Podcasts about repair act

Roy Littlefield IV is the Vice President of Government Affairs for the Tire Industry Association. In his role, Roy leads advocacy efforts across state and federal levels to support independent tire and auto repair shops. With deep roots in the industry — his father also served in TIA leadership — Roy has been involved in policy from a young age. He now champions initiatives like the Right to Repair Act, helping protect consumer choice and shop independence nationwide. In this episode… The modern vehicle repair landscape is becoming more exclusive, locking out independent repair shops and consumers from essential data. As cloud-based systems and EV technology evolve, traditional tools like OBD2 ports are being phased out, creating barriers to access. How can the industry and lawmakers ensure fair repair rights for everyone? According to Roy Littlefield IV of the Tire Industry Association, the key lies in mobilizing grassroots support and pushing for bipartisan legislation. Roy explains how right to repair laws, such as those in Maine and Massachusetts, are being held up in court despite overwhelming public support. He also reveals the strategic moves being made to pass a federal Repair Act that would secure nationwide access to vehicle repair data. On this episode of Gain Traction, Mike Edge welcomes Roy for a conversation about the right to repair movement, legislative hurdles, and how independent shop owners can take action. Roy shares insights on consumer rights, industry trends, and the importance of grassroots advocacy. Here's a glimpse of what you'll learn:  [02:10] Why Right to Repair is the most urgent issue facing the auto industry [03:25] How EVs and new tech give OEMs the upper hand in the repair market [05:08] The challenge of cloud-based systems replacing traditional OBD2 ports [10:44] Roy Littlefield IV and Mike Edge share personal stories of inflated dealership repair estimates [11:33] How VIP Tire and Auto led a Right to Repair victory in Maine [12:45] Why automakers claim they "can't comply" with basic consumer access laws [15:44] How bipartisan support is building for national legislation [16:25] Grassroots advocacy and how shop owners can make an impact Resources mentioned in this episode: Roy Littlefield IV on LinkedIn Tire Industry Association Report a Right to Repair Issue Brian Bates on LinkedIn EAS Tire and Auto Mike Edge on LinkedIn Tread Partners Quotable Moments:  “Right to repair is the biggest issue right now facing the industry, and it's going to hit us like an avalanche.” “Consumers should have the right to decide who works on their vehicle — and own that information.” “Even something as simple as an oil change is becoming a problem because of data lockouts.” “Despite 80% of voters supporting it, one lawsuit can hold up progress for years.” “Every person matters — whether you're an intern or a CEO, everyone deserves respect and recognition.” Action Steps:  Report blocked repair access: Submit your issue via the TIA advocacy page so it can be used in legal and legislative efforts. Contact your lawmakers: Speak to your local, state, and federal representatives about how Right to Repair affects your business. Educate consumers: Let customers know they have a choice — and a right — to get their vehicle serviced outside the dealership. Display QR codes in your shop: Use TIA's printable posters with QR codes to make it easy for your team to report issues. Support the federal Repair Act: Encourage your trade networks to back bipartisan legislation ensuring nationwide repair access. Sponsor for this episode... This episode is brought to you by Tread Partners.  At Tread Partners, we provide digital marketing for multi-location tire dealers and auto repair shops.  By using our strategy, branding, and marketing services, we help shops sell more tires and put more cars in bays. We've helped companies like Action Gator Tire, Colony Tire and Service, and Ulmer's Auto Care Center bring extreme growth in paid leads, ROI, and searches.  So, what are you waiting for? Visit www.treadpartners.com or email info@treadpartners.com to learn more.

In this episode, Braxton starts with a confession. Evidently, keeping good care of tires is not his strong suit. He then talks about legislative updates on the REPAIR Act (HR 1566) and the latest advocacy efforts in California, along with details on SEMA and AAPEX registration for this year's Las Vegas events. Plus, Braxton highlights California's new Cool Air Rebate Program for vehicle A/C repair and introduces an AI-driven sales coaching platform for repair shops.00:00 Automotive Repair News Podcast03:23 Tire Maintenance and Podcast Evolution08:48 Cool Air Rebate Launching May10:27 "AIX for Auto Repair Shops"

In this episode of DriveTime, as the VISION conference kicked off in Chicago, Bill Long, president and CEO of MEMA, The Vehicle Suppliers Association, and Paul McCarthy, president of MEMA Aftermarket Suppliers, addressed supplier sentiment about the current state of the aftermarket, describing it as a mix of urgency and cautious optimism. Industry leaders agree there's never been a more critical time for suppliers to come together, given the wide range of challenges: tariffs, shifting sourcing strategies, profitability pressures, the REPAIR Act, consolidation, and talent and technology concerns. VISION's mission to clarify what success looks like now — and in the future — has never been more relevant.Resilience and OpportunityDespite these challenges, there is strong resilience and opportunity in the aftermarket, stressed Long and McCarthy. While 2024 wasn't a standout sales year, midterm indicators — vehicle age, miles driven and VIO — remain solid. Technology, especially ADAS, is emerging as a key growth area. New research shared at VISION signals that innovation may soon deliver real gains in efficiency and margin. As near-term disruption continues and long-term strategies evolve, suppliers are relying on collaboration and insight to move forward.REPAIR Act Automotive Impact: Supplier Sentiment and Industry Outlook The REPAIR Act (H.R. 1566) is considered essential for the industry's future, Long and McCarthy stressed. Introduced by Rep. Neal Dunn (R-FL-02), this bipartisan bill protects consumer choice, fair market competition and property rights — especially as telematics and over-the-air updates create new barriers. Long and McCarthy emphasized the urgency of passing the bill within this Congressional session — the next 20 months — and underscore that victory will come from continued grassroots action and engagement at the local level.To hear more details about Long's and McCarthy's aftermarket perspective, make sure to watch the video above.Episode Overview:• Supplier sentiment about the current state of the automotive aftermarket (1:10)• Legislative issues and the impact to supplier member businesses (6:02)• Current state of affairs of REPAIR Act legislation (12:36)• Goals of the MEMA Aftermarket Suppliers Training Council (19:25)• Aftermarket Outlook 2025…what did MEMA get right and what did MEMA get wrong? (21:54)• Lightning Round (32:37).

This week's full broadcast of Computer Talk Radio includes - 00:00 - Nerd news for normal people - REPAIR Act, bad law, Tesla lawsuit, Sams Club, Comcast - 11:00 - Listener Q&A - cost of GPUs - Derek asks why gaming GPUs high priced after crypto decline - 22:00 - One week after with iPad Air M3 - Benjamin gives Keith a one week update on his new iPad Air M3 - 31:00 - Marty Winston's Wisdom - Marty talks up the Shokz Opencomm 2 UC 2025 headset - 39:00 - Scam Series - crazy job offer - Benjamin talks insane job offer for hour a day, thousands a week - 44:00 - Keske on cyberstalking - Steve and Benjamin talk the technophobia of older generations - 56:00 - Listener Q&A - long support calls - Benjamin answers Ethan on why tech support calls are long - 1:07:00 - Emergency preparedness - Benjamin shares emergency preparedness, including tech ideas - 1:16:00 - IT Professional Series - 323 - Lisa's boss asked for her passwords and Benjamin says no - 1:24:00 - Listener Q&A - social media - Isabella asks if social media is truly designed to addict users

In this episode, we cover all the things YOU NEED TO KNOW about the automotive repair industry. From the rise in tire scams affecting New Hampshire auto shops, to the progress of the Repair Act in Congress. Braxton Critcher also talks about the Automotive Aftermarket Charitable Foundation and all the good things and changes they are working on! What do you think about today's format? Love, hate, ehhh it was okay? Let me know! Email me at braxton@automotiverepairnews.com

Lisa Foshee is the Senior Vice President of Government Affairs and General Counsel at Auto Care Association. She joins us on the show today to talk about the Repair act- https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/906A bill that requires a motor vehicle manufacturer to provide to a vehicle's owner  in-vehicle data generated by the vehicle that is related to diagnostics, repair, service, wear, and calibration of systems of the vehicle. We'll talk about how this bill is related to the Right to Repair act, how it affects you as a technician, and how you can get involved. See the link belowhttps://www.autocare.org/https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/7151632/Automotive-Repair-RestrictionsWebsite- https://autodiagpodcast.com/Facebook Group- https://www.facebook.com/groups/223994012068320/YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/@automotivediagnosticpodcas8832Email- STmobilediag@gmail.comPlease make sure to check out our sponsors!SJ Auto Solutions- https://sjautosolutions.com/Automotive Seminars- https://automotiveseminars.com/L1 Automotive Training- https://www.l1training.com/Autorescue tools- https://autorescuetools.com/       

Do you use a DVI at your shop? Is it certified? If not, get a free DVI certification today and take your shop to the next level! CLICK HERE!Today on the pod, you'll get all you need to know about what's going on in the industry! The Trump administration announced a pause on the 25% tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, now allowing further trade policy discussions that affect Canada and Mexico.The introduction of the Tech Training HU Hub aims to streamline access to automotive tech training, offering technicians and owners the ability to search for various certifications without requiring membership.Ford has issued recalls for certain Maverick trucks from 2022 and 2023 due to instrument cluster and ABS system issues, with dealerships tasked with implementing necessary repairs.

Switching Shop Management Systems isn't as hard as you think! Give Shop Controller a try HEREIf your DVI isn't certified, you're losing customers! Get a FREE certification when you touch HERE!Today, Braxton Critcher shares his thoughts about this year's Vision Hi-Tech Expo and Training in Kansas City. S/O Chad Schnitz of TopDon for the help on the show floor. Additionally, he discusses the industry's underutilization of current technology, as learned in his conversation with Chris Cotton. Lastly, Braxton shares that a discussion with Lisa Foshee changed his mind on when he thought the Repair Act bill would be passed. 00:00 Networking and Friendships in Industry03:50 "Grateful for Chad's Support"08:28 Bipartisan Repair Act Prospects Discussed10:09 "Discussing Negative Feedback Positively"13:38 Podcast Growth and Upcoming Events

Switching Shop Management Systems isn't as hard as you think! Give Shop Controller a try HEREIf your DVI isn't certified, you're losing customers! Get a FREE certification when you touch HERE!Lisa Foshee is the Senior Vice President, Government Affairs and General Counsel for the Auto Care Association. Today, she gives an update about the just re-introduced repair act bill in Congress. Will it get passed this time? Where is it on the Trump Administration's priority list? And why do automakers care so much about withholding information? Braxton and Lisa get into all this. 00:00 "Renewed Legislative Efforts Underway"05:44 "Industry Efforts Enable Lobbying Pause"08:00 Legal Victory, Appeal, and Federal Push12:23 Trump's US-Focused Tariff Strategy14:46 Tariff Uncertainty Strains Businesses17:20 "Subscribe and Connect for Updates"

Do you use a DVI at your shop? Is it certified? If not, get a free DVI certification today and take your shop to the next level! CLICK HERE!In today's episode, Braxton Critcher will give you what you need to know about the top stories happening right now in the repair industry. Here is a little of what to expect.The reintroduction of the Repair Act aims to ensure consumer choice and fair competition in vehicle repair data access.Honda shifts production of its next generation Civic Hybrid from Mexico to Indiana in response to new tariffs.CarParts.com announces Fix It Day 2025, providing free car repairs to families affected by the Southern California wildfires.Nissan considers replacing CEO Makoto Uchida amid financial struggles and the failed Honda merger.Transtar Aftermarket Solutions expands inventory to include general repair parts across over 50 locations.

Ram Ramcharger info, F-150 Taillight fix, REPAIR Act, Durango class action Lightning lease deals, Stelantis financial results, 9-second Hurricane, Viper Wrangler swap, and weird recalls, The Truck Show Podcast is proudly presented by Nissan in association with AMSOIL, Kershaw Knives, and OVR Mag.

Switching Shop Management Systems isn't as hard as you think! Give Shop Controller a try HEREIf your DVI isn't certified, you're losing customers! Get a FREE certification when you touch HERE!Michael Smith is from The Institute for Automotive Business Excellence Today, there is a shift in leadership in the United States. But what other shifts may we see because of that one? How may it affect the automotive industry? Michael talks about the Trump administration and what he expects to see. He emphasizes that the long-standing "mom and pop" shop model may be coming to an end. Is that a good thing? Michael says that repair shop owners must adapt by either aligning with consolidation trends or stepping up their involvement in reshaping the automotive industry.00:00 Transitioning to New Industry05:04 Generational Shift in Industry Improvements08:37 "Value Lacking in Firms for Investment"11:52 Online Shift and Corporate Consolidation13:52 Automotive Market Shift to Free Market17:30 Adapting Mom-and-Pop Auto Shops20:06 Shifting Auto Industry Dynamics22:31 Return to Free Market Focus28:21 "Automotive Industry Perspectives"29:48 Tesla's Influence and Automotive Conflict33:30 Hope for Bipartisan Collaboration37:24 Branding for Community Service Providers38:46 Empowering Local Business Leadership

Roy Littlefield IV currently serves as Vice President of Government Affairs for the Tire Industry Association. He currently works on both state and federal legislation and has testified and submitted testimony on a variety of issues impacting the industry. Roy also helps to publish a variety of legislative newsletters for the Tire Industry Association. Sam Felberbaum is the President of Prinx and Fortune brand tires. He has over 20 years of experience helping companies grow and improve customer retention and revenue. He has spent the last two years in his role at Prinx Chengshan Tire and previously worked for eight years at Toyo Tires. Lance Bullock is the President of OE Wheels, 4PLAY Wheels, and Defiant Wheels. Lance has contributed to the modernization, direction, and growth of OE Wheels for over two decades. The company's Defiant Wheel recently won a SEMA design award. Norris Marshall is Co-founder of Blueprint Engines and serves on the board for SEMA. His company manufactures crate engines for a variety of makes and models and strives to make it easier for enthusiasts to modify their vehicles. Michael Mathis is the President of Atturo Tires. Atturo had a record-breaking year, increasing brand awareness through sports sponsorships and a national TV campaign. The company is launching the Trailblade HT, a new all-weather tire, and adding 20 new sizes to their A810 performance tire. In this episode… The automotive aftermarket industry is facing challenges and opportunities as technology evolves and consumer preferences shift. How are industry leaders addressing issues like right to repair, product innovation, and market expansion? According to Roy Littlefield IV, Sam Felberbaum, Lance Bullock, Norris Marshall, and Michael Mathis, the industry is actively working on several fronts. They emphasize the importance of right to repair legislation, with efforts being made at both state and federal levels to ensure independent repair shops can access vehicle repair information. Product innovation is also a key focus, with companies developing new tire designs, wheel styles, and engine solutions to meet changing consumer demands. Additionally, these leaders highlight the significance of trade shows like SEMA for networking, showcasing new products, and building relationships with customers and partners. On this episode of Gain Traction, join host Mike Edge at SEMA, where he talks to Roy, Sam, Lance, Norris, and Michael about right to repair legislation, new product launches, the importance of face-to-face interactions at trade shows, sports marketing strategies, and the value of industry associations like SEMA. They also discuss market trends, product innovations, and strategies for growth in the automotive aftermarket industry. Here's a glimpse of what you'll learn:  [02:20] How TIA advocates for the tire industry at SEMA [04:02] The progress of the Right to Repair Act [06:01] Prinx and Fortune's innovative strategies at SEMA [08:53] The evolution of aftermarket wheels with OE and 4Play [11:16] How BluePrint Engines easily enhances car performance [12:10] SEMA's impact on building industry relationships [14:27] Ayturo Tires' new releases and sports marketing success Resources mentioned in this episode: Roy Littlefield IV on LinkedIn  Tire Industry Association Sam Felberbaum on LinkedIn Prinx Chengshan Tire Fortune Tire Lance Bullock on LinkedIn OE Wheels  4PLAY Wheels Defiant Wheels Norris Marshall on LinkedIn BluePrint Engines Michael Mathis on LinkedIn Atturo Tires SEMA Show Mike Edge on LinkedIn Tread Partners Quotable Moments:  "We got as far as we ever have with a federal bill. The Repair Act had 56 bipartisan co-sponsors split right down the middle and for the first time we got it passed out of the subcommittee unanimously." - Roy Littlefield IV “We will have a new Prinx and Fortune AT2 product that will be launched in the second quarter of 2025 — we're very excited about that.” - Sam Felberbaum “We're very proud of our aftermarket line, 4PLAY Wheels, for trucks, Jeeps, and SUVs. That's our industry-defining patented products.” - Lance Bullock “We are a crate engine manufacturer and we manufacture engines that will go in GM cars, Ford cars, Chrysler cars. These are 100% new engines and most of the content is our own." - Norris Marshall "We were on some 200 different broadcasts for Major League Baseball games this year. We're getting into the NHL. We've got NBA courtside signage going right now. And then our national TV campaign has really done a lot to raise our brand awareness."- Michael Mathis Action Steps:  Attend industry trade shows: Engaging in events like SEMA provides a unique opportunity to meet industry leaders and potential collaborators in one place. Enhance networking skills: Networking effectively is crucial for building relationships with customers and partners.  Stay informed on legislative issues: Awareness and participation in advocacy can ensure that your business supports favorable legislation and adapts to potential regulatory changes. Leverage marketing opportunities: By exploring diverse promotional platforms, you can reach broader audiences and solidify your brand's presence in the market. Invest in product innovation: Continuously develop and introduce new products to meet evolving market demands. Sponsor for this episode... This episode is brought to you by Tread Partners.  At Tread Partners, we provide digital marketing for multi-location tire dealers and auto repair shops.  By using our strategy, branding, and marketing services, we help shops sell more tires and put more cars in bays. We've helped companies like Action Gator Tire, Colony Tire and Service, and Ulmer's Auto Care Center bring extreme growth in paid leads, ROI, and searches.  So, what are you waiting for? Visit www.treadpartners.com or email info@treadpartners.com to learn more.

