person I end up finding, I wouldn't trade it for the world and kind of came from a place where I didn't, I never thought it would was a dating app. You know. And which is crazy story was I am a few years older, and my wife and she was she had, you know, Michael, I don't know if you know anything about these dating apps, which is funny. But it's the to put an age range. And she had her age range was like 28 to 34. And two weeks before my 36th birthday, she bumped it up to 28 to 35. And so I fit into that, and we met in two weeks before my 36th birthday. And we met and about a little over a year later, we were married. And man and I couldn't imagine anybody else. We're having a blast and loving life and hoping to have a kid on the way soon. So yeah,   Michael Hingson ** 29:15 my wife and I got married later than most people 32 and 33 years and as we always said, and we lived together for 40 years until she passed last November. But what we both always said and I still say is we were old enough that we really knew what we wanted in a person. And it wasn't something that was arrogance or whatever, but it's just out of maturity. We knew what we thought would be the kind of person that we could get along with. And not from a dating app. But one day, we were introduced by a common friend. And he and she and I And someone I was actually dating at the time went out to dinner. And I sat across from my future wife not knowing that was going to be the case. And the other two, were talking and we just hit it off. And then my friend moved. And so can Karen. And the friend that that we had in common. We're in touch. But he said, You know that I had my my friend had left. And suddenly I'm talking to Karen. This was in 1982. So I met her at the end of January. And by March, we were talking some. And then I went to Hawaii, with my parents in May of 82. And I was going to do some sales work over there. And I wanted to take them, they had never been to Hawaii. And Karen was traveling, and she did the the ticketing and all that. And the bottom line is, I called her twice from Hawaii every day. We were over there. And we were married in November of 1982.   Cartwright Morris ** 31:04 Oh, wow. That's great.   Michael Hingson ** 31:07 Yeah, as I said, we really knew what we wanted, or we thought we did. And I guess we were right, because we hit it off. And we were married for 40 years until she passed. So it was really a good marriage. And, and you know what it's like now, being married now for a little more than a year, you know, how you feed off each other? And you you enhance each other? A lot?   Cartwright Morris ** 31:29 Yeah. And I would say and what, for me what it's interesting, you hear this was so you know, I think being part of a good group of men and your life and have that your life, you hear the stories of their marriage life, and you kind of go, Okay, how would I handle that situation? And how would I want to be married to somebody who reacts in that way. And so that, like, to your point, I kind of understood more of what I wanted, and was able to, even in the dating process, kind of, I don't want to say throw out, like, you know, testing, like it was an exam, but there was definitely moments where I wanted to see how she reacted in certain situations. And   Michael Hingson ** 32:12 I'm sure that went both ways. Yeah.   Cartwright Morris ** 32:15 100%. And really find out if I'm marrying a mature person who values life that has the same interest as well as values. And, and we that's what we found. And so, yeah, so it's, yeah, it's been fun. It's interesting. It's in you, right, and it's never gonna be perfect. But that's the I think that's the joy. Right? Yeah. When it's, you know, you kind of figure it out together. So, and you want to be able to be with someone who is willing to do that, that's not just projecting some expectation onto you, and is willing to kind of just and build and go from there   Michael Hingson ** 32:51 and grow together. So you gained a lot of self confidence. So what, what's the difference between confidence and arrogance, because projecting confidence and truly being confident, I can see some people saying, well, you're just arrogant.   Cartwright Morris ** 33:10 See, I would say a lot of my life was trying to project myself as not being arrogant. But that's not necessarily confident either. I think that's it might, I would say the big difference between arrogance and confidence is arrogance is really trying to hide an insecurity. There's something you're trying to give provato you're trying to give an image that is hiding something that you're afraid someone's going to find out, where confidence is built on humility, you are 100% aware of what you're not, that you, maybe not 100%, but you are aware of what you're not. And you're okay with it. You're not trying to hide it. Like you are what like you're, you know, what you're good at, you're confident and that in the things that you're not you are willing to accept, to value that and other people were arrogant people, if there's something they're not good at, they will you know, they will be territorial in a way to others who are good at it, they will be feel insecure, they will feel a level of almost, what's the word? I'm looking at a scarcity mindset where like, you can't be good at that. Because I have to be I have to be known for that where confident people are good with other people that are good at what they do. And I think that's, that's a lot of what confidence we have to really think about that. It's grounded in humility. And you it's almost like holding two truths at once. You know, when people are, yeah, go ahead, Michael.   Michael Hingson ** 34:47 And the other part about it is it's it's not just the issue of humility, but even if somebody is better at doing what you do. If you're a competent person, then You look at it from the standpoint of, wow, this guy is great or this woman is great, what can I learn? And how do I learn to do some of those things? And do that, from a humble and curious standpoint rather than something where it's it's not humble, but rather, how do I show that person up?   Cartwright Morris ** 35:22 Yes, yes. Yeah. And that's, and that's where I think you go back to the outside in. I mean, we the scarcity mindset versus a more holistic mindset of, hey, we're doing this all together. And I think that truly confident people like being around other confident people earring and people don't like being around confident people. Right? They are. They're threatened by them.   Michael Hingson ** 35:45 Right? So how do you tell the difference? I think you're sort of alluding to it. But how do you tell the difference between someone who is truly self confident? And somebody who's just plain arrogant?   Cartwright Morris ** 35:58 Yeah. Well, generally, you can kind of get an idea and being around them. Like, I mean, I just think like, going back to just I liked the idea that just a lot of arrogant people there is there there's a you could feel they're threatened by other people. There's a scarcity mindset, there's a insecurity. And their outlets say that you we can all sense the difference between insecurity and humility, that there's a fear based mindset, there's a there's an anxiety in the atmosphere is probably the best word versus a humble person, they're present. They're there with you. You know, at depends on a lot of different situations. But you can just feel there's a level of maturity, a willingness to engage others, versus protect yourself from others. And so I think just especially like in a business concept, I mean, or even in, say, like a, say, like someone in sales that's trying to present an image that they're not, versus someone who's just confident in being who they are, where they're at. And I think that's something that that is generally can be summed up in my mind by just the presence of way they act, whether one's fear base versus one is presence based.   Michael Hingson ** 37:25 And like, what you just said about engaging yourself with others, as opposed to protecting yourself from others. How true?   Cartwright Morris ** 37:36 Yes, most of us Yeah, are very, it's really strange. And it takes a lot of hard work to get to that point, because I think a lot of us do grow in environments where it's it. You know, my favorite quote of any movie are sorry, show recent shows Ted lasso, he talks about, be, be curious, not judgmental, right. I think that mindset of like, we immediately judge people that are different that and so like that, we try to protect ourselves from them.   Michael Hingson ** 38:11 Yeah, and we've got to get away from the whole idea of being judgmental, there's no, there's no value in it really. And the other part about it, and I talk about trusts a lot is that it's like being open to trust. The difference between us and dogs is dogs generally are open to trust, they don't trust unconditionally, they do. I think love unconditionally, I think it's in their nature. But they don't trust unconditionally, but they are open to trust, unless something horrible is really happened to them. And the difference is, we tend not to be because we've been brought up in so many ways to think everybody's got their own agenda, and how can I trust this person? I'm not going to trust I'm going to build a wall, rather than exploring. Is there a way I can develop a relationship and a trusting relationship with this person? And the answer is, maybe there is, maybe there isn't. But you'll never know until you try with the idea that you leave yourself open to the idea of trust, anyway, somebody will earn your trust or they won't. And likewise, you will. You will earn their trust, and they'll earn your trust or that won't happen. And then that's a different story. But you've got to start somewhere.   Cartwright Morris ** 39:35 100% And, yeah, it's it's, I mean, I think you've always got to be willing to ask those questions or so why am I not willing to trust it's a valuable thing probably the one of the more valuable things in this life. I think you're right, like we all generally should, you know, should openly love others but the desire to trust one another is built, but you have to start with The willingness to have like, hey, if I really want to be in relation to this person, if I really want to build a business with someone or build a marriage, or there has to be some level of trust created, and what do I have to put aside to really, you know, build that?   Michael Hingson ** 40:16 How do we build competence and create confidence for our lives?   Cartwright Morris ** 40:21 How do we build confidence, create confidence? So I think it's going back to what a little bit what I just said is, you know, going back to my athletics background of like, watching film tape, right. I mean, that I would say, the first thing that's the obvious is, you got to do hard things, you got to be willing to do hard things, whether that's by choice, or hard things happen to you in life, like we all that's going to happen. I mean, as you know, Michael, like this is just this is, these are the things that are going to build confidence, but to really, to gain confidence in your life you had to on a consistent basis, you have to learn to do hard things. Well, how do we do hard things? Well, and I would say like, it's going back to my athletic start with evaluating how do I evaluate my thoughts and emotions? On a regular basis? Like how do i When at any given situation, I would say any competent person, great leader, top performer, I know, has the ability to really do this at a higher high speed. In their mind, when they go through something hard, they experience a negative emotion or a negative thought, they're able to process they have a filter to which they see the world, this is going back to what we talked about trust that generally, people struggle to get trust, they have a filter of how they see the world that everyone's out to get me. Right. And I think sometimes we have to continue to evaluate our filter, and process these things. Because that's how when we do hard things, when we go through something negative, we're able to adjust, I would say that's what I say, you know, when I experienced a negative emotion, you know, over 10 years ago, it was, I would become, like I said, navel gazing, I would look inward, I would shut down, I would collapse. And I wasn't willing to announce of trying to avoid those negative emotions versus like, I needed to evaluate it understand my thoughts and feelings, what was going on to actually grow and learn and, and so that's why we say start with evaluation, then there's, from there, that's clarifying your strengths and weaknesses, you really have to clarify, let's go back to humility thing, learning to really know what you're good at and know what you're not. I think that's a real confident person is very aware of both of those things. I would say that's a big part of my journey. I think some people hate personality tests, but to me, they've become really helpful because it's helped me understand myself, and not feel that constant anxiety to try to be someone I'm not. And I think it's allowed me to be more confident, show up more and be myself. And then I think the last thing is really important is always like says you got to learn to act boldly, from what you've learned from evaluating, clarifying. I always say Boldness is like your is courage, his little brother, it's real intense, real fast, not really sure where he's going, but you gotta be willing to act boldly, I think a lot of confidence follows those are willing to act boldly to be bold in their in their decision making to, to see forward movement, or not focused on the results. I think we've hit on that a little bit, Michael, especially with Edie, you know, like we talked about test taking comes all about making the test. It does not about the process. I think, people that won't be bold in the process, really not focused solely on the result. I think confident people really, they know good results are coming. So they're not focused on it. Because they know they can learn from failure. They can learn from hardship, they can learn from disappointment, they can learn from even pain and change. Like there's these constant things in our life that hard things are calm, but when we're really willing to evaluating, clarifying and then acting from them, we really can gain confidence in just about anything, whether that's in our relationships, or at work career, or just in life in general.   Michael Hingson ** 44:19 How do you define bold, you talk about acting boldly. What does that really mean?   Cartwright Morris ** 44:25 It Yeah, yeah, it's just I think, boldness is really willing to just step out outside your comfort zone. I'm trying to think who created it but the whole idea of here's our comfort zone, and then outside of it is growth, right? And then way outside of this panic, I think it's willing to step outside that comfort zone of your life that here, you know, you're not, you're not going to really gain confidence by being on the sideline by being comfortable by being safe. By doing things like you've always done it. It'll be like everybody else. I think bold people, confident people at you know, they act boldly by doing something that's a little bit uncomfortable. That's a little bit unknown. That's a little bit. That's why I always say life is, you know about adventure, I think we have to take that mindset. Be willing to just kind of play a little bit have a little fun. You know, Mike, I think this is really interesting, because I've thought of this the other day, because I watched the documentary, The rescue, about the 13 boys in Thailand who got stuck in the cave, right? And how, you know, they had trained Thai Navy SEALs, they had these people, they're extremely disciplined knew how to dive trained. This is their area of expertise and their job and their, and they struggled to figure out how to find the boys and rescue the boys and you they needed these men who basically do this as a hobby to rescue these boys like this is like what really Chet like, allow those boys to be rescued is where they realized is they needed the weekend or cave diver, the guy who does this for fun, who is willing to go into dark caves, wearing a mask and a snorkel and who has navigated this for the fun of it, I think is going back to what we said about adventure and play like these people willing in their free time and fun to do these crazy uncomfortable things. Because of the curiosity because of the adventure because of the fun, and I think And so that led to their expertise by just living life that way, doing something that allowed them to actually be experts in rescuing 13 boys that, you know, is a story that spread all over the world. And now, you know, I think there's a movie and a documentary about it. And and I think that really, when it comes to finding boldness, is that it's just the willingness to step out of your comfort zone, out of curiosity, and the desire to be better to explore, to, even to the past of having fun, I think everything I've done is fun is is is not all, you know, it's never really come out of my comfort zone. Yeah.   Michael Hingson ** 47:31 Well, the other part about all of that, is that when you are like the weekend diver, they're also more relaxed. Yeah, then they know more of what they're doing. Or they go into it with a confidence, as opposed to just a discipline like a seal diver or something like that, who may very well have good competence. But the weekend diver who goes in there comes from a different point of view. And there's value for that.   Cartwright Morris ** 48:03 Yes, 100%. And,   Michael Hingson ** 48:05 you know, talking about the whole idea of leaders and leadership, I think that true leaders do have a lot more confidence and a lot less arrogance, and some of their competence also helps them recognize maybe someone can do this particular job better than I and I'm going to let them do that. Because as the leader of the group, I'm responsible for the group being successful. And that means knowing other people's skills and recognizing when they may be able to take the lead, and get the job done better or help us all get the job done better.   Cartwright Morris ** 48:45 Yes, absolutely. Yeah.   Michael Hingson ** 48:49 So one of the things that strikes me as a relevant question is, why is it important to find the right people to gain confidence because you can meet a lot of people, but some are going to teach you more and truly help you more than others. So when you're really looking at it, why is it important to find the right people? And how do we do that?   Cartwright Morris ** 49:10 Yeah. I mean, that's, you know, that's, I would say, that's probably a lot of people out there like, yeah, how do I find those people? That is the hard part, right? I think, finding similar values and interests similar like way I was looking for a wife, but I would say when we start acting boldly and we start really understanding more of ourselves through evaluating and clarifying and then we act like we need to be around the right people that reinforce all that's happening into us. I think that's the beauty of being in a great network, a good community. Working in a in a healthy work environment is when we start really gaining confidence. We got people going, alright, you're on the right track. I love in my you know, men's cohort, my leadership cohort is really fun, because I always say I'm limited in my expertise. But also when you get a group of leaders in a on a zoom call or in the room and they start adding value to other people, and other person goes, Wow, that I needed to hear that, or that really resonated or that that really spoke to me, this person who gave it goes, Oh, wow, maybe I am on the right track, I'm gaining confidence in my voice, I'm gaining confidence, my actions and even my thought process. And so I think, you know, it's hard to really gain confidence on island, you know, I think that's where, when we really see where we're adding value from all that we're doing on, you know, internally and on the side, and that understand going through these situations, doing hard things, and understanding ourselves in it, and then acting more boldly from it, then getting the reinforcement from a, like I said, a community network or work environment really creates. Yeah, helps us gain confidence. I think also, the other piece of it is, is really being challenged, you know, I think that's something that's really helped me just, bro is just being around great people, I think you really, or end up in silos of just poor thinking and, you know, little action, you know, we end up saying the same, but when we get around people who are willing to, to work hard, do things differently, think differently, you know, it automatically, you know, by osmosis challenges us to do the same. And it's hard to stay the same. And you really have to go, Alright, how do I level up here, I don't perform at a higher level. And I think that generally reinforces confidence. And sometimes, you know, we, yeah, that happens that way.   Michael Hingson ** 51:59 I love the phrase, you said, it's hard to find confidence on an island. We're all together. And we, we really can learn a lot more. When we're around other people, even if they don't know they're teaching us if we open our minds to being willing to be taught or shown. I do believe that we're our own best teachers, but we have to be open to learning. And so I love that that phrase, it's hard to find competence on an island. I think that's great. Which is, which is really pretty cool. But you have clearly demonstrated the value of life being an adventurer, in a lot of different ways. Do you still work with executive leadership? Or are you out on your own now?   Cartwright Morris ** 52:48 No, I started my own coaching business, actually, this time last year? Yeah. So I'm doing Yeah. Coaching executives and sales professionals here in Birmingham, and, and some remotely? And yeah, I've been doing that for almost a year now. So   Michael Hingson ** 53:07 tell us more about all that. What, what you do? What's the the organization called? And all that sort of stuff?   Cartwright Morris ** 53:14 Yeah, so it's just J cart, right? Coaching. The J is my first name and who I'm named after my dad and my granddad. So it's a little bit of a nod to them, and their business acumen. But yeah, so I've been coached. So I really my coaching program is three months, it's kind of we go through that process of gaining confidence. And in my Men's cohort, so each beginning each month, we really talk through you know, a lot of these big issues, these kind of overarching content, and, and but then we really start getting into Alright, how's this resonating with you? How do you really walk this through, and that's what we do in my, your offer two coaching sessions in this coaching program, where we really start problem solving. All right, what are you going through, because I always say, like, leading and sales, you know, especially, like, these are hard things to do. These are not easy. That's what I like, I always say, like, Dang conference, you got to get to do hard things. So to do it, but you got to learn how to do them well, and so really, how do I help you in the midst of some of the hard things you're doing in your job and even at home? And it's funny, Michael, you know, we talked a little bit on marriage and it's some of my clients, what ends up happening is they come in for professional and help and later, you know, in some of their managerial stuff and ends up we end up talking a lot about their marriage, which is funny. So, but yeah, that's a lot of you know, that's what I do is really just a men's cohort with coaching on a monthly basis. And then really, yeah, I've created even just from from that a keynote that I love to, you know, speak to sales teams and help them out and and To create momentum and just in be a level of solution to problems in in specially in the sales world, which is just not an easy man, you know, I would say it's not easy, but I'm someone who loves autonomy, you know, it's probably the best place the best career path you can take. So   Michael Hingson ** 55:23 how would you define success today?   Cartwright Morris ** 55:27 Well, that's where I say it's changes. I think that's where I think we all have to wake up every morning, go. Alright, what does success look like today? I think sometimes, I mean, we go I mean, I keep coming back to my story, which I'm glad you got me to tell him I. It, it, I would say I wanted I was a square peg trying to fit in a round hole. I just desperately wanted to be this line of success, the rest of my life show up, be this person and fit in and everyone accepts me and feel successful. And I think that's just that's a very poor way to define success. And I think success has to be defined. By really, I mean, really kind of just growth it has to where every day am I learning? Am I becoming a better person? Am I connecting with people? Am I learning about people learning about becoming more self aware? And perfecting not only silly, perfect things I think perfect can be miscued, as well as, what am I really growing in excellence in my craft? And I would say Yeah, so I would say it's it for the most part. It's it's subjective. And but obviously, you know, it could change per year, it could change per month, it could change per day. But I think we're when really we learn how to find that for ourselves to our unique personalities, our unique gifting our unique, even career path and interests. That's sometimes we just at a young age, decide this is the only thing that's going to be successful, and we force it and then wake up, you know, in our middle age and feel angry, depressed and disappointed with the life that we have. I think there's a reason why it's because we've just been unwilling to adjust to define success, according to really what the day holds. So a   Michael Hingson ** 57:25 lot to be said for self analysis on a daily basis, isn't there?   Cartwright Morris ** 57:29 Absolutely. Reflection is so underrated. Underrated. Yes, I would say a lot of great leaders that I know are just they have the ability to reflect really well.   Michael Hingson ** 57:40 You talked a lot about sales and salespeople, what kind of advantages do you think salespeople actually have in terms in their personalities over the personalities of other professionals who are not salespeople?   Cartwright Morris ** 57:55 Yeah, you know, it's hard it is. You know, I think there is a desire to understand people I think you almost got to be an expert at people to be really good sales because you're gonna walk into any room and who you're selling to is going to be very different resonate if you try to come in and be big, gregarious person, which I think generally sales people are, they kind of can be extroverted. Real relational, have the ability to communicate at a high level, which are good things, but I think sometimes if we force those issues, or force ourselves on to say, this is not always going to work for the same people, so I think really, that learning to be a student of human beings and understand them and their needs, and really what I also is, you know, obviously this is any profession is really in sales you're trying to be whether you're, you know, a business owner or even just working for a company, as I say, in sales, you really have to be solution focused, how do I provide a solution for this person, for this company? For this business, am I offering that and that's where, you know, I think many people of all, I think every human being maybe has had a bad experience with the sales guy, where it felt salesy pushy, gross manipulative were here but over here like you really can we can you can also be a salesperson that's really wanting to add value and solutions for that and that really frees you up to show up and kind of be in a place where you're don't necessarily have to be all things all people or lets you frees you up to go the next next person go hey, thank you for the time and you continue to build a relationship and network but you can kind of move on and yeah, really continued. Continue doing your job. You But you have to be resilient. I think that's another thing. Michael, as you're, as I'm talking here is the willingness to deal with failure, I think there's a lot of jobs where fit like failure, like as an engineer, oh, my goodness, it was funny, I was on the driving range the other day, and somebody I had a golf driving range, and somebody hit a bad shot on the driving range you get, and they go, he turned to me, he goes, You know, every time I hit one of those, I'm just thankful I'm not not my operating room. Oh, it's like that mindset, like, failure is hard. And a lot of other professions. Like, being a surgeon or engineer, where versus in sales, it's like you have to be, it's almost like a baseball player where, you know, over, you know, over a third of the time, you're gonna fail. And you have to be willing to kind of build that resilience, understand yourself, and, you know, continue to gain confidence and be an expert, your craft and be more relational and solution or focus versus results. And me focused.   Michael Hingson ** 1:01:01 I would say also, that it isn't necessarily that a third of the time you fail. A third of the time, it may not go the way you planned, but the other side of it is, how do you embrace that? And how do you help the customer? I've had times that I've sold products, or tried to sell products, that would not work in my customer situations, and my bosses would regard those as failures. Why didn't you know what sooner? Well, there were strategies as to why. And maybe I couldn't possibly have but the other side of it is, I can also tell my customers, this is what will work for you. And that has turned into successes later on. Because we build trust. Tell me about the the concept of men are forged.   Cartwright Morris ** 1:01:46 So yeah, this is was a podcast I started and man, when was that? That was three, four years ago. Wow. It's crazy. And it really, it's just the mindset that I had to take on a lot of the stuff we've been talking about, Michael is the whole idea that life we are forged in life, whether things happen to us, or we choose to do something that these are things building us, shaping us, molding us. And we have to be willing to embrace that the whole you know, forging the definition of Forge right with it's obviously there's two definitions, right? There's like a forged check. There's the fraudulent that is portraying to present yourself as something you're not. And then there's the forged as an being molded and shaped by heat in hammering the hard things in life. And so that's where that concept kind of came from the mindset that I wanted to really take on, I didn't want to be the son, I was trying to present ourselves as something I was not. But I really wanted to embrace some of the more hard things, I avoided them for so long. And that led to really create a podcast, how do I encourage other men to do this, because I just saw this growing need that men had a similar mindset that I used to have, of just kind of passively going through life. And I think it really comes down to a lot of this, Michael, and I don't know if you felt this in your upbringing, but I feel like less and less, and maybe it's a western culture thing of there's just less and less of a rite of passage for men. You know, it's, it's very passive. It's not direct. It's not a older man coming alongside you. And, you know, we generally kind of have passive ways to looking at what manhood is now. And, and, yeah, part of me wanted to really kind of start creating content around that. And that's kind of why I started the podcast and interviewing some of these leaders and men in that I respect and admire and kind of get some of their wisdom and a lot of these areas.   Michael Hingson ** 1:03:49 Well, I think the whole idea of the decreasing rite of passage also comes from the standpoint of, we're not encouraging people to interact with each other. We're not encouraging people to have the, the tough or the relevant conversations. And so it does happen. Well, I've got to ask, do you ever deal with coaching women? I mean, our women are forged.   Cartwright Morris ** 1:04:13 Oh, I agree. I'm just one of those people. If you want to build a bridge, you got to start on your side, right? That's   Michael Hingson ** 1:04:18 true.   Cartwright Morris ** 1:04:21 Yeah, so I mean, I'm, I don't have any million coaching clients at the time, but I do coach women, I just, I am one of those people where I'm like, I'm not going to, I don't want to mansplain some of these concepts, and I just I empathize with the man. Right. And so that's why I chose men or Forge. And so it's definitely it's very true for all people.   Michael Hingson ** 1:04:45 Is the podcast still going on? It is yeah. So people can find you wherever podcasts are, are made available. That is cool. Well, if people want to reach out to you and learn about coaching that you do, and maybe see Are there ways you can help them and so on? How do they do that?   Cartwright Morris ** 1:05:02 So that you can go to Menareforged.com or cartwright-morris.com   Michael Hingson ** 1:05:08 and Morris are spelled   Cartwright Morris ** 1:05:11 sorry, yeah, Cartwright's, C A R T W R I G H T dash Morris, M O R R I S.com. Okay. And I mean, they're the same thing. It's, you know, either one. And so you really and I would say, go there, get on, get on my email list. And when you sign up for my email list, you get a video a little bit of about what I do, and you we can start a conversation from there. That's the probably the best way. But you know, when you find out more content about me, you're welcome to, you know, find me and reach out to me on LinkedIn.   Michael Hingson ** 1:05:46 Well, I hope people will do that. And I think that you've offered a lot of really relevant, interesting and poignant things for all of us to think about. And I hope that people will reach out to you and get a chance to know you better. And I certainly have enjoyed this in our previous conversation and want to do more of it. So we definitely need to stay in touch. And of course, if there's ever, any way we can be of help to you, you just let us know.   Cartwright Morris ** 1:06:14 Thank you, Michael. This is a blast coming on.   Michael Hingson ** 1:06:21   You have been listening to the Unstoppable Mindset podcast. Thanks for dropping by. I hope that you'll join us again next week, and in future weeks for upcoming episodes. To subscribe to our podcast and to learn about upcoming episodes, please visit www dot Michael hingson.com slash podcast. Michael Hingson is spelled m i c h a e l h i n g s o n. While you're on the site., please use the form there to recommend people who we ought to interview in upcoming editions of the show. And also, we ask you and urge you to invite your friends to join us in the future. If you know of any one or any organization needing a speaker for an event, please email me at speaker at Michael hingson.com. I appreciate it very much. To learn more about the concept of blinded by fear, plea

