Podcasts about Analogy

Ken tries to justify why he's rooting for the Guardians "in a vacuum" this year, separate from the frustration surrounding the Browns and Cavs, and workshops a series of college football comparisons—first Purdue, then Minnesota, then Arkansas—to capture a scrappy, low-budget team overperforming against big spenders like the Dodgers. Lima and the rest of the room shoot down every comparison as a stretch, with Ken eventually conceding he's just trying to find a way to be excited about a low-payroll team making the playoffs without sounding like he's making excuses for ownership. The segment closes with a quick preview of Sunday's Browns game and reminders about the AFC North catch-up and Ralphy Velasquez chatter from earlier in the show.

Are you consuming endless podcasts, books, and sermons but finding your life stuck in the exact same spot? In this episode of Friday Field Notes, Ryan Michler breaks down the critical difference between being a roaring river and a stagnant swamp.  Most men don't have an information problem—they have a direction problem. Unapplied knowledge turns into a shallow, rotting pond that breeds resentment, irritability, and inaction. Discover how to establish rigid boundaries ("banks") in your life, implement the 48-Hour Rule for immediate execution, cap your inputs, and surround yourself with real accountability so your knowledge actually flows into meaningful strength. SHOW HIGHLIGHTS 00:00 The Analogy of Two Waters 01:30 Why a River Needs Banks to Have Power 02:26 You Don't Have an Information Problem 04:55 What Boundaries and Banks Actually Do 06:05 The Danger of Stagnant Knowledge 08:00 How Unused Insight Rotates into Resentment 09:45 Action Rule 1: The 48-Hour Rule 11:30 Action Rule 2: Single-Point Accountability 12:50 Action Rule 3: Cap Inputs, Raise Outputs 16:00 Feeding Everything Downstream   Battle Planners: Pick yours up today! Order Ryan's new book, The Masculinity Manifesto. For more information on the Iron Council brotherhood. Want maximum health, wealth, relationships, and abundance in your life? Sign up for our free course, 30 Days to Battle Ready  

Ken Carman replays Daryl Ruiter's blunt "garbage" quarterback take and defends why the show keeps hammering the position, comparing the Browns' roster to a house with a beautifully renovated living room but a kitchen on fire — no matter how good the other rooms look, that's the room everyone notices. Ken admits he's still holding out hope for a surprise winning season even as he talks himself back down to reality, and stresses the QB situation can't get fixed until at least next offseason's draft capital comes into play

Today's slightly bizarre pizza analogy is designed to help you honour you needs and seasons, and remind you that you're doing okay!

The Drive dropped an incredible analogy about the Chiefs secondary, which fans really believe in heading into the 2026 season.

“Aquinas on Simplicity and Analogy: A Problem in Natural Theology” by Rev. David Paternostro, S.J. (Creighton University). Presented at Thomas Aquinas College's 2026 Thomistic Summer Conference.

I like analogies, they help us understand things. The one I use today might not be the most accurate, bit it gets the point across. (I hope)Learning to live the way our Creator designed us to live — Links, give God 90 https://www.givegod90.com/ Author Jerry Mitchell is where the books are available https://www.authorjerrymitchell.com/ #HowToLiveTheWayWeAreDesignedToLive #LanguageCultureHistory#GiveGod90#AuthorJerryMitchell#TraditionToTruth#GodsUniverseGods Rules#InheritingLies

Camas resident Anthony Teso responds to a prior letter, arguing that applying automobile-style regulation to firearms would make Washington's gun laws stricter, not looser. He also corrects the record on Senate Bill 5098, the Bite of Seattle shooting, and Vancouver's public defender shortage. https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-take-the-car-analogy-seriously/ #Opinion #GunLaws #WashingtonState #ClarkCounty #SB5098 #PublicDefense #Vancouver #Camas #Firearms #LetterToTheEditor

“The Smoak Show” on 365 Sports-YouTube Friday, July 31st:***MILLIONPODCASTS.COM*** (2-Graphics)*Top 10 Most Impactful Non-QB's in CFB (Graphic)*Curt Cignetti on Wife Bossing Him Around (Big Ten Network)*Curt Cignetti Has Broken the SEC (SEC Unfiltered-Video)*What Was the Question Curt Cignetti Was Actually Answering (Lawrence W Holmes)*Kyle Whittingham on Rivalry with Ohio State (Matt Fortuna-Video)*Kyle Whittingham on Week of Michigan vs. Ohio State (UM JU-Video)*Ralph Russo's Analogy to Protect College Sports Act (Ralph Russo 1 & 2)*Michael Lombardi's UNC Tenure w/Arrogance and Ignorance (John Talty)*Former BYU Star Taysom Hill Retires from NFL (Taysom Hill)*ESPN's Molly McGrath Switching from CFB to NFL Sidelines (Sports Rapport)00:40:00-John Talty, CBS Sports01:00:00-Joshua Perry, NBC Sports02:25:00-Super Chats/Wheel/Quizzes/Polls*Rez, Garrett, Andrew, Logan, Huston, Cheyenne Producing *Please Hit Like and/or Subscribe Buttons*365 Sports Tonight at 10:30 on Local CW (Tease Next Day Programming)See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

We reflect back on the big newsmakers that grabbed our attention over this past week for all the right and unfortunately, the wrong reasons...

We reflect back on the big newsmakers that grabbed our attention over this past week for all the right and unfortunately, the wrong reasons... See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this audio of the Sermon, you will watch Jude add the finishing touches to his portrait of the apostates (false teachers).  He will paint 5 quick defining strokes in the form of 5 metaphors and will end with a final touches of an examination of their fruit.  It is a message for every saint & sinner.