Read more about this year's Women in Auto Care Award WinnersMEMA and ACA 2024 Joint EV Trends and Outlook ForecastSubmit a Nomination for the MEMA 2024 Board of DirectorsIn this episode, Braxton Critcher delves into recent developments in the automotive repair industry. Braxton highlights Yelp's acquisition of Repair Pal for $80 million, which aims to expand its services. Lisa Foshee provides an update on the Repair Act, explaining its delay and the efforts needed to reintroduce it in the next congressional session. Additionally, AAA's research shows that automatic emergency braking in new 2024 vehicles successfully avoided 100% of forward collisions at up to 35 miles an hour.Got news to share? Email Braxton! Braxton@automotiverepairnews.com Thanks to our sponsor AutoFix Auto Shop Coaching! Schedule your free strategy session here: autofixautoshopcoaching.com

Lisa Foshee, is the Senior Vice President of Government Affairs and General Counsel. She provides an update on the Repair Act, detailing its trajectory and legislative hurdles. She also sheds light on the association's workforce initiatives and highlights the importance of technician training for the industry's future.Find the Auto Care Association here00:00 Discussing The AAPEX Show, elections, and Repair Act.05:43 Plan reintroduce bill, gather co-sponsors, assess control.06:39 Strategizing Repair Act introduction in Senate.11:18 Concern over delayed legislation affecting industry control.13:36 Excited for technician training, workforce initiative progress.16:21 2025 tax law changes impact retailers universally.20:06 Subscribe, share, review, follow us everywhere! Learn more about how Shop Controller can make your shop more efficient HERE

See Ivan's workIn this episode, Braxton Critcher is joined by Ivan Rioja-Scott from Ratchet + Wrench. Ivan discusses his observations from the keynote speaker sessions at AAPEX 2024, highlighting the increase in hybrid vehicle breakdowns and the implications for repair shops. He also delves into the potential impact of Google's new verification requirements for local service ads, stressing the need for shop owners to stay informed. Furthermore, Ivan touches on the ongoing shortage of technicians and the necessity for effective EV training. 00:00 Visit Malaysia: Gateway to Southeast Asia wonders.05:08 Motorcyclists risk lives weaving through traffic.09:03 Kathleen and Aaron's engaging conversation on women.10:19 Appointed woman moderates the automotive industry panel discussion.13:03 Google AdWords changes directly impact shop businesses.16:45 Hybrid future due to infrastructure, and technician shortages.19:52 Industry subtly opposes right to repair legislation.24:19 Please like, share, subscribe, and follow us. Learn more about how Shop Controller can make your shop more efficient HERE

The mechanic shortage and rising costs of car repairs are making dealerships the main option for service as automakers monopolize vehicle data access. Independent shops struggle to afford costly software subscriptions and specialized tools required to work on modern cars, especially those with gateway computers. While new legislation, like the 2023 Repair Act, could give consumers and independent garages more rights, the shift to tech-heavy diagnostics is pushing many small garages to specialize or close. This means more car owners will face higher repair costs and fewer choices in the near future.  Link to the featured video:https://youtu.be/4xhQpAcdyuY?si=lB7kYLaQduJax90CBuy me a coffee! https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/partsmanagerproGrab a copy of my book:https://partsmanagerpro.gumroad.com/l/qtqax"The Parts Manager Guide" - https://www.amazon.com/Parts-Manager-Guide-Strategies-Maximize-ebook/dp/B09S23HQ1P/ref=sr_1_4?crid=3UZYOGZJUNJ9K&keywords=parts+manager+guide&qid=1644443157&sprefix=parts+manager+guid%2Caps%2C244&sr=8-4Please remember to like, share and leave your comments.Videos are uploaded weekly.Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS*This video is for educational and entertainment purposes only.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-auto-review-podcast-w-host-chris-clarke--4960744/support.

Braxton Critcher is joined by Eric Sponhaltz, a member of the Tool and Equipment Committee for the Auto Care Association. Eric provides an in-depth look at the Repair Act, explaining its significance for both consumers and the automotive industry. Braxton and Eric discuss the pressing need for bipartisan support to ensure access to critical vehicle data for independent repair shops.00:00 Passionate about the automotive industry's community and goals.04:24 Independent shops are essential for out-of-warranty car service.08:48 Modern vehicles are complex, like driving computers.11:19 Repair Act not considered despite significant support.14:42 Bipartisan support for the bill ensures unity.16:18 Dealers expanding services anticipating reduced control.20:02 Independent shops and dealerships should cooperate.23:13 Organizations help repair shops recover from damage.25:51 Subscribe, share, review Automotive Repair podcast. Learn more about how Shop Controller can make your shop more efficient HERE

In this episode, The Alliance of Automotive Service Providers (AASP) has announced plans to dissolve its national association by the end of the year, while continuing to support local affiliates. Additionally, the Repair Act's progress in Congress has hit a pause as representatives go on recess, with a vote expected to be reconsidered in November. Lastly, the Institute for Automotive Excellence is set to hold a hands-on training for service advisors in Ogden, Utah, focused on enhancing skills in value building, communication, and conflict resolution. Thanks to our sponsor AutoFix Auto Shop Coaching! Schedule your free strategy session here: autofixautoshopcoaching.com