Papers Read on AI
On the Benefits of 3D Pose and Tracking for Human Action Recognition

Papers Read on AI

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 23, 2023 30:25


In this work we study the benefits of using tracking and 3D poses for action recognition. To achieve this, we take the Lagrangian view on analysing actions over a trajectory of human motion rather than at a fixed point in space. Taking this stand allows us to use the tracklets of people to predict their actions. In this spirit, first we show the benefits of using 3D pose to infer actions, and study person-person interactions. Subsequently, we propose a Lagrangian Action Recognition model by fusing 3D pose and contextualized appearance over tracklets. To this end, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the AVA v2.2 dataset on both pose only settings and on standard benchmark settings. When reasoning about the action using only pose cues, our pose model achieves +10.0 mAP gain over the corresponding state-of-the-art while our fused model has a gain of +2.8 mAP over the best state-of-the-art model. Code and results are available at: https://brjathu.github.io/LART 2023: Jathushan Rajasegaran, G. Pavlakos, Angjoo Kanazawa, Christoph Feichtenhofer, J. Malik https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01199v1.pdf

Faster, Please! — The Podcast

If humanity is to become a multi-planetary species, we can't forever remain dependent on Earth's resources. That's where space resource extraction comes in. So how would space mining work, what problems would it solve, and how long will we have to wait? To answer those questions, I'm joined in this episode by Kevin Cannon. Kevin is a professor of space resources and geology and geological engineering at Colorado School of Mines in Golden, Colorado. He's also author of the Planetary Intelligence newsletter on Substack.In This Episode* How mining in space could benefit Earth (1:13)* The basic economics of space mining (3:56)* Space resources and multi-planetary civilization (9:32)* Public and private sector space exploitation (14:00)* The next steps for space resource extraction (17:56)* The criticisms and hurdles facing space mining (26:15)Below is an edited transcript of our conversation.How mining in space could benefit EarthJames Pethokoukis: You've written that building a space-based civilization is all about raw materials. Given your academic specialty, these are raw materials out there, not down here. But if I am not interested in building a space-based civilization, do I care what's out there, what materials, what elements I can find out there?Kevin Cannon: Let me give you two examples of how this could kind of come back to Earth. One is something that's being talked about increasingly lately, and that's this idea of space-based solar power. We want to undergo this energy transition, switch to renewables. Solar power, the issue there is the scaling and the land that's available. You only have so much land that you can put up more solar panels on. So if we wanted to have a truly energy-abundant future, one way to do that is to actually put up structures, satellites, in orbit that collect solar power and beam it back to the Earth via microwaves. And it turns out the only way to really make this economic is to actually make those structures out of raw materials that are found in space, either from the Moon or from asteroids. If you try to launch everything that you need, it's just too expensive. It's too difficult. So that's one example.A second example related to that, there's obviously a lot of talk about climate in general, and there's still this idea out there that we can get through this climate issue by just reducing emissions. I think at a higher level, the discussions out there are that that's not going to be enough, that we're not drawing down those emissions fast enough, and that we may need to use different geoengineering techniques. There are different ways to do that. You can inject stuff into the atmosphere. You can put stuff into the ocean. Those are a little bit problematic politically. One alternative is to actually just block out a small fraction of the sun's radiation with something called a planetary sun shade. You put up a structure in space at the L-1, the Lagrangian point between the sun and the Earth, and that structure blocks out, say, 1 to 2 percent of the sunlight and cools the planet and helps as a mitigation effort. And again, that structure is so large that we could not possibly launch that into the space. We would have to build that out of materials that we find. So even if you don't want to leave the Earth, you're happy here, you still have problems on Earth. And there are solutions to those that could potentially be found by using raw material on the Moon or on asteroids.The basic economics of space miningYou're saying that even with the decline we've seen in launch costs in recent years, and even assuming some continued progress, it would be more affordable to build these two examples with the regolith — or the surface dirt from the Moon or Mars or from some other place, some asteroid — than just getting it out into space with a rocket, even if it's a rocket that goes up pretty cheaply compared to the rockets of the past.The thing you have to understand is that as those launch costs come down, it also becomes cheaper to put the factory on the Moon that makes the components, that assembles the structure in space. And it's also the case that we wouldn't build 100 percent of the structure. You would still be launching the intricate parts, the dopants for your solar panels, the wiring, things like that. It's kind of the bulk structure that we would make, what we call the “dumb mass” as opposed to the “smart mass.” But yes, as the launch costs come down, it's easier to put things in orbit, but it's also easier to put construction material and assembly material to do this kind of space-based construction effort.That's always the big concern: trying to make the economics work. I find that people aren't fully aware of what possibilities have been opened up because it's gotten a lot cheaper to launch rockets into space. And hopefully it will get a bit cheaper still.We're anticipating right now in the months ahead, the first orbital launch of the SpaceX Starship. SpaceX has brought the launch costs down dramatically just with the Falcon 9, through reuse, through the Falcon Heavy. But the possibility for Starship is really a step function. It's not just a continuation of that smooth decline, but really a potential leap in our ability to put massive amounts of stuff into space. If that design is proved out, then hopefully other competitors will start to copy that and improve on it and we'll see an even more dramatic reduction.People have a hard time understanding the economics of going and mining an asteroid to bring back to build things on Earth. Would that be economical versus using that material to build things out in space?There's only a very narrow case you could make for a certain class of materials. And specifically, that would be things like the platinum-group metals. Those meet a number of criteria: They're very expensive — for example, the metal rhodium sells for about $400,000 per kilogram — and we only mine a very small amount of those per year. It's measured in single-digit or double-digit tons: 20 or 30 tons of these materials per year. Possibly, you could make an economic case to bring back some of those platinum-group metals. But for something like copper, we mine millions of tons per year, and that's never going to make sense. That's kind of the big misnomer about space resources that's out there in the public perception: that what we're talking about is going out into space and bringing stuff back and selling it into existing commodity markets. And that's really not what the main focus is. The main focus is using local materials that we find to help expand civilization into space rather than bringing everything with us. But maybe, just maybe, you could make a case for something like some of these platinum-group metals.What you're doing is not speculative. This is something that you think will have practical application and you're graduating students who are getting hired to begin to think and do this, right?It's still in the early stages, but it's not science fiction and it's not theoretical. Let me give you a couple examples of what's been happening in the last few years. Last year on Mars, there's a small instrument on board the Mars Perseverance rover, the NASA rover, called MOXIE. And this is a demonstration that sucks up a little bit of the CO2 atmosphere of Mars and converts it into breathable oxygen. This is the first time in history we've taken a raw material on another planetary body and actually turned it into a valuable product. It's the first creation of a resource in space.Second example: A couple months ago, we had the launch of a private lander from the company ispace. This is going to be the first attempt at a commercial landing on the Moon. And as part of that mission, they're going to try to scoop up a small amount of the regolith. And NASA has already signed a contract to purchase that material. It's a very small dollar amount. The real point of that is to set a precedent that if you go out and mine material in space, that it is yours to then sell to someone else. So if that's successful, around April that will be the first sale of a resource in outer space. There are a wide variety of companies working on this. We have the Space Resources Program at Colorado School of Mines. And just an example there, Blue Origin — not a lot of people know about this — in the past year or so they've hired about 30 full-time employees working just on space resources [in situ resource utilization].Space resources and multi-planetary civilizationAs you've been talking, I've been trying to quickly dig up a quote from one of my favorite books and TV shows, The Expanse, which touches on this issue of the resources out there. Let me just quickly read it to you: “Platinum, iron, and titanium from the Belt. Water from Saturn, vegetables and beef from the big mirror-fed greenhouses on Ganymede and Europa, organics from Earth and Mars. Power cells from Io, Helium-3 from the refineries on Rhea and Iapetus. A river of wealth and power unrivaled in human history came through Ceres.” That's the big sci-fi dream, that there is this vast field of resources out there that we can tap into. And if we can tap into it, it will be primarily for creating this space civilization.Yeah, that's exactly right. The atoms are out there. We know all of the atoms in the periodic table are found on every planetary body. It's a matter of concentration, and it's a matter of having the energy to separate those out and turn them into useful products. As long as we can figure out how to do that, then we have the resources available, just in the solar system, to support a massive population of people to live at a very high level of well-being. The long-term promise is that we can expand into space and have a thriving civilization that is built on top of those resources.I love how you put it in one of your tweets. You wrote, “Space resources are optional to gain a foothold in space, but necessary to gain a stronghold.”If you look back at what we've done so far in human space exploration, we've landed 12 people on the Moon, they walked around for a few days, and then they came back. Since then, we've sent people up to low-Earth orbit to the International Space Station or the Chinese equivalent. They stay up there for a few months, and they come back. In those cases, it makes sense to bring everything that you need with you: all the food, all the water, all the oxygen. If we have greater ambitions than that, though — if we want to not just walk around on the Moon, but have a permanent installation, we want to start growing a city on Mars that becomes self-sufficient, we want to have these O'Neill cylinders — you simply just can't launch that material with you. And that's because we live in this deep gravity well. We can just barely get these small payloads off the surface with chemical rockets. It just economically, physically does not make sense to try to bring everything with you if you have these larger ambitions. The only way to enable that kind of future is to make use of the material that you find when you get to your destination.The question I always get is, why bother doing any of this? Is that a question you spend a lot of time trying to answer? Or are you convinced it's going to happen and you've just moved beyond the question?I think enough people have made the case for why we need to do this. You can look at it from different perspectives, from one of scientific discovery to one of existential risk to the planet that, if we stay here on Earth, eventually something is going to come along that presents an existential risk to civilization. What I'm trying to do is work with the people, with the companies who are actually trying to do this and help them using my perspective, this kind of unique perspective that's based around the science and the composition of these planetary bodies and how to make use of these resources. I don't concern myself too much with the question of why we should do that. I'll kind of leave that to more of the philosophers, the other people who have worked on that. I agree that I'm kind of past that and I am really deep in the nitty-gritty details of how to actually do this: how to turn the regolith into metals and ceramics; how to get rocket propellant out of ice at the pools of the Moon. That's what I spend my time focused on.Public and private sector space exploitationThere was a boom in some planetary resource startups a few years ago which didn't last. What has changed between now and back then? Is it just the drop in launch costs? The technology has gotten better? Up until very recently, we had very low interest rates, it was easy to finance things? We're in like a second wave of this. What is making this second wave possible?I think the launch costs and technology do make a difference. I think the other thing is the way that some of these newer companies are going about it. That first wave that started back around 2012, you had these two main companies, Planetary Resources and Deep Space Industries, and they tried to do this as kind of a typical venture capital–funded endeavor where they went through their seed round, their series A, series B. And that's pretty difficult to do if you want a return on your investment in five to seven years. So what we're seeing lately are companies coming into this space who have already amassed a lot of capital. They might have founders or backers who have the money to actually put up missions without first raising capital.I think that's what's going to start to make more of a difference and make this second wave last and have longer legs. Some of the companies that are coming into this: I mentioned one, of course, Blue Origin with Jeff Bezos, who is pumping in about a billion dollars a year, very active in this space, not talking about it a lot publicly. But there are some newcomers that have also shown up in the last couple of years. One that we're working with is called KarmanPlus. They are a new asteroid mining company who are going to be setting up shop here in Colorado. They have the money upfront to be able to make a splash without having to go through the typical kind of VC funding route at the very beginning.How supportive is NASA of this general concept of seeing space as a resource to be extracted or exploited, whether it's to do things here on Earth or build a space civilization? Are they all on board? Do they view this as, “This is a private sector thing; we're going to focus on exploration and doing science, and this is a different thing and we really don't care”?NASA historically has always put a little bit of money into this field and the field of space resources. They have kept it going even as interest has waxed and waned. What they've never done, though, is made it a critical part of their missions. For example, right now they're working towards the Artemis program: landing people back on the surface of the Moon. They're exploring ideas of prospecting for ice at the poles of the Moon. They have this upcoming VIPER mission. They're funding technology to extract oxygen from the lunar regolith. But what they're not doing is saying the Artemis astronauts are going to breathe that oxygen and that's going to be a critical part of the Artemis program. So they're funding it; they're bringing it along. They are supporting it to some extent, but they're not making it a key part of their missions. I think what we're going to see is continued activity in the private sector. And then what we're also seeing, though, is a lot more interest lately from the Space Force and from DARPA. Those government agencies are starting to get a lot more interested in these topics.The next steps for space resource extractionWhen you think about this, what is the timeline that is reasonable using space resources to create a permanent base on the Moon, on Mars, to go further out and extract resources, not from the regolith on the Moon, but from actual asteroids and using those resources? What is your loose timeline of how you think about it? You don't have to give months and days and dates. But just broadly.Right now we're in the phase where we're testing and developing the technology in the laboratory space and then just starting to deploy it as these kind of demonstrations on the Moon or on Mars. I mentioned the MOXIE experiment converting the atmosphere of Mars into oxygen. In the next couple years, there are going to be a lot of these small commercial landers going to the Moon. A lot of those have demonstration payloads where they're going to do things like trying to 3D print with the regolith or trying to extract oxygen from it. The next step, I'd say maybe three to five years from now, is to get to the point where we have kind of a pilot plant. Maybe we're extracting water from the poles of the Moon or oxygen from the regolith and we have something a little bit bigger than these tiny experiments. So we'd have something like a pilot plant. Maybe 10 years out, we have full-scale production of a simple resource like rocket propellant. And then I think we're in maybe the 15- to 20-year time scale for starting some of those larger efforts: starting to land supplies on Mars that would go towards this city that SpaceX has talked about, starting to 3D print a structure on the Moon that would be a permanent installation. That's kind of the timeline that I think about.And then in terms of the investment part of this, there is another piece to this in that a lot of the companies who are working on these technologies also have a component of it that's focused on Earth-based technologies. One example is a company in Texas called ICON Technologies. Their main business is actually on Earth, and it's to 3D print entire houses to address the housing crisis. But then they also have a segment where they're applying those same techniques to be able to 3D print structures on the Moon or Mars. So for investors looking to get into this, there are a set of companies that have those shorter-horizon terrestrial applications, but then those also feed into these longer-term space-based goals.In 2019, you co-wrote a piece, “Feeding One Million People on Mars.” That would certainly qualify as a pretty large space colony. Can you briefly tell me how you would do that, and are we talking that being possible this century?The thing that I think a lot of people get wrong about the food piece of this is that they assume we're going to keep this paradigm that we've had for 10,000 years of growing our food in the dirt. There's a lot of work out there that's being done — it's not always very good quality — of, “Let's try to grow plants in the regolith. Let's add fertilizer to these fake regolith samples and try to grow plants.” And that's simply not very efficient. I think that as we go into space, we're going to abandon this idea of growing all of our food in dirt. I think it's going to be all through bioreactors, through cellular agriculture. I think that's kind of the main way that we're going to produce food in space.In terms of the logistics to do that on Mars, the challenge there is, let's say your end goal is you want a city with a million people on Mars — and that's what Elon has stated is kind of the end goal — the question is, how do you get there? And what you eventually want is for that city to be self-sustaining so that if the ships stopped coming from Earth, it would be able to persist. What you have to do is you have to transition from that city or that base making zero percent of the calories that are being consumed on Mars to eventually 100 percent. The challenge is figuring out how you scale from that zero to 100 percent. It's going to involve a massive number of ships that are sending supplies. But the question is, do you try to switch to being 100 percent self-sufficient at the beginning, or do you kind of slowly ramp up over time? That's kind of the main problem with the logistics: When do you stop sending the material from Earth and when do you send the machine that makes the material on Mars? That's a tricky problem.I would assume you were pretty happy to hear about this nuclear fusion breakthrough, because I doubt any of this really works, probably, unless you have nuclear fusion reactors?In space, there are some advantages to solar panels. If you are in orbit or on the Moon or near an asteroid, you don't have clouds, you don't have an atmosphere to attenuate the solar radiation. But I think, eventually, we are going to have to make that transition to something like fusion. People have talked about the potential for helium-3 on the Moon. I'm not 100 percent sold on that. There are other roots to get to fusion. But I think certainly that extra energy, that ability to scale the energy, really opens up the resources that are available. One thing we find is that on Earth we have a lot of ore bodies where certain elements have become very concentrated relative to the rest of the crust of the Earth. And that's where we set up mines and extract these materials. On other planetary bodies, those processes haven't happened to the same extent. And so we don't really have a lot of good ores that we could mine. And so what we're going to have to do is actually figure out how to extract something like rare-earth elements or copper from a raw material that doesn't have very much of those elements, doesn't have those ore minerals. And that's going to take an enormous jump in energy. Something like fusion is probably necessary to really achieve that self-sufficiency, to be able to get every element of the periodic table we need from raw materials that don't have very high concentrations.Perhaps a question I should have asked earlier: What is there a lot of out there that there's just not very much of here? I imagine whatever that is, it's the stuff that we're going to focus on first or potentially bring here. Is there stuff that's particularly abundant that we just don't have very much here?If we think of this from the level of chemical elements the answer is, not really. I mean, you could make a case that Helium-3 falls into that. But that's only true if you go out to the outer planets, Neptune and Uranus, they have a lot more helium-3 than the tiny amount that's kind of sprinkled in the lunar soil. The thing that's most abundant in space in terms of solid material is just the dirt. Almost every planetary body — the Moon, Mars, asteroids — they're all covered in this layer of regolith or dirt. And that really is the raw material that is going to have to be the feedstock for all these things we're talking about: the metals, the ceramics…We're going to have to make a lot of aluminum.Fortunately, actually, that is one thing: If we look up at the Moon at night, you have the bright regions, those are the lunar highlands. Those are almost entirely made of a mineral called anorthite that has a lot of aluminum. So there are very good sources of those kind of light structural metals on the Moon in particular.The criticisms and hurdles facing space miningDo you anticipate somebody at some point saying, “We've already overexploited the Earth. Now we're going to ruin the Moon too? And we're going to ruin Mars and asteroids — is this our galactic heritage?”Those conversations are already happening. For example, last month there was a preprint published that made the case that we should declare a moratorium on the entire north pole of the Moon, that it should be set aside for only scientific activities. Those conversations are just starting. Right now, there's no kind of legal framework to prohibit this kind of activity. Certainly, people are free to express their concerns and to propose ideas like this. But as of yet, we don't have some kind of widely ratified agreement or framework for how to responsibly use resources in space. Certainly, the people in the field of space resources, we're conscious of this. And we're not proposing to go out and strip mine the entire solar system. But I think the argument is that the potential benefits, especially in terms of well-being, just how many people could be supported with those resources, that outweighs the concerns about disturbing these natural environments.Are there types of mining that we do here right now which are kind of proofs of concept or might resemble what we would do on the Moon or Mars or an asteroid? Or would it just be totally different and these are all new technologies that we would have to innovate?Yes, there is a very good analogy, and it's something called heavy mineral sands deposits. These are not like your typical open-pit mines or your underground mines. These are kind of vast areas of loose sand on the Earth that have some very valuable elements locked up in these dense minerals. And so what happens is you go out and just scoop up these loose sediments and then you're sifting them to sort out those dense minerals that you want. So because almost every planetary body is covered in this loose unconsolidated regolith, I think that is a pretty good analogy for what we'll be looking at. You'll have excavators that scoop up that loose material, they bring it back to a processing site, and then you're sorting the minerals. It's kind of like a needle in a haystack to get the ones you want. And then the ones you don't want, you could still use those for other applications. You can melt them down, turn them into bricks, and do other things with them. That's probably the best analogy on Earth, these heavy mineral sands depositsAre the biggest hurdles making the economics work? Is it getting the basic science and technology to work? Is it sort of political support, because, at least for a long time, I would imagine even if it's a private effort there's going to be a lot of government money floating around here?I'm not worried about the fundamental technology to take material in space and turn it into useful resources. I think that's been well demonstrated in the lab, and there's a lot of research being put into that right now. It's a tractable problem. I think on the technical side, the biggest challenge is getting Starship into orbit in the near term. The progress on that seems to have stalled a little bit. And that's getting a little bit concerning, because something like that, that kind of launch capability and the cadence that allows, is really going to be necessary to enable the kind of kinds of things we talked about. On the technology side, it's really just the launch piece of it.The economics: I think people have made some pretty good business cases for things like propellant mined from the poles of the Moon and, I think, with some of these ideas around things like space-based solar power, planetary sunshades. So that's not too concerning. I think it's the combination of the launch piece of it and then the political support for this. If that were to really take a turn for the worse, that would not be good for these kinds of ambitions. I do think, though, this emerging space race with China…As long as China's interested, we're going to be interested, right?Yes. That is what's drawing in the interest of the Space Force, of DARPA. I think that's going to kind of keep things going for at least the medium term, as long as we're in that competition. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

The Nonlinear Library
LW - Nothing New: Productive Reframing by adamShimi

The Nonlinear Library

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 8, 2023 5:16


Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Nothing New: Productive Reframing, published by adamShimi on January 7, 2023 on LessWrong. In a comment on my last post, someone deplored the tendency of LW bloggers to rediscover ideas of famous philosophers and pretend that they discovered it first. This made me think of an interesting question of epistemology: is there value in reformulating and/or rediscovering things? A naive answer would be no— after all, we already have the knowledge. But a look at the history of science brings up many examples showing otherwise.. In physics, the most obvious case comes from the formulations of classical mechanics. Newton gave the core of the theory in his original formulation, but what gets applied in modern science an play a key part in the revolutions of quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics among others, are the other two formulations: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. And what these two, particularly the Lagrangian, pushed and pioneered the least action principle in physics, but capturing every system through an action that was maximized or minimized for every trajectory. This principle is one of the core building blocks of modern physics, and came out of a pure compression and reformulation of Newtonian mechanics! Similarly, potential energy started as a mathematical trick, the potential function of Lagrange which captured all gravitational forces acting on a system of N-bodies, which were the coefficients of its partial derivatives. Once again, there was nothing new here; even more than the Lagrangian and the action, this was a computational trick that sped up annoying calculations. And yet. And yet it's hard to envision modern physics, even classical mechanics at all, without potential. In modern evolutionary biology, many advances like exaptation can be brought back to Darwin's seminal work. And yet they often reveal different aspects of the idea, clarifying and bringing new intuitions to bear that make our models of life and its constraints that much richer. Again in theoretical computer science, reframing of the same core ideas is at the center of so many productive inquiries: all the models of computation unified by the Church Turing thesis, all equivalent yet providing different angles on questions of computations the non-deterministic complexity classes like NP reframed as proving/certifying classes, leading to far better intuitions and to interactive proofs and IP=PSPACE the Curry-Howard isomorphism shows that proof-calculi like Natural Deduction and type systems for computation models like the lambda calculus are actually the same thing. But this makes the two stronger, rather than weakening them for being the same thing. All in all, this pattern of rediscovering the same thing from a different perspective, of reframing the known, has been particularly productive in the history of science. Compressions, new formulations, new framing have delivered to us more than just the original insight. Why? Because we're not logically omniscient — we don't instantaneously know all the consequences of what we discover. Similarly, we're not bayesian-omniscient — we don't update on all the evidence available in the data. In both cases we are limited by what we can compute, what we can figure out. Reframings then are like shortcuts in the vastness of logical consequences, which highlight particularly interesting aspects of the evidence we originally unearthed. And I believe that one big reason for the misguided and simplistic models of science that so many share lies in the non-obviousness of these reframings' power. We don't remember them very well, we tend instead to ascribe the clarity and the power to the original thinker, even when we never used or touched their original formulation. We take for granted the intuitions and instincts that have been patiently built and bake...