Seth takes a closer look at Trump lashing out at Canada for no apparent reason but giving China a pass after he claimed they meddled in the 2020 election while he was president.Then, Tracee Ellis Ross talks about making her Broadway debut in the play Every Brilliant Thing, casting audience members to participate in the show before each performance and traveling to multiple countries for her Solo Traveling series.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Covino & Rich laugh at Rich's "wonderful" Target story! Not quite ready for NFL season ? 'MID WEAK MAJOR' gets extra time on the clock, & the Heat leak on YouTube! Plus, John Harbaugh is cringey.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Take a look at Joni's newest book: "Keeping Faith When Life Hurts." Order it here. --------Thank you for listening! Your support of Joni and Friends helps make this show possible. Joni and Friends envisions a world where every person with a disability finds hope, dignity, and their place in the body of Christ. Become part of the global movement today at www.joniandfriends.org. Find more encouragement on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube.

On this episode of Chit Chat Stocks, Brett and Ryan dive into the semiconductor industry to give an introductory overview of the sector, including multiple stock case studies. We discuss: (00:00) Introduction (04:04) What Is a Semiconductor? Basic Explanation and Analogy (15:11) History (19:54) Industry Cycles, Leading Companies, and Market Dynamics (30:09) Case Study: ASML and EUV Lithography Machines (38:03) Case Study: Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) and Advanced Nodes (53:00) Cadence Design Systems and Semiconductor Software (01:08:13) Listener Questions ***************************************************** Subscribe to our newsletter, Emerging Moats: emergingmoats.com  ********************************************************************* Chit Chat Stocks is presented by Interactive Brokers. Get professional pricing, global access, and premier technology with the best brokerage for investors today:  https://www.interactivebrokers.com/  Interactive Brokers is a member of SIPC.  ********************************************************************* Fiscal.ai is building the future of financial data. With custom charts, AI-generated research reports, and endless analytical tools, you can get up to speed on any stock around the globe. All for a reasonable price.  Use our LINK and get 15% off any premium plan: ⁠https://fiscal.ai/chitchat  ********************************************************************* Disclosure: Chit Chat Stocks hosts and guests are not financial advisors, and nothing they say on this show is formal advice or a recommendation. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, Jason explores why buffers are critical on construction projects and how proper before-phase planning sets the stage for smooth execution. Using a humorous analogy of navigating an In-N-Out drive-thru, he explains how insufficient buffers not only disrupt workflow but also put workers under unnecessary stress. What you'll learn in this episode: The difference between waiting you pay for versus waiting you don't. Why buffers are essential for both workflow and worker safety. How before-phase planning prevents delays and maximizes flow. Key pre-planning activities to execute a phase successfully. How small adjustments upstream save massive time downstream. Are you fully leveraging before-phase planning to keep your projects flowing without unnecessary stops? If you like the Elevate Construction podcast, please subscribe for free and you'll never miss an episode.  And if you really like the Elevate Construction podcast, I'd appreciate you telling a friend (Maybe even two

Looking for daily inspiration?  Get a quote from the top leaders in the industry in your inbox every morning.   Jake McCoy is the Interim CEO of RWS Global. With a background in technical theater production and more than 15 years of experience across live entertainment, production, operations, and business strategy, Jake has helped shape RWS into a global leader in live moments across cruise lines, theme parks, sports, and destination experiences. After meeting RWS founder Ryan Stana backstage during Mariah Carey's first “All I Want for Christmas Is You” production at the Beacon Theatre, Jake joined the company and has since worked across nearly every department within the organization. In this interview, Jake talks about human-led experiences, a single source of truth, and the Ferrari analogy. Human-Led Experiences “At the end of the day, for me, this is really what it is all about is we create human-led experiences powered by exceptional human talent.” Jake emphasized that while technology and AI continue to reshape the entertainment landscape, RWS differentiates itself through people. He explained that the company's success comes from blending creative excellence with operational excellence while relying on world-class talent to bring experiences to life. Rather than simply producing entertainment, RWS focuses on creating emotional human connections through storytelling and immersive engagement. He shared that audiences today no longer want entertainment to simply “happen at them.” Instead, guests want to actively participate in experiences. Jake highlighted immersive cruise ship lounges, secret speakeasy experiences, and branded activations as examples of how RWS creates environments where guests become part of the story. He also reflected on the emotional impact of character meet-and-greets, explaining that even seemingly small interactions can become lifelong memories for families and children. Single Source Of Truth “I think one foundational principle, it doesn't matter how big you are, it doesn't matter if you're a five-person team or a 500-person team, is single source of truth.” As RWS expanded globally through acquisitions, Jake explained that communication and operational alignment became one of the company's biggest challenges. He described how different offices initially operated on disconnected systems, making collaboration inefficient and inconsistent. To solve this, RWS implemented a unified operational infrastructure where all teams use the same communication tools, HR systems, project management platforms, and content repositories. Jake explained that a single source of truth is about much more than software. It creates clarity, accountability, and consistency across an organization. Whether someone works in New York, Shanghai, London, or Riyadh, every team member knows exactly where to find the most accurate information and how to communicate effectively. He stressed that scalable businesses require stable systems, consistent rhythms, and clearly defined communication channels that allow people to focus on delivering experiences instead of searching for the correct version of a document. The Ferrari Analogy “RWS Global looks like a Ferrari on the outside. My job is to make sure that it is built like a Ferrari on the inside.” Jake used this analogy to explain his operational philosophy as COO and now Interim CEO. While many companies focus only on what guests see externally, he believes long-term success depends on building strong systems, infrastructure, and operational discipline beneath the surface. That includes scalable processes, integrated global teams, intentional communication strategies, and carefully aligned acquisitions. He explained that sustainable growth requires more than rapid expansion. Organizations must build a reliable internal engine capable of supporting future scale without sacrificing quality or culture. Jake shared that RWS learned early on that acquisitions do not naturally integrate themselves. Success requires clear communication, cultural understanding, unified systems, and leadership that intentionally creates one cohesive team. By building a strong operational foundation, RWS has positioned itself to continue growing across entertainment and sports markets around the world.   Jake can be reached on LinkedIn, as well as through the official RWS Global Instagram account at @rwsglobalofficial. To learn more about RWS Global, visit www.rwsglobal.com. This podcast wouldn't be possible without the incredible work of our faaaaaantastic team: Scheduling and correspondence by Kristen Karaliunas   To connect with AttractionPros: AttractionPros.com AttractionPros@gmail.com AttractionPros on Facebook AttractionPros on LinkedIn AttractionPros on Instagram AttractionPros on Twitter (X)