You do not have the right to repair your own belongings because of intellectual property rights granted to corporations by Congress in 1998. In this episode, listen to the debate happening in Congress about if and how they should grant customers the right to repair and get a status update on the multiple efforts under way in the current Congress, including one with a good chance of becoming law. Please Support Congressional Dish – Quick Links Contribute monthly or a lump sum via Support Congressional Dish via (donations per episode) Send Zelle payments to: Donation@congressionaldish.com Send Venmo payments to: @Jennifer-Briney Send Cash App payments to: $CongressionalDish or Donation@congressionaldish.com Use your bank's online bill pay function to mail contributions to: Please make checks payable to Congressional Dish Thank you for supporting truly independent media! Background Sources Recommended Congressional Dish Episodes McDonald's Ice Cream Machines Andy Greenberg. December 14, 2023. Wired. Joseph Fawbush. March 29, 2022. FindLaw. John Deere Luke Hogg. January 8, 2024. Reason. Internet of Things Updates and Maintenance Márk Szabó. August 27, 2024. WeLiveSecurity. Massachusetts Auto Repair Law Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General. DoD's Revolving Door OpenSecrets. OpenSecrets. Karl Evers-Hillstrom and Reid Champlin. June 18, 2019. OpenSecrets. OpenSecrets. Salary.com. Military Right to Repair Issues Kyle Mizokami. February 11, 2020. Popular Mechanics. Max Finkel. February 8, 2020. Jalopnik. Elle Ekman. November 20, 2019. The New York Times. Lucas Kunce and Elle Ekman. September 15, 2019. Technological Protection Measures (TPMs) Jennifer Zerkee. November 8, 2023. Simon Fraser University. Cyber Risks Sam Curry et al. January 3, 2023. samcurry.net. Apple Lawsuit Brandon Vigliarolo. December 18, 2023. The Register. NDAA Sec. 828 Jason Koebler. August 28, 2024. 404 Media. AdvaMed et al. July 30, 2024. DocumentCloud via 404 Media. Laws Bills Sec. 828 : REQUIREMENT FOR CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCESS TO REPAIR MATERIALS. Fair Repair Act Audio Sources May 16, 2024 Senate Armed Services Committee Witnesses: Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy Clip Sen. Elizabeth Warren: So the Navy acquires everything from night vision goggles to aircraft carriers through contracts with big defense contractors, but the contractors often place restrictions on these deals that prevent service members from maintaining or repairing the equipment, or even let them write a training manual without going back through the contractor. Now the contractors say that since they own the intellectual property and the technical data underlying the equipment, only they have the right to repair that equipment. These right to repair restrictions usually translate into much higher costs for DOD, which has no choice but to shovel money out to big contractors whenever DOD needs to have something fixed. So take the Navy's littoral combat ship, General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin considered much of the data and equipment on the ship to be proprietary, so the Navy had to delay missions and spend millions of dollars on travel costs, just so that contractor affiliated repairmen could fly in, rather than doing this ourselves. Secretary Del Toro, when a sailor isn't allowed to repair part of their ship at sea, and a marine isn't allowed to access technical data to fix a generator on a base abroad. One solution is for the Navy to buy the intellectual property from the contractors. So can you say a little bit about what the benefits are of the Navy having technical rights for the equipment that it has purchased. Sec. Carlos Del Toro: The benefits are enormous, Senator, and we've actually had tremendous success, I'd say, in the last year and a half to two years, through the taxpayer advocacy program that we initiated when I came in. There have been three examples, one, gaining the intellectual property rights for the new ACV class of ships that will replace the AAVs. The F-35 negotiations really proved themselves out in a significant way as well, too. And lastly, the 20 F-18s that the Congress authorized in ‘22 and ‘23, we were able to make significant gains in terms of the government finally getting the intellectual property rights that were necessary for us to be able to properly sustain those moving forward. Sen. Elizabeth Warren: So I am very, very glad to hear this. I like the taxpayer advocacy project and how you're training contract officers to secure technical equipment that the Navy buys, but I think you should have the support of Congress on this. Senator Braun and I have introduced the Stop price gouging the military act to give DoD more tools to get cost and pricing data so that you will be in a better position to negotiate better deals with contractors. There's also more that we can do to ensure that the Navy and the rest of the services have the rights they need to bolster readiness. So let me ask you, Secretary Del Toro, would having a stronger focus on right to repair issues during the acquisition process, like prioritizing contract bids that give DoD fair access to repair materials, and ensuring that contract officers are looking into buying technical rights early on, would that help the Navy save costs and boost readiness at the same time? Sec. Carlos Del Toro: Very much. Senator, in fact, one of the things that we have prioritized since I came in as Secretary of the Navy, given my acquisition background, is actually those negotiations need to happen as early as possible before that we even as we develop the acquisition strategy for that contract to go out to bid, and by doing so, we will reap tremendous returns. July 18, 2023 House Judiciary Committee Witnesses: Aaron Perzanowski, Thomas W. Lacchia Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School , Legal Fellow, Hudson Institute's Forum for Intellectual Property Kyle Wiens, Co-founder and CEO, iFixit Paul Roberts, Founder, SecuRepairs.org; Founder and Editor-in-Chief, the Security Ledger Scott Benavidez, Chairman, Automotive Service Association; Owner, Mr. B's Paint & Body Shop Clips 41:25 Scott Benavidez: My name is Scott Benavidez. I'm the Chairman of the Automotive Service Association's Board of Directors. I am also a second generation shop owner from Albuquerque, New Mexico, Mr. B's Paint and Body Shop. Scott Benavidez: We do have concerns when some insurers insist on repairs that are simply cheaper and quicker, without regard to quality and safety. Repairers understand better than anyone the threat of replacement crash parts or lesser quality. We can and should have a competitive marketplace that doesn't compromise quality or safety, deciding to only cover the cheapest option without understanding implications for quality leaves collision shops and their customers in a tough position. Very few consumers have the knowledge about these types of crash parts used on their vehicles as numerous crash parts in the marketplace, such as OEM (original equipment manufactured) parts, certified aftermarket parts, aftermarket parts, reconditioned crash parts, and recycled crash parts. Repairers can make recommendations, but their customers are unlikely to hear if the insurance won't cover them. 46:45 Paul Roberts: My name is Paul Roberts, and I'm the founder of Secure Repairs. We're an organization of more than 350 cyber security and information technology professionals who support the right to repair. 46:55 Paul Roberts: I'm speaking to you today on behalf of our members to make clear that the fair access to repair materials sought by right to repair laws does not increase cyber risk, and in fact, it can contribute to a healthier and more secure ecosystem of smart and connected devices. Paul Roberts: Proposed right to repair legislation considered by this Congress, such as the Repair Act, or last session, the Fair Repair Act, simply asks manufacturers that already provide repair information and tools to their authorized repair providers to also provide them at a fair and reasonable price to the owners of the devices and to third parties that they may wish to hire to do their work. 47:35 Paul Roberts: By definition, the information covered by right to repair laws is not sensitive or protected, as evidenced by the fact that the manufacturers already distribute it widely to hundreds, thousands, or even tens of thousands of workers for their authorized repair providers. This could be everyone from mechanics working at auto dealerships to the folks staffing the Geek Squad at Best Buy. 48:00 Paul Roberts: Also, we have yet to find any evidence that the types of information covered by right to repair laws like schematic diagrams, service manuals, diagnostic software and replacement parts act as a portal to cyber attacks. The vast majority of attacks on internet connected devices - from broadband routers to home appliances to automobiles - today exploit weaknesses in the embedded software produced and distributed by the manufacturers, or alternatively, weak device configurations so they're deployed on the internet in ways that make them vulnerable to attack. These security weaknesses are an epidemic. A recent study of the security of Internet of Things devices, by the company Phosphorus Labs, or a cybersecurity company, found that 68% of Internet of Things devices contained high risk or critical software vulnerabilities. As an example, I'd like to call attention to the work of a group of independent researchers recently led by Sam Curry, who published a report, and you can Google this, "Web Hackers vs. the Auto Industry" in January 2023. That group disclosed wide ranging and exploitable flaws in vehicle telematics systems from 16 different auto manufacturers. At a leading GPS supplier to major automakers, the researchers claimed to obtain full access to a company-wide administration panel that gave them the ability to send arbitrary commands to an estimated 15.5 million vehicles, including vehicles used by first responders, police, fire and so on. Hacks like this take place without any access to repair materials, nor is there any evidence that providing access to repair software will open the doors to new attacks. 50:05 Paul Roberts: For the last 25 years, Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act has given manufacturers an incentive to deploy software locks widely and to limit access to security researchers. That's kind of a model what we call in cybersecurity, security through obscurity. In other words, by keeping the workings of something secret, you're making it secure. But in fact, that doesn't work, because cyber criminals are very resourceful and they're very determined, and they don't really care what the law says. 50:35 Paul Roberts: Section 1201 has also enabled what one researcher has described as dark patterns in the design and manufacture of hardware that includes everything from locking out customers from access to administrative interfaces, administrative features of the products that they own, as well as practices like part pairing, which Kyle will talk to you more about, in which manufacturers couple replaceable components like screens and sensors and cameras to specific device hardware. Such schemes make manufacturers and their authorized repair providers gatekeepers for repairs, and effectively bar competition from the owners of the devices as well as independent repair providers. 54:45 Kyle Wiens: You think about what is local? What is American? Main Street you have a post office and a repair shop. And unfortunately, we've seen the whittling down of Main Street as the TV repair shops went away when the manufacturers cut off access to schematics, as the camera repair shops went away when Nikon and Canon decided to stop selling them parts. We've seen this systematically across the economy. In the enterprise space, you have Oracle and IBM saying that you can't get security updates to critical cyber infrastructure unless you buy a service contract with them, so they're tying long term service contracts with the security updates that are necessary to keep this infrastructure secure. 56:45 Kyle Wiens: Over the last decade plus, I've been working on Section 1201, trying to get exemptions for the ability to repair products. The challenge that we've had in the section 1201 process every triennial I go back and we ask for permission to be able to fix our own things is that the exemptions we've gotten really only apply to individual consumers. They aren't something that I could use to make a tool to provide to one of you to fix yourself. So in order for someone to take advantage of a 1201 exemption that we have, they have to be a cybersecurity researcher and able to whittle their own tools and use it themselves, and that just doesn't scale. 57:45 Devlin Hartline: My name is Devlin Hartline, and I'm a legal fellow at the Hudson Institute's forum for intellectual property. 57:50 Devlin Hartline: I'd like to start with a question posed by the title of this hearing, is there a right to repair? And the answer is clearly no. A right is a legally enforceable claim against another, but the courts have not recognized that manufacturers have the duty to help consumers make repairs. Instead, the courts have said that while we have the ability to repair our things, we also have the duty not to infringe the IP rights in the process. So it is in fact, the manufacturers who have the relevant rights, not consumers. 58:30 Devlin Hartline: Right to repair supporters want lawmakers to force manufacturers to make the tools, parts, and know-how needed to facilitate repairs available to consumers and independent repair shops. And the assumption here is that anything standing in the way of repair opportunities must necessarily harm the public good, but these tools, parts and know-how, are often protected by IP rights such as copyrights and design patents. And we protect copyrighted works and patented inventions because, as the Constitution recognizes, this promotes the public good. We reward creators and innovators as an incentive for them to bring these things to the marketplace and the public benefits from the introduction of new products and services that increase competition. Thus, the right to repair movement isn't based on a pre-existing right. It's instead asking lawmakers to create a new right at the expense of the existing rights of IP owners. 1:00:45 Devlin Hartline: IP owners are merely exercising their federally protected IP rights, and this is not actionable anti-competitive conduct. It is instead how the IP system is supposed to work. We grant IP owners exclusive rights so they can exclude others, and this, in turn, promotes the investments to create and to commercialize these creative innovations in the marketplace, and that promotes the public good. Aaron Perzanowski: My name is Aaron Perzanowski. I am a professor of law at the University of Michigan, and for the last 15 years, my academic research has focused on the intersection of personal and intellectual property rights in the digital economy. During that time, the right to repair has emerged as a central challenge to the notion that we as consumers control the devices that we buy. Instead consumers, farmers, small businesses, all find that manufacturers exert post-sale control over these devices, often in ways that frustrate repair. Aaron Perzanowski: Repair is as old as humanity. Our Paleolithic ancestors repaired hand axes and other primitive tools, and as our technologies have grown more complex, from the Bronze Age through the Renaissance, to the high tech devices that we all have in our pockets here today, repair has always kept pace. But today, manufacturers are employing a range of strategies that restrict repair, from their hardware and software design choices to clamp downs on secondary markets, and we also troublingly see attempts to leverage IP rights as tools to restrict repair. These efforts are a major departure from the historical treatment of repair under the law, the right to repair is not only consistent with nearly two centuries of IP law in the United States, it reflects half a millennium of common law property doctrine that rejects post-sale restrictions on personal property as early as the 15th century. English property law recognized that once a property owner sells an item, efforts to restrain how the new owner of that item can use it are inconsistent with the essential nature of private property and obnoxious to public policy. As the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized, IP laws' respect for the property interests of purchasers of copyrighted and patented goods was profoundly shaped by this common law tradition. In 1850, the Supreme Court recognized that the repair of a patented machine reflected "no more than the exercise of that right of care, which everyone may use to give duration to that which he owns." A century later, the Court held that the repair of a convertible car roof was justified as an exercise of "the lawful right of the property owner to repair his property." And just a few years ago, the court reaffirmed the rejection of post-sale restrictions under patent law in Impression Products vs. Lexmark, a case about refurbishing printer ink cartridges. Copyright law, not surprisingly, has had fewer occasions to consider repair restrictions. But as early as 1901, the Seventh Circuit recognized "a right of repair or renewal under US copyright law." When a publisher sued to prevent a used book dealer from repairing and replacing damaged components of books, the court said that "the right of ownership in the book carries with it and includes the right to maintain the book as nearly as possible in its original condition." A century after that, Congress itself acknowledged repair as a right that owners enjoy, regardless of copyright restrictions, when it enacted section 117 C of the Copyright Act. That provision was designed to undo a Ninth Circuit decision that allowed copyright holders to prevent third party repairs of computers. Section 117 C explicitly permits owners of machines to make copies of computer programs in the course of maintenance or repair. And finally, the US Copyright Office over the last decade has repeatedly concluded that diagnosis, repair, and maintenance activities are non-infringing when it comes to vehicles, consumer devices, and medical equipment. So the right to repair is firmly rooted in basic principles of US IP law. Aaron Perzanowski: Section 1201 of the DMCA makes it practically impossible for consumers to exercise their lawful right to repair a wide range of devices, from tractors to home electronics, even though the copyright office says those activities are not infringing, and the weakening of standards for design patents allow firms to choke off the supply of replacement parts needed to repair vehicles, home appliances, and other devices. Aaron Perzanowski: One way to think about a right is as an affirmative power to force someone else to engage in some behavior, and in some cases, that is what we're talking about. We're talking about imposing, especially on the state level, regulations that impose requirements on manufacturers. I think that's true of the Repair Act on the federal level as well. But, I think part of what we also need to keep in mind is that sometimes what you need to effectuate a right is to eliminate barriers that stand in the way of that right. So we can think about this, I think, helpfully in the context of tools that enable people to engage in repair. The state level solution has been to require manufacturers to give their own tools to repair shops, sometimes compensated under fair and reasonable terms. The other solution would be to change section 1201 to say, let's allow independent repair shops to make their own tools. I think both of those solutions have some value to them. I also think it's really important to keep in mind that when we're talking about IP rights, there are always multiple sets of interests at stake, and one of the key balances that IP law has always tried to strike is the balance between the limited statutory exclusive rights that the Patent and Copyright Acts create and the personal property rights of consumers who own these devices. And so I think a balancing is absolutely necessary and appropriate. 1:15:20 Aaron Perzanowski: I think the best solution for Section 1201 is embodied in a piece of legislation that Representatives Jones and Spartz introduced in the last Congress, which would create a permanent exception to Section 1201 for repair that would apply not only to the act of circumvention, but would also apply to the creation and distribution of tools that are useful for repair purposes that does not open the door to broad, unrestrained, creation of circumvention tools, but tools that are that are targeted to the repair market. 1:16:40 Devlin Hartline: He cited a case about where you can repair a cover on a book. That's very different than recreating the book, every single word in it, right? So there's a difference between repairing something and then crossing the line into violating the exclusive rights of IP owners in the patented product or the copyrighted book. And so the things that repair supporters are asking for is that, if somebody has a design patent that covers an auto body part, well, they have the right to exclude other people from making that part, but repair supporters say they shouldn't have that exclusive right, because, you know, we could increase competition if we just took away their design patent and now other people could make that part, and so that's competition. But that's not the type of competition that IP law and competition law seek to support. That's like saying, if we just let the Pirate Bay copy and distribute all of the Disney blockbuster movies, then that's competition, and prices would go down. But that's not the way that we do it, right? So competition means other people come up with new products and new services, and so that's what we should be trying to support. 1:26:45 Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY): Repair advocates argue that section 1201, prevents non-infringing circumvention of access controls for purposes. But Congress contemplated this use when it passed the DMCA in 1998, allowing for a triennial exemption process. Is the exemption process working as intended? And if not, are there actions Congress can take to expand exemptions or make them easier to acquire? Devlin Hartline: What's important about the triennial rulemaking is that the proponent of an exemption has to come forward with evidence and demonstrate that there's actually a problem and it relates to a certain class of works, and then they can get a temporary exemption for three years. And so it is true that the Librarian of Congress, the last few rulemakings, has said that because using a copyrighted work in a way for repair, maintenance, etc, is Fair Use that they grant these exemptions. But these exemptions are quite narrow. They do not allow the trafficking of the computer programs that can crack the TPMs. And so it's very narrowly done. And the concern is that if you were to create a permanent exemption that opens things all the way up with access controls, copy controls and trafficking thereof, is now you're getting to the point of why we even have these TPMs under 1201 in the first place, and that's because they guard against piracy. And so the concern is that you're opening the piracy floodgates. You make these devices less secure, and then content owners are going to be less likely to want to put their content on these devices. Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA): How does section 1201 of the DMCA impact the ability of consumers and independent repair shops to modify or repair devices that have proprietary software and data in the consumer electronics industry? Aaron Perzanowski: Thank you so much for the question. As we've been talking about the copyright office in 2015, 2018, 2021, and they're in the process for the current rulemaking, has determined that engaging in circumvention, the removal or bypassing of these digital locks for purposes of repair, is perfectly lawful behavior, but there is a major practical mismatch here between the legal rights that consumers enjoy under federal law today and their practical ability to exercise those rights. And that's because, as Devlin was just describing, the section 1201 rulemaking does not extend to the creation or distribution of tools, right? So I have the right under federal law, to remove the technological lock, say, on my video game console, if I want to swap out a broken disk drive. How do I do that? I'd like to think of myself as a pretty technologically sophisticated person. I don't have the first clue about how to do that. I need a person who can write that code, make that code available to consumers so that I can. All I'm trying to do is swap out a broken disk drive on my video game. But you would argue that code is proprietary, correct? So I'm talking here about a third party making their own code that is simply allowing me to engage in activity that the Copyright Office has repeatedly said is non-infringing. Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA): So you want to give them a map. Is that, essentially, what you're saying? Aaron Perzanowski: Absolutely, yes, I do. Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA): Do trade secrets play a role in the right to repair debate? Aaron Perzanowski: There are occasions where trade secrets are important. I don't think in the context that we're talking about here with section 1201, that we're typically running into trade secret issues. The state-level bills that have been introduced do typically address trade secrets and often have carve outs there. And I think that's something worth considering in this debate. But I think it's important to keep in mind that just because we have some hypothetical worry about some unknown bad actor taking a tool that I use to fix my video game console -- Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA): It's not unknown. The Chinese do it all the time. Aaron Perzanowski: I don't think the Chinese are particularly worried about whether or not I can fix my video game console, and in fact, I think that point is important, but the bad actors already have these tools. All we're trying to do is get very targeted tools in the hands of law abiding citizens who just want to repair the stuff they buy for their kids for Christmas, right? If the Chinese are going to hack the PlayStation, they've already done it. 1:32:25 Aaron Perzanowski: So the 1201 process is what established the legality of circumvention for repair purposes. But when Congress created that rulemaking authority, it only extends to the act of circumvention, the actual removal. Congress did not give the [Copyright] Office or the Librarian [of Congress] the authority to grant exemptions to the trafficking provisions, and that's where I think legislative intervention is really important. 1:39:00 Kyle Wiens: One of the challenges was section 1201. It doesn't just ban repair tools, it also bans the distribution of cybersecurity tools. And so we've seen security researchers....Apple sued a company that made a security research tool under 1201 and that tool has markedly made the world more secure. It's very popular amongst government security researchers. So I think that's kind of the sweet spot is, allow some third party inspection. It'll make the product better. 1:41:25 Kyle Wiens: These ice cream machines are made by Taylor, and there is an incredibly complex, baroque set of touchscreens you have to go through. And then there's a service password you have to be able to get past in order to access the settings that really allow you to do what you want. And so, in an ideal world, you'd have an entrepreneur who would come along and make a tool to make it easier for McDonald's, maybe they could have an app on their phone that they could use to configure and help them diagnose and repair the machine. Unfortunately, the company who made that tool is struggling legally because of all these challenges across the board. If we had innovation outside of the manufacturers and to be able to develop new tools for fixing ice cream machines or anything else, you have a whole flowering ecosystem of repair tools right now. It doesn't exist. The US is like this black hole where innovation is banned in software repair. There's all kinds of opportunities I could see, I had a farmer ask me for help fixing his John Deere tractor, and I had to say, I can't do that particular repair because it's illegal. I'd love to build a cool app for helping him diagnose and fix his tractor and get back back in the field faster. We don't have that marketplace right now. It's like farmers have been forced to, like, use cracked Ukrainian versions of John Deere diagnostic software, right? Rep. Russell Fry (R-SC): So it's not just ice cream machines. I led off with that, but it's farmers, it's farm equipment, it's iPhones, it's somebody's Xbox, right? I mean, these are all things.... in your experience, what are the challenges that these customers and stakeholders face when they're trying to repair their own devices? What are some things that they face? Kyle Wiens: It's absolutely infuriating. So my friend, farmer in San Luis Obispo, Dave grows all kinds of amazing products. He has a $300,000 John Deere tractor, came to me and said, Hey, there's a bad sensor. It's going to take a week to get that sensor sent out from Indiana, and I need to use the tractor in that time. Will you help me bypass the sensor? I could hypothetically modify the software in the tractor to do that. Practically, I didn't have the legal ability, and so he had to go and rent an expensive tractor for the week. This is impacting people's lives every single day. 1:43:50 Rep. Russell Fry (R-SC): So, to pivot a little bit, what role do you see from a federal side, from legislation, and what specific measures do you think might be included in such legislation? Kyle Wiens: So we've seen the solutions being approached from two angles. At the state level, you have states saying John Deere and other manufacturers, if you have a dealership that has fancy tools, sell those tools to consumers and to independent shops, allow that competition. At the federal level, what we can do is enable a competitive marketplace for those tools. So rather than compelling John Deere to sell the tool, we can say, hey, it's legal for someone, an entrepreneur, to make a competing tool. And you have this in the car market. You can take your car down the AutoZone, you can buy a scan tool, plug it into your car, and it'll decode some of the error messages. Those tools exist on the auto market because we have a standard diagnostic interface on cars that you can access without circumventing a TPM. We don't have that for any other products. So another farmer in my town, he showed me how if he has a transmission go out on a truck, he can fix that. But if he has a transmission go out on his John Deere tractor, he can't. He can physically install the transmission, but he can't program it to make it work. I'd love to be able to make a software tool to enable him to replace his transmission. Aaron Perzanowski: So I think if we see passage of the SMART Act, we can anticipate significant reductions in the expenses associated with auto collision repairs. Estimates are that design patents on collision parts are responsible for about $1.5 billion in additional expenditures. We see price premiums on OEM parts over third party parts often reaching into like the 40% range, right? So these are pretty significant cost savings associated with that. Part of this problem, I think, does relate back to the kind of unique structure of this market. Most consumers are not paying out of pocket for collision repairs. Those costs are being covered by their auto insurance provider, and so the consumer doesn't see that the - I'm pulling this from memory, so don't hold me to this figure - but the side view mirror of a Ford Fiesta costing $1,500, that's not something that the consumer is confronted with, right? So this goes back to the question of notice. Do consumers know when they buy that vehicle that the repairs are going to be that expensive? I think in most cases, they don't. And so I think the SMART Act is a very targeted solution to this problem. I do think it's important to note that the design patent issue for replacement parts is not limited to the automotive industry. I think it's the most, I think that's the area where the problem is most pressing. But home appliances, consumer electronics, we see companies getting design patents on replacement water filters for refrigerators so that they can charge three times as much when the little light comes on on your fridge to tell you that your water might not be as clean as you want it to be. So I think we have to think about that problem across a range of industries, but the automotive industry, I think, is absolutely the right place to start. Paul Roberts: I mean, one point I would just make is that with the Internet of Things, right, we are facing a crisis in the very near future as manufacturers of everything from home appliances to personal electronics to equipment, as those products age and those manufacturers walk away from their responsibility to maintain them. So we're no longer supporting the software. We're no longer issuing security updates. Who will step in to maintain those devices? Keep them secure, keep them operating right? The manufacturers walked away. Do we just get rid of them? No, because the equipment still works perfectly. We're going to need a market-based response to that. We're going to need small businesses to step up and say, hey, I'll keep that Samsung dishwasher working for another 20 years. That's a huge economic opportunity for this country, but we cannot do it in the existing system because of the types of restrictions that we're talking about. And so this is really about enabling a secure future in which, when you buy a dishwasher with a 20 year lifespan, or 25 year lifespan, it's going to last that 25 years, not the five to six years that the manufacturer has decided, you know, that's how long we want to support the software for. Paul Roberts: My understanding is the use of design patents has increased dramatically, even exponentially, in the last 10 to 15 years. If you go back to the 90s or 80s, you know, parts makers, automakers were not applying these types of patents to replaceable parts like bumpers and rear view mirrors. Somebody had a business decision that, if you can do so, then we can capture more of that aftermarket by outlawing identical aftermarket replacements that has a huge downstream impact on car owners and on insurers and on all of us. 2:10:15 Paul Roberts: Both of the things that we're really proposing or talking about here, which would be changes to Section 1201 of the DMCA as well as passage of robust right to repair laws, would empower a market-based response to keeping the internet of things working, secure and functioning. DMCA 1201 reforms by making it clear that you can circumvent software locks for the purpose of repair and maintenance and upkeep, right? So that would take the threat of the federal crime away from small business owners as well as security researchers who are interested in, you know, plumbing that software for purposes of maintenance, upkeep and repair. And on the right to repair by making the tools available to maintain and upkeep products - diagnostic software, schematic diagrams, service manuals - available. Once again, you'll be empowering small business owners to set up repair shops and say, I'm going to keep your smart appliance running for its full 25 or 30 year lifespan, and I'm going to support my family doing that locally, and not be basically choked out of business by a company that says, Well, you don't have the right to access this product. From a cybersecurity perspective, that is really important, because one thing we don't want is a population of millions or tens of millions of out of date, unsupported, unpatched, insecure internet connected home appliances, webcams, home routers out there available to nation state actors, cyber criminal groups, to compromise and use for their own purposes. And that's something we already see, particularly around broadband routers and other types of devices, and it's a real threat going forward that I think this type of these types of changes would support. Aaron Perzanowski In a lot of instances, this conversation, and we've touched on this earlier, focuses on cost savings, right? And cost savings are an important consideration, right? Farmers aren't thrilled that they have to pay a technician from the John Deere dealer to drive maybe hours to get to their farm and connect their laptop and, you know, download these payload files to enable their equipment to work. But in the agricultural space, the thing I hear most often in the conversations I have with farmers is and Kyle touched on this a bit earlier, is a real concern about the time sensitivity of their work. If your tractor is out of commission for a week or two in the wrong part of the season, that is going to have disastrous effects, right, not only on that farm's economic outlook, but collectively, it can have an impact like, not to be hyperbolic here, but on our national food supply, and so I think it's really important that farmers have flexibility in terms of where and how they execute repairs, so that they can get their equipment back up and running. If my laptop breaks and I can't get it fixed for a week or two, I'm annoyed there will be emails that go unanswered, but like the world will continue to spin. That is not the case in the agricultural space where we, I think, have to be much more concerned. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA): If I remove from my BMW, at least during certain models, I remove the radio, unplug it, and then plug it back in, simply because I was fiddling around with the dash, I now have to go back to the dealer to reinstall it. Similarly, the transmission example. I've got two John Deere tractors. One's got a busted engine, the other's got a busted transmission. Currently, they will prohibit you from moving the transmission from one to the other. From a standpoint of intellectual property, where, in God's green earth or the Constitution, are any of those designed to be rights that belong to the manufacturer, rather than rights that belong to the owners of those two John Deere tractors? Devlin Hartline: So those are a bunch of different situations, and so I think there would be underlying facts that differ with each right. So we started on the iPhone, and I was going to point out that iPhone will actually give you the tool to synchronize it. In those other situations, I don't know the business justification for it. How is that an IP problem? Right? So if that's locked up with the TPM, and you have to bypass the TPM, well then that's a violation of 1201, so that's how they can that's how they can lock -- Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA): So what you're saying is that Congress has created impediments to the right to repair. Mr. Roberts, would you say that is correct? That, in fact, the right to repair, were Congress never to have done anything since, you know, George and Thomas were our presidents, so to speak, knowing those two presidents, we'd be able to do things we're not able to do because they're now prohibited by acts of Congress. Paul Roberts: Yes, and we certainly know going back to the 50s, 60s, 70s, there was a much more you know....First of all, companies would ship products with service and repair manuals with detailed schematic diagrams with the understanding that owners would want to replace and service them. And what I would say is, yes, absolutely. I doubt very much. And I know we had members who were here in 1998 authoring the DMCA. I think if you had said to them, in 25 years time, this law will be used to prevent somebody with a broken dishwasher from getting that serviced by their local repair shop or by for fixing it themselves, this law will prevent them from doing that, I doubt very much they would have said, yeah, that's pretty much what we want. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA): Well, I will tell you that the I was the chairman of what is now the Consumer Electronics Association in 1998 and we did predict a lot of these items were going to be expanded beyond the scope of the original. Paul Roberts: Right now this is not an urgent issue, because most of the cars out there are older vehicles. As we move forward, as telematic systems evolve, as automakers continue their trend of moving more and more information to telematic systems, this is going to become a bigger problem. I'll point out another problem, which is the Massachusetts law is contingent on data transfers of diagnostic and repair information via the OBD or onboard diagnostic two port under the dashboard. That's only there because of federal Clean Air law. Electronic vehicles don't have that port because they don't have emissions, and so in the very near future, as we shift to electronic vehicles, that data access port will no longer be there. It will all be telematics data, and so the utility of the Massachusetts law is going to decline over time, going forward. And again, I you know, when you start talking about right to repair, you become like this crazy person who talks about right to repair every time it comes up. But one thing I try and stress to people when I talk to them about auto repair is, if you live in Michigan or California and you have taken your vehicle to the local independent repair shop, you have only done that because the voters in Massachusetts passed a ballot measure over a decade ago and then updated it in November 2020. That is the very thin thread that our right to use independent auto repair hangs by in this country. That's not the way it's supposed to be. This is something that affects vehicle owners, hundreds of millions of them in all 50 states. And it's a type of thing that the federal government needs to address with federal legislation. It should not hang by this very thin thread. 2:30:20 Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA): Are software updates new creations, and thus copyrightable? Devlin Hartline: Software updates, yeah, they're computer programs, and so Congress said explicitly in 1980, but it was understood before then, that computer programs are literary works and they're protected, just like any other copyrighted work. Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA): Thank you, Professor Perzanowski, do you disagree? Aaron Perzanowski: I don't disagree at all that software updates are protectable subject matter under the Copyright Act. But what I think is important to keep in mind right is the Copyright Act and copyrights exclusive rights, and all of the exceptions and limitations to copyrights exclusive rights are created by Congress, and so if you think those rights are interfering with other important issues and concerns, then I think Congress clearly has the power to make changes to the copyright law in order to best serve what you ultimately determine to be in the public interest. 2:35:30 Aaron Perzanowski: Access to firmware and other code is really essential to the functioning and repair of lots of devices. I think there's some important differences between the standard essential patent context and kind of what we're talking about here in that in the standard essential patent context, we're relying on standard setting bodies to identify technologies and to require companies to license their patents under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms. We don't quite have that infrastructure in place in the copyright context, but what we do have are compulsory licenses that exist within the Copyright Act already, one of which you were alluding to earlier, the mechanical license for musical works. We also have compulsory licenses for retransmissions of satellite and broadcast content that essentially say the copyright owner is entitled to compensation of some form, but they're not entitled to prevent people from using or accessing that underlying work, and I think that could be a useful framework here for getting owners of devices access to the firmware that they need. Music by Editing Production Assistance