The Nonlinear Library: LessWrong
LW - Nothing New: Productive Reframing by adamShimi

The Nonlinear Library: LessWrong

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 8, 2023 5:16


Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Nothing New: Productive Reframing, published by adamShimi on January 7, 2023 on LessWrong. In a comment on my last post, someone deplored the tendency of LW bloggers to rediscover ideas of famous philosophers and pretend that they discovered it first. This made me think of an interesting question of epistemology: is there value in reformulating and/or rediscovering things? A naive answer would be no— after all, we already have the knowledge. But a look at the history of science brings up many examples showing otherwise.. In physics, the most obvious case comes from the formulations of classical mechanics. Newton gave the core of the theory in his original formulation, but what gets applied in modern science an play a key part in the revolutions of quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics among others, are the other two formulations: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. And what these two, particularly the Lagrangian, pushed and pioneered the least action principle in physics, but capturing every system through an action that was maximized or minimized for every trajectory. This principle is one of the core building blocks of modern physics, and came out of a pure compression and reformulation of Newtonian mechanics! Similarly, potential energy started as a mathematical trick, the potential function of Lagrange which captured all gravitational forces acting on a system of N-bodies, which were the coefficients of its partial derivatives. Once again, there was nothing new here; even more than the Lagrangian and the action, this was a computational trick that sped up annoying calculations. And yet. And yet it's hard to envision modern physics, even classical mechanics at all, without potential. In modern evolutionary biology, many advances like exaptation can be brought back to Darwin's seminal work. And yet they often reveal different aspects of the idea, clarifying and bringing new intuitions to bear that make our models of life and its constraints that much richer. Again in theoretical computer science, reframing of the same core ideas is at the center of so many productive inquiries: all the models of computation unified by the Church Turing thesis, all equivalent yet providing different angles on questions of computations the non-deterministic complexity classes like NP reframed as proving/certifying classes, leading to far better intuitions and to interactive proofs and IP=PSPACE the Curry-Howard isomorphism shows that proof-calculi like Natural Deduction and type systems for computation models like the lambda calculus are actually the same thing. But this makes the two stronger, rather than weakening them for being the same thing. All in all, this pattern of rediscovering the same thing from a different perspective, of reframing the known, has been particularly productive in the history of science. Compressions, new formulations, new framing have delivered to us more than just the original insight. Why? Because we're not logically omniscient — we don't instantaneously know all the consequences of what we discover. Similarly, we're not bayesian-omniscient — we don't update on all the evidence available in the data. In both cases we are limited by what we can compute, what we can figure out. Reframings then are like shortcuts in the vastness of logical consequences, which highlight particularly interesting aspects of the evidence we originally unearthed. And I believe that one big reason for the misguided and simplistic models of science that so many share lies in the non-obviousness of these reframings' power. We don't remember them very well, we tend instead to ascribe the clarity and the power to the original thinker, even when we never used or touched their original formulation. We take for granted the intuitions and instincts that have been patiently built and bake...

Astro arXiv | all categories
Dust Motion and Possibility of Dust Growth in a Growing Circumstellar Disk

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 30, 2022 0:44


Dust Motion and Possibility of Dust Growth in a Growing Circumstellar Disk by Shunta Koga et al. on Wednesday 30 November We calculate the evolution of a star-forming cloud core using a three-dimensional resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulation, treating dust grains as Lagrangian particles, to investigate the dust motion in the early star formation stage. We prepare six different-sized set of dust particles in the range $a_{rm d}=0.01$--$1000,mu$m, where $a_{rm d}$ is the dust grain size. In a gravitationally collapsing cloud, a circumstellar disk forms around a protostar and drives a protostellar outflow. Almost all the small dust grains ($a_{rm d} lesssim 10$--$100,mu$m) initially distributed in the region $theta_0 lesssim 45^circ$ are ejected from the center by the outflow, where $theta_0$ is the initial zenith angle relative to the rotation axis, whereas only a small number of the large dust grains ($a_{rm d} gtrsim 100,mu$m) distributed in the region are ejected. All other grains fall onto either the protostar or disk without being ejected by the outflow. Regardless of the dust grain size, the behavior of the dust motion is divided into two trends after dust particles settle into the circumstellar disk. The dust grains reaching the inner disk region from the upper envelope preferentially fall onto the protostar, while those reaching the outer disk region or disk outer edge from the envelope can survive without an inward radial drift. These surviving grains can induce dust growth. Thus, we expect that the outer disk regions could be a favored place of planet formation. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15852v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
Dust Motion and Possibility of Dust Growth in a Growing Circumstellar Disk

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 29, 2022 0:52


Dust Motion and Possibility of Dust Growth in a Growing Circumstellar Disk by Shunta Koga et al. on Tuesday 29 November We calculate the evolution of a star-forming cloud core using a three-dimensional resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulation, treating dust grains as Lagrangian particles, to investigate the dust motion in the early star formation stage. We prepare six different-sized set of dust particles in the range $a_{rm d}=0.01$--$1000,mu$m, where $a_{rm d}$ is the dust grain size. In a gravitationally collapsing cloud, a circumstellar disk forms around a protostar and drives a protostellar outflow. Almost all the small dust grains ($a_{rm d} lesssim 10$--$100,mu$m) initially distributed in the region $theta_0 lesssim 45^circ$ are ejected from the center by the outflow, where $theta_0$ is the initial zenith angle relative to the rotation axis, whereas only a small number of the large dust grains ($a_{rm d} gtrsim 100,mu$m) distributed in the region are ejected. All other grains fall onto either the protostar or disk without being ejected by the outflow. Regardless of the dust grain size, the behavior of the dust motion is divided into two trends after dust particles settle into the circumstellar disk. The dust grains reaching the inner disk region from the upper envelope preferentially fall onto the protostar, while those reaching the outer disk region or disk outer edge from the envelope can survive without an inward radial drift. These surviving grains can induce dust growth. Thus, we expect that the outer disk regions could be a favored place of planet formation. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15852v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
Asymmetry in the number of L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans driven by jumping Jupiter

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 28, 2022 0:57


Asymmetry in the number of L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans driven by jumping Jupiter by Jian Li et al. on Monday 28 November Context. More than 10000 Jupiter Trojans have been detected so far. They are moving around the L4 and L5 triangular Lagrangian points of the Sun-Jupiter system and their distributions can provide important clues to the early evolution of the Solar System. Aims. The number asymmetry of the L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans is a longstanding problem. We aim to test a new mechanism in order to explain this anomalous feature by invoking the jumping-Jupiter scenario. Methods. First, we introduce the orbital evolution of Jupiter caused by the giant planet instability in the early Solar System. In this scenario, Jupiter could undergo an outward migration at a very high speed. We then investigate how such a jump changes the numbers of the L4 (N4) and L5 (N5) Trojans. Results. The outward migration of Jupiter can distort the co-orbital orbits near the Lagrangian points, resulting in L4 Trojans being more stable than the L5 ones. We find that, this mechanism could potentially explain the unbiased number asymmetry of N4/N5~1.6 for the known Jupiter Trojans. The uncertainties of the system parameters, e.g. Jupiter's eccentricity and inclination, the inclination distribution of Jupiter Trojans, are also taken into account and our results about the L4/L5 asymmetry have been further validated. However, the resonant amplitudes of the simulated Trojans are excited to higher values compared to the current population. A possible solution is that collisions among the Trojans may reduce their resonant amplitudes. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13877v1

Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
Asymmetry in the number of L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans driven by jumping Jupiter

Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 28, 2022 0:57


Asymmetry in the number of L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans driven by jumping Jupiter by Jian Li et al. on Monday 28 November Context. More than 10000 Jupiter Trojans have been detected so far. They are moving around the L4 and L5 triangular Lagrangian points of the Sun-Jupiter system and their distributions can provide important clues to the early evolution of the Solar System. Aims. The number asymmetry of the L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans is a longstanding problem. We aim to test a new mechanism in order to explain this anomalous feature by invoking the jumping-Jupiter scenario. Methods. First, we introduce the orbital evolution of Jupiter caused by the giant planet instability in the early Solar System. In this scenario, Jupiter could undergo an outward migration at a very high speed. We then investigate how such a jump changes the numbers of the L4 (N4) and L5 (N5) Trojans. Results. The outward migration of Jupiter can distort the co-orbital orbits near the Lagrangian points, resulting in L4 Trojans being more stable than the L5 ones. We find that, this mechanism could potentially explain the unbiased number asymmetry of N4/N5~1.6 for the known Jupiter Trojans. The uncertainties of the system parameters, e.g. Jupiter's eccentricity and inclination, the inclination distribution of Jupiter Trojans, are also taken into account and our results about the L4/L5 asymmetry have been further validated. However, the resonant amplitudes of the simulated Trojans are excited to higher values compared to the current population. A possible solution is that collisions among the Trojans may reduce their resonant amplitudes. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13877v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
Asymmetry in the number of L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans driven by jumping Jupiter

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 27, 2022 0:58


Asymmetry in the number of L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans driven by jumping Jupiter by Jian Li et al. on Sunday 27 November Context. More than 10000 Jupiter Trojans have been detected so far. They are moving around the L4 and L5 triangular Lagrangian points of the Sun-Jupiter system and their distributions can provide important clues to the early evolution of the Solar System. Aims. The number asymmetry of the L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans is a longstanding problem. We aim to test a new mechanism in order to explain this anomalous feature by invoking the jumping-Jupiter scenario. Methods. First, we introduce the orbital evolution of Jupiter caused by the giant planet instability in the early Solar System. In this scenario, Jupiter could undergo an outward migration at a very high speed. We then investigate how such a jump changes the numbers of the L4 (N4) and L5 (N5) Trojans. Results. The outward migration of Jupiter can distort the co-orbital orbits near the Lagrangian points, resulting in L4 Trojans being more stable than the L5 ones. We find that, this mechanism could potentially explain the unbiased number asymmetry of N4/N5~1.6 for the known Jupiter Trojans. The uncertainties of the system parameters, e.g. Jupiter's eccentricity and inclination, the inclination distribution of Jupiter Trojans, are also taken into account and our results about the L4/L5 asymmetry have been further validated. However, the resonant amplitudes of the simulated Trojans are excited to higher values compared to the current population. A possible solution is that collisions among the Trojans may reduce their resonant amplitudes. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13877v1

Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
Asymmetry in the number of L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans driven by jumping Jupiter

Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 27, 2022 0:58


Asymmetry in the number of L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans driven by jumping Jupiter by Jian Li et al. on Sunday 27 November Context. More than 10000 Jupiter Trojans have been detected so far. They are moving around the L4 and L5 triangular Lagrangian points of the Sun-Jupiter system and their distributions can provide important clues to the early evolution of the Solar System. Aims. The number asymmetry of the L4 and L5 Jupiter Trojans is a longstanding problem. We aim to test a new mechanism in order to explain this anomalous feature by invoking the jumping-Jupiter scenario. Methods. First, we introduce the orbital evolution of Jupiter caused by the giant planet instability in the early Solar System. In this scenario, Jupiter could undergo an outward migration at a very high speed. We then investigate how such a jump changes the numbers of the L4 (N4) and L5 (N5) Trojans. Results. The outward migration of Jupiter can distort the co-orbital orbits near the Lagrangian points, resulting in L4 Trojans being more stable than the L5 ones. We find that, this mechanism could potentially explain the unbiased number asymmetry of N4/N5~1.6 for the known Jupiter Trojans. The uncertainties of the system parameters, e.g. Jupiter's eccentricity and inclination, the inclination distribution of Jupiter Trojans, are also taken into account and our results about the L4/L5 asymmetry have been further validated. However, the resonant amplitudes of the simulated Trojans are excited to higher values compared to the current population. A possible solution is that collisions among the Trojans may reduce their resonant amplitudes. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13877v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
A Lagrangian construction of rotating stars

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 18, 2022 0:41


A Lagrangian construction of rotating stars by Misa Ogata et al. on Tuesday 18 October We present a new formulation for numerically obtaining axisymmetric equilibrium structures of rotating stars in two spatial dimensions. With a view to apply it to the secular evolution of rotating stars, we base it on the Lagrangian description, i.e., we solve the force-balance equations to find the spatial positions of fluid elements endowed individually with a mass, specific entropy and angular momentum. The system of nonlinear equations obtained by finite-differencing the basic equations are solved with the W4 method, which is a new multi-dimensional root-finding scheme of our own devising. We augment it with a remapping scheme to avoid distortions of the Lagrangian coordinates. In this first one of a series of papers, we will give a detailed description of these methods initially. We then present the results of some test calculations, which include the construction of both rapidly rotating barotropic and baroclinic equilibrium states. We gauge their accuracies quantitatively with some diagnostic quantities as well as via comparisons with the counterparts obtained with an Eulerian code. For a demonstrative purpose, we apply the code to a toy-model cooling calculation of a rotating white dwarf. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.09501v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
General relativistic simulations of collapsing binary neutron star mergers with Monte-Carlo neutrino transport

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 12, 2022 0:56


General relativistic simulations of collapsing binary neutron star mergers with Monte-Carlo neutrino transport by Francois Foucart et al. on Wednesday 12 October Recent gravitational wave observations of neutron star-neutron star and neutron star-black hole binaries appear to indicate that massive neutron stars may not be too uncommon in merging systems. These discoveries have led to an increased interest in the simulation of merging compact binaries involving massive stars. In this manuscript, we present a first set of evolution of massive neutron star binaries using Monte-Carlo radiation transport for the evolution of neutrinos. We study a range of systems, from nearly symmetric binaries that collapse to a black hole before forming a disk or ejecting material, to more asymmetric binaries in which tidal disruption of the lower mass star leads to the production of more interesting post-merger remnants. For the latter type of systems, we additionally study the impact of viscosity on the properties of the outflows, and compare our results to two recent simulations of identical binaries performed with the WhiskyTHC code. We find excellent agreement on the black hole properties, disk mass, and mass and velocity of the outflows, and some minor but noticeable differences in the evolution of the electron fraction when using a subgrid viscosity model. The method used to account for r-process heating in the determination of the outflow properties appears to have a larger impact on our result than those differences between numerical codes. We also take advantage of the use of a Monte-Carlo code to study in more detail the neutrino energy spectrum, and use the simulation with the most ejected material to verify that our newly implemented Lagrangian tracers provide a reasonable sampling of the matter outflows as they leave the computational grid. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05670v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
General relativistic simulations of collapsing binary neutron star mergers with Monte-Carlo neutrino transport

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 12, 2022 0:56


General relativistic simulations of collapsing binary neutron star mergers with Monte-Carlo neutrino transport by Francois Foucart et al. on Wednesday 12 October Recent gravitational wave observations of neutron star-neutron star and neutron star-black hole binaries appear to indicate that massive neutron stars may not be too uncommon in merging systems. These discoveries have led to an increased interest in the simulation of merging compact binaries involving massive stars. In this manuscript, we present a first set of evolution of massive neutron star binaries using Monte-Carlo radiation transport for the evolution of neutrinos. We study a range of systems, from nearly symmetric binaries that collapse to a black hole before forming a disk or ejecting material, to more asymmetric binaries in which tidal disruption of the lower mass star leads to the production of more interesting post-merger remnants. For the latter type of systems, we additionally study the impact of viscosity on the properties of the outflows, and compare our results to two recent simulations of identical binaries performed with the WhiskyTHC code. We find excellent agreement on the black hole properties, disk mass, and mass and velocity of the outflows, and some minor but noticeable differences in the evolution of the electron fraction when using a subgrid viscosity model. The method used to account for r-process heating in the determination of the outflow properties appears to have a larger impact on our result than those differences between numerical codes. We also take advantage of the use of a Monte-Carlo code to study in more detail the neutrino energy spectrum, and use the simulation with the most ejected material to verify that our newly implemented Lagrangian tracers provide a reasonable sampling of the matter outflows as they leave the computational grid. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05670v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
Baryonic Effects on Lagrangian Clustering and Angular Momentum Reconstruction

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 10, 2022 0:37


Baryonic Effects on Lagrangian Clustering and Angular Momentum Reconstruction by Ming-Jie Sheng et al. on Monday 10 October Recent studies illustrate the correlation between the angular momenta of cosmic structures and their Lagrangian properties. However, only baryons are observable and it is unclear whether they reliably trace the cosmic angular momenta. We study the Lagrangian mass distribution, spin correlation and predictability of dark matter, gas, and stellar components of galaxy-halo systems using IllustrisTNG, and show that the primordial segregations between components are typically small. Their proto-shapes are also similar in terms of the statistics of moment of inertia tensors. Under the common gravitational potential they are expected to be exerted the same tidal torque and the strong spin correlations are not destroyed by the nonlinear evolution and complicated baryonic effects, as confirmed by the high-resolution hydrodynamic simulations. We further show that their late time angular momenta traced by total gas, stars, or the central galaxies, can be reliably reconstructed by the initial perturbations. These results suggest that baryonic angular momenta can potentially be used in reconstructing the parameters and models related to the initial perturbations. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.04203v1

