Podcasts about gerd m

On this week's episode, host Caryn Antonini is joined by Gerd Müller-Pfeiffer, CEO of International Coffee Consulting in Berlin, Germany. Gerd is an internationally renown coffee consultant with over two decades of experience in shaping the global coffee industry. Gerd brings a deep understanding to the field and advises multinational brands, top tier roasters and boutique cafes in mastering the complexity of the global coffee landscape, in an ever changing industry. Before turning to consulting, Gerd worked with Kraft Foods and Nestlé for 22 years. He's currently a global keynote speaker, a member of the Specialty Coffee Association and Deutscher Kaffeeverbrand. For more information on our guest:Consulting for coffee companiesmueller-pfeiffer.com | Caryn Antoniniwww.cultivatedbycaryn.com@carynantonini@cultivatedbycarynshow###Get great recipes from Caryn at https://carynantonini.com/recipes/

Drei Bayern-Legenden, ein Tisch - und unzählige Erinnerungen: Sepp Maier, Paul Breitner und Franz „Bulle“ Roth sprechen über ihre gemeinsame Zeit beim Rekordmeister. Von spartanischen Trainingslagern über legendäre Trainer bis zu kultigen Spitznamen - diese Folge steckt voller Geschichten, die so nur der Fußball schreibt. Mit viel Witz, großer Wertschätzung und bewegenden Momenten geht es auch um Persönlichkeiten wie Franz Beckenbauer und Gerd Müller - und darum, was der FC Bayern bedeutet. Ein Muss für alle, die den Verein lieben - und wissen wollen, wie alles begann. Viel Spaß!

Following the Icons magazine, lovingly detailing 60 of the game's greatest names, we decided to delve a little deeper into some of them in this podcast series. Der Bomber, Gerd Müller, a goalscorer so natural and so prolific that, in the end, you didn't count his goals, you just weighed them. Dave Bowler and Rob Fletcher turn the clock back to the 70s and his dominance of the game.

In March 1975, West Germany – the newly crowned world champions – came to London's Wembley Stadium for a friendly against England.Among the German squad was a 28-year-old striker who'd already attracted a lot of attention from the British media: not because he'd been hailed as the new Gerd Müller, Germany's legendary goal scorer, but because of the colour of his skin.Erwin Kostedde was the son of a white German mother and a black US soldier, and he had been on the receiving end of racism for most of his life – even during what he considered to be the best years of his career, at Kickers Offenbach. He talks to Kristine Pommert about how racist taunts from supporters and even fellow players affected his game – and how he feels about being a trailblazer for young black players today. A CTVC production for the BBC World Service. Eye-witness accounts brought to life by archive and testimony. Sporting Witness is for those fascinated by sporting history. We take you to the events that have shaped the sports world through the eyes of the people who were there. For nine minutes, you become a fan in the stands as we take you back in time to examine memorable victories and agonising defeats from all over the world. You'll hear from people who have achieved sporting immortality, or those who were there as incredible sporting moments unfolded.Recent episodes explore the forgotten football Women's World Cup, the plasterer who fought a boxing legend, international football's biggest ever beating and the man who swam the Amazon river. We look at the lives of some of the most famous F1 drivers, tennis players and athletes as well as people who've had ground-breaking impact in their chosen sporting field, including: the most decorated Paralympian, the woman who was the number 1 squash player in the world for nine years, and the first figure skater to wear a hijab. You can learn all about fascinating and surprising stories, such as the tennis player who escaped the Nazis, how a man finally beat a horse in a race, and how the FIFA computer game was created.

Bienvenue dans Radio Foot avec au sommaire aujourd'hui : - 68è Ballon d'Or, un lauréat qui fait parler ! ; - Ballon d'Or suite, déception pour l'Afrique. ; - Premier League, clap de fin pour Ten Hag. - 68è Ballon d'Or, un lauréat qui fait parler ! Rodri couronné, le milieu espagnol préféré par les votants à des joueurs du Real qui semblaient tenir la corde, dont Vinicius Jr. Le Graal a finalement échappé à l'ailier brésilien de la Casa Blanca, vainqueur de la C1 et artificier du club ! Qu'est-ce qui lui a manqué ? « Vini » 2è, Bellingham et Carvajal 3è et 4è, mais la délégation des Merengue n'a pas fait le voyage à Paris. Les Blancos ont quand même été primés 3 fois (meilleur club, meilleur entraîneur, trophée Gerd Müller). - Rodri, joueur d'équipe sobre et discret, rouage essentiel d'un collectif, à City comme en sélection. - Un triomphe pour l'Espagne. Lamine Yamal meilleur jeune, primé avec Barcelone. Aitana Bonmati conserve la Ligue des Champions avec le Barça féminin, garde son titre, et poursuit son chemin vers les sommets. Jennifer Hermoso, récompensée. L'attaquante de Monterrey, 1ère femme lauréate du prix Socrates devenue, malgré elle, une figure de la lutte pour les droits des femmes.- Ballon d'Or suite, déception pour l'Afrique. Ademola Lookman, finaliste de la CAN et triple buteur en finale de C3 avec l'Atalanta, termine à la 14è place. V. Osimhen avait porté les espoirs continentaux l'an passé. Cette fois, Salah, Mané ou encore Mahrez ne figuraient pas dans les liste des 30 finalistes. Contrairement à la Zambienne Barbra Banda (12è) et à la Malawite Tabitha Chawinga (16è).- Premier League, clap de fin pour Ten Hag. L'ex-coach de l'Ajax a fait les frais du revers des Red Devils à West Ham dimanche, Manchester United végète à la 14è place du classement, un ancien de la maison prend l'intérim, Ruud Van Nistelroy peut-il faire mieux que son compatriote ?Sophiane Amazian s'entretient avec Philippe Doucet, Nabil Djellit et Jacky Bonnevay. - Technique/réalisation : Laurent Salerno - David Fintzel/Pierre Guérin.

Bienvenue dans Radio Foot avec au sommaire aujourd'hui : - 68è Ballon d'Or, un lauréat qui fait parler ! ; - Ballon d'Or suite, déception pour l'Afrique. ; - Premier League, clap de fin pour Ten Hag. - 68è Ballon d'Or, un lauréat qui fait parler ! Rodri couronné, le milieu espagnol préféré par les votants à des joueurs du Real qui semblaient tenir la corde, dont Vinicius Jr. Le Graal a finalement échappé à l'ailier brésilien de la Casa Blanca, vainqueur de la C1 et artificier du club ! Qu'est-ce qui lui a manqué ? « Vini » 2è, Bellingham et Carvajal 3è et 4è, mais la délégation des Merengue n'a pas fait le voyage à Paris. Les Blancos ont quand même été primés 3 fois (meilleur club, meilleur entraîneur, trophée Gerd Müller). - Rodri, joueur d'équipe sobre et discret, rouage essentiel d'un collectif, à City comme en sélection. - Un triomphe pour l'Espagne. Lamine Yamal meilleur jeune, primé avec Barcelone. Aitana Bonmati conserve la Ligue des Champions avec le Barça féminin, garde son titre, et poursuit son chemin vers les sommets. Jennifer Hermoso, récompensée. L'attaquante de Monterrey, 1ère femme lauréate du prix Socrates devenue, malgré elle, une figure de la lutte pour les droits des femmes.- Ballon d'Or suite, déception pour l'Afrique. Ademola Lookman, finaliste de la CAN et triple buteur en finale de C3 avec l'Atalanta, termine à la 14è place. V. Osimhen avait porté les espoirs continentaux l'an passé. Cette fois, Salah, Mané ou encore Mahrez ne figuraient pas dans les liste des 30 finalistes. Contrairement à la Zambienne Barbra Banda (12è) et à la Malawite Tabitha Chawinga (16è).- Premier League, clap de fin pour Ten Hag. L'ex-coach de l'Ajax a fait les frais du revers des Red Devils à West Ham dimanche, Manchester United végète à la 14è place du classement, un ancien de la maison prend l'intérim, Ruud Van Nistelroy peut-il faire mieux que son compatriote ?Sophiane Amazian s'entretient avec Philippe Doucet, Nabil Djellit et Jacky Bonnevay. - Technique/réalisation : Laurent Salerno - David Fintzel/Pierre Guérin.

We've still got Euro fever as we look at the 1972 and 1976 finals and Germany's peak and trough when it comes to European glory. We cover so much in this episode; comparing Emile Heskey to Gerd Müller, the "Brazilians of Europe" and of course, Antonin Panenka! This is The Final Countdown. A podcast dedicated to all the great finals from the annals of football.Each week your hosts, Adam and Lewis, will do a deep dive (with a generous helping of nostalgia and humour) into one of the greats.

Wed, 07 Aug 2024 17:10:00 +0000 https://fcsp-hamburg-vds-millernton-nds.podigee.io/662-fc_st_pauli_mtmeetsbl_fc_bayern_muenchen 201a549c2a1f06435d513647ec56cf1d Gast: Georg Haas Endlich ist es soweit - der FC St. Pauli ist zurück in der Bundesliga und wir blicken auf die kommende Saison. Heute: FC Bayern München. (Titelbild im Blog: Stefan Groenveld; Design: Arnulf Urban) In diesem Sommer spreche ich mit 17 Fans von Bundesligisten, mit dem Team des VdS/NdS über den magischen FCSP sowie mit unserem Taktik-Experten Tim. Für das Gespräch über den Rekordmeister ist Georg Haas von MiaSanRot zu Gast. Nach einer kurzen Vorstellung blicken wir auf die aus Sicht des FCSP eher unrühmliche letzte Begegnung. Anschließend schauen wir auf viele Titel der Bayern, die Person Uli Hoeneß und mehrere Versuche des Rückzugs entscheidender Personen. Dann blicken wir nach München und die besondere Situation, dass es auch dort zwei (große) Vereine gibt. Als Exilfan blickt Georg mit uns auf die Stadt, in der sein Lieblingsverein zu Hause ist. Wir fragen uns, ob die Stadt nun blau oder rot ist und welchen Stellenwert der FC Bayern München als Marke auch über seine Heimat hinaus hat. Nach einem mehr oder weniger kurzen Exkurs zum TSV 1860 München streifen wir wirklich etwas durch die Stadt und bekommen ein paar Hotspots erklärt, darunter den im weiteren Verlauf der Unterhaltung angesprochenen Hirschgarten. Schließlich kommen wir auch beim Stadion an. Im Gästeblock war Georg zwar noch nicht, kann uns aber trotzdem einige Hinweise zur Anreise geben. Ob es einen Shuttlebus gibt, müsst ihr kurz vorm Spieltag noch einmal selbst nachschauen. Anschauen könnt ihr euch übrigens auch die Statue von Gerd Müller. Wir sprechen noch kurz über die Gastronomie und freuen uns, dass es die Arena Card nicht mehr gibt. Ein paar Hinweise für Gästefans gibt es hier. Zum Abschluss weist Georg uns noch auf einige "Luxusbaustellen" hin und gibt dem FC Bayern München ein wichtiges Gepäckstück samt Inhalt mit. Viel Spaß beim Hören! Schon morgen zur besten Uhrzeit gibt es eine neue Folge! // Yannick 662 full Gast: Georg Haas no FCSP,FCB,FC St. Pauli,FC Bayern München,Bundesliga,MillernTon meets Bundesliga,MillernTon,Podcast,Fußball Yannick Pohl