In this episode, Braxton Critcher is joined by Dwayne Myers to discuss the importance of the Repair Act in the automotive industry. Dwayne highlights how advancements in automotive technology could potentially lock out independent repair shops, stressing the need for security measures that allow fair access to repair data. Braxton and Dwayne delve into the consumer implications, including the potential lack of repair options and increased costs if the Repair Act is not passed. 00:00 Car advancements: Enhanced security restricts consumer access.05:54 Manufacturers sell collected data; we want repair data.08:52 Inflation affects prices; manufacturer network access control.12:09 Public supports, but compliance and rulings vary.13:18 Seeking balance in necessary legislation oversight.17:34 Actionable systems implementation: "Couple years" to establish precedent.20:04 Your input makes a significant difference.Write your congressperson about the Repair Act! Learn more about how Shop Controller can make your shop more efficient HERE

In this episode, Braxton Critcher delves into pressing topics in the automotive world. He highlights the significant push from the Auto Care Association for the Repair Act, encouraging listeners to contact their congresspersons to protect their rights in vehicle repairs. Braxton also covers BMW's ambitious plans to introduce hydrogen-powered vehicles by 2028, which aim to expand the existing infrastructure alongside Toyota. Additionally, he discusses the recent leadership changes within the automotive aftermarket charitable foundation, marking a new chapter for the organization. 00:00 New podcast series on the Repair Act.03:27 Contact congressperson; attend Right to Repair summit.08:50 Ford patent may impact data sharing and future technology.09:56 Please like, share, subscribe, and follow us.Write your congressperson about the Repair Act! Thanks to our sponsor AutoFix Auto Shop Coaching! Schedule your free strategy session here: autofixautoshopcoaching.com

In this episode, Braxton Critcher is joined by Cavan Robinson and Mike Allen. Braxton covers California's zero-emission mandate and the Specialty Equipment Market Association's response. Cavan discusses his plans for the future of Shop-Ware as the new General Manager. Mike shares valuable advice for first-time attendees of industry training events, emphasizing the benefits of actionable insights.  Thanks to our sponsor AutoFix Auto Shop Coaching! Schedule your free strategy session here: autofixautoshopcoaching.com

The Auto Care Association (ACA) CEO Bill Hanvey urges the industry to push Congress to advance the stalled Repair Act, and Braxton emphasizes the importance of using the provided link to contact representatives. Additionally, CarShield reaches a $10 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over misleading advertising allegations, prompting the company to provide clearer information on covered repairs. Finally, Jay Kuykendall, an automotive instructor from Portland Community College, is named the 2024 Mitchell 1 Educator of the Year for his exceptional contributions to automotive education. Help the Repair Act get moving again! Thanks to our sponsor AutoFix Auto Shop Coaching! Schedule your free strategy session here: autofixautoshopcoaching.com

In this episode, Braxton Critcher dives into recent findings by the IIHS and HLDI, revealing that partial automation systems in vehicles do not significantly prevent collisions. Chris Messer joins Braxton to preview the Ratchet and Wrench Management Conference's new format, emphasizing its focus on peer-to-peer learning from shop owners and operators. Braxton also highlights a study from Harvard, which found that nearly 20% of existing EV chargers are broken or disabled, posing a significant challenge to the growing EV market. Register for the Ratchet and Wrench Management Conference here: https://www.rwconference.com/ Thanks to our sponsor AutoFix Auto Shop Coaching! Schedule your free strategy session here: autofixautoshopcoaching.com

Want to add strategic pricing to your marketing tool box? Go to InteliChek or call 877-827-7273 and ask about our InteliShare Series!   InteliShare  contains all of our promotional tools that you can use to promote your favorable prices, including our InteliAds, the printable flyers that you can show off in easel displays, InteliMedia, for your Digital Media Boards AND InteliWidgets, so you can show off price comparisons on your website and even let your customers schedule from the widget.     Summary In this episode, Brandon, Ed, and Tom discuss the Right to Repair Act and its implications for dealerships. They explore the key provisions of the act, including the requirement for manufacturers to provide specifications to third parties and the disclosure of vehicle information captured in telematics.   The conversation also touches on the potential impact on warranties, patents, and personal data. The hosts debate the need for regulation in the automotive industry and the balance between consumer choice and intellectual property rights. They also discuss the history and future of the repair act and its potential effects on the industry. The conversation discusses the impact of proposed legislation on the use of aftermarket parts in vehicle repairs.   The speakers explore the history of aftermarket parts, the role of certifications, and the potential consequences of the legislation. They also touch on the influence of insurance companies and the importance of educating customers about their repair options. The conversation concludes with a discussion on data privacy and the need for consumers to be informed and make their own decisions.   Takeaways The Right to Repair Act is an attempt by Congress to level the playing field between dealerships and manufacturers, but it may put dealers and manufacturers at a disadvantage. The act requires manufacturers to provide specifications to third parties and disclose all vehicle information captured in telematics, which raises concerns about intellectual property rights and personal data privacy. Dealerships are already heavily regulated, and the act adds another layer of complexity and cost, potentially driving up prices for consumers. The act may lead to more subscription services and increased prices for vehicles, as manufacturers find alternative ways to recoup costs. The future of the repair act is uncertain, with different states passing their own legislation and the potential for changes depending on the political landscape. The quality of aftermarket parts has improved over time, and they can be a cost-effective alternative to OEM parts. The proposed legislation would require OEMs to share their patents and information with aftermarket manufacturers, potentially impacting competition and innovation. Insurance companies may prefer the use of aftermarket parts to keep costs down, but customers should be educated about their repair options. Data privacy is a concern, and consumers should have the choice to share their vehicle data or not.   Clips: Mass Law 2012 2014 Agreement (National Standard) 2020 Ballot Measure 2023 Neal Dunn 2023 Darryl Issa-SMART ACT NHTSA-Do Not Comply NHTSA-Reverse Course   Music: Wild Wonder-The Last Reveille-Night Visions Lone Canyon-Another Moment Quiet Lake-Into The Abyss Alsever Lake-Shine Your Light   Guests: Tom Kline-Better Vantage Point Ed Roberts-Mile One Leadership

Want to add strategic pricing to your marketing tool box? Go to InteliChek or call 877-827-7273 and ask about our InteliShare Series!   InteliShare  contains all of our promotional tools that you can use to promote your favorable prices, including our InteliAds, the printable flyers that you can show off in easel displays, InteliMedia, for your Digital Media Boards AND InteliWidgets, so you can show off price comparisons on your website and even let your customers schedule from the widget.     Summary In this episode, Brandon, Ed, and Tom discuss the Right to Repair Act and its implications for dealerships. They explore the key provisions of the act, including the requirement for manufacturers to provide specifications to third parties and the disclosure of vehicle information captured in telematics. The conversation also touches on the potential impact on warranties, patents, and personal data. The hosts debate the need for regulation in the automotive industry and the balance between consumer choice and intellectual property rights. They also discuss the history and future of the repair act and its potential effects on the industry. The conversation discusses the impact of proposed legislation on the use of aftermarket parts in vehicle repairs. The speakers explore the history of aftermarket parts, the role of certifications, and the potential consequences of the legislation. They also touch on the influence of insurance companies and the importance of educating customers about their repair options. The conversation concludes with a discussion on data privacy and the need for consumers to be informed and make their own decisions.   Takeaways The Right to Repair Act is an attempt by Congress to level the playing field between dealerships and manufacturers, but it may put dealers and manufacturers at a disadvantage. The act requires manufacturers to provide specifications to third parties and disclose all vehicle information captured in telematics, which raises concerns about intellectual property rights and personal data privacy. Dealerships are already heavily regulated, and the act adds another layer of complexity and cost, potentially driving up prices for consumers. The act may lead to more subscription services and increased prices for vehicles, as manufacturers find alternative ways to recoup costs. The future of the repair act is uncertain, with different states passing their own legislation and the potential for changes depending on the political landscape. The quality of aftermarket parts has improved over time, and they can be a cost-effective alternative to OEM parts. The proposed legislation would require OEMs to share their patents and information with aftermarket manufacturers, potentially impacting competition and innovation. Insurance companies may prefer the use of aftermarket parts to keep costs down, but customers should be educated about their repair options. Data privacy is a concern, and consumers should have the choice to share their vehicle data or not.   Clips: Mass Law 2012 2014 Agreement (National Standard) 2020 Ballot Measure 2023 Neal Dunn 2023 Darryl Issa-SMART ACT NHTSA-Do Not Comply NHTSA-Reverse Course   Music: Wild Wonder-The Last Reveille-Night Visions Lone Canyon-Another Moment Quiet Lake-Into The Abyss Alsever Lake-Shine Your Light   Guests: Tom Kline-Better Vantage Point Ed Roberts-Mile One Leadership

In this episode, hear the latest news around the automotive repair industry on things like Right to Repair, a dispute between automakers and the NHTSA, Florida's unwillingness to install more EV charging stations, and more! Send Braxton an email and let him know your thoughts about the show: braxton@automotiverepairnews.com Thanks to our sponsor AutoFix Auto Shop Coaching! Schedule your free strategy session here: autofixautoshopcoaching.com

In this episode, Braxton Critcher and Lisa Foshee, from the Auto Care Association, discuss the importance of Right to Repair. Lisa provides a detailed update on HR 906, the Repair Act, highlighting its bipartisan support and its importance for both consumers and independent repair shops. Lisa also covers the potential limitations on consumers' repair choices without the act, emphasizing the need for independent shops to access necessary repair data. 00:00 Bipartisan support for the bill ensures consumer rights.03:38 Cars now transmit data wirelessly to manufacturers.08:26 Auto Care Association helps represent and support.