Send us Fan MailLearn how Amazon PPC relevancy impacts ad placement, CPC, and keyword performance. In this video, we break down why big brands like KitchenAid can often pay less for Amazon ads while newer sellers may need higher bids to compete on broad keywords like “kitchen scissors.” This overview explains how Amazon uses sales velocity, click-through rate, conversion history, reviews, and organic ranking signals to decide which products are most relevant for search terms.Get help from My Amazon Guy to grow your Amazon sales: https://bit.ly/4jMZtxu#AmazonPPC #AmazonAds #AmazonFBA #EcommerceStrategy #AmazonSellerWant free resources? Dowload our Free Amazon guides here:Amazon Receiving Delay Guide: https://hubs.ly/Q04cdD4c0Amazon Catalog Spring Cleaning: https://hubs.ly/Q046BVfp0Amazon Proft Margin Defense 2026: https://hubs.ly/Q042trRH0Amazon SEO Toolkit 2026: https://bit.ly/4oC2ClTAmazon Seller Strategy Report 2026: https://bit.ly/3YN1RME2026 Ecommerce Website & SEO Readiness Checklist: https://hubs.ly/Q04btghf0Amazon 2026 PPC guide: https://bit.ly/4lF0OYXTimestamps0:00 - The $7.59 Product vs. Your $3.92 Bid 0:20 - What is Amazon Relevancy? 0:42 - The "Deck of Cards" Analogy 1:32 - History: The 4 Pillars of Relevancy 2:10 - Why Big Brands Pay Less 2:47 - The Broad Match Trap for New Products 3:20 - How to Improve Your Relevancy Rank-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Follow us:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/28605816/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/stevenpopemag/Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/myamazonguys/Twitter: https://twitter.com/myamazonguySubscribe to the My Amazon Guy podcast: https://podcast.myamazonguy.comApple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/my-amazon-guy/id1501974229Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4A5ASHGGfr6s4wWNQIqyVwSupport the show

Send us Fan MailTo see the video go to: https://youtu.be/qeqxtk0jeNYOnline Magazine Link:  DriventobeFree.org    YouTube Channel: Freedom Classes YouTube Channel (subscribe)  Email us:  MiracleofDel@gmail.com

We revisited movies that leave emotional dents in the audience. We reflected on the particular impact of Bone Tomahawk, Memento, and No Country for Old Men, each of which demonstrates that filmmakers possess an alarming ability to rearrange our nervous systems using little more than editing, tension, and a refusal to provide comforting explanations. That discussion led naturally to sports culture, which in America occasionally transforms victory into an elaborate public works project involving overturned objects and insurance claims. We traded stories about celebrations that escalated into city-wide chaos, highlighting the peculiar civic tradition of expressing affection for a team by setting fire to things the team had never asked anyone to ignite. Along the way, we examined regional rivalries and the enduring belief that residents of other cities are fundamentally misguided people whose sports preferences reveal deep character flaws. The focus widened to the curious presence of protestors outside Christian rock concerts, a niche activity requiring both logistical commitment and a sophisticated understanding of where Christian rock concerts are being held. We considered how these groups operate and the strange optics of objecting to music performed by people who are, on paper, already in broad ideological agreement with them. We considered how analogies work and whether they can be trained the same way people train themselves to catch flying Frisbees or remember where they parked. Through improv exercises and whatever everyday objects happened to be nearby, we discovered that the human brain is apparently eager to connect unrelated things, which is both the foundation of creativity and the reason someone eventually compares municipal budgeting to a crockpot. We also explored the paradox of songwriting, where jokes sometimes become hits and carefully engineered masterpieces occasionally disappear without a trace. Creating under pressure requires a willingness to chase ideas that initially sound ridiculous, while popularity itself remains stubbornly indifferent to effort, expertise, or anyone's carefully developed five-year plan. The same unpredictability surfaced in conversations about celebrity opinions, social media bans, and the mysterious mechanics by which certain people become influential while others post into the digital equivalent of an abandoned mall food court. By the end, we had connected improv exercises, traumatic movie endings, championship riots, concert protestors, songwriting deadlines, curmudgeonly tendencies, and the fragile economics of internet fame.

We revisited movies that leave emotional dents in the audience. We reflected on the particular impact of Bone Tomahawk, Memento, and No Country for Old Men, each of which demonstrates that filmmakers possess an alarming ability to rearrange our nervous systems using little more than editing, tension, and a refusal to provide comforting explanations. That discussion led naturally to sports culture, which in America occasionally transforms victory into an elaborate public works project involving overturned objects and insurance claims. We traded stories about celebrations that escalated into city-wide chaos, highlighting the peculiar civic tradition of expressing affection for a team by setting fire to things the team had never asked anyone to ignite. Along the way, we examined regional rivalries and the enduring belief that residents of other cities are fundamentally misguided people whose sports preferences reveal deep character flaws. The focus widened to the curious presence of protestors outside Christian rock concerts, a niche activity requiring both logistical commitment and a sophisticated understanding of where Christian rock concerts are being held. We considered how these groups operate and the strange optics of objecting to music performed by people who are, on paper, already in broad ideological agreement with them. We considered how analogies work and whether they can be trained the same way people train themselves to catch flying Frisbees or remember where they parked. Through improv exercises and whatever everyday objects happened to be nearby, we discovered that the human brain is apparently eager to connect unrelated things, which is both the foundation of creativity and the reason someone eventually compares municipal budgeting to a crockpot. We also explored the paradox of songwriting, where jokes sometimes become hits and carefully engineered masterpieces occasionally disappear without a trace. Creating under pressure requires a willingness to chase ideas that initially sound ridiculous, while popularity itself remains stubbornly indifferent to effort, expertise, or anyone's carefully developed five-year plan. The same unpredictability surfaced in conversations about celebrity opinions, social media bans, and the mysterious mechanics by which certain people become influential while others post into the digital equivalent of an abandoned mall food court. By the end, we had connected improv exercises, traumatic movie endings, championship riots, concert protestors, songwriting deadlines, curmudgeonly tendencies, and the fragile economics of internet fame.