The Lunar Society
Tyler Cowen - Talent, Collapse, & Pessimism of Sex

The Lunar Society

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 28, 2022 94:39


It was my great pleasure to speak once again to Tyler Cowen. His most recent book is Talent, How to Find Energizers, Creatives, and Winners Across the World.We discuss:how sex is more pessimistic than he is,why he expects society to collapse permanently,why humility, stimulants, intelligence, & stimulants are overrated,how he identifies talent, deceit, & ambition,& much much much more!Watch on YouTube. Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or any other podcast platform. Read the full transcript here.Follow me on Twitter for updates on future episodes.More really cool guests coming up, subscribe to find out about future episodes!You may also enjoy my interviews of Bryan Caplan (about mental illness, discrimination, and poverty), David Deutsch (about AI and the problems with America's constitution), and Steve Hsu (about intelligence and embryo selection).If you end up enjoying this episode, I would be super grateful if you shared it. Post it on Twitter, send it to your friends & group-chats, and throw it up on any relevant subreddits & forums you follow. Can't exaggerate how much it helps a small podcast like mine.A huge thanks to Graham Bessellieu for editing this podcast and Mia Aiyana for producing its transcript.Timestamps(0:00) -Did Caplan Change On Education?(1:17) - Travel vs. History(3:10) - Do Institutions Become Left Wing Over Time?(6:02) - What Does Talent Correlate With?(13:00) - Humility, Mental Illness, Caffeine, and Suits(19:20) - How does Education affect Talent?(24:34) - Scouting Talent(33:39) - Money, Deceit, and Emergent Ventures(37:16) - Building Writing Stamina(39:41) - When Does Intelligence Start to Matter?(43:51) - Spotting Talent (Counter)signals(53:57) - Will Reading Cowen's Book Help You Win Emergent Ventures?(1:04:18) - Existential risks and the Longterm(1:12:45) - Cultivating Young Talent(1:16:05) - The Lifespans of Public Intellectuals(1:19:42) - Risk Aversion in Academia(1:26:20) - Is Stagnation Inevitable?(1:31:33) - What are Podcasts for?TranscriptDid Caplan Change On Education?Tyler Cowen   Ask Bryan about early and late Caplan. In which ways are they not consistent? That's a kind of friendly jab.Dwarkesh Patel   Okay, interesting. Tyler Cowen   Garrett Jones has tweeted about this in the past. In The Myth of the Rational Voter, education is so wonderful. It no longer seems to be true, but it was true from the data Bryan took from. Bryan doesn't think education really teaches you much. Dwarkesh Patel So then why is it making you want a free market?Tyler Cowen  It once did, even though it doesn't now, and if it doesn't now, it may teach them bad things. But it's teaching them something.Dwarkesh Patel   I have asked him this. He thinks that education doesn't teach them anything; therefore, that woke-ism can't be a result of colleges. I asked him, “okay, at some point, these were ideas in colleges, but now they're in the broader world. What do you think happened? Why did it transition together?” I don't think he had a good answer to that.Tyler Cowen   Yeah, you can put this in the podcast if you want. I like the free podcast talk often better than the podcast. [laughs]Dwarkesh Patel   Okay. Well yeah, we can just start rolling. Today, it is my great pleasure to speak to Tyler Cowen about his new book, “Talent, How to Find Energizers, Creatives, and Winners Across the World.” Tyler, welcome (once again) to The Lunar Society. Tyler Cowen   Happy to be here, thank you!Travel vs. HistoryDwarkesh Patel 1:51  Okay, excellent. I'll get into talent in just a second, but I've got a few questions for you first. So in terms of novelty and wonder, do you think travelling to the past would be a fundamentally different experience from travelling to different countries today? Or is it kind of in the same category?Tyler Cowen   You need to be protected against disease and have some access to the languages, and obviously, your smartphone is not going to work, right? So if you adjust for those differences, I think it would be a lot like travelling today except there'd be bigger surprises because no one else has gone to the past. Older people were there in a sense, but if you go back to ancient Athens, or the peak of the Roman Empire, you'd be the first traveller. Dwarkesh Patel   So do you think the experience of reading a history book is somewhat substitutable for actually travelling to a place? Tyler Cowen   Not at all! I think we understand the past very very poorly. If you've travelled appropriately in contemporary times, it should make you more skeptical about history because you'll realize how little you can learn about the current places just by reading about them. So it's like Travel versus History, and the historians lose.Dwarkesh Patel   Oh, interesting. So I'm curious, how does travelling a lot change your perspective when you read a work of history? In what ways does it do so? Are you skeptical of it to an extent that you weren't before, and what do you think historians are probably getting wrong? Tyler Cowen   It may not be a concrete way, but first you ask: was the person there? If it's a biography, did the author personally know the subject of the biography? That becomes an extremely important question. I was just in India for the sixth time, I hardly pretend to understand India, whatever that possibly might mean, but before I went at all, I'd read a few hundred books about India, and it's not like I got nothing out of them, but in some sense, I knew nothing about India. Now that I've visited, the other things I read make more sense, including the history.Do Institutions Become Left Wing Over Time?Dwarkesh Patel   Okay, interesting. So you've asked this question to many of your guests, and I don't think any of them have had a good answer. So let me just ask you: what do you think is the explanation behind Conquest's Second Law? Why does any institution that is not explicitly right-wing become left-wing over time?Tyler Cowen   Well, first of all, I'm not sure that Conquest's Second Law is true. So you have something like the World Bank which was sort of centrist state-ist in the 1960s, and by the 1990s became fairly neoliberal. Now, about what's left-wing/right-wing, it's global, it's complicated, but it's not a simple case of Conquest's Second Law holding. I do think that for a big part of the latter post-war era, some version of Conquest's Law does mostly hold for the United States. But once you see that it's not universal, you're just asking: well, why have parts? Why has the American intelligentsia shifted to the left? So that there's political science literature on educational polarization? [laughs] I wouldn't say it's a settled question, but it's not a huge mystery like “how Republicans act wackier than Democrats are” for example. The issues realign in particular ways. I believe that's why Conquest's Law locally is mostly holding.Dwarkesh Patel   Oh, interesting. So you don't think there's anything special about the intellectual life that tends to make people left-wing, and this issue is particular to our current moment?Tyler Cowen    I think by choosing the words “left-wing” you're begging the question. There's a lot of historical areas where what is left-wing is not even well defined, so in that sense, Conquests Law can't even hold there. I once had a debate with Marc Andreessen about this–– I think Mark tends to see things that are left-wing/right-wing as somewhat universal historical categories, and I very much do not. In medieval times, what's left wing and what's right wing? Even in 17th century England, there were particular groups who on particular issues were very left-wing or right-wing. It seems to me to be very unsatisfying, and there's a lot of fluidity in how these axes play out over real issues.Dwarkesh Patel   Interesting. So maybe then it's what is considered “left” at the time that tends to be the thing that ends up winning. At least, that's how it looks like looking back on it. That's how we categorize things. Something insightful I heard is that “if the left keeps winning, then just redefine what the left is.” So if you think of prohibition at the time, it was a left-wing cause, but now, the opposite of prohibition is left-wing because we just changed what the left is.Tyler Cowen    Exactly. Take the French Revolution: they're the historical equivalent of nonprofits versus 1830s restoration. Was everything moving to the left, between Robespierre and 1830? I don't pretend to know, but it just sure doesn't seem that way. So again, there seem to be a lot of cases where Conquest's Law is not so economical.Dwarkesh Patel   Napoleon is a great example of this where we're not sure whether he's the most left-wing figure in history or the most right-wing figure in history.Tyler Cowen 6:00Maybe he's both somehow.What Does Talent Correlate With?Dwarkesh Patel How much of talent or the lack thereof is a moral judgment for you? Just to give some context, when I think that somebody is not that intelligent, for me, that doesn't seem like a moral judgment. That just seems like a lottery. When I say that somebody's not hard working, that seems like more of a moral judgment. So on that spectrum, where would you say talent lies?Tyler Cowen   I don't know. My default is that most people aren't that ambitious. I'm fine with that. It actually creates some opportunities for the ambitious–– there might be an optimal degree of ambition. Well, short of everyone being sort of maximally ambitious. So I don't go around pissed off at unambitious people, judging them in some moralizing way. I think a lot of me is on autopilot when it comes to morally judging people from a distance. I don't wake up in the morning and get pissed off at someone in the Middle East doing whatever, even though I might think it was wrong.Dwarkesh Patel   So when you read the biographies of great people, often you see there's a bit of an emotional neglect and abuse when they're kids. Why do you think this is such a common trope?Tyler Cowen   I would love to see the data, but I'm not convinced that it's more common than with other people. Famous people, especially those who have biographies, on average are from earlier times, and in earlier times, children were treated worse. So it could be correlated without being causal. Now, maybe there's this notion that you need to have something to prove. Maybe you only feel you need to prove something if you're Napoleon and you're short, and you weren't always treated well. That's possible and I don't rule it out. But you look at Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg without pretending to know what their childhoods were like.  It sure sounds like they were upper middle class kids treated very well, at least from a distance. For example, the Collison's had great parents and they did well.Dwarkesh Patel   It could just be that the examples involving emotional neglect stuck out in my mind in particular.  Tyler Cowen   Yeah. So I'd really like to see the data. I think it's an important and very good question. It seems to me, maybe one could investigate it, but I've never seen an actual result.Dwarkesh Patel   Is there something you've learned about talent spotting through writing the book that you wish wasn't so? Maybe you found it disturbing, or you found it disappointing in some way. Is there something that is a correlate for talent that you wish wasn't? Tyler Cowen   I don't know. Again, I think I'm relatively accepting of a lot of these realities, but the thing that disappoints me a bit is how geographically clustered talent is. I don't mean where it was born, and I don't mean ethnically. I just mean where it ends up. So if you get an application, say from rural Italy where maybe living standards are perfectly fine–– there's good weather, there's olive oil, there's pasta. But the application just probably not that good. Certainly, Italians have had enough amazing achievements over the millennia, but right now, the people there who are actually up to something are going to move to London or New York or somewhere. So I find that a bit depressing. It's not really about the people. Dwarkesh Patel   When you do find a cluster of talent, to what extent can that be explained by a cyclical view of what's happening in the region? In the sense of the “hard times create strong men” theory? I mean at some point, Italy had a Renaissance, so maybe things got complacent over time.Tyler Cowen   Again, maybe that's true for Italy, but most of the talent clusters have been such for a long time, like London and New York. It's not cyclical. They've just had a ton of talent for a very long time. They still do, and later on, they still will. Maybe not literally forever, but it seems like an enduring effect.Dwarkesh Patel   But what if they leave? For example, the Central European Jews couldn't stay where they were anymore and had to leave.Tyler Cowen   Obviously, I think war can destroy almost anything. So German scientific talent took a big whack, German cultural talent too. I mean, Hungarian Jews and mathematics-–I don't know big of a trend it still is, but it's certainly nothing close to what it once was.Dwarkesh Patel   Okay. I was worried that if you realize that some particular region has a lot of talent right now, then that might be a one-time gain. You realize that India, Toronto or Nigeria or something have a lot of talent, but the culture doesn't persist in some sort of extended way. Tyler Cowen   That might be true for where talent comes from, but where it goes just seems to show more persistence. People will almost certainly be going to London for centuries. Is London producing a lot of talent? That's less clear. That may be much more cyclical. In the 17th century, London was amazing, right? London today? I would say I don't know. But it's not obvious that it's coming close to its previous glories. So the current status of India I think, will be temporary, but temporary for a long time. It's just a very big place. It has a lot of centres and there are things it has going for it like not taking prosperity for granted. But it will have all of these for quite a while–– India's still pretty poor.Dwarkesh Patel   What do you think is the difference between actual places where clusters of talent congregate and places where that are just a source of that talent? What makes a place a sink rather than a source of talent?Tyler Cowen   I think finding a place where people end up going is more or less obvious. You need money, you need a big city, you need some kind of common trade or linguistic connection. So New York and London are what they are for obvious reasons, right? Path dependence history, the story of making it in the Big Apple and so on. But origins and where people come from are areas that I think theory is very bad at understanding. Why did the Renaissance blossom in Florence and Venice, and not in Milan? If you're going back earlier, it wasn't obvious that it would be those places. I've done a lot of reading to try to figure this out, but I find that I've gotten remarkably not far on the question.Dwarkesh Patel   The particular examples you mentioned today–– like New York, San Francisco, London, these places today are kind of high stakes, because if you want to move there, it's expensive. Do you think that this is because they've been so talented despite this fact, or because you need some sort of exclusion in order to be a haven of talent?Tyler Cowen   Well, I think this is a problem for San Francisco. It may be a more temporary cluster than it ought to have been. Since it's a pretty recent cluster, it can't count on the same kind of historical path dependence that New York and Manhattan have. But a lot of New York still is not that expensive. Look at the people who work and live there! They're not all rich, to say the least. And that is an important part of why New York is still New York. With London, it's much harder, but it seems to me that London is a sink for somewhat established talent––which is fine, right? However, in that regard, it's much inferior to New York.Humility, Mental Illness, Caffeine, and Suits Dwarkesh Patel   Okay, I want to play a game of overrated and underrated with you, but we're going to do it with certain traits or certain kinds of personalities that might come in when you're interviewing people.Tyler Cowen   Okay, it's probably all going to be indeterminate, but go on.Dwarkesh Patel   Right. So somebody comes in, and they're very humble.Tyler Cowen   Immediately I'm suspicious. I figure most people who are going to make something of themselves are arrogant. If they're willing to show it, there's a certain bravery or openness in that. I don't rule out the humble person doing great. A lot of people who do great are humble, but I just get a wee bit like, “what's up with you? You're not really humble, are you?”Dwarkesh Patel   Maybe humility is a way of avoiding confrontation–– if you don't have the competence to actually show that you can be great. Tyler Cowen   It might be efficient for them to avoid confrontation, but I just start thinking that I don't know the real story. When I see a bit of arrogance, I'm less likely to think that it may, in a way, be feigned. But the feigning of arrogance in itself is a kind of arrogance. So in that sense, I'm still getting the genuine thing. Dwarkesh Patel   So what is the difference? Let's say a 15-year-old who is kind of arrogant versus a 50-year-old who is kind of arrogant, and the latter has accomplishments already while the first one doesn't. Is there a difference in how you perceive humility or the lack thereof?Tyler Cowen   Oh, sure. With the 50-year-old, you want to see what they have done, and you're much more likely to think the 50 year old should feign humility than the 15-year-old. Because that's the high-status thing to do–– it's to feign humility. If they can't do that, you figure, “Here's one thing they're bad at. What else are they bad at?” Whereas with the 15-year-old, maybe they have a chip on their shoulder and they can't quite hold it all in. Oh, that's great and fine. Let's see what you're gonna do.Dwarkesh Patel   How arrogant can you be? There are many 15 year olds who are really good at math, and they have ambitions like “I want to solve P ≠ NP” or “I want to build an AGI” or something. Is there some level where you just clearly don't understand what's going on since you think you can do something like that? Or is arrogance always a plus?Tyler Cowen   I haven't seen that level of arrogance yet. If a 15-year-old said to me, “in three years, I'm going to invent a perpetual motion machine,”  I would think “No, now you're just crazy.” But no one's ever said that to me. There's this famous Mark Zuckerberg story where he went into the VC meeting at Sequoia wearing his pajamas and he told Sequoia not to give him money. He was 18 at a minimum, that's pretty arrogant behavior and we should be fine with that. We know how the story ends. So it's really hard to be too arrogant. But once you say this, because of the second order effect, you start thinking: “Well, are they just being arrogant as an act?” And then in the “act sense”, yes, they can be too arrogant.Dwarkesh Patel   Isn't the backstory there that Mark was friends with Sean Parker and then Sean Parker had beef with Sequoia…Tyler Cowen   There's something like that. I wouldn't want to say off the top of my head exactly what, but there is a backstory.Dwarkesh Patel   Okay. Somebody comes in professionally dressed when they don't need to. They've got a crisp clean shirt. They've got a nice wash. Tyler Cowen How old are they?Dwarkesh Patel 20.Tyler Cowen They're too conformist. Again, with some jobs, conformity is great, but I get a little suspicious, at least for what I'm looking for. Though I wouldn't rule them out for a lot of things–– it's a plus, right?Dwarkesh Patel   Is there a point though, where you're in some way being conformist by dressing up in a polo shirt? Like if you're in San Francisco right now, it seems like the conformist thing is not to wear a suit to an interview if you're trying to be a software engineer.Tyler Cowen   Yeah, there might be situations where it's so weird, so over the top, so conformist, that it's actually totally non-conformist. Like “I don't know anyone who's a conformist like you are!” Maybe it's not being a conformist, or just being some kind of nut, that makes you interested again.Dwarkesh Patel   An overall sense that you get from the person that they're really content, almost like Buddha came in for an interview. A sense of wellbeing.Tyler Cowen   It's gonna depend on context, I don't think I'd hold it against someone, but I wouldn't take it at face value. You figure they're antsy in some way, you hope. You'll see it with more time, I would just think.Dwarkesh Patel   Somebody who uses a lot of nootropics. They're constantly using caffeine, but maybe on the side (multiple times a week), they're also using Adderall, Modafinil, and other kinds of nootropics.Tyler Cowen   I don't personally like it, but I've never seen evidence that it's negatively correlated with success, so I would try to put it out of my mind. I sort of personally get a queasy feeling like “Do you really know what you're doing. Is all this stuff good for you? Why do you need this?” That's my actual reaction, but again, at the intellectual level, it does seem to work for some people, or at least not screw them up too much.Dwarkesh Patel   You don't drink caffeine, correct? Tyler Cowen  Zero.Dwarkesh Patel Why?Tyler Cowen I don't like it. It might be bad for you. Dwarkesh Patel Oh really, you think so? Tyler Cowen People get addicted to it.Dwarkesh Patel    You're not worried it might make you less productive over the long term? It's more about you just don't want to be addicted to something?Tyler Cowen   Well, since I don't know it well, I'm not sure what my worries are. But the status quo regime seems to work. I observe a lot of people who end up addicted to coffee, coke, soda, stuff we know is bad for you. So I think: “What's the problem I need to solve? Why do it?”Dwarkesh Patel   What if they have a history of mental illness like depression or anxiety? Not that mental illnesses are good, but at the current margins, do you think that maybe they're punished too heavily? Or maybe that people don't take them seriously enough that they actually have a bigger signal than the people are considering?Tyler Cowen   I don't know. I mean, both could be true, right? So there's definitely positive correlations between that stuff and artistic creativity. Whether or not it's causal is harder to say, but it correlates. So you certainly should take the person seriously. But would they be the best Starbucks cashier? I don't know.How does Education Affect Talent?Dwarkesh Patel   Yeah. In another podcast, you've pointed out that some of the most talented people you see who are neglected are 15 to 17 year olds. How does this impact how you think? Let's say you were in charge of a high school, you're the principal of a high school, and you know that there's 2000 students there. A few of them have to be geniuses, right? How is the high school run by Tyler Cowen? Especially for the very smartest people there? Tyler Cowen   Less homework! I would work harder to hire better teachers, pay them more, and fire the bad ones if I'm allowed to do that. Those are no-brainers, but mainly less homework and I'd have more people come in who are potential role models. Someone like me! I was invited once to Flint Hill High School in Oakton, it's right nearby. I went in, I wasn't paid. I just figured “I'll do this.” It seems to me a lot of high schools don't even try. They could get a bunch of people to come in for free to just say “I'm an economist, here's what being an economist is like” for 45 minutes. Is that so much worse than the BS the teacher has to spew? Of course not. So I would just do more things like that.Dwarkesh Patel   I want to understand the difference between these three options. The first is: somebody like you actually gives an in-person lecture saying “this is what life is like”. The second is zoom, you could use zoom to do that. The third is that it's not live in any way whatsoever. You're just kind of like maybe showing a video of the person. Tyler Cowen   I'm a big believer in vividness. So Zoom is better than nothing. A lot of people are at a distance, but I think you'll get more and better responses by inviting local people to do it live. And there's plenty of local people, where most of the good schools are.Dwarkesh Patel   Are you tempted to just give these really smart 15-year-olds a hall pass to the library all day and some WiFi access, and then just leave them alone? Or do you think that they need some sort of structure?Tyler Cowen   I think they need some structure, but you have to let them rebel against it and do their own thing. Zero structure strikes me as great for a few of them, but even for the super talented ones, it's not perfect. They need exposure to things, and they need some teachers as role models. So you want them to have some structure.Dwarkesh Patel   If you read old books about education, there's a strong emphasis on moral instruction. Do you think that needs to be an important part of education? Tyler Cowen   I'd like to see more data. But I suspect the best moral instruction is the teachers actually being good people. I think that works. But again, I'd like to see the data. But somehow getting up and lecturing them about the seven virtues or something. That seems to me to be a waste of time, and maybe even counterproductive.Dwarkesh Patel   Now, the way I read your book about talent, it also seems like a critique of Bryan's book, The Case Against Education.Tyler Cowen   Ofcourse it is. Bryan describes me as the guy who's always torturing him, and in a sense, he's right.Dwarkesh Patel   Well, I guess more specifically, it seems that Bryan's book relies on the argument that you need a costly signal to show that you have talent, or you have intelligence, conscientiousness, and other traits. But if you can just learn that from a 1500 word essay and a zoom call, then maybe college is not about the signal.Tyler Cowen   In that sense, I'm not sure it's a good critique of Bryan. So for most people in the middle of the distribution, I don't think you can learn what I learned from Top 5 Emergent Ventures winners through an application and a half-hour zoom call. But that said, I think the talent book shows you my old saying: context is that which is scarce. And you're always testing people for their understanding of context. Most people need a fair amount of higher education to acquire that context, even if they don't remember the detailed content of their classes. So I think Bryan overlooks how much people actually learn when they go to school.Dwarkesh Patel   How would you go about measuring the amount of context of somebody who went to college? Is there something you can point to that says, “Oh, clearly they're getting some context, otherwise, they wouldn't be able to do this”?Tyler Cowen   I think if you meet enough people who didn't go to college, you'll see the difference, on average. Stressing the word average. Now there are papers measuring positive returns to higher education. I don't think they all show it's due to context, but I am persuaded by most of Brian's arguments that you don't remember the details of what you learned in class. Oh, you learn this about astronomy and Kepler's laws and opportunity costs, etc. but people can't reproduce that two or three years later. It seems pretty clear we know that. However, they do learn a lot of context and how to deal with different personality types.Dwarkesh Patel   Would you falsify this claim, though, that you are getting a lot of context? Is it just something that you had to qualitatively evaluate? What would have to be true in the world for you to conclude that the opposite is true? Tyler Cowen   Well, if you could show people remembered a lot of the facts they learned, and those facts were important for their jobs, neither of which I think is true. But in principle, they're demonstrable, then you would be much more skeptical about the context being the thing that mattered. But as it stands now, that's the residual. And it's probably what matters.Dwarkesh Patel   Right. So I thought that Bryan shared in the book that actually people don't even remember many of the basic facts that they learned in school.Tyler Cowen   Ofcourse they don't. But that's not the main thing they learn. They learn some vision of how the world works, how they fit into it, that they ought to have higher aspirations, that they can join the upper middle class, that they're supposed to have a particular kind of job. Here are the kinds of jerks you're going to meet along the way! Here's some sense of how dating markets work! Maybe you're in a fraternity, maybe you do a sport and so on. That's what you learned. Dwarkesh Patel   How did you spot Bryan?Tyler Cowen   He was in high school when I met him, and it was some kind of HS event. I think he made a point of seeking me out. And I immediately thought, “Well this guy is going to be something like, gotta keep track of this guy. Right away.”Dwarkesh Patel   Can you say more - what happened?Tyler Cowen   His level of enthusiasm, his ability to speak with respect to detail. He was just kind of bursting with everything. It was immediately evident, as it still is. Bryan has changed less than almost anyone else I know over what is now.. he could tell you how many years but it's been a whole bunch of decades.Dwarkesh Patel   Interesting. So if that's the case, then it would have been interesting to meet somebody who is like Bryan, but a 19 year old.Tyler Cowen   Yeah, and I did. I was right. Talent ScoutingDwarkesh Patel   To what extent do the best talent scouts inevitably suffer from Goodhart's Law? Has something like this happened to you where your approval gets turned into a credential? So a whole bunch of non-earnest people start applying, you get a whole bunch of adverse selection, and then it becomes hard for you to run your program.Tyler Cowen   It is not yet hard to run the program. If I needed to, I would just shut down applications. I've seen a modest uptick in bad applications, but it takes so little time to decide they're no good, or just not a good fit for us that it's not a problem. So the endorsement does get credentialized. Mostly, that's a good thing, right? Like you help the people you pick. And then you see what happens next and you keep on innovating as you need to.Dwarkesh Patel   You say in the book that the super talented are best at spotting other super talented individuals. And there aren't many of the super talented talent spotters to go around. So this sounds like you're saying that if you're not super talented, much of the book will maybe not do you a bunch of good. Results be weary should be maybe on the title. How much of talent spotting can be done by people who aren't themselves super talented?Tyler Cowen   Well, I'd want to see the context of what I wrote. But I'm well aware of the fact that in basketball, most of the greatest general managers were not great players. Someone like Jerry West, right? I'd say Pat Riley was not. So again, that's something you could study. But I don't generally think that the best talent scouts are themselves super talented.Dwarkesh Patel   Then what is the skill in particular that they have that if it's not the particular thing that they're working on?Tyler Cowen   Some intangible kind of intuition, where they feel the right thing in the people they meet. We try to teach people that intuition, the same way you might teach art or music appreciation. But it's not a science. It's not paint-by-numbers.Dwarkesh Patel   Even with all the advice in the book, and even with the stuff that isn't in the book that is just your inarticulable knowledge about how to spot talent, all your intuitions… How much of the variance in somebody's “True Potential” is just fundamentally unpredictable? If it's just like too chaotic of a thing to actually get your grips on. To what extent are we going to truly be able to spot talent?Tyler Cowen   I think it will always be an art. If you look at the success rates of VCs, it depends on what you count as the pool they're drawing from, but their overall rate of picking winners is not that impressive. And they're super high stakes. They're super smart. So I think it will mostly remain an art and not a science. People say, “Oh, genomics this, genomics that”. We'll see, but somehow I don't think that will change this.Dwarkesh Patel   You don't think getting a polygenic risk score of drive, for example, is going to be a thing that happens?Tyler Cowen   Maybe future genomics will be incredibly different from what we have now. Maybe. But it's not around the corner.Dwarkesh Patel   Yeah. Maybe the sample size is just so low and somebody is like “How are you even gonna collect that data? How are you gonna get the correlates of who the super talented people are?”Tyler Cowen   That, plus how genomic data interact with each other. You can apply machine learning and so on, but it just seems quite murky.Dwarkesh Patel   If the best people get spotted earlier, and you can tell who is a 10x engineer in a company and who is only a 1x engineer, or a 0.5x engineer, doesn't that mean that, in a way that inequality will get worse? Because now the 10x engineer knows that they're 10x, and everybody else knows that they're 10x, they're not going to be willing to cross subsidize and your other employees are going to be wanting to get paid proportionate to their skill.Tyler Cowen   Well, they might be paid more, but they'll also innovate more, right? So they'll create more benefits for people who are doing nothing. My intuition is that overall, inequality of wellbeing will go down. But you can't say that's true apriori. Inequality of income might also go up.Dwarkesh Patel   And then will the slack in the system go away for people who are not top performers? Like you can tell now, if we're getting better.Tyler Cowen   This has happened already in contemporary America. As I wrote, “Average is over.” Not due to super sophisticated talent spotting. Sometimes, it's simply the fact that in a lot of service sectors, you can measure output reasonably directly––like did you finish the computer program? Did it work? That has made it harder for people to get paid things they don't deserve.Dwarkesh Patel   I wonder if this leads to adverse selection in the areas where you can't measure how well somebody is doing. So the people who are kind of lazy and bums, they'll just go into places where output can't be measured. So these industries will just be overflowing with the people who don't want to work.Tyler Cowen   Absolutely. And then the people who are talented in the sectors, maybe they'll leave and start their own companies and earn through equity, and no one is really ever measuring their labor power. Still, what they're doing is working and they're making more from it.Dwarkesh Patel   If talent is partly heritable, then the better you get at spotting talent, over time, will the social mobility in society go down?Tyler Cowen   Depends how you measure social mobility. Is it relative to the previous generation? Most talent spotters don't know a lot about parents, like I don't know anything about your parents at all! The other aspect of spotting talent is hoping the talent you mobilize does great things for people not doing anything at all. That's the kind of automatic social mobility they get. But if you're measuring quintiles across generations, the intuition could go either way.Dwarkesh Patel   But this goes back to wondering whether this is a one time gain or not. Maybe initially they can help the people who are around them. Somebody in Brazil, they help people around them. But once you've found them, they're gonna go to those clusters you talked about, and they're gonna be helping the people with San Francisco who don't need help. So is this a one time game then?Tyler Cowen   Many people from India seem to give back to India in a very consistent way. People from Russia don't seem to do that. That may relate to the fact that Russia is in terrible shape, and India has a brighter future. So it will depend. But I certainly think there are ways of arranging things where people give back a lot.Dwarkesh Patel   Let's talk about Emergent Ventures. Sure. So I wonder: if the goal of Emergent Ventures is to raise aspirations, does that still work given the fact that you have to accept some people but reject other people? In Bayesian terms, the updates up have to equal the updates down? In some sense, you're almost transferring a vision edge from the excellent to the truly great. You see what I'm saying?Tyler Cowen   Well, you might discourage the people you turn away. But if they're really going to do something, they should take that as a challenge. And many do! Like “Oh, I was rejected by Harvard, I had to go to UChicago, but I decided, I'm going to show those b******s.” I think we talked about that a few minutes ago. So if I just crushed the spirits of those who are rejected, I don't feel too bad about that. They should probably be in some role anyway where they're just working for someone.Dwarkesh Patel   But let me ask you the converse of that which is, if you do accept somebody, are you worried that if one of the things that drives people is getting rejected, and then wanting to prove that you will reject them wrong, are you worried that by accepting somebody when they're 15, you're killing that thing? The part of them that wants to get some kind of approval?Tyler Cowen   Plenty of other people will still reject them right? Not everyone accepts them every step of the way. Maybe they're just awesome. LeBron James is basketball history and past a certain point, it just seems everyone wanted him for a bunch of decades now. I think deliberately with a lot of candidates, you shouldn't encourage them too much. I make a point of chewing out a lot of people just to light a fire under them, like “what you're doing. It's not gonna work.” So I'm all for that selectively.Dwarkesh Patel   Why do you think that so many of the people who have led Emergent Ventures are interested in Effective Altruism?Tyler Cowen   There is a moment right now for Effective Altruism, where it is the thing. Some of it is political polarization, the main parties are so stupid and offensive, those energies will go somewhere. Some of that in 1970 maybe went to libertarianism. Libertarianism has been out there for too long. It doesn't seem to address a lot of current problems, like climate change or pandemics very well. So where should the energy go? The Rationality community gets some of it and that's related to EA, as I'm sure you know. The tech startup community gets some of it. That's great! It seems to be working pretty well to me. Like I'm not an EA person. But maybe they deserve a lot of it.Dwarkesh Patel   But you don't think it's persistent. You think it comes and goes?Tyler Cowen   I think it will come and go. But I think EA will not vanish. Like libertarianism, it will continue for quite a long time.Dwarkesh Patel   Is there any movement that has attracted young people? That has been persistent over time? Or did they all fade? Tyler Cowen   Christianity. Judaism. Islam. They're pretty persistent. [laughs]Dwarkesh Patel   So to the extent that being more religious makes you more persistent, can we view the criticism of EA saying that it's kind of like a religion as a plus?Tyler Cowen   Ofcourse, yeah! I think it's somewhat like a religion. To me, that's a plus, we need more religions. I wish more of the religions we needed were just flat-out religions. But in the meantime, EA will do,Money, Deceit, and Emergent VenturesDwarkesh Patel   Are there times when somebody asks you for a grant and you view that as a negative signal? Let's say they're especially when well off: they're a former Google engineer, they wanna start a new project, and they're asking you for a grant. Do you worry that maybe they're too risk averse? Do you want them to put their own capital into it? Or do you think that maybe they were too conformist because they needed your approval before they went ahead?Tyler Cowen   Things like this have happened. And I asked people flat out, “Why do you want this grant from me?” And it is a forcing question in the sense that if their answer isn't good, I won't give it to them. Even though they might have a good level of talent, good ideas, whatever, they have to be able to answer that question in a credible way. Some can, some can't.Dwarkesh Patel   I remember that the President of the University of Chicago many years back said that if you rejected the entire class of freshmen that are coming in and accepted the next 1500 that they had to reject that year, then there'll be no difference in the quality of the admits.Tyler Cowen   I would think UChicago is the one school where that's not true. I agree that it's true for most schools.Dwarkesh Patel   Do you think that's also true of Emergent Ventures?Tyler Cowen   No. Not at all.Dwarkesh Patel   How good is a marginal reject?Tyler Cowen   Not good. It's a remarkably bimodal distribution as I perceive it, and maybe I'm wrong. But there aren't that many cases where I'm agonizing and if I'm agonizing I figure it probably should be a no.Dwarkesh Patel   I guess that makes it even tougher if you do get rejected. Because it wasn't like, “oh, you weren't a right fit for the job,” or “you almost made the cut.” It's like, “No, we're actually just assessing your potential and not some sort of fit for the job.” Not only were you just not on the edge of potential, but you were also way on the other edge of the curve.Tyler Cowen   But a lot of these rejected people and projects, I don't think they're spilling tears over it. Like you get an application. Someone's in Akron, Ohio, and they want to start a nonprofit dog shelter. They saw EV on the list of things you can apply to. They apply to a lot of things and maybe never get funding. It's like people who enter contests or something, they apply to EV. Nothing against non-profit dog shelters, but that's kind of a no, right? I genuinely don't know their response, but I don't think they walk away from the experience with some deeper model of what they should infer from the EV decision.Dwarkesh Patel   How much does the money part of Emergent Ventures matter? If you just didn't give them the money?Tyler Cowen   There's a whole bunch of proposals that really need the money for capital costs, and then it matters a lot. For a lot of them, the money per se doesn't matter.Dwarkesh Patel   Right, then. So what is the function of return for that? Do you like 10x the money, or do you add .1x the money for some of these things? Do you think they add up to seemingly different results? Tyler Cowen   I think a lot of foundations give out too many large grants and not enough small grants. I hope I'm at an optimum. But again, I don't have data to tell you. I do think about this a lot, and I think small grants are underrated.Dwarkesh Patel   Why are women often better at detecting deceit?Tyler Cowen   I would assume for biological and evolutionary reasons that there are all these men trying to deceive them, right? The cost of a pregnancy is higher for a woman than for a man on average, by quite a bit. So women will develop defense mechanisms that men maybe don't have as much.Dwarkesh Patel   One thing I heard from somebody I was brainstorming these questions with–– she just said that maybe it's because women just discuss personal matters more. And so therefore, they have a greater library.Tyler Cowen   Well, that's certainly true. But that's subordinate to my explanation, I'd say. There are definitely a lot of intermediate steps. Things women do more of that help them be insightful.Building Writing StaminaDwarkesh Patel   Why is writing skill so important to you?Tyler Cowen   Well, one thing is that I'm good at judging it. Across scales, I'm very bad at judging, so there's nothing on the EV application testing for your lacrosse skill. But look, writing is a form of thinking. And public intellectuals are one of the things I want to support. Some of the companies I admire are ones with writing cultures like Amazon or Stripe. So writing it is! I'm a good reader. So you're going to be asked to write.Dwarkesh Patel   Do you think it's a general fact that writing correlates with just general competence? Tyler Cowen   I do, but especially the areas that I'm funding. It's strongly related. Whether it's true for everything is harder to say.Dwarkesh Patel   Can stamina be increased?Tyler Cowen   Of course. It's one of the easier things to increase. I don't think you can become superhuman in your energy and stamina if you're not born that way. But I think almost everyone could increase by 30% to 50%, some notable amount. Dwarkesh Patel   Okay, that's interesting.Tyler Cowen   Put aside maybe people with disabilities or something but definitely when it comes to people in regular circumstances.Dwarkesh Patel   Okay. I think it's interesting because in the blog post from Robin Hanson about stamina, I think his point of view was that this is just something that's inherent to people.Tyler Cowen   Well, I don't think that's totally false. The people who have superhuman stamina are born that way. But there are plenty of origins. I mean, take physical stamina. You don't think people can train more and run for longer? Of course they can. It's totally proven. So it would be weird if this rule held for all these organs but not your brain. That seems quite implausible. Especially for someone like Robin, where your brain is just this other organ that you're gonna download or upload or goodness knows what with it. He's a physicalist if there ever was one.Dwarkesh Patel   Have you read Haruki Murakami's book on running?Tyler Cowen   No, I've been meaning to. I'm not sure how interesting I'll find it. I will someday. I like his stuff a lot.Dwarkesh Patel   But what I found really interesting about it was just how linked building physical stamina is for him to building up the stamina to write a lot.Tyler Cowen   Magnus Carlsen would say the same with chess. Being in reasonable physical shape is important for your mental stamina, which is another kind of simple proof that you can boost your mental stamina.When Does Intelligence Start to Matter?Dwarkesh Patel   After reading the book, I was inclined to think that intelligence matters more than I previously thought. Not less. You say in the book that intelligence has convex returns and that it matters especially for areas like inventors. Then you also say that if you look at some of the most important things in society, something like what Larry and Sergey did, they're basically inventors, right? So in many of the most important things in society, intelligence matters more because of the increasing returns. It seems like with Emergent Ventures, you're trying to pick the people who are at the tail. You're not looking for a barista at Starbucks. So it seems like you should care about intelligence more, given the evidence there. Tyler Cowen   More than who does? I feel what the book presents is, in fact, my view. So kind of by definition, I agree with that view. But yes, there's a way of reading it where intelligence really matters a lot. But it's only for a relatively small number of jobs.Dwarkesh Patel   Maybe you just started off with a really high priori on intelligence, and that's why you downgraded?Tyler Cowen   There are a lot of jobs that I actually hire for in actual life, where smarts are not the main thing I look for.Dwarkesh Patel   Does the convexity of returns on intelligence suggest that maybe the multiplicative model is wrong? Because if the multiplicative model is right, you would expect to see decreasing returns and putting your stats on one skill. You'd want to diversify more, right?Tyler Cowen   I think the convexity of returns to intelligence is embedded in a multiplicative model, where the IQ returns only cash out for people good at all these other things. For a lot of geniuses, they just can't get out of bed in the morning, and you're stuck, and you should write them off.Dwarkesh Patel   So you cite the data that Sweden collects from everybody that enters the military there. The CEOs are apparently not especially smart. But one thing I found interesting in that same data was that Swedish soccer players are pretty smart. The better a soccer player is, the smarter they are. You've interviewed professional basketball players turned public intellectuals on your podcast. They sound extremely smart to me. What is going on there? Why, anecdotally, and with some limited amounts of evidence, does it seem that professional athletes are smarter than you would expect?Tyler Cowen   I'm a big fan of the view that top-level athletic performance is super cognitively intense and that most top athletes are really extraordinarily smart. I don't just mean smart on the court (though, obviously that), but smart more broadly. This is underrated. I think Michelle Dawson was the one who talked me into this, but absolutely, I'm with you all the way.Dwarkesh Patel   Do you think this is just mutational load or––Tyler Cowen   You actually have to be really smart to figure out things like how to lead a team, how to improve yourself, how to practice, how to outsmart the opposition, all these other things. Maybe it's not the only way to get there, but it is very G loaded. You certainly see some super talented athletes who just go bust. Or they may destroy themselves with drugs: there are plenty of tales like that, and you don't have to look hard. Dwarkesh Patel   Are there other areas where you wouldn't expect it to be G loaded but it actually is?Tyler Cowen   Probably, but there's so many! I just don't know, but sports is something in my life I followed. So I definitely have opinions about it. They seem incredibly smart to me when they're interviewed. They're not always articulate, and they're sort of talking themselves into biased exposure. But I heard Michael Jordan in the 90s, and I thought, “That guy's really smart.” So I think he is! Look at Charles Barkley. He's amazing, right? There's hardly anyone I'd rather listen to, even about talent, than Charles Barkley. It's really interesting. He's not that tall, you can't say, “oh, he succeeded. Because he's seven foot two,” he was maybe six foot four tops. And they called him the Round Mound of Rebound. And how did he do that? He was smart. He figured out where the ball was going. The weaknesses of his opponents, he had to nudge them the right way, and so on. Brilliant guy.Dwarkesh Patel   What I find really remarkable is that (not just with athletes, but in many other professions), if you interview somebody who is at the top of that field, they come off really really smart! For example, YouTubers and even sex workers.Tyler Cowen   So whoever is like the top gardener, I expect I would be super impressed by them.Spotting Talent (Counter)signalsDwarkesh Patel   Right. Now all your books are in some way about talent, right? Let me read you the following passage from An Economist Gets Lunch, and I want you to tell me how we can apply this insight to talent. “At a fancy fancy restaurant, the menu is well thought out. The time and attention of the kitchen are scarce. An item won't be on the menu unless there's a good reason for its presence. If it sounds bad, it probably tastes especially good?”Tyler Cowen   That's counter-signaling, right? So anything that is very weird, they will keep on the menu because it has a devoted set of people who keep on ordering it and appreciate it. That's part of the talent of being a chef, you can come up with such things. Dwarkesh Patel   How do we apply this to talent? Tyler Cowen   Well, with restaurants, you have selection pressure where you're only going to ones that have cleared certain hurdles. So this is true for talent only for talents who are established. If you see a persistent NBA player who's a very poor free throw shooter like Shaquille O'Neal was, you can more or less assume they're really good at something else. But for people who are not established, there's not the same selection pressure so there's not an analogous inference you can draw.Dwarkesh Patel   So if I show up to an Emergent Ventures conference, and I meet somebody, and they don't seem especially impressive with the first impression, then I should believe their work is especially impressive. Tyler Cowen Yes, absolutely, yes. Dwarkesh Patel   Okay, so my understanding of your book Creative Destruction is that maybe on average, cultural diversity will go down. But in special niches, the diversity and ingenuity will go up. Can I apply the same insight to talent? Maybe two random college grads will have similar skill sets over time, but if you look at people on the tails, will their skills and knowledge become even more specialized and even more diverse?Tyler Cowen   There are a lot of different presuppositions in your question. So first, is cultural diversity going up or down? That I think is multi-dimensional. Say different cities in different countries will be more like each other over time.. that said, the genres they produce don't have to become more similar. They're more similar in the sense that you can get sushi in each one. But novel cuisine in Dhaka and Senegal might be taking a very different path from novel cuisine in Tokyo, Japan. So what happens with cultural diversity.. I think the most reliable generalization is that it tends to come out of larger units. Small groups and tribes and linguistic groups get absorbed. Those people don't stop being creative and other venues, but there are fewer unique isolated cultures, and much more thickly diverse urban creativity. That would be the main generalization I would put forward. So if you wanted to apply that generalization to talent, I think in a funny way, we come back to my earlier point: talent just tends to be geographically extremely well clustered. That's not the question you asked, but it's how I would reconfigure the pieces of it.Dwarkesh Patel   Interesting. What do you suggest about finding talent in a globalized world? In particular, if it's cheaper to find talent because of the internet, does that mean that you should be selecting more mediocre candidates?Tyler Cowen   I think it means you should be more bullish on immigrants from Africa. It's relatively hard to get out of Africa to the United States in most cases. That's a sign the person put in a lot of effort and ability. Maybe an easy country to come here from would be Canada, all other things equal. Again, I'd want this to be measured. The people who come from countries that are hard to come from like India, actually, the numbers are fairly high, but the roots are mostly pretty gated.Dwarkesh Patel   Is part of the reason that talent is hard to spot and find today that we have an aging population?  So then we would have more capital, more jobs, more mentorship available for young people coming up, than there are young people.Tyler Cowen   I don't think we're really into demographic decline yet. Not in the United States. Maybe in Japan, that would be true. But it seems to me, especially with the internet, there's more 15-year-old talent today than ever before, by a lot, not just by little. You see this in chess, right? Where we can measure performance very well. There's a lot more young talent from many different places, including the US. So, aging hasn't mattered yet. Maybe for a few places, but not here.Dwarkesh Patel   What do you think will change in talent spotting as society becomes older?Tyler Cowen   It depends on what you mean by society. I think the US, unless it totally screws up on immigration, will always have a very seriously good flow of young people that we don't ever have to enter the aging equilibrium the way Japan probably already has. So I don't know what will change. Then there's work from a distance, there's hiring from a distance, funding from a distance. As you know, there's EV India, and we do that at a distance. So I don't think we're ever going to enter that world..Dwarkesh Patel   But then what does it look like for Japan? Is part of the reason that Japanese cultures and companies are arranged the way they are and do the recruitment the way they do linked to their demographics? Tyler Cowen   That strikes me as a plausible reason. I don't think I know enough to say, but it wouldn't surprise me if that turned out to be the case.Dwarkesh Patel   To what extent do you need a sort of “great man ethos” in your culture in order to empower the top talent? Like if you have too much political and moral egalitarianism, you're not going to give great people the real incentive and drive to strive to be great.Tyler Cowen   You've got to say “great man or great woman ethos”, or some other all-purpose word we wish to use. I worry much less about woke ideology than a lot of people I know. It's not my thing, but it's something young people can rebel against. If that keeps you down, I'm not so impressed by you. I think it's fine. Let the woke reign, people can work around them.Dwarkesh Patel   But overall, if you have a culture or like Europe, do you think that has any impact on––Tyler Cowen   Europe has not woken up in a lot of ways, right? Europe is very chauvinist and conservative in the literal sense, and often quite old fashioned depending on what you're talking about. But Europe, I would say, is much less woke than the United States. I wouldn't say that's their main problem, but you can't say, “oh, they don't innovate because they're too woke”, like hang out with some 63 year old Danish guys and see how woke you think they are once everyone's had a few drinks.Dwarkesh Patel   My question wasn't about wokeism. I just meant in general, if you have an egalitarian society.Tyler Cowen   I think of Europe as less egalitarian. I think they have bad cultural norms for innovation. They're culturally so non-egalitarian. Again, it depends where but Paris would be the extreme. There, everyone is classified right? By status, and how you need to wear your sweater the right way, and this and that. Now, how innovative is Paris? Actually, maybe more than people think. But I still think they have too few dimensions of status competition. That's a general problem in most of Europe–– too few dimensions of status competition, not enough room for the proverbial village idiot.Dwarkesh Patel   Interesting. You say in the book, that questions tend to degrade over time if you don't replace them. I find it interesting that Y Combinator has kept the same questions since they were started in 2005. And of course, your co-author was a partner at Y Combinator. Do you think that works for Y Combinator or do you think they're probably making a mistake?Tyler Cowen   I genuinely don't know. There are people who will tell you that Y Combinator, while still successful, has become more like a scalable business school and less like attracting all the top weirdos who do amazing things. Again, I'd want to see data before asserting that myself, but you certainly hear it a lot. So it could be that Y Combinator is a bit stale. But still in a good sense. Like Harvard is stale, right? It dates from the 17th century. But it's still amazing. MIT is stale. Maybe Y Combinator has become more like those groups.Dwarkesh Patel   Do you think that will happen to Emergent Ventures eventually?Tyler Cowen   I don't think so because it has a number of unique features built in from the front. So a very small number of evaluators too. It might grow a little bit, but it's not going to grow that much. I'm not paid to do it, so that really limits how much it's going to scale. There's not a staff that has to be carried where you're captured by the staff, there is no staff. There's a bit of free riding on staff who do other things, but there's no sense of if the program goes away, all my buddies on staff get laid off. No. So it's kind of pop up, and low cost of exit. Whenever that time comes.Dwarkesh Patel   Do you personally have questions that you haven't put in the book or elsewhere because you want them to be fresh? For asking somebody who's applying to her for the grant? Tyler Cowen   Well, I didn't when we wrote the book. So we put everything in there that we were thinking of, but over time, we've developed more. I don't generally give them out during interviews, because you have to keep some stock. So yeah, there's been more since then, but we weren't holding back at the time.Dwarkesh Patel It's like a comedy routine. You gotta write a new one each year.Tyler Cowen That's right. But when your shows are on the air, you do give your best jokes, right?Will Reading Cowen's Book Help You Win Emergent Ventures?Dwarkesh Patel Let's say someone applying to emergent ventures reads your book. Are they any better off? Or are they perhaps worse off because maybe they become misleading or have a partial view into what's required of them?Tyler Cowen   I hope they're not better off in a way, but probably they are. I hope they use it to understand their own talent better and present it in a better way. Not just to try to manipulate the system. But most people aren't actually that good at manipulating that kind of system so I'm not too worried.Dwarkesh Patel   In a sense, if they can manipulate the system, that's a positive signal of some kind.Tyler Cowen   Like, if you could fool me –– hey, what else have you got to say, you know? [laughs]Dwarkesh Patel   Are you worried that when young people will encounter you now, they're going to think of you as sort of a talent judge and a good one at that so they're maybe going to be more self aware than whether––Tyler Cowen   Yes. I worry about the effect of this on me. Maybe a lot of my interactions become less genuine, or people are too self conscious, or too stilted or something.Dwarkesh Patel   Is there something you can do about that? Or is that just baked in the gig?Tyler Cowen   I don't know, if you do your best to try to act genuine, whatever that means, maybe you can avoid it a bit or delay it at least a bit. But a lot of it I don't think you can avoid. In part, you're just cashing in. I'm 60 and I don't think I'll still be doing this when I'm 80. So if I have like 18 years of cashing in, maybe it's what I should be doing.Identifying talent earlyDwarkesh Patel   To what extent are the principles of finding talent timeless? If you're looking for let's say, a general for the French Revolution, how much of this does the advice change? Are the basic principles the same over time?Tyler Cowen   Well, one of the key principles is context. You need to focus on how the sector is different. But if you're doing that, then I think at the meta level the principles broadly stay the same.Dwarkesh Patel   You have a really interesting book about autism and systematizers. You think Napoleon was autistic?Tyler Cowen   I've read several biographies of him and haven't come away with that impression, but you can't rule it out. Who are the biographers? Now it gets back to our question of: How valuable is history? Did the biographers ever meet Napoleon? Well, some of them did, but those people had such weak.. other intellectual categories. The modern biography is written by Andrew Roberts, or whoever you think is good, I don't know. So how can I know?Dwarkesh Patel   Right? Again, the issue is that the details that stick in my mind from reading the biography are the ones that make him seem autistic, right?Tyler Cowen   Yes. There's a tendency in biographies to storify things, and that's dangerous too. Dwarkesh Patel   How general across a pool is talent or just competence of any kind? If you look at somebody like Peter Thiel–– investor, great executive, great thinker even, certainly Napoleon, and I think it was some mathematician either Lagrangian or Laplace, who said that he (Napoleon) could have been a mathematician if he wanted to. I don't know if that's true, but it does seem that the top achievers in one field seem to be able to move across fields and be top achievers in other fields. I