Episode Notes: Can Trade Schools & Technical Programs truly be the gateway to success in the automotive aftermarket?If you had any doubts, I think after this episode you will agree… the answer is YES!This week, I'll share the journey of my guest Colby McLaughlin, from a student in a middle-college Autobody Repair Program to a leading figure in the automotive aftermarket. Buckle up as we ride shotgun through Colby's fast-paced career, navigating the twists and turns from hands-on custom car building to the helm of Trim Illusion and the Professional Restylers Organization (PRO) Board.  This high-octane episode isn't just about cool rides and chrome—it's a celebration of craftsmanship, dedication, and the drive to succeed. Check out the transformation of raw talent into industry leadership, and how mentorship can turbocharge a career from the garage floor to the executive suite. Colby's story serves up not just inspiration, but also practical wisdom for anyone looking to accelerate their own career trajectory in the automotive world.  Finally, we pop the hood on SEMA's vital role in advocating for the automotive aftermarket industry, diving into the nitty-gritty of legislation and the Right to Repair Act. It's a candid look at the challenges and victories in protecting our liberty to tinker and tailor our vehicles. Whether you're a trade school student with grease under your nails or a seasoned pro looking to reconnect with your roots, this conversation will fuel your passion and maybe even spark your support for your local tech school programs. Guest Info: Colby McLaughlin – https://www.linkedin.com/in/colby-mclaughlin/Trim Illusion – https://www.trimillusion.com/Company Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TrimIllusionWashtenaw Community College - https://catalog.wccnet.edu/current/courses/abr.phpCustom Cars & Concepts Program at WCC - https://catalog.wccnet.edu/current/courses/ccc.phpInfo links: Link to SEMA site to help:  https://www.semasan.com/Link to Economic Output Report:  Support the showJoin our Mind Wrench mailing list!

Dive into the heart of the Right to Repair movement with our latest discussion on Oregon's groundbreaking legislation, Apple's unexpected endorsement, and the broader implications for consumers, the environment, and local economies. Discover the balancing act between advancing consumer rights and addressing manufacturers' concerns, from intellectual property to safety and innovation. Unveil the multifaceted arguments shaping the future of our digital world, with insights from macrumors.com, Engadget, TechXlore, Built In, and PIRG. 00:00 Welcome to the Daily Decrypt: Exploring Right to Repair 00:49 The Rise of Right to Repair Legislation 02:19 Apple's Repair Monopoly and Its Impact 03:25 The Environmental Toll of Planned Obsolescence 10:07 Navigating the World of E-Waste Recycling 13:48 The Business of Recycling: A Closer Look 18:50 Security Concerns in the Right to Repair Movement 22:44 Looking Ahead: The Future of Right to Repair 26:34 Wrapping Up: The Importance of Supporting Right to Repair Tags: Right to Repair, Oregon legislation, consumer rights, environmental sustainability, electronic waste, Apple, repairability, local economies, tech industry, consumer empowerment Search Phrases: Oregon Right to Repair law details How does Right to Repair affect consumer rights? Environmental benefits of Right to Repair Apple's stance on Right to Repair Impact of Right to Repair on local businesses Right to Repair and electronic waste reduction Latest Right to Repair legislation updates Right to Repair movement and tech industry Consumer empowerment through Right to Repair Understanding Oregon's Right to Repair bill Transcript: Right to Repair offsetkeyz: Welcome back to the Daily Decrypt. Today we're joined by the Trash Queen, the Solid Waste Savant, Hot Girl Farmer. As we discuss the right to repair movement and planned hgf: obsolescence, offsetkeyz: planned obsolescence, and it's impact not only on tech and small businesses but also on the environment itself. Hot Girl Farmer. Spends a lot of her time working with landfills and trash and solid waste and really knows the impact that it has on the environment. hgf: This is one of our favorite topics as the intersection between environmental sustainability efforts and tech, and Apple's one of the biggest offenders with this problem of e waste. offsetkeyz: So to kick things off, in the last week of March of 2024, Oregon passed a right to repair bill, which is the first of its kind because it prohibits hardware and software pairing, which basically means that the software on a device can't require very specific pieces of hardware. It must now allow for similar components and not be that restrictive in order to allow for devices to be repaired and ultimately their lifespan. hgf: Organ offsetkeyz: has joined states like California, New York, Colorado, and Minnesota hgf: Making a offsetkeyz: notable shift in consumer protection laws, California's Right to Repair Act signed into law by Governor Newsom stands out for its strength and potential impact aiming to expand consumers and independent repair shops access to materials and information needed for repairing electronics and appliances. California's law is set to take effect in July of 2024 where Oregon's that was just passed a couple weeks ago is set to take effect at the beginning of 2025. So new devices created after I think January 1st of 2025 will now be required to allow third party hardware and not be blocked by software locks. The law also requires manufacturers to provide maintenance guides so that user of the devices can maintain them themselves, as well as parts for sale. So this whole bill is kind of aimed around Apple because they're notorious for being the only providers of repairs for their products. You can't go to a third party manufacturer. business and get your iPhone repaired or your MacBook. You're lucky if you can put new sticks of RAM in your MacBook. So this limits the opportunity for small businesses to pop up as iPhone repair stores or anything along those lines, which stifles our economy and sort of creates a monopoly for Apple. It also really shortens the lifespan of these devices. For example, if your screen cracks, you must now take it to Apple. to get a new screen and they can charge whatever they want. And that might cost as much as a new iPhone. So you're going to end up taking your cracked iPhone and selling it on Facebook marketplace for 50 bucks or just throwing it in the trash and going and getting a new iPhone. And that is maybe convenient if you have the means, but it's really bad for our environment. hgf: Yeah, e waste has been a huge problem and we're talking about it more and seeing more of the data in recent years. But yeah, basically, if it's as expensive to repair an iPhone as to get a new one, why would anyone get it fixed? They really create this model of, with the new upgrades every year, and the way that the product kind of degrades, like the battery gets worse pretty quickly. Basically these products are clearly designed to be tossed every couple years. offsetkeyz: It's honestly in Apple's best interest if the consumer throws away the iPhone every two years because then they buy a new one every two years. If, if anyone can repair their iPhone or MacBook, that's less iPhones and MacBooks being sold. So, Apple has been on board with previous right to repair movements, like the one in California they fully supported, but this Oregon one is much more restrictive. Like we had mentioned, it's the first one that. definitely understand wanting control of your product, to control the consumer experience and not wanting that to be modified by a third party And I think that's part of the reason why Apple's brand is so popular hgf: in the U. S. and is like, artistically offsetkeyz: Very true I personally was an android user up until 2016 I think I like the customizability of Android where you can change everything. The icons, you can do whatever. But for about four years, my Androids were dying every nine months. Like I couldn't get him a hold of charge forever. And all my iPhone friends. iPhones would hold a charge for multiple years, so I was like, okay, heck, let's go for it. Then I got into cybersecurity, and whether or not it's real or fake, they felt like they valued privacy and security as a company. And of the reasons is that they control the manufacturing from the top down. They control the making of the chips, they do all of it. They make the screens, they make the body, they make the software to work specifically with their hardware. And only recently has that gotten a little out of control to where they pair your operating system with the hardware in your specific device. So if you had a friend with the exact same iPhone model, you couldn't swap any components between the two phones because your phone literally would stop working. It wouldn't work anymore because it's paired with the software, which is kind of ingenious to maintain that control. But I Feel a little conflicted about the right to repair. I like that Apple maintains control from top to bottom. That way I know nothing's being manipulated with. You know, none of the parts are coming from A random warehouse in China that hasn't been certified by Apple. That way they're able to control the specific updates, hardware and software, and there's a lot of security features that I really like about that process, but hgf: Yeah, me too. offsetkeyz: it is becoming more and more apparent that there are ways to maintain security while also increasing the lifespan of these devices and allowing for third parties to repair. hgf: I don't know much about, like, the Apple Store experience. I've maybe been in twice, honestly. I think I get a lot of my products online, but likely is staff to prepare your device? Like, do they have technicians in there that can repair your phone? offsetkeyz: That's a good point, which I was shocked to find out while doing research for this, that one of Apple's main Profits is from offering insurance on their devices. And since they're the only people that can maintain devices, they can charge whatever they want. So it's called AppleCare and you're often pitched it via push notifications on your iPhone or your Mac book or in the store. And it's what, like 200 or 12 a month. It's like a full on. subscription fee hgf: so that offsetkeyz: you can go to the Apple store and then pay additional fees to get it repaired. It's just to lock in lower fees, like it's not actually protecting your device. hgf: Yeah, that always confused me. I haven't done it And, offsetkeyz: part of their model is confusion. You're paying this 200 in hopes that your repairs will be free like most insurance, but it's not. That's where Apple makes a lot of its money. Tons of money. That being said, to answer Hot Girl Farmer's initial question, the repair experience at an Apple store is terrible. Every other experience in an Apple store is magical. Well, unless you go in there to buy a Bose headset, there's no cash registers. So it's a little hard to flag someone down, but otherwise, you know, I bought my Mac book there and they transferred everything over. They charged it up. They did a little tour for me. I had like my own little personal concierge person walking me through that. hgf: a curated experience. Everything in there looks really nice. I'm just really minimalist, So the repair process. offsetkeyz: Right. Yeah. The, the whole repair process, and I don't think anyone will argue that because they have a monopoly on it, they haven't put much focus there. So booking an appointment, they ask all kinds of questions and then they have to then take your device for days and maybe they repair it and maybe they just give you a new one. hgf: Have you ever subscribed to AppleCare? offsetkeyz: I have and I believe I am a current subscriber to apple care for my airpods. hgf: Um offsetkeyz: I've had Two pairs of AirPods die, like just unable to be charged. And the first pair was one day after the normal warranty. It was literally the day after my warranty expired. So I went in and I couldn't exchange them because it was after the warranty. So I bought a new pair and I bought AppleCare, hgf: Okay. offsetkeyz: which only extends it for about a year. But an interesting thing about AirPods. Is that their battery is welded to the device. You can't, no one can repair and replace the battery to AirPods. So as soon as they go bad, they are literally trash. They just go right in the trash can. hgf: Yeah, those are designed to get tossed. offsetkeyz: But what happens if only one of your AirPods, like one bud went bad and the other one's battery still works fine, yet you throw it into the trash? Like, what? What could happen? hgf: with e waste, we want to dispose of that through a disposal company that manages e waste because a lot of these products have lithium batteries in them, which needs to be handled with care. And other batteries have heavy metals in them. And just different chemical and mechanical components that a lot of these products can be recycled and kind of stripped down for the metal pieces of it. And so like with wiring and cords and different parts of it. Those can be recycled. What I've heard is that older pieces of technology can actually be deconstructed much better and recycled and there's more valuable metals like older pieces of tech have gold and copper in them so it's like valuable and worth the effort to recycling versus a lot of e waste now is plastic, the batteries of airpods can't come out, a lot of it is useless and not quite worth the effort, offsetkeyz: and where, can you find like drop offs for these e waste things? I know they're around, but do you know of any like specific brand name stores that might have any? hgf: any? Ooh, that's a good question. I need to check, but I'm pretty sure Staples has a drop off option. But I would check, I would Google your city that you live in, or county, if you're in a more rural area, and e scrap, e waste, and then they should have a resource for disposal options there. offsetkeyz: should have a resource for disposal options there. trucks that catch on fire from compacting lithium batteries it's kind of an Pretty hgf: Pretty much anything that's rechargeable has a lithium battery in it, so you do not wanna put it in the trashcan. Cities and counties are really having to bear the weight of managing these types of fires every so often. offsetkeyz: So, if the baTteries are lucky enough to make it through the trash truck route without catching all the trash on fire, what other risks are there for disposing of your batteries just in the regular trash? So hgf: e waste, sitting in landfills, electronics, can leach heavy metals into the soil like arsenic, mercury, and lead and so this will contaminate the soil, potentially the groundwater. It rains, we can have toxic runoff. It's best to dispose of your tech properly. We want to tackle this issue at the source. Which, you know, starts with Apple taking accountability for their impact on the environment. That's it. which I found that they do have an e waste recycling program. It says it depends on your area, so you can go to Apple's website, type in electronic recycling, and then they have a search where you can see what your options are. What some people might not know is recycling is a business, so any private haulers like Rumpke, Republic, Waste management. What they take in your area is based on what is there a market demand for in your area? So if your area doesn't take glass, they don't have a buyer of glass. So whether or not companies have a buyer dictates what they take. Our area does not take type 5 plastics, which are like white sour cream jars. They don't take that because they don't have a buyer for type 5. But a couple counties over they do, they have a company that will buy those products. So they sort them, bail them up, and then the company comes and picks it up a small price. offsetkeyz: I just assumed that if a product was recyclable, like aluminum is infinitely recyclable, paper can be recycled pretty easily, cardboard can be recycled pretty easily, milk cartons obviously can be recycled, whatever, if it is recyclable, the government should be paying to have it recycled, right? That's the way that I thought. And then only recently did I get to take a tour of a recycling plant to find out that they don't take Orange juice cartons because no one will buy orange juice cartons. So even though those are completely recyclable They're just going to landfills and they're often going into the recycling because people know that they're recyclable hgf: From a technical stance, yeah. offsetkeyz: Yeah, technically they can be recycled so they get put into recycling bins and that might reduce the amount of recyclable materials in that bin that can then be processed because it's quote, contaminated, which is a thing, but it's not a reason to not recycle. It's not as impactful as you think. So I don't know if I should address that, that rumor of Contamination. Like, if you throw a material that isn't recyclable into the recycling bin, the whole truck is not contaminated. hgf: Yeah, they have a pretty good process at most facilities to sort that stuff out. Definitely look at your local government's website of what they take and don't take to be sure. But it's not the end of the world if your city doesn't take cartons and you put a carton in there. Usually when the whole load is contaminated and tossed, it's pretty rare because they do want to have that product to sell. And then it'll usually be if something's sticky and wet is all over everything. So your products don't have to be a hundred percent clean and dry, like spotless and completely dry. But if you threw a gallon of ice cream in your bin, that's gonna get all over the whole truck. offsetkeyz: truck. hgf: I got an email a couple weeks ago about There being a mysterious sludge in the bottom of someone's recycling cart like the top was recyclables But they filled I mean what looked like toxic waste It was like sticky and the whole bottom of the bin like a couple inches high So that all got dumped into the truckload and they had to throw away the whole truck. They don't want to do that typically because they have to pay a landfill tipping fee to go to the landfill and toss that load. So it's really, you know, people are like, recycling isn't real, all goes to trash. Companies have to pay to dispose of the trash. They have to pay a landfill to use it. versus they can get a little bit paid for your recycled materials. So your products are being recycled. It's not a complete myth. It's not as perfect and seamless as we once thought. And water bottles can't be made into new water bottles. They can only be downcycled into fibers. But I just hate that rumor that recycling isn't real. It's very important and it does happen. offsetkeyz: , I find it interesting that recycling is a business. It's important to keep that in mind because as Hot Girl Farmer mentioned earlier, electronics used to be made With a lot more valuable materials like copper and gold and now they're being made with cheap materials so had they been made with nicer materials still there's a chance that recycling companies would take them and dispose of them properly so that they could sell the materials out of them but as it stands right now an iPhone doesn't have any valuable materials in it so it's literally just filling up landfills no one's getting any value from them after after they're disposed of. Don't throw your electronics in the trash regardless. The batteries are probably glued in and can catch fire because they're probably still active. If they don't catch fire they're going to go to a landfill. The landfill is going to get compressed and this includes energizer batteries too because those get compressed. The toxic materials out of those batteries end up leaking out into the environment creating a toxic sludge Which, over time, will start to work its way towards your water source, wherever that is, or where your food is grown, or whatever. It's polluting the environment, and we don't need any more of that. Right hgf: any more of that. And we kind of got off offsetkeyz: we kind of got off on a little tangent about recycling, which is always great, always needs to be heard. But, just to recap, the right to repair movement will increase the lifespan of your devices, directly decreasing the amount that go into the landfill. hgf: can kind of move into offsetkeyz: So yeah, we can kind of move into sort of the security implications of this. One of the other reasons I moved over to an entirely Apple ecosystem is they lock your device to you, which is what this movement is against, right? If someone steals my MacBook, they can't use any part of it. hgf: They offsetkeyz: can't open it up and take the motherboard because that motherboard is locked to me. They can't open it up and use the chip. They can't open it up, do anything. They can't use the screen. They can't do anything. That is terrible for landfills because one device, one person, that's like if your car was locked to you and the tires came welded on, right? Like it's, hgf: it's great for offsetkeyz: the company making the cars, but. There would just be cars everywhere being thrown away because they couldn't sell them secondhand, right? So I love that from a security perspective. I feel comfortable. Well, not quite comfortable But leaving my MacBook on the passenger seat of my car when I go into the coffee shop because by this point Criminals who are breaking into cars know that they can't sell my MacBook They have no incentive to steal it. So they won't go and break into my car for that MacBook that's sitting there. Right? So one of the biggest security implications with the right to repair movement is that will no longer be possible since we can't lock hardware to software. And again, just to reiterate, my concern is that there will be a lot more theft of these in order to try to get the parts out of them. Right? So that's a big physical security concern. So this does open up the door for new patents, new ideas. I don't know if anything like this exists, but Apple is likely going to try to figure out a way to continue to lock devices to people, because people like me want that in the product. And I'm sure there are ways that you can maybe tell the device that you're about to repair it, tell it what part you're about to replace, maybe input the serial number for that part, hgf: and offsetkeyz: once you put it in you let the device know that the repair is complete and it maybe runs a scan of the new piece and then locks it. I don't know, it's got to be possible. I'm just spitballing ideas here, but maybe if an unrecognized or an uncertified part is placed into an iPhone, there is a permanent banner on the top of the iPhone in red that says this iPhone is now using non certified parts. As soon as this goes into effect, people who sell their used iPhones, like I have, I think most of my iPhones I've sold, the value is going down drastically because you can't verify that that is using certified parts anymore. Up until this bill, all iPhones had certified iPhone parts because no other parts could be put in their iPhone. It was a guarantee. So buying an iPhone, buying an Apple watch, I'm wearing a used Apple watch right now. was a safe bet on Facebook marketplace in a sea of unsafe bets hgf: Yeah, my thing with this is for profit companies, I feel like, always find a way. They have the resources and the staff usually to accommodate these new laws versus it's not fair for local governments and entities have to scramble to pick up the pieces and deal with this mess. I think with any environmental issue, the emphasis needs to be put on the manufacturer, the for profit businesses, to handle their products responsibly. It doesn't make sense to me that And Apple stores in a town selling a bunch of iPhones, creating a lot of e waste, and then it's the municipality's job to scramble and figure it out. It's like, you're doing business here. You figure it out. offsetkeyz: Right. As soon as the product leaves your doors, it's no longer your responsibility. hgf: whack. Yeah, I think we're offsetkeyz: yeah, I think we're in the next 10 to 20 to 30 years. We're going to start to see a shift where companies are going to start to be responsible. They're going to be held responsible for the entire life. Of their product from maintenance and repairs to disposal it all like like I hate to see Plastic Starbucks cups laying in the gutter when I'm on my evening jog or whatever It's like as soon as that cup is handed to the consumer it becomes their problem like we need we need to have Starbucks Trash trucks driving around every city just picking up Starbucks cups or the government can fine Starbucks for every cup it finds. Maybe, maybe that's the new aluminum can business for, for homeless people. They go around and pick up Starbucks cups and the government will give them 10 cents per cup or something like that. And they can go then find Starbucks for, I don't know, but companies now are going to have to start becoming accountable for their products. hgf: Yeah, remember we're in an era of all time corporate offsetkeyz: yeah. Corporate hgf: Oh yeah. All time highs. offsetkeyz: Corporations are getting bigger and bigger and richer and richer and finding new ways to stifle out competition. One of the other concerns that I came up with when preparing this episode was if third party parts or certified parts are allowed into iPhones. Like, what's the limit? Am I gonna start are we gonna start seeing completely Aftermarket iPhones out there that I mean, it's just crazy it's it's possible hgf: we offsetkeyz: make our PCs from the from the ground up with a case and a graphics processor and a CPU RAM and Throw windows on there and it's a fully functioning PC. Is that gonna be what happens to iPhones? hgf: Yeah, I can't see that. I can't picture them letting that happen. So, the last security concern I did want to talk about is if we're giving the ability to third parties to repair with their own parts. Right now, they have to be certified parts, at least in Oregon, but I don't know how these laws will progress. It could be possible that down the line they're allowed to, repair them with any part. offsetkeyz: There's a thing called hardware vulnerabilities. Uh, which Apple actually just discovered one on their own devices, which affects encryption and it's, it's hardware. So there's nothing you can do in the code to prevent it. Every little piece of hardware could have these vulnerabilities. And if you're allowing third party parts into your iPhone, those third party parts might not be quite as secure as the ones that are developed by Apple and tested by Apple. They might be good enough to get the job done, but But they might not be as secure and that's all well and good. You know, you can continue to go to the Apple store for your repairs, even after these laws are placed, but that does directly impact the brand that is Apple once their devices are no longer guaranteed to be as secure as they claim they are and. I think that will go hand in hand with the signing of the hardware and Apple has some things to figure out. Luckily they have lots of smart people at Apple. They'll likely figure something out to make sure, to guarantee security. But they've got their work cut out for them. And yeah, it's a very important reminder that this is the pioneer phase of the right to repair movement. There's gonna be things they're not getting right right off the bat. As far as we're concerned, as far as The Daily Decrypt's concerned, it's important to support this movement. Because there has to be a middle ground between complete monopolization of your devices, leading to tons of waste and a shorter lifespan. And just the wild, wild west, with counterfeit devices and no security updates and all the, there's got to be a middle ground, uh, and we have to find it, and we might make some mistakes along the way, but we're going to continue to support this movement, hgf: We love middle ground. offsetkeyz: a lukewarm family here at the Daily Decrypt. But yeah, keep tuning in, we'll keep coming at you with these updates as the right to repair movement progresses. But that's all we got for you today. Huge thanks to Hot Girl Farmer for coming on and sharing her solid waste soliloquy. hgf: Oh my gosh. offsetkeyz: Thank you for sharing your solid waste soliloquy. And we will talk to you some more next time. hgf: time. guys. for a nap. hgf: I know. I'm so sleepy offsetkeyz: It's all that Michelob Ultra. hgf: Hmmmm. I'm a little offsetkeyz: I'm a little wired, you can probably tell. We just swapped bodies for a second. I was just like, words, words, words, words, words, words, words.