We revisited movies that leave emotional dents in the audience. We reflected on the particular impact of Bone Tomahawk, Memento, and No Country for Old Men, each of which demonstrates that filmmakers possess an alarming ability to rearrange our nervous systems using little more than editing, tension, and a refusal to provide comforting explanations. That discussion led naturally to sports culture, which in America occasionally transforms victory into an elaborate public works project involving overturned objects and insurance claims. We traded stories about celebrations that escalated into city-wide chaos, highlighting the peculiar civic tradition of expressing affection for a team by setting fire to things the team had never asked anyone to ignite. Along the way, we examined regional rivalries and the enduring belief that residents of other cities are fundamentally misguided people whose sports preferences reveal deep character flaws. The focus widened to the curious presence of protestors outside Christian rock concerts, a niche activity requiring both logistical commitment and a sophisticated understanding of where Christian rock concerts are being held. We considered how these groups operate and the strange optics of objecting to music performed by people who are, on paper, already in broad ideological agreement with them. We considered how analogies work and whether they can be trained the same way people train themselves to catch flying Frisbees or remember where they parked. Through improv exercises and whatever everyday objects happened to be nearby, we discovered that the human brain is apparently eager to connect unrelated things, which is both the foundation of creativity and the reason someone eventually compares municipal budgeting to a crockpot. We also explored the paradox of songwriting, where jokes sometimes become hits and carefully engineered masterpieces occasionally disappear without a trace. Creating under pressure requires a willingness to chase ideas that initially sound ridiculous, while popularity itself remains stubbornly indifferent to effort, expertise, or anyone's carefully developed five-year plan. The same unpredictability surfaced in conversations about celebrity opinions, social media bans, and the mysterious mechanics by which certain people become influential while others post into the digital equivalent of an abandoned mall food court. By the end, we had connected improv exercises, traumatic movie endings, championship riots, concert protestors, songwriting deadlines, curmudgeonly tendencies, and the fragile economics of internet fame.

Professor John Yoo critiques the "Thucydides Trap" analogy used by Xi Jinping to describe US-China tensions. He argues China resembles militaristic Sparta, while the US represents the democratic, commercial Athens. Yoo warns that China's declining population and stolen technology make it a declining power compared to the booming US. (3)SPARTA

Printing things Analogy to Media Content, Bambu's Breakout Year 

Traditions of men had taken precedence over God's Word. Jesus reinterpreted the meaning of kosher and cleanliness while calling out the hypocrisy of the religious leaders of His day.

Traditions of men had taken precedence over God's Word. Jesus reinterpreted the meaning of kosher and cleanliness while calling out the hypocrisy of the religious leaders of His day.

The Analogy of Hagar and Ishmael

Big Shot Bob is back and he's got thoughts on everything — Kevin Durant's mounting reputation problem, a boxing night gone sideways, and the fight stories you didn't know you needed to hear.   This week on Shoot Around, Rob Jenners, Brandon Harper, and NBA legend Robert Horry break down the Ronda Rousey vs. Gina Carano Netflix disaster (17 seconds, folks), revisit the Mayweather-Pacquiao letdown, and get into whether KD is officially more trouble than he's worth — Colin Cowherd's "boat analogy" sets off a whole debate. Then it's athletes who threw it all away (Latrell Sprewell and Dennis Rodman get called out), Peyton Manning's diabolical trash talk strategy, and some genuinely unhinged public fight stories to close things out.   Plus: Horry on the worst smells he's ever encountered, Edwin Diaz and the cockfighting controversy, and Robert Horry quietly admitting he jumped on someone's bad knee and then stepped aside while they ran into a backboard. Just another week.  

This is Part 11 in a series celebrating the 40th Anniversary of Harvard University Press' 1985 publication of Richard A. Epstein's "Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain." We continue our celebration of this anniversary with a fair use and transformative reading, taking a close look at ch. 6 continuing in the same section which Richard calls ""Takings Prima Facia," which makes the analogy between riparian rights and land rights. He titles chapter 6, "Possession and Use," because he's taking a look at the natural law of the natural coherent unity of the very nature of incidents of ownership (possession, use, disposition/abuse) and the American constitutional order, how these things interact and hang together, ensconced as it is in the purpose of the Constitution. That moral purpose is the protection of individual liberty against claims by a simple majority in a democracy, or judicial or executive fiat, or by the government in any other way in a taking of private property. It's also a good reflection on nature of property per se, whether public or private. For governments are owners as well as takers of property. Today we discuss the entirety of his chapter 6 from pp. 63 to 73.. At the end, this episode concludes with a reading of Psalm 60 in the KJV and January 30th in Streams in the Desert (Cowman Publications, Lost Feliz Station Lost Angeles, Calif. 1925 original non-woke edition). Excellent stuff here. Excellent. Every college student should read this book. It's a superb introduction to the political philosophy of the American regime. Praise the Lord. We'd like to thank Harvard University Press for making this material available and Richard Epstein for writing it. Make sure you buy the book and follow along. It's very important for you to have your own copy on your own bookshelf, and to begin to master this material. Support your local book dealer. See if they have a copy of it, or if they'd mind keeping an eye out for you. I always encourage buying physical books, objects you can have, hold, cherish, learn from, display on your bookshelf as a topic of conversation, things you can pass on to the next generation with your notes in them, things that do not depend upon electricity. Toward that end: Go to Harvard University Press for more selections available for purchase. Please support the publisher and your local booksellers. The Republican Professor is a pro-correctly-contemplating-property-rights podcast. The Republican Professor is produced and hosted by Dr. Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D. Warmly, Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D. The Republican Professor Podcast The Republican Professor Newsletter on Substack https://therepublicanprofessor.substack.com/ https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/podcast/ https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/articles/ YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublicanProfessor Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRepublicanProfessor Twitter: @RepublicanProf Instagram: @the_republican_professor