Presa internațională a reacționat imediat după realegerea Ursulei von der Leyen pentru un nou mandat la conducerea Comisiei Europene. O criză evitată, o răsuflare de ușurare în capitalele europene, spun comentatorii. Ei vorbesc și despre prioritățile asumate în următorii cinci ani. ”Jucătorii de fotbal au tot felul de ritualuri pentru a-și asigura succesul: Gerd Müller a purtat întotdeauna pantofi mai mari, Mario Gomez nu și-a schimbat niciodată apărătorile pentru tibie. Ursula von der Leyen s-a bazat, de asemenea, pe articole de îmbrăcăminte testate în numeroase rânduri, atunci când a fost realeasă în funcția de președinte al Comisiei”, remarcă Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.Potrivit unui comentariu al Reuters, realegerea lui Von der Leyen asigură continuitate în instituția cheie a Uniunii Europene într-un moment al provocărilor externe și interne - inclusiv sprijinul crescând pentru partidele politice de extremă dreapta și eurosceptice.Pentru Irish Examiner, ”confirmarea ei pentru un nou mandat vine ca o ușurare pentru multe capitale ale UE, care au căutat continuitate la Bruxelles, pe fondul incertitudinii politice din unele state membre, războiului în curs din Ucraina și îngrijorărilor cu privire la posibilul impact al viitoarelor alegeri din SUA. .Dar doamna von der Leyen a fost, de asemenea, criticată din unele părți ale spectrului politic.Unii politicieni au susținut că angajamentul ei față de acordul verde și față de apărarea standardelor statului de drept a fost inconsecvent, dar și că relațiile cu țările terțe în ceea ce privește politica de migrație nu prevăd suficiente garanții pentru drepturile omului. Alții, în special cei din extrema dreaptă, o consideră ca fiind prea centristă, criticând-o pentru acordul verde și alte politici de bază”.Însă, după cum comentează Euronews, ”respingerea candidatului preferat al liderilor UE ar fi fost fără precedent. Diplomați, vorbind sub rezerva anonimatului, au spus că ar constitui o „criză instituțională” fără o ieșire ușoară, din cauza lipsei de alternative credibile.Mediul global volatil, inclusiv războaiele din Ucraina și Gaza, i-au conferit argumente pentru continuitate”.Conform Polskie Radio, postul public de la Varșovia, ”Ursula von der Leyen a subliniat concentrarea UE pe consolidarea securității colective cu inițiative precum Scutul European, contracararea manipulării energetice a lui Putin cu investiții în surse regenerabile, lansarea unui plan de industrie curată și prioritizarea obiectivelor climatice, reformelor administrative, îmbunătățirea securității la frontieră, sprijinul agricol și democratic”.Iar Le Figaro remarcă faptul că șefa Comisiei Europene ”s-a angajat să consolideze Frontex, agenția UE responsabilă de frontiere și să tripleze numărul de personal la granițe și pe coaste. Au fost angajamente făcute PPE, dar și grupului de extremă dreapta ECR asociat liderului italian Giorgia Meloni.De altfel, Ursula von der Leyen a propus un comisar responsabil de „spațiul mediteranean” de natură să mulțumească Roma. Ea nu a neglijat posibila susținere a unora dintre cei 78 de aleși ECR, chiar dacă orice cooperare asumată rămâne o linie roșie pentru liberali , socialiști și verzi.În schimb, cealaltă grupare de extremă dreaptă, Patrioții pentru Europa, care reunește Reuniunea Națională  din Franța și Fidesz din Ungaria cu poziții reticente în a sprijini Ucraina, rămâne exclusă din orice majoritate”.

Send us a Text Message.Dive into the inspirational journey of one of football's greatest legends in our latest episode of the Soccer Bedtime Series. Titled "Euro 2024 Icons: The Triumph of Robert Lewandowski," this episode chronicles the incredible transformation of Robert Lewandowski from a rebellious child to a football superstar.Explore the heartwarming story of how the early loss of his father became a turning point in Robert's life, driving him to honor his father's memory by excelling in football. Follow his rise from local clubs in Warsaw to the global stage, where he shattered records and became a national hero for Poland.Witness Lewandowski's unforgettable performances, including his historic five-goal feat against Wolfsburg and his record-breaking 41-goal Bundesliga season, surpassing Gerd Müller's long-standing record. Learn about his leadership and pivotal role in guiding Poland to their best-ever performance at Euro 2016.Perfect for young football fans and aspiring athletes, "Euro 2024 Icons: The Triumph of Robert Lewandowski" is a tale of resilience, dedication, and the power of dreams. Join us in celebrating the legacy of a true football icon in this captivating bedtime story.From Lech Poznan to Borussia Dortmund and Bayern Munich, Lewandowski's story inspires everyone. Support the Show.Support the show! Become a member and have access to fan art, new episodes, shout outs, story input, educational resources and the Soccer Bedtime Community. To become a Soccer Bedtime Stories Member Visit us at Buzzsprout!We would love to hear from you and connect with other soccer/football lovers from around the world! Leave a comment, email or find us on social media.Find us on Instagram: MySoccerBedtimeFind us on Facebook: SoccerBedtimeStoriesAlso excited to launch our first story coloring pages, you can find them at: The Soccer Teacher by Soccer Bedtime Stories

Dotun and Tim welcome Dr Alexander Gross onto the show to discuss the game that knocked England out of the 1970 World Cup. This show was originally recorded to pay tribute to the late great Gerd Müller in August 2021. SUBSCRIBE TO BRAZILIAN SHIRT NAME EXTRA FOR EARLY ACCESS AND NO ADS:https://brazilian-shirt-name.hubwave.net/FOLLOW THE BRAZILIAN SHIRT NAME ON INSTAGRAM:https://www.instagram.com/brazilshirtpod/FOLLOW THE BRAZILIAN SHIRT NAME ON FACEBOOK:https://www.facebook.com/BrazilShirtPodFOLLOW THE BRAZILIAN SHIRT NAME ON TWITTER:https://twitter.com/BrazilShirtPodPURCHASE DOTUN'S LATEST BOOK, EFFRIES HERE: https://amzn.to/4cM260f

Pour ce nouveau numéro, Christophe Pélissier, l'actuel coach de l'AJ Auxerre, passé auparavant par le banc de Lorient et Amiens, se confie au micro de Darren Tulett pour raconter les 5 matchs qui ont marqué sa vie !Match 1. On est le 12 mai 1976 au stade de Hampden Park, à Glasgow. L'AS Saint-Etienne affronte le grand Bayern Munich de Beckenbauer, Gerd Müller, Rummenigge et Uli Hoeness en finale de la C1 ! Et Christophe Pélissier, âgé de 10 ans, est au stade !  Match 2. Le 8 juillet 1982 à Séville. Demi-finale de la Coupe du Monde. France 3-3 RFA. Puis la défaite aux tab... Le match qui a marqué toute une génération. Match 3. Le 12 juillet 1998 pour la victoire des Bleus en finale de la Coupe du Monde face au Brésil !  Match 4. Le 19 mai 2017 et Amiens, le club que Christophe entraines désormais, va jouer un match à Reims. Il faut une victoire pour monter en Ligue 1 pour la première fois dans l'histoire d'Amiens ! Grâce à un but à la dernière seconde, les Picards montent dans l'élite !  Match 5. C'est justement ce premier match pour Amiens, et pour Christophe Pélissier, en Ligue 1 : le 5 août 2017 et ça se passe au Parc des Princes, contre le PSG. Baptême du feu, soldé par une défaite face au futur champion de France.Tous les mardis, Darren Tulett reçoit un invité qui raconte les cinq matchs de football qui ont le plus marqué sa vie. À travers ces rencontres, notre invité parle de son amour pour ce sport et se confie ainsi sur quelques chapitres de sa vie. Raffolez-vous des anecdotes racontées par des anciens joueurs, mais aussi des humoristes, chanteurs, comédiens, journalistes, politiciens... Bref, tous ceux qui aiment le foot risquent de se retrouver sur la liste éclectique de notre hôte anglais ! 

In dieser Sonderepisode des Fever Pit'ch Podcasts sprechen Pit Gottschalk und Malte Asmus mit Javier Cáceres von der Süddeutschen Zeitung über sein Buch 'Tore wie gemalt'. Eine großartige Erinnerung an die wichtigsten Tore der Fußballgeschichte. Das Buch, im Suhrkamp-Verlag erschienen, enthält 130 Zeichnungen von Fußballspielern, die ihr schönstes und wichtigstes Tor gemalt haben. Javier Caceres erzählt, wie er auf die Idee zu dem Buch kam und wie er es geschafft hat, prominente Fußballer dazu zu bringen, ihre Tore für ihn zu zeichnen. Im Buch vertreten ist das Who is Who der Fußballwelt: Mario Götzem Rudi Völler, Alfredo di Stefano, Lothar Matthäus, Xabi Alonso, Pelé uvm. Javier Cáceres erzählt aber auch, wer sich geziert hat, nicht malen wollte. Und er teilt mit unseren Moderatoren lustige und interessante Anekdoten von den malerischen Ausflügen von Franz Beckenbauer, Gerd Müller und vielen mehr. Chapters00:00:00 Einführung und Vorstellung Gast und Buch 00:02:09 Die Entstehung des Buches 'Tore wie gemalt' 00:05:50 Warum Michel Platini nicht gezeichnet hat 00:08:20 Wie schwierig war es, die Stars zu überreden? 00:12:16 Der Block, in dem alle Zeichnungen verewigt sind, war auf jeder Dienstreise dabei 00:24:00 Brauchte es die Erlaubnis der Fußballer für die Veröffentlichung? 00:25:11 Warum Diego Maradona nicht im Buch verewigt wurde 00:28:11 Ein Post von Markus Merk 00:29:20 Empfelung und Verabschiedung

Tempelfunk-DER Sportpodcast zwischen Spree und Rhein Folge: 39 Gast: Bernd Gersdorff (Ex-Fussballprofi) „Ändere Deine Richtung, sonst endet Deine Reise dort, wo Dich der Weg hinführt“ (unbekannt/ Gersdorff) Mein heutiger Gast spielte (u.a.) mit Franz Beckenbauer, Gerd Müller, Sepp Maier, George Best und Colin Bell zusammen. Sprich: Den besten Spielern ihrer Zeit! Hans „Hänschen“ Rosenthal war nicht nur einer der beliebtesten Showmaster Deutschlands, sondern als Präsident -und zeitweise auch Trainer- von Tennis-Borussia Berlin, maßgeblich am Start seiner Bundesligakarriere und Transfer zu Eintracht Braunschweig verantwortlich. Dem „Deutschen Meister 1967“ verlieh er zwar „keine Flügel“, dafür bekam er aber den Hirschkopf mit 56 Kräutern aufs Trikot und erlebte Bundesliga-Vermarktungs-Geschichte live mit. Dem Hirsch entwachsen, wechselte er, obwohl es eigentlich zu 1860 München gehen sollte, zur vielleicht besten Bayern-Mannschaft aller Zeiten. Nach nur zwölf Spielen als Stammspieler verließ er den späteren Rekordmeister, trotz Warnung von Robert Schwan (damaliger Manager FC Bayern München), und tauschte Isar wieder gegen Oker ein. Nach weiteren erfolgreichen Jahren in der Löwenstadt, erinnerte er sich wieder an seinen „Berlin-Status“ (welchen er nicht nur aufgrund Herkunft und Liebe zur besagten Stadt aufrecht hielt! :-)) und wechselte zu Hertha BSC Berlin. Nach 300 Bundesligaspielen ging es dann von WEST-Berlin in die Hügellandschaft des Silicon Valley. Nach Stationen bei den San José Earthquakes & San Diego Sockers beendete er seine Profikarriere und landete Dank einer Empfehlung von Uwe Seeler bei Adidas. Dort erwies sich der aktuelle Präsident des FC Bayern München, Herbert Hainer, als großer Förderer des gebürtigen Berliners. Beeindruckt von der Persönlichkeit und Durchsetzungsfähigkeit Gersdorffs, erinnerte sich 1996 -das damalige Hertha BSC Berlin Aufsichtsratmitglied Robert Schwan- an ihn und versuchte Gersdorff als Manager für den Hauptstadt-Klub zu gewinnen. Der Weg von Bernd Gersdorff schlug aber, wieder einmal, eine andere Richtung ein und so blieb er ein „Mann der Wirtschaft“. Wie er fast einmal Präsident von Eintracht Braunschweig wurde und was er zur aktuellen Situation beim ehem. „Jägermeister-Werbeträger“ zu sagen hat, wie er die handelnden Personen um Präsidentin Kumpis bewertet und welchen Braunschweiger Unternehmer er sich in den Aufsichtsrat wünscht….das alles (und natürlich viel, viel mehr!:-)) erfahrt Ihr in meinem aktuellen Interview mit der Bundesliga-Legende Bernd Gersdorff. Gute Unterhaltung! www.tempelfunk.de #Tempelfunk #eintrachtbraunschweig #tennisborussiaberlin #herthabscberlin #sanjose #sandiego #adidas #berlin #salzgitterag #fcbayernmünchen #fcbayern #fcb #hertha #berlin #wirsindeintracht #nurblaugelb #immerblaugelb