Many human trafficking survivors are coerced to incur consumer debt at the behest of their traffickers. This destroys the survivor's credit and imposes significant barriers to housing, education and other important resources. The new federal Debt Bondage Repair Act provides a mechanism for survivors of trafficking to block this adverse information from their credit reports.  Questions? Inquiries about program materials? Contact Trenon Browne at tbrowne@bostonbar.org This webinar will provide an overview of the federal law, its accompanying regulations, and potential pathways to implementation in Massachusetts, including the critical role to be played by government agencies in enhancing access to this process. The speakers will also address ways that legal counsel, advocates and social service providers can assist survivors in accessing this important protection in the near term.    Additionally, this program will be relevant for government lawyers, pro bono programs and all lawyers and service providers who work with survivors of human trafficking.    

This week, the Right to Repair Act is now Oregon law, WordCamp US 2024 tickets are now on sale, Oregon UAS (drone) Accelerator applications are due, AI Portland has a new AI podcast, First Friday at UpStart Collective Westside, and Westside Pitch Competition. Let's get into it. ABOUT SILICON FLORIST ---------- For nearly two decades, Rick Turoczy has published Silicon Florist, a blog and podcast that covers founders, startups, entrepreneurship, tech, news, and events in the Portland, Oregon, startup community. Whether you're an aspiring entrepreneur, a startup or tech enthusiast, or simply intrigued by Portland's startup culture, Silicon Florist is your go-to source for the latest news, events, jobs, and opportunities in Portland Oregon's flourishing tech and startup scene. Join us in exploring the innovative world of startups in Portland, where creativity and collaboration meet. ABOUT RICK TUROCZY ---------- Rick Turoczy has been working in, on, and around the Portland, Oregon, startup community for nearly 30 years. He has been recognized as one of the “OG”s of startup ecosystem building by the Kauffman Foundation. And he has been humbled by any number of opportunities to speak on stages from SXSW to INBOUND and from Kobe, Japan, to Muscat, Oman, including an opportunity to share his views on community building on the TEDxPortland stage (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj98mr_wUA0). All because of a blog. Weird. https://siliconflorist.com #portland

It's estimated that roughly 70% of car repairs performed after a warranty expires are done by independent shops. However, if the manufacturers have their way, all this work would be restricted to dealerships, with drivers forced to sacrifice the convenience and affordability their local mechanics now provide. The stakes are high, as is the momentum to prevent this from happening. Ted Hughes of the Auto Care Association joins the podcast to discuss The Repair Act, legislation introduced in Washington to avert such a development. “This issue is truly mission critical,” he tells the guys. “It really is something that's absolutely vitally important for anybody that's involved with the independent aftermarket.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Recorded Live at AAPEX 2023, our panel dives into the progress of the Right to Repair bill that could potentially reshape our industry. Without the Right to Repair Act, our industry could face a staggering $93 billion hit by 2035. Kathleen Callahan, who testified in front of Congress, shared her experience and the momentum it created for the bill. It's crucial for industry professionals to understand the bill, advocate for it, and engage with their communities and legislators. Dwayne Myers, Dynamic Automotive, 6 locations, Maryland. Dwayne's previous episodes HERE. Jennifer Keaton, Director of Government Affairs, Auto Care Association Kathleen Callahan, Xpertech Auto Repair, Englewood, FL Show Notes Watch Full Video IDC Hearing: "Proposals To Enhance Product Safety And Transparency For Americans: https://www.youtube.com/live/AU1vg7Xsw88?feature=shared The testimony before Congress (00:02:01) Kathleen Callahan's testimony in front of a congressional subcommittee and her experience preparing for it. Magic Johnson's keynote speech (00:04:38) Discussion about Magic Johnson's speech at the event, his support for small businesses, and the request for his support for right to repair. Getting a bill in front of Congress (00:08:13) The process and hard work involved in getting a bill, specifically the Repair Act (HR 906), in front of Congress. The legislative process and subcommittee hearing (00:08:36) Discussion about advancing a bill through the legislative process, the importance of the subcommittee hearing, and the next steps of getting the bill to a markup. The significance of markup (00:09:35) Explaining what markup means in the legislative process and how it signifies that the bill is moving forward. The importance of right to repair legislation (00:12:53) Highlighting the potential impact of not passing right to repair legislation, including the loss of market share and the negative consequences for the industry and consumers. Kathleen's Confident Testimony (00:17:27) Kathleen's confident and professional testimony, her preparation, and the positive feedback received. The Importance of Questions (00:17:59) The importance of paying attention to the questions asked during testimony and the impact of facial expressions. Strategic Selection of Kathleen (00:20:05) The strategic selection of Kathleen as the only woman shop owner from Florida to represent the industry. The importance of marketing and being active in advocacy (00:25:49) Dwayne emphasizes the importance of continuous marketing efforts and being proactive in advocating for the industry. Telematics as the new right to repair (00:26:24) Tthe significance of telematics and the potential challenges it poses for gaining access to vehicle data. Equitable access to repair and diagnostic data (00:26:47) Kathleen highlights the need for repair shops to have equal access to repair and diagnostic data as dealerships, and the importance of showing legislators the impact of the industry. Thanks to our Partners, AAPEX and NAPA TRACS Set

Episode 622: On today's Unscripted,  Roy Wright, IBHS president and CEO, tells us about the latest wildfire mitigation research and shares how the organization educates homeowners to protect property from severe weather disruptions. 

The Agricultural Right to Repair Act defines what type of information Original Equipment Manufacturers are required to provide to make repair accessible. If the OEM does not have the digital or physical tools available, they are required to provide sufficient information to create the tools.The bill also gives the Federal Trade Commission the ability to enforce these requirements and the ability to make a rule to assist in the implementation of these requirements.

Episode 620: On today's Unscripted, NAMIC CEO Neil Alldredge talks with Elizabeth Heck, NAMIC chair and president and CEO of Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company, about the broad impact of the association's advocacy efforts and her optimism that the industry will continue to embrace any challenge that comes its way. 

The Agricultural Right to Repair Act is applauded by the National Farmers Union, and USDA announces second round of payments through the Organic Dairy Marketing Assistance Program.

The Agricultural Right to Repair Act is applauded by the National Farmers Union, and USDA announces second round of payments through the Organic Dairy Marketing Assistance Program.

The Agricultural Right to Repair Act was introduced in both the House and Senate, and the legislation is strongly supported by the National Farmers Union. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode 414 avec Sebastien B. et Stuff. La revue de presse : • C comme Californie (00:04:05) : Encore un nouveau Repair Act aux US. La Californie se dotte d'un nouveau repair act pour permettre aux consommateurs de réparer leur matériel. (Source : androidcentral.com) • L comme Linux (00:15:18) : Le LTS du Kernel Linux sera limité à 2 ans. Le long term support - LTS - du noyau Linux sera limité à 2 ans. (Source : zdnet.com) • N comme Nintendo (00:23:40) : Nintendo serait dans le viseur de Microsoft. Microsoft intéressé par un rachat de Nintendo. (Source : frandroid.com) • T comme Téléscope (00:29:17) : Les téléscopes sous le feu... de pirates. Les téléscopes spaciaux seraient les dernières victimes de cyberattaques. (Source : undernews.fr) • X comme Xwitter (00:34:42) : X valide maintenant les identités digitales . X valide maintenant les identités digitales . (Source : techcrunch.com) Dossier : Apple Vision Pro et visionOS (00:41:31) • Conversation avec Manu @stuffmc Carrasco Molina, senior SwiftUI et (actuellement) junior visionOS dévelopeur. Retrouvez toutes nos informations, liens, versions du podcast via notre site : LesTechnos.be

Episode 414 avec Sebastien B. et Stuff.La revue de presse :• C comme Californie (00:04:05) : Encore un nouveau Repair Act aux US. La Californie se dotte d'un nouveau repair act pour permettre aux consommateurs de réparer leur matériel. (Source : androidcentral.com) • L comme Linux (00:15:18) : Le LTS du Kernel Linux sera limité à 2 ans. Le long term support - LTS - du noyau Linux sera limité à 2 ans. (Source : zdnet.com) • N comme Nintendo (00:23:40) : Nintendo serait dans le viseur de Microsoft. Microsoft intéressé par un rachat de Nintendo. (Source : frandroid.com) • T comme Téléscope (00:29:17) : Les téléscopes sous le feu... de pirates. Les téléscopes spaciaux seraient les dernières victimes de cyberattaques. (Source : undernews.fr) • X comme Xwitter (00:34:42) : X valide maintenant les identités digitales . X valide maintenant les identités digitales . (Source : techcrunch.com) Dossier : Apple Vision Pro et visionOS (00:41:31)• Conversation avec Manu @stuffmc Carrasco Molina, senior SwiftUI et (actuellement) junior visionOS développeur. Retrouvez toutes nos informations, liens, versions du podcast via notre site : LesTechnos.be