Most ultra runners have a race calendar that looks impressive and a performance trajectory that doesn't match it.Here's why: racing is eating the cake. Training is making it. And if you're racing every other weekend — or hammering yourself in training like every session is a time trial — you're eating cake you haven't baked yet.In this episode I break down the A, B, C race framework: what it actually means, how to use it properly, and why getting this wrong is one of the most common reasons experienced runners plateau, burn out, or keep having disappointing race days despite putting in the work.What's covered:The cake analogy and why it applies to how you train, not just how you raceThe real difference between A, B and C races (and how to be honest about which is which)Why A races should be no more than 2–3 times a year and what that actually makes possibleHow racing your training is sabotaging your resultsA simple audit to fix your race calendar todayIf you've ever finished a race wondering why your fitness didn't show up then this episode is probably the answer.

PWTorch editor Wade Keller is joined by PWTorch's Paul Weigle. They discuss the Brock Lesnar surprise return and how the "retirement" moment after losing to Oba Femi can be made into total storyline canon that doesn't frame the retirement as a misdirection swerve that people should be angry about. Also, a look at where this Brock-Oba situation could be headed, thoughts on Austin Theory in the main even against Seth, Becky Lynch and Sol Ruca, various ways the Roman Reigns-Jacob Fatu-Usos could be brilliant storytelling that all works out or bankrupt storytelling that is a manifestation of flaws in WWE's booking mindset. All mixed with live caller and chat interactions throughout, plus French Fries as the Analogy of the Night.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wade-keller-pro-wrestling-post-shows--3275545/support.

Sign up for our e-newsletter today!                                 --------Thank you for listening! Your support of Joni and Friends helps make this show possible. Joni and Friends envisions a world where every person with a disability finds hope, dignity, and their place in the body of Christ. Become part of the global movement today at www.joniandfriends.org. Find more encouragement on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube.

Favour Obasi-ike, MBA, MS guides listeners through the foundational role of URLs in digital visibility and SEO for 2026. URLs serve as digital identities for every webpage; their language and structure determine how easily search engines and AI platforms can find and rank your content. By adopting precise, location- and intent-based URL strategies—and regularly reviewing for duplication or outdated naming—websites can dramatically improve both local and global search performance.Further, Favour Obasi-ike explains upcoming trends, including Google's move toward localized and entity-based search, and emphasizes taking action for long-term organic traffic.Who Is This For?This episode is for entrepreneurs, business owners, digital marketers, content creators, and anyone building or managing a website in 2026 who wants to improve SEO, increase visibility, and better understand the critical role of URLs and digital real estate in organic search results.Ready to Rank? Book Your SEO & Web Dev Services Today