Zu Gast beim Vize-Herbstmeister "Der Weihnachtsmann war noch nie der Osterhase!" An diesem Ausspruch des Bayern-Mächtigen Uli Hoeneß müssen sich die Roten aus München heuer hochziehen, denn ihre bröckelnde Dominanz im Bundesligageschäft zeigt sich auch in dieser Saison: Herbstmeister wurden nicht die Bayern, sondern der Bayer aus Leverkusen. Insofern brauchen die Mannen um ihren Rekordballermann Harry Kane Siege, Siege und nochmals Siege, was die Lage für die Elf vom Niederrhein mit ihren großen Leistungsschwankungen an diesem Samstag, den 3.2.2024 nicht leichter machen dürfte. Am 7.1.2024 verstarb mit dem "Kaiser" Franz Beckenbauer nach Gerd Müller, Heinz Flohe und Jürgen Grabowski ein weiteres Mitglied der Weltmeistermannschaft von 1974. Die unvergessenen Weltmeister der Borussia befinden sich allesamt in ihren Siebzigern, leben alle noch und werden mit Sicherheit diesen Bundesliga-Klassiker verfolgen: Wolfgang Kleff, Rainer Bonhof, Berti Vogts, Günter Netzer, Jupp Heynckes und Herbert Wimmer. Und das Spiel? Der VfL wird wieder einmal in Führung gehen, um dann die Zahl der nach Führungen verspielten Punkten in dieser Saison auf 23 zu erhöhen. Was der Stimmung und dem Rückhalt auf den Rängen jedoch keinen Abbruch tut ... Der Musiktipp stammt von der Plattform jamendo.com: + "Legenden" von Too Little Cage [cc by-sa] Viel Spaß beim Hören!