united states america american new york university amazon spotify history money canada world president chicago english europe google ai education england japan law nba san francisco podcasts travel africa russia ukraine ohio italy toronto german japanese mit italian putting brazil institute harvard talent middle east lebron james humility tokyo sweden bs republicans ceos manhattan democrats starbucks identifying islam nigeria poland michael jordan swedish renaissance constitution hiv long term bill gates operation wifi mark zuckerberg athens average mental illness results collapse older vc iq academia gop judaism ev brilliant buddha danish ea venice gdp napoleon jordan peterson big apple creatives inequality dmv roman empire world bank senegal caffeine libertarians suits rebound conquest hs mrna akron george soros charles barkley stripe vcs existential deceit french revolution y combinator peter thiel stressing skynet lifespan sam harris sam altman adderall of course sequoia ivermectin pessimism laplace agi idw kepler jerry west sats larping sergey haruki murakami true potential rationality herman melville pat riley peter singer christopher hitchens caplan dhaka paul graham marc andreessen joseph conrad effective altruism pnp maximilien robespierre watch tv taleb uchicago tyler cowen andrew roberts andrew sullivan scott alexander us state bryan caplan goodhart creative destruction fukuyama collison robin hanson second law senate banking committee rene girard sean parker samuel pepys public intellectuals david deutsch risk aversion marginal revolution patrick collison modafinil scott aaronson mercatus james boswell case against education hungarian jews rational voter like oh lagrangian round mound thomas schelling corn laws is london with london dwarkesh patel
Astro arXiv | all categories
Three-dimensional Lagrangian Coherent Structures in the Elliptic-Restricted Three-body Problem

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 25, 2022 0:50


Three-dimensional Lagrangian Coherent Structures in the Elliptic-Restricted Three-body Problem by Jack Tyler et al. on Sunday 25 September In the preliminary design of space missions it can be useful to identify regions of dynamics that drive the system's behaviour or separate qualitatively different dynamics. The Lagrangian Coherent Structure (LCS) has been widely used in the analysis of dynamical systems, and generalises the concept of the stable and unstable manifolds to systems with arbitrary time-dependence. However, the use of three-dimensional LCS in astrodynamics has thus far been limited. This paper presents the application of a new numerical method introduced by the authors, DA-LCS, to astrodynamics systems using the Elliptic-Restricted Three-body Problem (ER3BP) as a test case. We are able to construct the full, three-dimensional LCS associated with the Sun-Mars ER3BP directly from the variational theory of LCS even for numerically challenging initial conditions. The LCS is analysed in detail, showing how it in this case separates regions of qualitatively different behaviour without any a priori knowledge. The paper then studies the effect of integration time and the parameterisation of the initial condition on the LCS found. We highlight how round-off errors arise from limits of floating-point arithmetic in the most challenging test cases and provide mitigating strategies for avoiding these errors practically. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11561v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
Quasi-spiral solution to the mixed intracluster medium and the universal entropy profile of galaxy clusters