On this day in history, August 30, 1967 Thurgood Marshall was confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice, becoming the first African-American to be seated on the court. Thurgood Marshall was a pioneering American civil rights lawyer and jurist, serving as the first African-American associate justice on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1967 to 1991. Before his time on the bench, he was a leading attorney for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, where he played a crucial role in the fight against racial segregation in American public schools. His most notable achievement came with the landmark 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education, which declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional. Marshall was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Lyndon B. Johnson, and he was known for his liberal views, often dissenting as the Court shifted to a more conservative stance.Born and educated in Baltimore, Maryland, Marshall was mentored by Charles Hamilton Houston at Howard University School of Law. Together with Houston, he worked on several significant civil rights cases, eventually succeeding him as the special counsel of the NAACP. In 1961, he was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit by President John F. Kennedy and later served as the U.S. Solicitor General before his Supreme Court appointment.Throughout his tenure, Marshall was known for his pragmatic jurisprudence and his "sliding-scale" approach to the Equal Protection Clause, advocating for a flexible balancing test. He was a fervent opponent of the death penalty and supported a broad interpretation of constitutional protections, including First Amendment rights and abortion rights. Marshall retired in 1991 and was succeeded by Clarence Thomas; he passed away in 1993.An investor in AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc., Rose Izzo, is seeking a financial reward for her role in reducing legal fees in a recent settlement concerning the conversion of AMC's APE preferred units into common stock. Izzo argues that her legal team should receive $650,000 for convincing a Delaware judge to award only about $7 million in fees to the lawyers representing the pension fund and individual investor in the case, instead of the $20 million they had initially sought. This legal skirmish is the latest chapter in a contentious battle over AMC's APE units, which were created to raise new equity capital without increasing the company's authorized share limit.AMC's stock price has plummeted nearly 80% since the settlement was approved on August 11. Izzo claims that her efforts saved the company $13 million, as the judge decided to base the 12% fee award on the post-conversion stock price, as she had recommended. The case originally began when a pension fund and other shareholders opposed allowing APE holders to vote on AMC's recapitalization proposals. The settlement aimed to address these objections by offering one extra class A share for every 7.5 held, valuing the deal at around $110 million to $120 million, depending on AMC's volatile stock price.Vice Chancellor Morgan T. Zurn initially rejected the deal but later approved a revised settlement, causing fluctuations in AMC's stock and the value of APE units. Izzo's role has been considered unusual due to the involvement of "meme stock" investors, who have been vocal about their concerns regarding stock dilution and market manipulation. Izzo and her legal team have faced significant online harassment, which they argue justifies their requested financial reward. The case continues to be a focal point of legal and financial scrutiny, with a new lawsuit filed by an APE holder challenging the settlement for diluting the value of preferred units.AMC Settlement Objector Seeks Fees Over Collapsing Stock PriceA pension fund has filed a lawsuit against Peter Thiel and other board members of Palantir Technologies Inc., accusing them of making billions through insider trading while artificially inflating the company's stock price. The suit also targets Palantir's president Stephen Cohen and CEO Alex Karp, alleging that they led the company into risky investments with special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) for personal gain. According to the complaint, many of these SPACs had unrealistic business plans and were doomed to fail. The lawsuit claims that Thiel and others were motivated to keep Palantir's stock price high to maximize their returns through stock options.The suit alleges that these actions led to a stock crash, resulting in $272 million in losses for Palantir due to the failure of its SPAC investments. Before the crash, Thiel, Karp, and Cohen reportedly made over $1.5 billion by selling shares at inflated prices. Other company leaders allegedly made around $700 million. The lawsuit states that these SPAC deals were closely tied to Palantir's public debut in September 2020 and were part of a larger scheme to inflate the stock price, which also involved misleading investors about the sustainability of government contracts.The complaint notes that out of the 28 SPACs Palantir invested in, five have declared bankruptcy, one has been delisted, and several others have either failed to go public or were taken private again. The lawsuit is a shareholder derivative claim, meaning any damages awarded would go into Palantir's corporate coffers. The suit mirrors securities fraud claims already facing Palantir in a federal court in Denver, exposing the company to potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in additional liability. The lawsuit was filed by the Central Laborers' Pension Fund and eight individual investors.If you're wondering where you've heard of Peter Thiel before, it might be me. Peter Thiel is an entrepreneur, investor, and co-founder of companies like PayPal and Palantir. Earlier this year I wrote a column about his utilizing Roth IRAs to amass significant wealth, specifically by converting a $2,000 investment in 1999 into $5 billion by 2027. Thiel managed this by purchasing undervalued stock options in startups, leveraging his unique access to these investment opportunities. His case has highlighted the capacity for high earners to exploit Roth IRAs far beyond their intended use as retirement savings for the middle class, sparking discussions on reforming the tax code. Now, it seems, he is facing accusations of insider trading. Palantir SPAC Spree Draws Insider Trading Lawsuit Against ThielRoth IRAs Have Transformed Into Big Tax Shelters for the WealthyGrayscale Investments LLC has secured a significant legal victory in its effort to launch a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), potentially opening the door for billions of dollars in retail investments. The win came against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a three-judge appeals panel in Washington. The SEC has generally only approved crypto ETFs based on futures, citing them as safer, but is now reviewing this latest decision. The ruling is seen as a setback for SEC Chair Gary Gensler's efforts to regulate the crypto industry more tightly.Following the news, Grayscale's Bitcoin Trust saw a rally of up to 21%, and Bitcoin itself surged by as much as 8.3%. Grayscale argues that converting to an ETF would unlock billions in value for its $16.2 billion trust by making it easier to create and redeem shares. The current closed-end structure of the trust does not allow for share redemption when prices fall, leading to steep discounts to its underlying Bitcoin value.This ruling marks the SEC's second recent high-profile court defeat regarding its stance on cryptocurrencies. The agency is also contesting a federal judge's ruling that Ripple Labs' XRP tokens are not securities. Grayscale's victory could have a broad impact, as several major financial institutions have recently filed applications to launch Bitcoin ETFs.Grayscale called the decision a "monumental step forward for American investors." Analysts see the ruling as adding momentum to the digital asset industry, especially following the Ripple case. The SEC had initially rejected Grayscale's proposal in 2022, arguing that a Bitcoin-based ETF lacked sufficient oversight for fraud detection. Grayscale sued the SEC, accusing it of discriminatory treatment.The court found that Grayscale had provided "substantial evidence" that its product was similar to approved Bitcoin futures ETFs. The SEC now has 45 days to ask for a full review by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, and if declined, 90 days to petition the U.S. Supreme Court.Crypto Scores Landmark US Legal Win With Grayscale ETF RulingA U.S. judge is set to consider the sentencing of two former leaders of the right-wing group Proud Boys, Enrique Tarrio and Ethan Nordean, who were convicted of seditious conspiracy and other crimes related to the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Prosecutors are recommending 33 years in prison for Tarrio and 27 years for Nordean, exceeding the longest sentence given so far for the Capitol assault. The attack aimed to prevent Congress from certifying President Joe Biden's election win. Prosecutors are also seeking a terrorism enhancement for the sentences, which could add approximately 15 years to each term.More than 1,000 people have been arrested in connection with the Capitol attack, with at least 570 pleading guilty and 78 convicted at trial. The riot resulted in five deaths, including a police officer, and injuries to over 140 police officers, along with millions of dollars in damage to the Capitol. Special Counsel Jack Smith has charged former President Donald Trump for attempting to remain in power unlawfully.Attorneys for Tarrio and Nordean are opposing the terrorism enhancement, arguing that their clients' actions should not be equated with acts like the Oklahoma City bombing. Tarrio was not present in Washington, D.C., during the attack but is accused of directing it from Baltimore. The case has had a significant emotional impact on Capitol Police, as described in a letter submitted to the court. Sentencing for two other defendants, Joseph Biggs and Zachary Rehl, is due on Thursday, with prosecutors seeking 33 and 30 years respectively. A fifth defendant, Dominic Pezzola, faces a recommended 20-year sentence.Ex-Proud Boys leaders face sentencing for Jan. 6 attack on U.S. CapitolA study at the University of Minnesota found that low-performing law students improved their exam scores when using artificial intelligence, specifically GPT-4, while high-performing students saw a decline in their scores. Researchers compared the final exam scores of 48 students in two law courses. The students first took exams without AI assistance and then took different exams using GPT-4. The study found that GPT-4 significantly improved student performance on multiple-choice questions, with a 29 percentage-point improvement overall and a 45 percentage-point increase for low-performing students.However, GPT-4 did not help students on the essay portions of the exams. High-performing students actually scored about 20 percentage points lower when using the AI. The study suggests that AI could have an equalizing effect in the legal profession by mitigating inequalities between elite and non-elite lawyers.The study's lead researcher, Daniel Schwarcz, speculated that high-performing students might have become lazier or less inclined to use their legal reasoning skills when assisted by AI. He noted that once an issue is framed by someone else, or in this case, something else like AI, it can affect the cognitive mindset for independent assessment. Schwarcz also suggested that AI's impact within the legal profession would most likely affect paralegals and younger attorneys, as some of their tasks could be automated.These law students got to use AI on final exams. How'd they do? | ReutersiFixit, known for its teardowns and repair guides, is petitioning the U.S. government to allow it to create parts for fixing McDonald's notoriously unreliable ice cream machines. The company purchased the same model of ice cream machine used by McDonald's and found that despite having "easily replaceable parts," the machine could only be repaired by its manufacturer, Taylor, due to an agreement with McDonald's. iFixit is facing legal hurdles because of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which prevents circumventing digital locks to access copyrighted works.To address this, iFixit and nonprofit Public Knowledge have filed for an exemption to the DMCA specifically for ice cream machines. iFixit has previously won such exemptions for products like Xboxes, tractors, and smartphones. However, even if the exemption is granted, iFixit won't be able to distribute a tool for fixing the machines under current law.Therefore, iFixit is also urging Congress to reintroduce the Freedom to Repair Act, which would make it legal to bypass software locks for the purpose of repair. If these changes are implemented, the days of broken McDonald's ice cream machines could be numbered.iFixit wants Congress to let it hack McDonald's ice cream machines - The Verge Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

A company called iFixit says passing the Freedom to Repair Act could help fix the infamous broken ice cream machines at McDonald's restaurants. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week: the good, the bad, the UGLY! We're talking what we like and don't about iPhone 15 and Vision Pro. Plus... a VERY special guest... This episode supported by Factor is America's #1 Ready-To-Eat Meal Kit, and can help you fuel up fast with ready-to-eat meals delivered straight to your door. Head to factormeals.com/cultcast50 and use code cultcast50 to get 50% off your first box. Easily create a beautiful website all by yourself, at Squarespace.com/cultcast. Use offer code CultCast at checkout to get 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain. Cult of Mac's watch store is full of beautiful straps that cost way less than Apple's. See the full curated collection at Store.Cultofmac.com CultCloth will keep your Mac Studio, Studio Display, iPhone 14, glasses and lenses sparkling clean, and for a limited time use code CULTCAST at checkout to score a free CarryCloth with any order at CultCloth.co. iPhone Life Tip of the Day Newsletter Ad Read for BackBeat Media URL: https://www.iphonelife.com/dailytips This week's stories Leander: Apple backs California's Right to Repair Act After years of Apple fighting and delaying the Repair bill in various US states, Apple sent Senator Sustan Talamantes Eggman a letter endorsing the Right to Repair Act in California.   Lewis: Apple's iPhone 15 cables could be limited to sluggish data transfers Reports say the USB-C port in the iPhone 15 is much faster, as we talked about last week, however, the cables that will ship with the iPhone 15 series will allegedly support only USB 2.0. If true, that will limit data transfers to a relatively poky 480 Mbit/s.   Leander: Meet an Unsung Apple Hero in this free e-book Interface designer Bas Ording is one of those little-known Apple employees who has had a huge influence on our digital lives.   Lewis: Clean your filthy Apple Watch bands, people Your Apple Watch band could be a breeding ground for potentially dangerous pathogens, according to a new study. Scientists found that 95% of the watchbands they tested were contaminated with “bacteria of public health importance.”   Griffin: 6 useful apps hiding in your Mac If you work on a Mac, these six useful apps can help you get that work done faster.  

1. 2004 Chevy Tahoe Bent Radiator replacement. 2. 2015 Silverado why is the paint coming off? 3. 2014 Toyota Corolla runs rough at cold start 4. 1994 Chevy Truck runs rough. 5. 2000 Subaru Forester S Stall when stopping 6. NHTSA Right to Repair Act update 7. Winning a new Subaru times 2 !

Benjamin and Chance analyze this week's flurry of leaks about the supposed cable coming in the iPhone 15 box. Apple also started up the Vision Pro PR machine, released the latest iOS 17 beta, and why a 2021 movie jumped to the top of the TV+ charts.  Sponsored by Factor: Factor has everything I need for a week of flavorful, nutritious eats. Head to factormeals.com/happyhour50 and use code happyhour50 to get 50% off your first box. Sponsored by Zocdoc: Go to Zocdoc.com/happyhour and download the Zocdoc app to sign-up for free and book a top-rated doctor. Many are available as soon as today. Hosts Chance Miller @ChanceHMiller on Twitter @chancehmiller@mastodon.social @ChanceHMiller on Instagram @ChanceHMiller on Threads Benjamin Mayo @bzamayo on Twitter @bzamayo@mastodon.social @bzamayo on Threads Subscribe, Rate, and Review Apple Podcasts Overcast Spotify Ad-free version You can get an ad-free version of 9to5Mac Happy Hour on Apple Podcasts each week for $5 per month or $50 per year. Feedback Submit #Ask9to5Mac questions on Twitter, Mastodon, or Threads Email us feedback and questions to happyhour@9to5mac.com Links iPhone 15 charging cable may be long enough to actually use USB-C cable included with iPhone 15 may be limited to USB 2.0 iPhone 15 rumors: 'Ultra' name potential, braided USB-C cables iOS 17 beta hints at new Action Button on iPhone 15 Pro iOS 17 Apple Maps suggests an offline map to download when getting directions to an area with poor cell service Apple decides to support Right to Repair Act bill in California Fantastical, Widgetsmith, and Spool makers dish on Apple Vision Pro development Threads for web rolling out this week, confirms Zuckerberg

Benjamin and Chance analyze this week's flurry of leaks about the supposed cable coming in the iPhone 15 box. Apple also started up the Vision Pro PR machine, released the latest iOS 17 beta, and why a 2021 movie jumped to the top of the TV+ charts.  Sponsored by Factor: Factor has everything I need for a week of flavorful, nutritious eats. Head to factormeals.com/happyhour50 and use code happyhour50 to get 50% off your first box. Sponsored by Zocdoc: Go to Zocdoc.com/happyhour and download the Zocdoc app to sign-up for free and book a top-rated doctor. Many are available as soon as today. Hosts Chance Miller @ChanceHMiller on Twitter @chancehmiller@mastodon.social @ChanceHMiller on Instagram @ChanceHMiller on Threads Benjamin Mayo @bzamayo on Twitter @bzamayo@mastodon.social @bzamayo on Threads Subscribe, Rate, and Review Apple Podcasts Overcast Spotify Ad-free version You can get an ad-free version of 9to5Mac Happy Hour on Apple Podcasts each week for $5 per month or $50 per year. Feedback Submit #Ask9to5Mac questions on Twitter, Mastodon, or Threads Email us feedback and questions to happyhour@9to5mac.com Links iPhone 15 charging cable may be long enough to actually use USB-C cable included with iPhone 15 may be limited to USB 2.0 iPhone 15 rumors: 'Ultra' name potential, braided USB-C cables iOS 17 beta hints at new Action Button on iPhone 15 Pro iOS 17 Apple Maps suggests an offline map to download when getting directions to an area with poor cell service Apple decides to support Right to Repair Act bill in California Fantastical, Widgetsmith, and Spool makers dish on Apple Vision Pro development Threads for web rolling out this week, confirms Zuckerberg

This week, Mike and Jeremy discuss Ford cutting the F150 Lighting's price, another big Honda recall, and Tesla's producing their first new Cybertruck.  Mike's review is the new Jeep Gladiator Mojave. Their guest is Brian Herron from Opus IVS, who explains the Right to Repair Act and how it impacts the price we pay for repairs. Mike and Jrmy discuss the best soon-to-be classic cars to buy now and hold, and they also speak with Cheryl McCarron from GM about the auto industry's impact on the US economy. Good Stuff!