Shownotes and Transcript Intelligent Design may not be an idea you are familiar with but it has interested me since I was a child.  I find it impossible to accept that the world we live in and the complexity of human beings is all based on luck and chance. There has to be an intelligent designer.  Stephen C Meyer is one of the most renowned experts on this very topic and his recent appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience has made many people question the theory of a universe without God.  At what point did intellectuals decide that scientific knowledge conflicts with traditional theistic beliefs? Is it even statistically possible for such complexity to just appear? What about the question of who is this intelligent designer?  Stephen Meyer will help you view the world around you with a brand new perspective. Dr. Stephen C. Meyer received his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in the philosophy of science. A former geophysicist and college professor, he now directs the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle. In 2004, Meyer ignited a firestorm of media and scientific controversy when a biology journal at the Smithsonian Institution published his peer-reviewed scientific article advancing intelligent design. Meyer has been featured on national television and radio programs, including The Joe Rogan Experience, The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, CBS's Sunday Morning, NBC's Nightly News, ABC's World News, Good Morning America, Nightline, FOX News Live, and the Tavis Smiley show on PBS. He has also been featured in two New York Times front-page stories and has garnered attention in other top-national media. Dr. Meyer is author of the New York Times bestseller Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design and Signature in the Cell, a Times Literary Supplement Book of the Year. He is also a co-author of Explore Evolution: The Arguments For and Against Neo-Darwinism and Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique. Connect with Stephen... WEBSITE           https://stephencmeyer.org/                            https://www.discovery.org/                            https://returnofthegodhypothesis.com/ X                         https://x.com/StephenCMeyer?s=20 BOOKS               https://www.amazon.co.uk/stores/author/B001K90CQC Interview recorded 13.12.23 Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            https://heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        https://heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ TRANSCRIPTS   https://heartsofoak.substack.com/ Support Hearts of Oak by purchasing one of our fancy T-Shirts....  SHOP                  https://heartsofoak.org/shop/ *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin and Twitter https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20  Transcript (Hearts of Oak) Dr. Stephen Meyer. It's wonderful to have you with us. Thank you so much for your time today. (Stephen C Meyer) Thanks for inviting me, Peter.  No, it's great to have you. And people can find you on Twitter @StephenCMayer. It's on the screen there. And also discovery.org, the Discovery Institute. And you obviously received your PhD in philosophy of sciences from England, from University of Cambridge, your a former geophysicist, college professor, and you now are the director of Discovery Institute, author of many books. The latest is Return of the God Hypothesis, Three Scientific Discoveries That Reveal the Mind Behind the Universe, and the links for those books will be in the description. But, Dr. Meyer, if I can maybe, I think I remember as a child, church loyalty, being at church and getting a stamp for attending. I remember asking for a book on creationism then, and we may touch on different creationism, intelligent design. I mean, it was 10 or 11. And I remember being fascinated by this whole topic of how God can be seen in the world around us. Maybe I can ask you about your journey. What has been your journey to being one of the, I guess, main proponents on intelligent design? Well, I've always been interested in questions at the intersection between science and philosophy or science and  larger worldview questions or science and religion the questions that are addressed about, you know, how do we get here and what is, is there a particular significance to human life, what is the meaning of life, in the early part of my scientific career I was working as a geophysicist as you mentioned the introduction and in the city where I was working, a conference came to town that was investigating that intersection of science and philosophy, science and belief, and it was addressing three big questions, and they were the origin of the universe, the origin of life, and the origin and nature of human consciousness. And the conference was unique in that it had invited leading scientists and philosophers representing both theism, broadly speaking, belief in God, and scientists and philosophers who rejected theism and who affirmed the more common view among leading scientists at that time, which was materialism or sometimes called naturalism. We have the New Atheist Movement with their scientific atheists and people of more of that persuasion. So it was, let's look at the origin of the universe from the standpoint. What do the data say, what do you theists say about it, what do you non-theist materialists say about it, and it was a fascinating conference and I was particularly taken by the panels on the origin of the universe and the origin of life because surprisingly to me it seemed that the theists had the intellectual initiative that the the evidence in those about the origin of the universe, and then about the complexity of the cell and therefore the challenges it posed to standard chemical evolutionary theories of the origin of life that in both these two areas, both these two subjects, it seemed that there were powerful, theistic friendly arguments being developed, in one case about the, what you might call, a reviving of the ancient cosmological argument because of the evidence that scientists had discovered about the universe having a beginning. And in the other case, what we now call the theory of intelligent design, that there was evidence of design in the cell, in particular, in the digital code that is stored in the DNA molecule, the information and information processing system of the cell. And was it that time? And still to this day is something that undirected theories of chemical evolution have not been able to explain. And instead, what we know from our experience is that information is a mind product, which is a point that some of these scientists made at this panel, that when we see digital code or alphabetic text or computer code, and many people have likened the information and DNA to a computer code, we always find a mind behind that. So this was the first time I was exposed to that way of thinking. I got fascinated with that. A year later, after the conference, I ended up meeting one of the scientists on the Origin of Life panel, a man named Charles Thackston, who had just written a book with two other co-authors called The Mystery of Life's Origin. He was detailing in that book, he and his colleagues were detailing sort of chapter and verse the problems with trying to explain the origin of the first cell from simpler chemicals in some alleged or presupposed prebiotic soup. And the three authors showed that this was implausible in the extreme, given what we know scientifically about how chemistry works versus how cells work. And over the ensuing year, he kind of mentored me and I got fascinated with the subject and ended up getting a fellowship. A Rotary Fellowship to study at Cambridge for a year and then ended up extending on. I did my master's thesis and then my PhD thesis both on origin of life biology within the History and Philosophy of Science Department at Cambridge. And while I was there, I started to meet other scientists and scholars who were having doubts about standard Darwinian and chemical evolutionary theories of life's origin. And by the early 90s, a number of us had met each other and connected and had some private conferences. And out of that was born a formal program investigating the evidence for intelligent design in biology, in physics, in cosmology, and in 96, we started a program at Discovery Institute. You were very kind to me to call me the director of the whole institute. I direct a program within the institute called the Center for Science and Culture, which is the institutional home. A network of scientists who are investigating whether or not there is, empirical scientific evidence for a designing mind behind life in the cosmos and and the program just continues to grow, the network especially continues to grow, we've got fantastic scientists from all around the world now who are sympathetic to that position and I would mention too that it's a position that's kind of reviving an ancient view going back to certainly the time of the scientific revolution. In particular, we've discovered back to the scientific revolution in Cambridge where I had been fortunate enough to study. There's a, in the college that I was part of, St. Catherine's, there was back in the 17th century, one of the founders of modern botany, who was also one of the first authors of what's called British National Theology. His name was John Ray. Ray was the tutor of Isaac Barrow, a mathematician who in turn tutored Newton and so this whole tradition of seeing the fingerprints of a creator in the natural world is something that was launched in Britain, particularly in Cambridge there were other figures like Robert Boyle who were in other places but the Cambridge tradition of natural theology was very strong from that time period in the 17th century, late 17th century, right up to figures like James Clerk Maxwell, the great physicist in the late 19th century who was critical, sceptical of Darwinism and articulated the idea of design. And I think that's now being revived within contemporary science. There's a growing minority of scientists who see evidence of design in nature.  Now, the understanding of intelligent designer, that's a new thinking, but through the millennia, that's been the norm. Individuals have viewed the world through the lens that there is a God, and that has helped them understand and see the world. But there must have been a point, I guess, when intellectuals decided that scientific knowledge conflicts with that that traditional belief, that traditional theistic belief. Yeah, that's a great way of framing the discussion, Peter. There's a historian of science in Britain named Steve Fuller, who's at Warwick. And he's argued that the idea of intelligent design has been the framework out of which science has been done since the period of the scientific revolution at least and that the the post Darwinian deviation from that, denying that there's actual design and only instead as the Darwinian biologists say the appearance or illusion of design, you may remember from Richard Dawkins's famous book the blind watchmaker, page one he says biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose. And of course, for Dawkins and his followers, and for Darwinians from the late 19th century forward, the appearance of design is an illusion. And it was thought to be an illusion because Darwin had formulated an undirected, or had identified an undirected, unguided process, which he called natural selection that could mimic the powers of a designing intelligence, or so he argued, without itself being designed or guided in any way. And that's kind of where we've engaged the argument. Is that appearance of design that nearly all biologists recognize merely an appearance, or is it the product of an actual guiding intelligence? And that's why we call our theory intelligent design. We're not challenging the idea that there has been change over time, one of the other meanings of evolution we're not challenging even the idea of universal common descent though some of us myself included are quite sceptical of that, the main thing we're challenging with the theory of intelligent design is that is that the appearance of design is essentially an illusion because an unguided undirected mechanism has the capability of generating that appearance without itself being guided or directed in any way and that's, to us the key issue. Is the design real or merely apparent? You may remember that Francis Crick also once said that biologists must constantly keep in mind, that what they see was not designed, but instead evolved. So there's this, the recurrence of that strong intuition among people who have studied biological systems. And I would say, going back all the way to Aristotle, you know, this has been, the Western tradition in biology has been suffused with this recognition. That organisms look designed, they look like they're designed for purpose, they exhibit purpose of behaviour. And now in the age following Watson and Crick, following the molecular biological revolution of the late 50s and 1960s and 70s, we have extraordinarily strong appearances of design. We've got digital code. We have a replication system. We have a translation system as part of this whole information processing system. Scientists can't help but use teleological wording to describe what's going on. We see the purpose of nature, of all of the biological systems and subsystems. And so what we've argued is that, at least at the point of the origin of life, there is no unguided, undirected, or there is no theory that invokes, that has identified an unguided, undirected mechanism that can explain away that appearance of design. Many people don't realize that Darwin did not attempt to explain the origin of the first life. He presupposed the existence of one or a few very simple forms. And so he started it effectively with assuming a simple cell and then said, well, what would have come from that? We now know, however, that the simple cell was not simple at all and displays this many very striking appearances of design that have not been explained by undirected chemical evolutionary processes. Dawkins himself has said that the machine code of the genes is strikingly computer-like. And so you have this striking appearance of design at the very foundation of life that has not in any way been explained by undirected processes. Well, I want to pick up on a number of that, the new discoveries, how things have changed, the complexity. But I can go back, you're challenging, I guess, hundreds of years of new thinking that the complexity of the universe simply points to luck and chance. And I guess there's a statistical side of that, whether that's even possible. We look around and we see things just working perfectly. And I wonder whether it's even possible for a chance element to make all those things come together and make the world as it is. Well, in my book, Signature in the Cell, which was the first of the three books that I've written on these big topics, I look at the argument for the chance origin of life and even more fundamentally, the chance origin of, say, DNA and the protein products that the DNA codes for. And one of the first things to take note of in addressing the chance hypothesis is that no serious origin of life researcher, no origin of life biochemist or biologist today reposes much hope in the chance hypothesis, it's it's really been set aside and the reason for that, I explained the reason for that in in signature in the cell and then do some calculations to kind of back up the thinking that most origin of life biologists have adopted and that is that the cell is simply far too complicated to have arisen by chance. And you can, and the large biomacromolecules, DNA and proteins, are molecules that depend on a property known as sequence specificity, or sometimes called specified complexity. That is to say, they contain informational instructions in essentially a digital or typographic form. So you have in the DNA you have the four character chemical subunits that biologists actually represent with the letters A, T, G, and C. And if you want to build a protein, you have to arrange the A's, C's, G's, and T's or the evolutionary process or somehow the A's, C's, G's, and T's must have been sequenced in the proper way so that when that genetic message is sent to the ribosome, which is the the translation apparatus in the cell, then what comes out of that is a properly sequenced protein molecules. Proteins also are made of subunits called amino acids. There are 20 or so, maybe as many as 22 now, protein-forming amino acids. And to get the protein chain that is built from the DNA instructions to fold into a proper functional conformation or three-dimensional shape, those amino acids have to be arranged in very specific ways. If they're not arranged properly, the long peptide chain, as it's called, will not fold into a stable protein. And so in both cases, you have this property of sequence specificity that the function of the whole, the whole gene in the case of DNA or the whole protein in the case of the the amino acids, the function of the whole depends upon the precise sequencing of the constituent parts. And that's the difficulty, getting those things to line up properly. Turns out there's all kinds of difficulties in trying to form those subunits, those chemical parts, out of any kind of prebiotic chemical environment that we've been able to think of. But the most fundamental problem is the sequencing. And so you can actually run, because there's, if you think of the protein chain, you have 1 in 20 roughly chances of getting the right amino acid at each site. Sometimes it's more or less because in some cases you can have any one of, there is some variability allowed at each site, but you can run numbers on all this and get very precise numbers on the probability of generating even a single functional protein in the known history of the universe. And it turns out that what are called the combinatorials or the probabilities associated with combinatorials, the probabilities are so small that they are small even in relation to the total number of possible events that might have occurred from the Big Bang till now. In other words, here's an example I often use to use to illustrate, if you have a thief trying to crack a bike lock. If the thief has enough time, even though the combination is hidden among all the possibilities, and then the probability of getting the combination in one trial is very small, if the thief has enough time and can try and try and try again, he may crack it by sheer chance. But if the lock is, we have a standard four-dial bike lock, but if the thief encounters a 10-dial bike lock, and I've had one rendered by my graphic designer to get the point across, then in a human lifetime, there's not enough opportunities to sample that number of possible combinations. If you've got 10 dials, you've got 10 to the 10 possibilities, or 10, that's 10 billion. And if the thief spins the dial once every 10 seconds for 100 years and does nothing else in his entire life, he'll only sample 3% of those total combinations, which means it's much more likely that the thief will fail than it is that he will succeed by chance alone. And that's the kind of, that's the, so the point is that there are, there are degrees of complexity or improbability that dwarf what we call probabilistic resources, the opportunities. And that's the situation we have when we're talking about the origin of the first biomacromolecules by reference to chance alone. Only it's not just that you would with those events, you know, all the events that have occurred from the beginning of the universe until now could only sample about one, I think I've calculated about one ten trillion trillionth of the total possibilities that correspond to a modest length protein. So it's like the bike thief trying to sample that 10-dial lock, only much, much worse. You know, it turns out that 14 billion years isn't enough time to have a reasonable chance to find informational biomolecules by chance alone. I mean, is the whole scientific argument that removes God, is it just an attempt by science to play God, because whenever we are told that scientific principles break down and no longer exist at the very beginning, for instance, and it doesn't make sense, but we're told that that's just how it happened and you have to accept that. And it seems to be people jumping over themselves with a desperation to try and remove the idea that there is an intelligent designer. Well, I tend to think that the questions of motivation in these debates are kind of a wash. I think as theists, we have to, I'm a theist, okay, I believe in God. In my first two books, I argued for designing intelligence of some kind as being, of some unspecified kind as being the best explanation for the information, for example, in the cell or the information needed to build fundamentally new body plans in the history of life on earth. So, but in my last book, I extend that argument, I bring in evidence from cosmology and physics and suggest that the best explanation for that, the ensemble of evidence that we have about biological and physical and cosmological origins is actually a designing intelligence that has attributes that, for example, Jews and Christians have always described to God, transcendence, as well as intelligence. For example, no being within the cosmos, no space alien, and some scientists have proposed even Crick, Francis Crick in 1981 in a little book called Life Itself floated the idea that yes we do see evidence of design in life. The origin of life is a very hard problem, we can't see how it could possibly have happened on Earth so maybe there was an intelligent life form from space who seeded life here. He was subsequently ridiculed a bit and said, I think he was embarrassed that he'd floated this and said he would not, he foreswore any further speculation on the origin of life problem. It was too difficult, he said. But in any case, back to your question, I think the whole question is. Oh, I was finishing a thought, and that is that the evidence of design that we have from the very beginning of the universe and what's called the fine-tuning of the laws and constants of physics and the initial conditions of the universe, the basic parameters of physics, which were said at the beginning, are exquisitely finely tuned against all odds. And no space alien, no intelligence within the cosmos could be responsible for the evidence of design that we have from the very beginning of the universe because any alleged space alien would itself have had to evolve by some sort of naturalistic processes further down the timeline, once you have stable galaxies and planets and that sort of thing and so no being within the cosmos could be responsible for the conditions that made its future evolution possible nor could a space alien to be responsible for the origin of the universe itself. So when you bring in the cosmological and the physical evidence, I think the only type of designing intelligence that can explain the whole range of evidence we have is one that is transcendent, that is beyond the cosmos, but also active in the creation, because we see evidence of information arising later, and information, as I've mentioned, is a mind product based on our uniform and repeated experience.  But as to the motivation issue, I kind of think it's a wash. I think theists have to acknowledge that all people, including those of us who are theists, have a motivation, maybe a hope that there is a purposeful intelligence behind the cosmos. I think there's a kind of growing angst in young people. Harvard study recently showing that over 50% of young people have doubts about there being any purpose to their existence. And this is contributing to the mental health crisis. And so I think all of us would like, to be possible, for there to be life after death, for there to be an enduring purpose to our lives that does not extinguish when we die or when eventually there's a heat death of the universe. I think theism, belief in God, gives people a sense of purpose in relation, the possibility of a relationship to our creator. That's a positive thing. I think there's also a common human motivation to not want to be accountable to that creator and to have moral, complete moral freedom to decide what we want to do at any given time. And so oftentimes theists or God-believers, religious people will say, well, you just like these materialistic theories of origins because you don't want to be accountable to a higher power. That might be true, But it's equally true that the atheist will often say, well, but you guys just need a cosmic crutch. You need comfort from the idea of a divine being, a loving creator, father, whatever, you know, the divine father figure. And Freud famously critiqued or criticized religious belief in those terms. So I think that those two kind of motivation, arguments about motivation are something of a wash and that what I've tried to do in Return of the God Hypothesis is set all of that aside, look at the evidence that we have, and then evaluate it using some standard methods of scientific reasoning and standard methods of evaluating hypotheses, such as a Bayesian analysis, for example, that come out of logic and philosophy. And set the motivation questions aside. And my conclusion is that the evidence for an intelligent designer of some unspecified kind is extremely strong from biology, and that when you bring in the cosmological and physical evidence, the evidence of fine-tuning and the evidence we have that the material cosmos itself had a beginning, I think materialism fails as an explanation, and you need to invoke an intelligence that is both transcendent and active in the creation to explain the whole range of evidence. Well, let me pick you up on that change, because initially there is a change from someone who believes the evolutionary model, big bang, there is no external force. That step from there to there is an external force, there is intelligent design feeding into the universe we have. And then it's another step to take that to there is an intelligent designer, now there is a personal God. And that step certainly, I assume, is frowned upon in the scientific community. Tell us about you making that step, because it would have been much safer to stay, I guess, in the ID side and not to make the step into who that individual is. Tell us about kind of what prompted you to actually make the step into answering that who question.  Right. Well, I've been thinking about this question for 35, 36, I don't know, since the mid-80s when I was a very young scientist. And it was at the conference that inspired it, because at the conference, there were people already thinking about the God question, especially the cosmologists. At that conference, Alan Sandage announced his conversion from scientific agnosticism he was a scientific materialist to theism and indeed I think he became Christian, and he talked about how the evidence for the singularity at the beginning of the universe, the evidence that the material cosmos itself had a beginning was one of the things that moved him off of that materialistic perspective, that it was clear to him that as he described it, that the evidence we had for a beginning was evidence for what he called a super, with a space in between, natural events, nothing within the cosmos could explain the origin of the cosmos itself, if matter, space, time and energy have a beginning and as best we can tell they do and there are multiple lines of evidence and theoretical considerations that lead to that conclusion and I developed that in return of the god hypothesis, it is the evidence from observational astronomy and also developments in theoretical physics converge on that conclusion. And if that's the case, if matter and energy themselves have a beginning, and indeed if space and time themselves have a beginning, then we can't invoke any materialistic explanation to explain that. Because before there was matter, before the beginning of matter, there was no matter to do the causing. And that's the problem. There must be something. For there to be a causal explanation for the universe, it requires a transcendent something. And when you also consider that we have evidence for design from the very beginning in the fine-tuning of the initial physical parameters of the universe, the initial conditions of the universe, the initial establishment and fine-tuning of the physical laws, then you have evidence for that transcendent something being a transcendent intelligent something. And if something is intelligent, capable of making choices between one outcome or another, that's really what we mean by personhood. I mean, this is very close to a, the idea of a personal gun, now that entity may not want to have anything to do with us, but we're talking about a conscious agent when we talk about evidence for intelligent design, and then we have further evidence I think in biology with the presence of the information and information processing system inside cells. And so when you bring all that together, I think you can start to address the who question. So after I wrote Signature in the Cell and Darwin's Doubt, a lot of my readers were asking, OK, that's great. We have evidence of a designing intelligence, but who would that intelligence have been? Is it a space alien, something imminent within the cosmos, like Crick and others have proposed? Or is it a transcendent intelligence? And what can science tell us about that question? So I thought it's a natural question that flows from my first two books. I would stipulate that the theory of intelligent design, formally as a theory, is a theory of design detection. And it allows us to detect the action of an agent as opposed to undirected material processes. We have this example that we often use. If you look at the faces on the mountains at Mount Rushmore, you right away know that a designing intelligence of some kind was responsible for sculpting those faces. And those faces exhibit two properties which, when found together, invariably and reliably indicate a designing intelligence. And we've described those properties as high probability and what's called a specification, a pattern match. And we have evidence of small probability specifications in life. If something is an informational sequence, it's another way of revealing design, so that we can get into all of that. The point is, we've got evidence of design in life, but, the cosmology and fine-tuning allow us to adjudicate between two different design hypotheses, the imminent intelligence and the transcendent one. And I thought, well, let's take this on. It's a natural, it goes beyond the theory of intelligent design, formally speaking, and it addresses one of the possible implications of the evidence of design that we have in biology, that maybe we're looking at a theistic designer, not a space alien.  I just want to pick one or two things from different books. Signature in the Cells, you have it there behind you. And when you simply begin to look at the complexity of cells. You realize that they are like little mini cities, that actually everything, so much happens within. And I guess we are learning more and more about everything in life. And you talk to doctors and they tell you that they are learning more and more about how the body functions. And there's a lot of the unknown. But when you look at that just complexity of, we call it the simple cell, which isn't really very simple, that new research and that new understanding, surely that should move people to a position that, this is impossible, that this level of complexity simply just happens. So tell us about that, just the cell, which is not simple.  Yeah, that's the sort of ground zero for me in my research and interest in the question was this origin of life problem. That's what I did my PhD on. And I think it's really interesting. We could have debates about the adequacy of Darwinian evolutionary theory. I'm sceptical about what's called macroevolutionary theory. But set that all aside. Darwin presupposed one or a few simple forms. And in the immediate wake of the Darwinian Revolution, people like Huxley and Heckel started to develop theories of the origin of those first simple cells. And they regarded the cell in the late 19th century as a very simple, as Huxley put it, a simple homogenous globule or homogeneous globule of undifferentiated protoplasm. And they viewed the essence of the cell as a simple chemical, it's coming from a simple chemical substance they called protoplasm. And so it kind of, and they viewed it as a kind of jello or goo, which could be produced by a few simple chemical reactions. That viewpoint started to fall by the wayside very, very quickly. By the 1890s, early part of the 20th century, we were learning a lot more about the complexity of metabolism. When you get to the molecular biological revolution in the late 1950s and 1960s, nobody any longer thinks the cell is simple because the most important biomacromolecules are large information-bearing molecules that are part of a larger information processing system. And so this is where I think, and in confronting that. And so any origin of life theory has to explain where that came from. My supervisor used to say that the nature of life and the origin of life topics are connected. We need to know what life is in order to formulate a plausible theory of how it came to be. And now that we know that life is much more complex and that we have an integrated informational complexity that characterizes life, those 19th century theories and the first origin of life theories associated with figures like Alexander Oparin, for example, from the 1920s and 30s. These are not adequate to explain what we see. But what's happened, and this is what I documented in Signature in the Cell, is that none of the subsequent chemical evolutionary theories, whether they're based on chance or based on self-organizational laws or somehow based on somehow combining the two, none of those theories have proven adequate either. This problem of sequence specificity or functional information has defied explanation by reference to theories that start from lower level chemistry. It's proven very, very difficult, implausible in the extreme. Here's the problem. Getting from the chemistry to the code is the problem. And undirected chemical processes do not, when observed, move in a life-friendly, information-generative direction. And this has been the problem. So the impasse in origin of life research, which really began in the late 70s, was documented by this book I mentioned, the mystery of life's origin and books, another book, for example, by Robert Shapiro called, Origins, A Sceptic's Guide. That impasse from the 1980s has continued right to the present. Dawkins was interviewed in a film in 2009 by Ben Stein, the American economist and comic. And very quickly, Stein got Dawkins to acknowledge that nobody knows how we got from from the prebiotic chemistry to the first cell. Well, that's kind of a news headline. We get the impression from textbooks that the evolutionary biologists have this all sewed up. They don't by any means. This is a longstanding conundrum. And it is the integrated complexity and informational properties of the cell that have, I think, most fundamentally defied explanation by these chemical evolutionary theories. And I think that's very significant when you think of the whole kind of evolutionary story. Darwin thought that if you could start with something simple then the mutation selection, oh, he didn't have mutations, but the mutation, sorry, the natural selection variation mechanism, could generate all the complexity of life. You'd go from simple to complex very gradually. Well, if the simplest thing is immensely complex and manifest a kind of complexity that defies any undirected process that we can think of, well, then you don't have a seamless evolutionary story from goo to you. Because I guess when you're Darwin's doubt, the next book you wrote, I guess when Charles Darwin wrote Origin of the Species, he assumed it was settled. But science is never settled. There are always developments. And yet it seems, oh, that's sacrosanct, and that cannot be touched and must be accepted. Yeah, and what I did in the second book was show or argue that the information problem is not something that only resides at the lowest level in the biological hierarchy, at the point of the origin of the first cell, but it also emerges later when we have major innovations in the history of life as documented by the fossil record, events such as the Cambrian explosion or the origin of the mammalian radiation or the angiosperm revolution. There are many events in the history of life where you get this sudden or abrupt appearance in the fossil record of completely new form and structure. And we now know in our information age, as it's come to biology, that if you want to build a new cell, you've got to have new proteins. So you have to to have information to build the first cell. But the same thing turns out to be true at the higher level. If you want to build a completely new body plan, you need new organs and tissues. You need to arrange those organs and tissues in very specific ways. And you need new proteins to service the new cell types that make the organs and tissues possible. So anytime we see the abrupt appearance of new biological form, that implies the origin of a vast amount of new biological information.  And so in Darwin's doubt, I simply asked, well, is there, can the standard mutation natural selection mechanism explain the origin of the kind of information that arises and the amount of information arises? And I argue there that no, it doesn't. That we have, there are many, many kinds of biological phenomena that Darwin's mechanism explains beautifully, the small scale variation adaptation, that sort of thing. So 2016, a major conference at the Royal Society in London. First talk there was by the evolutionary biologist Gerd Müller. The conference was convened by a group of evolutionary biologists who think we need a new theory of evolution. Whereas Darwinism does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation, it does a poor job or a completely inadequate job of explaining large-scale morphological innovation, large-scale changes in form. And Mueller, in his first talk at this 2016 event, outlined what he called the explanatory deficits of Neo-Darwinism, and he made that point very clearly. And so it's, I think it's a new day in evolutionary biology, the word of this is not percolating so well perhaps but that was part of the reasons I wrote Darwin's doubt is that within the biological peer-reviewed biological literature it's well known that the problem of the origin of large-scale form, the origin of new body plans is not well explained by the mutation selection mechanism. At this 16 conference, the conveners included many scientists who were trying to come up with new mechanisms that might explain the problem of morphological innovation. Afterwards, one of the conveners said the conference was characterized by a lack of momentousness. Effectively, the evolutionary biologists proposing new theories of evolution and new evolutionary mechanisms had done a good job characterizing the problems, but had not really come up with anything that solves the fundamental problems that we encounter in biology when we see these large jumps in form and structure arising. And in Darwin's Doubt, I didn't just critique standard neo-Darwinian theories of evolution, but many of these newer theories as well, showing that invariably the problem of the origin of biological information and the form that arises from it is the key unsolved problem in contemporary evolutionary theory.  Mueller and Newman wrote a book with MIT Press called On the Origins of Organismal Form, which was a kind of play on the origin of species. Darwinism does a nice job of explaining speciation, small-scale changes within the limits of the pre-existing genomic endowments of an organism, but it doesn't do a good job of explaining new form that requires new genetic information. And these authors, Newman and Mueller, listed in a table of unsolved problems in evolutionary theory, the problem of the origin of biological form. That's what we thought Darwin explained back in 1859, and instead we realized that the mechanisms that he first envisioned have much more limited creative power and much more limited explanatory scope. So that's what my second book was about, and also I think it's still, this is still very much right at the cutting edge of the discussion in evolutionary biology. We can explain the small scale stuff, but not the big scale stuff. Let's just finish off with actually disseminating the information, because all of this is about taking issues which are complex and actually making it understandable to the wider public. And I guess part of that is, I mean, obviously being on the most popular podcast in the world, Joe Rogan, I was like, oh, there's Steve Meyer and Joe Rogan. And taking that information and that turbocharges that. So maybe just to finish off on the ability to disseminate this, because I think in the US, the ID movement is more understood, where I think maybe in Europe, it's certainly it's more misunderstood and not as accepted where there is an acceptance in the States. But tell us about that and how being on something like podcasts like that turbocharge the message. Yeah, well, I can tell you, you know, now that I'm getting introduced at conferences and things after The Joe Rogan Experience, it's as if I never did anything else in my life. No, that's the only thing people care to mention. I mean, he's got a monster reach. He's extremely, his questions on the interview were very probative. Of course, slightly to moderately sceptical, maybe more, but I thought they were fair. I thought it was a great discussion and it was a lot of fun. And, you know, we've had not only, I think he gets something like 11 million downloads on average for his podcast. We couldn't even believe these numbers when we were told them. But there have been over 25 million derivative videos that social media influencers and podcasters have made about the Rogan interview, analysing different sections of our conversation. So, yeah, that was a huge boost to the dissemination of our message. But one thing I realized in our conversation that there's a simple way to understand the information argument. And that's one of our tools in getting some of these ideas out is distilling some of these things that we've been talking about at a fairly deep level to a more understandable level. So let me just run that argument, that argument sketch or the distillation of the argument by your audience. And then they would talk about some of the things we're doing to get the word out. Our local hero in the Seattle area here is Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft. And he has said, like Dawkins, that the digital code in the DNA, that the DNA is like a software program, but much more complex than any we've ever created. Dawkins, as I mentioned before, says it's like a machine code. It contains machine code. Well, if you think about that, those are very suggestive quotations because what we know from our uniform and repeated experience, which is the basis of all scientific reasoning, is that information always arises from an intelligence source. If you have a section of software, there was a programmer involved. If you have a hieroglyphic inscription, there was an ancient scribe involved. If you have a paragraph in a book, there was a writer involved. As we're effectively broadcasting, we're transmitting information, that information ultimately issues from our mind. So whenever we look at information, an informational text or sequence, and we trace it back to its ultimate source, we always come to a mind rather than a material process. All attempts to explain the origin of life based on undirected material processes have failed because they couldn't explain the information present in DNA, RNA proteins. So the presence of that information at the foundation of life, based on our uniform and repeated experience about what it takes to generate information is therefore best explained by the activity of a designing intelligence. It takes a programmer to make a program, to make a software program. And what we have in life is, from many different standpoints, identical to computer code. It is a section of functional digital information. So that's a kind of more user-friendly sketch of the argument but the point is some of these some of these key ideas that are that make intelligent design so, I think so persuasive at a high scientific level if you actually look at the evidence, can be also explained fairly simply and so we're generating a lot of not just Joe Rogan podcast interviews but coming on many many podcasts and that sort of thing but also we're generating a lot of YouTube video short documentaries that get some of these ideas across and for your viewers, one that I might recommend which is on of any it was out on the internet it's called science uprising and it's a series of 10 short documentary videos, another one that we've done called the information enigma which I think would would help people get into these ideas fairly quickly, the information enigmas I think it's a 20 minute short documentary it's up online and we've had hundreds of thousands of views so we're doing a lot to sort of translate the most rigorous science into accessible ideas and disseminate that in user-friendly ways. The best website for finding a lot of this compiled is actually the website for my most recent book, Return of the God Hypothesis. So the website there is returntothegodhypothesis.com. Okay, well, we will have the link for that in the description.  Dr. Stephen Meyer, I really appreciate you coming along. Thank you so much for coming and sharing your experience and understandings of writing and making that understandable, I think, to the viewers, many of them who may not have come across this before.  So thank you for your time today. I really appreciate you having me on, Peter.