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 20, 2022 1:02


Quasi-spiral solution to the mixed intracluster medium and the universal entropy profile of galaxy clusters by Uri Keshet et al. on Tuesday 20 September Well-resolved galaxy clusters often show a large-scale quasi-spiral structure in deprojected density $rho$ and temperature $T$ fields, delineated by a tangential discontinuity known as a cold front, superimposed on a universal radial entropy profile with a linear $K(r)propto Trho^{-2/3}propto r$ adiabat. We show that a spiral structure provides a natural quasi-stationary solution for the mixed intracluster medium (ICM), introducing a modest pressure spiral that confines the locally buoyant or heavy plasma phases. The solution persists in the presence of uniform or differential rotation, and can accommodate both an inflow and an outflow. Hydrodynamic adiabatic simulations with perturbations that deposit angular momentum and mix the plasma thus asymptote to a self-similar spiral structure. We find similar spirals in Eulerian and Lagrangian simulations of 2D and 3D, merger and offset, clusters. The discontinuity surface is given in spherical coordinates ${r,theta,phi}$ by $phipropto Phi(r)$, where $Phi$ is the gravitational potential, combining a trailing spiral in the equatorial ($theta=pi/2$) plane and semicircles perpendicular to the plane, in resemblance of a snail shell. A local convective instability can develop between spiral windings, driving a modified global instability in sublinear $K(r)$ regions; evolved spirals thus imprint the observed $Kpropto r$ onto the ICM even after they dissipate. The spiral structure brings hot and cold phases to close proximity, suggesting that the observed fast outflows could sustain the structure even in the presence of radiative cooling. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.09259v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
Testing Modified Gravity Theories with Numerical Solutions of the External Field Effect in Rotationally Supported Galaxies

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 18, 2022 0:32


Testing Modified Gravity Theories with Numerical Solutions of the External Field Effect in Rotationally Supported Galaxies by Kyu-Hyun Chae et al. on Sunday 18 September The strong equivalence principle is violated by gravity theories of Milgromian dynamics (MOND) through the action of the external field effect. We test two different Lagrangian theories AQUAL and QUMOND based on their numerical solutions of the external field effect, by comparing two independent estimates of the mean external field strength of the nearby universe: a theory-deduced value from fitting the outer rotation curves of 114 galaxies and an empirical value from the large-scale distribution of cosmic baryons. The AQUAL-deduced external field strength from rotation curves agrees with that from the large-scale cosmic environment, while QUMOND-deduced value is somewhat higher. This suggests that AQUAL is likely to be preferred over QUMOND as an effective non-relativistic limit of a potential relativistic modified gravity theory. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07357v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
Testing Modified Gravity Theories with Numerical Solutions of the External Field Effect in Rotationally Supported Galaxies

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 18, 2022 0:39


Testing Modified Gravity Theories with Numerical Solutions of the External Field Effect in Rotationally Supported Galaxies by Kyu-Hyun Chae et al. on Sunday 18 September The strong equivalence principle is violated by gravity theories of Milgromian dynamics (MOND) through the action of the external field effect. We test two different Lagrangian theories AQUAL and QUMOND based on their numerical solutions of the external field effect, by comparing two independent estimates of the mean external field strength of the nearby universe: a theory-deduced value from fitting the outer rotation curves of 114 galaxies and an empirical value from the large-scale distribution of cosmic baryons. The AQUAL-deduced external field strength from rotation curves agrees with that from the large-scale cosmic environment, while QUMOND-deduced value is somewhat higher. This suggests that AQUAL is likely to be preferred over QUMOND as an effective non-relativistic limit of a potential relativistic modified gravity theory. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07357v1

Astro arXiv | all categories
Perfectly parallel cosmological simulations using spatial comoving Lagrangian acceleration

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 18, 2022 0:48


Perfectly parallel cosmological simulations using spatial comoving Lagrangian acceleration by Florent Leclercq et al. on Sunday 18 September Existing cosmological simulation methods lack a high degree of parallelism due to the long-range nature of the gravitational force, which limits the size of simulations that can be run at high resolution. To solve this problem, we propose a new, perfectly parallel approach to simulate cosmic structure formation, which is based on the spatial COmoving Lagrangian Acceleration (sCOLA) framework. Building upon a hybrid analytical and numerical description of particles' trajectories, our algorithm allows for an efficient tiling of a cosmological volume, where the dynamics within each tile is computed independently. As a consequence, the degree of parallelism is equal to the number of tiles. We optimised the accuracy of sCOLA through the use of a buffer region around tiles and of appropriate Dirichlet boundary conditions around sCOLA boxes. As a result, we show that cosmological simulations at the degree of accuracy required for the analysis of the next generation of surveys can be run in drastically reduced wall-clock times and with very low memory requirements. The perfect scalability of our algorithm unlocks profoundly new possibilities for computing larger cosmological simulations at high resolution, taking advantage of a variety of hardware architectures. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04925v4

Astro arXiv | all categories
ALMA Detection of Dust Trapping around Lagrangian Points in the LkCa 15 Disk

Astro arXiv | all categories

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 13, 2022 1:01


ALMA Detection of Dust Trapping around Lagrangian Points in the LkCa 15 Disk by Feng Long et al. on Tuesday 13 September We present deep high-resolution ($sim$50 mas, 8 au) ALMA 0.88 and 1.3 mm continuum observations of the LkCa 15 disk. The emission morphology shows an inner cavity and three dust rings at both wavelengths, but with slightly narrower rings at the longer wavelength. Along a faint ring at 42 au, we identify two excess emission features at $sim$10$sigma$ significance at both wavelengths: one as an unresolved clump and the other as an extended arc, separated by roughly 120 degrees in azimuth. The clump is unlikely to be a circumplanetary disk (CPD) as the emission peak shifts between the two wavelengths even after accounting for orbital motion. Instead, the morphology of the 42 au ring strongly resembles the characteristic horseshoe orbit produced in planet--disk interaction models, where the clump and the arc trace dust accumulation around Lagrangian points $L_{4}$ and $L_{5}$, respectively. The shape of the 42 au ring, dust trapping in the outer adjacent ring, and the coincidence of the horseshoe ring location with a gap in near-IR scattered light, are all consistent with the scenario of planet sculpting, with the planet likely having a mass between those of Neptune and Saturn. We do not detect point-like emission associated with a CPD around the putative planet location ($0.''27$ in projected separation from the central star at a position angle of $sim$60degr), with upper limits of 70 and 33 $mu$Jy at 0.88 and 1.3 mm, respectively, corresponding to dust mass upper limits of 0.02--0.03 $M_{oplus}$. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.05535v1

Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
ALMA Detection of Dust Trapping around Lagrangian Points in the LkCa 15 Disk

Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 13, 2022 1:01


ALMA Detection of Dust Trapping around Lagrangian Points in the LkCa 15 Disk by Feng Long et al. on Tuesday 13 September We present deep high-resolution ($sim$50 mas, 8 au) ALMA 0.88 and 1.3 mm continuum observations of the LkCa 15 disk. The emission morphology shows an inner cavity and three dust rings at both wavelengths, but with slightly narrower rings at the longer wavelength. Along a faint ring at 42 au, we identify two excess emission features at $sim$10$sigma$ significance at both wavelengths: one as an unresolved clump and the other as an extended arc, separated by roughly 120 degrees in azimuth. The clump is unlikely to be a circumplanetary disk (CPD) as the emission peak shifts between the two wavelengths even after accounting for orbital motion. Instead, the morphology of the 42 au ring strongly resembles the characteristic horseshoe orbit produced in planet--disk interaction models, where the clump and the arc trace dust accumulation around Lagrangian points $L_{4}$ and $L_{5}$, respectively. The shape of the 42 au ring, dust trapping in the outer adjacent ring, and the coincidence of the horseshoe ring location with a gap in near-IR scattered light, are all consistent with the scenario of planet sculpting, with the planet likely having a mass between those of Neptune and Saturn. We do not detect point-like emission associated with a CPD around the putative planet location ($0.''27$ in projected separation from the central star at a position angle of $sim$60degr), with upper limits of 70 and 33 $mu$Jy at 0.88 and 1.3 mm, respectively, corresponding to dust mass upper limits of 0.02--0.03 $M_{oplus}$. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.05535v1

Sonic Gravity
The Quantum Lagrangian Part 3: Dark Matter and Quantum Donuts

Sonic Gravity

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2022 38:24


Something crazy happened.  On the advice of a family friend, a Swiss physicist, that I create videos to illustrate the quantum Lagrangian, I derived the equations for black hole genesis and realized--and mathematically derived the truth that black holes are not holes at all--they are quantum donuts . . . and that is a fact!  You can see the videos at https://www.sonic-gravity.us/videos/As our trajectory drifts away from relentless scientific and mathematical exploration . . . to more organic things like quantum space donuts and raccoon murder you will know that you are orbiting in Sonic Gravity seeing the universe through the eyes of a madman.

Sonic Gravity
The Quantum Lagrangian Part 2: Where Einstein and the Standard Model Got it Wrong

Sonic Gravity

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 11, 2022 31:52


Enter my mind and see the universe through the eyes of a madman and know that Einstein's conclusion in Special Relativity that mass increases with velocity, and the Standard Model's misimpression that the Electron, the Muon, and the Tau particles are different particles are both wrong for the exact same reason.  Only understanding quantum gravity, the gravity of mass energy in time--akin to General Relativity as the gravity of mass energy in space, and knowing the nature of Dark Matter, reveals the truth in the mind of madness.

Sonic Gravity
Quantum Mechanics and the Quantum Lagrangian Part 1

Sonic Gravity

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 23, 2022 26:37


Orbit in Sonic Gravity and see the universe through the eyes of a madman.  Enter my mind and you will realize you learned quantum mechanics on the playground in Kindergarten and that a television game show from the 1970s was the key to unlocking perhaps the greatest mystery in theoretical physics, the solution to which has eluded the greatest minds in the human race for hundreds of years . . . and that is a fact.

Groovygords
L-Amp Lagrangian #Haiku #Poetry

Groovygords

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 16, 2021 1:56


This episode is also available as a blog post: https://ungroovygords.com/2021/12/15/l-amp-lagrangian-haiku-poetry/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/groovygords/message

TapirCast
#124. Gürültü Kavramı - İstatistiksel Mekanik (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B15) 05/12/2021

TapirCast

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 5, 2021 17:00


Doç. Dr. Serhan Yarkan ve Halil Said Cankurtaran'ın yer aldığı, Bilim Tarihi Serisi'nin gürültü odaklı yeni bölümünde, Rudolf Clausius'un, Ludwig Eduard Boltzmann'ın ve Josiah Willard Gibbs'in öncülüğünü yaptığı istatistiksel mekanik ve istatistiksel mekaniğin gürültü kavramı ile olan ilişkisi ele alınmıştır. Newtonian ve Lagrangian olarak bilinen, deterministik fizikten istatistiksel fiziğe geçişin nedenlerinin tartışıldığı bölümümüzde, ayrıca doğanın neden bu şekilde işlediği ve istatistiksel mekaniğin ilerleyen bölümlerde değineceğimiz kuantum mekaniği ile olan ilişkisine kısaca değinilmiştir. Keyifli dinlemeler. #84. Gürültü Kavramına Giriş: https://youtu.be/4nCgno6XDVM #66. George Gamow ve Bilim Anlatıcılığı (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B1: I. Kısım) - 25/10/2020: https://youtu.be/qIARyX8p8lg #68. Bilim Tarihi Serimize Bir Önsöz (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B2) - 08/11/2020: https://youtu.be/FVUc5tfYi7I #70. George Gamow - Bilimde Doğu ve Batı Blokları (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B3: II. Kısım) - 22/11/2020: https://youtu.be/7k_IRL_B8WA #71. Michael Faraday (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B4) - 29/11/2020: https://youtu.be/OtEQ0pI-baI #73. Kümeler Kuramı'nın Önemi ve Tarihsel Gelişimi (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B5: I. Kısım): https://youtu.be/pSksJkWK6wU #76. Kümeler Kuramı'nın Etkileri (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B6: II. Kısım): https://youtu.be/gtpdAUaCgzw #77. Kümeler Kuramı ve Hesaplama (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B7: III. Kısım): https://youtu.be/TMt_rUbE4M4 #78. Kümeler Kuramı'nın Kuraltanımazları (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B8: IV. Kısım) - 17/01/2021: https://youtu.be/qHMdAjr4lQ0 #79. Kümeler Kuramı'nın Günümüzdeki Kullanımı (Bilim Tarihi Serisi B9: V. Kısım) - 24/01/2021: https://youtu.be/WoF5_A7nKQM Apple Podcasts: @TapirCast, https://podcasts.apple.com/tr/podcast/tapircast/id1485098931 Spotfiy: @TapirCast, https://open.spotify.com/show/1QJduW17Sgvs1sofFgJN8L?si=5a71b32796d945e6 Tapir Lab. GitHub: @TapirLab, https://github.com/tapirlab/ Tapir Lab. Instagram: @tapirlab, https://www.instagram.com/tapirlab/ Tapir Lab. Twitter: @tapirlab, https://twitter.com/tapirlab Tapir Lab.: http://www.tapirlab.com

Eigenbros
Eigenbros ep 142 - Principle of Least Action

Eigenbros

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 26, 2021 63:09


Juan & Terence discuss the long avoided topic of the principle of least action and the euler lagrange equations. This is probably one of the most important subjects in physics. They discuss what the principle means and some of the finer points regarding it.

The Thesis Review
[34] Sasha Rush - Lagrangian Relaxation for Natural Language Decoding

The Thesis Review

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 20, 2021 68:12


Sasha Rush is an Associate Professor at Cornell Tech and researcher at Hugging Face. His research focuses on building NLP systems that are safe, fast, and controllable. Sasha's PhD thesis is titled, "Lagrangian Relaxation for Natural Language Decoding", which he completed in 2014 at MIT. We talk about his work in the thesis on decoding in NLP, how it connects with today, and many interesting topics along the way such as the role of engineering in machine learning, breadth vs. depth, and more. - Episode notes: https://cs.nyu.edu/~welleck/episode34.html - Follow the Thesis Review (@thesisreview) and Sean Welleck (@wellecks) on Twitter - Find out more info about the show at https://cs.nyu.edu/~welleck/podcast.html - Support The Thesis Review at www.patreon.com/thesisreview or www.buymeacoffee.com/thesisreview

Eigenbros
Eigenbros ep 123 - What is Quantum Field Theory?

Eigenbros

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 9, 2021 76:14


Juan & Terence explain what quantum field theory is and what several videos on the subject. David Tong, Dietterich Labs, and Zap Physics have videos in the podcast that demonstrate important aspects of the theory. This video goes over how to quantize the real free scalar field (Klein-Gordon).

Eigenbros
Eigenbros ep 112 - Understanding Yang Mills Theory

Eigenbros

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 16, 2021 60:13


Juan & Terence attempt to tackle the monster topic of Yang-Mills theory. Gauge Theory, topology, quantum field theory, differential geometry, group theory, and more all have a relationship with Yang-Mills theory.

ASC Workshops
Topological twists of non-Lagrangian theories, Part 2

ASC Workshops

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 6, 2021 72:20


ASC Workshop: Fields and Duality 2017

ASC Workshops
Topological twists of non-Lagrangian theories, Part 1

ASC Workshops

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 6, 2021 74:29


ASC Workshop: Fields and Duality 2017

Eigenbros
Eigenbros ep 104 - Top Equations in Physics

Eigenbros

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 19, 2021 62:22


Juan & Terence discuss what they believe to be the top four most important equations in physics. The euler-lagrange equations, einstein field equations, dirac equation, and the electromagnetic tensor

Drunkard's Walk
Lagrangian Point to ?

Drunkard's Walk

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 15, 2020 54:19


Will gravity hold Jethro and Matt in place or will they be able to walk on? Hopefully they get away and head off to a topic given by Ken Moser!

PaperPlayer biorxiv biophysics
Direct Measurement of Unsteady Microscale Stokes Flow Using Optically Driven Microspheres

PaperPlayer biorxiv biophysics

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 28, 2020


Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.10.28.354738v1?rss=1 Authors: Bruot, N., Cicuta, P., Gadelha, H., Goldstein, R. E., Kotar, J. E., Lauga, E., Nadal, F. Abstract: A growing body of work on the dynamics of eukaryotic flagella has noted that their oscillation frequencies are sufficiently high that the viscous penetration depth of unsteady Stokes flow is comparable to the scales over which flagella synchronize. Incorporating these effects into theories of synchronization requires an understanding of the global unsteady flows around oscillating bodies. Yet, there has been no precise experimental test on the microscale of the most basic aspects of such unsteady Stokes flow: the orbits of passive tracers and the position-dependent phase lag between the oscillating response of the fluid at a distant point and that of the driving particle. Here, we report the first such direct Lagrangian measurement of this unsteady flow. The method uses an array of 30 submicron tracer particles positioned by a time-shared optical trap at a range of distances and angular positions with respect to a larger, central particle, which is then driven by an oscillating optical trap at frequencies up to 400 Hz. In this microscale regime, the tracer dynamics is considerably simplified by the smallness of both inertial effects on particle motion and finite-frequency corrections to the Stokes drag law. The tracers are found to display elliptical Lissajous figures whose orientation and geometry are in agreement with a low-frequency expansion of the underlying dynamics, and the experimental phase shift between motion parallel and orthogonal to the oscillation axis exhibits a predicted scaling form in distance and angle. Possible implications of these results for synchronization dynamics are discussed. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info

PaperPlayer biorxiv biophysics
A physical theory of larval Drosophila behaviour

PaperPlayer biorxiv biophysics

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 25, 2020


Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.08.25.266163v1?rss=1 Authors: Loveless, J., Garner, A., Issa, A. R., Webb, B., Ohyama, T., Alonso, C. Abstract: All animal movement must ultimately be governed by physical laws. As a basis for understanding the interactions between the nervous system, musculature, body mechanics and the environment that govern behaviour in the fruit fly larva, we here develop an effective theory for the physics of its motion in three dimensions. We start by defining a set of fields which quantify stretching, bending and twisting along the larva's anteroposterior (AP) axis. We then perform a search in the space of possible physical theories that could govern these fields, by using symmetry considerations, stability requirements and physical reasoning to rule out possible terms in our theory's Lagrangian (which governs its energy-conservative physics) and Rayleigh function (which governs its energy-dissipative physics). We restrict attention to the physics that dominates at long-wavelengths, which allows us to arrive at a unique, simple theory of the larval midline, governed by a minimum of phenomenological parameters that capture both purely biomechanical as well as neuromuscular effects. Owing to the simplicity of our theory, we are able to derive most of our results analytically. The model makes strong quantitative predictions for the dynamics of peristalsis, rolling, and self-righting, and also successfully predicts statistical properties of these behaviours and of unbiased substrate exploration. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info

Belitopia
S1E9 – Lunar Communications Network

Belitopia

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 18, 2020 28:37


We landed on the moon. We built a habitat on the moon. We are living in earth orbit, and we are living in lunar orbit. We are living on the far side of the moon, with no visibility to earth...ever. With four space stations, two lunar bases, and over 35 crewed trips between the earth and the moon, how can we possibly communicate with each other over the long term? How can we keep all these missions in communications with earth? The answer, is a communications network that grows and becomes more sophisticated as time goes on. By the end of the Apollo-era, we can communicate over a half million miles without the requirement that we be line of sight with an earth based antenna. This required a sophisticated network of communications satellites and technologies…and a bit of luck. This is the Apollo Lunar Communications Network. In the world of Belitopia. LinksEpisode Details ( https://belitopia.com/109 (https://belitopia.com/109) ) Belitopia Information from this Episode ( https://belitopia.com/lunarnet (https://belitopia.com/lunarnet) ) Lagrangian Points ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point) ) Lunar Fronzen Orbits ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frozen_orbit#Lunar_frozen_orbits (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frozen_orbit#Lunar_frozen_orbits) ) Precession ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession) ) Lunar Wobble - NASA ( https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/10836 (https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/10836) ) Lunar Libration - Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libration#Lunar_libration (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libration#Lunar_libration) ) Earth Rise - Famous picture from Apollo 8 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthrise (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthrise) ) As we near the end of season one, we’re going to try a slightly new format for this episode. We aren’t going to use the future documentary format, rather we are going to stay in a current day conversation. In this episode, we’re going to be talking about the fledgling communications network being built in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s to support the various Apollo missions we have previously discussed in season 1. We’ve talked about part of this network briefly in episode 7, when we talked about the lunar base on the far side of the moon...the BLA base. But there’s a lot more to that network than you imagine, and a lot more to lunar communications in general than you might think. This network was the first such extra-earthly communications network, and it was developed during the early days of the space race. Global Earth Dish NetworkDuring the early Apollo days, during our first missions to the moon, one of the initial communications problems that had to be solved was how do you keep the moon-bound Apollo space craft in communications with earth, when the earth keeps rotating. That means, mission control, in Houston, Texas, was only in line of site of the Apollo space craft for relatively short periods of time every day — a few hours at most. In order for Houston to maintain a 24 hour a day communications with the moon-bound space craft, a series of satellite communications stations were built around the globe. As the earth rotated, different stations around the globe were in line of sight communications with the Apollo spacecraft at different times during the day. These stations were in direct communications with Houston via landline communications channels...essentially phone calls. Each station, when it was their turn, would relay signals between the Apollo space craft and mission control. The result was a virtual 24 hour a day continuous connection between Houston and the Apollo spacecraft. This was a great start. But as the 1960s moved into the 1970s more and more spacecraft were put into space between the earth and moon. This put a drain on this earth bound satellite network. Plus, the earth bound... Support this podcast

Honest Andy's Discount Moon Show
E008 - Honest Andy's Discount Moon Show - We need to talk about Phobos

Honest Andy's Discount Moon Show

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 10, 2020 59:59


Andy and Rick talk discuss the latest moon news and take a deep dive into the conspiracies surrounding Phobos Show Notes ------------------- Talking Points ------------------- 02:44 - Moon Gold Digger - https://tinyurl.com/s45gete 15:54 - Change'5 - https://tinyurl.com/r5kuegu 21:21 - Ganymede - https://tinyurl.com/swdaldp 24:30 - New Moon Alert - https://tinyurl.com/w2vlos4 32:40 - Very Local Moon News - https://tinyurl.com/usa5wqb 36:30 - Moon of the Month - https://tinyurl.com/yyzcd48h 41:50 - Let's Talk about Phobos - https://tinyurl.com/q9ardy6 -------------------------------------- Miscellaneous Show notes -------------------------------------- 03:55 - Prospector - https://tinyurl.com/jv7ng4p 11:40 - Stroud - https://tinyurl.com/sqargel 23:10 - Saturn's North Pole - https://tinyurl.com/pb6w2vf 26:50 - Lagrangian points - https://tinyurl.com/wxssapj 30:10 - Elon Musk's Tesla - https://tinyurl.com/y2khlxsy 35:50 - Moon Museum - https://tinyurl.com/cp5w8ja 39:14 - Christina Agulara Tweet - https://tinyurl.com/urlp3hj 45:00 - Stickney Crater - https://tinyurl.com/u5xd8f7 46:01 - Study Beats - https://tinyurl.com/y6abvmdc 46:22 - Phobian Grooves - https://tinyurl.com/yamadmug 49:30 - Phobos Boulder theory - https://tinyurl.com/vv2jhph 50:40 - Phobos Monolith - https://tinyurl.com/ukgxlg7 51:05 - Hollow Phobos - https://tinyurl.com/tp556og 53:19 - Soviet Phobos Probes - https://tinyurl.com/yxee6u98 54:00 - Phobos 2 Photos - https://tinyurl.com/yx5pm6yz 54:10 - Nasa Link to Phobos 2 Data - https://tinyurl.com/vlgcmua 54:40 - The Phobos Incident - https://tinyurl.com/vvzrmmn 56:30 - Photo of Phobos' Shadow - https://tinyurl.com/wpdbknz ------------------- Show Credits ------------------- Sting between topics from: freesound.org/people/newagesoup/sounds/339343/ Show theme courtesy of MusicManiac301: https://soundcloud.com/musicmaniac301/tv-theme-style-the-winner