Lisa Foshee, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs and General Counsel for the Auto Care Association, discusses the recent letter from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) instructing auto manufacturers not to comply with the data access law in Massachusetts. This letter has caused concern for those advocating for the right to repair legislation, as it could hinder progress. But why is the right to repair legislation so important? It allows car owners to have access to the same diagnostic and repair information that dealerships have. This means that car owners can choose where to get their car repaired, and not be forced to go to a dealership for repairs. Lisa Foshee, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs and General Counsel of the Auto Care Association. Lisa's previous episodes HERE Show Notes Watch Full Video Episode Advocacy, Action, and the Future of Right to Repair [RR 857] repairact.com. autocareadvocacy.org Update on NHTSA Letter (00:01:23) Lisa Foshee discusses the recent letter from NHTSA instructing auto manufacturers not to comply with the data access law in Massachusetts, and the response from Senators Warren and Markey. Right to Repair Legislation (00:05:10) The importance of right to repair legislation, including the recently introduced Right to Equitable and Professional Auto Industry Repair (REPAIR) Act, and the need for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to develop cybersecurity standards and guidelines. National Rule or Law on Autonomy (00:08:51) The need for a national rule or law on autonomy, and the role of NHTSA in implementing it. The Letter from NHTSA (00:11:13) Lisa Foshee and the host discuss the recent letter from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) instructing auto manufacturers not to comply with the data access law in Massachusetts. Importance of Right to Repair Legislation (00:12:12) The importance of right to repair legislation and urge listeners to sign the petition for the Repair Act. Thanks to our Partner, NAPA AUTO CARE Learn more about NAPA AUTO CARE and the benefits of being part of the NAPA family by visiting www.NAPAAutoCare.com Connect with the Podcast: -Join our Insider List: https://remarkableresults.biz/insider -All books mentioned on our podcasts: https://remarkableresults.biz/books -Our Classroom page for personal or team learning:

Join Lisa Foshee, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs and General Counsel of the Auto Care Association, and Paul McCarthy, President and CEO of MEMA Aftermarket Suppliers Group, as they discuss the recent update to the law and the challenges that may arise in enforcing it. The recent decision by a federal judge in Massachusetts to allow the law to go into effect is a big step forward for the automotive industry, but there are still some challenges that need to be addressed. They discuss the limitations of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) model for data sharing between Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and independent repair shops and urge listeners to sign the petition at repairact.com and support the Federal Repair Act, also known as HR 906. Lisa and Paul describe the bill as a reasonable and critical solution to ensure vehicle repairability, safety, and cybersecurity. They stress the need for unified and passionate support from the industry to push Congress to take affirmative action and pass the bill. Paul McCarthy, President and CEO of MEMA Aftermarket Suppliers Group. Find Paul's other episodes HERE. Lisa Foshee, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs and General Counsel of the Auto Care Association Show Notes Update on Right to Repair legislation (00:01:50) Enforcement of the law (00:03:15) The judge denied the request for an injunction, and the law is now in effect and can be enforced. However, the attorney general's office has no immediate plans to enforce the law, which may require private lawsuits by consumers or owners of vehicles to go out and enforce the law. Challenges in complying with the law (00:04:40) The OE's view is that the law is impossible to implement, and therefore they can't comply with it. The aftermarket has a different view and demonstrated to the judge in the trial that there were multiple ways to accomplish what the law requires. Supporting Right to Repair (00:06:12) Encouragement to support Right to Repair legislation by completing a form on autocareadvocacy.org Importance of Right to Repair (00:07:35) Discussion of the importance of Right to Repair legislation for free market competition and consumer choice, and the need for people to let their congressperson know that it matters to them. Maine Right to Repair Initiative (00:11:36) Democracy Win in Massachusetts (00:12:51) Paul McCarthy discusses the recent decision in Massachusetts as a win for democracy, as consumers voted overwhelmingly for the Right to Repair law. Monetization of data (00:17:10) The OES's desire to make money off of data and the fear of losing revenue streams. The Reasonable Bill (00:20:20) The Repair Act is a reasonable bill that seeks to ensure safety and cybersecurity in vehicle repairability. It is something the whole industry should support. Action Timebound (00:22:05) It is critical to show unified and passionate support for the Federal Repair Act by signing the petition on repairact.com. The goal is to have a public hearing by the end of summer or early fall. Thanks to our Partner, NAPA AUTO CARE Learn more about NAPA AUTO CARE and the benefits of being part of the NAPA family by visiting www.NAPAAutoCare.com

In this episode, Jared Flinn brings on Ken Clinchy, Vice President of Digital of FleetPride. Ken talks about who FleetPride is, what they offer, and many other topics such as the Right to Repair Act and why they stand for it. FleetPride has been gracious enough to give our listeners 15% off when you order on their website, use ONLINE15 when you checkout.   Check them out here: https://www.fleetpride.com/parts   Get Involved in the Repair Act here: https://www.repairact.com/   Watch on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOo9IuXfWzQvsrGcsmYPeyw     Check out our companies: BulkLoads - https://www.bulkloads.com/ Bulk Insurance Group - https://www.bulkinsurancegroup.com/ Smart Freight Funding - https://www.smartfreightfunding.com/

On Record with Rob Merwin with an update to the Right to Repair Act in 2023 and a recent John Deere agreement. Rob Merwin, Publisher, Aftermarket Matters. Rob's previous episodes HERE Watch Full Video Episode HERE Show Notes:   Right to Repair legislation- consumer issue New Congress- best chance for 2023 and 2024 to get national Right to Repair legislation passed Repairact.com  70% of vehicles are out of warranty OE's want to control the parts and parts distribution John Deer agreement- sharing repair information, nonbinding, why now? NASTF- working with OEM Thanks to our Partner Dorman Products. Dorman gives people greater freedom to fix vehicles by constantly developing new repair solutions that put owners and technicians first. Take the Dorman Virtual Tour at www.DormanProducts.com/Tour Connect with the Podcast: Aftermarket Radio Network Subscribe on YouTube Visit us on the Web Follow on Facebook Become an Insider Buy me a coffee Important Books Check out today's partner:

U.S. Rep. John Garamendi (CA-3) recently introduced H.R. 8033, the Bridge Corrosion Prevention and Repair Act, to the U.S. House of Representatives. The legislation requires corrosion planning and the use of qualified and trained professionals on all bridge construction, repair, and maintenance projects throughout the country. As part of our exclusive conversation, Garamendi explains the origins of the bill and the motivations for it; what the path forward could look like; and how AMPP members can get involved to help.

In today's episode, Warren Ingram speaks to car guru and automotive journalist, Francisco Nwamba, on all things related to car purchasing. Warren and Francisco speak about new vs secondhand purchasing, motor plans, most stolen cars, car upkeep, and upcoming car brands to look out for. Topics/ Questions: Are there ways people can buy cars intelligently? Are there insider tips to buy a car responsibly? Do you need to buy a new car? How do we know what cars are in demand in the secondhand market? Polo vs Fortuna: Are these the most stolen/ hijacked car? Is this something I need to consider when buying a car? How does the cost of servicing a secondhand car vs new car work? Does the brand of a car affect the cost of servicing and spare parts? Would you get better secondhand deals on the less common car brands such as a French car? Should you rotate cars with motor plans or is this a sales pitch? What is the “Right to Repair Act”? Motor plans vs services Is there a brand of car in SA that is offering a great car at a great value? Have a question for Warren? Don't forget to voice note your questions through our WhatsApp chat on (+27) 72 934 4218 and you could be featured in one of our episodes. Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more Financial Freedom content: @HonestMoneyPod

I have a question for you, are the OEMs really after the service and repair market? Or do they need us as much as we need them? Can we work together, and will that give us access to important information? Rob Merwin joins me, the publisher at Aftermarket Matters, and brings his intel on the Right to Repair Act and topics he reports on. He has big dreams of everyone working together. Rob Merwin, Publisher, https://www.aftermarketmatters.com/ (Aftermarket Matters) Listen to Rob's previous episodes https://remarkableresults.biz/?s=%22rob+merwin%22 (HERE) Key Talking Points OEMs need the aftermarket but want to choose which independents  Traditionally dealerships relied on aftermarket parts for 20% of their parts for repair service. Now with the supply chain issues, it's now between 30 and 35%. One party cannot exist successfully without the other party.  Has the OEM lost sight of the consumer interests? Shouldn't they be concerned about consumer safety and getting their customer's cars repaired properly and safely?  Are you going to repair or are you going to replace?  People are keeping their cars longer and those cars are going to need more parts going down the road to keep them on the road.  Connect with the Podcast: https://aftermarketradionetwork.com/ (Aftermarket Radio Network) http://youtube.com/carmcapriotto (Subscribe on YouTube) https://remarkableresults.biz/episodes (Visit us on the Web) https://www.facebook.com/RemarkableResultsPodcast (Follow on Facebook) https://remarkableresults.biz/insider/ (Become an Insider) https://www.buymeacoffee.com/carm (Buy me a coffee) https://remarkableresults.biz/books/ (Important Books) Check out today's partner: Visit http://www.NAPAAutoCare.com (www.NAPAAutoCare.com) http://aftermarketradionetwork.com () https://remarkableresultsradio.captivate.fm/listen ()

In this episode of the Growing On Podcast, we are discussion two bills in the Georgia General Assembly; the "Right to Repair Act" and the "Georgia Raw Dairy Act". We breakdown both of the bills and explain what they would mean for Georgia agriculture. 

Senator Jon Tester connected with John Hendricks and Robin Mitchell during the KGEZ Good Morning Show Glacier Bank Community Conversation on Wednesday February 9, 2022 to remark on the Agriculture Right to Repair Act, the Health Care for Burn Pit Veterans Act and the Fair Bridge Inn and give an update on his involvement.

Doug Stephan, host and American Family Farmer, www.eastleighfarm.com begins with news about how the Right to Repair Act is progressing and President Biden's support. 77% of farmers are buying older farm equipment to avoid dealing with unfriendly repairs on new equipment. Next, we meet Del Ficke, www.fickecattle.com del@grazemaster.com who owns and operates Ficke Cattle Company Graze Master Genetics in eastern Nebraska. With more than 35 years of experience as both an agriculturist and cattleman, Del has developed a one-of-a-kind trademarked breed of composite cattle, the Graze Master. Doug and Del discuss at length the roll that soil health plays into making healthy cattle. Finally, Farmer Doug opines about his mission with his podcasts and his farm in 2022.

Host and American Family Farmer, Doug Stephan www.eastleighfarm.com begins with news about The American Food Labeling Act, Senate Bill #2716 and The Right to Repair Act. Next, Doug introduces Matt Caresco. Matt currently runs development and strategic projects for Farmer's Footprint. matt@projectbiome.org https://www.facebook.com/farmersfootprint/ He is a 3rd generation cherry and walnut grower in central CA, Matt's life has revolved around agriculture. Farmer's Footprint is a coalition of farmers, educators, doctors, scientists, and business leaders aiming to expose the human and environmental impacts of chemical farming and offer a path for-ward through regenerative agricultural practices. Finally, Farmer Doug encourages all farmers to get involved with local branches of The American Farmers Union and The National Farmers Union.

Key Talking Points Joe's Garage AAPEX 2021- a playground for the automotive industry with lifts and hands-on engagement  Right to repair- allows for the bidirectional access of data for vehicles in a standardized format. Get the diagnostic information from the vehicle. Lawsuit ensued. A federal bill will push the automotive Right to Repair. It's not the independent vs dealership, it's about equal competition and allowing the consumer to choose Subaru- disabling Starlink system which is now evidence Automakers have 270 lobbyists, the automotive aftermarket has  9 Changing driving habits but the miles driven is still increasing- more dependence on the vehicle, automobility  EV growth- 280 million vehicles in operation, it will take time to shift, EV's still require repairs Ecommerce- expectations have increased, data and business technology has leveled up and activated the industry to improve Don't be afraid of the future http://Repairact.com (Repairact.com) allows email to be sent to your local representative Connect with the show: https://aftermarketradionetwork.com/ (Aftermarket Radio Network) http://youtube.com/carmcapriotto (Subscribe on YouTube) https://remarkableresults.biz/episodes (Visit us on the Web) https://www.facebook.com/RemarkableResultsPodcast (Follow on Facebook) https://remarkableresults.biz/insider/ (Become an Insider) https://www.buymeacoffee.com/carm (Buy me a coffee) https://remarkableresults.biz/books/ (Important Books) Check out today's partners:       This episode is brought to you by AAPEX, the Automotive Aftermarket Products Expo. AAPEX represents the $740 billion global automotive aftermarket industry and has everything you need to stay ahead of the curve.  AAPEX 2021 is in the record books and lived up to presenting leading-technical and business management training from some of the industry's best and brightest. Now set your sights on Las Vegas in 2022. Mark your calendar now … November 1-3, 2022, AAPEX - Now more than ever. This episode is brought to you by Shop-Ware Shop Management. It's time to run your business at its fullest potential with the industry's leading technology. Shop-Ware Shop Management will increase your efficiency with lightning-fast workflows, help your staff capture more sales every day, and create very happy customers who promote your business. Shops running Shop-Ware have More Time and generate More Profit—join them! Schedule a free live demonstration and find out how 30 minutes can transform your shop at https://getshopware.com/carm (getshopware.com/carm) The Panel Bill Hanvey, President and CEO of the Auto Care Association. Bill is engaging the automotive aftermarket to get involved in letting your legislators know the issue about data. Your help is needed to help in amending the right to repair legislation. Learn everything you can about this fight to amend the right to repair legislation. Ownership of Vehicle Telematic Data Must Flow to the Vehicle Owner. Bill leads the strategic direction of The Auto Care Association's 3,000 members and 150,000 companies representing automotive manufacturers, distributors, and service providers. Find Bill's other episodes https://remarkableresults.biz/?s=Bill+Hanvey (HERE). Paul McCarthy, AASA President.Paul has over 23 years of experience in the automotive industry. Prior to joining MEMA, Paul led the Automotive and Industrial Products Strategy Practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). He consulted at dozens of automotive suppliers, eight of the top ten global automakers, and at private equity firms and financial institutions. His past leadership roles include heading PwC Germany's Automotive Strategy advisory practice and leading global forecasting and analysis for a prominent vehicle forecast service, Autofacts. Paul has an MBA from Duke's University's Fuqua School of Business. Find Paul's other episodes...

Patients depend on safety and accuracy of medical equipment. If they're improperly repaired, it could derail a patient's healthcare journey and risk their health and safety.The Right to Repair Act aims to expedite medical device repairs by giving third-party groups access to the original manufacturer's tools and instructions. But if repair organizations aren't held to the same FDA safety standards, patients could see poor outcomes or be misdiagnosed.James Nestel of Simon Hegele Healthcare Solutions gives us a look into the work that repair companies do, and the importance of FDA regulations that hold them to high standards. Also, Erika Hanson Brown, Managing Principal of ONE CANCER PLACE, shares how device accuracy and safety is critical to cancer patient outcomes. Hosts: Terry Wilcox, Executive Director, Patients RisingDr. Robert Goldberg, “Dr. Bob,” Co-Founder and Vice President of the Center for Medicine in the Public InterestKate Pecora, Field Correspondent, Patients RisingGuests:James “Jim” Nestel, CEO, Simon Hegele Healthcare Solutions (Americas, Asia Pacific)Erika Hanson Brown, Managing Principal, ONE CANCER PLACEJohn Linnell, Patient CorrespondentLinks:National Health Issues Survey Results: European-Style Price ControlsWhy There's New Hope for Alzheimer's PatientsComments on ICER's May 5 Draft Evidence Report, “Aducanumab for Alzheimer's Disease: Effectiveness and Value”JAMA: Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy ChildrenNeed help?The successful patient is one who can get what they need when they need it. We all know insurance slows us down, so why not take matters into your own hands? Our Navigator is an online tool that allows you to search a massive network of health-related resources using your zip code so you get local results. Get proactive and become a more successful patient right now at PatientsRisingConcierge.orgHave a question or comment about the show, or want to suggest a show topic or share your story as a patient correspondent?Drop us a line: podcast@patientsrising.orgThe views and opinions expressed herein are those of the guest(s)/ author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of Patients Rising.

Tara Button had an idea of a website and community that put a spotlight on long lasting products and true consumer satisfaction first - and that idea stalked her until she had to create it and launch it for the world to utilize. Her site is Buy Me Once, and it is completely changing not only how consumers find products that are built to last, but how companies are realizing that repair and a warranty are two criteria that are moving up the list for most shoppers. Tara joins Sam to talk about how she saw the need for Buy Me Once, how they changed their business model to now sell directly to consumers, and her advice for building a community around your website. She also gives us a few of her favorite brands featured on Buy Me Once, and how to know when you are really getting quality items.  What You Will Discover This Week: In a world of paid reviews and wanting everything quickly on demand, it can get confusing to know where to shop and what products will last the test of time. Tara talks about why products are meant to break physically along with stylewise, and how it is time for that to change.  What Buy Me Once is, and Tara knew there was nothing of it's kind and greatly needed in the consumer world.  The less we have to buy things, the more we save money for ourselves and keep our environment clean.  What Tara thinks the future is for the Right to Repair Act and companies including life cycle labeling and more transparency about how long their products really will last.  Why Tara decided to change the business model of Buy Me Once from affiliate marketing to selling directly out of their warehouse. Some of her favorite brands and recommendations both in and beyond Buy Me Once.   Who to really seek honest reviews from instead of basing everything off Amazon.  Mentioned: https://buymeonce.com/ (Buy Me Once ) https://www.lecreuset.com/ (Le Creuset )