Der Cocktail "Walter Frosch" war simpel: Er bestand aus Zigaretten, Zweikämpfen und einer schon fast selbstzerstörerische Ehrlichkeit. Eine Mischung, die ihm in der Fußballwelt viele Freundinnen und Freunde einbrachte. Unvergessen bleibt sein legendäres Interview am Tag der Legenden 2007 im Millerntorstadion auf St. Pauli. Mit den Zigaretten im Stutzen stand er dem Reporter Rede und Antwort. Froschi war ein Original, welches man auf diesem hohen Level wohl nie wieder finden wird. Seine Eigenwilligkeit brachte ihn dabei um größeren Ruhm. So hätte sich Froschi fast neben Franz Beckenbauer, Sepp Maier und Gerd Müller in die Reihe der legendären Bayernspieler der 70er Jahre eingereiht. Doch Walter Frosch blieb Walter Frosch und reihte sich stattdessen in die Spieler ein, über die wohl nirgendwo je ein schlechtes Wort gefallen ist. Und das, obwohl in den 70ern die Frage gestellt wurde: "Wer hat Angst vor Walter Frosch?" In dieser Episode gibt es einen Rückblick auf die besondere Karriere und das extreme Leben von Walter Frosch: Zigaretten, Zweikämpfe und viel mehr!