Belitopia
S1E8 – Lunar Skylab

Belitopia

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 4, 2020 29:34


The United States was forming quite a bit of a space complex. They had space stations in low earth orbit, learning how to live and work in space, eventually to establish a permanent presence in low earth orbit. They had bases on the surface of the moon. Learning how to live and work on the lunar surface, 239,000 miles from earth, and in the case of the BLA base, not even visible from the surface of the earth. They even had satellites far from earth at the earth-moon Lagrangian points. All of this has been discussed in past episodes of Belitopia. But what was left was an orbital presence above the surface of the moon. We’ve had many ships that have orbited the moon. Every Apollo mission that went to the moon, orbited the moon for some period of time. Yet, given the constraints of the Apollo command module, there wasn’t a lot of opportunity for long term study of the lunar surface from lunar orbit. This was the purpose of the Lunar Skylab program. Provide an environment for the long term study of the lunar surface from low lunar orbit. This is…Lunar Skylab. Welcome to Belitopia. Links Episode Details ( https://belitopia.com/108 (https://belitopia.com/108) ) Belitopia Information from this Episode ( https://belitopia.com/lunarskylab (https://belitopia.com/lunarskylab) ) Skylab + Episode ( https://belitopia.com/105 (https://belitopia.com/105) ) Apollo Lunar Bases p1 Episode ( https://belitopia.com/106 (https://belitopia.com/106) ) Apollo Lunar Bases p2 Episode ( https://belitopia.com/107 (https://belitopia.com/107) ) Lunar Frozen Orbits ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frozen_orbit#Lunar_frozen_orbits (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frozen_orbit#Lunar_frozen_orbits) ) Topic Introduction The goal of the Lunar Skylab program was to send a Skylab-like space station into *lunar* orbit — 60 miles above the surface of the moon — then occupy the station with long duration crews that could study the lunar surface in greater detail, along with learn how to live in zero G far from the surface of the earth. In real life, this program never took place. There was never a space station built beyond low earth orbit. But in Belitopia, we deployed a Skylab-like space station into Lunar orbit in order to facilitate the study of the lunar surface, to facilitate telescopic study of the space without the worry of earth’s atmosphere, and explore alternative transportation mechanisms between lunar orbit and the lunar surface. What follows is a fictional documentary about the Lunar Skylab space station. The documentary is presented as if it takes place in the year 2040, some 70 years after these events took place. The documentary, titled “Our World in Space”, describes the construction and occupation of this lunar space station. The documentary describes these events as a future historical record of past events. While fiction, it’s based on research into how such a station may have been constructed, what it would have been used for, and how it would have benefited humankind. Theis documentary is about the Lunar Skylab program and its impact on our long term presence in space. The Lunar Skylab program, in the world of Belitopia. Documentary Hello, and welcome to “Our World in Space — The Lunar Skylab Program”. The Lunar Skylab. A space station 60 miles above the lunar surface. The first long duration human habitat to be built in space that was not in low earth orbit. The technology wasn’t hard for the station itself. The space station was essentially identical to the Skylab I space station, except it utilized many technology improvements that were built into Skylab III. The hard part was, how do we put it into lunar orbit? After all, the original skylab was launched into low earth orbit using a Saturn V rocket, at least the first two stages of it. That was easy. But now, the goal was to send the same station not 100 miles above the surface of the earth, but... Support this podcast

Belitopia
S1E7 – Apollo Lunar Bases p2

Belitopia

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 21, 2020 29:51


Not long after the end of the Apollo lunar landings, it was time for the next step in lunar exploration. There was belief, and some evidence from the experiments that were performed on the lunar surface during the Apollo missions, that there were minerals...water...and other scientifically useful resources on the lunar surface. There was also a concern that the Soviet Union would eventually land on the lunar surface, and attempt to claim all or part of it as their territory. So, the space race continued. On this front, the race was to the first long duration habitation of the lunar surface, and eventual lunar colonization. The United States created a habitat, a base, designed for the long term exploration and habitation of the lunar surface. In fact, they created two such bases. This allowed the Americans to explore the scientific wealth that awaited them on the lunar surface, as well as make a long term claim of the lunar surface before the Russians. While this is not what happened in real life, it is what happened in the fictional world we have created. This is…the Apollo Moon Bases — part 2. Welcome to Belitopia. Links and More Information Belitopia Website (https://belitopia.com/) Apollo Lunar Base - Belitopia (https://belitopia.com/lunarbase) Apollo Moon Bases p2 Episode (https://belitopia.com/107) Apollo Moon Bases p1 Episode (https://belitopia.com/106) Tycho Crater - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tycho_(lunar_crater)) ) Tsiolkovskiy Crater - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovskiy_(crater)) Lagrangian Point (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point) Please support our show (https://belitopia.com/support/) IntroductionNot long after the end of the Apollo lunar landings, it was time for the next step in lunar exploration. There was belief, and some evidence from the experiments that were performed on the lunar surface, that there were minerals, water, and other scientifically useful resources on the lunar surface. There was also a concern that the Soviet Union would eventually land on the lunar surface. As it turns out, the Soviet Union had given up on the quest for the lunar surface, and instead had focused on exploring and conquering near earth orbit. This was something we talked about in a previous episode, episode number 5, on Skylab. However, the United States was not aware of this fact, and they continued to work under the assumption that the Soviet Union was still trying to land on the moon, so they could claim as much of the lunar surface as possible. So, given this information, the United States turned away from spot landings of single Apollo LMs for relatively short stays on the lunar surface, towards developing and building their first long duration base on the lunar surface. The purpose of the base was to provide a long term habitation of the lunar surface by Americans. In fact, two bases were built. This is the story of those bases. In part 1, we discussed the design and layout of the Tycho base, which was located near Tycho crater, the same location of the famous monolith found on the Lunar surface in the Stanley Kubrick movie 2001 A Space Odyssey and Arthur C Clark’s book of the same name. We discussed how the base was delivered to the lunar surface in four separate pods, and how those pods were assembled on the lunar surface. In Part 2 we will continue our documentary “Our World In Space”, which takes place in the world of Belitopia in the year 2040, 65 years after the bases were created. We will continue this documentary to discuss the complex lunar transport system put in place to shuttle crews back and forth not only to the Tycho base, but the second base that was also created. We’ll discuss one of the side effects of this transportation system was the formation of an LM graveyard. We’ll also talk about the emergency procedures in place to save the base occupants in case of a problem, and how Support this podcast

Sommerfeld Lecture Series (ASC)
Theory Colloquium: When a Symmetry Breaks

Sommerfeld Lecture Series (ASC)

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 3, 2019 85:43


Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking is a very universal concept applicable for a wide range of subjects: crystal, superfluid, neutron stars, Higgs boson, magnets, and many others. Yet there is a variety in the spectrum of gapless excitations even when the symmetry breaking patterns are the same. We unified all known examples of internal symmetries in a single-line Lagrangian of the low-energy effective theory. In addition, we now have a better understanding of what happens with spacetime symmetries, and predict gaps for certain states exactly based on symmetries alone.

Endless Horizons: Space Simplified
Episode 19: Lagrangian Points

Endless Horizons: Space Simplified

Play Episode Listen Later May 1, 2019 5:30


This episode is about Langrange Points, an aspect of orbital mechanics. This is based on an essay written by Neil Degrasse Tyson, titled “The Five Points of Lagrange”.

MCMP – Philosophy of Science
How Almost Everything in Space-time Theory Is Illuminated by Simple Particle Physics: The Neglected Case of Massive Scalar Gravity

MCMP – Philosophy of Science

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 18, 2019 59:13


J. Brian Pitts (Cambridge) gives a talk at the MCMP Colloquium (6 February, 2013) titled "How Almost Everything in Space-time Theory Is Illuminated by Simple Particle Physics: The Neglected Case of Massive Scalar Gravity". Abstract: Both particle physics from the 1920s-30s and the 1890s Seeliger-Neumann modification of Newtonian gravity suggest considering a “mass term,” an additional algebraic term in the gravitational potential. The “graviton mass” gives gravity a finite range. The smooth massless limit implies underdetermination. In 1914 Nordström generalized Newtonian gravity to fit Special Relativity. Why not do to Nordström what Seeliger and Neumann did to Newton? Einstein started in setting up a (faulty!) analogy for his cosmological constant Λ. Scalar gravities, though not empirically viable since the 1919 bending of light observations, provide a useful test bed for tensor theories like General Relativity. Massive scalar gravity, though not completed in a timely way, sheds philosophical light on most issues in contemporary and 20th century space-time theory. A mass term shrinks the symmetry group to that of Special Relativity and violates Einstein's principles (general covariance, general relativity, equivalence and Mach) in empirically small but conceptually large ways. Geometry is a poor guide to massive scalar gravities in comparison to detailed study of the field equation or Lagrangian. Matter sees a conformally flat metric because gravity distorts volumes while leaving the speed of light alone, but gravity sees the whole flat metric due to the mass term. Largely with Poincaré (pace Eddington), one can contemplate a “true” flat geometry differing from what material rods and clocks disclose. But questions about “true” geometry need no answer and tend to block inquiry. Presumptively one should expect analogous results for the tensor (massive spin 2) case modifying Einstein’s equations. A case to the contrary was made only in 1970-72: an apparently fatal dilemma involving either instability or empirical falsification appeared. But dark energy measurements since 1999 cast some doubt on General Relativity (massless spin 2) at long distances. Recent calculations (2000s, some from 2010) show that instability can be avoided and that empirical falsification likely can be as well, making massive spin 2 gravity a serious rival for GR. Particle physics can let philosophers proportion belief to evidence over time, rather than suffering from unconceived alternatives.

Three Times Faster
Episode 0001: Podcast Rising

Three Times Faster

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 6, 2019 95:54


Welcome to Three Times Faster: A Gundam Podcast. HAPPY BIRTHDAY, GUNDAM! Join our hosts Justin Meader and Sean Fitzgerald as they recap the first five episodes of Mobile Suit Gundam. Justin promotes hiding in cowardice, talks about the difference between a Stanford torus and an O'Neill cylinder, and pretends to understand Lagrangian points. Meanwhile, Sean laughs at the Federation's brazenness, and attempts to justify his art school education by drawing a distinction between "pink" and "salmon". Kids, ask your parents what a View-Master is. CURRENT SLAP COUNT: 2 Three Times Faster is hosted by Anchor and is available on podcast services everywhere. You can follow us on Twitter, Twitch, Facebook, and Instagram @thevoxelist. Please direct your questions, comments, and complaints to podcast@thevoxelist.com. The Three Times Faster theme is an original composition by Justin Meader, and contains samples from the song "The Red Comet" by Takeo Watanabe & Yushi Matsuyama from the official Mobile Suit Gundam Soundtrack. "Gundam", all associated names, images, and trademarks are copyright of Sunrise Inc. and Bandai. The Voxelist and Three Times Faster are in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Sunrise Inc. or Bandai, or any of its subsidiaries, employees, or associates. Three Times Faster offers no suggestion that it an "official" product, or sanctioned by the owner or any licensees of the aforementioned trademarks. It also makes no claim to own Gundam or any of its related copyrights or trademarks. The Voxelist and Three Times Faster are copyright The Voxelist, LLC. Any copyrighted content contained within episodes of Three Times Faster is used in accordance with Fair Use as detailed under Section 107 of Title 17 (Copyright Law of the United States). Any inquiries should be directed to podcast@thevoxelist.com. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/threetimesfaster/support

The Reality Check
TRC #507: Review: Stumbling On Happiness + 5MWaA: Lagrangian Points + Ingesting Collagen Has Skin Benefits?

The Reality Check

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 22, 2018 23:46


Darren gives us his review of Daniel Gilbert’s book ‘Stumbling On Happiness’.  Next, we offer up another episode of a new crossover podcast with Stuart Robbins called “5 minutes with an astronomer.” In this episode Stuart tackles Lagrangian points.  Last, Cristina looks into the evidence for claims that ingesting collagen has benefits for your skin.

Wim Demeere Podcast
WDP 010: Interview with Terry Trahan

Wim Demeere Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 29, 2017 64:52


In today's episode, I interview Terry Trahan, a good friend and an amazing instructor. Terry has "led an interesting life", to put it midly and he speaks from not only in-depth training when it comes to violence, but also from hard-earned and dearly paid for experience. He's one of those people I have a blanket endorsement for: if you have the chance to train with him, do so. Enjoy the podcast! http://www.wimsblog.com/2017/12/podcast-episode-010-interview-with-terry-trahan Show Notes: 1. Self-defense and legal consequences: In the Name of Self-Defense: What it costs. When it's worth it: http://amzn.to/2BTsV0o Facing Violence: Preparing for the Unexpected: http://amzn.to/2BUl8iQ 2. First Aid training: Lone Star Medics: https://www.facebook.com/lonestarmedics/ Journal of Special Operations Medicine Tactical Combat Casualty Care: https://www.jsomonline.org/TCCC.html Blow Out Kit: http://amzn.to/2DvlwVq 3. Society: The beach at Shelter Cove: https://goo.gl/maps/bF1GPTUSdDm The Newsroom speech: https://youtu.be/1zqOYBabXmA Lagrange Point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point 4. Knives: Spyderco knives: http://amzn.to/2DyJejJ Böker knives: http://amzn.to/2Ejanby Fred Perrin knives: http://amzn.to/2EilotU 5. Seminars: Masters of Mayhem Inaugural Seminar: https://www.facebook.com/events/168058673801123/ Violence Dynamics: https://www.facebook.com/violencedynamics/ 6. Terry Trahan online: On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/weaselcraft/ Conflict Manager: https://www.facebook.com/conflictmanagermonthly/ Thanks for listening! Please like, share and leave a review! If you want to support the podcast while also getting access to loads of unique content, go to my Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/wimdemeere Subscribe to the podcast and automatically get the latest episode: iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/wim-demeere-podcast/id1291566457?mt=2 Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/wim-demeere-podcast Get in touch: New book/video email notification list: http://www.wimdemeere.com/notification/ My blog: http://www.wimsblog.com/ Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/WimDemeerePage/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wimdemeere/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/wimdemeere Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/ptccm  

ultrawizardsword
david sylvester - the lagrangian point

ultrawizardsword

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 6, 2015 122:54


no tracklist available.

lagrangian david sylvester
Modellansatz - English episodes only

This episode discusses the Born-Infeld model for Electromagnetodynamics. Here, the standard model are the Maxwell equations coupling the interaction of magnetic and electric field with the help of a system of partial differential equations. This is a well-understood classical system. But in this classical model, one serious drawback is that the action of a point charge (which is represented by a Dirac measure on the right-hand side) leads to an infinite energy in the electric field which physically makes no sense. On the other hand, it should be possible to study the electric field of point charges since this is how the electric field is created. One solution for this challenge is to slightly change the point of view in a way similar to special relativity theory of Einstein. There, instead of taking the momentum () as preserved quantity and Lagrange parameter the Lagrangian is changed in a way that the bound for the velocity (in relativity the speed of light) is incorporated in the model. In the electromagnetic model, the Lagrangian would have to restrict the intensity of the fields. This was the idea which Borne and Infeld published already at the beginning of the last century. For the resulting system it is straightforward to calculate the fields for point charges. But unfortunately it is impossible to add the fields for several point charges (no superposition principle) since the resulting theory (and the PDE) are nonlinear. Physically this expresses, that the point charges do not act independently from each other but it accounts for certain interaction between the charges. Probably this interaction is really only important if charges are near enough to each other and locally it should be only influenced by the charge nearest. But it has not been possible to prove that up to now. The electrostatic case is elliptic but has a singularity at each point charge. So no classical regularity results are directly applicable. On the other hand, there is an interesting interplay with geometry since the PDE occurs as the mean curvature equation of hypersurfaces in the Minkowski space in relativity. The evolution problem is completely open. In the static case we have existence and uniqueness without really looking at the PDEs from the way the system is built. The PDE should provide at least qualitative information on the electric field. So if, e.g., there is a positive charge there could be a maximum of the field (for negative charges a minimum - respectively), and we would expect the field to be smooth outside these singular points. So a Lipschitz regular solution would seem probable. But it is open how to prove this mathematically. A special property is that the model has infinitely many inherent scales, namely all even powers of the gradient of the field. So to understand maybe asymptotic limits in theses scales could be a first interesting step. Denis Bonheure got his mathematical education at the Free University of Brussels and is working there as Professor of Mathematics at the moment. Literature and additional material M. Kiessling: Electromagnetic Field Theory Without Divergence Problems 1, The Born Legacy, Journal of Statistical Physics, Volume 116, Issue 1, pp 1057-1122, 2004. M. Kiessling: Electromagnetic Field Theory Without Divergence Problems 2, A Least Invasively Quantized Theory, Journal of Statistical Physics, Volume 116, Issue 1, pp 1123-1159, 2004. M. Kiessling: On the motion of point defects in relativistic fields, in Quantum Field Theory and Gravity, Conceptual and Mathematical Advances in the Search for a Unified Framework, Finster e.a. (ed.), Springer, 2012. Y. Brenier: Some Geometric PDEs Related to Hydrodynamics and Electrodynamics, ICM Vol. III pp 761--772, 2002.

Modellansatz
Electrodynamics

Modellansatz

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 29, 2015 29:16


This episode discusses the Born-Infeld model for Electromagnetodynamics. Here, the standard model are the Maxwell equations coupling the interaction of magnetic and electric field with the help of a system of partial differential equations. This is a well-understood classical system. But in this classical model, one serious drawback is that the action of a point charge (which is represented by a Dirac measure on the right-hand side) leads to an infinite energy in the electric field which physically makes no sense. On the other hand, it should be possible to study the electric field of point charges since this is how the electric field is created. One solution for this challenge is to slightly change the point of view in a way similar to special relativity theory of Einstein. There, instead of taking the momentum () as preserved quantity and Lagrange parameter the Lagrangian is changed in a way that the bound for the velocity (in relativity the speed of light) is incorporated in the model. In the electromagnetic model, the Lagrangian would have to restrict the intensity of the fields. This was the idea which Borne and Infeld published already at the beginning of the last century. For the resulting system it is straightforward to calculate the fields for point charges. But unfortunately it is impossible to add the fields for several point charges (no superposition principle) since the resulting theory (and the PDE) are nonlinear. Physically this expresses, that the point charges do not act independently from each other but it accounts for certain interaction between the charges. Probably this interaction is really only important if charges are near enough to each other and locally it should be only influenced by the charge nearest. But it has not been possible to prove that up to now. The electrostatic case is elliptic but has a singularity at each point charge. So no classical regularity results are directly applicable. On the other hand, there is an interesting interplay with geometry since the PDE occurs as the mean curvature equation of hypersurfaces in the Minkowski space in relativity. The evolution problem is completely open. In the static case we have existence and uniqueness without really looking at the PDEs from the way the system is built. The PDE should provide at least qualitative information on the electric field. So if, e.g., there is a positive charge there could be a maximum of the field (for negative charges a minimum - respectively), and we would expect the field to be smooth outside these singular points. So a Lipschitz regular solution would seem probable. But it is open how to prove this mathematically. A special property is that the model has infinitely many inherent scales, namely all even powers of the gradient of the field. So to understand maybe asymptotic limits in theses scales could be a first interesting step. Denis Bonheure got his mathematical education at the Free University of Brussels and is working there as Professor of Mathematics at the moment. Literature and additional material M. Kiessling: Electromagnetic Field Theory Without Divergence Problems 1, The Born Legacy, Journal of Statistical Physics, Volume 116, Issue 1, pp 1057-1122, 2004. M. Kiessling: Electromagnetic Field Theory Without Divergence Problems 2, A Least Invasively Quantized Theory, Journal of Statistical Physics, Volume 116, Issue 1, pp 1123-1159, 2004. M. Kiessling: On the motion of point defects in relativistic fields, in Quantum Field Theory and Gravity, Conceptual and Mathematical Advances in the Search for a Unified Framework, Finster e.a. (ed.), Springer, 2012. Y. Brenier: Some Geometric PDEs Related to Hydrodynamics and Electrodynamics, ICM Vol. III pp 761--772, 2002.

MCMP – Philosophy of Physics
Changing Observables in Canonical General Relativity from Hamiltonian-Lagrangian Equivalence

MCMP – Philosophy of Physics

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 8, 2015 39:45


J. Brian Pitts (Cambridge) gives a talk at the Workshop on the Problem of Time in Perspective (3-4 July, 2015) titled "Changing Observables in Canonical General Relativity from Hamiltonian-Lagrangian Equivalence". Abstract: Is change missing in classical canonical General Relativity? If one insists on Hamiltonian-Lagrangian equivalence, then there is Hamiltonian change just when there is no time-like Killing vector field. Change has seemed missing partly due to Dirac’s belief that a first-class constraint, especially a primary, generates a gauge transformation. Pons showed that Dirac’s argument stops too soon: working to second order in time brings in first-class secondaries and hence the gauge generator G, a tuned sum of first-class constraints used by Anderson and Bergmann (1951) and recovered by Mukunda, Castellani et al. from the 1980s. I observe that trouble happens immediately: a first-class primary constraint generates an illegal change of initial data in GR, Maxwell and Yang-Mills. Dirac’s subtractive derivation misses it by cancellation; confusion between the electric field E(dA) and canonical momenta p (auxiliary fields in the canonical action int dt (p dot{q}-H) also obscures the problem. Dirac’s conjecture that a first-class secondary constraint generates a gauge transformation rests on a false assumption. Looking for gauge symmetries of the canonical action, one finds that the gauge generator G changes the action by at most a boundary term, but an isolated first-class constraint does not. The gauge generator G generates spatio-temporal coordinate transformations (not just spatial ones) for the space-time metric (not just the spatial metric). But are there locally varying _observables_ in canonical General Relativity? Hamiltonian-Lagrangian equivalence guarantees that Hamiltonian observables are equivalent on-shell to Lagrangian observables. (Historically, Lagrangian-inequivalent observables may have arisen within Bergmann’s school due to novel postulation in Bergmann-Schiller 1953.) With first-class constraints exposed as not generating gauge transformations, observables’ Poisson brackets should be taken with the gauge generator G, as noted by Pons, Salisbury and Sundermeyer. Heeding Einstein’s point-coincidence argument excludes primitive point individuation and thus active diffeomorphisms in favor of (4-d) tensor calculus. Kuchař’s unsystematic waiver of the vanishing Poisson brackets condition to permit change has a more principled extension: observables should be internally gauge _invariant_ (0 Poisson bracket with G for Maxwell, Yang-Mills, etc.) but externally gauge _covariant_. Hence the Poisson bracket with the coordinate-changing G should be the Lie derivative, indeed the Lie derivative of a geometric object (on-shell). For GR with no matter gauge group, observables are (on-shell) space-time geometric objects (components in coordinates with a transformation law). Hence the space-time metric and its concomitants (connection, curvature, etc.) are locally varying observables. Questions regarding Legendre projectability when an internal gauge group is also present and regarding the mixed supergravity transformations are noted. Velocity-dependent gauge transformations call for phase space extended by time---“phase space-time”; GR’s Lie derivative is an example. Vacuum GR’s phase space-time has 20 infinity^3 + 1 dimensions and 8 infinity^3 first-class constraints; one should not have expected a reduced phase _space_ description of a theory with many-fingered time. Classical clarity might be of some use in quantization.

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 05/05
Effective actions for F-theory compactifications and tensor theories

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 05/05

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 30, 2014


In this thesis we study the low-energy effective dynamics emerging from a class of F-theory compactifications in four and six dimensions. We also investigate six-dimensional supersymmetric quantum field theories with self-dual tensors, motivated by the problem of describing the long-wavelength regime of a stack of M5-branes in M-theory. These setups share interesting common features. They both constitute examples of intrinsically non-perturbative physics. On the one hand, in the context of F-theory the non-perturbative character is encoded in the geometric formulation of this class of string vacua, which allows the complexified string coupling to vary in space. On the other hand, the dynamics of a stack of multiple M5-branes flows in the infrared to a novel kind of superconformal field theories in six dimensions - commonly referred to as (2,0) theories - that are expected to possess no perturbative weakly coupled regime and have resisted a complete understanding so far. In particular, no Lagrangian description is known for these models. The strategy we employ to address these two problems is also analogous. A recurring Leitmotif of our work is a transdimensional treatment of the system under examination: in order to extract information about dynamics in $d$ dimensions we consider a (d-1)-dimensional setup. As far as F-theory compactifications are concerned, this is a consequence of the duality between M-theory and F-theory, which constitutes our main tool in the derivation of the effective action of F-theory compactifications. We apply it to six-dimensional F-theory vacua, obtained by taking the internal space to be an elliptically fibered Calabi-Yau threefold, but we also employ it to explore a novel kind of F-theory constructions in four dimensions based on manifolds with Spin(7) holonomy. With reference to six-dimensional (2,0) theories, the transdimensional character of our approach relies in the idea of studying these theories in five dimensions. Indeed, we propose a Lagrangian that is formulated in five dimensions but has the potential to capture the six-dimensional interactions of (2,0) theories. This investigation leads us to explore in closer detail the relation between physics in five and in six dimensions. One of the outcomes of our exploration is a general result for one-loop corrections to Chern-Simons couplings in five dimensions.