Most product decisions get made by analogy. Someone says, "This is how we've always done it," or "This is what the market expects," or "This is what the competition is doing." The room nods. The decision gets made. And buried somewhere in the middle of all of it is an assumption nobody checked. First-principles thinking is the discipline of identifying assumptions before the market finds them for you. By the end of this episode, you'll have the tools to strip any problem down to what's actually true and build answers that hold, even when the boardroom is watching, and the clock is running. What Is First Principles Thinking? First principles thinking is the practice of breaking a problem down to its fundamental truths, then building your solution up from what actually holds. Not from industry convention. Not from what worked last time. From what's actually true about the problem in front of you. The alternative is reasoning by analogy: doing what worked before, doing what competitors do, doing what the category expects. Analogy is faster and usually right. It fails badly when the thing that used to be true stops being true and nobody notices. Why Assumptions Go Unchecked In 2005, HP's CEO, Mark Hurd, stopped me in the hallway at Building 20 in Palo Alto and drilled me on HP's R&D funding. The metric he focused on was R&D as a percentage of revenue. He wanted HP's ratio to look more like Acer's. I pushed back. I argued we should be comparing ourselves to Apple, not Acer. Mark didn't hesitate. "We are not Apple, and we never will be." What stopped me in that moment wasn't the disagreement. It was the certainty. Nobody in the room questioned whether R&D as a percentage of revenue actually measured what we thought it measured. That metric had been in use for decades. Every competitor used it. Every analyst tracked it. It felt like bedrock. It wasn't. It was an inherited constraint that had calcified into a rule. R&D as a percentage of revenue tells you about accounting categories. It tells you nothing about what that spending produces, whether the right problems are being attacked, or whether innovation output is growing or shrinking. The assumption underneath the metric had never been tested. Nobody had ever asked whether comparing R&D ratios across companies with entirely different business models actually tells you anything meaningful. The cost of that unchecked assumption didn't show up in the next quarter. It showed up over the following decade. HP's innovation pipeline quietly drained, and the Fast Company "Most Innovative" recognition we'd earned three years running disappeared with it. One inherited metric, accepted as fact by an entire room of experienced people, making a generational decision. That's what derivative thinking actually costs. Not a bad quarter. A decade. The people in that room weren't careless. They were experienced. Experience is exactly what makes inherited assumptions feel like facts. The metric felt like a fact. It was a choice nobody remembered making. That's exactly what a first principles question would have caught. Nobody asked it. The Three Core Skills The three skills run in sequence, and each one depends on the one before it. The first, Strip the Assumptions, finds the inherited assumptions baked into how the problem was framed. From there, Test What Remains and Build Up takes what survived and builds your solution from what's actually true. Finally, When to Use First Principles tells you when the process is worth running in the first place. Skip ahead, and the later skills don't hold. Run them in order, and they compound.  Strip the Assumptions Before you can reason from first principles, you have to know what you're actually working with. Most problems arrive already carrying assumptions in how they're framed. Your first job is to find them. Steps to strip assumptions: Write the problem exactly as it was given to you. Don't improve the framing yet. Use their words. Underline every word that implies a constraint. "Must," "can't," "always," "never," "the only way to." Each one is a candidate. Ask, for each constraint: is this physically true, or is it inherited? A physical truth holds regardless of what you decide. An inherited constraint is someone's prior decision that calcified into a rule. Set the inherited constraints aside and restate what remains. This is the real problem. It's usually smaller and easier to solve than what you started with. Treat what survives as your design constraints. These are your real boundaries. Take this list into your brainstorming, and test every idea against what's on it, not against the assumptions you crossed out. This step takes 20 minutes when you do it honestly. Most teams skip it entirely, then spend months optimizing a solution to the wrong problem. Test What Remains and Build Up Not every constraint is an assumption. Some things are actually true: physics, unit economics, human behavior at scale. The goal isn't to pretend those constraints don't exist. It's to be precise about which reality you're dealing with. Steps to test what remains and build up: Take each surviving constraint and push on it. Ask: Is this true because it's physically impossible to change, or because changing it would be expensive, unfamiliar, or uncomfortable? Expensive and unfamiliar are not the same as impossible. Separate the hard limits from the soft ones. Hard limits are what's actually true: things that hold regardless of how the problem is reframed. Soft limits are negotiable. Label them clearly. Most teams never make this distinction and treat every constraint as if it were granite. State your hard limits in plain language.  Write it down. One sentence per hard limit. These are the actual boundaries your solution has to honor. Reason forward from what remains. Don't start from where the industry is and work backward to justify it. Now ask: what solution do the hard limits support?  That last step is where unexpected solutions come from. When you reason backward from convention, you arrive at a modified version of the existing answer. The shape is familiar because you started with it. When you reason forward from hard limits, you land somewhere the category didn't expect, because you weren't anchored to the shape of the existing answer. Solutions built this way often feel strange at first. People will question them. That discomfort is usually a signal you've found something real rather than something inherited. That's what reasoning from what's actually true produces, rather than reasoning from what everyone assumed. When to Use First Principles Before running the process, ask these four questions. One yes is enough. Has the environment this decision was built for changed significantly? Does every solution on the table feel like a variation of the same thing? Is the current approach inherited rather than chosen? Would a bad assumption here cost you more than an afternoon to find and fix? If all four are no, past experience is the right tool. Use it.  The 20-minute assumption-strip is cheap. The cost of skipping it isn't. The Assumption Reversal Exercise For this exercise, you will need a partner. Have them watch this video first. They need to know what an inherited assumption looks like before they can spot yours. Once you're both ready, grab the free First Principles Thinking Checklist at innovation.tools or find the link in the description. It gives you both a shared reference point before you start.  Here is how it works: Each person brings one real problem. Something current, with actual stakes. Not a thought experiment. The problem should be one you've been turning over in your mind without arriving at a satisfying answer. Work on your partner's problem, not your own. You are trying to find the assumptions baked into how they've framed it. They are doing the same for yours. The reason this works is that you can see their inherited constraints more clearly than they can. You're not inside their problem the way they are. Each person lists every assumption they can find in the other's problem. Write them down. Don't argue yet. Don't evaluate. Just surface as many as possible. Quantity matters here. The obvious assumptions are easy. Push past them. Take each assumption and reverse it. If the assumption is "this requires a significant budget," the reversal is "what becomes possible if it requires no budget?" If the assumption is "the customer won't accept a different format," the reversal is "what would we build if they would?" Don't ask whether the reversal is realistic. Ask what it opens up. Discuss what the reversals revealed. Not every reversed assumption leads somewhere useful. But one of them usually exposes a constraint that was never as fixed as it felt. That's the one worth following. The point of the reversal is simple. Some assumptions hold when you push on them, and some don't. You can't tell which is which until you try. The Long Game Every time you run this process and find something that didn't hold, you get faster at spotting them. The judgment about when to use it gets sharper. That's what improvement looks like in practice: not a dramatic flash of insight, but a practiced ability to find the assumption in the room before it finds you. The assumption that costs you most isn't the one you haven't thought of yet. It's the one you stopped questioning years ago.  Find your partner. Run the Assumption Reversal this week. That's where this starts becoming a skill. Subscribe for the next episode. It builds on this.

Craig and CMAC debate the reliability of Anthony Volpe at shortstop using a unique airline pilot analogy after Jose Caballero's move to the IL. They also preview the Jets' season opener against the Dolphins and share strong opinions on wedding entertainment. 01:00 - Shortstop Pilot Analogy 06:27 - Jets Start And Catering 12:33 - New York Injury Updates

I want to discuss one of the most important decisions you make in a job interview. It happens before you ever start speaking. It's not how you tell your story. It's which story you choose. Most candidates default to the example they like the most. The one they're most proud of. The one that feels the most impressive. But that's not what determines whether it lands. The story that sells you best is the one that fixes what's hurting them right now. When you choose the right story, your value becomes immediate and obvious. You don't have to work as hard to explain it. You don't have to hope they connect the dots. They see it. In this week's lesson, I share a powerful analogy that'll help you identify which story will score highest in an interview so you can make your impact clear from the start. If you'd like to build a great career and lead a rewarding life, check out some of these other places where I share my teachings: 1. Check out the milewalk Academy, my coaching and training site, for freemiums and premiums. 2. I have hundreds of educational and inspirational videos on my YouTube Channel. 3. Grab any of my four books related to career development, interviewing, hiring, and goal setting. All can be found on my Amazon Author Page. 4. Follow me on Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter (X), TikTok, Threads, and Facebook. 5. Stay in touch with me in your email inbox by joining my newsletter here! --Andy

We talked about kickoff to summer and Eddie's last supper. Chris Russo talked about a deer ‘running around without its head'.