Wir führten ein Studiogespräch mit Gerd Müller, früherer Betriebsrat, Arbeitskämpfender und immer Mitarbeitender im Medien Pädagpogik Zentrum Hamburg https://mpz-hamburg.de/. Video des MPZ mit einer Zusammenfassung der Protestkundgebung vom 11. November am Hamburger Rathaus: https://vimeo.com/885372945 Angehängt ist ein Audio mit dem gestrigen taz Salon zum Hamburger Hafen in mäßiger Tonqualität https://taz.de/taz-Salon-zum-Hamburger-Hafen/!5976830/ Es lohnt sich sehr, das Ganze durchzuhören - ganz viel Info!

München ist ein interessanter Ort Anfang der Sechzigerjahre: kürzere Röcke, nacktere Haut, längere Nächte, mehr Vespas, mehr Cappuccino. Weniger aufregend ist zu dieser Zeit der Fußball. Wer sich diesen Proletensport anschauen will, geht nach Giesing zum TSV 1860. Doch in München rumort es zu dieser Zeit, ausgerechnet im feinen Schwabing: Auf den Straßen randalieren Mitte 1962 die Jugendlichen und ein lokaler Fußballverein schickt sich an, die Münchner Fußballordnung auf den Kopf zu stellen. Zwei ehrgeizigen Funktionären namens Wilhelm Neudecker und Robert Schwan gelingt es, Talente wie Sepp Maier, Gerd Müller und Franz Beckenbauer zum bis dahin wenig erfolgreichen FC Bayern zu locken – und den Sechzgern teilweise vor der Nase wegzuschnappen. Erlebt mit uns zum Auftakt unserer Spezial-Staffel die jungen Jahre dreier deutscher Ausnahmefußballer und den Beginn der größten Erfolgsgeschichte des deutschen Fußballs.+++Eine Produktion der Wake Word Studios im Auftrag von RTL+Host: Lena CasselAutor, Regisseur und Co-Host: Berni MayerRedaktion: Stefan Rommel und Tim PommerenkeSound Design: Philipp KlauerRedaktionsleitung Audio Alliance: Silvana Katzer+++Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://art19.com/privacy. Die Datenschutzrichtlinien für Kalifornien sind unter https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info abrufbar.

Llega un nuevo parón internacional y, tras un tercio de la temporada, Bayer Leverkusen sigue mirando a todos desde arriba. Los especialistas de Mi Bundesliga analizan al equipo de Xabi Alonso y sus posibilidades reales de convertirse en campeones de liga. Además, habrá lugar para la comparación de Harry Kane y Serhou Guirassy con Robert Lewandowski y Gerd Müller, ¿qué pasará con Thomas Tuchel?, las posibles salidas del FC Bayern München y mucho más... José I. Araoz, Tomás Incze, Blas Díaz y Cata Beltramino tocan tantos tópicos que se les queda corto el programa. Viví todo el fútbol alemán en Mi Bundesliga

As Bayern Munich enter another international break, one player has shone brighter than the rest. Harry Kane is a phenomenon — he has 17 goals in 11 Bundesliga matchdays, surpassing the likes of Robert Lewandowski and Gerd Müller. This has people talking, but that's not the only major thing that has taken place in the last week or so. FCB youth player Aleksandar Pavlović made his starting XI debut, and Thomas Tuchel has picked a fight with the German media. In this episode, INNN and Schnitzel discuss the following: Is Harry Kane already a better striker than Robert Lewandowski? What would it take for Kane to surpass Lewandowski's legacy at Bayern Munich? Is a Ballon d'Or on the cards for Harry Kane? Switching gears — INNN argues that Thomas Tuchel has managed to do a few things better than Julian Nagelsmann did. How would Nagelsmann have fared with Harry Kane? What could Nagelsmann have planned for Germany in this international break? Is it time for Joshua Kimmich to move back to right-back? Does Germany need a new striker? Be sure to stay tuned to Bavarian Podcast Works for all of your up to date coverage on Bayern Munich and Germany. Follow us on Twitter @BavarianFBWorks, @TheBarrelBlog, @tommyadams71, @bfwinnn, and more.

As Bayern Munich enter another international break, one player has shone brighter than the rest. Harry Kane is a phenomenon — he has 17 goals in 11 Bundesliga matchdays, surpassing the likes of Robert Lewandowski and Gerd Müller. This has people talking, but that's not the only major thing that has taken place in the last week or so. FCB youth player Aleksandar Pavlović made his starting XI debut, and Thomas Tuchel has picked a fight with the German media. In this episode, INNN and Schnitzel discuss the following: Is Harry Kane already a better striker than Robert Lewandowski? What would it take for Kane to surpass Lewandowski's legacy at Bayern Munich? Is a Ballon d'Or on the cards for Harry Kane? Switching gears — INNN argues that Thomas Tuchel has managed to do a few things better than Julian Nagelsmann did. How would Nagelsmann have fared with Harry Kane? What could Nagelsmann have planned for Germany in this international break? Is it time for Joshua Kimmich to move back to right-back? Does Germany need a new striker? Be sure to stay tuned to Bavarian Podcast Works for all of your up to date coverage on Bayern Munich and Germany. Follow us on Twitter @BavarianFBWorks, @TheBarrelBlog, @tommyadams71, @bfwinnn, and more.

Kultfiguren, Revolutionäre, Weltmeister, Skandalnudeln, Popstars – Mitte der 1960er werden fünf bayerische Nachkriegsbuben Seite an Seite zu den berühmtesten Fußballern Deutschlands: Franz Beckenbauer, Gerd Müller, Sepp Maier, Uli Hoeneß und Paul Breitner. In zehn gemeinsamen Jahren machen sie aus dem FC Bayern einen der größten Vereine der Welt. Fünf Fußballikonen, fünf unfassbare Karrieren, ein Podcast, der ihre gemeinsame Geschichte voller Skandale, Randale und Erfolge erzählt. Denn gute Freunde kann eben niemand trennen, oder?Ab 15. November – immer zuerst auf RTL+.+++Eine Produktion der Wake Word Studios im Auftrag von RTL+Host: Lena CasselAutor, Regisseur und Co-Host: Berni MayerRedaktion: Stefan Rommel und Tim PommerenkeSound Design: Philipp KlauerRedaktionsleitung Audio Alliance: Silvana KatzerExecutive Producer: Andrea Zuska, Christian Schalt+++Unsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien findet ihr unter https://datenschutz.ad-alliance.de/podcast.htmlUnsere allgemeinen Datenschutzrichtlinien finden Sie unter https://art19.com/privacy. Die Datenschutzrichtlinien für Kalifornien sind unter https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info abrufbar.

Dominos

Anlässlich der Fußball-WM der Frauen holen wir eine ganz besondere Folge aus dem Archiv. Eine Folge, die eine ganz besondere Kämpferin für euch bereit hält: Die Weltmeisterin von 1981 Anne Trabant-Haarbach. „Fußball ist nichts für Mädchen“ – Anne Haarbach will das einfach von Klein auf nicht akzeptieren und setzte sich gemeinsam mit anderen Frauen durch, denn Fußball ist ihre Leidenschaft. Anne Trabant-Haarbach wurde wie Kim am 01.01. geboren, allerdings im Jahr 1949. Der Deutsche Fußball-Bund (DFB) verbot am 30. Juli 1955 verbot Frauen das Fußballspielen, denn "Im Kampf um den Ball verschwindet die weibliche Anmut, Körper und Seele erleiden unweigerlich Schaden, und das Zurschaustellen des Körpers verletzt Schicklichkeit und Anstand". Der DFB droht seinen Vereinen mit harten Strafen, wenn sie Frauenmannschaften gründen oder ihnen erlauben, auf ihren Plätzen zu trainieren. Der Mittelstürmer Uwe Seeler ist Annes Idol. „Ich werde einmal in einer Frauen-Nationalmannschaft spielen“, sagte sich Anne als Kind. „Träumerei“, sagt die Mutter. Der DFB hebt 1970 das Verbot für Frauenfußball auf, weil sich doch viele wilde Frauenmannschaften gebildet hatten. Äußerungen von Profis waren damals z.B. von Trainer Rudi Gutendorf: „Im Bett kann eine Frau so herrlich sein, auf dem Fußballplatz wird sie mir immer schrecklich vorkommen.“ oder Stürmer Gerd Müller meint 1980: „Ich glaube nicht, dass dieser Sport genauso populär wird wie unser traditioneller Fußball. Warum sollten Frauen auch hinter dem Ball herlaufen? Sie gehören doch hinter den Kochtopf.“ Doch es gibt auch Männer, die sich für den Frauenfußball stark machen. 1981 lud Taiwan zu einer ersten Fußballweltmeisterschaft der Frauen ein. Da die Gründung einer Frauennationalmannschaft für den DFB bis dahin nicht von Interesse war, ging die Einladung an die deutschen Rekordmeisterinnen der SSG 09 Bergisch Gladbach, wo sie Spielertrainerin war; in einer Zeit, in der die Ausbildung eigentlich Männersache war. In 40 Jahren Frauenfußball in Deutschland war sie maßgeblich an elf Meistertiteln als Spielerin, Spielertrainerin oder Trainerin direkt involviert. Sie holte als erste Spielführerin einer deutschen Frauen-Nationalmannschaft 1974 und 1975 die ersten beiden Meisterschaften überhaupt und stellte den SSG 09 Bergisch Gladbach zwischen 1977 und 1989 neunmal auf den nationalen Fußballthron. Herzlichen Dank an Emilia Gatzke, die Cathrin und Kim diese Frau auf Instagram empfahl. Viel Freude mit der Sicht von den beiden auf Anne Trabant-Haarbach.So erreicht ihr uns: Mail an: starkefrauenpodcast@gmail.comEure Spende via Paypal an starkefrauenpodcast@gmail.comHomepage: www.podcaststarkefrauen.deShirts "Frauen stärken": https://starke-frauen.myspreadshop.de/Online Kurs "Frauen ans Mikro": https://www.frauenansmikro.de/Alle Kontaktdaten und Links: linktr.ee/starkefrauen#starkefrauen #frauenfußball #FußballWM #Fußballlegende #FrauenvorbildPhoto: dfb.de / imago Möchtest Du Cathrin oder Kim auf einen Kaffee einladen und dafür die Episoden werbefrei hören? Dann klicke auf den folgenden Link: https://plus.acast.com/s/starke-frauen. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Almanya'da Spor Kültürü Almanlar, sporu seven bir millettir. Sporun dünyada en yaygın olduğu ülkelerden biri de Almanya'dır. Sporun insan hayatına bu kadar girdiği ülkeler çok azdır. Almanya'da altyapıya çok önem verilir. Her yerleşim bölgesinde açık ve kapalı spor salonları vardır. Çocuklar, küçük yaşlardan itibaren spora özendirilir ve desteklenir. Futbol dışında özellikle jimnastik, masa tenisi, voleybol, hentbol, buz hokeyi ve yüzme çok popülerdir. Çocuklar, hafta sonlarını aileleriyle birlikte jimnastik ve yürüyüş yaparak değerlendirirler. Yeni doğan bebekler bile, çocuklar için hazırlanmış havuzlarda anne babalarıyla birlikte havuza girerek suyla tanışırlar. Almanya'da yüzme bilmeyen insan çok azdır. Alman hükümeti, spora çok önem verir. Spora kabiliyeti olan çocuklar 5-6 yaşlarında tespit edilir. Bu çocuklar, küçük yaştan itibaren antrenörler tarafından yetiştirilir. Bu ülkede insanlar, sporun her çeşidini yapma imkânına sahiptir. Gerek olimpiyat oyunlarında gerekse dünya şampiyonalarında Almanya her zaman en üst sıralardadır Almanlar, sporu zengin olmak ya da meşhur olmak için yapmazlar. Bu ülkede devlet, başarılı olan sporcuları maddi ve manevi yönden destekler. Almanya'da özellikle futbol çok önemli bir spordur. Alman Millî Futbol Takımı; 1954, 1974 ve 1990 Dünya Futbol Şampiyonası'nı kazanmıştır. Ayrıca 1972, 1980 ve 1996'da Avrupa futbol şampiyonu olmuştur. Alman futbol kulüpleri, uluslararası şampiyonalarda büyük başarılar elde etmiştir. Almanya'da; Franz Beckenbauer, Sepp Maier, Gerd Müller, Brigel, Jürgen Klinsmann, Michael Ballack gibi efsane futbolcular yetişmiştir. Almanya'nın dünyaya tanıtımında spor çok önemli bir araçtır. Derleyen Sezgin Akçay