MCMP – Philosophy of Physics
New Work on the Problem of Time

MCMP – Philosophy of Physics

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 21, 2014 90:05


Oliver Pooley (Oxford) gives a talk at the MCMP Colloquium (22 January, 2014) titled "New Work on the Problem of Time". Abstract: A central aspect of the "Problem of Time" in canonical general relativity is the result of applying to the theory Dirac's seemingly well-established method of identifying gauge transformations in constrained Hamiltonian theories. This "orthodox" move identifies transformations generated by the first-class constraints as mere gauge. Applied to GR the strategy yields the result that the genuine physical magnitudes of the theory (so identified) do not take on different values at different times. In the context of quantum gravity, this orthodoxy underwrites the derivation of the timeless Wheeler–DeWitt equation. It is thus intimately connected to one of the central interpretative puzzles of the canonical approach to quantum gravity, namely, how to make sense of a profoundly timeless quantum formalism. This talk reviews several disparate challenges to the technical underpinning of the orthodox view that are starting to gain prominence. Three issues, in particular, will be surveyed. One, explored in the work of Salisbury and collaborators and Pitts, concerns the true relationship between transformations identified as gauge symmetries in the context of a Lagrangian formalism and transformations generated by first-class constraints. A second, explored in the work of Barbour, Gryb and Thébault, concerns whether physical magnitudes are required to commute with all first-class constraints in order for a Hamiltonian theory to be manifestly deterministic. Taking on board the lessons from these two areas is not always sufficient to address all apparent indeterminism in the Hamiltonian formalism. The third topic concerns how this should be addressed.

Physik - Open Access LMU - Teil 02/02
Complete electroweak chiral Lagrangian with a light Higgs at NLO

Physik - Open Access LMU - Teil 02/02

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 1, 2014


We consider the Standard Model, including a light scalar boson h, as an effective theory at the weak scale v = 246 GeV of some unknown dynamics of electroweak symmetry breaking. This dynamics may be strong, with h emerging as a pseudo-Goldstone boson. The symmetry breaking scale Λ is taken to be at 4 π v or above. We review the leading-order Lagrangian within this framework, which is nonrenormalizable in general. A chiral Lagrangian can then be constructed based on a loop expansion. A systematic power counting is derived and used to identify the classes of counterterms that appear at one loop order. With this result the complete Lagrangian is constructed at next-to-leading order, O ( v 2 / Λ 2 ) . This Lagrangian is the most general effective description of the Standard Model containing a light scalar boson, in general with strong dynamics of electroweak symmetry breaking. Scenarios such as the {SILH} ansatz or the dimension-6 Lagrangian of a linearly realized Higgs sector can be recovered as special cases.

Physik - Open Access LMU - Teil 02/02
Nonstandard Higgs couplings from angular distributions in h→Zℓ+ℓ−

Physik - Open Access LMU - Teil 02/02

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 1, 2014


We compute the fully differential rate for the Higgs-boson decay h→Zℓ+ℓ− , with Z→ℓ′+ℓ′− . For these processes we assume the most general matrix elements within an effective Lagrangian framework. The electroweak chiral Lagrangian we employ assumes minimal particle content and Standard Model gauge symmetries, but it is otherwise completely general. We discuss how information on new physics in the decay form factors may be obtained that is inaccessible in the dilepton-mass spectrum integrated over angular variables. The form factors are related to the coefficients of the effective Lagrangian, which are used to estimate the potential size of new-physics effects.

Physik - Open Access LMU - Teil 02/02
On the power counting in effective field theories

Physik - Open Access LMU - Teil 02/02

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 1, 2014


We discuss the systematics of power counting in general effective field theories, focusing on those that are nonrenormalizable at leading order. As an illuminating example we consider chiral perturbation theory gauged under the electromagnetic U(1) symmetry. This theory describes the low-energy interactions of the octet of pseudo-Goldstone bosons in QCD with photons and has been discussed extensively in the literature. Peculiarities of the standard approach are pointed out and it is shown how these are resolved within our scheme. The presentation follows closely our recent discussion of power counting for the electroweak chiral Lagrangian. The systematics of the latter is reviewed and shown to be consistent with the concept of chiral dimensions. The results imply that naive dimensional analysis (NDA) is incomplete in general effective field theories, while still reproducing the correct counting in special cases.

Physik - Open Access LMU - Teil 02/02
Geometry and the quantum: basics

Physik - Open Access LMU - Teil 02/02

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 1, 2014


Motivated by the construction of spectral manifolds in noncommutative geometry, we introduce a higher degree Heisenberg commutation relation involving the Dirac operator and the Feynman slash of scalar fields. This commutation relation appears in two versions, one sided and two sided. It implies the quantization of the volume. In the one-sided case it implies that the manifold decomposes into a disconnected sum of spheres which will represent quanta of geometry. The two sided version in dimension 4 predicts the two algebras M 2(ℍ) and M 4(ℂ) which are the algebraic constituents of the Standard Model of particle physics. This taken together with the non-commutative algebra of functions allows one to reconstruct, using the spectral action, the Lagrangian of gravity coupled with the Standard Model. We show that any connected Riemannian Spin 4-manifold with quantized volume > 4 (in suitable units) appears as an irreducible representation of the two-sided commutation relations in dimension 4 and that these representations give a seductive model of the “particle picture” for a theory of quantum gravity in which both the Einstein geometric standpoint and the Standard Model emerge from Quantum Mechanics. Physical applications of this quantization scheme will follow in a separate publication.

Mathematics for the Fluid Earth
Renormalized relaxed Lagrangian solutions for SG in physical space

Mathematics for the Fluid Earth

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 10, 2013 54:07


Tudorascu, A (West Virginia University) Thursday 05 December 2013, 11:30-12:15

Mathematics for the Fluid Earth
Lagrangian solutions for semigeostrophic system in physical space

Mathematics for the Fluid Earth

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 9, 2013 57:58


Feldman, M (University of Wisconsin-Madison) Thursday 05 December 2013, 10:15-11:00

MCMP – Philosophy of Physics
Real Change Happens in Hamiltonian General Relativity; Just Ask the Lagrangian (about Time-like Killing Vectors, First-Class Constraints and Observables)

MCMP – Philosophy of Physics

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 9, 2013 37:32


J. Brian Pitts (Cambridge) gives a talk at the MCMP workshop "Quantum Gravity in Perspective" (31 May-1 June, 2013) titled "Real Change Happens in Hamiltonian General Relativity; Just Ask the Lagrangian (about Time-like Killing Vectors, First-Class Constraints and Observables)". Abstract: In Hamiltonian GR, change has seemed absent. Attention to the gauge generator G facilitates a neglected calculation: a first-class constraint generates a bad physical change in electromagnetism and GR, spoiling the constraints, Gauss's law or the momentum and Hamiltonian constraints in the (physically relevant) velocities. Only as a team G do first-calss constraints generate a gauge transformation. To find change, insist on Hamiltonian-Lagrangian equivalence. Change is ineliminable time dependence; in vaccum GR it is the absence of a time-like Killing vector field. Neglecting spatial dependence, invariantly something depends on time via Hamilton's equations iff there is no time-like Killing vector. According to Bergmann, reality is not confined to observables, defined as both gauge invariant (hence real) and economical (Cauchy data on space). Thus change can exist outside observables. Bergmanns lemma that observables have vanishing Poisson brackets for gauge transformations was imported by analogy to electromagnetism, neglecting the external vs. internal distinction and Hamiltonaian-Lagrangian equivalence. The resulting implausible Killing-type condition lacks the local examples required by Bergmann. Taking observables to be geometric objects (tensors, etc.) as usual in the 4-dimensional Lagrangian formalism makes the Poisson bracket of G with an observable the Lie derivative of a geometric object (on-shell): covariance, not invariance.

Effective Field Theory
Lecture 6: Chiral Lagrangians

Effective Field Theory

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 27, 2013 79:06


In this lecture, the professor discussed linear sigma model & field redefinitions, non-linear Lagrangian & symmetry breaking, Spurion analysis, and started topic of loops.

Grothendieck-Teichmüller Groups, Deformation and Operads
Classical and quantum Lagrangian field theories on manifolds with boundaries

Grothendieck-Teichmüller Groups, Deformation and Operads

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 8, 2013 60:00


Cattaneo, A (Universität Zürich) Wednesday 03 April 2013, 09:30-10:30

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 04/05

The introduction of a so-called dark sector in cosmology resolved many inconsistencies between cosmological theory and observation, but it also triggered many new questions. Dark Matter (DM) explained gravitational effects beyond what is accounted for by observed luminous matter and Dark Energy (DE) accounted for the observed accelerated expansion of the universe. The most sought after discoveries in the field would give insight into the nature of these dark components. Dark Matter is considered to be the better established of the two, but the understanding of its nature may still lay far in the future. This thesis is concerned with explaining and eliminating the discrepancies between the current theoretical model, the standard model of cosmology, containing the cosmological constant Λ as the driver of accelerated expansion and Cold Dark Matter (CDM) as main source of gravitational effects, and available observational evidence pertaining to the dark sector. In particular, we focus on the small, galaxy-sized scales and below, where N-body simulations of cosmological structure in the ΛCDM universe predict much more structure and therefore much more power in the matter power spectrum than what is found by a range of different observations. This discrepancy in small scale power manifests itself for example through the well known "dwarf-galaxy problem'" (e.g. Klypin, 1999), the density profiles and concentrations of individual haloes (Donato, 2009) as well as the properties of voids (Tikhonov, 2009). A physical process that would suppress the fluctuations in the dark matter density field might be able to account for these discrepancies. Free-streaming dark matter particles dampen the overdensities on small scales of the initial linear matter density field. This corresponds to a suppression of power in the linear matter power spectrum and can be modeled relatively straightforwardly for an early decoupled thermal relic dark matter particle. Such a particle would be neutrino-like, but heavier; an example being the gravitino in the scenario, where it is the Lightest Supersymmetric Particle and it decouples much before neutrinos, but while still relativistic. Such a particle is not classified as Hot Dark Matter, like neutrinos, because it only affects small scales as opposed to causing a suppression at all scales. However, its free-streaming prevents the smallest structures from gravitationally collapsing and does therefore not correspond to Cold Dark Matter. The effect of this Warm Dark Matter (WDM) may be observable in the statistical properties of cosmological Large Scale Structure. The suppression of the linear matter density field at high redshifts in the WDM scenario can be calculated by solving the Boltzmann equations. A fit to the resulting linear matter power spectrum, which describes the statistical properties of this density field in the simple thermal relic scenario is provided by Viel (2004). This linear matter power spectrum must then be corrected for late-time non-linear collapse. This is rather difficult already in the standard cosmological scenario, because exact solutions the the evolution of the perturbed density field in the nonlinear regime cannot be found. The widely used approaches are to the 'halofit' method of Smith (2002), which is essentially a physically motivated fit to the results of numerical simulations or using the even more physical, but slightly less accurate halo model. However, both of these non-linear methods were developed assuming only CDM and are therefore not necessarily appropriate for the WDM case. In this thesis, we modify the halo model (see also Smith, 2011) in order to better accommodate the effects of the smoothed WDM density field. Firstly, we treat the dark matter density field as made up of two components: a smooth, linear component and a non-linear component, both with power at all scales. Secondly, we introduce a cut-off mass scale, below which no haloes are found. Thirdly, we suppress the mass function also above the cut-off scale and finally, we suppress the centres of halo density profiles by convolving them with a Gaussian function, whose width depends on the WDM relic thermal velocity. The latter effect is shown to not be significant in the WDM scenario for the calculation of the non-linear matter power spectrum at the scales relevant to the present and near future capabilities of astronomical surveys in particular the Euclid weak lensing survey. In order to determine the validity of the different non-linear WDM models, we run cosmological simulations with WDM (see also Viel, 2012) using the cutting edge Lagrangian code Gadget-2 (Springel, 2005). We provide a fitting function that can be easily applied to approximate the non-linear WDM power spectrum at redshifts z = 0.5 - 3.0 at a range of scales relevant to the weak lensing power spectrum. We examine the simple thermal relic scenario for different WDM masses and check our results against resolution issues by varying the size and number of simulation particles. We finally briefly discuss the possibility that the effects of WDM on the matter power spectrum might resemble the analogous, but weaker and larger scale effects of the free-streaming of massive neutrinos. We consider this with the goal of re-examining the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data (as in Thomas, 2010). We find that the effects of the neutrinos might just differ enough from the effects of WDM to prevent the degeneracy of the relevant parameters, namely the sum of neutrino masses and the mass of the WDM particle.

Modern Physics: Special Relativity (Spring 2012)
9. Special Relativity Lecture 9 (June 12, 2012)

Modern Physics: Special Relativity (Spring 2012)

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 22, 2012 99:51


Leonard Susskind discusses plane electromagnetic waves in regards to Maxwell's equations. He then looks for Lagrangian formulations of Maxwell's equations in order to support the laws of conservation. (June 11, 2012)

Traffic Flow Theory and Simulation
Traffic Flow Theory and Simulation: 6. Influence of trucks, lagrangian coordinates and MFD

Traffic Flow Theory and Simulation

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 5, 2012 98:27


Mathematics and Applications of Branes in String and M-theory
Lagrangian cycles and knots at large N

Mathematics and Applications of Branes in String and M-theory

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 16, 2012 53:12


Diaconescu, E (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey) Thursday 12 January 2012, 15:30-16:30

11. Interplanetary Bodies
Trojan Asteroids

11. Interplanetary Bodies

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 21, 2011 0:45


Transcript: Trojan asteroids are a subgroup located outside the region of the main belt. There are two swarms in the orbit of Jupiter located sixty degrees ahead and sixty degrees behind the planet as it orbits the Sun. These particular positions are called Lagrangian points, places where the asteroids are held by a combination of the gravity force of the Sun and Jupiter. A hundred or more are known. Most are 50 kilometers or larger in size. They’re all named after Homer’s epic poem about the Trojan War. The largest is 624 Hector which is 100 by 300 kilometers in size.

Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 01/02
Hamiltonian unknottedness of certain monotone Lagrangian tori in S2xS2

Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 01/02

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 16, 2010


Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:00:00 +0100 https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12396/ https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12396/1/Schwingenheuer_Martin.pdf Schwingenheuer, Martin ddc:500, ddc:510, Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Statist

Gyrokinetics in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas
Lagrangian formulation of gyrokinetic theory with a single expansion parameter

Gyrokinetics in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 12, 2010 59:19


Calvo, I (CIEMAT) Tuesday 10 August 2010, 14:00-14:40

Gyrokinetics in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas
Lagrangian chaos and the evolution of advected fields

Gyrokinetics in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 11, 2010 66:32


Antonsen, T (Maryland) Wednesday 04 August 2010, 10:00-11:00

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 03/05
Resolution of Curvature Singularities in Black Holes and the Early Universe

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 03/05

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 23, 2010


This thesis is concerned with two approaches on the singularity problem of the general theory of relativity. The first is of bottom-up nature. We start from Einstein's well established general relativity and make an educated guess for an asymptotically equivalent but non-singular theory. In the second approach we take the top-down perspective starting with the assumption that string theory gives the fundamental description of nature and analyse the resulting low energy effective theory. Our bottom-up approach is an application of the limiting curvature hypothesis to anisotropic cosmologies. This extends the success for isotropic cosmologies of Brandenberger et al. Applying the LCH, they constructed a theory in which all homogeneous and isotropic solutions are singularity free. Due to the non-analytic nature of the equations we were unable repeat the proof in the anisotropic case, but analytical and numerical analysis produce circumstantial evidence for a resolution of the singularity in this case as well. Generically this resolution seems not to involve a de Sitter phase as expected. Instead it would interpolate between a contracting anisotropic universe and a universe, that time-symmetrically expands anisotropically. During this transition spacetime evolves through a nearly flat, Minkowski phase. This solution could represent an alternative to the so-called bounce solutions as they appear in pre-big-bang scenarios. In our top-down approach we construct a simple model in type IIA super string theory. With a non-BPS D7 or D9 brane we introduce a tachyonic degree of freedom. Its potential is influenced by the compact background wrapped by the brane. In a way the mass can be tuned by the size of the compact dimension. We use a truncated action which was constructed in order to approximate the full string theory result for the dynamical creation and decay of non-BPS branes quite accurately. Taking the lowest order effective action for metric, dilaton and an effective action for the open tachyonic mode, we obtaine bounce solutions. The bounce results from the positivity of the pressure of the tachyon field in our Lagrangian. Both curvature and time derivative of the dilaton remain small during our bounce so that the gravitational sector behaves entirely classical. Asymptotically our bounce solutions are similar to pre-big bang and post-big bang solutions respectively. Thus there remain singularities in the curvature and the dilaton before or after the bounce. These asymptotic string frame curvature singularities can be resolved by the ad hoc addition of a potential term, that might result from alpha' corrections in the open string sector. Exact calculation of the corrections would be necessary in order to give a more precise picture.

Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 01/02

On classical Lie groups, which act by means of a unitary representation on finite dimensional Hilbert spaces H, we identify two classes of tensor field constructions. First, as pull-back tensor fields of order two from modified Hermitian tensor fields, constructed on Hilbert spaces by means of the property of having the vertical distributions of the C_0-principal bundle H_0 over the projective Hilbert space P(H) in the kernel. And second, directly constructed on the Lie group, as left-invariant representation-dependent operator-valued tensor fields (LIROVTs) of arbitrary order being evaluated on a quantum state. Within the NP-hard problem of deciding whether a given state in a n-level bi-partite quantum system is entangled or separable (Gurvits, 2003), we show that both tensor field constructions admit a geometric approach to this problem, which evades the traditional ambiguity on defining metrical structures on the convex set of mixed states. In particular by considering manifolds associated to orbits passing through a selected state when acted upon by the local unitary group U(n)xU(n) of Schmidt coefficient decomposition inducing transformations, we find the following results: In the case of pure states we show that Schmidt-equivalence classes which are Lagrangian submanifolds define maximal entangled states. This implies a stronger statement as the one proposed by Bengtsson (2007). Moreover, Riemannian pull-back tensor fields split on orbits of separable states and provide a quantitative characterization of entanglement which recover the entanglement measure proposed by Schlienz and Mahler (1995). In the case of mixed states we highlight a relation between LIROVTs of order two and a class of computable separability criteria based on the Bloch-representation (de Vicente, 2007).

Physics Colloquium Series
Atoms in Motion: The Remarkable Connections Between Atomic and Hadronic Physics

Physics Colloquium Series

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 11, 2010 91:59


Abstract: Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), the fundamental theory underlying atomic physics, shares the same Lagrangian as Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), the theory underlying hadronic and nuclear physics. Insights from both theories enrich each other. For example, the light-front methods which underly phenomenology in high energy physics also have remarkable advantages for describing the wavefunctions of atoms in motion. The conversion of muonic atoms to electronic atoms provides a direct analog for the weak decay of hadrons such as the B meson. "True muonium", theatomic bound state of a muon and antimuon, is the QED analog of heavy quarkonium in QCD. Electron-positron pair production at high field strength in QED has features in common with the confinement dynamics of QCD. I will also discuss how the production of relativistic antihydrogen has provided important insight into the hadronization of quarks and gluons of QCD at the amplitude level. Dr. Brodsky is a Professor at SLAC (Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource) in the Theoretical Physics Group.Presented Feb. 26, 2010.

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 03/05
Real Mirror Symmetry and The Real Topological String

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 03/05

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 2, 2009


This thesis is concerned with real mirror symmetry, that is, mirror symmetry for a Calabi-Yau 3-fold background with a D-brane on a special Lagrangian 3-cycle defined by the real locus of an anti-holomorphic involution. More specifically, we will study real mirror symmetry by means of compact 1-parameter Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in weighted projective space (at tree-level) and non-compact local P2 (at higher genus). For the compact models, we identify mirror pairs of D-brane configurations in weighted projective space, derive the corresponding inhomogeneous Picard-Fuchs equations, and solve for the domainwall tensions as analytic functions over moduli space, thereby collecting evidence for real mirror symmetry at tree-level. A major outcome of this part is the prediction of the number of disk instantons ending on the D-brane for these models. Further, we study real mirror symmetry at higher genus using local P2. For that, we utilize the real topological string, that is, the topological string on a background with O-plane and D-brane on top. In detail, we calculate topological amplitudes using three complementary techniques. In the A-model, we refine localization on the moduli space of maps with respect to the torus action preserved by the anti-holomorphic involution. This leads to a computation of open and unoriented Gromov-Witten invariants that can be applied to any toric Calabi-Yau with involution. We then show that the full topological string amplitudes can be reproduced within the topological vertex formalism. Especially, we obtain the real topological vertex with trivial fixed leg. Finally, we verify that the same results arise in the B-model from the extended holomorphic anomaly equations, together with appropriate boundary conditions, thereby establishing local real mirror symmetry at higher genus. Significant outcomes of this part are the derivation of real Gopakumar-Vafa invariants at high Euler number and degree for local P2 and the discovery of a new kind of gap structure of the closed and unoriented topological amplitudes at the conifold point in moduli space.

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 02/05
Black hole attractors and the entropy function in four- and five-dimensional N=2 supergravity

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 02/05

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 20, 2007


Extremal black holes in theories of gravity coupled to abelian gauge fields and neutral scalars, such as those arising in the low-energy description of compactifications of string theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds, exhibit the attractor phenomenon: on the event horizon the scalars settle to values determined by the charges carried by the black hole and independent of the values at infinity. It is so, because on the horizon the energy contained in vector fields acts as an effective potential (the black hole potential), driving the scalars towards its minima. For spherically symmetric black holes in theories where gauge potentials appear in the Lagrangian solely through field strengths, the attractor phenomenon can be alternatively described by a variational principle based on the so-called entropy function, defined as the Legendre transform with respect to electric fields of the Lagrangian density integrated over the horizon. Stationarity conditions for the entropy function then take the form of attractor equations relating the horizon values of the scalars to the black hole charges, while the stationary value itself yields the entropy of the black hole. In this study we examine the relationship between the entropy function and the black hole potential in four-dimensional N=2 supergravity and demonstrate that in the absence of higher-order corrections to the Lagrangian these two notions are equivalent. We also exemplify their practical application by finding a supersymmetric and a non-supersymmetric solution to the attractor equations for a conifold prepotential. Exploiting a connection between four- and five-dimensional black holes we then extend the definition of the entropy function to a class of rotating black holes in five-dimensional N=2 supergravity with cubic prepotentials, to which the original formulation did not apply because of broken spherical symmetry and explicit dependence of the Lagrangian on the gauge potentials in the Chern-Simons term. We also display two types of solutions to the respective attractor equations. The link between four- and five-dimensional black holes allows us further to derive five-dimensional first-order differential flow equations governing the profile of the fields from infinity to the horizon and construct non-supersymmetric solutions in four dimensions by dimensional reduction. Finally, four-dimensional extremal black holes in N=2 supergravity can be also viewed as certain two-dimensional string compactifications with fluxes. Motivated by this fact the recently proposed entropic principle postulates as a probability measure on the space of these string compactifications the exponentiated entropy of the corresponding black holes. Invoking the conifold example we find that the entropic principle would favor compactifications that result in infrared-free gauge theories.

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 01/05
Erweiterung der `Localized Near Field' Theorie zur Bestimmung von Quellstärken bei beliebiger thermischer Schichtung in einem Waldbestand

Fakultät für Physik - Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU - Teil 01/05

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 28, 2003


The energy and mass budget of the atmosphere is mainly determined by the exchange at the earths surface. Here plant canopies play a major role. The 'Localized Near Field Theorie' (LNF) of Raupach (1989) describes the relation between concentration profiles and source/sink profiles inside the plant canopy. This work describes a general method based on the LNF to calculate source distributions from measured concentration profiles inside a plant canopy. The LNF is used for the first time to examine the effects of the so called roughness sublayer. To apply the LNF during arbitrary thermal stratification it is necessary to find parametrisations for the input parameters standard deviation of vertical velocity and Lagrangian integral time scale. These are derived from values measured inside a pine forest. Using these parametrisations the distribution of heat sources inside the forest canopy is calculated from measured temperature profiles.