We are officially entering the "Multi-AI Era." Much like the multi-cloud times, organizations are no longer just using a single AI tool like Microsoft Copilot, they are building custom, agentic workflows using diverse third-party models and MCP servers . In this episode, Ashish sits down with Shawn Hays from Varonis to discuss why the security market has over-pivoted on AISPM (AI Security Posture Management) . Shawn spoke about how having visibility and an inventory of your AI models is a great start, but it fails to secure the enterprise if you lack the guardrails to actually stop an agent from going off the rails and exfiltrating data . Shawn breaks down the components of a robust AI security platform (like Varonis Atlas) and explains why data security is inseparable from AI security. He spoke about why AI agents will blindly "read whatever is on the teleprompter," meaning your AI is only as secure as the data access and identity controls surrounding it . Tune in to learn how to apply Zero Trust across the entire AI chain from the prompter to the cloud infrastructure Guest Socials -⁠⁠ Shawn's Linkedin Podcast Twitter - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@CloudSecPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠If you want to watch videos of this LIVE STREAMED episode and past episodes - Check out our other Cloud Security Social Channels:-⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Cloud Security Podcast- Youtube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Cloud Security Newsletter ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠If you are interested in AI Security, you can check out our sister podcast -⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ AI Security Podcast⁠Questions asked:(00:00) Introduction(02:50) Shawn's Background: Microsoft, CMMC, and Varonis (03:50) The Biggest AI Security Challenges (Copilot to Agentic AI) (05:50) Third-Party AI Risk (Jira and Salesforce Agents) (08:40) The Connector Ecosystem Danger (Copilot + Salesforce) (11:50) 8 Distinct Areas of an AI Security Platform (Varonis Atlas) (14:00) Entering the "Multi-AI Era" (Analogies to Multi-Cloud) (16:00) The AI Bill of Materials (Athena AI & Grammarly) (20:50) Why Data Security and AI Security are Intertwined (22:00) Applying Zero Trust to the Entire AI Chain (24:50) The Role of Identity and ITDR in AI Systems (27:00) HIPAA, OCR, and Regulating AI Data Access (31:30) Creating a Governance Plan for Microsoft Copilot (33:50) Securing Pro-Code AI Systems (AWS Bedrock & MCP Servers) (38:30) Why the Security Market is Over-Pivoting on AISPM (44:10) The "Ron Burgundy" Analogy for AI Agents (45:50) Fun Questions: Crocodile & Caramel Tasting (47:20) The Ed Sheeran & Yelawolf Mixtape Connection (48:50) Hobbies & Pride: DJing Weddings and Playing Ice Hockey in Alabama (51:50) Favorite Food: Alabama White Sauce BBQ & Milo's BurgersResources spoken about during the episode:Varonis Atlas

Seth and Sean power rank the post-draft power rankings by the various outlets based on how they see the Texans, discuss if the Rockets can keep it going with a win in game 5 vs the Lakers, the best analogy they've heard yet for the whole Vrabel-Russini situation, and see what Reggie and Lopez's question of the day is.

What if marriage isn't just about a husband and wife getting along and having kids? What if God designed it for a greater purpose that goes beyond the home into the foundation of the gospel itself? Join us as we look at the depths of God's purpose for marriage. 

On this episode of Timeless Wisdom, Dennis Prager explores the pursuit of happiness. He discusses the importance of knowing oneself and how it relates to happiness, citing the words of a Harvard psychologist who says, "You cannot be happy if you do not know yourself." Dennis shares his own experiences and insights on what brings him happiness, including his love of music and his daily joys. He also delves into the concept of frequency vs. intensity of positive events in life, and how daily pleasures can lead to long-term happiness. Follow on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/timeless-wisdom-with-dennis-prager/id1517302239 Follow us on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4SZEYeH4tuLr2FvG4ok1rl Learn more about Dennis Prager: https://pragertopia.com/ Follow Dennis on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DennisPrager Follow Dennis on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thedennisprager/ Follow Dennis on X: https://x.com/DennisPrager Learn more about the Salem Podcast Network: https://salempodcastnetwork.com/ Discover more Christian podcasts at lifeaudio.com and inquire about advertising opportunities at lifeaudio.com/contact-us.