Bericht über das Ringelpietz Bogenturnier in Nördlingen

Hinn 4. júní árið 1983 vann Atli Eðvaldsson ótrúlegt afrek, því þann dag skoraði hann öll fimm mörk Fortuna Düsseldorf í 5-1 sigri liðsins á Eintracht Frankfurt í efstu deild Þýskalands í fótbolta. Strax daginn eftir skoraði svo Atli sigurmark Íslands í 1-0 sigri á Möltu í undankeppni EM á Laugardalsvelli og toppaði þar með hreint ótrúlegan sólarhring á sínum ferli. Atli rifjaði upp þennan magnaða sólarhring í áður ófluttu viðtali við RÚV sem tekið var vorið 2016. Aðrir viðmælendur eru Pétur Ormslev, Samúel Örn Erlingsson, Skapti Hallgrímsson og Sif Atladóttir. Þar sem hin óvenjulega staða kom upp að það væri landsleikur degi eftir deildarleik tókst KSÍ að útvega litla flugvél til að sækja Atla og Pétur Ormslev sem báðir léku með Fortuna Düsseldorf. Með í þessa för fóru svo blaðamennirnir Skapti Hallgrímsson fyrir Morgunblaðið, Samúel Örn Erlingsson fyrir NT og Friðþjófur Helgason ljósmyndari DV auk Helga Daníelssonar sem var formaður landsliðsnefndar KSÍ. Atli varð fyrsti erlendi leikmaðurinn til að skora fimm mörk í einum deildarleik í efstu deild Þýskalands. Síðan þá hafa aðeins tveir aðrir leikið það eftir. Pólski markahrókurinn Robert Lewandowski skoraði öll mörkin í 5-1 sigri Bayern á Wolfsburg í september 2015. Serbneski framherjinn Luka Jovic skoraði svo fimm mörk í 7-1 sigri Eintracht Frankfurt á Fortuna Düsseldorf í október 2018. Þar áttust semsagt sömu lið og þegar Atli skoraði mörkin sín fimm árið 1983. Hvorki Lewandowski né Jovic, eða þess þá heldur Gerd Müller, Jupp Heynckes, Jürgen Klinsmann eða þeir Þjóðverjar skoruðu einhvern tímann fimm mörk í deildarleik í Þýskalandi, tókst að spila landsleik daginn eftir eins og Atli gerði í júní 1983. Dagskrárgerð: Þorkell Gunnar Sigurbjörnsson.

Hinn 4. júní árið 1983 vann Atli Eðvaldsson ótrúlegt afrek, því þann dag skoraði hann öll fimm mörk Fortuna Düsseldorf í 5-1 sigri liðsins á Eintracht Frankfurt í efstu deild Þýskalands í fótbolta. Strax daginn eftir skoraði svo Atli sigurmark Íslands í 1-0 sigri á Möltu í undankeppni EM á Laugardalsvelli og toppaði þar með hreint ótrúlegan sólarhring á sínum ferli. Atli rifjaði upp þennan magnaða sólarhring í áður ófluttu viðtali við RÚV sem tekið var vorið 2016. Aðrir viðmælendur eru Pétur Ormslev, Samúel Örn Erlingsson, Skapti Hallgrímsson og Sif Atladóttir. Þar sem hin óvenjulega staða kom upp að það væri landsleikur degi eftir deildarleik tókst KSÍ að útvega litla flugvél til að sækja Atla og Pétur Ormslev sem báðir léku með Fortuna Düsseldorf. Með í þessa för fóru svo blaðamennirnir Skapti Hallgrímsson fyrir Morgunblaðið, Samúel Örn Erlingsson fyrir NT og Friðþjófur Helgason ljósmyndari DV auk Helga Daníelssonar sem var formaður landsliðsnefndar KSÍ. Atli varð fyrsti erlendi leikmaðurinn til að skora fimm mörk í einum deildarleik í efstu deild Þýskalands. Síðan þá hafa aðeins tveir aðrir leikið það eftir. Pólski markahrókurinn Robert Lewandowski skoraði öll mörkin í 5-1 sigri Bayern á Wolfsburg í september 2015. Serbneski framherjinn Luka Jovic skoraði svo fimm mörk í 7-1 sigri Eintracht Frankfurt á Fortuna Düsseldorf í október 2018. Þar áttust semsagt sömu lið og þegar Atli skoraði mörkin sín fimm árið 1983. Hvorki Lewandowski né Jovic, eða þess þá heldur Gerd Müller, Jupp Heynckes, Jürgen Klinsmann eða þeir Þjóðverjar skoruðu einhvern tímann fimm mörk í deildarleik í Þýskalandi, tókst að spila landsleik daginn eftir eins og Atli gerði í júní 1983. Dagskrárgerð: Þorkell Gunnar Sigurbjörnsson.

Der bekannte deutsche Stürmer Gerd Müller (1945–2021) schoss in der Bundesliga-Saison 1971/1972 40 Saisontore. Diese beeindruckende Marke galt lange Zeit als unerreichbar und nicht wiederholbar. Die Leistung des »Bombers der Nation« ging als »ewiger Torrekord« in die Bundesligageschichte ein. Rund 50 Jahre später wurde dieser Rekord aber doch überboten: Der polnische Stürmer Robert Lewandowski schoss in der Saison 2020/2021 überragende 41 Tore in nur 34 Spieltagen, wobei er noch einige Spiele verletzt verpasste.Die Leistungen der beiden Stürmer waren wirklich außergewöhnlich! Doch wie lange halten diese Rekorde? So gut diese Leistungen auch sind, ewig halten sie nicht. Es kommt der Tag, an dem der Rekord übertroffen wird oder in Vergessenheit gerät.Jesus sagt, dass seine Worte nicht vergehen werden. Das ist eine steile Behauptung! Doch Jesu Worte sind schon über 2000 Jahre alt und immer noch gültig, aktuell und wahr. Sie haben Regierungen und Meinungen überlebt. Wir halten seine Worte, die in der Bibel niedergeschrieben sind, immer noch in unseren Händen, auch wenn mehrere Versuche unternommen wurden, sie zu vernichten.Viele Menschen sind über diese Erde gegangen, doch keiner hat so viele Menschen mit seinen Worten nachhaltig verändert wie Jesus Christus. In seinen Worten finden wir die Zusage, dass jeder, der an ihn glaubt, ewiges Leben hat. Und dass jeder, der sein Leben mit ihm lebt, eine ewige Belohnung bekommen wird, nämlich eine Belohnung, die ihm niemand nehmen kann.Wir sehen: Jesu Worte sind ewig und nicht unsere Rekorde, so gut diese auch sein mögen.Diese und viele weitere Andachten online lesenWeitere Informationen zu »Leben ist mehr« erhalten Sie unter www.lebenistmehr.deAudioaufnahmen: Radio Segenswelle

Rahn müßte schießen, Gerd Müller schießt und natürlich Andi Brehme - Momente, die niemand vergißt. Im Finale des WM-Spezials dreht sich im Mutmachpodcast von Funke natürlich alles um das Spiel der Spiele, um psychedelische Momente vor dem Farbfernseher, niederländische Tragödien und Kämpfe bis zum Umfallen. Ob Bern ´54, München `74, Rom ´90 oder all die anderen Endspiele - Fußballfans wissen noch genau, wo sie welches WM-Finals erlebt haben. Es sind selten große Spiele, aber jedes hat seinen eigenen Zauber. Und die ganze Welt schaut zu. Sportreporter Gerhard Waldherr und Hajo Schumacher baden in finaler Nostalgie, erinnern an magische Momente und sagen zum Abschied leise Servus. Plus: „Toni, Toni, halt den Ball!" Folge 502.

Frieden? Nein, Gianni Infantino geht es doch nur um sich. Malte Asmus ist sauer auf den FIFA-Boss und teilt Andreas Wurm seine Meinung klar und deutlich mit. Außerdem hören die beiden Erling Haaland und dessen WM-Tipp zu, empfehlen eine sehenswerte ZDF-Doku über Gerd Müller und erklären, welche tiefen Fußstapfen Sebastian Vettel in der Formel 1 hinterlässt. Dieser Podcast wurde produziert mit freundlicher Unterstützung und Text- und Ton-Material unseres Partners, dem Sport-Informations-Dienst SID. Der SID ist Content-Lieferant für nahezu alle großen Sender und digitalen Sport-Portale. Über 90 Prozent aller Sportredaktionen in Deutschland setzen auf den SID.  Abonniert Stand jetzt doch einfach hier: Apple:  https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast Audio Now: https://audionow.de/podcast/a0ff5b15-... Google Podcast: https://podcasts.google.com/search/st... Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/23nBff7... Deezer: https://www.deezer.com/de/show/1240682 ...Du möchtest deinen Podcast auch kostenlos hosten und damit Geld verdienen? Dann schaue auf www.kostenlos-hosten.de und informiere dich. Dort erhältst du alle Informationen zu unseren kostenlosen Podcast-Hosting-Angeboten.