Get my 9 Minute Kettlebell and Bodyweight Challenge HERE =>  https://www.9MinuteChallenge.com   On this splendiferous episode with the great Clif Harski we dig deep into:  Limitations of Only Training the Fundamentals Critique of the "inch wide, mile deep" philosophy when it becomes a narrow trench Analogy of digging a foundation but never building the house Indiana Jones / Holy Grail analogy for strength that only works under ultra-specific conditions Over-Reliance on the "Big Six" Kettlebell Lifts Why double front rack squats aren't the ultimate lower-body lift for strong lifters Geometry and grip limitations with heavy kettlebells Need for asymmetrical stances, different holding positions, and varied loading strategies Form vs. Getting Strong Critique of obsessing over perfect form at the expense of progress Example: Difference between cleaning a light bell vs. a heavy "beast" and why they can't (and shouldn't) look identical How rigid standards in cert environments differ from what's safe and productive in real-world training Single-Leg & Unilateral Work Value of lunges, single-leg hinges, and kickstand variations for strength and athletic carryover Why lunges are often unfairly maligned in the kettlebell world How bringing up weaker single-leg patterns can improve bilateral lifts Power, Explosiveness & "Construction Man Muscles" Cliff's argument that training for power maintains strength better than grinding strength maintains power Story of high-rep double beast cleans and the toll on grip/skin vs. systemic fatigue Separation between muscles that make you "look jacked" or lift heavy (back, traps, grip) vs. muscles that make you jump higher and move faster (legs and hips) Aging, Athleticism & Movement Quality How loss of explosiveness is an obvious sign of aging Using kettlebells for safe high-volume power work vs. the limitations and risks of high-volume jumping/sprinting Examples of explosive non-kettlebell work (clap pushups, box jumps) and how kettlebells complement or substitute for them Why Kettlebells Are Uniquely Suited to "Athletic" Training Kettlebells as tools for multi-directional, explosive, and athletic patterns Comparison with barbells and dumbbells for the same purposes Critique of treating kettlebell training like "barbell lite" (purely bilateral, anti-rotation, simplified patterns) Dogma, Branding & Narrow Messages in the Kettlebell World Discussion of how simple, rigid branding (e.g., "just the basics," "Simple & Sinister forever") can overshadow nuance How organizational culture, "good soldier" behavior, and seeking approval from "upper echelons" feed dogma Aleks's example of pushback on his hike-position power swing despite praise from Mark Reifkind Variety, Programming & Long-Term Progress The "magic" of any new focused program for 1–3 months and why people keep thinking each new program is "the one" Concept of maintaining baseline strength while rotating focus to new qualities (jumping, unilateral strength, new skills) Limitations of kettlebell progress without access to very heavy bells and why variety in stance and load is essential Training Frequency & the "3x/Week for 30 Minutes" Meme Cliff's concept of "founderitis" and selection bias in program marketing Why 3x30 works great for novices or detrained folks, but isn't a universal, permanent solution Discussion of when and how to add more days or volume intelligently Science vs. Art in Strength & Hypertrophy Training Hypertrophy chat: 5 reps vs. 20 reps, and why individual response and enjoyment matter Argument that training is as much art as science, especially for long-term adherence How personal preference, fun, and life context shape effective programming Inclusivity vs. Tribalism in Fitness "Death is winning, do something" – why almost any modality is better than doing nothing Caution against dismissing other methods or modalities (Pilates, etc.) that genuinely get people moving The real goal for most people: health, broad capacity, and resilience—not niche over-specialization Bell Fest: Kettlebell Festival & Community Origin story of Bell Fest and how Cliff got involved Description of Bell Fest as a kettlebell party: community vibe, variety of styles, supportive environment Shift from purely brutal workouts to more education-focused sessions Lineup highlights: Cliff Harsky, Dave Whitley, Denis Vasilev, and others Practical info: dates, Austin location, CEUs, pricing, and discount code via FKT Emphasis on Bell Fest as a place to see many different kettlebell styles coexist in one event Wrap-Up & Where to Find Cliff Cliff's social media: @cliftonharski and @functionalkettlebelltraining https://www.instagram.com/cliftonharski?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=ZDNlZDc0MzIxNw==  Website: functionalkettlebelltraining.com On that note:  If you like training that: · Gives you more strength than it takes from you · Improves your stamina and resilience simultaneously · Powers-up every nook, cranny, crevice, and corner of your Soft Machine Then you just might like my 9-Minute Kettlebell and Bodyweight Challenge. As the name indicates, it's just 9 minutes long, and it's designed to be done WITH your current workouts – NOT instead of them. Even cooler: Many find that it actually amplifies their strength in their favorite kettlebell and bodyweight moves, like presses, squats, pullups, and more. And best of all, it's free. How free? I'm talkin' freer than the 4th of July, my friend. Get thee thine own copy here:  https://www.9MinuteChallenge.com   Have fun and happy training! Aleks Salkin

Have you ever heard echoes of the Genesis patriarchs in the story of David? If so, you're not alone! Join us as we speak with Joanna Kline about her monograph, Narrative Analogy in the David Story (Mohr Siebeck, 2024) where she brings out parallels between Genesis 22-50 and 1 Samuel 16-1 Kings 2. Joanna Kline earned her PhD from Harvard University, and is Assistant Professor of Old Testament at Gordon College. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

This podcast shows you how to fully recover from OCD.Each episode breaks down the exact techniques and nuances that stop rumination, reduce compulsions, and help you retrain your brain out of the OCD cycle. We cover every major OCD theme, including:Pure-O OCDRelationship OCDHarm OCDReal Event OCDSO-OCD / Sexuality OCDReligious / Scrupulosity OCDCleaning & Contamination OCDPhysical CompulsionsAll other OCD subtypesMy goal is simple: clear guidance that actually works, explained in a way that is calm, direct, and easy to apply immediately.You can fully recover from OCD. Don't give up — you're not stuck, and your brain can change.

Today's slightly bizarre pizza analogy is designed to help you honour you needs and seasons, and remind you that you're doing okay!

2.Michael Vlahos as Germanicus joins Gaius in examining the elite obsession with Jeffrey Epstein through a historical lens of witchcraft and sorcery accusations. Gaius introduces an analogy involving Louis XIII using accusations of witchcraft to explain political assassinations, applying this framework to the modern overclass fascination with Epstein. He suggests elites cast Epstein as a sorcerer figure to absolve themselves of complicity in his crimes and their own participation in corruption. Germanicus agrees, arguing that the atheistic ruling class deploys Epstein as a fallen angel archetype, framing him as an unstoppable supernatural force of seduction so they can claim victimhood rather than confronting systemic corruption. Germanicus illustrates this dynamic with a story from The Howling about monks imprisoning the devil to prevent war, symbolizing humanity's desire to externalize evil rather than confront personal sin. The sheer volume of released Epstein files acts as contracts for sold souls, reinforcing the narrative that an external devil bears responsibility. Germanicus concludes these elites are cynical materialists who, unable to comprehend spiritual dynamics or acknowledge their own guilt, retreat to ancient superstitions to explain their entrapment and exonerate themselves from the corrupt world they lead.3.Michael Vlahos as Germanicus explores with Gaius the seventeenth-century practice of dynastic marriage as a superior geopolitical tool compared to modern warfare's impulse toward total destruction. Gaius highlights the unions connecting the Hapsburg, Bourbon, and Stuart empires, observing that the magic of resolving conflict through marriage has been lost entirely. Germanicus explains that these networks of bloodlines created a unified European sensibility and stability that limited war's severity because monarchs were cousins bound by family obligation and shared aristocratic culture. Wars remained limited affairs rather than existential struggles for national survival. Germanicus attributes the loss of this restraint to the French Revolution, which replaced aristocratic connections with religious nationalism and a Darwinian struggle for survival, culminating in the total wars of the twentieth century that devastated entire civilizations. While true dynastic geopolitics has vanished from international relations, Germanicus observes a strange egalitarian counterpart emerging in the American overclass through the nepo baby phenomenon. He argues that elite families in Hollywood and politics now pass down wealth and status across generations, mimicking aristocratic patterns without the intergenerational stability, diplomatic utility, or civilizational responsibility characteristic of Roman senatorial families or royal European houses.