Perhaps Roy Makaay's striking brilliance was linked to the Scottish roots of the Dutchman's surname, although admittedly the influence of guys like Frans Thijssen, who taught him to shoot with both feet, must also have played a part.We discuss striking legends past and present: Gerd Müller, Karim Benzema, Robert Lewandowski. And I suggest that scoring a hat-trick for Deportivo de La Coruña in Munich didn't exactly hurt Roy's chances of Bayern signing him. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

En este episodio de La Locura de Bielsa os contamos todo sobre la rivalidad entre el Real Madrid y el Bayern Múnich, la mayor a lo largo de la historia de las competiciones europeas, con datos estadísticos y con un repaso de todos y cada uno de los 26 enfrentamientos entre Real Madrid y Bayern a lo largo de sus participaciones en Copa de Europa y Champions League: Beckenbauer, Gerd Müller, Amancio, Camacho, Del Bosque, Sepp Maier, la Quinta del Buitre, Matthaus, Brehme, Juanito, Raúl, Kahn, Scholl, Elber, Anelka, Hierro, Casillas, Zidane, Ronaldo, Makaay, Cristiano Ronaldo, Ramos, Lahm, Kimmich, Lewandowski... ¡Espero que lo disfrutéis! La Locura de Bielsa es una producción de Aletheia Podcasting, puedes encontrar más información, servicios y mucho más en 👉 www.aletheiapodcasting.com Síguenos en Twitter en @LocuraDeBielsa Si te gusta nuestro contenido puedes unirte a nuestro programa de Fans en el botón apoyar. Si te ha gustado el episodio, dale a “Me Gusta” nos ayuda mucho con la visibilidad. Suscríbete a nuestro Canal de YouTube 👉 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnbJZLkA07N6sRNCOSDTMrQ Participa con nosotros en nuestra página de Facebook 👉 https://www.facebook.com/La-Locura-de-Bielsa-Podcast-102143534949756 Contacta con nosotros en los comentarios, en nuestra página de Facebook y en nuestro correo electrónico: lalocuradebielsapodcast@gmail.com La música pertenece a Early Hours, podéis encontrarlos en: https://soundcloud.com/earlyhours

The Athletic Major League Soccer staff writer Pablo Maurer steps into our vortex of what-used-to-be in professional sports this week, with a look back at some of the more confounding and overlooked stories of the not-so-distant past of US pro soccer. It's our deepest dives yet into memorable North American Soccer League gems like 1977's one-year wonder Team Hawaii; 1983's divisive US Men's National Team-as-pro-franchise Team America; the curious Stateside detours of world greats like Bayern Munich superstar Gerd Müeller, Dutch legend Johan Cruyff and Manchester United icon George Best - plus, of course, the NASL's inventive ahead-of-its-time 35-yard-line Shootout tie-breaker. We also tackle some of the already forgotten early days of Major League Soccer - including its own version of the Shootout; LA's ill-fated "first" second franchise Chivas USA; and impossible-to-forget franchise monikers like Wiz, Burn, Clash, and MetroStars. PLUS: the unheralded pre-MLS rules experiments of the mid-90s USISL minor league pyramid. AND: the incomparable (if not incomprehensible) Socker Slam!

Het is eind van de middag, 7 juli 1974. Duitsland wint het WK voetbal in eigen land, ten koste van Oranje. We hadden al de pest aan de Duitsers, maar de rechterwreef van Gerd Müller schiet onze collectieve hoop op revanche definitief aan diggelen. En nog erger, het oer-hollandse spreekwoord “Beter een goede buur dan een verre vriend” zou in ieder geval niet voor onszelf gaan gelden.Hoe anders is het nu. Zowel politiek als economisch zijn we met Duitsland verstrengeld als een verliefd stel in een eenpersoons hoogslaper. Zij het grote lepeltje, wij het kleine. Geen land brengt zoveel toeristen naar Duitsland als wij, en omgekeerd delen we ook graag onze stranden met de Duitse kuilgravers.Goed, we zijn dus vrienden. Nu we Duitsland liefdevol in de ogen kijken, zien we een hoop schoonheid. De kastelen, de bergen, de rivieren. Geven we een kusje, dan proeven we het bier, de Riessling en het knapperige zuurdesembrood. En luisteren we, dan genieten we van 's werelds beste componisten. Was het al opgevallen dat De Grote Podcastlas een grote voorliefde heeft voor Duitsland?Tijdscodes voor deze extra lange aflevering:Blok 1 (demografie / geschiedenis / politiek): 07.25Blok 2 (fysische geografie / economie / toerisme): 54.50Blok 3 (kunst & muziek / keuken / sport): 1.29.22Hebben we iets verkeerd gezegd of zijn we iets cruciaals vergeten? Volg ons en laat het weten via Twitter of Instagram.Je kunt ons enorm helpen door je vrienden, familie en collega's te vertellen over onze podcast óf door vriend van de show te worden. Daarmee steun je ons voor een klein bedrag en kunnen wij weer mooie nieuwe afleveringen maken. Dit kan op Vriend van de Show.Volgende week reizen we naar een land dat jullie hebben uitgekozen. Auf wiedersehen!Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Das größte Vereinsmuseum in Deutschland feiert im Sommer zehnjähriges Bestehen. Anlässlich des Jubiläums ist Andreas Wittner, einer der Mitbegründer des FCB-Vereinsmuseums, in der neusten Folge unseres Podcasts zu Gast. Wie das Vereinsmuseum beispielsweise an die Trikots gekommen ist, die Adi Kunstwadl, Franz Beckenbauer und Gerd Müller beim Bundesliga-Aufstieg 1965 getragen hatten, warum seinetwegen einst die 500.000 Euro-Frage bei „Wer wird Millionär“ wiederholt werden musste, und was die Besucher des FC Bayern Museums am meisten interessiert - das und mehr verrät Andreas Wittner in der neusten Folge des FC Bayern Podcasts.

In this episode we welcome Thomas Rongen. In 1979, Thomas intended to travel for leisure to the United States. Instead, he ended up playing with the Los Angeles Aztecs. From then on, he would play and then go on to coach amazing teams throughout America. Today, the discussion revolves around great players like Rinus Michels, Johann Cruyff, Gerd Müller, Elias Figueroa, and Teófilo Cubillas. Thomas also shares what it was like playing with his idol, his experience coaching in Samoa, and the documentary about it that followed. On this episode: ● How Thomas ended up in America. ● The childhood hero Thomas got to play with. ● A little bit about Thomas' experience playing with the Aztecs. ● Who Thomas says is the most influential player and coach of all time. ● Why after playing in Edmonton, their team never checked out again. ● What the other players got out of working with Johan Cruyff ● The greatest football friend Bob ever had. ● Other sometimes distant but legendary players. ● The new documentary about the NASL that's coming out shortly. ● The rule change in the NASL that opened up the game. ● What happened in 2007 that looked like the reincarnation of the NASL. ● The increasing importance of branding in soccer. ● The event Bob has a warm spot in his heart for. ● What the documentary “Next Goal Wins” is about. ● How Thomas ended up coaching in Samoa. ● Thomas' personal and professional highlights of coaching in Samoa. ● Who played Thomas in the documentary. ● What David appreciated about the documentary.

Der HAZ-Platzwart trifft den Tiete. Der 96-Podwart analysiert in der neuen Folge die verrückte 2. Liga, blickt zurück auf Gerd Müller und entschlüsselt die Handschrift von Jan Zimmermann. Der Podcast über Hannover 96 - wieder mit einem Classic aus erfolgreichen Tagen und der Frage: Wie geht das alles ohne Marvin Ducksch?

Ian is joined by Musa Okwonga and debutant Flo Lloyd-Hughes to chat about the experience and impact of fans being back in full (01:03), especially at Old Trafford and Brentford. They send early-season flowers to Paul Pogba and Trevoh Chalobah after their weekend performances (11:11), look ahead to Arsenal hosting Chelsea (26:17), and reflect on the legacy of legendary German striker Gerd Müller (36:53). Host: Ian Wright Guests: Musa Okwonga and Flo Lloyd-Hughes Producers: Ryan Hunn and Roscoe Bowman Additional Production Assistance: Isaiah Blakely Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Tätä!!! Die große Jubliäumsparty: Folge 100! Mit Ewald und Michael beim Derby am Millerntor, Glückwünschen aus der Liga, alles zum Bundesliga-Start - und mit Klaus Augenthaler würdigen wir den "Bomber der Nation". Erinnerungen an Gerd Müller aus nächster Nähe - alles im Sechzehner...

O 29º episódio do Podcast Futebol no Mundo chega falando da volta de LaLiga e da Premier League, a dívida astronômica do Barça e ainda tem uma homenagem a Gerd Müller! Ouça o podcast com Alex Tseng, Ubiratan leal, Leo Bertozzi e Gustavo Hofman!

Gerd Müller cambió la historia del balompié alemán, del Bayern y del fútbol a nivel internacional. Escribió con letras doradas su nombre en la historia de este deporte y Alberto Lati nos cuenta todo acerca de "El Bombardero". Imperdible episodio en “Biblioteca futvox”, un podcast exclusivo de futvox. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Die 1. Liga ist in die neue Saison gestartet und wir haben alle wichtigen Infos zum Spieltag. Welchen Rekord knackt Erling Haaland als nächstes? Bleibt Stefan Ortega wirklich in Bielefeld? Und warum ist der VfB Stuttgart erster Tabellenführer? Außerdem würdigen wir natürlich den verstorbenen Gerd Müller.

Bayern Munich will finish off its Bundesliga campaign against FC Augsburg in what nearly everyone is hoping will be a record-breaking performance from Robert Lewandowski.  The Polish Hitman will be aiming to break Gerd Müller's league scoring record, while also working to send many of his teammates and coaches off with a win. On this episode we discuss the following:  The recent form of each team. Lewandowski's final push for Müller's record. A guess at Bayern Munich's lineup. An appreciation of Hansi Flick, David Alaba, Hermann Gerland, Javi Martinez, Jerome Boateng, etc. A prediction on the match. As always, thank you for the support! Be sure to rate us, like us, subscribe to us, and follow us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and anywhere else you get your quality audio content. Find any of the contributors on Twitter @BavarianFBWorks, @jeffersonfenner, @TheBarrelBlog, and @TommyAdams71. For the latest and greatest in football news, Bayern news, German news and transfer rumors, be sure to check out www.bavarianfootballworks.com! Enjoy the episode! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this episode, Chris and J.P. break down the standings in each of Europe's top five leagues heading into the final match day of the season. They discuss Alisson saving Liverpool's Champions League hopes with a last-minute header, Chelsea and Leicester battling for top four, Lewandowski tying Gerd Müller's goal record for a single season, the battle for LaLiga's crown, and race for Champions League spots in Serie A.

Bayern Munich will travel to Schwarzwald-Stadion to take on SC Freiburg in Bundesliga action. The Bavarians are looking to finish strong and hopefully see Robert Lewandowski break Gerd Müller's goal scoring record in the process. Let's take a look at what we talk about on this episode: A look at each team's current form. A quick admiration of Christian Streich.  How good Robert Lewandowski has been and why he deserves to break the record. A guess at Hansi Flick's lineup. A prediction on the game. (Please note this episode was recorded prior to Flick announcing that Alexander Nübel would play.) As always, thank you for the support! Be sure to rate us, like us, subscribe to us, and follow us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and anywhere else you get your quality audio content. Find any of the contributors on Twitter @BavarianFBWorks, @jeffersonfenner, @TheBarrelBlog, and @TommyAdams71. For the latest and greatest in football news, Bayern news, German news and transfer rumors, be sure to check out www.bavarianfootballworks.com! Enjoy this episode! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Auteur d'un triplé contre le Borussia Mönchengladbach (6-0), Robert Lewandowski compte désormais 39 buts en 27 matches de Bundesliga. À un but d'égaler le record de Gerd Müller, le Polonais continue d'écrire l'histoire du Bayern Munich et du football allemand

Bayern Munich and Mainz 05 will meet in a Bundesliga match where we should see Robert Lewandowski make his triumphant return  The question remains, though, how will Bayern Munich respond to the news that Flick has asked to be released from his contract after the season? Chances are that the Bavarians will be just fine in this one. At this stage of the season, Bayer Leverkusen also needs victories, but has been far less consistent than needed.  In this episode, we discuss the following hot topics: Bayern Munich's injury situation. The current form of both squads. Why Jamal Musiala should start...again! Robert Lewandowski's impact and his hunt for Gerd Müller's record. A guess at how Flick will lineup his squad.  A prediction on the contest. As always, thank you for the support! Be sure to rate us, like us, subscribe to us, and follow us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and anywhere else you get your quality audio content. Find any of the contributors on Twitter @BavarianFBWorks, @jeffersonfenner, @TheBarrelBlog, and @TommyAdams71. For the latest and greatest in football news, Bayern news, German news and transfer rumors, be sure to check out www.bavarianfootballworks.com! Enjoy this episode! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

FT: Bayern 4-2 BVB [Haaland (2', 9'), Lewandowski (26', 44', 90'), Goretzka (88')] BVB Stats: *4 shots, 3 SOG *72% passing, 35% possession FCB Stats: *27 shots, 9 SOG *88% passing, 65% possession -This was a fun game from beginning to end -Injuries hurt both sides -Lewandowski now nine goals away from Gerd Müller's record Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices